alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8

Ref: 8P-AR Mr. Richard W. Sprott, Director Utah Division ofAir Quality 150 North 1950 West PO Box 144820 Salt Lake City, UT 841 14A820 Dear Mr
. Sprott: 1595 WYNKOOP STREET DENVER, CO 80202-1129 http://www.epa.gov/region08 

## FEB 1 2007

Thank you for the time you spent with us and EPA's Office ofTransportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) on September 18,2006, discussing Utah's February 6, 1996, Diesel Inspection and Maintenance (riM) State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal. We now have a better understanding ofUtah's needs and interests
. On July 8, 1994, we approved Utah's attainment SIP addressing PM 1

### ofor Salt Lake and Utah Counties. In this approval, we approved Utah's diesel 

### liM program as a SIP strengthening measure, but did not assign any emission reduction credit at the time
. Please refer to 59 FR35036 or 57 FR 60149 for a more detailed description in the notice ofproposed rulemaking. 

### At this time, we do not have a technical basis for quantifying the particulate matter benefits ofan opacity liM program. As aresult, we are not able to assign a specific level ofcredit in MOBILE6 to such programs. Nevertheless, it is likely that finding and fixing smoking vehicles results in net PM benefits in the real world. As we discussed on the call, technology is under development that may allowfor accurate measurement ofPMemissions from diesel vehicles in an 1/M setting. Such technology could lead to development ofprecise quantification ofdiesel I/M program benefits
. Our recommendation is to resubmit, for EPA approval, an updated diescll/M program SIP at a later date, when the evaluation can be quantified with this new technology, and to send us a letter withdrawing the Febn1ary 6, 1996 version 

### ofthe diesel 

### JIM SIP.

### I appreciate your commitment to clean air through the implementation ofthe Diesel 1 /M program. Ifyou have any questions or conccms, please contact Kerri Fiedler ofmy 

### staffat: (303) 312-6493.

cc: Lee Cook, OTAQ C nthia

# Cody~rector Air and Radiation Program

2 

# ,
#### Anselmo Schloss, *Appellant, v.*James N. Plump, *Respondent.*Joseph Rosenthal, *Appellant, v.*The Same.

— Judgments reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1365
JONATHAN BOONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:05-cv-01914-DCN) Submitted: October 4, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Pamela M. Wood, Assistant Regional Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jonathan Boone appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Boone’s complaint requesting review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision that he was not disabled for failure to prosecute. A plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or to comply with the federal procedural rules or an order of the court may warrant involuntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This court reviews a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Ballard v. Carlson , 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| Signature                 |   | Title                                                                                 |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/ Daniel Rooney         |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of                               |
| Daniel      Rooney        |   | the      Board of Directors and Director  (principalexecutive      officer) |
|                      |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie     |   | Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer                                       |
| Gerald      S. Blaskie    |   | (principal      financial officer and principal accountingofficer)                    |
|                      |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/ Robert H. Peitz       |   | Director                                                                              |
| Robert      H. Peitz      |   |                                                                                  |
|                      |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/ Walter J. Doyle       |   | Director                                                                              |
| Walter      J. Doyle      |   |                                                                                  |
|                      |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr.  |   | Director                                                                              |
| Robert      J. Baker, Jr. |   |                                                                                  |
|                      |   |                                                                                  |
| /s/ Edward W. Ungar       |   | Director                                                                              |
| Edward      W. Ungar      |   |                                                                                  |

----
#### § 1220.1 Records required to be retained.

Companies subject to this part shall retain records for the minimum retention periods required by § 1220.6, Schedule of records and periods of retention. After the required retention periods, the records may be destroyed at the discretion of each company's management. It shall be the obligation of the subject company to maintain records that adequately support financial and operational data required by the Board. The company may request a ruling from the Board on the retention of any record. The provisions of this part shall not be construed as excusing compliance with the lawful requirements of any other governmental body prescribing longer retention periods for any category of records.
----

----

| CLECO                POWER LLC |  EXHIBIT                  32.4 |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------|

|   Cleco                  Power LLC                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION                  PURSUANT TO                                      |
| 18                  U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                        |
| AS                  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                         |
| SECTION                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                  2002 |

| (1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| Date:  February                  27, 2008                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Kathleen                  F. Nolen                                                                                                               |
| Kathleen                  F. Nolen                       Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and                  Treasurer |

----

----
-----Original Message----- 

From: paulfetler@earthlink.net [mailto:paulfetler@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Fetler 

1036 N. Edinburgh ave #4 

Los Angeles, CA 90046
#### § 1104.8 Objectionable matter.

The Board may order that any redundant, irrelevant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter be stricken from any document.

[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting, which is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, August 8, 2007, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Doug Gochnour, Designated Federal Officer, at 208-392-6681 or e-mail                         *dgochnour@fs.fed.us*.                    

Dated: July 17, 2007.

Richard A. Smith,

Forest Supervisor, Boise National Forest.

[FR Doc. 07-3617 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE:  3410-11-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Drive Financial Services LP:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Numbers
333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and 33-09485) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of
FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated February 15, 2003, except
as to notes 6 and 11, which are as of February 28, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Drive Financial Services LP and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2002 and the periods March 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001 and August 1, 2000
through February 28, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual
report on Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation. Our report refers to a
change in the method of accounting for residual interests in securitized
financial assets in 2001.


KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 15, 2003
-----Original Message----- 

From: gmaximogomez@gmail.com [mailto:gmaximogomez@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Glenn Maximo-Gomez 

857 N. Rockwell St. 

Chicago, IL 60622
§ 176.170 Transport of Class 1 (explosive) materials in freight containers. ( a ) When Class 1 (explosive) materials are stowed in a freight container, the freight container, for the purposes of this subpart, may be regarded as a closed transport unit for class 1 or a magazine but not a separate compartment.
( b ) Freight containers loaded with Class 1 (explosive) materials, except for explosives in Division 1.4, must not be stowed in the outermost row of containers.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Class 1 (explosive) materials of different compatibility groups may not be stowed within the same freight container except as allowed in § 176.144 of this subpart.
( e ) On vessels, other than specially fitted container ships, freight containers containing Class 1 (explosive) materials must be stowed only in the lowest tier.
( f ) Freight containers carrying different Class 1 (explosive) materials require no segregation from each other, if the provisions of § 176.144 of this subpart allow the Class 1 (explosive) materials to be carried together in the same compartment. In all other instances, the containers must be “separated from” one another in accordance with § 176.83(f) of this part.
( g ) Freight containers carrying Class 1 (explosive) materials may not be handled on board a vessel with fork lift trucks unless approved by the COTP. This does not preclude the use of front-loading trucks using side-frame lifting equipment.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52696, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66282, Dec. 20, 1991; 68 FR 45041, July 31, 2003; 69 FR 76185, Dec. 20, 2004; 78 FR 1095, Jan. 7, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.123 [Reserved]
#### § 178.318 Specification MC 201; container for detonators and percussion caps.
-----Original Message----- 

From: JACKIBREGER@MAC.COM [mailto:JACKIBREGER@MAC.COM] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jacki Breger 

846 S Broadway #1004 

Los Angeles, CA 90014
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 19, 1995 (97), Para 97.5 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1153]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.97.5  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. HOYER:
  Strike everything from ``Sec. 524'' on page 63 line 22 through 
``term.'' on line 5 page 64.

It was decided in the

Yeas

188

negative

Nays

235
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2105

To restrict the closure of Coast Guard small boat stations, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 1995

Mr. STUDDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To restrict the closure of Coast Guard small boat stations,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON CLOSURE OF SMALL BOAT

4 STATIONS.

5 (a) CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Transpor6 tation shall not close, consolidate, or reduce to seasonal

7 status any Coast Guard multi-mission small boat station

8 unless the Secretary has certified that such action will not

9 result in degradation of services that would cause signifi10 cant increased threat to life, property, environment, public
2

•HR 2105 IH

1 safety, or national security. The certification shall in2 clude—

3 (1) a description of regional or local weather

4 and marine conditions that could affect the need for

5 Coast Guard services including water temperature,

6 prevailing weather conditions, and unusual tide and

7 current conditions;

8 (2) an evaluation of the level and type of water9 borne activities, including activities involving rec10 reational boaters, commercial vessels, and commer11 cial fishermen, which was considered in reaching the

12 conclusion that such action will not result in deg13 radation of services that would cause a significant

14 increased threat to life, property, environment, pub15 lic safety, or national security;

16 (3) a detailed comparison of the services pro17 vided within the service area and the services to be

18 provided after such action, including but not limited

19 to services related to search and rescue, recreational

20 boating safety, enforcement of laws and treaties, ma21 rine environmental safety, port safety and security,

22 aids to navigation, and military readiness; and

23 (4) a transition plan, developed in consultation

24 with State and local officials and members of the

25 public for the areas affected by the closure to ensure
3

•HR 2105 IH

1 that the Coast Guard service needs of the area con2 tinue to be met.

3 (b) PUBLIC REVIEW.—Each certification decision

4 shall be preceded by—

5 (1) publication in the Federal Register of a pro6 posed certification; and

7 (2) a 60-day period after such publication dur8 ing which the public may provide comments to the

9 Secretary on the proposed certification.

10 (c) FINAL DECISION.—If after consideration of the

11 public comment received under subsection (b) the Sec12 retary decides to close, consolidate, or reduce to seasonal

13 status any such small-boat station, the Secretary shall

14 publish a final certification in the Federal Register and

15 submit the certification to the Committee on Commerce,

16 Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Com17 mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House

18 of Representatives.

Æ
-----Original Message----- 

From: sophietrauberman@gmail.com [mailto:sophietrauberman@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 11:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sophie Trauberman 

9115 Olin St. 

Los Angeles, CA 90034
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 12

- 00677

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF K .K.M. From the 224th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 08818 Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 6, 2013
DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The underlying lawsuit is a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. Appellant seeks to appeal from temporary orders and an order on a motion for alternative service. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Texas Family Cod e expressly precludes a n interlocutory appeal from a trial court ’ s temporary orders

. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 105.001(e) (West 2008) . There is no statutory authority for an appeal from a family law order providing for alternative service. See CMH
Homes v. Perez , 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (holding, a bsent statute authorizing interlocutory appeal, appellate courts generally have jurisdiction only over final judgments )

. Therefore, on January 10, 2013, this court ordered appellant to show cause in wr iting why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.04

- 12

- 00677

- CV

- 2

- On January 24, 2013, appellant filed a response that did not address our jurisdiction over the three orders her notice of appeal stated she wished to appeal. Instead, appellant’s resp onse alleged: (1) an order denying “the motion to vacate by the Honorable Justice Martha Tanner” was final and appealable; (2) the order denying a “second motion to vacate by the Honorable Judge Sol Casseb” was final and appealable; and ( 3) “the order gran ting sanctions by the Honorable Judge Rene McElhaney” was final and appealable. In the alternative, appellant asked that she be allowed to amend her pleadings “to constitute a Writ of Mandamus.” We granted appellant’s request, and o n February 15, 2013 , a ppellant filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this court in ca u se number 04

- 13

- 00 123

- CV.
Because t he challenged orders are not appealable and because appellant has since filed a petition for writ of mandamus, we grant appellee’s motion to dismiss a nd dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM