alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections
1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

|1. |  | Patrick J. Mitchell is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
               Ascent Assurance, Inc. (the Company).
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Cynthia B. Koenig is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
               the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | To the best of our knowledge:
|-- |  | -----------------------------

| | (A) | The Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
               accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
               Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
               (the Exchange Act); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 9, 2003

| | /s/ Patrick J. Mitchell
Patrick J. Mitchell
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
| | /s/ Cynthia B. Koenig
Cynthia B. Koenig
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer    
|
§ 1515.3 Terms used in this part. The terms used in 49 CFR parts 1500, 1540, 1570, and 1572 also apply in this part. In addition, the following terms are used in this part: *Administrative law judge* means an administrative law judge appointed pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 3105.
*Applicant* means an individual who has applied for one of the security threat assessments identified in 49 CFR 1515.1. This includes an individual who previously applied for and was found to meet the standards for the security threat assessment but TSA later determined that the individual poses a security threat.
*Date of service* means— ( 1 ) In the case of personal service, the date of personal delivery to the residential address listed on the application;
( 2 ) In the case of mailing with a certificate of service, the date shown on the certificate of service;
( 3 ) In the case of mailing and there is no certificate of service, 10 days from the date mailed to the address designated on the application as the mailing address;
( 4 ) In the case of mailing with no certificate of service or postmark, the date mailed to the address designated on the application as the mailing address shown by other evidence; or
( 5 ) The date on which an electronic transmission occurs.
*Final Agency Order* means an order issued by the TSA Final Decision Maker.
*Decision denying a review of a waiver* means a document issued by an administrative law judge denying a waiver requested under 49 CFR 1515.7.
*Mail* includes U.S. mail, or use of an express courier service.
*Party* means the applicant or the agency attorney.
*Personal delivery* includes hand-delivery or use of a contract or express messenger service, but does not include the use of Government interoffice mail service.
*Properly addressed* means a document that shows an address contained in agency records, a residential, business, or other address submitted by a person on any document provided under this subpart, or any other address shown by other reasonable and available means.
*Substantial Evidence* means such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.
*Security threat assessment* means the threat assessment for which the applicant has applied, as described in 49 CFR 1515.1.
*TSA Final Decision Maker* means the Administrator, acting in the capacity of the decision maker on appeal, or any person to whom the Administrator has delegated the Administrator's decision-making authority. As used in this subpart, the *TSA Final Decision Maker* is the official authorized to issue a final decision and order of the Administrator.
[72 FR 3588, Jan. 25, 2007, as amended at 89 FR 35626, May 1, 2024]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-77816) pertaining to the Employees' incentive stock options and other
stock option and warrant agreements of Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. of our report
dated August 5, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended June 30, 1997.

Los Angeles, California
October 8, 1997
#### Charles H. Coffin and another, Respondents, v. Samuel Baer and another, Appellants.

*628Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs on giving stipulation not to sue for false imprisonment.
SUPREME COURT.

#### The Broadway Bank agt. Edward Luff *et al.*

*Special*Term,

October, *1875.*

*Dm/wtre/r to answer of statute of limitations.*

Where a defendant jointly indebted upon a contract is summoned, under section 375 of the Code, to show cause why he should not be bound by the judgment entered in the action, the same as if he had been originally summoned, he cannot answer that the cause of action did not accrue within six years before the issuing and service of the summons to him to show cause.

The action was commenced as to him when the summons and complaint were originally served on his co-defendant.

Van Vorst, J.

The defendants are jointly indebted upon contract. The defendant now summoned, under section 375 of the Code, to show cause why he should not be bound by the judgment entered in the action in the same manner as if he had been originally summoned, answers that the cause of action stated in the complaint, on which judgment was obtained, did not accrue within six years before the issuing and service of the summons to the defendant to show cause.

Section 379 provides what the defendant summoned may set up by way of answer. He may deny the judgment, or set up any defense thereto which may have arisen subsequently thereto. In addition, he may make any defense which he might have made to the action if the summons had been served on him at the time when the same was originally commenced, and such defense had been then interposed to such action.

The defendant does not deny the judgment.

*480The answer, that the cause of action stated in the complaint, on which judgment was obtained, did not accrue within six years before the issuing and service of the summons to show cause, is not a defense to the judgment. It is addressed to the cause of action upon which the judgment is founded. If the judgment had been paid, that would be a defense arising subsequently to its recovery.

If, when the action was originally commenced, six years had elapsed since the cause of action had accrued, that would be a defense which might have been originally intended. It is conceded, however, that the action was originally brought within the six years. Besides, the action was commenced as to this defendant when the summons and complaint were originally served on his co-defendant, who is a joint contractor with him *(Code, sec.*99).

There should be judgment for the plaintiff on the demurrer.
§ 1300.2 Disclosure requirement for existing rates. ( a ) A rail carrier must disclose to any person, upon formal request, the specific rate(s) requested (or the basis for calculating the specific rate(s)), as well as all charges and service terms that may be applicable to transportation covered by the rate(s). For purposes of § 1300.4(a)(1) of this part, a formal request under this part is one that clearly notifies the railroad that the requester seeks not only immediate information but also notification of any future increases in the rate(s) involved or changes in pertinent service terms.
( b ) The information provided by a rail carrier under this section must be provided immediately. (It is expected that the response will be sent within hours, or at least by the next business day, in most situations.) Such information may be provided either in written or electronic form as agreed to by the parties. If the parties cannot agree, such information is to be provided in electronic (non-passive) form where both parties have the requisite capabilities; otherwise, it is to be provided in writing.
( c ) A rail carrier may, at its option, require that all requests submitted under this section be in written or electronic form, although the carrier may permit oral requests.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Stephen L. Day
    
    
    
    /s/ Michael W. BrunsStephen L. Day
    
    
    
    Michael W. BrunsPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Date: August 13, 2008
    
    
    
    Date: August 13, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, John Venette, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Implant Technologies,
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



(Date)                             February 13, 2007


BY(Signature)                      /s/ John Venette
(Name and Title)                   John Venette
                                   Treasurer, Secretary and Chief
                                   Financial Officer



                                       12
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending November 10, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
### From: Rahul Pendse [rpendse@trinityconsultants.com]

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:31 PM

To: Fortin, Kelly

Cc: Land, Eva; Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com;

Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com; Dougie.Robertson@deepwater.com
Subject: Anadarko DEWT Slide

Attachments: DRAFT EGOM Discoverer Spirit PSD Title V Permit Application Meeting

02

- 07

- 13 V4.pdf

Kelly,

On behalf of Anadarko team, I would like to thank you and other EPA team members for the opportunity to meet and discuss the permit application and questions rel ated to currently active permit. Per our discussion, please find DEWT system related slide attached herewith. Red colored strike

- though items represent the parameters DEWT is not set up to monitor. Also, we would like to propose a phone call to

discuss con tents of DEWT system technical memorandum to provide rationale for Anadarko's request. Please advise whether you will be available for a phone call in the next week. Thanks again and we will keep you posted with the status of other action items we are curr ently working on. Have a good week.

Best Regards,

Rahul Pendse

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------

Rahul Pendse │ Managing Consultant │ rpendse@trinityconsul tants.com Trinity Consultants │ 301 Main Street, Suite 900 │ Baton Rouge, LA 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 │ Fax: 225

- 346

- 4032 │ Cell: (714) 454

- 0518

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is inte nded only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entiti es other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
EX-4.52



 Exhibit 4.52 
  

 

			
	From:	  	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
		  	(Registration No. 1950/038232/06)
		  	Block 27
		  	Randfontein Office Park
		  	Cnr Main Reef Road & Ward Avenue
		  	Randfontein
		  	(the “Lender”)
		
	To:	  	Histopath Proprietary Limited
		  	(Registration No. 2012/082229/07)
		  	638 Jacqueline Drive
		  	Garsfontein
		  	0081
		  	(the “Borrower” and together with the Lender, the “Parties”)

 10 May 2013 
 Dear
Sirs 
 Term loan facility agreement entered into between the Borrower (as borrower) and the Lender (as lender) on or about 20 March 2013 in
terms of which the Lender agreed to advance a loan to the Borrower, all on the terms and conditions contained therein (the “Facility Agreement”) 
  

	1.	Reference is made to the Facility Agreement. Save as defined herein, terms defined in the Facility Agreement (whether directly or by way of incorporation by reference) shall bear the meanings ascribed thereto therein
when used in this letter (this “Extension Letter”). 

  

	2.	The Lender hereby agrees that the date referred to in clause 3.4 of the Facility Agreement is extended to 14 June 2013 (or such later date as may be agreed by the Lender). 


 

	3.	Save as expressly contemplated in this Extension Letter, the Facility Agreement shall remain unamended and, subject to its terms, of full force and effect. 


 

	4.	This Extension Letter comprises a written amendment to the Facility Agreement within the contemplation of clause 28.5.1 thereof and constitutes the whole agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter
hereof. 

  

	5.	This Extension Letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. 








 As witnessed by the duly authorised representatives of the parties hereto 

 

	
	Signed for and on behalf of:
	
	 /s/

	
	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
	
	Name:
	
	Title:
	
	Date:
	
	Witness:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 8, 2013

----

Regulations and Policies            Regulation KK (Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities) -- interim final rule with request for comment on the treatment of uninsured U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks under the "swaps pushout provision" of the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, June 4, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
98-1927.

#### Madera v. Satellite Shelters, Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73172.

Cook, J., dissents.
§ 11.109 IRB review of research. ( a ) An IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research activities covered by this policy, including exempt research activities under § 11.104 for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption (under § 11.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7), and (8)).
( b ) An IRB shall require that information given to subjects (or legally authorized representatives, when appropriate) as part of informed consent is in accordance with § 11.116. The IRB may require that information, in addition to that specifically mentioned in § 11.116, be given to the subjects when in the IRB's judgment the information would meaningfully add to the protection of the rights and welfare of subjects.
( c ) An IRB shall require documentation of informed consent or may waive documentation in accordance with § 11.117.
( d ) An IRB shall notify investigators and the institution in writing of its decision to approve or disapprove the proposed research activity, or of modifications required to secure IRB approval of the research activity. If the IRB decides to disapprove a research activity, it shall include in its written notification a statement of the reasons for its decision and give the investigator an opportunity to respond in person or in writing.
( e ) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research requiring review by the convened IRB at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, not less than once per year, except as described in § 11.109(f).
( f ) ( 1 ) Unless an IRB determines otherwise, continuing review of research is not required in the following circumstances: ( i ) Research eligible for expedited review in accordance with § 11.110;
( ii ) Research reviewed by the IRB in accordance with the limited IRB review described in § 11.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), or (d)(7) or (8);
( iii ) Research that has progressed to the point that it involves only one or both of the following, which are part of the IRB-approved study: ( A ) Data analysis, including analysis of identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, or
( B ) Accessing follow-up clinical data from procedures that subjects would undergo as part of clinical care.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( g ) An IRB shall have authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process and the research.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
EX-10.27



 Exhibit 10.27 
 SPOUSAL CONSENT 
 I, Hu Xiao Mei, am the lawful spouse of Yuqiang Deng. I hereby consent
unconditionally that a certain percentage of the equity interest in Guangzhou Jiubang Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Sanju Advertising Media Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Zhiteng Computer Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Hengye Software Technology
Co., Ltd. that is held by and registered in the name of my spouse will be disposed pursuant to the arrangements under the Business Cooperation Agreement, the Proxy Agreement and Power of Attorney, the Exclusive Option Agreement and the Equity Pledge
Agreement, which were executed by my spouse on August 21, 2013, as well as the arrangements under the Loan Agreements executed by my spouse on June 26, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively. 

I further undertake not to take any action with the intent to interfere with the above arrangements, including making any claim that such equity interest
constitutes property or community property between myself and my spouse. I hereby waive unconditionally and irrevocably any rights or entitlements whatsoever to such equity interest that may be granted to me according to any applicable laws.

  

	
	/s/ Hu Xiao Mei
	
	Date: August 21, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
BSB Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 339-2138) of our report dated January
21, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of BSB Bancorp,
Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended December 31,
1999, 1998, 1997, which report is included in the Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated by reference on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
Syracuse, N.Y.
March 29, 2000

                                                                              90