alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04122

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04122\04112_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

04122\04122_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

04122\04122_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04122\04122_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04122\04122_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04122\04122_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04122\04122_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04122\04122_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04122\4122_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04122\Supporting Documentation\04112_PPLBrunnerIsland_AB6 EA-ES.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04122\Supporting Documentation\04112_PPLBrunnerIsland_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04112_PPLBrunnerIsland_POND-1_091410.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPL_BrunnerIsland_WWT-1_091010.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPLBrunner Island_WB-1_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPLBrunnerIsland_MAP-1_091310.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPLBrunnerIsland_PIC_4-15-05.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPLBrunnerIsland_WWT-1 Eng Rep.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPLBrunnerIsland_WWT-1_090910.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04122\Supporting Documentation\04122_PPLBrunnerIsland_WWT-A Eng Rep.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
October 10, 2012

Mr. David Chin

6410 Lagunitas Avenue

El Cerrito, CA 94530

Dear Mr. Chin:

This is in response to your September 11, 2012 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA2012-0993) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Audrey Chin for an 

exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

That exemption, if granted, would allow Audrey to exceed the specified weight limit for an 

FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during 

use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

Your daughter Audrey is within the height and weight limits to be able to use CAReS, an 

FAA approved Child Restraint System (CRS). In addition, the Special Tomato device would 

be considered an Orthotic Positioning Device (OPD), and does not require an exemption to 

be used during any phase of flight. It is considered the same as a neck brace or a back brace 

that provides support for the person. The aircraft seatbelt is the "restraint". The OPD is not a 

child restraint device. 

An FAA guidance document has been attached that addresses this issue (FAA FSAT 05-01). 

It states that the OPD may be used during all phases of flight by a person with disabilities in 

order to be positioned so the aircraft seatbelt can be used effectively as the primary method of 

restraint. The OPD is simply used to provide Audrey with support and may not be attached 

to the aircraft seat. The aircraft seat belt is the primary method of restraint. The FAA 

approved CAReS child restraint is then used in conjunction with the seatbelt.

Air carriers are only required by FAA regulations to allow the use of FAA approved CRS on 

aircraft. Ultimately, an air carrier could deny the use of this positioning device (Special 

Tomato) and the air carrier would be in compliance with FAA regulations. However, 14 

CFR part 382, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel, generally requires 

air carriers to make reasonable accommodations for passengers with disabilities as long as 

they do not conflict with an FAA safety rule. 
2

The use of an OPD does not conflict with FAA safety rules (as clarified in the attached FAA 

guidance document), if the following conditions are met: 

(1) The person has a disability;

(2) The OPD does not attach to the airplane seat;

(3) The OPD has internal straps to help position the person; and 

(4) The airplane seat belt is the primary restraint for all phases of flight. 

Because the relief you seek is not necessary, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Raymond Towles

Acting Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
#### The Acme Coal Mining Company v. Ranson et al.

Tlie facts in tliis case being tbe same as in *The Acme Coal Mining Co. v. McIver, ante,*p. 267, tbe judgment is reversed for tbe reasons there given.

*Appeal from the District Court of Boulder County.*

*282Mr. H. B. Johnson, for appellant.

Mr. R. H. Whiteley, for appellees.

Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellees brought suit against appellant for damages resulting from the death of a minor son, aged 16 years, who was instantly killed, with George Mclver, on the 28th day of December, 1892, in the mine of appellant.

The facts, pleadings, evidence and instructions of the court and result in this case were the same as in *The Acme Coal Mining Company v. McIver, ante,*p. 267, except that the judgment in this case was for $2,000.

Being in all respects identical, they were consolidated by counsel for argument in this court and submitted upon the same briefs. The result in this must be the same as in the former, and for the same reasons there given.

The judgment will be reversed and cause remanded.

*Reversed.*
#### Morris Manson et al., Respondents, *v.*The Metropolitan Surety Company et al., Appellants.

*Manson*v. *Metropolitan Surety Co.,*128 App. Div. 577, affirmed.

(Argued October 17, 1910;

decided November 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial, department, entered November 19, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a policy of insurance against burglary.

*John Burlinson Coleman*and *Edward It. Finch*for appellants.

*George Ryall*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ.
#### Andrew Nagle *v.*Catharine Junker.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to be paid by Bissell and Hoffman. Opinion by

Hardin, J.;

Maoomber, J., not sitting.
89–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–163

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

JULY 25, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 209]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 209, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule

reported on the legislative day of Thursday, July 26, 2001, providing for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 2620) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and

Housing and Urban Development and for sundry independent

agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 91.60-45 American Bureau of Shipping. ( a ) The American Bureau of Shipping, with its home office at ABS Plaza, 16855 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060, is hereby designated as an organization duly authorized to issue the “Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate” to certain cargo ships on behalf of the United States of America as provided in Regulation 12, chapter I, of the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, and Executive Order 12234 and the certificate shall be subject to the requirements in this subpart. The American Bureau of Shipping is authorized to place the official seal of the United States of America on the certificate. This designation and delegation to the American Bureau of Shipping shall be in effect until terminated by proper authority and notice of cancellation is published in the Federal Register.
( b ) At the option of the owner or agent of a vessel on an international voyage and on direct application to the American Bureau of Shipping, the Bureau may issue to such vessel a Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate, having a period of validity of not more than 60 months after ascertaining that the vessel: ( 1 ) Has met the applicable requirements of the Convention; and,
( 2 ) Is currently classed by the Bureau and classification requirements have been dealt with to the satisfaction of the Bureau.
( c ) When the Bureau determines that a vessel to which it has issued a Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate no longer complies with the Bureau's applicable requirements for classification, the Bureau shall immediately furnish to the Coast Guard all relevant information, which will be used by the Coast Guard to determine whether or not to withdraw, revoke or suspend the Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16974, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30661, July 26, 1990; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50729, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58461, Sept. 29, 2000]
#### § 1242.69 Clearing wrecks (account XX-52-63).

Separate common expenses according to specific circumstances.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending November 21, 2009

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|COMERICA BANK                         | * Branch       | Comerica Bank, Dallas, Texas, to establish a branch at 1212 S. Pacific Coast Hwy., Redondo Beach, California 90277.                                                                                   | Newspaper:12/05/2009Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:                            | 12/05/2009    
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable
|COMMUNITY TRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A5          | Community Trust Financial Corporation, Ruston, Louisiana, to acquire by merger Madison Financial Corporation, Madison, Mississippi, and indirectly acquire Madison County Bank, Madison, Mississippi. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/14/2009     
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | 12/14/2009    
|HERITAGE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION   | Member         | Heritage Bank, Pearland, Texas, to become  a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                                                                    | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2010 (January 1, 2010 - March 31, 2010)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 8, 1995 (76), Para 76.4 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 835]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.76.4  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Mr. KASICH, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule today: the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services, the Committee on Commerce, the Committee 
on Economic and Educational Opportunities, the Committee on the 
Judiciary, the Committee on Resources, the Committee on Science, the 
Committee on Small Business, and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure.
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7525

GREGORY K. CLINTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHERYL DEAN RILEY, in her individual capacity , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Omar Jawdat Aboulhosn , Magistrate Judge . ( 3:20

- cv
- 00151

- TEJ

- OJA )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Gregory K. Clinton , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory K. Clinton seeks to appeal the magistrate judge ’s order denying Clinton’s motion for appointment of counsel in his underlying civil action, filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971 ). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Clinton seeks to appeal is neither a final order n or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Miller v.
Simmons , 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly , we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction . We deny Clinton’s motions for summary judgment and to amend his appeal
and correct the judgment. We further deny as moot Clinton’s motion to expedite and for release pending resolution of this appeal . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
LAKE
TAPPAN

PATERSON

BROOK s>

HACKENSACK

PASSAIC

EXPLANATION

SEDIMENTARY ROCKS

Trb

Brunswick Formation

Reddish brown mudstone, siltstone, and
sandstone.

gf
oO Trl
Lockatong Formation

Argillite, altered to hornfels adjacent to
diabase. Intertongues with Stockton Formation.

TRIASSIC

TTT
TT!

tt
Stockton Formation

Light-colored arkosic sandstone and minor
red sandstone and shale.

Newark Group

NEWARK

IGNEOUS ROCKS

Trd

Diabase

Contact
(not shown where buried beneath swamp deposits)

oe am

Fault

Section A-A' shown in figure 4.

3 Miles

1
5 Kilometers

Geology modified chiefly from Geologic Map of New
Jersey, Atlas sheet no 40, and in part after Van
Houten, 1965

Figure 3.-- Geologic map of consolidated rock units in the
Hackensack River basin
#### § 69.67 Marking of cargo spaces.

Cargo spaces used in determining volume (Vc) for calculating net tonnage must be permanently marked with the letters “CC” (cargo compartment) which are at least four inches in height and positioned so as to be visible at all times.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00485-CV

MOHAMMED “MIKE” ALI, D/B/A 

TIMELESS JEWELERS, FARAH ALI, AND 

ALL OCCUPANTS OF SPACE NO. 1176,

Appellants

V.

PARKS AT ARLINGTON, LLC, Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2022-006382-1)

May 18, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the county court’s order. It is ordered that the county court’s order is 

affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellants Mohammed “Mike” Ali, d/b/a Timeless 

Jewelers, Farah Ali, and All Occupants of Space No. 1176 shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
#### § 1242.18 Communication systems (account XX-19-20).

Separate common expenses on the basis of the common expense separation in:

Way and Structures—Administration—Track, Bridges and Culverts, and Signals (accounts XX-19-02 to XX-19-04, inclusive)

Equipment—Administration—Locomotives and Other Equipment (accounts XX-26-01 and XX-27-01)

Transportation—Administration—Train, Yard, and Administrative Support (accounts XX-51-01, XX-52-01, and XX-55-01)

Dispatching Trains (Account XX-51-58)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.27 Memorials]
[Page 894]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.27  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       110. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of New Hampshire, relative to 
     the Clean Air Act amendments; to the Committee on Commerce.
       111. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Colorado, 
     relative to protection of the fourth amendment; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
```
#### Gardner Foster, *Respondent, v.*Rufus B. Bullock, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
§ 69.25 Penalties. ( a ) *General violation.* The vessel owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, and individual in charge of a vessel in violation of a regulation in this part are each liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $30,000. Each day of a continuing violation is a separate violation. The vessel also is liable in rem for the penalty.
( b ) *False Statements.* A person knowingly making a false statement or representation in a matter in which a statement or representation is required by this part is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $30,000 for each false statement or representation. The vessel also is liable in rem for the penalty.
[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18720, Mar. 31, 2016]
#### § 1.37 Assistant Secretary for Administration.

The Assistant Secretary for Administration is the principal advisor to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary on Department-wide administrative matters and is the final authority on these matters within the Department. The Assistant Secretary for Administration serves as the Designated Agency Safety and Health Official. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration's responsibilities include: Strategic management of human capital; monitoring the progress of departmental offices related to sustainability goals; controls and standards to ensure that procurement and financial assistance programs are in accord with good business practice; follow-up and resolution of Government Accountability Office and Inspector General audit reviews; information resource management; property management information; facilities; and security. The Assistant Secretary for Administration is responsible for recommending performance objectives for the Operating Administrations' Directors of Human Resources. The Assistant Secretary for Administration participates with each Administrator in the hiring decisions (other than in the Federal Aviation Administration) and performance reviews of all of the Operating Administrations' Associate Administrators for Administration.

[82 FR 19192, Apr. 26, 2017]
#### § 1110.1 Applicability.

This part contains general rulemaking procedures that apply to the issuance, amendment, and repeal of rules, general policy statement, or other interpretation of rules or law of the Surface Transportation Board, adopted under the procedures of section 553 of title 5 of the United States Code (the Administrative Procedure Act).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Bryan Baker, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|Date: March 17, 2008 |                                                                                                                
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | /s/J. BRYAN BAKERJ. Bryan Baker
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
98-96.

#### State ex rel. RMI Titanium Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD08-1043. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 546, 700 N.E.2d 1277. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.