alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 22
- 7216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O ’ Grady, Senior District Judge. ( 1:18

- cr - 00231

- LO

- 1 ; 1:20

- cv - 01596

- LO ; 1:17

- cr - 00172

- LO

- 1 ; 1:20

- cv - 01598

- LO )

Submitted : March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023 USCA4 Appeal: 22-7215 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Ibukun Oginni , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7215 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Michael Ibukun Oginni seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Oginni has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny certificate s of appealability and dismiss the appeal s . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7215 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           43826
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    228,283
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,808
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           247,091
<LOANS>                                         928296
<ALLOWANCE>                                      16560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1236541
<DEPOSITS>                                     1006465
<SHORT-TERM>                                     98949
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              14353
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      116701
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,236,541
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  83800
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                15204
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 99034
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               44254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6167
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            48613
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     7333
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  97
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  27239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  20769
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       20769
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.79
<LOANS-NON>                                      12716
<LOANS-PAST>                                        96
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 15847
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     7333
<RECOVERIES>                                       713
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                16560
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             16560
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 31, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PATRIOT FINANCIAL PARTNERS LP | CIC           | Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, GP, LLC, Patriot Financial Managers, L.P., Patriot Financial Manager, LLC. and Messrs. Ira M. Lubert, W. Kirk Wycoff and James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to purchase up to 24.9 percent of Porter Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, KY. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/21/2011
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 09/21/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Gray *v.*Gillespie.

A writ of entry on a mortgage can be maintained before there has been any breach of the condition.

Writ oe Entry, on a mortgage. Plea, the general issue, with a brief statement that the condition of the mortgage has not been broken. Motion to reject the brief statement.

*Burrows*Jewell, for the plaintiff.

*Burleigh $ Adams,*for the defendant.

In an action counting upon a seizin in fee and in mortgage, the judgment must be conditional. G. L., *c.*232, *s.*12; *Aiken*v. *Gale,*37 N. H. 501; *McDaniel*v. *Cater,*21 N. H. 229; *Briggs*v. *Sholes,*14 N. H. 266.

Bingham, J.

It is provided by Gen. Laws, *c.*232, s. 12, that in actions on mortgages the judgment shall be conditional, that if the mortgageor pays to the mortgagee the sum the court shall adjudge due, within two months after judgment rendered, with interest, the judgment shall be void. The defendant claims that this provision applies to all actions upon mortgages, and that, if nothing is due on the mortgage debt, no action can be maintained because no judgment can be rendered. This statute, almost in its present *470form, has existed in j;his state for a longer period than is covered by our reported cases. We are unable to find an instance in which the court has intimated such a construction as the defendant claims. A mortgage vests the seizin of the estate in the mortgagee, and he may at any time enter upon the mortgageor, and take and retain possession of the premises for the purpose of receiving the rents and profits until the condition is performed. *Brown*v. *Cram,*1 N. H. 169; *Hartshorn*v. Hubbard, 2 N. H. 453; *Hunt*v. Stiles, 10 N. H. 466; *Dearborn*v. *Dearborn,*9 N. H., 117; *Ellison*v. *Daniels,*11 N. H. 274; *Smith*v. *Moore,*11 N. H. 55, 61; *Chellis*v. *Stearns,*22 N. H. 312. In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage, the judgment must be conditional. But in this case, the mortgagee, being entitled to the possession of the premises in order that he may take the rents and profits, can maintain his actjon. *Hobart*v. *Sanborn,*13 N. H. 226.

*Oase discharged.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
§ 174.750 Incidents involving leakage. ( a ) In addition to the incident reporting requirements of §§ 171.15 and 171.16 of this subchapter, the carrier shall also notify the offeror at the earliest practicable moment following any incident in which there has been breakage, spillage, or suspected radioactive contamination involving Class 7 (radioactive) materials shipments. Transport vehicles, buildings, areas, or equipment in which Class 7 (radioactive) materials have been spilled may not be again placed in service or routinely occupied until the radiation dose rate at every accessible surface is less than 0.005 mSv per hour (0.5 mrem per hour) and there is no significant removable radioactive surface contamination (see § 173.443 of this subchapter).
( b ) The package or materials should be segregated as far as practicable from personnel contact. If radiological advice or assistance is needed, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) should also be notified. In case of obvious leakage, or if it appears likely that the inside container may have been damaged, care should be taken to avoid inhalation, ingestion, or contact with the Class 7 (radioactive) material. Any loose Class 7 (radioactive) materials should be left in a segregated area and held pending disposal instructions, from qualified persons.
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-42, 48 FR 10245, Mar. 10, 1983; Amdt. 174-61, 51 FR 34987, Oct. 1, 1986; Amdt. 174-65, 53 FR 38274, Sept. 29, 1988; Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52684, Dec. 21, 1990; Amdt. 174-80, 60 FR 50332, Sept. 28, 1995]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending February 5, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIVE POINTS BANK  | * 18C          | Five Points Bank, Grand Island, Nebraska, to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the LaVista, Nebraska branch of First State Bank, Gothenberg, Nebraska. | Newspaper:02/18/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 02/18/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COLORADO CMNTY BK, YUMA, COLORADO     | 132853  | 10/12/2010 | 01/20/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|CORNERSTONE BK, OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS | 3027763 | 10/25/2010 | 01/20/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|FIRST CMNTY BK, EMPORIA, KANSAS       | 152851  | 11/01/2010 | 01/26/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1122.11 Rights of witnesses. ( a ) Any person who is compelled or requested to furnish documentary evidence or testimony in a Board-Initiated Investigation shall, upon request, be shown the Order of Investigation. Copies of Orders of Investigation shall not be furnished, for their retention, to such persons requesting the same except with the express approval of the Chairman.
( b ) Any person compelled to appear, or who appears in person at a Board-Initiated Investigation by request or permission of the Investigating Officer may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel, as provided by the Board's regulations.
( c ) The right to be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel shall mean the right of a person testifying to have an attorney present with him during any aspect of a Board-Initiated Investigation and to have this attorney advise his client before, during and after the conclusion of such examination.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 22, 1995 (70), Para 70.12 Reported Bills Sequentially Referred]
[Page 804]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.70.12  reported bills sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X, bills and reports were delivered to the 
Clerk for printing, and bills referred as follows:

  [Pursuant to the order of the House on May 18, 1995, the following 
                   report was filed on May 19, 1995]

       Mr. GILMAN: Committee on International Relations. H.R. 
     1561. A bill to consolidate the foreign affairs agencies of 
     the United States; to authorize appropriations for the 
     Department of State and related agencies for fiscal years 
     1996 and 1997; to responsibly reduce the authorizations of 
     appropriations for United States foreign assistance programs 
     for fiscal years 1996 and 1997, and for other purposes, with 
     an amendment; referred to the Committee on Judiciary for a 
     period ending not later than May 20, 1995, for consideration 
     of such provisions of the amendment recommended by the 
     Committee on International Relations as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(j), rule 
     X (Rept. No. 104-128, Pt. 1). Ordered to be printed.
```
Exhibit 10.11

                         GRAND HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.
                       1990 WESTWOOD BOULEVARD, PENTHOUSE
                              LOS ANGELES, CA 90025


                               September 26, 2004


Mr. Harry Shuster
1990 Westwood Boulevard, Third Floor
Los Angeles, California  90025

Dear Mr. Shuster:

      When   countersigned  by  you  below,  this  letter  will  set  forth  our
understanding and constitute our agreement as to the following:

      As of September 26, 2004, Grand Havana  Enterprises,  Inc. (the "Company")
is  indebted  to you in the total  amount  of  $2,435,050.42,  which  represents
$1,722,974.31  in principal and $712,076.11 in unpaid interest accrued as of the
date hereof,  as a result of that certain  Promissory Note, dated March 1, 2004,
in the principal amount of $2,500,900.81  (the "Outstanding  Promissory  Note").
You hereby acknowledge and agree that the Outstanding  Promissory Note is hereby
cancelled and  terminated  effective as of the date hereof,  without any further
liability or obligations by the Company  thereunder  and, in  consideration  for
such  cancellation  and  termination,  the  Company  will  issue  to  you a new,
unsecured promissory note in the amount of $2,435,050.42.

      This  letter  agreement  may be executed  in two or more  counterparts  by
original or facsimile  signature,  each of which when so executed will be deemed
to be an original,  and all of which  together will be deemed to constitute  one
and the same agreement.

<PAGE>

      If the  foregoing  is in  accordance  with your  understanding,  please so
indicate by signing where  provided  below and returning one  fully-signed  copy
hereof to us,  whereupon this letter will  constitute an agreement fully binding
on the parties  hereto in accordance  with its terms under the laws of the State
of California.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        GRAND HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
                                        a Delaware corporation


                                        By: /s/ Stanley Shuster
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Stanley Shuster
                                            Title:    President


                                        AGREED AND ACCEPTED:


                                        By: /s/ Harry Shuster
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Harry Shuster


                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         235,324
<SECURITIES>                                 1,313,312
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,131,004
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,131,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,031,618
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,105,074)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,131,004
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (65,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (65,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0973 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 39 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2013 - 0163 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:April 15, 2008By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director