alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: zeze1070@yahoo.com [mailto:zeze1070@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marion Steininger 

1070 Pendleton Court 

Voorhees, NJ 08043
From: thebaldies@msn.com [mailto:thebaldies@msn.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Pam Baldus 

4925 N 103rd St 

Milwaukee, WI 53225
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1880 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1880

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 1995

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 102 
 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ``Edward Madigan Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 102 South McLean, 
Lincoln, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``Edward 
Madigan Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Edward Madigan Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             395,511
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,425,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        27,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,870,845
<PP&E>                                            360,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                     88,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,400,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,509,126
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         1,700
<COMMON>                                        1,863,575
<OTHER-SE>                                        250,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,400,970
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,571,603
<CGS>                                           6,021,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,848,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              8,084,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,297,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        4,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,866,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 1,436,015
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,890,078)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.23)



</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: pugpsych@aol.com [mailto:pugpsych@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Linda C. Snyder 

123 Snyder Road 

Slippery Rock, PA 16057
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Richard D. Crowley, Jr. of Integrated Device
Technology, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 28, 2008 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: February 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ RICHARD D. CROWLEY, JR.
|                        |  |  |  | Richard D. Crowley, Jr.    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer    

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
-----Original Message----- 

From: rachel.turback@gmail.com [mailto:rachel.turback@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

rachel turback 

1303 Washington Common 

Hillsborough, NJ 08844
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7027

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

OSCAR HERNANDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00027-RLV-DCK-4; 5:12-cv00194-RLV)

Submitted: November 21, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oscar Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Oscar Hernandez seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hernandez has not made the requisite showing.∗

 Accordingly, 

 ∗ Although the district court failed to give Hernandez 

notice under Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), 

our certificate of appealability assessment convinces us that 

this omission was harmless.
3

we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 179.500-1 Tanks built under these specifications shall meet the requirements of § 179.500.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.155 Exceptions for Class 9 (miscellaneous hazardous materials). ( a ) *General.* Exceptions for hazardous materials shipments in the following paragraphs are permitted only if this section is referenced for the specific hazardous material in the § 172.101 table of this subchapter.
( b ) *Limited quantities of Class 9 materials.* Limited quantities of miscellaneous hazardous materials in Packing Groups II and III are excepted from labeling requirements, unless the material is offered for transportation or transported by aircraft, and are excepted from the specification packaging requirements of this subchapter when packaged in combination packagings according to this paragraph. Unless otherwise specified in paragraph (c) of this section, packages of limited quantities intended for transportation by aircraft must conform to the applicable requirements (*e.g.,* authorized materials, inner packaging quantity limits and closure securement) of § 173.27 of this part. A limited quantity package that conforms to the provisions of this section is not subject to the shipping paper requirements of subpart C of part 172 of this subchapter, unless the material meets the definition of a hazardous substance, hazardous waste, marine pollutant, or is offered for transportation and transported by aircraft or vessel, and is eligible for the exceptions provided in § 173.156 of this part. In addition, packages of limited quantities are not subject to subpart F (Placarding) of part 172 of this subchapter. Each package must conform to the packaging requirements of subpart B of this part and may not exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight. Except for transportation by aircraft, the following combination packagings are authorized: ( 1 ) For miscellaneous materials in Packing Group II, inner packagings not over 1.0 L (0.3 gallon) net capacity each for liquids or not over 1.0 kg (2.2 pounds) net capacity each for solids, packed in a strong outer packaging.
( 2 ) For miscellaneous materials in Packing Group III, inner packagings not over 5.0 L (1.3 gallons) net capacity each for liquids or not over 5.0 kg (11 lbs) net capacity each for solids, packed in a strong outer packaging.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Reverse logistics.* Except for Lithium batteries, hazardous materials meeting the definition of “reverse logistics” under § 171.8 of this subchapter and in compliance with paragraph (b) of this section may be offered for transport and transported in highway transportation in accordance with § 173.157.
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52634, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66270, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 173-231, 57 FR 52940, Nov. 5, 1992; Amdt. 173-253, 61 FR 27174, May 30, 1996; 71 FR 14603, Mar. 22, 2006; 76 FR 3375, Jan. 19, 2011; 78 FR 1114, Jan. 7, 2013; 81 FR 18540, Mar. 31, 2016; 87 FR 79776, Dec. 27, 2022]
§ 178.348-1 General requirements. ( a ) Each specification DOT 412 cargo tank motor vehicle must conform to the general design and construction requirements in § 178.345 in addition to the specific requirements of this section.
( b ) The MAWP of each cargo tank must be at least 5 psig.
( c ) The MAWP for each cargo tank designed to be loaded by vacuum must be at least 25 psig internal and 15 psig external.
( d ) Each cargo tank having a MAWP greater than 15 psig must be of circular cross-section.
( e ) Each cargo tank having a— ( 1 ) MAWP greater than 15 psig must be “constructed and certified in conformance with Section VIII of the ASME Code” (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter); or
( 2 ) MAWP of 15 psig or less must be “constructed in accordance with Section VIII of the ASME Code,” except as modified herein: ( i ) The recordkeeping requirements contained in Section VIII of the ASME Code do not apply. Parts UG-90 through 94 in Section VIII do not apply. Inspection and certification must be made by an inspector registered in accordance with subpart F of part 107.
( ii ) Loadings must be as prescribed in § 178.345-3.
( iii ) The knuckle radius of flanged heads must be at least three times the material thickness, and in no case less than 0.5 inch. Stuffed (inserted) heads may be attached to the shell by a fillet weld. The knuckle radius and dish radius versus diameter limitations of UG-32 do not apply for cargo tank motor vehicles with a MAWP of 15 psig or less. Shell sections of cargo tanks designed with a non-circular cross section need not be given a preliminary curvature, as prescribed in UG-79(b).
( iv ) Marking, certification, data reports, and nameplates must be as prescribed in §§ 178.345-14 and 178.345-15.
( v ) Manhole closure assemblies must conform to §§ 178.345-5.
( vi ) Pressure relief devices must be as prescribed in § 178.348-4.
( vii ) The hydrostatic or pneumatic test must be as prescribed in § 178.348-5.
( viii ) The following paragraphs in parts UG and UW in Section VIII of the ASME Code do not apply: UG-11, UG-12, UG-22(g), UG-32(e), UG-34, UG-35, UG-44, UG-76, UG-77, UG-80, UG-81, UG-96, UG-97, UW-13(b)(2), UW-13.1(f), and the dimensional requirements found in Figure UW-13.1.
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25031, June 12, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37065, Sept. 7, 1990; Amdt. 178-89, 56 FR 27877, June 17, 1991; 65 FR 58632, Sept. 29, 2000; 68 FR 19285, Apr. 18, 2003; 68 fR 75756, Dec. 31, 2003]
§ 78.23-1 Unnecessary whistling prohibited. ( a ) The unnecessary sounding of the vessel's whistle is prohibited within any harbor limits of the United States.
( b ) [Reserved]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.12 Speaker and Minority Leader to Accept Resignations, Appoint Commissions]
[Page 818]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.12  speaker and minority leader to accept resignations, appoint 
          commissions

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That, notwithstanding any adjournment of the House until 
Tuesday, June 6, 1995, the Speaker and the Minority Leader be authorized 
to accept resignations and to make appointments to commissions, boards 
and committees duly authorized by law or by the House.
```
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and
belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 13, 2003, by NTS-Properties III (the Periodic Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-Properties
III.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NTS-Properties III and will be
retained by NTS-Properties III and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital
Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates,
General Partner of NTS-Properties III

---
§ 1115.3 Board actions other than initial decisions. ( a ) A discretionary appeal of an entire Board action is permitted. Such an appeal should be designated a “petition for reconsideration.”
( b ) The petition will be granted only upon a showing of one or more of the following points: ( 1 ) The prior action will be affected materially because of new evidence or changed circumstances.
( 2 ) The prior action involves material error.
( c ) The petition must state in detail the nature of and reasons for the relief requested. When, in a petition filed under this section, a party seeks an opportunity to introduce evidence, the evidence must be stated briefly and must not appear to be cumulative, and an explanation must be given why it was not previously adduced.
( d ) The petition and any reply must not exceed 20 pages in length. A separate preface and summary of argument, not exceeding 3 pages, may accompany petitions and replies and must accompany those that exceed 10 pages in length.
( e ) Petitions must be filed within 20 days after the service of the action or within any further period (not to exceed 20 days) as the Board may authorize. However, in cases under Final Offer Rate Review and in cases seeking expedited relief for service emergencies under the accelerated process at 49 CFR 1146.2, petitions must be filed within 5 days after the service of the action, and replies to petitions must be filed within 10 days after the service of the action.
( f ) The filing of a petition will not automatically stay the effect of a prior action, but the Board may stay the effect of the action on its own motion or on petition. A petition to stay may be filed in advance of the petition for reconsideration and shall be filed within 10 days of service of the action. No reply need be filed. However, if a party elects to file a reply, it must reach the Board no later than 16 days after service of the action. In all proceedings, the action, if not stayed, will become effective 30 days after it is served, unless the Board provides for the action to become effective at a different date. On the day the action is served parties may initiate judicial review.
[61 FR 52714, Oct. 8, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 58491, Nov. 15, 1996; 88 FR 320, Jan. 4, 2023; 89 FR 4578, Jan. 24, 2024]
Exhibit
32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of China
International Tourism Holdings Ltd (the "Company") for the year ended December
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, Lei, Ming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  CHINA
      INTERNATIONAL TOURISM HOLDINGS LTD
                (Registrant)Date: August
      18, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Lei,
      MingLei,
      Ming
                Chief
      Executive Officer
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                THE RANDERS GROUP INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES



        The following companies are subsidiaries of The Randers Group
Incorporated.  Each of the following companies are (a) wholly owned
subsidiaries, and (b) are incorporated in the state shown beside their
respective names:

     Randers Engineering, Inc. (Michigan)

     Clark-Trombley Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Michigan)

     Redeco Incorporated  (Michigan)

     Randers Group Property Corporation (Michigan)

     Viridian Technology, Inc. (Michigan)

     Randers-EPC Incorporated (Illinois) (Inactive)

     Randers Engineering of Massachusetts, Inc.(Michigan)(Inactive)


     Clark-Trombley Consulting Engineers, Inc. does business under the name
"Clark-Trombley-Randers". No other subsidiary operates under an assumed name.
|   | **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS** | **EXHIBIT 23** |
|--------|-------------------------------------|----------------|

The Board of Directors BSB Bancorp,Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements:

                    File No. 33-92138 on Form S-8,

                    File No. 33-24714 on Form S-8,

                    File No. 33-78442 on Form S-8, and

                    File No. 333-42950 on Form S-8

of BSB Bancorp, Inc.of our report dated January 23, 2003, relating to the consolidated statement of condition of BSB Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’equity, and cashflows for the year then ended, which report is incorporated by reference into the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSB Bancorp, Inc.

| /s/ KPMG LLP                        |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |   |
| **Albany, New York March 26, 2003** |   |