alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 177.823 Movement of motor vehicles in emergency situations. ( a ) A carrier may not move a transport vehicle containing a hazardous material unless the vehicle is marked and placarded in accordance with part 172 or as authorized in § 171.12a of this subchapter, or unless, in an emergency: ( 1 ) The vehicle is escorted by a representative of a state or local government;
( 2 ) The carrier has permission from the Department; or
( 3 ) Movement of the transport vehicle is necessary to protect life or property.
( b ) *Disposition of contents of cargo tank when unsafe to continue.* In the event of a leak in a cargo tank of such a character as to make further transportation unsafe, the leaking vehicle should be removed from the traveled portion of the highway and every available means employed for the safe disposal of the leaking material by preventing, so far as practicable, its spread over a wide area, such as by digging trenches to drain to a hole or depression in the ground, diverting the liquid away from streams or sewers if possible, or catching the liquid in containers if practicable. Smoking, and any other source of ignition, in the vicinity of a leaking cargo tank is not permitted.
( c ) *Movement of leaking cargo tanks.* A leaking cargo tank may be transported only the minimum distance necessary to reach a place where the contents of the tank or compartment may be disposed of safely. Every available means must be utilized to prevent the leakage or spillage of the liquid upon the highway.
[Amdt. 177-35, 41 FR 16130, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 177-67, 50 FR 41521, Oct. 11, 1985; Amdt. 177-86, 61 FR 18933, Apr. 29, 1996]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1943

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem certain municipal

wastewater treatment facilities discharging into ocean waters as the

equivalent of secondary treatment facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 1995

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. HUNTER,

and Mr. FILNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem

certain municipal wastewater treatment facilities discharging into ocean waters as the equivalent of secondary

treatment facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Diego Coastal

5 Corrections Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1943 IH

1 SEC. 2. COASTAL DISCHARGES.

2 Section 304(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Con3 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1314(d)) is amended by adding at the

4 end the following:

5 ‘‘(5) COASTAL DISCHARGES.—For purposes of

6 this subsection, any municipal wastewater treatment

7 facility shall be deemed the equivalent of a second8 ary treatment facility if each of the following re9 quirements is met:

10 ‘‘(A) The facility employs chemically en11 hanced primary treatment.

12 ‘‘(B) The facility, on the date of the enact13 ment of this paragraph, discharges through an

14 ocean outfall into an open marine environment

15 greater than 4 miles offshore into a depth

16 greater than 300 feet.

17 ‘‘(C) The facility’s discharge is in compli18 ance with all local and State water quality

19 standards for the receiving waters.

20 ‘‘(D) The facility’s discharge will be sub21 ject to an ocean monitoring program acceptable

22 to relevant Federal and State regulatory agen23 cies.’’.

Æ
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 
 English Summary of Lease Agreement (the “Lease”), dated May 14, 2008, by and between Nachum Levy, as landlord, and Evogene Ltd. (the “Company”), as tenant.

  

	 	•	 	 Premises Covered by Lease: Approximately 10 dunams (10,000 square meters or approximately 108,000 square feet) of land located in Kibbutz Naan,
Israel. 


  

	 	•	 	 Permitted Use of Leased Premises: Performance of scientific experiments on plants, as well as storage of seeds, equipment, and materials related
to such experiments, and office use. 


  

	 	•	 	 Term of Lease: Initial term of the Lease is from October 1, 2008 until October 1, 2011. The Company is granted an option at any time
during the initial Lease term to extend the term of the Lease for an additional period of 3 to 5 years from the termination of the initial Lease term. On March 27, 2011 the Company exercised this extension option for the full 5 year extension
period. 


  

	 	•	 	 Monthly Rent: NIS 17,000 + VAT per dunam. 


  

	 	•	 	 Termination: In the case of a breach by the Landlord, following 10 days notice of the breach, the Company may withhold rent for the period of
the breach and may also terminate the Lease. In case of a material breach by one party to the Lease, the other party may inform the breaching party of the breach, and if the breach is not cured within 14 days after such notice, the non-breaching
party may then terminate the Lease by providing 7 days prior written notice. 


  

	 	•	 	 Modifications to Leased Premises: The Company is permitted to effect any temporary modifications to the leased premises at its discretion,
subject to any third-party permits that may be required. All impermanent structures, infrastructure and facilities that may be built by the Company on the leased premises will be owned exclusively by the Company.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Extension of comment period and rescheduling of Public Hearing.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Notice of Availability for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, May 18, 2007 (72 FR 28032), required comments be submitted on or before July 2, 2007. An editorial correction of the Notice document was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, June 2, 2007 (72 FR 31660). The comment period has been extended to September 4, 2007. Additionally, the June 5, 2007, Public Hearing on the proposed project has been rescheduled to August 9, 2007, at the Bauer Community Center, 2300 North Highway 35, Port Lavaca, TX 77979. Poster presentations will be available for viewing and project team members will be present to discuss the                               ( print page 39802)                            DEIS at a Workshop that will precede the Public Hearing. The Workshop will be conducted from 5 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. and the formal Public Hearing will comment at 7 p.m.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Denise Sloan, Regulatory Project Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District, P.O. Box 1229, Galveston, TX 77553-1229, (409) 766-3962.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3536 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-52-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          75,977
<SECURITIES>                                   126,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (212)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,514
<PP&E>                                         470,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                 196,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 507,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,705
<BONDS>                                        101,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,069<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     264,245<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   507,855
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (55)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 75,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,726
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,276
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48
<FN>
<F1>REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $369,810 ALLOCABLE TO 3,698,100 SHARES OF TREASURY
STOCK.
<F2>REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $77,951,000 ALLOCABLE TO 3,698,100 SHARES OF TREASURY
STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Exhibit 10.40

March 16, 2004

Patrick H. ONeill Executive
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary Ascent Assurance, Inc. 801 Cherry Street,
Suite 3100 Fort Worth, Texas 76102

|Re: | Extension of the "Patrick H.  O'Neill  Employment  Agreement"  with Ascent  Management,  Inc. and
                  Ascent Assurance, Inc. dated as of December 18, 2002 ("Employment Agreement")
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. ONeill:

The purpose of this letter is to
confirm in writing and memorialize the agreement reached, as of March 15, 2004, between
you, defined as the Executive in the above referenced Employment Agreement,
and each of Ascent Management, Inc. (AMI) and Ascent Assurance, Inc.
(AAI) to extend such Employment Agreement through March 15, 2005. More
specifically, the Expiration Date in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is
March 15, 2004. Therefore, the Employment Agreement, unless extended by mutual agreement
of the parties, would have expired at 12:00 a.m. March 16, 2004.

In consideration of the mutual
promises contained herein, the Executive and each of AMI and AAI hereby amend
such Employment Agreement, as of March 15, 2004, by deleting March 15, 2004 as
the Expiration Date in Section 3 thereof, and substituting in its place,
March 15, 2005 as such Expiration Date. Except as expressly stated
herein, the Employment Agreement is not otherwise modified or amended by the parties, such
that all other definitions, conditions, and terms contained therein shall remain, and all
present and future rights, duties and obligations of the parties thereunder shall continue
throughout both the Executives Term of Employment and as
otherwise provided in such Employment Agreement.

As evidence of the acceptance by AMI
and AAI of the terms of this letter agreement amending the Employment Agreement by
extending it through March 15, 2005, an authorized officer of each, has affixed his
signature hereto. As evidence of your acceptance of such amendment to the Employment
Agreement, please execute this letter agreement in the space provided herein below.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Patrick J. Mitchell

Patrick J. Mitchell

Agreed as to form and substance:

Ascent Management, Inc.

/s/ Patrick J. Mitchell

By: Patrick J.
Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer and President

Ascent Assurance, Inc.

/s/ Patrick J. Mitchell
By: Patrick J. Mitchell,
Chief Executive Officer and President

/s/ Patrick H.ONeill
 Patrick H. ONeill
#### § 176.715 Contamination control.

Each hold, compartment, or deck area used for the transportation of low specific activity or surface contaminated object Class 7 (radioactive) materials under exclusive use conditions in accordance with § 173.427(b)(4), or § 173.427(c) must be surveyed with appropriate radiation detection instruments after each use. Such holds, compartments, and deck areas may not be used again for Class 7 (radioactive) materials exclusive use transport service, and then only for a subsequent exclusive use shipment utilizing the provisions of § 173.427(b)(4), or § 173.427(c) until the radiation dose rate at every accessible surface is less than 0.005 mSv/h (0.5 mrem/h), and the non-fixed contamination is not greater than the limits prescribed in § 173.443(a) of this subchapter.

[79 FR 40618, July 11, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
          BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,1999 AND FROM THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
          FOR  THE  THREE  MONTHS  AND  SIX  MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
          QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         366,374
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  238,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8,625
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                         10,743,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0 <F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,769,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                        7,330,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,850,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,769,322
<SALES>                                        1,434,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,584,399
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,493,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (145,463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (145,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (145,463)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET,THEREFORE THE VALUE IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit31.2

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

CertificationPURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Patricia N. McClanahan, certify that:

1)      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofFirst Farmers and Merchants Corporation;

2)      Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3)      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)      The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a.      Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

c.       Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5)      The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.       All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

| Date | August 5, 2004 | \s\ Patricia N. McClanahan                                    |
|------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                | Patricia N. McClanahan Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Banknorth Group, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-22205, 33-22206, 33-80310, 333-17467, 333-46367,
333-49999, 333-70095, 333-72909, 333-36834, 333-61436 and 333-72692), on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-34931, 333-64845, 333-67961 and 333-81980) and on Form S-4 (No.
333-61757) of Banknorth Group, Inc. of our report, dated January 11, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Banknorth Group, Inc. as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Banknorth Group, Inc.


                                                          /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 19, 2002
#### The State ex rel. Hampe, Appellant, *v.*MTD Products, Inc. et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Hampe v. MTD Products, Inc.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 422.]

(No. 96-2734

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided February 10, 1999.)

*423
      *Ben Sheerer Lato Offices*and *Thomas R. Pitts,*for appellant.

*David R. Cook,*for appellee MTD Products, Inc.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Lisa A. Sotos,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy*and *Marc J. Jaffy,*urging reversal for *amicus curiae*Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

*Per Curiam.*

Claimant alleges that the commission abused its discretion in (1) asserting jurisdiction to reexamine the district hearing officer’s December 7,1990 TTD award and (2) setting a retroactive TTD termination date. We agree with both assertions.

*State ex rel. Nicholls v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 454, 692 N.E.2d 188, and *State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 516, 696 N.E.2d 1069, support claimant’s propositions. As to claimant’s first proposition, *Nicholls*held that the possibility of unspecified error cannot sustain the exercise of continuing jurisdiction under R.C. 4123.52. *Russell,*as to claimant’s other proposition, held that the date on which to terminate disputed TTD on the basis *424of having reached MMI is the date of the termination hearing. The commission, therefore, abused its discretion in both regards.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the commission is ordered to vacate its orders of July 6, 1992 and August 8, 1994, and to reinstate its earlier award of TTD.

*Judgment reversed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority’s determination that the date of the termination hearing is the proper date on which' to terminate total temporary disability compensation; but I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the Industrial Commission did not have jurisdiction to reconsider its order under R.C. 4123.52.