alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on July 11, 2007, starting at 8 a.m. at the Deschutes National Forest Supervisor's Office at 1001 SW. Emkay Drive, Bend, Oregon, for a field trip to the Bend-Ft. Rock and Crescent Ranger Districts. The purpose of the trip is to monitor the Dilman and Five Buttes Projects to obtain feedback from members. The trip is scheduled to end at 5 p.m. in Bend. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public and an open public forum is scheduled from 3 to 3:30 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mollie Chaudet, Province Liaison, Deschutes NF, 1001 SW.  Emkay Drive, Bend, Oregon, 97702, Phone (541) 383-5517.

Leslie A.C. Weldon,

Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-3061 Filed 6-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 7.155 Cape Spencer, AK to Cape St. Elias, AK. ( a ) A line drawn from the westernmost extremity of Harbor Point to the southernmost extremity of LaChaussee Spit at Lituya Bay.
( b ) A line drawn from Ocean Cape Light to latitude 59°31.9′ N. longitude 139°57.1′ W. (Yakutat Bay Entrance Lighted Whistle Buoy “2”); thence to the southeasternmost extremity of Point Manby.
( c ) A line drawn from the northernmost extremity of Point Riou to the easternmost extremity of Icy Cape.
October 16, 2015

Mr. Michael Hunley

521 Mulberry

Wyandotte, MI 48192

Dear Mr. Hunley :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request , posted to the public docket on July 24, 2015, and filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3154 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to su pport your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2831425-JAN-201112:01 PM
98-2066.

#### State v. Saylor.

Butler App. No. CA98-03-053. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-2730, *State v. Smith,*Butler App. No. CA97-01-011; briefing schedule stayed and cause consolidated with 98-2067, *supra.*

*1450Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would allow all propositions of law.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, June 16, 1995 (81), Para 81.15 Subpoena]
[Page 1012]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.81.15  subpoena

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, laid before the House a 
communication, which was read as follows:

                                            Committee on Standards

                                          of Official Conduct,

                                    Washington, DC, June 15, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: This is to formally notify you pursuant 
     to Rule L (50) of the Rules of the House that my Committee 
     has been served with a subpoena issued by the United States 
     District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
       After consultation with the General Counsel, I will make 
     the determinations required by the Rule.
           Sincerely,
                                                 Nancy L. Johnson,
                                                        Chairman.
```
Presidential Documents

36337 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 127 

Tuesday, July 3, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13436 of June 28, 2007 

Further Amending Executive Order 13381, as Amended, To 

Extend Its Duration by One Year 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, and in order to extend by 1 year 

the duration of Executive Order 13381 of June 27, 2005 (Strengthening 

Processes Relating to Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified National 

Security Information), as amended, it is hereby ordered that: 

Section 1. Section 6(a) of Executive Order 13381, as amended, is further 

amended by striking ‘‘April 1, 2007’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April 

1, 2008’’. 

Sec. 2. Section 6(b) of Executive Order 13381, as amended, is further amended 

by striking ‘‘July 1, 2007’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘July 1, 2008’’. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

June 28, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–3258 

Filed 7–2–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### § 81.77 Admissions as to facts and documents.

Not later than 15 days prior to the scheduled date of the hearing except for good cause shown, or prior to such earlier date as the presiding officer may order, any party may serve upon an opposing party a written request for the admission of the genuineness and authenticity of any relevant documents described in and exhibited with the request, or for the admission of the truth of any relevant matters of fact stated in the request. Each of the matters of which an admission is requested shall be deemed admitted, unless within a period designated in the request (not less than 10 days after service thereof, or within such further time as the presiding officer or the reviewing authority if no presiding officer has yet been designated may allow upon motion and notice) the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the requesting party a sworn statement either denying specifically the matters of which an admission is requested or setting forth in detail the reasons why he cannot truthfully either admit or deny such matters. Copies of requests for admission and answers thereto shall be served on all parties. Any admission made by a party to such request is only for the purposes of the pending proceeding, or any proceeding or action instituted for the enforcement of any order entered therein, and shall not constitute and admission by him for any other purpose or be used against him in any other proceeding or action.
Re: Docket No FAA-2011-0982 

Tomasz Rakowski

ANE-141, Engine Certification Branch 141 

t

o

:

WINKLER, Lutz 10/26/2011 09:55 AM

Dear Lutz,

Thank you for your comments. We may regard the borescope inspection as a way to determine the right 

configuration of the packing in the AD final rule, if we accrue enough technical information to support it.

Please, consider placing your comment into docket FAA-2011-0982.

At the moment the AMOC cannot be requested, as the AD is just a proposed rule (NPRM) and still a 

subject to changes.

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety.

Sincerely,

Tomasz M. Rakowski

Engine Certification Office

GE Large Engine CMT

T (781) 238-7735

F (781) 238-7199

E tomasz.rakowski@faa.gov

Click this link to send feedback

"WINKLER, Lutz" > Dear Tomasz, > 10/26/2011 05:52:53 AM

From: "WINKLER, Lutz" <lutz.winkler@mtu.de>

To: Tomasz Rakowski/ANE/FAA@FAA

Date: 10/26/2011 05:52 AM

Subject: Docket No FAA-2011-0982

Dear Tomasz,

we received the AD Notice of Proposed Rulemaking from Oct. 18.

Concerning alternate means of compliance MTU provides the following 

alternate procedure to identify suspect seals in assembled Engine conditions:

It's easy:

Just remove the blank from the fan strut hole 'E' .
Using a standard BSI equipment a trained inspector can visually inspect and identify 

the size of the gasket hole and therefore determine if the right configuration was installed.

That procedure can be done within one hour and prevents unnessary removals of the Core Engine from

the Fan Module. 

MTU ask to take this in consideration for an AMOC.

Thanks and regards, Lutz

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards

Lutz Winkler

MTU Maintenance Hannover GmbH

Senior Manager CF6/CFM56 Engineering (SPCG)

Muenchner Strasse 31

30855 Langenhagen

Germany

Tel +49 (0)511 7806 - 4643

Fax +49 (0)511 7806 - 4717

mailto:Lutz.Winkler@mtu.de

http://www.mtu.de

--

MTU Maintenance Hannover GmbH

Geschaeftsfuehrer/Chief Executive Officer: Dr. Martin Funk

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Stefan Weingartner

Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Langenhagen

Handelsregister/Commercial Register: Hannover HRB 9638

Diese E-Mail sowie ihre Anhänge enthalten MTU-eigene vertrauliche oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen.

Wenn Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger sind, informieren Sie bitte den Absender und löschen Sie diese

E-Mail sowie die Anhänge. Das unbefugte Speichern, Kopieren oder Weiterleiten ist nicht gestattet.

This e-mail and any attached documents are proprietary to MTU, confidential or protected by law.

If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

Any unauthorised storing, copying or distribution is prohibited.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, May 12, 1995 (65), Para 65.5 Clean Water Amendments]
[Page 695]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.65.5  clean water amendments

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LONGLEY, pursuant to House Resolution 140 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 961) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
  Mr. McINNIS, Chairman, assumed the chair; and after some time spent 
therein,
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending July 26, 2008

|Filer                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|---------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|SCOTT COUNTY STATE BANK, THE | * Branch       | The Scott County State Bank, Scottsburg, Indiana, to establish a branch facility to be located at 307 West Main Street, Austin, Indiana. | Newspaper:08/04/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                   | 08/04/2008    
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE OF EAT AT JOE'S LTD. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED  STATEMENTS
OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   284
<PP&E>                                             946
<DEPRECIATION>                                      12
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2315
<SALES>                                             85
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    85
<CGS>                                               57
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       57
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                    358
<SECURITIES>                                              771
<RECEIVABLES>                                             134
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             1,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        2,469
<PP&E>                                                  1,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                            547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          4,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     875
<BONDS>                                                   965
<COMMON>                                                   58
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            4,666
<SALES>                                                 7,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        9,544
<CGS>                                                   6,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           9,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           390
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       390
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .07
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 18, 2010

|Filer                                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|WARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P. | CIC           | Warburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P., New York, NY, to acquire up to 19.7% of National Penn Bancshares, Inc, Boyertown, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/08/2010
|Newspaper:                            | Not available
|Federal Register:                     | 12/08/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.215 Application. ( a ) With the exception of requirements preempted under 49 U.S.C. 5125(c), a State or political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe may apply to the Chief Counsel for a waiver of preemption with respect to any requirement that the State or political subdivision thereof or Indian tribe acknowledges to be preempted under the Federal hazardous materials transportation law, or that has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be so preempted. The Chief Counsel may waive preemption with respect to such requirement upon a determination that such requirement— ( 1 ) Affords an equal or greater level of protection to the public than is afforded by the requirements of the Federal hazardous material transportation law or the regulations issued thereunder, and
( 2 ) Does not unreasonably burden commerce.
( b ) Each application filed under this section for a waiver of preemption determination must: ( 1 ) Be submitted to the Chief Counsel: ( i ) By mail addressed to the Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, PHC-1, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001;
( ii ) By facsimile to 202-366-7041; or
( iii ) Electronically to the Chief Counsel at *phmsachiefcounsel@dot.gov .*
( 2 ) Set forth the text of the State or political subdivision requirement for which the determination is being sought;
( 3 ) Include a copy of any court order and any ruling issued under § 107.209 having a bearing on the application;
( 4 ) Contain an express acknowledgment by the applicant that the State, political subdivision, or Indian tribe requirement is preempted under Federal hazardous materials transportation law, unless it has been so determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or in a determination issued under § 107.209;
( 5 ) Specify each requirement of the Federal hazardous materials transportation law that preempts the State, political subdivision, or Indian tribe requirement;
( 6 ) State why the applicant believes the State, political subdivision or Indian tribe requirements affords an equal or greater level of protection to the public than is afforded by the requirements of the Federal hazardous material transportation law or the regulations issued thereunder;
( 7 ) State why the applicant believes the State, political subdivision or Indian tribe requirement does not unreasonably burden commerce; and
( 8 ) Specify what steps the State, political subdivision or Indian tribe is taking to administer and enforce effectively its inconsistent requirement.
[Amdt. 107-3, 41 FR 38171, Sept. 9, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 107-22, 55 FR 39978, Oct. 1, 1990; Amdt. 107-24, 56 FR 8621, 8623, Feb. 28, 1991; 56 FR 15510, Apr. 17, 1991; Amdt. 107-23, 56 FR 66156, Dec. 20, 1991; Amdt. 107-25, 57 FR 20428, May 13, 1992; Amdt. 107-32, 59 FR 49131, Sept. 26, 1994; Amdt. 107-38, 61 FR 21099, May 9, 1996; 68 FR 52847, Sept. 8, 2003; 71 FR 30068, May 25, 2006; 72 FR 55683, Oct. 1, 2007]