alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                                        

Our report dated Janaury 27, 1998 on this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Capital 
Re Corporation is included in Item 8.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of Capital Re
Corporation listed in Item 14(a).  These schedules are the responsibility of the
Corporation's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, present fairly in all material respects  the information set forth
therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form   S-8 No. 33-47723) pertaining to the Capital Re Corporation 1992 Stock
Option Plan, in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-73122) pertaining to the
Capital Re Corporation Directors' Stock Option Plan and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-37353) pertaining to the Capital Re Corporation 1997
Employee Stock Option Plan, the Capital Re Corporation Performance Share Plan
and the Capital Re Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Covered Executive
Officers of our report dated January 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with
respect to the financial statement schedules included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Capital Re Corporation.

                                    
                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
March  25, 1998
#### David J. Garth, *Appellant, v.*Eymer Cappelman, *Respondent.*

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 27, 2011

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|EDON BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | Edon Bancorp, Inc., Edon, OH to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of the Edon State Bank Company of Edon, Edon, OH, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/23/2011
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 09/23/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, June 26, 1995 (86), Para 86.6 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 1041]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.86.6  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. STUMP: Committee on Veterans' Affairs. H.R. 1565. A 
     bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to extend through 
     December 31, 1997, the period during which the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs is authorized to provide priority health 
     care to certain veterans exposed to Agent Orange, ionizing 
     radiation, or environmental hazards; with an amendment (Rept. 
     No. 104-158). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on 
     the State of the Union.
       Mr. KASICH: Committee of Conference. Conference report on 
     House Concurrent Resolution 67. Resolution setting forth the 
     congressional budget for the U.S. Government for fiscal years 
     1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 (Rept. No. 104-
     159). Ordered to be printed.
```
§ 97.40-15 Load line marks. ( a ) Vessels assigned a load line shall have the deck line and the load line marks permanently scribed or embossed as required by subchapter E (Load Lines) of this chapter.
§ 1115.2 Initial decisions. This category includes the initial decision of an administrative law judge, individual Board Member, or employee board. ( a ) An appeal of right is permitted.
( b ) Appeals must be based on one or more of the following grounds: ( 1 ) That a necessary finding of fact is omitted, erroneous, or unsupported by substantial evidence of record;
( 2 ) That a necessary legal conclusion, or finding is contrary to law, Board precedent, or policy;
( 3 ) That an important question of law, policy, or discretion is involved which is without governing precedent; or
( 4 ) That prejudicial procedural error has occurred.
( c ) Appeals must detail the assailed findings with supporting citations to the record and authorities.
( d ) Appeals and replies shall not exceed 30 pages in length, including argument, and appendices or other attachments, but excluding a table of cases and an index of subject matter.
( e ) Appeals must be filed within 20 days after the service date of the decision or within any further period (not to exceed 20 days) the Board may authorize. Replies must be filed within 20 days of the date the appeal is filed.
( f ) The timely filing of an appeal to an initial decision will stay the effect of the action pending determination of the appeal.
( g ) If an appeal of an initial decision is not timely filed or the Board does not stay the effectiveness on its own motion, the order set forth in the initial decision shall become the action of the Board and be effective at the expiration of the time for filing, unless otherwise provided.
[47 FR 49568, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 19894, May 9, 1989; 61 FR 52714, Oct. 8, 1996; 81 FR 8855, Feb. 23, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,011,091
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,011,091
<CASH>                                          18,878
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,116,816
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         135,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,387,954
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 37,900
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            402,145
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 99,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                     568,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,387,954
<PREMIUMS>                                     133,664
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             56,616
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               8,037
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,548
<BENEFITS>                                      27,357
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     42,887
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            15,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.31
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  17,759
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             25,508
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                1,849
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               4,574
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 9,898
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 30,644
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not applicable for mortgage guaranty and specialty reinsurer.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 70.01-1 Purpose of regulations.

The purpose of the regulations in this subchapter is to set forth uniform minimum requirements for passenger vessels. The regulations are necessary to carry out the provisions of law affecting passenger vessels and such regulations have the force of law. The regulations in this subchapter (parts 70, 71, 72, 76, 77, 78, and 80) have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16890, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51203, Sept. 30, 1997, USCG-2012-0196; 81 FR 48251, July 22, 2016]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
                                                                     ----------


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report, dated
February 27, 1998, on the consolidated financial statements of Capital
Directions, Inc. which appears on page 10 of Capital Directions, Inc.'s 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in Capital
Directions, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997, in the registration statement on Form S-8 for the Capital Directions,
Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan.

                                   /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                       Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 26, 1998
#### § 1242.36 Machinery repair and equipment damaged (accounts XX-26-40 and XX-26-48).

Separate common expenses according to separation of common expenses in repair and maintenance (account XX-26-41).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report").

     I, Patinda Lei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Patinda Lei
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Patinda Lei
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., and will be retained by Nam Tai
Electronics, Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.37 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 381]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.37  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. ROBERTS: Committee on Agriculture. H.R. 1135. A bill to 
     improve the commodity distribution programs of the Department 
     of Agriculture, to reform and simplify the Food Stamp 
     Program, and for other purposes; with an amendment (Rept. No. 
     104-77). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
       Mr. DREIER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 115. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
     additional disaster assistance and making rescissions for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes 
     (Rept. No. 104-78). Referred to the House Calendar.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1598

To establish a definition of ‘‘made in America or the equivalent thereof’’

for purposes of Federal law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 1995

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To establish a definition of ‘‘made in America or the

equivalent thereof’’ for purposes of Federal law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Made in America Clari5 fication Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. BUY AMERICAN.

7 For purposes of title III of the Act of March 3, 1933

8 (commonly known as the ‘‘Buy American Act’’) (41 U.S.C.

9 10a–10d), any other Federal law or regulation which gov10 erns the acquisition of products for the Federal Govern-
2

•HR 1598 IH

1 ment, or for any Federal law or regulation which pre2 scribes a standard for labeling of products as being made

3 in America or an equivalent standard, the term ‘‘made in

4 America or the equivalent thereof’’ means—

5 (1) an unmanufactured end product mined or

6 produced in the United States; or

7 (2) an end product manufactured in the United

8 States if the value of its components mined, pro9 duced, or manufactured in the United States equals

10 65 percent or more of the total value of all of its

11 components.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JOAN THOMPSON 

 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 15-11167 

 DISTRICT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

v. MAGISTRATE ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 

CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES et. al., 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________/ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

You are hereby notified to appear in the above captioned matter for the scheduled 

Settlement Conference, before the Honorable Anthony P. Patti on following date and time. 

DATE TIME LOCATION 

October 4, 2016 10:00 AM 

Chambers 629 

231 W. Lafayette Blvd. 

Detroit, MI 48226 

All parties with settlement authority are required to be present. 

Parties are instructed and required to comply with the undersigned judicial officer’s 

Practice Guidelines for Settlement Conferences, which are available at 

http://www.mied.uscourts.gov. Submission of Settlement Statements that do not 

comply with practice guidelines will be rejected accordingly. 

 

 

Dated: August 24, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on August 

24, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 

s/ Michael Williams 

 Case Manager to the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti
#### § 1.48 Office of the Chief Information Officer.

The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the principal information technology (IT), cyber security, privacy, and records management advisor to the Secretary, and is the final authority on these matters within the Department. The Office of the CIO supports the Organizational Excellence Strategic Goal by providing leadership on all matters associated with the Department's IT portfolio. The CIO participates with each Administrator in the hiring decisions and performance reviews of the Operating Administrations' CIOs.

[82 FR 19193, Apr. 26, 2017]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 28, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 021 4 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 152 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
 Dated: July 28, 2005/s/ Michael C. Mayer
    
    /s/ Linda J. MilesMichael C. Mayer
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
 32