alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
once_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 




  





13











  






 


 




  





14











  






 


 




  





15











  






 


 




  





16











  






 


 




  





17











  






 


 




  





18











  






 


 




  





19











  






 


 




  





20











  






 


 




  





21











  






 


 




  





22











  






 


 




  





23











  






 


 




  





24











  






 


 




  





25











  






 


 




  





26











  






 


 




  





27











  






 


 




  





28











  






 


 




  





29











  






 


 




  





30











  






 


 




  





31











  






 


 




  





32











  






 


 




  





33











  






 


 




  





34











  






 


 




  





35











  






 


 


36
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 8 (Friday, January 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-37]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5125-N-02]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: January 12, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free); or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: January 4, 2007.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 07-37 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issues this permit pursuant to section 328 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7627, and the implementing OCS Air Regulations at 40 CFR part 55, which incorporate by reference the PSD Regulations at 40 CFR § 52.21 and the Title V Operating Permit Program at 40 CFR part 71. This permit is based upon application materials submitted to EPA by Statoil Gulf Services, LLC (Statoil) dated September 5, 2012, December 7, 2012, January 28, 2013, and June 27, 2013, supplemental submittals and information included in the administrative record for this permit action, and upon the technical analysis performed by the EPA.
#### ROSENSTEIN v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

January 2, 1912.)

No. 1,783.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

George L. Schwein, for plaintiff in error.

James H. Wilkerson, Harry A. Parkin, and Edwin W. Sims, •' ü. S. Atty., for the United States.

Before BAKER and SEAMAN, Circuit Judges, and SANBORN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We find in the record no error of such substance as to require or justify an order for a new trial. Counsel for plaintiff in error,, however, have called our attention to the matter of a proposed showing that the punishment should be less in view of extenuating circumstances which plaintiff in error excusably failed to bring before the District Court. As we have no jurisdiction to adjust the sentence, and as it seems proper that the matter should be inquired into, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for a resentence.
Skip to Main Content
#### § 1145.4 Negotiations.

At least five days prior to petitioning for prescription of a reciprocal switching agreement hereunder, the petitioner must seek to engage in good faith negotiations to resolve its dispute with the incumbent rail carrier.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11148

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOE GARY RIVAS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:02-CR-42-1

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Joe Gary Rivas, Jr., has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Rivas has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow

consideration at this time of Rivas’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel;

such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has

not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 3, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-11148 Document: 00512099500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2013
No. 11-11148

the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d

1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein, as well as Rivas’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 11-11148 Document: 00512099500 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/03/2013
From: downfacedog@comcast.net [mailto:downfacedog@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra Emerson 

820 NE 8th St 

North Bend, WA 98045
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2119

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain

disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic device.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1995

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

require certain disclosure and reports relating to polling

by telephone or electronic device.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO

4 POLLING BY TELEPHONE OR ELECTRONIC

5 DEVICE.

6 Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

7 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new section:
2

•HR 1119 IH

1 ‘‘DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO POLLING BY

2 TELEPHONE OR ELECTRONIC DEVICE

3 ‘‘SEC. 323. (a) Any person who conducts a Federal

4 election poll by telephone or electronic device shall disclose

5 to each respondent the identity of the person paying the

6 expenses of the poll. The disclosure shall be made at the

7 end of the interview involved.

8 ‘‘(b) In the case of any Federal election poll by tele9 phone or electronic device—

10 ‘‘(1) if the results are not to be made public,

11 the person who conducts the poll shall report to the

12 Commission the total cost of the poll and all sources

13 of funds for the poll; and

14 ‘‘(2) if more than 400 households are surveyed,

15 the person who conducts the poll shall report to the

16 Commission the total number of households con17 tacted, and include with such report a copy of the

18 poll questions.

19 ‘‘(c) As used in this section, the term ‘Federal elec20 tion poll’ means a survey in which the respondent is asked

21 to state a preference in a future election for Federal of22 fice.’.

Æ
#### § 176.91 Motorboats.

A motorboat may be transported on board a ferry vessel with gasoline in the tank and two other containers not exceeding 23 L (six gallons) capacity each if they are in the motorboat, closed, and in good condition.

[Amdt. 176-1, 41 FR 16110, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52695, Dec. 21, 1990]
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

Power of Attorney 
 I, Li
Xue, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification Card No.: 532228196412241944, and a holder of 11% of the entire registered capital in Shenzhen E-Sun Network Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably
authorize E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning My
Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders’ meetings of Company; 2) exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Company’s Articles
of Association during the shareholders’ meeting, including but not limited to decide on the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole and execute relevant legal documents; and 3) designate and appoint on
behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive director, supervisor, the manager and other senior management members of Company. 

Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to
execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to
which I am a party. 
 All the actions associated with My Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the
documents related to My Shareholding executed by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE. 

WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and
without giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent. 
 This Power of Attorney is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable
and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as I am a shareholder of Company. 
 This Power of
Attorney is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail. 
  

					
	Li Xue
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Li Xue
	 	(signed)
		
	June 1, 2011	 	
			
	Witness:	 	 /s/ Geng Jin
	 	(signed)
			
	Name:	 	Geng Jin	 	
		
	June 1, 2011	 	


  
 1
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0809(05) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0809(05)

**Notice concerning the countervailing duty and the anti-dumping duty in force in respect of imports into the Community of polyethylene terephthalate film originating, inter alia, in India: modification of the address of a company subject to an individual countervailing and anti-dumping duty rate **

*
Official Journal C 189 , 09/08/2002 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Notice concerning the countervailing duty and the anti-dumping duty in force in respect of imports into the Community of polyethylene terephthalate film originating, inter alia, in India: modification of the address of a company subject to an individual countervailing and anti-dumping duty rate

(2002/C 189/08)

Imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating, inter alia, in India are subject to a definitive countervailing duty, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999(1) and a definitive anti-dumping duty, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001(2).

Jindal Polyester Limited, a company located in India, whose exports to the Community of polyethylene terephthalate film are subject to an individual countervailing duty rate of 7,0 % and an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 0 % by the aforementioned Regulations, has informed the Commission that it has changed its address to 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110 001, India. The company has asked the Commission to confirm that the change of address does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rates applied to the company under its previous address.

The Commission has examined the information supplied, which demonstrates that all the company's activities linked to the manufacturing, sales and exports of polyethylene terephthalate film are unaffected by the change of address. The Commission therefore concludes that the change of address in no way affects the findings of Regulations (EC) No 2597/1999 and (EC) No 1676/2001. In view of the absence of any substantive change of circumstances, the reference to the address of Jindal Polyester Limited, should be read as 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110 001, India, in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 and Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.

The Taric additional code previously attributed to Jindal Polyester Limited under its former address shall remain applicable.

(1) OJ L 316, 10.12.1999, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 227, 23.8.2001, p. 1.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Real Estate Associates Limited V (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 9, 2008      
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 9, 2008      



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 179.300-17 Tests of pressure relief devices. ( a ) Each valve shall be tested by air or gas before being put into service. The valve shall open and be vapor-tight at the pressure prescribed in § 179.301.
( b ) Rupture disks of non-reclosing pressure relief devices must be tested and qualified as prescribed in appendix A, Paragraph 5, of the AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, Section C—Part III, AAR Specifications for Tank Cars (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( c ) For pressure relief devices of the fusible plug type, a sample of the plug used shall function at the temperatures prescribed in § 179.300-15.
( d ) The start-to-discharge and vapor-tight pressures shall not be affected by any auxiliary closure or other combination.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21355, Nov. 6, 1971; 66 FR 45390, Aug. 28, 2001; 68 FR 48572, Aug. 14, 2003; 68 FR 75763, Dec. 31, 2003]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 29, 2012

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|1854 BANCORP         | * 3A1         | 1854 Bancorp, Cambridge, Massachusetts to become a mutual holding company through the acquisition of East Cambridge Savings Bank, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act.                                                                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | Not available
|FRANKLIN BANCORP MHC | * 3A1         | Application by Franklin Bancorp MHC, Franklin, New Hampshire to establish a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of Franklin Savings Bank, Franklin, New Hampshire.  The filing was submitted pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                           | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NORTHAMPTON CO-OP BK, NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS | 149271  | 08/13/2012 | 12/23/2012     | S         | Small Bank 
|START CMNTY BK, NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT           | 3843392 | 07/23/2012 | 11/10/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
99-6.

#### Kimberly Y. v. Charles M.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1163. On motion for stay of judgment of court of appeals. Motion granted; *sua sponte,*discretionary appeal allowed; cause held for the decision in 97-2398, *Cuyahoga Child Support Enforcement Agency n Guthrie,*Cuyahoga App. No. 72216; briefing schedule stayed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: whatnomuffins@gmail.com [mailto:whatnomuffins@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:08 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Michelle Routhieaux 

1213 E Washington Ave 

El Cajon, CA 92019
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.38 Adjournment]
[Page 1112]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.38  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. KINGSTON, at 9 o'clock and 59 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129928 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, KRISTIN BELOTE, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129928 

 COA: 262591 

Oakland CC: 2004-057964-NI 

KEITH STRANGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

d0510 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 17, 2006 

Clerk