alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending November 10, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of *

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 (eff. Dec. 1, 2006) and 10th Cir. R.

32.1 (eff. Jan. 1, 2007).

F I LED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 18, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 06-2024

BRIAN NEIL GRACE,

Defendant-Appellant.

(D.C. No. CR-05-148-JCH)

(D. New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

*

Before BRISCOE, McCONNELL, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore,

ordered submitted without oral argument. 

Having entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of bank robbery in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and one count of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

2113(a), (d), Defendant Brian Grace appeals the denial of his motion to suppress an
-2-

incriminating statement, along with all evidence derived therefrom. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 

“‘When reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress, we view the evidence in the

light most favorable to the government, accept the district court’s findings of fact unless

clearly erroneous, and review de novo the ultimate determination of reasonableness under

the Fourth Amendment.’” United States v. Apperson, 441 F.3d 1162, 1184 (10th Cir.

2006) (quoting United States v. Katoa, 379 F.3d 1203, 1205 (10th Cir. 2004)). As he did

before the district court, Grace contends on appeal that Officer Lindell Wright did not

have reasonable articulable suspicion to support the stop. In response, the United States

argues that the interaction between Grace and Wright was a consensual encounter

requiring no level of suspicion. In the alternative, the United States asserts that the

similarity between Grace and his car and the description of the bank robbery suspect and

the suspect’s car provided Wright with reasonable articulable suspicion to stop Grace’s

vehicle.

For the reasons stated by the district court, even if we conclude that Wright had

seized Grace, Wright had reasonable articulable suspicion to detain Grace. As a result,

the district court did not err in denying Grace’s motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1901

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to

delay the implementation of remedial action and design for a particular

Superfund site for one year while undertaking monitoring and testing

to determine whether further action is needed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 1995

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to delay the implementation of remedial

action and design for a particular Superfund site for

one year while undertaking monitoring and testing to

determine whether further action is needed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ONE-YEAR DELAY OF REMEDIAL ACTION AND

4 DESIGN ON CERTAIN SUPERFUND SITE.

5 (a) ONE-YEAR DELAY REQUIRED.—The Adminis6 trator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall delay
2

•HR 1901 IH

1 implementation of any remedial action and design for the

2 Burn Pit Superfund Site (located at New Hanover County

3 Airport, North Carolina) for a period of one year, begin4 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

5 (b) MONITORING AND TESTING REQUIRED.—During

6 the one-year period referred to in subsection (a), the Ad7 ministrator shall monitor and test the Burn Pit Superfund

8 Site (including groundwater) for contamination, including

9 contamination by benzene. At the end of the one-year pe10 riod, the Administrator shall determine whether the level

11 of contamination at the site is acceptable.

12 (c) PROHIBITION ON FURTHER ACTION AND RELIEF

13 FROM LIABILITY.—If the level of contamination is deter14 mined to be acceptable under subsection (b) for the Site—

15 (1) the Administrator may not implement any

16 further remedial action or design for the Site after

17 the one-year period referred to in subsection (a); and

18 (2) the potentially responsible parties for the

19 Site shall have no further liability for the Site under

20 the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com21 pensation, and Liability Act of 1980.

Æ
U.S. Geological   Survey Fact Sheet 069-01  Online version 1.0

**SCIGN—New   Southern California GPS Network Advances  the Study of Earthquakes**

*By*

**Ken   Hudnut and Nancy King**

| **ABSTRACT**

Southern         California is a giant jigsaw puzzle, and scientists are now using GPS         satellites to track the pieces. These puzzle pieces are continuously moving,         slowly straining the faults in between. That strain is then eventually         released in earthquakes. The innovative Southern California Integrated         GPS Network (SCIGN) tracks the motions of these pieces over most of southern         California with unprecedented precision. This new network greatly improves         the ability to assess seismic hazards and quickly measure the larger displacements         that occur during and immediatelyafter earthquakes. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Download the entire   fact sheet as a PDF document (640 KB)

Download a free   copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader

For questions about the   content of this report, contact Ken Hudnut

| Help   | PDF help   | Geopubs main page | Fact   Sheets |

----

URL of this page:   https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2001/fs069-01  Maintained by: Michael Diggles  Created: July 6, 2001  Last modified: May 24, 2005 (mfd)

| Privacy   Statement | Disclaimer   |

| Department   of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey   | Geologic Division | Earthquake   Hazards Program |
Exhibit 31.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Anastasios Kyriakides, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Interlink Global
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date: April 28, 2008


                                      By: Anastasios Kyriakides
                                      Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company") for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven E. Hebert, Vice PresidentFinance and Chief
Financial Officer of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

(1)   The
Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 22, 2005 |  | /s/STEVEN E. HEBERTSteven E. Hebert
Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure
BioSciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Charles Brooks, Respondent, v. The Farmers Creamery Association of Turners, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
#### § 178.338 Specification MC-338; insulated cargo tank motor vehicle.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                1000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                      465
<SECURITIES>                3,308
<RECEIVABLES>               1,640
<ALLOWANCES>                0
<INVENTORY>                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>            5,558
<PP&E>                      27,115
<DEPRECIATION>              10,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              22,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       3,702
<BONDS>                     122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>       0
<PREFERRED>                 0
<COMMON>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                  18,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>22,095
<SALES>                     9,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            9,424
<CGS>                       3,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>               3,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>          78
<INCOME-PRETAX>             6,142
<INCOME-TAX>                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         0
<DISCONTINUED>              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>             0
<CHANGES>                   0
<NET-INCOME>                6,142
<EPS-PRIMARY>               0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>               0.57
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Minority Programs Review Committee, MARC Review Subcommittee A.                    

*Date:*                         February 15, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mona R. Trempe, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3998,                         *trempemo@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2007.

David Clary,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-358  Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
98-980.

#### State v. Campbell.

Franklin C.P. No. 97CR042020. On motion for leave to supplement the record. Motion granted.
UBEScientificAnalysisLaboratoryInc.(Seal)123456789101112131415161718192021
**diesel gasoline** 

Anchorage: $3.79$3.99 Anchorage: $3.56$3.69 Cordova: $4.31 Cordova: $4.08 Ketchikan: $3.34 Ketchikan: $3.34 Kenai $4.12 Kenai: $3.94 Juneau: $3.49$4.31 Juneau $4.12

from K Wu, March 2, 2011 According to http://www.alaskagasprices.com/ reporting within 72 hours.
These are the current diesel fuel costs per gallon by city. There were no prices for the other cities. **gasbuddy.com** Juneau: $3.49 to $4.31 **8-Mar-11** Ketchikan: $3.34 Cordova: $4.31 gasoline Anchorage: $3.79 to$3.99 Kenai 3.98 Cordova 4.08 These are the current gasoline costs per gallon by city: Juneau 3.62 Kkan 3.39 Anchorage: $3.56 to $3.69 Kodiak 4.05 Cordova: $4.08 Ketchikan: $3.34 Kenai:$ 3.94 Petersburg: $3.87 to $3.95

The EIA only breaks down prices by region (West Coast Less CA) dated Feb 28 2011. These are their prices that I imagine are an underestimate. All projections also point to a steady increase over next months.
Diesel: $3.892 Gasoline: $3.623**diesel:gasoline avg ratio** 

1.081301 1.056373 1.045891 1

diesel4.31 4.31 3.90 3.59 4.51

These are their prices that I imagine are an underestimate. All projections also point to a steady increase over next months.**Gasoline Low**  **High Diesel**  **Low High** 

Anchorage: $3.93 $4.20 Anchorage: $4.18$4.42 Cordova: $4.49 Cordova: $4.89 Ketchikan: $3.59$4.20 Ketchikan: $4.20 Kenai $4.32 $4.35 Kenai: $4.53 $4.58 Juneau: $3.94$4.05 Juneau $4.04 4.31 Sitka $4.04 Sitka $4.45 Petersburg na Petersburg na
from K Wu, April 14, 2011 According to http://www.alaskagasprices.com/ reporting within 72 hours.**diesel:gasoline avg ratio** 

0.950226244 0.918200409 0.90773 0.854761905
|    |                                                                                 |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Freeport-McMoRan Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/  Kathleen L. Quirk |
|   | Kathleen L. Quirk |
|   | Executive Vice President, |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1874 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1874

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 1 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To modify the boundaries of the Talladega National Forest, Alabama.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF TALLADEGA NATIONAL FOREST.

    (a) Boundary Modification.--The exterior boundaries of the 
Talladega National Forest is hereby modified to include the following 
described lands:
             Huntsville Meridian, Township 17 South, Range 8 East, 
        Section 34, NE\1/4\, SW\1/4\, and S\1/2\NW\1/4\, Cleburne 
        County, containing 399.40 acres, more or less.
            Huntsville Meridian, Township 13 South, Range 9 East, 
        Section 28, SE\1/4\, Calhoun County, containing 160.00 acres, 
        more or less.
    (b) Administration.--(1) Subject to valid existing rights, all 
Federal lands described under subsection (a) are hereby added to and 
shall be administered as part of the Talladega National Forest, and the 
Secretary of the Interior shall transfer, without reimbursement, 
administrative jurisdiction over such lands to the Secretary of 
Agriculture.
    (2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the 
validity of or the terms and conditions of any existing right-of-way, 
easement, lease, license, or permit on lands transferred by subsection 
(a), except that such lands shall be administered by the Forest 
Service. Reissuance of any authorization shall be in accordance with 
the laws and regulations generally applying to the Forest Service, and 
the change of jurisdiction over such lands resulting from the enactment 
of this Act shall not constitute a ground for the denial of renewal or 
reissuance of such authorization.
            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```