alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending May 4, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,189
<PP&E>                                         458,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                 198,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 345,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,617
<BONDS>                                        131,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,376
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   345,419
<SALES>                                         46,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,553
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,406)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
TRAVELLING SCREEN VELOCITY CALCULATIONS LAKEWATER PUMP STATION (LWPS) NOS. 1 AND 2 ARCELORMITTAL BURNS HARBOR LLC

LWPS No. 1 Calculations Given:

• Four travelling screens are operating during normal conditions • Elevation of bottom of wet well at screens is 558.7 feet • Water elevation at screens is about 578.8 feet • Water depth at screens is 20.1 feet (578.8-558.7 feet) • Each basket of travelling screen has a total vertical height of 2 feet (including frame around the screen portion) • Screen portion of each basket is 1.75 feet high and 10 feet wide for a total screen area of 17.5 sq. feet (see drawing). • 1 cu. foot of water is 7.48 gallons • 2008 flow at LWPS No. 1 averaged 58,601 gallons per minute (gpm) Calculations: 20.1 feet water depth ÷ 2 fe et rged baskets et per bask ≈ 10 subme ൌ ܣ ൌ ݁ܽݎܣ ݁݁݊ݎܵܿ .ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 17.5 ݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ ൈ ݏݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ 10 ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ .ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 700 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݈݁݅݊݃ ݎ ൈ ݒܽ ݐ 4 58,60 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݈ܽ ݄݃ݑ݋ݎ݄ݐ ݓ݋݈ܨ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 1 ݈݃ܽ. 8 ൈ ݉݌݃ 1 7.4 ݁ݐݑ݉݅݊ ݎ݁݌ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 7,834 ൌ ݎܣ ൊ ݓ݋݈ܨ ൌ ݕݐܿ݅݋ܸ݈݁ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 7,834 ݁ܽ ൌ ݉݅݊ ൊ 700 ݏ

ൌ ݐ݂ 11.2 ݉݅݊ /݉݅݊ݐ݂ 11.2 ൌ ݐ݂ .ݍ

ൈ 1 ݉݅݊ ݁ܿݏ 60 ൌ ݐ݂ 0.19 ݁ܿݏLWPS No. 2 Calculations Given:

• Four travelling screens are operating during normal conditions • Elevation of bottom of wet well at screens is 540.0 feet • Water elevation at screens is about 578.8 feet • Water depth at screens is 38.8 feet (578.8-540.0 feet) • Each basket of travelling screen has a total vertical height of 2 feet (including frame around the screen portion) • Screen portion of each basket is 1.5 feet high and 14 feet wide for a total screen area of 21 sq. feet (see drawing). • 1 cu. foot of water is 7.48 gallons • 2008 flow at LWPS No. 2 averaged 197,541 gallons per minute (gpm) Calculations: 38.8 feet water depth ÷ 2 fe ske erged baskets et per ba t ≈ 19 subm ൌ ܣ ൌ ݁ܽݎܣ ݁݁݊ݎܵܿ .ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 21 ݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ ൈ ݏݐ݇݁ݏܾܽ 19 ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ .ݐ݂ .ݍݏ 1,596 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݅݊݃ ൈ ݈݁ݒܽݎݐ 4 197 ൌ ݏ݁݁݊ݎܿݏ ݈݈ܽ ݄݃ݑ݋ݎ݄ݐ ݓ݋݈ܨ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 1 ݈݃ܽ. .48 ൈ ݉݌݃ ,541 7 ݁ݐݑ݉݅݊ ݎ݁݌ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 26,409 ൌ ݁ݎܣ ൊ ݓ݋݈ܨ ൌ ݕݐܿ݅݋ܸ݈݁ .ݐ݂ .ݑܿ 26,409 ൌ ܽ ݉݅݊ /݉݅݊ݐ݂ 16.55 ൌ ݐ݂ .ݍ ൊ ݏ 1,596

ൌ ݐ݂ 16.55 ݉݅݊ ൈ 1 ݉݅݊ ݁ܿݏ 60 ൌ ݐ݂ 0.28 ݁ܿݏ
§ 175.630 Special requirements for Division 6.1 (poisonous) material and Division 6.2 (infectious substances) materials. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) No person may operate an aircraft that has been used to transport any package required to bear a POISON or POISON INHALATION HAZARD label unless, upon removal of such package, the area in the aircraft in which it was carried is visually inspected for evidence of leakage, spillage, or other contamination. All contamination discovered must be either isolated or removed from the aircraft.
( c ) When unloaded from the aircraft, each package, overpack, pallet, or unit load device containing a Division 6.2 material must be inspected for signs of leakage. If evidence of leakage is found, the cargo compartment in which the package, overpack, or unit load device was transported must be disinfected. Disinfection may be by any means that will make the material released ineffective at transmitting disease.
[71 FR 14604, Mar. 22, 2006, as amended at 71 FR 32263, June 2, 2006; 80 FR 1164, Jan. 8, 2015; 85 FR 83402, Dec. 21, 2020]
#### § 176.184 Class 1 (explosive) materials of Compatibility Group L.

Class 1 (explosive) materials in compatibility group L may not be handled in a port area without the special permission of, and subject to any special precautions required by, the COTP.
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC1107(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC1107(01)

**List of appropriate certificates recognised under the procedure laid down in Article 18, paragraph 3 of Directive 2001/25/EC on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Situation on 17.2.2003) **

*
Official Journal C 268 , 07/11/2003 P. 0007 - 0023 *

List of appropriate certificates recognised under the procedure laid down in Article 18, paragraph 3 of Directive 2001/25/EC on the minimum level of training of seafarers(1)

(Situation on 17 February 2003)

(2003/C 268/04)

>TABLE>

(1) The Netherlands and the United Kingdom did not proceed to the recognition of individual maritime education and training institutes and opted for the recognition of all the maritime education and training institutes approved by the third countries concerned.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2016

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement that

commissioned officers of the Armed Services be initially appointed as

Reserve officers regardless of the source of their commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1995

Mr. UNDERWOOD (for himself, Mr. REED, and Mr. DORNAN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the

requirement that commissioned officers of the Armed

Services be initially appointed as Reserve officers regardless of the source of their commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT THAT COM4 MISSIONED OFFICERS BE INITIALLY AP5 POINTED IN A RESERVE GRADE.

6 Section 532 of title 10, United States Code, is

7 amended by striking out subsection (e).

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2694

___________

Dale Williams, Sr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Cal Ludeman, Commissioner of Human *

Services; James Arneson, Supervisor, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Polk County Social Services, in their *

individual and official capacities, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 7, 2012

Filed: March 23, 2012

___________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dale Williams, Sr., was indefinitely committed in May 2005 under the

Minnesota Sex Offender Program, a program administered by the Minnesota

Department of Human Services. He is currently a civil detainee in a MDHS facility

in Carlton County, Minnesota. His son is a vulnerable adult who resides in a group

home after the Polk County District Court appointed a guardian for the son in 2004. 

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Williams alleges that Cal Ludeman, Commissioner

of Human Services, and James Arneson, a Polk County Social Services supervisor,
violated Williams’s federal constitutional right to contact his son by denying visits,

blocking phone calls, and preventing his son from writing. The district court

1

dismissed these claims based upon defendants’ showing that they were not personally

involved in limiting contacts between Williams and his son. Williams appeals. 

After careful de novo review, we agree with the district court that the claims

must be dismissed because Williams failed to present evidence that Ludeman acted

in other than a supervisory capacity or that Arneson had any control over Williams’s

son. See Moore v. Indehar, 514 F.3d 756, 757-758 (8th Cir. 2008). We also note that

Williams may well have adequate remedies under state law that he has not exhausted. 

To the extent the MDHS custodians are limiting attempts to contact his son -- which

he does not allege -- he should challenge those restrictions through an institutional

grievance. To the extent the son’s group home is blocking Williams’s attempted

contacts, no doubt with the guardian’s approval, Williams is presumably an interested

person who may petition the Polk County District Court for appropriate relief. See

Minn. Stat. §§ 524.5-316(b), 524.5-317(b). 

We further conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in not

allowing Williams to amend his complaint and therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin

L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
From: ktdid3542@yahoo.com [mailto:ktdid3542@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Kate Gibson 

2210 NW Everett 

Portland, OR 97210
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 20, 2007, 2 p.m. to February 20, 2007, 3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 12, 2007, FR 07-100.                

The February 20, 2007 Meeting Panel Name was changed from VAD Technologies to Modified Hemoglobin Production. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 24, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-398 Filed 1-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
See Exh ib i t G.Inc., a seaplane leas i ng company i n St. Cro ixto Aug. 2011 Sept. 2011 to present D i rector of Operat i ons, C i ty W i ngs, Inc.and member of the board of d i rectors
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         7,605,884
<SECURITIES>                                   000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                   13,390
<INVENTORY>                                    000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,045,684
<PP&E>                                         32,440,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,976,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          401,391
<BONDS>                                        31,025,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          000
<PREFERRED>                                    000
<COMMON>                                       000
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,325,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,976,930
<SALES>                                        3,773,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,443,565
<CGS>                                          000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,534,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               476,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,249,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,801,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,801,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                000
<CHANGES>                                      000
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,801,326)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (25.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (25.39)



</TABLE>
*Wednesday, December 23, 1998*

MERIT DOCKET

98-2226.

#### State ex rel. Tinsler v. Muehlfeld.

In Prohibition. On answer of respondent State Bank and Trust Company and motion to dismiss of State Bank and Trust Company; on motion to dismiss by John J. Hunter, Jr., answer of respondent by Judge Keith Muehlfeld, motion to dismiss by Judge Keith Muehlfeld, motion to strike motion to dismiss of John J. Hunter, Jr., motion to strike answer of State Bank and Trust Company, and motion to strike motion to dismiss of State Bank and Trust Company; and on motion to strike answer of Judge Keith Muehlfeld and motion to strike motion to dismiss of Judge Keith Muehlfeld.

*Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 178.338-12 Shear section.

Unless the valve is located in a rear cabinet forward of and protected by the bumper (see § 178.338-10(c)), the design and installation of each valve, damage to which could result in loss of liquid or vapor, must incorporate a shear section or breakage groove adjacent to, and outboard of, the valve. The shear section or breakage groove must yield or break under strain without damage to the valve that would allow the loss of liquid or vapor. The protection specified in § 178.338-10 is not a substitute for a shear section or breakage groove.

[Amdt. 178-77, 49 FR 24316, June 12, 1984]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ )

TELEMACHOS FIOURIS , et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10

- 1225 (PLF)

)

THE TURKISH CYPRIOT COMMUNITY d/b/a )

TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN )

CYPRUS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On September 30, 2014, the Court dismissed Toumazou v. Turkish Republic of

Northern Cyprus , Civil Action No. 09

- 1967, with prejudice, which is a related case

“indistinguishable by facts or law. ” See Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal at 1 n.1, Toumazou v.

Turki sh Republic of Northern Cyprus

, No. 09

- cv

- 1967 (D.D.C. Oct. 29, 2014), ECF No. 55.

The Court therefore ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why this case should not be

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Court’s September 30, 2014 Order and Oc tober 9, 2014

Opinion in Toumazou . Plaintiff failed to respond. I t is hereby2 ORDERED that th e complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice

. The Clerk of

Court shall remove this case from the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable Order. See

F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(a)

.

SO ORDERED.

/s/

_______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: October 31, 2014
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending November 19, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST BANK CORP   | CIC           | Samuel T. Sicard, individually and as trustee of the Samuel M. Sicard Living Trust, to retain ownership of 11.80% of the voting shares of First Bank Corp., Fort Smith, Arkansas. Samuel T. Sicard became trustee and acquired voting control of the trust's shares upon the death of his father, Samuel M. Sicard. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/07/2011
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | 12/07/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 30, 1995 (90), Para 90.31 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1094]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.90.31  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 1289: Ms. Eshoo.
       H.R. 1883: Mr. White.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: silversamstar@gmail.com [mailto:silversamstar@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Reynolds 

16357 Aurora Ave N 

Shoreline, WA 98133
Editorial Note on Part 193
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

§ 193.2703 Design and fabrication. For the design and fabrication of components, each operator shall use— ( a ) With respect to design, persons who have demonstrated competence by training or experience in the design of comparable components.
( b ) With respect to fabrication, persons who have demonstrated competence by training or experience in the fabrication of comparable components.
[45 FR 9219, Feb. 11, 1980]
#### § 1103.22 Restraining clients from improprieties.

A practitioner should see that his clients act with the same restraint that the practitioner himself uses, particularly with reference to the client's conduct toward the Board, fellow practitioners, witnesses and other litigants. If a client persists in improper conduct, the practitioner should terminate their relationship.
#### § 1248.6 Public inspection—railroad reports.

The individual commodity statistics reports of class I railroads, required to be filed, for the year beginning January 1, 1964, or for quarters thereof, and for the quarters of 1965, as the case might be, under the terms of § 123.1, shall not be open to public inspection, and such required commodity statistics reports, to be filed for the years beginning January 1, 1965, and for the quarters of the year beginning January 1, 1966, and later, to the extent that they involve traffic of less than three shippers, reportable in one of the commodity reporting classes, may be excluded from a railroad's regular freight commodity statistics report and filed in a supplemental report which will not be open for public inspection, except that access to supplemental reports may be given upon approval by the Board.

[32 FR 20466, Dec. 20, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 6881, Feb. 17, 1982]