alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: iteach@flash.net [mailto:iteach@flash.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I ask you to affirm the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I strongly support this rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Jeff Goodwin 

127 N Formosa Ave 

Los Angeles, CA 90036
[Rockingham,

December, 1880.]

#### Winslow *v.*Locke.

Assumpsit. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff delivered to the defendant goods sold by the plaintiff on the credit of one E. L., who became bankrupt. By an oral agreement between the plaintiff, the defendant, and E. L., the defendant became the plaintiff’s debtor for the goods in place of E. L. The plaintiff did not prove this claim against E. L., but proved other claims against him, and signed his composition release.

Caverly, for the plaintiff.

*Copeland f*Edgerly, for the defendant.

1. The defendant’s promise was within s. 5131 of U. S. Bev. St., which declares void any contract, made by a bankrupt or other person with a creditor, for securing the payment of any money as a consideration for or with intent to induce the creditor to forbear opposing the bankrupt’s discharge.

2. The defendant’s promise was void at common law for want of consideration, and under the statute of frauds as an oral promise to pay the debt of another. *Belknap*v. Bender, 75 N. Y. 446.

Doe, C. J.

It does not appear that the defendant’s promise was made to induce the plaintiff to forbear opposing the bankrupt’s discharge. Such a purpose is not a fact found by the referee. The original debts for the goods were due, one from the defendant to E. L., and the other from E. L. to the plaintiff. In the novation the plaintiff accepted the defendant as debtor in place of E. L., and the defendant accepted the plaintiff as creditor in place of E. L. The defendant, exchanging one creditor for another, promised to pay his own debt.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended  December  31, 2002 (the  "Report") by Xtrana,
Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1.       To the best of my  knowledge,  the Report fully  complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       To the best of my knowledge,  the information contained in the
                  Report  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


Dated:  March 28, 2003              /s/ Timothy Dahltorp
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Timothy Dahltorp, Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,070,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                    86,619
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       8,647,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,236,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      6,831,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,919,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,236,921
<SALES>                                        820,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               832,870
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  587,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,640
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             132,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
. 

AUBTIS. %-ES+83 rfi+rll, 

July 14, 1971 

Iionorable Murray Jordan 

District Attorney 

193 Judicial District 

McCulloch County Courthouse 

Brady, Texas 

Dear Mr. Jordan: 

opinion NO. M-903 

Re: Option to use jury 

commissioners under 

Senate Bill 369, 62nd 

Legislature, R.S., 1971, 

and related questions. 

You have inquired as to the applicability of the follewing provision of Senate Bill 369, 62nd Legislature, Regular 

Session, 1971 (and related questions): 

"Sec. 17. For all counties under 10,000 

popumnot presently using the jury wheel 

system for selection of jurors, the district 

judge of the county or of the judicial district 

of which the county is a part, may determine 

whether the county should come under the provisions of this law or nay choose to adopt the 

jury commissioners system for selection of 

jurors in that county. If the district judge 

should determine to adopt the jury commissioners system for selection of jurors in a particular county, he must do so by July 15, 1971, 

otherwise, the county will come under the provisions of this Act. If, pursuant to the.passage of this Act, this section is held to be 

unconstitutional by a court of this State or 

of the United States, then the jury wheel systern for selection of jurors as provided by this 

Act shall be applicable to all counties of the 

State." 

We need not reach the question of whether or not Section 

17 (supra) violates the constitutional prohibition against 

delegation of legislative powers to a member of the judiciary. 

-4397- 

,. . . 
. 

Honorable Murray Jordan, Page 2 (M-903) 

We would like to point out the fact that S.B. 369 (supra) 

specifically repeals the following numbered hrticles of the 

Revised Civil Statutes of Texasr 

1. 2104 

2. 2105 1:: 

2112 

2113 

:: 21067 11.2 21145 

5. 2108 2116 

6. 2109 1':: 2116~ 

7. 2110 

8. 2111 

15; 2116e 

which constitute all of the Articles establishing procedures 

for the use of Jury Commissioners. 

It is, therefore, the opinion of this office that Set, 

17 of Senate Bill 369, 62nd Legislature, Regular Session, 

1971, cannot become operative because all procedures for 

the use of Jury Commissioners have been repealed, and that 

all counties must comply with the Jury Wheel Law. 

SUMMARY 

Senate Bill 369, 62nd Legislature, R.S., 

1971, terminates all jury commissioner eysterns and all counties must use a jury wheel. 

Prepared by Howard M. Fender 

Assistant Attorney General 

General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMRITTBE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

-4398- 

i,. ,~ ,.. 
. . 

. 

Honorable Murray Jordan, Page 3 

Charles Parrett 

Jay Floyd 

John Reeves 

Malcolm Quick 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WiLKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLAWHITE 

First Assistant 

-4399- 

(M-903)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIION EXTRACTED FROM (STERLING
WEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,847
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              99
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,239
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,281
<LOANS>                                         68,775
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,230
<DEPOSITS>                                      92,794
<SHORT-TERM>                                       800
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                908
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,686
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,958)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 101,230
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,196
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,082
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,278
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,882
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,907
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,371
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,227
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 857
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (531)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (533)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.44
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,260
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      957
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,668
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21



BROOKSTONE, INC.



Subsidiary of Registrant



April 11, 2003



|Name                                                           |  | Organized under laws of
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Brookstone, Company, Inc.                                      |  | New Hampshire          
|Brookstone Stores, Inc.                                        |  | New Hampshire          
|Brookstone Purchasing, Inc.                                    |  | New Hampshire          
|Brookstone Properties, Inc.                                    |  | New Hampshire          
|Brookstone By Mail, Inc.                                       |  | New Hampshire          
|Brookstone Holdings, Inc.                                      |  | New Hampshire          
|Fork Distribution Corporation                                  |  | New Hampshire          
|Gardeners Eden By Mail, Inc.                                   |  | New Hampshire          
|Brookstone Retail Puerto Rico, Inc.                            |  | Puerto Rico            
|Brookstone OHare, LLC                                         |  | Delaware               
|Gardeners Eden Company, Inc.                                   |  | New Hampshire          
|Gardeners Eden Purchasing, Inc.                                |  | New Hampshire          
|National Concessions Management Brookstone Stores Georgia, LLC |  | Delaware
§ 90.05-35 Flammable and combustible liquid cargo in bulk. Note:
Requirements for double hull construction for vessels carrying oil, as defined in 33 CFR 157.03, in bulk as cargo are found in 33 CFR 157.10d.
Vessels inspected and certificated under this subchapter may carry limited quantities of flammable and combustible liquid cargo in bulk in the grades indicated, provided the Certificate of Inspection is endorsed to permit such carriage: ( a ) Cargo vessels: ( 1 ) Grades D and E in an integral tank; and
( 2 ) Grades D and E and certain specifically named Grade C in a portable tank, including a marine portable tank (MPT), in accordance with subpart 98.30 or 98.33 of this subchapter.
( b ) Miscellaneous Vessels, such as cable, salvage, pile-driving, and oil-drilling-rig vessels: ( 1 ) Grades B, C, D, and E in a fixed independent or integral tank authorized by the commandant;
( 2 ) Grades D and E and certain specifically named Grade C in a portable tank, including an MPT, in accordance with subpart 98.30 or 98.33 of this subchapter.
[CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37410, Sept. 11, 1990, as amended by CGD 90-051, 57 FR 362146, Aug. 12, 1992]
-----Original Message----- 

From: PELE46@AOL.COM [mailto:PELE46@AOL.COM] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carolyn Hawk 

3680 Algoma Road 

NEW FRANKEN, WI 54229
§ 178.608 Vibration standard. ( a ) Each packaging must be capable of withstanding, without rupture or leakage, the vibration test procedure outlined in this section.
( b ) Test method. ( 1 ) Three sample packagings, selected at random, must be filled and closed as for shipment.
( 2 ) The three samples must be placed on a vibrating platform that has a vertical or rotary double-amplitude (peak-to-peak displacement) of one inch. The packages should be constrained horizontally to prevent them from falling off the platform, but must be left free to move vertically, bounce and rotate.
( 3 ) The test must be performed for one hour at a frequency that causes the package to be raised from the vibrating platform to such a degree that a piece of material of approximately 1.6 mm (0.063 inch) thickness (such as steel strapping or paperboard) can be passed between the bottom of any package and the platform.
( 4 ) Immediately following the period of vibration, each package must be removed from the platform, turned on its side and observed for any evidence of leakage.
( 5 ) Other methods, at least equally effective, may be used, if approved by the Associate Administrator.
( c ) *Criteria for passing the test.* A packaging passes the vibration test if there is no rupture or leakage from any of the packages. No test sample should show any deterioration which could adversely affect transportation safety or any distortion liable to reduce packaging strength.
[Amdt. 178-97, 55 FR 52723, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66286, Dec. 20, 1991; 66 FR 45386, Aug. 28, 2001]
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1911

For the relief of Pauline Applewhite Saunders.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 1995

Mr. BATEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Pauline Applewhite Saunders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO ANNUITY BENEFITS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determining the

5 entitlement of Pauline Applewhite Saunders of Poquoson,

6 Virginia, to annuity benefits under subchapter II of chap7 ter 73 of title 10, United States Code, William T. Saun8 ders, the deceased husband of Pauline Applewhite Saun9 ders, is deemed—

10 (1) to have had 20 years of service as of the

11 date of the letter that erroneously informed him

12 that, according to the records of the Virginia Mili-
2

•HR 1911 IH

1 tary District, he had in excess of 20 years of service;

2 and

3 (2) to have been otherwise entitled to retired

4 pay under chapter 67 of such title.

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to an6 nuity benefits payable for any month that begins more

7 than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 SEC. 2. LUMP-SUM PAYMENT OF PAST RETIRED PAY AND

9 ANNUITY BENEFITS.

10 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of the

11 Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund, to

12 Pauline Applewhite Saunders the sum of—

13 (1) the total amount of any retired pay that

14 William T. Saunders would have received under sec15 tion 1331 of title 10, United States Code (as in ef16 fect on the 60th anniversary of his birth), during the

17 period beginning on the 60th anniversary of his

18 birth and ending on June 25, 1977 (the date of his

19 death) if he had possessed the characteristics re20 ferred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1; and

21 (2) the total amount of any annuity benefits

22 that Pauline Applewhite Saunders would have re23 ceived under subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 10,

24 United States Code, during the period beginning on

25 June 25, 1977, and ending on the last day of the
3

•HR 1911 IH

1 month preceding the 1st month to which section 1

2 applies, if William T. Saunders had possessed the

3 characteristics referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2)

4 of section 1.

5 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

6 It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per7 cent of the payment required by section 2 to be paid to

8 or received by any agent or attorney for any service ren9 dered in connection with the payment. Any person who

10 violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and

11 shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title

12 18, United States Code.

Æ
Reference Copy 

GRIC Tribal Implementation Plan 

(TIP) 

For Management of Air Quality 

Additional Copies are available at the 

GRIC Department of Environmental 

Quality Office (DEQ) or by calling 

(520) 562-2234 or 

e-mail: air@gilanet.net
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 
 English Summary of the Memorandum of Understanding (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 1, 2011, by and between Asifey Bar (AGSH) (the “Service Provider”) and Evogene
Ltd. (the “Company”), as amended by Amendments dated June 14, 2012 and October 27, 2012. 
  

	 	•	 	 Subject Matter of Agreement: Provision of land and services by the Service Provider to the Company for purposes of growing plants for the
Company’s scientific and agricultural experiments. 


  

	 	•	 	 Premises Covered by Agreement: 120 dunams (120,000 square meters or 1,291,670 square feet) of land and an additional 70 square meter (or
approximately 750 square feet) structure located in Kibbutz Beit Guvrin, Israel (the “Original Premises”). 


 Under the October 27, 2012 amendment to the Agreement, effective as of November 15, 2012, the Company returned the Original Premises to the Service Provider on an interim basis, in exchange for
an alternative lot of 170 dunams (170,000 square meters or approximately 1,829,864 square feet) size (the “Alternative Premises”) made available by the Service Provider for use under the Agreement. This exchange will end on
September 1, 2013, on which date the Company will receive back the Original Premises for use under the Agreement and will return the Alternative Premises to the Services Provider (the interim period from November 15, 2012 until
September 1, 2013 is referred to herein as the “Intermediate Period”). 
  

	 	•	 	 Services Covered by Agreement: The Service Provider performs the following services—processing, sowing, irrigation, spraying and
harvesting—in accordance with instructions from the Company. 


  

	 	•	 	 Term of Agreement: 48 months, from June 1, 2011 until June 1, 2015. The Company may, at its discretion, extend the term of the
Agreement for an additional period of between 3 years and 5 years from the date of termination of the initial 48 month term. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fees Due from the Company: 


 The following categories of fees are owed by the Company to the Service Provider under the Agreement: 
 —Management fees equal to NIS 24,000, plus VAT per year for the structure; NIS 120,000, plus VAT, per year for the Original Premises (the required payment of which is suspended during the
Intermediate Period), and NIS 170,000, plus VAT, per year for the Alternative Premises (the applicable portion of which is due for the Intermediate Period, which lasts less than one year). 

—Service fees for services performed by the Services Provider, at the set rate paid to workers in the Israeli union of cultivation
workers. 
 —Water fees, at the same rate charged to the Service Provider by the Israeli water company, Mekorot.

  

	 	•	 	 Termination: The Company may terminate the Agreement at any time throughout the term upon 120 days prior written notice.