alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the accompanying balance sheets of MGI PHARMA, INC.  as of September 30, 1996, 
and the related statement of operations for the nine month period ended 
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996 
<CASH>                                      4,387,781
<SECURITIES>                               14,716,561 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 648,256 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   70,217 
<INVENTORY>                                   755,505 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           20,594,501       
<PP&E>                                        221,662      
<DEPRECIATION>                                751,203    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             21,242,796      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,522,375    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                   18,720,421 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                          0       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               21,242,796         
<SALES>                                     4,430,680          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            6,604,636          
<CGS>                                         477,275          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            4,775,385       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (4,041,024)        
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (4,041,024)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                              (4,041,024) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.31)     
        

</TABLE>
§ 1011.4 Delegations to individual Board Members. ( a ) The following matters are referred to the Chairman of the Board: ( 1 ) Entry of reparation orders responsive to findings authorizing the filing of statements of claimed damages as provided at 49 CFR part 1133.
( 2 ) Extensions of time for compliance with orders and procedural matters in any formal case or pending matter, except appeals taken from the decision of a hearing officer on requests for discovery.
( 3 ) Postponement of the effective date of orders in proceedings that are the subject of suits brought in a court to enjoin, suspend, or set aside the decision.
( 4 ) Dismissal of complaints and applications on the unopposed motion of any party.
( 5 ) Requests for access to waybills and to statistics reported under orders of the Board.
( 6 ) Exercise of control over litigation arising under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), except for determinations whether to seek further judicial review of: ( i ) A decision in which a court finds under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(F) that Board personnel may have acted arbitrarily or capriciously in improperly withholding records from disclosure; or
( ii ) A decision in which a court finds under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(4) that Board personnel acted intentionally or willfully in violating the Privacy Act.
( 7 ) Issuance of certificates and decisions authorizing Consolidated Rail Corporation to abandon or discontinue service over lines for which an application under section 308 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, 45 U.S.C. 748, has been filed.
( 8 ) Designation in writing of employees authorized to inspect and copy records and to inspect and examine lands, buildings, and equipment pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11144, 14122, and 15722.
( 9 ) Authority to act alone to take necessary actions in emergency situations when the Chairman is the only Board member reasonably available.
( b ) The following matters are referred to the Vice Chairman of the Board: ( 1 ) Matters within the jurisdiction of the Accounting Board if certified to the Vice Chairman by the Accounting Board or if removed from the Accounting Board by the Vice Chairman.
( 2 ) Matters involving the admission, disbarment, or discipline of practitioners before the Board under 49 CFR part 1103.
( c ) The Chairman, Vice Chairman, or other Board Member to whom a matter is assigned under this part may certify such matter to the Board.
( d ) The Chairman shall notify all Board Members that a petition for a stay has been referred to the Chairman for disposition under paragraphs (a)(2) or (3) of this section. The Chairman shall also inform all Board Members of the decision on that petition before service of such decision. At the request of a Board Member, made at any time before the Chairman's decision is served, the petition will be referred to the Board for decision.
[67 FR 60167, Sept. 25, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 8726, Feb. 25, 2003; 81 FR 8850, Feb. 23, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        443,800
<SECURITIES>                                3,296,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,768,900
<PP&E>                                     25,242,500
<DEPRECIATION>                             10,138,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             18,917,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         879,900
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 18,000,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               18,917,800
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,627,500
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 974,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               98,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            25,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   25,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending September 12, 2009

|Filer                 | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|KLEIN FINANCIAL, INC. | * 3A3       | Klein Financial, Inc,Chaska, Minnesota, to acquire 100% of Community Bank Plymouth, Plymouth, Minnesota. | Newspaper:10/02/2009Federal Register:10/02/2009
|Newspaper:            | 10/02/2009 
|Federal Register:     | 10/02/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                     | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NORTHWESTERN BK, CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN | 153054 | 05/11/2009 | 08/31/2009     | O         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Souhegan National Bank *v.*Wallace, *Adm'r.*

On an appeal from a commissioner of insolvency, the creditors’ claim is heard and tried as though no prior proceedings had been had, and, except in determining the costs, it is immaterial whether it was allowed or disallowed by the commissioner.

Appeal, from a commissioner of insolvency, by W. H. T. and heirs. The report of the commissioner, as originally returned to the probate court, erroneously stated the plaintiffs’ claim at less than the sum actually allowed, and upon petition it was recommitted for a correction of the error. The administrator was aware of the error, and requested the commissioner to correct it. • By the correction, the amount allowed the plaintiffs, as shown by the first report, was largely increased. The appellant objected that no sufficient notice was given of the hearing to correct the error, and that for this reason the plaintiffs could not recover beyond the amount of the claim as originally set down in the report. The court ruled otherwise, and the_ appellant excepted. Against the appellant’s objection the plaintiffs were allowed to amend their declaration by inserting a claim for interest.

*Gutter*and *Sawyer*Sawyer, Jr., for the appellant.

*A. W.*Sawyer, for the plaintiffs.

Clark, J.

It is unnecessary to determine whether the course of procedure in correcting the error in the commissioner’s report was in conformity to the statute, because, an appeal being taken, the amount of the plaintiffs’ claim is determined by the judgment on the appeal, and not by the sum stated in the commissioner’s report. On appeal from a comnlissioner of insolvency, the credit- or’s claim is heard and tried as though no prior proceedings had been had, and, except in determining the costs, it is immaterial whether it was allowed or disallowed by the commissioner. The only limitation is, that the claim must be the same that was presented to the commissioner. *Rich*v. *Eldredge,*42 N. H. 246, 253. If the plaintiffs’ claim was interest. bearing ’ interest, it should be allowed (G. L., *c.*199, *s.*8), and it does not appear that the amendment was necessary or material. The plaintiffs could be allowed to amend as in a suit originally brought in the trial term of this court. G. L., *c.*200, *s.*17. The amendment adding to the' declaration a claim for interest was allowed, upon facts appearing at the trial term. And as those facts are not stated in the reserved case, the appellant shows no error of law, and does not sustain his exception to the allowance of the amendment.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.R.B., a child, * From the County Court at Law

 of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CV1103113.

No. 11-12-00310-CV * June 12, 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we 

reverse the judgment of the trial court insofar as it found a child support arrearage in the 

amount of $1,120, and we render judgment to reflect an arrearage in the amount of 

$280. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. The costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Kimberly Branham.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Merritt C. Brown, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, of Mega Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filingdate of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controlsor in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
98-1843.

#### Rush v. Astro Container Co.

Hamilton App. No. C-970759. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-2723, *Johnson v. BP Chem., Inc.,*Allen App. No. 1-97-32; briefing schedule stayed.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening and Extending of Delancey Street. Lucius H. Beers et al., as Trustees under the Will of Robert R. Stuyvesant, Deceased, Appellants.

*Matter of City of New York (Delancey Street),*136 App. Div. 546, affirmed.

(Submitted June 1, 1910;

decided June 17, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 4,1910, which affirmed an order of the Special Term denying a motion for an order directing payment of interest upon an award made in the above-entitled proceeding.

*Henry de Forest Baldwin*for appellants.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel {Theodore Connoly, Joel J. Squier*and *George F. Draper*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
§ 1018.21 Telephone inquiries and investigations. ( a ) If a debtor has not responded to one or more written demands, the Board shall make reasonable efforts by telephone to determine the debtor's intentions. If the debtor cannot be reached by telephone at the debtor's place of employment, the Board may telephone the debtor at his or her residence between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m.
( b ) The Board may undertake an investigation to locate a debtor, if the whereabouts of a debtor is a problem, or if a debtor cannot be contacted by telephone. The Board may also send a representative to a debtor's place of employment if the debtor cannot be contacted by phone or the debtor does not respond to written demands by the Board for payment of claims.
( c ) The Board under 15 U.S.C. 1681(f) may obtain consumer credit information from private firms, including name, address, former address, place of employment, and former place of employment of a debtor.
Exhibit No. 99.01
Form 10-KSB
Red Horse Entertainment Corporation
File No. 0-23015

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                                  Act of 2002.

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Red  Horse  Entertainment
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Wayne M. Rogers, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;  and (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.



Date: March 18, 2003                  By:  /s/ Wayne M. Rogers
                                           Chief Executive and Financial Officer
§ 130.125 Notification procedures and contacts. ( a ) The railroad must develop and implement notification procedures that include all of the following: ( 1 ) Procedures for immediate notification of the qualified individual or alternate and immediate communications between that individual, and the appropriate Federal official and the persons providing personnel and equipment;
( 2 ) A checklist of the notifications required under the response plan, listed in the order of priority;
( 3 ) The primary and secondary communication methods by which notifications can be made;
( 4 ) The circumstances and necessary time frames under which the notifications must be made; and
( 5 ) The information to be provided in the initial and each follow-up notification.
( b ) The notification procedures must include the names of the following individuals or organizations, with the ten-digit telephone numbers at which they can be contacted on a 24-hour basis: ( 1 ) The National Response Center (NRC);
( 2 ) Qualified individual, or alternative;
( 3 ) Federal, State, and local agencies that the railroad expects to have pollution control responsibilities or provide pollution control support; and
( 4 ) Personnel or organizations to notify for the activation of equipment and personnel resources identified in § 130.130.
#### § 1253.30 Retention of records.

Each organization subject to sections 5a or 5b shall retain records or documents relating to its transactions or activities in accordance with part 1220, Preservation of Records, of this chapter.

[40 FR 50389, Oct. 29, 1975]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
FirstCity Financial Corporation:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 and Form S-3 of FirstCity Financial Corporation of our report dated
March 24, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FirstCity
Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of FirstCity
Financial Corporation.
 
                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Fort Worth, Texas
March 25, 1998
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending August 11, 2012

|Filer                  | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|HAMPDEN BANCORP, INC.  | CIC         | Notification by Investors of America LP to retain 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the common stock of Hampden Bancorp, Inc., Springfield, Massachusetts, the holding company for Hampden Bank, Springfield, Massachusetts,  pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978. | Newspaper:08/13/2012Federal Register:08/10/2012
|Newspaper:             | 08/13/2012 
|Federal Register:      | 08/10/2012 
|INDEPENDENT BANK CORP. | * 3A5* 3A3  | Application by Independent Bank Corp, Rockland, Massachusetts, to acquire Central Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, Central  Co-operative  Bank, both of Somerville, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.   | Newspaper:08/01/2012Federal Register:07/30/2012
|Newspaper:             | 08/01/2012 
|Federal Register:      | 07/30/2012 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us