alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Presidential Determination to Waive Military Coup-Related Provision of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006, as Carried Forward Under the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, With Respect to Pakistan

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 534(j) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (the “Act”)(Public Law 109-102), as carried forward under the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110-5)(the “Continuing Resolution”), and Public Law 107-57, as amended, I hereby determine and certify, with respect to Pakistan, that a waiver of section 508 of the Act, as carried forward under the Continuing Resolution: 

(a) would facilitate the transition to democratic rule in Pakistan; and 

(b) is important to United States efforts to respond to, deter, or prevent acts of international terrorism.

Accordingly, I hereby waive, with respect to Pakistan, section 508 of such Act, as carried forward by the Continuing Resolution.

                    You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 07-3373

Billing code 4710-10
Order entered June 29 , 202 1

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00861 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 0086 2 - CR RAYAN DHANES GANESH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On App e a l from the 282 nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 16 - 76113 - S & F16 - 76111 - S

O RDER Before the Court is appellant ’s June 8, 2021 pro se motion asking for the Court to hold a hearing to “disqualify counsel ” and to “ appoin t new effective counsel if necessary. ” The briefs have been filed ; th ese case s are at issue and will be set in due

course . Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion. S ee Dunn v. State , 819 S.W.2d 510, 520 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) ( “ A criminal defendant is no t entitled to appointed counsel of choice. Under the State and Federal Constitutions he isentitled to effective assistance of counsel, however this constitutional protection

cannot be manipulated in such a manner so as to throw the trial pr ocess into disa rray. ” ) ; Cooper v. State , No. 05

- 18

- 01246

- CR, 2019 WL 6606364, at *3 (Tex. App. Dec. 5, 2019) (pet. ref ’ d) ( “ A court has no duty to search for counsel who is agreeable to the defendant, and the right to counsel cannot be insisted upon in such a way as to o bstruct the orderly administ ration of justice. ” ) W e DI RECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to all parties as well as
to Rayan Dhanes Ganesh, TDCJ# 02192899, Telford Unit, 3899 Hwy 98, New Boston, TX 75570

. / s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
KILLAM GROUP INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 3,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                 15,921
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          13,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,291
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       40,708
<PP&E>                                                 16,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         98,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  12,284
<BONDS>                                                   774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    3
<OTHER-SE>                                             83,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           98,145
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       80,773
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          61,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        1,059
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         5,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                            2,732
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2,968
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.12

<FN>
<F1> THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY HAVE BEEN RESTATED FOR A ONE FOR
     FIVE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT EFFECTIVE IN FEBRUARY 1999.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                Subsidiary                     Jurisdiction           Ownership interest
                                             of incorporation
<S>                                          <C>                      <C>
NTELOS Cable Inc.                                Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Cable of Virginia Inc.                    Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Communications Services Inc.              Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Cornerstone Inc.                          Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Licenses Inc.                             Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Network Inc.                              Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS PCS Inc.                                  Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Telephone Inc.                            Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS Wireless Inc.                             Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS of Pennsylvania Inc.                      Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS of Maryland Inc.                          Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS of Kentucky Inc.                          Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NTELOS NetAccess Inc.                            Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

NA Communications Inc.                           Virginia             NetAccess owns 100%

Virginia RSA 6 Cellular Limited Ptrshp.          Virginia             NTELOS Wireless owns 84%; Registrant owns 16%

Richmond 20 MHz, LLC                             Delaware             Virginia RSA 6 Cellular Limited Ptrshp. owns 100%

R&B Communications, Inc.                         Virginia             Registrant owns 100%

Botetourt Leasing, Inc.                          Virginia             R&B Communication owns 100%

Roanoke & Botetourt Telephone Co.                Virginia             R&B Communication owns 100%

R&B Cable, Inc.                                  Virginia             R&B Communication owns 100%

R&B Network, Inc.                                Virginia             R&B Communication owns 100%

The Beeper Company                               Virginia             R&B Communication owns 100%

Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C.                      Virginia             NTELOS PCS owns 65%; R&B Communications owns 26%

Virginia Telecommunications Ptrshp.              Virginia             NTELOS Network owns 50%; R&B Network owns 50%

West Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C.                 Virginia             Registrant owns 45%; R&B Communications owns 34%
</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.9 Legislative Appropriations, FY 1996]
[Pages 1025-1026]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.9  legislative appropriations, fy 1996

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNNING, pursuant to House Resolution 169 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 1854) making appropriations for

[[Page 1026]]

the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, 
and for other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNNING, by unanimous consent, designated 
Mr. LINDER as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and after some 
time spent therein,
```
#### Horatio N. Ege and Benjamin W. Oris, Respondents, *v.*George Garfield, *Assignee, etc., Appellant.*

— Judgment modified so as to conform to the report of the referee, and as modified affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
#### § 1280.7 Education of employees.

All employees who have been granted a security clearance and who have occasion to handle classified materials shall be advised of the procedures outlined in 49 CFR part 1280. They shall also be required to review Executive Order 12356 and appropriate directives of the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). This shall be achieved by a memorandum to all affected employees at the time these procedures are implemented, and by appropriate instructions to new employees receiving security clearances in the future.
98-1460.

#### Headley v. Ohio Govt. Risk Mgt. Plan.

Muskingum App. No. CT970022. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the oral argument currently scheduled for February 24,1999, be continued until further order of this court.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.32 Deletions of Sponsors from Pubilc Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 654]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.32  deletions of sponsors from pubilc bills and resolutions

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 743: Mr. Fattah.
       H.J. Res. 87: Mr. Salmon.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,827,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                   216,185
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,723,639
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,532,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,348,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          251,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,031,618
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,408,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,348,302
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,518,698
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,388,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             547,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,607,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,607,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,607,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Percentage           State of
                                                                              of              Incorporation
               Parent                            Subsidiary                Ownership         or Organization
-----------------------------------      -----------------------------   --------------      -----------------
<S>                                          <C>                               <C>              <C>
D&N Financial Corporation                    D&N Bank                          100%             Federal
                                                                           
D&N Bank                                     D&N Enterprises, Inc.             100%             Michigan
                                                                           
D&N Bank                                     D&N Holdings, Inc.                100%             Michigan
                                                                           
D&N Bank                                     D&N Funding I Corp.               100%             Delaware
                                                                           
D&N Bank                                     D&N Mortgage Corporation          100%             Michigan

D&N Holdings, Inc.                           Quincy Insurance Agency, Inc.     100%             Michigan
</TABLE>
#### South Side Irrigation Company, appellant, v. John C. Brooks, appellee.

Filed December 15, 1917.

No. 19787.

1. Waters: Irrigation: Maintenance Fee. Under the written contract granting a water right, described in the opinion, the defendant did not promise to pay a maintenance fee to the irrigation company before using the water and is not liable to the company on the contract for maintenance fees before he commences taking the water provided for.

2. Irrigation Contract. 'Whether such contract might be held to be discriminatory and void is not within the issues, and not decided.

Appeal from the district court for Dawson county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*E. A. Cook*and *W. M.*Cook, for appellant.

*I. J. Nisley, contra.*

*58Cornish, J.

The defendant, “for the consideration of a perpetual water right” to certain land, gave to the plaintiff the right to construct its irrigation canal over the land. Defendant has never exercised his right to the use of water provided for, and has refused to pay a maintenance fee of one dollar an acre, alleged to be the usual charge therefor. Plaintiff’s action to recover the amount of the maintenance fee was dismissed by the trial court. Plaintiff appeals.

No water-right deed, providing for a maintenance fee, was made. It appears that before the contract was signed maintenance fee charges were talked about, but no agreement was reached. Under the written contract above described, we are of opinion that no liability arose against the defendant in favor of plaintiff for maintenance fees. Instead of taking cash for the right of way which the company got, he took by agreement the water right. It is said that if owners of water rights may, by nonusfer, be relieved from maintenance fees, the public improvement itself might thereby be caused to go into decay. This is true, but we cannot assume such to be the fact under the issues in this case. The contract as written without provision for maintenance fees may have been a beneficial one for the private company operating the canal.

( By statute in this state irrigation companies are made common carriers of water. They are not permitted to make excessive charges or discriminate between users. The defendant, as a user of water, must pay the same fees that others do. Whether the contract, as one permitting a water right without provision for use or maintenance fees, is or is likely to become an unfair burden upon other users of water, and is therefore discriminatory and void, is a question not involved in the issues presented.

Apeirmed.

Sedgwick, J., not sitting.
§ 1280.4 Responsibility for handling of classified documents. ( a ) Responsible Official. Primary responsibility for the handling of classified documents shall rest with the Assistant to the Director of the Office of Compliance and Consumer Assistance, who is also Emergency Coordinator for the Board. All documents bearing the terms “Top Secret,” “Secret,” and “Confidential” shall be delivered to the Emergency Coordinator or his/her alternate immediately upon receipt. The alternate is also an Assistant to the Director of the Office of Compliance and Consumer Assistance as set forth in § 1280.4(b) of the rules. All potential recipients of such documents shall be advised of the name of the Emergency Coordinator. In the event that the Emergency Coordinator or his/her alternate is not available to receive such documents, they shall be turned over to the Associate Director, Office of Compliance and Consumer Assistance, and secured, unopened, in the combination safe located in Room 5325 of the headquarters building until the Emergency Coordinator or alternate is available. All material not immediately deliverable to either the Emergency Coordinator, alternate, or the Associate Director, Office of Compliance and Consumer Assistance, shall be delivered at the earliest opportunity. Under no circumstances shall classified material that cannot be delivered to the Emergency Coordinator be stored other than in the designated safe in Room 5325 of the STB headquarters building.
( b ) The alternate to the Emergency Coordinator for the receipt and handling of documents mentioned in paragraph (a) of this section, shall be the other Assistant to the Director, Office of Compliance and Consumer Assistance.
( c ) Any person whose position requires access to classified information must execute Form SF #189.
( d ) Any contracts with media representatives by personnel with access to classified material and involving such material will be cleared through the Emergency Coordinator and more than one person shall be present during any briefing or interview.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 11, 1995 (64), Para 64.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 685]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.64.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. DeFAZIO:

       Page 92, line 2, strike ``or other facility'', as inserted 
     on page 14 of the committee amendment offered by Mr. Shuster.

It was decided in the

Yeas

126

negative

Nays

294
```
§ 1542.307 Incident management. ( a ) Each airport operator must establish procedures to evaluate bomb threats, threats of sabotage, aircraft piracy, and other unlawful interference to civil aviation operations.
( b ) Immediately upon direct or referred receipt of a threat of any of the incidents described in paragraph (a) of this section, each airport operator must— ( 1 ) Evaluate the threat in accordance with its security program;
( 2 ) Initiate appropriate action as specified in the Airport Emergency Plan under 14 CFR 139.325; and
( 3 ) Immediately notify TSA of acts, or suspected acts, of unlawful interference to civil aviation operations, including specific bomb threats to aircraft and airport facilities.
( c ) Airport operators required to have a security program under § 1542.103(c) but not subject to 14 CFR part 139, must develop emergency response procedures to incidents of threats identified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) To ensure that all parties know their responsibilities and that all procedures are current, at least once every 12 calendar months each airport operator must review the procedures required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section with all persons having responsibilities for such procedures.
§ 172.3 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to— ( 1 ) Each person who offers a hazardous material for transportation, and
( 2 ) Each carrier by air, highway, rail, or water who transports a hazardous material.
( b ) When a person, other than one of those provided for in paragraph (a) of this section, performs a packaging labeling or marking function required by this part, that person shall perform the function in accordance with this part.
[Amdt. 172-29, 41 FR 15996, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 172-32, 41 FR 38179, Sept. 9, 1976]
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 24312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10141]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9117]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Sargent: Portraits of Artists and Friends'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following Determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Sargent: Portraits of Artists and 
Friends,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about 
June 30, 2015, until on or about October 4, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and 
Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 
State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 20, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-10141 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```