alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1823

To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to direct the Secretary

of the Interior to allow for prepayment of repayment contracts between

the United States and the Central Utah Water Conservancy District

dated December 28, 1965, and November 26, 1985, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1995

Mr. HANSEN (for himself, Mr. ORTON, and Mrs. WALDHOLTZ) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to direct

the Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment

of repayment contracts between the United States and

the Central Utah Water Conservancy District dated December 28, 1965, and November 26, 1985, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1823 IH

1 SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CON2 TRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND

3 THE CENTRAL UTAH WATER CONSERVANCY

4 DISTRICT.

5 The second sentence of section 210 of the Central

6 Utah Project Completion Act (106 Stat. 4624) is amended

7 to read as follows: ‘‘The Secretary shall allow for prepay8 ment of repayment contracts between the United States

9 and the District dated December 28, 1965, and November

10 26, 1985 (providing for repayment of the municipal and

11 industrial water delivery facilities pursuant to those con12 tracts), under the same terms and conditions as are con13 tained in the supplemental contract providing for the pre14 payment of the Jordan Aqueduct System dated October

15 28, 1993.’’.

Æ
§ 1552.31 Security threat assessment required for flight training candidates. ( a ) *Scope of security threat assessment.* Each candidate must complete a security threat assessment and receive a Determination of Eligibility from TSA prior to initiating flight training.
( b ) *Information required.* To apply for a security threat assessment, each candidate must submit the following, in a form and manner acceptable to TSA— ( 1 ) Biographic and biometric information determined by TSA to be necessary for conducting a security threat assessment;
( 2 ) Identity verification documents; and
( 3 ) The applicable security threat assessment fee identified in § 1552.39.
( c ) *TSA Determination of Eligibility.* TSA may issue a Determination of Eligibility to the flight training provider after conducting a security threat assessment of the candidate that includes, at a minimum— ( 1 ) Confirmation of the candidate's identity;
( 2 ) A check of relevant databases and other information to determine whether the candidate may pose or poses a security threat and to confirm the individual's identity;
( 3 ) An immigration check; and
( 4 ) An FBI fingerprint-based criminal history records check to determine whether the individual has a disqualifying criminal offense in accordance with the requirements of § 1544.229 of this subchapter.
( d ) *Term of TSA Determination of Eligibility.* ( 1 ) The TSA Determination of Eligibility expires 5 years after the date it was issued, unless— ( i ) The candidate commits a disqualifying criminal offense described in § 1544.229(d) of this subchapter and, in such case, the Determination of Eligibility expires on the date the candidate was convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity;
( ii ) TSA determines that the candidate poses a security threat; or
( iii ) The candidate's authorization to remain in the United States expires earlier than 5 years and, in such case, the Determination of Eligibility expires on the date that the candidate's authorization to remain in the United States expires. Candidates may extend the term of their Determination of Eligibility up to a total of 5 years by submitting updated documentation of authorization to remain in the United States.
( 2 ) No candidate may engage in flight training after the expiration of the candidate's Determination of Eligibility.
( e ) *Processing time.* TSA will process complete security threat assessment applications within 30 days.
( f ) *Correction of the record.* A Determination of Ineligibility made by TSA on the basis of a candidate's complete and accurate record is final. If the Determination of Ineligibility was based on a record that the candidate believes is erroneous, the candidate may correct the record by submitting all missing or corrected documents, plus all additional documents or information that TSA may request, within 180 days of TSA's initial determination.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending July 21, 2012

|Filer                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|HAMPDEN BANCORP, INC.  | CIC           | Notification by Investors of America LP to retain 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the common stock of Hampden Bancorp, Inc., Springfield, Massachusetts, the holding company for Hampden Bank, Springfield, Massachusetts,  pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:             | Not available
|Federal Register:      | Not available
|INDEPENDENT BANK CORP. | * 3A5* 3A3    | Application by Independent Bank Corp, Rockland, Massachusetts, to acquire Central Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, Central  Co-operative  Bank, both of Somerville, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.   | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/30/2012   
|Newspaper:             | Not available
|Federal Register:      | 07/30/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### John H. Gee, *Plaintiff, v.*Frank Arnold, *Defendant*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
§ 1150.14 Proposed service. ( a ) A copy of all agreements between the D-OP, the offeror of the rail service continuation payment, and the owner of the line to be operated.
( b ) Any additional information which is necessary to provide the Board with a description of: ( 1 ) The line over which service is to be provided (e.g., U.S.R.A. Line); and
( 2 ) All interline connections, including the names of the connecting railroads.
Exhibit  32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, L.S. Smith, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:







1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 6, 2011





By  /s/ L.S. Smith                                .


L.S. Smith, Chairman of the Board,


Chief Executive Officer and Secretary





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Safe Technologies International,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen Durland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Stephen Durland
---------------------------
Stephen Durland, Chief Executive Officer



March 28, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Jiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 11, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Frank Jiang
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  | Frank Jiang Chief Executive
Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danny Sui Keung Chau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 11, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Danny Sui Keung Chau
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Danny Sui Keung Chau Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great China
International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Great China International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Eli Owens, *Respondent, v.*A. J. Walling, *Appellant*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### George W. Cramer and another, *Respondents, v.*Gardner D. Warren, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
§ 1132.2 Procedures in certain suspension matters. ( a ) A petition for reconsideration may be filed by any interested person within 20 days after the date of service of a Board decision which results in an order for: ( 1 ) Investigation and suspension of collective ratemaking actions, or
( 2 ) Investigation (without suspension) of collective ratemaking actions.
( b ) Any interested person may file and serve a reply to any petition for reconsideration permitted under paragraph (a) of this section within 20 days after the filing of such petition with the Board, but if the facts stated in any such petition disclose a need for accelerated action, such action may be taken before expiration of the time allowed for reply. In all other respects, such petitions and replies thereto will be governed by the rules of general applicability of the Rules of Practice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1998
<CASH>                                             110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                       177
<INVENTORY>                                     20,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,086
<PP&E>                                          17,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,446
<SALES>                                         94,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,418
<CGS>                                           44,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,470
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
#### Elisha S. Fowler and Amy B. Lyons, *Appellants, v.*Nicholas H. Haynes, *as Constable, etc., Respondent*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending June 20, 2009

|Filer                         | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|PEOPLESSOUTH BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC         | After-the-fact notification filed by Dr. H.J. Merritt, Ruth D. Merritt, and Melanie Williams, all of Colquitt, Georgia, and Marianne Melton, Damascus, Georgia, to retain 12.76 percent of the outstanding shares of PeoplesSouth BancShares, Inc., and its subsidiary, PeoplesSouth Bank, both of Colquitt, Georgia. | Newspaper:07/06/2009Federal Register:06/26/2009
|Newspaper:                    | 07/06/2009 
|Federal Register:             | 06/26/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                   | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CITIZENS TR BK, ATLANTA, GEORGIA         | 680130  | 02/09/2009 | 05/28/2009     | O         | Int Sm Bank
|FRANKLIN SYNERGY BK, FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE | 3635533 | 12/01/2008 | 05/31/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending October 13, 2012

---





## Enforcement

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Barry L. Lazarus, the Chief Executive Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(1) | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 ("Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                         





|      |                         | 
|----- | ----------------------- | 
|      | /s/ Barry L. Lazarus    | 
|      |                         | 
|By:   | Barry L. Lazarus        | 
|      | Chief Executive Officer
|      |                         | 
|Date: | October 31, 2005        |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27838; Airspace Docket No. 07-ACE-6]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Hugoton, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Hugoton, KS.

DATES: Effective Date: The direct final rule published at 72 FR 23767, 
May 1, 2007, is confirmed to be 0901 UTC, August 30, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT 
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on May 1, 2007 (72 
FR 23767). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on August 30, 2007. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on June 27, 2007.
Donald R. Smith,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07-3445 Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M