alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SAVIN ROCK ARCADE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. FITZPATRICK, Former Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Connecticut, and Helen Graham, Administratrix of the Estate of James J. Graham, former Collector, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 36, Docket 25147.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 10, 1958.

Decided Oct. 27, 1958.

Arthur Klein, of Klein & Klein, New Haven, Conn. (Frederic M. Klein, of Klein & Klein, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Melvin L. Lebow, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joseph F. Goetten and Robert N. Anderson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Harry W. Hultgren, Jr., U. S. Atty., Dist. of Conn., Hartford, Conn., and W. Paul Flynn, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Anderson, D.C.Conn., 160 F.Supp. 775.
I..

**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  GENERAL **OF TEXAS** 

52norableE. A. coulaty

Attorney ‘Loun(l County srekham,

TQxaS Dam B&r: **AUSTIN** 53:

**county** tama **f9ti** a per cent of the teues, perUby and interest aotuallr-&lleotsd. &wag Other ChUga, ArtIdle 733&k, Vsrnm*e Annotated St&tutes, aontaine a proolsicnUmltlng the ooenieelon

whlbb my be paid to au& &I attorney to 16%. ktlole 733l, Reoleed CLvll Statutrr,resdr ia part aa Zolloue t *For calculatingand preperbg redarnptlo!% ocrtiiioatse

and rsoaipts,reportlag**and** crediting redamptlons,poeting Comptroller'6 redemptionr 

### 534

;:onorable

2. H. Grlffln, ?ngs 2

numbers on the delinquenttax record or annual delinquentlist, mailing csrtlflostes 0r redemp. -. flon to tucps~ersafter spProva1by ths Comptroller, **and** Sor **issuing** rsoslpts **or** oertlfi~ate,s of redemptionfor property shown on ths annual delinquentlist, the tax collsotorshall be sntitled to a is8 of one dollar ($1.00)for oaoh COrreOt A8AclSRment of land CO be cold, said f88 to be tared as oosts against the dsllnquent.Cormot asssesnsnt as herein used mssna ths Inventory of all prowrtlee owned br an individual for any one year. Provldsd,that ia no oass shall the Stats or countybe llebls for said fee. *

. . . It eeems olear to us from a reading OS Art1018 7331 that the fss of &CC required to be paid to the tax colleotor Sor eaoh oorreat aseasement of land to be sold 1s intendedto provide oompsnsatlon for osrtaln esrvlose renderedby that offiosr. It is la no sense a penalty asseseed

AgAinSt the taxpayer Sdr fa~lursto’msks time17 paymentor hls taxes. It Is our opinion that the penalty mentionedIn Artlols 7338, upon whioh a oOmmissioncan bs paid, 1s suoh a penalty as Artlole 7336, Revised Ci~ll Gtetutea,

providea. Our answer to your question 16 a negativeons. Yours very truly ATTORNEY OENERAL OF TEXAS

/)

. I By --- R ,i Ins..-

--_ - A8611 mL:LR
§ 15.11 Persons with a need to know. ( a ) *In general.* A person has a need to know SSI in each of the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When the person requires access to specific SSI to carry out transportation security activities approved, accepted, funded, recommended, or directed by DHS or DOT.
( 2 ) When the person is in training to carry out transportation security activities approved, accepted, funded, recommended, or directed by DHS or DOT.
( 3 ) When the information is necessary for the person to supervise or otherwise manage individuals carrying out transportation security activities approved, accepted, funded, recommended, or directed by the DHS or DOT.
( 4 ) When the person needs the information to provide technical or legal advice to a covered person regarding transportation security requirements of Federal law.
( 5 ) When the person needs the information to represent a covered person in connection with any judicial or administrative proceeding regarding those requirements.
( b ) *Federal employees, contractors, and grantees.* ( 1 ) A Federal employee has a need to know SSI if access to the information is necessary for performance of the employee's official duties.
( 2 ) A person acting in the performance of a contract with or grant from DHS or DOT has a need to know SSI if access to the information is necessary to performance of the contract or grant.
( c ) *Background check.* The Secretary of DOT may make an individual's access to the SSI contingent upon satisfactory completion of a security background check and the imposition of procedures and requirements for safeguarding SSI that are satisfactory to the Secretary.
( d ) *Need to know further limited by the DHS or DOT.* For some specific SSI, DHS or DOT may make a finding that only specific persons or classes of persons have a need to know.
[69 FR 28078, May 18, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 1381, Jan. 7, 2005]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approve Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project Proposals/Action, (5) General Discussion, (6) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on August 13, 2007, from 1:30 p.m. and end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. Individuals who wish to speak or propose agenda items send their names and proposals to Eduardo Olmedo, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-1815; e-mail                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and individuals who made written requests by August 10, 2007 have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: July 25, 2007.

Eduardo Olmedo,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 07-3765 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ashlle Marie Sanchez, * From the 132nd District Court

 of Scurry County,

 Trial Court No. 10264.

Vs. No. 11-16-00041-CR * October 13, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### Henry W. Smith, *Respondent, v.*Benjamin F. Trimmer, *Appellant.*

Judgment and orders affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 14, 2007, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute Clean Diesel IV has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Siemens VDO Automotive Inc., Chatham, Ontario, Canada has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Clean Diesel IV intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 6, 2004, Clean Diesel IV filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 10, 2004 (69 FR 25923).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 27, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 7, 2007 (72 FR 25782).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-3416 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Andrew I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
---------------------
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer


January 22, 2008
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 8, 2012

|Filer                          | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------ | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST PRIORITY FINANCIAL CORP. | * 3A5       | First Priority Financial Corp, Malvern, PA, to acquire 100% of Affinity Bancorp, Inc., Wyomissing, PA. | Newspaper:09/24/2012Federal Register:09/26/2012
|Newspaper:                     | 09/24/2012 
|Federal Register:              | 09/26/2012 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.25 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1057]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.25  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the preferential motion submitted by Mr. VOLKMER that the 
Committee do now rise and report the bill back to the House with the 
recommendation that the enacting clause be stricken out.

It was decided in the

Yeas

166

negative

Nays

255
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 5, 2012

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                
|--------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|Lovell Minnick Holdings LLC | CIC           | Interagency Notice of Change in Bank Control by LM III TriState Holdings LLC; LM III A TriState Holdings LLC; Lovell Minnick Equity Partners III LP; Lovell Minnick Equity Partners III A LP; Lovell Minnick Equity Advisors III LP; Fund III UGP LLC; Lovell Minnick Partners LLC; and Lovell Minnick Holdings LLC; all of Radnor, Pennsylvania, to acquire up to 24.9% of the outstanding voting shares of TriState Capital Holdings, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, and thereby indirectly control TriState Capital Bank, Pittsburgh, PA | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Rubber Trading Company, Respondent, *v.*Fisk Rubber Company, Appellant.

Reported below, 136 App. Div. 939.

(Submitted June 6, 1910;

decided June 14, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 8, 1910, affirming a judgment n favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action on contract.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that there was evidence ustaining the verdict; that the exceptions were frivolous and that no questions of law were presented for review.

*Harry D. Nims*for motion.

*W. Gr. Phlijrpeau*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 7.60 Cape Fear, NC to Sullivans Island, SC. ( a ) A line drawn from the southernmost extremity to Cape Fear to latitude 33°49.5′ N. longitude 78°03.7′ W. (Cape Fear River Entrance Lighted Bell Buoy “2CF”); thence to Oak Island Light.
( b ) A line drawn from the southernmost extremity of Bird Island at approximate position latitude 33°51.2′ N. longitude 78°32.6′ W. to latitude 33°50.3′ N. longitude 78°32.5′ W. (Little River Inlet Entrance Lighted Whistle Buoy “2LR”); thence to the northeasternmost extremity of Waties Island at approximate position latitude 33°51.2′ N. longitude 78°33.6′ W.
( c ) A line drawn from the seaward extremity of Murrells Inlet north jetty to latitude 33°31.5′ N. longitude 79°01.6′ W. (Murrells Inlet Lighted Bell Buoy “MI”); thence to Murrells Inlet South Jetty Light.
( d ) A line drawn from Georgetown Light to latitude 33°11.6′ N. longitude 79°05.4′ W. (Winyah Bay Lighted Bell Buoy “2WB”); thence to the southernmost extremity of Sand Island.
07/01/201 1 09:3 9 FAX 2024935142 FAA * OMS g|001/00 1 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOINP^ >'''••' ^^ 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMTNIS IRA ItON 

WASHINGTON, DC , . , 

In the Matter of: GOJET AIRLINES. LLC fVD GEAR PINS^ 

FAA Order No. 201 MO 

Docket No. CP10CE0003 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0025' 

Seired: June 29, 2011 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL^ 

By notice served on June 21, 2011, Complainant withdrew its appeal of ihc iniiia! 

decision served by Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin on May 20, 2011. 

THEREFORE, H IS ORDERED TIIAT: 

Complainant's appeal is dismissed. 

J. RANDOLPH BABBH r 

ADMINISTRATOR 

Federal Aviation Administration 

VICKI S. LEEMON' 

Manager, Adjudication Branch 

' Generally, materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for maierials filed in security 

ca.ses) are also available for viewing at hitp://www,r(;};vlations.gov. See 14 C.F.R. § 13.2IO(c)(i)l 

^ The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the rules of 

practice, and other information, are available 6n the Internet at the following address: 

www.faa.gov/abouL/'office_org/headciuarters_qffices/agc/pol adJudication/AGC400/ 

Civil_PenalTy. Sec 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/Wcsi publishes 

Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, ihe decisions are available through I.EXIS (TRANS library) 

and WestLaw (FTRAN-FAA database). For additional information, see the Web site. 

^ Issued under authoriiy delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assisiani Chief Counsel for 

Litigation by memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and M C.F.R. 

§ 13.202 (sec SI Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and redeicgaied by the Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
Proclamation 8162 of July 12, 2007

# Death of Lady Bird Johnson

As a mark of respect for the memory of Lady Bird Johnson, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, that on the day of her interment, the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset on such day. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.



[FR Doc. 07-3498 Billing code 3195-01-P