alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.579 What must I do to mitigate internal corrosion? ( a ) *General.* If you transport any hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide that would corrode the pipeline, you must investigate the corrosive effect of the hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide on the pipeline and take adequate steps to mitigate internal corrosion.
( b ) *Inhibitors.* If you use corrosion inhibitors to mitigate internal corrosion, you must— ( 1 ) Use inhibitors in sufficient quantity to protect the entire part of the pipeline system that the inhibitors are designed to protect;
( 2 ) Use coupons or other monitoring equipment to determine the effectiveness of the inhibitors in mitigating internal corrosion; and
( 3 ) Examine the coupons or other monitoring equipment at least twice each calendar year, but with intervals not exceeding 71 ⁄ 2 months.
( c ) *Removing pipe.* Whenever you remove pipe from a pipeline, you must inspect the internal surface of the pipe for evidence of corrosion. If you find internal corrosion requiring corrective action under § 195.585, you must investigate circumferentially and longitudinally beyond the removed pipe (by visual examination, indirect method, or both) to determine whether additional corrosion requiring remedial action exists in the vicinity of the removed pipe.
( d ) *Breakout tanks.* After October 2, 2000, when you install a tank bottom lining in an aboveground breakout tank built to API Spec 12F (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3), API Std 620 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3), API Std 650 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3), or API Std 650's predecessor, Standard 12C, you must install the lining in accordance with API RP 652 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 195.3). However, you don't need to comply with API RP 652 when installing any tank for which you note in the corrosion control procedures established under § 195.402(c)(3) why compliance with all or certain provisions of API RP 652 is not necessary for the safety of the tank.
[Amdt. 195-73, 66 FR 67004, Dec. 27, 2001, as amended by Amdt. 195-99, 80 FR 188, Jan. 5, 2015]
§ 1108.28 Relief. ( a ) *Relief available.* Subject to the relief limits set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the arbitration panel under this subpart may grant relief in the form of monetary damages or a rate prescription.
( b ) *Relief limits.* Any relief awarded by the arbitration panel under this subpart shall not exceed $4 million (as indexed annually for inflation using the Producer Price Index and a 2007 base year) over two years, inclusive of prospective rate relief, reparations for past overcharges, or any combination thereof, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. Reparations or prescriptions may not be set below 180% of variable cost, as determined by unadjusted Uniform Railroad Costing System (URCS).
( c ) *Agreement to a different relief cap.* For an individual dispute, parties may agree by mutual written consent to arbitrate an amount above or below the monetary cap in paragraph (b) of this section, up to $25 million, or for shorter or longer than two years, but no longer than 5 years. Parties must inform the Board of such agreement in the confidential summary filed at the conclusion of the arbitration, as required by § 1108.29(e)(1).
( d ) *Relief not available.* No injunctive relief shall be available in arbitration proceedings under this part.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 23, 1995 (49), Para 49.18 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 481]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.49.18  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII:

       Mr. COLEMAN introduced a bill (H.R. 1315.) for the relief 
     of Kris Murty; which was referred to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
```
#### Allen S. Smith, Respondent, v. Charles Whitney, Appellant.

Judgment of Jefferson County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin. P. J.
# CONFIDENTIAL TS-S081U Y A ttachment 2 Page 1/1 

## Chemical structure diagram

CBI
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 15, 2014

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3427

___________ Shirley Novak, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * American Heyer-Schulte Corporation, * formerly known as Heyer-Schulte * Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; * American Hospital Supply Corporation, * an Illinois Corporation; * * Defendants, * * Baxter Healthcare Corporation, a * Appeals from the United States Delaware Corporation; Baxter * District Court for the District International, Inc., a Delaware * of Nebraska. Corporation; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants-Appellees, * * XYZ Corporation, 1-10, * * Defendant. *-2- __________ No. 98-3433

__________ Lacinda Geer, * * Appellant, * * v. * * American Heyer-Schulte Corporation, * formerly known as Heyer-Schulte * Corporation, A Delaware Corporation; * American Hospital Supply Corporation , * An Illinois Corporation; Baxte r * Healthcare Corporation, A Delaware * Corporation; Baxter International, Inc., * A Delaware Corporation; XYZ * Corporation, 1-10 , * * Appellees. *

__________ No. 98-3451

__________ Carla Love, * * Appellant, * * v. * * American Heyer-Schulte Corporation, * formerly known as Heyer-Schult e * Corporation, A Delaware Corporation; *-3- American Hospital Supply Corporation , * An Illinois Corporation; Baxter * Healthcare Corporation, A Delaware * Corporation; Baxter International, Inc., * A Delaware Corporation; XYZ * Corporation, 1-10 , * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 13, 1999 Filed: January 10, 2000

___________ Before MURPHY, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shirley Novak, Lacinda Geer, and Carla Love (collectively the appellants) appeal the district court's adverse grants of summary judgment in their product liability actions for personal injuries they suffered when they received silicon gel breast implants manufactured by American Heyer-Schulte Corporation. In reviewing the appellants' claims, the district court held Novak's and Geer's claims were barred by Nebraska's statutes of limitations and repose, Love's claim was barred by Texas's statute of limitations, and the district court also rejected the appellants' defenses to the statutes oflimitations and repose. We review a grant of summary judgment under a wellestablished standard. Because this is a diversity action, we review de novo questions of state law. Having considered the record and the parties briefs, we are satisfied the district court correctly applied the controlling state law and the record supports the district court's rulings. We also conclude a comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack precedential value. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's rulings without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-4-

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result and in the judgment in this case. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

|                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                           |  |
| Phillips 66 Company   By: /s/ John W. Wright    Name: John W. WrightTitle: | Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC By: /s/ Doss R. Bourgeois   Name: Doss R. BourgeoisTitle:   Executive Vice President, Exploration &           Production |
|                                                                                      |   |

----

|               |
|---------------|
|               |  |  |
| POSTING GROUP | BENCHMARK PRICE* | SPECIFIED GRAVITY (DEGREES API) |
| Buena Vista   | ******* | *****º |
| Midway Sunset | ***** | *****º |
| OCS           | ******* | *****º |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee, Mtg 08-01, Review R03s, Fs, Ks.                    

*Date:*                         October 11-12, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raj Krishnaraju, PhD, MS, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst. of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Dr. Rm 4AN 32J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4864,                         *kkrishna@nidcr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3901  Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
<TABLE>                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12
CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND
 PREFERRED DIVIDENDS

<CAPTION>                                             
                                                           Year Ended December 31,           
                                                1996       1995        1994        1993        1992
   Earnings:
<S>                                           <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
A.  Net Income                                $ 56,082   $ 52,722    $ 50,929    $ 50,390    $ 47,688
B.  Federal Income Tax                          31,068     28,687      26,806      27,158      24,363
C.   Earnings before Income Taxes             $ 87,150   $ 81,409    $ 77,735    $ 77,548    $ 72,051
D.  Total Fixed Charges <FN>                    27,231     30,433      32,679      33,820      34,888
E. Total Earnings                             $114,381   $111,842    $110,414    $111,368    $106,939

   Preferred Dividend Requirements:
F.  Allowance for Preferred Stock
     Dividends Under IRC Sec 247              $  3,231   $  4,903    $  5,127    $  5,562    $  5,544
G.  Less Allowable Dividend Deduction              127        528         528         528         544
H.  Net Subject to Gross-up                      3,104      4,375       4,599       5,034       5,000
I.  Ratio of Earnings before Income
     Taxes to Net Income (C/A)                   1.554      1.544       1.526       1.539       1.511
J.  Pref. Dividend (Pre-tax) (HxI)               4,824      6,755       7,018       7,747       7,555
K.  Plus Allowable Dividend Deduction              127        528         528         528         544
L. Preferred Dividend Factor                     4,951      7,283       7,546       8,275       8,099
M. Fixed Charges (D)                            27,231     30,433      32,679      33,820      34,888
N.  Total Fixed Charges
     and Preferred Dividends                  $ 32,182   $ 37,716    $ 40,225    $ 42,095    $ 42,987

O. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
    Charges (E/D)                                 4.20       3.68        3.38        3.29        3.07
P. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    and Preferred Dividends (E/N)                 3.55       2.97        2.74        2.65        2.49

      <FN1> Includes a portion of rent expense deemed to be representative of the interest factor.
</TABLE>
</PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Meeting notice for the Southwest Mississippi Resource Advisory Committee under Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393). 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is published in accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Meeting notice is hereby given for the Southwest Mississippi Resource Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000, Public Law 106-393. Topics to be discussed include: general information, possible Title II projects, and next meeting dates and agendas.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on July 12, 2007, from 6 p.m. and end at approximately 9 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Franklin County Library, 106 First Street, Meadville, MS 39653.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Bell Lunsford, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Homochitto National Forest, 1200 Highway 184 East, Meadville, MS 39653 (601-384-5876 ex. 154).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, Committee members, and elected officials. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. A public input session will be provided and individuals who made written requests by July 6, 2007, will have the opportunity to address the committee at that session. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Tim Reed, DFO, Homochitto National Forest, 1200 Highway 184 East, Meadville, MS 39653.

Dated: June 14, 2007.

Timothy O. Reed,

Designated Federal Officer.

 [FR Doc. 07-3106 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
#### § 176.148 Artificial lighting.

Electric lights, except arc lights, are the only form of artificial lighting permitted when loading and unloading Class 1 (explosive) materials.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.24 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1029]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.24  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       Mr. BATEMAN introduced a bill (H.R. 1911) for the relief of 
     Pauline Applewhite Saunders; which was referred to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
```
§ 176.405 Stowage of charcoal. ( a ) Before stowing charcoal Division 4.2 (flammable solid), UN 1361, NA 1361, or UN 1362 on a vessel for transportation, the hold or compartment in which it is to be stowed must be swept as clean as practicable. All residue of any former cargo, including especially a petroleum product, a vegetable or animal oil, nitrate, or sulfur, must be removed.
( b ) Charcoal packed in bags and offered for transportation on board a vessel in a quantity over 1016 kg (2240 pounds) must be loaded so that the bags are laid horizontally and stacked with space for efficient air circulation. If the bags are not compactly filled and closed to avoid free space within, vertical and horizontal dunnage strips must be laid between the bags. Space for ventilating must be maintained near bulkheads, the shell of the vessel, the deck, and the overhead. No more than 40,600 kg (89,508 pounds) of charcoal may be stowed in a hold or compartment when other stowage space is available. If the unavailability of hold or compartment space requires the stowage of a larger amount, the arrangement of the stow for ventilation must be adjusted to ensure a sufficient venting effect.
( c ) Any loose material from bags broken during loading must be removed. Broken bags may be repacked or have the closures repaired and the repaired bags restowed.
( d ) Charcoal “screenings” packed in bags must be stowed to provide spaces for air circulation between tiers regardless of the quantity stowed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: pb@purplecat.net [mailto:pb@purplecat.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:56 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Brezny 

40 Highland St 

Asheville, NC 28801
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 25, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00048

- CV

Buddy CASTEEL and Jaret Brandon Casteel

, Appellants

v.

Amelia STAYTON

, Appellee

From the County Court

, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 0138

- CC

Honorable Garry A. Merritt , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that costs shall be assessed against appellant.

It is so ORDERED on March 25, 2015

.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of March, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

FRANK TOCCI,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 10356

D.C. No. 2:17

- cr

- 00194

- LRH

- PAL

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 1 7 , 2019 **

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Frank Tocci appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

45

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for being a felon

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).

We have jurisdiction und er 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without o ral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 10356

Tocci contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the

court’s reasons for varying upward lacked evidentiary support and both the

government and the probation officer had recommended a within

- Guideli nes

sentence . The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States

, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The court was not bound by the parties’ sentencing

recommendations, and the record reflects that the court varied upward largely

because of Tocci’s criminal history. To the extent the court relied on Tocci’s

conduct while in custody and the circumstances of the offense in imposing the

sentence , the undisputed portions of the presentence report supported the court’s

findings

. See United Stat es v. Ameline , 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir. 2005) (en

banc). The above

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances

. See

Gall , 552 U.S. at 51.

Insofar as Tocci argues that the district court violated Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 32 at sentencing, we d ecline to reach that issue, which Tocci

raised for the first time in his reply brief. See United States v. Kama , 394 F.3d

1236, 1238 (9th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
-----Original Message----- 

From: uppekka@hotmail.com [mailto:uppekka@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

ted frisbie 

166 ute trail 

carbondale, CO 81623