alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mary Cato 

<mary.e.cato@gmail.com>

08/06/2010 04:37 PM

To CCG-ONG@EPA

cc

Subj

ect

comments on EPA oil & gas air reg review

I attended an EPA public meeting in Arlington, TX on 8/2/10, and had the following reactions:

1. the regulations should address more than individual pollutants/toxics separately, but their 

impact on people & the environment in combination

2. "energy independence" is becoming a meaningless term - it's my understanding that oil & 

natural gas are produced and sold on worldwide markets, not merely for consumption locally 

(e.g., Arlington/TX/US) - for this reason, I believe it's much more important to protect people & 

the environment around drilling/fracking production processes with strong, enforced regulations 

rather than promote the industry & its profit-driven practices based on a meaningless idea

3. I believe EPA should be more active in promoting development of new technologies that 

would be less toxic through RFPs & funding research, rather than passively relying on what's 

currently available within the industries that have little or no interest in anything other than 

producing the most oil/gas at the least cost to themselves - the recent Gulf oil and West Virginia 

coal mine disasters show what happens when industries are allowed to self-regulate - best 

"available" is not sufficient

Mary Cato

Arlington, TX
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending May 11, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 97.55-5 Warning notice posted. ( a ) As a precaution against any subsequent unintentional re-energizing of the circuits specified above, an appropriate notice shall be posted at the location where the control is effected warning against re-energizing these circuits. Such notice shall remain posted while this bulk cargo remains within the vessel.
§ 176.57 Supervision of handling and stowage. ( a ) Hazardous materials may be handled or stowed on board a vessel only under the direction and observation of a responsible person assigned this duty.
( b ) For a vessel engaged in coastwise voyages, or on rivers, bays, sounds or lakes, including the Great Lakes when the voyage is not foreign-going, the responsible person may be an employee of the carrier and assigned this duty by the carrier, or a licensed officer attached to the vessel and assigned by the master of the vessel.
( c ) For a domestic vessel engaged in a foreign-going or intercoastal voyage, the responsible person must be an officer possessing an unexpired license issued by the USCG and assigned this duty by the master of the vessel.
( d ) For a foreign vessel, the responsible person must be an officer of the vessel assigned this duty by the master of the vessel.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52689, Dec. 21, 1990]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VICORPRestaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 12,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, Kenneth Keymer, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Anthony Carroll, Chief Financial Officer and Chief AdministrativeOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that:
|        | 1)     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | 2)     | the information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| Date:  August 27, 2007 |   | /s/ Kenneth Keymer                                             |   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Kenneth Keymer                                                 |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                        |
|                   |   |                                                           |
|                   |   |                                                           |
| Date: August 27, 2007  |   | /s/ Anthony Carroll                                            |   |
|                   |   | Anthony Carroll                                                |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Chief  Administrative Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to VICORP Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by VICORPRestaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
#### Isaac Burnett v. Charles S. Wright, as Executor, etc.

Motion for reargument denied. Memoranda of decision filed with the clerk.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00037-CR

AMANDA GAYLE HIXON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-02097-CRF-272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amanda Gayle Hixon pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, less 

than one gram, and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. The sentence was suspended 

and Hixon was placed on community supervision for 5 years. The State then filed a 

motion to revoke Hixon’s community supervision and a hearing was held before a 

magistrate. The magistrate revoked the community supervision and Hixon appealed to 

this Court.

Hixon then revised her notice of appeal to request a hearing regarding the 

magistrate’s ruling with the referring district court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 54.1113 
Hixon v. State Page 2

(Vernon 2005). Hixon sent a letter to this Court explaining the circumstances of this 

proceeding and asking the Court to “remove this case, at this time, from appeal.” The 

parties and the trial court agree that the magistrate’s “judgment is not yet final and 

sentence has not yet been pronounced.”

Because there is no final, appealable order, this appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); 26.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 24, 2010

Do not publish

[CR25]
#### § 179.300-14 Attachments not otherwise specified.

Siphon pipes and their couplings on the inside of the tank head and lugs on the outside of the tank head for attaching the valve protective housing must be fusion-welded in place prior to postweld heat treatment. All other fixtures and appurtenances, except as specifically provided for, are prohibited.

[Amdt. 179-10, 36 FR 21355, Nov. 6, 1971]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                         TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Aviall, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

           Date:     August 12, 2003                /s/ Paul E. Fulchino
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Paul E. Fulchino
                                                    Chairman, President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


           Date:     August 12, 2003                /s/ Colin M. Cohen
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Colin M. Cohen
                                                    Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q.
#### § 176.903 Stowage of cotton or vegetable fibers with coal.

Cotton or vegetable fibers being transported on a vessel may not be stowed in the same hold with coal. They may be stowed in adjacent holds if the holds are separated by a tight steel bulkhead and the cotton or vegetable fibers are dunnaged at least 5 cm (2 inches) off the bulkhead. Cotton or vegetable fibers may be stowed in a hold above or below one in which coal is stowed if there is a tight steel intervening deck and all hatch covers are in place and covered with tarpaulins.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending April 3, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John R. Hart, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”);


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.








Date: April 1, 2013





/s/ John R. Hart


John R. Hart


President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 172.606 Carrier information contact. ( a ) Each carrier who transports or accepts for transportation a hazardous material for which a shipping paper is required shall instruct the operator of a motor vehicle, train, aircraft, or vessel to contact the carrier (e.g., by telephone or mobile radio) in the event of an incident involving the hazardous material.
( b ) For transportation by highway, if a transport vehicle, (e.g., a semi-trailer or freight container-on-chassis) contains hazardous material for which a shipping paper is required and the vehicle is separated from its motive power and parked at a location other than a facility operated by the consignor or consignee or a facility (e.g., a carrier's terminal or a marine terminal) subject to the provisions of § 172.602(c)(2), the carrier shall— ( 1 ) Mark the transport vehicle with the telephone number of the motor carrier on the front exterior near the brake hose and electrical connections or on a label, tag, or sign attached to the vehicle at the brake hose or electrical connection; or
( 2 ) Have the shipping paper and emergency response information readily available on the transport vehicle.
( c ) The requirements specified in paragraph (b) of this section do not apply to an unattended motor vehicle separated from its motive power when the motor vehicle is marked on an orange panel, a placard, or a plain white square-on-point configuration with the identification number of each hazardous material loaded therein, and the marking or placard is visible on the outside of the motor vehicle.
[Amdt. 172-151, 62 FR 1234, Jan. 8, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 39398, 39409, July 22, 1997; 63 FR 16076, Apr. 1, 1998]
DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

98-2225.

#### State v. Jeffers.

Hamilton App. No. C-980150. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 98-1779, *State v. Conyers,*Lucas App. No. L-97-1327, and 98-1929, *State v. Schultz,*Hamilton App. No. C-970954; briefing schedule stayed.