alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1113.3 Authority of officers. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The presiding officer has the authority to regulate the procedure in the hearing before him, and has authority to take all measures necessary or proper for the efficient performance of the duties assigned him. These include authority: ( i ) To hold hearings;
( ii ) to administer oaths and affirmations;
( iii ) to grant intervention;
( iv ) to accept any pleading;
( v ) to establish special rules of procedure appropriate to the effective handling of the particular proceeding;
( vi ) to examine witnesses;
( vii ) to issue subpoenas at the hearing;
( viii ) to dispose of requests for discovery;
( ix ) to hold conferences for the settlement and simplification of issues;
( x ) to rule on motions and dispose of procedural requests;
( xi ) to make initial decisions;
( xii ) to exclude any person from the hearing for contemptuous conduct; and
( xiii ) to take any other action authorized by this part, by the Administrative Procedure Act, or by the Interstate Commerce Act and related acts.
( 2 ) The presiding officer has the authority: ( i ) To terminate examination or cross-examination of repetitious or cumulative nature;
( ii ) to limit direct examination to material matters;
( iii ) to limit cross-examination to disputed material facts;
( iv ) to require that principal examination or cross-examination be conducted by one or more counsel representing similar interests in proceedings where several parties are involved;
( v ) to set reasonable schedules for the presentation of witnesses;
( vi ) and to set reasonable time limits for the examination or cross-examination of witnesses. In order to enforce this paragraph, the officer may require a clear statement on the record of the nature of the testimony to be given by any witness.
( b ) *Motions to dismiss; amendments.* ( 1 ) The presiding officer shall have power to decide any motion to dismiss the proceeding or other motion which involves final determination of the merits of the proceeding.
( 2 ) The presiding officer may grant leave to amend any application or complaint.
( c ) *Preparation of the decision by the prevailing party.* Any proceeding in which an oral hearing is held and in which the officer is able to announce his decision either: ( 1 ) On the record after the close of the taking of testimony and the hearing of arguments by the officer, or
( 2 ) By appropriate notification to the parties after the close of the hearing, may be made the subject of an initial decision prepared by a party or parties in whose favor the officer decides, within a period specified by the officer, and subject to such changes as the officer considers appropriate in the draft prepared for him.
( d ) *Recording; media coverage.* The presiding officer shall have authority to permit or to refuse to permit the recording of the hearing by means of live or delayed television or radio broadcast, or the use of a tape recorder or other electronic or photographic equipment by any person other than the official reporter.
[47 FR 49559, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52712, Oct. 8, 1996; 81 FR 8854, Feb. 23, 2016]
#### Webster *v.*Blodgett *& a.*

Payment of rent on a parol contract to lease land, and buildings to be erected thereon, for ten years, does not avoid the statute of frauds.

Assumpsit, for the breach of a patrol contract to lease to the plaintiff land, and buildings to be erected thereon, for ten years. The plaintiff alleged the payment of part of the rent in advance. Subject to the defendants’ exception, the court ruled that the payment of-part of the stipulated rent is not necessarily such part performance as will-take the case out of the statute of frauds, but is evidence which the jury may consider on that question. Verdict for the plaintiff.

*Briggs f Suse*and *Sulloway f Topliff.\*for the plaintiff.

*Morrison, Clark,*and *Patten,*for the defendants.

Bingham, J.

A parol agreement to lease land, and buildings to be erected thereon, for ten years, is a contract to convey an interest in lands, and within the statute of frauds. G. L., *c.*220, *s.*14; *c.*1, s. 20; *c.*135, *ss.*4, 12; *Moore*v. Ross, 11 N. H. 547, 552; *Whitney*v. *Swett,*22 N. H. *10; Crosby*v. *Wadsworth,*6 East 602. A parol contract for the purchase of an interest in land is not taken put of the statute of frauds by part payment. *Lane*v. *Shackford,*5 N. H. 133; *Ayer*v. *Sawkes,*11 N. H. 148; *Ham*v. *Goodrich,*37 N. H. 185; *Emery*v. *Smith,*46 N. H. 151, 155; *Luey*v. *Bundy,*9 N. H. 298; *Folsom*v. *Company,*9 N. H. 355; *Crawford*v. *Parsons,*18 N. H. 293; *Kingsley*v. *Holbrook,*45 N. H. 313; *Howe*v. *Batchelder,*49 N. H. 204.

*Verdict set aside.*

Clark and'Stanley, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending April 23, 2011

----

Bank Holding CompaniesChicago          Home Financial Bancorp, Spencer, Indiana -- to become a bank holding company and to acquire Owen Community Bank, s.b., Spencer, and to engage in insurance agency activities through OCB Insurance Agency, Inc.            -Approved, April 22, 2011            Chicago          Minier Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan w/401(k) Provisions, Minier, Illinois -- to increase its ownership of Minier Financial, Inc., Minier, and thereby increase its indirect ownership of First Farmers State Bank.            -Approved, April 20, 2011            Change in Bank ControlKansas City          BBJ Incorporated, Ord, Nebraska -- change in bank control of BBJ and its subsidiary bank, First National Bank in Ord, Ord.            -Permitted, April 21, 2011            Atlanta          North Alabama Bancshares, Inc., Hazel Green, Alabama -- change in bank control of North Alabama and its subsidiary bank, North Alabama Bank, Hazel Green.            -Permitted, April 22, 2011            Extensions of TimeRichmond          Frederick County Bank, Frederick, Maryland -- extension to April 23, 2011, to establish a branch at 103 Monocacy Boulevard, Frederick.            -Granted, April 20, 2011            Chicago          Prairieland Bancorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Bushnell, Illinois -- extension to July 7, 2011, to increase its ownership of Prairieland Bancorp, Inc., Bushnell, and thereby indirectly increase its ownership of Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Bushnell.            -Granted, April 20, 2011            San Francisco          Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California -- extension to March 3, 2012, to establish a branch in London, United Kingdom.            -Granted, April 19, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1888

To add Native American members to the Advisory Commission on

Intergovernmental Relations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 19, 1995

Mr. RICHARDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To add Native American members to the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF NATIVE AMERICANS TO ADVI4 SORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERN5 MENTAL RELATIONS.

6 (a) PURPOSE.—Section 2(1) of the Act entitled ‘‘An

7 Act to establish an Advisory Commission on Intergovern8 mental Relations’’ (42 U.S.C. 4272) is amended by strik9 ing ‘‘and local’’ and inserting ‘‘local, and tribal’’.
2

•HR 1888 IH

1 (b) MEMBERSHIP ON COMMISSION.—Section 3 of

2 such Act (42 U.S.C. 4273) is amended—

3 (1) In subsection (a)—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘twenty-six’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘thirty’’;

6 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para7 graph (6);

8 (C) by striking the period at the end of

9 paragraph (7) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

10 (D) by adding the following at the end:

11 ‘‘(8) Four appointed by the President from a panel

12 of at least eight elected American Indian or Alaska Native

13 tribal officials, of which at least four of such panel are

14 submitted by the Committee on Resources of the House

15 of Representatives and four of such panel are submitted

16 by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate.’’; and

17 (2) in subsection (b), by inserting before the pe18 riod at the end the following: ‘‘; of each class of

19 members enumerated in paragraph (8) of subsection

20 (a) of this section, not more than two shall be from

21 any one political party and not more than one shall

22 be from any one State.’’.
3

•HR 1888 IH

1 (c) QUORUM.—Section 4(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

2 4274(e)) is amended by striking ‘‘Thirteen’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘Sixteen’’.

Æ
§ 1503.635 Evidence. ( a ) *General.* A party is entitled to present the party's case or defense by oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct any cross-examination that may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( b ) *Admissibility.* A party may introduce any oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence in support of the party's case or defense. The ALJ must admit any oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence introduced by a party, but must exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.
( c ) *Hearsay evidence.* Hearsay evidence is admissible in proceedings governed by this subpart. The fact that evidence submitted by a party is hearsay goes only to the weight of the evidence and does not affect its admissibility.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 30, 1995 (53), Para 53.12 Adjournment Over]
[Page 521]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.53.12  adjournment over

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn to meet at 
12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 3, 1995.
```
Order entered August 29, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00073
- CV
IN THE ESTATE OF IRA E. TOBOLOWSKY, DECE ASED

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 17620



### O RDER
Before the Court is the Estate of Ira E

. Tobolowsky’s August 26, 2019 motion for extension of time to file its opening brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 27, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
exv10w4



 






KEY EMPLOYEE BONUS PLAN




Exhibit 10.4



The Key Employee Bonus Plan establishes a total bonus pool based on a portion of the before tax
profit that is in excess of the before tax profit required at the applicable U.S. corporate tax
rate to produce an 8% after tax return on the beginning fiscal year consolidated net equity.



The excess profit is defined as bonusable profit. The portion of this profit to be shared by
designated Key Employees is computed as follows:





	 	   	10% of first $800,000 of bonusable profit
	 
	 	   	+ 15% of $800,000 — $1,500,000 of bonusable profit
	 
	 	   	+ 20% of over $1,500,000 of bonusable profit
	 
	 	   	= Total Bonus




The bonus pool as calculated above is distributed to designated participants at percentages as
recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The total of
participant percentages is not required to equal 100%.



A list of plan participants and their respective percent share will be determined annually by the
Compensation Committee and the Chief Executive Officer will implement and administer.



The bonus is computed based on audited year-end results.



Profits realized from the sale of property or other assets are excluded from this bonus plan.



The maximum allowable bonus to a participant is 90% of the participant’s annual salary.



Unless provided for in separate employee agreements, bonuses will not be pro-rated should the
employee leave the Company prior to June 30 of each bonus year.



It is expected that the Plan will be continued indefinitely. However, the Company reserves the
right to alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan and contributions thereunder. Such
rights may be exercised by action of the Board of Directors at any time. Payment of bonuses under
this plan are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.



This Key Employee Incentive Bonus Plan is renewable by yearly affirmative action of the Board of
Directors.




	 
	By: /s/ Sherrill Stone




	Sherrill Stone

	Chief Executive Officer

	 

	January 4, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at November 30, 1995 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the twelve months ended November 30,
1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                          99,245
<RECEIVABLES>                                  977,997
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         25,772,380
<PP&E>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,605,370
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   3,437,312
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             497,590
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,670,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,605,370
<TRADING-REVENUE>                            7,557,756
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         1,623,749
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                   5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,850,743
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,695,976
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,695,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U. S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.**

 

I, Bill Rodriguez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10 – KSB of Interlink Global, Inc., a Nevada Corporation.

2. Base on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Base on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects the financial condition, result of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13 a- 15 e and 15 d – 15 e for the small business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

33

 

 

----

            5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors:

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarized and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

**By /s/ Bill Rodriguez**

**Bill Rodriguez,**

**Chief Financial Officer**

**December 11, 2008**

34

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20627

Summary Calendar

 

LEONARD R. CROOMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-1125

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonard R. Crooms, Texas prisoner # 352784, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 1361 petition for

a writ of mandamus. His notice of appeal was filed on June 17,

2003. Crooms did not obtain permission from a judge of this

court before filing his appeal, as he is required to do pursuant

to this court’s order in Crooms v. Cockrell, No. 01-21003

(5th Cir. March 28, 2002). The instant appeal is therefore

DISMISSED as improvidently filed. 
No. 03-20627

-2-

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary Name                                State of Incorporation            Name Doing Business Under
---------------                                ----------------------            -------------------------
<S>                                            <C>                                <C>
Internet Commerce, Inc.                         Florida                           Internet Commerce, Inc.

Internet Associates                                                               Internet Associates
International, Inc.                             Nevada                            International, Inc.

Connect. Ad, Inc.                               Florida                           Connect. Ad, Inc.

Connect. Ad Services, Inc.                      Florida                           Connect. Ad Services, Inc.

Connect. Ad of South Florida, Inc.              Florida                           Connect. Ad of South Florida, Inc.
</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 30, 1995 (53), Para 53.20 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 523]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.53.20  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced a bill (H.R. 1374) for the 
     relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles; which was referred to 
     the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,770,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,236,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (495,083)
<INVENTORY>                                 11,405,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,750,624
<PP&E>                                       9,565,249
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,884,968)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,555,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,704,760
<BONDS>                                      9,577,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,787,191
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,379
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,445,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,555,933
<SALES>                                     71,159,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,294,751
<CGS>                                       34,335,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,758,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             392,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,562,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (596,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,966,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,966,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.13 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1116]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.13  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. KLUG: 

       Page 25, line 6, strike ``$142,000,000'' and insert ``$0''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

108

negative

Nays

319
```
Order entered November 20, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01197-CV

WILLIAM B. BLAYLOCK, ET AL., Appellants

V.

THOMAS P. HOLLAND, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-08910

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ November 19, 2013 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a brief. Appellants shall file their brief on or before November 26, 2013.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE