alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 90.10-20 Liftboat.

*Liftboat* means an offshore supply vessel with moveable legs capable of raising its hull above the surface of the sea.

[CGD 82-004a, 55 FR 2525, Jan. 25, 1990, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58282, Sept. 29, 2014]
#### Charles E. Patterson, *Receiver, etc., Respondent, v.*Daniel Robinson, Appellant.—

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.,

and by Bocees, J., dissenting.
§ 67.171 Deletion; requirement and procedure. ( a ) A Certificate of Documentation together with any endorsement(s) thereon is invalid, except as provided in § 67.161, and the vessel is subject to deletion from the roll of actively documented vessels when: ( 1 ) The vessel is placed under foreign flag;
( 2 ) The vessel is sold or transferred in whole or in part to a person who is not a citizen of the United States within the meaning of subpart C of this part;
( 3 ) Any owner of the vessel ceases to be a citizen of the United States within the meaning of subpart C of this part;
( 4 ) The owner no longer elects to document the vessel;
( 5 ) The vessel no longer measures at least five net tons;
( 6 ) The vessel ceases to be capable of transportation by water;
( 7 ) The owner fails to exchange the Certificate as required by § 67.167;
( 8 ) The owner fails to maintain the markings required by subpart I of this part;
( 9 ) The endorsements on the Certificate are revoked because the vessel owner is the subject of an outstanding civil penalty assessed by the Coast Guard; or
( 10 ) The owner fails to: ( i ) Renew the endorsement(s) as required by § 67.163; or
( ii ) Comply with the provisions of § 67.165.
( b ) Where a cause for deletion arises for any reason under paragraphs (a) (1) through (6) of this section, the owner must send or deliver the original Certificate of Documentation to the National Vessel Documentation Center together with a statement setting forth the reason(s) deletion is required.
( c ) When a Certificate of Documentation is required to be deleted because the vessel has been placed under foreign flag or has been sold or transferred in whole or in part to a non-citizen of the United States, the owner of that vessel must comply with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, and file: ( 1 ) Evidence of the sale or transfer, if any; and
( 2 ) Evidence that the Maritime Administration has consented to the sale or transfer, except for vessels identified in § 67.11(b) and vessels for which the Maritime Administration has granted approval for unrestricted sale or transfer pursuant to regulations set forth in 46 CFR part 221.
( d ) A certificate evidencing deletion from U.S. documentation will be issued upon request of the vessel owner to the National Vessel Documentation Center upon compliance with the applicable requirements of this subpart.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by CGD 94-008, 59 FR 49847, Sept. 30, 1994; CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31605, June 15, 1995]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.4 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 416]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.4  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER announced he had examined and approved the Journal of the 
proceedings of Thursday, March 16, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
#### § 1110.4 Participation.

Any person may participate in rulemaking proceedings by submitting written information or views. In addition, the Board may invite persons to present oral arguments, participate in informal conferences, appear at informal fact-finding hearings, or participate in any other proceedings. Information contained in written submissions will be given the same consideration.
Order entered March 27, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00091
- CV BYRON CURTIS COOK, Appellant

V. RONALD SIMMONS, Appellee On Appeal from the 417th Judici al District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417
- 02850
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s March 25, 2019 motion f o r exten sion of time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 25, 2019. B ecause this is an accelerated appeal, we caution appellee that further extension requests will be
disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.30 Committees and Subcommittees to Sit]
[Page 1048]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.30  committees and subcommittees to sit

  On motion of Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, by unanimous consent, the following 
committees and their subcommittees were granted permission to sit during 
the 5-minute rule on Wednesday, June 28, 1995: the Committee on 
Agriculture, the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, the 
Committee on Commerce, the Committee on Economic and Educational 
Opportunities, the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, the 
Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on National Security, the 
Committee on Small Business, the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence.
```
§ 67.99 Evidence of build. ( a ) Evidence of the facts of build may be either a completed original form CG-1261, or other original document containing the same information, executed by a person having personal knowledge of the facts of build because that person: ( 1 ) Constructed the vessel;
( 2 ) Supervised the actual construction of the vessel; or
( 3 ) Is an officer or employee of the company which built the vessel and has examined the records of the company concerning the facts of build of the vessel.
( b ) A vessel owner applying for documentation must file a separate certificate from each builder involved in the construction of the vessel.
( c ) A Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin is not evidence of the facts of build.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARRELL KEITH EVANS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-837, CA-97-2072-10-3)

Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph Marshall Lee, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Darrell Keith Evans seeks to appeal the district

court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Evans, Nos. CR95-837; CA-97-2072-10-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 550.203 Failure to provide information. ( a ) A person who fails to file a report, answer, documentary material, or other information required under this subpart shall be liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each day that the information is not provided.
( b ) The Commission may, when there is a failure to produce any information ordered produced under § 550.201, make appropriate findings of fact and inferences, including the inference that conditions unfavorable to shipping in the foreign trade of the United States do exist.
[58 FR 64910, Dec. 10, 1993. Redesignated at 64 FR 8008, Feb. 18, 1999, and amended at 67 FR 39861, June 11, 2002]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Ms. Donna B. Hill 

Southern Company 

600 18Lh Street North 

Mail Bin 14N-8195 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Dear Ms. Hill: 

JUl 3 1 2013 

OFFICE OF WATER 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received your request for plant-specific 

information, including estimated compliance costs and pollutant removals, related to the 

proposed revisions to the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric 

Power Generating Point Source Category (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819). In 

response to your request, please find enclosed a disc containing one file and six attachments for 

each plant for which costs/removals are being provided. The file and attachments present the 

input values and the costs and pollutant removals for the requested plants, as well as additional 

information regarding EPA's estimation of these values. The EPA is providing costs and 

pollutant removals for the following plants: 

• Barry (0765 1 ); 

• Gadsden (04495); 

• EC Gaston (00928); 

• Gorgas (04599); 

• Greene County (06368); 

• James H. Miller Jr (01493); 

• Bowen (02244); 

• Harlee Branch (05762); 

• Hammond (06634); 

• Edwin I Hatch (083 79); 

• Kraft (02966); 

• Jack McDonough (03793); 

• Mcintosh (07629): 

• McManus (04617): 

• Mitchell (00635); 

• Scherer (08179); 

Internet Address (URL) • http /lwww epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
• Vogtle (07527); 

• Wansley (05043); 

• Yates (06370); 

• Crist (04 702); 

• Scholz (01366); 

• Lansing Smith (05620); 

• Victor J. Daniel Jr (02482); 

• Jack Watson (00654); 

• Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center (06453); and 

• Rowan (08451). 

The information provided in the enclosed disc may contain information that was claimed by your 

company's plants as confidential business information (CBI) in response to the Questionnaire for 

the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. The EPA is not responsible for the 

release of this CBI if you or others in your company provide these attachments to other parties. If 

you have any questions regarding these estimates, please contact me at (202) 566-1755 or 

alicea.jezebele@epa.gov. 

Thank you for your interest in the steam electric effluent guidelines rulemaking process. 

Enclosures
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending January 15, 2011

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIVE POINTS BANK       | * 18C          | Five Points Bank, Grand Island, Nebraska, to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the LaVista, Nebraska branch of First State Bank, Gothenberg, Nebraska.                                | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | Not available 
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable
|NORCON FINANCIAL CORP. | CIC            | Notice submitted by Jeffrey J. Heiman and Jerod J. Heiman, both of Wichita, Kansas, to retain control of Norcon Financial Corp., parent of Conway Bank, National Association, both in Conway Springs, Kansas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/03/2011    
|Newspaper:             | Not available 
|Federal Register:      | 01/03/2011    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                     | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF HARTINGTON, HARTINGTON, NEBRASKA   | 7456   | 10/25/2010 | 01/07/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|CITIZENS ST BK OF CORTEZ, CORTEZ, COLORADO | 782650 | 10/04/2010 | 01/05/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|EXCHANGE BK OF MO, FAYETTE, MISSOURI       | 686459 | 10/04/2010 | 01/04/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.515 Eligibility. ( a ) The company must— ( 1 ) Have owned or operated at least one U.S. documented or registered vessel for a minimum of 3 consecutive years before the SIP application date; and
( 2 ) Have paid all civil penalties and user fees.
( b ) Except as allowed by paragraph (c) of this section, each vessel must— ( 1 ) Have been in operation with an eligible owner or operator for at least 3 consecutive years before the SIP application date;
( 2 ) Have had no revocation of its COI during the 3 years before the SIP application date; and
( 3 ) Have no documented deficiency for any of the following in the 3 years before the SIP application date: ( i ) Any vessel operation inconsistent with the operating details specified on its COI.
( ii ) Operating without the required amount of lifesaving appliances on board the vessel or with inoperable survival craft.
( iii ) Operating without the required firefighting equipment on board the vessel or with an inoperable fire pump(s).
( iv ) Unauthorized modifications to the vessel's approved systems or structure, such as fixed firefighting systems, pollution prevention arrangements, overcurrent protection devices, or watertight boundary arrangements.
( v ) Operating without the required navigation equipment on board the vessel or with inoperable navigation equipment.
( c ) A vessel constructed for, or acquired by, a company with one or more vessels enrolled in the SIP need not meet the requirement in paragraph (b)(1) of this section for enrollment in the SIP, provided that the vessel holds a valid COI issued by the OCMI where the vessel will principally operate.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 8, 2010

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|NEW CENTURY BANK   | * Branch       | New Century Bank, doing business as Customer 1st Bank, Phoenixville, PA, to establish three branch offices, located at 2419 Nottingham Way, Hamilton, NJ, Route 413 & Doublewoods Road, Langhorne, PA, and 73 Old Dublin Pike, Doylestown, PA. | Newspaper:05/20/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 05/20/2010    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable
|TOWER BANCORP INC. | * 3A5          | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA.                                                                                                                                            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/09/2010 
|Newspaper:         | Not available 
|Federal Register:  | 04/09/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# UNITEDAIRLINE S \ ^ STA R ALLIANC E Marti n Kommeima n Pnone : (312)997-867 7 ManoQe rFAX : (312 ; 907-867 7 MorVe t Anciysi s E-mail : Martin . Kammefmon^unlted.con i September? . 201 0 Aloh aLe y " ' —r , Associate Directo r

..: ; '_'-\^-— J
'.— 1 Smal l Communit

y Air Servic e Developmen t

Programn - Unite d State s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n ^ - ^ - ' Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysis , X86-31 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenu e S E - Washington , D C 2059 0 /'• ' RE ; Lansin g Capital Regio n International Airpor t Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Proposa l fo r a Minimu mRevenu e Guarante e i n th e Lansing-Washin g Dulle s Market Dea r M s Ley : Unite dAirline s support s Capita l Regio n International Airport' s proposa l under th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra mfo r aminimu mrevenu e guarante e i n th e Lansing-Washingto n Dulle s market . Th e dat a include di n th e proposal o f

Capital Regio n International Airpor t indicate s loca

l an d connectin g traffi c deman d fo r nonsto p regional je t

servic e connectin g Lansin g t o th e Washington/Baltimor e area . Whil e ther e anumerou s opportunitie s t o introduc e new servic e acros s ou r network , al l opportunitie s presen t financia l risk t o th e company . Opportunitie s i n communitie s offerin g t o reduc e ris k wit h aminimu mrevenu e guarante e andaproven recordo f th e communit

y activel y marketin g ne

w service , improv e di e rankin g o f th e opportunit y amon g al l opportunitie s i n United' s network . A Smal l Communit y Air Servic e Development

Grant base do n th e Airport' s proposal woul d reduc e th e inheren t financia l ris k t o United . Whil e Unite d canno t

commi t t o servin g th e Lansing-Washingto n market wit h nonsto p servic e i

f th e communit

y i s awarde dfundin g under

th e Smal l Communit

y Air Servic e Developmen t

Program , a

n awar d coul d reduc e th e financia l risk o f servin g th e market

an d woul d b e include d i

n ou r decision-makin g process . Sincerely ,

Martin Kammerma

n Manager . Market

Analysi s Unite dAir

Lines , Inc .

Aodress : Th e Untte a BuHding , 7 7 wes t wocke rDf^e . Cf.lcago . IL6060 1
RE: language Insert for Section III 

Laity, James A. 

to: 

Lydia Wegman 

06/01/2010 07:51 PM 

Cc: 

"Mancini, Dominic J.", Scott Mathias, Richard Wayland, Kevin McLean, Tricia Crabtree 

Show Details 

Lydia:  We will need a little time to go over everything in the morning and discuss internally.  We have a staff

meeting at 11 AM.  Can we say noon for a call?  ‐‐ jim

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 7:50 PM 

To: Laity, James A. 

Cc: Mancini, Dominic J.; Mathias.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; Wayland.Richard@epamail.epa.gov; 

Mclean.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Re: language Insert for Section III

 

Great--thanks Jim. We'll fix that typo. I'm about to send you a couple of other things. 

-----"Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: 06/01/2010 07:46PM 

cc: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov> 

Subject: language Insert for Section III

Lydia, This language looks good to us. (Note that the last sentence has a typo, should say, “...as it develops its

implementation guidance.”)   ‐‐ jim

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 6:04 PM 

To: Laity, James A.; Mancini, Dominic J. 

Cc: Mathias.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; Wayland.Richard@epamail.epa.gov; Hemby.James@epamail.epa.gov; 

schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov; Mclean.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov; thrift.mike@epamail.epa.gov; 

Wallace.Larry@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject:

 

Jim and Dom, 

Below is an edited version of the paragraph Jim sent us on the use of monitoring and modeling. Based on our 

discussion, we believe it addresses your concerns. If you agree with this language, we would plan to place it at the 

end of the Section III. Let us know what you think. 

For the reasons discussed above, EPA has determined that it is appropriate and efficient to principally use 

modeling to assess compliance for medium to larger sources, and to rely more on monitoring for groups of 

smaller sources and sources not as conducive to modeling. EPA’s revised monitoring network 

requirements have been developed to be consistent with this approach. However, EPA is still considering 

how monitoring and modeling data would be used together in specific situations to define attainment and 

nonattainment boundaries and under what circumstances it may be appropriate to rely on monitoring data 

alone to make attainment determinations. EPA intends to address these issues as it develops in 

implementation guidance. 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\tcrabtre\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4286.htm 6/2/2010
 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\tcrabtre\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4286.htm 6/2/2010
#### § 1135.1 Quarterly adjustment.

To enable the Board to publish the rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) as required by 49 U.S.C. 10708, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) shall calculate and file with the Board by the fifth day of December, March, June and September of each year its forecast for the next calendar quarter of the all-inclusive index of railroad costs and calculate and file the RCAF unadjusted for changes in railroad productivity as prescribed in *Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures,* 1 I.C.C.2d 207 (1984), and any subsequent amendments thereto. In addition, the AAR shall calculate the productivity-adjusted RCAF as prescribed in *Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures,* 5 I.C.C.2d 434 (1989), and any subsequent amendments thereto. The AAR shall submit workpapers detailing its calculations. The Board will review and verify the AAR submissions and make its RCAF publication by the twentieth day of December, March, June and September of each year.

[67 FR 55166, Aug. 28, 2002]