alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Amendment  No.  3 to the
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No.  333-32241) of Compositech Ltd. and in the
related  Prospectus of our report dated  February 13, 1998,  with respect to the
financial  statements of Compositech  Ltd.  included in this Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Melville, New York
March 31, 1998
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6583

RICHARD WITHERSPOON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JULIAN L. WALTERS; MICHAEL G. HARDING; TIMOTHY

V. CUMMINGS; DANNY R. BEACHUM; CLYDE LEAR;

JAMES C. CALDWELL, Chief; CITY OF NORTH

CHARLESTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-95-581-2-23)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr.,

STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order entering judgment

for Defendants in accordance with a jury's verdict returned in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action alleging excessive use of force during the execution of a lawful search warrant. We have reviewed the

record and other materials before us and find no reversible error.

The parties' versions of events were contradictory. We will not

disturb the jury's credibility determination in favor of Defendants, nor will we weigh the evidence anew. See United States v.

Saunders, 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Timothy Gaylord, Chief Executive Officer of Capital Directions, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)       The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
               2002 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
               requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
               Act of 1934; and

     (2)       The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
               the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
               Capital Directions, Inc.



     Date:  March 31, 2003                            /s/  Timothy P. Gaylord
            --------------                            --------------------------
                                                      Timothy Gaylord
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Capital Directions, Inc. and will be retained by Capital Directions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 22, 2011

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|READING CO-OPERATIVE BANK | Member         | Application by Reading Co-operative Bank, Reading, Massachusetts, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act and section 208.3 of Regulation H. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not applicable
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer





I, Theodore L. Tewksbury III of
Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to the requirement
set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:





(i)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:
August 6,
2009                                                                                                                                                                                         
     /s/ THEODORE L. TEWKSBURY
III


Theodore L. Tewksbury III


Chief Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
SALARY TABLE 2009-DCB 

INCORPORATING THE 2.90% GENERAL SCHEDULE INCREASE AND A LOCALITY PAYMENT OF 23.10% 

FOR THE LOCALITY PAY AREA OF WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE-NORTHERN VIRGINIA, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA 

(See http://www.opm.gov/oca/09tables/locdef.asp for definitions of locality pay areas.) 

(TOTAL INCREASE: 4.78%) 

EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2009 

Annual Rates by Grade and Step 

x Grade Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 

1 $ 21,592 $ 22,313 $ 23,031 $ 23,746 $ 24,464 $ 24,886 $ 25,595 $ 26,310 $ 26,338 $ 27,013 

2 24,277 24,854 25,657 26,338 26,633 27,416 28,199 28,981 29,764 30,547 

3 26,487 27,370 28,253 29,135 30,018 30,901 31,783 32,666 33,548 34,431 

4 29,736 30,727 31,718 32,709 33,700 34,691 35,682 36,673 37,664 38,655 

5 33,269 34,378 35,487 36,596 37,706 38,815 39,924 41,033 42,142 43,251 

6 37,084 38,320 39,556 40,792 42,028 43,263 44,499 45,735 46,971 48,207 

7 41,210 42,584 43,958 45,332 46,705 48,079 49,453 50,827 52,201 53,574 

8 45,639 47,161 48,682 50,204 51,725 53,247 54,768 56,290 57,811 59,333 

9 50,408 52,089 53,769 55,449 57,129 58,810 60,490 62,170 63,851 65,531 

10 55,512 57,362 59,212 61,063 62,913 64,763 66,613 68,463 70,313 72,164 

11 60,989 63,021 65,053 67,086 69,118 71,151 73,183 75,215 77,248 79,280 

12 73,100 75,537 77,973 80,409 82,845 85,281 87,717 90,154 92,590 95,026 

13 86,927 89,825 92,723 95,620 98,518 101,416 104,314 107,211 110,109 113,007 

14 102,721 106,145 109,570 112,995 116,419 119,844 123,269 126,693 130,118 133,543 

15 120,830 124,858 128,886 132,914 136,941 140,969 144,997 149,025 153,053 153,200 * 

* Rate limited to the rate for level IV of the Executive Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5304 (g)(1)).
§ 1244.7 Special studies. ( a ) Although routine submission of hard copy waybills is not required, the Board may order railroads to submit hard copies of the underlying waybills for special studies.
( b ) The Board may order the subject railroads to supply additional data for submitted waybill copies or records for special studies.
[46 FR 26784, May 15, 1981. Redesignated at 65 FR 37711, June 16, 2000; 85 FR 54942, Sept. 3, 2020]
#### § 1242.86 Industrial development (account XX-61-90).

These accounts pertain solely to freight service and contain no common expenses for separation herein.
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.207 Processing. ( a ) The Chief Counsel may initiate an investigation of any statement in an application and utilize in his or her evaluation any relevant facts obtained by that investigation. The Chief Counsel may solicit and accept submissions from third persons relevant to an application and will provide the applicant an opportunity to respond to all third person submissions. In evaluating an application, the Chief Counsel may consider any other source of information. The Chief Counsel on his or her own initiative may convene a hearing or conference, if he or she considers that a hearing or conference will advance his or her evaluation of the application.
( b ) The Chief Counsel may dismiss the application without prejudice if: ( 1 ) He or she determines that there is insufficient information upon which to base a determination; or
( 2 ) He or she requests additional information from the applicant and it is not submitted.
[Amdt. 107-3, 41 FR 38171, Sept. 9, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 107-24, 56 FR 8621, 8622, Feb. 28, 1991; Amdt. 107-38, 61 FR 21098, May 9, 1996; 71 FR 30067, May 25, 2006]
#### § 1242.16 Road property damaged—other (account XX-19-48).

Separate common expenses in proportion to the total common expenses assigned to freight/passenger from the following Way and Structures accounts:

Road Property Damaged—Running (XX-17-48)

Road Property Damaged—Switching (XX-18-48)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEON K. DANIELS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 1231

[ June 24, 2015 ]

Appeal o f order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Sandra K. McSorley

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502000CF004762A

.

Leon K. Danie ls, Miami, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee, and Georgina

J imenez

- Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief and remand this matter for further proceedings

consistent with Falcon v. State , 40 Fla. L. Weekly S151 (Fla. Ma r. 19, 2015), and Horsley v. State

, 160 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 2015).

Reverse d and remanded

.

W ARNER
, T

AYLOR and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 SUMMARY OF 2014 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 The 2014 Bonus Plan provides
for cash bonuses based on achievement against gross billings and adjusted EBITDA targets established by the compensation committee for fiscal 2014 and weighted 50% each. If our performance results in achievement at 100% of targeted levels, the bonus
pool will fund at the targeted amount. We must achieve at least 80% of the gross billings or adjusted EBITDA target for the bonus pool to fund with respect to that specific performance objective. If we achieve greater than 100% of specific
performance objective target, the bonus pool funds additional amounts up to a maximum of 200%. Furthermore, if we exceed our semi-annual gross billing and adjusted EBITDA targets by 50% or more, our compensation committee has the discretion to
pay up to 40% of each executive officer’s target bonus amount in the third quarter fiscal year 2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,944,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      41,920,872
<DEPRECIATION>                            (22,965,793)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,259,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     23,353,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,259,971
<SALES>                                      2,215,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,237,016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,559,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             538,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                139,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   139,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-10-0034-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	MARCH 9, 2010

	______________________________

	ELMER WHITTAKER,

Appellant

	V.

	REBECCA WHITTAKER,

Appellee

______________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2009-549,132; HON. STEPHEN JOHNSON, PRESIDING

	______________________________

***MEMORANDUM OPINION***

******______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Elmer Whittaker perfected this appeal on January 12, 2010.  The appellate record was due on or about February 11, 2010.  Both the district clerk and court reporter have filed motions to extend the time to file their records because appellant apparently failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for them, as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2) and 35.3(b)(3).  By letter dated February 22, 2010, we directed appellant to certify to this court, by March 4, 2010, that he had complied with rule of procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2).  So too was he informed that failure to meet that deadline would result in the dismissal of his appeal.  To date, this court has not received either the clerks record, the reporters record, or notification that the records have been paid for or that arrangements have been made for payment.  Nor has this court received any request to postpone the dismissal date.  Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  

Per Curiam

2
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending November 12, 2011

----

Bank Holding CompaniesRichmond          Community First Financial Group, Inc., Chapel Hill, North Carolina -- to become a bank holding company on conversion of its subsidiary thrift, Harrington Bank, FSB, Chapel Hill, to a state-chartered bank, Harrington Bank.            -Withdrawn, November 9, 2011            Richmond          Macon Financial Corporation, Franklin, North Carolina -- to become a bank holding company and to merge with Macon Bancorp, Franklin, and subsequently be renamed Macon Bancorp.            -Withdrawn, November 9, 2011            Boston          Wellesley Bancorp, Inc., Wellesley, Massachusetts -- to acquire Wellesley Bank, Wellesley, in connection with its conversion from mutual to stock form.            -Approved, November 10, 2011            Banks, Nonmember, and Miscellaneous InstitutionsSecretary          McGraw Hill Federal Credit Union, East Windsor, New Jersey -- location determination of master account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.            -Approved, November 9, 2011            Change in Bank ControlSan Francisco          Riverbank Holding Company, Spokane, Washington -- change in bank control of Riverbank Holding and its subsidiary bank, Riverbank, Spokane.            -Permitted, November 8, 2011            Extensions of TimeKansas City          Commerce Bank and Trust Holding Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Topeka, Kansas -- extension to May 8, 2011, to acquire additional shares of Commerce Bank and Trust Holding Company, Topeka, and its subsidiary bank, CoreFirst Bank & Trust.            -Granted, November 10, 2011            Atlanta          Compass Bank, Birmingham, Alabama -- extension to January 31, 2012, to establish a branch at 15580 East 104th Avenue, Commerce City, Colorado.            -Granted, November 9, 2011            MembershipSt. Louis          Macon-Atlanta State Bank, Macon, Missouri -- to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.            -Approved, November 9, 2011            Savings and Loan Holding CompaniesCleveland          Cheviot Mutual Holding Company, Cincinnati, Ohio -- to convert from mutual to stock form and to merge with and into Cheviot Financial Corp., Cheviot; and for Cheviot Financial Corp. to become a savings and loan holding company and to acquire Cheviot Savings Bank.            -Approved, November 10, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         112,985
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                56,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    137,007
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          76,599
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            77,489
<LOANS>                                        667,525
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,519,006
<DEPOSITS>                                     965,476
<SHORT-TERM>                                    74,012
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,738
<LONG-TERM>                                    176,650
<COMMON>                                         7,336
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,519,006
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 48,881
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,675
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                21,674
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                80,230
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,356
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,789
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           50,441
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  12
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 60,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,385
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,385
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.11
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,494
<LOANS-PAST>                                       751
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 8,471
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,296
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,210
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,033
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,963
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,590
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              2,200
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,090
        

</TABLE>