alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      10.9**






Marketing Services
      Agreement





Party
      A:
      Shan Xi Kai Da Lv You Gu Wen You Xian Gong Si


Party
      B:
      Yachao Tuo (ID No.)





|1. | In
              compliance with the Law of People’s Republic of China and relevant
              Regulation and Ordinance, both parties come to an agreement that Party
              B
              responsible for the company promotion of Party
              A.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | Scope
              of Service
|-- | ------------------------------

Party
      B
      shall provide the promotion plan to Party A and perform the
      promotion.





|3. | Term,
              Location and Execution
|-- | ------------------------------------------

The
      term
      of this agreement is from September 1 st 2005 to
      June 15 th 2006.
      The promotion shall be executed in Xi An, Shan Xi, China. There will be 10
      working days for Party A to review the plan provided by Party B. Then, Party
      A
      shall pay Parity B once it accepts the plan.





|4. | Service
              Fee
|-- | -------------------------

4-1
      The
      total amount is US$12,500.


4-2
      Party
      A may pay according to the first way of the following two ways , so long as
      final payment is made within 10 working days after the plan is
      accepted.


|1) | 50,000
              freely tradable common shares of DKDY; or
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------

|2) | US$12,500.
|-- | ----------




|5. | Breach
|-- | ------

Any
      party
      fails to execute this agreement shall take the liability according to the Law
      of
      People’s Republic of China and relevant Regulation and Ordinance.





|6. | Dispute
|-- | -------

Any
      dispute arising from performing this agreement shall be handled under the
      principle of negotiation and compromise. Otherwise, shall be submitted to either
      of the following two ways:


6-1
      Arbitration Commission


6-2
      Peole’s Court





|7. | Term
|-- | ----

This
      agreement is commence on September 1 st 2005,
      and terminate on September 1 st 2006.





Party
      A:
      Shan Xi Kai Da Lv You Gu Wen You Xian Gong Si





/s/
      Ming Lei


Ming
      Lei





AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED AS OF August 26, 2005:





Party
      B:
      Yachao Tuo (ID No.)





/s/
      Yachao Tuo


Yachao
      Tuo
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.37 Deletions of Sponsors from Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 749]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.37  deletions of sponsors from public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 995: Mr. Allard.
```
#### § 1114.28 Depositions, requests for admission, written interrogatories, and responses thereto: inclusion in record.

At the oral hearing, or upon the submission of statements under the modified procedure, depositions, requests for admission and written interrogatories, and respective responses may be offered in evidence by the party at whose instance they were taken. If not offered by such party, they may be offered in whole or in part by any other party. If only part of a deposition, request for admission or written interrogatory, or response thereto is offered in evidence by a party, any other party (where the matter is being heard orally) may require him to introduce all of it which is relevant to the part introduced, and any party may introduce any other parts. Such depositions, requests for admission and written interrogatories, and responses thereto should be admissible in evidence subject to such objections as to competency of the witness, or competency, relevancy, or materiality of the testimony as were noted at the time of their taking or are made at the time they are offered in evidence.
#### Jacobs, Executor v. Meyers.

(Decided October 31, 1919.)

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Wills—Will Contest. — In t'bis will contest case the jury was properly instructed and the evidence sufficient io support their verdict finding that the paper in controversy, was the last will of Mrs. Jacobs:

WHEELER & HUGHES for appellant.

EATON & BOYD for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Carroll

Affirming.

This is an ordinary will contest case. There is nothing new or novel about it. The validity of a codicil to the will of Mrs. Jacobs purporting to have been written by her by which she gave to Cornelia Meyers $2,000.00 was contested by the collateral kindred of the testatrix upon the grounds that the codicil was not wholly in the handwriting of Mrs. Jacobs; that she did not have testimentary capacity; and that its execution was procured by the undue influence of Mrs. Meyers.

The evidence_ in the case, as in all cases of this character, was conflicting upon the issues in controversy, and it is our opinion that the weight of the evidence conduces to show that Mrs. Meyers, the beneficiary, had great if not undue influence over Mrs. Jacobs growing out of the age of Mrs. Jacobs and the intimate relations existing ■between them, resulting from the position' of nurse' and attendant occupied by Mrs. Meyers at the time the paper in controversy was written and for some years before.

The jury, however, after seeing the witnesses and* hearing the evidence, found the paper to be a codicil to the will of Mrs. Jacobs, and as their finding can not be said to be flagrantly against the weight of the evidence we can not disturb it.

The instruction on the subject of undue influence' is criticized, but is substantially in the form of instructions upon this subject that have been approved by this court time and time again. ' . .

Wherefore the'judgment is affirmed.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.23 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1019]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.23  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. HORN:

       Page 3, line 3, strike ``$588,243,000'' and insert 
     ``$489,093,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

137

negative

Nays

294
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (CCPAC) will meet on July 25-26, 2007, in Eureka, California. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP).

# DATES:

The meeting will be a half day field trip from 12 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on July 25, 2007 and a one day meeting from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on July 26, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

July 25, 2007, is a half day field trip to the Head Waters Trail. Meet for the filed trip in Fortuna, California at the Park and Ride Parking Lot, Off Kenmar Exit, on Highway 101. On July 26, 2007, the meeting will be held at the Six Rivers National Forest, Supervisor's Office, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kathy Allen, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501 (707) 441-3557                         *kmallen@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics to be covered on July 26, 2007, include: (1) Survey and Manage Update; (2) Aquatic Conservation Strategy Update; (3) Orleans Community Fuels Reduction Project Presentation; (4) Northern Spotted Owl Recovery Plan; (5) Managing Wilderness Areas; and (6) Marijuana Cultivation Presentation. 

The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: July 13, 2007.

Tyrone Kelley,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 07-3515 Filed 7-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
| Signature                 |   | Title                                                                                  |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                   |
| /s/ Daniel Rooney         |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of                                |
| Daniel      Rooney        |   | the      Board of Directors and Director  (principal executive      officer) |
|                      |   |                                                                                   |
| /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie     |   | Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer                                        |
| Gerald      S. Blaskie    |   | (principal      financial officer and principal accounting officer)                    |
|                      |   |                                                                                   |
| /s/ Robert H. Peitz       |   | Director                                                                               |
| Robert      H. Peitz      |   |                                                                                   |
|                      |   |                                                                                   |
| /s/ Walter J. Doyle       |   | Director                                                                               |
| Walter      J. Doyle      |   |                                                                                   |
|                      |   |                                                                                   |
| /s/ Robert J. Baker, Jr.  |   | Director                                                                               |
| Robert      J. Baker, Jr. |   |                                                                                   |
|                      |   |                                                                                   |
| /s/ Edward W. Ungar       |   | Director                                                                               |
| Edward      W. Ungar      |   |                                                                                   |

----
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 14, 1995 (79), Para 79.10 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 908-909]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.79.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. SPRATT:

       Strike out section 232 (page 31, line 17 through page 32, 
     line 4), and insert in lieu thereof the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 232. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY OF THE UNITED 
                   STATES.

       It is the policy of the United States--
       (1) to deploy at the earliest practical date highly 
     effective theater missile defenses (TMD) to protect forward-
     deployed and expeditionary elements of the Armed Forces of 
     the United States and to complement the missile defense 
     capabilities of our allies and forces friendly to the United 
     States; and
       (2) to develop, test, and deploy, at the earliest practical 
     dates, a national missile defense system (NMD) that complies 
     with the ABM Treaty and is capable of providing a highly 
     effective defense of the United States against limited 
     ballistic missile attacks.
       Page 32, strike out line 17 and all that follows through 
     line 5 on page 33 and insert in lieu thereof the following:
       (1) Up to 100 ground-based interceptors at the site now 
     designated by the ABM Treaty or additional ground-based 
     interceptors at such other site or sites as the Secretary of 
     Defense may recommend if deployment of ground-based 
     interceptors at more than one site is allowed by amendment to 
     the ABM Treaty.
       (2) Fixed, ground-based radars.
       (3) Space-based sensors that are capable of acquiring and 
     tracking incoming reentry vehicles as an adjunct to ground-
     based radars.
       (4) Battle management, communication, and control systems 
     integrated with ground-based radars and space-based sensors.
       Page 38, line 5, strike out ``DEFINED''.
       Page 38, line 6, insert ``(a) Definition.--'' before ``For 
     purposes of''.
       Page 38, at the end of line 11, strike out the period and 
     insert the following:

     and all Agreed Statements and amendments to such Treaty in 
     effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act or made 
     after such date.

       Page 38, after line 11, insert the following:
       (b) Interpretation.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     interpreted to violate, or to authorize the violation by the 
     United States of, the ABM Treaty. Any provision of this 
     subtitle that authorizes or requires the United States to 
     deviate from the ABM Treaty is premised on the assumption 
     that before any such action is taken amendments will be

[[Page 909]]

     made to the Treaty to make such provision compliant with the 
     Treaty.

It was decided in the

Yeas

185

negative

Nays

242
```
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





1.  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Group Holdings, Inc. fka, Oasis Online Technologies Corp., a Minnesota company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q A/1 for the Quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer
32.1
            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.





I,
Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer of Adino Energy Corporation,
hereby certify that to my knowledge, Adino Energy Corporation’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Adino Energy
Corporation.




Date:
August 7, 2009





/s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.Timothy
      G. Byrd, Sr.
#### § 1185.3 Procedures.

The original application or petition shall be signed by the individual applicant or petitioner and shall be verified under oath. Petitions and applications should comply with the STB's general rules of practice set forth at 49 CFR part 1104. Applications or petitions may be made by persons on their own behalf.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending April 23, 2011

----

Testimony and Statements            Financial Literacy -- statement by Chairman Bernanke, submitted for the record of a hearing by a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on April 12, 2011, regarding the importance of financial literacy to a stable economy and the Federal Reserve's efforts to help Americans make informed financial decisions.            -Published, April 20, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Bankruptcy-Related Studies -- request for public information and comment on two studies that the Board is required to conduct, in consultation with the U.S. courts, on the resolution of financial companies under the bankruptcy code, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, April 20, 2011                        Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) -- publication for comment of proposed amendments to prohibit creditors from making mortgage loans without regard to the consumer's ability to repay and to implement limits on prepayment penalties, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Announced, April 19, 2011            Enforcement            Premier Bancorp, Inc., Wilmette, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, April 21, 2011                        Syringa Bancorp, Boise, Idaho -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the State of Idaho Department of Finance.            -Announced, April 21, 2011                        TransPecos Financial Corp., San Antonio, Texas, and TransPecos Banks, Pecos -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and the Texas Commissioner of Banking.            -Announced, April 19, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
year ended March 30, 1997 Form 10-K Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000830159                        
<NAME>                        American Tax Credit Properties, 1 Lp
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         284
<SECURITIES>                                   2,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,612
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (594)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,384)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (57.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23






                                   EXHIBIT 23




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





                           ------------------------



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
     of BSB Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 339-2138) of our report dated
     January 23, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
     BSB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended
     December 31, 1997, 1996, 1995, which report is included in the Annual
     Report on Form 10-K.



     COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
     Syracuse, N.Y.
     March 27, 1998