UNITED STATES
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


            For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11766


                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
     (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                             95-3788040
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Item 1.     Financial Statements


                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 199
   Receivables and deposits                                                      385
   Restricted escrows                                                            625
   Other assets                                                                  531
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 3,998
      Buildings and related personal property                   33,138
                                                                37,136
      Less accumulated depreciation                            (27,755)        9,381
                                                                            $ 11,121

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                           $ 9
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           318
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                     75
   Other liabilities                                                             235
   Mortgage note payable                                                      32,989

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                             $ (542)
   Limited partners (39,627 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (21,963)      (22,505)
                                                                            $ 11,121


        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                 2004          2003
Revenues:
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>
   Rental income                                                $1,906        $1,873
   Other income                                                    242            84
   Casualty gain (Note C)                                           --             4
      Total revenues                                             2,148         1,961

Expenses:
   Operating                                                       667           640
   General and administrative                                      114           185
   Depreciation                                                    345           542
   Interest                                                        564           580
   Property taxes                                                  276           265
      Total expenses                                             1,966         2,212

Net income (loss)                                                $ 182        $ (251)

Net income (loss) allocated to general partners (1%)              $ 2          $ (3)
Net income (loss) allocated to limited partners (99%)              180          (248)

                                                                 $ 182        $ (251)

Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit                  $ 4.54        $(6.26)

Distributions per limited partnership unit                       $ --         $ 3.36

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                            ANGELES PARTNERS XI
           CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Limited
                                     Partnership     General       Limited
                                        Units        Partners     Partners       Total

<S>                                    <C>             <C>        <C>          <C>
Original capital contributions         40,000          $ 30       $ 40,000     $ 40,030

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2003                   39,627         $ (544)     $(22,143)     $(22,687)

Net income for the three months
   ended March 31, 2004                    --              2           180           182

Partners' deficit at
   March 31, 2004                      39,627         $ (542)     $(21,963)     $(22,505)


        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                               ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                                        March 31,
                                                                   2004           2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                               <C>            <C>
  Net income (loss)                                               $ 182          $ (251)
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                    345            542
     Amortization of loan costs                                        4              4
     Casualty gain                                                    --             (4)
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                        53             61
      Other assets                                                  (173)            92
      Accounts payable                                               (87)            46
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (24)            --
      Other liabilities                                             (160)          (131)
      Due to affiliates                                               29             --
        Net cash provided by operating activities                    169            359

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (117)          (283)
  Insurance proceeds received                                         --              4
        Net cash used in investing activities                       (117)          (279)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (239)          (148)
  Distributions to partners                                           --           (134)
        Net cash used in financing activities                       (239)          (282)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (187)          (202)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                     386            677

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                        $ 199          $ 475

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 560          $ 446
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:
  Property improvements and replacements included in
      accounts payable                                             $ --          $ 365

Included in property  improvements  and  replacements for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003, are approximately  $31,000 and $161,000,  respectively,
of improvements which were included in accounts payable at December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively.


        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                            ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Angeles Partners
XI (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
In  the  opinion  of  Angeles  Realty  Corporation  II  (the  "Managing  General
Partner"),  all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the
three month period ended March 31, 2004, are not  necessarily  indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2004.  For
further  information,   refer  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003.  The  Managing  General  Partner is an
affiliate of Apartment  Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
Partnership  activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain
payments to affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement  of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing  General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross
receipts from the Partnership's  property as compensation for providing property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$108,000  and  $100,000  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner received reimbursement of accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $48,000 and $66,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,  which are included in
general and  administrative  expenses  and  investment  property.  Approximately
$54,000 of these expenses were payable to the Managing  General Partner at March
31, 2004 and are included in due to  affiliates.  Included in these  amounts are
fees related to construction management services provided by an affiliate of the
Managing  General  Partner of  approximately  $7,000 and  $22,000  for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.  The construction management
service  fees are  calculated  based on a  percentage  of current  additions  to
investment property.

The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for a fee equal to 7.5% of "net cash flow
from  operations",  as defined in the Partnership  Agreement,  to be paid to the
Managing General Partner for executive and administrative  management  services.
One half of this fee is to be accrued and not paid  unless the limited  partners
have  received  distributions  equal to a 5%  cumulative  annual return on their
adjusted capital investment as defined in the Partnership Agreement. This return
criteria has not been met. During the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
no fees were earned or paid.  At March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  has accrued
approximately $21,000 of Partnership  management fees,  representing one half of
the fees earned in 2000, 2001 and 2002 which is included in Due to affiliates on
the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet.  This amount will remain accrued
until criteria for payment has been met.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing General Partner.  During 2004, the Partnership anticipates its cost for
insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration will be
approximately  $68,000. The Partnership was charged  approximately  $103,000 for
2003.

Note C - Casualty

During the year ended  December  31,  2002,  a  casualty  gain of  approximately
$17,000 was recorded at Fox Run Apartments.  The casualty gain related to a fire
that  occurred in June 2002.  The gain was a result of the receipt of  insurance
proceeds of approximately  $18,000 offset by the write-off of the net book value
of the destroyed assets totaling approximately $1,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2003,  additional  insurance proceeds of
approximately $4,000 were received and recorded as additional casualty gain.

Note D - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint (the "Heller action")
was filed  against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,
captioned  Heller v.  Insignia  Financial  Group.  On or about  August 6,  2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
at least one round of tender offers to purchase all of the partnership interests
in the Partnerships within one year of final approval,  if it is granted, and to
provide  partners with the independent  appraisals at the time of these tenders.
The proposed  settlement also provided for the limitation of the allowable costs
which  the  Managing   General   Partner  or  its  affiliates  will  charge  the
Partnerships  in connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class
counsel  fees and  costs in this  litigation.  On April  11,  2003,  notice  was
distributed  to  limited   partners   providing  the  details  of  the  proposed
settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.  On January 28, 2004, Objector filed his
opening brief in his pending  appeal.  On April 23, 2004,  the Managing  General
Partner and its  affiliates  filed a response brief in support of the settlement
and the judgment  thereto.  Plaintiffs have also filed a brief in support of the
settlement.  Objector is  scheduled  to file a reply brief no later than May 13,
2004.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the Managing  General
Partner,  was served  with a  Complaint  in the United  States  District  Court,
District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully violated the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance  workers  overtime
for all hours  worked in excess of forty per week.  On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company,  which is also an
affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner.  The  Complaint  is  styled  as a
Collective  Action  under  the FLSA and seeks to  certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  Complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The Defendants have filed an answer to the Amended Complaint denying
the substantive allegations. Discovery is currently underway.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature
arising in the ordinary course of business.

Pursuant to a formal order of investigation received by AIMCO on March 29, 2004,
the  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission is conducting an  investigation  relating to certain  matters.  AIMCO
believes the areas of investigation  include AIMCO's  miscalculated  monthly net
rental  income  figures in third  quarter 2003,  forecasted  guidance,  accounts
payable,  rent concessions,  vendor rebates,  and capitalization of expenses and
payroll.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully.  AIMCO does not believe that the ultimate
outcome  will  have a  material  adverse  effect on its  consolidated  financial
condition or results of  operations  taken as a whole.  Similarly,  the Managing
General Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material
adverse effect on the Partnership's  consolidated financial condition or results
of operations taken as a whole.

Item 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  property consists of one apartment  complex.  The
following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the property for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                     2004         2003

      Fox Run Apartments                           90%          89%
        Plainsboro, New Jersey

The  Partnership's  financial  results  are  dependent  upon a number of factors
including  the  ability  to  attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment
property,  interest  rates on  mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred  to operate the
investment  property,  general economic  conditions and weather.  As part of the
ongoing business plan of the Partnership,  the Managing General Partner monitors
the  rental  market  environment  of  its  investment  property  to  assess  the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
Managing  General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  the Managing  General Partner may use
rental  concessions  and  rental  rate  reductions  to offset  softening  market
conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner
will be able to sustain  such a plan.  Further,  a number of  factors  which are
outside the control of the  Partnership  such as the local economic  climate and
weather can adversely or positively impact the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  recognized net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004
of approximately  $182,000 compared to a net loss of approximately  $251,000 for
the  corresponding  period  in 2003.  The  increase  in net  income is due to an
increase in total  revenues  and a decrease in total  expenses.  The increase in
total revenues is due to increases in rental and other income  partially  offset
by a decrease in casualty gain (as discussed below). Rental income increased due
to  increases  in  occupancy  and the average  rental rate at the  Partnership's
investment property,  partially offset by an increase in bad debt expense. Other
income increased primarily due to increases in utility reimbursements due to the
implementation  of tenant  rebilling  for water and  sewage  charges  during the
second quarter of 2003.

During the year ended  December  31,  2002,  a  casualty  gain of  approximately
$17,000 was recorded at Fox Run Apartments.  The casualty gain related to a fire
that  occurred in June 2002.  The gain was a result of the receipt of  insurance
proceeds of approximately  $18,000 offset by the write-off of the net book value
of the destroyed assets totaling approximately $1,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2003,  additional  insurance proceeds of
approximately $4,000 were received and recorded as additional casualty gain.

The decrease in total expenses is due to decreases in  depreciation  and general
and  administrative  expenses,  partially  offset by an  increase  in  operating
expenses.   Depreciation   expense   decreased  due  to  the  buildings  at  the
Partnership's  investment  property becoming fully  depreciated  during the year
ended  December  31,  2003.  Operating  expenses  increased  due to increases in
property and administrative  expenses partially offset by decreases in insurance
and  maintenance  expenses.  Property  expenses  increased due to an increase in
utility expenses. Administrative expenses increased primarily due to an increase
in legal fees.  Insurance expense decreased due to decreases in hazard and other
insurance  premiums.  Maintenance  expense  decreased  due to  decreases in snow
removal and purchases of maintenance  materials partially offset by increases in
contract services and interior building improvements.

General and administrative  expenses decreased  primarily due to a decrease in a
partnership  level tax based on the number of partners in the partnership.  Also
included in general and  administrative  expenses are costs of services included
as management  reimbursements  to the Managing General Partner allowed under the
Partnership   Agreement,   costs   associated  with  the  quarterly  and  annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the Partnership Agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2004 the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$199,000  compared to  approximately  $475,000 at March 31, 2003.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased  approximately  $187,000  since  December 31, 2003 due to
approximately  $239,000  and $117,000 of cash used in  financing  and  investing
activities,  respectively,  partially offset by  approximately  $169,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of
principal payments on the mortgage encumbering the Partnership's  property. Cash
used  in   investing   activities   consisted  of  property   improvements   and
replacements.   The  Partnership   invests  its  working  capital   reserves  in
interest-bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing  General  Partner
monitors  developments  in the area of legal and  regulatory  compliance  and is
studying  new  federal  laws,  including  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance, including increased legal and audit fees.

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $86,000 of capital improvements at Fox Run Apartments,  primarily
consisting  of  water  heater  and  floor  covering   replacements,   structural
improvements,  and  interior  decoration.  These  improvements  were funded from
operating cash flow. The Partnership  evaluates the capital improvement needs of
the property and currently expects to complete an additional $341,000 in capital
improvements  during the remainder of 2004. The additional capital  improvements
will consist  primarily of structural  improvements,  air conditioning and water
heater unit replacements,  swimming pool upgrades, interior decoration and major
landscaping.  Additional capital  improvements may be considered and will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as the anticipated  cash flow
generated by the property. To the extent that such budgeted capital improvements
are  completed,  the  Partnership's  distributable  cash  flow,  if any,  may be
adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering  Fox Run  Apartments of  approximately  $32,989,000 is
being  amortized over 20 years and matures in December 2021, at which time it is
expected to be fully amortized.

The Partnership  distributed the following amounts during the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     For the three     Per Limited    For the three     Per Limited
                      Months Ended     Partnership     Months Ended     Partnership
                     March 31, 2004       Unit        March 31, 2003        Unit

<S>         <C>           <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>
Refinancing (1)           $ --            $ --            $ 134            $ 3.36

(1)   Refinancing  proceeds are from the December  2001  refinancing  of Fox Run
      Apartments.  Approximately $554,000 remains to be distributed at March 31,
      2004.
</TABLE>

The  Partnership's  cash  available  for  distribution  is reviewed on a monthly
basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves,  the timing of the debt
maturity and refinancing and/or sale of the property.  There can be no assurance
that the  Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after
required capital  improvement  expenditures,  to permit any distributions to its
partners in 2004 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 25,864 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 65.27% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2004. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO  Properties,  L.P, the  operating  partnership  of AIMCO,  either
through  private  purchases  or  tender  offers.  Pursuant  to  the  Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove the Managing General  Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 65.27% of
the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the Partnership.  Although the Managing General
Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the
Managing  General  Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to  AIMCO as its sole
stockholder.  As a  result,  the  duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as
managing general  partner,  to the Partnership and its limited partners may come
into conflict with the duties of the Managing  General  Partner to AIMCO, as its
sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying amount of the property may be impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to, changes in national,  regional and local economic climate; local conditions,
such  as  an  oversupply  of  multifamily  properties;  competition  from  other
available  multifamily  property owners and changes in market rental rates.  Any
adverse  changes in these  factors could cause  impairment of the  Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership  evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an
allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than
30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response to heavy  competition from other similar  complexes in the area. Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint (the "Heller action")
was filed  against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,
captioned  Heller v.  Insignia  Financial  Group.  On or about  August 6,  2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
at least one round of tender offers to purchase all of the partnership interests
in the Partnerships within one year of final approval,  if it is granted, and to
provide  partners with the independent  appraisals at the time of these tenders.
The proposed  settlement also provided for the limitation of the allowable costs
which  the  Managing   General   Partner  or  its  affiliates  will  charge  the
Partnerships  in connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class
counsel  fees and  costs in this  litigation.  On April  11,  2003,  notice  was
distributed  to  limited   partners   providing  the  details  of  the  proposed
settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.  On January 28, 2004, Objector filed his
opening brief in his pending  appeal.  On April 23, 2004,  the Managing  General
Partner and its  affiliates  filed a response brief in support of the settlement
and the judgment  thereto.  Plaintiffs have also filed a brief in support of the
settlement.  Objector is  scheduled  to file a reply brief no later than May 13,
2004.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the Managing  General
Partner,  was served  with a  Complaint  in the United  States  District  Court,
District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully violated the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance  workers  overtime
for all hours  worked in excess of forty per week.  On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company,  which is also an
affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner.  The  Complaint  is  styled  as a
Collective  Action  under  the FLSA and seeks to  certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  Complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The Defendants have filed an answer to the Amended Complaint denying
the substantive allegations. Discovery is currently underway.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

Item 6.     Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3.1, Amended  Agreement of Limited  Partnership  dated
                  February 26, 1982, filed in Form 10-K dated November 30, 1983,
                  incorporated herein by reference.

                  Exhibit 31.1,  Certification  of equivalent of Chief Executive
                  Officer   pursuant   to   Securities    Exchange   Act   Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  Exhibit 31.2,  Certification  of equivalent of Chief Financial
                  Officer   pursuant   to   Securities    Exchange   Act   Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  Exhibit  32.1,  Certification  Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section
                  1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance  with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the  Registrant has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.



                                    ANGELES PARTNERS XI
                                    (A California Limited Partnership)
                                    (Registrant)


                                    By:   Angeles Realty Corporation II
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                          Thomas M. Herzog
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: May 13, 2004



<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners
      XI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior  Vice  President  of  Angeles  Realty
                                    Corporation  II,  equivalent  of  the  chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Thomas M. Herzog, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners
      XI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004

                                    /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Senior Vice  President and Chief  Accounting
                                    Officer of Angeles  Realty  Corporation  II,
                                    equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                    the Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                           As Adopted Pursuant to
               Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners XI
(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha
L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief  executive  officer of the  Partnership,
and Thomas M. Herzog,  as the equivalent of the chief  financial  officer of the
Partnership,  each hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  May 13, 2004


                                           /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Name:  Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Date:  May 13, 2004


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.