alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

          We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration
          Statement No. 333-32165 of Avondale Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 of
          our report dated February 20, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report
          on  Form  10-K  of Avondale Industries, Inc.  for  the  year  ended
          December 31, 1997.

          /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
          -------------------------
              DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

          New Orleans, Louisiana
          March 20, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (240)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,241
<PP&E>                                          16,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,456
<BONDS>                                          5,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,286
<SALES>                                         18,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,477
<CGS>                                           12,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     82
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 65
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        65
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40406

Conference Calendar

 

PAUL STURGEON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J.D. MADER, Captain,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-99-CV-725

--------------------

October 17, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Paul Sturgeon, Texas prisoner # 689133, challenges the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under Heck

v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and Edwards v. Balisok, 520

U.S. 641 (1997). He has failed to show the denial of a

constitutional right. See Madison v. Parker, 104 F.3d 765, 767-

68 (5th Cir. 1997); Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 958-59 (5th

Cir. 2000). Because Sturgeon has failed to show that the
No. 00-40406

-2-

district court erred in dismissing his civil rights complaint,

the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Sturgeon has also filed motions for the appointment of

counsel on appeal and for leave to file a supplemental brief. 

These motions are DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED.
#### Edward W. S. Johnston, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of Joseph Hughes, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Martin T. Garvey, Appellant.

Reported below, 139 App. Div. 659.

(Argued September 26, 1910;

decided October 4, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial *556department, entered July 19, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract to purchase real property.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous and that the record presented no exceptions which could be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.

*Benjamin E. Messier*for motion.

*Joseph Gr. Engel*and *Isaae V. Schavrien*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
----

**TABLE      OF CONTENTS**

**                                                                                                                            Page**

----

**TABLE      OF CONTENTS (Continued)**

----

**TABLE      OF CONTENTS (Continued)**

----

**TABLE      OF CONTENTS (Continued)**

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
unlimited_ex105.htm


EXHBIT 10.5


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





I,
Richard D. Crowley, Jr. of Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (the “Company”),
pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge
that:





(i)  
 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 27, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





(ii)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
November 5,
2009                                                                                   
  /s/
RICHARD D. CROWLEY, JR.


Richard D. Crowley,
Jr.


Chief
Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending March 9, 2013

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|COMMUNITY TRUST BANK            | * Branch       | Community Trust Bank, Choudrant, Louisiana, to establish a branch to be located at 384 East Stacy Road, Allen, Texas 75002.       | Newspaper:03/01/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | 03/01/2013    
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable
|R CORP FINANCIAL                | * 3A1          | R Corp Financial, Round Rock, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of R Bank, Round Rock, Texas.      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/18/2013 
|Newspaper:                      | Not available 
|Federal Register:               | 03/18/2013    
|TEXAS HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3          | Texas Heritage Bancshares, Inc., Hondo, Texas, to acquire 100 percent of the common stock of Uvalde National Bank, Uvalde, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/04/2013 
|Newspaper:                      | Not available 
|Federal Register:               | 04/04/2013    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1724 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1724

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that any Federal 
  employee serving under a temporary appointment who has completed at 
 least 1 year of service in such position within the preceding 2 years 
shall be eligible for the Government's health benefits program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1995

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that any Federal 
  employee serving under a temporary appointment who has completed at 
 least 1 year of service in such position within the preceding 2 years 
shall be eligible for the Government's health benefits program, and for 
                            other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 8913(b) of title 5, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) an employee who is occupying a position on a 
        temporary basis, if such employee has, in the aggregate, 
        completed the equivalent of at least 1 year of service in such 
        position within the preceding 2 years.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--(1) Section 8906a of 
title 5, United States Code, is repealed.
    (2) The table of sections for chapter 89 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 8906a.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and any change in 
contributions payable by or on behalf of an individual to the Employees 
Health Benefits Fund (described in section 8909 of title 5, United 
States Code) as a result of the enactment of this Act shall take effect 
as of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after such date.
    (b) Creditability of Prior Service.--Service performed before the 
effective date of this Act may be taken into account for purposes of 
the amendment made by section 1(a).
                                 <all>
```
#### Underwood *v.*Bailey.

Land cannot be compulsorily appropriated for a highway that would not accommodate the public.

Appeal from the decision of selectmen, on a petition for laying-out a highway hi Lancaster, for the benefit of the defendant, and from the assessment of damages. In October, 1871, the selectmen, upon the petition of the defendant, laid out a highway over land of the plaintiff, and awarded damages to him for the land taken for the same. The plaintiff duly claimed an appeal, which was referred to the county commissioners, who reported “ that in their opinion said highway is for the sole accommodation and benefit of the defendant, and not for the accommodation of the public ; and that, if in the opinion of the court the selectmen had a legal right to lay out said highway, they affirm the decision of the selectmen, both in the laying out of the same and the award of damages.”

*Benton*and *W. 3f H. Heywood,*for the plaintiff.

*Ray, Drew Sf Jordan,*for the defendant. ,

Foster, J.

This case is determined by the report of the commissioners that the highway “ is for the sole accommodation and *481benefit of the defendant, and not for the accommodation of the public.” It is settled beyond all controversy that “ individual property can be compulsorily appropriated by the public only for public use.” Dillon Mun. Corp., *s.*460; Cooley Const. Lim. 530. “ The appellant cannot be deprived of his property except for a public purpose.” Cushing, *C.*J., in *Underwood*v. Bailey, 56 N. H. 187, 190.

*Petition dismissed.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### William Menasco v. The State.

*No. 191.*

*Decided February 17.*

Breach of the Peace—Information.—Where an information for a breach of the peace alleged that the accused did unlawfully, in the presence and hearing of the prosecutor, call said prosecutor a damned son-of-a-bitch, *held,*that it was sufficient, though not further charging in the statutory terms that said language was used “ concerning him” (the prosecutor).

Appeal from the County Court of Donley. Tried below before Hon. B. H. White, County Judge.

Appellant was convicted under an information charging him with a breach of the peace, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $5.

A motion to arrest the judgment for insufficiency of the information was overruled. The motion was based upon the failure of the information to aver that the language used was used “ concerning him,” the prosecutor, those terms being used in the statutory definition of the offense. The information is set out in full in the opinion.

*Browning & Madden,*for appellant.

*B. L. Henry,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Omitting the formal portions, the information charges, that defendant “ did then and there unlawfully use, in the pres*583ence aucl hearing of J. A. Fuson, violently abusive language to the said J. A. Fuson, to-wit, the said William Menasco did then and there unlawfully call the said J. A. Fuson a damned son-of-a-bitch; and the said abusive language was used by the said William Menasco to the said J. A. Fuson in the presence and hearing of said J. A. Fuson; and the said abusive language was reasonably calculated to provoke a breach of the peace, under the circumstances the said abusive language was used by the said Menasco. Against the peace and dignity of the State.”

Motion in arrest of judgment is based upon the omission of the statutory expression “ concerning him ” from the information. By the averments said information charges that the language was used in the presence, hearing, and to the said Fuson, and it was evidently “ concerning him,” appellant calling him, said Fuson, “a damned son-of-a-bitch.” This sufficiently avers the language used was “ concerning him.” Code Crim. Proc., arts. 428a, 428o. A conviction had upon the pleading can be plead successfully in bar of another prosecution for the same offense. Code Crim. Proc., art. 422; Willson’s Crim. Proc., secs. 1959, 1960, 1970, 1984.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
1 

## NO. 12

- 21

- 00033

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BRIAN CRAIG STEVENS O N

, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 321ST

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

T his appeal is being di smissed for fa i lure t o comply wi th a re qui rement of the appe llate

rules , a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a
specified time

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the ap pellate rules from paying costs mus t pay

- -

at the time an item i s presente d for filing

-- w hatever fees ar e required by s t a tute or Texas
Supreme Court order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 ; see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 . An appellate c ourt may

enforce Ru l e 5 by any order that is ju st. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5

. A fte r givi n g t en days ’ notice , a n appella te court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply wit h a requiremen t

o f the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice fro m the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a speci fied ti me. T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

On March 2 , 2 021

, the C lerk of this Court notified Appellant , Brian Craig Stevenson, that
the filing fee in t h is appeal is due and th at the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was
not paid on or before March 12

. The date for remi tti ng the fi lin g fee p asse d

, and Appell a nt ha s2 not responded to this Court ’ s notice, paid the filing fee

, or otherwise s hown that he is excu sed
from paying the fee

. 1

Be cause Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is di smissed

. Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c )

. All pending motion s are over ruled as moo t

. Opinion delivered March 19 , 2021.
Panel c onsisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Appellant is acting pro se ; however, pro se litigants a re held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with all applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigan ts would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P. , No. 12

- 16

- 00189

- CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 (Tex. App.

— Tyler June 21

, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).3 

## COURT OF APPEALS

T WELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

M A RCH 1 9 , 2021

NO. 12

- 21

- 00033

- CV

BRIAN CRAIG STEVENSON , Appellant V. T HE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 321st District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 13

- 0825

- D )

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appe llate r ecor d; and the same bein g considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this app eal should be dismiss ed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
this appeal be, and the sam e is, her e by dismissed ; a nd that this decision be certif ied to the court

below f o r observance.
By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
#### § 1247.1 Annual Report of Cars Loaded and Cars Terminated.

Beginning with the reporting period commencing January 1, 2001, and annually thereafter, each Class I railroad shall file Form STB-54, Annual Report of Cars Loaded and Cars Terminated, together with the accompanying certification, with the Office of Economics, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC, within 90 days after the end of the reporting year. Blank forms and instructions are available on the Board's web site (*www.stb.gov*) or can be obtained by contacting the Office of Economics.

[66 FR 1052, Jan. 5, 2001, as amended at 81 FR 8857, Feb. 23, 2016; 83 FR 15080, Apr. 9, 2018]
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

97-929.

#### State v. McNeill.

Lorain App. No. 95CA006158. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 438, 700 N.E.2d 596. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1162 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM186AD

737 -53A1279 --- 12/18/07 SRM 53 -00 - 07 --- 11/10/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

              In connection with the Annual Report of County Bank Corp on form
              10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
              "Report"), I Curt Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
              certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
              2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The Information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

              /s/ Curt Carter
              ---------------
              Curt Carter
              Chief Executive Officer
              March 25, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

J. DOUGLAS FARRELL,

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LOUIS J. FARRELL,

Petitioner

v.

ROBERT T. REGOLA, III AND JANETTE A. REGOLA, HIS WIFE, AND ROBERT T. REGOLA, IV,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 491 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justices Wecht and Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of

this matter.