alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB of Angeles Partners XI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 13, 2007
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 13, 2007



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
west virginia department of environmental protection 

# Appendix C.3 Secondary Organic Aerosol Module Modifications in CMAQ

Promoting a healthy environment.[This page intentionally left blank.]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1533

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for escaping

from a Federal prison.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 1995

Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SMITH of Texas,

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. WICKER, Mr. INGLIS

of South Carolina, Mr. CANADY of Florida, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. BARR,

and Mrs. CHENOWETH) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the

penalty for escaping from a Federal prison.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 751(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘10’’.

Æ
Release dates | 
    Full version (21 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending April 10, 2010

---





## Bank Holding Companies

|
|
|

## Change in Bank Control

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## Extensions of Time

|
|
|

## Regulations and Policies

|
|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
§ 78.30-10 Supervised patrol. ( a ) The provisions of this section shall apply to all vessels on an international voyage, and to all other vessels having berthed or stateroom accommodations for passengers. This section shall be applicable at all times when passengers are on board.
( b ) Between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., a supervised patrol shall be maintained so as to completely cover all parts of the vessel accessible to passengers or crew, excepting occupied sleeping accommodations and machinery spaces and similar spaces where a regular watch is maintained.
( c ) Clocks, keys, and recording apparatus shall be of an approved type. The station boxes shall have seals placed over the securing screws in order to leave evidence of removal or tampering.
( d ) Clocks or key stations shall be so arranged throughout the vessel so as to assure complete coverage of all accessible spaces required by paragraph (b) of this section. The number and location of recording stations, the order in which they are visited, and the number undertaken by one patrolman shall be specifically approved. The stations shall be numbered as required by § 78.47-23. Sufficient watchmen shall be available so that each space will be covered at least once in every hour except as follows: ( 1 ) On existing vessels not constructed in general agreement with §§ 72.05-5 through 72.05-60, of this subchapter, the supervised patrol shall cover all spaces required by paragraph (b) of this section at least once in every 20 minutes.
( 2 ) Public spaces constructed in general agreement with §§ 72.05-5 through 72.05-60, of this subchapter, shall have either an approved fire detecting system installed in such spaces or the supervised patrol shall cover these spaces at least once in every 20 minutes.
( e ) The patrolman shall report to the bridge at least once an hour on vessels where the supervised patrol system is not equipped with a recording apparatus in the control station. In vessels requiring more than one patrol route, one patrolman may contact others and make a joint report to the bridge. Failure of a patrolman to follow a prescribed route, or to record each station within the specified time, shall be entered on the record along with the reason for the irregularity.
( f ) The patrolman while on duty shall wear a distinctive uniform or badge, and shall have in his possession at all times an efficient flashlight.
( g ) A patrolman on duty shall have no other tasks assigned to him.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 26, 2011

|Filer                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|HARVEST BANCORP, INC. | CIC           | Notice by Mr. Mehrdad Elie of Redwood City, California, to individually acquire up to 32%, and as a group acting in concert with Mr. Mesfin Ayenew, Potomac, Maryland; Mr. David P. Como, Napa, California; Mr. Charles Turnbaugh, Baltimore, Maryland; Mr. Robert L. Gossard, Burlinggame, California; and Mr. Terrance M. Davis, Dillon Beach, California, to acquire in aggregate up to 41% of the voting securities of HarVest BanCorp, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, and indirectly acquire shares of HarVest Bank of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/18/2011
|Newspaper:            | Not available
|Federal Register:     | 02/18/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILBERT HARE, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF

AND 65 SIMILARLY SITUATED MEMBERS

OF UNITED AUTO WORKERS LOCAL UNION

NO. 668 AND EMPLOYEES OF THE GENERAL

MOTORS CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs, Case Number 15-12043

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE,

AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT

WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), and GENERAL

MOTORS LLC,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On November 20, 2015, the Court granted attorney Mandel I. Allweil’s motion to withdraw

as counsel of record in this putative class action, which left the putative class without counsel. The

Court informed Mr. Hare, the named plaintiff, that he cannot proceed pro se on behalf of a putative

class action “[b]ecause, by definition, pro se means to appear on one’s own behalf, a person may

not appear pro se on another person’s behalf in the other’s cause of action.” Cavanaugh ex rel.

Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Local Sch. Dist., 409 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir. 2005), abrogated on other

grounds by Winkelman ex rel. Winkelman v. Parma City. Sch. Dist., 550 U.S. 516, 127 (2007); see

also 28 U.S.C. § 1654 (“In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their

own cases personally or by counsel as, by the rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to

manage and conduct causes therein.”) (emphasis added). 

In the order granting attorney Mandel I. Allweil’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record

for the plaintiff, the Court informed Mr. Hare that he must either file an amended complaint, which 

2:15-cv-12043-DML-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 01/06/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 222
deleted the class references and proceed on his own behalf, or find suitable counsel to represent him

and the putative class in this case. The Court allowed Mr. Hare thirty days to make the election. 

The Court further informed Mr. Hare that if he declined to make a decision by December 21, 2015,

the case would be dismissed without prejudice. New counsel has not appeared for the plaintiff and

Mr. Hare did not file an amended complaint deleting the class references. Therefore, the case will

be dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and

without costs to any party.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: January 6, 2016

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on January 6, 2016.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-

2:15-cv-12043-DML-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 01/06/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 223
#### § 1220.5 Waiver of requirements of these regulations.

A waiver from any provision of these regulations may be made by the Board upon its own initiative or upon submission of a written request by the company. Each request for waiver shall demonstrate that unusual circumstances warrant a departure from prescribed retention periods, procedures, or techniques, or that compliance with such prescribed requirements would impose an unreasonable burden on the company.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending October 8, 2011

|Filer                          | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|NORTHERN FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC           | Notice by Marilyn Senty Ivers, Great Falls, Montana, to retain 25 percent or more of the shares of Northern Financial Corporation, Independence, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly retain control of Independence State Bank, Independence, Wisconsin. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/26/2011
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 10/26/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                       | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|STATE BK OF ALCESTER, ALCESTER, SOUTH DAKOTA | 271154 | 04/25/2011 | 09/26/2011     | O         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING BALANCE SHEET OF MGI PHARMA, INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1998, AND THE
RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,816,718
<SECURITIES>                                 9,948,778
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,799,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                    91,127
<INVENTORY>                                    731,903
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,454,570
<PP&E>                                         704,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                 868,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,617,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,579,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,038,718
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,617,946
<SALES>                                      2,628,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,761,757
<CGS>                                          207,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,237,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (97,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (97,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (97,047)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.6 House Review Panel of the Office of Fair Employment Practices]
[Page 376]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.6  house review panel of the office of fair employment practices

  The SPEAKER, pursuant to the provisions of rule LI, appointed to the 
Review Panel of the Office of Fair Employment Practices, Ms. Elizabeth 
Haas, Legal Counsel, Office of the Clerk, and Mr. Randy Johnson, 
Workplace Policy Coordinator, Committee on Economic and Educational 
Opportunities; both employees of the House of Representatives.
```
Submitted on record and briefs June 22,

conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing September 27, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RICHARD EUGENE BISWELL, *Appellant.*

(94-2250-A-C-2; CA A85322)

903 P2d 416

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*143PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to criminal conspiracy to escape. The court imposed a 24-month prison term and a 36-month post-prison supervision term. On appeal, defendant contends that, under OAR 253-05-002(2)(b), the post-prison supervision term should have been 24 months.

The state concedes that the court erred and that, although defendant did not raise the issue in the trial court, we should review it because it is an error apparent on the face of the record. ORAP 5.45(2). We accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
#### § 67.7 Vessels requiring documentation.

Any vessel of at least five net tons which engages in the fisheries on the navigable waters of the United States or in the Exclusive Economic Zone, or coastwise trade, unless exempt under § 67.9(c), must have a Certificate of Documentation bearing a valid endorsement appropriate for the activity in which engaged.

[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49230, Sept. 25, 2009]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 3, 2011

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|EDON BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1          | Edon Bancorp, Inc., Edon, OH to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of the Edon State Bank Company of Edon, Edon, OH, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) | Newspaper:09/18/2011Federal Register:09/23/2011    
|Newspaper:         | 09/18/2011    
|Federal Register:  | 09/23/2011    
|FIFTH THIRD BANK   | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio notice of intent to establish a bank branch at 6651 Lake Worth Road, Lake Worth, Florida 33467                                                  | Newspaper:09/07/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 09/07/2011    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
### 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates

14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1)

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes

the procedural requirements for the issuance of

airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a)

(1). Given the size and limited operating area associated

with the aircraft to be utilized by the Applicant, an exemption

from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an

equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of

the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C. §44701

(f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the

FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement capability, and

proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular

UAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonst rates

that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in

the restricted environment and under the conditions

proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a

conventional aircraft (fixed

- wing or rotorcraft) operating with

an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and

conditions proposed.

The sUAS to be operated hereunder is less than 5 lbs. fully

loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no

explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and opera tes

exclusively within a limited radius area as set out in the pre

flight briefing / VLOS operations. Unlike other civil aircraft,

operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and

monitored by both the Operator, pursuant to safety

requir ements, and under the requirements and in

compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide

security for the area of operation as is now done with

conventional aircraft. These safety enhancements, which

already apply to civil aircraft operat ed in connection with

video production, provide a greater degree of safety to the

public and property owners than conventional operations

conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these sa me

criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to

national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of

operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials

or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial

ex ternal load.