alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.31 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1059]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.31  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. TRAFICANT:

       Page 78, after line 5, insert the following new section:

                 across-the-board reduction of amounts

       Sec. 564. (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection 
     (b), each amount appropriated or otherwise made available by 
     this Act that is not required to be appropriated or otherwise 
     made available by a provision of law is hereby reduced by 1 
     percent.
       (b) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to the 
     amounts appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act 
     for the following:
       (1) ``Export and Investment Assistance'' (title I of this 
     Act).
       (2) ``Development Assistance Fund''.
       (3) ``Development Fund for Africa''.
       (4) ``International Disaster Assistance''.
       (5) ``African Development Foundation''.
       (6) ``Inter-American Foundation''.
       (7) ``Peace Corps''.
       (8) ``International Narcotics Control''.
       (9) ``Anti-Terrorism Assistance''.
       (10) ``Nonproliferation and Disarmament''.
       (11) ``Contribution to the International Development 
     Association''.
       (12) ``Contribution to the Asian Development Fund''. 

It was decided in the

Yeas

139

negative

Nays

270
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 30, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[107th Congress Public Law 6]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ006.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 8]]

Public Law 107-6
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, as the ``Goro Hokama Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: Apr. 12, 2001 -  [H.R. 132]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 620 
Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Goro Hokama Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Goro Hokama Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved April 12, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 132:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Feb. 7, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1503.413 Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty. ( a ) *Issuance.* TSA may initiate a civil penalty action under this section by serving a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty on the person charged with a violation of a TSA requirement. TSA will serve the Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty on the individual charged with a violation or on the president of the corporation or company charged with a violation, or other representative or employee previously identified in writing to TSA as designated to receive such service. A corporation or company may designate in writing to TSA another person to receive service of any subsequent documents in that civil penalty action.
( b ) *Contents.* The Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty contains a statement of the facts alleged, the statute, regulation, or order allegedly violated, the amount of the proposed civil penalty, and a certificate of service.
( c ) *Response.* Not later than 30 days after receipt of the Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, the person charged with a violation may take one, and only one, of the following options. ( 1 ) Submit a certified check or money order in the amount of the proposed civil penalty made payable to Transportation Security Administration, at the address specified in the Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, or make payment electronically through *http://www.pay.gov .*
( 2 ) Submit to the agency attorney who issued the Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty one of the following: ( i ) A written request that TSA issue an Order Assessing Civil Penalty in the amount stated in the Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty without further notice, in which case the person waives the right to request a Formal Hearing, and payment is due within 30 days of receipt of the Order.
( ii ) Written information and other evidence, including documents and witness statements, demonstrating that a violation of the regulations did not occur as alleged, or that the proposed penalty is not warranted by the circumstances.
( iii ) A written request to reduce the proposed civil penalty, the amount of requested reduction, together with any documents supporting a reduction of the proposed civil penalty, which reflect a current financial inability to pay or records showing that payment of the proposed civil penalty would prevent the person from continuing in business.
( iv ) A written request for an Informal Conference, at a date to be determined by the agency attorney, to discuss the matter with the agency attorney and to submit supporting evidence and information to the agency attorney before the date of the Informal Conference.
( 3 ) Submit to the agency attorney and to TSA's Enforcement Docket Clerk a written request for a Formal Hearing before an ALJ in accordance with subpart G of this part. TSA's Enforcement Docket Clerk is currently located at the United States Coast Guard (USCG) ALJ Docketing Center, 40 S. Gay Street, Room 412, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022. If this location changes, TSA will provide notice of the change by notice in the Federal Register.
§ 177.800 Purpose and scope of this part and responsibility for compliance and training. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This part prescribes requirements, in addition to those contained in parts 171, 172, 173, 178 and 180 of this subchapter, that are applicable to the acceptance and transportation of hazardous materials by private, common, or contract carriers by motor vehicle.
( b ) *Responsibility for compliance.* Unless this subchapter specifically provides that another person shall perform a particular duty, each carrier, including a connecting carrier, shall perform the duties specified and comply with all applicable requirements in this part and shall ensure its hazmat employees receive training in relation thereto.
( c ) *Responsibility for training.* A carrier may not transport a hazardous material by motor vehicle unless each of its hazmat employees involved in that transportation is trained as required by this part and subpart H of part 172 of this subchapter.
( d ) *No unnecessary delay in movement of shipments.* All shipments of hazardous materials must be transported without unnecessary delay, from and including the time of commencement of the loading of the hazardous material until its final unloading at destination.
[Amdt. 177-79, 57 FR 20954, May 15, 1992, as amended by Amdt.177-86, 61 FR 18933, Apr. 29, 1996]
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40854-40855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3634]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

[FRL-8445-5]

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92463, EPA 
gives notice of a meeting of the National Advisory Council for 
Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to 
the EPA Administrator on a broad range of environmental policy, 
technology, and management issues. The Council is a panel of 
individuals who represent diverse interests from academia, industry, 
non-governmental organizations, and local, state, and tribal 
governments. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the NACEPT 
agenda, including sustainable water infrastructure, environmental 
stewardship, cooperative conservation, energy and the environment, and 
environmental indicators. A copy of the agenda for the meeting will be 
posted at http://www.epa.gov/ocem/nacept/cal-nacept.htm.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a two day open meeting on Thursday, August 9, 
2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. and Friday, August 10, 2007 from 12 p.m. 
to 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Boston Park Plaza Hotel, 50 
Park Plaza at Arlington Street, Boston, MA, 02116. The meeting is open 
to the public, with limited seating on a first-come, first-served 
basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Sonia Altieri, Designated Federal 
Officer, [email protected], (202) 564-0243, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Cooperative Environmental Management (1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 24060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or to provide 
written comments to the Council should be sent to Sonia Altieri, 
Designated Federal Officer, at the contact information above. The 
public is welcome to attend all portions of the meeting.

[[Page 40855]]

    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Sonia Altieri at 202-564-
0243 or [email protected]. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Sonia Altieri, preferably at least 10 days 
prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process 
your request.

    Dated: July 13, 2007.
Sonia Altieri,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3634 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39420-39421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3517]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 72 FR 37221, 
Monday, July 9, 2007.

[[Page 39421]]


PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 
10 a.m. (Eastern Time).

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The meeting has been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Issued: July 16, 2007.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 07-3517 Filed 7-16-07; 12:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
§ 178.337-13 Supporting and anchoring. ( a ) A cargo tank that is not permanently attached to or integral with a vehicle chassis must be secured by the use of restraining devices designed to prevent relative motion between the cargo tank and the vehicle chassis when the vehicle is in operation. Such restraining devices must be readily accessible for inspection and maintenance.
( b ) On a cargo tank motor vehicle designed and constructed so that the cargo tank constitutes in whole or in part the structural member used in place of a motor vehicle frame, the cargo tank must be supported by external cradles. A cargo tank mounted on a motor vehicle frame must be supported by external cradles or longitudinal members. Where used, the cradles must subtend at least 120 degrees of the shell circumference.
( c ) The design calculations of the support elements must satisfy the requirements of § 178.337-3, (a), (b), (c), and (d).
( d ) Where any cargo tank support is attached to any part of a cargo tank head, the stresses imposed upon the head must be provided for as required in paragraph (c) of this section.
[68 FR 19280, Apr. 18, 2003]
§ 15.15 SSI disclosed by DOT. ( a ) *In general.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, and notwithstanding the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), and other laws, records containing SSI are not available for public inspection or copying, nor does DOT release such records to persons without a need to know.
( b ) *Disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.* If a record contains both SSI and information that is not SSI, DOT, on a proper Freedom of Information Act or Privacy Act request, may disclose the record with the SSI redacted, provided the record is not otherwise exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act or Privacy Act.
( c ) *Disclosures to committees of Congress and the General Accounting Office.* Nothing in this part precludes DOT from disclosing SSI to a committee of Congress authorized to have the information or to the Comptroller General, or to any authorized representative of the Comptroller General.
( d ) *Disclosure in enforcement proceedings* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The Secretary of DOT may provide SSI to a person in the context of an administrative enforcement proceeding when, in the sole discretion of the Secretary, access to the SSI is necessary for the person to prepare a response to allegations contained in a legal enforcement action document issued by DOT.
( 2 ) *Security background check.* Prior to providing SSI to a person under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the Secretary of DOT may require the individual or, in the case of an entity, the individuals representing the entity, and their counsel, to undergo and satisfy, in the judgment of the Secretary of DOT, a security background check.
( e ) *Other conditional disclosure.* The Secretary of DOT may authorize a conditional disclosure of specific records or information that constitute SSI upon the written determination by the Secretary that disclosure of such records or information, subject to such limitations and restrictions as the Secretary may prescribe, would not be detrimental to transportation safety.
( f ) *Obligation to protect information.* When an individual receives SSI pursuant to paragraph (d) or (e) of this section that individual becomes a covered person under § 15.7 and is subject to the obligations of a covered person under this part.
( g ) *No release under FOIA.* When DOT discloses SSI pursuant to paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, DOT makes the disclosure for the sole purpose described in that paragraph. Such disclosure is not a public release of information under the Freedom of Information Act.
( h ) *Disclosure of Critical Infrastructure Information.* Disclosure of information that is both SSI and has been designated as critical infrastructure information under section 214 of the Homeland Security Act is governed solely by the requirements of section 214 and any implementing regulations.
1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

D-1 DAVID HANSBERRY, 

 Defendant. 

 / 

Case No. 2:15-cr-20217-1 

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS 

FOR CLARIFICATION ON DEADLINE TO FILE 2255 MOTION [292, 293]

On October 9, 2020 the Court received two motions from Defendant David 

Hansberry that requested clarification on when to file his 28 U.SC. § 2255 motion for 

habeas corpus relief. ECF 292, 293. But the Court lacks jurisdiction to answer those 

requests. See United States v. Asakevich, 810 F.3d 418, 420 (6th Cir. 2016) ("[N]o 

justiciable controversy exists when parties . . . ask for an advisory opinion. This 

prohibition covers a party's—in truth a non-litigant's—request for an opinion[] 

advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts.") (internal citations 

and quotations omitted). Although the Court may determine whether a § 2255 motion 

is timely, doing so before the actual motion is filed would be an advisory opinion. The 

Court will therefore deny Defendant's motion for clarification. 

 Should Defendant file his § 2255 motion the Court will have an active "case or 

controversy" and consider the timeliness of the motion. Id. 

Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 296 filed 10/19/20 PageID.7460 Page 1 of 2
 2

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motions for 

clarification on deadline to file § 2255motion [292, 293] are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/ Stephen J. Murphy, III 

 STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: October 19, 2020 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on October 19, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/ David P. Parker 

 Case Manager 

Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 296 filed 10/19/20 PageID.7461 Page 2 of 2
§ 1572.23 TWIC expiration. ( a ) A TWIC expires five years after the date it was issued at the end of the calendar day, except as follows: ( 1 ) The TWIC was issued based on a determination that the applicant completed a comparable threat assessment. If issued pursuant to a comparable threat assessment, the TWIC expires five years from the date on the credential associated with the comparable threat assessment.
( 2 ) The applicant is in a lawful nonimmigrant status category listed in 1572.105(a)(7), and the status expires, the employer terminates the employment relationship with the applicant, or the applicant otherwise ceases working for the employer. Under any of these circumstances, TSA deems the TWIC to have expired regardless of the expiration date on the face of the TWIC.
( b ) TSA may issue a TWIC for a term less than five years to match the expiration of a visa.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.2

                   SUMMARY OF FISCAL 2005 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
          AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION 2002 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

The Company's executive officers participate in the Ameritrade Holding
Corporation 2002 Management Incentive Plan. This shareholder approved plan is
based on the achievement of key corporate performance metrics and is intended to
be qualified under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in order to
maximize tax deductibility for the Company, while providing strong incentive for
goal achievement at the highest levels of the organization. Each year the
Compensation Committee establishes the performance goals that must be achieved
for awards under the plan, identifies eligible participants, and establishes
target incentive percentages for each participant. For fiscal year 2005, the
Compensation Committee identified eligible participants and determined that the
performance criteria will be based on the Company's earnings per share ("EPS"),
and established two formulas that permit the determination of different
components of each participant's bonus award, subject to the CEO's
recommendation to the Compensation Committee to award a lesser amount. Under the
first component, if the performance criteria up to specified levels are reached,
the bonus award is paid in cash and if the performance criteria above specified
levels are reached, the bonus award for these excess levels is paid in
restricted stock units. If restricted stock units are awarded, they will be
vested immediately; however the participant is required to hold the units for at
least three years. Under the second component, if the performance criteria meet
or exceed the specified level, a cash award not to exceed $2 million in the
aggregate may be paid. The Compensation Committee, on December 3, 2004, approved
the aforementioned Management Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2005.
#### George Peters, *Appellant, v.*Andrew Peters and others, *Respondents.*

Decree affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J..
#### Owen D. Phelps, *Respondent, v.*Ella S. Davis, *as Executrix, etc., Appellant.*

— Order modified by allowing defense of statute of limitations to be interposed on complying with terms of the order as to costs, otherwise order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 1 0 6 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. C A R L O S T O R R E S

- S A L D I V A R , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 6 4

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , D E N N I S , a n d C L E M E N T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t C a r l o s T o r r e s S a l d i v a r h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e

w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. T o r r e s - S a l d i v a r h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,
a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 26 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10106 Document: 00511274633 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010