alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.211 Petition for reconsideration. ( a ) Any person aggrieved by a determination issued under § 107.209 may file a petition for reconsideration. The petition must be filed with the Chief Counsel, in the same manner specified for filing an application in § 107.203(b), within 20 days of publication of the determination in the Federal Register.
( b ) The petition must contain a concise statement of the basis for seeking review, including any specific factual or legal error alleged. If the petition requests consideration of information that was not previously made available to the Chief Counsel, the petition must include the reasons why such information was not previously made available.
( c ) The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to each person who participated, either as an applicant or commenter, in the preemption determination proceeding, accompanied by a statement that the person may submit comments concerning the petition to the Chief Counsel within 20 days. The petition filed with the Chief Counsel must contain a certification that the petitioner has complied with this paragraph and include the names and addresses of all persons to whom a copy of the petition was sent. Late-filed comments are considered so far as practicable.
( d ) The Chief Counsel will publish the decision on the petition for reconsideration or notice of the decision in the Federal Register, at which time the decision on the petition for reconsideration becomes a final agency action.
[Amdt. 107-25, 57 FR 20428, May 13, 1992, as amended by Amdt. 107-38, 61 FR 21099, May 9, 1996; 71 FR 30067, May 25, 2006]
§ 1180.11 Transnational and other informational requirements. ( a ) For applicants whose systems include operations in Canada or Mexico, applicants must explain how cooperation with the Federal Railroad Administration would be maintained to address potential impacts on operations within the United States of operations or events elsewhere on their systems.
( b ) All applicants must assess whether any restrictions or preferences under foreign or domestic law or policies could affect their commercial decisions, and discuss any ownership restrictions applicable to them.
[66 FR 32590, June 15, 2001]
§ 69.111 Between-deck tonnage. ( a ) *Defined.* “Between-deck tonnage” means the tonnage of the space above the line of the tonnage deck and below the line of the uppermost complete deck.
( b ) *Identifying the line of the uppermost complete deck.* ( 1 ) If the uppermost complete deck runs in a continuous line from stem to stern, the line of the uppermost complete deck is the longitudinal line of the underside of the uppermost complete deck.
( 2 ) If the uppermost complete deck is stepped, the line of the uppermost complete deck is the longitudinal line of the underside of the lowest portion of that deck parallel with the upper portions of that deck. Steps that do not extend from side to side or are less than three feet in length are ignored when establishing the line of the uppermost complete deck. Spaces between the line of the uppermost complete deck and the higher portions of the deck are included in superstructure tonnage.
( c ) *Method for calculating tonnage.* The tonnage of each level of the between-deck space is calculated separately, as follows: ( 1 ) The length of each level is measured at the mid-height between the line of the deck above and the line of the deck below. Measure from the point forward where the continuation of the line of the normal frames intersects the center line of the vessel aft to the forward face of the normal transom framing.
( 2 ) Divide the length under paragraph (c)(1) of this section into the same number of equal parts into which the tonnage length is divided under § 69.109(g)(1).
( 3 ) Measure at mid-height the inside breadth of the space to the line of the normal frames at each end and at each point of division of the length. Number the breadths successively “1”, “2”, and so forth beginning at the bow.
( 4 ) Multiply the even numbered breadths by four and the odd numbered breadths by two, except the first and last, which are multiplied by one.
( 5 ) Add together the products under paragraph (c)(4) of this section and multiply the sum by one-third of the interval between the points at which the breadths are taken. The product is the square foot area of the space at mid-height.
( 6 ) Multiply the area of the space at mid-height by the average of the heights taken each point of division of the space. The product divided by 100 is the tonnage of that space.
( 7 ) The between-deck tonnage is the sum of the tonnage of each level within the between-deck space.
[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18726, Mar. 31, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.31 Hour of Meeting]
[Page 380]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.31  hour of meeting

  On motion of Mr. EMERSON, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn to meet at 
10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 15, 1995.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1117]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on sustaining an appeal of a ruling of the Chair.

It was decided in the

Yeas

255

affirmative

Nays

167
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 17, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|ALLIED BANK       | 5B             | Allied Bank, Mulberry, Arkansas, proposes to invest in the capital stock of Lending Cycle, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky, a bank service corporation. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|FIRST BANK        | * Branch       | First Bank, Creve Coeur, Missouri, to establish a branch facility to be located at 104 E. Ontario Avenue, Corona, California.                      | Newspaper:10/30/2009Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:        | 10/30/2009    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 71.75-5 Passenger Ship Safety Certificate. ( a ) All vessels on or certificated for an international voyage are required to have a “ SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate.”
( b ) All such vessels shall meet the requirements of this chapter for vessels on or certificated for an international voyage in addition to the applicable requirements of SOLAS.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16895, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48051, Sept. 18, 1995; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78081, Dec. 14, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (206)
<INVENTORY>                                        258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,004
<PP&E>                                           7,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,835)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,896
<BONDS>                                            367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,634
<SALES>                                         11,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,150
<CGS>                                            6,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,961
<INCOME-TAX>                                        62
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated September 15, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Collegiate Pacific Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended June 30, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report inthe Registration Statements of Collegiate Pacific Inc. on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-34294, effectiveJune 22, 2000), Form S-8 (File No. 333-59878, effective May 1, 2001), and Forms S-3 (File No.333-116282, effective June 22, 2004, File No. 333-118240, effective August 20, 2004 and File No.333-122250, effective February 28, 2006)./s/ Grant Thornton LLPDallas, Texas
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending April 27, 2013

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BROOKLINE BANK    | * Branch       | Application by Brookline Bank, Brookline, Massachusetts, to establish a full-service branch at 456 Main Street, Waltham, Massachusetts, pursuant to Section 208.6 of Regulation H. | Newspaper:05/04/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 05/04/2013    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 14, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PATRIOT FINANCIAL PARTNERS LP | CIC           | Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, GP, LLC, Patriot Financial Managers, L.P., Patriot Financial Manager, LLC. and Messrs. Ira M. Lubert, W. Kirk Wycoff and James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to purchase up to 24.9 percent of Porter Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, KY. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/21/2011
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 09/21/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:** Annual report (Commodity CreditCorporation)

 
2007,2008,2009

 
SuDoc Number: A 82.301:
CGP system Number: 000772269
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 10, 2011

|Filer                  | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|ALTON BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3       | Alton Bancshares, Inc., Alton, Missouri, to acquire 100 percent of First Community Bank of the Ozarks, Branson, Missouri. | Newspaper:01/07/2012Federal Register:12/27/2011
|Newspaper:             | 01/07/2012 
|Federal Register:      | 12/27/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA SOCORRO AGASINO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-71468

Agency No. A092-177-125

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2009** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Maria Socorro Agasino (Agasino) petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying her petition to reopen her case to

seek relief pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c).

FILED

DEC 10 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Agasino raised the argument that retroactive application of the expanded

“aggravated felony” definition violates due process in her prior petition, so it is

now barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion. See In re Reynoso, 477 F.3d 1117,

1122 (9th Cir. 2007). Likewise, Agasino could have raised her claim that

application of the expanded definition violates her right to equal protection, so that

claim is barried by the doctrine of claim preclusion. See United States v. Bhatia,

545 F.3d 757, 759 (9th Cir. 2008). Because Agasino is not entitled to relief, the

BIA acted within its discretion when it denied Agasino’s motion to reopen

proceedings. See Bunty Ngaeth v. Mukasey, 545 F.3d 796, 799-800 (9th Cir.

2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### James Scott, *Appellant, v.*Frederika Mendelbaum, Respondent.

Order modified by reducing the amount ordered to be paid to $100, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.15 Call in Committee]
[Page 1054]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.15  call in committee

  Mr. HANSEN, Chairman, announced that the Committee, having had under 
consideration said bill, finding itself without a quorum, directed the 
Members to record their presence by electronic device, and the 
following-named Members responded--
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 121 (Monday, June 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 28, 2007, 1 p.m. to June 
28, 2007, 3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on June 
11, 2007, 72 FR 32129-32131.
    The meeting will be held July 23, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. The 
meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 15, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3076 Filed 6-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 21-10071

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00153-MMH-PDB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SEAN-MICHAEL SMITH,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(August 18, 2021)

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 21-10071 Date Filed: 08/18/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for Sean-Michael Smith in this appeal, 

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a 

brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following the 

revocation of Smith’s supervised release. Our independent review of the entire 

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is 

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable 

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s

revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED. 

USCA11 Case: 21-10071 Date Filed: 08/18/2021 Page: 2 of 2