alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 106.120 Appeal deadline. ( a ) *Appeal of a final rule or withdrawal of a notice of proposed rulemaking.* If you appeal PHMSA's issuance of a final rule or PHMSA's withdrawal of a proposed rulemaking, your appeal document must reach us no later than 30 days after the date PHMSA published the regulation or the withdrawal notice in the Federal Register. After that time, PHMSA will consider your appeal to be a petition for rulemaking under § 106.100.
( b ) *Appeal of a decision.* If you appeal PHMSA's decision on a petition for rulemaking, your appeal document must reach us no later than 30 days from the date PHMSA served you with written notice of PHMSA's decision.
[70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1722

  To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act) to 
require that contract work covered by the Act which requires licensing 
              be performed by a person who is so licensed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1995

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
       to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act) to 
require that contract work covered by the Act which requires licensing 
              be performed by a person who is so licensed.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LICENSING.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(known as the Davis-Bacon Act) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``A contract covered by this subsection which is to be 
carried out in a State which requires persons performing the work under 
the contract to be licensed shall be carried out by a person who is so 
licensed.''.
                                 <all>
```
32.1
            CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.





I,
Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer of Adino Energy Corporation,
hereby certify that to my knowledge, Adino Energy Corporation’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Adino Energy
Corporation.





Date:
August 11, 2010





/s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.Timothy
      G. Byrd, Sr.
BEFORE THE COMMISSION OF FIVE JUDGES APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint against Elizabeth Burick

Case No. 98-2266

Dated: January 27,1999

STATEMENT OF COSTS AND INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING PAYMENT OF • MONETARY SANCTIONS

The following is a statement of the costs incurred by the Commission of five judges appointed pursuant to Rule II, Section 5 of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio to review the report of the Hearing Panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in the above-captioned case. These costs are in addition to the expenses certified by the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline on October 27, 1998 and November 4, 1998. This statement of costs is entered pursuant to order of the Commission of five judges entered on January 22,1999.

Total Costs (Postage and Express Mail) $175.75

The January 22, 1999 Commission order also directed the Secretary of the Commission to provide instructions to the respondent regarding the payment of all monetary sanctions. The respondent is hereby instructed to pay the fine of $7,500.00 and costs totaling $1,407.98 to the Supreme Court by certified check or money order on or before May 24, 1999. The respondent is further instructed to pay attorney fees and expenses totaling $5,000.00 to the complainant by certified check or money order on or before May 24, 1999 and certify payment to the Secretary of the Commission. If the monetary sanctions are not paid in full on or before the required dates, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue on the balance of unpaid sanctions, the respondent will be found in contempt, and the matter will be referred to the office of the Attorney 'General for collection.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION.

Richard A. Dove Secretary to the Commission
98-2496.

#### State v. Draughon.

Franklin App. No. 97APA11-1536. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
§ 178.337-11 Emergency discharge control. ( a ) *Emergency discharge control equipment.* Emergency discharge control equipment must be installed in a liquid discharge line as specified by product and service in § 173.315(n) of this subchapter. The performance and certification requirements for emergency discharge control equipment are specified in § 173.315(n) of this subchapter and are not a part of the cargo tank motor vehicle certification made under this specification.
( b ) *Engine fuel lines.* On a truck-mounted cargo tank, emergency discharge control equipment is not required on an engine fuel line of not more than 3 ⁄ 4 NPT equipped with a valve having an integral excess flow valve or excess flow feature.
[64 FR 28050, May 24, 1999]
98-1980.

#### State v. Arnold.

Greene App. No. 91CA43. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1458, 700 N.E.2d 876. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
-----Original Message----- 

From: carolynpegg@yahoo.com [mailto:carolynpegg@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lyn Clark Pegg 

1335 Minnesota Ave 

Duluth, MN 55802
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         360,271
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         115,520
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               134,564
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,334,575
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      6,186,392
<ALLOWANCE>                                     87,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,102,459
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,981,245
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,166,329
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             92,961
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           904
<OTHER-SE>                                     761,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,102,459
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                597,975
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              114,981
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               712,956
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             241,007
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,520
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          347,527
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   13,423
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,817
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                309,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                146,882
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     146,882
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.11
<LOANS-NON>                                     52,939
<LOANS-PAST>                                    21,574
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    65
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                89,983
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   24,552
<RECOVERIES>                                     9,051
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               87,905
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            87,905
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Patrick Ready, Administrator, Respondent, v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.;

Brady, J., dissenting.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1874 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To modify the boundaries of the Talladega National Forest, Alabama.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To modify the boundaries of the Talladega National Forest, Alabama.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF TALLADEGA NATIONAL FOREST.

    (a) Boundary Modification.--The exterior boundaries of the 
Talladega National Forest is hereby modified to include the following 
described lands:
             Huntsville Meridian, Township 17 South, Range 8 East, 
        Section 34, NE\1/4\, SW\1/4\, and S\1/2\NW\1/4\, Cleburne 
        County, containing 399.40 acres, more or less.
            Huntsville Meridian, Township 13 South, Range 9 East, 
        Section 28, SE\1/4\, Calhoun County, containing 160.00 acres, 
        more or less.
    (b) Administration.--(1) Subject to valid existing rights, all 
Federal lands described under subsection (a) are hereby added to and 
shall be administered as part of the Talladega National Forest, and the 
Secretary of the Interior shall transfer, without reimbursement, 
administrative jurisdiction over such lands to the Secretary of 
Agriculture.
    (2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the 
validity of or the terms and conditions of any existing right-of-way, 
easement, lease, license, or permit on lands transferred by subsection 
(a), except that such lands shall be administered by the Forest 
Service. Reissuance of any authorization shall be in accordance with 
the laws and regulations generally applying to the Forest Service, and 
the change of jurisdiction over such lands resulting from the enactment 
of this Act shall not constitute a ground for the denial of renewal or 
reissuance of such authorization.
            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, April 5, 1995 (56), Para 56.23 Adjournment]
[Page 577]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.56.23  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. SOLOMON, at 12 o'clock midnight, the House adjourned.
```
§ 172.300 Applicability. ( a ) Each person who offers a hazardous material for transportation shall mark each package, freight container, and transport vehicle containing the hazardous material in the manner required by this subpart.
( b ) When assigned the function by this subpart, each carrier that transports a hazardous material shall mark each package, freight container, and transport vehicle containing the hazardous material in the manner required by this subpart.
( c ) Unless otherwise provided in a specific rule, stocks of preprinted packagings marked in accordance with this subpart prior to the effective date of a final rule may be continued in use, in the manner previously authorized, until depleted or for a one-year period subsequent to the compliance date of the marking amendment, whichever is less.
[Amdt. 172-101, 45 FR 74666, Nov. 10, 1980, as amended at 76 FR 3365, Jan. 19, 2011]
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00435

- CR

Norma Elizabeth Sanchez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1363471 )

February 8, 2018

Opi nion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2298 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2298

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 
            for employer-provided dependent care assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2009

   Mr. Yarmuth (for himself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Ms. Linda T. 
 Sanchez of California, and Mr. Roskam) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 
            for employer-provided dependent care assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Dependent and Child Care 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED DEPENDENT CARE 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 129(a)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dependent care assistance 
programs) is amended by striking ``$5,000 ($2,500'' and inserting 
``$7,500 (half such dollar amount''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Paragraph (2) of section 129(a) of such 
Code is amended by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D) 
and by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2010, 
                the $7,500 amount in subparagraph (A) shall be 
                increased by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins, 
                        determined by substituting `calendar year 2009' 
                        for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                Any increase determined under the preceding sentence 
                shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: xjason@comcast.net [mailto:xjason@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jason Himmelberger 

PO Box 110 

Rehrersburg, PA 19550
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.4 Communication from the Clerk--Message from the President]
[Page 826]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.4  communication from the clerk--message from the president

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, June 7, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     The Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 5 of Rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed 
     envelope received from the White House on Tuesday, June 6, 
     1995 at 2:45 p.m. and said to contain a message from the 
     President whereby he transmits a report on the activities of 
     the United States Government relating to the prevention of 
     nuclear proliferation for calendar year 1994.
           With warm regards,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
                                                            Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                             
                                                                   
<ARTICLE>      5
                                                                   
<S>                             <C>                                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998     
<CASH>                                             305,307
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      110,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,000
<INVENTORY>                                        478,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   949,616
<PP&E>                                              33,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,144,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              165,904
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,144,636
<SALES>                                          2,049,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,049,856
<CGS>                                            1,277,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,277,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   810,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     14,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        14,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01
                             
                                                     

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.30-21 Inspection prior to transfer. No person may transfer to or from a portable tank or IBC a product with a flashpoint of less than 300 °F unless the person in charge of the transfer determines that— ( a ) Each warning signal and sign required in §§ 98.30-33 and 98.30-35 is displayed;
( b ) No repair work in the vicinity of any portable tank or IBC is done without permission of the person in charge of the transfer operation; and
( c ) Riveting, welding, burning, or a similar operation is not done in the vicinity of a portable tank or IBC unless an inspection by the person in charge of the transfer ensures that the operation can be done safely.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]