alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 78.21-1 Data required. For each ocean and coastwise vessel of 1,600 gross tons and over, the following apply: ( a ) The following maneuvering information must be prominently displayed in the pilothouse on a fact sheet: ( 1 ) For full and half speed, a turning circle diagram to port and starboard that shows the time and the distance of advance and transfer required to alter the course 90 degrees with maximum rudder angle and constant power settings.
( 2 ) The time and distance to stop the vessel from full and half speed while maintaining approximately the initial heading with minimum application of rudder.
( 3 ) For each vessel with a fixed propeller, a table of shaft revolutions per minute for a representative range of speeds.
( 4 ) For each vessel with a controllable pitch propeller a table of control settings for a representative range of speeds.
( 5 ) For each vessel that is fitted with an auxiliary device to assist in maneuvering, such as a bow thruster, a table of vessel speeds at which the auxiliary device is effective in maneuvering the vessel.
( b ) The maneuvering information must be provided in the normal load and normal light condition with normal trim for a particular condition of loading assuming the following— ( 1 ) Calm weather—wind 10 knots or less, calm sea;
( 2 ) No current;
( 3 ) Deep water conditions—water depth twice the vessel's draft or greater; and
( 4 ) Clean hull.
( c ) At the bottom of the fact sheet, the following statement must appear: Warning The response of the (name of the vessel) may be different from those listed above if any of the following conditions, upon which the maneuvering information is based, are varied: (1) Calm weather—wind 10 knots or less, calm sea; (2) No current; (3) Water depth twice the vessel's draft or greater; (4) Clean hull; and (5) Intermediate drafts or unusual trim.
( d ) The information on the fact sheet must be: ( 1 ) Verified six months after the vessel is placed in service; or
( 2 ) Modified six months after the vessel is placed into service and verified within three months thereafter.
( e ) The information that appears on the fact sheet may be obtained from: ( 1 ) Trial trip observations;
( 2 ) Model tests;
( 3 ) Analytical calculations;
( 4 ) Simulations;
( 5 ) Information established from another vessel of similar hull form, power, rudder and propeller; or
( 6 ) Any combination of the above. The accuracy of the information in the fact sheet required is that attainable by ordinary shipboard navigation equipment.
( f ) The requirements for information for fact sheets for specialized craft such as semi-submersibles, hydrofoils, hovercraft and other vessels of unusual design will be specified on a case by case basis.
[CGD 73-78, 40 FR 2689, Jan. 15, 1975, as amended by CGD 79-165a, 45 FR 64189, Sept. 29, 1980]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Alpine County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on Thursday, July 17, 2007 at 18:00 at the Diamond Valley School for business meetings. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Payment to States) and expenditure of Title II funds. The meetings are open to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, July 17, 2007 at 18:00 hours.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Diamond Valley School, 35 Hawkside Drive, Markleeville, California 96120. Send written comments to Franklin Pemberton, Alpine County RAC coordinator, c/o USDA Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe N.F., Carson Ranger District 1536 So. Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alpine Co. RAC Coordinator, Franklin Pemberton at (775) 884-8150; or Gary Schiff, Carson District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, at (775) 884-8100, or electronically to                         *fpemberton@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Meeting is open to the public. Council discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members. However, persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters to the attention of the council may file written statements with the Council staff before and after the meeting.

Dated: July 3, 2007.

Edward Monnig,

Forest Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe N.F.

[FR Doc. 07-3383 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
98-1595.

#### State ex rel. Cooper & Tire Rubber Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97APD04-591. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 24, 2012

----

Testimony and Statements            The European Economic and Financial Situation -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on the European economic and financial situation.            -Published, March 21, 2012                        Foreclosures and the Housing Market -- statement by Suzanne G. Killian, senior associate director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on the Board's progress in implementing the foreclosure review process and certain enforcement actions.            -Published, March 19, 2012                        Regulatory Reform -- statement by Governor Tarullo before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and its international implications.            -Published, March 22, 2012            Bank Holding Companies            Adam Bank Group, Inc., Tampa, Florida -- to acquire Brazos Valley Bank, N. A., College Station, Texas.            -Approved, March 20, 2012            Forms            Forms -- final Board review to extend with revision the Survey of Terms of Business Lending (FR 2028A), Survey of Terms of Banking Lending to Farmers (FR 2028B), and Prime Rate Supplement to the Survey of Terms of Lending (FR 2028S).            -Approved, March 19, 2012            Regulations and Policies            Leveraged Lending -- publication for comment of updated interagency guidance on leveraged lending.            -Approved, March 21, 2012            Enforcement            Mid America Bank and Trust Company, Dixon, Missouri -- written agreement dated June 8, 2007, terminated March 14, 2012.            -Announced, March 20, 2012                        Remer Bancorporation, Inc., Remer, Minnesota -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.            -Announced, March 22, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
§ 1014.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Equal Opportunity Officer shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to the Section of Personnel Services, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC 20423.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1014.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22896, June 23, 1986; 64 FR 53267, Oct. 1, 1999]
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

OFFICE OF FEDERAL AND STATE MATERIALS

AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

February 28, 2007

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2007-08: POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES OF TIMERELIANT COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS DUE

TO CHANGE IN DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME

DATES

ADDRESSEES

All U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensees and all Agreement State Radiation

Control Program Directors and State Liaison Officers.

PURPOSE

The NRC is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform addressees of the potential

vulnerabilities of computer-based systems and devices due to the change in the start and end

dates of Daylight Savings Time (DST) in 2007. This change could potentially cause problems

for computer-based systems and devices that employ time-dependent processes that have not

been set to synchronize with the 2007 DST change. This IN is issued to ensure that all

recipients are aware of the start and end date changes to DST and the potential for problems

this change could cause.

It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and

consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid any problems. However, suggestions contained in

this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written

response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 included a change in start and end dates of DST beginning in

2007. This year, DST will be extended by a month starting about three weeks sooner, and

ending a week later than usual. Specifically, DST will begin on March 11, 2007, and end on

November 4, 2007, therefore, clocks will be set ahead 1 hour on March 11, 2007, and will be

set back 1 hour on November 4, 2007.

ML070510034
IN 2007-08

Page 2 of 2

DISCUSSION

There are many computer-based systems that may be vulnerable to the 2007 DST changes. 

Examples include software to perform system control, data logging, and time-related

calculations. The DST changes may also have impacts on other time-dependent computer

systems, such as corporate and local Information Technology systems, communication

systems, and security systems.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the

information in this notice, please contact the technical contact below, or the appropriate

regional office.

 /RA/ /RA by TQuay for/

Janet R. Schlueter Michael J. Case, Director

Division of Materials Safety Division of Policy and Rulemaking

and State Agreements Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Office of Federal and State Materials and

Environmental Management Programs

Technical Contact: Matthew Chiramal, NRR/DE 

(301) 415-2845

E-mail: mxc@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public web site,

http://www.nrc.gov under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
p.1 

OAR Box 1670 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

6) ll-D-137 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/24/2008 11:55:14 AM Sheet 6 of 56 
P.2 

OLD MACT SURVEY RESPONSE 

TENNESSEE EASTMAN DIVISION 

EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned officer of National Penn Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:
            November
      6, 2009
            
            By:
            /s/
      Glenn E. MoyerName:
            Glenn
      E. MoyerTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer








The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not for any other
purpose.
#### Higgins v. Utterback.

(Decided April 29, 1919.)

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Costs.—An appeal cannot be taken to, nor granted by, tbe Court of Appeals from a judgment for costs.

DULIN MOSS for appellant.

B. G. WILLIAMS for appellee.

Opinion by

Judge Settle

Overruling motion for appeal and affirming judgment.

The appeal prayed in this case cannot be granted for two reasons, viz.: (1) The record fails to show that the amount or value in controversy is as much as $200.00, exclusive of interest and cost. (2) An appeal will not lie from a judgment for costs or from an order refusing *106a would-be~appellant a judgment for costs. As tbe appeal here moved for is from an order of tbe circuit court refusing tbe appellant her costs in that court, tbe Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to grant or entertain the appeal. Ky. Stats., section 950; Civil Code, page 625.

For the reasons indicated the motion for an appeal is overruled, and the appeal refused.
Docket	No.	FAA- 2015 - 1418

Petitioner – Jackie	E.	Watson Page	1	o f	2 To:	Dan	Ngo FAA	Office	of	Rulemaking From:	Mr.	Jackie	E.	Watson Re:	Docket	No.	FAA- 2015 - 1418 – Additional	Information	Requested Per	your	email	dated	July	8,	2015	the	additional information	you’ve	requested	is	provided	below. Please	attach	this	to	the	original	petition	for	further	processing. All	of	petitioner’s intended	use	sUAS	(Small	Unmanned	Aerial	System)	platforms	are	multi - rotorcraft (quad	copter)	sUAS	platforms weighing no	more	than	55lbs.	including	payload.	Under	normal conditions	they	operate	at	speeds	of	no	more	than	50kts., and	have	the	ability	to	hover	and	move along	a	vertical	and	horizontal	plane	simultaneously. The	following	is	a	current	list	of	the	sUAS	platforms	that	will	be	used	in	petitioners	proposed operation.	Should	additional	sUAS	platforms	be	acquired	for	use	as	indicated	in	petition	they	will	not exceed	55	lbs	operating	weight	(including	payload)	or	operate	in	excess	of	50	kts.	Additionally,	(or	as dire cted	by	the	FAA)	an	addendum	to	this	exemption	will	be	requested	from	the	FAA	for	approval	of any	additional	sUAS	acquired	prior	to	their	commercial	use	by	petitioner. The	multi - rotorcraft	(quad	copters) to	be	used in	proposed	initial	operation	are	presented	below – (Make,	model,	maximum	operating	weight	and	type	of	sUAS	as	shown	in	their	respective	aircraft manuals): sUAS	#1 Make – DJI Model – Inspire	1 – T600 Type – Multi - Rotorcraft (quad	copter) Max	Operating	Weight – 7	lbs.	(includes	battery	and	p ayload) Max	Operating	Speed – 43	kts. sUAS	#2 Make – Yuneec	Electric	Aviation Model – Typhoon - Q500 Type – Multi - Rotorcraft (quad	copter) Max	Operating	Weight – 3	lbs.	12	oz.	(includes	battery	and	payload) Max	Operating	Speed – 47	ktsDocket	No.	FAA- 2015 - 1418

Petitioner – Jackie	E.	Watson Page	2	o f 2 sUAS	#3 Make – Walkera Model – Scout – X4 Type – Multi – Rotorcraft (quad	copter) Max	Operating	Weight – 5	lbs.	(includes	battery	and	payload) Max	Operating	Speed – 41	kts. sUAS	#4 Make – Turbo	Ace Model – Matrix – S Type – Multi - Rotorcraft (quad	copter) Max	Operating	Weight – 10	lbs. Max	Operating	Speed – 45	kts. Please	contact	me	immediately	if	you	require	additional	information	at: jackwatsonphotography@hotmail.com Telephone – 386 - 871 - 0269 Regards, Jackie	(Jack)	E.	Watson
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 29, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wilfred J. Corrigan, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of LSI Logic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 28, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of LSI Logic Corporation.

                                       By: /s/ Wilfred J. Corrigan
                                           ------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Wilfred J. Corrigan
                                       Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
98-1826.

#### Cole v. Am. Industries & Resources Corp.

Jefferson App. No. 96JE51. On motion for admission *pro hac vice*of Melvin L. Moser and John H. Williams, Jr. Motion granted.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32.2











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
C. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











BY:
            /s/
      Stephen C. RichterStephen
      C. RichterExecutive
      Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      2, 2009