alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
800

800

800

800

800 800

900

800

900

800

800

800

ARIZONA

ARIZONA

ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

YUMA CO

YUMA CO

YUMA CO

Monument Bluff

Las

Playas

Pinta

Playa

Sierra

Arida

Monument

Bluff

Paradise

Canyon

35

46

45

35

49

47

35

35

35

35

3553

35

51

50

52

3555

35

3554

56

35

35

44

000mN

45

57

35

35

35

35

35

46

47

48

52

51

49

50

35

35

35

35

35

54

55

35

53

35

58

N

56

254 55 257 2 59

000m 3544

2 2 2 000m 2 62

2

2 63

255

53

54

61 2

53 256 257 258 2 2 63 2 000m 59 60 261 2

000 FEET

000 FEET

740

770

5'

000

FEET

2'30"

400

FEET

30"

32'30"

5'

2'

37' 32'

113°

30"

37'

113° 30" 30'

07'30" 32° 30"

30" 113°

32°

113°

07'

32° 32°

30'

00 00' '

3548

370000

35'

35'

E

E

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ARIZONA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MONUMENT BLUFF, AZ-SON

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

MONUMENT BLUFF QUADRANGLE

ARIZONA-SONORA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2003

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Arizona Coordinate System of 1983 (west

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

TA

12S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 22 ́

24 MILS

11° 12 ́

199 MILS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 1, 2014

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 178.318-1 Scope. ( a ) This specification pertains to a container to be used for the transportation of detonators and percussion caps in connection with the transportation of liquid nitroglycerin, desensitized liquid nitroglycerin or diethylene glycol dinitrate, where any or all of such types of caps may be used for the detonation of liquid nitroglycerin, desentitized liquid nitroglycerin or diethylene glycol dinitrate in blasting operations. This specification is not intended to take the place of any shipping or packing requirements of this Department where the caps in question are themselves articles of commerce.
( b ) [Reserved]
[29 FR 18975, Dec. 29, 1964. Redesignated at 32 FR 5606, Apr. 5, 1967, and amended by Amdt. 178-60, 44 FR 70733, Dec. 10, 1979]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 28, 1995 (88), Para 88.55 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1065]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.88.55  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

                     [Submitted Wednesday, June 28]

       Mr. SOLOMON: Committee on Rules. H. Res. 175. A resolution 
     waiving points of order against the conference report to 
     accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) setting 
     forth the congressional budget for the United States 
     Government for fiscal years, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 
     2001, and 2002 (Rept. No. 104-165). Referred to the House 
     Calendar.
       Mr. DREIER: Committee on Rules. H. Res. 176. A resolution 
     providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1944) 
     making emergency supplemental appropriations for additional 
     disaster assistance, for anti-terrorism initiatives, for 
     assistance in the recovery from the tragedy that occurred at 
     Oklahoma City, and making rescissions for the fiscal year 
     ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 
     104-166). Referred to the House Calendar.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, July 20, 1995 (98), Para 98.15 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1164]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.98.15  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. CASTLE:

       Page 25, line 20, strike ``$805,888,000'' and insert 
     ``802,888,000''.
       Page 31, line 19, strike $629,986,000'' and insert 
     $612,986,000''.
       Page 40, line 10, before ``for loans'' insert ``(plus 
     $200,000,000)''.
       Page 40, line 20, before ``, of which'' insert ``(plus 
     $40,000,000)''.
       Page 57, line 20, strike ``$821,100,000'' and insert 
     ``$801,100,000''. 

It was decided in the

Yeas

96

negative

Nays

332
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.25 Petitions, Etc.]
[Page 822]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.25  petitions, etc.

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       22. The SPEAKER presented a petition of the Legislature of 
     Rockland County, NY, relative to condemning the attack on the 
     Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City; which was 
     referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 16, 1995 (46), Para 46.23 Adjournment]
[Pages 414-415]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.46.23  adjournment

  On motion of Mrs. SCHROEDER, pursuant to the provisions of House 
Concurrent Resolution 41, at 4 o'clock and 29 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 21, 1995.

[[Page 415]]
```
#### Kimball *v.*Holmes.

In trespass for injuring the plaintiff’s horse, if the award of damages is enhanced beyond the actual material damages sustained because the act was accompanied with malice, it will not for that reason be open to the objection that it exposes the defendant to double punishment, if only full compensation is awarded.

*164Trespass, for beating and injuring tbe plaintiff’s mare witb an axe. Tbe action was defaulted, and referred to a referee to assess tbe damages, wbo reported that tbe defendant committed tbe injury as alleged, and accompanied tbe act witb sucb malicious insults as should enhance tbe damages, and awarded that tbe plaintiff *recover the*sum of forty dollars. The mare before tbe injury was lame, and of small value. Tbe court ordered judgment on tbe report, and tbe defendant excepted.

*E. Fletcher*and *Benton*Hutchins, for tbe defendant.

*Bay, Brew Sf Jordan,*for tbe plaintiff.

Smith, J.

In a civil action founded on a tort, nothing but compensatory damages can be awarded, but tbe injured party is entitled to full compensation for all the injury sustained, mental as well as material. In some cases, compensation for tbe actual material damage sustained will be full compensation. In other cases, tbe material damages may be trivial, and tbe principal injury be to tbe wounded feelings from tbe insult, degradation, and other aggravating circumstances attending tbe act. Tbe recent cases of *Fay*v. *Parker,*53 N. H. 342, and *Bixby*v. *Dunlap,*56 N. H. 456, may be regarded as settling tbe law on this subject in this state. Tbe award, as we construe it, compensates tbe plaintiff for tbe -damage be has sustained by tbe injury to bis property, and for bis mental damage by reason of tbe defendant’s malice; and there is nothing in tbe award that shows that it was intended as a punishment for violation ‘of criminal law.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: tbe others concurred.
#### * Jared Burchard and others, *Respondents, v.*Reuben Hale, *Appellant.*

*

**Decision in this and the following cases, to end of memoranda, handed dofvn July, 1883.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion granted with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
Exhibit 10.8



General Release



To all to whom these Presents shall come or may Concern, Know That Biovest International, Inc., Biotech Building 4, 377 Plantation Street, Worcester MA
01605 as RELEASOR, in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, received from Dr. Robert D. Pfeffer, as RELEASEE, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, releases and discharges RELEASEE,
his affiliates, divisions, licensees, receivers, distributors, successors and assigns, his heirs, executors, administrators, attorneys, associates, agents, and anyone affiliated with or acting on behalf of any of them (collectively, the
RELEASED PARTIES) from all actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages,
judgments, extents, executions, claims, and demands whatsoever, in law, admiralty or equity, which against the RELEASEE and the RELEASED PARTIES, the RELEASOR, RELEASORS attorneys, associates, agents, successors, assigns, heirs, parent or
subsidiary corporations, and anyone affiliated with or acting on behalf of any of them, ever had, now have or hereafter can, shall or may have, from the beginning of the world to the day of the date of this RELEASE.



The words RELEASOR and RELEASEES include all
releasors and all releasees under this RELEASE.



This RELEASE
may not be changed orally.



In Witness Whereof, the RELEASORS
have hereunto set RELEASORS hands and seals on the  day of February 2006



Executed and delivered in presence of



Biovest International, Inc.By:James McNulty, Chief Financial Officer




ACKNOWLEDGMENT



On
, 2006 before me personally came Sam Duffey, to me known, who, by me duly sworn, did depose and
say that deponent is the General Counsel of Biovest International, Inc., the corporation described in, and which executed the foregoing General Release, that deponent knows the seal of the corporation, that the seal affixed to the General Release is
the corporate seal, that it was affixed by order of the Board of Directors of the corporation and that deponent signed deponents name by like order.



|             
|-------------
|             
|Notary Public
#### Benjamin Taishoff et al., Doing Business as Taishoff Bros., Respondents, *v.*Nathan Coyne et al., Appellants.

*Taishoff v. Coyne,*141 App. Div. —, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted January 16, 1911;

decided January 24, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 18, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for labor and materials furnished;

The motion was made on the ground that the appeal was frivolous, no question of law being involved.

*Abraham B. Schleimer*for motion.

*Hyman Lurio*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 26, 2013

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|---------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FINANCIAL FEDERAL BANK | * Branch       | Financial Federal Bank, Memphis, Tennessee, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1715 Aaron Brenner Drive, Memphis, Tennessee. | Newspaper:11/05/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | 11/05/2013    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Michael C. Mayer, certify that: 1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the
registrant); 2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report: 3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report: 4.) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13-a-15 (e) and
15d-15 (e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a.)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared:  b.)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on such
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.  c.)
    Disclosed in this report any change in internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
internal control over financial reporting; and 5.) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:  a.)
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls: and  b.)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. /s/MICHAEL C. MAYER Michael C. Mayer
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) Dated May 05, 2005 30
-----Original Message----- 

From: sheryl@igc.org [mailto:sheryl@igc.org] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Sheryl Kaplan 

1457 N Catalina Ave 

Pasadena, CA 91104
98-2449.

#### State v. Issa.

Hamilton C.P. B9709438. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that appellant’s motion for stay of execution be, and hereby is, granted, pending disposition of this appeal.
H. R. 1787

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to repeal the saccharin notice

requirement.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTICE REQUIREMENT REPEAL.

Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is amended by striking paragraph (p).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 1500.5 Rules of construction. ( a ) In this chapter, unless the context requires otherwise: ( 1 ) Words importing the singular include the plural.
( 2 ) Words importing the plural include the singular.
( 3 ) Words importing the masculine gender include the feminine.
( b ) In this chapter, the word: ( 1 ) “Must” is used in an imperative sense;
( 2 ) “May” is used in a permissive sense to state authority or permission to do the act prescribed, and the words “no person may * * *” or “a person may not * * *” mean that no person is required, authorized, or permitted to do the act prescribed; and
( 3 ) “Includes” means “includes but is not limited to”.
98-2093.

#### State ex rel. Cyclops Corp./Empire Detroit Steel Div. v. Conrad.

In Mandamus. *Sua sponte,*alternative writ granted,
§ 1548.17 Known shipper program. This section applies to cargo that an indirect air carrier offers to an aircraft operator operating under a full program under § 1544.101(a) of this chapter, or to a foreign air carrier operating under § 1546.101(a) or (b) of this chapter. ( a ) For cargo to be loaded on aircraft in the United States, each indirect air carrier must have and carry out a known shipper program in accordance with its security program. The program must— ( 1 ) Determine the shipper's validity and integrity as provided in its security program;
( 2 ) Provide that the indirect air carrier will separate known shipper cargo from unknown shipper cargo.
( b ) When required by TSA, each indirect air carrier must submit to TSA, in a form and manner acceptable to TSA— ( 1 ) Information identified in its security program regarding an applicant to be a known shipper or a known shipper; and
( 2 ) Corrections and updates of this information upon learning of a change to the information specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
[71 FR 30516, May 26, 2006]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.11 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1116]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.11  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. VOLKMER:

       Page 16, Line 1 insert ``(less $8,000,000)'' before ``to 
     remain''. 

It was decided in the

Yeas

148

negative

Nays

275
```