alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1007.3 Requests by an individual for information or access. ( a ) Any individual may request information on whether a system of records maintained by the Board contains any information pertaining to him or her, or may request access to his or her record or to any information pertaining to him or her which is contained in a system of records. All requests shall be directed to the Privacy Officer, Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001.
( b ) A request for information or for access to records under this part may be made by mail or in person. The request shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing and signed by the individual making the request; and,
( 2 ) Include the full name of the individual seeking the information or record, along with his or her home and business addresses and telephone numbers.
( c ) For each system of records from which information is sought, the request shall: ( 1 ) Specify the title and identifying number as it appears in the system notice published by the Board;
( 2 ) Provide such additional identifying information, if any, as may be required by the system notice;
( 3 ) Describe the specific information or kind of information sought within that system of records; and,
( 4 ) Set forth any unusual arrangements sought concerning the time, place, or form of access.
( d ) The Board will respond in writing to a request made under this section within ten days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays) after receipt of the request. If a definitive reply cannot be given within ten days, the request will be acknowledged and an explanation will be given of the status of the request.
( e ) The individual either will be notified in writing of where and when he or she may obtain access to the records requested or will be given the name, address and telephone number of the member of the Board staff with whom he or she should communicate to make further arrangements for access.
[41 FR 3087, Jan. 21, 1976, as amended at 64 FR 53266, Oct. 1, 1999; 74 FR 52903, Oct. 15, 2009]
§ 1184.2 Contents of a pooling application. A pooling application filed under 49 U.S.C. 14302 should include the following information: ( a ) An identification of all the carriers who are parties to the pooling agreement;
( b ) A general description of the transaction;
( c ) A specific description of the operating authorities sought to be pooled;
( d ) The basis to establish that the agreement is a genuine pooling arrangement (as opposed to a lease or interline arrangement);
( e ) A description of what applicants consider to be the relevant transportation markets affected by the proposed agreement;
( f ) The competitive routing and service alternatives that would remain if the agreement is approved, to the best of applicant's knowledge;
( g ) If there is a lessening of such alternatives, an estimate of the public benefits that will accrue from approval, or new competition that will arise, which would offset such lessening;
( h ) A narrative assessment of how the pooling arrangement will affect present and future competition in the area, including a description of the projected volume of traffic, the revenues, and the commodities which will be subject to the pooling agreement;
( i ) Certification that rates set for traffic moving under the agreement do not violate the restrictions on collective ratemaking contained in 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IV and Board regulations;
( j ) A narrative statement as to the relative transportation importance of the pooling agreement as it would affect the public and the national transportation system;
( k ) If any known non-pooling carriers authorized to transport the subject traffic are not included in the pooling arrangement explain why, and explain whether inclusion would enhance or restrain competition;
( l ) A statement of the energy and environmental effects of the agreement, if any; and
( m ) Certification by applicant, or its representatives, that the representations made in the application are, to the best of applicant's knowledge and belief, true and complete.
As appendices, applicants must submit: (1) A copy of the pooling agreement; (2) a copy of the specific operating authority of each carrier which is the subject of the pooling agreement; and (3) a caption summary (for Federal Register publication) of the pooling transaction sought to be approved. [46 FR 21181, Apr. 9, 1981. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 49595, Nov. 1, 1982; 64 FR 53269, Oct. 1, 1999]
#### Mullin *v.*Mullin.

On good cause being shown, a writ of restitution may be awarded for alimony that has been granted in a suit for a divorce.

Libel EOR. divorce, upon which a decree in favor of the libellant was made at the May term, 1878, and an award of alimony, to the amount of 11,500. At the January term, 1879, the libellee filed his petition for a rehearing, and a reversal or modification of said decree. His petition was sent to a referee, who reported that the decree of divorce and alimony, made at the May term, 1878, be so modified that the libellant recover no alimony; and that the libellee have a writ of restitution against the libellant for the amount of alimony which she has collected, or which has been paid her, under the former decree.

The. court ordered judgment upon the report. The libellant excepted, claiming that in the matter of a decree of alimony the court had no power to grant a writ of restitution.

Atherton, for the libellant.

Stevens, for the libellee.

Foster, J.

Courts have power to set aside, vacate, modify, or amend their judgments, for good cause shown. *Aldrich*v. *Wright,*57 N. H. 104; *Judge of Probate*v. *Webster,*46 N. H. 518; *Rees*v. *Morgan,*3 Durn. & E. 349. In this respect decrees in divorce suits stand upon the same footing as other judgments. *Bellows,*C. J., in *Adams*v. Adams, 51 N. H. 388, 396; G. L., *c.*182, s. 15. It may be reasonably inferred from the referee’s report, that the alimony, or a part of it, has been paid to the libellant. But however that fact may be, it does not affect the power of the court to award a writ of restitution. The ancient practice was to award restitution on the reversal of the judgment, only where it appeared by the return of the execution that the damages or costs erroneously awarded by the court below had been actually levied or paid over to the defendant in error. And if the fact did not appear upon the record, the party was put to his *scire facias*to ascertain the fact, — upon the return of which restitution was awarded. 2 Tidd Pr. (3 Am. ed.) 1,033; 2 Salk. 588; 3 Bouv. Inst. 555; *Pittsfield*v. *Barnstead,*38 N. H. 115, 123; *Safford*v. *Stevens,*2 Wend. 158, 164. The practice in New York is now regulated by the code, but the common-law procedure is recognized in *O’Gara*v. *Kearney,*77 N. Y. 423. See 2 Fisher Dig. 450.

We are unable to conceive of any reason why a judgment in a divorce suit should bear an exceptional character.

*Exception overruled.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report of Inuvo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard K. Howe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 3, 2014





/s/ Richard K. Howe


Richard K. Howe


Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CompuMed, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phuong Dang, Controller(Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Phuong  Dang                   |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                     |
| Phuong Dang                              |
| Controller (Principal Financial Officer) |
| August 13, 2002                          |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

                    MAXUS REAL PROPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Maxus Real Property  Investors-Four,
L.P. (the  "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, David L. Johnson,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Maxus
Capital  Corp.,  General  Partner of the  Partnership,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership  as of February 28, 2005 (the last date of the period covered by the
Report).


/s/ David L. Johnson
--------------------
David L. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Maxus Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership
April 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1829
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               54
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, May 11, 1995 (64), Para 64.11 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 682-683]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.64.11  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. MINETA:

       Page 170, line 19, strike ``issuing''.
       Page 170, line 20, before ``any'' insert ``issuing''.
       Page 170, line 24, strike ``or''.
       Page 171, line 1, before ``any'' insert ``issuing''.
       Page 171, line 3 strike the period and insert a semicolon.
       Page 171, after line 3, insert the following:
       ``(3) granting under section 301(g) a modification of the 
     requirements of section 301(b)(2)(A);
       ``(4) issuing a permit under section 402 which under 
     section 301(p)(5) modifies the requirements of section 301, 
     302, 306, or 307;
       ``(5) extending under section 301(k) a deadline for a point 
     source to comply with any limitation under section 
     301(b)(1)(A), 301(b)(2)(A), or 301(b)(2)(E) or otherwise 
     modifying under section 301(k) the conditions of a permit 
     under section 402;
       ``(6) issuing a permit under section 402 which modifies 
     under section 301(q) the requirements of section 301(b), 306, 
     or 307;
       ``(7) issuing a permit under section 402 which modifies 
     under section 301(r) the requirements of section 301(b), 306, 
     or 307;
       ``(8) renewing, reissuing, or modifying a permit to which 
     section 401(o)(1) applies if the permittee has received a 
     permit modification under section 301(q) or 301(r) or the 
     exception under section 402(o)(2)(F) applies;
       ``(9) extending under section 307(e) the deadline for 
     compliance with applicable national categorical pretreatment 
     standards or otherwise modifying under section 307(e) 
     pretreatment requirements of section 307(b);
       ``(10) waiving or modifying under section 307(f) 
     pretreatment requirements of section 307(b);
       ``(11) allowing under section 307(g) any person that 
     introduces silver into a publicly owned treatment works to 
     comply with a code of management practices in lieu of 
     complying with any pretreatment requirement for silver;
       ``(12) establishing under section 316(b)(3) a standard 
     other than best technology available for existing point 
     sources;
       ``(13) approving a pollutant transfer pilot project under 
     section 321(g)(1); or
       ``(14) issuing a permit pursuant to section 402(r)(1) with 
     a limitation that does not meet applicable water quality 
     standards. 

[[Page 683]]

It was decided in the

Yeas

152

negative

Nays

271
```
#### § 1117.1 Petitions.

A party seeking relief not provided for in any other rule may file a petition for such relief. The petition should contain (a) a short, plain statement of the grounds upon which the Board's jurisdiction is based; (b) a short plain statement of the claim showing that the petitioner is entitled to relief; and (c) a demand for the relief the petitioner believes is appropriate.

[47 FR 49569, Nov. 1, 1982]
#### G. P. Rollins v. The State.

*No. 387.*

*Decided February 7.*

1. Continuance. — An application for continuance, to be sufficient, must state the facts expected to be proved by the absent witness; mere conclusions, or vague, indefinite allegations, will not suffice.

2. Charge and Requested Instructions—Practice—When the charge of the court is sufficiently full and explicit upon an issue in the case, it is not error to refuse requested instructions upon the same issue.

3. Theft—Market Value.—On a trial for theft of a saddle, where the evidence showed that the actual value was $22, and that since its recovery by the owner, after it was stolen, he had refused that sum for it, *held,*legitimate and sufficient proof of “ market value.”

Appeal from the District Court of Johnson.' Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

Appellant was indicted for the theft of a saddle, of the value of $25, the property of one Will Hunsucker. The trial resulted in his conviction, with punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

No statement necessary.

*Ward & Weir,*for appellant, filed an able and interesting brief in the case.

*B. L. Henry,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

1. This conviction was for theft of a saddle. Continuance was sought for the testimony of one Jones, by whom defendant expected to prove he “ traded for the saddle alleged to have been stolen.” Mere conclusions, or vague, indefinite allegations, will not suffice in setting out testimony expected to be shown by absent witnesses. The facts they are expected to detail should be stated definitely. Willson’s Crim. Proc., sec. 2165.

If Jones was present and witnessed such trade, he was cognizant of the attendant circumstances, and the application should have stated the facts. When was the trade made, and where ? From whom was the purchase made, or with whom was the trade consummated ? These matters should have been stated.

2. The requested charges in reference to venue were correctly refused. The court sufficiently charged upon that issue. The testimony conclusively shows the saddle to have been taken in Johnson County, and that it was within a few hours thereafter taken from defendant in the town of Alvarado, in said county. The venue was not a disputed question, under the evidence adduced on the trial.

*5673. The testimony as to the value was properly admitted. The actual value of the saddle was shown to be $22, and this was not contradicted, and that the owner had since its recovery refused that sum for it. This was sufficient and legitimate proof of its *“*market value.”

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
Basic Form
 GSI Commerce, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan  Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice
 Company Plan Award
 Participant:Date of Grant:Number of Shares subject to Award:Consideration:
    
    Your Services to the Company
 Vesting Schedule
 
  ̈  ̈
  Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Other Agreements:




---



##### 



GSI Commerce, Inc.
    
    ParticipantBy:Signature
    
    
    
    SignatureName:
    
    
    
    Name:Print
    
    
    
    PrintTitle:
    
    
    
    Date:Date:
 Attachments




---



##### 



Attachment I
 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
 GSI Commerce, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan  Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
 Grant Notice Agreement Company Plan Common Stock Award
  1. Distribution of Shares of Common Stock Original Distribution Date
 2. Consideration.
 3. Vesting
 4. Number of Shares
 5. Conditions to Issuance and Delivery of Shares




---



##### 



6. Execution of Documents.
 7. Non-transferability.
 8. Award not a Service Contract
 9. Unsecured Obligation




---



##### 



10. Withholding Obligations
 (a)
 (b)
 11. Notices
 12. Headings .
 13. Amendment .
 14. Miscellaneous.
 (a)




---



##### 



(b)
 (c)
 (d)
 15. Governing Plan Document
 16. Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans.
 17. Choice of Law .
 Severability.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 129 (Friday, July 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 37055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission


Foreign Claims Settlement Commission; F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 
5-07

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

    Date and Time: Friday, July 20, 2007, at 1:30 p.m.
    Subject Matter: Issuance of Amended Proposed Decisions and 
Amended Final Decisions in claims against Albania.
    Status: Open.

    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC.
Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 07-3312 Filed 7-3-07; 11:58 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
Exhibit 4.17

English Translation for Reference


 


Letter
of Undertaking





 


It
is hereby undertaken that:


 


Lai Fulin, a citizen
of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as “China”), with the Chinese ID card number: [Redacted], holds 5% equity interest of Shenzhen Zhongguan Agricultural Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Zhongguan”);


 


The above shareholder
hereby irrevocably undertakes to Agria Brother Biotech (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Agria Brother”)
as follows:


 


Once I, as a shareholder
of Zhongguan, receive any dividends, bonuses or other distributions from Zhongguan, I shall transfer all such incomes remaining
after the deduction of any taxes payable thereon, without compensation, to Agria Brother and/or any person designated by it unless
this is restricted by laws, regulations or judicial proceedings.


 


	Undertaken by (Signature):	 
	 	 
	/s/ Lai Fulin	 
	 	 
	May 7, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000702402
<NAME>                             DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1981-1 LIMITED PTRSHP
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                108,522
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          59,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      167,564
<PP&E>                             41,116,631
<DEPRECIATION>                     41,053,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        233,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  61,767
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             86,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          233,609
<SALES>                                38,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       39,417
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          38,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           665
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       665
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>