alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations of Computer Network
Technology Corporation as of and for the six months ending June 30, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      7,383,918 
<SECURITIES>                               22,422,309 
<RECEIVABLES>                              18,204,583 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  775,015
<INVENTORY>                                12,583,427 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           62,971,092       
<PP&E>                                     29,579,230      
<DEPRECIATION>                             18,581,441    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             79,988,186      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      20,199,949    
<BONDS>                                       807,955  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                      225,320 
<OTHER-SE>                                 58,754,962       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               79,988,186         
<SALES>                                    29,196,827          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           42,443,410          
<CGS>                                       8,942,890          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              18,039,821          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            8,055,640<F1>       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,050       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (767,426)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                (287,000)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (480,426)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                (480,426) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.02) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.02) 
<FN>

<F1> Amount presented represents engineering and development expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 9, 2006   /s/ Teresa A. Herbert* Teresa A. Herbert Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
ex10.2

 

 PROMISSORY NOTE - Extension and now on Demand
 

 

 	 	
	 $95.000 US
	 July 18, 2013


 

 

 FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDIRATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged previously in June 2013, Crown Alliance Capital Limited hereby promises to pay to the order of Lorraine Fusco (HOLDER) the sum of Ninety Five Thousand US on demand. This Note shall bear interest at the rate of FOURTEEN (14%) per annum. All principal and interest due hereunder shall be paid on demand.
 

 

 Signed at Vaughan this 18th Day of July, 2013.
 

 

 	 	
	 /s/ Witness
	 /s/ Lorraine Fusco
Submitted on record and briefs September 22,

reversed and remanded October 18, 1995

#### In the Matter of Joan M. Weaver, Alleged, to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JOAN M. WEAVER, *Appellant.*

(95MH115; CA A87955)

903 P2d 420

George W. Kelly filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v.*Allison, 129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994).
-1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DEXTER ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

B. TRUE, ARDETTA MOODY,

MATTHEW BURNETT, and 

ANDRE MCCLATCHEY, 

Defendants. 

 / 

Case No. 15-cv-11703 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DAVID R. GRAND

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION [55] TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

DAVID R. GRAND’S ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PERMISSION TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMIT

On June 1, 2016, Defendants filed an Ex Parte Motion to Exceed Page Limit 

for their Motion for Summary Judgment. See Dkt. No. 45. On June 2, 2016, 

Magistrate Judge David R. Grand granted the Motion. See Dkt. 48. Before the 

Court is Plaintiff’s Objection [55] to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand’s Order. 

“A district court shall consider objections to a magistrate judge’s nondispositive orders, and shall modify or set aside any portion of the orders found to 

be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Wendorf v. JLG Indus., Inc., No. 08-CV12229, 2010 WL 148255, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2010) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)). “A ruling is clearly erroneous if, upon review of 

2:15-cv-11703-GAD-DRG Doc # 60 Filed 06/29/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 624
-2- 

the record, the district court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a 

mistake has been made.” Id. 

Under this Court’s Local Rules, a page limit may be extended upon leave of 

the Court. See E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(d)(3)(A). In the present case, the Defendants 

filed an Ex Parte Motion setting forth their reasons for needing a page limit 

extension. Among those reasons, Defendants listed that they are moving to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s case on seven different grounds, and that the case is relatively fact 

intensive. Dkt. No. 45 at 2 (Pg. ID No. 447). Magistrate Judge Grand found 

Defendants’ reasons sufficient to grant leave. This decision was not “clearly 

erroneous or contrary to law.” Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objection fails. 

For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiff’s Objection [55] is 

OVERRULED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 29, 2016 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

Detroit, MI HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

 United States District Court Judge

2:15-cv-11703-GAD-DRG Doc # 60 Filed 06/29/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 625
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 13, 2005

 

/s/ Teresa A. Herbert*

Teresa A. Herbert

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, April 5, 1995 (56), Para 56.20 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 483]
[Page 577]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.56.20  providing for the consideration of h.r. 483

  Ms. PRYCE, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. No. 
104-103) the resolution (H. Res. 130) providing for the consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 483) to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 
permit medicare select policies to be offered in all States, and for 
other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 106.85 Requesting a public meeting. ( a ) You may ask for a public meeting by filing a written request with PHMSA no later than 20 days before the expiration of the comment period specified in the rulemaking document. Send your request for a public meeting to: Docket Management System, U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( b ) PHMSA will review your request and, if you have shown good cause for a public meeting, we will grant it and publish a notice of the meeting in the Federal Register.
[67 FR 42954, June 25, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 55682, Oct. 1, 2007]
§ 1150.44 Caption summary. The caption summary must be in the following form. The information symbolized by numbers is identified in the key as follows: Surface Transportation Board Notice of Exemption STB Finance Docket No. (1)—Exemption (2)-(3) ( 1 ) Has filed a notice of exemption to (2) (3)'s line between (4). Comments must be filed with the Board and served on (5). (6). Key to symbols: ( 1 ) Name of carrier acquiring or operating the line. ( 2 ) The type of transaction, e.g., to acquire or operate. ( 3 ) The transferor. ( 4 ) Describe the line. ( 5 ) Petitioner's representative, address, and telephone number. ( 6 ) Cross reference to other class exemptions being used. The notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.41. If the notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void *ab initio.* The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction. [61 FR 32355, June 24, 1996; 61 FR 36965, July 15, 1996]
#### § 1007.2 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Board* means the Surface Transportation Board.

*Chairman* means the Presidentially appointed Board Member who is the administrative head of the Surface Transportation Board.

*Privacy Officer* refers to the individual designated to process requests and handle various other matters relating to the Board's implementation of the Privacy Act of 1974.

*Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

*Maintain* means the maintenance, collection, use, or dissemination (of records).

*Record* means any item, collection or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph.

*Statistical Record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual, except as provided by section 8 of Title 13 of the United States Code.

*System of records* means a group of any records under the control of the Board retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.

*Routine use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose of which the record was compiled.

*Agency* means any executive department, military department, Government corporation, Government-controlled corporation or other establishment in the Executive Branch of the Government or any independent regulatory agency.
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 0 9 - 2 1 3 - CV S HE Z AD M AL I K AP P E L L ANT V . THO M AS SLONE AN D APPE L L EE S M I C H A EL M EYER

----- ----- --

FR O M THE 96TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- Appe l l a ntSh e z a d M a l i ka t t e m pt s t o a pp e a l f r om t het r i a l c ou rt ’ s M a y 22, 2 0 0 9 i n ter loc u to ry o rde r, w h i c h g ran ted the A p p e l l e e s’ m o ti o n to d i sq u a l i fy hi m . O n Jul y 24 , 2 00 9, w e sentM al i k a l et t erst at i ng ou rconcer n t hatw e m ay hav e n o j ur i sd i ct i on ov ert hi s app ea l be ca us e t he or derdoe s notap pea rt o be a f in a l a p p e a la b le o r d e ro rju d g m e n t , n o rd o e s ita p p e a rt o b e a n a p p e a la b le i n t e rl o c u to ryo rd e r. S ee Tex . C i v. Pr ac. & Rem . C ode A nn. § 5 1. 01 4( a)2 ... M a l i k , in h is re s p o n s e , r e q u e s t s a w r ito fm a n d a m u s . B e c a u s e h is

r es pons e d oesnotco m pl y w i t h t he r equ i si t esf ora pet i t i on f orw r i tof m and am us , w e h aves enta nonc om pl i anc e l et t er . Shoul d M al i k f i l e a c om pl i ant pet i t i on f orw r i to fm a nd a m us , t ha tp e t i t i on w i l l b e f i l e d i n a s e pa r a t e c a us e num ber . Thi s opi ni on add r essesand f i nal l y di sposes of t he i nt er l ocutory appeal onl y. 2 ( Ver no n 2008) (l i s ti n g a p p e a l a b le in t e rl o c u to ryo rd e rs ); Lehm annv. Har- Con Cor p. , 39 S. W . 3d 1 91 , 1 95 ( Tex . 2 00 1) ( pr ovi di ng gener al r ul e t hatan appeal m a yb e t a k e n o n lyf r o m a f in a l ju d g m e n t ). W e in d ic a t e d t h a t t h is c o u rtw o u ld di sm i ss t hi s app ea l i fw e d i d notr ec ei ve a r es pons e s how i ng gr oundsf or conti nui ng t he appeal by A ugu st3, 20 09 . M al i k f i l e d a ti m el y r esponse, a c k no w l e dg i ng t ha tt he r e i s n o i nt e r l oc ut ory a pp e a l a va i l a bl e f r om t heM a y 22, 200 9 i nt er l ocu t or y or derdi sp os i ng oft he di sq ual i f i ca t i on m ot i on. A ccor di ngl y, because t he or deri s nei t hera f i nal j udg m entnoran app ea l abl e i nt er l ocu t or y or der , w e di sm i ss t hi s app ea l f or w ant ofj ur i sd i ct i on. 2 S ee T e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (a ), 4 3 .2 (f).

SU E W A LKER J U S T I C E PA N EL: W A LKER, M C C O Y, an d M EI ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Aug us t20, 2009
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA-TBD Directorate Identifier: TBD-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly, If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) om) Products 

Inspection and 

removal of affected 3.0 s .::55.00 :~, .::s:>.ot. 200 S::' l .OU(,_:)t1 

part .,. D.CG $ o_no c.; iJ-'JU " I \).!}I) I 0.00 s j)_ij(j 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 ') :J.r;i; 

~ D.OC $ O.ilO s 0.00 

' ' (,' (}(J $ i}i)(j s O.Oil 

$ 0. (}i) ' O.UG s o.uu 

$ o_rjO $ O.IJQ s O.OU 

:s OJ•I) I G.UC' s l).t'iO 

I ' o.no $ ()_(1(, s O.tK 

I ().()(} .I 0.00 s t)_il(J 

$ i:.G0 .'j; o. nu s I!.('\.' 

c 

" l}(•f; I o.ro ' ' ll.OC 

s 0.1!0 " 0.01) s •J.CU ' ,. 

" 0.00 ., 0. l)i) s O.Ot· 

$ i\00 I Q_()i) ::: .)J)Ij 

,:; f).()Q ·~ {)_()!) ::; (j ,I )I; 

I \i .I!C -s o.on s •}_()i) 

., 

' U.iji) -~ ()_l)() ,, ::_ \)\] 

'I o.nu -~ 0.00 s ,_._li•) 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of comuliance for U.S. fleet: $51,000 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work~hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hom) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

$ ()_')() :5 --,_._;(, 

·s {)- \)() _-s .:'. ·)i 

' (L)(; 

' ()_(_)() s •j\ 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? -· 

YES' D NOIZ] 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? '-

YES' D NOIZ] 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.-

YES D NOIZ] 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES' D NOIZ] 

*Explanation:
_






Exhibit 10.13




AMENDMENT #1

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT – JERRY NORMAN




This amendment is effective February 7, 2005.




BETWEEN:




THE NEPTUNE SOCIETY, INC, a Florida corporation having its offices at 4312 Woodman Avenue, Third Floor, Sherman Oaks, CA  91423;




(the “Company”)




AND:




Jerry Norman, an individual having his residence at 1661 204th Ave, NE, Sammamish, WA  98074;




(the “Employee”)




WHEREAS, Marco Markin has resigned as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and,




WHEREAS, section one of the employment agreement between the Company and the Employee calls for the employee to resign as President and assume the title of Senior Executive Vice President in the event of Markin’s resignation and,




WHEREAS, the Company wishes to maintain the Employee in the position of President and wishes to appoint the Employee to the additional position of Chief Executive Officer and the Employee wishes to accept those positions,




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto mutually covenant and agree as follows:




1.

The requirement that the Employee resign from the position of President in the event of Markin’s resignation is waived.

2.

From the effective date of this amendment until further amended, the Employee will assume the role and title of President and Chief Executive Officer.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written:




THE NEPTUNE SOCIETY, INC.

EMPLOYEE:










__________________________

___________________________

Authorized Signatory

Jerry Norman




In the presence of:







__________________________

Witness







__________________________

Name







__________________________

Address
#### Sophia Awa, *as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v.*Henry Schlender, *Respondent*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. *Held,*that there is no evidence in the appeal book that the verdict was set aside as against evidence.
Exhibit 10.25


 


 


 





 





 


 


September 10, 2013


 


 


 


 


Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.


2710 Kent Avenue


West Lafayette, Indiana 47906


Attn: Jacqueline M. Lemke, Interim President &
CEO


 


 


 


Dear Ms. Lemke:


 


Incidental
to that certain Loan Agreement entered into by and between Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. ("Borrower") and Regions Bank
("Bank") dated December 18, 2007 (such Loan Agreement, as amended, hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Loan
Agreement"), and subject to further conditions set forth herein, Bank hereby waives Borrower's compliance with the Total Liabilities
to Tangible Net Worth Ratio covenant as set forth in Section


8(c) for the period ending as of December 31, 2012
and March 31, 2013.


 


The waiver
of Borrower's compliance with the financial covenant as set forth above constitutes a singular waiver and shall not be deemed to
be or to imply Bank's waiver of Borrower's strict compliance with the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement. The waiver contained
herein is also subject to receipt by Bank of such additional documentation as may be required by Bank to modify the Loan Agreement
and other related loan documents and to provide further security for the loans from Bank to Borrower.


 


The
waiver granted herein shall not be deemed to create a course of conduct or obligation upon Bank to waive Borrower's future non-compliance
with any of the terms or provisions as set forth in the Loan Agreement. No delay or omission
of Bank to exercise any right or power under the Loan Agreement shall impair such right or power or be construed as a waiver of
any default or as an acquiescence except as expressly set forth herein. All waivers of Borrower's noncompliance with the terms
and provisions of the Loan Agreement shall not be valid unless in writing and signed by Bank, and then only to the extent specifically
set forth in such writing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75801, 333-77211 and 333-85324) and Form S-3
(No. 333-122020) of MicroFinancial Incorporated of our report dated February 7,
2005 relating to the financial statements which appear in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of MicroFinancial Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 2005
#### § 1021.1 Standards.

The regulations issued jointly by the Comptroller General of the United States and the Attorney General of the United States under section 3 of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended, (31 U.S.C. 3701 *et seq.*) and published in 31 CFR parts 900 through 904 are hereby adopted by the Surface Transportation Board for the administrative collection of enforcement claims.

[81 FR 8852, Feb. 23, 2016]