alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 17, 1995 (68), Para 68.3 Communications]
[Page 749]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.68.3  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       879. A letter from the General Counsel of the Department of 
     Defense, transmitting a draft of proposed legislation to 
     amend the Army National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 
     1992 and to make certain provisions of such act applicable to 
     the Selected Reserve of the Army, and for other purposes; to 
     the Committee on National Security.
       880. A letter from the Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance 
     Corporation, transmitting a report on the Corporation's 
     efforts to maximize the efficient utilization of the 
     resources of the private sector, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1827; 
     to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services.
       881. A letter from the Assistant Secretary for Legislative 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting notification of a 
     proposed manufacturing license agreement for production of 
     major military equipment with Australia (Transmittal No. DTC-
     23-95), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2776(d); to the Committee on 
     International Relations.
       882. A letter from the Chairman, Farm Credit System 
     Insurance Corporation, transmitting a report of activities 
     under the Freedom of Information Act for calendar year 1994, 
     pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(e); to the Committee on Government 
     Reform and Oversight.
       883. A letter from the Deputy Associate Director for 
     Compliance, Department of the Interior, transmitting 
     notification of proposed refunds of excess royalty payments 
     in OCS areas, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1339(b); to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       884. A letter from the Chairman, Interstate Commerce 
     Commission, transmitting the Commission's 108th annual report 
     which summarizes its activities during fiscal year 1994, 
     pursuant to Public Law 96-448, section 217(c)(1) (94 Stat. 
     1925); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       885. A letter from the General Counsel of the Department's 
     of the Treasury and Housing and Urban Development, 
     transmitting a draft of proposed legislation entitled, 
     ``Federal Home Loan Bank System Restructuring and 
     Modernization Act of 1995''; jointly, to the Committees on 
     Banking and Financial Services and the Judiciary.
```
§ 1331.1 Form and content of application. The application and supporting exhibits shall conform to 49 CFR part 1104 and shall show, in the order and with the paragraph designations indicated, the following: ( a ) Full name and business address of the carrier applicant(s); whether each applicant is a corporation, individual, or partnership; if a corporation, the State of incorporation; and if a partnership, the names of the partners and date of the partnership's formation.
( b ) Full name and business address of each entity on whose behalf the application is filed and whether it is a corporation, individual, or partnership.
( c ) Whether applicant and each entity on whose behalf the application is filed is a rail, motor, or water carrier, a household goods freight forwarder, or express, sleeping-car, or pipeline company.
( d ) If the agreement of which approval is sought pertains to a conference, bureau, committee, or other organization, a complete description of such organization, including any subunits, and of its or their functions and methods of operation, together with a description of the territorial scope of such operations, and a complete description of any working or other arrangement or relationship that such organization has with any other organization. If the agreement is of any other character, a precise statement of its nature and scope and the mode of procedure thereunder.
( e ) The facts and circumstances relied upon to establish that the agreement will promote the national transportation policy at 49 U.S.C. 10101.
( f ) The name, title, and address of the person to whom correspondence is to be sent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0082 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSHUA JAMES HOWELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2022

09/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0082
§ 1503.627 Joint procedural or discovery schedule. ( a ) *General.* The parties may agree to submit a schedule for filing all prehearing motions, a schedule for conducting discovery in the proceedings, or a schedule that will govern all prehearing motions and discovery in the proceedings.
( b ) *Form and content of schedule.* If the parties agree to a joint procedural or discovery schedule, one of the parties must file the joint schedule with the ALJ, setting forth the dates to which the parties have agreed, and must serve a copy of the joint schedule on each party. ( 1 ) The joint schedule may include, but need not be limited to, requests for discovery, any objections to discovery requests, responses to discovery requests to which there are no objections, submission of prehearing motions, responses to prehearing motions, exchange of exhibits to be introduced at the hearing, and a list of witnesses that may be called at the hearing.
( 2 ) Each party must sign the original joint schedule to be filed with the Enforcement Docket Clerk.
( c ) *Time.* The parties may agree to submit all prehearing motions and responses and may agree to close discovery in the proceedings under the joint schedule within a reasonable time before the date of the hearing, but not later than 15 days before the hearing.
( d ) *Order establishing joint schedule.* The ALJ must approve the joint schedule filed by the parties. One party must submit a draft order establishing a joint schedule to the ALJ to be signed by the ALJ and filed with the Enforcement Docket Clerk.
( e ) *Disputes.* The ALJ must resolve disputes regarding discovery or disputes regarding compliance with the joint schedule as soon as possible so that the parties may continue to comply with the joint schedule.
( f ) *Sanctions for failure to comply with joint schedule.* If a party fails to comply with the ALJ's order establishing a joint schedule, the ALJ may direct that party to comply with a motion or discovery request or, limited to the extent of the party's failure to comply with a motion or discovery request, the ALJ may do the following: ( 1 ) Strike that portion of a party's pleadings.
( 2 ) Preclude prehearing or discovery motions by that party.
( 3 ) Preclude admission of that portion of a party's evidence at the hearing.
( 4 ) Preclude that portion of the testimony of that party's witnesses at the hearing.
98-1550.

#### State v. McGee.

Logan App. No. 8-98-01. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1461, 700 N.E.2d 878. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
 

WHITE PHOSPHORUS
 

Prepared by:
 

Sciences International, Inc.
 

Under Subcontract to:
 

Research Triangle Institute
 

Under Contract No. 205-93-0606
 

Prepared for:
 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
 

Public Health Service
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
 

September 1997 
WHITE PHOSPHORUS ii 

DISCLAIMER 

The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 
WHITE PHOSPHORUS iii 

UPDATE STATEMENT 

A Toxicological Profile for White Phosphorus was released in August 1989. This edition supersedes any 

previously released draft or final profile. 

Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. 

For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
 

Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch
 

1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29
 

Atlanta, Georgia 30333
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1885 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1885

 To limit the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to regulate 
               light and medium duty commercial vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1995

  Mr. Zeliff introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to regulate 
               light and medium duty commercial vehicles.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OVER LIGHT AND MEDIUM DUTY COMMERCIAL MOTOR 
              VEHICLES.

    (a) Definition for Safety Regulation.--Section 31132(1)(A) of title 
49, United States Code, is amended by striking ``10,001'' and inserting 
``26,001''.
    (b) Definition for Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators.--Section 
31301(4)(A) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
                    ``(A) has a gross vehicle weight rating of at least 
                26,001 pounds;''.
    (c) Definition for Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program.--
Section 31101 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``10,000'' and inserting ``26,000''.
    (d) Definition for Motor Vehicle Information System Program.--
Section 31106(a)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``10,001'' and inserting ``26,001''.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending April 30, 2011

----

Bank Holding Companies            M&T Bank Corporation, Buffalo, New York -- to acquire Wilmington Trust Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, and its subsidiary bank, Wilmington Trust Company, and subsidiary savings association, Wilmington Trust FSB, Baltimore, Maryland; and for M&T's subsidiary bank, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Wilmington Trust Company and Wilmington Trust FSB and to establish branches at the existing locations.            -Approved, April 26, 2011                        Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo, Japan -- determination that the structure of a proposed ownership interest would not result in the ability to exercise a controlling influence over Morgan Stanley, New York, New York.            -Concurred, April 22, 2011            (A/C)          Enforcement            Community Bankers Trust Corporation, Glen Allen, Virginia, and Essex Bank, Tappahannock -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the State Corporation Commission Bureau of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, April 26, 2011                        First Southern Bancorp, Statesboro, Georgia -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, April 26, 2011                        The Leaders Group, Inc., Oak Brook, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, April 28, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### J. Franklin Barnes, *Respondent, v.*The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Boardman, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending April 28, 2012

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST STATE BANK OF ST. ROBERT | Premises       | First State Bank of St. Robert, Waynesville, Missouri, to increase its investment in bank premises in the amount of $3.7 million. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable
|SUMMIT BANK                    | * Branch       | Summit Bank, Arkadelphia, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 545 Salem Road, Conway, Arkansas.             | Newspaper:05/03/2012Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:                     | 05/03/2012    
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|SUMMIT BK, ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS | 2505787 | 01/09/2012 | 04/23/2012     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. Brown Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer December 5, 2005
#### Timothy Dillon and another, *Respondents, v.*James L. Ingalsbe, *appellant.*

— Judgment affirmed, "with costs.

Potter, J., not acting.
PASSENGER VESSEL ACCESS BOARD MEETING

WASHINGTON, D.C.

JULY 10, 2013
REPRESENTING

Golden Gate Ferry

John Eberle, P.E., Deputy District Engineer

PRESENTER

Ted Bell, P.E. Moffatt & Nichol

PARTICIPATANTS by PHONE

John Eberle, P.E., GGBHTD

Bo Jensen, P.E., M&N

Azadeh Bozorgzadeh, P.E., M&N
Introduction

Golden Gate Ferry has three terminals being improved:

• Improvements will require telescoping gangplanks for passenger 

boarding

• Golden Gate Ferry carried 2.2 million passengers in 2012 and 

averages over 7,000 passengers on a weekday

Sausalito Terminal

Larkspur Terminal

San Francisco

Terminal 1
Telescoping Gangplank With No Handrail

2
Non-telescoping Gangplank – Fixed Handrails

3
Telescoping Gangplank With Partial Handrail

4
Summary

• GGF is undertaking a major rehabilitation project for their three 

terminals.

• GGF will be using telescoping gangplanks.

• Proposed Accessibility Guidelines do not address handrails on 

telescoping gangplanks.

• GGF requests the Board amend the guidelines to add clarity for 

the design of handrails on telescoping gangplanks.

5
Alternatives

Alternative 1A: Fixed Folding Handrail

Alternative 1B: Shorter Fixed Folding Handrail

Alternative 2: Discontinuous Overlapping Handrail

Alternative 3: Continuous Telescoping Handrail

6
Fixed Folding Handrail 

Alternative 1A & 1B

Handrail Extended Handrail Folded

7
Fixed Folding Handrail 

Alternative 1A

8
Side Elevation – Shorter Fixed Handrail

Alternative 1B

Infill Guardrails to prevent passage of 

arms & fingers (to prevent catching on 

sliding guard rail framing)

Rubrail to fender – 18”

Rubrail to fender – 0” Rubrail to fender – 36”

Extreme Condition

9
Discontinuous Overlapping Handrail 

Alternative 2

10
Continuous Telescoping Handrail 

Alternative 3

11
Detail of Continuous Telescoping Handrail & Floor 

Alternative 3

12
DISCUSSION

13
§ 1039.22 Exemption of certain payments, services, and commitments from the Elkins Act and related provisions. ( a ) Whenever a rail carrier: ( 1 ) Provides payments or services for industrial development activities; or,
( 2 ) Makes commitments regarding future transportation; and reasonably determines that such payments, services or commitments would not be eligible for inclusion in rail contracts under 49 U.S.C. 10709, such transaction(s) shall be exempt from 49 U.S.C. 13702(a), 13702(b)-(d), 11902, 11903, and 11904(a), subject to the conditions set forth in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
( b ) If any interested person(s) believes a transaction is eligible for inclusion in one or more contracts under 49 U.S.C. 10713, that person's exclusive remedy shall be to request the Board to so determine, and if the Board does so, the transaction shall no longer be exempted by this section commencing 60 days after the date of the Board's determination.
( c ) Transactions that are exempt under paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to all other applicable provisions of Title 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IV and to the antitrust laws to the extent that the activity does not fall within the Board's exclusive jurisdiction.
( d ) For any actual movement of traffic, a carrier must file any required tariff or section 10713 contract, and conform to all other applicable provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, but this paragraph shall not be interpreted to limit, revoke, or remove the effect of the exemption granted under paragraph (a) of this section with respect to any payments, services, or commitments made prior to the filing of the rate or contract.
( e ) When any person files with the Board a petition to revoke the exemption granted by this section as to any specific transaction, the rail carrier shall have the burden of showing that, with respect to such transaction, all requirements of paragraph (a) of this section were met, and the carrier reasonably expected, before undertaking such payments, services or commitments, that such payments, services or commitments would result, within a reasonable time, in a contribution to the carrier's going concern value.
( f ) This exemption shall remain in effect unless modified or revoked by a subsequent order of this Board.
[57 FR 11913, Apr. 8, 1992, as amended at 81 FR 8852, Feb. 23, 2016]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 12, 2013

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|1854 BANCORP         | * 18C* 3A1    | 1854 Bancorp, Cambridge, Massachusetts to become a mutual holding company through the acquisition of East Cambridge Savings Bank, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act.                                                                                       | Newspaper:01/12/2013Federal Register:01/22/2013   
|Newspaper:           | 01/12/2013   
|Federal Register:    | 01/22/2013   
|FRANKLIN BANCORP MHC | * 3A1         | Application by Franklin Bancorp MHC, Franklin, New Hampshire to establish a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of Franklin Savings Bank, Franklin, New Hampshire.  The filing was submitted pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/19/2013
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 01/19/2013   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us