alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 129 (Friday, July 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37046-37047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management


Steens Mountain Advisory Council--Notice of Renewal

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal of the Steens Mountain Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 9(a)(2) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, Public Law 92-463. Notice 
is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) has 
renewed the Bureau of Land Management's Steens Mountain Advisory 
Council.
    The purpose of the Council will be to advise the Secretary in 
managing and promoting cooperative management of the Steens Mountain 
Cooperative Management and Protection Area.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Herrema, National Landscape 
Conservation System (171), Bureau of Land Management, 1620 L Street, 
NW.,

[[Page 37047]]

Room 301 LS, Washington, DC 20236, telephone (202) 452-7787.

Certification Statement

    I hereby certify that the renewal of the Steens Mountain Advisory 
Council is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the 
Secretary's responsibilities to manage the lands, resources, and 
facilities administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

    Dated: June 22, 2007.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 07-3276 Filed 7-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 8, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00585

- CV

John Bookman , Appellant

v.

Cross Creek North Realty, LLC , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES G OODW IN, BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgm ent sig ned by the tr i a l court on November 2, 2021 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that John Bookman has not prosecuted his appeal and did

not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal

for wa nt o f prosecution. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court

and in the court below.
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007

135010

LORENZO C. TOWNSEND, #201112

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

FRANCIS A. KRCMARIK,

Defendant-Appellee. Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

SC: 135010 CoA: 279722

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of October 8, 2007, the Cl erk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007
Clerk
98-2217.

#### State ex rel. Ambrosia v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

In Prohibition. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

JOE LEWIS BROWN, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.  No. 01-7951

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge.

(CA-01-778)

Submitted: March 13, 2002

Decided: February 10, 2003

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Joe Lewis Brown, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Joe Lewis Brown appeals the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely because it

was filed beyond the one-year limitation period of 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d) (2000). Because the district court sua sponte dismissed

Brown’s § 2254 petition as untimely without affording him notice or

an opportunity to be heard and because it is not indisputably clear

from the district court record that the petition is untimely and cannot

be salvaged by equitable tolling principles or any of the circumstances

enumerated in § 2244(d)(1), we grant a certificate of appealability,

vacate the district court’s order, and remand to the district court for

additional proceedings consistent with Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701

(4th Cir. 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED

2 BROWN v. ANGELONE
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.05-10 Conditions of permit.

(a) The permit will state upon its face the conditions under which it is issued and whether or not the vessel is permitted to carry freight or passengers.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interstate Bakeries
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James R. Elsesser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ James R. Elsesser
-------------------------------
James R. Elsesser
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

August 22, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interstate Bakeries Corporation and will be retained by Interstate
Bakeries Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 2, 2012

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|OLD NATIONAL BANCORP | * 3A5         | Old National Bancorp, Evansville, Indiana, to merge with Indiana Community Bancorp, Columbus, Indiana. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/02/2012
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 07/02/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST DELTA BK, MARKED TREE, ARKANSAS | 713140 | 02/27/2012 | 05/17/2012     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending December 10, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.16 S. 523--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1107]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.16  s. 523--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the bill of the Senate (S. 523) to amend the Colorado 
River Basin Salinity Control Act to authorize additional measures to 
carry out the control of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a cost-
effective manner, and for other purposes.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DICKEY, announced that two-thirds of 
those present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSIAH DAVON BAILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 140 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of July, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.10 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 826-827]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. MILLER of 
California:

       In section 2(a) (page 2, beginning at line 3), strike 
     ``Within'' and all that follows through ``without 
     reimbursement'', and insert ``Upon the provision of 
     consideration by the State of Arkansas in accordance with 
     subsection (c) within 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
     convey to the State of Arkansas''.
       Amend section 2(c) (page 3, beginning at line 3) to read as 
     follows:
       (c) Consideration.--
       (1) Consideration required.--The Secretary of the Interior 
     shall require that, as consideration for any property 
     conveyed by the Secretary under subsection (a), the State of 
     Arkansas shall--
       (A) pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair 
     market value of the property conveyed by the Secretary under 
     subsection (a), reduced in accordance with paragraph (3); or
       (B) convey to the United States real property that the 
     Secretary deterimes--
       (i) has a fair market value not less than an amount equal 
     to the fair market value of the property conveyed by the 
     Secretary under subsection (a), reduced in accordance with 
     paragraph (3); and
       (ii) is useful for promoting fish restoration and 
     management.
       (2) Appraisal required.--The Secretary shall determine fair 
     market value of prop

[[Page 827]]

     erty for purposes of this subsection after considering an 
     appraisal of the property prepared for the Secretary after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (3) Reduction of fair market value of property conveyed.--
     For purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B)(i) of paragraph 
     (1), the fair market value of property conveyed under 
     subsection (a) shall be reduced by the value of any capital 
     improvements to the property that were made by the State of 
     Arkansas before the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (4) Deposit of payment.--
       (A) Deposit.--Amounts received by the United States as 
     payment under this subsection shall be deposited into the 
     Sport Fish Restoration Account of the Aquatic Resources Trust 
     Fund established by section 9504 of the Internal Revenue Code 
     of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9504), commonly referred to as the Wallop-
     Breaux Fund.
       (B) Limitation on use of deposits for purposes not related 
     to fish restoration and management.--Section 9504(b)(2)(B) of 
     the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9504(b)(2)(B)) 
     does not apply to amounts deposited under this paragraph.

It was decided in the

Yeas

96

negative

Nays

315
```
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.558 Special requirements for phosphoric acid. A phosphoric acid containment system must be: ( a ) Lined with natural rubber or neoprene;
( b ) Lined with a material approved for phosphoric acid tanks by the Commandant (CG-ENG); or
( c ) Made of a stainless steel that resists corrosion by phosphoric acid.
Note:
“Phosphoric acid”, as defined in § 153.2, includes phosphoric acid, superphosphoric acid, and aqueous solutions of phosphoric acid.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40042, Sept. 29, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000702904
<NAME> AMBANC CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          14,868
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             793
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,699
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     98,979
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,797
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            40,334
<LOANS>                                        368,346
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,033
<DEPOSITS>                                     488,281
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,811
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,012
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,663
<COMMON>                                        23,726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 554,033
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,321
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,971
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   222
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,608
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,257
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,355
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,253
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,444
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,444
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                        876
<LOANS-PAST>                                       960
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    52
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,911
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      146
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,179
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,771
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,408
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 3, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FRANKLIN SVG BK, FARMINGTON, MAINE | 228000 | 10/17/2011 | 02/03/2012     | O         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-2204.

#### State v. Scott.

Cuyahoga App. No. 74805. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Eat at Joe's Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Joseph Fiore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

|                 |                                                                            
|---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                
|December 6, 2013 | /s/ Joseph Fiore                                                           
|                 | Joseph Fiore, Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1503.301 Warning notices and letters of correction. ( a ) If TSA determines that a violation or an alleged violation of a TSA requirement does not require the assessment of a civil penalty, an appropriate official of the TSA may take administrative action in disposition of the case.
( b ) An administrative action under this section does not constitute a formal adjudication of the matter, and may be taken by issuing the alleged violator— ( 1 ) A “Warning Notice” that recites available facts and information about the incident or condition and indicates that it may have been a violation; or
( 2 ) A “Letter of Correction” that confirms the TSA decision in the matter and states the necessary corrective action the alleged violator has taken or agrees to take. If the agreed corrective action is not fully completed, legal enforcement action may be taken.
( c ) The issuance of a Warning Notice or Letter of Correction is not subject to appeal under this part.
( d ) In the case of a public transportation agency that is determined to be in violation of a TSA requirement, an appropriate TSA official will seek correction of the violation through a written “Notice of Noncompliance” to the public transportation agency giving the public transportation agency reasonable opportunity to correct the violation or propose an alternative means of compliance acceptable to TSA.
( e ) TSA will not take legal enforcement action against a public transportation agency under subpart E unless it has provided the Notice of Noncompliance described in paragraph (d) of this section and the public transportation agency fails to correct the violation or propose an alternative means of compliance acceptable to TSA within the timeframe provided in the notice.
( f ) TSA will not initiate civil enforcement action for violations of administrative and procedural requirements pertaining to the application for, and the expenditure of, funds awarded pursuant to transportation security grant programs under Public Law 110-53.