alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BY HAND 

Document Control Office 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

Room 6428 

U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

P.O. Box 331, Miiiwood, VA 22646 (540) 837-1602 

December 17, 2009 

Re: Testing Consent Order for Ethylene Dichloride; 

Interim Report (Docket No. OPPT-2003-0010) 

Dear Sirs : 

, 

C`~ 

C3 

Enclosed in sextuplicate is the six-month interim report required under the Enforceable 

Consent Agreement for Ethylene Dichloride, 68 Fed. Reg. 33125 (June 3, 2003) (the "ECA"), 

describing the status of testing conducted or to be conducted under the ECA. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if there is any question about this status report . 

Sincerely, 

Enclosures 

cc: John E. Schaeffer 

W. Caffey Norman, Esq. 

5063006 

M--' 04~ lwttj 

Peter E. Voytek, Ph.D. 

Manager 

~IfIIIVhNIIYIIVV~hlllll,~H~Mllill,~8n$ ql 

CONTAINS NO CBI 

-3a 33 L' Y 
0 0 N 

m 

a 

E 

m 

u 

m 

c 

w 

c 

E n 

E y U :. 

T O! 

C _7 C C 

c ~ U m ?? o 

y .i 

.Z, 

w h g .c Lo W ~ m ~ N 

tx'o 

M 

Rt $ 0~0 c 

n ~ v 

C O OO O ~ O y ' ( 1~0 O 7 

V .

.0. 5 

~ 

C N ~ `p N _p ~y ~ C `p ~ 

N 

O ~ c C u a ° > O 0 ~ ~ 

c F ~ o ° o .o O W C, '8 

C 

C4 x a_+ a_ _ y "~ V O 

tj F- 'a :3 

~ N e 

c ~ V ~ C (/) o > 

U i+ ma 5r'~ i° a Q oo 

~.o 

W ~A E c ~o. ~ 

0 

° 

M 

~ E ~ 23 ~ j o > 

O G ~m ~¢`~e o$~a~' o~' w 

L ~ m U W ~ M Y O W `m N ?,` C 

Z 

0 

C ~ ~(p N 'j N a ~ K 

~~ ~ ~ C O 

V ~ Y `~mf G) y ~ LL a w D ~ 

"N 

Q t O S '- O 'C O L 

w N U N G7 .V- O 7 m 

0 

7 N = d ~ C 

. C ~ ° 3U=2 a F u~+ cv

::~ y 

0 

C _o 

a w f- a 

A U 

w 

c ° 0 '~ r) 

o F ` Lo N ~. # 

'x cel p o 

0 fCL ow
#### The Lehigh and Hudson River Railway Company, Appellant, *v.*Central Trust Company of New York, Respondent.

*Lehigh & Hudson River Ry. Co.*v. *Central Trust Co.,*133 App. Div. 304, affirmed.

(Argued October 25, 1910;

decided November 15, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 15, 1909, reversing in part a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial in an action to compel the defendant as trustee under the general mortgage of the plaintiff corporation to deliver to it certain shares of stock *600and certain bonds. The judgment was reversed only in so far as it directed delivery of the bonds.

*John G. Milburn*and *John J. Beattie*for appellant.

*Arthur II. Van Brunt*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.., Gray, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
AFS-12-511-E October 12, 2012

Exemption No. 8841C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26745

Mr. David L. Jones Corporate Aviation Education Director

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Dear Mr. Jones:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8841, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 22, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Technical Educational Services, Inc., d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance (Aviation Institute) (operating under Air Agency Certificate U6ET095K) for an extension of Exemption No. 8841, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Aviation Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register . The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8841, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8841, as amended, to February 28, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8841 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8841.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 11, 2014

----

Board Operations            Board Budget and Compensation -- operating and capital budgets for 2014 and related compensation actions.            -Approved, December 20, 2013            (A/C)                      Office of Inspector General -- 2014 operating and capital budgets.            -Approved, December 2, 2013            (A/C)          Forms            Forms -- final Board review to extend with revision the Interchange Transaction Fees Surveys:  Debit card issuer survey (FR 3064a) and Payment card network survey (FR 3064b).            -Approved, January 7, 2014                        Forms -- final Board review to extend with revision the Domestic Finance Company Report of Consolidated Assets and Liabilities (FR 2248).            -Approved, January 8, 2014            Monetary and Financial Policy            Term Deposit Facility -- fixed-rate offering of 28-day term deposits with full allotment of tenders on January 13, 2014.            -Announced, January 8, 2014            Regulations and Policies            Regulation HH (Designated Financial Market Utilities) -- publication for comment of (1) proposed amendments to the risk-management standards for certain systemically important financial market utilities, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, and (2) proposed revisions to part I of the Federal Reserve Policy on Payment System Risk.            -Approved, January 8, 2014            Reserve Bank Operations            Federal Reserve Bank Budgets -- operating and capital budgets for the Federal Reserve Banks, Federal Reserve Information Technology, and Office of Employee Benefits for 2014.            -Approved, December 11, 2013            (A/C)          Enforcement            Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Catoosa, Oklahoma, and Bank of Commerce, Chelsea -- written agreement dated October 26, 2009, terminated December 20, 2013.            -Announced, January 7, 2014                        Cornerstone Holding Company, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota -- written agreement dated May 27, 2011, terminated December 19, 2013.            -Announced, January 7, 2014                        Tioga State Bank, Spencer, New York -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.            -Announced, January 9, 2014                        TransPecos Banks, Pecos, Texas -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.            -Announced, January 9, 2014            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
EX-4.43



 Exhibit 4.43 
  

			
	From:	  	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
		  	(Registration No. 1950/038232/06)
		  	Block 27
		  	Randfontein Office Park
		  	Cnr Main Reef Road & Ward Avenue
		  	Randfontein
		  	(the “Lender”)
		
	To:	  	Business Venture Investments No. 1687 Proprietary Limited
		  	(Registration No. 2012/030646/07)
		  	Block A, Boston House
		  	3A De-La-Rey Road
		  	Rivonia
		  	2128
		  	(the “Borrower” and together with the Lender, the “Parties”)

 24 June 2013 

Dear Sirs 
 Term loan facility agreement entered into between
the Borrower (as borrower) and the Lender (as lender) on or about 20 March 2013 in terms of which the Lender agreed to advance a loan to the Borrower, all on the terms and conditions contained therein (the “Facility Agreement”)

  

	1.	Reference is made to the Facility Agreement. Save as defined herein, terms defined in the Facility Agreement (whether directly or by way of incorporation by reference) shall bear the meanings ascribed thereto therein
when used in this letter (this “Waiver Letter”). 

  

	2.	The Lender hereby waives: 

  

	 	2.1.	the Condition Precedent that the Lender receives an original of each Finance Document duly entered into by each Party and an original of each Transaction Document duly entered into by each Party to it contemplated in
Clause 2 of Schedule 1 of the Facility Agreement, on the basis that copies of such executed Finance Documents and Transaction Documents have been received by the Lender; and 


 

	 	2.2.	the fulfilment of the Condition Precedent contemplated in Clause 4.1 of Schedule 1 of the Facility Agreement, namely that the Lender has received evidence that the fees, costs and expenses then due from the Borrower
pursuant to Clause 10. (Fees) have been paid or will be paid by the Closing Date. 

  

	3.	Save as expressly contemplated in this Waiver Letter, the Facility Agreement shall remain unamended and, subject to its terms, of full force and effect. 









	4.	This Waiver Letter comprises a written amendment to the Facility Agreement within the contemplation of clause 28.5.1 thereof and constitutes the whole agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter
hereof. 

  

	5.	This Waiver Letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. 








 As witnessed by the duly authorised representatives of the parties hereto 

 

	
	Signed for and on behalf of:
	
	 /s/

	
	Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
	
	Name: Frank Abbott
	Title: Director
	Date: 24 June 2013
	Witness: /s/
98-2084.

#### State ex rel. Strothers v. Cleveland Parking Violations Bur.

*In*Mandamus. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1426, 702 N.E.2d 902. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

RAW DATA QUALIFIER REPORT

Report Request ID: 1366985 Report Code: AMP360 Sep. 4, 2015

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: JWV

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region

06

06

06

06

06

06

06

06

077

099

047

039

019

031

107

029

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

CRITERIA 88101

AGENCY SELECTIONS

California Air Resources Board

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 

Control District

SELECTED OPTIONS

QUALIFIER COUNTS BY MONITOR

MERGE PDF FILES

QUALIFIER CODE

CONCURRENCE STATUS

QUALIFIER TYPES

AGENCY ROLE

Option Type Option Value

YES

YES

RJ - High Winds (REQEXC)

All Data (Concurred and Non-concurred)

ALL QUALFIER TYPES

PQAO

DATE CRITERIA

2010

Start Date End Date

01 01 12 31 2014

Tribal

Code
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Air Quality System

Raw Data Qualifier Report (v 1.1) Report Date: Sep. 4, 2015

Page 1 of 2

Parameter: PM2.5 - Local Conditions 88101

Standard Units: Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) 105

06-029-0014-88101-1

06-029-0014-88101-1

06-029-0016-88101-1

06-029-0016-88101-1

Monitor Key /

Monitor Key /

5558 CALIFORNIA AVE, 

BAKERSFIELD

5558 CALIFORNIA AVE, 

BAKERSFIELD

410 E. PLANZ RD. 

BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307

410 E. PLANZ RD. 

BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307

Site Address

Site Address

2014-06-10 00:00

2014-06-11 00:00

2010-04-11 00:00

2013-05-05 00:00

Sample Date-Time

Sample Date-Time

79.9

74

107.8

167.3

Sample

Value

Sample

Value

RJ

RJ

RJ

RJ

Code

Code

High Winds

High Winds

High Winds

High Winds

Description

Description

High winds.

High winds.

High winds caused blowing 

dust and elevated PM 

concentrations.

Event:

Event:

Event:

2015-06-29

2015-06-29

2014-06-19

Action

Date

Action

Date

High winds.

High winds.

High winds caused blowing dust and 

elevated PM concentrations.

Comment/URL:

Comment/URL:

Comment/URL:

NAAQS Standard

NAAQS Standard

Ind

Ind

Date

Date

Qualifier

Qualifier

2015-06-29

2015-06-29

2011-06-13

2014-06-19

Monitor Qualifier Counts:

Monitor Qualifier Counts:

Concurrence

Concurrence

(

(

)

)

RJ

RJ

High Winds

High Winds

Count:

Count:

2

2
United Stated Environmental Protection Agency

Air Quality System

Report Date: Sep. 4, 2015

Page 2 of 2

All Qualifiers Utilized:

Qualifier

Code: Qualifier Description:

Qualifier

Count:

RJ High Winds 4
<PAGE>




Exhibit 11

Computation of earnings per share year 2001.


                                     NO. OF SHARES        WEIGHT
                                     -------------        ------

   12/31/01 Common stock                5,916,527
                                   ---------------
                                        5,916,527            25%    1,479,132

   09/30/01 Common stock
                                        5,916,527
                                   ---------------
                                        5,916,527            25%    1,479,132
                                                                -------------
   06/30/01 Common stock
                                        5,916,527
                                   ---------------
                                        5,916,527            25%    1,479,132
                                                                -------------
   03/31/01 Common stock
                                        5,916,527
                                   ---------------
                                        5,916,527            25%    1,479,132
                                                                -------------


                WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES                   5,916,527


Earnings per Common share:
                 Net Income            $2,882,148                     $   .49







<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11

Computation of earnings per year 2000.


                                        NO. OF SHARES     WEIGHT
                                        -------------     ------

   12/31/00 Common stock                    5,916,527
                                   ------------------
                                            5,916,527       25%      1,479,132

   09/30/00 Common stock
                                            5,916,527
                                   ------------------
                                            5,516,527       25%      1,479,132
                                                               ---------------
   06/30/00 Common stock
                                            5,916,527
                                   ------------------
                                            5,916,527       25%      1,479,132
                                                               ---------------
   03/31/00 Common stock
                                            5,916,527
                                   ------------------
                                            5,916,527       25%      1,479,132
                                                               ---------------


            WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES                        5,916,527

Earnings per Common share:
                 Net Income                  $570,663                  $   .10
# EUR-Lex - 52014DC0300 - EN

*|*

# 52014DC0300

**DRAFT General Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015 - General Introduction - General statement of revenue - General statement of revenue and expenditure by section /* COM/2014/0300 final - 2014/ () */**

			*

			*

DOCUMENTS

DRAFT
General Budget
of the European Union
for the financial year 2015

—
     General introduction

—
     General statement of revenue

—
     General statement of revenue and expenditure by section:

—
     Section 1:   European Parliament

—      Section 2:   European Council and
Council

—
     Section 3:   Commission

—      Section 4:   Court of Justice of
the European Union

—
     Section 5:   Court of Auditors

—      Section 6:   European Economic
and Social Committee

—
     Section 7:   Committee of the Regions

—      Section 8:   European Ombudsman

—
     Section 9:   European Data Protection Supervisor

—
     Section 10: European
External Action Service

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm
Exhibit 10.44

First Amendment toPledge Agreement 

This First Amendment to PledgeAgreement (the “First Amendment”) is made as of this 28th day ofOctober, 2004 by and among Ascent Assurance, Inc. (the “Pledgor”) and CreditSuisse First Boston LLC (formerly known as Credit Suisse First Boston ManagementCorporation) (the “Pledgee”). 

WITNESSETH 

WHEREAS, the Pledgor and the Pledgeeare parties to that certain pledge agreement dated as of April 17, 2001 (the “PledgeAgreement”); 

WHEREAS, the Pledgor desires to sell100% of the capital stock of Westbridge Printing Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiaryof Pledgor; 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Pledgor andPledgee hereby agree as follows: 

ANEX 1 to the Pledge Agreement isdeleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1027

AUBREY LEON DICKSON, SR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND NATIONAL PARK PLANNING COMMISSION,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Robert W. Titus, District Judge. 

(8:09-cv-01429-RWT)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aubrey Leon Dickson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jared Michael 

McCarthy, MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK & PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Aubrey Leon Dickson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders granting the Defendant’s motions to dismiss, or 

in the alternative, for summary judgment and denying Dickson’s 

second motion to amend or alter judgment. We dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not 

timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period 

is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of 

Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. 

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket 

on October 13, 2009 and November 25, 2009. The notice of appeal 

was filed on December 31, 2009. Because Dickson failed to file 

a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
October 4, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KORI LYNN HENEGAR, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00529-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment adjudicating guilt is 

REFORMED, to read as follows: (1) appellant Kori Lynn Henegar’s plea to 

motion to adjudicate is changed from “true” to “not true”; and (2) the trial court’s 

findings shall include an additional finding under section 5 that appellant violated 

the terms and conditions of community supervision “by failing to perform 

community service.”

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending June 23, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|KANABEC ST BK, MORA, MINNESOTA     | 705958 | 10/03/2011 | 05/25/2012     | S         | Small Bank 
|MONTANA ST BK, PLENTYWOOD, MONTANA | 655651 | 02/13/2012 | 05/30/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us