alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1503.623 Withdrawal of complaint or request for hearing.

At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or a respondent may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent of the ALJ. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the ALJ must dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice, unless the withdrawing party shows good cause for dismissal without prejudice, except that a party may withdraw a request for hearing without prejudice at any time before a complaint has been filed.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 27, 2013

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK  | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a  branch at 6571 Broadway Avenue, Unit 8, Cleveland, OH. | Newspaper:04/16/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/16/2013    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|FIFTH THIRD BANK  | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a  branch at 12002 Anderson Road, Tampa, FL.              | Newspaper:04/16/2013Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/16/2013    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Council on Disability

# Type:

Quarterly Meeting. 

# Date and Time:

January 29-31, 2007, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. 

# Location:

Town and Country Resort and Convention Center, 500 Hotel Circle North, San Diego, California. 

# Status:

January 29, 2007, 9 a.m.-3:45 p.m.—Open. 

January 29, 2007, 3:45 p.m-4:30 p.m.—Closed. 

January 30-31, 2007, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.—Open. 

# Agenda:

Public Comments; Department of Defense, Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program Presentation; Veterans' Panel Presentation and Discussion; Livable Communities Panel Presentation; Foster Care Panel Presentation; Reports from the Chairperson and the Acting Co-Executive Directors; Team Reports; Unfinished Business; New Business; Announcements; Adjournment

# Sunshine Act Meeting Contact:

Mark S. Quigley, Director of Communications, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax). 

# Agency Mission:

NCD is an independent Federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families. NCD is composed of 15 members appointed by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. 

# Accommodations:

Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify NCD immediately. 

# Language Translation:

In accordance with E.O. 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, those people with disabilities who are limited English proficient and seek translation services for these meetings should notify NCD immediately. 

Dated: January 18, 2007. 

Mark S. Quigley, 

Acting Co-Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 07-324 Filed 1-22-07; 2:21 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, *v.*THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent. SAME, Appellant, *v.*THE NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

*Mandamus*— proper *mode of dismissal of application for, upon the failure of the people to prosecute.*

Appeals from orders made at Special Term, requiring tbe attorney-general to proceed with an application for peremptory writs of *mandamus*and setting the causes down for bearing.

Upon a previous appeal to tbe General *Term,*orders made at tbe Special Term quashing and dismissing petitions for a *ma/ndamus*bad been reversed. (28 Hun, 548.)

Tbe court at General Term said : *“*Tbe decision of tbe General Term reversing tbe ordérs of tbe court below, which denied tbe motions for *mandamus,*left those motions undisposed of in tbe court below. Tbe application on tbe part of tbe respondents to have those motions disposed of by tbe Special Term was proper; but when tbe moving parties came into court and declined to proceed with tbe motions, tbe Special Term should have denied tbe motions, with or without costs, in its discretion.

“ There was no special proceeding pending which entitled tbe respondents to have tbe case set down for trial at the Special Term. That was done by tbe order of tbe court below. They were like' ordinary motions noticed by a party who subsequently declines to proceed upon bis notice, and tbe disposition above suggested, to wit, by denying tbe motion, was tbe proper one to relieve tbe respondents from any further action on tbe part of tbe people.

“ Tbe order should therefore be modified by simply denying tbe motions noticed at Special Term for *mandamus,*and as so modified affirmed, without costs.”

*E. G.*James, for the appellant.

*William D. Shipman,*for the New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, respondent.

*79
      *Poscoe Conhling,*for the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, respondent.

Opinion

*Per Curiam.*

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ.

Orders modified as directed in opinion and affirmed as modified,, without costs.
#### In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York, Respondent, to Vacate an Order of the Supreme Court Directing the Clerk of New York County to Register Peter F. Mulvey, Appellant, as a Veterinary Surgeon, nunc pro tunc, as of December 31, 1890.

*Matter of Mulvey,*134 App. Div. 948, affirmed.

(Submitted September 27, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *563November 9, 1909, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term vacating the order above mentioned.

*Frank M. Avery*and *Joseph V. Mitchell*for appellant.

*EdwardB. O'Malley, Attorney- General (Amos IT. Stephens*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         314,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,676
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               522,916
<PP&E>                                         260,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,971,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,610
<BONDS>                                      1,238,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           510
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,165,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,971,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  268,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,481
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### Sylvester H. Kneeland, *Respondent, v.*Daniel F. Sullivan, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 5, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

73–319 PDF 2012

[ERRATA] 

RENEWING THE PRESIDENT’S 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET PROPOSAL 

FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION 

AND THE WORKFORCE 

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, MARCH 21, 2012 

Serial No. 112–55 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: 

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/committee.action?chamber=house&committee=education 

or 

Committee address: http://edworkforce.house.gov 
(2) 

[ERRATA] 

Please Note: 

On the cover of this publication, the lines that read: 

RENEWING THE PRESIDENT’S 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET PROPOSAL 

FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

should read as follows: 

REVIEWING THE PRESIDENT’S 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET PROPOSAL 

FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

On the title page (page 1) of this publication, the lines that read: 

RENEWING THE PRESIDENT’S 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET PROPOSAL 

FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

should read as follows: 

REVIEWING THE PRESIDENT’S 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET PROPOSAL 

FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
#### George F. Neubauer, *Appellant, v.*The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Respondent.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending January 12, 2013

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANQUE CENTRALE POPULAIRE | FBSEA          | Banque Centrale Populaire, Casablanca, Morocco, to establish a representative office in Washington, D.C. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|STELLARONE BANK           | * Branch       | StellarOne Bank, Christiansburg, Virginia, to establish a branch at 9605 Gayton Road, Richmond, Virginia | Newspaper:01/18/2013Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:                | 01/18/2013    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CR

- 13

- 1011

ROY MARTIN BARBER APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: May 14 , 2014
APPEAL FROM THE CR ITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR

- 2010

- 1532 ]
HONORABLE RANDY F. PHILHOURS, JUDGE
AFFIRMED

RHONDA K
. WOOD , Judge This is an appeal from a probation revocation. Roy Barber argues that the circuit court improperly revoked his probation when it admitted testimony at the revocation hearing that violated his confrontation rights. Because the court revoked on multiple, independent grounds, and Barber attacks only one on appeal, we affirm the revocation. Barber pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana in 2011 and was sentenced to three years’ probation. In 2013, the State filed a petition to revoke Barber’s probation based on allegations that Barber had committed two new crimes: possession of marijuana and battery in the third degree. At the hearing, Barber made a confrontation-clause objection when the State asked a police officer if the battery victim had made any statements. The circuit court overruled the objection and allowed the testimony. The2

court revoked Barber’s probation after finding that he had committed battery and possessed marijuana in violation of his probation conditions. When a circuit court expressly bases its decision on multiple, independent grounds, and an appellant challenges only one of those grounds on appeal, we affirm without addressing the merits of the argument. Morgan v. State , 2012 Ark. App. 357. Here, the circuit court revoked Barber’s proba tion on two independent grounds: possessing marijuana and committing battery in the third degree. Barber’s sole argument on appeal concerns an objection that affected only the battery charge

. The objection was irrelevant to the possession- of

-marijuana charge, and Barber does not challenge the finding that he was in possession of marijuana in violation of his probation. Because Barber failed to challenge both of the independent grounds relied on by the circuit court in revoking his probation, we affirm the revocation.
Affirmed.
W ALMSLEY and B ROWN , JJ., agree. C. Brian Williams , for appellant.
Dustin McDaniel , Att’y Gen., by: Jake H. Jones , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
EX-10.41



 Exhibit 10.41 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT 

THIS SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of November 20, 2012 in Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) by
and among: 
 Party A: E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign-owned company established and existing under the
laws of the PRC, with its address at 602-B, Building No.9, Shenzhen Software Park (II), No.1, Technology Middle Road, High-tech Middle Zone, Nanshan District, Shenzhen; 
  

			
	Party B:	  	Zhang Jing, a PRC citizen, with the ID number of 422802198106210042;
		  	  
 and

 
 Li Jin, a PRC citizen, with the ID number of 422801197310150699;


 Party C: Shenzhen Youlanguang Technology Ltd., a limited liability company established and existing
under the laws of the PRC, with its address at Suite 1-B, Polyfunctional Building (inclusive of ancillary equipment room), Shenxianling Sports Center, Zhongxincheng, Longgang District, Shenzhen; 

(Party A, Party B and Party C, each a “Party”, collectively the “Parties”) 

WHEREAS: 
 The Parties entered
into that certain exclusive purchase right agreement (Original Agreement) dated June 1, 2011 and reached certain common understandings at the time of execution of such Original Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in order to formalize in writing such common understandings of the Parties, the Parties hereby reach the following written
agreement: 
 1. At the request of Party A, Party B or any of its designees shall unconditionally transfer in full any cash and assets
received by it from Party C (including without limitation dividends, bonuses and other rights and benefits distributed by Party C) to Party A in a form consistent with PRC laws, with the relevant taxes and charges to be borne by Party A. 







 2. This agreement shall be retroactive to June 1, 2011, the execution date of the Original
Agreement. 
 3. This agreement shall constitute a supplementary agreement to the Original Agreement and shall have the same legal force and
effect as the Original Agreement. 
 4. Issues not covered hereunder shall be governed by the Original Agreement. 

5. This agreement shall be made in four copies. Party A and Party C shall each hold one copy and Party B shall hold two copies. Each copy
shall have the same legal force and effect. 
 (NO OPERATIVE TEXT BELOW) 







 (SIGNATURE PAGE TO SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT) 

Party A: E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (seal) 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Geng Jin

	
	(Authorized Representative)
	
	Party B: Zhang Jing
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zhang Jing

		
		 	Li Jin
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Li Jin



Party C: Shenzhen Youlanguang Technology Co., Ltd. (seal) 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Zou Bo
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.7 Security and Cooperation in Europe]
[Page 1095]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.7  security and cooperation in europe

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that pursuant to the 
provisions of section 169(b) of Public Law 102-138, the Speaker did 
appoint to the United States delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of 
the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Messrs. Smith of 
New Jersey, Vice Chairman, Hoyer, Torricelli, Sawyer, Coleman, Forbes, 
Cardin, and Ms. Slaughter.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**




***Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer***




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. 1350)




In
      connection with the quarterly report of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      November 14, 2007


By
              /s/
                L. S. SmithL. S. Smith,Chairman of the
                  Board,
                Chief Executive Officer andSecretary


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
      separate disclosure document.