alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                           PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (Unaudited)
                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                       --------------------------------------------------------------
                                        2004        2003        2002          2001         2000 (a)
                                       -------     -------     -------     ----------   -------------
<S>                                    <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes                    $27,452     $ 9,041     $ 4,677     $      990   $        (528)
Fixed charges                           21,219      15,792       5,782          2,742           1,817
                                       -------     -------     -------     ----------   -------------
                                       $48,671     $24,833     $10,459     $    3,732   $       1,289
                                       =======     =======     =======     ==========   =============
Fixed charges:
Interest expense                       $18,964     $14,781     $ 5,564     $    2,660   $       1,723
Interest portion of rental expense       2,255       1,011         218             82              94
                                       -------     -------     -------     ----------   -------------
                                       $21,219     $15,792     $ 5,782     $    2,742   $       1,817
                                       =======     =======     =======     ==========   =============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        2.29        1.57        1.81           1.36               -
                                       =======     =======     =======     ==========   =============
</TABLE>

(a) Our earnings were insufficient to cover our fixed charges by $528 for the
year ended December 31, 2000.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6601

FRANCIS NWANKWO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, LSCI-Butner, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-831) Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl J. Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, R. A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Francis Nwankwo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Nwankwo v. Warden, No. CA-00-831 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2001); see United States v. White , 238 F.3d 537, 542-43(4th Cir.) (holding that when there are multiple counts of conviction, statutory maximum sentence on each count may be aggregated to reach the appropriate sentence within the applicable guidelines range), cert. denied , U.S. , 121 S. Ct. 2235 (2001); In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 329-30 (4th Cir. 2000) (explaining applicability of savings clause in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      1,971,000
<SECURITIES>                                3,241,100         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 110,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,322,700 
<PP&E>                                     24,050,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              9,781,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             19,592,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         640,500
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 18,910,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              545,200
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 273,200 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                80,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            80,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   80,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .54
        

</TABLE>
98-758.

#### Cleveland Hts./Univ. Hts. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 95-D-1124, 95-D-1125, 95-D-1126, 95-D-1127, 95-D-1128, 95-D-1129 and 95-D-1130. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the motion of appellees, Melvin S. Ross and Daryl B. Ross, to participate in oral argument scheduled for January 13,1999,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
98-1807.

#### In re Guardianship of Lombardo.

Summit App. No. 18605. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II only.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would allow all propositions of law.

Douglas, Resnick and Cook, JJ., dissent.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending November 19, 2011

----

Forms            Forms -- final Board review to implement the Capital Assessments and Stress Testing (FR Y-14A and Y-14Q).            -Approved, November 16, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Regulation Y (Bank Holding Companies and Change in Bank Control) -- final rule to require large bank holding companies to submit capital plans to the Federal Reserve annually and to obtain approval, in certain circumstances, before making capital distributions.            -Approved, November 17, 2011                        Supervisory and Enforcement Responsibilities for Federal Consumer Financial Laws -- interagency statement on how the total assets of an insured bank, thrift, or credit union will be measured for purposes of determining supervisory and enforcement responsibilities under the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Announced, November 17, 2011            Enforcement            Security Bank, Tulsa, Oklahoma -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition and assessment of civil money penalty against Bryan T. Posey, a former president and director of the bank.            -Announced, November 16, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending March 12, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 11

                    INDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY
                  Computation of Per Share Earnings
              (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                             THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                   JUNE 30,             JUNE 30,
                                1999       1998       1999      1998
                             ------------------     ----------------
INCOME:
  Net income................$  2,712   $  2,947   $  5,155  $  5,438
                             =======    =======    =======   =======
SHARES:
  Weighted average common
   shares outstanding.......   7,308      7,435      7,335     7,433
                             =======    =======    =======   =======
BASIC INCOME PER SHARE:
 Net income per share.......$    .37   $    .40   $    .70  $    .73
                             =======    =======    =======   =======
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (A)
 USE OF PROCEEDS:
  Assumed exercise of
   options..................$  2,427   $  2,690   $  3,341  $  2,533
  Tax benefit from assumed
   exercise of options......     664      1,105        743       962
  Repurchase of treasury
   stock at the average
   market price per share of
   $11.93, $15.24, $12.45,
   and $14.14, respectively.  (3,091)    (3,795)    (4,084)   (3,495)
                             -------    -------    -------   -------
Assumed balance to be
   reinvested...............$      -   $      -   $      -  $      -
                             =======    =======    =======   =======
SHARES:
 Weighted average shares
  outstanding...............   7,308      7,435      7,335     7,433
 Shares assumed issued
  for options...............     367        390        444       379
 Treasury stock assumed
  purchased.................    (259)      (249)      (328)     (247)
                             -------    -------    -------   -------
 Adjusted average shares
 outstanding................   7,416      7,576      7,451     7,565
                             =======    =======    =======   =======
DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE:
 Net income per share.......$    .37   $    .39   $    .69  $    .72
                             =======    =======    =======   =======

(A)  Warrants were not assumed to be exercised as the effect would
     have been anti-dilutive.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending February 7, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



Exhibit
10.2  Notice of Grant of Stock Options
and Option Agreement
    
    LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
ID: 94-2712976
1621 BARBER LANE
MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035
   OPTIONEE NAME & ADDRESS
    
    OPTION NUMBER:
Plan:
   Effective
                    , you have been granted a nonstatutory stock option to buy
           shares of LSI LOGIC CORPORATION common stock at an exercise price of
$           per share. The total option price of the shares granted is $          . The number of shares indicated are scheduled to become fully vested on the date
shown below. However, vesting will occur only if you have not incurred a
Termination of Service prior to such date. The latest this option will expire is
the Expiration Date shown below; however, if you incur a Termination of Service,
this option may expire sooner, as described in the attached LSI LOGIC
CORPORATION Stock Option Agreement (the Agreement). Capitalized terms that are
not defined in this Notice of Grant or the Agreement have the same meaning as in
the LSI LOGIC CORPORATION referenced stock option plan. Shares
    
    Vest Type
    
    Full Vest
    
    Expiration
   By your signature below, you agree that these options are granted under and
governed by the terms and conditions of the Agreement (and the stock option plan
referenced therein), which is attached and made a part of this document. You
acknowledge that you have received, read and understand this Notice of Grant,
the Agreement and the LSI LOGIC CORPORATION referenced stock option plan, and
that you have had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to
signing below. You agree to accept as binding, conclusive and final all
decisions or interpretations of the Administrator regarding any questions
relating to the LSI LOGIC CORPORATION referenced stock option plan, this Notice
of Grant and the Agreement.   OPTIONEE
NAME
    
Date
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 99.2(vi)



[CHASE LOGO]
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                      CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2001-S6


Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated October 1,
2001 between Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation, Servicer and Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation hereby provides the following Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof,




/s/ Lucy P. Gambino                         /s/ Susan Christman
---------------------------                 -----------------------------------
Lucy P. Gambino                             Susan Christman
Vice President                              Assistant Treasurer



Certified March 6, 2002


31D
#### The Commercial Bank, *Respondent, v.*Josephine Trau and others, *Appellants*.

J udgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 10, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 78.36-15 Shipboard stowage. ( a ) The approved buoyant work vests shall be stowed separately from the regular stowage of approved life preservers.
( b ) The locations for the stowage of work vests shall be such as not to be easily confused with that for approved life preservers.
#### Same *v.*Same.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
§ 69.113 Superstructure tonnage. ( a ) *Defined.* “Superstructure tonnage” means the tonnage of all superstructure spaces.
( b ) *Method of calculating tonnage.* The tonnage of all structures on each level on or above the uppermost complete deck (or shelter deck, if applicable) is calculated separately as follows: ( 1 ) Measure the length of each structure along its centerline at mid-height to the line of the normal frames. (See § 69.123, figure 11.)
( 2 ) Divide the length under paragraph (b)(1) of this section into an even number of equal parts most nearly equal to those into which the tonnage length is divided under § 69.109.
( 3 ) Measure at mid-height the inside breadth to the line of the normal frames at each end and at each point of division of the length. Number the breadths successively “1”, “2”, and so forth, beginning at the extreme forward end of the structure. If an end of the structure is in the form of a continuous arc or curve, the breadth at that end is one-half the nearest breadth. If an end is in the form of an arc or curve having a decided flat, the breadth at the end is two-thirds of the nearest breadth.
( 4 ) Multiply the even numbered breadths by four and the odd numbered by two, except the first and last breadth, which are multiplied by one.
( 5 ) Add together the products under paragraph (b)(4) of this section and multiply the sum by one-third of the interval between the points at which the breadths are taken. The product is the square foot area of the structure at mid-height.
( 6 ) Multiply this area by the average of the heights taken at each point of division of the structure between its decks or the line of its decks. The product divided by 100 is the tonnage of that structure.
( c ) A structure having steps in its deck or side must be measured in parts.
( d ) The superstructure tonnage is the sum of tonnages of each level above the line of the uppermost complete deck (or shelter deck, if applicable).
( e ) When a structure is located over a cut-away portion of the tonnage deck, the structure's height is measured from the under side of its overhead deck to the line of the tonnage deck. If the tonnage deck has no camber, allow for camber in the overhead deck.
( f ) For structures of a standard geometric shape, a simple geometric formula that yields an accurate volume may be used. All measurements are terminated at the line of the normal frames.
[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58281, Sept. 29, 2014; USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18726, Mar. 31, 2016]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Prather, California. The purpose of the meeting is to receive and review recommend project proposals for FY2007 funds regarding the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-                              ( print page 40113)                            Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) for expenditure of Payments to States Fresno County Title II funds.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 11, 2007 from 6:30 p.m. to 9 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the High Sierra Ranger district, 29688 Auberry Road, Prather, California 93651. Send written comments to Robbin Ekman, Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, c/o Sierra National Forest, High Sierra Ranger District, 29688 Auberry Road, Prather, CA 93651 or electronically to                         *rekman@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robbin Ekman, Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559) 855-5355 ext. 3341.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring Payments to States Fresno County title II project matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by August 24, 2007 will have the opportunity to address the Committee at those sessions. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Call for new projects and (2) Public comment.

Dated: July 11, 2007.

Ray Porter,

District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 07-3529  Filed 7-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M