alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending September 14, 2013

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|TFB BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | TFB Bancorp, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The Foothills Bank, both of Yuma, Arizona. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6844** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. FRANESIOUR B. KEMACHE

- WEBSTER, a/k/a Bryan Webster , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8:10

- cr - 00654

- RWT

- 1 ; 8:14

- cv - 02005

- RWT )

Submitted : September 9 , 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Franesiour B. Ke m ache

- Webster, Appellant Pro Se. Kristi Noel O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bi nding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Franesiour B. Ke m ache

- Webster seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the meri ts, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional r ight. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Kem ache

- Webster has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before th is court and argume nt would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 22, 2011

----

Board Operations            Offices of Diversity and Inclusion -- establishment of offices to promote diversity and inclusion at the Board and at the twelve Federal Reserve Banks, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Announced, January 18, 2011            Personnel            Division of Research and Statistics -- appointment of Michael Gibson, Janice Shack-Marquez, and Daniel Sichel as senior associate directors; Daniel Covitz, Matthew Eichner, Eric Engen, Michael Kiley, David Lebow, and Michael Palumbo as associate directors; Sean Campbell and Joshua Gallin as deputy associate directors; and Elizabeth Kiser, Karen Pence, John Roberts, Steven Sharpe, John Stevens, and Stacey Tevlin as assistant directors.            -Announced, January 21, 2011                        Management Division -- appointment of Brender L. Gregory as associate director.            -Announced, January 21, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Government Accountability Office -- response to the GAO report "Mortgage Foreclosures:  Additional Mortgage Servicers Actions Could Help Reduce the Frequency and Impact of Abandoned Foreclosures."            -Approved, January 21, 2011                        Office of Thrift Supervision Transition Plan -- interagency report to Congress regarding the transfer of OTS authority and responsibilities to the Board, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, January 11, 2011            (A/C)          Enforcement            Intervest Bancshares Corporation, New York, New York -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.            -Announced, January 20, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Filed 2/15/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 27

Lucas Lee Strutz, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota,Respondent and Appellee

No. 20000268

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Monty G. Mertz (submitted on brief), Mertz Law Office, 1308 23rd Street S., P.O. Box 10396, Fargo, N.D. 58106-0396, for petitioner and appellant.

Mark R. Boening (submitted on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.

State v. Strutz

No. 20000268

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Lucas Lee Strutz appeals from a judgment denying his application for post- conviction relief.  Under Rule 52(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., a trial court’s findings of fact in a post-conviction relief proceeding will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.  Hill v. State, 2000 ND 143, ¶ 17, 615 N.W.2d 135.  We summarily affirm the trial court’s judgment under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Roger Kienzle

Case No. 98-2510

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule II, Section 5(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio and Section 2701.11 of the Ohio Revised Code, effective December 1, 1998, the Supreme Court appoints the following judges to serve on the five-judge commission to consider the report of the hearing panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in *In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Roger Kienzle,*Case No. 98-2510:

Judge Jon R. Spahr Licking County Court of Common Pleas (Fifth District)

Judge John T. Patton Eighth District Court of Appeals

*1441Dated: December 1,1998

Judge Barbara P. Gorman Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas (Second District)

Judge John D. Schmitt Shelby County Court of Common Pleas (Third District)

Judge Jan Michael Long Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas (Fourth District)

Pursuant to Gov.Jud.R. Ill, Section 2(B)(1), the Supreme Court designates Judge Spahr as Chairman of the Commission.

Pursuant to R.C. 2701.11, Richard A. Dove, Associate Director of the Supreme Court of Ohio, for the purpose of this proceeding, is designated as Administrative Director to serve as Secretary to the Commission, with authority to sign entriés and orders on behalf of and at the direction of the Commission or its chairman.

All pleadings and documents in this matter shall be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court. The original and seven copies of all documents shall be filed. Service on the Commission shall be made by serving the Secretary. The Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio shall apply to all proceedings before the Commission, except as otherwise ordered by the Court.

THOMAS J. MOYER Chief Justice
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
  /s/ Patrick J. Moty
    
    /s/ Samuel D. JimenezPatrick J. Moty
    
    Samuel D. JimenezPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
97-2182.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz.

On May 20,1998, this court indefinitely suspended respondent, Phillip Kurtz, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2). On September 30, 1998, relator, Disciplinary Counsel filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order requiring respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s May 20, 1998 order. Respondent did not respond to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the motion be, and hereby is, granted. It is further ordered that respondent appear in person before this court on Tuesday, December 15,1998, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

Douglas, X, would issue a show cause order only.
ATTACHMENT A – Glenn County Permit to Op erate June 21, 2007 – JM Willows, CA Facility
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            5369
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            6789
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 20200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      25947
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            7493
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              7531
<LOANS>                                          66259
<ALLOWANCE>                                        740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  139864
<DEPOSITS>                                      100418
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1671
<LONG-TERM>                                      22739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4737
<OTHER-SE>                                       10299
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  139864
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   4759
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2039
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   531
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  7329
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3282
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             4047
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      136
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  91
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1322
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                         47
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    252
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   578
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       14
<RECOVERIES>                                        40
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  740
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               252
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            488
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          52,821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,877
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,500
<PP&E>                                         152,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,717,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,898
<BONDS>                                        743,340
<COMMON>                                           312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     527,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,717,221
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,176
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   918
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,988
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,966)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
§ 1542.101 General requirements. ( a ) No person may operate an airport subject to § 1542.103 unless it adopts and carries out a security program that— ( 1 ) Provides for the safety and security of persons and property on an aircraft operating in air transportation or intrastate air transportation against an act of criminal violence, aircraft piracy, and the introduction of an unauthorized weapon, explosive, or incendiary onto an aircraft;
( 2 ) Is in writing and is signed by the airport operator;
( 3 ) Includes the applicable items listed in § 1542.103;
( 4 ) Includes an index organized in the same subject area sequence as § 1542.103; and
( 5 ) Has been approved by TSA.
( b ) Each airport operator subject to § 1542.103 must maintain one current and complete copy of its security program and provide a copy to TSA upon request.
( c ) Each airport operator subject to § 1542.103 must— ( 1 ) Restrict the distribution, disclosure, and availability of sensitive security information (SSI), as defined in part 1520 of this chapter, to persons with a need to know; and
( 2 ) Refer all requests for SSI by other persons to TSA.
[67 FR 8355, Feb. 22, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 30509, May 26, 2006]
#### The State ex rel. Gonzales, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee, et al.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Gonzales v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 222.]

(No. 97-1097

Submitted October 27, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A.,*and *William R. Menacher,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*223The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 

MATTEL, INC. 2010 EQUITY AND LONG-TERM COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) maintains the Mattel, Inc. 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan, effective as of May 12, 2010 (the “Plan”);

 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 23(a) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of Mattel (the “Board”)
may at any time amend the Plan, provided, that no amendment of the Plan may affect an outstanding grant under the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to cause awards granted under the Plan with a performance period or, in the case of
long-term incentive equity awards, a performance cycle commencing on or after August 29, 2013 to be subject to the Mattel, Inc. Compensation Recovery Policy. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 23(a) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of August 29, 2013, as follows: 

1. A new Section 19A is hereby added as follows: 
 “19A. Compensation Recovery Policy. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, Grants under this Plan shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Mattel, Inc.
Compensation Recovery Policy, as may be amended from time to time, to the extent applicable. This Section 19A shall apply only to Grants made on or after August 29, 2013 or Grants with a performance period or, in the case of long-term
incentive equity awards, a performance cycle that commences on or after August 29, 2013.” 
 2. Ratification and
Confirmation. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and remains in full force and effect. 
 3. Governing Law. This Amendment No. 1 shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. 

4. Headings. Section headings are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of this Amendment No. 1. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mattel has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed, effective as of August 29, 2013. 

 

			
	MATTEL, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan Kaye
	Name:	 	Alan Kaye
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
		
	Dated:	 	September 3, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1931 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1931

 To amend the Legal Services Corporation Act to prohibit recipients of 
grants or contracts from the Legal Services Corporation from soliciting 
                    clients, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 1995

 Mr. Gillmor introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Legal Services Corporation Act to prohibit recipients of 
grants or contracts from the Legal Services Corporation from soliciting 
                    clients, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmer/Attorney Integrity 
Restoration Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. SOLICITATIONS.

    Section 1007(b) of the Legal Services Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 
2996f(b)) is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (9), by 
striking the period at the end of paragraph (10) and inserting ``; or'' 
and by adding at the end the following:
            ``(11) to enter private property for the purpose of 
        soliciting clients, meeting with individuals in addition to the 
        individuals who authorized entry on the private property, or 
        inspecting for possible legal actions which may be brought 
        against the owner of the private property .''.
                                 <all>
```
Have You Seen This Beetle?

The body of this pest is about an inch long, shiny,

and black with bright white spots. Its curved black

antennae with white rings are even longer than

its body.

Check wooden crates and pallets for exit or entry

holes, larvae, sawdust and other insect waste, and

live beetles.

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 1663

Issued September 1999

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Help the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)

detect the Asian longhorned beetle and other woodboring pests by inspecting solid wood packing

material from China, including Hong Kong, in your

warehouse. For positive identification of insect specimens, contact your local USDA–Animal and Plant

Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and

Quarantine, office or your State’s plant health director.

If you need additional information, call (301)

734–5255 or visit the Asian longhorned beetle

Website at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/oa/alb/alb.html Photo credit: APHIS photographs by Ken Law.
§ 172.500 Applicability of placarding requirements. ( a ) Each person who offers for transportation or transports any hazardous material subject to this subchapter shall comply with the applicable placarding requirements of this subpart.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to— ( 1 ) Infectious substances;
( 2 ) Hazardous materials authorized by this subchapter to be offered for transportation as a limited quantity when identified as such on a shipping paper in accordance with § 172.203(b) or when marked as such in accordance with § 172.315.
( 3 ) Hazardous materials prepared in accordance with § 173.13 of this subchapter;
( 4 ) Hazardous materials which are packaged as small quantities under the provisions of §§ 173.4, 173.4a, 173.4b of this subchapter; and
( 5 ) Combustible liquids in non-bulk packagings.
[Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52599, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 172-149, 61 FR 27173, May 30, 1996; 74 FR 2253, Jan. 14, 2009; 76 FR 3367, Jan. 19, 2011; 87 FR 79773, Dec. 27, 2022]