alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      27,107,029
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,272
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,800,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 75,354,971
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     100,219,448
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       102,306,157
<LOANS>                                    325,302,592
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (3,762,668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             556,235,253
<DEPOSITS>                                 486,676,633
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,662,687
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    28,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,895,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             556,235,253
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,668,672
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,756,139
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               289,263
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            19,714,434
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,625,265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,640,389
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,074,045
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,520,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             351,055
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,004,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,205,909
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,686,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.68
<LOANS-NON>                                  5,627,890
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,943,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  823,668
<RECOVERIES>                                   123,336
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,762,668
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, April 5, 1995 (56), Para 56.19 Waiving Points of Order Against Conference Report on H.R.889]
[Page 577]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.56.19  waiving points of order against conference report on h.r.889

  Ms. PRYCE, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-102) the resolution (H. Res. 129) waiving certain points of order 
during consideration of the bill (H.R. 889) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations and rescissions to preserve and enhance the 
military readiness of the Department of Defense for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1775 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1775

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
restoration of the prior law formula for the inclusion in gross income 
      of social security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1995

   Mr. Nadler (for himself, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Maloney, and Mrs. Lowey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
restoration of the prior law formula for the inclusion in gross income 
      of social security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF PRIOR LAW FORMULA FOR INCLUSION IN GROSS 
              INCOME OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND TIER 1 RAILROAD RETIREMENT 
              BENEFITS.
    (a) Restoration of Prior Law Inclusion Formula.--Subsection (a) of 
section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(a) In General.--Gross income for the taxable year of any 
taxpayer described in subsection (b) (notwithstanding section 207 of 
the Social Security Act) includes social security benefits in an amount 
equal to the lesser of--
            ``(1) one-half of the social security benefits received 
        during the taxable year, or
            ``(2) one-half of the excess described in subsection 
        (b)(1).''
    (b) Repeal of Adjusted Base Amount.--Subsection (c) of section 86 
of such Code is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Base Amount.--For purposes of this section, the term `base 
amount' means--
            ``(1) except as otherwise provided in this subsection, 
        $25,000,
            ``(2) $32,000 in the case of a joint return, and
            ``(3) zero in the case of a taxpayer who--
                    ``(A) is married as of the close of the taxable 
                year (within the meaning of section 7703) but does not 
                file a joint return for such year, and
                    ``(B) does not live apart from his spouse at all 
                times during the taxable year.''
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (A) of section 871(a)(3) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``85 percent'' and inserting ``50 
percent''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               CAPITAL RE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                     Exhibit 11 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                                           (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)


                                                                                               Year Ended
                                                                                              December 31,
                                                                    ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              1998                   1997                    1996
                                                                    ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>                    <C>                     <C>
Net Income from Continuing Operations                                        44,187                 70,818                  57,014
Net Income                                                                   41,542                 70,052                  56,524

Basic weighted average shares outstanding during the period                  31,885                 31,746                  31,312
Potentially dilutive employee stock options                                     760                    759                     580
                                                                    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding during the period                32,645                 32,505                  31,892
                                                                    ===============================================================

Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations                    $1.39                  $2.23                   $1.82
                                                                    ===============================================================
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations                  $1.35                  $2.18                   $1.79
                                                                    ===============================================================

Basic earnings per common share                                               $1.30                  $2.21                   $1.81
                                                                    ===============================================================
Diluted earnings per common share                                             $1.27                  $2.16                   $1.77
                                                                    ===============================================================
</TABLE>
98-1607.

#### Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Lake App. No. 97-L-031. This cause is pending as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lake County. On November 23, 1998, this court received a request from the court of appeals that the time for filing the record in this cause be extended and this cause be temporarily remanded to the court of appeals so that the court of appeals may address the merits of certain matters pending on reconsideration. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the time for filing the record in this cause be extended and this cause be temporarily remanded to the court of appeals for the purpose of entering a decision on the merits of those matters pending on reconsideration. The record shall be returned to the Clerk of the Supreme Court as soon as the court of appeals has entered judgment on those matters.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that briefing in this cause be stayed until the record is returned to the Clerk of the Supreme Court and this court orders briefing to commence.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00341-CR

Joseph Michael Clemett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 0993830, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Joseph Michael Clemett pleaded guilty to intentionally or knowingly

causing serious bodily injury to a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.04(a)(1) (West Supp.

2000). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for forty

years.

Appellant’s attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without

merit. Although counsel was retained, the brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988);

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State,

436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant,
2

and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.

No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the

appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: December 21, 2000

Do Not Publish
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1643

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Bulgaria.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND SUPPLE4 MENTAL ACTION.

5 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds

6 that Bulgaria—
2

•HR 1643 RFS

1 (1) has received most-favored-nation treatment

2 since 1991 and has been found to be in full compli3 ance with the freedom of emigration requirements

4 under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 since 1993;

5 (2) has reversed many years of Communist dic6 tatorship and instituted a constitutional republic

7 ruled by a democratically elected government as well

8 as basic market-oriented reforms, including privat9 ization;

10 (3) is in the process of acceding to the General

11 Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the

12 World Trade Organization (WTO), and extension of

13 unconditional most-favored-nation treatment would

14 enable the United States to avail itself of all rights

15 under the GATT and the WTO with respect to Bul16 garia; and

17 (4) has demonstrated a strong desire to build

18 friendly relationships and to cooperate fully with the

19 United States on trade matters.

20 (b) SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION.—The Congress notes

21 that the United States Trade Representative intends to

22 negotiate with Bulgaria in order to preserve the commit23 ments of that country under the bilateral commercial

24 agreement in effect between that country and the United

25 States that are consistent with the GATT and the WTO.
3

•HR 1643 RFS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF

2 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO BULGARIA.

3 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN4 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith5 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974

6 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

7 (1) determine that such title should no longer

8 apply to Bulgaria; and

9 (2) after making a determination under para10 graph (1) with respect to Bulgaria, proclaim the ex11 tension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most12 favored-nation treatment) to the products of that

13 country.

14 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

15 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub16 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod17 ucts of Bulgaria, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall

18 cease to apply to that country.

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### Wentworth *v.*Jefferson.

Whether a case should be taken from the jury because counsel, in their presence, offer testimony which is not admitted, is a question of fact to he determined at the trial term.

A town is liable for damages happening, by reason of a defective highway, to a person illegally travelling on Sunday, if the illegality of his act does not contribute to the accident.

Case, for injuries received from a defective highway. The plaintiff was unable to attend the trial, and her motion that the jury be allowed to go to her house and see her was denied. After-wards, when the jury were near the plaintiff’s house viewing the highway, by order of the court, her counsel in the presence of the jury proposed that they should go into the house and see her if the defendants’ counsel would consent. The defendants’ counsel objected, and the jury did not see her. The defendants moved that the case be taken from the jury, and continued at the plaintiff’s expense. The accident occurred on Sunday. The evidence tended to show that the plaintiff’s husband had a field of grain some distance from the house, partly unfenced, and that one of her sons, who was going to the field with a carriage to see if the cattle had injured the grain, invited her to accompany him, which she did. While on the way she received the injury complained of. The defendants requested the court to instruct the jury that if the plaintiff was not travelling as a work of necessity or mercy, she could not recover. Subject to exception, the request was denied. Verdict for the plaintiff.

*W. S. Seywood*and *Ladd*Fletcher, for the defendants.

*Lay, Drew 8f Jordan,*for the plaintiff.

Bingham, J.

Whether the case should have been taken from the jury on account of the offer made by counsel, was a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. *Zollar*v. Janvrin, 47 N. H. 324. Although the plaintiff violated the law by travelling on Sunday, she might recover if the illegality of the act did not contribute to the accident. *Corey*v. *Bath, 35*N. H. 530, 541; *Sutton*v. *Wauwatosa,*29 Wis. 21; *Sewell*v. *Webster,*59 N. H. 586.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
§ 97.30-1 Repairs to boilers and pressure vessels. ( a ) Before making any repairs to boilers or unfired pressure vessels, the chief engineer shall submit a report covering the nature of the repairs to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, at or nearest to the port where the repairs are to be made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
                           This Schedule Contains Summary
                           Financial Information Extracted From
                           the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
                           April 30, 1998 and Unaudited Consolidated 
                           Statements Of Income For The Three Months 
                           Ended April 30, 1998 and is qualified in its 
                           entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1
<CURRENCY>                 United States
<CIK>                      0000702167
<NAME>                     Universal Money Centers, Inc.
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        FEB-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                   114,273
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            299,970
<ALLOWANCES>                              21,380
<INVENTORY>                                  300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         403,243
<PP&E>                                 3,047,186
<DEPRECIATION>                         1,576,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,221,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    633,240
<BONDS>                                  662,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 398,514
<OTHER-SE>                             2,189,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,221,121
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,161,427
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            307,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          32,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        32,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           45,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       72,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              45,791
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .001

        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated August 15, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Collegiate Pacific Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Collegiate Pacific Inc. on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-64471 and File No. 333-34294)
and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-59878).



                                                 /s/   Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 29, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 32338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  12 p.m., Tuesday, June 19, 2007.

Place:  Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 

Tuesday, June 19 at 12 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Postal Regulatory Commission Second Opinion and Recommended 
Decision on Reconsideration in Docket No. R2006-1, Postal Rate and Fee 
Changes.
    3. Rate Case Update.
    4. Labor Negotiations Update.
    5. Financial Update.
    6. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    7. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Contact Person for More Information:  Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-2914 Filed 6-7-07; 4:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M