alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 16, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|LUZERNE BANK      | * Branch       | Luzerne Bank, Luzerne, PA, to establish a branch office located Routes 118 and 415, Dallas, PA. | Newspaper:08/28/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 08/28/2008    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1110.2 Opening of proceeding. ( a ) The Board may open a rulemaking proceeding on its own motion. In doing so, it may consider the recommendations of other agencies of the United States and of other persons.
( b ) Any person may petition the Board to open a proceeding to issue, amend, or repeal a rule.
( c ) Each petition seeking the institution of a proceeding, filed under this section must: ( 1 ) Be submitted to the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of Proceedings, Surface Transportation Board, Washington DC;
( 2 ) Set forth the text or substance of the rule or amendment proposed or specify the rule that the petitioner wants to have repealed or modified;
( 3 ) Explain the interest of the petitioner in the action requested; and
( 4 ) Contain any information and arguments available to the petitioner to support the action sought and may detail any environmental, energy, or small business considerations.
( d ) In rail cases, the Board will grant or deny a petition within 120 days of its receipt.
( e ) If the Board determines that a petition contains adequate justification, it will open a rulemaking proceeding pursuant to § 1110.3 and will notify the petitioner of its action.
( f ) If the Board determines that the petition does not contain adequate justification for opening a rulemaking proceeding, the petition will be denied, with a brief statement of the grounds for denial, and the petitioner will be notified of the Board's action.
( g ) If a petition under this section concerning a common carrier by railroad is granted, the Board will proceed as soon as it is practicable. If the petition is denied, the Board will publish a statement of the reasons for the denial in the Federal Register.
[47 FR 49556, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 74 FR 52907, Oct. 15, 2009; 81 FR 8854, Feb. 23, 2016; 84 FR 12944, Apr. 3, 2019]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending July 14, 2012

----

Forms            Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the Suspicious Activity Report (FR 2230).            -Approved, July 9, 2012            Monetary and Financial Policy            Term Deposit Facility -- TDF auction of $3 billion in 28-day term deposits on July 16, 2012.            -Announced, July 11, 2012            Enforcement            Tower Financial Corporation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, and Tower Bank & Trust Company -- written agreement dated April 23, 2010, terminated July 10, 2012.            -Announced, July 12, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
EXHIBIT 11
 COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
  Year ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005(In thousands of U.S. dollars except per share information)Net income (loss) from continuing operations
    
    $
    (36,220
    )
    
    $
    (9,247
    )
    
    $
    (125,537
    )
    
    $
    39,898
    
    
    $
    62,673Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax
    
    
    135,654
    
    
    
    144,138
    
    
    
    15,540
    
    
    
    (141,503
    )
    
    
    (388,084
    )Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
    
    $
    99,434
    
    
    $
    134,891
    
    
    $
    (109,997
    )
    
    $
    (101,605
    )
    
    $
    (325,412
    )Basic net income (loss) per common shareContinuing operations
    
    $
    (0.65
    )
    
    $
    (0.12
    )
    
    $
    (1.68
    )
    
    $
    0.48
    
    
    $
    0.68Discontinued operations
    
    
    2.41
    
    
    
    1.93
    
    
    
    0.21
    
    
    
    (1.68
    )
    
    
    (4.19
    )Net income (loss)
    
    $
    1.77
    
    
    $
    1.81
    
    
    $
    (1.47
    )
    
    $
    (1.20
    )
    
    $
    (3.51
    )Diluted net income (loss) per common shareContinuing operations
    
    $
    (0.65
    )
    
    $
    (0.12
    )
    
    $
    (1.68
    )
    
    $
    0.48
    
    
    $
    0.68Discontinued operations
    
    
    2.41
    
    
    
    1.93
    
    
    
    0.21
    
    
    
    (1.68
    )
    
    
    (4.19
    )Net income (loss)
    
    $
    1.77
    
    
    $
    1.81
    
    
    $
    (1.47
    )
    
    $
    (1.20
    )
    
    $
    (3.51
    )Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(in thousands)
    
    
    56,194
    
    
    
    74,620
    
    
    
    74,907
    
    
    
    84,596
    
    
    
    92,637Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in
thousands)
    
    
    56,194
    
    
    
    74,620
    
    
    
    74,907
    
    
    
    84,596
    
    
    
    92,637
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 20, 2007

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                  
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. | 4c8            | Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, to acquire up to a 15% additional interest in Bingham, Osborn & Scarborough LLC, San Francisco, California, pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act and to Sections 225.23 and 225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.5 Communications]
[Page 699]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.5  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       876. A letter from the Secretary of Energy, transmitting a 
     draft of proposed legislation to authorize the Department of 
     Energy to sell Eklutna and Snettisham projects administered 
     by the Alaska Power Administration, and for other purposes; 
     jointly, to the Committees on Resources, Commerce, Ways and 
     Means, the Judiciary, Transportation and Infrastructure, 
     Government Reform and Oversight, and the Budget.
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF SEWELL AND COMPANY, P.A.



The Board of Directors of
Safe Technologies International, Inc.:

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
of Safe Technologies International, Inc. on Form S-8 filed with the Securities 
and Exchange Commission on September 8, 1998 of our report dated March 9, 1999 
relating to the financial statements of Safe Technologies International, Inc. 
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, appears in this Annual 
Report on Form 10-KSB of Safe Technologies International, Inc. for the year 
ended December 31, 1998

    
SEWELL AND COMPANY, P.A.


Hollywood, Florida
March 9, 1999
#### Sylvester Ploof *v.*Henry W. Putnam.

May Term, 1910.

Present: Rowell, C. J., Munson, Watson, Haselton, and Powers, JJ.

Opinion filed May 30, 1910.

*New Trial*— Newly *Discovered Evidence*— Due *Diligence*— Suffi*ciency of Affidavit.*

The statement, in an affidavit in support of a petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, that diligent search was made, is insufficient, for that is merely the opinion of the affiant, whereas the facts should be stated from which it can be judged whether there was due diligence.

Petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, preferred to the Supreme Court for Chittenden County at its May Term, 1910, and then heard on the petition and supporting affidavits.

*Batchelder & Bates*for the petitioner.

*Martin S. Vilas*and *Goioles & Moulton*for the petitionee.

Rowell, C. J.

Final judgment having gone against the defendant at a former term, the case now comes before us on his petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

The only evidence presented, to show diligence on his part to discover the evidence relied upon before the trial below, is contained in the affidavit of Mr. Braisted, who was employed by the defendant to look up the evidence and prepare the ease for trial. He says that he spent several days in procuring and endeavoring to procure witnesses, and saw various and all persons of whom he could learn by diligent inquiry that might know the facts of the case, and under the direction of counsel obtained all the evidence, and made the best preparation, he could for the trial, but was unable to find any one who knew the things stated *495in the other affidavits attached to the petition, though he made diligent search and inquiry.

But this is not enough, as we have often held, for we can not act upon his opinion of what was diligence. He should have stated facts that would enable us to judge of the matter, and none are stated. *Comoli*v. *State,*78 Vt. 423, 63 Atl. 186; *Hemmenway*v. *Lincoln,*82 Vt. 465, 73 Atl. 1073.

*Petition dismissed with costs.*
Leslie C. Abbott 

Southwest Airlines Co. 

Senior Attorney 

919 18th Street, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, DC 20006 

202.263.6285 

202.263.6291 - fax 

leslie.abbott@wnco.com 

April 15, 2015 

VIA EMAIL AND REGULATIONS.GOV 

Mr. Brett Kruger 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Southwest® 

Re: Application of Southwest Airlines for DEN-PVR Service; 

Docket osT-2015- DO ~'f 

Dear Mr. Kruger: 

This letter is to confirm that Southwest Airlines Co. ("Southwest") has polled all of 

the carriers on the service list attached to the above-referenced application, and all 

carriers have responded that they have no objections. Accordingly, Southwest requests 

that the exemption authority requested in the application be granted as soon as 

possible. 

cc: Hon. Susan Kurland , DOT 

Paul Gretch, DOT 

Brian Hedberg, DOT 

Reese Davidson, DOT 

Robert Finamore, DOT 

Todd Homan, DOT 

Peter Irvine, DOT 

All parties on the Service List 

Respectfully submitted,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVIALL,
INC.'S THIRD QUARTER 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH THIRD QUARTER 1997 FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,934
<INVENTORY>                                     73,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,388
<PP&E>                                          36,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,919
<BONDS>                                         31,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           198
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,797
<SALES>                                        288,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,012
<CGS>                                          215,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  215,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,129
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,023
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 95.17-5 Quantity of foam required. ( a ) *Area protected.* ( 1 ) For machinery and similar spaces, the system shall be so designed and arranged as to spread a blanket of foam over the entire tank top or bilge of the space protected. The arrangement of piping shall be such as to give a uniform distribution over the entire area protected.
( 2 ) Where an installation is made to protect an oil fired boiler installation on a flat which is open to or can drain to the lower engineroom or other space, both the flat and the lower space shall be protected simultaneously. The flat shall be fitted with suitable coamings on all openings other than deck drains to properly restrain the oil and foam at that level. Other installations of a similar nature will be considered in a like manner.
( 3 ) Where a system is installed to protect a tank, it shall be so designed and arranged as to spread a blanket of foam over the entire liquid surface of the tank within the range of usual trim. The arrangement of piping shall be such as to give a uniform distribution over the entire area protected.
( b ) *Rate of application.* ( 1 ) For spaces other than tanks, the rate of discharge to foam outlets protecting the hazard shall be at least as set forth in this paragraph. ( i ) For chemical foam systems with stored “A” and “B” solutions, a total of at least 1.6 gallons per minute of the two solutions shall be discharged for each 10 square feet of area protected.
( ii ) For other types of foam systems, the water rate to the dry powder generators or air foam production equipment shall be at least 1.6 gallons per minute for each 10 square feet of area protected.
( 2 ) For tanks, the rate of discharge to foam outlets protecting the hazard shall be as set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, except that the value of 1 gallon per minute shall be substituted in both cases for the value of 1.6 gallons per minute.
( c ) *Supply of foam producing material.* ( 1 ) There shall be provided a quantity of foam producing material sufficient to operate the equipment at the discharge rate specified in paragraph (b) of this section for a period of at least 3 minutes for spaces other than tanks, and for at least 5 minutes for tanks.
( d ) *Separate supply of foam agent.* A separate supply of foam agent need not be provided for each space protected. The total available supply shall be at least sufficient for the space requiring the greatest amount.
( e ) *Water supply for required pumps.* Where pumps are required, the water supply shall be from outside the space protected and shall in no way be dependent upon power from the space protected.
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 13, 2004                                      /s/ Jeffery Strickland
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jeffery Strickland
                                                         Chief Financial Officer




         The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18
U.S.C.ss.1350 and not for any other purpose.


                                       18
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 14, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Same *v.*Thomas Bowers, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
#### § 11.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 11.101(i) or exempted under § 11.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.