alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1122.4 Board-Initiated Investigations.

The Board may, in its discretion, commence a nonpublic Board-Initiated Investigation of any matter of national or regional significance that is subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IV, Part A, subject to the provisions of § 1122.6, by issuing an Order of Investigation. Orders of Investigation shall state the basis for the Board-Initiated Investigation and identify all Board staff who are authorized to conduct the investigation as Investigating Officer(s). The Board may add or remove Investigating Officer(s) during the course of a Board-Initiated Investigation. To the extent practicable, an Investigating Officer shall not participate in any decisionmaking functions in any Formal Board Proceeding(s) opened as a result of any Board-Initiated Investigation(s) that he or she conducted.
DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

98-2433.

#### Ohio Council 8, Am. Fedn. of State, Cty. & Mun. Emp., AFL-CIO v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

Summit App. No. 18829.
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.25-35 Refrigerated systems. ( a ) Where refrigerated systems are installed to maintain the temperature of the liquid below atmospheric, at least two complete refrigeration plants automatically regulated by pressure variations within the tanks shall be provided, each to be complete with the necessary auxiliaries for proper operation. The capacity of each refrigeration compressor shall be sufficient to maintain the vapor pressure in the tanks during the peak atmospheric temperature conditions below the pressure for which the tanks are designed.
( b ) An alternate arrangement may consist of three compressors, any two of which shall be capable of maintaining the vapor pressure in the tanks during peak atmospheric temperature conditions below the pressure for which the tanks are designed, the third compressor acting as a stand-by unit.
( c ) Refrigerated tanks shall be insulated in conformance with the requirements of § 98.25-30.
Exhibit 10.d



AMENDMENT TO THE

CHANGE IN CONTROL,

SEVERANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

FOR KENNETH T. NEILSON



This Amendment to the Change in Control, Severance and Employment Agreement for Kenneth T. Neilson (the Amendment), is made this 17th day of September, 2003, between Hudson United Bancorp and Hudson United Bank (collectively,
the Company), a New Jersey corporation which maintains its principal office at 1000 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey, and Kenneth T. Neilson (the Executive), and amends the Change in Control, Severance and Employment
Agreement for Kenneth T. Neilson, which was made effective as of January 1, 1997 (the Agreement).



WHEREAS, the Executive is presently an executive officer of the Company; and



WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to amend the Agreement as provided herein;



NOW, THEREFORE, for the good and valuable consideration set forth herein, and
the Executives continued employment with the Company, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:



1. Paragraph 9(d) of the Agreement, relating to Payments and Benefits, is amended by adding the following language after the end of the first
sentence thereof:



For purposes of the calculation of
the bonus amount component of the Lump Sum only, Paragraph 1(b)(ii)(B), regarding the Time of the Change of Control, will be disregarded.



2. The Company and the Executive agree that for purposes of Clause (ii) of Paragraph 9(d) of the Agreement, the annual incentive bonus paid to the
Executive for the 2002 fiscal year was $1,103,843.00, which is the amount shown in the Companys proxy statement for such year, and that the $512,502.00 incentive bonus paid to the Executive in January 2003 shall only be considered as having
been paid in fiscal year 2002.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized
representatives pursuant to the authority of its Board of Directors Compensation Committee, and the Executive has personally executed this Agreement, all as of the day and year first above written.



|ATTEST:                      |  |  |  | HUDSON UNITED BANCORP AND HUDSON UNITED BANK
|---------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|                             |  |  | 
|/s/ D.Lynn Van Borkulo-Nuzzo |  |  |  | By:                                         
|.D. Lynn Van Burkulo-Nuzzo   |  |  |  |                                             
|Corporate Secretary          |  |  |  | Chairman, Compensation Committtee           
|                             |  | 
|WITNESS:                     |  |  |  | EXECUTIVE                                   
|                             |  | 
|/s/ Victoria S. Freund       |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth T. Neilson                      
|Victoria S. Freund           |  |  |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,175
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          14,273
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     84,115
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          97,841
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            98,408
<LOANS>                                      1,035,790
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,273,859
<DEPOSITS>                                     936,321
<SHORT-TERM>                                    26,876
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,642
<LONG-TERM>                                    219,388
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,381
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,273,859
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,980
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,020
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,050
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,318
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,682
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,689
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,488
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,144
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 16,662
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,081
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      306
<RECOVERIES>                                        66
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,141
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,141
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Dennis G. Barber v. Abendroth Brothers.

Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted.
MIED (Rev. 04/09/06) Notice of Appeal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 

v.

Defendant(s).

/

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that appeals to

the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from the: Judgment Order

 Other: 

entered in this action on .

Date:

Counsel is:

Appellant: Please file this form with the District Court Clerk’s Office. If you are paying the filing fee, please make your

$505.00 check payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court.

United States of America

Waseem Alam

15-20351

Sean F. Cox

Mona K. Majzoub

Defendant Waseem Alam

✔

April 8, 2020

April 9, 2020

CJA

s/Michael R. Dezsi

P64530

Law Office of Michael R. Dezsi, PLLC

615 Griswold St., Suite 1410

Detroit, MI 48226

313-879-1206

mdezsi@dezsilaw.com

Judge

Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM ECF No. 335 filed 04/09/20 PageID.2596 Page 1 of 1
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 24, 1995 (72), Para 72.22 Leave of Absence]
[Page 815]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.72.22  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. HANSEN, for today and the balance of the week;
  To Mr. KLECZKA, for the week of May 22nd; and
  To Mr. McNULTY, from 2 p.m. today.
  And then,
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: February 11, 2011



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                           
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.                         
|Chief Executive Officer;
Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 4, 2014

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF THE OZARKS INC         | * 3A3          | Bank of the Ozarks, Inc., Little Rock, Arkansas, to acquire 100 percent of Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire OmniBank, N.A., Houston, Texas. | Newspaper:01/18/2014Federal Register:01/30/2014        
|Newspaper:                     | 01/18/2014    
|Federal Register:              | 01/30/2014    
|COMMERCE NATIONAL BANK         | Member         | Commerce National Bank, Corinth, Mississippi, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                             | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable
|FIRST NATIONAL BANKING COMPANY | Member         | First National Banking Company, Ash Flat, Arkansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                       | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1


[COOPERS & LYBRAND LETTERHEAD]                                    EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
D&N Financial Corporation
400 Quincy Street
Hancock, MI  49930

Gentlemen:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
D&N Financial Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated January 22, 1996 on
our audits of the financial statements of D&N Financial Corporation and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of D&N Financial Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1995.

Coopers & Lybrand

Detroit, Michigan
March 26, 1996

                                    -101-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828186
<NAME> 88A.TXT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         206,923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               360,630
<PP&E>                                      10,083,265
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,490,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,953,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,921,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,953,618
<SALES>                                      1,157,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,170,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,501,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (331,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (331,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (331,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (25.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lois A. Toth, Treasurer of Capital Directions, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)       The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
               2002 which this accompanies fully complies with the requirements
               of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

     (2)       The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
               the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
               of Capital Directions, Inc.



Date:  March 31, 2003                                   /s/  Lois A. Toth
       --------------                                   -----------------------
                                                        Lois A. Toth
                                                        Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Capital Directions, Inc. and will be retained by Capital Directions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report").

            I, Joseph Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

            (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

            (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Joseph Li
                                                  _____________________________

                                                  Joseph Li
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  March 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., and will be retained by Nam Tai
Electronics, Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS1302 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on May 2, 2013

JOHN McLAUGHLIN v. JOHN L. TWEEDALL, ET AL.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Campbell County

No. 14418 John D. McAfee, Judge

No. E2012-02744-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MAY 2, 2013

The final judgment from which the appellant seeks to appeal was entered on December 3,

2012. The only Notice of Appeal “filed” by the appellant on December 28, 2012, was

submitted to the trial court clerk via facsimile transmission in violation of Rule 5A.02(4)(e)

of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the Notice of Appeal was insufficient to invoke the

jurisdiction of this Court, this appeal is dismissed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., P.J., AND D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J.

Arthur F. Knight, III, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, John McLaughlin.

J. Stephen Hurst, LaFollette, Tennessee, for the appellees, Gary A. Bruewer and Lori

Bruewer.

Gary S. Dawson, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellees, John L. Tweedall and Leigh

Tweedall.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

1

By order entered on April 12, 2013, this Court directed the appellant to show cause

why this appeal should not be dismissed because the Notice of Appeal filed by facsimile

transmission was insufficient to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Rule 5A.02(4)(e) of the

Rules of Civil Procedure explicitly states that “[t]he following documents shall not be filed

in the trial court by facsimile transmission: . . . [a] notice of appeal.”

In response to this Court’s show cause order, counsel for the appellant does not

dispute that the only notice of appeal in this case was the one submitted to the trial court

clerk by facsimile transmission on December 28, 2012. Instead, counsel asks this Court to

“find cause” for allowing this appeal to go forward despite the error in the submission of the

Notice of Appeal. Counsel asserts that the appellees have filed no motion to dismiss based

upon the defect in the filing of the Notice of Appeal and “no party has suffered any prejudice

by the facsimile filing.” However, given the express language of Rule 5A.02(4)(e), we

cannot conclude that a Notice of Appeal was ever actually “filed” with the trial court clerk.

As such, our jurisdiction to consider this appeal was never timely invoked pursuant to Rule

4(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Davis v. Jackson Tenn. Hosp. Co., LLC, No.

W2009-02537-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 2812625, at * 3-4 (Tenn. Ct. App., July 16, 2010).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant,John

McLaughlin, for which execution may issue if necessary.

PER CURIAM

Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows: 1

ThisCourt, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may

affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum

opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When

a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated

“MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be

cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.

-2-