*all results reported as moisture free

*all results pooled from all 7 samples

Average Low High Low High Low High

Metals (mg/kg)

0.36 0.17 0.59 0.6 n.d. 70 (2), (4) n.d. 26 (2)

23.17 1.95 65.70 61.4 n.d. 2200 (2), (4) n.d. 298 (2)

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 206 (2) n.d. 32 (2), (3)

0.16 0.13 0.25 0.3 n.d. 160 (2) n.d. 17 (2)

27.40 3.01 73.20 70.2 n.d. 200 (2) n.d. 340 (2)

0.62 0.38 1.52 1.52*** n.d. 180 (2) n.d. 213 (2)

33.10 8.78 96.80 85.9** n.d. 1900 (2) n.d. 340 (2)

59.14 38.60 156.00 156*** n.d. 2500 (2) n.d. 15800 (2)

0.03 0.02 0.05 0.0 n.d. 63 (2) n.d. 1.1 (2)

2.11 1.06 5.05 4.27** n.d. 730 (2), (4) n.d. 540 (2)

0.28 0.27 0.31 0.31*** n.d. 150 (2) n.d. 66 (2), (3)

112.79 45.17 302.06 294.3 n.d. 6086 n.d. 17249

146.35 54.37 399.47 380.5 n.d. 8359 n.d. 17673.1

Halides

6.14 6.00 7.00 7*** 0.04 160 (4)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

102.14 90 130 125.6 n.d. 9080 (2) n.d. 5400 (2)

16.57 5 25 25*** n.d. 4900 (2), (4) n.d. 490 (2), (3)

Total Halides (mg/kg) 124.86 101.00 162.00 158 0.04 14140 0 5890

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ n.d. 38000 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

9.1 7.1 13.5 12.11** 700 5400 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

31329 9300 110000 76060**

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1600 27000 (2)

31.0 25.4 35.8 37.2*

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

24.7 18.6 41.7 41.7***

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

13.0 10.0 26.0 26***

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4000 28000 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

131.23 80.60 179.00 176.7*

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

36.9 21.7 49.4 53.06* 1000 26000 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

193.71 144.00 221.00 237* 8600 56000 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

Total Volatile Compounds (  g/kg) 31768 9607 110566 76644 14300 153400 1600 27000 

# Minnesota C&D 1

Cobalt (HAP) Chromium (HAP) 

## Coal Wood/Biomass

Range 90% UPL

Results* Range

Reference Range

Bromine (mg/kg) Lead (HAP)

Manganese (HAP)

Mercury (HAP)

Nickel (HAP)

Selenium (HAP)

Total Low Volatile Metals (mg/kg) 5

Total Metals (mg/kg) Reference

Antimony (HAP)

Arsenic (HAP)

Beryllium (HAP)

Cadmium (HAP)

Ethyl benzene (HAP)

Formaldehyde (HAP)

Methylene chloride (HAP/OH)

m,p

‐ Xylenes (HAP)

o

‐ Xylenes (HAP)

Total Xylenes

Naphthalene (PAH)

Styrene (HAP)

Toluene (HAP) Chlorine (mg/kg)

Fluorine (mg/kg)

Volatile Compounds (  g/kg)

Benzene (HAP)

Minnesota example comparison 1out of 275 Total Volatile Compounds (  g/kg) 31768 9607 110566 76644 14300 153400 1600 27000

Semi

‐ Volatile Compounds (  g/kg)

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

8743 8240 8970 8970****

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

9727 4450 15200 15200***

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

Total Semi

‐ Volatile Compounds (  g/kg) 18469 12690 24170 24170

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

NA NA NA NA 6000 253000 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

NA NA NA NA 14000 2090000 (2)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (  g/kg)

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 14000 2090000

‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

Total Organic HAPs (mg/kg) 

### 50 22 135 101 28 2243.4 1.6 27.0

* All 90% UPL Results reported as Normal ** 90% UPL Result reported as Lognormal

*** 90% UPL Result Non

‐ Parametric **** Maximum Value Used, Sample Size Too Small For Statistical Analysi s

n.d.

= Non

‐ Detect '

‐‐ = No Dat a

NA

‐ Not applicable; PAH's accounted for in testing of Volatile Compounds and Semi

‐ Volatile Compound s

Resources:

1: Sample Results from C&D Processing Facility in Minnesota. Facility is a member of CMRA.

2: EPA Letter "Contaminant Concentrations in Traditional Fuels: Tables for Comparison." November 29, 2011

.

3: EPA Letter to Joseph Knapik

‐ International Paper Products Corporation. October 5, 2011

.

4: USGS Coal Database; http://energy.er.usgs.gov/coalqual.htm (all data based on coal from U.S. )

5: Low Volatile Metals as defined in 40 CFR 63.1219(e)(4) Anthracene (PAH) Acenaphthene (PAH)

Acenaphthylene (PAH)

Benzo(k)fluoranthene (PAH)

Chrysene (PAH)

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (PAH)

Fluoranthene (PAH) Benzo(a)anthracene (PAH)

Benzo(a)pyrene (PAH)

Benzo(b)fluoranthene (PAH)

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (PAH)

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (  g/kg)

16

‐ PAH

PAH (52 extractable

‐ includes previous 16) Fluorene (PAH)

Indeno(1,2,3

‐ cd)pyrene (PAH)

Phenanthrene (PAH)

Pentachlorophenol 6 Pyrene (PAH)

Phenol (HAP)

Minnesota example comparison 1out of 275*allresultsreportedasmoisturefree*allresultspooledfromall7samplesMDLNon‐Detect AverageStandardDeviationLow HighComponentsasreceived Moist.Free asreceived Moist.Free asreceived Moist.Free asreceived Moist.Free asreceived Moist.Free asreceived Moist.Free asreceived Moist.Free‐‐0 13.80 1.09 12.05 15.2 15.47‐‐0.56 0.64 0.56 0.65 0.59 0.7 0.58 0.68 0.6 0.7 0.54 0.63 0.45 0.52 0 0.65 0.06 0.52 0.7 0.741‐‐71.45 81.24 70.08 80.57 68.59 80.89 69.24 81.37 69.96 81.44 69.98 81.24 70.31 81.24 0 81.14 0.31 80.57 81.44 81.61‐‐15.95 18.13 16.34 18.78 15.62 18.42 15.28 17.96 15.34 17.85 15.62 18.13 15.78 18.24 0 18.22 0.31 17.85 18.78 18.69‐‐0 6.00 0.05 5.95 6.12 6.12***‐‐0 50.51 0.16 50.20 50.72 50.75‐‐0 0.23 0.03 0.19 0.29 0.28‐‐0 42.60 0.23 42.36 43.08 43.08***‐‐0 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.021 0.022‐‐7602 8644 7179 8254 7142 8423 7338 8624 7408 8624 6919 8033 7620 8805 0 8487 267 8033 8805 8898Metals(mg/kg)0.080 0.36 0.15 0.17 0.59 0.580.120 23.17 24.87 1.95 65.7 61.440.0080 0.008 0.000 0.008 0.008 n.d.0.0070 0.16 0.04 0.13 0.25 0.30.020 27.40 27.83 3.01 73.2 70.240.040 0.62 0.41 0.38 1.52 1.52***0.130 33.10 30.47 8.8 96.8 85.9**0.0090 59.14 43.10 38.6 156 156***0.0030 0.03 0.01 0.015 0.049 0.0480.040 2.11 1.41 1.06 5.05 4.27**0.270 0.28 0.02 0.27 0.31 0.31***TotalMetals(mg/kg)‐‐‐‐146.36 97.7 75.18 295.95 295.9***Formaldehyde(g/kg)4200 31328.57 35510.88 9300 110000 76060**Ions60 6.14 0.38 6 7 7***400 102.14 15.24 90 130 125.660 16.57 10.21 5 25 25***TotalHalogens(mg/kg)‐‐‐‐124.86 24.07 101.00 161.00 161.9VolatileCompounds(g/kg)var0 4.5 0.1 4.43 4.61 4.61***var0 7.7 0.2 7.50 7.81 7.81***var0 2.6 0.1 2.50 2.6 2.6***var0 2.0 0.0 1.93 2 2***var0 61.0 1.2 59.7 62 62***var0 135.9 2.7 133 138 138***var0 51.1 1.1 50.0 52.0 52***var0 7.1 0.1 6.9 7.2 7.2***var0 3.4 0.1 3.270 3.410 3.41***var0 6.7 0.1 6.54 6.81 6.81***var0 2.8 0.1 2.70 2.81 2.81***var0 3.5 0.1 3.47 3.6 3.6***var0 4.5 0.1 4.43 4.61 4.61***var0 9.1 2.1 7.12 13.5 12.11**var0 4.5 0.1 4.43 4.61 4.61***var0 2.8 0.1 2.70 2.81 2.81***var0 24.7 7.7 18.60 41.7 41.7***var0 7.7 0.2 7.50 7.81 7.81***var0 5.1 0.1 5.00 5.2 5.2***var0 31.0 4.0 25.4 35.8 37.2var0 131.2 29.5 80.60 179 176.7var0 6.3 0.1 6.16 6.4 6.4***var0 13.0 5.8 10.00 26 26***var0 36.9 10.5 21.7 49.4 53.06var0 4.9 0.1 4.8 5 5***var0 193.7 28.1 144.0 221.0 237var0 5.1 0.1 5.00 5.2 5.2***TotalVolatileCompounds(g/kg)‐‐‐‐768.74 48.8 697.49 827.7 843.8Semi‐VolatileCompounds(g/kg)var0 5681.4 83.0 5560 5730 5730***var0 3698.6 53.7 3620 3730 3730***var0 5958.6 87.8 5830 6010 6010***var0 5144.3 78.1 5030 5190 5190***var0 4512.9 63.4 4420 4550 4550***var0 2080.0 34.2 2030 2100 2100***var0 3698.6 53.7 3620 3730 3730***var0 5324.3 78.1 5210 5370 5370***var0 7667.1 107.3 7510 7730 7730***var0 5057.1 73.2 4950 5100 5100***var0 4780.0 68.3 4680 4820 4820***var0 4257.1 48.6 4150 4280 4280***var0 4152.9 63.4 4060 4190 4190***var0 7217.1 107.3 7060 7280 7280***var0 3878.6 53.7 3800 3910 3910***var0 4242.9 63.4 4150 4280 4280***var0 3341.4 48.8 3270 3370 3370***var0 2350.0 34.2 2300 2370 2370***var0 4690.0 68.3 4590 4730 4730***var0 5324.3 78.1 5210 5370 5370***var0 3698.6 53.7 3620 3730 3730***var0 3975.7 58.6 3890 4010 4010***var0 4022.9 157.7 3680 4100 4100***var0 4152.9 63.4 4060 4190 4190***var0 4152.9 63.4 4060 4190 4190***var0 4780.0 68.3 4680 4820 4820***var0 4332.9 63.4 4240 4370 4370***var0 4242.9 63.4 4150 4280 4280***var0 4332.9 63.4 4240 4370 4370***var0 4960.0 68.3 4860 5000 5000***var0 3071.4 48.8 3000 3100 3100***var0 2797.1 39.0 2740 2820 2820***var0 3698.6 53.7 3620 3730 3730***var0 4422.9 63.4 4330 4460 4460***var0 3521.4 48.8 3450 3550 3550***var0 25050.0 48114.3 3190 134000 8970 var0 3788.6 53.7 3710 3820 3820** *var0 8935.7 5062.5 4190 15200 15200***var0 4152.9 63.4 4060 4190 4190***TotalSemi‐VolatileCompounds(g/kg)‐‐‐‐185767 45561 160490 288010 288010 All90%UPLResultsreportedasNormal MRL=MethodReportingLimit** 90%UPLResultreportedasLognormal MDL=MethodDetectionLimit =Nondetect;ReportedasMDL***90%UPLResultNon‐Parametric HAP=HazardousAirPollutant ****OutliervalueofPentachlorophenolnotincluded.Outliermorethan392timesthestandarddeviationofremainingvalues.‐‐=Non‐Detect OH=OrganicHalogenn.d.=Only1DistinctValue,thereforenovariance. N=Nitrogenated1707000.018288010827.7 760.7 780.2 697.5 788.5 813.7 712.93730 3730 37307730167440160750 160490 175730401041908240281.22100 20303730 3620519020.630006010391077306.16519037307280 728090%UPLResults*7.52.527.51.9359.750.560.2542.414.6113.5Thursday8/16Wednesday8/15(b)Wednesday8/15(a)4.618.223.67.817.817.214.114.910.00950.7242.364.618.45.982.814.617.816.812.813.62.813.60.02150.5342.570.0087.812.62624.611.3186.1362051444.8113.872100 20306.542.73.65.99 5.9587.30.01450.20.2343.0842.6295.94.431336.934.433.4713.452.741.74.432621.753.270.276251301100000.4350.41561772506010 583089405650371038204370152005190 5030134000406077304550373041904240Friday8/1750266.1640604010 38903550 34504330300044604680274048603730 3620500028204100 36804370 4240468044205210751049503620537046803620406075105210482036203270442042503370 32702300537021004010201512.05 13.03 15.26.12 6 5.9950.570.250.548205100 5100510018.67.814.812.822.17.54060 419060.223450310051003910 391053704839.21665.25.25.231.66.410.677304.6154.61362037302820419037304190 41904820 4820897088203190 3190355031004190 41904460446043704370419041903550 35503730401041904460482041003820 3820 382035503100 3100 310041004190437043702820 282040104820 4820 48204100 41004370 4370 4370537023702370 23705370 537041903730 373044504950428013800 5360 1390038203370 3370 3370371041904280 4280 4280 4280391043304190 4190 4190 41903370473037305.233.24.612.816.410.222152.81534.6 30.25.214049.4510.441.76.166.411.812525.428.25730 573044604.81560105.221521002820373029.8021007280473012.3052072.8121.77.5524.67.815.22.735.81.9359.7138138 13352133504.617.812.6262138621382.66.812.813.413.4152 528.279.24.433.67.26.547.24.618.86.817.23.416.816.933.27 3.417.124.434.43141.0 125.07.813.474.432.814.614.432.62622.76.933.276.542.73.477.57.552 502.52.525669060.27 0.3169060.270.27711018000955106.3 92.5 75.20.3896.841.50.04934.644.139.40.460.04 0.0320.4141.355.312.50.0170.5965.70.008 0.0080.3716.90.410.2973.20.14140.133.010.180.190.0150.01842.580.010.3511.2 13.821.20.00850.480.024.10.008161.00.0080.140.0080.1460.138.60.13101.05.051.35 1.060.418.780.0270.01515.739.11.5222Manganese(HAP)Chlorine(mg/kg)Fluorine(mg/kg)MinnesotaC&DSUMMARY16.20.620.5116000 170002.340.29 0.272.44Tuesday8/14Monday8/13 Wednesday8/150.182.2142.570.230.25Range0.171.95o‐Xylenes(HAP)Chloroform(HAP/OH)9300Bromine(mg/kg)1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane(HAP/OH)Mercury(HAP)Nickel(HAP)Selenium(HAP)142.0 102.01.9359.74.43241.2611015000256904.6134000102.0n‐Hexane(HAP)1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene(HAP/OH)Styrene(HAP)Tetrachloroethylene(HAP/OH)Toluene(HAP)Chlorobenzene(HAP/OH)Moisture(wt%)Ash(wt%)VolatileMatter(wt%)FixedCarbon(wt%)HeatingValue(BTU/lb)Antimony(HAP)Hydrogen(wt%)Carbon(wt%)Nitrogen(wt%)Oxygen(wt%)Cadmium(HAP)Chromium(HAP)Cobalt(HAP)Lead(HAP)VinylchlorideNaphthalene(HAP)Methyltertbutylether(HAP)Methylenechloride(HAP/OH)2,4‐Dinitrotoluene(HAP/N)2‐Methylnaphthalene2,4,6‐Trichlorophenol(HAP/OH)2,4‐Dinitrophenol(HAP/N)Sulfur(wt%)Nitrobenzene(HAP/N)1,4‐Dichlorobenzene(HAP/OH)Isopropylbenzene(HAP)m,p‐Xylenes(HAP)Methylmethacrylate(HAP)HexachloroethaneFluoreneFluoranthene1‐Methylnaphthalene2,4,5‐Trichlorophenol(HAP/OH)ChryseneDibenz(a,h)anthraceneBenzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneArsenic(HAP)Beryllium(HAP)Hexachlorobutadiene(HAP/OH)Formaldehyde4550556060104550503058303730 3730 37305730 556080.6 140 136 1186.4105.22025730PyrenePhenolPhenanthreneIndeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyreneNaphthalene(HAP)AcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAcetophenoneAnilinePentachlorophenol(HAP/OH)Biphenyl(HAP)Bis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate(HAP)Benzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzo(k)fluorantheneDibenzofurans(D/F)Dimethylphthalate(HAP)Hexachlorobenzene(HAP/OH)Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(HAP/OH)Hexachlorobutadiene(HAP/OH)41904150 42804680 482037304060237041903980406038904150406047302370521070604150 4280 41507060380045903800728039105210 537042804370 42404280537023004150Benzene(HAP)Bromoform(HAP/OH)Acrolein(HAP)Acrylonitrile(HAP/N)Allylchloride(HAP/OH)1,1,2‐Trichloroethane(HAP/OH)4190Acetonitrile(HAP/N)473072804280 4280 4280Anthracene1793,3‐Dichlorobenzidene(HAP/OH/N)4‐Nitrophenol(HAP/N)57305370 5370455051001,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene(HAP/OH)1,4‐Dichlorobenzene(p)(HAP/OH)3730 36205000 5000 5000 5000 48602740Chloroprene(HAP/OH)Ethylbenzene(HAP)48204280 4280 42804730 4590424040607730601045505190 51903730MinnesotaC&DSummaryTable2outof275MinnesotaC&DSummaryTable3outof275Moisture (wt%) Ash (wt%) Volatile Matter (wt%) Fixed Carbon (wt%) Hydrogen (wt%) Carbon (wt%) Nitrogen (wt%) Oxygen (wt%) Sulfur (wt%) Heating Value (BTU/lb)

12.05 0.64 81.24 18.13 6.12 50.56 0.25 42.41 0.018 8644

13.03 0.65 80.57 18.78 6 50.57 0.2 42.58 0.01 8254

15.2 0.7 80.89 18.42 5.99 50.5 0.22 42.57 0.015 8423

14.91 0.68 81.37 17.96 6 50.72 0.23 42.36 0.009 8624

14.1 0.7 81.44 17.85 5.98 50.53 0.19 42.57 0.021 8624

13.87 0.63 81.24 18.13 5.99 50.48 0.29 42.6 0.014 8033

13.45 0.52 81.24 18.24 5.95 50.2 0.23 43.08 0.018 8805

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 4Antimony (HAP) Arsenic (HAP) Beryllium (HAP) Cadmium (HAP) Chromium (HAP) Cobalt (HAP) Lead (HAP) Manganese (HAP) Mercury (HAP) Nickel (HAP)

0.59 65.7 0.008 0.25 73.2 0.38 96.8 41.5 0.049 2.44

0.18 2.21 0.008 0.18 4.1 0.41 41.3 55.3 0.04 2.34

0.37 16.9 0.008 0.14 21.2 0.46 12.5 39.4 0.017 1.2

0.17 1.95 0.008 0.13 3.01 0.51 34.6 44.1 0.032 1.31

0.41 11.2 0.008 0.14 14 0.41 8.78 38.6 0.015 1.35

0.35 13.8 0.008 0.13 16.2 0.62 15.7 39.1 0.02 1.06

0.43 50.4 0.008 0.14 60.1 1.52 22 156 0.027 5.05

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 5Selenium (HAP) Formaldehyde Bromine (mg/kg) Chlorine (mg/kg) Fluorine (mg/kg) 1,1,2,2

‐ Tetrachloroethane (HAP/OH) 1,1,2

‐ Trichloroethane (HAP/OH)

0.29 15000 6 110 25 4.61 7.81

0.27 34000 6 95 24 4.43 7.5

0.27 18000 6 90 5 4.43 7.5

0.27 16000 7 110 25 4.61 7.81

0.27 17000 6 90 6 4.61 7.81

0.31 9300 6 90 6 4.61 7.81

0.27 110000 6 130 25 4.43 7.5

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 61,2,4

‐ Trichlorobenzene (HAP/OH) 1,4

‐ Dichlorobenzene(p) (HAP/OH) Acetonitrile (HAP/N) Acrolein (HAP) Acrylonitrile (HAP/N) Allyl chloride (HAP/OH) Benzene (HAP)

2.6 2 62 138 52 7.2 3.41

2.5 1.93 59.7 133 50 6.93 3.27

2.5 1.93 59.7 133 50 6.93 3.27

2.6 2 62 138 52 7.2 3.41

2.6 2 62 138 52 7.2 3.41

2.6 2 62 138 52 7.2 3.41

2.5 1.93 59.7 133 50 6.93 3.27

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 7Bromoform (HAP/OH) Chlorobenzene (HAP/OH) Chloroform (HAP/OH) Chloroprene (HAP/OH) Ethyl benzene (HAP) Hexachlorobutadiene (HAP/OH)

6.81 2.81 3.6 4.61 9.2 4.61

6.54 2.7 3.47 4.43 7.12 4.43

6.54 2.7 3.47 4.43 8.27 4.43

6.81 2.81 3.6 4.61 8.2 4.61

6.81 2.81 3.6 4.61 8.4 4.61

6.81 2.81 3.6 4.61 8.8 4.61

6.54 2.7 3.47 4.43 13.5 4.43

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 8Isopropylbenzene (HAP) m,p

‐ Xylenes (HAP) Methyl methacrylate (HAP) Methyl tert butyl ether (HAP) Methylene chloride (HAP/OH) Naphthalene (HAP)

2.81 24.6 7.81 5.2 25.4 179

2.7 21.7 7.5 5 35.8 125

2.8 22.1 7.5 5 34.6 140

2.81 18.6 7.81 5.2 30.2 80.6

2.81 20.6 7.81 5.2 33.2 140

2.81 23.6 7.81 5.2 31.6 136

2.7 41.7 7.5 5 26 118

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 9n

‐ Hexane (HAP) o

‐ Xylenes (HAP) Styrene (HAP) Tetrachloroethylene (HAP/OH) Toluene (HAP) Vinyl chloride 1,2,4

‐ Trichlorobenzene (HAP/OH)

6.4 11.8 28.2 5 215 5.2 5730

6.16 12.3 29.8 4.81 207 5 5730

6.16 10.4 41.7 4.81 201 5 5730

6.4 10 49.4 5 166 5.2 5730

6.4 10.6 39.2 5 202 5.2 5560

6.4 10.2 48 5 221 5.2 5730

6.16 26 21.7 4.81 144 5 5560

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 101,4

‐ Dichlorobenzene (HAP/OH) 1

‐ Methylnaphthalene 2,4,5

‐ Trichlorophenol (HAP/OH) 2,4,6

‐ Trichlorophenol (HAP/OH) 2,4

‐ Dinitrophenol (HAP/N)

3730 6010 5190 4550 2100

3730 6010 5190 4550 2100

3730 6010 5190 4550 2100

3730 6010 5190 4550 2100

3620 5830 5030 4420 2030

3730 6010 5190 4550 2100

3620 5830 5030 4420 2030

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 112,4

‐ Dinitrotoluene (HAP/N) 2

‐ Methylnaphthalene 3,3

‐ Dichlorobenzidene (HAP/OH/N) 4

‐ Nitrophenol (HAP/N) Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Acetophenone Aniline

3730 5370 7730 5100 4820 4280 4190 7280

3730 5370 7730 5100 4820 4280 4190 7280

3730 5370 7730 5100 4820 4280 4190 7280

3730 5370 7730 5100 4820 4280 4190 7280

3620 5210 7510 4950 4680 4150 4060 7060

3730 5370 7730 5100 4820 4280 4190 7280

3620 5210 7510 4950 4680 4250 4060 7060

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 12Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Biphenyl (HAP) Bis(2

‐ ethylhexyl)phthalate (HAP)

3910 4280 3370 2370 4730 5370 3730 4010

3910 4280 3370 2370 4730 5370 3730 4010

3910 4280 3370 2370 4730 5370 3730 4010

3910 4280 3370 2370 4730 5370 3730 4010

3800 4150 3270 2300 4590 5210 3620 3890

3910 4280 3370 2370 4730 5370 3730 4010

3800 4150 3270 2300 4590 5210 3620 3890

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 13Chrysene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofurans (D/F) Dimethyl phthalate (HAP) Fluoranthene Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene (HAP/OH) Hexachlorobutadiene (HAP/OH)

4100 4190 4190 4820 4370 4280 4370 5000

4100 4190 4190 4820 4370 4280 4370 5000

4100 4190 4190 4820 4370 4280 4370 5000

4100 4190 4190 4820 4370 4280 4370 5000

3980 4060 4060 4680 4240 4150 4240 4860

4100 4190 4190 4820 4370 4280 4370 5000

3680 4060 4060 4680 4240 4150 4240 4860

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 14Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HAP/OH) Hexachloroethane Indeno(1,2,3

‐ cd)pyrene Naphthalene (HAP) Nitrobenzene (HAP/N) Pentachlorophenol (HAP/OH)

3100 2820 3730 4460 3550 3190

3100 2820 3730 4460 3550 3190

3100 2820 3730 4460 3550 8820

3100 2820 3730 4460 3550 8970

3000 2740 3620 4330 3450 8240

3100 2820 3730 4460 3550 8940

3000 2740 3620 4330 3450 134000

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 15Phenanthrene Phenol Pyrene Total Metals Total Halogens Total VOC Total SVOC

3820 4450 4190 281.207 141 827.69 160750

3820 4190 4190 106.338 125 760.72 160490

3820 13800 4190 92.465 101 780.17 175730

3820 5360 4190 86.09 142 697.49 167440

3710 13900 4060 75.183 102 788.49 170700

3820 15200 4190 87.298 102 813.69 177250

3710 5650 4060 295.945 161 712.9 288010

Minnesota ProUCL Entry 16Moisture

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 12.05 Minimum 2.489

Maximum 15.2 Maximum 2.721

Second Largest 14.91 Second Largest 2.702

First Quartile 13.24 First Quartile 2.583

Median 13.87 Median 2.63

Third Quartile 14.51 Third Quartile 2.674

Mean 13.8 Mean 2.622

SD 1.085 SD 0.0797

Coefficient of Variation 0.0786

Skewness

‐ 0.32

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.975 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.97

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 16.33 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 16.58

90% UPL (t) 15.47 90% UPL (t) 15.56

90% Percentile (z) 15.19 90% Percentile (z) 15.24

95% Percentile (z) 15.59 95% Percentile (z) 15.69

99% Percentile (z) 16.33 99% Percentile (z) 16.57

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 106.1 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.13

MLE of Mean 13.8

MLE of Standard Deviation 1.34

nu sta r 1486

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.182 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 15.03

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.148 95% Percentile 15.11

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 15.18

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 15.2

Minnesota UPL Results 1790% Percentile 15.54 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 15.2

95% Percentile 16.08 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 15.2

99% Percentile 17.11 90% UPL 15.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 17.28

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 15.53 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 16.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 15.54

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 16.49

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 16.51

Ash

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.52 Minimum

‐ 0.654

Maximum 0.7 Maximum

‐ 0.357

Second Largest 0.7 Second Largest

‐ 0.357

First Quartile 0.635 First Quartile

‐ 0.454

Median 0.65 Median

‐ 0.431

Third Quartile 0.69 Third Quartile

‐ 0.371

Mean 0.646 Mean

‐ 0.442

SD 0.0621 SD 0.103

Coefficient of Variation 0.0962

Skewness

‐ 1.585

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.834 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.806

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.791 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.817

90% UPL (t) 0.741 90% UPL (t) 0.753

90% Percentile (z) 0.725 90% Percentile (z) 0.733

95% Percentile (z) 0.748 95% Percentile (z) 0.761

99% Percentile (z) 0.79 99% Percentile (z) 0.816

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 66.29 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00974

MLE of Mean 0.646

Minnesota UPL Results 18MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0793

nu sta r 928.1

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.598 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 0.7

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.265 95% Percentile 0.7

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 0.7

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.7

90% Percentile 0.749 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.7

95% Percentile 0.781 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.7

99% Percentile 0.844 90% UPL 0.7

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.845

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.749 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.773

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.75

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.807

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.809

Volatile Matter

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 5

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 80.57 Minimum 4.389

Maximum 81.44 Maximum 4.4

Second Largest 81.37 Second Largest 4.399

First Quartile 81.07 First Quartile 4.395

Median 81.24 Median 4.397

Third Quartile 81.31 Third Quartile 4.398

Mean 81.14 Mean 4.396

SD 0.306 SD 0.00377

Coefficient of Variation 0.00377

Skewness

‐ 1.317

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.844 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.844

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

Minnesota UPL Results 1990% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.85 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.86

90% UPL (t) 81.61 90% UPL (t) 81.61

90% Percentile (z) 81.53 90% Percentile (z) 81.53

95% Percentile (z) 81.64 95% Percentile (z) 81.65

99% Percentile (z) 81.85 99% Percentile (z) 81.86

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 46893 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00173

MLE of Mean 81.14

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.375

nu sta r 656499

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.858 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 81.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.351 95% Percentile 81.42

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 81.44

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.44

90% Percentile 81.62 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.44

95% Percentile 81.76 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.44

99% Percentile 82.02 90% UPL 81.44

90% Chebyshev UP L 82.12

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 81.61 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 81.67

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 81.61

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 81.86

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 81.86

Fixed Carbon

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 17.85 Minimum 2.882

Maximum 18.78 Maximum 2.933

Second Largest 18.42 Second Largest 2.913

First Quartile 18.05 First Quartile 2.893

Median 18.13 Median 2.898

Third Quartile 18.33 Third Quartile 2.909

Mean 18.22 Mean 2.902

SD 0.309 SD 0.0169

Coefficient of Variation 0.017

Skewness 0.955

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

Minnesota UPL Results 20The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.939 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.942

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 18.94 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 18.95

90% UPL (t) 18.69 90% UPL (t) 18.69

90% Percentile (z) 18.61 90% Percentile (z) 18.61

95% Percentile (z) 18.72 95% Percentile (z) 18.73

99% Percentile (z) 18.94 99% Percentile (z) 18.94

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2327 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00783

MLE of Mean 18.22

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.378

nu sta r 32584

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.317 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 18.56

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.218 95% Percentile 18.67

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 18.76

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 18.78

90% Percentile 18.7 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 18.78

95% Percentile 18.84 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 18.78

99% Percentile 19.11 90% UPL 18.78

90% Chebyshev UP L 19.21

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 18.69 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 18.76

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 18.69

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 18.94

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 18.94

Hydrogen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 5

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5.95 Minimum 1.783

Maximum 6.12 Maximum 1.812

Second Largest 6 Second Largest 1.792

First Quartile 5.985 First Quartile 1.789

Median 5.99 Median 1.79

Third Quartile 6 Third Quartile 1.792

Mean 6.004 Mean 1.792

SD 0.0538 SD 0.0089

Coefficient of Variation 0.00896

Skewness 2.051

Minnesota UPL Results 21Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.741 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.743

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13

90% UPL (t) 6.087 90% UPL (t) 6.087

90% Percentile (z) 6.073 90% Percentile (z) 6.073

95% Percentile (z) 6.093 95% Percentile (z) 6.093

99% Percentile (z) 6.129 99% Percentile (z) 6.13

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 8374 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 7.17E

‐ 04

MLE of Mean 6.004

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0656

nu sta r 117230

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.209 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6.048

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.57 95% Percentile 6.084

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6.113

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.12

90% Percentile 6.089 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 6.12

95% Percentile 6.113 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 6.048

99% Percentile 6.158 90% UPL 6.12

90% Chebyshev UP L 6.177

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.087 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6.023

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.087

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13

Carbon

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 50.2 Minimum 3.916

Minnesota UPL Results 22Maximum 50.72 Maximum 3.926

Second Largest 50.57 Second Largest 3.923

First Quartile 50.49 First Quartile 3.922

Median 50.53 Median 3.923

Third Quartile 50.57 Third Quartile 3.923

Mean 50.51 Mean 3.922

SD 0.157 SD 0.00311

Coefficient of Variation 0.00311

Skewness

‐ 1.183

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.877 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.876

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 50.87 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 50.88

90% UPL (t) 50.75 90% UPL (t) 50.75

90% Percentile (z) 50.71 90% Percentile (z) 50.71

95% Percentile (z) 50.77 95% Percentile (z) 50.77

99% Percentile (z) 50.87 99% Percentile (z) 50.88

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 68974 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 7.32E

‐ 04

MLE of Mean 50.51

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.192

nu sta r 965640

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.862 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 50.63

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.315 95% Percentile 50.68

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 50.71

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 50.72

90% Percentile 50.76 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 50.72

95% Percentile 50.83 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 50.72

99% Percentile 50.96 90% UPL 50.72

90% Chebyshev UP L 51.01

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 50.75 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 50.68

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 50.75

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 50.88

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 50.88

Minnesota UPL Results 23Nitrogen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.19 Minimum

‐ 1.661

Maximum 0.29 Maximum

‐ 1.238

Second Largest 0.25 Second Largest

‐ 1.386

First Quartile 0.21 First Quartile

‐ 1.562

Median 0.23 Median

‐ 1.47

Third Quartile 0.24 Third Quartile

‐ 1.428

Mean 0.23 Mean

‐ 1.478

SD 0.0332 SD 0.14

Coefficient of Variation 0.144

Skewness 0.844

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.943 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.963

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.307 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.316

90% UPL (t) 0.281 90% UPL (t) 0.283

90% Percentile (z) 0.273 90% Percentile (z) 0.273

95% Percentile (z) 0.285 95% Percentile (z) 0.287

99% Percentile (z) 0.307 99% Percentile (z) 0.316

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 33.48 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00687

MLE of Mean 0.23

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0398

nu sta r 468.7

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.242 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 0.266

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.197 95% Percentile 0.278

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 0.288

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 24Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.29

90% Percentile 0.282 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.29

95% Percentile 0.299 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.29

99% Percentile 0.332 90% UPL 0.29

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.336

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.282 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.285

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.282

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.313

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.314

Oxygen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 42.36 Minimum 3.746

Maximum 43.08 Maximum 3.763

Second Largest 42.6 Second Largest 3.752

First Quartile 42.49 First Quartile 3.749

Median 42.57 Median 3.751

Third Quartile 42.59 Third Quartile 3.752

Mean 42.6 Mean 3.752

SD 0.233 SD 0.00546

Coefficient of Variation 0.00547

Skewness 1.731

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.79 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.792

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14

90% UPL (t) 42.95 90% UPL (t) 42.95

90% Percentile (z) 42.89 90% Percentile (z) 42.89

95% Percentile (z) 42.98 95% Percentile (z) 42.98

99% Percentile (z) 43.14 99% Percentile (z) 43.14

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 22351 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Minnesota UPL Results 25Theta Star 0.00191

MLE of Mean 42.6

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.285

nu sta r 312910

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.281 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 42.79

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.523 95% Percentile 42.94

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 43.05

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.08

90% Percentile 42.96 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 43.08

95% Percentile 43.07 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 43.08

99% Percentile 43.26 90% UPL 43.08

90% Chebyshev UP L 43.34

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 42.95 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 42.74

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 42.95

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14

Sulfu r

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.009 Minimum

‐ 4.711

Maximum 0.021 Maximum

‐ 3.863

Second Largest 0.018 Second Largest

‐ 4.017

First Quartile 0.012 First Quartile

‐ 4.437

Median 0.015 Median

‐ 4.2

Third Quartile 0.018 Third Quartile

‐ 4.017

Mean 0.015 Mean

‐ 4.24

SD 0.0044 SD 0.316

Coefficient of Variation 0.293

Skewness

‐ 0.198

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.944 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.919

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 26Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.0253 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.0301

90% UPL (t) 0.0218 90% UPL (t) 0.0234

90% Percentile (z) 0.0206 90% Percentile (z) 0.0216

95% Percentile (z) 0.0222 95% Percentile (z) 0.0242

99% Percentile (z) 0.0252 99% Percentile (z) 0.03

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 7.227 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00208

MLE of Mean 0.015

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.00558

nu sta r 101.2

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.331 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 0.0192

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.204 95% Percentile 0.0201

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.312 99% Percentile 0.0208

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.021

90% Percentile 0.0224 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.021

95% Percentile 0.0252 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.0192

99% Percentile 0.0309 90% UPL 0.021

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.0291

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.0227 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.027

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.0229

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.0279

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.0283

Heating Value

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 8033 Minimum 8.991

Maximum 8805 Maximum 9.083

Second Largest 8644 Second Largest 9.065

First Quartile 8339 First Quartile 9.029

Median 8624 Median 9.062

Third Quartile 8634 Third Quartile 9.063

Mean 8487 Mean 9.046

SD 267 SD 0.0318

Coefficient of Variation 0.0315

Skewness

‐ 0.796

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Minnesota UPL Results 27Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.921 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.916

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9110 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9136

90% UPL (t) 8898 90% UPL (t) 8908

90% Percentile (z) 8829 90% Percentile (z) 8836

95% Percentile (z) 8926 95% Percentile (z) 8938

99% Percentile (z) 9108 99% Percentile (z) 9134

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 665.1 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 12.76

MLE of Mean 8487

MLE of Standard Deviation 329.1

nu sta r 9311

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.399 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 8708

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.283 95% Percentile 8757

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 8795

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8805

90% Percentile 8911 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 8805

95% Percentile 9035 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 8805

99% Percentile 9271 90% UPL 8805

90% Chebyshev UP L 9343

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 8905 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 9077

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 8905

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9127

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9129

Antimony

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.17 Minimum

‐ 1.772

Maximum 0.59 Maximum

‐ 0.528

Second Largest 0.43 Second Largest

‐ 0.844

First Quartile 0.265 First Quartile

‐ 1.382

Median 0.37 Median

‐ 0.994

Third Quartile 0.42 Third Quartile

‐ 0.868

Mean 0.357 Mean

‐ 1.113

SD 0.147 SD 0.462

Coefficient of Variation 0.41

Minnesota UPL Results 28Skewness 0.0777

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.928 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.882

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.699 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.964

90% UPL (t) 0.583 90% UPL (t) 0.668

90% Percentile (z) 0.545 90% Percentile (z) 0.593

95% Percentile (z) 0.598 95% Percentile (z) 0.702

99% Percentile (z) 0.698 99% Percentile (z) 0.961

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3.597 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0993

MLE of Mean 0.357

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.188

nu sta r 50.35

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.447 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.71 90% Percentile 0.494

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.248 95% Percentile 0.542

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.313 99% Percentile 0.58

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.59

90% Percentile 0.61 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.59

95% Percentile 0.712 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.59

99% Percentile 0.933 90% UPL 0.59

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.827

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.627 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.653

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.635

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.825

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.852

Arsenic

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Minnesota UPL Results 29Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.95 Minimum 0.668

Maximum 65.7 Maximum 4.185

Second Largest 50.4 Second Largest 3.92

First Quartile 6.705 First Quartile 1.604

Median 13.8 Median 2.625

Third Quartile 33.65 Third Quartile 3.374

Mean 23.17 Mean 2.491

SD 24.87 SD 1.37

Coefficient of Variation 1.073

Skewness 1.147

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.819 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.908

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.18 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 294.7

90% UPL (t) 61.44 90% UPL (t) 99.35

90% Percentile (z) 55.03 90% Percentile (z) 69.81

95% Percentile (z) 64.07 95% Percentile (z) 114.8

99% Percentile (z) 81.02 99% Percentile (z) 292

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.608 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 38.12

MLE of Mean 23.17

MLE of Standard Deviation 29.72

nu sta r 8.508

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.336 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.731 90% Percentile 56.52

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.182 95% Percentile 61.11

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.321 99% Percentile 64.78

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 65.7

90% Percentile 60.08 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 65.7

95% Percentile 82.98 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 65.7

99% Percentile 138.3 90% UPL 65.7

90% Chebyshev UP L 102.9

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 71.15 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 74.07

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 74.94

Minnesota UPL Results 3090% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 124.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 141.8

Beryllium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 1

Warning: There is only one distinct observation value in this data set

‐ resulting in '0' variance !

ProUCL (or any other software) should not be used on such a data set!

The data set for variable Beryllium was not processed!

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible, compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) based sample size and analytical results

.

The Project Team may decide to use alternative site specific values to estimate environmental parameters (e.g., EPC, BTV)

.

Cadmium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 4

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.13 Minimum

‐ 2.04

Maximum 0.25 Maximum

‐ 1.386

Second Largest 0.18 Second Largest

‐ 1.715

First Quartile 0.135 First Quartile

‐ 2.003

Median 0.14 Median

‐ 1.966

Third Quartile 0.16 Third Quartile

‐ 1.84

Mean 0.159 Mean

‐ 1.869

SD 0.0438 SD 0.239

Coefficient of Variation 0.276

Skewness 1.973

Warning: There are only 4 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.704 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.746

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 31Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.261 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.27

90% UPL (t) 0.226 90% UPL (t) 0.223

90% Percentile (z) 0.215 90% Percentile (z) 0.21

95% Percentile (z) 0.231 95% Percentile (z) 0.229

99% Percentile (z) 0.26 99% Percentile (z) 0.269

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 10.77 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0147

MLE of Mean 0.159

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0483

nu sta r 150.8

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.961 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.707 90% Percentile 0.208

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.388 95% Percentile 0.229

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.312 99% Percentile 0.246

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.25

90% Percentile 0.223 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.25

95% Percentile 0.245 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.25

99% Percentile 0.292 90% UPL 0.25

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.299

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.224 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.198

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.224

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.266

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.267

Chromium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.01 Minimum 1.102

Maximum 73.2 Maximum 4.293

Second Largest 60.1 Second Largest 4.096

First Quartile 9.05 First Quartile 2.025

Median 16.2 Median 2.785

Third Quartile 40.65 Third Quartile 3.575

Mean 27.4 Mean 2.769

SD 27.83 SD 1.211

Coefficient of Variation 1.016

Skewness 1.08

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Minnesota UPL Results 32Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.82 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.93

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 92.34 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 269.1

90% UPL (t) 70.24 90% UPL (t) 102.8

90% Percentile (z) 63.07 90% Percentile (z) 75.27

95% Percentile (z) 73.18 95% Percentile (z) 116.9

99% Percentile (z) 92.15 99% Percentile (z) 266.9

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.7 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 39.15

MLE of Mean 27.4

MLE of Standard Deviation 32.75

nu sta r 9.798

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.329 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.727 90% Percentile 65.34

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.182 95% Percentile 69.27

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.319 99% Percentile 72.41

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 73.2

90% Percentile 68.79 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 73.2

95% Percentile 93.27 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 73.2

99% Percentile 151.7 90% UPL 73.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 116.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 79.82 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 88.05

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 83.19

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 135.6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 151.2

Cobalt

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.38 Minimum

‐ 0.968

Maximum 1.52 Maximum 0.419

Second Largest 0.62 Second Largest

‐ 0.478

First Quartile 0.41 First Quartile

‐ 0.892

Median 0.46 Median

‐ 0.777

Third Quartile 0.565 Third Quartile

‐ 0.576

Mean 0.616 Mean

‐ 0.609

SD 0.407 SD 0.482

Coefficient of Variation 0.661

Minnesota UPL Results 33Skewness 2.438

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.625 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.746

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.565 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.675

90% UPL (t) 1.242 90% UPL (t) 1.143

90% Percentile (z) 1.137 90% Percentile (z) 1.009

95% Percentile (z) 1.285 95% Percentile (z) 1.202

99% Percentile (z) 1.562 99% Percentile (z) 1.67

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.498 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.246

MLE of Mean 0.616

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.39

nu sta r 34.97

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.007 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.71 90% Percentile 0.98

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.297 95% Percentile 1.25

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.313 99% Percentile 1.466

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.52

90% Percentile 1.138 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.52

95% Percentile 1.364 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.52

99% Percentile 1.858 90% UPL 1.52

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.921

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.176 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.798

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.168

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.618

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.63

Lead

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Minnesota UPL Results 34Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 8.78 Minimum 2.172

Maximum 96.8 Maximum 4.573

Second Largest 41.3 Second Largest 3.721

First Quartile 14.1 First Quartile 2.64

Median 22 Median 3.091

Third Quartile 37.95 Third Quartile 3.632

Mean 33.1 Mean 3.197

SD 30.47 SD 0.816

Coefficient of Variation 0.92

Skewness 1.892

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.788 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.97

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 104.2 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 164.2

90% UPL (t) 79.99 90% UPL (t) 85.9

90% Percentile (z) 72.14 90% Percentile (z) 69.61

95% Percentile (z) 83.21 95% Percentile (z) 93.63

99% Percentile (z) 104 99% Percentile (z) 163.3

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.125 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 29.41

MLE of Mean 33.1

MLE of Standard Deviation 31.2

nu sta r 15.76

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.303 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.717 90% Percentile 63.5

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.172 95% Percentile 80.15

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.316 99% Percentile 93.47

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 96.8

90% Percentile 74.02 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 96.8

95% Percentile 95.12 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 96.8

99% Percentile 143.7 90% UPL 96.8

90% Chebyshev UP L 130.8

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 80.76 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 73.73

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 81.55

Minnesota UPL Results 3590% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 125.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 131.6

Manganese

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 38.6 Minimum 3.653

Maximum 156 Maximum 5.05

Second Largest 55.3 Second Largest 4.013

First Quartile 39.25 First Quartile 3.67

Median 41.5 Median 3.726

Third Quartile 49.7 Third Quartile 3.9

Mean 59.14 Mean 3.938

SD 43.1 SD 0.506

Coefficient of Variation 0.729

Skewness 2.55

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.556 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.64

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 159.7 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 167

90% UPL (t) 125.5 90% UPL (t) 111.8

90% Percentile (z) 114.4 90% Percentile (z) 98.14

95% Percentile (z) 130 95% Percentile (z) 117.9

99% Percentile (z) 159.4 99% Percentile (z) 166.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.202 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 26.85

MLE of Mean 59.14

MLE of Standard Deviation 39.85

nu sta r 30.83

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.374 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.71 90% Percentile 95.58

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.354 95% Percentile 125.8

Minnesota UPL Results 365% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.313 99% Percentile 150

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 156

90% Percentile 112.5 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 156

95% Percentile 136.1 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 156

99% Percentile 188.3 90% UPL 156

90% Chebyshev UP L 197.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 116.8 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 65.38

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 115.5

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 163.3

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 164

Mercury

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.015 Minimum

‐ 4.2

Maximum 0.049 Maximum

‐ 3.016

Second Largest 0.04 Second Largest

‐ 3.219

First Quartile 0.0185 First Quartile

‐ 3.993

Median 0.027 Median

‐ 3.612

Third Quartile 0.036 Third Quartile

‐ 3.33

Mean 0.0286 Mean

‐ 3.639

SD 0.0126 SD 0.444

Coefficient of Variation 0.441

Skewness 0.626

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.934 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.955

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.058 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.074

90% UPL (t) 0.048 90% UPL (t) 0.052

90% Percentile (z) 0.0447 90% Percentile (z) 0.0464

95% Percentile (z) 0.0493 95% Percentile (z) 0.0545

99% Percentile (z) 0.0579 99% Percentile (z) 0.0738

Minnesota UPL Results 37Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3.591 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00796

MLE of Mean 0.0286

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0151

nu sta r 50.28

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.234 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.71 90% Percentile 0.0436

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.185 95% Percentile 0.0463

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.313 99% Percentile 0.0485

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.049

90% Percentile 0.0488 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.049

95% Percentile 0.057 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.049

99% Percentile 0.0747 90% UPL 0.049

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.069

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.0501 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.0623

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.0505

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.066

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.0676

Nickel

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.06 Minimum 0.0583

Maximum 5.05 Maximum 1.619

Second Largest 2.44 Second Largest 0.892

First Quartile 1.255 First Quartile 0.226

Median 1.35 Median 0.3

Third Quartile 2.39 Third Quartile 0.871

Mean 2.107 Mean 0.596

SD 1.411 SD 0.556

Coefficient of Variation 0.67

Skewness 1.884

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.756 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.869

Minnesota UPL Results 38Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.4 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.638

90% UPL (t) 4.28 90% UPL (t) 4.27

90% Percentile (z) 3.916 90% Percentile (z) 3.7

95% Percentile (z) 4.429 95% Percentile (z) 4.528

99% Percentile (z) 5.391 99% Percentile (z) 6.613

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.099 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 1.004

MLE of Mean 2.107

MLE of Standard Deviation 1.454

nu sta r 29.39

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.594 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.711 90% Percentile 3.484

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.294 95% Percentile 4.267

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.313 99% Percentile 4.893

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.05

90% Percentile 4.052 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 5.05

95% Percentile 4.922 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 5.05

99% Percentile 6.848 90% UPL 5.05

90% Chebyshev UP L 6.634

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4.237 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4.093

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4.241

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.968

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.097

Selenium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.27 Minimum

‐ 1.309

Maximum 0.31 Maximum

‐ 1.171

Second Largest 0.29 Second Largest

‐ 1.238

First Quartile 0.27 First Quartile

‐ 1.309

Median 0.27 Median

‐ 1.309

Third Quartile 0.28 Third Quartile

‐ 1.274

Mean 0.279 Mean

‐ 1.279

SD 0.0157 SD 0.0546

Coefficient of Variation 0.0565

Skewness 1.76

Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

Minnesota UPL Results 39However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.647 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.648

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.315 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.316

90% UPL (t) 0.303 90% UPL (t) 0.303

90% Percentile (z) 0.299 90% Percentile (z) 0.298

95% Percentile (z) 0.304 95% Percentile (z) 0.304

99% Percentile (z) 0.315 99% Percentile (z) 0.316

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 218.6 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00127

MLE of Mean 0.279

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0188

nu sta r 3060

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.329 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 0.298

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.437 95% Percentile 0.304

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 0.309

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.31

90% Percentile 0.303 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 0.31 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 0.324 90% UPL 0.31

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.329

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.303 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.295

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.303

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.316

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.316

Formaldehyde

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 9300 Minimum 9.138

Maximum 110000 Maximum 11.61

Second Largest 34000 Second Largest 10.43

First Quartile 15500 First Quartile 9.648

Median 17000 Median 9.741

Minnesota UPL Results 40Third Quartile 26000 Third Quartile 10.12

Mean 31329 Mean 10

SD 35511 SD 0.804

Coefficient of Variation 1.133

Skewness 2.412

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.626 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.84

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 114175 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 143962

90% UPL (t) 85986 90% UPL (t) 76060

90% Percentile (z) 76838 90% Percentile (z) 61835

95% Percentile (z) 89739 95% Percentile (z) 82803

99% Percentile (z) 113939 99% Percentile (z) 143194

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.995 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 31493

MLE of Mean 31329

MLE of Standard Deviation 31411

nu sta r 13.93

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.879 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.72 90% Percentile 64400

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.354 95% Percentile 87200

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.317 99% Percentile 105440

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 110000

90% Percentile 72230 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 110000

95% Percentile 94026 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 110000

99% Percentile 144655 90% UPL 110000

90% Chebyshev UP L 145217

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 78683 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 41750

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 77881

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 124893

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 128051

Bromide

Minnesota UPL Results 41General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6 Minimum 1.792

Maximum 7 Maximum 1.946

Second Largest 6 Second Largest 1.792

First Quartile 6 First Quartile 1.792

Median 6 Median 1.792

Third Quartile 6 Third Quartile 1.792

Mean 6.143 Mean 1.814

SD 0.378 SD 0.0583

Coefficient of Variation 0.0615

Skewness 2.646

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.453 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.453

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.025 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.027

90% UPL (t) 6.725 90% UPL (t) 6.709

90% Percentile (z) 6.627 90% Percentile (z) 6.609

95% Percentile (z) 6.765 95% Percentile (z) 6.75

99% Percentile (z) 7.022 99% Percentile (z) 7.024

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 189.5 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0324

MLE of Mean 6.143

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.446

nu sta r 2653

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.109 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.516 95% Percentile 6.7

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6.94

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7

Minnesota UPL Results 4290% Percentile 6.721 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 6.895 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 7.228 90% UPL 7

90% Chebyshev UP L 7.355

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.714 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.713

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.026

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.026

Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 4

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 90 Minimum 4.5

Maximum 130 Maximum 4.868

Second Largest 110 Second Largest 4.7

First Quartile 90 First Quartile 4.5

Median 95 Median 4.554

Third Quartile 110 Third Quartile 4.7

Mean 102.1 Mean 4.617

SD 15.24 SD 0.143

Coefficient of Variation 0.149

Skewness 1.112

Warning: There are only 4 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.82 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.83

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 137.7 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 141.2

90% UPL (t) 125.6 90% UPL (t) 126.1

90% Percentile (z) 121.7 90% Percentile (z) 121.5

95% Percentile (z) 127.2 95% Percentile (z) 128

99% Percentile (z) 137.6 99% Percentile (z) 141

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 32.03 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 43Theta Star 3.189

MLE of Mean 102.1

MLE of Standard Deviation 18.05

nu sta r 448.5

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.629 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 118

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.26 95% Percentile 124

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 128.8

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 130

90% Percentile 125.8 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 130

95% Percentile 133.5 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 118

99% Percentile 148.7 90% UPL 130

90% Chebyshev UP L 151

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 125.9 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 140

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 125.9

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 139.8

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 140.1

Fluoride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 4

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5 Minimum 1.609

Maximum 25 Maximum 3.219

Second Largest 25 Second Largest 3.219

First Quartile 6 First Quartile 1.792

Median 24 Median 3.178

Third Quartile 25 Third Quartile 3.219

Mean 16.57 Mean 2.575

SD 10.21 SD 0.792

Coefficient of Variation 0.616

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 4 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.697 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.71

Minnesota UPL Results 44Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 40.4 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 83.42

90% UPL (t) 32.29 90% UPL (t) 44.47

90% Percentile (z) 29.66 90% Percentile (z) 36.26

95% Percentile (z) 33.37 95% Percentile (z) 48.36

99% Percentile (z) 40.33 99% Percentile (z) 82.98

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.413 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 11.73

MLE of Mean 16.57

MLE of Standard Deviation 13.94

nu sta r 19.78

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.142 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.714 90% Percentile 25

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.364 95% Percentile 25

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.315 99% Percentile 25

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 25

90% Percentile 35.04 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 25

95% Percentile 44.05 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 25

99% Percentile 64.46 90% UPL 25

90% Chebyshev UP L 49.32

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 38.02 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 53.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 39.25

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 56.8

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 61.1

1,1,2,2

‐ Tetrachloroethane

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4.43 Minimum 1.488

Maximum 4.61 Maximum 1.528

Second Largest 4.61 Second Largest 1.528

First Quartile 4.43 First Quartile 1.488

Median 4.61 Median 1.528

Third Quartile 4.61 Third Quartile 1.528

Mean 4.533 Mean 1.511

SD 0.0962 SD 0.0213

Coefficient of Variation 0.0212

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

Minnesota UPL Results 45However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.757 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.763

90% UPL (t) 4.681 90% UPL (t) 4.683

90% Percentile (z) 4.656 90% Percentile (z) 4.657

95% Percentile (z) 4.691 95% Percentile (z) 4.693

99% Percentile (z) 4.757 99% Percentile (z) 4.762

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1474 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00308

MLE of Mean 4.533

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.118

nu sta r 20636

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4.61

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 4.61

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4.61

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.61

90% Percentile 4.685 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4.729 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4.812 90% UPL 4.61

90% Chebyshev UP L 4.841

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4.682 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4.88

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4.682

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4.761

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4.761

1,1,2

‐ Trichloroethane

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 7.5 Minimum 2.015

Maximum 7.81 Maximum 2.055

Second Largest 7.81 Second Largest 2.055

First Quartile 7.5 First Quartile 2.015

Median 7.81 Median 2.055

Minnesota UPL Results 46Third Quartile 7.81 Third Quartile 2.055

Mean 7.677 Mean 2.038

SD 0.166 SD 0.0216

Coefficient of Variation 0.0216

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8.064 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8.073

90% UPL (t) 7.932 90% UPL (t) 7.936

90% Percentile (z) 7.889 90% Percentile (z) 7.892

95% Percentile (z) 7.95 95% Percentile (z) 7.954

99% Percentile (z) 8.063 99% Percentile (z) 8.072

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1425 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00539

MLE of Mean 7.677

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.203

nu sta r 19956

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 7.81

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 7.81

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 7.81

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.81

90% Percentile 7.939 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 8.015 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 8.158 90% UPL 7.81

90% Chebyshev UP L 8.209

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7.934 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 8.275

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7.935

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8.07

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8.071

Minnesota UPL Results 471,2,4

‐ Trichlorobenzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2.5 Minimum 0.916

Maximum 2.6 Maximum 0.956

Second Largest 2.6 Second Largest 0.956

First Quartile 2.5 First Quartile 0.916

Median 2.6 Median 0.956

Third Quartile 2.6 Third Quartile 0.956

Mean 2.557 Mean 0.939

SD 0.0535 SD 0.021

Coefficient of Variation 0.0209

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.682 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.685

90% UPL (t) 2.639 90% UPL (t) 2.641

90% Percentile (z) 2.626 90% Percentile (z) 2.626

95% Percentile (z) 2.645 95% Percentile (z) 2.646

99% Percentile (z) 2.681 99% Percentile (z) 2.684

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1520 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00168

MLE of Mean 2.557

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0656

nu sta r 21280

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2.6

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 2.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2.6

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 48Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.6

90% Percentile 2.642 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2.666 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2.712 90% UPL 2.6

90% Chebyshev UP L 2.729

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2.64 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2.75

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2.64

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.684

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.684

1,4

‐ Dichlorobenzene(p)

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.93 Minimum 0.658

Maximum 2 Maximum 0.693

Second Largest 2 Second Largest 0.693

First Quartile 1.93 First Quartile 0.658

Median 2 Median 0.693

Third Quartile 2 Third Quartile 0.693

Mean 1.97 Mean 0.678

SD 0.0374 SD 0.019

Coefficient of Variation 0.019

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.057 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.059

90% UPL (t) 2.028 90% UPL (t) 2.028

90% Percentile (z) 2.018 90% Percentile (z) 2.018

95% Percentile (z) 2.032 95% Percentile (z) 2.032

99% Percentile (z) 2.057 99% Percentile (z) 2.059

Minnesota UPL Results 49Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1842 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00107

MLE of Mean 1.97

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0459

nu sta r 25784

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.3 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 2

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2

90% Percentile 2.029 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2.046 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2.078 90% UPL 2

90% Chebyshev UP L 2.09

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2.028 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2.105

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2.028

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.059

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.059

Acetonitrile

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 59.7 Minimum 4.089

Maximum 62 Maximum 4.127

Second Largest 62 Second Largest 4.127

First Quartile 59.7 First Quartile 4.089

Median 62 Median 4.127

Third Quartile 62 Third Quartile 4.127

Mean 61.01 Mean 4.111

SD 1.229 SD 0.0202

Coefficient of Variation 0.0201

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 50Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 63.88 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 63.95

90% UPL (t) 62.91 90% UPL (t) 62.93

90% Percentile (z) 62.59 90% Percentile (z) 62.6

95% Percentile (z) 63.04 95% Percentile (z) 63.07

99% Percentile (z) 63.87 99% Percentile (z) 63.94

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1636 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0373

MLE of Mean 61.01

MLE of Standard Deviation 1.508

nu sta r 22905

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.298 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 62

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 62

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 62

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 62

90% Percentile 62.96 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 63.52 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 64.58 90% UPL 62

90% Chebyshev UP L 64.96

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 62.92 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 65.45

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 62.92

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 63.93

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 63.93

Acrolein

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 133 Minimum 4.89

Maximum 138 Maximum 4.927

Second Largest 138 Second Largest 4.927

First Quartile 133 First Quartile 4.89

Median 138 Median 4.927

Third Quartile 138 Third Quartile 4.927

Mean 135.9 Mean 4.911

SD 2.673 SD 0.0197

Coefficient of Variation 0.0197

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

Minnesota UPL Results 51It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 142.1 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 142.2

90% UPL (t) 140 90% UPL (t) 140

90% Percentile (z) 139.3 90% Percentile (z) 139.3

95% Percentile (z) 140.3 95% Percentile (z) 140.3

99% Percentile (z) 142.1 99% Percentile (z) 142.2

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1717 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0791

MLE of Mean 135.9

MLE of Standard Deviation 3.279

nu sta r 24031

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.299 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 138

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 138

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 138

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 138

90% Percentile 140.1 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 141.3 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 143.6 90% UPL 138

90% Chebyshev UP L 144.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 140 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 145.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 140

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 142.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 142.2

Acrylonitrile

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 50 Minimum 3.912

Maximum 52 Maximum 3.951

Second Largest 52 Second Largest 3.951

Minnesota UPL Results 52First Quartile 50 First Quartile 3.912

Median 52 Median 3.951

Third Quartile 52 Third Quartile 3.951

Mean 51.14 Mean 3.934

SD 1.069 SD 0.021

Coefficient of Variation 0.0209

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 53.64 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 53.7

90% UPL (t) 52.79 90% UPL (t) 52.81

90% Percentile (z) 52.51 90% Percentile (z) 52.53

95% Percentile (z) 52.9 95% Percentile (z) 52.93

99% Percentile (z) 53.63 99% Percentile (z) 53.69

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1520 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0336

MLE of Mean 51.14

MLE of Standard Deviation 1.312

nu sta r 21280

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 52

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 52

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 52

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 52

90% Percentile 52.83 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 53.32 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 54.24 90% UPL 52

90% Chebyshev UP L 54.57

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 52.8 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 55

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 52.8

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 53.68

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 53.68

Minnesota UPL Results 53Allyl Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6.93 Minimum 1.936

Maximum 7.2 Maximum 1.974

Second Largest 7.2 Second Largest 1.974

First Quartile 6.93 First Quartile 1.936

Median 7.2 Median 1.974

Third Quartile 7.2 Third Quartile 1.974

Mean 7.084 Mean 1.958

SD 0.144 SD 0.0204

Coefficient of Variation 0.0204

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.421 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.429

90% UPL (t) 7.306 90% UPL (t) 7.309

90% Percentile (z) 7.269 90% Percentile (z) 7.271

95% Percentile (z) 7.322 95% Percentile (z) 7.325

99% Percentile (z) 7.42 99% Percentile (z) 7.428

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1600 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00443

MLE of Mean 7.084

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.177

nu sta r 22406

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 7.2

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 7.2

Minnesota UPL Results 545% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 7.2

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.2

90% Percentile 7.312 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 7.378 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 7.503 90% UPL 7.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 7.547

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7.308 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 7.605

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7.309

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.426

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.427

Benzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.27 Minimum 1.185

Maximum 3.41 Maximum 1.227

Second Largest 3.41 Second Largest 1.227

First Quartile 3.27 First Quartile 1.185

Median 3.41 Median 1.227

Third Quartile 3.41 Third Quartile 1.227

Mean 3.35 Mean 1.209

SD 0.0748 SD 0.0224

Coefficient of Variation 0.0223

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3.525 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3.529

90% UPL (t) 3.465 90% UPL (t) 3.467

90% Percentile (z) 3.446 90% Percentile (z) 3.447

95% Percentile (z) 3.473 95% Percentile (z) 3.475

Minnesota UPL Results 5599% Percentile (z) 3.524 99% Percentile (z) 3.529

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1331 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00252

MLE of Mean 3.35

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0918

nu sta r 18628

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.295 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3.41

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 3.41

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3.41

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3.41

90% Percentile 3.468 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3.502 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3.567 90% UPL 3.41

90% Chebyshev UP L 3.59

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3.466 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3.62

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3.466

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3.528

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3.528

Bromoform

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6.54 Minimum 1.878

Maximum 6.81 Maximum 1.918

Second Largest 6.81 Second Largest 1.918

First Quartile 6.54 First Quartile 1.878

Median 6.81 Median 1.918

Third Quartile 6.81 Third Quartile 1.918

Mean 6.694 Mean 1.901

SD 0.144 SD 0.0216

Coefficient of Variation 0.0216

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Minnesota UPL Results 56Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.031 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.039

90% UPL (t) 6.916 90% UPL (t) 6.919

90% Percentile (z) 6.879 90% Percentile (z) 6.881

95% Percentile (z) 6.932 95% Percentile (z) 6.935

99% Percentile (z) 7.03 99% Percentile (z) 7.038

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1429 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00469

MLE of Mean 6.694

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.177

nu sta r 20003

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6.81

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 6.81

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6.81

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.81

90% Percentile 6.922 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 6.988 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 7.113 90% UPL 6.81

90% Chebyshev UP L 7.157

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.918 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 7.215

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.919

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.036

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.037

Chlorobenzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2.7 Minimum 0.993

Maximum 2.81 Maximum 1.033

Second Largest 2.81 Second Largest 1.033

First Quartile 2.7 First Quartile 0.993

Median 2.81 Median 1.033

Third Quartile 2.81 Third Quartile 1.033

Mean 2.763 Mean 1.016

SD 0.0588 SD 0.0213

Coefficient of Variation 0.0213

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

Minnesota UPL Results 57There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.9 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.903

90% UPL (t) 2.853 90% UPL (t) 2.855

90% Percentile (z) 2.838 90% Percentile (z) 2.839

95% Percentile (z) 2.86 95% Percentile (z) 2.861

99% Percentile (z) 2.9 99% Percentile (z) 2.903

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1466 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00188

MLE of Mean 2.763

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0722

nu sta r 20529

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2.81

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 2.81

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2.81

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.81

90% Percentile 2.856 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2.883 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2.933 90% UPL 2.81

90% Chebyshev UP L 2.951

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2.854 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2.975

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2.854

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.902

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.903

Chloroform

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.47 Minimum 1.244

Minnesota UPL Results 58Maximum 3.6 Maximum 1.281

Second Largest 3.6 Second Largest 1.281

First Quartile 3.47 First Quartile 1.244

Median 3.6 Median 1.281

Third Quartile 3.6 Third Quartile 1.281

Mean 3.544 Mean 1.265

SD 0.0695 SD 0.0197

Coefficient of Variation 0.0196

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3.706 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3.71

90% UPL (t) 3.651 90% UPL (t) 3.653

90% Percentile (z) 3.633 90% Percentile (z) 3.634

95% Percentile (z) 3.659 95% Percentile (z) 3.66

99% Percentile (z) 3.706 99% Percentile (z) 3.71

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1728 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00205

MLE of Mean 3.544

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0853

nu sta r 24195

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.299 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3.6

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 3.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3.6

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3.6

90% Percentile 3.654 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3.686 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3.746 90% UPL 3.6

90% Chebyshev UP L 3.767

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3.652 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3.795

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3.652

Minnesota UPL Results 5990% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3.709

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3.709

Chloroprene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4.43 Minimum 1.488

Maximum 4.61 Maximum 1.528

Second Largest 4.61 Second Largest 1.528

First Quartile 4.43 First Quartile 1.488

Median 4.61 Median 1.528

Third Quartile 4.61 Third Quartile 1.528

Mean 4.533 Mean 1.511

SD 0.0962 SD 0.0213

Coefficient of Variation 0.0212

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.757 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.763

90% UPL (t) 4.681 90% UPL (t) 4.683

90% Percentile (z) 4.656 90% Percentile (z) 4.657

95% Percentile (z) 4.691 95% Percentile (z) 4.693

99% Percentile (z) 4.757 99% Percentile (z) 4.762

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1474 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00308

MLE of Mean 4.533

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.118

nu sta r 20636

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 605% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4.61

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 4.61

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4.61

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.61

90% Percentile 4.685 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4.729 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4.812 90% UPL 4.61

90% Chebyshev UP L 4.841

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4.682 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4.88

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4.682

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4.761

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4.761

Ethyl benzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 7.12 Minimum 1.963

Maximum 13.5 Maximum 2.603

Second Largest 9.2 Second Largest 2.219

First Quartile 8.235 First Quartile 2.108

Median 8.4 Median 2.128

Third Quartile 9 Third Quartile 2.197

Mean 9.07 Mean 2.186

SD 2.056 SD 0.2

Coefficient of Variation 0.227

Skewness 2.095

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.747 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.815

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 13.87 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 14.2

90% UPL (t) 12.23 90% UPL (t) 12.11

90% Percentile (z) 11.7 90% Percentile (z) 11.5

95% Percentile (z) 12.45 95% Percentile (z) 12.37

Minnesota UPL Results 6199% Percentile (z) 13.85 99% Percentile (z) 14.18

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 15.54 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.583

MLE of Mean 9.07

MLE of Standard Deviation 2.3

nu sta r 217.6

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.773 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.707 90% Percentile 10.92

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.302 95% Percentile 12.21

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 13.24

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 13.5

90% Percentile 12.11 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 13.5

95% Percentile 13.16 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 13.5

99% Percentile 15.26 90% UPL 13.5

90% Chebyshev UP L 15.66

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 12.15 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 10.15

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 12.14

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 14.06

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 14.09

Hexachlorobutadiene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4.43 Minimum 1.488

Maximum 4.61 Maximum 1.528

Second Largest 4.61 Second Largest 1.528

First Quartile 4.43 First Quartile 1.488

Median 4.61 Median 1.528

Third Quartile 4.61 Third Quartile 1.528

Mean 4.533 Mean 1.511

SD 0.0962 SD 0.0213

Coefficient of Variation 0.0212

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Minnesota UPL Results 62Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.757 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.763

90% UPL (t) 4.681 90% UPL (t) 4.683

90% Percentile (z) 4.656 90% Percentile (z) 4.657

95% Percentile (z) 4.691 95% Percentile (z) 4.693

99% Percentile (z) 4.757 99% Percentile (z) 4.762

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1474 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00308

MLE of Mean 4.533

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.118

nu sta r 20636

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4.61

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 4.61

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4.61

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4.61

90% Percentile 4.685 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4.729 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4.812 90% UPL 4.61

90% Chebyshev UP L 4.841

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4.682 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4.88

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4.682

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4.761

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4.761

Isopropylbenzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2.7 Minimum 0.993

Maximum 2.81 Maximum 1.033

Second Largest 2.81 Second Largest 1.033

First Quartile 2.75 First Quartile 1.011

Median 2.81 Median 1.033

Third Quartile 2.81 Third Quartile 1.033

Mean 2.777 Mean 1.021

SD 0.0528 SD 0.0192

Coefficient of Variation 0.019

Skewness

‐ 1.21

Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this dat a

Minnesota UPL Results 63There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.637 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.637

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.9 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.904

90% UPL (t) 2.858 90% UPL (t) 2.86

90% Percentile (z) 2.845 90% Percentile (z) 2.846

95% Percentile (z) 2.864 95% Percentile (z) 2.866

99% Percentile (z) 2.9 99% Percentile (z) 2.903

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1822 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00152

MLE of Mean 2.777

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0651

nu sta r 25512

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.392 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2.81

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.395 95% Percentile 2.81

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2.81

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.81

90% Percentile 2.861 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2.885 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2.931 90% UPL 2.81

90% Chebyshev UP L 2.947

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2.859 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2.9

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2.86

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.903

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.903

m,p

‐ Xylenes

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 18.6 Minimum 2.923

Minnesota UPL Results 64Maximum 41.7 Maximum 3.731

Second Largest 24.6 Second Largest 3.203

First Quartile 21.15 First Quartile 3.051

Median 22.1 Median 3.096

Third Quartile 24.1 Third Quartile 3.182

Mean 24.7 Mean 3.174

SD 7.746 SD 0.262

Coefficient of Variation 0.314

Skewness 2.295

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.7 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.787

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 42.77 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 44.01

90% UPL (t) 36.62 90% UPL (t) 35.75

90% Percentile (z) 34.63 90% Percentile (z) 33.42

95% Percentile (z) 37.44 95% Percentile (z) 36.76

99% Percentile (z) 42.72 99% Percentile (z) 43.94

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 8.818 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 2.801

MLE of Mean 24.7

MLE of Standard Deviation 8.318

nu sta r 123.5

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.85 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 31.44

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.329 95% Percentile 36.57

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.312 99% Percentile 40.67

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 41.7

90% Percentile 35.78 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 41.7

95% Percentile 39.78 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 41.7

99% Percentile 48.04 90% UPL 41.7

90% Chebyshev UP L 49.54

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 36.03 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 28.53

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 35.96

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 43.46

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 43.58

Minnesota UPL Results 65Methyl methacrylate

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 7.5 Minimum 2.015

Maximum 7.81 Maximum 2.055

Second Largest 7.81 Second Largest 2.055

First Quartile 7.5 First Quartile 2.015

Median 7.81 Median 2.055

Third Quartile 7.81 Third Quartile 2.055

Mean 7.677 Mean 2.038

SD 0.166 SD 0.0216

Coefficient of Variation 0.0216

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8.064 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8.073

90% UPL (t) 7.932 90% UPL (t) 7.936

90% Percentile (z) 7.889 90% Percentile (z) 7.892

95% Percentile (z) 7.95 95% Percentile (z) 7.954

99% Percentile (z) 8.063 99% Percentile (z) 8.072

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1425 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00539

MLE of Mean 7.677

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.203

nu sta r 19956

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.296 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 7.81

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 7.81

Minnesota UPL Results 665% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 7.81

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.81

90% Percentile 7.939 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 8.015 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 8.158 90% UPL 7.81

90% Chebyshev UP L 8.209

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7.934 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 8.275

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7.935

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8.07

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8.071

Methyl tert butyl ethe r

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5 Minimum 1.609

Maximum 5.2 Maximum 1.649

Second Largest 5.2 Second Largest 1.649

First Quartile 5 First Quartile 1.609

Median 5.2 Median 1.649

Third Quartile 5.2 Third Quartile 1.649

Mean 5.114 Mean 1.632

SD 0.107 SD 0.021

Coefficient of Variation 0.0209

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.364 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.37

90% UPL (t) 5.279 90% UPL (t) 5.281

90% Percentile (z) 5.251 90% Percentile (z) 5.253

95% Percentile (z) 5.29 95% Percentile (z) 5.293

Minnesota UPL Results 6799% Percentile (z) 5.363 99% Percentile (z) 5.369

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1520 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00336

MLE of Mean 5.114

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.131

nu sta r 21280

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5.2

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 5.2

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5.2

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.2

90% Percentile 5.283 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5.332 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5.424 90% UPL 5.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 5.457

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5.28 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5.28

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.368

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.368

Methylene chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 25.4 Minimum 3.235

Maximum 35.8 Maximum 3.578

Second Largest 34.6 Second Largest 3.544

First Quartile 28.1 First Quartile 3.333

Median 31.6 Median 3.453

Third Quartile 33.9 Third Quartile 3.523

Mean 30.97 Mean 3.425

SD 4.045 SD 0.135

Coefficient of Variation 0.131

Skewness

‐ 0.439

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 68Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.921 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.906

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 40.41 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 42.07

90% UPL (t) 37.2 90% UPL (t) 37.81

90% Percentile (z) 36.16 90% Percentile (z) 36.52

95% Percentile (z) 37.63 95% Percentile (z) 38.35

99% Percentile (z) 40.38 99% Percentile (z) 42.04

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 37.74 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.821

MLE of Mean 30.97

MLE of Standard Deviation 5.041

nu sta r 528.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.357 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 35.08

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.195 95% Percentile 35.44

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 35.73

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 35.8

90% Percentile 37.58 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 35.8

95% Percentile 39.7 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 35.8

99% Percentile 43.89 90% UPL 35.8

90% Chebyshev UP L 43.95

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 37.58 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 42.6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 37.64

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 41.43

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 41.58

Naphthalene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 80.6 Minimum 4.389

Maximum 179 Maximum 5.187

Second Largest 140 Second Largest 4.942

First Quartile 121.5 First Quartile 4.799

Median 136 Median 4.913

Third Quartile 140 Third Quartile 4.942

Mean 131.2 Mean 4.853

SD 29.54 SD 0.243

Coefficient of Variation 0.225

Skewness

‐ 0.198

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

Minnesota UPL Results 69If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.939 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.904

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 200.1 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 225.7

90% UPL (t) 176.7 90% UPL (t) 186.2

90% Percentile (z) 169.1 90% Percentile (z) 174.9

95% Percentile (z) 179.8 95% Percentile (z) 191

99% Percentile (z) 199.9 99% Percentile (z) 225.3

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 12.18 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 10.77

MLE of Mean 131.2

MLE of Standard Deviation 37.6

nu sta r 170.6

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.409 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.707 90% Percentile 155.6

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.212 95% Percentile 167.3

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 176.7

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 179

90% Percentile 181.1 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 179

95% Percentile 198.6 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 155.6

99% Percentile 234.1 90% UPL 179

90% Chebyshev UP L 226

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 182 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 167.8

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 183

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 214.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 216.7

n

‐ Hexane

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6.16 Minimum 1.818

Maximum 6.4 Maximum 1.856

Second Largest 6.4 Second Largest 1.856

First Quartile 6.16 First Quartile 1.818

Median 6.4 Median 1.856

Minnesota UPL Results 70Third Quartile 6.4 Third Quartile 1.856

Mean 6.297 Mean 1.84

SD 0.128 SD 0.0204

Coefficient of Variation 0.0204

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.596 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.603

90% UPL (t) 6.495 90% UPL (t) 6.497

90% Percentile (z) 6.462 90% Percentile (z) 6.463

95% Percentile (z) 6.508 95% Percentile (z) 6.511

99% Percentile (z) 6.596 99% Percentile (z) 6.602

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1600 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00393

MLE of Mean 6.297

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.157

nu sta r 22406

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 6.4

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6.4

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.4

90% Percentile 6.5 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 6.558 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 6.669 90% UPL 6.4

90% Chebyshev UP L 6.709

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.496 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6.76

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.496

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.601

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.602

Minnesota UPL Results 71o

‐ Xylenes

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 10 Minimum 2.303

Maximum 26 Maximum 3.258

Second Largest 12.3 Second Largest 2.51

First Quartile 10.3 First Quartile 2.332

Median 10.6 Median 2.361

Third Quartile 12.05 Third Quartile 2.489

Mean 13.04 Mean 2.509

SD 5.778 SD 0.339

Coefficient of Variation 0.443

Skewness 2.527

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.583 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.65

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 26.52 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 27.12

90% UPL (t) 21.94 90% UPL (t) 20.72

90% Percentile (z) 20.45 90% Percentile (z) 18.99

95% Percentile (z) 22.55 95% Percentile (z) 21.48

99% Percentile (z) 26.48 99% Percentile (z) 27.06

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 5.016 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 2.6

MLE of Mean 13.04

MLE of Standard Deviation 5.823

nu sta r 70.23

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.293 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.709 90% Percentile 17.78

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.379 95% Percentile 21.89

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.312 99% Percentile 25.18

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 26

Minnesota UPL Results 7290% Percentile 20.84 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 26

95% Percentile 23.86 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 26

99% Percentile 30.24 90% UPL 26

90% Chebyshev UP L 31.57

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 21.15 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 14.68

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 21.04

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 26.85

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 26.91

Styrene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 21.7 Minimum 3.077

Maximum 49.4 Maximum 3.9

Second Largest 48 Second Largest 3.871

First Quartile 29 First Quartile 3.367

Median 39.2 Median 3.669

Third Quartile 44.85 Third Quartile 3.801

Mean 36.86 Mean 3.569

SD 10.53 SD 0.306

Coefficient of Variation 0.286

Skewness

‐ 0.2

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.935 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.925

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 61.42 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 72.43

90% UPL (t) 53.06 90% UPL (t) 56.81

90% Percentile (z) 50.35 90% Percentile (z) 52.51

95% Percentile (z) 54.17 95% Percentile (z) 58.68

99% Percentile (z) 61.35 99% Percentile (z) 72.29

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 7.655 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 4.815

MLE of Mean 36.86

Minnesota UPL Results 73MLE of Standard Deviation 13.32

nu sta r 107.2

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.311 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 48.56

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.196 95% Percentile 48.98

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.312 99% Percentile 49.32

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 49.4

90% Percentile 54.62 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 49.4

95% Percentile 61.15 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 49.4

99% Percentile 74.68 90% UPL 49.4

90% Chebyshev UP L 70.62

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 55.2 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 68.63

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 55.56

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 67.38

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 68.46

Tetrachloroethylene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4.81 Minimum 1.571

Maximum 5 Maximum 1.609

Second Largest 5 Second Largest 1.609

First Quartile 4.81 First Quartile 1.571

Median 5 Median 1.609

Third Quartile 5 Third Quartile 1.609

Mean 4.919 Mean 1.593

SD 0.102 SD 0.0207

Coefficient of Variation 0.0206

Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 74Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.156 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.161

90% UPL (t) 5.075 90% UPL (t) 5.077

90% Percentile (z) 5.049 90% Percentile (z) 5.05

95% Percentile (z) 5.086 95% Percentile (z) 5.088

99% Percentile (z) 5.155 99% Percentile (z) 5.16

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1558 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00316

MLE of Mean 4.919

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.125

nu sta r 21810

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 5

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5

90% Percentile 5.079 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5.125 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5.213 90% UPL 5

90% Chebyshev UP L 5.244

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5.076 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5.285

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5.076

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.159

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.16

Toluene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 144 Minimum 4.97

Maximum 221 Maximum 5.398

Second Largest 215 Second Largest 5.371

First Quartile 183.5 First Quartile 5.208

Median 202 Median 5.308

Third Quartile 211 Third Quartile 5.352

Mean 193.7 Mean 5.256

SD 28.09 SD 0.156

Coefficient of Variation 0.145

Skewness

‐ 1.167

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Minnesota UPL Results 75Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.857 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.832

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 259.3 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 276.3

90% UPL (t) 237 90% UPL (t) 244

90% Percentile (z) 229.7 90% Percentile (z) 234.4

95% Percentile (z) 239.9 95% Percentile (z) 248.1

99% Percentile (z) 259.1 99% Percentile (z) 276

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 28.84 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 6.716

MLE of Mean 193.7

MLE of Standard Deviation 36.07

nu sta r 403.8

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.631 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 217.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.336 95% Percentile 219.2

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 220.6

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 221

90% Percentile 241.1 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 221

95% Percentile 256.6 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 221

99% Percentile 287.3 90% UPL 221

90% Chebyshev UP L 283.8

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 241.3 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 252.3

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 241.9

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 269.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 271

Vinyl Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5 Minimum 1.609

Maximum 5.2 Maximum 1.649

Second Largest 5.2 Second Largest 1.649

First Quartile 5 First Quartile 1.609

Median 5.2 Median 1.649

Third Quartile 5.2 Third Quartile 1.649

Mean 5.114 Mean 1.632

SD 0.107 SD 0.021

Coefficient of Variation 0.0209

Minnesota UPL Results 76Skewness

‐ 0.374

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.663

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.364 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.37

90% UPL (t) 5.279 90% UPL (t) 5.281

90% Percentile (z) 5.251 90% Percentile (z) 5.253

95% Percentile (z) 5.29 95% Percentile (z) 5.293

99% Percentile (z) 5.363 99% Percentile (z) 5.369

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1520 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00336

MLE of Mean 5.114

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.131

nu sta r 21280

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.297 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5.2

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.378 95% Percentile 5.2

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5.2

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.2

90% Percentile 5.283 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5.332 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5.424 90% UPL 5.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 5.457

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5.28 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5.28

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.368

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.368

1,2,3

‐ Trichlorobenzene

General Statistic s

Minnesota UPL Results 77Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5560 Minimum 8.623

Maximum 5730 Maximum 8.653

Second Largest 5730 Second Largest 8.653

First Quartile 5645 First Quartile 8.638

Median 5730 Median 8.653

Third Quartile 5730 Third Quartile 8.653

Mean 5681 Mean 8.645

SD 82.95 SD 0.0147

Coefficient of Variation 0.0146

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5875 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5879

90% UPL (t) 5809 90% UPL (t) 5811

90% Percentile (z) 5788 90% Percentile (z) 5789

95% Percentile (z) 5818 95% Percentile (z) 5820

99% Percentile (z) 5874 99% Percentile (z) 5878

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3100 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.832

MLE of Mean 5681

MLE of Standard Deviation 102

nu sta r 43407

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 5730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5730

90% Percentile 5813 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5850 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

Minnesota UPL Results 7899% Percentile 5921 90% UPL 5730

90% Chebyshev UP L 5947

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5810 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5858

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5810

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5878

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5878

1,4

‐ Dichlorobenzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3620 Minimum 8.194

Maximum 3730 Maximum 8.224

Second Largest 3730 Second Largest 8.224

First Quartile 3675 First Quartile 8.209

Median 3730 Median 8.224

Third Quartile 3730 Third Quartile 8.224

Mean 3699 Mean 8.216

SD 53.67 SD 0.0146

Coefficient of Variation 0.0145

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3824 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% UPL (t) 3781 90% UPL (t) 3782

90% Percentile (z) 3767 90% Percentile (z) 3768

95% Percentile (z) 3787 95% Percentile (z) 3788

99% Percentile (z) 3823 99% Percentile (z) 3826

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3138 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.178

MLE of Mean 3699

Minnesota UPL Results 79MLE of Standard Deviation 66.02

nu sta r 43939

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3730

90% Percentile 3783 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3808 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3854 90% UPL 3730

90% Chebyshev UP L 3871

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3782 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3813

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3782

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

1

‐ Methylnaphthalen e

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5830 Minimum 8.671

Maximum 6010 Maximum 8.701

Second Largest 6010 Second Largest 8.701

First Quartile 5920 First Quartile 8.686

Median 6010 Median 8.701

Third Quartile 6010 Third Quartile 8.701

Mean 5959 Mean 8.692

SD 87.83 SD 0.0148

Coefficient of Variation 0.0147

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 80Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6163 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6168

90% UPL (t) 6094 90% UPL (t) 6096

90% Percentile (z) 6071 90% Percentile (z) 6072

95% Percentile (z) 6103 95% Percentile (z) 6105

99% Percentile (z) 6163 99% Percentile (z) 6167

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3042 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.959

MLE of Mean 5959

MLE of Standard Deviation 108

nu sta r 42584

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6010

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 6010

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6010

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6010

90% Percentile 6097 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 6137 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 6213 90% UPL 6010

90% Chebyshev UP L 6240

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6095 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6145

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6095

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6166

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6167

2,4,5

‐ Trichlorophenol

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5030 Minimum 8.523

Maximum 5190 Maximum 8.554

Second Largest 5190 Second Largest 8.554

First Quartile 5110 First Quartile 8.539

Median 5190 Median 8.554

Third Quartile 5190 Third Quartile 8.554

Mean 5144 Mean 8.546

SD 78.07 SD 0.0153

Coefficient of Variation 0.0152

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Minnesota UPL Results 81Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5326 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5330

90% UPL (t) 5264 90% UPL (t) 5266

90% Percentile (z) 5244 90% Percentile (z) 5245

95% Percentile (z) 5273 95% Percentile (z) 5275

99% Percentile (z) 5326 99% Percentile (z) 5330

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2869 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.793

MLE of Mean 5144

MLE of Standard Deviation 96.05

nu sta r 40161

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.576 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5190

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 5190

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5190

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5190

90% Percentile 5268 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5303 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5370 90% UPL 5190

90% Chebyshev UP L 5395

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5266 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5310

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5266

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5329

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5329

2,4,6

‐ Trichlorophenol

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4420 Minimum 8.394

Maximum 4550 Maximum 8.423

Second Largest 4550 Second Largest 8.423

First Quartile 4485 First Quartile 8.408

Median 4550 Median 8.423

Third Quartile 4550 Third Quartile 8.423

Mean 4513 Mean 8.415

Minnesota UPL Results 82SD 63.43 SD 0.0141

Coefficient of Variation 0.0141

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4661 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4664

90% UPL (t) 4610 90% UPL (t) 4612

90% Percentile (z) 4594 90% Percentile (z) 4595

95% Percentile (z) 4617 95% Percentile (z) 4619

99% Percentile (z) 4660 99% Percentile (z) 4663

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3346 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.349

MLE of Mean 4513

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.01

nu sta r 46849

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.58 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4550

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4550

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4550

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4550

90% Percentile 4613 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4642 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4696 90% UPL 4550

90% Chebyshev UP L 4716

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4611 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4648

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4611

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4663

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4663

2,4

‐ Dinitrophenol

Minnesota UPL Results 83General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2030 Minimum 7.616

Maximum 2100 Maximum 7.65

Second Largest 2100 Second Largest 7.65

First Quartile 2065 First Quartile 7.633

Median 2100 Median 7.65

Third Quartile 2100 Third Quartile 7.65

Mean 2080 Mean 7.64

SD 34.16 SD 0.0165

Coefficient of Variation 0.0164

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2160 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2162

90% UPL (t) 2133 90% UPL (t) 2133

90% Percentile (z) 2124 90% Percentile (z) 2124

95% Percentile (z) 2136 95% Percentile (z) 2137

99% Percentile (z) 2159 99% Percentile (z) 2161

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2448 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.85

MLE of Mean 2080

MLE of Standard Deviation 42.04

nu sta r 34277

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.574 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2100

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 2100

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2100

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2100

Minnesota UPL Results 8490% Percentile 2134 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2150 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2179 90% UPL 2100

90% Chebyshev UP L 2190

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2133 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2153

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2133

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2161

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2161

2,4

‐ Dinitrotoluene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3620 Minimum 8.194

Maximum 3730 Maximum 8.224

Second Largest 3730 Second Largest 8.224

First Quartile 3675 First Quartile 8.209

Median 3730 Median 8.224

Third Quartile 3730 Third Quartile 8.224

Mean 3699 Mean 8.216

SD 53.67 SD 0.0146

Coefficient of Variation 0.0145

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3824 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% UPL (t) 3781 90% UPL (t) 3782

90% Percentile (z) 3767 90% Percentile (z) 3768

95% Percentile (z) 3787 95% Percentile (z) 3788

99% Percentile (z) 3823 99% Percentile (z) 3826

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3138 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Minnesota UPL Results 85Theta Star 1.178

MLE of Mean 3699

MLE of Standard Deviation 66.02

nu sta r 43939

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3730

90% Percentile 3783 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3808 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3854 90% UPL 3730

90% Chebyshev UP L 3871

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3782 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3813

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3782

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

2

‐ Methylnaphthalen e

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5210 Minimum 8.558

Maximum 5370 Maximum 8.589

Second Largest 5370 Second Largest 8.589

First Quartile 5290 First Quartile 8.573

Median 5370 Median 8.589

Third Quartile 5370 Third Quartile 8.589

Mean 5324 Mean 8.58

SD 78.07 SD 0.0148

Coefficient of Variation 0.0147

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Minnesota UPL Results 86Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5506 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5510

90% UPL (t) 5444 90% UPL (t) 5446

90% Percentile (z) 5424 90% Percentile (z) 5425

95% Percentile (z) 5453 95% Percentile (z) 5455

99% Percentile (z) 5506 99% Percentile (z) 5510

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3074 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.732

MLE of Mean 5324

MLE of Standard Deviation 96.03

nu sta r 43033

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5370

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 5370

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5370

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5370

90% Percentile 5448 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5483 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5550 90% UPL 5370

90% Chebyshev UP L 5575

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5446 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5490

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5446

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5509

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5509

3,3

‐ Dichlorobenzidene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 7510 Minimum 8.924

Maximum 7730 Maximum 8.953

Second Largest 7730 Second Largest 8.953

First Quartile 7620 First Quartile 8.938

Median 7730 Median 8.953

Third Quartile 7730 Third Quartile 8.953

Mean 7667 Mean 8.945

SD 107.3 SD 0.0141

Coefficient of Variation 0.014

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

Minnesota UPL Results 87However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7918 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7923

90% UPL (t) 7832 90% UPL (t) 7835

90% Percentile (z) 7805 90% Percentile (z) 7806

95% Percentile (z) 7844 95% Percentile (z) 7846

99% Percentile (z) 7917 99% Percentile (z) 7922

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3373 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 2.273

MLE of Mean 7667

MLE of Standard Deviation 132

nu sta r 47219

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.58 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 7730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 7730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 7730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7730

90% Percentile 7837 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 7886 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 7978 90% UPL 7730

90% Chebyshev UP L 8011

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7834 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 7895

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7834

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7921

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7921

4

‐ Nitrophenol

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4950 Minimum 8.507

Maximum 5100 Maximum 8.537

Second Largest 5100 Second Largest 8.537

First Quartile 5025 First Quartile 8.522

Median 5100 Median 8.537

Minnesota UPL Results 88Third Quartile 5100 Third Quartile 8.537

Mean 5057 Mean 8.528

SD 73.19 SD 0.0146

Coefficient of Variation 0.0145

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5228 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5231

90% UPL (t) 5170 90% UPL (t) 5171

90% Percentile (z) 5151 90% Percentile (z) 5152

95% Percentile (z) 5178 95% Percentile (z) 5179

99% Percentile (z) 5227 99% Percentile (z) 5231

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3156 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.603

MLE of Mean 5057

MLE of Standard Deviation 90.03

nu sta r 44177

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.579 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5100

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 5100

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5100

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5100

90% Percentile 5173 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5206 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5269 90% UPL 5100

90% Chebyshev UP L 5292

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5171 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5213

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5171

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5230

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5231

Minnesota UPL Results 89Acenaphthene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4680 Minimum 8.451

Maximum 4820 Maximum 8.481

Second Largest 4820 Second Largest 8.481

First Quartile 4750 First Quartile 8.466

Median 4820 Median 8.481

Third Quartile 4820 Third Quartile 8.481

Mean 4780 Mean 8.472

SD 68.31 SD 0.0144

Coefficient of Variation 0.0143

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4939 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4943

90% UPL (t) 4885 90% UPL (t) 4887

90% Percentile (z) 4868 90% Percentile (z) 4868

95% Percentile (z) 4892 95% Percentile (z) 4894

99% Percentile (z) 4939 99% Percentile (z) 4942

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3237 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.477

MLE of Mean 4780

MLE of Standard Deviation 84.02

nu sta r 45313

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.579 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4820

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4820

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4820

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 90Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4820

90% Percentile 4888 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4919 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4978 90% UPL 4820

90% Chebyshev UP L 4999

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4886 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4925

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4886

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4942

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4942

Acenaphthylene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4150 Minimum 8.331

Maximum 4280 Maximum 8.362

Second Largest 4280 Second Largest 8.362

First Quartile 4265 First Quartile 8.358

Median 4280 Median 8.362

Third Quartile 4280 Third Quartile 8.362

Mean 4257 Mean 8.356

SD 48.55 SD 0.0115

Coefficient of Variation 0.0114

Skewness

‐ 2.387

Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.574 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.573

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4370 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4373

90% UPL (t) 4332 90% UPL (t) 4333

90% Percentile (z) 4319 90% Percentile (z) 4320

95% Percentile (z) 4337 95% Percentile (z) 4338

99% Percentile (z) 4370 99% Percentile (z) 4373

Minnesota UPL Results 91Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 5059 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.841

MLE of Mean 4257

MLE of Standard Deviation 59.85

nu sta r 70827

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.381 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4280

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.408 95% Percentile 4280

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4280

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4280

90% Percentile 4334 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4356 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4398 90% UPL 4280

90% Chebyshev UP L 4413

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4333 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4303

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4333

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4372

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4372

Acetophenone

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4060 Minimum 8.309

Maximum 4190 Maximum 8.34

Second Largest 4190 Second Largest 8.34

First Quartile 4125 First Quartile 8.325

Median 4190 Median 8.34

Third Quartile 4190 Third Quartile 8.34

Mean 4153 Mean 8.331

SD 63.43 SD 0.0154

Coefficient of Variation 0.0153

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 92Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4301 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4304

90% UPL (t) 4250 90% UPL (t) 4252

90% Percentile (z) 4234 90% Percentile (z) 4235

95% Percentile (z) 4257 95% Percentile (z) 4259

99% Percentile (z) 4300 99% Percentile (z) 4304

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2832 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.467

MLE of Mean 4153

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.04

nu sta r 39644

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.576 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4190

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4190

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4190

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4190

90% Percentile 4253 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4282 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4337 90% UPL 4190

90% Chebyshev UP L 4356

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4251 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4288

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4252

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

Aniline

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 7060 Minimum 8.862

Maximum 7280 Maximum 8.893

Second Largest 7280 Second Largest 8.893

First Quartile 7170 First Quartile 8.878

Median 7280 Median 8.893

Third Quartile 7280 Third Quartile 8.893

Mean 7217 Mean 8.884

SD 107.3 SD 0.015

Coefficient of Variation 0.0149

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

Minnesota UPL Results 93It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7468 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7473

90% UPL (t) 7382 90% UPL (t) 7385

90% Percentile (z) 7355 90% Percentile (z) 7356

95% Percentile (z) 7394 95% Percentile (z) 7396

99% Percentile (z) 7467 99% Percentile (z) 7472

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2987 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 2.416

MLE of Mean 7217

MLE of Standard Deviation 132.1

nu sta r 41817

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.577 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 7280

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 7280

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 7280

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7280

90% Percentile 7387 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 7436 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 7528 90% UPL 7280

90% Chebyshev UP L 7561

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7384 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 7445

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7384

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7471

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7472

Anthracene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3800 Minimum 8.243

Maximum 3910 Maximum 8.271

Second Largest 3910 Second Largest 8.271

Minnesota UPL Results 94First Quartile 3855 First Quartile 8.257

Median 3910 Median 8.271

Third Quartile 3910 Third Quartile 8.271

Mean 3879 Mean 8.263

SD 53.67 SD 0.0139

Coefficient of Variation 0.0138

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4004 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4006

90% UPL (t) 3961 90% UPL (t) 3962

90% Percentile (z) 3947 90% Percentile (z) 3948

95% Percentile (z) 3967 95% Percentile (z) 3968

99% Percentile (z) 4003 99% Percentile (z) 4006

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3453 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.123

MLE of Mean 3879

MLE of Standard Deviation 66.01

nu sta r 48339

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.581 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3910

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3910

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3910

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3910

90% Percentile 3963 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3988 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4034 90% UPL 3910

90% Chebyshev UP L 4051

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3962 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3993

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3962

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4005

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4006

Minnesota UPL Results 95Benzo(a)anthracene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4150 Minimum 8.331

Maximum 4280 Maximum 8.362

Second Largest 4280 Second Largest 8.362

First Quartile 4215 First Quartile 8.346

Median 4280 Median 8.362

Third Quartile 4280 Third Quartile 8.362

Mean 4243 Mean 8.353

SD 63.43 SD 0.0151

Coefficient of Variation 0.015

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4391 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4394

90% UPL (t) 4340 90% UPL (t) 4342

90% Percentile (z) 4324 90% Percentile (z) 4325

95% Percentile (z) 4347 95% Percentile (z) 4349

99% Percentile (z) 4390 99% Percentile (z) 4394

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2956 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.435

MLE of Mean 4243

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.03

nu sta r 41388

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.577 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4280

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4280

Minnesota UPL Results 965% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4280

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4280

90% Percentile 4343 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4372 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4426 90% UPL 4280

90% Chebyshev UP L 4446

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4341 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4378

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4342

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4393

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4393

Benzo(a)pyrene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3270 Minimum 8.093

Maximum 3370 Maximum 8.123

Second Largest 3370 Second Largest 8.123

First Quartile 3320 First Quartile 8.108

Median 3370 Median 8.123

Third Quartile 3370 Third Quartile 8.123

Mean 3341 Mean 8.114

SD 48.8 SD 0.0147

Coefficient of Variation 0.0146

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3455 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3458

90% UPL (t) 3417 90% UPL (t) 3418

90% Percentile (z) 3404 90% Percentile (z) 3405

95% Percentile (z) 3422 95% Percentile (z) 3423

Minnesota UPL Results 9799% Percentile (z) 3455 99% Percentile (z) 3457

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3099 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.078

MLE of Mean 3341

MLE of Standard Deviation 60.02

nu sta r 43391

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3370

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3370

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3370

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3370

90% Percentile 3419 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3441 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3483 90% UPL 3370

90% Chebyshev UP L 3498

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3417 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3445

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3417

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3457

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3457

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2300 Minimum 7.741

Maximum 2370 Maximum 7.771

Second Largest 2370 Second Largest 7.771

First Quartile 2335 First Quartile 7.756

Median 2370 Median 7.771

Third Quartile 2370 Third Quartile 7.771

Mean 2350 Mean 7.762

SD 34.16 SD 0.0146

Coefficient of Variation 0.0145

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Minnesota UPL Results 98Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2430 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2431

90% UPL (t) 2403 90% UPL (t) 2403

90% Percentile (z) 2394 90% Percentile (z) 2394

95% Percentile (z) 2406 95% Percentile (z) 2407

99% Percentile (z) 2429 99% Percentile (z) 2431

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3129 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.751

MLE of Mean 2350

MLE of Standard Deviation 42.01

nu sta r 43802

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2370

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 2370

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2370

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2370

90% Percentile 2404 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2420 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2449 90% UPL 2370

90% Chebyshev UP L 2460

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2403 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2423

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2403

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2431

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2431

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4590 Minimum 8.432

Maximum 4730 Maximum 8.462

Second Largest 4730 Second Largest 8.462

First Quartile 4660 First Quartile 8.447

Median 4730 Median 8.462

Third Quartile 4730 Third Quartile 8.462

Mean 4690 Mean 8.453

SD 68.31 SD 0.0147

Coefficient of Variation 0.0146

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

Minnesota UPL Results 99There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4849 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4853

90% UPL (t) 4795 90% UPL (t) 4797

90% Percentile (z) 4778 90% Percentile (z) 4779

95% Percentile (z) 4802 95% Percentile (z) 4804

99% Percentile (z) 4849 99% Percentile (z) 4852

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3115 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.505

MLE of Mean 4690

MLE of Standard Deviation 84.03

nu sta r 43615

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4730

90% Percentile 4798 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4829 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4888 90% UPL 4730

90% Chebyshev UP L 4909

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4796 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4835

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4796

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4852

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4852

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5210 Minimum 8.558

Minnesota UPL Results 100Maximum 5370 Maximum 8.589

Second Largest 5370 Second Largest 8.589

First Quartile 5290 First Quartile 8.573

Median 5370 Median 8.589

Third Quartile 5370 Third Quartile 8.589

Mean 5324 Mean 8.58

SD 78.07 SD 0.0148

Coefficient of Variation 0.0147

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5506 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5510

90% UPL (t) 5444 90% UPL (t) 5446

90% Percentile (z) 5424 90% Percentile (z) 5425

95% Percentile (z) 5453 95% Percentile (z) 5455

99% Percentile (z) 5506 99% Percentile (z) 5510

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3074 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.732

MLE of Mean 5324

MLE of Standard Deviation 96.03

nu sta r 43033

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5370

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 5370

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5370

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5370

90% Percentile 5448 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5483 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 5550 90% UPL 5370

90% Chebyshev UP L 5575

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5446 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5490

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5446

Minnesota UPL Results 10190% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5509

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5509

Biphenyl

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3620 Minimum 8.194

Maximum 3730 Maximum 8.224

Second Largest 3730 Second Largest 8.224

First Quartile 3675 First Quartile 8.209

Median 3730 Median 8.224

Third Quartile 3730 Third Quartile 8.224

Mean 3699 Mean 8.216

SD 53.67 SD 0.0146

Coefficient of Variation 0.0145

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3824 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% UPL (t) 3781 90% UPL (t) 3782

90% Percentile (z) 3767 90% Percentile (z) 3768

95% Percentile (z) 3787 95% Percentile (z) 3788

99% Percentile (z) 3823 99% Percentile (z) 3826

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3138 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.178

MLE of Mean 3699

MLE of Standard Deviation 66.02

nu sta r 43939

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 1025% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3730

90% Percentile 3783 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3808 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3854 90% UPL 3730

90% Chebyshev UP L 3871

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3782 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3813

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3782

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

Bis(2

‐ ethylhexyl)phthalat e

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3890 Minimum 8.266

Maximum 4010 Maximum 8.297

Second Largest 4010 Second Largest 8.297

First Quartile 3950 First Quartile 8.281

Median 4010 Median 8.297

Third Quartile 4010 Third Quartile 8.297

Mean 3976 Mean 8.288

SD 58.55 SD 0.0148

Coefficient of Variation 0.0147

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4112 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4115

90% UPL (t) 4066 90% UPL (t) 4067

Minnesota UPL Results 10390% Percentile (z) 4051 90% Percentile (z) 4052

95% Percentile (z) 4072 95% Percentile (z) 4073

99% Percentile (z) 4112 99% Percentile (z) 4115

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3047 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.305

MLE of Mean 3976

MLE of Standard Deviation 72.03

nu sta r 42655

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4010

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4010

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4010

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4010

90% Percentile 4068 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4095 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4145 90% UPL 4010

90% Chebyshev UP L 4164

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4067 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4100

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4067

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4114

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4114

Chrysene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3680 Minimum 8.211

Maximum 4100 Maximum 8.319

Second Largest 4100 Second Largest 8.319

First Quartile 4040 First Quartile 8.304

Median 4100 Median 8.319

Third Quartile 4100 Third Quartile 8.319

Mean 4023 Mean 8.299

SD 157.7 SD 0.0405

Coefficient of Variation 0.0392

Skewness

‐ 2.268

Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

Minnesota UPL Results 104It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.596 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.592

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4391 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4419

90% UPL (t) 4266 90% UPL (t) 4279

90% Percentile (z) 4225 90% Percentile (z) 4234

95% Percentile (z) 4282 95% Percentile (z) 4297

99% Percentile (z) 4390 99% Percentile (z) 4417

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 415.4 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 9.685

MLE of Mean 4023

MLE of Standard Deviation 197.4

nu sta r 5815

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.462 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4100

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.415 95% Percentile 4100

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4100

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4100

90% Percentile 4278 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4353 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4496 90% UPL 4100

90% Chebyshev UP L 4528

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4274 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4190

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4275

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4409

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4411

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4060 Minimum 8.309

Maximum 4190 Maximum 8.34

Second Largest 4190 Second Largest 8.34

First Quartile 4125 First Quartile 8.325

Median 4190 Median 8.34

Third Quartile 4190 Third Quartile 8.34

Mean 4153 Mean 8.331

SD 63.43 SD 0.0154

Coefficient of Variation 0.0153

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Minnesota UPL Results 105Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4301 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4304

90% UPL (t) 4250 90% UPL (t) 4252

90% Percentile (z) 4234 90% Percentile (z) 4235

95% Percentile (z) 4257 95% Percentile (z) 4259

99% Percentile (z) 4300 99% Percentile (z) 4304

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2832 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.467

MLE of Mean 4153

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.04

nu sta r 39644

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.576 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4190

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4190

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4190

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4190

90% Percentile 4253 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4282 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4337 90% UPL 4190

90% Chebyshev UP L 4356

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4251 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4288

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4252

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

Dibenzofurans

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Minnesota UPL Results 106Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4060 Minimum 8.309

Maximum 4190 Maximum 8.34

Second Largest 4190 Second Largest 8.34

First Quartile 4125 First Quartile 8.325

Median 4190 Median 8.34

Third Quartile 4190 Third Quartile 8.34

Mean 4153 Mean 8.331

SD 63.43 SD 0.0154

Coefficient of Variation 0.0153

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4301 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4304

90% UPL (t) 4250 90% UPL (t) 4252

90% Percentile (z) 4234 90% Percentile (z) 4235

95% Percentile (z) 4257 95% Percentile (z) 4259

99% Percentile (z) 4300 99% Percentile (z) 4304

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2832 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.467

MLE of Mean 4153

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.04

nu sta r 39644

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.576 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4190

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4190

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4190

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4190

90% Percentile 4253 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4282 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4337 90% UPL 4190

90% Chebyshev UP L 4356

Minnesota UPL Results 10790% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4251 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4288

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4252

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

Dimethyl phthalate

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4680 Minimum 8.451

Maximum 4820 Maximum 8.481

Second Largest 4820 Second Largest 8.481

First Quartile 4750 First Quartile 8.466

Median 4820 Median 8.481

Third Quartile 4820 Third Quartile 8.481

Mean 4780 Mean 8.472

SD 68.31 SD 0.0144

Coefficient of Variation 0.0143

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4939 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4943

90% UPL (t) 4885 90% UPL (t) 4887

90% Percentile (z) 4868 90% Percentile (z) 4868

95% Percentile (z) 4892 95% Percentile (z) 4894

99% Percentile (z) 4939 99% Percentile (z) 4942

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3237 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.477

MLE of Mean 4780

MLE of Standard Deviation 84.02

nu sta r 45313

Minnesota UPL Results 108A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.579 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4820

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4820

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4820

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4820

90% Percentile 4888 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4919 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4978 90% UPL 4820

90% Chebyshev UP L 4999

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4886 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4925

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4886

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4942

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4942

Fluoranthene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4240 Minimum 8.352

Maximum 4370 Maximum 8.383

Second Largest 4370 Second Largest 8.383

First Quartile 4305 First Quartile 8.367

Median 4370 Median 8.383

Third Quartile 4370 Third Quartile 8.383

Mean 4333 Mean 8.374

SD 63.43 SD 0.0147

Coefficient of Variation 0.0146

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

Minnesota UPL Results 10990% UTL with 90% Coverage 4481 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4484

90% UPL (t) 4430 90% UPL (t) 4432

90% Percentile (z) 4414 90% Percentile (z) 4415

95% Percentile (z) 4437 95% Percentile (z) 4439

99% Percentile (z) 4480 99% Percentile (z) 4484

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3084 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.405

MLE of Mean 4333

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.03

nu sta r 43171

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4370

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4370

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4370

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4370

90% Percentile 4433 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4462 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4516 90% UPL 4370

90% Chebyshev UP L 4536

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4431 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4468

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4432

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4483

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4483

Fluorene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4150 Minimum 8.331

Maximum 4280 Maximum 8.362

Second Largest 4280 Second Largest 8.362

First Quartile 4215 First Quartile 8.346

Median 4280 Median 8.362

Third Quartile 4280 Third Quartile 8.362

Mean 4243 Mean 8.353

SD 63.43 SD 0.0151

Coefficient of Variation 0.015

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Minnesota UPL Results 110Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4391 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4394

90% UPL (t) 4340 90% UPL (t) 4342

90% Percentile (z) 4324 90% Percentile (z) 4325

95% Percentile (z) 4347 95% Percentile (z) 4349

99% Percentile (z) 4390 99% Percentile (z) 4394

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2956 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.435

MLE of Mean 4243

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.03

nu sta r 41388

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.577 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4280

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4280

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4280

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4280

90% Percentile 4343 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4372 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4426 90% UPL 4280

90% Chebyshev UP L 4446

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4341 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4378

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4342

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4393

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4393

Hexachlorobenzene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4240 Minimum 8.352

Maximum 4370 Maximum 8.383

Second Largest 4370 Second Largest 8.383

First Quartile 4305 First Quartile 8.367

Median 4370 Median 8.383

Third Quartile 4370 Third Quartile 8.383

Mean 4333 Mean 8.374

SD 63.43 SD 0.0147

Coefficient of Variation 0.0146

Minnesota UPL Results 111Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4481 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4484

90% UPL (t) 4430 90% UPL (t) 4432

90% Percentile (z) 4414 90% Percentile (z) 4415

95% Percentile (z) 4437 95% Percentile (z) 4439

99% Percentile (z) 4480 99% Percentile (z) 4484

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3084 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.405

MLE of Mean 4333

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.03

nu sta r 43171

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4370

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4370

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4370

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4370

90% Percentile 4433 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4462 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4516 90% UPL 4370

90% Chebyshev UP L 4536

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4431 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4468

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4432

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4483

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4483

Hexachlorobutadiene

General Statistic s

Minnesota UPL Results 112Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4860 Minimum 8.489

Maximum 5000 Maximum 8.517

Second Largest 5000 Second Largest 8.517

First Quartile 4930 First Quartile 8.503

Median 5000 Median 8.517

Third Quartile 5000 Third Quartile 8.517

Mean 4960 Mean 8.509

SD 68.31 SD 0.0139

Coefficient of Variation 0.0138

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5119 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5123

90% UPL (t) 5065 90% UPL (t) 5067

90% Percentile (z) 5048 90% Percentile (z) 5048

95% Percentile (z) 5072 95% Percentile (z) 5074

99% Percentile (z) 5119 99% Percentile (z) 5122

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3486 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.423

MLE of Mean 4960

MLE of Standard Deviation 84.01

nu sta r 48805

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.581 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 5000

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 5000

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 5000

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5000

90% Percentile 5068 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 5099 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

Minnesota UPL Results 11399% Percentile 5158 90% UPL 5000

90% Chebyshev UP L 5179

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 5066 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5105

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 5066

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5121

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5122

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3000 Minimum 8.006

Maximum 3100 Maximum 8.039

Second Largest 3100 Second Largest 8.039

First Quartile 3050 First Quartile 8.023

Median 3100 Median 8.039

Third Quartile 3100 Third Quartile 8.039

Mean 3071 Mean 8.03

SD 48.8 SD 0.016

Coefficient of Variation 0.0159

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3185 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3188

90% UPL (t) 3147 90% UPL (t) 3148

90% Percentile (z) 3134 90% Percentile (z) 3135

95% Percentile (z) 3152 95% Percentile (z) 3153

99% Percentile (z) 3185 99% Percentile (z) 3188

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2617 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.174

MLE of Mean 3071

Minnesota UPL Results 114MLE of Standard Deviation 60.04

nu sta r 36634

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.575 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3100

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3100

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3100

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3100

90% Percentile 3149 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3171 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3213 90% UPL 3100

90% Chebyshev UP L 3228

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3147 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3175

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3147

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3187

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3187

Hexachloroethane

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2740 Minimum 7.916

Maximum 2820 Maximum 7.944

Second Largest 2820 Second Largest 7.944

First Quartile 2780 First Quartile 7.93

Median 2820 Median 7.944

Third Quartile 2820 Third Quartile 7.944

Mean 2797 Mean 7.936

SD 39.04 SD 0.014

Coefficient of Variation 0.014

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 115Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2888 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2890

90% UPL (t) 2857 90% UPL (t) 2858

90% Percentile (z) 2847 90% Percentile (z) 2848

95% Percentile (z) 2861 95% Percentile (z) 2862

99% Percentile (z) 2888 99% Percentile (z) 2890

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3395 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.824

MLE of Mean 2797

MLE of Standard Deviation 48.01

nu sta r 47529

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.58 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 2820

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 2820

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 2820

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2820

90% Percentile 2859 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 2877 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 2910 90% UPL 2820

90% Chebyshev UP L 2922

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 2858 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2880

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2858

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2889

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2890

Indeno(1,2,3

‐ cd)pyrene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3620 Minimum 8.194

Maximum 3730 Maximum 8.224

Second Largest 3730 Second Largest 8.224

First Quartile 3675 First Quartile 8.209

Median 3730 Median 8.224

Third Quartile 3730 Third Quartile 8.224

Mean 3699 Mean 8.216

SD 53.67 SD 0.0146

Coefficient of Variation 0.0145

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Minnesota UPL Results 116Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3824 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% UPL (t) 3781 90% UPL (t) 3782

90% Percentile (z) 3767 90% Percentile (z) 3768

95% Percentile (z) 3787 95% Percentile (z) 3788

99% Percentile (z) 3823 99% Percentile (z) 3826

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3138 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.178

MLE of Mean 3699

MLE of Standard Deviation 66.02

nu sta r 43939

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.578 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3730

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3730

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3730

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3730

90% Percentile 3783 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3808 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3854 90% UPL 3730

90% Chebyshev UP L 3871

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3782 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3813

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3782

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3826

Naphthalene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4330 Minimum 8.373

Maximum 4460 Maximum 8.403

Second Largest 4460 Second Largest 8.403

First Quartile 4395 First Quartile 8.388

Median 4460 Median 8.403

Third Quartile 4460 Third Quartile 8.403

Mean 4423 Mean 8.394

Minnesota UPL Results 117SD 63.43 SD 0.0144

Coefficient of Variation 0.0143

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4571 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4574

90% UPL (t) 4520 90% UPL (t) 4522

90% Percentile (z) 4504 90% Percentile (z) 4505

95% Percentile (z) 4527 95% Percentile (z) 4529

99% Percentile (z) 4570 99% Percentile (z) 4573

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3214 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.376

MLE of Mean 4423

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.02

nu sta r 44991

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.579 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4460

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4460

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4460

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4460

90% Percentile 4523 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4552 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4606 90% UPL 4460

90% Chebyshev UP L 4626

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4521 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4558

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4521

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4573

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4573

Nitrobenzene

Minnesota UPL Results 118General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3450 Minimum 8.146

Maximum 3550 Maximum 8.175

Second Largest 3550 Second Largest 8.175

First Quartile 3500 First Quartile 8.16

Median 3550 Median 8.175

Third Quartile 3550 Third Quartile 8.175

Mean 3521 Mean 8.167

SD 48.8 SD 0.0139

Coefficient of Variation 0.0139

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3635 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3638

90% UPL (t) 3597 90% UPL (t) 3598

90% Percentile (z) 3584 90% Percentile (z) 3585

95% Percentile (z) 3602 95% Percentile (z) 3603

99% Percentile (z) 3635 99% Percentile (z) 3637

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3444 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.023

MLE of Mean 3521

MLE of Standard Deviation 60.01

nu sta r 48214

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.581 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3550

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3550

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3550

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3550

Minnesota UPL Results 11990% Percentile 3599 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3621 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3663 90% UPL 3550

90% Chebyshev UP L 3678

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3597 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3625

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3597

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3637

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3637

Pentachlorophenol

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3190 Minimum 8.068

Maximum 134000 Maximum 11.81

Second Largest 8970 Second Largest 9.102

First Quartile 5715 First Quartile 8.542

Median 8820 Median 9.085

Third Quartile 8955 Third Quartile 9.1

Mean 25050 Mean 9.178

SD 48114 SD 1.253

Coefficient of Variation 1.921

Skewness 2.629

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.501 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.748

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 137301 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 179905

90% UPL (t) 99106 90% UPL (t) 66550

90% Percentile (z) 86711 90% Percentile (z) 48194

95% Percentile (z) 104191 95% Percentile (z) 75971

99% Percentile (z) 136981 99% Percentile (z) 178412

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.463 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 54136

MLE of Mean 25050

Minnesota UPL Results 120MLE of Standard Deviation 36825

nu sta r 6.478

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.311 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.743 90% Percentile 58982

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.461 95% Percentile 96491

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.325 99% Percentile 126498

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 134000

90% Percentile 68847 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 134000

95% Percentile 98911 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 134000

99% Percentile 173401 90% UPL 134000

90% Chebyshev UP L 179359

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 77797 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 13815

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 74699

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 146336

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 150371

Phenanthrene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3710 Minimum 8.219

Maximum 3820 Maximum 8.248

Second Largest 3820 Second Largest 8.248

First Quartile 3765 First Quartile 8.233

Median 3820 Median 8.248

Third Quartile 3820 Third Quartile 8.248

Mean 3789 Mean 8.24

SD 53.67 SD 0.0143

Coefficient of Variation 0.0142

Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Minnesota UPL Results 121Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3914 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3916

90% UPL (t) 3871 90% UPL (t) 3872

90% Percentile (z) 3857 90% Percentile (z) 3858

95% Percentile (z) 3877 95% Percentile (z) 3878

99% Percentile (z) 3913 99% Percentile (z) 3916

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3294 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.15

MLE of Mean 3789

MLE of Standard Deviation 66.01

nu sta r 46112

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.58 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 3820

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 3820

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 3820

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3820

90% Percentile 3873 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 3898 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 3944 90% UPL 3820

90% Chebyshev UP L 3961

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 3872 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3903

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 3872

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3915

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 3916

Phenol

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4190 Minimum 8.34

Maximum 15200 Maximum 9.629

Second Largest 13900 Second Largest 9.54

First Quartile 4905 First Quartile 8.494

Median 5650 Median 8.639

Third Quartile 13850 Third Quartile 9.536

Mean 8936 Mean 8.953

SD 5062 SD 0.584

Coefficient of Variation 0.567

Skewness 0.369

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Minnesota UPL Results 122Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.774 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.8

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 20746 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 30219

90% UPL (t) 16728 90% UPL (t) 19001

90% Percentile (z) 15424 90% Percentile (z) 16345

95% Percentile (z) 17263 95% Percentile (z) 20212

99% Percentile (z) 20713 99% Percentile (z) 30102

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.154 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 4149

MLE of Mean 8936

MLE of Standard Deviation 6089

nu sta r 30.15

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.812 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.711 90% Percentile 14420

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.306 95% Percentile 14810

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.313 99% Percentile 15122

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 15200

90% Percentile 17081 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 15200

95% Percentile 20709 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 15200

99% Percentile 28720 90% UPL 15200

90% Chebyshev UP L 25172

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 17939 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 27268

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 18164

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 25190

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 26147

Pyrene

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 4060 Minimum 8.309

Maximum 4190 Maximum 8.34

Second Largest 4190 Second Largest 8.34

First Quartile 4125 First Quartile 8.325

Median 4190 Median 8.34

Third Quartile 4190 Third Quartile 8.34

Mean 4153 Mean 8.331

SD 63.43 SD 0.0154

Coefficient of Variation 0.0153

Minnesota UPL Results 123Skewness

‐ 1.23

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.601

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4301 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4304

90% UPL (t) 4250 90% UPL (t) 4252

90% Percentile (z) 4234 90% Percentile (z) 4235

95% Percentile (z) 4257 95% Percentile (z) 4259

99% Percentile (z) 4300 99% Percentile (z) 4304

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2832 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.467

MLE of Mean 4153

MLE of Standard Deviation 78.04

nu sta r 39644

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.576 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 4190

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.451 95% Percentile 4190

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 4190

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 4190

90% Percentile 4253 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 4282 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 4337 90% UPL 4190

90% Chebyshev UP L 4356

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4251 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 4288

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4252

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 4303

Total Metals

General Statistic s

Minnesota UPL Results 124Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 75.18 Minimum 4.32

Maximum 295.9 Maximum 5.69

Second Largest 281.2 Second Largest 5.639

First Quartile 86.69 First Quartile 4.462

Median 92.47 Median 4.527

Third Quartile 193.8 Third Quartile 5.153

Mean 146.4 Mean 4.824

SD 97.68 SD 0.584

Coefficient of Variation 0.667

Skewness 1.2

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.695 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.753

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 374.3 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 485.6

90% UPL (t) 296.7 90% UPL (t) 305.6

90% Percentile (z) 271.5 90% Percentile (z) 262.9

95% Percentile (z) 307 95% Percentile (z) 325

99% Percentile (z) 373.6 99% Percentile (z) 483.7

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.947 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 75.18

MLE of Mean 146.4

MLE of Standard Deviation 104.9

nu sta r 27.26

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.037 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.712 90% Percentile 287.1

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.353 95% Percentile 291.5

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.314 99% Percentile 295.1

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 295.9

90% Percentile 286.5 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 295.9

95% Percentile 350.1 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 295.9

99% Percentile 491.6 90% UPL 295.9

90% Chebyshev UP L 459.6

Minnesota UPL Results 12590% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 301.4 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 354.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 302.2

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 429.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 440.4

Total Halogens

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 101 Minimum 4.615

Maximum 161 Maximum 5.081

Second Largest 142 Second Largest 4.956

First Quartile 102 First Quartile 4.625

Median 125 Median 4.828

Third Quartile 141.5 Third Quartile 4.952

Mean 124.9 Mean 4.811

SD 24.07 SD 0.192

Coefficient of Variation 0.193

Skewness 0.318

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.87 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.861

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 181 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 192.3

90% UPL (t) 161.9 90% UPL (t) 165.1

90% Percentile (z) 155.7 90% Percentile (z) 157.2

95% Percentile (z) 164.4 95% Percentile (z) 168.5

99% Percentile (z) 180.8 99% Percentile (z) 192.1

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 18.24 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 6.846

MLE of Mean 124.9

MLE of Standard Deviation 29.24

nu sta r 255.3

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.535 Nonparametric Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 1265% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.707 90% Percentile 149.6

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.28 95% Percentile 155.3

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 159.9

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 161

90% Percentile 163.5 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 161

95% Percentile 176.5 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 161

99% Percentile 202.7 90% UPL 161

90% Chebyshev UP L 202

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 163.9 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 200.8

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 164.2

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 187.7

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 188.8

Total VOC

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 697.5 Minimum 6.547

Maximum 827.7 Maximum 6.719

Second Largest 813.7 Second Largest 6.702

First Quartile 736.8 First Quartile 6.602

Median 780.2 Median 6.66

Third Quartile 801.1 Third Quartile 6.686

Mean 768.7 Mean 6.643

SD 48.78 SD 0.0643

Coefficient of Variation 0.0635

Skewness

‐ 0.465

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.936 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.93

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 882.5 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 891.5

90% UPL (t) 843.8 90% UPL (t) 847.2

90% Percentile (z) 831.2 90% Percentile (z) 833.3

95% Percentile (z) 849 95% Percentile (z) 853

Minnesota UPL Results 12799% Percentile (z) 882.2 99% Percentile (z) 891.1

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 163 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 4.717

MLE of Mean 768.7

MLE of Standard Deviation 60.22

nu sta r 2282

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.306 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 819.3

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.178 95% Percentile 823.5

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 826.9

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 827.7

90% Percentile 846.8 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 827.7

95% Percentile 870.4 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 827.7

99% Percentile 915.7 90% UPL 827.7

90% Chebyshev UP L 925.2

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 846 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 897.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 846.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 888.3

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 889.1

Total SVOC

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 160490 Minimum 11.99

Maximum 288010 Maximum 12.57

Second Largest 177250 Second Largest 12.09

First Quartile 164095 First Quartile 12.01

Median 170700 Median 12.05

Third Quartile 176490 Third Quartile 12.08

Mean 185767 Mean 12.11

SD 45561 SD 0.206

Coefficient of Variation 0.245

Skewness 2.531

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Minnesota UPL Results 128Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.589 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.63

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 292060 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 294382

90% UPL (t) 255892 90% UPL (t) 249949

90% Percentile (z) 244155 90% Percentile (z) 237024

95% Percentile (z) 260708 95% Percentile (z) 255454

99% Percentile (z) 291757 99% Percentile (z) 293978

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 14.14 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 13135

MLE of Mean 185767

MLE of Standard Deviation 49397

nu sta r 198

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.339 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.707 90% Percentile 221554

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.422 95% Percentile 254782

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 281364

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 288010

90% Percentile 251214 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 288010

95% Percentile 273774 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 288010

99% Percentile 319530 90% UPL 288010

90% Chebyshev UP L 331886

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 252006 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 195083

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 251498

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 293436

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 293654

Minnesota UPL Results 129MDL

Component s as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free

‐‐

‐‐

‐‐ 7600 7620 7310 7140

Metals (mg/kg)

0.08

0.12

0.008

0.007

0.02

0.04

0.13

0.009

0.003

0.04

0.27

Total Metals (mg/kg)

‐‐

Formaldehyde (  g/kg)

420

Ions

40

6

Total Halogens (mg/kg)

‐‐

* All 90% UPL Results reported as Normal MRL

= Method Reporting Limit

** 90% UPL Result reported as Lognormal MDL

= Method Detection Limit = Nondetect; Reported as MDL

*** 90% UPL Result Non

‐ Parametric HAP = Hazardous Air Pollutant

‐‐ = Non

‐ Detect OH = Organic Halogen

n.d.

= Only 1 Distinct Value, therefore no variance. N = Nitrogenated 

# Wash

1120.0 797.0 697.0 1340.0 Fluorine (mg/kg)

‐‐ ‐‐ 37 Selenium (HAP)

‐‐ ‐‐ 0.6

Formaldehyde

Chlorine (mg/kg) 1120 797 660

‐‐ 1340 49000 130000 46000 46000 10.6 5.5 12.2

‐‐

121.6 96.1 114.2 97.5 Nickel (HAP) 2.65 1.26 2.93 Lead (HAP) 26

2.16 0.0284 Mercury (HAP) 0.143 0.0188 0.0778 Manganese (HAP) 54.6 62.6 79.3 69.4 1.34 Cobalt (HAP) 0.83 0.77 1.37 5.51 0.33

Chromium (HAP) 12.3 10.2 10.8 Cadmium (HAP) 0.26 0.27 0.31 Beryllium (HAP) 0.03 0.03 0.17 0.08 4.2 2.9

3.6 Arsenic (HAP) 8.2 6.8 8.9 Antimony (HAP) 16.6 3.6 Sulfur (wt%) 0.455 0.516 0.608 0.625 0.76

Heating Value (BTU/lb) 1.26 0.7 Nitrogen (wt%) 0.77 21

‐ Mar 22

‐ Mar 23

‐ Mar 26

‐ Mar

Washington C&D Summary Table 130Non

‐

Detect Average

as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free as received Moist. Free

0 0.63

0 0.49

6820 7170 7920 6460 6770 7900 0 7271.00

0 4.47

0 10.42

0 0.088

0 0.31

0 16.27

0 1.16

0 10.60

0 74.66

0 0.06

0 3.47

7 0.60

‐‐ 121.68

0 61100.00

0 908.40

6 43.25

‐‐ 925.70 

# ington C&D SUMMARY

0.67

3.8

56.3

0.0367

1.29

‐‐ 0.0632

4.18

516

47 35000 76.1 0.0733

2.74

‐‐

121.9

62000 0.63

7

90.5 0.61

7.4

34.3

1.58

13.2

127 0.27

0.136

42 597 1530 179

‐‐

179.0 2007.0 1530.0 29000

385.0 563.0 639.0 1960 385 44000

‐‐ ‐‐ 47 60000 105.0 ‐‐

110000 210.5 11.6 7.8 8.3

0.6 0.6

‐‐

167.7 106.1 0.0468 0.0614

12.2 0.051 65.5 63.1 78.3

2.78 2.49 7.2 2.4 1.8

6.86 0.6

6.3

1.18 0.78 1.63 1.45 0.26

46 14.4 15.1 0.51 0.07 13.2

0.11 0.04 0.05 0.13 14.3

0.34 5.1 11.6

0.32 3.5

26.2

0.17

0.33 1.7

0.18 0.394 0.355 0.486 0.731 28

‐ Mar 3

‐ Apr 29

‐ Mar 30

‐ Mar

0.55 0.42 0.55 0.39 27

‐ Mar 2

‐ Apr

Washington C&D Summary Table 131*all results reported as moisture free

*all results pooled from all 7 samples

Standard

Deviation Low High

0.28 0.27 1.26 1.03

0.17 0.14 0.731 0.738

493.05 6820 7900 7986

4.64 0.60 16.6 11.28**

6.54 3.60 26.2 19.91

0.054 0.030 0.17 0.167

0.09 0.18 0.51 0.435

13.26 5.51 46 34.56**

0.37 0.67 1.63 1.69

6.20 3.8 26.0 20.05**

21.49 54.6 127 104.4**

0.03 0.019 0.143 0.110

3.18 1.26 12.2 6.971**

0.00 0.60 0.6 n.d.

39.3 76.11 210.52 178.7

32908.80 29000 130000 108359**

563.16 179 1960 1725.0

4.79 37 47 n.d.

565.32 179.00 2007 1746.0 Range 90% UPL

Results*

Washington C&D Summary Table 132Nitrogen (wt%) Sulfur (wt%) Heating Value (BTU/lb) Antimony (HAP ) Arsenic (HAP) Beryllium (HAP) Cadmium (HA P Chromium (HAP) Cobalt (HAP)

0.77 0.455 7600 16.6 8.2 0.03 0.26 12.3 0.83

1.26 0.516 7620 3.6 6.8 0.03 0.27 10.2 0.77

0.7 0.608 7310 4.2 8.9 0.17 0.31 10.8 1.37

0.76 0.625 7140 2.9 3.6 0.08 0.33 5.51 1.34

0.55 0.486 6820 2.4 14.3 0.11 0.51 46 1.63

0.39 0.394 7170 1.8 11.6 0.04 0.34 14.4 1.18

0.27 0.136 7920 0.6 6.3 0.07 0.18 6.86 0.67

0.42 0.731 6460 3.5 26.2 0.17 0.33 34.3 1.58

0.63 0.61 6770 7.4 5.1 0.13 0.32 7.2 1.45

0.55 0.355 7900 1.7 13.2 0.05 0.26 15.1 0.78

Washington ProUCL Entry 133Lead (HAP) Manganese (HAP) Mercury (HAP) Nickel (HAP) Selenium (HAP ) Formaldehyde Chlorine (mg/kg) Fluorine (mg/kg) Total Metals ( Total Halogens (mg/kg)

26 54.6 0.143 2.65 49000 1120 121.613 1120

10.6 62.6 0.0188 1.26 130000 797 96.1488 797

5.5 79.3 0.0778 2.93 0.6 46000 660 37 114.1578 697

12.2 69.4 0.0284 2.16 46000 1340 97.5484 1340

11.6 78.3 0.051 12.2 0.6 29000 1960 47 167.701 2007

7.8 65.5 0.0468 2.78 0.6 60000 1530 106.0868 1530

3.8 56.3 0.0367 1.29 35000 179 76.1067 179

13.2 127 0.0632 4.18 44000 516 47 210.5232 563

7 90.5 0.0733 2.74 62000 597 42 121.9133 639

8.3 63.1 0.0614 2.49 110000 385 105.0414 385

Washington ProUCL Entry 134Nitrogen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 9

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.27 Minimum

‐ 1.309

Maximum 1.26 Maximum 0.231

Second Largest 0.77 Second Largest

‐ 0.261

First Quartile 0.453 First Quartile

‐ 0.8

Median 0.59 Median

‐ 0.53

Third Quartile 0.745 Third Quartile

‐ 0.295

Mean 0.63 Mean

‐ 0.544

SD 0.275 SD 0.428

Coefficient of Variation 0.437

Skewness 1.228

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.909 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.978

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.199 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.406

90% UPL (t) 1.029 90% UPL (t) 1.08

90% Percentile (z) 0.983 90% Percentile (z) 1.005

95% Percentile (z) 1.083 95% Percentile (z) 1.174

99% Percentile (z) 1.271 99% Percentile (z) 1.572

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 4.463 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.141

MLE of Mean 0.63

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.298

nu sta r 89.26

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.222 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.728 90% Percentile 0.819

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.157 95% Percentile 1.04

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.267 99% Percentile 1.216

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.26

90% Percentile 1.03 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.26

95% Percentile 1.187 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.26

99% Percentile 1.521 90% UPL 1.211

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.496

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.049 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1.184

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.055

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.296

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.317

Sulfu r

Washington UPL Results 135General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.136 Minimum

‐ 1.995

Maximum 0.731 Maximum

‐ 0.313

Second Largest 0.625 Second Largest

‐ 0.47

First Quartile 0.409 First Quartile

‐ 0.895

Median 0.501 Median

‐ 0.692

Third Quartile 0.61 Third Quartile

‐ 0.495

Mean 0.492 Mean

‐ 0.791

SD 0.17 SD 0.478

Coefficient of Variation 0.345

Skewness

‐ 0.828

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.951 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.8

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.842 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.217

90% UPL (t) 0.738 90% UPL (t) 0.907

90% Percentile (z) 0.709 90% Percentile (z) 0.837

95% Percentile (z) 0.771 95% Percentile (z) 0.995

99% Percentile (z) 0.886 99% Percentile (z) 1.379

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 4.516 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.109

MLE of Mean 0.492

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.231

nu sta r 90.33

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.567 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.728 90% Percentile 0.636

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.176 95% Percentile 0.683

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.267 99% Percentile 0.721

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.731

90% Percentile 0.801 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.731

95% Percentile 0.923 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.731

99% Percentile 1.182 90% UPL 0.72

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.026

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.818 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.91

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.835

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.008

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.046

Heating Value

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Washington UPL Results 136Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6460 Minimum 8.773

Maximum 7920 Maximum 8.977

Second Largest 7900 Second Largest 8.975

First Quartile 6900 First Quartile 8.839

Median 7240 Median 8.887

Third Quartile 7615 Third Quartile 8.938

Mean 7271 Mean 8.89

SD 493.1 SD 0.0683

Coefficient of Variation 0.0678

Skewness

‐ 0.178

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.952 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.95

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8290 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8356

90% UPL (t) 7986 90% UPL (t) 8012

90% Percentile (z) 7903 90% Percentile (z) 7920

95% Percentile (z) 8082 95% Percentile (z) 8119

99% Percentile (z) 8418 99% Percentile (z) 8506

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 167.6 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 43.39

MLE of Mean 7271

MLE of Standard Deviation 561.7

nu sta r 3352

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.254 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.724 90% Percentile 7902

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.162 95% Percentile 7911

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.266 99% Percentile 7918

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7920

90% Percentile 7999 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 7920

95% Percentile 8219 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 7920

99% Percentile 8641 90% UPL 7918

90% Chebyshev UP L 8822

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 8003 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 8688

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 8005

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8332

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8338

Antimony

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.6 Minimum

‐ 0.511

Washington UPL Results 137Maximum 16.6 Maximum 2.809

Second Largest 7.4 Second Largest 2.001

First Quartile 1.95 First Quartile 0.66

Median 3.2 Median 1.159

Third Quartile 4.05 Third Quartile 1.397

Mean 4.47 Mean 1.133

SD 4.643 SD 0.89

Coefficient of Variation 1.039

Skewness 2.355

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.711 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.969

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 14.06 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 19.51

90% UPL (t) 11.2 90% UPL (t) 11.28

90% Percentile (z) 10.42 90% Percentile (z) 9.709

95% Percentile (z) 12.11 95% Percentile (z) 13.41

99% Percentile (z) 15.27 99% Percentile (z) 24.6

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.128 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 3.962

MLE of Mean 4.47

MLE of Standard Deviation 4.209

nu sta r 22.56

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.427 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.739 90% Percentile 8.32

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.221 95% Percentile 12.46

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.271 99% Percentile 15.77

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 16.6

90% Percentile 9.991 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 16.6

95% Percentile 12.84 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 16.6

99% Percentile 19.38 90% UPL 15.68

90% Chebyshev UP L 19.08

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 10.56 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 7.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 10.62

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 15.27

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 15.85

Arsenic

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.6 Minimum 1.281

Maximum 26.2 Maximum 3.266

Second Largest 14.3 Second Largest 2.66

First Quartile 6.425 First Quartile 1.86

Washington UPL Results 138Median 8.55 Median 2.145

Third Quartile 12.8 Third Quartile 2.548

Mean 10.42 Mean 2.192

SD 6.543 SD 0.572

Coefficient of Variation 0.628

Skewness 1.691

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.849 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.988

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 23.94 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 29.17

90% UPL (t) 19.91 90% UPL (t) 20.51

90% Percentile (z) 18.81 90% Percentile (z) 18.62

95% Percentile (z) 21.18 95% Percentile (z) 22.92

99% Percentile (z) 25.64 99% Percentile (z) 33.85

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.476 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 4.208

MLE of Mean 10.42

MLE of Standard Deviation 6.622

nu sta r 49.53

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.223 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.731 90% Percentile 15.49

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.141 95% Percentile 20.85

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.268 99% Percentile 25.13

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 26.2

90% Percentile 19.29 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 26.2

95% Percentile 23.14 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 26.2

99% Percentile 31.56 90% UPL 25.01

90% Chebyshev UP L 31.01

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 19.92 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 22.36

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 20.01

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 26.07

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 26.63

Beryllium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 8

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.03 Minimum

‐ 3.507

Maximum 0.17 Maximum

‐ 1.772

Second Largest 0.17 Second Largest

‐ 1.772

First Quartile 0.0425 First Quartile

‐ 3.163

Median 0.075 Median

‐ 2.592

Third Quartile 0.125 Third Quartile

‐ 2.082

Mean 0.088 Mean

‐ 2.62

Washington UPL Results 139SD 0.0543 SD 0.669

Coefficient of Variation 0.617

Skewness 0.542

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.886 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.916

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.29

90% UPL (t) 0.167 90% UPL (t) 0.192

90% Percentile (z) 0.158 90% Percentile (z) 0.172

95% Percentile (z) 0.177 95% Percentile (z) 0.219

99% Percentile (z) 0.214 99% Percentile (z) 0.345

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.018 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0436

MLE of Mean 0.088

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.062

nu sta r 40.35

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.342 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.733 90% Percentile 0.17

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.143 95% Percentile 0.17

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.269 99% Percentile 0.17

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.17

90% Percentile 0.171 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.17

95% Percentile 0.208 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.17

99% Percentile 0.291 90% UPL 0.17

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.259

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.178 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.249

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.181

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.239

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.248

Camium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 8

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.18 Minimum

‐ 1.715

Maximum 0.51 Maximum

‐ 0.673

Second Largest 0.34 Second Largest

‐ 1.079

First Quartile 0.263 First Quartile

‐ 1.338

Median 0.315 Median

‐ 1.155

Third Quartile 0.33 Third Quartile

‐ 1.109

Mean 0.311 Mean

‐ 1.2

SD 0.0852 SD 0.265

Coefficient of Variation 0.274

Washington UPL Results 140Skewness 1.2

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.871 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.919

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.487 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.521

90% UPL (t) 0.435 90% UPL (t) 0.443

90% Percentile (z) 0.42 90% Percentile (z) 0.423

95% Percentile (z) 0.451 95% Percentile (z) 0.466

99% Percentile (z) 0.509 99% Percentile (z) 0.558

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 11.16 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0279

MLE of Mean 0.311

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0931

nu sta r 223.2

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.509 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.725 90% Percentile 0.357

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.229 95% Percentile 0.434

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.266 99% Percentile 0.495

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.51

90% Percentile 0.435 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.51

95% Percentile 0.478 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.51

99% Percentile 0.567 90% UPL 0.493

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.579

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.438 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.431

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.439

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.505

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.508

Chromium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5.51 Minimum 1.707

Maximum 46 Maximum 3.829

Second Largest 34.3 Second Largest 3.535

First Quartile 7.95 First Quartile 2.061

Median 11.55 Median 2.445

Third Quartile 14.93 Third Quartile 2.703

Mean 16.27 Mean 2.556

SD 13.26 SD 0.68

Coefficient of Variation 0.815

Skewness 1.719

Washington UPL Results 141Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.753 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.917

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.67 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 52.52

90% UPL (t) 35.5 90% UPL (t) 34.56

90% Percentile (z) 33.26 90% Percentile (z) 30.81

95% Percentile (z) 38.08 95% Percentile (z) 39.44

99% Percentile (z) 47.12 99% Percentile (z) 62.69

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.677 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 9.699

MLE of Mean 16.27

MLE of Standard Deviation 12.56

nu sta r 33.55

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.633 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.735 90% Percentile 35.47

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.256 95% Percentile 40.74

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.269 99% Percentile 44.95

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 46

90% Percentile 32.99 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 46

95% Percentile 40.84 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 46

99% Percentile 58.42 90% UPL 44.83

90% Chebyshev UP L 58

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 34.42 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 25.39

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 34.39

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 47.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 48.15

Cobalt

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.67 Minimum

‐ 0.4

Maximum 1.63 Maximum 0.489

Second Largest 1.58 Second Largest 0.457

First Quartile 0.793 First Quartile

‐ 0.233

Median 1.26 Median 0.229

Third Quartile 1.43 Third Quartile 0.357

Mean 1.16 Mean 0.0994

SD 0.366 SD 0.337

Coefficient of Variation 0.315

Skewness

‐ 0.143

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.887 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.873

Washington UPL Results 142Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.916 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2.218

90% UPL (t) 1.69 90% UPL (t) 1.802

90% Percentile (z) 1.629 90% Percentile (z) 1.702

95% Percentile (z) 1.762 95% Percentile (z) 1.924

99% Percentile (z) 2.011 99% Percentile (z) 2.421

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 7.32 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.158

MLE of Mean 1.16

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.429

nu sta r 146.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.617 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.725 90% Percentile 1.585

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.22 95% Percentile 1.608

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.267 99% Percentile 1.626

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.63

90% Percentile 1.732 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.63

95% Percentile 1.943 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.63

99% Percentile 2.382 90% UPL 1.625

90% Chebyshev UP L 2.311

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.754 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2.386

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.765

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.081

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2.111

Lead

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.8 Minimum 1.335

Maximum 26 Maximum 3.258

Second Largest 13.2 Second Largest 2.58

First Quartile 7.2 First Quartile 1.973

Median 9.45 Median 2.239

Third Quartile 12.05 Third Quartile 2.489

Mean 10.6 Mean 2.231

SD 6.199 SD 0.529

Coefficient of Variation 0.585

Skewness 1.835

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.83 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.977

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Washington UPL Results 143Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 23.41 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 27.78

90% UPL (t) 19.59 90% UPL (t) 20.05

90% Percentile (z) 18.54 90% Percentile (z) 18.34

95% Percentile (z) 20.8 95% Percentile (z) 22.23

99% Percentile (z) 25.02 99% Percentile (z) 31.88

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.868 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 3.695

MLE of Mean 10.6

MLE of Standard Deviation 6.259

nu sta r 57.37

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.278 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.729 90% Percentile 14.48

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.168 95% Percentile 20.24

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.268 99% Percentile 24.85

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 26

90% Percentile 18.99 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 26

95% Percentile 22.53 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 26

99% Percentile 30.24 90% UPL 24.72

90% Chebyshev UP L 30.1

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 19.52 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 19.33

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 19.6

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 25.14

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 25.62

Manganese

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 54.6 Minimum 4

Maximum 127 Maximum 4.844

Second Largest 90.5 Second Largest 4.505

First Quartile 62.73 First Quartile 4.139

Median 67.45 Median 4.211

Third Quartile 79.05 Third Quartile 4.37

Mean 74.66 Mean 4.282

SD 21.49 SD 0.253

Coefficient of Variation 0.288

Skewness 1.806

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.821 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.902

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 119.1 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 122

90% UPL (t) 105.8 90% UPL (t) 104.4

Washington UPL Results 14490% Percentile (z) 102.2 90% Percentile (z) 100

95% Percentile (z) 110 95% Percentile (z) 109.7

99% Percentile (z) 124.6 99% Percentile (z) 130.3

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 11.4 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 6.548

MLE of Mean 74.66

MLE of Standard Deviation 22.11

nu sta r 228

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.496 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.725 90% Percentile 94.15

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.182 95% Percentile 110.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.266 99% Percentile 123.7

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 127

90% Percentile 104 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 127

95% Percentile 114.4 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 127

99% Percentile 135.5 90% UPL 123.4

90% Chebyshev UP L 142.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 104.8 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 103.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 104.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 120.6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 120.9

Mercury

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.0188 Minimum

‐ 3.974

Maximum 0.143 Maximum

‐ 1.945

Second Largest 0.0778 Second Largest

‐ 2.554

First Quartile 0.0392 First Quartile

‐ 3.244

Median 0.0562 Median

‐ 2.883

Third Quartile 0.0708 Third Quartile

‐ 2.65

Mean 0.06 Mean

‐ 2.954

SD 0.0348 SD 0.568

Coefficient of Variation 0.579

Skewness 1.523

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.878 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.982

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.132 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.169

90% UPL (t) 0.11 90% UPL (t) 0.119

90% Percentile (z) 0.105 90% Percentile (z) 0.108

95% Percentile (z) 0.117 95% Percentile (z) 0.133

99% Percentile (z) 0.141 99% Percentile (z) 0.195

Washington UPL Results 145Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.653 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0226

MLE of Mean 0.06

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0369

nu sta r 53.05

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.199 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.73 90% Percentile 0.0843

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.145 95% Percentile 0.114

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.268 99% Percentile 0.137

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.143

90% Percentile 0.109 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.143

95% Percentile 0.131 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.143

99% Percentile 0.177 90% UPL 0.136

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.169

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.113 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.118

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.114

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.147

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.151

Nickel

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.26 Minimum 0.231

Maximum 12.2 Maximum 2.501

Second Largest 4.18 Second Largest 1.43

First Quartile 2.243 First Quartile 0.806

Median 2.695 Median 0.991

Third Quartile 2.893 Third Quartile 1.062

Mean 3.468 Mean 1.018

SD 3.18 SD 0.637

Coefficient of Variation 0.917

Skewness 2.767

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.607 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.858

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 10.04 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 10.32

90% UPL (t) 8.08 90% UPL (t) 6.971

90% Percentile (z) 7.543 90% Percentile (z) 6.26

95% Percentile (z) 8.698 95% Percentile (z) 7.89

99% Percentile (z) 10.87 99% Percentile (z) 12.18

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.725 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Washington UPL Results 146Theta Star 2.01

MLE of Mean 3.468

MLE of Standard Deviation 2.64

nu sta r 34.51

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.959 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.734 90% Percentile 4.982

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.313 95% Percentile 8.591

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.269 99% Percentile 11.48

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 12.2

90% Percentile 6.986 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 12.2

95% Percentile 8.625 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 12.2

99% Percentile 12.3 90% UPL 11.4

90% Chebyshev UP L 13.47

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7.22 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 3.868

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7.14

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9.856

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9.911

Selenium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 3 Number of Distinct Observation s 1

Number of Missing Value s 3

Warning: This data set only has 3 observations!

Data set is too small to compute reliable and meaningful statistics and estimates !

The data set for variable Selenium was not processed!

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations before using these statistical methods !

If possible, compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Formaldehyde

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 9

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 29000 Minimum 10.28

Maximum 130000 Maximum 11.78

Second Largest 110000 Second Largest 11.61

First Quartile 44500 First Quartile 10.7

Median 47500 Median 10.77

Third Quartile 61500 Third Quartile 11.03

Mean 61100 Mean 10.91

SD 32909 SD 0.469

Coefficient of Variation 0.539

Skewness 1.479

Background Statistics

Washington UPL Results 147Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.801 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.914

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 129090 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 144656

90% UPL (t) 108835 90% UPL (t) 108359

90% Percentile (z) 103274 90% Percentile (z) 100096

95% Percentile (z) 115230 95% Percentile (z) 118708

99% Percentile (z) 137657 99% Percentile (z) 163461

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3.421 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 17862

MLE of Mean 61100

MLE of Standard Deviation 33036

nu sta r 68.41

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.627 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.729 90% Percentile 112000

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.227 95% Percentile 121000

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.268 99% Percentile 128200

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 130000

90% Percentile 105398 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 130000

95% Percentile 123566 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 130000

99% Percentile 162678 90% UPL 128000

90% Chebyshev UP L 164645

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 107878 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 87000

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 107912

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 136568

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 138180

Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 179 Minimum 5.187

Maximum 1960 Maximum 7.581

Second Largest 1530 Second Largest 7.333

First Quartile 536.3 First Quartile 6.283

Median 728.5 Median 6.587

Third Quartile 1285 Third Quartile 7.156

Mean 908.4 Mean 6.609

SD 563.2 SD 0.718

Coefficient of Variation 0.62

Skewness 0.664

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.948 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.966

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Washington UPL Results 148Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2072 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3267

90% UPL (t) 1725 90% UPL (t) 2100

90% Percentile (z) 1630 90% Percentile (z) 1860

95% Percentile (z) 1835 95% Percentile (z) 2415

99% Percentile (z) 2219 99% Percentile (z) 3938

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.899 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 478.3

MLE of Mean 908.4

MLE of Standard Deviation 659.2

nu sta r 37.98

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.154 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.733 90% Percentile 1573

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.111 95% Percentile 1767

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.269 99% Percentile 1921

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1960

90% Percentile 1788 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1960

95% Percentile 2190 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1960

99% Percentile 3085 90% UPL 1917

90% Chebyshev UP L 2680

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1872 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2408

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1912

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2525

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2648

Fluoride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 4 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Number of Missing Value s 5

Warning: This data set only has 4 observations!

Data set is too small to compute reliable and meaningful statistics and estimates !

The data set for variable Fluoride was not processed!

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations before using these statistical methods !

If possible, compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Total Metals

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 76.11 Minimum 4.332

Maximum 210.5 Maximum 5.35

Washington UPL Results 149Second Largest 167.7 Second Largest 5.122

First Quartile 99.42 First Quartile 4.599

Median 110.1 Median 4.701

Third Quartile 121.8 Third Quartile 4.803

Mean 121.7 Mean 4.761

SD 39.3 SD 0.29

Coefficient of Variation 0.323

Skewness 1.52

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.843 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.923

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 202.9 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 212.7

90% UPL (t) 178.7 90% UPL (t) 178

90% Percentile (z) 172 90% Percentile (z) 169.4

95% Percentile (z) 186.3 95% Percentile (z) 188.3

99% Percentile (z) 213.1 99% Percentile (z) 229.4

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 8.85 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 13.75

MLE of Mean 121.7

MLE of Standard Deviation 40.9

nu sta r 177

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.547 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.725 90% Percentile 172

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.26 95% Percentile 191.3

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.267 99% Percentile 206.7

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 210.5

90% Percentile 176.2 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 210.5

95% Percentile 195.8 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 210.5

99% Percentile 236.4 90% UPL 206.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 245.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 177.8 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 155.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 177.8

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 208.1

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 209.1

Total Halogens

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 179 Minimum 5.187

Maximum 2007 Maximum 7.604

Second Largest 1530 Second Largest 7.333

First Quartile 582 First Quartile 6.365

Median 747 Median 6.614

Washington UPL Results 150Third Quartile 1285 Third Quartile 7.156

Mean 925.7 Mean 6.632

SD 565.3 SD 0.714

Coefficient of Variation 0.611

Skewness 0.695

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.952 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.962

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.842

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2094 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 3318

90% UPL (t) 1746 90% UPL (t) 2138

90% Percentile (z) 1650 90% Percentile (z) 1895

95% Percentile (z) 1856 95% Percentile (z) 2456

99% Percentile (z) 2241 99% Percentile (z) 3996

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.938 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 477.6

MLE of Mean 925.7

MLE of Standard Deviation 664.9

nu sta r 38.76

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.15 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.733 90% Percentile 1578

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.112 95% Percentile 1792

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.269 99% Percentile 1964

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2007

90% Percentile 1814 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 2007

95% Percentile 2218 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 2007

99% Percentile 3115 90% UPL 1959

90% Chebyshev UP L 2704

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1897 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2340

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1939

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2552

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2678

Washington UPL Results 151Components

Metals (mg/kg)

Total Metals (mg/kg)

Ions

Total Halogens (mg/kg)

* All 90% UPL Results reported as Normal MRL

= Method Reporting Limit

** 90% UPL Result reported as Lognormal MDL

= Method Detection Limit

*** 90% UPL Result Non

‐ Parametric HAP = Hazardous Air Pollutant

‐‐ = Non

‐ Detect OH = Organic Halogen

n.d.

= Only 1 Distinct Value, therefore no variance. N = Nitrogenated 7157 6702 6900 7172 5587 6617 0.09 0.11

0.99 0.55 0.57 1.5 0.58 18.47

0.53 0.74

11.9 13.5 10.3 23.1 19.5 15.87 19.63 14.88 30.34

62 73 17 61 0.8 0.4 2

0.4 0.4

0.08

80.4 18.4

143.5 Fluorine (mg/kg)

110.9 143.5 175.3 102.6 124 Chlorine (mg/kg) 99 130 165 79.5 85.5 137.5 260.5 370.5 143.5 33.0 Nickel (HAP)

Selenium (HAP) 0.8 Manganese (HAP)

Mercury (HAP) 0.08 0.08 0.08 Lead (HAP) 20 60 210 18

0.3 0.08 Cobalt (HAP) 100 80 26 Chromium (HAP) 60 6.3

0.39 Beryllium (HAP) 22 11 Heating Value (BTU/lb)

Antimony (HAP)

Cadmium (HAP)

8.2 0.2

13 0.4 0.4 Arsenic (HAP) 57 100 80 0.18 0.15 0.16 Nitrogen (wt%) 0.09 0.14 0.09 23

Sulfur (wt%) 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.16 Moisture (wt%)

Ash (wt%) 4/18 Comp. 4/19 Comp. 4/30 Comp. 5/1 Comp. 5/2 Comp. 5/3 Comp.

Mass. C&D Summary Table 1526251 7059 7243 7022 6872 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.76

55.5

72.3 0.96 0.67 22.7 14.5 13.94 28.3 20.82

0.89 1.06 0.67 0.52 0.71

53.7 60.6 104.1 0.68

466. 4 26 21

0.98

0.99

135.9 83.9 31.8 11.2 72.73 0.4 0.39

16 180 13 180

0.2 2 6035 6763 0.15 0.17 0.08

0.39 0.39

32

89.4 150

12.1 17.7 13.9 0.78

8.5 8.9

84.4 107.1 163.9 0.4

43 50 220

140.7 106. 4 462.5 0.78 0.18

2 6444 6568 0.16 0.18

37 47

184.6 105.6

15 15.75 19.6 15.1

0.6

349.5 4 180

154 155 86.9

20.3 29.6 18.7 0.98 71

31

388.2 0.08 0.08

29.3 12.5

83.0 73.1 2 5/16 Comp. 5/17 Comp.

130 0.18

80

174.3 174.5 460.0 23.5 0.79 0.98 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.1 0.08 47

0.08 19 9.5 240

0.08 0.08 0.78 0.79 0.39 0.39 44

0.2

0.4 0.4 0.4 210

0.2 92

59 130 7434

210 4 150 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.15

0.17 13.3 16.6 5/15 Comp.

0.16 0.11 5/4 Comp. 5/7 Comp. 5/8 Comp. 5/9 Comp. 5/10 Comp. 5/11 Comp. 5/14 Comp.

Mass. C&D Summary Table 1530.17

6481 6947 21.4 22 16.86

1.22 0.99 0.87 0.65 20.3

46.6 2

0.08 0.08 0.08

104.1 109.1

27 42 7.5

30 48 8.5

0.08 0.08 0.08 37 56 33 100

186.1 188.1 228.1

83 68

0.99 58

0.08

327.5 159.5 423.5

194.6 19.4 37.7

86.5 0.08 0.08

1

178.4 136

16.2

173.7 0.2

0.39 0.39 0.4

68 0.15 0.08 0.09

140 21 52 0.16 0.17

6676

17 6608

460.5 170 28

67.1 230

58.0 11.37 0.39

120 110 0.17 5/21 Comp. 5/22 Comp.

0.08 4/18 Re Comp. 4/19 Re Comp. 4/30 Re Comp. 5/1 Re Comp.

39.1 110 240 47 19 23

0.08 0.8 66 64 95 5/23 Comp. 5/2 Re Comp. 5/3 Re Comp. 5/18 Comp.

Mass. C&D Summary Table 15450 86 32 100 5/11 Re Comp. 5/14 Re Comp. 5/15 Re Comp.

0.08 0.08

103.7 12

0.08 0.08

201.1

89

159.9 81.1 20 47

6.6 8.8

103.1 111.1 16 17

114.1 87.1 266.1 86.1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 16 52

0.08 0.08 13 5 45 15 120 32 40 50

53 20 130 37 50 56 65 29 5/10 Re Comp. 5/16 Re Comp. 5/17 Re Comp. 5/4 Re Comp. 5/7 Re Comp. 5/8 Re Comp. 5/9 Re Comp.

Mass. C&D Summary Table 15516 14

0.39

0.35 0.08 0.08 0.76 0.9 1.09 9.12 31.9 18.87

0.66

7655 5468 6427 7713

26 6541 6935

0.07 2.2 18 56 82 52 46

0.07 0.39 34 54

37 62

0.08

33.9 13.3 28.9 14.9 28.9 14.9 23.2 14.1 33.9 13.3 240.5 49.5

23.2 14.1 372.7 52.1 303.7 308.5 0.4

18 10 19 200 9.6 0.4 0.4

99 150 120 16 54 140 110 0.19 0.14 0.17 0.19

150 0.39 0.2 0.08 0.21 0.09 0.09 0.09

170 18.6

0.18 0.17 11.4 5/10 Grab

15.7 5/8 Grab

0.56 0.6 4/30 Grab 5/2 Grab 5/4 Grab

0.08 0.08

89.1 172.1 20 9.7

178.1 107.8 0.08 0.08 76 5/21 Re Comp. 5/18 Re Comp. 5/22 Re Comp. 5/23 Re Comp. 4/18 Grab

Mass. C&D Summary Table 15618

0.08 0.08 0.08 6.1 0.94 0.18 0.76 0.49

6875 7159 7435 0.17 0.55 0.82

6918

0.08 280 2 5.4 22

21

48.5

33.8 31.8

33.8 31.8 150

314.5 8.0 322.1

19 0.49 170

0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09

0.4 15

0.4

16.6 17.2 16.6 17.2 142.5 125.2 0.41 0.4

34

90 120 2 2.7 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.14 14 12.78 4/30 Re Grab 5/16 Grab 5/14 Grab

12.7 17.5 4/18 Re Grab 5/18 Grab 5/22 Grab

31.5 12 9.7 9.7

0.08 35 2.5 2

0.58

242.6 97.6 442.1

30 52 220

0.08 0.08 177 43 220 5/10 Re Grab 5/2 Re Grab 5/4 Re Grab 5/8 Re Grab

Mass. C&D Summary Table 157*all results reported as moisture free

*all results pooled from all 7 samples

Non

‐

Detect Average Standard

Deviation Low High

31 18.20 5.34 9.12 31.9 25.31

31 0.76 0.23 0.49 1.5 1.062**

31 0.11 0.04 0.08 0.21 0.16***

31 0.17 0.01 0.14 0.19 0.18***

31 6788.8 0 520.79 5468.0 0 7713 7483

56 2.00 0.00 2.00 2 n.d.

1 63.72 59.28 0.94 220 187.8**

56 0.200 0.000 0.200 0.2 n.d.

31 0.40 0.01 0.39 0.41 0.4***

1 69.38 63.0 4 0.49 240 179***

56 0.79 0.01 0.78 0.8 0.8

1 43.75 62.33 2.0 280.0 129***

56 57.80 19.7 4 31.0 80 91.0

1 0.10 0.08 0.070 0.580 0.080

56 0.98 0.01 0.98 0.99 0.99

56 0.87 0.11 0.78 1 1.0

‐‐ 182.37 136.1 8.01 466 460.3**

41 104.32 41.37 47 178 160.6

31 20.21 8.12 10 38 31.48**

‐‐ 89.75 59.62 13.30 194.6 175.2*** 56.1 9.1 0.08 20 6.9 18 0.9 18 1.2

0.08

18.9 13.9 6.5 2.4 5.3

0.12 0.08 6.1

6.4 5.9 5/16 Re Grab 5/14 Re Grab 5/18 Re Grab 5/22 Re Grab Range

90% UPL

Results*

Mass. C&D Summary Table 158

### Moisture ( w Ash (wt%) Nitrogen ( w Sulfur (wt % Heating Va Antimony Arsenic (H A Beryllium ( Cadmium (

30 30 30 30 30 5 60 5 30

15.87 0.55 0.09 0.18 7157 57 0.4

19.63 0.57 0.14 0.17 6702 100 0.4

18.47 1.5 0.09 0.17 6900 80 0.4

14.88 0.58 0.09 0.18 7172 2 22 0.2 0.4

30.34 0.53 0.11 0.15 5587 11 0.4

23 0.74 0.16 0.16 6617 6.3 0.39

13.3 0.67 0.09 0.18 7434 44 0.39

16.6 0.76 0.09 0.18 7059 2 92 0.2 0.39

15.1 0.6 0.16 0.18 7243 210 0.4

15.75 0.89 0.09 0.18 7022 4 0.4

19.6 1.06 0.15 0.17 6872 150 0.4

22.7 0.67 0.08 0.16 6251 2 37 0.2 0.39

14.5 0.52 0.09 0.18 6444 47 0.39

13.94 0.71 0.12 0.18 6568 210 0.4

28.3 0.96 0.11 0.15 6035 13 0.4

20.82 0.68 0.08 0.17 6763 2 180 0.2 0.39

21.4 1.22 0.08 0.17 6608 110 0.39

20.3 0.99 0.15 0.17 6676 140 0.39

22 0.87 0.08 0.16 6481 21 0.39

16.86 0.65 0.09 0.17 6947 2 52 0.2 0.4

66

64

95

27

42

7.5

45

15

120

32

40

50

47

65

29

89

76

46

34

54

9.12 0.76 0.2 0.19 7655 170 0.4

31.9 0.9 0.08 0.14 5468 16 0.4

18.87 1.09 0.21 0.17 6427 54 0.39

11.4 0.56 0.09 0.19 7713 140 0.4

15.7 0.6 0.09 0.18 6541 110 0.39

Mass. ProUCL Entry 159

### 18.6 0.66 0.09 0.17 6935 14 0.39

14 0.55 0.09 0.18 7159 18 0.41

12.78 0.82 0.14 0.18 7435 2.7 0.4

12.7 0.76 0.09 0.18 6918 15 0.4

17.5 0.49 0.09 0.17 6875 0.94 0.4

150

22

177

43

220

9.7

18

1.2

5.9

6.1

Mass. ProUCL Entry 160

### Chromium Cobalt (H A Lead (HAP ) Manganes e Mercury ( H Nickel (HA Selenium ( Total Meta Chlorine ( m

60 5 60 5 60 5 5 60 20

60 20 0.08 137.48 99

100 60 0.08 260.48 130

80 210 0.08 370.48 165

26 0.8 17 73 0.3 0.99 0.8 143.49 79.5

13 61 0.08 85.48 124

8.2 18 0.08 32.97 62

59 71 0.08 174.47 53.7

130 0.79 130 31 0.08 0.98 0.79 388.23 60.6

240 9.5 0.08 459.98 154

4 15 0.1 23.5 155

180 19 0.08 349.48 86.9

43 0.78 8.5 47 0.07 0.98 0.78 140.7 72.3

50 8.9 0.07 106.36 89.4

220 32 0.08 462.48 150

16 26 0.08 55.48 104.1

180 0.78 21 80 0.08 0.98 0.99 466.42 72.73

120 230 0.08 460.47 46.6

170 17 0.08 327.47 178.4

28 110 0.08 159.47 67.1

68 0.8 240 58 0.08 0.99 1 423.47 136

83 37 0.08 186.08

68 56 0.08 188.08

100 33 0.08 228.08

30 47 0.08 104.08

48 19 0.08 109.08

8.5 23 0.08 39.08

53 16 0.08 114.08

20 52 0.08 87.08

130 16 0.08 266.08

37 17 0.08 86.08

50 13 0.08 103.08

56 5 0.08 111.08

50 6.6 0.08 103.68

86 8.8 0.08 159.88

32 20 0.08 81.08

100 12 0.08 201.08

82 20 0.08 178.08

52 9.7 0.08 107.78

37 18 0.08 89.08

62 56 0.08 172.08

200 2.2 0.08 372.68

9.6 26 0.07 52.07

99 150 0.35 303.74

150 18 0.08 308.48

120 10 0.08 240.47

Mass. ProUCL Entry 161

### 16 19 0.07 49.46

34 90 0.08 142.49

2 120 0.08 125.18

19 280 0.08 314.48

0.49 6.1 0.08 8.01

170 2 0.08 322.08

21 5.4 0.08 48.48

30 35 0.58 242.58

52 2.5 0.08 97.58

220 2 0.08 442.08

9.7 12 0.08 31.48

18 20 0.08 56.08

0.9 6.9 0.08 9.08

6.4 6.5 0.12 18.92

5.3 2.4 0.08 13.88

Mass. ProUCL Entry 162

### Fluorine ( m Total Halogens (mg/kg)

30 30

11.9 110.9

13.5 143.5

10.3 175.3

23.1 102.6

19.5 143.5

18.4 80.4

29.3 83

12.5 73.1

20.3 174.3

29.6 184.6

18.7 105.6

12.1 84.4

17.7 107.1

13.9 163.9

31.8 135.9

11.2 83.93

11.37 57.97

16.2 194.6

19.4 86.5

37.7 173.7

23.2 23.2

14.1 14.1

33.9 33.9

13.3 13.3

28.9 28.9

Mass. ProUCL Entry 163

### 14.9 14.9

16.6 16.6

17.2 17.2

33.8 33.8

31.8 31.8

Mass. ProUCL Entry 164Moisture

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 30

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 9.12 Minimum 2.21

Maximum 31.9 Maximum 3.463

Second Largest 30.34 Second Largest 3.412

First Quartile 14.6 First Quartile 2.681

Median 17.18 Median 2.844

Third Quartile 20.69 Third Quartile 3.03

Mean 18.2 Mean 2.862

SD 5.337 SD 0.283

Coefficient of Variation 0.293

Skewness 0.947

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.934 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.984

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 27.04 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 27.98

90% UPL (t) 25.31 90% UPL (t) 25.53

90% Percentile (z) 25.04 90% Percentile (z) 25.16

95% Percentile (z) 26.98 95% Percentile (z) 27.88

99% Percentile (z) 30.61 99% Percentile (z) 33.82

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 11.64 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 1.563

MLE of Mean 18.2

MLE of Standard Deviation 5.334

nu sta r 698.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.273 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.745 90% Percentile 23.53

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0839 95% Percentile 29.42

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 31.45

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 30.34

90% Percentile 25.28 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 30.34

95% Percentile 27.77 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 30.34

99% Percentile 32.84 90% UPL 27.77

90% Chebyshev UP L 34.47

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 25.37 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 29.83

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 25.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 27.51

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 27.61

Ash

Mass. UPL Results 165General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 25

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.49 Minimum

‐ 0.713

Maximum 1.5 Maximum 0.405

Second Largest 1.22 Second Largest 0.199

First Quartile 0.585 First Quartile

‐ 0.536

Median 0.695 Median

‐ 0.364

Third Quartile 0.885 Third Quartile

‐ 0.122

Mean 0.764 Mean

‐ 0.309

SD 0.234 SD 0.277

Coefficient of Variation 0.306

Skewness 1.384

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.883 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.95

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.151 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.162

90% UPL (t) 1.075 90% UPL (t) 1.062

90% Percentile (z) 1.063 90% Percentile (z) 1.047

95% Percentile (z) 1.148 95% Percentile (z) 1.158

99% Percentile (z) 1.307 99% Percentile (z) 1.398

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 11.62 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0657

MLE of Mean 0.764

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.224

nu sta r 697.3

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.603 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.745 90% Percentile 1.063

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.136 95% Percentile 1.162

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 1.419

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.22

90% Percentile 1.061 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.22

95% Percentile 1.166 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.22

99% Percentile 1.379 90% UPL 1.087

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.476

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.064 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1.335

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.064

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.154

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.156

Nitrogen

General Statistic s

Mass. UPL Results 166Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 9

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.08 Minimum

‐ 2.526

Maximum 0.21 Maximum

‐ 1.561

Second Largest 0.2 Second Largest

‐ 1.609

First Quartile 0.09 First Quartile

‐ 2.408

Median 0.09 Median

‐ 2.408

Third Quartile 0.135 Third Quartile

‐ 2.005

Mean 0.11 Mean

‐ 2.248

SD 0.0363 SD 0.287

Coefficient of Variation 0.329

Skewness 1.445

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.754 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.795

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.171 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.17

90% UPL (t) 0.159 90% UPL (t) 0.155

90% Percentile (z) 0.157 90% Percentile (z) 0.153

95% Percentile (z) 0.17 95% Percentile (z) 0.169

99% Percentile (z) 0.195 99% Percentile (z) 0.206

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 10.48 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0105

MLE of Mean 0.11

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0341

nu sta r 629

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.879 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.745 90% Percentile 0.16

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.35 95% Percentile 0.182

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 0.207

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2

90% Percentile 0.156 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2

95% Percentile 0.172 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.164

99% Percentile 0.205 90% UPL 0.16

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.221

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.156 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.203

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.156

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.17

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.17

Sulfu r

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Mass. UPL Results 167Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.14 Minimum

‐ 1.966

Maximum 0.19 Maximum

‐ 1.661

Second Largest 0.19 Second Largest

‐ 1.661

First Quartile 0.17 First Quartile

‐ 1.772

Median 0.17 Median

‐ 1.772

Third Quartile 0.18 Third Quartile

‐ 1.715

Mean 0.172 Mean

‐ 1.763

SD 0.0116 SD 0.0698

Coefficient of Variation 0.0672

Skewness

‐ 0.991

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.872 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.856

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.191 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.193

90% UPL (t) 0.187 90% UPL (t) 0.188

90% Percentile (z) 0.187 90% Percentile (z) 0.188

95% Percentile (z) 0.191 95% Percentile (z) 0.192

99% Percentile (z) 0.199 99% Percentile (z) 0.202

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 196.2 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 8.77E

‐ 04

MLE of Mean 0.172

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0123

nu sta r 11769

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.773 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.745 90% Percentile 0.18

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.24 95% Percentile 0.186

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 0.19

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.19

90% Percentile 0.188 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.19

95% Percentile 0.193 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.18

99% Percentile 0.202 90% UPL 0.18

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.207

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.188 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.195

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.188

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.192

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.192

Heating Value

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 30

Number of Missing Value s 20

Mass. UPL Results 168Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5468 Minimum 8.607

Maximum 7713 Maximum 8.951

Second Largest 7655 Second Largest 8.943

First Quartile 6548 First Quartile 8.787

Median 6874 Median 8.835

Third Quartile 7133 Third Quartile 8.872

Mean 6789 Mean 8.82

SD 520.8 SD 0.0792

Coefficient of Variation 0.0767

Skewness

‐ 0.656

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.957 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.936

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7652 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7718

90% UPL (t) 7483 90% UPL (t) 7523

90% Percentile (z) 7456 90% Percentile (z) 7492

95% Percentile (z) 7645 95% Percentile (z) 7711

99% Percentile (z) 8000 99% Percentile (z) 8138

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 151.9 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 44.68

MLE of Mean 6789

MLE of Standard Deviation 550.8

nu sta r 9116

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.481 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.745 90% Percentile 7434

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.115 95% Percentile 7556

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 7696

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7655

90% Percentile 7504 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 7655

95% Percentile 7719 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 7655

99% Percentile 8135 90% UPL 7435

90% Chebyshev UP L 8377

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 7508 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 8010

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 7511

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7694

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7699

Antimony

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 5 Number of Distinct Observation s 1

Number of Missing Value s 15

Mass. UPL Results 169Warning: There is only one distinct observation value in this data set

‐ resulting in '0' variance !

ProUCL (or any other software) should not be used on such a data set!

The data set for variable Antimony was not processed!

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible, compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) based sample size and analytical results

.

The Project Team may decide to use alternative site specific values to estimate environmental parameters (e.g., EPC, BTV)

.

Arsenic

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 60 Number of Distinct Observation s 51

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.94 Minimum

‐ 0.0619

Maximum 220 Maximum 5.394

Second Largest 210 Second Largest 5.347

First Quartile 17.5 First Quartile 2.861

Median 45.5 Median 3.818

Third Quartile 92.75 Third Quartile 4.53

Mean 63.72 Mean 3.593

SD 59.28 SD 1.257

Coefficient of Variation 0.93

Skewness 1.157

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.182 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.114

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 154.2 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 247.4

90% UPL (t) 141.2 90% UPL (t) 187.8

90% Percentile (z) 139.7 90% Percentile (z) 182

95% Percentile (z) 161.2 95% Percentile (z) 287.3

99% Percentile (z) 201.6 99% Percentile (z) 676.7

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.984 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 64.74

MLE of Mean 63.72

MLE of Standard Deviation 64.23

nu sta r 118.1

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.211 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.779 90% Percentile 152

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0569 95% Percentile 181.5

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.118 99% Percentile 214.1

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 177

90% Percentile 147.3 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 180

95% Percentile 192 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 177.3

99% Percentile 295.8 90% UPL 168

90% Chebyshev UP L 243

Mass. UPL Results 17090% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 146.9 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 205.6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 151.6

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 172

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 180.8

Beryllium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 5 Number of Distinct Observation s 1

Number of Missing Value s 15

Warning: There is only one distinct observation value in this data set

‐ resulting in '0' variance !

ProUCL (or any other software) should not be used on such a data set!

The data set for variable Beryllium was not processed!

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible, compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) based sample size and analytical results

.

The Project Team may decide to use alternative site specific values to estimate environmental parameters (e.g., EPC, BTV)

.

Cadmium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.39 Minimum

‐ 0.942

Maximum 0.41 Maximum

‐ 0.892

Second Largest 0.4 Second Largest

‐ 0.916

First Quartile 0.39 First Quartile

‐ 0.942

Median 0.4 Median

‐ 0.916

Third Quartile 0.4 Third Quartile

‐ 0.916

Mean 0.396 Mean

‐ 0.926

SD 0.00556 SD 0.014

Coefficient of Variation 0.014

Skewness 0.0735

Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.717 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.716

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

Mass. UPL Results 17190% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.406 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.406

90% UPL (t) 0.404 90% UPL (t) 0.404

90% Percentile (z) 0.403 90% Percentile (z) 0.403

95% Percentile (z) 0.405 95% Percentile (z) 0.406

99% Percentile (z) 0.409 99% Percentile (z) 0.409

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 4732 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 8.38E

‐ 05

MLE of Mean 0.396

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.00576

nu sta r 283931

A

‐ D Test Statistic 4.462 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.745 90% Percentile 0.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.35 95% Percentile 0.4

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 0.407

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.4

90% Percentile 0.404 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 0.406 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 0.41 90% UPL 0.4

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.413

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.404 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.415

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.404

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.406

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.406

Chromium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 60 Number of Distinct Observation s 46

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.49 Minimum

‐ 0.713

Maximum 240 Maximum 5.481

Second Largest 220 Second Largest 5.394

First Quartile 19.75 First Quartile 2.983

Median 51 Median 3.932

Third Quartile 100 Third Quartile 4.605

Mean 69.38 Mean 3.663

SD 63.04 SD 1.33

Coefficient of Variation 0.908

Skewness 1.12

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.163 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.129

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 165.6 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 296.5

90% UPL (t) 151.8 90% UPL (t) 221.5

90% Percentile (z) 150.2 90% Percentile (z) 214.2

Mass. UPL Results 17295% Percentile (z) 173.1 95% Percentile (z) 347.3

99% Percentile (z) 216 99% Percentile (z) 859.4

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.962 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 72.14

MLE of Mean 69.38

MLE of Standard Deviation 70.75

nu sta r 115.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.192 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.779 90% Percentile 171

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0659 95% Percentile 201

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.118 99% Percentile 228.2

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 180

90% Percentile 161.3 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 200

95% Percentile 210.7 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 182

99% Percentile 325.9 90% UPL 179

90% Chebyshev UP L 260.1

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 160.8 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 220.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 167.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 188.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 200

Cobalt

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 5 Number of Distinct Observation s 3

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.78 Minimum

‐ 0.248

Maximum 0.8 Maximum

‐ 0.223

Second Largest 0.8 Second Largest

‐ 0.223

First Quartile 0.78 First Quartile

‐ 0.248

Median 0.79 Median

‐ 0.236

Third Quartile 0.8 Third Quartile

‐ 0.223

Mean 0.79 Mean

‐ 0.236

SD 0.01 SD 0.0127

Coefficient of Variation 0.0127

Skewness 0

Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 5 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

Mass. UPL Results 173It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.821 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.821

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.817 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.818

90% UPL (t) 0.807 90% UPL (t) 0.807

90% Percentile (z) 0.803 90% Percentile (z) 0.803

95% Percentile (z) 0.806 95% Percentile (z) 0.807

99% Percentile (z) 0.813 99% Percentile (z) 0.814

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3120 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 2.53E

‐ 04

MLE of Mean 0.79

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0141

nu sta r 31204

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.631 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.678 90% Percentile 0.8

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.28 95% Percentile 0.8

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.357 99% Percentile 0.8

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.8

90% Percentile 0.808 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 0.813 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 0.823 90% UPL 0.8

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.823

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.807 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.83

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.807

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.818

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.818

Lead

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 60 Number of Distinct Observation s 46

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2 Minimum 0.693

Maximum 280 Maximum 5.635

Second Largest 240 Second Largest 5.481

First Quartile 9.65 First Quartile 2.267

Median 19 Median 2.944

Third Quartile 48.25 Third Quartile 3.875

Mean 43.75 Mean 3.046

SD 62.33 SD 1.215

Coefficient of Variation 1.425

Skewness 2.402

Mass. UPL Results 174Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.279 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.117

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 138.9 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 134.4

90% UPL (t) 125.2 90% UPL (t) 103

90% Percentile (z) 123.6 90% Percentile (z) 99.87

95% Percentile (z) 146.3 95% Percentile (z) 155.3

99% Percentile (z) 188.7 99% Percentile (z) 355.6

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.78 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 56.1

MLE of Mean 43.75

MLE of Standard Deviation 49.54

nu sta r 93.59

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.153 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.789 90% Percentile 121

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.195 95% Percentile 211

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.119 99% Percentile 256.4

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 150

90% Percentile 107 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 210

95% Percentile 143.2 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 210

99% Percentile 228.9 90% UPL 129

90% Chebyshev UP L 232.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 102.1 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 106.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 100.8

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 121.7

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 122

Manganese

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 5 Number of Distinct Observation s 5

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 31 Minimum 3.434

Maximum 80 Maximum 4.382

Second Largest 73 Second Largest 4.29

First Quartile 47 First Quartile 3.85

Median 58 Median 4.06

Third Quartile 73 Third Quartile 4.29

Mean 57.8 Mean 4.003

SD 19.74 SD 0.38

Coefficient of Variation 0.342

Skewness

‐ 0.328

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 5 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

Mass. UPL Results 175It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 5 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.968 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.94

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 111.9 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 155.2

90% UPL (t) 90.96 90% UPL (t) 103.7

90% Percentile (z) 83.1 90% Percentile (z) 89.12

95% Percentile (z) 90.27 95% Percentile (z) 102.3

99% Percentile (z) 103.7 99% Percentile (z) 132.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3.932 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 14.7

MLE of Mean 57.8

MLE of Standard Deviation 29.15

nu sta r 39.32

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.243 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.679 90% Percentile 77.2

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.204 95% Percentile 78.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.358 99% Percentile 79.72

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 80

90% Percentile 96.87 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 80

95% Percentile 112.6 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 80

99% Percentile 146.1 90% UPL 80

90% Chebyshev UP L 122.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 97.83 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 112

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 99.08

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 133

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 137.4

Mercury

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 60 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.07 Minimum

‐ 2.659

Maximum 0.58 Maximum

‐ 0.545

Second Largest 0.35 Second Largest

‐ 1.05

Mass. UPL Results 176First Quartile 0.08 First Quartile

‐ 2.526

Median 0.08 Median

‐ 2.526

Third Quartile 0.08 Third Quartile

‐ 2.526

Mean 0.0968 Mean

‐ 2.445

SD 0.0778 SD 0.362

Coefficient of Variation 0.803

Skewness 5.114

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.502 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.505

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.215 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.151

90% UPL (t) 0.198 90% UPL (t) 0.139

90% Percentile (z) 0.196 90% Percentile (z) 0.138

95% Percentile (z) 0.225 95% Percentile (z) 0.157

99% Percentile (z) 0.278 99% Percentile (z) 0.202

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 4.492 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0216

MLE of Mean 0.0968

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0457

nu sta r 539

A

‐ D Test Statistic 18.65 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.753 90% Percentile 0.08

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.514 95% Percentile 0.129

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.115 99% Percentile 0.444

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.1

90% Percentile 0.158 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.12

95% Percentile 0.182 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.08

99% Percentile 0.233 90% UPL 0.08

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.332

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.155 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.08

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.151

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.169

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.164

Nickel

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 5 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.98 Minimum

‐ 0.0202

Maximum 0.99 Maximum

‐ 0.0101

Second Largest 0.99 Second Largest

‐ 0.0101

First Quartile 0.98 First Quartile

‐ 0.0202

Mass. UPL Results 177Median 0.98 Median

‐ 0.0202

Third Quartile 0.99 Third Quartile

‐ 0.0101

Mean 0.984 Mean

‐ 0.0161

SD 0.00548 SD 0.00556

Coefficient of Variation 0.00557

Skewness 0.609

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 5 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.684 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.684

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.999 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.999

90% UPL (t) 0.993 90% UPL (t) 0.993

90% Percentile (z) 0.991 90% Percentile (z) 0.991

95% Percentile (z) 0.993 95% Percentile (z) 0.993

99% Percentile (z) 0.997 99% Percentile (z) 0.997

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 16159 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 6.09E

‐ 05

MLE of Mean 0.984

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.00774

nu sta r 161595

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.56 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.678 90% Percentile 0.99

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.486 95% Percentile 0.99

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.357 99% Percentile 0.99

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.99

90% Percentile 0.994 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 0.997 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 1.002 90% UPL 0.99

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.002

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.993 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1.005

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.993

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.999

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.999

Mass. UPL Results 178Selenium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 5 Number of Distinct Observation s 5

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.78 Minimum

‐ 0.248

Maximum 1 Maximum 0

Second Largest 0.99 Second Largest

‐ 0.0101

First Quartile 0.79 First Quartile

‐ 0.236

Median 0.8 Median

‐ 0.223

Third Quartile 0.99 Third Quartile

‐ 0.0101

Mean 0.872 Mean

‐ 0.143

SD 0.113 SD 0.127

Coefficient of Variation 0.129

Skewness 0.595

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 5 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 5 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.746 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.75

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.762

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.181 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.226

90% UPL (t) 1.061 90% UPL (t) 1.072

90% Percentile (z) 1.016 90% Percentile (z) 1.019

95% Percentile (z) 1.057 95% Percentile (z) 1.067

99% Percentile (z) 1.134 99% Percentile (z) 1.163

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 30.92 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0282

MLE of Mean 0.872

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.157

nu sta r 309.2

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.771 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.678 90% Percentile 0.996

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.36 95% Percentile 0.998

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.357 99% Percentile 1

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Mass. UPL Results 179Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1

90% Percentile 1.078 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1

95% Percentile 1.145 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1

99% Percentile 1.278 90% UPL 1

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.242

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.068 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1.29

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.069

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.209

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.213

Total Metals

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 60 Number of Distinct Observation s 60

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 8.01 Minimum 2.081

Maximum 466.4 Maximum 6.145

Second Largest 462.5 Second Largest 6.137

First Quartile 85.93 First Quartile 4.454

Median 141.6 Median 4.953

Third Quartile 275.5 Third Quartile 5.617

Mean 182.4 Mean 4.839

SD 136.1 SD 0.989

Coefficient of Variation 0.747

Skewness 0.739

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.146 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.113

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.114

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 390.1 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 571.8

90% UPL (t) 360.3 90% UPL (t) 460.3

90% Percentile (z) 356.9 90% Percentile (z) 449

95% Percentile (z) 406.3 95% Percentile (z) 643.2

99% Percentile (z) 499.1 99% Percentile (z) 1262

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.442 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 126.4

MLE of Mean 182.4

MLE of Standard Deviation 151.9

nu sta r 173.1

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.384 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.769 90% Percentile 391.8

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0782 95% Percentile 460

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.117 99% Percentile 464.1

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 442.1

90% Percentile 383.7 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 460

Mass. UPL Results 18095% Percentile 481.3 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 443.9

99% Percentile 702.5 90% UPL 419.9

90% Chebyshev UP L 594.2

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 385.4 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 559.8

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 396.1

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 441.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 460

Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 20 Number of Distinct Observation s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 46.6 Minimum 3.842

Maximum 178.4 Maximum 5.184

Second Largest 165 Second Largest 5.106

First Quartile 71 First Quartile 4.262

Median 94.2 Median 4.544

Third Quartile 139.5 Third Quartile 4.937

Mean 104.3 Mean 4.569

SD 41.37 SD 0.411

Coefficient of Variation 0.397

Skewness 0.341

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.929 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.948

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.905 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.905

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 177.3 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 199.4

90% UPL (t) 160.6 90% UPL (t) 168.8

90% Percentile (z) 157.3 90% Percentile (z) 163.4

95% Percentile (z) 172.4 95% Percentile (z) 189.8

99% Percentile (z) 200.6 99% Percentile (z) 251.2

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 5.61 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 18.59

MLE of Mean 104.3

MLE of Standard Deviation 44.04

nu sta r 224.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.434 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.744 90% Percentile 156

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.121 95% Percentile 165.7

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.194 99% Percentile 175.9

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 165

90% Percentile 163.2 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 166.3

95% Percentile 185.7 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 166.3

99% Percentile 232.9 90% UPL 164

90% Chebyshev UP L 231.5

Mass. UPL Results 18190% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 164.9 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 242.3

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 165.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 188.9

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 191.1

Fluoride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 29

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 10.3 Minimum 2.332

Maximum 37.7 Maximum 3.63

Second Largest 33.9 Second Largest 3.523

First Quartile 13.6 First Quartile 2.61

Median 18.05 Median 2.893

Third Quartile 27.48 Third Quartile 3.309

Mean 20.21 Mean 2.932

SD 8.118 SD 0.388

Coefficient of Variation 0.402

Skewness 0.722

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.89 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.935

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 33.66 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 35.69

90% UPL (t) 31.03 90% UPL (t) 31.48

90% Percentile (z) 30.61 90% Percentile (z) 30.85

95% Percentile (z) 33.56 95% Percentile (z) 35.53

99% Percentile (z) 39.09 99% Percentile (z) 46.29

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 6.226 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 3.246

MLE of Mean 20.21

MLE of Standard Deviation 8.098

nu sta r 373.5

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.789 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.746 90% Percentile 32

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.136 95% Percentile 33.86

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 36.6

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 33.9

90% Percentile 31.03 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 33.9

95% Percentile 35.1 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 33.81

99% Percentile 43.63 90% UPL 33.6

90% Chebyshev UP L 44.96

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 31.21 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 48.29

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 31.26

Mass. UPL Results 18290% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 34.72

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 34.93

Total Halogens

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 29

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 13.3 Minimum 2.588

Maximum 194.6 Maximum 5.271

Second Largest 184.6 Second Largest 5.218

First Quartile 32.3 First Quartile 3.475

Median 84.17 Median 4.433

Third Quartile 141.6 Third Quartile 4.953

Mean 89.75 Mean 4.189

SD 59.62 SD 0.889

Coefficient of Variation 0.664

Skewness 0.26

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.882

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 188.5 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 287.8

90% UPL (t) 169.2 90% UPL (t) 215.8

90% Percentile (z) 166.2 90% Percentile (z) 206.1

95% Percentile (z) 187.8 95% Percentile (z) 284.7

99% Percentile (z) 228.5 99% Percentile (z) 521.9

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.617 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 55.49

MLE of Mean 89.75

MLE of Standard Deviation 70.57

nu sta r 97.05

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.883 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.761 90% Percentile 174.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.144 95% Percentile 180.4

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.162 99% Percentile 191.7

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 184.6

90% Percentile 183.6 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 184.6

95% Percentile 228 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 184.6

99% Percentile 327.7 90% UPL 175.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 271.6

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 187.4 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 305.6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 192.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 226

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 236.2

Mass. UPL Results 183MDL 6/14/2002 7/2/2002 7/16/2002 8/20/2002 10/1/2002 10/25/2002 2/1/2003 2/11/2003 3/31/2003

Components

‐‐ 12.6 3.9 6.5 8.3 15.13 16.6 3.9 22.4 21.7

‐‐ 4.34782608 7 5.20291363 2 4.17112299 5 5.45256270 4 3.41699069 2 2.67386091 1 4.78668054 1 3.09278350 5 3.57598978 3

‐‐ 0.14874141 9 0.20811654 5 0.21390374 3 0.11995637 9 0.10604453 9 0.04796163 1 0.08324661 8 0.0644329 9 0.17879948 9

‐‐ 9330.66361 6 8455.77523 4 8308.0213 9 8095.96510 4 8707.434 9 8383.69304 6 8328.82414 2 9292.52577 3 9206.89655 2

Metals (mg/kg)

‐‐ 2.28832951 9 0.10405827 3 0.98395721 9 3.94765539 8 1.76740897 8 3.71702637 9 5.20291363 2 6.44329896 9 4.85312899 1

‐‐ 0.34324942 8 0.114464 1 0.17112299 5 0.1417666 3 0.35348179 6 0.03597122 3 0.02081165 5 0.18041237 1 0.21711366 5

‐‐ 2.86041189 9 2.18522372 5 2.78074866 3 12.5408942 2 10.0153175 4 2.87769784 2 13.9438085 3 13.6597938 1 4.98084291 2

‐‐ 10.6407322 7 5.9313215 4 22.9946524 1 5.99781897 5 6.48049958 8 0.83932853 7 23.3090530 7 5.92783505 2 9.4508301 4

‐‐

Total Metals (mg/kg)

‐‐ 16.1 8.3 26.9 22.6 18.6 7.5 42.5 26.2 19.5

Ions

‐‐ 800.0 1700. 0 1400. 0 1100. 0 1000. 0 400.0 1300. 0 830.0 1000. 0

‐‐

Total Halogens (mg/kg)

‐‐ 800.0 1700. 0 1400. 0 1100. 0 1000. 0 400.0 1300. 0 830.0 1000. 0

* All 90% UPL Results reported as Normal MRL

= Method Reporting Limit

** 90% UPL Result reported as Lognormal MDL

= Method Detection Limit

*** 90% UPL Result Non

‐ Parametric HAP = Hazardous Air Pollutant

‐‐ = Non

‐ Detect OH = Organic Halogen

n.d.

= Only 1 Distinct Value, therefore no variance. N = Nitrogenated Lead (HAP) Chromium (HAP) Cadmium (HAP)

Fluorine (mg/kg) Chlorine (mg/kg) Mercury (HAP) Moisture (wt%)

Arsenic (HAP) Heating Value (BTU/lb) Sulfur (wt%) Ash (wt%)

NY C&D Summary Table 1844/15/2003 5/13/2003 6/29/2003 7/15/2003 8/31/2003 9/12/2003 9/16/2003 9/24/2003 10/29/2003 11/21/2003 11/28/2003 12/5/2003 12/11/2003 12/22/ 2003

12.4 22.5 13.86 6.55 8.6 11.1 13 12.3 13.3 16.9 16.9 18.4 21.8 22.5

4.56621004 6 5.93548387 1 4.5275133 5 4.17335473 5 3.93873085 3 13.2733408 3 9.60919540 2 4.56100342 1 9.45790080 7 3.61010830 3 7.3405535 5 3.0637254 9 3.51662404 1 10.451612 9

0.15981735 2 0.19354838 7 0.02321801 7 0.06420545 7 0.13129102 8 0.11494252 9 0.04561003 4 0.03460207 6 0.04813477 7 0.09626955 5 0.04901960 8 0.07672634 3 0.18064516 1

9028.53881 3 8335.48387 1 9283.7241 7 8240.77046 5 8718.81838 1 7599.55005 6 7780.4597 7 8746.8643 1 8238.75432 5 8389.89169 7 8932.61131 2 9291.66666 7 8207.16112 5 8477.41935 5

2.16894977 2 1.61290322 6 0.65645514 2 18.2227221 6 37.4712643 7 6.15735461 8 82.1222606 7 2.40673886 9 12.3947051 7 12.7450980 4 4.85933503 8 6.96774193 5

0.05707762 6 0.09032258 1 0.01044810 8 0.32102728 7 0.09846827 1 0.89988751 4 0.09195402 3 0.0798175 6 0.26528258 4 0.04813477 7 0.04813477 7 0.52696078 4 0.12787723 8 0.18064516 1

5.47945205 5 4.11612903 2 7.77803575 6 21.0807918 7 3.93873085 3 41.7322834 6 0.57471264 4 7.75370581 5 76.9319492 5 2.76774969 9 6.61853188 9 16.0539215 7 5.11508951 4 11.4838709 7

2.9680365 3 7.87096774 2 3.83097283 5 2.14018191 5 5.68927789 9 19.9100112 5 5.97701149 4 4.10490307 9 21.2226066 9 3.12876052 9 22.3826714 8 5.63725490 2 0.51150895 1 19.2258064 5

10.7 13.7 11.6 23.5 10.4 80.8 44.1 18.1 180.5 8.4 41.4 35.0 10.6 37.9

1400. 0 1500. 0 1300. 0 600.0 700.0 1100. 0 1300. 0 1100. 0 600.0 1000. 0 700.0 500.0

1400. 0 1500. 0 1300. 0 600.0 700.0 1100. 0 1300. 0 1100. 0 600.0 1000. 0 700.0 500.0

NY C&D Summary Table 18512/26/2003 1/2/2004 1/23/2004 1/30/2004 2/6/2004 2/13/2004 3/8/2004 3/19/2004 3/26/2004 4/2/2004 4/23/2004 4/30/2004 5/7/2004 5/14/2004

22.2 5.5 17.9 16.6 19.2 15.1 14.3 10.7 19.2 15.4 19.8 15.4 12.2 15.9

5.91259640 1 9.31216931 2 4.26309378 8 2.99760191 8 3.46534653 5 6.36042402 8 7.58459743 3 9.07054871 2 6.55940594 1 7.44680851 1 4.61346633 4 2.83687943 3 6.37813211 8 3.21046373 4

0.11568123 4 0.10582010 6 0.09744214 4 0.13189448 4 0.12376237 6 0.17667844 5 0.23337222 9 0.23516237 4 0.19801980 2 0.14184397 2 0.12468827 9 0.08274231 7 0.14806378 1 0.11890606 4

8962.72493 6 8271.95767 2 10669.9147 4 11699.0407 7 9297.02970 3 8935.21790 3 7987.16452 7 7573.34826 4 9017.32673 3 8034.2789 6 8284.28927 7 8427.89598 1 8690.20501 1 8694.41141 5

3.08483290 5 4.97354497 4 27.7710109 6 2.39808153 5 13.7376237 6 0.1177856 3 4.43407234 5 1.23180291 2 4.70297029 7 26.832151 3 18.8279301 7 2.83687943 3 3.75854214 1 4.04280618 3

0.2827763 5 0.12698412 7 0.14616321 6 0.09592326 1 0.06188118 8 0.2355712 6 0.05834305 7 1.11982E

‐ 0 6 0.0495049 5 1.77304964 5 0.04987531 2 0.16548463 4 0.14806378 1 0.34482758 6

7.19794344 5 10.0529100 5 44.9451887 9 11.9904076 7 12.995049 5 10.8362779 7 12.2520420 1 12.8779395 3 9.03465346 5 37.3522458 6 20.6982543 6 5.31914893 6 8.5421412 3 7.37217598 1

7.32647814 9 33.2275132 3 6.57734470 2 16.3069544 4 6.55940594 1 14.0164899 9 12.4854142 4 12.8779395 3 13.3663366 3 31.3238770 7 5.23690773 1 5.08274231 7 19.3621867 9 6.42092746 7

17.9 48.4 79.4 30.8 33.4 25.2 29.2 27.0 27.2 97.3 44.8 13.4 31.8 18.2

1800. 0 2100. 0 800.0 600.0 800.0 1100. 0 1600. 0 1700. 0 1200. 0 1100. 0 1100. 0 800.0 900.0 900.0

1800. 0 2100. 0 800.0 600.0 800.0 1100. 0 1600. 0 1700. 0 1100. 0 1100. 0 800.0 900.0 900.0

NY C&D Summary Table 1866/11/2004 6/19/2004 7/2/2004 7/16/2004 8/6/2004 8/15/2004 9/10/2004 9/17/2004 9/25/2004 10/8/2004 10/16/3453 10/29/2004 11/5/2004 11/12/2004

14.8 13.8 13.9 17 16.6 14.5 15.3 16 15 10.7 10.2 11 15.7 15.6

2.81690140 8 2.90023201 9 2.55516840 9 2.16867469 9 2.63788968 8 9.94152046 8 2.60920897 3 2.14285714 3 2.11764705 9 1.90369540 9 1.78173719 4 2.80898876 4 10.640569 4 14.6919431 3

0.08215962 4 0.02320185 6 0.10452961 7 0.08433734 9 0.03597122 3 0.12865497 1 0.07083825 3 0.0595238 1 0.05882352 9 0.05599104 1 0.0445434 3 0.0224719 1 0.0948991 7 0.13033175 4

8816.90140 8 8800.46403 7 8577.23577 2 8530.12048 2 9224.22062 4 7857.30994 2 9213.69539 6 8267.85714 3 9077.64705 9 9359.46248 6 9230.51224 9 9165.16853 9 8465.00593 1 8581.75355 5

0.11737089 2 2.78422273 8 8.94308943 1 12.2891566 3 29.1366906 5 19.7660818 7 4.60448642 3 9.28571428 6 4 15.677491 6 10.9131403 1 4.60674157 3 2.38434163 7 2.72511848 3

0.1408450 7 0.3596287 7 0.30197444 8 0.19277108 4 0.2038369 3 0.80701754 4 1.07438016 5 0.0595238 1 0.10588235 3 0.13437849 9 0.17817371 9 0.07865168 5 0.40332147 1 0.24881516 6

4.22535211 3 19.3735498 8 12.7758420 4 17.2289156 6 42.9256594 7 28.6549707 6 8.85478158 2 14.1666666 7 11.1764705 9 17.4692049 3 22.0489977 7 18.8764044 9 70.2253855 3 127.01421 8

9.15492957 7 81.6705336 4 7.31707317 1 7.95180722 9 8.87290167 9 44.3274853 8 5.43093270 4 3.8095238 1 10 176.931690 9 15.1447661 5 3.48314606 7 15.1838671 4 39.2180094 8

13.6 104.2 29.3 37.7 81.1 93.6 20.0 27.3 25.3 210.2 48.3 27.0 88.2 169.2

600.0 700.0 700.0 700.0 700.0 700.0 1100. 0 1100. 0 1100. 0 1700. 0 700.0 700.0 794.0 856.0

600.0 700.0 700.0 700.0 700.0 700.0 1100. 0 1100. 0 1100. 0 1700. 0 700.0 700.0 794.0 856.0

NY C&D Summary Table 18711/19/2004 2/11/2005 2/18/2005 2/25/2005 5/6/2005 5/21/2005 5/27/2005 6/19/2005 9/9/2005 9/23/2005 1/29/2006 2/11/2006 2/17/2006 2/24/2006

16.4 23.7 18.2 9.1 22.6 11.5 13 15.9 13.9 15.8 12.5 24.3 33 21.2

3.34928229 7 2.62123197 9 2.81173594 1 8.0308030 8 6.07235142 1 2.03389830 5 2.29885057 5 1.66468489 9 7.20092915 2 4.8693586 7 3.12 10.3302509 9 20 6.47208121 8

0.10765550 2 0.13106159 9 0.09779951 1 0.15401540 2 0.1937984 5 0.0903954 8 0.05747126 4 0.04756242 6 0.03484320 6 0.05938242 3 0.02285714 3 0.02642007 9 0.02985074 6 0.02538071 1

9232.05741 6 9251.6382 7 9172.37163 8 7388.33883 4 8727.39018 1 8700.56497 2 9174.71264 4 9199.76218 8 7620.20905 9 8072.44655 6 8352 7552.17965 7 6662.68656 7 8220.81218 3

32.4162679 4 0.65530799 5 0.85574572 1 3.74037403 7 2.84237726 1 1.35593220 3 0.68965517 2 5.46967895 4 3.94889663 2 29.5724465 6 17.3714285 7 18.0977542 9 7.61194029 9 3.80710659 9

0.82535885 2 0.0131061 6 0.09779951 1 0.23102310 2 0.10335917 3 0.01129943 5 0.06896551 7 0.01189060 6 0.08130081 3 0.10688836 1 0.33142857 1 0.06605019 8 0.20895522 4 0.02538071 1

58.7320574 2 4.9803407 6 4.8899755 5 13.0913091 3 11.2403100 8 6.32768361 6 7.12643678 2 10.2259215 2 16.3763066 2 42.7553444 2 49.6 44.6499339 5 31.6417910 4 23.7309644 7

3.46889952 2 1.3106159 9 4.64547677 3 17.1617161 7 10.8527131 8 1.24293785 3 2.98850574 7 1.07015457 8 11.9628339 1 14.6080760 1 2.85714285 7 18.0977542 9 12.388059 7 4.82233502 5

95.4 7.0 10.5 34.2 25.0 8.9 10.9 16.8 32.4 87.0 70.2 80.9 51.9 32.4

900.0 1600. 0 1000. 0 1500. 0 1900. 0 1600. 0 800.0 600.0 900.0 1600. 0 1500. 0 1500. 0 900.0 900.0

900.0 1600. 0 1000. 0 1500. 0 1900. 0 1600. 0 800.0 600.0 900.0 1600. 0 1500. 0 1500. 0 900.0 900.0

NY C&D Summary Table 1883/3/2006 3/13/2006 3/24/2006 3/31/2006 5/17/2006 6/17/2006 6/24/2006 11/28/2006 10/30/2006 12/23/2006 11/28/2006 10/30/2006 12/23/2006 5/2/2 007

24.3 29.1 25.7 21.5 4 11.3 10.8 13.3 30 24.3 27.9 26.3 4 21.52 22.91 20.3 4

4.22721268 2 10.8603667 1 8.74831763 1 5.901096 1 9.2446448 7 5.82959641 3 3.92156862 7 6.17142857 1 9.6433289 3 5.13176144 2 13.3043714 4 4.68909276 2 13.5296406 8 3.28897815 7

0.02642007 9 0.02820874 5 0.04037685 1 0.03823604 4 0.03382187 1 0.04484304 9 0.02306805 1 0.07142857 1 0.26420079 3 0.04160887 7 0.05430355 7 0.050968 4 0.03891555 3 0.03766005 5

8441.21532 4 7296.19181 9 7858.68102 3 8130.25745 6 7597.51972 9 8041.47982 1 8126.87427 9 8040 8025.09907 5 7593.61997 2 7097.47488 5 8019.87767 6 7745.49228 2 8306.5528 5

22.0607661 8 4.01974612 1 4.71063257 1 2.80397654 9 14.6561443 1 15.8071748 9 11.6493656 3 7.5 6.86922060 8 12.2052704 6 10.7249524 8 2.5356778 8 3.98235828 3 3.80366557 9

0.48877146 6 0.11283497 9 0.34993270 5 0.52255926 6 0.22547914 3 0.6726457 4 0.08073817 8 0.07142857 1 0.07926023 8 0.09708737 9 0.06787944 6 0.08919469 9 0.28538072 4

56.4068692 2 72.0733427 4 126.648721 4 29.186846 8 34.3855693 3 32.8475336 3 24.7981545 6 29.7142857 1 16.3804491 4 59.5006934 8 68.5582405 6 21.5086646 3 35.5428719 7 8.08435852 4

4.22721268 2 3.22385653 8 26.917900 4 14.5296966 6 21.6459977 5 132.847533 6 7.84313725 5 16.8571428 6 24.5706737 1 10.540915 4 36.1118653 3 23.9933741 1 31.3270203 7 13.7333668 1

0.00700 0

83.2 79.4 158.6 47.0 70.9 182.2 44.4 54.1 47.9 82.3 115.5 48.1 71.1 25.6

800.0 1000. 0 600.0 6460. 0 900.0 800.0 600.0 900.0 900.0 800.0 900.0 700.0 737.0 600.0

155.714285 7 658.807212 2 418.13738 8 212.793068 3 406.018938 9 37.6600552 3

800.0 1000. 0 600.0 6460. 0 900.0 800.0 600.0 1055.7 900.0 1458. 8 1318.1 912.8 1143. 0 637.7 

# New York C&D SUMMARY

NY C&D Summary Table 1895/3/2007 5/11/2007 10/21/2007 11/17/2007 11/29/2007 12/28/2007 1/4/2008 1/13/2008 1/26/2008 2/15/2008 2/29/2008 3/14/2008 5/16/2008 6/7/2008

21.93 19.16 11.3 15.9 16.6 14.8 28.8 30.8 32.7 38 29.1 23.6 20.9 21.9

8.99193031 9 2.68431469 6 9.13190529 9 12.96076 1 6.95443645 1 7.51173708 9 16.9943820 2 7.22543352 6 14.4873699 9 6.29032258 1 6.06488011 3 8.37696335 1 9.10240202 3 8.70678617 2

0.0512360 7 0.03711034 1 0.157835 4 0.03567181 9 0.21582733 8 0.05868544 6 0.22471910 1 0.14450867 1 0.04457652 3 0.03225806 5 0.04231311 7 0.07853403 1 0.0252844 5 0.03841229 2

7735.36569 7 8313.95348 8 7942.50281 8 7626.63495 8 8173.86091 1 8071.59624 4 7008.42696 6 8109.8265 9 7292.71916 8 8151.61290 3 7902.67983 1 7727.74869 1 8040.4551 2 8088.34827 1

18.5346483 9 13.3349826 8 52.6493799 3 21.7598097 5 3.71702637 9 2.11267605 6 20.9269662 9 5.05780346 8 10.5497771 2 55.1612903 2 6.06488011 3 7.1989528 8 42.0986093 6 3.96927016 6

34.9045728 2 19.5695200 4 98.3089064 3 74.3162901 3 15.5875299 8 24.7652582 2 48.0337078 7 26.1560693 6 24.2199108 5 64.6774193 5 9.87306064 9 20.0261780 1 9.10240202 3 25.6081946 2

37.8250288 2 16.575952 5 27.2829763 2 36.7419738 4 12.8297362 1 62.4413145 5 39.0449438 2 28.0346820 8 77.8603268 9 43.2258064 5 34.6967559 9 35.6020942 4 7.07964601 8 86.683738 8

0.03500 0 0.01600 0 0.05100 0 0.04900 0 0.03500 0 0.09600 0 0.08000 0 0.06000 0 0.01000 0 0.00800 0 0.01000 0 0.10000 0 0.13000 0 0.14000 0

91.3 49.5 178.3 132.9 32.2 89.4 108.1 59.3 112.6 163.1 50.6 62.9 58.4 116. 4

1900. 0 900.0 653.0 640.0 895.0 1000. 0 970.0 900.0 1115. 0 800.0 800.0 900.0 1200. 0 1400. 0

256.18035 1 123.701138 1

2156.2 1023.7 653.0 640.0 895.0 1000. 0 970.0 900.0 1115. 0 800.0 800.0 900.0 1200. 0 1400. 0

NY C&D Summary Table 1909/26/2008 11/23/2008 12/19/2008 1/11/2009 2/1/2009 2/13/2009 3/13/2009 3/20/2009 4/25/2009 5/1/2009 8/18/2009 8/30/2009 11/13/2009 11/20/200 9

30.8 15.5 18.16 16.1 24.2 29.2 32.7 30.3 21.6 25.29 14.18 19.3 15.33 16.18

9.17630057 8 5.72781065 1 3.10361681 3 8.05721096 5 7.51978891 8 3.53107344 6 9.95542347 7 3.29985652 8 4.65561224 5 6.96024628 6 2.85481239 8 2.68897149 9 4.80689736 6 4.53352421 9

0.18786127 2 0.07100591 7 0.09775171 1 0.1072705 6 0.10554089 7 0.05649717 5 0.1485884 1 0.08608321 4 0.11479591 8 0.17400615 7 0.06991377 3 0.07434944 2 0.03543167 6 0.03579098 1

7955.20231 2 8285.20710 1 8583.82209 2 7938.02145 4 8307.38786 3 8435.02824 9 7989.59881 1 8358.68005 7 8321.42857 1 8064.51612 9 8606.38545 8 8731.1028 5 8505.96433 2 8569.55380 6

51.0115606 9 4.11834319 5 3.16471163 2 110.059594 8 15.9630606 9 42.9420505 2 16.9296987 1 18.112244 9 10.9757729 9 1.24679561 9 2.0941759 6 1.93693161 7 1.56287282 3

64.4508670 5 6.34319526 6 7.22140762 5 110.97735 4 10.8179419 5 60.7726597 3 31.5638450 5 44.1326530 6 29.5810467 1 0.6991377 3 4.70879801 7 1.44088815 4 1.56287282 3

82.5144508 7 26.3786982 2 13.3675464 3 14.9702026 2 8.31134564 6 70.4309063 9 14.6341463 4 63.5204081 6 98.781956 9 2.91307387 6 2.72614622 1 0.64958072 5 0.97828680 5

0.05200 0 0.04800 0 0.02800 0 0.07700 0 0.00900 0 0.01300 0 0.02600 0 0.07600 0 0.30700 0 0.02600 0 0.01200 0 0.08000 0 0.05300 0

198.0 36.9 23.8 236.1 35.1 174.2 63.2 125.8 139.6 4.9 9.5 4.1 4.2

820.0 760.0 675.0 9940. 0 640.0 2200. 0 1300. 0 1800. 0 1300. 0 1500. 0 900.0 980.0 1000. 0 1000. 0

820.0 760.0 675.0 9940. 0 640.0 2200. 0 1300. 0 1800. 0 1300. 0 1500. 0 900.0 980.0 1000. 0 1000. 0

NY C&D Summary Table 19112/12/2009 12/18/2009 2/15/2010 3/14/2010 3/21/2010 3/29/2010 4/26/2010 4/30/2010 8/15/2010 8/17/2010 8/27/2010 10/12/2010 10/22/2010 10/27/ 2010

15.8 18 20.2 23.8 22.4 23.2 20.2 23.93 13.8 17.16 21.88 16.4 20.03 22.37

3.49168646 1 3.53658536 6 5.26315789 5 5.11811023 6 3.60824742 3 2.47395833 3 4.26065162 9 4.20665176 8 3.48027842 2 4.7320135 2 4.83870967 7 6.72248803 8 8.07802926 1 7.17506118 8

0.03562945 4 0.10975609 8 0.28822055 1 0.05249343 8 0.03865979 4 0.06510416 7 0.06265664 2 0.14460365 5 0.04640371 2 0.06035731 5 0.03840245 8 0.17942583 7 0.20007502 8 0.14169779 7

8578.38479 8 8363.41463 4 8746.86716 8 8625.98425 2 8487.11340 2 8196.61458 3 8397.24310 8 6969.89614 8 8561.48491 9 8611.78174 8 8475.42242 7 8234.44976 1 8623.23371 3 8478.68092 2

15.9144893 1 30.2439024 4 27.5689223 1 10.7611548 6 10.6958762 9 5.33854166 7 2.88220551 4 7.09872485 9 8.81670533 6 5.35972959 9 12.4167946 7 14.1985645 9 11.9294735 5 8.82390828 3

12.8266033 3 29.8780487 8 23.5588972 4 13.1233595 8 12.8865979 4 7.55208333 3 4.76190476 2 11.1739187 6 12.645011 6 7.43602124 6 18.6891961 1 18.3971291 9 16.7437789 2 13.718923 1

23.6342042 8 27.3170731 7 18.2957393 5 38.5826771 7 14.0463917 5 23.828125 18.4210526 3 35.6250821 6 15.1972157 8 18.5055528 7 92.6779313 9 50.8971291 9 115.030636 5 139.173000 1

0.10000 0 0.26000 0 0.00500 0 0.00500 0 0.00500 0 0.00500 0 0.07600 0 0.22000 0 0.17000 0 0.13500 0 0.16000 0 0.13000 0 0.21200 0 0.12700 0

52.5 87.7 69.4 62.5 37.6 36.7 26.1 54.1 36.8 31.4 123.9 83.6 143.9 161.8

2000. 0 2100. 0 1300. 0 600.0 500.0 900.0 700.0 2200. 0 300.0 857.0 820.0 692.0 645.0 569.0

2000. 0 2100. 0 1300. 0 600.0 500.0 900.0 700.0 2200. 0 300.0 857.0 820.0 692.0 645.0 569.0

NY C&D Summary Table 19212/31/2010 1/31/2011 2/20/2011 4/13/2011 4/8/2011 4/22/2011 5/21/2011 5/27/2011 6/4/2011 8/12/2011 9/30/2011 10/21/2011 11/15/2011 1/29/2012

26.6 30.23 33.39 28.4 31.18 28.81 21.6 4 29.22 38.5 32.27 28.12 21.8 28.93 18.27

7.82016348 8 5.14547799 9 11.5748386 1 6.07541899 4 8.66027317 6 4.67762326 2 3.17764165 4 5.49590279 7 3.82113821 1 6.0239185 16.1658319 4 10.268542 2 15.4636274 1 4.64945552 4

0.19073569 5 0.21499211 7 0.16514036 9 0.08379888 3 0.08718395 8 0.0421407 5 0.06380806 5 0.12715456 3 0.14634146 3 0.13288055 5 0.08347245 4 0.05115089 5 0.12663571 1 0.15906032 1

8782.01634 9 9217.42869 4 8455.18690 9 8593.57541 9 8204.01046 2 8502.5986 8 8786.37059 7 8506.64029 4 8497.56097 6 8290.2701 9 7591.81969 9 8135.54987 2 8262.27662 9 8557.44524 7

3.51498637 6 1.66260570 4 4.02341990 7 25.8938547 5 26.3004940 4 1.2361286 7 0.28075548 7 6.35772817 2 13.3983739 8 12.1068950 2 23.1218697 8 17.0332480 8 2.7297031 1 13.8382478 9

8.14713896 5 2.50824136 4 7.23615072 8 36.2290502 8 40.3952339 4 5.18331226 3 0.20418580 9 15.2868041 8 27.4146341 5 17.1711206 3 9.5993322 2 20.9718670 1 5.89559589 1 17.4476936 3

34.6049046 3 10.6922746 2 12.7007956 8 22.5 261.406567 9 21.9974715 5 0.38284839 2 26.999152 3 135.577235 8 41.5030267 2 20.6733444 6 14.3478260 9 21.7954129 7 43.6559402 9

0.02600 0 0.03600 0 0.04500 0 0.14600 0 0.22900 0 0.12800 0 0.07600 0 0.15400 0 0.15600 0 0.08900 0 0.06200 0 0.09700 0 0.14600 0 0.07900 0

46.3 14.9 24.0 84.8 328.3 28.5 0.9 48.8 176.5 70.9 53.5 52.4 30.6 75.0

586.0 374.0 500.0 584.0 482.0 656.0 460.0 500.0 1870. 0 514.0 310.0 341.0 145.0 400.0

586.0 374.0 500.0 584.0 482.0 656.0 460.0 500.0 1870. 0 514.0 310.0 341.0 145.0 400.0

NY C&D Summary Table 193*all results reported as moisture free

*all results pooled from all 7 samples

2/9/2012 3/2/2012 4/21/2012 4/27/2012 5/4/2012 Non

‐

Detect Average Standard

Deviation Low High

27.2 20.16 38.5 23.35 34.01 0 19.68 7.29 3.90 38.5 31.26**

1.37362637 4 2.83066132 3 11.9024390 2 1.60469667 3 7.44052129 1 0 6.11 3.57 1.37 20 10.84**

0.15109890 1 0.17535070 1 0.09756097 6 0.03913894 3 0.10607667 8 1 0.10 0.06 0.02 0.288 0.191***

8336.53846 2 8772.5450 9 8211.38211 4 8468.36268 8 8140.62736 8 0 8408.87 632.47 6662.69 11699.04 1 9213***

2.67857142 9 14.9549098 2 7.15447154 5 6.48401826 5 23.306561 6 3 11.9 4 15.18 0.10 110.06 31.64**

62 0.23 0.28 0.00 1.77 0.523***

3.62637362 6 28.5445891 8 46.5040650 4 12.0026092 6 40.4455220 5 1 23.47 24.05 0.20 127.01 58.44**

4.16208791 2 21.5430861 7 18.3739837 4 22.3091976 5 22.4731019 9 1 26.23 36.09 0.4 261. 4 63.52***

0.05400 0 0.06300 0 0.30000 0 0.07000 0 0.16100 0 79 0.09 0.07 0.005 0.31 0.204***

10.5 65.1 72.3 40.9 86.4

‐‐ 61.63 54.8 0.94 328 145**

508.0 460.0 400.0 1100. 0 4290. 0 2 1097.3 0 1029.3 8 145 9940 1710***

132 283.63 200.73 38 659 584.9*

508.0 460.0 400.0 1100. 0 4290. 0

‐‐ 1113.12 1033.6 0 145.0 0 9940. 0 1720*** Range

90% UPL

Results*

NY C&D Summary Table 194Moisture (wt%) Ash (wt%) Sulfur (wt%) Heating Value (BTU/lb) Arsenic (HAP) Cadmium (HAP)



### 140 140 139 140 137 78

12.6 4.34782608 7 0.14874141 9 9330.66361 6 2.28832951 9 0.34324942 8

3.9 5.20291363 2 0.20811654 5 8455.77523 4 0.10405827 3 0.1144641

6.5 4.17112299 5 0.21390374 3 8308.0213 9 0.98395721 9 0.17112299 5

8.3 5.45256270 4 0.11995637 9 8095.96510 4 3.94765539 8 0.14176663

15.13 3.41699069 2 0.10604453 9 8707.4349 1.76740897 8 0.35348179 6

16.6 2.67386091 1 0.04796163 1 8383.69304 6 3.71702637 9 0.03597122 3

3.9 4.78668054 1 0.08324661 8 8328.82414 2 5.20291363 2 0.02081165 5

22.4 3.09278350 5 0.0644329 9 9292.52577 3 6.44329896 9 0.18041237 1

21.7 3.57598978 3 0.17879948 9 9206.89655 2 4.85312899 1 0.21711366 5

12.4 4.56621004 6 0.15981735 2 9028.53881 3 2.16894977 2 0.05707762 6

22.5 5.93548387 1 0.19354838 7 8335.48387 1 1.61290322 6 0.09032258 1

13.86 4.52751335 0.02321801 7 9283.7241 7 0.01044810 8

6.55 4.17335473 5 0.06420545 7 8240.77046 5 0.32102728 7

8.6 3.93873085 3 0.13129102 8 8718.81838 1 0.65645514 2 0.09846827 1

11.1 13.2733408 3 7599.55005 6 18.2227221 6 0.89988751 4

13 9.60919540 2 0.11494252 9 7780.4597 7 37.4712643 7 0.09195402 3

12.3 4.56100342 1 0.04561003 4 8746.8643 1 6.15735461 8 0.0798175 6

13.3 9.45790080 7 0.03460207 6 8238.75432 5 82.1222606 7 0.26528258 4

16.9 3.61010830 3 0.04813477 7 8389.89169 7 2.40673886 9 0.04813477 7

16.9 7.34055355 0.09626955 5 8932.61131 2 12.3947051 7 0.04813477 7

18.4 3.0637254 9 0.04901960 8 9291.66666 7 12.7450980 4 0.52696078 4

21.8 3.51662404 1 0.07672634 3 8207.16112 5 4.85933503 8 0.12787723 8

22.5 10.451612 9 0.18064516 1 8477.41935 5 6.96774193 5 0.18064516 1

22.2 5.91259640 1 0.11568123 4 8962.72493 6 3.08483290 5 0.28277635

5.5 9.31216931 2 0.10582010 6 8271.95767 2 4.97354497 4 0.12698412 7

17.9 4.26309378 8 0.09744214 4 10669.9147 4 27.7710109 6 0.14616321 6

16.6 2.99760191 8 0.13189448 4 11699.0407 7 2.39808153 5 0.09592326 1

19.2 3.46534653 5 0.12376237 6 9297.02970 3 13.7376237 6 0.06188118 8

15.1 6.36042402 8 0.17667844 5 8935.21790 3 0.11778563 0.2355712 6

14.3 7.58459743 3 0.23337222 9 7987.16452 7 4.43407234 5 0.05834305 7

10.7 9.07054871 2 0.23516237 4 7573.34826 4 1.23180291 2 1.11982E

‐ 0 6

19.2 6.55940594 1 0.19801980 2 9017.32673 3 4.70297029 7 0.04950495

15.4 7.44680851 1 0.14184397 2 8034.2789 6 26.8321513 1.77304964 5

19.8 4.61346633 4 0.12468827 9 8284.28927 7 18.8279301 7 0.04987531 2

15.4 2.83687943 3 0.08274231 7 8427.89598 1 2.83687943 3 0.16548463 4

12.2 6.37813211 8 0.14806378 1 8690.20501 1 3.75854214 1 0.14806378 1

15.9 3.21046373 4 0.11890606 4 8694.41141 5 4.04280618 3 0.34482758 6

14.8 2.81690140 8 0.08215962 4 8816.90140 8 0.11737089 2 0.1408450 7

13.8 2.90023201 9 0.02320185 6 8800.46403 7 2.78422273 8 0.3596287 7

13.9 2.55516840 9 0.10452961 7 8577.23577 2 8.94308943 1 0.30197444 8

17 2.16867469 9 0.08433734 9 8530.12048 2 12.2891566 3 0.19277108 4

16.6 2.63788968 8 0.03597122 3 9224.22062 4 29.1366906 5 0.20383693

14.5 9.94152046 8 0.12865497 1 7857.30994 2 19.7660818 7 0.80701754 4

15.3 2.60920897 3 0.07083825 3 9213.69539 6 4.60448642 3 1.07438016 5

16 2.14285714 3 0.0595238 1 8267.85714 3 9.28571428 6 0.0595238 1

15 2.11764705 9 0.05882352 9 9077.64705 9 4 0.10588235 3

10.7 1.90369540 9 0.05599104 1 9359.46248 6 15.677491 6 0.13437849 9

10.2 1.78173719 4 0.04454343 9230.51224 9 10.9131403 1 0.17817371 9

11 2.80898876 4 0.0224719 1 9165.16853 9 4.60674157 3 0.07865168 5

15.7 10.640569 4 0.0948991 7 8465.00593 1 2.38434163 7 0.40332147 1

15.6 14.6919431 3 0.13033175 4 8581.75355 5 2.72511848 3 0.24881516 6

16.4 3.34928229 7 0.10765550 2 9232.05741 6 32.4162679 4 0.82535885 2

23.7 2.62123197 9 0.13106159 9 9251.6382 7 0.65530799 5 0.0131061 6

18.2 2.81173594 1 0.09779951 1 9172.37163 8 0.85574572 1 0.09779951 1

9.1 8.0308030 8 0.15401540 2 7388.33883 4 3.74037403 7 0.23102310 2

22.6 6.07235142 1 0.19379845 8727.39018 1 2.84237726 1 0.10335917 3

11.5 2.03389830 5 0.0903954 8 8700.56497 2 1.35593220 3 0.01129943 5

13 2.29885057 5 0.05747126 4 9174.71264 4 0.68965517 2 0.06896551 7

15.9 1.66468489 9 0.04756242 6 9199.76218 8 5.46967895 4 0.01189060 6

NY ProUCL Entry 19513.9 7.20092915 2 0.03484320 6 7620.20905 9 3.94889663 2 0.08130081 3

15.8 4.8693586 7 0.05938242 3 8072.44655 6 29.5724465 6 0.10688836 1

12.5 3.12 0.02285714 3 8352 17.3714285 7 0.33142857 1

24.3 10.3302509 9 0.02642007 9 7552.17965 7 18.0977542 9 0.06605019 8

33 20 0.02985074 6 6662.68656 7 7.61194029 9 0.20895522 4

21.2 6.47208121 8 0.02538071 1 8220.81218 3 3.80710659 9 0.02538071 1

24.3 4.22721268 2 0.02642007 9 8441.21532 4 22.0607661 8 0.48877146 6

29.1 10.8603667 1 0.02820874 5 7296.19181 9 4.01974612 1 0.11283497 9

25.7 8.74831763 1 0.04037685 1 7858.68102 3 4.71063257 1 0.34993270 5

21.54 5.9010961 0.03823604 4 8130.25745 6 2.80397654 9 0.52255926 6

11.3 9.2446448 7 0.03382187 1 7597.51972 9 14.6561443 1 0.22547914 3

10.8 5.82959641 3 0.04484304 9 8041.47982 1 15.8071748 9 0.6726457 4

13.3 3.92156862 7 0.02306805 1 8126.87427 9 11.6493656 3 0.08073817 8

30 6.17142857 1 0.07142857 1 8040 7.5 0.07142857 1

24.3 9.64332893 0.26420079 3 8025.09907 5 6.86922060 8 0.07926023 8

27.9 5.13176144 2 0.04160887 7 7593.61997 2 12.2052704 6 0.09708737 9

26.34 13.3043714 4 0.05430355 7 7097.47488 5 10.7249524 8 0.06787944 6

21.52 4.68909276 2 0.050968 4 8019.87767 6 2.5356778 8 0.08919469 9

22.91 13.5296406 8 0.03891555 3 7745.49228 2 3.98235828 3 0.28538072 4

20.34 3.28897815 7 0.03766005 5 8306.55285 3.80366557 9

21.93 8.99193031 9 0.0512360 7 7735.36569 7 18.5346483 9

19.16 2.68431469 6 0.03711034 1 8313.95348 8 13.3349826 8

11.3 9.13190529 9 0.157835 4 7942.50281 8 52.6493799 3

15.9 12.960761 0.03567181 9 7626.63495 8 21.7598097 5

16.6 6.95443645 1 0.21582733 8 8173.86091 1 3.71702637 9

14.8 7.51173708 9 0.05868544 6 8071.59624 4 2.11267605 6

28.8 16.9943820 2 0.22471910 1 7008.42696 6 20.9269662 9

30.8 7.22543352 6 0.14450867 1 8109.8265 9 5.05780346 8

32.7 14.4873699 9 0.04457652 3 7292.71916 8 10.5497771 2

38 6.29032258 1 0.03225806 5 8151.61290 3 55.1612903 2

29.1 6.06488011 3 0.04231311 7 7902.67983 1 6.06488011 3

23.6 8.37696335 1 0.07853403 1 7727.74869 1 7.1989528 8

NY ProUCL Entry 19620.9 9.10240202 3 0.02528445 8040.4551 2 42.0986093 6

21.9 8.70678617 2 0.03841229 2 8088.34827 1 3.96927016 6

30.8 9.17630057 8 0.18786127 2 7955.20231 2 51.0115606 9

15.5 5.72781065 1 0.07100591 7 8285.20710 1 4.11834319 5

18.16 3.10361681 3 0.09775171 1 8583.82209 2 3.16471163 2

16.1 8.05721096 5 0.1072705 6 7938.02145 4 110.059594 8

24.2 7.51978891 8 0.10554089 7 8307.38786 3 15.9630606 9

29.2 3.53107344 6 0.05649717 5 8435.02824 9

32.7 9.95542347 7 0.1485884 1 7989.59881 1 42.9420505 2

30.3 3.29985652 8 0.08608321 4 8358.68005 7 16.9296987 1

21.6 4.65561224 5 0.11479591 8 8321.42857 1 18.112244 9

25.29 6.96024628 6 0.17400615 7 8064.51612 9 10.9757729 9

14.18 2.85481239 8 0.06991377 3 8606.38545 8 1.24679561 9

19.3 2.68897149 9 0.07434944 2 8731.10285 2.0941759 6

15.33 4.80689736 6 0.03543167 6 8505.96433 2 1.93693161 7

16.18 4.53352421 9 0.03579098 1 8569.55380 6 1.56287282 3

15.8 3.49168646 1 0.03562945 4 8578.38479 8 15.9144893 1

18 3.53658536 6 0.10975609 8 8363.41463 4 30.2439024 4

20.2 5.26315789 5 0.28822055 1 8746.86716 8 27.5689223 1

23.8 5.11811023 6 0.05249343 8 8625.98425 2 10.7611548 6

22.4 3.60824742 3 0.03865979 4 8487.11340 2 10.6958762 9

23.2 2.47395833 3 0.06510416 7 8196.61458 3 5.33854166 7

20.2 4.26065162 9 0.06265664 2 8397.24310 8 2.88220551 4

23.93 4.20665176 8 0.14460365 5 6969.89614 8 7.09872485 9

13.8 3.48027842 2 0.04640371 2 8561.48491 9 8.81670533 6

17.16 4.7320135 2 0.06035731 5 8611.78174 8 5.35972959 9

21.88 4.83870967 7 0.03840245 8 8475.42242 7 12.4167946 7

16.4 6.72248803 8 0.17942583 7 8234.44976 1 14.1985645 9

20.03 8.07802926 1 0.20007502 8 8623.23371 3 11.9294735 5

22.37 7.17506118 8 0.14169779 7 8478.68092 2 8.82390828 3

26.6 7.82016348 8 0.19073569 5 8782.01634 9 3.51498637 6

30.23 5.14547799 9 0.21499211 7 9217.42869 4 1.66260570 4

33.39 11.5748386 1 0.16514036 9 8455.18690 9 4.02341990 7

28.4 6.07541899 4 0.08379888 3 8593.57541 9 25.8938547 5

31.18 8.66027317 6 0.08718395 8 8204.01046 2 26.3004940 4

28.81 4.67762326 2 0.04214075 8502.5986 8 1.2361286 7

21.64 3.17764165 4 0.06380806 5 8786.37059 7 0.28075548 7

29.22 5.49590279 7 0.12715456 3 8506.64029 4 6.35772817 2

38.5 3.82113821 1 0.14634146 3 8497.56097 6 13.3983739 8

32.27 6.0239185 0.13288055 5 8290.2701 9 12.1068950 2

28.12 16.1658319 4 0.08347245 4 7591.81969 9 23.1218697 8

21.8 10.268542 2 0.05115089 5 8135.54987 2 17.0332480 8

28.93 15.4636274 1 0.12663571 1 8262.27662 9 2.7297031 1

18.27 4.64945552 4 0.15906032 1 8557.44524 7 13.8382478 9

27.2 1.37362637 4 0.15109890 1 8336.53846 2 2.67857142 9

20.16 2.83066132 3 0.17535070 1 8772.5450 9 14.9549098 2

38.5 11.9024390 2 0.09756097 6 8211.38211 4 7.15447154 5

23.35 1.60469667 3 0.03913894 3 8468.36268 8 6.48401826 5

34.01 7.44052129 1 0.10607667 8 8140.62736 8 23.306561 6

NY ProUCL Entry 197Chromium (HAP) Lead (HAP) Mercury (HA P Total Metals (mg/kg) Chlorine (mg/kg) Fluorine (mg/kg) Total Halogens (mg/kg)



### 139 139 61 139 138 8 137

2.86041189 9 10.6407322 7 16.1327231 1 800 800

2.18522372 5 5.9313215 4 8.33506763 8 1700 1700

2.78074866 3 22.9946524 1 26.9304812 8 1400 1400

12.5408942 2 5.99781897 5 22.6281352 2 1100 1100

10.0153175 4 6.48049958 8 18.6167079 1 1000 1000

2.87769784 2 0.83932853 7 7.47002398 1 400 400

13.9438085 3 23.3090530 7 42.4765868 9 1300 1300

13.6597938 1 5.92783505 2 26.2113402 1 830 830

4.98084291 2 9.4508301 4 19.5019157 1 1000 1000

5.47945205 5 2.96803653 10.6735159 8 1400 1400

4.11612903 2 7.87096774 2 13.6903225 8 1500 1500

7.77803575 6 3.83097283 5 11.619456 7 1300 1300

21.0807918 7 2.14018191 5 23.5420010 7 600 600

3.93873085 3 5.68927789 9 10.3829321 7 700 700

41.7322834 6 19.9100112 5 80.7649043 9

0.57471264 4 5.97701149 4 44.1149425 3 1100 1100

7.75370581 5 4.10490307 9 18.0957810 7 1300 1300

76.9319492 5 21.2226066 9 180.542099 2 1100 1100

2.76774969 9 3.12876052 9 8.35138387 5 600 600

6.61853188 9 22.3826714 8 41.4440433 2 1000 1000

16.0539215 7 5.63725490 2 34.9632352 9 700 700

5.11508951 4 0.51150895 1 10.6138107 4 500 500

11.4838709 7 19.2258064 5 37.8580645 2

7.19794344 5 7.32647814 9 17.8920308 5 1800 1800

10.0529100 5 33.2275132 3 48.3809523 8 2100 2100

44.9451887 9 6.57734470 2 79.4397076 7 800 800

11.9904076 7 16.3069544 4 30.7913669 1 600 600

12.9950495 6.55940594 1 33.353960 4 800 800

10.8362779 7 14.0164899 9 25.2061248 5 1100 1100

12.2520420 1 12.4854142 4 29.2298716 5 1600 1600

12.8779395 3 12.8779395 3 26.9876830 9 1700 1700

9.03465346 5 13.3663366 3 27.1534653 5 1200

37.3522458 6 31.3238770 7 97.2813238 8 1100 1100

20.6982543 6 5.23690773 1 44.8129675 8 1100 1100

5.31914893 6 5.08274231 7 13.4042553 2 800 800

8.54214123 19.3621867 9 31.8109339 4 900 900

7.37217598 1 6.42092746 7 18.1807372 2 900 900

4.22535211 3 9.15492957 7 13.6384976 5 600 600

19.3735498 8 81.6705336 4 104.187935 700 700

12.7758420 4 7.31707317 1 29.3379790 9 700 700

17.2289156 6 7.95180722 9 37.662650 6 700 700

42.9256594 7 8.87290167 9 81.1390887 3 700 700

28.6549707 6 44.3274853 8 93.5555555 6 700 700

8.85478158 2 5.43093270 4 19.9645808 7 1100 1100

14.1666666 7 3.8095238 1 27.3214285 7 1100 1100

11.1764705 9 10 25.2823529 4 1100 1100

17.4692049 3 176.931690 9 210.21276 6 1700 1700

22.0489977 7 15.1447661 5 48.2850779 5 700 700

18.8764044 9 3.48314606 7 27.0449438 2 700 700

70.2253855 3 15.1838671 4 88.1969157 8 794 794

127.01421 8 39.2180094 8 169.206161 1 856 856

58.7320574 2 3.46889952 2 95.4425837 3 900 900

4.9803407 6 1.3106159 9 6.95937090 4 1600 1600

4.88997555 4.64547677 3 10.4889975 6 1000 1000

13.0913091 3 17.1617161 7 34.2244224 4 1500 1500

11.2403100 8 10.8527131 8 25.0387596 9 1900 1900

6.32768361 6 1.24293785 3 8.93785310 7 1600 1600

7.12643678 2 2.98850574 7 10.8735632 2 800 800

10.2259215 2 1.07015457 8 16.7776456 6 600 600

NY ProUCL Entry 19816.3763066 2 11.9628339 1 32.3693379 8 900 900

42.7553444 2 14.6080760 1 87.0427553 4 1600 1600

49.6 2.85714285 7 70.16 1500 1500

44.6499339 5 18.0977542 9 80.9114927 3 1500 1500

31.6417910 4 12.388059 7 51.8507462 7 900 900

23.7309644 7 4.82233502 5 32.385786 8 900 900

56.4068692 2 4.22721268 2 83.1836195 5 800 800

72.0733427 4 3.22385653 8 79.4297803 7 1000 1000

126.648721 4 26.917900 4 158.627187 1 600 600

29.186846 8 14.5296966 6 47.0430792 8 6460 6460

34.3855693 3 21.6459977 5 70.9131905 3 900 900

32.8475336 3 132.847533 6 182.174887 9 800 800

24.7981545 6 7.84313725 5 44.3713956 2 600 600

29.7142857 1 16.8571428 6 54.1428571 4 900 155.714285 7 1055.71428 6

16.3804491 4 24.5706737 1 47.899603 7 900 900

59.5006934 8 10.540915 4 82.3439667 1 800 658.807212 2 1458.80721 2

68.5582405 6 36.1118653 3 115.462937 8 900 418.13738 8 1318.13738 8

21.5086646 3 23.9933741 1 48.1269113 1 700 212.793068 3 912.793068 3

35.5428719 7 31.3270203 7 71.1376313 4 737 406.018938 9 1143.01893 9

8.08435852 4 13.7333668 1 0.007 25.6283909 1 600 37.6600552 3 637.660055 2

34.9045728 2 37.8250288 2 0.035 91.2992500 3 1900 256.18035 1 2156.18035 1

19.5695200 4 16.5759525 0.016 49.4964552 2 900 123.701138 1 1023.70113 8

98.3089064 3 27.2829763 2 0.051 178.292262 7 653 653

74.3162901 3 36.7419738 4 0.049 132.867073 7 640 640

15.5875299 8 12.8297362 1 0.035 32.1692925 7 895 895

24.7652582 2 62.4413145 5 0.096 89.4152488 3 1000 1000

48.0337078 7 39.0449438 2 0.08 108.08561 8 970 970

26.1560693 6 28.0346820 8 0.06 59.3085549 1 900 900

24.2199108 5 77.8603268 9 0.01 112.640014 9 1115 1115

64.6774193 5 43.2258064 5 0.008 163.072516 1 800 800

9.87306064 9 34.6967559 9 0.01 50.6446967 6 800 800

20.0261780 1 35.6020942 4 0.1 62.9272251 3 900 900

NY ProUCL Entry 1999.10240202 3 7.07964601 8 0.13 58.410657 4 1200 1200

25.6081946 2 86.683738 8 0.14 116.401203 6 1400 1400

64.4508670 5 82.5144508 7 0.052 198.028878 6 820 820

6.34319526 6 26.3786982 2 0.048 36.8882366 9 760 760

7.22140762 5 13.3675464 3 0.028 23.7816656 9 675 675

110.97735 4 14.9702026 2 0.077 236.084151 4 9940 9940

10.8179419 5 8.31134564 6 0.009 35.1013482 8 640 640

2200 2200

60.7726597 3 70.4309063 9 0.013 174.158616 6 1300 1300

31.5638450 5 14.6341463 4 0.026 63.153690 1 1800 1800

44.1326530 6 63.5204081 6 0.076 125.841306 1 1300 1300

29.5810467 1 98.781956 9 0.307 139.645776 6 1500 1500

0.69913773 2.91307387 6 0.026 4.88500722 4 900 900

4.70879801 7 2.72614622 1 0.012 9.54112019 8 980 980

1.44088815 4 0.64958072 5 0.08 4.10740049 6 1000 1000

1.56287282 3 0.97828680 5 0.053 4.15703245 1000 1000

12.8266033 3 23.6342042 8 0.1 52.4752969 1 2000 2000

29.8780487 8 27.3170731 7 0.26 87.6990243 9 2100 2100

23.5588972 4 18.2957393 5 0.005 69.428558 9 1300 1300

13.1233595 8 38.5826771 7 0.005 62.472191 6 600 600

12.8865979 4 14.0463917 5 0.005 37.6338659 8 500 500

7.55208333 3 23.828125 0.005 36.72375 900 900

4.76190476 2 18.4210526 3 0.076 26.1411629 1 700 700

11.1739187 6 35.6250821 6 0.22 54.1177257 8 2200 2200

12.645011 6 15.1972157 8 0.17 36.8289327 1 300 300

7.43602124 6 18.5055528 7 0.135 31.4363037 2 857 857

18.6891961 1 92.6779313 9 0.16 123.943922 2 820 820

18.3971291 9 50.8971291 9 0.13 83.6228229 7 692 692

16.7437789 2 115.030636 5 0.212 143.91588 9 645 645

13.718923 1 139.173000 1 0.127 161.842831 5 569 569

8.14713896 5 34.6049046 3 0.026 46.2930299 7 586 586

2.50824136 4 10.6922746 2 0.036 14.8991216 9 374 374

7.23615072 8 12.7007956 8 0.045 24.0053663 1 500 500

36.2290502 8 22.5 0.146 84.7689050 3 584 584

40.3952339 4 261.406567 9 0.229 328.331295 8 482 482

5.18331226 3 21.9974715 5 0.128 28.5449124 9 656 656

0.20418580 9 0.38284839 2 0.076 0.94378968 9 460 460

15.2868041 8 26.9991523 0.154 48.7976846 6 500 500

27.4146341 5 135.577235 8 0.156 176.546243 9 1870 1870

17.1711206 3 41.5030267 2 0.089 70.8700423 7 514 514

9.5993322 2 20.6733444 6 0.062 53.4565464 7 310 310

20.9718670 1 14.3478260 9 0.097 52.4499411 8 341 341

5.89559589 1 21.7954129 7 0.146 30.5667119 7 145 145

17.4476936 3 43.6559402 9 0.079 75.0208818 1 400 400

3.62637362 6 4.16208791 2 0.054 10.5210329 7 508 508

28.5445891 8 21.5430861 7 0.063 65.1055851 7 460 460

46.5040650 4 18.3739837 4 0.3 72.3325203 3 400 400

12.0026092 6 22.3091976 5 0.07 40.8658251 8 1100 1100

40.4455220 5 22.4731019 9 0.161 86.3861856 3 4290 4290

NY ProUCL Entry 200General Background Statistics for Full Data Set s

User Selected Option s

From File WorkSheet.wst

Full Precision OFF

Confidence Coefficient 90%

Coverage 90%

Different or Future K Values 1

Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000

Moisture

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 140 Number of Distinct Observation s 112

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.9 Minimum 1.361

Maximum 38.5 Maximum 3.651

Second Largest 38.5 Second Largest 3.651

First Quartile 14.8 First Quartile 2.695

Median 18.78 Median 2.933

Third Quartile 23.83 Third Quartile 3.171

Mean 19.68 Mean 2.902

SD 7.292 SD 0.418

Coefficient of Variation 0.371

Skewness 0.376

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0934 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0693

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0749 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0749

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 30.15 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 33.19

90% UPL (t) 29.1 90% UPL (t) 31.26

90% Percentile (z) 29.02 90% Percentile (z) 31.12

95% Percentile (z) 31.67 95% Percentile (z) 36.22

99% Percentile (z) 36.64 99% Percentile (z) 48.15

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 6.492 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 3.031

MLE of Mean 19.68

MLE of Standard Deviation 7.724

nu sta r 1818

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.546 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.754 90% Percentile 30.02

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0558 95% Percentile 32.7

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0792 99% Percentile 38.31

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 30.8

90% Percentile 30 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 30.84

95% Percentile 33.86 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 30.84

99% Percentile 41.93 90% UPL 30.21

90% Chebyshev UP L 41.63

NY UPL Results 20190% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 30.02 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 37.38

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 30.26

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 31.5

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 31.83

Ash

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 140 Number of Distinct Observation s 140

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.374 Minimum 0.317

Maximum 20 Maximum 2.996

Second Largest 16.99 Second Largest 2.833

First Quartile 3.4 First Quartile 1.224

Median 5.125 Median 1.634

Third Quartile 8.037 Third Quartile 2.084

Mean 6.11 Mean 1.652

SD 3.572 SD 0.565

Coefficient of Variation 0.585

Skewness 1.271

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.129 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0643

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0749 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0749

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 11.24 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 11.75

90% UPL (t) 10.73 90% UPL (t) 10.84

90% Percentile (z) 10.69 90% Percentile (z) 10.77

95% Percentile (z) 11.98 95% Percentile (z) 13.23

99% Percentile (z) 14.42 99% Percentile (z) 19.44

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 3.266 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 1.871

MLE of Mean 6.11

MLE of Standard Deviation 3.381

nu sta r 914.5

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.882 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.758 90% Percentile 10.47

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0772 95% Percentile 13.32

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0796 99% Percentile 16.67

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 11.9

90% Percentile 10.64 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 12.01

95% Percentile 12.52 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 12.01

99% Percentile 16.56 90% UPL 10.62

90% Chebyshev UP L 16.86

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 10.62 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 14.99

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 10.65

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 11.34

NY UPL Results 20290% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 11.41

Sulfu r

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 139 Number of Distinct Observation s 138

Number of Missing Value s 1

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.0225 Minimum

‐ 3.795

Maximum 0.288 Maximum

‐ 1.244

Second Largest 0.264 Second Largest

‐ 1.331

First Quartile 0.0452 First Quartile

‐ 3.096

Median 0.0835 Median

‐ 2.483

Third Quartile 0.137 Third Quartile

‐ 1.986

Mean 0.0975 Mean

‐ 2.532

SD 0.0608 SD 0.661

Coefficient of Variation 0.623

Skewness 0.814

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.127 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.078

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.185 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.205

90% UPL (t) 0.176 90% UPL (t) 0.187

90% Percentile (z) 0.175 90% Percentile (z) 0.185

95% Percentile (z) 0.197 95% Percentile (z) 0.236

99% Percentile (z) 0.239 99% Percentile (z) 0.37

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.551 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0382

MLE of Mean 0.0975

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.061

nu sta r 709.3

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.356 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.762 90% Percentile 0.188

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0809 95% Percentile 0.214

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0801 99% Percentile 0.253

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.198

90% Percentile 0.179 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.198

95% Percentile 0.215 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.198

99% Percentile 0.292 90% UPL 0.191

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.28

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.179 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.275

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.18

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.193

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.195

NY UPL Results 203Heating Value

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 140 Number of Distinct Observation s 140

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6663 Minimum 8.804

Maximum 11699 Maximum 9.367

Second Largest 10670 Second Largest 9.275

First Quartile 8072 First Quartile 8.996

Median 8374 Median 9.033

Third Quartile 8710 Third Quartile 9.072

Mean 8409 Mean 9.034

SD 632.5 SD 0.0737

Coefficient of Variation 0.0752

Skewness 1.004

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0871 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0794

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0749 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0749

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9317 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9322

90% UPL (t) 9226 90% UPL (t) 9224

90% Percentile (z) 9219 90% Percentile (z) 9216

95% Percentile (z) 9449 95% Percentile (z) 9466

99% Percentile (z) 9880 99% Percentile (z) 9954

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 179.8 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 46.77

MLE of Mean 8409

MLE of Standard Deviation 627.1

nu sta r 50341

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.423 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.75 90% Percentile 9208

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0773 95% Percentile 9284

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0789 99% Percentile 10159

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9231

90% Percentile 9222 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 9231

95% Percentile 9466 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 9231

99% Percentile 9936 90% UPL 9213

90% Chebyshev UP L 10313

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 9223 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 9667

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 9223

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9319

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9319

Arsenic

NY UPL Results 204General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 137 Number of Distinct Observation s 136

Number of Missing Value s 3

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.104 Minimum

‐ 2.263

Maximum 110.1 Maximum 4.701

Second Largest 82.12 Second Largest 4.408

First Quartile 3.085 First Quartile 1.126

Median 6.443 Median 1.863

Third Quartile 15.68 Third Quartile 2.752

Mean 11.94 Mean 1.849

SD 15.18 SD 1.242

Coefficient of Variation 1.271

Skewness 3.345

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.218 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0672

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0757 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0757

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 33.78 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 37.9

90% UPL (t) 31.57 90% UPL (t) 31.64

90% Percentile (z) 31.4 90% Percentile (z) 31.21

95% Percentile (z) 36.92 95% Percentile (z) 49

99% Percentile (z) 47.26 99% Percentile (z) 114.2

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.908 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 13.15

MLE of Mean 11.94

MLE of Standard Deviation 12.53

nu sta r 248.8

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.107 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.787 90% Percentile 27.13

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0915 95% Percentile 38.4

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0825 99% Percentile 72.42

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 29.57

90% Percentile 28.16 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 29.84

95% Percentile 37.02 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 29.57

99% Percentile 57.75 90% UPL 27.61

90% Chebyshev UP L 57.66

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 27.11 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 34.57

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 27.34

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 30.27

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 30.87

Cadmium

General Statistic s

NY UPL Results 205Total Number of Observations 78 Number of Distinct Observation s 77

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.12E

‐ 06 Minimum

‐ 13.7

Maximum 1.773 Maximum 0.573

Second Largest 1.074 Second Largest 0.0717

First Quartile 0.0732 First Quartile

‐ 2.615

Median 0.131 Median

‐ 2.032

Third Quartile 0.278 Third Quartile

‐ 1.279

Mean 0.225 Mean

‐ 2.143

SD 0.277 SD 1.688

Coefficient of Variation 1.229

Skewness 3.162

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.208 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.196

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.1 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.1

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.639 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.459

90% UPL (t) 0.586 90% UPL (t) 1.054

90% Percentile (z) 0.58 90% Percentile (z) 1.02

95% Percentile (z) 0.681 95% Percentile (z) 1.884

99% Percentile (z) 0.87 99% Percentile (z) 5.953

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.87 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.259

MLE of Mean 0.225

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.242

nu sta r 135.7

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.123 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.786 90% Percentile 0.499

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.114 95% Percentile 0.81

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.105 99% Percentile 1.235

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.673

90% Percentile 0.537 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.673

95% Percentile 0.709 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.673

99% Percentile 1.114 90% UPL 0.523

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.062

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.51 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.586

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.523

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.587

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.611

Chromium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 139 Number of Distinct Observation s 139

Number of Missing Value s 1

NY UPL Results 206Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.204 Minimum

‐ 1.589

Maximum 127 Maximum 4.844

Second Largest 126.6 Second Largest 4.841

First Quartile 7.653 First Quartile 2.035

Median 14.17 Median 2.651

Third Quartile 29.8 Third Quartile 3.394

Mean 23.47 Mean 2.672

SD 24.05 SD 1.08

Coefficient of Variation 1.025

Skewness 2.115

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.18 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0544

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 58.03 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 68.31

90% UPL (t) 54.55 90% UPL (t) 58.44

90% Percentile (z) 54.29 90% Percentile (z) 57.77

95% Percentile (z) 63.03 95% Percentile (z) 85.52

99% Percentile (z) 79.42 99% Percentile (z) 178.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.153 Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 20.36

MLE of Mean 23.47

MLE of Standard Deviation 21.86

nu sta r 320.5

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.795 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.779 90% Percentile 56.87

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0762 95% Percentile 70.41

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0814 99% Percentile 120.7

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 64.45

90% Percentile 52.18 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 64.5

95% Percentile 66.89 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 64.5

99% Percentile 100.7 90% UPL 58.73

90% Chebyshev UP L 95.88

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 51.1 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 63.01

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 51.72

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 56.47

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 57.68

Lead

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 139 Number of Distinct Observation s 139

Number of Missing Value s 1

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.383 Minimum

‐ 0.96

NY UPL Results 207Maximum 261.4 Maximum 5.566

Second Largest 176.9 Second Largest 5.176

First Quartile 6.451 First Quartile 1.864

Median 15.14 Median 2.718

Third Quartile 27.3 Third Quartile 3.307

Mean 26.23 Mean 2.62

SD 36.09 SD 1.208

Coefficient of Variation 1.376

Skewness 3.464

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.243 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0776

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 78.08 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 77.9

90% UPL (t) 72.86 90% UPL (t) 65.42

90% Percentile (z) 72.48 90% Percentile (z) 64.58

95% Percentile (z) 85.59 95% Percentile (z) 100.2

99% Percentile (z) 110.2 99% Percentile (z) 228.2

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.888 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 29.53

MLE of Mean 26.23

MLE of Standard Deviation 27.83

nu sta r 246.9

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.749 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.788 90% Percentile 62.66

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.104 95% Percentile 93.29

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.082 99% Percentile 162.6

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.67

90% Percentile 62.18 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.67

95% Percentile 81.95 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.84

99% Percentile 128.3 90% UPL 63.52

90% Chebyshev UP L 134.9

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 59.33 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 58.57

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 59.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 66.28

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 66.94

Mercury

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 61 Number of Distinct Observation s 48

Number of Missing Value s 79

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.005 Minimum

‐ 5.298

Maximum 0.307 Maximum

‐ 1.181

Second Largest 0.3 Second Largest

‐ 1.204

NY UPL Results 208First Quartile 0.028 First Quartile

‐ 3.576

Median 0.076 Median

‐ 2.577

Third Quartile 0.13 Third Quartile

‐ 2.04

Mean 0.0879 Mean

‐ 2.907

SD 0.0744 SD 1.137

Coefficient of Variation 0.847

Skewness 1.139

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.149 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.127

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.113 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.113

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.201 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.309

90% UPL (t) 0.185 90% UPL (t) 0.241

90% Percentile (z) 0.183 90% Percentile (z) 0.234

95% Percentile (z) 0.21 95% Percentile (z) 0.354

99% Percentile (z) 0.261 99% Percentile (z) 0.769

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.143 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0769

MLE of Mean 0.0879

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0822

nu sta r 139.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.484 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.775 90% Percentile 0.17

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0782 95% Percentile 0.229

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.117 99% Percentile 0.303

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.22

90% Percentile 0.196 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.229

95% Percentile 0.251 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.22

99% Percentile 0.379 90% UPL 0.204

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.313

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.196 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.283

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.203

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.228

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.239

Total Metals

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 139 Number of Distinct Observation s 139

Number of Missing Value s 1

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.944 Minimum

‐ 0.0579

Maximum 328.3 Maximum 5.794

Second Largest 236.1 Second Largest 5.464

First Quartile 25.24 First Quartile 3.229

Median 44.81 Median 3.802

NY UPL Results 209Third Quartile 82.76 Third Quartile 4.416

Mean 61.63 Mean 3.729

SD 54.84 SD 0.965

Coefficient of Variation 0.89

Skewness 1.791

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.166 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0617

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0751

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 140.4 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 166.7

90% UPL (t) 132.5 90% UPL (t) 145

90% Percentile (z) 131.9 90% Percentile (z) 143.5

95% Percentile (z) 151.8 95% Percentile (z) 203.8

99% Percentile (z) 189.2 99% Percentile (z) 393.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.393 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 44.25

MLE of Mean 61.63

MLE of Standard Deviation 52.22

nu sta r 387.2

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.45 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.772 90% Percentile 140.5

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.058 95% Percentile 176.7

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.081 99% Percentile 226.3

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 163.1

90% Percentile 130.8 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 164.3

95% Percentile 164.6 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 163.3

99% Percentile 241.4 90% UPL 143.9

90% Chebyshev UP L 226.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 129.3 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 169

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 131.1

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 141.8

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 144.9

Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 138 Number of Distinct Observation s 52

Number of Missing Value s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 145 Minimum 4.977

Maximum 9940 Maximum 9.204

Second Largest 6460 Second Largest 8.773

First Quartile 679.3 First Quartile 6.521

Median 900 Median 6.802

Third Quartile 1200 Third Quartile 7.09

Mean 1097 Mean 6.818

NY UPL Results 210SD 1029 SD 0.545

Coefficient of Variation 0.938

Skewness 5.964

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.232 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0993

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0754 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0754

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2577 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2002

90% UPL (t) 2428 90% UPL (t) 1850

90% Percentile (z) 2417 90% Percentile (z) 1839

95% Percentile (z) 2790 95% Percentile (z) 2241

99% Percentile (z) 3492 99% Percentile (z) 3249

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.843 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 386

MLE of Mean 1097

MLE of Standard Deviation 650.8

nu sta r 784.7

A

‐ D Test Statistic 4.15 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.76 90% Percentile 1700

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.152 95% Percentile 2015

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0802 99% Percentile 5657

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1870

90% Percentile 1970 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1870

95% Percentile 2339 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1800

99% Percentile 3141 90% UPL 1710

90% Chebyshev UP L 4197

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1930 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1981

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1899

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2067

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2039

Fluoride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 8 Number of Distinct Observation s 8

Number of Missing Value s 73

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 37.66 Minimum 3.629

Maximum 658.8 Maximum 6.49

Second Largest 418.1 Second Largest 6.036

First Quartile 147.7 First Quartile 4.99

Median 234.5 Median 5.453

Third Quartile 409 Third Quartile 6.014

Mean 283.6 Mean 5.367

SD 200.7 SD 0.892

Coefficient of Variation 0.708

NY UPL Results 211Skewness 0.839

Warning: There are only 8 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.941 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.944

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 729 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1552

90% UPL (t) 584.9 90% UPL (t) 817.3

90% Percentile (z) 540.9 90% Percentile (z) 672.1

95% Percentile (z) 613.8 95% Percentile (z) 929.5

99% Percentile (z) 750.6 99% Percentile (z) 1708

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.289 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 220

MLE of Mean 283.6

MLE of Standard Deviation 249.8

nu sta r 20.63

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.171 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.725 90% Percentile 490.3

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.153 95% Percentile 574.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.298 99% Percentile 642

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 658.8

90% Percentile 613.4 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 658.8

95% Percentile 777.7 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 658.8

99% Percentile 1152 90% UPL 658.8

90% Chebyshev UP L 922.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 662.8 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 801.1

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 687.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 977.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1057

Total Halogens

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 137 Number of Distinct Observation s 59

Number of Missing Value s 3

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 145 Minimum 4.977

Maximum 9940 Maximum 9.204

Second Largest 6460 Second Largest 8.773

First Quartile 675 First Quartile 6.515

NY UPL Results 212Median 900 Median 6.802

Third Quartile 1300 Third Quartile 7.17

Mean 1113 Mean 6.832

SD 1034 SD 0.549

Coefficient of Variation 0.929

Skewness 5.895

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.222 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0933

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0757 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0757

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2599 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2043

90% UPL (t) 2449 90% UPL (t) 1886

90% Percentile (z) 2438 90% Percentile (z) 1875

95% Percentile (z) 2813 95% Percentile (z) 2289

99% Percentile (z) 3518 99% Percentile (z) 3328

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2.835 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 392.6

MLE of Mean 1113

MLE of Standard Deviation 661.1

nu sta r 776.8

A

‐ D Test Statistic 3.674 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.76 90% Percentile 1700

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.145 95% Percentile 2100

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0805 99% Percentile 5679

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1870

90% Percentile 1999 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1880

95% Percentile 2374 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1800

99% Percentile 3190 90% UPL 1720

90% Chebyshev UP L 4225

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1960 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2238

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1931

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2101

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2074

NY UPL Results 213MDL

Metals (mg/kg)

‐‐ 5.4 11.8 6.8 47.0 19.4 47 19.4

‐‐

‐‐ 206 119 250 32 141 32 141 161 451

‐‐

‐‐

Total Metals (mg/kg)

‐‐ 211. 4 130.8 256.8 79.0 160. 4 79.0 160. 4 161.0 451.0

* All 90% UPL Results reported as Normal MRL

= Method Reporting Limit

** 90% UPL Result reported as Lognormal MDL

= Method Detection Limit

*** 90% UPL Result Non

‐ Parametric HAP = Hazardous Air Pollutant

‐‐ = Non

‐ Detect OH = Organic Halogen

n.d.

= Only 1 Distinct Value, therefore no variance. N = Nitrogenated Lead (HAP)

Mercury (HAP) Arsenic (HAP)

Chromium (HAP)

Selenium (HAP)

Maine C&D Summary Table 21410.4 1.2 10.1

2 2 231

50 41 237 34 29 170 393 188 28 33 214 34 10 3

0.02 0.06 0.08

0.8 0.5 0.6

50.0 41.0 237.0 34.0 29.0 170.0 393.0 188.0 28.0 33.0 214.0 47.2 13.8 244.8 

# Maine C&D SUMMARY

Maine C&D Summary Table 215Non

‐

Detect Average Standard

Deviation

7.1 55 9.9 70 5 10.8 51 3 37 2 6.9 2.5 13.0 19.9 4 20.82

198 52 142 8 2 76 311 14 67 47 14 66 20 82.13 95.72

391 7 260 225 150 228 80 27 44 2 16 10 0 126.77 122.81

0.09 0.05 0.27 0.26 0.24 0.04 0.20 0.19 0.24 0.04 0.08 0.10 21.00 0.14 0.09

0.8 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.2 0.7 1 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.4 20 0.76 0.25

597.0 114.8 413.0 304.6 158. 4 315.5 443.2 44.8 148.9 51.5 37.8 79.0

‐‐ 174.89 146.5

Maine C&D Summary Table 216*all results reported as moisture free

*all results pooled from all 7 samples

Low High

1.20 70.00 53.86**

2.00 311.0 0 352.4**

2.0 451.0 312.4***

0.040 0.27 0.31**

0.40 1.3 1.107

13.76 597 426.9** Range

90% UPL

Results*

Maine C&D Summary Table 217

### Arsenic (HAP) Chromium (HAP) Lead (HAP) Mercury (HAP) Selenium (HAP) Total Metals (mg/kg)

22 15 35 14 15 35

5.4 206 211.4

11.8 119 130.8

6.8 250 256.8

47 32 79

19.4 141 160.4

47 32 79

19.4 141 160.4

161 161

451 451

50 50

41 41

237 237

34 34

29 29

170 170

393 393

188 188

28 28

33 33

214 214

10.4 2 34 0.02 0.8 47.2

1.2 2 10 0.06 0.5 13.76

10.1 231 3 0.08 0.6 244.78

7.1 198 391 0.09 0.8 596.99

55 52 7 0.05 0.7 114.75

9.9 142 260 0.27 0.8 412.97

70 8 225 0.26 1.3 304.56

5 2 150 0.24 1.2 158.44

10.8 76 228 0.04 0.7 315.54

51 311 80 0.2 1 443.2

3 14 27 0.19 0.6 44.79

37 67 44 0.24 0.7 148.94

2 47 2 0.04 0.5 51.54

6.9 14 16 0.08 0.8 37.78

2.5 66 10 0.1 0.4 79

Maine ProUCL Entry 218General Background Statistics for Full Data Set s

User Selected Option s

From File WorkSheet_a.wst

Full Precision OFF

Confidence Coefficient 90%

Coverage 90%

Different or Future K Values 1

Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000

Arsenic

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 22 Number of Distinct Observation s 20

Number of Missing Value s 13

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.2 Minimum 0.182

Maximum 70 Maximum 4.248

Second Largest 55 Second Largest 4.007

First Quartile 5.75 First Quartile 1.744

Median 10.25 Median 2.327

Third Quartile 32.6 Third Quartile 3.45

Mean 19.94 Mean 2.419

SD 20.82 SD 1.159

Coefficient of Variation 1.044

Skewness 1.181

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.794 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.957

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 56.1 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 84.05

90% UPL (t) 48.11 90% UPL (t) 53.86

90% Percentile (z) 46.62 90% Percentile (z) 49.59

95% Percentile (z) 54.18 95% Percentile (z) 75.54

99% Percentile (z) 68.37 99% Percentile (z) 166.4

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.899 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 22.19

MLE of Mean 19.94

MLE of Standard Deviation 21.04

nu sta r 39.54

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.692 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.771 90% Percentile 50.6

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.191 95% Percentile 54.8

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.191 99% Percentile 66.85

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 55

90% Percentile 47.14 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 55

95% Percentile 62.05 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 54.6

99% Percentile 96.95 90% UPL 53.8

Maine UPL Results 21990% Chebyshev UP L 83.8

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 48.16 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 72.88

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 48.84

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 63.48

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 66.29

Chromium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 15 Number of Distinct Observation s 12

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2 Minimum 0.693

Maximum 311 Maximum 5.74

Second Largest 231 Second Largest 5.442

First Quartile 11 First Quartile 2.359

Median 52 Median 3.951

Third Quartile 109 Third Quartile 4.643

Mean 82.13 Mean 3.426

SD 95.72 SD 1.756

Coefficient of Variation 1.165

Skewness 1.353

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.812 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.902

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.881 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.881

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 260.8 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 815.4

90% UPL (t) 215.1 90% UPL (t) 352.4

90% Percentile (z) 204.8 90% Percentile (z) 291.7

95% Percentile (z) 239.6 95% Percentile (z) 552.1

99% Percentile (z) 304.8 99% Percentile (z) 1826

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.545 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 150.8

MLE of Mean 82.13

MLE of Standard Deviation 111.3

nu sta r 16.34

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.344 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.784 90% Percentile 217.8

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.136 95% Percentile 255

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.232 99% Percentile 299.8

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 311

90% Percentile 218.2 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 279

95% Percentile 306 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 279

99% Percentile 520.2 90% UPL 263

90% Chebyshev UP L 378.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 233.1 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 256

Maine UPL Results 22090% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 245.9

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 347

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 389.2

Lead

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 35 Number of Distinct Observation s 31

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 2 Minimum 0.693

Maximum 451 Maximum 6.111

Second Largest 393 Second Largest 5.974

First Quartile 30.5 First Quartile 3.417

Median 80 Median 4.382

Third Quartile 210 Third Quartile 5.347

Mean 126.8 Mean 4.162

SD 122.8 SD 1.404

Coefficient of Variation 0.969

Skewness 1.038

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.854 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.922

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.934 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.934

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 324.8 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 618.2

90% UPL (t) 289.6 90% UPL (t) 413

90% Percentile (z) 284.2 90% Percentile (z) 388.2

95% Percentile (z) 328.8 95% Percentile (z) 646.7

99% Percentile (z) 412.5 99% Percentile (z) 1684

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.809 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 156.8

MLE of Mean 126.8

MLE of Standard Deviation 141

nu sta r 56.6

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.702 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.782 90% Percentile 256

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.135 95% Percentile 391.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.154 99% Percentile 431.3

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 391

90% Percentile 307.5 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 392.2

95% Percentile 409.7 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 391

99% Percentile 650.8 90% UPL 312.4

90% Chebyshev UP L 500.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 311.1 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 479.3

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 323.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 387.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 414.1

Maine UPL Results 221Mercury

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 15 Number of Distinct Observation s 12

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.02 Minimum

‐ 3.912

Maximum 0.27 Maximum

‐ 1.309

Second Largest 0.26 Second Largest

‐ 1.347

First Quartile 0.055 First Quartile

‐ 2.905

Median 0.09 Median

‐ 2.408

Third Quartile 0.22 Third Quartile

‐ 1.518

Mean 0.131 Mean

‐ 2.313

SD 0.0911 SD 0.821

Coefficient of Variation 0.698

Skewness 0.429

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.862 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.921

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.881 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.881

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.301 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.458

90% UPL (t) 0.257 90% UPL (t) 0.31

90% Percentile (z) 0.247 90% Percentile (z) 0.283

95% Percentile (z) 0.281 95% Percentile (z) 0.382

99% Percentile (z) 0.343 99% Percentile (z) 0.669

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.602 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.0816

MLE of Mean 0.131

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.103

nu sta r 48.05

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.575 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.748 90% Percentile 0.252

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.185 95% Percentile 0.263

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.224 99% Percentile 0.269

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.27

90% Percentile 0.268 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.266

95% Percentile 0.333 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.266

99% Percentile 0.479 90% UPL 0.264

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.413

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.278 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.468

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.284

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.362

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.378

Maine UPL Results 222Selenium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 15 Number of Distinct Observation s 8

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.4 Minimum

‐ 0.916

Maximum 1.3 Maximum 0.262

Second Largest 1.2 Second Largest 0.182

First Quartile 0.6 First Quartile

‐ 0.511

Median 0.7 Median

‐ 0.357

Third Quartile 0.8 Third Quartile

‐ 0.223

Mean 0.76 Mean

‐ 0.323

SD 0.25 SD 0.321

Coefficient of Variation 0.329

Skewness 0.875

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.919 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.965

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.881 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.881

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.227 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.318

90% UPL (t) 1.107 90% UPL (t) 1.131

90% Percentile (z) 1.081 90% Percentile (z) 1.093

95% Percentile (z) 1.171 95% Percentile (z) 1.228

99% Percentile (z) 1.342 99% Percentile (z) 1.528

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 8.445 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.09

MLE of Mean 0.76

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.262

nu sta r 253.3

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.35 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.737 90% Percentile 1.12

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.193 95% Percentile 1.23

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.221 99% Percentile 1.286

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.3

90% Percentile 1.108 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.26

95% Percentile 1.235 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.26

99% Percentile 1.496 90% UPL 1.24

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.535

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.118 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1.1

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.12E+00

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.275

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.284

Maine UPL Results 223Total Metals

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 35 Number of Distinct Observation s 32

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 13.76 Minimum 2.622

Maximum 597 Maximum 6.392

Second Largest 451 Second Largest 6.111

First Quartile 48.6 First Quartile 3.883

Median 158.4 Median 5.065

Third Quartile 240.9 Third Quartile 5.484

Mean 174.9 Mean 4.769

SD 146.5 SD 0.972

Coefficient of Variation 0.838

Skewness 1.125

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.878 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.952

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.934 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.934

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 411.2 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 564.4

90% UPL (t) 369.1 90% UPL (t) 426.9

90% Percentile (z) 362.7 90% Percentile (z) 409.1

95% Percentile (z) 415.9 95% Percentile (z) 582.2

99% Percentile (z) 515.8 99% Percentile (z) 1129

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.306 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 133.9

MLE of Mean 174.9

MLE of Standard Deviation 153

nu sta r 91.45

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.467 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.768 90% Percentile 405

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.131 95% Percentile 445.5

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.152 99% Percentile 547.4

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 443.2

90% Percentile 377 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 443.2

95% Percentile 477.4 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 447.9

99% Percentile 706.1 90% UPL 425.1

90% Chebyshev UP L 620.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 381.3 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 529.3

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 388.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 457.9

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 474.4

Maine UPL Results 224*allresultsreportedasmoisturefree*allresultspooledfromall7samplesAverageStandardDeviationLow HighComponents19.20 6.95 3.90 38.5 29.7**4.99 3.86 0.49 20 10.02***81.14 0.31 80.57 81.44 81.6118.22 0.31 17.85 18.78 18.696.00 0.05 5.95 6.12 6.12***50.51 0.16 50.20 50.72 50.750.24 0.25 0.08 1.26 0.644***42.60 0.23 42.36 43.08 43.080.13 0.11 0.01 0.731 0.202***8091 864 5468 11699 9167***Metals(mg/kg)2.60 3.56 0.17 16.6 6.942**26.12 39.55 0.10 220 67.06**0.088 0.080 0.008 0.2 0.2***0.27 0.23 0.00 1.773 0.401***39.01 49.86 0.20 311 99.97**0.90 0.41 0.38 1.63 1.527**44.01 69.95 0.4 451.0 103.1**65.89 29.50 31.0 156 103.6**0.09 0.76 0.005 0.580 0.182***2.47 2.44 0.98 12.2 4.789***0.65 0.28 0.27 1.3 1.0TotalMetals(mg/kg)111.0 111.5 0.94 597 278.2***Formaldehyde(g/kg)48841.00 36196.00 9300 130000 107423**Ions6.14 0.38 6 7 7***933 990 47 9940 1640***64.58 124.60 5 659 212.8***TotalHalogens(mg/kg)899 987 13.3 9940 1600***VolatileCompounds(g/kg)Chlorobenzene(HAP/OH)Selenium(HAP)1,1,2‐Trichloroethane(HAP/OH)1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane(HAP/OH)Fluorine(mg/kg)Chlorine(mg/kg)FixedCarbon(wt%)Hydrogen(wt%)Bromoform(HAP/OH)Benzene(HAP)Allylchloride(HAP/OH)Acrylonitrile(HAP/N)Lead(HAP)Cobalt(HAP)1,4‐Dichlorobenzene(p)(HAP/OH)1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene(HAP/OH)Bromine(mg/kg)FormaldehydeAcrolein(HAP)Acetonitrile(HAP/N)Nickel(HAP)Chromium(HAP)Cadmium(HAP)Beryllium(HAP)Arsenic(HAP)Mercury(HAP)Manganese(HAP)HeatingValue(BTU/lb)Antimony(HAP)Range90%UPLResults*Sulfur(wt%)Oxygen(wt%)Nitrogen(wt%)Carbon(wt%)Ash(wt%)VolatileMatter(wt%)Moisture(wt%)CompleteC&DSummaryTable225VinylchlorideEthylbenzene(HAP)Chloroprene(HAP/OH)Chloroform(HAP/OH)Methylmethacrylate(HAP)m,p‐Xylenes(HAP)Isopropylbenzene(HAP)Hexachlorobutadiene(HAP/OH)Toluene(HAP)Tetrachloroethylene(HAP/OH)Styrene(HAP)o‐Xylenes(HAP)n‐Hexane(HAP)Naphthalene(HAP)Methylenechloride(HAP/OH)Methyltertbutylether(HAP)CompleteC&DSummaryTable226TotalVolatileCompounds(g/kg)Semi‐VolatileCompounds(g/kg)TotalSemi‐VolatileCompounds(g/kg)*All90%UPLResultsreportedasNormal MRL=MethodReportingLimit**90%UPLResultreportedasLognormal MDL=MethodDetectionLimit***90%UPLResultNon‐Parametric HAP=HazardousAirPollutant‐‐=Non‐Detect OH=OrganicHalogenn.d.=Only1DistinctValue,thereforenovariance. N=NitrogenatedPyrenePhenolPhenanthrenePentachlorophenol(HAP/OH)Nitrobenzene(HAP/N)Naphthalene(HAP)Benzo(a)pyreneBenzo(a)anthraceneChryseneBis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate(HAP)Biphenyl(HAP)Benzo(k)fluorantheneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzo(b)fluorantheneIndeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyreneHexachloroethaneDimethylphthalate(HAP)Dibenzofurans(D/F)Dibenz(a,h)anthraceneHexachlorocyclopentadiene(HAP/OH)Hexachlorobutadiene(HAP/OH)Hexachlorobenzene(HAP/OH)FluoreneFluoranthene1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene(HAP/OH)2‐MethylnaphthaleneAnthraceneAnilineAcetophenoneAcenaphthyleneAcenaphthene4‐Nitrophenol(HAP/N)3,3‐Dichlorobenzidene(HAP/OH/N)2,4‐Dinitrotoluene(HAP/N)2,4‐Dinitrophenol(HAP/N)2,4,6‐Trichlorophenol(HAP/OH)2,4,5‐Trichlorophenol(HAP/OH)1‐Methylnaphthalene1,4‐Dichlorobenzene(HAP/OH)CompleteC&DSummaryTable227CompleteC&DSummaryTable228CompleteC&DSummaryTable229CompleteC&DSummaryTable230

### 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52 ABCDE FGH I

Moisture ( w Ash (wt%) Volatile M a Fixed Carb o Hydrogen ( Carbon (w t Nitrogen ( w Oxygen (w t Sulfur (wt %

177 177 7 7 7 7 47 7 186

12.05 0.64 81.24 18.13 6.12 50.56 0.25 42.41 0.018

13.03 0.65 80.57 18.78 6 50.57 0.2 42.58 0.01

15.2 0.7 80.89 18.42 5.99 50.5 0.22 42.57 0.015

14.91 0.68 81.37 17.96 6 50.72 0.23 42.36 0.009

14.1 0.7 81.44 17.85 5.98 50.53 0.19 42.57 0.021

13.87 0.63 81.24 18.13 5.99 50.48 0.29 42.6 0.014

13.45 0.52 81.24 18.24 5.95 50.2 0.23 43.08 0.018

0.77 0.455

1.26 0.516

0.7 0.608

0.76 0.625

0.55 0.486

0.39 0.394

0.27 0.136

0.42 0.731

0.63 0.61

0.55 0.355

15.87 0.55 0.09 0.18

19.63 0.57 0.14 0.17

18.47 1.5 0.09 0.17

14.88 0.58 0.09 0.18

30.34 0.53 0.11 0.15

23 0.74 0.16 0.16

13.3 0.67 0.09 0.18

16.6 0.76 0.09 0.18

15.1 0.6 0.16 0.18

15.75 0.89 0.09 0.18

19.6 1.06 0.15 0.17

22.7 0.67 0.08 0.16

14.5 0.52 0.09 0.18

13.94 0.71 0.12 0.18

28.3 0.96 0.11 0.15

20.82 0.68 0.08 0.17

21.4 1.22 0.08 0.17

20.3 0.99 0.15 0.17

22 0.87 0.08 0.16

16.86 0.65 0.09 0.17

Complete ProUCL Entry 231

### 53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104 ABCDE FGH I

9.12 0.76 0.2 0.19

31.9 0.9 0.08 0.14

18.87 1.09 0.21 0.17

11.4 0.56 0.09 0.19

15.7 0.6 0.09 0.18

18.6 0.66 0.09 0.17

14 0.55 0.09 0.18

12.78 0.82 0.14 0.18

12.7 0.76 0.09 0.18

17.5 0.49 0.09 0.17

12.6 4.347826 0.148741

3.9 5.202914 0.208117

6.5 4.171123 0.213904

8.3 5.452563 0.119956

15.13 3.416991 0.106045

16.6 2.673861 0.047962

3.9 4.786681 0.083247

22.4 3.092784 0.064433

21.7 3.57599 0.178799

12.4 4.56621 0.159817

22.5 5.935484 0.193548

13.86 4.527513 0.023218

6.55 4.173355 0.064205

8.6 3.938731 0.131291

11.1 13.27334

13 9.609195 0.114943

12.3 4.561003 0.04561

13.3 9.457901 0.034602

16.9 3.610108 0.048135

16.9 7.340554 0.09627

18.4 3.063725 0.04902

21.8 3.516624 0.076726

22.5 10.45161 0.180645

22.2 5.912596 0.115681

5.5 9.312169 0.10582

Complete ProUCL Entry 232

### 105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 ABCDE FGH I

17.9 4.263094 0.097442

16.6 2.997602 0.131894

19.2 3.465347 0.123762

15.1 6.360424 0.176678

14.3 7.584597 0.233372

10.7 9.070549 0.235162

19.2 6.559406 0.19802

15.4 7.446809 0.141844

19.8 4.613466 0.124688

15.4 2.836879 0.082742

12.2 6.378132 0.148064

15.9 3.210464 0.118906

14.8 2.816901 0.08216

13.8 2.900232 0.023202

13.9 2.555168 0.10453

17 2.168675 0.084337

16.6 2.63789 0.035971

14.5 9.94152 0.128655

15.3 2.609209 0.070838

16 2.142857 0.059524

15 2.117647 0.058824

10.7 1.903695 0.055991

10.2 1.781737 0.044543

11 2.808989 0.022472

15.7 10.64057 0.094899

15.6 14.69194 0.130332

16.4 3.349282 0.107656

23.7 2.621232 0.131062

18.2 2.811736 0.0978

9.1 8.030803 0.154015

22.6 6.072351 0.193798

11.5 2.033898 0.090395

13 2.298851 0.057471

15.9 1.664685 0.047562

13.9 7.200929 0.034843

15.8 4.869359 0.059382

12.5 3.12 0.022857

24.3 10.33025 0.02642

33 20 0.029851

21.2 6.472081 0.025381

24.3 4.227213 0.02642

29.1 10.86037 0.028209

25.7 8.748318 0.040377

21.54 5.901096 0.038236

11.3 9.244645 0.033822

10.8 5.829596 0.044843

13.3 3.921569 0.023068

30 6.171429 0.071429

24.3 9.643329 0.264201

27.9 5.131761 0.041609

26.34 13.30437 0.054304

21.52 4.689093 0.050968

Complete ProUCL Entry 233

### 157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208 ABCDE FGH I

22.91 13.52964 0.038916

20.34 3.288978 0.03766

21.93 8.99193 0.051236

19.16 2.684315 0.03711

11.3 9.131905 0.157835

15.9 12.96076 0.035672

16.6 6.954436 0.215827

14.8 7.511737 0.058685

28.8 16.99438 0.224719

30.8 7.225434 0.144509

32.7 14.48737 0.044577

38 6.290323 0.032258

29.1 6.06488 0.042313

23.6 8.376963 0.078534

20.9 9.102402 0.025284

21.9 8.706786 0.038412

30.8 9.176301 0.187861

15.5 5.727811 0.071006

18.16 3.103617 0.097752

16.1 8.057211 0.107271

24.2 7.519789 0.105541

29.2 3.531073 0.056497

32.7 9.955423 0.148588

30.3 3.299857 0.086083

21.6 4.655612 0.114796

25.29 6.960246 0.174006

14.18 2.854812 0.069914

19.3 2.688971 0.074349

15.33 4.806897 0.035432

16.18 4.533524 0.035791

15.8 3.491686 0.035629

18 3.536585 0.109756

20.2 5.263158 0.288221

23.8 5.11811 0.052493

22.4 3.608247 0.03866

23.2 2.473958 0.065104

20.2 4.260652 0.062657

23.93 4.206652 0.144604

13.8 3.480278 0.046404

17.16 4.732014 0.060357

21.88 4.83871 0.038402

16.4 6.722488 0.179426

20.03 8.078029 0.200075

22.37 7.175061 0.141698

26.6 7.820163 0.190736

30.23 5.145478 0.214992

33.39 11.57484 0.16514

28.4 6.075419 0.083799

31.18 8.660273 0.087184

28.81 4.677623 0.042141

21.64 3.177642 0.063808

29.22 5.495903 0.127155

Complete ProUCL Entry 234

### 209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254 ABCDE FGH I

38.5 3.821138 0.146341

32.27 6.023918 0.132881

28.12 16.16583 0.083472

21.8 10.26854 0.051151

28.93 15.46363 0.126636

18.27 4.649456 0.15906

27.2 1.373626 0.151099

20.16 2.830661 0.175351

38.5 11.90244 0.097561

23.35 1.604697 0.039139

34.01 7.440521 0.106077

Complete ProUCL Entry 235

### 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52 J K LMNO P Q R S

Heating Va Antimony Arsenic (H A Beryllium ( Cadmium ( Chromium Cobalt (H A Lead (HAP ) Manganes e Mercury ( H

187 22 236 22 125 231 22 251 22 152

8644 0.59 65.7 0.008 0.25 73.2 0.38 96.8 41.5 0.049

8254 0.18 2.21 0.008 0.18 4.1 0.41 41.3 55.3 0.04

8423 0.37 16.9 0.008 0.14 21.2 0.46 12.5 39.4 0.017

8624 0.17 1.95 0.008 0.13 3.01 0.51 34.6 44.1 0.032

8624 0.41 11.2 0.008 0.14 14 0.41 8.78 38.6 0.015

8033 0.35 13.8 0.008 0.13 16.2 0.62 15.7 39.1 0.02

8805 0.43 50.4 0.008 0.14 60.1 1.52 22 156 0.027

7600 16.6 8.2 0.03 0.26 12.3 0.83 26 54.6 0.143

7620 3.6 6.8 0.03 0.27 10.2 0.77 10.6 62.6 0.0188

7310 4.2 8.9 0.17 0.31 10.8 1.37 5.5 79.3 0.0778

7140 2.9 3.6 0.08 0.33 5.51 1.34 12.2 69.4 0.0284

6820 2.4 14.3 0.11 0.51 46 1.63 11.6 78.3 0.051

7170 1.8 11.6 0.04 0.34 14.4 1.18 7.8 65.5 0.0468

7920 0.6 6.3 0.07 0.18 6.86 0.67 3.8 56.3 0.0367

6460 3.5 26.2 0.17 0.33 34.3 1.58 13.2 127 0.0632

6770 7.4 5.1 0.13 0.32 7.2 1.45 7 90.5 0.0733

7900 1.7 13.2 0.05 0.26 15.1 0.78 8.3 63.1 0.0614

7157 57 0.4 60 20 0.08

6702 100 0.4 100 60 0.08

6900 80 0.4 80 210 0.08

7172 2 22 0.2 0.4 26 0.8 17 73 0.3

5587 11 0.4 13 61 0.08

6617 6.3 0.39 8.2 18 0.08

7434 44 0.39 59 71 0.08

7059 2 92 0.2 0.39 130 0.79 130 31 0.08

7243 210 0.4 240 9.5 0.08

7022 4 0.4 4 15 0.1

6872 150 0.4 180 19 0.08

6251 2 37 0.2 0.39 43 0.78 8.5 47 0.07

6444 47 0.39 50 8.9 0.07

6568 210 0.4 220 32 0.08

6035 13 0.4 16 26 0.08

6763 2 180 0.2 0.39 180 0.78 21 80 0.08

6608 110 0.39 120 230 0.08

6676 140 0.39 170 17 0.08

6481 21 0.39 28 110 0.08

6947 2 52 0.2 0.4 68 0.8 240 58 0.08

66 83 37 0.08

64 68 56 0.08

95 100 33 0.08

27 30 47 0.08

42 48 19 0.08

7.5 8.5 23 0.08

45 53 16 0.08

15 20 52 0.08

120 130 16 0.08

32 37 17 0.08

40 50 13 0.08

50 56 5 0.08

47 50 6.6 0.08

Complete ProUCL Entry 236

### 53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104 J K LMNO P Q R S

65 86 8.8 0.08

29 32 20 0.08

89 100 12 0.08

76 82 20 0.08

46 52 9.7 0.08

34 37 18 0.08

54 62 56 0.08

7655 170 0.4 200 2.2 0.08

5468 16 0.4 9.6 26 0.07

6427 54 0.39 99 150 0.35

7713 140 0.4 150 18 0.08

6541 110 0.39 120 10 0.08

6935 14 0.39 16 19 0.07

7159 18 0.41 34 90 0.08

7435 2.7 0.4 2 120 0.08

6918 15 0.4 19 280 0.08

6875 0.94 0.4 0.49 6.1 0.08

150 170 2 0.08

22 21 5.4 0.08

177 30 35 0.58

43 52 2.5 0.08

220 220 2 0.08

9.7 9.7 12 0.08

18 18 20 0.08

1.2 0.9 6.9 0.08

5.9 6.4 6.5 0.12

6.1 5.3 2.4 0.08

9330.664 2.28833 0.343249 2.860412 10.64073

8455.775 0.104058 0.114464 2.185224 5.931322

8308.021 0.983957 0.171123 2.780749 22.99465

8095.965 3.947655 0.141767 12.54089 5.997819

8707.435 1.767409 0.353482 10.01532 6.4805

8383.693 3.717026 0.035971 2.877698 0.839329

8328.824 5.202914 0.020812 13.94381 23.30905

9292.526 6.443299 0.180412 13.65979 5.927835

9206.897 4.853129 0.217114 4.980843 9.45083

9028.539 2.16895 0.057078 5.479452 2.968037

8335.484 1.612903 0.090323 4.116129 7.870968

9283.724 0.010448 7.778036 3.830973

8240.77 0.321027 21.08079 2.140182

8718.818 0.656455 0.098468 3.938731 5.689278

7599.55 18.22272 0.899888 41.73228 19.91001

7780.46 37.47126 0.091954 0.574713 5.977011

8746.864 6.157355 0.079818 7.753706 4.104903

8238.754 82.12226 0.265283 76.93195 21.22261

8389.892 2.406739 0.048135 2.76775 3.128761

8932.611 12.39471 0.048135 6.618532 22.38267

9291.667 12.7451 0.526961 16.05392 5.637255

8207.161 4.859335 0.127877 5.11509 0.511509

8477.419 6.967742 0.180645 11.48387 19.22581

8962.725 3.084833 0.282776 7.197943 7.326478

8271.958 4.973545 0.126984 10.05291 33.22751

Complete ProUCL Entry 237

### 105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 J K LMNO P Q R S

10669.91 27.77101 0.146163 44.94519 6.577345

11699.04 2.398082 0.095923 11.99041 16.30695

9297.03 13.73762 0.061881 12.99505 6.559406

8935.218 0.117786 0.235571 10.83628 14.01649

7987.165 4.434072 0.058343 12.25204 12.48541

7573.348 1.231803 1.12E

‐ 06 12.87794 12.87794

9017.327 4.70297 0.049505 9.034653 13.36634

8034.279 26.83215 1.77305 37.35225 31.32388

8284.289 18.82793 0.049875 20.69825 5.236908

8427.896 2.836879 0.165485 5.319149 5.082742

8690.205 3.758542 0.148064 8.542141 19.36219

8694.411 4.042806 0.344828 7.372176 6.420927

8816.901 0.117371 0.140845 4.225352 9.15493

8800.464 2.784223 0.359629 19.37355 81.67053

8577.236 8.943089 0.301974 12.77584 7.317073

8530.12 12.28916 0.192771 17.22892 7.951807

9224.221 29.13669 0.203837 42.92566 8.872902

7857.31 19.76608 0.807018 28.65497 44.32749

9213.695 4.604486 1.07438 8.854782 5.430933

8267.857 9.285714 0.059524 14.16667 3.809524

9077.647 4 0.105882 11.17647 10

9359.462 15.67749 0.134378 17.4692 176.9317

9230.512 10.91314 0.178174 22.049 15.14477

9165.169 4.606742 0.078652 18.8764 3.483146

8465.006 2.384342 0.403321 70.22539 15.18387

8581.754 2.725118 0.248815 127.0142 39.21801

9232.057 32.41627 0.825359 58.73206 3.4689

9251.638 0.655308 0.013106 4.980341 1.310616

9172.372 0.855746 0.0978 4.889976 4.645477

7388.339 3.740374 0.231023 13.09131 17.16172

8727.39 2.842377 0.103359 11.24031 10.85271

8700.565 1.355932 0.011299 6.327684 1.242938

9174.713 0.689655 0.068966 7.126437 2.988506

9199.762 5.469679 0.011891 10.22592 1.070155

7620.209 3.948897 0.081301 16.37631 11.96283

8072.447 29.57245 0.106888 42.75534 14.60808

8352 17.37143 0.331429 49.6 2.857143

7552.18 18.09775 0.06605 44.64993 18.09775

6662.687 7.61194 0.208955 31.64179 12.38806

8220.812 3.807107 0.025381 23.73096 4.822335

8441.215 22.06077 0.488771 56.40687 4.227213

7296.192 4.019746 0.112835 72.07334 3.223857

7858.681 4.710633 0.349933 126.6487 26.9179

8130.257 2.803977 0.522559 29.18685 14.5297

7597.52 14.65614 0.225479 34.38557 21.646

8041.48 15.80717 0.672646 32.84753 132.8475

8126.874 11.64937 0.080738 24.79815 7.843137

8040 7.5 0.071429 29.71429 16.85714

8025.099 6.869221 0.07926 16.38045 24.57067

7593.62 12.20527 0.097087 59.50069 10.54092

7097.475 10.72495 0.067879 68.55824 36.11187

8019.878 2.535678 0.089195 21.50866 23.99337

Complete ProUCL Entry 238

### 157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208 J K LMNO P Q R S

7745.492 3.982358 0.285381 35.54287 31.32702

8306.553 3.803666 8.084359 13.73337 0.007

7735.366 18.53465 34.90457 37.82503 0.035

8313.953 13.33498 19.56952 16.57595 0.016

7942.503 52.64938 98.30891 27.28298 0.051

7626.635 21.75981 74.31629 36.74197 0.049

8173.861 3.717026 15.58753 12.82974 0.035

8071.596 2.112676 24.76526 62.44131 0.096

7008.427 20.92697 48.03371 39.04494 0.08

8109.827 5.057803 26.15607 28.03468 0.06

7292.719 10.54978 24.21991 77.86033 0.01

8151.613 55.16129 64.67742 43.22581 0.008

7902.68 6.06488 9.873061 34.69676 0.01

7727.749 7.198953 20.02618 35.60209 0.1

8040.455 42.09861 9.102402 7.079646 0.13

8088.348 3.96927 25.60819 86.68374 0.14

7955.202 51.01156 64.45087 82.51445 0.052

8285.207 4.118343 6.343195 26.3787 0.048

8583.822 3.164712 7.221408 13.36755 0.028

7938.021 110.0596 110.9774 14.9702 0.077

8307.388 15.96306 10.81794 8.311346 0.009

8435.028

7989.599 42.94205 60.77266 70.43091 0.013

8358.68 16.9297 31.56385 14.63415 0.026

8321.429 18.11224 44.13265 63.52041 0.076

8064.516 10.97577 29.58105 98.78196 0.307

8606.385 1.246796 0.699138 2.913074 0.026

8731.103 2.094176 4.708798 2.726146 0.012

8505.964 1.936932 1.440888 0.649581 0.08

8569.554 1.562873 1.562873 0.978287 0.053

8578.385 15.91449 12.8266 23.6342 0.1

8363.415 30.2439 29.87805 27.31707 0.26

8746.867 27.56892 23.5589 18.29574 0.005

8625.984 10.76115 13.12336 38.58268 0.005

8487.113 10.69588 12.8866 14.04639 0.005

8196.615 5.338542 7.552083 23.82813 0.005

8397.243 2.882206 4.761905 18.42105 0.076

6969.896 7.098725 11.17392 35.62508 0.22

8561.485 8.816705 12.64501 15.19722 0.17

8611.782 5.35973 7.436021 18.50555 0.135

8475.422 12.41679 18.6892 92.67793 0.16

8234.45 14.19856 18.39713 50.89713 0.13

8623.234 11.92947 16.74378 115.0306 0.212

8478.681 8.823908 13.71892 139.173 0.127

8782.016 3.514986 8.147139 34.6049 0.026

9217.429 1.662606 2.508241 10.69227 0.036

8455.187 4.02342 7.236151 12.7008 0.045

8593.575 25.89385 36.22905 22.5 0.146

8204.01 26.30049 40.39523 261.4066 0.229

8502.599 1.236129 5.183312 21.99747 0.128

8786.371 0.280755 0.204186 0.382848 0.076

8506.64 6.357728 15.2868 26.99915 0.154

Complete ProUCL Entry 239

### 209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254 J K LMNO P Q R S

8497.561 13.39837 27.41463 135.5772 0.156

8290.27 12.1069 17.17112 41.50303 0.089

7591.82 23.12187 9.599332 20.67334 0.062

8135.55 17.03325 20.97187 14.34783 0.097

8262.277 2.729703 5.895596 21.79541 0.146

8557.445 13.83825 17.44769 43.65594 0.079

8336.538 2.678571 3.626374 4.162088 0.054

8772.545 14.95491 28.54459 21.54309 0.063

8211.382 7.154472 46.50407 18.37398 0.3

8468.363 6.484018 12.00261 22.3092 0.07

8140.627 23.30656 40.44552 22.4731 0.161

5.4 206

11.8 119

6.8 250

47 32

19.4 141

47 32

19.4 141

161

451

50

41

237

34

29

170

393

188

28

33

214

10.4 2 34 0.02

1.2 2 10 0.06

10.1 231 3 0.08

7.1 198 391 0.09

55 52 7 0.05

9.9 142 260 0.27

70 8 225 0.26

5 2 150 0.24

10.8 76 228 0.04

51 311 80 0.2

3 14 27 0.19

37 67 44 0.24

2 47 2 0.04

6.9 14 16 0.08

2.5 66 10 0.1

Complete ProUCL Entry 240

### 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52 T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC

Nickel (HA Selenium ( Formaldeh y Bromine ( m Chlorine ( m Fluorine (mg/kg) Total Meta Total Halogens

22 30 17 7 175 49 251 184

2.44 0.29 15000 6 110 25 281.207 141

2.34 0.27 34000 6 95 24 106.338 125

1.2 0.27 18000 6 90 5 92.465 101

1.31 0.27 16000 7 110 25 86.09 142

1.35 0.27 17000 6 90 6 75.183 102

1.06 0.31 9300 6 90 6 87.298 102

5.05 0.27 110000 6 130 25 295.945 161

2.65 49000 1120 121.613 1120

1.26 130000 797 96.1488 797

2.93 0.6 46000 660 37 114.1578 697

2.16 46000 1340 97.5484 1340

12.2 0.6 29000 1960 47 167.701 2007

2.78 0.6 60000 1530 106.0868 1530

1.29 35000 179 76.1067 179

4.18 44000 516 47 210.5232 563

2.74 62000 597 42 121.9133 639

2.49 110000 385 105.0414 385

99 11.9 137.48 110.9

130 13.5 260.48 143.5

165 10.3 370.48 175.3

0.99 0.8 79.5 23.1 143.49 102.6

124 19.5 85.48 143.5

62 18.4 32.97 80.4

53.7 29.3 174.47 83

0.98 0.79 60.6 12.5 388.23 73.1

154 20.3 459.98 174.3

155 29.6 23.5 184.6

86.9 18.7 349.48 105.6

0.98 0.78 72.3 12.1 140.7 84.4

89.4 17.7 106.36 107.1

150 13.9 462.48 163.9

104.1 31.8 55.48 135.9

0.98 0.99 72.73 11.2 466.42 83.93

46.6 11.37 460.47 57.97

178.4 16.2 327.47 194.6

67.1 19.4 159.47 86.5

0.99 1 136 37.7 423.47 173.7

186.08

188.08

228.08

104.08

109.08

39.08

114.08

87.08

266.08

86.08

103.08

111.08

103.68

Complete ProUCL Entry 241

### 53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104 T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC

159.88

81.08

201.08

178.08

107.78

89.08

172.08

23.2 372.68 23.2

14.1 52.07 14.1

33.9 303.74 33.9

13.3 308.48 13.3

28.9 240.47 28.9

14.9 49.46 14.9

16.6 142.49 16.6

17.2 125.18 17.2

33.8 314.48 33.8

31.8 8.01 31.8

322.08

48.48

242.58

97.58

442.08

31.48

56.08

9.08

18.92

13.88

800 16.13272 800

1700 8.335068 1700

1400 26.93048 1400

1100 22.62814 1100

1000 18.61671 1000

400 7.470024 400

1300 42.47659 1300

830 26.21134 830

1000 19.50192 1000

1400 10.67352 1400

1500 13.69032 1500

1300 11.61946 1300

600 23.542 600

700 10.38293 700

80.7649

1100 44.11494 1100

1300 18.09578 1300

1100 180.5421 1100

600 8.351384 600

1000 41.44404 1000

700 34.96324 700

500 10.61381 500

37.85806

1800 17.89203 1800

2100 48.38095 2100

Complete ProUCL Entry 242

### 105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC

800 79.43971 800

600 30.79137 600

800 33.35396 800

1100 25.20612 1100

1600 29.22987 1600

1700 26.98768 1700

1200 27.15347

1100 97.28132 1100

1100 44.81297 1100

800 13.40426 800

900 31.81093 900

900 18.18074 900

600 13.6385 600

700 104.1879 700

700 29.33798 700

700 37.66265 700

700 81.13909 700

700 93.55556 700

1100 19.96458 1100

1100 27.32143 1100

1100 25.28235 1100

1700 210.2128 1700

700 48.28508 700

700 27.04494 700

794 88.19692 794

856 169.2062 856

900 95.44258 900

1600 6.959371 1600

1000 10.489 1000

1500 34.22442 1500

1900 25.03876 1900

1600 8.937853 1600

800 10.87356 800

600 16.77765 600

900 32.36934 900

1600 87.04276 1600

1500 70.16 1500

1500 80.91149 1500

900 51.85075 900

900 32.38579 900

800 83.18362 800

1000 79.42978 1000

600 158.6272 600

6460 47.04308 6460

900 70.91319 900

800 182.1749 800

600 44.3714 600

900 155.7143 54.14286 1055.714

900 47.8996 900

800 658.8072 82.34397 1458.807

900 418.1374 115.4629 1318.137

700 212.7931 48.12691 912.7931

Complete ProUCL Entry 243

### 157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208 T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC

737 406.0189 71.13763 1143.019

600 37.66006 25.62839 637.6601

1900 256.1804 91.29925 2156.18

900 123.7011 49.49646 1023.701

653 178.2923 653

640 132.8671 640

895 32.16929 895

1000 89.41525 1000

970 108.0856 970

900 59.30855 900

1115 112.64 1115

800 163.0725 800

800 50.6447 800

900 62.92723 900

1200 58.41066 1200

1400 116.4012 1400

820 198.0289 820

760 36.88824 760

675 23.78167 675

9940 236.0842 9940

640 35.10135 640

2200 2200

1300 174.1586 1300

1800 63.15369 1800

1300 125.8413 1300

1500 139.6458 1500

900 4.885007 900

980 9.54112 980

1000 4.1074 1000

1000 4.157032 1000

2000 52.4753 2000

2100 87.69902 2100

1300 69.42856 1300

600 62.47219 600

500 37.63387 500

900 36.72375 900

700 26.14116 700

2200 54.11773 2200

300 36.82893 300

857 31.4363 857

820 123.9439 820

692 83.62282 692

645 143.9159 645

569 161.8428 569

586 46.29303 586

374 14.89912 374

500 24.00537 500

584 84.76891 584

482 328.3313 482

656 28.54491 656

460 0.94379 460

500 48.79768 500

Complete ProUCL Entry 244

### 209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254 T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC

1870 176.5462 1870

514 70.87004 514

310 53.45655 310

341 52.44994 341

145 30.56671 145

400 75.02088 400

508 10.52103 508

460 65.10559 460

400 72.33252 400

1100 40.86583 1100

4290 86.38619 4290

211.4

130.8

256.8

79

160.4

79

160.4

161

451

50

41

237

34

29

170

393

188

28

33

214

0.8 47.2

0.5 13.76

0.6 244.78

0.8 596.99

0.7 114.75

0.8 412.97

1.3 304.56

1.2 158.44

0.7 315.54

1 443.2

0.6 44.79

0.7 148.94

0.5 51.54

0.8 37.78

0.4 79

Complete ProUCL Entry 245General Background Statistics for Full Data Set s

User Selected Option s

From File WorkSheet_a.wst

Full Precision OFF

Confidence Coefficient 90%

Coverage 90%

Different or Future K Values 1

Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000

Moisture

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 177 Number of Distinct Observation s 144

Number of Missing Value s 40

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 3.9 Minimum 1.361

Maximum 38.5 Maximum 3.651

Second Largest 38.5 Second Largest 3.651

First Quartile 14.3 First Quartile 2.66

Median 18 Median 2.89

Third Quartile 22.91 Third Quartile 3.132

Mean 19.2 Mean 2.884

SD 6.946 SD 0.393

Coefficient of Variation 0.362

Skewness 0.53

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.104 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0622

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0666 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0666

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 29.05 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 31.24

90% UPL (t) 28.16 90% UPL (t) 29.7

90% Percentile (z) 28.1 90% Percentile (z) 29.6

95% Percentile (z) 30.62 95% Percentile (z) 34.15

99% Percentile (z) 35.35 99% Percentile (z) 44.63

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 7.153 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 2.684

MLE of Mean 19.2

MLE of Standard Deviation 7.178

nu sta r 2532

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.739 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.754 90% Percentile 29.21

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0591 95% Percentile 31.97

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0696 99% Percentile 38.12

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 30.34

90% Percentile 28.78 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 30.5

95% Percentile 32.32 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 30.34

99% Percentile 39.7 90% UPL 29.38

Complete UPL Results 24690% Chebyshev UP L 40.09

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 28.78 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 35.83

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 28.96

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 29.99

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 30.23

Ash

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 177 Number of Distinct Observation s 168

Number of Missing Value s 40

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.49 Minimum

‐ 0.713

Maximum 20 Maximum 2.996

Second Largest 16.99 Second Largest 2.833

First Quartile 2.143 First Quartile 0.762

Median 4.227 Median 1.442

Third Quartile 7.201 Third Quartile 1.974

Mean 4.987 Mean 1.237

SD 3.857 SD 0.96

Coefficient of Variation 0.773

Skewness 1.127

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.122 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.109

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0666 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0666

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 10.46 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 13.45

90% UPL (t) 9.963 90% UPL (t) 11.89

90% Percentile (z) 9.93 90% Percentile (z) 11.8

95% Percentile (z) 11.33 95% Percentile (z) 16.72

99% Percentile (z) 13.96 99% Percentile (z) 32.17

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.475 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 3.38

MLE of Mean 4.987

MLE of Standard Deviation 4.106

nu sta r 522.3

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.568 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.771 90% Percentile 9.947

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0845 95% Percentile 13.02

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0709 99% Percentile 16.36

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 10.64

90% Percentile 10.43 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 10.64

95% Percentile 13.06 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 10.64

99% Percentile 19.01 90% UPL 10.02

90% Chebyshev UP L 16.59

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 10.4 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 14.79

Complete UPL Results 24790% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 10.62

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 11.27

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 11.6

Volatile Matter

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 5

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 80.57 Minimum 4.389

Maximum 81.44 Maximum 4.4

Second Largest 81.37 Second Largest 4.399

First Quartile 81.07 First Quartile 4.395

Median 81.24 Median 4.397

Third Quartile 81.31 Third Quartile 4.398

Mean 81.14 Mean 4.396

SD 0.306 SD 0.00377

Coefficient of Variation 0.00377

Skewness

‐ 1.317

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.844 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.844

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.85 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.86

90% UPL (t) 81.61 90% UPL (t) 81.61

90% Percentile (z) 81.53 90% Percentile (z) 81.53

95% Percentile (z) 81.64 95% Percentile (z) 81.65

99% Percentile (z) 81.85 99% Percentile (z) 81.86

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 46893 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00173

MLE of Mean 81.14

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.375

nu sta r 656499

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.858 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 81.4

Complete UPL Results 248K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.351 95% Percentile 81.42

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 81.44

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.44

90% Percentile 81.62 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.44

95% Percentile 81.76 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.44

99% Percentile 82.02 90% UPL 81.44

90% Chebyshev UP L 82.12

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 81.61 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 81.67

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 81.61

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 81.86

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 81.86

Fixed Carbon

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 17.85 Minimum 2.882

Maximum 18.78 Maximum 2.933

Second Largest 18.42 Second Largest 2.913

First Quartile 18.05 First Quartile 2.893

Median 18.13 Median 2.898

Third Quartile 18.33 Third Quartile 2.909

Mean 18.22 Mean 2.902

SD 0.309 SD 0.0169

Coefficient of Variation 0.017

Skewness 0.955

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.939 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.942

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 18.94 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 18.95

90% UPL (t) 18.69 90% UPL (t) 18.69

90% Percentile (z) 18.61 90% Percentile (z) 18.61

95% Percentile (z) 18.72 95% Percentile (z) 18.73

99% Percentile (z) 18.94 99% Percentile (z) 18.94

Complete UPL Results 249Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 2327 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.00783

MLE of Mean 18.22

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.378

nu sta r 32584

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.317 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 18.56

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.218 95% Percentile 18.67

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 18.76

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 18.78

90% Percentile 18.7 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 18.78

95% Percentile 18.84 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 18.78

99% Percentile 19.11 90% UPL 18.78

90% Chebyshev UP L 19.21

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 18.69 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 18.76

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 18.69

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 18.94

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 18.94

Hydrogen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 5

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5.95 Minimum 1.783

Maximum 6.12 Maximum 1.812

Second Largest 6 Second Largest 1.792

First Quartile 5.985 First Quartile 1.789

Median 5.99 Median 1.79

Third Quartile 6 Third Quartile 1.792

Mean 6.004 Mean 1.792

SD 0.0538 SD 0.0089

Coefficient of Variation 0.00896

Skewness 2.051

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Complete UPL Results 250Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.741 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.743

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13

90% UPL (t) 6.087 90% UPL (t) 6.087

90% Percentile (z) 6.073 90% Percentile (z) 6.073

95% Percentile (z) 6.093 95% Percentile (z) 6.093

99% Percentile (z) 6.129 99% Percentile (z) 6.13

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 8374 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 7.17E

‐ 04

MLE of Mean 6.004

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0656

nu sta r 117230

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.209 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6.048

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.57 95% Percentile 6.084

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6.113

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.12

90% Percentile 6.089 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 6.12

95% Percentile 6.113 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 6.048

99% Percentile 6.158 90% UPL 6.12

90% Chebyshev UP L 6.177

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.087 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6.023

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.087

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.13

Carbon

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 7

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 50.2 Minimum 3.916

Maximum 50.72 Maximum 3.926

Second Largest 50.57 Second Largest 3.923

First Quartile 50.49 First Quartile 3.922

Median 50.53 Median 3.923

Third Quartile 50.57 Third Quartile 3.923

Mean 50.51 Mean 3.922

SD 0.157 SD 0.00311

Coefficient of Variation 0.00311

Skewness

‐ 1.183

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Complete UPL Results 251Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.877 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.876

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 50.87 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 50.88

90% UPL (t) 50.75 90% UPL (t) 50.75

90% Percentile (z) 50.71 90% Percentile (z) 50.71

95% Percentile (z) 50.77 95% Percentile (z) 50.77

99% Percentile (z) 50.87 99% Percentile (z) 50.88

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 68974 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 7.32E

‐ 04

MLE of Mean 50.51

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.192

nu sta r 965640

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.862 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 50.63

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.315 95% Percentile 50.68

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 50.71

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 50.72

90% Percentile 50.76 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 50.72

95% Percentile 50.83 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 50.72

99% Percentile 50.96 90% UPL 50.72

90% Chebyshev UP L 51.01

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 50.75 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 50.68

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 50.75

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 50.88

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 50.88

Nitrogen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 47 Number of Distinct Observation s 23

Number of Missing Value s 20

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.08 Minimum

‐ 2.526

Maximum 1.26 Maximum 0.231

Second Largest 0.77 Second Largest

‐ 0.261

First Quartile 0.09 First Quartile

‐ 2.408

Median 0.14 Median

‐ 1.966

Complete UPL Results 252Third Quartile 0.24 Third Quartile

‐ 1.428

Mean 0.239 Mean

‐ 1.771

SD 0.245 SD 0.761

Coefficient of Variation 1.025

Skewness 2.339

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.68 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.848

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.946 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.946

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.621 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.559

90% UPL (t) 0.56 90% UPL (t) 0.463

90% Percentile (z) 0.552 90% Percentile (z) 0.451

95% Percentile (z) 0.641 95% Percentile (z) 0.595

99% Percentile (z) 0.808 99% Percentile (z) 1

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.535 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.155

MLE of Mean 0.239

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.193

nu sta r 144.3

A

‐ D Test Statistic 3.3 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.766 90% Percentile 0.582

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.19 95% Percentile 0.742

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.131 99% Percentile 1.035

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.7

90% Percentile 0.495 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.724

95% Percentile 0.617 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.7

99% Percentile 0.893 90% UPL 0.644

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.98

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.489 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.465

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.481

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.568

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.564

Oxygen

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 6

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 42.36 Minimum 3.746

Maximum 43.08 Maximum 3.763

Second Largest 42.6 Second Largest 3.752

First Quartile 42.49 First Quartile 3.749

Median 42.57 Median 3.751

Third Quartile 42.59 Third Quartile 3.752

Mean 42.6 Mean 3.752

SD 0.233 SD 0.00546

Complete UPL Results 253Coefficient of Variation 0.00547

Skewness 1.731

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Warning: There are only 7 Values in this data

Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set

,

the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusion s

The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10

‐ 15 observations

.

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.79 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.792

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14

90% UPL (t) 42.95 90% UPL (t) 42.95

90% Percentile (z) 42.89 90% Percentile (z) 42.89

95% Percentile (z) 42.98 95% Percentile (z) 42.98

99% Percentile (z) 43.14 99% Percentile (z) 43.14

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 22351 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.00191

MLE of Mean 42.6

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.285

nu sta r 312910

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.281 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 42.79

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.523 95% Percentile 42.94

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 43.05

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 43.08

90% Percentile 42.96 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 43.08

95% Percentile 43.07 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 43.08

99% Percentile 43.26 90% UPL 43.08

90% Chebyshev UP L 43.34

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 42.95 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 42.74

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 42.95

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 43.14

Sulfu r

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 186 Number of Distinct Observation s 160

Complete UPL Results 254Number of Missing Value s 31

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.009 Minimum

‐ 4.711

Maximum 0.731 Maximum

‐ 0.313

Second Largest 0.625 Second Largest

‐ 0.47

First Quartile 0.0484 First Quartile

‐ 3.029

Median 0.107 Median

‐ 2.238

Third Quartile 0.17 Third Quartile

‐ 1.772

Mean 0.128 Mean

‐ 2.379

SD 0.113 SD 0.829

Coefficient of Variation 0.887

Skewness 2.652

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.18 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0934

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.065 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.065

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.288 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.299

90% UPL (t) 0.274 90% UPL (t) 0.27

90% Percentile (z) 0.273 90% Percentile (z) 0.268

95% Percentile (z) 0.314 95% Percentile (z) 0.362

99% Percentile (z) 0.391 99% Percentile (z) 0.638

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.687 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0756

MLE of Mean 0.128

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0982

nu sta r 627.6

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.047 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.769 90% Percentile 0.199

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.094 95% Percentile 0.282

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0684 99% Percentile 0.612

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.216

90% Percentile 0.258 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.216

95% Percentile 0.32 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.22

99% Percentile 0.457 90% UPL 0.202

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.468

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.255 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.352

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.257

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.275

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.278

Heating Value

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 187 Number of Distinct Observation s 186

Number of Missing Value s 30

Complete UPL Results 255Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5468 Minimum 8.607

Maximum 11699 Maximum 9.367

Second Largest 10670 Second Largest 9.275

First Quartile 7600 First Quartile 8.936

Median 8241 Median 9.017

Third Quartile 8600 Third Quartile 9.06

Mean 8091 Mean 8.993

SD 864.2 SD 0.11

Coefficient of Variation 0.107

Skewness

‐ 0.146

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.109 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.131

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0648 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0648

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9313 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9396

90% UPL (t) 9205 90% UPL (t) 9269

90% Percentile (z) 9199 90% Percentile (z) 9260

95% Percentile (z) 9513 95% Percentile (z) 9638

99% Percentile (z) 10102 99% Percentile (z) 10387

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 83.9 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 96.44

MLE of Mean 8091

MLE of Standard Deviation 883.3

nu sta r 31378

A

‐ D Test Statistic 3.327 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.75 90% Percentile 9113

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.124 95% Percentile 9232

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0668 99% Percentile 9543

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 9207

90% Percentile 9242 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 9205

95% Percentile 9597 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 9207

99% Percentile 10287 90% UPL 9167

90% Chebyshev UP L 10691

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 9243 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 10100

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 9249

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9363

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 9371

Antimony

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 22 Number of Distinct Observation s 18

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.17 Minimum

‐ 1.772

Complete UPL Results 256Maximum 16.6 Maximum 2.809

Second Largest 7.4 Second Largest 2.001

First Quartile 0.47 First Quartile

‐ 0.765

Median 2 Median 0.693

Third Quartile 2.775 Third Quartile 1.017

Mean 2.6 Mean 0.318

SD 3.56 SD 1.197

Coefficient of Variation 1.369

Skewness 3.216

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.611 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.946

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 8.784 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 10.99

90% UPL (t) 7.416 90% UPL (t) 6.942

90% Percentile (z) 7.162 90% Percentile (z) 6.374

95% Percentile (z) 8.456 95% Percentile (z) 9.846

99% Percentile (z) 10.88 99% Percentile (z) 22.26

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.821 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 3.168

MLE of Mean 2.6

MLE of Standard Deviation 2.87

nu sta r 36.12

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.669 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.775 90% Percentile 4.14

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.138 95% Percentile 7.24

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.191 99% Percentile 14.67

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.4

90% Percentile 6.283 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 7.4

95% Percentile 8.357 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 7.4

99% Percentile 13.24 90% UPL 6.44

90% Chebyshev UP L 13.52

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.294 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6.233

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.323

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8.37

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 8.656

Arsenic

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 236 Number of Distinct Observation s 217

Number of Missing Value s 16

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.104 Minimum

‐ 2.263

Maximum 220 Maximum 5.394

Second Largest 210 Second Largest 5.347

Complete UPL Results 257First Quartile 4.015 First Quartile 1.39

Median 11.1 Median 2.407

Third Quartile 28.08 Third Quartile 3.335

Mean 26.12 Mean 2.379

SD 39.55 SD 1.418

Coefficient of Variation 1.514

Skewness 2.787

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.255 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0343

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0577 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0577

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 81.45 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 78.51

90% UPL (t) 77.06 90% UPL (t) 67.06

90% Percentile (z) 76.81 90% Percentile (z) 66.46

95% Percentile (z) 91.18 95% Percentile (z) 111.3

99% Percentile (z) 118.1 99% Percentile (z) 292.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.68 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 38.42

MLE of Mean 26.12

MLE of Standard Deviation 31.68

nu sta r 320.9

A

‐ D Test Statistic 4.4 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.803 90% Percentile 65.35

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.112 95% Percentile 110

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0622 99% Percentile 199.5

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 82.12

90% Percentile 66.02 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 81.06

95% Percentile 89.85 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 82.12

99% Percentile 146.9 90% UPL 65.79

90% Chebyshev UP L 145

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 61.32 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 64.17

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 60.87

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 67.49

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 67.66

Beryllium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 22 Number of Distinct Observation s 10

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.008 Minimum

‐ 4.828

Maximum 0.2 Maximum

‐ 1.609

Second Largest 0.2 Second Largest

‐ 1.609

First Quartile 0.008 First Quartile

‐ 4.828

Median 0.06 Median

‐ 2.827

Complete UPL Results 258Third Quartile 0.17 Third Quartile

‐ 1.772

Mean 0.088 Mean

‐ 3.093

SD 0.0799 SD 1.351

Coefficient of Variation 0.908

Skewness 0.417

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.814 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.82

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.227 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.474

90% UPL (t) 0.196 90% UPL (t) 0.282

90% Percentile (z) 0.19 90% Percentile (z) 0.256

95% Percentile (z) 0.219 95% Percentile (z) 0.419

99% Percentile (z) 0.274 99% Percentile (z) 1.052

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.794 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.111

MLE of Mean 0.088

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.0988

nu sta r 34.93

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.281 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.776 90% Percentile 0.2

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.21 95% Percentile 0.2

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.192 99% Percentile 0.2

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2

90% Percentile 0.214 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2

95% Percentile 0.286 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2

99% Percentile 0.456 90% UPL 0.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.333

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.223 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.413

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.232

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.298

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.322

Cadmium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 125 Number of Distinct Observation s 91

Number of Missing Value s 30

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 1.12E

‐ 06 Minimum

‐ 13.7

Maximum 1.773 Maximum 0.573

Second Largest 1.074 Second Largest 0.0717

First Quartile 0.0985 First Quartile

‐ 2.318

Median 0.236 Median

‐ 1.446

Third Quartile 0.39 Third Quartile

‐ 0.942

Mean 0.27 Mean

‐ 1.76

Complete UPL Results 259SD 0.233 SD 1.437

Coefficient of Variation 0.864

Skewness 2.801

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.195 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.193

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0792 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0792

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.606 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.373

90% UPL (t) 0.571 90% UPL (t) 1.103

90% Percentile (z) 0.568 90% Percentile (z) 1.084

95% Percentile (z) 0.653 95% Percentile (z) 1.828

99% Percentile (z) 0.811 99% Percentile (z) 4.865

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.23 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.219

MLE of Mean 0.27

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.243

nu sta r 307.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.284 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.777 90% Percentile 0.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.133 95% Percentile 0.526

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.085 99% Percentile 1.033

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.489

90% Percentile 0.59 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.489

95% Percentile 0.751 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.4

99% Percentile 1.12 90% UPL 0.401

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.971

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.571 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.827

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.595

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.63

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.663

Chromium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 231 Number of Distinct Observation s 211

Number of Missing Value s 21

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.204 Minimum

‐ 1.589

Maximum 311 Maximum 5.74

Second Largest 240 Second Largest 5.481

First Quartile 8.945 First Quartile 2.191

Median 19 Median 2.944

Third Quartile 49.8 Third Quartile 3.908

Mean 39.01 Mean 2.977

SD 49.86 SD 1.264

Coefficient of Variation 1.278

Complete UPL Results 260Skewness 2.503

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.218 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0341

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0583 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0583

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 108.8 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 115.2

90% UPL (t) 103.2 90% UPL (t) 99.97

90% Percentile (z) 102.9 90% Percentile (z) 99.15

95% Percentile (z) 121 95% Percentile (z) 157

99% Percentile (z) 155 99% Percentile (z) 371.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.848 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 46.02

MLE of Mean 39.01

MLE of Standard Deviation 42.37

nu sta r 391.6

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.509 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.791 90% Percentile 99

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0947 95% Percentile 146

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0622 99% Percentile 227.7

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 120

90% Percentile 93.54 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 120

95% Percentile 124 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 120

99% Percentile 195.4 90% UPL 99.8

90% Chebyshev UP L 188.9

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 89.39 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 111.1

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 89.69

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 97.68

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 98.87

Cobalt

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 22 Number of Distinct Observation s 18

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.38 Minimum

‐ 0.968

Maximum 1.63 Maximum 0.489

Second Largest 1.58 Second Largest 0.457

First Quartile 0.633 First Quartile

‐ 0.459

Median 0.785 Median

‐ 0.242

Third Quartile 1.3 Third Quartile 0.261

Mean 0.903 Mean

‐ 0.202

SD 0.408 SD 0.462

Coefficient of Variation 0.452

Skewness 0.558

Complete UPL Results 261Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.886 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.923

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.612 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.824

90% UPL (t) 1.455 90% UPL (t) 1.527

90% Percentile (z) 1.426 90% Percentile (z) 1.478

95% Percentile (z) 1.574 95% Percentile (z) 1.748

99% Percentile (z) 1.852 99% Percentile (z) 2.396

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 4.5 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.201

MLE of Mean 0.903

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.426

nu sta r 198

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.749 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.746 90% Percentile 1.513

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.198 95% Percentile 1.577

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.186 99% Percentile 1.62

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.58

90% Percentile 1.473 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.58

95% Percentile 1.697 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.58

99% Percentile 2.173 90% UPL 1.562

90% Chebyshev UP L 2.155

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.489 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2.301

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.496

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.718

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.739

Lead

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 251 Number of Distinct Observation s 224

Number of Missing Value s 1

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.383 Minimum

‐ 0.96

Maximum 451 Maximum 6.111

Second Largest 393 Second Largest 5.974

First Quartile 8.306 First Quartile 2.117

Median 18.37 Median 2.911

Third Quartile 37.41 Third Quartile 3.622

Mean 44.01 Mean 2.937

SD 69.95 SD 1.319

Coefficient of Variation 1.59

Skewness 2.983

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Complete UPL Results 262Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.292 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0544

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0559 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0559

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 141.6 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 118.8

90% UPL (t) 134.1 90% UPL (t) 103.1

90% Percentile (z) 133.7 90% Percentile (z) 102.3

95% Percentile (z) 159.1 95% Percentile (z) 165.1

99% Percentile (z) 206.7 99% Percentile (z) 405.6

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.706 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 62.33

MLE of Mean 44.01

MLE of Standard Deviation 52.37

nu sta r 354.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 7.939 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.8 90% Percentile 132.8

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.147 95% Percentile 212

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0602 99% Percentile 335.5

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 150

90% Percentile 110.2 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 150

95% Percentile 149.3 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 150

99% Percentile 242.6 90% UPL 135

90% Chebyshev UP L 254.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 101.6 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 81.07

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 99.68

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 111.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 110.2

Manganese

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 22 Number of Distinct Observation s 22

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 31 Minimum 3.434

Maximum 156 Maximum 5.05

Second Largest 127 Second Largest 4.844

First Quartile 44.83 First Quartile 3.802

Median 60.3 Median 4.099

Third Quartile 76.98 Third Quartile 4.343

Mean 65.89 Mean 4.109

SD 29.5 SD 0.393

Coefficient of Variation 0.448

Skewness 1.726

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.841 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.964

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911

Complete UPL Results 263Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 117.1 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 120.5

90% UPL (t) 105.8 90% UPL (t) 103.6

90% Percentile (z) 103.7 90% Percentile (z) 100.8

95% Percentile (z) 114.4 95% Percentile (z) 116.2

99% Percentile (z) 134.5 99% Percentile (z) 152

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 5.65 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 11.66

MLE of Mean 65.89

MLE of Standard Deviation 27.72

nu sta r 248.6

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.444 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.746 90% Percentile 89.45

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.125 95% Percentile 125.2

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.186 99% Percentile 149.9

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 127

90% Percentile 103 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 127

95% Percentile 117.1 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 127

99% Percentile 146.8 90% UPL 116.1

90% Chebyshev UP L 156.4

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 103.7 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 125.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 103.6

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 118

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 118.5

Mercury

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 153 Number of Distinct Observation s 72

Number of Missing Value s 99

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.005 Minimum

‐ 5.298

Maximum 0.58 Maximum

‐ 0.545

Second Largest 0.35 Second Largest

‐ 1.05

First Quartile 0.051 First Quartile

‐ 2.976

Median 0.08 Median

‐ 2.526

Third Quartile 0.08 Third Quartile

‐ 2.526

Mean 0.0911 Mean

‐ 2.704

SD 0.0761 SD 0.868

Coefficient of Variation 0.836

Skewness 2.773

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.309 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.207

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0716 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0716

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Complete UPL Results 264Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.2 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.231

90% UPL (t) 0.189 90% UPL (t) 0.205

90% Percentile (z) 0.189 90% Percentile (z) 0.203

95% Percentile (z) 0.216 95% Percentile (z) 0.279

99% Percentile (z) 0.268 99% Percentile (z) 0.504

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.742 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0523

MLE of Mean 0.0911

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.069

nu sta r 533

A

‐ D Test Statistic 5.81 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.768 90% Percentile 0.168

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.217 95% Percentile 0.248

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.077 99% Percentile 0.328

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 0.22

90% Percentile 0.183 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.22

95% Percentile 0.226 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 0.22

99% Percentile 0.321 90% UPL 0.182

90% Chebyshev UP L 0.32

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 0.181 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 0.124

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 0.184

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.196

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 0.201

Nickel

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 22 Number of Distinct Observation s 19

Number of Missing Value s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.98 Minimum

‐ 0.0202

Maximum 12.2 Maximum 2.501

Second Largest 5.05 Second Largest 1.619

First Quartile 1.095 First Quartile 0.0893

Median 1.755 Median 0.535

Third Quartile 2.718 Third Quartile 1

Mean 2.47 Mean 0.649

SD 2.439 SD 0.658

Coefficient of Variation 0.987

Skewness 3.307

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.595 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.871

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.911

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.706 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 6.001

Complete UPL Results 26590% UPL (t) 5.77 90% UPL (t) 4.661

90% Percentile (z) 5.596 90% Percentile (z) 4.447

95% Percentile (z) 6.482 95% Percentile (z) 5.648

99% Percentile (z) 8.143 99% Percentile (z) 8.845

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.85 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 1.335

MLE of Mean 2.47

MLE of Standard Deviation 1.816

nu sta r 81.4

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.278 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.755 90% Percentile 4.055

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.211 95% Percentile 5.007

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.188 99% Percentile 10.7

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 5.05

90% Percentile 4.894 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 5.05

95% Percentile 6.007 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 5.05

99% Percentile 8.488 90% UPL 4.789

90% Chebyshev UP L 9.951

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 4.9 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 5.151

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 4.826

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 6.024

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 5.991

Selenium

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 30 Number of Distinct Observation s 14

Number of Missing Value s 222

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.27 Minimum

‐ 1.309

Maximum 1.3 Maximum 0.262

Second Largest 1.2 Second Largest 0.182

First Quartile 0.425 First Quartile

‐ 0.861

Median 0.65 Median

‐ 0.434

Third Quartile 0.8 Third Quartile

‐ 0.223

Mean 0.65 Mean

‐ 0.535

SD 0.283 SD 0.486

Coefficient of Variation 0.436

Skewness 0.329

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.931 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.894

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.927

Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.12 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.31

90% UPL (t) 1.028 90% UPL (t) 1.119

90% Percentile (z) 1.014 90% Percentile (z) 1.092

Complete UPL Results 26695% Percentile (z) 1.116 95% Percentile (z) 1.303

99% Percentile (z) 1.31 99% Percentile (z) 1.814

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 4.467 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 0.146

MLE of Mean 0.65

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.308

nu sta r 268

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.908 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.747 90% Percentile 1

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.157 95% Percentile 1.11

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.16 99% Percentile 1.271

Data follow Appx. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1.2

90% Percentile 1.063 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.2

95% Percentile 1.225 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1.02

99% Percentile 1.57 90% UPL 1

90% Chebyshev UP L 1.515

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1.072 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1.363

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1.082

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.212

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 1.232

Formaldehyde

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 17 Number of Distinct Observation s 15

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 9300 Minimum 9.138

Maximum 130000 Maximum 11.78

Second Largest 110000 Second Largest 11.61

First Quartile 18000 First Quartile 9.798

Median 44000 Median 10.69

Third Quartile 60000 Third Quartile 11

Mean 48841 Mean 10.54

SD 36196 SD 0.761

Coefficient of Variation 0.741

Skewness 1.171

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.854 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.96

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.892 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.892

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 114682 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 150556

90% UPL (t) 98630 90% UPL (t) 107423

90% Percentile (z) 95228 90% Percentile (z) 100008

95% Percentile (z) 108379 95% Percentile (z) 131865

99% Percentile (z) 133046 99% Percentile (z) 221518

Complete UPL Results 267Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.755 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Theta Star 27829

MLE of Mean 48841

MLE of Standard Deviation 36868

nu sta r 59.67

A

‐ D Test Statistic 0.371 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.749 90% Percentile 110000

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.133 95% Percentile 114000

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.212 99% Percentile 126800

Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 110000

90% Percentile 97983 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 118000

95% Percentile 120806 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 110000

99% Percentile 171832 90% UPL 114000

90% Chebyshev UP L 160578

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 100629 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 123000

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 101728

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 127788

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 131635

Bromide

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 7 Number of Distinct Observation s 2

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 6 Minimum 1.792

Maximum 7 Maximum 1.946

Second Largest 6 Second Largest 1.792

First Quartile 6 First Quartile 1.792

Median 6 Median 1.792

Third Quartile 6 Third Quartile 1.792

Mean 6.143 Mean 1.814

SD 0.378 SD 0.0583

Coefficient of Variation 0.0615

Skewness 2.646

Warning: There are only 2 Distinct Values in this dat a

There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods

.

Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output display!

It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.

However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable

.

It is recommended to have 10

‐ 15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results

.

Warning: A sample size of 'n'

= 7 may not adequate enough to compute meaningful and reliable test statistics and estimates !

It is suggested to collect at least 8 to 10 observations using these statistical methods !

If possible compute and collect Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based sample size and analytical results

.

Background Statistics

Complete UPL Results 268Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.453 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.453

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.803

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.025 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7.027

90% UPL (t) 6.725 90% UPL (t) 6.709

90% Percentile (z) 6.627 90% Percentile (z) 6.609

95% Percentile (z) 6.765 95% Percentile (z) 6.75

99% Percentile (z) 7.022 99% Percentile (z) 7.024

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 189.5 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 0.0324

MLE of Mean 6.143

MLE of Standard Deviation 0.446

nu sta r 2653

A

‐ D Test Statistic 2.109 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.708 90% Percentile 6.4

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.516 95% Percentile 6.7

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.311 99% Percentile 6.94

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 7

90% Percentile 6.721 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

95% Percentile 6.895 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage N/A

99% Percentile 7.228 90% UPL 7

90% Chebyshev UP L 7.355

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 6.714 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 6

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 6.713

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.026

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 7.026

Chloride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 175 Number of Distinct Observation s 85

Number of Missing Value s 42

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 46.6 Minimum 3.842

Maximum 9940 Maximum 9.204

Second Largest 6460 Second Largest 8.773

First Quartile 504 First Quartile 6.223

Median 800 Median 6.685

Third Quartile 1100 Third Quartile 7.003

Mean 933.2 Mean 6.461

SD 989.5 SD 0.965

Coefficient of Variation 1.06

Skewness 5.615

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.202 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.188

Complete UPL Results 269Lilliefors Critical Value 0.067 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.067

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2337 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2515

90% UPL (t) 2210 90% UPL (t) 2221

90% Percentile (z) 2201 90% Percentile (z) 2203

95% Percentile (z) 2561 95% Percentile (z) 3127

99% Percentile (z) 3235 99% Percentile (z) 6034

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.448 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 644.3

MLE of Mean 933.2

MLE of Standard Deviation 775.4

nu sta r 507

A

‐ D Test Statistic 3.777 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.772 90% Percentile 1600

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.131 95% Percentile 1918

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0715 99% Percentile 4854

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1800

90% Percentile 1961 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1800

95% Percentile 2460 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1600

99% Percentile 3587 90% UPL 1640

90% Chebyshev UP L 3910

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1924 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 1994

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 1955

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2086

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2136

Fluoride

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 49 Number of Distinct Observation s 44

Number of Missing Value s 109

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 5 Minimum 1.609

Maximum 658.8 Maximum 6.49

Second Largest 418.1 Second Largest 6.036

First Quartile 14.1 First Quartile 2.646

Median 23.2 Median 3.144

Third Quartile 37 Third Quartile 3.611

Mean 64.58 Mean 3.346

SD 124.6 SD 1.084

Coefficient of Variation 1.93

Skewness 3.381

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.483 Shapiro Wilk Test Statisti c 0.867

Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.947 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.947

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Complete UPL Results 270Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 258.4 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 153.3

90% UPL (t) 228.2 90% UPL (t) 117.8

90% Percentile (z) 224.3 90% Percentile (z) 113.9

95% Percentile (z) 269.6 95% Percentile (z) 168.9

99% Percentile (z) 354.5 99% Percentile (z) 353.6

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 0.7 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 92.26

MLE of Mean 64.58

MLE of Standard Deviation 77.19

nu sta r 68.59

A

‐ D Test Statistic 5.573 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.794 90% Percentile 167.1

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.302 95% Percentile 346.1

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.132 99% Percentile 543.3

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 256.2

90% Percentile 162.1 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 286.1

95% Percentile 219.8 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 286.1

99% Percentile 357.6 90% UPL 212.8

90% Chebyshev UP L 442.3

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 146.6 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 71.35

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 138.1

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 179.4

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 171.2

Total Metals

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 251 Number of Distinct Observation s 248

Number of Missing Value s 1

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 0.944 Minimum

‐ 0.0579

Maximum 597 Maximum 6.392

Second Largest 466.4 Second Largest 6.145

First Quartile 32.68 First Quartile 3.487

Median 79 Median 4.369

Third Quartile 153.7 Third Quartile 5.034

Mean 111 Mean 4.211

SD 111.5 SD 1.084

Coefficient of Variation 1.004

Skewness 1.742

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.174 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0641

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0559 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0559

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

Complete UPL Results 27190% UTL with 90% Coverage 266.6 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 306

90% UPL (t) 254.6 90% UPL (t) 272.2

90% Percentile (z) 253.9 90% Percentile (z) 270.5

95% Percentile (z) 294.4 95% Percentile (z) 401

99% Percentile (z) 370.4 99% Percentile (z) 839.5

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.129 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 98.36

MLE of Mean 111

MLE of Standard Deviation 104.5

nu sta r 566.7

A

‐ D Test Statistic 1.24 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.781 90% Percentile 266.1

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.0652 95% Percentile 371.6

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0593 99% Percentile 461.5

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 308.5

90% Percentile 248.1 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 314.5

95% Percentile 318.8 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 308.5

99% Percentile 481.4 90% UPL 278.2

90% Chebyshev UP L 446.1

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 242.9 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 335.2

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 245.7

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 262

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 267

Total Halogens

General Statistic s

Total Number of Observations 184 Number of Distinct Observation s 104

Number of Missing Value s 33

Raw Statistics Log

‐ Transformed Statistics

Minimum 13.3 Minimum 2.588

Maximum 9940 Maximum 9.204

Second Largest 6460 Second Largest 8.773

First Quartile 400 First Quartile 5.991

Median 800 Median 6.685

Third Quartile 1100 Third Quartile 7.003

Mean 898.5 Mean 6.314

SD 987.4 SD 1.187

Coefficient of Variation 1.099

Skewness 5.447

Background Statistics

Normal Distribution Tes t Lognormal Distribution Test

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.188 Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.204

Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0653 Lilliefors Critical Value 0.0653

Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution

90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2296 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 2962

90% UPL (t) 2172 90% UPL (t) 2551

Complete UPL Results 27290% Percentile (z) 2164 90% Percentile (z) 2527

95% Percentile (z) 2523 95% Percentile (z) 3889

99% Percentile (z) 3195 99% Percentile (z) 8733

Gamma Distribution Tes t Data Distribution Tes t

k star 1.149 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)

Theta Star 781.7

MLE of Mean 898.5

MLE of Standard Deviation 838

nu sta r 423

A

‐ D Test Statistic 3.941 Nonparametric Statistics

5% A

‐ D Critical Value 0.78 90% Percentile 1600

K

‐ S Test Statistic 0.14 95% Percentile 1985

5% K

‐ S Critical Value 0.0695 99% Percentile 4659

Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level

Assuming Gamma Distribution 90% UTL with 90% Coverage 1700

90% Percentile 1999 90% Percentile Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1770

95% Percentile 2563 90% BCA Bootstrap UTL with 90% Coverage 1700

99% Percentile 3861 90% UPL 1600

90% Chebyshev UP L 3869

90% WH Approx. Gamma UPL 1957 Upper Threshold Limit Based upon IQ R 2150

90% HW Approx. Gamma UPL 2020

90% WH Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2133

90% HW Approx. Gamma UTL with 90% Coverage 2222

Complete UPL Results 273

### 137.48

260.48

370.48

143.49

85.48

32.97

174.47

388.23

459.98

23.5

349.48

140.7

106.36

462.48

55.48

466.42

460.47

327.47

159.47

423.47

186.08

188.08

228.08

104.08

109.08

39.08

114.08

87.08

266.08

86.08

103.08

111.08

103.68

159.88

81.08

201.08

178.08

107.78

89.08

172.08

372.68

52.07

303.74

308.48

240.47

49.46

142.49

Sheet1 274

### 125.18

314.48

8.01

322.08

48.48

242.58

97.58

442.08

31.48

56.08

9.08

18.92

13.88

Sheet1 275