alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.33 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 748]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.33  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. GOSS: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 147. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (S. 4) to 
     grant the power to the President to reduce budget authority, 
     and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-121). Referred to the 
     House Calendar.
  

       Mr. DREIER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 148. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (S. 219) 
     to improve the economy and efficiency of Federal Government 
     operations by establishing a moratorium on regulatory 
     rulemaking actions, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-
     122). Referred to the House Calendar.
  

       Mr. YOUNG of Alaska: Committee on Resources. H.R. 1175. A 
     bill to amend Public Law 89-454 to provide for the 
     reauthorization of appropriations; with an amendment (Rept. 
     No. 104-123). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on 
     the State of the Union.
  

       Mr. LIVINGSTON: Committee of conference. Conference report 
     on H.R. 1158. A bill making emergency supplemental 
     appropriations for additional disaster assistance and making 
     rescissions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, 
     and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-124). Ordered to be 
     printed.
  

       Mr. SOLOMON: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 149. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the concurrent 
     resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) setting forth the congressional 
     budget for the U.S. Government for the fiscal years 1996, 
     1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 (Rept. No. 104-125). 
     Referred to the House Calendar.
```
**Exhibit 10.g**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**CHANGE IN CONTROL,**

**SEVERANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**FOR THOMAS R. NELSON**

 

This Amendment to the Change in Control, Severance and Employment Agreement for Thomas R. Nelson (the “Amendment”), is made this 17th day of September, 2003, between Hudson United Bancorp and Hudson United Bank (collectively, the“Company”), a New Jersey corporation which maintains its principal office at 1000 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey, and Thomas R. Nelson (the “Executive”), and amends the Change in Control, Severance and EmploymentAgreement for Thomas R. Nelson, which was made effective as of October 1, 2002 (the “Agreement”). 

 

WHEREAS, the Executive is presently an executive officer of the Company; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to amend the Agreement to clarify certain provisions therein; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for the good and valuable consideration set forth herein andthe Executive’s continued valuable service to the Company, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 

 

1. Paragraph 9(d) of the Agreement, relating to “Payments and Benefits,” is amended by adding the following language after the end of the firstsentence thereof: 

 

“For purposes of the calculation ofthe bonus amount component of the Lump Sum only, Paragraph 1(b)(ii)(B), regarding the Time of the Change of Control, will be disregarded.” 

 

2. The Company agrees that it will not treat (for tax reporting purposes or for calculation purposes under Section 10 of the Agreement) any benefits underthe Hudson United Bancorp Supplemental Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) as parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, to the extent that such benefits were vested and accrued prior to the occurrence ofthe change of control, as the SERP was not adopted in contemplation of such change of control. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,**Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorizedrepresentatives pursuant to the authority of its Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee, and the Executive has personally executed this Agreement, all as of the day and year first above written. 

 

ATTEST:
   
HUDSON UNITED BANCORP AND

HUDSON UNITED BANK

 
   
By:
 
/s/ Charles F.X. Poggi

.
     
Charles F.X. Poggi
      
Chairman,Compensation Committee

WITNESS:
   
EXECUTIVE
      
/s/ Thomas R. Nelson
      
Thomas R. Nelson
Exhibit 10(k)

 

Board Compensation

 

The passage of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange have substantially increasedthe amount of time required of Hudson United Bancorp directors. The responsibilities of Audit, Executive, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance committees of the Board have increased significantly. Consequently, directors have beenrequired to devote significantly more time on Board matters, including expanded oversight of financial reporting and regulatory compliance matters, frequent consultations, and multi-day educational and planning meetings. 

 

Accordingly, in the third quarter of 2003, the Compensation Committee recommended and theBoard adopted a revised Board Compensation structure which provides for an annual retainer of $45,000 for directors of the holding company and $30,000 for directors of the bank. In addition, the chairperson of the Audit Committee is paid an annualretainer of $55,000 and the chairperson of other committees is paid an annual retainer of $35,000. Members of the Audit Committee are paid additional annual retainers of $40,000 and members of other committees are paid additional annual retainers of$20,000. Board members are also paid $3,000 for each meeting, $1,500 for each committee meeting and $500 for participation in each Board meetings by conference call. Retainers and fees are only paid to outside directors. Directors receive noreimbursement for out of pocket expenses.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 17, 2011

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST ARKANSAS BANCSHARES, INC. | 4c8            | First Arkansas BancShares, Inc., Jacksonville, Arkansas, to acquire 33 percent of FAS Capital, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, and thereby engage in lending activities.     | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | Not available 
|FIRST ARKANSAS BANCSHARES, INC. | 4c8            | First Arkansas BancShares, Inc., Jacksonville, Arkansas, to increase its ownership in BVCA, LLC, from 18 percent to 100 percent, and continue to engage in lending. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1242.22 Shop buildings—locomotives (account XX-19-24).

Separate common expenses according to distribution of common expenses in the following accounts:

Machinery Repair (XX-26-40)

Locomotive—Repair and Maintenance (XX-26-41)
Exhibit 32.2



EXHIBIT 32.2

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James A. McNulty   
|James A. McNulty       
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 23, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00547-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.T., A CHILD,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PA01326

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which 

must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX.

R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Appellant’s brief was filed on November 3, 2016, making appellee’s brief 

due November 23, 2016. The appellee filed a motion for extension of time requesting a twentyday extension to file its brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief must be filed no later 

than December 13, 2016. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, 

further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
T2 EVAP PHASE-IN
0.40  0.80  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  
0.40  0.80  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  
0.40  0.80  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  
0.40  0.80  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  
0.40  0.80  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00
#### § 178.318-3 Marking.

Each container must be marked as prescribed in § 178.2(b).

[Amdt. 178-40, 41 FR 38181, Sept. 9, 1976, as amended at 66 FR 45185, Aug. 28, 2001]
#### § 1242.21 Station and office buildings (account XX-19-23).

If the sum of the direct freight and the direct passenger expenses is more than 50 percent of the total charges to this account for an accounting division, separate the common expenses on the basis of the directly assigned expenses in this account for the accounting division involved. If the sum of the direct freight and the direct passenger expenses does not aggregate to more than 50 percent of the total charges for an accounting division, the common expenses should be separated on the basis of special test. Where common expenses exist in an accounting division but the direct expenses are applicable to only one service, i.e., freight or passenger, the common expenses shall be separated on the basis of a special test. If the accounting is performed on a system basis rather than by accounting divisions, the common expenses shall be separated on the basis of a special study.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory A. Wells, Chief Financial
Officer of NTS Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS- Properties Associates, the
general partner of NTS-Properties III (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended March
               31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 13, 2004

/s/ Gregory A. Wells

---

Chief Financial Officer of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates,
General Partner of NTS-Properties III

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 3, 2013

|Filer             | Filing Type                      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|DELANCO, MHC      | * SLHC Formation* MHC Conversion | Delanco, MHC, Delanco, NJ, proposes to convert to stock form and merge with and into Delanco Bancorp, Inc., Delanco, New Jersey, which proposes to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring Delanco Federal Savings Bank, Delanco, NJ. | Newspaper:07/11/2013Federal Register:07/15/2013
|Newspaper:        | 07/11/2013                      
|Federal Register: | 07/15/2013                      

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1103.18 Withdrawal from employment.

The right of a practitioner to withdraw from employment, once begun, arises only from good cause. The desire or consent of the client is not always sufficient cause for withdrawal. The practitioner shall not abandon the unfinished task to the detriment of the client except for reasons of honor, or the client's persistence over the practitioner's remonstrance in presenting frivolous defenses, or the client's deliberate disregard of an obligation as to fees or expenses. In these cases, the practitioner may be warranted in withdrawing after due notice to the client with time allowed for the employment of another practitioner. Other reasons for withdrawal might include instances in which a practitioner discovers that his client has no cause and the client is determined to continue the cause, or the practitioner's own inability to conduct a case effectively. Upon withdrawing from a case, the practitioner shall refund any part of a retainer which clearly has not been earned.
<PAGE>



                                                                Exhibit 99.2(v)


Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                      CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2000-S5

Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1,
2000 between Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation, Servicer and Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation hereby provides the following Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof,

/s/ Lucy P. Gambino                    /s/ Susan Christman
------------------------               -----------------------------------
Lucy P. Gambino                        Susan Christman
Vice President                         Assistant Treasurer





Certified March 13, 2001

345
#### § 1242.46 Computers and data processing equipment (account XX-27-46).

If the sum of the direct freight and the direct passenger expenses is more than 50 percent of the total charges to this account for an accounting division, separate the common expenses on the basis of the directly assigned expenses in this account for the accounting division involved. If the sum of the direct freight and the direct passenger expenses does not aggregate 50 percent of the total charges for an accounting division, the common expenses shall be separated on the basis of a special test. If common expenses exist in an accounting division but the direct expenses are applicable to only one service, i.e., freight or passenger, the common expenses shall be separated on the basis of a special test. If the accounting is performed on a system basis rather than by accounting divisions, follow the intent of the above instructions.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending June 2, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location              | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF GUEYDAN, GUEYDAN, LOUISIANA | 603232 | 06/28/2011 | 05/20/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1878

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 18, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

To extend for 4 years the period of applicability of enrollment

mix requirement to certain health maintenance organizations providing services under Dayton Area Health Plan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1878 RFS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENDING PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY OF EN2 ROLLMENT MIX REQUIREMENT TO CERTAIN

3 HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS

4 PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER DAYTON AREA

5 HEALTH PLAN.

6 Section 2 of Public Law 102–276, as amended by sec7 tion 13644 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

8 1993, is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 1995’’ and

9 inserting ‘‘December 31, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 18

(legislative day, December 15), 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
**Map Collections**

----

[Rights and Reproductions]

----

**Greece, administrative divisions.**

United States. Central Intelligence Agency.

**CREATED/PUBLISHED** [Washington, D.C. : Central Intelligence Agency, 2010]

**NOTES**"803449AI (G02691) 10-10." 

Shows county-level administrative divisions (nomes) and administrative centers. 

Includes notes and location map. 

 Scale 1:5,700,000 ; Lambert conformal conic proj., standard parallels 34�53'N and 41�46'N (E 19�--E 29�/N 42�--N 34�).

**SUBJECTS**Greece--Administrative and political divisions--Maps.Maps.Greece.

**MEDIUM**1 map : col. ; 21 x 17 cm.

**CALL NUMBER**G6811.F7 2010 .U5

**REPOSITORY**Library of Congress Geography and Map Division Washington, D.C. 20540-4650 USA 

**DIGITAL ID****g6811f****ct003217** http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/**g6811f**.**ct003217**

**PREVIOUS****NEXT****NEW SEARCH**
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending August 24, 2013

---





## Enforcement

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us