alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.31 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1111]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.31  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. OBEY:

       On page 16, line 1, insert ``(less $18,000,000)'', before 
     ``to remain''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

155

negative

Nays

266
```
<PAGE>



                                                              Exhibit 99.2(viii)


Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH  43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                      CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                    MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE 2000-S8

Pursuant to Section 5.25 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated October 1,
2000 between Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, Depositor, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation, Servicer and Citibank, N.A., Trustee, Chase Manhattan
Mortgage Corporation hereby provides the following Officers' Certificate:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of performance under the related Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been made; and

(ii) to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year,
or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, specifying each such default known to such
Servicing Officer and the nature and status thereof,

/s/ Lucy P. Gambino                    /s/ Susan Christman
------------------------               -----------------------------------
Lucy P. Gambino                        Susan Christman
Vice President                         Assistant Treasurer





Certified March 13, 2001



348
#### Josiah H. Burton, Respondent, v. Antoinette W. Sherman, Appellant.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
**Exhibit** **32.1**








**HARLEYSVILLE
      NATIONAL CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Harleysville National Corporation (the “Corporation”)
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gregg J. Wagner,
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Corporation, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  To
      my
      knowledge the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the Report.














/s/
      Gregg J. Wagner


Gregg
      J.
      Wagner


President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Director


Harleysville
      National Corporation





Date:
      August 8, 2006










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Harleysville National Corporation and
      will
      be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.


-38-
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 20, 1995 (83), Para 83.21 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1019]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.83.21  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. ROYCE:

       Page 3, line 3, strike ``$588,243,000'' and insert 
     ``$571,843,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

158

negative

Nays

270
```
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Ziering, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diagnostic Products
    Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
    flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
    report; and

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

   a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
       to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
       its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
       entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
       prepared;

   b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
       the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
       over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
       recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
       of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
       likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
       financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
       operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
       reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
       process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       control over financial reporting.


Dated August 9, 2004

/s/ Michael Ziering

Michael Ziering, Chief Executive Officer
Date: 1JUN2015 Subject: Petition for Sect ion 333 exemption

.
I am requesting a S ection 333 exemption to fly UAS vehicles weighing less than 55lbs at or below 200
feet
, during daytime VFR conditions, within VLOS of the pilot(s) , and at permitted distances from airports or heliports.

As a U.S. Army officer who has sworn an oath to support and defend the constitution of the United
States of America , I find it very troubling when the gover nment we have empowered to protect our freedoms sees fit to unduly restrict individual freedoms to the point where our own backyard is no
l o nger our own, but controlled by the government. The concept that the F AA controls every cubic inch of space above the natural earth is an entirely new one, and it is very far from consistent with the principles that our great nation was founded upon

. I understand the need , or more accurately the belief that there is a need, to regulate UAS fl ight for th e general safety of the public
, but the Section 333 guidelines adequately restrict UAS vehicles w ithout th e need to apply for an exemption

. I respectfully request that my exemption is granted to restore some of my individual liberties that the FAA saw fit to take away without seeking the approval of the people. My operations will be conducted with the utmost focus on safety and will obey the aforementioned guidelines set forth by Section 333.

Very Respectfully,

Michael Dill 2LT, U .S. Army
#### In the Matter of Elizabeth L. Ensign, as Executrix, etc., for an Order Requiring Martin S. Cuykendall, as Receiver, etc., to Refund Money, etc.

Order reversed without prejudice to any subsequent proceedings or suit, without costs. Opinion by

Hardin, *J.;*

Macomber, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1804 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1804

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 
 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ``Judge Isaac C. 
                       Parker Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 6th and 
Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office-Courthouse 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
§ 76.05-15 Fire main system. ( a ) Fire pumps, hydrants, hose, and nozzles shall be installed on the following vessels: ( 1 ) On all self-propelled vessels.
( 2 ) After July 1, 1957, on all barges with sleeping accommodations for more than six persons.
( b ) The arrangement and details of the fire main system shall be as set forth in subpart 76.10.
SUPREME COURT.

#### Hartman agt. Mayor, &c., of New York.

*Special Term,*

February, 1874.

*Satan'y of civil justices in tlie city of New Ywh.*

The legislature, by the tax-levy act of 1870 for the city of New York, fixed the salaries of civil justices at $10,000 per year. The city charter of 1873 fixed the salaries of said justices at $5,000 per year. Both acts being equally constitutional, the salaries fixed by the city charter must control.

The plaintiff sues to recover his salary as civil justice at the rate of $10,000 per annum. The defendant by answer claims that by the charter of 1873 the salary of civil justices was reduced to $5,000. The plaintiff demurs to this answer.

*David J.*Dean, for defendants.

*A. Oakey*Hall, for plaintiff.

Van Brunt, *J.*

— The salary which the plaintiff claims in this action was fixed at $10,000, pursuant to the provisions of the city tax levy of 1870, which was entitled “an act to provide for the local government of the city of Hew York.” It is conceded that in such an act the legislature had the power to regulate the salaries of the civil justices.

In 1873 the legislature, in an act entitled “ an act to reorganize the local government of the city of Hew York,” fixed the salaries of civil justices at $5,000, at which rate the defendants are willing to pay.

*352It must be admitted that civil justices are not city officers, but I am wholly unable to understand what legislation in respect to their salary should be constitutional when contained in the tax levy, and unconstitutional when contained in the city charter. The title of the first act is no more comprehensive than the other, the first being entitled “ an act to make provision for the local government,” &e., and the second *“*an act to reorganize the local government,” &e. In fact the last title is most comprehensive, and would embrace all subjects relating to every question affecting the city treasury. I can see no reason why, in the city charter, the legislature may not fix and limit the amount of moneys to be paid out of the city treasury precisely the same as it does in the tax levy. In fact, I know of no subject which can be legislated upon in a city' tax levy which cannot be embraced within its charter.

Demurrer must be overruled.
§ 1570.109 Submission and approval. ( a ) *Submission of security program.* Each owner/operator required under parts 1580, 1582, or 1584 of this subchapter to adopt and carry out a security program must submit it to TSA for approval in a form and manner prescribed by TSA.
( b ) *Security training deadlines.* Except as otherwise directed by TSA, each owner/operator required under subpart B to part 1580, 1582, or 1584 of this subchapter to develop a security training program must— ( 1 ) Submit its program to TSA for approval no later than June 21, 2021.
( 2 ) If commencing or modifying operations so as to be subject to the requirements of subpart B to 49 CFR parts 1580, 1582, or 1584 after June 21, 2021, submit a training program to TSA no later than 90 calendar days before commencing new or modified operations.
( c ) *TSA approval.* ( 1 ) No later than 60 calendar days after receiving the proposed security program required by subpart B to 49 CFR parts 1580, 1582, and 1584, TSA will either approve the program or provide the owner/operator with written notice to modify the program to comply with the applicable requirements of this subchapter. TSA will notify the owner/operator if it needs an extension of time to approve the program or provide the owner/operator with written notice to modify the program to comply with the applicable requirements of this subchapter.
( 2 ) *Notice to modify.* If TSA provides the owner/operator with written notice to modify the security program to comply with the applicable requirements of this subchapter, the owner/operator must provide a modified security program to TSA for approval within the timeframe specified by TSA.
( 3 ) TSA may request additional information, and the owner/operator must provide the information within the time period TSA prescribes. The 60-day period for TSA approval or modification will begin when the owner/operator provides the additional information.
(g) *Petition for reconsideration.* Within 30 days of receiving the notice to modify, the owner/operator may file a petition for reconsideration under § 1570.119 of this part. [85 FR 16499, Mar. 23, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 67683, Oct. 26, 2020; 86 FR 23632, May 4, 2021]
#### Seth Parsons, *Committee, etc., Respondent, v.*Isaac W. Winne, and others, *Appellants.*

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
98-2586.

#### State v. Ference.

Portage App. No. 97-P-0073. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, July 11, 1995 (92), Para 92.37 Leave of Absence]
[Page 1112]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.92.37  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. YATES, for today;
  To Miss COLLINS of Michigan, for today from 2 p.m. until 4 p.m.;
  To Mr. FOGLIETTA, for July 10; and
  To Ms. McKINNEY, today.
  And then,
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

XAVIER S. DURAH,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 445 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED. Petitioner's "Motion for Leave to File Sealed Supplemental Appendix to

Petition for Allowance of Appeal" is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service 

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury. 

# ACTION:

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 13 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006 at 71 FR 37694. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named company under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds was terminated effective May 31, 2007. Federal bond-approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2006 Revision, to reflect this change. 

With respect to any bonds currently in force with the above listed company, bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted from this company, and bonds that are continuous in nature should not be renewed. 

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782. 

Dated: June 4, 2007. 

Vivian L. Cooper, 

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 07-2956 Filed 6-14-07; 8:45am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
§ 1550.5 Operations using a sterile area. ( a ) *Applicability of this section.* This section applies to all aircraft operations in which passengers, crewmembers, or other individuals are enplaned from or deplaned into a sterile area, except for scheduled passenger operations, public charter passenger operations, and private charter passenger operations, that are in accordance with a security program issued under part 1544 or 1546 of this chapter.
( b ) *Procedures.* Any person conducting an operation identified in paragraph (a) of this section must conduct a search of the aircraft before departure and must screen passengers, crewmembers, and other individuals and their accessible property (carry-on items) before boarding in accordance with security procedures approved by TSA.
( c ) *Sensitive security information.* The security program procedures approved by TSA for operations specified in paragraph (a) of this section are sensitive security information. The operator must restrict the distribution, disclosure, and availability of information contained in the security procedures to persons with a need to know as described in part 1520 of this chapter.
( d ) *Compliance date.* Persons conducting operations identified in paragraph (a) of this section must implement security procedures on October 6, 2001.
( e ) *Waivers.* TSA may permit a person conducting an operation under this section to deviate from the provisions of this section if TSA finds that the operation can be conducted safely under the terms of the waiver.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Hawley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James C. HawleyJames C. HawleySenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2005
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 26, 2013

----

Bank Holding Companies            Trustmark Corporation, Jackson, Mississippi -- to merge with BancTrust Financial Group, Inc., Mobile, Alabama, and to acquire its subsidiary, BankTrust (FRB Order No. 2013-1).            -Approved, January 24, 2013            Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms (FR 2034).            -Proposed, January 23, 2013                        Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the disclosure and reporting requirements of CRA-Related Agreements (Reg G) and disclosure requirements of Subpart H of Regulation H (Consumer Protections in Sales of Insurance) (Reg H-7).            -Approved, January 24, 2013            Enforcement            Farmers and Merchants Bancshares, Inc., Burlington, Iowa -- written agreement dated February 28, 2011, terminated January 18, 2013.            -Announced, January 24, 2013                        Flathead Holding Company of Bigfork, Bigfork, Montana -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.            -Announced, January 22, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received: