alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 24, 2011

|Filer                    | Filing Type        | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------ | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|1ST UNITED BANCORP, INC. | * 3A5* 18C* Branch | 1st United Bancorp (Bancorp), Boca Raton, Florida, to merge with Anderen Financial, Inc., and thereby directly acquire its subsidiary, Anderen Bank (Bank), both of Palm Harbor, Florida. In addition, Bancorp's subsidiary, 1st United Bank, Boca Raton, Florida, will merge with Bank. | Newspaper:01/09/2012Federal Register:01/06/2012
|Newspaper:               | 01/09/2012        
|Federal Register:        | 01/06/2012        

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 28, 2012

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|WESTERN BANK      | * Branch       | Western Bank, Lordsburg, New Mexico, to establish a branch at 1 Main Street, Bisbee, Arizona 85603. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

#### § 107.227 Judicial review.

A party to a proceeding under § 107.215(a) may seek review of a determination of the Chief Counsel by filing a petition, within 60 days after the determination becomes final, in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia or in the Court of Appeals for the United States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal place of business.

[71 FR 30068, May 25, 2006]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 16, 1995 (81), Para 81.5 Corrections Calendar]
[Page 1010]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.81.5  corrections calendar

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-144) the resolution (H. Res. 168) amending clause 4 of rule XIII 
of the Rules of the House to abolish the Consent Calendar and to 
establish in its place a Corrections Calendar.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


         Information relating to certain of the subsidiaries of Banknorth Group,
Inc. as of December 31, 2000 is set forth below. All of the indicated
subsidiaries are directly or indirectly wholly-owned by Banknorth Group, Inc.


    Direct Subsidiaries:

           NAME                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
           ----                                   -----------------------------
    Peoples Heritage Bank, NA                     United States
    Bank of New Hampshire, NA                     United States
    First Massachusetts Bank, NA                  United States
    The Howard Bank, NA                           United States
    Franklin Lamoille Bank, NA                    United States
    First Vermont Bank, NA                        United States
    Evergreen Bank, NA                            United States
    The Stratevest Group, NA                      United States
    Peoples Heritage Capital Trust I              Delaware
    Banknorth Capital Trust I                     Delaware
    North Group Realty, Inc.                      Vermont

    Indirect Subsidiaries:

            NAME                                  JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
            ----                                  -----------------------------

    Heritage Investment Planning
    Group, Inc. (1)(2)                            Maine
    Banknorth Leasing Corp. (1)                   Maine
    Morse Payson & Noyes Insurance (1)(3)         Maine



--------------------------

(1) Subsidiary of Peoples Heritage Bank, NA.
(2) Holds as a subsidiary First Massachusetts Insurance Agency, Inc., a
    Massachusetts corporation.
(3) Holds as a subsidiary Catalano Insurance Agency, Inc. and Arthur A.
    Watson & Co., Inc., a Massachusetts and a Connecticut corporation,
    respectively.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 18 - 00140 - CR

BENTLEY MARK JENKINS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 4 OF TA RRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. C

- 4

- 011060

- 0410880D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Bentley Mark Jenkins appears to attempt to appeal from actions taken eith er in the trial court or the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals regarding his article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus . In the application, he complain s of his 1991 felony conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and associated ten

- y ear sentence. On April 13, 2018, this court notified

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 the parties that we have no jurisdiction over postconviction applications under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure and no authority to review judgments or orders of the Texas Court of Crimi nal Appeals. We warned Appellant that absent a response by May 3, 2018, showing grounds for continuing the appeal, it would be subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. We have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of ju risdiction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 5 (West 2015) (“After conviction the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner.”); Ater v. Eight h Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (holding that the court of appeals infringed on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ’ s exclusive authority to grant habeas relief from a final felony conviction) ; State ex rel . Wilson v. Briggs , 171 Tex. Crim. 479, 482, 351 S.W.2d 892, 894 (1961) (“The Court of Criminal Appeals is the court of last resort in this state in criminal
matters. This being so, no other court of this state has authority to overrule or circumvent its decisions, or disobey its mandates.”); Ex parte Turner , No. 02

- 18

- 00020

- CR, 2018 WL 1755246, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Apr. 12, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).3 P ER CURIAM
PANEL: PITTMAN, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and BIRDWELL, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: June 21, 2018
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1925

For the relief of Thomas McDermott, Sr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1995

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

For the relief of Thomas McDermott, Sr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF PURCHASE.

4 Thomas McDermott, Senior, of Oshkosh, Wisconsin,

5 is authorized to purchase, at fair market value, the real

6 property of the United States in Grant County, New Mex7 ico, to which Mr. McDermott’s mineral patent application

8 applies and the Bureau of Land Management of the De9 partment of the Interior is directed to enter into negotia10 tions with Mr. McDermott for the purchase of such real

11 property. Such application is Mr. McDermott’s application

12 filed under the Act of May 10, 1872 (30 U.S.C. 22 et
2

•HR 1925 IH

1 seq.) (referred to as the ‘‘1872 Mining Law’’) identified

2 as mineral patent application NMNM 78359. Such pur3 chase shall be made not later than 6 months after the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>



                                                               Exhibit 99.2(ii)


Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                      CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2000-S2

Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated February
1, 2000 between Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation, Servicer and Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation hereby provides the following Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof.

/s/ Lucy P. Gambino                     /s/ Susan Christman
-------------------------               -----------------------------------
Lucy P. Gambino                         Susan Christman
Vice President                          Assistant Treasurer





Certified March 13, 2001



342
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 106.45 Tracking rulemaking actions. The following identifying numbers allow you to track PHMSA's rulemaking activities: ( a ) *Docket number.* We assign an identifying number, called a docket number, to each rulemaking proceeding. Each rulemaking document that PHMSA issues in a particular rulemaking proceeding will display the same docket number. This number allows you to do the following: ( 1 ) Associate related documents that appear in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) Search the DOT Docket Management System (“DMS”) for information on particular rulemaking proceedings—including notices of proposed rulemaking, public comments, petitions for rulemaking, appeals, records of additional rulemaking proceedings and final rules. There are two ways you can search the DMS: ( i ) Visit the public docket room and review and copy any docketed materials during regular business hours. The DOT Docket Management System is located at the U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( ii ) View and download docketed materials through the Internet at *http://www.regulations.gov .*
( b ) *Regulation identifier number.* The Department of Transportation publishes a semiannual agenda of all current and projected Department of Transportation rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions. This semiannual agenda appears in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations that is published in the Federal Register in April and October of each year. The semiannual agenda tells the public about the Department's—including PHMSA's—regulatory activities. The Department assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each individual rulemaking proceeding in the semiannual agenda. This number appears on all rulemaking documents published in the Federal Register and makes it easy for you to track those rulemaking proceedings in both the Federal Register and the semiannual regulatory agenda itself, as well as to locate all documents in the Docket Management System pertaining to a particular rulemaking.
[70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 55682, Oct. 1, 2007]
§ 109.9 Transportation for examination and analysis. ( a ) An agent may direct a package to be transported to a facility for examination and analysis when the agent determines that: ( 1 ) Further examination of the package is necessary to evaluate whether the package conforms to subchapter C of this chapter;
( 2 ) Conflicting information concerning the package exists; or
( 3 ) Additional investigation is not possible on the immediate premises.
( b ) In the event of a determination in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, an agent may: ( 1 ) Direct the offeror of the package, or other person responsible for the package, to have the package transported to a facility where the material may be examined and analyzed;
( 2 ) Direct the packaging manufacturer or tester of the packaging to have the package transported to a facility where the packaging may be tested in accordance with the HMR; or
( 3 ) Direct the carrier to transport the package to a facility capable of conducting such examination and analysis.
( c ) The 48-hour removal period provided in § 109.7 may be extended in writing by the Administrator pending the conclusion of examination and analysis under this section.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.13 H. Res. 169--Unfinished Business]
[Page 1017]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.13  h. res. 169--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the unfinished business to be the question on ordering the 
previous question on the resolution (H. Res. 169) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 1854) making appropriations for the 
Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and 
for other purposes.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HEFLEY, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. BEILENSON demanded a recorded vote on ordering the previous 
question on said resolution, which demand was supported by one-fifth of 
a quorum, so a recorded vote was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

232

affirmative

Nays

196
```
§ 1253.20 Other records. Each such organization subject to sections 5a or 5b shall maintain: ( a ) ( 1 ) A file for each proposal relating to rates, fares, classifications, divisions, allowances, or charges (including charges between carriers and compensation paid or received for the use of facilities and equipment), or rules and regulations pertaining thereto, which shall contain the complete proposal, all procedural documents issued, protests, memoranda, amendments, reports, etc., submitted and any other correspondence respecting the matter proposed. Also reports or minutes of all proceedings at any oral, committee or public hearing held thereon and the determination relating thereto;
( 2 ) a file covering each petition or protest filed by the organization against tariff publications of a member for suspension of rates or other matters published for such member carrier;
( 3 ) a file covering each instruction or request for publication by independent action.
( b ) All accounts and other records covered by this part shall be filed in such manner as to be readily accessible for examination by representatives of the Board.
( c ) All rate bureaus are required to: ( 1 ) Advise the Board of any change in legal address by notifying the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of Proceedings; and
( 2 ) Submit information to the Board when requested.
(49 U.S.C. 10706, 11145; 5 U.S.C. 553)
[32 FR 20474, Dec. 20, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 37904, Aug. 27, 1982; 74 FR 52912, Oct. 15, 2009]
98-1363.

#### Reese v. Price.

Erie App. No. E-97-086. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1460, 700 N.E.2d 877. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Resnick, J., not participating.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-QSB


Amendment #1





QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007





Commission File Number: 000-17064





Oasis Online Technologies Corp.


(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)





Minnesota

41-1430130(State of other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)4710 E Falcon Drive Suite 213 Mesa, Arizona 85215(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)








(480) 634-5840(Issuer's telephone number)








Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  X  No___





Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes  ___  No X





As of January 29, 2008, the Registrant had 13,470,854 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding.





Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes__ No X










EXPLANATORY NOTE





The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2008 (the “Form 10-QSB”), is solely to correct the indication that the registrant is a shell company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which was indicted in the original filing in error.  No other changes have been made to the Form 10-QSB.  This Amendment No.1 continues to speak as of the original filing date and does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date, and does not modify or update in any way disclosures made in the original Form 10-QSB filing.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Eric ClickBy:
Eric ClickIts:
Director

Secretary

Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Operating Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer