alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending August 27, 2011

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|CLINTON BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC            | Retroactive change in control notice by Paul K. Steen, Edina, Minnesota, and James R. Steen, Fargo, North Dakota, to each retain 25% or more of the shares of Clinton Bancshares, Inc., Clinton, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Clinton State Bank, Clinton, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/13/2011 
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | 09/13/2011    
|MERCHANTS STATE BANK     | * Branch       | Merchants State Bank, Freeman, South Dakota, to establish a de novo branch in Irene, South Dakota.                                                                                                                                                                                           | Newspaper:09/08/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 09/08/2011    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 10.4


 


[Cree, Inc. Letterhead]







September 5, 2013







Mr. Randy N. McCullough


Chief Executive Officer


Charles & Colvard, Ltd.


300 Perimeter Park, Suite A


Morrisville, North Carolina 27560







Dear Randy:







This document (the “Second Amendment”) serves as an amendment to the letter agreement between Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (“C&C”) and Cree, Inc. (“Cree”) dated March 22, 2010 (the “2010 Agreement”) and previously amended by the letter dated February 1, 2013 (the “First Amendment”) (collectively, the “Letter Agreement”).  Except as expressly set forth in the Letter Agreement, as modified herein, the supply and purchase of SiC Materials will be governed in all respects by the terms and conditions of the parties’ Amended and Restated Exclusive Supply Agreement dated June 6, 1997 (the “Supply Agreement,” as amended).  Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined herein shall have the meanings specified in the Letter Agreement or the Supply Agreement, as the case may be.








	1.	Cree will supply SiC production crystals to C&C, and C&C will purchase SiC production crystals from Cree, according to the terms stated in the Letter Agreement, as modified herein.











	2.	Cree will provide 1.5” SiC production crystals for sale to C&C for $$[****]/gram for Grade 10 and $[****]/gram for Grade 20.  Cree may fulfill C&C’s outstanding purchase orders [****] as agreed.  All delivered orders [****] will be applied toward C&C’s outstanding purchase orders [****] and its New Order requirements in paragraph 2 of the First Amendment.  The quantity of "usable material" in 1.5” crystals delivered to C&C pursuant to the Letter Agreement will be graded according to the specifications in Attachment A of the 2010 Agreement.










The contents of this Second Amendment will be considered "Confidential Information" of each parry subject to the provisions of Section 5 of the Supply Agreement.  No amendment or modification of this Second Amendment or the Letter Agreement shall be effective unless reduced to writing and executed by an authorized representative of each party hereto.  Except as modified by this Second Amendment, the Letter Agreement and the Supply Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms and conditions.







If the foregoing terms and conditions meet with your approval, please execute this Second Amendment where indicated below and return a signed copy to my attention via fax at (919) [****] or via email at [****].


 


	
Regards,

	
 

	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:


	
 

	
 

	
CHARLES & COLVARD, LTD.










	
/s/ David T. Emerson

	
 

		
 

	
	
David T. Emerson

	
 

	By:	
/s/ Randy N. McCullough

	
	
Vice President – Chips and Materials

	
 

		
Randy N. McCullough, CEO










[****] Confidential treatment requested pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Omitted portions have been separately filed with the Commission.
#### Snedden v. Harmes.

Assignment of Accounts — Splitting Demands.

An assignment of a part of a demand can be made only with the consent of the debtor.

*Error to the County Court of Huerfano County.*

Mr. H. A. Cole, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. R. R. Ross and Mr. Henry B. Babb, for defendant in error.

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error sued Henry Doerffler for a debt, and caused Fred E. Cowing to be summoned as garnishee. The defendant in error intervened, claiming that 194.20 of the money attached in the hands of Cowing belonged to him, having been assigned to him by Doerffler. The intervenor had judgment for the amount of his claim.

The intervenor’s title to the money depends upon the alleged assignment. The amount owing by Cowing to Doerf*478tier was $143. If there wás an assignment, it embraced only a part of the demand. Such an assignment can be made only with the consent of the party from whom the money is due. It is not allowable to a creditor to split up his cause of action by assigning parts of it, thus creating as many new causes of action as there are assignments, without the concurrence of the debtor. *Insurance Co. v.*Bullene, 51 Kan. 764; *Welch v.*Mayer, 4 Colo. App. 440. There was no pretense that Cowing ever consented, directly or indirectly, to this alleged assignment.

The only evidence introduced in support of the allegation that the money was assigned to Harmes consisted of three checks, one for $33.00, one for $27.00, one for $34.30, drawn by Doerffler in favor of Harmes, upon Walsen & Wheeler’s Bank at Walsenburg. The checks were never presented for payment. From some obscure statements in the record it may be gathered that when the checks were drawn there was some kind of a check in the bank payable to Cowing, and awaiting his indorsement in order to be converted into monejr, out of which the amount due Doerffler was to come; and that it was Doerffier’s intention by the checks upon the bank to transfer a portion of this fund. It is upon this supposed intention that counsel for the intervenor rests his argument. We know of nothing more useless for any purpose than a naked intention. The checks could not operate as a transfer of anything except money to Doerffler’s credit in the bank. No intention, however well defined, or distinctly expressed, could convert them into an assignment of the debt due from Cowing to Doerffler. The intervenor had no standing below, and he has none here.

The judgment will be reversed.

*Reversed.*
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Tennyson, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Tennyson*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 49.]

(No. 98-1127

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Jonathan P. Dameron,*for appellant.

*50The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The court of appeals is directed to lift the stay of execution of sentence.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

OSCAR TERRETO CARTY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 385 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 12, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Louis W. Haight, Respondent, *v.*Alberto de Verastegui, Appellant.

*Haight*v. *de Verastegui,*133 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

(Argued October 13, 1910;

decided October 28, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 23, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover on contract.

*Allcm G. Howe*for appellant.

*John J. Hughes*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gbay, Webneb, Willabd Babtlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
From: cjschell@peoplepc.com [mailto:cjschell@peoplepc.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I believe that mental health is integral to good physical health. I am 

writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. To 

have excellent physical health care one needs also to have access to 

good mental health care. 

Sincerely, 

Catherine Schell 

78 Coburn Woods 

Nashua, NH 03063
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.35 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1977]
[Page 1123]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.35  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1977

  Ms. PRYCE, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-184) the resolution (H. Res. 187) providing consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1977) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1996, and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from Moto Photo
Inc's 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,868,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,089,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,626,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,649,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,962,823
<PP&E>                                       3,578,845
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,246,588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,701,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,391,801
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        78,252
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,048,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,701,008
<SALES>                                     21,809,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,385,500
<CGS>                                       11,868,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,930,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,631,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               298,646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             314,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                770,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            770,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   770,093
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 15, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: Rosequirk@mchsi.com [mailto:Rosequirk@mchsi.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rose Quirk 

4150 Aspen Ct. 

Waterloo, IA 50701
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Income Growth Management, Inc., a California corporation
and the General Partner of Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited
partnership, does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Income
Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited partnership, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of. Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited
partnership.

Date: March 29, 2004                 /s/ David W. Maurer
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      David W. Maurer, Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 29, 2004                 /s/ Timothy C. Maurer
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Timothy C. Maurer, Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2422 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2422

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   2300 Scenic Drive in Georgetown, Texas, as the ``Kile G. West Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KILE G. WEST POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2300 Scenic Drive in Georgetown, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Kile  G. West Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kile G. 
West Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Revised toxics rule RIA chapters 

 Larry Sorrels 

 to: cortney_higgins 

 03/14/2011 07:00 PM 

 Cc: Ron Evans, RobertJ Wayland, Bill Maxwell, Lydia Wegman, Peter 

Tsirigotis, Neal Fann, Bryan Hubbell, Jeb Stenhouse, Sam Napolitano 

 

Cortney, 

Attached are redline/strikeout and clean versions of Chapters 1, 2, 6, 

11, and Appendix D of the toxics rule RIA. Revisions have been made to 

the version sent to you last Friday, and reflect responses to OMB 

comments and edits to the benefits analysis. Most revisions are minor 

in nature. 

Thank you. 

Chapter1Exec SummaryToxicsRuleRIA3-14OMBredlinestrikeout2.docx 

Chapter1Exec SummaryToxicsRuleRIA3-14OMBclean2.docx 

Chapter2IntroductionToxicsRuleRIA3-14OMBreviewredlinestrikeout2.docx 

Chapter2IntroductionToxicsRuleRIA3-14OMBreviewclean2.docx 

Chapter6co-benefitstoxicsruleRIA3-14OMBredlinestrikeout.docx 

Chapter6co-benefitstoxicsruleRIA3-14OMBclean.docx 

Appendix D - Co-Benefits Appendix to Toxics rule 3-

14redlinestrikeoutOMBreview.docx 

Appendix D - Co-Benefits Appendix to Toxics rule 3-14OMBclean.docx 

CHAPTER 11benefit-costcomparisonToxicsRuleRIA_3-14OMBredlinestrikeout2.docx 

CHAPTER 11benefit-costcomparisonToxicsRuleRIA_3-14OMBclean.docx 

Larry SorrelsUS EPA/OAQPS/HEID/AEG 

RTP, NC 27711 

919-541-5041 

919-541-0839 (fax) 

C439-02 

Room No. C445-A
#### Harvey Lichfield, *as Commissioner of Highways, etc., Appellant, v.*Thomas Fitzgerald, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. *Held,*that the defects in the undertaking delivered to the justice were waived by the defendant.
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-30320, 333-24749, 333-128594, and 333-155405) and Form
S-3 (File No. 333-148227) of Pressure BioSciences, Inc. (formerly Boston
Biomedica, Inc.) of our report dated March 31, 2010,  relating to the
consolidated financial statements which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pressure
BioSciences, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ UHY
LLP





Boston,
Massachusetts


March 31,
2010