alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                   0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                    0<F1>
<COMMON>                                       0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     0<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0<F1>
<SALES>                                        0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0<F2>
<CGS>                                          0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0<F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0<F2>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0<F2>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0<F2>
<CHANGES>                                      0<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                   0<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0<F2>


<FN>
<F1> See December 31, 1997 Statement of Net Assets in Liquidation
<F2> See December 31, 1997 Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
</FN>


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1811

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional aggravating

factor for death penalty cases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1995

Mr. MARTINI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an

additional aggravating factor for death penalty cases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Penalty Clari5 fication Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL AGGRAVATING FACTOR FOR DEATH

7 PENALTY.

8 Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding after paragraph (15) the following:
2

•HR 1811 IH

1 ‘‘(16) MULTIPLE KILLINGS OR ATTEMPTED

2 KILLINGS.—The defendant intentionally kills or at3 tempts to kill more than one person in a single

4 criminal episode.’’.

Æ
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 2/03/15

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: 2/02/15 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

with EDF

SUMMARY

On February 2, 2015 I met by telephone with Vicki Patton, Sean Donahue, and Tomas 

Carbonell of the Environmental Defense Fund to discuss legal issues concerning the Clean 

Power Plan proposal for Existing Power Plants.
#### § 6.04 Vessels requisitioned by the United States for emergency evacuation.

Pursuant to the request of the Acting Secretary of Defense, dated November 21, 1951, made under the provisions of section 1 of Public Law 891, 81st Congress, approved December 27, 1950, compliance with the provisions of the navigation and vessel inspection laws administered by the United States Coast Guard is hereby waived, as well as the regulations issued thereunder and published in 33 CFR chapter I or in this chapter, to the extent necessary to permit the operation of vessels which might be requisitioned by the United States for the purpose of emergency evacuation.

[CGFR 51-61, 16 FR 12792, Dec. 20, 1951. Redesignated by CGFR 69-123, 34 FR 19076, Dec. 2, 1969]
# C_2016048EN.01003401.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission

(Case T-40/11) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European airfreight market - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) - Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 048/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Latam Airlines Group SA, formerly Lan Airlines SA (Santiago, Chile); and Lan Cargo SA (Santiago) (represented by: B. Hartnett, Barrister, and O. Geiss, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Noë, N. von Lingen and G. Koleva, and subsequently by G. Koleva and A. Dawes, acting as Agents, and by G. Peretz, Barrister)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and M. Simm, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns the applicants, and, in the alternative, for the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns Latam Airlines Group SA, formerly Lan Airlines SA, and Lan Cargo SA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns Latam Airlines Group SA, formerly Lan Airlines SA, and Lan Cargo SA;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q


Amendment #1





QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008





Commission File Number: 000-17064





Oasis Online Technologies Corp.


(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)





Minnesota

41-1430130(State of other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)4710 E Falcon Drive Suite 213 Mesa, Arizona 85215(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)





(480) 634-5840(Issuer's telephone number)





Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  X  No___





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large accelerated filer  [   ]
Accelerated filer    [    ]
Non-accelerated filer    [   ]

(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company    [X]





Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes  ___  No X





As of September 30, 2008, the Registrant had 13,471,208 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding.













EXPLANATORY NOTE





The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”), is solely to correct the indication that the registrant is a shell company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which was indicted in the original filing in error.  No other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q.  This Amendment No.1 continues to speak as of the original filing date and does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date, and does not modify or update in any way disclosures made in the original Form 10-Q filing.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Eric ClickBy:
Eric ClickIts:
Director

Secretary

Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Operating Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 22, 2012

|Filer                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION | CIC           | Notice by James Richard Smail and J.R. Smail, Inc., both of Wooster, Ohio, to acquire 10% or more of the shares and thereby control National Bancshares Corporation, Orrville, Ohio | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/30/2012
|Newspaper:                      | Not available
|Federal Register:               | 09/30/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location     | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|STATE B&TC, DEFIANCE, OHIO | 614313 | 06/04/2012 | 08/31/2012     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending October 13, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANCTENN CORP.                | * 3A5          | BancTenn Corp., Kingsport Tennessee, to merge with Carter County Bancorp, Inc., and thereby acquire its subsidiary, Carter County Bank, both of Elizabethton, Tennessee.                                                                            | Newspaper:10/25/2012Federal Register:11/05/2012       
|Newspaper:                    | 10/25/2012    
|Federal Register:             | 11/05/2012    
|REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 4c8            | Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama, to establish Regions Securities LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, and thereby engage in certain insitutional broker-dealer activities, pursuant to sections 4(k) and 4(j) of the Bank Holding Company Act. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | Not applicable
|Federal Register:             | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending June 18, 2011

|Filer                  | Filing Type     | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------- | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CUSTOMERS BANCORP, INC | * 3A5* 18C* 3A1 | Customers Bancorp, Inc., Phoenixville, PA, to become a bank holding company through the reorganization of Customers Bank, Phoenixville, PA, resulting from the merger of New Century Interim Bank, Phoenixville, PA, with and into Customers Bank.  Subsequently, Berkshire Bancorp, Wyomissing, PA, will merge with and into Customers Bancorp, Inc., and Berkshire Bank, Wyomissing, PA, will merge with and into Customers Bank, Phoenixville, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/08/2011
|Newspaper:             | Not available  
|Federal Register:      | 07/08/2011     

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending December 24, 2011

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. | 4c8* 3A1      | First Financial Holdings, Inc., Charleston, South Carolina, to become a bank holding company upon the conversion of First Federal Savings and Loan Association, Charleston, South Carolina, to a state chartered commercial bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | Not available
|SOUTH STREET FINANCIAL CORP.  | CIC           | Mr. Mark W. Jaindl, Allentown, Pennsylvania, to control up to 17% of the voting shares of South Street Financial Corp., Albemarle, North Carolina.                                                                                | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### NATIONAL ELECTRIC SIGNALING CO. v. TELEFUNKEN WIRELESS TELEGRAPH CO. et al.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

December 5, 1911.)

Patents (§ 328*) — Validity and Infringement — Wireless Telegraph System.

The Fessenden patent, No. 706,736, for a system of transmission of energy by electromagnetic waves, having in the receiving system a closed circuit tuned to the frequency of the transmitted impulses and a current operated wave-responsive device or detector, *held*not anticipated and infringed on a motion for a preliminary injunction.

*425In Equity. Suit by the National Electric Signaling Company against the Telefunken Wireless Telegraph Company and others for infringement of letters patent No-. 706,736 for a system of transmission of energy by electromagnetic waves, granted to Reginald A. Eessenden August 12, 1902. On motion for preliminary injunction.

Motion granted.

Herbert G. Ogden, for complainant.

Hector T. Fenton, for defendants.

*

For other oases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I do not understand that it is disputed that defendant has operated a wireless telegraph station in this city, in which it has used its own devices including the so-called “detector,” of which a sample or replica has been submitted. The individual defendants have appeared generally in the suit.

_ The record does not disclose any prior patents or publications or other material evidence which was not before the court in the Maine suit. National Electric Signaling Co. v. United Wireless Telegraph Co. (C. C.) 189 Fed. 727. The file-wrapper and contents of which so much has been said upon this motion was certainly in evidence there, and was discussed at length in the brief filed at final hearing; the points made being substantially those now relied upon.

Even with the assistance afforded by defendant’s affidavits and brief, I am unable to discover any substantial difference between the defendant’s detector and the “crystal detector” of the Maine suit. Indeed, the argument here is mainly directed to showing that Judge Hale erred in holding that the crystal detector infringed.

Motion for preliminary injunction is granted as prayed.