alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.45

Second Amendment andConsent to Guaranty and Security Agreement 

This Second Amendment and Consent toGuaranty and Security Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) is made as of this28th day of October, 2004 by and among Foundation Financial Services, Inc.,NationalCare® Marketing, Inc., Lifestyles Marketing Group, Inc., Precision DialingServices, Inc., Senior Benefits LLC and Westbridge Printing Services, Inc.(“WPS”) each as a “Grantor” and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC(formerly known as Credit Suisse First Boston Management Corporation) as “SecuredParty”. 

WITNESSETH 

WHEREAS, the Grantors and the SecuredParty are parties to the Guaranty and Security Agreement dated as of April 17, 2001 (the“Guaranty Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, Ascent Assurance, Inc. (the“Borrower”) and Secured Party are parties to that certain credit agreement datedas of April 17, 2001 (the “Credit Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, the Borrower desires to sell100% of the capital stock of WPS; 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Grantors andSecured Party hereby agree as follows: 

Section 1. Amendments. Uponsatisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 2 of this Second Amendment, effectiveas of the date hereof, the Guaranty Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

WPS is eliminated from the definitionof Grantor in the first paragraph of the Guaranty Agreement and all of its obligations asa Grantor under the Guaranty Agreement are terminated. 

Section 2. Conditions. Theeffectiveness of this Second Amendment is expressly conditioned upon receipt by SecuredParty of one or more copies of this Second Amendment executed by the Grantors. 

Section 3. Ratification.Except as modified above, all other terms and provisions of the Guaranty Agreement, andany other related agreements shall continue in full force and effect and are herebyratified and confirmed by each of the Grantors and the Secured Party. This SecondAmendment amends and shall be in addition to any previous amendments to the GuarantyAgreement executed by Secured Party. 

Section 5. Binding Effect.This Second Amendment shall be binding upon each of the Grantors and its successors andassigns and inure to the benefit of Secured Party and its successors and assigns. 

Section 6. Entire Agreement.This Second Amendment contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to thesubject matter hereof and supercedes all oral statements and prior writings with respectthereto. 

Section 7. Counterparts. ThisSecond Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, all of which taken togethershall constitute one instrument. 

Section 8. Governing Law. THISSECOND AMENDMENT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACT MADE UNDER AND GOVERNED BY THE INTERNALLAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF THE LAWS PRINCIPLESTHEREOF. 

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the partieshereto have caused this Second Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the dayand year first above written. 

GRANTORS: 
FOUNDATION FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

By /Benjamin M. Cutler/
98-2010.

#### Harp v. Cleveland Hts.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73171.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 14

- 00680

- C V

——————————— ELIZABETH COPELAND , Appellant

V.

BARRY COPELAND , Appellee

On Appeal from the 31 1 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2012

- 39055

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 12, 2015

, appellant was notified of intent to dismiss this appeal

for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief by March 6, 2015. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1)

. One further extension (appellant’s fifth extension) was granted

to March 11, 2015. To date, no appellate brief has been received.2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,

appellant’s failure to file a proper appellate brief and this Court’s notice, is of the

opinion this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.3(a).

We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle

.
#### Nora Lounsbury et al., Respondents, *v.*The Knights of the Maccabees of the World, Appellant.

*Lounsbury*v. *Knights of Maccabees,*128 App. Div. 394, affirmed.

(Argued October 3, 1910;

decided October 25, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 11, 1908, which sustained plaintiffs’ exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, and granted a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a certificate of life insurance.

*James M. E. O'Grady*for appellant.

*Iliram R. Wood*for respondents.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, J J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 1, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|IBERIABANK        | * Branch       | IBERIABANK, Lafayette, Louisiana, to establish a branch located at 1101 N. Congress Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida. | Newspaper:01/06/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 01/06/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00788-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R. AND T.R.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00015

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

We grant appellant’s motion for extension of time to file her brief. We order appellant’s 

brief due January 27, 2015. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be 

granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

TS -ZF02NT

Attachment No. 002

PMN Page 4a –

Section I.B.1.e.2 & .3 (Nature of Reaction)

PMN Pages 8/8a –

Section II.A.1.d (Manufacturing Process Description)CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

TS -ZF02NT

Attachment No. 002

PMN Page 4a –

Section I.B.1.e.2 & .3 (Nature of Reaction)

PMN Pages 8/8a –

Section II.A.1.d (Manufacturing Process Description)

- 2

-CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

TS -ZF02NT

Attachment No. 002

PMN Page 4a –

Section I.B.1.e.2 & .3 (Nature of Reaction)

PMN Pages 8/8a –

Section II.A.1.d (Manufacturing Process Description)

[ Circled numbers (e.g.

,  ) identify potential points of release to the environment and correspond to numbered

release points in column 1 of Section II.A.3 (PMN Page 9a) of the PMN form. Bracketed letters (e.g., [#A])

identify potential points of occupational exposure and correspond to potential occupational exposure points in

column 1 of Section II.A.2 (PMN Page 9) of the PMN form.]

]
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.310 Applicability. This subpart applies to: ( a ) Recognized classification societies; and
( b ) All U.S. flag vessels that are certificated for international voyages and are classed by a recognized classification society that is authorized by the Coast Guard to issue the applicable international certificate as specified in this subpart.
#### § 1249.1 Annual Report of Tare Weight Data.

Class I carriers, either individually or through AAR, shall annually file tare weight data, as detailed in the Annual Report of Tare Weight Data, with the Surface Transportation Board's Office of Economics no later than May 31 of each year. Forms and instructions are available at *www.stb.gov* and may also be obtained by contacting the Office of Economics.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING
PERIODIC REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(A)OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Gregory A. Wells, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 by NTS-Properties III and to which this certification
is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-Properties
III.

|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ Gregory A. Wells                     
|                                         
|Gregory A. Wells                         
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
|Officer of NTS Capital Corporation       
|                                         
|
§ 1570.201 Security Coordinator. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, each owner/operator identified in §§ 1580.1, 1582.1, and 1584.101 of this subchapter must designate and use a primary and at least one alternate Security Coordinator.
( b ) An owner/operator identified in § 1582.1(a)(2) of this subchapter (public transportation agency) that owns or operates a bus-only operation must designate and use a primary and at least one alternate Security Coordinator only if the owner/operator is identified in appendix A to part 1582 of this subchapter or is notified by TSA in writing that a threat exists concerning that operation.
( c ) An owner/operator identified in § 1580.1(a)(5) or § 1582.1(a)(4) of this subchapter (private rail car, tourist, scenic, historic, or excursion rail operations) must designate and use a primary and at least one alternate Security Coordinator, only if notified by TSA in writing that a threat exists concerning that type of operation.
( d ) The Security Coordinator and alternate(s) must be appointed at the corporate level.
( e ) Each owner/operator required to have a Security Coordinator must provide in writing to TSA the names, U.S. citizenship status, titles, phone number(s), and email address(es) of the Security Coordinator and alternate Security Coordinator(s) within 37 calendar days of the effective date of this rule, commencement of operations, or change in any of the information required by this section.
( f ) Each owner/operator required to have a Security Coordinator must ensure that at least one Security Coordinator— ( 1 ) Serves as the primary contact for intelligence information and security-related activities and communications with TSA. Any individual designated as a Security Coordinator may perform other duties in addition to the duties described in this section.
( 2 ) Is accessible to TSA on a 24 hours a day, 7 days a week basis.
( 3 ) Coordinates security practices and procedures internally and with appropriate law enforcement and emergency response agencies.
MOTION DOCKET

98-1074.

#### State v. Jalowiec.

Lorain App. No. 96CA006445. On motion for leave to proceed *pro se.*Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
§ 1018.4 Claims that are covered. ( a ) These procedures generally apply to any claim for payment of a debt which: ( 1 ) Results from activities of the Board including fees imposed under 49 CFR part 1002; or
( 2 ) Is referred to the Board for collection.
( b ) These procedures do not apply to: ( 1 ) A claim based on a civil monetary penalty for violation of a requirement of the Interstate Commerce Act or an order or regulation of the Board unless 49 CFR part 1021 provides otherwise;
( 2 ) A claim as to which there is an indication of fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor, or any other party having an interest in the claim;
( 3 ) A claim between Federal agencies; and
( 4 ) A claim once it becomes subject to salary offset which is governed by 5 U.S.C. 5514.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.31 Adjournment]
[Page 802]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.31  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. DORNAN, pursuant to the special order heretofore 
agreed to, at 8 o'clock and 14 minutes p.m., the House adjourned until 
12 o'clock noon on Monday, May 22, 1995.
```
<!-- //function makeArray0() {	for (i = 0; i<makeArray0.arguments.length; i++)	this[i] = makeArray0.arguments[i];}var days = new makeArray0("Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday");var months = new makeArray0('January','February','March','April','May','June','July','August','September','October','November','December');				function nths(day) {	if (day == 1 || day == 21 || day == 31) return 'st';	if (day == 2 || day == 22) return 'nd';	if (day == 3 || day == 23) return 'rd';	return 'th';}				function getCorrectedYear(year) {	year = year - 0;	if (year < 70) return (2000 + year);	if (year < 1900) return (1900 + year);	return year;}				function y2k(number) { 	return (number < 1000) ? number + 1900 : number;}				var last = document.lastModified;var date = new Date(last);var dateY2K = new Date(getCorrectedYear(date.getYear()),date.getMonth(),date.getDate());			document.write("Last updated on " + days[dateY2K.getDay()] + ", " + months[dateY2K.getMonth()] + " " + dateY2K.getDate() + nths(dateY2K.getDate()) + ", " + (y2k(dateY2K.getYear())) + "<br />");// First, strip off any URL variablesvar URLAddress = location.href.substring(0,(location.href.indexOf("?")>0)?location.href.indexOf("?"):location.href.length)// Remove characters outisde the printable range as well as "<" and ">" which may indicate tags.var newAddress = '';for (i=0;i<URLAddress.length;i++){ if ((URLAddress.charCodeAt(i) > 31 || URLAddress.charCodeAt(i) < 127) && URLAddress.charAt(i) != '>' && URLAddress.charAt(i) != '<')  newAddress = newAddress + URLAddress.charAt(i);}// write cleaned URLdocument.write("URL: " + newAddress);//-->
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000702276
<NAME>                         PS PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                      SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                             1
<CASH>                                                                769,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          85,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      854,000
<PP&E>                                                             58,194,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   (23,966,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     35,260,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               1,074,000
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                         13,308,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       35,260,000
<SALES>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    8,389,000
<CGS>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       3,212,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    1,868,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     1,855,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 1,855,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        1,855,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           24.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           24.23
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Alesandro Bellando et al., Defendants. Felix Bellando, as Executor of Alesandro Bellando, Deceased, Respondent.

*People*v. *Bellando,*137 App. Div. 777, 948, affirmed.

(Submitted June 1, 1910;

decided June 17, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 15, 1910, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside the forfeiture of a recognizance, the judgment entered, and the execution issued thereon, and granted said motion.

The following question was certified : *“*Can a judgment on a forfeited recognizance or bail bond be entered against a surety without action, where the surety was guilty of no breach of the condition of the bond during his life, and the surety died before the bond was forfeited, and the order of forfeiture was filed after his death ? ”

*Charles 8. Whitman, District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), for appellant.

*Archibald It. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Clarence I. Barber*of counsel), for City of New York.

*Arthur E. Kaulfuss*and *Joseph 2£. Callahan*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative on the opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below.

Concur: Gray, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissent: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight and Werner, JJ.
98-1943.

#### State v. Sherrills.

Cuyahoga App. No. 62067. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1446, 703 N.E.2d 326. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.33 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1977]
[Page 1111]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.33  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1977

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-182) the resolution (H. Res. 185) providing for consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1977) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1996, and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
§ 1562.27 Costs. ( a ) Each aircraft operator must pay a threat assessment fee of $15 for each passenger and crewmember whose information the aircraft operator submits to TSA in accordance with § 1562.23(d) of this part.
( b ) Each aircraft operator must pay to TSA the costs associated with carrying out this subpart, as provided in its DASSP.
( c ) All fees and reimbursement must be remitted to TSA in a form and manner approved by TSA.
( d ) TSA will not issue any refunds, unless any fees or reimbursement funds were paid in error.
( e ) If an aircraft operator does not remit to TSA the fees and reimbursement funds required under this section, TSA may decline to process any requests for authorization from the aircraft operator.