alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         208,225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  617,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,904,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,979,465
<PP&E>                                       3,327,838
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,142,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,000,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,995,829
<BONDS>                                        584,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,916
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,374,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,000,396
<SALES>                                     34,194,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,194,445
<CGS>                                        8,748,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,748,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,379
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,697
<DISCONTINUED>                                 137,576
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   268,273
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 3, 2010

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|TOWER BANCORP INC. | * 3A5         | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/09/2010
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 04/09/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending March 7, 2009

|Filer                    | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------ | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|QUALITY BANKSHARES, INC. | CIC         | Gary and Mary Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, Wade and Marilyn Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, Keith and Brenda Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, and Reed Ihry, Devils Lake, North Dakota, as a group acting in concert, to acquire control of Quality Bankshares, Inc., Fingal, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of Quality Bank, Fingal, North Dakota. | Newspaper:03/09/2009Federal Register:03/16/2009
|Newspaper:               | 03/09/2009 
|Federal Register:        | 03/16/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6827

RAYVON LORENZO WILSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JACK LEE, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional

Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-02-551-3)

Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 27, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Rayvon Lorenzo Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rayvon Lorenzo Wilson seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). On appeal, he alleges that the evidence was

insufficient to support his conviction and that he received

ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because the district

court granted a certificate of appealability on the sufficiency of

the evidence claim and because we find no reversible error on

appeal, we affirm the dismissal of this claim on the reasoning of

the district court. See Wilson v. Lee, No. CA-02-551-3 (E.D. Va.

Apr. 4, 2003). Regarding Wilson’s claim of ineffective assistance,

a certificate of appealability is pending. This portion of the

order is not appealable, however, unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2000). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing.
- 3 -

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss

this portion of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED IN PART;

DISMISSED IN PART
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RICKEY BILLS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 15-cv-11414 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

PAUL KLEE, et al. 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER (1) TERMINATING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR COURT 

TO SET JURY TRIAL (ECF Nos. 125, 126) AS MOOT AND (2) DENYING 

ALL REQUESTS FOR RELIEF IN PLAINTIFF’S MOTION DOCKETED AT 

ECF No. 128 

 On February 15, 2023, the Court held an on-the-record status conference with the 

parties over video conferencing. For the reasons explained on the record during that 

conference, it is hereby ordered that: 

 Plaintiff Rickey Bills’ Motions for the Court to Set Jury Trial (ECF No. 125, 126) 

are TERMINATED AS MOOT. The Court is already in the process of searching 

for a trial date in the event that this case is not settled at mediation. 

 All of the relief requested in Bills’ motion docketed at ECF No. 128 is DENIED.

It is further ordered that, as both parties agreed on the record, this case will be 

submitted to the Pro se Prisoner Mediation Program. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: February 15, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-11414-MFL-DRG ECF No. 134, PageID.1498 Filed 02/15/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or 

counsel of record on February 15, 2023, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:15-cv-11414-MFL-DRG ECF No. 134, PageID.1499 Filed 02/15/23 Page 2 of 2
#### Isaiah S. Matthews and others, *Respondents, v.*The President, etc., of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.' Opinion by

Bockes, J.;

Learned, P. J., not acting.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0326

CITY OF GREAT FALLS,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SAXON DRU POLICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

JAN 0 7 2021

EX cswf,n

tler1W00a ist:titlrerni4 Cot., ri

' k.gry,ta

Appellant Saxon Dru Polich has filed a "Notice of Extension in Time to Respond to

Appellee," indicating that he will file his reply brief on or before February 8, 2021.

Upon consideration of Appellant's notice, Appellant is hereby granted an extension

of time until February 8, 2021, within which to file and serve his reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

DATED this 7Paay of January, 2021.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

01/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0326
#### Horton Cothrell, *Appellant, v.*Ellwood Griffin and another, *Respondents.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Nam TaiElectronics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her and his knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: November 16, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                      22,214,430
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             471
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,050,948
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     128,696,976
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       129,826,110
<LOANS>                                    287,152,888
<ALLOWANCE>                                (2,612,572)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             465,019,598
<DEPOSITS>                                 410,254,932
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,800,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,199,039
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,765,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             465,019,598
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             19,030,696
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            6,494,428
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                80,085
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            25,605,209
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          11,297,793
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,449,679
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       14,155,530
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  465,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,182
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,939,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,219,964
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,436,930
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.37
<LOANS-NON>                                  5,492,556
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,342,290
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  393,783
<RECOVERIES>                                   199,065
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,614,572
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 46.05-25 New passenger vessel.

A new passenger vessel is a vessel whose keel was laid or was a vessel converted into a passenger vessel on or after May 26, 1965.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16769, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10077, July 12, 1968]
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11766

 

ANGELES PROPERTIESXI

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.    [X] Yes [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
§ 1544.215 Security coordinators. ( a ) *Aircraft Operator Security Coordinator.* Each aircraft operator must designate and use an Aircraft Operator Security Coordinator (AOSC). The AOSC and any alternates must be appointed at the corporate level and must serve as the aircraft operator's primary contact for security-related activities and communications with TSA, as set forth in the security program. Either the AOSC, or an alternate AOSC, must be available on a 24-hour basis.
( b ) *Ground Security Coordinator.* Each aircraft operator must designate and use a Ground Security Coordinator for each domestic and international flight departure to carry out the Ground Security Coordinator duties specified in the aircraft operator's security program. The Ground Security Coordinator at each airport must conduct the following daily: ( 1 ) A review of all security-related functions for which the aircraft operator is responsible, for effectiveness and compliance with this part, the aircraft operator's security program, and applicable Security Directives.
( 2 ) Immediate initiation of corrective action for each instance of noncompliance with this part, the aircraft operator's security program, and applicable Security Directives. At foreign airports where such security measures are provided by an agency or contractor of a host government, the aircraft operator must notify TSA for assistance in resolving noncompliance issues.
( c ) *In-flight Security Coordinator.* Each aircraft operator must designate and use the pilot in command as the In-flight Security Coordinator for each domestic and international flight to perform duties specified in the aircraft operator's security program.
Board of Director Initial Grant Form
 GSI Commerce, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan  Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice
 Company Plan Award
 Participant:Date of Grant:Number of Shares subject to Award:
    
    Your Services to the CompanyConsideration:
 Vesting Schedule:
 25% of the total number of shares will vest on each of the first, second,
third and fourth annual anniversary dates of the Date of Grant.
  Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Other Agreements:




---



##### 



GSI Commerce, Inc.
    
    ParticipantBy:Signature
    
    
    
    SignatureName:
    
    
    
    Name:Print
    
    
    
    PrintTitle:
    
    
    
    Date:Date:Attachments: Restricted Stock Unit Agreement




---



##### 



Attachment I
 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
 GSI Commerce, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan  Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
 Grant Notice Agreement Company Plan Common Stock Award
  1. Distribution of Shares of Common Stock Original Distribution Date
 2. Consideration.
 3. Vesting
 4. Number of Shares
 5. Conditions to Issuance and Delivery of Shares




---



##### 



6. Execution of Documents.
 7. Non-transferability.
 8. Award not a Service Contract
 9. Unsecured Obligation




---



##### 



10. Withholding Obligations
 (a)
 (b)
 11. Notices
 12. Headings .
 13. Amendment .
 14. Miscellaneous.
 (a)




---



##### 



(b)
 (c)
 (d)
 15. Governing Plan Document
 16. Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans.
 17. Choice of Law .
 Severability.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending September 22, 2012

----

Enforcement            Capital Community Bancorporation, Inc., Provo, Utah -- written agreement dated September 10, 2009, terminated September 13, 2012.            -Announced, September 20, 2012                        Coconut Grove Bank, Miami, Florida -- written agreement dated March 17, 2010, terminated September 12, 2012.            -Announced, September 20, 2012                        First Financial Holding Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan; First Commercial Bank, Ltd.; and First Commercial Bank Los Angeles Branch, Los Angeles, California -- written agreement dated March 28, 2011, terminated September 11, 2012.            -Announced, September 18, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received: