alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 39801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Intent To Grant an Exclusive License of a U.S. Government-Owned 
Patent

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------N
otice.

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), 
announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-
bearing, revocable license within the geographic area of the United 
States of America and its territories and possessions to U.S. Patent 
application 11/229,425, filed September 16, 2005 entitled ``Artillery 
Rocket Trajectory Correction Kit,'' to Diehl BGT Defense GmbH & Co. KG 
with its principal place of business at Massberg Facility Alte 
Nussdorfer Strausse 13 88662 Uberlingen, Germany.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering 
Command, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg. 5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 
35898-5000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Russ Alexander, Officer of 
Research & Technology Applications, (256) 876-8743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Artillery Rocket Trajectory Correction 
Kit (TCK) is a completely self-contained retrofit kit that is 
externally and fixedly mounted as an add-on to the rear (aft of the 
tailfins) of an existing, unguided rocket. The TCK continuously 
measures the pitch and yaw of the rocket during the initial seconds of 
the flight as it is released from the launch tube. A trajectory 
correction is calculated to allow the rocket to stay on a desired path. 
Selected thrusters are then activated to make any necessary flight 
correction. The thrusters are positioned around the circumference of 
the rocket body so as to correctively steer the rocket. Thus, rocket 
accuracy is improved and collateral damage is reduced.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3537 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending July 27, 2013

|Filer             | Filing Type                      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|DELANCO, MHC      | * SLHC Formation* MHC Conversion | Delanco, MHC, Delanco, NJ, proposes to convert to stock form and merge with and into Delanco Bancorp, Inc., Delanco, New Jersey, which proposes to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring Delanco Federal Savings Bank, Delanco, NJ. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/15/2013
|Newspaper:        | Not available                   
|Federal Register: | 07/15/2013                      

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                       | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST NORTHERN B&TC, PALMERTON, PENNSYLVANIA | 186717 | 02/25/2013 | 07/18/2013     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John H. Castle, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2004

| | /s/ John H. Castle                     
| | ---------------------------------------
| | John H. Castle,
Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing except to the extent the registrant specifically and expressly incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                     [Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Letterhead]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-73954, 333-27761, 333-58466, and 333-76940 of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on
Form S-8 and on Registration Statement No. 333-58468 of Nam Tai Electronics,
Inc. on Form F-3, of our report dated March 15, 2002, appearing in this Annual
Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F/A of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
----------------------------

Hong Kong
June 10, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending May 30, 2009

----

EnforcementAffinity Bank Holding, Inc., Ventura, California  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, May 29, 2009 					Community Bancorp, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Community Bank of Nevada  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Nevada Financial Institutions Division.					-Announced, May 27, 2009 					Neighborhood Community Bank, Newnan, Georgia  -- issuance of a consent prompt corrective action directive.					-Announced, May 28, 2009 					W Holding Company, Inc., Mayaguez, Puerto Rico  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.					-Announced, May 29, 2009 					

Extensions Of TimeBNP Paribas, Paris, France  -- extension of time to divest of a merchant banking investment. 					-Granted, May 28, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: June 5, 2009
From: lwilde1@mac.com [mailto:lwilde1@mac.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Wilder 

4905 Rollingwood Court 

Garland, TX 75043
From: ellie_murphy@hotmail.com [mailto:ellie_murphy@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elena Murphy 

4 8th Avenue 

Wareham, MA 02571
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Statistical and Data Coordinating 
Center for Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases.
    Date: August 22, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To Review and Evaluate Contract Proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lynn Rust, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-3938, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#264a5414141e5066484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1ddc3838389c7f1dfd8d99fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: July 24, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3730 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 23



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




                            -----------------------



          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
     statement of BSB Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 339-2138) of our
     report dated January 29, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
     statements of BSB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
     the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, 1996, which report is included in
     the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference on
     Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
     PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
     Syracuse, N.Y.
     March 29, 1999
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ADOLFO VALDEZ, a/k/a Adolfo Valdez-Pinales, a/k/a Angel Manuel Rios-Castro, a/k/a Big Al, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-92-9-F, CA-97-82-7-F) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adolfo Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Adolfo Valdez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Valdez , Nos. CR-92-9-F; CA97-82-7-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 1997). We note that Valdez could have challenged the two-level enhancement for possession of a firearm on direct appeal but did not. Therefore, he may not assert it in a collateral proceeding. See Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
October 16, 2015

Mr. Michael Hunley

521 Mulberry

Wyandotte, MI 48192

Dear Mr. Hunley:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on July 24, 2015, and filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−3154, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
ICRAS 1416 1845

- 0041 v 8 Affected Public

- Individuals 8 / 29 /2013

This request is for an extension of the information collection supporting the policies and reporting requirements contained in Subpart E of Part 668

– Verification and Updating of Student Aid Application Information. Sections 668.53, 668.54, 668.55, 668.56, 668.57, 668.59 and 668.61 contain information collection requirements (OMB control numbe r 1845

- 0041). This subpart governs the verification and updating of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) used to calculate an applicant’s Expected Family Contribution (EFC) for purposes of determining an applicant’s need for student financ ial assistance under Title IV of Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). The collection of this documentation helps ensure that students (and parents in the case of PLUS loans) receive the correct amount of Title I V program assistance b y providing accurate information to calculate an applicant’s expected family contribution. There has been no change to the regulatory language since the prior information collection filing. Section 668.55

– Updating information. The regulations require that all a pplicants update all dependency status changes throughout the award ye ar, update changes in household size, the number in the household attending postsecondary

educational institutions throughout the award y ear, and under certain situations a financial aid administrator can include changes in an applicant’s marital status. We estimate that approximately ten percent of the approximate 21 million FAFSA applicants will be required to update information listed above. # of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Re sponse # of Burden Hours ** 2,100,000 X 0.08 168,000
Note

- The double asterisk denotes this group as a subsection of the individuals identified in section 668.57 and is used to avoid double counting the same respondent. Section 668. 57

– Acceptable documentation. The regulations clarify

acceptable documentation for the specified areas for verification. The regulations also allow the institutions to accept income information provided on the FAFSA if it has been obtained directly from the Internal Revenue Service during the initial application process through the IR S Data Retrieval process when the retrieved data has not been changed by the applicant. The Department selected about 30 percent of the approximate 21 million FAFSA filers i n the 2012

- 2013 award ye ar. We anticipate it will take the applicant an average of seven minutes to review the verification request and locate the requested documents to provide to the institution. # of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Response # of B urden Hours 6,300,000 6,300,000 X 0.12 756,000
TOTAL S Responses 8,400,000 Respondents 6,300,000 Burden Hours 924,000
December 21, 2010

EXPLANATION OF FILE CONTENT In support of the February 15 - 18, 2011, SAP meeting to consider the report “ Source - to Outcome Modeling Physiologically -Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) Model linked to a Dietary Exposure Model : Chlorpyrifos as a Case Study ”, several electronic documents and modeling - related files are being made available to the SAP panel members as well as the general public . The contents of the files are generall y described as attachments “ A ” to “ H ” in the report, and these files appear on this CD within a series of folders marked as “Attachment A” to “Attachment H”. A listing of folder contents for each attachment appears below, along with any explanatory

notes on extra material available to SAP members.

 Attachment A: I

n vitro human metabolism summary (1 page) Note: Full copy of draft manuscript for submission also being made available to panel members in paper cop y format.  Attachment B: Philpott, P. (2009) "June 24 - 25, 2009 EPA Human Studies Review Board Meeting Report." Memo and final report (40 pages).  Attachment C: The L ifeStage and Variation models: acslX programs and associated m files .  Attachment D: Cleveland, C.B. (2010) "2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorp yr ifos." Dow AgroSciences Unpublished Report 101760 (140 pages).  Attachment E: Copies of inputs files used in dietary models (CARES, DEEM, LIFELINE) .  Attachment F: Copies of input files for PBPK/PD model runs.  Attachment G: Marty, M.S. and Andrus, A.K. (2010) "Compariso n of Cholinesterase (ChE) Inhibition in Young Adult and Preweanling CD Rats after Acute and Repeated Chlorpy rifos or Chlorp yr ifos - oxon Exposures." Dow AgroSciences Unpublished Report 091107 . Public release summary (7 pages).  Attachment H: Reiss, R.; Neal , B.; Lamb, J. (2010) "Benchmark Dose Modeling for Cholinesterase Inhibition from Exposure to Chlorpy rifos and Chlorpy

rifos - Oxon." Dow AgroSciences Unpublished Report 0900956.000 B0T0 06010 . Public release summary (4 pages).