alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1300.5 Additional publication requirement for agricultural products and fertilizer. ( a ) With respect to transportation of agricultural products (including grain, as defined in 7 U.S.C. 75, and all products thereof) and fertilizer, a rail carrier shall publish, make available, and retain for public inspection its currently effective rates, schedules of rates, charges, and other service terms, and any scheduled changes to such rates, charges, and service terms. This requirement is in addition to the requirements imposed by §§ 1300.2, 1300.3, and 1300.4 of this part.
( b ) The information published under this section must include an accurate description of the services offered to the public; must provide the specific applicable rates (or the basis for calculating the specific applicable rates), charges, and service terms; and must be arranged in a way that allows for the determination of the exact rate, charges, and service terms applicable to any given shipment (or to any given group of shipments). Increases, reductions and other changes must be symbolized or highlighted in some way to facilitate ready identification of the changes, the nature of those changes and their effective dates.
( c ) A rail carrier must make the information available at offices where it normally keeps rate information. Access to the information at such offices must be provided to any person, without charge, during normal business hours. If a rail carrier is a Class I rail carrier, it must also make the information readily available online to any person without charge. Class I rail carriers may require persons accessing such information to register, but such registration requirements may not be overly burdensome, must provide timely access to the information, and cannot prevent specific types of persons from obtaining the information. Persons having difficulty accessing the information required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may either send a written inquiry addressed to the Director, Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance or telephone the Board's Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance.
( d ) A rail carrier must also make the required publications available to all persons (hereinafter referred to as subscribers) who have subscribed to a publication service operated either by the rail carrier itself or by an agent acting at the rail carrier's direction. Such publications may be made available either in printed or in electronic form as agreed to by the parties. Any scheduled changes must be published in a manner that provides timely notice to subscribers. A rail carrier may impose reasonable charges for such publications. Publications may be limited to the specific information requested by the subscriber, and charges for such limited publications should be set accordingly.
[61 FR 35140, July 5, 1996, as amended at 82 FR 31277, July 6, 2017]
§ 1570.301 Fraudulent use or manufacture; responsibilities of persons. ( a ) No person may use or attempt to use a credential, security threat assessment, access control medium, or identification medium issued or conducted under this subchapter that was issued or conducted for another person.
( b ) No person may make, produce, use or attempt to use a false or fraudulently created access control medium, identification medium or security threat assessment issued or conducted under this subchapter.
( c ) No person may tamper or interfere with, compromise, modify, attempt to circumvent, or circumvent TWIC access control procedures.
( d ) No person may cause or attempt to cause another person to violate paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2003


The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business, Inc. ("Issuer")
for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

     a).  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b).  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

     This Certification is executed as of August 11, 2003.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                                      /s/ Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


                                       30
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 27, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|NEW HAMPSHIRE MUTUAL BANCORP | * 3A1         | New Hampshire Mutual Bancorp, Manchester, New Hampshire to become a mutual holding company through the acquisition of Meredith Village Savings Bank, Meredith, New Hampshire, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act.                                     | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available
|NEW HAMPSHIRE MUTUAL BANCORP | * 3A5* 3A3    | New Hampshire Mutual Bancorp, Manchester, New Hampshire, to acquire Merrimack Bancorp, MHC, Concord, New Hampshire, and its subsidiary bank, Merrimack County Savings Bank, Concord, New Hampshire,  pursuant to sections 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5) of the BHC Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 10, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PATRIOT FINANCIAL PARTNERS LP | CIC           | Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, GP, LLC, Patriot Financial Managers, L.P., Patriot Financial Manager, LLC. and Messrs. Ira M. Lubert, W. Kirk Wycoff and James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to purchase up to 24.9 percent of Porter Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, KY. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/21/2011
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 09/21/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,767
<PP&E>                                          12,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,224
<BONDS>                                          3,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           303
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,514
<SALES>                                         22,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,266
<CGS>                                           14,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
#### Judge of Probate *v.*Couch *& a.*

An administrator is not liable upon his bond for neglect to pay a claim against an estate administered as insolvent, before the probate court has accepted the commissioner’s report allowing the claim and made a decree for distribution, notwithstanding the administrator has admitted the validity of the claim and promised to pay it.

Debt, on an administrator’s bond. This is the same case as *Judge of Probate*v. *Couch, ante*39. The plaintiff amended his replica*507tion, alleging that the estate was administered as insolvent; that one half the claim of Adams, plaintiff in interest, was allowed by the commissioner; that the administrator undertook to settle and pay the claims against the estate without the acceptance of the commissioner’s report; and that, after the report was made and filed, and before the commencement of this suit, the administrator admitted the whole claim of Adams, and promised to pay it.

*Stickney*and Hatch, for the plaintiff.

*Bartlett*and *Wiggin*Pernald, for the defendants.

Bingham, J.

We have two methods of settling estates of deceased persons, the solvent and the insolvent. By the solvent course, debts due the estate and claims against it are settled by the administrator, or, if they are disputable, they are adjudicated in actions brought by or against him. And it is unnecessary that a claim be established by a judgment to enable a creditor to sue the administrator on his bond if the claim is not disputable and the administrator admits its validity, but unduly neglects or refuses to pay it. In such case the idle and expensive ceremony of procuring a judgment is not required. G. L., *c.*198; *Judge of Probate*v. Briggs, 5 N. H. 66, 70, 71; *Judge of Probate*v. *Locke,*6 N. H. 396; *Judge of Probate*v. Adams, 49 N. H. 150, 153. In the settlement of an estate in the insolvent course, the administrator cannot adjust claims against it, and no action can be commenced or prosecuted against him. But all claims are examined by commissioners appointed for that purpose, and, until their report has been accepted and decree made for distribution, the administrator has no authority to pay any claims against the estate. G. L. *c.*198, *s.*8; *Probate Court*v. VanDuzer, 13 Vt. 135; *Judge of Probate*v. Adams, *supra.*The replication is insufficient.

*Case discharged.*

Clabk and Stanley, J J., did not sit: the others concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 133 (Thursday, July 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 38089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Disorders; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate requests 
for preclinical development resources for potential new therapeutics 
for type 1 diabetes. The outcome of the evaluation will be a decision 
whether NIDDK should support the request and make available contract 
resources for development of the potential therapeutic to improve the 
treatment or prevent the development of type 1 diabetes and its 
complications. The research proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the proposed research projects, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Type 1 Diabetes--Rapid Access to Intervention 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, National Institute of Diabetes 
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
    Date: July 31, 2007.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To evaluate requests for preclinical development 
resources for potential new therapeutics for type 1 diabetes and its 
complications.
    Place: 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dr. Lisa Spain, Program Director, Immunobiology 
of Type 1 Diabetes and Autoimmune Endocrine Diseases, Division of 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, NIDDK, NIH, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5460, 301-451-9871.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 98.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 3, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3401 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## EPA Reg. No. 241-74

Vol. 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending November 3, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|SMARTBANK, PIGEON FORGE, TENNESSEE | 3532641 | 06/11/2012 | 10/29/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|TRISUMMIT BK, KINGSPORT, TENNESSEE | 3546899 | 04/30/2012 | 10/28/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
###### Editorial Note on Part 106

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 106.35 Interim final rule.

An interim final rule is issued without first issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking and accepting public comments and sets out new regulatory requirements and their effective date. PHMSA may issue an interim final rule if it finds, for good cause, that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. PHMSA will clearly set out this finding in the interim final rule. After receiving and reviewing public comments, as well as any other relevant documents, PHMSA may revise the interim final rule and then issue a final rule.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1751.

#### United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. St. Elizabeth Med. Ctr.

Montgomery App. No. 16518. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### Sarah H. Barnes et al., Respondents, *v.*Southfield Beach Company et al., Defendants, and Southfield Beach Railroad Company, Appellant.

Reported below, 136 App. Div. 896.

(Argued May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 8, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

The motion was made on the ground that the appellant had instituted condemnation proceedings to obtain title to the property in question, which proceedings were inconsistent with the appeal and made the question at issue academic.

*Stuart G. Gibboney*for motion.

*Lewis H. Freedmom*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### § 1582.105 [Reserved]
98-2679.

#### State ex rel. Hightower v. Haskins.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Francis Vail, an Alleged Incompetent Person. F. Gilleard Vail, Appellant; Ophelia Vail, Respondent.

*Matter of Vail,*137 App. Div. 220, appeal dismissed.

(Argued September 26, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 11,1910, which reversed an order of Special Term appointing a commission in lunacy.

*Frank F. Carstarphen*for appellant.

*De Witt Bailey*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cüllen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
#### § 7.180 Kotzebue Sound, AK.

A line drawn from Cape Espenberg Light to latitude 66°52′ N. longitude 163°28′ W.; and thence to Cape Krusenstern Light.