alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1018.94 Review within the Board. ( a ) *Notification by Debtor.* A debtor who receives a Notice of Intent has the right to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable. To exercise this right, the debtor must: ( 1 ) Send a written request for a review of the evidence to the address provided in the notice.
( 2 ) State in the request the amount disputed and the reasons why the debtor believes that the debt is not past-due or is not legally enforceable.
( 3 ) Include in the request any documents which the debtor wishes to be considered or state that additional information will be submitted within the 60-day period.
( b ) *Submission of evidence.* The debtor may submit evidence showing that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable along with the notification required by paragraph (a) of this section. Failure to submit the notification and evidence within 60 days will result in an automatic referral of the debt to the IRS without further action by the Board.
( c ) *Review of the evidence.* The Board will consider all available evidence related to the debt. Within 30 days, if feasible, the Board will notify the debtor whether the Board has sustained, amended, or canceled its determination that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable.
Executive Order 13436

# Further Amending Executive Order 13381, as Amended, To Extend Its Duration by One Year

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to extend by 1 year the duration of Executive Order 13381 of June 27, 2005 (Strengthening Processes Relating to Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified National Security Information), as amended, it is hereby ordered that: 

**Section 1.**                     Section 6(a) of Executive Order 13381, as amended, is further amended by striking “April 1, 2007” and inserting in lieu thereof “April 1, 2008”.                 

**Sec. 2.**                     Section 6(b) of Executive Order 13381, as amended, is further amended by striking “July 1, 2007” and inserting in lieu thereof “July 1, 2008”.                

[FR Doc. 07-3258

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### CHRISTINE C. DOUROPOULOS, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF, v. KATHERINE DeVOE ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided September 19, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

Eor the plaintiff, *Theodore D. Parsons*and *Theodore J. Labrecque.*

Eor the defendants, *William, P. Holmwood.*

*782Pee Curiam.

This suit was brought to recover damages under the Death act. On the 21st day of April, 1928, the plaintiffs intestate, Dionysios C. Douropoulos, was driving a Ford coupe car upon Third avenue in a southerly direction in the borough of Spring Lake. As he was passing the intersection of St. Clair avenue a collision occurred with an automobile driven by Katherine DeVoe, wife of the defendant John L. DeVoe. She was going in a westerly direction along St. Clair avenue approaching Third avenue. The plaintiff’s intestate’s car swung around to the westward, until it struck the curb opposite a tree on the westerly side of Third avenue. The driver, Dionysios Douropoulos, was killed. Negligence of the defendants is charged in the complaint and negligence of the plaintiff’s intestate is charged by the defendants, as a defense.

The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants obtained a rule to show cause and filed four reasons for a new trial. Our examination of the record, the briefs of counsel and the reasons filed for a new trial lead us to the conclusion that the rule to show cause should be discharged. We find no substantial reason for disturbing the verdict found by the jury.

The case falls within that class of cases described in 1 *Thomp. Negl.,*§ 1322. Cases of collision on highways almost invariably involve questions of concurrent negligence on the part of both the actors cited with approval in *Fox*v. *Great Atlantic, Sc., Go.,*84 *N. J. L.*728, or as expressed by the phrase “congeries of concurrent circumstances,” a jury question is involved. *Daly*v. *Singac Auto Supply Co.,*103 *N. J. L.*416. The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



Certification of President



I, Wm. Lee Popham, President, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Admiral Financial Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: September 25, 2009



/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham, President
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 23, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2008 (April 1, 2008 - June 30, 2008)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141514

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141514 COA: 298073 Muskegon CC: 09-057588-FH ROBERT ALAN HEIBEL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 23, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 98

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 98.30-35 Warning sign at gangway.

If a vessel is moored, no person may transfer to or from a portable tank or IBC a product with a flashpoint of less than 300 °F unless the person in charge displays at each gangway or access that is open for use a warning placard containing the following in letters 2 inches in height or larger:

WARNING

No open lights

No smoking

[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]
32.2
            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.




I,
Timothy G. Byrd Sr., the Chief Financial Officer of Adino Energy Corporation,
hereby certify that to my knowledge, Adino Energy Corporation’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Adino Energy
Corporation.




Date: May
14, 2010





/s/
      Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.Timothy
      G. Byrd, Sr.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 25, 2010

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|NORTH VALLEY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Notice of Change in Bank Control by Clay P. Graham, Byran H. Graham, and James F. Graham, acting in concert, to acquire up to 26.67% of the outstanding voting shares of North Valley Bancshares, Inc. and thereby indirectly acquring control of the North Valley Bank, both of Zanesville, OH and Notice of Change in Bank Control by Clay P.Graham, individually to acquire 10.13% of the outstanding voting shares of North Valley Bancshares, Inc.and thereby indirectly acquiring control of the North Valley Bank, both of Zanesville, OH | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/29/2010
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 09/29/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 1103.26 Discussion of pending litigation in the public press.

Attempts to influence the action and attitude of the members and administrative law judges of the Board through propaganda or through colored or distorted articles in the public press, should be avoided. However, it is not against the public interest or unfair to the Board if the facts of pending litigation are made known to the public through the press in a fair and unbiased manner and in dispassionate terms. When the circumstances of a particular case appear to justify a statement to the public through the press, it is unethical to make it anonymously.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 20, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|1ST BANK          | * 18C          | 1st Bank, Evanston, Wyoming, to merge with First National Bank of Morgan, Morgan, Utah. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                 | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|WESTERN SECURITY BK, BILLINGS, MONTANA | 2999845 | 08/18/2008 | 12/11/2008     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 29, 2007 / Notices 29579 

limited to 5 minutes. If you would like 

to have the TAP consider a written 

statement, please call 1–888–912–1227 

or 206–220–6096, or write to Janice 

Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, 

MS W–406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you 

can contact us at http:// 

www.improveirs.org. Due to limited 

conference lines, notification of intent 

to participate in the telephone 

conference call meeting must be made 

with Janice Spinks. Miss Spinks can be 

reached at 1–888–912–1227 or 206–

220–6096. 

The agenda will include the following: 

Various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 20, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E7–10159 Filed 5–25–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF 

PEACE 

Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting 

DATE/TIME: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 (9 

a.m.–8 p.m.) Thursday, June 14, 2007 

(9:30 a.m.–4 p.m.) 

LOCATION: NDU—National War College, 

Roosevelt Hall, Ft. McNair, 300 5th 

Avenue, Washington, DC. 

STATUS: Open Session—Portions may be 

closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of 

Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States 

Code, as provided in subsection 

1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute 

of Peace Act, Public Law 98–525. 

AGENDA: June 2007 Board Meeting; 

Approval of Minutes of the One 

Hundred Twenty-Sixth Meeting (March 

12, 2007) of the Board of Directors; 

Chairman’s Report; President’s Report; 

Program Updates; Selection of National 

Peace Essay Contest Winners; Selection 

of Peace Scholars; Other General Issues. 

CONTACT: Tessie F. Higgs, Executive 

Office, Telephone: (202) 429–3836. 

Dated: May 22, 2007. 

Patricia P. Thompson, 

Executive Vice President, United States 

Institute of Peace. 

[FR Doc. 07–2648 Filed 5–24–07; 11:09 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–AR–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
(i)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-100635) pertaining to the Psychiatric
Solutions, Inc. 1997 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Key Personnel of
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.;(ii)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-94983) pertaining to the 1997 Equity
Incentive Plan of PMR Corporation;(iii)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-38419) pertaining to the 1997 Equity
Incentive Plan, 1995 Warrant Grant and the 1996 Stock Option Grants of PMR Corporation;(iv)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-118529) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated
Outside Directors Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan;(v)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-128047) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan;(vi)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-136339) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan;(vii)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-158957) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan;(viii)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-163109) of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.; and(ix)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-4, No. 333-163111) of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.;
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 04/29/2010 

 

Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

High-Intensity 

Discharge Lamps 

Proposed 

Determination 

Analytical 

Spreadsheets 

The U.S. Department of Energy 

(DOE) prepared the analytical 

spreadsheets listed below for 

the proposed determination on 

high-intensity discharge (HID) 

lamps. 

z Life-Cycle Cost and 

National Energy 

Savings/Net Present 

Value Spreadsheet 

(Excel 6.1 MB) 

z HID Lamp Surveyed Data 

(Excel 695 KB) 

Contact Information 

Linda Graves

Lighting Standards Project 

Manager 

(202) 586-1851 

Printable Version 

EERE Information Center 

Programs and Offices 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Prop... Page 1 of 2

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/hid_analytical_spr... 5/3/2010

EE-DET-03-001 COMMENT 20
Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Prop... Page 2 of 2

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/hid_analytical_spr... 5/3/2010

EE-DET-03-001 COMMENT 20