alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald S. BlaskieVice President and Chief Financial Officer ofSCI Engineered Materials, Inc.February 28, 2011
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 14, 1995 (79), Para 79.24 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 914]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.79.24  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. GUTKNECHT, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule on Thursday, June 15, 1995: the Committee on 
Agriculture, the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, the 
Committee on Commerce, the Committee on Economic and Educational 
Opportunities, the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, the 
Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Resources, the Committee on 
Science, the Committee on Small Business, the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 
and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
```
#### § 30.10-9 Classification requirements—TB/ALL.

The term *classification requirements* means applicable rules and supplementary requirements of the American Bureau of Shipping, or other recognized classification society.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.466 Additional tests for Type A packagings designed for liquids and gases. ( a ) In addition to the tests prescribed in § 173.465, Type A packagings designed for liquids and gases must be capable of withstanding the following tests in this section. The tests are successful if the requirements of § 173.412(k) are met. ( 1 ) *Free drop test.* The packaging specimen must drop onto the target so as to suffer the maximum damage to its containment. The height of the drop measured from the lowest part of the packaging specimen to the upper surface of the target must be 9 m (30 feet) or greater. The target must be as specified in § 173.465(c)(5).
( 2 ) *Penetration test.* The specimen must be subjected to the test specified in § 173.465(e) except that the height of the drop must be 1.7 m (5.5 feet).
( b ) [Reserved]
[Amdt. 173-244, 60 FR 50307, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 66 FR 45380, Aug. 28, 2001; 79 FR 40617, July 11, 2014; 80 FR 1163, Jan. 8, 2015]
§ 10.15 Protection of records. ( a ) No person may, without permission, remove any record made available for inspection or copying under this part from the place where it is made available. In addition, no person may steal, alter, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy, in whole or in part, such a record.
( b ) Section 641 of title 18 of the United States Code provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Whoever * * * steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record * * * or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof * * * shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 10 years or both; but if the value of such property does not exceed the sum of $100, he shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year or both * * *.
( c ) Section 2071 of title 18 of the United States Code provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited * * * in any public office, or with any * * * public officer of the United States, shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of LKA Gold Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Nanette Abraham, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  April 15, 2014







_________________________________________


Nanette Abraham


Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Patrick J. Moty, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the“registrant”);2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and;5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ PATRICK J. MOTYPatrick J. Moty
----

----

| CLECO      CORPORATION | EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|------------------------|-------------------|

|   Cleco      Corporation                |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO                    |
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

| (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:  February      25, 2010                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     /s/  Michael      H. Madison   |
| Michael      H. MadisonPresident      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----

----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 1995

104th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 104–66

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF

APPELLATE PROCEDURE

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE THAT HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE COURT, PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. 2072

MAY 2, 1995.—Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and ordered

to be printed

(iii)
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
§ 1546.301 Bomb or air piracy threats. No foreign air carrier may land or take off an airplane in the United States after receiving a bomb or air piracy threat against that airplane, unless the following actions are taken: ( a ) If the airplane is on the ground when a bomb threat is received and the next scheduled flight of the threatened airplane is to or from a place in the United States, the foreign air carrier ensures that the pilot in command is advised to submit the airplane immediately for a security inspection and an inspection of the airplane is conducted before the next flight.
( b ) If the airplane is in flight to a place in the United States when a bomb threat is received, the foreign air carrier ensures that the pilot in command is advised immediately to take the emergency action necessary under the circumstances and a security inspection of the airplane is conducted immediately after the next landing.
( c ) If information is received of a bomb or air piracy threat against an airplane engaged in an operation specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the foreign air carrier ensures that notification of the threat is given to the appropriate authorities of the State in whose territory the airplane is located or, if in flight, the appropriate authorities of the State in whose territory the airplane is to land.
[67 FR 8377, Feb. 22, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 30513, May 26, 2006]
**Exhibit 8**

----

 

| **List      of Subsidiaries**                 |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   |
| Name                                          | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation or Organisation |
| British Transco Capital      Inc              | Delaware |
| British Transco Finance      Inc              | Delaware |
| British Transco Finance      (No1) Ltd        | Cayman Islands |
| British Transco Finance      (No 2) Ltd       | Cayman Islands |
| British Transco Finance      (No 3) Ltd       | England & Wales |
| British Transco Finance      (No 5) Ltd       | England & Wales |
| British Transco International      Finance BV | The Netherlands |
| Joint Radio Company Ltd      (50%)            | England & Wales |
| Lattice OPSCO Ltd                             | England & Wales |
| Transco (Employers) Ltd                       | England & Wales |
| Transco Metering Services      Ltd            | England & Wales |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 190

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 190 appear at 78 FR 58908, Sept. 25, 2013.

#### § 190.325 Additional rulemaking proceedings.

The Administrator may initiate any further rulemaking proceedings that the Administrator finds necessary or desirable. For example, interested persons may be invited to make oral arguments, to participate in conferences between the Administrator or the Administrator's representative and interested persons, at which minutes of the conference are kept, to appear at informal hearings presided over by officials designated by the Administrator at which a transcript of minutes are kept, or participate in any other proceeding to assure informed administrative action and to protect the public interest.
#### § 56.70-3 Limitations.

Backing strips used at longitudinal welded joints must be removed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMON BRIGHTMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (2:03-cr-00627-SB-2; 2:15-cv-00532-SB)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Brightman, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan S. Williams, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Brightman seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying it on that basis. As we 

recently held, a certificate of appealability is not required in 

order for us to address the district court’s jurisdictional 

categorization of a “Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized 

successive habeas petition.” United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 

392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015). Our review of the record confirms 

that Brightman sought successive § 2255 relief, without 

authorization from this court, and we therefore hold that the 

district court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to 

consider the subject motion. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 

2255(h) (2012). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order. 

Additionally, we construe Brightman’s notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 

(4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on 

either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be 

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have 

found the movant guilty of the offense; or
3

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made 

retroactive to cases on collateral review by the 

Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Brightman’s claims do not satisfy either 

of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS
I, John Venette, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Implant Technologies,
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



(Date)                              April 26, 2007


BY(Signature)                       /s/ John Venette
(Name and Title)                    John Venette
                                    Treasurer, Secretary and Chief
                                    Financial Officer
§ 178.345-13 Pressure and leakage tests. ( a ) Each cargo tank must be pressure and leakage tested in accordance with this section and §§ 178.346-5, 178.347-5, or 178.348-5.
( b ) *Pressure test.* Each cargo tank or cargo tank compartment must be tested hydrostatically or pneumatically. Each cargo tank of a multi-cargo tank motor vehicle must be tested with the adjacent cargo tanks empty and at atmospheric pressure. Each closure, except pressure relief devices and loading/unloading venting devices rated at less than the prescribed test pressure, must be in place during the test. If the venting device is not removed during the test, such device must be rendered inoperative by a clamp, plug or other equally effective restraining device, which may not prevent the detection of leaks, or damage the device. Restraining devices must be removed immediately after the test is completed. ( 1 ) *Hydrostatic method.* Each cargo tank, including its domes, must be filled with water or other liquid having similar viscosity, the temperature of which may not exceed 100 °F. The cargo tank must then be pressurized as prescribed in the applicable specification. The pressure must be gauged at the top of the cargo tank. The prescribed test pressure must be maintained for at least 10 minutes during which time the cargo tank must be inspected for leakage, bulging, or other defect.
( 2 ) *Pneumatic method.* A pneumatic test may be used in place of the hydrostatic test. However, pneumatic pressure testing may involve higher risk than hydrostatic testing. Therefore, suitable safeguards must be provided to protect personnel and facilities should failure occur during the test. The cargo tank must be pressurized with air or an inert gas. Test pressure must be reached gradually by increasing the pressure to one half of test pressure. Thereafter, the pressure must be increased in steps of approximately one tenth of the test pressure until test pressure is reached. Test pressure must be held for at least 5 minutes. The pressure must then be reduced to the inspection pressure which must be maintained while the entire cargo tank surface is inspected for leakage and other sign of defects. The inspection method must consist of coating all joints and fittings with a solution of soap and water or other equally sensitive method.
( c ) *Leakage test.* The cargo tank with all its accessories in place and operable must be leak tested at not less than 80 percent of tank's MAWP with the pressure maintained for at least 5 minutes.
( d ) Any cargo tank that leaks, bulges or shows any other sign of defect must be rejected. Rejected cargo tanks must be suitably repaired and retested successfully prior to being returned to service. The retest after any repair must use the same method of test under which the cargo tank was originally rejected.
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25026, June 12, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37063, Sept. 7, 1990; Amdt. 178-105, 59 FR 55176, Nov. 3, 1994; Amdt. 178-118, 61 FR 51342, Oct. 1, 1996; 65 FR 58631, Sept. 29, 2000; 68 FR 19284, Apr. 18, 2003]
From: timmartinsr@gmail.com [mailto:timmartinsr@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Timothy Martin 

485 Mountain Home Rd. 

Woodside, CA 94062