alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: jimwoodward100@hotmail.com [mailto:jimwoodward100@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jim Woodward 

288 NE 40th Ct 

Oakland Park, FL 33334
#### Elizabeth M. Chapman, Appellant, v. The Village of Silver Creek, Respondent.

Order reveled, with costs. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2005 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2005

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections 
       in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall, before the 
end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, make such corrections to the map described in subsection (b) as 
are necessary--
            (1) to move on that map the eastern boundary of the 
        excluded area covering Ocean Beach, Seaview, Ocean Bay Park, 
        and part of Point O'Woods to the western boundary of the Sunken 
        Forest Preserve; and
            (2) to ensure that on that map the depiction of areas as 
        ``otherwise protected areas'' does not include any area that is 
        owned by the Point O'Woods Association (a privately held 
        corporation under the laws of the State of New York).
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'', dated October 24, 1990, that relates to the unit of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled Fire Island Unit NY-59P.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                1000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                      119
<SECURITIES>                2,909
<RECEIVABLES>               3,059
<ALLOWANCES>                0
<INVENTORY>                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>            6,153
<PP&E>                      26,555
<DEPRECIATION>              10,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              22,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       4,516
<BONDS>                     422
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>       0
<PREFERRED>                 0
<COMMON>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                  17,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>22,581
<SALES>                     5,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            5,729
<CGS>                       1,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>               1,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>          58
<INCOME-PRETAX>             3,959
<INCOME-TAX>                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         0
<DISCONTINUED>              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>             0
<CHANGES>                   0
<NET-INCOME>                3,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>               0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>               0.36
        

</TABLE>
# Yellowstone Valley Citizens Council

220 S. 27 th St. Billings, Montana 59101
Phone: (406) 248

- 1154 Fax: (406) 248

- 2110 E

- mail: info@norther nplains.org Web: www.northernplains.org June 4, 2013

US EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, CO 80202

- 1129

Dear Mr. James Martin, Regional Administrator:

We write in regards to the EPA’s pending designation of SO 2 nonattainment for Yellowstone County (excluding the Crow Tribe of Montana ).

We support the EPA’s preliminary intentions described in the letter dated February 6, 2013 to Governor Bullock to designate as nonattainment most areas in locations where existing monitoring data from 2009

- 2011 indicate violations of the 1

- hour SO 2 st andard. In fact, we would like to see all areas in locations with SO 2 violations incl uded in the nonattainment area so that all major contributors of SO 2 emissions will have to limit the amount of additional air pollution they emit until Yellowstone County returns to
attainment status.

We also support your decision that it is not appropriate to disregard 2010 data, as was suggested by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality.

As Yellowstone County residents, we deserve the right to breathe clean air, and support the EPA’s mission to protect human health and the environment. Thank you for your attention to this issue. We look forward to breathing cleaner air in Yellowstone County.

Sincerely,

Amaya Garcia and David Strong, co

- chairs

cc: C rystal Ostigaard, EPA
-----Original Message----- 

From: ontherun@aboutmontana.net [mailto:ontherun@aboutmontana.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:04 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Gil Jordan 

P.O. Box 130373 

Coram, MT 59913
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

**VIACQUISITION CORP.**

**400West 48th Avenue**

**Denver,CO 80216**

** **

March 1, 2006

 

Anthony J. Carroll

5535 Preserve Drive

Greenwood Village, Colorado 80121

 

Dear Mr. Carroll:

 

Reference is hereby made to the Equity PurchaseAgreement dated as of April 22, 2005 by and between VI Acquisition Corp., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”) and Anthony Carroll (“Carroll”)(such agreement, the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Carrollpurchased 284.087 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, par value$0.0001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), at a purchase price of$1,134.16 per share (such Preferred Stock purchased by Carroll, the “CarrollStock”). The purchase price for the Carroll Stock included the dividendsthat would have accrued on the Carroll Stock had such stock been issued on June13, 2003, although such dividends had not actually accrued on the Carroll Stockas of the date of purchase.

 

The Company hereby agrees that upon receipt by theholders of the Preferred Stock of any payment in respect of the dividendsaccrued on such shares of Preferred Stock from June 13, 2003 through April 22,2005 (the “Dividend Payment”), whether as a result of the payment ofaccrued dividends on the Preferred Stock by the Company, the purchase of the PreferredStock by the Company or a third party, or otherwise, Carroll shall be entitledto receive a payment from the Company equal to the amount that Carroll wouldhave received had Carroll (i) held the shares of Carroll Stock from June 13,2003 through April 22, 2005, (ii) accrued dividends on such shares of CarrollStock during such period, and (iii) received a portion of the Dividend Paymentin respect of such accrued dividends.

 

The foregoing payment right shall terminate on a prorata basis in proportion to the number of shares of Carroll Stock that may berepurchased by the Company prior to the occurrence of the Dividend Payment.

 
|   | VI ACQUISITION CORP. |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |
|   | By:                  | /s/ Debra Koenig |   |
|   | Name:                | Debra Koenig |   |
|   | Title:               | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 
| Acknowledged and agreed |
|-------------------------|
| as of March 10, 2006    |
|                    |
| /s/ Anthony J. Carroll  |   |
| Anthony J. Carroll      |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Dark Dynamite Inc (the
      "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wang, Xiao Jun,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun


Chief
      Financial Officer





March
      9,
      2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 179.220-25 Stamping.

(a) To certify that the tank complies with all specification requirements, each outer shell must be plainly and permanently stamped in letters and figures at least 3⁄8-inch high into the metal near the center of both outside heads as follows:

| | Examples of required stamping |
| --- | --- |
| Specifications | DOT-115A60W6. |
| Inner container: | |
| Material | ASTM A240-316L. |
| Shell thickness | Shell 0.167 in. |
| Head thickness | Head 0.150 in. |
| Tank builders initials | ABC. |
| Date of original test | 00-0000. |
| Outer shell: | |
| Material | ASTM A285-C. |
| Tank builders initials | WYZ. |
| Car assembler (if other than inner container or outer shell builders) | DEF. |

(b) After July 25, 2012, newly constructed DOT tank cars must have their DOT specification and other required information stamped plainly and permanently on stainless steel identification plates in conformance with the applicable requirements prescribed in § 179.24(a). Tank cars built before July 25, 2012, may have the identification plates instead of or in addition to the head stamping.

[Amdt. 179-9, 36 FR 21343, Nov. 6, 1971, as amended at 77 FR 37986, June 25, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                       769
<INVENTORY>                                     58,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,773
<PP&E>                                         112,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,639
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   259,569
<SALES>                                        122,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,829
<CGS>                                           55,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,320
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,320
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6690

RONALD FLOYD JACKSON,

Movant - Appellant,

and

CHARLES LEE STUBBS, a/k/a T-Bone,

Plaintiff,

versus

CHARLES E. FOLEY, Sheriff of Marlboro County,

in his personal and individual capacity and

individual capacity as Policy Maker for the

Marlboro County Sheriff's Department; DENNIS

RUSTY PARRISH, Deputy Sheriff; CHARLES LEMMON,

Deputy Sheriff; PEARLIE THOMAS, Deputy Sheriff; HENRY ABRAHAM, Deceased Deputy Sheriff;

JERRY STARNES, Deputy Sheriff in their personal and individual capacities; TWO OR THREE

UNNAMED STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS TO BE

AMENDED,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

COUNTY OF MARLBORO, in their personal and

individual capacity as the Governing Entity

and Policy Maker of Marlboro County,

Defendant.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-93-859-3-20BC)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Floyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King,

WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for reconsideration of the voluntary dismissal entered in

this case. Because he is neither the deceased party's personal representative or his attorney of record, Appellant lacks standing to

prosecute this appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 43(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
3
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.753 Caulked bell and spigot joints. ( a ) Each cast iron caulked bell and spigot joint that is subject to pressures of more than 25 psi (172kPa) gage must be sealed with: ( 1 ) A mechanical leak clamp; or
( 2 ) A material or device which: ( i ) Does not reduce the flexibility of the joint;
( ii ) Permanently bonds, either chemically or mechanically, or both, with the bell and spigot metal surfaces or adjacent pipe metal surfaces; and
( iii ) Seals and bonds in a manner that meets the strength, environmental, and chemical compatibility requirements of §§ 192.53 (a) and (b) and 192.143.
( b ) Each cast iron caulked bell and spigot joint that is subject to pressures of 25 psi (172kPa) gage or less and is exposed for any reason must be sealed by a means other than caulking.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-25, 41 FR 23680, June 11, 1976; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37504, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53901, Sept. 15, 2003]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.26 Providing for the Consideration of H. Con. Res. 67]
[Page 747]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.26  providing for the consideration of h. con. res. 67

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-125) the resolution (H. Res. 149) providing for consideration of 
the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) setting forth the 
congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal 
years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 30, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01159-CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-08410-U MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case have not been filed. By postcard October 28, 2022, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appella nt to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so woul d result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated October 28, 2022, we notified appellant the docketing statement was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal. On December 30, 2022, we sent a letter informing appellant the cler k’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s reco rd. We directed appellant to provide,–2– within ten days, verification she had either paid for or made a rrangements to pay for the record or was entitled to proceed w ithout payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismi ssal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise co rresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

221159F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III / BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF G.B., A CHILD
No. 05-22-01159-CV On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-08410- U. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. Justices Goldstein and Smith participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered January 30, 2023
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 91292          Scale: 12,521          Edition: 4          Edition Date: 12-SEP-98          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1998/48**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 148 (Thursday, August 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 42445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3785]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time:  Tuesday, August 7, 2007, at 12:30 p.m.; and Wednesday, 
August 8, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

Status:  August 7-12:30 p.m.--Closed; August 8-8:30 a.m.--Open; August 
8-10:30 a.m.--Closed.

Matters To Be Considered 

Tuesday, August 7 at 12:30 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Preliminary Report on Goals and Performance Assessment for 
Fiscal Year 2008.
    3. Financial Update.
    4. Preliminary Fiscal Year 2008 Integrated Financial Plan and 
Financial Outlook.
    5. Rate Case Update.
    6. Labor Negotiations Update.
    7. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    8. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Wednesday, August 8 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of Previous Meetings, May 1-2; June 19; and July 10, 
2007.
    2. Remarks of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board.
    3. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO Jack Potter.
    4. Committee Reports.
    5. Quarterly Report on Service Performance.
    6. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.
    7. Tentative Agenda for the September 25-26, 2007, meeting in 
Washington, DC.

Wednesday, August 8 at 10:30 a.m. (Closed)--if needed

    1. Continuation of Tuesday's closed session agenda.

Contact Person for More Information:  Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-3785 Filed 7-30-07; 4:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v.

REESE F. KING and JANET A. KING,

Respondents.

No. 2D22-967

September 23, 2022

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Polk County; 

James A. Yancey, Judge.

Andrew A. Labbe of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.

Mark A. Nation of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, and Ashley 

McMahan of Morgan & Morgan, Orlando, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### Julius Catlin, Jr., and another, *Appellants, v.*Ralph Moss and others, Respondents.

Order reversed. Order entered as directed in opinion by

Daniels, J.
§ 176.138 Deck stowage. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Class 1 (explosives) may not be stowed within a horizontal distance of 6 m (20 feet) from any source of heat and any possible sources of ignition. With the exception of division 1.4 (explosive) materials, Class 1 (explosives) materials may not be stowed within a horizontal distance of 12 m (39 feet) from the bridge, accommodation areas, and lifesaving appliances.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 69 FR 76184, Dec. 20, 2004; 78 FR 1095, Jan. 7, 2013]