alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   November9, 2010   /s/ Roy T.K. Thung* Roy T. K. Thung Chief Executive Officer and President   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 28, 2012

---





## Forms

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

         Information relating to certain of the subsidiaries of Peoples Heritage
Financial Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 is set forth below. All of the
indicated subsidiaries are directly or indirectly wholly-owned by Peoples
Heritage Financial Group, Inc.


Direct Subsidiaries:

Name                                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----                                               -----------------------------

Peoples Heritage Bank                                      Maine
Bank of New Hampshire                                      New Hampshire
Family Bank, FSB                                           United States
Glastonbury Bank & Trust Company                           Connecticut
Peoples Heritage Capital Trust I                           Delaware

Indirect Subsidiaries:

Name                                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----                                               -----------------------------

Heritage Investment Planning Group, Inc.(1)                Maine
Peoples Heritage Leasing Corp.(1)                          Maine
MPN Holdings (holding company for                          Maine
    insurance brokerage subsidiaries)(1)



----------
(1)  Subsidiary of Peoples Heritage Bank.
§ 42.20-3 Freeboard assignment: Type “A” vessels. ( a ) A Type “A” vessel is assigned a freeboard not less than that based on table 42.20-15(a)(1) provided that the vessel meets the flooding standard in § 42.20-6.
( b ) A vessel that meets the requirements of subpart D, F, or G of part 172 of this chapter is considered by the Coast Guard as meeting the flooding standard referenced in paragraph (a) of this section.
[CGD 79-153, 48 FR 38647, Aug. 25, 1983, as amended by CGD 79-023, 49 FR 26593, June 28, 1984]
§ 502.285 Investigational hearings. ( a ) Investigational hearings, as distinguished from hearings in adjudicatory proceedings, may be conducted in the course of any investigation undertaken by the Commission, including inquiries initiated for the purpose of determining whether or not a person is complying with an order of the Commission.
( b ) Investigational hearings may be held before the Commission, one or more of its members, or a duly designated representative, for the purpose of hearing the testimony of witnesses and receiving documents and other data relating to any subject under investigation. Such hearings shall be stenographically reported and a transcript thereof shall be made a part of the record of investigation. [Rule 285.]
#### §§ 1014.112-1014.129 [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 4, 2013

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|DONEGAL GROUP, INC | CIC           | Gregory M. Shepard, Bradenton, FL, to acquire up to 24.38 percent of Donegal Group Inc., Marietta, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/20/2013
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 05/20/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10(p)(4)


                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                          TO THE BANKNORTH GROUP, INC.
                PROFIT SHARING AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

         The Banknorth Group, Inc. Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (known before May 10, 2000, as the Peoples Heritage Financial Group, Inc.
Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan) (the "Plan") was last amended
and restated effective generally January 1, 1997, and subsequently amended by
First and Second Amendments effective as of the dates set forth in the
respective amendments, and shall be further amended as set forth herein.

         1. The terms used in this Third Amendment shall have the meanings set
forth in the Plan unless the context indicates otherwise.

         2. Effective May 10, 2000, the Plan shall be formally known as the
Banknorth Group, Inc. Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, to record the adoption of this Third Amendment,
Banknorth Group, Inc. has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly
authorized officer this 29th day of December, 2000.

                                          BANKNORTH GROUP, INC.



                                          By /s/ Susan G. Shorey
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Its Senior Vice President
98-2534.

#### State v. Campbell.

Cuyahoga App. No. 62216. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of
Directors and StockholdersOregon Steel Mills, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-113740, 333-118959, 33-26739, 33-58302, 333-86980, and 333-68732) on Forms
S-3 and S-8 of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2005,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, the consolidated balance sheets of New
CF&I, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders deficit and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and the balance sheets of CF&I Steel, L.P. as of December
31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of income, changes in
partners deficit and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, which reports appear in
the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. and
subsidiaries refers to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46R,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, in 2004.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Portland,
OregonMarch 11, 2005
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. RALPH WOLFORD, Commissioner, etc., Appellant, v. AMIDON M. STREVELL and Others, as Referees, etc., Respondents.

*Befusal of a commissioner to lay out a highway through inclosed land*— when *the owner consents, no certificate of a jury is necessary in order to amitlwrize an appeal to the county judge*— 1 *B. 8.,*514, *secs.*58, 60; *1877, chap. 465*— thereferees *appointed by the county judge upon such an appeal may meet outside of the town limits.*

Certiorari to review the determination of - the defendants, as referees appointed by the county judge of Albany county, upon an appeal from an order of the relator, as commissioner of highways of the town of Knox, refusing to lay out a highway through the inclosed land of James Armstrong. Armstrong, the owner of the land, gave his consent, but no jury of freeholders certified that, the proposed road was necessary or proper. The commissioner •refused to lay out the road. The referees reversed the order of the commissioner.

The court at General Term said : “ The relator objects that since no certificate of a jury was obtained, no appeal lies from the commissioner’s refusal to lay out the highway. He is mistaken. The Revised Statutes (1 R. S., 514, § 58) prohibit the laying out of a highway through inclosed, improved or cultivated land, without the consent of the owner or occupant, unless certified to be necessary by the oath of twelve reputable freeholders of the town. Section 60, as amended by chapter 465, Laws 1877, prescribes the method *219of obtaining the certificate *‘*in all cases, * * * except where the same is altered, opened or laid ont with the consent in writing of the owner.’ In this case the owner did give his consent in writing, and as the statute now is, no method of obtaining the certificate is given, except in case the consent of the owner is not given. *****

“The referees, after their first meeting, had several hearings outside of the town of Knox, and the commissioner alleges that they thereby lost jurisdiction of the matter. The statute gives the referees power to adjourn from time to time. (1 R. S., 519, § 89.)

“ The statute requires that the referees shall not be residents of the town in which the proposed highway is situate. While the referees held the matter under advisement, it was inevitable that each one should separately consider the matter outside of the town of Knox, and no reason is perceived why they might not collectively do so. No abuse is alleged ; jurisdiction was obtained pursuant to the statute, and every statutory requirement was observed.”

*U. Krum,*for the relator.

*O. M.*Hungerford, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Landon, J.;

Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J., concurred.

Order of. referees affirmed, with fifty dollars costs, allowed by section 2143 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and disbursements.
#### § 1021.4 Notice of claim and demand.

Initiation of administrative collection of enforcement claims will be commenced by the enforcement collection designee mailing a letter of notice of claim and demand to the debtor. Such letter will state the statutory basis for the claim, a brief resume of the factual basis for the claim, the amount of the claim, and indicate the availability of the designee or his personal agent for discussion of the claim should the debtor so desire.
CA-EX10.1_CICScheduleUpdates20130801




Exhibit 10.1




CA, Inc. Change in Control Severance Policy 
(Amended as of December 10, 2012)


(Schedules as of August 1, 2013)




Schedule A
(2.99 Multiple)


Chief Executive Officer (Michael P. Gregoire)*
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Richard J. Beckert)*
Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Worldwide Sales and Services (George J. Fischer)
Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Enterprise Solutions and Technology Group 
(Peter JL Griffiths)*


[Employees may be added or eliminated from time to time]
  
Schedule B
(2.00 Multiple)


Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Mainframe and Customer Success Group (Adam Elster)*
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (Lauren P. Flaherty)
Executive Vice President and General Counsel (Amy Fliegelman Olli)


[Employees may be added or eliminated from time to time]
  
Schedule C
(1.00 Multiple)


Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development (Jacob Lamm) 


[Employees may be added or eliminated from time to time]




*Denotes participants not eligible for the excise tax-gross-up pursuant to section 4(g) of the Policy.
§ 1503.603 Separation of functions. ( a ) Civil penalty proceedings, including hearings, will be prosecuted only by an agency attorney, except to the extent another agency official is permitted to issue and prosecute civil penalties under § 1503.421 of this part.
( b ) An agency employee engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecutorial functions in a civil penalty action must not, in that case or a factually related case, participate or give advice in a decision by the ALJ or by the TSA decision maker on appeal, except as counsel or a witness in the public proceedings.
( c ) The Chief Counsel or an agency attorney not covered by paragraph (b) of this section will advise the TSA decision maker regarding an initial decision or any appeal of a civil penalty action to the TSA decision maker.
#### Union Dime Savings Institution of the City of New York, *Appellant, v.*Francis J. Clark, *Respondent*.

Order affirmed on the opinion of

Potter, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000830320
<NAME>                        ENEX INCOME AND RETIREMENT FUND - SERIES 3, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         8244
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42901
<PP&E>                                         1312406
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1150513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44586
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     160208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204794
<SALES>                                        118862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118862
<CGS>                                          83463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  83463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               30690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.323 ALJ's decision. ( a ) After consideration of all matters of record in the proceeding, the ALJ shall issue an order dismissing the notice of probable violation in whole or in part or granting the sanction sought by the Office of Chief Counsel in the notice. If the ALJ does not dismiss the notice of probable violation in whole, he issues an order directing compliance or assessing a civil penalty, or, if proposed in the notice, both. The order includes a statement of the findings and conclusions, and the reasons therefore, on all material issues of fact, law, and discretion.
( b ) If, within 20 days of receipt of an order issued under paragraph (a) of this section, the respondent does not submit in writing his acceptance of the terms of an order directing compliance, or, where appropriate, pay a civil penalty, or file an appeal under § 107.325, the case may be referred to the Attorney General with a request that an action be brought in the appropriate United States District Court to enforce the terms of a compliance order or collect the civil penalty.
§ 1108.7 Arbitration procedures. ( a ) *Initiation.* With the exception of rate dispute arbitration proceedings, the Board shall initiate the arbitration process within 40 days after submission of a written complaint or joint notice filed under § 1108.5(e). In arbitrations involving rate disputes, the Board shall initiate the arbitration process within 10 days after the Board issues a decision determining that the rail carrier has market dominance.
( b ) *Arbitration evidentiary phase timetable.* Whether the parties select a single arbitrator or a panel of three arbitrators, the lead or single arbitrator shall establish all rules deemed necessary for each arbitration proceeding, including with regard to discovery, the submission of evidence, and the treatment of confidential information, subject to the requirement that this evidentiary phase shall be completed within 90 days from the date on which the arbitration process is initiated, unless a party requests an extension, and the arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, as applicable, grants such extension request.
( c ) *Written decision timetable.* The lead or single arbitrator will be responsible for writing the arbitration decision. The unredacted arbitration decision must be served on the parties within 30 days of completion of the evidentiary phase. A redacted copy of the arbitration decision must be served upon the Board within 60 days of the close of the evidentiary phase for publication on the Board's Web site.
( d ) *Extensions to the arbitration timetable.* The Board may extend any deadlines in the arbitration timetable provided in this subpart upon agreement of all parties to the dispute.
( e ) *Protective orders.* Any party, on either side of an arbitration proceeding, may request that discovery and the submission of evidence be conducted pursuant to a standard protective order agreement.
[81 FR 69416, Oct. 6, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 729, Jan. 4, 2023]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending July 13, 2013

|Filer                   | Filing Type        | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. | * 3A5* 18C* Branch | United Bankshares, Inc., Charleston, West Virginia, and George Mason Bankshares, Inc., Fairfax, Virginia, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Arlington, Virginia,and thereby indirectly acquire Virginia Commerce Bank, Arlington, Virgina. | Newspaper:08/03/2013Federal Register:08/01/2013
|Newspaper:              | 08/03/2013        
|Federal Register:       | 08/01/2013        

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Same *v.*Same.

Appeal from order denying motion to vacate stay. Order reversed and stay vacated.