alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00016-CR

EX PARTE JAY ALLEN ROTTER §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F20-2507-431)

May 20, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial court is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 22-7216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00231-LO-1; 1:20-cv-01596-

LO; 1:17-cr-00172-LO-1; 1:20-cv-01598-LO)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7215 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ibukun Oginni, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7215 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ibukun Oginni seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Oginni has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the 

appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7215 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, April 7, 1995 (58), Para 58.8 Speaker and Minority Leader to Accept Resignations, Appoint Commissions]
[Page 602]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.58.8  speaker and minority leader to accept resignations, appoint 
          commissions

  On motion of Mr. WALSH, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That, notwithstanding any adjournment of the House until 
Monday, May 1, 1995, the Speaker and the Minority Leader be authorized 
to accept resignations and to make appointments to commissions, boards 
and committees duly authorized by law or by the House.
  And then,
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: laurent30a@hotmail.com [mailto:laurent30a@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laurent David 

1019 N, 1st Drive, Apt.435A 

Phoenix, AZ 85003
# JavaScript is currently disabled in your browser and is required to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.
From: alex_r07@yahoo.com [mailto:alex_r07@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

alejandro rincon 

6123 fishburn avenue 

huntington park, CA 90255
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40150

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GELACIO ARROYO-BENITEZ

also known as Julio Aguirre-Barrera,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-338-1

February 10, 1999

Before JOHNSON, DUHE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gelacio Arroyo-Benitez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for

being present illegally in the United States subsequent to deportation.

He argues that because the record contains no affirmative showing that

he knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights, the

district court failed to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. He further contends that appellate review of the

voluntariness of his plea is impossible as the transcript of

rearraingment does not reflect his own answers to the court’s questions
2

regarding the waiver of his rights. Arroyo-Benitez asserts that the

district court’s method of taking his plea violates Rule 11, and as

such, his conviction should be reversed.

Arroyo-Benitez does not argue that he did not understand that he

was waiving certain constitutional rights by pleading guilty. Because

he does not contend that his plea was involuntary, he has not identified

any harm or reversible error. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(h), 52.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VICORP
RESTAURANTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AS OF JANUARY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,694
<PP&E>                                         281,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,542
<BONDS>                                         37,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           452
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,567
<SALES>                                         88,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,281
<CGS>                                           31,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (549)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1580.107 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000829092
<NAME> MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           3,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,495
<PP&E>                                         194,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,663)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,818
<BONDS>                                        123,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,658
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,084
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2








Exhibit 10.2




March 14, 2006







Mr. John M. Presley

N23 W28806 Louis Avenue

Pewaukee, Wisconsin  53072




Dear John,




The purpose of this letter is to set forth our agreement regarding your termination of employment with Marshall & Ilsley Corporation (“M&I”).




1.

Medical and Dental Insurance.  By signing below, you agree to subscribe for family medical and dental insurance with your new employer (“New Employer Insurance”), upon attaining eligibility to participate in their medical and dental insurance program.  You will notify M&I once you obtain New Employer Insurance.  Until the earlier of (a) your eligibility for New Employer Insurance or (b) June 30, 2006, M&I will provide you with continuing medical and dental insurance that is subsidized by M&I on the same basis as for full-time M&I employees.  Nothing in this paragraph affects your rights under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (COBRA), which will commence with the termination of your employment with M&I.

2.

Company Car and Release.  In exchange for your execution of the attached release after termination of your employment with M&I, and not revoking the release during the applicable rescission period, M&I will transfer to you the 2004 Lexus GX470, which is your company car.  You are responsible for all income and employment taxes associated with the transfer, and to the extent withholding of such taxes is required, they will be withheld from your last paycheck.  If the amount available from your paycheck is insufficient to cover the withholding, you agree to pay M&I for any excess upon our request.

3.

Compensation Arrangements.  Any options for M&I common stock that are vested as of your last day of employment (March 24, 2006) will be exercisable for three months after your termination of employment in accordance with their terms.  All unvested equity awards, as well as your participation in the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan and any other compensation plans, will terminate on March 24, 2006, and no payments will be made to you thereunder.  Your Change of Control Agreement with M&I dated October 18, 2004 will terminate on March 24, 2006.  Any balances you have in M&I’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plans will be paid to you in accordance with the terms of the plans and your elections thereunder, except to the extent of the balances attributable to the supplemental retirement contributions which are not vested.

4.

Voluntary Termination of Employment.  You agree that your termination of employment is voluntary and thus you are not entitled to any severance benefits under any plan or arrangement of M&I, and that you will not file for unemployment benefits.

John, all of us at M&I have enjoyed getting to know you and your family, and wish you much success in your future endeavors.

Yours truly,




/s/ Paul J. Renard



Paul J. Renard, Senior Vice President







I agree with and accept the above-mentioned terms contained in this letter agreement and agree to be bound by them.




Dated this 14th day of March, 2006.







/s/ John M. Presley         

John M. Presley
-----Original Message----- 

From: palmstrees@gmail.com [mailto:palmstrees@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:20 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Diana Palm 

1096 Lake Road 

Milton, VT 5468
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allen O. Jones, Jr., Senior Vice President and CFO of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1).
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2).
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 
 
 Date:
November 12, 2010
 
 /s/ Allen O. Jones, Jr.Allen O. Jones, Jr.Senior Vice President and CFO
From: dspolasik@gmail.com [mailto:dspolasik@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dianne Polasik 

14420 94th Street N 

Stillwater, MN 55082
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 17, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 17, 1995 (68), Para 68.5 Legislative Line Item Veto]
[Page 749]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.68.5  legislative line item veto

  Mr. CLINGER, pursuant to the special order heretofore agreed to, moved 
to take from the Speaker's table the bill of the Senate (S. 4) to grant 
the power to the President to reduce budget authority, and for other 
purposes; strike all after the enacting clause of said bill, and insert 
the text of H.R. 2, as passed by the House.
  After debate,
  Pursuant to said order the previous question was considered as 
ordered.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EMERSON, announced that the yeas had it.
  The bill, as amended, was ordered to be read a third time, was read a 
third time by title, and passed.
  By unanimous consent, the title was amended so as to read: ``An Act to 
give the President item veto authority over appropriation Acts and 
targeted tax benefits in revenue Acts.''.
  A motion to reconsider the votes whereby said bill, as amended, was 
passed and the title was amended was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
amendments.
  By unanimous consent, House Resolution 147, was laid on the table.
```
#### § 179.202-8 Bottom outlets.

If the tank car is equipped with a bottom outlet, the handle must be removed prior to train movement or be designed with protection safety system(s) to prevent unintended actuation during train accident scenarios.

[80 FR 26749, May 8, 2015]
-----Original Message----- 

From: carrifaber@gmail.com [mailto:carrifaber@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Carri Faber 

2528 Langdale Ave 

Los Angeles, CA 90041
§ 71.50-23 Pre-survey meeting. ( a ) In advance of each AHE, you must conduct a pre-survey meeting to discuss the details of the AHE procedure with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI). If you exclusively use divers to examine the underwater hull plating, the third party examiner must attend the meeting and you must present the results of the preliminary examination. If you use an underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) as the predominant means to examine the vessel's hull plating, then the pre-survey meeting must be attended by a representative of the ROV operating company who is qualified to discuss the ROV's capabilities and limitations of your vessel's hull design and configuration.
( b ) A vessel owner, operator, or designated agent must request this meeting in writing at least 30 days in advance of the examination date.
( c ) The pre-survey meeting may be conducted by teleconference, if agreed to in advance by the OCMI.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21078, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended by USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47382, Aug. 5, 2004]
#### Charles G. Hill, *Respondent, v.*William H. Van Schoonhoven and others, *Executors, etc., Appellants.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
§ 1155.25 Transfer and termination of a land-use-exemption permit. ( a ) A land-use-exemption permit may be transferred from a rail carrier to an acquiring rail carrier without the need for a new application for a land-use-exemption permit if the rail line associated with the solid waste rail transfer facility is transferred to another rail carrier or to an entity formed to become a rail carrier pursuant to authority granted by the Board under 49 U.S.C. 10901, 10902, or 11323. When seeking Board authority under 49 U.S.C. 10901, 10902, or 11323, the applicant(s) shall specifically advise the Board, the municipality, the state, and any relevant political subdivision of a state or federal or state regional planning entity of the jurisdiction in which the solid waste rail transfer facility is located, of the intended transfer. The Federal Register notice concerning the acquisition shall include a statement that a solid waste rail transfer facility with a Board-issued land-use-exemption permit is included in the acquisition.
( b ) When a carrier plans to cease using a facility as a solid waste rail transfer facility, or when a facility is transferred to any party in any manner other than that described in paragraph (a) of this section, the entity that received the land-use-exemption permit must notify the Board, the municipality, the state, and any relevant political subdivision of a state or federal or state regional planning entity of the jurisdiction in which the solid waste rail transfer facility is located, in writing no later than 60 days prior to the proposed cessation or transfer. Upon receipt of that notice, the Board will publish notice in the Federal Register that the land-use-exemption permit will be terminated on the 60th day unless otherwise ordered by the Board.