alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 28, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending August 21, 2010

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|EVOLVE BANK & TRUST | Member         | Evolve Bank & Trust, West Memphis, Arkansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2010 (October 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
a50736652ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT ONE TO THE



BE AEROSPACE, INC. 2010 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


(as amended effective September 11, 2013)







Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved under Section 10.2 of the BE Aerospace 2010 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), the B/E Aerospace, Inc. Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) hereby amends the Plan, effective as of the date hereof, as follows:







I.







The name of the Plan shall be the “B/E Aerospace, Inc. 2010 Deferred Compensation Plan”.







II.







Section 2.39 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence.







III.







Section 4.5 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 4.5:







“Vesting.  Participant Deferrals shall be 100% vested at all times to the extent the Compensation being deferred is vested pursuant to the terms of any agreement, plan or arrangement pursuant to which the Compensation was granted to the Participant.”







IV.







Pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Plan, the Committee has determined that “Deferrals of Compensation” in the form of restricted stock awards deferred as restricted stock units shall not be eligible for Company Contributions;







V.







Section 8.4 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph to the end thereof:







“Notwithstanding anything in this Section 8.4 to the contrary, a Participant may not change his or her investment allocation with respect to restricted stock units deferred under the Plan until six months following the date such restricted stock units vest.”







******


Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.  This Amendment One to the BE Aerospace Inc. 2010 Deferred Compensation Plan may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 




  





  











  








 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has adopted this Amendment One to the BE Aerospace, Inc. 2010 Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of the date set forth above.


 


 




	
 

	
/s/ Ryan M. Patch


	  	
Ryan M. Patch


	  	
Vice President – Law


	  	
General Counsel and Secretary


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Thomas P. McCaffrey


	  	
Thomas P. McCaffrey


	  	
Senior Vice President and


	  	
Chief Financial Officer


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Roger Franks


	  	
Roger Franks


	  	
Associate General Counsel -


	  	
Employee Relations/ Litigation


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Stephen Swisher


	  	
Stephen Swisher


	  	
Vice President – Finance and


	  	
Controller


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Eric J. Wesch


	  	
Eric J. Wesch


	  	
Vice President – Finance and Treasurer


	  	  
	  	  
	
 

	
/s/ Norris B. Powell


	  	
Norris B. Powell


	  	
Vice President – Human Resources











 


2
# EUR-Lex - 52001XX0308(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52001XX0308(01)

**Administrative Commission on social security for migrant workers **

*
Official Journal C 076 , 08/03/2001 P. 0004 - 0005 *

Administrative Commission on social security for migrant workers

(2001/C 76/03)

The annual average costs do not take into account the reduction of 20 % provided for in Articles 94(2) and 95(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72.

The net monthly average costs have been reduced by 20 %.

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND - 1997(1)

I. Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to the benefits in kind provided in 1997 to members of the family as referred to in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

>TABLE>

II. Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 1997 under Article 28 and 28(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

>TABLE>

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND - 1998(2)

I. Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 1998 to members of the family as referred to in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

>TABLE>

II. Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 1998 under Article 28 and 28(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

>TABLE>

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND - 1999

I. Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 1999 to members of the family as referred to in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

>TABLE>

II. Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 1999 under Article 28 and 28(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

>TABLE>

(1) Average costs: Spain, OJ C 228 of 11.8.1999.

Average costs: Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom, OJ C 27 of 29.1.2000.

Average costs: Germany, France and Austria, OJ C 207 of 20.7.2000.

(2) Average costs: Spain and Luxembourg, OJ C 27 of 29.1.2000.

Average costs: the Netherlands and Austria, OJ C 207 of 20.7.2000.
No. 99-30813 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30813 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MELINDA B. COLVILLE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-60012-1

-------------------- April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Melinda Colville (“Colville”) appeals the sentence following her guilty-plea conviction for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 & 2. She argues that the district court erred when it refused to depart downward from the guideline range, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13, because it mistakenly believed that it was without authority to do so. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record and concluded that the district court was aware that it possessed the authority to depart downward from the guidelineNo. 99-30813 -2- range pursuant to § 5K2.13. See United States v. Carmouche , 138 F.3d 1014, 1018 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Keller , 947 F.2d 739, 741 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         398,759
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          12,718
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               191,071
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,161,009
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         541,332
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      6,844,659
<ALLOWANCE>                                    107,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,919,528
<DEPOSITS>                                   8,114,757
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,645,610
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             96,455
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,142,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           68,775
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,066
<OTHER-SE>                                     849,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              13,919,528
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                579,196
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              328,737
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               907,935
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             252,195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             209,493
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          446,247
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   14,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 281
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                346,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                214,461
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     214,461
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,422
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.67
<LOANS-NON>                                     44,804
<LOANS-PAST>                                    10,484
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,084
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               110,561
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   23,909
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,119
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              107,871
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           107,871
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.4 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 888]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.4  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WICKER, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Friday, June 9, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Gerald S. Blaskie
                                    Chief Financial Officer of
                                    Superconductive Components, Inc.
                                    March 26, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending January 2, 2010

|Filer                                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Navarra | FBSEA          | Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Navarra, Pamplona (Navarra), Spain, to establish a representative office in Washington, D.C.                                                                                                                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                   | Not available 
|Federal Register:                            | Not applicable
|CITY HOLDING COMPANY                         | * 3A3          | City Holding Company, Charleston, West Virginia, to acquire up to 7.5% of the outstanding common stock of First United Corporation, Oakland, Maryland, and thereby indirectly acquire up to 7.5% of the shares of First United Bank & Trust Company, Oakland, Maryland. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/22/2010    
|Newspaper:                                   | Not available 
|Federal Register:                            | 01/22/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.16 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1027]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.16  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the foregoing amendment, as amended, submitted by Mr. 
FAZIO.

It was decided in the

Yeas

213

negative

Nays

214
```
98-2196.

#### State ex rel. Henry v. Fifth Appellate Judicial Court.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### John P. Price, Respondent, *v.*Ann Eliza Prick, *Appellant*.

Judgment modified by striking out “ and shall assume and be charged with the payment of the said, mortgage and all sums due and to grow due thereunder,” and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### Horace K. Thurber, *as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v.*Robert B. Minturn, *Respondent,*and The North River Bank, in the City of New York, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and judgment ordered as directed in opinion. Opinions by

Davis, P. J.,

Brady and Daniels, JJ.
#### § 1108.10 Precedent.

Decisions rendered by arbitrators pursuant to these rules may be guided by, but need not be bound by, agency precedent. Arbitration decisions shall have no precedential value and may not be relied upon in any manner during subsequent arbitration proceedings conducted under the rules in this part.
EX-4.39



 Exhibit 4.39 
  

			
	From:	  	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
		  	(Registration No. 1950/038232/06)
		  	Block 27
		  	Randfontein Office Park
		  	Cnr Main Reef Road & Ward Avenue
		  	Randfontein
		  	(the “Lender”)
		
	To:	  	Business Venture Investments No. 1677 Proprietary Limited
		  	(Registration No. 2012/035756/07)
		  	Building H303
		  	18 Melrose Arch
		  	Ground Floor
		  	Melrose Arch
		  	(the “Borrower” and together with the Lender, the “Parties”)

 24 June 2013 

Dear Sirs 
 Term loan facility agreement entered into between
the Borrower (as borrower) and the Lender (as lender) on or about 20 March 2013 in terms of which the Lender agreed to advance a loan to the Borrower, all on the terms and conditions contained therein (the “Facility Agreement”)

  

	1.	Reference is made to the Facility Agreement. Save as defined herein, terms defined in the Facility Agreement (whether directly or by way of incorporation by reference) shall bear the meanings ascribed thereto therein
when used in this letter (this “Waiver Letter”). 

  

	2.	The Lender hereby waives: 

  

	 	2.1.	the Condition Precedent that the Lender receives an original of each Finance Document duly entered into by each Party and an original of each Transaction Document duly entered into by each Party to it contemplated in
Clause 2 of Schedule 1 of the Facility Agreement, on the basis that copies of such executed Finance Documents and Transaction Documents have been received by the Lender; and 


 

	 	2.2.	the fulfilment of the Condition Precedent contemplated in Clause 4.1 of Schedule 1 of the Facility Agreement, namely that the Lender has received evidence that the fees, costs and expenses then due from the Borrower
pursuant to Clause 10 (Fees) have been paid or will be paid by the Closing Date. 

  

	3.	Save as expressly contemplated in this Waiver Letter, the Facility Agreement shall remain unamended and, subject to its terms, of full force and effect. 









	4.	This Waiver Letter comprises a written amendment to the Facility Agreement within the contemplation of clause 28.5.1 thereof and constitutes the whole agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter
hereof. 

  

	5.	This Waiver Letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. 








 As witnessed by the duly authorised representatives of the parties hereto 

 

	
	Signed for and on behalf of:
	
	 /s/


  

	
	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
	
	Name: Frank Abbott
	
	Title: Director
	
	Date: 24 June 2013
	
	Witness: /s/
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1959 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1959

                    To repeal the Walsh-Healey Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1995

  Mr. Fawell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Economic and Educational Opportunities, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    To repeal the Walsh-Healey Act.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALSH-HEALEY REPEAL.

    The Act of June 30, 1936 (41 U.S.C. 35-45) (known as the Walsh-
Healey Act) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```