- ~ -- --- - - - ---- --- -- - - -- --- ---- - - - -- -

I 

[ 

TEST REPORT 

for 

Lee Brick 

Sanford, NC 

......... 

lee Bridl& 

P.O.a-1Gt 

tte ~ 

Sanford. NC ma1 

ECH 

Air-Tech If~ lLC 

p. 0. Box 1235l 

Research TrtaAgte Patt. NC 27101-2353 

(•t&) SH-4338 

TaM Date: April25, 2007 

I 

I 

0 \ /\ - \ ) \ ' 

a.ti:Ls /2001 
Alr..T-~UC 

leeBfk* , .. ~ ....... -U'rC) 

This report has tleen reviewed tty the following Air· T&eh ~L l.LC pef$GNWII 

and is a tnJe represeAtatfon of the results ~ from 1he sampling Pf01fam for the lee Brick 

Senfor.d~ NC fadlly. The ~ami~ metheda were perfo~ ift aeoordatlee with 

~es ~by the State of Ner1h CaNina. 

A at..tifteGt Sci>ur-ce Test tndlvtduat (OST1) from Air· Teeh ~ LLC was 

present durq the test. 

Team leader. 

Reviewer: 
TABLE OF CONTeNTS 

AJit. ,_,. 6nvhn...,.~ uc 

lee .. Teat Report (ATW-0427-l.RC) 

'hstOete: Apt!25. 2007 • .,. ii 

1.0 INTAOD\JCTJ:ON ...................................................... 1 

2.0 RI!Slll.TS ~y .................................................. 2 

2.1 Hf:.,., tO~ Resuls ...................................... 2 

2.2 ~Mallet~ Aestllts ................................. 3 

3.0 SAMPUHG AND AHALVTICAL htiTH()t;)S ................................. 4 

3.1 ~ ~ t.y EPA Methods 2SA ............................ 4 

3.2 !PA~t~l.llftd4 .................................. ...... 1 

4.0 QUALITY~ QUAUTY CONTROL .............................. 9 

4.1 ~~-~-··································9 

4.2 Datt-~ -~ Criterla .................................. 10 

Table 1. 

Tabte 2. 

Table l. 

Table 4. 

Table 4. 

Figure 1. 

Figure 2. 

Appendices 

Tables 

~~OtatletReswtt.s ~ ......•...................•..... 2 

~-~~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3-

lnletY..21~ •....................... ~ ...................... 3 

S~ &I~ Criteria~ Control Limits~ at\d Correettve Action ..... 11 

Aa.-ol~~ ........................................ 12 

Figures 

Sampling L~ Sc:hematic ...................................... 6 

Method 2'M ~ Tralrl ........................................ 8 

Appendix A Field 0eta SMets 

Appendix 8 ~~ 

Appendix c e~ 

Appendix D Pfoasa o.ta 

Appendix E QST1 Cettlficates 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 

~r-.,~u.e 

lee 8riek fest Ret*f CA'I'V7-G427'-UTc) 

lett De M2f, 2001 • em 1 

Aitf.1Hh 

~ 

~----~-~ emiasient testinf by Leelriek and- Tlte 

M their ~cf:. Nt facilitJ hit.-1t0 ~with t,_ NI$HAP $~ar11 A and 

JJJJJ~ 

~ 

wndW Air,...,. No. U4MT23. Tntiftt was c&A4ude4 at one natural 

~'bride ~-wan._. tD No. fl...f«. with a dry Dmestcme edserber OOfttrol 

*¥lee ~OLA).IO Me. ~. T-M ~ cd lfttefest and test methods employed in 

........ dlafaeterlptioM .. -~ MlcM. 

: I 

TNs report presents the ruu1ts ef 1M ~ iR Section 2. A descril!>lbA of the test methods 

aftd tesu11 &f the qwalkr ~ ....,._ llatwwe tateR 8f8 contatfted- iA seetJeM 3 aAClJ 4. 

tes1J*e:thetf. 

- - -" 

. ,. ....... ... . 

~ . ... 

..... I!IP.,. ' -

--~ ....... ··- -·· ... """"'- -..... _IE::·" .. - .. . -

' 2.f% 2tl.t ........ 2 1.12 1&1 ... , 

l- 1.10 1·1.1 0..0013$1 

A.,.,_ 1.11 ft.7 O.OIO'nl 

._ ... 

, NCI ,., 

.#td..f Mlf ~- ... ~-- .Mif_- ~-

1 fUJS ...... t.11 o.n ~-- 'O.OQ!t 

z D.04 ...... t..CO fU)t o..n o.ov . --

l 1.04 LQI;II , .. O.tO ••• o.oat 

A• .Uf I!~ t.ff O.ftJ .O.fJ Q.!Hrt 
AJII.JredlrJtvhJtoriiMC~U.C:: 

LM 8rtdl tel~~.ui'e) 

2.0 RBSULTS SUMMARY 

Tllltee test NM _,.~-the ~don of~ rates fet eaeh of h 

~-...... ~·test~~-test~ate presented below. 

. lftGJ:b..,. 

~ 

... * ... ~~ to C»>ed ........ during~ of red brieb"O Brtdt 

rates ..,.. 10.M tons per hour (tph) clurinf the test perlods. 

2.1 HF and HCI Sampling Results 

Sam'*'$ went ~ isokiAeuo.ly at the outat br a1 tnre• teSt runs. A summary of the 

results ofth4lH' nHaau.-~ aACf ~rates is prtJ8flttdin Tate 1. 

AI three---~ with lekf sampling~~ t0 sample traiA .,_tint 

tam~---~ 

The average two OM~ of HF and HCt were~ teD 1M 1.1 and 1-1,.7 ~cl 

re~. UsfAt ~fGwtlata ~ ~._ tesb yields average mess 

emisskm ,.r.r.w eiO.MMttand 1.111b11Vfor HO. MF emiSsions rangecthm-0.04 t0 

0.~ lblht wNie .. ,.,.. &f MCJ ~ wu t.-$3' lG 1.11 lt»#hr. 

Produdloa rates......., t&M ft'\. A~ this a~el)f0du¢tbn rate to l!le ma•s 

&ml$$1oft ,.._,.... yflktMP ~. • ~ f!AO~ tblton bridt ~ Avefage 

emtsstoM ot ~were~ tG N 0.18 bltoR. 1lw ·tta ~rate is ai!KMt 1tte limit for a 

new kiiA ~ atflt•ter"*' to~- T_.,. ..-~cted at the v.t to tmt 

~et tG detetmtM,....... ~~· !PA ~ 28 {Me fable 3). these results 

incfieate a 34% remeva1 ~- The requirement tor Aew ki1fts is 85%. 

,_,. CJaa 

C•tteelltnUon l!mlsslon Rate 

Run Plow HI' lf(lJ HF HI' HCI Hf&l 

' Tlflt• L4Hillti hi••I t•am4 llli4I'J -~-) llOA'td ~1~/~o:.fll 

1 1MG-1f'4t 1:0141 2.12 21.8 0.0.5 0.0041 1.19 0.11 

2 1~11~1~1 ... ••• 1a:r elM . (1.0031 1.03 •~ot 

l ,., .. , .. .... 1.10 11.1 . ...0.0030 1.ft 0.10 ~ 

AnMM .IMQt. f .. P ft~7 tAO-f. !JM4 f.tf t~.Jtl 

Ur!k 1~011 f.Qff 
~~uc 

L• Briel f-Mt ..,_. (A'rtf-6t17UTC:J 

., ..... f:e!25,2G01- ,, 

~.......,was~ tot the cdetertniAation of filterable PM'"*'CJ ~"of 

Metho4 ~ A~ ot•• sampiAf results is presentecf in TatM 2, The avefqe 

emission rate of particul8te matter was found to be 0,19 tb/hr and 0.01llblton, 

Tabte 2. Method 21A PM Results Summary 

Fhl• ••• 

C<*•ltfnt#.ell . ......... 

:lilrl,fft ,., Pfl, PM, 

• n.. Flew fl"dmJ (~cq llllllt4 ~ -

1 t.QiM..1'1.S 1-Q.if 0.10051 .... 0.-M 

2 tt11·1Sll .... G.QG27·1 o.u .... t '. 

3. tl$t.•1>4:$1 .... O..tUIS ..... G .. OtJ " 

... Ill Allt~H .1..1, f:.tll 

Table 3. Inlet M·21 Results 

-

Flf>w Vlrt$td '* H¢1 

,.., .. J'!llmt 1,_,//j. . .IL • ld._ .. l IJJI!IM llbiM -

1 tfJ40..t140 1115 3,21 ... 1.11 

2 1l1$.t31'1 1157 3.31 4.1tt 1.78 

3 13(5..1445 1168 3.34 5.03 1,72 

Average 4.JJ 1.19 

Average&~ 

lfdret 4.82 1,71 

Owlet 0.04 1.11 

"""'· ... --. - - ~.- . - . ~ .. .., tt~n., H~ 
3.0 SAMPLlNG AND ANALYTICAL M&THODS 

Alr-TethE~ U.C 

lee lridt T.-t Report fk18'P-041?-U'I'CJ 

"fest Oete:,.!!, ., • Pen .t 

The ~ emtssiona were~ ftem the exhaust of a bridt kiln that operates M 

hoWs,... day an4 H¥M 4ap,., weN. The pr:oeess was~ wW\ a steaay stream 0f 

~ eatts entering and leaW\g the k~ one cart every 61 minutes. The kiln was fired with 

natural oas. Staek gas tMtperat\Jfe was approximately 35CrF. 

Samples were eolleded from a siftgkJ dreular staek that is 43.5• in diameter. Twe sam,11nt 

J!)Ottl that were sa- apapt on the same 1\)tafte were positioned appr.imatety 1'$' above 1M 

et\1t8Ree from the fan. These pofte were ~ 4• in dia.,..ter. A schematic of the 

~ loealeA eGAtaiBinf low~ aM pelftt toctaloft is ~ iA figwe 1. 

The samplint ~ are Gf~ tn lhls sedioA amf ar• dite mo.t feeent ~ of the 

ePA~ methe45. Thfee ~...-.of uehtype ~ Mlow wer:e 

colstad. The emlssioA results of ueh polutant ate~~ as flue gaa ~\ration aAd 

~per hour. 

3 .. t Partlewlate Sampling by SPA Metho4s 2M 

&:PA ~-28A was UMCJ to measure~ matter {PM) emilstou. nris me1hM 

.... eollemlef!l olfilarltite{OrftotlHtal) PM .. h:flia fMJaMe, • aheatWmter. ~ 

were Gtlaftled fGf eotee:tioA of HF 1M HOI as pet Mel't9d 21A. 

3.1. f Pdn¢lpte 

sampling wes ~ aecordh't to the procedures of Method HA at the 0Yflet le$t ~. 

TM• ~·· efttaiJaotinefio~ofa ~samplefdlowect., ~of add QneS iA dlute ~of wiNrie adcl. A setaetftatie of Iris~ traM is~ in 

Ffgufe 2. 

The nu. was sample was withdfawft through a QJass nome intG a- glass proM. P~ 

matter was 'filte~M through a heate<!l Teftoft ftlter anc!l tl\en entered the~ pertioA of the 

sarnpiAg ttain. This ~ ~ eGASJ$ted of two impiAfefs ~ tOO. ri of 0. tN 

sulfvrie add each folowed by 8ft empty impiftger. then a silica gel ecmtairq ·~ used f0r 

flnal moisture .colecttioA. A type S pito.t tube aftfit tYJMt K theFI!'AOCCOuple were wse4 to measure 

velody ,_.,.. and~ .. • eaeh ~point. A ealibfated dfy ps meter was 

usecl to f.fteaUre sample volume. A ealbrated oriftce pfa¢eGt on the meter outtet was used to 

set sample rate. 

Jntat sa"'J)fing was conducted ~to the procedures of Methocd 26. The nonisofdnetie Method 26 sample was co1leded from three points at the Jnlet toeation.