```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 17, 1995 (68), Para 68.10 Providing for the Consideration of H. Con. Res. 67]
[Pages 750-751]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.68.10  providing for the consideration of h. con. res. 67

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 149):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) setting forth the 
     congressional budget for the United States Government for the 
     fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. 
     The first reading of the concurrent resolution shall be 
     dispensed with. All points of order against the concurrent 
     resolution and against its consideration are waived. General 
     debate shall be confined to the congressional budget and 
     shall not exceed six hours (including one hour on the subject 
     of economic goals and policies) equally divided and 
     controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
     Committee on the Budget. After general debate the concurrent 
     resolution shall be considered for amendment under the five-
     minute rule. The amendment printed in the report of the 
     Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
     considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of 
     the Whole. The concurrent resolution, as amended, shall be 
     considered as read. No further amendment shall be in order 
     except those designated in section 2 of this resolution. Each 
     amendment may be offered only in the order designated, may be 
     offered only by a Member designated, shall be considered as 
     read, shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 
     controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be 
     subject to amendment. All points of order against the 
     amendments designated in section 2 are waived except that the 
     adoption of an amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 
     constitute the conclusion of consideration of the concurrent 
     resolution for amendment. After the conclusion of 
     consideration of the concurrent resolution for amendment, and 
     a final period of general debate, which shall not exceed ten 
     minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
     ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget, the 
     Committee shall rise and report the concurrent resolution to 
     the House with such amendment as may have been adopted. The 
     previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
     concurrent resolution and amendments thereto to final 
     adoption without intervening motion except amendments offered 
     by the chairman of the Committee on the Budget pursuant to 
     section 305(a)(5) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to 
     achieve mathematical consistency. The concurrent resolution 
     shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question 
     of its adoption.
       Sec. 2. The following amendments are in order pursuant to 
     the first section of this resolution:
       (1) An amendment in the nature of a substitute by 
     Representative Gephardt of Missouri printed not later than 
     May 16, 1995, in

[[Page 751]]

     the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
     purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII, if proposing a 
     Congressional budget in which total outlays for the fiscal 
     year 2002 do not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year.
       (2) An amendment in the nature of a substitute by 
     Representative Neumann of Wisconsin or Representative Solomon 
     of New York consisting of the text of House Concurrent 
     Resolution 66.
       (3) An amendment in the nature of a substitute by 
     Representative Payne of New Jersey or Representative Owens of 
     New York printed by Representative Payne on May 16, 1995, in 
     the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
     purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII.
       (4) An amendment in the nature of a substitute by the 
     minority leader or a designee printed by him not later than 
     May 17, 1995, in the portion of the Congressional Record 
     designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII, if 
     proposing a Congressional budget based on a revised budget 
     submission by the President to the Congress in which total 
     outlays for the fiscal year 2002 do not exceed total receipts 
     for that fiscal year.
       Sec. 3. Rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the 
     adoption by the Congress of a conference report to accompany 
     a concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional 
     budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 
     1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  Mr. SOLOMON moved the previous question on the resolution to its 
adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. GOODLATTE, announced that the nays had 
it.
  Mr. SOLOMON objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

252

When there appeared

Nays

170
```