alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,847
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,342
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     95,604
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         275,429
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           274,087
<LOANS>                                      1,066,918
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,473,054
<DEPOSITS>                                     964,133
<SHORT-TERM>                                    58,040
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,763
<LONG-TERM>                                    345,997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           55,536
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,473,054
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 86,151
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,158
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               104,309
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              43,859
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,546
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           42,763
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 39,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,344
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,995
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.26
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,621
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 15,900
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,081
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,530
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,391
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,042
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,042
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1113.12 Exhibits. ( a ) *Copies.* Unless the officer otherwise directs, the original and 10 copies of each exhibit of a documentary character should be furnished for the use of the Board. The original will be delivered to the reporter, and the copy to the officer. If the hearing is before a board, a copy of the exhibit should be furnished to each member of the board, unless the board otherwise directs. Unless the officer for cause directs otherwise, a reasonable number of copies should be furnished to counsel in attendance at the hearing.
( b ) *Interchange prior to hearing.* Whenever practicable, the parties should interchange copies of exhibits or other pertinent material or matter before or at the commencement of the hearing; and the Board or presiding officer may so direct.
( c ) *When excluded how treated.* When exhibit has been identified, objected to, and excluded, the officer will develop whether the party offering the exhibit withdraws the offer, and if so, permit the return of the exhibit to him. If the excluded exhibit is not withdrawn, it should be given an exhibit number for identification and be incorporated in the record. Exhibit numbers once used for identification will not be duplicated thereafter.
[47 FR 49559, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 19301, May 27, 1988; 61 FR 52712, Oct. 8, 1996]
-----Original Message----- 

From: fattahipour@yahoo.com [mailto:fattahipour@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fattahipour Darius 

"7215 Calabria Court, #82" 

San Diego, CA 92122
§ 1312.15 Change of carrier or agent. ( a ) *Change in carrier.* When a carrier's name is lawfully changed, or a fiduciary assumes possession and control of a carrier's property, all affected tariffs must be amended to reflect the change. The amendments required by this paragraph shall be filed promptly and, if possible, prior to their effective date, but in no case later than 60 days thereafter. Regardless of the date the tariff is actually filed, the effective date for an amendment required by this paragraph is the date the event occurs. A water carrier that publishes, files, and keeps its tariffs electronically in accordance with § 1312.4(b) shall promptly submit any such change by email to *tariffs@stb.gov*, but in no case later than 20 days after the effective date.
( b ) *Change of agent.* When a new agent is appointed to take over an agency, or when an alternate agent assumes the duties of the principal agent, each of the superseded agent's effective tariffs shall immediately be amended to reflect the change, bearing an effective date the same as the date of the transfer. In the case of a new agent, this may only occur after one or more of the participating carriers issues a power of attorney to the new agent, and revokes the previous power of attorney. At the same time, all affected tariffs will be amended to reflect the new powers of attorney, and all carriers who have not issued them must be canceled from the tariff. A water carrier that publishes, files, and keeps its tariffs electronically in accordance with § 1312.4(b) shall promptly submit any such change of agent by email to *tariffs@stb.gov*, but in no case later than 200 days after the effective date.
[62 FR 19058, Apr. 18, 1997, as amended at 84 FR 20296, May 9, 2019]
§ 1570.121 Recordkeeping and availability. ( a ) *Retention.* Each owner/operator required to have a security program under subpart B to parts 1580, 1582, and 1584 of this subchapter must— ( 1 ) Retain security training records for each individual required to receive security training under §§ 1580.115, 1582.115, and 1584.115 that, at a minimum— ( i ) Includes employee's full name, job title or function, date of hire, and date of initial and recurrent security training; and
( ii ) Identifies the date, course name, course length, and list of topics addressed for the security training most recently provided in each of the areas required under §§ 1580.115, 1582.115, and 1584.115 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) Retain records of initial and recurrent security training for no less than five (5) years from the date of training.
( 3 ) Provide records to current and former employees upon request and at no charge as necessary to provide proof of training.
( b ) *Electronic records.* Each owner/operator required to retain records under this section may keep them in electronic form. An owner/operator may maintain and transfer records through electronic transmission, storage, and retrieval provided that the electronic system provides for the maintenance of records as originally submitted without corruption, loss of data, or tampering.
( c ) *Protection of SSI.* Each owner/operator must restrict the distribution, disclosure, and availability of security sensitive information, as identified in part 1520 of this chapter, to persons with a need to know. The owner/operator must refer requests for such information by other persons to TSA.
( d ) *Availability.* Each owner/operator must make the records available to TSA upon request for inspection and copying.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.307 Exceptions for compressed gases. ( a ) The following materials are not subject to the requirements of this subchapter: ( 1 ) Carbonated beverages.
( 2 ) Tires when inflated to pressures not greater than their rated inflation pressures. For transportation by air, tires and tire assemblies must meet the conditions in § 175.8(b)(4) of this subchapter.
( 3 ) Balls used for sports.
( 4 ) Refrigerating machines, including dehumidifiers and air conditioners, and components thereof, such as precharged tubing containing: ( i ) 12 kg (25 pounds) or less of a non-flammable, non-toxic gas;
( ii ) 12 L (3 gallons) or less of ammonia solution (UN2672);
( iii ) Except when offered or transported by air, 12 kg (25 pounds) or less of a flammable, non-toxic gas;
( iv ) Except when offered or transported by air or vessel, 20 kg (44 pounds) or less of a Group A1 refrigerant specified in ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 15 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter); or
( v ) 100 g (4 ounces) or less of a flammable, non-toxic liquefied gas.
( 5 ) Manufactured articles or apparatuses, other than light bulbs each containing not more than 100 mg (0.0035 ounce) of inert gas and packaged so that the quantity of inert gas per package does not exceed 1 g (0.035 ounce).
( 6 ) Light bulbs (lamps) conforming to the requirements of § 173.11.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Amdt. 173-94, 41 FR 16081, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 173-135, 45 FR 13090, Feb. 28, 1980; 65 FR 50462, Aug. 18, 2000; 68 FR 45038, July 31, 2003; 68 FR 75745, Dec. 31, 2003; 69 FR 76174, Dec. 20, 2004; 71 FR 14604, Mar. 22, 2006; 74 FR 2266, Jan. 14, 2009; 76 FR 3380, Jan. 19, 2011; 80 FR 1162, Jan. 8, 2015; 85 FR 83400, Dec. 21, 2020]
1

Sky-View	Aerial	Services LLC

Charles	F.	Jacques	Jr. ,	Member

602	Centerton	Road

Pittsgrove,	NJ	08318

Phone:	(609)	315-9997

Email:	chuckjacques@comcast.net

July	7,	2015

Ms.	Brenda	Robeson

Program	Analyst,	Aircraft	and	Airport	Rules	Division

Federal	Aviation	Administration

800	Independence	Ave,	SW

Washington,	D.	C.	20591

Subject:	Sky-View	Aerial	Services,	LLC	Public	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-1346

			Supplemental	Information	

Dear	Ms.	Robeson,

In	response	to	your	letter	dated	July	1,	2015,	I	respectfully	submit	the	additional	information	

you’ve	requested	in	order	to	comply	with	the	requirements	of	14 CFR	§11.81.		In	your	letter,	

you	requested	that	I	specifically	address	the	following:

-The	reasons	why	granting	the	request	would	be	in	the	public	interest;	that	is,	how	it	would	

benefit	the	public	as	a	whole.

-Any	additional	information,	views,	or	arguments available	to	support	your	request.

I	trust	you	will	find	these	attachments	sufficient	to	reconsider	my	petition.	

Respectfully	submitted;

Charles	Jacques	Jr.
2

Sky-View	Aerial	Services	LLC

Public	Interest:

Given	the small	size of the UA	involved	and	the limited	environment	within	which	it	will	

operate,	its	proposed	operation	“falls	squarely within	that	zone of safety (an	equivalent	

level	of safety) in	which	Congress	envisioned	that	the FAA	must,	by exemption,	allow	

commercial	operations of UAS to	commence immediately.”	 Also	because of the size of the

UA	and	the restricted	areas	in	which	the sUAS will	operate,	the	petitioner asserts	approval	

of the application	presents	no	national	security issue. Additionally,	the	ability	to	conduct	

the	types	of	missions	outlined	in	the	Sky-View	petition	by	a	craft	significantly	smaller	that	a	

manned	aircraft	and	carrying	no	passengers,	crew	or	flammable	fuel	significantly	enhances	

safety	to	the	general	public	as	well	as	those	involved	with	the	mission.	

Granting the requested	exemptions	is	in	the public interest	because of (1) the clear

direction	in	section	333	of Public Law	112–95, (2) the strong	equivalent	level	of safety

surrounding the proposed	operations,	and	(3) the significant	public	benefit,	including	

enhanced	safety and	reduction	in	environmental	impacts (such	as	reduced	emissions	

associated	with	allowing sUAS for photography and	inspection operations).

Additional	consideration:

The	FAA	has	set	precedence in	granting	petitions	to	other	entities	that propose	to	engage	

in	the	same	or	similar	types	of	activities	under	essentially	the	same	operating	parameters.	

Below	is	a	list	of	exemptions		granted	which	we	believe	engage	in	operations	similar	to	

those	we	propose.

-11062	Astraeus	Aerial

-11109	Clayco	Inc.

-11112	VDOS	Global

-11213	Aeryon	Labs,	Inc.

-11969	HighGround	Images,	LLC

-11941	soaring	Sky,	LLC

-11940	Aerial	Associates	Photography,	Inc.

-11947	Daniel	C.	Augspurger
-----Original Message----- 

From: mkirton@wi.rr.com [mailto:mkirton@wi.rr.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

margaret kirton 

136 huson court 

plymouth, WI 53073
UBE Scientific Analysis Laboratory Inc. (Seal) 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,739
<INVENTORY>                                     23,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,293
<PP&E>                                         432,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 680,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,586
<BONDS>                                        594,723
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,817)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   680,606
<SALES>                                        296,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,642
<CGS>                                          285,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  285,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (26,214)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,384)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.38)


</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 23, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30811

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK E. AMOS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CV-1114

USDC No. 2:98-CR-146-1

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark E. Amos was convicted pursuant to his guilty plea of

possession with intent to distribute marijuana and conspiracy

to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. He appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence as

being time-barred. The district court granted a certificate of

appealability as to this issue. Notwithstanding his assertions to

the contrary, United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is not
2

retroactively applicable to his motion. See United States v.

Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604-05 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 178.500 Purpose, scope and definitions. ( a ) This subpart prescribes certain requirements for non-bulk packagings for hazardous materials. Standards for these packagings are based on the UN Recommendations.
( b ) Terms used in this subpart are defined in § 171.8 of this subchapter.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2021 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2021

  To release restrictions imposed on the use of certain real property 
  conveyed by the Secretary of the Interior to Lawrence County, Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1995

 Mr. Cremeans introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To release restrictions imposed on the use of certain real property 
  conveyed by the Secretary of the Interior to Lawrence County, Ohio.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST REGARDING USE OF PREVIOUSLY 
              CONVEYED PROPERTY IN LAWRENCE COUNTY, OHIO.

    (a) Release Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall release, 
without consideration, the reversionary interest of the United States 
in the real property described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description.--The real property referred to in subsection (a) 
is a parcel of real property consisting of approximately 15.41 acres 
located in Fayette Township, Lawrence County, Ohio, which was 
originally conveyed by the Secretary of the Interior to the Board of 
Lawrence County Commissioners pursuant to section 203(k)(2) of the 
Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 
484(k)(2)).
    (c) Instrument of Release.--The Secretary shall execute and file in 
the appropriate office or offices a deed of release, amended deed, or 
other appropriate instrument effectuating the release of the 
reversionary interest under this section.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2403

KENNETH WAYNE DODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RESTON SECURITY OFFICE, Defendant - Appellee, and NATIONAL IMAGERY AND MAPPING AGENCY, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-1826-A) Submitted: May 12, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Wayne Dodson, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Wayne Dodson noted an appeal of a proceeding held on September 5, 1997, in which the magistrate judge deferred deciding the issue of damages associated with a default judgment and instead inquired into the sufficiency of service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Dodson's informal brief only addresses whether the magistrate judge erred by refusing to hear argument on proof of damages at theSeptember 5, 1997, hearing. Dodson did not appeal the final judgment. Because Dodson only challenges the hearing in his informal brief, it is the only issue reviewable on appeal. See 4th Cir. Local R. 34(b).Although this appeal was interlocutory when filed, the district court's entry of judgment before consideration of the appeal confers jurisdiction on this court under the doctrine of cumulative finality. See Equipment Fin. Group, Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347 (4th Cir. 1992). We find that the magistrate judge did not err in inquiring into the propriety of service,a jurisdictional matter, rather than assessing damages. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.16 Permission to File Report]
[Page 820]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.16  permission to file report

  On motion of Mr. DORNAN, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
National Security was granted permission until midnight Monday, June 5, 
1995, to file a report on the bill (H.R. 1530) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military activities of the 
Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for 
fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 11, 1995 (64), Para 64.29 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 535]
[Page 693]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.64.29  providing for the consideration of h.r. 535

  Mr. McINNIS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-116) the resolution (H. Res. 144) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 535) to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to convey the Corning National Fish Hatchery to the State of 
Arkansas.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: twotutors@seanet.com [mailto:twotutors@seanet.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Kendziorski 

11731 Bartlett Ave NE 

Seattle, WA 98125