alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending May 4, 2013

----

Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Report of Selected Balance Sheet Items for Discount Window Borrowers (FR 2046) and to implement the Payments Research Survey (FR 3067).            -Proposed, April 28, 2013            Enforcement            The Baraboo Bancorporation, Inc., Baraboo, Wisconsin -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, May 2, 2013                        Harbor Bankshares Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland -- written agreement dated July 22, 2010, terminated April 26, 2013.            -Announced, May 2, 2013                        NorCal Community Bancorp, Alameda, California -- written agreement dated December 20, 2010, terminated April 24, 2013.            -Announced, May 2, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending October 26, 2013

----

Change in Bank Control            Donegal Group, Inc., Marietta, Pennsylvania -- change in bank control of Donegal Group and its subsidiary, Union Community Bank, Lancaster.            -Permitted, October 21, 2013            Regulations and Policies            Qualified Mortgage Fair Lending Risks -- interagency statement to address industry questions on fair lending compliance and the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage standards rule.            -Announced, October 22, 2013                        Regulation WW (Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standards and Monitoring) -- publication for comment of interagency proposed rule to create a standardized minimum liquidity requirement for large and internationally active banking organizations and systemically important nonbank financial companies designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council.            -Approved, October 24, 2013            Enforcement            The Bank of New York Mellon, New York, New York -- cease and desist order dated April 13, 2012, terminated October 16, 2013.            -Announced, October 22, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Editorial Note on Part 105
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 105 appear at 70 FR 56087, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 105.20 Guidance and interpretations. ( a ) *Hazardous materials regulations.* You can obtain information and answers to your questions on compliance with the hazardous materials regulations (49 CFR parts 171 through 180) and interpretations of those regulations by contacting PHMSA's Office of Hazardous Materials Safety as follows: ( 1 ) Call the Hazardous Materials Information Center at 1-800-467-4922 (in Washington, DC, call (202) 366-4488). The Center is staffed from 9 a.m. through 5 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays. After hours, you can leave a recorded message and your call will be returned by the next business day.
( 2 ) E-mail the Hazardous Materials Information Center at *infocntr@dot.gov .*
( 3 ) Obtain hazardous materials safety information via the Internet at *http://www.phmsa.dot.gov .*
( 4 ) Send a letter, with your return address and a daytime telephone number, to: Standards and Rulemaking Division, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Attn: PHH-10, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( b ) *Federal hazardous materials transportation law and preemption.* You can obtain information and answers to your questions on Federal hazardous materials transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101 *et seq.,* and Federal preemption of State, local, and Indian tribe hazardous material transportation requirements, by contacting PHMSA's Office of the Chief Counsel as follows: ( 1 ) Call the office of the Chief Counsel at (202) 366-4400 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays.
( 2 ) Access information from the Office of the Chief Counsel via the Internet at *http://www.phmsa.dot.gov .*
( 3 ) Send a letter, with your return address and a daytime telephone number, to: Office of the Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Attn: PHC-10, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( 4 ) Contact the Office of the Chief Counsel for a copy of applications for preemption determinations, waiver of preemption determinations, and inconsistency rulings received by PHMSA before February 1, 1997.
[70 FR 56087, Sept. 23, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 55682, Oct. 1, 2007; 76 FR 56310, Sept. 13, 2011]
-----Original Message----- 

From: nancysworkshop@gmail.com [mailto:nancysworkshop@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Silver 

5790 Charteroak Dr 

Cincinnati, OH 45236
§ 1544.305 Security Directives and Information Circulars. ( a ) TSA may issue an Information Circular to notify aircraft operators of security concerns. When TSA determines that additional security measures are necessary to respond to a threat assessment or to a specific threat against civil aviation, TSA issues a Security Directive setting forth mandatory measures.
( b ) Each aircraft operator required to have an approved aircraft operator security program must comply with each Security Directive issued to the aircraft operator by TSA, within the time prescribed in the Security Directive for compliance.
( c ) Each aircraft operator that receives a Security Directive must— ( 1 ) Within the time prescribed in the Security Directive, verbally acknowledge receipt of the Security Directive to TSA.
( 2 ) Within the time prescribed in the Security Directive, specify the method by which the measures in the Security Directive have been implemented (or will be implemented, if the Security Directive is not yet effective).
( d ) In the event that the aircraft operator is unable to implement the measures in the Security Directive, the aircraft operator must submit proposed alternative measures and the basis for submitting the alternative measures to TSA for approval. The aircraft operator must submit the proposed alternative measures within the time prescribed in the Security Directive. The aircraft operator must implement any alternative measures approved by TSA.
( e ) Each aircraft operator that receives a Security Directive may comment on the Security Directive by submitting data, views, or arguments in writing to TSA. TSA may amend the Security Directive based on comments received. Submission of a comment does not delay the effective date of the Security Directive.
( f ) Each aircraft operator that receives a Security Directive or Information Circular and each person who receives information from a Security Directive or Information Circular must: ( 1 ) Restrict the availability of the Security Directive or Information Circular, and information contained in either document, to those persons with an operational need-to-know.
( 2 ) Refuse to release the Security Directive or Information Circular, and information contained in either document, to persons other than those with an operational need-to-know without the prior written consent of TSA.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 9, 2013

----

Testimony and Statements            Anti-Money Laundering and the Bank Secrecy Act -- statement by Governor Powell before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the Federal Reserve's role in the U.S. government's effort to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.            -Published, March 7, 2013            Monetary and Financial Policy            Term Deposit Facility -- TDF auction of $3 billion in 28-day term deposits on March 11, 2013.            -Announced, March 6, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### Josephine Hull, *Respondent, v.*Jeremiah S. Hart, Appellant.

Order denying motion to change the place of trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, to be set off against the costs allowed on the other appeal. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
#### § 1580.111 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission tours.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Monday, July 9, 2007, Postal Regulatory Commissioners and advisory staff members will tour an                         *Amazon.com*                         facility in New Castle, Delaware and the United States Postal Service processing and distribution plant in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The purpose of the tours is to observe operations.                    

      ( print page 37277)    

# DATES:

July 9, 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ann C. Fisher, Chief of Staff, Postal Regulatory Commission, at 202-789-6803 or                         *ann.fisher@prc.gov.*

Dated: July 2, 2007.

Garry J. Sikora,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-3305 Filed 7-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.28 Point of Order]
[Page 1100]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.28  point of order

  Mr. FRANK made a point of order, and said:
  ``Point of order, Mr. Speaker. My point of order is that unless the 
Speaker has taken the words of the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Bonior] 
to heart, that (the remarks of Mr. Paxon) violates the subject of the 
Speaker's previous instructions. Mr. Speaker. It is off the point of the 
issue of appointing the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Laughlin].''
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WALKER, sustained the point of order, and 
said:
  ``The gentleman from New York [Mr. Paxon] is reminded he must proceed 
in order.''
  After further debate,
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RON G. VOSS, ) No. 12-56168 ) Plaintiff - Appellant, ) D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00842-H-KSC ) v. ) MEMORANDUM * ) JERRY E. KNOTTS; ELECTRONIC ) ARTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) DBA EA Sports; PROCTER & ) GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO.;) VIACOM INC., a Delaware ) corporation; VIACOM ) INTERNATIONAL INC., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendants - Appellees. ) ) Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 8, 2014 ** Pasadena, California 

# FILED

APR 22 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Before: FERNANDEZ, N.R. SMITH, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Ron G. Voss appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Jerry E. Knotts, Electronic Arts, Inc., Proct er & Gamble Manufacturing Co., Viacom Inc., and Viacom International Inc. (coll ectively “Knotts”) on the basis that Voss lacked standing to pursue the action. We affirm. The district court did not err when it determined that because Voss had not listed his alleged copyright in his bankruptcy schedules, ownership of the asset 1 remained in the bankruptcy estate 2 and he lacked standing to pursue this action. 3 Only the trustee of the bankruptcy estate would have standing. See 11 U.S.C. § 323(b); Estate of Spirtos v. Superior Court Case , 443 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006). There is no basis to substitute the trustee in bankruptcy for Voss now, on appeal. Voss is not disabled from pursuing his appeal, and he has done so. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(b); Sable Commc’ns of Cal., Inc. v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. , 890

1 See Range Rd. Music, Inc. v. E. Coast Foods, Inc. , 668 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir. 2012).

2 See Cusano v. Klein , 264 F.3d 936, 945–46 (9th Cir. 2001); Stein v. United Artists Corp. , 691 F.2d 885, 893 (9th Cir. 1982); see also Rousey v. Jacoway , 544 U.S. 320, 325, 125 S. Ct. 1561, 1565, 161 L. Ed. 2d 563 (2005).
3 See Cusano , 264 F.3d at 945; Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. JZ, L.L.C. (In re JZ, L.L.C.) , 371 B.R. 412, 418 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007). 2F.2d 184, 191 n.13 (9th Cir. 1989). Moreove r, a substitution of parties would not change the fact that the district court did not err. We deny the motion to substitute. AFFIRMED; motion DENIED.

3
-----Original Message----- 

From: DR.GOVER@GMAIL.COM [mailto:DR.GOVER@GMAIL.COM] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

David Gover 

1216 VFW Parkway #43 

West Roxbury, MA 02132
[Hillsborough,

June, 1880.]

#### Rueter *& a. v.*Howe.

*Osgood*and *Morrison $ Bartlett,*for the plaintiffs.

*Patten,*for the defendant.

*579Assumpsit. The defendant authorized the plaintiffs to deliver ale to one Donahoe, during the next twelve months after September 4, 1877, not exceeding the amount of $500, and promised to pay them for it if Donahoe did not. During the twelve months the plaintiffs delivered to Donahoe $500 worth of ale, for which he paid them; and afterwards, during the same twelve months, they delivered to him more than $7,000 worth, for some of which he has not paid them. The plaintiffs having been paid for what they delivered on the defendant’s authorization, judgment was ordered for the defendant.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# C_2014045EN.01001601.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — Nordecon AS, Ramboll Eesti AS v Rahandusministeerium

(Case C-561/12) (1)

1

(Public procurement - Negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice - Whether possible for the contracting authority to negotiate on tenders which do not comply with the mandatory requirements of the technical specifications relating to the contract)

2014/C 45/28

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Nordecon AS, Ramboll Eesti AS

Appellants:

Respondents: Rahandusministeerium

Respondents:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Riigikohus — Interpretation of Article 30(2) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Negotiated procedure with publication of a contract notice — Whether or not possible for the contracting authority to enter into negotiations on tenders that do not satisfy the mandatory requirements of the technical specifications set out in the contract documents — Technical specifications amended during the negotiations — Whether the public contract may be awarded to a tenderer submitting a tender that does not meet those technical specifications.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 30(2) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts does not allow the contracting authority to negotiate with tenderers tenders that do not comply with the mandatory requirements laid down in the technical specifications of the contract.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 9.2.2013.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0564

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 12, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2022

08/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0564
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of SBIR/STTIR Applications; RFA AA-07-009/10.                    

*Date:*                         August 13, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, RM 3045, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-2861,                         *marmillotp@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 20, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3667 Filed 7-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 175.31 Reports of discrepancies. ( a ) Each person who discovers a discrepancy, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, relative to the shipment of a hazardous material following its acceptance for transportation aboard an aircraft shall, as soon as practicable, notify the nearest FAA Regional Office by telephone or electronically. The nearest Regional Office may be located by calling the FAA Washington Operations Center 202-267-3333 (any hour). Electronic notifications may be submitted by following instructions on the FAA's website. The following information must be provided: ( 1 ) Name and telephone number of the person reporting the discrepancy.
( 2 ) Name of the aircraft operator.
( 3 ) Specific location of the shipment concerned.
( 4 ) Name of the shipper.
( 5 ) Nature of discrepancy.
( 6 ) Address of the shipper or person responsible for the discrepancy, if known, by the air carrier.
( b ) Discrepancies which must be reported under paragraph (a) of this section are those involving hazardous materials which are improperly described, certified, labeled, marked, or packaged, in a manner not ascertainable when accepted under the provisions of § 175.30(a) of this subchapter including packages or baggage which are found to contain hazardous materials subsequent to their being offered and accepted as other than hazardous materials.
[71 FR 14604, Mar. 22, 2006, as amended at 85 FR 83402, Dec. 21, 2020]