alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATE OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  I, Matthew Skidell, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Gottaplay Interactive, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gottaplay Interactive, Inc and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls.  Date: January 09, 2009  /s/ Matthew Skidell Name: Matthew Skidell Titles: Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.322 Ethyl chloride. Ethyl chloride must be packaged in any of the following single or combination non-bulk packagings which meet Packing Group I performance level requirements: ( a ) In 4C1, 4C2, 4D or 4F wooden boxes with glass, earthenware, or metal inner receptacles not over 500 g (17.6 ounces) capacity each;
( b ) In 4G fiberboard boxes with glass, earthenware, or metal inner receptacles not over 500 g (17.6 ounces) capacity each. Outer packagings may not exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight;
( c ) In 1A1 drums of not over 100 L (26 gallons) capacity each; or
( d ) In specification cylinders as prescribed for any compressed gas except acetylene. Cylinders made of aluminum alloy are not authorized.
( e ) In capsules under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The mass of gas must not exceed 150 g (5.30 ounces) per capsule;
( 2 ) The capsule must be free of faults liable to impair its strength;
( 3 ) The leakproofness integrity of the closure must be maintained by a secondary means (*e.g.,* cap, crown, seal, binding, *etc.*) capable of preventing any leakage of the closure while in transportation; and
( 4 ) The capsules must be placed in a strong outer packaging suitable for the contents and may not exceed a gross mass of 75 kg (165 pounds).
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52667, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 74 FR 2266, Jan. 14, 2009; 76 FR 3381, Jan. 19, 2011]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2134

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to allow employees in

classified positions in community colleges to serve in certified or other

academic capacities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1995

Mr. RADANOVICH (for himself, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. CONDIT, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. FILNER, Mr. COX of California, Mr. TORRES, Mr.

DOOLITTLE, Mr. MINETA, Mr. DOOLEY, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. CUNNINGHAM,

Mr. DORNAN, and Ms. LOFGREN) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to allow

employees in classified positions in community colleges

to serve in certified or other academic capacities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OVERTIME EXEMPTION.

4 Section 13(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

5 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:

7 ‘‘(30) any employee who is employed in a classi8 fied position by a community college which provides
2

•HR 2134 IH

1 2 years of undergraduate education leading to an as2 sociate degree or certificate and who, in addition to

3 the employee’s duties as a classified employee,

4 serves, on the employee’s own volition, in a certified

5 or other academic capacity, except that section 7

6 shall apply to such employee’s employment in such

7 classified position if employed in such position for

8 more than 40 hours in a week.’’.

Æ
§ 178.255-4 Closures for manholes and domes. ( a ) The manhole cover shall be designed to provide a secure closure of the manhole. All covers, not hinged to the tanks, shall be attached to the outside of the dome by at least 1 ⁄ 8 inch chain or its equivalent. Closures shall be made tight against leakage of vapor and liquid by use of gaskets of suitable material.
( b ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.145 Valves. ( a ) Except for cast iron and plastic valves, each valve must meet the minimum requirements of API Spec 6D (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7), or to a national or international standard that provides an equivalent performance level. A valve may not be used under operating conditions that exceed the applicable pressure-temperature ratings contained in those requirements.
( b ) Each cast iron and plastic valve must comply with the following: ( 1 ) The valve must have a maximum service pressure rating for temperatures that equal or exceed the maximum service temperature.
( 2 ) The valve must be tested as part of the manufacturing, as follows: ( i ) With the valve in the fully open position, the shell must be tested with no leakage to a pressure at least 1.5 times the maximum service rating.
( ii ) After the shell test, the seat must be tested to a pressure not less than 1.5 times the maximum service pressure rating. Except for swing check valves, test pressure during the seat test must be applied successively on each side of the closed valve with the opposite side open. No visible leakage is permitted.
( iii ) After the last pressure test is completed, the valve must be operated through its full travel to demonstrate freedom from interference.
( c ) Each valve must be able to meet the anticipated operating conditions.
( d ) No valve having shell (body, bonnet, cover, and/or end flange) components made of ductile iron may be used at pressures exceeding 80 percent of the pressure ratings for comparable steel valves at their listed temperature. However, a valve having shell components made of ductile iron may be used at pressures up to 80 percent of the pressure ratings for comparable steel valves at their listed temperature, if: ( 1 ) The temperature-adjusted service pressure does not exceed 1,000 p.s.i. (7 Mpa) gage; and
( 2 ) Welding is not used on any ductile iron component in the fabrication of the valve shells or their assembly.
( e ) No valve having shell (body, bonnet, cover, and/or end flange) components made of cast iron, malleable iron, or ductile iron may be used in the gas pipe components of compressor stations.
( f ) Except for excess flow valves, plastic valves installed after January 22, 2019, must meet the minimum requirements of a listed specification. A valve may not be used under operating conditions that exceed the applicable pressure and temperature ratings contained in the listed specification.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37502, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32894, June 14, 2004; Amdt. 192-114, 75 FR 48603, Aug. 11, 2010; Amdt. 192-119, 80 FR 181, Jan. 5, 2015; Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58717, Nov. 20, 2018; Amdts. 192-135, 195-107, 89 FR 33281, Apr. 29, 2024]
----

  CLECO CORPORATION                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                EXHIBIT32(a)

| Cleco Corporation                              |
|------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO                     |
| 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,                       |
| AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

In connection with the Annual Report of ClecoCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, David M. Eppler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, DilekSamil, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                           |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.  |

| /s/  David M. Eppler                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| David M. EpplerPresident and Chief Executive Officer  |

| /s/  Dilek Samil                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dilek SamilExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  |

----
**EXHIBIT
99.1**
  
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  I,
Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Hydromer, Inc.
  
 
 
 Date:
      November 14, 2005
    By:/s/ Manfred F. DyckManfred F. DyckChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

      CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, Robert Vrooman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of O'Hara
     Resources, Ltd.:

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
     untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
     the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant
     and we have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          quarterly report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluate the effectiveness of the registrant disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
          date of this quarterly report ( the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   present in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
     audit committee of the registrant's board of directors ( or persons
     performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal controls; and



6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
     this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
     internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
     internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
     evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weakness.


     Signature
----------------------------
Robert Vrooman
Chairman and CEO
January 27, 2005
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending June 11, 2011

|Filer                                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|SAVANNAH RIVER FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1         | Savannah River Financial Corporation, Augusta, Georgia, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Savannah River Banking Company, Aiken, South Carolina, upon its conversion to a state non-member bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                           | Not available
|Federal Register:                    | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Sarah E. House, *Respondent, v.*National Bank of Cohoes, *Appellant*.

Order denying motion to dismiss opened, and motion to dismiss appeal .granted, unless appellant pay ten dollars costs ; in which case, case goes over the term.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2066 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2066

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the National School Lunch Act to provide greater flexibility 
   to schools to meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans under the 
              school lunch and school breakfast programs.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2066

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National School Lunch Act to provide greater flexibility 
   to schools to meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans under the 
              school lunch and school breakfast programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthy Meals for Children Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR SCHOOLS TO MEET THE DIETARY 
              GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS UNDER THE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH 
              ACT.

    Section 9(f)(2) of the National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 
1758(f)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(D) Use of any reasonable approach.--
            ``(i) In general.--A school food service authority may use 
        any reasonable approach, within guidelines established by the 
        Secretary in a timely manner, to meet the requirements of this 
        paragraph, including--
                    ``(I) using the school nutrition meal pattern in 
                effect for the 1994-1995 school year; and
                    ``(II) using any of the approaches described in 
                subparagraph (C).
            ``(ii) Nutrient analysis.--The Secretary may not require a 
        school to conduct or use a nutrient analysis to meet the 
        requirements of this paragraph.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: carolandkj@att.net [mailto:carolandkj@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:10 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carol Lapetino 

6441 Loomes Ave. 

Downers Grove, IL 60516
98-207.

#### Tanzi v. Nahigian.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71872. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On March 2, 1998, this court granted appellant’s motion for stay on the ground that Judge Michael Watson of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas stayed all actions pending against insureds of PIE Mutual Insurance Company. On June 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice that Judge Watson had ordered that the stay remain in effect until September 23, 1998. It appearing to the court that the stay granted by Judge Watson has expired,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the stay granted by this court be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellees may file a memorandum in response within thirty days of the date of this entry.
#### § 199.221 Use following an accident.

Each operator shall prohibit a covered employee who has actual knowledge of an accident in which his or her performance of covered functions has not been discounted by the operator as a contributing factor to the accident from using alcohol for eight hours following the accident, unless he or she has been given a post-accident test under § 199.225(a), or the operator has determined that the employee's performance could not have contributed to the accident.
#### Charles Vivian et al., as Copartners under the Firm Name of Charles Vivian and Company, Appellants, *v.*Henry Steers, Jr., Respondent.

Reported below, 136 App. Div. 926.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 21, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action on contract.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence and that no questions of law were presented for review.

*Charles Thaddeus Terry*for motion.

*Willard N. Baylis*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
[Strafford,

June, 1881.]

#### Glidden *v.*Henderson.

*Sanborn*and *Hall,*for the plaintiff.

*Worcester f Gafney,*for the defendant.

Stanley, J.

The evidence to which the defendant objected was laid out of consideration by the instructions given and the question submitted to the jury, to which instructions and question the defendant does not object.

*Judgment on the verdict for the plaintiff.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.