alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals for research to be conducted or supported by a Federal department or agency. ( a ) The department or agency head will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Federal department or agency through such officers and employees of the Federal department or agency and such experts and consultants as the department or agency head determines to be appropriate. This evaluation will take into consideration the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
( b ) On the basis of this evaluation, the department or agency head may approve or disapprove the application or proposal, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 29, 1995 (52), Para 52.11 Recorded Vote]
[Page 514]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.52.11  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment in the nature of a substitute 
submitted by Mr. INGLIS:

       Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the 
     following:
     That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the 
     Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to 
     all intents and purposes as a part of the Constitution when 
     ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 
     States within seven years from the date of its submission to 
     the States by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

       ``Section 1. No person who has been elected for a full term 
     to the Senate two times shall be eligible for election or 
     appointment to the Senate. No person who has been elected for 
     a full term to the House of Representatives three times shall 
     be eligible for election to the House of Representatives.
       ``Section 2. No person who has served as a Senator for more 
     than three years of a term to which some other person was 
     elected shall subsequently be eligible for election to the 
     Senate more than once. No person who has served as a 
     Representative for more than one year shall subsequently be 
     eligible for election to the House of Representatives more 
     than two times.
       ``Section 3. No election or service occurring before this 
     article becomes operative shall be taken into account when 
     determining eligibility for election under this article.''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

114

negative

Nays

316
```
#### § 1103.19 Advising upon the merits of a client's cause.

A practitioner shall try to obtain full knowledge of his client's cause before advising thereon. The practitioner shall give a candid opinion of the merits and probable result of bringing the case or of any related pending or contemplated litigation. The practitioner shall beware of bold and confident assurances to clients, especially where employment may depend upon such assurances. Whenever a fair settlement can be reached, the client shall be advised to avoid or to end litigation.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 19, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27679; Airspace Docket No. 07-ACE-4


Modification of Class E Airspace; Marshalltown, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E Airspace at Marshalltown, IA.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, July 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT 
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on May 16, 2007 (72 
FR 27416). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on July 5, 2007. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 4, 2007.
Walter Tweedy,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Area.
[FR Doc. 07-2995 Filed 6-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 15, 2007, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Agilix, Orem, UT; Florida Virtual Schools, Orlando, FL; Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA; Sungard Higher Education, Malvern, PA; and Sun Microsystems, Inc., Broomfield, CO have been added as parties to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 16, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 7, 2007 (72 FR 25781).                 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. 

[FR Doc. 07-3592 Filed 7-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 31

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Meriwether, President, CEO, Secretary/Treasurer of Oak Ridge Micro-
Energy, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Annual Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Annual Report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Annual Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Annual Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Annual Report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          My evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.


Dated: 03-30-06           Signature:  /s/Mark Meriwether
       --------                       -------------------------
                                      Mark Meriwether
                                      President, CEO, Secretary/Treasurer
THIEATSOEWEY~GENFXAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711 April 

### 13, 1966

Honorable Jules Damiani, Jr. Opinion No. 

### c-657 Criminal DistrictAttorney Galveston County Re: Galveston, Texas Payment of inveetigation and expert testimony exDear Mr. Damlani: penses incurred for an examining trial. In a recent opinion request of this office you pose the following question:

Does Article 26.05 (c),Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure of Texas, 

### 1966, apply so as to provide payment for expenses incurred for thepurposes of investigationand expert testimony by an appointed counsel Infanexamining trial. Article 26.05, v.c.c.P., 

### 1966,provides, inpertinent part, as follows:

"Section 1. A counsel appointed to defend a person accused of a felony or a misdemeanorpunishable by lmprisonment shall be paid from the general fund of the county In which the prosecutionwas instituted according to the following schedule: (c) For expenses Incurred for,purposes of investigationand expert tcstyony, not more than $250.00;

. . . Article 16.01, Code of Criminal Procedure, 

### 1966,provides, among other things, that a magistrate has the authority to appoint counsel to represent an accused in an examining trial. InAttorney General's Opinion No. C-654, datedApril 12, 

### 1966,this office held that an attorneys appointed to represent an accused in an examining trial was entitled to be compensated for his work In accordancewith Article 26.05. It is our opinion, therefore, thatArticle 26.05, (c) is applicable to examining trials and counsel who incur

-3177-Honorable Jules Damiani, Jr.,page 2 (C-657)

expenses for investigationand expert testimony in an examining trial are entitled to be reimbursed in accordance with theprovisions of Article 26.05. SUMMARY ------- Article 26.05 (c),Code of Criminal Procedure, 1966, applies to examining trials,and counsel who incur expenses for investigationand expert testimonyare entitled to be reimbursed therefor in accordancewith saidArticle. Yours very truly, WAGGONFR CARR Attorney General of Texas

BY I(11 A%s~an~YAttorney Ge era1 SK/lb

OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Robert E. Owen Howard Fender Douglas Chilton ThomasMack APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. Wright

.

-31 m-
§ 76.27-25 Power and circuitry. ( a ) The power supply and emergency power supply for all fire detection and alarm systems must be in accordance with 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter J (Electrical Engineering). At the end of the required period for which the fire detection and alarm system must remain operable under emergency power, the system must remain capable of operating all audible and visual fire alarm signals for an additional period of 30 minutes.
( b ) All wiring and electrical circuits and equipment must be in accordance with 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter J (Electrical Engineering).
( c ) All fire detection and alarm systems must monitor power supplies and circuits necessary for the operation of the system during loss of power and fault conditions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date and Time:

Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

This Meeting Will be Open to the Public. 

# Items to be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Advisory Opinion 2007-09: Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc., and Kerry Edwards 2004 General Election Legal and Accounting Compliance (“GELAC”) Fund.

Report of the Audit Division on Ted Poe for Congress.

Management and Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-3567 Filed 7-18-07; 2:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-07-M
#### Same *v.*William J. Lepine, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT W ILLIAM SC HM IDT, C ounty Prose c utor, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-36089 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-01116-M JP M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington M arsha J. Pe c hm an, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 17, 2015 * * B e fore : O’ SC ANNLAIN, LEAVY, a n d FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Taxpa y e r W illia m Sc hm idt a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism issing his ac tion a lle ging the ft a nd c onve rsion by

a re ve nue a g e nt of the Inte rna l R e ve nue Se rvic e . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e 

# F IL ED MAR 04 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w de novo. Orff v . Unite d State s , 358 F.3d 1137, 1142 (9th C ir. 2004) (que stions of sovere ign im m unity and subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion); C lamor v
. Unite d State s , 240 F.3d 1215, 1216-17 (9th C ir. 2001) (c e rtific ation unde r 28 U.S.C . § 2679(d)(2)). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly de nie d Sc hm idt’ s m otion to re m and be c a u se the Attorne y Ge ne ra l c e rtifie d tha

t the a ge nt wa s a

n e m ploy e e of the Inte rna l R e ve nue Se rvic e , a nd wa s a c ting within the

sc ope of his e m

ploy m e nt during the

inc ide nts de sc ribe d in Sc hm idt’ s c om pla int. Se e28 U.S.C . § 2679(d)(2); O sborn v . Hale

y , 549 U.S. 225, 231 (2007) (“ [C ] e rtific ation is c onc lusive for purpose s of re m ova l, i.e ., onc e c e rtific ation a

nd re m ova l a

re e ffe c te d, e xc lusive c om pe te n c e to a djudic ate the c a se re s ide s in thefe de ra l c ourt, a nd tha t c ourt m ay

not re m and the suit to the sta te c ourt.” ); Billings v. Unite d State s , 57 F.3d 797, 800 (9th C ir. 1995) (Attorne y Ge ne ra l c e rtific at ion is prima fa c ie e vide n c e that a

fe de ra l e m

p loy e e wa s a c ting in the sc ope of his e m ploy m e nt at the tim e of the inc ide nt). The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d Sc hm idt’ s a c t ion be c a use Sc hm idt fa ile d to show tha

t the Unite d State s ha s wa ive d its sovere i gn im m unity from

suit. Se e28 U.S.C . § 2680(c ) (e xc luding from the Fe de ra l Tort C la i m s Ac t “ [a ] ny c la im arising in re spe c t o f the a sse ssm e nt or c olle c tion of a ny tax” ). AFFIRM E D.
1 2 - 3 6 0 8 9 2
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1943

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem

certain municipal wastewater treatment facilities discharging into ocean waters as the equivalent of secondary

treatment facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1943 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Diego Coastal

3 Corrections Act of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. COASTAL DISCHARGES.

5 Section 304(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Con6 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1314(d)) is amended by adding at the

7 end the following:

8 ‘‘(5) COASTAL DISCHARGES.—For purposes of

9 this subsection, any municipal wastewater treatment

10 facility shall be deemed the equivalent of a second11 ary treatment facility if each of the following re12 quirements is met:

13 ‘‘(A) The facility employs chemically en14 hanced primary treatment.

15 ‘‘(B) The facility, on the date of the enact16 ment of this paragraph, discharges through an

17 ocean outfall into an open marine environment

18 greater than 4 miles offshore into a depth

19 greater than 300 feet.

20 ‘‘(C) The facility’s discharge is in compli21 ance with all local and State water quality

22 standards for the receiving waters.

23 ‘‘(D) The facility’s discharge will be sub24 ject to an ocean monitoring program acceptable
3

•HR 1943 RFS

1 to relevant Federal and State regulatory

2 agencies.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
** **

UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE****ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended March 31, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES****EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-12438

 

**REALESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President  FinanceChief Financial OfficerApril 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
98-2383.

#### State ex rel. State Teachers Retirement Bd. v. W. Geauga Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Geauga App. Nos. 97-G-2066 and 97-G-2067.

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.