alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND FROM THE  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE
THREE  MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         217,969
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  355,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                   463
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                         11,104,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0 <F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,176,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                        8,483,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,889,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,176,091
<SALES>                                        2,533,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,548,042
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,368,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             466,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (286,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (286,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (286,843)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE THE VALUE IS
$0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 1150.45 Procedures and relevant dates—transactions under section 10902 that involve creation of Class I or Class II rail carriers. ( a ) To qualify for this exemption, applicant must serve a notice of intent to file a notice of exemption no later than 14 days before the notice of exemption is filed with the Board, and applicant must comply with the notice requirement of § 1150.42(e).
( b ) The notice of intent must contain all the information required in § 1150.43 plus: ( 1 ) A general statement of service intentions; and
( 2 ) A general statement of labor impacts.
( c ) The notice of intent must be served on: ( 1 ) The Governor of each state in which track is to be sold;
( 2 ) The state(s) Department of Transportation or equivalent agency;
( 3 ) The national offices of the labor unions with employees on the affected line(s); and
( 4 ) Shippers representing at least 50 percent of the volume of local traffic and traffic originating or terminating on the line(s) in the most recent 12 months for which data are available (beginning with the largest shipper and working down).
( d ) Applicant must also file a verified notice of exemption conforming to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section and of § 1150.44, and certify compliance with paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, attaching a copy of the notice of intent.
( e ) The exemption will be effective 45 days after the notice is filed. The Board, through the Director of the Office of Proceedings, will publish a notice in the Federal Register within 16 days of the filing.
( f ) If the notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void *ab initio.* A petition to revoke under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) does not automatically stay the transaction. Stay petitions must be filed at least 14 days before the exemption becomes effective. Replies will be due 7 days thereafter. To be considered, stay petitions must be timely served on the applicant.
( g ) Applicant must preserve intact all sites and structures more than 50 years old until compliance with the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, is achieved.
[61 FR 32355, June 24, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 47584, Sept. 10, 1997; 71 FR 62213, Oct. 24, 2006; 84 FR 12945, Apr. 3, 2019]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending September 27, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129928 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, KRISTIN BELOTE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 129928 COA: 262591 Oakland CC: 2004-057964-NI KEITH STRANGE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

d0510 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 17, 2006

Clerk
#### The First National Bank of Montrose, *Respondent v.*William B. Harwood, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order reversed, without costs, on appellant stipulating not to sue for false imprisonment. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
ALEX JEAN-GILLES,

Appellant,

v.

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1040

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Virginia Norton, Judge.

Eric C. Roberson of Eric C. Roberson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Susan B. Morrison and Lauren E. Wages of Law Office of Daniel C. Consuegra, 

P.L., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                             CAPITAL RE CORPORATION


Capital Reinsurance Company, a Maryland domiciled insurance company;

Capital Credit Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company;

Capital Mortgage Reinsurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company;

Capital Title Reinsurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company;

KRE Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company

Capital Re Management Corporation, a New York reinsurance intermediary

Capital Re LLC, a Turks and Caicos limited life company;

Capital Re (UK) Holdings

CRC Capital, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of England

RGB Holdings, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of England

RGB Underwriting Services, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
England

RGB Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
England

C.I. de Rougemont Group Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
England

C.I. de Rougemont & Co. Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
England

ACE Capital Re Managers Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled managing general agency

ACE Capital Re Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company

Lenders Residential Asset Company LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company

Capital Risk Assurance Company, a Maryland domiciled insurance company

Capital Re Financial Products, a New York business corporation
Dear Sir or Madam,

Stephenson Construction Management, LLC is petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration to amend 

Exemption No. 11536 to Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0401 to add the following aircraft:

Zeta Science Buffalo FX-79

This aircraft is a fixed wing, single electric motor and propeller, small UAS designed for image data 

collection.

Ross L. Stephenson, Jr.

Stephenson Construction Management, LLC

Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending July 27, 2013

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CAPITAL BANK OF KENTUCKY, THE | * Branch       | The First Capital Bank of Kentucky, Louisville, Kentucky, to establish a branch facility to be located at 9819 Brownsboro Road, Louisville, Kentucky. | Newspaper:08/26/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 08/26/2013    
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable
|SOUTHERN BANK                       | * 18C* Branch  | Southern Bank, Poplar Bluff, Missouri, to merge with Bank of Thayer, Thayer, Missouri, and to retain the acquired facilities as branch offices.       | Newspaper:08/17/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 08/17/2013    
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                 | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF CAVE CITY, CAVE CITY, ARKANSAS | 629148  | 04/08/2013 | 07/09/2013     | S         | Small Bank 
|CAPITAL BK, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS      | 2594240 | 04/01/2013 | 07/09/2013     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 134922 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 134922 COA: 269919 Ingham CC: 05-000749-FC MONTREAL DARNELL CHRISTIAN-BATES, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of App eals for reconsideration. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall add ress whether the trial judge’s admitted error in cutting off defense counsel’s closing argument was harm less, taking into consideration that the defendant admitted shooting at the victim, the only ques tion for the ju ry was the defendant’s intent, and the defendant was convi cted of the lesser offen se of assault with intent to do great bodily harm.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

C AVANAGH , J., would deny leave to appeal.

d0108 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 11, 2008

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 110

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 110.60 Cost sharing.

The recipient must provide 20 percent of the direct and indirect costs of all activities approved in the grant agreement with non-Federal funds.

[84 FR 4000, Feb. 14, 2019]
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Martha Potter, Deceased. Frederick Potter, as Executor and Trustee, et al., Appellants; The Comptroller of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Potter,*139 App. Div. 905, affirmed.

(Argued September 27, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 24, 1910, which affirmed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax upon the estate of Martha Potter, deceased.

*George N. Whittlesey*and *Stanley*IF. *Dexter*for appellants.

*George M. Judd*and *Edward 11. Fallows*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ,
ACE-9.30.2013-Ex 10.1






Exhibit 10.1
ACE Limited
Outside Directors Compensation Parameters
August 2013


		
	•
	Annual Retainer Fee of $260,000. Paid $160,000 in restricted stock and $100,000 cash or, at the election of the director, $260,000 in restricted stock. Includes expectation of service on up to two committees (not counting service on Executive Committee). No fees are payable for regular board or committee meetings.




		
	•
	Annual premiums for committee chairs and lead director:




      —       Audit–$25,000        
      —       Compensation–$20,000    
      —       Risk & Finance–$15,000
      —       Nominating & Governance–$12,000        
      —       Lead director–$50,000


		
	•
	Annual premiums for selected committee service (non-chair):  None.




		
	•
	Committee chair and lead director service premiums are payable in cash quarterly or, at the election of the director, in restricted stock annually.




		
	•
	Meeting fees for “special” meetings (required to consider transactions or other special circumstances, as determined jointly by the Lead Director and Chairman): $2,000 per telephone meeting, $3,000 for ‘in person’ meetings.  Payable in cash quarterly.




		
	•
	Restricted stock will be awarded at beginning of the plan year (i.e. the date of the Annual General Meeting) and become non-forfeitable at end of the plan year, provided that the grantee has remained an ACE director continuously during that plan year.  Increases shall be paid on a pro-rated basis, based on date of award.




		
	•
	Equity ownership maintenance for outside directors:




		
	•
	Minimum equity ownership:  $400,000.


		
	•
	Each Outside Director has until the fifth anniversary of his or her initial election to the Board of Directors to achieve this minimum.


		
	•
	Previously granted restricted stock units (whether or not vested) and restricted stock (whether or not vested) shall be counted toward achieving this minimum.


		
	•
	Stock options shall not be counted toward achieving this minimum.


		
	•
	Once a given Outside Director has achieved the $400,000 minimum equity ownership, such requirement shall remain satisfied going forward as long as he or she retains the number of shares valued at $400,000 based on the NYSE closing price for the Company’s Common Shares as of the date such minimum threshold is initially met.


		
	•
	Any vested shares held by an Outside Director in excess of the minimum share equivalent specified above may be sold at such Outside Director’s discretion.


		
	•
	Shares may be sold after consultation with General Counsel.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Rooney, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Daniel RooneyDaniel
      RooneyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer ofSCI
      Engineered Materials, Inc.February
      17, 2010
Exhibit 10.11

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN FOR CERTAIN MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES

To attract, motivate, reward and retain management employees, and to align their
interests with those of the Company's stockholders the Company established the
Annual Incentive Plan ("AIP") to provide additional cash compensation to
designated executives of the Company based on the achievement of objective
performance targets.


Threshold, Target and Exceptional Performance benchmarks are approved by the
Compensation Committee for each Performance Period in terms of Return on Assets
("ROA"), Plant Contribution, or other criteria as determined.


Participants are limited to the CEO and those other executives who, because of
their significant impact on the current and future success of the Company, the
CEO recommends and the Committee approves for participation in the AIP for that
Performance Period.


Participants have an opportunity to earn an award based on the actual results of
the Operating Unit and/or Company compared with the Performance Target. Each
participant is assigned a certain multiple of base salary as the target
opportunity, based on level of responsibility. In addition, each participant is
assigned factors weighting Operating Unit and Company performance in the
calculation of the award. The award for achievement of Threshold performance is
50% of the Target award. The award for achievement of Exceptional performance is
150% of the Target award. Results below the Threshold benchmark earn no award.


To be eligible to receive an Award for any Performance Period a Participant must
be actively employed by the Company on the last day of the Performance Period.
Earned awards are paid in a single lump sum after actual results are finalized.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 21, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2011 (July 1, 2011 - September 30, 2011)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
###### Editorial Note on Part 8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 8.200 Purpose.

This subpart establishes criteria and procedures for vessel classification societies to obtain recognition from the Coast Guard. This recognition is necessary in order for a classification society to become authorized to perform vessel inspection and certification functions delegated by the Coast Guard as described in this part.