alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 92.15-90 Vessels contracted for prior to November 19, 1952. ( a ) Existing arrangements previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standards as the original design provided that in no case will a greater departure from the standards of §§ 92.15-5 through 92.15-15 be permitted than presently exists.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Scott D. Kaplan, Chief
Executive Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31,
2009, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey) and The
Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.



Date:March 23, 2010/s/ Scott D. KaplanScott D. Kaplan Chief
Executive Officer Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### § 1113.14 Objections to rulings.

It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling is made or sought, make known to the officer on the record the action which he desires the officer to take or his objection to the action of the officer and his grounds for that objection. An objection not pressed in brief will be considered as waived. Where no brief is filed an objection will be considered as waived if not pressed in an appeal or reply to an appeal, if filed, or in a separate petition dealing only with that objection.
1

Daisy Wang

From: Lawrence, Deana (DEQ) [LawrenceD6@michigan.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 3:56 PM

To: Daisy Wang

Cc: Fongers, Dave (DEQ); Sweet, Debra (DEQ); Fitch, Hal (DEQ)

Subject: RE: Copyright data clarification for US EPA (MI DEQ)

Good Afternoon Daisy:

Please note the state of Michigan’s policies for webpages here: http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7‐135‐‐281460‐‐

,00.html.

So long as it is noted the information originated with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s Office of Oil,

Gas, and Minerals, and it is not being used with fraudulent intentions, we are more than willing to allow the use of the

information.

Thank You! 

Deana M. Lawrence

Executive Secretary & Notary Public 

SOM-DEQ-OOGM 

517-284-6823 

LawrenceD6@michigan.gov

From: Daisy Wang [mailto:Daisy.Wang@erg.com]  

Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 1:18 PM

To: Fongers, Dave (DEQ)

Subject: Copyright data clarification for US EPA (MI DEQ)

Hi Mr. Fongers,

My name is Daisy Wang and I work for Eastern Research Group, Inc., a contractor for the United States Environmental

Protection Agency. We are supporting EPA with a rule making that will cover the unconventional oil and gas extraction

industry (http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/oilandgas/unconv.cfm).  

As part of the rulemaking process, we downloaded data from MI DEQ’s website for analysis. EPA has determined that

they would like to make these analyses and the raw data available in the public record to support the rulemaking. We

noticed that the website has a blanket copyright claim, but it is unclear what is covered under this claim. Could you help

us to clarify if specific data files are copyrighted or not? If so, I can send you a list of the data files that are in question. If

not, could you please point us to the best person who can answer our question?

I recently left you a voicemail with this same information, but hopefully it will be easier to read in an e‐mail! Thank you

in advance for your help.

Sincerely,

Daisy Wang

Environmental Engineer

Eastern Research Group, Inc.

(848) 209‐9675

daisy.wang@erg.com
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7377** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. FLOYD RAYMOND LOOKER, a/k/a Ray , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg
. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:96

- cr - 00043

- FPS

- 1; 1:99

- cv 00181

- FPS )

Submitted : March 14, 2011 Decided: April 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Floyd Raymond Looker, Appellant Pro Se. David Earl Godwin, Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Floyd Raymond Looker, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his previously denied 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judg e issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- E l v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Looker has n ot made the requisite showing. A district court may only grant a post

- judgment motion to amend if the court has vacated the underl ying judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) or 60(b). Laber v. Harvey , 438 F.3d 404, 427

- 48 (4th Cir. 2006) (en banc) . Here, the district court did not3 vacate the underlying judgment, a judgment that this c ourt declined to overrule on appeal. Accord ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DIS MISSED
H. R. 1804

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 6th and

Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South

6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States Post

Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

Courthouse’’.Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Max Rosenn United Statesat 197 South Main Street in Wilkes-Barre,
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 197

South Main Street in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, as

the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1718 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 197 South

3 Main Street in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States

5 Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the court9 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref10 erence to the ‘‘Max Rosenn United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 18

(legislative day, December 15), 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 1018.63 Termination of collection action. Collection action shall be terminated: ( a ) Whenever it is determined that the claim is legally without merit; or
( b ) When it is determined that the evidence necessary to prove the claim cannot be produced, or necessary witnesses are unavailable, and efforts to induce voluntary payments have been unavailing.
§ 28.315 Fire pumps, fire mains, fire hydrants, and fire hoses. ( a ) Each vessel 36 feet (11.8 meters) or more in length must be equipped with a self-priming, power driven fire pump connected to a fixed piping system. ( 1 ) A fire pump on a vessel 79 feet (24 meters) or more in length must be capable of delivering water simultaneously from the two highest hydrants, or from both branches of the fitting if the highest hydrant has a siamese fitting, at a pitot tube pressure of at least 50 psi (0.345 Newtons per square millimeter) and a flow rate of at least 80 gpm (303 liters per minute).
( 2 ) Each vessel with a power driven fire pump must be equipped to permit energizing the fire main from the operating station and from the pump.
( b ) *Fire main, hydrants, hoses and nozzles.* ( 1 ) A vessel required to have a fixed fire main system must have a sufficient number of fire hydrants to reach any part of the vessel using a single length of fire hose.
( 2 ) A fire hose must be connected to each fire hydrant at all times the vessel is operating.
( 3 ) A fire hose on a vessel less than 79 feet (24 meters) in length must be at least 5 ⁄ 8 inch (16 millimeters) nominal diameter, be of good commercial grade and be fitted with a nozzle of corrosion resistant material capable of providing a solid stream and a spray pattern.
( 4 ) A fire hose on a vessel 79 feet (24 meters) or more in length must be lined commercial fire hose and be fitted with a nozzle made of corrosion resistant material capable of providing a solid stream and a spray pattern.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1804

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office-CourtParker Federal Building’’. Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. house located at South 6th and Rogers Avenue,
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1804

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith,

Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at

5 South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas,
2

•HR 1804 EH

1 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.

2 Parker Federal Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

6 States Post Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1

7 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.

8 Parker Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-752
In Re: RESTONEY ROBINSON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus, (CA-96-1017-6) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Restoney Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Restoney Robinson brought this mandamus petition complaining about the district court's handling of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action he brought concerning disciplinary action taken against him after he tested positive for marijuana use in a random prison drugtest. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief in that action, and on appeal, this court affirmed. See Robinson v. Atkins , No. 97-6773 (4th Cir. Sept. 17,1997) (unpublished). Apparently, in this mandamus petition, Robinson seeks to revisit the concerns he raised in the § 1983 action. Where there is another available remedy, mandamus relief is not available. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is not a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers of America , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Robinson could have raised these claims in an appeal from the § 1983 action. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 1035.2 Modification of front of uniform bill of lading.

Notwithstanding any other provision of § 1035.1(a), with respect to the information called for, the front portion only (appendix A to this part) of a bill of lading may deviate from the language prescribed in this part so long as the deviation conforms with approved national standards for the electronic data interchange or other commercial requirements for bill of lading information; *provided* that no such deviation in the language shall affect the obligations of any shipper to provide information absent the consent of such shipper nor shall such deviation be deemed to alter any rights or obligations conferred by statute or regulation on either carriers or shippers with respect to the preparation or issuance of bills of lading.
§ 95.16-45 Pre-discharge alarms and time delay devices. ( a ) Each system protecting a space with greater than 6,000 cubic feet gross volume or a space less than 6,000 cubic feet gross volume without a suitable horizontal escape route must have a pneumatic pre-discharge alarm and time delay. ( 1 ) The time delay period must: ( i ) Last at least 20 seconds;
( ii ) Be approved by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection during system installation; and
( iii ) Provide enough time for one person to walk from the farthest area of the protected space to the primary exit.
( 2 ) The time delay device must be pneumatically operated and have an accuracy of −0/+20 percent of the rated time delay period throughout the operating temperature range and range of delay settings.
( b ) The pre-discharge alarm must: ( 1 ) Sound for the duration of the time delay;
( 2 ) Be conspicuously and centrally located in the protected space and marked as required by 46 CFR 97.37-9;
( 3 ) Depend on the extinguishing agent, gas from a pilot cylinder, or a nitrogen cylinder specifically provided to power the alarm for its source of power; and
( 4 ) Be audible over running machinery.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending May 21, 2011

|Filer                              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST WESTERN BANK AND TRUST       | * 18C* Branch  | First Western Bank & Trust, Minot, North Dakota,  to merge with First Western Bank & Trust, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and incident thereto proposes to establish a branch at 100 Prairie Center Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable
|LEACKCO BANK HOLDING COMPANY, INC. | * 3A5          | Leackco Bank Holding Company, Inc., Wolsey, South Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of Kingsbury Bank Holding Company, De Smet, South Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire Peoples State Bank, De Smet, South Dakota.           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/06/2011    
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | 06/06/2011    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2011 (July 1, 2011 - September 30, 2011)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# National Maritime Day, 2007

America has a proud maritime history, and the United States Merchant Marine has played a vital role in helping meet our country's economic and national security needs. On National Maritime Day, we honor merchant mariners for their dedication to promoting commerce and protecting our freedom. 

During times of peace, the U.S. Merchant Marine helps ensure our economic security by keeping the oceans open to trade. Ships operated by merchant mariners transport goods across our Nation's waterways and on the high seas around the world to connect American businesses and consumers with valuable foreign markets and commodities. The skill and expertise of merchant mariners facilitates trade and helps to strengthen our economy. 

In times of war, the Merchant Marine is the lifeline of our troops overseas. By carrying critical supplies, equipment, and personnel, merchant mariners provide essential support to our Armed Forces and help advance the cause of freedom. Today, merchant mariners are supporting operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and their devotion to duty is a tribute to the generations of men and women who have served our Nation with courage and determination in every conflict in America's history. On this day, and throughout the year, America is grateful for their service. 

In recognition of the importance of the U.S. Merchant Marine, the Congress, by joint resolution approved on May 20, 1933, as amended, has designated May 22 of each year as  “National Maritime Day,” and has authorized and requested that the President issue an annual proclamation calling for its appropriate observance. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 22, 2007, as National Maritime Day. I call upon the people of the United States to mark this observance by honoring the service of merchant mariners and by displaying the flag of the United States at their homes and in their communities. I also request that all ships sailing under the American flag dress ship on that day. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2584

Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT
31.2


CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION





I, John
Venette, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oasis Online Technologies
Corp..





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;
and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: May
      13,  2008
              By:
              /s/ John
      VenetteJohn
      VenettePrincipal
      Financial Officer