alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,273
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,202
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    134,875
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          43,675
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            44,450
<LOANS>                                        301,689
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,990
<DEPOSITS>                                     412,246
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,654
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,611
<LONG-TERM>                                     49,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,048
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 520,990
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,788
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,743
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    45
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,576
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,481
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,987
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,589
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      306
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 105
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,560
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,560
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.94
<LOANS-NON>                                        770
<LOANS-PAST>                                         2
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,008
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,130
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      221
<RECOVERIES>                                        97
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,312
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,312
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Tuli Goldenthal et al., Composing the Firm of Goldenthal Brothers, Respondents, *v.*Kalman Popper, Appellant.

*Goldenthal*v. *Popper,*130 App. Div. 902, affirmed.

(Submitted October 19, 1910;

decided November 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 26, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered.

*Joel Krone*for appellant.

*Eugene I. Yuells*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LUIS D. RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 507 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHI N GTO N , D
. C
. 204 60**APR-~** 

## 2016 Maureen Sullivan Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (En v ironment , Safety and Occupational He alth) 3400 Defense Pentagon Washington DC 20301-3400 Dea r Ms. Sullivan: OFFICE OF LAND AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Thank you for your letter , dated March 21,2016 , requesting an extension of the 60-day comment period for the proposed rulemaking to add a subsurface intrusion component to the Hazard Ranking System
. EPA published this proposed action in the Federal Register on February 29 , 2016. You requested a 60-day extension of the comment period to allow adequate time for Department of D efense (DoD) to respond to the lengthy and complex propo sed rule. E PA is denying your request to extend the public comment period. We understand and apprec iate your concerns and sincerely value DoD ' s input on the proposed rulemaking. DoD had many opportun it ies to raise concerns during the six-month interagency re view period prior to the proposed ru le's publication. The interagency review concluded on Dec ember 21 , 2015, at which time EPA provided a red line/ strikeout ver s ion of the proposed rule incorporating revisions based on DoD's concerns (see document number EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-1086

- 0067 in http ://www . regulations
. gov)
. While we acknowledge that the proposed rule rai ses technical issues that require consideration , we believe that the six-month interagency review period, the additional two
-month peri od pr i or to publicat ion plus the 60

- day comment period all provide amp le time for DoD to review the information and prepare comments . EPA can guarantee consideration only ofthose comments postmarked by th e close of the comment period on April29, 2016
. We wi ll carefully consider all comments submitted during the comment period before we make a fina l decision regarding the addition of a subsurface intrusion component to the Hazard Ranking System
. Sincerely,

# ~s!U(d James E. Woolford Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Techno logy Inno vati on
Court of Appeals No.

Trial Court Cause No. 15

- 05

- 0240

- CVW

In the 81 st /218 th Judicial District Court

Of Wilson County, Texas

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

Elgin Tracy, Adolph Tracy & Travis Morgan, Appellants

Vs

Edward W. Chamrad, Jr., App ellee

Appealed to the 4 th Court of Appeals at San Antonio, Texas

Attorneys for Appellants : Attorney for Appellee

R. Adam Swick Ryan C. Reed

SBOT: 24051794 SBOT: 24065957

1301 S. Capital of Texas Highway 2161 NW Military Highway

Building C, Suite 300 Suite 400

Austin, TX 78746 San Antonio, TX 78213

Trent C. Rowell

SBOT: 50511930

P.O. Box 457

Stockdale, TX 78160

Electronically filed with the Co urt of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas on the ___ day of

August, 2015.

Signature of Clerk/Deputy______________________________________

Deborah Bryan, District Clerk
98-2316.

#### Elfyin v. Tuscarawas Cty. Health Dept.

Tuscarawas App. No. 98AP010001. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ decision,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.
----

| Section 3. | TRUSTEE RESPONSIBILITY REGARDING PAYMENTS TO TRUST BENEFICIARY WHEN PICO IS INSOLVENT. |
|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | “PICO” PICO DEFERRED HOLDINGS, LLC By:  /s/ James F. MosierJames F. Mosier, SecretaryDated:  November 25, 2008  By:  /s/ Richard H. SharpeRichard H. Sharpe, PresidentDated:  December 3, 2008                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | “TRUSTEE” UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.  By:  /s/ John FultonJohn Fulton, Vice PresidentDated:  November 25, 2008  By:  /s/ Katherine M. OlsonKatherine M. Olson, VP and Trust OfficerDated:  November 25, 2008 |

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending February 23, 2013

|Filer                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FULL SERVICE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. | CIC           | Change in Control notice by Richard Lee Newman, Mayville, North Dakota, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of Full Service Insurance Agency Inc., Buxton, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of First State Bank, Buxton, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/05/2013
|Newspaper:                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                   | 03/05/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2013 (April 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending November 16, 2013

----

Testimony and Statements            Confirmation Hearing -- statement by Vice Chair Yellen before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on her nomination as Chair of the Board.            -Published, November 14, 2013            Monetary and Financial Policy            Term Deposit Facility -- fixed-rate offering of 28-day term deposits with full allotment of tenders on November 18, 2013.            -Announced, November 13, 2013            Personnel            Management Division -- appointment of Jeffrey A. Martin as assistant director.            -Approved, October 11, 2013            (A/C)          Regulations and Policies            Community Reinvestment Act -- final new and revised interagency questions and answers regarding community reinvestment.            -Approved, September 30, 2013            (A/C)                      Regulations Z (Truth in Lending) and M (Consumer Leasing) -- final rules, issued jointly with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, adjusting the dollar thresholds for exempt consumer credit and consumer lease transactions, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, November 12, 2013            Enforcement            North Milwaukee Bancshares, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, November 14, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
§ 1542.201 Security of the secured area. ( a ) Each airport operator required to have a security program under § 1542.103(a) must establish at least one secured area.
( b ) Each airport operator required to establish a secured area must prevent and detect the unauthorized entry, presence, and movement of individuals and ground vehicles into and within the secured area by doing the following: ( 1 ) Establish and carry out measures for controlling entry to secured areas of the airport in accordance with § 1542.207.
( 2 ) Provide for detection of, and response to, each unauthorized presence or movement in, or attempted entry to, the secured area by an individual whose access is not authorized in accordance with its security program.
( 3 ) Establish and carry out a personnel identification system described under § 1542.211.
( 4 ) Subject each individual to employment history verification as described in § 1542.209 before authorizing unescorted access to a secured area.
( 5 ) Train each individual before granting unescorted access to the secured area, as required in § 1542.213(b).
( 6 ) Post signs at secured area access points and on the perimeter that provide warning of the prohibition against unauthorized entry. Signs must be posted by each airport operator in accordance with its security program not later than November 14, 2003.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1032

BIN LIN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals 

(No. A70-505-315)

Submitted: May 25, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit

Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bin Lin, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Bin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)

denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings.

We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen.

See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we

deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.

See In re: Lin, No. A70-505-315 (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6547

PERRY CRAIG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden; CHARLES CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1006-0-11) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perry Craig, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).The district court entered its order on April 3, 1997; Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on April 9, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION     I, Laura E. Ristvedt, Principal Financial Officer of Southeast Management Group, LLC, generalpartner of Southeast Acquisitions II, L.P. (“Registrant”) certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, ofSoutheast Acquisitions II, L.P. (“Registrant”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 26, 2007 /s/ Laura E. Ristvedt         Laura E. Ristvedt    Principal Financial Officer    Southern Management Group, LLC
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
 Dated: August 10, 2007/s/ Michael C. Mayer
    
    /s/ Linda J. MilesMichael C. Mayer
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.


We consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  registration  statements  (No.
33-54707),  (No.  33-96122) and (No. 33-96122) and (No. 33-96118) on Form S-8 of
Copley Pharmaceutical,  Inc. of our report dated January 27, 1998, on our audits
of the  consolidated  statements of  operations,  shareholders'  equity and cash
flows for the years ended  December 31, 1997 and 1996,  which report  appears in
the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP
98-2135.

#### State v. Jones.

Hamilton App. No. C-970692. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). This cause is therefore dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING BALANCE SHEET OF MGI PHARMA, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, AND THE
RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,007,799
<SECURITIES>                                10,505,095
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,696,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                    97,155
<INVENTORY>                                    627,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,985,412
<PP&E>                                         646,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                 933,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,092,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,160,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,931,766
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,092,128
<SALES>                                      5,889,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,991,158
<CGS>                                          500,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,594,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (167,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (167,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (167,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>