alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                 |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                 |   |
| DATE: August 5, 2011 | By:    | /s/ William L. Prater                |   |
|                 |   | William L. Prater                    |   |
|                 |   | Treasurer andChief Financial Officer |   |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 154 (Friday, August 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45058-45059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.
    Date: August 16, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jo Pelham, BA, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4102, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1786, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a0a1f16121b17103a19090854141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81f1e4ede9e0ecebc1e2f2f3afefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing

[[Page 45059]]

limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 3, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3904 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Seth G. Rowley and others, Appellants, v. The First Methodist Episcopal Society in Medina, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Corlett, J.
#### James W. Finley, *Administrator, etc., Appellant, v.*Samuel S. Bent, *Executor, etc.,*and others, *Respondents.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
-----Original Message----- 

From: sherry_bradley@msn.com [mailto:sherry_bradley@msn.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sherry Bradley 

518 Entrada DR. #102 

Novato, CA 94949
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

     In connection with the Annual Report of VirtualHealth Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott A. Haire, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.        § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|  |   |   |   | (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |   |   |
|--|--------|--------|--------|-----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  |        |   |
|  |   |   |   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |   |   |

Date: April 14, 2009          

/s/ Scott A. Haire                       Scott A. Haire        Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-3-2005

Beddini v. Dilts

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-4151

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Beddini v. Dilts" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1069.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1069
CPS-177 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 04-4151

________________

JANET BEDDINI

 v.

THOMAS H. DILTS, P.J.S.C.

 Jan Beddini,

 Appellant

____________________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court

For the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civ. No. 04-cv-03526)

District Judge: Honorable Stanley R. Chesler

_______________________________________

Submitted For Possible Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

March 24, 2005

BEFORE: ALITO, McKEE and AMBRO, CIRCUIT JUDGES

(Filed June 3, 2005)

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM

Janet Beddini appeals the District Court’s order granting appellee’s motion to
2

dismiss. We conclude that the District Court’s decision was proper, and, therefore, will

dismiss this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). 

In July 2004 Beddini filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 &

1986. She alleged that Honorable Thomas H. Dilts, Presiding Judge, Superior Court of

Somerset County, New Jersey, violated her Fourteenth Amendment rights when he ruled

on her motions in her family law case. Judge Dilts filed a motion to dismiss the

complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (2) and (6), which was granted by the

District Court. Beddini timely appealed.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may dismiss this appeal

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) if it has no arguable basis in law or fact. Neitzke

v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). 

The District Court granted the motion to dismiss and concluded that Judge Dilts

was absolutely immune from suit. We agree. Judge Dilts acted in his judicial capacity

when ruling on the motions at issue. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991). 

Beddini’s claim that Judge Dilts conspired with others or acted maliciously does not alter

the application of judicial immunity to this case. See Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554

(1967); see, e.g., Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 26-27 (1980). 

For the foregoing reasons, we will dismiss Beddini’s appeal pursuant to

§ 1915(e)(2).
••' • 1.- 1 I , 1
. ' ; , \ ' , %

Augus t 11.201 0 '•; • ;.; v •, • , • /,._,. , Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Regardin g Grant

Application s Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra m Under 4 9 U.S.C
. 4174 3 e t

seq . Docke t DOT-OST-2010-012 4

T o WhomI t

Ma y Concern : 1 a mcontactin g yo u i

n suppor t o f th e Tellurid e Airpor

t Authority' s reques t

fo r aSmal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

JProgra mgran t fromth e Departmen t

o f Transportation
. Over th e pas t few year s th e enplanement s a t th e Tellurid e Airport

hav e decrease d from over 15,00 0 i n 200 7 to jus t

7,00 0 enplanement s i

n 2009
. Thi s ha s increase d fare s an d cause d local residents , second-hom e owner s an d visitor s to hav e t o driv e grea t distance s t o trave l to Tellurid e fromairport s a s fa r a s tw o an d thre e hour s away . Becaus e Tellurid e ha s acommunity econom y highl y dependen t

o n touris man d air servic e access ; increasin g ou r presen t air acces s i s critical t o th e developmen t o f other loca l industrie s a s wel l a s supportin g ou r local school s an d medical needs
. Our community' s acces s t o a

n ai r servic e grant

wil l giv e Tellurid e acompetitiv e chanc e to increas e air

service , reduc e airfare s an d recove r ai r sea t capacity that

ha s bee n recentl y lost
. Tellurid e Regiona l Airport i s th e highes t

altitud e commercial airport i n th e Unite d States , whic h als o offer s additiona l challenge s mattractin g ne w ai r servic e an d require s additional fundin g i n orde r t o d o so . Start-u p fundin g suppor t vi ath e Smal l Communit

y Air Servic e Gran t

progra mwoul d hel p immensel y wit h ou r ai r servic e goals
. Than k yo u i n advanc e fo r

you r hel p an d consideration
. Sincerely , Dav e Rile y CE O Tellurid e Sk

i & Gol f

.^>f>.

T Mountai n Villag e Boulevar d • rclluridc
. C O H!4.Sr

) ')7().72Ji.7:^(» 2 I

H • '»70.72a.7.%8Fa \ www.relluriflrSkiiindCioKl'luh.coj n
-----Original Message----- 

From: jbereicua@bellsouth.net [mailto:jbereicua@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

jose bereicua 

1945 emilio ln 

west palm beach, FL 33406
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,019,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,571,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,027,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,395,000
<PP&E>                                       3,661,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,018,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,123,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,960,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,266,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,123,000
<SALES>                                      8,020,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        4,091,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,863,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,180,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (115,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,295,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
§ 179.12 Interior heater systems. ( a ) Interior heater systems shall be of approved design and materials. If a tank is divided into compartments, a separate system shall be provided for each compartment.
( b ) Each interior heater system shall be hydrostatically tested at not less than 13.79 bar (200 psig) and shall hold the pressure for 10 minutes without leakage or evidence of distress.
[Amdt. 179-52, 61 FR 28678, June 5, 1996, as amended by 66 FR 45390, Aug. 28, 2001]
#### Charles G. Judd and another, *Respondents, v.*George W. Baskin, Appellant.—

Order affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,327
<INVENTORY>                                      1,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,392
<PP&E>                                          72,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,643
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,839
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
98-1993.

#### State v. Fuson.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1136. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 98-1779, *State v. Conyers,*Lucas App. No. L-97-1327, and 98-1929, *State v. Schultz,*Hamilton App. No. C-970954; briefing schedule stayed.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                       5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         927,021
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    582,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,095,119
<PP&E>                                       1,785,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 469,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,495,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                       221,420
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,195,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,495,519
<SALES>                                      1,356,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,250
<CGS>                                          585,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,230,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                    91,763
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            142,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        



</TABLE>
#### Eugene A. Pratt, Respondent, v. Isaac Seeley, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kathryn.igarashi@gmail.com [mailto:kathryn.igarashi@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kathryn Igarashi 

11215 Huntley Place 

Culver City, CA 90230
From: amismc@yahoo.com [mailto:amismc@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Amy McKeon 

3600 1/2 33rd Ave. SW 

Seattle, WA 98126
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

VIA E-MAIL 

David Y. Bannard, Esq. 

Foley & Lardner LLP 

111 Huntington Ave 

Boston, MA 02199 

Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

November 20, 2015 

Re: Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. v. Horry County Department of Airports, 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-05 (regulations.gov docket FAA-2014-0538) 

Dear Mr. Bannard: 

Enclosed are copies of documents requested in your November 17 letter to Mr. Robert 

Hawks, which constitute the administrative record for the Director's Determination dated 

October 7, 2015. 

We also are working to ensure all documents constituting the administrative record are added 

to the electronic docket at regulations.gov docket number FAA-2014-0538. 

We hope this response is helpful. 

Sharon Long 

Part 16 Docket Cle 

cc: Robert G. Eastman 

Enclosures 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 20, 2015, I caused to be emailed a true copy of the 

foregoing LETTER addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Robert G. Eastman, Esq. 

Eastman & Associates, LLC 

P.O. Box 180 

Charleston, SC 29402 

robertgeastman@msn.com 

Counsel for Respondent 

David Y. Bannard, Esq. 

Jeffrey R. Blease, Esq. 

Jaclyn V. Piltch, Esq. 

Foley & Lardner LLP 

111 Huntington Avenue 

Boston, MA 02199 

dbannard@foley.com 

jblease@foley.com 

jpiltch@foley.com 

Hand-delivered and emailed to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100) 

haron Long 

Part 16 Docket Clerk 

FAA Office of the Chief Counsel