alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARY E. ELSON, Appellant, *v.*GEORGE MURRAY, Jr., and JOHN J. MURRAY, Respondents.

*Practice*— *appeal to the County Court*— security *upon*— when *a new surety wdX be required to execute the undertaking wltere the surety thereonhas with the appeUanfs knowledge sworn falsely as to his pecuniary responsibility.*

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Cortland county, directing the appellant to furnish a good surety on her undertaking upon an appeal to that court within a specified time, or that in default thereof her appeal should be dismissed. The motion to dismiss the appeal was made upon the ground “ of the insufficiency and irresponsibility, and insolvency of appellant’s surety.” •

The court at General Term said: “ A judgment was recovered against the plaintiff for costs in a Justices’ Court, July 6, 1880. On the 9th day of July, 1880, she appealed to the County Court and gave her husband as security. He justified on that day before the county judge in the sum of $200, and the county judge approved the surety.

*“*It now appears by his testimony that at that time he was not worth a dollar, and that he knew he was not worth $200. It further appears that on the 14th day of May, 1880,' he had been examined in proceedings supplementary in the presence of his wife, the present plaintiff, and had testified that he had no property of any kind. These facts are not denied by her. On this proof the county judge dismissed the appeal, unless the appellant should file .an undertaking under section 3050, Code Civil Procedure. ‘

“ This is not a case where a surety has become insolvent after sign*537ing the bond or undertaking. It is the case of a plain fraud on the court, effected by perjury. The plaintiff knew when the surety signed the undertaking that he had no property. Her attorney suggested to the surety that he should execute the undertaking. Thus, through her attorney, she procured the undertaking to be made. The surety knew that he was making a false affidavit, as he now says; and no one denies this.

“ The court properly dismissed the appeal. In a case of such fraud the court was not required to give leave to file another undertaking. But that privilege was granted, and the plaintiff can avail herself thereof, if she chooses to do so.”

*0.*Porter, for the appellant.

*F. Hatch,*for the respondents.

Opinion

*Per Gwriam.*

Present — Learned, P. J.; Boardman and Bocees, J J.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1451 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1451

   To provide authority for the extension of nondiscriminatory (most-
              favored-nation) trade treatment to Cambodia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 1995

Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself and Mr. Hamilton) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide authority for the extension of nondiscriminatory (most-
              favored-nation) trade treatment to Cambodia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) applies to 
the products of Cambodia.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--General Note 3(b) of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking 
``Kampuchea''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 1(a) and the amendment made by section 1(b) apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption 
when an agreement between the United States of America and the Kingdom 
of Cambodia on trade relations and intellectual property rights 
protection enters into force.

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL AND PRESIDENTIAL REVIEW OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

    (a) If Congress mandates such action through legislation the 
President shall revoke most-favored-nation for Cambodia, otherwise.
    (b) The President of the United States may suspend most-favored-
nation treatment for Cambodia if they fail to meet a standard set by 
the President.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BROAD
NATIONAL BANCORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,415
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                42,875
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     76,250
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          91,139
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            89,367
<LOANS>                                        291,387
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,634
<DEPOSITS>                                     481,885
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,855
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,677
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 531,634
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,413
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,539
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   730
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,682
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,509
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,521
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,161
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      450
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,914
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,914
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,661
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.95
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,511
<LOANS-PAST>                                       510
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 3,914
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,028
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,531
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      245
<RECOVERIES>                                       172
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,908
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,908
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,094
        

</TABLE>
*Wednesday, February 17, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

98-2615.

#### State ex rel. Howard v. Weiher.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1344. On motion to dismiss and motion for award of reasonable expenses. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., concurs and would also award attorney fees.

Resnick, J., not participating.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1835

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of a hydroelectric project in Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1995

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Ms. FURSE, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of a hydroelectric project in Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR BLUE RIVER

4 PROJECT.

5 (a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding the time period

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

7 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En8 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 3109, the

9 Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for the
2

HR 1835 IH

1 project, extend the time for completion of the construction

2 of the project to the later of—

3 (1) October 31, 2002; or

4 (2) the date that is 1 year after the date on

5 which the Army Corps of Engineers completes con6 struction of water temperature control structures at

7 the Blue River Dam.

8 (b) REPORTS.—The licensee for the project described

9 in subsection (a) shall file with the Federal Energy Regu10 latory Commission, on October 31 of each year until con11 struction of the project is completed, a report on progress

12 toward completion of the project and of water temperature

13 control structures at the Blue River Dam.

Æ
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending February 1, 2014

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|FIRSTBANK         | * Branch       | FirstBank, Lakewood, Colorado, to establish a branch at 1720 Power Road, Mesa, Arizona. | Newspaper:02/12/2014Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:        | 02/12/2014    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|PEOPLES BANK, THE | Member         | The Peoples Bank, Pratt, Kansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.      | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ADAMS B&TC, OGALLALA, NEBRASKA    | 463650 | 09/16/2013 | 01/22/2014     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FIRST ST BK NE, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA | 499453 | 10/15/2013 | 01/20/2014     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending April 13, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending January 12, 2013

----

Bank Branches, DomesticKansas City          Cornerstone Bank, York, Nebraska -- to establish a branch at 211 Winters Avenue, Glenvil.            -Approved, January 8, 2013            St. Louis          Farmers Bank and Trust Company, Blytheville, Arkansas -- to establish a branch at 3644 West State Highway 18, Manila.            -Approved, January 11, 2013            Richmond          Farmers Bank, Windsor, Virginia -- to establish a branch at 28319 Southampton Parkway, Courtland, and to invest in bank premises.            -Approved, January 11, 2013            Dallas          HCSB, a State Banking Association, Plainview, Texas -- to establish a branch at 201 West 6th Street, Plainview.            -Approved, January 11, 2013            Bank Holding CompaniesSan Francisco          Carpenter Bank Partners, Inc., et al., Irvine, California -- modification of certain commitments.            -Granted, January 11, 2013            Minneapolis          First Dakota Financial Corporation, Yankton, South Dakota, and First Dakota National Bank -- waiver of application to acquire Bank 360, Beresford, in connection with its merger with and into First Dakota National Bank, Yankton.            -Granted, January 11, 2013            Banks, State MemberDirector, BS&R          Goldman Sachs Bank USA, New York, New York -- to make certain public welfare investments.            -Approved, December 17, 2012            (A/C)          Change in Bank ControlChicago          Horizon Bancorp, Michigan City, Indiana -- change in bank control of Horizon Bancorp and its subsidiary, Horizon Bank, National Association, Michigan City.            -Permitted, January 9, 2013            Extensions of TimeSan Francisco          FNB Bancorp, South San Francisco, California -- extension to February 13, 2013, to retain control of FNB Bancorp and its subsidiary, First National Bank of Northern California, South San Francisco.            -Granted, January 9, 2013            Secretary          Live Oak Bancshares, Inc., Wilmington, North Carolina -- commenters' requests to extend the comment period on the application to acquire Government Loan Solutions, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio.            -Denied, January 7, 2013            Chicago          Minier Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan w/401(k) Provisions, Minier, Illinois -- extension to April 20, 2013, to increase its ownership of Minier Financial, Inc., Minier, and thereby increase its indirect ownership of First Farmers State Bank.            -Granted, January 9, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 25, 2014

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Godfrey Miller, Appellant, *v.*City of Buffalo, Respondent.

Reported below, 136 App. Div. 914.

(Argued May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 31,1910, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

The motion was made upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was upon the facts, and, therefore, not appealable to the Court of Appeals.

*William, H. Sullivan*for motion.

*Harry D. Sanders*opposed.

*524Motion granted upon payment by appellant of costs, not including costs of argument, and ten dollars costs to respondent for opposing motion ; unless such payment is made within twenty days after service of a copy of this order the appeal is dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
#### Margaretta Remsen and others, Appellants, v. George S. Wheeler, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 13, 1995 (94), Para 94.37 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1133]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.94.37  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. BONO, for today;
  To Mr. FIELDS of Texas, for today
  To Miss COLLINS of Michigan, for today and balance of the week;
  To Mr. TAUZIN, for today;
  To Mr. VOLKMER, for today after 6 p.m.;
  To Mr. WILLIAMS, for today after 8:15 p.m.;
  To Mr. GREENWOOD, for today after 5:00 p.m.; and
  To Mr. HEFNER, for today and balance of the week.
  And then,
```
§ 1.17 OST line of secretarial succession. ( a ) The following officials, in the order indicated, shall act as Secretary of Transportation, in case of the absence or disability of the Secretary, until the absence or disability ceases, or in the case of a vacancy, until a successor is appointed. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by the law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Secretary of Transportation. ( 1 ) Deputy Secretary.
( 2 ) Under Secretary of Transportation for Policy.
( 3 ) General Counsel.
( 4 ) Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs.
( 5 ) Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy.
( 6 ) Assistant Secretary for Governmental Affairs.
( 7 ) Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
( 8 ) Assistant Secretary for Administration.
( 9 ) Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration.
( 10 ) Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.
( 11 ) Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
( 12 ) Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration.
( 13 ) Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration.
( 14 ) Administrator of the Maritime Administration.
( 15 ) Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
( 16 ) Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( 17 ) Administrator of the Research and Innovative Technology Administration.
( 18 ) Administrator of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.
( 19 ) Regional Administrator, Southern Region, Federal Aviation Administration.
( 20 ) Director, Resource Center, Lakewood, Colorado, Federal Highway Administration.
( 21 ) Regional Administrator, Northwest Mountain Region, Federal Aviation Administration.
( b ) Without regard to the foregoing, a person directed to perform the duties of the Secretary pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3347 (the Vacancies Act) shall act as Secretary of Transportation.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?

COM\_2017\_0400\_FIN.ENG.xhtml.1\_EN\_ACT\_part1\_v3.docx


![european flag](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/image/eclogo.jpg)EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 29.6.2017

COM(2017) 400 final

DRAFT General Budget
of the European Union
for the financial year 2018

- General Introduction
- General statement of revenue
- General statement of revenue and expenditure by section

DOCUMENTS

| |
| --- |
| |

DRAFT General Budget

of the European Union

for the financial year 2018

—
   General introduction

—
   General statement of revenue

—
   General statement of revenue and expenditure by section:

   —
   Section 1: European Parliament

—
   Section 2: European Council and Council

 
   —
   Section 3: Commission

—
   Section 4: Court of Justice of the European Union

 
   —
   Section 5: Court of Auditors

—
   Section 6: European Economic and Social Committee

 
   —
   Section 7: Committee of the Regions

—
   Section 8: European Ombudsman

 
   —
   Section 9: European Data Protection Supervisor

 
   —
   Section 10: European External Action Service

<http://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm>

| |
| --- |
| |
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    PHILIP W.
ROIZINPhilip W. Roizin Executive Vice President, Finance and
Administration, Treasurer and Secretary and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: May 2, 2003