alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Susan Fairchild To: Angus Crane Cc: Jeff Telander; Reeves, David ; Hancy, Cindy Wang Subject: cupola subcategorization according to open v. closed top Date: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 2:10:23 PM In your letter, you describe cupola subcategorization according to open v. closed top. I have copied that section below. How do these 2 design differences affect emissions of COS, HF and HCl (and PM)? "NAIMA urges EPA to consider subcategorizing the industry based on “open top” cupolas and “closed top” cupolas. Open top cupolas are different in that the mineral charge is inserted at the top of the cupola rather than the side. “Open top” is a process distinction differing from the other mineral wool cupolas. In addition, the open top cupolas are exposed to the environmental elements; when it rains or snows, the moisture goes through the top. Based on these differences, NAIMA recommends the following subcategories: “Open Top” Cupolas

· Amerrock – Nolanville, Texas · Rock Wool Manufacturing – Leeds, Alabama “Closed Top” Cupolas

· IIG – Phenix City, Alabama · Isolatek International – Huntington, Indiana · Thermafiber – Wabash, Indiana · USG – Red Wing, Minnesota · USG – Walworth, Wisconsin"

Thanks, Susan Fairchild Environmental Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency direct line: 919.541.5167 fax: 919.541-3207 email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov Overnight mail address: US EPA Mail Code D243-04 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 10, 1995 (63), Para 63.24 Memorials]
[Page 676]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.63.24  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       76. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of Colorado, relative to the 
     Contract With America; to the Committee on Government Reform 
     and Oversight.
       77. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Colorado, relative to the Federal Aviation 
     Administration Authorization Act of 1994; to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
       78. Also, memorial of the General Assembly of the State of 
     Rhode Island, relative to the Small Business Administration; 
     to the Committee on Small Business.
```
§ 1101.2 Definitions applicable to this subchapter. ( a ) Act or Interstate Commerce Act means subtitle IV of title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C. 10101 *et seq.*).
( b ) *Board* means ( 1 ) the Surface Transportation Board and
( 2 ) any body or individual to which or to whom decision making authority is assigned by the Board or the Chairman of the Board, including the Chairman, another Board Member, employee board, an individual employee, an administrative law judge, or other hearing officer entitled to act in a particular proceeding. See 49 CFR part 1011, Board Organization; Delegations of Authority.
( c ) *Decision* means any formal, published action of the Board, including orders and notices.
( d ) *Party* means a complainant, defendant, applicant, respondent, protestant, intervener, or petitioner in any proceeding, or other persons permitted or directed by the Board to participate in a proceeding. It will not include persons merely signing certificates of support or witnesses at oral hearing or in modified procedure proceedings, unless they are otherwise a party to the proceeding. Persons on the docket service list merely for the purpose of receiving copies of Board releases are not considered parties to the proceeding.
( e ) *Proceeding* includes: ( 1 ) An *informal complaint* filed under §§ 1130.1, or 1130.2 or a *formal complaint* alleging violation of any provision of the Act or of any regulation or requirement made pursuant to a power granted by such Act, including petitions on special dockets;
( 2 ) An *application* for ( i ) the granting of any right, privilege, authority, or relief under or from any provision of the Act or of any regulation or requirement made pursuant to a power granted by such Act, or
( ii ) the consideration of any submission required by law to be made to the Board;
( 3 ) An *investigation* instituted by the Board;
( 4 ) A *rulemaking* proposal instituted by the Board; or
( 5 ) A petition for exemption filed under 49 U.S.C. 10502 requesting the Board to exempt from application all or part of subtitle IV of title 49 of the United States Code any person, class of persons, transaction, or service related to a rail carrier.
[47 FR 49548, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 30275, July 25, 1985; 64 FR 53267, Oct. 1, 1999; 69 FR 58365, Sept. 30, 2004; 81 FR 8852, Feb. 23, 2016]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 10, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the registrant);2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Samuel D. Jimenez
#### § 109.16 Notification of enforcement measures.

In addition to complying with the notification requirements in § 109.7 of this part, an agent, after exercising an authority under this subpart, will immediately take reasonable measures to notify the offeror and the person in possession of the package, providing the reason for the action being taken, the results of any preliminary investigation including apparent violations of subchapter C of this chapter, and any further action that may be warranted.

[78 FR 60763, Oct. 2, 2013]
#### § 76.25-1 Application.

Automatic sprinkler systems must comply with Chapter 25 of NFPA 13 (incorporation by reference, see § 76.01-2).

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48255, July 22, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MEGHAN MERCEDES 

CASSIDY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:15-cv-12277 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

___________________________________/ 

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DE 16), GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DE 17) AND AFFIRMING THE DECISION 

OF THE COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 

Plaintiff, Meghan Mercedes Cassidy, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 

405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social 

Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance 

benefits. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment 

(DE 16), the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment (DE 17), and 

the administrative record (DE 10-11). 

The parties have consented to my authority. (DE 19.) A hearing was 

noticed for September 1, 2016. On that date, Plaintiff’s counsel, Kenneth F. Laritz, 

2:15-cv-12277-APP Doc # 22 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 642
2

appeared in person and Defendant’s counsel, AUSA Amelia Stewart, appeared by 

telephone. 

The Court concludes that the ALJ unerringly applied the correct legal 

standards in reaching her decision and that substantial evidence in the record 

supports her findings. As stated in Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the 

ALJ’s credibility findings were supported by substantial evidence, she correctly 

analyzed the weight given to non-examining physician Dr. Khalid’s opinion, and 

the RFC finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record.1

 Accordingly, 

and for the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED (DE 16), 

Defendant’s motion is GRANTED (DE 17), and the decision of the Commissioner 

of Social Security is AFFIRMED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 2, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

1

 And, as explained on the record, any error the ALJ may have made with respect 

to her observations about statements concerning aerobic exercise in the ALJ’s 

analysis of Plaintiff’s credibility was harmless, as there were several other valid 

bases given for discounting Plaintiff’s credibility and the overall analysis was 

correct.

2:15-cv-12277-APP Doc # 22 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 643
3

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on September 2, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

 

 

 

2:15-cv-12277-APP Doc # 22 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 644
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
GSI Commerce, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 28, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Jordan M. Copland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                             By: /s/ Jordan M. Copland
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Jordan M. Copland
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


March 25, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 13, 2010

|Filer                | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|FA CAPITAL, LLC      | * 3A3          | FA Capital, LLC. and Community Bank Investors of America, L.P., both located in Richmond, Virginia, to retain 9.86% of the voting securities of ICB Financial, Ontario, California.                                                        | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:           | Not available 
|Federal Register:    | Not available 
|ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 4c8            | Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, Canada, to indirectly acquire BlueBay Asset Management USA LLC, Darien, Connecticut, through BlueBay Asset Management plc, London, England, and to engage in financial and investment advisory activities. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:           | Not applicable
|Federal Register:    | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending December 22, 2012

|Filer                       | Filing Type        | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                  
|--------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION | Investment         | Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, to acquire Virgin Money Cards Limited.                                                                                                                | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                  | Not applicable    
|Federal Register:           | Not applicable    
|BANQUE CENTRALE POPULAIRE   | FBSEA              | Banque Centrale Populaire, Casablanca, Morocco, to establish a representative office in Washington, D.C.                                                                                                      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable 
|Newspaper:                  | Not available     
|Federal Register:           | Not applicable    
|OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC.   | * 18C* 4c8* Branch | Old Line Bancshares, Inc., Bowie, Maryland, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of WSB Holdings, Inc., Bowie, Maryland, and thereby indirectly acquire Washington Savings Bank, F.S.B., Bowie, Maryland. | Newspaper:01/14/2013Federal Register:01/10/2013        
|Newspaper:                  | 01/14/2013        
|Federal Register:           | 01/10/2013        

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-2282.

#### State v. Johnson.

Delaware App. No. 96CAA12066. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1730

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that individuals

who are required to leave their employment because of certain medical

or family reasons will not be denied unemployment compensation when

they are ready to return to work.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that individuals who are required to leave their employment because of certain medical or family reasons will

not be denied unemployment compensation when they

are ready to return to work.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (a) of section 3304 of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to approval of State un5 employment compensation laws) is amended by striking

6 ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (17), by redesignating
2

HR 1730 IH

1 paragraph (18) as paragraph (19), and by inserting after

2 paragraph (17) the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(18)(A) if any individual leaves employment

4 for a qualified family-related reason, for purposes of

5 determining such individual’s eligibility for com6 pensation for any subsequent week for which such

7 individual meets the State law requirements relating

8 to availability for work and active search for work—

9 ‘‘(i) such individual shall be treated as

10 leaving such employment for good cause, and

11 ‘‘(ii) any failure while the qualified family12 related reason continues to return to such em13 ployment or to otherwise meet such State law

14 requirements shall be disregarded,

15 ‘‘(B) for purposes of subparagraph (A), the

16 term ‘qualified family reason’ means any cir17 cumstance which entitles the individual to unpaid

18 leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of

19 1993 (or would entitle the individual to such leave

20 if the individual’s employer were subject to the re21 quirements of such Act) whether or not the individ22 ual returns to employment after the leave to which

23 such individual is (or would be entitled); and’’.
3

HR 1730 IH

1 (b)(1) Except as provided by paragraph (2), the

2 amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on

3 November 1, 1995.

4 (2) In the case of any State the legislature of which

5 has not been in session for at least 30 calendar days

6 (whether or not successive) between the date of the enact7 ment of this Act and November 1, 1995, the amendment

8 made by subsection (a) shall take effect 30 calendar days

9 after the first day on which such legislature is in session

10 on or after November 1, 1995.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2022
TYRONE SIMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALBEMARLE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-317-5-22BD) Submitted: March 18, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Gist, THE GIST LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Eric C. Schweitzer, Catherine B. Templeton, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Sims appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to his former employer on his racial discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sims v. Albemarle Corp. , No. CA-01-317-5-22BD (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED