alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Civ. No. 1203.

Second Appellate District.

November 16, 1912.]

#### THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent, v. F. C. LEHMER, C. M. GEHRKENS, and HENRY SIEMER, Appellants.

Compensation of City Treasurer—Percentage on Moneys “Received and Paid”—Municipal Corporation Act—Case Affirmed.—Where the compensation of a city treasurer is based on section 876 of the Municipal Corporation Act, which provides that he “shall be allowed one per centum on all moneys received and paid by him as such treasurer,” he is not entitled to a percentage on moneys received and also on moneys paid. The percentage should be computed solely upon the amount paid out by him from that which he had received. *City of Corona*v. *Merriam et al., ante,*p. 231, approved.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. D. Murphey, Judge presiding.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Shaw & Stewart, for Appellants.

Charles C. Montgomery, for Respondent.

SHAW, J.

The facts presented by the record herein are identical with those involved in the ease of *City of Corona*
      *378v. *Merriam et al., ante,*p. 231, [128 Pac. 769], an opinion which was filed in this court October 25, 1912,

In each case the action was one prosecuted by the city against its treasurer to recover from him and his sureties moneys retained by him and claimed as compensation for ser-, vices as such city treasurer. In the Corona case the claim of the treasurer was based upon an ordinance providing that, in addition to a salary of fifteen dollars per month, he should receive “one per centum on all moneys received and paid out by him as treasurer.” In the ease at bar the claim of the treasurer, in the absence of an ordinance fixing his compensation, is based upon section 876 of the Municipal Corporation Act, (Henning’s General Laws, p. 907) which provides that he “shall be allowed one per centum on all moneys received and paid by him as such treasurer.” It thus appears that, except in the one case the compensation is fixed by ordinance, while in the other it is fixed by statute, the provisions are identical. In each case the treasurer insisted that by virtue of the provisions quoted he was entitled to one per cent, not only upon the amount of money received by him as treasurer, but a like percentage upon the amount paid out, while the claim of the cities was that the percentage should be computed upon the amount paid out by him from that which he had received.

In the case at bar the trial court accepted the latter view, which is in accordance with the opinion of this court rendered in the case of *City of Corona*v. *Merriam et al.,*ante, p. 231, [128 Pac. 769], Upon the authority of that case, the facts presented being the same, the judgment from which defendants appeal must be and is affirmed.

Allen, P. J., and James, J., concurred.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 173](/current/title-49/part-173?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at [70 FR 56098](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-56098), Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 173.425 Table of activity limits—excepted quantities and articles.

The limits applicable to instruments, articles, and limited quantities subject to exceptions under [§§ 173.421](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-173.421) and [173.424](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-173.424) are set forth in table 4 as follows:

Table 4—Activity Limits for Limited Quantities, Instruments, and Articles

| Nature of contents | Instruments and articles | | Limited quantity package limits1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Limits for each instrument or article1 | Package limits1 |
| Solids: | | | |
| Special form | 10−2 A1 | A1 | 10−3 A1 |
| Normal form | 10−2 A2 | A2 | 10−3 A2 |
| Liquids: | | | |
| Tritiated water: | | | |
| <0.0037 TBq/L (0.1 Ci/L) | | | 37 TBq (1,000 Ci) |
| 0.0037 TBq to 0.037 TBq/L (0.1 Ci to 1.0 Ci/L) | | | 3.7 TBq (100 Ci) |
| >0.037 TBq/L (1.0 Ci/L) | | | 0.037 TBq (1.0 Ci) |
| Other Liquids | 10−3 A2 | 10−1 A2 | 10−4 A2 |
| Gases: | | | |
| Tritium2 | 2 × 10−2 A2 | 2 × 10−1 A2 | 2 × 10−2 A2 |
| Special form | 10−3 A1 | 10−2 A1 | 10−3 A1 |
| Normal form | 10−3 A2 | 10−2 A2 | 10−3 A2 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 For mixtures of radionuclides see [§ 173.433(d)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-173.433#p-173.433(d)). | | | |
| 2 These values also apply to tritium in activated luminous paint and tritium adsorbed on solid carriers. | | | |

[Amdt. 173-244, [60 FR 50307](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-50307), Sept. 28, 1995, as amended by Amdt. 173-244, [61 FR 20751](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-20751), May 8, 1996; [63 FR 52849](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-52849), Oct. 1, 1998; [65 FR 58630](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-58630), Sept. 29, 2000; [66 FR 45383](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-45383), Aug. 28, 2001; [69 FR 3676](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-3676), Jan. 26, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Patent No. 7,016,292 entitled “Geometry for Optical Data Storage,” issued on March 21, 2006. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention.

# ADDRESSES:

Office of Research and Technology Applications, SDMC-RDTC-TDL (Ms. Susan D. McRae), Bldg. 5220, Von Braun Complex, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Joan Gilsdorf, Patent Attorney, e-mail:                         *joan.gilsdorf@smdc.army.mil,*                         (256) 955-3213 or Ms. Susan D. McRae, Office of Research and Technology Applications, e-mail:                         *susan.mcrae@smdc.army.mil;*                         (256) 955-1501.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention pertains to an optical data storage device having an optically readable disk with a body extending in a radial direction from a central axis. The body has a side and an elongated portion that extends along the side. The elongated portion includes a first side surface and a second side surface. A plurality of optically readable discontinuities may be located on each of the first side surface and the second side surface of the elongated portion.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-3396 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, March 13, 1995 (43), Para 43.5 Adjournment]
[Page 375]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.43.5  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. MILLER of California, pursuant to the special order 
agreed to on Friday, March 10, 1995, at 3 o'clock and 16 minutes p.m., 
the House adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 14, 1995.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

#### § 107.301 Delegated authority for enforcement.

Under redelegation from the Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, the Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety and the Office of the Chief Counsel exercise their authority for enforcement of the Federal hazardous material transportation law, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, this subchapter, and subchapters B and C of this chapter, in accordance with § 1.97 of this title.

[84 FR 6947, Feb. 28, 2019]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Peoples Heritage Financial Group, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-22205, 33-22206, 33-80310, 333-17467 and 333-46367) on Form S-8 of Peoples
Heritage Financial Group, Inc. of our report, dated January 14, 1998,
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Peoples Heritage Financial Group, Inc.



                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 1998
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 7, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 17, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending August 18, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
March 23 , 2015

Mr. Bruce Beard

Bruce Beard LLC

14770 Sam Reynolds Road

Justin, TX 76247

Dear Mr. Beard :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 13 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of Bruce Beard LLC into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 00 69 , but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to conside r the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Michael G. Rubin, Co-President and Chief Executive Officer of GSI Commerce, Inc., certify
that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of GSI
Commerce, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report; and



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



|                |  |     |  |                                         
|--------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|August 23, 2004 |  |    
|                |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Rubin                    
|                |  |     |  | Michael G. Rubin                        
|                |  |     |  | Co-President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued our report dated March 18, 2005,accompanying the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 and the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004 included in the Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc.and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Royal BodyCare, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No.333-109723).

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 24, 2006
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
 Dated: November 7, 2008/s/ Patrick J. Moty
    
    
    
    /s/ Linda J. MilesPatrick J. Moty
    
    
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 86-2, PageID.826 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 1
#### The State of New Hampshire *v.*Hollis.

Actions to recover pay for the board of prisoners at the reform school should be brought in the name of *“*The Reform School.”

It is no defence to an action against a town for the hoard of a prisoner committed to the reform school from it, that the proceedings before the magistrate, which resulted in his committal, were defective, if the mittimus was regular on its face, and no objection was taken by the prisoner to the prior proceedings.

Assumpsit, to recover for the board of a prisoner committed to the reform school from the defendant town. Facts found by a referee.

The action was in the name of the state.' The defendants demurred, but the referee overruled the demurrer, and they excepted. The complaint against the prisoner and the warrant on which he was arrested were defective, but he made no objection, and when arraigned pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to the reform school for one year. Under this sentence he was committed from the defendant town on a mittimus, regular in form, issued by a justice of the peace residing in that town. The defendants claimed that, as the complaint and warrant were defective, they were not liable.

*391Fasseil, for tbe plaintiffs.

*A. W. Sawyer*and *Stevens Sf*Parker, for the defendants.

Stanley, J.

The prisoner was committed to the reform school from Hollis by order of a justice of the peace. In such cases the statute provides that the town from which the person was committed shall be liable to pay for his board, and may recover it of the parent or guardian of such person, or of the town or county liable for his support, as if he were a pauper. Gen. St., *c.*269, *ss.*23, 24.

But the defendants say that the proceedings before the justice were irregular, unauthorized, and defective, and therefore they are excused from the liability imposed by the statute. The defects complained of were such as might be waived by the respondent, and they were waived if he did not seasonably object. They were defects of "which he alone could complain. They were all of such a character that they might have been remedied.

The warrant of commitment was regular on its face and in all its essential requisites, and the superintendent of the reform school could not have refused to receive the prisoner. He was not required to examine the preliminary proceedings to see if they were regular. *Merrimack County*v. Jaffrey, 58 N. H. 426.

The action should have been in the name of the reform school, and not in the name of the state. Gen. St., *c.*269, *s.*1. This objection may, however, be avoided by an amendment *(Folsom*v. *Ins. Co.,*59 N. H. 54), and there may then be

*Judgment for the plaintiffs.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 17, 1995 (68), Para 68.7 Regulatory Rulemaking Actions]
[Pages 749-750]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.68.7  regulatory rulemaking actions

  Mr. CLINGER, pursuant to the special order heretofore agreed to, moved 
to take from the Speaker's table the bill of the Senate (S. 219) to 
ensure economy and efficiency of Federal Government operations by 
establishing a moratorium on regulatory rulemaking actions, and for 
other purposes; strike all after the enacting clause of said bill, and 
insert the text of H.R. 450, as passed by the House.
  After debate,

[[Page 750]]

  Pursuant to said order the previous question was considered as 
ordered.
  The quetion being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EMERSON, announced that the yeas had it.
  The bill, as amended, was ordered to be read a third time, was read a 
third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said bill, as amended, was 
passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
amendment.
  By unanimous consent, House Resolution 148, was laid on the table.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 15, 1995 (45), Para 45.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 388]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.45.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. MURTHA:

       Add the following Section to the end of the bill:

         ``savings to be used exclusively for deficit reduction

       ``Sec. 302. An amount equal to the net budget authority 
     reduced in this Act is hereby appropriated into the Deficit 
     Reduction Fund established pursuant to Executive Order 12858 
     to be used exclusively to reduce the Federal deficit: 
     Provided, That such amount is designated by Congress as an 
     emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(D)(i) of 
     the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
     1985, as amended.'' 

It was decided in the

Yeas

421

affirmative

Nays

1
```
§ 174.680 Division 6.1 (poisonous) materials with foodstuffs. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a carrier may not transport any package bearing a POISON or POISON INHALATION HAZARD label in the same car with any material marked as, or known to be, a foodstuff, feed or any other edible material intended for consumption by humans or animals.
( b ) A carrier must separate any package bearing a POISON label displaying the text “PG III,” or bearing a “PG III” mark adjacent to the POISON label, from materials marked as or known to be foodstuffs, feed or any other edible materials intended for consumption by humans or animals, as required in § 174.81(e)(3) for classes identified with the letter “O” in the Segregation Table for Hazardous Materials.
[64 FR 10781, Mar. 5, 1999]