alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1

                                                                    Exhibit 23
                                                                    ----------




                            Independent Auditors' Consent
                            -----------------------------


The Board of Directors
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-39140, No. 33-65722, No. 33-82864, No. 33-92106, No. 33-95930, No. 33-97590,
and No. 333-4499 on Form S-8 of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. (Roosevelt) of
our report dated January 20, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report
on Form 10-K, as amended, of Roosevelt.

Our report states that the supplemental fair value consolidated balance sheets
of Roosevelt have been prepared by management to present relevant financial
information that is not provided by the historical cost consolidated balance
sheets and is not intended to be a presentation in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. The supplemental fair value consolidated
balance sheets do not purport to present the net realizable, liquidation,
or market value of Roosevelt as a whole. Furthermore, amounts ultimately
realized by Roosevelt from the disposal of assets may vary significantly
from the fair values presented.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
April 29, 1997
EXHIBIT 10.1

   

 Exhibit 10.1
 

 BARRY L. WHELAN, P. GEO., F.G.A.C.
 Suite 2300, 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3X2
 Phone: (604) 558-4500:Fax: 604-680-8041
 e-mail: blwhelan@telus.net
  
 THIS AGREEMENT made the 2nd day of October, 2013, between
 

 Mr. Barry Whelan, P. Geo., (“Whelan”) is an individual with an office at
 Oceanic Plaza
 Suite 2300
 1066 West Hastings St.
 Vancouver, BC. V6E 3X2
 And
 Bison Petroleum Corp. (“Bison”)
 2825 East Cottonwood Park
 Suite 503
 Salt Lake City
 UT 84121
 

 WHEREAS:
 

 Barry L. Whelan (“Whelan”) is a Professional Geoscientist registered in the Province of British Columbia providing services to the natural resource industry, and Bison (the “Company”) is in the business of developing natural resources and is desirous of retaining the services of Whelan in his capacity as a geologist:
 

 NOW THEREFORE:
 

 Whelan offers to provide services to Company including but not limited to geological consulting, management of field operations, representation on technical and management committees, and preparation of qualifying reports.
 

 Company will remunerate Whelan at the rate of $2500 per month for the time spent in their service.  Whelan will provide services for up to 5 days per month.  Statements will be prepared and submitted on a monthly basis if requested.  Out of pocket expenses will be reimbursed upon submission of a monthly expense statement.
 
1

  
 
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunder executed this agreement the day and year first written above.
 

 

 /s/ Barry L. Whelan
 _____________________
 Barry L. Whelan, P.Geo
 

 

 /s/ Antonio Martinez-Guzman
 _____________________
 Bison Petroleum Corp.
 Antonio Martinez – Guzman, CEO, President.
 

 

 

 
2
#### In the Matter of Matthias B. Smith.

Order affirmed on opinion *oí*Lawrence, J., with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John R. Hart, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”);


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.








Date: March 29, 2012





/s/ John R. Hart


John R. Hart


President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2035 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2035

  To expand the boundary of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1995

  Mr. Orton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To expand the boundary of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Manti-La Sal National Forest 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The boundary of the Manti-La Sal National Forest is hereby modified 
and expanded as generally depicted on the map entitled ``Manti-La Sal 
National Forest Boundary Expansion 1994'' and dated September 22, 1994. 
The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the 
office of the Chief of the Forest Service in Washington, District of 
Columbia. For purposes of section 7(a)(1) of the Land and Water 
Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-9(a)(1)), the boundary of 
the Manti-La Sal National Forest, as modified by this Act, shall be 
treated as if it were the boundary of that forest on January 1, 1965.

SEC. 3. MANAGEMENT.

    (a) Transfer to Secretary of Agriculture and Administration as Part 
of Forest.--Subject to valid existing rights, administrative 
jurisdiction over the approximately 320 acres of lands that are under 
the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management and are depicted on 
the map referred to in section 2 is hereby transferred to the Secretary 
of Agriculture. Such lands are added to and, subject to subsection (b), 
shall be administered as part of the Manti-La Sal National Forest.
    (b) Existing Rights and Land Use Authorizations.--No provision of 
this section may be construed to affect valid existing rights, 
including interests in existing land use authorizations, with respect 
to the Federal lands generally depicted on the map referred to in 
section 2, except that such rights and authorizations shall be 
administered by the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief 
of the Forest Service, in accordance with this Act and other applicable 
laws. Renewal or reissuance of any such authorization shall be governed 
by the laws applicable to the National Forest System and regulations 
issued by the Secretary of Agriculture, except that the change in 
administrative jurisdiction under this Act shall not constitute in 
itself a ground to deny renewal or reissuance of any such 
authorization.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.29 Point of Order]
[Page 1100]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.29  point of order

  Mr. FRANK made a point of order, and said:
  ``Point of order, Mr. Speaker. This (the remarks of Mr. Paxon) clearly 
violates the spirit of the Speaker's previous instructions. I would like 
to be clear that unless we are going to have one test of rules for this 
party and another set of rules for the other, that clearly violates what 
the gentleman [the Speaker pro tempore] stated to the gentleman from 
Michigan [Mr. Bonior].''
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WALKER, sustained the point of order, and 
said:
  ``The Chair had reminded Members on both sides of the aisle when the 
question has been raised that they are to proceed in order. The Chair 
would continue to say to both sides of the aisle in fairness that they 
must proceed in order on the resolution. The subject matter under 
discussion is the election of the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Laughlin] on 
the Committee on Ways and Means. That should be the subject of the 
discussion on the floor.''
  After further debate,
  Mr. BOEHNER moved the previous question on the resolution to its 
adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WALKER, announced that the nays had it.
  Mr. BOEHNER objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

233

When there appeared

Nays

179
```
§ 180.511 Acceptable results of inspections and tests. Provided it conforms to other applicable requirements of this subchapter, a tank car is qualified for use if it successfully passes the inspections and tests set forth below conducted in accordance with this subpart. A representation of that qualification must consist of marking the tank in accordance with § 180.515. ( a ) *Visual inspection.* A tank car successfully passes the visual inspection when the inspection shows no structural defect that may cause leakage from or failure of the tank before the next inspection and test interval.
( b ) *Structural integrity inspection and test.* A tank car successfully passes the structural integrity inspection and test when it shows no structural defect that may initiate cracks or propagate cracks and cause failure of the tank before the next inspection and test interval.
( c ) *Service life shell thickness.* A tank car successfully passes the service life shell thickness inspection when the tank shell and heads show no thickness reduction below that allowed in § 180.509(g).
( d ) *Safety system inspection.* A tank car successfully passes the safety system inspection when each thermal protection system, tank head puncture resistance system, coupler vertical restraint system, and system used to protect discontinuities (e.g., breakage grooves on bottom outlets and protective housings) on the tank car conform to this subchapter and show no indication of a defect that may reduce reliability before the next inspection and test interval.
( e ) *Lining and coating inspection.* A tank car successfully passes the lining and coating inspection and test when the lining or coating conforms to the owner's acceptance criteria.
( f ) *Leakage pressure test.* A tank car successfully passes the leakage pressure test when all product piping, fittings and closures show no indication of leakage.
( g ) *Hydrostatic test.* A Class 107 tank car, the inner tank of a Class 115 tank car, or a riveted tank car successfully passes the hydrostatic test when it shows no leakage, distortion, excessive permanent expansion, or other evidence of weakness that might render the tank car unsafe for transportation service.
( h ) *Service equipment.* A tank car successfully passes the service equipment inspection and test when this equipment conforms to this subchapter and applicable provisions of Appendix D of the AAR Specifications for Tank Cars (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), and shows no indication of a defect that may reduce reliability during the qualification interval.
[Amdt. 180-8, 60 FR 49079, Sept. 21, 1995, as amended by Amdt. 179-50, 61 FR 33256, June 26, 1996; 66 FR 45187, Aug. 28, 2001; 77 FR 37990, June 25, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.373 Service lines: Cast iron and ductile iron. ( a ) Cast or ductile iron pipe less than 6 inches (152 millimeters) in diameter may not be installed for service lines.
( b ) If cast iron pipe or ductile iron pipe is installed for use as a service line, the part of the service line which extends through the building wall must be of steel pipe.
( c ) A cast iron or ductile iron service line may not be installed in unstable soil or under a building.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37503, July 13, 1998]
#### DELILAH COLE *v.*EBENEZER TERPENNING, Executor.

*Costs*— *when allowed upon an appeal from the decree of a surrogate —Code of Civil Procedure,*§§ 3550, 2585, 2589, 3240. •

Where upon an appeal from a decree of a surrogate, denying a petition to com pel the payment of legacies, on the ground that the claim is harred by the, statute of limitations, the General Term affirms the judgment, it may award costs at the same rates-.as are allowed upon an appeal from a judgment.

. Motion to amend the judgment of order of affirmance, entered in this action at a former term. The decision then made is reported in 25 Hun, at page 482.

*J. M.*Fiero, for the plaintiff.

*F. L.*Westbrook, for the defendant.

By the Court :

At the January General Term this court affirmed a decree of the surrogate of Ulster county, with costs. The decree was rendered upon a petition for the payment of legacies. The statute of limitations was pleaded in bar of the petitioner’s application. Such plea was sustained and a decree entered, denying the petitioner’s claim on that ground. On appeal from such decree the same was affirmed with costs. A motion is now made to correct the judgment or order of affirmance, by striking out the words “ costs,” and *112inserting in lien thereof “ ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.”

"We think there was no error in affirming the decree w.th costs. It was the final determination of the rights of the party to a special proceeding in the surrogate’s court. (Code of Civil Procedure, § 2550.) The appeal was in effect from a judgment, and the effect and mode of proceeding is the same. (Id., § 2585.) By section 2589 the appellate court may award to the successful party the costs of the appeal. Costs in such proceedings may be awarded at the rates allowed for similar services in an action brought in the same court in like manner. (§ 3210.)

The analogy between this appeal and one from a judgment is so complete as under the provisions, as well as a matter of right, to demand full costs of appeal in the appellate court. The decision as made was correct, and the motion to amend the order of affirmance must be denied, with ten dollars costs of motion.

Learned, P. J., and Landon, J., concurred.

Motion to correct order denied with ten dollars costs.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.55 Steel pipe. ( a ) New steel pipe is qualified for use under this part if: ( 1 ) It was manufactured in accordance with a listed specification;
( 2 ) It meets the requirements of— ( i ) Section II of appendix B to this part; or
( ii ) If it was manufactured before November 12, 1970, either section II or III of appendix B to this part; or
( 3 ) It is used in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section.
( b ) Used steel pipe is qualified for use under this part if: ( 1 ) It was manufactured in accordance with a listed specification and it meets the requirements of paragraph II-C of appendix B to this part;
( 2 ) It meets the requirements of: ( i ) Section II of appendix B to this part; or
( ii ) If it was manufactured before November 12, 1970, either section II or III of appendix B to this part;
( 3 ) It has been used in an existing line of the same or higher pressure and meets the requirements of paragraph II-C of appendix B to this part; or
( 4 ) It is used in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) New or used steel pipe may be used at a pressure resulting in a hoop stress of less than 6,000 p.s.i. (41 MPa) where no close coiling or close bending is to be done, if visual examination indicates that the pipe is in good condition and that it is free of split seams and other defects that would cause leakage. If it is to be welded, steel pipe that has not been manufactured to a listed specification must also pass the weldability tests prescribed in paragraph II-B of appendix B to this part.
( d ) Steel pipe that has not been previously used may be used as replacement pipe in a segment of pipeline if it has been manufactured prior to November 12, 1970, in accordance with the same specification as the pipe used in constructing that segment of pipeline.
( e ) New steel pipe that has been cold expanded must comply with the mandatory provisions of API Spec 5L (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7).
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 191-1, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970; Amdt. 192-12, 38 FR 4761, Feb. 22, 1973; Amdt. 192-51, 51 FR 15335, Apr. 23, 1986; 58 FR 14521, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37502, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-119, 80 FR 180, Jan. 5, 2015; 80 FR 46847, Aug. 6, 2015]
-----Original Message----- 

From: BigDaddy69_77@yahoo.com [mailto:BigDaddy69_77@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Big Daddy 

1813 Venice Drive 

Concord, CA 94519
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

# ACTION:

Notice to Cancel EAC Standards Board Virtual Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Election Assistance Commission has cancelled the EAC Standards Board Virtual Public Meeting scheduled for Monday, June 18, 2007, 7 a.m. EDT through Wednesday, June 20, 5 p.m. EDT. The meeting was announced in a sunshine notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, May 31, 2007. PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:                    

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Gracia M. Hillman,

Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-2772 Filed 5-30-07; 3:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 91220          Scale: 200,000          Edition: 3          Edition Date: 08-AUG-98          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1998/47**Notice ListingOCVLeftIndex-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00738-CV

Jason NIKKELS,

Appellant

v.

YC PARTNERS, LTD. d/b/a Yantis Company and Mike Yantis, Jr.,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CI-09354

Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 14, 2009

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.1(a)(2), stating they have resolved the dispute at issue and requesting this court 

dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2). 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc. (the issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|Date: August 5, 2003 |  | /s/John C. Pegram, Jr.                          
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | John C. Pegram, Jr.,                            
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                     | 
|Date: August 5, 2003 |  | /s/David A. Bean                                
|                     |  | David A. Bean,                                  
|                     |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer