alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-301.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ICELAND 

Amending the Agreement of June 14, 1995 

Effected by Exchange of 

Notes at Reykjavik March 1, 2002 

 

and 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Reykjavik August 14, 2006 and March 9, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ICELAND 

Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreements amending the agreement of 

 June 14, 1995. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Reykjavik 

 March 1, 2002; 

 Entered into force March 1, 2002. 

 And effected by exchange of notes at Reykjavik 

 August 14, 2006 and March 9, 2007; 

 Entered into force March 9, 2007. 
1
2
3
4
5
6

NOTE: Enclosure for this note will not be printed in this publication. Please refer to TIAS 12661 for text of enclosure.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1642 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1642

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 12 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) 
          to the products of Cambodia, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) Cambodia is now under democratic rule after 20 years of 
        undemocratic regimes and civil war, and is striving to rebuild 
        its market economy;
            (2) extension of unconditional most-favored-nation 
        treatment would assist Cambodia in developing its economy based 
        on free market principles and becoming competitive in the 
        global marketplace;
            (3) establishing normal commercial relations on a 
        reciprocal basis with Cambodia will promote United States 
        exports to the rapidly growing Southeast Asian region and 
        expand opportunities for United States business and investment 
        in the Cambodian economy; and
            (4) expanding bilateral trade relations that includes a 
        commercial agreement will promote further progress by Cambodia 
        on human rights and toward adoption of regional and world 
        trading rules and principles.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT TO THE PRODUCTS OF 
              CAMBODIA.

    (a) Harmonized Tariff Schedule Amendment.--General note 3(b) of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking 
``Kampuchea''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the effective date of a notice published in 
the Federal Register by the United States Trade Representative that a 
trade agreement obligating reciprocal most-favored-nation treatment 
between Cambodia and the United States has entered into force.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    The President shall submit to the Congress, not later than 18 
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report on the 
trade relations between the United States and Cambodia pursuant to the 
trade agreement described in section 2(b).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
. "

1.

.;L! LE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0095

CITY OF HELENA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

INNA VIKTOROVNA POSTOLNIKOVA,

Defendant and Appellant,

FILED

JUN 1 5 2021

Bowen Greenw000

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Monte na

ORDER

Counsel for the Appellant Inna Viktorovna Postolnikova filed a motion and brief

asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable

to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and

Anders v . California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Postolnikova was granted time

to file a response, but no response was filed.

The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2),

MCA, and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that

could be raised on direct appeal in Postolnikova's case.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to

Postolnikova personally.

DATED this 15 day of June, 2021.

Chief Justice

06/15/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0095
Justices

2
§ 54.30-3 Introduction. ( a ) Large conventional pressure vessels used to transport liquefied petroleum and natural gases, at “low temperatures” may often be difficult to thermally stress relieve. Where no other problem, such as corrosion exists, mechanical stress relief will be permitted for Class II-L pressure vessels.
( b ) Mechanical stress relief serves to cause small flaws, particularly in the weld zone, to yield plastically at the flaw tip resulting in a local relief of stress and a blunting of the crack tip. To achieve the maximum benefit from mechanical stress relief, it is necessary that the stresses so imposed be more severe than those expected in normal service life. At the same time, it is necessary that the stresses which are imposed are not so high as to result in appreciable deformation or general yielding.
( c ) The weld joint efficiencies as listed in table UW-12 of Section VIII of the BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) apply except that a minimum of spot radiography will be required. UW-12(c) of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC that permits omitting all radiography does not apply. Spot examination must follow UW-52 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC and, in addition, these vessels will be required to have radiographic examination of intersecting circumferential and longitudinal joints for a distance of at least 20 times the plate thickness from the junction. See § 54.25-8 on spot radiography.
( d ) Severe cold forming will not be permitted unless thermal stress relief is used. For example, parts of the vessels which are individually cold formed, such as heads, must be thermally stress relieved, where the extreme fiber strain measured at the surface exceeds 5 percent as determined by:
Percent strain = (65t/Rf)[1−(Rf/Ro)] where: t = Plate thickness. Rf = Final radius. Ro = Original radius (equals infinity for flat plate).
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58460, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65171, Oct. 31, 2008]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00055-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.T.H., a Child

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-06-00125-CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE RIOS 

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Granting 

Intervenor’s Plea to the Jurisdiction is AFFIRMED.

Costs are assessed against the party that incurred them.

SIGNED February 15, 2017.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
§ 71.65-10 Plans required for alterations of existing vessels. ( a ) In the event of alterations involving the safety of the vessel, the applicable plans shall be submitted for approval covering the proposed work, except as modified by § 71.55-1(b). The general scope of the plans shall be as noted in § 71.65-5.
( b ) [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 28, 2009

|Filer                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|PATRIOT FINANCIAL PARTNERS | CIC           | Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, GP, LLC, Patriot Financial Managers, L.P., and Messrs. Ira M. Lubert, W. Kirk Wycoff and James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to purchase up to 14.9 percent of Heritage Oakes Bancorp, parent of Heritage Bank, both in Paso Robles, CA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/27/2009
|Newspaper:                 | Not available
|Federal Register:          | 10/27/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ASIAN BK, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA | 2785477 | 05/11/2009 | 10/07/2009     | O         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.33-1 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart contains regulations concerning transfer of certain low-hazard materials to and from portable tanks on vessels
( b ) This subpart applies to the following portable tanks: ( 1 ) A DOT-specification 57 portable tank constructed on or before October 1, 1996, or a UN portable tank (see 49 CFR 173.32 and § 98.30-3).
( 2 ) A portable tank authorized under 49 CFR 176.340(b).
( 3 ) A portable tank approved by the Commandant under subpart 50.20 of this chapter.
( 4 ) An Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC), but restricted to those metal IBCs as described in § 98.30-6.
[CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37412, Sept. 11, 1990; 56 FR 13598, Apr. 3, 1991, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51046, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]
#### Frederick W. Pratt, *Respondent, v.*Beriah G. Underwood, *Appellant.*

Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either .party. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
**United States Department of Defense		Top Links			Subscribe-  Twitter
-  Facebook
-  Flickr
-  RSS
-  Widgets
-  E-Mail
			Secretary of Defense-  Speeches 
-  Messages 
-  Biography
			Press-  Today in DoD
-  News Releases
-  Press Advisories
-  Publications
-  Transcripts
			Photos-  Imagery Archive
-  Highlights
-  Photo Essays
-  Week in Photos
			DoD Info-  Post 9/11 GI Bill				Transferability
-  Community Relations
-  Stars & Stripes
-  Recovery Act
-  Site Map
*Speech Archive*****Months Available:**2013:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2012:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2011:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2010:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2009:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2008:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2007:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2006:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2005:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2004:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2003:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2002:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2001:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**2000:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**1999:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**1998:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**1997:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**1996:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec**1995:**JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec.Main Menu- Home
- Today in DOD
- About DOD    - Leaders
  - Biographies
  - Organization
  - Mission
  - History
  - Frequently Asked Questions
  - Available jobs with DOD
- Top Issues    - Afghanistan
  - Sexual Assault Prevention
  - Warrior Care
  - Cyber Security
  - Defense Strategic Guidance
- News    - DOD News Page
  - Today in DOD
  - News Releases
  - Press Advisories
  - News Transcripts
  - Publications
  - Speeches
  - Casualty Status (PDF)
  - Contracts
  - Casualty Releases
  - Special Reports
  - AFPS Articles
- Photos/Videos    - The Pentagon Channel
  - Lead Photo Archive
  - Photo Essays
  - News Photos
  - Week In Photos
  - DefenseImagery.mil
  - Videos
  - DOD/Military Seals
- Military/DoD Websites    - U.S. Army
  - U.S. Marine Corps
  - U.S. Navy
  - U.S. Air Force
  - National Guard
  - U.S. Coast Guard
  - All DOD Sites
  - Military/DOD Social Media Sites
  - Register A Site
  - Unified Combatant Commands
- Contact Us    - Frequently Asked Questions
  - Website Feedback
Additional Links- Home
- Today in DOD
- About DOD
- Top Issues
- News
- Photos/Videos
- Military/DoD Websites
- Contact Us
- Inspector General
- Privacy & Security
- Link Disclaimer
- Recovery Act
- FOIA
- USA.gov
- No FEAR Act
- Plain Writing Act of 2010
- Accessibility/Section 508
- Join the Military
- Careers
- Web Policy
- Websites
							Stay Connected-  RSS Feeds
-  Email
-  Widgets
-  DOD Live Blog
-  Facebook
-  Twitter
-  YouTube
-  Flickr
MORE SOCIAL MEDIA SITES »**
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.
    Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).
    Date: July 31, 2007.
    Location: Holiday Inn Louisville-Downtown, 120 West Broadway, 
Louisville, KY 40202, (502) 582-2241.
    Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m.
    Agenda: The Board will hear briefings on the status of both the 
funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund, and be provided updates of various inland 
waterways projects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark R. Pointon, Headquarters, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CO, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20314-1000; Ph: (202) 761-4258.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bown,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-3151 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
§ 92.05-5 Woodwork insulated from heated surfaces. ( a ) Internal combustion engine exhausts, boiler and galley uptakes, and similar sources of ignition shall be kept clear of and suitably insulated from any woodwork or other combustible matter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2580

JESSE R. LANCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND TAXATION; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-98-2762-4-08BD)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 1, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Jesse R. Lance, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Dargan McMaster, TOMPKINS

& MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina; Alice Lizbeth Ronk, Brian P.

Kaufman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jesse Lance seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal of the final judgment for lack of

jurisdiction because Lance’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded sixty days, if the United States is a

party, after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order

to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district

court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This

appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v.

Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

September 27, 1999. Lance’s notice of appeal was filed on November

29, 1999. Because Lance failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal of the judgment.

We affirm the district court’s denial of Lance’s motion for

reconsideration on the reasoning of the district court. See Lance

v. South Carolina Dep’t of Revenue, No. CA-98-2762-4-08BD (D.S.C.

Nov. 4, 1999). We grant the South Carolina Department of Revenue

and Taxation’s motion to file its informal brief out of time. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3446]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 17, 2007 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 38999]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27837; Airspace Docket No. 07-ACE-5]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Bolivar, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date and 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Bolivar, MO and corrects the 
airport reference point coordinates.

DATES: Effective Date: The direct final rule published at 72 FR 23768, 
May 1, 2007, is confirmed to be 0901 UTC, August 30, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT 
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on May 1, 2007 (72 
FR 23768). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on August 30, 2007. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date. The airport reference point coordinates are 
corrected to lat. 37[deg]35'46'' N., long. 93[deg]20'52'' W.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on June 27, 2007.
Donald R. Smith,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07-3446 Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M