alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1155.27 Petitions to modify, amend, or revoke a land-use-exemption permit. *General rule.* Petitions to modify, amend, or revoke land-use-exemption permits shall be decided in accordance with the Board's normal standard of review for petitions to reopen administratively final Board actions at 49 CFR 1115.4. The petition must demonstrate material error, new evidence, or substantially changed circumstances that warrant the requested action, and is subject to these additional conditions: ( a ) An entity that petitions for a modification or amendment requesting an expansion of federal preemption or the facility's operations or physical size is subject to the notice and application requirements in this subpart C. The language of the notifications shall be modified to note that the petition is for a modification or amendment.
( b ) The Board will approve or deny petitions to modify, amend, or revoke a land-use-exemption permit within 90 days after the full record for the petition is developed.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 16, 2010

|Filer                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC. | * 3A1         | Rockville Financial, Rockville, Connecticut, to acquire 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Rockville Bank, Rockville, Connecticut pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act in connection with the reorganization of Rockville Financial, MHC, Rockville, Connecticut, from mutual to stock form. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/22/2010
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 10/22/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 19, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|ORRSTOWN BANK     | * Branch       | Orrstown Bank, Shippensburgh, PA, to establish a branch office located at 1000 Bryn Mawr Road, Carlisle, PA. | Newspaper:02/18/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 02/18/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2011 (April 1, 2011 - June 30, 2011)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1152.20 Notice of intent to abandon or discontinue service. ( a ) *Filing and publication requirements.* An applicant shall give Notice of Intent to file an abandonment or discontinuance application by complying with the following procedures: ( 1 ) *Filing.* Applicant must serve its Notice of Intent on the Board, by certified letter, in the format prescribed in § 1152.21. The Notice shall be filed in accordance with the time requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) *Service.* Applicant must serve, by first-class mail (unless otherwise specified), its Notice of Intent upon: ( i ) Significant users of the line;
( ii ) The Governor (by certified mail) of each state directly affected by the abandonment or discontinuance. (For the purposes of this section “states directly affected” are those in which any part of the line sought to be abandoned is located).
( iii ) The Public Service Commission (or equivalent agency) in these states;
( iv ) The designated state agency in these states;
( v ) The State Cooperative Extension Service in these states;
( vi ) The U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Railroad Administration);
( vii ) Department of Defense (Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, Transportation Engineering Agency, Railroads for National Defense Program);
( viii ) The U.S. Department of Interior (Recreation Resources Assistance Division, National Park Service);
( ix ) The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board;
( x ) The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) (if Amtrak operates over the involved line);
( xi ) The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Chief of the Forest Service; and
( xii ) The headquarters of all duly certified labor organizations that represent employees on the affected rail line.
( 3 ) *Posting.* Applicant must post a copy of its Notice of Intent at each agency station and terminal on the line to be abandoned. (If there are no agency stations on the line, the Notice of Intent should be posted at any agency station through which business for the involved line is received or forwarded.)
( 4 ) *Newspaper publication.* Applicant must publish its Notice of Intent at least once during each of 3 consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in each county in which any part of the involved line is located.
( b ) *Time limits.* ( 1 ) The Notice of Intent must be served at least 15 days, but not more than 30 days, prior to the filing of the abandonment application;
( 2 ) The Notice must be posted and fully published within the 30-day period prior to the filing of the application; and
( 3 ) The Notice must be filed with the Board either concurrently with service or when the Notice is first published (whichever occurs first).
( c ) *Environmental and Historic Reports.* Applicant must also submit the Environmental and Historic Reports described at §§ 1105.7 and 1105.8 at least 20 days prior to filing an application.
[61 FR 67883, Dec. 24, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 67810, Dec. 4, 2003; 83 FR 15079, Apr. 9, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.123 Reconsideration. ( a ) An applicant for special permit, a special permit holder, or an applicant for party status to a special permit may request that the Associate Administrator reconsider a decision under § 107.113(g), § 107.117(e) or § 107.121(c) of this part. The request must— ( 1 ) Be in writing or by electronic means and filed within 20 days of receipt of the decision;
( 2 ) State in detail any alleged errors of fact and law;
( 3 ) Enclose any additional information needed to support the request to reconsider; and
( 4 ) State in detail the modification of the final decision sought.
( b ) The Associate Administrator grants or denies, in whole or in part, the relief requested and informs the requesting person in writing or by electronic means of the decision. If necessary to avoid a risk of significant harm to persons or property, the Associate Administrator may, in the notification, declare the action immediately effective.
[76 FR 463, Jan. 5, 2011]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.5 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1361]
[Page 632]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.5  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1361

  Mr. DIAZ-BALART, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported 
(Rept. No. 104-111) the resolution (H. Res. 139) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 1361) to authorize appropriations for 
fiscal year 1996 for the Coast Guard and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
#### Michael Cunningham, *Respondent, v.*John Reed, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending June 18, 2011

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|CARLILE BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3          | Carlile Bancshares, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, to acquire 100% of the common stock of The Bank at Broadmoor, Colorado Springs, Colorado. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/15/2011    
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | 07/15/2011    
|COMERICA BANK            | * Branch       | Comerica Bank, Dallas, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 411 West Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan.                  | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending August 20, 2011

|Filer                                 | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|COMMUNITY FIRST FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | * 3A1       | Community First Financial Group, Inc., Chapel Hill, North Carolina, to become a bank holding company in relation to Harrington Bank, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, proposed successor by charter conversion to Harrington Bank, FSB, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. | Newspaper:09/12/2011Federal Register:09/15/2011
|Newspaper:                            | 09/12/2011 
|Federal Register:                     | 09/15/2011 
|FNB UNITED CORP.                      | * 3A5       | FNB United Corp., Asheboro, North Carolina, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of Bank of Granite Corporation, Granite Falls, North Carolina, and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of Granite, Granite Falls, North Carolina.                               | Newspaper:09/04/2011Federal Register:09/09/2011
|Newspaper:                            | 09/04/2011 
|Federal Register:                     | 09/09/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2011 (October 1, 2011 - December 31, 2011)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 77.07-10 Lakes, bays, and sounds, or river service. ( a ) Vessels in lakes, bays, and sounds, or river service shall be fitted with such ground tackle and hawsers as deemed necessary by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, depending upon the size of the vessel and the waters on which it operates.
( b ) [Reserved]
6/4/15, 1:54 PM CineStar 8

Page 1 of 5 http://freeflysystems.com/products/cinestar/8/ A reliable and robust system, delivering the incredibly smooth footage professional aerial video and photographers demand. 

### The Ultimate Aerial Platform



# R E D E F ININ G MOVE M EN T  6/4/15, 1:54 PM CineStar 8

Page 2 of 5 http://freeflysystems.com/products/cinestar/8/ OPT I M I Z E D FOR M Ō V I IN T E GRAT I O N Freefly designed the MōVI line of camera stabilizers with the CineStar platform in mind, with the ability to go from filming handheld to capturing aerials in just a few

OP EN ARC H I T E CTUR E D E S I G N6/4/15, 1:54 PM CineStar 8

Page 3 of 5 http://freeflysystems.com/products/cinestar/8/ D E S I G N The ability to fly a variety of cameras and lenses is critical to professional users. The “open architecture” of the CineStar allows for cameras such as the Canon C500 and RED Epic to be flown on the same frame

TOP MOU N T E D BATT E RY CAG E In addition to providing ease of access to the battery and optimal CG (center of gravity) for best flight performance, the top mounted battery creates a structural cage around the sensitive flight control

ULTRA L I G H TW E I G H T FRAM E In an industry where every gram counts, Freefly designed the CineStar to be as sturdy and light as possible, utilizing carbon fiber

FROM T HESKY TO T HE ROAD The Cinestar line is not only designed to deliver the best aerial footage, but to travel easily. With the camera gimbal mounting plate, quick release booms and threaded nuts and inserts that only require one tool,

ADVA N C E D V I BRAT I O N6/4/15, 1:54 PM CineStar 8

Page 4 of 5 http://freeflysystems.com/products/cinestar/8/ F IN D D E AL E RS V I BRAT I O N I SOLAT I O N SYST E M Fully adjustable vibration isolation system ensures smooth and stable footage in even the most demanding filming conditions.

H I G H CURR EN T D I STR I BUT I O N BOARD A quick and robust connection from Freefly motors to the Freefly flight packs is possible with the solder-less distribution board that features four 12v power leads for driving LEDs or any other 12v accessory. Dual 10

M ED IA Gallery Vimeo YouTube STOR E Online Dealers NEWS Blog SOC IAL Twitter Facebook Instagram FR EEFLY About Us

Contact SUPPORT Forum Tutorials Software & Manuals Knowledge Base6/4/15, 1:54 PM CineStar 8

Page 5 of 5 http://freeflysystems.com/products/cinestar/8/
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), W. Douglas Parker,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Derek J. Kerr, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ W. Douglas Parker
Name:  W. Douglas Parker
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:  July 22, 2009 /s/ Derek J. Kerr
Name:  Derek J. Kerr
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:  July 22, 2009 This certification is being furnished to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 10.5
 Confidential Treatment Requested
 CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
 AMENDMENT NO. 9
TO
AMERICA WEST CO-BRANDED CARD AGREEMENT
 Amendment No. 9 Effective Date US Airways Group Juniper Bank
 RECITALS
 America West Original Agreement
 First Amendment Second Amendment Third Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment Seventh Amendment Eighth Amendment Agreement




---



##### 



Confidential Treatment Requested
 CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
 1. Definitions
 2. Amendment
 (i)
    
    US Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash shall be equal to or greater than $1.5
billion as measured at the end of each month and ***** pre-tax income
(excluding special items) measured ***** (Income Test); provided, however, for the
months of January 2009 and February 2009, US Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash shall be
equal to or greater than $1.4 billion and $1.45 billion, respectively, *****.
Provided further, for the months of August through October 2009, US Airways Groups
Unrestricted Cash shall be equal to or greater than $1.35 billion.For the purposes of this Section 14.3.1(i), the calculation of Unrestricted
Cash will include Collateral for fuel hedge contracts *****. By way of example, if
October is being measured for Novembers Subsequent Purchase, US Airways Groups
Unrestricted Cash (including the fuel hedge contracts) will be measured as of
October 31st*****.If US Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash falls below $1.5 billion in any month (other
than the months of January February, August, September and October 2009) but the
Income Test is met, then Juniper Bank will be required to purchase the additional
Pre-Purchased Miles for such month *****.By way of example, if US Airways Groups Unrestricted Cash falls below $1.5 billion
in May but the Income Test is met, then Juniper Bank will purchase the additional
Pre-Purchased Miles for such month. *****.
 3. Effectiveness
 4. Effect
 5. Entire Agreement
 6. Counterparts
 
 *****
    
    Confidential portions of the material have been omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  2




---



##### 



Confidential Treatment Requested
 CONFIDENTIAL
    
    EXECUTION COPY
  US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
    
    
    
    BARCLAYS BANK DELAWAREFormerly known asJUNIPER BANKBy:
    
    /s/ J. Scott Kirby
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Lloyd M. WirshbaJ. Scott Kirby
    
    
    
    
    
    Lloyd M. WirshbaTitle: President
    
    
    
    
    
    Title: CEO
 
 *****
    
    Confidential portions of the material have been omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  3
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-2571.

#### Am. Mun. Power-Ohio, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 97-838-EL-AEC. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 1, 2013

----

Enforcement            Border Bancshares, Inc., Greenbush, Minnesota -- written agreement dated May 27, 2010, terminated May 28, 2013.            -Announced, May 30, 2013                        Border Capital Group, Inc., McAllen, Texas -- written agreement dated October 20, 2011, terminated May 28, 2013.            -Announced, May 30, 2013                        CIT Group Inc., New York, New York -- written agreement dated August 12, 2009, terminated May 23, 2013.            -Announced, May 30, 2013                        Commerce Bank and Trust Holding Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Topeka, Kansas, and Commerce Bank and Trust Holding Company -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.            -Announced, May 30, 2013                        Market Bancorporation, Inc., Elk New Market, Minnesota -- written agreement dated February 10, 2011, terminated May 28, 2013.            -Announced, May 30, 2013                        Riverview Bancorp, Inc., Vancouver, Washington -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.            -Announced, May 30, 2013            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received: