alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.408 Tank overflow control. ( a ) When table 1 references this section, a cargo containment system must have a cargo high level alarm meeting § 153.409 and one of the following additional systems: ( 1 ) A second high level (cargo overflow) alarm.
( 2 ) A system that automatically stops cargo flow to the tank (automatic shutdown system).
( b ) The high level alarm and the cargo overflow alarm or automatic shutdown system must: ( 1 ) Be independent of one-another; and
( 2 ) Operate on loss of power.
( c ) The cargo overflow alarm or the automatic shutdown system must operate early enough to: ( 1 ) Stop the loading operation before the cargo tank overflows; and
( 2 ) Avoid surge pressures that exceed the working pressure specified in § 153.294(b).
( d ) A tank overflow must be identified with the legend “TANK OVERFLOW ALARM” in lettering as specified for the warning sign in § 153.955.
( e ) A tank overflow alarm must be audible and visible in that part of the deck where the containment systems are located and at the point where cargo loading is controlled on the tankship.
( f ) The automatic shutdown system or tank overflow alarm must be able to be checked at the tank for proper operation (for example, by electrically simulating an overfill at the tank gauge connection).
( g ) In this section, “independent” as applied to two systems means that one system will operate with a failure of any part of the other system except high level power sources and electrical feeder panels. Conduit need not be independent; the control wiring for several independent systems may be carried in a single conduit.
[CGD 81-078, 50 FR 21173, May 22, 1985]
#### Stewart et al. v. City of Pueblo.

Municipal Coepobations.

The doctrines announced in *McCord et al. v. The City of Pueblo, ante,*p. 48, are reaffirmed in this case.

*Error to the District Court of Fueblo County.*

Mr. C. E. Gast and Messrs. Arrington & McAliney, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. A. M. Nicholas and Messrs. Waldron & Devine, for defendant in error.

*56Per Curiam.

The questions involved in this case being substantially the same as those in *McCord et al. v. The City of*Pueblo, the two cases were argued and submitted together. The judgment in this must be the same as in the former. The judgment of the district court will be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed.*
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending December 4, 2010

|Filer                                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF AINSWORTH, THE | Member         | The Commercial National Bank of Ainsworth, (to be known as West Plains Bank) Ainsworth, Nebraska, to convert from a national to a state charter bank and retain its membership with the Federal Reserve. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                 | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                          | Not applicable
|DONIPHAN BANCSHARES, INC.                  | CIC            | Notification by Kenneth L. Morrison, Hastings, Nebraska, to acquire control of Doniphan Bancshares, Inc., parent of Bank of Doniphan, both in Doniphan, Nebraska.                                        | Newspaper:12/01/2010Federal Register:11/29/2010        
|Newspaper:                                 | 12/01/2010    
|Federal Register:                          | 11/29/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1731

MICHAEL PACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:07-cv-01703-RDB)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 15, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Pack, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Pack appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice for failing

to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district

court. See Pack v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. 1:07-cv-01703-RDB

(D. Md. July 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 28, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1242.30 Dismantling retired road property and depreciation (accounts XX-17-39, XX-18-39, XX-19-39, 62-17-00, 62-18-00, and 62-19-00).

Separate common expenses in each account for each subactivity (running, switching and other) in proportion to the separation of common repair and maintenance expenses associated with the particular common properties depreciated and/or dismantled.
Administrative Procedure Act 

CHECKLIST 

Agency: Maine Department of Environmental Protection 

Chapter Number and Title of Rule: 125 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners Regulation 

PROPOSED RULE : 

1 . Was this rule listed on the last regulatory agenda? yes 

2. Date of notification of: Anyone on mailing list 2/12/09 

Any trade, industry or 

professional group 2/12/09 

Any trade publications n/a 

3 . Date Notice of Rulemaking Proposal (MAPA-3) sent to Secretary of State: 2/17/09 

4. Date Fact Sheet sent to Executive Director of Legislative Council: 2/19/09 

5 . Date of publication in Secretary of State's rule-making ad. : 2/25/09 

6. Date of hearing(s) : March 19, 2009 7. Comment deadline: March 30, 2009 

ADOPTED RULE: 

8 . Was comment deadline extended or comment period reopened? No 

if yes, date of second notice publication in Secretary of State's rule-making ad: 

9. Is adopted rule consistent with what was proposed? Yes 

(If not, please address the changes in the comments and responses section of your filing .) 

10. Is the person signing the Certification Statement (MAPA-1, #9) 

authorized to do so as stated in your statutes or in 5 MRSA, c.71? _yes 

11 . Was the rule adopted within 120 days of the comment deadline? Yes 

12. Was the rule approved and signed by the Office of the 

Attorney General within 150 days of the comment deadline? Yes 

13. Is a Basis Statement included? Yes Is a copy of the Fact Sheet included? Yes 

Are comments, with names and organizations, and your responses included? Yes
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AMAL M. E L - AB E D, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72821 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 774- 881 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a m a l M . E l - A be d, ana t i ve of K uw a i tand c i t i z e n of

J or dan, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i g rat i o n j u d g e’ s (“ IJ”) rem o v al o rd er. O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law . A gu i lar G on zalezv.



# FI LED SEP 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 72821 2 Mukasey , 53 4 F . d 1 20 4, 12 08 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). W e deny i n p art , and d i sm i ss i n p art th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . C ontr aryt o E l - A be d’ s c ont e nt i on, the I Jdi d notr e l yon the c onvi c t i on re cord of hi s vac at ed pl ea , bu ti nst ea d p roperl y r el i ed on the t es t i m on y of E l -A bed and the go vernm ent ’ s w i tness i n d et erm i ni ng thatE l -A bed w as i nadm i ss i bl e und er 8 U .S .C . § 1 1 8 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( C ) f o rp artic ip a tin g in d ru g tr a f f ic k in g . Se e L opez - U

m anz or v. G on zales , 4 0 5 F . 3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 3 -5 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) (reco g n i zi n g th atw i tn ess t e s t i mo n ymays up p o rtaf i n d i n g o f i n a d mi s s i b i l i tyu n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 18 2(a) (2)( C )) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w E l - A be d’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons be c aus e he f a ile dto e x h au s t th e m b e f o r e th e a g e n c y . See A bebe v. Mukasey , 554 F . 3d 1203, 12 08 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( en banc). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
98-2208.

#### In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Peh.

On October 21, 1998, movant, the Ohio State Bar Association, filed a motion requesting this court to order Tony Peh to appeal- before the court to show cause why he failed to obey a subpoena *duces tecum*issued by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. On November 23, 1998, movant filed notice of action respondent has taken to purge itself of contempt. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the movant be awarded all costs and fees in this action, including reasonable attorney fees, that the movant incurs in prosecuting this enforcement proceeding.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.30-15 Ground connection. No person may transfer an inflammable or combustible product to or from a vessel unless— ( a ) The portable tank or IBC and its pumping equipment is electrically grounded to the hull of the vessel; and
( b ) The vessel is electrically grounded to an offshore platform, shore piping, or another vessel by a— ( 1 ) Cargo hose constructed with an integral grounding wire if the end connections are used for electrical continuity; or
( 2 ) Separate grounding that is maintained until the cargo hose is disconnected and drained.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54785, 54787 Sept. 6, 2013]
98-675.

#### State ex rel. Haylett v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On request for oral argument. Request granted.

Cook, J., dissents.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending October 8, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Shaffer, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Shaffer*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 49.]

(No. 98-1255

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Jim W. Slagle,*Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s determination that Ronald R. Shaffer is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending September 25, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97-2647.

#### Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Shafran.

On December 14,1998, respondent filed a motion for extension of time to respond to this court’s order to show cause entered November 24, 1998. Whereas the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio do not permit a request for extension of time to file a response to a show cause order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, stricken.
Exhibit 21

       The Company has as its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CFW Telephone Inc., CFW
       Network Inc.,  CFW Wireless  Inc.,  CFW Cable Inc., CFW Cable of Virginia
       Inc.,   CFW   Communications   Services  Inc.,  CFW  Licenses  Inc.,  CFW
       Information  Services Inc. and CFW PCS Inc.,  which are  incorporated  in
       Virginia and are included in the consolidated financial statements of the
       Company.  CFW  Wireless  Inc. is the  managing  partner of Virginia  RSA6
       Cellular   Limited   Partnership   and  Virginia   RSA6  Resale   Limited
       Partnership, in each of which it owns an 84% interest. These partnerships
       are  also  included  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of the
       Company.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending November 26, 2011

----

Bank Branches, DomesticAtlanta          IBERIABANK, Lafayette, Louisiana -- to establish a branch at 4894 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee.            -Approved, November 21, 2011            Atlanta          IBERIABANK, Lafayette, Louisiana -- to establish a branch at 2824 Cahaba Road, Birmingham, Alabama.            -Approved, November 21, 2011            Bank Holding CompaniesNew York          Community Bank System, Inc., Dewitt, New York -- to acquire CAI Benefits, Inc., New York, and thereby engage in employee benefits consulting services.            -Approved, November 22, 2011            Dallas          Happy Bancshares, Inc., Canyon, Texas, and SBI Acquisition Corp., Amarillo -- to acquire Signature Bancshares, Inc., Dallas, and thereby indirectly acquire Signature Bank; and for SBI Acquisition Corp. to become a bank holding company.            -Approved, November 22, 2011            Change in Bank ControlMinneapolis          Northern Financial Corporation, Independence, Wisconsin -- change in bank control of Northern Financial and its subsidiary bank, Independence State Bank, Independence.            -Permitted, November 21, 2011            Minneapolis          Northern Financial Corporation, Independence, Wisconsin -- to retain control of Northern Financial and its subsidiary bank, Independence State Bank, Independence.            -Permitted, November 23, 2011            Financial Holding Companies New York          Canandaigua National Corporation, Canandaigua, New York -- election to become a financial holding company.            -Effective, November 21, 2011            Regulations and PoliciesFOMC          Federal Open Market Committee -- minutes of the meeting on November 1-2, 2011.            -Published, November 22, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 29, 2011

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|CB FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC           | S. Christopher Williford, Wilson, North Carolina, to control up to 24.69% of the voting shares of CB Financial Corporation, Wilson, North Carolina.                                                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | Not available
|security federal         | * 3A1         | Security Federal Corporation, Aiken, South Carolina, to become a bank holding company upon the conversion of Security Federal Bank, Aiken, South Carolina, from a federal stock savings bank to South Carolina state charter. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us