alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1503.607 Administrative law judges. ( a ) *Powers of an ALJ.* In accordance with the rules of this subpart, an ALJ may: ( 1 ) Give notice of, and hold, prehearing conferences and hearings.
( 2 ) Issue scheduling orders and other appropriate orders regarding discovery or other matters that come before him or her consistent with the rules of this subpart.
( 3 ) Administer oaths and affirmations.
( 4 ) Issue subpoenas authorized by law.
( 5 ) Rule on offers of proof.
( 6 ) Receive relevant and material evidence.
( 7 ) Regulate the course of the hearing in accordance with the rules of this subpart.
( 8 ) Hold conferences to settle or to simplify the issues on his or her own motion or by consent of the parties.
( 9 ) Rule on procedural motions and requests.
( 10 ) Make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and issue an initial decision.
( 11 ) Strike unsigned documents unless omission of the signature is corrected promptly after being called to the attention of the attorney or party.
( 12 ) Order payment of witness fees in accordance with § 1503.649.
( b ) *Limitations on the power of the ALJ.* ( 1 ) The ALJ may not: ( i ) Issue an order of contempt.
( ii ) Award costs to any party.
( iii ) Impose any sanction not specified in this subpart.
( iv ) Adopt or follow a standard of proof or procedure contrary to that set forth in this subpart.
( v ) Decide issues involving the validity of a TSA regulation, order, or other requirement under the U.S. Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act, or other law.
( 2 ) If the ALJ imposes any sanction not specified in this subpart, a party may file an interlocutory appeal of right pursuant to § 1503.631(c)(3).
( 3 ) This section does not preclude an ALJ from issuing an order that bars a person from a specific proceeding based on a finding of obstreperous or disruptive behavior in that specific proceeding.
( c ) *Disqualification.* The ALJ may disqualify himself or herself at any time. A party may file a motion, pursuant to § 1503.629(f)(6), requesting that an ALJ be disqualified from the proceedings.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CEDRIC LAVERT DAVIDSON,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00136-CR

Appeal from the

363rd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F-0725104-W)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a), which states that:

At any time before the appellate court’s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the

appeal upon the appellant’s motion. The appellant and his or her attorney must sign

the written motion to dismiss and file it in duplicate with the appellate clerk, who

must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.

Appellant and his attorney have filed and signed the motion to dismiss. This Court has not

issued an opinion in this cause, and the Clerk of this Court has forwarded a duplicate of this motion

to the District Clerk of Dallas County, Texas. As Appellant has complied with the requirements of

Rule 42.2(a), the Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s motion and concludes the motion

should be granted, and the appeal should be dismissed.

We therefore dismiss the appeal.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
December 18, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1782

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for election

day registration for elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1995

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

provide for election day registration for elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Election Day Registra5 tion Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION PROCEDURES FOR FEDERAL ELEC7 TIONS.

8 Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

9 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the

10 end the following new section:
2

•HR 1782 IH

1 ‘‘REGISTRATION PROCEDURES

2 ‘‘SEC. 323. (a) An individual who is otherwise eligible

3 to vote in an election for Federal office may register to

4 vote in the election at the appropriate polling place on the

5 date of the election.

6 ‘‘(b) Each State shall take such action as may be nec7 essary, with respect to elections for Federal office, to pro8 vide for maximum accessibility to registration offices and

9 forms.

10 ‘‘(c) The Commission shall, in consultation with the

11 chief election officers of the States, prescribe such regula12 tions as may be necessary to carry out this section. In

13 prescribing such regulations, the Commission shall, to the

14 maximum extent practicable, take into consideration the

15 need for uniformity in voter registration procedures in the

16 States.

17 ‘‘(d) This section shall not prevent any State from

18 providing greater access to voter registration than that

19 provided for under this section.’’.

20 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

21 The amendment made by section 2 shall apply with

22 respect to elections taking place after December 31, 1995.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000701288
<NAME>                        Atrion Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                   419
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                          9,393
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                           10,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      20,975
<PP&E>                                35,312
<DEPRECIATION>                         8,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        66,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  5,072
<BONDS>                               10,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 342
<OTHER-SE>                            42,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          66,838
<SALES>                               12,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      12,985
<CGS>                                  8,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          8,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       4,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          729
<INCOME-TAX>                             197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      532
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                             532
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.24


</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Boyd, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Boyd*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 38.]

(No. 98-1486

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Russell V. Leffler,*Huron County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that Irving C. Boyd is a sexually oriented offender is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 25, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2012 (April 1, 2012 - June 30, 2012)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Wadleigh *v.*Eaton.

A ward may be allowed an appeal from a probate decree, denying his petition for a revocation of his guardianship, when he was prevented from appealing through the misfortune of being unable to furnish an appeal bond, having no means to indemnify sureties, his property being in the hands of his guardian.

Petition, for leave to appeal from a decree of the probate court. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff, Achsah C. Wadleigh, is the defendant’s ward. Her petition for a revocation of the guardianship was dismissed by the probate court. She intended to take an appeal, and at her instance the judge fixed the amount of the appeal bond, but she was unable to obtain the required sureties, having no means to secure them, all her property being in the hands of her guardian. She was thereby prevented from appealing within the sixty days allowed for that purpose.

*A. F. L. Norris*and Hawthorne, for the plaintiff.

*Gould,*for the defendant.

Bingham, J.

Any person aggrieved by any probate decision, who was prevented from appealing within sixty days, through mistake, accident, or misfortune, and not from his own neglect, may be allowed an appeal. G. L., *e.*207, s. 7. The law having placed the plaintiff’s property under the control of her guardian, she was unable to give a bond, with sufficient sureties, as required by Gen. Laws, *c.*207, *s.*3. This was a misfortune. The court may exercise its discretion as to requiring the plaintiff to furnish security for costs. G. L., *c.*207, *s.*10. She will not be ordered to do so at this time'. The defendant has her property in his hands, and if he is finally entitled to costs they can be adjusted in the settlement of his account.

*Appeal allowed,.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         382,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  439,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,668,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,749,687
<PP&E>                                       2,113,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                 838,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,923,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,166,566
<BONDS>                                        510,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,862
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,232,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,923,897
<SALES>                                     27,188,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,188,800
<CGS>                                        7,099,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,099,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                507,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,331)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            519,547
<DISCONTINUED>                                (84,673)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   434,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties IV (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 14, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 14, 2008     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael J. Blumenfeld, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Collegiate Pacific Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Collegiate Pacific Inc. for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Collegiate Pacific Inc. Date: June 27, 2005
    /s/ Michael J. BlumenfeldMichael J. Blumenfeld,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer I, William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Collegiate Pacific Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Collegiate Pacific Inc. for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Collegiate Pacific Inc. Date: June 27, 2005
    /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### Seth M. Milliken, *Respondent, v.*Andrew McLean, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
#### James A. Hover, Administrator of Curtis Hover, *v.*The Pennsylvania Company, Lessee of the Pittsburg, Fort-Wayne and Chicago Railroad Company.

Motion for leave to file a petition in error.

*Isaiah Pillars,*for the motion.

*J. T. Brooks,*contra.

By the Court.

The act of March 25,1851 (8. & 0.1139),. allowing an action by the representatives of a party whose death was caused by the wrongful act of another, does not extend to cases where -the wrongful act which caused the death was committed outside the State of Ohio.

*Motion overruled*
#### § 97.37-13 Fire extinguishing system controls.

The control cabinets or spaces containing valves or manifolds for the various fire extinguishing systems must be distinctly marked in conspicuous red letters at least 2 inches high: “[STEAM/CARBON DIOXIDE/CLEAN AGENT/FOAM/WATER SPRAY—as appropriate] FIRE APPARATUS.”.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33881, June 7, 2012]
#### J. B. Brewster *&*Company, Respondent, *v.*John B. Terry, Appellant.—

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
§ 1152.30 General. ( a ) *Contents of subpart.* (1) 49 U.S.C. 10904 directs the Board to determine the extent to which the avoidable costs of providing rail service plus a reasonable return on the value of the line exceed the revenues attributable to the line. This subpart contains the methodology for such determinations and the standards necessary for application of those terms in the context of a particular proceeding. Such data will be used in reaching the Board's findings on the merits of an abandonment or discontinuance proceeding and in making the necessary financial assistance determinations. ( 2 ) This subpart also sets forth a method by which the carrier may establish its Forecast Year estimates and Estimated Subsidy Payment to be included in its application (§ 1152.22(d) of this part). Furthermore, an offeror of financial assistance may use this method to formulate a subsidy offer and/or Proposed Subsidy Payment under 49 U.S.C. 10904 and § 1152.27 of subpart C of this part.
( b ) *Data collection.* The owning or operating carrier shall establish a system to collect at branch level the data necessary to compute the base year data and the final subsidy payment. The collection and compilation of such data shall be in accordance with the Branch Line Accounting System (49 CFR part 1201, subpart B).
( c ) *Final payment of financial assistance.* ( 1 ) When a financial assistance agreement to subsidize is concluded, the final payment will be adjusted to reflect the actual revenues derived, avoidable costs incurred, and value of the properties used in the subsidy year.
( 2 ) Where an adjustment results in an increase in the Estimated Subsidy Payment upon which the financial assistance agreement is based, the amount of such increase is limited to 15 percent of the estimated payment. However, if the railroad notifies the subsidizer that the estimate will be exceeded by more than 15 percent in one of the Financial Status Reports (§ 1152.37) issued during the first 10 months of the subsidy year or the increase results from an expense preapproved by the subsidizer, the adjusted amount shall be included in the final payment.
[61 FR 67883, Dec. 24, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 8855, Feb. 23, 2016]
Office of Coast SurveyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration                            U.S. Department of Commerce 

        -              Home           
        -              Future of NOAA Charts                      - Future of NOAA Charts
          - Rescheming and Improving                ENCs
          - NOAA Custom                Charts
          - Farewell to                Traditional NOAA Charts 
        -              Charts                      - NOAA ENC®
          - ENC Rescheming                Status
          - Paper and Raster Charts
          - NOAA Custom Charts
          - Chart                Locator
          - ENC Viewer 
          - Historical Charts
          - Training                Charts
          - Chart Updates
          - Latest Editions
          - Chart Carriage Requirements 
        -              Publications                      - United States Coast                Pilot®
          - U.S. Chart No. 1 (Chart Symbols)
          - Distances                Between U.S. Ports
          - National Charting Plan
          - Sunsetting Traditional NOAA Paper Charts
          - Transforming the ENC
          - Coast Survey Ocean Mapping                Strategy
          - National                Hydrographic Survey Priorities
          - Standards and                Requirements
          - Coast                Survey Technical Documents
          - Techical                Memos
          - Technical                Reports 
        -              Data                      - Tools & Apps
          - Data Management
          - GIS Data & Services
          - nowCOAST™
          - Hydrographic Survey Data
          - BlueTopo™ Specifications
          - Wrecks and Obstructions Database
          - Current Year Survey Plans
          - U.S. Maritime Limits and                Boundaries
          - Tides & Currents 
        -              Learn                      - Nautical Cartography
          - Chart Source Data
          - Hydrographic Surveying
          - BlueTopo™
          - Coastal & Ocean Prediction Models
          - Precision Marine Navigation
          - Educational Activities
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Nav-cast Webinars 
        -              Customer Service                      - Regional Navigation                Managers
          - Navigation Response Teams 
          - Citizen Science
          - Ask a Question / Report an Error
          - Staff Directory 
        -              About                      - About Coast Survey
          - Survey Vessels
          - Employment & Internships 
          - Business & Partnerships
          - Coast Survey Blog
          - Contact 

**Chart 12364 is a multi-page chart.**

**Select Cover or Side A or Side B.**

**The Nation's Chartmaker**

About Us | IOCM | HSRP | Contact

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer            | Information Quality             | Freedom of Information Act | USA.gov              | Ready.gov | EEO |            Take our Survey

Website owned by: Office of Coast SurveyNational Ocean Service | NOAA | Department of Commerce

Connect with Coast Survey

**********
#### John Mackey and others, *Appellants, v.*Lucretia M. Vanderhoff and others, *Respondents.*

— Decree of surrogate refusing probate reversed, and issues ordered to be tried by a jury in Queens county, whether will was duly executed or obtained by fraud or undue influence. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
#### § 1242.33 Other expenses and casualties and insurance (accounts XX-17-99, XX-18-99, XX-19-99, 50-17-00, 50-18-00, and 50-19-00).

Separate common expenses on the basis of the percentages calculated for the separation of administrative—other (account XX-19-06).
#### § 1331.4 New parties to an agreement.

Where a carrier becomes a party to an agreement which has been approved by the Board, such approval will extend to such carrier upon the filing with the Board by the carrier or its authorized agent of a verified statement that it has become a party to the agreement, which statement shall show the information prescribed at § 1331.1(b). Such carrier may provide transportation under joint rates or over through routes, but may not otherwise act with carriers of a different class (as defined at 49. U.S.C. 10706(d)).