alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.0
MOTO PHOTO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
                                   Three        Three         Six          Six 
                                  Months       Months        Months       Months
                                   Ended        Ended        Ended        Ended
                                30-June-98   30-June-97    30-June-98   30-June-97

<S>                            <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Numerator:
Net income                      $  575,882  $   697,084    $  770,093   $1,098,705
Preferred stock dividend
requirement                        (68,381)     (70,454)     (206,709)    (212,888)

Numerator for basic earnings
per share--income available 
to common shareholders             507,501      626,630       563,384      885,817

Effect of dilutive securities:

Numerator for diluted earnings
per share--income available to
common stockholders after 
assumed conversions             $  507,501   $  626,630    $  563,384   $  885,817



Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings
per share--weighted average
shares outstanding               7,817,075    7,795,514     7,810,399    7,791,772

Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options
Dilutive potential common 
   shares                           44,687       75,708       140,499       66,592
Denominator for diluted 
earnings per share--adjusted 
weighted average shares and 
assumed conversions              7,861,762    7,871,222     7,950,898    7,858,364


Basic earnings per share             $0.06        $0.08         $0.07        $0.11





</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-514 

________________________________________________________________________ 

BOUNDARY WATERS 

 

 Minute No. 316 of the 

International Boundary and 

Water Commission, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Yuma April 16, 2010 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Boundary Waters 

 Minute No. 316 of the International Boundary and 

 Water Commission, United States and Mexico. 

 Signed at Yuma April 16, 2010; 

 Entered into force May 14, 2010.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Gary Ambrus" <gambrus@wyan.org>

Date: 8/16/2010 8:44 AM

Subject: RE: Extension for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Attachments: pic06766.gif

Hi Gary,

Thanks for following up your request. EPA has reviewed your extension

request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the

Wyandotte Municipal Service - Power Plant. The deadline for your plant

to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to

October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the

steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline

via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic06766.gif)

 

 From: "Gary Ambrus" <gambrus@wyan.org> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "'Kerry McLenon'" <kmclenon@wyan.org> 

 Date: 08/13/2010 02:57 PM 

 Subject: RE: Extention for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Ms. Alicia;

As of today have not received a response to my extension request.

Also, left you a voice mail on your phone this afternoon concerning

this.

Please advise

Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT

Environmental Coordinator

Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant

2555 Van Alstyne

Wyandotte, Michigan 48192

(734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178
gambrus@wyan.org

From: Gary Ambrus [mailto:gambrus@wyan.org]

Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:40 PM

To: 'Alicea.jezebele@epa.com'

Cc: 'Kerry McLenon'

Subject: RE: Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Guidelines

Ms. Alicea;

On behalf of Wyandotte Municipal Services-Power Plant (ID # 03236), I

would like to request an extension of the report deadline

of at least 30 days or longer if possible. The report package was

received today. Our due date would be September 20th under the 90 day

request

We are a small municipal power plant with limited staff.

Every effort to submit the report within 90 days will be undertaken in

either case.

Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT

Environmental Coordinator

Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant

2555 Van Alstyne

Wyandotte, Michigan 48192

(734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178

gambrus@wyan.org
#### § 1503.637 Standard of proof.

The ALJ may issue an initial decision or may rule in a party's favor only if the decision or ruling is supported by a preponderance of the evidence contained in the record. In order to prevail, the party with the burden of proof must prove the party's case or defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
§ 1310.2 Requirement to maintain tariffs. ( a ) Except when providing transportation for charitable purposes without charge, carriers subject to the Board's jurisdiction under Chapter 135 of Title 49 of the United States Code may provide transportation or service for movements of household goods only if the rates, and related rules and practices, for such transportation or service are contained in a published tariff that is in effect under this section. The carrier may not charge or receive a different compensation for the transportation or service than the rate specified in the tariff, whether by returning a part of that rate to a person, by giving a person a privilege, by allowing the use of a facility that affects the value of that transportation or service, or through another device. Tariffs shall be published in the English language and rates shall be stated in money of the United States.
( b ) Tariffs maintained pursuant to this part must be available for inspection by the Board, and must be provided to the Board promptly and free of charge, upon request, by mail or other delivery service.
( c ) A carrier that maintains a tariff pursuant to this part may not enforce the provisions of the tariff unless the carrier has given notice that the tariff is available for inspection in its bill of lading or by other actual notice to individuals whose shipments are subject to the tariff, as provided in § 1310.4 of this part.
( d ) The Board may invalidate a tariff prepared by or on behalf of a carrier under this part if that tariff violates 49 U.S.C. 13702 or the regulations contained in this part.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending February 25, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST PACTRUST BANCORP, INC. | * 4c8* 3A1    | First PacTrust Bancorp, Inc., Chula Vista, California, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Beach Business Bank, Manhattan Beach, California, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, and 2)to retain 100 percent control of Pacific Trust Bank, fsb,Chula Vista, California, and thereby engage in operating a nonbank thrift subsidiary, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/21/2012
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 02/21/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2012 (April 1, 2012 - June 30, 2012)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1110.9 Petition for waiver.

Any person may petition the Board for a permanent or temporary waiver of any rule. Petitions should be filed with the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of Proceedings, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC 20423-0001, and should identify the rule involved.

[74 FR 52907, Oct. 15, 2009]
#### Orville Wormuth and another, *Administrators, etc., Respondents, v.*David Sonburger, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### State *v.*Downs.

An indictment, charging out-building adjoining that the building was house. that the respondent attempted to set fire to an a dwelling-house, is not supported by evidence near to but not in contact with the dwelling-

Indictment, charging that the respondent attempted to set fire to an out-building adjoining a dwelling-house. The evidence was, that the out-building did not touch the house; that the space between them at the base was four inches; that the house was higher than the out-building, and the roof of the house extended over it, leaving a space of about three feet between its top and the under side of the roof of the house. The respondent’s objection that *321there was a variance was *proforma*overruled. Verdict guilty, and motion in arrest of judgment.

*Cogswell*and Slone, for the respondent.

*Rogers,*solicitor, for the state.

Stanley, J.

The motion for the discharge of the respondent ■should have been granted. There was a variance between the indictment and the proof. The out-building did not adjoin the dwelling-house. “Adjoining” is a synonym for “adjacent to,” “ contiguous.” it was not adjacent to or contiguous, that is, in contact with the house. *Arkell*v. *Ins. Co.,*69 N. Y. 192; *Rex*v. *Hodges,*1 Moo. *&*M. 341; *Peverelly*v. *People,*3 Park. 59; 2 Russ. Cr. 557-561.

The statute upon which this indictment was found specifies three distinct offences, although the punishment is the same in all of them. They are, — first, burning a dwelling-house; second, burning any out-building adjoining a dwelling-house; third, burning any building whereby a dwelling-house shall be burned. The words an out-building adjoining a dwelling-house are words of description, and must be proved. A conviction under this indictment, upon the evidence received, would be no bar to an indictment for attempting to set fire to an out-building whereby a dwelling-house might be burned, and the evidence received in this case would support such a charge.

*Judgment arrested.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.12 Committee Resignation--Minority]
[Page 891]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.12  committee resignation--minority

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WICKER, laid before the House the 
following communication, which was read as follows:

                                    Congress of the United States,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                                    June 13, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: I hereby submit my resignation from the 
     Committee on Small Business effective June 13, 1995.
           Warm regards,
                                                   Karen McCarthy,
                                               Member of Congress.

  By unanimous consent, the resignation was accepted.
```
§ 17.8 How does the Secretary provide states an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development? ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Secretary gives state processes or state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities at least: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) 60 days from the date established by the Secretary to comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial assistance.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Department have been delegated.
( c ) Applicants for programs and activities subject to section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Act shall allow areawide agencies a 60-day opportunity for review and comment.
§ 52.01-135 Inspection and tests (modifies PG-90 through PG-100). ( a ) *Requirements.* Inspection and test of boilers and boiler pressure parts must be as indicated in PG-90 through PG-100 of Section I of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 52.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) *Inspection personnel.* The inspections required by PG-90 through PG-100 of Section I of the ASME BPVC must be performed by the “Authorized Inspector” as defined in PG-91 of Section I of the ASME BPVC. The Authorized Inspector must hold a valid commission issued by the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. After installation, boilers will be inspected for compliance with this part by the “Marine Inspector” as defined in § 50.10-15 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Hydrostatic test.* (Modifies PG-99.) Each new boiler must be hydrostatically tested after installation to 1.5 times the maximum allowable working pressure as indicated in PG-99 of Section I of the ASME BPVC. Before the boilers are insulated, accessible parts of the boiler must be emptied, opened, and all interior surfaces must be examined by the marine inspector to ascertain that no defects have occurred due to the hydrostatic test.
( d ) *Operating tests.* In addition to hydrostatic tests prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section, automatically controlled propulsion and auxiliary boilers must be subjected to operating tests as specified in §§ 61.30-20, 61.35-1, 61.35-3, 62.30-10, 63.15-9, 63.25-3, and 63.25-5 of this subchapter, as appropriate, or as directed by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, for propulsion boilers. These tests are to be performed after final installation.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18815, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9976, June 17, 1970; CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9433, Mar. 8, 1985; CGD 88-057, 55 FR 24236, June 15, 1990; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65162, Oct. 31, 2008]
§ 1503.425 Compromise orders. ( a ) *Issuance.* At any time before the issuance of an Order Assessing Civil Penalty under this subpart, an agency attorney and a person subject to a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, or an agency official and a person subject to a Notice of Violation, may agree to dispose of the case by the issuance of a compromise order by TSA.
( b ) *Contents.* A compromise order contains the following: ( 1 ) All jurisdictional facts.
( 2 ) All allegations.
( 3 ) A statement that the person agrees to pay the civil penalty specified.
( 4 ) A statement that TSA makes no finding of a violation.
( 5 ) A statement that the compromise order will not be used as evidence of a prior violation in any subsequent civil penalty proceeding.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 6, 2010

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|CUSTOMERS BANK B*B                    | * Branch       | New Century Bank, d/b/a Customers Bank, Phoenixville, PA to establish a branch office located at 2419 Nottingham Way, Hamilton, NJ. | Newspaper:11/03/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | 11/03/2010    
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable
|WARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P. | CIC            | Warburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P., New York, NY, to acquire up to 19.7% of National Penn Bancshares, Inc, Boyertown, PA.        | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/09/2010 
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | 11/09/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|LAFAYETTE AMBASSADOR BK, EASTON, PENNSYLVANIA | 140018 | 05/03/2010 | 10/29/2010     | O         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 3, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-1428.

#### State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown.

In Mandamus. On relator’s bill and documentation in support of attorney fees and costs. Relator is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,352.50 and a refund of costs of $140.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 15, 2007, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning Consortium, 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Agilix, 
Orem, UT; Florida Virtual Schools, Orlando, FL; Houghton Mifflin 
Company, Boston, MA; Sungard Higher Education, Malvern, PA; and Sun 
Microsystems, Inc., Broomfield, CO have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 
55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 16, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 7, 2007 (72 FR 25781).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-3592 Filed 7-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M