alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to ban

partial-birth abortions.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partialbirth abortions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1833 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partial-Birth Abortion

3 Ban Act of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting after chapter 73 the following:

7 ‘‘CHAPTER 74—PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTIONS

‘‘Sec.

‘‘1531. Partial-birth abortions prohibited.

8 ‘‘§ 1531. Partial-birth abortions prohibited

9 ‘‘(a) Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign

10 commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion

11 and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this

12 title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

13 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘partial-birth

14 abortion’ means an abortion in which the person perform15 ing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus

16 before killing the fetus and completing the delivery.

17 ‘‘(c)(1) The father, and if the mother has not at18 tained the age of 18 years at the time of the abortion,

19 the maternal grandparents of the fetus, may in a civil ac20 tion obtain appropriate relief, unless the pregnancy re21 sulted from the plaintiff’s criminal conduct or the plaintiff

22 consented to the abortion.
3

•HR 1833 EH

1 ‘‘(2) Such relief shall include—

2 ‘‘(A) money damages for all injuries, psycho3 logical and physical, occasioned by the violation of

4 this section; and

5 ‘‘(B) statutory damages equal to three times

6 the cost of the partial-birth abortion.

7 ‘‘(d) A woman upon whom a partial-birth abortion

8 is performed may not be prosecuted under this section,

9 for a conspiracy to violate this section, or for an offense

10 under section 2, 3, or 4 of this title based on a violation

11 of this section.

12 ‘‘(e) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution or

13 a civil action under this section, which must be proved by

14 a preponderance of the evidence, that the partial-birth

15 abortion was performed by a physician who reasonably be16 lieved—

17 ‘‘(1) the partial-birth abortion was necessary to

18 save the life of the mother; and

19 ‘‘(2) no other procedure would suffice for that

20 purpose.’’.

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

22 for part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by
4

•HR 1833 EH

1 inserting after the item relating to chapter 73 the follow2 ing new item:

‘‘74. Partial-birth abortions ........................................................... 1531’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 1,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVIALL,
INC.'S SECOND QUARTER 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SECOND QUARTER 1997 FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,287
<INVENTORY>                                     75,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,774
<PP&E>                                          39,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,161
<BONDS>                                         33,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           197
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,077
<SALES>                                        187,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,745
<CGS>                                          140,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,970
<INCOME-TAX>                                       900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 9.4 Waiting time; actual report for duties.

Extra compensation for *waiting time* will not be allowed unless and until an officer or employee actually reports for duty.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1880

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 102 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ‘‘Edward

Madigan Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1880 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at 102

3 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

8 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post

10 Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
#### Temple Grove Seminary *v.*Louis H. Cramer, *Receiver, etc*.

Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted and cause certified.

Boches, J., not acting.
§ 1570.7 Security responsibilities of employees and other persons. ( a ) No person may— ( 1 ) Tamper or interfere with, compromise, modify, attempt to circumvent, or cause another person to tamper or interfere with, compromise, modify, or attempt to circumvent any security measure implemented under this subchapter.
( 2 ) Enter, or be present within, a secured or restricted area without complying with the security measures applied as required under this subchapter to control access to, or presence or movement in, such areas.
( 3 ) Use, allow to be used, or cause to be used, any approved access medium or identification medium that authorizes the access, presence, or movement of persons or vehicles in secured or restricted areas in any other manner than that for which it was issued by the appropriate authority to meet the requirements of this subchapter.
( b ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to conducting inspections or tests to determine compliance with this subchapter authorized by— ( 1 ) TSA and DHS officials working with TSA; or
( 2 ) The owner/operator when acting in accordance with the procedures described in a security plan and/or program approved by TSA.
98-2289.

#### State v. Keirns.

Lucas App. No. L-97-1414. *Sun sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., not participating.
#### In the Matter of the Attorney-General, *v.*The Atlantic Mutual Life Insurance Company.

— Order confirming report of Cowen, referee, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 106.110 Appealing a PHMSA Action. You may appeal the following PHMSA actions: ( a ) PHMSA's issuance of a final rule or PHMSA's withdrawal of a notice of proposed rulemaking under the rulemaking procedures in this part. However, you may appeal PHMSA's issuance of a direct final rule only if you previously filed comments to the direct final rule (see § 106.40(e)).
( b ) Any PHMSA decision on a petition for rulemaking.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending October 13, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1503.429 Filing of documents with the Enforcement Docket Clerk. ( a ) *General.* This section governs filing of documents with the Enforcement Docket Clerk when required under this part.
( b ) *Type of service.* A person must file a document with the Enforcement Docket Clerk by delivering two copies of the document as follows: ( 1 ) By personal delivery or mail, to United States Coast Guard (USCG) ALJ Docketing Center, ATTN: Enforcement Docket Clerk, at the address specified in § 1503.413(c)(3).
( 2 ) By electronic mail, to *ALJdocket@ALJBalt.USCG.MIL .* If this e-mail address changes, TSA will provide notice of the change by notice in the Federal Register.
( 3 ) By facsimile transmission, to 410-962-1746. If this number changes, TSA will provide notice of the change by notice in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Contents.* Unless otherwise specified in this part, each document must contain a short, plain statement of the facts supporting the person's position and a brief statement of the action requested in the document. Each document must be typewritten or legibly handwritten.
( d ) *Date of filing.* The date of filing will be as follows: ( 1 ) The date of personal delivery.
( 2 ) If mailed, the mailing date stated on the certificate of service, the date shown on the postmark if there is no certificate of service, or other mailing date shown by other evidence if there is no certificate of service or postmark.
( 3 ) If sent by electronic mail or facsimile transmission, the date of transmission.
( e ) *Service of documents filed with the Enforcement Docket.* A person must serve a copy of any document filed with the Enforcement Docket on each party and the ALJ or the chief ALJ if no judge has been assigned to the proceeding at the time of filing. Service on a party's attorney of record or a party's designated representative is service on the party.
§ 1018.70 Prompt referral. ( a ) A claim which requires enforced collection is referred to GAO or DOJ for litigation. A referral is made as early as possible consistent with aggressive collection action and, in, any event, well within the time required to bring a timely suit against the debtor. Ordinarily, referrals are made within 1 year of the Board's final determination of the fact and the amount of the debt.
( b ) When the merits of the Board's claim, the amount owed on the claim, or the propriety of acceptance of a proposed compromise, suspension, or termination of collection actions is in doubt, the Board shall refer the matter to GAO for resolution and instruction prior to proceeding with collection actions and/or referral to DOJ for litigation.
( c ) The Board may refer a claim to GAO or DOJ even though the termination of collection activity might otherwise be given consideration under § 1018.63 if: ( 1 ) A significant enforcement policy is involved in reducing a statutory penalty or forfeiture to judgment; or
( 2 ) Recovery of a judgment is a prerequisite to the imposition of administrative sanctions, such as suspension or revocation of a license or privilege of participating in a Government sponsored program.
( d ) Once a claim has been referred to GAO or DOJ under this subpart, the Board shall refrain from any contact with the debtor and shall direct the debtor to GAO or DOJ as appropriate, when questions concerning the claim are raised by the debtor. The Board shall immediately advise GAO or DOJ, as appropriate, of any payments by the debtor.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF Iwerks Entertainment, Inc.



       Cinetropolis, Inc., a California corporation

       Iwerks Touring Technologies, Inc. (previously Portable Turbo Tour, Inc.),
              a California corporation

       Iwerks Attractions & Technologies, Inc. (previously Iwerks Entertainment,
              Inc.), a California corporation

       Omni Films International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

       OFI Technology, Inc., a Florida corporation

       Discovery Theaters San Francisco Corp., a California corporation

       Cinetropolis Management, Inc., a California corporation

       Iwerks Projectors Marketing, Inc., a California corporation

       Iwerks Linear Loop Projectors, Inc., a California corporation

       Iwerks Production Company, a California corporation

       Iwerks Story Development Company, a California corporation
§ 1244.5 Date of filing. ( a ) The reporting period for which subject railroads submit waybill sample information shall be the audit (accounting) month except that subject railroads may submit waybill sample information quarterly as specified in Statement No. 81-1.
( b ) Waybill sample information shall be forwarded no later than 60 days from the end of the reporting period to the Board.
( c ) When the submitted waybill sample information is returned to the submitting railroad for correction, that railroad shall resubmit corrected data to the Board promptly but no later than 60 days after its receipt.
( d ) Subject railroads shall complete the Transmittal Form OPAD-1 to accompany each waybill file submission.
[46 FR 26784, May 15, 1981. Redesignated at 65 FR 37711, June 16, 2000; 85 FR 54941, Sept. 3, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                    906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  the  undersigned  officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2004                      /s/ Emile A. Battat
                                            ----------------------------
                                                Emile A. Battat
                                                Chief Executive Officer

     The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C.ss.1350
and not for any other purpose.



                                       19
*Wednesday, December 9, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

97-1502.

#### Freshwater v. Scheidt.

Paulding App. No. 11-96-10. This cause is pending before the comí; as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Paulding County. Upon consideration of appellants’ notice of lifting of the automatic stay in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the stay previously granted by this court be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that any appellee briefs shall be filed within thirty days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
#### State *v.*Falconer.

In an indictment, under Gen. Laws, c. 275, *s.*1, for obtaining by false pretences an acquittance of an attachment, the description of the acquittance must show that it was in writing.

Indictment, under Gen. Laws, *c.*275, *s.*1, for obtaining by false pretences an acquittance of an attachment. Motion to quash the indictment because it does not allege that the acquittance was in writing.

*Copeland,*and *Currier,*for the defendant.

*The Solicitor,*for the state.

Doe, C. J.

The acquittance intended by the statute is a written one; and the description in the indictment does not show that the acquittance alleged to have been obtained by the defendant was in writing.

*Indictment quashed.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                TO ANNUAL REPORT
                                                                    ON FORM 20-F

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") is filing with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report").

                  I, Joseph Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge;

                  (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Joseph Li
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Joseph Li
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                March 10, 2004

                                        1
#### Thomas Powell *v.*The Pittsburg, Cincinnati and St. Louis Railroad Company.

Motion for leave to file a petition in error.

*Pugh, Throop & Brannan,*for the motion:

*Jones*v. *Vorhees,*10 Ohio, 145 ; *Davidson*v. *Graham, 2*Ohio St. 136; 6 How. 344, 383; *Veach*v. *Elliott,*1 Ohio St. 139;, *Hoss*v. *Layton,*3 Ohio St. 352.

*Matthews, Pamsey § Matthews,*contra:

*Jordon*v. *Norton,*4 M. & W. 154; *Grace*v. *Adams,*100 Mass. 505; *Muller*v. *C. M. & D. R. R. Co., 2*Sup. Ct. Rep. (Cinti.) 280, and authorities cited. *Pier*v. *Finch,*24 Barb. 514; *Johnson*v. *Concord R. R. Co.,*46 N. H. 213 ; *Boston R. R.*v. *Proctor,*1 Allen, 268; *Barker*v. *Cloflin,*31 Barb. 557.

By the Court.

Where a railroad company sold a ticket,, which, entitled the purchaser to ride upon its cars a certain number of times within a given period, for a price below the usual rate of fare, which ticket specified upon its face that it was only good during such period, the purchaser,, having failed to ride the specified number of times within the period named, is not entitled to ride upon such ticket after the expiration of the period.

*Motion overruled.*
#### Sarah Seaman, *Respondent, v.*Mary E. Williams, *Appellant*.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
§ 11.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Officers Certification

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC) that the Quarterly Report of DPC on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of DPC at the end of such period and
the results of its operations for such period.

|                      |  |                                         
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated August 12, 2002 |  | /S/ Michael Ziering                     
|                      |  |                                         
|                      |  | Michael Ziering, Chief Executive Officer
|                     
|                      |  | /S/ James L. Brill                      
|                      |  |                                         
|                      |  | James L. Brill, Chief Financial Officer 

14