alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 25, 2012

|Filer                                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|FARMERS NATIONAL BANCORP OF CYNTHIANA, INC. | CIC           | Interagency Notice of Change in Bank Control by Richard M. Wehrle, acting in his representative capacity as conservator for James A. Brown, to acquire in his representative capacity 10 percent or more of the shares and thereby control Farmers National Bancorp of Cynthiana, Inc., Cynthiana, Kentucky and indirectly control both Farmers National Bank of Cynthiana, Cynthiana, Kentucky and Deposit Bank of Carlisle, Carlisle, Kentucky | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                                  | Not available
|Federal Register:                           | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2012 (October 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1865 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1865

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide that the 
     same limitation on contributions to candidates shall apply to 
         multicandidate political committees and other persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1995

Mr. Whitfield introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide that the 
     same limitation on contributions to candidates shall apply to 
         multicandidate political committees and other persons.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAME LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES TO APPLY TO 
              MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND OTHER PERSONS.
    Section 315(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 441a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking out ``$1,000'' and 
        inserting in lieu thereof ``$3,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking out ``$5,000'' and 
        inserting in lieu thereof ``$3,000''.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with respect to 
elections taking place more than 6 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 97.15-30 Emergency lighting and power systems. ( a ) Where fitted, it shall be the duty of the master to see that the emergency lighting and power systems are operated and inspected at least once in each week that the vessel is navigated to be assured that the system is in proper operating condition.
( b ) Internal combustion engine driven emergency generators shall be operated under load for at least 2 hours, at least once in each month that the vessel is navigated.
( c ) Storage batteries for emergency lighting and power systems shall be tested at least once each 6-month period that the vessel is navigated to demonstrate the ability of the storage battery to supply the emergency loads for the period of time specified in Table 112.05-5(a) of this chapter.
( d ) The date of the tests and the condition and performance of the apparatus shall be noted in the official log book.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 17014, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19906, Dec. 30, 1970; 36 FR 5606, Mar. 25, 1971]
J

- S92013

- 16

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 SHERRI ADELKOFF,

Appellee

v. STEVEN ADELKOFF,

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 711 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Decree April 25, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Family Court at No(s): FD 13

- 008242

- 016
BEFORE: SHOGAN, MOULTON, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.
DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED: April 21, 2017 I respectfully dissent. As this Court has explained, [a] trial court has broad discretion when fashioning an award of equitable distribution. Our standard of review when assessing the propriety of an order effec tuating the equitable distribution of marital property is “whether the trial court abused its discretion by a misapplication of the law or failure to follow proper legal procedure.” We do not lightly find an abuse of discretion, which requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence. This Court will not find an “abuse of discretion” unless the law has been “overridden or misapplied or the judgment exercised” was “manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill will, as shown by the evidence in the certified record.” In determining the propriety of an equitable distribution award, courts must consider the distribution scheme as a whole. “[W]e measure the circumstances of the case against the objective of effectuating economic justice between the parties and achieving a just determination of their property rightsJ

- S92013

- 16

- 2

-

Childress v. Bogosian , 12 A.3d 448, 455 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citations omitted). Here, the trial court found credible the testimony of Wife’s expert, Mr. Brabender, who concluded that Husband’s interest in IEP could not be valued at the time of the equitable distribution hearing. Trial Court Opinion, 7/7/2016, at 11. Based on this testimony, the court determined that IEP was a going concern and crafted an order requiring Husband to hold the IEP interest in a constructive trust for the benefit of both parties. It was well
within the court’s discretion to defer distribution of Husband’s IEP interest until such interest can be valued. Based on our standard of review, I beli eve
we must affirm. Additionally, I note that, while deferred disposition schemes are not favored generally, in situations such as the one presented here, such arrangements serve economic justice in the long run. I am unconvinced that the Majority’s rema nd for a hearing at this juncture will result in a final distribution order because there is no guarantee that the IEP interest can be
valued at this time. If Mr. Brabender testifies that the interest cannot be valued, and the learned trial judge agrees a nd Husband again appeals, do
we have a second do

- over? Experts are costly and attorneys are equally expensive. The parties have had their bite at the apple. Remands could go
ad infinitum

.J

- S92013

- 16

- 3

-

Accordingly, because I find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in crafting its equitable distribution order, I would affirm.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,436
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,696
<PP&E>                                         201,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,406,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,504
<BONDS>                                        958,119
<COMMON>                                           455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     911,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,406,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               413,689
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,367
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  7,456
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
§ 34.50-80 Location and number of fire extinguishers required for vessels constructed prior to August 22, 2016—TB/ALL. Vessels contracted for prior to August 22, 2016, must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Previously installed extinguishers with extinguishing capacities smaller than as required in table 34.50-10(a) need not be replaced and may be continued in service so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) All new equipment and installations must meet the applicable requirements in this subpart for new vessels.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48250, July 22, 2016]
#### Fabiano R. Francke and Jonas R. Francke, *Appellants, v.*Kate L. Youmans and Edward L. Youmans, *Respondents.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Brady, J.
ex10_74.htm


Exhibit 10.74







 


 


 


 


 


 


Loan agreement and Promissory Note


January 4, 2012






















I, Ronald Krochack, agree to loan National Automation Services, Inc. (NAS) located at P.O. Box 531744, Henderson, Nevada the sum of $15,000 according to the following terms and conditions:







The $15,000 is being loaned to NAS with an interest rate of 7% (annual) as of January 4, 2012.







The loan in principle and interest is payable on demand.




























 



	
/s/ Ronald Krochak

	 







Ronald Krochack


Investor







 

 









 



	/s/ Robert Chance	 









Robert Chance


CEO National Automation Services, Inc.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 16, 1995 (46), Para 46.19 Speaker and Minority Leader to Accept Resignations, Appoint Commissions]
[Page 414]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.46.19  speaker and minority leader to accept resignations, appoint 
          commissions

  On motion of Mr. SOLOMON, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That, notwithstanding any adjournment of the House until 
Tuesday, March 21, 1995, the Speaker and the Minority Leader be 
authorized to accept resignations and to make appointments to 
commissions, boards and committees duly authorized by law or by the 
House.
```
exh_101.htm


Exhibit 10.1







[Steelcase Inc. letterhead]












October 9, 2013












 


Mr. James P. Keane


901 44th St., SE


Grand Rapids, MI  49508







Dear Jim,







I am pleased to offer you the position of President and Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2014.  This letter is to confirm, in writing, the principal elements of your compensation package effective March 1, 2014.







Annual Base Salary



	
-

	
Annual base salary $800,000








	
-

	
Bi-weekly salary $30,769.23








	
-

	
Eligibility for next merit increase will be May 2015












Performance Review



	
-

	
A review of your performance will be completed annually at or around the close of each fiscal year.












Bonus Program



	
-

	
As a participant in the Steelcase Inc. Management Incentive Plan (MIP), your FY15 annual target will remain 90%.








	
-

	
Bonus payments are made annually, after the close of the fiscal year.












Long-Term Compensation (LTI)



	
-

	
You will continue to participate in the long-term incentive program, currently consisting of performance stock units (PSUs) and restricted stock units (RSUs).








	
-

	
Awards are made annually at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, subject to ratification of the Board of Directors, and the next award is expected to be in April 2014.








	
-

	
We expect that your FY15 LTI award would be targeted at approximately 250% of your annual base salary and would be delivered in a mix of 25% RSUs and 75% PSUs. The PSUs would be awarded as two separate awards, one using the performance measure of three-year relative total shareholder return (TSR) and the other using three-year average return on invested capital (ROIC).














  





  











  










Mr. James P. Keane


October 9, 2013


Page 2




 


 


 


Stock Ownership Guidelines



	
-

	
You will have an ownership guideline of five times your base salary.












Executive Severance Plan



	
-

	
You will participate in the plan as a “Level 1 Employee.”












Special One-time Award of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)



	 	
–

	
The Compensation Committee has approved, and the Board of Directors has ratified, an award to you of 150,000 RSUs with a grant date of October 9, 2013, the standard award terms and tiered vesting to occur in equal thirds at the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.












Please note that your compensation is subject to review and approval by the Compensation Committee and ratification by the Board of Directors and is subject to the terms of the applicable plans, programs and award agreements.







Nothing in this letter is intended to alter the at-will nature of our employment relationship.







Jim, I look forward to working with you in your new role.  Please let me know if you have any questions.







Sincerely,







/s/ Robert C. Pew III







Robert C. Pew III


Chair of the Board of Directors


Steelcase Inc.












I accept and agree to the terms offered in this letter.


 



	/s/ James P. Keane 	October 9, 2013
	James P. Keane 	Date
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending January 21, 2012

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 4c8            | Bank of China Limited, Beijing, China, to engage de novo through its newly formed subsidiary BOCI Commodities & Futures (USA) LLC, New York, New York, in acting as a futures commission merchant pursuant to section 225.28(b)(7)(iv) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:     | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1503.615 Notice of hearing. ( a ) *Notice.* The ALJ must give each party at least 60 days notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing. With the consent of the ALJ, the parties may agree to hold the hearing on an earlier date than the date specified in the notice of hearing.
( b ) *Date, time, and location of the hearing.* The ALJ to whom the proceedings have been assigned must set a reasonable date, time, and location for the hearing. The ALJ must consider the need for discovery and any joint procedural or discovery schedule submitted by the parties when determining the hearing date. The ALJ must give due regard to the convenience of the parties, the location where the majority of the witnesses reside or work, and whether the location is served by a scheduled air carrier.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3057]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


July 5, 2007, Public Hearing; Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Thursday, July 5, 2007.

Place: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Hearing OPEN to the Public at 2 p.m.

Purpose: Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's 
Board of DIrectors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present 
views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

Procedures: Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must 
provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 
p.m., Friday, June 29, 2007. The notice must include the individual's 
name, title, organization, address, and telephone number, and a concise 
summary of the subject matter to be presented.
    Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for 
individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, 
to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request to 
participate an opportunity to be heard.
    Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record 
must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no 
later than 5 p.m., Friday, June 29, 2007. Such statements must be 
typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.
    Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda 
for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on 
which each participate will speak, and the time allotted for each 
presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.
    A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary 
will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's 
CorporateSecretary, at the cost of reproduction.

Contact Person For Information: Information on the hearing may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 
218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0e09021a032d021d040e430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5132353e263f113e2138327f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

    June 18, 2007.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-3057 Filed 6-18-07; 12:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.23 Bills Presented to the President]
[Page 652]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.23  bills presented to the president

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Administration, reported that 
that committee did on this day present to the President, for his 
approval, bills of the House of the following titles:

           On May 8, 1995:
       H.R. 421. An Act to amend the Alaska Native Claims 
     Settlement Act to provide for the purchase of common stock of 
     Cook Inlet region, and for other purposes.
       H.R. 517. An Act to amend title V of Public Law 96-550, 
     designating the Charo Culture Archeological Protection Sites, 
     and for other purposes.
       H.R. 1380. An Act to provide a moratorium on certain class 
     action lawsuits relating to the Truth in Lending Act.
```
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





1.  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Group Holdings, Inc. fka, Oasis Online Technologies Corp., a Minnesota company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB A/1 for the Quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer