alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 9, 2013

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|CAPGEN CAPITAL GROUP III LLC | * 3A3         | CapGen Capital Group III LLC and CapGen Capital Group III LP, both of New York, New York, to increase their investment up to 25% of the outstanding common stock of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, Stuart, Florida, and thereby increase their investment in Seacoast National Bank, Stuart, Florida. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 546
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          533
<ALLOWANCES>                                             9
<INVENTORY>                                            141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,567
<PP&E>                                                 288
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  144
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,923
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,032)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,035
<SALES>                                              1,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,163
<CGS>                                                  104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (17)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        320
<INCOME-TAX>                                            81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    239
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert R. Jones, III, President and CEO of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1).
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2).
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 
 
 Date:
November 12, 2010
 
 /s/ Robert R. Jones, IIIRobert R. Jones, IIIPresident and CEO
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0522(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0522(04)

**Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid (notified under document number C(2002) 458) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 119 , 22/05/2002 P. 0022 - 0022 *

Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid

(notified under document number C(2002) 458)

(2002/C 119/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

A number of instruments approved by the Commission over the years contain a provision to the effect that unlawful State aid, i.e. aid put into effect in contravention of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, shall be assessed in accordance with the texts in force at the time when the aid was granted. This is for example the case for the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection(1) and the multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects(2).

For the purpose of transparency and legal certainty, the Commission informs Member States and third parties that it has decided to apply the same rule in respect of all instruments indicating how the Commission will exercise its discretion in order to assess the compatibility of State aid with the common market (frameworks, guidelines, communications, notices). Therefore, the Commission shall always assess the compatibility of unlawful State aid with the common market in accordance with the substantive criteria set out in any instrument in force at the time when the aid was granted.

The present notice is without prejudice to the more specific rules contained in the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty(3).

The present notice is without prejudice to the interpretation of Council and Commission regulations in the field of State aid.

(1) OJ C 37, 3.2.2001, p. 3.

(2) OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 8.

(3) OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2.
#### Cornelius O’Mara, Jr., an Infant, by Cornelius O’Mara, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*Jessie G. Morgan, Appellant.

*O'Hara v. Morgan,*136 App. Div. 904, affirmed.

(Argued January 12, 1911;

decided January 27, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 7, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a *598new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*Edwin Duffey*for appellant.

*Clayton R. Lusk*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
-----Original Message----- 

From: k_ernst@comcast.net [mailto:k_ernst@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete 

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I want this strong rule to become a permanent preventative to forbid 

insurance companies from charging higher copayments, deductibles, and 

other out-of-pocket expenses for mental health treatment than they 

would for other physical health care. Thank you for ensuring that 

mental health care and physical health care coverage are included in a 

single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kate Ernst 

1810 Calle de Sebastian, N-2 

Santa Fe, NM 87505
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0523(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0523(03)

**Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 120 , 23/05/2002 P. 0004 - 0004 *

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France

(2002/C 120/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. France has decided to alter the public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services between Brest (Guipavas) and Ouessant, as published in Official Journal of the European Communities C 157 of 4 June 1999, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. The public service obligation is as follows:

Minimum frequency

The service must be operated all year round except on 1 January and 25 December.

The level of service provided must be at least two return trips per day, morning and late afternoon, from Monday to Sunday.

A third return trip must be provided for at least 180 days per year.

Type of aircraft used and capacity provided

The service must be operated with a turboprop aircraft having a seating capacity of at least nine.

Timetables

Timetables must be such as to enable passengers to make the round trip within the day and to spend at least seven hours at their destination, whether Brest or Ouessant.

Fares and flight bookings

The price of a single ticket must not exceed:

- EUR 56 (plus airport taxes), at 2002 values, as the standard fare,

- EUR 32 (plus airport taxes), at 2002 values, for local residents,

- EUR 15 (plus airport taxes), at 2002 values, for local students.

Children from 2 to 12 who are not eligible for the fare stated in the third indent above must be given a 50 % reduction on the fares stated in the first and second indents.

Children under 2 shall travel free.

Season tickets must also be available.

These maximum fares shall be adjusted each year on the basis of changes in the retail price index over the 12 months.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any IATA scheduled season. The carrier must give six month's notice before discontinuing these services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

3. This public service obligation replaces, with effect from 1 October 2002, the public service obligation concerning scheduled air services between Brest (Guipavas) and Ouessant, as published in Official Journal of the European Communities C 157 of 4 June 1999.
#### Orville Wormuth and another, *Administrators, etc., Respondents, v.*John Hale, *Appellant.*

J udgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10Q of Viropro Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Rajiv Datar, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Claude Gingras, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:




(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/   Rajiv Datar


Rajiv Datar


Chief Executive Officer








/s/   Claude Gingras


Claude Gingras


Chief Financial Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending August 18, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|A.N.B. HOLDING COMPANY, LTD. | * 3A3         | A.N.B. Holding Company, Ltd., Terrell, Texas, to acquire additional shares up to 34% of The ANB Corporation, Terrell, Texas, and indirectly acquire The American National Bank of Texas, Terrell, Texas; Lakeside Bancshares, Inc., Rockwall, Texas; and Lakeside National Bank, Rockwall, Texas. | Newspaper:08/08/2012Federal Register:08/17/2012   
|Newspaper:                   | 08/08/2012   
|Federal Register:            | 08/17/2012   
|HALECO BANCSHARES, INC.      | * 3A3         | HaleCo Bancshares, Inc., Plainview, Texas, to acquire 100 percent of LubCo Bancshares, Inc., Slaton, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Citizens Bank, Slaton, Texas.                                                                                 | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/13/2012
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 09/13/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location         | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMUNITY ST BK, AUSTIN, TEXAS | 646453 | 05/14/2012 | 09/07/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
i~



# ~ PACTIV

~..~ Building Products Division

2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 175 Atlanta, Georgia 30328 Tel 678.589.7300 Fax 678.589.7310 

### Augus$ 27, 2014 

# Statennent of Pactiv Building Products
Edward Bates, Director of Business Development

RE: Proposed Rule on Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Change of Listing Status for Certain Substitutes under the Significant IUew Alternatives Policy Program
1. Pactiv Building Products invested of millions of dollars to comply with the 2010 HCFC phase out and had at least 7 years advance notice to plan and execute. 2. Pactiv Building Products is facing another investment/operating cost increase of millions of dollars with the proposed January 2017 HFC-134A phase out with effectively less than 2 years to plan and execute. 3. XPS Insulation produced with HFC-134A is part of the Global UVarming reduction solution and is fVOT part of the problem. The high HFC-134A retention rates in the product, long product life (life of the structure), and high thermal insulation performance make XPS produced with HFC-134A a net Global Warming reducer. 4. The January 2017 HFC-134A phase out for XPS Insulation is not consistent with the phase down approach that was discussed during our May 2014 meeting. In addition, the January 2017 HFC-134A phase out is not feasible given the lack of commercially available replacements, the significant amount of development work required, the extensive product testing and 3 rdparty compliance approvals required, as well as potential lengthy Air Permitting requirements. 5. Pactiv Building Products believes that a commercially available alternative to HFC-134A for XPS Insulation (equivalent properties & performance) does not currently exist. 6. Pactiv Building Products requests that XPS Insulation be excluded from the HFC-134A phase out due its contributions to Global Warming reduction. 7. If an XPS exclusion is not granted, Pactiv Building Products requests HFC-134A phase out for XPS Insulation be extended to January 2022.
**Exhibit 31(b)****CERTIFICATION**I, Garrett R. Hegel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCompass Bancshares, Inc.; and  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report.Date: April 30, 2007       /s/ Garrett R. Hegel         Garrett R. Hegel    Chief Financial Officer    Compass Bancshares, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7683

PETER LENOX ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS; MICHAEL MURRAY;

DOCTOR ROSAREIO; DOCTOR BRAVES; PHILLIP ADJEI,

Doctor; DOCTOR GETACHEW; JOHN DOE, Doctor;

DOCTOR ALLEN; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT MYLES;

PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT BENNETT; RICHARD LANHAM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1652-S)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Peter Lenox Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Karl

Joseph Nelson, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; John

Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Selena Wilson-Shelton,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen

v. Correctional Med. Sys., No. CA-97-1652-S (D. Md. Oct. 16, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Exhibit 10.39

March 16, 2004

Patrick J. MitchellChairman
and Chief Executive OfficerAscent Assurance, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Suite
3100Fort Worth, Texas 76102

|Re: | Extension of the "Patrick J Mitchell  Employment  Agreement" with Ascent Management,  Inc. and Ascent
                  Assurance, Inc. dated as of December 18, 2002 ("Employment Agreement")
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Mitchell:

The purpose of this letter is to
confirm in writing and memorialize the agreement reached, as of March 15, 2004, between
you, defined as the Executive in the above referenced Employment Agreement,
and each of Ascent Management, Inc. (AMI) and Ascent Assurance, Inc.
(AAI) to extend such Employment Agreement through March 15, 2005. More
specifically, the Expiration Date in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is
March 15, 2004. Therefore, the Employment Agreement, unless extended by mutual agreement
of the parties, would have expired at 12:00 a.m. March 16, 2004.

In consideration of the mutual
promises contained herein, the Executive and each of AMI and AAI hereby amend
such Employment Agreement, as of March 15, 2004, by deleting March 15, 2004 as
the Expiration Date in Section 3 thereof, and substituting in its place,
March 15, 2005 as such Expiration Date. Except as expressly stated
herein, the Employment Agreement is not otherwise modified or amended by the parties, such
that all other definitions, conditions, and terms contained therein shall remain, and all
present and future rights, duties and obligations of the parties thereunder shall continue
throughout both the Executives Term of Employment and as
otherwise provided in such Employment Agreement.

As evidence of the acceptance by AMI
and AAI of the terms of this letter agreement amending the Employment Agreement by
extending it through March 15, 2005, an authorized officer of each, has affixed his
signature hereto. As evidence of your acceptance of such amendment to the

Employment Agreement, please execute
this letter agreement in the space provided herein below.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Patrick H.
ONeill

Patrick H. ONeill

Agreed as to form and substance:

Ascent Management, Inc.

/s/ Patrick H. ONeill 
By: Patrick H. ONeill,
its Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Ascent Assurance, Inc.

/s/ Patrick H. ONeill 
By: Patrick H.
ONeill, its Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

/s/ Patrick J. Mitchell

Patrick J. Mitchell