alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Map Collections**

----

[Rights and Reproductions]

----

**Cyprus, physiography.**

United States. Central Intelligence Agency.

**CREATED/PUBLISHED** [Washington, D.C. : Central Intelligence Agency, 2010]

**NOTES**Relief shown by shading and spot heights. 

"803204AI (G00532) 7-10." 

Includes location map (inset). 

 Scale 1:1,220,000 ; Lambert conformal conic proj., standard parallels 34�45'N and 35�35'N (E 32�15'--E 34�37'/N 35�45'--N 34�27').

**SUBJECTS**Cyprus--Maps.Physical geography--Cyprus--Maps.Physical maps.Cyprus.

**MEDIUM**1 map : col. ; 17 x 21 cm.

**CALL NUMBER**G7451.C2 2010 .U5

**REPOSITORY**Library of Congress Geography and Map Division Washington, D.C. 20540-4650 USA 

**DIGITAL ID****g7451c****ct003203** http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/**g7451c**.**ct003203**

**PREVIOUS****NEXT****NEW SEARCH**
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00485

- CV

M OHAMMED “M IKE ” A LI

, D / B / A

T IMELESS J EWELERS

, F ARAH A LI

, AND

A LL O CCUPANTS OF S PACE N O

. 1176

, Appellants

V

.

P ARKS AT A RLINGTON

, LLC , Appellee §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 2022

- 006382

- 1 )

May 18, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was n o error in the county court’s order . It is ordered that the county court ’ s order is

affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant s Mohammed “ Mike ” Ali, d/b/a Timeless

Jew e lers, Fara h Ali, and All Occupants of Space No. 1176 shall bear the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000702904
<NAME> AMBANC CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          25,120
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             199
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         122,300
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           123,874
<LOANS>                                        561,656
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 735,491
<DEPOSITS>                                     605,467
<SHORT-TERM>                                    35,641
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,669
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,994
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 735,491
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,347
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,812
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    15
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,174
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,385
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,670
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,504
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      390
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,414
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,414
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.39
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,714
<LOANS-PAST>                                       530
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,313
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,428
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      418
<RECOVERIES>                                       293
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,883
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               426
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,457
        

</TABLE>
MOTION DOCKET

98-1607.

#### Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Lake App. No. 97-L-031. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal of a judgment entered by the Court of Appeals for Lake County on June 29,1998. On December 4,1998, this court entered an order extending the time for filing the record and temporarily remanding this case to the court of appeals for the purpose of entering a decision on reconsideration of its judgment.

On January 21, 1999, the clerk of the court of appeals certified and transmitted the record to this *1493court. It appearing from the record that the court of appeals entered its decision on reconsideration on December 21,1998, vacating its earlier judgment and substituting a new judgment.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the appellants show cause within twenty days of the date of this entry why this appeal from the earlier judgment entered by the court of appeals on June 29,1998, should not be dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of a Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Fire Management Plan, Saguaro National Park. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability of the Record of Decision for the Fire Management Plan, Saguaro National Park, Arizona. On April 25, 2007, the Director, Intermountain Region approved the Record of Decision for the project.  As soon as practicable, the National Park Service will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative contained in the FEIS issued on October 7, 2005. The following course of action will occur under the preferred alternative, a fire management program utilizing wildland fire use fires, prescribed fire, non-fire treatments and suppression.  This course of action and 2 alternatives were analyzed in the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements. The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate mitigating measures were identified.

The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding on impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in the decision-making process.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kristy Lund, 3693 S. Old Spanish Trail, AZ 85730,                         *KristyLund@nps.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Copies of the Record of Decision may be obtained from the contact listed above or online at                     *http://parkplanning.nps.gov.*

Dated: April 25, 2007.

Anthony J. Schetzsle,

Deputy Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.

[FR Doc. 07-3288 Filed 7-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-50-M
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97-2647.

#### Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Shafran.

On December 8, 1998, counsel for respondent filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to withdraw as counsel be, and is, hereby, granted.
# EUR-Lex - 52001XC0614(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52001XC0614(02)

**Commission notice updating the list of parties under examination pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China, and lifting the suspension of payment of the extended duty granted to certain parties **

*
Official Journal C 170 , 14/06/2001 P. 0005 - 0007 *

Commission notice updating the list of parties under examination pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China, and lifting the suspension of payment of the extended duty granted to certain parties

(2001/C 170/03)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97(1) of 20 January 1997 authorises the exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty on imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China. This duty resulted from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97(2) of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93(3), and maintained by Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000(4). Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 88/97 comprises a list of parties whose requests for authorisation for exemption from the extended duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 were under examination.

Interested parties are hereby informed of the receipt of further requests for exemption, pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97, and of requests which are still under examination at this stage. The suspension from the extended duty, following these requests, took effect as shown in Annex I to this notice, which constitutes an updated list of parties under examination.

In addition, certain parties which had requested an exemption from the extended duty subsequently withdrew their requests. The parties concerned are listed in Annex II to this notice. The suspension should be lifted in their respect as from the date of effect given in that Annex.

(1) OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55.

(3) OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39.

ANNEX I

Parties under examination

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

Parties for which the suspension is lifted

>TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

p0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145047

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145047

COA: 303431

Wayne CC: 10-011518-01-FH

ROBERT LEE SOLOMON, a/k/a

ROBERT LEE SOLOMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Richard Schurzer v. The State.

*No. 734.*

*Decided March 26.*

1. Selling Liquor to Minor—Evidence Conflicting.—On a trial for selling liquor to a minor, a conviction will not be disturbed when the evidence is conflicting, if the verdict is sufficiently supported by that in favor of the prosecution.

2. Exclusion of Evidence—Bill of Exceptions—Practice.—Unless a bill of exceptions be reserved to the exclusion of offered evidence, the ruling will not be revised.

Appeal from the County Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. T. P. Hash, County Judge.

Appellant was convicted of selling beer to a minor, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

Ho statement required.

*John*P. *G. Whitehead,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of selling beer to a ■ minor. The evidence fally supports the verdict. It is positively sworn, *277that the minor purchased the beer from appellant, and that he knew the purchaser was a minor. Appellant testified he did not sell the beer as charged. He is corroborated by another witness in a general way. The jury credited the State’s testimony, and found against appellant. There was no exception reserved to the court’s ruling excluding certain testimony set forth in the motion for new trial. As presented, this supposed error will not be revised.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
#### § 1122.10 Transcripts.

Transcripts, if any, of investigative testimony shall be recorded solely by the official reporter or other person or by means authorized by the Board or by the Investigating Officer(s). A witness who has given testimony pursuant to this part shall be entitled, upon written request, to procure a transcript of the witness' own testimony or, upon proper identification, shall have the right to inspect the official transcript of the witness' own testimony.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 5, 2013

|Filer                         | Filing Type                      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|CedarStone Financial, Inc.    | 3A1                              | CedarStone Financial, Inc., notice to become a bank holding company by acquiring CedarStone Bank, both of Lebanon, Tennessee.                                                                                                                            | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | Not applicable                  
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable                  
|CHARTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * SLHC Formation* MHC Conversion | First Charter, MHC, West Point, Georgia, to convert to stock form and merge with and into Charter Financial Corporation, West Point, Georgia, which proposes to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring Charterbank, West Point, Georgia. | Newspaper:01/14/2013Federal Register:01/19/2013        
|Newspaper:                    | 01/14/2013                      
|Federal Register:             | 01/19/2013                      

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10122

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

RICARDO JERNIGAN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TDCJ, Medical Staff 80

John Wallace Unit Administrative

Nursing Staff,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:94-CV-184-C

- - - - - - - - - -

(March 22, 1995)

Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Jernigan appeals the district court's dismissal of

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Eighth Amendment's

prohibition against "cruel and unusual punishment" protects

Jernigan from improper medical care only if the care is

"sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to

serious medical needs." Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106

(1976). Unsuccessful medical treatment, acts of negligence,

neglect, or medical malpractice are insufficient to give rise to
No. 95-10122

-2-

a cause of action under § 1983. Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d

320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Nor is a prisoner's disagreement with

his medical treatment sufficient to state a claim under § 1983. 

Id.

The district court properly characterized Jernigan's 

contentions as amounting to disagreement and dissatisfaction with

his medical treatment and not deliberate indifference to his

serious medical needs. Under the facts alleged in his complaint,

Jernigan has received continuous treatment for his injured knee

from doctors and other members of the John Wallace medical staff. 

Deficiencies in that treatment, if any, certainly do not rise to

the level of establishing deliberate indifference by prison

officials. Jernigan himself refers in his brief to the

defendants' "negligence." At its core, his claim is simply that

he has not received the medical treatment he believes he was

entitled to receive. 

Nothing in Jernigan's brief indicates that a hearing or a

questionnaire would have developed a viable claim. Thus, the

dismissal, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), on the basis of the facts

contained in Jernigan's complaint did not constitute an abuse of

discretion. Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Jernigan's motions to supplement the record with medical

records, grievance forms, sick requests, officers' statements,

letters seeking assistance from sources outside of prison, and

his original brief are DENIED. See United States v. Flores, 887

F.2d 543, 546 (5th Cir. 1989). 

AFFIRMED.
#### James Bolton, *Respondent, v.*Nathaniel B. Terpening, *Appel*lant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinions by

Boardman, J., and Learned, P. J.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.202 Non-bulk packagings for liquid hazardous materials in Packing Group II. ( a ) When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a liquid hazardous material be packaged under this section, only non-bulk packagings prescribed in this section may be used for its transportation. Each packaging must conform to the general packaging requirements of subpart B of part 173, to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter at the Packing Group I or II performance level (unless otherwise excepted), and to the particular requirements of the special provisions of column 7 of the § 172.101 table.
( b ) The following combination packagings are authorized: *Outer packagings:* Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Plywood drum: 1D Fiber drum: 1G Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Wooden barrel: 2C2 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Steel box: 4A Aluminum box: 4B Natural wood box: 4C1 or 4C2 Plywood box: 4D Reconstituted wood box: 4F Fiberboard box: 4G Expanded plastic box: 4H1 Solid plastic box: 4H2 Metal box other than steel or aluminum: 4N *Inner packagings:* Glass or earthenware receptacles Plastic receptacles Metal receptacles Glass ampoules
( c ) Except for transportation by passenger aircraft, the following single packagings are authorized:
Steel drum: 1A1 or 1A2 Aluminum drum: 1B1 or 1B2 Metal drum other than steel or aluminum: 1N1 or 1N2 Plastic drum: 1H1 or 1H2 Fiber drum: 1G (with liner) Wooden barrel: 2C1 Steel jerrican: 3A1 or 3A2 Plastic jerrican: 3H1 or 3H2 Aluminum jerrican: 3B1 or 3B2 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, fiber or plastic drum: 6HA1, 6HB1, 6HG1 or 6HH1 Plastic receptacle in steel, aluminum, wooden, plywood or fiberboard box: 6HA2, 6HB2, 6HC, 6HD2 or 6HG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum or fiber drum: 6PA1, 6PB1 or 6PG1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in steel, aluminum, wooden or fiberboard box: 6PA2, 6PB2, 6PC or 6PG2 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in solid or expanded plastic packaging: 6PH1 or 6PH2 Plastic receptacle in plywood drum: 6HD1 Glass, porcelain or stoneware in plywood drum or wickerwork hamper: 6PDl or 6PD2 Cylinders, specification, as prescribed for any compressed gas, except for Specifications 8 and 3HT
[Amdt. 173-224, 55 FR 52643, Dec. 21, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66271, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 173-241, 59 FR 67518, Dec. 29, 1994; Amdt. 173-261, 62 FR 24734, May 6, 1997; 62 FR 51560, Oct. 1, 1997; 78 FR 1089, Jan. 7, 2013]
#### § 1018.50 When a claim may be compromised.

The Board may compromise a claim not in excess of the monetary limitation if it has not been referred to GAO or DOJ for litigation. Only the Comptroller General of the United States or designee may effect the compromise of a claim that arises out of the exceptions made by the GAO in that account of an accountable officer, including a claim against the payee, prior to its referral by GAO for litigation.

[58 FR 7749, Feb. 9, 1993; 58 FR 11099, Feb. 23, 1993]
#### James Robertson, *Respondent, v.*Edward S. Bink, Appellant.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.