alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
c:laAwi*‘d)l~H3 CL xd.4srlwI~ 

ArrsTrcN. TEXAS anal1 

A%-rOKSKY C,lcNERAI. November 4, 1970 

Honorable Bill McCoy Opinion No. M-718 

County Attorney 

Ector County Courthouse Re: Whether a County CommisOdessa, Texas 79760 sioner has vacated his 

office by moving from the 

precinct from which he was 

Dear Mr. McCoy: 

elected to office to another 

part of the county. 

By recent letter you have requested an opinion from this 

office in regard to the above stated matter. We quote from 

your letter as follows: 

"One of our County Commissioners desires to 

move to a new location in the county. This new 

location is outside of the precinct in which he 

was duly elected as a County Commissioner. My 

specific inquiry is this: 

"(a) Does this commissioner automatically 

vacate his office if and when he moves to this 

new location in the county? 

"(b) Can he still hold office as commissioner 

in the precinct in which he was elected even if he 

moves into another precinct in the county?" 

Your conclusion is that, based upon an analysis of Harrison 

v. Chesshir, 316 S.W.2d 909 (Tex.Civ.App., 1958, rev. on other 

grounds, 159 T. 359, 320 S.W.2d 814, 19591, and Whitmarsh v. 

Buckley, 324S.W.2d 298 (Tex.Civ.App., 1959 no writ) the Commissioner does not vacate his office, and thus may elect to 

continue to serve the remainder of his present term. 

We agree. 

-3475- 
Hon. Bill McCoy, page 2 

A County Commissioner 

represent the interest of 

(M-718) 

is a county officer, elected to 

the county, and does not automatically 

vacate his office by moving to another part of the county outside 

the precinct from which he was elected. Childress County v. Sachse, 

158 Tex. 271, 312 S.W.2d 380 (1958); Whitmarsh v. Buckley, 324 S.W.Zd 

298 (Tex.Civ.App., 1959, no writ); Attorney General's Opinion No. 

O-6905 (1945). 

SUMMARY 

A County Commissioner does not vacate his 

office automatically just because he moves 

his residence to another part of the county, and 

said Commissioner may continue to serve his term. 

General of Texas 

Prepared by James C. McCoy 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

Bob Lattimore 

John Banks 

Gordon Cass 

Harold Kennedy 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLA WHITE 

First Assistant 

-3476-
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 120 (Friday, June 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, July 20, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Enforcement Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-3090 Filed 6-20-07; 10:33 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, August 24, 2007. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100. 

Eileen A. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-3626 Filed 7-20-07; 11:20 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 13, 2012

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BROOKLINE BANK    | * Branch       | Application by Brookline Bank, Brookline, Massachusetts, to establish a full-service branch at 131 Clarendon Street, Boston, Massachusetts, pursuant to Section 208.6 of Regulation H. | Newspaper:10/19/2012Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 10/19/2012    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
-1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JONATHON WILLIAM-DURAND 

NEUHARD, 

Defendant. 

 /

Case No. 2:15-cr-20425 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

DAVID R. GRAND

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

EXCESS PAGES [37] AND STRIKING DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT’S

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE [38] 

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Excess 

Pages, seeking to allow a reply brief in excess of the seven page limit set by Local 

Rule 7.1(d)(3)(B). Dkt. No. 37. Defendant sought to file a brief of up to 15 pages, id., 

and filed a 14 page reply brief on January 22, 2016, prior to the Court’s ruling on this 

motion. See Dkt. No. 38. 

Defendant argues that an extension of the page limit is necessary to 

adequately address the legal issues raised in the government’s response. Dkt. No. 37, 

p. 1 (Pg. ID No. 125). Government counsel did not concur with Defendant’s 

requested extension. Id. at 2. 

2:15-cr-20425-GAD-DRG Doc # 40 Filed 01/26/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 145
-2- 

After reading Defendant’s motion, the Court will GRANT Defendant an 

extension of three pages to his reply brief, bringing it to a maximum of ten pages. 

Additionally, the Court disregards and HEREBY STRIKES Defendant’s Reply To 

Government’s Response To Defendant’s Motion To Suppress Evidence [38]. 

Defendant may file an amended reply, in accordance with the terms of this order, by 

Thursday, January 28, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 26, 2016 

 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

 United States District Court Judge 

2:15-cr-20425-GAD-DRG Doc # 40 Filed 01/26/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 146
98-1985.

#### State v. Hoffman.

Huron App. No. H-97-52. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1446, 703 N.E.2d 326. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, RFA-NR-07-002/3: Culturally Appropriate Research to Prevent HIV Transmission.                    

*Date:*                         March 14-15, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Crowne Plaza Hotel, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John E. Richters, PhD, Chief, Office of Review, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd. Room 715, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 594-5971,                         *jrichters@nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2007.

David Clary,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-360 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: Notice of Communication in case: 

Docket DOT -OST -2013-0204 

From: Victor Mendez 

Deputy Secretary of Transportation 

Date: 

JAN 23 2015 

Reply to Reese Davidson 

Attn. of: x68l6l 

To: Chief, Dockets 

In accordance with Department practice, I am reporting the following 

communication. 

During a meeting on January 21, 2015, the Norwegian Minister of Trade and 

Industry, Monica Maeland, raised the pending application of Norwegian Air 

International Limited (N AI) before DOT. 

Minister Maeland acknowledged that the matter is under the purview of the 

Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications, but noted that she is 

following the issue very closely and expressed her hope that it can be resolved 

soon. I replied that because NAI's application is part of an ongoing proceeding, I 

could not have a substantive discussion with her. 

Participants in the meeting from DOT: 

1. Victor Mendez, Deputy Secretary of Transportation 

2. Paul Jaenichen, Maritime Administrator 

3. Julie Abraham, Director, Office of International Transportation and Trade 

4. Lonnie Kishiyama, Director, Office of International Activities, MARAD 

5. Richard Corley, Office of International Activities, MARAD 

6. Kirsten Martin, Senior Maritime Safety & Security Advisor 

Please :Rlace this memorandum in Docket DOT -OST -2013-0204. 

Victor 

~#//(~ Mendez 

Deputy Secretary of Transportation 

cc: Minister Monica Maeland
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending September 21, 2013

----

Change in Bank Control            Anchor Commercial Bank, Juno Beach, Florida -- change in bank control of Anchor Commercial Bank.            -Permitted, September 17, 2013            Reserve Bank Operations            First Vice Presidents -- revisions to the Board's policy for evaluating and compensating Reserve Bank first vice presidents.            -Approved, September 3, 2013            (A/C)          Enforcement            JPMorgan Chase & Co., New York, New York -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.            -Announced, September 19, 2013                        The Missouri Bank, Warrenton, Missouri -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.            -Announced, September 17, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### Valentine Stein *v.*Conrad Stern.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered costs to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
SUPREME COURT.

#### James T. Foster agt. Jennie L. Hughes and others.

*New York, Special Term,*

*November,*1874.

*Action to foreclose mortgage*— *equitable defense mt&rposed—stay of proceedings oi’dered on motion.*

A court of equity will not allow itself to be used fraudulently, and can prevent inequitable consequences even in the exercise of a legal right. Where it appeared that the real object of a foreclosure suit was not to procure satisfaction of the debt but to assist a husband to coerce his wife, who owned the fee, to settle litigations between him and her, the court will prevent its process being thus abused.

In such a case, where the wife tendered to the mortgagee the amount of his debt—principal, interest and costs—and asked that the mortgagee assign the mortgage to some one designated by her, and the mortgagee refused, *held,*that proceedings in this action should be stayed.

Motion on behalf of the defendant Jennie L. Hughes for a stay of proceedings. The suit was brought to foreclose a mortgage. The defendant Jennie L. Hughes was the owner of the fee. She was a married woman, and was suing her husband to annul her marriage, on the ground that he had another wife at the time he married her. There were also several other suits between them respecting property. She tendered the plaintiff, who, she swore, was a friend of her husband, the amount — principal and interest — due upon the mortgage, and offered to pay the costs of the suit, and requested an assignment of the mortgage to a friend to be named by her. The plaintiff refused to make any assignment. The affidavits showed that the mortgage was being foreclosed in the interest of the husband, and that, in consequence of the litigations, and the *lis pendens*in this and *21other suits, she could not obtain a new mortgage; and there was evidence tending to show that the object of this suit was to coerce Mrs. Hughes to settle her litigations with her husband.

*Richard S. Newcombe,*attorney, and *Albert Cardozo,*of counsel, for motion.

*Charles*Jones, attorney and counsel for plaintiff, in opposition.

Donohue, J.

Courts of equity, or exercising equitable powers, will at all times prevent the improper use, even in a legal way, of their process, and have the power to prevent inequitable consequences of the assertion of even a legal right.

In this case it is clear to me that, while the denial of the plaintiff is made strongly, it is not true, but that, at the bottom, this mortgage is being used to obtain an end different from what is the right of the parties. On the payment of the plaintiff’s demand, with interest and costs, he will obtain all that the law or equity entitles him to, and there can be no excuse for him to refuse an assignment of the mortgage. Hpon making such tender to him, if he refuses to assign, his proceedings in this action are stayed.

Motion granted.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.33 Time Limitation on Referred Bill]
[Page 802]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.33  time limitation on referred bill

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1062. Referral to the Committee on Commerce extended 
     for a period ending not later than June 16, 1995.
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: jg@jasongarber.com [mailto:jg@jasongarber.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jason Garber 

949 College Ave # C 

Harrisonburg, VA 22802
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1936

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for certain minimum

requirements under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program

with respect to obstetrical benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 1995

Mr. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr.

SANDERS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr.

SCOTT, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. FLAKE, Ms. WOOLSEY,

Mrs. SCHROEDER, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. OWENS, Mr. STARK, Mr. EVANS,

Mr. FRAZER, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. NADLER, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government

Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for certain

minimum requirements under the Federal Employees

Health Benefits Program with respect to obstetrical benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTRACT REQUIREMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8902 of title 5, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

6 following:
2

•HR 1936 IH

1 ‘‘(o)(1) A contract under this chapter which provides

2 obstetrical benefits may not be approved unless it provides

3 coverage for at least—

4 ‘‘(A) 48 hours of inpatient care following a vag5 inal delivery, and

6 ‘‘(B) 96 hours of inpatient care following a de7 livery by caesarean section,

8 for the mother and her newborn child in a licensed hos9 pital.

10 ‘‘(2)(A) Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the contract

11 provides coverage for post-delivery care which satisfies

12 subparagraph (B).

13 ‘‘(B) In order to satisfy this subparagraph—

14 ‘‘(i) the post-delivery care must consist of at

15 least 3 home visits by a registered professional nurse

16 with at least 3 years of experience in community ma17 ternal and child health nursing;

18 ‘‘(ii) the post-delivery care must include parent

19 education, assistance and training in breast or bottle

20 feeding, and the performance of any necessary and

21 appropriate maternal and neonatal physical assess22 ments; and

23 ‘‘(iii) the first home visit must take place within

24 such period of time as the Office shall by regulation

25 prescribe, except that, if the delivery is in a hospital,
3

•HR 1936 IH

1 such visit must take place within 24 hours after the

2 mother and her newborn child have been dis3 charged.’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered

6 into for any contract year beginning at least 6 months

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 176.180 Watchkeeping.

Whenever Class 1 (explosive) materials are on board a vessel in port, there must be sufficient crew on board to maintain a proper watch and to operate the propulsion and firefighting equipment in case of an emergency.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending August 29, 2009

----

EnforcementLegacyTexas Group, Inc., Plano, Texas, and LegacyTexas Bank  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and the Texas Department of Banking.					-Announced, August 27, 2009 					Virginia Business Bank, Richmond, Virginia  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions.					-Announced, August 25, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Auction Facility  -- reduction in the TAF auction amounts to $75 billion in 84-day credit on September 8 and $75 billion in 28-day credit on September 21, 2009.					-Announced, August 28, 2009 					Term Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $100 billion in 28-day credit on August 24, 2009.					-Announced, August 24, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulations H and Y  -- publication for comment of interagency proposals to revise the risk-based capital adequacy standards (1) to eliminate the exclusion of certain consolidated asset-backed commercial paper programs from risk-weighted assets and (2) to reserve authority, for risk-based capital purposes, to require banking organizations to treat entities that are not consolidated under accounting standards as if they were consolidated.					-Announced, August 26, 2009 					System Lending Facilities  -- fifth periodic report to Congress, required by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, on lending facilities authorized under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act.					-Approved, August 26, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: September 3, 2009