alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          62,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  337,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,831
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               401,586
<PP&E>                                         114,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 582,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          295,415
<BONDS>                                         14,969 
<COMMON>                                           228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   582,847
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,155
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,539
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
§ 68.11 Cessation of qualification. ( a ) If after filing the certificate required by § 68.7, a change occurs whereby an 883-1 corporation no longer meets the criteria in § 68.5(a), that corporation's qualification for the privileges enumerated in §§ 68.13 and 68.15 is terminated effective as of the date and time of the change. The corporation must report the change in writing to the Director, National Vessel Documentation Center.
( b ) If, after filing the certificate required by § 68.9, a change occurs whereby the corporation is no longer entitled to be deemed a parent or subsidiary corporation, that corporation's qualification for the privileges in §§ 68.13 and 68.15 is terminated effective as of the date and time of the change. The corporation must report such change in writing to the Director, National Vessel Documentation Center.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31605, June 15, 1995; USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53225, Oct. 1, 1999. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2005-20258, 71 FR 61418, 61419, Oct. 18, 2006]
#### Lane *& a. v.*Moore.

A bankrupt defendant may be allowed to defend a suit when the assignee refuses to assume the control of the defendant’s interest in it.

Assumpsit, for materials furnished to build a livery stable. Attachment to secure statute lien. At the return term the bankruptcy of the defendant was suggested, and the action continued. At the next term it was shown that the assignee refused to appear. The defendant thereupon moved for leave to defend the suit. The court denied the motion, and ordered judgment *in*rem, to which the defendant excepted.

Whittemore, for the plaintiffs.

*A. F. L.*Norris, for the defendant.

Doe, C. J.

As a bankrupt plaintiff may be allowed to maintain a suit which his assignee refuses to prosecute or dispose of *(Towle*v. Davenport, 57 N. H. 149; *Towle*v. Rowe, 58 N. H. 394; *Ramsey*v. Fellows, 58 N. H. 607), so a bankrupt defendant may be allowed to defend a suit when the assignee refuses to assume the control of the defendant’s interest in it. The defendant’s attached property, abandoned by the assignee, is still, for some purposes, the property of the defendant. If there is an attachment not dissolved by the assignment, the defendant may have an interest in the suit. Whether he has an interest which justice requires he should be allowed to protect by contesting the suit, is a question to be determined at the trial' term. A continuance of the action to await the result of the proceedings in bankruptcy does not appear to be necessary.

*Case discharged.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FNB BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,512,403
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,349,326
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,318,372
<LOANS>                                     27,830,158
<ALLOWANCE>                                    429,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,195,556
<DEPOSITS>                                  27,234,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                   746,181
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            206,589
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,163
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,001,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              35,195,556
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,408,140
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              138,085
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               113,666
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,659,891
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             915,502
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             938,723
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,721,168
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  139,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,633,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                259,434
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     259,434
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   171,249
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.76
<LOANS-NON>                                    266,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                411,347
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               303,248
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   26,905
<RECOVERIES>                                    12,956
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              429,049
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           429,049
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 1 of 26 Pg ID 411
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 2 of 26 Pg ID 412
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 3 of 26 Pg ID 413
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 4 of 26 Pg ID 414
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 5 of 26 Pg ID 415
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 6 of 26 Pg ID 416
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 7 of 26 Pg ID 417
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 8 of 26 Pg ID 418
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 9 of 26 Pg ID 419
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 10 of 26 Pg ID 420
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 11 of 26 Pg ID 421
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 12 of 26 Pg ID 422
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 13 of 26 Pg ID 423
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 14 of 26 Pg ID 424
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 15 of 26 Pg ID 425
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 16 of 26 Pg ID 426
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 17 of 26 Pg ID 427
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 18 of 26 Pg ID 428
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 19 of 26 Pg ID 429
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 20 of 26 Pg ID 430
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 21 of 26 Pg ID 431
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 22 of 26 Pg ID 432
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 23 of 26 Pg ID 433
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 24 of 26 Pg ID 434
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 25 of 26 Pg ID 435
1:15-cv-12364-TLL-PTM Doc # 31 Filed 11/06/15 Pg 26 of 26 Pg ID 436
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 10, 1995 (63), Para 63.22 Adjournment]
[Page 676]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.63.22  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. NADLER, at 10 o'clock and 43 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
#### Jenness *v.*Jenness.

Single instances of neglect by one having the means to provide his wife with the necessaries of life, or to furnish her with medical assistance, unaccompanied by circumstances showing danger or reasonable apprehension of danger to her life or health, do not, as matter of law, constitute extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce.

Libel eoe Divorce. The petition charged extreme cruelty, and specified acts which, if true, would support the charge. A referee reported that the libellant was not entitled to a divorce, and at her request also reported that the libellee, being of sufficient ability, failed in a few instances to make the provision for his wife that he ought, and that upon one occasion, more than five years previous to the libel, he neglected to procure a physician in her sickness. The court denied the motion of the libellant to recommit the cause for further hearing, and dismissed the libel. The libellant excepted.

*J. H. Hobbs,*for the libellant.

*S. B. Garter,*for the libellee.

Allen, J.

What conduct constitutes extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce is matter of law. Whether such conduct exists is matter of fact to be proved by competent evidence. *Janvrin*v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144. Isolated instances of neglect by a husband having the ability to provide his wife with the necessaries of life, or to furnish a physician in case of sickness, unaccompanied by circumstances showing danger or apprehension of danger to her life or health, are not, as matter of law, extreme cruelty. Whether' *212the instances of neglect were such as to cause danger or a reasonable apprehension of danger to the life or health of the libellant, and prevent her from safely discharging her marital duties, was a question of fact. TBish. Mar. & Div., *s.*769. There having been a frill hearing upon the facts before the referee, there was no error in the refusal of the court to recommit the cause for further hearing. *Janvrin*v. *Janvrin,*58 N. H. 144, 146.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          39,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  332,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               503,776
<PP&E>                                         328,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,698,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,636,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,933
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,698,112
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               457,368
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  688,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                   258,245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,245
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,245
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.121 Modification, suspension or termination of special permit or grant of party status. ( a ) The Associate Administrator may modify a special permit or grant of party status on finding that: ( 1 ) Modification is necessary so that the special permit reflects current statutes and regulations; or
( 2 ) Modification is required by changed circumstances to meet the standards of § 107.113(f).
( b ) The Associate Administrator may modify, suspend or terminate a special permit or grant of party status, as appropriate, on finding that: ( 1 ) Because of a change in circumstances, the special permit or party status no longer is needed or no longer would be granted if applied for;
( 2 ) The application contained inaccurate or incomplete information, and the special permit or party status would not have been granted had the application been accurate and complete;
( 3 ) The application contained deliberately inaccurate or incomplete information; or
( 4 ) The holder or party knowingly has violated the terms of the special permit or an applicable requirement of this chapter in a manner demonstrating the holder or party is not fit to conduct the activity authorized by the special permit.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, before a special permit or grant of party status is modified, suspended, or terminated, the Associate Administrator notifies the holder or party in writing or by electronic means of the proposed action and the reasons for it, and provides an opportunity to show cause why the proposed action should not be taken. ( 1 ) Within 30 days of receipt of notice of the proposed action, the holder or party may file a response in writing or by electronic means that shows cause why the proposed action should not be taken.
( 2 ) After considering the holder's or party's response, or after 30 days have passed without response since receipt of the notice, the Associate Administrator notifies the holder or party in writing or by electronic means of the final decision with a brief statement of reasons.
( d ) The Associate Administrator, if necessary to avoid a risk of significant harm to persons or property, may, in the notification, declare the proposed action immediately effective.
[76 FR 463, Jan. 5, 2011]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending July 11, 2009

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST INTERSTATE BANK | * 18C* Branch  | First Interstate Bank, Billings, Montana, to merge with First Western Bank, Wall, South Dakota, and The First Western Bank Sturgis, Sturgis, South Dakota, and incident thereto, proposes to establish 15 branches. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | Not available 
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable
|NORLO, INC.           | 4c8            | Norlo Inc., Prior Lake, Minnesota, proposes to engage, de novo, in lending activities.                                                                                                                              | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:07/24/2009   
|Newspaper:            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:     | 07/24/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 30, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D20-1470; 3D21-0737; 3D21-0409

Lower Tribunal No. 19-29733

________________

Stanislav Fiskin,

Appellant,

vs.

Wilmington Trust, N.A., etc.,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby 

Cynamon and Charles K. Johnson, Judges.

Cotzen Law, P.A., and Michael L. Cotzen, for appellant.

Fox McCluskey Bush Robison PLLC, and Eric S. Matthew (Stuart), 

for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wilder Richman  Historic  Properties II,
L.P. (the  "Registrant")  on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Richard Paul Richman,  Chief Executive  Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  (S) 1350, as adopted  pursuant to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

/s/ Richard Paul Richman
------------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder
Richman Historic Corporation,
General Partner of the Registrant
November 25, 2005
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Woodson, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Woodson*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 309.]

(No. 98-1668

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided January 13, 1999.)

*310
      *Michael A. Bednar,*Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.31 Leave of Absence]
[Pages 747-748]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.31  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--

[[Page 748]]

  To Mr. ROGERS, for today until 12 o'clock noon;
  To Mr. KLECZKA, for today and balance of the week; and
  To Mr. LIPINSKI, for today.
  And then,
```
InventoryExpertServiceAdivisionoftheAmericanChemicalSocietySeptember14,2012AIRMAILPhone:800-631-1884,614-447-3870E-mail:answers@cas.orgWeb:www.cas.org/products/client/ThankyouforyourInventoryExpertService(IES)orderofSeptember13,2012.Theprocessingresultsforyourorderareincludedonthefollowingpage.Toensureefficientprocessingofyoursubstance,itisimportantthatyouincludethispagewithyourPMNreportformwhenreportingyoursubstancetotheEPA.Aninvoicewillbeissuedtocoverthecostoftheprocessingofyourorder.Thankyoufortheopportunitytoprovidethisservice.Ifyouhaveanyquestionspleasedonothesitatetocontactmeat614-447-3870.Kindregards,DebbyVanHooseInventoryExpertServiceEnclosure(s):InventoryExpertServiceReportCAS2540OlemangyRiverRoadP.O.Box3343Columbus.Ohio43210-0334USA

# A division

of the American

Chemical

Society 

# Inventory

Expert

Service Phone

: 800-631-1884

, 614-447-3870 

# Fax:

61

4 -447-3747 E -mail: answers@cas.org Web:

www .cas.org/products/clientl 

# INVENTORY

EXPERT

SERVICE

REPORT IES-ORDER

NUMBER: REGISTRY

NUMBER: CA INDEX

NAME Please

print

the above

CA Index

Name

on the appropriate

page

of your

PMN. 

# 0 CAS



# If this

box

is checked,

CAS

has made correction

(

s

) marked

in red

to your

IES order.

Please

make

the

same correction

(

s

) to your

PMN before submitting

it

to the

EPA. 2540 

# Olentangy

R1ver

Road



# P.O.

Box 3343

Columbus,

Ohio 43210-0334



# USAIf-••-- - ---Ii----..- -II1--- --------- ------ -Illii":t....=....=-----::::-=--_-------•·-::-·•_--------=-_---------_--:--III__.---==-===-==-..:;==7-==--=..;::_===-..••b.i\1------••--III-I••--II- ------- - -- - --