alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exh_1012.htm


EXHIBIT 10.12


 








 


THIS NOTE AND THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”).  THEY MAY NOT BE RESOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AS TO THE SECURITIES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.  THIS NOTE MUST BE SURRENDERED TO THE COMPANY OR ITS TRANSFER AGENT AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO THE SALE, PLEDGE OR OTHER TRANSFER OF ANY INTEREST HEREIN.







MEDISTEM INC


PROMISSORY NOTE







 



	$500,000	San Diego, California
	 	August 19, 2013





 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Medistem, Inc. (the “Company”) promises to pay to Randber LLC (the “Lender”), or order, the principal sum of up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), together with interest on the unpaid principal hereof from the date of such advance at the rate of 5% per annum, compounded semiannually.


 


This loan may revert in the following options:


 


1. The outstanding principal shall be due and payable two years from the date stated on this Note.  Payments of principal and interest shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America.


 


2. The use of these funds is RESTRICTED.  Prior to the use of these funds approval by Vladimir Zaharchook, our Vice-Chairman of the Board of Dirctors, or his registered assigns, is required.


 


3. Furthermore, should the Company breach the RESTRICTED covenant, the note shall become payable on demand and Lender may, upon 24 hour written notice to the Company, use the funds in account number XXXXXXXXXXXXto satisfy this Note.


 


4. The loan may be extended for additional period of time if both the Lender and the Company agree.


 


5. The Lender may convert the principal and the interest due on this Note into shares of Common Stock of the Company at any time at a price of $0.50 per share.


 




 





Convertible Note Agreement 1











 







 




6. Should any action be instituted for the collection of this Note, the reasonable costs and attorneys' fees therein of the holder shall be paid by the undersigned.


 


Agreement becomes effective upon receipt of $500,000 by Medistem.  Wire instructions are as follows:


 


Bank: XXXXXXXXX


Account Name: Medistem Inc


Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXX


Routing Number:  XXXXXXXXX


 







 







 


/s/______________________________________


Alan J. Lewis, Ph.D.


Chief Executive Officer


Medistem Inc


9255 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 450


San Diego


CA 92122


 


 


 


 


  

Convertible Note Agreement 2
#### James Burnett v. The State.

*No. 50.*

*Decided April 22.*

Incest — Evidence as to Sexual Acts. — In prosecutions for incest or for cognate offenses of any class, evidence is admissible of sexual acts between the same parties prior to, or, when indicating continuousness of *illicit*relations, subsequent to, the act specifically under trial.

Appeal from the District Court of Gonzales. Tried below before Hon. AT. Kennon, Special Judge.

The indictment charged appellant, James Burnett, and his daughter, Jeanett Burnett, jointly with incest. At the trial appellant was convicted, and his punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary, and Jeanett Burnett, the codefendant, was found not guilty and discharged.

Defendant’s bill of exceptions was raised to the action of the court in permitting the witness Betty Rogers, over his objections, to testify to an act of carnal intercourse between them (the parties) witnessed by her at a different time and place to the act testified to by the witness Dan Mixon as having been seen by him; the objection being that the second act was a separate and distinct offense from the one charged by the State, and the testimony was calculated to prejudice the defendant before the jury.

*Glass &*Burgess, for appellant.

The court erred in admitting the testimony of Betty Rogers, for the reason stated in the bill of exceptions. 1 Greenl. on Ev., sec. 53, and note; Blackwell v. The State, 29 Texas Cr. App., 194; McKinney v. The State, 8 Texas Cr. App., 626; Guajardo v. The State, 24 Texas Cr. App., 603; Coward v. The State, 24 Texas Cr. App., 590; Carter v. The State, 23 Texas Cr. App., 508; Mayfield v. The State, 23 Texas Cr. App., 645; Davis v. The State, 23 Texas Cr. App., 210; House v. The State, 16 Texas Cr. App., 25; Welhousen v. The State, 30 Texas Cr. App., 624.

*87
      *M. L.*Henry, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

SIMKENS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of incest, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary, from which he appeals. The sole question raised in the case is, whether the State can prove the crime of incest by evidence of more than one act. This is not an open question. It is well settled, that in prosecutions for adultery, or for illicit intercourse of any class, evidence is admissible of sexual acts between the same parties prior to, or, when indicating continuousness of illicit relations, even subsequent to, the act specifically under trial. Whart. Crim. Ev., sec. 35. The testimony tends strongly to establish illicit relations, long continued, between the parties, and, if true, there can be no question of appellant’s guilt. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
#### Janvrin *v.*Janvrin.

A wife may be entitled to alimony when a divorce is decreed against her, even if not entitled to a divorce against her husband.

An ante-nuptial agreement that she shall have a certain sum after his decease, in lieu of all claim against his estate, is no bar to alimony.

Evidence as to the value of his estate, and the conduct of the parties towards each other, is competent on the question of alimony.

Libel foe Djvoboe, alleging the causo of desertion. The libellee, who was the wife, asked for alimony, and, subject to exception, introduced evidence as to the value of her husband’s estate and acts of cruelty, which were the same acts alleged by her in a former petition, which had been denied. There was an ante-nuptial agreement that she should have certain property within three months after his decease, in lieu of all claim against his estate. A divorce was decreed against her, and she was allowed as alimony $1,490, which included the value of the property named in the ante-nuptial agreement, and the probable expense of her support during his life. To this allowance the libellant excepted.

Hatch, for the libellant.

*SticJcney*and *Wiygin*Eernald, for the libellee.

Bingham, J.

Upon any decree of divorce, the court may order the husband to pay the wife such sum of money as maybe deemed just, even when a divorce is decreed against her, and she is not entitled to a divorce against him. Gen. St., *c.*163. *s.*12; *Sheafe*v. *Sheafe,*24 N. H. 564; *Sheafe*v. Laighton, 36 N. H. 240; 2 Bish. Mar. & Div., s. 378.

Evidence as to the conduct of the parties toward each other, and the value of the husband’s estate, was competent on the question of alimony. Gen. St., *c.*163, *s.*12. His duty to support her was properly considered in determining the amount of alimony. 2 Bish. Mar. & Div., *s.*369; *Morrison*v. Morrison, 49 N. H. 73.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley, *J.,*did not sit: the others concurred.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 The
undersigned officers of Green Builders, Inc., a Texas corporation (the
“Company”), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge:
  1.           The
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
  /s/ Clark
      WilsonClark
      WilsonPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerDecember 23, 2008
   /s/ Cindy
      HammesCindy
      HammesPrincipal
      Financial OfficerDecember 23, 2008
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., General Partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of RichmanTax
      Credit Properties Inc., generalpartner
      of Richman Tax Credit PropertiesL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantJune
      24, 2010
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 29, 2012

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|N.A. CORPORATION        | CIC           | Change in Control notice by James and Nita Wallenfelsz, both of North Oaks, Minnesota, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of N.A. Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly gain control of North American Banking Company, Roseville, Minnesota.                                                    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/07/2013
|Newspaper:              | Not available
|Federal Register:       | 01/07/2013   
|NEISEN BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Retroactive Change in Control notice by David L. Neisen, Watkins, Minnesota, individually and as trustee of four Neisen family trusts, to retain 25 percent or more of the shares of Neisen Bancshares, Inc., Watkins, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Farmers State Bank of Watkins, Watkins, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/07/2013
|Newspaper:              | Not available
|Federal Register:       | 01/07/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1332.2 Availability of contracts.

Upon request from any member of the public to inspect a contract(s) or agreement(s) described in § 1332.1, at any time between the effective date of such contract(s) or agreement(s) and 15 days prior thereto, the Board will obtain the requested contract(s) or agreement(s) from the U.S. Postal Service and make it (them) available for inspection.

[57 FR 23539, June 4, 1992]
#### William Rickets, *as*Receiver, *v.*Gerhard Wessels.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 1, 2014

----

Testimony and Statements            Monetary Policy -- statement by Chair Yellen before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the semiannual monetary policy report to the Congress.            -Published, February 27, 2014            Bank Branches, Domestic            Compass Bank, Birmingham, Alabama -- petition for review of an application to establish a branch in The Woodlands, Texas, approved by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta under delegated authority.            -Denied, February 26, 2014            Forms            Forms -- final Board review to implement the Surveys of Consumer and Community Affairs Publications and Resources (FR 1378) and Consumer and Stakeholder Surveys (FR 3073).            -Approved, February 28, 2014            Regulations and Policies            Stress Testing -- final interagency guidance to describe supervisory expectations for Dodd-Frank Act stress tests conducted by banking organizations with total consolidated assets of between $10 billion and $50 billion.            -Approved, February 25, 2014            Enforcement            Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., Norfolk, Virginia, and Bank of Hampton Roads -- written agreement dated June 9, 2010, terminated February 20, 2014.            -Announced, February 25, 2014                        Metropolitan Bank Holding Corporation, New York, New York -- written agreement dated January 4, 2011, terminated February 21, 2014.            -Announced, February 25, 2014                        Trivoli Bancorp, Trivoli, Illinois -- written agreement dated April 30, 2010, terminated February 24, 2014.            -Announced, February 27, 2014            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*James Cottrell, *Appellants, v.*The Commissioners of the Department of Fire and Buildings of the City of Brooklyn, *Respondents*.

Order affirming proceedings of commissioners and dismissing writ of *certiorari*reversed, and relator restored. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.17 American Overseas Interests]
[Page 828]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.17  american overseas interests

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaHOOD, pursuant to House Resolution 155 
and House Resolution 156 and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for the 
further consideration of the bill (H.R. 1561) to consolidate the foreign 
affairs agencies of the United States; to authorize appropriations for 
the Department of State and related agencies for fiscal years 1996 and 
1997; to responsibly reduce the authorizations of appropriations for 
United States foreign assistance programs for fiscal years 1996 and 
1997, and for other purposes.
  Mr. GOODLATTE, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

136793 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices

v SC: 136793 COA: 278278 Oakland CC: 2007-213389-FH DAMINGO F. BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DAMINGO FLEECION BOURGEIOS, a/k/a DAMINGO FLEECION BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DAMNGO FLEECAION BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DEAN BOURGEOIS, a/k/a DERON SHORT, a/k/a DOMINGO FELECIANO BOURGEOIS, a/k/a TAIJON BOURGEOIS, a/k/a WILLIE B. JONES, a/k/a WILLIE JONE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 6, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
§ 1515.1 Scope. ( a ) *Appeal.* This part applies to applicants who are appealing an Initial Determination of Threat Assessment or an Initial Determination of Threat Assessment and Immediate Revocation in a security threat assessment (STA) as described in each of the following: ( 1 ) 49 CFR part 1572 for a hazardous materials endorsement (HME) or a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC).
( 2 ) 49 CFR part 1540, subpart C, which includes individuals engaged in air cargo operations who work for certain aircraft operators, foreign air carriers, indirect air carriers (IACs), or certified cargo screening facilities.
( b ) *Waivers.* This part applies to applicants for an HME or TWIC who undergo a security threat assessment described in 49 CFR part 1572 and are eligible to request a waiver of certain standards.
[72 FR 3588, Jan. 25, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 47695, Sept. 16, 2009; 76 FR 51867, Aug. 18, 2011]
ATU 10-K 08.31.2013 EX 10.10 (c)




Exhibit 10.10(c)


AMENDMENT TO
ACTUANT CORPORATION
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
FOR
DAVID L. SCHEER
This Amendment is made as of July 23, 2013 (the “Effective Date”) between Actuant Corporation (the “Corporation”), a Wisconsin corporation and David L. Scheer (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS the Corporation and the Executive wish to amend the Change in Control Agreement between the Corporation and the Executive dated April 30, 2012 (the “Agreement”);
THEREFORE, the Corporation and the Executive hereby amend the Agreement as follows:
1.Section 2(a)(iv) of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace the period at the end thereof with a semicolon and to insert “or” after the semicolon.
2.    Section 2(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding at the end thereof the following:
(v) the date that any one person or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in paragraph (i)(5)(v)(B) of Treasury Regulation Section 1. 409A-3(i)(5)) that is not an affiliate of the Corporation acquires ownership of a majority of the business operations of the Electrical Segment of the Corporation, whether by way of purchase of stock or assets, merger or consolidation or otherwise.
3.    Except as set forth above, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.
	
		
	EXECUTIVE:




/s/ David L. Scheer            
David L. Scheer
	ACTUANT CORPORATION




By:   /s/ Sherri Grissom         


Title:   Executive VP – Human Resources   











DM_US 43532322-1.065322.0010
Communications 

Workers of America 

AFL-CIO, DISTRICT 1 

80 Pine Street, 37th Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

212-344-2515 

Fax: 21 2-425-294 7 

Fax: 212-509-7341 

Lawrence R. Cohen 

President 

Christopher M. Shelton 

Vice President 

District 1 

·········································································································································································· 

OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT 

April 21, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: 

I'm writing in support of.union members in the New York, New Jersey and New England region-and 

around the ration-whose jobs are threatened by unfair practices by foreign airlines. 

As _you're aware, some foreign airlines, including Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline, 

receive massive subsidies from their governments. This allows them to undercut competitors' prices on 

key international routes-which means U.S. carriers like American, Delta and United lose market share. 

Lost revenue can mean lost jobs, and in many cases, lost union jobs. 

With the help of nearly $40 billion in government subsidies these Middle East carriers are tipping the 

scales in their favor- and U.S. airlines are losing out: In fact, each international round-trip flight that is 

lost or forgone because of this unfair imbalance results in the average loss of eight hundred American 

jobs. Further, by limiting their employees' rights to collectively bargain, Qatar, Etihad and Emirates 

receive what amounts to a $3.1 billion subsidies in below market labor costs. 

My understanding is that these practices are not in line with the Open Skies agreements the U.S. has in 

place. 1 request that you take action to open consultations with Qatar and the UAE on this issue and, in 

the meantime, request a freeze on new capacity from the Gulf carriers to the U.S. 

s 10-150427-008 
}??ly, 

~eto Vice President 

Communications Workers of America District 1 

Cc: 

Senator Charles Schumer 

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand 

Representative Steve Israel 

Representative Joseph Crowley 

Representative Gregory Meeks 

Representative Grace Meng 

Representative Sean Patrick Maloney 

Representative Jerrold Nadler 

Representative Nita Lowey 

Representative Jose Serrano 

Representative Eliot Engel 

Representative Peter King 

Governor Andrew Cuomo 

Mayor Bill de Blasia 

s 10-150427-008