alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37815-37816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3362]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee (GGAC) will be held on 
September 19-20, 2007, in Room 930 at the VA Central Office, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. On September 19 the session will 
be from 8:30 a.m. and until 5 p.m., and on September 20 from 8 a.m. and 
until 12 noon. This meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters 
pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology by assessing the capability of 
VA health care facilities and programs to meet the medical, 
psychological and functional needs of older veterans and by evaluating 
VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical 
Centers (GRECCs).
    The meeting will feature presentations and discussion on VA's aging 
research activities, update on VA's geriatric workforce (to include 
training, recruitment and retention approaches), VHA Primary Care and 
Geriatric Primary Care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and 
delirium, and performance oversight of the VA Geriatric Research, 
Education, and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties can provide written 
comments for review by the Committee not less than ten days in advance 
of the meeting to Mrs. Marcia Holt-Delaney, Office of Geriatrics and

[[Page 37816]]

Extended Care (114), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Individuals who wish to attend the 
meeting should contact Mrs. Holt-Delaney, Program Analyst, at (202) 
273-8540, at least seven days in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: July 6, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3362 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```
#### State *v.*Sherburne.

On an indictment for resisting a sheriff, unnecessarily described as “legally appointed and duly qualified,” his legal appointment and due qualifications must be proved.

Indictment, for resisting and obstructing Edwin Judkins, sheriff of the county, in the service of a criminal process. The indictment alleged that he was “ legally appointed and duly qualified to discharge the duties of his said office.” The proof was, that he was acting sheriff of the county. The respondent moved to be discharged because the allegation was not proved. The motion was denied, and he excepted. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

*Mugridge*and *A. F. L.*Norris, for the respondent.

*Greene,*solicitor, for the state.

Smith, J.

The averment, that the respondent resisted and obstructed a sheriff legally appointed and duly qualified to discharge the duties of his office, is descriptive of matter material to be charged, and cannot be rejected as surplusage, but must be proved as charged. *State*v. *Copp,*15 N. H. 212; *State*v. *Langley,*34 N. H. 529. If the words “ legally appointed and duly qualified to discharge the duties of his said office ” had been omitted, the indictment would have been sufficient. *State*v. *Copp,*15 N. B. 212, 216. Where there is unnecessary particularity in the description of whatever is necessary to be mentioned, all the particulars of the description must be proved, because they are made essential to the identity. A familiar example given in the text-books is that of an indictment for stealing a *blaclc*horse. The animal is necessarily mentioned, but the color need not be stated: yet if stated, it is made descriptive of the particular animal stolen, and a variance in the proof of the color is fatal. 1 Gr. Ev., *s.*65; 1 Stark. Ev. 374. But where the time, place, person, or other circumstances are not descriptive of the fact or degree of the crime, nor material to the jurisdiction, a discrepancy between the allegation and the proof is not a variance. 1 Gr. Ev., *s.*65. The gist of this offence was resisting and obstructing an officer, and it was material and therefore necessary to aver that the respondent resisted and obstructed Judkins as a sheriff in the performance of the duties of his office. The further allegation, that he was legally appointed and duly qualified, although unnecessary to be alleged, was descriptive of a matter material to be charged, and therefore necessary to be proved.

*A new trial granted.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
```

[Federal Register: May 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 84)]
[Notices]               
[Page 23318]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03my10-100]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6983]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``John Baldessari: Pure Beauty''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``John Baldessari: Pure Beauty,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Los Angeles 
County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about June 27 2010, 
until on or about September 12, 2010; at the Metropolitan Museum of 
Art, New York, NY, from on or about October 18, 2010, until on or about 
January 9, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-10255 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending July 2, 2011

|Filer                 | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST MARINER BANCORP | CIC         | Priam Capital Fund I, LP, Priam Capital Associates, LLC, and Howard Feinglass, all of Wilmington, Delaware, to acquire up to 24.9% of the voting shares of First Mariner Bancorp, Baltimore, Maryland. | Newspaper:07/13/2011Federal Register:07/19/2011
|Newspaper:            | 07/13/2011 
|Federal Register:     | 07/19/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
OMB Control No. 2060 - 0347

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimate s, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. En vironmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N W, W ashingto n, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. EPA Form 5900 - 20
#### Taylor & Farley Organ Co. *v.*Starkey.

The authority of an agent to sell goods is not authority to exchange them in barter.

Trover, for an organ. Facts found by the court. The organ was delivered by the plaintiffs to one Davis, under a contract, in writing, in which it was, among other things, stipulated that Davis should make efforts to sell it for them, and pay over the proceeds less his commissions. It was agreed that the plaintiffs should not part with their title until they were paid. The contract was admitted in evidence, subject to the defendant’s exception.

The defendant received the organ of Davis in exchange for a buggy and $40 cash. When the exchange was made, Davis in*143formed the defendant that he was the plaintiffs’ agent. The organ was demanded before this suit was brought.

*Healey*and Lane, for the plaintiffs.

*Faulkners Batchelder,*for the defendant.

Stanley, J.

The contract between the plaintiffs and Davis was properly admitted. It was evidence of the agreement under which Davis was in possession, and tended to show that his authority was to sell, and not to exchange. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, to sell means to sell for cash. Davis, having no *t*authority except to sell for cash, could not lawfully exchange for other property, either in whole or in part (Story Agency, s. 78), and if he did the title would not pass, for the plaintiffs did not hold Davis out, or authorize him to hold himself out, as owner of the organ. *Holton*v. *Smith,*7 N. H. 446; *Burnham*v. *Holt,*14 N. H. 367; *Towle*v. *Leavitt,*23 N H. 360.

*Judgment for the*plaintiffs.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending September 19, 2009

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|USAMERIBANCORP, INC. | * 3A3         | USAmeriBancorp, Inc., Largo, Florida, to acquire 49.7 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Aliant Financial Corporation, and its subsidiary, Aliant Bank, both of Alexander City, Alabama. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/22/2009
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 09/22/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 13, 1995 (78), Para 78.7 Message from the President]
[Page 889]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.78.7  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.
```
§ 1104.13 Replies and motions. ( a ) *Time.* A party may file a reply or motion addressed to any pleading within 20 days after the pleading is filed with the Board, unless otherwise provided.
( b ) *Number of copies.* The original of a reply or motion should be accompanied by the same number of copies required to be filed with the pleading to which the reply or motion is addressed.
( c ) *Reply to a Reply.* A reply to a reply is not permitted.
[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996]
#### § 1103.1 Register of practitioners.

The Board maintains a register containing the names of all non-attorneys entitled to practice before it. The register is maintained according to the individual non-attorney practitioner's name and not by corporate or firm name. Corporations and firms are not admitted or recognized as practitioners before the Board.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



Certification of President



I, Wm. Lee Popham, President, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Admiral Financial Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: September 25, 2010



/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham, President
98-2267.

#### In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law.

Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1476, 701 N.E.2d 382.

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration in this case be, and hereby is, denied.
<PAGE>



                                                               Exhibit 99.2(vii)



[CHASE LOGO]
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                      CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2001-S7


Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November
1, 2001 between Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation, Servicer and Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation hereby provides the following Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof,




/s/ Lucy P. Gambino                         /s/ Susan Christman
---------------------------                 -----------------------------------
Lucy P. Gambino                             Susan Christman
Vice President                              Assistant Treasurer





Certified March 6, 2002


723D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          63,173
<SECURITIES>                                    29,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,424)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,966
<PP&E>                                          39,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,887
<BONDS>                                        180,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,161
<SALES>                                          7,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,058
<CGS>                                            8,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,928
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
#### City Club of Auburn, Appellant, *v.*John A. McGeer Respondent.

(Submitted May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 198 N. Y. 160, 609.)