alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 69.59 Enclosed spaces.

*Enclosed space* means a space which is bounded by the vessel's hull, by fixed or portable partitions or bulkheads, or by decks or coverings other than permanent or movable awnings. No break in a deck, nor any opening in the vessel's hull, in a deck or in a covering of a space, or in the partitions or bulkheads of a space, nor the absence of a partition or bulkhead precludes the space from being included in the enclosed space. Portable enclosed spaces, regardless of method of attachment to the vessel, are treated as enclosed spaces as defined in this paragraph.

[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18721, Mar. 31, 2016]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ARLENE PREUDHOMME,

Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS and GARTH BAILEY,

Appellees.

No. 4D15-3640

[June 15, 2016]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael L. Gates, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE 14-004538 (12).

Arlene Preudhomme, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

Joseph S. Geller of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee, Christopher Matthews.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting the motion to quash service of process.

A plaintiff seeking to “invoke the court’s jurisdiction bears the burden 

of proving proper service,” which requires a showing that the return of 

service is “facially valid or regular on its face.” Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 

3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015). “If the return is regular on its face, then the 

service of process is presumed to be valid and the party challenging service 

has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing 

evidence.” Id. (quoting Re–Emp’t Servs., Ltd. v. Nat’l Loan Acquisitions Co., 

969 So. 2d 467, 471 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)); see also Bank of Am., N.A. v. 

Bornstein, 39 So. 3d 500, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Thus,

a defendant cannot impeach a summons by simply denying 

service, but must present “clear and convincing evidence” to 

corroborate his denial of service. Slomowitz v. Walker, 429 So.

2d 797, 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Clear and convincing 

evidence requires that the witnesses to a fact be credible; the 

facts testified to must be distinctly remembered; the details 
- 2 -

must be narrated exactly and in order; the testimony must be 

clear, direct and weighty; and the witnesses must be lacking 

in confusion as to the facts in issue. 

Lazo v. Bill Swad Leasing Co., 548 So. 2d 1194, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); 

see also Bornstein, 39 So. 3d at 503 (stating “clear and convincing 

evidence” standard for overcoming presumption of valid service).

Here, appellant met her initial burden of establishing the validity of 

service, as the return of service was regular on its face. The burden thus 

shifted to appellee to demonstrate that the place of service was not his 

usual place of abode. Appellee presented no documentation or live 

testimony at the hearing on the motion to quash, only his affidavit, which 

fell short of the “clear and convincing evidence” standard. See Johnson v. 

Christiana Tr., 166 So. 3d 940, 943-44 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Reversed and remanded.

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (i) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-100635) pertaining to the PsychiatricSolutions, Inc. 1997 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Key Personnel ofPsychiatric Solutions, Inc.;  (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-94983) pertaining to the 1997 EquityIncentive Plan of PMR Corporation;  (iii) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-38419) pertaining to the 1997 EquityIncentive Plan, 1995 Warrant Grant and the 1996 Stock Option Grants of PMR Corporation;  (iv) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-118529) pertaining to the Amended andRestated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan and the Amended and RestatedOutside Directors’ Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan;  (v) Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-139013) of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.;  (vi) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-128047) pertaining to the Amended andRestated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan; and  (vii) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-136339) pertaining to the Amended andRestated Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan;of ourreports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofPsychiatric Solutions, Inc., Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPFebruary 26, 2007
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 28, 1995 (51), Para 51.24 Providing for a Closed Conference--H.R. 889]
[Page 509]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.51.24  providing for a closed conference--h.r. 889

  Mr. LIVINGSTON moved, pursuant to clause 6(a) of rule XXVIII, that the 
conference committee meetings between the House and the Senate on the 
bill (H.R. 889) making emergency supplemental appropriations and 
rescissions to preserve and enhance the military readiness of the 
Department of Defense for the fiscal readiness of the Department of 
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other 
purposes; be closed to the public at such times as classified national 
security information is under consideration; Provided, however, that any 
sitting Member of Congress shall have a right to attend any closed or 
open meeting.
  The question being put,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. EWING, announced that a roll call was 
required under clause 6(a), rule XXVIII, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

403

affirmative

Nays

14
```
§ 1017.2 Definitions. For the purposes of these regulations, the following definitions will apply: ( a ) *Agency.* An executive agency as defined at 5 U.S.C. 105, including the U.S. Postal Service; the U.S. Postal Rate Board; a military department as defined at 5 U.S.C. 102; an agency or court in the Judicial Branch; an agency of the Legislative Branch, including the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives; and other independent establishments that are entities of the Federal Government.
( b ) *Creditor agency.* The agency to which the debt is owed.
( c ) *Debt.* An amount of money or property which has been determined by an appropriate agency official to be owed to the United States from any person.
( d ) *Disposable pay.* The amount that remains from an employee's Federal pay after required deductions for social security; Federal, State, or local income taxes; health insurance premiums; retirement contributions; life insurance premiums; Federal employment taxes; and any other deductions that are required to be withheld by law.
( e ) *FCCS.* The Federal Claims Collection Standards jointly published by the Justice Department and the General Accounting Office at 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.*
( f ) *Hearing official.* The official responsible for conducting a hearing which is properly and timely requested by the debtor. An Administrative Law Judge shall be responsible for conducting the hearing and the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall determine which judicial official will be assigned the hearing.
( g ) *Paying agency.* The agency that employs the individual who owes the debt and authorizes the payment of his/her current pay.
( h ) *Administrative offset.* The withholding of monies payable by the United States to or held by the United States on behalf of an employee to satisfy a debt owed the United States by that employee.
( i ) *Waiver.* A cancellation, forgiveness, or non-recovery of a debt allegedly owed by an employee or former employee to the agency as permitted or required by law.
§ 96.30-90 Vessels contracted for before November 23, 1992. Vessels contracted for before November 23, 1992, must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Each vessels must satisfy §§ 96.30-5 through 96.30-15 concerning the number of items and method of stowage of equipment.
( b ) Items of equipment previously approved, but not meeting the applicable specifications set forth in § 96.30-5, may continue in service as long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection; but each item in an installation or a replacement must meet all applicable specifications.
( c ) After November 23, 1994, each respirator must either satisfy § 96.30-5(a) or be a self-contained compressed-air breathing apparatus previously approved by MSHA and NIOSH under part 160, subpart 160.011, of this chapter.
§ 183.115 Applicability to existing vessels. ( a ) Except as otherwise required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, an existing vessel must comply with the regulations on electrical installations, equipment, and material that were applicable to the vessel on March 10, 1996, or, as an alternative, the vessel may comply with the regulations in this part.
( b ) An existing vessel must comply with the requirements of §§ 183.420 and 183.430.
( c ) New installations of electrical equipment and material, and the repair or replacement of wire and cable, on an existing vessel, which are completed to the satisfaction of the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) on or after March 11, 1996, must comply with this part. Replacement of existing equipment, not including wire or cable, installed on the vessel prior to March 11, 1996 need not comply with the regulations in this part.
§ 61.20-18 Examination requirements. ( a ) Each tailshaft must be drawn and visually inspected at each examination.
( b ) On tailshafts with a taper, keyway, (if fitted) and propeller designed in accordance with American Bureau of Shipping standards to reduce stress concentrations, the forward 1 ⁄ 3 of the shaft's taper section must be nondestructively tested in addition to a visual inspection of the entire shaft.
( c ) On tailshafts with a propeller fitted to the shaft by means of a coupling flange, the flange, the fillet at the propeller end, and each coupling bolt must be nondestructively tested in addition to a visual inspection of the entire shaft.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39652, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended by CGD 84-024, 53 FR 32231, Aug. 24, 1988]
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

USGS Online Publications Directory

```
NameLast modifiedSizeParent Directory                                    -   
of2010-1136_table1.csv         28-Sep-2010 16:51  1.8K  
of2010-1136_table1.ods         28-Sep-2010 23:09   18K  
of2010-1136_table1.txt         28-Sep-2010 16:51  1.8K  
of2010-1136_table1.xls         28-Sep-2010 16:51   22K  
of2010-1136_table1.xlsx        28-Sep-2010 16:50   51K  
of2010-1136_table2.csv         28-Sep-2010 16:52   20K  
of2010-1136_table2.ods         28-Sep-2010 23:10   42K  
of2010-1136_table2.txt         28-Sep-2010 16:52   20K  
of2010-1136_table2.xls         28-Sep-2010 16:52   93K  
of2010-1136_table2.xlsx        28-Sep-2010 16:50   91K  
of2010-1136_table3.csv         28-Sep-2010 16:53  140K  
of2010-1136_table3.ods         28-Sep-2010 23:12  159K  
of2010-1136_table3.txt         28-Sep-2010 16:53  140K  
of2010-1136_table3.xls         28-Sep-2010 16:53  410K  
of2010-1136_table3.xlsx        28-Sep-2010 16:50  243K
```

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey            URL: http://http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1136/tables/            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Tuesday, July 28 2009, 01:08:18 PM
<PAGE>   1
                         SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints BRADLEY C. ANDERSON as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Zila, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto,
and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting to such attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
that such attorney-in-fact and agent, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

     DATED:  October 29, 1999

                                             /s/ Joseph Hines
                                             --------------------------
                                             JOSEPH HINES

STATE OF ARIZONA    )
                    )
County of Maricopa  )

     On the 29th day of October, 1999, before me, the undersigned Notary
Public, personally appeared JOSEPH HINES, known to be the person whose name
is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the
same for the purposes therein contained.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

                                             /s/ Janice L. Backus
                                             --------------------------
                                             Notary Public


My commission expires:
[seal of Janice L. Backus]

                                       EXHIBIT
                                        24-A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

Doug Bilsky, Case No. 15-12151

Plaintiff, 

Judge Nancy G. Edmunds

-vsAbility Recovery Services,

Defendants. 

__________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been notified that the parties have reached a settlement 

of the case, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the docket be marked “Settled and 

Dismissed without Prejudice. Each party to bear own costs”. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any subsequent Dismissal filed setting

forth specific settlement terms and conditions shall supersede this Order. The Court 

retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order upon good cause shown that settlement has not 

been completed. All pending dates are hereby adjourned.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Nancy G. Edmunds

Nancy G. Edmunds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date: March 9, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-12151-NGE-APP ECF No. 19 filed 03/09/16 PageID.95 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending May 22, 2010

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST COLUMBIA BANCORP, INC. | CIC           | After-the-fact change in control notice filed by Stafford Lester Scaff, Jr., and Anne Csercsics Scaff, both of Lake City, Florida, to retain 19.94 percent of the outstanding shares of First Columbia Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp), and its subsidiary, Columbia Bank (Bank), both of Lake City, Florida; and to acquire up to 42 percent of the outstanding shares of Bancorp and Bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2010 (July 1, 2010 - September 30, 2010)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Interlink Global Corporation (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anastasios Kyriakides, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 15, 2008


                          By: Anastasios
                          Kyriakides
                          Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              32
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 13, 2008

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|182 BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A1       | 182 Bancshares, Inc., Mankato, Minnesota, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Bank 182, Mankato, Minnesota, a de novo bank. | Newspaper:12/22/2008Federal Register:12/18/2008
|Newspaper:           | 12/22/2008 
|Federal Register:    | 12/18/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.26 Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 700]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.26  public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. GEPHARDT (by request):
       H.R. 1635. A bill to combat domestic terrorism; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees 
     on Banking and Financial Services, and Commerce, for a period 
     to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
     for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
           By Mr. BLILEY (for himself, Mr. McIntosh, Mr. Condit, 
             and Mr. Stenholm):
       H.R. 1636. A bill to provide a more complete accounting of 
     national expenditures and the corresponding benefits of 
     Federal regulatory programs through issuance of an accounting 
     statement and associated report every 2 years, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Government Reform and 
     Oversight.
           By Mr. CRANE:
       H.R. 1637. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
     1986 to repeal the requirement that a taxpayer must receive a 
     ruling from the Secretary of the Treasury in order to 
     determine the deduction for contributions to a reserve for 
     nuclear decommissioning costs, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Ways and Means.
           By Mr. DORNAN:
       H.R. 1638. A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality 
     Act to provide that petitioners for immigration 
     classification on the basis of immediate relative status to a 
     citizen shall be required to pay only one fee when such 
     petitioners are filed at the same time; to the Committee on 
     the Judiciary.
           By Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts:
       H.R. 1639. A bill to amend the Ethics in Government Act of 
     1978 with respect to honoraria, and for other purposes; to 
     the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
     Committees on Government Reform and Oversight, House 
     Oversight, and National Security, for a period to be 
     subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
     consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
           By Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself and Mr. Riggs):
       H.R. 1640. A bill to provide a low-income school choice 
     demonstration program; to the Committee on Economic and 
     Educational Opportunities.
```