alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ASCENT ASSURANCE, INC.
                             110 West Seventh Street
                                    Suite 300
                              Fort Worth, TX 76102

                                                                   June 14, 2000


Mr. Patrick H. O'Neill
4001 Briarhaven Court
Fort Worth, TX  76109

Dear Patrick:

     On behalf of Ascent Assurance,  Inc., the undersigned  hereby gives notice,
pursuant to Section 3 of your  Employment  Agreement,  dated as of September 15,
1998,  with the  Corporation  that the  Employment  Agreement is extended  until
September 15, 2001.

                                Very truly yours,

                                Ascent Assurance, Inc.


                                By:  /s/ Paul E. Suckow
                                     Paul E. Suckow
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending June 4, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# EUR-Lex - 52002XC0430(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52002XC0430(01)

**Commission notice updating the list of parties under examination pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China **

*
Official Journal C 103 , 30/04/2002 P. 0002 - 0004 *

Commission notice updating the list of parties under examination pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China

(2002/C 103/02)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97(1) of 20 January 1997 authorises the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China. This duty resulted from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97(2) of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93(3), and maintained by Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000(4). Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 88/97 comprises a list of parties whose requests for authorisation for exemption from the extended duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 were under examination.

Interested parties are hereby informed of the receipt of further requests for exemption, pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97, and of requests which are still under examination at this stage. The suspension from the extended duty, following these requests, took effect as shown in Annex I to this notice, which constitutes an updated list of parties under examination.

(1) OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55.

(3) OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39.

ANNEX I

Parties under examination

>TABLE>
Exhibit 10.35.1


Patent, Information and Trademark Agreement - Amendment No. 1

The agreement dated February 9, 1998 by and between Compositech Ltd. and
Compositech Taiwan or Compositech Technologies Inc. is hereby amended effective
February 9, 1998 as follows:

Article 1.2 Licensed Products and Article 1.3 Licensor's Patents are deleted and
replaced by the following:

1.2 Licensed Products. "Licensed Products" shall mean copper clad laminates for
use as printed circuit boards, in which the filaments in the layers are parallel
rather than woven, but excluding all such laminates within the scope of any
claims of Licensor's Patents relating to (i) multilayer printed circuit boards,
as defined in claims 86-95 or made by the method defined in claims 96-104 of
Licensor's R.O.C. patent 34,906, and (ii) integral circuits, as defined in
claims 19 and 35 or made according to the method or with the apparatus defined
in claims 16, 33, 34, 36, 37, 43, 44, 53, 54 or 72 of Licensor's R.O.C. patent
34,906, provided that the metal or conductive surface is in the form of a
circuit and further provided that the circuit is formed on the tooling and
transferred to the laminate or printed circuit board during the molding process.

1.3 Licensor's Patents. "Licensor's Patents" shall mean all patents and/or
applications in the Territory owned or controlled by Licensor or under which
Licensor has the right to grant licenses at any time during the term of this
Agreement and relating to the field of Licensed Products, and any and all
reissues, extensions, patents of addition and patents for improvements thereon,
including Licensor's R.O.C. Patent No. 34906 but excluding claims or parts of
claims relating to (i) multilayer printed circuit boards, as defined in claims
86-95 or made by the method defined in claims 96-104 of Licensor's R.O.C. patent
34,906, and (ii) integral circuits, as defined in claims 19 and 35 or made
according to the method or with the apparatus defined in claims 16, 33, 34, 36,
37, 43, 44, 53, 54 or 72 of Licensor's R.O.C. patent 34,906, provided that the
metal or conductive surface is in the form of a circuit and further provided
that the circuit is formed on the tooling and transferred to the laminate or
printed circuit board during the molding process.


                                            COMPOSITECH LTD.


                                            BY:____________________________
                                            Name:  Fred E. Klimpl
                                            Title:  President


                                            COMPOSITECH TAIWAN (or
                                            Compositech Technologies,
                                            Inc.)


                                            BY: ___________________________
                                            Name:
                                            Title:


                                       1
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.28 Message from the President]
[Page 1110]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.28  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.
  The Committee resumed its sitting; and after some further time spent 
therein,
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 8, 2014

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.170 Black powder for small arms. Black powder for small arms that has been classed in Division 1.1 may be reclassed as a Division 4.1 material, for domestic transportation by motor vehicle, rail freight, and cargo vessel only, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The powder must be examined and approved for Division 1.1 and Division 4.1 classification in accordance with §§ 173.56 and 173.58;
( b ) The total quantity of black powder in one transport vehicle or freight container may not exceed 45.4 kg (100 pounds) net mass. No more than four freight containers may be on board one cargo vessel;
( c ) The black powder must be packed in inner metal or heavy wall conductive plastic receptacles not over 454 g (16 ounces) net capacity each, with no more than 25 cans in one outer UN 4G fiberboard box. The inner packagings must be arranged and protected so as to prevent simultaneous ignition of the contents. The complete package must be of the same type which has been examined as required in § 173.56;
( d ) Each completed package must be marked “BLACK POWDER FOR SMALL ARMS” and “NA 0027”; and
( e ) Each package must bear the FLAMMABLE SOLID label.
[Amdt. 173-255, 61 FR 50626, Sept. 26, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 173-255, 62 FR 14338, Mar. 26, 1997; 81 FR 35542, June 2, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.30 Memorials]
[Page 833]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.30  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII,

       107. The SPEAKER presented a memorial of the Legislature of 
     the State of Maine, relative to memorializing the U.S. Postal 
     Service to issue a stamp honoring Joshua Lawrence Camberlain; 
     to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
```
United States Steel Corporation

– Minnta c

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012 **Item 15** Id entify all NO X emission sources and factors contributing to NO X emissions at the facility 's indurating furnaces, including but not limited to, the burners. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Steve Londerville (Coen) **Answer:** A report is provided that was written by Steve Londerville from Coen that addresses all of the questions in item 15.
§ 71.50-31 Continued participation in the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) program. ( a ) To continue to participate in the AHE Program, vessel operators must conduct an annual hull condition assessment. At a minimum, vessel operators must conduct an internal examination and take random hull gaugings internally during the hull condition assessment, unless waived by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI). If the annual hull assessment reveals significant damage or corrosion, where temporary repairs have been made, or where other critical areas of concern have been identified, the OCMI may require an expanded examination to include an underwater hull examination using divers. If an underwater examination is required, the examination must focus on areas at higher risk of damage or corrosion and must include a representative sampling of hull gaugings.
( b ) If an underwater survey is required for the annual hull condition assessment, the OCMI may require the presence of a third party examiner and a written hull examination report must be submitted to the OCMI. This report must include thickness gauging results, a copy of the audio and video recordings and any other information that will help the OCMI evaluate your vessel for continued participation in the AHE program. The third party examiner must sign the report and confirm the validity of its contents.
( c ) You must submit your preventive maintenance reports or checklists on an annual basis to the OCMI. These reports or checklists must conform to the plans you submitted in your application under § 71.50-19 of this part, which the OCMI approved.
( d ) Prior to each scheduled annual hull condition assessment— ( 1 ) The owner may submit to the OCMI a plan for conducting the assessment, or a request for a waiver of this requirement, no fewer than 30 days before the scheduled assessment; and
( 2 ) The OCMI may reduce the scope or extend the interval of the assessment if the operational, casualty, and deficiency history of the vessel, along with a recommendation of the vessel's master, indicates that it is warranted.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21078, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended by USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47382, Aug. 5, 2004]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending October 29, 2011

|Filer                            | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|CIT GROUP INC.                   | Investment     | CIT Group Inc., Livingston, New Jersey, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K, to retain an investment in Equipment Protection Services (Europe) Limited, Dublin, Ireland.                                                       | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                       | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable
|RAIFFEISEN BANK INTERNATIONAL AG | FBSEA          | Raiffeisen Bank International AG, Vienna, Austria, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended and Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable 
|Newspaper:                       | Not available 
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                    | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ADIRONDACK TC, SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK | 645317 | 06/13/2011 | 10/17/2011     | O         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### John Mills and another, *Respondents,*v. Ellen M. Brown, *Appel*lant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bookes, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Clinton H. HowardClinton H. Howard Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer April 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 172.553 [Reserved]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0450. LOUIS EUGENE ABRAM v. THE STATE.

A jury found Louis Eugene Abram guilty of child molestation, statutory rape,

and other crimes, and he was sentenced on May 16, 2016. He filed a timely motion

for new trial, which the trial court denied on July 28, 2020. Abram filed a notice of

appeal on August 31, 2020. However, we lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the

appealable order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of

appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Couch v.

United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721, 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997).

Abram’s notice of appeal was untimely filed 34 days after entry of the order he seeks

to appeal. Accordingly, his notice of appeal is untimely, and this case is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Because Abram is represented by counsel, he is informed of the following in

accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This appeal

has been dismissed because of your counsel’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal.

If you still wish to appeal, you may request the trial court to grant an out-of-time

appeal. If the trial court grants an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from that

grant in which to instigate an appeal. If the trial court denies your request for an outof-time appeal, you may appeal that denial by filing a notice of appeal within 30 days

of the denial. If you no longer wish to appeal your conviction, you need not do

anything else. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to

December 11, 2020
Abram and to Abram’s attorney, and the latter is also DIRECTED to send a copy to

Abram.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/11/2020
§ 1542.113 Airport tenant security programs. ( a ) TSA may approve an airport tenant security program as follows: ( 1 ) The tenant must assume responsibility for specified security measures of the secured area, AOA, or SIDA as provided in §§ 1542.201, 1542.203, and 1542.205.
( 2 ) The tenant may not assume responsibility for law enforcement support under § 1542.215.
( 3 ) The tenant must assume the responsibility within the tenant's leased areas or areas designated for the tenant's exclusive use. A tenant may not assume responsibility under a tenant security program for the airport passenger terminal.
( 4 ) Responsibility must be exclusive to one tenant, and shared responsibility among tenants is not permitted.
( 5 ) TSA must find that the tenant is able and willing to carry out the airport tenant security program.
( b ) An airport tenant security program must be in writing, signed by the airport operator and the airport tenant, and maintained in the airport security program. The airport tenant security program must include the following: ( 1 ) A description and a map of the boundaries and pertinent features of each area over which the airport tenant will exercise security responsibilities.
( 2 ) A description of the measures the airport tenant has assumed.
( 3 ) Measures by which the airport operator will monitor and audit the tenant's compliance with the security program.
( 4 ) Monetary and other penalties to which the tenant may be subject if it fails to carry out the airport tenant security program.
( 5 ) Circumstances under which the airport operator will terminate the airport tenant security program for cause.
( 6 ) A provision acknowledging that the tenant is subject to inspection by TSA in accordance with § 1542.5.
( 7 ) A provision acknowledging that individuals who carry out the tenant security program are contracted to or acting for the airport operator and are required to protect sensitive information in accordance with part 1520 of this chapter, and may be subject to civil penalties for failing to protect sensitive security information.
( 8 ) Procedures by which the tenant will immediately notify the airport operator of and provide for alternative security measures for changed conditions as described in § 1542.103(a).
( c ) If TSA has approved an airport tenant security program, the airport operator may not be found to be in violation of a requirement of this part in any case in which the airport operator demonstrates that: ( 1 ) The tenant or an employee, permittee, or invitee of the tenant, is responsible for such violation; and
( 2 ) The airport operator has complied with all measures in its security program to ensure the tenant has complied with the airport tenant security program.
( d ) TSA may amend or terminate an airport tenant security program in accordance with § 1542.105.