alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes FlemingRegional Administrator

U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency

61 Forsyth Street, S.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3 104Dear Ms. Fleming:

Re: Mississippi Nitrogen Dioxide Infrastructure SIP

Enclosed are documents related to Mississippi’s Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) tocomply with the requirements of Section 11 0(a)( 1) and (2) ofthe Federal Clean Air Act regarding the

2010 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide. We are transmitting, under

separate cover, additional copies to Lynorae Benjamin of your agency.

We certify that a 30-day public comment period was held regarding the SIP. The public comment

period ended February 22, 2013. EPA Region 4 submitted a comment letter during the public

comment period. There were no other comments received. The suggested changes recommended by

EPA were considered minor and were integrated into the SIP.

We feel that this Nitrogen Dioxide Infrastructure SIP submittal is complete. Therefore, we are

requesting EPA approval of this SIP into the federally approved Mississippi State ImplementationPlan.

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me or Maya Rao ofmy staff at

(601) 961-5242.

Very truly yours,.

Trud’ D. FisherExecutive Director

TDF/cjs

Enclosurescc: Ms. Beverly Banister, EPA Region IV

OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL

PosT OFFIcE Box 2261 • JAcKsON, MississiPPi 39225-2261 • TEL: (601) 961-5171 • FAx: (601) 354-6612 • www.deq.state.ms.us

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLoYER
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | Actions under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending December 12, 2009

----

Bank Branches, DomesticDallasComerica Bank, Dallas, Texas  -- to establish a branch at 1212 South Pacific Coast Highway, Redondo Beach, California.					-Approved, December 9, 2009 					RichmondMiddleburg Bank, Middleburg, Virginia  -- to establish a branch at 5372 Discovery Park Boulevard, Suite 101, Williamsburg.					-Approved, December 11, 2009 					AtlantaTriSummit Bank, Kingsport, Tennessee  -- to establish a branch at 1999 East Stone Drive, Kingsport.					-Approved, December 9, 2009 					

Bank Holding CompaniesDallasBankCap Partners Fund I, L.P., Dallas, Texas; BankCap Partners GP, LP; and BankCap Equity Fund, LLC  -- to acquire First Bankshares, Inc., Suffolk,Virginia, and indirectly acquire SuffolkFirst Bank, and for BCP Fund I Virginia Holdings, LLC, Dallas, Texas, to become a bank holding company and to acquire First Bancshares and indirectly aquire SuffolkFirst Bank.					-Approved, December 7, 2009 					Director, BS&RClinton Financial Services, MHC, Clinton, Massachusetts, and Wachusett Financial Services  -- relief from certain commitments.					-Granted, December 10, 2009 					AtlantaHeritage First Bancshares, Inc., Rome, Georgia  -- relief from a commitment.					-Withdrawn, December 7, 2009 					

Bank MergersSecretary1st United Bank, Boca Raton, Florida  -- to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Republic Federal Bank, N.A., Miami.					-Approved, December 11, 2009 					St. LouisArvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas  -- to purchase the assets and assume the liabilities of SolutionsBank, Overland Park, Kansas, and to retain the acquired facilities as branches.					-Approved, December 11, 2009 					

Change In Bank ControlChicagoCity State Bancorporation, Inc., Central City, Iowa  -- change in bank control of City State; its subsidiary holding company, M.S.B. Corporation, Central City; and its subsidiary bank, City State Bank.					-Permitted, December 10, 2009 					

Extensions Of TimeChicagoM&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, Wisconsin  -- extension to March 18, 2010, to establish a branch at Moorland Boulevard and National Avenue, New Berlin.					-Granted, December 10, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | Actions under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: December 17, 2009
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of County Bank Corp on form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Joseph H. Black, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The Information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph H. Black
--------------------------
Joseph H. Black
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2004

I, Susanne Dickey, Assistant Financial Officer of the Company, concur with the
above statement.

/s/Susanne R. Dickey
--------------------------
Susanne R. Dickey
Assistant Financial Officer
March 19, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.701 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart prescribes procedures for the issuance, modification and termination of approvals, and the submission of registrations and reports, as required by this chapter.
( b ) The procedures of this subpart are in addition to any requirements in subchapter C of this chapter applicable to a specific approval, registration or report. If compliance with both a specific requirement of subchapter C of this chapter and a procedure of this subpart is not possible, the specific requirement applies.
( c ) Registration under subpart F or G of this part is not subject to the procedures of this subpart.
[Amdt. 107-38, 61 FR 21100, May 9, 1996; Amdt. 107-38, 61 FR 27948, June 3, 1996]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 14, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                      | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ELBERFELD ST BK, ELBERFELD, INDIANA         | 16748  | 08/29/2011 | 12/14/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|FIRST CMNTY BK XENIA FLORA, XENIA, ILLINOIS | 242    | 09/19/2011 | 12/23/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|MIDLAND ST BK, EFFINGHAM, ILLINOIS          | 773247 | 08/22/2011 | 12/30/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|SOUTHERN BK, POPLAR BLUFF, MISSOURI         | 272272 | 09/19/2011 | 01/09/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 179.300-1 Tanks built under these specifications shall meet the requirements of §§ 179.300 and 179.301.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 13, 1995 (94), Para 94.24 Motion to Rise]
[Page 1131]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.94.24  motion to rise

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the motion of Mr. OBEY that the Committee do now rise.

It was decided in the

Yeas

150

negative

Nays

249
```
#### William S. Anderson et al., Appellants, *v.*The New York and Harlem Railroad Company, et al., Respondents.

Reported below, 136 App. Div. 939.

(Submitted May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 11, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover damages to premises caused by the erection of an elevated railroad structure in the street. '

The motion was made upon the grounds that the notice of appeal was not served in time; that the judgment of the trial court had been unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division ; that the exceptions were frivolous and that the appeal was taken for purposes of delay only.

*Horace E. Leming*and *Alexander S. Lyman*for motion.

*L. M. Berkeley*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
# Conliri^JTrave l

People . Technology . Results . February 9 , 201 2 

# •pmumo f 'iANSPORIATIO N •':Ki: TOPERATION S 

### l^l l FE B I 5 P 3 : ! 5 Docke t Managemen t

Facility U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 _ ^ Re : Su n Countr y Slo t

Exemptio n - Docke t

Numbe r FAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an dGentlemen : Su n Country Airline s ha s requeste da n exemptio n fromth e slo t limi t fo r Ronal dReagan Washingto n Nationa l Airport (DCA ) set

fort h in § 93.123(a) , t o permi t th e FA A t o creat e air carrie r slot s durin g certai n limite dhour s fo r Su n Country' s use . Th e propose dai r carrie r slot s woul dreplac e tw o slo t

exemption s unde r

DO T Orde r

2010-12-1 6 awarde dt o Su n Country . O n January 6 , 2012 , th e Unite dState s Cour t o f Appeal s fo

r th e Distric t

o f Columbi aCircui t

vacate d th e DO T Order , an dSu n Countr) ' wil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC A an dLansing' s Capital Regio n Internationa l Airport . Specifically , Su n Country desire s on e dail y slo t durin g eac h o f th e 100 0 an d110 0 hours . Th e propose dexemptio n woul dpermi t Su n Country t o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an davoi da n inequitabl e resul t

o f th e Court' s order . Th e Su n Country DC A servic e i s essentia l t o th e economi c growt h o f th e Greate r

Lansin g Region . Th e dail y servic e i s th e onl y larg e aircraf t (737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reagan Airport , i n th e stat e o f

Michiga n outsid e o f

Detroit . Prio r

t o Sun Country , th e regiona l community hadrequeste dth e introductio n o f thi s servic e fromnumerou s othe r airlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , it i s critica l that

th e FA A take th e necessary step s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o f

th e Sun Country slot s a t th e establishe dfligh

t time s in suppor

t o f Greate r Lansing' s biisines s an deconomi c growth ^ " ' " ' " ~ -- - - - Your immediat e approva l o f thi s exemption , s o tha

t Su n Country can begi n t o ente r fligh t schedule s for

sal e for th e balanc e o f

2012 , wil l b e greatl y appreciated . Sincerely , Christophe r

U . Conli n Presiden t Conli n Travel , Inc .

An n Arbo r327 0 Washtenaw Avenu e | An n Arbor , Michiga n 48104 | Phon e 734.677.090 0 | Fa x734.677.090 1 Eas t Lansin g 150

4 E . Gran d Rive rAvenue . Suit e 20 0 | Eas t Lansing , Michiga n 4S82 3 | Phon e 517.492.140 2 | Fa x517.333.202 5 San Francisc o 35 0 Sansome , Suit e 75 0 | Sa n Francisco , Californi a 9410 4 | Phon e 415.788.405 1 | Fa x415.296.922 6 'AMERKAN i JBIgRES S CS T #1012274-1 0 www.conlintravel.co m Trave l Service s Represcnlaih- c
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.231 Ammonium nitrate emulsion, suspension or gel. ( a ) Packagings for non-bulk shipments of Ammonium nitrate emulsions, suspensions and gels must conform to the general packaging requirements of subpart B of part 173, to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group I or II performance level, and the requirements of the special provisions of column 7 of the § 172.101 table. ( 1 ) The following combination packagings are authorized: *Outer packagings:* Drums: 1B2, 1G, 1N2, 1H2 or 1D Boxes: 4B, 4C1, 4C2, 4D, 4G or 4H2 Jerricans: 3B2 of 3H2 *Inner packagings:* Glass, plastic or metal inner receptacles
( 2 ) For combination packagings, the capacity of each inner packaging must not exceed 5 liters (1.3 gallons) and the maximum authorized net weight of each outer packaging must not exceed 125 kg (275 pounds).
( 3 ) The following single packagings are authorized: Drums: 1B1, 1B2, 1H1 or 1H2 with a maximum capacity of 250 liters (66 gallons). Jerricans: 3B1, 3B2, 3H1 or 3H2 with a maximum capacity of 60 liters (15.9 gallons). Plastic receptacle in aluminum, fiber, plastic or plywood drum: 6HB1, 6HG1, 6HH1 or 6HD1with the outer drum having a maximum capacity of 250 liters (66 gallons). Plastic receptacle in aluminum wood, plywood, fiberboard, or solid plastic box: 6HB2, 6HC, 6HD2, 6HG2, or 6HH2 with the outer box having a maximum capacity of 60 liters (15.9 gallons). Glass receptacle in aluminum, fiber, or plywood drum: 6PB1, 6PF1 or 6PD1 with the outer drum having a maximum capacity of 60 liters (15.9 gallons). Glass receptacle in expanded plastic or solid plastic packaging: 6PH1 or 6PH2 with the outer packaging having a maximum capacity of 60 liters (15.9 gallons). Glass receptacle in aluminum, wood, or fiberboard box, or wickerwork hamper: 6PB2, 6PC, 6PG2 or 6PD2 with the outer box or hamper having a maximum capacity of 60 liters (15.9 gallons).
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 1160, Jan. 8, 2015]
#### § 1105.3 Information and assistance.

Information and assistance regarding the rules and the Board's environmental and historic review process is available by writing or calling the Office of Environmental Analysis.

[81 FR 8853, Feb. 23, 2016]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending December 19, 2009

----

Advisory CouncilsConsumer Advisory Council  -- appointment of ten new members and designation of Michael D. Calhoun as chair and Jim Park as vice chair for 2010.					-Announced, December 17, 2009 					

Banking Supervision & RegulationCitigroup Inc., New York, New York  -- request to redeem its TARP preferred stock.					-Approved, December 13, 2009 					Wells Fargo & Company, San Francisco, California  -- request to redeem its TARP preferred stock. 					-Approved, December 14, 2009 					

Enforcement1st Pacific Bancorp, San Diego, California, and 1st Pacific Bank of California  -- writtten agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, December 15, 2009 					Credit Suisse AG, Zurich, Switzerland  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order against Credit Suisse.					-Announced, December 16, 2009 					Regions Bank, Birmingham, Alabama  -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, December 17, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $75 billion in 28-day credit on December 14, 2009.					-Announced, December 14, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulation V (Fair Credit Reporting)  -- interagency final rules�that�require creditors to provide risk-based pricing notices to consumers who receive less favorable terms on credit because of information in the consumer's credit report.					-Approved, December 17, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: December 24, 2009
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

#### In re Report of the Commission On Continuing Legal Education. Joseph Henry Blackwell (#0001563), Respondent.

1998 TERM

ENTRY

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1992-1993 reporting period.

On August 11,1995, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent, and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3) and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7).

On November 25,1998, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies, and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. On November 25, 1998, the commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during his suspension by this court’s order of suspension. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Joseph Henry Blackwell, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law from his suspension under Gov.Bar R. X.
-----Original Message----- 

From: rbrkristin@mac.com [mailto:rbrkristin@mac.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

kristin newton 

11256 Quarry Road 

Sonora, CA 95370
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-222-CR

JEFFREY K. PAYNE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

After waiving a jury and entering an open plea of guilty, appellant Jeffrey

K. Payne appeals his conviction and thirty-year sentence for possession of

methamphetamine of four or more but less than two hundred grams with the

intent to deliver, enhanced by a prior felony conviction. See Tex. Health &
2

Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (d) (Vernon 2003); Tex. Penal Code Ann.

§ 12.42(c)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2008). We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel

avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief

and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Appellant filed a pro

se brief, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The State

declined to file a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw

on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of

Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the

record. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991);

Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no

pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s

pro se brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and

without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
3

appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial

court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 2, 2009
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.13 H.R. 1642--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1107]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.13  h.r. 1642--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the motion to suspend the rules 
and pass the bill (H.R. 1642) to extend nondiscriminatory treatment 
(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Cambodia, and for 
other purposes.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, announced that two-thirds of 
those present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```