alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1880

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 102 South

McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 16, 1995

Mr. LAHOOD (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr.

GUTIERREZ, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. HYDE, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. YATES, Mr. PORTER, Mr. WELLER, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. FAWELL, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. EWING, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. EVANS, Mr.

POSHARD, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 102 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ‘‘Edward

Madigan Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building located at 102

5 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1880 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post

6 Office Building’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1901 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1901

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
delay the implementation of remedial action and design for a particular 
Superfund site for one year while undertaking monitoring and testing to 
              determine whether further action is needed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1995

   Mr. Rose introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
      Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
delay the implementation of remedial action and design for a particular 
Superfund site for one year while undertaking monitoring and testing to 
              determine whether further action is needed.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ONE-YEAR DELAY OF REMEDIAL ACTION AND DESIGN ON CERTAIN 
              SUPERFUND SITE.

    (a) One-Year Delay Required.--The Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall delay implementation of any 
remedial action and design for the Burn Pit Superfund Site (located at 
New Hanover County Airport, North Carolina) for a period of one year, 
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Monitoring and Testing Required.--During the one-year period 
referred to in subsection (a), the Administrator shall monitor and test 
the Burn Pit Superfund Site (including groundwater) for contamination, 
including contamination by benzene. At the end of the one-year period, 
the Administrator shall determine whether the level of contamination at 
the site is acceptable.
    (c) Prohibition on Further Action and Relief From Liability.--If 
the level of contamination is determined to be acceptable under 
subsection (b) for the Site--
            (1) the Administrator may not implement any further 
        remedial action or design for the Site after the one-year 
        period referred to in subsection (a); and
            (2) the potentially responsible parties for the Site shall 
        have no further liability for the Site under the Comprehensive 
        Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 
        1980.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21.0


                           Subsidiaries of Registrant





                                 Subsidiaries of

                            OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.

             Camrose Pipe Company (a partnership) - Alberta, Canada (3)
                       Camrose Pipe Corporation - Delaware
          GlassificationTM International, Ltd. (a partnership) - Oregon
                            New CF&I, Inc. - Delaware (1)
                    Oregon Steel de Guayana, Inc. - Delaware
                       OSM GlassificationTM, Inc. - Oregon
                  CF&I Steel, L.P. (a partnership) - Delaware -
                  dba Rocky Mountain Steel Mills (2)
                 Colorado & Wyoming Railway Company - Delaware.

(1)  The Company owns 87% of New CF&I, Inc.

(2)  New CF&I, the general partner of CF&I, owns 95.2% and 100% of the
     equity interest in CF&I and Colorado & Wyoming Railway Company,
     respectively.  In addition, the Company directly owns 4.3% of the
     equity interest in CF&I Steel, L.P.

(3)  The Company owns 60% of Camrose Pipe Company.


The Company owns 100% of all remaining subsidiaries listed.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.67 Exceptions for Division 1.1 jet perforating guns. ( a ) Notwithstanding the requirements of § 173.56(b), Division 1.1 jet perforating guns may be classed and approved by the Associate Administrator without prior examination and offered for transportation if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The jet perforating guns are manufactured in accordance with the applicable requirements in AESC/IME JPG Standard (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter);
( 2 ) The jet perforating gun must be of a type described in the AESC/IME JPG Standard;
( 3 ) The applicant applies in writing to the Associate Administrator following the applicable requirements in the AESC/IME JPG Standard, and is notified in writing by the Associate Administrator that the jet perforating gun has been classed, approved, and assigned an EX number. Each application must be complete and include all relevant background data, the applicable drawings, and any other pertinent information as described in the AESC/IME JPG Standard on each jet perforating gun for which approval is being requested. The manufacturer must sign the application and certify that the jet perforating gun for which approval is requested conforms to the AESC/IME JPG Standard and that the descriptions and technical information contained in the application are complete and accurate. If the application is denied, the applicant will be notified in writing of the reasons for the denial. The Associate Administrator may require that the jet perforating gun be examined as provided under § 173.56(b)(1).
( b ) [Reserved]
[85 FR 75713, Nov. 25, 2020]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 01-501 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN 

AND NORTHERN IRELAND 

Amending the Treaty of January 6, 1994 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington April 30 and May 1, 2001 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND 

Mutual Legal Assistance 

 Agreement amending the treaty of January 6, 1994. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 April 30 and May 1, 2001; 

 Entered into force May 1, 2001.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.336 Nitrogen dioxide, liquefied, or dinitrogen tetroxide, liquefied. ( a ) Nitrogen dioxide, liquefied, or dinitrogen tetroxide, liquefied, must be packaged in specification or UN cylinders as prescribed in § 173.192, except valves are not authorized. UN tubes and MEGCs are not authorized for use. Cylinders must be equipped with a stainless steel valve and valve seat that will not deteriorate in contact with nitrogen dioxide. Each valve opening must be closed by a solid metal plug with tapered thread properly luted to prevent leakage. Transportation in DOT 3AL cylinders is authorized only by highway and rail.
( b ) Each UN pressure receptacle must be cleaned in accordance with the requirements of ISO 11621 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter). Each DOT specification cylinder must be cleaned according to the requirements of GSA Federal Specification RR-C-901D, paragraphs 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter). Cleaning agents equivalent to those specified in RR-C-901D may be used; however, any cleaning agent must not be capable of reacting with oxygen. One cylinder selected at random from a group of 200 or fewer and cleaned at the same time must be tested for oil contamination in accordance with Specification RR-C-901D, paragraph 4.3.2 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter) and meet the standard of cleanliness specified therein.
[71 FR 33885, June 12, 2006]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992

To modify the Suwannee River navigation project, Florida, to authorize

dredging of the McGriff Pass instead of the East and Alligator Passes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1995

Mrs. THURMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To modify the Suwannee River navigation project, Florida,

to authorize dredging of the McGriff Pass instead of

the East and Alligator Passes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the navigation project for Suwannee River, Florida,

4 authorized by the Act entitled ‘‘An Act making appropria5 tions for the construction, repair, completion, and preser6 vation of certain works on rivers and harbors, and for

7 other purposes’’, approved June 14, 1880 (21 Stat. 191),

8 is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to

9 dredge the McGriff Pass (formerly known as ‘‘Wadley

10 Pass’’) instead of dredging the East Pass and Alligator
2

•HR 1992 IH

1 (West) Pass in accordance with the terms and conditions

2 which apply to the dredging of the East and Alligator

3 Passes.

Æ
§ 174.24 Shipping papers. ( a ) A person may not accept a hazardous material for transportation or transport a hazardous material by rail unless that person receives a shipping paper prepared in accordance with part 172 of this subchapter, unless the material is excepted from shipping paper requirements under this subchapter. Only an initial carrier within the United States must receive and retain a copy of the shipper's certification as required by § 172.204 of this subchapter. This section does not apply to a material that is excepted from shipping paper requirements by this subchapter.
( b ) Each person receiving a shipping paper required by this section must retain a copy or an electronic image thereof, that is accessible at or through its principal place of business and must make the shipping paper available, upon request, to an authorized official of a Federal, State, or local government agency at reasonable times and locations. For a hazardous waste, each shipping paper copy must be retained for three years after the material is accepted by the initial carrier. For all other hazardous materials, each shipping paper copy must be retained for one year after the material is accepted by the initial carrier. Each shipping paper copy must include the date of acceptance by the initial carrier. The date on the shipping paper may be the date a shipper notifies the rail carrier that a shipment is ready for transportation, as indicated on the waybill or bill of lading, as an alternative to the date the shipment is picked up, or accepted, by the carrier.
[67 FR 46128, July 12, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 66574, Nov. 1, 2002; 70 FR 73165, Dec. 9, 2005]
EXHIBIT 13



Report of Independent Accountants



To The Board of Directors and Shareholders

of BSB
Bancorp, Inc.:



In our opinion, the consolidated statements of income, changes
in shareholders equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001 (appearing on pages 55 through 83 of the BSB Bancorp, Inc. 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders which has been included in this Form 10-K) present fairly, in all material
respects, the results of operations and cash flows of BSB Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
|Syracuse, New York             
|January 25, 2002
*Monday, December 14, 1998*

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

98-1758.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish.

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to withdraw objections,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to withdraw objections be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that oral argument currently scheduled for December 16,1998, be canceled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000702756
<NAME> SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,053
<PP&E>                                           8,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,848
<BONDS>                                          1,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,121
<SALES>                                          4,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,801
<CGS>                                            3,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
unlimited_ex1011.htm


EXHBIT 10.11


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 




  





6











  






 





 




  





7











  






 





 




  





8
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Thursday, August 2, 2007; 6 p.m.

Place: Via Teleconference.

Public Call In Number: 1-800-597-7623.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of July 13, Meeting.
III. Announcements.
IV. Staff Director's Report.
V. Program Planning.
     FY 2007 Statutory Report.
VI. Future Agenda Items.
VII. Adjourn.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Manuel Alba, Press and 
Communications, (202) 376-8582.

    Dated: July 23, 2007.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-3663 Filed 7-23-07; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
97-1974.

#### State v. McNeill.

Lorain App. No. 95CA006158. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 457, 700 N.E.2d 613. On motion for *1429reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
§ 178.506 Standards for metal drums other than steel or aluminum. ( a ) The following are the identification codes for metal drums other than steel or aluminum: ( 1 ) 1N1 for a non-removable head metal drum; and
( 2 ) 1N2 for a removable head metal drum.
( b ) Construction requirements for metal drums other than steel or aluminum are as follows: ( 1 ) Body and heads must be constructed of metal (other than steel or aluminum) of suitable type and adequate thickness in relation to the capacity and the intended use of the drum. Minimum thickness and marking requirements in §§ 173.28(b)(4) and 178.503(a)(9) of this subchapter apply to drums intended for reuse.
( 2 ) All seams must be welded. Chime seams, if any, must be reinforced by the application of separate reinforcing rings.
( 3 ) The body of a drum of a capacity greater than 60 L (16 gallons) may have at least two expanded rolling hoops or two separate rolling hoops. If there are separate rolling hoops, the hoops must be fitted tightly on the body and so secured that they cannot shift. Rolling hoops may not be spot-welded.
( 4 ) Openings for filling, emptying, or venting in the bodies or heads of non-removable head (1N1) drums may not exceed 7.0 cm (3 inches) in diameter. Drums with larger openings are considered to be of the removable head type (1N2). Closures for openings in the bodies and heads of drums must be so designed and applied that they will remain secure and leakproof under normal conditions of transport. Closure flanges may be welded in place so that the weld provides a leakproof seam. Gaskets or other sealing elements must be used with closures unless the closure is inherently leakproof.
( 5 ) Closure devices for removable head drums must be so designed and applied that they remain secure and drums remain leakproof under normal conditions of transport. Gaskets or other sealing elements must be used with all removable heads.
( 6 ) If materials used for body, heads, closures, and fittings are not compatible with the contents to be transported, suitable internal protective coatings or treatments must be applied. These coatings or treatments must retain their protective properties under normal conditions of transport.
( 7 ) Maximum capacity of drum: 450 L (119 gallons).
( 8 ) Maximum net mass: 400 kg (882 pounds).
[Amdt. 178-97, 55 FR 52717, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66285, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 178-102, 59 FR 28494, June 2, 1994; 87 FR 45000, July 26, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.228 Bromine pentafluoride or bromine trifluoride. ( a ) Bromine pentafluoride and bromine trifluoride are authorized in packagings as follows: ( 1 ) Specification 3A150, 3AA150, 3B240, 3BN150, 4B240, 4BA240, 4BW240, and 3E1800 cylinders.
( 2 ) UN cylinders as specified in part 178 of this subchapter, except acetylene cylinders and non-refillable cylinders, with a minimum test pressure of 10 bar and a minimum outage of 8 percent by volume. The use of UN tubes and MEGCs is not authorized.
( 3 ) The use of a pressure relief device is not authorized.
( b ) A material in Hazard Zone A must be transported in a seamless specification cylinder conforming to the requirements of § 173.40. However, a welded cylinder filled before October 1, 2002, in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter in effect at the time of filling, may be transported for reprocessing or disposal of the cylinder's contents until December 31, 2003. No cylinder may be equipped with a pressure relief device.
[67 FR 51643, Aug. 8, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 61289, Sept. 30, 2002; 68 FR 24660, May 8, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 33881, June 12, 2006]
Director Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 Planar Systems, Inc. Director Compensation Plan 
  
 Nonemployee directors of the Company receive a $20,000 annual retainer plus $2,000 for attendance at each board meeting and
$1,500 for attendance at each committee meeting, including telephonic meetings. Audit Committee members receive an additional annual retainer of $2,000. Under certain circumstances, the nonemployee directors of the Company are reimbursed for
out-of-pocket and travel expenses incurred in attending Board meetings. Nonemployee directors participate in the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the “1993 Nonemployee Director Plan”). Under the 1993
Nonemployee Director Plan, a 10,000 share stock option is granted to each new nonemployee director at the time such person is first elected or appointed to the Board. In addition, each nonemployee director receives a stock option annually after each
annual meeting of shareholders. The size of each director’s annual option grant is based on his or her level of service on the Board of Directors. Each nonemployee director receives an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock. An
additional 2,000 share stock option is granted to the nonemployee director who is then serving as the Chairman of the Board of Directors or as the Lead Director. An additional 1,000 share stock option is granted to each nonemployee director who is
then serving as chairman of a committee of the Board. Mr. Stenger receives an additional 1,000 share stock option grant annually for his service as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company’s Finnish subsidiary.
#### § 1242.27 Coal marine terminals, ore marine terminals, TOFC/COFC terminals, other marine terminals, motor vehicle loading and distribution facilities, and facilities for other specialized service operations (accounts XX-13-29 to XX-13-35, inclusive).

These accounts pertain solely to freight service and contain no common expenses for separation herein.