alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1943 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1943

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 26 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem certain 
municipal wastewater treatment facilities discharging into ocean waters 
          as the equivalent of secondary treatment facilities.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Diego Coastal Corrections Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. COASTAL DISCHARGES.

    Section 304(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1314(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Coastal discharges.--For purposes of this subsection, 
        any municipal wastewater treatment facility shall be deemed the 
        equivalent of a secondary treatment facility if each of the 
        following requirements is met:
                    ``(A) The facility employs chemically enhanced 
                primary treatment.
                    ``(B) The facility, on the date of the enactment of 
                this paragraph, discharges through an ocean outfall 
                into an open marine environment greater than 4 miles 
                offshore into a depth greater than 300 feet.
                    ``(C) The facility's discharge is in compliance 
                with all local and State water quality standards for 
                the receiving waters.
                    ``(D) The facility's discharge will be subject to 
                an ocean monitoring program acceptable to relevant 
                Federal and State regulatory agencies.''.
            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40272-40273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
in Lakeview Oregon, for the purpose of evaluating and recommending 
resource management projects for funding in 2008, under the provisions 
of Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2000 (as extended for 2008).

DATES: The meeting will be held on August 20 and 21, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Lakeview Interagency 
Office, 1301 South G Street, Lakeview, OR 97630.
    Send written comments to Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory 
Committee, c/o USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 67, Paisley OR 97636, or 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e081878f97818ea08693ce868584ce9593"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3d2d4dcc4d2ddf3d5c09dd5d6d79dc6c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Gowan, Designated Federal 
Official, c/o Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka CA 
96097, telephone (530) 841-4421.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda will include a review of the 
status of a selection of the 2002-2007 projects recommended by the RAC, 
consideration of Title II project proposals for 2008 submitted by the 
Forest Service, the public, and other agencies, presentations by 
project proponents, and final recommendations for funding of fiscal 
year 2008 projects.
    All Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee Meetings are 
open to the public. There will be a time for

[[Page 40273]]

public input and comment. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

    Dated: July 17, 2007.
Amy Gowan,
Designated Federal Official, Fremont-Winema Resource Advisory 
Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-3611 Filed 7-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-----Original Message----- 

From: ILANA@JHU.EDU [mailto:ILANA@JHU.EDU] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

ilana cember 

712 Montpelier 

Baltimore, MD 21218
-----Original Message----- 

From: stremington@earthlink.net [mailto:stremington@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

If the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici 

Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30) 

will genuinely reduce inflated costs for mental health treatment, then 

I would support it. 

Access to mental health treatment is just as vital as access to other 

types of health care, particularly in these times of high stress due to 

economic crisis and uncertainty. A strong rule to forbid insurance 

companies from charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other outof-pocket expenses for mental health treatment than they would for 

other physical health care is absolutely necessary. 

Ultimately, the best plan would be to have a single-payer system, such 

as Medicare for all, that removed obstacles stemming from for-profit 

machinations for all health services. 

Sincerely, 

Stephanie Remington 

PO Box 12383 

Costa Mesa, CA 92627
#### The People of the State of New York, *Respondent, v.*William H. Hale, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and conviction reversed and prisoner discharged. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000703645
<NAME> SPECIALTY CHEMICAL RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,874,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,703,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,199,669
<PP&E>                                      14,207,364
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,201,512)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,465,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,905,564
<BONDS>                                     10,512,660
<COMMON>                                       394,777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          350,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,163,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,465,745
<SALES>                                     28,492,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,492,848
<CGS>                                       23,460,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,460,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             791,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (874,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (874,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (874,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.243 Petitions for reconsideration. ( a ) A respondent may petition the Associate Administrator for reconsideration of an order directing amendment of plans or procedures issued under § 190.206, a final order issued under § 190.213, or a safety order issued under § 190.239. The written petition must be received no later than 20 days after receipt of the order by the respondent. A copy of the petition must be provided to the Chief Counsel of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, East Building, 2nd Floor, Mail Stop E26-105, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590 or by email to *phmsachiefcounsel@dot.gov .* Petitions received after that time will not be considered. The petition must contain a brief statement of the complaint and an explanation as to why the order should be reconsidered.
( b ) If the respondent requests the consideration of additional facts or arguments, the respondent must submit the reasons why they were not presented prior to issuance of the final order.
( c ) The filing of a petition under this section stays the payment of any civil penalty assessed. However, unless the Associate Administrator otherwise provides, the order, including any required corrective action, is not stayed.
( d ) The Associate Administrator may grant or deny, in whole or in part, any petition for reconsideration without further proceedings. If the Associate Administrator reconsiders an order under this section, a final decision on reconsideration may be issued without further proceedings, or, in the alternative, additional information, data, and comment may be requested by the Associate Administrator, as deemed appropriate.
( e ) It is the policy of the Associate Administrator to expeditiously issue notice of the action taken on a petition for reconsideration. In cases where a substantial delay is expected, notice of that fact and the date by which it is expected that action will be taken is provided to the respondent upon request and whenever practicable.
( f ) If the Associate Administrator reconsiders an order under this section, the decision on reconsideration is the final administrative action on that enforcement proceeding.
( g ) Any application for judicial review must be filed no later than 89 days after the issuance of the decision in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 60119(a).
( h ) Judicial review of agency action under 49 U.S.C. 60119(a) will apply the standards of review established in 5 U.S.C. 706.
[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58913, Sept. 25, 2013]
#### § 178.1020 Period of use for transportation of hazardous materials in Flexible Bulk Containers.

The use of Flexible Bulk Containers for the transport of hazardous materials is permitted for a period of time not to exceed two years from the date of manufacture of the Flexible Bulk Container.
#### Margaret S. Woodbridge, Appellant, v. I. Wayland Cook and others, Respondents.

Judgmentaffirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit or refund

of motor fuel excise taxes on fuel used by the motor of a highway

vehicle to operate certain power takeoff equipment on such vehicle.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1995

Mr. HERGER (for himself, Mr. HANCOCK, and Mr. CHRISTENSEN) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

credit or refund of motor fuel excise taxes on fuel used

by the motor of a highway vehicle to operate certain

power takeoff equipment on such vehicle.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF FUEL USED TO OPERATE CER4 TAIN POWER TAKEOFF EQUIPMENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 6421(e)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining off-high7 way business use) is amended by adding at the end the

8 following new subparagraph:
2

•HR 2014 IH

1 ‘‘(C) TREATMENT OF FUEL USED TO OP2 ERATE POWER TAKEOFF EQUIPMENT.—The

3 term ‘off-highway business use’ includes fuel

4 used by the motor which propels the highway

5 vehicle while such motor is operating an acces6 sory unit to power special equipment, but only

7 to the extent the taxpayer substantiates by ade8 quate records or by sufficient evidence corrobo9 rating the taxpayer’s own statement the amount

10 of fuel use allocable to the operation of such

11 equipment.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact14 ment of this Act.

Æ
From: ash1ash1@aol.com [mailto:ash1ash1@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

charles ashman 

1608 osford st 

berkeley, CA 94709
#### Frank J. Beger, *Respondent, v.*Thomas A. Pagett, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
Record of Di sc ussion Docket No. FAA- Directorat e Identifier: -AD With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i .e., Des ign Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA , ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PER S O N CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### Boeing Mr. Douglas M. 06/14/ 2014 No response. 

### Lan e A4A 

### Mr. Robert Ireland 08/1112014 No r es ponse.

Ot h er/ Additional Information:
CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIONComputation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT (12) (i) (i)and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends  2007

2006


Year Ended December 31,Earnings: ($000)

3 Months
 Ended
 Dec. 31

12 Months
 Ended
 Dec. 31

3 Months
 Ended
 Dec. 31

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002A.


Net Income


$
8,697



$
33,436


$
6,919

$
34,871

$
35,635

$
38,648

$
38,875

$
32,524B.


Federal &
 State Income Tax



5,294




20,326



3,439


21,528


23,936


28,426


26,981


21,690C.


Earnings before
 Income Taxes


$
13,991



$
53,762


$
10,358

$
56,399

$
59,571

$
67,074

$
65,856

$
54,214D.


Fixed ChargesInterest on
 Mortgage Bonds



0




0



0


0


0


0


570


2,136Interest on Other
 Long-Term Debt



5,051




18,653



4,286


16,425


13,826


11,488


10,699


9,819Other Interest



1,077




4,378



774


3,622


2,577


5,517


9,828
(1)

11,772Interest Portion of
 Rents (2)



275




898



235


818


835


954


768


749Amortization of
 Premium & Expense on Debt



243




963



256


991


1,043


1,066


1,159


1,249Total Fixed Charges


$
6,646



$
24,892


$
5,551

$
21,856

$
18,281

$
19,025

$
23,024

$
25,725E.


Total Earnings


$
20,637



$
78,654


$
15,909

$
78,255

$
77,852

$
86,099

$
88,880

$
79,939Preferred
 Dividend Requirements:F.


Allowance for
 Preferred Stock Dividends Under IRC Sec. 247


$
242



$
970


$
242

$
970

$
970

$
970

$
1,387
(1)
$
2,161G.


Less Allowable
 Dividend Deduction



(31
)



(127
)


(31
)

(127
)

(127
)

(127
)

(127
)

(127
)H.


Net Subject to
 Gross-up



211




843



211


843


843


843


1,260


2,034I.


Ratio of Earnings
 before Income Taxes to Net Income (C/A)



1.609




1.608



1.497


1.617


1.672


1.736


1.694


1.667J.


Pref. Dividend
 (Pre-tax) (H x I)



339




1,356



316


1,363


1,409


1,463


2,134


3,391K.


Plus Allowable
 Dividend Deduction



31




127



31


127


127


127


127


127L.


Preferred
 Dividend Factor



370




1,483



347


1,490


1,536


1,590


2,261


3,518M.


Fixed Charges (D)



6,646




24,892



5,551


21,856


18,281


19,025


23,024


25,725N.


Total Fixed
 Charges and Preferred Dividends


$
7,016



$
26,375


$
5,898

$
23,346

$
19,817

$
20,615

$
25,285

$
29,243O.


Ratio of Earnings
 to Fixed Charges (E/D)



3.1




3.2



2.9


3.6


4.3


4.5


3.9


3.1P.


Ratio of Earnings
 to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends (E/N)



2.9




3.0



2.7


3.4


3.9


4.2


3.5


2.7  (1)
Reflects
 SFAS No. 150 titled Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
 Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, reclassification of $208,750
 in preferred stock dividends to interest expense for the quarter ended
 September 30, 2003.(2)
The
 percentage of rent included in the fixed charges calculation is a reasonable
 approximation of the interest factor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
GROUP  INCORPORATED  ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                MAR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-30-1996
<CASH>                                    794
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          12,607
<ALLOWANCES>                              576
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       22,144
<PP&E>                                 10,696
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         71,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   9,060
<BONDS>                                 1,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   12
<OTHER-SE>                             58,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           71,893
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       58,515
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          45,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         4,719
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,379
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,379
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.02
        

</TABLE>
From: nhanson48@comcast.net [mailto:nhanson48@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Natalie Hanson 

1815 Briarwood Dr. 

Lansing, MI 48917
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.6 Communication from the Clerk--Message from the President]
[Page 1136]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.6  communication from the clerk--message from the president

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                U.S. House of Representatives,

                                    Washington, DC, July 14, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     The Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 5 of Rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed 
     envelope received from the White House on Friday, July 14, 
     1995 at 10:18 a.m. and said to contain a message from the 
     President whereby he transmits the fourth biennial report 
     (1995-2000) to the United States Arctic Research Plan.
           Sincerely yours,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
                             Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending August 31, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                      | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK RHODE ISLAND, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND | 2434113 | 04/08/2013 | 08/19/2013     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### §§ 173.117-173.119 [Reserved]
#### § 191.12 [Reserved]
MOTION DOCKET

93-2592.

#### State v. Berry.

Cuyahoga App. No. 60531. This cause is before the court for further consideration upon the filing of a motion for stay and a renewed motion for additional evaluation of appellant’s competence to forgo challenges to convictions and death sentence filed by the Ohio Public Defender.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellee may file responses to the motions no later than 12:30 p.m. today, February 18,1999.