alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: rovenshire@yahoo.com [mailto:rovenshire@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:00 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ruthann Ovenshire 

201 Bedford St. SE 

Minneapolis, MN 55414
**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**

----

**FORM 10-Q**

----

**[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

OR
**[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

Commission File Number 0-11176

**NTS-PROPERTIES III**

Incorporated pursuant to the Laws of the State of Georgia

Internal Revenue Service - Employer Identification No. 61-1017240

10172 Linn Station Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40223

(502) 426-4800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant  (1) has filed all reports  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange  Act of 1934  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such  shorter  period  that the  registrant  was  required to file suchreports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.               Yes |X|      No  |   |

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

**PART I**
Pages Item 1.Financial Statements Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 20013 Statement of Partners' Equity as of September 30, 20023 Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months    Ended September 30, 2002 and 20014  Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months    Ended September 30, 2002 and 20015  Notes to Financial Statements6-10  Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial    Condition and Results of Operations11-16  Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk17  Item 4.Controls and Procedures17
**PART II**
  Item 1.Legal Proceedings18  Item 2.Changes in Securities18  Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities18  Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders18  Item 5.Other Information18  Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K18  Signatures19  Certifications20-21
2

**PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION**
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.32 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1868]
[Page 1022]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.32  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1868

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-147) the resolution (H. Res. 170) providing for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1868) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1996, and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2265 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Magna Water District 

water reuse and groundwater recharge project, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2265 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Magna Water District 

3 Water Reuse and Groundwater Recharge Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MAGNA WATER DISTRICT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

6 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h 

7 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. MAGNA WATER DISTRICT WATER REUSE AND 

9 GROUNDWATER RECHARGE PROJECT, UTAH. 

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera11 tion with the Magna Water District, Utah, may partici12 pate in the design, planning, and construction of perma13 nent facilities needed to establish recycled water distribu14 tion and wastewater treatment and reclamation facilities 

15 that will be used to provide recycled water in the Magna 

16 Water District. 

17 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.— 

18 ‘‘(1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of 

19 the capital cost of the project described in subsection 

20 (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of 

21 the project. 

22 ‘‘(2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—Each cost in23 curred by the Magna Water District after January 

24 1, 2003, relating to any capital, planning, design, 

25 permitting, construction, or land acquisition (includ26 ing the value of reallocated water rights) for the 
3 

•HR 2265 EH

1 project described in subsection (a) shall be credited 

2 towards the non-Federal share of the costs of the 

3 project. 

4 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

5 shall not be used for operation or maintenance of the 

6 project described in subsection (a). 

7 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

8 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

9 $12,000,000.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec11 tions in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authoriza12 tion and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. prec. 371) 

13 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

14 16ll the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. Magna Water District water reuse and groundwater recharge 

project, Utah.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2265 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and 

poses. groundwater recharge project, and for other purthe Magna Water District water reuse and ize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to author-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              44,088
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       83,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    80,985
<PP&E>                                           4,205,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                     312,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,282,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               82,317
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         50,000
<COMMON>                                         1,790,157
<OTHER-SE>                                           (897)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,282,226
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   151,765
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      116,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (5,923)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  34,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                            (630)
<NET-INCOME>                                        29,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.22
        

</TABLE>
#### Haines *v.*The Republic Fire Ins. Co.

An exception to the charge of the court stands upon the ground intended when it was taken.

An exception to an erroneous instruction to the jury will be treated as waived, unless, when taken, it is so stated that the ground of it can be understood.

Assumpsit, on a policy of insurance. The evidence tended to show that the application was taken by one Page, who was employed by Webster, Morrill & Co., the defendants’ agents, to solicit insurance for them, and give them information as to proposed risks, and that he received a commission on the premiums on policies issued on risks obtained by him. ' The defence was, that there was a fraudulent over-valuation of the property. The plaintiff claimed that Page was the- defendants’ agent, and that they were bound by his knowledge of the condition of the property.

On this branch of the case, the court instructed the jury as to the duties of agents and how far their acts were binding on the company, and called their attention to the provisions of Gen. St., *c.*159, and stated to the jury that there was no evidence that Page possessed the qualifications required by the statute for an agent.

The plaintiff excepted to these instructions, but did not state the ground of exception. At the time the instructions were given and the exception was taken, the plaintiff’s counsel were not aware that the statute referred to by the court had been repealed, and did not take the exception on that ground.

— Verdict for the defendants, and motion by the plaintiff for a new trial.

*jS. B.*Page, *Burrows*Jewell, and Bingham, for the plaintiff.

Putnam, Carpenter, and George, for the defendants.

Stanley, J.

The only error in the instructions was as to the qualifications of agents; but this is not now open to the plaintiff. The exception was general. The point now taken was not known to or relied on by the counsel at the time the exception was taken. *200Exceptions must stand on the ground on which the party taking them intended they should stand when they were taken. But if, when taken, it was intended to rely on this point, it could not now avail the plaintiff, for the attention of the court was not called to the point now relied on. When an exception is taken to instructions which are erroneous, upon a point which, if made known at the time, would have been rectified, the point must be stated, so that the court can understand the ground of objection, and have an opportunity to correct the error. If not stated, the exception will be regarded as waived. It would be unjust to allow a party to lie by and take the chances of a verdict in his favor, and, if defeated, avail himself of an exception which might have been ■obviated if seasonably known. *Moore*v. Ross, 11 N. H. 547, 557; *McConihe*v. Sawyer, 12 N. H. 396; *Whipple*v. *Stevens,*22 N. H. 219; *Hayward*v. *Bath,*38 N. H. 179; *Heath*v. *Heath,*58 N. H. 292; *Ford*v. *Monroe,*20 Wend. 210.

*Exception overruled.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 15, 2012

|Filer                      | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST OF MURPHYSBORO CORP. | CIC         | Notice by Michael Cripps, Murphysboro, Illinois, individually and as a member of a family control group to gain control of First of Murphysboro, Corp., Murphysboro, Illinois.  The family control group consists of Michael Cripps, Helen Cripps, Sarah Cripps, and Troy Cripps, all of Murphysboro, Illinois. | Newspaper:12/31/2012Federal Register:01/03/2013
|Newspaper:                 | 12/31/2012 
|Federal Register:          | 01/03/2013 
|OZARK BANCORP, INC.        | * 3A1       | Ozark Bancorp, Inc., Salem, Missouri, to become a bank holding company through the conversion of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Progressive Ozark Bank, Savings Bank, Salem, Missouri, from a federally chartered savings bank to a state chartered commercial bank.                                              | Newspaper:12/27/2012Federal Register:12/26/2012
|Newspaper:                 | 12/27/2012 
|Federal Register:          | 12/26/2012 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3520

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Eric L. Smith

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: April 18, 2014

 Filed: April 29, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BENTON and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Eric L. Smith of attempted armed bank robbery, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d); use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii); and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced him to 1

382 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release.

Smith appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his

conviction. He specifically attacks the positive identification by a bank guard. 

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the jury’s verdict, we conclude it is

sufficient. See United States v. Vega, 676 F.3d 708, 721 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of

review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri. 

-2-
Editorial Note on Part 195
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

§ 195.262 Pumping equipment. ( a ) Adequate ventilation must be provided in pump station buildings to prevent the accumulation of hazardous vapors. Warning devices must be installed to warn of the presence of hazardous vapors in the pumping station building.
( b ) The following must be provided in each pump station: ( 1 ) Safety devices that prevent overpressuring of pumping equipment, including the auxiliary pumping equipment within the pumping station.
( 2 ) A device for the emergency shutdown of each pumping station.
( 3 ) If power is necessary to actuate the safety devices, an auxiliary power supply.
( c ) Each safety device must be tested under conditions approximating actual operations and found to function properly before the pumping station may be used.
( d ) Except for offshore pipelines, pumping equipment must be installed on property that is under the control of the operator and at least 15.2 m (50 ft) from the boundary of the pump station.
( e ) Adequate fire protection must be installed at each pump station. If the fire protection system installed requires the use of pumps, motive power must be provided for those pumps that is separate from the power that operates the station.
[Amdt. 195-22, 46 FR 38360, July 27, 1981, as amended by Amdt. 195-52, 59 FR 33397, June 28, 1994]
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.459 External corrosion control: Examination of buried pipeline when exposed.

Whenever an operator has knowledge that any portion of a buried pipeline is exposed, the exposed portion must be examined for evidence of external corrosion if the pipe is bare, or if the coating is deteriorated. If external corrosion requiring remedial action under §§ 192.483 through 192.489 is found, the operator shall investigate circumferentially and longitudinally beyond the exposed portion (by visual examination, indirect method, or both) to determine whether additional corrosion requiring remedial action exists in the vicinity of the exposed portion.

[Amdt. 192-87, 64 FR 56981, Oct. 22, 1999]
From: pamjcam@hotmail.com [mailto:pamjcam@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:10 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Pam Campbell 

9039 Hunter Pass 

Alpine, CA 91901
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of LKA International, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB-A1 for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Kye A. Abraham, President, and Nanette Abraham, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date:5-31-07By:/s/Kye AbrahamKye Abraham, President, Chairman of the Board and DirectorDate:5/31/07By:/s/Nanette AbrahamNanette Abraham, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
#### Same *v.*James Kane, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
§ 69.55 Application for measurement services. Applications for measurement under this subpart must include the following information and plans: ( a ) Type of vessel.
( b ) Vessel's name and official number (if assigned).
( c ) Builder's name and the vessel hull number assigned by builder.
( d ) Place built and delivery date (or scheduled delivery date).
( e ) Date keel was laid.
( f ) Overall length, breadth, and depth of vessel.
( g ) Lines plan.
( h ) Booklet of offsets at stations.
( i ) Capacity plans for tanks and cargo compartments.
( j ) Hydrostatic curves.
( k ) Construction plans showing measurements and scantlings of deck structures, hatches, appendages, recesses, and other enclosed spaces.
( l ) Arrangement plans.
[CGD 89-007; CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31606, June 15, 1995; USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18721, Mar. 31, 2016]
§ 1150.24 Termination of service. The duration of the service may be determined in the contract between the State and the operator. An operator may not terminate service over a line unless it first provides 60 days' notice of its intent to terminate the service. The notice of intent must be: ( a ) Filed with the State and the Board, and
( b ) Mailed to all persons that have used the line within the 6 months preceding the date of the notice.
-----Original Message----- 

From: merrylberryl@gmail.com [mailto:merrylberryl@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Merryl Rothaus 

5228 S. Orchard Terrace 

Seattle, WA 98118
§ 178.337-5 Bulkheads, baffles and ring stiffeners. ( a ) Not a specification requirement.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Order 59-B, 30 FR 580, Jan. 16, 1965. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967]
§ 179.300-8 Tank heads. ( a ) Class DOT-110A tanks shall have fusion-welded heads formed concave to pressure. Heads for fusion welding shall be an ellipsoid of revolution 2:1 ratio of major to minor axis. They shall be one piece, hot formed in one heat so as to provide a straight flange at least 11 ⁄ 2 inches long. The thickness shall not be less than that calculated by the following formula: where symbols are as defined in § 179.300-6(a).
( b ) Class DOT-106A tanks must have forged-welded heads, formed convex to pressure. Heads for forge welding must be torispherical with an inside radius not greater than the inside diameter of the shell. They must be one piece, hot formed in one heat so as to provide a straight flange at least 4 inches long. They must have snug drive fit into the shell for forge welding. The wall thickness after forming must be sufficient to meet the test requirements of § 179.300-16 and to provide for adequate threading of openings.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21355, Nov. 6, 1971]