This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices to the public of the proposed

issuance of rules and regulations. The

purpose of these notices is to give interested

persons an opportunity to participate in the

rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules.

Proposed Rules Federal Register

38027 

Vol. 72, No. 133 

Thursday, July 12, 2007 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 915 

[Docket No. AO–254–A10; AMS–FV–06– 

0220; FV06–915–2] 

Avocados Grown in South Florida; 

Secretary’s Decision and Referendum 

Order on Proposed Amendment of 

Marketing Agreement No. 121 and 

Order No. 915 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service 

(AMS), USDA. 

ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum 

order. 

SUMMARY: This decision proposes 

amendments to Marketing Agreement 

No. 121 and Order No. 915 (order), 

which regulate avocados grown in 

South Florida, and provides growers 

with the opportunity to vote in a 

referendum to determine if they favor 

the changes. The amendments are based 

on those proposed by the Florida 

Avocado Administrative Committee 

(Committee), which is responsible for 

local administration of the order. The 

amendments would: Add authority for 

the Committee to borrow funds; revise 

voting requirements for changing the 

assessment rate; allow for District 1 

nominations to be conducted by mail; 

and add authority for the Committee to 

accept voluntary contributions. The 

proposed amendments are intended to 

improve the operation and functioning 

of the marketing order program. 

DATES: The referendum will be 

conducted from July 23 through August 

6, 2007. The representative period for 

the purpose of the referendum is April 

1, 2006, through March 31, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marc McFetridge or Melissa 

Schmaedick, Marketing Specialists, 

Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 

Marketing Order Administration Branch 

(MOAB), AMS, USDA, 1400 

Independence Ave., SW., Washington, 

DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 

2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or e-mail: 

Marc.McFetridge@usda.gov or 

Melissa.Schmaedick@usda.gov. 

Small businesses may request 

information on this proceeding by 

contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order 

Administration Branch, Fruit and 

Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, 

Washington, DC 20250–0237; 

Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202) 

720–8938, or e-mail: 

Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior 

documents in this proceeding: Notice of 

Hearing issued on July 18, 2006, and 

published in the July 24, 2006, issue of 

the Federal Register (71 FR 41740), and 

a Recommended Decision issued on 

March 23, 2007, and published in the 

March 30, 2007, issue of the Federal 

Register (72 FR 15056). 

This action is governed by the 

provisions of sections 556 and 557 of 

Title 5 of the United States Code and is 

therefore excluded from the 

requirements of Executive Order 12866. 

Preliminary Statement 

The proposed amendments are based 

on the record of a public hearing held 

August 16, 2006, in Homestead, Florida. 

The hearing was held to consider such 

amendments to the order. The hearing 

was held pursuant to the provisions of 

the Agricultural Marketing Agreement 

Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.), hereinafter referred to as the 

‘‘Act,’’ and the applicable rules of 

practice and procedure governing the 

formulation of marketing agreements 

and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900). 

The Notice of Hearing was published in 

the Federal Register on July 24, 2006 

(71 FR 41740), and contained 

amendment proposals submitted by the 

Committee. 

The amendments included in this 

decision would: 

1. Add the authority for the 

Committee to borrow funds; 

2. Revise the voting requirements for 

changing the assessment rate; 

3. Allow the District 1 nominations to 

be conducted by mail; and 

4. Add the authority for the 

Committee to accept voluntary 

contributions. 

In addition, AMS proposed to make 

changes as may be necessary to the 

order, if any of the proposed changes are 

adopted, so that all of the order’s 

provisions conform to the effectuated 

amendments. To the extent necessary, 

conforming changes have been 

identified and made to the amendments. 

Upon the basis of evidence 

introduced at the hearing and the record 

thereof, the Administrator of AMS on 

March 23, 2007, filed with the Hearing 

Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a 

Recommended Decision and 

Opportunity to File Written Exceptions 

thereto by April 30, 2007. That 

document also announced AMS’s intent 

to request approval of new information 

collection requirements to implement 

the program. Written exceptions on the 

proposed information collection 

requirements were due by May 29, 2007. 

None were filed. 

Small Business Consideration 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth 

in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 

AMS has considered the economic 

impact of this action on small entities. 

Accordingly, AMS has prepared this 

final regulatory flexibility analysis. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

business subject to such actions so that 

small businesses will not be unduly or 

disproportionately burdened. Marketing 

orders and amendments thereto are 

unique in that they are normally 

brought about through group action of 

essentially small entities for their own 

benefit. 

Small agricultural producers have 

been defined by the Small Business 

Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) 

as those having annual receipts of less 

than $750,000. Small agricultural 

service firms, which include handlers 

regulated under the order, are defined as 

those with annual receipts of less than 

$6,500,000. 

Avocado Industry Background and 

Overview 

The record indicates that there are an 

estimated 352 producers of avocados in 

the production area and 32 handlers 

subject to regulation under the order. 

According to the National 

Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) 

and Committee data, the average price 

for Florida avocados during the 2005–06 

season was around $46.75 per 55-pound 

bushel container, and total shipments 

were near 470,000 55-pound bushel 

equivalent. Using this average price and 

shipment information, the majority of 

avocado handlers could be considered 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
38028 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

small businesses under the SBA 

definition. In addition, based on 

avocado production, grower prices, and 

the total number of Florida avocado 

growers, the average annual grower 

revenue is less than $750,000. Thus, the 

majority of Florida avocado producers 

may also be classified as small entities. 

The NASS reported that in 2005, total 

Florida avocado bearing acres were 

5,300 and the average yield per acre was 

2.26 tons. The total Florida production 

reported in 2005 was 12,000 tons, with 

growers receiving an average (farm gate) 

price of $940/ton. The estimated total 

value of 2005 Florida avocado 

production was $11.28 million. 

Over the past 30 years the U.S. 

avocado industry has seen many 

changes. According to NASS, the total 

U.S. production acres for avocados have 

decreased by 13 percent, from 78,000 

acres in 1982 to 67,600 acres in 2005. 

Prices have trended upward from 1959 

to 2005, although there has been 

significant variability in prices from 

year to year. The average grower price 

for the U.S. in 1959 was $109 per ton 

and in 2005 the average grower price 

was $1,280 per ton. The total value of 

U.S. avocado production has increased 

dramatically since 1959, reaching a peak 

of $394 million in 2003. The per capital 

consumption of fresh avocados has risen 

significantly since 1970. Between 1970 

and 2004, per capital consumption 

increased almost five-fold to 2.9 pounds 

per person in 2004. According to the 

hearing record, one of the factors that 

may be contributing to this increase is 

the new year-round availability of 

avocados due to the volume of imported 

avocados in addition to domestically 

produced avocados. 

Comparatively, Florida’s avocado 

industry has seen similar trends. 

According to NASS, the production 

acreage has decreased by 53 percent 

over the last three decades. According to 

record evidence, the rapid decrease in 

Florida production acreage compared to 

that of U.S. acreage can be directly 

associated with crop damage resulting 

from recent hurricanes. Florida’s 

production trended upward to 34,700 

tons in the early 1980’s and has shown 

great variability since. Production in 

2005 was at a 10 year low of 12,000 

tons. After Hurricane Andrew, which 

affected the value of production in 1992 

and 1993, the value of Florida’s 

production has ranged from a high of 

$17.2 million in 2003 to a low of $11.3 

million in 2005. 

Material Issues 

The amendments included in this 

decision would: Add authority for the 

Committee to borrow funds; revise 

voting requirements for changing the 

assessment rate; allow for District 1 

nominations to be conducted by mail; 

and add authority for the Committee to 

accept voluntary contributions. 

The proposals set forth in this 

Decision would streamline program 

organization, but are not expected to 

result in a significant change in industry 

production, handling or distribution 

activities. In discussing the impacts of 

the proposed amendments on growers 

and handlers, record evidence indicates 

that the changes are expected to be 

positive because the administration of 

the programs would be more efficient, 

and therefore more effective, in 

executing Committee duties and 

responsibilities. There would be no 

significant cost impact on either small 

or large growers or handlers. 

Interested persons were invited to 

present evidence at the hearing on the 

probable regulatory and informational 

impact of the proposed amendments to 

the order on small entities. In addition, 

the Recommended Decision invited 

exceptions from interested persons on 

the information collection burden. None 

were received. The record evidence is 

that the amendments are designed to 

increase efficiency in the functioning of 

the order. 

USDA has not identified any relevant 

Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or 

conflict with this proposed rule. These 

amendments are designed to enhance 

the administration and functioning of 

the order to benefit the South Florida 

avocado industry. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), this notice announces that 

AMS is seeking approval from OMB for 

a new information collection request for 

Avocados Grown in South Florida, 

Marketing Order No. 915, under OMB 

No. 0581-NEW. Upon OMB approval, 

the additional burden will be merged 

into the information collection currently 

approved under OMB No. 0581–0189, 

‘‘Generic OMB Fruit Crops.’’

Title: Avocados Grown in South 

Florida, Marketing Order No. 915. 

OMB No.: 0581-NEW. 

Expiration Date of Approval: Three 

years from OMB date of approval. 

Type of Request: New collection. 

Abstract: The information collection 

requirement in this request is essential 

to provide growers and handlers with 

ballots so that nominations for the 

Committee can be conducted by mail. 

This information collected is used 

only by authorized representatives of 

USDA, including AMS, Fruit and 

Vegetable Programs regional and 

headquarters’ staff, and authorized 

employees and agents of the Committee. 

Authorized Committee employees, 

agents, and the industry are the primary 

users of the information and AMS is the 

secondary user. 

Grower Ballot To Nominate Members 

and Alternate Members for District 1 or 

District 2 

Avocado growers would use this 

ballot to nominate members and 

alternative members, either for District 1 

or District 2 (whichever is applicable), 

to serve on the Committee. The ballot 

would be used when voting by mail. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 0.083 hour per 

response. 

Respondents: Avocado growers. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

352. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 1. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 29 hours. 

Handler Ballot To Nominate Members 

and Alternate Members for District 1 or 

District 2 

Avocado handlers would use this 

ballot to nominate members and 

alternate members for either District 1 or 

District 2 (whichever is applicable), to 

serve on the Committee. This ballot 

would be used when voting by mail. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 0.083 hour per 

response. 

Respondents: Avocado handlers. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

32. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 1. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 3 hours. 

The Committee recommended 

amending the nomination process to 

allow for District 1 nominations to be 

conducted by mail. 

As with all Federal marketing order 

programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the Government Paperwork Elimination 

Act (GPEA), which requires Government 

agencies in general to provide the public 

the option of submitting information or 

transacting business electronically to 

the maximum extent possible. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the Internet and other 

information technologies to provide 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules 38029 

1This order shall not become effective unless and 

until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of 

practice and procedure governing proceeding to 

formulate marketing agreements and marketing 

orders have been met. 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

Civil Justice Reform 

The amendments to Marketing Order 

915 proposed herein have been 

reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 

Civil Justice Reform. They are not 

intended to have retroactive effect. If 

adopted, the proposed amendments 

would not preempt any State or local 

laws, regulations, or policies, unless 

they present an irreconcilable conflict 

with this proposal. 

The Act provides that administrative 

proceedings must be exhausted before 

parties may file suit in court. Under 

section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any 

handler subject to an order may file 

with USDA a petition stating that the 

order, any provision of the order, or any 

obligation imposed in connection with 

the order is not in accordance with law 

and request a modification of the order 

or to be exempted therefrom. A handler 

is afforded the opportunity for a hearing 

on the petition. After the hearing, USDA 

would rule on the petition. The Act 

provides that the district court of the 

United States in any district in which 

the handler is an inhabitant, or has his 

or her principal place of business, has 

jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on 

the petition, provided an action is filed 

no later than 20 days after the date of 

the entry of the ruling. 

Findings and Conclusions 

The findings and conclusions, rulings, 

and general findings and determinations 

included in the Recommended Decision 

set forth in the March 30, 2007 issue of 

the Federal Register are hereby 

approved and adopted. 

Marketing Agreement and Order 

Annexed hereto and made a part 

hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order 

Amending the Order Regulating the 

Handling of Avocados Grown in 

Florida.’’ This document has been 

decided upon as the detailed and 

appropriate means of effectuating the 

foregoing findings and conclusions. 

It is hereby ordered, That this entire 

decision be published in the Federal 

Register. 

Referendum Order 

It is hereby directed that a referendum 

be conducted in accordance with the 

procedure for the conduct of referenda 

(7 CFR part 900.400 et seq.) to 

determine whether the annexed order 

amending the order regulating the 

handling of avocados grown in Florida 

is approved or favored by growers, as 

defined under the terms of the order, 

who during the representative period 

were engaged in the production of 

avocados in the production area. 

The representative period for the 

conduct of such referendum is hereby 

determined to be April 1, 2006, through 

March 31, 2007. 

The agents of the Secretary to conduct 

such referendum are hereby designated 

to be William G. Pimental and Christian 

D. Nissen, Southeast Marketing Field 

Office, Marketing Order Administration 

Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 

AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–

3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or E-mail: 

William.Pimental@usda.gov or 

Christian.Nissen@usda.gov, 

respectively. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915 

Avocados, Marketing agreements, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: July 9, 2007. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

Order Amending the Order Regulating 

the Handling of Avocados Grown in 

Florida 1

Findings and Determinations 

The findings and determinations 

hereinafter set forth are supplementary 

to the findings and determinations 

which were previously made in 

connection with the issuance of the 

marketing agreement and order; and all 

said previous findings and 

determinations are hereby ratified and 

affirmed, except insofar as such findings 

and determinations may be in conflict 

with the findings and determinations set 

forth herein. 

(a) Findings and Determinations Upon 

the Basis of the Hearing Record. 

Pursuant to the provisions of the 

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 

of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), and the applicable rules of 

practice and procedure effective 

thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public 

hearing was held upon the proposed 

amendments to the Marketing 

Agreement No. 121 and Order No. 915 

(7 CFR part 915), regulating the 

handling of avocados grown in Florida. 

Upon the basis of the evidence 

introduced at such hearing and the 

record thereof, it is found that: 

(1) The marketing agreement and 

order, as amended, and as hereby 

proposed to be further amended, and all 

of the terms and conditions thereof, 

would tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act; 

(2) The marketing agreement and 

order, as amended, and as hereby 

proposed to be further amended, 

regulate the handling of avocados grown 

in the production area in the same 

manner as, and are applicable only to, 

persons in the respective classes of 

commercial and industrial activity 

specified in the marketing agreement 

and order upon which a hearing has 

been held; 

(3) The marketing agreement and 

order, as amended, and as hereby 

proposed to be further amended, are 

limited to their application to the 

smallest regional production area which 

is practicable, consistent with carrying 

out the declared policy of the Act, and 

the issuance of several orders applicable 

to subdivisions of the production area 

would not effectively carry out the 

declared policy of the Act; 

(4) The marketing agreement and 

order, as amended, and as hereby 

proposed to be further amended, 

prescribe, insofar as practicable, such 

different terms applicable to different 

parts of the production area as are 

necessary to give due recognition to the 

differences in the production and 

marketing of avocados grown in the 

production area; and 

(5) All handling of avocados grown in 

the production area as defined in the 

marketing agreement and order, is in the 

current of interstate or foreign 

commerce or directly burdens, 

obstructs, or affects such commerce. 

Order Relative to Handling 

It is therefore ordered, That on and 

after the effective date hereof, all 

handling of avocados grown in Florida 

shall be in conformity to, and in 

compliance with, the terms and 

conditions of the said order as hereby 

proposed to be amended as follows: 

The provisions of the proposed 

marketing agreement and order 

amending the order contained in the 

Recommended Decision issued by the 

Administrator on March 23, 2007, and 

published in the Federal Register (72 

FR 15056) on March 30, 2007, will be 

and are the terms and provisions of this 

order amending the order and are set 

forth in full herein. 

PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN 

SOUTH FLORIDA 

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 915 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

2. In § 915.11, paragraphs (a) and (b) 

are revised to read as follows: 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
38030 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

§ 915.11 District. 

* * * * * 

(a) District 1 shall include MiamiDade County. 

(b) District 2 shall include all of the 

production area except Miami-Dade 

County. 

3. In § 915.22, paragraph (b)(1) is 

revised to read as follows: 

§ 915.22 Nomination. 

(a) * * * 

(b) Successor members. (1) The 

Committee shall hold or cause to be 

held a meeting or meetings of growers 

and handlers in each district to 

designate nominees for successor 

members and alternate members of the 

Committee; or the Committee may 

conduct nominations in Districts 1 and 

2 by mail in a manner recommended by 

the Committee and approved by the 

Secretary. Such nominations shall be 

submitted to the Secretary by the 

Committee not later than March 1 of 

each year. The Committee shall 

prescribe procedural rules, not 

inconsistent with the provisions of this 

section, for the conduct of nomination. 

* * * * * 

4. In § 915.30, paragraph (c) is revised 

to read as follows: 

§ 915.30 Procedure. 

* * * * * 

(c) For any recommendation of the 

Committee for an assessment rate 

change, a quorum of seven Committee 

members and a two-thirds majority vote 

of approval of those in attendance is 

required. 

5. In § 915.41, paragraph (b) is revised 

to read as follows: 

§ 915.41 Assessments. 

* * * * * 

(b) The Secretary shall fix the rate of 

assessment per 55-pounds of fruit or 

equivalent in any container or in bulk, 

to be paid by each such handler. At any 

time during or after a fiscal year, the 

Secretary may increase the rate of 

assessment, in order to secure sufficient 

funds to cover any later finding by the 

Secretary relative to the expense which 

may be incurred. Such increase shall be 

applied to all fruit handled during the 

applicable fiscal year. In order to 

provide funds for the administration of 

the provisions of this part, the 

Committee may accept the payment of 

assessments in advance, or borrow 

money on an emergency short-term 

basis. The authority of the Committee to 

borrow money is subject to approval of 

the Secretary and may be used only to 

meet financial obligations as the 

obligations occur or to allow the 

Committee to adjust its reserve funds to 

meet such obligations. 

6. Add a new § 915.43 to read as 

follows: 

§ 915.43 Contributions. 

The Committee may accept voluntary 

contributions. Such contributions shall 

be free from any encumbrances by the 

donor and the Committee shall retain 

complete control of their use. 

7. Revise § 915.45 to read as follows: 

§ 915.45 Production research, marketing 

research and development. 

The committee may, with the 

approval of the Secretary, establish or 

provide for the establishment of 

production research, marketing research 

and development projects designed to 

assist, improve or promote the 

marketing, distribution, and 

consumption or efficient production of 

avocados. Such products may provide 

for any form of marketing promotion, 

including paid advertising. The 

expenses of such projects shall be paid 

from funds collected pursuant to the 

applicable provisions of § 915.41, or 

from such other funds as approved by 

the USDA. 

[FR Doc. 07–3408 Filed 7–9–07; 4:32 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

10 CFR Part 50 

[Docket No. PRM–50–87] 

Raymond A. Crandall; Receipt of 

Petition for Rulemaking 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; notice 

of receipt. 

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has received and 

requests public comment on a petition 

for rulemaking dated May 17, 2007, 

filed by Raymond A. Crandall 

(petitioner). The petition was docketed 

by the NRC and has been assigned 

Docket No. PRM–50–87. The petitioner 

is requesting that the NRC amend the 

regulations that govern domestic 

licensing of production and utilization 

facilities to eliminate the specific 

criteria related to the radiological doses 

for control room habitability at nuclear 

power plants. The petitioner believes 

that the current deterministic 

radiological dose requirements for 

control room habitability have resulted 

in several negative safety consequences, 

including an increased risk to public 

safety. 

DATES: Submit comments by September 

25, 2007. Comments received after this 

date will be considered if it is practical 

to do so, but assurance of consideration 

cannot be given except as to comments 

received on or before this date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any one of the following methods. 

Please include the following number 

(PRM–50–87) in the subject line of your 

comments. Comments on petitions 

submitted in writing or in electronic 

form will be made available for public 

inspection. Because your comments will 

not be edited to remove any identifying 

or contact information, the NRC 

cautions you against including personal 

information such as social security 

numbers and birth dates in your 

submission. 

Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555. Attention: 

Rulemaking and Adjudications staff. 

E-mail comments to: SECY@nrc.gov. If 

you do not receive a reply e-mail 

confirming that we have received your 

comments, contact us directly at (301) 

415–1966. You may also submit 

comments via the NRC’s rulemaking 

website at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov. 

Address comments about our 

rulemaking website to Carol Gallagher, 

(301) 415–5905; (e-mail cag@nrc.gov). 

Comments can also be submitted via the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Hand deliver comments to 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 

between 7:30 am and 4:15 pm on 

Federal workdays. 

Publicly available documents related 

to this petition may be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

located at the NRC Public Document 

Room (PDR), O1 F21, One White Flint 

North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. The PDR reproduction 

contractor will copy documents for a 

fee. Selected documents, including 

comments, may be viewed and 

downloaded electronically via the NRC 

rulemaking Web site at http:// 

ruleforum.llnl.gov. 

Publicly available documents created 

or received at the NRC after November 

1, 1999 are also available electronically 

at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. From this site, the public 

can gain entry into the NRC’s 

Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS), which 

provides text and image files of NRC’s 

public documents. If you do not have 

access to ADAMS or if there are 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS