alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

APR-~ 2016 

Maureen Sullivan 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Environment, Safety and Occupational Health) 

3400 Defense Pentagon 

Washington DC 20301-3400 

Dear Ms. Sullivan: 

OFFICE OF 

LAND AND EMERGENCY 

MANAGEMENT 

Thank you for your letter, dated March 21,2016, requesting an extension of the 60-day 

comment period for the proposed rulemaking to add a subsurface intrusion component to the 

Hazard Ranking System. EPA published this proposed action in the Federal Register on 

February 29, 2016. You requested a 60-day extension of the comment period to allow adequate 

time for Department of Defense (DoD) to respond to the lengthy and complex proposed rule. 

EPA is denying your request to extend the public comment period. We understand and 

appreciate your concerns and sincerely value DoD's input on the proposed rulemaking. DoD had 

many opportunities to raise concerns during the six-month interagency review period prior to the 

proposed rule's publication. The interagency review concluded on December 21 , 2015, at which 

time EPA provided a red line/strikeout version of the proposed rule incorporating revisions based 

on DoD's concerns (see document number EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-1086-0067 in 

http://www.regulations.gov). While we acknowledge that the proposed rule raises technical 

issues that require consideration, we believe that the six-month interagency review period, the 

additional two-month period prior to publication plus the 60-day comment period all provide 

ample time for DoD to review the information and prepare comments. 

EPA can guarantee consideration only ofthose comments postmarked by the close of the 

comment period on April29, 2016. We will carefully consider all comments submitted during 

the comment period before we make a final decision regarding the addition of a subsurface 

intrusion component to the Hazard Ranking System. 

Sincerely, 

~s!U(d James E. Woolford 

Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology 

Innovation
<PAGE>
                          COOPERS & LYBRAND LETTERHEAD
 

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  consent to the  incorporation by reference in  the registration statement of
Noel Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-55296) of our report dated December 2,
1994, on our audit of the  financial statements of HealthPlan Services  Division
(formerly  Plan  Services  Division,  a  wholly-owned  division  of  The  Dun  &
Bradstreet Corporation), as of September 30, 1994, and for the nine-month period
then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Tampa, Florida
April 10, 1997



<PAGE>
Motion Granted , Appeal Dismisse d, and Memorandum Opinion filed January

13 , 202 2
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 1

- 00 464

- CV
ELITE POWER, LLC AND BRANDON MICHAEL MARTIN , Appellant s
V. MOTH MANAGEMENT, INC. AND EADO INVESTMENTS, L.P. , Appellee s
On Appeal from the 1 90 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 86771

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a final judgment signed May 17 , 2021

. On January 5, 2022 , the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal “with prejudice

. ” The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure speak only of a dismissal of an appeal; neither “with prejudice” nor “without prejudice” is appended to the word “dismissal”. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We construe the motion as one for voluntary dismissal under2

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). So construed, t he motion is granted , and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.33 Recess--11:31 P.M.]
[Page 1123]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.33  recess--11:31 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LONGLEY, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 11 o'clock and 31 minutes p.m., subject 
to the call of the Chair.

          THURSDAY, JULY 13 (LEGISLATIVE DAY OF JULY 12), 1995
```
Order entered November 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00948-CV

JULIA BELLE DIXON, Appellant

V.

CITY CREDIT UNION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03383-D

ORDER

We DENY appellee’s motion to dismiss.

The reporter’s record is past due and the court reporter has informed the Court that she 

had not received a request to prepare the reporter’s record. In a letter dated October 13, 2015,

the Court instructed appellant to file, within ten days, notice that she has requested preparation of 

the reporter’s record and written verification that she has paid the reporter’s fee, made 

arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee, or has been found to be entitled to proceed without 

payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if the Court did not receive the required 

documentation within the time specified, we may order the appeal submitted without the 

reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).
As of today’s date, appellant has not filed a response. Accordingly, we ORDER the 

appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant’s brief is 

due WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,559,851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,559,851
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,559,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,511,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,623,851
<SALES>                                        753,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,010,443
<CGS>                                           56,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               353,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,600,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,600,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,600,377
<EPS-BASIC>                                     164.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   164.77


</TABLE>
----

|   | 1. | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas      & Electric Corporation (the “Companies”) for the period ended December      31, 2009 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.      78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Companies. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Steven V. Lant                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Steven      V. Lant                                    |
|   | Chairman      of the Board, President and              |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer of CH Energy Group, Inc.  |
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   | /s/      Steven V. Lant                                |
|   | Steven      V. Lant                                    |
|   | Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | of      Central Hudson Gas & ElectricCorporation   |

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending February 1, 2014

|Filer                                                        | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE | * 3A3       | The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and two thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York. | Newspaper:02/06/2014Federal Register:02/10/2014
|Newspaper:                                                   | 02/06/2014 
|Federal Register:                                            | 02/10/2014 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT (23)




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement, on Form S-3 (Registration No.
333-11521-99), relating to CH Energy Group, Inc.'s Stock Purchase Plan, and (ii)
Part II of the Registration Statement, on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-46528),
relating to CH Energy Group, Inc.'s Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan,
of our report dated January 25, 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reported dated January 25, 2002 relating to the financial
statement schedule that appears in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
New York, New York
January 25, 2002
From: davenepo@yahoo.com [mailto:davenepo@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Nepomuceno 

4896 Alberson Court 

San Diego, CA 92130
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                          488000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4945000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    448000
<INVENTORY>                                    6192000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11936000
<PP&E>                                        20755000
<DEPRECIATION>                                15473000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                17276000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         17276000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        366000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4572000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17276000
<SALES>                                       24165000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              24165000
<CGS>                                         20549000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 20549000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3399000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                315000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              973000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (160000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (756000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 596000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (160000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
#### Frances L. Haight, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County, Respondent. Mary J. Parker and James McKain as Administrators, etc., of Hiram Parker, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Same. Margaret M. Powell, Administratrix, etc., of Frederick T. Powell, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Same. William V. Clarke, Appellant, v. The Same. The First National Bank of Ballston Spa, Appellant, v. The Same.

Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs on opinion of court below. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
#### RICHARD B. SMITH, Respondent, *v.*GEORGE W. COOPER, Sheriff, etc., Appellant.

*Costs*— right *of a public*officer, *in whose favor a judgment is entered, to increased costs*— *Code of Civil Procedure, seas.*3229, 3258.

Where, in an action brought against a sheriff to! recover a sum of money or a chattel, by reason of some act done by him by virtue of his' office, a final judgment is rendered in his favor, he has an absolute right to the additional costs given by section 3258 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He has the same right to the increased costs as to the single costs given by section 3229.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term denying the defendant’s motion for “ increased costs; ” the defendant having before moved for and obtained an additional allowance of $300.

The' action was brought to recover of the defendant certain chattels seized and levied upon by him, as sheriff of Suffolk county, under an execution issued to him as such sheriff against the property of one Caleb T. Smith. The jury had rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff claimed, among other things, that if defendant was legally entitled to “increased costs” under section 3258 of the Code, he should have asked for a certificate under section 3248; that the denial of this motion did not prevent his asking for the certificate, and that the order asked for if granted would have been a nullity.

*James H. Stanbrough,*for the appellant.

*J. La/virence Smith,*for the respondent.

*396Barnard, P. J.:

Tbe defendant’s right to increased costs is absolute. The Code of Civil Procedure (§ 3258) provides that a defendant in whose favor a final judgment is rendered in an action for a money recovery or for a chattel, “is entitled to recover” the increased costs when the action is brought against a public officer for an act done by him by virtue of his office. The defendant has the same right to increased costs as to single costs. (Sec. 3229.) The form of the application to the court for the increased costs, is immaterial. The papers say that a motion was made for the costs and denied. The Code requires 'a certificate. (Sec. 3248.) The court denied a right to the increased costs, and this .determination should be reversed, with costs and disbursements.

D teman, J., concurred; Pratt, J., not sitting.

Order refusing increased costs reversed, with costs and disbursements.
From: flucies@gmail.com [mailto:flucies@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Frederick Lucies 

8958 Northcove Drive 

Park City, UT 84098
§ 1546.207 Screening of individuals and property. ( a ) *Applicability of this section.* This section applies to the inspection of individuals, accessible property, checked baggage, and cargo as required under this part.
( b ) *Locations within the United States at which TSA conducts screening.* As required in its security program, each foreign air carrier must ensure that all individuals or property have been inspected by TSA before boarding or loading on its aircraft. This paragraph applies when TSA is conducting screening using TSA employees or when using companies under contract with TSA.
( c ) *Foreign air carrier conducting screening.* Each foreign air carrier must use the measures in its security program to inspect the individual or property. This paragraph does not apply at locations identified in paragraphs (b) of this section.
Exhibit 10.5

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
 1999 INCENTIVE PLAN OF
 U.S. CONCRETE, INC.

Effective as of February 13, 2006

                    The Board of Directors of U.S. Concrete, Inc. (the “Company”) by resolution has duly adopted this Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s 1999 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.

                    1.          The second sentence of Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                    “In no event will more than 500,000 shares available for Awards pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence be available for Director Awards.”

                    2.          The third sentence of Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                    
“The Committee may provide for procedures to permit the exercise or purchase of any Employee Award, Independent Contractor Award or Director Award by use of the proceeds to be received from the sale of Common Stock issuable pursuant to such an Award.”
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending August 17, 2013

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF HAWAII         | * Branch       | Bank of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, to establish a branch located within the Safeway Maui Lani Store at 58 Maui Lani Parkway, Wailuku, Hawaii. | Newspaper:08/08/2013Federal Register:Not applicable  
|Newspaper:             | 08/08/2013    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable
|CBOA FINANCIAL, INC.   | * 3A3          | CBOA Financial, Inc., Tucson, Arizona, to acquire First Scottsdale Bank, National Association, Scottsdale, Arizona.                          | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:08/15/2013   
|Newspaper:             | Not available 
|Federal Register:      | 08/15/2013    
|WILSHIRE BANCORP, INC. | * 3A3          | Wilshire Bancorp, Inc. to acquire Saehan Bancorp, both of Los Angeles, California.                                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:             | Not available 
|Federal Register:      | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us