alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IRENE BURDALAS, CASE NO. 5:15-cv-11980-JEL-EAS

Plaintiff,

v. Judge Judith E. Levy

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

an Ohio corporation,

TRANS UNION, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company,

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,

a Georgia corporation, and

ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC,

a Delaware corporation,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, ONLY, 

WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS

______________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff, Irene Burdalas, by counsel, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A), hereby 

dismisses Defendant Equifax Information Services, only, with prejudice and with each party to 

bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gary D. Nitzkin

Gary D. Nitzkin, Esq.

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Rd.

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: 248-353-2882

Email: gnitzkin@creditor-law.com

Dated: August 24, 2015 Counsel for Irene Burdalas 

Case 5:15-cv-11980-JEL-EAS ECF No. 21 filed 08/24/15 PageID.137 Page 1 of 2
2

Proof of Service

I, Trish Basiaga hereby state that on August 24, 2015 , I served a copy 

of the within pleading upon all counsel and parties at their addresses as they 

appear on the record via email through the court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Trish Basiaga

Case 5:15-cv-11980-JEL-EAS ECF No. 21 filed 08/24/15 PageID.138 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.450 Termination of classification society authority. ( a ) The Coast Guard may terminate an authorization agreement with a classification society to participate in the Alternate Compliance Program if: ( 1 ) The Commandant revokes the classification society's recognition, as specified in § 8.260; or
( 2 ) The classification society fails to comply with the conditions of the authorization agreement as specified in § 8.130.
( b ) In the event that a flag administration of a country changes conditions related to the authority that is delegated to ABS, the Commandant may modify or revoke the Coast Guard's authorization of that classification society that has its headquarters in that country.
( c ) Certificates issued by a classification society which has had its authorization to participate in the Alternate Compliance Program terminated, will be subject to the provisions of § 8.330.
( d ) Owners or operators of vessels enrolled in the ACP and classed by a classification society that has its authority to participate in the ACP terminated, must: ( 1 ) Change the classification society for the vessel to a classification society that is authorized to participate in the ACP; or
( 2 ) Disenroll the vessel from the ACP.
( e ) The Coast Guard will provide guidance to a vessel owner affected by the revocation of a classification society's authority to participate in the ACP. This will include notification of when the action required under paragraph (d) of this section must be completed.
[CGD 95-010, 62 FR 67532, Dec. 24, 1997, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58342, Sept. 30, 2004]
94 Central Avenue, Albany, NY 12206; (518) 465-4600; www.citizenactionny.org

April 30, 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry

Secretary of State

US Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, 20520

The Honorable Penny Pritzker

US Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20230

Dear Secretary Foxx, Secretary Kerry and Secretary Pritzker, 

I am writing to you today about an important step we can take to help protect high-paying jobs that are 

essential to powering prosperity to communities throughout the State of New York.

Over the past 10 years, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline have received at least $42 billion in 

government subsidies and other unfair benefits in violation of U.S. Open Skies policy. Citizen Action is asking 

that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to address 

the huge subsidies that those nations provide their state-owned airlines. We also believe the U.S. government 

should seek a freeze on the introduction of new passenger service by the Gulf carriers during these consultations.

The tens of billions of dollars in subsidies for state-owned Gulf carriers is contributing to excess capacity, which 

draws passengers and revenue from U.S. airlines. If U.S.-based airlines continue to lose market share, it will lead 

to service cuts and ultimately American job losses. According to a white paper released by the Partnership for 

Open & Fair Skies, each flight that is lost to Qatar, Etihad or Emirates will result in an average net loss of 821 

good U.S. jobs.

In New York, John F. Kennedy Airport is a key factor in the region’s economic growth. The airport employees

69,000 pilots, flight attendants, maintenance workers, baggage crews, ticketing agents and other airport
personnel and contributes $4.1 billion in wages annually. Our local communities can’t afford to lose these highpaying jobs as a result of unfair business practices by foreign carriers.

It is the U.S. government’s responsibility to ensure that airlines are complying with the Open Skies agreement,

which is why we are asking you to open consultations on this issue so that the flow of subsidized capacity into 

the U.S. market can be addressed and American jobs protected.

Thank you for your consideration of this important matter.

Karen Scharff

Executive Director

Cc:

Senator Chuck Schumer

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand

U.S. Rep Steve Israel

U.S. Rep Joe Crowley

U.S. Rep Gregory Meeks

U.S. Rep Grace Meng

U.S. Rep Sean Patrick Maloney

U.S. Rep Jerrold Nadler

U.S. Rep Nita Lowey

U.S. Rep Jose Serrano

U.S. Rep Eliot Engel

Governor Andrew Cuomo

Mayor Bill de Blasio
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 15, 1995 (80), Para 80.14 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 1007]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.80.14  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. SPENCE, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill the Clerk be 
authorized to correct section numbers, cross references, and 
punctuation, and to make such stylistic, clerical, technical, 
conforming, and other changes as may be necessary to reflect the actions 
of the House in amending the bill.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 126 (Monday, July 2, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 36335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3254]



[[Page 36333]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part VIII





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of June 26, 2007--Assignment of Functions Under Section 1035 
of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2007


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 36335]]

                Memorandum of June 26, 2007

                
Assignment of Functions Under Section 1035 of the 
                John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 2007

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby 
                assign to the Secretary of Defense the functions of the 
                President under section 1035 of the John Warner 
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 
                (Public Law 109-364). The Secretary of State, and the 
                heads of other executive departments and agencies 
                identified in the report required under section 1035, 
                should concur with the report.

                The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 26, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-3254
Filed 6-29-07; 11:29 am]
Billing code 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 126 (Monday, July 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 36010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service


Reimbursement Rates for Calendar Year; Correction

AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Indian Health Service published a document Federal 
Register on June 20, 2007, concerning rates for inpatient and 
outpatient medical care provided by Indian Health Service facilities 
for Calendar Year 2007 for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries of other 
Federal Programs. The document contained five incorrect rates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Elmer Brewster, Special Assistant, 
Office of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 801 
Thompson Avenue, Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852, Telephone 301-443-
2419. (This is not a toll-free number.)

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of June 20, 2007, in FR Doc. 07-3037, on 
page 34018, in the third column, under the heading ``Inpatient Hospital 
Per Diem Rate (Excludes Physician/Practitioner Services)'' ``Lower 48 
States: $1725. Alaska: $2,208.'' should read ``Lower 48 States: $1726. 
Alaska: $2215.'' Under the heading, ``Outpatient Per Visit Rate 
(Excluding Medicare)'' ``Alaska: $398.'' should read ``Alaska: $405.'' 
Under the heading, ``Outpatient Per Visit Rate (Medicare)'' ``Alaska: 
$356.'' should read ``Alaska: $354.'' Under the heading, ``Medicare 
Part B Inpatient Ancillary Per Diem Rate'' ``Alaska: $613.'' should 
read ``Alaska: $625.''

    Dated: June 25, 2007.
Phyllis Eddy,
Deputy Director for Management Operations, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 07-3203 Filed 6-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          49,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,873
<PP&E>                                         273,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,075
<OTHER-SE>                                     311,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,260
<SALES>                                        347,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,364
<CGS>                                           93,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 75,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,421
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,659
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED PURSUANT TO SEC REGULATION S-K, ITEM 601, 
TO CONFORM TO SFAS NO. 128. "EPS-PRIMARY" DENOTES BASIC EPS.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 31, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.240 Application for recognition. ( a ) A classification society must apply for recognition in writing to the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( b ) An application must indicate which specific authority the classification society seeks to have delegated.
( c ) Upon verification from the Coast Guard that the conditions of reciprocity have been met in accordance with § 8.120, the requesting classification society must submit documentation to establish that it meets the requirements of § 8.230.
#### Andrew Koch, *Guardian, etc., Respondent, v.*Otto Meyer, *Appellant.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

TORRE DAMIO SANDERS, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0349 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2017-154800-002

The Honorable Ronee Korbin Steiner, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Philip Garrow

Counsel for Respondent

Torre Damio Sanders, Jr., San Luis

Petitioner

FILED 07-16-2024
STATE v. SANDERS

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, and Judge 

David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Torre Sanders seeks review of the superior court’s 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is the petitioner’s 

seventh petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that the petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Maria B. Chapman, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Edwin N. Chapman et al., as Executors and Trustees Respondents.

*Matter of Chapman,*138 App. Div. 923, affirmed.

(Argued September 27, 1910;

decided October 11, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 9, 1910, which affirmed an order of the Kings County-Surrogate’s Court excluding from transfer taxation a trust fund given to the decedent for life, with testamentary power of appointment, and remainder over, subject to such power, to her issue.

*William*IF. *Wingate*for appellant.

*James Allison Kelly*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur! Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscook, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50796

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTONIO MOLINA-GONZALEZ, also known as Antonio Molina,

Defendant-Appellant

___________________________________________________

Cons. w/No. 11-50875

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v. 

ANTONIO MOLINA-GONZALEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-522-1

USDC No. 3:08-CR-3327-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 14, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 11-50796

c/w No. 11-50875

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Molina-Gonzalez (Molina) pleaded guilty to entering the United

States illegally following deportation and was sentenced within the advisory

guidelines range to a 21-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year period

of supervised release. Molina was also found to have been in violation of the

conditions of his supervised release related to a prior illegal-reentry conviction.

For that, he was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to a consecutive

nine-month term of imprisonment. In imposing the consecutive sentence, the

district court considered Molina’s prior assaultive conduct and the need to deter

him from returning to the United States. 

In these consolidated appeals, Molina contends that the district court

imposed an unreasonably harsh sentence by ordering that his two sentences be

served consecutively. He asserts that the nine-month consecutive sentence was

greater than necessary to achieve the statutory goals of sentencing because it

failed to reflect his personal circumstances. 

We have reviewed these contentions for plain error. See United States v.

Davis, 602 F.3d 643, 646-47 (5th Cir. 2010). Because the sentences for the new

offense and the revocation sentence were within the advisory guidelines ranges,

they are presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez,

526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008). Molina has failed to rebut the presumption

of reasonableness. See id.

AFFIRMED.
§ 64.95 Piping. ( a ) Piping, valves, flanges, and fittings used in the pumping system must be designed in accordance with part 56 of this subchapter.
( b ) A cargo loading and discharge header or manifold must— ( 1 ) Have stop valves to prevent cargo leakage; and
( 2 ) Be visible to the operator at the cargo pump controls.
( c ) Each pipe and valve in the pumping system that has an open end must have a plug or cap to prevent leakage.
( d ) Each hose connection must be threaded or flanged except for a quick connect coupling that may be specifically accepted by the U.S. Coast Guard in accordance with the procedures in § 50.25-10 of this subchapter.
( e ) A non-return valve must be in the pump discharge if a backflow condition may occur during pumping.
( f ) Any non-metallic flexible hose that is used in the piping system must comply with § 56.60-25(c) of this subchapter.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22950, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58346, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50200, June 12, 2024]
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.34

                    FIRST AMENDMENT TO E-COMMERCE AGREEMENT

  This FIRST AMENDMENT TO E-COMMERCE AGREEMENT made the 25th day of May, 1999
by and between GLOBAL SPORTS INTERACTIVE, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation
("GSI") and DUNHAM'S ATHLEISURE CORPORATION ("Retailer").

                                  WITNESSETH:

  WHEREAS, on April 1, 1999, GSI and Retailer entered into an E-Commerce
Agreement ("Agreement") pursuant to which GSI agreed to act as the outsourcing
company providing the Retailer's on-line customers the complete e-commerce
shopping experience; and

  WHEREAS, GSI and Retailer desire to amend the Agreement, all as hereinafter
set forth.

  NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby,
agree as follows:

  1. The Agreement is amended to add the following paragraph 32:

    Upon execution of this First Amendment by Retailer, and acceptance
    thereof by GSI, prior to the announcement of GSI's e-commerce
    initiative, GSI will deliver to Retailer a Warrant to Purchase Shares
    of Global Sports, Inc., the parent corporation of GSI, in accordance
    with the terms set forth in the Warrant Term Sheet attached hereto as
    Exhibit "B".

  2. Retailer acknowledges that it is aware that GSI is negotiating with The
     Sports Authority, Inc. ("TSA") pursuant to which GSI and TSA will form a
     separate joint venture to operate TSA's on-line business. Retailer
     acknowledges that the joint venture between GSI and TSA is not the type
     of agreement which would entitle Retailer to invoke the "favored
     nations" clause contained in the first sentence of Section 3.8 of the
     Agreement, and Retailer consents to GSI entering into such joint venture
     with TSA.

  3. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
     affect and unamended.

                                          GLOBAL SPORTS INTERACTIVE, INC.,
                                          a Pennsylvania corporation

                                                   /s/ Michael G. Rubin
_____________________________________     BY: _________________________________
ATTEST


                                          DUNHAM'S ATHLEISURE CORPORATION

                                                    /s/ Marshall Sosna
_____________________________________     BY: _________________________________
ATTEST