alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Dated:  May 14, 2008 | /s/ John H. Castle                                                                         
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | John H. Castle
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                     |                                                                                            
|                     |                                                                                            
|                     |                                                                                            
|                     |                                                                                            
|Dated:  May 14, 2008 | /s/ Danice L. Chartrand                                                                    
|                     | Danice L. Chartrand
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 20.2


                              A NEVADA CORPORATION

                                February 8, 2005

                     CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY OF RESOLUTION

         The undersigned, Secretary of O'Hara Resources, Ltd., a Corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, does hereby
certify that a Meeting of Directors was held on February 8, 2005, and that the
following Resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors at that time, and the
Resolution is in full force and effect.

         "The Board recognized that O'Hara had entered into a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) dated August 25, 2004 by which O'Hara had agreed to acquire 100%
of Vision Energy Corporation and that on February 6, 2005, pursuant to the MOA,
Vision Energy Corporation had assigned all of Vision Energy Corporation's assets
and liabilities to O'Hara, the former Vision Energy Group had assigned all of
its assets to O'Hara and Gulf Energy Corporation had assigned all of its assets
and liabilities to O'Hara. The Board further recognized, per the MOA, that the
name of O'Hara should be changed to Vision Energy Group."

         Upon motion being made and seconded, the following resolution was
adopted:

"RESOLVED, the Board of Directors hereby accepts all of Vision Energy
Corporation's assets and liabilities, all of the assets of the former Vision
Energy Group and all of the assets and liabilities of Gulf Energy Corporation
and does hereby change the name of O'Hara to Vision Energy Group."



By: /s/ Russell Smith
    ---------------------------
    Russell Smith
    President
§ 178.338-5 Stiffening rings. ( a ) A tank is not required to be provided with stiffening rings, except as prescribed in Section VIII of the ASME Code (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
( b ) If a jacket is evacuated, it must be constructed in compliance with § 178.338-1(f). Stiffening rings may be used to meet these requirements.
[Amdt. 178-77, 48 FR 27704, June 16, 1983, as amended at 68 FR 75754, Dec. 31, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                            5

<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED)
AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1996

<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                     282,787

<SECURITIES>                               810,000

<RECEIVABLES>                            9,152,603

<ALLOWANCES>                                     0

<INVENTORY>                              3,883,750

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        14,650,348

<PP&E>                                 115,666,966

<DEPRECIATION>                          48,306,471

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          84,087,568

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   13,456,146

<BONDS>                                  8,235,367

<COMMON>                                   961,132


<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0

<PREFERRED>                                      0

<OTHER-SE>                              31,159,702

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            84,087,568

<SALES>                                 46,130,596

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        46,199,443

<CGS>                                   41,714,819

<TOTAL-COSTS>                           41,714,819

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           987,809

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,700,935

<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,795,880

<INCOME-TAX>                                     0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,795,880

<DISCONTINUED>                                   0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0

<CHANGES>                                        0

<NET-INCOME>                             1,795,880

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.92

<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.92
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: fanga85@gmail.com [mailto:fanga85@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alan Fang 

19621 Searls Dr 

Rowland Heights, CA 91748
Exhibit 31.4



BROOKSTONE, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Philip W. Roizin, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Brookstone, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Philip W. RoizinPhilip W. Roizin Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Treasurer and Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




Dated: May 27, 2005
From: deb.david.hall@gmail.com [mailto:deb.david.hall@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

deborah hall 

761 Sherman Dr 

marshall, WI 53559
-----Original Message----- 

From: c.roesemann@ymail.com [mailto:c.roesemann@ymail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christopher Roesemann 

16902 East Park Drive 

Cleveland, OH 44119
98-2672.

#### State ex rel. Sterling v. Eleventh Dist. Appellate Court.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2022 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2022

 To require the partial application of the antitrust laws to major and 
                         minor league baseball.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1995

    Mr. McHale (for himself, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Filner, Mr. Bunning of 
    Kentucky, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. 
    McNulty, Mr. Barcia, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Ms. 
 Woolsey, Mr. Orton, Mr. Evans, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Lofgren, 
and Mr. Visclosky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the partial application of the antitrust laws to major and 
                         minor league baseball.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Professional Baseball Antitrust 
Reform Act of 1995'' or the ``Giles Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE CLAYTON ACT.

    The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``Sec. 27. The antitrust laws shall apply to any restraint or 
agreement imposed by professional baseball, major or minor league team 
owners, their agents or employees, on the location of any minor league 
team or franchise.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1544.405 Qualifications of screening personnel. ( a ) No individual subject to this subpart may perform a screening function unless that individual has the qualifications described in §§ 1544.405 through 1544.411. No aircraft operator may use such an individual to perform a screening function unless that person complies with the requirements of §§ 1544.405 through 1544.411.
( b ) A screener must have a satisfactory or better score on a screener selection test administered by TSA.
( c ) A screener must be a citizen of the United States.
( d ) A screener must have a high school diploma, a General Equivalency Diploma, or a combination of education and experience that the TSA has determined to be sufficient for the individual to perform the duties of the position.
( e ) A screener must have basic aptitudes and physical abilities including color perception, visual and aural acuity, physical coordination, and motor skills to the following standards: ( 1 ) Screeners operating screening equipment must be able to distinguish on the screening equipment monitor the appropriate imaging standard specified in the aircraft operator's security program.
( 2 ) Screeners operating any screening equipment must be able to distinguish each color displayed on every type of screening equipment and explain what each color signifies.
( 3 ) Screeners must be able to hear and respond to the spoken voice and to audible alarms generated by screening equipment at an active screening location.
( 4 ) Screeners who perform physical searches or other related operations must be able to efficiently and thoroughly manipulate and handle such baggage, containers, cargo, and other objects subject to screening.
( 5 ) Screeners who perform pat-downs or hand-held metal detector searches of individuals must have sufficient dexterity and capability to thoroughly conduct those procedures over an individual's entire body.
( f ) A screener must have the ability to read, speak, and write English well enough to— ( 1 ) Carry out written and oral instructions regarding the proper performance of screening duties;
( 2 ) Read English language identification media, credentials, airline tickets, documents, air waybills, invoices, and labels on items normally encountered in the screening process;
( 3 ) Provide direction to and understand and answer questions from English-speaking individuals undergoing screening; and
( 4 ) Write incident reports and statements and log entries into security records in the English language.
( g ) At locations outside the United States where the aircraft operator has operational control over a screening function, the aircraft operator may use screeners who do not meet the requirements of paragraph (f) of this section, provided that at least one representative of the aircraft operator who has the ability to functionally read and speak English is present while the aircraft operator's passengers are undergoing security screening. At such locations the aircraft operator may use screeners who are not United States citizens.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report, dated
February 3, 2000 on the consolidated financial statements of Capital Directions,
Inc. which appears on Page 12 of Capital Directions, Inc.'s 1999 Annual Report
to Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in the Capital Directions, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, in the
registration statement on Form S-8 for the Capital Directions, Inc. Incentive
Stock Option Plan.

                                               /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 27, 2000








                                       17
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:




1.
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-160363) of Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc., and




2.
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-165676) of Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc.




of our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.









Los Angeles, California


March 31, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 18th meeting of the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

September 25, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern]

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing gaps in adoption among providers.

                    The meeting will be available via Web/cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​ehr_​instruct.html.*

Dated: August 7, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-3932 Filed 8-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
#### State *v.*Norris.

Whether a temperance camp-meeting is “ a public assembly convened for the purpose of religious worship,” within the meaning of Gen. Laws, c. 273, s. 9, is a question of fact.

Appeal. The complaint is brought under *s.*9, *c.*273 of the Gen. Laws. The respondent kept a booth or tent, and sold lager beer, cigars, and other goods within two miles of the Weirs camp ground, in Laconia, during the session of the New Hampshire State Temperance Camp-Meeting, which began its fourth annual session August 27, 1879. The principal object of the camp-meeting was not religious worship, but the inculcation of temperance and total abstinence from intoxicating liquors; but each session was opened by prayer and the reading of the Scriptures. The other services of the meeting consisted of addresses and lectures on the subject of temperance, and the singing of temperance and religious hymns, and were conducted in a manner similar to that of religious camp-meetings.

The question is, whether this was a “ public assembly convened for the purpose of religious worship,” within the meaning of the statute.

Rogers, solicitor, for the state.

*Wilson,*for the defendant.

Foster, J.

The case presents no question of law. The question of fact is, Was the State Temperance Camp-Meeting, in this case, a public “ assembly convened for the purpose of religious worship”? G. L., *a.*273, *s.*9. The term religious worship having no technical meaning in a legal sense, the determination of this question is within the province of a'jury.

*Gase discharged.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 1251 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

-NM

- 017

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet 

### Inspection 1 .0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 

### 73 $6,205.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products i n compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $6,205 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Co**  **ndition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Inspection, Replacement 6 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field c an also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :