alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 

Power of Attorney 
 I, Zou
Ying, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification Card No.:421003197812020016, and a holder of 14.88% of the entire registered capital in Shenzhen E-Sun Network Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably
authorize E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning My
Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders’ meeting of Company; 2) exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Company’s Articles
of Association during the shareholders’ meetings, including but not limited to decide on the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole and execute relevant legal documents; and 3) designate and appoint on
behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive director, supervisor, the manager and other senior management members of Company. 

Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to
execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to
which I am a party. 
 All the actions associated with My Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the
documents related to My Shareholding executed by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE. 

WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and
without giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent. 
 This Power of Attorney is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable
and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as I am a shareholder of Company. 
 This Power of
Attorney is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail. 

 

					
	Zou Ying	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Zou Ying
	 	(signed)
		
	June 1, 2011	 	


  

					
	Witness:	 	 /s/ Geng Jin
	 	(signed)
			
	Name:	 	Geng Jin	 	
	
	June 1, 2011


  
 1
#### § 1560.107 Use of watch list matching results by covered aircraft operators.

A covered aircraft operator must not use any watch list matching results provided by TSA for purposes other than those provided in § 1560.105 and other security purposes.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1994

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for future cost-of-living

adjustments for military retirees on the same basis as applies to Federal

civil service retirees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1995

Mrs. VUCANOVICH (for herself and Mr. STUMP) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, for a period

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for future

cost-of-living adjustments for military retirees on the

same basis as applies to Federal civil service retirees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1994 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DISPARITY BETWEEN EFFEC2 TIVE DATES FOR MILITARY AND CIVILIAN RE3 TIREE COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS.

4 (a) CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE FOR CIVIL

5 SERVICE COLAS.—Subparagraph (B) of section

6 1401a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking out ‘‘THROUGH 1998’’ the first

8 place it appears and all that follows through ‘‘In the

9 case of’’ the second place it appears and inserting

10 in lieu thereof ‘‘THROUGH 1996.—In the case of’’

11 (2) by striking ‘‘of 1994, 1995, 1996, or 1997’’

12 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘of 1993, 1994, or

13 1995’’; and

14 (3) by striking out ‘‘September’’ and inserting

15 in lieu thereof ‘‘March’’.

16 (b) REPEAL OF PRIOR CONDITIONAL ENACTMENT.—

17 Section 8114A(b) of Public Law 103–335 (108 Stat.

18 2648) is repealed.

19 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING FUTURE BENE20 FITS CHANGES.

21 It is the sense of Congress that, in the case of any

22 future change provided by law in the manner of determin23 ing cost-of-living adjustments for Federal civilian or mili24 tary retirees (including changes relating to percentage of

25 adjustment or effective date of adjustment), such law

26 should provide for identical changes in the case of retire-
3

•HR 1994 IH

1 ment benefits for retired Federal civilian employees and

2 in the case of retirement benefits for military retirees.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2001
<CASH>                                          48,268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    641,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               930,453
<PP&E>                                       1,099,281
<DEPRECIATION>                               (611,503)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,509,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,829
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                       235,040
<OTHER-SE>                                     463,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,509,591
<SALES>                                        435,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               435,978
<CGS>                                          229,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  453,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,061)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)




</TABLE>
§ 61.05-15 Boiler mountings and attachments. ( a ) Each valve must be opened and examined by the marine inspector at the interval specified in table 1 to § 61.05-10.
( b ) Each stud or bolt for each boiler mounting that paragraph (c) of this section requires to be removed may be examined by the marine inspector.
( c ) ( 1 ) Each boiler mounting may be removed from the boiler and be examined by the marine inspector at the interval specified by table 1 to § 61.05-10 when any of the following conditions exist:
( 2 ) Where boiler mountings or valves are attached to boiler nozzles and a satisfactory internal examination of these mountings or valves and their attaching studs, bolts, or other means of attachment, can be performed by opening up the valves, such mountings or valves need not be removed from the boiler unless in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, such action is necessary.
( d ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require the examinations prescribed in this section to be made at more frequent intervals, if in their opinion such action is necessary to be assured of the safety of the boiler and its attachments.
( e ) Water columns, gage glasses, and gage cocks must be examined to determine that they are in satisfactory working order.
( f ) Each steam gauge for a boiler or a main steam line may be examined and checked for accuracy by the marine inspector at the interval specified by table 1 to § 61.05-10.
( g ) Each fusible plug may be examined by the marine inspector at the interval specified by table 1 to § 61.05-10.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18890, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9980, June 17, 1970; CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24782, May 10, 1995]
<PAGE>
                                EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
                        BIOPOOL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
           Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
                         Year Ended December 31


<CAPTION>

                                            1996        1995         1994
                                        ----------  ----------   ----------
<S>                                     <C>         <C>          <C>
Primary
  Average shares outstanding             8,027,720   7,907,494    7,880,033
  Net effect of dilutive stock
     options and warrants based
     on the treasury stock method
     using average market price            314,247      84,831       56,386

          Total shares                   8,341,967                7,992,325      7,936,419

          Net income                    $1,295,000  $  141,000   $  705,000

          Per share amount              $     0.16  $     0.02   $     0.09


Fully diluted
  Average shares outstanding             8,027,720   7,907,494    7,880,033
  Net effect of dilutive stock
     options and warrants based
     on the treasury stock method
     using the higher of average
     or year-end market price              478,344     124,358       56,839

          Total shares                   8,506,064   8,031,852    7,936,872

          Net income                    $1,295,000  $  141,000   $  705,000

          Per share amount              $     0.15  $     0.02   $     0.09
</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT.

#### Theodore Martine, respondent, agt. Anna and Henry M. Lowenstein *et al.,*appellants.

*New York, General Term,*

*December,*1875.

*Appearance in foreclosure proceedings.*

The owners of the equity of redemption in a mortgage foreclosure case may appear in the action after judgment by default, for the'purpose of taking care of their interests in any further proceedings which plaintiff may necessarily take.

Under rule 89 the referee’s report in such a case is not confirmed at the expiration of eight days, from the filing, but eight days from the service of notice of filing; and where such notice has not been served upon the opposite party, their exceptions to the referee’s report must be heard.

Appeal from an order denying motion to argue exceptions to the report of the referee.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage appellants were the owners of the equity of redemption. Failing to appear, judgment was taken against them by default on the 14th of May, 1872. Papers on a motion to open the judgment were served on plaintiff May 31, indorsed “ F. W. Townsend, ’ attorney for defendants Lowenstein,” which motion was denied, and an appeal taken from the order denying judgment.

On the 25th of June, 1873, by consent of F. W. Townsend, an order was entered substituting Samuel J. Crooke as attorney for said Lowensteins.

The premises were sold and referee’s report filed September 23, 1873. Mo notice of filing report was given to appellants. October 27, 1873, appellant’s attorney filed *354exceptions to the report, and served copies on the referee and on plaintiff’s attorney.

These were returned with the indorsement that they were served too late, as the report had been filed more than eight days. The motion for hearing the exceptions was denied on the ground that appellant had not appeared in the action until after judgment by default, and that under rule 39 *(Sup. Ct. Rules)*they were not entitled to file exceptions.

On appeal, *held,*that the service of papers, with the indorsement, as above stated, was sufficient appearance; that appellants could appear even, after judgment, for the purpose of taking care of their interests in any further proceeding which plaintiff might, necessarily, take.

Hule 39 of this court requires notice of'filing report to all parties entitled to notice, and that the referee’s report is not confirmed at the expiration of eight days from the. filing, but eight, days from the service of. notice of filing:

Appellants were entitled to this notice, and' it not having been- given, the exceptions were in time and' should have been heard.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Opinion by Davis, P. J.; Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurring.
§ 172.600 Applicability and general requirements. ( a ) *Scope.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, this subpart prescribes requirements for providing and maintaining emergency response information during transportation and at facilities where hazardous materials are loaded for transportation, stored incidental to transportation or otherwise handled during any phase of transportation.
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to persons who offer for transportation, accept for transportation, transfer or otherwise handle hazardous materials during transportation.
( c ) *General requirements.* No person to whom this subpart applies may offer for transportation, accept for transportation, transfer, store or otherwise handle during transportation a hazardous material unless: ( 1 ) Emergency response information conforming to this subpart is immediately available for use at all times the hazardous material is present; and
( 2 ) Emergency response information, including the emergency response telephone number, required by this subpart is immediately available to any person who, as a representative of a Federal, State or local government agency, responds to an incident involving a hazardous material, or is conducting an investigation which involves a hazardous material.
( d ) *Exceptions.* The requirements of this subpart do not apply to hazardous material which is excepted from the shipping paper requirements of this subchapter.
[Amdt. 172-116, 54 FR 27145, June 27, 1989; 54 FR 28750, July 5, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 33712, Aug. 17, 1990; Amdt. 172-127, 59 FR 49133, Sept. 26, 1994; Amdt. 172-149, 61 FR 27173, May 30, 1996; 87 FR 79774, Dec. 27, 2022]
Exhibit 32.1



VISION ENERGY GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Vision Energy Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell L. Smith, the Chairman, CEO and Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Russell L. Smith

Russell Smith

Chairman, CEO and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) and Director



April 13, 2007



The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
-----Original Message----- 

From: newlandnic@aol.com [mailto:newlandnic@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nicole Newland 

812 N. Elm St. 

Denton, TX 76201
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Multi-Fineline Electronix, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Reza Meshgin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas Liguori, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his respective knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                     |  |                                                    |  |                                                                    
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 17, 2009 |  | /s/    REZA
MESHGIN |  | /s/    THOMAS
LIGUORI                             
|                         |  |                     |  | Reza Meshgin President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Thomas Liguori Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
<PAGE>   1


                                  Exhibit 10.12

                                  Amendment to
             Center Banks Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan

        Pursuant to Section 15 of the Center Banks Incorporated Employee Stock
Purchase Plan ("the Plan") and resolutions of the Board of Directors of
Skaneateles Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") adopted on October 28, 1997
authorizing an anti-dilution adjustment to the Plan in connection with a
split-up of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common
Stock") to be paid to shareholders of record as of November 12, 1997 (the
"Effective Date") in the form of the dividend of one share of Common Stock for
each two shares held, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the Plan
is increased to 75,000.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to the Plan to
be executed as of the 28 day of October, 1997.


                                   SKANEATELES BANCORP, INC.




                                   By: /s/ John P. Driscoll
                                       --------------------
                                        John P. Driscoll
                                        Chairman of the Board, President and CEO



                                      -36-
#### Julia Reinhardt, Respondent, *v.*International Railway Company et al., Appellants.

Reported below, 137 App. Div. 927.

(Argued November 14, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss the appeal of the appellant City of Buffalo from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 14, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendants.

The motion was made upon the ground that the exceptions *507of the appellant City of Buffalo presented no questions for review.

*Fred D. Russell*for motion.

*Clark H. Hammond*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending August 14, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

 Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA).

# ACTION:

Open meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of title 5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education (ACDE) is scheduled to be held on September 21, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting will be held at the DoDEA headquarters building, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22306. The purpose of the ACDE is to recommend to the Director, DoDEA, general policies for the operation of the Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS); to provide the Director with information about effective educational programs and practices that should be considered by DoDDS; and to perform other tasks as may be required by the Secretary of Defense. The meeting emphases will be the current operational qualities of schools and the institutionalized school improvement processes, as well as other educational matters. For further information contact Mr. Jim Jarrard at 703-588-3121, or at                         *James.Jarrard@hq.dodea.edu.*

Dated: August 6, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-3909 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M