alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending February 9, 2013

|Filer                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FULL SERVICE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. | CIC           | Change in Control notice by Richard Lee Newman, Mayville, North Dakota, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of Full Service Insurance Agency Inc., Buxton, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of First State Bank, Buxton, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                   | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 22, 1995 (70), Para 70.8 Senate Bill Referred]
[Page 804]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.70.8  senate bill referred

  A bill of the Senate of the following title was taken from the 
Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S. 184. An Act to establish an Office for Rare Disease 
     Research in the National Institutes of Health, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Commerce.

  And then,
```
#### § 1103.11 Standards of ethical conduct in courts of the United States to be observed.

These canons further the purpose of the Board's Rules of Practice which direct all persons appearing in proceedings before it to conform, as nearly as possible, to the standards of ethical conduct required of practice before the courts of the United States. Such standards are taken as the basis for these specifications and are modified as the nature of the practice before the Board requires.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 01-205 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CLAIMS 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FRANCE 

Signed at Washington January 18, 2001 

with 

Annexes 

and 

Agreement Amending the Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Letters at 

Paris May 30 and 31, 2002 

and 

Agreement Amending the Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Letters at 

Paris February 21, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 FRANCE 

 

 Claims 

 Agreement signed at Washington January 18, 2001; 

 Entered into force February 5, 2001. 

 With annexes. 

 And agreement amending the agreement. 

 Effected by exchange of letters at Paris 

 May 30 and 31, 2002; 

 Entered into force May 31, 2002. 

 And agreement amending the agreement. 

 Effected by exchange of letters at Paris 

 February 21, 2006; 

 Entered into force February 21, 2006. 

















NOTE: This is an unofficial translation provided by the Government of France. When the official English translation becomes availab

added to this publication.
98-1855.

#### Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 83 v. Union Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Belmont App. No. 97-BA-40.

Moyer, C.J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. III.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 24, 2012

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANQUE CENTRALE POPULAIRE | FBSEA          | Banque Centrale Populaire, Casablanca, Morocco, to establish a representative office in Washington, D.C. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF MCKENNEY, MCKENNEY, VIRGINIA          | 746429 | 08/06/2012 | 11/11/2012     | S         | Small Bank 
|BANK OF ROMNEY, ROMNEY, WEST VIRGINIA         | 722432 | 07/23/2012 | 10/25/2012     | O         | Small Bank 
|FARMERS & MINERS BK, PENNINGTON GAP, VIRGINIA | 658924 | 07/30/2012 | 11/08/2012     | S         | Small Bank 
|SANDY SPRING BK, OLNEY, MARYLAND              | 506922 | 05/21/2012 | 10/25/2012     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2013 (January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 176.74 On deck stowage of break-bulk hazardous materials. ( a ) Packages containing hazardous materials must be secured by enclosing in boxes, cribs or cradles and proper lashing by use of wire rope, strapping or other means, including shoring and bracing, or both. Lashing of deck cargo is permitted if eye pads are used to attach the lashings. Lashings may not be secured to guard rails. Bulky articles must be shored.
( b ) A packaging susceptible to weather or water damage must be protected so that it will not be exposed to the weather or to sea water.
( c ) Not more than fifty percent of the total open deck area should be used for stowage of hazardous materials (except Class 9 (miscellaneous hazardous material).
( d ) Fireplugs, hoses, sounding pipes, and access to these must be free and clear of all cargo.
( e ) Crew and passenger spaces and areas set aside for the crew's use may not be used to stow any hazardous material.
( f ) A hazardous material may not be stowed within a horizontal distance of 25 feet of an operating or embarkation point of a lifeboat.
( g ) Hazardous materials must be stowed to permit safe access to the crew's quarters and to all parts of the deck required in navigation and necessary working of the vessel.
( h ) When runways for use of the crew are built over stowed hazardous materials, they must be constructed and fitted with rails and lifelines so as to afford complete protection to the crew when in use.
[Amdt. 176-1, 41 FR 16110, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 176-1B, 41 FR 57072, Dec. 30, 1976; Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52689, Dec. 21, 1990; 56 FR 66282, Dec. 20, 1991; 66 FR 45181, Aug. 28, 2001]
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*The Board of Trustees of the Village of Flushing.

Order, affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 22, 1995 (85), Para 85.32 Message from the President]
[Page 1039]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.85.32  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.
```
Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection with the Annual Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jiang Peng, Chairman of the Board of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 3, 2009
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Jiang PengJiang PengChairman of the Board   In connection with the Annual Report of Great China International  Holdings,  Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ending  December 31,  2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Sun Dongqing,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 3, 2009
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Sun DongqingSun DongqingChief Financial Officer A signed  original of this written  statement  required by  Section 906  has been  provided to Great China
International  Holdings,  Inc.  and will be retained  by Great  China  International  Holdings,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 10.45 Statement of disagreement.

If a determination is made not to amend a record, the requester is informed of the right to file a concise statement setting forth the reasons for disagreement with the refusal to amend. In any disclosure containing information about which an individual has filed such a statement of disagreement, the portions of the record which are disputed are noted clearly and copies of the statement of disagreement provided. If the Administrator concerned or his or her delegee, or in the case of the Office of the Secretary, the General Counsel or his or her delegee, deems it appropriate, copies of a concise statement of the reasons for not making the amendments requested may be provided along with the statement of disagreement.
#### Adelaide B. Lampman, *Respondent, v.*James Adams, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Landon, J.;

Learned, P. J., not acting.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the registrant);2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Patrick J. Moty
Patrick J. MotyPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: November 7, 2008
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randi Swatt, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: October 23, 2008



| |                                                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/RANDI SWATT                                                   
| | Randi Swatt                                                      
| | Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1847

To authorize appropriations to develop technologies that can be used to

combat terrorism, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1995

Mrs. SCHROEDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize appropriations to develop technologies that can

be used to combat terrorism, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Counterterrorism

5 Technology Research Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TO SUPPORT

7 COUNTERTERRORISM TECHNOLOGIES.

8 There are authorized to be appropriated not to exceed

9 $20,000,000 to the National Institute of Justice Science

10 and Technology Office in the Department of Justice—
2

•HR 1847 IH

1 (1) to develop technologies that can be used to

2 combat terrorism, including technologies in the areas

3 of—

4 (A) detection of weapons, explosives,

5 chemicals, and persons;

6 (B) tracking;

7 (C) surveillance;

8 (D) vulnerability assessment; and

9 (E) information technologies;

10 (2) to develop standards to ensure the adequacy

11 of products produced and compatibility with relevant

12 national systems; and

13 (3) to identify and assess requirements for tech14 nologies to assist State and local law enforcement in

15 the national program to combat terrorism.

Æ
*Monday, December*7, *1998*

MOTION DOCKET

96-2311.

#### State v. Keenan.

Cuyahoga App. No. 67452. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, pursuant to *State v. Glenn*(1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 601, 514 N.E.2d 869, a stay is granted for a period of six months, beginning October 23, 1998 and ending April 23, 1999, to allow appellant an opportunity to file a petition for post-conviction relief. If a petition for post-conviction relief is not filed within the time allotted, this stay will expire. No *1426further time for the filing of the petition will be granted except in unusual circumstances.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within the time allotted, a date-stamped copy of the petition shall be filed by appellant with the Clerk of this court, and this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed for the six-month period allotted by this order and, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within the time allotted, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before the courts of this state.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post>conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 8, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                      | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|AUBURNBANK, AUBURN, ALABAMA                 | 749635 | 08/16/2010 | 12/26/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FIRST FARMERS & MRCH B, COLUMBIA, TENNESSEE | 150035 | 09/13/2010 | 01/03/2011     | O         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00680-CV

———————————

ELIZABETH COPELAND, Appellant

V.

BARRY COPELAND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-39055

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 12, 2015, appellant was notified of intent to dismiss this appeal 

for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief by March 6, 2015. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). One further extension (appellant’s fifth extension) was granted 

to March 11, 2015. To date, no appellate brief has been received. 
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, 

appellant’s failure to file a proper appellate brief and this Court’s notice, is of the 

opinion this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(a).

We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.