alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1786

To regulate fishing in certain waters of Alaska.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1995

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To regulate fishing in certain waters of Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION.

4 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘Katmai National

5 Park’’ means the national park and national preserve re6 designated, established, or expanded under section 202(2)

7 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act

8 (16 U.S.C. 410hh–1).

9 SEC. 2. DESCENDANTS’ LAND USE.

10 Local residents who are descendants of Katmai resi11 dents who lived within the boundaries of the area now des12 ignated as Katmai National Park shall be permitted, sub-
2

•HR 1786 IH

1 ject to reasonable regulations established by the Secretary

2 of the Interior, to continue their traditional fishery for red

3 fish in the Naknek Lake/Naknek River and Brooks River

4 and Iliuk Arm within Katmai National Park.

5 SEC. 3. EFFECT ON TITLE AND JURISDICTION OF TIDAL

6 AND SUBMERGED LANDS.

7 (a) TITLE.—No provision of this Act shall be con8 strued to invalidate or validate or in any other way affect

9 any claim by the State of Alaska to title to any or all

10 submerged lands, nor shall any actions taken pursuant to

11 or in accordance with this Act operate under any provision

12 or principle of the law to bar the State of Alaska from

13 asserting at any time its claim of title to any or all of

14 the submerged lands.

15 (b) JURISDICTION.—Nothing in this Act nor in any

16 actions taken pursuant to this Act shall be construed as

17 expanding or diminishing Federal or State jurisdiction, re18 sponsibility, interests, or rights in management, regula19 tion, or control over waters of the State of Alaska or sub20 merged lands under and provision of Federal or State law.

Æ
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending September 4, 2010

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|Sugar River Bancorp, MHC | * 3A1         | Application by Sugar River Bancorp, MHC, Newport, New Hampshire to become a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting shares of Sugar River Bank, Newport, New Hampshire, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                   | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method   
|---------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | --------------
|STATE STREET B&TC, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS | 35301  | 01/20/2009 | 05/03/2009     | O         | Whole/Ltd Purp

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1998
<CASH>                                             252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                       203
<INVENTORY>                                     18,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,061
<PP&E>                                          16,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,383
<SALES>                                         31,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,250
<CGS>                                           15,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    39
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)
        

</TABLE>
§ 72.05-35 Hatch covers and shifting boards. ( a ) Wood hatch covers may be used between cargo spaces. Hatch covers in other locations shall meet the requirements for deck construction noted in tables 72.05-10 (f) and (g).
( b ) Tonnage openings in “A” Class bulkheads shall be closed by means of steel plates.
HDM2011, LLC

Heather McGraw, owner

1642 E. 31st Street

Tulsa, OK 74105

918-607-1177

Email: hmcgraw1322@gmail.com

To: U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Dear Sir or Madam,

In accordance with the Public Guidance for Petitions for Exemption filed under Section

333, HDM2011, LLC requests an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations to

conduct commercial UAS operations of a DJI Phantom 3 Professional for the purpose of

aerial videography and photography in marketing real estate sales and services and

inspections.

Offering aerial photography and videography services through the use of the DJI

Phantom 3 Professional offers a more economical marketing platform for clients versus

the use of a traditional aircraft (which can cost an upwards of thousands of dollars), and

offers prospective clientele a thorough overview of the property in its entirety (full

disclosure) – a win-win for all involved.

HDM2011, LLC also believes that the commercial use of a UAS will help bolster public

safety by reducing environmental gas emissions – hereby eliminating unnecessary use

of traditional flammable fuel.

Requested CFR Exemptions

14CFR 21 H

14 CFR 45.23 (b)

14 CFR 61.113 (A) 7 (b)

14 CFR 91.7 (a)

14 CFR 91.9 (b)(2)

14 CFR 91.109

14 CFR 91.119

14 CFR 91.121

14 CFR 91.151 (a)

14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b)

14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1)
14 CFR 91.409 (a) & (b)

14 CFR 91.417 (a) & (b)

14 CFR Title 14 Chapter 1 Sub D Part 60 thru 67 - 61.1 to 61.429

How Safety Will Be Maintained

HDM2011’s pilot in command (PIC) will only fly the UAS in a safe and lawful manner as

it relates to all Federal guidelines as stated within Section 333 of the FAA Modernization

and Reform Act of 2012.

A flight log will be maintained as well as having a visual observer on hand during all

operations, and the two will communicate verbally at all times while avoiding the use of

electronic messaging or texting.

Additionally, all flight operations will be conducted over private or controlled-access

property with permission granted by the property owner or authorized representative at

all times.

In the event of a lost UAS communication or GPS signal, the UA will return will return to

a predetermined location within the controlled access property. The PIC will also abort

any flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies and will not operate the

UAS from a moving device or vehicle.

Thank you for your consideration in reviewing this application for exemption. Should you

need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Heather McGraw, owner

HDM2011, LLC
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 5, 2011

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK    | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a branch at NWC South Cobb Drive and Concord Road, Smyrna, GA.                                                                                                               | Newspaper:11/12/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 11/12/2011    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable
|S & T BANCORP, INC. | * 3A5* 3A3     | S&T Bancorp Inc., Indiana, PA, to acquire Mainline Bancorp Inc., Ebensburg,PA and its wholly owned subsidiary, Mainline National Bank, Portage, PA pursuant to Sections 3(a)3 and 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act. | Newspaper:11/27/2011Federal Register:12/05/2011    
|Newspaper:          | 11/27/2011    
|Federal Register:   | 12/05/2011    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 2, 1995 (60), Para 60.28 Adjournment]
[Page 629]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.60.28  adjournment

  On motion of Mrs. LOWEY, at 7 o'clock and 25 minutes p.m., the House 
adjourned.
```
14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates

14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1) 

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes 

the procedural requirements for the issuance of 

airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) 

(1). Given the size and limited operating area associated 

with the aircraft to be utilized by the Applicant, an exemption 

from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an 

equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of 

the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C. §44701 

(f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the 

FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement capability, and 

proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular 

UAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates 

that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in 

the restricted environment and under the conditions 

proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a 

conventional aircraft (fixed-wing or rotorcraft) operating with 

an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and 

conditions proposed. 

The sUAS to be operated hereunder is less than 5 lbs. fully 

loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no 

explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates 

exclusively within a limited radius area as set out in the pre 

flight briefing / VLOS operations. Unlike other civil aircraft, 

operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and 

monitored by both the Operator, pursuant to safety 

requirements, and under the requirements and in 

compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide 

security for the area of operation as is now done with 

conventional aircraft. These safety enhancements, which 

already apply to civil aircraft operated in connection with 

video production, provide a greater degree of safety to the

public and property owners than conventional operations

conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same 

criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to 

national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of 

operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials 

or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial 

external load.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 11, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1630

To exclude from gross income certain disability benefits received by former

police officers or firefighters.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1995

Mr. SCHAEFER (for himself, Mr. SKAGGS, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr.

MCINNIS, and Mrs. SCHROEDER) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To exclude from gross income certain disability benefits

received by former police officers or firefighters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DISABILITY BENEFITS RECEIVED BY

4 FORMER POLICE OFFICERS OR FIRE5 FIGHTERS.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Any amount to which this sec7 tion applies shall be treated for purposes of section

8 104(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as re9 ceived under a workmen’s compensation act as compensa10 tion for personal injuries or sickness.
2

•HR 1630 IH

1 (b) AMOUNTS TO WHICH SECTION APPLIES.—

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—This section shall apply to

3 any amount which is paid by an eligible State plan

4 to an individual (or to the survivors of an individual)

5 if—

6 (A) such individual was an employee of

7 any police department or fire department which

8 is organized and operated by the State main9 taining such plan or by a political subdivision of

10 such State,

11 (B) such amount is paid by reason of such

12 individual’s disability, and

13 (C) there is an admission by the employer

14 or his agent, or there is a finding or determina15 tion by a State or local workers compensation

16 board, that such disability was due to an occu17 pational injury or sickness.

18 (2) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS.—This

19 section shall not apply to—

20 (A) the portion of any benefit based on

21 length of service, age, or the employee’s con22 tribution; or

23 (B) disabilities that are presumed to be

24 work-related.
3

•HR 1630 IH

1 (c) ELIGIBLE STATE PLAN.—For purposes of this

2 section, the term ‘‘eligible State plan’’ means any plan

3 maintained by a State if such plan—

4 (1) was established on January 1, 1980, by

5 State law,

6 (2) pays disability benefits regardless of wheth7 er the disability resulted from employment, and

8 (3) does not vary the amount of disability bene9 fits on the basis of whether the disability resulted

10 from employment.

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to

12 amounts paid after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATION

      Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Diagnostic Products Corporation ("DPC") that the Quarterly Report of DPC on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of DPC at the end of such period and the
results of its operations for such period.

Dated November 8, 2004

                                          /S/ Michael Ziering
                                          --------------------------------------
                                        Michael Ziering, Chief Executive Officer

                                      /S/ James L. Brill
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      James L. Brill, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 11, 1995 (64), Para 64.30 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 584]
[Page 693]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.64.30  providing for the consideration of h.r. 584

  Mr. McINNIS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-117) the resolution (H. Res. 145) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 584) to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to convey a fish hatchery to the State of Iowa.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending March 6, 2010

|Filer                                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE FEDERATION, THE | FBSEA          | National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Seoul, Korea, to establish a representative office in New York, New York. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us