alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kye A. Abraham certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB-A1 of the small business issuer; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:5-31-07By:/s/Kye AbrahamKye Abraham, President, Chairman of the Board and Director
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.33


                          PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.

                    2003 LONG-TERM EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN



         The 2003 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan (the "Plan") of
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") will be administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee"). The
Company's executive officers and certain key employees (together, the "Eligible
Employees") will be eligible to participate in the Plan.

1.       Stock Option Grants.

         (a)      If the Company's EPS, as presented in the Company's audited
                  consolidated balance sheet for the fiscal year ended December
                  31, 2003 (the "2003 EPS"), does not exceed the Company's EPS,
                  as presented in the Company's audited consolidated balance
                  sheet for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "2002
                  EPS"), by at least 20%, no stock options will be granted.

         (b)      If the Company's 2003 EPS exceeds the Company's 2002 EPS by
                  not less than 20%, and not more than 30%, the Company will
                  grant stock options to the Eligible Employees to purchase
                  that number of shares of Common Stock which is equal to not
                  less than 1.00%, and not more than 2.00%, of the Company's
                  issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of December
                  31, 2003, the exact number to be determined in the sole
                  discretion of the Committee.

         (c)      If the Company's 2003 EPS exceeds the Company's 2002 EPS by
                  more than 30%, the Company will grant stock options to the
                  Eligible Employees to purchase that number of shares of
                  Common Stock which is equal to 2.00% of the Company's issued
                  and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of December 31,
                  2003.

2.       Allocation of Stock Options. In the event stock options are granted
         under the Plan, the Committee shall meet with the Company's Chief
         Executive Officer on or before March 31, 2004 to determine the
         allocation of the stock options to the Eligible Employees.

3.       Vesting and Terms of Stock Options. Any stock options granted pursuant
         to the Plan shall be issued under the Company's Equity Incentive Plan
         and subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Company's Equity
         Incentive Plan. In addition, such stock options shall vest and become
         exercisable over three years, with 25% vesting on the date of grant
         and 25% vesting on the anniversary of the date of grant over the next
         three years.
Exhibit 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors Lab Holdings, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-78593) on Form S-8 of Lab Holdings, Inc. of our report dated
March 8, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lab
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows and related schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-K of Lab Holdings, Inc.



                                KPMG LLP



Kansas City, Missouri
June 30, 1999
§ 179.200-14 Expansion capacity. ( a ) Tanks shall have expansion capacity as prescribed in this subchapter. This capacity shall be provided in the tank for Class DOT-111A cars, or in a dome for Class DOT-103 and 104 type cars.
( b ) For tank cars having an expansion dome, the expansion capacity is the total capacity of the tank and dome combined. The capacity of the dome shall be measured from the inside top of shell of tank to the inside top of dome or bottom of any vent pipe projecting inside of dome, except that when a pressure relief device is applied to side of dome, the effective capacity of the dome shall be measured from top of the pressure relief device opening inside of dome to inside top of shell of tank.
( c ) The opening in the tank shell within the dome shall be at least 29 inches in diameter. When the opening in the tank shell exceeds 30 inches in diameter, the opening shall be reinforced in an approved manner. This additional reinforcement may be accomplished by the use of a dome opening of the flued-type as shown in appendix E, Figure E 10C of the AAR Specifications for Tank Cars or by the use of reinforcing as outlined in Appendix E, E3.04 and Figures E10K and E10L. When the opening in the tank shell is less than the inside diameter of the dome, and the dome pocket is not closed off in an approved manner, dome pocket drain holes shall be provided in the tank shell with nipples projecting inside the tank at least 1 inch.
( d ) The dome head shall be of approved contour and shall be designed for pressure on concave side.
( e ) Aluminum alloy domes: ( 1 ) The dome shell thickness shall be calculated by the formula in § 179.200-6(a).
( 2 ) The dome head may be an ellipsoid of revolution in which the major axis shall be equal to the diameter of the dome shell and the minor axis shall be one-half the major axis. The thickness in this case shall be determined by using formula in § 179.200-6(a).
( 3 ) The dome head, if dished, must be dished to a radius not exceeding 96 inches. Thickness of dished dome head must be calculated by the formula in § 179.200-6(c).
( 4 ) Tank shell shall be reinforced by the addition of a plate equal to or greater than shell in thickness and the cross sectional area shall exceed metal removed for dome opening, or tank shell shall be reinforced by a seamless saddle plate equal to or greater than shell in thickness and butt welded to tank shell. The reinforcing saddle plate shall be provided with a fluid opening having a vertical flange of the diameter of the dome for butt welding shell of dome to the flange. The reinforcing saddle plate shall extend about the dome a distance measured along shell of tank at least equal to the extension at top of tank. Other approved designs may be used.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21350, Nov. 6, 1971; Amdt. 179-28, 46 FR 49906, Oct. 8, 1981; Amdt. 179-52, 61 FR 28680, June 5, 1996; 66 FR 45186, 45390, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 FR 48571, Aug. 14, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 149 (Friday, August 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 43273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3827]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Date and Time: Friday, August 10, 2007, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

Place: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr., Conference Room on the ninth Floor of 
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: Part of the meeting will be open to the public and part of the 
meeting will be closed.

Matters to be Considered

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes,
    2. Obligation of Funds for a National Contact Center Migration 
Study, and
    3. Obligation of Funds for a Six-Month Extension of the National 
Contact Center Contract.

Closed Session

    Agency Adjudication and Determination on Federal Agency 
Discrimination Compliant Appeals.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, a part of the meeting 
will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations 
and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission 
meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides a 
recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission 
sessions.)
    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) 
at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides 
sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing 
impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made 
by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above. Contact Person for 
More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive Officer on 
(202) 663-4070.


    This notice issued August 1, 2007.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 07-3827 Filed 8-1-07; 1:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: chooin@hotmail.com [mailto:chooin@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Trieu Nguyen 

235 Berry St. #701 

San Francisco, CA 94158
#### Judge of Probate *v.*Mathes *& a.*

In a suit on the bond of an executor who has not settled an account, the want of interest of a person on whose petition the executor has been cited to settle an account is not a defence.

Generally a loan of trust funds to one person without security is negligence, and an executor is liable for a loss caused by such a loan, whether the loss occurred before or after the passage of the act prescribing trustees’ investments.

Debt, on an executor’s bond. Facts found by a referee.

*Wiggin*Fuller, for the plaintiff.

*Smith*and Hatch, for the defendants.

Doe, C. J.

By the will, the testator’s widow (now deceased) had a life estate in all the property, and his children had the remainder. The executor, though cited to settle an account, has never performed that duty. A citation to settle was issued upon the petition of the husband of one of the children. If the petitioner’s want of interest was an objection available for the executor, it should have been raised in the probate court, and is not a defence in this suit.

The estate was appraised at $4,150. In 1873 and 1874, the executor, acting in good faith, loaned $1,200 of the money received by him as executor to one Hall, taking his notes without security. Hall was then regarded as solvent; but he is now insolvent, and the money is lost. There being no peculiar facts taking the case oxrt of the general rule of fact that a loan of trust funds to one person without security is negligence, the executor is liable for the loss. *Knowlton*v. Bradley, 17 N. H. 458; *Clement*v. Clement, 19 N. H. 460, 463; *Kimball*v. Reding, 31 N. H. 352, 375; *Harding*v. Larned, 4 Allen 426 ; *Clark*v. Garfield, 8 Allen 427 ; *Richardson*v. Boynton, 12 Allen 138; 2 Kent Com. 230; Hill Tr. 378. It is not necessary to inquire whether any statute of trustees’ investments is applicable to loans made by an executor in 1873 and 1874. G. L., *c.*185, ss. 10, 11; e. 205, s. 2.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Y.
McGovern, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 29, 2004                     /s/ Michael Y. McGovern
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Michael Y. McGovern
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
Record of Contacts

 Docket Number FAA-2014-0054

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Anthony Wan

(613) 952-4410

12/11/13 No Objections

Bombardier 

Aerospace

Mher Krikorian

(514) 855-5001

X 56298

12/12/13 No Objections 

RAA Scott Foose xx/xx/xx N/A
-----Original Message----- 

From: dcrlong@hotmail.com [mailto:dcrlong@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:22 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah Long 

179 Shamrock Court 

Newbury Park, CA 91320
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 13, 1995 (94), Para 94.42 Memorials]
[Page 1134]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.94.42  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       129. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of Indiana, relative to urging 
     the Congress of the United States to amend the United States 
     Code, to permit full concurrent receipt of military longevity 
     retirement pay and service-connected disability compensation 
     benefits; to the Committee on National Security.
       130. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Maine, 
     relative to memorializing the President and the Congress of 
     the United States to provide support for continued critical 
     access along Maine's Route 1 corridor through replacement of 
     the Carlton Bridge in Bath, ME; to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
       131. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, relative to memorializing the 
     Congress of the United States to study certain matters 
     relating to the European Common Market; to the Committee on 
     Ways and Means.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending November 19, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                       | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|AMES CMNTY BK, AMES, IOWA                    | 269049  | 05/09/2011 | 10/03/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|COMMUNITY BK ELMHURST, ELMHURST, ILLINOIS    | 2044820 | 06/13/2011 | 10/13/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|HURON CMNTY BK, EAST TAWAS, MICHIGAN         | 475345  | 07/05/2011 | 10/27/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|IOWA ST SVG BK, KNOXVILLE, IOWA              | 849647  | 06/20/2011 | 10/28/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|STATE BK OF BLUE MOUND, BLUE MOUND, ILLINOIS | 306739  | 06/06/2011 | 10/10/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: fgiantonio@msn.com [mailto:fgiantonio@msn.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Francis Giantonio 

320 Parmelee Hill Rd 

Durham, CT 06422
Exhibit 10.11

LabOne 2003 Incentive Plan

The Annual Incentive Plan is designed to motivate and reward the accomplishment of targeted operating results.  The Compensation Committee and management establish operating goals under the Plan based upon the judgment of reasonable productivity improvements and targeted earnings per share.  The size of the incentive pool increases pursuant to a formula established by the Committee based on increased earnings per share thresholds.  The incentive pool based on productivity improvements is paid in cash during the year as certain targeted objectives are obtained by non-management personnel.  The incentive pool for designated managers and officers is distributed in cash ratably at year end according to a pre-established weighting.  The weighting is based upon senior management's potential contribution to the Company's financial and strategic goals for the year, and is reviewed and approved by the Committee.