alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending September 7, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 172.323 Infectious substances. ( a ) In addition to other requirements of this subpart, a bulk packaging containing a regulated medical waste, as defined in § 173.134(a)(5) of this subchapter, must be marked with a BIOHAZARD marking conforming to 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)— ( 1 ) On two opposing sides or two ends other than the bottom if the packaging has a capacity of less than 3,785 L (1,000 gallons). The BIOHAZARD marking must measure at least 152.4 mm (6 inches) on each side and must be visible from the direction it faces.
( 2 ) On each end and each side if the packaging has a capacity of 3,785 L (1,000 gallons) or more. The BIOHAZARD marking must measure at least 152.4 mm (6 inches) on each side and must be visible from the direction it faces.
( b ) For a bulk packaging contained in or on a transport vehicle or freight container, if the BIOHAZARD marking on the bulk packaging is not visible, the transport vehicle or freight container must be marked as required by paragraph (a) of this section on each side and each end.
( c ) The background color for the BIOHAZARD marking required by paragraph (a) of this section must be orange and the symbol and letters must be black. Except for size the BIOHAZARD marking must appear as follows:
( d ) The BIOHAZARD marking required by paragraph (a) of this section must be displayed on a background of contrasting color. It may be displayed on a plain white square-on-point configuration having the same outside dimensions as a placard, as specified in § 172.519(c) of this part.
[67 FR 53135, Aug. 14, 2002, as amended at 76 FR 56314, Sept. 13, 2011]
#### Mark L. McDonald, Respondent, v. Edwin Davis, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
§ 179.24 Stamping. ( a ) ( 1 ) After July 25, 2012, to certify compliance with federal requirements, the tank manufacturer must install two identical permanent identification plates, one located on both inboard surfaces of the body bolsters of the tank car. One identification plate must be installed on the right side (AR) of the tank car, and the other must be installed on the back end left side (BL) body bolster webs so that each plate is readily accessible for inspection. The plates must be at least 3 ⁄ 32 inch thick and manufactured from corrosion resistant metal. When the tank jacket (flashing) covers the body bolster web and identification plates, additional identical plates must be installed on the AR and BL corners of the tank in a visible location. Tank cars built before July 25, 2012, may have the plate instead of or in addition to the stamping.
( 2 ) Each plate must be stamped, embossed, or otherwise marked by an equally durable method in letters 3/16 inch high with the following information (parenthetical abbreviations may be used, and the AAR form reference is to the applicable provisions of the AAR Specifications for Tank Cars (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter): ( i ) *Tank Manufacturer (Tank MFG):* Full name of the car builder as shown on the certificate of construction (AAR form 4-2).
( ii ) *Tank Manufacturer's Serial Number (SERIAL NO):* For the specific car.
( iii ) *AAR Number (AAR NO):* The AAR number from line 3 of AAR Form 4-2.
( iv ) *Tank Specification (SPECIFICATION):* The specification to which the tank was built from line 7 of AAR form 4-2.
( v ) *Tank Shell Material/Head Material (SHELL MATL/HEAD MATL):* ASTM or AAR specification of the material used in the construction of the tank shell and heads from lines 15 and 16 of AAR Form 4-2. For Class DOT-113W, DOT-115W, AAR-204W, and AAR-206W, the materials used in the construction of the outer tank shell and heads must be listed. Only list the alloy (e.g., 5154) for aluminum tanks and the type (e.g., 304L or 316L) for stainless steel tanks.
( vi ) *Insulation Material (INSULATION MATL):* Generic names of the first and second layer of any thermal protection/insulation material applied.
( vii ) *Insulation Thickness (INSULATION THICKNESS):* In inches.
( viii ) *Underframe/Stub Sill Type (UF/SS DESIGN):* The design from Line 32 of AAR Form 4-2.
( ix ) *Date of Manufacture (DATE OF MFR):* The month and year of tank manufacture. If the underframe has a different built date than the tank, show both dates.
( 3 ) When a modification to the tank changes any of the information shown in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the car owner or the tank car facility making the modification must install an additional variable identification plate on the tank in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section showing the following information: ( i ) *AAR Number (AAR NO):* The AAR number from line 3 of AAR Form 4-2 for the alteration or conversion.
( ii ) All items of paragraph (a)(2) of this section that were modified, followed by the month and year of modification.
( b ) [Reserved].
[77 FR 37985, June 25, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 35545, June 2, 2016]
§ 178.502 Identification codes for packagings. ( a ) Identification codes for designating kinds of packagings consist of the following: ( 1 ) A numeral indicating the kind of packaging, as follows: ( i ) “1” means a drum.
( ii ) “2” means a wooden barrel.
( iii ) “3” means a jerrican.
( iv ) “4” means a box.
( v ) “5” means a bag.
( vi ) “6” means a composite packaging.
( vii ) “7” means a pressure receptacle.
( 2 ) A capital letter indicating the material of construction, as follows: ( i ) “A” means steel (all types and surface treatments).
( ii ) “B” means aluminum.
( iii ) “C” means natural wood.
( iv ) “D” means plywood.
( v ) “F” means reconstituted wood.
( vi ) “G” means fiberboard.
( vii ) “H” means plastic.
( viii ) “L” means textile.
( ix ) “M” means paper, multi-wall.
( x ) “N” means metal (other than steel or aluminum).
( xi ) “P” means glass, porcelain or stoneware.
( 3 ) A numeral indicating the category of packaging within the kind to which the packaging belongs. For example, for steel drums (“1A”), “1” indicates a non-removable head drum ( *i.e.*, “1A1”) and “2” indicates a removable head drum (*i.e.*, “1A2”).
( b ) For composite packagings, two capital letters are used in sequence in the second position of the code, the first indicating the material of the inner receptacle and the second, that of the outer packaging. For example, a plastic receptacle in a steel drum is designated “6HA1”.
( c ) For combination packagings, only the code number for the outer packaging is used.
( d ) Identification codes are set forth in the standards for packagings in §§ 178.504 through 178.523 of this subpart.
Note to § 178.502 :
Plastics materials include other polymeric materials such as rubber.
[Amdt. 178-97, 55 FR 52717, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 178-106, 59 FR 67519, Dec. 29, 1994; 74 FR 2269, Jan. 14, 2009]
§ 178.346-5 Pressure and leakage tests. ( a ) Each cargo tank must be tested in accordance with § 178.345-13 and this section.
( b ) *Pressure test.* Test pressure must be as follows: ( 1 ) Using the hydrostatic test method, the test pressure must be the greater of 5.0 psig or 1.5 times the cargo tank MAWP.
( 2 ) Using the pneumatic test method, the test pressure must be the greater of 5.0 psig or 1.5 times the cargo tank MAWP, and the inspection pressure must be the cargo tank MAWP.
( c ) *Leakage test.* A cargo tank used to transport a petroleum distillate fuel that is equipped with vapor recovery equipment may be leakage tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63.425(e). To satisfy the leakage test requirements of this paragraph, the test specified in 40 CFR 63.425(e)(1) must be conducted using air. The hydrostatic test alternative permitted under Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60 (“Method 27—Determination of Vapor Tightness of Gasoline Delivery Tank Using Pressure-Vacuum Test”) may not be used to satisfy the leakage test requirements of this paragraph. A cargo tank tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63.425(e) may be marked as specified in § 180.415 of this subchapter.
[Amdt. 178-89, 54 FR 25029, June 12, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37064, Sept. 7, 1990; Amdt. 178-105, 59 FR 55176, Nov. 3, 1994. Redesignated by Amdt. 178-112, 61 FR 18934, Apr. 29, 1996; 68 FR 19285, Apr. 18, 2003]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.22 Memorials]
[Page 821]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.22  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII,

       101. The SPEAKER presented a memorial of the Senate of the 
     Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, relative to the 911th Airlift 
     Wing facility; to the Committee on National Security.
```
#### James H. Polley, Plaintiff, v. The City of Buffalo, Defendant.

A new trial denied and judgment ordered for the plaintiff on the verdict. t Opinion by

Corlett, J.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10122 Conference Calendar

__________________ RICARDO JERNIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus TDCJ, Medical Staff 80 John Wallace Unit Administrative Nursing Staff, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CV-184-C
- - - - - - - - - - (March 22, 1995) Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Jernigan appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Eighth Amendment's prohibition against "cruel and unusual punishment" protects Jernigan from improper medical care only if the care is "sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs." Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). Unsuccessful medical treatment, acts of negligence, neglect, or medical malpractice are insufficient to give rise toNo. 95-10122 -2-
a cause of action under § 1983. Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Nor is a prisoner's disagreement with his medical treatment sufficient to state a claim under § 1983. Id
. The district court properly characterized Jernigan's contentions as amounting to disagreement and dissatisfaction with his medical treatment and not deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. Under the facts alleged in his complaint, Jernigan has received continuous treatment for his injured knee from doctors and other members of the John Wallace medical staff. Deficiencies in that treatment, if any, certainly do not rise to the level of establishing deliberate indifference by prison officials. Jernigan himself refers in his brief to the defendants' "negligence." At its core, his claim is simply that he has not received the medical treatment he believes he was entitled to receive. Nothing in Jernigan's brief indicates that a hearing or a questionnaire would have developed a viable claim. Thus, the dismissal, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), on the basis of the facts contained in Jernigan's complaint did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). Jernigan's motions to supplement the record with medical records, grievance forms, sick requests, officers' statements, letters seeking assistance from sources outside of prison, and his original brief are DENIED. See United States v. Flores , 887 F.2d 543, 546 (5th Cir. 1989). AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Exploratory and Developmental Alcohol Research Center Review FRA 07-001.                    

*Date:*                         July 24-25, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIAAAA, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3037, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Inst. on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3037, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-3037,                         *katrina@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 28, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3298 Filed 7-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**MEMORANDUM TO RECORD** 

**SUBJECT:** Meeting with Robert Weaver on P roposed Revisions to the Water Quality

Standards Regulat ion
. **DATE :**  Tuesday , June 28, 2011 **T IME**  **:** 2:00 PM

– 3 :00 PM **Participants:**

 EPA HQ: Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan,  Robert (“Bob”) Weaver , Kelly & Weaver **Summary of d iscussion points**  **/requests for information from Bob Weaver**  **:**
 Request ed something in writing from the Agency that states that the length of a compliance schedule is not limited by the permit term o Shari Barash sent an email on 6/29/11 forwarding EPA’s CWA section 303(c) action letters on Indiana’s CSO Rule and referenced letter (Nov. 2006 letter to California State Water Resource Board)  Request ed a response on whether states can do something more stringent than federal regul ations for variances and compliance schedules. Shari Barash sent an email response on 7/12/11 stating: “Under CWA 510 a state may adopt or enforce "any

standard or limitation respecting discharges of pollutants" or "an y requirement respecting control or abatement of pollution" unless it is "less stringent" than a federal standard/limitation in effect under the CWA. Since variances are considered standards and the term "effluent limitation" includes "schedule of compliance," a state could adopt a more stringent variance or compliance schedule provision than allowed under federal minimum requirements (if their state law allows it). ”

 Requested that EPA consider including a link in the proposal to revise 40 CFR 131 to the water quality management planning sections in 40 CFR 130.

 Discussed his desire for “implementation schedules” for attaining the whole water quality standard (akin to the idea of “Restoration Standards” in the Florida Inland Waters Nutrient Proposed Rulemaking).

 Suggested that EPA survey the states on what they

are doing in their antidegradation policies and implementation procedures and place that information in the public record for the proposal rule.

 Requested a cop y of the “Variance Compendium”
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10(n)(2)

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
                  FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES
                (AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2003)

      BY THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE, the Banknorth Group, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors and Key Employees (amended and
restated effective January 1, 2003) (the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows,
with such amendment being effective as of January 1, 2005:

      1. Section 2.4 of the Plan is amended to restate Section 2.4 as Section
2.4(a) and to add Section 2.4(b) to read in its entirety as follows:

            (b) At the Committee's sole discretion, each Participant may elect
during the period set forth below to terminate his or her participation in the
Plan and, as a result of such termination, to receive a distribution of his or
her entire vested Account Balance in the Plan, provided that all amounts
distributed to a Participant as a result of the termination are included in the
Participant's income in calendar year 2005. As a condition to terminating
participation, a Participant shall timely complete, execute and return to the
Committee an election form, or such other form(s) as the Committee shall
determine, by the date selected by the Committee. The Participants shall be
given until the close of business on February 15, 2005 to make the
above-referenced election, unless the Committee elects to extend such date and
time in its sole discretion.

      2. Section 3.3(b) of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence at
the end of such section:

      Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, a deferral election may
not be made with respect to compensation to be earned on or after January 1,
2005, unless the Company subsequently amends this Plan to permit future
deferrals.

      3. Section 5.3 of the Plan is hereby deleted.

      4. All other provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and
effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 31st day of
January 2005.

ATTEST:                                    BANKNORTH GROUP, INC.


By: /s/ Janet E. McGorty                   By: /s/ Cynthia H. Hamilton
    -------------------------------------      ---------------------------------
Name:   Janet E. McGorty                   Name:   Cynthia H. Hamilton
Title:  Compensation Manager, SVP          Title:  Human Resources Director, EVP
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 7, 2013

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|OLIVER BANCORPORATION, INC. | CIC           | The James M. and Devon J. Goetz Family Trust Five, Mandan, North Dakota, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of Oliver Bancorporation, Inc., Center, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of Security First Bank of North Dakota, New Salem, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/13/2013
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | 12/13/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us