alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 10.39 Location of records.

Each record made available under this subpart is available for inspection and copying during regular working hours at the place where it is located, or, upon reasonable notice, at the document inspection facilities of the Office of the Secretary or each administration. Original records may be copied but may not be released from custody. Upon payment of the appropriate fee, copies are mailed to the requester.

[62 FR 23667, May 1, 1997]
Exhibit 99.2 (i)

[CHASE LOGO]
Chase Home Finance LLC
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                             CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2004-S1

Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated January 1,
2004 among Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Home Finance
LLC's (formally known as Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation), Servicer and
Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Home Finance LLC hereby provides the following
Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof,

/s/ Terry Gentry
----------------------
Terry Gentry
Senior Vice President

Certified March 30, 2005

<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 99.2 (ii)

[CHASE LOGO]
Chase Home Finance LLC
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                             CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2004-S2

Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated January 1,
2004 among Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Home Finance
LLC's (formally known as Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation), Servicer and
Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Home Finance LLC hereby provides the following
Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof,


/s/ Terry Gentry
----------------------
Terry Gentry
Senior Vice President

Certified March 30, 2005
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 4, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-106210 and333-139219 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-118891 on Form S-3 of: 1) our reportdated March 14, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Pioneer Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries, (“Pioneer”) (which report expresses anunqualified opinion), and 2) our report dated March 14, 2007, relating to management’s report onthe effectiveness on internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Pioneer for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPHouston, Texas
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 10, 2016 107245 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

NEW YORK, 

Respondent, 

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SUZETTE GUZMAN-MOORE, 

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 20, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Donnial K. Hinds, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark

of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County

(Herrick, J.), rendered August 28, 2014, convicting defendant

upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of scheme to defraud in the

first degree and identity theft in the second degree (three

counts). 

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to scheme to

defraud in the first degree and three counts of identity theft in

the second degree. Defendant also orally waived her right to

appeal and executed a written appeal waiver in open court. 

County Court sentenced defendant in accordance with the terms of

the plea agreement to consecutive prison terms of 1 to 3 years on
-2- 107245 

each charge. Defendant appeals.1

Defendant contends that the sentence imposed is harsh and

excessive. Such challenge is precluded by defendant's

unchallenged waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Mann,

140 AD3d 1532, 1533 [2016]; People v Perkins, 140 AD3d 1401, 1403

[2016]). To the extent that defendant contends that it was

illegal for County Court to impose consecutive sentences,

challenges to the legality of a sentence are not precluded by an

appeal waiver (see People v Blair, 140 AD3d 1478, 1479 [2016],

lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]). However, we find this argument to

be without merit, as "the allegations set forth in the superior

court information[], combined with the facts adduced during the

plea allocution, sufficiently establish that these crimes are

distinct and [that] the charges arose from separate acts" (People

v Woods, 141 AD3d 954, 956 [2016] [internal quotation marks and

citation omitted]). 

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court

1 Defendant's challenge to the validity of the appeal

waiver was raised for the first time in her reply brief and,

therefore, is not properly before this Court (see People v Neal,

133 AD3d 920, 921 n 2 [2015]; People v Davenport 58 AD3d 892, 894

[2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 782 [2009]). Were we to consider this

issue, we would find that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and

intelligently waived the right to appeal (see People v

Constantopoules, 141 AD3d 942, 942-943 [2016]).
#### Spofford *v.*Smith *& a.*

The filing of a demurrer with the answer on a separate paper does not differ, in legal effect, from insisting on special matter in the answer, as provided by Eule 10.

The validity of a will, duly proved and allowed in the probate court, cannot by a collateral proceeding be attacked on the ground that its execution was fraudulently proved.

Bill in Equity, by the heir of a testator, to cancel the will, alleging that the testator was fraudulently induced to execute it; that upon the petition of Smith, one of the defendants and executor of the will, the plaintiff being a minor, the probate court appointed Currier, the other defendant, his guardian *ad litem;*that Currier was the plaintiff’s trustee under the will; that Smith obtained the probate of the will in pretended solemn form, after notice by publication, Currier not attending, and no appeal being taken. The defendants answered, denying the material allegations of the bill, and demurred, assigning that the court had no jurisdiction. The answer and demurrer were filed at the same time on separate papers. Motion to dismiss the demurrer.

*Mugridge, Perkins,*and *Albín Norris,*for the plaintiff.

*Greene*and *Hawthorne,*for the defendants. •

Bingham, J.

In chancery the defendant, instead of filing a formal demurrer or plea, may insist on any special matter in his answer, and have the same benefit therefrom as if he had pleaded the same or demurred to the bill. Rule 10. The answer may be amended by inserting the demurrer in it. The probate of the will raised the issue of fraud alleged in the bill. There is no allegation of insufficiency of notice or other reason why the probate court, in *367appointing tbe guardian and allowing the will, did not have jurisdiction. A decree of the probate court upon matters within its jurisdiction cannot be impeached by a collateral proceeding. *Gordon*v. Gordon, 55 N. H. 399; *Lyme*v. Allen, 51 N. H. 242; *Railroad*v. Railroad, 57 N. H. 200; *Poplin*v. Hawke, 8 N. H. 124. When the answer is withdrawn, or amended by making the demurrer a part of it, the demurrer will be sustained.

*Case discharged.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### John L. Hubbard, *Appellant, v.*Charles R. Otis, Respondent.

Order modified as directed in opinion. Opinion by

Brady, J.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2553 

To authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the 

Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of 

participation in the testing of nuclear weapons or under other circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Mr. TIAHRT (for himself, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. GINGREY

of Georgia, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. LOEBSACK) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing 

radiation as a result of participation in the testing of 

nuclear weapons or under other circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Serv5 ice Medal Act’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2553 IH

1 SEC. 2. ATOMIC VETERANS SERVICE MEDAL. 

2 (a) SERVICE MEDAL REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 

3 Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, 

4 to be known as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Service Medal’’, to 

5 honor retired and former members of the Armed Forces 

6 who are radiation-exposed veterans (as such term is de7 fined in section 1112(c)(3) of title 38, United States 

8 Code). 

9 (b) DISTRIBUTION OF MEDAL.— 

10 (1) ISSUANCE TO RETIRED AND FORMER MEM11 BERS.—At the request of a radiation-exposed vet12 eran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atom13 ic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran. 

14 (2) ISSUANCE TO NEXT-OF-KIN.—In the case of 

15 a radiation-exposed veteran who is deceased, the 

16 Secretary may provide for issuance of the Atomic 

17 Veterans Service Medal to the next-of-kin of the per18 son. 

19 (3) APPLICATION.—The Secretary shall prepare 

20 and disseminate as appropriate an application by 

21 which radiation-exposed veterans and their next-of22 kin may apply to receive the Atomic Veterans Serv23 ice Medal. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 21, 2013

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ANDOVER BK, ANDOVER, OHIO          | 27614  | 06/03/2013 | 09/03/2013     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|CROGHAN COLONIAL BK, FREMONT, OHIO | 362717 | 06/17/2013 | 09/09/2013     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1831

For the relief of Harold David Strother, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1995

Mr. SCARBOROUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Harold David Strother, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR VACCINE-RELATED IN4 JURY.

5 (a) DETERMINATION OF INJURY.—In consideration

6 of the findings of the special master in the case entitled

7 Mary Ellen Strother, et al. v. Secretary of the Department

8 of Health and Human Services, No. 91–5030 (United

9 States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), that the

10 injury suffered by Harold David Strother, Jr. was vaccine11 related, such injury is deemed to be a vaccine-related in-
2

HR 1831 IH

1 jury under subtitle 2 of title XXI of the Public Health

2 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–10 et seq.).

3 (b) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of Health and Human

4 Services shall pay compensation to Harold David Strother,

5 Jr. for the injury referred to in subsection (a) in accord6 ance with section 2115 of the Public Health Service Act

7 (42 U.S.C. 300aa–15).

Æ
United States Steel Corporation – Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 15

Identify all NOX emission sources and factors contributing to NOX emissions at the

facility's indurating furnaces, including but not limited to, the burners.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or

were consulted in the preparation of the response: Steve Londerville (Coen)

Answer:

A report is provided that was written by Steve Londerville from Coen that addresses all of the 

questions in item 15.
#### James Mahon, Jr., *Respondent, v.*John Noon, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt,. J., not sitting.
#### § 1103.15 The practitioner's duty to clients, generally.

The practitioner shall be respectful of the law and its official ministers, and shall not be involved in corruption of public officials or deception of the public. In giving improper service or advice, the practitioner invites and deserves stern condemnation. The practitioner shall observe and advise all clients to observe the statutory law to the best of his knowledge or as interpreted by competent adjudication. The practitioner owes a general duty to practice candor toward his client with respect to all aspects to his service to the client.
§ 92.07-90 Vessels contracted for prior to July 1, 1968. ( a ) For all vessels of 4,000 gross tons and over contracted for prior to January 1, 1962, existing structure arrangements and materials previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standard as the original construction. Major alterations and conversions shall be in compliance with the provisions of this subpart to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) For industrial vessels of 300 gross tons and over but less than 4,000 gross tons, contracted for prior to July 1, 1968, which carry in excess of 12 industrial personnel, existing structure arrangements and materials previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standard as the original construction. Major alterations and conversions shall be in compliance with this subpart to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
[CGFR 67-90, 33 FR 1016, Jan. 26, 1968]
#### § 541.5 Failure to include required information.

Failure to include any of the required minimum information in this part in a demurrage or detention invoice eliminates any obligation of the billed party to pay the applicable charge.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.36 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1022]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.36  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to Mr. UNDERWOOD, 
for today and the balance of the week.
  And then,
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 25, 2009

|Filer                                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS GUARANTY FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC           | Interagency Notice of Change in Bank Control submitted by the John M. St. Clair, Jr. Trust, Irvine, KY (Kathy Dale Samples, Trustee) of its intent to retain control of 100% of the outstanding voting shares of Citizens Guaranty Financial Corporation, Irvine, KY which controls Citizens Guaranty Bank, Richmond, KY. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/14/2009
|Newspaper:                              | Not available
|Federal Register:                       | 05/14/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CITIZENS BKG CO, SANDUSKY, OHIO   | 542528 | 10/20/2008 | 04/03/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|NORTH SIDE B&TC, CINCINNATI, OHIO | 615217 | 12/08/2008 | 04/13/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 31, 2012

----

Testimony and Statements            The European Economic and Financial Situation -- statement by Steven B. Kamin, director, Division of International Finance, before a subcommittee of the House Committee on Financial Services on the economic situation in Europe and the Federal Reserve's response.            -Published, March 27, 2012                        Mobile Payments -- statement by Sandra F. Braunstein, director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on consumer use of mobile financial services.            -Published, March 29, 2012            Personnel            Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation -- appointment of Michael Hsu as assistant director.            -Announced, March 28, 2012            Regulations and Policies            Federal Assistance to Swaps Entities -- interagency guidance to clarify that the effective date of section 716, the so-called Swaps Pushout provision, of the Dodd-Frank Act is July 16, 2013.            -Approved, March 28, 2012            Enforcement            Cadence Financial Corporation, Starkville, Mississippi -- written agreement dated November 17, 2010, terminated on March 20, 2012.            -Announced, March 27, 2012                        Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, and Orrstown Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.            -Announced, March 27, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received: