alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1352
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               39
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1352
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    40
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    61
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (21)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
#### August Siegrist, *Respondent, v.*Edward W. Everson, Appellant, *Impleaded, etc*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ■ Opinion by

Hardin, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending March 5, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|TRIUMPH BANK      | * 18C* Branch  | Triumph Bank, Memphis, Tennessee, to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the Arlington Community Bank, Arlington, Tennessee branch office of The Farmers Bank of Lynchburg, Lynchburg, Tennessee, and to retain the acquired facility as a branch office. | Newspaper:04/06/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/06/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard F. Latour, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MicroFinancial Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       /s/ RICHARD F. LATOUR Richard F. Latour
§ 535.305 Equipment interchange agreements—exemption. ( a ) An equipment interchange agreement is an agreement between two or more ocean common carriers for: ( 1 ) The exchange of empty containers, chassis, empty LASH/SEABEE barges, and related equipment; and
( 2 ) The transportation of the equipment as required, payment therefor, management of the logistics of transferring, handling and positioning equipment, its use by the receiving carrier, its repair and maintenance, damages thereto, and liability incidental to the interchange of equipment.
( b ) An equipment interchange agreement is exempt from the filing requirements of the Act and of this part.
( c ) The filing fee for optional filing of equipment interchange agreements is provided in § 535.401(g).
§ 32.56-30 Category A machinery spaces: Bulkheads and decks—T/ALL. ( a ) Bulkheads and decks that separate category A machinery spaces from cargo pumprooms must be “A” Class construction.
( b ) Bulkheads and decks that separate category A machinery spaces or cargo pumprooms, including the pumproom entrance, from accommodation, service, or control spaces must be “A-60” Class construction.
Editorial Note on Part 105
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 105 appear at 70 FR 56087, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 105.45 Issuing a subpoena. ( a ) *Subpoenas explained.* A subpoena is a document that may require you to attend a proceeding, produce documents or other physical evidence in your possession or control, or both. PHMSA may issue a subpoena either on its initiative or at the request of someone participating in a proceeding. Anyone who requests that PHMSA issue a subpoena must show that the subpoena seeks information that will materially advance the proceeding.
( b ) *Attendance and mileage expenses.* ( 1 ) If you receive a subpoena to attend a proceeding under this part, you may receive money to cover attendance and mileage expenses. The attendance and mileage fees will be the same as those paid to a witness in a proceeding in the district courts of the United States.
( 2 ) If PHMSA issues a subpoena to you based upon a request, the requester must serve a copy of the original subpoena on you, as required in § 105.50. The requester must also include attendance and mileage fees with the subpoena unless the requester asks PHMSA to pay the attendance and mileage fees because of demonstrated financial hardship and PHMSA agrees to do so.
( 3 ) If PHMSA issues a subpoena at the request of an officer or agency of the Federal government, the officer or agency is not required to include attendance and mileage fees when serving the subpoena. The officer or agency must pay the fees before you leave the hearing at which you testify.
§ 535.803 Ocean freight forwarder compensation. No conference or group of two or more ocean common carriers may: ( a ) Deny to any member of such conference or group the right, upon notice of not more than 5 calendar days, to take independent action on any level of compensation paid to an ocean freight forwarder; or
( b ) Agree to limit the payment of compensation to an ocean freight forwarder to less than 1.25 percent of the aggregate of all rates and charges applicable under the tariff assessed against the cargo on which the forwarding services are provided.
#### John M. French, Jr., *Appellant, v.*Daniel W. Powers, *Respon*dent.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide' event. Opinions by

Smith, P. J., and Hardin, J.;

Barker, J., dissenting.
§ 78.45-1 When required. ( a ) Vessels of 1,000 gross tons and over, and vessels of any tonnage on an international voyage shall have permanently exhibited for the guidance of the officer in charge of the vessel the following plans: ( 1 ) General arrangement plans showing for each deck the fire control stations, the various sections enclosed by fire-resisting bulkheads, together with particulars of the fire alarms, detecting systems, the sprinkler installation (if any), the fire extinguishing appliances, means of access to different compartments, decks, etc., and the ventilating systems including particulars of the master fan controls, the positions of dampers, the location of the remote means of stopping fans, and identification numbers of the ventilating fans serving each section. If cargo compartments are “specially suitable for vehicles,” they shall be so indicated on the plan. Alternatively, at the discretion of the Commandant, the listed details may be set out in a different medium, such as a booklet or on computer software, provided that the details are available to each officer and a written copy is retained on board at all times and is accessible during emergencies.
( 2 ) For vessels constructed on or after September 30, 1997, and for existing vessels which have their plans redrawn, the symbols used to identify the aforementioned details shall be in accordance with IMO Assembly resolution A.654(16). The identical symbols can be found in ASTM Adjunct F 1626.
( 3 ) Plans showing clearly for each deck and hold the boundaries of the watertight compartments, the openings therein with the means of closure and position of any controls thereof, and the arrangements for the correction of any list due to flooding.
( 4 ) The aforementioned information required for this section shall be kept up-to-date, any alteration being recorded in the applicable medium as soon as practicable.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51205, Sept. 30, 1997]
Release dates |     Full version (26 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending September 25, 2010

----

Testimony and Statements            Incentive Compensation -- statement by Scott G. Alvarez, general counsel, before the House Committee on Financial Services regarding incentive compensation in banking and financial services.            -Published, September 24, 2010            Forms            Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the Recordkeeping and Disclosure Requirements Associated with Securities Transactions Pursuant to Regulation H (Reg H-3).            -Approved, September 20, 2010                        Forms -- final Board review to implement the Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Limitations on Interbank Liabilities of Regulation F.            -Approved, September 23, 2010            Enforcement            First State Bank of Warner, Warner, South Dakota -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and the State of South Dakota, Department of Revenue and Regulation, Division of Banking.            -Announced, September 22, 2010                        LandMark Bank of Florida, Sarasota, Florida -- issuance of a prompt corrective action directive with the consent of the bank.            -Announced, September 23, 2010                        Miners and Merchants Bancorp, Inc., Grundy, Virginia, and TruPoint Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.            -Announced, September 23, 2010                        TIB Financial Corporation, Naples, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, September 22, 2010                        Trans Pacific Bancorp, San Francisco, California -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.            -Announced, September 20, 2010            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
In the Senate of the United States,

July 25, 1996.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1642) entitled ‘‘An Act to extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the

products of Cambodia, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with

the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

2 The Congress finds that—

3 (1) despite recent increases in acts of repression

4 by the Cambodian Government and growing govern5 ment corruption that has contributed to substantial

6 environmental degradation, Cambodia has made some

7 progress towards democratic rule after 20 years of un8 democratic regimes and civil war, and is striving to

9 rebuild its market economy;
2

HR 1642 EAS

1 (2) extension of unconditional most-favored-na2 tion treatment would assist Cambodia in developing

3 its economy based on free market principles and be4 coming competitive in the global marketplace;

5 (3) establishing normal commercial relations on

6 a reciprocal basis with Cambodia will promote

7 United States exports to the rapidly growing South8 east Asian region and expand opportunities for

9 United States business and investment in the Cam10 bodian economy; and

11 (4) expanding bilateral trade relations that in12 cludes a commercial agreement may promote further

13 progress by Cambodia on human rights and demo14 cratic rule and assist Cambodia in adopting regional

15 and world trading rules and principles.

16 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT

17 TO THE PRODUCTS OF CAMBODIA.

18 (a) HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE AMENDMENT.—

19 General note 3(b) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

20 United States is amended by striking ‘‘Kampuchea’’.

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by sub22 section (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or with23 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the ef24 fective date of a notice published in the Federal Register

25 by the United States Trade Representative that a trade
3

HR 1642 EAS

1 agreement obligating reciprocal most-favored-nation treat2 ment between Cambodia and the United States has entered

3 into force.

4 SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

5 The President shall submit to the Congress, not later

6 than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act,

7 a report on the trade relations between the United States

8 and Cambodia pursuant to the trade agreement described

9 in section 2(b).

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1642

AMENDMENT
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 1, 2008

|Filer               | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|S & T BANCORP, INC. | * 3A3       | S&T Bancorp, Inc., Indiana, PA to acquire up to 24.99% of the outstanding voting shares of Allegheny Valley Bancorp, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA. | Newspaper:11/24/2008Federal Register:11/28/2008
|Newspaper:          | 11/24/2008 
|Federal Register:   | 11/28/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*William Pelham, *Appellant, v.*James Jourdan, *Commissioner of Police and Excise, Respondent*.

Order removing ■ relator reversed. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Devina Olsen

Plaintiff,

v.

Asset Acceptance, LLC

Defendant.

Case No. 2:14-cv-14650-AC-EAS

Judge: 

Honorable Avern Cohn

Magistrate Judge: 

Honorable Elizabeth A. Stafford

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE

Now come the parties, through counsel, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby dismiss the present action with prejudice, each party to bear 

its own costs.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Hyslip & Taylor, LLC, LPA

By: /s/ David M. Menditto

David M. Menditto

1100 W. Cermak Rd., Suite B410

Chicago, IL 60608

Telephone: 312-380-6110

Fax: 312-361-2509

Email: davidm@fairdebt411.com

Illinois Bar No. 6216541

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: June 24, 2015

Dykema Gossett, PLLC

By: /s/ Aaron L. Vorce

Aaron L. Vorce

201 Townsend Street, Suite 900

Lansing, MI 48993

Telephone: 517-374-9150

Fax: 517-374-9191

Email: avorce@dykema.com

Michigan Bar No. P68797

Attorney for Defendant

Date: June 24, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-14650-AC-EAS ECF No. 12, PageID.36 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 24, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing 

Stipulation through the court’s CM/ECF system, which will perfect service upon 

the following:

Aaron L. Vorce

Dykema Gossett, PLLC

201 Townsend Street, Suite 900

Lansing, MI 48993

Counsel for:

Asset Acceptance, LLC

/s/ David M. Menditto

Case 2:14-cv-14650-AC-EAS ECF No. 12, PageID.37 Filed 06/24/15 Page 2 of 2
Argued and submitted June 28,

affirmed October 11, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PHILIP LEE KEPHART, *Appellant.*

(10-91-02674, 10-91-03155; CA A72778 (Control), A72779)

(Cases Consolidated)

904 P2d 176

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*278PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged in two indictments with 19 felonies that he committed against two dependent-child victims. Defendant was found guilty of all the crimes, although some were merged for the purpose of entering convictions. Defendant contests three of his sentences from CA A72778: the sentences for two counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, counts 7 and 8, and for one count of assault in the second degree, count 13. Defendant argues that those crimes were part of the same criminal episode as the crimes for which he was convicted in counts 1 and 2 in CA A72779, and that, because the court imposed consecutive sentences on his convictions, the court should have followed the sentencing procedure set out in OAR 253-12-020(2)(a) when imposing sentence on counts 7, 8 and 13.

We do not address defendant’s contention because he failed to present to the court below the arguments that he now makes, and the alleged error is not one that can be characterized as apparent on the face of the record. *See State v. Bucholz,*317 Or 309, 320-21, 855 P2d 1100 (1993).

Affirmed.