alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 91297          Scale: 10,000          Edition: 9          Edition Date: 29-MAR-86          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1986/22**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
-----Original Message----- 

From: lturchi@asu.edu [mailto:lturchi@asu.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:49 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Turchi 

16703 E Oxford Dr 

Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM - FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         102,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (28,822)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,896
<PP&E>                                         143,254
<DEPRECIATION>                               (106,120)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 668,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,793,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       227,244
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,157,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   668,879
<SALES>                                        315,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,294
<CGS>                                           56,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (73,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (73,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (73,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.008)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.008)
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00398

- CR

IN RE David Munoz VEGA

From the 63rd Judi cial District Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10324

Honorable Enrique Fernandez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: P atricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. C hapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The Relator's Motion to Withdraw the Motion for Leave to File Mandamus Petition is

hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORD ERED on September 30, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33398-33399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14178]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7496]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations; ``Lyonel Feininger: At the Edge of the World''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Lyonel Feininger: At the Edge of the 
World,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, New York, from on or 
about June 30, 2011, until on or about October 16, 2011, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The

[[Page 33399]]

mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor 
(Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 1, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-14178 Filed 6-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 190
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

§ 190.206 Amendment of plans or procedures. ( a ) A Regional Director begins a proceeding to determine whether an operator's plans or procedures required under parts 192, 193, 195, and 199 of this subchapter are inadequate to assure safe operation of a pipeline facility by issuing a notice of amendment. The notice will specify the alleged inadequacies and the proposed revisions of the plans or procedures and provide an opportunity to respond. The notice will allow the operator 30 days following receipt of the notice to submit written comments, revised procedures, or a request for a hearing under § 190.211.
( b ) After considering all material presented in writing or at the hearing, if applicable, the Associate Administrator determines whether the plans or procedures are inadequate as alleged. The Associate Administrator issues an order directing amendment of the plans or procedures if they are inadequate, or withdraws the notice if they are not. In determining the adequacy of an operator's plans or procedures, the Associate Administrator may consider: ( 1 ) Relevant pipeline safety data;
( 2 ) Whether the plans or procedures are appropriate for the particular type of pipeline transportation or facility, and for the location of the facility;
( 3 ) The reasonableness of the plans or procedures; and
( 4 ) The extent to which the plans or procedures contribute to public safety.
( c ) An order directing amendment of an operator's plans or procedures prescribed in this section may be in addition to, or in conjunction with, other appropriate enforcement actions prescribed in this subpart.
[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58910, Sept. 25, 2013]
1 Introduction and Plan Contents

Page 1-20 Petrobras America Inc. Development Operations Coordination Document Cascade / Chinook Development Project 

### 1(e) Pollution Prevention Measures Florida is not an Affected State for the Cascade / Chinook Development Project. As a result, a discussion of the measures to prevent the discharge of oils and greases from drilling rigs or platforms during rainfall and routine operations is not required per NTL 2008 G04. PAI has complied with the requirements of NTL 2010 N 06 which are covered specifically in Section 9 – Oil Spill Information. PAI will comply with the requirements of the Drilling Safety Rule and NTL 2010 N 10 with respect to well containment. Supporting documentation will be provided with the Application for Permit to Drill (APD) subsequent to the approval of this Supplemental DOCD. 

### 1(f) Additional Safety and Pollution Prevention Measures PAI utilized this section in the Initial DOCD to summarize a number of additional safety and pollution prevention features beyond the requirements of 30 CFR 250. In order to prevent redundancy, these items are bulleted below but the details have been deleted from this submittal since the primary focus is the drilling of the third well. Those items in the original list included:

 Subsea Booster Pumps (Technology New to GoM)  Free Standing Hybrid Risers (Technology New to GoM)  FPSO – General (Technology New to GoM)  FPSO - Single Point Mooring System (Technology New to GoM)  FPSO - Polyester Mooring System (Technology New to GoM)  FPSO - Torpedo Piles (Technology New to GoM) Although this item was approved for use, PAI has opted not to utilize Torpedo Piles for this project.  Shuttle Vessels (Technology New to GoM)  FPSO - Offloading to Shuttle Vessels (Technology New to GoM)
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2023-1992 

LT Case No. 2015-CA-992

_____________________________

LEE E. GAINES, 

Appellant,

v.

ROBERT LEE GAINES, II,

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 

THE ESTATE OF ROBERT LEE 

GAINES, 

Appellees. 

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Katie L. Dearing, Judge. 

Lee E. Gaines, Jacksonville, pro se. 

Robert Lee Gaines, II, Jacksonville, pro se. 

July 2, 2024 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 
2

JAY, SOUD, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 22, 1995 (70), Para 70.6 After Recess--4:00 P.M.]
[Page 804]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.70.6  after recess--4:00 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SOLOMON, called the House to order.
```
#### Bartlett *v.*Bailey.

A person peeking to avoid his contract on the ground of infancy, must account for what he has received under it by restoring or paying the value of whatever remains *in specie*within his control, and allowing for the benefit derived from whatever cannot be restored *in specie.*

AsstjmpsIt, to recover the price of milk sold and delivered to the defendant, who wa,s a minor engaged in the milk business. The milk purchased of the plaintiff was sold by the defendant to his customers. The defendant pleaded infancy.

Andrews, for the plaintiff.

Osgood, for the defendant.

Clark, J.

In *Heath*v. Stevens, 48 N. H. 251, 252, *Perley,*C. J., said, — “ It is now extremely well settled, that if an infant would rescind his voidable contract, and recover back what he has paid under it, or compensation for what he has done under it, he must *409first restore the tiring that he received under the contract, if it remains *in specie,*and within his control ; or if not, must account for the value of it. But if what he has received has been consumed, or for any other cause cannot be returned *in specie,*he may recover for what he paid or did under the contract by deducting what he received, or the value of it, from the amount that he paid, or from the value of the services which he rendered.” The principle thus declared to be firmly established is this, that a person seeking to avoid his contract on the ground of infancy must account for what he has received under it by restoring or paying the value of whatever remains *in specie*within his control, and allowing for the benefit derived from whatever cannot be restored *in specie.*This doctrine has been repeatedly recognized in actions brought to recover what has been paid, or compensation for what has been done, under contracts made by infants. No reason exists why it is not equally applicable to cases where infancy is set up as a defence. Whether an infant is plaintiff or defendant in an action cannot affect his legal rights as to his contracts. In either case, the law affords him ample protection by making the benefit received by him the measure of bis legal liability. This rule was declared, and the reasons sustaining it fully stated, in the recent case of *Hall*v. *Butterfield, ante,*354. Upon the authority of that case, the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant the value of the benefit derived by him from the purchase of the milk of the plaintiff.

*Case discharged.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 29, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.23 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1139]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.23  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. TIAHRT:

       Page 55, line 5, strike ``$384,504,000'' and insert 
     ``$220,950,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

144

negative

Nays

267
```
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Annual Report of Equity  Technologies  & Resources,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, James Kemper  Millard,  Chief  Executive  Officer (or  equivalent
thereof) and Chief  Financial  Officer (or  equivalent  thereof) of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                             /s/ James Kemper Millard
                            -----------------------------------------
                            James Kemper Millard
                            Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                            Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                            September 29, 2003
#### Elizabeth Cross, *Appellant, v.*John A. Cross and another, *Respondents.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event; order of reference vacated. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., dissenting.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 28, 1995 (51), Para 51.7 Message from the Senate]
[Page 506]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.51.7  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Hallen, one of its clerks, announced 
that the Senate had passed with an amendment in which the concurrence of 
the House is requested, a bill of the House of the following title:

       H.R. 831. An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to permanently extend the deduction for the health insurance 
     costs of self-employed individuals, to repeal the provision 
     permitting nonrecognition of gain on sales and exchanges 
     effectuating policies of the Federal Communications 
     Commission, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed a bill of the 
following title, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 4. An Act to grant the power to the President to reduce 
     budget authority.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1832 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1832

                  For the relief of Bruce L. Holland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1995

   Mr. Wise introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Bruce L. Holland.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO PERSONAL MONETARY LOSSES.

    The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to pay out 
of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Bruce L. 
Holland of Charleston, West Virginia, the amount of personal monetary 
losses he incurred due to the Social Security Administration errors in 
processing his disability forms on April 14, 1991.
                                 <all>
```
§ 176.140 Segregation from other classes of hazardous materials. ( a ) Class 1 (explosive) materials must be segregated from other packaged hazardous materials in accordance with § 176.83.
( b ) Class 1 (explosive) materials must be segregated from bulk solid dangerous cargoes in accordance with the IMDG Code (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter). Notwithstanding § 176.83(b), ammonium nitrate and sodium nitrate may be stowed together with blasting explosives, except those containing chlorates, provided the mixed stowage is treated as blasting explosives (see § 176.410(e)).
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 68 FR 45041, July 31, 2003; 68 FR 75748, Dec. 31, 2003]
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 91160          Scale: 200,000          Edition: 3          Edition Date: 19-AUG-95          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1995/44**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6444

SHAVIS HOLLOMAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv - 00295

- AWA

- RJK )

Submitted : September 20, 2019 Decided: October 25, 2019

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Shavis Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shavis Holloman seeks to appeal the district court’s order acceptin g the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonab le jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on p rocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holloman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED