alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.4


 


WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN
INTERNATIONAL, INC.


8211 Town Center
Drive


Baltimore,
Maryland 21236


 


Securities and Exchange Commission

Station Place

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549


 


March 16, 2006


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Instruments defining the rights of holders of certain
issues of long-term debt of Williams Scotsman International, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries have not been filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K
because the authorized principal amount of any one of such issues does not exceed
10% of the total assets of Williams Scotsman International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Williams Scotsman International, Inc.
agrees to furnish a copy of each of such instruments to the Commission upon
request.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/John Ross

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name: John Ross

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President and General Counsel
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 4, 2014

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50339

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IGNACIO RUELAS TORRES, also known as Nacho,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-289-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Ignacio Ruelas Torres (Torres),

federal prisoner # 97142-180, pleaded guilty to accepting bribes and conspiring

to defraud the United States and was sentenced to concurrent sentences of 60

and 84 months. Torres did not appeal, but he filed an unsuccessful 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Torres, No. 09-50762 (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 2010)

(unpublished order denying a certificate of appealability). 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 20, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50339 Document: 00511732225 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2012
No. 11-50339

Torres now appeals the denial of two motions he filed in the district court

in 2011. The first was a “Motion under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4),” and the second

was a similar “Motion Pursuant to 18 USC 3742(a) & (c).” In both motions, he

ignored his concurrent sentences and argued that the total sentence imposed

was 144 months rather than 84. He also contends that he did not agree to the

concurrent 60-month sentence or to any term of supervised release. The district

court denied the motions and alternatively dismissed them after finding that

neither could be construed in any manner as a suitable vehicle for seeking relief. 

Torres also moves for appointment of counsel and for leave to appeal in forma

pauperis (IFP). 

The motion to proceed IFP is construed as a challenge to the district

court’s certification that an appeal would be frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor,

117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). We ask only whether the appeal presents any

issue that is not frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.

1983). We may dismiss a frivolous appeal. Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2. 

Torres’s motions attacking his conviction and sentence were unauthorized

and without any jurisdictional basis under § 3742, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60, or any other federal rule or statute. See United

States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994). Consequently, Torres

cannot identify any nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. 

Accordingly, the motion to appeal IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The motion

to appoint counsel is also DENIED.

2

Case: 11-50339 Document: 00511732225 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2012
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.334 Organic phosphates mixed with compressed gas. Hexaethyl tetraphosphate, parathion, tetraethyl dithio pyrophosphate, tetraethyl pyrophosphate, or other Division 6.1 organic phosphates (including a compound or mixture), may be mixed with a non-flammable compressed gas. This mixture may not contain more than 20 percent by weight of organic phosphate and must be packaged in DOT 3A240, 3AA240, 3B240, 4B240, 4BA240, 4BW240 or UN cylinders meeting all of the following requirements: ( a ) Each cylinder may be filled with not more than 5 kg (11.0 lb) of the mixture, to a maximum filling density of not more than 80 percent of the water capacity.
( b ) No cylinder may be equipped with an eduction tube or a fusible plug.
( c ) No cylinder may be equipped with any valve unless the valve is a type approved by the Associate Administrator.
( d ) Cylinders must be overpacked in a box, crate, or other strong outer packaging conforming to the requirements of § 173.25 and arranged to protect each valve or other closing device from damage. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, no more than four cylinders may be packed in a strong outer packaging. Each strong outer packaging with its closing device protection must be sufficiently strong to protect all parts of each cylinder from deformation or leakage if the completed package is dropped 1.8 m (6 feet) onto a non-yielding surface, such as concrete or steel, impacting at the packaging's weakest point.
( e ) Cylinders may be packed in strong wooden boxes with valves or other closing devices protected from damage, with not more than twelve cylinders in one outside wooden box. An outer fiberboard box may be used when not more than four such cylinders are to be shipped in one packaging. Valves must be adequately protected. Box and valve protection must be of sufficient strength to protect all parts of inner packagings and valves from deformation or breakage resulting from a drop of at least 1.8 m (6 feet) onto a non-yielding surface, such as concrete or steel, impacting at the weakest point.
[67 FR 51651, Aug. 8, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 54395, Sept. 14, 2006; 75 FR 5395, Feb. 2, 2010; 80 FR 72928, Nov. 23, 2015]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10365 Conference Calendar

SWINETTA BENTRELL MARSH, By her next friend Stella Marsh Locke Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Et Al. , Defendants DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-2255-R

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Swinetta Bentrell Marsh appeals the granting of defendant Dallas Independent School District’s (“DISD”) motion for summary judgment on Marsh’s sexual harassment claims under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688. The district court granted summary judgment for defendant DISD because it concluded that Marsh had failed to allege factsNo. 97-10365 -2- sufficient to impose liability on defendant DISD under Title IX. The district court based its ruling on this court’s recent decisions in Canutillo Independent School District v. Leija , 101 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S.Ct. 2434 (1997), Rosa H. v. San Elizario Independent School District , 106 F.3d 648 (5th Cir. 1997), and Doe v. Lago Vista Independent School District , 106 F.3d 1223 (5th Cir. 1997), petition for cert. filed , 65 USLW 3799 (U.S. May 23, 1997)(No. 96-1866). Marsh argues that the relied-upon cases are not controlling law in the instant case or, alternatively, should be overruled. Marsh fails to demonstrate, however, that the cases relied upon by the district court are not controlling or to present any argument that they have been misapplied. Furthermore, even if this panel of the court were so inclined, it could not overrule the decision of a prior panel. Such a decision may only be overruled pursuant to en banc consideration or a superseding contrary decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. In re Dyke , 943 F.2d 1435, 1442 (5th Cir. 1991). Marsh’s appeal thus raises no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, Marsh’s appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Sunswick Land Company, Respondent, *v.*Walter E. Murdock, Appellant.

*Sunswick Land Co.*v. *Murdock,*129 App. Div. 579, affirmed.

(Submitted May 19, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 9, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract to purchase real property.

*Herbert 8. Murphy*for appellant.

*Arthur J. Baldwin*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     $937,094
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    $11,332
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        $120,743
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      $180,923
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $1,250,092
<COMMON>                                       $87,480
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     $276,284
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            $90,475
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                $454,239
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $35,000
<PREFERRED>                                    $21,030
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          $389,245
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   $1,577
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      $13,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                $336,001
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               $1,250,092
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     $512,215
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           $29,040
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $412,281
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $441,321
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        $70,894
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             $10,225
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 $81,119
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       $28,397
<NET-INCOME>                                   $52,722
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     $4,903
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  $47,650
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       $36,459
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      $16,862
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        $110,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       $0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32 .1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viropro, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Serge Beausoleil, acting as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Serge Beausoleil

_____________________________________________

Serge Beausoleil, President & CEO

Dated:  November 2, 2009



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Viropro Inc. and will be retained by Viropro Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### William H. Collins, Respondent, *v.*The Victoria Paper Mills Company, Appellant.

*Collins*v. *Victoria Paper Mills Co.,*140 App. Div. 941, appeal dismissed.

(Argued January 9, 1911;

decided January 10, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 23, 1910, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a prior direction dismissing the complaint and granting a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

The motion was made upon the ground that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*James H. Mosher*for motion.

*Jerome L. Cheney*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, April 6, 1995 (57), Para 57.29 Message from the President]
[Page 597]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.57.29  message from the president

  A further message in writing from the President of the United States 
was communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his 
secretaries.
```
§ 179.100-17 Closures for openings. ( a ) Closures shall be of approved design and made of metal not subject to rapid deterioration by the lading. Plugs, if used, shall be solid, with NPT threads, and shall be of a length which will screw at least six threads inside the face of fitting or tank.
( b ) [Reserved]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending May 7, 2011

----

Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend without revision the Application for Membership in the Federal Reserve System (FR 2083-2083C), Application for Adjustment in the Holding of Federal Reserve Bank Stock (FR 2056), Member Banks Converting into or Merging into Nonmember Banks (FR 2086a), De Novo National Banks (FR 2030), Nonmember State Banks Converting into National Banks (FR 2030a), Member Banks in Voluntary Liquidation (FR 2086), Insolvent Member Banks (FR 2087), and Notifications Related to Community Development and Public Welfare Investments of State Member Banks (FR H-6).            -Proposed, May 2, 2011            Enforcement            Calwest Bancorp, Rancho Santa Margarita, California -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.            -Announced, May 3, 2011                        First Financial Service Corporation, Elizabethtown, Kentucky -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.            -Announced, May 3, 2011                        Regent Bancorp, Inc., Davie, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, May 3, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Lakeview Oregon, for the purpose of evaluating and recommending resource management projects for funding in 2008, under the provisions of Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (as extended for 2008). 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on August 20 and 21, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will take place at the Lakeview Interagency Office, 1301 South G Street, Lakeview, OR 97630. 

                        Send written comments to Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee, c/o USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 67, Paisley OR 97636, or electronically to                         *agowan@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Amy Gowan, Designated Federal Official, c/o Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka CA 96097, telephone (530) 841-4421. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The agenda will include a review of the status of a selection of the 2002-2007 projects recommended by the RAC, consideration of Title II project proposals for 2008 submitted by the Forest Service, the public, and other agencies, presentations by project proponents, and final recommendations for funding of fiscal year 2008 projects. 

                    All Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public. There will be a time for                           ( print page 40273)                        public input and comment. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.                 

Dated: July 17, 2007. 

Amy Gowan, 

Designated Federal Official, Fremont-Winema Resource Advisory Committee. 

[FR Doc. 07-3611 Filed 7-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1826 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 85
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1826

                          [Report No. 104-174]

  To repeal the authorization of transitional appropriations for the 
         United States Postal Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1995

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

                             July 10, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the authorization of transitional appropriations for the 
         United States Postal Service, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--(1) Section 2004 of title 39, United States Code, 
is repealed.
    (2)(A) The table of sections for chapter 20 of such title is 
amended by repealing the item relating to section 2004.
    (B) Section 2003(e)(2) of such title is amended by striking 
``sections 2401 and 2004'' each place it appears and inserting 
``section 2401''.
    (b) Clarification That Liabilities Formerly Paid Pursuant to 
Section 2004 Remain Liabilities Payable by the Postal Service.--Section 
2003 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(h) Liabilities of the former Post Office Department to the 
Employees' Compensation Fund (appropriations for which were authorized 
by former section 2004, as in effect before the effective date of this 
subsection) shall be liabilities of the Postal Service payable out of 
the Fund.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of enactment of this Act or October 1, 1995, whichever is 
later.
                                     

                                                  Union Calendar No. 85

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1826

                          [Report No. 104-174]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To repeal the authorization of transitional appropriations for the 
         United States Postal Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 10, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```