alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4457 MICHAEL A. SPAIN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-99-8) Submitted: July 25, 2000 Decided: August 11, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Beverly M. Murray, Petersburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, S. David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Michael A. Spain pled guilty to one count of possession of cocainein violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 844 (West 1999) and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000). The district court sentenced Spain to twenty-four months in prison on the drug conviction and a concurrent eighty-four months in prison on the firearm conviction. Spain appeals, claiming that he was entitled to a downward departure due to thequantity of drugs involved and that the district court erred by increasing his offense level for obstruction of justice. We dismiss the appeal.In his plea agreement, Spain waived the right to appeal any sentence within the statutory maximum. The district court accepted Spain's guilty plea at a hearing conducted in accordance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed Spain's plea agreement and the Rule 11 colloquy and find that Spain made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal. See United States v. Broughton-Jones , 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir. 1995). Because Spain's sentence was within the statutory maximum, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134922 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 134922 

 COA: 269919 

Ingham CC: 05-000749-FC

MONTREAL DARNELL CHRISTIAN-BATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. On remand, the 

Court of Appeals shall address whether the trial judge’s admitted error in cutting off 

defense counsel’s closing argument was harmless, taking into consideration that the 

defendant admitted shooting at the victim, the only question for the jury was the 

defendant’s intent, and the defendant was convicted of the lesser offense of assault with 

intent to do great bodily harm. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal. 

d0108 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 11, 2008 

Clerk
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending October 22, 2011

|Filer                            | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|RAIFFEISEN BANK INTERNATIONAL AG | FBSEA          | Raiffeisen Bank International AG, Vienna, Austria, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended and Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                       | Not available 
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 72.20-5 Intent.

Accommodations provided for officers and crew on all vessels shall be securely constructed, properly lighted, heated, drained, ventilated, equipped, located, arranged, and insulated from undue noise, heat, and odors.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16903, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58281, Sept. 29, 2014]
#### Levi W. Flagg *v.*Samuel Swift and others.

Motion denied, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending November 3, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 18, 2011

----

Testimony and Statements            Banking Supervision -- statement by Michael R. Foley, senior associate director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, before a subcomittee of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the supervision and examination of financial institutions and changes to the Board's supervisory policies and procedures in response to the recent financial crisis.            -Published, June 15, 2011                        Capital and Liquidity Standards -- statement by Governor Tarullo before the House Committee on Financial Services on capital and liquidity standards and their relationship to international competitiveness.            -Published, June 16, 2011                        Dodd-Frank Act and Derivatives -- statement by Michael S. Gibson, senior associate director, Division of Research and Statistics, before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry regarding the implementation of title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and the Board's responsibilities for over-the-counter derivatives.            -Published, June 15, 2011            Bank Holding Companies            Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo, Japan -- application to acquire up to 24.9 percent of the voting shares of Morgan Stanley, New York, New York, and indirectly acquire an interest in its subsidiary banks, Morgan Stanley Bank, National Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Morgan Stanley Private Bank, National Association, Purchase, New York, and in certain nonbanking operations of Morgan Stanley.            -Approved, June 14, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity) -- publication for comment of a proposed rule to clarify that motor vehicle dealers temporarily are not required to comply with certain data collection requirements in the Dodd-Frank Act until the Board issues final regulations.             -Approved, June 17, 2011            Enforcement            Heritage Commerce Corp., San Jose, California, and Heritage Bank -- written agreement dated February 17, 2010, terminated June 9, 2011.            -Announced, June 14, 2011                        Northwest Bancorporation, Inc., Palatine, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, June 14, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 20, 2008

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|OHIO HERITAGE BANK | * Branch       | Ohio Heritage Bank, Coshocton, OH to establish a branch at 1309 Fourth Street, N.W., New Philadelphia, OH. | Newspaper:09/24/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 09/24/2008    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.17 After Recess--5:00 P.M.]
[Page 377]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.17  after recess--5:00 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, called the House to order.
```
Exhibit31.2

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

 

I,Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners XI;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.     The registrant'sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending July 24, 2010

|Filer                                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC. | CIC           | Jeffrey T. Valcourt, JNV Limited Partnership, II, and JNV Limited Partnership, III, all of Arlington, Vrginia, acting in concert to control 33.77% of the voting shares of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., Vienna, Virginia. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                               | Not available
|Federal Register:                        | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 4.58
 NOVATION AGREEMENT
 th
 1.
    
    Parsons Brinckerhoff (Asia) Limited(CHINESE CHARACTERS) of 7th Floor,
One Kowloon, 1 Wang Yuen Street, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as
Parsons),2.
    
    Zastron Precision-Tech Limited(CHINESE CHARACTERS) of Units 5811-5812,
58th Floor, The Center, 99 Queens Road Central, Central, Hong Kong (hereinafter
referred to as ZPT),3.
    
    Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limitedof Units 5811-5812,
58th Floor, The Center, 99 Queens Road Central, Central, Hong Kong
(hereinafter referred to as NTEEP).
  (I)
    
    Parsons and ZPT have entered into a Design Consultancy Agreement
dated 30 July 2007 in respect of a building project in Wuxi (the
Agreement).(II)
    
    ZPT wishes to be released and discharged from the Agreement and
Parsons has agreed to release and discharge ZPT, upon NTEEP
undertaking to perform the Agreement and to be bound by the terms of
the Agreement in place of ZPT with effect from the date of this Novation
Agreement (this Date).
  1.
    
    NTEEP undertakes with Parsons with effect from this Date to be bound by and to perform all
the terms of the Agreement and to assume all obligations and duties and liabilities under the
Agreement in every way as if NTEEP were an original party to the Agreement in lieu of ZPT.




---



##### 



2.
    
    NTEEP hereby ratifies all previous acts and deeds taken or done by ZPT
with respect to the Agreement as if the same had been taken or done by
NTEEP.3.
    
    ZPT hereby assigns and transfers to NTEEP all rights, benefits, titles and
interest of ZPT in and under the Agreement. The term (CHINESE CHARACTERS) as
used in the Agreement shall as from this Date refer to NTEEP.4.
    
    With effect from this Date, Parsons releases and discharges ZPT from all
claims and demands and liabilities whatever in respect of or related to the
Agreement and accepts the liability of NTEEP under the Agreement in lieu
of the liability of ZPT and agrees to be bound by and to perform all the
terms of the Agreement in every way as if NTEEP were an original party to
the Agreement in lieu of ZPT.5.
    
    This Novation Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with Hong Kong laws, and the parties hereto submit to the
non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Hong Kong courts.
  Signed by Parsons Brinckerhoff
    
    
    )(Asia) Limited and its duly
    
    
    )
    
    
    [Signed]authorized representative
    
    
    )Sealed with the Common Seal of
    
    
    )Zastron Precision-Tech Limited and
    
    
    )
    
    
    [Signed]Signed by John Quinto Farina
    
    
    )




---



##### 



its director
    
    
    )Sealed with the Common Seal of
    
    
    )Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical
    
    
    )Products Limited and signed by
    
    
    )
    
    
    [Signed]Masaaki Yasukawa and
    
    
    )Wong Kuen Ling
    
    
    )its directors
    
    
    )
#### § 15.17 Consequences of unauthorized disclosure of SSI.

Violation of this part is grounds for a civil penalty and other enforcement or corrective action by DOT, and appropriate personnel actions for Federal employees. Corrective action may include issuance of an order requiring retrieval of SSI to remedy unauthorized disclosure or an order to cease future unauthorized disclosure.
§ 71.65-1 General. ( a ) The list of required plans is general in character, but includes all plans in § 71.65-5 which normally show construction and safety features coming under the cognizance of the Coast Guard. In the case of a particular vessel, all of the plans enumerated may not be applicable, and it is intended that only those plans and specifications be submitted as will clearly show the vessel's arrangement, construction and required equipment.
( b ) In the list of required plans in § 71.65-5 the items which must be approved by the American Bureau of Shipping for vessels classed by that organization are indicated by an asterisk. When prints bearing record of such approval by the American Bureau of Shipping are forwarded to the Coast Guard they will in general be accepted as satisfactory except insofar as the law or the Coast Guard regulations contain requirements which are not covered by the American Bureau of Shipping.
( c ) Plans and specifications for cargo gear shall be approved by either a recognized classification society or the International Cargo Gear Bureau, Inc., whose home office is located at 481 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10001 on the Internet at *http://www.icgb.com .*
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16895, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51204, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2008-0906, 73 FR 56510, Sept. 29, 2008; USCG-2021-0348, 87 FR 3224, Jan. 21, 2022]