alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending November 19, 2011

|Filer                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|HCBF HOLDING COMPANY, INC. | * 3A1         | HCBF Holding Company, Inc., Palm City, Forida, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Grand Bankshares, Inc., and its subsidiary, Grand Bank and Trust of Florida, both of West Palm Beach, Florida. | Newspaper:12/02/2011Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                 | 12/02/2011   
|Federal Register:          | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CCB CMNTY BK, ANDALUSIA, ALABAMA  | 655839 | 07/25/2011 | 11/13/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FIRST NAVY BK, PENSACOLA, FLORIDA | 581237 | 07/18/2011 | 10/31/2011     | NI        | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In connection with the Annual Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2)  for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maxim C. W. Webb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 1, 2013





/s/ Maxim C. W. Webb


Maxim C.W. Webb


Chief Financial Officer
#### Cole & *a. v.*Putnam.

To a plea of a discharge in bankruptcy, a replication alleging that the plaintiff was induced to take the draft in suit by the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant that he was the agent of a company, and that the draft was accepted by the company, is good; but a replication alleging merely that the defendant at the time he accepted the draft did not intend to pay it, is bad.

Assumpsit, upon drafts accepted by the defendant, who pleaded in bar his discharge in bankruptcy. The plaintiffs filed two replications stated in the opinion, to which the defendant demurred.

*R. M. Wallace,*for the plaintiffs.

*A. F. Stevens,*for the defendant.

Carpenter, J.

The plaintiffs, in their first replication, allege “ that the debt which they seek to recover in this action was created by the fraud of the defendant, in that he induced the plaintiffs to take said drafts by his false representations; that he was the agent of a certain company or corporation, to wit, the Lyndeborough Glass Company, and that said drafts were accepted by said glass company, whereas in truth and in fact the defendant was not the agent of said company, and the drafts were not accepted by said company, as the defendant well knew.” This is a sufficient allegation that the debt was created by fraud, within the meaning of the bankrupt law. U. S. Rev. Sts., *s.*5117; *Neal*v. *Clark,*95 U. S. 704; *Stewart*v. *Emerson,*52 N. H. 301.

In their second replication, the plaintiffs say “ that the debt which *423they seek to recover in this action was created by the fraud of the defendant, in that the defendant at the time he accepted said drafts did not intend to pay the same.” This is not enough to show that the debt was created by fraud. It is not averred that the defendant induced the plaintiffs to receive the drafts by fraudulently representing or causing the plaintiffs to believe that he intended to pay them, or that he fraudulently concealed his intent not to pay them. *Stewart*v. *Emerson, supra.*

*Demurrer to the first replication overruled; to the second, sustained.*

Cl AUK, J., did not sit; the others concurred.
§ 401.210 Requirements and qualifications for registration. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76347 , Sept. 17, 2024.
( a ) No person shall be registered as a United States Registered Pilot unless: ( 1 ) The individual holds a license or MMC endorsed as a master, mate, or pilot, issued under the authority of the provisions of Title 52 of the Revised Statutes, and has acquired at least twenty-four months service as a licensed or credentialed officer or comparable experience on vessels or integrated tugs and tows, of 4,000 gross tons, or over, operating on the Great Lakes or oceans. Those applicants qualifying with ocean service must have obtained at least six months of service as a licensed or credentialed officer or comparable experience on the Great Lakes. Those applicants qualifying with comparable experience must have served a minimum of twelve months as a deck officer under the authority of their license or MMC.
( 2 ) The individual is a citizen of the United States.
( 3 ) The individual is of good moral character and temperate habits.
( 4 ) The individual is physically competent to perform the duties of a U.S. Registered Pilot and meets the medical requirements prescribed by the Commandant.
( 5 ) The individual has not reached the age of 70.
( 6 ) Until April 15, 2009, the individual possesses a validated Merchant Mariner's Document issued by the Coast Guard or a valid Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC). After April 15, 2009, the individual must posses a valid TWIC.
( 7 ) The individual agrees to be available for service under the terms and conditions as may be approved or prescribed by the Commandant.
( 8 ) The individual has complied with the requirements set forth in § 401.220(b) for Applicant Pilots if applying for registration for waters in which a pilotage pool is authorized.
( 9 ) The individual agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of this part and amendments thereto.
( b ) Any person registered as a United States Registered Pilot pursuant to the provisions of this part whose application contains false or misleading statements furnished by the applicant in furtherance of his or her application shall be in violation of these regulations and may be proceeded against under § 401.250(a) or § 401.500.
[29 FR 10464, July 28, 1964] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 401.210, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
DAVID C. McDONALD (1897 -1971) DAVID McDONALD McDONALD & McDONALD Attorneys at Law

Established 1927 P. 0. Box 669122-9428 Miami, Florida 33135-2321

TELEPHONE (305) 643-5313 FACSIMILE (305) 643-4990 dmm@mcdonaldattomeys.com

October 1, 2014 DAVID M. McDONALD*
*Board Certified inAviation Law

ViaFax: 404-305-5223 and U.S. Mail, First Class Mail Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Re: PazAviation, Inc. FinalNotice ofProposed Civil Penalty Case No. 2011S0190272 OurFile No. 12-138 REQUEST FORHEARING To Whom ItMay Concern: 

# RECEIVED OCT 

## 0 9 2014 

## HEARING DOCKET

Paz Aviation, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby requests a hearing on the Administrator's Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty in accordance with 14 C.P.R. §13.16.
Sincerely, McDONALD & McDONALD

DMM:mml cc: Willi=P. Vines, Esq. cc: PazAviation, Inc.- via email
-----Original Message----- 

From: jeanbjorn@comcast.net [mailto:jeanbjorn@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. 

Those suffering from mental illness or substance abuse are in need of 

medical intervention, no more or less than a person who has pneumonia, 

or a broken limb, heart disease or cancer. There should be no 

difference in what they pay out-of-pocket than any other insured 

individual. 

Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care 

coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jean Bjorn 

932 Albert Ave 

Sycamore, IL 60178
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39803-39804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of Navy


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is deleting a system of records in 
its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 
1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
August 20, 2007 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA Policy 
Branch, Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36), 2000 Navy Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20350-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department the Navy systems of records 
notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register

[[Page 39804]]

and are available from the address above.
    The Department of Navy proposes to delete a system of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or 
altered systems reports.

    Dated: July 13, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
N12930-2

System name:
    Area Coordinator Information and Operation Files (February 22, 
1993, 58 FR 10825).

Reason:
    Program changed which required the establishment of a new system. 
The new system is N12713-1, Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) 
Complaints Tracking System which was published in the Federal Register 
on May 14, 2007, 72 FR 27094.
[FR Doc. 07-3534 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

9 a.m. (Eastern Time), June 19, 2007. 

# Place:

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# Status:

Open. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Approval of the minutes of the May 22, 2007 Board member meeting. 

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director. 

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report. 

b. Monthly Investment Performance Report. 

c. Legislative Report. 

3. Investment consultant report on the impact of legislative proposals that would impose investment restrictions on the I Fund. 

4. Analysis and recommendations on automatic enrollment, changing the default fund, and establishing a Roth feature. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: June 7, 2007. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-2913 Filed 6-7-07; 4:36 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
#### § 178.337-12 [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL C. LINT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 278 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.703 General. ( a ) No person may operate a segment of pipeline, unless it is maintained in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) Each segment of pipeline that becomes unsafe must be replaced, repaired, or removed from service.
( c ) Hazardous leaks must be repaired promptly.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
SCI Engineered Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald
      S. BlaskieVice
      President and Chief Financial Officer ofSCI
      Engineered Materials, Inc.February
      17, 2010
#### Ex Parte C. J. Beverly.

*No. 795.*

*Decided June 22.*

Habeas Corpus—Validity of a Complaint.—A party is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus to have the sufficiency of a complaint upon which he has been arrested determined. He has no right to he discharged by writ of habeas corpus because the complaint is defective.

Appeal from the District Court of Cooke. Tried below before Hon. D. E. Barrett.

*645The case is stated in the opinion.

*Adams & Gofer,*for relator.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for respondent.

HURT, Presiding Judge.

Relator was indicted for swindling, on the 29th day of May, 1895. The indictment was quashed, the court entering an order remanding the relator to the custody of the sheriff until the complaint could be filed against him. The complaint was filed within ten days; namely, on the same day appellant applied by writ of habeas corpus to the district judge to be discharged, contending that the complaint is insufficient. The complaint evidently attempts to charge swindling. Whether the same be sufficient or not can not be determined by writ of habeas corpus. When this complaint was filed, it was the duty of the officer within a reasonable time to take the relator before a justice of the peace for the purpose of having the cause examined as the law requires. Relator would have a right to demand that this be done, but no right to be discharged by writ of habeas corpus because the complaint is defective, if it be so. Complaint is also made of the warrant. The warrant is fatally defective, but, if relieved from custody because of the defective warrant, relator could be arrested upon the complaint by virtue of a sufficient warrant, and the relief would be in name only.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          46,427
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    263,602
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,062
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           288,424
<LOANS>                                      1,010,107
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,363,120
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,118,052
<SHORT-TERM>                                   120,502
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,837
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,363,120
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 88,580
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,672
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               106,252
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              47,324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,146
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           53,782
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,971
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,208
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,079
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      25,079
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.80
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,981
<LOANS-PAST>                                       236
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,065
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,815
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,832
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,054
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,054
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Disposition of the Real Estate of Anthony Wasser, Deceased, for the Payment of his Debts.

Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.