alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.506 Transmission lines: Spike hydrostatic pressure test. ( a ) *Spike test requirements.* Whenever a segment of steel transmission pipeline that is operated at a hoop stress level of 30 percent or more of SMYS is spike tested under this part, the spike hydrostatic pressure test must be conducted in accordance with this section. ( 1 ) The test must use water as the test medium.
( 2 ) The baseline test pressure must be as specified in the applicable paragraphs of § 192.619(a)(2) or § 192.620(a)(2), whichever applies.
( 3 ) The test must be conducted by maintaining a pressure at or above the baseline test pressure for at least 8 hours as specified in § 192.505.
( 4 ) After the test pressure stabilizes at the baseline pressure and within the first 2 hours of the 8-hour test interval, the hydrostatic pressure must be raised (spiked) to a minimum of the lesser of 1.5 times MAOP or 100% SMYS. This spike hydrostatic pressure test must be held for at least 15 minutes after the spike test pressure stabilizes.
( b ) *Other technology or other technical evaluation process.* Operators may use other technology or another process supported by a documented engineering analysis for establishing a spike hydrostatic pressure test or equivalent. Operators must notify PHMSA 90 days in advance of the assessment or reassessment requirements of this subchapter. The notification must be made in accordance with § 192.18 and must include the following information: ( 1 ) Descriptions of the technology or technologies to be used for all tests, examinations, and assessments;
( 2 ) Procedures and processes to conduct tests, examinations, assessments, perform evaluations, analyze defects, and remediate defects discovered;
( 3 ) Data requirements, including original design, maintenance and operating history, anomaly or flaw characterization;
( 4 ) Assessment techniques and acceptance criteria;
( 5 ) Remediation methods for assessment findings;
( 6 ) Spike hydrostatic pressure test monitoring and acceptance procedures, if used;
( 7 ) Procedures for remaining crack growth analysis and pipeline segment life analysis for the time interval for additional assessments, as required; and
( 8 ) Evidence of a review of all procedures and assessments by a qualified technical subject matter expert.
[Amdt. 192-125, 84 FR 52245, Oct. 1, 2019]
98-497.

#### State v. Pilgrim.

Pickaway App. Nos. 97CA2 and 97CA4. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On March 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice of a motion to certify a conflict pending in the Court of Appeals for Pickaway County. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal until the court of appeals determined whether to certify a conflict. Whereas a copy of a court of appeals’ order certifying a conflict has not been filed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(1), and the appellant has not filed a notice that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this order why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III.
From: organicstyle@earthlink.net [mailto:organicstyle@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Olson 

2250 A Street 

San Diego, CA 92102
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: July 8, 2010



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                           
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.                         
|Chief Executive Officer;
Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2078 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2078

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the excise tax 
                       treatment of draft cider.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1995

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, 
Mr. Houghton, and Mr. Dooley) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the excise tax 
                       treatment of draft cider.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF DRAFT CIDER.

    (a) Draft Cider Containing Not More Than 7 Percent Alcohol Taxed as 
Wine.--Subsection (b) of section 5041 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to imposition and rate of tax) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) On draft cider derived primarily from apples or apple 
        concentrate and water, containing no other fruit product, and 
        containing at least one-half of 1 percent and not more than 7 
        percent of alcohol by volume, 22.6 cents per wine gallon.''
    (b) Excluded From Small Producer Credit.--Paragraph (1) of section 
5041(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for 
small domestic producers) is amended by striking ``subsection (b)(4)'' 
and inserting ``paragraphs (4) and (6) of subsection (b)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply on and after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 109.5 Opening of packages. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b): ( 1 ) Stop movement of the package in transportation and gather information from any person to learn the nature and contents of the package;
( 2 ) Open any overpack, outer packaging, or other component of the package that is not immediately adjacent to the hazardous materials contained in the package and examine the inner packaging(s) or packaging components.
( b ) *Perishable hazardous material.* To ensure the expeditious transportation of a package containing a perishable hazardous material, an agent will utilize appropriate alternatives before exercising an authority under paragraph (a) of this section.
[76 FR 11592, Mar. 2, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 60763, Oct. 2, 2013]
**MEMORANDUM OFUNDERSTANDING**

            This Memorandum of Understanding is entered intothis the 29 day of April, 2005, among WAYMON L. HICKMAN ("Hickman"),FIRST FARMERS & MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK ("Bank"), and FIRSTFARMERS & MERCHANTS CORPORATION ("Corporation").  

            WHERAS, Hickman, having reached the mandatoryretirement age of seventy from the Bank and Corporation Board of Directors,would continue to work serving as an "Ambassador" in the six countiesserved by the Bank.  

            WHERAS, Hickman would continue to serve on theExecutive Committee as the Honorary Chairman, with Executive Committee fees tobe paid, and Honorary Board Member for life, maintain the title of SeniorChairman of the Board and serve on other Bank related committees as assigned bythe Board of Directors. Hickman would serve on various civic, professional andcharitable positions as he chooses.  

            Hickman would work part-time for which he wouldreceive:  

(B) Certainbenefits that he now receives, including but not limited to Graymere CountryClub dues,                             Kiwanis, Tennessee Bankers Association and other bank related expenses and use of bankautomobile;            

(C) Participation in the Senior ExecutiveOfficers' Bonus Plan on the same basis as other senior officers, with base salary as established on January 1, 2002, which is $264,600.00,to be calculated through December 31, 2005; and

(D)  Hickman would maintain an office of hischoice on the third floor equivalent to the office of Virgil H. Moore,Jr. 

            Hickman's agreement with the Bank andCorporation will terminate April 30, 2008, unless terminated earlier by eitherparty, with any changes in this Memorandum to be agreed upon by both parties.  

/s/ Waymon L.  Hickman

WAYMON L. HICKMAN

/s/ H. Terry Cook  Jr.

H. TERRY COOK, JR,  CHAIRMAN

COMPENSATION  COMMITTEE 

FIRST FARMERS &  MERCHANTS

NATIONAL BANK

FIRST FARMERS &  MERCHANTS 

NATIONAL BANK

By:  /s/ T. Randy  Stevens

Its:  Chief  Executive Officer

 

 

FIRST FARMERS &  MERCHANTS

CORPORATION

By:  /s/ T. Randy  Stevens

Its:  Chief  Executive Officer

 

 

/s/ Martha M. McKennon

SECRETARY
248 P.2d 1063

#### SELLARS v. SELLARS.

No. 7815.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Oct. 7. 1952.

*164Anderson & Anderson, Pocatello, for appellant.

Jones, Pomeroy & Jones, Pocatello, for respondent.

GIVENS, Chief Justice.

Appellant sued respondent, her husband, for separate maintenance, alleging his refusal to support her, abandonment, and physical mistreatment.

Respondent denied her accusations and cross-complained for divorce on the grounds of her making false accusations of immoral relations with other women and infection with a venereal disease — all causing him mental suffering.

The appeal herein is from the decree granting respondent a divorce, and all appellant’s assignments of error center in the contention the evidence is insufficient to support the findings.

The trial judge is the arbiter of conflicting evidence and his determination of *165the weight, credibility, inferences and implications thereof is not to be supplanted by this Court’s impressions or conclusions from the written record. Piatt v. Piatt, 32 Idaho 407, 184 P. 470; Cox v. Cox, 45 Idaho 49, 260 P. 693; Clark v. Clark, 58 Idaho 37, 69 P.2d 980; Hiltbrand v. Hiltbrand, 68 Idaho 275,193 P.2d 391.

Appellant urges that accusations of the kind made here, though false, nevertheless if based upon probable cause, would not constitute cruelty. The trial court saw and heard the witnesses and could thus better determine whether there was probable cause and whether the charges were false or baseless, and also determine the effect of the charges on respondent’s health.

There was substantial evidence to which the trial court could give credence that there was no reasonable justification or, indeed, any justification for the accusations and that they were false and that respondent’s health was injuriously affected thereby.

Conceding that other conclusions could have been drawn, the evidence is sufficient to support his findings and conclusion drawn therefrom, and it would serve no useful purpose to go into the details of the evidence pro or con.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

PORTER, TAYLOR, THOMAS, and KEETON, JJ., concur.
# COUNTY CLERK,HARRISCOUNTY, TEXAS COUNTY

CIVILCOURTSDEPARTMENT April 13,2015 CourtofAppeals 

# 301Fannin

Texas 77002 

# SUBJ: N0n—Payment

of C1erk’s REF: No. 14-15-00214-CV /TrialCourtNo. 1042867 County Civil Court atLaw No. One (1) 

# ROBIN KAY WILSON

VS. OAK OF WOODFOREST III LTD This letteris to you appellant, Robin Wilson, has notpaid forthe OriginalC1erk’sRecord in the above referenced case. The appellant’s attorney was notified by mailed ofthe cost for the Record on March 2015. As ofApril 2015, no fees have been posted forthis Record. If I can be of any further assistance contact me at The original letter will be electronically with the Fourteenth CourtofAppealsonApril 2015.

Stan Stanart 

# County Clerk /S/Joshua Alegria JoshuaAlegria 

# DeputyClerk_

Box 1525 Houston, TX77251-1525 (713) 755-6421 

# H-01-306 (Rev. 08/15/2011) 1 

# 1on 4/1/2015 2:16:39 PM 

### OFFICE OF STAN STANART COUNTY CLERK, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

CIVIL COURTS DEPARTMENT

COST LETTER 1, 2015 David Sadegh 10203 Birchridge Drive, Suite 210 Humble, Texas 77338 RE: DOCKET NO. 1042867, COUNTY COURT AT LAW One (1) KAY 

### vs. 

## OAK OF WOODFOREST III LTD Dear David Sadegh,

In accordance to TRAP 35.3(a), I am notifying you that is for the ofthe Clerk’s Record from the Notice of Appeal that was on March 11, 2015 and the s Request to the Clerk for Preparation ofthe Clerk’s Record, and of Additional Items that was on March 27, 2015. Please remit payment in the of cash, cashier check, credit card, or money order (personal checks will not be payable to STAN STANART, County Clerk. If you have any questions about the Record contact me at (713) 755-9425. Sincerely, STAN STANART, County Clerk

Alegria Deputy Clerk1>.0.

1525 I TX 7725171525 I (713)

Form (Rev. 04/29/2011) 1 of 2 

# 2Filed on 4/1/2015 2:16:39 PM

1525 I TX I (713) No. (Rev. 04/29/2011) 2 of 2 

# 3
Exhibit 32.2



EXHIBIT 32.2

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James A. McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James A. McNulty                                    
|James A. McNulty Chief Financial Officer August 19, 2003
This page is no longer being maintained. You can find a previous version at: /medline/medline_new_titles.html.
        - There is no guarentee that this redirect page will be maintained.
        - You will be redirected in 10 seconds.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41597

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL ALONSO FLORES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:06-CR-506-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael Alonso Flores

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Flores has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
No. 06-41597

2

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Order entered September 8 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00847 - CV WILLIAM BRUCE SHERRI LL, D.D.S. AND SHAW & SHE R RILL , D.D.S., Appellant s V. BUFFIE G. WILLIAMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial D istrict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 10538 

### O RDER W e GRANT appellants’ September 3, 2014 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than October 6, 2014

. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Marvin W. Phillips, *Respondent, v.*Stiles B. Ellsworth *et al., Appellants*.

Judgment and order affirmed. Haight, J., not sitting.
1

ATTACHMENT B

DfE Formulator Program: Product Information Form

OMB Control No. 2070-0178

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 25.5 hours per 

response for formulators of cleaning and non-cleaning products and 9.5 hours per response for partners wishing to add third-party 

partners and products, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering information, and completing and reviewing the 

application. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any

suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the

Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 

Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed application to 

this address.
OMB Control No. 2070-0178

Approval expires XX/XX/XX 

2
OMB Control No. 2070-0178

Approval expires XX/XX/XX 

3
OMB Control No. 2070-0178

Approval expires XX/XX/XX 

4
OMB Control No. 2070-0178

Approval expires XX/XX/XX 

5
#### Jacob H. Gebhard and others, *Commissioners, etc., Respondents, v.*John Scott and another, *Appellants.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
Exhibit 23











        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
  registration statements of Integra Financial Corporation and
  subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No.'s 33-20844, 33-57232, 33-
  88820 and 33-88822) and S-3 (File 33-20844) of our report
  dated January 17, 1996, on our audit of the consolidated
  financial statements of Integra Financial Corporation and
  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for the
  years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which is
  incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on the Form
  10-K.




  /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  January 26, 1996<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.1015 What must a small LPG operator do to implement this subpart? ( a ) *General.* No later than August 2, 2011, a small LPG operator must develop and implement an IM program that includes a written IM plan as specified in paragraph (b) of this section. The IM program for these pipelines should reflect the relative simplicity of these types of pipelines.
( b ) *Elements.* A written integrity management plan must address, at a minimum, the following elements: ( 1 ) *Knowledge.* The operator must demonstrate knowledge of its pipeline, which, to the extent known, should include the approximate location and material of its pipeline. The operator must identify additional information needed and provide a plan for gaining knowledge over time through normal activities conducted on the pipeline (for example, design, construction, operations or maintenance activities).
( 2 ) *Identify threats.* The operator must consider, at minimum, the following categories of threats (existing and potential): Corrosion (including atmospheric corrosion), natural forces, excavation damage, other outside force damage, material or weld failure, equipment failure, and incorrect operation.
( 3 ) *Rank risks.* The operator must evaluate the risks to its pipeline and estimate the relative importance of each identified threat.
( 4 ) *Identify and implement measures to mitigate risks.* The operator must determine and implement measures designed to reduce the risks from failure of its pipeline.
( 5 ) *Measure performance, monitor results, and evaluate effectiveness.* The operator must monitor, as a performance measure, the number of leaks eliminated or repaired on its pipeline and their causes.
( 6 ) *Periodic evaluation and improvement.* The operator must determine the appropriate period for conducting IM program evaluations based on the complexity of its pipeline and changes in factors affecting the risk of failure. An operator must re-evaluate its entire program at least every 5 years. The operator must consider the results of the performance monitoring in these evaluations.
( c ) *Records.* The operator must maintain, for a period of at least 10 years, the following records: ( 1 ) A written IM plan in accordance with this section, including superseded IM plans;
( 2 ) Documents supporting threat identification; and
( 3 ) Documents showing the location and material of all piping and appurtenances that are installed after the effective date of the operator's IM program and, to the extent known, the location and material of all pipe and appurtenances that were existing on the effective date of the operator's program.
[74 FR 63934, Dec. 4, 2009, as amended at 86 FR 2242, Jan. 11, 2021]
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Warren Bancorp, Inc.

We consent of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Nos. 33-27899 and 33-71240) on Form S-8 of our report dated January 23, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Warren Bancorp, Inc. and 
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for 
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1996, which
appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Warren
Bancorp, Inc.



                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Boston Massachusetts
March 20, 1997







                                       78