alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centennial Bancorp
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), I, Ted R. Winnowski, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



/s/ Ted R. Winnowski
------------------------
Ted R. Winnowski
President & Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

# Date and Time:

Friday, July 13, 2007—1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Emrick Technology Center, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton, PA 18042.

The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13,  1998.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton, PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

Dated: July 3, 2007.

C. Allen Sachse,

Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-3354 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
#### § 1108.13 Additional parties per side.

Where an arbitration complaint is filed by more than one complainant in a particular arbitration proceeding against, or is answered or counterclaimed by, more than one respondent, these arbitration rules will apply to the complainants as a group and the respondents as a group in the same manner as they will apply to individual opposing parties.
§ 1018.26 Disputed debts. ( a ) A debtor who disputes a debt shall explain why the debt is incorrect in fact or law within 30 days from the date that the initial demand letter was mailed. The debtor may support the explanation by submitting affidavits, statements certified under penalty of perjury, canceled checks, or other relevant evidence.
( b ) The Board may extend the interest waiver period as described in § 1018.30(j) pending a final determination of the existence or amount of the debt.
( c ) The Board may investigate the facts involved in the dispute and if necessary, the Board may arrange for a conference at which the debtor may present evidence and arguments in support of the debtor's positions.
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40181 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f- A pp el l ee v. J OSE M ANUEL F LORE S - OCHO A , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 7: 08- C R - 781- 1 B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to represent Jose M an u elF l oresO ch oa h a s m ov ed f

or leav e to w i th d ra w an d h a s f i l ed a b ri ef i n acco rd a n ce w i th A n d er s v . C a lif

o rn ia , 386 U . S . 7 38 ( 196 7) . F l ores- O choa h as n otf i l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l os e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 7 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

EDDIE JOE BUSH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MIKE VETRANO, JANE CRUZ, and DAVID LINAM, Washington State Officials, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-1115 (D.C. 99-Z-177) (District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BALDOCK , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.2

Plaintiff-Appellant Eddie Joe Bush filed a pro se c ivil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a number of violations of his civil rights by Colorado State Prison officials. However, the m agistrate judge determined that the complaint was deficient for failing to sub mit a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C . § 1915. The magistrate, therefore, issued an order directing Mr. Bush to su bmit the proper documentation required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) & (2). The ord er warned that if Mr. Bush failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days, the action would be dismissed without prejudice. Mr. Bush submitted an uncertified copy of his priso ner trust fund account statement. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(2) requires a certif ied copy of the trust fund account statement, or institutional equivalent. Th erefore, on March 5, 1999, the district court dismissed his claim without prejudic e. The district court further denied Mr. Bush’s motion and affidavit for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, finding that the appeal was not taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Mr. Bush has filed a motion in this court to procee d in forma pauperis for this appeal, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), arguing that the uncertified account statement he submitted was “the equivalent of certified.” Aplt’s Br. at 3. There is no equivalent of certification. The statu te clearly requires a certified3

copy. Mr. Bush’s appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989) (a claim is frivolous if the factual contentions supporting it are “clearly baseless,” o r if it relies on an “indisputably meritless legal theory”). Accordingly, we DENY Mr. Bush leave to file in form a pauperis and DISMISS his appeal. The dismissal of this frivolou s appeal is a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Jennings v. Natrona County Detention Ctr. Med. Facility , 175 F.3d 775, 1999 WL 248634, at * 4 (10th Cir.1 999).

Entered for the Court,

Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.2

                    MAXUS REAL PROPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Maxus Real Property  Investors-Four,
L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, John W. Alvey,  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial and Accounting
Officer of Maxus Capital Corp.,  General  Partner of the  Partnership,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership  as of August 31,  2003 (the last date of the period  covered by the
Report).


/s/ John W. Alvey
-----------------------------
John W. Alvey
Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of
Maxus Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership
October 7, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 23, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-10884

 

**SHELTER PROPERTIESIV**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
#### § 72.20-45 Lighting.

Each berth must have a light.
#### § 90.01-15 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f), which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| § 91.27-13 | 1625-0065 |
| § 91.40-3 | 1625-0032 |
| § 91.40-5 | 1625-0032 |
| § 97.15-7 | 1625-0064 |
| § 97.15-17 | 1625-0064 |

[CGD 88-072, 53 FR 34297, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended by CGD 82-004a, 55 FR 2525, Jan. 25, 1990; CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41822, Sept. 11, 1992; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58347, Sept. 30, 2004]
§ 52.01-1 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters at: Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593-7509; phone (202) 372-1375; email *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov*. The material is available from: *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),* Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990; 800-843-2763; *CustomerCare@asme.org*; *www.asme.org*: ( a ) ASME BPVC.I-2019, 2019 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section I, Rules for Construction of Power Boilers, 2019 Edition, issued July 1, 2019 (“Section I of the ASME BPVC”); IBR approved for §§ 52.01-2; 52.01-3 introductory text and (g); 52.01-5; 52.01-50(a); 52.01-90; 52.01-95(a) and (f); 52.01-100(a) and (b); 52.01-105(a) and (b); 52.01-110(a); 52. 01-115; 52.01-120; 52.01-135(a)through (c); 52.01-140; 52.01-145; 52.05-1; 52.05-15; 52.05-20; 52.05-30; 52.05-45; 52.15-1; 52.15-5(a) and (b); 52.20-1; 52.20-25(a); 52.25-3; 52.25-5; 52.25-7; 52.25-10(a).
( b ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65160, Oct. 31, 2008, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49228, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59777, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60147, Sept. 30, 2013]
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Eat at Joe’s, Ltd., on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Joseph Fiore, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
March 31,
2009








/s/ Joseph
Fiore


Joseph
Fiore


CEO, CFO,
Chairman, Secretary, Director


(Principal
Executive & Accounting Officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bridget McGrath, *Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v.*The President, etc., of the DELAWARE and HUDSON CANAL COMPANY, *Respondents.*

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J.;

Learned, P..J-, not acting.
CARROLL.

#### Brown *v.*Wiggin.

The propriety of sending to the jury a chalk, referred to in testimony, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term.

Case, for kindling a fire on the defendant’s land so carelessly that it spread to the plaintiff’s land and consumed his timber. Subject to exception, a chalk, showing the location of places referred to in testimony, and used in the examination of witnesses, was sent to the jury after they retired to consider their verdict. Verdict for the defendant.

*Sawyer*and Copeland, for the plaintiff.

Weeks, for the defendant.

Bingham, J.

The propriety of sending the chalk to the.jury was a question of fact to bo determined at the trial term.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37514-37518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 07-27]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 07-27 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: July 3, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 37515]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY07.000


[[Page 37516]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY07.001


[[Page 37517]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY07.002


[[Page 37518]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY07.003

[FR Doc. 07-3335 Filed 7-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                     COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

       Statement Re: Computation of Net Income Per Basic and Diluted Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Weighted Average         Per Share
                                                      Net Income (loss)       Shares Outstanding          Amount
                                                      -----------------       ------------------        ---------
<S>                                                      <C>                  <C>                       <C>
Three Months Ended April 30, 2001:
    Basic                                                $   (6,555)                29,718               $  (.22)
    Dilutive effect of employee stock purchase
      awards and options                                         --                     --                    --
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------
    Diluted                                              $   (6,555)                29,718               $  (.22)
                                                      ============================================================

Three Months Ended April 30, 2000:
    Basic                                                $    1,830                 23,935               $   .08
    Dilutive effect of employee stock purchase
      awards and options(1)                                      --                  2,423                  (.01)
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------
    Diluted                                              $    1,830                 26,358               $   .07
                                                      ============================================================
</TABLE>


(1)  Potential dilutive securities, consisting of outstanding stock options and
     shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan, are included in the
     computation of diluted net income per share using the treasury stock
     method. Potential dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of
     diluted loss per share.