alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Margaret M. Wright, as Testamentary Trustee under the Will of James Nisbet, Deceased, Appellant. Margaret E. Callen, Respondent.

*Matter of*Wright, 139 App. Div. 1, affirmed.

(Argued September 28, 1910;

decided October 18, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered J une 3, 1910, which reversed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the trustee herein and directed the entry of a decree in accordance with its opinion. Also, motion to dismiss said appeal upon the grounds, That the said Appellate Division having unanimously reversed the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of New *570York county upon the law and the facts, and having itself determined the facts pursuant to section 2586 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this court has no jurisdiction to review the order of June 3, 1910, and the decree entered thereon; and that the order of June 24, 1910, appealed from, which denied the motion of Margaret M. Wright, as trustee, for an order remitting this proceeding to the Surrogate’s Court for a new trial or rehearing, was a discretion ary order of said Appellate Division made pursuant to section 2587 of the Code of Civil Procedure and not appealable to this court.

*Francis B. Wood*for appellant.

*Godfrey Goldmarlc*for respondent.

Decree of Appellate Division affirmed, with costs, and motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen,Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, IIiscooic and Chase, JJ..
§ 1582.1 Scope. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part includes requirements for the following persons. Specific sections in this part provide detailed requirements. ( 1 ) Each passenger railroad carrier.
( 2 ) Each public transportation agency.
( 3 ) Each operator of a rail transit system that is not operating on track that is part of the general railroad system of transportation, including heavy rail transit, light rail transit, automated guideway, cable car, inclined plane, funicular, and monorail systems.
( 4 ) Each tourist, scenic, historic, and excursion rail owner/operator, whether operating on or off the general railroad system of transportation.
( b ) This part does not apply to a ferry system required to conduct training pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 70103.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.172 Aircraft hydraulic power unit fuel tank. Aircraft hydraulic power unit fuel tanks containing a mixture of anhydrous hydrazine and monomethyl hydrazine (M86 fuel) and designed for installation as complete units in aircraft are excepted from the specification packaging requirements of this subchapter when they conform to either of the following conditions: ( a ) The unit must consist of an aluminum pressure vessel made from tubing and having welded heads. Primary containment of the fuel within this vessel must consist of a welded aluminum bladder having a maximum internal volume of 46 L (12 gallons). The outer vessel must have a minimum design gauge pressure of 1,275 kPa (185 psig) and a minimum burst gauge pressure of 2,755 kPa (400 psig). Each vessel must be leak-checked during manufacture and before shipment and must be found leakproof. The complete inner unit must be securely packed in non-combustible cushioning material, such as vermiculite, in a strong outer tightly closed metal packaging which will adequately protect all fittings. Maximum quantity of fuel per primary containment and package is 42 L (11 gallons); or
( b ) The unit must consist of an aluminum pressure vessel. Primary containment of the fuel within this vessel must consist of a welded hermetically sealed fuel compartment with an elastomeric bladder having a maximum internal volume of 46 L (12 gallons). The pressure vessel must have a minimum design gauge pressure of 5,170 kPa (750 psig). Each vessel must be leak-checked during manufacture and before shipment and must be found leakproof, and must be securely packed in non-combustible cushioning material, such as vermiculite, in a strong outer tightly closed metal packaging which will adequately protect all fittings. Maximum quantity of fuel per primary containment and package is 42 L (11 gallons).
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52643, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 45380, Aug. 28, 2001; 87 FR 44993, July 26, 2022]
For international travelers departing from India:

If rice is found in passenger baggage 

arriving in the United States, it will be 

confiscated and destroyed. When you arrive 

in the United States, you must declare all food and 

agricultural items on your Customs Declaration 

Form and verbally to 

officers or agriculture 

specialists with U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Passengers who fail to 

declare agricultural items may be subject to penalties of up to 

$1,000 or more per violation. 

Khapra Beetle: A Devastating Agricultural Pest

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits these agricultural items because they could be harboring 

the Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium). This insect is one of the world’s most destructive pests of grain 

products and seed. In response to increasing numbers of Khapra beetle detections in passenger baggage from 

countries where Khapra beetle is known to occur, USDA issued Federal Orders on July 8, 2011, that prohibit rice 

from entering the United States in passenger baggage and non-commercial packages sent via international mail 

or express courier.

Please help to keep the Khapra beetle out of the United States. Simply leave these items behind and avoid 

confiscations, fines, and penalties.

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 2090

Issued August 2011 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

USDA/APHIS, Indira Singh 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium)

Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Development Archive, 

Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Development, Bugwood.org

Rice from India and 

other countries where 

the Khapra beetle exists 

or is known to occur 

is prohibited from 

entering the United States.

USDA/APHIS, Indira Singh
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report, dated
February 7, 2001, on the consolidated financial statements of Capital
Directions, Inc., which appears on Page 12 of Capital Directions, Inc.'s 2000
Annual Report to Shareholders, and is incorporated by reference in the Capital
Directions, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000, in the registration statement on Form S-8 for the Capital Directions, Inc.
Incentive Stock Option Plan.



                                              /s/  Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 23, 2001





                                       21
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.19 Unfinished Business--Approval of the Journal]
[Page 651]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.19  unfinished business--approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaTOURETTE, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the question on agreeing to the 
Chair's approval of the Journal of Wednesday, May 3, 1995.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to the Chair's approval of said Journal?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaTOURETTE, announced that the yeas had 
it.
  Mr. SALMON demanded a recorded vote on agreeing to the Chair's 
approval of said Journal, which demand was supported by one-fifth of a 
quorum, so a recorded vote was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

Yeas

364

It was decided in the

Nays

40

affirmative

Answered present

2
```
#### William S. Williams, *Appellant, v.*Daniel T. Hedges, *Respondent, Impleaded, etc.*

— Order modified by reducing allowance to-each respondent to the sum of $500, and affirmed as modified, without costs.
PHYSICAL ITEM REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE00724.A14

SEE VISIT THE DOCKET CENTER
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1874

AN ACT

To modify the boundaries of the Talladega National

Forest, Alabama.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1874

AN ACT

To modify the boundaries of the Talladega National Forest,

Alabama.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1874 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF TALLADEGA NATIONAL FOREST.

2 (a) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—The exterior bound3 aries of the Talladega National Forest is hereby modified

4 to include the following described lands:

5 Huntsville Meridian, Township 17 South,

Range 8 East, Section 34, NE1⁄4, SW1 6 ⁄4, and

S1⁄2NW1 7 ⁄4, Cleburne County, containing 399.40

8 acres, more or less.

9 Huntsville Meridian, Township 13 South,

Range 9 East, Section 28, SE1 10 ⁄4, Calhoun County,

11 containing 160.00 acres, more or less.

12 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—(1) Subject to valid existing

13 rights, all Federal lands described under subsection (a)

14 are hereby added to and shall be administered as part of

15 the Talladega National Forest, and the Secretary of the

16 Interior shall transfer, without reimbursement, adminis17 trative jurisdiction over such lands to the Secretary of Ag18 riculture.

19 (2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to af20 fect the validity of or the terms and conditions of any ex21 isting right-of-way, easement, lease, license, or permit on

22 lands transferred by subsection (a), except that such lands

23 shall be administered by the Forest Service. Reissuance

24 of any authorization shall be in accordance with the laws

25 and regulations generally applying to the Forest Service,

26 and the change of jurisdiction over such lands resulting
3

•HR 1874 EH

1 from the enactment of this Act shall not constitute a

2 ground for the denial of renewal or reissuance of such au3 thorization.

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: revnancyaa@gmail.com [mailto:revnancyaa@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Anderson 

3653 Lloyd Terrace 

San Diego, CA 92117
#### Minnie Fuchs, *Respondent, v.*Michael Meyhog, Appellant.—

Papers not submitted.
§ 78.27-1 Improper use prohibited. ( a ) No person shall flash or cause to be flashed the rays of a search light or other blinding light onto the bridge or into the pilothouse of any vessel under way.
( b ) [Reserved]
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

JUDY C. PARKER

Justice

LAWRENCE M. DOSS

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

August 27, 2020

Hillary Netardus

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 50652

Amarillo, TX 79159

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Russell Thorum

Assistant District Attorney

P.O. Box 1592

Pampa, TX 79066

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-19-00257-CR, 07-19-00258-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 5150, 5151

Style: Brandon Edward Standerfer v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. TEX.

R. APP. P. 48.

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on 

file with this Court, if any, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case 

or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court.

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

Vivian Long, Clerk

cc: Honorable Steven R. Emmert (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Sherri Jones (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:April 15, 2009By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
98-2494.

#### State v. Appling.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72719. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending May 18, 2013

|Filer                                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------------------ | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY BANK & TRUST COMPANY | * Branch       | North Shore Community Bank and Trust, Wilmette, Illinois, to establish a branch located at 2814 West Fullerton Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. | Newspaper:06/03/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                 | 06/03/2013    
|Federal Register:                          | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFirst Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the "Company') on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date       August 2, 2005                                                                                                    | /s/ T. Randy Stevens                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | T. Randy Stevens,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |                                                         |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | /s/ Patricia N.  McClanahan                             |
| Date       August 2, 2005                                                  | Patricia N.  McClanahan, Chief Financial Officer        |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1098

MADHU VERMA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL A. STAEVEN,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

REBECCA ANNE HERR,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:22-cv-01130-DKC)

Submitted: November 21, 2023 Decided: November 27, 2023

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Madhu Verma, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1098 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Madhu Verma appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s 

order granting Daniel A. Staeven’s motion for entry of judgment. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

Verma v. Staeven, No. 8:22-cv-01130-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 22, 2022). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1098 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections
1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

|1. | Patrick J. Mitchell is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
          Ascent Assurance, Inc. (the Company).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Cynthia B. Koenig is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
          the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | To the best of our knowledge:
|-- | -----------------------------

| | (A) | The Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
               accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
               Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 5, 2004

| | /s/ Patrick J. MitchellPatrick J. Mitchell Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
| | /s/ Cynthia B. KoenigCynthia B. Koenig Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Ferruccio A. Vivanti, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; William Greenbaum, as Executor, Respondent.

*Matter of Vivanti,*138 App. Div. 281, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 17, 1910;

decided November 29, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *514May 6, 1910, which reversed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax on the estate of Ferruccio A. Vivanti, deceased.

*T. S. Jenkins*for appellant.

*Walter M. Rosebault*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
<Page>


                                  EXHIBIT 10.11



                SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


         Effective January 1, 2004, compensation for independent members of the
Board of Directors of Pressure BioSciences, Inc. (the "Company") was set at a
monthly stipend of $2,000, of which $1,000 is compensation for attending full
Board meetings (whether telephonic or in-person) and $1,000 is compensation for
attending committee meetings. There is no limit to the number of full Board or
committee meetings called. No independent member of the Board of Directors will
receive more than $2,000 per month regardless of the number of meetings
attended. In addition to cash compensation, each independent member of the Board
of Directors will also receive a one-time grant of 10,000 fully vested,
non-qualified stock options, as well as an annual grant of 5,000 fully vested,
nonqualified stock options. The initial set of options is granted as soon as
feasible upon joining the Board and the annual options grant will be awarded on
the first business day of March each year. Cash compensation will be paid in the
first payroll of each fiscal quarter.