alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1809 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1809

  To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to enter into 
arrangements for the repair and long-term maintenance of war memorials 
            for which the Commission assumes responsibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1995

  Mr. Stump (for himself and Mr. Montgomery) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to enter into 
arrangements for the repair and long-term maintenance of war memorials 
            for which the Commission assumes responsibility.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5(b)(2) of 
the Act of March 4, 1923 (36 U.S.C. 125(b)(2)), is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B) In assuming responsibility for a war memorial under paragraph 
(1), the Commission may enter into arrangements with the sponsors of 
the memorial to provide for the repair or long-term maintenance of the 
memorial. Any funds transferred to the Commission for the purpose of 
this subparagraph shall, in lieu of subparagraph (A), be deposited by 
the Commission in the fund established by paragraph (3).
    ``(3)(A) There is established in the Treasury a fund which shall be 
available to the Commission for expenses for the maintenance and repair 
of memorials with respect to which the Commission enters into 
arrangements under paragraph (2)(B). The fund shall consist of (i) 
amounts deposited, and interest and proceeds credited, under 
subparagraph (B), and (ii) obligations obtained under subparagraph (C).
    ``(B) The Commission shall deposit in the fund such amounts from 
private contributions as may be accepted under paragraph (2)(B). The 
Secretary of the Treasury shall credit to the fund the interest on, and 
the proceeds from sale or redemption of, obligations held in the fund.
    ``(C) The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest any portion of the 
fund that, as determined by the Commission, is not required to meet 
current expenses. Each investment shall be made in an interest bearing 
obligation of the United States or an obligation guaranteed as to 
principal and interest by the United States that, as determined by the 
Commission, has a maturity suitable for the fund.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1018.51 Reasons for compromising a claim. ( a ) A claim may be compromised for one or more reasons set forth below: ( 1 ) The full amount cannot be collected because: ( i ) The debtor is unable to pay the full amount within a reasonable time; or
( ii ) The debtor refuses to pay the claim in full, and the Government is unable to enforce collection in full within a reasonable time; or
( 2 ) There is a real doubt concerning the Government's ability to prove its case in Court for the full amount claimed, either because of the legal issues involved or a bona fide dispute as to the facts; or
( 3 ) The costs of collecting the claim do not justify the enforced collection of the full amount. The Board shall apply this reason for compromise in accordance with the guidelines in 31 CFR 902.2.
( b ) The Board shall determine the debtor's inability to pay, the Government's ability to enforce collection, and the amounts which are acceptable in compromise in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR part 902.
( c ) Compromises payable in installments are discouraged, but, if necessary, must be in the form of a legally enforceable agreement for the reinstatement of the prior indebtedness less sums paid thereon. The agreement also must provide that in the event of default: ( 1 ) The entire balance of the debt becomes immediately due and payable; and
( 2 ) The Government has the right to enforce any security agreement.
[58 FR 7749, Feb. 9, 1993, as amended at 81 FR 8852, Feb. 23, 2016]
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11766

 

ANGELES PROPERTIESXI

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.

[X]Yes [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 30, 1995 (90), Para 90.5 Motion to Adjourn]
[Page 1089]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.90.5  motion to adjourn

  Mr. WISE moved that the House do now adjourn.
  The question being put,
  Will the House now adjourn?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HASTERT, announced that the nays had it.
  Mr. WISE objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

130

When there appeared

Nays

263
```
#### § 1540.303 [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending November 24, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location              | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|1ST UNITED BK, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA  | 2860440 | 07/23/2012 | 11/12/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FOOTHILLS B&T, MARYVILLE, TENNESSEE | 3597592 | 07/16/2012 | 11/05/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2013 (January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-2044.

#### State v. Snowder.

Licking App. No. 98CA22. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause consolidated with OS-1779, *State v. Conyers,*Lucas App. No. L-97-1327, and 98-1929, *State v. Schultz,*Hamilton App. No. C-970954.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

FIRST FARMERS ANDMERCHANTS CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 
| Date   | May 11, 2009 |                                                           | /s/ T. Randy Stevens                       |
|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |              |                                                           | T. Randy Stevens, Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |              |                                                           |                                       |
|   |              |                                                           |                                       |
| Date   | May 11, 2009 |                                                           | /s/ Patricia P. Bearden                    |
|   |              | Patricia P. Bearden,  Assistant Treasurer (principal financial |
|   |              | officer)                                                       |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 115 (Friday, June 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33194-33195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Cibola National Forest; New Mexico; Tajique Watershed Restoration 
Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Withdrawal of an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 20, 2004, the Federal Register published a Notice of 
Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 
Tajique Watershed Restoration Project on the Cibola National Forest, 
Mountainair Ranger District (69 FR 51626-51628). The Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) published the notice of availability of the 
Draft EIS in the Federal Register on February 4, 2006 (70 FR 6004). The 
EPA published a notice of availability for the Final EIS in the Federal 
Register on October 21, 2005 (69 FR 61287) and an amended notice of 
availability of the Final EIS on November 4, 2005 (70 FR 67166). The 
project had been developed in accordance with Title I of the Healthy 
Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108-148). After the 
distribution of the Final EIS, the Forest Service received an objection 
during the pre-decisional administrative review period on the project. 
There was no resolution to the objection and the Forest Service has

[[Page 33195]]

made no decision to implement any alternative analyzed in the document. 
The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service is issuing this notice to 
advise the public that we are withdrawing the Tajique Watershed 
Restoration EIS and will not issue a Record of Decision. The Forest 
Service plans to reassess the proposal and determine whether or not to 
propose any activities within the Tajique project area. The NEPA 
process would be re-initiated for any new proposed actions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Lessard, District Ranger, 
Mountainair Ranger District, Cibola National Forest, P.O. Box 69, 
Mountainair, NM 87036-0069, Phone (505) 847-2290, Fax (505) 847-2238.

    Dated: May 22, 2007.
Nancy Rose,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-2975 Filed 6-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Mary Burke, an Infant, by George J. O’Keefe, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, *v.*The London Guarantee and Accident Company, Respondent.

*Burke*v. *London Guarantee*& *Accident Co.,*126 App. Div. 933, affirmed.

(Argued June 10, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 13, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover the amount of a judgment for personal injuries theretofore recovered against an insolvent corporation which at the time was insured by defendant against such liability.

*Ernest P. Seelman*for appellant.

*Frederiolc Hulse*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, IIaiuiit, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

EXHIBIT 32.1 

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BiovestInternational, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Stephane Allard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Dr. Stephane Allard 

—————————————- 

Dr. Stephane Allard 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

May 24, 2004 

 

 

21
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending August 10, 2013

----

Enforcement            ABCT Holdings, Inc., Waco, Texas -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and the Banking Commissioner of the Texas Department of Banking.            -Announced, August 8, 2013                        Bankwest Financial, Inc., Rockford, Minnesota -- written agreement dated July 22, 2011, terminated August 5, 2013.            -Announced, August 8, 2013                        Belt Valley Bank, Belt, Montana -- written agreement dated June 30, 2011, terminated August 2, 2013.            -Announced, August 6, 2013                        Community Pride Bank Corporation, Ham Lake, Minnesota -- written agreement dated September 2, 2011, terminated August 5, 2013.            -Announced, August 8, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending August 7, 2010

----

Enforcement            Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc., Springfield, Georgia -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Banking Commissioner of the State of Georgia.            -Announced, August 2, 2010                        Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc., Flint, Michigan, and Citizens Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation.            -Announced, August 3, 2010                        Community Capital Corporation, Greenwood, South Carolina, and CapitalBank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the State of South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, August 3, 2010                        Community First Bank-Chicago, Chicago, Illinois -- issuance of a prompt corrective action directive with the consent of the bank.            -Announced, August 5, 2010                        Harbor Bankshares Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.            -Announced, August 5, 2010                        New Peoples Bankshares, Inc., Honaker, Virginia, and New Peoples Bank, Inc. -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Virginia State Corporation Commission, Bureau of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, August 4, 2010                        Oregon Pacific Bancorp, Florence, Oregon, and Oregon Pacific Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services Division of Finance and Corporate Securities.            -Announced, August 2, 2010                        Premier Financial Corp., Dubuque, Iowa, and Premier Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the State of Iowa Division of Banking.            -Announced, August 4, 2010                        Progress Bank of Florida, Tampa, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation and issuance of a prompt corrective action directive with the consent of the bank.            -Announced, August 5, 2010                        The Prosperity Banking Company, St. Augustine, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, August 3, 2010            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 7/14/14

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Michael Gordon, EPA Region 3

SUBJECT: 7/14/2014 Meeting with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 

Protection Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection on July 14, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 

2014.

ATTENDEES

Diana Esher, Air Protection Division

Brian Rehn, Air Protection Division

Mike Gordon, Air Protection Division

Emily Linn, Air Protection Division

Kevin Culligan, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Debra Dalcher, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

David Solomon, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Lora Strine, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Brian Fisher, Office of Atmospheric Programs

Joe Bryson, Office of Atmospheric Programs

Jim Ketcham-Colwill, Office of Policy Analysis and Review

Denise Mulholland, Office of Atmospheric Programs

Joyce Epps, PADEP

Robert Reiley, PADEP

Krish Ramamurthy, PADEP

Craig Evans, PADEP

Sean Wenrich, PADEP

Charles Boritz, PADEP

Robert Cook, PADEP

Mark Brojakowski, PADEP

Joe Sherrick, PADEP
<PAGE>   1
                    EXHIBIT 11- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF
                               PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      For The Three Months Ended         For The Nine Months Ended
                                                             September 30,                     September 30,
                                                      --------------------------         -------------------------
                                                        1995             1994             1995              1994
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>              <C>                <C>
Net Income                                          $15,130,361      $12,510,387      $39,657,072        $41,441,100

Net Income per Share                                $      0.46      $      0.37      $      1.20        $      1.21

Weighted Number of Common Shares Outstanding         33,107,380       34,276,614       33,100,867         34,364,106
</TABLE>





See condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.





                                      -15-
#### Charles S. Millington, *Respondent, v.*Welthy T. Dorn, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barker, J.
§ 1144.2 Prescription. ( a ) *General.* A through route or a through rate shall be prescribed under 49 U.S.C. 10705, or a switching arrangement shall be established under 49 U.S.C. 11102(c), if the Board determines: ( 1 ) That the prescription or establishment is necessary to remedy or prevent an act that is contrary to the competition policies of 49 U.S.C. 10101 or is otherwise anticompetitive, and otherwise satisfies the criteria of 49 U.S.C. 10705 and 11102(c), as appropriate. In making its determination, the Board shall take into account all relevant factors, including: ( i ) The revenues of the involved railroads on the affected traffic via the rail routes in question.
( ii ) The efficiency of the rail routes in question, including the costs of operating via those routes.
( iii ) The rates or compensation charged or sought to be charged by the railroad or railroads from which prescription or establishment is sought.
( iv ) The revenues, following the prescription, of the involved railroads for the traffic in question via the affected route; the costs of the involved railroads for that traffic via that route; the ratios of those revenues to those costs; and all circumstances relevant to any difference in those ratios; provided that the mere loss of revenue to an affected carrier shall not be a basis for finding that a prescription or establishment is necessary to remedy or prevent an act contrary to the competitive standards of this section; and
( 2 ) That either: ( i ) The complaining shipper has used or would use the through route, through rate, or reciprocal switching to meet a significant portion of its current or future railroad transportation needs between the origin and destination; or
( ii ) The complaining carrier has used or would use the affected through route, through rate, or reciprocal switching for a significant amount of traffic.
( b ) Other considerations. ( 1 ) The Board will not consider product competition.
( 2 ) If a railroad wishes to rely in any way on geographic competition, it will have the burden of proving the existence of effective geographic competition by clear and convincing evidence.
( 3 ) When prescription of a through route, a through rate, or reciprocal switching is necessary to remedy or prevent an act contrary to the competitive standards of this section, the overall revenue inadequacy of the defendant railroad(s) will not be a basis for denying the prescription.
( 4 ) Any proceeding under the terms of this section will be conducted and concluded by the Board on an expedited basis.
[67 FR 61290, Sept. 30, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 8855, Feb. 23, 2016]