alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1889 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1889

  To encourage organ donation by enclosing information in income tax 
                         refund check mailings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1995

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Camp) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To encourage organ donation by enclosing information in income tax 
                         refund check mailings.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Organ Donation Insert Card Act''.

SEC. 2. ORGAN DONATION INFORMATION INCLUDED WITH INCOME TAX REFUND 
              PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall include with 
any payment of a refund of individual income tax made during the period 
beginning on February 1, 1996, and ending on June 30, 1996, a copy of 
the document described in subsection (b).
    (b) Text of Document.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall, after 
consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 
organizations promoting organ donation, prepare a document suitable for 
inclusion with individual income tax refund payments which--
            (1) encourages organ donation;
            (2) includes a detachable organ donor card; and
            (3) urges recipients to--
                    (A) sign the organ donor card;
                    (B) discuss organ donation with family members and 
                tell family members about the recipient's desire to be 
                an organ donor if the occasion arises; and
                    (C) encourage family members to request or 
                authorize organ donation if the occasion arises.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.18 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 651]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.18  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. COBLE, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill, the Clerk be 
authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, cross references, 
and to make other technical corrections.
```
§ 1220.3 Preservation of records. ( a ) All records may be preserved by any technology that is immune to alteration, modification, or erasure of the underlying data and will enable production of an accurate and unaltered paper copy.
( b ) Records not originally preserved on hard copy shall be accompanied by a statement executed by a person having personal knowledge of the facts indicating the type of data included within the records. One comprehensive statement may be executed in lieu of individual statements for multiple records if the type of data included in the multiple records is common to all such records. The records shall be indexed and retained in such a manner as will render them readily accessible. The company shall have facilities available to locate, identify and produce legible paper copies of the records.
( c ) Any significant characteristic, feature or other attribute that a particular medium will not preserve shall be clearly indicated at the beginning of the applicable records as appropriate.
( d ) The printed side of forms, such as instructions, need not be preserved for each record as long as the printed matter is common to all such forms and an identified specimen of the form is maintained on the medium for reference.
[50 FR 10775, Mar. 18, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 30874, July 8, 1991]
§ 97.05-5 Charts and nautical publications. As appropriate for the intended voyage, all vessels except barges, vessels operating exclusively on rivers, and motorboats other than those certificated for ocean or coastwise route, must carry adequate and up-to-date— ( a ) Charts;
( b ) Sailing directions;
( c ) Coast pilots;
( d ) Light lists;
( e ) Notices to mariners;
( f ) Tide tables;
( g ) Current tables; and
( h ) All other nautical publications necessary.[1]
[CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977] Footnotes -
97.05-5
[1] For United States vessels in or on the navigable waters of the United States, see 33 CFR 164.33.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment is made June 25, 1997, to the Employment Agreement dated April 1,
1997 (`the Agreement''), by and between Moto Photo, Inc. (``Employer'') and
Michael F. Adler (`Employee'').  This Amendment is made to correct an error in
the Agreement and to make another change to which the parties have agreed.

The parties agree as follows:

     1.Section 6 of the Agreement shall be amended by the addition of
       the following as its last sentence:

       During the term of this Agreement, Employer shall purchase and
       maintain on the life of Employee a 10-year term life insurance
       policy in the amount of $500,000, with the beneficiary to be
       designated by Employee.

     2.Section 8 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:

        8.     Automobile.  Employer shall furnish Employee with the use
        of an automobile or an automobile allowance of $1,250.00 per
        month during the term of this contact, subject to company
        policy.

     3.This Amendment shall be effective as of April 1, 1997.

     4.Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is affirmed.


                              EMPLOYER:  MOTO PHOTO, INC.


                              By   /s/ Frank W. Benson
                                  Frank W. Benson, Chairman of the
                                  Compensation Committee of the
                                  Board of Directors of Moto Photo, Inc.





                              EMPLOYEE:  MICHAEL F. ADLER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D)] and 5 CFR part 1320, Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements, the National Park Service (NPS) invites public comments on a revision of a currently approved collection of information (OMB # 1024-0236). The 30-Day                         **Federal Register**                         Notice for this collection of information that was published on June 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 122, Pages 35065-35066), was published in error and should be recognized as an incorrect version. The correct publication of the 30-Day                         **Federal Register**                         Notice for this collection of information was published on June 25, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 121, Pages 34722-34723), and should be recognized as the correct version. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Leonard E. Stowe, NPS, Information Collection Clearance Officer, 1849 C St., NW. (2605), Washington, DC 20240; or via e-mail at                         *leonard_stowe@nps.gov.*

Dated: July 9, 2007.

Leonard E. Stowe,

NPS, Information Collection Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3448 Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.30-37 Firefighting requirements. No person may lift a portable tank on or off a vessel, or transfer a product with a flashpoint of less than 300 °F to or from a portable tank or IBC unless— ( a ) Water pressure is maintained on the firemain;
( b ) Firehoses, fitted with a Coast Guard-approved combination nozzle, are attached to each fire hydrant in the vicinity of the portable tanks;
( c ) Except as provided in § 98.30-39, fire extinguishers of a dry chemical type are— ( 1 ) Located to protect the deck area 10 feet in any horizontal direction from each portable tank and its associated cargo handling system;
( 2 ) Coast Guard approved; and
( 3 ) Capable of covering the deck area without being moved;
( d ) In a deck area of 500 square feet or less, there are two or more dry chemical fire extinguishers of 300 pounds or more total capacity of extinguishing agent; and
( e ) In a deck area of more than 500 square feet, there are three or more dry chemical fire extinguishers of 450 pounds or more total capacity of extinguishing agent.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 15, 2013

----

Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to implement the Report of Selected Money Market Rates (FR 2420) and to extend with revision the Capital Assessments and Stress Testing information collection (FR Y-14A/Q/M).            -Proposed, June 14, 2013            Personnel            Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems -- appointment of Andre Anderson as acting deputy director, effective September 1, 2013.            -Approved, May 29, 2013            (A/C)          Enforcement            Northwestern Bancorp, Traverse City, Michigan -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, June 11, 2013                        Saehan Bancorp, Los Angeles, California -- written agreement dated January 22, 2010, terminated June 5, 2013.            -Announced, June 11, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1712

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States with respect

to imports of civil aircraft.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia (for himself and Mr. KINGSTON) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States with respect to imports of civil aircraft.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That General Note 6 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

4 of the United States is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘6. Articles Eligible for Duty-Free Treatment Pursuant

6 to the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.

7 ‘‘(a) Whenever a product is entered under a provi8 sion for which the rate of duty ‘Free (C)’ ap9 pears in the ‘Special’ subcolumn, the im10 porter—
2

•HR 1712 IH

1 ‘‘(i) shall maintain such supporting documenta2 tion as the Secretary of the Treasury may

3 require; and

4 ‘‘(ii) shall be deemed to certify that the im5 ported article is a civil aircraft, or has

6 been imported for use in civil aircraft and

7 will be so used.

8 The importer may amend the entry or file a written

9 statement to claim a free rate of duty under

10 this note at any time before the liquidation of

11 the entry becomes final.

12 ‘‘(b) For purposes of the tariff schedule, the term

13 ‘civil aircraft’ means—

14 ‘‘(i) any aircraft—

15 ‘‘(A) that is manufactured or operated

16 pursuant to any certificate issued by

17 the Administrator of the FAA under

18 section 44704 of title 49, United

19 States Code, or pursuant to the ap20 proval of the airworthiness authority

21 in the country of exportation, if such

22 approval is recognized by the FAA as

23 an acceptable substitute for such an

24 FAA certificate, or
3

•HR 1712 IH

1 ‘‘(B) for which an application for such a

2 certificate has been submitted to, and

3 accepted by, the Administrator of the

4 FAA, and

5 ‘‘(ii) any aircraft not described in clause (i),

6 other than aircraft purchased for use by

7 the Department of Defense or the United

8 States Coast Guard.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMIAN STEPLIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00264-LMB-4)

Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damian Steplight, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damian Steplight appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Steplight, No. 1:01-cr-00264-LMB-4 (E.D. Va. July 3, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 21, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ABINGTON BK, ABINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS | 117672 | 08/26/2013 | 12/08/2013     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Gray *v.*Gray & *a.*

Upon a hearing on a petition for the probate of a will in common form, the appearance of counsel for the heirs, and the cross-examination by them of the witnesses to the will, will not ordinarily have the effect to waive the probate in solemn form.

Appeal from a decree of the judge of probate, ordering the probate, in solemn form, of the will of George Gray, deceased. Facts found by a referee.

The appellant was the wife of George Gray, deceased, and, December 25, 1877, she was appointed administratrix on his estate, and *29took upon herself that trust. Subsequentty, at the instance of one of the heirs, she was cited to settle her account as administratrix, June 24, 1879. She appeared, and at that time filed a petition to prove a lost will of the deceased in common form. This fact becoming known to the counsel for the heirs, he appeared and cross-examined the witnesses, and asked and obtained a postponement of the hearing. At the time to which the hearing was adjourned, the counsel for the heirs appeared, and stated that he did not then desire to contest the matter further, but wished to have the will proved in solemn form at some other time. No notice of probate in common form was given to the heirs.

The other facts, material, appear in the opinion.

*Atherton,*for the appellant.

*Fassett,*for the appellees.

Stanley, J.

The question is, whether the probate court was right in decreeing probate of the will in solemn form. The appellant claims that, although her petition was fijtjprobate in common form, and was without notice to the heirs, WwtfSem the fact that the heirs were represented by counsel at ‘fiiffPBBflmfe’ on that petition, who examined the witnesses, the notice to’^qjlieirs requrbd by the statute was unnecessary, and the probate was, in legal effect, in solemn form.

Probate of a will in solemn form is made after all interests may be affected have been duly notified and| tunity to be heard. *Noyes v. Barber,*4 N. H. 406; SOI. The statute requires notice to the executor,! and by publication to all persons interested. G-. L.. _

K¡ M report appears the appellant, having been cited to settle her account a^adininistratrix, appeared and presented a petition for the probate, in common form, of the will of her deceased husband. Unless the requirements of the statute were waived by the heirs, there was not a probate in solemn form. On the question of waiver, the referee finds that none of the heirs were present or had any knowledge of any proceedings to prove the will of the deceased. They had not employed or instructed counsel in regard to a lost will. The fact that the hearing was postponed at the request of counsel, taken in connection with the other fact that at the adjourned hearing the appellant was notified that the heirs wished the will proved in solemn form, shows that they did not intend to waive the notice required by the statute, and the further fact that the judge of probate decreed that the will should be proved in solemn form also shows that he did not understand that there was any waiver of a compliance with the statute.

*Appeal dismissed.*
§ 78.47-33 Emergency lights. ( a ) All emergency lights shall be marked with a letter “E” at least 1 ⁄ 2 inch high.
( b ) [Reserved]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20627 Summary Calendar

LEONARD R. CROOMS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CV-1125

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leonard R. Crooms, Texas prisoner # 352784, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 1361 petition for a writ of mandamus. His notice of appeal was filed on June 17, 2003. Crooms did not obtain permission from a judge of this court before filing his appeal, as he is required to do pursuant to this court’s order in Crooms v. Cockrell , No. 01-21003 (5th Cir. March 28, 2002). The instant appeal is therefore DISMISSED as improvidently filed.No. 03-20627 -2- APPEAL DISMISSED.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-926 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 

Regional Housing Projects 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the COUNCIL OF EUROPE 

DEVELOPMENT BANK 

Signed at Washington and Paris 

September 24 and 26, 2012 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
COUNCIL OF EUROPE 

DEVELOPMENT BANK 

Foreign Assistance: Regional Housing Projects 

 Agreement signed at Washington and Paris 

 September 24 and 26, 2012; 

 Entered into force September 26, 2012. 

 With annexes.
EX-4.44



 Exhibit 4.44 
  

			
	From:	  	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
		  	(Registration No. 1950/038232/06)
		  	Block 27
		  	Randfontein Office Park
		  	Cnr Main Reef Road & Ward Avenue
		  	Randfontein
		  	(the “Lender”)
		
	To:	  	Business Venture Investments No. 1687 Proprietary Limited
		  	(Registration No. 2012/030646/07)
		  	Block A, Boston House
		  	3A De-La-Rey Road
		  	Rivonia
		  	2128
		  	(the “Borrower” and together with the Lender, the “Parties”)

 10 May 2013 
 Dear
Sirs 
 Term loan facility agreement entered into between the Borrower (as borrower) and the Lender (as lender) on or about 20 March 2013 in
terms of which the Lender agreed to advance a loan to the Borrower, all on the terms and conditions contained therein (the “Facility Agreement”) 
  

	1.	Reference is made to the Facility Agreement. Save as defined herein, terms defined in the Facility Agreement (whether directly or by way of incorporation by reference) shall bear the meanings ascribed thereto therein
when used in this letter (this “Extension Letter”). 

  

	2.	The Lender hereby agrees that the date referred to in clause 3.4 of the Facility Agreement is extended to 14 June 2013 (or such later date as may be agreed by the Lender). 


 

	3.	Save as expressly contemplated in this Extension Letter, the Facility Agreement shall remain unamended and, subject to its terms, of full force and effect. 


 

	4.	This Extension Letter comprises a written amendment to the Facility Agreement within the contemplation of clause 28.5.1 thereof and constitutes the whole agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter
hereof. 

  

	5.	This Extension Letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. 








 As witnessed by the duly authorised representatives of the parties hereto 

Signed for and on behalf of: 
  

	
	 /s/

	
	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
	
	Name:
	Title:
	Date:
	Witness: