```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.14 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 762-768]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.14  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment in the nature of a substitute 
submitted by Mr. NEUMANN:

       Strike out all after the resolving clause and insert in 
     lieu thereof the following:

     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 1996.

       The Congress determines and declares that this resolution 
     is the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
     1996, including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal 
     years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as required by 
     section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the 
     fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 1996, 
     October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, October 1, 
     2000, and October 1, 2001:
       (1) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,056,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,057,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,096,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,138,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,187,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,240,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,300,500,000,000.

     and the amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be increased are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $13,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: -$26,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: -$38,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: -$48,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: -$57,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$70,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: -$80,500,000,000.

     and the amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act 
     revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels 
     of Federal revenues are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $101,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $105,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $110,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $115,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $120,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $125,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $130,900,000,000.
       (2) The appropriate levels of total new budget authority 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,219,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,236,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,251,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,253,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,275,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,312,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,359,600,000,000.
       (3) The appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,238,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,245,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,251,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,233,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,260,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,302,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,352,400,000,000.
       (4) The amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $182,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $188,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $154,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $94,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $73,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $62,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $51,900,000,000.
       (5) The appropriate levels of the public debt are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $5,214,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,470,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,697,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $5,896,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,081,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,157,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,216,000,000,000.
       (6) The appropriate levels of total Federal credit activity 
     for the fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 
     1996, October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, 
     October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2001 are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $18,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $170,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $17,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $167,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $16,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $165,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $15,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $162,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $14,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $159,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $14,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $159,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $14,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $159,400,000.000.

     SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, new primary loan guarantee commitments, and 
     new secondary loan guarantee commitments for fiscal years 
     1996 through 2002 for each major functional category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $261,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $260,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $265,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $263,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $270,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $270,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

[[Page 763]]

       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $3,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $12,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $9,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $6,800,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $4,000,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $4,000,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $4,000,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $20,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.

[[Page 764]]

       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $2,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$7,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $110,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $80,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$1,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $50,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $-2,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $25,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$3,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$3,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$3,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $97,500,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $29,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $32,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $31,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $32,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $31,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $27,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $30,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $29,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $31,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $32,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $32,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $51,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $42,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $41,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $41,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $42,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $42,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

[[Page 765]]

       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $44,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $118,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $116,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $120,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $119,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $123,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $122,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $127,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $124,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $131,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $130,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $133,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $133,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $136,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $136,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $171,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $170,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $181,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $179,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $191,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $189,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $202,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $200,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $213,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $210,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $223,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $223,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $236,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $236,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $205,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $214,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $208,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $216,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $214,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $218,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $220,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $220,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $229,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $229,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $233,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $233,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $237,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $237,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $4,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $4,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $4,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $36,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $37,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $37,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,000,000,000.

[[Page 766]]

       (B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $41,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $41,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $43,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $27,400,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $297,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $297,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $305,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $305,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $309,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $309,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $315,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $315,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $321,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $321,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $326,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $326,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $332,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $332,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$12,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$15,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$13,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$15,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$13,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$32,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$38,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$38,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$32,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays,
       (C) New direct loan obligations, -$32,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$20,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$20,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$31,300,000,000.

[[Page 767]]

       (B) Outlays, -$31,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$31,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$31,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$31,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$31,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$35,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$35,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$36,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$36,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$35,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$35,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$37,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$37,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

     SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

       (a) Not later than July 14, 1995, the House committees 
     named in subsections (b) through (o) of this section shall 
     submit their recommendations to the House Budget Committee. 
     After receiving those recommendations, the House Budget 
     Committee shall report to the House a reconciliation bill or 
     resolution or both carrying out all such recommendations 
     without any substantive revision.
       (b) The House Committee on Agriculture shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $6,200,000,000 in budget authority and $6,200,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $11,500,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $11,500,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $14,400,000,000 in budget authority and $14,400,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $17,100,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $17,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $19,400,000,000 in budget authority and $19,400,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $21,100,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $21,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $23,600,000,000 in budget authority and $23,600,000,000 
     in fiscal year 2002.
       (c) The House Committee on Banking and Financial Services 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority 
     and outlays as follows: $800,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $800,000,000 in 
     budget authority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     1997, $800,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $800,000,000 in budget authority 
     and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $800,000,000 
     in budget authority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2000, $800,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $800,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $800,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (d) The House Committee on Commerce shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $19,900,000,000 in budget authority and $19,300,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $36,800,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $37,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $55,900,000,000 in budget authority and $56,100,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $80,300,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $79,700,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $100,600,000,000 in budget authority and $100,800,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $124,900,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $124,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     2001, and $148,400,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $148,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (e) The House Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $1,600,000,000 in budget authority and $1,600,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $2,500,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,500,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $2,600,000,000 in budget authority and $2,600,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $2,800,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and $2,900,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $3,100,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $3,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $3,300,000,000 in budget authority and $3,300,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (f) The House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority 
     and outlays as follows: $1,800,000,000 in budget authority 
     and $1,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $2,600,000,000 in budget authority and $2,600,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1997, $2,900,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, 
     $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and $2,900,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1999, $2,900,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, 
     $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and $2,900,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $2,900,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $2,900,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (g) The House Committee on International Relations shall 
     report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 
     direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and 
     outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays 
     in fiscal year 2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (h) The House Committee on the Judiciary shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $750,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $1,000,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $900,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $1,000,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $1,000,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $1,000,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $1,000,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (i) The House Committee on National Security shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2000, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 
     2002.
       (j) The House Committee on Resources shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $4,200,000,000 in budget authority and $4,100,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $5,800,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $5,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $5,000,000,000 in budget authority and $5,000,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1998, $3,900,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $3,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $4,000,000,000 in budget authority and $4,000,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 2000, $3,400,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $3,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $3,400,000,000 in budget authority and $3,400,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2002.
       (k) The House Committee on Science shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, 
     $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, 
     and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.
       (l) The House Committee on Small Business shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1999, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2000, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2001, and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 
     2002.
       (m) The House Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce budget authority and outlays as follows: 
     $5,000,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in 
     fiscal year 1996, $8,200,000,000 in budget authority and $0 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $8,500,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, 
     $8,800,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in 
     fiscal year 1999, $9,100,000,000 in budget authority and $0 
     in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $9,400,000,000 in budget 
     authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and 
     $9,800,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 
     2002.

[[Page 768]]

       (n) The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays as 
     follows: $1,100,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $1,200,000,000 
     in budget authority and $1,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1997, $1,300,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $1,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, $1,900,000,000 
     in budget authority and $1,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 1999, $2,100,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $2,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $2,100,000,000 
     in budget authority and $2,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     year 2001, and $2,400,000,000 in budget authority and 
     $2,600,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (o) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to reduce 
     the deficit, as follows: $45,300,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $32,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $39,300,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 1998, $52,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1999, 
     $66,700,000,000 in fiscal year 2000, $82,100,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 2001, and $97,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
       (p) For purposes of this section, the term ``direct 
     spending'' has the meaning given to such term in section 
     250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
     Control Act of 1985 and the term ``new budget authority'' has 
     the meaning given to such term in section 3(2) of the 
     Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

     SEC. 5. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING SOCIAL SECURITY.

       It is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
     legislation should be enacted that:
       (1) Prohibits the use of the surplus funds collected as 
     part of the social security payroll tax from being used to 
     balance the budget or reduce the deficit.
       (2) Starting in 1996, sets aside these surplus funds to 
     preserve and protect the social security system.
       (3) Establishes a bipartisan commission to oversee the 
     protection of these surplus funds, the primary purpose of 
     which is to establish a safe and secure mechanism to preserve 
     these funds.
       (4) Provides that as the Federal debt is repaid, the social 
     security funds that are currently part of the 
     $4,900,000,000,000 Federal debt as well as interest on these 
     funds shall also be repaid and set aside under the mechanism 
     established under paragraphs (2) and (3).

     SEC. 6. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING DEBT REPAYMENT.

       It is the sense of the House of Representatives that:
       (1) The Congress has a basic moral and ethical 
     responsibility to future generations to repay the Federal 
     debt. The Congress should enact a plan that not only balances 
     the budget but also institutes a regimen for paying off the 
     Federal debt.
       (2) After the budget is balanced, spending should be 
     allowed to grow at a rate slower than expected revenues so 
     that a surplus is created which can be used to begin paying 
     off the debt.
       (3) Such a plan should be enacted into law so that this 
     generation can save our children and grandchildren from the 
     crushing burdens of the Federal debt. 

It was decided in the

Yeas

89

negative

Nays

342
```