alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1155.24 Environmental review. ( a ) A land-use-exemption permit generally will require the preparation of an EIS. OEA may reclassify the environmental review requirements of land-use-exemption proceedings on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to 49 CFR 1105.6(d).
( b ) An applicant for a land-use-exemption permit must submit an Environmental Report, at least 45 days prior to filing a land-use-exemption-permit application, containing the information described at 49 CFR 1105.7 to the extent applicable to solid waste rail transfer facilities. Applicants shall concurrently file a Historic Report containing the information at 49 CFR 1105.8 if applicable. The Environmental Report must also contain a discussion of the five factors for consideration listed at 49 U.S.C. 10909(d)(1) through (5) and address any associated environmental impacts as they relate to the facility for which a land-use-exemption permit is sought.
( c ) The Board strongly encourages applicants to use third-party contractors to assist OEA in preparing the appropriate environmental documentation in land-use-exemption-permit proceedings. *See* 49 CFR 1105.10(d). The environmental reporting requirements outlined above that would otherwise apply are waived if an applicant hires a third-party contractor, OEA approves the scope of the contractor's work, and the contractor works under OEA's direct supervision. *See* 49 CFR 1105.10(d). If an applicant does not hire an independent third-party contractor, the Board may hire a third-party contractor and charge the costs for the contractor to the applicant. *See* 49 U.S.C. 10909(h).
( d ) The Board's procedures set forth in 49 CFR 1105.10 for implementation of environmental laws are controlling unless superseded by provisions in this Part.
( e ) An applicant for a land-use-exemption permit must follow the Board's procedures at 49 CFR 1105.9 for compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 through 1465, if that act is applicable.
Exhibit
32.1








HARLEYSVILLE
NATIONAL CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Harleysville National Corporation (the “Corporation”)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Paul D. Geraghty, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            To
      my knowledge the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the
      Report.











/s/ Paul D. Geraghty


Paul D.
Geraghty


President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director


Harleysville
National Corporation





Date: November
9, 2009














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Harleysville National Corporation and will
be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Aloha, Nani Kahinu <kuuleinanz@hotmail.com> Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:14 PM EAS (OST) Kalaupapa EAS ··- ! .. '

I am writingto support MokuleleAirline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lowerfares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple islands and ease ofbookingvia Global Distribition System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.) It is importantwe have safe, stable, 

### & affordable service to Kalaupapa. Please select Mokuleleto serve Kalaupapa. Mahalo, Nani Kahinu

1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David D. Hood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David D. HoodName:

David D. HoodTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




November 12, 2004



---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RICKEY BILLS, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11414 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

DANIEL HEYNS et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT DANIEL HEYNS (ECF #17) 

 Plaintiff Rickey Bills (“Bills”) is a Michigan state prisoner incarcerated at 

the Muskegon Correctional Facility in Muskegon, Michigan. In this action, Bills 

alleges, among other things, that certain prison employees and officials violated his 

constitutional rights. 

 On May 31, 2016, Bills filed two documents with this Court. First, Bills 

filed a motion titled “Motion to Dismiss Defendant Heyns” (the “Motion”). (See 

ECF #17.) In the Motion, Bills asks the Court to dismiss the claims he brought 

against Defendant Daniel Heyns (“Heyns”). (See id.) Second, Bills filed a First 

Amended Complaint. (See ECF #18.) In the First Amended Complaint, Bills has 

neither named Heyns as a Defendant nor brought any claims against Heyns. (See 

2:15-cv-11414-MFL-DRG Doc # 19 Filed 06/20/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 233
2

id.) 

 Therefore, because Bills is no longer pursuing any claims against Heyns, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the Motion (ECF #17) is GRANTED and (2) 

Heyns shall be removed from the docket as a Defendant in this action. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: June 20, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on June 20, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-11414-MFL-DRG Doc # 19 Filed 06/20/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 234
#### Mary E. Mosher, *Appellant, v.*The City of Auburn, *Respondent*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, March 13, 1995 (43), Para 43.8 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 375]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.43.8  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 29: Mr. Baker of Louisiana.
       H.R. 117: Mr. Heineman and Mr. Weller.
       H.R. 230: Mr. Livingston.
       H.R. 612: Mr. Lipinski.
       H.R. 678: Mr. Burton of Indiana.
       H.R. 682: Mr. Weller.
       H.R. 860: Mr. Packard.
       H.R. 902: Mr. McCrery and Mr. Fattah.
       H.R. 922: Mr. Serrano and Mr. Hilliard.
       H.R. 969: Mr. Yates, Mr. LaFalce, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Bryant 
     of Texas, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Evans, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Wyden, 
     and Mr. Sanders.
       H.R. 1145: Mr. Stupak and Mr. Berman.
       H.J. Res. 61: Mr. Bunn of Oregon.
       H.J. Res. 70: Mr. Scott, Mr. Tucker, Ms. Jackson-Lee, Ms. 
     Waters, Mr. Franks of Connecticut, Mr. Flake, Mrs. Clayton, 
     Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, 
     and Mr. Fattah.
       H. Con. Res. 12: Mr. Ney and Mr. Crapo.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00009

- CV

IN RE C.J.Y. II

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA02426 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See

T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. The notice of appeal was filed on January 7, 2020. The reporter’s record was originally due on January 17, 2020. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1(b) (requiring the appellate record in an accelerated appeal to be filed within ten days after the notice of appeal is filed)

.

On January 27, 2020, t he court reporter filed a notification of late record requesting an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The extension is GRANTED. The reporter’s

record is due on or before February 7, 2020

. However, g iven the t ime constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 31st day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 4, 2012

|Filer                        | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CAPE COD FIVE MUTUAL COMPANY | * 3A1       | Application by Cape Cod Five Mutual Company, Harwich Port, Massachusetts, to establish a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank, Harwich Port, Massachusetts.  The filing was submitted pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:02/23/2012Federal Register:02/27/2012
|Newspaper:                   | 02/23/2012 
|Federal Register:            | 02/27/2012 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 10.6.6
 MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
 2008 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
  Name of Participant:Total Number of Restricted Stock Units Awarded:Award Date:
  Vesting Date
    
    Percentage of RSUs Vested
  PARTICIPANT
    
    MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATEDBy:Print Name
    
   
    
   


    Print Name:Address:
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:




---



##### 



MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
 Incorporated Terms and Conditions
 Plan Incorporated by Reference
 Vesting of RSUs
 Award and Restricted Stock Units Not Transferable
 Termination of Employment or Engagement
 No Right to Shares or as a Stockholder
 Timing and Manner of Payment of Restricted Stock Units




---



##### 



Payment of Taxes
 Securities and Other Laws
 Limitation on Participants Rights
 Data Privacy




---



##### 



Electronic Delivery and Acceptance
 Notices
 Entire Agreement
 Construction
 Governing Law
 Severability
 Imposition of Other Requirements
 Counterparts
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVONDALE
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          81,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,226
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,868
<PP&E>                                         264,537
<DEPRECIATION>                               (134,481)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,644
<BONDS>                                         51,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,615
<SALES>                                        613,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               613,993
<CGS>                                          538,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  538,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.85
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1242.81 Joint facility—debit and credit (accounts 37-55-00 and 38-55-00).

Solely related freight and passenger service debit expense accounts shall be assigned according to the use made of each facility by the reporting carriers, regardless of the use made of the facility by other carriers. Common debit expenses shall be separated on the basis of the percentage separation of the solely related expenses. If there are no solely related expenses or if the solely related expenses are assigned entirely to either freight or passenger service, separate common expenses on the same percentages calculated for the separation of administration (account XX-55-01).

Separate common credit expenses on the basis of the percentages calculated for the separation of administration (account XX-55-01).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 26, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2012 (January 1, 2012 - March 31, 2012)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 29, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

The following are subsidiaries of PMR Corporation and their state of
incorporation or organization.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                           State
----                                                           -----
<S>                                                            <C>
Neuroscience Pharmaceutical Network, Inc.                      Delaware
Twin Town Corporation                                          California
Psychiatric Management Resources, Inc.                         California
Collaborative Care, Inc.                                       California
Collaborative Care Corporation                                 Tennessee
Business Office Solutions Corporation                          Delaware
Stadt Solutions, LLC                                           Delaware
  (PMR Corporation owns a 50.1% interest in Stadt
  Solutions, LLC)
</TABLE>



                                       1.
§ 1177.1 Definitions and classifications of documents. ( a ) A “primary document” is a mortgage (excluding those under the Ship Mortgage Act of 1920, as amended—46 U.S.C. *et seq.*), lease, equipment trust agreement, conditional sales agreement, assignment of a lease or leases which have not previously been filed, or other instrument evidencing the mortgage, lease, conditional sale, or bailment of one or more vessels operated subject to Surface Transportation Board jurisdiction, railroad cars, locomotives, or other rolling stock for a use related to interstate commerce.
( b ) A “secondary document” is any assignment of rights or interest, supplement, or amendment to any primary or other secondary document. These include releases, discharges, or satisfactions, either total or partial.
#### § 7.105 Marquesas Keys, FL to Rio Grande, TX.

A line drawn from Marquesas Keys, Florida at approximate position latitude 24°47.5′ N, longitude 82°11.2′ W; along the 12-mile line which marks the seaward limits of the territorial sea (as defined in 33 CFR 2.22(a)(1)) to Rio Grande, Texas at approximate position latitude 25°58.6′ N, longitude 96°55.5′ W.

[USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42602, July 18, 2003]
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.05-5 To whom issued.

(a) Such permit will only be issued upon the written application of the master, owner, or agent of the vessel.
§ 1180.20 Procedures. ( a ) Transactions under 11 U.S.C. 1172, for the transfer or operation of lines of bankrupt railroads under a plan of reorganization are governed by the following procedures: ( 1 ) If the buyer or operator is not a carrier, the Notice of Exemption procedures in subpart D of part 1150 of this title.
( 2 ) If the buyer or operator is a carrier, either: ( i ) The application procedures in subpart A of this part; or,
( ii ) The procedures in part 1121 of this title for a petition to exempt the transaction from prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323 *et seq.*
( b ) The Board will establish or modify its existing procedures and deadlines as necessary in each proceeding to comply with appropriate orders of the Bankruptcy Court.
( c ) Under 11 U.S.C. 1172(c)(1), the Board is required to provide affected employees with adequate protection. The Board will impose the minimum levels required by 49 U.S.C. 11326, unless a need is shown for greater levels of protection.
( d ) All applications, notices, and petitions for exemption within the scope of § 1180.20(a) shall advise the Board that the proposed transaction involves the transfer or operation of lines in reorganization.
[57 FR 57112, Dec. 3, 1992; 57 FR 61585, Dec. 28, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 9717, Mar. 4, 1997]