alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6836

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRUCE LAMONT GOODWIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6)

Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Lamont Goodwin, Appellant Pro Se. Winston David Holliday, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lamont Goodwin appeals the district court’s text 

order denying his post-judgment motion to reduce his sentence. 

We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United 

States v. Goodwin, No. 5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 67.141 Application procedure; all cases. The owner of a vessel applying for an initial Certificate of Documentation, exchange or replacement of a Certificate of Documentation, or return of a vessel to documentation after deletion from documentation must: ( a ) Submit the following to the National Vessel Documentation Center: ( 1 ) Application for Initial Issue, Exchange, or Replacement of Certificate of Documentation; or Redocumentation (form CG-1258);
( 2 ) Title evidence, if applicable;
( 3 ) Mortgagee consent on form CG-4593, if applicable; and
( 4 ) If the application is for replacement of a mutilated document or exchange of documentation, the outstanding Certificate of Documentation.
( b ) Each vessel 100 feet and greater in length applying for a fishery endorsement must meet the requirements of 46 CFR part 356 and must submit materials required in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Upon receipt of the Certificate of Documentation and prior to operation of the vessel, ensure that the vessel is marked in accordance with the requirements set forth in subpart I of this part.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31604, June 15, 1995; USCG-1999-6095, 65 FR 76576, Dec. 7, 2000; USCG-2016-0531, 82 FR 43864, Sept. 20, 2017]
NO. 07-08-0333-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

SEPTEMBER 24, 2008

______________________________

IN RE BOBBY LEWAYNE THOMAS, RELATOR

_________________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Bobby Lewayne Thomas, filed his Application for Writ of Mandamus on

August 14, 2008, contending that the trial court failed to rule on his Motion for Requested

Documents. However, Thomas did not include in the appendix to his application a

“certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the

matter complained of.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j)(A). Therefore, it is unknown whether the

trial court was aware of Thomas’s request. Additionally, Thomas did not pay the filing fee

required under Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. By letter from this Court

dated August 18, 2008, we advised Thomas that the “filing fee in the amount of $125.00

did not accompany the captioned original proceeding. Unless the filing fee is paid by
2

Thursday, August 28, 2008, this proceeding will be subject to dismissal.” TEX. R. APP. P.

5. Thomas has not paid the fee as directed nor has he filed an affidavit of indigence. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. 

Accordingly, we deny Thomas’s petition. See In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225

(Tex.App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding).

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2005

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical

corrections in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2005 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior

3 shall, before the end of the 30-day period beginning on

4 the date of the enactment of this Act, make such correc5 tions to the map described in subsection (b) as are nec6 essary—

7 (1) to move on that map the eastern boundary

8 of the excluded area covering Ocean Beach, Seaview,

9 Ocean Bay Park, and part of Point O’Woods to the

10 western boundary of the Sunken Forest Preserve;

11 and

12 (2) to ensure that on that map the depiction of

13 areas as ‘‘otherwise protected areas’’ does not in14 clude any area that is owned by the Point O’Woods

15 Association (a privately held corporation under the

16 laws of the State of New York).

17 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this

18 subsection is the map that is included in a set of maps

19 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated Octo20 ber 24, 1990, that relates to the unit of the Coastal Bar21 rier Resources System entitled Fire Island Unit NY–59P.

Passed the House of Representatives October 30,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 2011** 

**- NM** 
**- 246** 

**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending May 26, 2012

----

Bank Holding Companies            Morgan Stanley, New York, New York -- to acquire additional shares of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC from Citigroup Inc., New York.            -Approved, May 24, 2012            Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Report of Changes in Organizational Structure (FR Y-10), Annual Report of Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-6), and Annual Report of Foreign Banking Organizations (FR Y-7) and to extend without revision the Supplement to the Report of Changes in Organizational Structure (FR Y-10E).            -Proposed, May 25, 2012            Regulations and Policies            Regulation OO (Supervised Securities Holding Company Registration) -- final rule outlining the procedures for securities holding companies to elect to be supervised by the Federal Reserve, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, May 25, 2012            Enforcement            Enforcement Actions -- action plans for supervised financial institutions to correct deficiencies in residential mortgage loan servicing and foreclosure processing, as required by formal enforcement actions issued by the Federal Reserve last year.            -Announced, May 24, 2012                        Guaranty Bancorp, Denver, Colorado, and Guaranty Bank and Trust Company -- written agreement dated January 22, 2010, terminated May 16, 2012.            -Announced, May 22, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

         Each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Superconductive
Components, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Daniel
Rooney and Curtis A. Loveland as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
or any of them individually with power to act without the other, as his or her
true and lawful attorney-in-fact, in his or her name and on his or her behalf,
and in any and all capacities stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and any and all amendments
thereto, hereby granting unto said attorneys, and to each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in
any and all such capacities, every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done
in and about the premises as fully as each of the undersigned could or might do
in person, hereby granting to each such attorney full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or his substitute
may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 25, 2002.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                  Signature                                                     Title


<S>                                                  <C>
/s/ Daniel Rooney
--------------------------------------------         President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Daniel Rooney                                        (principal executive officer)


/s/ Gerald S. Blaskie
--------------------------------------------         Chief Financial Officer
Gerald S.  Blaskie                                   (principal financial officer and principal
                                                     accounting officer)

/s/ Edward R. Funk
--------------------------------------------         Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer
Edward R. Funk


/s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr.
--------------------------------------------         Director
Robert J. Baker, Jr.


/s/ Edward W. Ungar
--------------------------------------------         Director
Edward W. Ungar

</TABLE>
IB

Union Calendar No. 199

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1533

[Report No. 104–392]

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for escaping

from a Federal prison.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 1995

Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SMITH of Texas,

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. WICKER, Mr. INGLIS

of South Carolina, Mr. CANADY of Florida, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. BARR of

Georgia, and Mrs. CHENOWETH) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

DECEMBER 11, 1995

Additional sponsors: Mr. BUYER, Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr.

GEKAS, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. HANCOCK,

Mr. HILLEARY, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. WAMP, Mr. BONO, Mr.

CALVERT, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. DELAY, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. BEREUTER,

Mr. CHABOT, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. SOUDER, Mr.

SOLOMON, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. MARTINI, Mr. UPTON, Mr. CHRISTENSEN,

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. NEY, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr.

GRAHAM, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. CHRYSLER, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. COOLEY, Mr.

WELLER, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr. DAVIS, Mr. DORNAN,

Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. LUTHER, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SHADEGG, and

Mr. SCHUMER

December 11, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed
2

•HR 1533 RH

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the

penalty for escaping from a Federal prison.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 751(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘10’’.

Union Calendar No. 199

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1533

[Report No. 104–392]

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase

the penalty for escaping from a Federal prison.

DECEMBER 11, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    82425
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1905
<INVENTORY>                                     141310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                236780
<PP&E>                                          613301
<DEPRECIATION>                                  118147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  805266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           121327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                      266596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    805266
<SALES>                                         710971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                710971
<CGS>                                           638413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   638413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  16196
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12434
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Statistical and Data Coordinating Center for Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases.                    

*Date:*                         August 22, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To Review and Evaluate Contract Proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lynn Rust, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-3938,                         *lr228v@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: July 24, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3730 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Docket	No.	FAA-2015-1418

Petitioner	– Jackie	E.	Watson

Page	1	of	2

To:	Dan	Ngo

FAA	Office	of	Rulemaking

From:	Mr.	Jackie	E.	Watson

Re:	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-1418	– Additional	Information	Requested

Per	your	email	dated	July	8,	2015	the	additional	information	you’ve	requested	is	provided	below.	

Please	attach	this	to	the	original	petition	for	further	processing.

All	of	petitioner’s intended	use	sUAS	(Small	Unmanned	Aerial	System)	platforms	are	multi-rotorcraft	

(quad	copter)	sUAS	platforms weighing	no	more	than	55lbs.	including	payload.	Under	normal	

conditions	they	operate	at	speeds	of	no	more	than	50kts., and	have	the	ability	to	hover	and	move	

along	a	vertical	and	horizontal	plane	simultaneously.

The	following	is	a	current	list	of	the	sUAS	platforms	that	will	be	used	in	petitioners	proposed	

operation.	Should	additional	sUAS	platforms	be	acquired	for	use	as	indicated	in	petition	they	will	not	

exceed	55	lbs	operating	weight	(including	payload)	or	operate	in	excess	of	50	kts.	Additionally,	(or	as	

directed	by	the	FAA)	an	addendum	to	this	exemption	will	be	requested	from	the	FAA	for	approval	of	

any	additional	sUAS	acquired	prior	to	their	commercial	use	by	petitioner.

The	multi-rotorcraft	(quad	copters) to	be	used in	proposed	initial	operation	are	presented	below	–

(Make,	model,	maximum	operating	weight	and	type	of	sUAS	as	shown	in	their	respective	aircraft	

manuals):

sUAS	#1

Make	– DJI

Model	– Inspire	1	– T600

Type	– Multi-Rotorcraft (quad	copter)

Max	Operating	Weight	– 7	lbs.	(includes	battery	and	payload)

Max	Operating	Speed	– 43	kts.

sUAS	#2

Make	– Yuneec	Electric	Aviation

Model	– Typhoon	- Q500	

Type	– Multi-Rotorcraft (quad	copter)

Max	Operating	Weight	– 3	lbs.	12	oz.	(includes	battery	and	payload)

Max	Operating	Speed	– 47	kts
Docket	No.	FAA-2015-1418

Petitioner	– Jackie	E.	Watson

Page	2	of 2

sUAS	#3

Make	– Walkera

Model	– Scout	– X4

Type	– Multi–Rotorcraft (quad	copter)

Max	Operating	Weight	– 5	lbs.	(includes	battery	and	payload)

Max	Operating	Speed	– 41	kts.

sUAS	#4

Make	– Turbo	Ace

Model	– Matrix	– S

Type	– Multi-Rotorcraft (quad	copter)

Max	Operating	Weight	– 10	lbs.

Max	Operating	Speed	– 45	kts.

Please	contact	me	immediately	if	you	require	additional	information	at:

jackwatsonphotography@hotmail.com

Telephone	– 386-871-0269

Regards,

Jackie	(Jack)	E.	Watson
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 20, 1995 (98), Para 98.29 Subpoena]
[Page 1168]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.98.29  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                     Chief Administrative Officer,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington DC, July 20, 1995.

     RE: State of Illinois v. Melvin Reynolds
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to rule L (50) of the Rule of the House that my Office has 
     been served with a subpoena issued by the Circuit Court of 
     Cook Country, Illinois.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoena is consistent 
     with the privileges and precedents of the House.
       Sincerely,
                                                 Scot M. Faulkner,
                                    Chief Administrative Officer.
```
EX-4.48



 Exhibit 4.48 
  

			
	From:	  	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
		  	(Registration No. 1950/038232/06)
		  	Block 27
		  	Randfontein Office Park
		  	Cnr Main Reef Road & Ward Avenue
		  	Randfontein
		  	(the “Lender”)
		
	To:	  	Business Venture Investments No. 1688 Proprietary Limited
		  	(Registration No. 2012/035756/07)
		  	268 Jubilee Avenue
		  	Halfway House
		  	Midrand
		  	1682
		  	(the “Borrower” and together with the Lender, the “Parties”)

 10 May 2013 
 Dear
Sirs 
 Term loan facility agreement entered into between the Borrower (as borrower) and the Lender (as lender) on or about 20 March 2013 in
terms of which the Lender agreed to advance a loan to the Borrower, all on the terms and conditions contained therein (the “Facility Agreement”) 
  

	1.	Reference is made to the Facility Agreement. Save as defined herein, terms defined in the Facility Agreement (whether directly or by way of incorporation by reference) shall bear the meanings ascribed thereto therein
when used in this letter (this “Extension Letter”). 

  

	2.	The Lender hereby agrees that the date referred to in clause 3.4 of the Facility Agreement is extended to 14 June 2013 (or such later date as may be agreed by the Lender). 


 

	3.	Save as expressly contemplated in this Extension Letter, the Facility Agreement shall remain unamended and, subject to its terms, of full force and effect. 


 

	4.	This Extension Letter comprises a written amendment to the Facility Agreement within the contemplation of clause 28.5.1 thereof and constitutes the whole agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter
hereof. 

  

	5.	This Extension Letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. 








 As witnessed by the duly authorised representatives of the parties hereto 

Signed for and on behalf of: 
  

			
	 /s/

	
	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
		
	Name:	 	
		
	Title:	 	
		
	Date:	 	
		
	Witness:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 24, 1995 (72), Para 72.3 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 808]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.72.3  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. GOODLATTE, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule today: the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services, the Committee on Commerce, the Committee 
on Economic and Educational Opportunities, the Committee on Government 
Reform and Oversight, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on 
National Security, the Committee on Resources, and the Permanent Select 
Committee on Intelligence.
```