[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28674-28675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Action Affecting Export Privileges; Bill Chen, aka Yueqiang Chen; 
In the Matter of: Bill Chen, AKA Yueqiang Chen, Manager, Data Physics 
China, RM. 1509, Building 2, Xinquduan Jiayan, No. 5 Changchunquia 
Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China, 100089 and 615 Blossom 
Hill Road, <greek-i>17, Los Gatos, CA 95032, Respondent: Order 
Temporarily Denying Export Privileges

    Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations 
(``EAR''),\1\ I hereby grant the Bureau of Industry and Security's 
request for an Order Temporarily Denying the Export Privileges of 
Respondent, Bill Chen aka Yueqiang Chen, for 180 days as I find that 
the TDO is necessary in the public interest to prevent an imminent 
violation of the EAR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2007). The EAR are issued under the 
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. Sec.  
2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been 
in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 
17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended most recently by 
the Notice of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44551, (August 7, 2006)), has 
continued the EAR in effect under the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. Sec.  1701-1706 (2000)) (``IEEPA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Legal Standard

    Pursuant to Sec.  766.24(b) of the EAR, the Assistant Secretary may 
issue a TDO ``upon a showing by BIS that the order is necessary in the 
public interest to prevent an imminent violation of the * * * EAR.'' 
``A violation may be `imminent' either in time or in degree of 
likelihood.'' 15 CFR 766.24(b)(3). This includes a violation that ``is 
about to occur, or that the general circumstances of the matter under 
investigation or case under criminal or administrative charges 
demonstrate a likelihood of future violations.'' Id. Significant, 
deliberate, and covert violations are more probative of imminence and 
the likelihood of future violations than lesser technical ones. Id. A 
``lack of information establishing the precise time a violation may 
occur does not preclude a finding that a violation is imminent, so long 
as there is sufficient reason to believe the likelihood of a 
violation.'' Id.

II. Findings

    Respondent has been under a temporary denial order since May 12, 
2006 for his role in selling and shipping items subject to the EAR to 
end-users in China who are engaged in the design, development, 
production and use of cruise missile systems without the required 
export licenses. On May 24, 2006, the Respondent was indicated by a 
federal grand in the Northern District of California for violating the 
EAR in connection with five unlicensed exports, occurring as early as 
January 22, 2003 and as recently as July 3, 2005, to end-users in China 
knowing that such items would be used in the design, development, 
production, and use of missiles. On April 6, 2007, Mr. Chen submitted a 
declaration that he would assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against 
self incrimination in connection with any questions that would be 
raised during his deposition in a related administrative proceeding. 
Then, on April 30, 2007, a U.S. Magistrate Judge granted Respondent's 
request to travel to China to visit ailing family members while the 
indictment is pending against him. Based upon this authorization, Mr. 
Chen has departed for China and is scheduled return in late May 2007. 
While Mr. Chen has been placed on administrative leave, he remains an 
employee of Data Physics. Additionally, BIS has submitted evidence to 
me that shows that Respondent has played a role in selling items 
subject to the EAR

[[Page 28675]]

to entities in China on BIS's Entity List without the required export 
licenses.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 15 CFR 744 Supplement No. 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I find that the evidence presented by BIS demonstrates that the 
Respondent has violated the EAR, that such violations have been 
significant, deliberate and covert, and that there is a likelihood of 
future violations. Accordingly, I find that issuing a TDO against Bill 
Chen for 180 days is necessary in the public interest to prevent an 
imminent violation of the EAR.

III. Order

    It is Therefore Ordered:
    First, that the Respondent, BILL CHEN, AKA Yueqiang Chen, of Data 
Physics China, RM. 1509, Building 2, Xinquduan Jiayan, No. 5 
Changchunquia Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China, 100089 and 
of 615 Blossom Hill Road, <greek-i>17, Los Gatos, California 95032 (the 
``Denied Person''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any 
way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology 
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be 
exported from the United States that is subject to the Export 
Administration Regulations (``EAR''), or in any other activity subject 
to the EAR, including, but not limited to:
    A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License 
Exception, or export control document;
    B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, 
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, 
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, 
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the 
United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity 
subject to the EAR; or
    C. Benefiting in any way from any transaction involving any item 
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to 
the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR.
    Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the 
following:
    A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item 
subject to the EAR;
    B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted 
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or 
control to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United 
States, including financing or other support activities related to a 
transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire 
such ownership, possession or control;
    C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition 
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to 
the EAR that has been exported from the United States;
    D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the Untied states any item 
subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will 
be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
    E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR 
that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is 
owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any 
item, or whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the 
Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to 
the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States. For 
purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, 
repair, modification or testing.
    Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided 
in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or 
business organization related to any of the Denied Person by 
affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the 
conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the 
provisions of this Order.
    Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or 
other transaction subject to the EAR where the only items involved that 
are subject to the EAR are the foreign-produced direct product of U.S.-
origin technology.
    In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, 
the Respondent may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full 
written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the 
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
    In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, 
BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not 
later than 20 days before the expiration date. The Respondent may 
oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written submission 
with the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement, which 
must be received not later than seven days before the expiration date 
of the Order.
    A copy of this order shall be served on the Respondent and shall be 
published in the Federal Register.
    This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect for 
180 days.

    Entered this 16th day of May, 2007.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 07-2525 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M