T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AT R I NE L AL E NO H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73413 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 089- 852 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A tr i ne L a l e noh, na t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd r e l i e f u n d e rth e Co n v e n t i o n A g a i n s tTo rtu r e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73413 2 § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo l egal fi nd i ng s and re vi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e d e n yL a l e n o h ’ s p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s f i ndi ng tha tL a l e noh di d not s u f f e rp a s t p e r s e c u tio n . Se e i d. a t1059- 60. W hi l e he re xpe r i e nc e s i nc l ude , a m ong othe rthi ngs , a tt e ndi ng s e ve r a l c hur c he s tha tw e r e l a t e rburne d orde s tr oy e d a nd be i ng thr e a t e ne d byabus i ne s s c om pe t i t or , ar e a s onabl e f a c t - f i nde rw oul d notbe c o m p e lle dto f

in dth a t th e yr o s e to th e le v e l o f p e r s e c u tio n . See H

al i m v. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d9 7 1 , 9 7 5 - 7 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; c f. B a b a lla h v . A s h c r o

ft , 367 F . 3d 1067, 10 74 -76 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( re cogn i zi ng ec on om i c per se cut i on w here se vere h arassm en t , th reat s, p h ysi cal v i o l en ce, an dd i scri m i n at i o n m ad e i tal m o st i m pos s i bl e f

orpe t i t i one rt o e a rn al i vi ng) . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the a g e n c y ’s f

in d in g th a t e v e n u n d e rad is f a v o r e dg r o up a n a ly s is , L a le n o h f a ile dto es t abl i sh a r i sk of i nd i vi du al i ze d h arm suff i ci entt o d em on stra t e aw el l -f ou nd ed f e a ro f p e r s e c u tio n . Se e H

a lim , 5 9 0 F . 3 dat9 7 8 -8 0 . H er asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. B e c aus e L a l e noh c oul d notm e e the rbur de n of e s t abl i s hi ng e l i gi bi l i tyf or a s y l um , the a ge nc yc orr e c t l yf ound s he c oul d notm e e tthe he a vi e rbur de n of q u a lif y in g f o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ).10- 73413 3 F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef b e c au s e L a le n o h f

a ile dto e s tab lis h it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t s h e w ill b e to rtu r e dif s h e r e tu rn s to I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1067- 68. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.