alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,424
<SECURITIES>                                    23,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,424
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,467
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    118,365
<COMMON>                                     1,225,293
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,153,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               374,669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,050)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (637,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (637,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (637,760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0115

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDER KIM TORPPE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 20, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 15 2021

11/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0115
-----Original Message----- 

From: jkoppel1954@gmail.com [mailto:jkoppel1954@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jeffrey Koppel 

4040 North Hills Drive 

Hollywood, FL 33021
FroFrom: sugaree310@aol.com [mailto:sugaree310@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Katharine Fairchild 

2210 Graham Ave Unit B 

Redondo Beach, CA 90278
-----Original Message----- 

From: fwittybsuret@charter.net [mailto:fwittybsuret@charter.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Fred S Witty, Jr. 

900 Miller crest Dr 

Johnson City, TN 37604
From: ARCHIE1099@HOTMAIL.COM [mailto:ARCHIE1099@HOTMAIL.COM] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

THOMAS THIBEAULT 

1908 OAK COURT 

POCAHONTAS, AR 72455
#### Lucy A. Spencer, *Respondent, v.*Huldah E. Spencer, *Appel*lant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs against appellant. Opinion by

Bocees?, J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jmspencer@gmail.com [mailto:jmspencer@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:06 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

John Spencer 

22620 93rd Pl W 

Edmonds, WA 98020
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending February 16, 2013

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. | * 4c8         | Investors Bancorp, MHC and Investors Bancorp, Inc., both of Short Hills, New Jersey, providing notice pursuant to Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act and Section 225.24 of Regulation Y, to acquire Roma Financial Corporation MHC, Roma Financial Corporation, both of Robbinsville, New Jersey, and their wholly-owned subsidiaries, Roma Bank, Robbinsville, New Jersey and RomAsia Bank, South Brunswick Township, New Jersey. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/01/2013
|Newspaper:              | Not available
|Federal Register:       | 03/01/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20704

Summary Calendar

 

HOWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,

versus

CLARENCE O’NEAL BRADFORD; MICHAEL R. BURDICK; SERGEANT DESIMERLY;

D. ELDER; HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT NARCOTICS TASK FORCE UNIT

#19; SMITH, Detective; DOYLE, Detective; JOHN DOE I, Officer;

JOHN DOE II, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees,

DOUGLAS MACNAUL, 

Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-1660

--------------------

November 26, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Howard Johnson, Texas state prisoner # 785828, is

appealing the district court’s orders granting the defendants’

motions for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. This
No. 01-20704

-2-

court “examine[s] the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,

if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987).

The record raises a question regarding the timeliness of Johnson’s

notice of appeal, which requires a limited remand of the case to

the district court for a determination of the date on which Johnson

submitted for filing his notice of appeal.

The district court entered a final judgment on April 25,

2001, and Johnson’s notice of appeal, which was undated, was not

filed in the record until July 2, 2001. Thus, the appeal from the

underlying judgment was not timely unless Johnson delivered the

notice of appeal to prison officials for forwarding to the court by

May 25, 2001. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). 

On remand, the district court must determine whether

Johnson’s notice of appeal was deposited in the prison mailing

system within 30 days of the entry of the order denying the

postjudgment motions, which would be on or before June 25, 2001. 

See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 

This court retains jurisdiction over the appeal except

for the purposes of the limited remand stated above. 

LIMITED REMAND FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 8, 1995 (76), Para 76.26 Adjournment]
[Page 886]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.76.26  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. DORNAN, at 6 o'clock and 26 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
#### § 1540.7 Severability.

Any provision of this subchapter held to be invalid or unenforceable as applied to any person or circumstance shall be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, including as applied to persons not similarly situated or to dissimilar circumstances, unless such holding is that the provision of this subpart is invalid and unenforceable in all circumstances, in which event the provision shall be severable from the remainder of this subchapter and shall not affect the remainder thereof.

[89 FR 35626, May 1, 2024]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending June 8, 2013

|Filer                       | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|OLIVER BANCORPORATION, INC. | CIC         | Change in Control notice by Devon Joan Goetz, Mandan, North Dakota, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of Oliver Bancorporation, Inc., Center, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of Security First Bank of North Dakota, New Salem, North Dakota.                                                         | Newspaper:06/12/2013Federal Register:06/12/2013
|Newspaper:                  | 06/12/2013 
|Federal Register:           | 06/12/2013 
|OLIVER BANCORPORATION, INC. | CIC         | Change in Control notice by Sarah Marie Getzlaff, Bismarck, North Dakota, to retain voting shares of Oliver Bancorporation, Inc., Center, North Dakota, which owns Security First Bank of North Dakota, New Salem, North Dakota, and thereby join the Goetz family group which controls 25% or more of Oliver Bancorporation, Inc. | Newspaper:06/12/2013Federal Register:06/18/2013
|Newspaper:                  | 06/12/2013 
|Federal Register:           | 06/18/2013 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: 1SOLIDSPOT@ATT.NET [mailto:1SOLIDSPOT@ATT.NET] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

DOROTHY SHANNON 

2800 OLIVE ST APT 19-F 

ST LOUIS, MO 63103
98-1673.

#### Shie v. Leonard.

Allen App. No. 1-98-36. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 160, 702 N.E.2d 419. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                  ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Y. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended December 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Hydromer, Inc.



Date: February 8, 2007            By: /s/ Robert Y. Lee
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert Y. Lee
                                      Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
                                      of Finance

                                       12
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel Rooney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                     /s/ Daniel Rooney
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Daniel Rooney
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer of
                                     Superconductive Components, Inc.
                                     March 26, 2004
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1352

_____________________________

DEWIGHT L. DEVAUGHN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

July 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Greg Caracci, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 12, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
97-2647.

#### Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Shafran.

On May 13, 1998, this court suspended respondent, Michael Shafran, for two years, stayed the entire suspension, and placed respondent on probation on conditions. On October 2, 1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s May 13, 1998 order. Respondent did not file a response to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Office.

Douglas, X, dissents.
Exhibit 10.100
  
 Re:
    
    Limited Waiver of Identified Default
  Licensing Credit Agreement Borrower Borrowers Huntington Administrative Agent
 Net Income Before Taxes Financial Covenants Identified Default
   THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK,
     ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBy:
    /s/ David L. AbshierDavid L. Abshier, Senior Vice President cc:
    
    Mark T. Bahlmann
Timothy E. Grady, Esq.
Kevin P. Gildea, Esq.




---



##### 



By:
    
    /s/ Paul D. Colasono

Name: Paul D. ColasonoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
  By:
    
    /s/ Paul D. Colasono

Name: Paul D. ColasonoTitle: Chief Financial Officer