alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:49 PM

To: Brunner, Christine

Subject: Clean RIA file--EO12866 Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM FRN

Attachments: EO12866_Tier_3_2060-AQ86_FRM_RIA_20140228.pdf

From: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:27 PM 

To: 'Whiteman, Chad' 

Subject: Clean RIA file--EO12866 Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM FRN 

Here is the clean RIA 

From: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 12:58 PM 

To: 'Whiteman, Chad' 

Subject: Clean and Redline FRN Files--EO12866 Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM FRN 

Attached are the clean and redlined files for the preamble and regs. 

RIA to come separately.
###### Editorial Note on Part 106

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 106.80 Public meeting procedures.

A public meeting is a non-adversarial, fact-finding proceeding conducted by a PHMSA representative. Generally, public meetings are announced in the Federal Register. Interested persons are invited to attend and to present their views to the agency on specific issues. There are no formal pleadings and no adverse parties, and any regulation issued afterward is not necessarily based exclusively on the record of the meeting. Sections 556 and 557 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 556 and 557) do not apply to public meetings under this part.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 22, 1995 (48), Para 48.11 Welfare Reform]
[Page 424]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.48.11  welfare reform

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. OXLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 119 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 4) to restore the American family, reduce illegtimacy, 
control welfare spending, and reduce welfare dependence.
  Mr. LINDER, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the chair; 
and after some time spent therein,
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending November 20, 2010

|Filer                            | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Notice by the House family control group, Batesville, Arkansas, to gain control of First Community Bancshares, Inc., Batesville, Arkansas. The House family control group consists of:  Verlene H. House Revocable Trust, Verlene H. House as trustee; White River Bituminous, Inc.; Edward House; Howard House; Dianne Lamberth; Marcus Lamberth; Lauren Lamberth Patterson, all of Batesville, Arkansas; and Lance Lamberth, San Francisco, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/08/2010
|Newspaper:                       | Not available
|Federal Register:                | 12/08/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2011 (January 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 27, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.8 After Recess--12:23 P.M.]
[Page 699]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.8  after recess--12:23 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, called the House to 
order.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, June 26, 1995 (86), Para 86.7 Subsequent Action on a Reported Bill Sequentially Referred]
[Page 1041]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.86.7  subsequent action on a reported bill sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1655. Referral to the Committee on National Security 
     extended for a period ending not later than July 19, 1995.
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7492

MARK ENGLISH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Elizabeth Kay Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:19

- cv - 00571

- EKD

- JCH )

Submitted : February 18, 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Mark English , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark English seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244( d)(1)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a const itutional right. Gonzalez , 565 U.S. at 140

- 41 (citing Slack v.
McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because English’s informal brief does not challenge t he dispositive timeliness determination by the district court, he has forfeited appellate review. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited t o issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argum ent would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
#### § 502.228 Request for enlargement of time to file exceptions and replies to exceptions.

Requests for enlargement of time to file exceptions, and briefs in support of such exceptions, or replies to exceptions, must conform to the applicable provisions of § 502.102. Any enlargement of time granted will automatically extend by the same period, the date for the filing of notice or review by the Commission. [Rule 228.]

[80 FR 57307, Sept. 23, 2015]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

At 80 FR 57307, Sept. 23, 2015, § 502.228 was amended; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1573 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1573

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties 
      for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 1995

Mr. Ney (for himself, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Barr, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. 
  Fox of Pennsylvania, Ms. Molinari, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Calvert, and Mr. Traficant) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties 
      for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Retention Act of 1995''.

SEC. TAKING A FIREARM FROM A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 116. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly takes a firearm--
            ``(1) from the person of a law enforcement officer, while 
        such officer is engaged in the performance of official duties; 
        and
            ``(2) against that officer's will;
or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
    ``(b) The punishment for an offense under this section is--
            ``(1) in the case of an offense other than an attempt, or 
        an offense that is an attempt during which the firearm is 
        discharged (other than intentionally by the officer), a fine 
        under this title and imprisonment for not less than 10 nor more 
        than 15 years; and
            ``(2) in the case of any other offense that is an attempt, 
        a fine under this title and imprisonment for not less than 5 
        nor more than 10 years.
    ``(c) A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall not 
run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed with 
respect to the same criminal episode.
    ``(d) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `firearm' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 921 of this title; and
            ``(2) the term `law enforcement officer' means a person 
        designated in section 1114 of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 7 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``116. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1007.12 Exemptions. ( a ) Investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes are exempt from portions of the Privacy Act of 1974 and of these rules on the basis and to the extent that individual access to these files could impair the effectiveness and orderly conduct of the Board's enforcement program. *Provided, however,* That if any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit to which he or she would otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or for which he or she would otherwise be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, such materials shall be provided to the individual; except to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.
( b ) Investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for employment with or contracts with the Board are exempt from portions of the Privacy Act of 1974 and of these rules to the extent that it identifies a confidential source. This is done in order to encourage persons from whom information is sought to provide information to the Board which, absent assurances of confidentiality, they might otherwise be unwilling to give. However, if practicable, material identifying a confidential source shall be extracted or summarized in a manner which protects the source, and the summary or extract shall be provided to the requesting individual.
( c ) Complaints and investigatory materials compiled by the Board's Office of Inspector General are exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the regulations in this part, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), except subsections (b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11) and (i) to the extent that the system of records pertains to the enforcement of criminal laws. Complaint and investigatory materials compiled by the Board's Office of Inspector General for law enforcement purposes also are exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the regulations of this part, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
[41 FR 3087, Jan. 21, 1976, as amended at 58 FR 15291, Mar. 22, 1993; 58 FR 28520, May 14, 1993]
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Red Horse Entertainment Corporation
File No. 0-23015

   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In connection with the Annual Report of Red Horse Entertainment Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Wayne M. Rogers,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;  and (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.



Date: March 26, 2004                      By:   /s/ Wayne M. Rogers
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Red Horse  Entertainment  Corporation  and will be  retained by Red
Horse  Entertainment  Corporation  and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                               Safety-Kleen Corp.
                 Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
                   ($ in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                     Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                         February 28,            February 28,
                                                     -------------------     -------------------
                                                        1999      1998         1999       1998
                                                        ----      ----         ----       ----
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>          <C>        <C>   

Basic:
  Income available to common stockholders ........   $ 18,245   $  3,556     $ 46,017   $ 13,700
                                                     ========   ========     ========   ========

  Weighted average common stock outstanding (000s)     88,386     45,571       88,120     45,381
                                                     ========   ========     ========   ========

  Income per share ...............................   $   0.21   $   0.08     $   0.53   $   0.30
                                                     ========   ========     ========   ========


Diluted:
  Net income .....................................   $ 18,245   $  3,556     $ 46,017   $ 13,700
  Add back: interest expense on conversion of
    subordinated convertible debenture ...........      2,625       --          5,250      5,171
                                                     --------   --------     --------   --------
  Income available to common stockholders, plus
    assumed conversions ..........................   $ 20,870   $  3,556     $ 51,267   $ 18,871
                                                     ========   ========     ========   ========

  Weighted average common stock outstanding (000s)     88,386     45,571       88,120     45,381
  Dilutive effect of stock options ...............         31         90           49        113
  Dilutive effect of conversion of $350,000,000
    subordinated convertible debenture at $15.00 .     23,333       --         23,333     23,333
                                                     --------   --------     --------   --------
  Diluted average shares outstanding .............    111,750     45,661      111,502     68,827
                                                     ========   ========     ========   ========

  Diluted income per share .......................   $   0.19   $   0.08     $   0.46   $   0.27
                                                     ========   ========     ========   ========

All per share  amounts  have been  restated to effect the  one-for-four  reverse
stock split effective the close of business on November 30, 1998.
</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending April 24, 2010

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|SOUTHERN BANCORP BANK | * Branch       | Southern Bancorp Bank, Arkadelphia, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 206 Airport Road, Hot Springs, Arkansas. | Newspaper:04/28/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | 04/28/2010    
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ALLEN FEINGOLD,

Petitioner

v.

JOSEPH AVERSA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 331 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.