# EUR-Lex - 52014DC0564 - EN

*|*

# 52014DC0564

**DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N° 5 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014 GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION Section III – Commission /* COM/2014/0564 final - 2014/ () */**

			*

			*

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N° 5
TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014

GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION
Section III – Commission

Having regard to:

– 
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the
Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular
Article 106a thereof,

– 
the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the Financial
Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union[1], and in particular
Article 41 thereof,

– 
the Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No
1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework
for the years 2014-2020[2],
and in particular Article 13 thereof,

– 
the general budget of the European Union for the
financial year 2014 adopted on 20 November 2013[3],

– 
the amending budget No 1/2014[4], adopted on 16 April
2014,

– 
the draft amending budget No 2/2014[5], adopted on 15 April
2014,

– 
the draft amending budget No 3/2014[6], adopted on 28 May 2014,

– 
the draft amending budget No 4/2014[7], adopted on 9 July
2014,

The European
Commission hereby presents to the budgetary authority the draft amending budget
No 5 to the 2014 budget.

CHANGES TO
THE STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE BY SECTION

The changes to
the statement of revenue and expenditure by section are available on EUR-Lex (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm). An
English version of the changes to this statement is attached for information as
a budgetary annex.

TABLE OF
CONTENT

1.       Introduction.. 3

2.       Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity
Fund.. 3

2.1     Italy – Floods in Sardinia.. 3

2.2     Greece – Earthquakes at Kefalonia.. 4

2.3     Slovenia – Ice storm.. 6

2.4     Croatia – Ice and floods. 7

3.       Financing.. 8

4.       Summary table by MFF heading.. 9

1.           Introduction

Draft Amending Budget
(DAB) No 5 for the year 2014 covers the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund
for an amount of EUR 46 998 528 in commitment and payment
appropriations. The mobilisation relates to floods in Italy (Sardinia) during
November 2013, an earthquake in Greece (Kefalonia), ice storms in Slovenia, and
the same ice storms, followed by floods in Croatia,  at end January / beginning
February 2014.

2.           Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity
Fund

Different types of natural
disasters (floods, earthquakes and ice storms) have caused considerable damages
to the applicant EU Member States of Italy, Greece, Slovenia and Croatia. While Italy and Greece were affected by non-related, different types of disasters,
one of the worst winter blizzards in Europe affected several countries, with
particularly damaging effects to Slovenia and Croatia.

While on 28 June 2014 Regulation
(EU) No 661/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 establishing the European Union
Solidarity Fund entered into force[8],
substantive rules cannot be applied retroactively. The Commission has therefore
carried out thorough examinations of the applications in accordance with the original
provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 establishing the European
Union Solidarity Fund and in particular with Articles 2, 3 and 4 thereof.

The most important
elements of the assessments are summarised here below.

2.1         Italy – Floods in Sardinia

(1) 
Sardinia was affected by
extreme rainfall on 18 and 19 November 2013 that caused many rivers to burst
their banks and gave rise to widespread floods.

(2) 
The application from Italy was received on 24
January 2014, within the deadline of 10 weeks after the first damage was
recorded on 18 November 2013.

(3) 
The flooding is of natural origin and therefore
falls within the main field of application of the Solidarity Fund.

(4) 
The Italian authorities estimated total direct
damage at EUR 652 418 691 which is below the major disaster threshold
of EUR 3,8 billion applicable to Italy in 2014 (i.e.
EUR 3 billion in 2002 prices) the disaster does not qualify as a
"major natural disaster" according to the EUSF Regulation.

(5) 
Italy provided a
detailed breakdown of damage whereby the biggest shares relate to damage in the
field of road and transport infrastructure of EUR 156,5 million, to
damage in the field of hydraulic and water networks of EUR 224,6 million
and to public buildings of EUR 40,6 million. The total amount for
private damage amounts to EUR 38,3 million.

(6) 
As total direct damage remains below the major
disaster threshold for activating the Solidarity Fund the application was
examined on the basis of the criteria for "extraordinary regional
disasters” as laid down in Article 2(2), last subparagraph, of Regulation (EC)
No 2012/2002 setting out the conditions for mobilising the Solidarity Fund
“under exceptional circumstances”. Under these criteria, a region can
exceptionally benefit from assistance from the Fund where that region has been
affected by an extraordinary disaster, mainly a natural one, affecting the
major part of its population, with serious and lasting repercussions on living
conditions and the economic stability of the region. The Regulation calls for
special focus on remote and isolated regions such as the insular and outermost
regions defined in Article 349 of the Treaty. Sardinia does not fall within this
category. The Regulation calls for "utmost rigour" in assessing
applications presented under the provisions for "extraordinary regional
disasters".

(7) 
As set out in the Annual Report on the
Solidarity Fund (2002-2003)[9] the Commission considers that, in order for the specific criteria
for regional disasters to be meaningful in the national context, a distinction
needs to be drawn between serious regional events and those that are merely
local. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity the latter are the
responsibility of the national authorities, while the former can be considered
for support under the Solidarity Fund.

(8) 
One of the conditions set out in Regulation (EC)
No 2012/2002 for the exceptional mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund is that
the major part of the population in the region to which the application relates
must be affected. The Italian application states that out of the total
population of 1,288 million inhabitants living in the 310 affected
municipalities, 1,031 million people were directly affected by the disaster. It
can therefore be concluded that the major part of the population was directly
affected by the disaster.

(9) 
As regards the requirement to demonstrate
serious and lasting repercussions on the living conditions and the economic
stability of the region, the application describes that most of Sardinia's territory (except for a minor part to the east of the island) was affected by
the disaster. It highlights the destruction and interruption of important
infrastructures (such as in the fields of transport, water and electricity),
the impact of the floods on the natural environment, the effects on businesses
and tourism and to residential homes. Moreover, a decline in exports in mining
and quarrying and of agricultural goods is expected. Significant damage to dams
in the Nuoro province was reported. Interruption and destruction of the road
and transport network caused many problems to the population, particularly for
those commuting to work. Italy estimates that the repair of the road and supply
network will last up to 2 years and more. Damage to private businesses (often
family-run) was reported, as well as damage to the agricultural sector which
plays an important role in Sardinia.

(10) 
The cost of essential emergency operations
eligible under Article 3(2) of the EUSF Regulation has been estimated by the
Italian authorities at EUR 20,9 million and has been presented by
type of operation. The highest costs are estimated for preventive
infrastructures and immediate protection of cultural heritage.

(11) 
The affected region is eligible as a
"transition region" under the European Structural and Investment
(ESI) Funds (2014-2020). The Italian authorities have not signalled to the
Commission their intention to reallocate funding from the ESI Funds programmes
for Sardinia towards recovery measures.

(12) 
The Italian authorities indicated that there is
no insurance coverage of eligible cost.

2.2         Greece – Earthquakes at Kefalonia

(1) 
Kefalonia was affected by a heavy earthquake with
a magnitude of 5,8 on the Richter scale, followed by dozens of severe
aftershocks,  northeast of the island, between 26 January 2014 and 3 February
2014, leaving 3 000 people homeless and several casualties. A significant
number of houses were severely damaged while people had to be accommodated
several nights in tents or in army ships.

(2) 
The application from Greece was received on 28
March 2014, within the deadline of 10 weeks after the first damage was recorded
on 26 January 2014.

(3) 
The earthquake is of natural origin and
therefore falls within the main field of application of the Solidarity Fund.

(4) 
The Greek authorities estimated total direct
damage at EUR 147 332 790 which is below the major disaster
threshold of EUR 1,2 billion applicable to Greece in 2014 (i.e. 0,6 %
of GNI based on 2012 data) the disaster does not qualify as a "major
natural disaster" according to the EUSF Regulation.

(5) 
As total direct damage remains below the major
disaster threshold for activating the Solidarity Fund the application was
examined on the basis of the criteria for "extraordinary regional
disasters” as laid down in Article 2(2), last subparagraph, of Regulation (EC)
No 2012/2002 setting out the conditions for mobilising the Solidarity Fund
“under exceptional circumstances”. Under these criteria, a region can exceptionally
benefit from assistance from the Fund where that region has been affected by an
extraordinary disaster, mainly a natural one, affecting the major part of its
population, with serious and lasting repercussions on living conditions and the
economic stability of the region. The Regulation calls for special focus on
remote and isolated regions such as the insular and outermost regions defined
in Article 349 of the Treaty. The affected area in Greece does not fall within
this category. The Regulation calls for "utmost rigour" in assessing
applications presented under the provisions for "extraordinary regional
disasters".

(6) 
As set out in the Annual Report on the
Solidarity Fund (2002-2003) the Commission considers that, in order for the
specific criteria for regional disasters to be meaningful in the national
context, a distinction needs to be drawn between serious regional events and
those that are merely local. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity
the latter are the responsibility of the national authorities, while the former
can be considered for support under the Solidarity Fund.

(7) 
One of the conditions set out in Regulation (EC)
No 2012/2002 for the exceptional mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund is that
the major part of the population in the region to which the application relates
must be affected. The Greek application states that the totality of the
population of the Ionian Islands, some 208 000 inhabitants, was affected
by the earthquakes with the most serious effects being felt on the Islands of
Kefalonia and Ithaki for which the state of emergency was declared. The other
parts of the Ionian Islands were affected to a lesser degree. After the first
shock, thousands of people had to spend the nights in army tents or had to be
accommodated on ships. Electricity failed. Further major quakes occurred on 3
February and 4 February leaving 3 000 people homeless. The earthquake
activity continued into March. A great number of island inhabitants could not
return to their homes for a long period of time due to the continued
aftershocks. In addition, public buildings suffered significant damage. Schools
and nursery schools were closed until mid-February. Falling rocks and
landslides made roads impassable. The plausible evidence provided allows concluding
that the major part of the region’s population was directly affected.

(8) 
As regards the requirement to demonstrate
serious and lasting repercussions on the living conditions and the economic
stability of the region, the application presents the consequences of the
disaster for the whole region of the Ionian Islands, whereby the most serious
impact is concentrated on Kefalonia and Ithaki where houses, public buildings,
infrastructures and networks, port and airport facilities, as well as cultural,
education and healthcare venues suffered extensive damage. The application
describes the serious effects on the population, provides details on the
economic consequences, in particular as regards the tourism sector and the
farming/fishing sector, which have further worsened the already slowed-down
economy of the island. However, the economic consequences go beyond and
seriously impact on the whole region. In particular tourism, the single most
important economic sector is suffering from the physical damage to infrastructures
and cultural sites and from cancellations. Due to the failure to operate a
satisfactory road and sea communication link and the disruption of the economic
lives of local people, many enterprises have gone out of business. Moreover,
Greece reports that as a consequence of the first major earthquake in Kefalonia
100 houses have to be demolished, approximately 1 100 houses have suffered
significant damage and 1 400 houses have suffered less severe damage and
are temporarily unsuitable for habitation. Problems in the water supply and
sewage networks further worsen the living conditions.

(9) 
The cost of essential emergency operations
eligible under Article 3(2) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 has
been estimated by the Greek authorities at EUR 76,8 million and has
been broken  down by type of operation. The largest share relates to the
immediate restoration of the road network amounting to
EUR 50 million.

(10) 
The affected region is eligible as a
"transition region" under the European Structural and Investment
(ESI) Funds (2014-2020). The Greek authorities have not signalled to the
Commission their intention to reallocate funding from the ESI Funds programmes
for the Ionian Islands towards recovery measures.

(11) 
The Greek authorities indicated that there is no
insurance coverage of eligible cost.

2.3         Slovenia – Ice storm

(1) 
Slovenia was affected by
some of the worst winter blizzards for decades that hit parts of Europe,
affecting several countries including Croatia, Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria. Slovenia was affected mostly between 30 January and 27 February 2014, with
almost half of the nation's forests been damaged by ice, while one in four
homes was left without power, as heavy snow brought down electricity trees and
lines.

(2) 
The application from Slovenia was received on 4
April 2014, within the deadline of 10 weeks after the first damage was recorded
on 30 January 2014.

(3) 
The ice storm is of natural origin and therefore
falls within the main field of application of the Solidarity Fund.

(4) 
The Slovene authorities estimated total direct
damage at EUR 428 733 722. This amount represents 1,23 % of
Slovenia's GNI and exceeds the threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund of
EUR 209,6 million applicable to Slovenia in 2014 (i.e. 0,6 % of
GNI based on 2012 data). As the estimated total direct damage exceeds the
threshold the disaster qualifies as a “major natural disaster”. Total direct
damage is the basis for the calculation of the amount of financial assistance.
The financial assistance may only be used for essential emergency operations as
defined in Article 3 of the Regulation.

(5) 
As regards the impact and consequences of the
disaster, the Slovene authorities report severe damage to forests, electric
power facilities, public and private buildings, businesses and to the transport
and road network. 160 out of 212 municipalities in twelve Slovenian regions
were affected. 62 cultural heritage sites were damaged either by ice, snow or
floods. Due to the harsh conditions and the damage to power lines, 120 000
households were affected by the disconnected supply of electricity,
representing over 15 % of Slovenia's population. Through the EU Civil
Protection Mechanism and also bilaterally, 172 electrical generator sets of
which 83 of high-capacity were provided to Slovenia from 11 countries. In
total, 1 400 electrical generator sets and generators were installed in
the affected areas throughout Slovenia with the aim of supplying electricity
for urgent needs of the affected inhabitants and for the operation of drinking
water pumping sites. At the peak of the events, 40 % of primary schools,
secondary institutions and kindergartens were closed. In addition, the damage
to the forest sector is significant. Slovenia estimates that over 50 % of
all forests were damaged (amounting to EUR 214 million). Cleaning up
and restoration measures are expected to last for an extended period of time.
The application demonstrated that the ice storm caused significant damage.

(6) 
The cost of essential emergency operations
eligible under Article 3(2) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 has
been estimated by the Slovene authorities at EUR 266,0 million and
has been broken down by type of operation. The largest share of the cost of
emergency operations (over EUR 80 million) concerns recovery
operations in the field of infrastructure and energy.

(7) 
The affected regions partly fall under the
category of "less developed regions" and partly under “more developed
regions” of the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds (2014-2020). The
Slovenian authorities have not signalled to the Commission their intention to
reallocate funding from the ESI Funds programmes for Slovenia towards recovery
measures.

(8) 
The Slovenian authorities indicated that there
is no insurance coverage of eligible cost.

2.4         Croatia – Ice and floods

(1) 
Croatia was affected by
the same weather phenomenon which led Slovenia to apply for EU Solidarity Fund.
Particularly, the northwest regions and part of the northern Adriatic were
affected. In addition, as of 12 February, the melting ice and snow resulted in
flooding which caused additional damage to important public basic
infrastructures and private and public property.

(2) 
The application from Croatia was received on 9
April 2014, within the deadline of 10 weeks after the first damage was recorded
on 31 January 2014.

(3) 
The ice storm and flooding are of natural origin
and therefore fall within the main field of application of the Solidarity Fund.

(4) 
The Croatian authorities estimated total direct
damage at EUR 291 904 630. This amount represents 0,69 % of
Croatia's GNI and exceeds the threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund of
EUR 254,2 million applicable to Croatia in 2014 (i.e. 0,6 % of
GNI based on 2012 data). As the estimated total direct damage exceeds the
threshold the disaster qualifies as a “major natural disaster”. Total direct
damage is the basis for the calculation of the amount of financial assistance.
The financial assistance may only be used for essential emergency operations as
defined in Article 3 of the Regulation.

(5) 
As regards the impact and consequences of the
disaster, the Croatian authorities report that 5 areas were affected:
Primorje-Gorski Kotar, Karlovac, Sisak-Moslavina, Varaždin and Zagreb. Due to the heavy weight of ice on trees and infrastructure, trees fell and trunks
cracked, while power lines (covered up to 10 cm of ice) snapped, making
roads impassable and aggravating the situation by leaving many settlements
without electricity. As a consequence of the power failure the public water
supply was interrupted during the entire period of the ice storm affecting heavily
the daily lives of the population as well as the functioning of public
institutions and businesses. Fallen trees made roads impassable so that the
affected population could not get to work and some were cut off. In order to
assist the elderly population and areas cut off, Special Forces were drafted
in. Fallen trees also resulted in a five-day halt in railway traffic on the
M202 Zagreb-Rijeka line. The situation was similar to the public road network. Croatia reports that the entire 35 kV network (93 km) was affected; a total of
503 km of power lines and 98 electric towers were damaged. The ice storm
affected an area of over 56 000 of hectares of forests of which nearly 10
000 hectares were destroyed. In summary, 1 180 houses and 1 390 farm
buildings were flooded and a total of 3 720 inhabitants were affected by
the floods. The UNHCR assisted the Croatian Red Cross to alleviate the plight
of the victims of record flooding in the city of Sisak. In addition to that, Croatia reported several landslides causing damage to the transport infrastructure.

(6) 
The cost of essential emergency operations
eligible under Article 3(2) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 has
been estimated by the Croatian authorities at EUR 135,2 million and
has been broken down by type of operation. The largest share of the cost of
emergency operations (over EUR 105,4 million) concerns cleaning up
operations of disaster stricken areas and natural zones.

(7) 
The affected regions fall under the category of
"less developed regions" under the Structural Funds (2014-2020). The
Croatian authorities have not signalled to the Commission their intention to reallocate
funding from the ESI Funds programmes for Croatia towards recovery measures.

(8) 
The Croatian authorities indicated that there is
no insurance coverage of eligible cost.

3.           Financing

As solidarity was the central justification for the creation of the Fund,
the Commission takes the view that aid from the Fund should be progressive.
That means that, according to previous practice, the portion of the damage exceeding
the threshold (i.e. 0,6% of GNI or EUR 3 billion in 2002 prices,
whichever is the lower amount) should give rise to higher aid intensity than
damage up to the threshold. The rate applied in the past for defining the allocations
for major disasters is 2,5 % of total direct damage under the threshold
and 6 % for the part of the damage above. The methodology for calculating
Solidarity Fund aid was set out in the 2002-2003 Annual Report on the
Solidarity Fund and accepted by the Council and the European Parliament.

It is proposed to apply the same percentages and to grant the following
aid amounts:

Disaster || Direct damage (EUR) || Threshold (million EUR) || Amount based on 2,5 % (EUR) || Amount based on 6 % (EUR) || Total amount of aid proposed (EUR) ||

Italy flooding || 652 418 691 || 3 752,330 || 16 310 467 || ~ || 16 310 467 ||

Greece earthquake || 147 332 790 || 1 168,231 || 3 683 320 || ~ || 3 683 320 ||

Slovenia ice / storm || 428 733 722 || 209,587 || 5 239 675 || 13 148 803 || 18 388 478 ||

Croatia ice /flooding || 291 904 630 || 254,229 || 6 355 725 || 2 260 538 || 8 616 263 ||

TOTAL || 46 998 528

As this is the first mobilisation decision of 2014, the total amount of
aid proposed above complies with the ceiling provisions of the Multi-Annual
Financial Framework (MFF) regulation of EUR 530,6 million (EUR 500 million
in 2011 prices) and it is also ensured that the required one quarter of this
amount will be available on  1st October 2014 in order to cover needs arising
until the end of the year.

In conclusion, it is proposed to mobilise the Solidarity Fund for each of
these cases and to enter the corresponding appropriations into budget 2014 on
budget item 13 06 01, both in commitment and in payment
appropriations.

As the Solidarity Fund is a special instrument as defined in the MFF
regulation, the corresponding appropriations should be budgeted outside the
corresponding MFF ceilings.

4.           Summary
table by MFF heading

Heading || Budget 2014 (incl. AB 1 and DAB 2 and 4/2014) || Draft Amending Budget 5/2014 || Budget 2014 (incl. AB 1 and DAB 2 to 5/2014)

CA || PA || CA || PA || CA || PA

1. || Smart and inclusive growth || 63 986 340 779 || 66 374 487 058 || || || 63 986 340 779 || 66 374 487 058

Ceiling || 63 973 000 000 || || || || 63 973 000 000 ||

Margin || 75 989 221 || || || || 75 989 221 ||

1a || Competitiveness for growth and jobs || 16 484 010 779 || 12 028 322 326 || || || 16 484 010 779 || 12 028 322 326

Ceiling || 16 560 000 000 || || || || 16 560 000 000 ||

Margin || 75 989 221 || || || || 75 989 221 ||

1b || Economic social and territorial cohesion || 47 502 330 000 || 54 346 164 732 || || || 47 502 330 000 || 54 346 164 732

Ceiling || 47 413 000 000 || || || || 47 413 000 000 ||

Margin || -89 330 000 || || || || -89 330 000 ||

Flexibility Instrument || 89 330 000 || || || || 89 330 000 ||

Margin || 0 || || || || 0 ||

2. || Sustainable growth: natural resources || 59 267 214 684 || 56 564 930 369 || || || 59 267 214 684 || 56 564 930 369

Ceiling || 59 303 000 000 || || || || 59 303 000 000 ||

Margin || 35 785 316 || || || || 35 785 316 ||

Of which: European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — Market related expenditure and direct payments || 43 778 100 000 || 43 776 956 403 || || || 43 778 100 000 || 43 776 956 403

Sub-ceiling || 44 130 000 000 || || || || 44 130 000 000 ||

Net transfer between EAGF and EAFRD || 351 900 000 || || || || 351 900 000 ||

Margin || || || || || ||

3. || Security and citizenship || 2 171 998 732 || 1 677 039 976 || || || 2 171 998 732 || 1 677 039 976

Ceiling || 2 179 000 000 || || || || 2 179 000 000 ||

Margin || 7 001 268 || || || || 7 001 268 ||

4. || Global Europe || 8 325 000 000 || 6 842 004 256 || || || 8 325 000 000 || 6 842 004 256

Ceiling || 8 335 000 000 || || || || 8 335 000 000 ||

Margin || 10 000 000 || || || || 10 000 000 ||

5. || Administration || 8 404 517 081 || 8 405 389 881 || || || 8 404 517 081 || 8 405 389 881

Ceiling || 8 721 000 000 || || || || 8 721 000 000 ||

Margin || 316 482 919 || || || || 316 482 919 ||

Of which: Administrative expenditure of the institutions || 6 797 392 438 || 6 798 265 238 || || || 6 797 392 438 || 6 798 265 238

Sub-ceiling || 7 056 000 000 || || || || 7 056 000 000 ||

Margin || 258 607 562 || || || || 258 607 562 ||

6. || Compensations || 28 600 000 || 28 600 000 || || || 28 600 000 || 28 600 000

Ceiling || 29 000 000 || || || || 29 000 000 ||

Margin || 400 000 || || || || 400 000 ||

Total || 142 183 671 276 || 139 892 451 540 || || || 142 183 671 276 || 139 892 451 540

Ceiling || 142 540 000 000 || 135 866 000 000 || || || 142 540 000 000 || 135 866 000 000

Flexibility Instrument || 89 330 000 || || || || 89 330 000 ||

Contingency Margin || || 4 026 700 000 || || || || 4 026 700 000

Margin || 445 658 724 || 248 460 || || || 445 658 724 || 248 460

|| Special Instruments || 456 181 000 || 350 000 000 || 46 998 528 || 46 998 528 || 503 179 528 || 396 998 528

Grand Total || 142 639 852 276 || 140 242 451 540 || || || 142 686 850 804 || 140 289 450 068

[1]               OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[2]               OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.

[3]               OJ L 51, 20.2.2014, p. 1.

[4]               OJ L 204,
11.07.2014, p.1.

[5]               COM(2014) 234, 15.4.2014.

[6]               COM(2014)
329, 28.5.2014.

[7]               COM(2014)461,
09.07.2014.

[8]               Regulation
(EU) No 661/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 establishing the European Union
Solidarity Fund, OJ L 189/143 of 27.6.2014.

[9]               Annual report 2002-2003 and Report on the experience gained
after one year of applying the new instrument, COM(2004)397 final of 26.5.2004.