alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1313.5 Contract and contract summary availability. ( a ) ( 1 ) A contract summary filed under these rules shall be made available for public inspection in the Tariffs Branch of the Surface Transportation Board.
( 2 ) A contract summary filed under these rules also shall be made available by the carrier(s) participating in the contract, upon reasonable request.
( b ) Where not already required by § 1313.10(a)(5) of this part, the contract for which a summary is filed under these rules shall be provided immediately to the Board, upon request, for its use in carrying out its functions under the statute.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated August 21, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Collegiate Pacific Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Collegiate Pacific Inc. on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-64471 and File No.
333-34294) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-59878).

                                       /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 28, 2001
*Thursday, November 19,1998*

Dated: November 19, 1998

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

BEFORE THE COMMISSION OF FIVE JUDGES APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Jonathan P. Hein

Case No. 98-2388

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule II, Section 5(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio, the five-judge commission appointed to consider the above-cited matter met by telephone conference on November 19, 1998 to consider the record made before the hearing panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and the report of the hearing panel filed with the Supreme Court of Ohio on November 10,1998.

Having considered the report of the hearing panel and the record in this proceeding, the five-judge commission hereby orders that the parties may file written briefs not to exceed fifteen pages with the Clerk of the Supreme Court no later than December 7,1998. The parties may file reply briefs not to exceed ten pages no later than December 14,1998. The briefs shall be limited to the issues presented in Count II of the complaint filed by the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline on October 29, 1998 and the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Board hearing panel with respect to Count II contained in the hearing panel’s report of November 10,1998. Briefs shall be filed in the manner set forth in the Supreme Court’s order of November 16, 1998. A copy shall be served on opposing counsel.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION.

Richard A. Dove Secretary to the Commission
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 26, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Security Work Order Collaboration (“SWOC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: BMW of North America, LLC, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; NTRU Cryptosystems, Inc., Acton, MA; TechnoCom Corporation, Encino, CA; and Telcordia Technologies, Inc., Piscataway, NJ. The general area of SWOC's planned activity is the implementation of various software security elements relating to the vehicle infrastructure integration system, a national infrastructure to enable data collection and exchange in real time between vehicles, and between vehicles and the roadway.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-3411 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 1105.9 Coastal Zone Management Act requirements. ( a ) If the proposed action affects land or water uses within a State coastal zone designated pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1451 *et seq.*) applicant must comply with the following procedures: ( 1 ) If the proposed action is listed as subject to review in the State's coastal zone management plan, applicant (with, or prior to its filing) must certify (pursuant to 15 CFR 930.57 and 930.58) that the proposed action is consistent with the coastal zone management plan.
( 2 ) If the activity is not listed, applicant (with, or prior to its filing) must certify that actual notice of the proposal was given to the State coastal zone manager at least 40 days before the effective date of the requested action.
( b ) If there is consistency review under 15 CFR 930.54, the Board and the applicant will comply with the consistency certification procedures of 15 CFR 930. Also, the Board will withhold a decision, stay the effective date of a decision, or impose a condition delaying consummation of the action, until the applicant has submitted a consistency certification and either the state has concurred in the consistency certification, or an appeal to the Secretary of Commerce (under 15 CFR 930.64(e)) is successful.
§ 178.338-14 Gauging devices. ( a ) *Liquid level gauging devices.* ( 1 ) Unless a cargo tank is intended to be filled by weight, it must be equipped with one or more gauging devices, which accurately indicate the maximum permitted liquid level at the loading pressure, in order to provide a minimum of two percent outage below the inlet of the pressure control valve or pressure relief valve at the condition of incipient opening of that valve. A fixed-length dip tube, a fixed trycock line, or a differential pressure liquid level gauge must be used as the primary control for filling. Other gauging devices, except gauge glasses, may be used, but not as the primary control for filling.
( 2 ) The design pressure of each liquid level gauging device must be at least that of the tank.
( 3 ) If a fixed length dip tube or trycock line gauging device is used, it must consist of a pipe or tube of small diameter equipped with a valve at or near the jacket and extending into the cargo tank to a specified filling height. The fixed height at which the tube ends in the cargo tank must be such that the device will function when the liquid reaches the maximum level permitted in loading.
( 4 ) The liquid level gauging device used as a primary control for filling must be designed and installed to accurately indicate the maximum filling level at the point midway of the tank both longitudinally and laterally.
( b ) *Pressure gauges.* Each cargo tank must be provided with a suitable pressure gauge indicating the lading pressure and located on the front of the jacket so it can be read by the driver in the rear view mirror. Each gauge must have a reference mark at the cargo tank design pressure or the set pressure of the pressure relief valve or pressure control valve, whichever is lowest.
( c ) *Orifices.* All openings for dip tube gauging devices and pressure gauges in flammable cryogenic liquid service must be restricted at or inside the jacket by orifices no larger than 0.060-inch diameter. Trycock lines, if provided, may not be greater than 1 ⁄ 2-inch nominal pipe size.
[Amdt. 178-77, 48 FR 27706, June 16, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 24317, June 12, 1984]
OMB Control Number 2070-0032; EPA ICR Number 0596.10

ICR ATTACHMENT A

FIFRA Section 18

(7 USC 136p)

SEC. 18. [7 U.S.C. 136p] EXEMPTION OF FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES. 

The Administrator may, at the Administrator’s discretion, exempt any Federal or State 

agency from any provision of this Act if the Administrator determines that emergency conditions 

exist which require such exemption. The Administrator, in determining whether or not such 

emergency conditions exist, shall consult with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Governor of 

any State concerned if they request such determination.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 145 (Monday, July 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 41513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee, CIDR A.
    Date: September 7, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To Review and Evaluate Grant Applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Rockville, MD 
20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jerry Roberts, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5636 Fishers 
Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9305, Bethesda, MD 20892-9306, (301)-402-0838, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#026870313b6f426c6b6a2c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b3abeae0b499b7b0b1f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee, CIDR B.
    Date: September 7, 2007.
    Time: 12:01 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To Review and Evaluate Grant Applications.
    Place: The National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Rockville, MD 
20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Rudy Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, 
Bethesda, MD 20852, (301)-402-0838, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5727382d2d36232325173a363e3b79393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5626392c2c37222224163b373f3a78383f3e78313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: July 23, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3684 Filed 7-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 18, 2014

----

Testimony and Statements            Physical Commodities Activities -- statement by Michael S. Gibson, director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, before a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the Federal Reserve's supervision of financial institutions engaged in physical commodities activities.            -Published, January 15, 2014            Forms            Forms -- initial Board review (1) to extend with revision the Ad Hoc Payments Systems Survey (FR 3054a), Currency Functionality Survey (FR 3054d), and Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9C) and (2) to extend without revision the Currency Quality Sampling Survey (FR 3054b), Currency Quality Survey (FR 3054c), Annual Daylight Overdraft Capital Report for U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks (FR 2225), Report of Net Debit Cap (FR 2226), Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Holding Companies (FR Y-9LP), Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Holding Companies (FR Y-9SP), Financial Statements for Employee Stock Ownership Plan Holding Companies (FR Y-9ES), and Supplement to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9CS).            -Proposed, January 13, 2014            Personnel            Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation -- appointment of Constance Horsley as assistant director and Fang Du and John Beebe as advisers.            -Approved, January 17, 2014            Regulations and Policies            Physical Commodities Activities -- advance notice of proposed rulemaking requesting comment on various issues related to physical commodity activities conducted by financial holding companies and the restrictions imposed on these activities to ensure they are conducted in a safe and sound manner, consistent with applicable law.            -Approved, January 13, 2014                        Trust Preferred Securities -- interagency interim final rule, with request for comment, to permit banking entities to retain interests in pooled investment vehicles that meet certain criteria and are backed primarily by trust preferred securities issued by community banking organizations.            -Approved, January 14, 2014            Enforcement            First Southwest Bancorporation, Inc., Alamosa, Colorado -- written agreement dated October 20, 2010, terminated January 9, 2014.            -Announced, January 14, 2014            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
*Tuesday, November 10,1998*

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

98-1627.

#### State v. Calhoun.

Lake App. No. 97-L-063.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MAX GROSSMAN,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

CITY OF EL PASO,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00272-CV

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017-DCV2528)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the trial 

court’s order denying Appellant/Cross-Appellee’s application for a temporary injunction. We 

therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying injunctive relief and remand the cause to the trial 

court with instructions that it grant Appellant/Cross-Appellee’s request for a temporary injunction,

consistent with the opinion of this Court and pending further proceedings in the trial court. 

We further order that the trial court’s order denying Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s plea to the 

jurisdiction is affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

We further order that Appellant/Cross-Appellee recover from Appellee/Cross-Appellant

all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J., dissenting
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.193 Bromoacetone, methyl bromide, chloropicrin and methyl bromide or methyl chloride mixtures, etc. ( a ) Bromoacetone must be packaged as follows in metal boxes (4A, 4B or 4N) or wooden boxes (4C1, 4C2, 4D or 4F) with inner glass receptacles or tubes in hermetically sealed metal receptacles in corrugated fiberboard cartons. Bottles may not contain over 500 g (17.6 ounces) of liquid each and must be cushioned in cans with at least 12.7 mm (0.5 inch) of absorbent material. Total amount of liquid in the outer box must not exceed 11 kg (24 pounds). Packagings must conform to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group I performance level.
( b ) Bromoacetone, methyl bromide, chloropicrin and methyl bromide mixtures, chloropicrin and methyl chloride mixtures, and chloropicrin mixtures charged with non-flammable, non-liquefied compressed gas must be packed in Specification 3A, 3AA, 3B, 3C, 3E, 4A, 4B, 4BA, 4BW, or 4C cylinders having not over 113 kg (250 pounds) water capacity (nominal) except: ( 1 ) DOT Specification 4BW cylinders containing chloropicrin and methyl bromide mixtures may not exceed 453 kg (1000 pounds); and
( 2 ) The capacity limit of this paragraph does not apply to shipments of methyl bromide.
( c ) Methyl bromide mixtures containing up to 2% chloropicrin must be packaged in 4G fiberboard boxes with inside metal cans containing not over one pound each, or inside metal cans with a minimum wall thickness of 0.007 inch containing not over 13 ⁄ 4 pounds each. The one-pound can must be capable of withstanding an internal pressure of 130 psig without leakage or permanent distortion. Vapor pressure of the contents must not exceed 130 psig at 55 °C (130 °F). The 13 ⁄ 4-pound can must be capable of withstanding an internal pressure of 140 psig without leakage or permanent distortion. Vapor pressure of the contents must not exceed 140 psig at 55 °C (130 °F). Cans must not be liquid full at 130 °F. Cans must be constructed of tinplate or lined with suitable material and must have concave or pressure ends.
( d ) Cylinders, except those containing methyl bromide, must conform to § 173.40 of this part.
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52643, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66271, Dec. 20, 1991; 57 FR 45463, Oct. 1, 1992; 78 FR 1088, Jan. 7, 2013; 81 FR 3675, Jan. 21, 2016]
From: drdim@comcast.net [mailto:drdim@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

Sincerely, 

Dorrin Rosenfeld 

326 de anza dr. 

vallejo, CA 94589
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                  Calculation of Earnings per Share

                                     January 31, 1998   February 1, 1997   February 3, 1996
                                     ----------------   ----------------   ---------------- 
<S>                                  <C>                <C>               <C> 
Net Income                               $ 7,348            $ 5,873           $ 4,617
                                     ================   ===============   ================ 
Weighted average common shares                          
outstanding                                7,824              7,744             7,662
                                                        
Effect of dilutive securities:                          
 Stock options                               295                317               311
                                     ----------------   ---------------   ---------------- 
                                                        
Weighted average common shares                          
and common share equivalents               8,119              8,061             7,973
                                     ================   ===============   ================ 
</TABLE>
#### Mason H. Place, *Respondent, v.*Gilbert E. Parsons, *Appel*lant.

Judgment of County Court reversed, and that of the • justice affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Macomber, J.
#### § 1584.101 Applicability.

The requirements of this subpart apply to each OTRB owner/operator providing fixed-route service that originates, travels through, or ends in a geographic location identified in appendix A to this part.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Dunphy et al., as Drainage Commissioners, Appellants, *v.*Abram H. Wiggins, as Supervisor of the Town of Canton, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Dunphy*v. Wiggins, 128 App. Div. 882, affirmed.

(Argued January 3, 1910;

decided October 18, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May *5,*1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to issue town bonds.

*John R. Keeler*and *Prank K. Cleaveland*for appellants.

*Vasco P. Abbott*for respondent.

The Appellate Division having declined to amend the order appealed from, the order is affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Webneb, Willabd Baetlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 19, 1995 (97), Para 97.15 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1156]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.97.15  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. SANDERS:
       Page 84, after line 17, insert the following new section:
       Sec. 628. None of the funds appropriated by this Act may be 
     used for salaries or expenses of any employee, including any 
     employee of the Executive Office of the President, in 
     connection with the obligation or expenditure of funds in the 
     exchange stabilization fund.

It was decided in the

Yeas

245

affirmative

Nays

183
```
#### § 1582.111 [Reserved]