alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 25, 2010

|Filer                       | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FLORIDA CAPITAL GROUP, INC. | CIC         | After-the-fact change in control notice filed by Jan Malcolm Jones, Jr., and Leslie Ann Jones, Jacksonville, Florida, to retain 13 percent of the outstanding shares of Florida Capital Group, Inc., and its subsidiary bank, Florida Capital Bank, both of Jacksonville, Florida. | Newspaper:01/17/2011Federal Register:01/11/2011
|Newspaper:                  | 01/17/2011 
|Federal Register:           | 01/11/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 31.2



I, Paul D. Meyer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 2, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL D. MEYER                    
|Paul D. Meyer                        
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(491O-13-P)

NITIALSISIO

ROUTING SYMlIOL

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness direetive (AD) for the products list

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing aiIW1rthiness information (MCAI)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAJ describes tJe unsafe condition as:

It was reported that after commanding the landinl gear lever to

down the three green landing gear positioning in4ication was

displayed followed by the LG/LEVER DISAGREE ElCAS

[engine indicating and crew alerting system] mesbge. The crew

decided to continue the approach and landing pro6edure. As soon

as the crew identified that the landing gear was nbt extended

properly, a go-around procedure was successfull~ performed.

During maneuver, the airplane settled momentarily onto the flaps

and belly_

(DOT).

'I, 2.0;10

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod UTJl<OSYM80lj

;11-{01

N IAI.SISK;

EMB-135 and -145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR -145MP, and -145EP Airplane .-

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

RIN 2120-AA64

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0714; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-041-AD; Amendmen

\Ip~qo ti.O10-/0-11

39-*****j AD  -** -**]

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 39

* * * * * * *
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.12 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1026]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.12  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following substitute amendment submitted by Mr. 
HOUGHTON for the amendment submitted by Mr. FAZIO:
  Substitute amendment submitted by Mr. HOUGHTON:

       Page 23, line 18, strike ``$60,083,000'' and insert 
     ``$75,083,000''.
       Page 26, line 19, strike ``$211,664,000'' and insert 
     ``$195,076,000''.

  Amendment submitted by Mr. FAZIO:

       Page 19, after line 13, insert the following:

                    OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

                         Salaries and Expenses

       For salaries and expenses necessary to carry out the 
     provisions of the Technology Assessment Act of 1972 (Public 
     Law 92-484), including official reception and representation 
     expenses, expenses incurred in administering an employee 
     incentive awards program, and rental of space in the District 
     of Columbia, $18,620,000.

It was decided in the

Yeas

228

affirmative

Nays

201
```
EXHIBIT 23.1








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We have issued our report dated March 15, 2011 , relating to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of RBC Life Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 .  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of RBC Life Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109723 and File No. 333-139606.











/s/    Lane Gorman Trubitt, PLLCLANE GORMAN TRUBITT, PLLCDallas, TexasMarch 15, 2011
#### Shaw *v.*Abbott.

Claiming and exercising the right to open and close is not necessarily an assumption of the burden of proof.

Petition, to redeem land from a mortgage for $300, dated December 7, 1871. The plaintiff holds a mortgage on the premises dated May 30, 1872, for $500; and the defendant, besides his mortgage of December 7, 1871, holds another mortgage on the premises, dated January 25, 1873. All the mortgages were made by the plaintiff’s father. The defendant denies the right of the plaintiff to redeem the mortgage of December 7, 1871, without also redeeming the mortgage of January 25, 1873, and sets out in his answer a writing purporting to be signed by the plaintiff, agreeing, in consideration of a loan of $300 to his father, secured by the mortgage of January 25, 1873, to postpone his mortga'ge of May 30, 1872, and allow the mortgage of January 25, 1873, to take precedence. The.action being committed to a referee, to find, among *565other things, whether the plaintiff made the agreement to substitute mortgages, as set up in the defendant’s answer, both parties claimed the right to open and close. The referee, against the defendant’s objection, allowed the plaintiff to open and close. The plaintiff offered the report of a former referee and the pleadings in this cause, and rested. The defendant offered no evidence, and claimed that the referee must find that the plaintiff executed the agreement set out in the defendant’s answer, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary. The referee so held, and the plaintilf excepted.

*Norris*Hand, for the plaintiff.

*Albin,*for the defendant.

Clark, J.

The burden of proof was upon the defendant to show the due execution of the agreement set up in the answer. 1 Grcenl. Evid., *ss.*74-81. The case was not within the rule of court relating to the signature of instruments declared on. *Benedict*v. Swain, 43 N. H. 33. It was not a cause in equity heard on bill and answer, where the allegations of the answer must be taken to be true. *Rogers*v. Mitchell, 41 N. H. 154. Nor was the burden of proof changed by the fact that the plaintiff claimed and was allowed the right to open and close. Although the right to open and close may be determined by the burden of proof *(Judge of Probate*v. Stone, 44 N. H. 593), and has sometimes been allowed on condition of assuming it *(Schoff*v. Laithe, 58 N. H. 503), the exercise of the right to open and close is not necessarily an assumption of the burden of proof. The holding of the referee, that he must find that the plaintiff executed the agreement set forth in the defendant’s answer, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, was erroneous.

*Report recommitted.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
29–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 112–700 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO 

SUSPEND THE RULES 

DECEMBER 11, 2012.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 827] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 827, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that it shall be in order on any day 

through the legislative day of December 28, 2012, not previously 

authorized under clause 1 of rule XV, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules, as though under clause 

1(c) of rule XV. Clause 1 of rule XV authorizes motions to suspend 

the rules on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays, and during the 

last six days of a session of Congress. 

The resolution further provides that the Speaker or his designee 

shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration under suspension of the 

rules pursuant to the resolution. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
GROUP  INCORPORATED  QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER
28,  1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-26-1996
<CASH>                                  3,246
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          12,427
<ALLOWANCES>                              521
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       25,502
<PP&E>                                 11,560
<DEPRECIATION>                          2,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         77,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   7,433
<BONDS>                                 1,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   12
<OTHER-SE>                             66,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           77,819
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       48,961
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          36,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        7,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         5,367
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,869
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.03
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1114.1 Admissibility.

Any evidence which is sufficiently reliable and probative to support a decision under the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, or which would be admissible under the general statutes of the United States, or under the rules of evidence governing proceedings in matters not involving trial by jury in the courts of the United States, will be admissible in hearings before the Board. The rules of evidence will be applied in any proceeding to the end that necessary and proper evidence will be conveniently, inexpensively, and speedily produced, while preserving the substantial rights of the parties.

[47 FR 49562, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52713, Oct. 8, 1996]
#### Eliza J. Beaudet et al., Appellants, *v.*Emma L. Jacob, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

*Beaudet*v. *Jacob,*129 App. Div. 904, affirmed.

(Argued May 19, 1910;

decided June *7,*1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 18, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to have a certain deed of real property declared void and for a reconveyance and an accounting of profits.

*Gilbert W. Minor*for appellants.

*Arthxtr S. Hamlin*and *Graham Sumner*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          36,066
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    271,120
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,868
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           285,262
<LOANS>                                      1,213,256
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,560,571
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,239,508
<SHORT-TERM>                                   178,644
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,553
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,560,571
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                103,196
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,184
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               122,380
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              51,936
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,080
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           60,364
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,314
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 380
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,720
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      27,720
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.90
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,672
<LOANS-PAST>                                       304
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,054
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,878
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,717
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,207
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,207
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 10.9



April 12, 1996



Mr. Thomas Blades
c/o NUMAR Corporation
Houston, TX

Dear Tom:

I am pleased to inform you that effective April 11, 1996 you have been granted
the option to purchase 90,000 Common Shares of the Company under the Company's
Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $13.5625, which was the market
value on the day you joined the Company.

Under the Plan, the Company may grant either incentive stock options or non-
qualified stock options. The options granted to you are considered to be
incentive stock options.

These options will become exercisable as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
           Date First Exercisable           No. of Shares
           ----------------------           -------------
           <S>                              <C>   
            April 11, 1998                      36,000
            April 11, 1999                      18,000
            April 11, 2000                      18,000
            April 11, 2001                      18,000 
</TABLE>

Once options become exercisable, they will remain so until they are exercised or
until they terminate. Unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of the
Plan, all options granted hereby shall terminate on April 11, 2006.

The exercise price for your options is payable in cash.  Further terms governing
the options granted to you are set forth in the Stock Incentive Plan, a copy of
which is attached.
<PAGE>
 
April 12, 1996
Page 2


The shares subject to your options have not yet been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933. The Company intends to cause such shares to be so
registered by the time your options become exercisable, but unless they have
been so registered by the time of exercise, they must be acquired by you for
investment and not with a view to the public resale or distribution thereof.

If you wish to accept the grant of the options as provided above and in the
Plan, please so indicate by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this
letter, whereupon you and the Company shall be legally bound hereby under
Pennsylvania law.

Very truly yours,



Melvin N. Miller
President & CEO



Accepted and agreed:


-----------------------------
Thomas Blades          [date]
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 07-1113

ERNEY TOBON-MARIN, ET AL.,

Petitioners,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued January 8, 2008, should be

amended as follows:

On page 5, line 14, "prosecutors" should be "persecutors."