alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
98-913.

#### State v. Green.

Lucas C.P. No. 971450. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to unseal record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to unseal record be, and hereby is, granted.
#### Toledo Bar Association *v.*Vild.

[Cite as *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Vild*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 179.]

(No. 98-1234

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided December 9, 1998.)

*R. Jeffrey Bixler,*for relator.

*Jeffrey T. Vild, pro se.*

*180
      *Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 26, 2009

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BONIFAY HOLDING COMPANY, INC. | CIC           | Prior change in control notice filed by Kirk Doskocil to acquire 50.1 percent of the outstanding shares of Bonifay Holding Company, Inc., and its subsidiary, Bank of Bonifay, both of Bonifay, Florida. Total pro forma ownership will equal 50.1 percent. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/13/2010
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 01/13/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ALIANT BK, ALEXANDER CITY, ALABAMA    | 861434  | 08/17/2009 | 12/08/2009     | S         | Large Bank 
|IBERIABANK, LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA      | 808176  | 06/01/2009 | 12/07/2009     | S         | Large Bank 
|MARCO CMNTY BK, MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA | 3195653 | 07/13/2009 | 12/14/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 19, 2007

|Filer                  | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|NORTHUMBERLAND BANCORP | CIC         | J. Donald Steele, Jr., and Joanne K. Steele, Lewisburg, PA to purchase up to 35% of Northumberland Bancorp, PA. | Newspaper:05/24/2007Federal Register:05/21/2007
|Newspaper:             | 05/24/2007 
|Federal Register:      | 05/21/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 45.127 Position of structures, openings, and fittings. For the purposes of this part— ( a ) *Position 1* means in an exposed position on— ( 1 ) The freeboard deck or a raised quarter deck;
( 2 ) A superstructure deck or a trunk deck and forward of a point 1 ⁄ 4 *L* from the forward perpendicular; or
( 3 ) A trunk deck whose height is less than *H* s.
( b ) *Position 2* means— ( 1 ) On a superstructure deck aft of a point 1 ⁄ 4 *L* abaft the forward perpendicular; or
( 2 ) On a superstructure and trunk combination, that is *H* s or more n height, aft or a point 1 ⁄ 4 *L* abaft the forward perpendicular.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Nationalcompensation survey. State and local government. Paducah, KY-IL
2007,2008,2009,2010

 
SuDoc:[if !vml]>[endif]>L 2.121/57:P 13/ 
�Item Number: 0768-B-55 (online)
CGP system Number:000743706
#### Gitchell *v.*Andover.

Leave to file a claim against a town, under Gen. Laws, c. 75, s. 9, may be granted without a full trial of the merits of the claim, when the petitioner has suffered substantial damage, intends in good faith to try the question of his right to recover, introduces evidence tending to prove all material facts, and was unavoidably prevented from filing his claim within ten days; and justice manifestly requires he should have an opportunity to prosecute it.

Petition, under Gen. Laws, *e.*75, *s.*9. The petitioner alleged that he received the injury of which he complained, Nov. 17,1878; and, subject to the defendants’ exception, the court allowed the petition to be amended by striking out 17 and inserting 18.

*364Grould, for the plaintiff.

Shirley, for the defendants.

Stanley, J.

It was not the design of the statute to subject the parties to the expense of two trials. The plaintiff, while travelling on a highway in Andover, was seriously injured, and was unavoidably prevented from filing a claim for damages against the town within the time prescribed by the statute. He introduced evidence tending to prove all the facts essential to his right to recover, and he intends in good faith to prosecute his claim and bring it to a trial. The defendants offered evidence tending to disprove their liability, and contended'that leave should not be granted, unless it appeared, upon a full trial of the case, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. The court, finding that the plaintiff was unavoidably prevented from filing his claim as required by the statute, and that justice manifestly required that he should have an opportunity to prosecute it, properly granted his petition without a full trial of the merits of the case. It may appear that a claimant ought to have a trial without a full trial of the merits *(Holton*v. Olcott, 58 N. H. 598), and when it does, the petition should be granted. This proceeding is not unlike a petition for leave to appeal from a probate decree, or a petition for a new trial where justice has not been done and a further hearing would be equitable. In such cases, if it appear that important questions of fact or law are involved, which the petitioner intended and was reasonably entitled to litigate, and that he has been prevented through accident, mistake, or misfortune, and not from his own fault, the petition is granted. *N. E. Ins. Co.*v. *Lisbon Mfg.*Co., 22 N. H. 172; *N. & L. R. R.*v. Stimpson, 35 N. H. 286; *Matthews*v. Fogg, 35 N. H. 289. The question in all such cases is, What, in view of all the circumstances, does justice require? — and this is notto be determined upon any narrow or technical ground. The purpose of the statute was remedial. Its object was to prevent a failure of justice where the party seeking it is without fault.

The amendment was properly allowed. The petition is a proceeding in the course of justice. *Stebbins*v. *Ins. Co.,*59 N. H. 143.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Bingham and Allen, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending April 28, 2007

----

Testimony And StatementsIndustrial Loan Companies  -- statement by Vice Chairman Kohn before the House Committee on Financial Services.					-Published, April 25, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: May 3, 2007
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 28, 1995 (51), Para 51.12 Police and Firefighters Retirement Age]
[Page 507]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.51.12  police and firefighters retirement age

  Mr. FAWELL moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 849) to 
amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to reinstate an 
exemption for certain bona fide hiring and retirement plans applicable 
to State and local firefighters and law enforcement officers, and for 
other purposes.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. McINNIS, recognized Mr. FAWELL and Mr. 
MARTINEZ, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. McINNIS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
§ 58.16-35 Markings. ( a ) The outside of the cylinder enclosure housing liquefied petroleum gas cylinders, valves and regulators must be marked as follows: Liquefied Petroleum Gas Keep Open Fires Away.
( b ) A durable and permanently legible instruction sign covering safe operation and maintenance of the gas-consuming appliance shall be installed adjacent to the appliance.
( c ) “Operating Instructions” as listed in § 58.16-30 shall be framed under glass, or other equivalent, clear, transparent material, in plainly visible locations on the outside of the metal enclosure and near the most frequently used gas-consuming appliance, so they may be easily read.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 27, 2009

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|SONABANK               | * 18C* Branch  | Sonabank, McLean, Virginia, to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the Warrenton, Virginia, branch of Millennium Bank, N.A., Reston, Virginia. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | Not available 
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable
|VIRGINIA HERITAGE BANK | * Branch       | Virginia Heritage Bank, Fairfax, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 8245 Boone Boulevard, Vienna, Virginia.                                                | Newspaper:06/18/2009Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:             | 06/18/2009    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending August 8, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 69.69 Tonnage certificates. ( a ) On request of the vessel owner, the authorized measurement organization must issue an International Tonnage Certificate (1969) as evidence of the vessel's measurement under this subpart for a vessel that is 24 meters (79.0 feet) or more in registered length, will engage on a foreign voyage, and is not a vessel of war. The Certificate is delivered to the vessel owner or master and must be maintained on board the vessel when it is engaged on a foreign voyage. For a vessel for which a remeasurement under § 69.71 resulted in a net tonnage ITC decrease due to changes other than alterations or modifications to the vessel deemed by the Commandant to be of a major character, an International Tonnage Certificate (1969) reflecting the decreased net tonnage ITC will not be reissued until 12 months have elapsed from the date of measurement indicated on the current certificate.
( b ) If an International Tonnage Certificate (1969) is not issued for a vessel measured under this part, the measurement organization must issue a U.S. Tonnage Certificate as evidence of the vessel's measurement under this subpart, which must also indicate the vessel's measurement under any other subpart of this part. There is no requirement to maintain the U.S. Tonnage Certificate on board the vessel.
( c ) For a vessel that transfers flag to a foreign country that is party to the Convention, the International Tonnage Certificate (1969) remains valid for a period not to exceed 3 months after the flag transfer, or until an International Tonnage Certificate (1969) is issued under authority of the foreign country to replace it, whichever is earlier.
[USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18722, Mar. 31, 2016]
#### § 503.49 Payment of fees and charges.

The fees charged for special services may be paid through the mail by check, draft, or postal money order, payable to the Federal Maritime Commission, except for charges for transcripts of hearings. Transcripts of hearings, testimony and oral argument are furnished by a nongovernmental contractor, and may be purchased directly from the reporting firm.

[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, redesignated at 79 FR 24351, Apr. 30, 2014]
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 121 / Monday, June 25, 2007 / Presidential Documents 34977 

Memorandum of June 12, 2007 

Assignment of Certain Reporting Functions of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] Secretary of Defense[, and the] 

Director of National Intelligence 

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United 

States Code, I hereby assign to the Secretary of State the functions of the 

President under sections 1211(b), 1213(b), and 1226(c) of the John Warner 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109– 

364). 

In the performance of such functions, the Secretary of State should coordinate 

with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, 

and the heads of other departments and agencies, as appropriate. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 12, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–3139 

Filed 6–22–07; 9:57 am] 

Billing code 4710–10 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES4GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
         (As adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     For the Annual Report of Cole Computer Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certify that:

          (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
               the Report.

Dated: April 14, 2004

                                       /s/  John L. Ruth
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       /s/  Lyndel Lackey
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cole Computer Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

[This Section 906 certification accompanies the Report, but is not "filed" as
part of the Report.]
§ 71.25-1 Prerequisite of reissuance of certificate of inspection. ( a ) The annual inspection is a prerequisite of the reissuance of a certificate of inspection.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### Coe *& a. v.*Carter *& a.*

Chapter 41, Laws of 1875, is not applicable to an unincorporated place, which has organized and elected officers, and raised money by taxation for highways and other town purposes.

*484Bill in Equity. Facts agreed.

Wentworth’s Location was organized, under Gen. St., *c.*48, February 8,1876, by electing officers as required by that statute. On the second Tuesday of March, 1876, town officers were again chosen, and annually since. At the annual meeting in March, 1876, the Location voted to raise money to build a school-house, for the support of schools, and for highways, and at the annual meetings since money has been raised for similar purposes and for town charges, and the selectmen have taken inventories and assessed the taxes voted, which have been collected.

The state treasurer, under the provisions of *c.*41, Laws of 1875, has assessed a tax on the Location for 1876 and 1877, which he is proceeding to collect. The question is reserved, whether the assessment and collection of the taxes assessed by the officers of the Location exonerates it from the payment of the taxes assessed by the 'state treasurer.

*W S.*Seywood, for the plaintiffs.

*The Attorney-G-eneral,*for the defendants.

Stanley, J.

Wentworth’s Location was organized by electing officers, and it has raised money by taxation to be expended on highways and for other purposes. This renders the act of 1875 inapplicable to it, and it is therefore exonerated from the payment of the tax assessed under the provisions of that act. If it were otherwise, the Location would be subject to double taxation. It is not necessary to decide whether the act of 1875 is constitutional, for, whether it is or is not, it is not applicable to this Location.

*Case discharged.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.