alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 51164          Scale: 50,000          Edition: 18          Edition Date: 05-FEB-00          CORRECTED TO NTM:  2000/42**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
###### Editorial Note on [Part 192](/current/title-49/part-192?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at [71 FR 33406](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-33406), June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.113 Longitudinal joint factor (E) for steel pipe.

(a) The longitudinal joint factor to be used in the design formula in [§ 192.105](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.105) is determined in accordance with the table 1 to this [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.113#p-192.113(a)):

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)

| Specification | Pipe class | Longitudinal joint factor (E) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ASTM A53/A53M (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Seamless | 1.00 |
| | Electric resistance welded | 1.00 |
| | Furnace butt welded | .60 |
| ASTM A106/A106M (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Seamless | 1.00 |
| ASTM A333/A333M (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Seamless | 1.00 |
| | Electric resistance welded | 1.00 |
| ASTM A381 (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Double submerged arc welded | 1.00 |
| ASTM A671/A671M (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Electric-fusion-welded | 1.00 |
| ASTM A672 (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Electric-fusion-welded | 1.00 |
| ASTM A691/A691M (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Electric-fusion-welded | 1.00 |
| API Spec 5L (incorporated by reference, see [§ 192.7](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-192.7)) | Seamless | 1.00 |
| | Electric resistance welded | 1.00 |
| | Electric flash welded | 1.00 |
| | Submerged arc welded | 1.00 |
| | Furnace butt welded | .60 |
| Other | Pipe over 4 inches (102 millimeters) | .80 |
| Other | Pipe 4 inches (102 millimeters) or less | .60 |

(b) If the type of longitudinal joint cannot be determined, the joint factor to be used must not exceed that designated for “Other.”

[Amdts. 192-135, 195-107, [89 FR 33280](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-33280), Apr. 29, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF EAT AT JOE'S LTD.  AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1998 AND THE  RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         134
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               415
<PP&E>                                         6476
<DEPRECIATION>                                 303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1576
<BONDS>                                        1343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     3807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6728
<SALES>                                        2519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2519
<CGS>                                          702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (85)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.16)
        



</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT.

#### Townsend B. Baldwin agt. William H. Briggs.

*Special Term,*

*March,*1874.

*Dmvwrrer to an answer of counter-claim.*

Where one defendant is sued upon an individual liability, he cannot set up as a counter-claim a claim which he holds jointly with another against the plaintiff.

Van Brunt, *J.*

— It seems to me that the demurrer in this action must he sustained. There are many cases which decide that in a suit against two or more persons, as partners, a several claim in favor of one defendant only cannot he enforced as a counter-claim *(Hurlburt*agt. *Post,*1 *Bosw.,*28; *Peabody*agt. *Bloomer,*3 *Abb. Pr.,*353; 6 *Duer,*53; *Mott*agt. Burnett, 2 *E. D. Smith,*50).

I can see no reason why the converse of the proposition should not be equally true, viz., that where one defendant is sued upon an individual liability, he cannot set up as a counter-claim a claim which he holds jointly with another against the plaintiff. The cause of action constituting the counter-claim must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff, between whom a several judgment might be had in the action *(Sec.*150 *of the Code).*The cause of action set up as a counter-claim in this action does not exist in favor of the defendant, but in favor of the defendant and his copartner against the plaintiff, and does not comply with the requirements of the section. Furthermore, in liti*478gating a claim, either made by a firm or against a firm, the opposite party has a right to have all the members of that firm before the court. The demurrer must be sustained with leave to the defendant to amend his answer upon payment of costs, if he be so advised.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-13-00517-CR

NO. 09-13-00520-CR

____________________

OSCAR SUAREZ JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 13-07-07572 CR and 13-07-07677 CR 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On October 22, 2013, the trial court sentenced Oscar Suarez Jr. on two

convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Suarez 

filed notices of appeal on November 8, 2013. In each case, the trial court certified 

that this is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The district clerk has provided the trial court’s certifications to 

the Court of Appeals. 
2

On November 18, 2013, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the

appeals unless the appellant established the certifications are incorrect. No 

response has been filed. Because the records do not contain certifications that show

the defendant has the right of appeal, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d). 

APPEALS DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

Opinion Delivered December 18, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
From: rexae@ix.netcom.com [mailto:rexae@ix.netcom.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rex English 

2905 W. Sherwin Av 

Chicago, IL 60645
-----Original Message----- 

From: acybermum@msn.com [mailto:acybermum@msn.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Brenda Diaz 

16436 Bridlewood Circle 

Delray Beach, FL 33445
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BROAD
NATIONAL BANCORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           19838
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 35020
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     157021
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           54892
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             54859
<LOANS>                                         323189
<ALLOWANCE>                                       6674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  603513
<DEPOSITS>                                      521996
<SHORT-TERM>                                     13300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              10431
<LONG-TERM>                                      17500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4950
<OTHER-SE>                                       35336
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  603513
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7188
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3282
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   508
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 10978
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3886
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4474
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             6504
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  90
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2855
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2855
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.65
<LOANS-NON>                                       3204
<LOANS-PAST>                                       978
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  1615
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2927
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  6974
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      779
<RECOVERIES>                                       179
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 6674
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              6674
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           5134
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles Partridge, Respondent, v. John J. Haly and another, Appellant.

—Order reversed and motion granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
From: wilmajaffe@comcast.net [mailto:wilmajaffe@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:37 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Wilma Jaffe 

1318 Glenfield Ave 

Oakland, CA 94602
`[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.5 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1114]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.5  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. OBEY:

       On page 16, on line 1, insert ``(less $40,000,000)'', 
     before ``to remain''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

191

<3-line {>

negative

Nays

227`
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                  Exhibit 27.0
<ARTICLE>                     5


[TYPE]            EX-27
<LEGEND>
                  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                  FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEETS  AND   CONSOLIDATED
                  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  FOUND ON PAGES F-2, F-3 AND F-4 OF
                  THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
                  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        410,883
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               2,778,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (88,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                 4,317,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            7,612,781
<PP&E>                                                      4,817,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                              2,858,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              9,645,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       3,662,799
<BONDS>                                                     2,851,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       55,406
<OTHER-SE>                                                  2,898,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                9,645,484
<SALES>                                                    21,263,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           21,263,753
<CGS>                                                      17,212,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              17,212,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            3,417,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           (316,604)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               400,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   62,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           338,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  338,777
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .06


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1910 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1910

      To permit the current refunding of certain tax-exempt bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 1995

 Mr. Taylor of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To permit the current refunding of certain tax-exempt bonds.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CURRENT REFUNDINGS OF CERTAIN TAX-EXEMPT BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 10632 of the Revenue Act 
of 1987 (relating to bonds issued by Indian tribal governments) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The 
amendments made by this section shall not apply to any obligation 
issued after such date if--
            ``(1) such obligation is issued (or is part of a series of 
        obligations issued) to refund an obligation issued on or before 
        such date,
            ``(2) the average maturity date of the issue of which the 
        refunding obligation is a part is not later than the average 
        maturity date of the obligations to be refunded by such issue,
            ``(3) the amount of the refunding obligation does not 
        exceed the outstanding amount of the refunded obligation, and
            ``(4) the net proceeds of the refunding obligation are used 
        to redeem the refunded obligation not later than 90 days after 
        the date of the issuance of the refunding obligation.
For purposes of paragraph (2), average maturity shall be determined in 
accordance with section 147(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to refunding obligations issued after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
  /s/ Cameron R. NelsonCameron R. NelsonVice President, Finance &
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

QLT Inc. 133
#### § 176.320 Use of hand flashlights.

Each hand flashlight used on deck near or in any hold or compartment containing a Class 3 (flammable) liquid, must be suitable for use in hazardous locations where fire or explosion hazards may exist.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERD PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-30320 and 333-24749) of Pressure
Biosciences, Inc. (formerly Boston Biomedica, Inc.) of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to the financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, which appears in this Annual Report Form 10-KSB.

|/s/WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.        |  | 
|---------------------------------- |  | 
|Boca Raton, Florida
April 22, 2005 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with this Amendment to Annual Report of China Logistic Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
July 28,
2010                                                                      
/s/ Wanwen
Su
 Wanwen
Su
 President,
Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller