alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 1, 1995 (59), Para 59.20 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 609]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.59.20  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 44: Mr. Traficant, Mr. Jefferson, Mrs. Cubin, Mr. 
     Ehrlich, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Sabo, Mr. 
     Pickett, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Peterson of Florida, Mr. Quinn, 
     Mr. Wamp, and Mr. Laughlin.
       H.R. 46: Mr. Kleczka.
       H.R. 393: Mrs. Kennelly and Mr. Torricelli.
       H.R. 408: Mr. Burton of Indiana.
       H.R. 580: Mr. Clinger, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Smith of 
     Texas, Mr. Manton, Ms. Furse, Mr. Shaw, Mrs. Fowler, and Mr. 
     Sisisky.
       H.R. 656 : Ms. Molinari and Ms. Lowey.
       H.R. 858: Mr. McDermott, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Martinez, Ms. 
     Lofgren, Mr. Studds, Mr. Berman, Mr. Clement, Mr. Manton, Mr. 
     Leach, and Mr. Foglietta.
       H.R. 863: Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 922: Mr. Engel and Mr. Romero-Barcelo.
       H.R. 961: Mr. McDade, Mr. Gekas, and Mr. Linder.
       H.R. 967: Mr. Bishop, Mr. Manton, Mr. Gordon, and Ms. 
     Furse.
       H.R. 972: Mr. Stump.
       H.R. 991: Ms. Lowey and Mr. Engel.
       H.R. 1005: Mr. Porter.
       H.R. 1021: Mr. DeFazio, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Borski, and Mr. 
     Shays.
       H.R. 1023: Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. 
     Pelosi, Mr. Fox, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Solomon, 
     Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Barcia of Michigan, Mr. King, 
     Mr. Borski, Mr. Moakley, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Coyne, Mr. Holden, 
     Ms. Norton, and Mr. Foglietta.
       H.R. 1024: Mr. Ganske, Mr. Cooley, and Mr. Smith of Texas.
       H.R. 1026: Mr. Allard, Mr. McInnis, Mr. Schaefer, Mrs. 
     Schroeder, and Mr. Skaggs.
       H.R. 1033: Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Zimmer, Ms. Lowey, and Mr. 
     Baker of California.
       H.R. 1120: Mr. Portman and Mr. Hostettler.
       H.R. 1232: Mr. Lewis of California and Mr. Dooley.
       H.R. 1235: Mr. Meehan, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, and Mr. 
     Barrett of Wisconsin.
       H.R. 1248:  Mr. Yates.
       H.R. 1272:  Mr. Gene Green of Texas.
       H.R. 1274: Mr. Porter, Mr. Reed, Mr. Brown of Ohio, and Mr. 
     Visclosky.
       H.R. 1448: Mr. Bunning of Kentucky.
       H.R. 1469: Mr. Rangel.
       H.R. 1496: Mr. Solomon, Mr. Dellums, and Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 1506: Mr. Bono.
       H.J. Res. 41: Mr. Luther.
       H.J. Res. 72: Mr. Livingston.
       H. Res. 21: Mr. Mascara, Mr. Lazio of New York, and Ms. 
     Lofgren.
       H. Res. 118: Mr. Klug, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Dooley, Mr. 
     Gejdenson, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. Hilliard, Ms. Rivers, Mr. 
     Thompson, Mr. Ward, Mr. Evans, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Miller of 
     California, Mr. Abercrombie, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Kolbe, Mrs. 
     Kelly, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Ackerman, and Ms. 
     Furse.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 173.30 Loading and unloading of transport vehicles.

A person who is subject to the loading and unloading regulations in this subchapter must load or unload hazardous materials into or from a transport vehicle or vessel in conformance with the applicable loading and unloading requirements of parts 174, 175, 176, and 177 of this subchapter.

[68 FR 61941, Oct. 30, 2003]
#### Robert Maloney, Appellant, *v.*Lestershire Lumber and Box Company, Respondent.

*Maloney*v. *Lestershire Lumber & Box Co.,*138 App. Div. 593, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 26, 1910, affirming a judgment of the Broome County Court in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for goods sold and delivered.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction of the appeal, the action having been commenced in the City Court of Binghamton and permission to appeal not having been obtained.

*Charles H. Hitchcock*for motion.

*Frank L. Wooster*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, on authority of *Sidwell*v. *Greig*(157 N. Y. 30).
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549**

**FORM 10-K/A**

**[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003**

**OR**

**[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT****OF 1934**

**For the transition period from        to**

**Commission File No. 1-7807**

**  CHAMPION PARTS, INC.       **

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.25-30 Electrical engineering equipment.

For inspection procedures of electrical engineering equipment and systems see subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.199 Requirements for design of pressure relief and limiting devices. Except for rupture discs, each pressure relief or pressure limiting device must: ( a ) Be constructed of materials such that the operation of the device will not be impaired by corrosion;
( b ) Have valves and valve seats that are designed not to stick in a position that will make the device inoperative;
( c ) Be designed and installed so that it can be readily operated to determine if the valve is free, can be tested to determine the pressure at which it will operate, and can be tested for leakage when in the closed position;
( d ) Have support made of noncombustible material;
( e ) Have discharge stacks, vents, or outlet ports designed to prevent accumulation of water, ice, or snow, located where gas can be discharged into the atmosphere without undue hazard;
( f ) Be designed and installed so that the size of the openings, pipe, and fittings located between the system to be protected and the pressure relieving device, and the size of the vent line, are adequate to prevent hammering of the valve and to prevent impairment of relief capacity;
( g ) Where installed at a district regulator station to protect a pipeline system from overpressuring, be designed and installed to prevent any single incident such as an explosion in a vault or damage by a vehicle from affecting the operation of both the overpressure protective device and the district regulator; and
( h ) Except for a valve that will isolate the system under protection from its source of pressure, be designed to prevent unauthorized operation of any stop valve that will make the pressure relief valve or pressure limiting device inoperative.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-1, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970]
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part includes: ( 1 ) Definitions of hazardous materials for transportation purposes;
( 2 ) Requirements to be observed in preparing hazardous materials for shipment by air, highway, rail, or water, or any combination thereof; and
( 3 ) Inspection, testing, and retesting responsibilities for persons who retest, recondition, maintain, repair and rebuild containers used or intended for use in the transportation of hazardous materials.
( b ) A shipment of hazardous materials that is not prepared in accordance with this subchapter may not be offered for transportation by air, highway, rail, or water. It is the responsibility of each hazmat employer subject to the requirements of this subchapter to ensure that each hazmat employee is trained in accordance with the requirements prescribed in this subchapter. It is the duty of each person who offers hazardous materials for transportation to instruct each of his officers, agents, and employees having any responsibility for preparing hazardous materials for shipment as to applicable regulations in this subchapter.
( c ) In general, the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) contained in this subchapter are based on the UN Recommendations and are consistent with international regulations issued by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO Technical Instructions) and the International Maritime Organization (IMDG Code). However, the HMR are not consistent in all respects with the UN Recommendations, the ICAO Technical Instructions or the IMDG Code, and compliance with the HMR will not guarantee acceptance by regulatory bodies outside of the United States.
[Amdt. 173-94, 41 FR 16062, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 173-100, 41 FR 40476, Sept. 20, 1976; Amdt. 173-161, 48 FR 2655, Jan. 20, 1983; Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52606, Dec. 21, 1990; Amdt. 173-231, 57 FR 20953, May 15, 1992; 64 FR 10776, Mar. 5, 1999; 68 FR 61941, Oct. 30, 2003]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 5, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00884

- CR

Josue Aaron DELGADO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

A ppellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR2683 The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding



### O RDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 15, 2019; however, the court granted an extension of time to file the brief until May 31, 2019. On June 3, 2019, appellant filed a motion

req uesting an additional thirty days to file the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellant’s attorney, Cathy S. Comptom, to file the brief by July 1, 2019 (77 days after the original due date). Counsel is advised that no further

extensions of time wil l be granted absent a motion, filed by the date the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reaso nable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 1.100 The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.

Is responsible for the development, operation, and maintenance of that part of the Saint Lawrence Seaway within the territorial limits of the United States.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Blue Ribbon Panel on VA-Medical School Affiliations has scheduled a meeting for September 21, 2007, in Room 542 at 1800 G Street, NW., Washington, DC from 8:30 a.m. until 2 p.m.  The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Panel is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, through the Under Secretary for Health, on issues related to a comprehensive philosophical framework to enhance VA's partnerships with medical schools and affiliated institutions.

The panelists will review VA's current affiliations with medical schools and will receive background presentations and issue papers on various topics that are relevant to the Panel's deliberations.

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the Panel.  Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, depending on the number of participants.  Interested parties may also provide written comments for review by the Panel prior to the meeting or at any time, by e-mail to                     *Gloria.Holland@va.gov*                     or by mail to Gloria J. Holland, Ph.D. Special Assistant for Policy and Planning to the Chief Academic Affiliations Officer, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., (14), Washington, DC 20420.                

Dated: July 25, 2007.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3714 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of BioVest International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers
knowledge and belief, that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                        
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 20, 2005 |  | /s/ James A. McNulty                                   
|                   |  | James A. McNulty, Secretary and Chief Financial
Officer



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1146]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. PARKER:

       At the end of the bill, insert after the last section 
     (preceding the short title) the following new section:
       Sec.  . (a) Limitation on Use of Funds.--None of the funds 
     made available in this Act may be used by the Department of 
     Energy in implementing the Codes and Standards Program to 
     plan, propose, issue, or prescribe any new or amended 
     standard.
       (b) Corresponding Reduction in Funds.--The aggregate amount 
     otherwise provided in this Act for ``DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY--
     Energy Conservation'' is hereby reduced by $12,799,000.

Yeas

261

It was decided in the

Nays

165

affirmative

Answered present

1
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-36]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans will be held on January 22-23, 
2007, at the Phoenix Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center 
Building 21, Room 108, 650 East Indian School Road, Phoenix, Arizona. 
The meeting will begin at 8 a.m. and end at 4 p.m. each day. The 
meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs with an ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of the 
policies, organizationl structures, and services of the Department in 
assisting homeless veterans. The Committee shall assemble and review 
information relating to the needs of homeless veterans and provide 
advice on the most appropriate means of offering assistance to homeless 
veterans. The Committee will make recommendations to the Secretary 
regarding such activities.
    On January 22, the session will break into working groups at 10 
a.m. and reconvene at 3 p.m. to hear reports from VA and other 
officials. On January 23, the Committee will continue to receive 
reports and begin preparation of its upcoming annual report and 
recommendations to the Secretary.
    Those wishing to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Pete 
Dougherty, Department of Veterans Affairs, at (202) 273-5764. No time 
will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the public. 
However, the Committee will accept written comments from interested 
parties on issues affecting homeless veterans. Such comments should be 
referred to the Committee at the following address: Advisory Committee 
on Homeless Veterans, Homeless Veterans Programs Office (075D), U.S. 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20420.

    Dated: January 3, 2007.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-36 Filed 1-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
From: rosalindwillis@charter.net [mailto:rosalindwillis@charter.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rosalind Willis 

211 Stoney Knob Rd 

Weaverville, NC 28787
99-93.

#### State v. Hanna.

Warren C.P. No. 98CR17677. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that appellant’s motion for stay of execution be, and hereby is, granted, pending disposition of this appeal.
Exhibit 10.7


                                 AMENDMENT TO
                      1989 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
                             EFFECTIVE AUGUST 2, 1995

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following sentence shall be added to the 1989 
Plan at the end of Section 13.5:

               Grantees subject to the "insider trading" provisions of 
Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act may also elect to exercise a SAR for cash 
settlement if such cash settlement is made pursuant to an irrevocable 
election made by the Grantee at least six months in advance of the effective 
date of such cash settlement.

; and

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 13.8 and Section 13.9, as follow, shall 
be added to the 1989 Plan:

          13.8.  In no event may any employee who is granted an Award under 
the Plan hold such derivative security for less than six months prior to 
disposition of the derivative security or its underlying equity securities.

          13.9.  A Grantee who is subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange 
Act may avail himself of the alternative methods of payment set forth in 
Section 13.3 and Section 13.4 of this Plan only if such Grantee (i) makes an 
irrevocable election to use such payment method at least six months prior to 
the effective date of the transaction or (ii) if such transaction is effected 
during a period beginning on the third business day following the date of 
release for publication of the Company's quarterly or annual summary 
statements of sales and earnings and ending on the twelfth business day 
following such date.
§ 95.10-15 Piping. ( a ) All piping, valves, and fittings shall meet the applicable requirements of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) All distribution cut-off valves shall be marked as required by § 97.37-10 of this subchapter.
( c ) For vessels on an international voyage, the diameter of the fire main shall be sufficient for the effective distribution of the maximum required discharge from two fire pumps operating simultaneously. This requirement is in addition to § 95.10-5(c). The discharge of this quantity of water through hoses and nozzles at a sufficient number of adjacent hydrants shall be at a minimum Pitot tube pressure of approximately 50 pounds per square inch.
#### § 172.804 Relationship to other Federal requirements.

To avoid unnecessary duplication of security requirements, security plans that conform to regulations, standards, protocols, or guidelines issued by other Federal agencies, international organizations, or industry organizations may be used to satisfy the requirements in this subpart, provided such security plans address the requirements specified in this subpart.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40428

 

TOM FLEMING,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOWN OF RANCHO VIEJO, TEXAS, ET AL.,

Defendants,

TOWN OF RANCHO VIEJO, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellant,

versus

GASPAR ALVAREZ HERNANDEZ,

Intervenor DefendantAppellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(B-90-CV-152)

 

December 9, 1996

Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.*
2

PER CURIAM:

As defendant-appellant correctly points out, the magistrate

judge, who purported to enter a final judgment in this case, lacked

jurisdiction to do so because several of the parties, including the

defendant Town of Rancho Viejo and the five individual defendants

other than Halleman, did not consent to entry of judgment by the

magistrate judge as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and Fed. R.

Civ. P. 73(b). This was pointed out below by objections to the

magistrate judge’s purported judgment. We note that although

individual defendant Halleman did consent, and was the mayor of the

Town of Rancho Viejo, he did not purport to consent on its behalf,

or sign the consent as “Mayor,” or otherwise than simply in his own

name. See EEOC v. West La. Health Services, Inc., 959 F.2d 1277,

1281-82 (5th Cir. 1992); Caprera v. Jacobs, 790 F.2d 442, 445-46

(5th Cir. 1986); Parks v. Collins, 761 F.2d 1101, 1106 (5th Cir.

1985). Accordingly, the purported final judgment entered by the

magistrate judge is vacated and the cause is remanded.

VACATED and REMANDED