alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending August 1, 2009

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CACHE HOLDINGS, INC. | * 3A1       | Cache Holdings, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Healthcare Bancorp, Inc., parent of First BankCentre, both in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. | Newspaper:08/24/2009Federal Register:07/27/2009
|Newspaper:           | 08/24/2009 
|Federal Register:    | 07/27/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|METCALF BK, LEES SUMMIT, MISSOURI | 704559 | 04/13/2009 | 07/23/2009     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 201.124 Service and quashing of subpoenas.

Subpoenas issued under this section may be served upon the person to whom directed in accordance with subpart D of this part. Any person upon whom a subpoena is served may within seven (7) days after service or at any time prior to the return date thereof, whichever is earlier, file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena with the officer who issued the subpoena for action by him, and serve a copy of such motion to quash upon the party requesting the subpoena. If the person to whom the motion to modify or quash the subpoena has been addressed or directed has not acted upon such a motion by the return date, such date shall be stayed pending his final action thereon. The Administration may at any time review, upon its own initiative, the ruling of the officer denying a motion to quash a subpoena. In such cases, the Administration may at any time order that the return date of a subpoena which it has elected to review be stayed pending Administration action thereon.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 5, 2012

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PATRIOT FINANCIAL PARTNERS LP | CIC           | Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, GP, LLC, Patriot Financial Managers, L.P., Patriot Financial Manager, LLC. and Messrs. Ira M. Lubert, W. Kirk Wycoff and James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to purchase up to 24.9 percent of Porter Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, KY. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/21/2011
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 09/21/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. at December 31, 1999, and its statement of
income for the twelve months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form-10K of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. for the twelve months
ended December 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         725,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  356,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,029
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      19,231,068
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,150,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,828,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,767,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,828,319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,298,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  774,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,827,359
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,827,359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,827,359
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. has an unclassified
balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current assets and
current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Tabor, *& a. v.*Harriman.

A purchaser of logs, who pays a debt of the vendor secured by a lien on the logs, may set up his compulsory discharge of the lien, or the partial failure of title in reduction of damages, in an action brought against him by the vendor for the price.

Assumpsit, for a balance due for logs sold. Facts found by a referee.

The plaintiffs agreed to sell and deliver to the defendant, in Connecticut river, below the mouth of Indian Stream, 150,000 feet of spruce logs, — the defendant to deliver to one Vandyke, at the same place, a large amount of similar logs; and it was understood by the plaintiffs that Vandyke, under his contract with the defendant, was to have their .logs. The logs were delivered upon the banks of Indian Stream, and driven by Vandyke to the place of delivery in the Connecticut river. The plaintiff employed Vandyke for a reasonable compensation to drive the logs to the place of delivery; and when Vandyke settled with the defendant, he retained $68.66, which was a reasonable compensation for driving them. Vandyke retained possession of the logs continuously, and claimed a lien on them for driving. This suit is brought to recover the $68.66 retained by Vandyke.

*Dudley,*for the plaintiffs.

*227
      *Aldrich 8f*Parsons, for the defendant.

Stanley, J.

Vandyke had a lien on the logs for driving them. 2 Kent Com. 635, and notes; *Jacobs*v. *Knapp,*50 N. H. 71, 76. That lien the defendant was compelled to discharge before he could have the plaintiffs’ logs to apply on his contract with Vandyke. Having discharged it, the amount paid for that purpose was money paid, laid out, and expended for the plaintiffs, and was proper matter of defence against their claim for pay for the logs. Upon the facts stated, the defendant is entitled to

*Judgment on the report.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly report of Oasis Online Technologies Corp. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Erik Cooper, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
        of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Oasis Online Technologies Corp. and will be retained Oasis Online Technologies
        Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
 
 Date:  November
                  19, 2007
              By
                  /s/Erik
                  Cooper          .Erik
                  CooperPrincipal
                  Executive
                  Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1830 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1830

                 For the relief of Major Ralph Edwards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1995

 Mr. Scarborough introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Major Ralph Edwards.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF RETIRED PAY FOR MAJOR RALPH EDWARDS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of computing the retired pay of Major 
Ralph Edwards (262-60-7147), United States Air Force, retired, under 
chapter 871 of title 10, United States Code, Major Ralph Edwards shall 
be considered to have held the grade of lieutenant colonel on the date 
of his retirement.
    (b) Applicability.--This section shall apply to retired pay payable 
for any month beginning more than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. LUMP-SUM PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay to Major 
Ralph Edwards, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, an amount equal to the difference between--
            (1) the total amount of retired pay that Major Ralph 
        Edwards would have received under chapter 867 of title 10, 
        United States Code, if section 1 applied to the period 
        beginning on the date of his retirement and ending on the last 
        day of the month that precedes the first month to which section 
        1 applies; and
            (2) the total amount of retired pay that Major Ralph 
        Edwards received under such chapter for the period described in 
        paragraph (1).
    (b) Limitation of Agents and Attorneys Fees.--It shall be unlawful 
for an amount that exceeds 10 percent of the amount described in 
subsection (a) to be paid to or received by any agent or attorney for 
any service rendered in connection with the benefits provided by this 
Act. Any person who violates this subsection shall be guilty of an 
infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in 
title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
98-2170.

#### State ex rel. Hall v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

In Prohibition. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 24-G
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes and appointsDouglas D. Burkett, Ph. D. and Andrew A. Stevens, and each of them severally,as his attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,to sign and file on his behalf individually and in each such capacity statedbelow, Zila, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31,2004, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, The NASDAQ Stock Market, and otherwise, as fully as such personcould do in person, hereby verifying and confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact, or their or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully door cause to be done by virtue hereof.     **Signatures** **Title** **Date** **Douglas D. Burkett, Ph. D.** President and Chief Executive Officerand a Director September 30, 2004**Principal Executive Officer**          **Andrew A. Stevens** Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer September 30, 2004**Principal Financial andAccounting Officer**         **Directors**          **Morris C. Aaron**   September 30, 2004      **Leslie H. Green**   September 30, 2004      **Christopher D. Johnson**   September 30, 2004      **Michael S. Lesser**   September 30, 2004     **/s/ John Edward Porter**
#### AMERICAN *LOAN &*INVESTMENT COMPANY, a corporation, Respondent, v. B. P. BORASS and C. D. OLSON, Appellants, and A. J. BJERKEN, Garnishee.

(188 N. W. 304.)

Liquidated damage — provision of land sale contract.

1. The following language appeared in a written contract for deed: “Either party hereto who shall fail or refuse (except for imperfect title) •to comply with the provisions of this contract on his part to be perform-shall forfeit or pay to the other party the sum of $2,000, which sum ds hereby fixed and agreed upon as liquidated damages to be sustained by either party from failure or default on the part of the other.”

Vendor and purchaser — in vendor’s action for installments due, held that purchaser in possession and in default were not entitled to rescind on payment of liquidated damages.

2. It is heM defendants being in possession, exercising dominion over the land described in the contract, and also being in default are not in position to invoke this clause of the contract.

Vendor and purchaser — vendor may recover against purchaser unpaid installments due and past due interest.

3. The vendor in a contract may maintain an action to recover against the vendee the .amount of an unpaid installment or installments, which are due, and for all past due interest.

Opinion filed May 17, 1922.

Appeal from the judgment of the District court of Barnes county, *Englert,*J.

Judgment affirmed.

*Combs*& Ritchie, for appellants.

*John O. Hanchett,*for respondent.

Grace, J.

This action is a companion case to American Loan & Investment Co. v. B. P. Borass, C. A. Steberg, C. D. Olson, and Theodore T. Moen ante, 1036; 188 N. W. 302. It was presented to this court with *1042that case upon the same brief and argued at the same time. The decision of it is ruled by the decision in that case.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The respondent is entitled to its costs and disbursements on appeal.

Birdzell, C. J., and Robinson, Bronson, and Christianson, JJ., concur.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending July 7, 2012

----

Bank Branches, DomesticRichmond          Sonabank, McLean, Virginia -- to establish a branch at 6719 Leaberry Way, Unit L, Haymarket.            -Approved, July 5, 2012            Bank Holding CompaniesGeneral Counsel          Ally Financial Inc., Detroit, Michigan -- request for an exemption under the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act and Regulation L.            -Granted, July 3, 2012            Boston          Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts -- to increase its interest in Anchor Capital Advisors LLC, Boston.            -Approved, July 2, 2012            San Francisco          RBB Bancorp, Los Angeles, California -- to form a subsidiary, RBB Asset Management Company, Los Angeles, to engage in extending credit and servicing loans.            -Approved, July 6, 2012            St. Louis          Southern Missouri Bancshares, Inc., Marshfield, Missouri -- to engage in lending activities.            -Approved, July 3, 2012            Change in Bank ControlMinneapolis          FNB Bancshares, Inc., Blue Earth, Minnesota -- to retain control of FNB Bancshares and its subsidiary bank, First Bank Blue Earth, Blue Earth.            -Permitted, July 6, 2012            Extensions of TimeSt. Louis          The McGehee Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, McGehee, Arkansas -- extension to October 4, 2012, to increase its ownership of Southeast Financial Bankstock Corporation, McGehee, and its subsidiary bank, McGehee Bank.            -Granted, July 3, 2012            Financial Holding Companies Chicago          Horizon Bancorp, Michigan City, Indiana -- election to become a financial holding company.            -Effective, July 3, 2012            Dallas          Triumph Bancorp, Inc., Dallas, Texas -- election to become a financial holding company.            -Effective, July 5, 2012            MembershipSecretary          Jonah Bank of Wyoming, Casper, Wyoming -- to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.            -Approved, July 6, 2012            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
§ 1.88 The Federal Railroad Administration. Is responsible for: ( a ) Regulating safety functions pertaining to railroads;
( b ) Conducting research and development activity in support of safer and more efficient rail transportation;
( c ) Investigating and issuing reports concerning collisions, derailments, and other railroad accidents resulting in serious injury to persons or to the property of a railroad;
( d ) Developing safety strategies to combat the causes of collisions, derailments, and other railroad accidents, as well as to reduce overall risk in the Nation's rail systems;
( e ) Promoting and strengthening the national rail system, including freight rail and high speed and higher performing intercity passenger rail.
( f ) Providing financial assistance, including grants, loans and loan guarantees, for rail freight and intermodal development, as well as high-speed and intercity passenger rail development;
( g ) Maximizing the positive impacts on the U.S. economy by encouraging domestic manufacturing on rail projects through the enforcement of Buy America provisions; and
( h ) Strengthening local communities by supporting station-area development and strong connections among rail passenger service, intercity bus, local transit, bicycle/pedestrian, and airport facilities.