alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 1, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1503.207 Inspection authority. ( a ) Each person subject to any of the requirements in this chapter or other applicable authority must allow TSA and other authorized DHS officials, at any time and in a reasonable manner, without advance notice, to enter, assess, inspect, and test property, facilities, equipment, and operations; and to view, inspect, and copy records, as necessary to carry out TSA's security-related statutory or regulatory authorities and without a subpoena, including its authority to— ( 1 ) Assess threats to transportation.
( 2 ) Enforce security-related laws, regulations, directives, and requirements.
( 3 ) Inspect, maintain, and test the security of facilities, equipment, and systems.
( 4 ) Ensure the adequacy of security measures for the transportation of passengers and cargo.
( 5 ) Oversee the implementation, and ensure the adequacy, of security measures for conveyances and vehicles, at transportation facilities and infrastructure and other assets related to transportation.
( 6 ) Review security plans and/or programs.
( 7 ) Determine compliance with any requirements in this chapter.
( 8 ) Carry out such other duties, and exercise such other powers, relating to transportation security, as the Administrator for TSA considers appropriate, to the extent authorized by law.
( b ) At the request of TSA, each person subject to the requirements of this chapter must provide evidence of compliance with this chapter, including copies of records.
( c ) TSA and other authorized DHS officials, may enter, without advance notice, and be present within any area or within any vehicle or conveyance, terminal, or other facility covered by this chapter without access media or identification media issued or approved by a person subject to requirements in this chapter or other applicable authority in order to inspect or test compliance, or perform other such duties as TSA may direct.
( d ) TSA inspectors and other authorized DHS officials working with TSA will, on request, present their credentials for examination, but the credentials may not be photocopied or otherwise reproduced.
[89 FR 35625, May 1, 2024]
#### Garret Arrex, *Executor, etc., v.*James E. Jansen.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted; referee discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Bookes, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending February 7, 2009

----

EnforcementElmwood Financial Corporation, Racine, Wisconsin, and Bank of Elmwood  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions.					-Announced, February 3, 2009 					First SCK Financial Corporation, Anthony, Kansas  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.					-Announced, February 3, 2009 					Sun American Bancorp, Boca Raton, Florida, and Sun American Bank  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Florida Office of Financial Regulation.					-Announced, February 3, 2009 					

FormsForms  -- initial Board review to extend without revision the�Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices (FR 2018), Senior Financial Officer Survey (FR 2023), Automobile Finance Terms (FR 2005), Passenger Auto Contract Collection Trends at Major Sales Finance Companies (FR 2012), Quarterly Report of Interest Rates on Selected Direct Consumer Installment Loans (FR 2835), and Quarterly Report of Credit Card Plans (FR 2835a).					-Proposed, February 6, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyLiquidity Facilities  -- extension through October 30, 2009, of the Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, Commercial Paper Funding Facility, Money Market Investor Funding Facility, Primary Dealer Credit Facility, and (approved jointly with the Federal Open Market Committee) Term Securities Lending Facility.					-Approved, January 27, 2009 					(AC)Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility  -- revised terms and conditions, including loan rates, collateral haircuts, the definition of eligible borrowers, and additional specifications for eligible asset-backed securities collateral.					-Approved, February 6, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: February 12, 2009
97-2676.

#### Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Caliman.

Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 461, 700 N.E.2d 857. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
#### § 1242.25 Locomotive servicing facilities (account XX-19-27).

Separate common expenses according to distribution of common expenses in the following accounts:

Locomotive Fuel (XX-51-67 and XX-52-67)

Electric Power Purchased or Produced for Motive Power (XX-51-68 and XX-52-68)

Servicing Locomotives (XX-51-69 and XX-52-69)
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 2, 2012

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------ | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FAUQUIER BANK, THE | * Branch       | The Fauquier Bank, Warrenton, Virginia, to establish a branch at 7485 Limestone Drive, Gainsville, Virginia | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | Not available 
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Motion Granted and Order filed January 29, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-01023-CV

____________

DONALD VAUGHN AND DKV ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellants

V.

DAVID A. BJORKLUND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-22185

ORDER

On January 23, 2015, appellants notified this court that the parties had 

reached an agreement to settle the issues on appeal and request an extension of 

appellate deadlines for thirty days to file the docketing statement, pay for the 

record, and pay the appellate filing fee. The motion is granted and we issue the 

following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket for thirty days from the date of this order. The appeal will be 
reinstated on this court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a 

motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby and Brown.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                        [MCW. TODMAN & CO. LETTERHEAD]



IBC 3805

HC/TB/110198


February 17, 2003

Messrs. Grant Thornton
13th Floor Gloucester Tower
11 Pedder Street
Central Hong Kong

Attn: Mr. Michael Creasy

Dear Sirs:

We act as Counsel for Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, (the "Company") in the British
Virgin Islands and so acted during the course of 2002.

We have noted the contents of the letter dated January 16, 2003 from the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company to us that was copied to you stating the
Company's evaluation of claims in respect of which our advice has been sought.

We are of the opinion that the claims therein are properly described and the
evaluations of these claims are reasonable save for the claim in respect of the
priority of repayment of debts from Tele-Art Inc. (in Liquidation).  This was a
claim by the former Official Liquidator, David Hague, seeking inter alia orders
that the redemption of 138,500 shares by the Company should be set aside, all
certificates for Nam Tai shares (owned by Tele-Art Inc.) be handed over to the
Official Liquidator and that the Company should pay to the Official Liquidator
all dividends and distributions in respect of those shares.  This matter was
heard in July 2002 and judgment was delivered in January 2003 ordering the
Company to deliver to Tele-Art Inc. (in Liquidation) all of its property
retained by the Company and setting aside the redemption of shares and set off
of dividends.  The Company has sought leave to appeal this Order and to stay its
execution pending determination of the appeal.

As of the date of this letter, we are not aware of any other claims or
potential or threatened litigation against the Company.
<PAGE>
We do not hold any deeds, leases, securities, agreements or completion
statements on behalf of the Company, nor do we hold any monies on account for
the Company.  The outstanding fees due to us by the Company as of December 31,
2002 were $34,193.75

Yours faithfully,


/s/ McW. Todman & Co.
MCW. TODMAN & CO.

cc Client
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                   Exhibit D-2
                          Form of Overline Credit Note

                              OVERLINE CREDIT NOTE

$4,000,000                                                      February 1, 2005

      PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP. INC. ("Borrower"), a corporation organized under
the laws of Delaware. for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of
MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY ("Bank") at its offices at One M&T
Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14240, the principal sum of Four Million Dollars
($4,000,000) or, if less, the amount of the Overline Credit Loans loaned by the
Bank to Borrower pursuant to the Agreement referred to below, in lawful money of
the United States of America and in immediately available funds on the date(s)
and in the manner provided in said Agreement and with a final payment on May 30,
2005. Borrower also promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance
hereof, for the period such balance is outstanding, in like money, at the rates
of interest as provided in the Agreement described below, on the date(s) and in
the manner provided in said Agreement.

      The date and amount of each Overline Credit Loan made by the Bank to the
Borrower under the Agreement referred to below, maturity date and each payment
of principal thereof, shall be recorded by the Bank on its books. The Bank's
records shall be presumed to be accurate absent manifest error.

      This is the Overline Credit Note referred to in that certain Amendment
Number 1 to Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
(as amended from time to time, the "Agreement") dated as of February 1, 2005,
between Borrower and Bank and evidences the Overline Credit Loans made
thereunder. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings
given to them in the Agreement.

      Borrower waives presentment, notice of dishonor, protest and any other
notice or formality with respect to this Overline Credit Note.

      This Overline Credit Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of
New York.

                                                 PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.

                                                 By:    /s/ James R. Riedman
                                                        ________________________
                                                 Name:  James R. Riedman
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1875 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1875

   To provide for the conveyance of the reversionary interest of the 
United States in certain lands to the Clint Independent School District 
              and the Fabens Independent School District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1995

 Mr. Coleman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the conveyance of the reversionary interest of the 
United States in certain lands to the Clint Independent School District 
              and the Fabens Independent School District.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.

    Subject to section 2, the Secretary of State shall execute and file 
in the appropriate office such instrument as may be necessary to 
release the reversionary interest of the United States in the forty-
acre tract of land referred to in Public Law 85-42.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    The release under section 1 shall be made upon condition that the 
Clint Independent School District and the Fabens Independent School 
District in the State of Texas use any proceeds received from the 
disposal of such land for public educational purposes.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.13 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay]
[Pages 636-637]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.13  1995 special olympics torch relay

  Mr. GILCHREST, by unanimous consent, called up the following 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 64):

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring),

     SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH 
                   RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

       On May 19, 1995, or on such other date as the Speaker of 
     the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of 
     the Senate may jointly designate, the 1995 Special Olympics 
     Torch Relay may be run through the Capitol Grounds, as part 
     of the journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District 
     of Columbia Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet 
     University in the District of Columbia.

     SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

       The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be 
     necessary to carry out section 1.

     SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

       The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for 
     physical preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution

[[Page 637]]

was agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
concurrent resolution.
```
#### Bowker Robinson, *Respondent, v.*John A. Rowland and others, *Assessors, etc.,*Appellants.

Motion denied.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.16 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1044]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.16  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. BROWNBACK:

       Page 12, line 8 strike ``$7,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$3,000,000''.
       Page 13, strike line 18 and all that follows through page 
     14, line 11.
       Page 16, line 24, strike ``$595,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$619,000,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

78

negative

Nays

340
```
#### Bertha Schiefer, Appellant, *v.*Minna Freygang, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Oscar C. Freygang, Deceased, et al., Defendants, and The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company et al., Respondents.

*Schiefer*v. *Freygang,*125 App. Div. 498, affirmed.

(Argued September 28, 1910;

decided October 18, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April *22,*1908, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the answer and overruled such demurrer.

The following questions were certified :

*“*1. Is the fifth separate defense contained in the answer herein of the defendants, The New York and Harlem Railroad Company and The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, sufficient in law upon the face thereof ?

*“2.*Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against the defendants The New York and Harlem Railroad Company and The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company ? ”

*L. M. BerTi.eley*for apjiellant.

*Robert A.*Kutsehboel;, *Alex. 8. Lyman*and *Lra A. Place*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, and second question certified answered in the negative; first question not answered; no opinion.

' Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner,Willard Bartlett, IIiscock and Chase, JJ.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 01-406 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

High Energy Neutron Detector 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Signed April 6, 2001 

with 

Annex 

 and 

Agreement Extending and 

Amending the Agreement 

Signed September 12 and 18, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

 

 Space Cooperation: High Energy 

 Neutron Detector 

 Agreement signed April 6, 2001; 

 Entered into force April 6, 2001. 

 With annex. 

 And agreement extending and amending the 

 agreement. 

 Signed September 12 and 18, 2006; 

 Entered into force September 18, 2006. 







Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Russian text of this Implementing Agreement. If the Russian text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of BSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 24, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Howard W. Sharp                  
|Howard W. Sharp                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
3/4/2015 OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
OFFICIAL BUS! 

### STATE OF TEXA§. PENALTYFOR ,1-'; 

### PRIVATE USE :;Z MAR06 2015 

## SMITH,WILLIAM DENON TKCt. No*!^§3%530%ftffPFROM'WR^82,8r5Sl-02 This is to advise that the Court""has'denied^without written order the application for writ ofhabeas corpus on the findings'ofthe tnalcourt without a hearing. Abel Acosta, Clerk

WILLIAM DENON SMITH TDC# 1928399 

# f$J$?