alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS
I, Michael Friess, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Implant Technologies,
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



(Date)                          February 13, 2007


BY(Signature)                   /s/ Michael Friess
(Name and Title)                Michael Friess
                                President, Chief Executive Officer




                                       11
Release dates | 
    Full version (24 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending April 3, 2010

---





## Bank Branches, Domestic

|
|
|

## Bank Holding Companies

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## Bank Mergers

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## Change in Bank Control

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

## Extensions of Time

|
|
|

## 

|
|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1100 

CA 11-00363 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF 

ROCHESTER FOR AN “INSPECTION WARRANT” TO INSPECT 

187 CLIFTON STREET, CITY OF ROCHESTER, COUNTY OF 

MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK. 

------------------------------------------------ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 

FLORINE NELSON AND WALTER NELSON, APPELLANTS, 

 

V

CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

 

DAVIDSON FINK LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. BURGER OF COUNSEL), FOR

APPELLANTS.

JEFFREY EICHNER, ACTING CORPORATION COUNSEL, ROCHESTER (IGOR SHUKOFF

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

DIBBLE & MILLER, P.C., ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR

NEW YORK STATE COALITION OF PROPERTY OWNERS & BUSINESSES, INC., AMICUS

CURIAE. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas

A. Stander, J.), entered February 18, 2011. The order authorized the

inspection of certain real property. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of City of Rochester (Cermak)

([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 23, 2011]).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.22 Permission to File Report]
[Page 700]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.22  permission to file report

  On motion of Mr. EHLERS, by unanimous consent, the Committee on BUDGET 
was granted permission until midnight tonight to file a report (Rept. 
No. 104-120) on the concurrent resolution setting forth the 
congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal years, 
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending March 24, 2012

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|COOPER INVESTMENTS, INC | * 3A1         | Cooper Investments, Inc., Farmington, Missouri, to become a bank holding company through the retention of at least 25 percent of the voting shares of First State Bancshares, Inc., Farmington, Missouri, and thereby indirectly control First State Community Bank, Farmington, Missouri. | Newspaper:04/23/2012Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:              | 04/23/2012   
|Federal Register:       | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location              | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CASS CMRL BK, BRIDGETON, MISSOURI   | 177751 | 11/28/2011 | 03/16/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FARMERS B&TC, BLYTHEVILLE, ARKANSAS | 33147  | 12/06/2010 | 03/15/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1549.101 Acceptance, screening, and transfer of cargo. ( a ) *Preventing or deterring the carriage of any explosive or incendiary.* Each certified cargo screening facility must use the facilities, equipment, and procedures described in its security program to prevent or deter the carriage onboard an aircraft of any unauthorized explosives, incendiaries, and other destructive substances or items in cargo onboard an aircraft, as provided in the facility's security program.
( b ) *Screening and inspection of cargo.* Each certified cargo screening facility must ensure that cargo is screened and inspected for any unauthorized explosive, incendiary, and other destructive substance or item as provided in the facility's security program before it is tendered to another certified cargo screening facility, an aircraft operator with a full program under part 1544, a foreign air carrier operating under §§ 1546.101(a) or (b), or an indirect air carrier operating under § 1548.5 for transport on a passenger aircraft. Cargo that the facility represents as screened, must be screened in accordance with this part.
( c ) *Refusal to transport.* Each certified cargo screening facility must refuse to offer to another certified cargo screening facility, an aircraft operator with a full program under part 1544, a foreign air carrier operating under §§ 1546.101(a) or (b), or an indirect air carrier operating under § 1548.5 for transport on a passenger aircraft any cargo, if the shipper does not consent to a search or inspection of that cargo in accordance with this part, or parts 1544, 1546, or 1548 of this chapter.
( d ) *Chain of custody.* Each certified cargo screening facility must protect the cargo from unauthorized access from the time it is screened until the time it is tendered to another certified cargo screening facility as approved by TSA, an indirect air carrier under 49 CFR part 1548, an aircraft operator under part 1544, or a foreign air carrier under part 1546.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00347-CV

In re Erasmo Garcia

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Erasmo Garcia filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

temporary relief pending disposition of his mandamus petition. We granted a temporary stay and

requested a response from real parties in interest. Having reviewed the petition, record, and filings

by relator and real parties in interest, we dissolve our temporary stay and deny the petition for writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Filed: June 17, 2014
§ 196.50-1 Master or person in charge responsible. ( a ) It shall be the duty of the master or other person in charge of the vessel to see that all of the provisions of the certificate of inspection are strictly adhered to. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as limiting the master or other person in charge of the vessel, at his own responsibility, from diverting from the route prescribed in the certificate of inspection or taking such other steps as he deems necessary and prudent to assist vessels in distress or for other similar emergencies.
#### Rensselaer N. Patterson and others, *Respondents, v.*Silas J. Moore, and others, *Appellants*.

First order reversed, with ten dollars costs of printing and disbursement, and motion denied, ■ with ten dollars costs; second order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1822 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1822

 To provide that Federal and State courts and agencies may not require 
that legal citations in which copyright subsists be the only acceptable 
    submission to such courts and agencies where alternatives exist.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1995

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that Federal and State courts and agencies may not require 
that legal citations in which copyright subsists be the only acceptable 
    submission to such courts and agencies where alternatives exist.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEGAL CITATION REQUIREMENTS.

    No State or Federal court, agency, or department, or other 
authority of a State or the Federal Government may require that, in 
documents submitted to such court, agency, department, or authority, a 
system of citation to State or Federal laws, regulations, judicial 
opinions, or administrative decisions be used in which copyright 
subsists, unless no other system of citation to such laws, regulations, 
opinions, or decisions exists.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``State'' means each of the several 
States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or 
possession of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1511.1 Applicability and purpose. ( a ) This part prescribes the imposition of a fee on air carriers and foreign air carriers in air transportation to pay for the costs of providing U.S. civil aviation security services as described in 49 U.S.C. 44940.
( b ) For purposes of this part, the fee will be described as the “Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee.”
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 25, 2022 No. 04-22-00396-CR Juan DE LOS SANTOS-SALAS ,

Appellant
v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR0415 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On June 28, 2022, the trial court granted Ms. Monica E. Guerrero’s motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal. On June 29, 2022, appellant filed in this court a pro se Motion for Appointment of Counsel on Appeal. The trial court has appointed Ms. Nancy Knox Bierman as appellant’s appellate counsel. Therefore, we DENY appellant’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel on Appeal as moot.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### § 1544.401 Applicability of this subpart.

This subpart applies when the aircraft operator is conducting inspections as provided in § 1544.207.

[74 FR 47704, Sept. 16, 2009]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 7, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 27, 1995 (87), Para 87.12 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1043]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.87.12  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. GILMAN:

       Page 8, line 16, strike ``$669,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$645,000,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

202

negative

Nays

218
```
| | EXHIBIT 32.1 | 
| | ------------ | 

|
|

| | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350 | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

|I, David Loflin, President of Diamond I, Inc. (the â€œCompanyâ€), hereby
      certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
      ended December 31, 2004, and filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the â€œReportâ€), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|

|Dated: April 25, 2005. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN | 
|---------------------- | ---------------- | 

| | David Loflin, President (principal executive officer) | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------- |
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.18 Senate Enrolled Bill Signed]
[Page 419]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.18  senate enrolled bill signed

  The SPEAKER announced his signature to an enrolled bill of the Senate 
of the following title:

       S. 1. An Act to curb the practice of imposing unfunded 
     Federal mandates on States and local governments; to 
     strengthen the partnership between the Federal Government and 
     State, local and tribal governments; to end the imposition, 
     in the absence of full consideration by Congress, of Federal 
     mandates on State, local, and tribal governments without 
     adequate funding, in a manner that may displace other 
     essential governmental priorities; and to ensure that the 
     Federal Government pays the costs incurred by those 
     governments in complying with certain requirements under 
     Federal statutes and regulations, and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               42890
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     12120985
<ALLOWANCES>                                       591,596
<INVENTORY>                                        5681978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2176895
<PP&E>                                            21162744
<DEPRECIATION>                                   153620516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    50760242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            155024666
<BONDS>                                           15366047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             19774262
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                        43527636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      49882849
<SALES>                                          155024666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                             66686104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  715938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   14724585
<INCOME-TAX>                                       5638940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                8507640
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       8507640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.65
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William C. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                         /s/ William C. Brown
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         William C. Brown
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         November 4, 2002