alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





I, Richard D. Crowley, Jr. of
Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to the requirement
set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:





(i)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
December 27, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 4, 2010
              
              /S/ RICHARD D. CROWLEY, JR.
                Richard
      D. Crowley, Jr.
                Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal Financial and
      Accounting Officer)


A signed
original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 17, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1103.20 Practitioner's fees and related practices. ( a ) *Establishing fees.* In establishing fees, a practitioner shall avoid charges which overestimate the value of his advice and services. A client's ability to pay cannot justify a charge in excess of the value of the service although a client's poverty may require a lesser charge or even no charge at all. Publicly quoted fees should be adhered to when actual charges are made. Practitioners are bound to charge no more than the quoted rates for 30 days following the date of their quotations unless a different period of time for the effectiveness of such rates is clearly specified when quoted, or unless permission to charge a higher rate is obtained from the Vice Chairman of the Board.
( b ) *Compensation, commission, and rebates.* A practitioner shall accept no compensation, commission, rebates, or other advantages from the parties in a proceeding other than his client without the knowledge and consent of his client after full disclosure.
( c ) *Contingent fees.* Contingent fees should be only those sanctioned by law. In no case, except a charity case, should fees be entirely contingent upon success.
( d ) *Division of fees.* Fees for services should be divided only with another member of the bar of practitioners and should be based upon a division of service or responsibility. It is unethical for a practitioner to retain laymen to solicit his employment in pending or prospective cases, and to reward them by a share of the fees. Such a practice cannot be too severely condemned.
( e ) *Suing clients for fees.* Controversies with clients concerning compensation are to be entered into only insofar as they are compatible with self-respect and with the right to receive reasonable compensation for services. Lawsuits against clients should be resorted to only to prevent injustice, imposition or fraud.
( f ) *Acquiring interest in litigation.* The practitioner shall not purchase or otherwise acquire any pecuniary interest in the subject matter of litigation which the practitioner is conducting.
( g ) *Expenses.* A practitioner may not properly agree with a client that the practitioner shall pay or bear the expenses of litigation. He may in good faith advance expenses as a matter of convenience but must do so subject to reimbursement by the client. A practitioner shall bill and collect from a client, and thereafter retain only such payments and reimbursements for expenses as have actually been incurred on behalf of the client.
( h ) *Witnesses' compensation.* Compensation of a witness is not to be made contingent on the success of a case in which the witness is called.
( i ) *Dealing with trust property.* Money of the client or other trust property coming into the possession of the practitioner should be reported promptly, and, except with the client's knowledge and consent, should not be commingled with the practitioner's private property or be put to the practitioner's private use.
[47 FR 49549, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 81 FR 8853, Feb. 23, 2016]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1824

To authorize the Secretary of Labor to establish volunteer programs for

the protection of employees of occupational hazards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1995

Mr. HAYES (for himself and Mr. BAKER of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Labor to establish volunteer

programs for the protection of employees of occupational

hazards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voluntary Protection

5 Authorization Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS.

7 The Secretary of Labor shall establish cooperative

8 programs to encourage the establishment of comprehen-
2

•HR 1824 IH

1 sive safety and health management systems which in2 clude—

3 (1) requirements for systematic assessment of

4 hazards;

5 (2) comprehensive hazard prevention, mitiga6 tion, and control programs;

7 (3) active and meaningful management, leader8 ship, and employee participation in the voluntary

9 program described in section 3; and

10 (4) employee safety and health training.

11 SEC. 3. VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM.

12 The Secretary of Labor shall establish a voluntary

13 protection program to encourage the achievement of excel14 lence in both the technical and managerial protection of

15 employees from occupational hazards as follows:

16 (1) Volunteers for the program shall be re17 quired to submit an application to the Secretary

18 demonstrating that the worksite with respect to

19 which the application is made meets such qualifica20 tions as the Secretary may prescribe for participa21 tion in the program.

22 (2) There shall be onsite evaluations by rep23 resentatives of the Secretary to ensure a high level

24 of protection of employees. Such onsite visits shall

25 not result in enforcement citations under the Occu-
3

•HR 1824 IH

1 pational Safety and Health Act of 1970 unless rep2 resentatives of the Secretary observe hazards for

3 which no agreement can be made to abate such haz4 ards in a reasonable amount of time.

5 (3) Volunteers who are approved for participa6 tion by the Secretary shall assure the Secretary that

7 information about their safety and health program

8 shall be made readily available to the Secretary to

9 share with employers.

10 (4) Continued participation in the program will

11 require periodic reevaluations by the Secretary.

12 (5) A site with respect to which a program has

13 been approved shall during participation in the pro14 gram be exempt from inspections and certain paper15 work requirements to be determined by the Sec16 retary, except inspections or investigations arising

17 from employee complaints, fatalities, catastrophes,

18 or significant toxic releases.

Æ
#### § 1242.01 Expenses solely related to freight service and passenger service.

The Uniform System of Accounts for Railroad Companies (49 CFR part 1201) requires that carriers assign directly to freight service or to passenger service, including allied services, the expenses, taxes, and purchased services incurred solely for the benefit of either freight or passenger service.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Redding Bancorp, a California Corporation (the
company), does certify that:  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and  2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
Company. Dated: May 11, 2004 /s/ Michael C. Mayer
    
    /s/ Linda J. MilesMichael C. Mayer
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit  32.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the quarterly report
of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
August 16, 2010







By  
/s/ John
Benson.





John
Benson, Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 BANCORPSOUTH, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), of BancorpSouth, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Aubrey B. Patterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




DATE: August 5, 2011
By:
/s/ Aubrey B. PattersonAubrey B. PattersonChairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                   COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

                               MGI PHARMA, INC.
                                  (Unaudited)


The following information is required in computations of primary and fully
diluted loss per common share for each period:

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                             Three Months Ended
                                                  March 31,
                                         -----------------------
                                            1997         1996
                                         ----------   ----------
<S>                                    <C>           <C> 
Loss:
 Net loss                              $  (535,803)  $  (803,507)


Common shares:
 Adjusted weighted shares
    outstanding (a)                     14,089,380    12,784,257


Loss per common share:
 Net loss                                $   (0.04)  $     (0.06)
</TABLE> 

(a) Net loss per common share shown on the face of the statements of operations
is the equivalent of a simple capital structure presentation since it excludes
common stock equivalents as their effect is antidilutive. There are no pro forma
fully diluted share outstanding adjustments, so primary and fully diluted share
amounts are identical.
§ 92.03-1 Navigation bridge visibility. Each cargo and miscellaneous vessel which is 100 meters (328 feet) or more in length and contracted for on or after September 7, 1990, must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The field of vision from the navigation bridge, whether the vessel is in a laden or unladen condition, must be such that: ( 1 ) From the conning position, the view of the sea surface is not obscured forward of the bow by more than the lesser of two ship lengths or 500 meters (1,640 feet) from dead ahead to 10 degrees on either side of the vessel. Within this arc of visibility any blind sector caused by cargo, cargo gear, or other permanent obstruction must not exceed 5 degrees.
( 2 ) From the conning position, the horizontal field of vision extends over an arc from at least 22.5 degrees abaft the beam on one side of the vessel, through dead ahead, to at least 22.5 degrees abaft the beam on the other side of the vessel. Blind sectors forward of the beam caused by cargo, cargo gear, or other permanent obstruction must not exceed 10 degrees each, nor total more than 20 degrees, including any blind sector within the arc of visibility described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) From each bridge wing, the field of vision extends over an arc from at least 45 degrees on the opposite bow, through dead ahead, to at least dead astern.
( 4 ) From the main steering position, the field of vision extends over and arc from dead ahead to at least 60 degrees on either side of the vessel.
( 5 ) From each bridge wing, the respective side of the vessel is visible forward and aft.
( b ) Windows fitted on the navigation bridge must be arranged so that: ( 1 ) Framing between windows is kept to a minimum and is not installed immediately in front of any work station.
( 2 ) Front windows are inclined from the vertical plane, top out, at an angle of not less than 10 degrees and not more than 25 degrees.
( 3 ) The height of the lower edge of the front windows is limited to prevent any obstruction of the forward view previously described in this section.
( 4 ) The height of the upper edge of the front windows allows a forward view of the horizon at the conning position, for a person with a height of eye of 1.8 meters (71 inches), when the vessel is at a forward pitch angle of 20 degrees.
( c ) Polarized or tinted windows must not be fitted.
[CGD 85-099, 55 FR 32248, Aug. 8, 1990, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58282, Sept. 29, 2014]
§ 54.25-7 Requirement for postweld heat treatment (modifies UCS-56). ( a ) Postweld heat treatment is required for all carbon and low alloy steel Class I, I-L, and II-L vessels regardless of thickness. (Refer to table 2 to § 54.01-5 for applicable requirements.)
( b ) Cargo tanks which are fabricated of carbon or low alloy steel as Class II pressure vessels, designed for pressures exceeding 100 pounds per square inch gage and used in the storage or transportation of liquefied compressed gases must be postweld heat treated regardless of thickness.
[CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9977, June 17, 1970]
§ 202.6 Grant or denial of review. ( a ) A petition or request for review by the Secretary of any decision, report, order or action of the Board will not be granted unless significant and important questions of over-all policy requiring the Secretary's attention are involved or there appears to be significant legal, policy, or factual error in the Board's action.
( b ) The parties and the Secretary of the Board will be notified, by Order, of the Secretary's decision to review a case on his own motion, and of his decision to review or to deny review of a case where a petition or request concerning review has been filed.
( c ) Promptly upon notice of a decision by the Secretary to review a case subject to review under section 6.01 of Department Order 117-A, the Secretary of the Board shall certify to the Secretary the complete record of the proceeding before the Board and shall serve upon all parties a copy of such certification which shall adequately identify the matter so certified. The Secretary of the Board shall further serve upon all parties a copy of any further communication from the Board or Maritime Administration on such a case.
<PAGE>


                                 Exhibit 12.1


     Statement of Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
         Stock Dividend Requirements for the nine month periods ended
                  September 30, 1999 and September 30, 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   For the nine months ended
                                              September 30, 1999   September 30, 1998
                                              ------------------   ------------------
<S>                                                <C>                  <C>
Net income                                         $   97,039           $   60,964
Interest expense                                      104,199               47,724
Amortization of capitalized interest                       45                   --
                                                   ----------           ----------
Earnings before interest                              201,283              108,688

Interest expense                                      104,199               47,724
Interest capitalized                                      952                   --
Interest portion of rentals                               263                   --
Preferred dividends                                     2,625                2,625
                                                   ----------           ----------
Fixed charges and preferred stock
  dividend requirements                               108,039               50,349
Earnings to fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividend requirements                            1.86                 2.16
                                                   ----------           ----------
                                                   ----------           ----------

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 324th District Court of Tarrant County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on May 20,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

C.H. v. J.H.

Case Number: 07-15-00130-CV Trial Court Number: 324-549526-14

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated May 20, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on August 10, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
**Exhibit
        32.2**
  ***Certification
        of Chief Financial Officer***
  
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 SECTIONS
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
        U.S.C. 1350)
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  
 3)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                  and
 4)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 Dated:
        May 7, 2007
 
 By /s/
        John Benson .
 John
        Benson, Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies,
        Inc.
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
        separate disclosure document.