alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
                             VLSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                 CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE - unaudited
                       (thousands except per share data)
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                   ------------------------
                                                   March 28,     March 29,
Primary Earnings per Share                           1997          1996
---------------------------                        ---------     ---------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>
Net income                                           $ 8,986       $ 3,170
                                                     =======       =======
Average number of common and common
  equivalent shares: 
    Average common shares outstanding                 46,497        45,702
    Dilutive options                                   1,685           703
                                                     -------        ------
Average number of common and
  common equivalent shares                            48,182        46,405
                                                     =======       =======
Earnings per common and common
  equivalent share                                   $   .19       $   .07
                                                     =======       =======

Fully Diluted Earnings per Share
----------------------------------
Net income                                             8,986       $ 3,170
Add interest expense on convertible
  debt, net of tax effect (1)                              -             -
                                                     -------       -------
Adjusted net income                                  $ 8,986       $ 3,170
                                                     =======       =======
Average number of common and common
  equivalent shares on a fully diluted basis
    Average common shares outstanding                 46,497        45,702
    Dilutive options                                   1,685           703
    Conversion of convertible debt (1)                     -             -
                                                     -------       -------
Average number of common and
  common equivalent shares on a fully
  diluted                                            $48,182       $46,405
                                                     =======       =======
Fully diluted earnings per common
  and common equivalent share                        $   .19       $   .07
                                                     =======       =======
-----------------------------------------------

(1) The convertible debt is not included in the calculation of fully diluted
    earnings per share for the quarters ended March 28, 1997 and March 29,   
    1996 since its inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect.
</TABLE>
#### § 1242.34 Administration (account XX-26-01).

Separate common expenses according to distribution of common expenses in the following accounts:

Repair and Maintenance (XX-26-41)

Machinery Repair (XX-26-40)

Equipment Damage (XX-26-48)

Dismantling Retired Property (XX-26-39)
Exhibit
32.2





HARLEYSVILLE
NATIONAL CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with the Harleysville
National Corporation (the "Corporation") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, George S. Rapp, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            To
      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the
      Report.











/s/ George S. Rapp


George S.
Rapp


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Harleysville
National Corporation





Date:
May  8, 2009














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Harleysville National Corporation and will
be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wilfred J. Corrigan, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of LSI Logic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of LSI Logic Corporation.

                                   By:  /s/ Wilfred J. Corrigan
                                      ------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Wilfred J. Corrigan
                                   Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.1    Page 1 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.2    Page 2 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.3    Page 3 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.4    Page 4 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.5    Page 5 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.6    Page 6 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.7    Page 7 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.8    Page 8 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.9    Page 9 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.10    Page 10 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.11    Page 11 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.12    Page 12 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.13    Page 13 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.14    Page 14 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.15    Page 15 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.16    Page 16 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.17    Page 17 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.18    Page 18 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.19    Page 19 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.20    Page 20 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.21    Page 21 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.22    Page 22 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.23    Page 23 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.24    Page 24 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.25    Page 25 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.26    Page 26 of 27

Case 2:15-cv-12548-SFC-DRG   ECF No. 1   filed 07/17/15    PageID.27    Page 27 of 27
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1772

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain interests in

the Waihee Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge

Complex.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain

interests in the Waihee Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu

National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS FOR IN4 CLUSION IN THE OAHU NATIONAL WILDLIFE

5 REFUGE COMPLEX.

6 (a) AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE.—The Secretary of the

7 Interior may acquire, for inclusion in the Oahu National

8 Wildlife Refuge Complex, the area known as the Waihee

9 Marsh, located on the northeast coast of the Island of
2

•HR 1772 IH

1 Oahu, Hawaii, consisting of approximately 30 acres (as

2 determined by the Secretary) along both sides of Kameha3 meha Highway.

4 (b) MANAGEMENT OF ACQUIRED INTERESTS.—

5 Lands and interests acquired by the United States under

6 this section shall be managed by the Secretary of the Inte7 rior as part of the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Com8 plex.

Æ
#### § 1540.207 [Reserved]
§ 176.13 Responsibility for compliance and training. ( a ) Unless this subchapter specifically provides that another person shall perform a particular duty, each carrier shall perform the duties specified and comply with all applicable requirements in this part and shall ensure its hazmat employees receive training in relation thereto.
( b ) A carrier may not transport a hazardous material by vessel unless each of its hazmat employees involved in that transportation is trained as required by subpart H of part 172 of this subchapter.
( c ) The record of training required by § 172.704(d) of this subchapter for a crewmember who is a hazmat employee subject to the training requirements of this subchapter must be kept on board the vessel while the crewmember is in service on board the vessel.
[Amdt. 176-31, 57 FR 20954, May 15, 1992, as amended by Amdt. 176-35, 59 FR 49134, Sept. 26, 1994]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED MAY 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,106
<INVENTORY>                                     66,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               334,458
<PP&E>                                       1,193,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                 344,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,549,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          365,088
<BONDS>                                        261,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           791
<OTHER-SE>                                     564,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,549,986
<SALES>                                      3,265,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,265,842
<CGS>                                        1,541,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,541,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,562
<INCOME-TAX>                                    85,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            127,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   127,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
        

</TABLE>
#### John Dunn, *Appellant, v.*Henry P. Journeay, *Respondent.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt:, J.
National Archives and Records Administration

Office a/the Federal Register

MA'l 1 1 2007

Ms. Nancy Molitor

Regulations Division (AGe-200)

Office of the Chief Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The matenallisled in the attachment is approved fOrlocorporalion by reference in 14 CFR Part 39.

This approval IS contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date of your

final rule. Ifyau wish to enforce some other edition of the pubhcation(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the

Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edition IS on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3. Notify me in writing of the change.

Sincerely,

'JtVt;vJ;" [N1/>0

f~YMONDA MOSLEY

Director of the Federal Register

Federal Register Attomey:cz;t:

Attachment

u.s. mail address: 8601 Adr.lphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001

Officc location: 800 North Capitol Stt~et, NW, Suitc 700, WaBhington, DC 20002-4244

Federal Registcr web sites: http:/ jwwv •...archives,gov j federal-register and http:/ jw·ww.gpoaccess.gov! nara
Incorporatioll by Reference

Docket No. FAA-2005-22288; Directorate Idemifier 2005-NM-132-AD; Amdr. 39-/5050; AD 2007-10-09

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin

747-53A2660

dated November 16. 2006

Docker No. FAA-2006-24696; DireClOrate Idemifier 2006-NM-038-AD; Amdt. 39-/5052; AD 2007-10-11

EMBRAER

EMBRAER

Service Bulletin 145-28-

0028

Service Bulletin

145LEG-28-0030

dated November 7. 2005

dated April 19, 2006

Docket No. FAA-2007-2 7531; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-020-AD; Amdt. 39-15054; AD 2007-10-13

Apex Aircraft

Prillted jj] li2007

Mandatory Service

Bulletin No. 040401

dated October 29, 2004

Page] of]
§ 1552.35 Presence in the United States. ( a ) A candidate may be eligible to participate in flight training if the candidate— ( 1 ) Is lawfully admitted to the United States, or entered the United States and has been granted permission to stay by the U.S. Government, or is otherwise authorized to be employed in the United States; and
( 2 ) Is within their period of authorized stay in the United States.
( b ) A candidate who has yet to obtain a valid document issued by the United States evidencing eligibility to take flight training may be issued a preliminary Determination of Eligibility pending the individual's ability to provide proof of eligibility.
( c ) A candidate who engages in a flight training event that takes place entirely outside the United States is not required to provide eligibility for flight training in the United States, but must provide any United States visas held by the candidate.
( d ) Any history of denial of a United States visa may be a factor in determining whether a candidate is eligible to participate in flight training, regardless of training location.
[Crim. No. 4016.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Oct. 9, 1946.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOHN D. WADE et al., Defendants; FRANK MARQUEZ GORDILLO, Appellant.

Abbott Bernay for Appellant.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, Frank Richards, Deputy Attorney General, Fred N. Howser, District Attorney, and Robert Wheeler, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

*431McCOMB, J.

Defendants were convicted after trial before a jury of burglary in the second degree. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction of defendant Gordillo and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondent (People), the facts are:

On April 20, 1945, the Track Cafe located in Pasadena, California, was burglarized. Admission to the cafe was obtained by the cutting of five-eighths inch thick bars on a rear window of the establishment. Property of a value in excess of $1,000 was taken. Included in the articles stolen was a check in the sum of $50 which defendant Gordillo subsequently cashed. After his arrest said defendant stated that he had received the check in a crap game. Later he stated that he did not get the check in a game; that he knew from whom he received it, but that he could not afford to tell. At the time that defendants were arrested there was found in their car a set of bolt cutters which it is conceded were used in the commission of the burglary.

On May 28, 1946, defendant Wade filed an opening brief in support of his appeal with this court. On July 10, 1946, defendant Gordillo filed a document whereby he adopted in his own behalf by reference the brief filed by his codefendant. On July 12, 1946, defendant Wade abandoned his appeal and requested that a remittitur issue immediately. An order pursuant to such request was made by this court July 15,1946.

The only point urged as a reason for reversing the judgment in defendant Wade’s brief which is applicable to his codefendant is the proposition that *there is not any substantial evidence to sustain the judgment finding defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree.*

This proposition is untenable. The law is established in California that possession of stolen property coupled with false statements as to the manner in which the property came into defendant’s possession is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction of burglary. *(People*v. McCann, 34 Cal.App.2d 376, 377 [93 P.2d 643].)

Applying the foregoing rule of law to the facts in the instant case there is substantial evidence to sustain defendant’s conviction of burglary since he possessed the check stolen at the time of the burglary and gave inconsistent and conflicting accounts of the manner in which it came into his *432possession. Also defendant was in possession of the instrument with which the window bars at the Track Cafe were cut.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment and order appealed from are and each is affirmed.

Moore, P. J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied November 4, 1946.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMIE PAUL TABIT, a/k/a Gonzo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-03-60)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie Paul Tabit, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Anna Mills Wagoner, United States

Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Paul Tabit seeks to appeal his conviction and

sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of

appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court may grant

an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of

excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United

States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). When the

notice of appeal is filed more than thirty days after expiration of

the appeal period, neither the district court nor this Court may

grant an extension. United States v. Schuchardt, 685 F.2d 901, 902

(4th Cir. 1982). The appeal periods established by Rule 4 are

mandatory and jurisdictional. Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978).

The district court entered its judgment on November 19,

2003, and its amended judgment on December 1, 2003. Tabit filed

his notice of appeal on June 23, 2004.* Because the notice of

appeal was filed beyond the excusable neglect period, we dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
- 3 -

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED