alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 64.59 Spring loaded pressure relief valve. A spring loaded pressure relief valve must— ( a ) Be set at a nominal pressure of 125 percent of the maximum allowable working pressure;
( b ) Have a minimum normal venting capacity that is sufficient to prevent the tank pressure from exceeding 137.5 percent of the maximum allowable working pressure;
( c ) Close after discharge of a pressure not lower than 115 percent of the maximum allowable working pressure; and
( d ) If closed, remain closed at any pressure less than 115 percent of the maximum allowable working pressure.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 5, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 31.2



                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Paul D. Colasono, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Franklin Credit Management
   Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual
      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: April 24, 2006



By:  /s/ Paul D. Colasono
     --------------------
     Paul D. Colasono
     Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1510.7 Air transportation advertisements and solicitations.

A direct air carrier and foreign air carrier must identify the security service fee imposed by this part as “September 11th Security Fee” in all its advertisements and solicitations for air transportation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice of an intent to grant an exclusive license for U.S. patent application 11/229,425, filed September 16, 2005 entitled “Artillery Rocket Trajectory Correction Kit” was originally published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 20, 2007 (72 FR 39801) and a correction notice was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 27, 2007 (74 FR 41300). The geographical information has been updated. The correct information is: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7(b)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license for all geographic areas including the United States of America and its territories and possessions for any patents or patent applications claiming priority to U.S. patent application.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Russ Alexander, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 876-8743.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3790 Filed 8-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### § 1544.202 Persons and property onboard an all-cargo aircraft.

Each aircraft operator operating under a full all-cargo program, or a twelve-five program in an all-cargo operation, must apply the security measures in its security program for persons who board the aircraft for transportation, and for their property, to prevent or deter the carriage of any unauthorized persons, and any unauthorized weapons, explosives, incendiaries, and other destructive devices, items, or substances.

[71 FR 30510, May 26, 2006]
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.2






                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Board of Directors
Warren Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements,
(Nos. 33-27899, 33-47899, 33-94104, 33-71240 and 333-56625) on Form S-8 of
Warren Bancorp, Inc., of our report dated January 23, 1997, relating to the
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows of Warren Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, which report
appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10K of Warren Bancorp,
Inc.



                                                              KPMG LLP


Boston Massachusetts
March 22, 1999
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 20, 2013

|Filer                     | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|ESB FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC         | Notice of Change in Bank Control by ESB Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Ellwood City, PA; Mario John Manna, Trustee, Coraopolis, PA; Mario John Manna's IRA Account; Claudia Brown Moore, Coraopolis, PA; Claudia Brown Moore's IRA Account; and Dolores Silvestri to retain ownership/control of 17.8% of the outstanding voting shares of ESB Financial Corporation, Ellwood City, PA and of their intent to acquire up to 24.9% of the outstanding voting shares of ESB Financial Corporation which owns ESB Bank, Ellwood City, PA. | Newspaper:08/06/2013Federal Register:08/06/2013
|Newspaper:                | 08/06/2013 
|Federal Register:         | 08/06/2013 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biovest International, Inc. (the
Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Steven R. Arikian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
February 14, 2007



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven R. Arikian                                   
|Steven R. Arikian, M.D.                                 
|Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### § 179.202-3 Approval to operate at 286,000 gross rail load (GRL).

A tank car may be loaded to a gross weight on rail of up to 286,000 pounds (129,727 kg) upon approval by the Associate Administrator for Safety, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). See § 179.13.

[80 FR 26749, May 8, 2015]
#### In the Matter of JAMES H. BAILEY, Receiver, etc., of the Pelham and Portchester Railroad Company.

*Costs*— *a judgment for costs, belongs to the attorney*— *a*receives• *who collects it will be compelled, to pay over the amount so collected to the attorney.*

An action, brought against a railroad company, was successfully defended by art attorney employed by it and a judgment for the costs was entered in its favor. A receiver of the company, appointed in proceedings supplementary to execution during the pendency of the said action, collected the amount of the judgment for costs.

*Held,*that he was properly required to pay the same over to the attorney who defended the action.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term directing the receiver to pay over to Joseph Pool the sum of sixty-nine dollars and thirty-two cents, costs which he had received upon a judgment ■in favor of the railroad company against Ezra Gildersleeve.

The amount of the judgment had been collected by the receiver, who had been appointed in proceedings supplementary to execution during the pending of the action which 'was defended by Pool.

*William E. Walldey,*for the receiver, appellant.

*Harwood B. Pool,*for Joseph Pool, respondent.

Daniels, J.:

Gildersleeve had brought and prosecuted an action against the railroad company, which was defended on its behalf, by Joseph Pool, as its attorney. He was successful in the defense, and the money in controversy was the costs adjusted as the items incurred in the course of that defense. Oases have been brought to the attention of the court sustaining the proposition that a receiver is entitled to collect and receive the debts owing to the corporation, and that its creditors must present their claims to him and receive payment from him, so far as that can be made out of its assets. But these authorities were decided on the rights of creditors having ordinary debts and claims against a corporation. They have no relation whatever to the costs of a successful defense recovered by judgment in the name of the corporation. Such a judgment, consisting *609exclusively of costs, is for all ordinary legal purposes the property of tbe attorney. This was held in *Marshall*v. *Meech*(51 N. Y., 140), where it was said in the opinion that *“*to the extent of the taxed costs entered in the judgment, the judgment itself is legal notice of the lien, and this lien cannot be discharged by payment to any one but the attorney. The judgment debtor pays these costs to the party at his peril.” (Id., 143.) This authority, seems to be entirely decisive of this controversy. As between himself and the attorney, the receiver had no right to these costs, and he was very properly ordered to refund them to the attorney.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs, together with the disbursements.

Beady, P. J., concurred.

Present — Brady, P. J., and Daniels, J.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 To W hom It May Concern

**APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 787** The African Airlines Association (AFRAA), a trade organization of airlines from the member states of the African Union (AU) whose aim is to foster commercial and technical cooperation for airlines and represent their common interest, wishes to register its support for the IATA ’s filing of Resolution 787. We kindly request that the DOT approve the new IATA Resolution 787 (Enhanced Airline Distribution) that was adopted by the Passenger Services Conference during its 18

- 19 October 2012 meeting. AFRAA is satisfied that the New Distribution Capability (NDC) will benefit passengers, airlines, travel agents and distributors. It will offer more choice, transparency and personalization to consumers by

stimulating innovation and competition in the distribution space. Currently airlines are doing this quite well through their own websites but f ind it problematic in providing the same experience when selling via third parties. Many airlines would like to raise themselves to the next level of retailing and merchandising.
The new airline distribution model will change the way an airline distributes its products and services

. The new standards will aim to offer more choice, transparency and personalization to consumers by

stimulating innovation and competition in the distribution space. An airline will be able to respond with price, constructs the offer and intermediary aggregates . The NDC will be an open and transparent process which will facilitate collaboration across the industry

. It will facilitate a more interactive relationship between an airline and customers. This resolution recognizes that a standard proces s is required for airlines to create their own product offer within their own systems which will be provided directly by and owned by

the airline. This will enable more agile pricing and more personalized offerings. In this way, all product offers will be available for distribution through all channels that an airline wishes to sell them through.The industry i s hopeful that new XML data formats will aid in expanding to the travel agency sales channel by

allowing a customer to shop, select and purchase anci llary s ervices or fares packaged with ancillaries , being able to see and weigh differences in competing products, and enabling the provision of customized service and amenity packages.

**Dr. Elijah Chingosho** Secretary General
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VICORP
RESTAURANTS, INC. BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF
JANUARY 24, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-24-1999
<CASH>                                           9,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,060
<PP&E>                                         300,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,327
<BONDS>                                          1,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           455
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,016
<SALES>                                         83,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,093
<CGS>                                           26,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,775
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
§ 178.802 Preparation of fiberboard IBCs for testing. ( a ) Fiberboard IBCs and composite IBCs with fiberboard outer packagings must be conditioned for at least 24 hours in an atmosphere maintained: ( 1 ) At 50 percent ±2 percent relative humidity, and at a temperature of 23° ±2 °C (73 °F ±4 °F); or
( 2 ) At 65 percent ±2 percent relative humidity, and at a temperature of 20° ±2 °C (68 °F ±4 °F), or 27 °C ±2 °C (81 °F ±4 °F).
( b ) Average values for temperature and humidity must fall within the limits in paragraph (a) of this section. Short-term fluctuations and measurement limitations may cause individual measurements to vary by up to ±5 percent relative humidity without significant impairment of test reproducibility.
( c ) For purposes of periodic design requalification only, fiberboard IBCs or composite IBCs with fiberboard outer packagings may be at ambient conditions.
[Amdt. 178-103, 59 FR 38074, July 26, 1994, as amended at 66 FR 45386, Aug. 28, 2001]
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3885

___________ Frank R. Owens, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Verlyn Isaac; Jean Evan; C/O Phillip; * Mike Bickford; William Soupene; * [UNPUBLISHED] Kevin Hagemann; Marilee S. * Giegerich; K. Clark; Stephen Salviati; * Tyrone Bontrager; Raymond Turano; * Samuel Fierro; Larry J. Theilen; Lt. * Pasker; Randy Oldenburger; Tom * Luensman; Dan Dietiker; Steve Lynch; * William Rindy; C/O Baker; Kathy * Condon; Jerry Burt; Steven Wendl; * Jake Noonan, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 7, 2009 Filed: May 12, 2009

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2- In this interlocutory appeal, Iowa inmate Frank R. Owens challenges the district court’s 1 denial of preliminary injunctive re lief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In Owens’s November 2007 motion for a prelimin ary injunction, he sought a transfer from the Iowa State Penitentiary (ISP) to either the Anamosa State Prison or the Clarinda Correctional Facility (CCF). Hi s motion was based on hi s assertion that he and his known enemy were both assigned to the same unit at ISP. Because Owens has since been transferred to CCF, we dismiss his appeal as moot. Cf. Smith v. Hundley , 190 F.3d 852, 855 (8th Cir. 1999) (inmate’s claim for injunctive relief to improve conditions was moot when he was transfe rred to another facility and no longer subject to those conditions).

______________________________