alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 138 (Thursday, July 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 39622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notices

DATE and TIME: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-3546 Filed 7-17-07; 2:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-07-M
-----Original Message----- 

From: littlepi3@hotmail.com [mailto:littlepi3@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:58 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Cheri Riznyk 

5705 N Albina Ave 

Portland, OR 97217
§ 76.25-90 Installations contracted for prior to September 30, 1997. ( a ) Existing arrangements, materials, and facilities previously approved shall be considered satisfactory so long as they meet the minimum requirements of this paragraph, and they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and replacements may be made to the same standards as the original installation.
( b ) The details of the system must be in general agreement with NFPA 13 (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 76.01-2) insofar as is reasonable and practicable. Existing piping, pumping facilities, sprinkler heads, and operating devices may be retained provided a reasonable coverage of the spaces protected is assured.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51204, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65192, Oct. 31, 2008]
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0508(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0508(02)

**Commission communication concerning the prolongation of the Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 111 , 08/05/2002 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Commission communication concerning the prolongation of the Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development

(2002/C 111/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development(1) states in paragraph 9 that "the Commission will review the framework in five years' time. It may also decide to amend it at any time, in cooperation with the Member States, should it prove necessary for reasons connected with competition policy or to take account of other Community policies and international commitments".

In order to allow time to complete this review, the Commission decided, in February 2001, to continue to apply the current framework until such time as new rules on State aid for research and development are published, or, at the latest, until 30 June 2002, and published a communication to this effect(2). In this context, the Commission also invited any interested party to submit comments on the issues to be taken into consideration during this review.

Following further deliberations on the issue, and taking due account of all comments received, the Commission has now decided to continue to apply the current Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development until 31 December 2005.

(1) OJ C 45, 17.2.1996, p. 5. The framework was amended by the Commission communication amending the Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development (OJ C 48, 13.2.1998, p. 2).

(2) OJ C 78, 10.3.2001, p. 24.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending June 12, 2010

|Filer                   | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|F.S.B. PROPERTIES, INC. | CIC         | Notice submitted by Christopher Key Jordan and Crystal Lynn Jordan, both of Stigler, Oklahoma, as trustees of the Christopher Key Jordan 2008 Trust; and Kelly Dawn Jordan-Davis and Steven Scott Davis, both of Indianola, Oklahoma, as trustees of the Kelly Dawn Jordan-Davis 2008 Trust, to acquire control of F.S.B. Properties, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of Farmers State Bank, both in Quinton, Oklahoma. | Newspaper:06/28/2010Federal Register:06/15/2010
|Newspaper:              | 06/28/2010 
|Federal Register:       | 06/15/2010 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-1050

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM123AD

84-32-122 --- 8/28/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
EX-10.39



 Exhibit 10.39 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT 

THIS SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of November 20, 2012 in Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) by
and among: 
 Party A: E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign-owned company established and existing under the
laws of the PRC, with its address at 602-B, Building No.9, Shenzhen Software Park (II), No.1, Technology Middle Road, High-tech Middle Zone, Nanshan District, Shenzhen;; 
  

			
	Party B:	  	Wang Ying, a PRC citizen, with the ID number of 422801198308030625;
		  	  
 and

 
 Zhang Shijie, a PRC citizen, with the ID number of
659001197510133418;


 Party C: Shenzhen Guangtiandi Technology Co., Ltd., a limited liability company established and
existing under the laws of the PRC, with its address at Suite 2-A, Polyfunctional Building, Shenxianling Sports Center, Zhongxincheng, Longgang District, Shenzhen; 

(Party A, Party B and Party C, each a “Party”, collectively the “Parties”) 

WHEREAS: 
 The Parties entered
into that certain exclusive purchase right agreement (Original Agreement) dated June 1, 2011 and reached certain common understandings at the time of execution of such Original Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in order to formalize in writing such common understandings of the Parties, the Parties hereby reach the following written
agreement: 
 1. At the request of Party A, Party B or any of its designees shall unconditionally transfer in full any cash and assets
received by it from Party C (including without limitation dividends, bonuses and other rights and benefits distributed by Party C) to Party A in a form consistent with PRC laws, with the relevant taxes and charges to be borne by Party A. 







 2. This agreement shall be retroactive to June 1, 2011, the execution date of the Original
Agreement. 
 3. This agreement shall constitute a supplementary agreement to the Original Agreement and shall have the same legal force and
effect as the Original Agreement. 
 4. Issues not covered hereunder shall be governed by the Original Agreement. 

5. This agreement shall be made in four copies. Party A and Party C shall each hold one copy and Party B shall hold two copies. Each copy
shall have the same legal force and effect. 
 (NO OPERATIVE TEXT BELOW) 







 (SIGNATURE PAGE TO SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT) 

Party A: E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (seal) 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Geng Jin

	
	(Authorized Representative)
	
	Party B: Wang Ying
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Wang Ying

		
		 	Zhang Shijie
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zhang Shijie


 Party C: Shenzhen Guangtiandi Technology Co., Ltd. (seal) 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Yuan Liangdong


 Execution Date: November 20, 2012
Exhibit 32.1




                   CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of The American
Education Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey E. Butler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ Jeffrey E. Butler
     ---------------------
     Jeffrey E. Butler
     Chief Executive Officer

     August 14, 2006
98-2667.

#### Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.

Stark App. No. 1998CA00089. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed December 7,1998:

“On November 3,1998, appellants, the Canton City School Board of Education et al., filed a Motion to Certify Conflict. On November 19,1998, appellees, Regina Hubbard et al., filed a Motion for Leave to File a Response Instanter. The proposed Response was attached to the Motion. The Motion for Leave to File Instanter is granted, and we have considered appellees’ Response to the Motion to Certify Conflict. Upon review of both the Motion to Certify Conflict, the Response, and the cited cases, we find that the Opinion of this Court, filed October 26,1998, is in conflict with *Doe v. Jefferson Area Local School District*(1994), 97 Ohio App.3d 11 [646 N.E.2d 187], and *Zellerman v. Kenton Board of Education*(1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 287 [593 N.E.2d 392], We propose the following issue for certification: Is the exception to the political subdivision immunity found in R.C. 2744.02(B)(4), *1487effective 7/1/89, applicable only to negligence occurring in connection with the maintenance of school property or equipment, or to physical defects within or on the grounds of school property?”
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.32 Petitions, Etc.]
[Page 834]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.32  petitions, etc.

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII:

       23. The SPEAKER presented a petition of the New York City 
     Council, NY, relative to the Federal Bankruptcy Code; which 
     was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
From: allaxia@msn.com [mailto:allaxia@msn.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

stephanie DAVISON 

1237 N Ogden Dr 

WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90046
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Henry Deobold, *Deceased.*—

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to be charged upon the appellant personally.
#### § 1242.85 Fringe benefits (account 12-63-00).

Separate the common expenses in proportion to the total common salaries and wages expense separation (account 11-XX-XX) determined in §§ 1242.83 and 1242.84.
#### § 109.21 Remedies generally.

An Administrator may request the Attorney General to bring an action in the appropriate United States district court seeking temporary or permanent injunctive relief, punitive damages, assessment of civil penalties as provided by 49 U.S.C. 5122(a), and any other appropriate relief to enforce the Federal hazardous material transportation law, regulation, order, special permit, or approval prescribed or issued under the Federal hazardous material transportation law.
-----Original Message----- 

From: janiszen@drgyn.us [mailto:janiszen@drgyn.us] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Janis Enzenbacher 

105 Shad Row Suite 1b 

Piermont, NY 10968
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

NO. 22-0455

MICHAEL A. RUFF

v.

SUZANN RUFF

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

September 2, 2022

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, 

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

December 2, 2022

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above 

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify 

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case 

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under 

the date shown. 

It is further ordered that petitioner, MICHAEL A. RUFF, pay all costs incurred on this 

petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this 

the 2nd day of December, 2022.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,006
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,476
<PP&E>                                         196,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,289,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,382
<BONDS>                                        884,247
<COMMON>                                           447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     891,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,289,754
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               251,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   937
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,556)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,995)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1897 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1897

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to assure immigration 
  priority for unmarried sons and daughters of citizens of the United 
    States over unmarried sons and daughters of permanent residents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1995

  Ms. Lofgren (for herself and Mr. Moorhead) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to assure immigration 
  priority for unmarried sons and daughters of citizens of the United 
    States over unmarried sons and daughters of permanent residents.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSURING IMMIGRATION PRIORITY FOR UNMARRIED SONS AND 
              DAUGHTERS OF CITIZENS.

    (a) In General.--Section 202(e) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and paragraph (4)'' 
        after ``subsection (a)(4)'';
            (2) by striking ``, and'' at the end of paragraph (3) and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (3) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(4) the proportion of the visa numbers made available 
        under paragraphs (1) and (2)(B) of section 203(a) shall be 
        adjusted to the extent necessary to ensure that the priority 
        date for aliens described in section 203(a)(1) is no earlier 
        than the priority date for aliens described in section 
        203(a)(2)(B).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to visa numbers made available in months beginning more than 45 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 52001XC0404(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52001XC0404(03)

**Notice to importers of certain products originating in certain developing countries qualifying for generalised tariff preferences (rules of origin — replacement certificates of origin used between the Community, Norway and Switzerland) **

*
Official Journal C 104 , 04/04/2001 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Notice to importers of certain products originating in certain developing countries qualifying for generalised tariff preferences (rules of origin - replacement certificates of origin used between the Community, Norway and Switzerland)

(2001/C 104/05)

Importers of certain products originating in certain developing countries benefiting from generalised tariff preferences are advised that Article 67(4) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93(1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1602/2000(2), will apply from 1 April 2001.

From that date, products originating in certain countries qualifying for generalised tariff preferences that contain components originating in Norway or Switzerland (cumulation of origin) will be able to use the procedure laid down in Article 87 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93, as amended, which provides for replacement certificates of origin to simplify the transit of goods between the Community, Norway and Switzerland.

(1) OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 188, 26.7.2000, p. 1.
#### James S. Haviland and others, *Appellants, v.*William H. Schmohl, *Respondent, Impleaded, etc.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
#### Achille J. Oishei, Appellant, *v.*Pietrina D’Ancona, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Pietro D’Ancona, Defendant, and Borden’s Condensed Milk Company, Respondent.

*Oishei*v. *D'Ancona,*132 App. Div. 929, affirmed.

(Argued October 13, 1910;

decided October 28, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 5, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to enforce an attorney’s lien.

*Nelson L. Keaoh*and *Aohille J. Oishei*for appellant.

*Thomas M. Rowlette*and *F. Herbert Wadsworth*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.