alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Strafford,

June, 1879.]

#### Lord *v.*Smith.

*Copeland Hdgerly,*for the plaintiff.

*Wells Burleigh,*for the defendant.

Report of a referee recommitted for a finding of the fact whether the plaintiff, a physician, in his attendance on the defendant, a married woman, was acting by her employment or that of her husband.
-----Original Message----- 

From: emilybaker@U2.com [mailto:emilybaker@U2.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Emily Baker 

4545 Arizona St Apt 214 

San Diego, CA 92116
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-1021 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and URUGUAY 

Signed at Washington April 29, 2008 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
URUGUAY 

Scientific Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington April 29, 2008; 

 Entered into force October 21, 2010. 

 With annexes. 

 










NOTE: In Article IV(B)(1) on this page, it appears that the word "pe" is a typo and "tyof" should be "type of".
-----Original Message----- 

From: rbirdsong@gmail.com [mailto:rbirdsong@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca Birdsong 

1619 E John St. #314 

Seattle, WA 98112
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gregory T. Barnum, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Computer NetworkTechnology Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.        Date: December 9, 2004 /s/ GREGORY T. BARNUM   Gregory T. Barnum   Chief Financial Officer   
32
§ 178.345-6 Supports and anchoring. ( a ) A cargo tank with a frame not integral to the cargo tank must have the tank secured by restraining devices to eliminate any motion between the tank and frame that may abrade the tank shell due to the stopping, starting, or turning of the cargo tank motor vehicle. The design calculations of the support elements must include the stresses indicated in § 178.345-3(b) and as generated by the loads described in § 178.345-3(c). Such restraining devices must be readily accessible for inspection and maintenance, except that insulation and jacketing are permitted to cover the restraining devices.
( b ) A cargo tank designed and constructed so that it constitutes, in whole or in part, the structural member used in lieu of a frame must be supported in such a manner that the resulting stress levels in the cargo tank do not exceed those specified in § 178.345-3(a). The design calculations of the support elements must include the stresses indicated in § 178.345-3(b) and as generated by the loads described in § 178.345-3(c).
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25023, June 12, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 178-105, 59 FR 55175, Nov. 3, 1994; Amdt. 178-118, 61 FR 51341, Oct. 1, 1996]
#### § 1549.107 Security coordinators.

Each certified cargo screening facility must have a Security Coordinator and designated alternate Security Coordinator appointed at the corporate level. In addition, each certified cargo screening facility must have a facility Security Coordinator and alternate facility Security Coordinator appointed at the facility level. The facility Security Coordinator must serve as the certified cargo screening facility's primary contact for security-related activities and communications with TSA, as set forth in the security program. The Security Coordinator and alternate appointed at the corporate level, as well as the facility Security Coordinator and alternate, must be available on a 24-hour, 7-days a week basis.
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>

                             VLSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                 CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE - unaudited
                       (thousands except per share data)
<CAPTION>
                                       Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                       ------------------   -----------------
                                      Sept. 26, Sept. 27,  Sept. 26, Sept. 27,
Primary Earnings per Share               1997      1996       1997      1996
----------------------------           --------  --------   --------  --------

<S>                                     <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>
Net income                              $28,506   $ 2,633    $49,825   $14,076
                                        =======   =======    =======   =======
Average number of common and  
  common equivalent shares: 
    Average common shares outstanding    46,629    45,900     46,417    45,758
    Dilutive options                      3,236     1,062      2,375       987
                                        -------   -------    -------   -------
Average number of common and
  common equivalent shares               49,865    46,962     48,792    46,745
                                        =======   =======    =======   =======
Earnings per common and common
  equivalent share                      $   .57   $   .06    $  1.02   $   .30
                                        =======   =======    =======   =======

Fully Diluted Earnings per Share
----------------------------------
Net income                              $28,506   $ 2,633    $49,825   $14,076
Add interest expense on convertible
  debt, net of tax effect (1)                 -         -          -         -
                                        -------   -------    -------   -------
Adjusted net income                     $28,506   $ 2,633    $49,825   $14,076
                                        =======   =======    =======   =======
Average number of common and common
  equivalent shares on a fully
  diluted basis
    Average common shares outstanding    46,629    45,900     46,417    45,758
    Dilutive options                      3,602     1,601      2,583     1,167
    Conversion of convertible debt (1)        -         -          -         -
                                        -------   -------    -------   -------
Average number of common and
  common equivalent shares on a
  fully diluted                          50,231    47,501     49,000    46,925
                                        =======   =======    =======   =======
Fully diluted earnings per common
  and common equivalent share           $   .57   $   .06    $  1.02   $   .30
                                        =======   =======    =======   =======

-----------------------------------------------

(1) The convertible debt is not included in the calculation of fully diluted
    earnings per share since its inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect.



	


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 The Federal Communications Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Thursday, June 28, 2007 from 4 p.m. to 11 p.m. The Commission will hold its meeting in Portland, Maine at: Portland High School, 284 Cumberland Ave., Portland, Maine. Link to Portland High School: 
                    *http://portland.portlandschools.org*. Link to Portland High School Directions: 
                    *http://portland.portlandschools.org/​main/​homeroom.htm*. At this meeting, the Commission will consider one item. The Commission also will hear presentations on perspectives on localism from two panels and comments from public parties. Item No.
Bureau
Subject1
Media
*Title:*
                             Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices; and Compatibility Between Cable Systems and Consumer Electronics Equipment. (CS Docket No. 97-80, PP Docket No. 00-67).*Summary:*
                             The Commission will consider a Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning proposed standards to ensure bidirectional compatibility of multichannel video programming distribution systems and consumer electronics equipment.
 A live audio cast of the hearing will be available at the FCC's Web site at 
                    *www.fcc.gov*
                     on a first-come, first-served basis. The FCC will provide sign language interpreters and open captioning for this event. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Include a description of the accommodation needed, and include a way we can contact you if we need more information. Please make your request as early as possible. Last minute requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill. Send an e-mail to 
                    *fcc504@fcc.gov*
                     or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). For additional information about the meeting, please visit the FCC's Web site at 
                    *http://www.fcc.gov.*
                     Direct all press inquiries to Mary Diamond at 202-418-2388 or David Fiske at 202-418-0513. If you are a member of the press and plan to attend the meeting in Portland, please contact Mary Diamond or David Fiske. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 07-3145 Filed 6-22-07; 12:28 pm] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

June 18, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford Motor Company regarding Tier 3

FROM: Michael Olechiw

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

This memo documents a meeting held on June 18, 2013 between representatives of Ford Motor 

Company and EPA to discuss Tier 3.

The agenda as well as the attendees are shown below. The purpose of the meeting was to clarify

points in the Tier 3 rule and to review Ford’s public comments.

Attendees:

Glen Passavant EPA

Dominic DiCicco Ford

Cynthia Williams Ford

Jeff Glodich Ford

Dan Adsit Ford

Michael Olechiw EPA

Johanna Dolch Ford

Don Kopinski EPA

Tad Wysor EPA

Will Ruona Ford

Tony Fernandez EPA

Agenda

E1x FE

• E1x equation timing

• Phase-in/carry-over for FE (clarification)

4WD Dynamometers

• 4WD confirmations (timing, scope, purpose)

• Equivalency requirement (Part 1066, 22MY)
Particulate Matter

• US06 20 mg/mi std for vehicles >6k 

• HDV interim in-use

HDVs

• Altitude / interim in-use

SFTP

• E85 testing requirement (vs. attestation)

• Enrichment limits (clarification)

Certification Fuel

• Priority: 9RVP

• Optional Alternative Cert Fuels 

Market Fuel

• Sulfur

• Sulfur Purge Cycle

• PM impact: sulfur, T90, aromatics (“PM Index”)

• 1 psi Waiver

• Octane Rating

• LAC Detergency

• Metal Additives (Mn)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of Directors 

BSB Bancorp, Inc. 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration statements: 

 

File No. 33-92138 on Form S-8, 

File No. 33-24714 on Form S-8, 

File No. 33-78442 on Form S-8, and 

File No. 333-42950 on Form S-8 

 

of BSB Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2004, relating to the consolidatedstatements of condition of BSB Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears inthe December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSB Bancorp, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Albany, New York 

February 23, 2004
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-12-00406-CR &

04-12-00410-CR

Noah Alemu ABERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. A11374 & A11188

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 26, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on May 17, 2012, and therefore, appellant’s motion for 

new trial was due June 18, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). However, appellant did not file a

motion for new trial until June 29, 2012. Because appellant did not timely file a motion for new 

trial, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore June 18, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until June 29, 2012, and appellant did not file a 

timely motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
04-12-00406-CR & 04-12-00410-CR

- 2 -

On August 8, 2012, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s response was due in this court on or before 

September 7, 2012. We advised appellant that if a timely, satisfactory response was not filed, the 

appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response. 

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to 

entertain the appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also 

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-oftime appeals from felony convictions). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish
#### § 10.3 Policy.

It is the policy of the Department of Transportation to comply with the letter and the spirit of the Privacy Act (the Act). Therefore, personal data contained in each system of records is afforded adequate protection against unauthorized access, is as accurate as is feasible, and is limited to that necessary to accomplish the stated use or uses of the system. Further, no system of records is exempted from the requirements of the Act unless it is determined that to do so is in the best interest of the government with due concern for individual rights.
§ 71.01-15 Temporary certificate. ( a ) If necessary to prevent delay of the vessel, a temporary certificate of inspection, Form CG-854, shall be issued pending the issuance and delivery of the regular certificate of inspection. Such temporary certificate shall be carried in the same manner as the regular certificate and shall in all ways be considered the same as the regular certificate of inspection which it represents.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 15.7 Covered persons. Persons subject to the requirements of part 15 are: ( a ) Each airport operator and aircraft operator subject to the requirements of Subchapter C of this title.
( b ) Each indirect air carrier, as defined in 49 CFR 1540.5.
( c ) Each owner, charterer, or operator of a vessel, including foreign vessel owners, charterers, and operators, required to have a security plan under Federal or International law.
( d ) Each owner or operator of a maritime facility required to have a security plan under the Maritime Transportation Security Act, (Pub. L. 107-295), 46 U.S.C. 70101 *et seq.,* 33 CFR part 6, or 33 U.S.C. 1221 *et seq.*
( e ) Each person performing the function of a computer reservation system or global distribution system for airline passenger information.
( f ) Each person participating in a national or area security committee established under 46 U.S.C. 70112, or a port security committee.
( g ) Each industry trade association that represents covered persons and has entered into a non-disclosure agreement with the DHS or DOT.
( h ) DHS and DOT.
( i ) Each person conducting research and development activities that relate to aviation or maritime transportation security and are approved, accepted, funded, recommended, or directed by DHS or DOT.
( j ) Each person who has access to SSI, as specified in § 15.11.
( k ) Each person employed by, contracted to, or acting for a covered person, including a grantee of DHS or DOT, and including a person formerly in such position.
( l ) Each person for which a vulnerability assessment has been directed, created, held, funded, or approved by the DOT, DHS, or that has prepared a vulnerability assessment that will be provided to DOT or DHS in support of a Federal security program.
( m ) Each person receiving SSI under § 1520.15(d) or (e).
Presidential Documents

40059 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 139 

Friday, July 20, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of July 19, 2007 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Former Liberian Regime of Charles Taylor 

On July 22, 2004, by Executive Order 13348, I declared a national emergency 

and ordered related measures, including the blocking of property of certain 

persons associated with the former Liberian regime of Charles Taylor, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701– 

1706). I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and 

policies of former Liberian President Charles Taylor and other persons, 

in particular, their unlawful depletion of Liberian resources and their removal 

from Liberia and secreting of Liberian funds and property, which have 

undermined Liberia’s transition to democracy and the orderly development 

of its political, administrative, and economic institutions and resources. 

I further noted that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed on August 

18, 2003, and the related cease-fire had not yet been universally implemented 

throughout Liberia, and that the illicit trade in round logs and timber products 

was linked to the proliferation of and trafficking in illegal arms, which 

perpetuated the Liberian conflict and fueled and exacerbated other conflicts 

throughout West Africa. 

Today, Liberia is engaged in a peaceful transition to a democratic order 

under the administration of President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 13348, clarify that the subject of this national 

emergency has been and remains limited to the former Liberian regime 

of Charles Taylor and specified other persons and not the country, citizens, 

Government, or Central Bank of Liberia. 

Charles Taylor is today standing trial in The Hague by the Special Court 

for Sierra Leone. However, stability in Liberia is still fragile. The actions 

and policies of Charles Taylor and others have left a legacy of destruction 

that still has the potential to undermine Liberia’s transformation and recovery. 

Because the actions and policies of these persons continue to pose an 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States, 

the national emergency declared on July 22, 2004, and the measures adopted 

on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond 

July 22, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergency Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 13348. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRO0
40060 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

July 19, 2007. [FR Doc. 07–3595 

Filed 7–19–07; 11:11 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRO0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>