alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EDWARD C. HUFFMAN,

Petitioner, Civil Action No. 15-CV-12728

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

PAUL KLEE,

Respondent.

_______________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

State prisoner Edward C. Huffman has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition

challenging his plea-based conviction for possession of methamphetamine. Petitioner alleges that

he was sentenced on March 3, 2014, to imprisonment for eighteen months to ten years. As grounds

for habeas relief, petitioner asserts that (1) the trial court erred when it concluded he did not have

an agreement with the police; (2) his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to file a motion to

determine what the police promised him; and (3) this Court has discretion to grant a wide variety

of remedies, including re-sentencing, if the Court determines that the police promised not to file

charges against petitioner in exchange for his cooperation. 

Presently before the Court is petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. 

Petitioner states that he has been unable to retain counsel, that his imprisonment limits his ability

to research and litigate his claims, and that he has limited knowledge of the law. 

Prisoners have no constitutional right to appointment of counsel in a collateral attack

on their convictions. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987). “[T]he right to

appointed counsel extends to the first appeal of right, and no further.” Id. Appointment of counsel

2:15-cv-12728-BAF-DRG Doc # 10 Filed 02/11/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 81
in a civil case such as this one “is justified only in exceptional circumstances.” Lanier v. Bryant,

332 F.3d 999, 1006 (6th Cir. 2003). When determining whether exceptional circumstances exist,

“courts typically consider ‘the type of case and the ability of the plaintiff to represent himself.’” Id.

(quoting Archie v. Christian, 812 F.2d 250, 253 (5th Cir. 1987)). 

Petitioner has ably represented himself thus far, and, contrary to what he alleges, the

issues are not complex. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (docket entry

8) is denied.

S/Bernard A. Friedman 

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 11, 2016

Detroit, Michigan

2

2:15-cv-12728-BAF-DRG Doc # 10 Filed 02/11/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 82
§ 174.82 General requirements for the handling of placarded rail cars, transport vehicles, freight containers, and bulk packages. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified, this subpart does not apply to the handling of rail cars, transport vehicles, freight containers, or bulk packagings, which contain Division 1.6, combustible liquids, Division 6.1 PG III materials, or Class 9 materials.
( b ) A placarded rail car, transport vehicle, freight container, or bulk package may not be transported in a passenger train.
[Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52680, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66281, Dec. 20, 1991; 57 FR 45464, Oct. 1, 1992; Amdt. 174-74, 58 FR 51533, Oct. 1, 1993; 87 FR 79783, Dec. 27, 2022]
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

29–011 2012

112th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–152 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO IRAN 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT 

TO IRAN ORIGINALLY DECLARED ON NOVEMBER 14, 1979, BY 

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12170, IS TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT BEYOND 

NOVEMBER 14, 2012, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d) 

NOVEMBER 9, 2012.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 9, 2012. 

The Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of 

a national emergency unless, within the 90-day period prior to the 

anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the 

Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating 

that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary 

date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to the Federal 

Register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency with respect to Iran that was declared in Executive Order 12170 of November 14, 1979, is to continue in effect beyond November 14, 2012. 

Our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the 

process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 

19, 1981, is still under way. For these reasons, I have determined 

that it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared on 

November 14, 1979, with respect to Iran, beyond November 14, 

2012. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

IRAN

On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President 

declared a national emergency with respect to Iran and, pursuant 

to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 

1701–1706), took related steps to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the situation in Iran. Because our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and 

the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 1981, is still under way, the national emergency declared 

on November 14, 1979, must continue in effect beyond November 

14, 2012. Therefore, consistent with section 202(d), I am continuing 

for 1 year this national emergency with respect to Iran. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 9, 2012. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending June 26, 2010

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|NEW CENTURY BANK DBA CUSTOMERS 1ST BANK | * Branch       | New Century Bank, doing business as Customers 1st Bank, Phoenixville, PA, to establish a branch office at 1015 Penn Ave., Wyomissing, PA. | Newspaper:07/03/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                              | 07/03/2010    
|Federal Register:                       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: janetsjewels@roadrunner.com [mailto:janetsjewels@roadrunner.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

janet Abrams 

1019 Turnstone Road 

Carlsbad, CA 92011
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending August 15, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|TEXAS FIRST BANK  | * 18C* Branch  | Texas First Bank, Texas City, Texas, to merge with affiliate Texas First Bank-Winnie, Winnie, Texas,  and to establish branches at the following locations:  210 Highway 124, Winnie, Texas 77665; 519 Rollingbrook Drive, Baytown, Texas 77521; and Highway 124 and F.M. 365, Fannett, Texas 77705. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: rzavarella@roadrunner.com [mailto:rzavarella@roadrunner.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rosanna Zavarella 

5035 Mayfield rd. 

Lyndhurst, OH 44124
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28776]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

 Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0025]

Notice of Request for Reinstatement of Previously Approved 
Information Collection

ACTION: Notice; Correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Department published a 60-Day notice on 
February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5369) and a subsequent notice (``30-Day 
notice'') on June 25, 2010 (75 FR 36463). As noted in both notices, the 
Department incorrectly estimated a total of 1,057 respondents and 
annual burden of 1,311,000 hours. The Department also provided the 
incorrect address for which the public should request further 
information related to the relevant Information Collection Request. The 
Department is correcting the documents as set forth below.

Correction

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Ashby, Office of the 
Secretary, Office of Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and 
Enforcement, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9310 (voice) (202) 366-9313 (fax) or at 
bob.ashby@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Number of Respondents: 1,250.
    Frequency of Response: Once/twice a year.
    Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 9,000 hours.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 10, 2010.
Patricia Lawton,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28776 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

T

orq

u

e [lb-f

t]

Engine Speed [rpm]

Nominal Torque Curve Discrete Mapping Process
6.7L ISBe5 225B

Nominal Torque Curve

Speed Torque

[rpm] [lb-ft] Test Speed Points

700 501 2300 Predicted fntest 1 665

800 501 665 95% Warm Idle Speed 2 782

900 501 2070 90% Predicted fntest 3 899

1000 501 2530 110% Predicted fntest 4 1016

1100 627 46 2% of fntest 5 1133

1200 627 6 1250

1300 627 7 1368

1400 627 8 1485

1500 627 9 1602

1600 627 10 1719

1700 627 11 1836

1800 627 12 1953

1900 603 13 2070

2000 579 14 2116

2100 555 15 2162

2200 529 16 2208

2300 507 17 2254

2400 454 18 2300

2500 302 19 2346

2600 151 20 2392

2700 0 21 2438

2800 0 22 2484

2900 0 23 2530

3000 0 24 2647

25 2764

26 2881

27 2998

28 3115
Speed Torque Power

[rpm] [lb-ft] [hp] N norm P norm nSpd^2+nPwr^2

665 432 54.7 0.308 0.243 0.153835

782 489 72.8 0.362 0.324 0.235767

899 489 83.7 0.416 0.372 0.311594

1016 509 98.5 0.470 0.438 0.412762

1133 621 134.0 0.524 0.596 0.629890

1250 627 149.2 0.578 0.664 0.775096

1368 628 163.6 0.633 0.728 0.930026

1485 630 178.1 0.687 0.793 1.099895

1602 628 191.6 0.741 0.852 1.275405

1719 628 205.5 0.795 0.915 1.468503

1836 619 216.4 0.849 0.963 1.648058

1953 584 217.2 0.903 0.966 1.749547

2070 558 219.9 0.957 0.978 1.874146

2116 550 221.6 0.979 0.986 1.929886

2162 546 224.8 1.000 1.000 2.000000

2208 529 222.4 1.021 0.989 2.022074

2254 516 221.5 1.043 0.985 2.057674

2300 494 216.3 1.064 0.963 2.058164

2346 477 213.1 1.085 0.948 2.076117

2392 451 205.4 1.106 0.914 2.059261

2438 373 173.1 1.128 0.770 1.865072

2484 300 141.9 1.149 0.631 1.718573

2530 250 120.4 1.170 0.536 1.656492

2647 47 23.7 1.224 0.105 1.510090

N pmax Pmax

2162 224.8 2.076117

New fntest 2346 rpm
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biovest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas F. Belleau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                  /s/ Thomas F. Belleau
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Thomas F. Belleau
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  June 5, 2003
Exhibit 31.1



I, Kenneth T. Neilson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QA of Hudson United Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting: and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2004                           
|                                               
|/s/ KENNETH T. NEILSON                         
|Kenneth T. Neilson                             
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



26
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.66 Requirements for bulk packagings of certain explosives and oxidizers. When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a hazardous material may be transported in accordance with this section (per special provision 148 in § 172.102(c)(1)), only the bulk packagings specified for these materials in IME Standard 23 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter) are authorized, subject to the requirements of subparts A and B of this part and the special provisions in column 7 of the § 172.101 table. See Section I of IME Standard 23 for the standards for transporting a single bulk hazardous material for blasting by cargo tank motor vehicles (CTMV), and Section II of IME Standard 23 for the standards for CTMVs capable of transporting multiple hazardous materials for blasting in bulk and non-bulk packagings (*i.e.,* a multipurpose bulk truck (MBT) authorized to transport the Class 1 (explosive) materials, Division 5.1 (oxidizing) materials, Class 8 (corrosive) materials, and Combustible Liquid, n.o.s., NA1993, III, as specified in IME Standard 23 (also see § 177.835(d) of this subchapter)). In addition, the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section apply to: A new multipurpose bulk truck constructed after April 19, 2016; and a modified existing multipurpose bulk truck after April 19, 2016 (see § 173.66(b) regarding the term *modified*). ( a ) *Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS).* Multipurpose bulk trucks must be in compliance with the FMVSS found in 49 CFR part 571, as applicable. Furthermore, the multipurpose bulk truck manufacturer must maintain a certification record ensuring the final manufacturing is in compliance with the FMVSS, in accordance with the certification requirements found in 49 CFR part 567. These certification records must be made available to DOT representatives upon request.
( b ) *Modified.* The term *modified* means any change to the original design and construction of a multipurpose bulk truck (MBT) that affects its structural integrity or lading retention capability, (*e.g.* rechassising, etc.). Excluded from this category are the following: ( 1 ) A change to the MBT equipment such as lights, truck or tractor power train components, steering and brake systems, and suspension parts, and changes to appurtenances, such as fender attachments, lighting brackets, ladder brackets; and
( 2 ) Replacement of components such as valves, vents, and fittings with a component of a similar design and of the same size.
[80 FR 79453, Dec. 21, 2015]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.25 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 2020]
[Page 1139]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.25  providing for the consideration of h.r. 2020

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-190) the resolution (H. Res. 190) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2020) making appropriations for the 
Treasury Department, the United States Postal Service, the Executive 
Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```