alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1542.107 Changed conditions affecting security. ( a ) After approval of the security program, each airport operator must notify TSA when changes have occurred to the— ( 1 ) Measures, training, area descriptions, or staffing, described in the security program;
( 2 ) Operations of an aircraft operator or foreign air carrier that would require modifications to the security program as required under § 1542.103; or
( 3 ) Layout or physical structure of any area under the control of the airport operator, airport tenant, aircraft operator, or foreign air carrier used to support the screening process, access, presence, or movement control functions required under part 1542, 1544, or 1546 of this chapter.
( b ) Each airport operator must notify TSA no more than 6 hours after the discovery of any changed condition described in paragraph (a) of this section, or within the time specified in its security program, of the discovery of any changed condition described in paragraph (a) of this section. The airport operator must inform TSA of each interim measure being taken to maintain adequate security until an appropriate amendment to the security program is approved. Each interim measure must be acceptable to TSA.
( c ) For changed conditions expected to be less than 60 days duration, each airport operator must forward the information required in paragraph (b) of this section in writing to TSA within 72 hours of the original notification of the change condition(s). TSA will notify the airport operator of the disposition of the notification in writing. If approved by TSA, this written notification becomes a part of the airport security program for the duration of the changed condition(s).
( d ) For changed conditions expected to be 60 days or more duration, each airport operator must forward the information required in paragraph (b) of this section in the form of a proposed amendment to the airport operator's security program, as required under § 1542.105. The request for an amendment must be made within 30 days of the discovery of the changed condition(s). TSA will respond to the request in accordance with § 1542.105.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending April 20, 2013

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|CAPGEN CAPITAL GROUP III LLC | * 3A3         | CapGen Capital Group III LLC and CapGen Capital Group III LP, both located in New York, New York, to increase their investment up to 25% of the voting securities of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, Stuart, Florida, and thereby indirectly control Seacoast National Bank, Stuart, Florida. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

96-1421.

#### State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialist Co.

Franklin App. No. 95APD05-607. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 255, 703 N.E.2d 306. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resniok and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
#### The People of the State of New York, *Appellant, v.*The Long Island Railroad Company and another, *Respondents.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Court of Appeals in *People*v. *B., F. B. and C. Island R. R. Co.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 134 (Friday, July 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 38617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Fire Management Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
Saguaro National Park, AZ

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a Record of Decision on the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Fire Management Plan, Saguaro 
National Park.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 
4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability of the 
Record of Decision for the Fire Management Plan, Saguaro National Park, 
Arizona. On April 25, 2007, the Director, Intermountain Region approved 
the Record of Decision for the project. As soon as practicable, the 
National Park Service will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative 
contained in the FEIS issued on October 7, 2005. The following course 
of action will occur under the preferred alternative, a fire management 
program utilizing wildland fire use fires, prescribed fire, non-fire 
treatments and suppression. This course of action and 2 alternatives 
were analyzed in the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements. 
The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, 
and appropriate mitigating measures were identified.
    The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, 
synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, 
a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding 
on impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to 
minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in 
the decision-making process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristy Lund, 3693 S. Old Spanish 
Trail, AZ 85730, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aee5dcc7dddad7e2dbc0caeec0dedd80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2269504b51565b6e574c46624c52510c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the Record of Decision may be 
obtained from the contact listed above or online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov.

    Dated: April 25, 2007.
Anthony J. Schetzsle,
Deputy Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 07-3288 Filed 7-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.0


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.  33-16739) of Oregon Steel Mills,  Inc. of our report
dated February 27, 1998 appearing on page 22 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial
Statement Schedule, which appears on page 44 of this Form 10-K.




/s/PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 25, 1998
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

     Information relating to certain of the subsidiaries of Peoples Heritage
Financial Group, Inc. is set forth below:

     Direct Subsidiaries:

                    Name                       Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                    ----                       -----------------------------
  Peoples Heritage Bank                                   Maine
  First Coastal Banks, Inc.                               New Hampshire
  
  Indirect Subsidiaries:
  
                    Name                       Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                    ----                       -----------------------------
  The First National Bank of Portsmouth(1)                United States
  Heritage Investment Planning Group, Inc. (2)            Maine
  Peoples Heritage Leasing Corp. (2)                      Maine
  Peoples Heritage Mortgage Corporation(2)                Maine






--------------------------
  (1)  Subsidiary of First Coastal Banks, Inc.
  (2)  Subsidiary of Peoples Heritage Bank.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending February 18, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY, THE | * Branch       | The Adirondack Trust Company, Saratoga Springs, New York, to establish a full service branch in the Town of Malta at 320-322 Ruhle Road South, Ballston Lake, Saratoga County, New York.                                  | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | Not available 
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|DANSKE BANK A/S               | FBSEA          | Danske Bank A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, to establish a branch in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24 of Regulation K.                                                                                            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | Not available 
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|DANSKE BANK A/S               | 4c8            | Danske Bank A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, to engage in certain nonbanking activities through Danske Markets Inc., New York, New York, pursuant to Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act and Section 225.28(b)(7)(i) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | Not applicable
|Federal Register:             | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
MOTION DOCKET

92-2565.

#### State v. Scudder.

Franklin App. No. 91AP-506. On motion to set execution date. Motion denied.

Cook, J., would defer ruling on the motion at this time.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.29 Indian Education Technical Amendment]
[Page 380]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.29  indian education technical amendment

  On motion of Mr. GOODLING, by unanimous consent, the bill of the 
Senate (S. 377) to amend a provision of part A of title IX of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; was taken from the 
Speaker's table.
  When said bill was considered, read twice, ordered to be read a third 
time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said bill was passed was, by 
unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
§ 1241.2 Reporting companies defined. ( a ) Every common carrier by rail which is required by the act to regulate commerce to file with the Board any tariff or schedule of rates, fares, or charges, or any concurrence in such tariff or schedule, shall be required to keep operating accounts and to file an annual operating report unless specifically excused by the Board.
( b ) Every railway corporation owning but not operating a railway used in interstate or foreign commerce shall be required to file with the Board an annual nonoperating report unless relieved therefrom under the provisions of rule following.
( c ) Any actually existing inactive corporation coming within the scope of rule given above may be relieved from the requirements of that rule if it has no outstanding stocks or obligations not held by or for its controlling corporation and the controlling corporation reports for the inactive corporation such facts as the Board may require to be reported.
( d ) Reports of a controlling corporation and its controlled corporations must exclude duplications in respect of investments in railway plant and equipment and in respect of securities outstanding.
[32 FR 20456, Dec. 20, 1967, as amended at 46 FR 9115, Jan. 28, 1981]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending October 6, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1016.303 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the agency against which an award is sought may file an answer to the application. Unless agency counsel requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If agency counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted as justified.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of agency counsel's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, agency counsel shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 1016.307.
[46 FR 61660, Dec. 18, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 26380, June 23, 1989]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1842

To ban the utilization of Federal funds by a State to lure jobs and businesses

from another State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1995

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself and Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight

A BILL

To ban the utilization of Federal funds by a State to lure

jobs and businesses from another State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BAN ON UTILIZATION OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO

4 LURE JOBS AND BUSINESSES FROM AN5 OTHER STATE.

6 No State may engage in the direct or indirect utiliza7 tion of Federal funds of any kind, in whole or in part,

8 to lure jobs and businesses from another State.

Æ
<PAGE> 1

                                                                    Exhibit 23
                                                                    ----------




                            Independent Auditors' Consent
                            -----------------------------


The Board of Directors
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-39140, No. 33-65722, No. 33-82864, No. 33-92106, No. 33-95930, No. 33-97590,
and No. 333-4499 on Form S-8 of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. (Roosevelt) of
our report dated January 20, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Roosevelt.

Our report states that the supplemental fair value consolidated balance sheets
of Roosevelt have been prepared by management to present relevant financial
information that is not provided by the historical cost consolidated balance
sheets and is not intended to be a presentation in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. The supplemental fair value consolidated
balance sheets do not purport to present the net realizable, liquidation,
or market value of Roosevelt as a whole. Furthermore, amounts ultimately
realized by Roosevelt from the disposal of assets may vary significantly
from the fair values presented.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
March 3, 1997
98-1881.

#### Timmis v. Tracy.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 96-R-303. On motion for admission *pro hac vice*of George M. Malis and Erich J. D’Andrea. Motion granted.
#### Henry H. Lyman, *Appellant, v.*John W. P. Allen and others, *Respondents.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barker, J.
§ 1570.105 Responsibility for Determinations. ( a ) *Higher-risk operations.* While TSA has determined the criteria for applicability of the requirements in subpart B to 49 CFR parts 1580, 1582, and 1584 based on risk-assessments for freight railroad, public transportation system, passenger railroad, or over-the-road (OTRB) owner/operators are required to determine if the applicability criteria identified in subpart B to parts 1580, 1582, and 1584 apply to their operations. Owner/operators are required to notify TSA of applicability within 30 days of June 22, 2020.
( b ) *New or modified operations.* If an owner/operator commences new operations or modifies existing operations after June 22, 2020, that person is responsible for determining whether the new or modified operations would meet the applicability criteria in subpart B to 49 CFR part 1580, 1582, or 1584 and must notify TSA no later than 90 calendar days before commencing operations or implementing modifications.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         346,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,072
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 854,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,834
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     851,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   854,420
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,501
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (42,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 173.204 Non-bulk, non-specification packagings for certain hazardous materials.

When § 172.101 of this subchapter specifies that a liquid or solid hazardous material be packaged under this section, any appropriate non-bulk packaging which conforms to the general packaging requirements of subpart B of part 173 may be used for its transportation. Packagings need not conform to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter.