alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: realityisnowhere@att.net [mailto:realityisnowhere@att.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

steve kaslikowski 

2150 fell street 

San Francisco, CA 94117
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1137]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. STEARNS:

       Page 72, line 19, strike ``$82,259,000'' and insert 
     ``$74,033,100''.
       Page 73, line 4, strike ``$17,235,000'' and insert 
     ``$15,511,500''.
       Page 73, line 6, strike ``$7,500,000'' and insert 
     ``$6,750,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

179

negative

Nays

227
```
#### Hiland A. Weed, *as Administrator, Appellant, v.*Alonzo Hornby and another, *Respondents.*

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to abide event. Opinion by

Dwight, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**SMASH PA, INC.,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**LEHIGH VALLEY RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND BARLEY SNYDER,** 
**LLP,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 552 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Subsidiary                                     Jurisdiction of incorporation

NTELOS Acquisition Corp.                                   Virginia

NTELOS Cable Inc.                                          Virginia

NTELOS Cable of Virginia Inc.                              Virginia

NTELOS Communications Services Inc.                        Virginia

NTELOS Cornerstone Inc.                                    Virginia

NTELOS Licenses Inc.                                       Virginia

NTELOS Network Inc.                                        Virginia

NTELOS PCS Inc.                                            Virginia

NTELOS Telephone Inc.                                      Virginia

NTELOS Wireless Inc.                                       Virginia

NTELOS of Maryland Inc.                                    Virginia

NTELOS of Kentucky Inc.                                    Virginia

NTELOS NetAccess Inc.                                      Virginia

NTELOS PCS North Inc.                                      Virginia

NA Communications Inc.                                     Virginia

Virginia RSA 6 Cellular Limited Ptrshp.                    Virginia

Richmond 20 MHz, LLC                                       Delaware

R&B Communications, Inc.                                   Virginia

Botetourt Leasing, Inc.                                    Virginia

Roanoke & Botetourt Telephone Co.                          Virginia

R&B Cable, Inc.                                            Virginia

R&B Network, Inc.                                          Virginia

The Beeper Company                                         Virginia

Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C                                 Virginia

West Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C                            Virginia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          594,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     49,847
<COMMON>                                       753,494
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,390,081)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,984
<SALES>                                         13,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            5,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               997,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,028,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,030,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                486,453
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (543,980)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THERAPY LASERS, INC. AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,763
<PP&E>                                           1,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (809)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,363
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,634)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,954
<SALES>                                         62,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,170
<CGS>                                           45,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 27,586
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.001
        

</TABLE>
#### § 178.1 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes the manufacturing and testing specifications for packaging and containers used for the transportation of hazardous materials in commerce.

[Amdt. 178-40, 42 FR 2689, Jan. 13, 1977. Redesignated by Amdt. 178-97, 55 FR 52715, Dec. 21, 1990]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1910

To permit the current refunding of certain tax-exempt bonds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 1995

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To permit the current refunding of certain tax-exempt bonds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CURRENT REFUNDINGS OF CERTAIN TAX4 EXEMPT BONDS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 10632

6 of the Revenue Act of 1987 (relating to bonds issued by

7 Indian tribal governments) is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new sentence: ‘‘The amendments made

9 by this section shall not apply to any obligation issued

10 after such date if—
2

•HR 1910 IH

1 ‘‘(1) such obligation is issued (or is part of a

2 series of obligations issued) to refund an obligation

3 issued on or before such date,

4 ‘‘(2) the average maturity date of the issue of

5 which the refunding obligation is a part is not later

6 than the average maturity date of the obligations to

7 be refunded by such issue,

8 ‘‘(3) the amount of the refunding obligation

9 does not exceed the outstanding amount of the re10 funded obligation, and

11 ‘‘(4) the net proceeds of the refunding obliga12 tion are used to redeem the refunded obligation not

13 later than 90 days after the date of the issuance of

14 the refunding obligation.

15 For purposes of paragraph (2), average maturity shall be

16 determined in accordance with section 147(b)(2)(A) of the

17 Internal Revenue Code of 1986.’’

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply to refunding obligations issued

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
      99.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







I,
      Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended December 31,
      2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
      fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
      of
      operations of Hydromer, Inc.













Date:
                February 6, 2006
            By:_/s/
                Manfred F. DyckManfred
                F. DyckChairman,
                President and Chief Executive Officer
#### John Rape v. The State.

*No. 775.*

*Decided June 19.*

1. Assault and Battery—Information—Name of Injured Party—Idem Sonans.—In an information for assault and battery, where the name of the injured party was alleged to be “Garzia,” and the proof was that his name was “ Garcia,” *Held,*idem sonans.

3. Principals—Evidence of Declarations and Acts of Coprincipal.—Where several parties agree to commit an offense which is a misdemeanor, all the guilty participants are principals, and the acts and declarations of one are the acts and declarations of all, and admissible in evidence against all.' Following Houston v. The State, 13 Texas Criminal Appeals, 595.

Appeal from the County Court of Bee. Tried below before the Hon. Felix J. Hart, County Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for simple assault, the punishment assessed being a fine of $5.

Ho statement necessary.

Ho brief for appellant has come to the hands of the Reporter.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Conviction of assault and battery, the fine assessed being $5.

Information charges the name of the assaulted party to be “Secundio Garzia.” It is contended the evidence shows it to be “Secundio Garcia.” The rule of idem sonans here applies, we think, and it is shown beyond question that he was. the assaulted party, and also that the Mexican name “Garzia” is by Americans generally called “Garza,” and the witnesses did not know whether “z” was pronounced as “c” or not, or vice versa.

Several witnesses were allowed to state to the jury, that on the night of the alleged assault in this case a crowd of some thirty or forty persons ran from a tent in Beeville, Texas, to Fritz Leverman’s place of business, and the acts and words of said persons during said time, and at Fritz Leverman’s place of business, to all of which defendant ob*616jected. This bill does not state the acts or words of the crowd. We áre left to conjecture as to what these acts and words were. If we could supply this deficiency in the bill from the evidence, we might suppose that defendant, with the crowd, pursued the injured party between the points designated, and was the nearest person to him as he entered the place of Leverman. He was a principal in the entire transaction, from its incipiency to its close, under the facts before us.

All the evidence before us was properly admitted. There was an agreement between these parties to run the Mexicans out of town. They chased the Mexicans about the town, and several Mexicans were wounded in the melee. The act of one was the act of all, under the case made by the record- This being a misdemeanor, all guilty participants were principals. Houston v. The State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 595.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
§ 179.200-22 Test of tanks. ( a ) Each tank shall be tested by completely filling the tank and dome or nozzles with water, or other liquid having similar viscosity, of a temperature which shall not exceed 100 °F. during the test; and applying the pressure prescribed in § 179.201-1. Tank shall hold the prescribed pressure for at least 10 minutes without leakage or evidence of distress. All rivets and closures, except safety relief valves or safety vents, shall be in place when test is made.
( b ) Insulated tanks shall be tested before insulation is applied.
( c ) Rubber-lined tanks shall be tested before rubber lining is applied.
( d ) Caulking of welded joints to stop leaks developed during the foregoing tests is prohibited. Repairs in welded joints shall be made as prescribed in AAR Specifications for Tank Cars, appendix W (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964, as amended at 68 FR 75762, Dec. 31, 2003]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1898 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1898

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to direct the Secretary 
of the Interior to cease mineral leasing activity on submerged land of 
 the Outer Continental Shelf that is adjacent to a coastal State that 
  has declared a moratorium on such activity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1995

  Mr. Miller of California (for himself, Mr. Fazio of California, Mr. 
 Matsui, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Lantos, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Farr, Mr. Waxman, Mr. 
    Torres, Mr. Serrano, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Studds, Mr. Johnston of 
   Florida, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Mineta, Mr. 
 Dellums, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Pallone, and Mr. Beilenson) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to direct the Secretary 
of the Interior to cease mineral leasing activity on submerged land of 
 the Outer Continental Shelf that is adjacent to a coastal State that 
  has declared a moratorium on such activity, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coastal States Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE MORATORIA ON OFFSHORE MINERAL LEASING.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) State Moratoria.--When there is in effect with respect to 
lands beneath navigable waters of a coastal State a moratorium on oil, 
gas, or other mineral exploration, development, or production 
activities established by statute or by order of the Governor, the 
Secretary shall not issue a lease for the exploration, development, or 
production of minerals on submerged lands of the Outer Continental 
Shelf that are seaward of or adjacent to those lands.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard C. Adkerson, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 23, 2013



/s/ Richard C. AdkersonRichard C. AdkersonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Argued and submitted February 28,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration October 11, 1995

#### MICHAEL GERALD AINSWORTH, *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, *Respondent.*

(CA A82315)

903 P2d 418

Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Robert K. Lau, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Fernandez v. Board of Parole,*137 Or App 247, 904 P2d 1071 (1995).
Exhibit 99(a)



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel Rooney, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



                            /s/ Daniel Rooney
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                            Daniel Rooney, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                            President of Superconductive Components, Inc.
                            March 28, 2003
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-1220 

________________________________________________________________________ 

BOUNDARY WATERS 

 

 Minute No. 318 of the 

International Boundary and 

Water Commission, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at El Paso December 17, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Boundary Waters 

 Minute No. 318 of the International Boundary and 

 Water Commission, United States and Mexico. 

 Signed at El Paso December 17, 2010; 

 Entered into force December 20, 2010.