alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1888 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1888

     To add Native American members to the Advisory Commission on 
          Intergovernmental Relations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 1995

Mr. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To add Native American members to the Advisory Commission on 
          Intergovernmental Relations, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF NATIVE AMERICANS TO ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
              INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS.

    (a) Purpose.--Section 2(1) of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
establish an Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations'' (42 
U.S.C. 4272) is amended by striking ``and local'' and inserting 
``local, and tribal''.
    (b) Membership on Commission.--Section 3 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
4273) is amended--
            (1) In subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``twenty-six'' and inserting 
                ``thirty'';
                    (B) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (6);
                    (C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (7) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding the following at the end:
    ``(8) Four appointed by the President from a panel of at least 
eight elected American Indian or Alaska Native tribal officials, of 
which at least four of such panel are submitted by the Committee on 
Resources of the House of Representatives and four of such panel are 
submitted by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``; of each class of members enumerated 
        in paragraph (8) of subsection (a) of this section, not more 
        than two shall be from any one political party and not more 
        than one shall be from any one State.''.
    (c) Quorum.--Section 4(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 4274(e)) is 
amended by striking ``Thirteen'' and inserting ``Sixteen''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 42114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Kenrock, Inc., John Doe, and Frank Lisa, Case No. 3:05-CV-0057 AS, was 
lodge with the United States District Court for the Northern District 
of Indiana on July 23, 2007. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a 
complaint filed by the United States against the Defendants pursuant to 
Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (``CWA''), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to 
obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the 
Defendants for filling wetlands without a permit.
    The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring 
the Defendants to restore the impacted areas and to pay a civil 
penalty. The Department of Justice will accept written comments 
relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the 
date of publication of this notice. Please address comments to Clifford 
D. Johnson, Assistant United States Attorney, 204 S. Main Street, Room 
M-01, South Bend, Indiana 46601 and refer to United States of America 
v. Kenrock, Inc., John Doe, and Frank Lisa, Case No. 3:05-CV-0057 AS.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, 
South Bend Division, 204 S. Main Street, South Bend, IN 46601. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed on the World Wide 
Web at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Scott Schachter,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 07-3748 Filed 7-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 24, 1995 (72), Para 72.21 Bill Presented to the President]
[Page 815]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.72.21  bill presented to the president

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Administration, reported that 
that committee did on this day present to the President, for his 
approval, a bill of the House of the following title:

       H.R. 1421. An Act to provide that references in the 
     statutes of the United States to any committee or officer of 
     the House of Representatives the name or jurisdiction of 
     which was changed as part of the reorganization of the House 
     of Representatives at the beginning of the One Hundred Fourth 
     Congress shall be treated as referring to the currently 
     applicable committee or officer of the House of 
     Representatives.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 37782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3391]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), July 16, 2007.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Approval of the minutes of the June 19, 2007 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director:
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Legislative Report.
    3. Quarterly Reports:
    a. Investment Policy Review.
    b. Vendor Financial Reports.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: July 9, 2007.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 07-3391 Filed 7-9-07; 11:33 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
98-2226.

#### State ex rel. Tinsler v. Muehlfeld.

In Prohibition. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1444, 703 N.E.2d 325. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, April 3, 1995 (54), Para 54.9 Fishermen's Protection]
[Page 524]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.54.9  fishermen's protection

  Mr. SAXTON moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 716) to 
amend the Fishermen's Protective Act.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, recognized Mr. 
SAXTON and Mr. STUDDS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, announced that two-
thirds of the Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. SAXTON demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, which 
demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the yeas 
and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, pursuant to clause 
5, rule I, announced that further proceedings on the motion were 
postponed.
```
From: mari@mnoy.us [mailto:mari@mnoy.us] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Marilena Noy 

1260 Aguila Avenue 

Coral Gables, FL 33134
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.9 U.S. Air Force Academy]
[Page 1043]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.9  u.s. air force academy

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, announced that pursuant to the 
provisions of section 9355(a) of title 10, United States Code, the 
Speaker did appoint to the Board of Visitors to the United States Air 
Force Academy, Messrs. Young, Hefley, Dicks, and Tanner, on the part of 
the House.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.20 Waiving Points of Order Against Conference Report on H.R.1158]
[Page 782]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.20  waiving points of order against conference report on 
          h.r.1158

  Mr. DREIER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 151):

       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be 
     in order to consider the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations 
     for additional disaster assistance and making rescissions for 
     the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other 
     purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
     and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
     report shall be considered as read.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. DREIER, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
98-2011.

#### State v. Waldrop.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-102. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1446, 703 N.E.2d 326. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.
#### § 1114.4 Documents in Board's files.

If a party offers in evidence any matter contained in a report or other document open to public inspection in the files of the Board, such report or other document need not be made available at the hearing.

[47 FR 49562, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52713, Oct. 8, 1996]
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph C. Pinckney.

Decree affirmed, with costs. '
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

FRANK TOCCI, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10356 

D.C. No. 

2:17-cr-00194-LRH-PAL-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2019**

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Frank Tocci appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 

45-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon 

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10356

Tocci contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the 

court’s reasons for varying upward lacked evidentiary support and both the 

government and the probation officer had recommended a within-Guidelines 

sentence. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 

552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The court was not bound by the parties’ sentencing 

recommendations, and the record reflects that the court varied upward largely 

because of Tocci’s criminal history. To the extent the court relied on Tocci’s 

conduct while in custody and the circumstances of the offense in imposing the 

sentence, the undisputed portions of the presentence report supported the court’s 

findings. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir. 2005) (en 

banc). The above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See 

Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

Insofar as Tocci argues that the district court violated Federal Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 32 at sentencing, we decline to reach that issue, which Tocci 

raised for the first time in his reply brief. See United States v. Kama, 394 F.3d 

1236, 1238 (9th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative. Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-3435 Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
From: claudhudson@gmail.com [mailto:claudhudson@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Claudia Hudson 

1124 Rahway Ave 

Westfield, NJ 07090
#### Will McIver v. The State.

*No. 500.*

*Decided March 9.*

Disturbance of the Peace—Construction of Statute.—The statute (Penal Code, article 314) with regard to boisterous, etc., language and conduct in or near a private house calculated to disturb the inhabitants of such house, does not embrace such language and conduct when indulged in by parties themselves occupying the house, but was enacted to protect such occupants from such disturbances when indulged in by others. Following Hall v. The State, 16 Texas Criminal Appeals, 6.

Appeal from the County Court of Ellis. Tried below before Hon. D. F. Singleton, County Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for disturbance of the [peace, wherein the punishment assessed was a fine of $25.

The opinion sufficiently states the case.

Ho brief for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of disturbing the peace by going into the private house of Merriman, and using profane language, etc. The uncontradicted evidence is, that appellant and Merriman were half-brothers, and lived in the house where the language was used. The undisputed evidence also is, that the trouble originated between appellant and his brother Sam, and finally Merriman interfered, and there was a very considerable amount of boisterous language used by the various parties during their troubles. The contention is, that the evidence does not warrant a conviction. We are of opinion the point is well taken. The statute prohibiting such disturbances and intrusions does not refer to those who occupy the private house referred to therein, but was enacted to protect such occupants from being disturbed by others, and not by themselves. Hall v. The State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 6.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Henderson, Judge, absent.
H

H

H

î î

î

" " "

H

î"

H

H

H

î

î î

"

"

"

H î

"

H H

H

î

î " î

"

"

H î"

H

î "

H

H

î î"

"

H î

"

H î

"

H

H î î

"

"

H

î

î

H

"

H

" î

H î

"

H H

î

î"

"

H

î "

? 4250

4350

4250

4200

4250

4200

4600

4600

4600

4600

4600

4600

4800

4400

5000

4400

4800

4200

4400

4800

4800

4600

4400

4600

4800

5200

5200

5200

4200

4200

4400

4600

4600

5000

5000

4800

4800

4600

4600

4600

4400

4400

4400

4400

4400

4400

Douglas

Municipal

Airport

3 4 T H S T

P E R IL L A R A N C H R D

N R O G E R ' S R A N C H R D

G E R O N IM O T R L

ARIZONA COCHISE CO

D Hill

Perilla

Mountains

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Cinder

Hill

San

Bernardino

Ranch

Douglas

Douglas

NE

East of

Douglas

College

Peaks

34

34

34

61

62

3460

64

63

66

65

34

34

34

34

34

34

71

72

59

34

67

68

34

70

3469

34

34

000m

3461

3460

N

64

34

34

65

62

34

3467

34

34

66

68

3471

3459

69

000m

6

3472

N

643 644 45 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654

6

E

644 645

000m

643000mE 46 647 648 649 650 651 652 653

910 000 FEET

940000 FEET

130

30"

000

FEET

FEET

20'

17' 17'30"

27'

30"

25'

20'

30"

27'

109°

30'

30'

31°22'

109°

30"

109°22'

30"

30"

31°22'

31°

30"

31°

22'

15'

109°

15'

100000

25'

3463

654

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ARIZONA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

EAST OF DOUGLAS, AZ-SON

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

EAST OF DOUGLAS QUADRANGLE

ARIZONA-SONORA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery.....................................................NAIP, June 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2007

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Arizona Coordinate System of 1983 (east

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

XV

12R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 49 ́

14 MILS

9° 52 ́

175 MILS
<PAGE>   1



                                  Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Vector Aeromotive Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-65335) as amended and
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-01331 and 333-00073) and prospectuses included therein,
of our reports dated February 16, 1996, on our audits of the financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Vector Aeromotive Corporation as
of December 31, 1995 and for each of the years ended December 31, 1995,
September 30, 1994, September 30, 1993 and the three months ended December 31,
1994, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                BDO Seidman, LLP

Orlando, Florida
March 28, 1996
#### § 1014.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1014.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24-D



                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints DOUGLAS D. BURKETT, PH.D. and BRADLEY C. ANDERSON, and each of them,
his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2002, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Special Power of Attorney has been executed as
of November 13, 2002.

                                          /s/ JOSEPH HINES
                                          -------------------
                                              JOSEPH HINES
#### § 1580.103 [Reserved]