alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     Request for State Data Needed to Determine the Amount of a Tribal Family Assistance Grant. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0173. *Description:*42 U.S.C. 612 (Section 412 of the Social Security Act) gives federally recognized Indian Tribes the opportunity to apply to operate a Tribal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. The Act specifies that the Secretary shall use State-submitted data to determine the amount of the grant to the Tribe. This form (letter) is used to request those data from the States. ACF is proposing to extend this information collection without change. *Respondents:*
                     States that have Indian Tribes applying to operate a TANIF program. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average 
                             burden hours per response
Total burden hoursRequest for State Data Needed to Determine the Amount of a Tribal Family Assistance Grant
15
1
42
630
 
 
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     630. *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, FAX: 202-395-6974, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Dated: June 14, 2007. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 07-3004 Filed 6-18-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000830319
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM III - SERIES 6, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4822
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42089
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               50165
<PP&E>                                         2759590
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2498851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          76753
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     234151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310904
<SALES>                                        366174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366174
<CGS>                                          450677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  501752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               51075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (97759)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 12

                      Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                ($ in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                                                            May 31,                        May 31,
                                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     1998            1997            1998           1997
                                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>          
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes               $    (40,108)  $    (327,836)  $    (16,747)   $   (320,485)
Add:
   Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                5,272           2,608         10,407          10,280
   Interest on indebtedness, including amortization
      of deferred financing charges                                     31,777          11,293         61,266          29,922
                                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
Income as adjusted                                                $     (3,059)  $    (313,935)  $     54,926    $   (280,283)
                                                                ===============================================================


Fixed charges:
   Portion of rents representative of the interest factor         $      5,272           2,608         10,407          10,280
   Interest on indebtedness, including amortization
      of deferred financing charges                                     31,777          11,293         61,266          29,922
                                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
   Total fixed charges                                            $     37,049  $       13,901  $      71,673   $      40,202
                                                                ===============================================================


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                      (0.08)x        (22.58)x          0.77x         (6.97)x
                                                                ===============================================================

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


In connection with the Annual Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Randi Swatt, acting Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her
knowledge and belief:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:   March 31, 2005

                                    Signed: /s/ Randi Swatt
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Acting Chief Financial Officer
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1736.

#### Hardy v. Country Club Acres, Inc.

Hancock App. No. 59803. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellants’ application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
§ 11.108 IRB functions and operations. ( a ) In order to fulfill the requirements of this policy each IRB shall: ( 1 ) Have access to meeting space and sufficient staff to support the IRB's review and recordkeeping duties;
( 2 ) Prepare and maintain a current list of the IRB members identified by name; earned degrees; representative capacity; indications of experience such as board certifications or licenses sufficient to describe each member's chief anticipated contributions to IRB deliberations; and any employment or other relationship between each member and the institution, for example, full-time employee, part-time employee, member of governing panel or board, stockholder, paid or unpaid consultant;
( 3 ) Establish and follow written procedures for: ( i ) Conducting its initial and continuing review of research and for reporting its findings and actions to the investigator and the institution;
( ii ) Determining which projects require review more often than annually and which projects need verification from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review; and
( iii ) Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and for ensuring that investigators will conduct the research activity in accordance with the terms of the IRB approval until any proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the IRB, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject.
( 4 ) Establish and follow written procedures for ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB; appropriate institutional officials; the department or agency head; and the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office, or the equivalent office within the appropriate Federal department or agency of ( i ) Any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others or any serious or continuing noncompliance with this policy or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; and
( ii ) Any suspension or termination of IRB approval.
( b ) Except when an expedited review procedure is used (as described in § 11.110), an IRB must review proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRB are present, including at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. In order for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of those members present at the meeting.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                          59,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      34,507,224
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,277,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,779,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          838,728
<BONDS>                                     17,026,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,267,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,779,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,982,017
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,495,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,719,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,299,792)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,299,792)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,483,064
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (816,728)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (31.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00227-CV

EDNA MASONIC LODGE #767

v.

DAMON MOORE THE CHIEF APPRAISER JACKSON

CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

On Appeal from the

267th District Court of Jackson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TAX08832

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment and dismisses the case. The Court orders the 

judgment VACATED and the appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal will be taxed 

against the party incurring the same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 6, 2023
§ 1011.1 General. ( a ) This part describes the organization of the Board, and the assignment of jurisdiction and the responsibilities to the Board, individual Board Members or employees, and employee boards.
( b ) As used in this part, *matter* includes any case, proceeding, question, or other matter within the Board's jurisdiction; and *decision* includes any decision, ruling, order, or requirement of the Board, an individual Board Member or employee, or an employee board.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ RICHARD S. HENDERSON , Claimant

- Appellant,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI , SECRETARY OF VETERAN S AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

__________________________
2012

- 7 1 72

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10

- 3934, Chief Judge Bruce E. Kasold

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________
P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and summarily affirm the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Case: 12-7172 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 03/01/2013RICHARD HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI 2
We deem it the better course to deny the motion and for the Se cretary of Veteran’s Affairs to present any arguments for dismissal in his brief

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : ( 1 ) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ motion to di smiss is denied

. (2) Henderson’s brief is due 30 days from the date of this order

.
F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 26 Case: 12-7172 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 03/01/2013
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 11, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

518 

CAF 13-00003 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF TERRANCE MACK, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

KAYLA GRIFFIN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

SHIRLEY A. GORMAN, BROCKPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

TANYA J. CONLEY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROCHESTER. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joseph

G. Nesser, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition for

visitation. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 16, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1511.5 Imposition of Aviation Security Infrastructure Fees. ( a ) Effective February 18, 2002, an Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee will be imposed on air carriers and foreign air carriers engaged in air transportation.
( b ) The amount of the Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee for each fiscal year will not exceed, in the aggregate, the amounts paid in calendar year 2000 by air carriers and foreign air carriers for the screening of passengers and property transported by passenger aircraft in the United States, as determined by the Administrator.
( c ) For fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004, the amount of the Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee imposed on each air carrier and foreign air carrier will not exceed the amount each such carrier paid for the screening of passengers and property transported by passenger aircraft in the United States during calendar year 2000, as determined by the Administrator.
( d ) Each air carrier and foreign air carrier that paid for the screening of passengers and property in calendar year 2000 must fully complete the form set forth in Appendix A to this part titled, “Calendar Year 2000 Costs Paid for Passenger and Property Screening,” and submit the completed form to the Transportation Security Administration by May 18, 2002.
( e ) In the case of a merger, acquisition, corporate restructuring, reorganization, or name change involving an air carrier or foreign air carrier that paid for the screening of passengers and property transported by passenger aircraft in the United States during calendar year 2000, the successor entity must include those screening costs in Appendix A of this part and submit those costs together with its own costs on one form in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. Any other air carrier or foreign air carrier that paid for the screening of passengers and property transported by passenger aircraft in the United States during calendar year 2000 but is no longer providing air transportation must also complete the form set forth in Appendix A and submit the form in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( f ) The Administrator has determined that the information submitted pursuant to this part and 49 U.S.C. 44940(a)(2)(B) is Sensitive Security Information and is subject to the non-disclosure requirements of 49 U.S.C. 40119(b).
( g ) The amount of the Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee imposed on each air carrier and foreign air carrier will be redetermined for fiscal years 2005 and beyond, and such redeterminations may be based on the carrier's respective market share or any other appropriate measure in lieu of the measure provided in paragraph (c) of this section.