alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      Chief Executive Officer Certification
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John H.
Castle, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

     2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  August 14, 2003


                                        /s/ John H. Castle
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        John H. Castle, Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       E-6
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 122

Travis Dietzler, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Allyson Dietzler, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20210001

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central

Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kelsey L. Hankey, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on 

brief.

Kylie M. Oversen, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

JULY 8, 2021 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Dietzler v. Dietzler

No. 20210001

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Allyson Dietzler appeals from a judgment awarding Travis Dietzler 

primary residential responsibility of the couple’s child, and ordering Allyson 

Dietzler to pay child support. Allyson Dietzler argues the district court’s 

findings under the best interest factors were clearly erroneous and she should 

have received primary residential responsibility of the child. The district 

court’s decision is not clearly erroneous and we summarily affirm under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. 

Gerald W. VandeWalle 

Daniel J. Crothers 

Lisa Fair McEvers 

Jerod E. Tufte
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,542
<SECURITIES>                                     2,922
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,893)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,631<F1>
<PP&E>                                          41,462<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,412)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,887
<BONDS>                                          1,082<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,081
<OTHER-SE>                                    (41,247)<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,803
<SALES>                                         25,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,915<F6>
<CGS>                                           19,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,552<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,808
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,560)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS ON UNCOMPLETED
CONTRACTS OF $1,574 AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS OF $706.
<F2>INCLUDES PORTABLE SIMULATION THEATERS OF $8,390 AND FILM INVENTORY OF $20,760.
<F3>INCLUDES PORTABLE SIMULATION THEATERS OF $4,977 AND FILM INVENTORY OF $15,452.
<F4>INCLUDES THE NON-CURRENT PORTIONS OF CAPITAL LEASES.
<F5>ACCUMULATED DEFICIT.
<F6>INCLUDES INTEREST INCOME OF $842.
<F7>CONSISTS OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF $15,999 AND MERGER
RELATED EXPENSES OF $1,553.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 176.27 Certificate. ( a ) A carrier may not transport a hazardous material by vessel unless a certificate prepared in accordance with § 172.204 of this subchapter has been received.
( b ) In the case of an import or export shipment of a hazardous material that will not be transported by rail, highway, or air, the shipper may certify on the bill of lading or other shipping paper that the hazardous material is properly classed, described, marked, packaged, and labeled according to part 172 of this subchapter or in accordance with the requirements of the IMDG Code (IBR, *see* § 171.7 of this subchapter). See subpart C of part 171 of this subchapter.
( c ) ( 1 ) A person responsible for packing or loading a freight container or transport vehicle with packages of hazardous materials for transportation by a manned vessel in ocean or coastwise service, must provide the vessel operator, at the time the shipment is offered for transportation by vessel, with a signed container packing certificate stating, at a minimum, that— ( i ) The freight container or transport vehicle is serviceable for the materials loaded therein, contains no incompatible goods, and is properly marked, labeled or placarded, as applicable; and
( ii ) When the freight container or transport vehicle contains packages, those packages have been inspected prior to loading, are properly marked, labeled or placarded, as applicable; are not damaged; and are properly secured.
( 2 ) The certification may appear on a shipping paper or on a separate document as a statement, such as “It is declared that the packing of the container has been carried out in accordance with the applicable provisions [of 49 CFR], [of the IMDG Code], or [of 49 CFR and the IMDG Code].”
[69 FR 76180, Dec. 20, 2004; 72 FR 25177, May 3, 2007]
§ 178.515 Standards for reconstituted wood boxes. ( a ) The identification code for a reconstituted wood box is 4F.
( b ) Construction requirements for reconstituted wood boxes are as follows: ( 1 ) The walls of boxes must be made of water-resistant, reconstituted wood such as hardboard, particle board, or other suitable type. The strength of the material used and the method of construction must be appropriate to the capacity of the boxes and their intended use.
( 2 ) Other parts of the box may be made of other suitable materials.
( 3 ) Boxes must be securely assembled by means of suitable devices.
( 4 ) Maximum net mass: 400 kg (882 pounds).
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc. (the issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2003 |  | 
|                       |  | 
|                       |  | 



|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2003 |  | 
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |
#### § 179.202-7 Jackets.

The entire thermal protection system must be covered with a metal jacket of a thickness not less than 11 gauge A1011 steel or equivalent; and flashed around all openings so as to be weather tight. A protective coating must be applied to the exterior surface of a carbon steel tank and the inside surface of a carbon steel jacket.

[80 FR 26749, May 8, 2015]
#### Wells, Fargo & Company, Respondent, v. Erwin Davis, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 19, 1995 (97), Para 97.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1156]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.97.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mrs. CHENOWETH:
       Page 84, after line 17, insert the following new section:
       Sec. 628. None of the funds made available by this Act may 
     be used to provide bonuses or any other merit-based salary 
     increase for any employee of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 
     and Firearms.

It was decided in the

Yeas

111

negative

Nays

317
```
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID Commercial Packaged Boilers Standards Framework: Public Meeting and Webinar486461137

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Oct 01, 2013 08:19 AM EDT 248 Total Attended 23 

# Session Details

First Name Last Name CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Rosalyn Cochrane CA 930 Carling Ave Ottawa ONNatural Resources CanadaK1A 0Y3 Ross Dillon US 1907 central Alameda CA LBNL 94501 David Edwards US 1200 19th Street, NW Washington DCNavigant Consulting 20036 Peter Edwards CA 1277 Tredmore Dr. Mississauga ONPeter Edwards Co. L5J 3V5 joe eysie US 2401 amherst ct boynton beach FL Tactical Energy Solutions 33436 Victor Franco US 1 Cyclotron Rd. Berkeley CA LBNL 94806 Robert Glass US 12680 Lock 15 Road Tuscaloosa AL Raypak Inc. 35406 Geoffrey Halley US 1315 Ridge Road Wildwood MOAmerican Boiler Manufacturers Association 63021 Diane Jakobs US 5600 Old Greenwood RoadFort Smith AR Rheem 72921 Shamel Kassab US 523 S. New St. Eden NCWeil-McLain 27288 Jeff Kleiss US 300 Maddox Simpson PkwyLebanon TN Lochinvar, LLC 37090 Bijit Kundu US 1610 Harrison Street Oakland CA Energy Solutions 94612 Christopher Lau US 120019th St NW Washington DCNavigant 20036 Xianglin Li US 1 cyclotron road Berkeley CA LBNL 94720 Roger Marran US 51 Molasses Hill Rd. Lebanon NJ Energy Kinetics, Inc. 08833 Akwugo Nnama US 77 south bedford street Burlington MANavigant Consulting 01803 Michael Smalec US 200 Court Street Middletown CT DNV GL Energy 06457 judd smith US 8503 Independence OHCSA Group 44131 Trent Thurston US 3524 E. 4th Avenue Hutchinson KS Superior Boiler Works 67501 Detlef Westphalen US 77 South Bedford Street Burlington MANavigant Consulting, Inc. 01803 Linda Wilson US 120 Broadway NY NY NYS OAG 10271 Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500Arlington VA AHRI 22201 Diana Zheng US 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley CA Lawrence Berkeley National Lab94720 

# General Information
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     $932,791
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    $38,494
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        $115,309
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      $165,496
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $1,252,090
<COMMON>                                       $87,775
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     $278,187
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           $120,540
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                $477,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $35,000
<PREFERRED>                                    $21,030
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          $361,829
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   $1,317
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                $355,810
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               $1,252,090
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     $520,277
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           $29,190
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $421,031
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $450,221
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        $70,056
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             $11,419
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 $81,475
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       $26,389
<NET-INCOME>                                   $55,086
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     $3,230
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  $51,856
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       $37,137
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      $14,237
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        $114,478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       $0
        

</TABLE>
Skip to content

Defense Technical Information Center

*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

- Home
- About   - About DTIC
  - Administrator
  - Contact Us
  - Defense S&T Spotlight
  - DTIC’s Past and Future
  - DTIC Strategic Plan
  - Employment
  - Sitemap
- Products & Services   - DTIC’s Products & Services
  - DTIC Registration Benefits
  - DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
  - Training
- DTIC Submissions
- Sign In
- Operating Status

- DoD Privacy Program
- FOIA
- Fulcrum IT Advancement Strategy
- Information Analysis Centers
- Information Quality
- Legal
- Mission Statement
- No FEAR Act
- Open Government
- Plain Writing
- Policy Memoranda
- Privacy Policy
- SAPR
- Strategic Plan
- USA.Gov
- USD(R&E)

Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)

**LinkedIn Icon

(800) 225-3842         Contact Us

8725 John J. Kingman RoadFort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060-6218

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
###### Editorial Note on Part 190

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

#### § 190.221 Civil penalties generally.

When a Regional Director has reason to believe that a person has committed an act violating 49 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.,* 33 U.S.C. 1321(j), or any regulation or order issued thereunder, the Regional Director may initiate proceedings under §§ 190.207 through 190.213 to determine the nature and extent of the violations and appropriate civil penalty.

[Amdt. 190-16, 78 FR 58912, Sept. 25, 2013]
Order entered April 25, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00294-CV

D MAGAZINE PARTNERS, L.P. D/B/A D MAGAZINE AND DALLAS SYMPHONY 

ASSOCIATION, INC. A/K/A DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, Appellants

V.

JOSE REYES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-07308

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s April 6, 2016 motion to strike appellant Dallas Symphony 

Association, Inc.’s notice of appeal and appellant’s response to the motion. We DENY the 

motion without prejudice to appellee addressing in its brief on the merits whether appellant may 

appeal the portion of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment on 

appellee’s claim for tortious interference with contract.

We GRANT the April 6, 2016 opposed motion of appellant Dallas Symphony 

Association, Inc. for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by MAY 5, 

2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### § 1580.5 Preemptive effect.

Under 49 U.S.C. 20106, issuance of the regulations in this subchapter preempts any State law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local security hazard; that is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the U.S. Government; and that does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce. For example, under 49 U.S.C. 20106, issuance of 49 CFR 1580.205 preempts any State or tribal law, rule, regulation, order or common law requirement covering the same subject matter.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2066

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 15, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To amend the National School Lunch Act to provide greater

flexibility to schools to meet the Dietary Guidelines for

Americans under the school lunch and school breakfast

programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2066 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy Meals for

3 Children Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR SCHOOLS TO MEET

5 THE DIETARY GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS

6 UNDER THE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH ACT.

7 Section 9(f)(2) of the National School Lunch Act (42

8 U.S.C. 1758(f)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraph

9 (D) and inserting the following:

10 ‘‘(D) USE OF ANY REASONABLE APPROACH.—

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A school food service au12 thority may use any reasonable approach, within

13 guidelines established by the Secretary in a timely

14 manner, to meet the requirements of this paragraph,

15 including—

16 ‘‘(I) using the school nutrition meal pat17 tern in effect for the 1994–1995 school year;

18 and

19 ‘‘(II) using any of the approaches de20 scribed in subparagraph (C).

21 ‘‘(ii) NUTRIENT ANALYSIS.—The Secretary may

22 not require a school to conduct or use a nutrient
3

HR 2066 RDS

1 analysis to meet the requirements of this para2 graph.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending January 25, 2014

|Filer                                                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE | * 3A3         | The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and two thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/10/2014
|Newspaper:                                                   | Not available
|Federal Register:                                            | 02/10/2014   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: patwagner@alaska.net [mailto:patwagner@alaska.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Pat Wagner 

1397 Great View Lane 

Fairbanks, AK 99712