NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Health Statistics

The consumption of added sugars, which are sweeteners added to processed 

and prepared foods, has been associated with measures of cardiovascular 

disease risk among adolescents, including adverse cholesterol concentrations 

(1). Although the percent of daily calories derived from added sugars declined 

between 1999–2000 and 2007–2008 (2), consumption of added sugars remains 

high in the diets of Americans. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines recommend 

limiting total intake of discretionary calories, which include added sugars and 

solid fats, to 5%–15% of daily caloric intake (3), yet many Americans continue 

to exceed these recommendations (2). This data brief presents results for added 

sugar consumption among U.S. children and adolescents for 2005–2008.

Keywords: calories • income • National Health and Nutrition 

Examination Survey

Are there differences in the mean number of calories 

consumed from added sugars by boys and girls and by 

age group?

Boys consumed more calories per day from added sugars than girls. Boys 

Key findings

Data from the National 

Health and Nutrition 

Examination Survey, 

2005–2008

•	 Non-Hispanic white children 

and adolescents consume a 

larger percent of their calories 

from added sugars than do 

Mexican-American children 

and adolescents.

•	 There was no difference in 

consumption of added sugars 

by income among children 

and adolescents.

•	 More added sugars calories 

came from foods rather than 

beverages.

•	 More added sugars calories 

were consumed at home rather 

than away from home.

Consumption of Added Sugar Among U.S. Children 

and Adolescents, 2005–2008

R. Bethene Ervin, Ph.D., R.D.; Brian K. Kit, M.D., M.P.H.; Margaret D. Carroll, M.S.P.H.; 

and Cynthia L. Ogden, Ph.D., M.R.P.

1

Significantly different from females, p < 0.05. 2

Significant linear trend by age, p < 0.05.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2008.

Figure 1. Mean kilocalories from added sugars among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years, 

by sex and age group: United States, 2005–2008 Kilocalories

0

100

200

300

400

500 Total 2–5 years 6–11 years 12–19 years

Male Female

3621

282

2182

1962

345

442

293

314
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

■  2  ■

consumed an average of 362 kilocalories (kcals) from added sugars compared with 282 kcals for 

girls (Figure 1). Caloric intake from added sugars increased linearly with age for boys and girls. 

Preschool-aged boys (2–5 years) consumed an average of 218 kcals from added sugars, 

school-aged boys (6–11 years) consumed an average of 345 kcals from added sugars, and 

adolescent boys (12–19 years) consumed an average of 442 kcals from added sugars. Preschoolaged girls (2–5 years) consumed an average of 196 kcals from added sugars, school-aged girls 

(6–11 years) consumed 293 kcals from added sugars, and adolescent girls (12–19 years) 

consumed 314 kcals from added sugars.

Are there differences in the percent of calories consumed from added 

sugars by age group?

There was a small but significant difference in the percent of calories from added sugars

between boys and girls. Boys consumed an average of 16.3% of their calories from added sugars, 

while girls consumed an average of 15.5% of their calories from added sugars (Figure 2). 

The percent of calories contributed by added sugars increased linearly with age for boys and girls 

(Figure 2). Preschool-aged boys consumed 13.5% of their calories from added sugars, 6–11 yearolds consumed 16.6% of their calories from added sugars, and 12–19 year-olds consumed 17.5% 

of their calories from added sugars. Preschool-aged girls consumed 13.1% of their calories from 

added sugars, 6–11 year-olds consumed 15.7% of their calories from added sugars, and 12–19 

year-olds consumed 16.6% of their calories from added sugars.

1

Significantly different from females, p < 0.05. 2

Significant linear trend by age, p < 0.05.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2008.

Figure 2. Mean percent of kilocalories from added sugars among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years, by sex and 

age group: United States, 2005–2008 Percent

0

5

10

15

20 Total 2–5 years 6–11 years 12–19 years

Male Female

16.31

13.52

16.6

17.5

15.5

13.12

15.7

16.6
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

■  3  ■

Are there differences in the percent of calories consumed from added 

sugars by race and ethnicity?

Non-Hispanic white boys consumed a larger percent of their total calories from added sugars than 

Mexican-American boys (Figure 3). The percent of calories consumed by non-Hispanic black 

boys fell in between these two groups, but was not significantly different from either of them.

Non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black girls consumed larger percents of their total calories 

from added sugars than Mexican-American girls, but there were no significant differences

between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black girls.

1

Significantly different from Mexican-American children and adolescents, p < 0.05.

NOTE: Persons of other race and ethnicity are not shown.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2008.

Figure 3. Mean percent of kilocalories from added sugars among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years, by sex and 

race and ethnicity: United States, 2005–2008 Percent

17.21

15.9

14.8

16.11

15.91

14.0

0

5

10

15

20 Non-Hispanic white Non-Hispanic black Mexican American

Male Female
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

■  4  ■

Are there differences in the percent of calories consumed from added 

sugars by poverty income ratio?

There were no significant differences in the percent of total calories from added sugars based on

poverty income ratio (PIR) either for boys or girls (Figure 4). The percent of calories for the three 

PIR groups ranged from 16.1% to 16.8% for boys and 15.2% to 15.9% for girls.

Were children and adolescents more likely to consume the added sugars 

from foods and beverages at home or away from home?

Foods contributed significantly more of the added sugar calories than beverages (data not shown

in figure). Fifty-nine percent of added sugars calories came from foods compared with 41% that

came from beverages. More of the added sugars calories were consumed at home rather than 

away from home for both beverages and foods. These results are consistent with results for total 

caloric intakes. That is, 65% of the total calories that children and adolescents consumed were 

consumed at home. The remainder was consumed away from home. Slightly more than one-half 

of the added sugars calories from beverages were consumed at home (54%), while nearly twothirds of the added sugars consumed from foods were consumed at home (66%) (Figure 5).

NOTE: PIR is poverty income ratio.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2008.

Figure 4. Mean percent of kilocalories from added sugars among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years, by poverty 

income ratio: United States, 2005–2008 Percent

16.1

16.8 16.2 15.9 15.7 15.2

0

5

10

15

20 PIR < 130% 130% PIR < 350% PIR 350%

Male Female
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

■  5  ■

1

Significantly different from kilocalories from added sugars consumed away from home, p < 0.05.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2008.

Figure 5. Percentage of kilocalories from added sugars among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years, by type of food 

and location food was consumed: United States, 2005–2008 Percent

54.41

65.81

45.6

34.2

0

20

40

60

80 Home Away from home

Beverages Food

Summary

Approximately 16% of children and adolescents’ total caloric intakes came from added sugars. 

Boys consumed more added sugars than girls. Preschool-aged children consumed the fewest 

calories from added sugars. Although girls consumed a smaller absolute amount of calories from 

added sugars than boys, their intakes were not that different from boys when the amounts are 

expressed as a percentage of total caloric intakes.

Non-Hispanic white children and adolescents consumed a larger percentage of their calories from 

added sugars than Mexican-American children and adolescents. Also, Non-Hispanic black girls 

consumed a larger percentage of their calories from added sugars than Mexican-American girls. 

There was very little difference in added sugar consumption based on PIR.

More of the added sugars calories came from foods as opposed to beverages. Previous research 

has demonstrated that sodas are the single leading food source of added sugars intakes among 

children, adolescents, and adults (2,4). Our results showed a little more than 40% of calories 

from added sugars came from beverages. Poti and Popkin (5) have suggested that eating location 

impacts daily energy intake in children and adolescents and that foods prepared away from home, 

are contributing to their increased total energy intake. Our results showed that more of the added 

sugars calories were consumed at home rather than away from home. 

A substantial percentage of calories in the diets of children and adolescents between 2005 

and 2008 came from added sugars. According to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines “reducing the 

consumption of these sources of added sugars will lower the caloric content of the diet, without 

compromising its nutrient adequacy (3).” This strategy could play an important role in reducing 

the high prevalence of obesity in the United States (6) without compromising adequate nutrition.
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

■  6  ■

Definitions

Calories versus kilocalories: A calorie is a measure of the energy produced as foods or beverages 

are burned for energy in the body. The term calorie is usually used when discussing energy from 

foods and diets, but the calorie being referred to is actually a kilocalorie (7). In this paper the term 

calorie actually refers to kilocalorie. Calories from added sugars represent the energy from added 

sugars. Percentage of daily calories from added sugars represents the percentage of total daily 

energy obtained from added sugars.

Added sugars: Added sugars include all sugars used as ingredients in processed and prepared 

foods such as breads, cakes, soft drinks, jams, chocolates, ice cream, and sugars eaten separately 

or added to foods at the table. Examples of added sugars include white sugar, brown sugar, raw 

sugar, corn syrup, corn syrup solids, high fructose corn syrup, malt syrup, maple syrup, pancake 

syrup, fructose sweetener, liquid fructose, honey, molasses, anhydrous dextrose, crystal dextrose, 

and dextrin (http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/12355000/pdf/mped/mped2_doc.

pdf#Chapter10).

Type of food consumed: A measure indicating whether the source of the added sugar was a food or 

beverage. Beverages included milk and milk substitutes, sugar drinks (fruit drinks, sodas, energy 

and sports drinks, and sweetened bottled water), fruit juices, nectars, vegetable juices, coffee, tea, 

and alcoholic beverages. Foods included anything that was not classified as a beverage.

Location of added sugar consumption: Respondents to the 24-hour dietary recall interview were 

asked where each reported food or beverage was consumed—at home or away from home. 

Poverty income ratio (PIR): A measure representing the ratio of household income to the poverty 

threshold after accounting for inflation and family size. In 2008, a PIR of 350% was equivalent

to approximately $77,000 for a family of four; a PIR of 130% was equivalent to approximately 

$29,000 for a family of four. In 2008, median household income was approximately $50,000 

and 13.2% of the population lived below the poverty level, based on U.S. Census Bureau data 

(http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb09-141.html). The cut 

point for participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is 130% of the 

poverty level.

Data source and methods

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used for 

these analyses. NHANES is a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and 

nutritional status of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population (8). The survey consists 

of interviews conducted in participants’ homes, standardized physical examinations in mobile

examination centers (MEC), and laboratory tests utilizing blood and urine specimens provided by

participants during the physical examination. Dietary information for this analysis was obtained 

via an in-person 24-hour dietary recall interview in the MEC.

The NHANES sample is selected through a complex, multistage design that includes selection 

of primary sampling units (counties), household segments within the counties, households 

within segments and, finally, sample persons from selected households. The sample design

includes oversampling to obtain reliable estimates of health and nutritional measures for 

population subgroups. In 2005–2006, African-American and Mexican-American subgroups were 
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

■  7  ■

oversampled. In 2007–2008 African-American subgroups and overall Latino subgroups were 

oversampled, with sufficient sample sizes for analysis of Mexican-American subgroups. In 1999,

NHANES became a continuous survey, fielded on an ongoing basis. Each year of data collection

is based on a representative sample covering all ages of the civilian, noninstitutionalized

population. Public-use data files are released in 2-year cycles.

Sample weights, which account for the differential probabilities of selection, nonresponse, 

and noncoverage, were incorporated into the estimation process. The standard errors of the 

percentages were estimated using Taylor Series Linearization, a method that incorporates the

sample weights and sample design.

Differences between groups were evaluated using a t-statistic at the p < 0.05 significance level.

Test for trends by age were evaluated using linear regression and the significance level was set at

p < 0.05. All differences reported are statistically significant unless otherwise indicated. Statistical

analyses were conducted using the SAS System for Windows (release 9.2; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, 

N.C.) and SUDAAN (release 10.0; Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N.C.).

About the authors

R. Bethene Ervin, Brian K. Kit, Margaret D. Carroll, and Cynthia L. Ogden work at the Centers 

for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health and 

Nutrition Examination Surveys.

References

1. Welsh JA, Sharma A, Cunningham SA, Vos MB. Consumption of added sugars and indicators 

of cardiovascular disease risk among U.S. adolescents. Circulation 123(3):249–57. 2011.

2. Welsh JA, Sharma AJ, Grellinger L, Vos MB. Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in 

the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 94(3):726–34. 2011.

3. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary 

guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2010.

4. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among 

children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 110(10):1477–84. 2010.

5. Poti JM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake among U.S. children by eating location and food 

source, 1997–2006. JADA 111:1156–64. 2011.

6. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass 

index in U.S. children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA 303:242–9. 2010.

7. Energy. In: Food, nutrition & diet therapy. 7th ed. Krause MV, Mahan LK (editors). 9–23. 

Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company. 1984.

8. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 

Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation. Available from: 

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm.
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 87 ■ March 2012

Suggested citation

Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. 

Consumption of added sugar among U.S. 

children and adolescents, 2005–2008. NCHS 

data brief no 87. Hyattsville, MD: National 

Center for Health Statistics. 2012.

Copyright information

All material appearing in this report is in 

the public domain and may be reproduced 

or copied without permission; citation as to 

source, however, is appreciated.

National Center for Health 

Statistics

Edward J. Sondik, Ph.D., Director

Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Associate 

Director for Science

Division of Health and Nutrition 

Examination Surveys

Clifford L. Johnson, M.S.P.H., Director

For e-mail updates on NCHS publication 

releases, subscribe online at: 

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/govdelivery.htm

For questions or general information

about NCHS:

Tel: 1–800–232–4636

E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov

Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs

ISSN 1941–4927 (Print ed.)

ISSN 1941–4935 (Online ed.)

CS229789

DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2012–1209

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Health Statistics

3311 Toledo Road

Hyattsville, MD 20782

OFFICIAL BUSINESS 

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300

FIRST CLASS MAIL 

POSTAGE & FEES PAID 

CDC/NCHS

PERMIT NO. G-284