alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.25-60 Safety relief valves. ( a ) Each tank shall be fitted with two or more approved safety relief valves, designed, constructed, and flow-tested for capacity in conformance with subpart 162.018 of subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter.
( b ) Each safety relief valve shall start to discharge at a pressure not in excess of the design pressure of the tank.
( c ) Safety relief valves shall be attached to the tank near the highest point of the vapor space. Shutoff valves shall not be installed between the tanks and the safety relief valves, except manifolds for mounting multiple safety relief valves may be fitted with acceptable interlocking three-way valves so arranged at all times as to permit at any position of the three-way valve, an unrestricted flow of vapors through at least one port. When two safety relief valves are mounted in parallel on both the upper outlets of the three-way valve, the arrangement shall be such as to permit at least one safety relief valve to be operative at all times.
( d ) Each safety valve shall be tested in the presence of a marine inspector at the site of installation before or after mounting prior to being placed in service. The tests shall prove that the safety relief valve will start to discharge at a pressure not in excess of the maximum allowable pressure of the tank.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18902, Dec. 18, 1968]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 16, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1928

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require that the motor vehicle

bumper standard established by the Secretary of Transportation shall

be restored to that in effect January 1, 1982.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 1995

Mr. BEILENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require that

the motor vehicle bumper standard established by the

Secretary of Transportation shall be restored to that

in effect January 1, 1982.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 30111 of title 49, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

5 subsection:

6 ‘‘(f)(1) Not later than one year after the date of en7 actment of this subsection, the Secretary shall amend the

8 bumper standard contained in sections 581.1 through
2

•HR 1928 IH

1 581.7 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to ensure

2 that, except as provided in paragraph (2), such standard

3 is identical to the bumper standard under such sections

4 which was in effect on January 1, 1982. The amended

5 standard shall apply to all passenger automobiles begin6 ning with the model year after the date of amendment of

7 the standard.

8 ‘‘(2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to

9 prohibit the Secretary from requiring impact speeds under

10 such sections higher than the impact speed contained in

11 such amended standard.’’.

Æ
§ 172.516 Visibility and display of placards. ( a ) Each placard on a motor vehicle and each placard on a rail car must be clearly visible from the direction it faces, except from the direction of another transport vehicle or rail car to which the motor vehicle or rail car is coupled. This requirement may be met by the placards displayed on the freight containers or portable tanks loaded on a motor vehicle or rail car.
( b ) The required placarding of the front of a motor vehicle may be on the front of a truck-tractor instead of or in addition to the placarding on the front of the cargo body to which a truck-tractor is attached.
( c ) Each placard on a transport vehicle, bulk packaging, freight container or aircraft unit load device must— ( 1 ) Be securely attached or affixed thereto or placed in a holder thereon. (See appendix C to this part.);
( 2 ) Be located clear of appurtenances and devices such as ladders, pipes, doors, and tarpaulins;
( 3 ) So far as practicable, be located so that dirt or water is not directed to it from the wheels of the transport vehicle;
( 4 ) Be located away from any marking (such as advertising) that could substantially reduce its effectiveness, and in any case at least 3 inches (76.0 mm.) away from such marking;
( 5 ) Have the words or identification number (when authorized) printed on it displayed horizontally, reading from left to right;
( 6 ) Be maintained by the carrier in a condition so that the format, legibility, color, and visibility of the placard will not be substantially reduced due to damage, deterioration, or obscurement by dirt or other matter;
( 7 ) Be affixed to a background of contrasting color, or must have a dotted or solid line outer border which contrasts with the background color.
( d ) Recommended specifications for a placard holder are set forth in appendix C of this part. Except for a placard holder similar to that contained in appendix C to this part, the means used to attach a placard may not obscure any part of its surface other than the borders.
( e ) A placard or placard holder may be hinged provided the required format, color, and legibility of the placard are maintained.
[Amdt. 172-29, 41 FR 15996, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 172-101, 45 FR 74668, Nov. 10, 1980; Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52601, Dec. 21, 1990; 65 FR 50460, Aug. 18, 2000]
<PAGE>
 
Price Waterhouse LLP         
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-88174) of our report dated March 24, 1998
appearing on page 25 of Brookstone, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10K for the
year ended January 31, 1998. We also consent to the application of such report
to the Financial Statement Schedules for the three years ended January 31, 1998
listed in Item 14(a)(2) of such Annual Report on Form 10-K when such schedules
are read in conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our report.
The audits referred to in such report also included these schedules.


/s/Price Waterhouse LLP
Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
May 1, 1998
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

AUGUST 14, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD33128

Re: CARLA BOSTICK, Appellant,

vs. KEN WALLER, Respondent.

2. Case No. SD32876

Re: MIKE SCHILLING, MARLA MARANTZ, LOUELLA HARLAMER T, and PHYLLIS NETZER, Appellants,

vs. LIFE360 CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD, INC., ROB ERT W. BUCHANAN, and JENNIFER M. BUCHANAN, CITY OF SPRINGF IELD, MISSOURI; BRENDA CIRTIN, City Clerk; BOB STEPHENS, Mayor; JEFF SEIFRIED, City Council Member; CINDY RUSHEFSKY , City Council Member; JERRY COMPTON, City Council Member; CRAIG FISHEL, City Council Member; JAN FISK, City Council Member; CRAIG HOSMER, City Council Member; and MIKE CARROLL, City Council
Member, Respondents.

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).

1. Case No. SD32896

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs. DARNELL D. WARDINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.15 Recorded Vote]
[Page 637]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.15  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. TRAFICANT:

       Strike Sec. 104 and insert in lieu thereof:

     SEC. 104. PROHIBITION ON SMALL BOAT STATION CLOSURES.

       (a) The Secretary may not use amounts appropriated under 
     the authority of this Act to close any multimission small 
     boat station.
       (b) The Secretary may implement management efficiencies 
     within the small boat unit system, such as modifying the 
     operational posture of the units or reallocating resources as 
     necessary to ensure the safety of the maritime public, 
     provided that there are adequate active duty and reserve 
     Coast Guard personnel to perform search and rescue missions 
     at existing small boat units.

It was decided in the

Yeas

146

negative

Nays

272
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending April 20, 2013

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ADIRONDACK BANK   | * Branch       | Adirondack Bank, Utica, New York, requests to establish a branch located at 808 Main Street, Sylvan Beach, New York, Oneida County. | Newspaper:04/22/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/22/2013    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 7, 2012

|Filer                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BISCAYNE BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Prior change in control notice filed by George Michael Schweitzer, Miami, Florida, to acquire up to 1.26 percent of the outstanding shares of Biscayne Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, Biscayne Bank, both of Coconut Grove, Florida. Total pro forma ownership will equal 12.85 percent. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/25/2012
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 01/25/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ALIANT BK, ALEXANDER CITY, ALABAMA | 861434 | 05/16/2011 | 11/17/2011     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-2484.

#### Shelar v. Shelar.

Lucas App. No. L-97-1399. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1751

WILLIAM SANFORD GADD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY J. THORSON; NADINE THORSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-99-1145-1)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Sanford Gadd, Appellant Pro Se. McGinnis Edward Hatfield,

Jr., Bluefield, West Virginia; Gil Shuga, Chandler, Arizona, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Sanford Gadd appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Gadd v. Thorson, No. CA-99-1145-1 (S.D.W. Va.

May 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39740-39741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

32 CFR Part 650


Environmental Protection and Enhancement

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule; removal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action removes 32 CFR part 650, Environmental Protection 
and Enhancement, published in the Federal Register, December 29, 1977 
(42 FR 65026). The rule is being removed because it is now obsolete and 
does not affect the general public.

DATES: Effective July 20, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the 
Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, ATTN: DAIM-ED, 
600 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-0600.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Douglas Warnock, (703) 601-1573.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff 
for Installation Management, is the proponent for the regulation 
represented in 32 CFR part 650, and has concluded this regulation is 
obsolete. This regulation has been extensively revised and has been 
determined that the procedures prescribed in the regulation are for 
Army officials, and not intended to be enforced against any member of

[[Page 39741]]

the public. As a result, the regulation does not affect the general 
public. Therefore, it would be helpful in avoiding confusion with the 
public if 32 CFR part 650, is removed.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 650

    Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Federal buildings 
and facilities, Hazardous substances, Historic preservation, Noise 
control, Waste treatment and disposal, Water pollution control.

PART 650--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, for reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority of 
10 U.S.C. 3012, 32 CFR part 650, Environmental Protection and 
Enhancement, is removed in its entirely.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3538 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 15, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000702403
<NAME>                             DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1981-2 LIMITED PSHIP
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                 85,743
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          34,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      120,337
<PP&E>                             39,747,308
<DEPRECIATION>                     39,661,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        245,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  28,010
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             97,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          245,526
<SALES>                               192,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      196,208
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         153,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        42,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    42,441
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           42,441
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            6.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Scholarly Works (G13).                    

*Date:*                         October 26, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zoe E. Huang, MD, Health Science Administrator, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, MSC 7968, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-594-4937,                         *huangz@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 6, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3399 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M