alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

,

 Respondent

 v.

KARL BROWN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 596 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending July 25, 2009

|Filer                                                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|STATE BANK OF HAWLEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN & TRUST | * 3A3         | State Bank of Hawley Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Hawley, Minnesota, to acquire 51.92% of Bankshares of Hawley, Inc., Hawley, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire State Bank of Hawley, Hawley, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                                                 | Not available
|Federal Register:                                          | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location       | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMUNITY BK, RONAN, MONTANA | 685555 | 03/30/2009 | 07/16/2009     | O         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 64.37 Valve and fitting guard. Each valve and fitting must be protected from mechanical damage by— ( a ) The tank;
( b ) A tank saddle;
( c ) The framework; or
( d ) A guard.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 10, 1995 (63), Para 63.4 Party Affiliation]
[Page 655]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.63.4  party affiliation

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. WICKER, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                                Democratic Caucus,

                                U.S. House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 10, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to inform you that Representative 
     Nathan Deal is no longer a member of the Democratic Caucus.
           Sincerely,
                                                        Vic Fazio,
                                                         Chairman.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending May 30, 2009

|Filer                              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BARCLAYS BANK PLC                  | FBSEA          | Barclays Bank PLC, London, England, to establish an additional branch in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(2)(i)(A) of Regulation K.      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable 
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable
|CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE | FBSEA          | Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Toronto, Canada to establish an agency in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable 
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable
|The Warehouse Trust Company LLC    | Member         | The Warehouse Trust Company LLC, New York, New York, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                    | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending September 18, 2010

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|EASTERN BANK CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Eastern Bank Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts to acquire 100% of the voting shares of Wainwright Bank & Trust Company, Boston, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(3) of the BHC Act.                                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | Not available
|Sugar River Bancorp, MHC | * 3A1         | Application by Sugar River Bancorp, MHC, Newport, New Hampshire to become a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting shares of Sugar River Bank, Newport, New Hampshire, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/08/2010   
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | 10/08/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0461 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. NICOLE ABENICIA NOLI ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 8 , 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 29 2021

01/29/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0461
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Hattie Ulan,

Acting Board Secretary,

[FR Doc. 07-3027 Filed 6-14-07; 3:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
# C_2012194EN.01001201.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/12

---

Appeal brought on 18 April 2012 by Chafiq Ayadi against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2012 in Case T-527/09: Chafiq Ayadi v European Commission

(Case C-183/12 P)

2012/C 194/19

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Chafiq Ayadi (represented by: H.A.S. Miller, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Council of the European Union

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Appellant seeks the following order if successful on both pleas:

| — | the order of the General Court dated 31 January 2012 is quashed |
| --- | --- |

—

the order of the General Court dated 31 January 2012 is quashed

| — | it is declared that the action for annulment is not devoid of purpose |
| --- | --- |

—

it is declared that the action for annulment is not devoid of purpose

| — | the matter be remitted back to the General Court for it to determine the annulment application |
| --- | --- |

—

the matter be remitted back to the General Court for it to determine the annulment application

| — | The Commission do pay the costs of this appeal and the costs of defending the Commission's application to find the annulment action devoid of purpose before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Commission do pay the costs of this appeal and the costs of defending the Commission's application to find the annulment action devoid of purpose before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant raises the following two pleas in law:

| A. | The General Court erred when it failed to:






  (a) | hear from the Advocate-General and/or |
| --- | --- | --- |

A.

The General Court erred when it failed to:

(a)

hear from the Advocate-General and/or

| (b) | invite representations from the Appellant as to whether the oral procedure ought to be opened and/or |
| --- | --- |

(b)

invite representations from the Appellant as to whether the oral procedure ought to be opened and/or

| (c) | open the oral procedure on the question as to whether the application to annul was devoid of purpose. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

open the oral procedure on the question as to whether the application to annul was devoid of purpose.

| B. | The General Court erred in finding that the action for annulment was not capable of conferring material advantage upon the Appellant. |
| --- | --- |

B.

The General Court erred in finding that the action for annulment was not capable of conferring material advantage upon the Appellant.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                    462
<SECURITIES>                                            2,235
<RECEIVABLES>                                             184
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             1,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        4,087
<PP&E>                                                  1,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                            651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,121
<BONDS>                                                 1,733
<COMMON>                                                   43
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,662
<SALES>                                                 2,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,278
<CGS>                                                   2,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           2,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           299
<INCOME-TAX>                                              102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       197
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000827164
<NAME> EXHIBITRONIX, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,232
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,428
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1132.1 Protest against collective ratemaking actions. ( a ) *Content.* The protested collective ratemaking action sought to be suspended, whether or not contained in a tariff filed with the Board, should be identified by making reference to: The name of the publishing carrier or collective ratemaking organization; the identification of the tariff, if applicable, or the identification of the collective ratemaking action publication if it is not contained in a tariff filed with the Board; the specific items or particular provisions protested; and the effective date of the tariff or other collective ratemaking action publication. Reference should also be made to the tariff or collective ratemaking action, and the specific provisions proposed to be superseded. The protest should state the grounds in support thereof, and indicate in what respect the protested collective ratemaking action is considered to be unlawful. Such protests will be considered as addressed to the discretion of the Board. Should a protestant desire to proceed further against a collective ratemaking action which is not suspended, or which has been suspended and the suspension vacated, a separate later formal complaint or petition should be filed.
( b ) *When filed.* Protests against, and requests for suspension of, collective ratemaking actions will not be considered unless made in writing and filed with the Board at Washington, DC. If the protestant desires action by the Board before the effective date of the collective action, protests and requests for suspension shall reach the Board at least 12 days (except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section) before such effective date. If the protested collective ratemaking action is already in effect, or if the protestant does not desire action before its effective date, protests and requests for suspension can be filed at any time.
( c ) *Copies; service.* Every protest or reply filed under this section should be directed to the attention of the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of Proceedings, Surface Transportation Board. One copy of each protest or reply filed under this section simultaneously must be served upon the publishing carrier or collective ratemaking organization, and upon other persons known by protestant to be interested.
( d ) *Reply to protest.* A reply to a protest filed at least 12 days before the effective date of proposed collective action provisions must reach the Board not later than the fourth working day prior to the scheduled effective date of the protested provisions unless otherwise provided.
[62 FR 50885, Sept. 29, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 52908, Oct. 15, 2009; 84 FR 12944, Apr. 3, 2019]
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Inuvo, Inc., formerly known as Think Partnership Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 4) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gail L. Babitt, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: September 25, 2009

| |                                                                                    
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Gail L. Babitt                                                                 
| | Gail L. Babitt, Chief Financial Officer, principal
financial and accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
98-1494.

#### Pingue v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 96-P-263. On motion for oral argument. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.