alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1878 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1878

  To extend for 2 years the period of applicability of enrollment mix 
   requirement to certain health maintenance organizations providing 
                services under Dayton Area Health Plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1995

Mr. Hobson (for himself and Mr. Hall of Ohio) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend for 2 years the period of applicability of enrollment mix 
   requirement to certain health maintenance organizations providing 
                services under Dayton Area Health Plan.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENDING PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY OF ENROLLMENT MIX 
              REQUIREMENT TO CERTAIN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS 
              PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER DAYTON AREA HEALTH PLAN.

    Section 2 of Public Law 102-278, as amended by section 13644 of the 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, is amended by striking 
``December 31, 1995'' and inserting ``December 31, 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: colaughlin1@hotmail.com [mailto:colaughlin1@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol O'Laughlin 

660 Kingfisher Ct. 

Streetsboro, OH 44241
§ 179.202-6 Thermal protection system. The DOT Specification 117 tank car must have a thermal protection system. The thermal protection system must: ( a ) Conform to § 179.18 of this part;
( b ) Be equipped with a thermal protection blanket with at least 1 ⁄ 2-inch-thick material that meets § 179.18(c) of this part; and
( c ) Include a reclosing pressure relief device in accordance with § 173.31 of this subchapter.
[81 FR 53957, Aug. 15, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.601 Scope.

This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for the operation of pipeline facilities.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.18
                                AMENDMENT NO. 6

                              TO SERVICE AGREEMENT


         This Amendment No. 6 to Service Agreement (this "Amendment") is
entered into as of the 21st day of June, 1997, between Phoenix Network, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Carrier") and US ONE Communications Services Corp., a
Delaware corporation ("USOC").


                                    RECITALS

         A.      Carrier and US ONE Communications Corp., a Delaware
corporation and parent corporation of USOC ("Parent") entered into a
Communications Services Agreement, dated May 22, 1996 (the "Original
Agreement") regarding the provision of various services by Parent to Carrier.

         B.      With the consent of Carrier, Parent assigned its rights and
obligations under the Original Agreement to USOC on November 19, 1996.

         C.      Amendment No. 1 to Service Agreement was entered into by
Carrier and Parent on October 11, 1996; Amendment No. 2 to Service Agreement
was entered into by Carrier and Parent on October 11, 1996; Amendment No. 3 to
Service Agreement was entered into on January 3, 1997; Amendment No. 4 to
Service Agreement was entered into on December 30, 1996; and Amendment No. 5 to
Service Agreement was entered into on March 26, 1997 (hereinafter, the "Prior
Amendments").  (The Original Agreement, as amended by the Prior Amendments, is
referred to herein as the "Agreement.")

         D.      Pursuant to this Amendment, Carrier and USOC desire to amend
the Agreement to more closely reflect the parties' intentions.

                                   AGREEMENT

         Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.      Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms used without definition
herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

         2.      Vendor Carrier Shortfalls.  Retroactively effective to January
1, 1997, USOC shall not be responsible to Carrier, either by way of payment or
offset, for any Vendor Carrier Shortfalls (as that term is defined in Amendment
No. 5 to Service Agreement).





                                       1
<PAGE>   2
         3.      Scope.  Except to the extent modified or amended herein, the
                 Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date first above written by their duly authorized representative.

US ONE COMMUNICATIONS                      PHOENIX NETWORK, INC.
SERVICES CORP.


By: /s/ J.H. Sturges                       By: /s/ Wallace M. Hammond 
   ------------------------------             ------------------------
Name: J. H. Sturges                        Name: Wallace M. Hammond
     ----------------------------          Title: President and CEO
Title: Chairman & CEO                      
      ---------------------------                                     





                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31057-31058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2808]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Notice

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

Date and Time: Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 10:30 a.m.-12 p.m.

Place: Corporation for National and Community Service; 8th Floor; 1201 
New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 
I. Chair's Opening Remarks.
II. Consideration of Prior Meeting's Minutes.
III. Committee Reports.
IV. Vote on Annual Update to Strategic Plan.
V. CEO Report.
VI. Public Comment.

[[Page 31058]]


Accommodations: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation 
should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5 p.m. on Monday, 
June 11, 2007.

Contact Person for More Information: Rachel Needle, Office of the CEO, 
Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10205, 
1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6742. 
Fax (202) 606-3460. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3918d8686878f86a3808d90cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="394b575c5c5d555c795a574a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 31, 2007.
Frank R. Trinity,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-2808 Filed 6-1-07; 1:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Former Liberian Regime of Charles Taylor

On July 22, 2004, by Executive Order 13348, I declared a national emergency and ordered related measures, including the blocking of property of certain persons associated with the former Liberian regime of Charles Taylor, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of former Liberian President Charles Taylor and other persons, in particular, their unlawful depletion of Liberian resources and their removal from Liberia and secreting of Liberian funds and property, which have undermined Liberia's transition to democracy and the orderly development of its political, administrative, and economic institutions and resources. I further noted that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed on August 18, 2003, and the related cease-fire had not yet been universally implemented throughout Liberia, and that the illicit trade in round logs and timber products was linked to the proliferation of and trafficking in illegal arms, which perpetuated the Liberian conflict and fueled and exacerbated other conflicts throughout West Africa.

Today, Liberia is engaged in a peaceful transition to a democratic order under the administration of President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf. The regulations implementing Executive Order 13348, clarify that the subject of this national emergency has been and remains limited to the former Liberian regime of Charles Taylor and specified other persons and not the country, citizens, Government, or Central Bank of Liberia.

Charles Taylor is today standing trial in The Hague by the Special Court for Sierra Leone. However, stability in Liberia is still fragile. The actions and policies of Charles Taylor and others have left a legacy of destruction that still has the potential to undermine Liberia's transformation and recovery.

Because the actions and policies of these persons continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on July 22, 2004, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond July 22, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergency Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13348. 

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                     

[FR Doc. 07-3595

Billing code 3195-01-P
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-41191

Summary Calendar

LESLIE SUNDELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

CISCO SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(G-96-CV-576)

March 20, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant, Leslie Sundell, filed suit against Cisco

Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Texas, Galveston Division. A few days after filing

such suit, and before service of process upon the defendant or any

answer by defendant, counsel for Sundell discovered that he had

erroneously drafted the original complaint for filing in the

Galveston Division when he had intended to file it in the Houston
2

Division. Several days later, counsel for the appellant filed a

motion to transfer the case from the Galveston Division to the

Houston Division. The district court denied such motion and

dismissed the suit without prejudice. 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(b), the district court has broad

discretion in deciding whether to transfer a civil action from a

division in which it is pending to any other division in the same

district. Likewise, under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the district court

is directed to dismiss a case which is filed in the wrong division

or district for venue purposes or to transfer such case to any

district or division in which it could have been properly brought.

We read § 1406 as again giving the district court discretion to

decide which course of action to follow.

We find nothing in the record of this case upon which we could

say the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, the

entry of final judgment without prejudice is 

AFFIRMED.
From: harmonys@netptc.net [mailto:harmonys@netptc.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Liz Threlkeld 

60002 Cascadel Dr. S. 

North Fork, CA 93643
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4243-4244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-378]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DoD-2006-PS-0151]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 1, 
2007.
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Trustee Report; DD Form 
2826; OMB Control Number 0730-0012.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 600.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 600.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 300.
    Needs and Uses: This form is used to report on the administration 
of the funds received on behalf of a mentally incompetent member of the 
uniformed services pursuant to 37 U.S.C. 602-604.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Office for DoD, Room 10236, new Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/

[[Page 4244]]

Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 
11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133.

    Dated: January 22, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-378 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```
§ 172.405 Authorized label modifications. ( a ) For Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, text indicating a hazard (for example FLAMMABLE LIQUID) is not required on a primary or subsidiary label.
( b ) For a package containing Oxygen, compressed, or Oxygen, refrigerated liquid, the OXIDIZER label specified in § 172.426 of this subpart, modified to display the word “OXYGEN” instead of “OXIDIZER”, and the class number “2” instead of “5.1”, may be used in place of the NON-FLAMMABLE GAS and OXIDIZER labels. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, the word “OXYGEN” must appear on the label.
( c ) For a package containing a Division 6.1, Packing Group III material, the POISON label specified in § 172.430 may be modified to display the text “PG III” instead of “POISON” or “TOXIC” below the mid line of the label. Also see § 172.313(d).
[Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52594, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66255, Dec. 20, 1991; 57 FR 45458, Oct. 1, 1992; 64 FR 10776, Mar. 5, 1999; 66 FR 33425, June 21, 2001]
DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

98-2452.

#### Clark v. Forney.

Sandusky App. No. S-97-053. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby allows the appeal. The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County, and the parties shall brief this case in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Cook, J.,

would hold this cause for the decision in 98-1462, *Waite v. Progressive Ins. Co.,*Huron App. No. H-97-036.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                       176
<INVENTORY>                                     37,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,495
<PP&E>                                          83,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,561
<SALES>                                        271,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,858
<CGS>                                          170,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,071
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.13
        

</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA
- 2012
- 1217 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2012
-NE
- 39
- AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### SP3213EN
- E **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : compliance time If other, explain : Commenter(s): 

### National Transportation Safety Board What change to the AD action is requested? 

### In clude a maximum number of allowable cycles for the No. 4 bearing internal scavenge tube. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### The NTSB is concerned that the current AD requirement to remove the internal scavenge tube at next combustor module level exposure has the potential to leave the tube installed indefinitely. Do we agree? No If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### the risk analy sis used for this AD includes the average intervals for cumbustor module level exposure at shop visit. The risk anal ys is also provides sufficient safety margin for expected variat ion in shop visit timing. **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change request ed or how is it justified?

### Page 2 of 3

Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because
**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 16, 1995 (46), Para 46.5 Adjournment of the House]
[Page 394]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.46.5  adjournment of the house

  Mr. LIVINGSTON, submitted the following privileged concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 41):

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That when the House adjourns on Thursday, March 
     16, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
     March 21, 1995.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution was 
agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
concurrent resolution.
```