alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1749 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1749

  To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to eliminate the market 
                           promotion program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 1995

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. Zimmer) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to 
the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to eliminate the market 
                           promotion program.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Market Promotion Program Elimination 
Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARKET PROMOTION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 203 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 
(7 U.S.C. 5623) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 211 of the Agricultural Trade 
Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5641) is amended by striking subsection (c).
    (c) Use of Savings for Deficit Reduction.--None of the changes in 
direct spending resulting from the amendments made by this section 
shall be reflected in estimates under section 252(d) of the Balanced 
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
                                 <all>
```
#### Philando C. Langdon, *Respondent, v.*Charles E. Evans, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. *J.;*

Pratt, J., not sitting.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19E0011. DAVID SUNDY et al. v. CHARLES BAKER et al.

Having read and considered the “Rule 40(b) Emergency Motion for Process to

be Issued” the same is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 19, 2018

09/19/2018
From: drm64@charter.net [mailto:drm64@charter.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

UI am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul 

Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity 

Act of 2008 (RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Vic Stone 

1700 Summer St. Apt. C-98 

Manchester, TN 37355
#### § 1004.1 Gifts, donations, and hospitality by carriers.

It is unlawful for any common carrier engaged in interstate or foreign commerce to offer, make, or cause any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any person. Gifts or services or anything of substantial value to particular shippers or their representatives are considered violations of the law. Expenditures for such gifts may not support requests to increase carrier rates. The Board shall take appropriate enforcement action to redress such unlawful expenditures.
§ 179.100-18 Tests of tanks. ( a ) Each tank shall be tested by completely filling tank and manway nozzle with water or other liquid having similar viscosity, at a temperature which shall not exceed 100 °F during the test; and applying the pressure prescribed in § 179.101. The tank shall hold the prescribed pressure for at least 10 minutes without leakage or evidence of distress.
( b ) Insulated tanks shall be tested before insulation is applied.
( c ) Caulking of welded joints to stop leaks developed during the foregoing test is prohibited. Repairs in welded joints shall be made as prescribed in AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix W (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( d ) Testing of exterior heaters is not a specification requirement.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967; 66 FR 45186, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 FR 75760, Dec. 31, 2003]
-----Original Message----- 

From: nikki.pachecotheard@gmail.com 

[mailto:nikki.pachecotheard@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lauren Pacheco Theard 

3693 S. Puma Dr. 

Coeur d Alene, ID 83814
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Clinton H. HowardClinton H. HowardChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 24, 2006
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.15 Goals 2000]
[Page 700]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.15  goals 2000

  Mr. GOODLING moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1045) 
to amend the Goals 2000: Educate America Act to eliminate the National 
Education Standards and Improvement Council, and for other purposes; as 
amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WELLER, recognized Mr. GOODLING and Mr. 
KILDEE, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WELLER, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

29–011 1996

104th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 104–203

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES

OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, THE SUPREME

COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE THAT HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE COURT, PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. 2072

APRIL 24, 1996.—Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and ordered

to be printed.
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
§ 70.05-18 Applicability to vessels operating under an exemption afforded in the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 (PVSA). ( a ) The Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 (PVSA) contained an allowance for the exemption of certain passenger vessels that are— ( 1 ) At least 100 gross tons but less than 300 gross tons; or
( 2 ) Former public vessels of at least 100 gross tons but less than 500 gross tons.
( b ) The owner or operator of a vessel must have applied for an exemption under the PVSA by June 21, 1994, and then brought the vessel into compliance with the interim guidance in Navigation and Inspection Circular (NVIC) 7-94 not later than December 21, 1996. The PVSA exemption is valid for the service life of the vessel, as long as the vessel remains certified for passenger service. If the Certificate of Inspection (COI) is surrendered or otherwise becomes invalid (not including a term while the vessel is out of service but undergoing an inspection for recertification), the owner or operator must meet the appropriate inspection regulations to obtain a new COI without the PVSA exemption. See 46 CFR 175.118 for information about applicable regulations for vessels that operate under the PVSA exemption.
[USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34791, May 15, 2002]
Case 5:15-cv-12333-SJM-DRG ECF No. 61, PageID.354 Filed 05/31/23 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:15-cv-12333-SJM-DRG ECF No. 61, PageID.355 Filed 05/31/23 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:15-cv-12333-SJM-DRG ECF No. 61, PageID.356 Filed 05/31/23 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-77816) pertaining to the Employees' incentive stock options and other
stock option and warrant agreements of Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. of our report
dated August 31, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended June 30, 2001.



                                                          Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
September 21, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements filed with the Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         244,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               789,037
<PP&E>                                      31,233,412
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,545,531)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,476,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          444,520
<BONDS>                                     19,788,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,243,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,476,918
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,576,981
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,726,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               837,763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,499,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (486,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (486,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (18.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-30320, 333-24749 and 333-128594) and Form S-3 (File
      No.
      333-148227) of Pressure BioSciences, Inc. (formerly Boston Biomedica, Inc.)
      of
      our report dated March 27, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
      statements which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is included
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., for the year
      ended December 31, 2007.




/s/
      UHY
      LLP




Boston,
      Massachusetts


March
      27,
      2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER  31, 1999 AND THE RELATED  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 OF ARIZONA LAND INCOME  CORPORATION AND IS
QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  THIS
EXHIBIT  SHALL  NOT BE  DEEMED  FILED  FOR  THE  PURPOSE  OF  SECTION  11 OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR
OTHERWISE  SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH  SECTIONS,  NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A
PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH  INCORPORATES  THIS REPORT BY  REFERENCE,  UNLESS
SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,326
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           231
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   809
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    923
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (120)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,043
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant and Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Lands Required for the Opening of Mount Vernon Avenue. Alfred Hutter et al., as Executors of Leopold Hutter et al., Respondents and Appellants.

(Submitted November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 559.)
Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 2 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 3 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 4 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 5 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 6 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 7 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 8 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 9 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 10 of 11Case 1:11-cv-01548-ABJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 11 of 11
From: Peter W eaver <RPW eaver@ilta.org>

To: Dallas Burkholder/AA/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Katie Vassalli <KVassalli@ilta.org> Date: 08/31/2012 01:36 PM Subject: 8/30 Notice Requesting Comment on Letters Seeking W aiver of RFS 

### Good afternoon Dallas, In reviewing EPA’s aforementioned notice, we see that a correction identifies the publication date as having been delayed by three days. Correspondingly, one would reasonably expect the required receipt date to have been extended to maintain the stated 30
- da y period. I am writing to ask if EPA will be sending an update to revise the submission deadline appropriately to September 29, 2012, allowing for 30 days to comment following constructive notice. Thank you for your consideration,

- Peter
**R. Peter Weaver Director of Regulatory Compliance and Safety**  **International Liquid Terminals Association** 

### 1005 N. Glebe Rd., Suite 600 Arlington, VA, 22201 (703) 875
- 2011 www.ilta.org
-----Original Message----- 

From: shapiro.emily@gmail.com [mailto:shapiro.emily@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Emily Shapiro 

392 Central Park West 

New York, NY 10025
#### John S. Blandon, *Respondent, v.*Curtiss S. Moses, *as Trustee, etc., Appellant.*

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofBoston Biomedica, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I, Kevin W. Quinlan,President, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of Boston Biomedica, Inc., aMassachusetts corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

 

(1)           The  Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: March 26, 2004 | */s/*  | *Kevin W. Quinlan*                               |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Kevin W. Quinlan                                 |
|                  |   | President, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                    |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Boston Biomedica, Inc. and will be retained by BostonBiomedica, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
§ 172.448 CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY label. ( a ) Except for size and color, the CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY label must be as follows:
( b ) The CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY label must be black on an orange background.
( c ) A CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY label conforming to the specifications in this section and in § 172.407(c)(2) in effect on October 1, 2008, may be used until January 1, 2013.
[74 FR 2252, Jan. 14, 2009, as amended at 75 FR 72, Jan. 4, 2010]
§ 178.337-16 Testing. ( a ) *Inspection and tests.* Inspection of materials of construction of the cargo tank and its appurtenances and original test and inspection of the finished cargo tank and its appurtenances must be as required by Section VIII of the ASME Code (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter) and as further required by this specification, except that for cargo tanks constructed in accordance with part UHT in Section VIII of the ASME Code the original test pressure must be at least twice the cargo tank design pressure.
( b ) *Weld testing and inspection.* ( 1 ) Each cargo tank constructed in accordance with part UHT in Section VIII of the ASME Code must be subjected, after postweld heat treatment and hydrostatic tests, to a wet fluorescent magnetic particle inspection to be made on all welds in or on the cargo tank shell and heads both inside and out. The method of inspection must conform to appendix 6 in Section VIII of the ASME Code except that permanent magnets shall not be used.
( 2 ) On cargo tanks of over 3,500 gallons water capacity other than those described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section unless fully radiographed, a test must be made of all welds in or on the shell and heads both inside and outside by either the wet fluorescent magnetic particle method conforming to appendix U in Section VIII of the ASME Code, liquid dye penetrant method, or ultrasonic testing in accordance with appendix 12 in Section VIII of the ASME Code. Permanent magnets must not be used to perform the magnetic particle inspection.
( c ) All defects found shall be repaired, the cargo tanks shall then again be postweld heat treated, if such heat treatment was previously performed, and the repaired areas shall again be tested.
[Order 59-B, 30 FR 582, Jan. 16, 1965. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 178-7, 34 FR 18250, Nov. 14, 1969; Amdt. 178-99, 58 FR 51534, Oct. 1, 1993; Amdt. 178-118, 61 FR 51340, Oct. 1, 1996; 68 FR 75753, Dec. 31, 2003]
98-2157.

#### Erie Ins. Co. v. Favor.

Franklin App. No. 97APE12-1693. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1451, 703 N.E.2d 329. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.