UNITED STATES


                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005



[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11766

                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
      (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


         California                                              95-3788040
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                       Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                   (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (i) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the  registrant  was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X   No ___


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.     Financial Statements


                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2005

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                           <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                  $ 79
   Receivables and deposits                                                      395
   Restricted escrows                                                            625
   Other assets                                                                  629
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 3,998
      Buildings and related personal property                   34,593
                                                                38,591
      Less accumulated depreciation                            (29,178)        9,413
                                                                            $ 11,141

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 327
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           258
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                    130
   Other liabilities                                                             240
   Mortgage note payable                                                      31,993

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                             $ (535)
   Limited partners (39,627 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (21,272)      (21,807)
                                                                            $ 11,141

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                 2005          2004
Revenues:
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>
   Rental income                                                $1,938        $1,906
   Other income                                                    228           242
      Total revenues                                             2,166         2,148
Expenses:
   Operating                                                       783           667
   General and administrative                                       97           114
   Depreciation                                                    374           345
   Interest                                                        549           564
   Property taxes                                                  308           276
      Total expenses                                             2,111         1,966

Net income                                                       $ 55         $ 182

Net income allocated to general partners (1%)                     $ 1          $ 2
Net income allocated to limited partners (99%)                      54           180

                                                                 $ 55         $ 182

Net income per limited partnership unit                         $ 1.36        $ 4.54

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



                             ANGELES PARTNERS XI
            CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                       Limited
                                     Partnership     General       Limited
                                        Units        Partners     Partners       Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions         40,000          $ 30       $ 40,000     $ 40,030

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2004                   39,627         $ (536)     $(21,326)     $(21,862)

Net income for the three months
   ended March 31, 2005                    --              1            54            55

Partners' deficit at
   March 31, 2005                      39,627         $ (535)     $(21,272)     $(21,807)


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                                        March 31,
                                                                   2005           2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                                <C>           <C>
  Net income                                                       $ 55          $ 182
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                    374            345
     Amortization of loan costs                                        4              4
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                         4             53
      Other assets                                                   (95)          (173)
      Accounts payable                                               245            (87)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (15)           (24)
      Other liabilities                                             (165)          (160)
      Due to affiliates                                               29             29
        Net cash provided by operating activities                    436            169

Cash flows used in investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (471)          (117)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (255)          (239)
  Advances from affiliates                                            78             --
        Net cash used in financing activities                       (177)          (239)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (212)          (187)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                     291            386

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                         $ 79          $ 199

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 544          $ 560
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:
  Property improvements and replacements included in
      accounts payable                                             $ 49           $ --

Included in property  improvements  and  replacements for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 are approximately  $36,000 of improvements which were included in
accounts payable at December 31, 2004.

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners
XI (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
In  the  opinion  of  Angeles  Realty  Corporation  II  (the  "Managing  General
Partner"),  all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the
three month period ended March 31, 2005, are not  necessarily  indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2005.  For
further  information,   refer  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004.  The  Managing  General  Partner is an
affiliate of Apartment  Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and
its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of  all  Partnership
activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain  payments to
affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the
Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The Partnership  paid to such affiliates  approximately  $113,000 and
$108,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which
is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates  of  the  Managing   General  Partner  charged  the  Partnership  for
reimbursement of accountable  administrative expenses amounting to approximately
$86,000  and  $48,000  for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2005 and 2004,
respectively,  which are  included in general and  administrative  expenses  and
investment property. Approximately $30,000 of these expenses were payable to the
Managing  General  Partner  at  March  31,  2005  and  are  included  in  due to
affiliates.  The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property
for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2005 and 2004  are  fees  related  to
construction  management  services  provided  by an  affiliate  of the  Managing
General  Partner  of  approximately  $52,000  and  $7,000,   respectively.   The
construction  management  service fees are  calculated  based on a percentage of
current additions to investment property.

The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for a fee equal to 7.5% of "net cash flow
from  operations",  as defined in the Partnership  Agreement,  to be paid to the
Managing General Partner for executive and administrative  management  services.
One half of this fee is to be accrued and not paid  unless the limited  partners
have  received  distributions  equal to a 5%  cumulative  annual return on their
adjusted capital investment as defined in the Partnership Agreement. This return
criteria has not been met. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
no fees were earned or paid.  At March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  has accrued
approximately $21,000 of Partnership  management fees,  representing one half of
the fees earned in 2000,  2001 and 2002 which are included in due to affiliates.
This amount will remain accrued until the criteria for payment has been met.

During the three  months  ended March 31, 2005,  the  Managing  General  Partner
advanced the Partnership  approximately  $78,000 to cover capital  enhancements.
Interest  was  charged  at prime  plus 2%  (7.75%  at March  31,  2005)  and was
approximately  $1,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.  The advance is
outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and is included in due to affiliates along with
the  associated  accrued  interest.  There were no  advances  from the  Managing
General  Partner or associated  interest  expense  during the three months ended
March 31, 2004.

Subsequent  to March  31,  2005,  the  Managing  General  Partner  advanced  the
Partnership approximately $445,000 for operations at the Partnership's property.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing  General  Partner.  During the three months  ended March 31, 2005,  the
Partnership  was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately  $72,000 for
hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.
Additional  charges  will be  incurred by the  Partnership  during 2005 as other
insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO
and its  affiliates  approximately  $97,000  for  insurance  coverage  and  fees
associated with policy claims  administration during the year ended December 31,
2004.

Note C - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On May 4, 2004,
the Objector filed a second appeal  challenging the court's use of a referee and
its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  The Managing General Partner and its affiliates
are  currently  scheduled  to file an answer to  Objector's  petition on May 18,
2005.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

As previously disclosed,  AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging
that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to
pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all hours worked in excess of forty per
week.  The  complaint  attempts to bring a collective  action under the FLSA and
seeks to certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland,  and the District of
Columbia.  Specifically,  the plaintiffs  contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and
NHP Management  Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that
they were required to be "on-call."  Additionally,  the complaint  alleges AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating  maintenance  workers for time that they worked in  responding to a
call  while  "on-call."  The  defendants  have  filed an answer  to the  amended
complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.  Oral argument  relating to the
certification of the collective  action is scheduled for May 12, 2005.  Although
the outcome of any  litigation is  uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on its
financial  condition or results of operations.  Similarly,  the Managing General
Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material adverse
effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated  financial  condition  or  results of
operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature
arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various  Federal,  state and local laws subject  property owners or operators to
liability for management,  and the costs of removal or  remediation,  of certain
hazardous  substances  present on a property.  Such laws often impose  liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the  hazardous  substances.  The  presence of, or the
failure to manage or remedy properly,  hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected  apartment  communities and the ability to sell or finance
affected properties.  In addition to the costs associated with investigation and
remediation  actions brought by government  agencies,  the presence of hazardous
substances  on a  property  could  result in claims by  private  plaintiffs  for
personal injury,  disease,  disability or other  infirmities.  Various laws also
impose  liability for the cost of removal,  remediation or disposal of hazardous
substances  through a  licensed  disposal  or  treatment  facility.  Anyone  who
arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous  substances  is  potentially
liable  under such laws.  These laws often impose  liability  whether or not the
person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal  facility.
In connection with the ownership and operation of its property,  the Partnership
could  potentially be liable for  environmental  liabilities or costs associated
with its property.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits  against owners and managers of multifamily
properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the
presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial  monetary judgments
or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property
damage loss claims  arising from the  presence of mold and for  personal  injury
claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have
implemented a national  policy and  procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from
its properties  and the Managing  General  Partner  believes that these measures
will  eliminate,  or at least  minimize,  the  effects  that mold  could have on
residents.  To date,  the  Partnership  has not incurred  any material  costs or
liabilities  relating to claims of mold  exposure  or to abate mold  conditions.
Because the law  regarding  mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing
General  Partner  can make no  assurance  that  liabilities  resulting  from the
presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material  adverse  effect on the
Partnership's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

SEC Investigation

The  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") is conducting a formal investigation  relating to certain
matters.  Although  the staff of the SEC is not limited in the areas that it may
investigate,   AIMCO  believes  the  areas  of  investigation   include  AIMCO's
miscalculated   monthly  net  rental  income  figures  in  third  quarter  2003,
forecasted  guidance,  accounts  payable,  rent  concessions,   vendor  rebates,
capitalization  of payroll and certain other costs and tax credit  transactions.
At the end of the first quarter of 2005, the SEC added certain tender offers for
limited partnership interests as an area of investigation.  AIMCO is cooperating
fully.  AIMCO is not able to predict  when the  investigation  will be resolved.
AIMCO does not believe  that the ultimate  outcome will have a material  adverse
effect  on its  consolidated  financial  condition  or  results  of  operations.
Similarly,  the  Managing  General  Partner  does not believe  that the ultimate
outcome will have a material  adverse effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.

Item 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  property consists of one apartment  complex.  The
following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the property for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                     2005         2004

      Fox Run Apartments                           92%          90%
        Plainsboro, New Jersey

The  Partnership's  financial  results depend upon a number of factors including
the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest
rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred to operate the  investment  property,
general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of
the  Partnership,  the  Managing  General  Partner  monitors  the rental  market
environment of its investment  property to assess the  feasibility of increasing
rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership
from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the Managing  General Partner
attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from the  burden  of  inflation-related
increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and  maintaining  a high  overall
occupancy  level.   However,   the  Managing  General  Partner  may  use  rental
concessions and rental rate reductions to offset  softening  market  conditions,
accordingly,  there is no guarantee  that the Managing  General  Partner will be
able to sustain such a plan.  Further,  a number of factors that are outside the
control of the  Partnership  such as the local economic  climate and weather can
adversely or positively affect the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  recognized net income of approximately $55,000 and $182,000 for
the three  months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,  respectively.  The decrease in
net  income  is due to an  increase  in total  expenses  partially  offset by an
increase  in total  revenues.  Total  expenses  increased  due to  increases  in
operating,  depreciation and property tax expenses partially offset by decreases
in general and administrative and interest expenses. Operating expense increased
primarily due to increases in  maintenance  and property  expenses.  Maintenance
expense increased  primarily due to an increase in snow removal costs.  Property
expense increased primarily due to an increase in salaries and related benefits.
Property  tax expense  increased  due to an increase in the property tax rate in
Plainsboro,   New  Jersey.   Depreciation  expense  increased  due  to  property
improvements and replacements  completed during the prior year. Interest expense
decreased  due to  regularly  scheduled  mortgage  payments  which  reduced  the
principal balance of the mortgage debt encumbering the Partnership's property.

General and  administrative  expenses decreased for the three months ended March
31, 2005 due to a decrease in New Jersey  partnership  tax due to a reduction in
the number of limited partners and a reduction in the cost of services  included
in management  reimbursements  to the Managing General Partner allowed under the
Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative expenses are
costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and
regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

Total  revenues  increased  primarily due to an increase in rental income at the
Partnership's  investment property.  Rental income increased due to increases in
occupancy and the average rental rates.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2005 the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$79,000  compared to  approximately  $199,000 at March 31,  2004.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased  approximately  $212,000  since  December 31, 2004 due to
approximately  $177,000  and $471,000 of cash used in  financing  and  investing
activities,  respectively,  partially offset by  approximately  $436,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of
principal  payments  on the  mortgage  encumbering  the  Partnership's  property
partially offset by advances from affiliates.  Cash used in investing activities
consisted of property improvements and replacements. The Partnership invests its
working capital reserves in interest-bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing  General  Partner
monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory  compliance.  For
example,  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  mandates  or  suggests  additional
compliance  measures  with  regard to  governance,  disclosure,  audit and other
areas.  In light of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will incur
higher expenses related to compliance.

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2005,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $484,000 of capital improvements at Fox Run Apartments,  primarily
consisting of water heater and floor covering replacements,  security equipment,
furniture and fixtures,  vehicles, water and sewer upgrades, interior decoration
and the  installation  of  washers  and  dryers in the  apartment  units.  These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow and advances from the Managing
General Partner.  The Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital  improvement
needs of the property.  While the  Partnership  has no material  commitments for
property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are
anticipated  during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical
condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.   To  the  extent  that  capital   improvements  are  completed,   the
Partnership's  distributable  cash flow,  if any, may be  adversely  affected at
least in the short term.

Subsequent  to March  31,  2005,  the  Managing  General  Partner  advanced  the
Partnership approximately $445,000 for operations at the Partnership's property.
Other than this advance from the Managing  General  Partner,  the  Partnership's
assets  are  thought to be  sufficient  for any near term  needs  (exclusive  of
capital improvements) of the Partnership.  The mortgage indebtedness encumbering
Fox Run Apartments of approximately $31,993,000 is being amortized over 20 years
and  matures  in  December  2021,  at  which  time it is  expected  to be  fully
amortized.

The Partnership had no  distributions  for three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004. Future cash  distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the timing of the debt maturity,  sale of the property and/or
refinancing.  The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a
monthly  basis.  There can be no assurance  that the  Partnership  will generate
sufficient   funds  from   operations,   after  required   capital   improvement
expenditures,  to permit  distributions  to its  partners in 2005 or  subsequent
periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 28,301 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 71.42% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2005. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO  Properties,  L.P, the  operating  partnership  of AIMCO,  either
through  private  purchases  or  tender  offers.  Pursuant  to  the  Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove the Managing General  Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 71.42% of
the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the Partnership.  Although the Managing General
Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the
Managing  General  Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to  AIMCO as its sole
stockholder.  As a  result,  the  duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as
managing general  partner,  to the Partnership and its limited partners may come
into  conflict with the duties of the Managing  General  Partner to AIMCO as its
sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles   generally  accepted  in  the  United  States,   which  require  the
Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  The Partnership believes that of
its significant  accounting policies,  the following may involve a higher degree
of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying amount of the property may be impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to, changes in national,  regional and local economic climate; local conditions,
such  as  an  oversupply  of  multifamily  properties;  competition  from  other
available  multifamily  property owners and changes in market rental rates.  Any
adverse  changes in these  factors could cause  impairment of the  Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response  to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes  in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a
straight-line  basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership  evaluates all
accounts  receivable  from  residents and  establishes  an allowance,  after the
application of security deposits,  for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.


ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On May 4, 2004,
the Objector filed a second appeal  challenging the court's use of a referee and
its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  The Managing General Partner and its affiliates
are  currently  scheduled  to file an answer to  Objector's  petition on May 18,
2005.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

As previously disclosed,  AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging
that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to
pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all hours worked in excess of forty per
week.  The  complaint  attempts to bring a collective  action under the FLSA and
seeks to certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland,  and the District of
Columbia.  Specifically,  the plaintiffs  contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and
NHP Management  Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that
they were required to be "on-call."  Additionally,  the complaint  alleges AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating  maintenance  workers for time that they worked in  responding to a
call  while  "on-call."  The  defendants  have  filed an answer  to the  amended
complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.  Oral argument  relating to the
certification of the collective  action is scheduled for May 12, 2005.  Although
the outcome of any  litigation is  uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on its
financial  condition or results of operations.  Similarly,  the Managing General
Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material adverse
effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated  financial  condition  or  results of
operations.

Item 5.     Other Information

            None.

Item 6.     Exhibits

            See Exhibit Index Attached.


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance  with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the  Registrant has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.



                                    ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                                    (A California Limited Partnership)
                                    (Registrant)


                                    By:   Angeles Realty Corporation II
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                          Stephen B. Waters
                                          Vice President


                                    Date: May 12, 2005



<PAGE>




                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit

3.1               Amended Agreement of Limited  Partnership dated February 26,
                  1982,   filed  in  Form  10-K  dated   November   30,  1983,
                  incorporated herein by reference.

10.13             Promissory  Note between New York Life  Insurance,  a New York
                  mutual  insurance  company  and  Fox Run AP XI,  LP.,  a South
                  Carolina limited  partnership dated December 5, 2001, filed as
                  exhibit  10.13  to the  Partnership's  Annual  Report  on Form
                  10-KSB dated March 25, 2002, incorporated herein by reference.

31.1              Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2              Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1              Certification   Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
                  Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.





Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners
      XI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior  Vice  President  of  Angeles  Realty
                                    Corporation  II,  equivalent  of  the  chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership




Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners
      XI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005

                                    /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Stephen B. Waters
                                    Vice    President   of   Angeles    Realty
                                    Corporation II,
                                    equivalent of the chief financial  officer
                                     of the
                                     Partnership

Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners XI
(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha
L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief  executive  officer of the  Partnership,
and Stephen B. Waters,  as the equivalent of the chief financial  officer of the
Partnership,  each hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  May 12, 2005


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  May 12, 2005


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.