alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: ilenem_1@yahoo.com [mailto:ilenem_1@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Debra Moore 

10370 Evelyn Drive 

Clio, MI 48420
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**





I,
      Wang,
      Xiao Jun, Chief Financial Officer certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dark Dynamite, Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and





Date:
      April 15, 2006





/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCAIL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1996, 10KSB AND IS QUAILIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<CURRENCY>                                                   U.S. Dollars
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                     3.00
<CASH>                                                         1,967,964
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                113,610,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (23,604,810)
<INVENTORY>                                                    4,737,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                           640,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                83,277,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         79,174,128
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                          11,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  83,277,148
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              14,051,911
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 12,616,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 513,372
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             7,338,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,435,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     606,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     829,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.72


</TABLE>
### Aug. 30. 2011 4:49PM Jeff Fortenberry Congressional 

### No. 

### 3639 P. i JEFF FORTENBERRY

liT DISTRICT. NeOllAlKA
COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMlmeON OVERSiGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

### ~ongte~~ 

# of tbe anltt))**~tattj** 

## ]}louse of**31\epteg'entatibe~** August 30, 2011

The Honorable Dr. Steven Chu Secretary ofEnergy U.S. Department ofEnergy 1000 Independence Avenue. SW Washington, DC 20585
Deal' Secretary Chu:
I 

### am wliting to you regarding energy efficiency standards to be proposed by the Department ofEnergy. WASHINGTON Q£W; 1635 LONGWORlM House OrncE DU'LO"'G WASHINGTON. DC 2"616 (2021 225-48(1&**lIIJCQW~** 301 Soum 13TH STRUT SUll-a 100 L,NCOLN. NE 811608

(4021 43&-t698 lIIWJl!IIIl££IJ:£: 829 NOlllM BROAD STAIU

"RIMONT, NE 68026

(4021**'21~888** WlIIfQILmEII:e McM'lL BUlI.CIII<G 125 SoU"Ot 4nt SlAIeT

NQRFOuc, NE IIB101

(402131,..2064 www./louso.gov/fortenberIY

While 

### I am supportive ofthe overall goal ofpromoting energy efficiency, 

### I am very concerned about a proposed definition 

### in Department ofEnergy's Preliminary Technical SUpport Document: IIEnergy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Battery Charges and External Power Supplies." Specifically, I am very concerned about the proposed classification ofgolfbattery charging systems as consumerproducts, 

### an issue that directly impacts more than 100jobs in Lincoln, Nebraska,
It is 

### my understanding that about 90 percent ofnew golfcal'S are sold to businesses for fleets 

### while less than ten percent of

### new golfcars are for personal use by individuals. Quite simply. this does not meet the "significant extent" standard necessary to be considered a consumerproduct.
I 

### am concel'lled that this proposed change would have limited 

### or no actual benefit while jeopardizing U.S. jobs since production ofthese pl'oducts would likely shift overseas, I urge you to consider revising the proposal to ensure that golfcars are classified as non-consumer products in the energy conservation standards,
Thank you for conSidering these comments,

JeffFOl1enberry Member ofCongress

cc: Dr. Hemy Kelly. Assistant Secretary, Office ofEnergy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
-----Original Message----- 

From: mjbr@windstream.net [mailto:mjbr@windstream.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

 I support a strong rule that would prohibit insurance companies from 

charging copayments, deductibles, and other out of pocket expenses for 

any health treatments. In other words, single payer. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Brigmon 

1284 Lakeview Canyon Road 

Ashville, AL 35953
-----Original Message----- 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

 

 

April 24, 2010 

 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Diana Cancel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                        9,600,824
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 345,148
<ALLOWANCES>                  416,868
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              11,538,526
<PP&E>                        39,275,000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                50,813,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         762,130
<BONDS>                       31,025,000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   15,731
<OTHER-SE>                    19,010,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  50,813,526
<SALES>                       4,886,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              8,171,989
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 2,448,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              3,563,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>              7,572,838
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2,249,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (7,594,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           000
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (7,594,087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (107.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (107.02)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8535]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Piero della Francesca: Personal Encounters''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Piero della Francesca: Personal 
Encounters,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with foreign owners or custodians. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about January 13, 
2014, until on or about March 30, 2014, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 20, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-28497 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
§ 1542.303 Security Directives and Information Circulars. ( a ) TSA may issue an Information Circular to notify airport operators of security concerns. When TSA determines that additional security measures are necessary to respond to a threat assessment or to a specific threat against civil aviation, TSA issues a Security Directive setting forth mandatory measures.
( b ) Each airport operator must comply with each Security Directive issued to the airport operator within the time prescribed in the Security Directive.
( c ) Each airport operator that receives a Security Directive must— ( 1 ) Within the time prescribed in the Security Directive, verbally acknowledge receipt of the Security Directive to TSA.
( 2 ) Within the time prescribed in the Security Directive, specify the method by which the measures in the Security Directive have been implemented (or will be implemented, if the Security Directive is not yet effective).
( d ) In the event that the airport operator is unable to implement the measures in the Security Directive, the airport operator must submit proposed alternative measures and the basis for submitting the alternative measures to TSA for approval. The airport operator must submit the proposed alternative measures within the time prescribed in the Security Directive. The airport operator must implement any alternative measures approved by TSA.
( e ) Each airport operator that receives a Security Directive may comment on the Security Directive by submitting data, views, or arguments in writing to TSA. TSA may amend the Security Directive based on comments received. Submission of a comment does not delay the effective date of the Security Directive.
( f ) Each airport operator that receives a Security Directive or an Information Circular and each person who receives information from a Security Directive or an Information Circular must: ( 1 ) Restrict the availability of the Security Directive or Information Circular, and information contained in either document, to those persons with an operational need-to-know.
( 2 ) Refuse to release the Security Directive or Information Circular, and information contained in either document, to persons other than those who have an operational need to know without the prior written consent of TSA.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 31, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1791

AN ACT

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to

physicians’ services.make certain technical corrections relating to
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1791

AN ACT

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to make

certain technical corrections relating to physicians’ services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1791 EH

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO PHY2 SICIANS’ SERVICES.

3 (a) CORRECTING REFERENCE TO UNIQUE IDENTI4 FIER SYSTEM.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended,

7 in the paragraph redesignated as paragraph (59) by

8 section 13623(a)(6) of the Omnibus Budget Rec9 onciliation Act of 1993 and inserted by section

10 4752(c)(1)(C) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation

11 Act of 1990, by striking ‘‘subsection (v)’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘subsection (x)’’.

13 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

14 by paragraph (1) shall be effective as if included in

15 the enactment of the amendments made by section

16 4752(c)(1) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation

17 Act of 1990.

18 (b) CORRECTION IN MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS FOR

19 BILLING FOR PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND

20 PREGNANT WOMEN.—

21 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1903(i) of the Social

22 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(i)) is amended, in

23 the paragraph redesignated as paragraph (12) by

24 section 13631(c)(3) of the Omnibus Budget Rec25 onciliation Act of 1993 and inserted by section
3

•HR 1791 EH

1 4752(a)(2)(B) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcili2 ation Act of 1990—

3 (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by inserting

4 ‘‘or is certified in family practice or pediatrics

5 by the medical specialty board recognized by

6 the American Osteopathic Association’’ before

7 the comma at the end;

8 (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting

9 ‘‘or is certified in family practice or obstetrics

10 by the medical specialty board recognized by

11 the American Osteopathic Association’’ before

12 the comma at the end; and

13 (C) in each of subparagraphs (A) and

14 (B)—

15 (i) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of

16 clause (v),

17 (ii) in clause (vi), by inserting ‘‘(or

18 certified by the State in accordance with

19 policies of the Secretary)’’ after ‘‘Sec20 retary’’,

21 (iii) by redesignating clause (vi) as

22 clause (vii), and

23 (iv) by inserting after clause (v) the

24 following new clause:
4

•HR 1791 EH

1 ‘‘(vi) delivers such services in the

2 emergency department of a hospital par3 ticipating in the State plan approved under

4 this title, or’’.

5 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

6 by paragraph (1) shall apply to physicians’ services

7 furnished on or after January 1, 1992.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1536 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1536

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 11 (legislative day, October 10), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend for two years an 
expiring authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs with respect to 
   determination of locality salaries for certain nurse anesthetist 
            positions in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 7451(d)(3)(C)(iii) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking out ``April 1, 1995'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``December 31, 1997''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 502.10 Waiver of rules in this part.

Except to the extent that such waiver would be inconsistent with any statute, any of the rules in this part, except §§ 502.11 and 502.221, may be waived by the Commission or the presiding officer in any particular case to prevent undue hardship, manifest injustice, or if the expeditious conduct of business so requires. [Rule 10.]

[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 81 FR 93835, Dec. 22, 2016]
COÖS.

#### Paine *v. Grand Trunk*Railway.

Case, tried by jury in April, 1878. Reserved questions of law were decided at the law term, March, 1879, 58 N. H. 611. Judgment was rendered on the verdict for the plaintiff in April, 1879, and at the same time the defendants moved that the action be brought forward for review.

*Ray, Drew Sf Jordan,*for the defendants.

*Ttoiichell*and *Ladd Sf Fletcher,*for the plaintiff.

Doe, C. J.

For some purposes, a review is a new action. *Haven*v. *Libbey,*Smith (N. H.) 109; *Barker*v. *Barker,*39 N. H. 408, 409; *Cahoon*v. *Coe,*57 N. H. 556, 599; *Camp*v. *Hilliard,*58 N. H. 42; *Page*v. *Brewster,*58 N. H. 126. But it is settled that the right of review in such cases as this is not affected by *e.*64 of Laws of 1878. *Rowell*v. *B. & M. R. R., ante,*p. 35.

*Motion granted.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.