alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.                     

*Date:*                         August 16, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jo Pelham, BA, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4102, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1786,                         *pelhamj@csr.nih.gov.*

                        This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing                               ( print page 45059)                            limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306,  Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 3, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3904  Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.625 Odorization of gas. ( a ) A combustible gas in a distribution line must contain a natural odorant or be odorized so that at a concentration in air of one-fifth of the lower explosive limit, the gas is readily detectable by a person with a normal sense of smell.
( b ) After December 31, 1976, a combustible gas in a transmission line in a Class 3 or Class 4 location must comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section unless: ( 1 ) At least 50 percent of the length of the line downstream from that location is in a Class 1 or Class 2 location;
( 2 ) The line transports gas to any of the following facilities which received gas without an odorant from that line before May 5, 1975; ( i ) An underground storage field;
( ii ) A gas processing plant;
( iii ) A gas dehydration plant; or
( iv ) An industrial plant using gas in a process where the presence of an odorant: ( A ) Makes the end product unfit for the purpose for which it is intended;
( B ) Reduces the activity of a catalyst; or
( C ) Reduces the percentage completion of a chemical reaction;
( 3 ) In the case of a lateral line which transports gas to a distribution center, at least 50 percent of the length of that line is in a Class 1 or Class 2 location; or
( 4 ) The combustible gas is hydrogen intended for use as a feedstock in a manufacturing process.
( c ) In the concentrations in which it is used, the odorant in combustible gases must comply with the following: ( 1 ) The odorant may not be deleterious to persons, materials, or pipe.
( 2 ) The products of combustion from the odorant may not be toxic when breathed nor may they be corrosive or harmful to those materials to which the products of combustion will be exposed.
( d ) The odorant may not be soluble in water to an extent greater than 2.5 parts to 100 parts by weight.
( e ) Equipment for odorization must introduce the odorant without wide variations in the level of odorant.
( f ) To assure the proper concentration of odorant in accordance with this section, each operator must conduct periodic sampling of combustible gases using an instrument capable of determining the percentage of gas in air at which the odor becomes readily detectable. Operators of master meter systems may comply with this requirement by— ( 1 ) Receiving written verification from their gas source that the gas has the proper concentration of odorant; and
( 2 ) Conducting periodic “sniff” tests at the extremities of the system to confirm that the gas contains odorant.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 192.625, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of an open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board (Board) will hold a meeting to discuss topics related to the travel and tourism industry. The Board was established on October 1, 2003, and reconstituted October 1, 2005, to advise the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to the travel and tourism industry.

# DATES:

September 5, 2007.

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. (EDT).                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4830, Washington, DC, 20230. Because of building security, all non-government attendees must pre-register. This program will be physically accessible to people with disabilities. Seating is limited and will be on a first come, first served basis. Requests for sign language interpretation, other auxiliary aids, or pre-registration, should be submitted no later than August 29, 2007, to J. Marc Chittum, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone 202-482-4501,                         *Marc.Chittum@mail.doc.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        J. Marc Chittum, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 202-482-4501, e-mail:                         *Marc.Chittum@mail.doc.gov.*

Dated: August 7, 2007.

J. Marc Chittum,

Executive Secretary, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board.

[FR Doc. 07-3947 Filed 8-13-07; 4:54 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
| Signature                |         | Title                                                     |
|--------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |         |                                                      |
| /s/ Daniel Rooney        |         | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of        |
| Daniel Rooney            |         | the Board of Directors and Director  (principal |
|                |         | executive officer)                                        |
|                     |         |                                                      |
| /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie    |         | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                |
| Gerald S. Blaskie        |         | (principal financial officer and principal accounting     |
|                |         | officer)                                                  |
|                     |         |                                                      |
| /s/ Robert H. Peitz      |         | Director                                                  |
| Robert H. Peitz          |         |                                                      |
|                     |         |                                                      |
| /s/ Walter J. Doyle      |         | Director                                                  |
| Walter J. Doyle          |         |                                                      |
|                     |         |                                                      |
| /s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr. |         | Director                                                  |
| Robert J. Baker, Jr.     |         |                                                      |
|                     |         |                                                      |
| /s/ Edward W. Ungar      |         | Director                                                  |
| Edward W. Ungar          |    |                                                      |

----
#### The Mollie Gibson Consolidated Mining and Milling Company v. Summers.

The judgment in this case is affirmed upon the authority of *The Mollie Gibson Consolidated Mining and Milling Co. v. Sharp, ante,*321.

*Appeal from the District Court of Pitlcin County.*

*329Mr. James H. Brown and Mr. Milton Smith, for appellant.

Mr. Charles R. Bell, Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., and Mr. Tyson S. Dines, for appellee.

Bissell, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mary Summers brought this suit against the Mollie Gibson Company to recover for the injury resulting to her from the death of Michael Capíes, her son. She had judgment for seventeen hundred and fifty dollars. The company defended, but did not appear at the trial, and .the verdict was rendered on the plaintiff’s testimony. No objections were made to any of the proceedings except what is evidenced by a motion for a new trial.

This case, aside from this circumstance, is like the preceding one, and Capíes was killed at the same time that William Sharp was, and under the same circumstances, and the proof concerning it was precisely similar. The former case is accordingly referred to for a statement of the facts and a general statement of the law governing the rights of the parties. There is, however, this distinction between the two cases, but in our view it is totally unimportant: Mrs. Summers was Michael’s mother, and the case shows that for some considerable time prior to Michael’s death, he had from month to month sent his mother some fifteen or twenty dollars to aid in her support. This proof of itself, and without argument, disposes of the company’s contention that the plaintiff must prove a pecuniary injury in order to entitle her to recover. This she did when she gave evidence that one of the principal sources of her support had been lost through the death of her son.

The argument concerning the instructions is without foundation, since the company was unrepresented and interposed no objection to the instructions as given, and took no exception to the court’s action in the premises.

*330The motion for a new trial substantially repeats the grounds urged in a similar way in the preceding case. The reasons which we have given for the affirmance of the Sharp judgment serve to dispose of the present appeal, and the judgment will accordingly be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.315 Wrinkle bends in steel pipe. ( a ) A wrinkle bend may not be made on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 30 percent, or more, of SMYS.
( b ) Each wrinkle bend on steel pipe must comply with the following: ( 1 ) The bend must not have any sharp kinks.
( 2 ) When measured along the crotch of the bend, the wrinkles must be a distance of at least one pipe diameter.
( 3 ) On pipe 16 inches (406 millimeters) or larger in diameter, the bend may not have a deflection of more than 11 ⁄ 2° for each wrinkle.
( 4 ) On pipe containing a longitudinal weld the longitudinal seam must be as near as practicable to the neutral axis of the bend.
[35 FR 13257, Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37503, July 13, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2112 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2112

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to limit per diem payments by 
       the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to State veterans homes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 1995

Mr. Torricelli introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to limit per diem payments by 
       the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to State veterans homes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Health Care Commitment Act 
of 1995''.
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PER DIEM PAYMENTS TO STATE VETERANS HOMES.

    Section 1742 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) No payment or grant may be made to a State home under this 
subchapter if after the date of the enactment of this subsection the 
State home (or other State entity acting on behalf of the State home) 
enters into (or renews or extends) a contract for, or otherwise 
arranges for, the performance of any function at that home by 
individuals who are not employees of the State unless the Secretary 
certifies to Congress that the performance of that function at that 
home by individuals who are not employees of the State will not have an 
adverse effect on the quality of patient care and services provided at 
that home.''.
                                 <all>
```
NAC 445B.22017 Visible emissions: Maximu m opacity; determination and monitoring of

opacity. ( NRS 445B.210 ) 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and NAC 445B.2202 , no owner or operator may cause or permit the discharge into the atmosphere from any emission unit which is of an opacity equal to or greater than 20 percent. Opacity must be determined by one of the following me thods: (a) If opacity is determined by a visual measurement, it must be determined as set forth in Reference Method 9 in Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. Part 60. (b) If a source uses a continuous monitoring system for the measurement of opacity, the data must be reduced to 6 - minute averages as set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 60.13(h). 2. The provisions of this section and NAC 445B.2202 do not apply to that part of the opacity that consists of uncombined water. The burden of proof to establish the application of this exemption is upon the person seeking to come within the exemption. 3. If the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart D or Da apply to an emission uni t, the emission unit must be allowed one 6 - minute period per hour of not more than 27 percent opacity as set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 60.42(a)(2) and 40 C.F.R. § 60.42a(b). 4. The continuous monitoring system for monitoring opacity at a facility must be operated and maintained by the owner or operator specified in the permit for the facility in accordance with NAC 445B.256 to 445B.267 , inclusive. [Environmental Comm’n, Air Quality Reg. §§ 4.1 & 4.2, eff. 11 - 7 - 75; § 4.5.1.1, eff. 8 - 28 - 79]

— (NAC A 9 - 19 - 90; 10 - 30 - 95; R118 - 00, 9 - 25 - 2000; R036 - 05, 10 - 31 - 2005, eff. 4 - 1 - 2006)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.20 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 820]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.20  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. GOSS: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 156. 
     Resolution providing for further consideration of the bill 
     (H.R. 1561) to consolidate the foreign affairs agencies of 
     the United States; to authorize appropriations for the 
     Department of State and related agencies for fiscal years 
     1996 and 1997; to responsibly reduce the authorizations of 
     appropriations for United States foreign assistance programs 
     for fiscal years 1996 and 1997, and for other purposes (Rept. 
     No. 104-130). Referred to the House Calendar.
```
§ 550.201 Information orders. In furtherance of the purposes of this part— ( a ) The Commission may, by order, require any person (including any common carrier, tramp operator, bulk operator, shipper, shippers' association, ocean transportation intermediary, or marine terminal operator, or any officer, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent, or employee thereof), to file with the Commission a report, answers to questions, documentary material, or other information which the Commission considers necessary or appropriate;
( b ) The Commission may require a report or answers to questions to be made under oath;
( c ) The Commission may prescribe the form and the time for response to a report or answers to questions.
[58 FR 64910, Dec. 10, 1993. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 8008, 8009, Feb. 18, 1999]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew I. Sealfon,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer

October 20, 2003
§ 179.202-5 Tank head puncture resistance system. The DOT-117 specification tank car must have a tank head puncture resistance system in conformance with § 179.16(c). The full height head shields must have a minimum thickness of 1 ⁄ 2 inch. [80 FR 26749, May 8, 2015]
# EUR-Lex - 52003XC1011(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52003XC1011(01)

**Commission Communication — Financial statements of the ECSC in liquidation at 31 December 2002 **

*
Official Journal C 245 , 11/10/2003 P. 0002 - 0002 *

Commission Communication

Financial statements of the ECSC in liquidation at 31 December 2002

(2003/C 245/02)

In accordance with the commitments entered into on behalf of the ECSC in the field of loans, the Commission publishes the following financial statements, drawn up under Article 3 of Council Decision 2003/76/EC of 1 February 2003 and Article 6 of the annex to Council Decision 2003/77/EC of 1 February 2003:

- the balance sheet of the ECSC in liquidation at 31 December 2002;

- the profits-and-loss account for the period ending 31 December 2002;

- the allocation of the surplus for the period ending 31 December 2002;

- notes on the financial statements at 31 December 2002.

These financial statements are accompanied by the audit report by KPMG Audit, Luxembourg (only the French text is authentic).
From: debdd_m@yahoo.com [mailto:debdd_m@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Debra Darden-Munsell 

306 Maple Ridge St.. 

Ann Arbor, MI 48103
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December
      31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the  “Report”),  Edward H. Myles, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
      States Code) that:





(1)          The 
      Report  of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 22, 2006
            */s/
                Edward H. Myles*Edward
                H. MylesChief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.