alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 7, 2012

|Filer             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|KEYCORP           | * 3A3       | Application by KeyCorp, Cleveland, Ohio,to retain, in a fiduciary capacity, 9.75% of the outstanding voting shares of Mechanics Financial Corporation, Mansfield, Ohio, pursuant to Section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act | Newspaper:01/30/2012Federal Register:02/02/2012
|Newspaper:        | 01/30/2012 
|Federal Register: | 02/02/2012 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|WHITAKER BK, LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY | 1445943 | 08/08/2011 | 12/09/2011     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 99.20

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake, Mineral Reserves and Resources and Governance  Interest of Experts
in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated March 6, 2015 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated February 9, 2015 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the
Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement
(No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statements (Nos.333-181577 and 333-200678) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                     |  |                                                          
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Bronkhorst
|Name:                |  | David Bronkhorst, P. Eng.                                
|Title:               |  | Vice-President, Mining and Technology,
Cameco Corporation

Date: March 6, 2015
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$3,500	May 13, 2013


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, Queensridge Mining Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (“Maker”) hereby promises
to pay to the order of The Stromer Family, PKS Trust (“Holder”) the sum of THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3,500).
This Note shall bear interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. All principal and interest due hereunder shall be paid
on or before May 13, 2015.


 


Maker hereby waives presentment, dishonor, notice of dishonor
and protest. All parties hereto consent to, and Holder is expressly authorized to make, without notice, any and all renewals, extensions,
modifications, or waivers of the time for or the terms of payment of any sum or sums due hereunder, or under any documents or instruments
relating to or securing this Note, or of the performance of any covenants, conditions or agreements hereof or thereof or the taking
or release of collateral securing this Note. Any such action by Holder shall not discharge the liability of any party to this Note.


 


This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Nevada without regard to conflict of law principles. Maker shall also pay Holder any and all costs
of collection incurred in connection with this Note, including court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.


 


Queensridge Mining Resources, Inc.


 


 


 


By: /s/ Philip Stromer


Phillip Stromer, President
and CEO
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

AsAdopted Pursuant to

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly****Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners XI(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 17, 2011

|Filer                    | Filing Type        | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|1ST UNITED BANCORP, INC. | * 3A5* 18C* Branch | 1st United Bancorp (Bancorp), Boca Raton, Florida, to merge with Anderen Financial, Inc., and thereby directly acquire its subsidiary, Anderen Bank (Bank), both of Palm Harbor, Florida. In addition, Bancorp's subsidiary, 1st United Bank, Boca Raton, Florida, will merge with Bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/06/2012 
|Newspaper:               | Not available     
|Federal Register:        | 01/06/2012        
|CAPITALMARK BANK & TRUST | * Branch           | CapitalMark Bank & Trust, Chattanooga, Tennessee, to establish the following branches: 10 Church Street, Clevland, Tennessee, to be known as the Cleveland Branch and 231 Jackson Square, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to be known as the Oak Ridge Branch.                                     | Newspaper:12/19/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 12/19/2011        
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

APR 9 2013 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: 

WU-16J 

CERTIFIED MAIL 7009 1680 0000 7664 5539 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Kenneth K. Humphreys 

Chief Executive Officer 

FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc. 

73 Central Park Plaza East 

Jacksonville, Illinois 62650 

Re: Completeness Review of Underground Injection Control (UIC) Permit Applications 

for Four Geologic Sequestration Wells; United States Environmental Protection 

Agency UIC Permit Nos. IL-137-6A-0001, -0002, -0003, & -0004 

Dear Mr. Humphreys: 

On March15, 2013, we received from FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc_ permit applications for 

four carbon dioxide sequestration wells to be located in Morgan County, Illinois. Title 40 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR) Section 124.3(c) requires us to perform a completeness 

review within 30 days of our receipt of the application. We have reviewed the applications and 

determined that the application is incomplete because the following items are missing. 

• Table 8.3 does not provide a list of contacts for States or Tribes identified to be within the 

area of review, as claimed in Table A_]_ 

• The qualifying financial responsibility instrument does not include a protective condition 

of coverage for cancellation due to failure to pay. The section referenced for this 

information in Table A.3, Section 9.4.2.6, does not exist in the permit application_ 

• Persuant to 40 CFR Part 146, Subpart H, (e) (2 & 3) either a pump test or injectivity test 

must be conducted_ Table A.3 of the applications state that these tests are "Not Planned_" 

We are proceeding with the evaluation of the information provided in the applications for 

technical soundness and compliance with applicable Underground Injection Control regulations. 

If additional information is necessary to clarify, modify, or supplement the information you 

provided, we will notify you_ When we determine that the information you provided is sufficient 

for permitting decisions, draft decisions will be made and a statement of basis for each permit 

will be prepared and supplied to you as well as the public for comment. 
lfyou have any questions, please feel free to contact Janette E. Hansen of my staff at (312) 

886-0241 or hansen.janettc@cpa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

j7,-.'\ 

I.e ·::1--

):.. / Rebecca Harvey, Chief 

/ 

0 

Y Underground Injection Control Branch 

cc: Stephen Nightingale, Illinois EPA
§ 72.01-15 Structural standards. ( a ) In general, compliance with the standards established by the American Bureau of Shipping, see subpart 70.35 of this subchapter, will be considered satisfactory evidence of the structural efficiency of the vessel. However, in special cases, a detailed analysis of the entire structure or some integral part may be made by the Coast Guard to determine the structural requirements.
( b ) [Reserved]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 11, 1995 (64), Para 64.4 Clean Water Amendments]
[Page 677]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.64.4  clean water amendments

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 140 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 961) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
  Mr. HOBSON, Acting Chairman, assumed the chair; and after some time 
spent therein,
```
Argued and submitted September 26,

reversed and remanded with instructions October 25, 1995

#### Vida TALEBI, *Respondent, v.*Mohammad Jatalachi FOOLADI, aka Tooraj J. Fooladi, aka Todras Fooladi, *Appellant.*

(18-94-05123; CA A85999)

904 P2d 201

Robert J. McCrea argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was McCrea, P.C.

Mary L. Wagner argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Shepard & Wagner, P.C.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment dismissing stalking protective order. *Starr v.*Eccles, 136 Or App 30, 900 P2d 1068 (1995); *State v. Norris-Romine/Finley,*134 Or App 204, 894 P2d 1221, *rev den*321 Or 512 (1995).
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.39 Adjournment]
[Page 1103]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.39  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. DORNAN, at 10 o'clock p.m., the House adjourned until 
9 o'clock a.m., Tuesday, July 11, 1995.
```
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Gary Ambrus" <gambrus@wyan.org> Date: 8/16/2010 8:44 AM Subject: RE: Extension for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Attachments: pic06766.gif
Hi Gary, Thanks for following up your request. EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the Wyandotte Municipal Service - Power Plant. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic06766.gif)

From: "Gary Ambrus" <gambrus@wyan.org> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "'Kerry McLenon'" <kmclenon@wyan.org> Date: 08/13/2010 02:57 PM Subject: RE: Extention for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Ms. Alicia; As of today have not received a response to my extension request. Also, left you a voice mail on your phone this afternoon concerning this.
Please advise
Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT Environmental Coordinator Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant 2555 Van Alstyne Wyandotte, Michigan 48192 (734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178gambrus@wyan.org

From: Gary Ambrus [mailto:gambrus@wyan.org] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:40 PM To: 'Alicea.jezebele@epa.com' Cc: 'Kerry McLenon' Subject: RE: Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Ms. Alicea; On behalf of Wyandotte Municipal Se rvices-Power Plant (ID # 03236), I would like to request an extension of the report deadline of at least 30 days or longer if possible. The report package was received today. Our due date would be September 20th under the 90 day request We are a small municipal power plant with limited staff. Every effort to submit the report within 90 days will be undertaken in either case.
Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT Environmental Coordinator Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant 2555 Van Alstyne Wyandotte, Michigan 48192 (734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178 gambrus@wyan.org
#### § 531.5 [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT FENNELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 4 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  ***Certification
        of Chief Executive Officer***
  
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 SECTIONS
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
        U.S.C. 1350)
 
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  
 1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                  and
 2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 Dated:
        May 7, 2007
 
 By /s/
        L.S. Smith .
 L.S.
        Smith, Chairman of the Board,
 Chief
        Executive Officer and Secretary
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies,
        Inc.
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
        separate disclosure document.
1

The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 95-2317

___________

Dexter Hughes, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Thomas Hundley, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 26, 1995

 Filed: February 27, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa state inmate Dexter Hughes appeals from the district

court's1

 denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We

affirm.

Hughes brought this action claiming that his rights were

violated when a prison disciplinary committee refused to call a

witness Hughes had requested at his disciplinary hearing. It is

undisputed that the witness was not present during the incident

giving rise to the disciplinary charge. Based on that factor and

other information in the record, we agree with the district court's

conclusion that the witness's testimony would not have affected the

outcome of the hearing. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
-2-

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Coös,

December, 1879.]

#### Adams *v.*Howe.

Upon questions of fact the finding of a referee is conclusive.

Assumpsit, for a breach'of warranty. The referee to whom the case was submitted found that the defendant sold the plaintiff a horse, and warranted it to be sound; that the horse was unsound ; and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover fifty dollars damages. The court ordered judgment on the report for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted.'

Whidden, for the defendant.

*Benton*cf Hutchins, for the plaintiff.

Bingham, J.

Upon questions of fact the finding of a referee is conclusive.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 69.201 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the procedures for measuring a vessel under the Simplified Regulatory Measurement System described in 46 U.S.C. chapter 145, subchapter III.

[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18732, Mar. 31, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.20 Recorded Vote]
[Page 892]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.20  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. KASICH:

       Strike out section 141 (page 21, lines 2 through 15) and 
     insert in lieu thereof the following:

     SEC. 141. LIMITATION ON AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT FUNDING.

       The amount provided in section 103 for procurement of 
     aircraft for the Air Force is hereby reduced by $553,000,000. 
     None of the amount appropriated pursuant to authorization of 
     appropriations in section 103 may be obligated for 
     procurement of long-lead items for procurement of B-2 
     aircraft beyond the 20 deployable aircraft and one test 
     aircraft authorized by law before the date of the enactment 
     of this Act.

It was decided in the

Yeas

203

negative

Nays

219
```