alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,684
<PP&E>                                         199,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,720
<BONDS>                                         11,053
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,959
<SALES>                                         24,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,720
<CGS>                                            5,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,456
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,456
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22


</TABLE>
# C_2012133EN.01002002.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/20

---

Action brought on 9 March 2012 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-130/12)

2012/C 133/37

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2009/113/EC (1) of 25 August 2009 amending Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences, or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of such provisions, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2009/113/EC (1) of 25 August 2009 amending Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences, or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of such provisions, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposing the directive expired on 14 September 2010.

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 223, p. 31.

1

---
#### § 502.116 Date of service.

The date of service of documents served by the Commission will be the date shown in the service stamp placed on the first page of the document. The date of service of documents served by parties will be the date when the document served is transmitted by email, deposited in the United States mail, delivered to a courier, or delivered in person. If service is made by more than one method, for example email and also U.S. mail service, the date of service will be the earlier of the two dates. In computing the time from such dates, the provisions of § 502.101 shall apply. [Rule 116.]

[80 FR 57307, Sept. 23, 2015]
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form
S-3, No. 333-22105 and Form S-8, No. 333-04377 pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Option Plan) of Able Telcom Holding Corp. of our report dated January 19, 1998,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Able
Telcom Holding Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended October 31, 1997.

West Palm Beach, Florida
February 9, 1998                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 10, 2005

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|NORTHAMPTON CO-OPERATIVE BANK | Member         | Application by Northampton Cooperative Bank, Northampton, MA, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act and section 208.3 of Regulation H                                                         | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | Not applicable
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|NORTHERN BANCORP, INC.        | CIC            | Notice pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978 by Joseph A. Riley who would become a member of a group of related family interests that currently owns greater than 25% of the voting shares of Northern Bancorp, Inc., Woburn, Massachusetts. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available  
|Newspaper:                    | Not available 
|Federal Register:             | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
GENERAL ASSIGNMENT AND BILL OF SALE


         FOR VALUABLE  CONSIDERATION,  and in  performance of that certain Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2000 (the "Purchase Agreement"), by
and between Alpha Ceramics, Inc. ("Buyer"),  and Aura Ceramics, Inc. ("Seller"),
Seller does hereby sell, transfer,  assign,  convey and deliver forever to Buyer
all of Seller's rights,  title and interest in and to the following  properties,
assets and rights of Seller:

     Any and all tangible and intangible assets and personal property of Seller,
other than the Retained Assets,  including,  without limitation,  the Equipment,
Intangible Property,  Trademarks and Patents,  Inventory,  Licenses and Permits,
Real Estate Leases and Subleases,  Contracts, Accounts Receivable,  Goodwill and
the name of the Business "Aura Ceramics,  Inc.", wherever the aforementioned may
be located.

         Seller  warrants,  represents and covenants that it is the lawful owner
of the properties, assets and rights transferred hereby and has the lawful right
to sell the same, free and clear of any claim,  lien or encumbrance  whatsoever,
and that Seller will forever warrant and defend title thereto against the claims
of any and all persons.

         Seller  further  agrees to  execute  and  deliver  any and all  further
assignments  and  instruments  reasonably  required  by the  Buyer  in  order to
effectively  assign  to and vest in Buyer  all of  Seller's  rights,  title  and
interests in and to the assets, property and rights sold hereunder.

         This  General  Assignment  and Bill of Sale shall bind the Seller,  its
successors  and  assigns,  and  shall  benefit  the  Buyer  and  its  respective
successors and assigns.

         Capitalized  terms not otherwise  defined herein shall have the meaning
ascribed to them in the Purchase Agreement.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Aura  Ceramics,  Inc.  has caused  this  General
Assignment and Bill of Sale to be executed as of the 3rd day of May, 2000.


                                                             AURA CERAMICS, INC.


                                                              By
                                                                  Its:


                                                              By
                                                                  Its:
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), W. Douglas
Parker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Derek J. Kerr, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. /s/ W. Douglas Parker
Name:  W. Douglas Parker
Title:  Chief Executive
OfficerDate:  October 23, 2008 /s/ Derek J. Kerr
Name:  Derek J. Kerr
Title:  Chief Financial
OfficerDate:  October 23, 2008 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical Computing and Health Informatics Study Section, June 14, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 15, 2007, 5 p.m., Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 24, 2007, 72 FR 20352-20354.                

The meeting will be held June 15, 2007, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2298 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

COLLIE ANDERSON, 

Petitioner, 

 Case No. 15-12464 

v. HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

SHANE PLACE, 

Respondent. 

 / 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR WRIT RETURN IN PERSON 

 The Court has before it Michigan prisoner Collie Anderson’s “Motion for Writ 

Return in Person” concerning his habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The Court, however, previously dismissed the petition without prejudice on October 

19, 2015 for failure to correct a filing fee deficiency. Petitioner’s motion is therefore 

moot. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s “Motion for Writ Return in 

Person.” This case is CLOSED. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

4:15-cv-12464-TGB-PTM Doc # 11 Filed 10/27/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 23
2

 Should Petitioner wish to proceed with a federal habeas action, he must 

submit a new habeas petition, along with payment of the filing fee or an in forma 

pauperis application. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 27, 2015 s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on October 27, 

2015, using the CM/ECF system; a copy of this Order was also mailed to the Baraga 

Maximum Correctional Facility, 13924 Wadaga Rd., Baraga, MI 49908 directed to 

Petitioner’s attention. 

 s/K. Winslow 

Case Manager Generalist 

4:15-cv-12464-TGB-PTM Doc # 11 Filed 10/27/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 24
CALL BY:

CALL TO: David Enman Organization: Nantero, Inc.
Date: 04/01/2015
Time: 10:00 AM

PMN: 15

- 0276 Organization:

Phone:
Concerning what TSCA CBI? MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

Q1: Is there any point in the manufacturing/post

- processing of the PMN where it is handled as a dry solid (not in dispersion or slurry)? | A1: The only point where raw nanotubes are handled are in the very first ste p of the process, where nanotubes are transferred in a glove box into liquid to make a dispersion [Note: the submission indicates that the raw materials in this step are for the raw nanotubes - not the final product].| //| Q2: Can you confirm that the spra y coating enclosure described in Attachment 4 would be sufficient to prevent worker exposures?| A2: We currently do not use the spray coating process - we only use the spin coat, but wanted to have the option for spray coat. The coating process is containe d in the "mini environment" under negative pressure, so all of the spray coating excess is expected to be pulled into the exhaust air. This is also necessary to maintain a uniform coating on the wafer. Also, the amount coated is very small - 3ml over a per iod of up to 60 seconds.CALL BY:

CALL TO: David Enman Organization: Nantero, Inc.
Date: 03/27/2015
Time:

PMN: 15

- 0276 Organization:

Phone:
Concerning what TSCA CBI? CBI: Yes
MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

Q 1: why are you claiming identical releases from the manufacturing sites that are not under your control.| A1: these sites will not be toll manufacturers but we will license the technolgoy to them and I think our agreement with them includes provisions rela ted to the meida of release of wastes. This submission is similar to our previous submission.| | Q2: | A2: | | Q3: | A3: | | Q4: | A4:
§ 78.17-33 Loading doors. ( a ) The master of a vessel fitted with loading doors shall assure that all loading doors are closed watertight and secured during the entire voyage except that— ( 1 ) If a door cannot be opened or closed while the vessel is at a dock, it may be open while the vessel approaches and draws away from the dock, but only as far as necessary to enable the door to be immediately operated.
( 2 ) If needed to operate the vessel, or embark and disembark passengers when the vessel is at anchor in protected waters, loading doors may be open provided that the master determines that the safety of the vessel is not impaired.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, “loading doors” include all weathertight ramps, bow visors, and openings used to load personnel, equipment, and stores, located in the collision bulkhead, the side shell, or the boundaries of enclosed superstructures that are continuous with the shell of the vessel.
( c ) The master shall enter into the log book the time and door location of every closing of the loading doors.
( d ) The master shall enter into the log book any opening of the doors in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section setting forth the time of the opening of the doors and the circumstances warranting this action.
[CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41822, Sept. 11, 1992]
§ 76.33-90 Installations contracted for prior to November 19, 1952. ( a ) Installations contracted for prior to November 19, 1952, must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Existing arrangements, material, and equipment previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as they meet the minimum requirements of this paragraph and they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standards as the original installation.
( 2 ) The details of the systems must be in general agreement with §§ 76.27-5 through 76.27-35 insofar as is reasonable and practicable.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16940, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48259, July 22, 2016]
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                          |                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                                                          | /s/ Jack              Rhian |
|   | Jack                RhianChief                Executive Officer and President |

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.**

----
NO. 07-03-00390-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

OCTOBER 29, 2003

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF

LOREEN ANN MAYEUX AND DOUGLAS WAYNE MAYEUX

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 67,510-D; HONORABLE RICHARD DAMBOLD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Proceeding pro se, appellant Douglas Wayne Mayeux filed a notice of appeal

challenging the trial court’s order of June 26, 2003. On September 24, 2003, the trial court

clerk filed a request for extension of time to file the clerk’s record indicating Mayeux’s intent

not to pay the remaining balance for the record because he no longer wished to prosecute

this appeal. As a precaution, by letter dated September 24, the clerk was granted an

extension and Mayeux was directed to certify to this Court by Tuesday, October 14, 2003,
2

whether he had complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, noting that failure

to do so might result in dismissal. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Mayeux did not respond and

the clerk’s record has not been filed.

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to

comply with this Court’s directive. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) & (c).

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
89–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–86

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1699, COAST

GUARD AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2001

JUNE 5, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 155]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 155, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1699, the Coast

Guard Authorization Act of 2001, under a modified open rule. The

rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

The rule provides that the bill be open for amendment at any

point. The rule makes in order only those amendments printed in

the Congressional Record and pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. The rule further provides that each amendment

printed in the Congressional Record may be offered only by the

Member who caused it to be printed or his designee, and that each

amendment shall be considered as read. The rule also provides one

motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Finally, section 2 of the rule provides that House Resolutions

130, 147, 149, and 150 are laid on the table.

Æ