alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1731
MICHAEL PACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01703-RDB) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 15, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Pack, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Pack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Pack v. Baltimore Police Dep’t , No. 1:07-cv-01703-RDB (D. Md. July 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
98-2022.

#### State ex rel. Manos v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections.

Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 562, 701 N.E.2d 371. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

MARCH 29, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED102182 MICHAEL M. PENNELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, 

RES

2. ED102481 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RALPH H. CATO, APP

3. ED102856 MARIO HAWKINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

4. ED102904 M.C., APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES

5. ED102908 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DERRICK BARNES, APP

6. ED102979 JOHN DONLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

7. ED103205 EDMUND VOGEL, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES
0

0 5 10 15 KILOMETERS

5 10 15 MILES Modified from Hansen

EXPLANATION and others (1978)

LARAMIE-FOX HILLS AQUIFER

ARAPAHOE AQUIFER

DENVER AQUIFER

DAWSON AQUIFER

39 

40 

105 104 

LARIMER

MORGAN

BOULDER

WELD

WASHINGTON

LINCOLN

JEFFERSON

ADAMS

ARAPAHOE

ELBERT

EL PASO

DOUGLAS

Loveland

Greeley

Fort Morgan

Boulder

Golden DENVER

Littleton

Parker

Strasburg

Elizabeth

Sedalia

Kiowa

Elbert

Castle

Rock

Colorado

Springs

Fountain

. Limon

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. .

.

Figure 2 Map showing outcrop pattern of the principal aquifers of the Denver Basin, Colorado

Fount ain

Creek

Monument

Cr

Black

Squ irrel

Creek

South

Platte River

Boulder Creek

Big Thompson River Riverside

Reservoir

Empire

Reservoir

Jackson

Reservoir

South

Platte

River

Kiowa

Creek

Bijou Creek

Muddy Creek

Badger Creek

Big

Sandy

Cr

E

Bijou Cr e e k

Cherry Creek

Cherry Creek

Reservoir

Plum

Cr

W

Plum

Creek Palmer

Lake
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 23

- 2020

___________ IN RE: ATIF B. MALIK ,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to D.C. Civil Action No. 3

- 22

- cv
- 00059)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

July 11, 2023 Before: KRAUSE, PORTER, and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed July 17, 2023 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Atif Malik petitions for a writ of mandamus. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition. In April 2022, Malik, a federal prisoner, filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the Bureau of Prison’s (BOP) calculation of his earned time credits. On June 8, 2023, Malik filed this mandamus petition requesting that we order the Distr ict

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

Court to order the BOP to “take action on the issuance of the remaining portion of Malik’s earned time credits petition.” Pet. at 6. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. Malik must show that he lacks adequate
alternative means to obtain the relief h e seeks , and he carries the burden of showing that his right to relief is clear and undisputable. See Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for S. Dist. of
Ia. , 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989). A petition for a writ of mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal. See In r e Briscoe , 448 F.3d 201, 212 (3d Cir. 2006)

. After Malik filed this petition, the District Court dismissed Malik’s § 2241 petition as moot, noting that the BOP had calculated his earned time credit. Thus, to the extent
that Malik asked us to direct the D istrict Court to rule on his petition, we can no longer grant the requested relief. See generally Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that . . . prevent a court f

rom being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). To the extent that Malik requests that we order the District Court to order the BOP to give him additional earned time credit, he is not entitled to such relief
via manda mus as he has the alternate remedy of appealing the District Court’s dismissal of his § 2241 petition. For the above reasons, we will deny the mandamus petition. 1

1 Malik improperly titles his mandamus petition as being filed pursuant to the Crime Victims’ Rights Act , 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). S ubse ction (d)(3) requires that we decide mandamus petitions filed under § 3771 within 72 hours and throughout Malik’s petition, he stresses that it is “time sensitive

. ” However, b esides citing to the Crime Victim’s Rights’ Act in the title, he does not attemp t to argue that he is a crime victim or that his petition in any way falls within § 3771.
#### § 96.25-1 When required.

All mechanically propelled vessels of 1,600 gross tons and over in ocean or coastwise service must be fitted with a marine radar system for surface navigation. Facilities for plotting radar readings must be provided on the bridge.

[CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC Y WASHINGTON , D
. C
. 20460

Ms. Donna B. Hill Southern Company 600 18L h Street North Mail Bin 14N-8195 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Dear Ms. Hill: 

## JUl 3 1 2 013

OFF ICE OF WATE R

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received your request for plant-specific information, including estimated compli ance costs and pollutant removals, related to the proposed revisions to the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819). In response to your request, please find enclosed a disc containing one file and six attachments fo r each plant for which costs/removals are being provided. The file and attachments present the input values and the costs and pollutant removals for the requested plants, as well as additional information regarding EPA's estimation of these values. The EPA is providing costs and pollutant removals for the following plants: • Barry (0765 1); • Gadsden (04495); • EC Gaston (00928); • Gorgas (04599); • Greene County (06368) ; • James H. Miller Jr (01493); • Bowen (02244); • Harlee Branch (05762); • Hammond (06634); • Edwin I Hatch (08379) ; • Kraft (02966); • Jack McDonough (03793); • Mcintosh (07629): • McManus (04617): 

### • Mitchell (00635); • Scherer (0 8179);

Internet Ad dres s (U RL) • http /lwww e p a g ov Recycled/ Recy c lable • Pnnted w 1th Vegetab l e 011 Based I nks on 100% Postcon sumer P rocess Chlori ne Free Recycled Pa pe r• Vogtle (07527); • Wansley (05043); • Yates (06370) ; • Crist (04702); • Scholz (01366); • Lansing Smith (05620); • Victor J. Daniel Jr (02482); • Jack Watson (00654); • Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center (06453); and • Rowan (08451). The information provided in the enclosed disc may contain information that was claimed by your company's plants as confidential business information (CBI) in re sponse to the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. The EPA is not responsible for the release ofthis CBI if you or others in your company provide these attachments to other parties. If you have any questions regarding these estima te s, please contact me at (202) 566-1755 or alicea.jezebele @ epa.gov. Thank you for your interest in the steam electric effluent guidelines rulemaking process.

Enclosures
§ 92.20-25 Washrooms and toilet rooms. ( a ) There must be provided at least 1 toilet, 1 washbasin, and 1 shower or bathtub for each 8 members or portion thereof in the crew who do not occupy rooms to which private or semi-private facilities are attached.
( b ) The toilet rooms and washrooms must be located convenient to the sleeping quarters of the crew to which they are allotted but must not open directly into such quarters except when they are provided as private or semi-private facilities.
( c ) All washbasins, showers, and bathtubs shall be equipped with adequate plumbing, including hot and cold running water. All toilets must be installed with adequate plumbing for flushing.
( d ) At least 1 washbasin must be fitted in each toilet room, except where private or semi-private facilities are provided and washbasins are installed in the sleeping rooms.
( e ) Where more than 1 toilet is located in a space or compartment, each toilet must be separated by partitions.
Fw: RAD Acceptance of Revised HPV 2 Data Adequacy Review for CASRN 

119-61-9 (Bill Gulledge ACC)

Paul Campanella to: John Schaeffer, Marcus Aguilar 03/20/2012 11:13 AM

----- Forwarded by Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US on 03/20/2012 11:12 AM -----

From: David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US

To: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Mark Townsend/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Meena Sonawane/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/20/2012 10:09 AM

Subject: Fw: Revised HPV2 Data Adequacy Review for CASRN 119-61-9

Hi Paul,

We have reviewed our contractor's report and it is acceptable.

Dave

HPV2 Data Adequacy Review CASRN 119-61-9_Revised Final.doc
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  December-31-1997
<CASH>                        366,144
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,422,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         73,016
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    10,349,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  10,422,735
<SALES>                       000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              440,246
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              240,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>              2,892,415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,692,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,692,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,692,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.25)


</TABLE>
-90

 -85 -80 -75

 35

 40

 45

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1995
[CASH]                                          29,176
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   45,111
[ALLOWANCES]                                     (633)
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               102,809
[PP&E]                                         452,396
[DEPRECIATION]                               (158,565)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 417,625
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           56,999
[BONDS]                                        133,648
[COMMON]                                        60,376
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                     117,620
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   417,625
[SALES]                                         61,436
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                61,436
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   60,268
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               2,363
[INCOME-PRETAX]                               (10,409)
[INCOME-TAX]                                   (3,736)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (6,673)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (6,673)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.11)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.11)
</TABLE>
# BY HAND

Document Control Office Office of Pollution Prevention andToxics Room6428 U .S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave ., N .W . Washington, DC 20460 P.O . Box 331, Miiiwood, VA 22646 (540) 837-1602



# December 17, 2009

Re: Testing Consent Order for Ethylene Dichloride; InterimReport (Docket No . OPPT-2003-0010

) Dear Sirs: 

# , C`~ C3



# Enclosed in sextuplicate is the six-month interimreport required under the Enforceable Consent Agreement for Ethylene Dichloride, 68 Fed. Reg. 33125 (June 3, 2003) (the "ECA"), describing the status oftesting conducted or to be conducted under the ECA . Please do not hesitate to contact me if there is any question about this status report. 

# Sincerely,

Enclosures cc: John E. Schaeffer W . Caffey Norman, Esq.

5063006 

# M--' 04~ lwttj Peter E. Voytek, Ph.D

. Manager 

# ~IfIIIVhNIIYIIVV~hlllll,~H~Mllill,~8n$ql

CONTAINS NOCBI 

# -3a 33L'Y0 0 N 

### m a E m u m 

## c w c 

### E n E y U :. T O! C _7 C C c ~ U m?? o y .i .Z, w h g .c Lo W ~ m ~ N tx'o MRt $ 0~0 c n ~ v C OOO O ~ O y '( 1~0 O 7 V .

.0 . 5
~C N ~ `p N _p ~ y ~ C `p ~ N

~ ~ O ~ c C u a ° > O 0 c F ~ o ° o .o O W 

## C, '8

C C4 x a_+ a_ _ y

"~ V O

tj F- 'a :3 ~ N e c ~ V ~ C (/) o > U i+ ma 5r'~ i° a Q oo ~ .o W ~A E c ~o. ~ 0 ° M ~ E ~ 23 ~ j o > O G ~m ~¢`~e o$~a~' o~' w L ~ m U W ~ M Y O W

`m N ?,` C Z 0 C ~ ~(p N 'j N a ~ K ~ ~ ~ ~ C O V ~ Y `~mf G) y ~ LL a wD ~ " N Q t O S '- O 'C O L w N U N G7 .V- O 7 m 0 7 N = d ~ C

.C ~ ° 3U=2 a F u~+ cv : :~ y 

### 0 C _o a w a f- A U w c ° 

### 0 '~ r) o F ` Lo # 

# N ~

. cel o 'x p 

### 0fo CL w
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

As Adopted Pursuant to

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly****Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners XI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   |      /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit
      23.2**










**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**













We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-22859, 333-10783, 333-10587 and 333-35769 of Dynex Capital, Inc. on Form
      S-3
      and Registration Statement No. 333-32663 of Dynex Capital, Inc. on Form S-8
      of
      our report dated April 7, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of
      Dynex Capital, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2006.








**DELOITTE
      & TOUCHE LLP**





Princeton,
      New Jersey


April
      2,
      2007
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, April 4, 1995 (55), Para 55.12 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1271]
[Pages 529-530]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.55.12  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1271

  Mr. McINNIS, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 125):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 1271) to provide protection for family 
     privacy. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 
     with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
     not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
     chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

[[Page 530]]

     on Government Reform and Oversight. After general debate the 
     bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
     rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
     for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
     amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
     Committee on Government Reform and Oversight now printed in 
     the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the 
     nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. At the 
     conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
     Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
     such amendments as may have been adopted. Any member may 
     demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted 
     in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
     amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
     question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
     amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
     motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
     instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. McINNIS, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said resolution?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNNING, announced that the yeas had it.
  Mr. McINNIS objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

423

When there appeared

Nays

1
```
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: March 26, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Elyse Steiner, OAQPS

SUBJECT: Meeting with C3 Energy to discuss the Clean Power Plan

SUMMARY

Phone call with C3 Energy to discuss the Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on 

June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Ron Jenks, C3 Energy

Peter Tsirigotis, EPA

Bill Lamason, EPA

Stacey Angel, EPA

Elyse Steiner, EPA
#### § 67.41 Governmental entity.

A governmental entity is a citizen for the purpose of obtaining a vessel document if it is an entity of the Federal Government of the United States or of the government of a State as defined in § 67.3.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 17, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|HEARTLAND BANK    | Premises       | Request by Heartland Bank, Gahanna, OH for permission to exceed its limit of investment in premises pursuant to Section 24A of the Federal Reserve Act. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 90.27-1 Lifesaving appliances and arrangements.

All lifesaving appliances and arrangements must be in accordance with subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25288, May 20, 1996]