alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1540.201 Applicability and terms used in this subpart. ( a ) This subpart includes the procedures that certain aircraft operators, foreign air carriers, indirect air carriers, and certified cargo screening facilities must use to have security threat assessments performed on certain individuals pursuant to 49 CFR 1544.228, 1546.213, 1548.7, 1548.15, 1548.16 and 1549.111. This subpart applies to the following: ( 1 ) Each aircraft operator operating under a full program or full all-cargo program described in 49 CFR 1544.101(a) or (h).
( 2 ) Each foreign air carrier operating under a program described in 49 CFR 1546.101(a), (b), or (e).
( 3 ) Each indirect air carrier operating under a security program described in 49 CFR part 1548.
( 4 ) Each applicant applying for unescorted access to cargo under one of the programs described in (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section.
( 5 ) Each proprietor, general partner, officer, director, or owner of an indirect air carrier as described in 49 CFR 1548.16.
( 6 ) Each certified cargo screening facility described in 49 CFR part 1549.
( 7 ) Each individual a certified cargo screening facility authorizes to perform screening or supervise screening.
( 8 ) Each individual the certified cargo screening facility authorizes to have unescorted access to cargo at any time from the time it is screened until the time it is tendered to an indirect air carrier under 49 CFR part 1548, an aircraft operator under part 1544, or a foreign air carrier under part 1546.
( 9 ) The senior manager or representative of its facility in control of the operations of a certified cargo screening facility under 49 CFR part 1549.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart— *Applicant* means the individuals listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
*Operator* means an aircraft operator, foreign air carrier, and indirect air carrier listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section, and a certified cargo screening facility described in paragraph (a)(6) of this section.
( c ) An applicant poses a security threat under this subpart when TSA determines that he or she is known to pose or is suspected of posing a threat— ( 1 ) To national security;
( 2 ) To transportation security; or
( 3 ) Of terrorism.
[74 FR 47700, Sept. 16, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 51867, Aug. 18, 2011]
Exhibit 10.10


                                 AMENDMENT TO
                1991 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN
                           EFFECTIVE AUGUST 2, 1995

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the definition of "Date of Entitlement" in the 
Directors' Plan is amended to be and read in its entirety as follows:

           "Date of Entitlement" means the date as of which as director 
becomes entitled to receive an Option under this Plan, as determined in 
paragraph 5 hereof, which date shall be deemed to be the date of the grant of 
such Option.

; and

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 6(d)(iii), as follows, shall be added to 
the Directors' Plan:

          (iii) A Director who is subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange 
Act may avail himself of the alternative methods of payment set forth in 
Section 6(d)(i) and Section 6(d)(ii) this Plan only if such Director (i) 
makes an irrevocable election to use such payment method at least six months 
prior to the effective date of the transaction or (ii) if such transaction is 
effected during a period beginning on the third business day following the 
date of release for publication of the Company's quarterly or annual summary 
statements of sales and earnings and ending on the twelfth business day 
following such date.
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 173.300 [Reserved]
#### Frank S. Williams, Respondent, *v.*Charles Bettels, Appellant.

*Williams*v. *Bettels,*134 App. Div. 983, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an. appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 23, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for goods sold and delivered.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by section 1325 of *520the Code of Civil Procedure, and had not been perfected by filing the required undertaking.

*Walter H. Dodd*for motion.

*Gates Hamburger*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
#### § 45.157 Scuppers and gravity drains.

Scuppers and gravity deck drains from spaces above the freeboard deck that penetrate the shell below a line 24′′ or .05B above the summer loadline, whichever is greater, must have an automatic nonreturn valve. This valve may be omitted if the piping is of thickness not less than extra heavy pipe.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.6 Message from the Senate]
[Page 1104]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.6  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed with amendments in which the 
concurrence of the House is requested, bills of the House of the 
following titles:

       H.R. 400. An Act to provide for the exchange of lands 
     within Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, and 
     for other purposes; and
       H.R. 716. An Act to amend the Fishermen's Protective Act.

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed bills of the 
following titles, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 533. An Act to clarify the rules governing removal of 
     cases to Federal court, and for other purposes; and
       S. 677. An Act to repeal a redundant venue provision, and 
     for other purposes.
```
§ 1018.80 Reporting discharged debts to the Internal Revenue Service. When the Board discharges a debt for less than the full value of the indebtedness, it will report the outstanding balance discharged, not including interest to the Internal Revenue Service, using IRS Form 1099-G or any other form prescribed by the IRS, when: ( a ) The principal amount of the debt not in dispute is $600 or more;
( b ) The obligation has not been discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding; and
( c ) The obligation is no longer collectible either because the time limit in the applicable statute for enforcing collection expired during the tax year, or because during the tax year a formal compromise agreement was reached in which the debtor was legally discharged of all or a portion of the obligation.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY COUNCIL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT

ENFORCEMENT and VANESSA GETHERS
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 2212

[ November 22, 2017 ]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement; DOAH Case No. 17

- 002993

- CS; and CSE Case No.

2001078022

.

Anthony Council, Hollywood, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

C IKLIN
, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### John Paine *et al., Commissioner of Highways, Respondents, v.*Thomas East, *Appellant*.

Judgment of the Monroe County Court affirming the judgment of a municipal court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, J.;

Smith, P. J., not participating in the decision.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1033

In re: JAMES WILLIAM PAUL SANDERSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(7:10-cr-00144-D-1; 7:17-cv-00196-D)

Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 19, 2019

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James William Paul Sanderson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James William Paul Sanderson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the 

district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record 

reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending June 18, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|1ST BK, SIDNEY, MONTANA       | 564856 | 01/31/2011 | 06/07/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|AMERICAN BK, BOZEMAN, MONTANA | 630555 | 02/07/2011 | 06/08/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 8, 1995 (76), Para 76.21 U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform Membership]
[Page 886]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.76.21  u.s. commission on immigration reform membership

  On motion of Mr. SMITH of Texas, by unanimous consent, the Committee 
of the Whole House on the state of the Union was discharged from further 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 962) to amend the Immigration Act of 
1990 relating to the membership of the United States Commission on 
Immigration Reform.
  When said bill was considered and read twice.
  Mr. SMITH of Texas submitted the following amendment which was then 
agreed to:

       Page 1, line 6: Strike out ``to be appointed''.

  The bill, as amended, was ordered to be engrossed and read a third 
time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7443

JOSYLAN CONGREAVES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID CHESTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-99-258-5-F)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Richard Nordman, Westerville, Ohio, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* To the extent Congreaves alleges ineffective assistance

based on counsel’s failure to note a timely appeal, his claim is

not cognizable because there is no right to counsel in a habeas

corpus proceeding, and thus no right to effective assistance of

counsel. See, e.g., Mackall v. Angelone, 131 F.3d 442, 446-49 (4th

2

PER CURIAM:

Josylan Congreaves filed an untimely notice of appeal of the

district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (1994)

complaint challenging his federal sentence. We dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are

governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). These periods are "mandatory

and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions in which the

United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party are

accorded sixty days within which to file in the district court

notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(1). Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). This appeal period may be

extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopened under Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on June 14, 1999;

Congreaves’ notice of appeal was filed on October 18, 1999, which

was beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Congreaves’ failure to

note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal periodleaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of

this appeal.* We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with
Cir. 1997).

3

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Energy Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Meetesh Patel, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

**** 

Date:  May 6, 2010                                                /s/ Meetesh Patel 

                                                                                Meetesh Patel

                                                                                President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 9, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
WEB

www.irs.gov 

Use la

WEB USE la

IRS del

PARA PRODUCTO

E INFORMACIÓ

DE IMPUESTO
PRODUCTOS EN ESPAÑOL

•	 Si desea productos e información sobre impuestos en 

español, seleccione el enlace titulado “Español”, en la 

esquina superior derecha en la página www.irs.gov.

VEA Y DESCARGUE

Seleccione “Forms and Publications >>” o acced

www.irs.gov/formspubs, en inglés.

•	 Si desea formularios e instrucciones, seleccione “Form 

and Instruction number (PDF)”, en inglés.

•	 Si desea publicaciones, seleccione “Publication number 

(PDF)”, en inglés.

•	 Si desea un índice de formularios, instrucciones y 

publicaciones por tema, seleccione “Topical index”. 

•	 Si desea formularios, instrucciones y publicaciones de 

años previos, seleccione “Previous years”, en inglés.

NÚMEROS TELEFÓNICOS ÚTILES

•	 Ayuda tributaria para personas físicas

•	 Audio impedidos (equipo TTY/TDD)

•	 Formularios y publicaciones tributarios

1-800-829-104

1-800-829-405

1-800-829-367

PEDIDO EN LÍNEA

Si desea pedir productos tributarios para envío po

correo, acceda www.irs.gov/formspubs, en inglés

•	 Si desea productos para el año actual, seleccione “Form

and publications by U.S. mail”, en inglés.

•	 Si desea un juego de formularios e instrucciones de 

impuestos, seleccione “Tax packages”, en inglés.

•	 Si desea productos para empleadores (por ejemplo, el 

Formulario W-4(SP) o la Publicación 15) y declaraciones 

informativas (por ejemplo, el Formulario W-2, W-3 o la 

serie de Formularios 1099), seleccione “Employer forms 

and instructions”, en inglés.

•	 Si desea productos tributarios en un DVD, seleccione 

“Tax products on DVD (Pub. 1796)”, en inglés.

Acceda www.irs.gov,

en inglés, para ver información sobre 

los impuestos federales 

WEB 

Publication 4604-SP (1-2010) Catalog Number 54438W

Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service www.irs.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.17



                          PROVIDER SERVICES AGREEMENT
                              DATED APRIL 13, 1995
                                    between
                   TENNESSEE MENTAL HEALTH COOPERATIVE, INC.
                                      and
                             CASE MANAGEMENT, INC.


[This agreement is substantially identical in all material respects to the
Provider Services Agreement dated April 13, 1995 between Tennessee Mental Health
Cooperative, Inc. and Mental Health Cooperative, Inc. filed herewith as Exhibit
10.15, except that the party contracting with the Company's subsidiary is Case
Management, Inc. and except that this agreement is modified by the Addendum to
Management and Affiliation Agreement filed as part of Exhibit 10.16 (including
an amended effective date of October 1, 1995).]
§ 176.220 Smoking or open flame and posting of warning signs. ( a ) Smoking or the use of open flame is prohibited in any hold or compartment containing a Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material, near any Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material stowed on deck, or near any ventilator leading to a hold containing this material.
( b ) A sign carrying the legend: FLAMMABLE VAPORS KEEP LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY NO SMOKING
must be conspicuously posted at each approach to an “on deck” Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material stowage area and near each cargo hold ventilator leading to a hold containing this material. The sign must be painted on a white background using red letters. The letters may not be less than 8 cm (3 inches) high.
§ 78.47-10 Manual alarm boxes. ( a ) In all new installations, manual alarm boxes shall be clearly and permanently marked “IN CASE OF FIRE BREAK GLASS.” Existing boxes not so marked with the same or equivalent wording, shall be identified either on the box or adjacent bulkhead in at least 1 ⁄ 2 inch letters “IN CASE OF FIRE BREAK GLASS.” All manual alarm boxes shall be numbered in red on the adjacent bulkhead with at least 1 ⁄ 2 inch figures. The number shall agree with the number of the zone.
( b ) [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending May 15, 2010

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF COMMERCE    | * 18C* Branch  | Bank of Commerce, Chanute, Kansas, to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of The Eastern Colorado Bank, Cheyenne Wells, Colorado, and incident thereto, to establish a branch. | Newspaper:06/07/2010Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:          | 06/07/2010    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable
|FIRST NATIONAL BANK | Member         | First National Bank (to be known as First Community Bank, Beemer, Nebraska, to convert from a national to a state charter bank and retain its membership with the Federal Reserve.                | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIDELITY ST B&TC, DODGE CITY, KANSAS | 638850 | 02/08/2010 | 05/10/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us