alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                            |                                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|                            |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |                                                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/            Steven E. Brown |
|   | Steven E. Brown                                                                            |
|   | Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer                                         |
|   | March 15, 2011                                                                        |
§ 172.554 POISON placard. ( a ) Except for size and color, the POISON placard must be as follows:
( b ) In addition to complying with § 172.519, the background on the POISON placard must be white. The symbol, text, class number and inner border must be black. The word “TOXIC” may be used in lieu of the word “POISON”.
[Amdt. 172-123, 56 FR 66264, Dec. 20, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 172-139, 59 FR 67490, Dec. 29, 1994]
§ 1560.1 Scope, purpose, and implementation. ( a ) *Scope.* This part applies to the following: ( 1 ) Aircraft operators required to adopt a full program under 49 CFR 1544.101(a).
( 2 ) Foreign air carriers required to adopt a security program under 49 CFR 1546.101(a) or (b).
( 3 ) Airport operators that seek to authorize individuals to enter a sterile area for purposes approved by TSA.
( 4 ) Individuals who seek redress in accordance with subpart C of this part.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to enhance the security of air travel within the United States and support the Federal government's counterterrorism efforts by assisting in the detection of individuals identified on Federal government watch lists who seek to travel by air, and to facilitate the secure travel of the public. This part enables TSA to operate a watch list matching program known as Secure Flight, which involves the comparison of passenger and non-traveler information with the identifying information of individuals on Federal government watch lists.
( c ) *Implementation.* Each covered aircraft operator must begin requesting the information described in § 1560.101(a)(1) and have the capability to transmit SFPD to TSA in accordance with its Aircraft Operator Implementation Plan (AOIP) as approved by TSA. Each covered aircraft operator must begin transmitting information to TSA as required in § 1560.101(b) on the date specified in, and in accordance with, its AOIP as approved by TSA. TSA will inform each covered aircraft operator 60 days prior to the date on which TSA will assume the watch list matching function from that aircraft operator.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from Moto Photo
Inc's 1997 First Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         528,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,162,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,211,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,143,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,346,948
<PP&E>                                       2,822,202
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,610,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,392,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,776,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        77,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,181,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,392,592
<SALES>                                      7,041,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,461,748
<CGS>                                        3,762,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,381,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               484,137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               179,646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (183,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (57,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (126,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (126,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Without coal there wouldn't be a Great Pl ains Synfuels Plant. The nearby Freedom Mine, owned and operate d by the Coteau Propertie s Company, supplies lignite coal to Dakota Gas' Great Plains Synfuels Plan t and other Basin Electric power plants in the area.
America is at a critical crossroads about energy made from fo ssil fuels. Coal gasification is being attempted else where for use in generating electrici ty and producing ot her fuels with the intention of reducing ou r country's dependence on both foreign oil and natural gas. Climate change legislation mandating carbon capture and storage is going to dramatic ally affect the cost of energy to consumers.
America has more than a 800-year supply of coal that is currently ac cessible and economically feasible to recover. Use of this abundant domestic resource is being challenged around the globe. The Great Plains SynfuelsPlant is a model of how coal can be used toproduce energy in an efficient and environment ally responsible manner. Each day the Synfuels Plan t converts approximately 18,000 tons of lignite coal into an average 145 million cubic feet of synthetic natu ral gas for home heati ng and electricity generation. Dakota Gasification Company's parent company, Basi n Electric Power Cooperative, has invested more than $834 million in plant upgrades and improved environmental controls since purchasing t he plant in 1988. Experienced and dedicated empl oyees at the Synfue ls Plant have many years of hands-on operating experience in converti ng lignite coal into synthetic natural gas and other valuable coproducts. Learn more a bout how they do it. Coal-based energy i ndustries also provide a good livin g for employees and the communities that support gasification and power plant facilitie s. According to a recentstudy published by the Lignite Energy Council: "Average mining wages in Mercer County were $80,949 in 2 008, increasing from $76,403 in 2007. Mercer County is the home of the nation ’s largest lignite mine , The Coteau Properties Company’s Freedom Mine , and the Beulah Mine, owned by Westmoreland Coal Company." "Average wages for el ectric production workers in 2008 averaged $74,8 79 annually. The combination of mining and electr ic production wages puts the lignite industry among those paying the highest wages in North Dakota, substantially higher than the state’ s average wage of $35,075 in 2008." The world has begun to notice Dakota Gas achievements of the past 25 years: we are gasifying coal into clean-bur ning energy for a profit, an d capturing and transporti ng almost 50 percent of Gasification - Dakota Gasification Company http://www.dakotagas.com/Gasification/

1 of 2 8/2/2015 11:55 PMthe plant's carbon dioxide emissi ons since 2000, also fo r profit. For many utilities meeting the demands of environmental legislat ion is a beginner's game. Not soat Dakota Gas: solutions to carbon mitigation challenges fa cing many energy providers, lawmakers, regulators, and governments today have been addressed and succes sfully implemented by Dakota Gasification Company. Gasification - Dakota Gasification Company http://www.dakotagas.com/Gasification/

2 of 2 8/2/2015 11:55 PM
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/7/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with External Stakeholder Group

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 4 discussed the Clean Power Plan with a group of external stakeholders at the EPA 

Region 4 office in Atlanta, GA, on 06/12/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Beverly Banister, EPA Region 4; Todd Rinck, EPA Region 4; Jeaneanne Gettle, EPA Region 4; Carol 

Kemker, EPA Region 4; Gregg Worley, EPA Region 4; Bryan Myers, EPA Region 4; Peter Tsirigotis, OAQPS

External Stakeholders

Abby Schwimmer, Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance; Alan Hancock, Conservation Voters of South 

Carolina; Angela Garrone, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy; Ashten Bailey, GreenLaw; Jennette Gayer, 

Environment Georgia; Tanisha Thomas, Environment Georgia; Estefani Gallegos, Environment Georgia; 

Kate McGregor Mosley, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light; Kevin Kelly, Southface Energy Institute; Kurt 

Ebersbach, Southern Environmental Law Center; Luis Martinez, Natural Resources Defense Council; Rudi 

Navarra, Southeast Climate & Energy Network; Seth Gunning, Georgia Sierra Club; Stephan Smith, 

Southern Alliance for Clean Energy; Susan Berryman-Rodriguez, Mothers & Others for Clean 

Air/American Lung Association of the Southeast
Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 21, 2013, is made and entered into by and between SED International
Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), and Robert G. O’Malley, an individual (“Executive”).


 


The parties hereby
agree as follows:


 


1.This Amendment amends the Letter
Agreement (the “Letter Agreement”), dated September 7, 2012, and signed by Executive on September 15, 2012, by and
between the Company and Executive. Except as amended hereby, the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance
with its terms.


 


2.Executive shall be paid base
salary at his current rate of pay through the date hereof. Effective as of October 22, 2013, Executive shall be paid a lump sum
payment of $10,000 for his services to the Company from October 22, 2013 through the Effective Resignation Date, in lieu of all
other compensation.


 


3.Effective as of the date hereof,
Executive shall not be entitled to the payment of any further bonus compensation in connection with Executive’s employment
with the Company, whether for past, present or future services to the Company.


 


4.Executive hereby resigns from
his employment with the Company effective as of the close of business on November 21, 2013 (the “Effective Resignation Date”).
Between the date hereof and the Effective Resignation Date, Executive will continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company; provided that, in the event that the Company engages a new Chief Executive Officer prior to the Effective Resignation
Date, Executive shall serve as Advisor to the Board from and after such date and through the date of the Effective Resignation
Date. Executive shall work a full-time basis between the date hereof and the Effective Resignation Date.


 


5.Executive shall not be entitled
to the payment of any severance under the Letter Agreement as a result of his resignation hereunder or upon any other basis.


 


6.This Agreement shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia, notwithstanding any conflict of law provision to the contrary.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.


 





	SED INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.		ROBERT G. O’MALLEY
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Hesham M. Gad	 	/s/ Robert G. O’Malley
	Name: Hesham M. Gad	 	 
	Title: Executive Chairman
#### Locke *v.*Hancock.

The probate court has exclusive jurisdiction of the adjustment and establishment of advancements.

Petition for partition. Facts found by a referee.

The plaintiff claims title through Stephen and Benjamin, sons of the late John Sanborn, who at his decease was the owner of the land, and who had conveyed to Stephen and Benjamin other lands exceeding in value their share of his estate. The plaintiff contends that the question of advancements cannot be tried in this suit.

*Sanborn*and Shirley, for the plaintiff.

*Barnard*Leach, for the defendant.

Bingham, J.

The probate court has jurisdiction of all matters relating to the settlement and final distribution of decedents’ estates, including advancements. Gen. St., *c.*170, *s.*2; *c.*184, *ss.*9, 10; *Titus*v. Ash, 24 N. H. 319, *327; Henry*v. *Arms,*Smith (N. H.) 39, 44. The defendant must apply to the probate court for an adjustment and establishment of the advancements, and this case may be continued to await the result of that proceeding.

*Qase discharged.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,518
<PP&E>                                          16,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,453
<BONDS>                                          4,017
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           322
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,808
<SALES>                                          5,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,633
<CGS>                                            4,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,256)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,256)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 78.47-9 Carbon dioxide and clean agent alarms.

Each carbon dioxide or clean agent fire extinguishing alarm must be conspicuously marked: “WHEN ALARM SOUNDS VACATE AT ONCE. CARBON DIOXIDE OR CLEAN AGENT BEING RELEASED.”.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33877, June 7, 2012]
§ 130.140 Equipment testing and exercise procedures. ( a ) *Testing.* The plan must include a description of the methods used to ensure that equipment testing meets the manufacturer's minimum recommendations or equivalent.
( b ) *Exercises.* A railroad must implement and describe an exercise program for COSRPs following the National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines, which can be found using the search function on the USCG's web page (*https://homeport.uscg.mil*). These guidelines are also available from the TASC DEPT Warehouse, 33141Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20875 (fax: 301-386-5394, stock number USCG-X0241). As an alternative, a railroad choosing not to follow PREP Guidelines must have an exercise program that is equivalent to PREP. The plan must include a description of the exercise procedures and programs the railroad uses to assess whether its response plan will function as planned, including the types of exercises and their frequencies.
( c ) *Recordkeeping.* Railroads must keep records showing the exercise dates and times, and the after action reports that accompany the response plan exercises. Railroads must provide copies of these records to Department of Transportation representatives upon request.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, April 5, 1995 (56), Para 56.10 Call in Committee]
[Page 536]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.56.10  call in committee

  Mr. BOEHNER, Chairman, announced that the Committee, having had under 
consideration said bill, finding itself without a quorum, directed the 
Members to record their presence by electronic device, and the 
following-named Members responded--
```
§ 1114.30 Production of documents and records and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes. ( a ) *Scope.* Any party may serve on any other party a request: ( 1 ) To produce and permit the party making the request to inspect any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phonograph records, tapes, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, with or without the use of detection devices into reasonably usable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served, but if the writings or data compilations include privileged or proprietary information or information the disclosure of which is proscribed by the Act, such writings or data compilations need not be produced under this rule but may be provided pursuant to § 1114.26(b) of this part; or
( 2 ) To permit, subject to appropriate liability releases and safety and operating considerations, entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspecting and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon.
( b ) *Procedure.* Any request filed pursuant to this rule should set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request should specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.
( c ) *Limitation under simplified standards.* In a case using the Three-Benchmark methodology, each party is limited to ten document requests (including subparts) absent advance authorization from the Board.
( d ) *Agreements containing interchange commitments.* In any proceeding involving the reasonableness of provisions related to an existing rail carrier sale or lease agreement that serve to induce a party to the agreement to interchange traffic with another party to the agreement, rather than with a third-party connecting carrier, whether by outright prohibition, per-car penalty, adjustment in the purchase price or rental, positive economic inducement, or other means, a party to the proceeding with a need for the information may obtain a confidential, complete version of the agreement, with the prior approval of the Board. The party seeking such approval must file an appropriate motion containing an explanation of the party's need for the information and a draft protective order and undertaking(s) that will ensure the agreement is kept confidential. The motion seeking approval may be filed at any time after the initial complaint or petition, including before the answer to the complaint or petition is due. A reply to such a motion must be filed within 5 days thereafter. The motion will be considered by the Board in an expedited manner.
[61 FR 52713, Oct. 8, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 51377, Sept. 7, 2007; 73 FR 31034, May 30, 2008]
§ 1503.639 Burden of proof. ( a ) Except in the case of an affirmative defense, the burden of proof is on the agency.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, the proponent of a motion, request, or order has the burden of proof.
( c ) A party who has asserted an affirmative defense has the burden of proving the affirmative defense.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION


        Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of Diagnostic Products Corporation ("DPC") that the Quarterly Report of DPC on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of DPC at the end of such period and the
results of its operations for such period.



Dated August 12, 2003                   /S/ Michael Ziering
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael Ziering, Chief Executive Officer


                                        /S/ James L. Brill
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James L. Brill, Chief Financial Officer