alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 10, 1995 (91), Para 91.42 Memorials]
[Page 1103]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.91.42  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII,

       126. The SPEAKER: Presented a memorial of the General 
     Assembly of the State of Nevada, relative to custody 
     requirements for prisoners that exceed constitutional 
     requirements; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
Exhitit 23.2

     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-132697 and No. 333-110888 on Form S-8, of our report dated April 13,
2005, relating to the financial statements of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2004 which  also appear in the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ Madsen & Associates CPA's, Inc.
Madsen & Associates CPA's, Inc.
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 30, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the Company.Dated: November 9, 2007
 /s/ Patrick J. Moty
    
    /s/ Linda J. MilesPatrick J. Moty
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
November 2, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128135 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE PETITION FO R PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION.

_____________ _______________ _____________ T. C. SPANN BIBLE INSTITUTE, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 128135 COA: 257034
CITY OF WESTLAND, and ASSESSOR, CITY OF WESTLAND, Respondents-Appellees. Wayne CC: 04-405432-AV

________________ _______________ __________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1026 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
November 2, 2005
Clerk
§ 1503.203 Investigations. ( a ) *General.* The Administrator, or a designated official, may conduct investigations, hold hearings, issue subpoenas, require the production of relevant documents, records, and property, and take evidence and depositions.
( b ) *Delegation of authority.* For the purpose of investigating alleged violations of a TSA requirement, the Administrator's authority may be exercised by the agency's various offices for matters within their respective areas for all routine investigations. When the compulsory processes of 49 U.S.C. 46104 are invoked, the Administrator's authority has been delegated to the Chief Counsel, each Deputy Chief Counsel, and in consultation with the Office of Chief Counsel, the Assistant Administrator for Security Operations, the Assistant Administrator for Transportation Sector Network Management, the Assistant Administrator for Inspections, the Assistant Administrator for Law Enforcement/Director of the Federal Air Marshal Service, each Special Agent in Charge, and each Federal Security Director.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending January 12, 2013

|Filer                                                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE | * 3A3         | The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and two thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                                                   | Not available
|Federal Register:                                            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 172.444 [Reserved]
#### § 1520.17 Consequences of unauthorized disclosure of SSI.

Violation of this part is grounds for a civil penalty and other enforcement or corrective action by DHS, and appropriate personnel actions for Federal employees. Corrective action may include issuance of an order requiring retrieval of SSI to remedy unauthorized disclosure or an order to cease future unauthorized disclosure.
98-1391.

#### State v. Guess.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-308. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1452, 700 N.E.2d 334. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
32624 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 13, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 07–23] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–165 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–

6575 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 07–23 with 

attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: June 7, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 13, 2007 / Notices 32625 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN13JN07.041</GPH>
32626 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 13, 2007 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN13JN07.042</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 13, 2007 / Notices 32627 

[FR Doc. 07–2919 Filed 6–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN13JN07.043</GPH>
```

[House Document 107-92]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

107th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-92

 
                 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BUDGET REQUESTS
                         FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

 REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                                DEFENSE

    June 28, 2001.--Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                         Washington, June 27, 2001.
The Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    Sir: I ask the Congress to consider the enclosed requests 
for FY 2002 budget amendments for the Department of Defense 
(DoD). These amendments would increase my proposed budget 
totals by $18.4 billion in support of national defense 
priorities.
    In this amended DoD budget request, I am proposing a total 
of $328.9 billion in discretionary budget authority. This is 
$32.6 billion, or seven percent in real growth, above the FY 
2001 enacted level of $296.3 billion and $18.4 billion more 
than included in my initial budget level of $310.5 billion.
    The revised FY 2002 Budget begins to address severe 
shortfalls in readiness, healthcare, operations, maintenance, 
and infrastructure that my Administration inherited and that 
are far worse than originally understood. The amended budget's 
increase of $18.4 billion helps remedy previously underfunded 
programs, reduces critical military shortfalls, funds realistic 
reestimates of previously understated costs, and supports 
modernization programs consistent with the early results of 
Secretary Rumsfeld's ongoing strategy review.
    The amended budget carefully targets resources to improve 
military morale, bolster readiness, and transform defense 
capabilities. It begins efforts to streamline and upgrade the 
deteriorating DoD infrastructure, which will help boost morale 
and readiness, support transformation, and ultimately save 
billions of dollars. And, it initiates several management 
reform initiatives to change the way DoD conducts business.
    The details of these requests are set forth in the enclosed 
letter from the Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget. I concur with his comments and observations.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.
    Enclosure.

    
    

```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE ROSE, #235893,

Petitioner,

 CASE NO. 5:15-CV-11963

v. HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

CATHERINE BAUMAN,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration concerning the

Court’s December 19, 2017 opinion and order denying his habeas petition on the merits. The Court

also denied a certificate of appealability and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. 

Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds no reason to reconsider its decision. A motion for

reconsideration which presents issues already ruled upon by the Court, either expressly or by

reasonable implication, will not be granted. See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D.

Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc., P.C., 967 F. Supp. 951, 952 (E.D. Mich. 1997). 

Petitioner has not met his burden of showing a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled

or his burden of showing that a different disposition must result from a correction thereof, as

required by Local Rule 7.1(h)(3).

Petitioner now indicates that he would like to return to the state courts to exhaust additional

issues. Such a request, however, is not appropriate in a motion for reconsideration. His habeas case

has already been dismissed. Moreover, he had ample time to make such a request during the

pendency of his case. In fact, the Court denied his September 12, 2017 request to amend his petition

to add a bail claim because the claim was unexhausted and he had not shown good cause for failing
to previously pursue the issue. The Court finds no reason to reconsider any of its prior decisions in

this case. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. This case

remains closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: January 25, 2018

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record

on this date, January 25, 2018, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.60-35 Availability of Certificates.

The Convention certificates must be on board the vessel and readily available for examination at all times.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6503, Feb. 9, 2000]
aena_ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2




 


ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT


 


KNOW THAT, ID PERFUMES, INC., a Nevada Corporation ("Assignor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by PARFUMS INVESTMENT I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company("Assignee"), hereby assigns and Pledges unto the Assignee, all Royalties due under the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release dated August 28, 2013 between Adrenalina, Inc., n/k/a ID Perfumes, Inc., Gigantic Parfums, LLC and Ilia Lekach and Selena Gomez and July Moon Productions, Inc. as security for all payments due and owing under the Non Negotiable Promissory Note in the original principal amount of Six Hundred and Seventy Thousand Dollars ($670,000). Once the Non Negotiable Promissory Note is paid in full and Assignment and Pledge Agreement shall be null and void.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this assignment and pledge has been duly executed by the Assignor.


 


 




	DATED:	 	 
	 	 	 
	

IN PRESENCE OF:

	 	 
	_________________________________	
ID PERFUMES, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
_________________________________

	
By: 

	/s/ Isaac Lekach	 
	 	 	Isaac Lekach	 
	 	 	President	 
	 	 	 	 







 


STATE OF CALIFORINA )


 


                                              )


$S.


COUNTY OF  _________)


 


On the  day of October, 2013, before me came, Isaac Lekach, as President of ID Perfumes, Inc. to me personally known.


 


 


__________________________________


Name:


 


Notary Public,


 


State of California


 


My Commission Expires:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,119
<PP&E>                                         306,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,343
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,163
<SALES>                                         48,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,699
<CGS>                                            9,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,532)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.06)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                         262,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  715,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,920
<INVENTORY>                                    499,814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,532,168
<PP&E>                                         826,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                 470,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,690,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,194,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                         1,126
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,494,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,690,419
<SALES>                                      5,689,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,399,948
<CGS>                                        2,529,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,785,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,813
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,625,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,625,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                710,874 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (996,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 23, 1995 (71), Para 71.2 Recess--11:10 A.M.]
[Page 804]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.71.2  recess--11:10 a.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. KIM, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess until 12 o'clock noon.
```
#### §§ 1014.131-1014.139 [Reserved]
§ 1584.113 Security training program general requirements. ( a ) *Security training program required.* Each owner/operator identified in § 1584.101 of this part is required to adopt and carry out a security training program under this subpart.
( b ) *General requirements.* The security training program must include the following information: ( 1 ) Name of owner/operator.
( 2 ) Name, title, telephone number, and email address of the primary individual to be contacted with regard to review of the security training program.
( 3 ) Number, by specific job function category identified in Appendix B to this part, of security-sensitive employees trained or to be trained.
( 4 ) Implementation schedule that identifies a specific date by which initial and recurrent security training required by § 1570.111 of this subchapter will be completed.
( 5 ) Location where training program records will be maintained.
( 6 ) Curriculum or lesson plan, including learning objectives and method of delivery (such as instructor-led or computer-based training) for each course used to meet the requirements of § 1584.115 of this part. TSA may request additional information regarding the curriculum during the review and approval process. If recurrent training under § 1570.111 of this subchapter is not the same as initial training, a curriculum or lesson plan for the recurrent training will need to be submitted and approved by TSA.
( 7 ) Plan for ensuring supervision of untrained security-sensitive employees performing functions identified in Appendix B to this part.
( 8 ) Plan for notifying employees of changes to security measures that could change information provided in previously provided training.
( 9 ) Method(s) for evaluating the effectiveness of the security training program in each area required by § 1584.115 of this part.
( c ) *Relation to other training.* ( 1 ) Training conducted by owner/operators to comply other requirements or standards may be combined with and used to satisfy elements of the training requirements in this subpart.
( 2 ) If the owner/operator submits a security training program that relies on pre-existing or previous training materials to meet the requirements of subpart B, the program submitted for approval must include an index, organized in the same sequence as the requirements in this subpart.
( d ) *Submission and Implementation.* The owner/operator must submit and implement the security training program in accordance with the schedules identified in §§ 1570.109 and 1570.111 of this subchapter.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 11, 2008   /s/ Teresa A. Herbert* Teresa A. Herbert Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00156-CR

William Thomas Hargis

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR14001108-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 10, 2022