alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED : JUN E10 , 201 1 ••-•iTMEMTO F U.S . DEPARIMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N- ORTATlO i J OFFIC EO FHEARING S ; WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F AI RZFLYIN GSERVICE , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CPIOSWOOI O (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-097 4

ORDE RREASSIGNIN GPROCEEDIN G I nth e interes t

o f judicia l efficiency , th e above-captione dproceedin g i s reassigne dfro m Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e Ronni e A . Yode r t o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o nth e attache dServic e List . S O ORDERED .

li e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e l(aw/Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No , CPIOSWOOIO (Civi l Penalt y Action ) 

### CORRECTEJ) JIKMC E

### LIS T ORIGINAL;«ip ^ COP Y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio nv ^ ^5* ; 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 .; ? < Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-t0Ol'« A Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2WIOG6 *

ONEC^ ^ Laurenc e E . Rohl , Respondent' s Representativ e President/Directo r

of Operations , w ; ^ ' ; Ai r ZFlyin g Service , Inc. , Responden t 35 5 Richmon dRd. , Hangar 5 Richmon dHeights , O H 4414 3 TEL : 216-261-299 2 FAX : 216-261-299 3 Nichola s R . Milliard , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 ^ . i Offic e o f th e Chie f

Counse l Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-345 2 FAX : 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e • .;;;? ; U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio ni . ; Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso nptjjiy i Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, $Ml,'^

^ D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-^30 . 1 courier , use th e followin g address : Federa

l it t Building—^uit

e 2W1000, Washington, 

### - 2 -
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 9, 1995 (77), Para 77.2 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 888]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.77.2  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RADANOVICH, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Thursday, June 8, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
§ 71.75-15 Posting of Convention certificates. ( a ) The certificates described in this subpart, or certified copies thereof, when issued to a vessel shall be posted in a prominent and accessible place on the vessel.
( b ) The certificate shall be carried in a manner similar to that described in § 71.01-5 for a certificate of inspection.
#### § 1151.1 Scope.

This part governs applications filed under 49 U.S.C. 10907. The Board can require the sale of a rail line to a financially responsible person. A rail line is eligible for a forced sale if it appears in category 1 or 2 of the owning railroad's system diagram map (but the railroad has not filed an application to abandon the line), or the public convenience and necessity, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 10907(c)(1), permit or require the sale of the line.

[48 FR 9654, Mar. 8, 1983, as amended at 56 FR 37861, Aug. 9, 1991; 64 FR 53268, Oct. 1, 1999]
#### John McEnroe, *Respondent, v.*John White, *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion

*Per Guriam.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS















                                       4
<PAGE>   2




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



   The Board of Directors
   Skaneateles Bancorp, Inc.:


   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos.
   33-37281, 33-37282, 33-92198, 333-20445 and 333-52925 on Form S-8 and
   333-18287 on Form S-3 of Skaneateles Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated
   January 8, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Skaneateles
   Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
   related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and
   comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
   period ended December 31, 1998, which report has been incorporated by
   reference in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Skaneateles
   Bancorp, Inc..


         /s/ KPMG LLP


   Syracuse, New York
   March 23, 1999
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending October 16, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
###### Editorial Note on Part 110

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 110.7 Control number under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Office of Management and Budget control number assigned for the collection of information in § 110.30 is 2137-0586.

[87 FR 79765, Dec. 27, 2022]
§ 4.40-35 Records of the Coast Guard and the Board. ( a ) Records of the Coast Guard made under § 4.40-30 are available to the public under 49 CFR part 7.
( b ) Records of the Board made under §§ 4.40-20 and 4.40-30 are available to the public under 49 CFR part 801.
Exhibit 3.4

                        Amendment of Articles: Change to
        No Par: Innovest Capital Sources Corporation September 25, 1997




<PAGE>


                                                                      FILED COPY
STOCK CHANGE

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      Innovest Capital Sources Corporation

                                                                     [STAMP]
                                                                 19971153492 M
                                                                      $25.00
                                                              SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                              09-25-97  11:59:16


     Pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  the  Colorado   Corporation   Code,  the
undersigned  corporation  adopts the  following  Articles  of  Amendment  to its
Articles of Incorporation:

     First: The name of the Corporation is Innovest Capital Sources Corporation

     Second: The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was
adopted on July 11, 1995 as prescribed by the Colorado Corporation Code, in the
following manner:

[x] Such Amendment was adopted by vote of the shareholders. The number of shares
voted for the amendment was sufficient for approval.

          The Common Stock of the Corporation shall have a par value of No Par.

     Third: In all other respects, the Articles as originally filed remain in
full force and effect as stated.

     We, the undersigned, being the President and Secretary of this Corporation
do make and file these Articles of Amendment, for the purpose of Amending the
Articles of Incorporation as originally filed pursuant to the Colorado
Corporation Code, and accordingly have set our hand hereunto this day in
certification thereof: August 31, 1997.



/s/ Miller L. Mays                               /s/ Karl E. Rodriguez
-------------------------------                  -------------------------------
Miller L. Mays, III                                  Karl E. Rodriguez
PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR                              SECRETARY/TREASURER, DIRECTOR
#### § 11.121 [Reserved]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending November 26, 2011

----

Advisory Councils            Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council -- announcement of members and designation of Howard Boyle as president and Peter Humphrey as vice president for 2012.            -Announced, November 21, 2011            Bank Holding Companies            Green Dot Corporation, Monrovia, California -- to acquire Bonneville Bancorp, Provo, Utah, and thereby acquire its subsidiary bank, Bonneville Bank; and elections by Green Dot and Bonneville Bancorp to become financial holding companies.            -Approved, November 22, 2011            Enforcement            Mountain National Bancshares, Inc., Sevierville, Tennessee -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, November 22, 2011                        Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Franklin, Tennessee -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, November 22, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### Hannah Lazear, *Appellant, v.*Martha Ann Sly, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2474 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2474

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that in the case of 
 an individual entitled to educational assistance under the Post-9/11 
  Educational Assistance program who is enrolled at an institution of 
  higher education in a State in which the public institutions charge 
 only fees in lieu of tuition, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
 allow the individual to use all or any portion of the amounts payable 
  for the established charges for the program of education to pay any 
    amount of the individual's tuition or fees for that program of 
                               education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

 Mr. McKeon (for himself, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Hunter, Mr. McClintock, Mr. 
  Lewis of California, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Herger, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
     Calvert, Mr. Royce, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of 
   California, Mrs. Bono Mack, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. 
Bilbray, Mr. Issa, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Campbell, Mr. McCarthy of California, 
 and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that in the case of 
 an individual entitled to educational assistance under the Post-9/11 
  Educational Assistance program who is enrolled at an institution of 
  higher education in a State in which the public institutions charge 
 only fees in lieu of tuition, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
 allow the individual to use all or any portion of the amounts payable 
  for the established charges for the program of education to pay any 
    amount of the individual's tuition or fees for that program of 
                               education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Educational Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF ENTITLEMENT UNDER POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAM TO PAY ANY AMOUNT OF TUITION AND FEES.

    Subsection (a) of section 3313 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``In the case 
of such an individual who is pursuing such a program of education at an 
institution of higher education in a State in which the public 
institutions charge only fees in lieu of tuition, the Secretary shall 
allow the individual to use all or any portion of the amounts payable 
under subsection (c)(1)(A) to pay any amount of the individual's 
tuition or fees for that program of education.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7099

PETE SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREENSBORO CHIEF OF POLICE, DAUGHTRY; S.

LANGHOLE, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-96-459-2)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: Occtober 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the

magistrate judge's order and dismissing without prejudice Appellant's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court's

dismissal without prejudice is not appealable at this time, given

the fact that Appellant could save his complaint through amendment.

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064

(4th Cir. 1993). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: Bahner, Mark A.

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 1:31 PM

To: Putney.David@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: Green, David A. Subject: ICR responses PM analysis

Hi David,

Attached is a PM analysis workbook, based on responses to the PAL ICR. It does not have some plants (e.g., Ormet) because there hasn’t been time to get all the data entered. The workbook contains a summary table, as well as the detailed data.

From the summary table, it seems clear that there is no way to easily establish a MACT floor for PM, based on the responses. The responses have many pieces of data that appear simply wrong:

1 ) Rio Tinto Alcan claims 100 percent collection efficiency for their bake furnace control, and 95%

fo r their potlines; I think this is almost certainly an attempt to say that the collection system for
the bake furnace delivers 100 percent of the emissions to the control system, and the potline
hoods transfer 95% of the emissions from the pots to the contr ol systems rather than claims
regarding the control device removal efficiency.

2 ) Alcoa, Rockdale has a concentration of 648 mg/dscf, which is far higher than anyone else, and is
simply not believable (there would be tremendous visible emissions from such a s ource).

3 ) Alcoa Massena East has a concentration of 0.0006 mg/dscf, which is much lower than anyone

else. It is potentially believable, but would definitely need further investigation.

In addition to those issues, there is the problem that none of the plant s (except Alcoa

- Intalco Ferndale) report PM emissions from the roof vents (because those weren’t asked for in the ICR). Alcoa

- Intalco reports them because they control their emissions from the roof vents with a wet scrubber (which has a claimed particulate efficiency of 80 percent.

Finally, presumably we would want to have a MACT value in terms of lb/ton of aluminum. Therefore, the concentrations would need to be converted into lb/ton of aluminum in order to be used. Since each plant may have many potline primary control devices with varying flow rates, this effort would take some time (i.e., it almost certainly couldn’t be completed today).

Best wishes,

Mark

Mark A. Bahner
RTI, International P.O. Box 12194, 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Par k, NC 27709

- 2194



### Phone: (919) 541

- 6016

Fax: (919) 541

- 7155

Email: bahner@rti.org

Internet: http://www.rti.org
J~~~ ED STqT

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

+1_14 PROjfO _ 

JUL 2 3 2013 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

This is in response to your July 22, 2013, request for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) draft recertification memo to the 

Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterizing transuranic (TRU) waste at Hanford. Your request 

is in accordance with the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that 

DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals 

for waste characterization activities at DOE TRU waste generator sites. 

Since September 2011, the contact-handled (CH) TRU waste characterization program implemented by 

Hanford-CCP has been suspended due to funding issues. Once funding limitations have been resolved 

and waste characterization activities resume, CBFO plans to conduct a recertification audit as a basis for 

reinstating authority to perform waste characterization activities and continue shipments from HanfordCCP. EPA will also conduct an inspection to confirm that Hanford-CCP can adequately implement the 

CH TRU waste characterization program which EPA approved on December 21, 2010 (see A-98-49; IIA4-138 in the EPA Air pocket). Between December 2010 and September 2011, EPA has also received 

and reviewed Hanford-CCP's quarterly tiering reports covering Tier 2 changes to the waste 

characterization program and found all changes made to be acceptable. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for HanfordCCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at 

(202) 343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Rajani Joglekar 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Internet Address (URL) - http /lwww.epa gov 

RecycledlRecyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Site Documents
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA 2007-28010, Airspace Docket No. 07-ANE-91]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

 Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule that establishes a Class E airspace area at Dean Memorial Airport, Haverhill, NH (K5B9) to provide for adequate controlled airspace for those aircraft using the new Area Navigation (RNAV) Instrument Approach Procedure to the Airport.

# DATES:

Effective 0901 UTC, July 5, 2007. The Director of the   Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA  Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark D. Ward, Manager, System Support, AJO2-E2, FAA Eastern Service Center, 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404) 305-5570; fax (404) 305-5099.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Confirmation of Effective Date

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 8, 2007 (72 FR 25964). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on July 5, 2007. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in College Park, GA on June 7, 2007.

Mark D. Ward,

Group Manager, System Support Group, AJO2-E2 Eastern Service Center.

[FR Doc. 07-3202 Filed 07-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### § 1106.5 Waiver.

The SIP requirements established by this part may be waived or modified by the Board where a railroad shows that relief is warranted or appropriate.