```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.17 Roll No. 344]
[Pages 774-782]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.17                   [Roll No. 344]

                                AYES--56

     Becerra
     Bonior
     Brown (FL)
     Clay
     Clayton
     Clyburn
     Collins (IL)
     Collins (MI)
     Conyers
     Coyne
     DeFazio
     Dellums
     Dixon
     Engel
     Fattah
     Fields (LA)
     Filner
     Foglietta
     Ford
     Frank (MA)
     Gonzalez
     Green
     Hastings (FL)
     Hilliard
     Hinchey
     Jackson-Lee
     Johnson, E. B.
     Lewis (GA)
     Martinez
     McDermott
     McKinney
     Meek
     Mfume
     Miller (CA)
     Mink
     Nadler
     Oberstar
     Owens
     Payne (NJ)
     Rangel
     Reynolds
     Sabo
     Sanders
     Scott
     Serrano
     Stark
     Stokes
     Thompson
     Torres
     Tucker
     Velazquez
     Waters
     Watt (NC)
     Woolsey
     Wynn
     Yates

                                NOES--367

     Abercrombie
     Ackerman
     Allard
     Andrews
     Armey
     Bachus
     Baesler
     Baker (CA)
     Baker (LA)
     Baldacci
     Ballenger
     Barcia
     Barr
     Barrett (NE)
     Barrett (WI)
     Bartlett
     Barton
     Bass
     Bateman
     Beilenson
     Bentsen
     Bereuter
     Bevill
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bliley
     Blute
     Boehlert
     Boehner
     Bonilla
     Bono
     Borski
     Boucher
     Brewster
     Browder
     Brown (CA)
     Brown (OH)
     Brownback
     Bryant (TN)
     Bryant (TX)
     Bunn
     Bunning
     Burr
     Burton
     Buyer
     Callahan
     Calvert
     Camp
     Canady
     Cardin
     Castle
     Chabot
     Chambliss
     Chapman
     Chenoweth
     Christensen
     Chrysler
     Clement
     Clinger
     Coble
     Coburn
     Coleman
     Collins (GA)
     Combest
     Condit
     Cooley
     Costello
     Cox
     Cramer
     Crane
     Crapo
     Cremeans
     Cubin
     Cunningham
     Danner
     Davis
     de la Garza
     Deal
     DeLauro
     DeLay
     Deutsch
     Diaz-Balart
     Dickey
     Dicks
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Dooley
     Doolittle
     Dornan
     Doyle
     Dreier
     Duncan
     Dunn
     Durbin
     Edwards
     Ehlers
     Ehrlich
     Emerson
     English
     Ensign
     Eshoo
     Evans
     Everett
     Ewing
     Farr
     Fawell
     Fazio
     Fields (TX)
     Flanagan
     Foley
     Forbes
     Fowler
     Fox
     Franks (CT)
     Franks (NJ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Frisa
     Frost
     Funderburk
     Furse
     Gallegly
     Ganske
     Gejdenson
     Gekas
     Gephardt
     Geren
     Gibbons
     Gilchrest
     Gillmor
     Gilman
     Goodlatte
     Goodling
     Gordon
     Goss
     Graham
     Greenwood
     Gunderson
     Gutierrez
     Gutknecht
     Hall (OH)
     Hall (TX)
     Hamilton
     Hancock
     Hansen
     Harman
     Hastert
     Hastings (WA)
     Hayes
     Hayworth
     Hefley
     Hefner
     Heineman
     Herger
     Hilleary
     Hobson
     Hoekstra
     Hoke
     Holden
     Horn
     Hostettler
     Houghton
     Hoyer
     Hunter
     Hutchinson
     Hyde
     Inglis
     Istook
     Jacobs
     Jefferson
     Johnson (CT)
     Johnson (SD)
     Johnson, Sam
     Johnston
     Jones
     Kanjorski
     Kaptur
     Kasich
     Kelly
     Kennedy (MA)
     Kennedy (RI)
     Kennelly
     Kildee
     Kim
     King
     Kingston
     Klink
     Klug
     Knollenberg
     Kolbe
     LaFalce
     LaHood
     Lantos
     Largent
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Laughlin
     Lazio
     Leach
     Levin
     Lewis (CA)
     Lewis (KY)
     Lightfoot
     Lincoln
     Linder
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Lofgren
     Longley
     Lowey
     Lucas
     Luther
     Maloney
     Manton
     Manzullo
     Markey
     Martini
     Mascara
     Matsui
     McCarthy
     McCollum
     McCrery
     McDade
     McHale
     McHugh
     McInnis
     McIntosh
     McKeon
     Meehan
     Menendez
     Metcalf
     Meyers
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Mineta
     Minge
     Moakley
     Molinari
     Montgomery
     Moorhead
     Moran
     Morella
     Murtha
     Myers
     Myrick
     Neal
     Nethercutt
     Neumann
     Ney
     Norwood
     Nussle
     Obey
     Olver
     Ortiz
     Orton
     Oxley
     Packard
     Pallone
     Parker
     Pastor
     Paxon
     Payne (VA)
     Pelosi
     Peterson (FL)
     Peterson (MN)
     Petri
     Pickett
     Pombo
     Pomeroy
     Porter
     Portman
     Poshard
     Pryce
     Quillen
     Quinn
     Radanovich
     Rahall
     Ramstad
     Reed
     Regula
     Richardson
     Riggs
     Rivers
     Roberts
     Roemer
     Rogers
     Rohrabacher
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Rose
     Roth
     Roukema
     Roybal-Allard
     Royce
     Salmon
     Sanford
     Sawyer
     Saxton
     Scarborough
     Schaefer
     Schiff
     Schroeder
     Schumer
     Seastrand
     Sensenbrenner
     Shadegg
     Shaw
     Shays
     Shuster
     Sisisky
     Skaggs
     Skeen
     Skelton
     Slaughter
     Smith (MI)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Solomon
     Souder
     Spence
     Spratt
     Stearns
     Stenholm
     Stockman
     Studds
     Stump
     Stupak
     Talent
     Tanner
     Tate
     Tauzin
     Taylor (MS)
     Taylor (NC)
     Tejeda
     Thomas
     Thornberry
     Thornton
     Thurman
     Tiahrt
     Torkildsen
     Torricelli
     Traficant
     Upton
     Vento
     Visclosky
     Volkmer
     Vucanovich
     Waldholtz
     Walker
     Walsh
     Wamp
     Ward
     Watts (OK)
     Weldon (FL)
     Weldon (PA)
     Weller
     White
     Whitfield
     Wicker
     Williams
     Wilson
     Wise
     Wolf
     Wyden
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)
     Zeliff
     Zimmer

                         ANSWERED ``PRESENT''--1

       
     Bishop
       

                             NOT VOTING--10

     Archer
     Berman
     Flake
     Kleczka
     Livingston
     McNulty
     Mollohan
     Rush
     Towns
     Waxman
  So the amendment was not agreed to.
  The SPEAKER resumed the Chair.
  When Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Chairman, pursuant to House Resolution 149, 
reported the bill back to the House with an amendment adopted by the 
Committee.
  The previous question having been ordered by said resolution.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 149, the following amendment was 
considered as adopted:

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring),

     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 1996.

       The Congress determines and declares that this resolution 
     is the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
     1996, including

[[Page 775]]

     the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1997, 1998, 
     1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as required by section 301 of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the 
     fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 1996, 
     October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, October 1, 
     2000, and October 1, 2001:
       (1) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,057,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,058,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,099,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,138,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,189,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,247,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,316,600,000,000.
     and the amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be changed are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $14,987,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: -$24,393,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: -$34,772,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: -$48,354,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: -$58,836,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$69,275,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: -$71,859,000,000.
     and the amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act 
     revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels 
     of Federal revenues are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $103,815,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $108,986,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $114,877,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $120,698,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $126,893,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $133,590,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $140,425,000,000.
       (2) The appropriate levels of total new budget authority 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,285,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,321,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,355,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,388,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,421,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,436,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,459,800,000,000.
       (3) The appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,287,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,313,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,326,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,363,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,400,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,414,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,437,300,000,000.
       (4) The amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: -$229,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: -$255,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: -$227,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: -$224,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: -$211,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$167,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: -$120,700,000,000.
       (5) The appropriate levels of the public debt are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $5,195,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,516,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,809,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $6,099,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,374,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,614,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,806,100,000,000.
       (6) The appropriate levels of total Federal credit activity 
     for the fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1, 
     1996, October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999, 
     October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2001 are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $37,600,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $193,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $40,200,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $187,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $42,300,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $185,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $45,700,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $183,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $45,800,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $184,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $45,800,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $186,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New direct loan obligations, $46,100,000,000.
       (B) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $187,600,000,000.

     SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, new primary loan guarantee commitments, and 
     new secondary loan guarantee commitments for fiscal years 
     1996 through 2002 for each major functional category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $267,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $265,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $269,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $265,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $277,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $265,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $281,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $271,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $287,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $279,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $287,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $279,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $287,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $279,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.

[[Page 776]]

       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $4,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,600,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$4,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$3,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.

[[Page 777]]

       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $42,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $37,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $34,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $34,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $52,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $13,600,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $46,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,300,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,900,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $44,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $19,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,200,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $44,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $14,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $45,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,000,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $44,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,800,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $43,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $121,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $122,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $127,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $127,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $132,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $132,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $136,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $136,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $141,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $141,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $146,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $146,200,000,000.

[[Page 778]]

       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $149,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $148,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $177,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $175,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $186,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $185,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $195,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $194,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $206,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $203,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $214,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $212,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $224,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $222,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $234,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $232,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $222,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $225,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $231,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $235,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $248,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $243,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $255,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $254,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $265,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $267,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $269,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $277,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $279,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $100,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $26,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $21,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,700,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,300,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $41,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,900,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $41,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $20,600,000,000.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,600,000,000.

[[Page 779]]

       (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $295,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $295,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $304,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $304,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $308,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $308,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $314,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $314,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $319,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $319,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $320,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $320,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $322,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $322,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$1,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$2,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$34,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$34,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$34,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$34,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$37,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$37,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $36,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$38,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$38,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$37,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$37,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$39,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$39,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (E) New secondary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

[[Page 780]]

     SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

       (a)(1) Not later than July 14, 1995, the House committees 
     named in paragraphs (1) through (12) of subsection (b) of 
     this section shall submit their recommendations to the House 
     Committee on the Budget. After receiving those 
     recommendations, the House Committee on the Budget shall 
     report to the House a reconciliation bill carrying out all 
     such recommendations without any substantive revision.
       (2) Each committee named in paragraphs (1) through (11) of 
     subsection (b) shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending such that the total 
     level of direct spending for that committee for--
       (A) fiscal year 1996,
       (B) the 5-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2000, and
       (C) the 7-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2002,
     does not exceed the total level of direct spending in that 
     period in the paragraph applicable to that committee.
       (3) Each committee named in paragraphs (2)(B), (4)(B), 
     (5)(B), and (6)(B) of subsection (b) shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction as set forth in the paragraph 
     applicable to that committee.
       (4) The Committee on Ways and Means shall carry out 
     subsection (b)(12).
       (b)(1) The House Committee on Agriculture: $35,824,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $171,886,000,000 in outlays 
     in fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $263,102,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (2)(A) The House Committee on Banking and Financial 
     Services: -$12,897,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     -$43,065,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and -$57,184,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (B) The House Committee on Banking and Financial Services 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     would reduce the deficit by: $0 in fiscal year 1996, 
     -$100,000,000 in fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 
     -$260,000,000 in fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (3) The House Committee on Commerce: $293,665,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $1,726,600,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $2,625,094,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (4)(A) The House Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities: $13,727,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     1996, $61,570,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $95,520,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (B) In addition to changes in law reported pursuant to 
     subparagraph (A), the House Committee on Economic and 
     Educational Opportunities shall report program changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that would result in a reduction 
     in outlays as follows: -$720,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     -$5,908,000,000 in fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 
     -$9,018,000,000 in fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (5)(A) The House Committee on Government Reform and 
     Oversight: $57,725,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $313,647,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $455,328,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (B) In addition to changes in law reported pursuant to 
     subparagraph (A), the House Committee on Government Reform 
     and Oversight shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that would reduce the deficit by: -$988,000,000 
     in fiscal year 1996, -$9,618,000,000 in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2000, and -$14,740,000,000 in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (6)(A) The House Committee on International Relations: 
     $14,246,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $62,076,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 2000, 
     and $83,206,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2002.
       (B) In addition to changes in law reported pursuant to 
     subparagraph (A), the House Committee on International 
     Relations shall shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that would reduce the deficit by: 
     -$19,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, -$95,000,000,000 in 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and -$123,000,000 in fiscal 
     years 1996 through 2002.
       (7) The House Committee on the Judiciary: $2,580,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $14,043,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $20,029,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (8) The House Committee on National Security: 
     $38,769,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $224,682,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $328,334,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (9) The House Committee on Resources: $1,558,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal year 1996, $6,532,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $12,512,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (10) The House Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure: $16,636,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 
     1996, $83,227,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $117,079,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (11) The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs: 
     $19,041,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $105,965,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $154,054,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (12)(A) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending such that the total level of direct spending for 
     that committee for--
       (i) fiscal year 1996,
       (ii) the 5-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2000, and
       (iii) the 7-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2002,

     does not exceed the following level in that period: 
     $356,336,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $2,152,905,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $3,297,787,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (B) In addition to changes in law reported pursuant to 
     subparagraph (A), the House Committee on Ways and Means shall 
     report changes in laws within its jurisdiction such that the 
     total level of revenues for that committee for--
       (i) fiscal year 1996,
       (ii) the 5-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2000, and

       (iii) the 7-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2002,
     is not less than the following amount in that period: 
     $1,027,612,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $5,371,087,000,000 in 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $7,836,405,000,000 in 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (c)(1) Not later than September 14, 1995, the House 
     committees named in paragraphs (2) and (3) shall submit their 
     recommendations to the House Committee on the Budget. After 
     receiving those recommendations, the House Budget Committee 
     shall report to the House a reconciliation bill carrying out 
     all such recommendations without any substantive revisions.
       (2) In addition to changes in laws reported pursuant to 
     subsection (b)(3), the House Committee on Commerce shall 
     report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 
     direct spending such that the total level of direct spending 
     for that committee for--
       (A) fiscal year 1996,
       (B) the 5-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2000, and
       (C) the 7-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2002,

     does not exceed the following level in that period: 
     $287,165,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $1,592,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $2,338,694,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (3) In addition to changes in laws reported pursuant to 
     subsection (b)(12), the House Committee on Ways and Means 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending such that the total level of direct 
     spending for that committee for--
       (A) fiscal year 1996,
       (B) the 5-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2000, and
       (C) the 7-year period beginning with fiscal year 1996 and 
     ending with fiscal year 2002,

     does not exceed the following level in that period: 
     $349,836,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, 
     $2,018,505,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $3,009,387,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (d) For purposes of this section, the term ``direct 
     spending'' has the meaning given to such term in section 
     250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
     Control Act of 1985.

     SEC. 5. AGRICULTURAL SAVINGS.

       Congress shall re-examine budget reductions for 
     agricultural programs in the United States Department of 
     Agriculture for fiscal years 1999 and 2000 unless the 
     following conditions are met--
       (1) land values on agricultural land on January 1, 1998, 
     are at least 95 percent of the same values on the date of 
     adoption of this resolution;
       (2) there is enacted into law regulatory relief for the 
     agricultural sector in the areas of wetlands regulation, the 
     Endangered Species Act, private property rights and cost-
     benefit analyses of proposed regulations;
       (3) there is tax relief for producers in the form of 
     capital gains tax reduction, increased estate tax exemptions 
     and mechanisms to average tax loads over strong and weak 
     income years; and
       (4) there is no government interference in the 
     international market in the form of agricultural trade 
     embargoes in effect and there is successful implementation 
     and enforcement of trade agreements,

     including the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 
     and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to lower 
     export subsidies and reduce import barriers to trade imposed 
     by foreign governments.

     SEC. 6. SALE OF GOVERNMENT ASSETS.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress 
     that--
       (1) the prohibition on scoring asset sales has discouraged 
     the sale of assets that can be better managed by the private 
     sector and generate receipts to reduce the Federal budget 
     deficit;
       (2) the President's fiscal year 1996 budget included 
     $8,000,000,000 in receipts from asset sales and proposed a 
     change in the asset sale scoring rule to allow the proceeds 
     from these sales to be scored;
       (3) assets should not be sold if such sale would increase 
     the budget deficit over the long run; and
       (4) the asset sale scoring prohibition should be repealed 
     and consideration should be given to replacing it with a 
     methodology that takes into account the long-term budgetary 
     impact of asset sale.
       (b) Budgetary Treatment.--For purposes of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974, the

[[Page 781]]

     amounts realized from sales of assets shall be scored with 
     respect to the level of budget authority, outlays, or 
     revenues.
       (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``sale of an asset'' shall have the same meaning as under 
     section 250(c)(21) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985.
       (d) Treatment of Loan Assets.--For purposes of this 
     section, the sale of loan assets or the prepayment of a loan 
     shall be governed by the terms of the Federal Credit Reform 
     Act of 1990.

     SEC. 7. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE.

       (a) Adjustments.--(1) For purposes of points of order under 
     the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and concurrent 
     resolutions on the budget--
       (A) the discretionary spending limits under section 
     601(a)(2) of that Act (and those limits as cumulatively 
     adjusted) for the current fiscal year and each outyear;
       (B) the allocations to the Committee on Appropriations 
     under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of that Act; and
       (C) the appropriate budgetary aggregates in the most 
     recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget,

     shall be adjusted to reflect the amounts of additional new 
     budget authority or additional outlays (as defined in 
     paragraph (2)) reported by the Committee on Appropriations in 
     appropriation Acts (or by the committee of conference on such 
     legislation) for the Internal Revenue Service compliance 
     initiative activities in any fiscal year, but not to exceed 
     in any fiscal year $405,000,000 in new budget authority and 
     $405,000,000 in outlays.
       (2) As used in this section, the terms ``additional new 
     budget authority'' or ``additional outlays'' shall mean, for 
     any fiscal year, budget authority or outlays (as the case may 
     be) in excess of the amounts requested for that fiscal year 
     for the Internal Revenue Service in the President's Budget 
     for fiscal year 1996.
       (b) Revised Limits, Allocations, and Aggregates.--Upon the 
     reporting of legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and 
     again upon the submission of a conference report on such 
     legislation (if a conference report is submitted), the 
     chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate or the 
     House of Representatives (as the case may be) shall submit to 
     that chairman's respective House appropriately revised--
       (1) discretionary spending limits under section 601(a)(2) 
     of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (and those limits as 
     cumulatively adjusted) for the current fiscal year and each 
     outyear;
       (2) allocations to the Committee on Appropriations under 
     sections 302(a) and 602(a) of that Act; and
       (3) appropriate budgetary aggregates in the most recently 
     agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget,

     to carry out this subsection. These revised discretionary 
     spending limits, allocations, and aggregates shall be 
     considered for purposes of congressional enforcement under 
     that Act as the discretionary spending limits, allocations, 
     and aggregates.
       (c) Reporting Revised Suballocations.--The Committees on 
     Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
     may report appropriately revised suballocations pursuant to 
     sections 302(b)(1) and 602(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget 
     Act of 1974 to carry out this section.
       (d) Contingencies.--
       (1) The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the 
     Treasury have certified that they are firmly committed to the 
     principles of privacy, confidentiality, courtesy, and 
     protection of taxpayer rights. To this end, the Internal 
     Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury have 
     explicitly committed to initiate and implement educational 
     programs for any new employees hired as a result of the 
     compliance initiative made possible by this section.
       (2) This section shall not apply to any additional new 
     budget authority or additional outlays unless--
       (A) the chairmen of the Budget Committees certify, based 
     upon information from the Congressional Budget Office, the 
     General Accounting Office, and the Internal Revenue Service 
     (as well as from any other sources they deem relevant), that 
     such budget authority or outlays will not increase the total 
     of the Federal budget deficits over the next five years; and
       (B) any funds made available pursuant to such budget 
     authority or outlays are available only for the purpose of 
     carrying out Internal Revenue Service compliance initiative 
     activities.

     SEC. 8. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS ON BASELINES.

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that:
       (1) Baselines are projections of future spending if 
     existing policies remain unchanged.
       (2) Under baseline assumptions, spending automatically 
     rises with inflation even if such increases are not provided 
     under current law.
       (3) Baseline budgeting is inherently biased against 
     policies that would reduce the projected growth in spending 
     because such policies are scored as a reduction from a rising 
     baseline.
       (4) The baseline concept has encouraged Congress to 
     abdicate its constitutional responsibility to control the 
     public purse for programs which are automatically funded 
     under existing law.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress 
     that baseline budgeting should be replaced with a form of 
     budgeting that requires full justification and analysis of 
     budget proposals and maximizes congressional accountability 
     for public spending.

     SEC. 9. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON EMERGENCIES.

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that:
       (1) The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 exempted from the 
     discretionary spending limits and the Pay-As-You-Go 
     requirements for entitlement and tax legislation funding 
     requirements that are designated by Congress and the 
     President as an emergency.
       (2) Congress and the President have increasingly misused 
     the emergency designation by--
       (A) designating funding as an emergency that is neither 
     unforeseen nor a genuine emergency, and
       (B) circumventing spending limits or passing controversial 
     items that would not pass scrutiny in a free-standing bill.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     Congress should study alternative approaches to budgeting for 
     emergencies, including codifying the definition of an 
     emergency and establishing contingency funds to pay for 
     emergencies.

     SEC. 10. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING PRIVATIZATION OF THE 
                   STUDENT LOAN MARKETING ASSOCIATION (SALLIE 
                   MAE).

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that:
       (1) The Student Loan Marketing Association was established 
     in 1972 as a government-sponsored corporation dedicated to 
     ensuring adequate private sector funding for federally 
     guaranteed education loans.
       (2) Since 1972, student loan volume has grown from 
     $1,000,000,000 a year to $25,000,000,000 a year. The Student 
     Loan Marketing Association was instrumental in fostering this 
     expansion of the student loan program.
       (3) With securitization and 42 secondary markets, there 
     currently exist numerous alternatives for lenders wishing to 
     sell or liquidate their portfolios of student loans.
       (4) Maintaining Student Loan Marketing Association as a 
     Government-sponsored enterprise exposes taxpayers to an 
     unnecessary liability.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense Congress that the 
     Student Loan Marketing Association should be restructured as 
     a private corporation.

     SEC. 11. SENSE OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING DEBT 
                   REPAYMENT.

       It is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
       (1) the Congress has a basic moral and ethical 
     responsibility to future generations to repay the Federal 
     debt;
       (2) the Congress should enact a plan that balances the 
     budget, and then also develops a regimen for paying off the 
     Federal debt;
       (3) after the budget is balanced, a surplus should be 
     created, which can be used to begin paying off the debt; and
       (4) such a plan should be formulated and implemented so 
     that this generation can save future generations from the 
     crushing burdens of the Federal debt.

     SEC. 12. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING REPEAL OF HOUSE RULE 
                   XLIX AND THE LEGAL LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC DEBT.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) rule XLIX of the Rules of House of Representatives 
     (popularly known as the Gephardt rule) should be repealed;
       (2) the fiscal year 1996 reconciliation bill should be 
     enacted into law before passage of the debt limit extension; 
     and
       (3) the debt limit should only be set at levels, and for 
     durations, that help assure a balanced budget by fiscal year 
     2002 or sooner.

     SEC. 13. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE BUDGETARY TREATMENT 
                   OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FOR DIRECT LOANS.

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that the Federal Credit 
     Reform Act of 1990 understates the cost to the Government of 
     direct loans because administrative costs are not included in 
     the net present value calculation of Federal direct loan 
     subsidy costs.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress 
     that the cost of a direct loan should be the net present 
     value, at the time the direct loan is disbursed, of the 
     following cash flows for the estimated life of the loan:
       (1) Loan disbursement.
       (2) Repayments of principal.
       (3) Interest costs and other payments by or to the 
     Government over the life of the loan after adjusting for 
     estimated defaults, prepayments, fees, penalties, and other 
     recoveries.
       (4) In the case of a direct loan made pursuant to a program 
     for which the Congressional Budget Office estimates that for 
     the coming fiscal year (or any prior fiscal year) loan 
     commitments will equal or exceed $5,000,000,000, direct 
     expenses, including expenses arising from--
       (A) activities related to credit extension, loan 
     origination, and loan servicing;
       (B) payments to contractors, other Government entities, and 
     program participants;
       (C) management of contractors;
       (D) collection of delinquents loans; and
       (E) write-off and close-out of loans.

     SEC. 14. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING COMMISSION ON THE 
                   SOLVENCY OF THE FEDERAL MILITARY AND CIVIL 
                   SERVICE RETIREMENT FUNDS.

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that the Federal 
     retirement system, for both military and civil service 
     retirees, currently has liabilities of $1.1 trillion, while 
     holding assets worth $340 billion and anticipating employee 
     contributions of $220 billion, which leaves an unfunded 
     liability of $540 billion.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress 
     that a high-level commission

[[Page 782]]

     should be convened to study the problems associated with the 
     Federal retirement system and make recommendations that will 
     ensure the long-term solvency of the military and civil 
     service retirement funds.

  The question being put,
  Will the House agree to said concurrent resolution, as amended?
  The SPEAKER announced that pursuant to clause 7 of rule XV the yeas 
and nays were ordered, and the call was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

238

affirmative

Nays

193
```