Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 2015 / Notices 45655 

The EPA’s adequacy review is separate 

from the EPA’s attainment plan 

completeness review and it is not 

dispositive of the EPA’s ultimate action 

on the attainment plan. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–767Iq. 

Dated: July 15, 2015. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2015–18832 Filed 7–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0322: FRL–9931–62– 

Region 10] 

Adequacy Determination for the Grants 

Pass, Oregon Carbon Monoxide State 

Implementation Plan for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy 

determination. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is notifying the public of 

its finding that the Grants Pass, Oregon 

second 10-year limited maintenance 

plan (LMP) for carbon monoxide (CO) is 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. The LMP was submitted to 

the EPA by the State of Oregon 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(ODEQ or the State) on April 22, 2015. 

As a result of our adequacy finding, 

regional emissions analyses will no 

longer be required as part of the 

transportation conformity 

demonstrations for CO for the Grants 

Pass area. 

DATES: This finding is effective August 

17, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

finding will be available at the EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. You may also 

contact Dr. Karl Pepple, U.S. EPA, 

Region 10 (OAWT–107), 1200 Sixth 

Ave., Suite 900, Seattle WA 98101; (206) 

553–1778; or by email at pepple.karl@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action provides notice of the EPA’s 

adequacy finding regarding the second 

10-year CO limited maintenance plan 

(LMP) for the Grants Pass area for 

purposes of transportation conformity. 

The EPA’s finding was made pursuant 

to the adequacy review process for 

implementation plan submissions 

delineated at 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1) under 

which the EPA reviews the adequacy of 

a state implementation plan (SIP) 

submission prior to the EPA’s final 

action on the implementation plan. 

The State submitted the LMP to the 

EPA on April 22, 2015. Pursuant to 40 

CFR 93.118(f)(1), the EPA notified the 

public of its receipt of this plan and its 

review for an adequacy determination 

on the EPA’s Web site and requested 

public comment by no later than June 3, 

2015. The EPA received no comments 

on the plan during the comment period. 

As part of our analysis, we also 

reviewed the State’s compilation of 

public comments and response to 

comments that were submitted during 

the State’s public process for the LMP. 

There were no adverse comments 

directed at the on-road portion of the 

LMP. 

Based on our review, the EPA believes 

it is appropriate to find this LMP 

adequate for use in transportation 

conformity prior to final action on the 

LMP. The EPA has moved forward with 

an approval notice for the Grants Pass 

CO LMP. Until that action is final and 

effective, this adequacy finding allows 

the State to apply the LMP for 

transportation conformity purposes. 

The EPA notified ODEQ in a letter 

dated June 24, 2015 (adequacy letter), 

subsequent to the close of the EPA 

comment period, that the EPA had 

found the LMP to be adequate for use in 

transportation conformity. A copy of the 

adequacy letter and its enclosure are 

available in the docket for this action 

and at the EPA’s conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/

stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.109(e), limited 

maintenance plans are not required to 

contain on-road motor vehicle 

emissions budgets. Accordingly, as a 

result of this adequacy finding, regional 

emissions analyses will no longer be 

required as a part of the transportation 

conformity demonstrations for CO for 

the Grants Pass area. However, other 

conformity requirements still remain 

such as consultation (40 CFR 93.112), 

transportation control measures (40 CFR 

93.113), and project level analysis (40 

CFR 93.116). 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

Transportation conformity to a SIP 

means that on-road transportation 

activities will not produce new air 

quality violations, worsen existing 

violations, or delay timely attainment of 

the national ambient air quality 

standards. The minimum criteria by 

which we determine whether a SIP is 

adequate for conformity purposes are 

specified at 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). The 

EPA’s analysis of how the LMP satisfies 

these criteria is found in the adequacy 

letter and its enclosure. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–767Iq. 

Dated: July 15, 2015. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2015–18830 Filed 7–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0085; FRL– 

9931–71–OEI] 

Proposed Information Collection 

Request; Comment Request; NESHAP 

for Radionuclides (Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency is planning to submit an 

information collection request (ICR), 

‘‘NESHAP for Radionuclides (Renewal)’’ 

(EPA ICR No. 1100.15, OMB Control No. 

2060–0249) to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 

approval in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is 

soliciting public comments on specific 

aspects of the proposed information 

collection as described below. This is a 

proposed extension of the ICR. An 

Agency may not conduct or sponsor and 

a person is not required to respond to 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before September 29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing the above referenced Docket 

ID Number online using 

www.regulations.gov (our preferred 

method), or by mail to: EPA Docket 

Center, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Philip Egidi, Radiation Protection 

Division, Office of Radiation and Indoor 

Air, Mail Code 6608J, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
45656 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 2015 / Notices 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; 

telephone number: (202) 343–9186; fax 

number: (202) 343–2304; email address: 

egidi.philip@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov 

or in person at the EPA Docket Center, 

WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The telephone number for the 

Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For 

additional information about EPA’s 

public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/ 

dockets. 

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments 

and information to enable it to: (i) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (ii) evaluate the 

accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (iv) minimize the burden 

of the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including through 

the use of appropriate automated 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. EPA will consider the 

comments received and amend the ICR 

as appropriate. The final ICR package 

will then be submitted to OMB for 

review and approval. At that time, EPA 

will issue another Federal Register 

notice to announce the submission of 

the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to 

submit additional comments to OMB. 

Abstract: In the context of the Clean 

Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857), Section 114 

authorizes the Administrator of EPA to 

require any person who owns or 

operates any emission source or who is 

subject to any requirements of the Act 

to: (1) Establish and maintain records, 

(2) make reports, install, use, and 

maintain monitoring equipment or 

method, (3) sample emissions in 

accordance with EPA prescribed 

locations, intervals and methods, and 

(4) provide information as may be 

requested. EPA’s regional offices use the 

information collected to ensure that 

public health continues to be protected 

from the hazards of radionuclides by 

compliance with health based 

standards. This information is required 

for those facilities meeting the 

definition of each Subpart. EPA’s 

compliance monitoring activities vary 

widely. EPA could issue a letter 

requesting information about 

compliance or could conduct a fullscale investigation, including on site 

inspections. The information required to 

be submitted is not confidential in 

nature. 

Respondents/affected entities: The 

NAICS Codes of facilities associated 

with the activity of the respondents are: 

(1) Elemental Phosphorous 325188, (2) 

Phosphogypsum Stacks 212392, (3) 

Underground Uranium Mines 212291, 

and (4) Uranium Mill Tailings 212291 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory. 

Estimated number of respondents: 20 

(total). 

Frequency of response: Initially 

(Once), Annually, Random 

(Occasionally). 

Total estimated burden: 2,872 hours 

(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.03(b). 

Total estimated cost: $500,572, which 

includes $283,460 in annualized capital 

and O&M costs. 

Changes in Estimates: The final ICR 

submitted to OMB will contain revised 

burden estimates that reflect any 

changes to the collection over the past 

three years and any public comments 

received. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Acting Director, Collections Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–18717 Filed 7–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9931–59–Region 9] 

Public Water System Supervision 

Program Revision for the State of 

Hawaii 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of tentative approval. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the State of Hawaii revised its approved 

Public Water System Supervision 

Program (PWSSP) under the federal Safe 

Drinking Water Act (SDWA) pertaining 

to administrative penalty authority. The 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

has determined that these revisions by 

the State are no less stringent than the 

corresponding Federal regulations and 

otherwise meet applicable SDWA 

primacy requirements. Therefore, EPA 

intends to approve these revisions to 

Hawaii’s PWSSP. 

DATES: Written comments and/or 

request for a public hearing must be 

received on or before August 31, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to 

this determination are available for 

inspection between the hours of 8:30 

a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, at the following offices: Hawaii 

Department of Health, Safe Drinking 

Water Branch, Environmental 

Management Division, 919 Ala Moana 

Blvd., Room 308, Honolulu, Hawaii 

96814; and United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 9, Drinking 

Water Management Section, 75 

Hawthorne Street (WTR–3–1), San 

Francisco, California 94105. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anna Yen, EPA Region 9, Drinking 

Water Management Section, at the 

address given above; telephone number: 

(415)972–3976; email address: 

yen.anna@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. EPA approved the State’s 

original application for PWSSP primary 

enforcement authority which, following 

the public notice period, became 

effective on October 20, 1977 (42 FR 

47244, no request for public hearing 

received). EPA subsequently approved 

and finalized revisions to Hawaii’s 

PWSSP on the following dates: May 6, 

1993 (58 FR 17892); July 19, 1993 (58 

FR 33442); September 29, 1993 (58 FR 

45491); March 13, 1995 (60 FR 7962); 

and May 23, 1996 (61 FR 17892). 

Public Process. Any interested party 

may submit written comments on this 

determination and/or request a public 

hearing. All comments will be 

considered and, if necessary, EPA will 

issue a response. A request for a public 

hearing and/or comments must be 

submitted by August 31, 2015, to the 

Regional Administrator at the EPA 

Region 9 address shown above. The 

Regional Administrator may deny 

frivolous or insubstantial requests for a 

hearing. If a substantial request for a 

public hearing is made by August 31, 

2015, EPA Region 9 will hold a public 

hearing. Any request for a public 

hearing shall include the following 

information: 1. The name, address, and 

telephone number of the individual, 

organization, or other entity requesting 

a hearing; 2. A brief statement of the 

requesting person’s interest in the 

Regional Administrator’s determination 

and a brief statement of the information 

that the requesting person intends to 

submit at such hearing; and 3. The 

signature of the individual making the 

request, or, if the request is made on 

behalf of an organization or other entity, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES