alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 

135010 

LORENZO C. TOWNSEND, #201112 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

FRANCIS A. KRCMARIK, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

 SC: 135010 

 CoA: 279722 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of October 8, 2007, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

Clerk
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0178

SAT Date: 12/31/2013

Print Date: 1/31/2014

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: 

FATE: 

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, moderate through the 

GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and 

possible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are 

inhaled based on t properties of the PMN material.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.37

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.068

green algal 96-h EC50 0.025

fish _ chronic value 0.005

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.008

algal _ chronic 

value

0.011

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; 

SAR chemical class = ; log Kow 5.45 (EPI); liquid with mp 

unknown (P); S = 0.74 mg/L or dispersible (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs

amide, 

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
** **

UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE****ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended March 31, 2010

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES****EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-12438

 

**REALESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days. 

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Exhibit
10.8




Regen BioPharma Inc.


A
wholly owned subsidiary of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group Inc.


May 18,
2012


 


Wei-Ping
Min, MD, PhD


Professor,
Department of Surgery


University
of Western Ontario


339 Windermere
Road


LHSC-UC,
C9-136


London,
Ontario


N6A 5A5


Canada


 


Dear Dr.
Wei-Ping Min:


 


This letter
is a follow up to our previous discussion about the Scientific Advisory Board for Regen BioPharma Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary
of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group Inc.).  The function of the Scientific Advisory Board is to review research directions that
Regen BioPharma Inc. may undertake, determining those projects which may lead to future developments / advancements in the field
of stem cell therapy.  Other areas may be pursued as well, with advice from this advisory board.


 


You will
receive 200,000 shares of Bio-Matrix Common stock as consideration for participating in telephonic calls / conference calls and
serving on Regen BioPharma Inc.’s Scientific Advisory Board.  The frequency and timing of such calls will be established
on a mutually agreeable basis.


 


It is anticipated
that members of the Scientific Advisory Board will potentially serve as primary research consultants to the Company as such projects
are undertaken.  Compensation for such projects will be either at a rate of $500 per hour or negotiated separately on a case-by-case
basis between the Company and the researcher.


 


Thank you
for your consideration,


 


/s/ David
R. Koos                   


Chairman
& CEO


 


P.S.: Please
sign the bottom of this letter in your acceptance and fax back to me at 619.330.2328.  Also, please email me a copy of your
curriculum vitae in word format.  Any usage of your name in any press releases will be submitted to you for review and comment
before being released to the public.


 


 


/s/Wei
Ping Min                      


Wei-Ping
Min, MD, PhD


(date: May
26, 2012)
Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.72   Filed 11/06/15   Page 1 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.73   Filed 11/06/15   Page 2 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.74   Filed 11/06/15   Page 3 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.75   Filed 11/06/15   Page 4 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.76   Filed 11/06/15   Page 5 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.77   Filed 11/06/15   Page 6 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.78   Filed 11/06/15   Page 7 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.79   Filed 11/06/15   Page 8 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.80   Filed 11/06/15   Page 9 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.81   Filed 11/06/15   Page 10 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.82   Filed 11/06/15   Page 11 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.83   Filed 11/06/15   Page 12 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.84   Filed 11/06/15   Page 13 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.85   Filed 11/06/15   Page 14 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.86   Filed 11/06/15   Page 15 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.87   Filed 11/06/15   Page 16 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.88   Filed 11/06/15   Page 17 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.89   Filed 11/06/15   Page 18 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.90   Filed 11/06/15   Page 19 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.91   Filed 11/06/15   Page 20 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.92   Filed 11/06/15   Page 21 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.93   Filed 11/06/15   Page 22 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.94   Filed 11/06/15   Page 23 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.95   Filed 11/06/15   Page 24 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.96   Filed 11/06/15   Page 25 of 26

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS   ECF No. 22, PageID.97   Filed 11/06/15   Page 26 of 26
#### § 1185.4 General authority.

Any person who holds or seeks specific authority to hold positions with a carrier may also request general authority to act as an interlocking officer for all affiliated or subsidiary companies or properties used or operated by that carrier, either separately or jointly, with other carriers. A carrier may apply for general authority on behalf of an individual who has already received authority to act as an interlocking officer. However, a carrier may not apply for general authority for an individual who holds a position with another railroad which is not an affiliate or subsidiary of the carrier or whose properties are not used or operated by the carrier, either separately or jointly with other carriers.
#### State *v.*Nowell *& a.*

In misdemeanors all participants are principals, and may be indicted therefor either separately or jointly.

Indictment, for an assault of an aggravated nature, containing two counts. The first alleged that the assault was „ committed by the defendant E. E. N., and the second, that the other defendants, E. S. N. and J. A. W., “were present, aiding, abetting, and assisting ” him in the assault.

The defendants moved to quash for misjoinder, and also that E. S. N. and J. A. W. be discharged, because no offence was charged against them; but the presiding justice denied the motions. The *200state asked leave to amend, and charge all the defendants as principals, which was granted, subject to exception. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as to each of the defendants. Motion to set aside the verdict, and also in arrest of judgment.

Tappan, Attorney-General, for the state.

*Copeland $*Fdgerly, for the defendants.

'Blodgett, J.

The offence charged in thfe indictment is a misdemeanor (G. L., *e.*282, ss. 20, 21; *ib., e.*262, s. *10; State*v. Fetch, 58 N. H. 2), and in misdemeanors there are no accessories, but all concerned are principals ; and the distinction between principals of the first and second degree is unknown. 1 Bish. Cr. L. (2d ed.), *ss.*463, 483; 1 Ch. Cr. L. (5th Am. ed.) 261; 1 Arch. Cr. Prac. & PI. (6th ed.) 11.

If, then, as they contend, E. S. N. and J. A. W. are charged as accessories merely, their motion for discharge should have been granted. But such is not the fact; for the indictment alleges not only that they aided, abetted, and assisted in the commission of the assault, but also that they were present at its commission. The effect of these allegations is to charge them as principals, for absence is indispensably necessary to' constitute one an accessory, and in misdemeanors all participants are principals. Being principals, these two defendants properly might have been directly charged as such in the indictment, and thus have freed it from useless circumlocution and surplusage; but it is not for them to complain that they are charged as aiders and abettors rather than as principals, since in either case there is no difference in the offence or its punishment (G. L., *e.*284, s. 1), and no evidence could have been admitted at the trial, or conviction had, by reason of the superfluous allegation of aiding, abetting, and assisting, which would not have been .competent if that allegation had been omitted.

Nor can they complain because leave to amend was granted, for, although it was unnecessary, it neither added to nor subtracted from the offence, and so, at most, was formal simply, and not subject to exception.

The motion to quash for misjoinder was properly denied also. Indeed, it is quite elementary, that if several are engaged in the commission of the same offence, they may be joined in the same indictment, or each may be separately indicted.

The motion to set aside the verdict, and also that in arrest of judgment,

*Must be denied.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, May 12, 1995 (65), Para 65.8 Recorded Vote]
[Page 696]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.65.8  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the foregoing amendment submitted by Mr. LIPINSKI.

It was decided in the

Yeas

247

affirmative

Nays

154
```
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/10143-FR.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/10143-FR.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 1570.101 Scope.

The requirements of this subpart address general security program requirements applicable to each owner/operator required to have a security program under subpart B to 49 CFR parts 1580, 1582, and 1584.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.26 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 652]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.26  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. SHUSTER: Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure, House Concurrent Resolution 64. Resolution 
     authorizing the 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run 
     through the Capitol Grounds (Rept. No. 104-113). Referred to 
     the House Calendar.
       Mr. QUILLEN: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 140. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 961) 
     to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Rept. No. 
     104-114). Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. YOUNG of Alaska: Committee on Resources. H.R. 1266. A 
     bill to provide for the exchange of lands within Admiralty 
     Island National Monument, and for other purposes; with an 
     amendment (Rept. No. 104-115). Referred to the Committee of 
     the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: jmontesdiaz@netscape.net [mailto:jmontesdiaz@netscape.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Janet Montes-Diaz 

4407 Firestone Dr. 

Houston, TX 77035
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.28 Adjournment]
[Page 1139]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.28  adjournment

  On motion of Ms. JACKSON-LEE, at 10 o'clock and 32 minutes p.m., the 
House adjourned until 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, July 18, 1995.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: leahlkane@gmail.com [mailto:leahlkane@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Leah Kane 

1900 Columbia PIke 

Arlington, VA 22204
§ 1018.29 Payments. ( a ) *Payment in full.* The Board shall make every effort to collect a claim in full before it becomes delinquent. The Board shall impose charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs as specified in § 1018.30.
( b ) *Payment in installments.* If a debtor furnishes satisfactory evidence of inability to pay a claim in one lump sum, payment in regular installments may be arranged. Evidence may consist of a financial statement or a signed statement certified under penalty of perjury to be true and correct that application for a loan to enable the debtor to pay the claim in full was rejected. Except for a claim described at 5 U.S.C. 5514, all installment payment arrangements must be in writing and require the payment of interest and administrative charges. ( 1 ) Installment note forms including confess-judgement notes may be used. The written installment agreement must contain a provision accelerating the debt payment in the event the debtor defaults. If the debtor's financial statement discloses the ownership of assets which are free and clear of liens or security interests, or assets in which the debtor owns equity, the debtor may be asked to secure the payment of an installment note by executing a Security Agreement and Financial Statement transferring to the United States a security interest in the assets until the debt is discharged.
( 2 ) If the debtor owes more than one debt and designates how a voluntary installment payment is to be applied among those debts, the Board shall follow that designation. If the debtor does not designate the application of the payment, the Board shall apply the payment to the various debts in accordance with the best interest of the United States as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case.
( c ) *To whom payment is made.* Payment of a debt is made by check, money order, or credit card payable to the Surface Transportation Board and mailed or delivered to the Section of Financial Services, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC 20423, unless payment is: ( 1 ) Made pursuant to arrangements with the GAO or DOJ;
( 2 ) Ordered by a Court of the United States; or
( 3 ) Otherwise directed in any other part of this chapter.
[58 FR 7749, Feb. 9, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 53267, Oct. 1, 1999]
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: Mike Cartney <mcartney@cpv.com>

Date: 7/22/2010 9:55 AM

Subject: Re: Milford Power Project - Plant ID 02542 - Request for Extension

Attachments: pic21480.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Milford Power Company, Milford Power

Project facility. Your request for extension has been denied. The

deadline for your plant to submit Version 4 of the completed

questionnaire remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic21480.gif)

 

 From: Mike Cartney <mcartney@cpv.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: Tom Favinger <tfavinger@cpv.com> 

 Date: 07/08/2010 09:53 AM 

 Subject: Milford Power Project - Plant ID 02542 - Request for Extension

Jezebele,

Milford Power requests an extension for the filing of the ICR. Milford

is still in the process of completing its FERC/NERC mandated reliability

audit and planning for some significant maintenance activities in the

fall.

Due to the above circumstances, Milford wishes to request the maximum

extension possible.

Thanks,

Michael Cartney

Milford Power Company LLC
Vice President and Plant Manager

Phone (203) 882-1010 Ext 227

Fax (203) 882-1515
98-1679.

#### State ex rel. Heddleston v. Mack.

Madison App. No. CA98-06-025. On request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Request denied.
#### § 1542.109 Alternate means of compliance.

If in TSA's judgment, the overall safety and security of the airport, and aircraft operator or foreign air carrier operations are not diminished, TSA may approve a security program that provides for the use of alternate measures. Such a program may be considered only for an operator of an airport at which service by aircraft operators or foreign air carriers under part 1544 or 1546 of this chapter is determined by TSA to be seasonal or infrequent.
#### Elijah R. Kennedy, *Respondent, v.*Samuel L. Harris, *Appellants.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
#### Jane B. Wheeler, *Respondent, v.*Henry S. Dunning, Appellant.—

Motion to strike cause from preferred calendar denied.
From: lamiacanina@earthlink.net [mailto:lamiacanina@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Eileene Muzzarelli 

4244 Laurel Grove Avenue 

Studio City, CA 91604