alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.16 After Recess--3:30 P.M.]
[Page 891]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.16  after recess--3:30 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. TALENT, called the House to order.
```
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MICHAEL F. ANTHONYMichael F. Anthony Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer Director




Dated: May 2, 2003
IB

House Calendar No. 155

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061

[Report No. 104–412]

To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker

City, Oregon, as the ‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1995

Mr. COOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey

Avenue, Baker City, Oregon, as the ‘‘David J. Wheeler

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue,

5 Baker City, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the

6 ‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 2061 RH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.

House Calendar No. 155

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061

[Report No. 104–412]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 1550

D

‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.Dewey Avenue, Baker City, Oregon, as the

ECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
§ 179.22 Marking. In addition to any other marking requirement in this subchapter, the following marking requirements apply: ( a ) Each tank car must be marked according to the requirements in appendix C of the AAR Specifications for Tank Cars (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( b ) Each tank car that requires a tank-head puncture-resistance system must have the letter “S” substituted for the letter “A” in the specification marking.
( c ) Each tank car that requires a tank-head puncture-resistance system, a thermal protection system, and a metal jacket must have the letter “J” substituted for the letter “A” or “S” in the specification marking.
( d ) Each tank car that requires a tank-head puncture-resistance system, a thermal protection system, and no metal jacket must have the letter “T” substituted for the letter “A” or “S” in the specification marking.
( e ) Each tank car manufactured after March 16, 2009, and before December 28, 2020, to meet the requirements of §§ 173.244(a)(2) or (3) or 173.314(c) or (d) that is marked with the letter “I” in the specification marking, following the test pressure, shall be re-marked with the letter “W” with a delimeter of letter “H” at the tank car's next qualification. (Example: DOT 105J600I would be re-marked as 105H600W.) Each new tank car manufactured after December 28, 2020 shall be marked with the letter “W” following the test pressure and with a delimiter of “H”. (Example: 105H600W).
[Amdt. 179-50, 60 FR 49077, Sept. 21, 1995, as amended by Amdt. 179-50, 61 FR 33256, June 26, 1996; 68 FR 75759, Dec. 31, 2003; 74 FR 1802, Jan. 13, 2009; 85 FR 75716, Nov. 25, 2020]
#### * WILLIAM W. RAMSEY, as Overseer of the Poor of the TOWN OF LUZERNE, Respondent, *v.*DAVID CHILDS, Appellant.

*Undertaking on an appeal in bastardy proceedings*— form *of*it— *Code of Gnminal Procedure, see.*851 — *the Gov/rt of Sessions cannot allow it to he amended, when defective.*

Appeal from an order made at a Court of Sessions of Warren county, dismissing an appeal on account of defects contained in the undertaking given by the appellant, and denying a motion for leave to amend the same. The defendant appealed from an order of filiation, made by two magistrates of the town of Luzerne, adjudging him to be the father of a child likely to be born. The undertaking, which was approved by the justices, was conditioned that “ the said David Childs shall appear at the next Court of Sessions, to be held in and for the county of Warren, on the 26th day of May, 1884, and not depart the said county without its leave.”

A motion was made by the respondent, at the Court of Sessions of Warren county, to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the undertaking was defective, in that it did not comply with the provisions of section 851 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The-motion was granted. The order contained the following sentence: *“*The defendant offers to amend said undertaking, or execute a new one in conformity with the statute, which is denied by the court upon the ground that they have no power or jurisdiction to grant the same.”

The court at General Term said : *“*The undertaking to be given under subdivision 2, section 851, Code of Criminal Procedure, is to be conditioned to appear at the next court, etc., ‘ to answer the charge and obey its order thereon.’ The sureties are to be approved by *330the magistrates. In this case the condition was to appear ‘and not depart the *county*without its leave.’ ‘ County ’ is probably a clerical error for *‘*court.’ But the condition is quite different from that required by the section, in its meaning and effect. The sureties would not be bound for the defendant’s obedience to the order of the court, but only for his attendance there.

“ The only question then is as to the power of the Court of Sessions to permit an amendment or a new undertaking. We are referred to no provision of the statute which is applicable. The defendant cites sections 129, 730, Code Civil Procedure. But it is at least doubtful whether they apply to the present case. And as the undertaking now in question is to be approved' by the magistrates, we see no authority for the accepting a new undertaking by -the Court of Sessions.

“Another objection may be stated. The offer to amend the undertaking was made by the defendant. No offer was made by the surety to consent to such amendment.' Clearly the undertaking would not be amended except by the consent of the surety.” (Code Civ. Pro., § 730.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

*J. H. Bam,*for the appellant.

*H. P. Gwinvyo,*for the respondent.

*

 Decided, September Term, 1884.

Opinion by

LeaeNed, P.' J.

Present — LeaeNed, P. J., Booses and LaNdou, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 135 (Monday, July 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 38844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


30-Day Notice of Submission of Study Package to the Office of 
Management and Budget; Opportunity for Public Comment (OMB <greek-i> 
1024-0236)

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 
U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D)] and 5 CFR part 1320, Reporting and Record Keeping 
Requirements, the National Park Service (NPS) invites public comments 
on a revision of a currently approved collection of information (OMB 
<greek-i> 1024-0236). The 30-Day Federal Register Notice for this 
collection of information that was published on June 26, 2007 (Volume 
72, Number 122, Pages 35065-35066), was published in error and should 
be recognized as an incorrect version. The correct publication of the 
30-Day Federal Register Notice for this collection of information was 
published on June 25, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 121, Pages 34722-34723), 
and should be recognized as the correct version. If you have any 
questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Leonard 
E. Stowe, NPS, Information Collection Clearance Officer, 1849 C St., 
NW. (2605), Washington, DC 20240; or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c707973727d6e78436f68736b795c726c6f327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="610d040e0f0013053e12150e1604210f11124f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 9, 2007.
Leonard E. Stowe,
NPS, Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3448 Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 3, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE 53 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 3, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-03-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  209,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,638
<INVENTORY>                                     78,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,147
<PP&E>                                       1,387,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                 501,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,651,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,457
<BONDS>                                        385,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           798
<OTHER-SE>                                     590,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,651,925
<SALES>                                      3,522,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,522,929
<CGS>                                        1,672,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,672,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,632
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,388
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.10 Great Western Scenic Trail Designation]
[Page 376]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.10  great western scenic trail designation

  Mr. HANSEN moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 531) to 
designate the Great Western Scenic Trail and as a study trail under the 
National Trails System Act, and for other purposes; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. HANSEN and Mr. 
RICHARDSON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. RICHARDSON demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, 
which demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the 
yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: lordluvaduki@comcast.net [mailto:lordluvaduki@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sheryl Short 

2456 Gruenwald 

Blue Island, IL 60406
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ERIC KASHKASHIAN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 3 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
D.4. California-Oregon Border 

for 2006

 

1 

IMPROVE Monitoring 

for 2006-2010 (Fine Mass) 

2006

Data 
 

2 

2007
 

3 

2008
 

4 

2009
5 

2010
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1995

Received; read the first time

NOVEMBER 3, 1995

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

NOVEMBER 8, 1995

Committed to the Committee on the Judiciary for a period not to exceed 19

calendar days in which to report or be discharged

AN ACT

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partial-Birth Abortion

5 Ban Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTIONS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended by inserting after chapter 73 the following:

9 ‘‘CHAPTER 74—PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTIONS

‘‘Sec.

‘‘1531. Partial-birth abortions prohibited.
2

HR 1833 RIS

1 ‘‘§ 1531. Partial-birth abortions prohibited

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign

3 commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion

4 and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this

5 title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

6 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘partial-birth

7 abortion’ means an abortion in which the person perform8 ing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus

9 before killing the fetus and completing the delivery.

10 ‘‘(c)(1) The father, and if the mother has not at11 tained the age of 18 years at the time of the abortion,

12 the maternal grandparents of the fetus, may in a civil ac13 tion obtain appropriate relief, unless the pregnancy re14 sulted from the plaintiff’s criminal conduct or the plaintiff

15 consented to the abortion.

16 ‘‘(2) Such relief shall include—

17 ‘‘(A) money damages for all injuries, psycho18 logical and physical, occasioned by the violation of

19 this section; and

20 ‘‘(B) statutory damages equal to three times

21 the cost of the partial-birth abortion.

22 ‘‘(d) A woman upon whom a partial-birth abortion

23 is performed may not be prosecuted under this section,

24 for a conspiracy to violate this section, or for an offense

25 under section 2, 3, or 4 of this title based on a violation

26 of this section.
3

HR 1833 RIS

1 ‘‘(e) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution or

2 a civil action under this section, which must be proved by

3 a preponderance of the evidence, that the partial-birth

4 abortion was performed by a physician who reasonably be5 lieved—

6 ‘‘(1) the partial-birth abortion was necessary to

7 save the life of the mother; and

8 ‘‘(2) no other procedure would suffice for that

9 purpose.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

11 for part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

12 inserting after the item relating to chapter 73 the follow13 ing new item:

‘‘74. Partial-birth abortions ........................................................... 1531’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 1,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Order entered October 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00682-CV

RUBEN MONREAL, Appellant

V.

BRUCE ALAN DOTSY D/B/A DOTSY TRUCKING SERVICE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02331-D

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 3, 2014 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellant shall file his brief by NOVEMBER 3, 2014. We caution appellant that no 

further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.14 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 634]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.14  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 28: Mr. McCollum and Mr. Traficant.
       H.R. 38: Mr. Tucker, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Matsui, 
     Mr. Stearns, Mr. Scarborough, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Bliley, Ms. 
     Woolsey, Mr. Wamp, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Leach, Mr. 
     McInnis, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Dunn of Washington, Mr. Emerson, Mr. 
     Ensign, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Heineman, Mr. Young of 
     Alaska, Mr. Bryant of Texas, Mr. Brewster, Mr. Camp, Mr. 
     Bishop, Mr. Condit, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. 
     Young of Florida, Mr. Peterson of Florida, and Mr. Bonilla.
       H.R. 315: Mr. Gutierrez.
       H.R. 359: Ms. Roybal-Allard and Mr. Smith of Texas.
       H.R. 438: Mr. Cooley.
       H.R. 553: Mr. Wynn.
       H.R. 713: Mr. Hefner, Mr. Holden, Mr. Luther, Ms. Norton, 
     Mr. Stupak, and Mr. Torkildsen.
       H.R. 752: Mr. Hayes, Mr. Mascara, Mr. Burr, Mr. Chapman, 
     Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Funderburk, and Mr. Houghton.
       H.R. 783: Mr. Ward, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, and Mr. 
     Chambliss.
       H.R. 820: Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Clinger, Mr. Hefner, Mr. 
     Coble, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Clement, Mr. Hoekstra, 
     Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Petri, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Parker, 
     Mr. Jones, Mr. Holden, and Mr. Latham.
       H.R. 893: Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Berman, Mr. Borski, and Mr. 
     Frost.
       H.R. 985: Mr. McCrery.
       H.R. 997: Mr. Bevill, Mr. Canady, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Deutsch, 
     Mr. Everett, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Horn, Mr. Martinez, 
     Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Smith of New 
     Jersey, and Mr. DeFazio.
       H.R. 1018: Mr. Shays.
       H.R. 1023: Mr. LaFalce.
       H.R. 1085: Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 1242: Mr. Bryant of Tennessee and Mrs. Myrick.
       H.R. 1252: Mr. Fattah and Mr. Smith of New Jersey.
       H.R. 1272: Mrs. Clayton.
       H.R. 1329: Ms. Lowey, Mr. Clyburn, and Mr. Lipinski.
       H.R. 1330: Mr. Pickett, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Smith of Texas, 
     Mr. McCrery, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Condit, Mr. 
     Tanner, Mr. Cremeans, Mr. Scarborough, and Mr. Radanovich.
       H.R. 1400: Mr. Conyers and Mr. Lewis of Georgia.
       H.R. 1422: Mr. Gutierrez.
       H.R. 1504: Mr. Ewing, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
     Rahall, and Mr. Martinez.
       H.R. 1512: Mr. Hancock.
       H.J. Res. 79: Mr. Chapman, Mr. Condit, Mr. Gekas, Mr. Smith 
     of Texas, and Mr. Mollohan.
       H.J. Res. 84: Mr. Owens, Mr. Rangel, and Ms. Norton.
```
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-26739, 333-58302, 333-68732 and 333-86980 and 333-113740) on Form
S-8 of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2004, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheet of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. as of December 31,
2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and related
financial statement schedule, which reports appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K/A of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. filed September 13,
2004.

(signed) KPMG LLP


Portland, Oregon
September 9, 2004