alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00083-CR

____________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

PHILLIP EDWARD NORWOOD, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-01-00746 CR 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

The State of Texas has appealed the trial court’s order dismissing an 

indictment for failing to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. See Tex. 

Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (West Supp. 2014). On March 5, 2015, the 

trial court granted a motion to withdraw filed by counsel for the Appellee, Phillip 

Edward Norwood. Norwood asserts that he is indigent and requests appointment of 

counsel. “A defendant in a criminal matter is entitled to be represented by counsel 

in an adversarial judicial proceeding.” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 1.051(a) 

(West Supp. 2014). An indigent defendant is entitled to have an attorney appointed 
2

to represent him in any adversary judicial proceeding, including an appeal. Id. art.

1.051(c), (d)(1). Matters concerning the appointment of counsel should be 

addressed by the trial court in the first instance. See generally Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(a) (West Supp. 2014). 

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the case is remanded to the trial court for a 

hearing to determine whether the Appellee is indigent. See id. art. 1.051(m) - (o).

If the Appellee is not represented by retained counsel, is not financially able to 

employ counsel, and requests that counsel be appointed, then the trial court shall 

appoint counsel to represent the Appellee for the appeal unless he elects to proceed 

pro se, in which case the trial court shall determine whether Appellee’s decision is 

knowingly and intelligently made. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 836, 95 

S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.E.2d 562 (1975); East v. State, 48 S.W.3d 412 (Tex. App.–

Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.). The supplemental clerk’s record containing 

any orders and findings made by the trial court and a reporter’s record of any 

hearings conducted pursuant to this Order shall be filed with the Court of Appeals 

by June 29, 2015. The appeal is abated and all appellate timetables are suspended 

while the case is in the trial court.

ORDER ENTERED May 28, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 39384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: North Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee, Kamiah, ID, 
USDA, Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Deterimination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Nez Perce and 
Clearwater National Forests' North Central Idaho Resource Advisory 
Committee will meet Tuesday, July 24, 2007 in Grangeville, Idaho for a 
business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on July 24 will be held 
at the Super 8 Motel in Grangeville, Idaho, beginning at 10 a.m. (PST). 
Agenda topics will include discussion of potential projects. A public 
forum will begin at 2:30 p.m. (PST).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ihor Mereszczak, Staff Officer and 
Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 935-2513.

    Dated: July 10, 2007.
Ihor Mereszczak,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-3477 Filed 7-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 171

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 171 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 171.14 [Reserved]
#### § 179.400-24 Stamping.

(a) A tank that complies with all specification requirements must have the following information plainly and permanently stamped into the metal near the center of the head of the outer jacket at the “B” end of the car, in letters and figures at least 3⁄8-inch high, in the following order:

| | Example of required stamping |
| --- | --- |
| Specification | DOT-113A60W. |
| Design service temperature | Minus 423 °F. |
| Inner tank | Inner Tank. |
| Material | ASTM A240-304. |
| Shell thickness | Shell 3/16 inch. |
| Head thickness | Head 3/16 inch. |
| Inside diameter | ID 107 inch. |
| Inner tank builder's initials | ABC. |
| Date of original test (month and year) and initials of person conducting original test | 00-0000GHK. |
| Water capacity | 00000 lbs. |
| Outer jacket | Outer jacket. |
| Material | ASTM A515-70. |
| Outer jacket builder's initials | DEF. |
| Car assembler's initials (if other than inner tank or outer jacket builder) | XYZ. |

(b) Any stamping on the shell or heads of the inner tank is prohibited.

(c) In lieu of the stamping required by paragraph (a) of this section, the specified markings may be incorporated on a data plate of corrosion-resistant metal, fillet welded in place on the head of the outer jacket at the “B” end of the car.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 29, 1995 (89), Para 89.36 Adjournment]
[Page 1086]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.89.36  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana, at 11 o'clock and 42 minutes 
p.m., the House adjourned.
```
§ 96.07-10 Lakes, bays, and sounds, or river service. ( a ) Vessels in lakes, bays, and sounds, or river service shall be fitted with such ground tackle and hawsers as deemed necessary by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, depending upon the size of the vessel and the waters on which it operates.
#### I. Golden v. The State.

*No. 479.*

*Decided February 16.*

1. Disorderly House—Liability of Tenant.—Where appellant was the tenant of a certain house, at which malt liquor was kept and sold by him, and lewd women, or women of bad repute for chastity, were permitted to display and conduct themselves in said house in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner, *Held,*he was guilty of keeping a disorderly house.

*2.*Same—Evidence; Admissibility of.—Evidence that women who visited the house were.of bad reputation for chastity was both competent and admissible, made so by the very terms of the statute defining the offense. Evidence as to the reputation of the house was also competent. Such is the settled rule.

Appeal from the County Court of Navarro. Tried below before Hon. John H. Bice, County Judge.

No statement necessary.

*Lee & Scott,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

HURT, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was had for a violation of the terms of article 341a of the Penal Code, prohibiting the keeping of disorderly houses. Appellant was the tenant of a certain house, at which malt liquor was kept for sale and sold by him. If he permitted lewd women, or women of bad reputation for chastity, to display or conduct themselves in said house in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner, he was guilty of keeping a disorderly house. He objected to evidence that women who visited his house were of bad reputation for chastity. This evidence was clearly admissible, made so by the very terms of the statute defining the offense.

Nor did the court err in admitting evidence as to the reputation of his house; this testimony was competent. Such is the settled rule.

The record discloses, that lewd women and women of bad reputation for chastity were permitted to conduct themselves in an indecent manner in said house. Both black and white prostitutes and women of bad reputation for chastity were permitted to assemble at his house, get drunk, and fight with each other. This conduct was repeated and sustained, so much so that it attracted the attention of the neighbors. When this indictment was presented this conduct ceased.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1365

JONATHAN BOONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(2:05-cv-01914-DCN)

Submitted: October 4, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;

Pamela M. Wood, Assistant Regional Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Boone appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and

dismissing Boone’s complaint requesting review of the Commissioner

of Social Security’s decision that he was not disabled for failure

to prosecute. A plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or to comply with

the federal procedural rules or an order of the court may warrant

involuntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This court reviews

a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of

discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir.

1989). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) by Alpha
      Innotech Corp. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certify that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.




Dated:
                March 30, 2007/s/
                Ronald BissingerRonald
                BissingerChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                Officer)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 9, 1995 (77), Para 77.8 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 888]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.77.8  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 863: Ms. Danner.
       H.R. 1496: Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Bryant of Texas, Mr. Wolf, 
     Mr. Towns, Mr. Miller of California, and Mr. DeFazio.
       H.R. 1594: Mr. Kolbe and Mr. Chambliss.
```
#### George F. Gantz, *Respondent, v.*John W. Holgate, Appellant.—

Order reversed and attachment vacated, without costs.
**Exhibit** **32.2**
 
 **HARLEYSVILLE
        NATIONAL CORPORATION**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 **PRINCIPAL
        FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Harleysville National Corporation (the "Corporation")
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, George S.
        Rapp,
        Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  To
        my
        knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Corporation as of and for the period covered by the Report.
 
 
 
 /s/
        George S. Rapp
 George
        S.
        Rapp
 Executive
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Harleysville
        National Corporation
 
 Date:
        November 8, 2006
 
 
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Harleysville National Corporation and
        will
        be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THERAPY LASERS, INC. AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2000 AND FOR THE TWO YEARS
THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                 MAR-01-1999
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                 891
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       891
<PP&E>                               1,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      (1,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               28,543
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            11,303
<OTHER-SE>                         (38,955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           891
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         0
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    18,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (19,317)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (19,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       (19,317)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### George W. Moak, *as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v.*Nathan S. Hayes, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed on opinion of

Merwin, J.,

at Special Term.
#### § 179.200-3 Type.

Tank built under these specifications must be circular in cross section, with formed heads designed convex outward. When specified in § 179.201-1, the tank must have at least one manway or one expansion dome with manway, and such other external projections as are prescribed herein. When the tank is divided into compartments, each compartment must be treated as a separate tank.

[Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21348, Nov. 6, 1971]
-----Original Message----- 

From: abonadea@comcast.net [mailto:abonadea@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

audré bonadea 

505 Division St NW apt 5 

olympia, WA 98502
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A No. 2
of China International Tourism Holdings Ltd (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Wang, Xiao Jun, our Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 CHINA
      INTERNATIONAL TOURISM HOLDINGS LTD
                (Registrant)Date:  September
      2 , 2008
              By:
              /s/ Wang, Xiao
      JunWang,
      Xiao Jun
                Chief
      Financial Officer
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 16, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce     
|Alan M. Pearce         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 1182.6 Processing an opposed application. ( a ) If timely comments are submitted in opposition to an application, the tentative grant of authority is void.
( b ) Applicants may file a reply to opposing comments, within 60 days after the date the application was published. ( 1 ) The reply may include a request for an expedited decision on the issues raised by the comments. Otherwise, the reply may not contain any new evidence, but shall only rebut or further explain matters previously raised.
( 2 ) The reply shall be verified, as provided in 49 CFR 1182.8(e), unless it consists strictly of legal argument.
( 3 ) Applicants' reply must be served on each commenter in such manner that it is received no later than the date it is due to be filed with the Board.
( 4 ) Opposing commenters may reply to a request for an expedited decision, within 70 days after notice of the application was published.
( c ) The Board may: ( 1 ) Dispense with further proceedings and make a final determination based on the record as developed; or
( 2 ) Issue a procedural schedule specifying the dates by which: applicants may submit additional evidence in support of the application, in response to the comment(s) in opposition; and the opposing commenter(s) may reply.
( d ) Further processing of an opposed application will be handled on a case-by-case basis, as appropriate to the particular issues raised in the comments filed in opposition to the application. Evidentiary proceedings must be concluded within 240 days after publication of the notice of the application.
Dear Sir or Madam,

Stephenson Construction Management, LLC is petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration to amend Exemption No. 11536 to Regulatory Docket No. FAA - 2015 - 0 401 to add the following aircraft: Zeta Science Buffalo FX - 79 This aircraft is a fixed wing, single electric motor and propeller, small UAS designed for image data collection. Ross L. Stephenson, Jr. Stephenson Construction Management, LLC Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0629(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0629(02)

**List of appropriate certificates recognised under the procedure laid down in Article 18, paragraph 3 of Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Situation on 22 May 2002) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 155 , 29/06/2002 P. 0011 - 0014 *

List of appropriate certificates recognised under the procedure laid down in Article 18, paragraph 3 of Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers(1)

(Situation on 22 May 2002)

(2002/C 155/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

>TABLE>

(1) The Netherlands and the United Kingdom did not proceed with the recognition of individual maritime education and training institutes and opted for the recognition of all the maritime education and training institutes approved by the third countries concerned.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ANEESAH TAYLOR,

Respondent

v.

IMANUEL MESIAH A/K/A MICHAEL BANKOFF,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 58 EAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of April, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
|                                                         | 900 North Federal Highway, Suite 160 |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                         | Boca Raton, FL 33432-2754            |
|                                                         | Tel: (561) 395-0330                  |
|                                                         | Fax: (561) 395-2081                  |
| **GRASSANO ACCOUNTING, P.A.**                           |                                      |
| Certified Public Accountants & Business Consultants |                                      |
|                                                    |                                      |
|                                                    |                                      |
| Vector Holdings Corporation                             |                                      |
| P.O. Box 800303                                         |                                      |
| Aventura, FL 33280                                      | October 25, 2000                     |
|                                                    |                                      |
| Re: Consent to include audit report in Form 10-KSB      |                                      |
|                                                    |                                      |
| Gentlemen:                                              |                                      |