alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-23,129-10

EX PARTE TIMMY LYNN DUKE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W91-31292-L (E) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER FIVE

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

burglary of a habitation and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-five years. 

Applicant alleges that he is actuallyinnocent based upon newly discovered evidence, his plea

was involuntary, and he received ineffective assistance of counsel in this case resulting in an

involuntary plea of guilty.

The habeas record has been properly forwarded to this Court by the district clerk pursuant

to TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). However, the record has been forwarded without the trial court
entering findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Applicant’s claims and the parties have

filed an agreed motion to remand this matter because they “concur that there are material unresolved

issues concerning the Applicant’s innocence and the voluntariness of his plea that require the

development of further evidence.” This motion has also been agreed to by the trial court.

We remand this application to the Criminal District Court Number Five of Dallas County to

allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: November 15, 2017

Do not publish
Exhibit 10.13 to Intricon Corporation Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005






Exhibit
10.13


Summary
Sheet for Chief Executive Officer Compensation


Base
Salary


          The
following table sets forth the current base salaries of IntriCon Corporation’s
CEO and each of the executive officers who will be named in the Summary
Compensation Table incorporated by reference into IntriCon Corporation’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 from the proxy
statement that will be filed in connection with the 2006 annual shareholders’
meeting (the “Named Executive Officers”). 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Name and Position

	
 

	
Base
  Salary

	
 


	


	
 

	



	
 


	
Mark S. Gorder, President and Chief Executive
  Officer

	
 

	
 

	
$

	
300,000

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Chris Conger, Vice President, Engineering

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
140,000

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Michael Geraci, vice President, Sales

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
150,000

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Dennis Gonsior, Vice President, Global Operations

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
140,000

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
William J. Kullback, Chief Financial Officer, Vice
  President, Treasurer and Secretary

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
185,000

	
 

	
 





Bonuses


          The
Compensation Committee also approved the 2006 Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”),
which is not set forth in a written agreement. Pursuant to the Bonus Plan, each
of the Named Executive Officers is eligible to receive a cash bonus based on
the Corporation exceeding certain earnings per share target amounts for the
fiscal year 2006 (calculated after giving effect to any bonuses accrued under
the Bonus Plan). Depending upon the earnings per share target amount, Mr.
Gorder is eligible to receive a bonus up to 100% of his base salary and each of
the other Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive a bonus up to 50% of
their respective base salary. 


Plans
and Other Arrangements


The Named Executive Officers are also eligible to:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
•

	
Participate in the 2006 Bonus Plan;


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
•

	
Participate in the 2001 Stock Option Plan;


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
•

	
If approved by shareholders at the 2006 annual
  meeting, participate in the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan; and


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
•

	
Participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit
  programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health,
  disability and life insurance programs, and qualified 401(k) plan.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 29, 1995 (89), Para 89.11 Call of the House]
[Page 1079]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.89.11  call of the house

  On motion of Mr. SABO, a call of the House was ordered.
  A quorum not being present,
  The call was taken by electronic device, and the following-named 
Members responded--
```
§ 176.70 Stowage requirements for marine pollutants. ( a ) Marine pollutants must be properly stowed and secured to minimize the hazards to the marine environment without impairing the safety of the ship and the persons on board.
( b ) Where stowage is permitted “on deck or under deck”, under deck stowage is preferred except when a weather deck provides equivalent protection.
( c ) Where stowage “on deck only” is required, preference should be given to stowage on well-protected decks or to stowage inboard in sheltered areas of exposed decks.
[Amdt. 176-31, 57 FR 52940, Nov. 5, 1992]
#### § 1113.8 Witness examination; order of procedure.

Witnesses will be orally examined under oath before the officer unless the facts are presented to the Board in the manner provided under modified procedure. In formal complaint, application, and investigation proceedings, complainant, applicant, and respondent, respectively, shall open and close at the hearing. In the event of further hearings granted on petition, the petitioners requesting further hearing shall open and close the proceeding. Instances exist in which parties other than the respondent may open and close in investigations where the burden of proof is not upon the respondent. Interveners shall follow the party on whose behalf the intervention is made. The foregoing order of presentation may be varied by the officer.

[47 FR 49559, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52712, Oct. 8, 1996; 81 FR 8854, Feb. 23, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 145 (Monday, July 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b 
(c)(6). Grant applications for the Announcement of Availability of 
Funds for Grants regarding Minority Research Infrastructure Support 
Program (M-RISP) applications are to be reviewed and discussed at this 
meeting. These discussions are likely to reveal personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the applications. This 
information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited 
statutes.
    SEP Meeting on: Minority Research Infrastructure Support Program 
(M-RISP).
    Date: August 23, 2007 (Open on August 23 from 2 p.m to 2:15 p.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: John M. Eisenberg Building, AHRQ Conference Center, 540 
Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Telephone 
(301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: July 23, 2007.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 07-3679 Filed 7-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biovest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
F. Belleau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, thAT:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
   Company.



                                                     /s/Thomas F. Belleau
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Thomas F. Belleau
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     August 19, 2002







                                                                              25
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Rooney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daniel RooneyDaniel RooneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofSCI Engineered Materials, Inc.February 28, 2011
I

Jeremy Ramone Bailey, Petitioner,
v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil ActionNo. Warden Dawn E. Grounds 

### etat., ) ) ) ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED MAR 2 1

## 2011 Clerk. 

## u.s. District &Bankruptcy 

### Courts forthe District of Columbia

Petitioner, proceeding

### pro se, has submitted an application for a writ of

### habeas corpus along with an application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed 

### informapauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner is a Texas state prisoner in NewBoston, Texas, challenging a conviction entered by the 71 5t Judicial District Court ofHarrison County, Texas. 

### See Pet. at 2, 5-6. Federal court review ofstate convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only afterthe exhaustion of available state remedies. 

### See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under thejUdgment and sentence ofa State court ..

. may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each ofsuch district courts shall have concurrentjurisdictionto entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. 

### § 2241(d). Petitioner has no recourse here. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Un ed States DIstnctJudge Date:

### March~, 2011
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131498 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SUZANNE VERBRUGGHE, as Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Justices Estate of George Verbrugghe, 

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131498 

 COA: 263686 

Macomb CC: 04-004423-NH 

SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL – 

MACOMB COUNTY, INC.,

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ARSENIO V. DeLEON, M.D.,

and MARIUS LAURINAITIS, M.D., 

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

JAVED ZIA, M.D., 

 Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of October 17, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 

2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-6). On order of the Court, the 

case having been decided on April 9, 2008, 480 Mich 1159 (2008), the application is 

again considered, and in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of 

the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

reconsideration in light of Washington v Sinai Hospital of Greater Detroit, 478 Mich 412 

(2007), and Braverman, supra. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
-----Original Message----- 

From: mak714@roadrunner.com [mailto:mak714@roadrunner.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

magy king 

3 wiley road 

camden, ME 04843
#### Henry Hoffman, *Respondent, v.*William S. Marvin and others, *Appellants.*

— Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
# EUR-Lex - 52003PC0455 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003PC0455

**Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing certain Directives on the hygiene of foodstuffs and the health conditions for the production and placing on the market of certain products of animal origin intended for human consumption, and amending Directives 89/662/EEC and 91/67/EEC (presented by the Commission pursuant to article 250(2) of the EC Treaty) /* COM/2003/0455 final - COD 2000/0182 */ **

*

*

Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL repealing certain Directives on the hygiene of foodstuffs and the health conditions for the production and placing on the market of certain products of animal origin intended for human consumption, and amending Directives 89/662/EEC and 91/67/EEC (presented by the Commission pursuant to article 250(2) of the EC Treaty)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

I. PROCEDURE

1. On 14 July 2000, the Commission adopted a package of five proposals aiming to recast Community food hygiene legislation [Document COM (2000) 438]. The package was submitted to the Council and the European Parliament on 24 July 2000 for adoption by co-decision.

(Except for the fourth proposal of the package which was based on Article 37 of the Treaty and already adopted as Council Directive 2002/99/EC).

2. On 3 June 2003, the European Parliament has in first reading given a favourable opinion on the fifth proposal [2000/0182(COD)] of the package, with one amendment, accepted by the Commission.

(A favourable opinion on the first and second proposals was already given in May 2002, and a favourable opinion on the third proposal was given on 5 June 2003).

3. The present proposal amends the fifth proposal of the package so as to take into account the amendment of the European Parliament.

II. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROPOSAL

4. The proposal aims to repeal 17 Council Directives further to the recast of the Community rules on food hygiene.

The proposal also contains a "standstill" clause that must ensure that the implementing decisions based on these 17 Directives remain in place.

III. OVERVIEW OF AMENDMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

5. The proposal foresees that:

"Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 January 2004 at the latest. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof."

The amendment of the European Parliament states that:

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [ insert date : (one year after the entry into force of the Directive)]. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

This seems a reasonable approach since the formal adoption of the package of proposals is foreseen for after 1 January 2004.

IV. CONCLUSION

6. Pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC-Treaty, the Commission amends it proposals in accordance with the lines set out above.
#### § 78.17-30 Examination of boilers and machinery.

It shall be the duty of the chief engineer when assuming charge of the boilers and machinery of a vessel to examine them thoroughly. If any parts thereof are in bad condition, the fact shall immediately be reported to the master, owner or agent, and the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51205, Sept. 30, 1997]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 29, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending February 8, 2014

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FROST BANK                | * Branch       | Frost Bank, San Antonio, Texas, to establish a branch at 7859 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite C-01, Dallas, Texas 75230.                                               | Newspaper:01/29/2014Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | 01/29/2014    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|MCGREGOR BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A1          | McGregor Bancshares, Inc., McGregor, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The First National Bank of McGregor, McGregor, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/07/2014 
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | 03/07/2014    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
)00 

64 Illinois Valley Regional (VYS) 

Class E, 700'AGL and above 

Radio: 123.0 CTAF 

Joliet Regional (JOT) 

Radio: CTAF 122.7 

-+~~-+1--__.-r-- .! Chicago O'Hare lnt'l (ORO). 

Class B. CT 120.75 121.15 126.9