alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending May 9, 2009

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BSB BANCORP MHC             | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by BSB Bancorp, MHC and BSB Bancorp, Inc., both of Belmont, Massachusetts - to become a mutual bank holding company and stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Belmont Savings Bank, Belmont, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1) and 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/01/2009
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | 06/01/2009   
|DIME MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY | * 3A1         | Application filed by Dime Mutual Holding Company, Norwich, Connecticut to become a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting shares of Dime Bank, Norwich, Connecticut, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act.                                                                                    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/26/2009
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | 05/26/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1112.6 Verified statements; contents.

A verified statement should contain all the facts upon which the witness relies, and to the extent that it contains arguments, they should be based only on those facts. Parties filing reply and rebuttal verified statements will be considered to have admitted the truth of material allegations of fact contained in their opponents' statements unless those allegations are specifically challenged. Rebuttal statements shall be confined to issues raised in the reply statements to which they are directed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners XI 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000702986
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          29,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,097)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,007
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,731
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.30)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Louis Buchler et al., Appellants, v. The Special Term, Part 3, of the Supreme Court et al., Respondents.

*People ex rel. Buchler*v. *Special Term, Part 3, Supreme Court,*137 App. Div. 765, appeal dismissed.

(Argued May 31, 1910;

decided June 7, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 19, 1910, which denied a motion for an alternative writ of prohibition to restrain certain proceedings for the revocation of a liquor tax certificate.

The motion was made upon the ground that the order was not appealable to the Court of Appeals.

*522
      *Robert J. Fish*for motion.

*Frederick Durgan*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
§ 67.97 United States built. To be considered built in the United States a vessel must meet both of the following criteria: ( a ) All major components of its hull and superstructure are fabricated in the United States; and
( b ) The vessel is assembled entirely in the United States.
#### § 77.06-1 Installation.

The installation of all lifesaving appliances and arrangements must be in accordance with the requirements of subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25288, May 20, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of United Investors Income Properties (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.24 Clerk to Correct Engrossment]
[Page 747]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.24  clerk to correct engrossment

  On motion of Mr. SHUSTER, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That in the engrossment of the foregoing bill the Clerk be 
authorized to correct section numbers, cross references, and 
punctuation, and to make such stylistic, clerical, technical, 
conforming, and other changes as may be necessary to reflect the actions 
of the House in amending the bill.
```
#### In the Matter of Thomas McKenna.

Decree affirmed, costs of appeal of both parties to be paid out of the fund. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,551
<SECURITIES>                                     6,503
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,830
<PP&E>                                          32,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,388
<BONDS>                                         27,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,985
<SALES>                                         11,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,481
<CGS>                                           15,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (24,634)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,285)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit31.2

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

CertificationPURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Patricia N. McClanahan, certify that:

1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofFirst Farmers and Merchants Corporation;

2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)   The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a.    Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

c.    Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5)   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

| Date  October 29, 2004 | \s\ Patricia N. McClanahan                                     |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Patricia N.  McClanahan, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 1, 2011

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|FNB BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A1       | FNB Bancshares, Inc., Sycamore, OH to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of First National Bank of Sycamore, Sycamore, OH. | Newspaper:01/20/2011Federal Register:01/24/2011
|Newspaper:           | 01/20/2011 
|Federal Register:    | 01/24/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-2275.

#### Toledo Pub. Schools v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 96-A-1563. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Pursuant to this court’s March 26, 1998 order establishing a pilot mediation program, a mediation conference was scheduled in this case. In the course of mediation, the parties stipulated to values in settlement of this appeal and filed a joint motion requesting remand of this matter to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry of an order reflecting the stipulated settlement of this matter. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for remand be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





I, Richard D. Crowley, Jr. of
Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to the requirement
set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:





(i)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:
August 6,
2009                                                                                      
                                                                                                     
/s/ RICHARD D.
CROWLEY, JR.


Richard D. Crowley, Jr.


Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
From: Susan Fairchild

To: Reeves, David; Hancy, Cindy Wang; Bronstein, Katherine

Cc: Angus Crane; Edris, Steve

Subject: Subcategorization of collection

Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:22:07 AM

Attachments: ATT722625.gif

ATT722626.gif

ATT722627.gif

This alternative presented by Angus Crane in NAIMA's June 30, 2011 letter to Madeline Barch in OP

shows the best opportunity of all the potential subcategorization alternatives. This subcategorization

affects IIG, Rockwool and Thermafiber. 

As you know, I spoke with IIG 2 weeks ago and they have the drum collection system, which is a

completely different design from either vertical or horizontal screen.

I spoke with Thermafiber this morning (Steve Edris), and Steve advised me of the differences in these

3 designs, why they are used to make different products, and why the orientation of the screen (vertical

at his plant) does make a difference in both product end use and formaldehyde emissions. It is not an

indiscrimate design, but rather is chosen according to the market niche the company is filling. 

We can also use Angus' information on products made in his letter (also copied below) to inform our

argument for subcategorization, although under that outline, all 3 of these facilities are in the same

subcategory. 

I'll write up my conversation with both IIG and Thermafiber for the project record. 

It makes sense to me to subcategorize according to all 3 collection designs- drum, horizontal screen,

and vertical screen. 

Because design does influence the quality of products, and because it can dictate which products you

can market, it is appropriate to set the new MACT floor for each subcategory, as David Rostker with

SBA requested yesterday in the SBAR Panel meeting.

Please use the emissions test data provided by each plant and determine the UPL-derived MACT

floors and New Source MACT for each subcategory.

Susan Fairchild

Environmental Scientist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

direct line: 919.541.5167

fax: 919.541-3207

email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243-02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709

"We can not solve our problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them" -
-Albert Einstein
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11766

 

ANGELES PARTNERSXI

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.

[X]Yes [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No