Dismissed and Opinion Filed May 4, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00408-CR

KEVIN ROGET HALL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-76103-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Pedersen, III, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Kevin Roget Hall was charged with murder with one enhancement 

paragraph. On November 8, 2019, appellant entered into a plea bargain agreement 

with the State in which he judicially confessed to murder and the prior felony 

offense of burglary of a habitation and waived his right to appeal in exchange for 

the State’s recommendation of a twenty-five-year sentence. That same day, the 

trial court followed the plea agreement, found appellant guilty, and assessed 

punishment at twenty-five years in prison. The trial court certified that this was a 

“plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Appellant later filed 
–2–

a notice of appeal which was dated March 23, 2020, postmarked two days later, 

and received by this Court on March 30, 2020. 

A defendant perfects an appeal by filing with the trial court clerk, within 

thirty days after the date sentence was imposed or ninety days if a motion for new 

trial is filed, a written notice of appeal showing his desire to appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(b), (c), 26.2(a), (b). Under the prisoner mailbox rule, if a pro se inmate 

timely delivers a document to prison authorities for forwarding to the court clerk, 

the document is deemed filed when placed with prison officials for mailing. 

Campbell v. State, 320 S.W.3d 338, 344 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). 

In this case, appellant was found guilty and sentenced on November 8, 2019. 

Because no motion for new trial was filed, his notice of appeal was due on 

December 9, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a). Appellant’s March 23, 

2020 notice, post-marked March 25, 2020, is untimely.

Furthermore, the trial court certified appellant’s case was a plea bargain case 

and that he had no right to appeal. A defendant who enters into a plea bargain 

agreement with the State may appeal only matters raised by written motion filed 

and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.

Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Nothing in the 

record shows appellant filed written pre-trial motions that were ruled on before 

trial. And the record is clear that the trial court filed a certification stating the 
–3–

sentence in this case was the result of a plea bargain agreement and appellant has 

no right to appeal.

Under these circumstances, we have no alternative than to dismiss this 

appeal. See Castillo v. Sate, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (in 

absence of timely filed notice of appeal, court must dismiss appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.).

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

200408f.u05

/Bill Pedersen, III//

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
–4–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KEVIN ROGET HALL, Appellant

No. 05-20-00408-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District 

Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-76103-J.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Pedersen, III. Justices Bridges and 

Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want 

of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 4th day of May, 2020.