alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Year Ended December 31                          
                                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 1996                    1995                     1994         
                                        --------------------     --------------------     ---------------------
                                                      Fully                    Fully                   Fully
                                        Primary      Diluted      Primary     Diluted     Primary     Diluted
                                        -------      -------      -------     -------     -------     -------
                                                          (In thousands, except per share)
<S>                                      <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>        <C>
Net Income                                 8,995       8,995        10,417     10,417        3,383      3,383
                                         =======     =======     =========    =======      =======    =======

Average Shares
    Common                                 7,579       7,579         7,430      7,430        7,420      7,420
    Common equivalents                       501         651           289        502           26         14
                                         -------     -------     ---------    -------      -------    -------
         Total                             8,080       8,230         7,719      7,932        7,446      7,434
                                         =======     =======     =========    =======      =======    =======

Earnings per common
    and common
    equivalent share                     $  1.11     $  1.09     $    1.35    $  1.31      $  0.45    $  0.46
                                         =======     =======     =========    =======      =======    =======
</TABLE>


  Common share equivalents assume exercise of stock options and warrants, if
dilutive.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 2, 1995 (60), Para 60.24 Appointment of Additional Conferee--H.R. 1158]
[Pages 628-629]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.60.24  appointment of additional conferee--h.r. 1158

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, by unani

[[Page 629]]

mous consent and pursuant to clause 6(f) of rule X, announced the 
appointment of Mr. Packard as a manager on the part of the House in the 
committee of conference with the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the 
two Houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill H.R. 1158.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointment.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: kdail@optonline.net [mailto:kdail@optonline.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin Dail 

18 Valley View drive 

Rockaway, NJ 07866
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Dated:  November 14, 2008 | /s/ John H. Castle                                                                         
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | John H. Castle
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                          |                                                                                            
|                          |                                                                                            
|                          |                                                                                            
|                          |                                                                                            
|Dated:  November 14, 2008 | /s/ Danice L. Chartrand                                                                    
|                          | Danice L. Chartrand
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 1503.611 Answer. ( a ) *Filing.* A respondent must file a written answer to the complaint in accordance with § 1503.429, or may file a written motion pursuant to § 1503.629(f)(1)-(4) instead of filing an answer, not later than 30 days after service of the complaint. Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, the answer may be in the form of a letter, but must be dated and signed by the person responding to the complaint. An answer may be typewritten or may be legibly handwritten. The person filing an answer should suggest a location for the hearing when filing the answer.
( b ) *Contents.* An answer must specifically state any affirmative defense that the respondent intends to assert at the hearing. A person filing an answer may include a brief statement of any relief requested in the answer.
( c ) *Specific denial of allegations required.* A person filing an answer must admit, deny, or state that the person is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny, each numbered paragraph of the complaint. Any statement or allegation contained in the complaint that is not specifically denied in the answer may be deemed an admission of the truth of that allegation. A general denial of the complaint is deemed a failure to file an answer.
( d ) *Failure to file answer.* A person's failure to file an answer without good cause, as determined by the ALJ, will be deemed an admission of the truth of each allegation contained in the complaint.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 13, 2012

|Filer                                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|AMERICAN FOUNDERS BANCORP, INC.          | CIC           | Notice by Clayton B. Patrick, individually, and as a member of a family control group to gain control of American Founders Bancorp, Lexington, Kentucky.  The family control group consists of Clayton B. Patrick, Liz S. Patrick, Clayton M. Patrick, Carson B. Patrick, and Cooper A. Patrick, Frankfort, Kentucky.     | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/23/2012
|Newspaper:                               | Not available
|Federal Register:                        | 10/23/2012   
|C & J BENNETT FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | * 3A1         | C & J Bennett Family Limited Partnership, Hardinsburg, Kentucky, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 52.29 percent of Farmers Bancshares, Inc., Hardinsburg, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers Bank, Hardinsburg, Kentucky, and Leitchfield Deposit Bank & Trust Company, Leitchfield, Kentucky. | Newspaper:11/13/2012Federal Register:11/08/2012   
|Newspaper:                               | 11/13/2012   
|Federal Register:                        | 11/08/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.7 Message from the President]
[Page 632]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.7  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.
```
#### Fitch M. Davis, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of the Estate of William Bowen, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*William L. S. Olmsted, as Administrator of the Estate of John H. Coyne, Deceased, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

Reported below, 128 App. Div. 915.

(Argued December 7, 1910;

decided December 16, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Apipellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 23, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action io recover possession of assets of the estate of William Bowen, deceased.

*Fletcher C. Peck*for appellants.

*Edwin A. Nash*and *George W. Atwell*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The findings of fact in the decision of the court at Special Term are not without some evidence to support them. They sustain the conclusions of law so far as they relate to the draft issued to John H. Coyne in his lifetime by the Society for Savings in the City of Cleveland, Ohio, for $9,981.70, and that the defendant William L. S. Olmsted, as administrator of the estate of John H. Coyne, deceased, and the defendant Edward P. Coyne are liable to the plaintiff for the amount thereof with interest. The findings of fact relating to the payment by the executor of the last will and testament of William Bowen, deceased, to John H. Coyne of $1,000 do not sustain the conclusion of law that defendant William L. S. Olmsted, as the administrator of the estate of John H. Coyne, deceased, is liable to the plaintiff therefor.

It is found that the $1,000 was paid in full or in .part payment for professional services alleged to have been rendered by John II. Coyne to William Bowen in his lifetime, or to his estate after his decease. It is not found that there was any fraud or bad faith in procuring such payment, or that the *558estate of said Bowen was not at that time indebted to said Coyne for professional services in an amount equal to or greater than $1,000, and it is not shown that the plaintiff ever demanded- of said defendant that he return said $1,000 to him.

The judgment as against the defendant William L. S. Olmsted, as administrator of the estate of John Ii. Coyne, deceased, should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless .the plaintiff stipulates within twenty days to reduce the judgment as against William L. S. Olmsted, as administrator as aforesaid, by the amount of $1,000, and interest thereon from October 10th, 1899, in which case the judgment as so reduced is affirmed, without costs in this court to either party.

The judgment as against the defendant Edward P. Coyne should be affirmed, with costs.

Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending August 3, 2013

|Filer                                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|MUTUAL FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF PLYMOUTH COUNTY | Member         | Application by Mutual Bank, Whitman, Massachusetts, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act and section 208.3 of Regulation H. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: bach@berkeley.edu [mailto:bach@berkeley.edu] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Larry Bach 

2401 Fulton Street 

Berkeley, CA 94704
-----Original Message----- 

From: BEECHERLTY@COMCAST.NET [mailto:BEECHERLTY@COMCAST.NET] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

JANE MERRIFIELD-BEECHER 

5208 n camino de la cumbre 

TUCSON, AZ 85750
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of                    the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                    |                                                                                          |                                      |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    | DARK                    DYNAMITE, INC.(Registrant)                                            |
|                                                               |                                                                                     |                                 |
| Date: November                    22, 2005     | By:                                                                                 | /s/ Wang,                    Xiaojun |
|                                                                    | Wang,                    XiaojunChief                    Financial                    Officer |
§ 327.22 Who may present claims. ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) A claim for property loss or damage may be presented by anyone having an interest in the property, including an insurer or other subrogee.
( 2 ) A claim for personal injury may be presented by the person injured.
( 3 ) A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decedent's estate, or any other person legally entitled to assert such a claim under local law. The claimant's status must be stated in the claim.
( 4 ) A claim for medical, hospital, or burial expenses may be presented by any person who by reason of family relationship has, in fact, incurred the expenses.
( b ) A joint claim must be presented in the names of and signed by, the joint claimants, and the settlement will be made payable to the joint claimants.
( c ) A claim may be presented by a duly authorized agent, legal representative or survivor, if it is presented in the name of the claimant. If the claim is not signed by the claimant, the agent, legal representative, or survivor shall indicate their title or legal capacity and provide evidence of their authority to present the claim.
( d ) Where the same claimant has a claim for damage to or loss of property and a claim for personal injury or a claim based on death arising out of the same incident, they must be combined in one claim.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending July 21, 2012

----

Testimony and Statements            Monetary Policy -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs on July 17, and before the House Committee on Financial Services on July 18, 2012, on the semiannual monetary policy report to the Congress.            -Published, July 17, 2012            Regulations and Policies            Prepaid Cards -- report to Congress on government-administered, general-use prepaid cards, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, July 12, 2012            (A/C)          Enforcement            Premier Financial Corp., Dubuque, Iowa, and Premier Bank -- written agreement dated July 28, 2010, terminated July 11, 2012.            -Announced, July 19, 2012                        TCB Holding Company, The Woodlands, Texas -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.            -Announced, July 17, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
98-2462.

#### State v. Childs.

Montgomery App. No. CA 16325. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry dated October 19, 1998:

“This matter comes before the court upon the application of plaintiff-appellee the State of Ohio for certification that our judgment rendered herein on September 11, 1998, is in conflict with judgments rendered by courts of appeals for Summit County in *State v. Dapice*(1989), 57 Ohio App.3d 99 [566 N.E.2d 1261], and for Stark County in *State v. Blackshear*(May 22, 1989), Stark App. No. CA 7658, unreported [1989 WL 63270], We have reviewed those judgments, and we are satisfied that our judgment is in conflict with both of them. Accordingly, pursuant to Article IV, Section 3(B)(4) of the Ohio Constitution, we certify that our judgment in this appeal is in conflict with the judgments cited above. The question certified is as follows:

“Does R.C. 2923.01(B) require an indictment or other instrument charging a conspiracy to allege at least one specific, substantial, overt act performed in furtherance of the conspiracy?”

*Sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 98-2227, *infra.*

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents to the above.