alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.31 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1048]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.31  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. YATES, for today;
  To Miss. COLLINS of Michigan, for today and June 28th;
  To Mr. MFUME, for today;
  To Mr. GUNDERSON, for today; and
  To Mr. CAMP, for today.
  And then,
```
#### Henry Wynkoop, *Executor, etc., Plaintiff, v.*The Niagara Insurance Company, *Defendant*.

Motion for new trial denied and judgment for plaintiff on verdict, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM The
Company's Quarterly Report to Stockholders for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (195)
<INVENTORY>                                        192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,438
<PP&E>                                           7,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,346)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,485
<BONDS>                                            462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,056
<SALES>                                          3,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,729
<CGS>                                            2,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    673
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
Internet Archive's Wayback Machine

Loading...

http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/energymatters/pdfs/em_volume31.pdf | 14:56:27 Jul 13, 2009

Got an HTTP 302 response at crawl time

Redirecting to...

http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/energymatters/pdfs/em_volume31.pdf

Impatient?

The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.

Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive's Terms of Use.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0564 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2022

08/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0564
1

EXHIBIT  99.1


                        HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL CORPORATION
                                  CERTIFICATION
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


    In  connection  with  the  Harleysville National Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Walter Daller, Jr.,
Chairman,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

    1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the  dates  and  for  the  periods  expressed  in  the  Report.



                     /s/  Walter  E.  Daller,  Jr.
                     ------------------------------
                     Chairman,  President  and  Chief
                     Executive  Officer
                     Harleysville  National  Corporation

Date:  August  12,  2002
Exhibit 32

In connection with the Annual Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Randi Swatt, acting Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:   April 9, 2009

| |  |                                                                               
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ RANDI SWATT                                                               
| |  | Randi Swatt,
Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

G.L., the father,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-3485

[February 24, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Alberto Ribas, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017-0293 DP.

Albert W. Guffanti of Albert W. Guffanti, P. A., Miami, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of 

Children and Families.

Thomasina F. Moore and Samantha Costas Valley of the Florida 

Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad 

Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.5
 CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
 AMENDMENT NO. 7
TO
AMERICA WEST CO-BRANDED CARD AGREEMENT
 Amendment No. 7 Effective Date US Airways Group Juniper Bank
 RECITALS
 America West Original Agreement
 First Amendment Second Amendment Third Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment Agreement
    1. Definitions




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
 2. Amendment
 Conditions Precedent Section 14.3 Conditions Precedent
 (i)
    
    US Airways Groups Unrestricted
Cash shall be equal to or greater than $1.5 billion as measured
at the end of each month and ** pre-tax income
(excluding special items) measured ** (Income Test); provided,
however, for the months of January 2009 and February 2009, US
Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash shall be equal to or greater
than $1.4 billion and $1.45 billion, respectively **.For the purposes of this Section 14.3.1(i), the
calculation of Unrestricted Cash will include Collateral for
fuel hedge contracts **. By way of example, if October is
being measured for Novembers Subsequent Purchase, US Airways
Groups Unrestricted Cash (including the fuel hedge
contracts) will be measured as of October 31st **.If US Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash falls below $1.5
billion in any month (other than January 2009 and February
2009) but the Income Test is met, then Juniper Bank will be
required to purchase the additional Pre-Purchased Miles for
such month **.By way of example, if US Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash
falls below $1.5 billion in May but the Income Test is met,
then Juniper Bank will purchase the additional Pre-Purchased
Miles for such month. **.(ii)
    
    No Suspension Event has occurred
in the month being measured.(iii)
    
    No Early Payment Event has
occurred in the month being measured.(iv)
    
    No material change shall have
occurred to the ** card benefits as set forth in Exhibit
E, except as permitted pursuant to such Exhibit E.
   2




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
 (v)
    
    No merger of US Airways Group has
occurred pursuant to Section 4.9.(vi)
    
    US Airways Group shall have
complied with the reporting requirements set forth in
Section 17 for the month being measured.
 3. Effectiveness
 4. Effect
 5. Entire Agreement
 6. Counterparts
   3




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
  US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
    
    
    
    BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
Formerly known as
JUNIPER BANKBy:
    
    /s/ Derek J. Kerr

Derek J. Kerr
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Lloyd M. Wirshba

Lloyd M. WirshbaTitle: Executive Vice President
         and Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    Title: CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,886,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,886,276
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,856,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,735,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,856,281
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,971
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               630,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,528
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States Distric t 2 

### Judge for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 96-2134

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * James Edward Kral, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 10, 1996 Filed: January 7, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM. James Kral challenges the sufficienc y of the evidence to support his convic tionfor aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribut e methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994).
We have reviewed carefully the record and the parties' submission s and have concluded that the evidence was clearly sufficient to suppor t Kra l's conviction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Distric t Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

### -2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 1242.80 Fringe benefits (account 12-55-00).

Separate common expenses in proportion to the percentage separation calculated for the salaries and wages—administration account (account 11-55-01).
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.58  


 
 

TRI-S SECURITY CORPORATION
  MARKET STAND-OFF AGREEMENT    
    



        WHEREAS, the undersigned ("Investor") is an investor in Tri S Security Corporation (the "Company"), having purchased shares of the capital stock of the Company or
certain notes and warrants issued by the Company, which notes and or warrants are convertible into the capital stock of the Company. 


        WHEREAS,
the Company is in negotiations with Capital Growth Financial, LLC (the "Representative") as representative of various underwriters in connection with a proposed firm commitment
underwritten public offering of Units contain shares of the Company's common stock and Redeemable Stock Purchase Warrants (the "Firm Commitment Offering"). 



        WHEREAS,
as a condition precedent to undertaking the Firm Commitment Offering, the Representative has requested that Investor agree not to sell or otherwise transfer any of the
securities of the Company owned by Investor, or issuable upon conversion of the notes or warrants held by Investor, for a period of time. 


        NOW
THEREFORE, in order to induce the Underwriters to undertake the Firm Commitment Offering, if the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(No. 333-119737) registering the Company's securities (the "Registration Statement") is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Investor agrees not to offer,
sell, contract to sell, make short sales of, loan, grant any options for the purchase of, or otherwise dispose of any securities of the Company held by such Investor (the "Securities") without the
prior written consent of the Representative for one year from and after the effective date of the Registration Statement; provided,  however, that Investor
may sell, convey or transfer all or any portion of the Securities to the Corporation. Investor further agrees that the Company
may impose stop transfer instructions in order to enforce the foregoing covenants. 


        Acknowledged
and agreed. 



	 	 	"Investor"

(if an individual)
	

    	
 	


	

 	
 	

Print Name:	
 	


	

 	
 	

(if an entity)
	

    	
 	

 (print entity name)
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	


	

 	
 	

Name:	
 	


	

 	
 	

Title:	
 	















QuickLinks


TRI-S SECURITY CORPORATION MARKET STAND-OFF AGREEMENT
#### Lewis F. Fairchild, appellant, v. John H. Wilson, appellee.

Filed October 2, 1917.

No. 19615.

1. Appeal: Motion eor New Trial. If the motion for a new trial does not challenge the attention of the trial court to the inadequacy of the verdict, the point .will not he considered on appeal.

2. -: Instructions. “Instructions relating to the right to recover, and having no bearing on the *quantum*of damages, cannot be complained of by the plaintiff when the verdict was in his favor, and unsatisfactory only in its amount.” *Hankins v.*Majors, 56 Neb. 299.

*609Appeal from the district court for Keith county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Wilcoce & Ealligan,*for appellant.

*W. E. Shuman, contra.*

Morrissey, C. J.

This was an action for damages growing out of an assault with a deadly weapon. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a motion for a neiv trial, alleging numerous errors on the part of the trial court, hut not complaining of the amount of the recovery. The motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment entered-on the verdict, and plaintiff has appealed.

In the brief a number of the instructions are attacked, but no complaint is made of the instruction defining the measure of damages. It is not necessary to discuss seriatim the errors alleged. Every disputed question was, by the verdict, resolved in favor of plaintiff. The sole matter of which the plaintiff might complain was the amount awarded. This was not called to the attention of the trial court by the motion for a new trial, nor is it assigned, as required by the rules of the court, in the brief. It follows that the inadequacy of the verdict cannot be considered on appeal.

The objections to the instruction given fall within the rule announced in *Hankins v. Majors,*56 Neb. 299: “Instructions relating to the right to recover, and having no bearing on the *quantum*of damages, cannot be complained of by the plaintiff when the verdict was in his favor, and unsatisfactory only in its amount.”

The judgment is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1














Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm







Dynex
Capital, Inc.


Glen
Allen, Virginia




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 Nos. 333-22859, 333-10783, 333-10587, 333-35769 and 333-149475 and Form S-8
Nos. 333-32663, 333-1594426 and 333-159427 of Dynex Capital, Inc. of our reports
dated March 8, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the
effectiveness of Dynex Capital, Inc.’s internal control over financial
reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

















BDO
Seidman, LLP


Richmond,
Virginia





March 8,
2010
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 6, 1995 (74), Para 74.9 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 824]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.74.9  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

                        [Submitted June 1, 1995]

       Mr. SPENCE: Committee on National Security. H.R. 1141. A 
     bill to amend the Act popularly known as the Sikes Act to 
     enhance fish and wildlife conservation and natural resources 
     management programs; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-107, 
     Pt. 2). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
       Mr. BLILEY: Committee on Commerce. H.R. 1323. A bill to 
     reduce risk to public safety and the environment associated 
     with pipeline transportation of natural gas and hazardous 
     liquids, and for other purposes: with an amendment (Rept. No. 
     104-110 Pt. 2). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House 
     on the State of the Union.
       Mr. SPENCE: Committee on National Security. H.R. 1530. A 
     bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for 
     military activities of the Department of Defense, to 
     prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 1996, 
     and for other purposes; with amendments (Rept. No. 104-131). 
     Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 165

To make Members of Congress ineligible to participate in the Federal

Employees’ Retirement System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform and Oversight and, in addition, to the Committee

on House Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To make Members of Congress ineligible to participate in

the Federal Employees’ Retirement System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN FERS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in

5 this section, effective as of the date of the enactment of

6 this Act, a Member of Congress shall be ineligible to par7 ticipate in the Federal Employees’ Retirement System.

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with

9 respect to any individual who, as of the date of the enact-
2

•HR 165 IH

1 ment of this Act, satisfies the requirements of section

2 8410 of title 5, United States Code, for being considered

3 eligible for an annuity under subchapter II of chapter 84

4 of such title.

5 (c) REFUNDS OF CONTRIBUTIONS.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in subsection (a)

7 shall prevent appropriate refunds from being made,

8 in accordance with applicable provisions of law, on

9 account of an individual’s becoming ineligible to par10 ticipate in the Federal Employees’ Retirement Sys11 tem as a result of the enactment of this Act.

12 (2) SPECIAL RULE.—For purposes of making

13 any refunds in accordance with paragraph (1), a

14 Member who becomes ineligible to participate in the

15 Federal Employees’ Retirement System as a result

16 of the enactment of this Act shall be treated in the

17 same way as if separated from service.

18 (d) ANNUITANTS NOT AFFECTED.—Subsection (a)

19 shall not be considered to apply with respect to—

20 (1) any former Member of Congress who, as of

21 the date of the enactment of this Act, is entitled (or

22 would on proper application be entitled) to an annu23 ity computed, in whole or in part, by reference to

24 section 8415 of title 5, United States Code; or
3

•HR 165 IH

1 (2) any individual who, as of the date of the en2 actment of this Act, is entitled (or would on proper

3 application be entitled) to an annuity as a survivor

4 of a former Member of Congress.

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

6 For purposes of this Act, the terms ‘‘Member of Con7 gress’’ and ‘‘Member’’ have the same meaning as the term

8 ‘‘Member’’ under section 8401(20) of title 5, United

9 States Code.

Æ