alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: pennball@swva.net [mailto:pennball@swva.net] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:28 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

George Ball 

2364 Kyle Weeks Rd 

Willis, Va 24380 

Sincerely, 

George Ball 

2364 Kyle Weeks Road 

Willis, VA 24380
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |  |
| If to the Agent:                                      | ING Capital LLC1325 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY  10019Attention:  Daniel W. LamprechtManaging DirectorFacsimile No.: 646-424-6390Telephone No.: 646-424-6871 |
| with a copy to(which shall not constitute notice):    | King & Spalding LLP1180 Peachtree Street, NEAtlanta, GA  30309Attention:  Hector E. Llorens, Jr., Esq.Facsimile No.:  404-572-5128Telephone No.  404-572-3523 |
| If to the Borrower or the Parent Guarantor:           | PICO Northstar Hallock, LLCPICO Northstar, LLC15 Broadway, Suite 600Fargo, North Dakota 58102Attention:  Neil Juhnke                  PresidentFacsimile No.: 701-866-9059Telephone No.  701-478-5848 |
| with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):                  | PICO Holdings, Inc.7979 Ivanhoe Ave.La Jolla, CA  92037Attention:  John Hart                  Chief Executive OfficerFacsimile No.: 858-456-6480Telephone No.  858-456-6022 |
| with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):                  | DLA Piper LLP (US)4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100San Diego, CA  92121037Attention:  Marty Lorenzo, Esq.Facsimile No.: 858-638-5030Telephone No.  858-677-1430 |

----

----

----
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 27, 1995 (103), Para 103.10 VA--HUD Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Page 1207]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.103.10  va--hud appropriations, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. NUSSLE, pursuant to House Resolution 201 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 2099) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. NUSSLE, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. COMBEST as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some 
time spent therein,
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal Nos. 07-47] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 07-47 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and sensitivity of technology. 

Dated: August 8, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

      ( print page 45792)          ( print page 45793)          ( print page 45794)          ( print page 45795)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M 

[FR Doc. 07-3986  Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am] 

                BILLING CODE 5001-06-C                       ( print page 45796)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,333,331
<SECURITIES>                                   000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                   000
<INVENTORY>                                    000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,270,597
<PP&E>                                         000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,606,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,654,999
<BONDS>                                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          000
<PREFERRED>                                    000
<COMMON>                                       000
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,951,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,606,154
<SALES>                                        000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,788,499
<CGS>                                          000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,621,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,166,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                   000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,166,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                 000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                000
<CHANGES>                                      000
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,166,561
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .26


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 192

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

#### § 192.1005 What must a gas distribution operator (other than a small LPG operator) do to implement this subpart?

No later than August 2, 2011 a gas distribution operator must develop and implement an integrity management program that includes a written integrity management plan as specified in § 192.1007.

[74 FR 63934, Dec. 4, 2009, as amended at 86 FR 2241, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### § 1.20 Secretary of Transportation.

The Secretary is the head of the Department. The Secretary exercises oversight of all of the OST components, as well as each of the Operating Administrations, and overall planning, direction, and control of the Department's agenda.
#### Green Caudle v. The State.

*No. 1025.*

*Decided December 12.*

Assault with Intent to Rape—Evidence of Prosecutrix as to Particulars Inadmissible.—On a trial for assault with intent to rape, while the recent complaint, state, and appearance, marks of violence, and condition of the dress of the prosecntrix shortly after the alleged injury are admissible as original evidence, the statement of the particulars and details made by her of the injury, when not res gestae, are not original evidence, and it is error to admit them as such. Following Pefferling v. The State, 40 Texas, 487.

Appeal from the District Court of Erath. Tried below before Hon. J. B. Straughan.

This appeal is from a conviction for assault with intent to rape, the punishment being assessed at two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary.

*27It is unnecessary to state the case in detail, in view of its disposition by the opinion.

*Martin &*George, for appellant.

*R. L. Henry,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSOK, Judge.

Appellant was indicted and convicted of assault with intent to rape Ora Kerr, a girl under 12 years of age.

The State was permitted to prove, over the objection of defendant, by James Kerr, the father of the assaulted girl, that shortly after the alleged injury she told him, “that a man had caught her around the

neck and said to her, ‘I want to-you’ [using a term which meant

to have intercourse with her], and that she hallooed, and the man let her go, and she then came home.”

These are practically all the details of the assault, as shown by her testimony in the statement of facts. It was held in Pefferling’s case, 40 Texas, 487, that while recent complaint by the person injured, her state and appearance, marks of violence, and condition of her dress, shortly after the alleged injury, may be proven as original evidence, the particulars of the complaint, the details of the alleged injury, can not be admitted as original evidence; they are only admissible for the purpose, in rebuttal, of supporting the veracity of the prosecuting witness. Such has been the law ever since. The testimony was not admissible as res gestes. The girl had, when first reaching home, complained and told her father of the circumstance of the assault; the father had gone over to a neighbor’s, and returning in about three-quarters of an hour, was told by his daughter the details of the assault, as above set out. The girl had remained at the house, and had been talking to her mother and several other persons.

The admission of this testimony was error, was excepted to at the time, and works a reversal of the judgment of conviction. The other questions need not be passed upon; they will not likely arise again.

For the error pointed out, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
258 P.2d 360

#### STATE v. LAWLER.

No. 7907.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 10, 1953.

McFadden & McFadden, Plummer, for appellant.

THOMAS, Justice.

The information charges that on or about the 29th day of July, 1951, appellant sold beer to divers persons, to-wit, Lyle Amos, a minor.

Upon the trial, appellant was convicted of the misdemeanor of selling beer to minors in violation of Sec. 23-1013(1), I.C. From this judgment of conviction appellant, on appeal, urges numerous assignments of error including the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a judgment of conviction.

Without detailing the limited evidence introduced at the trial suffice to state that no witness testified that on the 29th day of July, 1951, appellant sold beer to Lyle Amos or to any other minor; the deputy *sheriff*testified in substance that he visited the place of business of appellant on July 27, 1951 (this was two days prior to the date the sale was allegedly made) but that he did not see anybody buy beer at the place at that time but he did see Lyle Amos, Gene Bergman and Paul Boudreau, all minors, with beer; Lyle Amos did not testify at the trial; both Gene Bergman and Paul Boudreau testified that each drank beer at the place of business of appellant on the date charged in the information, and both testified they had purchased beer at the place but did not fix the date as to when either of them had purchased beer at appellant’s place of business. This constituted all the evidence introduced on behalf of the State and it will be noted there is absolutely no testimony by any of the witnesses that appellant ever sold beer to Lyle Amos, or that she sold beer to either of the other two minor boys on July 29, 1951, the date charged in the information.

*115In order to sustain a judgment of conviction of a sale of beer to minors there must be evidence of a transaction which amounts in law to a sale. 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 349(a), 349(c)(1), pages 507, 508.

There being a total failure of proof of sale of beer to Lyle Amos on July 29, 1951, it follows that the judgment of conviction should be and the same is hereby reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment of dismissal and exonerate the bail bond of appellant

PORTER, C. J., and GIVENS and TAYLOR, JJ., and McQUADE, D. J., concur.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JOHN COWART

NO. 2022 KW 0811

AUGUST 1, 2022

In Re: John Cowart, applying for supervisory writs, 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 

37184. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

VGW

EW

Guidry, J., concurs and would deny the writ application on

the showing made. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

14r U Y CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
-----Original Message----- 

From: dharrisjohnson@aol.com [mailto:dharrisjohnson@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Johnson 

6316 Ridge Rock Lane 

Knoxville, TN 37909
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                1,052,583
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           756,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             223,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      2,141,713
<PP&E>                                                2,383,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                          629,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        4,178,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   357,332
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                              3,608,118
<OTHER-SE>                                             (644,616)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          4,178,163
<SALES>                                                 724,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        724,127
<CGS>                                                    61,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            61,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        540,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        122,929
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      (15,661)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         121,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                             37,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             84,089
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.02



</TABLE>
§ 172.411 EXPLOSIVE 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 labels, and EXPLOSIVE Subsidiary label. ( a ) Except for size and color, the EXPLOSIVE 1.1, EXPLOSIVE 1.2 and EXPLOSIVE 1.3 labels must be as follows:
( b ) In addition to complying with § 172.407, the background color on the EXPLOSIVE 1.1, EXPLOSIVE 1.2 and EXPLOSIVE 1.3 labels must be orange. The “**” must be replaced with the appropriate division number and compatibility group letter. The compatibility group letter must be the same size as the division number and must be shown as a capitalized Roman letter.
( c ) Except for size and color, the EXPLOSIVE 1.4, EXPLOSIVE 1.5 and EXPLOSIVE 1.6 labels must be as follows: EXPLOSIVE 1.4:
EXPLOSIVE 1.5:
EXPLOSIVE 1.6:
( d ) In addition to complying with § 172.407, the background color on the EXPLOSIVE 1.4, EXPLOSIVE 1.5 and EXPLOSIVE 1.6 label must be orange. The “*” must be replaced with the appropriate compatibility group. The compatibility group letter must be shown as a capitalized Roman letter. Division numbers must measure at least 30 mm (1.2 inches) in height and at least 5 mm (0.2 inches) in width.
( e ) An EXPLOSIVE subsidiary label is required for materials identified in Column (6) of the HMT as having an explosive subsidiary hazard. The division number or compability group letter may be displayed on the subsidiary hazard label. Except for size and color, the EXPLOSIVE subsidiary label must be as follows:
( f ) The EXPLOSIVE subsidiary label must comply with § 172.407.
[Amdt. 172-123, 56 FR 66256, Dec. 20, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 172-139, 59 FR 67490, Dec. 29, 1994; 66 FR 33425, June 21, 2001; 68 FR 45031, July 31, 2003]
#### § 1.71 Key responsibilities.

The Inspector General conducts, supervises, and coordinates audits and investigations; reviews existing and proposed legislation and makes recommendations to the Secretary and Congress concerning their effect on the economy and efficiency of program administration, or the prevention and detection of fraud and abuse; recommends policies for and conducts, supervises, or coordinates other activities of the Department for the purpose of promoting economy and efficiency in program administration, or preventing and detecting fraud and abuse; and keeps the Secretary and the Congress fully and currently informed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****NASA aerospace flight batteryprogram [electronic resource] generic safety, handling and qualificationguidelines for lithium-ion (Li-Ion) batteries ; availability of sourcematerials for lithium-ion (Li-Ion) batteries ; maintaining technicalcommunications related to aerospace batteries (NASA Aerospace Battery Workshop)[electronic resource].**
pt1|pt2|
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.15:2010-216727

Item Number: 0830-D (online)

CGP systemNumber:000753144
November 2, 2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# Date and Time:

Thursday, August 2, 2007; 6 p.m. 

# Place:

Via Teleconference; Public Call In Number: 1-800-597-7623. 

## Meeting Agenda 

I. Approval of Agenda. 

II. Approval of Minutes of July 13, Meeting. 

III. Program Planning. 
      - FY 2007 Statutory Report.

IV. Future Agenda Items. 

V. Adjourn. 

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Manuel Alba, Press and Communications, (202) 376-8582. 

Dated: July 24, 2007. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-3690 Filed 7-24-07; 4:42 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, July 28, 1995 (104), Para 104.4 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1214]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.104.4  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed a bill of the following title, in 
which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 641. An Act to reauthorize the Ryan White CARE Act of 
     1990, and for other purposes.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 26, 1995 (102), Para 102.43 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1205]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.102.43  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 359: Mr. Weldon of Florida.
       H.R. 1444: Mr. Torres.
       H. Con. Res. 85: Mrs. Thurman.
```
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Real Estate Associates Limited V (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.