alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1892

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify the requirements

applicable to hearing aid compatible telephones in workplaces.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 1995

Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. EHRLICH, and Mr. GILLMOR)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify the

requirements applicable to hearing aid compatible telephones in workplaces.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RETROFITTING OF HEARING AID COMPATIBLE

4 TELEPHONES NOT REQUIRED.

5 Section 710(e) of the Communications Act of 1934

6 (47 U.S.C. 610(e)) is amended by adding at the end there7 of the following: ‘‘Such regulations shall not require an

8 employer to replace or retrofit telephones to meet the re9 quirements of subsection (b)(1) if such telephones (1) were
2

•HR 1892 IH

1 in use prior to August 16, 1989, (2) are located in non2 common areas of the workplace, and (3) are not coin-oper3 ated telephones or telephones the principle purpose of

4 which is for emergency use.’’.

Æ
#### Maria E. G. McK. Ward et al., Appellants, *v.*Mary M. Ward et al., Respondents.

*Ward*v. *Ward,*130 App. Div. 27, affirmed.

(Argued October 3, 1910;

decided November 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 23, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at *590Special Term in an action to impress a trust upon certain property.

*William G. Wilson*for appellants.

*Henry M. Ward*and *John L. Cadwalader*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscooic and Chase, JJ.
§ 196.27-1 Master's and officer's responsibility. ( a ) Nothing in this part shall exonerate any master or officer in command from the consequences of any neglect to keep a proper lookout or the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen or by the special circumstances of the case.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending May 25, 2013

|Filer                                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION    | Investment     | Bank of America, N.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, to make an investment of $4.6 billion in Banc of America Securities Limited, London, England.                                                    | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                               | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                        | Not applicable
|VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANKSHARES CORPORATION | * 3A1          | Virginia National Bankshares Corporation, Charlottesville, Virginia, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of Virginia National Bank, Charlottesville, Virginia. | Newspaper:05/17/2013Federal Register:Not available     
|Newspaper:                               | 05/17/2013    
|Federal Register:                        | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2013 (July 1, 2013 - September 30, 2013)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
14 CFR §91.7 (a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness 

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil 

aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no 

airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this 

exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist 

for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft 

and the requirements contained in the Operating Manual for 

maintenance and use of safety checks prior to each flight, as 

set forth in the Operating Manual, an equivalent level of 

safety will be provided.

14 CFR §91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight 

Manual in the Aircraft 

Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.-

registered civil aircraft—

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not 

required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in 

the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight 

Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, 

or any combination thereof. 

The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or 

place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only 

because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no 

room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. 

The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping 

the Operating Manual at the ground control point where the 

pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to it. The 

FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: 

Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 

9565B, 10167, 10167A 10602, 32827, and 10700
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ROMALA STONE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2010-1044 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Georgia in No. 04-CV-2307, Judge 

Richard W. Story. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

THOMAS N. PARSEKIAN, Parksekian Law Corporation, 

of Laguna Niguel, California, argued for plaintiffappellant. Of counsel was SANFORD ASTOR, Lewis 

Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, of Los Angeles, 

California. 

HOLMES J. HAWKINS III, King & Spalding LLP, of 

Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendant-appellee. With 

him on the brief were LETITIA A. MCDONALD, THOMAS C.

LUNDIN JR.; and PAUL D. CLEMENT and DARYL L.

JOSEFFER, of Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge), FRIEDMAN, and 

LINN, Circuit Judges). 
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 September 9, 2010 __/s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.4 Calendar Wednesday Business Dispensed With]
[Page 632]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.4  calendar wednesday business dispensed with

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That business in order for consideration on Wednesday, May 
10, 1995, under clause 7, rule XXIV, the Calendar Wednesday rule, be 
dispensed with.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39076-39077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Evidence Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Evidence Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence Procedure will 
hold a one-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES:  November 16, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Mecham 
Conference Center, One Columbus Circle, NE., Washington, DC 20544.

[[Page 39077]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: July 9, 2007.
James Ishida,
Senior Attorney Advisor, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 07-3470 Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 106

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 106.20 Notice of proposed rulemaking.

A notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) contains PHMSA's specific proposed regulatory changes for public comment and contains supporting information. It generally includes proposed regulatory text.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.54 Adjournment]
[Page 1065]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.54  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. SHAW, pursuant to the special order heretofore agreed 
to, at 9 o'clock and 57 minutes a.m., Thursday, June 29 (legislative day 
of Wednesday, June 28), 1995, the House adjourned until 11:30 a.m., on 
today, June 29, 1995.
```
Exhibit 99.3

                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Ted R. Winnowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/ Ted R. Winnowski
--------------------
Ted R. Winnowski
President & Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
#### Ann Mallach, Respondent, *v.*Edward Ridley and others, *Appellants.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinions by

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J.;

Brady, J., concurring in result.
December 21, 1978



## Judges—Members of Congress—Constitutional Restriction on Appointment (Article I, § 6, cl. 2)— Omnibus Judgeship Bill (28 U.S.C. § 133, as amended)

This responds to your inquiry concerning any legal restriction against the appointment of former or sitting Members of Congress to civil offices created by Congress at the time such persons were Congressmen. Specifically, the issue concerns the appointment of former members of the 95th Congress to the new judgeships created by the Omnibus Judgeship Bill; 28 U.S.C. § 133, as amended by 92 Stat. 1630. The relevant legal provision is Article 1, § 6, cl. 2, of the Constitution: No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. This provision poses no obstacle with respect to any current member of the House of Representatives since each member’s term will expire, under the Twentieth Amendment, at noon on January 3, 1979.1 The same cannot be said for each current Senator. A Senator is, under the Seventeenth Amendment, elected for a term of 6 years. However, under the Constitution, Article 1, § 3, cl. 2, the terms of Senators are staggered so that one-third are chosen every second year. Accordingly, only those whose terms expire at noon on January 3, 1979, will be eligible under Article 1, § 6, cl. 2, for appointment to the subject 

## 78-99 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT

'Even if a member of the House of Representatives were reelected to a new term in the pastelection he would not be disqualified for appointment to one of the judgeships because the judgeships were created during the term expiring at noon on January 3. 1979. the term that constitutes the period of disqualification.

431judgeships at that time. While other Senators will not be eligible in 1979 for

appointment to the judgeships, their disqualification will lapse upon the expiration of their elected terms.

J o h n M . H a r m o n Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel



### 432
#### § 1112.2 Decisions directing modified procedure.

A decision directing that modified procedure be used will set out the schedule for filing verified statements by all parties and will list the names and addresses of all persons who at that time are on the service list in the proceeding. In this part, a statement responding to an opening statement is referred to as a “reply”, and a statement responding to a reply is referred to as a “rebuttal”. Replies to rebuttal material are not permitted. The filing of motions or other pleadings will not automatically stay or delay the established procedural schedule. Parties will adhere to this schedule unless the Board issues an order modifying the schedule.

[47 FR 49558, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 58491, Nov. 15, 1996]
#### § 97.55-1 Master's responsibility.

Before loading bulk grain or any bulk solid cargo to which § 148.435 of this chapter applies, the master shall have the lighting circuits to cargo compartments in which the grain or bulk solid cargo is to be loaded de-energized at the distribution panel or panel board. He shall thereafter have periodic inspections made of the panel or panel board as frequently as necessary to ascertain that the affected circuits remain de-energized while this bulk cargo remains within the vessel.

[USCG-2009-0091, 75 FR 64591, Oct. 19, 2010]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### U.S. Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 106-503, the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee (SESAC) will hold its 15th meeting. The meeting location is the U.S. Geological Survey, John Wesley Powell National Center, Room 1B215, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192. The Committee is comprised of members from academia, industry, and State government. The Committee shall advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on matters relating to the USGS's participation in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.

The Committee will receive updates and provide guidance on Earthquake Hazards Program activities and the status of teams supported by the Program, as well as a report from the Advanced National Seismic System steering committee.

Meetings of the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee are open to the public.

# DATES:

February 12, 2007, commencing at 8:30 a.m. and adjourning at Noon on February 13, 2007.

*Contact:*                         Dr. David Applegate, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 905, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-6714,                         *applegate@usgs.gov*.                    

Dated: January 22, 2007.

P. Patrick Leahy,

Associate Director for Geology.

[FR Doc. 07-375 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: animeluvr666@hotmail.com [mailto:animeluvr666@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:24 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cori Bishop 

"2555 Dole Street, Room 219B" 

Honolulu, HI 96822
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 18 (Monday, January 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 4065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERAMS AFFAIRS


Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held at VA 
Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC on April 25-26, 
2007. The meeting will be held in Room 930 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
on April 25 and from 8 a.m. to 12 noon on April 26. This meeting is 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advie to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters 
pertaining to geriatrics and grontology by assessing the capability of 
VA health care facilities to meet the medical, psychological, and 
social needs of older veterans and by evaluating VA facilities 
designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    The meeting will feature presentations on VA research initiatives 
in areas that affect aging and dementia treatment initiatives. Other 
topics will include Primary Care Geriatrics Performance Measures and 
Geriatric Primary Care Panel Size Analysis, and performance oversight 
of the VA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide 
written comments for review by the Committee not less than 10 days in 
advance of the meeting to Mrs. Marcia Holt-Delaney, Office of 
Geriatrics and Extended Care (114), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Individuals who wish to 
attend the meeting should contact Mr. Holt-Delaney, Program Analyst, at 
(202) 273-8540.

    Dated: January 22, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-352 Filed 1-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
§ 176.176 Signals. When Class 1 (explosive) materials are being loaded, handled, or unloaded on a vessel, the vessel must exhibit the following signals: ( a ) By day, flag “B” (Bravo) of the international code of signals; and
( b ) By night, an all-round fixed red light.
#### Consolidated Rubber Tire Company, Appellant, *v.*Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Respondent.

*Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.*v. *Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.,*135 App. Div. 805, affirmed.

(Argued June 1, 1910;

decided June 17, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1909, which 'reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint and sustained such demurrer in an action to recover royalties due under an alleged license agreement.

The following question was certified : “ Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*Charles W. Stapleton*for appellant.

*Philip B. Adams*and *Amos G. Miller*for respondent.

*537Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative ; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Yarn, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Cli. J.