alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending July 6, 2013

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|B.O.E. BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5* 3A1    | B.O.E. Bancshares, Inc., Lawton, Oklahoma, to acquire through its acquisition subsidiary, B.O.E. Chickasha Corp, Lawton, Oklahoma, 100 percent of the voting shares of Chickasha Bancshares, Inc., Chickasha, Oklahoma, parent of Chickasha Bank & Trust Company, Chickasha, Oklahoma. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:              | Not available
|Federal Register:       | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT
99.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Hydromer, Inc.










Date:
      February 17, 2009
            
            By:
      /s/ Manfred F.
      DyckManfred F.
      DyckChairman, President
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(b)(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, Expedited Review of Tornado Survivors PTSD.                    

*Date:*                         July 31, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         4 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Allan F. Mirsky, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 6157, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9609, 301-496-2551,                         *afmirsky@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 9, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3507  Filed 7-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT
      99.1







CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
      Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended March 31,
      2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Hydromer, Inc.














Date:
      May
      13,
      2008                                                                
By:/s/Manfred
      F.
      Dyck


Manfred
      F. Dyck


Chairman,
      President and Chief
      Executive Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 19, 2013

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|COASTWAY BANCORP MHC | * 3A1         | Coastway  Bancorp, Inc., Cranston, Rhode Island to acquire 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Coastway Community Bank, Cranston, Rhode Island, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, in connection with the conversion of Coastway Bancorp, MHC from mutual to stock form. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/15/2013
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 10/15/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NORTHEAST BK, LEWISTON, MAINE | 468806 | 06/10/2013 | 10/05/2013     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Annie P. Rice, Appellant, *v.*Augustus M. Price, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of John N. Smith, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Rice*v. *Price,*137 App. Div. 894, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second-judicial *503department, entered March 9, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to have certain deeds declared void.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence ; that no question of law was involved and that the exceptions were frivolous.

*David F. Manning*for motion.

*Robert P. Honeyman*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**





I,
      Wang,
      Xiao Jun, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dark Dynamite, Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and





Date:
      March 9, 2007





/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun


Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23

                    [COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
D&N Financial Corporation
400 Quincy Street
Hancock, MI 49930

Gentlemen:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
D&N Financial Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-94076) of our report
dated January 22, 1997 on our audits of the financial statements of D&N
Financial Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of D&N Financial
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.


Coppers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Detroit, Michigan
March 26, 1997
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Rosie Baum, Appellant.

*People*v. Baum, 137 App. Div. 924, affirmed.

(Submitted October 10, 1910;

decided October 25, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 24, 1910, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York convicting the defendant of the crime of petit larceny.

*Isidore Schneider*for appellant.

*Charles S.*Whitman, *District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1794

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994

to double the minimum and maximum penalties for crimes against elderly

and child victims.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1995

Mr. CHRYSLER (for himself, Mr. MANTON, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. SOLOMON,

and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement

Act of 1994 to double the minimum and maximum penalties for crimes against elderly and child victims.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crimes Against Youth

5 and Elderly Double Penalty Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CRIMES AGAINST THE ELDERLY AND CHILDREN.

7 Section 240002 of the Violent Crime Control and

8 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 is amended to read as

9 follows:
2

•HR 1794 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 240002. CRIMES AGAINST THE ELDERLY AND CHIL2 DREN.

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Sentencing

4 Commission shall amend the Federal sentencing guidelines

5 to ensure that the term of imprisonment for an offense

6 where a victim of the offense is elderly or a child is double

7 the minimum and maximum term that otherwise would

8 be imposed for the offense if the victim were not elderly

9 or a child.

10 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section—

11 ‘‘(1) the term ‘elderly’ means having attained

12 the age of 65 years; and

13 ‘‘(2) the term ‘child’ means a person who has

14 not attained the age of 12 years.

15 ‘‘(c) INCREASE IN MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM IMPRIS16 ONMENT FOR OFFENSES.—Notwithstanding any other

17 provision of law, if the minimum or maximum term of im18 prisonment imposable by law for an offense is less than

19 the terms required under subsection (a), the minimum and

20 maximum term of imprisonment is increased for that pur21 pose to the term so required.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1 Q3'13






Exhibit 10.1




July 17, 2013                


To: Keith Sullivan


Re: Promotion


Dear Keith:


The purpose of this letter is to outline the details of your promotion with ZELTIQ Aesthetics Inc. (the “Company”).  Upon acceptance by you, this letter shall constitute an agreed upon understanding between you and the Company.  Unless specifically listed below, all other aspects of your employment with the Company shall remain unchanged.


		
	Effective Date:
	This new position is effective July 17, 2013.




		
	Position:
	Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing, reporting to Mark Foley, President and Chief Executive Officer




		
	Compensation: 
	There is no change to your base salary or bonus participation at this time.




		
	Equity:
	Subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors, you will be granted an option to acquire an additional 30,000 (thirty thousand) shares of Common Stock of the Company pursuant to the Company’s 2011 Equity Plan. The exercise price will be equal to the closing trading price of the Company’s Common Stock on July 17, 2013.  This option will become exercisable (vest) over a four-year period with one-fourth (1/4th) of the options vesting at the end of twelve months, and the remainder vesting monthly at a rate of 1/36th of the remaining number per month thereafter until all shares are vested. The options will be subject to the terms and conditions applicable to options granted under the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, and as described in that plan and the applicable equity agreement.




		
	Employment At Will:
	All Zeltiq employees are employed on an “at-will” basis.  Your employment with the Company is voluntarily entered into and is for no specified period.  As a result, you are free to resign at any time, for any reason or for no reason, as you deem appropriate.  The Company will have a similar right and may conclude its employment relationship with you at any time, with or without cause.




Congratulations and thank you for your ongoing contributions to the Company.  


Sincerely,




/s/ Mark J. Foley                         
Mark Foley, President & CEO




Agreed to and accepted:




/s/ Keith Sullivan                         
Keith Sullivan
Dated:  August 06, 2013
#### § 1584.3 Terms used in this part.

In addition to the terms in §§ 1500.3, 1500.5, and 1503.202 of subchapter A and § 1570.3 of subchapter D of this chapter, the following term applies to this part.

*Security-sensitive employee* means an employee whose responsibilities for the owner/operator include one or more of the security-sensitive job functions identified in Appendix B to this part where the security-sensitive function is performed in the United States or in direct support of the common carriage of persons or property between a place in the United States and any place outside of the United States.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.1003 What do the regulations in this subpart cover? ( a ) *General.* Unless exempted in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart prescribes minimum requirements for an IM program for any gas distribution pipeline covered under this part, including liquefied petroleum gas systems. A gas distribution operator must follow the requirements in this subpart.
( b ) *Exceptions.* This subpart does not apply to: ( 1 ) Individual service lines directly connected to a production line or a gathering line other than a regulated onshore gathering line as determined in § 192.8;
( 2 ) Individual service lines directly connected to either a transmission or regulated gathering pipeline and maintained in accordance with § 192.740(a) and (b); and
( 3 ) Master meter systems.
[86 FR 2241, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### Sam Williams v. The State.

*No. 699.*

*Decided May 4.*

1. . Former Jeopardy.—Where a plea of former jeopardy showed upon its face that the information, to which defendant had previously pleaded, was so fatally defective that it could not form the basis of a legal prosecution and judgment, *Held,*that it was properly stricken out.

2. Same—Practice.—When a plea of former jeopardy has been- stricken out on motion, it is not error for the court to refuse to admit evidence in support of it on the trial of the case.

Appeal from the County Court of Hamilton. Tried below before Hon. John C. Main, County Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction of theft of one banana, of the value of 5 cents, the punishment being assessed at five days’ imprisonment in the- county jail.

Ho statement necessary.

Ho briefs for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the theft of a banana, and given five days in the county jail as his punishment. Former jeopardy ¡Headed by appellant was, on demurrer by the State, stricken out by the court. There was no error in this ruling. The plea showed upon its face that the former information was so fatally defective that it could not form the basis of a prosecution, and a judgment rendered thereon would have been a nullity. On the former trial, after the plea was entered, and evidence partly admitted, it was discovered the information filed in that case failed to negative consent of the owner, whereupon that prosecution was dismissed by the State, over appellant’s objection. There was no error in this ruling. Hor did the court err in refusing to admit evidence on this trial in support of hiS plea of jeopardy. It had been eliminated from the cause, and there was nothing before the court authorizing the proffered testimony. The statement of facts is not sent up in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
Exhibit 32.2




                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of The American
Education Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neil R. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of
the Company.



By:  /s/ Neil R. Johnson
     -------------------
     Neil R. Johnson
     Chief Financial Officer

     May 15, 2006