alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.41 Sampling and testing program for unrefined petroleum-based products. ( a ) *General.* Unrefined petroleum-based products offered for transportation must be properly classed and described as prescribed in § 173.22, in accordance with a sampling and testing program, which specifies at a minimum: ( 1 ) A frequency of sampling and testing that accounts for any appreciable variability of the material (*e.g.,* history, temperature, method of extraction [including chemical use], location of extraction, time of year, length of time between shipments);
( 2 ) Sampling prior to the initial offering of the material for transportation and when changes that may affect the properties of the material occur (*i.e.,* mixing of the material from multiple sources, or further processing and then subsequent transportation);
( 3 ) Sampling methods that ensure a representative sample of the entire mixture, as offered, is collected;
( 4 ) Testing methods that enable classification of the material under the HMR;
( 5 ) Quality control measures for sample frequencies;
( 6 ) Duplicate sampling methods or equivalent measures for quality assurance;
( 7 ) Criteria for modifying the sampling and testing program; and
( 8 ) Testing or other appropriate methods used to identify properties of the mixture relevant to packaging requirements (*e.g.,* compatibility with packaging, identifying specific gravity for filling packages).
( b ) *Certification.* Each person who offers a hazardous material for transportation shall certify, as prescribed by § 172.204 of this subchapter, that the material is offered for transportation in accordance with this subchapter, including the requirements prescribed by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Documentation, retention, review, and dissemination of program.* The sampling and testing program must be documented in writing (*i.e.* hardcopy or electronic file thereof) and must be retained for as long as the sampling and testing program remains in effect, or a minimum of one year. The sampling and testing program must be reviewed at least annually and revised and/or updated as necessary to reflect changed circumstances. The most recent version of the sampling and testing program must be available to the employees who are responsible for implementing it. When the sampling and testing program is updated or revised, all employees responsible for implementing it must be notified, and the most recent version must be made available.
( d ) *Access by DOT to program documentation.* Each person required to develop and implement a sampling and testing program must maintain a copy of the sampling and testing program documentation (or an electronic file thereof) that is accessible at, or through, its principal place of business, and must make the documentation available upon request at a reasonable time and location to an authorized official of the Department of Transportation.
[80 FR 26746, May 8, 2015]
No. 32,081

#### The State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. W. E. Fleming, *Appellant,*(P. F. Dobson et al., Defendants).

(37 P. 2d 12)

Opinion filed November 3, 1934.

*Alvin R. Springer,*of Manhattan, *Edgar Bennett,*of Washington, and *Guy L. Hursh,*of Topeka, for the appellant.

*Roland Boynton,*attorney-general, *E. E. Steerman,*assistant attorney-general, *L. W. Rosenkranz*and *Scott Pjuetze,*county attorneys, for the appellee; *Hart Workman*and *Forrest D. Smythe,*both of Topeka, of counsel.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

W. E. Fleming was charged with others with violating the speculative securities act and, on a separate trial, was convicted. He appeals.

Defendant was charged in one count of the information with sale of unregistered shares of corporate stock of the Corgona Gold Mining Company to J. E. Morgan, and in another count with selling the securities without being registered as agent. The evidence disclosed a transaction similar to the one considered in the case of *State v. Dobson,*ante, p. 445, just decided. Defendant was found guilty on each count, and was separately sentenced on each count. Defendant contends that whatever he did constituted but one transaction, for which he could be subjected to but one punishment. The contention is fallacious.

The transaction with Morgan had separate and distinct characteristics, each of which, independently of the other, was the gravamen of a separate and distinct offense denounced by the statute. The only common element of the two offenses was sale of securities. That was unlawful only because of something else. Illegitimacy *465of the securities corrupted the transaction in one way. Disqualification of the seller corrupted the. transaction in a different way. It was immaterial to the offense of selling unregistered securities that the agent was or was not registered. It was immaterial to the offense of selling by an unregistered agent that the securities were or were not registered. There was no identity of criminal ingredient and, that being true, defendant was properly prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced for each violation of the law involved in the single sale transaction.

The case of *State v. McLaughlin,*121 Kan. 693, 249 Pac. 612, is cited and relied on by defendant. In that case defendant was convicted of being intoxicated in a public place, a public street, and of operating an automobile on a public street while intoxicated. The case presented a situation the converse of the one now under consideration^ There was nothing wrongful in defendant’s being in a public place or in driving an automobile in that place. What made his conduct unlawful was the single fact he was intoxicated. That was the vital incriminating element in the two offenses, and it was held he could be punished but once.

Other questions presented are disposed of- by the decision in the case of *State v. Dobson,*referred to above.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
#### Daniel Vail, *Respondent, v.*The Long Island Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
<PAGE>   1
                          SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months Ended
                                                              -----------------------
                                                              Dec. 31,       Dec. 31,
                                                                1995           1994
                                                              --------       --------
<S>                                                           <C>             <C>
Earnings:
   Net income (loss)                                          $  (293)       $   494
                                                              =======        =======


Shares:
   Average common shares outstanding                           29,873         25,815
   Add effect of dilutive options and warrants
   (as determined by the treasury stock method)                    --              5
                                                              -------        -------

   As Adjusted                                                 29,873         25,820
                                                              =======        =======



   Earnings per share                                         $ (0.01)       $  0.02
                                                              =======        =======
</TABLE>
H

H

H

H

H

H H

H

H

H

H

î

î

î

î

î

î î îî î

" î

" "

" "

"

"

"

" " "

1500

ARIZONA

PIMA CO

Sonoyta

Valley

Sonoyta Valley

Dos

Lomitas

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Dos Lomitas Ranch

Picnic Area

West of

Lukeville

Diaz

Peak

South of

Lukeville

Blankenship

Well

Lukeville

3517

20

35

3519

18

35

25

35

22

35

3523

26

35

21

35

24

35

35

27

35

15

28

35

35 000mN

3521

3518

16

35

35

35

22

17

20

3519

35

24

35

23

35

15 N

35

3

27

35

000m

26

323 24 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333

3

000m

3

334

24

E

E 25 326 327 328

410

3

000 FEET

3 30 3 32 333 323000m 29 3 31 440000 FEET

FEET

310

30"

000

47'

FEET

30"

47'

47'

30"

50' 50'

112°52' 47'

112°

30" 30"

31°52'

52'30"

31°52'30"

31° 31°45'

30"

45'

280000

50' 112°45'

334

112°45' 50'

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ARIZONA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SOUTH OF LUKEVILLE, AZ-SON

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

SOUTH OF LUKEVILLE QUADRANGLE

ARIZONA-SONORA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2007

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2003

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Arizona Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

UA

12R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 57 ́

17 MILS

10° 57 ́

195 MILS
§ 176.178 Mooring lines. ( a ) All lines used in mooring the vessel must be of sufficient strength, type, and number for the size of the vessel and local conditions.
( b ) While the vessel is moored or anchored in a port area, towing wires of adequate size and length must be properly secured to mooring bits at the bow and stern ready for immediate use with the towing eyes passed outboard and kept at about water level.
( c ) The mooring arrangements must be such that the vessel can be released quickly in an emergency.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew I. Sealfon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed Amendment No. 2 to the Form 10-QSB of Repro-Med Systems, Inc.
(the "Report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
----------------------------
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  “Report”),  Richard T. Schumacher, President and Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Executive Officer, of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:





(1)          The 
Report  of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 31, 2010
              /s/ Richard T.
SchumacherRichard
      T. SchumacherPresident
      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pressure BioSciences, Inc., and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 178.255-11 Tank mountings. ( a ) Tanks shall be designed and fabricated with mountings to provide a secure base in transit. “Skids” or similar devices shall be deemed to comply with this requirement.
( b ) All tank mountings such as skids, fastenings, brackets, cradles, lifting lugs, etc., intended to carry loadings shall be permanently secured to tanks in accordance with the requirements under which the tanks are fabricated, and shall be designed with a factor of safety of four, and built to withstand loadings in any direction equal to two times the weight of the tanks and attachments when filled to the maximum permissible loaded weight.
( c ) Lifting lugs or side hold-down lugs shall be provided on the tank mountings in a manner suitable for attaching lifting gear and hold-down devices. Lifting lugs and hold-down lugs welded directly to the tank shall be of the pad-eye type. Doubling plates welded to the tank and located at the points of support shall be deemed to comply with this requirement.
( d ) All tank mountings shall be so designed as to prevent the concentration of excessive loads on the tank shell.
JOHN E. BRATCHER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1007

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Hentz McClellan, Judge.

John E. Bratcher, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
-----Original Message----- 

From: theauroradawn@yahoo.com [mailto:theauroradawn@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dawn Lillis 

2729 Maitland crossing way 

ORLANDO, FL 32810
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hudson United Bancorp (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth T. Neilson, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James W. Nall, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|                                                       
|/s/    Kenneth T. Neilson                              
|                                                       
|Kenneth T. Neilson Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2004



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|                                                  
|/s/    James W. Nall                              
|                                                  
|James W. Nall Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2004
EXHIBIT 3(i).2

                                                             888349163       9AM
                                                                           FILED
                                                                     DEC 14 1988

                             CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
                                       OF
                    GOLD EQUITY, INC. INTO EQUITY GOLD, INC.


     The undersigned  corporation  organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That  the  name  and  the  state  of  incorporation  of each of the
conituent corporation of the merger is as follows:

                Name                    State of Incorporation
                ------------------      ----------------------
                Equity Gold, Inc.               Delaware

                Gold Equity, Inc.               Delaware

     SECOND:  That a Plan and  Agreement  of Merger  between  the parties to the
merger has been approved, adopted, certified,  executed and acknowledged by each
of the constituent  corporations,  in accordance with the requirements contained
under Section 231(c) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     THIRD:  That the name of the  surviving  corporation  of the merger  Equity
Gold, Inc.

     FOURTH:  That the executed  Plan and  Agreement of Merger is on file at the
principal  place of business of the  surviving  corporation.  The address of the
principal place of business of the surviving  corporation is 14901 Quorum Drive,
Suite 300, Dallas Texas 75240.

     FIFTH: That a copy of the Plan and Agreement of Merger will be furnished by
the surviving  corporation,  on request and without cost, to any  shareholder of
either constituent corporation.


Dated: December 13, 1988

                                        Equity Gold, Inc.

                                        By: /s/ Jimmy R. Carter
                                        --------------------------
                                        Jimmy R. Carter
                                        President


ATTEST:

By: /s/ L.A. Newian, Jr.
---------------------------
L.A. Newian, Jr.
Secretary
"richardastrust.com" <richard@astrust.com>

10/28/2007 09:50 PM To Margaret Sheppard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Dave Godwin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Julius Banks/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, george <georgew2@comcast.net> cc bcc Subjec t hcr188c guidelines For Follow Up: Urgent Priority
Margaret: George completed the guidelines and we are forwarding to you for HCR188C. If you have any comments or questions please feel free to contact me. Richard Richard Maruya phone 808 2351890 fax 808 235 0116 cell 808 5614688 e mail richard@maruya.net or richard@astrust.com web site HCR188C www.hcr188c.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e - mail may contain confidential or privil eged information, if you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, then please notify us by return e - mail immediately. Should you have received this e -mail in error then you shou ld not copy this for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.