alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0314(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0314(02)

**Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures **

*
Official Journal C 065 , 14/03/2002 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2002/C 65/05)

1. The Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below, as provided in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995(1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2. Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the removal of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3. Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), TERV 0/13, B-1049 Brussels(2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4. This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995.

>TABLE>

(1) OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2238/2000 (OJ L 257, 11.10.2000, p. 2).

(2) Telex: COMEU B 21877, fax (32-2) 295 65 05.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 23, 1995 (71), Para 71.17 Memorials]
[Page 808]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.71.17  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       88. By the SPEAKER: A memorial of the Senate of the 
     Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, relative to Fort Indiantown 
     Gap, PA; to the Committee on National Security.
       89. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Hawaii, 
     relative to requesting Hawaii's congressional delegation to 
     support the continuation of community action in the State of 
     Hawaii; to the Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities.
       90. Also, memorial of the General Assembly of the State of 
     Indiana, relative to the Republic of China (Taiwan's) 
     participation in the United Nations; to the Committee on 
     International Relations.
       91. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to the Endangered Species Act of 1973; to the 
     Committee on Resources.
       92. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to urging the U.S. Congress to maintain the U.S. 
     Geological Survey; to the Committee on Resources.
       93. Also memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to the 10th amendment to the Constitution of the 
     United States; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       94. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to urging the U.S. Congress to pass legislation 
     prohibiting each State from imposing a tax on the income from 
     a pension of a person who is not a resident of that State; to 
     the Committee on the Judiciary.
       95. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Nevada, 
     relative to proposing to amend the ordinance of the Nevada 
     constitution to repeal the disclaimer of interest of the 
     State in unappropriated public lands; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
       96. Also memorial of the Senate of the State of Iowa, 
     relative to border city trucking agreements; to the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       97. Also memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Texas, relative to the Water Pollution Control Act; 
     to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       98. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Texas, relative to NASA's proposed reorganization 
     plan; to the Committee on Science.
       99. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Hawaii, 
     relative to requesting a study of the welfare system of the 
     State of Hawaii; to the Committee on Ways and Means.
       100. Also, memorial of the Senate of Hawaii, relative to 
     urging the U.S. Congress to support legislation to safeguard 
     veterans' disability compensation and Social Security 
     disability compensation from elimination, reduction, or 
     taxation; jointly, to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs and 
     Ways and Means.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from UNITED
INVESTORS  INCOME  PROPERTIES 1999 Fourth Quarter 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000830056
<NAME>                                UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        1,167
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   154
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                       10,835
<DEPRECIATION>                               (3,351)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                9,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    9,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  9,252
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,814
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (8.76)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 1540.107 Submission to screening and inspection. ( a ) No individual may enter a sterile area or board an aircraft without submitting to the screening and inspection of his or her person and accessible property in accordance with the procedures being applied to control access to that area or aircraft under this subchapter.
( b ) An individual must provide his or her full name, as defined in § 1560.3 of this chapter, date of birth, and gender when— ( 1 ) The individual, or a person on the individual's behalf, makes a reservation for a covered flight, as defined in § 1560.3 of this chapter, or
( 2 ) The individual makes a request for authorization to enter a sterile area.
( c ) An individual may not enter a sterile area or board an aircraft if the individual does not present a verifying identity document as defined in § 1560.3 of this chapter, when requested for purposes of watch list matching under § 1560.105(c), unless otherwise authorized by TSA on a case-by-case basis.
( d ) The screening and inspection described in paragraph (a) of this section may include the use of advanced imaging technology. Advanced imaging technology used for the screening of passengers under this section must be equipped with and employ automatic target recognition software and any other requirement TSA deems necessary to address privacy considerations. ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, advanced imaging technology- ( i ) Means a device used in the screening of passengers that creates a visual image of an individual showing the surface of the skin and revealing other objects on the body; and
( ii ) May include devices using backscatter x-rays or millimeter waves and devices referred to as whole body imaging technology or body scanning machines.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, automatic target recognition software means software installed on an advanced imaging technology device that produces a generic image of the individual being screened that is the same as the images produced for all other screened individuals.
[73 FR 64061, Oct. 28, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 11405, Mar. 3, 2016]
§ 172.442 CORROSIVE label. ( a ) Except for size and color, the CORROSIVE label must be as follows:
( b ) In addition to complying with § 172.407, the background on the CORROSIVE label must be white in the top half and black in the lower half.
[Amdt. 172-123, 56 FR 66259, Dec. 20, 1991]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.39 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1062]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.39  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the foregoing amendment, as amended, submitted by Mr. 
BURTON, as amended by the foregoing substitute amendment submitted by 
Mr. VOLKMER, agreed to earlier:

It was decided in the

Yeas

191

negative

Nays

210
```
#### John Shields and others, *Appellants, v.*Anna A. Ingram, *Respon*dent.

Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,306,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      42,121,017
<DEPRECIATION>                            (23,872,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,112,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     23,119,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,112,871
<SALES>                                      6,756,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,831,721
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,145,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,599,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,168
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1544.207 Screening of individuals and property. ( a ) *Applicability of this section.* This section applies to the inspection of individuals, accessible property, checked baggage, and cargo as required under this part.
( b ) *Locations within the United States at which TSA conducts screening.* Each aircraft operator must ensure that the individuals or property have been inspected by TSA before boarding or loading on its aircraft. This paragraph applies when TSA is conducting screening using TSA employees or when using companies under contract with TSA.
( c ) *Aircraft operator conducting screening.* Each aircraft operator must use the measures in its security program and in subpart E of this part to inspect the individual or property. This paragraph does not apply at locations identified in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section.
( d ) *Locations outside the United States at which the foreign government conducts screening.* Each aircraft operator must ensure that all individuals and property have been inspected by the foreign government. This paragraph applies when the host government is conducting screening using government employees or when using companies under contract with the government.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 25, 2010

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF SALEM     | Member         | Bank of Salem, Salem, Arkansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                   | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF BARTLETT, BARTLETT, TENNESSEE    | 225559 | 06/15/2009 | 09/10/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|SIMMONS FIRST BK, RUSSELLVILLE, ARKANSAS | 459046 | 06/07/2010 | 09/20/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 172.536 [Reserved]
#### William H. Silvernail, *Appellant, v.*Eve Malvina Felts, Respondent.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### William Howard DUNN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13522.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 12, 1958.

Certiorari Denied Oct. 13, 1958.

See 79 S.Ct. 75.

See also 250 F.2d 548.

Robert Crawford, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Millsaps Fitzhugh, U. S. Atty., Edward N. Vaden, Asst. U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before McALLISTER, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to invalidate sentence, which the district court treated as a motion filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. A. Section 2255. This matter was previously before this court, and was remanded for further proceedings for the reason that the government had failed to deny an allegation that it had used perjured testimony knowingly in securing appellant’s conviction. Dunn v. United States, 6 Cir., 245 F.2d 407. Other contentions now made here have been determined adversely to appellant. On numerous occasions, appellant has been before this court in proceedings that wholly lacked merit, and which indicate an abuse of judicial process on his part. See Dunn v. United States, 6 Cir., 234 F.2d 219.

Upon remand of the case for determination of the claim of the use of perjured testimony against appellant, the government filed responsive pleadings supported by numerous affidavits. The indefinite nature of the claim of the so-called perjured testimony and the lack of factual allegations as to how a certain witness was persuaded to testify falsely do not add up to use by the government, knowingly, of perjured testimony to secure appellant’s conviction.

The order of the district court dismissing appellant’s motion to vacate sentence was not inconsistent with our directions upon remand, and is, accordingly, affirmed.
### BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------- ----

:

U.S.

- JAPAN ALLIANCE CASE : DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 005 9

:

-------------------------------- ---

VERIFICA TION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

Kenji C. Hashim oto, as th e authorized representative of

American Airlines, Inc., states as follows:

1. I am Vice President, Strategic Alliances for American

Airlines.

2

. I hereby verify that the Joint Business Agreement

between American Airlines, Inc. and Japan Ai rlines Co., Ltd.,

which the D epartment approved with antitrust immunity by Order

2010

- 11

- 10, November 10, 2010, was implemented on April 1, 2011.

3. I understand that under 18 USC 1001, an individual who

knowingly and willfully makes any materially f alse, fictitious,

or fraudulent statement or representation in a matter within the

jurisdiction of the United States Government is subject to

criminal penalties.

______________________________ Kenji C. Hashimoto

Vice President

– Strategic Alliances

American Airlines, Inc.

4333 Amon Carter Blvd., MD 5634

Ft. Worth, Texas 76155

(817) 967

- 6520

kenji.hashimoto@aa.com

April 27, 2012**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email

on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com

scott.mcclain@delta.com steve.morrissey@united.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

r bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh

- airlaw.com

esahr@eckertseamons.com rpommer@atlasair.com

russell.bailey@alpa.org eskraft@jamhoff.com

j onathan.linde@united.co m dpdean@jamhoff.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com

robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com

msinick@ssd.com willim.stallings @usdoj.gov

cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com urskr@state.gov

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hoganlovells .com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com

lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net

mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com

howard.kass@usairways.com jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com

dan.weiss@united .com nssparks@fedex.com

cefelts@fedex.com

________________________________ CARL B. NELSON

April 27

, 2012
Court of Appeals No. 

Trial Court Cause No. 15-05-0240-CVW

In the 81st/218th Judicial District Court

Of Wilson County, Texas

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

Elgin Tracy, Adolph Tracy & Travis Morgan, Appellants

Vs

Edward W. Chamrad, Jr., Appellee

Appealed to the 4th Court of Appeals at San Antonio, Texas

 Attorneys for Appellants: Attorney for Appellee

 R. Adam Swick Ryan C. Reed 

 SBOT: 24051794 SBOT: 24065957

1301 S. Capital of Texas Highway 2161 NW Military Highway

 Building C, Suite 300 Suite 400

 Austin, TX 78746 San Antonio, TX 78213

Trent C. Rowell

SBOT: 50511930

P.O. Box 457

Stockdale, TX 78160

Electronically filed with the Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas on the ___ day of 

August, 2015.

Signature of Clerk/Deputy______________________________________

Deborah Bryan, District Clerk

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/4/2015 3:00:18 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending January 4, 2014

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|HOMETOWN BANK             | * Branch       | Hometown Bank, Roanoke, Virginia, to establish a branch at 852 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia.                                                                      | Newspaper:12/27/2013Federal Register:Not applicable  
|Newspaper:                | 12/27/2013    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|REGIONAL BANKSHARES, INC. | CIC            | Mr. Randolph Gillespie Rogers, Hartsville, South Carolina, to acquire up to 10.97% of the outstanding shares of Regional Bankshares, Inc., Hartsville, South Carolina. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 176.48 Situation requiring report. ( a ) When a fire or other hazardous condition exists on a vessel transporting hazardous materials, the master shall notify the nearest Captain of the Port as soon as possible and shall comply with any instructions given by the Captain of the Port.
( b ) When an incident occurs during transportation in which a hazardous material is involved, a report may be required (see §§ 171.15 and 171.16 of this subchapter).
( c ) If a package, portable tank, freight container, highway or railroad vehicle containing hazardous materials is jettisoned or lost, the master shall notify the nearest Captain of the Port as soon as possible of the location, quantity, and type of the material.
[Amdt. 176-1, 41 FR 16110, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 176-1A, 41 FR 40687, Sept. 20, 1976; Amdt. 176-1B, 41 FR 57072, Dec. 30, 1976; Amdt. 176-24, 51 FR 5974, Feb. 18, 1986; Amdt. 176-25, 52 FR 8592, Mar. 19, 1987]