alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 109.17 Emergency Orders. ( a ) *Determination of imminent hazard.* When an Administrator determines that a violation of a provision of the Federal hazardous material transportation law, or a regulation or order prescribed under that law, or an unsafe condition or practice, constitutes or is causing an imminent hazard, as defined in § 109.1, the Administrator may issue or impose emergency restrictions, prohibitions, recalls, or out-of-service orders, without advance notice or an opportunity for a hearing. The basis for any action taken under this section shall be set forth in writing which must— ( 1 ) Describe the violation, condition, or practice that constitutes or is causing the imminent hazard;
( 2 ) Set forth the terms and conditions of the emergency order;
( 3 ) Be limited to the extent necessary to abate the imminent hazard; and,
( 4 ) Advise the recipient that, within 20 calendar days of the date the order is issued, recipient may request review; and that any request for a formal hearing in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 554 must set forth the material facts in dispute giving rise to the request for a hearing; and
( 5 ) Set forth the filing and service requirements contained in § 109.19(f), including the address of DOT Docket Operations and of all persons to be served with the petition for review.
( b ) *Out-of-service order.* An out-of-service order is issued to prohibit the movement of an aircraft, vessel, motor vehicle, train, railcar, locomotive, transport unit, transport vehicle, or other vehicle, or a freight container, portable tank, or other package until specified conditions of the out-of-service order have been met. ( 1 ) Upon receipt of an out-of-service order, the person in possession of, or responsible for, the package must remove the package from transportation until it is brought into compliance with the out-of-service order.
( 2 ) A package subject to an out-of-service order may be moved from the place where it was found to present an imminent hazard to the nearest location where the package can be brought into compliance, provided that the agent who issued the out-of-service order is notified before the move.
( 3 ) The recipient of the out-of-service order must notify the operating administration that issued the order when the package is brought into compliance.
( 4 ) Upon receipt of an out-of-service order, a recipient may appeal the decision of the agent issuing the order to PHMSA's Chief Safety Officer. A petition for review of an out-of-service order must meet the requirements of § 109.19.
( c ) *Recalls.* PHMSA's Associate Administrator, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, may issue an emergency order mandating the immediate recall of any packaging, packaging component, or container certified, represented, marked, or sold as qualified for use in the transportation of hazardous materials in commerce when the continued use of such item would constitute an imminent hazard. All petitions for review of such an emergency order will be governed by the procedures set forth at § 109.19.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
James H. Mackaness, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of IRIDEX Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010
(i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of IRIDEX Corporation.

Date: March 31, 2010



By:

/s/    JAMES H.
MACKANESSName:

James H. MackanessTitle:

Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERRANCE GARRIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 139 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### § 1184.3 Processing pooling applications.

After the pooling application is received (not less than 50 days before the effective date specified in the pooling agreement), the Board will either reject it or determine initially whether the pooling agreement is of major transportation importance and whether there is a substantial likelihood that the pooling agreement will unduly restrain competition. If neither of these two factors is present, the application will be granted without further hearing. Where either factor is found to exist, the application will be published in the Federal Register using the caption summary filed with the application, and a hearing will be scheduled (normally to receive written verified statements) to consider the issues further. In this second phase of the proceeding, the Board will consider whether the pooling agreement would be in the interest of better service to the public or of economy of operation and whether it will unduly restrain competition.
#### John C. Wilmerding and *others, Appellants, v.*John Cunningham, *Respondent.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.505 Scope and applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to U.S. documented or registered vessels that have a valid COI.
( b ) A vessel enrolled in the SIP will be inspected in accordance with its approved Vessel Action Plan (VAP).
( c ) The SIP includes all inspections required to renew and maintain a valid COI. The SIP does not include dry-dock examinations, unscheduled inspections related to vessel casualties, equipment repair or replacement, or vessel modifications. Those inspections will be conducted in accordance with the subparts applicable to the vessel.
§ 1104.5 Affirmation or declarations under penalty of perjury in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1621 in lieu of oath. ( a ) An affirmation will be accepted in lieu of an oath.
( b ) Whenever any rule of this Board requires or permits matter to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit, in writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a special official other than a notary public), such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, evidenced, established, or proven by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, in writing of such person which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury and dated, in the following form: I ______________, declare (certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury (“under the laws of the United States,” if executed outside of the United States) that the foregoing is true and correct. Further, I certify that I am qualified and authorized to file this (specify type of document). Executed on (*date*). Signature
( c ) Knowing and willful misstatements or omissions of material facts constitute federal criminal violations punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Additionally, these misstatements are punishable as perjury under 18 U.S.C. 1621.
[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996; 81 FR 8853, Feb. 23, 2016]
#### § 30.10-7 Certificated—TB/ALL.

The term *certificated* when applied to tank vessels refers to a vessel covered by a certificate of inspection issued by the Coast Guard; when applied to men employed on tank vessels, the term refers to a certificate of ability issued by the Coast Guard.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-49363, 333-47760, 333-54060, 333-54062,333-53982, 333-65694, 333-66650, and 333-109043 of GSI Commerce, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 9, 2004, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GSI Commerce, Inc. for the year ended January 3, 2004. 

 

 

Philadelphia,Pennsylvania 

March 16, 2004
§ 1503.647 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Request for subpoena.* A party may obtain a subpoena to compel the attendance of a witness at a deposition or hearing, or to require the production of documents or tangible items, from the ALJ who is assigned to the case, or, if no ALJ is assigned or the assigned law judge is unavailable, from the chief ALJ. The party must complete the subpoena, stating the title of the action and the date and time for the witness' attendance or production of documents or items. The party who obtained the subpoena must serve the subpoena on the witness or the custodian of the documents or tangible items sought to be produced.
( b ) *Motion to quash or modify the subpoena.* A party, or any person upon whom a subpoena has been served, may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance. The applicant must describe, in detail, the basis for the application to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the testimony, document, or tangible evidence is not relevant to the proceeding, that the subpoena is not reasonably tailored to the scope of the proceeding, or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect of the subpoena pending a decision by the ALJ on the motion.
( c ) *Enforcement of subpoena.* Upon a showing that a person has failed or refused to comply with a subpoena, a party may apply to the U.S. district court having jurisdiction to seek judicial enforcement of the subpoena in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 46104.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 121 (Monday, June 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of American Teletronics, Inc., n/k/a: Shine 
Holdings, Inc., Order of Suspension of Trading

June 21, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
American Teletronics, Inc., n/k/a Shine Holdings, Inc., because it has 
not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 
1996.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in American Teletronics, 
Inc., n/k/a Shine Holdings, Inc., is suspended for the period from 9:30 
a.m. EDT on June 21, 2007, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on July 5, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-3113 Filed 6-11-07; 11:30 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.11 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 633]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.11  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. DIAZ-BALART: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 139. 
     Resolution providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 
     1361) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for 
     the Coast Guard, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-111). 
     Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. SHUSTER: Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
       H.R. 961. A bill to amend the Federal Water Pollution 
     Control Act; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-112). Referred 
     to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
     Union.
```
98-2605.

#### State v. Graham.

Sandusky App. No. S-97-050. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment entered October 26, 1998,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 110

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### §§ 110.70-110.90 [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 9, 2011

|Filer                        | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. | * 4c8       | Section 4(c)(8) application by First Southern Bancorp., Inc., Stanford, KY to acquire up to 24.99% of the outstanding voting shares of CKF Bancorp, Inc., Danville, KY. | Newspaper:07/21/2011Federal Register:07/22/2011
|Newspaper:                   | 07/21/2011 
|Federal Register:            | 07/22/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, April 4, 1995 (55), Para 55.21 Change of Reference--H.J Res. 70]
[Page 533]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.55.21  change of reference--h.j res. 70

  On motion of Mrs. CHENOWETH, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
House Oversight was discharged from further consideration of the bill 
(H.J. Res. 70) authorizing the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to establish a 
memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr. in the District of Columbia or its 
environs.
  When said bill was rereferred to the Committee on Resources.
```
§ 1011.2 The Board. ( a ) The Board reserves to itself for consideration and disposition: ( 1 ) All rulemaking and similar proceedings involving the promulgation of rules or the issuance of statements of general policy.
( 2 ) All investigations and other proceedings instituted by the Board, except as may be ordered in individual situations.
( 3 ) All administrative appeals in a matter previously considered by the Board.
( 4 ) All other matters submitted for decision except those assigned to an individual Board Member or employee or an employee board.
( 5 ) Except for matters assigned to the Chairman of the Board under § 1011.4(a)(6): ( i ) The determination of whether to reconsider a decision being challenged in court;
( ii ) The disposition of matters that have been the subject of an adverse decision by a court; and
( iii ) The determination of whether to file any memorandum or brief or otherwise participate on behalf of the Board in any court.
( 6 ) The disposition of all matters involving issues of general transportation importance, and the determination whether issues of general transportation importance are involved in any matter.
( 7 ) All appeals of initial decisions issued by the Director of the Office of Proceedings under the authority delegated by § 1011.7(a), and all appeals of initial decisions issued by the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance under the authority delegated by § 1011.7(b). Appeals must be filed within 10 days after service of the Director decision or publication of the notice, and replies must be filed within 10 days after the due date for appeals or any extension thereof.
( b ) The Board may bring before it any matter assigned to an individual Board Member or employee or employee board.
[67 FR 60167, Sept. 25, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 8850, Feb. 23, 2016]
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 February 2012 — Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission**

**(Case C‐421/11 P)**

Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Competition — Cartel — Market for methacrylates — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Presumption of decisive influence — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Extension of the authority of a final decision — Deterrent multiplying factor — Indivisible nature of the fine — Unlimited jurisdiction

1.                     *Appeals — Grounds — Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the
Court of Justice, Art. 58; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 17, 31, 69-71)*

2.                     *Competition — Union rules — Infringements — Attribution — Parent company and subsidiaries — Economic unit — Criteria for assessment —
Presumption that a parent company wields decisive influence over its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Art. 101 TFEU; Council Regulation
No 1/2003, Art. 23(2)) (see paras 25, 28, 30, 33, 38, 46-50, 62)*

3.                     *Appeals — Grounds — Inadequate statement of reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Whether permissible —
Conditions (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.) (see paras 41-42)*

4.                     *Appeals — Jurisdiction of the Court — Challenge on grounds of fairness to the General Court’s assessment concerning the amount
of a fine imposed on an undertaking — Excluded (Art. 101 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58; Council Regulation
No 1/2003, Art. 23) (see para. 87)*

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 June 2011 in Case T‐206/06 | Total and Elf Aquitaine | v | Commission | , in which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates) — Competition — Cartel — Infringement of the principle that the institutions must act within the limits of their powers and of the principle of proportionality — Manifestly erroneous interpretation — Infringement of the rights of the defence and of the principles of equity and of equality of arms — Duty to state reasons — Infringement of the principle of sound administration. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA are ordered to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1833 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                      December 7, 1995.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1833) entitled ``An Act to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban 
partial-birth abortions'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Page 2, line 9, strike out [Whoever] and insert: Any physician who

(2)Page 2, line 12, after ``both.'' insert: This paragraph shall not 
apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of 
a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or 
injury: Provided, That no other medical procedure would suffice for 
that purpose. This paragraph shall become effective one day after 
enactment.

(3)Page 2, line 13, strike out [As] and insert: (1) As

(4)Page 2, after line 16, insert:
    ``(2) As used in this section, the term `physician' means a doctor 
of medicine or osteopathy legally authorized to practice medicine and 
surgery by the State in which the doctor performs such activity, or any 
other individual legally authorized by the State to perform abortions: 
Provided, however, That any individual who is not a physician or not 
otherwise legally authorized by the State to perform abortions, but who 
nevertheless directly performs a partial-birth abortion, shall be 
subject to the provisions of this section.

(5)Page 2, line 17, strike out [(c)(1) The father,] and insert: (c)(1) 
The father, if married to the mother at the time she receives a 
partial-birth abortion procedure,

(6)Page 3, strike out lines 12 through 20

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1833

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.25-75 Ventilation. ( a ) All enclosed spaces containing cargo tanks fitted with bottom outlet connections shall be provided with mechanical ventilation of sufficient capacity to assure a change of air every 3 minutes. Where cargo tanks are fitted with top outlet connections, the enclosed spaces containing such tanks shall be fitted with efficient natural or mechanical ventilation.
( b ) Enclosed compartments in which machinery such as cargo pumps or vapor compressors are located shall be adequately ventilated.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 13, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 76.50-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart, with the exception of §§ 76.50-80 and 76.50-90, as applicable, apply to all vessels contracted for on or after November 19, 1952.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to January 18, 2017 and on or after November 19, 1952, must meet the requirements of § 76.50-80.
( c ) Vessels contracted for prior to November 19, 1952, must meet the requirements of § 76.50-90.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48259, July 22, 2016]