alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered May 27, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00203-CR

JOAN NOIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-58111-L

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal.

On April 29, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief had not been filed. On May 26, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, together with an 

extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 29, 

2015 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the extension motion and order appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this 

order.

We note that the trial court’s certification states both that the case involves a plea bargain 

and that appellant waived the right to appeal. The record reflects that appellant pleaded not 

guilty to the charge and was found guilty by a jury. The record also reflects that the jury 
assessed punishment. Therefore, the statements in the certification do not appear to be supported 

by the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005). 

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file, within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, an amended certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects 

the trial court proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Carter Thompson, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 5, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.333 Processing of petition. ( a ) *General.* Unless the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel otherwise specifies, no public hearing, argument, or other proceeding is held directly on a petition before its disposition under this section.
( b ) *Grants.* If the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel determines that the petition contains adequate justification, he or she initiates rulemaking action under this subpart.
( c ) *Denials.* If the Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel determines that the petition does not justify rulemaking, the petition is denied.
( d ) *Notification.* The Associate Administrator or the Chief Counsel will notify a petitioner, in writing, of the decision to grant or deny a petition for rulemaking.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 10 98

MADHU VERMA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
DANIEL A. STAEVEN , Defendant

- Appellee , and
REBECCA ANNE HERR , Trustee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:22

- cv - 01130

- DKC )

Submitted : November 21, 2023 Decided: November 27, 2023

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Madhu Verma, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1098 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Madhu Verma appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Daniel A. Staeven’s motion for entry of judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Verma v. Staeven , No. 8 : 22

- c v - 0 1130

- DKC (D. Md. Dec. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1098 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 154 (Friday, August 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 45064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-100 5882 RD 50; HAG 07-0155]


Roseburg District Resource Advisory Committee: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the following 
advisory committee meeting:
    Name: Roseburg District Resource Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: 9 a.m. August 20, 2007; 9 a.m. September 17, 2007; 9 
a.m. September 24, 2007.
    Place: Roseburg District Office, 777 NW., Garden Valley Blvd., 
Roseburg, Oregon 97470.
    Status: Open to the public; a public comment period will be 
provided.
    Matters to be Considered: The Resource Advisory Committee will 
consider proposed projects for Title II funding that focus on 
maintaining or restoring water quality, land health, forest ecosystems, 
and infrastructure.
    Contact Person for More Information: Program information, meeting 
records and a roster of Committee members may be obtained from Jake 
Winn, Restoration Coordinator, 777 NW., Garden Valley Blvd., Roseburg, 
Oregon 97470; (541) 464-3275.
    Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the BLM 
Roseburg District at (440) 440-4940 as soon as possible.

Jay Carlson,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 07-3905 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.15 Rules of regulatory construction. ( a ) As used in this part: *Includes* means including but not limited to.
*May* means “is permitted to” or “is authorized to”.
*May not* means “is not permitted to” or “is not authorized to”.
*Shall* is used in the mandatory and imperative sense.
( b ) In this part: ( 1 ) Words importing the singular include the plural;
( 2 ) Words importing the plural include the singular; and
( 3 ) Words importing the masculine gender include the feminine.
#### Will Irby v. The State.

*No. 737.*

*Decided March 27.*

Statement of Facts—Order for Filing After Adjournment—Practice on Appeal.—The making of an order to file the statement of facts, at any time within ten days after adjournment of the term, under provisions of article 1379, Revised Statutes, is within the sound discretion of the trial judge; and unless it is made to appear that this discretion has been abused, a refusal by the court to make such order will not be revised on appeal.

Appeal from the County Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. Robert G. Johnson, County Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted by information, and convicted for an aggravated assault upon one George Meaehum, by cutting and stabbing him with a knife, a deadly weapon, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

Ho statement is necessary.

Ho briefs for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

HENDERSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for aggravated assault. There is no statement of facts in the case. The only bill of exceptions in the record shows, that appellant filed a motion on the lást day of the term, asking that ten days be allowed him after the adjournment of the court within which to file a statement of facts. *284This motion was overruled by the court, and defendant excepted. The court qualifies the bill by showing that the case was tried October 4, 1894, and said motion was filed ¡November 4, 1894. Article 1379, Revised Statutes, provides, that “the court may, by an order entered upon the record during the term, authorize the statement of facts to be made up and signed and filed in.vacation, at any time not exceeding ten days after the adjournment of the term.” The making of such order is within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and unless such discretion appears to have been abused, this court will not revise the action of the trial judge in refusing to make such order. In this case it does not appear that there was an abuse of such discretion in the refusal of the judge to grant the ten-day order.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 302 OF**

 

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven E. Brown, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Royal BodyCare, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 29, 2005

/s/ Steven E. Brown

Steven E. Brown

Vice President-Finance

and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 32949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14226]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9929-04-OA]

National Environmental Education Advisory Council

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, EPA gives notice of 
a series of teleconference meetings of the National Environmental 
Education Advisory Council (NEEAC). The NEEAC was created by Congress 
to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on matters related to 
activities, functions and policies of EPA under the National 
Environmental Education Act (the Act). 20 U.S.C. 5508(b).
    The purpose of this teleconference(s) is to discuss specific topics 
of relevance for consideration by the council in order to provide 
advice and insights to the Agency on environmental education.

DATES: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will hold 
a public teleconference on Thursday, June 18th, 2015, from 1:00 p.m. 
until 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Araujo, Designated Federal 
Officer, araujo.javier@epa.gov, 202-564-2642, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Environmental Education, William Jefferson Clinton North Room, 1426, 
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public wishing to gain access 
to the teleconference, make brief oral comments, or provide a written 
statement to the NEEAC must contact Javier Araujo, Designated Federal 
Officer, at araujo.javier@epa.gov or 202-564-2642 by 10 business days 
prior to each regularly scheduled meeting.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities or to request accommodations, please 
contact Javier Araujo at araujo.javier@epa.gov or 202-564-2642, 
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much 
time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: June 2, 2015.
Sarah Sowell,
Deputy Director, Office of Environmental Education.
    Dated: June 2, 2015.
Javier Araujo,
(NEEAC) Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-14226 Filed 6-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.621 Maximum allowable operating pressure: High-pressure distribution systems. ( a ) No person may operate a segment of a high pressure distribution system at a pressure that exceeds the lowest of the following pressures, as applicable: ( 1 ) The design pressure of the weakest element in the segment, determined in accordance with subparts C and D of this part.
( 2 ) 60 p.s.i. (414 kPa) gage, for a segment of a distribution system otherwise designed to operate at over 60 p.s.i. (414 kPa) gage, unless the service lines in the segment are equipped with service regulators or other pressure limiting devices in series that meet the requirements of § 192.197(c).
( 3 ) 25 p.s.i. (172 kPa) gage in segments of cast iron pipe in which there are unreinforced bell and spigot joints.
( 4 ) The pressure limits to which a joint could be subjected without the possibility of its parting.
( 5 ) The pressure determined by the operator to be the maximum safe pressure after considering the history of the segment, particularly known corrosion and the actual operating pressures.
( b ) No person may operate a segment of pipeline to which paragraph (a)(5) of this section applies, unless overpressure protective devices are installed on the segment in a manner that will prevent the maximum allowable operating pressure from being exceeded, in accordance with § 192.195.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998]
From: eslack@simpletruthpublishing.net 

[mailto:eslack@simpletruthpublishing.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

edward slack 

2311 selma dr 

nashville, TN 37214
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.720 Distribution systems: Leak repair.

Mechanical leak repair clamps installed after January 22, 2019 may not be used as a permanent repair method for plastic pipe.

[Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58719, Nov. 20, 2018]
###### Editorial Note on Part 171

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 171 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 171.11 [Reserved]
Exhibit 24


   POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN  BY THESE PRESENTS,  that Integra  Financial Corporation
   and each  person whose  signature appears  below constitutes  and  appoints
   Charles R. Skillington and Robert H. Stevenson, jointly and severally,  his
   or her  attorneys-in-fact, each with power of substitution, for  him or her
   in any and all capacities, to sign an Annual Report pursuant  to Section 13
   or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K for the fiscal
   year ended December 31, 1995, and any  amendments thereto, and to file  the
   same, with exhibits  thereto, and other documents in  connection therewith,
   with  the   Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,   hereby  ratifying  and
   confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitutes, may
   do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

   SIGNATURES                                      TITLE

        INTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION              Registrant

   By:   /s/ William F. Roemer         
         William F. Roemer
         Chairman of the Board and 
         Chief Executive Officer



   /s/ William F. Roemer                             Chairman of the Board and
   William F. Roemer                   Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)



   /s/ Gary E. Wolbert                                Executive Vice President
   and
   Gary E. Wolbert                     Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial and
                                       Accounting Officer)


   /s/ James S. Beckwith, III                        Director
   James S. Beckwith, III


   /s/ James S. Broadhurst                           Director
   James S. Broadhurst


   /s/ Leonard M. Carroll                            Director
   Leonard M. Carroll


   /s/ Carl D. Doverspike                            Director
   Carl D. Doverspike<PAGE>



   /s/ James E. Feeney                               Director
   James E. Feeney


   /s/ William A. Freeman                            Director
   William A. Freeman


   /s/ Walter J. Greenleaf, Jr.                      Director
   Walter J. Greenleaf, Jr.


   /s/ Stanley R. Gumberg                            Director
   Stanley R. Gumberg


   /s/ John G. Koedel, Jr.                           Director
   John G. Koedel, Jr.


   /s/ Robert F. Patton                              Director
   Robert F. Patton


   /s/ Robert A. Paul                                Director
   Robert A. Paul


   /s/ Michael A. Schuler                            Director
   Michael A. Schuler


   /s/ Henry B. Suhr, Jr.                            Director
   Henry B. Suhr, Jr.


   /s/ Robert K. Wagner                              Director
   Robert K. Wagner


   /s/ Phillips Wiegand                              Director
   Phillips Wiegand


   /s/ Margot B. Woodwell                            Director
   Margot B. Woodwell




   Dated:  January 24, 1996<PAGE>
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
 
 I, J. Peter Gyben, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of USA Biomass Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May 5, 2004
 
 /s/ J. Peter Gyben  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer