alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012089EN.01001801.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/18

---

Action brought on 2 February 2012 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-55/12)

2012/C 89/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, W. Mölls, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that by granting excise duty relief for the fuel used by disabled people for motor vehicles without respecting the minimum levels of taxation prescribed by Council Directive 2003/96/EC (1) Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by granting excise duty relief for the fuel used by disabled people for motor vehicles without respecting the minimum levels of taxation prescribed by Council Directive 2003/96/EC (1) Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive;

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that, by maintaining the exemption from excise duty of motor fuels used by disabled people, Ireland is in breach of its obligations under the directive.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity

1

OJ L 283, p. 51

---
|Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







     In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Centennial Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Neal T. McLaughlin,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)        The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Neal T. McLaughlin
Neal T. McLaughlin
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer;
Chief Accounting Officer
August 9, 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.0 Scope.

This part prescribes safety standards and reporting requirements for pipeline facilities used in the transportation of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide.

[Amdt. 195-45, 56 FR 26925, June 12, 1991]
#### Hazen *v.*Quimby.

Justice may require the substitution of a new party for the original plaintiff, by an amendment of the writ and declaration.

Foreign Attachment. The defendant was defaulted, and a •claimant of the fund in the hands of the trustee appeared. The plaintiff and the defendant agreed in writing that the writ should be amended by striking out the name of the plaintiff and inserting in place thereof the name of another person. The court allowed the amendment, and the trustee and claimant excepted.

*W. H. Duncan*and *C. A.*Dole, for the trustee.

*W. JET-*Duncan, for the claimant.

*J. L.*Spring, for the plaintiff.

Doe, C. J.

Justice may require the amendment. *Judge of Probate*v. Jackson, 58 N. H. 458; *Folsom*v. *Insurance Co.,*59 N. H. 54; *Prescott*v. *Farmer,*59 N. H. 90; *Buckminster*v. *Wright,*59 N. H. 153; *Boudreau*v. *Eastman,*59 N. H. 467; *Chauncy*v. *Insurance Co.,*60 N. H. 428. The case presents no question of law.

*Exception overruled.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 18, 2020 No. 04-20-00107-CV Douglas HEDRICK

and Mark Hedrick, Appellants
v. JBRF, LLC ; Lonestar Handguns, LLC, and Joshua Felker, August C. Golla, and Debra S. Golla, Appellees From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-00267 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellants’ reply brief is due on December 22, 2020. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6(c). Before the due date, Appellants filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief. Appellants’ motion is GRANTED. Appellants’ reply brief is due on January 11, 2021. See id. R. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of December, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
98-2257.

#### State v. Sherrills.

Cuyahoga App. No. 60622. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1471, 704 N.E.2d 579. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
-----Original Message----- 

From: lamckown@bellsouth.net [mailto:lamckown@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Louise McKown 

102 Emory Lane 

Oak Ridge, TN 37830
-----Original Message----- 

From: roxannepark@hotmail.com [mailto:roxannepark@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Facer 

3655 Dursum Ave NE 

Ada, MI 49301
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.713 Approval modification, suspension or termination. ( a ) The Associate Administrator may modify an approval on finding that— ( 1 ) Modification is necessary to conform an existing approval to relevant statutes and regulations as they may be amended from time to time; or
( 2 ) Modification is required by changed circumstances to enable the approval to continue to meet the standards of § 107.709(d).
( b ) The Associate Administrator may modify, suspend or terminate an approval, as appropriate, on finding that— ( 1 ) Because of a change in circumstances, the approval no longer is needed or no longer would be granted if applied for;
( 2 ) The application contained inaccurate or incomplete information, and the approval would not have been granted had the application been accurate and complete;
( 3 ) The application contained deliberately inaccurate or incomplete information; or
( 4 ) The holder knowingly has violated the terms of the approval or an applicable requirement of this chapter in a manner demonstrating lack of fitness to conduct the activity for which the approval is required.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, before an approval is modified, suspended or terminated, the Associate Administrator notifies the holder in writing of the proposed action and the reasons for it, and provides an opportunity to show cause why the proposed action should not be taken. ( 1 ) The holder may file a written response with the Associate Administrator within 30 days of receipt of notice of the proposed action.
( 2 ) After considering the holder's or party's written response, or after 30 days have passed without response since receipt of the notice, the Associate Administrator notifies the holder in writing of the final decision with a brief statement of reasons.
( d ) The Associate Administrator, if necessary to avoid a risk of significant harm to persons or property, may in the notification declare the proposed action immediately effective.
#### Mary O’Hara and another, *Appellants, v.*William H. Dudley and another, *Respondents*

Judgment affirmed, costs of appeal of both parties to be paid out of the fund. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
#### § 1152.35 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
GROUP INCORPORATED QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 3,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                  4,682
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          16,994
<ALLOWANCES>                              551
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       34,005
<PP&E>                                 15,511
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         92,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   9,731
<BONDS>                                 1,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   13
<OTHER-SE>                             78,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           92,174
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       53,344
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          39,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         4,907
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,731
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.02
        

</TABLE>
10.3 - Third Amendment to Employment and Consulting Agreement




EXHIBIT 10.3
CDI CORPORATION
Third Amendment to Employment and Consulting Agreement
This is the Third Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into as of February 15, 2009, and previously amended effective December 16, 2010 and December 31, 2012, between CDI Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and Robert J. Giorgio (the “Executive”).
In consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
		
	1.
	The term of Executive’s employment shall be extended from July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013 (together with the initial extension from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013, the “Extension Period”).




		
	2.
	In the event of Executive’s Retirement (as defined in the Time Vested Deferred Stock Agreement dated September 29, 2011 (the “September 2011 Award”)) following the Extension Period, all the remaining unvested shares in the September 2011 Award shall vest upon Retirement.




		
	3.
	All other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties have executed this Amendment on September 19, 2013, to be effective as of July 1, 2013.
                                    






                
                                               
       


	
				
	Company:
	 
	 
	Executive:

	CDI CORPORATION
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:  /s/ Paulett Eberhart
	 
	 
	/s/ Robert J. Giorgio

	Paulett Eberhart
	 
	 
	Robert J. Giorgio

	President & Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 12, 2024

No. 04-23-00387-CR

EX PARTE Pedro BECERRA SANCHEZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10494CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Pedro Becerra Sanchez’s 

appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. 

We further consider Becerra Sanchez’s appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and DENY his 

request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 12, 2024.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of June, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1823

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to direct the 
    Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment of repayment 
    contracts between the United States and the Central Utah Water 
 Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and November 26, 1985, 
                        and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1823

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to direct the 
    Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment of repayment 
    contracts between the United States and the Central Utah Water 
 Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and November 26, 1985, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED 
              STATES AND THE CENTRAL UTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.

    Section 210 of the Central Utah Project Completion Act (106 Stat. 
4624) is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the 
following: ``The Secretary shall allow for prepayment of the repayment 
contract between the United States and the Central Utah Water 
Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and supplemented on 
November 26, 1985, providing for repayment of municipal and industrial 
water delivery facilities for which repayment is provided pursuant to 
such contract, under terms and conditions similar to those contained in 
the supplemental contract that provided for the prepayment of the 
Jordan Aqueduct dated October 28, 1993. The prepayment may be provided 
in several installments to reflect substantial completion of the 
delivery facilities being prepaid and may not be adjusted on the basis 
of the type of prepayment financing utilized by the District. The 
District shall exercise its right to prepayment pursuant to this 
section by the end of fiscal year 2002. Nothing in this section 
authorizes or terminates the authority to use tax exempt bond financing 
for this prepayment.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
From: mcandjorge@cox.net [mailto:mcandjorge@cox.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:35 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mary-Carol Wagner 

8518 E. Fairmount Pl. 

Tucson, AZ 85715
From: kay.forbes-smith@kfspower.com [mailto:kay.forbessmith@kfspower.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kay Forbes-Smith 

3019 Fawn Hill Dr. 

Evansville, IN 47711
§ 179.201-10 Water capacity marking. ( a ) Water capacity of the tank in pounds stamped plainly and permanently in letters and figures at least 3 ⁄ 8 inch high into the metal of the tank immediately below the stamped marks specified in § 179.200-24(a). This mark shall also be stenciled on the jacket immediately below the dome platform and directly behind or within 3 feet of the right or left side of the ladder, or ladders, if there is a ladder on each side of the tank, in letters and figures at least 11 ⁄ 2 inches high as follows: water capacity 000000 Pounds
( b ) After July 25, 2012, authorized DOT non-pressure tank cars that comply with this section and are equipped with stainless steel identification plates may have the water capacity of the tank in pounds prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (a) of this section stamped plainly and permanently on their identification plate in conformance with the applicable marking requirements prescribed in § 179.24(a) instead of into the metal of the tank or immediately below the stamped marks specified in § 179.200-24(a).
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967. Amended at 77 FR 37985, June 25, 2012]
§ 172.312 Liquid hazardous materials in non-bulk packagings. ( a ) Except as provided in this section, each non-bulk combination package having inner packagings containing liquid hazardous materials, single packaging fitted with vents, or open cryogenic receptacle intended for the transport of refrigerated liquefied gases must be: ( 1 ) Packed with closures upward, and
( 2 ) Legibly marked with package orientation markings that are similar to the illustration shown in this paragraph, on two opposite vertical sides of the package with the arrows pointing in the correct upright direction. The arrows must be either black or red on white or other suitable contrasting background and commensurate with the size of the package. Depicting a rectangular border around the arrows is optional.
( b ) Arrows for purposes other than indicating proper package orientation may not be displayed on a package containing a liquid hazardous material.
( c ) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to— ( 1 ) A non-bulk package with inner packagings which are cylinders.
( 2 ) Except when offered or intended for transportation by aircraft, packages containing flammable liquids in inner packagings of 1 L or less prepared in accordance with § 173.150 (b) or (c) of this subchapter.
( 3 ) When offered or intended for transportation by aircraft, packages containing liquid hazardous materials in inner packagings of 120 mL (4 fluid oz.) or less when packed with sufficient absorption material between the inner and outer packagings to completely absorb the liquid contents.
( 4 ) Liquids contained in manufactured articles (e.g., alcohol or mercury in thermometers) which are leak-tight in all orientations.
( 5 ) A non-bulk package with hermetically sealed inner packagings not exceeding 500 mL each.
( 6 ) Packages containing liquid infectious substances in primary receptacles not exceeding 50 mL (1.7 oz.).
( 7 ) Class 7 radioactive material in Type A, IP-2, IP-3, Type B(U), or Type B(M) packages.
[Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52591, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66254, Dec. 20, 1991; 57 FR 45458, Oct. 1, 1992; 64 FR 51918, Sept. 27, 1999; 66 FR 45379, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 FR 45030, July 31, 2003; 71 FR 54395, Sept. 14, 2006; 71 FR 78627, Dec. 29, 2006; 76 FR 3365, Jan. 19, 2011; 78 FR 1073, Jan. 7, 2013]
çOS74r £LPRO UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION
IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105.3901 FEB 06 2014OFFICEOFTHEREGIONALADMINISTRATOR The Honorable Herman
G. Honanie Chairman
of the Hopi Tribe P.O. Box 123 Kykotsrnovi, Arizona 86039 Dear Chairman Honanie: Thank youfor yourletter dated January 31, 2014, regarding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposed rulemaking
for the Navajo Generating Station (NGS). In your letter, you describe the current status of your request for information from the Department

of the Interior and request that EPA continue
to accept comments from the Hopi Tribe until April 17, 2014. Representatives from the Department
of the Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation have expressed support
toEPA for yourextension request. In aletter dated December
16, 2013, you requested documents from EPA, including air pollutant emissions data and air permits issued to NGS. By letter dated January

7, 2014, EPA provided

to youthe documents responsive

to your request. As discussed

in that letter, EPA was exercising
its discretion

to accept late comments from affected Tribes until February

5, 2014. The Hopi Tribe
is the only Tribe that has requested additional time beyond this date. EPA will continue

toexercise
its discretion and will accept late comments from the 1-lopi Tribe until March 21, 2014. If youhave additional questions

or concerns, please contact meat (415) 972-8702. Any questions you mayhave related
tothe information
we provided

to youon January

7, 2014 maybe directed
toMs. Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division,

at (520) 498-0118,

orMs. Anita Lee, of the Air Planning Office,
at (415) 972-3958. cc:Alletta Belin, U.S. Department

of the Interior David Palumbo, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Sincerely, BlumenfeldPrintedonRecycledPaper