alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 176.340 Combustible liquids in portable tanks. Combustible liquids, having a flash point of 38 °C (100 °F) or higher, may be transported by vessel only in one of the portable tanks as specified below: ( a ) Specification portable tanks authorized in § 173.241 of this subchapter.
( b ) In nonspecification portable tanks, subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) Each portable tank must conform to a DOT specification 57 portable tank, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph;
( 2 ) The rated capacity of the tank may not exceed 4,542 L (1,200 gallons), and the rated gross weight may not exceed 13,608 kg (30,000 pounds);
( 3 ) The vibration test need not be performed;
( 4 ) When the total surface area of the tank exceeds 14.9 square meters (160 square feet), the total emergency venting capacity must be determined in accordance with table I in § 178.345-10 of this subchapter;
( 5 ) ln place of a specification identification marking, the tank must be marked, on two sides in letters at least 5 cm (2 inches) high on contrasting background: “FOR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS ONLY” and “49 CFR 176.340”. This latter marking constitutes certification by the person offering the combustible liquid materials for transportation that the portable tank conforms to this paragraph;
( 6 ) Each tank must be made of steel;
( 7 ) The design pressure of the tank must be not less than 62 kPa (9 psig);
( 8 ) No pressure relief device may open at less than 34.4 kPa (5 psig);
( 9 ) Each tank must be retested and marked at least once every 2 years in accordance with the requirements applicable to a DOT specification 57 portable tank in § 180.605 of this subchapter; and
( 10 ) Each tank must conform to the provisions of § 173.24 of this subchapter and § 180.605(b) and (j) of this subchapter.
( c ) Portable tanks approved by the Commandant (G-MSO), USCG.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52705, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 176-41, 61 FR 51339, Oct. 1, 1996; 62 FR 51561, Oct. 1, 1997; 66 FR 45185, 45384, Aug. 28, 2001; 67 FR 61015, Sept. 27, 2002; 68 FR 57633, Oct. 6, 2003]
§ 1312.8 Identification of tariff publication. ( a ) Every tariff publication filed with the Board shall include: ( 1 ) The STB tariff designation;
( 2 ) The name of the issuing carrier or agent;
( 3 ) The name of the tariff; and
( 4 ) The issue and effective dates of the publication.
( b ) If the publication contains matter effective on other than the general effective date, the notation (Except as Noted) shall be included with the general effective date.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Wilbur2187@aol.com [mailto:Wilbur2187@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ryan Berbick 

2647 Glen Cotswold Ct. 

San Jose, CA 95148
98-2053.

#### Henry Meyer Assoc., Inc. v. Moreland Hills.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72754. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1468, 704 N.E.2d 577. On motion for *1506reconsideration. Motion granted; *sua sponte,*the discretionary appeal is allowed, and the cause is consolidated with 98-2054, *infra.*

Cook, J., dissents.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11096

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JIGNESHKUMAR RAMANBAHAI PATEL, 

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent.

____________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A093-461-235

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-11096 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11096

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jigneshkumar Ramanbahai Patel, a native and citizen of India present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, 

was convicted under Georgia’s RICO statute of offering multiple 

bootleg DVDs for sale in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-8-60. Following his conviction, the Department of Homeland Security initiated 

removal proceedings against Patel, alleging that he was subject to 

removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), which renders inadmissible any alien convicted of “a crime involving moral turpitude”

(CIMT). An immigration judge denied Patel’s application for cancellation of removal, reasoning that he committed a CIMT because 

his offense required knowingly selling illicit copyrighted material. 

The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the IJ’s decision. Before us, Patel contends that his conviction lacked the level of scienter required for a CIMT.1 

“Whether a crime involves the depravity or fraud necessary 

to be one of moral turpitude depends upon the inherent nature of 

the offense, as defined in the relevant statute, rather than the circumstances surrounding a defendant’s particular conduct.” Itani v. 

Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1213, 1215–16 (11th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). 

“Generally, a crime involving dishonesty or false statement is 

1 Whether a conviction constitutes a CIMT is a legal question that we review 

de novo. Gelin v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 837 F.3d 1236, 1240 (11th Cir. 2016). 

USCA11 Case: 21-11096 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 2 of 3
21-11096 Opinion of the Court 3

considered to be one involving moral turpitude.” Id. at 1215 (quotation omitted). “If a conviction requires that a defendant acted 

knowingly or intentionally, the statute requires a sufficiently culpable mental state to constitute a CIMT.” Pierre v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 

879 F.3d 1241, 1251 (11th Cir. 2018) (quotation marks omitted). 

The specific Georgia provision that Patel violated makes it 

unlawful for a person to “knowingly . . . offer for sale . . . any article 

or device on which sounds or visual images have been transferred, 

knowing it to have been made without the consent of the person 

who owns the master . . . device or article from which the sounds 

or visual images are derived.” O.C.G.A. § 16-8-60(a)(2) (emphases 

added). Because this crime involves dishonesty and requires that 

the offender act knowingly, it qualifies as a CIMT. Accordingly, 

the BIA didn’t err in determining that Patel had been convicted of 

a CIMT and upholding the denial of his application for cancellation 

of removal.

PETITION DENIED.

USCA11 Case: 21-11096 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 3 of 3
#### § 179.221 Individual specification requirements applicable to tank car tanks consisting of an inner container supported within an outer shell.
#### Jacob Stroher, *Respondent, v.*Philip B. Elting, *Appellant*.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending June 1, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 18, 1995 (96), Para 96.31 Senate Bill Referred]
[Page 1151]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.96.31  senate bill referred

  A bill of the Senate of the following title was taken from the 
Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S. 457. An Act to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act 
     to update references in the classification of children for 
     purposes of United States immigration laws; to the Committee 
     on the Judiciary.
```
§ 1018.20 Written demand for payment. ( a ) The Board shall make appropriate written demand upon the debtor for payment of money in terms which specify: ( 1 ) The basis for the indebtedness and the right of the debtor to request review within the Board;
( 2 ) The amount claimed;
( 3 ) The date by which payment is to be made, which normally should not be more than 30 days from the date that the initial demand letter statement was mailed, unless otherwise specified by contractual agreement, established by Federal statute or regulation, or agreed to under a payment agreement;
( 4 ) The applicable standards for assessing interest, penalties, and administrative costs (31 CFR 901.9 and 49 CFR 1018.30); and
( 5 ) The applicable policy for reporting the delinquent debt to consumer reporting agencies.
( b ) The Board normally shall send three progressively stronger written demands at not more than 30-day intervals, unless circumstances indicate that alternative remedies better protect the Government's interest, that the debtor has explicitly refused to pay, or that sending a further demand is futile. Depending upon the circumstances of the particular case, the second and third demands may: ( 1 ) Offer or seek to confer with the debtor;
( 2 ) State the amount of the interest and penalties that will be added on a daily basis, as well as the administrative costs that will be added to the debt until the debt is paid; and
( 3 ) State that the authorized collection procedures include any procedure authorized in this part including: ( i ) Contacts with the debtor's employer when the debtor is employed by the Federal Government or is a member of the military establishment or the Coast Guard;
( ii ) Possible referral of the debt to a private agency for collection;
( iii ) Possible reporting of the delinquent debt to consumer reporting agencies in accordance with the guidelines and standards contained in 31 CFR 901.4 and the Board's procedures set forth in § 1018.23 of this part;
( iv ) The suspension or revocation of a license or other remedy under § 1018.25 of this part;
( v ) Installment payments possibly requiring security; and
( vi ) The right to refer claims to GAO or DOJ for litigation.
( c ) The failure to state in a letter of demand a matter described in § 1018.20 is not a defense for a debtor and does not prevent the Board from proceeding with respect to that matter.
[58 FR 7749, Feb. 9, 1993; 58 FR 11099, Feb. 23, 1993, as amended at 81 FR 8851, Feb. 23, 2016]
##### 



COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC.
SMARTINVESTOR RETIREMENT BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005
 ARTICLE I  Purpose and Adoption of Plan
 Adoption:
 Purpose:
 Purpose of the 2005 Amendment and Restatement:
 ARTICLE II  Definitions




---



##### 



paid in cash.




---



##### 



Year
      st
    ARTICLE III  Administration of Plan
 its




---



##### 








---



##### 



days




---



##### 



copies of
   ARTICLE IV  Arbitration




---



##### 



fees
 a is




---



##### 



ARTICLE V  Eligibility
 for in
  The Account of such
 ARTICLE VI  Employer Contributions
     ARTICLE VII  Investment of Accounts
 day of each




---



##### 



ARTICLE VIII  Distribution of Accounts




---



##### 



five (5) years
 form with




---



##### 



the of
 ARTICLE IX  Covenant Not to Compete, Non-Solicitation,  Non-Disclosure and Forfeiture




---



##### 



in
     may




---



##### 



receive
      ARTICLE X  Nature of Employer Obligation and Participant Interest
 her




---



##### 



ARTICLE XI  Miscellaneous Provisions




---



##### 



other
  18th December ,
 ATTEST:
    
    
    
    COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Joseph B. Cartee
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Garrett R. HegelIts:
    
    Associate General Counsel
    
    
    
    
    
    Its:
    
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit A




---



##### 



Exhibit B   SmartInvestor Retirement Restoration Plan
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/       Clinton H. HowardClinton H. HowardChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 18, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 8, 2010



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce               
|Alan M. Pearce                   
|Chief Financial Officer, Director

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.251 Bulk packaging for ammonium nitrate emulsion, suspension, or gel. When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a hazardous material be packaged under this section, only the following bulk packagings are authorized, subject to the requirements of subparts A and B of part 173 of this subchapter and the special provisions specified in column 7 of the § 172.101 table. ( a ) *IBCs.* IBCs are authorized subject to the conditions and limitations of this section provided: ( 1 ) The IBC type is authorized according to the IBC packaging code for the specific hazardous material in Column (7) of the § 172.101 Table;
( 2 ) The IBC conforms to the requirements in subpart O of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group performance level in Column (5) of the § 172.101 Table for the material being transported.
( b ) *Portable tanks.* This section does not apply to “UN3375, Ammonium nitrate emulsion” when transported in IM 101 or 102 portable tanks in accordance with IME Standard 23 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
[80 FR 1161, Jan. 8, 2015, as amended at 89 FR 15665, Mar. 4, 2024]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00142-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24-0153-431

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wallach, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

NANDINI DEVI AND GREGORY GINN, Appellants

V.

ZVETATWO, LLC AND SPARSHTWO, LTD., Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant Nandini Devi’s Unopposed Voluntary Motion 

to Dismiss Appeal” and “Appellant Gregory Ginn’s Unopposed Voluntary Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal.” We grant both of the motions and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). 

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: July 25, 2024
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RAW DATA QUALIFIER REPORT Sep. 4, 2015 Report Request ID: 1366985 Report Code: AMP360

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:JWV State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 077

099 047 039 019 031 107 029 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration CRITERIA 88101 AGENCY SELECTIONS California Air Resources Board San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District SELECTED OPTIONS QUALIFIER COUNTS BY MONITOR MERGE PDF FILES QUALIFIER CODE CONCURRENCE STATUS QUALIFIER TYPES AGENCY ROLE Option Type Option Value YES YES RJ - High Winds (REQEXC) All Data (Concurred and Non-concurred)

ALL QUALFIER TYPES

PQAO DATE CRITERIA 2010 Start Date End Date 2014 01 01 12 31 Tribal CodeUnited States Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality System Raw Data Qualifier Report (v 1.1) Sep. 4, 2015 Report Date:

Page 1 of 2 PM2.5 - Local Conditions Parameter: 88101

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) Standard Units: 105 06-029-0014-88101-1 06-029-0014-88101-1 06-029-0016-88101-1 06-029-0016-88101-1 Monitor Key / Monitor Key / 5558 CALIFORNIA AVE, BAKERSFIELD 5558 CALIFORNIA AVE, BAKERSFIELD 410 E. PLANZ RD. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 410 E. PLANZ RD. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Site Address Site Address 2014-06-10 00:00 2014-06-11 00:00 2010-04-11 00:00 2013-05-05 00:00 Sample Date-Time Sample Date-Time 79.9 74 107.8 167.3 Sample Value Sample Value RJ

RJ RJ RJ Code CodeHigh Winds High Winds High Winds High Winds Description Description High winds. High winds. High winds caused blowing dust and elevated PM concentrations. Event: Event:
Event: 2015-06-29 2015-06-29 2014-06-19 Action Date Action Date High winds. High winds. High winds caused blowing dust and elevated PM concentrations. 

### Comment/URL: Comment/URL: Comment/URL: NAAQS Standard NAAQS Standard Ind IndDate
Date Qualifier Qualifier 2015-06-29 2015-06-29 2011-06-13 2014-06-19 Monitor Qualifier Counts:
Monitor Qualifier Counts: Concurrence
Concurrence ( (

) )
RJ

RJ High Winds
High Winds Count:

Count: 2

2United Stated Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality System Sep. 4, 2015 Report Date:

Page 2 of 2 All Qualifiers Utilized: Qualifier Code: Qualifier Description: Qualifier Count: RJ High Winds 4
§ 1572.107 Other analyses. ( a ) TSA may determine that an applicant poses a security threat based on a search of the following databases: ( 1 ) Interpol and other international databases, as appropriate.
( 2 ) Terrorist watchlists and related databases.
( 3 ) Any other databases relevant to determining whether an applicant poses, or is suspected of posing, a security threat, or that confirm an applicant's identity.
( b ) TSA may also determine that an applicant poses a security threat, if the search conducted under this part reveals extensive foreign or domestic criminal convictions, a conviction for a serious crime not listed in 49 CFR 1572.103, or a period of foreign or domestic imprisonment that exceeds 365 consecutive days.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 17, 1995 (95), Para 95.15 H. Res. 189--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1137]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.95.15  h. res. 189--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, pursuant to clause 5, rule 
I, announced the unfinished business to be the question on agreeing to 
the resolution (H. Res. 189) providing for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1977) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1996, and for other purposes; as amended.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, announced that the yeas 
had it.
  So the resolution, as amended, was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution, as amended, 
was agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
§ 178.33a-5 Material. ( a ) Uniform quality steel plate such as black plate, electrotin plate, hot dipped tinplate, ternplate or other commercially accepted can making plate; or nonferrous metal of uniform drawing quality.
( b ) Material with seams, cracks, laminations or other injurious defects not authorized.
[Order 71, 31 FR 9074, July 1, 1966. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967]
#### Lucien Birdseye, *Respondent, v.*Charles W. Goddard, *Appel*lant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
§ 179.100-4 Insulation. ( a ) If insulation is applied, the tank shell and manway nozzle must be insulated with an approved material. The entire insulation must be covered with a metal jacket of a thickness not less than 11 gauge (0.1196 inch) nominal (Manufacturers' Standard Gauge) and flashed around all openings so as to be weather-tight. The exterior surface of a carbon steel tank, and the inside surface of a carbon steel jacket must be given a protective coating.
( b ) If insulation is a specification requirement, it shall be of sufficient thickness so that the thermal conductance at 60 °F is not more than 0.075 Btu per hour, per square foot, per degree F temperature differential. If exterior heaters are attached to tank, the thickness of the insulation over each heater element may be reduced to one-half that required for the shell.
[29 FR 18995, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21344, Nov. 6, 1971; Amdt. 179-50, 60 FR 49077, Sept. 21, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.475 Quality control requirements prior to each shipment of Class 7 (radioactive) materials. Before each shipment of any Class 7 (radioactive) materials package, the offeror must ensure, by examination or appropriate tests, that— ( a ) The packaging is proper for the contents to be shipped;
( b ) The packaging is in unimpaired physical condition, except for superficial marks;
( c ) Each closure device of the packaging, including any required gasket, is properly installed, secured, and free of defects;
( d ) For fissile material, each moderator and neutron absorber, if required, is present and in proper condition;
( e ) Each special instruction for filling, closing, and preparation of the packaging for shipment has been followed;
( f ) Each closure, valve, or other opening of the containment system through which the radioactive content might escape is properly closed and sealed;
( g ) Each packaging containing liquid in excess of an A2 quantity and intended for air shipment has been tested to show that it will not leak under an ambient atmospheric pressure of not more than 25 kPa, absolute (3.6 psia). The test must be conducted on the entire containment system, or on any receptacle or vessel within the containment system, to determine compliance with this requirement;
( h ) The internal pressure of the containment system will not exceed the design pressure during transportation; and
( i ) External radiation and contamination levels are within the allowable limits specified in this subchapter.