alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 31, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS,  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE  INCOME  AND  STATEMENTS  OF CASH  FLOWS AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000829987
<NAME>                        Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         13,016
<SECURITIES>                                   30,206
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (500)
<INVENTORY>                                    22,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,742
<PP&E>                                         75,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (32,439)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38,752
<BONDS>                                        4,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       254
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,365
<SALES>                                        133,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,497
<CGS>                                          100,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,068
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .37
        


</TABLE>
*Friday, November 6, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

97-2342.

#### Wightman v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Erie App. No. E-97-001. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the court of Appeals for Erie County. Upon consideration of appellee/cross-appellant’s motion to extend time for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to extend time for oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 27, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1548.19 Security Directives and Information Circulars. ( a ) TSA may issue an Information Circular to notify indirect air carriers of security concerns.
( b ) When TSA determines that additional security measures are necessary to respond to a threat assessment, or to a specific threat against civil aviation, TSA issues a Security Directive setting forth mandatory measures. ( 1 ) Each indirect air carrier that is required to have an approved indirect air carrier security program must comply with each Security Directive that TSA issues to it, within the time prescribed in the Security Directive for compliance.
( 2 ) Each indirect air carrier that receives a Security Directive must comply with the following: ( i ) Within the time prescribed in the Security Directive, acknowledge in writing receipt of the Security Directive to TSA.
( ii ) Within the time prescribed in the Security Directive, specify the method by which the measures in the Security Directive have been implemented (or will be implemented, if the Security Directive is not yet effective).
( 3 ) In the event that the indirect air carrier is unable to implement the measures in the Security Directive, the indirect air carrier must submit proposed alternative measures and the basis for submitting the alternative measures to TSA for approval. ( i ) The indirect air carrier must submit the proposed alternative measures within the time prescribed in the Security Directive.
( ii ) The indirect air carrier must implement any alternative measures approved by TSA.
( 4 ) Each indirect air carrier that receives a Security Directive may comment on it by submitting data, views, or arguments in writing to TSA. ( i ) TSA may amend the Security Directive based on comments received.
( ii ) Submission of a comment does not delay the effective date of the Security Directive.
( 5 ) Each indirect air carrier that receives a Security Directive or Information Circular, and each person who receives information from a Security Directive or Information Circular, must: ( i ) Restrict the availability of the Security Directive or Information Circular, and information contained in either document, to those persons with a need-to-know.
( ii ) Refuse to release the Security Directive or Information Circular, and information contained in either document, to persons other than those with a need-to-know without the prior written consent of TSA.
[71 FR 30516, May 26, 2006]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending March 12, 2011

|Filer                                                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|WESTERN STATE AGENCY, INC., EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST | * 3A1         | Western State Agency, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Devils Lake, North Dakota, to become a bank holding company by acquiring over 25 percent of Western State Agency, Devils Lake, North Dakota and thereby indirectly acquire Western State Bank, Devils Lake, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/24/2011
|Newspaper:                                                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                                                   | 03/24/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from United
Investors Income Properties 1997 year-end 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000830056
<NAME> United Investors Income Properties
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          12,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,966
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,822
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.65<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.447 Storage incident to transportation—general requirements. The following requirements apply to temporary storage during the course of transportation but not to Nuclear Regulatory Commission or Agreement State-licensed facilities or U.S. Government-owned or contracted facilities. ( a ) The number of packages and overpacks bearing FISSILE labels stored in any one storage area, such as a transit area, terminal building, storeroom, waterfront pier, or assembly yard, must be limited so that the total sum of the criticality safety indices in any individual group of such packages and overpacks does not exceed 50. Groups of such packages and overpacks must be stored so as to maintain a spacing of at least 6 m (20 feet) from all other groups of such packages and overpacks.
( b ) Storage requirements for Class 7 (radioactive) material transported in vessels are described in subpart M of part 176 of this subchapter.
[Amdt. 173-244, 60 FR 50307, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended by 66 FR 45380, Aug. 28, 2001; 69 FR 3691, Jan. 26, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 07-06]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 07-06 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 35433)          ( print page 35434)          ( print page 35435)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-3165 Filed 6-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice of an intent to grant an exclusive license for U.S. Patent application 11/229,425, filed September 16, 2005 entitled “Artillery Rocket Trajectory Correction Kit” was originally published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 20, 2007 (72 FR 39801). The following information was published in error: “In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license within the geographic area of the United States of America and its territories and possessions to U.S. Patent application * * *.” The following information is the correction; In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7(b)(12)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license for all the geographic area excluding the United States of America and its territories and possessions for any patents or patent applications claiming priority to U.S. Patent application.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Russ Alexander, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 876-8743.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3673 Filed 7-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary Financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations
found on pages 3,4 and 5 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the year-to-date of each
period and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
information.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          29,376
<SECURITIES>                                    26,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,975
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,879
<PP&E>                                           5,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          205,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,142
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,018
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,363
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,902
<INCOME-TAX>                                       737
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,165
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
#### Weight Reed v. The State.

*No. 169.*

*Decided May 6.*

Theft—Indictment—Unknown Owner.—Where an indictment for theft charges the ownership in a person unknown to the grand jurors, it is not necessary to allege that such unknown person was other than the accused.

Appeal from the District Court of Newton. Tried below before Hon. Stephen P. West.

Appellant was indicted for theft of one head of cattle from the possession of a person to the grand jurors unknown, and was convicted at his trial, the punishment being affixed at two years in the penitentiary.

A statement of the facts not necessary.

No brief for appellant.

*R. L.*Henry, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

SIMKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary, from which he appeals to this court.

1. There is nothing in the motion to arrest. The indictment sufficiently charges the ownership in a person to the grand jurors unknown. It was not necessary to allege that such unknown person was other than appellant. Such a conclusion was a logical and necessary result of the other allegations.

2. The court did not err in refusing to give the special charges asked for. There was no evidence showing that appellant had claimed the steer before killing it, but on the contrary, it was known and recognized by appellant and his neighbors as an estray, and had been marked by *140appellant in the mark of its mother, and when asked about it, appellant-claimed that he had killed a steer of his own, of different description, and not the estray. There are no reversible errors. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.