alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Author: ICF International and Abt Associates Inc.

Date Created:6/24/2010 Date Modified:5/10/2011 Purpose:Provides information on which 316(b) Electric Generators are modeled in IPM

and w hy certain in-scope Electric Generators are not modeled. (CBI) File Contents: WorksheetContents ToAbt Provides information on which 316(b) Electric Generators are modeled in IPM

and w hy certain in-scope Electric Generators are not modeled. Input Files: External data used in calculations/analysis: None The original version of this file contains, or is linked to a file that contains, confidential business information (CBI), or information that could be used to reveal CBI. As a result, the values for any variables determined by EPA to be CBI, or that could be used to reveal CBI, have been concealed. FileInfo 1 of 12List of Facilities Provided by Abt for Disaggregating in IPM EIA ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 2 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 3 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 4 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 5 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 6 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 7 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 8 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 9 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 10 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 11 of 12EIA

ID Facility Name Facilities modeled in EPA 302_EISA

_3e? Notes ToAbt 12 of 12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT D. GATES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 374 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT D. GATES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 375 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT D. GATES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 376 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[374 WAL 2021, 375 WAL 2021 and 376 WAL 2021] - 2

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

VIP TRUCK CENTER, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH 

AMERICA, a/k/a VOLVO GROUP 

NORTH AMERICA, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 15-cv-12381 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

ORDER TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE 

AND SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE 

The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Joint Motion to Hold Case in 

Abeyance (the “Joint Motion”) and being fully advised of the premises and reasons 

therefor, HEREBY FINDS: 

that the parties have shown good cause for the relief requested in the Joint 

Motion; 

that the relief requested in the Joint Motion will save valuable resources of 

the Court and of the parties, help preserve the business reputations and goodwill of 

both parties during this contested, public proceeding, and enhance the likelihood of 

settlement through direct negotiations; 

that the requested abeyance will further the interests of judicial economy and 

will allow the parties to focus their efforts on settlement rather than on discovery 

2:15-cv-12381-MFL-MJH Doc # 28 Filed 06/28/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 330
Page 2 of 2

and trial preparation; and 

THEREFORE, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion; and 

HEREBY ORDERS that the above-captioned matter shall be held in 

abeyance and all case deadlines, including those established by the Case 

Management Requirements and Scheduling Order [Doc. #13] and any amendments 

thereto, shall be stayed from the date of this Order up to and including September 

30, 2016. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a telephonic 

status conference with the Court on Monday, October 3, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. The 

parties shall join the conference call by using the following call-in information: 

Call-In #: 215.446.3649 

Access Code: 8390969 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 28, 2016 

2:15-cv-12381-MFL-MJH Doc # 28 Filed 06/28/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 331
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending November 5, 2011

|Filer                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|OHIO VALLEY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | * Branch       | Ohio Valley Financial Group, Henderson, Kentucky, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1020 North Burkhardt Road, Evansville, Indiana. | Newspaper:11/14/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | 11/14/2011    
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11 / 7/14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** 

### Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with External Stakeholder Group **SUMMARY :**  

### EPA Region 4 discussed the Clean Power Plan with a group of external stakeholders at the EPA Region 4 office in Atlanta, GA, on 0 6 / 12 /2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.
**ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Beverly Banister, EPA Region 4 ; Todd Rinck , EPA Region 4 ; Jeaneanne Gettle , EPA Region 4 ; Carol Kemker, EPA Region 4 ; Gregg Worley , EPA Region 4 ; Bryan Myers , EPA Region 4 ; Peter Tsirigotis, OAQPS **External Stakeholders** Abby Schwimmer, Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance; Alan Hancock, Conservation Voters of South Carolina; Angela Garrone, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy; Ashten Bailey, GreenLaw; Jennette Gayer, Environment Georgia; Tanish a Thomas, Environment Georgia; Estefani Gallegos, Environment Georgia; Kate McGregor Mosley, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light; Kevin Kelly, Southface E nergy Institute; Kurt Ebersbach, Southern Environmental Law Center; Luis Martinez, Natural Resources Defense Council; Rudi Navarra, Sou theast Climate & Energy Network; Seth Gunning, Georgia Sierra Club; Stephan Smith, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy; Susan Berryman
- Rodriguez, Mothers & Others for Clean Air/American Lung Association of the Southeast
98-2227.

#### State v. Childs.

Montgomery App. No. 16325. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 98-2462, *supra.*

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
Madison Park Contract






October 9, 2013


Madison Park, LLC
100 S Pointe Drive, TH-10
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to that certain Advisory Services Agreement, effective October 1, 2012, between EZCORP, Inc. a Delaware corporation (“EZCORP”), and Madison Park, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Madison Park”), regarding certain advisory services to be rendered by Madison Park to EZCORP (such agreement being referred to herein as the “Agreement”).
This letter will serve as confirmation of our mutual agreement and understanding that the term of the Agreement has been extended to September 30, 2014.  Accordingly, the engagement described in the Agreement shall be deemed to have continued effective October 1, 2013, and shall continue, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement (including the provisions regarding compensation and payments), until September 30, 2014.
Sincerely,
EZCORP, INC.


By:    /s/ THOMAS H. WELCH, JR.        
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.,
Senior Vice President,
     General Counsel and Secretary
Acknowledged and agreed:
MADISON PARK, LLC


By:    /s/ TIM JUGMANS
Tim Jugmans,
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                          MICROFINANCIAL, INCORPORATED
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     Richard F. Latour, President and Chief Executive Officer of MicroFinancial,
Incorporated, (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Covered Report") and, excepts as corrected or
supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

          (1) the Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has signed this Certification as of this
March 30, 2003.

                                                 /s/ RICHARD F. LATOUR
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[House Report 107-136]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-136

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 36, 
  CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AUTHORIZING THE CONGRESS TO PROHIBIT THE 
  PHYSICAL DESECRATION OF THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES

                                _______
                                

   July 12 (legislative day, July 11), 2001.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 189]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 189, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint 
Resolution 36, Constitutional Amendment Authorizing the 
Congress to Prohibit the Physical Desecration of the Flag of 
the United States, under a modified closed rule. The rule 
provides two hours of debate in the House equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary.
    The rule makes in order an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute, if offered by Representative Conyers or his 
designee, which shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided between the proponent and an opponent. Finally, 
the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.

                                  

```
Exhibit
32.1




Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Berliner Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), does
hereby certify that:





The
Transition Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2009
(the “Transition
Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and the information contained in the Transition Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ C. Scott
      HiseyC.
      Scott HiseyChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/ Ronald J.
      LejmanRonald
      J. LejmanChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





March 31,
2010





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report
or as a separate disclosure document.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Berliner Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Berliner
Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### § 1.11 Overview.

This subpart sets forth the OST's key responsibilities, its basic organizational structure, and the line of Secretarial succession in time of need. It also describes the key responsibilities of OST officials, and sets forth delegations and reservations of authority to those officials.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending March 13, 2010

|Filer                                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE FEDERATION, THE | FBSEA          | National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Seoul, Korea, to establish a representative office in New York, New York. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
8040.5

# !;AA,- 2010- 070 J

Contacts. Withwhom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Colli 

# - Regional Airline Association Da\'e Loiterer



### ~ Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Roberl Hadunan



# --- ATA Craig Fabian 

# -- ATA M Lopez ./' 09129/06
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of QLT Inc., or the Company, on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, or the Form 10-K, I, Robert L. Butchofsky,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: February 28, 2007

                                   /s/ Robert L. Butchofsky
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   Robert L. Butchofsky
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
                                   QLT Inc.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 24, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2008 (January 1, 2008 - March 31, 2008)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending February 4, 2012

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY | * Branch       | Manufacturers and Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, to establish a branch office located at 1420 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Washington, DC ("Georgetown Branch" RSSD ID 4370224). | Newspaper:02/09/2012Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                              | 02/09/2012    
|Federal Register:                       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1603

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to correct mistakes which

inadvertently included certain ferries operating between Portland, Maine,

and Nova Scotia under the excise tax on the transportation of passengers

by water as opposed to the actual intent which was to tax voyages

the primary purpose of which is gambling.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1995

Mr. LONGLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to correct

mistakes which inadvertently included certain ferries operating between Portland, Maine, and Nova Scotia under

the excise tax on the transportation of passengers by

water as opposed to the actual intent which was to

tax voyages the primary purpose of which is gambling.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR TRANSPORTATION ON CER4 TAIN FERRIES.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subparagraph (B) of section

6 4472(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

•HR 1603 IH

1 to exception for certain voyages on passenger vessels) is

2 amended to read as follows:

3 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN VOY4 AGES.—The term ‘covered voyage’ shall not in5 clude—

6 ‘‘(i) a voyage of a passenger vessel of

7 less than 12 hours between 2 ports in the

8 United States, and

9 ‘‘(ii) a voyage of less than 12 hours

10 on a ferry between a port in the United

11 States and a port outside the United

12 States.

13 For purposes of the preceding sentence, the

14 term ‘ferry’ means any vessel if normally no

15 more than 50 percent of the passengers on any

16 voyage of such vessel return to the port where

17 such voyage began on the 1st return of such

18 vessel to such port.’’

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

20 subsection (a) shall apply to voyages beginning after De21 cember 31, 1989; except that—

22 (1) no refund of any tax paid before the date

23 of the enactment of this Act shall be made by reason

24 of such amendment, and
3

•HR 1603 IH

1 (2) any tax collected from the passenger before

2 the date of the enactment of this Act shall be remit3 ted to the United States.

Æ