alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 110

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 110.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth procedures for grants to States, Territories, and Indian tribes to support emergency planning and training to respond to hazardous materials emergencies, particularly those involving transportation. Grants may also be used to enhance the implementation of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11001 *et seq.*). For information regarding the Hazardous Materials Instructor Training, Supplemental Public Sector Training, and Community Safety grants, please refer to PHMSA's website at: *https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/*.

[84 FR 3999, Feb. 14, 2019]
§ 172.550 OXIDIZER placard. ( a ) Except for size and color, the OXIDIZER placard must be as follows:
( b ) In addition to complying with § 172.519, the background color on the OXIDIZER placard must be yellow. The symbol, text, division number and inner border must be black.
[Amdt. 172-123, 56 FR 66263, Dec. 20, 1991]
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### FEB 27 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DERRAL SCHRODER, a De Jure People for the Freely Associated Compact States of our Union, a Non-citizen of the De Facto Federal Government of D.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; REGISTERED VOTING CITIZENS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; CITIZENS OF THE CORPORATE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, that vote for their rulers, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-1320 (D.C. No. 96-K-1018) (District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, PORFILIO , Circuit Judge, and MURPHY , Circuit Judge.- 2 -

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Claiming to be “a People for the Freely Associated Compact States of Our Union, that has pledged his Life, fortune and Sacred Honor to forcing the Government Employees to recognize and respect [his] true character as a People of the Almighty Creator,” Derral Schroder appeals the dismissal of his complaint by the district court. Mr. Schroder had brought an almost indecipherable action naming as defendants: “People of the State of Colorado, Registered Voting citizens of the Federal Government of the District of Columbia, Citizens of the Corporate Federal Government, [sic] that Vote for their Rulers.” The district court, sua sponte, dismissed the action on the ground the complaint failed to name any suable entity. We agree and AFFIRM

.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
#### William Hecht, Respondent, *v.*A. G. Hyde *&*Sons, Appellant.

Reported below, 139 App. Div. 902.

(Argued September 26, 1910;

decided October 4, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action on contract.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous, that permission to appeal had not been obtained and that the exceptions were frivolous.

*Morton Stein*for motion.

*James J. Allen*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### Richard Muller, Doing Business under the Name of Muller Gloria Mills, Appellant, *v.*Antoine Guichard, Doing Business under the Name of A. Guichard *&*Co., Respondent.

*Muller*v. *Guichard,*133 App. Div. 944, affirmed.

(Submitted October 5, 1910;

decided October 25, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 16, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of sale.

*Morris J. Ilirseh*and *Herbert B. Limburg*for appellant.

*Chester A. Jayne*and *John L,. Wilkie*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1880 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 423
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1880

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 1995

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                              May 23, 1996

               Reported by Mr. Stevens, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 102 
 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ``Edward Madigan Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 102 South McLean, 
Lincoln, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``Edward 
Madigan Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Edward Madigan Post Office Building''.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 423

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1880

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 102 
 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ``Edward Madigan Post Office 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
[Crim. No. 262.

Second Appellate District.

November 23, 1912.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. KATE MEASOR, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Failure to Give Statutory Notice—Failure to File Points and Authorities or to Appeal—Absence op Error— Affirmance of Judgment.—Where the record upon appeal fails to disclose that notice has been given as required by section 1247 of the Penal Code, under the provisions of which the appeal was ineffectual, and where no points and authorities have been filed, and there was no appearance for argument, and upon examination of the record no prejudicial error appears therein, the judgment will be affirmed.

*407APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. Z. B. West, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Henry W. Nisbet, and Dick Foye Harding, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General,. and George Beebe, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

ALLEN, P. J.

At thecalling of the calendar for the October term, upon which calendar this cause appeared, attention of counsel for appellant was called to the fact that the record failed to disclose that notice had been given as required by section 1247 of the Penal Code, without which notice, by the provisions of said section, an appeal was ineffectual. It was then stated by counsel that such notice had been given, and a diminution of the record was suggested and permission given to the defendant to supplement her record with a copy of such notice. No oral argument was made, but counsel for defendant obtained ten days’ time within which to file points and authorities in support of the appeal. No points and authorities have been filed; the defect in the record has not been cured; and, in addition, in order that injustice might not be done the defendant by reason of the neglect of her counsel, we have taken the trouble to examine the record and we find no prejudicial error therein. The judgment is, therefore, ordered affirmed.

James, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 16, 2012

|Filer                              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCSHARES, INC. | 4c8            | Southern Missouri Bancshares, Inc., Marshfield, Missouri, to engage in lending activities. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.448 General transportation requirements. ( a ) Each shipment of Class 7 (radioactive) materials must be secured to prevent shifting during normal transportation conditions.
( b ) Except as provided in §§ 174.81, 176.83, and 177.848 of this subchapter, or as otherwise required by the Competent Authority in the applicable certificate, a package or overpack of Class 7 (radioactive) materials may be carried among packaged general cargo without special stowage provisions, if— ( 1 ) The heat output in watts does not exceed 0.1 times the minimum package dimension in centimeters; or
( 2 ) The average surface heat flux of the package or overpack does not exceed 15 watts per square meter and the immediately surrounding cargo is not in sacks or bags or otherwise in a form that would seriously impede air circulation for heat removal.
( c ) Packages or overpacks bearing labels prescribed in § 172.403 of this subchapter may not be carried in compartments occupied by passengers, except in those compartments exclusively reserved for couriers accompanying those packages.
( d ) Mixing of different kinds of packages that include fissile packages is authorized only in accordance with § 173.459.
( e ) No person shall offer for transportation or transport aboard a passenger-carrying aircraft any single package or overpack with a transport index greater than 3.0.
( f ) No person shall offer for transportation or transport aboard a passenger-carrying aircraft any Class 7 (radioactive) material unless that material is intended for use in, or incident to, research, medical diagnosis or treatment.
( g ) If an overpack is used to consolidate individual packages or to enclose a single package of Class 7 (radioactive) materials, the package(s) must comply with the packaging, marking, and labeling requirements of this subchapter, and: ( 1 ) The overpack must be labeled as prescribed in § 172.403(h) of this subchapter;
( 2 ) The overpack must be marked as prescribed in subpart D of part 172 of this subchapter and § 173.25(a); and
( 3 ) The transport index of the overpack may not exceed 3.0 for passenger-carrying aircraft shipments, or 10.0 for cargo-aircraft shipments.
[69 FR 3691, Jan. 26, 2004]
EXHIBIT 31.1

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

Certification PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Randy Stevens, certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation;
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date May 7, 2004 			 /s/ T. Randy Stevens

					 T. Randy Stevens, Chief Executive Officer and President
# Assignment of Functions Under Section 1035 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby assign to the Secretary of Defense the functions of the President under section 1035 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364). The Secretary of State, and the heads of other executive departments and agencies identified in the report required under section 1035, should concur with the report.

                        The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 07-3254

Billing code 5000-04-M
#### § 1580.207 Harmonization of Federal regulation of nuclear facilities.

TSA will coordinate activities under this subpart with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Department of Energy (DOE) with respect to regulation of rail hazardous materials shippers and receivers that are also licensed or regulated by the NRC or DOE under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, to maintain consistency with the requirements imposed by the NRC and DOE.
98-2187.

#### Hatcher v. State.

Richland App. No. 98CA77. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Richland County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due December 7,1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 140 (Monday, July 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 40152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 06-11]


R.O. White and Company, Inc. and Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. 
Port of Miami Terminal Operating Company, L.L.C., Continental 
Stevedoring and Terminals, Inc., Florida Stevedoring, Inc., P&O Ports 
North America, Inc., P&O Ports Florida, Inc., Eller-ITO Stevedoring 
Company L.L.C., Dante B. Fascell Port of Miami-Dade, aka Miami-Dade 
County Seaport Department, Miami-Dade County; Notice of Amended 
Complaint

    Notice is given that an amended complaint has been filed with the 
Federal Maritime Commission by R.O. White & Company, Inc., and Ceres 
Marine Terminals, Inc., against Port of Miami Terminal Operating 
Company, L.L.C., Continental Stevedoring & Terminals, Inc., Florida 
Stevedoring, Inc., P&O Ports North America, Inc., P&O Ports Florida, 
Inc., Eller-ITO Stevedoring Company L.L.C., and Dante B. Fascell Port 
of Miami-Dade, a.k.a. Miami-Dade County Seaport Department. The Amended 
Complaint names Miami-Dade County as a respondent in the original 
proceeding noticed at 71 FR 70965.

    By the Commission.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-3553 Filed 7-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (380)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,330
<PP&E>                                          16,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,848
<BONDS>                                          6,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,899
<SALES>                                          8,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,775
<CGS>                                            5,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    419
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>