alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Autoimmunity Program Project.
    Date: August 14, 2007.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kenneth E. Santora, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Room 3146, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-2605, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#69021a5b585f0029070001470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7bca4e5e6e1be97b9bebff9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    July 17, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3588 Filed 7-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Henry Bruns, *Appellant, v.*The Stewart Manufacturing Company, Respondents.—

Order modified by striking out of the previous order so much thereof as removed receiver Dick and substituted Nealis in his place, and reversed in so far as it removed Dick and appointed Miller receiver, with costs to appellant, payable out of any fund that may hereafter come to his hands. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
#### Hughes, *Ap't, v.*Smith, *Adm'r, Ap’ee.*

An appeal from a probate decree allowing an administrator’s account, stating tbe appellant’s interest to be that of a surety upon the bond » of the guardian of tbe minor heirs of the deceased, and a purchaser of some of the estate of the deceased, without stating facts showing that the appellant’s suretyship and purchase give him an interest that may be concluded by the decree, is insufficient.

Aepeau, from a decree of the probate court, allowing the account of the appellee, as administrator *de bonis non on*the estate of Henry Evans, deceased. The interest of the appellant as stated in the appeal ivas, that he was surety on the bond of the guardian of the minor heirs of the deceased, and had purchased a portion of the assets of the deceased. Motion to dismiss.

*Bodge,*for the appellant.

*312Smith, for the appellee.

Stanley, J.

The right to appeal from the decrees of the probate court is granted to those only whose interests may be concluded thereby. Gen. Laws, *c.*207, s. 1.

The interest of the appellant, as stated in the appeal, does not state facts which bring it within the’ provisions of the statute.

*Appeal dismissed?.*

All concurred.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.11 Supplemental Report--H.R. 1062]
[Page 891]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.11  supplemental report--h.r. 1062

  Mr. LEACH, by unanimous consent and direction of the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services, pursuant to rule XI, filed a 
supplemental report to House Report 104-127 which accompanied the bill 
(H.R. 1062) to enhance competition in the financial services industry by 
providing a prudential framework for the affiliation of banks, 
securities firms, and other financial service providers.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40406 Conference Calendar

PAUL STURGEON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus J.D. MADER, Captain, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-99-CV-725

-------------------- October 17, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Paul Sturgeon, Texas prisoner # 689133, challenges the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and Edwards v. Balisok , 520 U.S. 641 (1997). He has failed to show the denial of a constitutional right. See Madison v. Parker , 104 F.3d 765, 767- 68 (5th Cir. 1997); Malchi v. Thaler , 211 F.3d 953, 958-59 (5th Cir. 2000). Because Sturgeon has failed to show that theNo. 00-40406 -2- district court erred in dismissing his civil rights complaint, the judgment is AFFIRMED. Sturgeon has also filed motions for the appointment of counsel on appeal and for leave to file a supplemental brief. These motions are DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending February 18, 2012

|Filer                | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|ARKANSAS COUNTY BANK | Member         | Arkansas County Bank, DeWitt, Arkansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                  | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:           | Not applicable
|Federal Register:    | Not applicable
|ARVEST BANK          | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 13301 Crystal Hill Road, North Little Rock, Arkansas.                 | Newspaper:03/01/2012Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:           | 03/01/2012    
|Federal Register:    | Not applicable
|ARVEST BANK          | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at the Southwest Corner of Highway 51 and Highway 69, Wagoner, Oklahoma. | Newspaper:03/01/2012Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:           | 03/01/2012    
|Federal Register:    | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The People of the State of New York, *v.*The Universal Life Insurance Company.

— Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion

*Per Ouriam.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 16 (Thursday, January 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 19, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control 
Association (``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Blaupunkt GmbH, Hildesheim, GERMANY; 
Chinachip Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC 
OF CHINA; Commtech Technology Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd., Macau, 
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Dailystar Technology Limited, Hong Kong, 
HONG KONG-CHINA; Dongguan SIMON Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdon, 
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Dvation Co., Ltd., Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 
KOREA; GM Records Marek Grela, Warsaw, POLAND; Le Hong Po Company 
Limited, Hong Kong, HONG KONG-CHINA; Optical Disc Solutions, Inc., 
Richmond, IN; Polar Frog Digital, Scottsdale, AZ; Protocall 
Technologies Incorporated, Commack, NY; Shenzhen Xing Feng Industry 
Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Skypine Electronics 
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen City, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; VTV 
nv, West Vlaanderen, BELGIUM; and Yuban & Co., Taipei, TAIWAN have been 
added as parties to this venture. Also, Toshiba-EMI Limited, Tokyo, 
JAPAN; and Yuxing Electronics Company Limited, Tortola, BRITISH VIRGIN 
ISLANDS have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
21, 2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 27, 2006 (71 FR 63035).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-318 Filed 1-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 130.145 Plan review, update, and recordkeeping procedures. ( a ) For purposes of this part, copy means a hardcopy or an electronic version. Each railroad must: ( 1 ) Maintain a copy of the complete plan at the railroad's principal place of business;
( 2 ) Provide a copy of the core plan and the appropriate response zone appendix to each qualified individual and alternate; and
( 3 ) Provide a copy of the information summary to each dispatcher in response zones identified in the plan.
( b ) Each railroad must include procedures to review the plan after a discharge requiring the activation of the plan in order to evaluate and record the plan's effectiveness.
( c ) Each railroad must update its plan to address new or different conditions or information. In addition, each railroad must review its plan in full at least every 5 years from the date of the last approval.
( d ) If changes to the plans are made, updated copies of the plan must be provided to every individual referenced under paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) If new or different operating conditions or information would substantially affect the implementation of the response plan, the railroad must immediately modify its plan to address such a change and must submit the change to PHMSA within 90 days in accordance with § 130.111. Examples of changes in operating conditions or information that would substantially affect a railroad's response plan are: ( 1 ) Establishment of a new railroad route, including an extension of an existing railroad route, construction of a new track, or obtaining trackage rights over a route not covered by the previously approved plan used for trains which require a comprehensive plan in accordance with § 130.100(a);
( 2 ) The name of the Oil Spill Removal Organization;
( 3 ) Emergency response procedures;
( 4 ) The qualified individual;
( 5 ) A change in the NCP or an ACP that has significant impact on the equipment appropriate for response activities (e.g., identification of ESAs as described by § 130.115);
( 6 ) A change in the type of oil transported, if the type affects the required response resources (e.g., a change from crude oil to gasoline); and
( 7 ) Any other information relating to circumstances that may affect full implementation of the plan.
( f ) If PHMSA determines that a change to a response plan does not meet the requirements of this part, PHMSA will notify the operator of any alleged deficiencies, and provide the railroad with an opportunity to respond—including an opportunity for an informal conference—to any proposed plan revisions, as well as an opportunity to correct any deficiencies.
( g ) A railroad that disagrees with a determination that proposed revisions to a plan are deficient may petition PHMSA for reconsideration within 30 days from the date of receipt of PHMSA's notice. After considering all relevant material presented in writing or at an informal conference, PHMSA will notify the railroad of its final decision. The railroad must comply with the final decision within 30 days of issuance, unless PHMSA allows additional time.
MEMORANDUM TO RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with Robert Weaver on Proposed Revisions to the Water Quality

Standards Regulation.

DATE: Tuesday, June 28, 2011

TIME: 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM

Participants:

 EPA HQ: Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, 

 Robert (“Bob”) Weaver, Kelly & Weaver

Summary of discussion points/requests for information from Bob Weaver:

 Requested something in writing from the Agency that states that the length of a compliance 

schedule is not limited by the permit term

o Shari Barash sent an email on 6/29/11 forwarding EPA’s CWA section 303(c) action 

letters on Indiana’s CSO Rule and referenced letter (Nov. 2006 letter to California 

State Water Resource Board)

 Requested a response on whether states can do something more stringent than federal 

regulations for variances and compliance schedules. Shari Barash sent an email response on 

7/12/11 stating: “Under CWA 510 a state may adopt or enforce "any standard or limitation 

respecting discharges of pollutants" or "any requirement respecting control or abatement of 

pollution" unless it is "less stringent" than a federal standard/limitation in effect under the 

CWA. Since variances are considered standards and the term "effluent limitation" includes 

"schedule of compliance," a state could adopt a more stringent variance or compliance 

schedule provision than allowed under federal minimum requirements (if their state law 

allows it).”

 Requested that EPA consider including a link in the proposal to revise 40 CFR 131 to the 

water quality management planning sections in 40 CFR 130.

 Discussed his desire for “implementation schedules” for attaining the whole water quality 

standard (akin to the idea of “Restoration Standards” in the Florida Inland Waters Nutrient 

Proposed Rulemaking).

 Suggested that EPA survey the states on what they are doing in their antidegradation policies 

and implementation procedures and place that information in the public record for the 

proposal rule.

 Requested a copy of the “Variance Compendium”
Release dates | 
    Full version (22 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending February 6, 2010

---





## Bank Branches, Domestic

|
|

## 

|
|

## Bank Holding Companies

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

## Change in Bank Control

|
|

## Extensions of Time

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.203 Non-bulk packagings for liquid hazardous materials in Packing Group III. ( a ) When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a liquid hazardous material be packaged under this section, only non-bulk packagings prescribed in this section may be used for its transportation. Each packaging must conform to the general packaging requirements of subpart B of part 173, to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group I, II or III performance level, and to the requirements of the special provisions of column 7 of the § 172.101 table.
( b ) The following combination packagings are authorized: *Outer packagings:* Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Plywood drum: 1D Fiber drum: 1G Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Wooden barrel: 2C2 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Steel box: 4A Aluminum box: 4B Natural wood box: 4C1 or 4C2 Plywood box: 4D Reconstituted wood box: 4F Fiberboard box: 4G Expanded plastic box: 4H1 Solid plastic box: 4H2 Metal box other than steel or aluminum: 4N *Inner packagings:* Glass or earthenware receptacles Plastic receptacles Metal receptacles Glass ampoules
( c ) The following single packagings are authorized:
Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Fiber drum: 1G (with liner) Wooden barrel: 2C1 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, fiber or plastic drum: 6HA1, 6HB1, 6HG1 or 6HH1 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, wooden, plywood or fiberboard box: 6HA2, 6HB2, 6HC, 6HD2 or 6HG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum or fiber drum: 6PA1, 6PB1, or 6PG1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum, wooden or fiberboard box: 6PA2, 6PB2, 6PC or 6PG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in solid or expanded plastic packaging: 6PH1 or 6PH2 Plastic receptacle in plywood drum: 6HD1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in plywood drum or wickerwork hamper: 6PD1 or 6PD2 Cylinders, as prescribed for any compressed gas, except for Specifications 8 and 3HT
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52643, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66271, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 173-241, 59 FR 67518, Dec. 29, 1994; Amdt. 173-261, 62 FR 24734, May 6, 1997; 78 FR 1089, Jan. 7, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

October 1-2, 2007.

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hotel Park City, 2001 Park Avenue, Park City, Utah 84068.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: July 9, 2007.

James Ishida,

Senior Attorney Advisor, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 07-3469 Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
See Exhibit G.
Inc., a seaplane leasing company in St. Croix






to Aug. 2011

Sept. 2011 to present Director of Operations, City Wings, Inc.

and member of the board of directors
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.6 Review Panel]
[Page 632]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.6  review panel

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. INGLIS, laid before the House the 
following communication, which was read as follows:

                                         House of Representatives,

                                 Committee on House Oversight,

                                      Washington, DC, May 1, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to House Rule 51, clause 7, I 
     have appointed the Honorable Vernon J. Ehlers as chairman of 
     the review panel established by that Rule for the 104th 
     Congress.
           Best regards,
                                                      Bill Thomas,
                                                         Chairman.
```
#### In the Matter of Adelaide Clement.

— Motion for reargument denied.
§ 178.350 Specification 7A; general packaging, Type A. ( a ) Each packaging must meet all applicable requirements of subpart B of part 173 of this subchapter and be designed and constructed so that it meets the requirements of §§ 173.403, 173.410, 173.412, 173.415 and 173.465 of this subchapter for Type A packaging.
( b ) Each Specification 7A packaging must be marked on the outside “USA DOT 7A Type A.”
( c ) Each Specification 7A packaging must comply with the requirements of §§ 178.2 and 178.3. In § 178.3(a)(2) the term “packaging manufacturer” means the person certifying that the package meets all requirements of this section.
[Amdt. 178-109, 60 FR 50336, Sept. 28, 1995; 60 FR 54409, Oct. 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 3696, Jan. 26, 2004; 70 FR 56099, Sept. 23, 2005; 79 FR 40618, July 11, 2014]