alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Seavey *v.*Dana.

The defendant is liable in an action for money had and received for the proceeds of a note delivered to him by a bailee to whom it had been intrusted by the plaintiff for safe keeping.

Both parties claiming title to the money, and agreeing to its deposit in a bank, not to be withdrawn except upon their joint order, or upon a decision of the court made in a proceeding to be brought for the purpose of determining the rights of the parties, a subsequent suit for the money by one of the parties is a proceeding contemplated by the agreement.

Assumpsit, for money had and received. The plaintiff offered to prove that the money sought to be recovered is the proceeds of a note belonging to him, and which he had placed in the hands of a bailee for safe keeping. The bailee delivered it to the defendant, who refused to deliver it to the plaintiff on demand. Subsequently, at a bank in Concord, the maker paid the note, which was then delivered to him by the defendant, and the money was deposited in the bank with a written agreement between the parties that each claimed the money, and that it should not be withdrawn except upon their joint order, or in pursuance of a decision of a court of law, or reference agreed upon, in proceedings instituted for the purpose of determining the rights of the parties. On a later day this suit was brought. The claim of the defendant, that the action could not be maintained on proof of these facts, was overruled, and a verdict for the plaintiff taken by consent, subject to the opinion of the whole court.

*S. Jana,*for the defendant.

*Sanborn 8f*Clark, for the plaintiff.

Allen, J.

The action for money had and received can be maintained against the defendant, if he received the note as money or its equivalent, or if he received the proceeds of the note. *Lord*v. *Staples,*23 N. H. 448, *457; Matthewson*v. *Eureka Powder Works,*44 N. H. 289, 291, 292; *Ainslie*v. *Wilson,*7 Cow. 668. The defendant having received the note from the bailee of the plaintiff *340without his consent, an action of trover against the defendant accrued to the plaintiff, and the defendant having given up the note, and received or authorized payment, the plaintiff could waive the tort, and maintain assumpsit for money had and received. *Mann*v. Locke, 11 N. H. 248; *Smith*v. Smith, 43 N. H. 536. The agreement of the plaintiff, that the proceeds of the note might be deposited in the bank to await the result of legal proceedings, or mutual arbitration to determine the rights of the parties, was not an agreement not to sue, nor a release of any right of action. The decision of a court of law provided for in the agreement could not be obtained without a suit, and the insertion of that provision in the agreement must be construed to mean that legal proceedings were contemplated. No reason appears why the rights of the parties in the note and the deposit are not determined by a trial of this case and judgment. The defendant having submitted the case on the facts which the plaintiff offered to prove, the exceptions are overruled, and there must be

*Judgment on the verdict.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1787 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1787

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to repeal the 
                      saccharin notice requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTICE REQUIREMENT REPEAL.

    Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343) is amended by striking paragraph (p).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# EUR-Lex - 52001AA0009 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52001AA0009

**Opinion No 9/2001 on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the criminal-law protection of the Community's financial interests **

*
Official Journal C 014 , 17/01/2002 P. 0001 - 0015 *

Opinion No 9/2001

on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the criminal-law protection of the Community's financial interests

(2001/0115 (COD) - COM(2001) 272 final)

(submitted pursuant to Article 280(4) EC)

(2002/C 14/01)

THE COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 280(4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the criminal-law protection of the Community's financial interests,

Having regard to the request for an opinion on the proposal, sent to the Court of Auditors by the Council on 29 October 2001 and received at the Court on 5 November 2001,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING OPINION:

The Court of Auditors welcomes the Commission's initiative of a proposal for a Directive on the criminal-law protection of the Community's financial interests, with the aim of replacing and/or integrating the third-pillar instruments with Community acts adopted on the new bases provided by the Treaty of Amsterdam.

The Court notes that this initiative is in line with the recommendation which it made to that effect in its observations on the proposal for a Council Regulation on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and on the proposal for a Council act establishing the Convention on the Protection of the Communities' Financial Interests (observations adopted on 22 February 1995, point 26).

Article 280 EC calls for effective and equivalent protection in the Member States against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community. In the Court's view, the adoption of new Community legal instruments which aim to implement that requirement has the same purpose as the Conventions and Protocols that are in the process of ratification. The latter will, in any case, cover the same field, albeit on a wider scale.

As it pointed out in the aforementioned observations, the Court considers that a Directive is an appropriate instrument for instituting effective protection of the European Community's financial interests.

In the Court of Auditors' opinion more detail must be provided at certain points, in order to afford the fullest and most effective protection possible for the Community's financial interests. The points in question concern:

- the definition of some of those offences,

- certain aspects of the penalties to be imposed by the Member States.

The Court's proposals for amending the Commission's text in that light are presented in the annexed table, with explanations of the reasons for them.

This Opinion was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at the Court meeting of 8 November 2001.

For the Court of Auditors

Jan O. Karlsson

President

>TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000702403
<NAME> DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1981-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         176,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               248,830
<PP&E>                                      39,740,037
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,612,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,827
<SALES>                                        273,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,202
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 26, 1995 (102), Para 102.40 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1204]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.102.40  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. ROBERTS: Committee on Agriculture, H.R. 1103. A bill 
     entitled, ``Amendments to the Perishable Agricultural 
     Commodities Act, 1930''; with amendments (Rept. No. 104-207). 
     Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union.
```
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q


Amendment #1





QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008





Commission File Number: 000-17064





Oasis Online Technologies Corp.


(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)





Minnesota

41-1430130(State of other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)4710 E Falcon Drive Suite 213 Mesa, Arizona 85215(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)





(480) 634-5840(Issuer's telephone number)





Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  X  No___





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large accelerated filer  [   ]
Accelerated filer    [    ]
Non-accelerated filer    [   ]

(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company    [X]





Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ___  No X





As of February 6, 2009, the Registrant had 22,189,542 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding.













EXPLANATORY NOTE





The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”), is solely to correct the indication that the registrant is a shell company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which was indicted in the original filing in error.  No other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q.  This Amendment No.1 continues to speak as of the original filing date and does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date, and does not modify or update in any way disclosures made in the original Form 10-Q filing.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Eric ClickBy:
Eric ClickIts:
Director

Secretary

Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Operating Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,010
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,550
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          47,287
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            47,807
<LOANS>                                        123,604
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,841
<DEPOSITS>                                     162,920
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,640
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,966
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 186,841
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,454
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,102
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,556
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,162
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,376
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,376
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.9
<LOANS-NON>                                        894
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    655
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,805
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       59
<RECOVERIES>                                        91
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,957
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,957
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,730


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### §§ 193.2061-193.2065 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,557
<SECURITIES>                                   175,963
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,149
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,520
<PP&E>                                          24,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 575,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          522,783
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,558
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   575,093
<SALES>                                         18,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.19
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit (23)(a)**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the incorporation by reference in the following RegistrationStatements:     (1) Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-60725, 333-76422,333-81371, 333-84160, 333-84556, and 333-90798) of            Compass Bancshares, Inc.,     (2) Registration Statements (Form S-4 Nos. 333-69524 and333-129940) of Compass  Bancshares, Inc., and      (3) Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-26884, 33-57003, 33-65437,333-15115, 333-15117, 333-66266, 333-67835, 333-86455,           333-90806, 333-101674,  and 333-101975) of Compass Bancshares, Inc.;of ourreports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Compass Bancshares, Inc.,Compass Bancshares, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Compass Bancshares, Inc.,included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPBirmingham, Alabama
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bryon Look, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
LSI Logic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 4,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of LSI Logic Corporation. By:
    
    /s/ Bryon LookName:
    
    Bryon LookTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer

July 21, 2006
§ 179.200-15 Closures for manways. ( a ) Manway covers must be of approved type.
( b ) Manway covers shall be designed to provide a secure closure of the manway.
( c ) Manway covers must be of approved cast, forged, or fabricated metals. Malleable iron, if used, must comply with ASTM A 47 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), Grade 35018. Cast iron manway covers must not be used.
( d ) All joints between manway covers and their seats shall be made tight against leakage of vapor and liquid by use of gaskets of suitable material.
( e ) For other manway cover requirements see § 179.201-1.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21350, Nov. 6, 1971; Amdt. 179-37, 50 FR 11066, Mar. 19, 1985; 68 FR 75762, Dec. 31, 2003]
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### Robert Baker, *Respondent, v.*John McLaughlin, Appellant.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.