alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 174.312 HHFT information sharing notification for emergency response planning. ( a ) Prior to operating high-hazard flammable trains (HHFTs) as defined in § 171.8 of this subchapter, a railroad must provide the information described in paragraphs (b) and (c) to each State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Tribal Emergency Response Commission (TERC), or other appropriate State-delegated agency in each State through which it operates HHFTs. The SERC, TERC, or other appropriate State-delegated agency shall further distribute the information to the appropriate local authorities at their request.
( b ) At a minimum, the information railroads are required to provide to the relevant State or tribal agencies must include all of the following: ( 1 ) A reasonable estimate of the number of HHFTs that the railroad expects to operate each week, through each county within the State or through each tribal jurisdiction;
( 2 ) The routes over which the HHFTs will operate;
( 3 ) A description of the hazardous materials being transported and all applicable emergency response information required by subparts C and G of part 172 of this subchapter;
( 4 ) An HHFT point of contact: At least one point of contact at the railroad (including name or email address, title, phone number and address) who has knowledge of the railroad's transportation of affected trains and who is responsible for serving as the point of contact for the SERC, TERC, or other State or tribal agency responsible for receiving the information; and
( 5 ) If a route identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is additionally subject to the comprehensive spill plan requirements in subpart C of part 130 of this chapter, the information must include a description of the response zones (including counties and states) and the contact information for the qualified individual and alternate, as specified under § 130.120(c) of this chapter.
( c ) The HHFT notification must be maintained and transmitted in accordance with all of the following requirements: ( 1 ) Railroads must update the notifications for changes in volume greater than 25%.
( 2 ) Notifications and updates may be transmitted electronically or by hard copy.
( 3 ) If the disclosure includes information that a railroad believes is security sensitive or proprietary and exempt from public disclosure, the railroad should indicate that in the notification.
( 4 ) Each point of contact must be clearly identified by name or title, and contact role (e.g., qualified individual, HHFT point of contact) in association with the telephone number. One point of contact may fulfill multiple roles.
( 5 ) Copies of the railroad's notifications made under this section must be made available to the Department of Transportation upon request.
[84 FR 6952, Feb. 28, 2019]
| Date:                March 30, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   |                                                                                                                                    |
|                                |   | /s/                Ronald Bissinger                                                                                                     |
|                                |   | Ronald                Bissinger                                                                                                         |
|                                |   | Chief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer                                                                      |
|                                |   | (Principal                Executive Officer, Principal FinancialOfficer                and Principal Accounting                Officer) |
-----Original Message----- 

From: bikerpat@mindspring.com [mailto:bikerpat@mindspring.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia Orlinski 

10511 W. Kingswood Circle 

Sun City, AZ 85351
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending November 10, 2012

----

Regulations and Policies            Regulatory Capital Rules -- interagency announcement that the proposed rules issued in June 2012 to revise the current regulatory capital rules are not expected to become effective on January 1, 2013.            -Announced, November 9, 2012            Enforcement            Boscobel Bancorp, Inc., Boscobel, Wisconsin, and Community First Bank -- written agreement dated December 23, 2010, terminated November 2, 2012.            -Announced, November 6, 2012                        Foster Bankshares, Inc., Rolling Meadows, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, November 8, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Exhibit 32 .1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Serge Beausoleil, acting as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Serge Beausoleil

_____________________________________________

Serge Beausoleil, President & CEO

Dated:  August 31, 2009



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Viropro Inc. and will be retained by Viropro Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 20, 1995 (98), Para 98.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1165]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.98.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. SANDERS:

       Page 3, line 3, insert after ``$3,748,000'' the following: 
     ``(increased by $1,000,000).''
       Page 56, line 16, insert before ``, of which'' the 
     following: ``(reduced by $3,000,000)''.
       Page 60, line 15 insert before ``, of which'' the 
     following: ``(increased by $1,000,000)''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

70

negative

Nays

357
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         570,618
<SECURITIES>                                 1,193,152
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,168,865
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,168,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,031,618
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,054,261)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,168,865
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,114
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2621 Testing transfer hoses. Hoses used in LNG or flammable refrigerant transfer systems must be: ( a ) Tested once each calendar year, but with intervals not exceeding 15 months, to the maximum pump pressure or relief valve setting; and
( b ) Visually inspected for damage or defects before each use.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Dark Dynamite Inc (the
      "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wang, Xiao Jun,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun


Chief
      Financial Officer





April
      15,
      2006







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40178

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROGELIO MARTEL-HERNANDEZ, also known as Carlos Zepeda-Cristobal,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1597-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rogelio MartelHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martel-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40178 Document: 00512473419 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40178

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40178 Document: 00512473419 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 2771 1 

AUG 1 5 2006 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

SUBJECT: Guidance for State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submissions to Meet Current 

Outstanding Obligations Under Section 1 lO(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 8-Hour Ozone and 

PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

FROM: William T. Harnett, Director 

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS (C539-01) 

TO: Regional Air Division Director, Regions I-X 

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance concerning the State 

implementation plan (SIP) submissions States should make to meet their currently outstanding 

obligations under section 1 1 O(a)(2)(D)(i). 

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has previously indicated through 

rulemaking what States affected by the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) must do concerning 

emissions that significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 8- 

hour ozone or fine particulates (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in 

another State. This guidance, therefore, addresses what States that are not affected by the CAIR 

should consider in meeting the "significant contribution" and "interfere with maintenance" 

requirements of section 1 10(a)(2)(D)(i), and what all States (inside or outside the CAR region) 

should consider with respect to making submissions to meet the "prevention of significant 

deterioration" and "protect visibility" requirements of section 1 lO(a)(2)(D)(i). Because the 

CAR region differs for purposes of 8-hour ozone and PM2,5, some States may be within the 

CAR region for purposes of one NAAQS, but not the other, and should make section 

11 O(a)(2)(D)(i) SIP submissions that account for this distinction. 

On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated NAAQS for ozone and for fine particulate matter. 

Section 110(a)(l) of the Clean Air Act requires States to submit new SIPs to provide for the 

implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of new or revised NAAQS. Section 1 1O(a)(2) 

lists the elements that the new SIP submissions must contain. Among other things, SIPs for new 

or revised NAAQS must contain adequate provisions to address interstate transport of air 

pollution, pursuant to section 1 1 O(a)(2)(D)(i). 

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov 

RecycledlRecyclable .Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
Exhibit 32.1

                           O'Hara Resources, Ltd.
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
               Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In connection with the Annual Report of O'Hara Resources, Ltd. ( "the
Company") on Form 10K for the year ended April 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the "Report"), I
Robert Vrooman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 USC 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


      Signature
/S/ Robert Vrooman
--------------------------------------
Robert Vrooman
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 21, 2004
#### Samuel F. Cowdrey and another, *Appellants, v.*Jeremiah O’Connell and another, *Respondents.*

Judgment affirmed, witli costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of LKA International, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Kye A. Abraham, President, and Nanette Abraham, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date:March 27, 2009By:/s/Kye AbrahamKye Abraham, President, Chairman of the Board and DirectorDate:March 27, 2009By:/s/Nanette AbrahamNanette Abraham, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
#### Mary Martin and others, *Appellants, v.*Catharine Martin, *Respondent, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Ingalls, J.
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 4, 2014

---





## Forms

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
-----Original Message----- 

From: juliahelenrice@gmail.com [mailto:juliahelenrice@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Julia Rice 

1415 Highland Ave. 

Eau Claire, WI 54701
Exhibit
      32.2











STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China International
      Tourism Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wang,
      Xiaojun, our Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





CHINA
                INTERNATIONAL
                TOURISM HOLDINGS LTD.
              (Registrant)Date: April
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Wang,
                XiaojunWang,
                Xiaojun
              Chief
                Financial Officer








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, April 6, 1995 (57), Para 57.32 Adjournment]
[Page 599]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.57.32  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. SANDERS, pursuant to the special order heretofore 
agreed to, at 9 o'clock and 10 minutes p.m., the House adjourned until 
11 o'clock a.m. on Friday, April 7, 1995.
```
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.283 Plastic pipe: Qualifying joining procedures. ( a ) *Heat fusion, solvent cement, and adhesive joints.* Before any written procedure established under § 192.273(b) is used for making plastic pipe joints by a heat fusion, solvent cement, or adhesive method, the procedure must be qualified by subjecting specimen joints that are made according to the procedure to the following tests, as applicable: ( 1 ) The test requirements of— ( i ) In the case of thermoplastic pipe, based on the pipe material, the Sustained Pressure Test or the Minimum Hydrostatic Burst Test per the listed specification requirements. Additionally, for electrofusion joints, based on the pipe material, the Tensile Strength Test or the Joint Integrity Test per the listed specification.
( ii ) In the case of thermosetting plastic pipe, paragraph 8.5 (Minimum Hydrostatic Burst Pressure) or paragraph 8.9 (Sustained Static Pressure Test) of ASTM D2517- 00 (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7).
( iii ) In the case of electrofusion fittings for polyethylene (PE) pipe and tubing, paragraph 9.1 (Minimum Hydraulic Burst Pressure Test), paragraph 9.2 (Sustained Pressure Test), paragraph 9.3 (Tensile Strength Test), or paragraph 9.4 (Joint Integrity Tests) of ASTM F1055-98(2006) (incorporated by reference, *see* § 192.7).
( 2 ) For procedures intended for lateral pipe connections, subject a specimen joint made from pipe sections joined at right angles according to the procedure to a force on the lateral pipe until failure occurs in the specimen. If failure initiates outside the joint area, the procedure qualifies for use.
( 3 ) For procedures intended for non-lateral pipe connections, perform tensile testing in accordance with a listed specification. If the test specimen elongates no less than 25% or failure initiates outside the joint area, the procedure qualifies for use.
( b ) *Mechanical joints.* Before any written procedure established under § 192.273(b) is used for making mechanical plastic pipe joints, the procedure must be qualified in accordance with a listed specification based upon the pipe material.
( c ) A copy of each written procedure being used for joining plastic pipe must be available to the persons making and inspecting joints.
[Amdt. 192-124, 83 FR 58718, Nov. 20, 2018, as amended at 86 FR 2240, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### Thomas S. Henry, *as*Receiver, *etc.,*Respondent, *v.*Samuel H. Randall and another, *Appellants.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.