alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix C

Safety Case

The DJI Inspire 1 is a quadcopter developed and produced by DJI Innovations. It weighs 6.8 lbs. 

and is made primarily of carbon tubing and plastic.

The gimbaled camera has the ability to rotate 360° horizontally. To aid in the safety of flight, 

there will be a pilot to operate the flight aspect of the Inspire 1 and to ensure that it maintains an 

appropriate safety distance to people and buildings at all times. There will be another operator to 

control/operate the camera and will focus on what the camera is looking at.
Autopilot

The autopilot system the DJI Inspire 1 uses is the DJI A2 autopilot. The A2 was introduced in 

August of 2013 and has had a very reliable and safe history. They have constantly sought to 

improve the capabilities and safety of the autopilot system to include a function that will not 

allow it to fly too close to airports. This function cannot be overridden and is hard coded into the 

software.

Operations

While the autopilot system supports functions at over 1.5 nautical miles (NM), with the 

exception request being sought by Celestial Imaging, all flight operations will be within 1/4 NM 

of the pilot. This will allow line of sight operations in an extremely safe manner. It will allow 

for the pilot-in-command to maneuver the UAV in any needed manner to maintain a safe 

distance from other aircraft or people that may come within the safety envelope established 

before flight.

Along with the NOTAM filed 72 hours before operations, the PIC will also have a hand held 

radio to maintain contact with the closest ATC tower. If there is an airport in the area that is not 

towered, then the radio will be tuned to the appropriate CTAF. It will be monitored 30 minutes 

before flight operations begin with warning calls that operations will begin at 15 min, 10 min, 5 

min, and one minute intervals.

All flights will be conducted at or under 400 feet above ground level (AGL). If there are any 

manned aircraft within 3 NM, either operations will cease or if in contact with ATC, all 

operations will be conducted at 100 feet AGL with approval from local ATC. If there is manned 

activity with line of site of anyone associated with operations, all operations will cease until 10 

minutes after the last siting of any manned aircraft. Once the airspace is clear of manned 

aircraft, operations will continue with coordination from local ATC.
§ 71.50-21 Preliminary examination requirements. ( a ) If you exclusively use divers to examine the underwater hull plating, you must arrange to have a preliminary examination conducted by a third party examiner, with the assistance of qualified divers. The purpose of the preliminary examination is to assess the overall condition of the vessel's hull and identify any specific concerns to be addressed during the underwater hull examination.
( b ) The preliminary examination is required only upon the vessel's entry or reentry into the AHE program.
( c ) If you use an underwater ROV as the predominant means to examine your vessel's hull plating, a preliminary examination and the participation of a third party examiner will not be necessary.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21078, Apr. 29, 2002]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President  Finance and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 24, 2006
#### John J. Casey, as Administrator of the Estate of Anna L. Casey, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The Davis & Furber Machine Company, Respondent.

*Casey*v. *Davis & Furber Machine Co.,*138 App. Div. 396, appeal withdrawn.

(Submitted December 12, 1910;

decided December 16, 1910.)

Motion for leave to withdraw appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 16, 1910, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for *555personal injuries alleged to have been sustainéd through defendant’s negligence.

The motion was made upon the ground that the order of reversal was silent as to whether it was based upon the law or the facts.

*Clarence Z. Spriggs*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted on payment, within twenty days, of costs up to date, and ten dollars costs of motion. Upon failure to make such payment the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### Robert H. Parks, *Appellant, v.*John M. Hughes, *Respondent,*Impleaded, *etc.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
-----Original Message----- 

From: rickfaiella@hotmail.com [mailto:rickfaiella@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rick Faiella 

127 South Sixth St. 

Warner Robins, GA 31088
From: Christine@Stillwatersci.com [mailto:Christine@Stillwatersci.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christine Champe 

916 13th St 

Arcata, CA 95521
§ 17.1 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982, and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on state processes and on state, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of the Department, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the Department or its officers.
From: joann_porter@msn.com [mailto:joann_porter@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Before I retired, I was the CPA for a counseling center. Mental 

illness or substance abuse are illness, plan and simple. To allow 

insurance companies to treat them differently is just plain wrong. 

Please do not allow them to do this. 

Sincerely, 

JoAnn Porter 

1110 SE Sunnymead Way 

Pullman, WA 99163
§ 1325.2 Credit agreements. ( a ) All agreements to extend credit to candidates for Federal office or their representatives by persons subject to regulation by the Surface Transportation Board ( 1 ) must be in writing,
( 2 ) must contain a detailed description of the deposit, bond, collateral, or other means of security, used to secure payment of the debt, and
( 3 ) must be signed by all parties to the agreement. A copy of each such agreement must be filed with this Board's Bureau of Operations in Washington, DC, within 20 days of the date of its execution.
( b ) [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                THE RANDERS GROUP INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE



Primary Earnings Per Share

     Net income per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average
number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during each
period.  The number of shares used in computing net income per share for each
of the three years included herein are as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Weighted Average
             Weighted Average        Number of Common
             Number of Common        Equivalent Shares
Year        Shares Outstanding          Outstanding                  Total
----      ---------------------     ----------------------          --------
<S>             <C>                       <C>                      <C>
1996            14,115,682                 --                      14,115,682
1995            14,115,682                 --                      14,115,682
1994            14,114,924                 --                      14,114,924

</TABLE>

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share

     The Company's outstanding stock options are exercisable at prices which
are at or in excess of the market price.  Under the treasury stock method of
computing fully diluted earnings per share, the calculation of earnings per
share based upon the exercise of the stock options would be antidilutive (would
result in increased earnings per share).
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Arizona Land Income  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Thomas R. Hislop, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Thomas R. Hislop
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas R. Hislop
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Arizona Land Income Corporation
                                        March 28, 2003
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 24, 1995 (100), Para 100.9 Recess--4:23 P.M.]
[Page 1179]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.100.9  recess--4:23 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNNING, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 4 o'clock and 23 minutes p.m., until 
5:00 p.m.
```
98-2697.

#### Bratton v. Stores.

Portage App. No. 98-P-0068. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right.- In lieu of payment of the filing fee required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV, appellant filed a statement in which she asserts that she is “unable to pay court costs.” Appellant’s statement is not confirmed by oath or affirmation. Furthermore, appellant’s purported affidavit does not contain the jurat of a notary public or other official authorized to administer an oath or affirmation.

S.Ct.Prac.R. XV requires that the docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 be paid before an appeal is docketed. Section 3 of the rule permits an affidavit of indigency to be filed in lieu of docket fees. The rule further provides that the court may review and determine the sufficiency of an affidavit at any stage in the proceeding.

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3), the court determines that, whereas appellant’s statement is not confirmed by oath or affirmation and is not properly notarized, it does not meet the requirements of an affidavit of indigency under S.Ct.Prac.R. XV and therefore is not sufficient for waiver of the docket fee. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.8 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Pages 1042-1043]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.8  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. BOEHNER, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule today: the Committee on Banking and Financial 
Services, the Committee on Commerce, the Committee on Economic and 
Educational Opportunities, the Committee on Government Reform and 
Oversight, the Committee on International Relations, the Committee on 
Resources, the Committee on Science, the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

[[Page 1043]]
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets as of February 28, 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of operations for the three months then ended and is qualified in its
entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                           2,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      307
<ALLOWANCES>                                       211
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             285
<DEPRECIATION>                                     277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,215
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,676)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,704
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,857
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (10)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,691
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.43
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO , IL 60604-3590 

# AU G 2 7 

# 2013 Cheri Budzynski Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP 1

000 Jackson Street Toledo , Ohio 43604-5573 Dear Ms. Budzynski : REPLY TO THE ATIENTION OF:

Thank you for your letter dated May 7, 2013, petitioning the U
. S. Environmen tal Protection Agency to solicit public comment on our action published in the Federal Register on April3, 2013. The rulemaking ofApril3, 2013 clarified the proper codification of a 201 0 action consolidating Ambient Air Quality Standards under the Ohio state implementation plan
. Although we do not believe that notice and comment rulemaking is required for this action, under the specific circumstances of this matter, the Regional Administrator has decided to grant your petition for reconsideration. EPA will initiate a notice and comment rulemaking pursuant to Section 110(k)(6)
. We will then welcome any comments you may have on the codification. I am copying Rob Brubaker, ofPorter Wright, because he sent us similar comments . I am also copying the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, given their interest in this matter. Please feel free to call Andre Daugavietis, ofour Office ofRegional Counsel , at 312-886-6663, ifyou have any questions. Sincerely, 

# j2oH-fiJ**t~** Robert Kaplan Regional Counsel, Region 5

R

ecycled/Recyclable • P rinted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (100% Post-Consumer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2005 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2005

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections 
       in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 1995

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections 
       in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall, before the 
end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, make such corrections to the map described in subsection (b) as 
are necessary--
            (1) to move on that map the eastern boundary of the 
        excluded area covering Ocean Beach, Seaview, Ocean Bay Park, 
        and part of Point O'Woods to the western boundary of the Sunken 
        Forest Preserve; and
            (2) to ensure that on that map the depiction of areas as 
        ``otherwise protected areas'' does not include any area that is 
        owned by the Point O'Woods Association (a privately held 
        corporation under the laws of the State of New York).
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'', dated October 24, 1990, that relates to the unit of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled Fire Island Unit NY-59P.
                                 <all>
```
-'^--o 

l-j j 

fr: 

O 

m 

.-^"S 

MAYOR CITY COUNCIL 

Chuck Jordan Tommy Benson, III, Ward 1 

Lois Hawkins, Ward 2 

Carolyn Weathers, Ward 3 

Betty J. Watkins, Ward 4 

Ann Hollo well, Ward 5 

Errick D. Simmons, Ward 6 

340 Main St. • P. 0. Box 897 > GreenviUe, Mississippi 38701 • Telephone: 662-378-1501 • Facsimile: 662-378-0276 • Email: cjordan@www.greenville.ms.us 

February 22, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 ^ 

CD 

RE: Mid Delta Regional (GLH) 

Docket DOT-OST-2008-0209 

Mr. DeVany: 

We have reviewed the EAS proposals submitted under Docket DOT-OST-2008-0209. We have determined that 

currently, all bids do not meet the statutory requirements. 

Additionally, the proposed level of service will be at a great disadvantage for any airline and our airport without support 

from Delta Airlines, through some form of codeshare and joint ticket pricing, allowing passengers to easily flow through 

the national airports system. 

We appreciate the interest of these airlines, but do not endorse or support these proposals for subsidized essential air 

service to the community of Greenville, MS. 

We request that the hold-in order that prohibited Mesaba & Pinnacle Airlines dba Delta Connection from terminating 

scheduled airline service to GreenviUe, MS remain in effect until further notice, or until such time as a suitable 

replacement which satisfies the community's needs can be found. 

We would like to thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. 

Respectfully, 

Mayor Chuck Jordan 

City of Greenville, Mississippi
**Exhibit99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

This certification is being delivered pursuant to the requirements ofSection 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and CriminalProcedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any personfor any other purpose.

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of SchererHealthcare, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”) for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which accompanies this Certificate,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2002. |                                             |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                             |
|                           |                                             |
|                           |                                             |
|                           | /s/ Robert P. Scherer, Jr.                       |
|                           | Robert P. Scherer, Jr.                           |
|                           | Chairman, Chief Executive  Officer and President |

 

----