alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    439,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               439,637
<PP&E>                                         461,418
<DEPRECIATION>                               (353,504)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 549,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,810,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       536,396
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,790,425)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   549,401
<SALES>                                        331,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               831,900
<CGS>                                          228,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,007,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (213,016)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (213,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (213,016)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Nathaniel M. White, as Trustee, etc., Respondent, v. Ira Betts, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: saydam@earthlink.net [mailto:saydam@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cem Saydam 

4716 Clear Stream Ct 

Charlotte, NC 28269
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0626(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0626(04)

**Notice to importers — Imports of sugar into the Community from countries in the western Balkans **

*
Official Journal C 152 , 26/06/2002 P. 0014 - 0014 *

Notice to importers

Imports of sugar into the Community from countries in the western Balkans

(2002/C 152/05)

The European Commission informs the Community operators that there is reasonable doubt as to the proper application of the preferential arrangements for sugar of headings CN 1701 and CN 1702, which is declared at import as originating in Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, including Kosovo as defined by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in order to benefit from preferential tariff measures.

A significant and rapid increase in preferential imports of sugar into the Community from certain countries in the western Balkans has been registered since the beginning of 2001, while the countries concerned have in the recent past shown a deficit in sugar production. At the same time, exports of sugar from the Community to the countries in the region have increased by roughly the same level. This development of trade in both directions appears to be highly artificial and there are indications pointing to the possibility of fraud.

Community operators presenting documentary evidence of origin with a view to securing preferential treatment for sugar of tariff headings CN 1701 and CN 1702 are therefore advised to take all the necessary precautions, since the release of the goods in question for free circulation may give rise to a customs debt and lead to fraud against the Community's financial interests.
#### § 172.503 Identification number display on placards.

For procedures and limitations pertaining to the display of identification numbers on placards, see § 172.334.

[Amdt. 172-58, 45 FR 34701, May 22, 1980]
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Heine Safety Boiler Company, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against The Franklin Boiler Works Company, Respondent.

*Matter of Heine Safety Boiler Co.,*138 App. Div. 933, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 17, 1910;

decided November 29, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 25, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent herein to permit an inspection of its books.

*Ransom H. Gillet*for appellant.

*Amasa J.*Parker, *Jr.,*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
§ 179.300-18 Stamping. ( a ) To certify that the tank complies with all specification requirements, each tank shall be plainly and permanently stamped in letters and figures 3 ⁄ 8 inch high into the metal of valve end chime as follows: ( 1 ) DOT Specification number.
( 2 ) Material and cladding material if any (immediately below the specification number).
( 3 ) Owner's or builder's identifying symbol and serial number (immediately below the material identification). The symbol shall be registered with the Bureau of Explosives, duplications are not authorized.
( 4 ) Inspector's official mark (immediately below the owner's or builder's symbol).
( 5 ) Date of original tank test (month and year, such as 1-64 for January 1964). This should be so placed that dates of subsequent tests may easily be added thereto.
( 6 ) Water capacity—0000 pounds.
( b ) A copy of the above stamping in letters and figures of the prescribed size stamped on a brass plate secured to one of the tank heads is authorized.
From: paul.excoffier@gmail.com [mailto:paul.excoffier@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Excoffier 

5307 Saddleback Ct. 

El Sobrante, CA 94803
§ 191.25 Filing safety-related condition reports. ( a ) Each report of a safety-related condition under § 191.23(a)(1) through (9) must be filed (received by the Associate Administrator) in writing within 5 working days (not including Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holidays) after the day a representative of an operator first determines that the condition exists, but not later than 10 working days after the day a representative of an operator discovers the condition. Separate conditions may be described in a single report if they are closely related. Reporting methods and report requirements are described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) Each report of a maximum allowable operating pressure exceedance meeting the requirements of criteria in § 191.23(a)(10) for a gas transmission pipeline must be filed (received by the Associate Administrator) in writing within 5 calendar days of the exceedance using the reporting methods and report requirements described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) Reports must be filed by email to *InformationResourcesManager@dot.gov* or by facsimile to (202) 366-7128. For a report made pursuant to § 191.23(a)(1) through (9), the report must be headed “Safety-Related Condition Report.” For a report made pursuant to § 191.23(a)(10), the report must be headed “Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Exceedances.” All reports must provide the following information: ( 1 ) Name, principal address, and operator identification number (OPID) of the operator.
( 2 ) Date of report.
( 3 ) Name, job title, and business telephone number of person submitting the report.
( 4 ) Name, job title, and business telephone number of person who determined that the condition exists.
( 5 ) Date condition was discovered and date condition was first determined to exist.
( 6 ) Location of condition, with reference to the State (and town, city, or county) or offshore site, and as appropriate, nearest street address, offshore platform, survey station number, milepost, landmark, or name of pipeline.
( 7 ) Description of the condition, including circumstances leading to its discovery, any significant effects of the condition on safety, and the name of the commodity transported or stored.
( 8 ) The corrective action taken (including reduction of pressure or shutdown) before the report is submitted and the planned follow-up or future corrective action, including the anticipated schedule for starting and concluding such action.
[Amdt. 191-26, 84 FR 52242, Oct. 1, 2019]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 15, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 15, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0129. MICHAEL HILLIARD, JR. v. JENNIFER JENNINGS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SPDR2001495
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Bumgardner Argued at Richmond, Virginia

GARY W. WRIGHT, S/K/A GARY WALTER WRIGHT MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0672-97-3 JUDGE SAM W. COLEMAN III FEBRUARY 24, 1998 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF AUGUSTA COUNTY Thomas H. Wood, Judge Robert T. Garnett, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Linwood T. Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General (Richard Cullen, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Gary W. Wright was convicted in a bench trial for breaking and entering a dwelling with the intent to commit larceny therein in violation of Code § 18.2-91. The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to identify Wright as the person who broke into and entered the dwelling. Finding the evidence sufficient, we affirm the conviction. When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly

deducible therefrom. Martin v. Commonwealth , 4 Va. App. 438, 443, 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987). Viewed accordingly, the evidence proved that David Walker

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - vacated his house after it was damaged by flood waters. Late one afternoon, he returned to inspect the house. Walker testified that he looked through a window and saw Gary W. Wright walking around the inside of the house. A few minutes later, he saw Wright and another man walking between his house and a vacant house next door. Walker inspected his house and found that the back door which he had secured with boards had been forcibly opened. Walker entered the house and determined that a sewing machine was missing. He also noticed that a step ladder and a can of construction material had been placed under a ceiling fan in the living room. Walker testified that he had known Wright for twenty years and that he was certain that Wright was the man he had seen walking through the house. Appellant contends that Walker was mistaken in identifying Wright as the person inside the house because he only saw the intruder for "a couple of seconds" and his ability to see into the house would have been impaired by the bright afternoon sunlight. However, the trial court, sitting as the finder of fact, believed Walker's testimony. "The trial judge's determination of the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony are questions exclusively within the province of the [trier of fact]." Long v. Commonwealth , 8 Va. App. 194, 199, 379 S.E.2d 473, 476 (1989) (alteration in original) (citation omitted). The Commonwealth's evidence was competent, was not inherently incredible, and is sufficient to- 3 - support beyond a reasonable doubt the trial court's conclusion that Wright was guilty of breaking and entering Walker's house with the intent to commit a larceny therein. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Franklin Credit Management Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan Joseph, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Alan Joseph
-------------------------
Alan Joseph
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
## C ONSERVATION 

## C OUNCIL FOR 

## H AWAI 

## ‘ I

Hawai‘i’s Voice for Wildlife

– Ko Leo Hawai‘i no na holoholona lohiu

Telephone/Fax 808.593.0255 • email: info@conservehi.org • web: www@conservehi.org

P.O. Box 2923 • Honolulu, HI 96802 • Office: 2 50 Ward Ave., Suite 212 • Honolulu, HI 96814

President: Maura O’Connor * Vice

- President: Hannah Springer * Treasurer: Kim Ramos * Secretary: Rick Barboza
Directors: Madelyn D’Enbeau * Maka‘ala Ka‘aumoana * Julie Leialoha

Executive Director: Marj orie Ziegler To: U.S. Department of Transportation

Subject: Comments In Support of Act 173 and Agricultural Inspection Fees in Hawai‘i

Date: October 29, 2010

Aloha. The Conservation Council for Hawai‘i strongly supports Hawai‘i Act 173 of 2008, which allo ws the Hawai‘i Department of Agriculture to charge 50 cents on every 1,000 lbs of incoming cargo to support
invasive species prevention services at our ports of entry. Invasive species are one of the most serious

threats our environment, economy, culture, and quality of life. Invasive species affect nearly every
Hawai‘i resident and visitor, every ecosystem from coral reefs to mountain summits, and every aspect of

our lives such as the availability of potable water, and the use and enjoyment of public la nds and beaches.

Hawai‘i is the “endangered species capital” of the nation. Nearly a third of the nation’s threatened and

endangered birds are known only from the Hawaiian Islands, and over a third of the nation’s threatened
and endangered plants are uniq ue to Hawai‘i. More plant and bird extinctions have been documented in

Hawai‘i than anywhere else in the country. This is not a record that we are proud of. Environmental and
Native Hawaiian organizations, scientists, concerned citizens, government agen cies, and elected officials

have spent countless hours trying to mitigate the invasive species crisis in Hawai‘i.

Act 173 is one of the most important steps taken to prevent invasive species introductions at our ports of
entry. Ensuring that incoming car go is adequately inspected and pest free is part of doing business in the

islands, and must be enforced. It is far more cost

- effective to prevent invasive species introductions than
to try and control them once they are established. Maritime cargo compan ies have been paying into the

inspection fee program , but most of the airlines have not. In litigation involving proposed runway
extension at the Kahului Airport, invasive species introduced to Maui via the airport not only impacted

rare and endangered s pecies near the airport, but also threatened speci es at Haleakala National Park. We
do not appreciate the increased threat to our environment and quality of life posed by the airlines’ lack

of cooperation and violation of state law.

Thank you for opp ortunity to comment.

Marjorie Ziegler

cc: Senator Daniel K. Inouye

Senator Daniel K. Akaka

Representative Mazie Hirono
Representative Charles Djou

Federal Aviation Administration
Hawai‘i Department of Transportation

Hawai‘i Department of Agriculture
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.313 Bends and elbows. ( a ) Each field bend in steel pipe, other than a wrinkle bend made in accordance with § 192.315, must comply with the following: ( 1 ) A bend must not impair the serviceability of the pipe.
( 2 ) Each bend must have a smooth contour and be free from buckling, cracks, or any other mechanical damage.
( 3 ) On pipe containing a longitudinal weld, the longitudinal weld must be as near as practicable to the neutral axis of the bend unless: ( i ) The bend is made with an internal bending mandrel; or
( ii ) The pipe is 12 inches (305 millimeters) or less in outside diameter or has a diameter to wall thickness ratio less than 70.
( b ) Each circumferential weld of steel pipe which is located where the stress during bending causes a permanent deformation in the pipe must be nondestructively tested either before or after the bending process.
( c ) Wrought-steel welding elbows and transverse segments of these elbows may not be used for changes in direction on steel pipe that is 2 inches (51 millimeters) or more in diameter unless the arc length, as measured along the crotch, is at least 1 inch (25 millimeters).
( d ) An operator may not install plastic pipe with a bend radius that is less than the minimum bend radius specified by the manufacturer for the diameter of the pipe being installed.
[Amdt. 192-26, 41 FR 26018, June 24, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 192-29, 42 FR 42866, Aug. 25, 1977; Amdt. 192-29, 42 FR 60148, Nov. 25, 1977; Amdt. 192-49, 50 FR 13225, Apr. 3, 1985; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37503, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58718, Nov. 20, 2018]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2091

To exclude certain veterans’ compensation and pension amounts from consideration as adjusted income for purposes of determining the amount

of rent paid by a family for a dwelling unit assisted under the United

States Housing Act of 1937.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1995

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To exclude certain veterans’ compensation and pension

amounts from consideration as adjusted income for purposes of determining the amount of rent paid by a family

for a dwelling unit assisted under the United States

Housing Act of 1937.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Equity Act

5 of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2091 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME.

2 Notwithstanding section 3 of the United States

3 Housing Act of 1937, for purposes of determining the

4 amount of rent paid by a family for occupancy of a public

5 housing dwelling unit or a dwelling unit assisted under

6 section 8 of such Act, the adjusted income of a family shall

7 not be considered to include any amounts received by the

8 family from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as—

9 (1) compensation, as defined in section 101(13)

10 of title 38, United States Code;

11 (2) dependency and indemnity compensation, as

12 defined in section 101(14) of such title; or

13 (3) pension, as defined in section 101(15) of

14 such title.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: sandtiger@verizon.net [mailto:sandtiger@verizon.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:07 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca Hargrove 

112 Ramunno Circle 

Hockessin, DE 19707