alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending April 6, 2013

----

Forms            Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the Notice of Branch Closure (FR 4031) and Reports Related to Securities of State Member Banks as Required by Regulation H (Reg H-1) and to extend with revision the Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms (FR 2034).             -Approved, April 3, 2013                        Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Survey to Obtain Information on the Relevant Market in Individual Merger Cases (FR 2060) and Notice Claiming Status as an Exempt Transfer Agent (FR 4013) and to extend without revision the Request for Extension of Time to Dispose of Assets Acquired in Satisfaction of Debts Previously Contracted (FR 4006), Stock Redemption Notification (FR 4008), and Investment in Bank Premises Notification (FR 4014).            -Proposed, April 4, 2013            Personnel            Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation -- appointments of Catherine Piché  and Ryan Lordos as assistant directors and of Keith Ligon as adviser.            -Approved, April 1, 2013            Regulations and Policies            Regulation NN (Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions) -- final rule to provide standards, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, for Board-regulated institutions that engage in certain foreign exchange transactions with retail customers.            -Approved, April 1, 2013            Enforcement            HSH Nordbank AG, Hamburg, Germany, and HSH Nordbank AG, New York branch, New York, New York -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the New York State Department of Financial Services.            -Announced, April 4, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
-----Original Message----- 

From: david.misch@gmail.com [mailto:david.misch@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Misch 

1027 Princeton St. 

Santa Monica, CA 90403
#### In the Matter of the Will of George W. Ewen, *Deceased*.

Decree affirmed, with costs against appellants personally. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
#### Mary V. Pyle, Individually and as Trustee under the Will of William S. Pyle, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*James T. Pyle, as Trustee under the Will of William S. Pyle, Deceased, Appellant, and Mary V. Pyle et al., Respondents.

*Pyle v. Pyle,*137 App. Div. 568, 948, affirmed.

(Argued June 2, 1910;

decided June 17, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 8,1910, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action to have the appellant herein removed as trustee for alleged misconduct.

The following question was certified : *“*Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*John A. Garver*for appellant.

*Morgan J. O'Brien*and *George S.FranJclin*for plaintiff, respondent.

*Ralph W. Page*for defendants, respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
§ 1562.25 Fixed base operator requirements. ( a ) *Security program.* Each FBO must adopt and carry out an FBO Security Program.
( b ) *Screening and other duties.* Each FBO must— ( 1 ) Designate a security coordinator who meets the requirements in § 1562.23(b) of this part and is responsible for implementing the FBO Security Program and other security requirements required under this section, and provide TSA with the security coordinator's contact information and availability in accordance with the FBO Security Program.
( 2 ) Support the screening of persons and property in accordance with the requirements of this subpart and the FBO Security Program.
( 3 ) Support the search of aircraft in accordance with the requirements of this subpart and the FBO Security Program.
( 4 ) Restrict the distribution, disclosure, and availability of sensitive security information (SSI), as defined in part 1520 of this chapter, to persons with a need to know, and refer all requests for SSI by other persons to TSA.
( 5 ) Perform any other duties required under the FBO Security Program.
( c ) *Compliance.* ( 1 ) Each FBO must: ( i ) Permit TSA to conduct any inspections or tests, including copying records, to determine compliance with this part and the FBO Security Program.
( ii ) At the request of TSA, provide evidence of compliance with this part and the FBO Security Program, including copies of records.
( 2 ) Noncompliance with this part or the FBO Security Program may result in the cancellation of an aircraft operator's flight approvals and other remedial or enforcement action, as appropriate.
#### William D. Pindar, Appellant, *v.*Ormond E. Jenkins, Respondent.

*Pindar*v. *Jenkins,*128 App. Div. 711, reversed.

(Argued October 13, 1910;

decided October 28, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 30, 1908, affirming a judgment for nominal damages in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of employment.

*L. B. McKelvey*for appellant.

*W. P. Butler*for respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Kellogg, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-ray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

         Each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Superconductive
Components, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Daniel
Rooney and Curtis A. Loveland as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
or any of them individually with power to act without the other, as his or her
true and lawful attorney-in-fact, in his or her name and on his or her behalf,
and in any and all capacities stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and any and all amendments
thereto, hereby granting unto said attorneys, and to each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in
any and all such capacities, every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done
in and about the premises as fully as each of the undersigned could or might do
in person, hereby granting to each such attorney full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or his substitute
may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 26, 2004.

           Signature                               Title
           ---------                               -----

/s/ Daniel Rooney                   President, Chief Executive Officer and
-------------------------------     Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Daniel Rooney                       Director (principal executive officer)



/s/ Gerald S. Blaskie               Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
-------------------------------     officer and principal accounting officer)
Gerald S. Blaskie



/s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr.            Director
-------------------------------
Robert J. Baker, Jr.


/s/ Edward W. Ungar                 Director
-------------------------------
Edward W. Ungar
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2208MN

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District of

v. * Minnesota.

*

Malachi Andrews, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: September 4, 1997

Filed: September 11, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

After Malachi Andrews was sentenced for drug-related charges, including using

a firearm during a drug offense, the Supreme Court decided Bailey v. United States,

116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). In light of Bailey, the district court vacated the sentence

originally imposed on the firearm conviction and imposed a revised sentence on

Andrews's drug conviction with an enhancement based on his possession of a firearm.

On appeal, Andrews contends the district court improperly resentenced him on his drug

conviction. Andrews's arguments, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in

United States v. Harrison, 113 F.3d 135, 137-38 (8th Cir. 1997). We thus affirm

Andrews's revised drug sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11431

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VINCENT DANIEL FANUS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-25

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Vincent Daniel Fanus has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Fanus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11431 Document: 00515004191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2019
No. 18-11431

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-11431 Document: 00515004191 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2019
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23628-23629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09232]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities; Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Bird/Other 
Wildlife Strike Report

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. Wildlife strike data are collected to develop standards and 
monitor hazards to aviation.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 18, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at (405) 954-9362, or by 
email at: Kathy.A.DePaepe@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0045.
    Title: Bird/Other Wildlife Strike Report.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 5200-7.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: 14 CFR 139.337--Wildlife Hazard Management requires 
that wildlife strike data is collected to develop standards and monitor 
hazards to aviation. Data identify wildlife strike control requirements 
and provide in

[[Page 23629]]

service data on aircraft component failure. The FAA form 5200-7, Bird/
Other Wildlife Strike Report, is most often completed by the pilot-in-
charge of an aircraft involved in a wildlife collision or by Air 
Traffic Control Tower personnel, or other airline or airport personnel 
who have knowledge of the incident.
    Respondents: Approximately 7,666 pilots, air traffic control 
personnel, or other airline or airport personnel.
    Frequency: Information is collected as needed.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 5 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 613 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy 
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200, 6500 S. 
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 15, 2013.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises 
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2013-09232 Filed 4-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EXHIBIT
        23.1
 
  CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
          consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
          333-147547on
          Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-142848 on Form S-8 of our reports
          dated February 27, 2008, relating to the financial statements of PICO Holdings,
          Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified
          opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption
          of
          Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
          in Income
          Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1,
          2007, and of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,effective January 1, 2006) and the effectiveness of the Company's
          internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report
          on
          Form 10-K of PICO Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December
          31, 2007.
 /s/
        Deloitte & Touche LLP
  San
        Diego, CA
 February
        27, 2008
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
  /s/ Patrick J. Moty
    
    /s/ Samuel D. JimenezPatrick J. Moty
    
    Samuel D. JimenezPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EPA Meeting with Region 5 Tribes February 12, 2013

EPA Region 5 staff participated in the Region 5 Tribal Environmental Program Management Conference. EPA staff gave an update on the Proposed New Federal Requirements for Underground Storage Tanks.

**Attendees:** EPA Mark Restaino, EPA Region 5 Bob Egon, EPA Region 5 Kevin Hill, EPA Region 5 Sandy Siler, EPA Region 5 Sherry Kamke, EPA Region 5

Tribes Victoria Flowers, Oneida Tribes Scott Hanse n, Mille Lacs Band John Mead, I .T.E.P. Ed Kolodziejsk, Bad Ri ver Band Mark Parrish, Pokagon Band Amy Boetcher, NHBP Kathleen Broesemer, Sault Tribe of Chippewa
-----Original Message----- 

From: sandrasc@gci.net [mailto:sandrasc@gci.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra Coutolenc 

11 Antoinette Ave. 

Fairbanks, AK 99701
EXHIBIT 10.4.2

                  LEASE ADDENDUM THREE FOR MODIFICATION OF RENT

THIS ADDENDUM DATED February 12, 2004 shall be attached and considered  apart of
that certain Lease Agreement  entered into by and between James M. Roswell d/b/a
Burbank East Business Park, ("Landlord"), and Biopool International,  Inc. d/b/a
Xtrana,  Inc., a Delaware  Corporation  ("tenant"),  dated December 19, 2000, as
modified by the Lease  Addendum  One for  Increase in Space dated  December  21,
2001,  and Lease  Addendum  Two for  Modification  of Rent and  Option for Early
Termination  dated November 11, 2003.  For the promises  contained  herein,  and
other good and valuable consideration,  the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows.

The following  provisions shall hereby modify the aforementioned Lease Agreement
as modified by Lease Addendum One for Increase in Space dated December 21, 2001,
and Lease Addendum Two for Modification of Rent and Option for Early Termination
dated November 11, 2003.

The Section 1 of the Lease Addendum Two entitled Gross Rent Abatement,  shall be
replaced in its entirety with the following:

1.       GROSS RENT  ABATEMENT.  Landlord and Tenant agree to a 6 month  partial
         abatement  of the Gross  Rent in the amount of $5,000 per month for a 6
         month period  commencing  on December 1, 2003,  and expiring on May 31,
         2004.  During this abatement time period,  Tenant shall pay Landlord as
         Gross Rent the sum of fourteen  thousand,  eight  hundred,  thirty nine
         dollars and 75/100  ($14,839.75)  on or before  December 1, 2003, and a
         like  sum on or  before  the  first  day of each and  every  successive
         calendar month  thereafter  and expiring  March 31, 2004.  Landlord and
         Tenant agree that  commencing on April 1, 2004, and expiring on May 31,
         2004,  Tenant shall pay Landlord Gross Rent the sum of twelve thousand,
         one hundred, one dollars and 22/100 ($12,101.22).

It is hereby agreed and  understood  between  Landlord and Tenant that all other
terms and  conditions  of the  Lease  Agreement  and  attachments,  addenda  and
exhibits thereto, shall be unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.



LANDLORD:                                      TENANT:

James M. Roswell d/b/a                         Biopool International, Inc. d/b/a
Burbank East Business Park                     Xtrana, Inc.


By: /s/ James M. Roswell                       By: /s/ Timothy J. Dahltorp
   ----------------------------                   ------------------------------
        James M. Roswell                               Timothy J. Dahltorp
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 12, 2004                        Date: February 12, 2004
§ 1582.113 Security training program general requirements. ( a ) *Security training program required.* Each owner/operator identified in § 1582.101 of this part is required to adopt and carry out a security training program under this subpart.
( b ) *General requirements.* The security training program must include the following information: ( 1 ) Name of owner/operator.
( 2 ) Name, title, telephone number, and email address of the primary individual to be contacted with regard to review of the security training program.
( 3 ) Number, by specific job function category identified in Appendix B to this part, of security-sensitive employees trained or to be trained.
( 4 ) Implementation schedule that identifies a specific date by which initial and recurrent security training required by § 1570.111 of this subchapter will be completed.
( 5 ) Location where training program records will be maintained.
( 6 ) Curriculum or lesson plan, including learning objectives and method of delivery (such as instructor-led or computer-based training) for each course used to meet the requirements of § 1582.115 of this part. TSA may request additional information regarding the curriculum during the review and approval process. If recurrent training under § 1570.111 of this subchapter is not the same as initial training, a curriculum or lesson plan for the recurrent training will need to be submitted and approved by TSA.
( 7 ) Plan for ensuring supervision of untrained security-sensitive employees performing functions identified in Appendix B to this part.
( 8 ) Plan for notifying employees of changes to security measures that could change information provided in previously provided training.
( 9 ) Method(s) for evaluating the effectiveness of the security training program in each area required by § 1582.115 of this part.
( c ) *Relation to other training.* ( 1 ) Training conducted by owner/operators to comply other requirements or standards, such as emergency preparedness training required by the Department of Transportation (DOT) (49 CFR part 239) or other training for communicating with emergency responders to arrange the evacuation of passengers, may be combined with and used to satisfy elements of the training requirements in this subpart.
( 2 ) If the owner/operator submits a security training program that relies on pre-existing or previous training materials to meet the requirements of subpart B, the program submitted for approval must include an index, organized in the same sequence as the requirements in this subpart.
( d ) *Submission and implementation.* The owner/operator must submit and implement the security training program in accordance with the schedules identified in §§ 1570.109 and 1570.111 of this subchapter.