alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

FIRST FARMERS ANDMERCHANTS CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterlyreport of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 
| Date   | November 10, 2008                                 |   |   | /s/ T. Randy Stevens |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   |   T.  Randy Stevens, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| Date   | November 10, 2008                                                                                                                                       |   |   | /s/ Patricia P. Bearden |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   Patricia  P. Bearden, Assistant Treasurer (principal financial              officer) |

 

----
Opinion issued February 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00151-CV

———————————

ELENA MARKOVSKY, Appellant

V.

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-64295

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 9, 2015, appellant filed Appellant Elena Markovsky’s Motion 

to Dismiss Appeal in which she states that she no longer wishes to pursue this 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). No opinion has issued and the certificate of 
2

conference in the motion indicates appellee is not opposed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.2(a); 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 15, 1995 (45), Para 45.21 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 389-390]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.45.21  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. OBEY:

       At the end of the bill, add the following new title:

                  TITLE IV--DEFICIT REDUCTION LOCKBOX

                      deficit reduction trust fund

       Sec. 4001. (a) Establishment.--There is established in the 
     Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the 
     ``Deficit Reduction Trust Fund'' (in this title referred to 
     as the ``Fund'').
       (b) Contents.--The Fund shall consist only of amounts 
     transferred to the Fund under subsection (c).
       (c) Transfers of Moneys to Fund.--For each of the fiscal 
     years 1995 through 1998, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     transfer to the Fund amounts equivalent to the net deficit 
     reduction achieved during such fiscal year as a result of the 
     provisions of this Act.
       (d) Use of Moneys in Fund.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
     amounts in the Fund shall not be available, in any fiscal 
     year, for appropriation, obligation, expenditure, or 
     transfer.
       (2) Use of amounts for reduction of public debt.--The 
     Secretary of the Treasury shall use the amounts in the Fund 
     to redeem, or buy before maturity, obligations of the Federal 
     Government that are included in the public debt. Any 
     obligation of the Federal Government that is paid, redeemed, 
     or bought with money from the Fund shall be canceled and 
     retired and may not be reissued.

         downward adjustments in discretionary spending limits

       Sec. 4002. (a) In general.--Upon the enactment of this Act, 
     the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 
     make downward adjustments in the discretionary spending 
     limits (new budget authority and outlays) specified in 
     section 601(a)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 for 
     each of the fiscal years 1996 through 1998 by the aggregate 
     amount of estimated reductions in new budget authority and 
     outlays for discretionary programs resulting from the 
     provisions this Act (other than emergency appropriations) for 
     such fiscal year, as calculated by the Director.
       (b) Outyear Treatment of Rescissions.--For discretionary 
     programs for which this Act rescinds budget authority for 
     specific fiscal years, the Director of the Office of 
     Management and Budget shall include in the aggregate amount 
     of the downward adjustments under subsection (a) amounts 
     reflecting budget authority reductions for the succeeding 
     fiscal years through 1998, calculated by inflating the amount 
     of the rescission using the baseline procedures identified in 
     section 257 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
     Control Act of 1985.

[[Page 390]]

It was decided in the

Yeas

418

affirmative

Nays

5
```
§ 76.15-30 Alarms. ( a ) Spaces which are protected by a carbon dioxide extinguishing system and are normally accessible to persons on board while the vessel is being navigated, other than paint and lamp lockers and similar small spaces, shall be fitted with an approved audible alarm in such spaces which will be automatically sounded when the carbon dioxide is admitted to the space. The alarm shall be conspicuously and centrally located and shall be marked as required by § 78.47-9 of this subchapter. For systems installed on or after July 1, 1957, alarms will be mandatory only for systems required to be fitted with a delayed discharge. Such alarms shall be so arranged as to sound during the 20 second delay period prior to the discharge of carbon dioxide into the space, and the alarm shall depend on no source of power other than the carbon dioxide.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 62.20-3 Plans for information. ( a ) One copy of the following plans must be submitted to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, for use in the evaluation of automated systems provided to replace specific personnel or to reduce overall crew requirements: ( 1 ) Proposed manning, crew organization and utilization, including routine maintenance, all operational evolutions, and emergencies.
( 2 ) A planned maintenance program for all vital systems.
( b ) One copy of a qualitative failure analysis must be submitted in accordance with § 50.20-5 of this subchapter for the following: ( 1 ) Propulsion controls.
( 2 ) Microprocessor-based system hardware.
( 3 ) Safety controls.
( 4 ) Automated electric power management.
( 5 ) Automation required to be independent that is not physically separate.
( 6 ) Any other automation that, in the judgment of the Commandant, potentially constitutes a safety hazard to the vessel or personnel in case of failure.
Note 1 to paragraph ( b
):
The qualitative failure analysis is intended to assist in evaluating the safety and reliability of the design. It should be conducted to a level of detail necessary to demonstrate compliance with applicable requirements and should follow standard qualitative analysis procedures. Assumptions, operating conditions considered, failures considered, cause and effect relationships, how failures are detected by the crew, alternatives available to the crew, and possible design verification tests necessary should be included. Questions regarding failure analysis should be referred to the Marine Safety Center at an early stage of design.
[CGD 81-030, 53 FR 17838, May 18, 1988, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58280, Sept. 29, 2014]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 5, 2011

----

Testimony and Statements            Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) -- statement by William R. Nelson, Deputy Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, before the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program on the establishment and operation of the TALF, the effects of the program, and steps taken to control risk.            -Published, March 4, 2011            Forms            Forms -- final Board review (1) to extend without revision the Annual Daylight Overdraft Capital Report for U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks (FR 2225), International Applications and Prior Notifications under Subparts A and C of Regulation K (FR K-1), International Applications and Prior Notifications under Subpart B of Regulation K (FR K-2), and Application for a Foreign Organization to Acquire a U.S. Bank or Bank Holding Company (FR Y-3F); (2) to extend with revision the Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire, Federal Reserve Consumer Help (FRCH) -- Consumer Survey, and Consumer Online Complaint Form (FR 1379a, b, and c) and Bank Holding Company Application and Notification Forms (FR Y-3, Y-3N, and Y-4); and (3) to implement the Payments Systems Surveys (FR 3054a, b, c, and d).            -Approved, March 4, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Regulation CC (Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks) -- publication for comment of amendments to encourage banks to clear and return checks electronically, add provisions that govern electronic items cleared through the check-collection system, and shorten the "exception" hold periods on deposited funds.            -Approved, March 1, 2011                        Regulations V (Fair Credit Reporting) and B (Equal Credit Opportunity) -- publication for comment of interagency amendments to require disclosure of credit scores and related information to consumers in risk-based pricing notices and adverse action notices if a credit score is used in setting the credit terms or taking adverse action, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Approved, February 28, 2011            Reserve Bank Operations            Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco -- appointment of John C. Williams as president, effective March 1, 2011.            -Approved, February 25, 2011            (A/C)          Enforcement            Bridgeview Bancorp, Inc., Bridgeview, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, March 1, 2011                        Outsource Holdings, Inc., Lubbock, Texas -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.            -Announced, March 3, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
§ 78.37-10 Official log entries. ( a ) In addition to other items required to be entered in the official logbook on every vessel where an official logbook is required, all items relative to the crew and passengers, including the count of passengers carried, and to casualties shall also be entered.
( b ) Except as noted in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, on any vessel where an official logbook is not required, the master shall keep a record of the correct count of all the passengers received and delivered from day to day. This record shall be open to inspection by the Coast Guard at all times. The aggregate number of the passengers carried shall be furnished to the Coast Guard whenever requested. The information shall be available for a period of one year after the date to which the records refer. ( 1 ) The provisions of the paragraph shall not apply to ferry vessels.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16959, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51205, Sept. 30, 1997]
<PAGE>   1
                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints JOSEPH HINES and CLARENCE J. BAUDHUIN, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 1996, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         DATED:     October 8   , 1996



                                                       /s/ PATRICK M. LONERGAN
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       PATRICK M. LONERGAN

STATE OF          ARIZONA           )
                                    )  ss.
County of         Maricopa          )


         On this 8th day of October , 1996, before me, the undersigned Notary
Public, personally appeared PATRICK M. LONERGAN, known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


                                                       /s/ JANICE BACKUS
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Notary Public

My commission expires:


    October 23, 1997


                                   EXHIBIT 24D
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 106.40 Direct final rule. A direct final rule makes regulatory changes and states that the regulatory changes will take effect on a specified date unless PHMSA receives an adverse comment within the comment period—generally 60 days after the direct final rule is published in the Federal Register. ( a ) *Actions taken by direct final rule.* We may use direct final rulemaking procedures to issue rules that do any of the following: ( 1 ) Make minor substantive changes to regulations.
( 2 ) Incorporate by reference the latest edition of technical or industry standards.
( 3 ) Extend compliance dates.
( 4 ) Make noncontroversial changes to regulations. We must determine and publish a finding that use of direct final rulemaking, in this situation, is in the public interest and unlikely to result in adverse comment.
( b ) *Adverse comment.* An adverse comment explains why a rule would be inappropriate, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. It may challenge the rule's underlying premise or approach. Under the direct final rule process, we do not consider the following types of comments to be adverse: ( 1 ) A comment recommending another rule change, in addition to the change in the direct final rule at issue, unless the commenter states why the direct final rule would be ineffective without the change.
( 2 ) A frivolous or irrelevant comment.
( c ) *Confirmation of effective date.* We will publish a confirmation document in the Federal Register, generally within 15 days after the comment period closes, if we have not received an adverse comment. The confirmation document tells the public the effective date of the rule—either the date stated in the direct final rule or at least 30 days after the publication date of the confirmation document, whichever is later.
( d ) *Withdrawing a direct final rule.* ( 1 ) If we receive an adverse comment, we will either publish a document withdrawing the direct final rule before it becomes effective and may issue an NPRM, or proceed by any other means permitted under the Administrative Procedure Act.
( 2 ) If we withdraw a direct final rule because of an adverse comment, we may incorporate the adverse comment into a later direct final rule or may publish a notice of proposed rulemaking.
( e ) *Appeal.* You may appeal PHMSA's issuance of a direct final rule (see § 106.115) only if you have previously filed written comments (see § 106.60) to the direct final rule.
[67 FR 42954, June 25, 2002, as amended 84 FR 71733, Dec. 27, 2019; 86 FR 17295, Apr. 2, 2021]
§ 1001.1 Records available from the Board. ( a ) The following specific files and records in the custody of the Records Officer of the Surface Transportation Board are available to the public and may be inspected at the Board's office upon reasonable request during business hours (between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday): ( 1 ) Copies of tariffs and railroad transportation contract summaries filed with the Board pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 13702(b) and 10709(d), respectively.
( 2 ) Annual and other periodic reports filed with the Board pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11145.
( 3 ) All docket files, which include documents of record in a proceeding.
( 4 ) File and index of instruments or documents recorded pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11301.
( 5 ) Surface Transportation Board Administrative Issuances.
( b ) The following records, so-called “reading room” documents, are available for inspection and copying at the Board's office: ( 1 ) Final decisions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of cases;
( 2 ) Those statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by the agency and are not published in the Federal Register;
( 3 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public; and
( 4 ) Copies of all records, regardless of form or format, that have been released to any person under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) and that, because of the nature of their subject matter, the agency determines have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records.
( c ) The Board maintains, and makes available for inspection and copying, indexes of the documents described in paragraph (b) of this section. Final decisions are indexed in the “Surface Transportation Board Daily Releases”, which is issued by the Board every working day. This document also explains how copies of decisions can be purchased. The remaining documents are indexed as they are made available.
( d ) Documents described in paragraph (b) of this section that were created on and after November 1, 1996, are indexed by service date or date of issuance and are available for viewing and downloading from the Board's Electronic Reading Room at *www.stb.gov ,* the Board's website. Final decisions are maintained in a database that is full text searchable.
[64 FR 47711, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 52902, Oct. 15, 2009; 83 FR 15077, Apr. 9, 2018]
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 

This Amendment is made as of January 1, 2010 by and between Mabtech AB, whose registered office is at Augustendalsvägen 19, SE-131 28,
Nacka Strand, Sweden, hereinafter referred to as “Seller” or “Mabtech” and Oxford Immunotec Limited, whose registered office is at 94C Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4RY, UK, hereinafter referred to as
“Buyer” or “OI”. 
 WHEREAS: 
  

	A.	The parties entered into a manufacturing agreement dated 26th August 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the “Manufacturing Agreement”).


  

	B.	The parties have agreed to extend the term of the Manufacturing Agreement for an additional period. 

 NOW,
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 
  

	1	Definitions 

  

	1.1	The terms defined in the Manufacturing Agreement shall have the same meaning in this Amendment, unless otherwise expressly agreed in this Amendment. 


 

	2	Amendments 

  

	2.1	Clause 2 third paragraph is hereby replaced to read as follows: “All prices are exclusive of VAT. Mabtech shall invoice OI in advance of each shipment of Plates. OI shall pay each invoice not later than 5 business
days in advance of each requested delivery date. Without limiting other remedies available to Mabtech, failure by Buyer to make timely payment hereunder shall entitle Seller to refuse to accept further orders for Plates and to withhold the Plates
ordered as well as to refuse to accept further orders for Antibodies and to withhold Antibodies ordered under the Agreement relative to Antibodies supply entered into between the parties on even date herewith.” 


 

	2.2	Section 17 of the Manufacturing Agreement is hereby replaced with the following wording: 


“This Agreement shall remain in effect through 31st December 2011 provided that
this Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time by giving immediate written notice to the other in the event of: 
  

	 	(i)	a breach of any of its material terms by the other party and such breach not having been remedied within 60 (sixty) days of receiving written notice to do so; 


 

	 	(ii)	the liquidation or insolvency of or the filing of bankruptcy proceedings by the other except as part of a bona fide scheme for reconstruction or amalgamation; 


 

	 	(iii)	either party ceasing to trade.” 









	3	Miscellaneous 

  

	3.1	This Amendment shall constitute an integrated part of the Manufacturing Agreement and all the other provisions not amended in this Amendment shall remain effective. Any and all termination notices submitted by either
party prior to execution of this Amendment shall be void and of no further force and effect. 

  

	3.2	This Amendment shall become effective upon its execution by both parties. 

 This Amendment has been executed in
two (2) copies, of which each party has taken one. 
  

							
	MABTECH AB	  	OXFORD IMMUNOTEC LIMITED
				
	By:	  	/s/ Staffan Paulie	  	By:	  	/s/ Peter Wrighton-Smith
	Name:	  	Staffan Paulie	  	Name:	  	Dr. Peter Wrighton-Smith
	Title:	  	CEO	  	Title:	  	CEO
	Date	  	Feb 6, 2010	  	Date	  	3rd Feb 2010


  
 -2-
#### Richard P. Smith, *Appellant, v.*Gabriel Elias and another, *Respondents.*

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.