alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted October 30, 1995, motion for sanctions denied;

reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 3, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Susan A. Michl, Claimant. BEVERLY ENTERPRISES and Construction State Service Company, *Petitioners, v.*Susan A. MICHL, *Respondent.*

(WCB 93-04959; CA A87433)

908 P2d 849

Jerald P. Keene argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch, MacKenzie, Healey & Wilson.

David C. Force argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*487PER CURIAM

Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding the compensability of claimant’s knee condition and related surgery. The primary dispute concerns whether claimant’s condition is the result of a combination of a work injury and a preexisting condition.

Resolution of this case involves an interpretation of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B), which was amended by the legislature in 1995. Or Laws 1995, ch 332. The amendments are applicable to all cases still in administrative proceedings or on review. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995). We remand the case to the Board for reconsideration in the light of the amendments. Accordingly, we deny claimant’s motion for sanctions made pursuant to ORS 656.390.

Motion for sanctions denied; reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Marcus Flores Alcantar

, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 24878A.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00270

- CR * August 21 , 2015

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

FOR PUBLICATION 

September 22, 2016 

v No. 325662 

Macomb Circuit Court 

IHAB MASALMANI, LC No. 2009-005244-FC 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: BORRELLO, P.J., and MARKEY and RIORDAN, JJ. 

BORRELLO, P.J. (concurring). 

 I concur in the result reached by my colleagues solely because I am bound by this 

Court’s flawed reasoning in People v Hyatt, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2016). I 

write separately this one time to briefly express my belief that contrary to the flawed analysis 

contained throughout Hyatt and for the reasons set forth in People v Skinner, 312 Mich App 15, 

20; 877 NW2d 482 (2015), defendant possesses a Sixth Amendment right to choose whether he 

will be sentenced by a judge or a jury. However, recognizing that I am bound by Hyatt, I 

therefore must concur with the decision reached by my colleagues in this matter. 

/s/ Stephen L. Borrello
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 7, 2011

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|NEXTIER INCORPORATED | CIC         | Notice of Change in Bank Control by Mark A. Snyder, Kittanning, Pennsylvania, to acquire up to 13.74% of the voting shares of NexTier,Inc., Butler, Pennsylvania | Newspaper:05/13/2011Federal Register:05/16/2011
|Newspaper:           | 05/13/2011 
|Federal Register:    | 05/16/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1022.1 Scope and purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish a method to adjust for inflation the civil monetary penalties provided by law within the jurisdiction of the Board, in conformity with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-410, 104 Stat. 890 (codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public Law 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, and further amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Public Law 114-74, 129 Stat. 599. These penalties shall be subject to review and adjustment annually using the method specified in this part.

[81 FR 72543, Oct. 20, 2016]
#### § 130.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes prevention, containment and response planning requirements of the Department of Transportation applicable to transportation of oil by motor vehicles and rolling stock.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.14 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1043]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.14  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. SANDERS:

       Page 4, line 26, strike ``$26,500,000'' and insert 
     ``$1,000,000''.
       Page 5, line 9, strike ``$79,000,000'' and insert ``$0''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

90

negative

Nays

329
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 28, 1995 (51), Para 51.10 Message from the President--Native Hawaiians Health Care]
[Page 507]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.51.10  message from the president--native hawaiians health care

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. McINNIS, laid before the House a message 
from the President, which was read as follows:

To the Congress of the United States:
  I transmit herewith the Report on the Health Care for Native Hawaiians 
Program, as required by section 11 of the Native Hawaiians Health Care 
Act of 1988, as amended (Public Law 102-396; 42 U.S.C. 11701 et. seq.).
                                                   William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, March 27, 1995.

  By unanimous consent, the message, together with the accompanying 
papers, was referred to the Committee on Commerce.
```
#### § 77.35-1 Application.

This subpart, except § 77.35-90, applies to each vessel that is on an international voyage and is contracted for on or after November 23, 1992. Each vessel that is on an international voyage and is contracted for before November 23, 1992, must satisfy § 77.35-90.

[CGD 86-036, 57 FR 48325, Oct. 23, 1992]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 15-20382 

 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts 

PAUL NICOLETTI, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________/ 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

 On February 7, 2023, Defendant filed an Emergency Motion for 

Compassionate Release/Reduction in Sentence [ECF No. 264]. 

 The Court sets the following briefing schedule: 

1. Government’s response brief must be filed by: February 21, 2023; 

and 

2. Defendant’s Reply brief must be filed by: March 7, 2023. 

ORDERED. 

 s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

 Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: February 10, 2023 

Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 265, PageID.4398 Filed 02/10/23 Page 1 of 1
DHR-2013.9.27-EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1


Danaher Corporation
Description of Non-Management Director Compensation Arrangements


Each non-management director receives:
 
		
	•
	an annual cash retainer of $100,000, paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service;        


		
	•
	if a director attends more than twenty (20) Board and Board committee meetings in aggregate during a calendar year, such director will receive a cash meeting fee of $2,000 for each Board and committee meeting attended during such year in excess of such threshold, paid in aggregate following completion of such year;


		
	•
	an annual equity award with a target award value of $140,000, divided equally between options and RSUs.  The target award value attributable to RSUs will be translated into a number of RSUs using the average closing price of Danaher’s common stock over the 15 trading-day trading period ending on the seventh business day before the grant date (rounded up to the nearest five).  The target award value attributable to stock options will be translated into a number of stock options assuming an option value equal to 40% of such average closing price (rounded up to the nearest ten).  The stock options will be immediately exercisable upon grant.  The RSUs will vest upon the earlier of (1) the first anniversary of the grant date, or (2) the date of, and immediately prior to, the next annual meeting of Danaher’s shareholders following the grant date, but the underlying shares are not issued until the earlier of the director’s death or the first day of the seventh month following the director’s retirement from the Board; and


		
	•
	reimbursement for Danaher-related out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expenses. 




In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $25,000, the chair of the Compensation Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $20,000, the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $15,000 and the lead independent director receives an annual cash retainer of $15,000, in each case paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service.


Each non-management director can elect to defer all or a part of the cash director fees that he or she receives with respect to a particular year under the Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, which is a sub-plan under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.  Amounts deferred under the plan are converted into a particular number of phantom shares of Danaher Common Stock, calculated based on the closing price of Danaher’s Common Stock on the date that such quarterly fees would otherwise have been paid.  A director may elect to have his or her plan balance distributed upon cessation of Board service, or one, two, three, four or five years after cessation of Board service.  All distributions from the plan are in the form of shares of Danaher Common Stock.





1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0082

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA JAMES HOWELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2022

09/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0082
#### § 1100.3 Liberal construction.

The rules will be construed liberally to secure just, speedy and inexpensive determination of the issues presented.
#### Mary A. Squire, *Respondent, v.*Laura Peck and Cornelia Peck, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Board-man, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 7, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 59.10-10 Corroded surfaces. ( a ) Corroded surfaces in the calking edges of circumferential seams may be built up by welding to the original thickness under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The thickness of the original metal to be built up between the rivet holes and the calking edge must not be less than one-fourth of the diameter of the rivet hole, and the portion of the calking edge to be thus reinforced must not exceed 30 inches in length in a circumferential direction.
( 2 ) In all repairs to circumferential seams by welding, the rivets must be removed over the portions to be welded for a distance of at least 6 inches beyond the repaired portion.
( 3 ) After repairs are made the rivet holes must be reamed before the rivets are redriven.
( b ) It is not permissible to build up or reinforce a grooved or corroded area of unstayed internal surfaces by means of welding, except that widely scattered pit holes may be built up by welding.
( c ) Where external corrosion has reduced the thickness of flat plates around hand holes to an extent of not more than 40 percent of the original thickness and for a distance not exceeding 2 inches from the edge of the hole, the plate may be built up by welding.
( d ) Where stayed sheets have corroded to a depth not exceeding 40 percent of their original thickness, they may be reinforced or built up by welding. Where the staybolts are fitted with riveted heads, the staybolts in the reinforced area must be renewed, but where the staybolts are fitted with nuts, the nuts may be removed and after reinforcing has been applied; collars may be welded around the staybolts in lieu of the nuts. Such reinforced areas must not exceed 400 square inches nor more than 30 inches in one direction. Two such areas in any one plate may be reinforced provided that the distance between the reinforced surfaces is not less than 30 inches.
( e ) When the corroded portion of a staybolted surface exceeds 400 square inches, it is permissible to make repairs by cutting out the defective portion and replacing it with a new plate, the edges of the new plate to be welded in position. In such cases, new staybolts must be fitted, and where welding is performed through a line of staybolts, welded collars must be used to attach the staybolts.
( f ) Eroded seams of welded pressure vessels may be repaired by rewelding the wasted portion. The wasted section of the seam must be excavated sufficiently by grinding, flame or arc gouging or chipping to ensure proper weld penetration. Rewelded seams must be nondestructively tested in accordance with Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference, see § 59.01-2).
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18887, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65189, Oct. 31, 2008]
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.2 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.3 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.4 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.5 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.6 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.7 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.8 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.9 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.10 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.11 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.12 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:15-cr-20339-RHC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 06/09/15 PageID.13 Page 13 of 13
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 25, 1995 (73), Para 73.5 Motion to Instruct Conferees--H.R. 483]
[Page 817]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.73.5  motion to instruct conferees--h.r. 483

  Mr. DOGGETT moved that the managers on the part of the House at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on H.R. 483, be 
instructed to resolve the differences between the House's eight and one-
half year program and the Senate's 5 year program of medicare select 
policies, within the scope of the conference, in light of the changes in 
Medicare (the program that medicare select policies supplement) to 
increase beneficiary cost-sharing and to limit choice of provider as 
contemplated in this year's budget process.
  After debate,
  By unanimous consent, the previous question was ordered on the motion 
to instruct the managers on the part of the House.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS announced that the nays had it.
  Mr. DOGGETT objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

197

When there appeared

Nays

224
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-12103-MFL-EAS

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address

76.112.9.228,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff has settled this matter with John Doe

(“Defendant”). Pursuant to the settlement agreement’s terms, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily

dismisses Defendant from this action with prejudice. John Doe was assigned the IP address

76.112.9.228. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendant John Doe has neither answered

Plaintiff’s Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment.

Consistent herewith Plaintiff consents to the Court having its case closed for

administrative purposes.

Dated: August 12, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti

pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Suite #433

Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Phone: (248) 203-7800

Attorney for Plaintiff

2:15-cv-12103-MFL-EAS Doc # 6 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 56
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 12, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of

record and interested parties through this system.

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti_______

Paul J. Nicoletti

2:15-cv-12103-MFL-EAS Doc # 6 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 57
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Gregory S. Lang, Chief Executive Officer of Integrated
Device Technology, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Gregory S. Lang    
|                      |  | Gregory S. Lang        
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 64.19 External pressure. ( a ) A tank without a vacuum breaker must be designed to withstand an external pressure of 71 ⁄ 2 psig or more.
( b ) A tank with a vacuum breaker must be designed to withstand an external pressure of 3 psig or more.
#### Thomas Maloney, *Appellant, v.*The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,033
<PP&E>                                       3,999,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                 310,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,154,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                     1,807,923
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,154,098
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,453)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,575
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>