alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012126EN.01000901.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 February 2012 — Wim J. J. Slot v 3 H Camping-Center Heinsberg GmbH

(Case C-98/12)

2012/C 126/17

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Wim J. J. Slot

Appellant:

Respondent: 3 H Camping-Center Heinsberg GmbH

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is there a matter relating to a consumer contract within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 (1) if a trader has, by the design of his website, directed his activities to another Member State and a consumer domiciled in the territory of that Member State, on the basis of the information on the trader’s website, travels to where his business is located and the parties sign the contract there,
  or
  does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 presuppose in that case that a distance contract is concluded? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is there a matter relating to a consumer contract within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 (1) if a trader has, by the design of his website, directed his activities to another Member State and a consumer domiciled in the territory of that Member State, on the basis of the information on the trader’s website, travels to where his business is located and the parties sign the contract there,

1

or

does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 presuppose in that case that a distance contract is concluded?

| 2. | If Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 is to be interpreted as meaning that in that case the contract must in principle be a distance contract:
  Does the consumer jurisdiction under Article 15(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 16(2) of Regulation No 44/2001 apply if the parties to the contract enter into a distance pre-contractual commitment which subsequently flows directly into the conclusion of the contract? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 is to be interpreted as meaning that in that case the contract must in principle be a distance contract:

Does the consumer jurisdiction under Article 15(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 16(2) of Regulation No 44/2001 apply if the parties to the contract enter into a distance pre-contractual commitment which subsequently flows directly into the conclusion of the contract?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.

1

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1885

To limit the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to regulate light

and medium duty commercial vehicles.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 16, 1995

Mr. ZELIFF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To limit the authority of the Secretary of Transportation

to regulate light and medium duty commercial vehicles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OVER LIGHT AND MEDIUM DUTY

4 COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES.

5 (a) DEFINITION FOR SAFETY REGULATION.—Section

6 31132(1)(A) of title 49, United States Code, is amended

7 by striking ‘‘10,001’’ and inserting ‘‘26,001’’.

8 (b) DEFINITION FOR COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE

9 OPERATORS.—Section 31301(4)(A) of title 49, United

10 States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 1885 IH

1 ‘‘(A) has a gross vehicle weight rating of

2 at least 26,001 pounds;’’.

3 (c) DEFINITION FOR MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY AS4 SISTANCE PROGRAM.—Section 31101 of title 49, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘10,000’’ and insert6 ing ‘‘26,000’’.

7 (d) DEFINITION FOR MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION

8 SYSTEM PROGRAM.—Section 31106(a)(1) of title 49,

9 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘10,001’’ and

10 inserting ‘‘26,001’’.

Æ
§ 90.10-29 Passenger. ( a ) The term *passenger* means— ( 1 ) On an international voyage, every person other than— ( i ) The master and the members of the crew or other persons employed or engaged in any capacity on board a vessel on the business of that vessel; and
( ii ) A child under 1 year of age.
( 2 ) On other than an international voyage, an individual carried on the vessel, except— ( i ) The owner or an individual representative of the owner or, in the case of a vessel under charter, an individual charterer or individual representative of the charterer;
( ii ) The master; or
( iii ) A member of the crew engaged in the business of the vessel who has not contributed consideration for carriage and who is paid for onboard services.
( b ) The term *passenger for hire* means a passenger for whom consideration is contributed as a condition of carriage on the vessel, whether directly or indirectly flowing to the owner, charterer, operator, agent, or any other person having an interest in the vessel.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25288, May 20, 1996]
§ 68.33 Privileges of a limited coastwise endorsement. ( a ) A vessel which is documented and issued a limited coastwise endorsement under this subpart may operate on the navigable waters of the United States or in the EEZ in coastwise trade only for the following purposes: ( 1 ) To recover oil discharged into the water.
( 2 ) To transport oil discharged into the water.
( 3 ) To transport and deploy equipment, supplies, and personnel for recovering and transporting oil discharged into the water.
( 4 ) To conduct training exercises to prepare for performing the functions in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section.
( b ) This limited coastwise endorsement also entitles the vessel to any other employment for which a registry or fishery license is not required.
( c ) A vessel which is documented and issued a limited coastwise endorsement under this subpart may qualify to operate for other purposes by meeting the applicable requirements of part 67 of this chapter.
[CGD 90-055, 57 FR 7642, Mar. 3, 1992. Redesignated by USCG-2005-20258, 71 FR 61418, Oct. 18, 2006; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49230, Sept. 25, 2009]
§ 1546.407 Training, testing, and knowledge of individuals who perform screening functions. ( a ) *Training required.* Before performing screening functions, an individual must have completed initial, recurrent, and appropriate specialized training as specified in this section and the foreign air carrier's security program. No foreign air carrier may use any screener, screener in charge, or checkpoint security supervisor unless that individual has satisfactorily completed the required training. This paragraph does not prohibit the performance of screening functions during on-the-job training as provided in § 1544.409(b).
( b ) *Use of training programs.* Training for screeners must be conducted under programs provided by TSA. Training programs for screeners-in-charge and checkpoint security supervisors must be conducted in accordance with the foreign air carrier's security program.
( c ) *Classroom instruction.* Each screener must complete at least 40 hours of classroom instruction or successfully complete a program that TSA determines will train individuals to a level of proficiency equivalent to the level that would be achieved by such classroom instruction.
( d ) *Screener readiness test.* Before beginning on-the-job training, a screener trainee must pass the screener readiness test prescribed by TSA.
( e ) *On-the-job training and testing.* Each screener must complete at least 60 hours of on-the-job training and must pass an on-the-job training test prescribed by TSA. No foreign air carrier may permit a screener trainee to exercise independent judgment as a screener, until the individual passes an on-the-job training test prescribed by TSA.
( f ) *Knowledge requirements.* Each foreign air carrier must ensure that individuals performing as screeners, screeners-in-charge, and checkpoint security supervisors for the foreign air carrier have knowledge of the provisions of this part, the foreign air carrier's security program, and applicable emergency amendments to the foreign air carrier's security program to the extent necessary to perform their duties.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation:


We have examined management's assertion about Chase Manhattan Mortgage
Corporation's (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
("standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for
the year ended December 31, 1999 included in the accompanying management
assertion (see Exhibit I). The Company performs loan subservicing functions for
the residential loan servicing portfolio of Chase Mortgage Company. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 8, 2000


<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                                                       Exhibit 1

                  Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                      with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 8, 2000


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, Chase Manhattan Mortgage
Corporation ("CMMC") and Chase Mortgage Company ("CMC") and their subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Group") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards (the "Standards") set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Group had in effect fidelity bond and errors
and omissions policy in the amounts of $250,000,000 and $25,000,000
respectively.

/s/ Thomas Jacob                           /s/ Lucy Gambino
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Thomas Jacob                               Lucy Gambino
Chief Executive Officer                    Vice President of Risk Management


/s/ Glenn Mouridy
-------------------------------------
Glenn Mouridy
Executive Vice President and CFO
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 24, 2011

|Filer                            | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CLOVER LEAF FINANCIAL CORP | * 3A1         | First Clover Leaf Financial Corp., Edwardsville, Illinois, to become a bank holding company through the conversion of First Clover Leaf Bank, Edwardsville, Illinois, from a federally chartered savings bank to a state chartered commercial bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/21/2011
|Newspaper:                       | Not available
|Federal Register:                | 10/21/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                 | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF FAYETTE CTY, MOSCOW, TENNESSEE | 466754 | 01/10/2011 | 05/02/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|BANKTENNESSEE, COLLIERVILLE, TENNESSEE | 831576 | 03/28/2011 | 09/19/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT
DODSON & HOOKS, APLC 

### VERSUS THE LOUISIANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL FUND, INC. ( CAPFUND)

CONSOLIDATED WITH THE LOUISIANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL FUND, INC. ( CAPFUND) VERSUS DODSON & HOOKS, APLC NO. 

### 2021 CW 1400

FEBRUARY 17, 2022
In Re; Dodson & Hooks, APLC, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton 

### Rouge, No. 

### 642, 674 c/ w 652, 673. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, 

### C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. VGW AHP CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT 

# Z r— 

# f 

# ml

# I; W) 

# k DEPUTY C ERK OF COURT 

### FOR THE COURT
#### § 90.10-5 Carrying freight for hire.

The carriage of any goods, wares, or merchandise or any other freight for a valuable consideration whether directly or indirectly flowing to the owner, charterer, operator, agent, or any other person interested in the vessel.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11135

Summary Calendar

LARRY GENE POWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEMPLE INLAND MORTGAGE CORPORATION;

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT; CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE

COMPANY; THE CITY OF TERRELL,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-2351-D)

February 19, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DUHÉ and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Gene Powell appeals the denial of a motion for a TRO and/or
1Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1987).

2Matter of Lieb, 915 F.2d 180 (5th Cir. 1990).

2

preliminary injunction. We must determine, sua sponte if necessary, whether we

have appellate jurisdiction.1 We find that we do not for the denial of a TRO is not

appealable.2 Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
§ 1105.5 Determinative criteria. ( a ) In determining whether a “major Federal action” (as that term is defined by the Council on Environmental Quality in 40 CFR 1508.18) has the potential to affect significantly the quality of the human environment, the Board is guided by the definition of “significantly” at 40 CFR 1508.27.
( b ) A finding that a service or transaction is not within the STB's jurisdiction does not require an environmental analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act or historic review under the National Historic Preservation Act.
( c ) The environmental laws are not triggered where the STB's action is nothing more than a ministerial act, as in: ( 1 ) The processing of abandonments proposed under the Northeast Rail Services Act (45 U.S.C. 744(b)(3));
( 2 ) Statutorily-authorized interim trail use arrangements under 16 U.S.C. 1247(d) [*see,* 49 CFR 1152.29]; or
( 3 ) Financial assistance arrangements under 49 U.S.C. 10904 (*see* 49 CFR 1152.27).
Finally, no environmental analysis is necessary for abandonments that are authorized by a bankruptcy court, or transfers of rail lines under plans of reorganization, where our function is merely advisory under 11 U.S.C. 1166, 1170, and 1172. [56 FR 36105, July 31, 1991; 56 FR 49821, Oct. 1, 1991; 81 FR 8853, Feb. 23, 2016]
**Exhibit      32.2**

**HARLEYSVILLE      NATIONAL CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 22, 1995 (85), Para 85.28 Submission of Conference Report--H.R. 483]
[Page 1038]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.85.28  submission of conference report--h.r. 483

  Mr. BILIRAKIS submitted a conference report (Rept. No. 104-157) on the 
bill (H.R. 483) to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 
permit medicare select policies to be offered in all States, and for 
other purposes; together with a statement thereon, for printing in the 
Record under the rule.
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?

COM\_2018\_0600\_FIN.ENG.xhtml.1\_EN\_ACT\_part1\_v5.docx


![european flag](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/image/eclogo.jpg)EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 21.6.2018

COM(2018) 600 final

DRAFT General Budget
of the European Union
for the financial year 2019

- General Introduction
- General statement of revenue
- Statement of revenue and expenditure by section

DOCUMENTS

| |
| --- |
| |

DRAFT General Budget

of the European Union

for the financial year 2019

—
   General introduction

—
   General statement of revenue

—
   Statement of revenue and expenditure by section:

   —
   Section 1: European Parliament

—
   Section 2: European Council and Council

 
   —
   Section 3: European Commission

—
   Section 4: Court of Justice of the European Union

 
   —
   Section 5: Court of Auditors

—
   Section 6: European Economic and Social Committee

 
   —
   Section 7: Committee of the Regions

—
   Section 8: European Ombudsman

 
   —
   Section 9: European Data Protection Supervisor

 
   —
   Section 10: European External Action Service

<http://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm>

| |
| --- |
| |
EXHIBIT  99.1
-------------


                        HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL CORPORATION
                                  CERTIFICATION
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


        In connection with the Harleysville National Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Walter Daller,
Jr.,  Chairman,  President  and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  added  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

         1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

         2.     To  my  knowledge the information contained in the Report fairly
presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of
operations  of  the  Company  as  of  and  for the period covered by the Report.



                                /s/  Walter  E.  Daller,  Jr.
                                ------------------------------
                                Chairman,  President  and  Chief
                                Executive  Officer
                                Harleysville  National  Corporation

 Date:   November  12,  2002
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 7, 1995 (75), Para 75.6 Subpoena]
[Page 826]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.75.6  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                         Seventh District, NJ,

                                                     May 24, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my office has 
     received a subpoena issued by the Municipal Court of 
     Manville, New Jersey.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I have 
     determined that compliance with the subpoena is consistent 
     with the privileges and precedents of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                                       Bob Franks,
                                               Member of Congress.
```
§ 1580.101 Applicability. This subpart applies to each of the following owner/operators: ( a ) Described in § 1580.1(a)(1) of this part that is a Class I freight railroad.
( b ) Described in § 1580.1(a)(1) of this part that transports one or more of the categories and quantities of RSSM in an HTUA.
( c ) Described in § 1580.1(a)(4) of this part that serves as a host railroad to a freight railroad described in paragraph (a) of (b) of this section or a passenger operation described in § 1582.101 of this subchapter.