4526 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

[FEMA–1675–DR] 

Kansas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of 

a Major Disaster Declaration 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice 

of a major disaster declaration for the 

State of Kansas (FEMA–1675–DR), dated 

January 7, 2007, and related 

determinations. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 22, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2705. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice 

of a major disaster declaration for the 

State of Kansas is hereby amended to 

include the following areas among those 

areas determined to have been adversely 

affected by the catastrophe declared a 

major disaster by the President in his 

declaration of January 7, 2007: 

Cheyenne, Clark, Decatur, Edwards, Ellis, 

Finney, Ford, Gove, Graham, Grant, Gray, 

Greeley, Hamilton, Haskell, Hodgeman, 

Jewell, Kearny, Kiowa, Lane, Logan, Meade, 

Morton, Ness, Norton, Osborne, Pawnee, 

Phillips, Rawlins, Rooks, Rush, Russell, 

Scott, Seward, Sheridan, Sherman, Smith, 

Stanton, Stevens, Thomas, Trego, Wallace, 

and Wichita Counties for Public Assistance 

Categories C–G (already designated for Public 

Assistance Categories A and B [debris 

removal and emergency protective measures], 

including direct Federal assistance.) 

Cheyenne, Decatur, Greeley, Logan, 

Morton, Rawlins, Sherman, Stanton, Thomas, 

Wallace, and Wichita Counties for emergency 

protective measures (Category B), including 

snow removal, under the Public Assistance 

program for any continuous 48-hour period 

during or proximate to the incident period 

(already designated for Public Assistance 

Categories A and B [debris removal and 

emergency protective measures], including 

direct Federal assistance.) 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic 

Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used 

for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 

Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora 

Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 

Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services 

Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 

Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 

Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and 

Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and 

Households Disaster Housing Operations; 

97.050, Individuals and Households 

Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public 

Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 

Grant Program.) 

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency 

Management and Director of FEMA. 

[FR Doc. E7–1455 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

Intent To Request Approval From OMB 

of One New Public Collection of 

Information: Pipeline Security 

Awareness (CD–1) Effectiveness 

Assessment 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) invites public 

comment on a new information 

collection requirement abstracted below 

that we will submit to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

approval in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

DATES: Send your comments by April 2, 

2007. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed 

or delivered to Katrina Kletzly, 

Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief 

Counsel, TSA–2, Transportation 

Security Administration, 601 South 

12th Street, Arlington, VA 22202–4220. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katrina Kletzly at the above address, or 

by telephone (571) 227–1995 or 

facsimile (571) 227–1381. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. Therefore, in preparation for 

OMB review and approval of the 

following information collection, TSA is 

soliciting comments to—

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

Purpose of Data Collection 

As prescribed by the President in 

Homeland Security Presidential 

Directive 7 (HSPD–7), the Department of 

Homeland Security (DHS) was tasked to 

protect our nation’s critical 

infrastructure and key resources (CI/ 

KR). Through the National 

Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP), 

DHS gives a guidance and direction as 

to how the Nation will secure its 

infrastructure. Furthermore, HSPD–7 

and the NIPP assigned the responsibility 

for infrastructure security in the 

transportation sector to TSA. To this 

effect, the NIPP further tasks each sector 

to build security partnerships, set 

security goals and to measure their 

effectiveness. Through its Corporate 

Security Review Program, TSA has 

conducted reviews of numerous 

pipeline systems in which various 

aspects of each company’s security 

program are analyzed. Through this 

review process, TSA has determined 

that improved security awareness 

training for pipeline company 

employees would be useful. The OMB 

control number assigned to the 

Corporate Security Review Program is 

1652–0036. To increase the security 

awareness levels across the pipeline 

industry, TSA plans to develop and 

distribute a Security Awareness 

Training compact disk (CD–1) to 

interested pipeline companies. In order 

to measure the effectiveness of CD–1 on 

raising company security awareness, 

TSA will solicit voluntary feedback 

from pipeline companies seeking to 

utilize the CD–1. 

In order to participate, interested 

companies may respond to TSA’s 

announcements regarding the CD–1 

availability and ordering instructions 

through all applicable pipeline industry 

Web sites. The CD–1 training will be 

available to all pipeline companies 

upon request to TSA. Participation in 

the feedback survey will also be 

voluntary to those pipeline companies 

that requested and received the CD. 

TSA will collect the feedback 

regarding CD–1 performance via online 

survey, which will be managed by a 

contracted third-party survey company. 

The survey results will be used to guide 

TSA on future pipeline transportation 

security initiatives. TSA plans to 

conduct the data collection over a twoto three-year period in order to allow for 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices 4527 

maximum distribution and use of CD–

1 throughout the industry, and for 

participating companies to complete full 

training cycles. 

Description of Data Collection 

TSA will ask participating companies 

that complete the Security Awareness 

Training CD–1, to log on to a TSAmanaged secure Web site to provide 

feedback on the effectiveness of the 

training. 

Respondent companies may respond 

with feedback in one of two ways: (1) 

They may choose to submit one 

subjective, corporate response as to the 

employee participation levels or 

effectiveness of the CD–1 (i.e., the CD–

1 significantly increased the security 

awareness levels for a majority of 

Company X’s employees); or (2) they 

may provide objective information 

based on their company’s own survey of 

its employees. For metrics purposes, 

TSA will also request that participating 

companies provide the total number of 

company employees, the number of 

employees who have completed the CD–

1 training, and the numbers of projected 

employees that will complete the 

training in the future. In many cases, a 

single company may own more than one 

pipeline transmission or local 

distribution system, thus, a single CD–

1 and corresponding effectiveness 

survey responses may represent more 

than one individual pipeline system. In 

order to discern the total number of 

pipeline companies utilizing the CD–1, 

TSA will inquire as to the number of 

individual pipeline systems that will be 

using the CD–1, in the event a parent 

company is requesting the CD. However, 

because participation in the CD–1 

training and providing feedback in 

voluntary (that is, some companies that 

may utilize the CD–1 may not provide 

feedback), the TSA metrics will be 

based solely on companies that provide 

feedback. 

In order for interested companies to 

submit information, TSA will set up a 

separate file for each company on the 

secure Web site into which each 

company can provide feedback. TSA 

will provide each company or 

individual pipeline system with a 

password in order to access their 

individual company or system file. 

Companies/individual systems may 

access and update the information 

contained within their file at any time. 

The name of the participation company 

or point or contact information will be 

collected only for the purpose of setting 

up the company feedback file and for 

identify verification when companies 

log onto the Web site. 

Use of Results 

The primary use of this information is 

to allow TSA to assess the effect of the 

CD–1 project on raising the baseline 

level of security awareness within the 

pipeline industry. The secondary 

purpose of this information is for TSA 

to obtain, based on individual company 

input, an indication of CD–1 user 

participation and employee 

participation levels throughout the 

pipeline industry. 

Frequency 

Most companies administer their 

security awareness training curriculum 

on an annual or biannual cycle. 

Therefore, a company would provide 

TSA sufficient feedback approximately 

every two years. Typically, companies 

will generate quarterly or annual reports 

on employee training progress. Thus, 

companies may submit updated 

feedback between one and four times 

per year, which TSA equates to an 

average frequency for this collection of 

two times per year. The time companies 

expend to respond to this collection will 

vary slightly depending on whether a 

company chooses to submit an overall 

company subjective opinion response 

provided by a knowledgeable corporate 

official, or an objective response based 

on results of its own training feedback 

survey. However, if a company chooses 

to submit one overall company opinion, 

it is likely that a person with some 

familiarity with the company’s security 

posture will be responsible for 

providing the feedback survey. 

Regardless of whether a company 

submits an objective response based on 

the results of its own training course 

survey, or an opinion of one corporate 

official, the only time expenditure 

required would result from 

electronically entering the requested 

information on the TSA survey Web 

site. This is because the information 

gathered will already be in the 

possession of the company and 

therefore, impart no additional burden 

on the respondent. 

Out of approximately 2,200 

individual pipeline companies, TSA 

estimates that on an annual basis an 

average of 300 companies will provide 

feedback on the CD–1. TSA estimates 

the average hour burden per response 

per pipeline company or system will be 

approximately 20 minutes. Assuming 

that, on average, a company will update 

their feedback twice per year, TSA 

estimates the total annual hour burden 

will be 40 minutes per pipeline 

company or system. Therefore, TSA 

estimates the total annual hour burden 

will be approximately 200 hours per 

year for all pipeline industry 

participants [300 companies × 40 

minutes = 200 hours]. 

Dated: Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on 

January 23, 2007. 

Peter Pietra, 

Director of Privacy Policy and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 07–369 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[AA–6678–A2, AA–6678–F, AA–6678–K, AA–

6678–L; AK–964–1410–KC–P] 

Alaska Native Claims Selection 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of decision approving 

lands for conveyance. 

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 

2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an 

appealable decision approving lands for 

conveyance pursuant to the Alaska 

Native Claims Settlement Act will be 

issued to Levelock Natives, Limited. 

The lands are in the vicinity of 

Levelock, Alaska, and are located in: 

Seward Meridian, Alaska 

T. 10 S., R. 44 W., 

Sec. 35. 

Containing 640.00 acres. 

T. 11 S., R. 44 W., 

Sec. 20. 

Containing 640.00 acres. 

T. 12 S., R. 44 W., 

Sec. 18. 

Containing 374.95 acres. 

T. 13 S., R. 44 W., 

Sec. 3. 

Containing 496.88 acres. 

T. 13 S., R. 45 W., 

Secs. 25, 35 and 36. 

Containing 1,881.97 acres. 

T. 12 S., R. 46 W., 

Secs. 12 and 13; 

Secs. 23 to 26, inclusive; 

Sec. 36. 

Containing 4,446.85 acres. 

T. 13 S., R. 46 W., 

Secs. 3, 4, and 9. 

Containing 1,920.00 acres. 

Aggregating 10,400.65 acres. 

The subsurface estate in these lands 

will be conveyed to Bristol Bay Native 

Corporation when the surface estate is 

conveyed to Levelock Natives, Limited. 

Notice of the decision will also be 

published four times in the Bristol Bay 

Times. 

DATES: The time limits for filing an 

appeal are: 

1. Any party claiming a property 

interest which is adversely affected by 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES