alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**520 CAF 14-00274**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID W., JR.

------------------------------------------ ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
DAVID W., SR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL).

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered August 9, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights with respect to his son on the ground of permanent neglect. Contrary to the father’s contention, Family Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to enter a suspended judgment ( see Matter of Arella D.P.-D. , 35 AD3d 1222, 1223, lv denied 8 NY3d 809). Petitioner established that the father failed to comply with his service plan, i.e., he failed to complete substance abuse treatment successfully, attend scheduled visitation with the child consistently, or verify that he had obtained stable income and housing ( see Matter of Mikia H. [Monique K

. ] , 78 AD3d 1575, 1576, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 16 NY3d 760). “The record therefore supports the court’s refusal to grant a suspended judgment inasmuch as the record establishes that the [father] had no ‘realistic feasible plan to care for the child[ ] . . . and . . . that [he] was not likely to change [his] behavior’ ” ( Matter of Dahmani M. [Jana M.] , 104 AD3d 1245, 1246; see Matter of Sean W. [Brittany W.] , 87 AD3d 1318, 1319, lv denied 18 NY3d 802).

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 120 (Friday, June 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3096]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, July 12, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review Meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-3096 Filed 6-13-07; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### In the Matter of the Will of Samuel Cottrell.—

Decree affirmed, vdth costs against appellant. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
#### Minnie Angermiller, Appellant, *v.*Charles Ewald, Respondent.

Reported below, 133 App. Div. 691.

(Argued October 5, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Appeal from ’ an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 15, 1909, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered *565upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial in an action to impress a trust on the proceeds of certain real property.

*Oliver O.*Carpenter, *Charles P. Rogers*and *Vincente K. Smith*for appellant.

*Oscar Lowenstein*and *Melville II. Cane*for respondent.

Plaintiff given permission to withdraw appeal on payment within twenty days of costs of appeal to be taxed. On failure to make such payment within said time, the order is affirmed and judgment absolute ordered on the stipulation against appellant, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Wbbneb, Willabd Babtlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
§ 1520.7 Covered persons. Persons subject to the requirements of part 1520 are: ( a ) Each airport operator, aircraft operator, and fixed base operator subject to the requirements of subchapter C of this chapter, and each armed security officer under subpart B of part 1562.
( b ) Each indirect air carrier (IAC), as described in 49 CFR part 1548; and each certified cargo screening facility and its personnel, as described in 49 CFR part 1549.
( c ) Each owner, charterer, or operator of a vessel, including foreign vessel owners, charterers, and operators, required to have a security plan under Federal or International law.
( d ) Each owner or operator of a maritime facility required to have a security plan under the Maritime Transportation Security Act, (Pub.L. 107-295), 46 U.S.C. 70101 *et seq.,* 33 CFR part 6, or 33 U.S.C. 1221 *et seq.*
( e ) Each person performing the function of a computer reservation system or global distribution system for airline passenger information.
( f ) Each person participating in a national or area security committee established under 46 U.S.C. 70112, or a port security committee.
( g ) Each industry trade association that represents covered persons and has entered into a non-disclosure agreement with the DHS or DOT.
( h ) DHS and DOT.
( i ) Each person conducting research and development activities that relate to aviation or maritime transportation security and are approved, accepted, funded, recommended, or directed by DHS or DOT.
( j ) Each person who has access to SSI, as specified in § 1520.11.
( k ) Each person employed by, contracted to, or acting for a covered person, including a grantee of DHS or DOT, and including a person formerly in such position.
( l ) Each person for which a vulnerability assessment has been directed, created, held, funded, or approved by the DOT, DHS, or that has prepared a vulnerability assessment that will be provided to DOT or DHS in support of a Federal security program.
( m ) Each person receiving SSI under § 1520.15(d) or (e).
( n ) Each owner/operator of maritime or surface transportation subject to the requirements of subchapter D of this chapter.
[69 FR 28082, May 18, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 41600, July 19, 2005; 73 FR 72173, Nov. 26, 2008; 74 FR 47695, Sept. 16, 2009; 76 FR 51867, Aug. 18, 2011; 85 FR 16499, Mar. 23, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,474
<PP&E>                                          16,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,580
<BONDS>                                          2,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,658
<SALES>                                          6,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,780
<CGS>                                            4,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes Of This Exhibit, Primary Means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 56.20-1 General. ( a ) Valves certified in accordance with subpart 50.25 of this subchapter are acceptable for use in piping systems.
( b ) Non-welded valves complying with the standards listed in § 56.60-1 may be used within the specified pressure and temperature ratings of those standards, provided the limitations of § 56.07-10(c) are applied. Materials must comply with subpart 56.60. Welded valves complying with the standards and specifications listed in § 56.60-1 may be used in Class II systems only unless they meet paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) All other valves must meet the following: ( 1 ) All materials must be accepted in accordance with § 56.60-1.
( 2 ) The maximum allowable working pressure may be determined by § 56.15-1(c)(2).
( 3 ) Valves must be tested in accordance with the requirements of the applicable incorporated standard or subpart 56.97.
( 4 ) If welded, valves must be welded in accordance with subpart 56.70 and part 57 of this subchapter or by other processes specifically approved by the Marine Safety Center.
[CGD 77-140, 54 FR 40604, Oct. 2, 1989; 55 FR 39968, Oct. 1, 1990; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending March 17, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST PACTRUST BANCORP, INC. | * 4c8* 3A1    | First PacTrust Bancorp, Inc., Chula Vista, California, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Beach Business Bank, Manhattan Beach, California, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, and 2)to retain 100 percent control of Pacific Trust Bank, fsb,Chula Vista, California, and thereby engage in operating a nonbank thrift subsidiary, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/21/2012
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 02/21/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1312.16 Substitution of service. If a water or motor carrier (hereafter referred to as Carrier A) desires to have the option of substituting the services of a carrier of a different transportation mode (hereafter referred to as Carrier B) for part of its movement of a shipment, it may do so if: ( a ) The shipment moves on the bill of lading that would be used if Carrier A were performing the service;
( b ) Carrier A assumes the responsibility for the lading while it is in the possession of Carrier B; and
( c ) Movement of the lading has been made prior to, or will be made subsequent to, the service performed by Carrier B.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 121 (Monday, June 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Mechanisms of Preeclampsia: 
Impact of Obesity.
    Date: July 17, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Rm. 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c50594f465f4645587c515d555012525554125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f59990868f968f8c91b598949c99db9b9c9ddb929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 15, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3082 Filed 6-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2408
PATSY G. VANCE, Widow of Kenneth Vance, Petitioner - Appellant, versusDIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent - Appellee.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (92-1108-BLA) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patsy G. Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Jennifer U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Appellant noted this appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period established by 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (1988). A late notice of appeal precludes this court's jurisdiction to review the decision of the Board. Adkins v. Director, OWCP , 889 F.2d 1360, 1361 (4th Cir. 1989). The Board entered its final order on March 13, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 17, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal deprives this court ofjurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore grant the Director's motion to dismiss the appeal and suspend the briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 10.1 Applicability.

This part implements section 552a of title 5, United States Code, as well as other provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and prescribes rules governing the availability of those records of the Department of Transportation which relate to citizens of the United States and aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

[45 FR 8993, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended at 62 FR 23666, May 1, 1997]
Record of Discussion 

### Docket No . FAA· Directorate Identifier : 20 15 -CE -023 -AD

Witb wbom outside tbe FAA bas tbis AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Piper Aircraft Ken Fraley, Eric several Other . List below . Wright

Other/Additional Information: Piper involved in root cause analysis, risk review, and corrective action development



### 9
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 4, 2010

|Filer                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5         | First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., Hammond, Louisiana, to merge with Greensburg Bancshares, Inc., and thereby acquire its subsidiary, Bank of Greensburg, both of Greensburg, Louisiana. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                      | Not available
|Federal Register:               | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 8, 2012

|Filer                                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE INTERNATIONAL INC. | Investment     | Prior Notice by Key Equipment Finance International, Inc., to Make an Additional Investment Pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                               | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
This document is protected under FIFRA. Document may be requested under the 

Freedom of Information Act at Http://www.epa/pesticide/foia but access is 

restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or distribution of pesticides 

outside the United States.
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.25-55 Cargo piping. ( a ) Piping shall be of seamless steel meeting the requirements of § 56.60-1 of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter. The piping shall be of not less than Schedule 40 thickness. In case of piping on the discharge side of the liquid pumps or vapor compressors, the design shall be for a pressure of not less than the pump or compressor relief valve setting; or if the piping is not fitted with relief valves, the design pressure shall not be less than the total discharge head of the pump or compressor.
( b ) Where necessary, provision shall be made for expansion and contraction of piping by means of seamless steel pipe expansion bends. Special consideration will be given for packless type expansion joints. Slip type expansion joints are prohibited. Piping shall be provided with adequate support to take the weight of the piping off the valves and fittings.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 17022, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18902, Dec. 18, 1968]