alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[111th Congress Public Law 224]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2385]]

Public Law 111-224
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  Making supplemental appropriations for the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for 
         other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 10, 2010 -  [H.R. 5874]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: United States Patent and 
Trademark Office Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010.>> assembled, 
That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2010, and for other purposes, namely:

                         DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

                United States Patent and Trademark Office

    For an additional amount for ``Salaries and Expenses'' of the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, $129,000,000, to remain available 
until expended: Provided, That the sum herein appropriated from the 
general fund shall be reduced as offsetting collections assessed and 
collected pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1113 and 35 U.S.C. 41 and 376 are 
received during fiscal year 2010, so as to result in a fiscal year 2010 
appropriation from the general fund estimated at $0: Provided further, 
That during fiscal year 2010, should the total amount of offsetting fee 
collections be less than $2,016,000,000, this amount shall be reduced 
accordingly.

                          Bureau of the Census

                     periodic censuses and programs

    Of funds <<NOTE: Recission.>> made available under this heading by 
Public Law 111-117, $129,000,000 are hereby rescinded.

[[Page 124 STAT. 2386]]

     This Act may be cited as the ``United States Patent and Trademark 
Office Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010''.

    Approved August 10, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5874:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            July 28, considered and passed House.
            July 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Aviall, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                    |  |                                                
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: July 28, 2004 |  | /s/ Paul E. Fulchino                           
|                    |  | Paul E. Fulchino                               
|                    |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Date: July 28, 2004 |  | /s/ Colin M. Cohen                             
|                    |  | Colin M. Cohen                                 
|                    |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 7, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

89–012 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–94

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA’S FY 2002 BUDGET REQUEST

ACT AND FY 2001 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET REQUEST

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FISCAL YEAR 2002 BUDGET REQUEST ACT AND FISCAL YEAR 2001 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET

REQUEST, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105–33 SEC. 11701(a)(1) (111

STAT. 780)

JULY 10, 2001.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered

to be printed

(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, July 2, 2001.

HON. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Pursuant to my constitutional authority and

consistent with sections 202 (c) and (e) of The District of Columbia

Financial Management and Responsibility Assistance Act of 1995

and section 446 of The District of Columbia Self-Governmental Reorganization Act as amended in 1989, I am transmitting the District of Columbia’s Fiscal Year 2002 Budget Request Act and Fiscal

Year 2001 Supplemental Budget Request.

The proposed FY 2002 Budget Request Act reflects the major

programmatic objectives of the Mayor and the Council of the District of Columbia. For FY 2002, the District estimates total revenues and expenditures of $5.3 billion, resulting in an adjusted surplus of $85.8 million.

The FY 2001 Supplemental Budget Request seeks approval for

the District to use $92.5 million in surplus local revenues to address FY 2001 budget pressures, and approval for the Water and

Sewer Authority (an enterprise fund) to spend $2.2 million of its

own revenue.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50671

Summary Calendar

 

GERALD T. ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VICTOR RAUL RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-637

- - - - - - - - - -

October 30, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald T. Armstrong (#1045673), a state prisoner, has

applied for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) authorizing an

appeal from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus. COA is DENIED as UNNECESSARY. See Green v. Johnson, 116

F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Armstrong contends that retroactive application of Texas’s

mandatory supervision statute, see Tex. Code Crim. Pro. art.
No. 96-50671

-2-

42.18 (West Supp. 1997), violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. 

Armstrong contends that he was improperly forced to accept

special release conditions such as sex-offender treatment and

supervision fees and that he had been repeatedly incarcerated

because he had breached those conditions. Armstrong argues that

he initially asserted his claim in a civil rights action and

would not have recast it as a habeas claim if he had not been

ordered to do so by the district court. Armstrong also contends

that retroactive application of a Texas Department of Criminal

Justice (“TDCJ”) policy prohibiting restoration of good-time

credits also violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing this claim as successive under Rule 9(b) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases. See Duff-Smith v. Collins, 995

F.2d 545, 546 (5th Cir. 1993). Relief may not be had on the

restoration-of-good-time-credits issue. See Hallmark v. Johnson,

118 F.3d 1073, 1079-80 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court’s

judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 5, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 54.10-5 Maximum allowable working pressure (reproduces UG-98). ( a ) The maximum allowable working pressure for a vessel is the maximum pressure permissible at the top of the vessel in its normal operating position at the designated coincident temperature specified for that pressure. It is the least of the values found for maximum allowable working pressure for any of the essential parts of the vessel by the principles given in paragraph (b) of this section and adjusted for any difference in static head that may exist between the part considered and the top of the vessel. (See appendix 3 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1.))
( b ) The maximum allowable working pressure for a vessel part is the maximum internal or external pressure, including the static head hereon, as determined by the rules and formulas in Section VIII of the ASME BPVC, together with the effect of any combination of loadings listed in UG-22 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (see § 54.01-30) that are likely to occur, or the designated coincident operating temperature, excluding any metal thickness specified as corrosion allowance. (See UG-25 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC.)
( c ) Maximum allowable working pressure may be determined for more than one designated operating temperature, using for each temperature the applicable allowable stress value.
Note 1 to § 54.10-5 :
Table 1 to § 54.10-5 gives the interrelation among the various pressure levels pertinent to this part of the regulations. It includes reference to Section VIII of the ASME BPVC for definitions and explanations.
[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65167, Oct. 31, 2008]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending October 9, 2010

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|AGRICULTURAL BANK OF CHINA, THE | FBSEA          | Agricultural Bank of China Limited, Beijing, China to upgrade its New York representative office to a branch office pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K.�                                                              | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable 
|Newspaper:                      | Not available 
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable
|CITIBANK, N.A.                  | Investment     | Citibank, N.A., Las Vegas, Nevada, and Citibank Overseas Investment Corporation, New Castle, Delaware, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K, to make an additional investment in Citicorp Finanziaria S.p.A., Milan, Italy. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|AMBOY BK, OLD BRIDGE, NEW JERSEY | 9807   | 01/26/2009 | 09/23/2010     | NI        | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANAGEMENT L.T.D.'S FINANCITAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           383,593
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 383,593
<CASH>                                          72,198
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             278,996
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          22,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,534,877
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                331,094
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             74,965
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           70,976
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                121,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,952
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           365
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,534,877
<PREMIUMS>                                      35,007
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             16,256
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,172)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  59,990
<BENEFITS>                                      18,680
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     16,385
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            40,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### § 78.10-1 Persons excluded.

Masters and pilots shall exclude from the pilothouse and navigation bridge while underway, all persons not connected with the navigation of the vessel. However, licensed officers of vessels, persons regularly engaged in training, regulating, evaluating or learning the profession of pilot, officials of the United States Coast Guard, United States Navy, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, National Ocean Service, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Maritime Administration, and National Transportation Safety Board may be allowed in the pilothouse or upon the navigation bridge upon the responsibility of the master or pilot.

[CGD 91-023, 59 FR 16779, Apr. 8, 1994, as amended by USCG-2001-10224, 66 FR 48620, Sept. 21, 2001; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58282, Sept. 29, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

# Place:

Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 “L” Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

# Status:

Part of the meeting will be open to the public and part of the meeting will be closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

*Open Session:*

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and 

2. Obligation of Funds for the EEOC National Contact Center.

*Closed Session:*

Agency Adjudication and Determination on Federal Agency Discrimination Complaint Appeals.

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, a part of the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

Dated: July 5, 2007.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 07-3348 Filed 7-5-07; 2:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-M