alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          55,844
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,303
<PP&E>                                       5,448,326
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,049,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,682,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,682,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,682,520
<SALES>                                      1,788,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,791,219
<CGS>                                        1,003,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,003,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               233,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                554,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            554,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   554,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    35.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    35.77
        

</TABLE>
#### ANDRE GUSTAF, Appellant, *v.*THE AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Respondent.

*Practice— a party to an action cannot be compelled to appea/i' for examination before trial in any county other than the one in which he resides or has an office*— *Code of Civil Procedv,re, sec.*886.

Under section 886 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a party to an action cannot be required to appear for an examiaation before trial in any county other than that in which he resides or has an office for the regular transaction of business in person.

The t^ct that the action is brought and is to be tried in such other comity does not authorize the court to require him to go out of the county of his residence.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order obtained by the defendant requiring him to appear for examination before trial, in the court*96house iu the 'city of Brooklyn. The plaintiff resided in the city of New York. The place of trial of the action was Kings county.

,/. *Edward Swanstrom,*for the appellant.

*Edward 8.*Hubbe, for the respondent.

Barnard, P. J.:

By section 886, .Code of Civil Procedure, when a person to be examined before trial, resides in the State, he shall not be required to attend in any county other than that in which he resides, or where he has an office for the regular transaction of business in person. The plaintiff resides in the city and county of New York, and has no office in Kings county. The order requires him to appear in Kings county to be examined. The fact that the place of trial -of the action is designated to be Kings county does not enlarge the power to require a party tq go out of the county of his residence: The section makes no exception, in favor of counties in which the place of trial is placed. An examination before trial rests upon article 1, of title 3 of the Code, and that article restricts the place of examination in all cases to a county in which a person resides.

The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Dykman and Pratt, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements.
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 91.20-15 Scope of inspection. ( a ) The initial inspection, which may consist of a series of inspections during the construction of a vessel, shall include a complete inspection of the structure, including the outside of the vessel's bottom, the machinery, unfired pressure vessels, equipment and the inside and outside of the boilers. The inspection shall be such as to insure that the arrangements, material, and scantlings of the structure, boilers, and other pressure vessels and their appurtenances, piping, main and auxiliary machinery, electrical installations, lifesaving appliances, fire-detecting and extinguishing equipment, pilot boarding equipment, pollution prevention equipment, and other equipment fully comply with the applicable regulations for such vessel and are in accordance with approved plans, and determine that the vessel is in possession of a valid certificate issued by the Federal Communications Commission, if any. The inspection shall be such as to ensure that the workmanship of all parts of the vessel and its equipment is in all respects satisfactory and that the vessel is provided with lights, means of making sound signals, and distress signals as required by applicable statutes and regulations.
( b ) When equipment is installed which is not required by applicable regulations in this subchapter, that equipment shall be inspected and tested as required for such equipment by applicable regulations in subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter. For example, fire-detecting systems shall be inspected and tested as required by subpart 71.20 of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16974, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-32, 33 FR 5718, Apr. 12, 1968; CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18901, Dec. 18, 1968; CGD 71-161R, 37 FR 28262, Dec. 21, 1972; CGD 82-036, 48 FR 654, Jan. 6, 1983; CGD 79-032, 49 FR 25455, June 21, 1984; CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48051, Sept. 18, 1995]
§ 502.61 Proceedings. ( a ) Any person may commence a proceeding by filing a complaint (Rule 62) for a formal adjudication or by filing a claim for the informal adjudication of small claims (subpart S). A person may also file a petition for a rulemaking (Rule 51), for an exemption (Rule 74), for a declaratory order (Rule 75), or for other appropriate relief (Rule 76), which becomes a proceeding when the Commission assigns a formal docket number to the petition.
( b ) The Commission may commence a proceeding for a rulemaking, for an adjudication (including Commission enforcement action under § 502.63), or a non-adjudicatory investigation upon petition or on its own initiative by issuing an appropriate order.
( c ) Persons entitled to notice of hearings, except those notified by complaint service under § 502.113, will be duly and timely informed of the nature of the proceeding, the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the proceeding is conducted, and the terms, substance, and issues involved, or the matters of fact and law asserted, as the case may be. Such notice will be published in the Federal Register unless all persons subject thereto are named and either are served or otherwise have notice thereof in accordance with law.
( d ) In the order instituting a proceeding or in the notice of filing of complaint and assignment, the Commission must establish dates by which the initial decision and the final Commission decision will be issued. These dates may be extended by order of the Commission for good cause shown. [Rule 61.]
[77 FR 61524, Oct. 10, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 93835, Dec. 22, 2016]
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Juanita Silva

, * From the 90th District Court

of Stephens County

Trial Court No. CV31978

.

Vs. No. 11

- 18

- 00054

- CV * June 21 , 2018

Jonell Filtration Products * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

d/b/a Jonell, Inc., (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

This court has considered Juanita Silva ’s motion to dismiss this appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance

with this court’s op inion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against Juanita Silva

.
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.30-19 Supervision by person in charge. ( a ) No person may connect, top off, disconnect, or engage in any other critical product transfer operation unless the person in charge designated in § 98.30-17, personally supervises the operation.
( b ) No person may start the flow of a product to or from a portable tank or IBC unless instructed to do so by the person in charge.
( c ) No person may transfer a product to or from a portable tank or IBC unless the person in charge is in the immediate vicinity of the transfer operation and immediately available to the person transferring the product.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]
§ 78.33-10 Notice required before repairs. ( a ) No repairs or alterations, except in an emergency, shall be made to any lifesaving or fire detecting or extinguishing equipment without advance notice to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. When emergency repairs or alterations have been made, notice shall be given to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, as soon as practicable.
( b ) [Reserved]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GL OR I A C R UZ R AU NO , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70712 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 929- 876 ME MOR AN DU M *

GL OR I A C R UZ R AU NO , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72238 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 929- 876

GL OR I A C R UZ R AU NO , P et i t i on er , v. N o. 07- 72943 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 929- 876



# FI LED MA R 03 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSE R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l,

R e s p o n d e n t.

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry18, 2011

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , R Y M E R , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G l or i aC ruz R auno, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , appe a l s ade c i s i on by th e Bo a r do f

I mmi g r a t i o n A p p e a l s ( BI A ) d e n y i n g h e rap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e f r om G ua t e m a l a . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252 a nd gr a ntthe pe t i t i on. A lth o u g h d e f

e r e n c e is d u e to th e a g e n c y ’s c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s , se e Sh restha v. H

older , 5 9 0 F .3 d 1 0 3 4 , 1 0 4 1 -4 2 (9 th C ir. 2 0 1 0 ), in th is ca se th e I J’s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyf

i ndi ng, w hi c h the B I A di d notdi s turb, i s nots upport e d by s u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e . W ith o n e e x c e p tio n , th e in c o n s is te n c ie s id e n tif ie da r e s im p ly no ti ncon si st enci es atal l . R uano ’ s s t at em entatthe bo rderdo es di ff erfr om her la te rs ta te m e n t to th e a s y lu m o f f ic e ra n dI J , b u t it c a n n o t c a rryth e d a y . Se e Si ngh v . I NS , 292 F . 3d 1017, 1022- 24 ( 9th C i r . 2002) . T he m e r i t s of R ua no’ s appl i c a t i on ar e notbefore us, no r di d the B IA rul e on the m er i t s. T here fore , w e r em and so thatthe B I A m a yde t e rm i ne i n the f i r s ti ns t a nc e R auno’ s e l i gi bi l i tyf orr e l i e f i n l i ghtof h e rc r e d ib le te s tim o n y . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 (200 2) (percuri am ). GR AN T E D.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.8 Mexico-U.S. Interparliamentary Group]
[Page 632]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.8  mexico-u.s. interparliamentary group

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. REGULA, announced that pursuant to the 
provisions of 22 U.S.C. 276h, the Speaker did appoint to the United 
States Delegation of the Mexico-United States Interparliamentary Group 
for the First Session of the 104th Congress the following Members on the 
part of the House:

  Mr. Ballenger of North Carolina, vice chairman; Mr. Gilman of New 
York; Mr. Dreier of California; Mr. Salmon of Arizona; Mr. Hayworth of 
Arizona; Mr. Brownback of Kansas; Mr. de la Garza of Texas; Mr. 
Gejdenson of Connecticut; Mr. Coleman of Texas; Mr. Miller of 
California; and Mr. Rangel of New York. 

  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate of the foregoing 
appointments.
```
§ 76.35-5 Zoning. ( a ) The zoning of the manual alarm system must meet the same requirements as those for the fire detection system set forth in § 76.27-15(d).
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16940, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48259, July 22, 2016]
§ 1242.31 Lease rentals—debit and credit and other rents—debit and credit (accounts 31-17-00, 31-18-00, 31-19-00, 32-17-00, 32-18-00, 32-19-00, 35-17-00, 35-18-00, 35-19-00, 36-17-00, 36-18-00, and 36-19-00). ( a ) Separate common debit expense accounts in each subactivity (running, switching and other) in proportion to the separation of solely related freight or passenger service in each account. If there are no solely related expenses in an account or if the solely related expenses are assignable entirely to freight or to passenger service, separate common debit expense accounts on the basis of the same percentages calculated for the separation of administration—other (account XX-19-06).
( b ) Separate all common credit expense accounts on the same percentages calculated for the separation of administration—other (account XX-19-06).
§ 1111.11 Meeting to discuss procedural matters. ( a ) *Generally.* In all complaint proceedings, other than those challenging the reasonableness of a rail rate based on stand-alone cost or the simplified standards, the parties shall meet, or discuss by telephone, discovery and procedural matters within 12 days after an answer to a complaint is filed. Within 19 days after an answer to a complaint is filed, the parties, either jointly or separately, shall file a report with the Board setting forth a proposed procedural schedule to govern future activities and deadlines in the case.
( b ) *Stand-alone cost or simplified standards complaints.* In complaints challenging the reasonableness of a rail rate based on stand-alone cost or the simplified standards, the parties shall meet or otherwise discuss discovery and procedural matters within 7 days after the complaint is filed in stand-alone cost cases, 3 days after the complaint is filed in Final Offer Rate Review cases, and 7 days after the mediation period ends in Simplified-SAC or Three-Benchmark cases. The parties should inform the Board as soon as possible thereafter whether there are unresolved disputes that require Board intervention and, if so, the nature of such disputes.
[82 FR 57379, Dec. 5, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 318, Jan. 4, 2023]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending August 4, 2007

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|DAKOTA FINANCIAL INC.          | * 3A1          | Dakota Financial, Inc., Alexandria, Minnesota, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the State Bank of Marietta, Marietta, Minnesota.                                                                       | Newspaper:08/17/2007Federal Register:08/17/2007        
|Newspaper:                     | 08/17/2007    
|Federal Register:              | 08/17/2007    
|NOVA EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COMPANY | Investment     | U.S. Bank, N.A., Cincinnati, Ohio, through NOVA European Holdings Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, an agreement corporation, to make indirect investments in three foreign entities, pursuant to section 211.9(f) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-86,421-01

EX P ARTE JAMES MICHAEL RES ER, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 12-0702-K 277A IN THE 368th DIS TRICT COURT F ROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim
. Ap p . 1 9 6 7). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated assault with a deadly wea pon (count one) and illega l restra int (coun t t wo ). He was sentenc ed to fiftee n y ear s’ imprisonment in count one and ten y ear s’ imprisonment in count two. The Third Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. Reser v. State , No. 03-15-00469- CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 25, 2016) (not designated f or publication). Applicant contends, inter alia , that his retai n ed ap p ellate counsel rende red ineffe ctive2

assistance beca

use counsel missed filing deadlines resulting in the appellate court issuing mandate in this cause . Applicant further contends that counsel’s actions deprive d him of the opportunity to pursue a petition for discre tionary revie w. The trial court, based upon the rec ord, finds that appellate counsel missed the deadline for filing a petition for discretionar y revie w and the time for filing any motion for extension of time, thus depriving Applicant of the opportunity to pursue a petition for discretionar y revie w. The trial court
rec ommends that relief be g rante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim
. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Third Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 03-15-00469- CR that aff

irmed his conviction in Cause No. 1 2 -0702-K277 from the 368th District Court of Wil liamson County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: Marc h 8, 2017 Do not publish
§ 1005.6 Processing of salvage. ( a ) Whenever baggage or material, goods, or other property transported by a carrier subject to the provisions herein contained is damaged or alleged to be damaged and is, as a consequence thereof, not delivered or is rejected or refused upon tender thereof to the owner, consignee, or person entitled to receive such property, the carrier, after giving due notice, whenever practicable to do so, to the owner and other parties that may have an interest therein, and unless advised to the contrary after giving such notice, shall undertake to sell or dispose of such property directly or by the employment of a competent salvage agent. The carrier shall only dispose of the property in a manner that will fairly and equally protect the best interests of all persons having an interest therein. The carrier shall make an itemized record sufficient to identify the property involved so as to be able to correlate it to the shipment or transportation involved, and claim, if any, filed thereon. The carrier also shall assign to each lot of such property a successive lot number and note that lot number on its record of shipment and claim, if any claim is filed thereon.
( b ) Whenever disposition of salvage material or goods shall be made directly to an agent or employee of a carrier or through a salvage agent or company in which the carrier or one or more of its directors, officers, or managers has any interest, financial or otherwise, that carrier's salvage records shall fully reflect the particulars of each such transaction or relationship, or both, as the case may be.
( c ) Upon receipt of a claim on a shipment on which salvage has been processed in the manner hereinbefore prescribed, the carrier shall record in its claim file thereon the lot number assigned, the amount of money recovered, if any, from the disposition of such property, and the date of transmittal of such money to the person or persons lawfully entitled to receive the same.
[37 FR 4258, Mar. 1, 1972]