alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1544.223 Transportation of Federal Air Marshals. ( a ) A Federal Air Marshal on duty status may have a weapon accessible while aboard an aircraft for which screening is required.
( b ) Each aircraft operator must carry Federal Air Marshals, in the number and manner specified by TSA, on each scheduled passenger operation, and public charter passenger operation designated by TSA.
( c ) Each Federal Air Marshal must be carried on a first priority basis and without charge while on duty, including positioning and repositioning flights. When a Federal Air Marshal is assigned to a scheduled flight that is canceled for any reason, the aircraft operator must carry that Federal Air Marshal without charge on another flight as designated by TSA.
( d ) Each aircraft operator must assign the specific seat requested by a Federal Air Marshal who is on duty status. If another LEO is assigned to that seat or requests that seat, the aircraft operator must inform the Federal Air Marshal. The Federal Air Marshal will coordinate seat assignments with the other LEO.
( e ) The Federal Air Marshal identifies himself or herself to the aircraft operator by presenting credentials that include a clear, full-face picture, the signature of the Federal Air Marshal, and the signature of the FAA Administrator. A badge, shield, or similar device may not be used or accepted as the sole means of identification.
( f ) The requirements of § 1544.219(a) do not apply for a Federal Air Marshal on duty status.
( g ) Each aircraft operator must restrict any information concerning the presence, seating, names, and purpose of Federal Air Marshals at any station or on any flight to those persons with an operational need to know.
( h ) Law enforcement officers authorized to carry a weapon during a flight will be contacted directly by a Federal Air Marshal who is on that same flight.
§ 172.514 Bulk packagings. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, each person who offers for transportation a bulk packaging which contains a hazardous material, shall affix the placards specified for the material in §§ 172.504 and 172.505.
( b ) Each bulk packaging that is required to be placarded when it contains a hazardous material, must remain placarded when it is emptied, unless it— ( 1 ) Is sufficiently cleaned of residue and purged of vapors to remove any potential hazard;
( 2 ) Is refilled, with a material requiring different placards or no placards, to such an extent that any residue remaining in the packaging is no longer hazardous; or
( 3 ) Contains the residue of a hazardous substance in Class 9 in a quantity less than the reportable quantity, and conforms to § 173.29(b)(1) of this subchapter.
( c ) *Exceptions.* The following packagings may be placarded on only two opposite sides or, alternatively, may be labeled instead of placarded in accordance with subpart E of this part: ( 1 ) A portable tank having a capacity of less than 3,785 L (1,000 gallons). Additionally, portable tanks containing a combustible liquid may be placarded with a combustible placard that meets the label specifications for size in § 172.407(c). However, a transport vehicle containing portable tanks with a reduced-size combustible placard is still required to conform to the placarding requirements in this subpart, including the size requirements in § 172.519(c);
( 2 ) A DOT 106 or 110 multi-unit tank car tank;
( 3 ) A bulk packaging other than a portable tank, cargo tank, flexible bulk container, or tank car (*e.g.,* a bulk bag or box) with a volumetric capacity of less than 18 cubic meters (640 cubic feet);
( 4 ) For an intermediate bulk container (IBC) labeled in accordance with subpart E of this part, the IBC may display the proper shipping name and UN identification number markings in accordance with § 172.301(a)(1) in place of the UN number on an orange panel, placard, or white square-on-point configuration as prescribed in § 172.336(d). Additionally, IBCs containing a combustible liquid may be placarded with a combustible placard that meets the label specifications for size in § 172.407(c). However, a transport vehicle containing IBCs with a reduced-size combustible placard is still required to conform to the placarding requirements in this subpart, including the size requirements in § 172.519(c); and
( 5 ) A Large Packaging as defined in § 171.8 of this subchapter.
( d ) A flexible bulk container may be placarded in two opposing positions.
[Amdt. 172-136, 59 FR 38064, July 26, 1994; Amdt. 172-148, 61 FR 50255, Sept. 25, 1996, as amended by 66 FR 45379, Aug. 28, 2001; 69 FR 64473, Nov. 4, 2004; 75 FR 5392, Feb. 2, 2010; 76 FR 43528, July 20, 2011; 77 FR 60942, Oct. 5, 2012; 81 FR 35540, June 2, 2016; 85 FR 27878, May 11, 2020; 89 FR 15665, Mar. 4, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Estate of Peter G. Fox, *Deceased*.

Decree affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 24, 1995 (72), Para 72.7 Recorded Vote]
[Page 810]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.72.7  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the foregoing amendment submitted by Mr. SMITH of New 
Jersey.

It was decided in the

Yeas

240

affirmative

Nays

181
```
#### § 1584.107 [Reserved]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.27 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1139]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.27  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Ms. HARMAN, for today;
  To Mr. UNDERWOOD, for today and the balance of the week;
  To Mr. TUCKER, for today;
  To Miss COLLINS of Michigan, for today and balance of the week;
  To Mr. CLINGER, for today; and
  To Mr. RUSH, for today.
  And then,
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 121 (Monday, June 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Mendocino Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet July 20, 2007 in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered 
include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Extension of 
RAC (4) Discussion--items of interest (5) Discussion/approval of 
projects, (6) next agenda items and meeting date.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 20, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 12 
noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, 
located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo 
Road, Covelo, CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7958f929593a78194c9818283c99294"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9bba1bcbbbd89afbae7afacade7bcba">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Persons 
who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff by July 10, 2007. Public 
will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting.

    Dated: June 14, 2007.
Jim Ruhl,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 07-3073 Filed 6-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-----Original Message----- 

From: hungertruth@yahoo.com [mailto:hungertruth@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dan Mages 

4640 Sierra St. 

Riverside, CA 92504
#### Tilda Adkisson v. The State.

*No. 650.*

*Decided April 3.*

1. Bigamy—Evidence of Former Marriage—Reputation.—On a trial tor bigamy, had reputation been the only evidence of former marriage, a charge asked by appellant, to the effect that such testimony was not sufficient proof of marriage, should have been given. But this was not the only evidence of that fact, and the charge was properly refused.

2. Same—Evidence of Suit for Divorce Pending.—On a trial for bigamy, the State offered in evidence a petition for divorce filed by appellant, alleging her marriage. *Held,*that this evidence was admissible, and in connection with the testimony of reputation, was sufficient to show her former marriage.

Appeal from the District Court of Robertson. Tried below before Hon. W. G. Taliaferro.

Appellant was convicted of bigamy, and her punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

Ho briefs for appellant have reached the Reporter.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The appellant was convicted under an indictment charging her with bigamy, and her punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary, and from the judgment and sentence of the lower court she prosecutes this appeal.

The appellant insists, that the only evidence in the case showing a former marriage between herself and Tom Adkisson, her alleged former husband, is reputation, and that such evidence is not alone sufficient, and that the court should have given the charge asked by appellant, to the effect, that such testimony is not sufficient proof of

*297marriage. If such had been the state of the case presented by the evidence, it would have unquestionably been the duty of the court to have given the charge asked. See article 328, Code of Criminal Procedure. But several witnesses testify, that defendant and Tom Adkisson lived together a number of years, claiming and treating each other as husband and wife. Besides this, the petition of appellant for a divorce from Tom Adkisson, filed in the District Court of Bobertson County, in which she alleged that she was duly and legally married to said Tom Adkisson, in Pitts County, in the State of North Carolina, was introduced in evidence. This evidence, in connection with the testimony of reputation, in our opinion was amply sufficient to show the intermarriage of defendant and Tom Adkisson; and the charge asked by defendant was not required. The petition for divorce was properly admitted in evidence. Holder v. The State, Dallas Term, 1895, 29 S. W. Rep., 793.

The evidence in the case was not wholly circumstantial, and there was no occasion for the court to give the charge asked by defendant on that subject. The other matters complained of by appellant are not material, and do not require notice. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                           PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Unaudited)
                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     ------------------------------------------------
                                       2003      2002     2001     2000 (a)  1999 (a)
                                     -------   -------   -------   --------  --------
<S>                                 <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>

Earnings:
Income from continuing operations
  before income taxes                $ 9,001   $ 4,677   $   990   $  (528)   $(2,593)
Fixed charges                         15,808     5,782     2,742     1,817        433
                                     -------   -------   -------   -------    -------
                                     $24,809   $10,459   $ 3,732   $ 1,289    $(2,160)
                                     =======   =======   =======   =======    =======

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                     $14,781   $ 5,564   $ 2,660   $ 1,723    $   371
Interest portion of rental expense     1,027       218        82        94         62
                                     -------   -------   -------   -------    -------
                                     $15,808   $ 5,782   $ 2,742   $ 1,817    $   433
                                     =======   =======   =======   =======    =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      1.57      1.81      1.36        --         --
                                     =======   =======   =======   =======    =======

</TABLE>


(a) Our earnings were insufficient to cover our fixed charges by $528 and $2,593
for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
EXHIBIT 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Howard W. Sharp, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSB Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



Date: February 24, 2004



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Howard W. Sharp                  
|    |  | Howard W. Sharp                      
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: wildwestwools@yahoo.com [mailto:wildwestwools@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

joan daniels 

192 grey eagle rd 

stevensville, MT 59870
## 14 CFR §91.7 (a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil

aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no

airworthiness certific ate issued for the aircraft, should this

exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist

for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft

and the requirements contained in the Operating Manual for

maintenance and use of safety checks prior to each flight, as

set forth in the Operating Manual, an equivalent level of

safety will be provided.



## 14 CFR §91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight

Manual in the Aircraft

S ection 91.9 (b) (2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.

- registere d civil aircraft

—

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not

required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in

the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight

Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards,

or any combination thereof.

The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or

place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only

because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no

room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping

the Operating Manual at the ground control point where the

pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to it. The

FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation:

Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565,

9565B, 10167, 10167A 10602, 32827, and 10700
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: : Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Mexico City Miami Milan Monterrey Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com \\DC - 023866/000002 - 6104242 v1 Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com

January 26, 2015 By Electronic Mail Mr. Brett Kruger Acting Division Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Motion of Mesa Airlines, Inc. for Temporary Waiver of Dormancy Condition (DFW-BJX/QRO) – Dockets DOT-OST-2011-0076 and DOT-OST-2014-0179 Dear Mr. Kruger: We have polled the U.S. air carrier representatives served with the above-referenced motion, filed on January 22, 2015, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought therein. Sincerely,

Patrick Rizzi Hogan Lovells US LLP cc: dheffernan@cozen.com ; Jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com ; howard.kass@aa.com ; robert.wirick@aa.com ; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com ; chris.walker@delta.com ; matwood@cozen.com ; stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com ; jhill@cooley.com ; perkmann@cooley.com ; bob.kneisley@wnco.com ; leslie.abbott@wnco.com ; dkirstein@yklaw.com ; jyoung@yklaw.com ; thomas.ting@suncountry.com ; dan.weiss@united.com ; steve.morrissey@united.com ; barbara.russell@virginamerica.com ; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; brett.kruger@dot.gov; englets@state.gov; info@airlineinfo.com
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 51180          Scale: 150,000          Edition: 5          Edition Date: 12-DEC-98          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1999/25**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 

AMERICAN EXPRESS RETIREMENT RESTORATION PLAN 

WHEREAS, pursuant to its delegation powers, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “CBC”) of the
Board of Directors of American Express Company (the “Company”) has authorized the Senior Vice President Global Compensation & Benefits of the Company generally to take certain actions with respect to the American Express Retirement
Restoration (the “Plan”) as he shall deem reasonably necessary or appropriate; and 
 WHEREAS,
the undersigned Senior Vice President Global Compensation & Benefits deems it reasonably necessary and appropriate to amend the American Express Retirement Restoration Plan (the “Plan”) in order to permit the Company to make lump sum
payments of certain de minimis amounts; and 
 THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective
immediately as set forth below: 
 A new Section 8.9 is added to and made a part of the Plan to read as follows: 

Section 8.9 De Minimis Lump Sum Payment. Notwithstanding the other provisions of the Plan, the
Administrator may, in its sole discretion, make a mandatory lump sum pay-out of a Participant’s Account at any time, provided that such pay-out amount shall be in an amount equal to the lump sum value of such Account determined for the date of
such pay-out; and further provided that such pay-out (1) accompanies the termination and liquidation of the Participant’s entire interest under the Plan and all similar arrangements that constitute an account balance plan under Section
1.409A-1(c)(2) of the Treasury Regulations; and (2) the payment is not greater than the applicable dollar amount under Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code. 

 

					
	 Dated: September 26, 2013
	 	 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY

			
		 	 By:
	 	 /s/ David Kasiarz

		 	 Its:
	 	 SVP, Global Compensation & Benefits