Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices 39803 

of MCBQ to accommodate 

approximately 3,000 personnel directed 

to MCBQ by the 2005 BRAC law, and 

potential development within the 

Westside to accommodate up to 2,000 

additional personnel, or 5,000 personnel 

total including BRAC, to support other 

Marine Corps requirements. 

DATES: The public comment period for 

the DEIS will end 45 days after 

publication of an NOA in the Federal 

Register by the Environmental 

Protection Agency. All comments must 

be received by 4 September 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Please send written 

comments on the DEIS to: Jeff Gardner, 

NREA Branch (B046), 3250 Catlin 

Avenue, Marine Corps Base, Quantico, 

VA 22134–0855. E-mail comments 

should be sent to jeff.gardner@usmc.mil. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Jeff Gardner 703–432–6784 during 

normal business hours Monday through 

Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Marine Corp Base Quantico, Virginia 

proposes development of the Westside 

of MCBQ, including the 2005 Base 

Realignment and Closure (BRAC) action 

at MCBQ. The development would 

entail construction of new facilities in 

two undeveloped areas west of 

Interstate 95. These areas, the Russell 

Road Area and the MCB–1 Area, would 

co-locate Military Department 

Investigative Agency Headquarters with 

the Counterintelligence Field Activity 

and Defense Security Service at MCBQ 

as directed by the 2005 BRAC law. The 

areas would also provide adequate 

space for facilities to support Marine 

Corps units currently at MCBQ, as well 

as potentially other federal and Marine 

Corps initiatives that may identify 

MCBQ as a site for relocation. 

This DEIS identifies and evaluates the 

potential environmental impacts of (1) 

Alternative A (BRAC Action), the 

relocation of approximately 3,000 

personnel directed to MCBQ by the 

BRAC Law; (2) Alternative B, the 

relocation of an additional 2,000 

personnel for a total of 5,000 personnel, 

including those under Alternative A; 

and (3) the No Action Alternative. 

Under both Alternatives A and B, two 

sites for the BRAC action, one located in 

the southern portion of the Russell Road 

Area, and the other in the northern 

portion of the MCB–1 Area, are 

analyzed as the BRAC site options 

(BRAC Option 1 (Russell Road) and 

BRAC Option 2 (MCB–1)). 

The Notice of Intent (NOI) published 

for this EIS in the Federal Register on 

3 August 2006 identified five 

alternatives, including the no action 

alternative, for analysis in this EIS. In 

addition to Alternatives A and B, the 

NOI indicated that a high intensity 

development alternative would be 

assessed that would add up to 10,000 

personnel, including 3,000 under BRAC, 

and a medium intensity development 

alternative would be assessed that 

would add up to 7,000 personnel, 

including 3,000 under BRAC. Following 

a preliminary assessment of the 

proposed sites west of I–95 and further 

examination of known requirements, 

only Alternatives A and B were carried 

forward for analysis. 

At this time, a preferred alternative 

has not been selected. The DEIS analysis 

indicate that the increased level of 

development and personnel under 

Alternative B compared to Alternative A 

would be expected to cause a 

commensurate increase in the level of 

impacts. 

The DEIS finds that traffic impacts at 

base access points are similar for both 

alternatives. Major MCBQ access points 

currently perform unacceptably and 

regional growth will further degrade 

intersections unless improvements are 

made. Alternatives have unacceptable 

levels of service at U.S. Route 1 and I–

95 intersections, and at proposed 

development sites. The DEIS identifies 

traffic mitigation measures. 

The DEIS also finds that the amount 

of development from the proposed 

alternatives is small compared to the 

amount of undeveloped land that would 

remain, largely forested, minimizing 

impacts to natural resources. There 

would be no effect to threatened and 

endangered species; however, 

alternatives could impact a small 

amount of wetlands. The DEIS finds that 

potential regional growth from either 

alternative is not large compared to 

projected growth already expected for 

the surrounding region and the resulting 

socioeconomic impacts from either 

alternative are less than significant. 

Potential impacts, such as noise, caused 

by proximity to military training 

activities that would remain in the 

Westside, can be acceptably minimized 

in the facility design process, and 

development is a compatible land use at 

the proposed sites. The sites avoid 

impacting cultural resources and air 

emissions are not expected to exceed 

the thresholds established for general 

conformity to state implementation 

plans or to require a new source review. 

The DEIS has been distributed to 

various federal, state, and local 

agencies, elected officials, special 

interest groups, and interested parties. 

The DEIS is also available for public 

review at the following local libraries: 

Central Rappahannock Regional Library, 

Dumfries Neighborhood Library, and the 

Prince William Public Library System. 

The DEIS is also available at the 

following Web site: http:// 

www.quantico.usmc.mil/activities/

display.aspx?PID=1814&Section=NREA. 

The Marine Corps invites the general 

public, local governments, other federal 

agencies, and state agencies to submit 

written comments or suggestions 

concerning the alternatives and analysis 

addressed in the DEIS. The public and 

government agencies are invited to 

participate in the public meetings where 

oral and written comments will be 

received. Two public meetings will be 

held. The first public meeting will be 

held on 6 August 2007 from 7:30 p.m. 

to 9:30 p.m. at the Stafford County 

Government Center Board Room, 1300 

Courthouse Road, Stafford, VA. The 

second public meeting will be held on 

13 August 2007 from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 

p.m. at the Doctor A. J. Ferlazzo 

Building, 15941 Donald Curtis Drive, 

Prince William, VA. All comments must 

be received by 4 September 2007. 

Dated: July 16, 2007. 

L.R. Almand, 

Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. 

Navy, Administrative Law Division, Federal 

Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–14126 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of Navy 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy 

is deleting a system of records in its 

existing inventory of record systems 

subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 

U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

DATES: This proposed action will be 

effective without further notice on 

August 20, 2007 unless comments are 

received which result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the 

Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA 

Policy Branch, Chief of Naval 

Operations (DNS–36), 2000 Navy 

Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350–2000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. 

Doris Lama at (202) 685–6545. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department the Navy systems of records 

notices subject to the Privacy Act of 

1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have 

been published in the Federal Register 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

39804 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices 

and are available from the address 

above. 

The Department of Navy proposes to 

delete a system of records notice from 

its inventory of record systems subject 

to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 

552a), as amended. The proposed 

deletion is not within the purview of 

subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 

(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which 

requires the submission of new or 

altered systems reports. 

Dated: July 13, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

N12930–2 

SYSTEM NAME: 

Area Coordinator Information and 

Operation Files (February 22, 1993, 58 

FR 10825). 

REASON: 

Program changed which required the 

establishment of a new system. The new 

system is N12713–1, Equal Employment 

Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Tracking 

System which was published in the 

Federal Register on May 14, 2007, 72 

FR 27094. 

[FR Doc. 07–3534 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection Requests 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management, invites 

comments on the proposed information 

collection requests as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before 

September 18, 2007. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The IC Clearance 

Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, publishes that notice 

containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g., new, revision, extension, existing 

or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary 

of the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

The Department of Education is 

especially interested in public comment 

addressing the following issues: (1) Is 

this collection necessary to the proper 

functions of the Department; (2) will 

this information be processed and used 

in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate 

of burden accurate; (4) how might the 

Department enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (5) how might the 

Department minimize the burden of this 

collection on the respondents, including 

through the use of information 

technology. 

Dated: July 16, 2007. 

Angela C. Arrington, 

IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Institute of Education Sciences 

Type of Review: Revision. 

Title: National Evaluation of the 

Comprehensive Technical Assistance 

Centers. 

Frequency: One time. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 2,124. 

Burden Hours: 1,709. 

Abstract: The purpose of this study is 

to evaluate the Comprehensive 

Technical Assistance Centers created to 

assist state education agencies with the 

implementation of the requirements of 

No Child Left Behind legislation. Four 

key methods will be used in this study: 

(1) Site visits conducted to each Center 

to learn about the Center’s relationships 

with its clients and the types of 

products and services that are delivered; 

(2) expert panel review of a sample of 

projects undertaken by each Center to 

assess the quality of the technical 

assistance provided; (3) a survey of 

Center clients to rate the relevance, 

usefulness and other aspects of the 

services they have received; and (4) a 

survey of senior SEA officials who are 

responsible for negotiating with the 

Centers to ensure that the nature of 

technical assistance provided 

corresponds to state priorities. 

Requests for copies of the proposed 

information collection request may be 

accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, 

by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending 

Collections’’ link and by clicking on 

link number 3414. When you access the 

information collection, click on 

‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view. 

Written requests for information should 

be addressed to U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 

Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington, 

D.C. 20202–4700. Requests may also be 

electronically mailed to: 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–

245–6623. Please specify the complete 

title of the information collection when 

making your request. 

Comments regarding burden and/or 

the collection activity requirements 

should be electronically mailed to: 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who 

use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–

800–877–8339. 

[FR Doc. E7–14027 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Federal Pell Grant, Academic 

Competitiveness Grant, National 

Science and Mathematics Access To 

Retain Talent Grant, Federal Perkins 

Loan, Federal Work-Study, Federal 

Supplemental Educational Opportunity 

Grant, Federal Family Education Loan, 

and William D. Ford Federal Direct 

Loan Programs; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Student Aid, U.S. 

Department of Education. 

ACTION: Correction; Notice of revision of 

the Federal Need Analysis Methodology 

for the 2008–2009 award year. 

SUMMARY: We correct two column 

headings for the Education Savings and 

Asset Protection Allowance tables in the 

notice published on June 1, 2007 (72 FR 

30570). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 1, 

2007, we published a notice in the 

Federal Register (72 FR 30568–30572), 

Notice of revision of the Federal Need 

Analysis Methodology for the 2008–

2009 award year. The heading ‘‘If the 

age of the student is’’ (as published in 

the three tables on page 30570) is 

corrected to read, ‘‘If the age of the older 

parent is’’. This correction should be 

made only to the first of the three tables, 

titled ‘‘Dependent Students’’ on page 

30570. The right column of the same 

table (Dependent Students) is labeled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES