alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael J. Blumenfeld, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Collegiate Pacific Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Collegiate Pacific Inc. for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Collegiate Pacific Inc. Date: September 28, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael J. BlumenfeldMichael J. Blumenfeld,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 I, William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Collegiate
Pacific Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Collegiate Pacific Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Collegiate Pacific Inc. Date: September 28, 2004
    
    /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1865

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide that

the same limitation on contributions to candidates shall apply to

multicandidate political committees and other persons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1995

Mr. WHITFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

provide that the same limitation on contributions to candidates shall apply to multicandidate political committees

and other persons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SAME LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO

4 CANDIDATES TO APPLY TO MULTICANDIDATE

5 POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND OTHER PER6 SONS.

7 Section 315(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act

8 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)) is amended—
2

•HR 1865 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking out

2 ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$3,000’’;

3 and

4 (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking out

5 ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$3,000’’.

6 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

7 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with

8 respect to elections taking place more than 6 years after

9 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 109.7 Removal from transportation.

An agent may remove a package and related packages in a shipment or a freight container from transportation in commerce for up to forty-eight (48) hours when the agent has an objectively reasonable and articulable belief that the packages may pose an imminent hazard. The agent must record this belief in writing as soon as practicable and provide written notification stating the reason for removal to the person in possession.
<PAGE>   1


                                EXHIBIT 10(m)(2)

<PAGE>   2
                                                                EXHIBIT 10(m)(2)

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                     PEOPLES HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                              THRIFT INCENTIVE PLAN

         The Peoples Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Thrift Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") was last amended and restated effective generally January 1, 1996. The
Plan is hereby further amended as set forth herein.

         1.       The terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings set
forth in the Plan unless the context indicates otherwise.

         2.       Effective January 1, 1996, Section 14.3(d) shall be amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                  "(d) On and after the Plan Affiliation Date, the rights of
         participants and beneficiaries of participants under the Predecessor
         Plan shall be determined strictly in accordance with the terms of this
         Plan; provided that, in accordance with Paragraph (g), each such
         participant's Predecessor Plan Account shall be invested and reinvested
         in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Predecessor Plan
         until the date on which the Predecessor Plan's assets are transferred
         to the trust under this Plan ("transfer date");"

         3.       Effective July 1, 1996, Appendix A shall be amended to refer
to Schedule No. 2, relating to the Bank of New Hampshire Corporation Tax
Deferred Savings & Investment Plan (the "BONH Plan"), in substantially the same
form as attached hereto. Said Schedule shall be prepared by the Plan
Administrator to set forth the benefits, rights, and features remaining in
effect with respect to a Participant's Predecessor Plan Account attributable to
the BONH Plan.

                               * * * * * * * * * *

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, to record the adoption of this First Amendment as
of the effective date stated herein, Peoples Heritage Financial Group, Inc. has
caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 31st
day of December, 1996.

                                        PEOPLES HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.



                                        By  ___________________________________
                                               Its
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-0112V 

Filed: July 8, 2016

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JULIE FISK, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

 * Hepatitis A and B Vaccine (Twinrix);

v. * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

 * Administration (“SIRVA”); Special

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Jennifer L. Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On January 27, 2016, Julie Fisk (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that her receipt of a Twinrix 

(hepatitis A and B) vaccine on February 13, 2014, caused her to suffer a shoulder 

injury. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of 

the Office of Special Masters.

On July 8, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report in which she concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep. at 1. Specifically, 

respondent stated, based on her evaluation of the evidence, that petitioner’s injury is 

consistent with shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), and that the 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

injury was caused-in-fact by her vaccination. Id. at 3. Respondent further stated that 

she did not identify any other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA, and that petitioner’s 

medical records demonstrated that she has suffered the residual effects of her condition 

for more than six months. Id. Petitioner has therefore satisfied all legal prerequisites for 

compensation under the Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 1, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
GERAID C. MANN 

Eon. L. R. Thompson 

County Auditor 

Taylor County 

Abllene, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. O-1001 

Re: Can the commissioners' court 

legally make donations to the 

Tuberculosis Association, to 

the American National Red Cross, 

or to any other charitable or 

other organization making requests for such donations? 

Your request for opinion upon the above stated question 

has been received and considered by this department. 

We are unable to find any constitutional or statutory 

authority for the expenditure or donation of county funds by the 

commissfoners' court for the purposes above described. 

The courts of Texas have repeatedly held that county 

commilssloners' courts may exercise only such authority a8 is 

conferred by the Constitution and Statutes of this State. There 

are abundant authorities to this effect. We cite the followlng: 

Article 5, Section 18, Texas Constitution; 

ArtFcle 2351, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas; 

Tejras Jurisprudence, Vol. 11, pages 563-566; 

Bland Vs. Orr, 39 SW 558; 

Nunn-Warren Publishing Company vs. Hutchinson 

County, 45 SW 2nd 651; 

Hogg vs. Campbell, 48 SW 2nd 515; 

Landman vs. State, 97 SW 2nd 264; 

El Paso County vs. Elam, 106 SW 2nd 393; 

Howard vs. Henderson County, 1.16 SW 2nd 2791; 

Dobson vs. Marshall, 118 SW 2nd 621; 

Mills County vs. Lampasas County, 40 SW 404. 

This department has repeatedly ruled to the same-'effect. 

For example, opinion No. O-591 of this Department'held that the 

commissioners I court of Galveston County, Texas was without 
Hon. L. R. Thompson, page 2 O-1001 

authority to expend county funds for the employment of lifg 

guards for Galveston Beach; opinion No. 0-1085 of this Department 

held that the commissioners1 COUY?t of MariOn COUntg, Texas was 

without authority to pay the salary of a game warden; and 

opinion No. O-1299 of this Department held that the commissioners' 

court of Bexar County, Texas, was without authority to expend 

county funds for fire protection from the City of San Anton10 

for outside the city of San Antonio and in the county. 

Conference Opinion No. 2662 of this Department, 

dated February 4, 1927, Book 62, p. 48, 1926-1938 Attorney 

General's Report, p. 390 et seq., written by Hon. D. A. Simmons, 

First Assistant Attorney General, held that the commlssFbner3' 

court had no authority to appropriate public funds to ch&it&ble 

organizations managed and controlled by private Indivlauals and 

that Constitution of 1876, Art. 3, Section 50, 51 and 52; Art. 

8, Sec. 3; Art. 11, Sec. 3, and Art. 16, Sec. 6 referred to; 

prohibit the appropriation of public funds to charities operated 

by private individuals. 

You are therefore respectfully advised that it Is the 

opinion of this department that the county commlssloners' court 

is without lawful authority to expend or donate county funds for 

the purposes above mentioned. 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

WJF:AW:wc' 

APPROVE) DEC 13, 1939 

a/Gerald C. Mann 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By s/km. J. Fanning 

Wm. J. Fanning 

AsSi8taI-d 

APPROW OPINION COMMITTEE BY s/BWB CRAIRMAN
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 2, 2013

|Filer                     | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. | * 3A5       | Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Williamsport, PA to acquire 100% of Luzerne National Bank Corporation, Luzerne, PA. | Newspaper:03/01/2013Federal Register:02/28/2013
|Newspaper:                | 03/01/2013 
|Federal Register:         | 02/28/2013 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Wilder *v.*Wheeler.

A grant of the right to lay down an aqueduct upon land of the grantor and draw water therefrom for the use of the grantee, does not convey an assignable interest unless words of inheritance are used, or it can be inferred from the language of the whole deed that such was the intent of the parties.

Covenant. Plea, *non est*factum, with a brief statement that the deed declared on did not convey to or confer upon the plaintiff the right to enter upon the defendant’s land, or to take water from the defendant’s aqueduct, as alleged. Facts found by a referee. November 9, 1847, the defendant, by an agreement under seal, acknowledged and recorded, in consideration of one dollar and of an annual rent of six dollars, granted to the Peterborough North Cotton Factory the right to enter upon his land where he then lived, in Peterborough, and lay down an aqueduct, and repair the same when necessary; also the right to connect the same with the main pipe of his aqueduct between his dwelling-house and the outlet at his barn, and draw therefrom a full supply of water for the company’s use at its factory buildings, reserving to himself the first or exclusive right to a prudent use of the water at his house and barn. Immediately upon the execution of this deed the company entered on the defendant’s land, and connected a lead pipe with his aqueduct at the point mentioned in the deed, and laid the same to its, factory buildings, and supplied them with water from the defendant’s aqueduct so long as it continued to own the buildings. The company subsequently conveyed its buildings to one Noone, who, in 1830, conveyed to the plaintiff with the right to take water from the defendant’s aqueduct. The defendant subsequently built a> new barn at a lower level than his old barn, and kept more stock, and constructed fountains in front of his house, and thereby used more water, so that the plaintiff was unable to obtain a sufficient supply for his buildings at all times. In 1873 he disconnected his pipe and took it up, and brought this suit for his damages.

*O. H.*Burns, for the plaintiff.

*A. F. Stevens*(N. *M. Smith*with him), for the defendant.

*352Smith, J.

The defendant’s agreement or deed to tbe Peterborough North Cotton Factory limited the right to take water from his aqueduct to that company. No words of inheritance are used. The grant is not expressed to be to the company, its “ successors and assigns,” or in equivalent words, but to the Peterborough North Cotton Factory. Nor is there anything in the language of the whole instrument that shows an intention to convey an assignable interest. This case differs in this respect from *Cole*v. *Lake Com*pany, 54 N. H. 242, where, although the word “heirs ” was omitted from the lease, it appeared from the language of the whole lease that a covenant for perpetual enjoyment was intended. As the right acquired by the company was not assignable, the plaintiff acquired from Noone, the company’s grantee, no easement in the defendant’s land. The defendant is entitled to

*Judgment on the report.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 1114.5 Records in other Board proceedings.

If any portion of the record before the Board in any proceeding other than the proceeding at issue is offered in evidence, a true copy will be presented for the record.

[47 FR 49562, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52713, Oct. 8, 1996]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, June 26, 1995 (86), Para 86.1 Designation of Speaker Pro Tempore]
[Page 1041]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.86.1  designation of speaker pro tempore

  The House was called to order by the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. 
GOODLATTE, who laid before the House the following communication:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                    June 26, 1995.
       I hereby designate the Honorable Bob Goodlatte to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                    Newt Gingrich,
                          Speaker of the House of Representatives.
```
This document is protected under FIFRA. Document may be requested under the

Freedom of Information Act at Http:// www.epa/pesticide/foia but access is restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or distribution of pesticides outside the United States.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 4, 2011

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|ASB BANCORP, INC.         | * 3A1          | ASB Bancorp, Inc., Asheville, North Carolina, to become a bank holding company upon the conversion of Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B., Asheville, North Carolina, from a mutual to stock form of ownership.                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/01/2011    
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | 07/01/2011    
|HERITAGE BANK             | * Branch       | Heritage Bank, Norfolk, Virginia, to establish a branch at 1403 Greenbrier Parkway, Chesapeake, Virginia                                                                                                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|PARK STERLING CORPORATION | * 3A5          | Park Sterling Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of Community Capital Corporation, Greenwood, South Carolina, and thereby indirectly acquire CapitalBank, Greenwood, South Carolina. | Newspaper:06/24/2011Federal Register:06/24/2011       
|Newspaper:                | 06/24/2011    
|Federal Register:         | 06/24/2011    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
H. R. 1772

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain interests in the Waihee

Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS FOR INCLUSION IN

THE OAHU NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX.

(a) AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE.—The Secretary of the Interior

may acquire, for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge

Complex, the area known as the Waihee Marsh, located on the

northeast coast of the Island of Oahu, Hawaii, consisting of approximately 36 acres (as determined by the Secretary) along both sides

of Kamehameha Highway.

(b) MANAGEMENT OF ACQUIRED INTERESTS.—Lands and

interests acquired by the United States under this section shall

be managed by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the Oahu

National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.