alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,885,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,127,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,035,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,393,131
<PP&E>                                     126,082,612
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,185,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             136,420,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,512,281
<BONDS>                                     21,650,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    43,378,440
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,504,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               136,420,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,466,048
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,979,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,235,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,611,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,479,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,479,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.191
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.190


</TABLE>
#### § 68.25 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains citizen ownership requirements and procedures to allow documentation of vessels which do not meet the requirements of part 67 of this chapter. The requirements are for the limited purposes of training for, implementing, and supporting oil spill cleanup operations.

[CGD 90-055, 57 FR 7642, Mar. 3, 1992. Redesignated by USCG-2005-20258, 71 FR 61418, Oct. 18, 2006]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending May 7, 2011

|Filer                               | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|HOMETOWN COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC         | Prior change in control notice filed by Ranjeet Singh Sidhu, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to acquire approximately 85.54 percent of the  outstanding shares of Hometown Community Bancshares, and its subsidiary, Hometown Community Bank, both of Braselton, Georgia. | Newspaper:05/28/2011Federal Register:05/23/2011
|Newspaper:                          | 05/28/2011 
|Federal Register:                   | 05/23/2011 
|SEQUATCHIE VALLEY BANCSHARES, INC.  | * 3A3       | Sequatchie Valley Bancshares, Inc., Dunlap, Tennessee to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding shares of The Citizens Bank of Spencer, Spencer, Tennessee.                                                                                                       | Newspaper:05/30/2011Federal Register:05/23/2011
|Newspaper:                          | 05/30/2011 
|Federal Register:                   | 05/23/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict—SEP.                    

*Date:*                         June 5, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency, 7400 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                              ( print page 26410)    

*Contact Person:*                         Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800,                         *bbuzas@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 30, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2293 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1799
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       30
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1829
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               60
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 2, 1995 (60), Para 60.15 Message from the President--Budget Impoundment]
[Page 625]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.60.15  message from the president--budget impoundment

  The SPEAKER tempore, Mr. COMBEST, laid before the House a message from 
the President, which was read as follows:
To the Congress of the United States:
  In accordance with the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974, I herewith report three rescission proposals, totaling 
$132.0 million.
  The proposed rescissions affect the Departments of Justice and 
Transportation, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
                                                   William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, May 2, 1995.
  By unanimous consent, the message, together with the accompanying 
papers, was referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered to 
be printed (H. Doc. 104-59).
```
#### BENJAMIN GREENBAUM, PROSECUTOR, v. ZENO HIGGINS AND PATRICK L. LYNCH AND THE PASSAIC DISTRICT COURT, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 18, 1929

Decided November 14, 1929.

*1013Before Justices Treychard, Lloyd and Case.

Eor the prosecutor, *Peter Cohn.*

Eor the respondents, *.Edward P. Merrey*and *Barton II. Walker.*

Per Curiam.

Greenbaum, the prosecutor of this writ, obtained a judgment in the Passaic District Court, in his suit against Zeno Higgins and Patrick L. Lynch, in the absence of the defendants.

Thereafter the judge of the District Court allowed the defendants a rule to show cause why such judgment should not be opened. After hearing, the judge opened the judgment.

The legal propriety of that order is now challenged.

We think it should not be disturbed.

It appears from an examination of the order and of the finding of facts made by the trial judge that the trial judge found from the evidence that when the case was originally put on the list for trial the plaintiff did not appear, and the case was marked “not moved;” that later the case was restored to the list at the request of the plaintiff and heard in the absence of the defendants and judgment entered for the plaintiff; that defendants were not notified of the day fixed for such trial as required by section 148 of the District Court act; that notice to Mr. Stalter was not notice to the defendants because his services in behalf of the defendants had been discontinued during the interval and that the attorney of the plaintiff had knowledge of such discontinuance at the time the case was fnoved for trial; that the defendants had a defense to such action on the merits of the case.

*1014The evidence taken at the hearing on the rule, and upon which the order was based, is not laid before ns in detail. In such situation we assume that the evidence justified the finding, and that being so we think the order was justified. But the plaintiff says the order opening the judgment was made more than thirty days after the judgment was entered, and he argues that under section 17 of the District Court act the-o'rder, made eighty-nine days after judgment, came too late. We think not. This order was not made under the statute, but under the inherent power of the court to vacate a judgment void for want of jurisdiction because the parties were-not legally in court. See 34 *C. J.*255, and *Lutler*v. *Neubauer,*100 *N. J. L.*17.

The order is affirmed, with costs.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 15, 2011

|Filer                             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS BANCORP OF HICKMAN, INC. | CIC         | Notice by the Coffey Family control group, Hickman, Kentucky, to retain control of Citizens Bancorp of Hickman, Inc., Hickman, Kentucky. The Coffey Family control group consists of Avery Coffey, Carla Coffey, Briley N. Coffey, James Coffey, Harold P. Coffey, Jr., Jill Coffey, Brooke Coffey, James Benjamin Coffey, Jentrie Coffey, Sue Werner, all of Hickman, Kentucky; and Patsy Campbell, Fulton, Kentucky. | Newspaper:02/02/2011Federal Register:02/01/2011
|Newspaper:                        | 02/02/2011 
|Federal Register:                 | 02/01/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|PROVIDENCE BK, COLUMBIA, MISSOURI | 704755 | 09/20/2010 | 12/31/2010     | O         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 91.01-10 Period of validity for a Certificate of Inspection. ( a ) Certificates of inspection will be issued for a period of 5 years. Application may be made by the master, owner, or agent for inspection and issuance of a new certificate of inspection at any time during the period of validity of the current certificate.
( b ) Certificates of inspection may be revoked or suspended by the Coast Guard where such process is authorized by law. This may occur if the vessel does not meet the requirements of law or regulations in this chapter or if there is a failure to maintain the safety requirements requisite to the issuance of a certificate of inspection.
( c ) The master or owner of a seagoing barge for which inspection and certification is required by 46 CFR 90.05-25(a), or the master or owner's agent, may apply for a certificate of inspection that is valid for a specific period less than 5 years, or for a specific voyage. The certificate will describe the conditions under which it is issued, and will be endorsed as applying to an unmanned seagoing barge. Paragraph (c) of this section applies if the seagoing barge- ( 1 ) Makes a voyage beyond the Boundary Line for the sole purpose of changing employment; or
( 2 ) Makes a voyage beyond the Boundary Line only infrequently and after doing so returns to its port of departure.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16974, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18901, Dec. 18, 1968; CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48051, Sept. 18, 1995; USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6501, Feb. 9, 2000; USCG-2011-0363, 78 FR 53328, Aug. 29, 2013]
Exhibit 15.1



|                                                                    |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|November 16, 2012 
The Board of Directors Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. |  | LOGO
|Unit 1201, 12/F Tower 1,
Lippo Centre 89 Queensway Hong
Kong        |  |     

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-76940 and 333-136653 on Form S-8 of our reports relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules in Schedule 1 of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
dated March 16, 2012, appearing in the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011.

/s/ Moore
Stephens

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong
#### William Brady v. The State.

*No. 189.*

*Decided June 7.*

Evidence — Extra-Judicial Confessions — Corpus Delicti.—Extrajudicial confessions alone, uncorroborated by other evidence as to the main fact, are inadequate to establish the corpus delicti of crime.

Appeal from the District Court of Edwards. Tried below before Hon.. C. C. Clamp, Special Judge.

The indictment in this case charged defendant with offering to bribe, one A. Y. D. Old, to procure the dismissal of a certain prosecution, by indictment, against one Dave Sweeten, charged with the theft of one head of cattle, and in which said case the said A. Y. D. Old had .been employed as private prosecutor to assist the district attorney. At the trial appellant was convicted, and his punishment assessed at two years, in the penitentiary.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

*Clark & Fullea', W. T. MerriwetJier,*and *I. N. Spann,*for appellant.

*R. L. Henry,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

SIMKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for offering to bribe A. Y. D. Old, an attorney at law (who was employed by some private parties to prosecute one Dave Sweeten for cattle theft), and sentenced to. two years in the penitentiary, from which he appeals.

*265We find it unnecessary to consider the interesting questions raised by appellant’s brief. Conceding that Old, who was an attorney employed by private prosecutors to assist the district attorney, could be the subject of bribery, still, as we regard the case made by the record before us, the sole incriminative evidence rests upon the confession of appellant. Outside of that confession, there is no evidence that Old was ever offered a bribe of any character by appellant, directly or indirectly. There is no evidence that Ira Wheat, the sheriff, agreed to offer Old anything, or that he ever spoke to Old in reference to the matter. His evidence was, that appellant offered him $150 to use his influence with Old to secure the dismissal of the case, but there is no evidence that he did so. If we turn to the confession itself, it clearly shows that appellant acted as agent for Wallace, who had started the prosecution, and now wished it dismissed. There is no proof of a corpus delicti in this case. It is declared to be a. proposition to which there is but little dissent, that extra-judicial confessions alone, uncorroborated by other evidence as to the main fact, are-inadequate to establish a corpus delicti. 1 Bish. Crim. Proc., sec. 1058. Old died before the trial, and there is no one who heard the offer, or knows that any offer was actually made, outside of the statement of appellant; and that confession shows that the offer was made in Wallace’s-name, and at the request of Wallace, who was originally interested in the prosecution by Old, but now desired the prosecutor to withdraw the-prosecution, because Sweeten had become his son-in-law pending said-prosecution.

For the want of evidence, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.