alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 3, 2011

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION | 4c8            | Notice by Park National Corporation, Newark, Ohio, for approval for its subsidiary, SE Property Holdings, LLC, Newark, Ohio, to engage in credit extending activities, pursuant to Section 225.28(b)(1)of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:12/22/2011
|Newspaper:                | Not applicable
|Federal Register:         | 12/22/2011    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending June 2, 2007

|Filer                      | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|AMERICAN HERITAGE HOLDINGS | * 3A1       | American Heritage Holdings to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Borrego Springs Bank, N.A., both of La Mesa, California. | Newspaper:06/14/2007Federal Register:06/08/2007
|Newspaper:                 | 06/14/2007 
|Federal Register:          | 06/08/2007 
|FIRST COMMUNITY HOLDINGS   | * 3A1       | First Community Holdings to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of First Community Bank, both of Santa Rosa, California.      | Newspaper:06/25/2007Federal Register:06/25/2007
|Newspaper:                 | 06/25/2007 
|Federal Register:          | 06/25/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending June 20, 2009

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------ | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|AUSTIN BANCSHARES, INC.  | * 3A1         | Austin Bancshares, Inc., Austin, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of La Grange Bancshares, Inc., La Grange, Texas, and indirectly acquire Colorado Valley Bank, SSB, La Grange, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | Not available
|PREMIER BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Mr. James Edward Baxter, II, Richmond, Virginia, to acquire an interest in Premier Bancshares, Inc., McKinney, Texas, and indirectly acquire Synergy Bank, SSB, McKinney, Texas.                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Order filed August 24, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00429-CV

____________

ALYSSA SERRANO AND BILL SERRANO, Appellants

V.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-36592

ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed April 19, 2021. The notice of appeal 

was filed July 29, 2021. It appears the notice of appeal is untimely, but we are 

unable to make that determination because the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

We received notice from the clerk’s office that appellant has not made 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we enter the following 

order. 

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a clerk’s record on or 

before September 3, 2021, containing (1) the court’s judgment; (2) any request for 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, any post-judgment motion, and the court’s 

order on the motion; and (3) the notice of appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, Wilson.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending February 12, 2011

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANCA POPOLARE VICENZA SCPAARL | FBSEA          | Banca Popolare di Vicenza S.C.p.A, Vicenza, Italy, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not available 
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, May 12, 1995 (65), Para 65.12 Message from the President]
[Page 697]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.65.12  message from the president

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his secretaries.
```
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending August 20, 2011

----

Testimony and Statements            Banking Supervision and Regulation -- statement by Kevin M. Bertsch, associate director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, before a field hearing in Newnan, Georgia, of a subcommittee of the House Committee on Financial Services on the Federal Reserve's efforts to ensure a consistent approach to the examination of community banking organizations.            -Published, August 16, 2011            Enforcement            Coastal Bankshares, Inc., Savannah, Georgia -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Banking Commissioner of the State of Georgia.            -Announced, August 16, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### § 42.20-40 Standard height of superstructure.

(a) The standard height of a superstructure shall be as given in table [42.20-40(a)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-42.20-40#p-42.20-40(a)):

Table [42.20-40](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-42.20-40)(a) Standard Heights (in Feet)1

| Length (*L*) (in feet) | Raised quarter deck | All other super structures |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 98.5 or less | 3.0 | 5.9 |
| 246 | 3.9 | 5.9 |
| 410 or more | 5.9 | 7.5 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 The standard heights at intermediate lengths of the vessel shall be obtained by linear interpolation. | | |

[CGFR 68-60, [33 FR 10065](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/33-FR-10065), July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, [34 FR 9015](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/34-FR-9015), June 5, 1969]
§ 97.16-1 Use of auto pilot. Except as provided in 33 CFR 164.15, when the automatic pilot is used in— ( a ) Areas of high traffic density;
( b ) Conditions of restricted visibility; and
( c ) All other hazardous navigational situations, the master shall ensure that— ( 1 ) It is possible to immediately establish manual control of the ship's steering;
( 2 ) A competent person is ready at all times to take over steering control;
( 3 ) The changeover from automatic to manual steering and vice versa is made by, or under, the supervision of the officer of the watch.
[CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 25, 2006

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|EHPW Acquisition Company | * 3A5* 3A1    | EHPW Acquisition Company, Harrisburg, PA, to form a bank holding company by acquiring Vartan National Bank, Harrisburg, PA, pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act. In addition, EHPW Acquisition Company, Harrisburg, PA, to acquire Vartan Financial Corporation, Harrisburg, PA, pursuant Section 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act. | Newspaper:12/26/2006Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | 12/26/2006   
|Federal Register:        | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2007 (January 1, 2007 - March 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 71.65-15 Procedure for submittal of plans. ( a ) As the relative location of shipyards, design offices, and Coast Guard offices vary throughout the country, no specific routing will be required in the submittal of plans. In general, one of the following procedures would apply, but in a particular case, if a more expeditious procedure can be used, there will be no objection to its adoption: ( 1 ) The plans may be submitted to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in the district in which the vessel is to be built. This procedure will be most expeditious in the case of those offices where personnel and facilities are available for examination and approval of the plans locally.
( 2 ) The plans may be submitted by visitors directly to the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593, or transmitted by mail to: Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430, in a written or electronic format. Information for submitting the VSP electronically can be found at *http://www.uscg.mil/HQ/MSC .* In this case, the plans will be returned directly to the submitter, with a copy of the action being forwarded to the interested Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( 3 ) In the case of classed vessels, upon specific request by the submitter, the American Bureau of Shipping will arrange to forward the necessary plans to the Coast Guard indicating its action thereon. In this case, the plans will be returned as noted in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16895, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by 60 FR 50463, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 54106, Oct. 19, 1995; USCG-2007-29018, 72 FR 53965, Sept. 21, 2007; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49231, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60150, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35091, July 28, 2017]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES T. FRENCH, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CR-95-64-JHM)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James T. French, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James T. French, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record

and the district court order and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. French, No. CR-95-64-JHM (W.D. Va. Nov. 19, 2001).

We also deny French’s motion for appointment of counsel and for a

copy of the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 8, 1995 (76), Para 76.27 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 886]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.76.27  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XXIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. HYDE: Committee on the Judiciary. H.R. 962. A bill to 
     amend the Immigration Act of 1990 relating to the membership 
     of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform (Rept. No. 104-
     135). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
       Mr. SOLOMON: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 164. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R.1530) 
     to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military 
     activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe 
     military personnel strengths for fiscal year 1996, and for 
     other purposes (Rept. No. 104-136). Referred to the House 
     Calendar.
```
#### The Rio Grande Western Ry. Co., Appellant, v. Vaughn, Appellee.

CONSTITÜTÍOMAL LAW.

The railroad stock-killing act is unconstitutional.

*Appeal from the County Court of Mesa County.*

Mr. Charles F. Caswell, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action to recover damages for the killing of a horse belonging to the appellee, plaintiff below. The case was commenced before a justice of the peace and there were no written pleadings. It was appealed to the county court, where judgment was rendered against the defendant for $200 *466damages for the killing of the horse, and $100 attorneys’ fees. None of the evidence is preserved in the record, so that we are unadvised as to whether a recovery by plaintiff would have been authorized by the rules of the common lawbut even if so, the judgment is erroneous, because the finding of the court is that the value of the horse was $100, and that sum, therefore, would be the limit of recovery.

The judgment, however, is in terms based upon the statutory, and not the common law, liability of the defendant. It is conceded that the plaintiff complied with the statutory requirements, and, unider the evidence, was entitled to the judgment which was rendered in his favor, provided the statute itself is valid. The sole question presented by the argument is as to the constitutionality of sections 13 and 14, chapter 93, of the General Statutes of Colorado, and the subsequent amendments to section 14. This section was amended by an act approved March 31, 1885 (Session Laws of 1885, page 304); and again, by an act approved April 6, 1891 (Session Laws 1891, page 281). Neither of the amendments made any substantial change in the original section, and they did not differ materially from each other.

The constitutional question presented has been settled in this state, both by the Supreme Court and by this court. *Wadsworth v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.,*18 Colo. 600; D. *&*R. *G. Ry. Co. v. Outcalt,*2 Colo. App. 395.

In both of these cases the law was held unconstitutional. The judgment is reversed, with leave to the plaintiff, if he so desires, to proceed to a new trial in accordance with common law principles.

*Reversed.*