alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

34981 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 121 

Monday, June 25, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of June 22, 2007 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Western Balkans 

On June 26, 2001, by Executive Order 13219, I declared a national emergency 

with respect to the Western Balkans pursuant to the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the unusual and 

extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United 

States constituted by the actions of persons engaged in, or assisting, sponsoring, or supporting (i) extremist violence in the Republic of Macedonia 

and elsewhere in the Western Balkans region, or (ii) acts obstructing implementation of the Dayton Accords in Bosnia or United Nations Security 

Council Resolution 1244 of June 10, 1999, in Kosovo. I subsequently amended 

that order in Executive Order 13304 of May 28, 2003. 

Because the actions of persons threatening the peace and international stabilization efforts in the Western Balkans continue to pose an unusual and 

extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United 

States, the national emergency declared on June 26, 2001, and the measures 

adopted on that date and thereafter to deal with that emergency, must 

continue in effect beyond June 26, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 

continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the Western 

Balkans. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

June 22, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–3143 

Filed 6–22–07; 10:40 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 14, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128545 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices
ROBERT MAY, TRUSTEE,Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee,

v SC: 128545 COA: 251769 Otsego CC: 02-010021-CZ MCN OIL & GAS COMPANY, Defendant/Counter-Defendant/ Third-Party-Defe ndant-Appellee,

and

STANLEY T. MAY, TR USTEE and DEVONIAN ENERGY, INC., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees,

and

IRMA L. RICHARDS ON, MARTIN L. RICHARDSON, RUTH SCHULIEN RICHARDSON, Third-Party Defendants-Appellants,

and

PAXTON RESOURCES, LLC, QUICKSILVER RESOURCES, INC., AL BERT QUALL LIVING TRUST, CHRIS MELLIN G, HARRY S. MELLING ESTATE, MICHAEL J. MOIR,

WILLIAM J. BELANG ER, SANDRA M. BELANGER, PHILLIP G. BOSWOOD TRUST, JOHN A. BOTT TRUST, H. KEITH MILLER, RICHARD NEDOW, ROBI N NEDOW, GERALD LEROY LANGWEROWSKI, MARCELLA S._______________________________________ __ 2

LANGWEROWSKI, WILL IAM J. MUZYL TRUST, SCOTT D. LAMPERT TRUST, AND WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice of a decision to designate a class of employees at the W.R. Grace site, Erwin, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.  On June 22, 2007, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who were monitored or should have been monitored for potential exposure to thorium while working in any of the 100 series buildings or Buildings 220, 230, 233, 234, 301, or 310 at the W.R. Grace site at Erwin, Tennessee for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days from January 1, 1958 through December 31, 1970, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.
      ( print page 41510)    
                        This designation will become effective on July 22, 2007, unless Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date.  After this effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to the SEC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number).  Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV*.                    

John Howard

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 07-3686 Filed 7-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending June 1, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                   | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FRANKLIN SYNERGY BK, FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE | 3635533 | 12/03/2012 | 04/25/2013     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 172.505 Placarding for subsidiary hazards. ( a ) Each transport vehicle, freight container, portable tank, unit load device, or rail car that contains a poisonous material subject to the “Poison Inhalation Hazard” shipping description of § 172.203(m) must be placarded with a POISON INHALATION HAZARD or POISON GAS placard, as appropriate, on each side and each end, in addition to any other placard required for that material in § 172.504. Duplication of the POISON INHALATION HAZARD or POISON GAS placard is not required.
( b ) In addition to the RADIOACTIVE placard which may be required by § 172.504(e), each transport vehicle, portable tank or freight container that contains 454 kg (1,001 pounds) or more gross weight of non-fissile, fissile-excepted, or fissile uranium hexafluoride must be placarded with a CORROSIVE placard and a POISON placard on each side and each end.
( c ) Each transport vehicle, portable tank, freight container or unit load device that contains a material which has a subsidiary hazard of being dangerous when wet, as defined in § 173.124 of this subchapter, shall be placarded with DANGEROUS WHEN WET placards, on each side and each end, in addition to the placards required by § 172.504.
( d ) Hazardous materials that possess secondary hazards may exhibit subsidiary placards that correspond to the placards described in this part, even when not required by this part (see also § 172.519(b) (4) of this subpart).
[Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52601, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66260, Dec. 20, 1991; 57 FR 45460, Oct. 1, 1992; Amdt. 172-127, 59 FR 49133, Sept. 26, 1994; Amdt. 172-151, 62 FR 1231, Jan. 8, 1997; 62 FR 39398, July 22, 1997; 65 FR 58626, Sept. 29, 2000; 72 FR 55692, Oct. 1, 2007; 79 FR 40610, July 11, 2014; 82 FR 15874, Mar. 30, 2017]
*Monday, November 30, 1998*

MERIT DOCKET

98-2335

#### State ex rel. Salyers v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Motee, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweenet, Cook and Lundbeeg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136793 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136793 

 COA: 278278 

Oakland CC: 2007-213389-FH 

DAMINGO F. BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DAMINGO 

FLEECION BOURGEIOS, a/k/a DAMINGO 

FLEECION BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DAMNGO 

FLEECAION BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DEAN

BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DERON SHORT, a/k/a 

DOMINGO FELECIANO BOURGEOIS, a/k/a 

TAIJON BOURGEOIS, a/k/a WILLIE B. JONES,

a/k/a WILLIE JONE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
#### The Eaton, Cole & Burnham Company, *Respondents, v.*Edward Martin, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 1544.303 Bomb or air piracy threats. ( a ) *Flight: Notification.* Upon receipt of a specific and credible threat to the security of a flight, the aircraft operator must— ( 1 ) Immediately notify the ground and in-flight security coordinators of the threat, any evaluation thereof, and any measures to be applied; and
( 2 ) Ensure that the in-flight security coordinator notifies all crewmembers of the threat, any evaluation thereof, and any measures to be applied; and
( 3 ) Immediately notify the appropriate airport operator.
( b ) *Flight: Inspection.* Upon receipt of a specific and credible threat to the security of a flight, each aircraft operator must attempt to determine whether or not any explosive or incendiary is present by doing the following: ( 1 ) Conduct a security inspection on the ground before the next flight or, if the aircraft is in flight, immediately after its next landing.
( 2 ) If the aircraft is on the ground, immediately deplane all passengers and submit that aircraft to a security search.
( 3 ) If the aircraft is in flight, immediately advise the pilot in command of all pertinent information available so that necessary emergency action can be taken.
( c ) *Ground facility.* Upon receipt of a specific and credible threat to a specific ground facility at the airport, the aircraft operator must: ( 1 ) Immediately notify the appropriate airport operator.
( 2 ) Inform all other aircraft operators and foreign air carriers at the threatened facility.
( 3 ) Conduct a security inspection.
( d ) *Notification.* Upon receipt of any bomb threat against the security of a flight or facility, or upon receiving information that an act or suspected act of air piracy has been committed, the aircraft operator also must notify TSA. If the aircraft is in airspace under other than U.S. jurisdiction, the aircraft operator must also notify the appropriate authorities of the State in whose territory the aircraft is located and, if the aircraft is in flight, the appropriate authorities of the State in whose territory the aircraft is to land. Notification of the appropriate air traffic controlling authority is sufficient action to meet this requirement.
§ 172.540 POISON GAS placard. ( a ) Except for size and color, the POISON GAS placard must be as follows:
( b ) In addition to complying with § 172.519, the background on the POISON GAS placard and the symbol must be white. The background of the upper diamond must be black and the lower point of the upper diamond must be 65 mm (25 ⁄ 8 inches) above the horizontal center line. The text, class number, and inner border must be black.
[62 FR 39408, July 22, 1997]
#### Jacob W. Staley et al., as Executors of Jacob Stalee, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*Michael D. Murray et al., Respondents.

*Staley*v. *Murray,*130 App. Div. 892, affirmed.

(Argued January 11, 1911;

decided January 27, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 19, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

*Philip Keck*for appellants.

*N. H. Anibal*and *M. D. Murray*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.2 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 632]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.2  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. INGLIS, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Tuesday, May 2, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
#### § 340.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures for assigning priority for use by defense agencies, on commercial terms, of commercial shipping services, containers and chassis, and port facilities and services and for allocating vessels employed in commercial shipping services, containers and chassis, and port facilities and services for exclusive use by defense agencies (as defined in 340.2), at any time where appropriate under provision of title I of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 *et seq.*) as determined by the Secretary of Transportation. The procedures will provide the means to require vessel and port operators to provide defense agencies with existing commercial services and facilities not obtainable through established transportation procurement procedures. Thus the procedures will minimize interference with commercial operations and ensure rapid response to defense needs in times of crisis or war.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31

April 30, 2002

Mr. M. Rufus Woodard
Vice President, Merchandising
Brookstone Company, Inc.
17 Riverside Street

Nashua, NH 03062

Dear Rudy:

This is to confirm our recent discussions relative to the terms of your
employment with Brookstone, specifically with respect to your severance package.

In the unlikely event that your employment is terminated by the Company other
than for cause, you will receive a severance package consisting of your base
salary for a maximum period of up to twelve (12) months. Any self-employment or
other employment income earned during the 12 month period following your
termination shall reduce the severance package payable to you.

All other terms of your employment, including your current base salary, MIB
bonus eligibility and benefits, are not affected by this letter. The actual
provisions of each benefit plan or insurance policy will govern if there is any
discrepancy. If anything here is inconsistent with any federal, state, or local
laws, Brookstone will comply with its obligations under such laws. The policies
and benefits that are summarized here have been voluntarily adopted by
Brookstone and may be changed from time to time, with or without notice, and do
not create any contractual rights or obligations, nor do they create a contract
of employment for any specific term.

Brookstone values its employees and looks forward to a mutually satisfactory
employment relationship. It is of course understood, however, that you are an
employee-at-will and that neither you nor Brookstone is obligated to continue in
our employment relationship if either of us does not wish to do so.

Kindly indicate your acknowledgment and acceptance of the terms of this letter
by signing the enclosed copy on the space provided. Please keep one copy for
your records and return the signed copy to this office.

Sincerely,


Michael Anthony
Chairman, President & CEO

MA/dab



-----------------------------------                  ---------------
M. Rufus Woodard                                     Date

                                                                              72
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 24

- 00142

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24

- 0153

- 431

Before Womack

, J.; Sudderth , C.J.; and Wallac h

, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### N ANDINI 

### D EVI AND 

### G REGORY 

### G INN



### , Appellants

V



### .

Z VETATWO



### , LLC AND 

### S PARSHTWO



### , LTD. , Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “ Appellant Nandini Devi’s Unopposed Voluntary Motion

to Dismiss Appeal ” and “Appellant Gregory Ginn’s Unopposed Voluntary Motion to

Dismiss Appeal.” We grant both of the motion s and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a)(1)

, 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : July 25, 2024
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Kenneth T. Neilson, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HudsonUnited Bancorp; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

        a)  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

        b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

        c)  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

        a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

        b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: August 13, 2003