alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1772 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1772

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain 
   interests in the Waihee Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National 
                        Wildlife Refuge Complex.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1772

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain 
   interests in the Waihee Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National 
                        Wildlife Refuge Complex.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE OAHU 
              NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX.

    (a) Authority To Acquire.--The Secretary of the Interior may 
acquire, for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 
the area known as the Waihee Marsh, located on the northeast coast of 
the Island of Oahu, Hawaii, consisting of approximately 36 acres (as 
determined by the Secretary) along both sides of Kamehameha Highway.
    (b) Management of Acquired Interests.--Lands and interests acquired 
by the United States under this section shall be managed by the 
Secretary of the Interior as part of the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge 
Complex.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 130.115 Consistency with Area Contingency Plans. ( a ) A railroad must certify for each response zone that it reviewed each applicable ACP (or Regional Contingency Plan (RCP) for areas lacking an ACP).
( b ) At a minimum, for consistency with the applicable ACP (or Regional Contingency Plan (RCP) for areas lacking an ACP), the comprehensive response plan must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Address the removal of a worst-case discharge, and the mitigation or prevention of the substantial threat of a worst-case discharge, of oil;
( 2 ) Identify environmentally sensitive or significant areas along the route, as defined in § 130.5, which could be adversely affected by a worst-case discharge, by reviewing and summarizing the applicable ACP or RCP;
( 3 ) Incorporate appropriate strategies identified in applicable ACPs or RCPs, to protect environmentally sensitive or significant areas identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
( 4 ) Describe the responsibilities of the railroad and of Federal, State, and local agencies in removing a discharge and in mitigating or preventing a substantial threat of a discharge; and
( 5 ) Identify the procedures to obtain any required Federal and State authorization for using alternative response strategies such as in-situ burning and/or chemical agents, as provided for in the applicable ACP and subpart J of 40 CFR part 300.
§ 176.54 Repairs involving welding, burning, and power-actuated tools and appliances. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, repairs or work involving welding or burning, or the use of power-actuated tools or appliances which may produce intense heat may not be undertaken on any vessel having on board explosives or other hazardous materials as cargo.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply if: ( 1 ) The repairs or work are approved by the COTP under 33 CFR 126.30; or
( 2 ) Emergency repairs to the vessel's main propelling or boiler plant or auxiliaries are necessary for the safety of the vessel. If such repairs are performed, the master of the vessel must immediately notify the nearest COTP.
[Amdt. 176-1, 41 FR 16110, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 176-30, 55 FR 52689, Dec. 21, 1990; 75 FR 53597, Sept. 1, 2010]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41597 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAFAEL ALONSO FLORES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-506-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael Alonso Flores has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a briefin accordancewith Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Flores has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw isNo. 06-41597

2 GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1900

To amend the Clean Air Act to exempt agriculture-related facilities from

certain permitting requirements, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 1995

Mr. NUSSLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to exempt agriculture-related

facilities from certain permitting requirements, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF POTENTIAL TO EMIT.

4 Section 302(j) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

5 7602(j)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(j) Except as otherwise’’ and

7 inserting the following:

8 ‘‘(j) MAJOR STATIONARY SOURCE AND MAJOR EMIT9 TING FACILITY.—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise’’; and
2

HR 1900 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following:

2 ‘‘(2) AGRICULTURE-RELATED FACILITY.—In

3 this subsection, with respect to an agriculture-relat4 ed facility, such as a grain elevator, a grain, feed,

5 or rice mill, or a grain processing facility:

6 ‘‘(A) AIR POLLUTANT.—With respect to

7 particular emissions, the term ‘air pollutant’

8 shall include only particulate matter less than

9 or equal to 10 microns in size.

10 ‘‘(B) POTENTIAL TO EMIT.—

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘poten12 tial to emit’ means the potential of a facil13 ity to emit during a 1-year period under

14 maximum realistic operation of the facility.

15 ‘‘(ii) MAXIMUM REALISTIC OPER16 ATION.—In determining the maximum re17 alistic operation of an agriculture-related

18 facility, the Administrator shall consider—

19 ‘‘(I) the cyclical or seasonal na20 ture of the facility; and

21 ‘‘(II) in the case of a facility in

22 operation on the date of the deter23 mination, the maximum hours of op24 eration of the facility that actually oc-
3

HR 1900 IH

1 curred during any of the preceding 5

2 years.

3 ‘‘(iii) EQUIPMENT, TECHNIQUES, AND

4 PROCEDURES.—The Administrator shall

5 consider the effect of control equipment,

6 techniques, and procedures in lowering the

7 potential to emit of an agriculture-related

8 facility.’’.

9 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.

10 Section 502 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7661a)

11 is amended—

12 (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by

13 striking ‘‘any other source (including an area

14 source) subject to standards or regulations under

15 section 111 or 112,’’, and

16 (2) by adding at the end the following:

17 ‘‘(j) EXEMPTION.—A source shall not be subject to

18 any regulation or requirement under this section if the

19 source is—

20 ‘‘(1) not major source; and

21 ‘‘(2) subject to section 111 or 112.’’.

Æ
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:            May      13,  2008 |  /s/ Erik      Cooper                     . |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                      | Erik      Cooper                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                                                                                                      | Principal      Executive Officer                                                                                                                          |   |
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 10, 1995 (63), Para 63.8 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 655]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.63.8  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. BOEHNER, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule today: the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services, the Committee on Commerce, the Committee 
on Economic and Educational Opportunities, the Committee on House 
Oversight, the Committee on International Relations, and the Committee 
on Resources.
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.0
 
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
   NRLP Management Corp., a wholly-owned Nevada corporation and the general
partner of National Realty, L.P. and National Operating, L.P. both Delaware
partnerships, and American General Realty, Inc., a wholly-owned Nevada
corporation the parent of Pizza World Supreme, Inc., a wholly-owned Nevada
corporation, are "significant subsidiaries" of the Company (as such term is
defined in Rule 1-02(v) of Regulation S-X). The remaining subsidiaries of the
Company, considered in the aggregate, would not constitute a "significant
subsidiary".
§ 503.72 General rule—meetings. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in §§ 503.73, 503.74, 503.75, 503.76, and 503.84, every portion of every meeting and every portion of a series of meetings of the agency shall be open to public observation.
( b ) The opening of a portion or portions of a meeting or a portion or portions of a series of meetings to public observation shall not be construed to include any participation by the public in any manner in the meeting. Such an attempted participation or participation shall be cause for removal of any person so engaged at the discretion of the presiding member of the agency.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 85 FR 9682, Feb. 20, 2020]
#### § 1503.1 Scope.

This part provides information on TSA's investigative and enforcement procedures.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending June 1, 2013

----

Bank Branches, DomesticSt. Louis          Midland States Bank, Effingham, Illinois -- to establish a branch at 38 West Countryside Parkway, Yorkville.            -Approved, May 30, 2013            Bank Holding CompaniesDirector, BS&R          Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc., Beverly Hills, California -- relief from certain commitments.            -Granted, May 29, 2013            Atlanta          Progress Financial Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama -- to become a bank holding company by acquiring Progress Bank and Trust, Huntsville.            -Approved, May 23, 2013            (A/C)          Atlanta          Southern Community Bancshares, Inc., Cullman, Alabama -- relief from a commitment.            -Granted, May 28, 2013            Dallas          Strategic Growth Bank Incorporated, El Paso, Texas, and Strategic Growth Bancorp Incorporated -- to acquire Marsh Associates, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, and thereby engage in making, acquiring, brokering or servicing mortgage loans or other extensions of credit; acting as agent for the private placement of securities; and engaging under contract with a third party in asset management, servicing, and collection of assets.            -Approved, May 30, 2013            Change in Bank ControlMinneapolis          Traxshares, Inc., Le Center, Minnesota -- to retain control of Traxshares, Inc. and its subsidiary, The First National Bank of Le Center, Le Center.            -Permitted, May 31, 2013            Financial Holding Companies Philadelphia          Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Williamsport, Pennsylvania -- election to become a financial holding company.            -Effective, May 31, 2013            Reserve Bank OperationsDirector, RBOPS          Federal Reserve Bank of Boston -- to make an additional capital expenditure for the Enterprise Accounting System.            -Approved, March 20, 2013            (A/C)          Director, RBOPS          Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas -- to commit funds for tenant improvements related to leased office space for the San Antonio Branch.            -Approved, March 26, 2013            (A/C)          Director, RBOPS          Federal Reserve Bank of New York -- to make a capital expenditure to fund the Reserve Bank's program supporting the Department of the Treasury's planned issuance of floating rate notes.            -Approved, March 18, 2013            (A/C)          Director, RBOPS          Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco -- to approve a contractual lease arrangement between the Reserve Bank and Deloitte & Touche LLP.            -Approved, March 18, 2013            (A/C)          
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### John Roach and others, *Respondents, v.*Isaac F. Duckworth, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
  /s/ Patrick J. Moty
    
    /s/ Samuel D. JimenezPatrick J. Moty
    
    Samuel D. JimenezPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant

to Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This order and judgment is

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,

and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and

judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and

conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

October 25, 2005

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RANDOLPH ADRIAN JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-6292

(D.C. No. CR-03-70-T)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Randolph Adrian Jackson appeals his sentence of five years imprisonment

imposed following his guilty plea to interstate travel with intent to promote

unlawful activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3) and aiding and abetting in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. He argues that the district court’s mandatory

application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines violates the Supreme Court’s

decision in United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct 738 (2005). He further argues that
- 2 -

Booker error amounts to structural error, and therefore his case should be

remanded for resentencing. He acknowledges this court recently held that nonconstitutional Booker error does not constitute structural error. United States v.

Gonzalez-Huerta, 403 F.3d 727, 733-34 (10th Cir. 2005) (en banc). He raises this

issue exclusively to preserve an appeal to the Supreme Court. Because Jackson

did not challenge his sentence on Booker grounds below, we review the nonconstitutional Booker error that results from a mandatory application of the

sentencing guidelines for plain error. Gonzalez-Huerta, 403 F.3d at 732. Jackson

does not argue on appeal that Booker error affected his substantial rights or

affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. As

such, we decline to remand for resentencing.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the sentencing order entered by the district

court.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 21, 1995 (84), Para 84.10 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1026]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.84.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following substitute amendment submitted by Mr. CASTLE 
for the amendment submitted by Mr. NEUMANN:
  Substitute amendment submitted by Mr. CASTLE:

       Page 3, line 6, strike ``$360,503,000'' and insert 
     ``$355,903,000''. 

  Amendment submitted by Mr. NEUMANN:

       Page 3, line 6, strike ``$360,503,000'' and insert 
     ``$351,217,000''. 

It was decided in the

Yeas

213

negative

Nays

215
```
Order entered July 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01014-CV

IN RE REGINALD NOBLE, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F00-50025-K

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending August 1, 2009

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|COMMUNITY TRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A5          | Community Trust Financial Corporation, Ruston, Louisiana, to acquire by merger First Louisiana Bancshares, Inc., Shreveport, Louisiana, and  indirectly acquire First Louisiana Bank, Shreveport, Louisiana.                                                                                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:08/20/2009    
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | 08/20/2009    
|TEXAS FIRST BANK                      | * 18C* Branch  | Texas First Bank, Texas City, Texas, to merge with affiliate Texas First Bank-Winnie, Winnie, Texas,  and to establish branches at the following locations:  210 Highway 124, Winnie, Texas 77665; 519 Rollingbrook Drive, Baytown, Texas 77521; and Highway 124 and F.M. 365, Fannett, Texas 77705. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us