alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 172.334 Identification numbers; prohibited display. ( a ) No person may display an identification number on a RADIOACTIVE, EXPLOSIVES 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 or 1.6, DANGEROUS, or subsidiary hazard placard.
( b ) No person may display an identification number on a placard, orange panel or white square-on-point display configuration unless— ( 1 ) The identification number is specified for the material in § 172.101;
( 2 ) The identification number is displayed on the placard, orange panel or white square-on-point configuration authorized by § 172.332 or § 172.336(b), as appropriate, and any placard used for display of the identification number corresponds to the hazard class of the material specified in § 172.504;
( 3 ) Except as provided under § 172.336 (c)(4) or (c)(5), the package, freight container, or transport vehicle on which the number is displayed contains the hazardous material associated with that identification number in § 172.101.
( c ) Except as required by § 172.332(c)(4) for a combustible liquid, the identification number of a material may be displayed only on the placards required by the tables in § 172.504.
( d ) Except as provided in § 172.336, a placard bearing an identification number may not be used to meet the requirements of subpart F of this part unless it is the correct identification number for all hazardous materials of the same class in the transport vehicle or freight container on which it is displayed.
( e ) Except as specified in § 172.338, an identification number may not be displayed on an orange panel on a cargo tank unless affixed to the cargo tank by the person offering the hazardous material for transportation in the cargo tank.
( f ) If a placard is required by § 172.504, an identification number may not be displayed on an orange panel unless it is displayed in proximity to the placard.
( g ) No person shall add any color, number, letter, symbol, or word other than as specified in this subchapter, to any identification number marking display which is required or authorized by this subchapter.
[Amdt. 172-101, 45 FR 74667, Nov. 10, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 172-104, 51 FR 23078, June 25, 1986; Amdt. 172-110, 52 FR 29528, Aug. 10, 1987; Amdt. 172-123, 55 FR 52593, Dec. 21, 1990; 56 FR 66255, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 172-127, 59 FR 49133, Sept. 26, 1994]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1787 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1787

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to repeal the 
                     saccharin notice requirement.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1787

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to repeal the 
                     saccharin notice requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTICE REQUIREMENT REPEAL.

    Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343) is amended by striking paragraph (p).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50993

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIA ANDREA CHAVEZ-GALINDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-161-1-WWJ

--------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Maria Andrea

Chavez-Galindo raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### THE NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, *v.*JOHN T. HAROLD, JONATHAN T. DEYO and MARY E. BARBER, Respondents.

*Costs*— *extra allowance*— *a demwrrm' is a defense within the mecming of section*3253 *of the Code of Civil Procedure.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendants, and from an order granting an extra allowance to the defendants.

The court at General Term, after holding that the demurrer was .properly sustained, said : ‘‘We incline to the opinion that a demurrer is a defense within the meaning of section 3253 of the Code, and that the order granting an additional allowance should be affirmed, with costs "and disbursements.”

*John U. Bergen*and *David Dudley*Field, for the appellant.

*Chauncey*Shaffer, for the respondents Harold and Barber.

*A. H.*Dailey, for the respondent Deyo.

Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J. concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, including the order granting extra allowance.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(d)

                                    FORM OF
                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
                        BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND EACH OF
                       R. SCOTT BACON AND DAVID D. HINDLE

     This Amendment to the existing Severance Agreement between the parties
hereto is entered into this first day of January 1998 by and between Peoples
Heritage Financial Group, Inc., (the "Company"), a Maine financial institution
with its principal place of business at One Portland Square, Portland, Maine
04112, and David D. Hindle (the "Executive"), an individual and employee of the
Company.

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have previously entered into a
Severance Agreement dated December 7, 1996 (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to modify said Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above, the legal sufficiency of
which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, said parties agree to amend their
Agreement as follows:

     Paragraph 7(d)(ii) is deleted in its original form and replaced by the
following:

          the Executive shall receive from the Company, no less than ten days
          following termination of his or her employment, a lump sum payment
          (the "Termination Payment") equal to three (3) times the Executive's
          Annual Compensation;

     Paragraph 7(d)(v) is deleted in its original form and replaced by the
following:

          the Executive shall continue to be covered at the expense of the
          Company by the same or equivalent hospital, medical, dental, accident,
          disability and life insurance coverage as in effect for the Executive
          immediately prior to his or her employment, until the earlier of (A)
          thirty-six (36) months following termination of employment, or (B) the
          date the Executive has commenced new employment and has thereby become
          eligible for comparable benefits.

     All other provisions of the Agreement shall, unless altered hereby, remain
in full force and effect.


<PAGE>   2


     WHEREFORE, in recognition and acceptance of this Amendment to the Severance
Agreement, the parties hereto have set their hands as of the first date written
above and upon which date this Amendment, when executed, shall be given effect.

                                    PEOPLES HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                    By:
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                    Attest:
                                           -------------------------------------

                                    Executive:
                                              ----------------------------------

                                    Address:
                                            ------------------------------------



                                       2
EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-39446) pertaining to the 1987 Incentive Stock Option and
Appreciation Plan, 1990 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and Options
Granted to Certain Officers, Directors, Consultants and Scientific Advisory
Board Members under Written Compensation Agreements; (Form S-8 No. 33-48044)
pertaining to Options Granted Certain Officers, Directors, Consultants and
Scientific Advisory Board Members under Written Compensation Agreements; (Form
S-8 No. 33-50156 and No. 33-82310) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option/Stock
Issuance Plan; (Form S-8 No. 333-36879) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive
Plan; (Form S-3 No. 33-55520, No. 33-61935, No. 333-08659 and No. 333-62955)
pertaining to the registration of shares of Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc.
Common Stock of our report dated January 29, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc., and our
report dated January 18, 1999, with respect to the combined financial statements
of the Dermagraft Joint Venture included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
March 26, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Partners XI 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000702986
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      969
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          29,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,896)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,406   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,270     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,331)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,406    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,084    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,883    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,454    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       227     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.68<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending August 16, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|CITY STATE BANK   | * 18C* Branch  | City State Bank, Ogden, Iowa, to merge with Ames Community Bank, Ames, Iowa, and Community Bank of Boone, Boone, Iowa, and thereby to establish branch offices at 217 West Mulberry Street, Ogden, Iowa, and 104 Chestnut, Ames, Iowa. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Mindy Lee Comstock, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-17-00346-CV

Trial court case number: 15-FD-3019

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

On May 12, 2017, relator, Mindy Lee Comstock, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s May 5, 2017 oral ruling granting 

the real party in interest’s motion to strike relator’s jury demand and to order respondent 

to conduct a jury trial in the underlying divorce proceeding.

With the petition, relator also filed an emergency motion for temporary relief 

seeking a stay of the respondent’s May 16, 2017 bench trial setting, pending disposition 

of this petition, with the required certificate of compliance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a). 

Accordingly, the Court grants the relator’s motion and ORDERS that the bench trial 

scheduled for May 16, 2017 is stayed. See id. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the 

mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or this Court otherwise orders the stay 

lifted. See id. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See id.

52.10(c).

Finally, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by any 

real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed 

within 10 days from the date of this order. See id. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 12, 2017
#### The State ex rel. Camargo, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Camargo v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 356.]

(No. 98-847

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided January 20, 1999.)

*Gallon & Takacs Co., L.P.A.,*and *Thomas J. Schaffer,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Reeve W. Kelsey,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., Elizabeth T. Smith*and *William W. Patmon III,*for appellee Mercy Hospital of Toledo.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

*357Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### Dennis Kennedy *et al., Appellants, v.*J. Cleveland Hall, *Respondent*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1790

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit tax-exempt financing

of certain transportation facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1995

Mr. HORN (for himself, Mr. TUCKER, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. BECERRA, Ms. HARMAN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. TORRES, and Ms. WATERS) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

tax-exempt financing of certain transportation facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING OF CERTAIN TRANS4 PORTATION FACILITIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 142 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exempt

7 facility bonds) is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para9 graph (3), and
2

•HR 1790 IH

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the follow2 ing new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) RELATED TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.—

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Transportation facili5 ties (including trackage and related rail facili6 ties, but not rolling stock) shall be treated as

7 facilities described in paragraph (2) of sub8 section (a) if at least 80 percent of the use of

9 the facilities (determined on an annual basis) is

10 to be in connection with the transport of cargo

11 to or from a facility described in such para12 graph (without regard to this paragraph).

13 ‘‘(B) GOVERNMENTAL OWNERSHIP RE14 QUIREMENT.—In the case of transportation fa15 cilities described in subparagraph (A), sub16 section (b)(1) shall apply without regard to sub17 paragraph (B)(ii) thereof.’’

18 (b) CHANGE IN USE.—Section 150(b) of the Internal

19 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to change in use of facili20 ties financed with tax-exempt private activity bonds) is

21 amended by adding at the end the following new para22 graph:

23 ‘‘(7) CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.—

24 In the case of any transportation facility—
3

•HR 1790 IH

1 ‘‘(A) with respect to which financing is

2 provided from the proceeds of any private activ3 ity bond which, when issued, purported to be a

4 tax-exempt bond described in paragraph (2) of

5 section 142(a) by reason of section 142(c)(2),

6 and

7 ‘‘(B) with respect to which the require8 ments of section 142(c)(2) are not met,

9 no deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for

10 interest on such financing which accrues during the

11 period beginning on the 1st day of the taxable year

12 in which such facility fails to meet such require13 ments and ending on the date such facility meets

14 such requirements.’’

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date

17 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       130
<INVENTORY>                                     54,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,239
<PP&E>                                         104,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,826
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,420
<SALES>                                         50,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,466
<CGS>                                           23,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,890
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>