alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w8



 






Exhibit 10.8




2006 Incentive Bonus Program




Performance Criteria





	 	 	The following two performance criteria will be used in each entity as measurements in 2006 Bonus
Program:






	•	 	Top Line Growth- 50%






	 	•	 	Net Interest Income plus Fee Income






	•	 	Cash Flow Growth- 50%






	 	•	 	Net Income After Tax, before loan loss provision, after actual net charge offs





Targeted Base Salary Percentage




The targeted base salary percentage for bonus payment at three possible achievement levels
(Threshold, Target and Superior) for each employment level within the Company shall be determined
by the FBFS Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. If targeted
percentages for any employment level shall be based on a range, then the percentage for each
participating individual within such level shall be determined by the Compensation Committee or
management, as appropriate. The targeted base salary percentages for each participating individual
shall be promptly communicated to such individual.



Mix of the Payout




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Corporate	 	Entity
	FBFS Employees
	 	 	100	%	 	 	n/a	 
	Other Employees
	 	 	25	%	 	 	75	%






Safeguards




The cash flow percentage is self-funding.

The after-tax net income must meet or exceed the aggregate bonus payment.




Eligibility




Employees must work a minimum of 30 hours per week to qualify for the bonus program. Employees
must be hired by October 1, 2006 to be eligible for the 2006 Bonus Program. All employees must be
employed on the date of payout to receive their bonus.



If an employee is promoted before October 1, 2006, then that employee will be eligible for the
bonus percentage that is commensurate with their new position for that year.
JOSE DEMETRIO PINEDA,

Appellant, 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00144-CR

Appeal from the

109th District Court

Of Winkler, Texas

(TC# DC17-5684)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Oak Tree Condominium Association, :

Appellant :

:

v. :

:

John R. Greene, Sr. and Linda M. Greene, :

and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and :

Gary A. Hartman, Sheriff : No. 794 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, March 15 , 2016, upon consideration of appellant’s application for

rearg ument , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
Ex 10.1


Exhibit 10.1


LIGGETT GROUP LLC
100 Maple Lane
Mebane, NC 27302-8160 










October 29, 2013








Mr. Ronald J. Bernstein
329 Circle Park Place
Chapel Hill, NC 27517 


Dear Ron: 


This letter agreement constitutes an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated as of November 11, 2005 and as amended on January 14, 2011, (the “Agreement”), between Liggett Group Inc. (the “Company”) and Ronald J. Bernstein (“Executive”). The Company and Executive wish to further amend the Agreement as set forth below. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement. 


		
	A.
	The Agreement is amended in the following respects: 




		
	1.
	Section 3(a) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced by the following:


 
(a) Salary. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company shall pay Executive a base salary of $1,000,000 per annum, as the same may be increased from time to time as provided herein (the “Salary”), payable in installments at such regular intervals as the Company customarily pays its other executives (but in no event less often than monthly). 


		
	B.
	This letter agreement constitutes an amendment to and a modification of the Agreement and shall for all purposes be considered a part of the Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement is confirmed and ratified in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect. 




Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning two copies of this letter agreement in the space provided below and returning one of such copies to us. 


Very truly yours, 


LIGGETT GROUP LLC and LIGGETT VECTOR BRANDS LLC	
			
	 
	 
	




	By:
	 
	/s/ John R. Long

	 
	 
	John R. Long
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

	 
	 
	 

















Exhibit 10.1




The foregoing letter agreement
is consented and agreed to as
of the date first above written. 
	
			
	 
	 
	




	By:
	 
	/s/ Ronald J. Bernstein

	 
	 
	Ronald J. Bernstein








Vector Group Ltd.
(as to Sections 3(c), 3(d), 3(f) and 7 only) 
	
			
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III

	 
	 
	J. Bryant Kirkland III
Vice President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.175 Permeation devices. Permeation devices that contain hazardous materials and that are used for calibrating air quality monitoring devices are not subject to the requirements of this subchapter provided the following requirements are met: ( a ) Each device must be constructed of a material compatible with the hazardous materials it contains;
( b ) The total contents of hazardous materials in each device is limited to 2 ml (0.07 ounces) and the device must not be liquid full at 55 °C (131 °F);
( c ) Each permeation device must be placed in a sealed, high impact resistant, tubular inner packaging of plastic or equivalent material. Sufficient absorbent material must be contained in the inner packaging to completely absorb the contents of the device. The closure of the inner packaging must be securely held in place with wire, tape or other positive means;
( d ) Each inner packaging must be contained in a secondary packaging constructed of metal, or plastic having a minimum thickness of 1.5 mm (0.06 inches). The secondary packaging must be hermetically sealed;
( e ) The secondary packaging must be securely packed in strong outer packaging. The completed package must be capable of withstanding, without breakage or leakage of any inner packaging and without significant reduction in effectiveness: ( 1 ) The following free drops onto a rigid, non resilient, flat and horizontal surface from a height of 1.8 m (5.9 feet): ( i ) One drop flat on the bottom;
( ii ) One drop flat on the top;
( iii ) One drop flat on the long side;
( iv ) One drop flat on the short side;
( v ) One drop on a corner at the junction of three intersecting edges; and
( 2 ) A force applied to the top surface for a duration of 24 hours, equivalent to the total weight of identical packages if stacked to a height of 3 m (10 feet) (including the test sample).
( 3 ) Each of the above tests may be performed on different but identical packages.
( f ) The gross mass of the completed package must not exceed 30 kg.
( g ) For transportation by aircraft, permeation devices must be transported as cargo and may not be carried onboard an aircraft by passengers or crewmembers in carry-on baggage, checked baggage, or on their person unless specifically excepted by § 175.10.
[76 FR 43530, July 20, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 1087, Jan. 7, 2013]
BONUS ARRANGEMENTS

     The following bonus arrangements have been made for the officers named with
respect to profits of the Company for fiscal year 1999:

<TABLE>

                      PART I      PART II (1)
<S>                    <C>            <C>
Mr. Adler          10% of base         7%
                      salary

Mr. Montano        10% of base         5%
                      salary

Mr. Mason          10% of base         4%
                      salary

Mr. Noland  (2)    10% of base         2%
                      salary
</TABLE>


(1)  The bonus for each of the officers named has two components.  Part I
requires that the pre-tax profit of the Company equal or exceed 95% of budgeted
levels.  If corporate profits reach the target level, the named officer will get
the Part I bonus indicated.  Part II requires that pre-tax profits meet or
exceed 25% of the Company's net worth as of January 1, 1999 ("Base Net Worth").
If the profits exceed 25% of the Base Net Worth, the named officer will get the
percentage specified of the excess of profits over the Base Net Worth.

(2)  Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Noland's minimum bonus for fiscal
year 1999 will be $20,000.
Case 2:15-cr-20201-MOB-MKM ECF No. 345, PageID.2393 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cr-20201-MOB-MKM ECF No. 345, PageID.2394 Filed 01/11/19 Page 2 of 2
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.11 Foreign Operations Appropriations, FY 96]
[Page 1053]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.11  foreign operations appropriations, fy 96

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. OXLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 170 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1868) making appropriations for foreign operations, 
export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending 
September 30 1996, and for other purposes.
  Mr. HANSEN, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the chair; 
and after some time spent therein,
```
From: skarger@alumni.brandeis.edu [mailto:skarger@alumni.brandeis.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and Pete 

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for "physical" 

health care; mental illness is as "real" and debilitating as so called 

"physical" disease. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

stephanie karger 

38 wauwinet rd 

w newton, MA 02465
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 24, 1995 (100), Para 100.4 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 1179]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.100.4  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Friday, July 21, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.39 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1123]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.39  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. LIGHTFOOT: Committee on Appropriations. H.R. 2020. A 
     bill making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the 
     U.S. Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, 
     and certain independent agencies, for the fiscal year ending 
     September 30, 1996, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-
     183). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
       Mr. LINDER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 188. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1976) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
     Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related 
     Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
     1996, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-185). Referred to 
     the House Calendar.
       Ms. PRYCE: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 187. 
     Resolution providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1977) making appropriations for the Department of the 
     Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
     September 30, 1996, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-
     184). Referred to the House Calendar.
```
Presidential Documents

44723 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 153 

Thursday, August 9, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8164 of August 6, 2007 

Women’s Equality Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Women’s Equality Day, we commemorate the adoption of the 19th 

Amendment to our Constitution and the strong leadership of extraordinary 

women who have made America a more perfect Union by advancing women’s 

suffrage. 

At the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848, a group of visionaries gathered 

to proclaim the ideas that ‘‘all men and women are created equal’’ and 

‘‘endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.’’ That gathering 

grew into a national movement that led to the ratification of the 19th 

Amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote. This achievement reflects 

the vision and determination of the suffragists who stood for a freer society 

and changed our Nation’s history. 

Since the passage of the 19th Amendment, pioneers such as Margaret Chase 

Smith and Sandra Day O’Connor rose above obstacles and broke down 

barriers to equality. Today, American women are shaping our Nation and 

the world by serving in all walks of life. Many brave women volunteer 

to wear the uniform of the United States, and they serve as an inspiration 

to all. 

Our Nation is grateful for the bold leadership of American women who 

have opened doors of opportunity for women of future generations. On 

Women’s Equality Day we honor the suffragists and all those who seek 

to expand equality in our world. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 26, 2007, as 

Women’s Equality Day. I call upon the people of the United States to 

celebrate the achievements of women and observe this day with appropriate 

programs and activities. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3

44724 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 153 / Thursday, August 9, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of 

August, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–3918 

Filed 8–8–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 8, 2014

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 176.97 Prohibition of dump scows.

Dump scows are barges having cargo carrying compartments of the hopper type and fitted with a bottom dump or a side dump. This type of barge is prohibited from the carriage of any class of hazardous material.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 98-CE-001-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 11.0 $ 935.00 $40 $ 975.00 1,196 $1,166,100.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,166,100

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 5.0 $ 425.00 $500 $ 925.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 16, 2013

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANQUE CENTRALE POPULAIRE | FBSEA          | Banque Centrale Populaire, Casablanca, Morocco, to establish a representative office in Washington, D.C. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1519.

#### Sharwell v. Wimberly.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73299. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due August 10, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
ex10.17

 Exhibit 10.17
 

 LOAN AGREEMENT
 March 2, 2011
 

 Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) of 4 Montpelier Street, Suite 521, Knightsbridge, London, SW7 1EE, advanced US$11,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Borrower”) of 195 Park Avenue, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 1B9.  The Lender advanced the funds on March 2, 2011.
 The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 8% per year (the “Interest”) from March 2, 2011. The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.
 The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
 	 	 	
	 LENDER
	  
	 BORROWER

	 Richard N. Jeffs
	  
	 Red Metal Resources Ltd.

	  
	  
	  

	 Per:
	  
	 Per:

	  
	  
	  

	 /s/ Richard N. Jeffs
	  
	 /s/ Caitlin Jeffs

	 Richard N. Jeffs
	  
	 Authorized Signatory 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 	 	
	 Principal Amount:  US$11,000 
	 March 2, 2011


 

 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED Red Metal Resources Ltd., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum of $11,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from March 2, 2011 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.
 

 For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 8 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 8.3% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
 

 The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.
 

 The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.
 

 

 

 BORROWER
 Red Metal Resources Ltd.
 

 Per:
 

 /s/ Caitlin Jeffs
 Authorized signatory