alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, April 3, 1995 (54), Para 54.10 American Citizens in Iraq]
[Pages 524-525]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.54.10  american citizens in iraq

  Mr. GILMAN moved to suspend the rules and agree to the following 
resolution (H. Res. 120); as amended:

       Whereas on Saturday, March 25, 1995, an Iraqi court 
     sentenced 2 Americans, William Barloon and David Daliberti, 
     to 8 years imprisonment for allegedly entering Iraq without 
     permission;
       Whereas the 2 men were tried, convicted, and sentenced in 
     what was reported to be a very brief period during that day 
     with no other Americans present and with their only legal 
     counsel having been appointed by the Government of Iraq;
       Whereas the Department of State has stated that the 2 
     Americans have committed no offense justifying imprisonment 
     and has demanded that they be released immediately; and
       Whereas this harsh sentence is unjustified and further 
     distances Iraq from the international community: Now, 
     therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
       (1) strongly condemns the unjustified actions taken by the 
     Government of Iraq against American citizens William Barloon 
     and David Daliberti and demands their immediate release from 
     prison and safe exit from Iraq; and
       (2) urges the President to take all appropriate action to 
     assure their prompt release and safe exit from Iraq. 

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, recognized Mr. 
GILMAN and Mr. HAMILTON, each for 20 minutes.

[[Page 525]]

  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and agree to said resolution, as 
amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, announced that two-
thirds of the Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. STEARNS demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, 
which demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the 
yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, pursuant to clause 
5, rule I, announced that further proceedings on the motion were 
postponed.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L.
Pittman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 29, 2004                  /s/ Gary L. Pittman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Gary L. Pittman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3/A (No. 333-116286) and Form S-8 (333-111984) of Central
Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation of our report dated February 10, 2006 relating
to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 10, 2006
relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Buffalo, New York
February 10, 2006
Draft Proposal CB-30 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Low Pressure Duct Systems (CB-30) 

Objective:  Clarify that continuously welded and locked construction methods for duct systems meets

the code.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.7.1.1 as follows and delete the exception:

C403.2.7.1.1 Low-pressure duct systems. All longitudinal and transverse joints, seams and connections 

of supply and return ducts operating at a static pressure less than or equal to 2 inches water gauge shall 

be securely fastened and sealed with welds, gaskets, mastics (adhesives), mastic-plus-embedded-fabric 

systems or tapes installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s installation instructions, or be 

continuously welded and locking. Pressure classifications specific to the duct system shall be clearly 

indicated on the construction documents in accordance with the International Mechanical Code. 

Reason:  Simplification.  The code currently provides a number of alternative ways to seal ducts.  After

providing a list of acceptable materials, it does not seem appropriate to then provide an exception of

alternative materials and methods are used.  As currently stated in the code and presented in this

change, the same end point is reached.  For that reason it seems simpler to revise the code as noted.   

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
§ 1310.5 Availability of tariffs at carrier offices. ( a ) Each carrier shall maintain, at its principal office, a complete set of its effective tariffs and those to which it is a party.
( b ) Each carrier shall also maintain some or all of its tariffs at its other business offices, upon request. Carriers shall provide information regarding all locations where tariffs may be viewed.
( c ) At all points where tariffs are maintained, they shall be made available for inspection by any person during the carrier's normal business hours. The tariffs shall be accessible and readable. The carrier shall also display, in a conspicuous place in those locations, a notice, in large print, which contains a statement that the tariffs are available for public inspection.
( d ) At all other carrier business offices, the carrier shall display a notice advising the public of the location of the nearest available tariff. The notice shall be in large print and posted in a conspicuous place. In addition, the carrier shall, upon request, make its tariffs available at that location as soon as possible but not later than within 20 days, or provide the sought information orally if satisfactory to the requestor.
( e ) Any publication referred to in a tariff must be maintained with that tariff.
( f ) If any tariff maintained pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section has not been used for a substantial length of time, the availability of that tariff, including its reissues, may be discontinued at that office until such time as it is again requested. It shall then be made available within 20 days.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2080

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide priority health care by

the Department of Veterans Affairs for veterans who received nasopharyngeal irradiation treatments while serving in the Armed Forces.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1995

Mr. GEJDENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide priority

health care by the Department of Veterans Affairs for

veterans who received nasopharyngeal irradiation treatments while serving in the Armed Forces.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRIORITY HEALTH CARE FOR VETERANS WHO

4 RECEIVED NASOPHARYNGEAL IRRADIATION

5 TREATMENTS WHILE SERVING IN THE

6 ARMED FORCES.

7 (a) INPATIENT CARE.—Section 1710 of title 38,

8 United States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 2080 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1)(G), by inserting ‘‘or

2 who received nasopharyngeal irradiation treat3 ments,’’ after ‘‘environmental hazard,’’;

4 (2) in subsection (e)—

5 (A) by adding at the end of paragraph (1)

6 the following new subparagraph:

7 ‘‘(D) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3) of this

8 subsection, a veteran who the Secretary finds was

9 given nasopharyngeal irradiation treatments while

10 serving in the active military, naval, or air service is

11 eligible for hospital care and nursing home care

12 under subsection (a)(1)(G) for any disability, not13 withstanding that there is insufficient medical evi14 dence to conclude that such disability may be associ15 ated with such exposure.’’; and

16 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking out the

17 period at the end and inserting in lieu thereof

18 ‘‘, or in the case of care for a veteran described

19 in paragraph (1)(D), after December 31,

20 1998.’’.

21 (b) OUTPATIENT CARE.—Section 1712(a)(1) of such

22 title is amended—

23 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub24 paragraph (C);
3

•HR 2080 IH

1 (2) by striking out the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (D) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

3 and

4 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(E) during the period before Janaury 1, 1999,

7 for any disability in the case of a veteran who the

8 Secretary finds was given nasopharyngeal irradiation

9 treatments while serving in the active military,

10 naval, or air service, notwithstanding that there is

11 insufficient medical evidence to conclude that such

12 disability may be associated with such exposure.

13 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1712(a)(7)

14 of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘or (1)(E)’’ after

15 ‘‘paragraph (1)(D)’’.

Æ
1100

1000

1300

1100

1300

1200

1100

1200

1200

1200

1200

1100

ARIZONA

PIMA CO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

O'Neill

Hills

Agua Dulce

Mountains

Quitoba quito

Springs

West of

Quitoba quito

Springs

Pozo

Nuevo

Well

3533

30

35

35

35

31

32

34

35

35

35

37

35

35

35

40

3536

39

35

35

32

35

35

35

42

35

29

30

41

000m

31

N

35

35

3534

35

33

35

36

35

37

35

39

3538

35

29

2

3542

35

35

90

41

000m

89

N

40

2 2 291 292 293 294 296 297

289 291

E

2 95

2

93 2

88

2 94

98

2

000m

90 92 2

000 FEET

2 000mE 2

290

88 96 297 320000 FEET

FEET

FEET

57' 57'30"

55'

360

12'30"

55'

000

30"

10'

00'

30"

30"

00'

113°15'

113°07'

113°

113°15'

32° 32°

07'

31°52'30" 31°52'30"

330000

12'30"

299 10'

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ARIZONA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

WEST OF QUITOBAQUITO SPRINGS, AZ-SON

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

WEST OF QUITOBAQUITO SPRINGS QUADRANGLE

ARIZONA-SONORA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2007

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2003

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Arizona Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

TA

12R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 9 ́

21 MILS

11° 4 ́

197 MILS
#### Ralston Business Men’s Association et al., appellees, v. Benjamin F. Bush, Receiver, appellant.

Filed May 4, 1918.

No. 20040.

Carriers: Expenditures: Government Control. The federal government being in control of the railroads of the country as a war measure, state courts and administrative tribunals should consider the general welfare in adjusting between private suitors controversies involving the expenditure of railroad funds for the improvement of local transportation facilities.

Appeal from the State Railway Commission.

*Reversed.*

*447
      *J. A. G. Kennedy*and *Philip E. Horan,*for appellant.

*James H. Adams, contra.*

Bose, J.

Tire Nebraska State Eailway Commission ordered defendant to provide at the village of Ealston a station and other shipping facilities near the intersection of Seventy-seventh street and the Missouri Pacific Eailway track. The case is presented here upon an appeal by defendant.

Three-fourths of a mile from the industrial part of Ealston defendant has a building and a team track. The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Eailroad Company has a station at .the village itself, where three employees are engaged in the railway service. The sufficiency of existing shipping facilities and the necessity for improvements were controverted issues.

On appeal the decision of the Nebraska State Eailway Commission is challenged as unreasonable. The order was made before the United States engaged in the present war. As a military measure, the federal government is now controlling defendant’s railway system. The enforcement of the order challenged on appeal will require labor, materials, and money. Owing to the exigencies of war, the government is making extraordinary demands for funds, men, materials, and railroad equipment. Defendant’s lines of railroad transportation are connecting links between a granary of the nation and millions of men now engaged in the common defense. In this emergency the general walfare should be considered in adjusting between private suitors controversies involving expenditures for the improvement of local railroad facilities. When the order was made there was no occasion or opportunity to present or consider these features of the questions presented by the appeal. The new situation grew out of facts requiring the judicial notice of the appellate court. The Nebraska State Eailway Commission should have an opportunity for further inquiry in view of changed con*448ditions. To that end, following *Marshall v. Bush, ante,*p. 279, the order challenged by defendant is vacated and the proceeding remanded to the Nebraska State State Railway Commission for further consideration.

Reversed.

Letton, J., not sitting.
From: tedpa@comcast.net [mailto:tedpa@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ted Padgett 

402 SE 234th Ave 

Vancouver, WA 98684
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2711 Personnel health.

Each operator shall follow a written plan to verify that personnel assigned operating, maintenance, security, or fire protection duties at the LNG plant do not have any physical condition that would impair performance of their assigned duties. The plan must be designed to detect both readily observable disorders, such as physical handicaps or injury, and conditions requiring professional examination for discovery.
# EUR-Lex - 52003XG0117(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XG0117(01)

**Council Conclusions of 2 December 2002 on obestiy **

*
Official Journal C 011 , 17/01/2003 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Council Conclusions

of 2 December 2002

on obestiy

(2003/C 11/02)

THE COUNCIL

- EMPHASISES its great concern about the serious health, social and economic impact of the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in individuals, particularly children, and in the European Community,

- REFERS to scientific results showing that obesity is the major cause of a range of serious associated diseases, and indicating that 15 % of children and adolescents in Europe are suffering from obesity, and that this number will increase dramatically in many Member States unless appropriate action is taken,

- REAFFIRMS the Council Resolution of 3 December 1990 regarding the action programme on nutrition and health(1), the Conclusions of the Council and the Ministers for Health of the Member States meeting within the Council of 15 May 1992(2) on nutrition and health, and the Council Resolution on health and nutrition of 14 December 2000(3),

- REFERS to the focus, which the EU Conference on Obestiy in Copenhagen on 11 to 12 September 2002 put on the multiple problems caused by obesity, and the urgent request from leading international experts to act as quickly as possible on the basis of the existing documentation, simultaneously with the gathering of new knowledge,

- UNDERLINES the need, in preventing and responding to the problems resulting from obesity, to take a cross-sectoral approach, including, inter alia, the health, social, food educational, cultural and transport sectors.

INVITES THE MEMBER STATES to take account in their national public health policies of the need to address the issue of obesity.

INVITES THE COMMISSION TO:

1. reinforce its efforts to prevent and combat obesity and, in particular, its response to the invitations of the Council in its Resolution of 14 December 2000;

2. support the Member States in their efforts to prevent and manage obesity, taking into account the potential risk of eating disorders, particularly by developing innovative measures and approaches concerning nutrition and physical activity;

3. continue to strenghten the research on obesity;

4. ensure that prevention of obesity is taken into account in all relevant Community policies, and, in particular, in the framework of the programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003 to 2008).

(1) OJ C 329, 31.12.1990, p. 1.

(2) OJ C 148, 12.6.1992, p. 2.

(3) OJ C 20, 23.1.2001, p. 1.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S32481

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Zachary P. ZYWUSKO Staff Sergeant (E

- 5 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 26 September 2018

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: J. Wesley Moore

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months , and reduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 23 June 2017 by SpCM convened at Joint Base Andrews , Maryland

. For Appellant: Major Patrick A. Clary , USAF. For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler , USAF ; Mary Ellen Payne , Esquire

. Before JOHNSON , DENNIS , and LEW IS , Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________

PE R CURIAM :United States v. Zywusko , No. ACM S32481

2 The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. * Arti cles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sent ence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court

* The staff judge advocate’s recommendation to the convening authority erroneously stated the maximum imposable punishment included, inter alia , forfeiture of two

thirds of Appellant’s pay per month for 12 months and a fine. See Rules for Courts

Martial 201 (f)(2)(B)(i), 1003(b)(3); United States v. Books , No. ACM S32369, 2017 CCA LEXIS 226 , at *7 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 31 Mar. 2017) (unpub. op.). Appellant has not asserted and we do not find any colorable showing of possible prejudice from the error under the facts of this case. See United States v. Kho , 54 M.J. 63, 65 (C.A.A.F. 2000)

.
<PAGE>
                               EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>

                        BIOPOOL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<CAPTION>

                              1995            1994             1993   
                          ___________     ___________      ___________


<S>                       <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income for the year   $   140,817     $   705,331     $    360,729

Weighted avg. number 
   of shares outstanding    7,907,494       7,880,033        7,352,554

Net income per share      $      0.02     $      0.09     $       0.05

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.485 Remedial measures: Transmission lines. ( a ) *General corrosion.* Each segment of transmission line with general corrosion and with a remaining wall thickness less than that required for the MAOP of the pipeline must be replaced or the operating pressure reduced commensurate with the strength of the pipe based on actual remaining wall thickness. However, corroded pipe may be repaired by a method that reliable engineering tests and analyses show can permanently restore the serviceability of the pipe. Corrosion pitting so closely grouped as to affect the overall strength of the pipe is considered general corrosion for the purpose of this paragraph.
( b ) *Localized corrosion pitting.* Each segment of transmission line pipe with localized corrosion pitting to a degree where leakage might result must be replaced or repaired, or the operating pressure must be reduced commensurate with the strength of the pipe, based on the actual remaining wall thickness in the pits.
( c ) *Calculating remaining strength.* Under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the strength of pipe based on actual remaining wall thickness must be determined and documented in accordance with § 192.712.
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12302, June 30, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39390, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28785, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69664, Dec. 14, 1999; Amdt. 192-119, 80 FR 181, Jan. 5, 2015; Amdt. 192-132, 87 FR 52270, Aug. 24, 2022]