alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 22, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, July 12, 1995 (93), Para 93.15 Recorded Vote]
[Page 1117]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.93.15  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. KLUG:

       Page 29, line 1, strike ``$103,339,000'' and insert ``$0''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

144

negative

Nays

284
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending May 16, 2009

----

EnforcementDresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt, Germany, and its New York, New York branch  -- cease and desist order dated November 7, 2008, terminated May 11, 2009.					-Announced, May 13, 2009 					First Mutual Bancorp of Illinois, Inc., Harvey, Illinois  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.					-Announced, May 14, 2009 					Security Bank Corporation, Macon, Georgia, and Security Interim Holding Corporation  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Banking Commissioner of the State of Georgia.					-Announced, May 12, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: May 21, 2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 10, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, June 6, 1995 (74), Para 74.4 Communication from the Clerk--Message from the Senate]
[Page 823]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.74.4  communication from the clerk--message from the senate

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EVERETT, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, June 5, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     The Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 5 of Rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, the Clerk received the following message 
     from the Secretary of the Senate on Wednesday, May 31, 1995 
     at 3:30 p.m.: that the Senate agreed to the conference report 
     on H.R. 1158.
           With warm regards,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
                             Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned officer of National Penn Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended  September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  November
7,
2008
 /s/ Glenn E.
Moyer
 Name:  Glenn E.
Moyer
 Title:    President
and
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not for any other
purpose.
 
  44
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 1, 2011

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|SUSQUEHANNA BANK                      | * Branch       | Susquehanna Bank, to establish a branch office located at 203 International Drive, Hunt Valley, Baltimore County, MD.        | Newspaper:01/03/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | 01/03/2011    
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable
|WARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P. | CIC            | Warburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P., New York, NY, to acquire up to 19.7% of National Penn Bancshares, Inc, Boyertown, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/08/2010 
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | 12/08/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                    | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|LANDMARK CMNTY BK, PITTSTON, PENNSYLVANIA | 2963547 | 06/21/2010 | 12/14/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 3


Amendment to Bylaws as approved at the December 15, 1997 Board meeting of CFW
Communications Company:

Article II, Section 2.6 (Eligibility for Service as a Director) of the
Corporation's Bylaws is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted
in its place:

2.6 Eligibility for Service as a Director. No person who shall have attained the
age of 70 years shall be eligible for election as a Director of the Corporation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any person who is serving as a Director of the
Company and who was serving as a Director of Clifton Forge-Waynesboro Telephone
Company on April 28, 1986 who had attained the age of 70 on such date shall be
eligible for election and to serve until reaching age 80, whereupon such person
shall retire, and any person who on such date had attained the age of 60 but was
under the age of 70 shall be eligible for election and to serve until reaching
age 75, whereupon such person shall retire.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. section1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Friess, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



BY(Signautre)                         /s/ Michael Friess
(Name and Title)                      Michael Friess, President,
                                      Chief  Executive Officer
(Date)                                February 13, 2007








                                       13
#### § 1.31 Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy.

The Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy provides policy advice to the Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, and the Under Secretary. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy is responsible for: Public policy development, coordination, and evaluation for all aspects of transportation, except in the areas of aviation and international affairs, with the goal of making the Nation's transportation resources function as an integrated national system; evaluation of private transportation sector operating and economic issues; evaluation of public transportation sector operating and economic issues; regulatory and legislative initiatives and review; energy, environmental, disability, and safety policy and program development and review; and transportation infrastructure assessment and review. For delegations to the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, see § 1.25a(a).
1

NO. 12-21-00033-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BRIAN CRAIG STEVENSON, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 321ST 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate

rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a 

specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--

at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas

Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may 

enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days’ notice, an

appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement 

of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other 

action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

On March 2, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Brian Craig Stevenson, that 

the filing fee in this appeal is due and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was 

not paid on or before March 12. The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellant has
2

not responded to this Court’s notice, paid the filing fee, or otherwise shown that he is excused 

from paying the fee.1

 

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All pending motions are overruled as moot.

Opinion delivered March 19, 2021.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Appellant is acting pro se; however, pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys 

and must comply with all applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair 

advantage over parties represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P., No. 12-16-00189-CV, 2017 

WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 (Tex. App.—Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 19, 2021

NO. 12-21-00033-CV

BRIAN CRAIG STEVENSON,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 321st District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 13-0825-D)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6780

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-6878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-7157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
2

versus

JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-100)

Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 7, 2003

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s orders

denying his application for injunctions and a court order, denying

his petition for modification of sentence, and denying his

application to appear before the grand jury. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

orders of the district court. See United States v. Ellerbe, No.

CR-97-100 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2003; Mar. 27, 2003; June 20, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00683-CR

Dwayne PERKINS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 293451

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 9, 2009

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant was sentenced on August 20, 2009. No timely motion for new trial having been

filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than September 20, 2009. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.2. The notice of appeal was not filed until October 20, 2009, and no motion for

extension of time was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
04-09-00683-CR

-2-

Appellant has not responded to this court’s order for appellant to show cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a

criminal conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.3d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties IV Limited Partnership 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000702174
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       44
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          59,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,283)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         24,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,944
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,534
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        56
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.234 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.235 Filed 12/12/16 Page 2 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.236 Filed 12/12/16 Page 3 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.237 Filed 12/12/16 Page 4 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.238 Filed 12/12/16 Page 5 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.239 Filed 12/12/16 Page 6 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.240 Filed 12/12/16 Page 7 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.241 Filed 12/12/16 Page 8 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.242 Filed 12/12/16 Page 9 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.243 Filed 12/12/16 Page 10 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.244 Filed 12/12/16 Page 11 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.245 Filed 12/12/16 Page 12 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.246 Filed 12/12/16 Page 13 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.247 Filed 12/12/16 Page 14 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.248 Filed 12/12/16 Page 15 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.249 Filed 12/12/16 Page 16 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.250 Filed 12/12/16 Page 17 of 18
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 31-11, PageID.251 Filed 12/12/16 Page 18 of 18
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 16, 1995 (46), Para 46.7 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 394-395]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.46.7  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the preferential motion submitted by Mr. OBEY that the 
Commit

[[Page 395]]

tee do now rise and report the bill back to the House with the 
recommendation that the enacting clause be stricken out.

It was decided in the

Yeas

187

negative

Nays

228
```
§ 1242.71 Joint facility—debit and credit (accounts 37-52-00 and 38-52-00). ( a ) Solely related freight and passenger service debit expenses accounts shall be assigned according to the use made of each facility by the reporting carriers, regardless of the use made of the facility by other carriers. Common debit expenses shall be separated on the basis of the percentage separation of the solely related expenses. If there are no solely related expenses or if the solely related expenses are assigned entirely to freight or passenger service, separate common expenses on the same percentages calculated for the separation of administration (account XX-52-01).
( b ) Separate common credit expense accounts on the basis of the percentages calculated for the separation of administration (account XX-51-01).