alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NanoPierce
Technologies,  Inc.  for  the  year  ended  June 30, 2003, I, Paul H. Metzinger,
President  and  Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., hereby
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for
          the  year ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  such  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
          NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2003, fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and
          results  of  operations  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.




                                      /s/Paul H. Metzinger
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Paul H. Metzinger, Chief Executive
                                      Officer & President


Date:      September  26,  2003



     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by
NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.  and  furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
§ 11.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. ( a ) The Secretary of HHS has established, and published as a Notice in the Federal Register, a list of categories of research that may be reviewed by the IRB through an expedited review procedure. The Secretary will evaluate the list at least every 8 years and amend it, as appropriate, after consultation with other federal departments and agencies and after publication in the Federal Register for public comment. A copy of the list is available from the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office.
( b ) ( 1 ) An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review the following: ( i ) Some or all of the research appearing on the list described in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the reviewer determines that the study involves more than minimal risk;
( ii ) Minor changes in previously approved research during the period for which approval is authorized; or
( iii ) Research for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption under § 11.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7) and (8).
( 2 ) Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be carried out by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB. In reviewing the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the nonexpedited procedure set forth in § 11.108(b).
( c ) Each IRB that uses an expedited review procedure shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals that have been approved under the procedure.
( d ) The department or agency head may restrict, suspend, terminate, or choose not to authorize an institution's or IRB's use of the expedited review procedure.
§ 67.161 Validity of Certificate of Documentation. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a Certificate of Documentation but no trade endorsement thereon, issued to a vessel which is the subject of an outstanding mortgage filed or recorded in accordance with subpart Q of this part or any predecessor regulations, remains valid for purposes of: ( 1 ) 46 U.S.C. chapter 125;
( 2 ) 46 U.S.C. chapter 313 for an instrument filed or recorded before the date of invalidation, and an assignment or a notice of claim of lien filed after that date;
( 3 ) 46 U.S.C. 56101, 56102 and 57109; and
( 4 ) 46 U.S.C. 56301.
( b ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to a vessel which is subject only to a mortgage filed or recorded before January 1, 1989, which had not attained preferred status as of that date.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by USCG-2016-0531, 82 FR 43864, Sept. 20, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 114 (Thursday, June 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32919-32920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2978]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation 
will meet on June 25, 2007 via conference call. The meeting will begin 
at 2 p.m., (EDT), and continue until conclusion of the Board's agenda.

Location: 3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007, 3rd Floor 
Conference Center.

Status of Meeting: Open. Directors will participate by telephone 
conference in such a manner as to enable interested members of the 
public to hear and identify all persons participating in the meeting. 
Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so by 
joining participating staff at the location indicated above. Members of 
the public wishing to listen to the meeting by telephone should call 1-
888-282-9568 and enter 16703 on the key pad when prompted. To enhance 
the quality of your listening experience as well as that of others and 
to eliminate background noises that interfere with the audio recording 
of the proceeding, please mute your telephone during the meeting.

Matters to be Considered: 1. Approval of the agenda.
    2. Consider and act on further direction to management regarding 
the Corporation's locality pay program, previously discussed at the 
January and April 2007 Board/Committee meetings.
    3. Consider and act on other business.
    4. Public comment.
    5. Consider and act on adjournment of meeting.

Contact Person for Information: Patricia Batie, Manager of Board 
Operations, at (202) 295-1500.

Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 295-1500.


[[Page 32920]]


    Dated: June 12, 2007.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-2978 Filed 6-12-07; 3:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 98

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 98.01-3 Incorporation by reference.

(a) Certain standards and specifications are incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a). To enforce any edition other than the ones listed in paragraph (b) of this section, notice of change must be published in the Federal Register and the material made available to the public. All approved material is at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and is available from the sources indicated in paragraph (b) of this section. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(b) The standards and specifications approved for incorporation by reference in this part and the sections affected, are:

## American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT)

4153 Arlingate Road, Caller # 28518, Columbus, OH, 43228-0518

ASNT “Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A (1988), Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing” 98.25-97(c)(2)

## American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) International

Three Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016-5990

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, section V, Nondestructive Examination (1986) 98.25-97(a)(1)

[CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50965, Dec. 11, 1989, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53226, Oct. 1, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1622 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1622

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1995

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TOY HANDGUNS.

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall promulgate a rule in 
accordance with section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2058) to declare as a banned hazardous product under section 8 any toy 
which in size, shape, or overall appearance resembles a real handgun.
                                 <all>
```
```

[House Report 106-147]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    106-147

======================================================================

 
             PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1654,
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

May 18, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 174]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 174, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1654, 
the ``National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
Authorization Act of 1999,'' under an open rule. The rule 
provides one hour of general debate equally divided between the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Science.
    The rule waives points of order against consideration of 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII 
(requiring a three-day layover of the committee report). The 
rule makes in order as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Science and now printed in the 
bill.
    The rule provides that the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. The rule 
waives points of order against the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI 
(prohibiting nongermane amendments).
    The rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in 
recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in 
the Congressional Record. The rule allows for the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during 
consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five 
minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen 
minute vote. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
    The waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII is necessary because 
the Committee on Science did not file the report in the House 
until Tuesday, May 18, and the bill is expected to be 
considered on the floor on May 19. The waiver of clause 7 of 
rule XVI is necessary because section 219 of the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Science and printed in the bill is a provision 
which falls into the jurisdiction of the Committee on Education 
and the Workforce.

                                  

```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending February 6, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  May 17, 2010   /s/ Teresa A. Herbert* Teresa A. Herbert Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.   1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SEAN ANDRE WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CR-90-135, CA-97-1294-JFM)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Andre Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-90-135; CA-97-1294-JFM (D.

Md. Jan. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
§ 1150.31 Scope of exemption. ( a ) Except as indicated below, this exemption applies to all acquisitions and operations under section 10901 (*See* 1150.1, *supra*). This exemption also includes: ( 1 ) Acquisition by a noncarrier of rail property that would be operated by a third party;
( 2 ) Operation by a new carrier of rail property acquired by a third party;
( 3 ) A change in operators on the line; and
( 4 ) Acquisition of incidental trackage rights. Incidental trackage rights include the grant of trackage rights by the seller, or the assignment of trackage rights to operate over the line of a third party that occur at the time of the exempt acquisition or operation. This exemption does not apply when a class I railroad abandons a line and another class I railroad then acquires the line in a proposal that would result in a major market extension as defined at § 1180.3(c).
( b ) Other exemptions that may be relevant to a proposal under this subpart are the exemption for control at § 1180.2(d)(1) and (2), and the exemption from securities regulation at 49 CFR part 1177.
[51 FR 2504, Jan. 17, 1986, as amended at 81 FR 8855, Feb. 23, 2016]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-1119 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CLAIMS 

 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KUWAIT 

Effected by Notification 

Dated at Geneva November 19, 2002 

 

 with 

Attachment 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KUWAIT 

Claims 

 Agreement effected by notification dated 

 at Geneva November 19, 2002; 

 Entered into force November 19, 2002. 

 With attachment.
Exhibit 32.1

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

            In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFirst Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   Information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date      November 7, 2007                    /s/ T. Randy Stevens                                  

                                                              T. Randy Stevens, Chief Executive Officer 

 

Date      November 7, 2007                  /s/Patricia P. Bearden                                 

  Patricia P. Bearden, AssistantTreasurer 

  (principal financial officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE ROSE,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 5:15-CV-11963

v. HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

CATHERINE BAUMAN,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

Michigan prisoner Willie Rose (“Petitioner”) has filed a pro se petition for writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 asserting that he is incarcerated in

violation of his constitutional rights. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s

motion for appointment of counsel. In support of his motion, Petitioner states that he

is unable to afford counsel, that his ability to litigate is hampered by his imprisonment,

that his case involves complex and conflicting issues, and that he has limited legal

knowledge and access to legal materials.

Petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas

review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492 (6th

Cir. 1995); see also Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992) (citing Pennsylvania

v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)). “‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is .

. . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.’” Childs

5:15-cv-11963-JCO-APP Doc # 15 Filed 10/19/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 314
v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Madden,

352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)).

In this case, Petitioner has submitted his habeas petition, Respondent has filed

an answer to the petition and the state court record, and Petitioner has filed a reply to

that answer. The Court’s initial review of those materials indicates that the

appointment of counsel is not necessary at this time. The Court will bear in mind

Petitioner’s request if, upon a more detailed review of the pleadings, the Court

determines that appointment of counsel is necessary. Petitioner need not file an

additional motion concerning this issue. Accordingly, the Court DENIES

WITHOUT PREJUDICE Petitioner’s motion.

IT IS ORDERED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: October 19, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the

parties of record on this date, October 19, 2016, using the ECF system and/or ordinary

mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2

5:15-cv-11963-JCO-APP Doc # 15 Filed 10/19/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 315