alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00372

- CR

Phillip JOHNSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR12452

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED January 8, 201 4

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
§ 96.30-15 Self-contained breathing apparatus. ( a ) Each vessel must have a self-contained breathing apparatus for use as protection against gas leaking from a refrigeration unit.
( b ) The self-contained breathing apparatus required by paragraph (a) of this section may be one of those required by § 96.35-10.
§ 67.117 Vessel name designation. ( a ) The owner of a vessel must designate a name for the vessel on the Application for Initial Issue, Exchange, or Replacement of Certificate of Documentation; or Redocumentation (form CG-1258) submitted to the Director, National Vessel Documentation Center: ( 1 ) Upon application for initial documentation of the vessel; or
( 2 ) When the owner elects to change the name of the vessel.
( b ) The name designated: ( 1 ) Must be composed of letters of the Latin alphabet or Arabic or Roman numerals;
( 2 ) May not be identical, actually or phonetically, to any word or words used to solicit assistance at sea; and
( 3 ) May not contain nor be phonetically identical to obscene, indecent, or profane language, or to racial or ethnic epithets.
( c ) The name of a documented vessel may not be changed without the prior approval of the Director, National Vessel Documentation Center.
( d ) Until such time as the owner of a vessel elects to change the name of a vessel, the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section do not apply to vessels validly documented before January 1, 1994.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31604, June 15, 1995; USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52191, Sept. 30, 1998]
#### § 1242.70 Fringe benefits (account 12-52-00).

Separate common expenses in proportion to the percentage separation calculated for the salaries and wages administration account (account 11-52-01).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending March 26, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 3184 East Sunshine Street, Springfield, Missouri. | Newspaper:04/01/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/01/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|MIDWEST BANKCENTRE, LEMAY, MISSOURI                | 657459 | 11/02/2009 | 03/03/2011     | NI        | Large Bank 
|PREMIER BK OF JACKSONVILLE, JACKSONVILLE, ILLINOIS | 35842  | 11/08/2010 | 03/04/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
*Thursday, December 3,1998*

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97-1042.

#### In re Moore.

On July 1,1997, this court suspended respondent, Michael M. Moore, a.k.a. Michael Myrwood Moore, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On November 26, 1997, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the Child Support Order previously submitted to the court. On November 5, 1998, Moore filed an affidavit of compliance. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Michael M. Moore, a.k.a. Michael Myrwood Moore, Attorney Registration No. 0029831, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the requirements of this court’s order dated July 1, 1997, requiring resppndent to comply with Gov.Bar R. X(3)(G), be waived.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2) reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R.

V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see *In re Moore*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1440, 680 N.E.2d 1015.
§ 67.205 Requirement for vessel identification. ( a ) Every instrument presented for filing and recording must contain sufficient information to clearly identify the vessel(s) to which the instrument relates.
( b ) Instruments pertaining to vessels which have been documented must contain the vessel's name and official number, or other unique identifier.
( c ) Vessels which have never been documented must be identified by one of the following: ( 1 ) The vessel's Hull Identification Number assigned in accordance with 33 CFR 181.25; or
( 2 ) Other descriptive information, which clearly describes the vessel. Such information may include length, breadth, depth, year of build, name of manufacturer, and any numbers which may have been assigned in accordance with 33 CFR part 173.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Wilfred J. Corrigan, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LSI Logic
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    [Omitted]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors:  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004 By: /s/ Wilfred J. CorriganName: Wilfred J. CorriganTitle: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.8 Cook Inlet Region Purchase of Common Stock]
[Page 376]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.8  cook inlet region purchase of common stock

  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 
421) to amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to provide for the 
purchase of common stock of Cook Inlet Region, and for other purposes; 
as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. YOUNG of Alaska and 
Mr. STUDDS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 1 61

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.12 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 961]
[Page 636]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.12  providing for the consideration of h.r. 961

  Mr. GOSS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-114) the resolution (H. Res. 140) providing for the consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 961) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 17, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 38997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3498]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 17, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 38997]]

                Proclamation 8162 of July 12, 2007

                
Death of Lady Bird Johnson

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for the memory of Lady Bird 
                Johnson, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me 
                by the Constitution and laws of the United States of 
                America, that on the day of her interment, the flag of 
                the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the 
                White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, 
                at all military posts and naval stations, and on all 
                naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District 
                of Columbia and throughout the United States and its 
                Territories and possessions until sunset on such day. I 
                also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff 
                for the same period at all United States embassies, 
                legations, consular offices, and other facilities 
                abroad, including all military facilities and naval 
                vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twelfth day of July, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 07-3498
Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
#### § 1185.6 Jointly used terminal properties.

Any person holding the position of officer or director of a carrier is relieved from the provisions of this part to the extent that he or she may also hold a directorship and any other position to which that person may be elected or appointed with a terminal railroad the properties of which are operated or used by the carrier jointly with other carriers.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 1, 1995 (59), Para 59.8 Subpoena]
[Page 606]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.59.8  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                     House of Representatives,

                                    Washington, DC, April 7, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my office has 
     received a subpoena for testimony and documents concerning 
     constituent casework. The subpoena was issued by the County 
     Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoena is consistent 
     with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                    Pat Schroeder,
                                                    Congresswoman.
```
#### § 5.27 Misconduct.

*Misconduct* is human behavior which violates some formal, duly established rule. Such rules are found in, among other places, statutes, regulations, the common law, the general maritime law, a ship's regulation or order, or shipping articles and similar sources. It is an act which is forbidden or a failure to do that which is required.
#### § 1300.3 Response to request for establishment of a new rate.

Where a shipper or a prospective shipper or person acting on behalf of a shipper or a prospective shipper requests that the carrier establish a rate in the absence of an existing rate for particular transportation, the carrier must promptly establish and provide to the requester a rate and applicable service terms. The information may be provided either in written or electronic form, as agreed to by the parties. If the parties cannot agree, such information is to be provided in electronic (non-passive) form where both parties have the requisite capabilities; otherwise, it is to be provided in writing. The response should be provided as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 10 business days from receipt of the request. If a carrier determines that additional information is required from the requester before a rate or term can be established, the carrier must so notify the requester as soon as possible, but no later than 10 business days after receipt of the request. Once the additional information is received, the carrier must set the rate and related service terms, and relay them to the requester, as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 10 business days from the receipt of the additional information. (However, the parties may agree to a different time period, in which case these time periods would not apply.) A rail carrier may, at its option, require that requests submitted under this section be in written or electronic form, although the carrier may permit oral requests.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.22 Committee Election--Minority]
[Page 1119]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.22  committee election--minority

  Mr. FAZIO, by direction of the Democratic Caucus, submitted the 
following privileged resolution (H. Res. 186):

       Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 
     hereby, elected to the committees indicated:
       (1) to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: 
     Representative Frank Mascara of Pennsylvania; and
       (2) to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: 
     Representative Tim Holden of Pennsylvania.

  When said resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
EXPLANATION

@21

Well symbol and number see text for explanation of
numbering system. Additional well data in table |.

EL CLP TESTER

Boundary of the Hackensack River Basin

y
vane *

1-12@ 67-10 1!
Wiha Al
\we ly
= Location of surface water stream-gaging station.
I.-- Hackensack River at New Milford
2.-- Hackensack River at River Vale
3.-- Pascack Brook at Westwood

3 Miles
1

1
5 Kilometers

Figure 2.-- Well location map of the Hackensack River basin.
§ 1544.213 Use of explosives detection systems. ( a ) *Use of explosive detection equipment.* If TSA so requires by an amendment to an aircraft operator's security program, each aircraft operator required to conduct screening under a security program must use an explosives detection system approved by TSA to screen checked baggage on international flights.
( b ) *Signs and inspection of photographic equipment and film.* ( 1 ) At locations at which an aircraft operator or TSA uses an explosives detection system that uses X-ray technology to inspect checked baggage the aircraft operator must ensure that a sign is posted in a conspicuous place where the aircraft operator accepts checked baggage. The sign must notify individuals that such items are being inspected by an explosives detection system and advise them to remove all X-ray, scientific, and high-speed film from checked baggage before inspection. This sign must also advise individuals that they may request that an inspection be made of their photographic equipment and film packages without exposure to an explosives detection system.
( 2 ) If the explosives detection system exposes any checked baggage to more than one milliroentgen during the inspection the aircraft operator must post a sign which advises individuals to remove film of all kinds from their articles before inspection. If requested by individuals, their photographic equipment and film packages must be inspected without exposure to an explosives detection system.
#### Samuel B. Utterbach, *Appellant, v.*Abraham P. Man and John E. Parsons, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ATRION CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,892
<PP&E>                                          31,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,139
<BONDS>                                          6,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           342
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,355
<SALES>                                         24,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,318
<CGS>                                           14,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                       444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                     165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,178
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

h1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143534

LAWRENCE HAYW OOD and MARIE HAYWOOD, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 143534 COA: 300177 KRISTY J. SCHUMAKER, R.N. Kent CC: 10-001782-NH KIMBERLY J. ZIMMERMAN, R.N. and SPECTRUM HEALTH BUTTERWORTH HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellants.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 28, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Driver v Naini , 490 Mich 239 (2011).

C AVANAGH

, J., would deny leave to appeal.

H ATHAWAY

, J., would grant leave to appeal.