alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012098EN.01001801.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/18

---

Action brought on 30 January 2012 — European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union

(Case C-43/12)

2012/C 98/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: T. van Rijn and R. Troosters, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul Directive 2011/82/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Directive 2011/82/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences; (1)

1

| — | declare that the effects of Directive 2011/82/EU are to be regarded as definitive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the effects of Directive 2011/82/EU are to be regarded as definitive;

| — | order the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

This application seeks to bring an action for annulment against Directive 2011/82/EU. The Commission disputes the legal basis chosen. It claims that Article 87(2) TFEU is not the appropriate legal basis, as the directive seeks to introduce a mechanism for the exchange of information between Member States that covers road traffic offences, regardless of their administrative or criminal nature. Article 87 refers only to police cooperation between the competent authorities in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences. In the opinion of the Commission, the proper legal basis is Article 91(1) TFEU. The purpose of the directive is to improve road safety, which is one of the common transport policy areas expressly provided for in Article 91(1)(c).

criminal offences

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 288, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1642 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1642

 To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) 
          to the products of Cambodia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 1995

 Mr. Crane (for himself and Mr. Rangel) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) 
          to the products of Cambodia, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) Cambodia is now under democratic rule after 20 years of 
        undemocratic regimes and civil war, and is striving to rebuild 
        its market economy;
            (2) extension of unconditional most-favored-nation 
        treatment would assist Cambodia in developing its economy based 
        on free market principles and becoming competitive in the 
        global marketplace;
            (3) establishing normal commercial relations on a 
        reciprocal basis with Cambodia will promote United States 
        exports to the rapidly growing Southeast Asian region and 
        expand opportunities for United States business and investment 
        in the Cambodian economy; and
            (4) expanding bilateral trade relations that includes a 
        commercial agreement will promote further progress by Cambodia 
        on human rights and toward adoption of regional and world 
        trading rules and principles.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT TO THE PRODUCTS OF 
              CAMBODIA.

    (a) Harmonized Tariff Schedule Amendment.--General note 3(b) of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking 
``Kampuchea''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the effective date of a notice published in 
the Federal Register by the United States Trade Representative that a 
trade agreement obligating reciprocal most-favored-nation treatment 
between Cambodia and the United States has entered into force.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    The President shall submit to the Congress, not later than 18 
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report on the 
trade relations between the United States and Cambodia pursuant to the 
trade agreement described in section 2(b).
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 23, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2013 (April 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04021**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 04021\04021_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04021\04021_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 04021\04021_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04021\04021_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04021\04021_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04021\04021_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04021\04021_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04021\Certification Statement Plant ID 04021.pdf Plant certification statement 04021\Supplemental Documents\04021_dry ash handling block C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04021\Supplemental Documents\04021_pond drawing D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04021\Supplemental Documents\04021_Water balance A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Order entered May 7, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00389-CV

IN RE CHARLES ANTHONY ALLEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV99-01573-V

ORDER

The Court has received relator’s April 14, 2014 correspondence in which relator requests 

the Court to direct the Clerk of Court to provide him a copy of his brief, exhibits, and all papers 

filed in relation to his petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for bench warrant. We 

DENY relator’s request.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
§ 175.30 Inspecting shipments. ( a ) No person may accept a hazardous material for transportation aboard an aircraft unless the aircraft operator ensures the hazardous material is: ( 1 ) Authorized, and is within the quantity limitations specified for carriage aboard aircraft according to § 172.101 of this subchapter or as otherwise specifically provided by this subchapter.
( 2 ) Described and certified on a shipping paper prepared in duplicate in accordance with part 172 of this subchapter or as authorized by subpart C of part 171 of this subchapter. See § 175.33 for shipping paper retention requirements;
( 3 ) Marked and labeled in accordance with subparts D and E of part 172 or as authorized by subpart C of part 171 of this subchapter, and placarded (when required) in accordance with subpart F of part 172 of this subchapter; and
( 4 ) Labeled with a “CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY” label (see § 172.448 of this subchapter) if the material as presented is not permitted aboard passenger-carrying aircraft.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may carry a hazardous material in a package or overpack aboard an aircraft unless the package or overpack is inspected by the operator of the aircraft immediately before placing it: ( 1 ) Aboard the aircraft; or
( 2 ) In a unit load device or on a pallet prior to loading aboard the aircraft.
( c ) A hazardous material may be carried aboard an aircraft only if, based on the inspection by the operator, the package or overpack containing the hazardous material: ( 1 ) Has no leakage or other indication that its integrity has been compromised; and
( 2 ) For Class 7 (radioactive) materials, does not have a broken seal, except packages contained in overpacks need not be inspected for seal integrity.
( d ) The requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section do not apply to Dry ice (carbon dioxide, solid).
( e ) An overpack containing packages of hazardous materials may be accepted only if the operator has taken all reasonable steps to establish that: ( 1 ) The proper shipping names, identification numbers, labels and special handling instructions appearing on the inside packages are clearly visible or reproduced on the outside of the overpack, and
( 2 ) The word “OVERPACK” appears on the outside of the overpack when specification packagings are required.
[71 FR 14604, Mar. 22, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 25177, May 3, 2007; 73 FR 57006, Oct. 1, 2008; 76 FR 3383, Jan. 19, 2011; 79 FR 46040, Aug. 6, 2014; 80 FR 1164, Jan. 8, 2015; 83 FR 52899, Oct. 18, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 171
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 171 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 171.3 Hazardous waste. ( a ) No person may offer for transportation or transport a hazardous waste (as defined in § 171.8 of this subchapter) in interstate or intrastate commerce except in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter.
( b ) No person may accept for transportation, transport, or deliver a hazardous waste for which a manifest is required unless that person: ( 1 ) Has marked each motor vehicle used to transport hazardous waste in accordance with § 390.21 of this title even though placards may not be required;
( 2 ) Complies with the requirements for manifests set forth in § 172.205 of this subchapter; and
( 3 ) Delivers, as designated on the manifest by the generator, the entire quantity of the waste received from the generator or a transporter to: ( i ) The designated facility or, if not possible, to the designated alternate facility;
( ii ) The designated subsequent carrier; or
( iii ) A designated place outside the United States. Note:
Federal law specifies penalties up to $250,000 fine for an individual and $500,000 for a company and 5 years imprisonment for the willful discharge of hazardous waste at other than designated facilities. 49 U.S.C. 5124.
( c ) If a discharge of hazardous waste or other hazardous material occurs during transportation, and an official of a State or local government or a Federal agency, acting within the scope of his official responsibilities, determines that immediate removal of the waste is necessary to prevent further consequence, that official may authorize the removal of the waste without the preparation of a manifest. [Note: In such cases, EPA does not require carriers to have EPA identification numbers.]
Note 1:
EPA requires shippers (generators) and carriers (transporters) of hazardous wastes to have identification numbers which must be displayed on hazardous waste manifests. See 40 CFR parts 262 and 263. (Identification number application forms may be obtained from EPA regional offices.)
Note 2:
In 40 CFR part 263, the EPA sets forth requirements for the cleanup of releases of hazardous wastes.
[Amdt. 171-53, 45 FR 34586, May 22, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 171-53, 45 FR 74648, Nov. 10, 1980; Amdt. 171-78, 49 FR 10510, Mar. 20, 1984; Amdt. 171-107, 54 FR 40068, Sept. 29, 1989; Amdt. 171-111, 55 FR 52466, Dec. 21, 1990; 56 FR 66157, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 171-2, 59 FR 49132, Sept. 26, 1994; Amdt. 171-141, 61 FR 21102, May 9, 1996; 73 FR 57004, Oct. 1, 2008]
#### § 10.85 Wrongfully obtaining records.

Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from the Department under false pretenses is guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 15, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Rooney, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Daniel RooneyDaniel
      RooneyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer ofSCI
      Engineered Materials, Inc.February
      26, 2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending February 4, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST PACTRUST BANCORP, INC. | * 4c8* 3A1    | First PacTrust Bancorp, Inc., Chula Vista, California, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Beach Business Bank, Manhattan Beach, California, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, and 2)to retain 100 percent control of Pacific Trust Bank, fsb,Chula Vista, California, and thereby engage in operating a nonbank thrift subsidiary, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/21/2012
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 02/21/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 95.05-1 Fire detection, manual alarm, and supervised patrol systems. ( a ) Fire detection, manual alarm, and supervised patrol systems are not required except in special cases; but if installed, the systems must meet the applicable requirements of 46 CFR, part 76 of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter.
( b ) In each compartment containing explosives, and in adjacent cargo compartments, there must be provided a smoke detection system. When used, sample extraction smoke detection systems must meet the requirements in § 95.05-3.
( c ) Enclosed spaces that are “specially suitable for vehicles” must be fitted with a fire detection and alarm system.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48263, July 22, 2016]
§ 178.33b-2 Type and size. ( a ) Single-trip inside containers.
( b ) The maximum capacity of containers in this class shall not exceed one liter (61.0 cubic inches). The maximum inside diameter shall not exceed 3 inches.
[74 FR 2268, Jan. 14, 2009]
§ 176.77 Stowage of barges containing hazardous materials on board barge-carrying vessels. ( a ) A barge which contains hazardous materials may be transported on board a barge-carrying vessel if it is stowed in accordance with the requirements of this section.
( b ) A barge which contains hazardous materials for which only “on deck” stowage is authorized must be stowed above the weather deck and be vented to the atmosphere.
( c ) A barge which contains hazardous materials for which both “on deck” and “below deck” stowage is authorized may be stowed above or below the weather deck.
[Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52689, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 76 FR 56317, Sept. 13, 2011]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-301 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 

Regional Environmental Center 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KAZAKHSTAN 

Signed at Almaty March 1, 2002 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KAZAKHSTAN 

Environmental Cooperation: 

Regional Environmental 

Center 

Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Almaty March 1, 2002; 

 Entered into force March 1, 2002.
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.120 Reciprocity. ( a ) The Commandant may delegate authority to a classification society that has its headquarters in a country other than the United States only to the extent that the flag state administration of that country delegates authority and provides access to the American Bureau of Shipping to inspect, certify and provide related services to vessels flagged by that country. The Commandant will determine reciprocity on a “case-by-case” basis.
( b ) In order to demonstrate that the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section are satisfied, a classification society must provide to the Coast Guard an affidavit, from the government of the country that the classification society is headquartered in, listing the authorities delegated by the flag state administration of that country to the American Bureau of Shipping, and indicating any conditions related to the delegated authority.
( c ) The Commandant will not consider an application for authorization to perform a delegated function submitted under this part until the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section are satisfied. Where simultaneous authorization by a foreign government for ABS is involved, this requirement may be waived.
( d ) The Commandant will not evaluate a classification society for recognition until the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section are satisfied for at least one of the authorized delegations being sought. Where simultaneous recognition by a foreign government for ABS is involved, this requirement may be waived.
( e ) The Commandant may make a delegation regarding load lines under 46 U.S.C. 5107 or measurement of vessels under 46 U.S.C. 14103 without regard to the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section.