alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.28 Memorials]
[Page 653]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.28  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       68. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Hawaii, relative to urging the U.S. Congress to renew the 
     highly successful U.S. Sugar Program in the 1995 farm bill; 
     to the Committee on Agriculture.
       69. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Hawaii, 
     relative to urging the U.S. Congress to renew the highly 
     successful U.S. Sugar Program in the 1995 farm bill; to the 
     Committee on Agriculture.
       70. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Washington, relative to requesting the United States to 
     advocate for the admission of Taiwan to the United Nations; 
     to the Committee on International Relations.
       71. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Washington, relative to water adjudication; to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       72. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Maine, relative to Federal mandates; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
       73. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Washington, relative to urging Congress to use 
     transportation funds for transportation purposes; to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       74. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Minnesota, relative to memorializing Congress to 
     fund the Amtrak system to enable it to continue to serve 
     Minnesota; to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
       75. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, relative to memorializing the 
     Congress of the United States to enact legislation to allow 
     Federal income tax deductions on medical expenditures and 
     health insurance premiums purchased by the self-employed, and 
     other individuals' to the Committee on Ways and Means.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending March 17, 2012

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|DANSKE BANK A/S   | FBSEA          | Danske Bank A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, to establish a branch in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24 of Regulation K.                                                                                                                            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|FIVE STAR BANK    | * 18C          | Five Star Bank, Warsaw, New York, to purchase and assume the assets and liabilities of branches from First Niagara Bank N.A., Buffalo, New York and HSBC Bank USA N.A., McLean, Virginia, pursuant to Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BK OF MILLBROOK, MILLBROOK, NEW YORK | 175609 | 07/25/2011 | 03/07/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, March 24, 1995 (50), Para 50.10 Calendar Wednesday Business Dispensed With]
[Page 504]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.50.10  calendar wednesday business dispensed with

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That business in order for consideration on Wednesday, March 
29, 1995, under clause 7, rule XXIV, the Calendar Wednesday rule, be 
dispensed with.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               458,652
<PP&E>                                       3,949,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                 255,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,263,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,575
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                     1,793,177
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,263,124
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,394
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,824)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,985)
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,772
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 10466 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12

- cv
- 01502

- TWT

ALI NEJAD,
Petitioner

- Appellee,

versus ATTORNEY G ENERAL OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, Respondent, WARDEN, Respondent

- Appellant.

____________ ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ ( September 16, 2015 ) Case: 15-10466 Date Filed: 09/16/2015 Page: 1 of 32 Before MARCUS , WILLIAM PRYOR and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: The State of Georgia appeals the district court’s grant of Ali Nejad’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court granted relief on the ground that Mr. Nejad’s trial counsel rendered
ineffective assistance but did not rule on two other grounds Mr. Nejad r aised in his petition. District judges must resolve all of a habeas petitioner’s claims for relief, regardless of whether relief is granted or denied. Clisby v. Jones , 960 F.2d 925,
935

- 36 (11th Cir. 1992) ( en banc ); see also Puiatti v. McNeil , 626 F.3d 1283, 1307 (11th Cir. 2010) (applying Clisby to vacate a district court ’s order granting relief on one ground and deeming all other grounds moot). When a district judge fails to address all of a petitioner’s claims, we “will vacate the . . . ju dgment without prejudice and remand the case for consideration of all remaining claims.” Clisby , 960 F.2d at 938. Mr. Nejad asserted three claims for relief in his petition: (1) the trial court erroneously charged the jury that a pellet gun was per se a deadly weapon; (2) a juror failed to disclose that she was a rape victim; and (3) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by denying him the choice of whether to testify. A magistrate judge recommended that the district court deny all three claim s . The

Case: 15-10466 Date Filed: 09/16/2015 Page: 2 of 33 district court declined to adopt the magistrate judge’s recommendation , concluding
that habeas relief (a new trial) was warranted based on Mr. Nejad’s ineffective
assistance claim . The court did not, however, address the magistrate judge’s disposi tion of his other two claims. Because the court did not resolve all three claims, Clisby dictates that we

vacate without prejudice the judgment of the district court and remand the case for consideration of Mr. Nejad’s remaining claims for relief. 1
VACATED AND REMANDED.

1 We accordingly do not address the State’s arguments regarding the district court’s disposition of Mr. Nejad’s ineffective assistance claim.

Case: 15-10466 Date Filed: 09/16/2015 Page: 3 of 3
Contact

RhondaChambers Directorof Aviation FortDodge RegionalAirport Phone: (515)573-3881

Ext.3 Fax:(515)955-1431 1639 Nelson Ave

..Suite2 FortDodge. IA 50501 fdairport@fortdodgeiowa.org www.fortdodgeiowa.org 

# 1) 0

# d~-t~ ~\

- \P 

# Ia-'$::l 

# d~

~ 

## ">.;; 

# DFORT ODGE Regional Airport 

# PRESS RELEASE

) 

### Airport Commission will begin process to find new air service.

Fort Dodge.IA January 27. 2014: With the announcement from Great LakesAirljnes suspension of air service on February 1.2014. the airport commission and community partners will begin the process of regaining an air service comer.
The process begins with the U.S. Department of Transportation who administers the Essential Air Service program. The Essential Air Service program began in 1978 after airline deregulation to make sure rural communities were not abandoned.
Great Lakes began providing air service on April 11.2012 after Mesaba Aviation. Inc

.. and Pinnacle Airlines. d/b/a Delta Connections (Delta) filed a notice of their intent to suspend air service to many of its small regional cities. including Fort Dodge. Great Lakes' contract expires on May 31. 2014. Fort Dodge began receiving the Essential Air Service subsidy after 9/11 when Northwest Airlines was the air service provider.
Federal Aviation Regulation 121 changes for PilotCertification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations effective August 1.2013 and Federal Aviation Regulation 117. Flight Crew Member Duty and Rest Requirements effective January 4. 2014 have impacted Great Lakes' ability to retain the number of pilots qualified under the new rulesto meet the needs of their operating schedule. It isestimated that it takes 20%more pilots to fulfill the changes to the duty rest requirements and operate the same schedule as before January 4.2014. Thishas impacted all airlines. including Great LakesAirlines. Since the firstof the year. Great Lakes has cancelled 50%of their scheduled flights due to no pilot crews. Thisseverely impacted the enplanements. Annual enplanements for 2013were 3.061.the lowest number of enplanements since beginning records in 1986. Enplanements for 2011 and 2012were 11.150 and 6.151 respectively. Great Lakesschedule within the EssentialAir Service contract isto provide three daily round trip flights each weekday and two round tripsflights on Saturday and Sunday to the Minneapolis st. Paul International airport utilizing a 19-seat Beech 1900turbo prop aircraft.
The Airport Commission isoptimistic that enplanements will rebound once consistent flight schedules are resumed. Airport Director Rhonda Chambers stated. 'The demand for consistent access to air service remains within our Region and it isour intent to secure a carrier who can meet those needs."
#### Charles Kirchner, *Respondent, v.*Abraham P. Black, *Appellant.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-94983, and Form S-3, No. 333-48890) of PMR Corporation of
our report dated June 21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of PMR Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2002.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
July 25, 2002
§ 540.26 Denial, revocation, suspension, or modification. ( a ) Prior to the denial, revocation, suspension, or modification of a Certificate (Casualty), the Commission shall advise the applicant of its intention to deny, revoke, suspend, or modify, and shall state the reasons therefor. If the applicant, within 20 days after the receipt of such advice, requests a hearing to show that the evidence of financial responsibility filed with the Commission does meet the rules of this subpart, such hearing shall be granted by the Commission, except that a Certificate (Casualty) shall become null and void upon cancellation or termination of evidence of insurance, surety bond, guaranty, or escrow account.
( b ) A Certificate (Casualty) may be denied, revoked, suspended, or modified for any of the following reasons: ( 1 ) Making any willfully false statement to the Commission in connection with an application for a Certificate (Casualty);
( 2 ) Circumstances whereby the party does not qualify as financially responsible in accordance with the requirements of the Commission;
( 3 ) Failure to comply with or respond to lawful inquiries, rules, regulations, or orders of the Commission pursuant to the rules of this subpart.
( c ) If the applicant, within 20 days after notice of the proposed denial, revocation, suspension, or modification under paragraph (b) of this section, requests a hearing to show that such denial, revocation, suspension, or modification should not take place, such hearing shall be granted by the Commission.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 21, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.
and subsidiaries on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements and Prospectus' of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-73954, 333-27761, 333-58466, and 333-76940) and the Registration Statement
and Prospectus of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on Form F-3 (File No. 333-58468).




/s/ Grant Thornton

Hong Kong
February 28, 2003
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 22, 1995 (85), Para 85.31 Calendar Wednesday Business Dispensed With]
[Page 1039]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.85.31  calendar wednesday business dispensed with

  On motion of Mr. LIVINGSTON, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That business in order for consideration on Wednesday, June 
28, 1995, under clause 7, rule XXIV, the Calendar Wednesday rule, be 
dispensed with.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOUND ON PAGES 3, 4 AND 5 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE OF
EACH PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,618
<SECURITIES>                                    25,289
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,083
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,950
<PP&E>                                           5,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          219,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,169
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,270
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,312
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 135 (Monday, July 16, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 38747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3473]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 38747]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-25 of July 5, 2007

                
Transfer of Funds from Prior Year Independent 
                States Account to the International Narcotics Control 
                and Law Enforcement Account To Support the Women's 
                Justice and Empowerment Initiative

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 
                amended (the ``Act''), I hereby determine that it is 
                necessary for the purposes of that Act that $1.8 
                million in prior year Independent States funds made 
                available under chapter 11 of part I of the Act be 
                transferred to, and consolidated with, funds made 
                available under chapter 8 of part I of the Act, and 
                such funds are hereby so transferred and consolidated.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, July 5, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-3473
Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 91.60-25 Exemption Certificate. ( a ) A vessel may be exempted by the Commandant from complying with certain requirements of the Convention under his administration upon request made in writing to him and transmitted via the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) When an exemption is granted to a vessel by the Commandant under and in accordance with the Convention, an Exemption Certificate describing such exemption shall be issued through the appropriate Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in addition to other required certificates.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 31, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|KEYCORP           | * 3A3         | Application by KeyCorp, Cleveland, Ohio,to retain, in a fiduciary capacity, 9.75% of the outstanding voting shares of Mechanics Financial Corporation, Mansfield, Ohio, pursuant to Section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us