alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 15, 2013

|Filer                                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANKSHARES CORPORATION | * 3A1         | Virginia National Bankshares Corporation, Charlottesville, Virginia, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of Virginia National Bank, Charlottesville, Virginia. | Newspaper:06/17/2013Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                               | 06/17/2013   
|Federal Register:                        | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1638 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1638

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that 
 petitioners for immigration classification on the basis of immediate 
relative status to a citizen shall be required to pay only one fee when 
              such petitioners are filed at the same time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 1995

  Mr. Dornan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that 
 petitioners for immigration classification on the basis of immediate 
relative status to a citizen shall be required to pay only one fee when 
              such petitioners are filed at the same time.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEES FOR IMMEDIATE RELATIVE PETITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 204(a)(1)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(A)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new clause:
    ``(v) If an individual files one or more petitions under this 
subparagraph on behalf of more than one alien at the same time, the fee 
for filing all such petitions or aliens shall be the same as the fee 
for filing such one petition on behalf of one alien.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to petitions filed on or after the first day of the first month 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
98-1808.

#### Richey v. Johnson & Hardin Co.

Hamilton App. No. C-970767. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-2723, *Johnson v. BP Chem., Inc.,*Allen App. No. 1-97-32; briefing schedule stayed.

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 13, 1995 (94), Para 94.22 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1130]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.94.22  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the preferential motion submitted by Mr. OBEY that the 
Committee do now rise and report the bill back to the House with the 
recommendation that the enacting clause be stricken out.

It was decided in the

Yeas

162

negative

Nays

236
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending March 27, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: bobbe1959@bellsouth.net [mailto:bobbe1959@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:50 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Poudrier 

2127 Urbandale St. 

Shreveport, LA 71118
From: dawnstyle@hotmail.com [mailto:dawnstyle@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dawn Williams 

6016 Silkwater Court 

Raleigh, NC 27610
#### Mary E. Smith, Respondent, v. William Duffus, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Homer Anderson, Respondent, v. Joseph Powers, Appellant.

Judgment of County Court of Chenango county reversed, and the judgment of the Justices’ Court affirmed, with costs.
98-1582.

#### State ex rel. Estate of Goddard v. Dix.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1444, 700 N.E.2d 329. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-41147

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADRIAN MIGUEL GAYTAN-SILVA, 

also known a Joaquin Rendon-Carreo,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-672-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender representing Adrian Miguel

Gaytan-Silva has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Gaytan-Silva has not filed a response to the motion. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
No. 04-41147

-2-

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th CIR. R.

42.2
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.11 Petroleum gas systems. ( a ) Each plant that supplies petroleum gas by pipeline to a natural gas distribution system must meet the requirements of this part and NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7), based on the scope and applicability statements in those standards.
( b ) Each pipeline system subject to this part that transports only petroleum gas or petroleum gas/air mixtures must meet the requirements of this part and NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7), based on the scope and applicability statements in those standards.
( c ) In the event of a conflict between this part and NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7), NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 shall prevail if applicable based on the scope and applicability statements in those standards.
[Amdt. 192-135, 89 FR 33280, Apr. 29, 2024]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Rene Campos, Jimmy Arnold, Chris Robertson

Appellate case number: 01-21-00247-CV

Trial court case number: 1156293

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Relators, Rene Campos, Jimmy Arnold, and Chris Robertson, have filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in this Court, challenging the trial court’s May 10, 2021 order

allowing certain discovery.

1

 The May 10, 2021 order was signed by the Honorable 

George Barnstone. Judge Barnstone resigned from the office of judge of County Civil 

Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, effective July 19, 2021.

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2, the Honorable Audrie LawtonEvans is substituted for the Honorable George Barnstone as the respondent in this 

original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(a). Further, this original proceeding for 

petition of writ of mandamus is abated and remanded to the trial court to allow Judge 

Lawton-Evans to reconsider the ruling made the basis of relators’ petition. See TEX. R.

1 Three mandamus petitions that stem from the same trial court case have been filed. 

In one of those proceedings, No. 01-21-00250-CV, In re 2016 Baytown Rd, LLC

d/b/a Watermark at Baytown Apartments, 2015 Houston Redford, LLC d/b/a The 

Redford Apartments, 2013 Houston Maxey, LLC d/b/a Rollingwood Apartments, 

2013 Houston Fleming, LLC d/b/a Timber Ridge Apartments, 2013 Travis Oak 

Creek, LP d/b/a Lucero Apartment Homes, 2013 Travis Oak Creek GP, LLC, 

Lucero, LLC, 2015 Houston Gulfton, LLC d/b/a La Estancia Apartments, 2014 

Galveston Jones Drive, LLC d/b/a Island Bay Apartments, Eureka Multifamily 

Group GP, Inc., Eureka Multifamily Group, LP, Rene Campos, Jimmy Arnold, 

Chris Roberson, Kenneth B. Chaiken, and Chaiken & Chaiken P.C., all trial court 

proceedings and deadlines were stayed until the petition for writ of mandamus is 

decided or until further order from this Court. 
APP. P. 7.2(b) (“If the case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate 

the proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.”). The 

trial court stay is lifted for the limited purpose of allowing Judge Lawton-Evans to 

reconsider the ruling.

Within forty-five days of the date of this order, the parties are directed to notify 

the Clerk of this Court of any action taken on reconsideration of the rulings made the 

basis of relator’s petition and file any orders regarding reconsideration of those rulings in 

a supplemental mandamus record. The Court will then consider a motion to reinstate or 

motion to dismiss this proceeding, as appropriate.

This original proceeding is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from 

this Court’s active docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _________/s/ Julie Countiss____________

 Acting individually

Date: September 28, 2021
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.38 Leave of Absence]
[Pages 1102-1103]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.38  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. GRAHAM, for today until 7:30 p.m.;
  To Mr. MFUME, for today; and
  To Mr. TUCKER, for today.
  And then,

[[Page 1103]]
```
#### Charles E. Cone, *Respondent, v.*Roswell Warner, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending February 25, 2012

|Filer                                                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|WESTERN STATE AGENCY, INC., EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST | * 3A3         | Western State Agency, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Devils Lake, North Dakota, to acquire additional shares and thereby increase its ownership of Western State Agency, Inc., Devils Lake, North Dakota, from 28.81% up to 43.25%. Western State Agency, Inc. owns Western State Bank, Devils Lake, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/09/2012
|Newspaper:                                                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                                                   | 03/09/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2012 (April 1, 2012 - June 30, 2012)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The First National Bank of Sing Sing, Appellant, v. Thomas H. Chalmers and others, Respondents.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed aud nesv trial granted; costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
#### Frank Sodomka, appellee, v. Cudahy Packing Company, appellant.

Filed July 3, 1917.

No. 19224.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*James O.*Einsler, for appellant.

*William R. Patrick*and *C. J. Southard,, contra.*

Sedgwick, J. •

This action is based upon the same facts involved in *Sodomka v. Cudahy Packing Co., ante,*p. 446. That was an action by the young man who was injured by the accident. This case is by his father to recover for loss of services of his son. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

For the reasons there given, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed.

Morrissey, C. J., dissents.

Letton, J., not sitting.
BRIAN QUINN Chief Justice
PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice JUDY C. PARKER Justice
LAWRENCE M. DOSS Justice 

## Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building 501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 9540 79105-9540
(806) 342-2650 August 27, 2020 Hillary Netardus Attorney at Law P.O. Box 50652 Amarillo, TX 79159 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Russell Thorum Assistant District Attorney P.O. Box 1592 Pampa, TX 79066 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Case Number: 07-19-00257-CR, 07-19-00258-CR Trial Court Case Number: 5150, 5151 Style: Brandon Edward Standerfer v. The State of Texas Dear Counsel: The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. T EX

. R. A PP . P. 48. In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on file with this Court, if any , will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court. Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long Vivian Long, Clerk

cc: Honorable Steven R. Emmert (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Sherri Jones (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33777-33778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3044]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 07-05]


Notice of the June 27, 2007 Millennium Challenge Corporation 
Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

Time and Date: 10 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., Wednesday, June 27, 2007.

Place: Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Suzi M. Morris via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b19343a293f1b363838753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="61230e001305210c02024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 521-3600.

Status: Meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The Board of Directors (the ``Board'') of the 
Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') will hold a meeting to 
discuss and consider proposed Millennium Challenge Account (``MCA'') 
Compacts under the provisions of Section 605(a) of the Millennium 
Challenge Act, codified at 22 U.S.C. 7704(a); a Threshold Country 
Program submission for FY 2007 MCA assistance under Section 616 of the 
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (the ``Act'') codified at 22 U.S.C. 
7715; Compact and Threshold Program issues; and certain administrative 
matters.
    The agenda items are expected to involve the discussion of 
classified

[[Page 33778]]

information and the meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 15, 2007.
William G. Anderson, Jr.,
Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-3044 Filed 6-15-07; 2:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 9211-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 176.174 Transport of Class 1 (explosive) materials in shipborne barges. ( a ) Fixed magazines may be built within a shipboard barge. Freight containers may be used as magazines within a barge.
( b ) Shipborne barges may be used for the carriage of all types of Class 1 (explosive) materials. When carrying Class 1 (explosive) materials requiring special stowage, the following requirements apply: ( 1 ) Class 1 (explosive) materials in compatibility group G or H must be stowed in freight containers.
( 2 ) Class 1 (explosive) materials in compatibility group K or L must be stowed in steel magazines.
( c ) Class 1 (explosive) materials of different compatibility groups may not be stowed within the same shipborne barge unless under § 176.144(b) of this subpart they are authorized to be stowed in the same compartment.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 69 FR 76185, Dec. 20, 2004]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2055

To amend the General Educations Provisions Act expanding the exemption

for the release of student records to comply with certain State statutes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 1995

Mr. GOODLING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the General Educations Provisions Act expanding

the exemption for the release of student records to comply with certain State statutes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRIVACY RIGHTS.

4 Section 444(b)(1)(E) of the General Education Pro5 vision Act (20 U.S.C. 1232q(b)(1)(E)) is amended to read

6 as follows:

7 ‘‘(E) State and local officials or authorities to

8 whom such information is specifically—
2

HR 2055 IH

1 ‘‘(i) required to be reported or disclosed

2 pursuant to State statute adopted before No3 vember 19, 1974;

4 ‘‘(ii) allowed to be reported or disclosed

5 pursuant to State statute adopted before No6 vember 19, 1974, if the allowed reporting or

7 disclosure concerns the juvenile justice system

8 and such system’s ability to effectively serve the

9 student whose records are released; or

10 ‘‘(iii) allowed to be reported or disclosed

11 pursuant to State statute adopted after Novem12 ber 19, 1974, if—

13 ‘‘(I) the allowed reporting or disclo14 sure concerns the juvenile justice system

15 and such system’s ability to effectively

16 serve, prior to adjudication, the student

17 whose records are released; and

18 ‘‘(II) the officials and authorities to

19 whom such information is disclosed certify

20 in writing to the educational agency or in21 stitution that the information will not be

22 disclosed to any other party except as pro23 vided under State law without the prior
3

HR 2055 IH

1 written consent of the parent of the stu2 dent.’’.

Æ
#### § 1511.9 [Reserved]