alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending September 22, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|LAKESIDE BANK HOLDING COMPANY | CIC           | Retroactive change in control notice by Brian Darold Petersen, Livingston, Montana, to retain 25% or more of the shares of Lakeside Bank Holding Company, New Town, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Lakeside State Bank, New Town, North Dakota, and McKenzie County Bank, Watford City, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/24/2012
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 09/24/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                       | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF GLEN ULLIN, GLEN ULLIN, NORTH DAKOTA | 993353 | 05/07/2012 | 09/12/2012     | S         | Small Bank 
|PEOPLES BK WI, HAYWARD, WISCONSIN            | 456157 | 05/14/2012 | 09/07/2012     | O         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 179.400-16 Access to inner tank. ( a ) The inner tank must be provided with a means of access having a minimum inside diameter of 16 inches. Reinforcement of the access opening must be made of the same material used in the inner tank. The access closure must be of an approved material and design.
( b ) If a welded closure is used, it must be designed to allow it to be reopened by grinding or chipping and to be closed again by rewelding, preferably without a need for new parts. A cutting torch may not be used.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending September 21, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TC, BUFFALO, NEW YORK | 501105 | 07/09/2012 | 09/06/2013     | O         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-----Original Message----- 

From: L8nitekid@aol.com [mailto:L8nitekid@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Martha Martin 

39416 Bayridge Drive 

Prairieville, LA 70769
###### Editorial Note on Part 195

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 195 appear at 71 FR 33409, June 9, 2006.

#### § 195.426 Scraper and sphere facilities.

No operator may use a launcher or receiver that is not equipped with a relief device capable of safely relieving pressure in the barrel before insertion or removal of scrapers or spheres. The operator must use a suitable device to indicate that pressure has been relieved in the barrel or must provide a means to prevent insertion or removal of scrapers or spheres if pressure has not been relieved in the barrel.

[Amdt. 195-22, 46 FR 38360, July 27, 1981; 47 FR 32721, July 29, 1982]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7300

KENNY DREW SAYRE, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WAYNE L. GODWIN, Sheriff; ROBERT LINVILLE,

Chief Jailer; CARMINE J. CANN, Commissioner;

EDGAR C. SIEGRIST, Commissioner; JAMES A.

VARNER, Commissioner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-148-1)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenny Drew Sayre, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district

court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Sayre v. Godwin, No. CA-97-148-l

(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.                    

*Location:*                         All areas.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All workers.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1950 through December 31, 1973.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 07-3687 Filed 7-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 14, 1995 (79), Para 79.25 Senate Enrolled Bills Signed]
[Page 914]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.79.25  senate enrolled bills signed

  The SPEAKER announced his signature to enrolled bills of the Senate of 
the following titles:

       S. 349. An Act to reauthorize appropriations for the 
     Navajo-Hopi Relocation Housing Program.
       S. 441. An Act to reauthorize appropriations for certain 
     programs under the Indian Child Protection and Family 
     Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2403

KENNETH WAYNE DODSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RESTON SECURITY OFFICE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

NATIONAL IMAGERY AND MAPPING AGENCY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-96-1826-A)

Submitted: May 12, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Wayne Dodson, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Wayne Dodson noted an appeal of a proceeding held on

September 5, 1997, in which the magistrate judge deferred deciding

the issue of damages associated with a default judgment and instead

inquired into the sufficiency of service. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error.

Dodson's informal brief only addresses whether the magistrate

judge erred by refusing to hear argument on proof of damages at the

September 5, 1997, hearing. Dodson did not appeal the final judgment. Because Dodson only challenges the hearing in his informal

brief, it is the only issue reviewable on appeal. See 4th Cir.

Local R. 34(b).

Although this appeal was interlocutory when filed, the district court's entry of judgment before consideration of the appeal

confers jurisdiction on this court under the doctrine of cumulative

finality. See Equipment Fin. Group, Inc. v. Traverse Computer

Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347 (4th Cir. 1992). We find that the magistrate judge did not err in inquiring into the propriety of service,

a jurisdictional matter, rather than assessing damages. Accordingly, we affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: GeorgeinME@live.com [mailto:GeorgeinME@live.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

George Davis 

31 Kenduskeag Ave. #3 

Bangor, ME 04401
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141844 & (62)

DAVID W. ALLARD, as Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of LAURA J. WILAMOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141844 COA: 285633 Oakland CC: 2006-075483-NI JOSEPH A. SOVA and CLARKSTON STEEL, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and

CONRAD C. WILAMOWSKI, Defendant-Appellee, and

MIRASH BOJAJ, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED.

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Exhibit 23



                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in (I) the  Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration  Statement,  on Form S-3 (Registration No.
333-11521),  relating  to  Central  Hudson Gas &  Electric  Corporation's  Stock
Purchase  Plan, and (ii) the Prospectus  constituting  part of the  Registration
Statement, on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-65597), relating to $110 million of
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation's debt securities, of our report dated
January 29,  1999,  appearing  in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998.




/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
--------------------------------

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March 1, 1999
From: symptomrecital@hotmail.com [mailto:symptomrecital@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

m petti 

26906 greenbrooke 

olmsted falls, OH 44138
-----Original Message----- 

From: analiesedorff@att.net [mailto:analiesedorff@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Analiese Dorff 

472 Cottage Hill 

Elmhurst, IL 60126
From: pipacs@msn.com [mailto:pipacs@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Laurel Colton 

6025 Indian Brook Dr 

Matthews, NC 28104
#### § 176.720 Requirements for carriage of INF cargo in international transportation.

In addition to all other applicable requirements of this subchapter, a vessel carrying INF cargo (see § 176.2, under INF cargo definition) in international transportation must meet the requirements of the INF Code contained in the IMDG Code (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).

[68 FR 75748, Dec. 31, 2003]
§ 17.12 How may a state simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required state plans? ( a ) As used in this section: ( 1 ) *Simplify* means that a state may develop its own format, choose its own submission date, and select the planning period for a state plan.
( 2 ) *Consolidate* means that a state may meet statutory and regulatory requirements by combining two or more plans into one document and that the state can select the format, submission date, and planning period for the consolidated plan.
( 3 ) *Substitute* means that a state may use a plan or other document that it has developed for its own purposes to meet Federal requirements.
( b ) If not inconsistent with law, a state may decide to try to simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required state plans without prior approval by the Secretary.
( c ) The Secretary reviews each state plan that a state has simplified, consolidated, or substituted and accepts the plan only if its contents meet federal requirements.
-----Original Message----- 

From: sheesh@whidbey.com [mailto:sheesh@whidbey.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Dorothy Townsend-Tyers 

2369 Sanctuary Lane 

Langley, WA 98260
-----Original Message----- 

From: wkastern@bellsouth.net [mailto:wkastern@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

William Kastern 

7062 Lawrence Farm Lane, 

Randleman, NC 27317
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7160

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

QUINTON D. RAINEY, a/k/a Q,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District

Judge. (CR-94-69, CA-99-13-4)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton D. Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Quinton D. Rainey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Rainey, Nos. CR-94-69;

CA-99-13-4 (E.D. Va. July 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED