alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 21, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01359-CV

JEFFREY LONGINO, Appellant

V.

HPA TEXAS SUB 2018-1 LLC C/O PATHLIGHT PROPERTY MGT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-03013-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Schenck

This is an appeal from the county court’s order in a forcible detainer action awarding 

appellee possession of appellant’s residence. A review of the record revealed that, following the 

filing of the appeal, a writ of possession was served and the property was turned over to appellee. 

Because an appeal in a forcible detainer action generally becomes moot when the appellant no 

longer has possession of the property, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. See Olley 

v. HVM, LLC, 449 S.W.3d 572, 575 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied). We 

directed appellant to file, within ten days, a letter brief addressing our concern and cautioned 

appellant that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See 
–2–

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). More than ten days have passed, but appellant has not responded. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id.; Olley, 449 S.W.3d at 575.

181359F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY LONGINO, Appellant

No. 05-18-01359-CV V.

HPA TEXAS SUB 2018-1 LLC C/O 

PATHLIGHT PROPERTY MGT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-03013-2018.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, 

Justices Osborne and Reichek participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellee HPA Texas Sub 2018-1 LLC c/o Pathlight Property Mgt recover its 

costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Jeffrey Longino.

Judgment entered this 21st day of May 2019.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(b)

                                                [Name]
                                                [Company]
                                                [Address1]
                                                [Address2]
                                                [CityStZip]

Dear [FirstName]:

I am pleased to advise you that the Board of Directors approved management's
recommendation to award a stock option grant to you, as one of our Key
Employees. This award is in recognition of the importance of your position with
the Company and the contribution we anticipate you will make to the improvement
in our Company's long-term performance.

Your options were awarded at the average stock price on the date of the grant.
Since stock options are intended to be a long-term incentive award, your options
vest over a three-year period. You were awarded _____ stock options at a grant
price of $____.

AS YOU KNOW, THERE ARE IMPORTANT SEC COMPLIANCE ISSUES RELATED TO THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 THAT MUST BE CONSIDERED AT THE TIME YOU CHOOSE TO
EXERCISE YOUR STOCK OPTIONS. PLEASE CONTACT __________ AT __________@SHERWIN.COM
(__________), OR __________ AT __________@SHERWIN.COM (__________), OR
__________ AT __________@SHERWIN.COM (__________) TO HELP ENSURE YOU MEET ALL
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS BEFORE EXERCISING YOUR OPTIONS.

In order to provide you full access to advanced stock option technology, we will
deliver your stock option program to you primarily by Internet and e-mail. All
plan documents are available on the ___ website (__________). We believe you
will be pleased with the tools you have at your disposal for managing this
important part of your compensation structure.

Your personal efforts to improve sales and profits while reducing expenses are
critical to our success. These activities will make us a stronger Company. We
expect your help in achieving these goals and together, we will position the
Company for continued success.

Sincerely,
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending March 22, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending July 3, 2010

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BANCTENN CORP.           | * 3A3         | BancTenn Corp., Kingsport Tennessee, to acquire up to 20 percent of the outstanding shares of Paragon Commercial Corporation, and its subsidiary, Paragon Commercial Bank, both of Raleigh, North Carolina.                                   | Newspaper:07/13/2010Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | 07/13/2010   
|Federal Register:        | Not available
|MANSURA BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | After-the-fact change in control notice filed by Anthony Jennings Roy, III, to retain 26.57 percent of the outstanding shares of Mansura Bancshares, Inc., Mansura, Louisiana, and its subsidiary, The Cottonport Bank, Cottonport, Louisiana | Newspaper:07/19/2010Federal Register:07/20/2010   
|Newspaper:               | 07/19/2010   
|Federal Register:        | 07/20/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|SUNTRUST BK, ATLANTA, GEORGIA | 675332 | 05/07/2007 | 06/22/2010     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leon O. Moulder, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Leon O. Moulder, Jr.Leon O. Moulder, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2005
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00766 (ABJ)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

Defendant,

and

CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM,

 Defendant,

and

HISPANIC LEADERSHIP FUND,

Defendant.

HISPANIC LEADERSHIP FUNDS NOTICE OF NO ADDITIONAL REPLY TO 

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

Defendant Hispanic Leadership Fund (HLF) relies on its Motion for Stay Pending Appeal 

and supporting Memorandum in response to Plaintiff’s Opposition. Additionally, HLF hereby 

adopts Defendant Center for Individual Freedom’s (CFIF’s) Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to 

Motion for Stay Pending Appeal filed April 17, 2012. (E.C.F., Docket # __). Defendant HLF 

will not be filing any additional reply.

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 59 Filed 04/17/12 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

Dated: April 17, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

Holtzman Vogel Josefiak PLLC

By: /s/

Jason Torchinsky (Bar No. 976033)

jtorchinsky@holtzmanlaw.net

HOLTZMAN VOGEL PLLC

45 North Hill Drive, Suite 100

Warrenton, VA 20186

Tel: (540) 341-8808

Fax: (540) 341-8809

Counsel for Hispanic Leadership Fund

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 59 Filed 04/17/12 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**OFFICERS’ CERTIFICATION**
     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer ofDiagnostic Products Corporation (“DPC”) that the Quarterly Report of DPC onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatthe information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of DPC at the end of such period and theresults of its operations for such period.     Dated November 13, 2003 /S/ Michael Ziering        Michael Ziering, Chief Executive Officer         /S/ James L. Brill        James L. Brill, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 535.991 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

This section displays the control number assigned to information collection requirements of the Commission in this part by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. The Commission intends that this section comply with the requirements of section 3507(a)(3) of the Paperwork Reduction Act, which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each agency information collection requirement in the following table:

| Section | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 535.101 through 535.902 | 3072-0045 |
EXHIBIT 32.2











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
C. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











BY:
            /s/
      Stephen C. RichterStephen
      C. RichterExecutive
      Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      1, 2010
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, April 3, 1995 (54), Para 54.14 After Recess--5:00 P.M.]
[Page 525]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.54.14  after recess--5:00 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, called the House 
to order.
```
#### § 30.10-2 Accommodation space—TB/ALL.

The term *accommodation space* means any public space such as a hall, dining room, mess room, lounge, corridor, lavatory, cabin, office, hospital, cinema, game and hobby room, pantry that contains no cooking appliances, and a similar space open to the passengers and crew.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3842, Jan. 26, 1976]
#### § 32.55-50 Ventilation of tankships that have a keel laying date on or after January 1, 1975—T/ALL.

Each tankship that has a keel laying date on or after January 1, 1975, must have deckhouse and superstructure ventilation inlets and outlets and other openings to the exterior arranged to minimize the admission of flammable gas to enclosed spaces that contain a source of ignition.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3844, Jan. 26, 1976]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1993             JUN-30-1992
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1992             JUL-01-1991
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1992             SEP-30-1991
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,977                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        16,278                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (34,255)                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                             00                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,746                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,746)                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                  48,541
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,746)                 48,541
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.00)                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
|32.1 | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive
Officer of Adino Energy Corporation, hereby certify that to my knowledge, Adino Energy Corporation’s quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the financial statements contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Adino Energy Corporation.



|                         | Date: August 14, 2012
|------------------------ | ---------------------
|                         |                      
|/s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr. |                      
|Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.     |
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   August12, 2010   /s/ Roy T.K. Thung* Roy T. K. Thung Chief Executive Officer and President   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 31, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 4.40-25 Coast Guard marine casualty investigation for the Board. ( a ) If the Board does not conduct an investigation under § 4.40-15 (a), (b) (2) or (3), the Coast Guard, at the request of the Board, may conduct an investigation under the Act unless there is an allegation of Federal Government misfeasance or nonfeasance.
( b ) The Board will request the Coast Guard to conduct an investigation under paragraph (a) of this section within 48 hours of receiving notice under § 4.40-10(c).
( c ) The Coast Guard will advise the Board within 24 hours of receipt of a request under paragraph (b) of this section whether the Coast Guard will conduct an investigation under the Act.
[CGD 82-034, 47 FR 45882, Oct. 14, 1982]
§ 69.73 Treatment of novel type vessels. ( a ) When application of this subpart to a novel type vessel produces unreasonable or impractical results, the Commandant may determine a more suitable method of measurement.
( b ) Requests for a determination must be submitted to the Commandant, explaining the reasons for seeking a determination, and including a description of the spaces in question, if applicable.
[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53225, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18722, Mar. 31, 2016]
#### § 545.2 Interpretation of Shipping Act of 1984—Unpaid ocean freight charges.

Section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 41102(a)) states that it is unlawful for any person to obtain or attempt to obtain transportation for property at less than the properly applicable rates, by any “unjust or unfair device or means.” An essential element of the offense is use of an “unjust or unfair device or means.” In the absence of evidence of bad faith or deceit, the Federal Maritime Commission will not infer an “unjust or unfair device or means” from the failure of a shipper to pay ocean freight. An “unjust or unfair device or means” could be inferred where a shipper, in bad faith, induced the carrier to relinquish its possessory lien on the cargo and to transport the cargo without prepayment by the shipper of the applicable freight charges.

[58 FR 7194, Feb. 5, 1993. Redesignated at 64 FR 7813, Feb. 17, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 50732, Oct. 1, 2009]
§ 535.404 Agreement provisions. Generally, each agreement should: ( a ) Indicate the full legal name of each party, including any FMC-assigned agreement number associated with that name, and the address of its principal office (not the address of any agent or representative not an employee of the participating party);
( b ) State the ports or port ranges to which the agreement applies as well as any inland points or areas to which it also applies; and
( c ) Specify, by organizational title, the administrative and executive officials determined by the agreement parties to be responsible for designated affairs of the agreement and the respective duties and authorities delegated to those officials. At a minimum, the agreement should specify: ( 1 ) The official(s) with authority to file the agreement and any modification thereto and to submit associated supporting materials; and
( 2 ) A statement as to any designated U.S. representative of the agreement required by this chapter.