alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
hmi10q_08312013ex10.7






HERMAN MILLER, INC. 
EXECUTIVE EQUALIZATION RETIREMENT PLAN
First Amendment
Herman Miller, Inc., a Michigan corporation, on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries who have adopted the Plan (collectively, the “Company”), maintains the Herman Miller, Inc. Executive Equalization Retirement Plan (the “Plan”). 
The Company maintains a tax-qualified cash balance pension plan known as the Herman Miller, Inc. Retirement Income Plan (the “pension plan”) and a tax-qualified profit-sharing plan, including a 401(k) retirement savings arrangement, known as the Herman Miller, Inc. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the “profit-sharing plan”). 
The Company has maintained this Plan since January 1, 2008, as a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, to provide additional retirement benefits for certain of its management and other highly compensated employees. Under the current terms of the Plan, cash balance contributions are currently made to participant accounts in order to supplement the pay credits under the pension plan. 
Pay credits under the pension were discontinued on September 1, 2012 (the “hard freeze”) and replaced with core contributions to the profit-sharing plan. 
The Company now desires to amend the Plan in order to reflect the changes made to the pension and profit-sharing plans. 
The Plan is amended as follows: 
1.Section 4.1(c) of the Plan, regarding cash balance contributions, is amended to read as follows: 
(c)     Core Profit Sharing. The Company will contribute to the fund as a core profit sharing contribution for each plan year an amount equal to 4% (or, if less, the core contribution percentage under the Company’s Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan for the plan year) of each participant’s excess compensation for the plan year. 
2.    Section 4.1(d) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
(d)    Additional Profit Sharing. The Company will contribute to the fund as an additional profit sharing contribution for each plan year the amount determined by the executive compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors. 
3.    Section 4.3 of the Plan is amended to delete “and cash balance” everywhere it appears. 
4.    Section 5.2(d) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
(d)     Core Profit Sharing Contributions. As soon as administratively feasible after the end of each plan year, the Company’s core profit sharing contributions for the plan year will be credited to the accounts of participants who are employed by the Company on the last day of the plan year in an amount 







equal to 4% (or, if less, the core contribution percentage under the Company’s Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan for the plan year) of the participant’s excess compensation for the plan year. 
5.    Section 5.2(e) of the Plan is amended to replace “Profit Sharing” with “Additional Profit Sharing” in the caption and “profit sharing” with “additional profit sharing” in the first sentence. 


This amendment is dated [ Month Signed ] ____, 2012 and is effective as of September 1, 2012. 
Company 
Herman Miller, Inc., a Michigan corporation 
 
 
By       
Its President
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending June 30, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|EDEN VALLEY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Change in control notice by Todd J. Zaun, Sartell, Minnesota, and Steven M. Zaun, Marina Del Ray, California, each to acquire 25% or more of the shares of Eden Valley Bancshares, Eden Valley, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire control of State Bank in Eden Valley, Eden Valley, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 2252

_____________________________ C LINTON C OOPER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

.

January 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B ILBREY , N ORDBY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ. , concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary
, Public Defender, and Tyler K. Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 15, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 92.05-10 Lamp room construction. ( a ) Lamp, paint, and oil lockers and similar compartments shall be constructed of steel or shall be wholly lined with metal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,780
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48,780)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending February 17, 2007

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIRST BANK        | * Branch       | First Bank, St. Louis, Missouri, to establish a branch facility to be located at 17000 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 103, Encino, California. | Newspaper:03/03/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 03/03/2007    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 169.230 Underwater Survey in Lieu of Drydocking (UWILD). ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), on a case-by-case basis, may approve an underwater survey instead of a drydock examination at alternating intervals if your vessel is— ( 1 ) Less than 15 years of age;
( 2 ) A steel or aluminum hulled vessel;
( 3 ) Fitted with an effective hull protection system; and
( 4 ) Listed in § 169.229(a)(1) or (2) of this part.
( b ) For vessels less than 15 years of age, you must submit an application for an underwater survey to the OCMI at least 90 days before your vessel's next required drydock examination. The application must include— ( 1 ) The procedure for carrying out the underwater survey;
( 2 ) The time and place of the underwater survey;
( 3 ) The method used to accurately determine the diver's or remotely operated vehicle's (ROV) location relative to the hull;
( 4 ) The means for examining all through-hull fittings and appurtenances;
( 5 ) The condition of the vessel, including the anticipated draft of the vessel at the time of survey;
( 6 ) A description of the hull protection system; and
( 7 ) The name and qualifications of any third party examiner.
( c ) If your vessel is 15 years old or older, the cognizant District Commander, on a case-by-case basis, may approve an underwater survey instead of a drydock examination at alternating intervals. You must submit an application for an underwater survey to the OCMI at least 90 days before your vessel's next required drydock examination. You may be allowed this option if— ( 1 ) The vessel is qualified under paragraphs (a)(2) through (4) of this section;
( 2 ) Your application includes the information in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(7) of this section; and
( 3 ) During the vessel's drydock examination, preceding the underwater survey, a complete set of hull gaugings was taken and they indicated that the vessel was free from appreciable hull deterioration.
( d ) After the drydock examination required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the OCMI submits a recommendation for future underwater surveys, the results of the hull gauging, and the results of the Coast Guards' drydock examination results to the cognizant District Commander, for review.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21083, Apr. 29, 2002]
#### Sloan v. Sloan’s Admr.

(Decided October 14, 1919.)

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court.

Divorce — Alimony—Appeal.—While the Court of Appeals has no power to reverse a decree of divorce, it may review the evidence for the purpose of determining whether the alimony allowed was sufficient.

E. BERTRAM for appellant.

S. G. SMITH for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

Charging that her husband, W. E. Sloan, was guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment, Blanche Sloan brought this suit for divorce and alimony, and for the custody of their infant child. Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim, denying the allegations of the petition and asking a divorce from plaintiff on the ground of abandonment. On final hearing plaintiff was granted a divorce and $200.00 alimony, and was also awarded the custody of the child. Being dissatisfied with the amount of alimony, plaintiff appeals.

Though we are without power to reverse the decree of divorce, we may review the evidence for the purpose *370óf determining ■whether the alimony allowed was sufficient. Caudill v. Caudill, 172 Ky. 460, 189 S. W. 431. We deem it unnecessary to detail the evidence. It is sufficient to say that, we have carefully considered it, and are. of the opinion that plaintiff should have been awarded alimony in the snm of $450.00.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment in conformity with this opinion.
Exhibit 10.(b)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-190294) of our report dated March 28, 2013 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-190294) of our report dated April 23, 2013, relating to the financial statements of the Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Birmingham, Alabama

October 25, 2013
*Tuesday, December 1, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

94-2537.

#### State v. Wilson.

Lorain App. No. 92CA005396. Upon appellant’s notice that all state posLconviction proceedings are now exhausted,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that a new execution date be set.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Monday, the 1st day of March, 1999, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that the Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Lorain County.
§ 1104.7 Computation and extension of time. ( a ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time, the day of the act, event, or default upon which the designated period of time begins to run is not included. The last day of the period is included unless it is Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday in the District of Columbia, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or holiday. This rule applies to forward and backward measurement of time.
( b ) *Extensions.* Any time period, except those provided by law or specified in these rules respecting informal complaints seeking damage, may be extended by the Board in its discretion, upon request and for good cause. Requests for extensions must be served on all parties of record at the same time and by the same means as service is made on the Board. However, if service is made on the Board in person and personal service on other parties is not feasible, service on other parties should be made by first class or express mail. A request for an extension must be filed not less than 10 days before the due date, except that in cases seeking expedited relief for service emergencies under part 1146 of this chapter, a request for an extension must be made within 24 hours of service of the petition, reply, or other filing or procedural order of the Board as applicable. Only the original of the request and certificate of service need be filed with the Board. If granted, the party making the request should promptly notify all parties to the proceeding of the extension and so certify to the Board, except that this notification is not required in rulemaking proceedings.
( c ) *Exception to time computation rules.* See 49 CFR part 1152 for special abandonment rules.
[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996; 89 FR 4578, Jan. 24, 2024]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1623

To amend the Public Health Service Act to repeal family planning programs

under title X of the Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1995

Mr. DORNAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to repeal family

planning programs under title X of the Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Planning Pro5 grams Repeal Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TITLE X PROGRAMS FOR FAMILY PLAN7 NING.

8 Title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.

9 300 et seq.) is repealed.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 18, 1995 (69), Para 69.8 Unfinished Business--Approval of the Journal]
[Page 754]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.69.8  unfinished business--approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WATTS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the question on agreeing to the 
Chair's approval of the Journal of Wednesday, May 17, 1995.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to the Chair's approval of said Journal?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WATTS, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. TATE objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

360

Nays

37

When there appeared

Answered present

1
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1825 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1825

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to limit acquisition of land on 
  the 39-mile headwaters segment of the Missouri River, Nebraska and 
 South Dakota, designated as a recreational river, to acquisition from 
                            willing sellers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1995

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to limit acquisition of land on 
  the 39-mile headwaters segment of the Missouri River, Nebraska and 
 South Dakota, designated as a recreational river, to acquisition from 
                            willing sellers.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON LAND ACQUISITION: MISSOURI RIVER, NEBRASKA AND 
              SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The undesignated paragraph in section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic 
Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) relating to the 39-mile segment of the 
Missouri River, Nebraska and South Dakota, from the headwaters of Lewis 
and Clark Lake to Ft. Randall Dam is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``Notwithstanding section 6(a), lands and interests in lands 
may not be acquired for the purposes of this paragraph without the 
consent of the owner thereof.''.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1878

To extend for 2 years the period of applicability of enrollment mix requirement to certain health maintenance organizations providing services

under Dayton Area Health Plan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 16, 1995

Mr. HOBSON (for himself and Mr. HALL of Ohio) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To extend for 2 years the period of applicability of enrollment

mix requirement to certain health maintenance organizations providing services under Dayton Area Health Plan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENDING PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY OF EN4 ROLLMENT MIX REQUIREMENT TO CERTAIN

5 HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS

6 PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER DAYTON AREA

7 HEALTH PLAN.

8 Section 2 of Public Law 102–278, as amended by sec9 tion 13644 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
2

HR 1878 IH

1 1993, is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 1995’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘December 31, 1999’’.

Æ