alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Interlink  Electronics,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/S/  CHARLES C. BEST
-------------------------------------
Charles C. Best
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
July 24, 2006
§ 76.01-1 General; preemptive effect. ( a ) The provisions of this part shall apply to all vessels except as specifically noted in this part.
( b ) The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
[ CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16940, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33875, June 7, 2012]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Berry, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                          
|/s/ Michael J. Berry                                                                                                      
|Michael J. Berry                                                                                                          
|Executive Vice President, Finance and Accounting, and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|March 9, 2009                                                                                                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.0
                     Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Tracor, Inc.
Cordant, Inc.
Cordant Federal Services Corporation
GDE Holdings, Inc.
ADR Associates, Inc.
GDE Systems, Inc.
GDE Systems Imaging, Inc.
GDESI, Inc.
HealthCom, Inc.
Helava Associates, Inc.
Rokar International, Ltd.
Tracor Aerospace, Inc.
Tracor Aerospace Electronic Systems, Inc.
Tracor Applied Sciences, Inc.
Tracor Australia PTY Limited
Tracor Flight Systems, Inc.
Tracor FSC, Inc.
Tracor Holdings, Inc.
Tracor Information Systems Company
Tracor Marine, Inc.
Vitro Corporation
Quality Systems, Inc.
Vitro Systems International Corporation
Vitro Sciences International
Vitro Services Corporation
Vitro Technical Services, Inc.
Westmark Services Company, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (STERLING
WEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES)CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,413
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              99
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,130
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,741
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,713
<LOANS>                                         62,684
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,772
<DEPOSITS>                                      94,377
<SHORT-TERM>                                       900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                874
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,686
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,065)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 102,772
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,428
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  696
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,124
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,244
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,880
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,039
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 619
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (638)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,456
<LOANS-PAST>                                        13
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      817
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,476
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

_______________________________, 

 Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. __________________ 

 HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH

_______________________________,

 Defendant(s). 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT (Dkt. ___) 

The Court has reviewed the following document: ________________________________

(Dkt. ____). The Court finds that it should be stricken for the following reason(s): 

 Missing statement of concurrence. See LR 7.1(a).

 Over-length. See LR 7.1(d)(3).

 Wrong font size. See LR 5.1(a)(3).

 Missing required information (e.g., concise statement of issues, controlling or most 

appropriate authority, etc.). See LR 7.1(d)(2).

 Improperly formatted (e.g., single-spaced, improper margins, missing page numbers,

etc.). See LR 5.1(a)(2).

 Does not comply with the Case Management Order in this case for the following reasons:

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________.

Robert Trevor-Blair Davis, Sr

15-12076

Carla Robert and Suzanne Hall

Defendant Robert's Motion for Summary Judgment

34

34

✔

2:15-cv-12076-MAG-DRG Doc # 35 Filed 04/05/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 562
 Other:__________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________.

Accordingly, the Court strikes the document. ______________________ shall file an amended 

document that complies with all requirements on or before ____________________.

SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Detroit, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class 

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on ______________________.

.DUUL6DQGXVN\

Case Manager 

Failure to include the local rule certification required by

Defendant Robert

April 7, 2016

s/ Mark A. Goldsmith

April 5, 2016

s/ Karri Sandusky

Court order (Dkt. 8)

April 5, 2016

✔

2:15-cv-12076-MAG-DRG Doc # 35 Filed 04/05/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 563
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, April 4, 1995 (55), Para 55.9 Truth-in-Lending Class Action]
[Page 529]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.55.9  truth-in-lending class action

  Mrs. ROUKEMA moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1380) 
to provide a moratorium on certain class action lawsuits relating to the 
Truth in Lending Act.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNNING, recognized Mrs. ROUKEMA and Mr. 
VENTO, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. BUNNING, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US Airways Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), W.
Douglas Parker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Derek J. Kerr, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ W. Douglas Parker
Name:  W. Douglas Parker
Title:  Chief Executive
OfficerDate:  October 23, 2008 /s/ Derek J. Kerr
Name:  Derek J. Kerr
Title:  Chief Financial
OfficerDate:  October 23, 2008 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 29, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 64.31 Inspection opening.

An MPT must have an inspection opening that is designed in accordance with Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 64.2).

[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50199, June 12, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 106.10 Process for issuing rules. ( a ) PHMSA (“we”) uses informal rulemaking procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) to add, amend, or delete regulations. To propose or adopt changes to a regulation, PHMSA may issue one or more of the following documents. We publish the following rulemaking documents in the Federal Register unless we name and personally serve a copy of a rule on every person subject to it: ( 1 ) An advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
( 2 ) A notice of proposed rulemaking.
( 3 ) A final rule.
( 4 ) An interim final rule.
( 5 ) A direct final rule.
( b ) Each of the rulemaking documents in paragraph (a) of this section generally contains the following information: ( 1 ) The topic involved in the rulemaking document.
( 2 ) PHMSA's legal authority for issuing the rulemaking document.
( 3 ) How interested persons may participate in the rulemaking proceeding (for example, by filing written comments or making oral presentations).
( 4 ) Whom to call if you have questions about the rulemaking document.
( 5 ) The date, time, and place of any public meetings being held to discuss the rulemaking document.
( 6 ) The docket number and regulation identifier number (RIN) for the rulemaking proceeding.
[67 FR 42954, June 25, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

NEAL WINNIE and 

SARI ABROMOVICH, Case No. 2:15-cv-11994 

Plaintiffs, 

 Hon. Victoria A. Roberts 

v 

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE 

SERVICES, LLC 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 This matter is before the Court pursuant to the stipulation of the parties as 

evidenced by the signature of their counsel below; and the Court being otherwise 

fully advised. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint filed by NEAL WINNIE and SARI 

ABROMOVICH against CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC is 

dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 10, 2015 S/Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

STIPULATED TO BY: 

 /s/ Angela K. Howell /s/ Thomas G. Costello 

ANGELA K. HOWELL (P70129) THOMAS G. COSTELLO (P42973) 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

Case 2:15-cv-11994-VAR-APP ECF No. 11 filed 12/10/15 PageID.37 Page 1 of 1
§ 1104.4 Attestation and verification. ( a ) *Signature of attorney or practitioner.* If a party is represented by a practitioner or an attorney, the original of each paper filed should be signed in ink by the practitioner or attorney, whose address should be stated. The signature of a practitioner or attorney constitutes a certification that the representative: ( 1 ) Has read the pleading, document or paper;
( 2 ) Is authorized to file it;
( 3 ) Believes that there is good ground for the document;
( 4 ) Has not interposed the document for delay; A pleading, document or paper thus signed need not be verified or accompanied by affidavit unless required elsewhere in these rules.
( b ) *Signature by one not authorized to represent others before the Board.* The original of each document not signed by a practitioner or attorney must be: ( 1 ) Signed in ink;
( 2 ) Accompanied by the signer's address; and
( 3 ) Verified, if it contains allegations of fact, under oath by the person, in whose behalf it is filed, or by a duly authorized officer of the corporation in whose behalf it is filed. If the pleading is a complaint, at least one complainant must sign and verify the pleading.
[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 20, 2010

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|AMERISERV FINANCIAL BANK              | * Branch       | AmeriServ Financial Bank, Johnstown, PA, to establish a branch office located at 1857 North Atherton Street, State College, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable
|WARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P. | CIC            | Warburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P., New York, NY, to acquire up to 19.7% of National Penn Bancshares, Inc, Boyertown, PA.    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/08/2010    
|Newspaper:                            | Not available 
|Federal Register:                     | 12/08/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2011 (January 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Jacob Heidinger, *Respondent, v.*Charles F. Hine and another, Appellants.—

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1826 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1826

  To repeal the authorization of transitional appropriations for the 
         United States Postal Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1995

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the authorization of transitional appropriations for the 
         United States Postal Service, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--(1) Section 2004 of title 39, United States Code, 
is repealed.
    (2)(A) The table of sections for chapter 20 of such title is 
amended by repealing the item relating to section 2004.
    (B) Section 2003(e)(2) of such title is amended by striking 
``sections 2401 and 2004'' each place it appears and inserting 
``section 2401''.
    (b) Clarification That Liabilities Formerly Paid Pursuant to 
Section 2004 Remain Liabilities Payable by the Postal Service.--Section 
2003 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(h) Liabilities of the former Post Office Department to the 
Employees' Compensation Fund (appropriations for which were authorized 
by former section 2004, as in effect before the effective date of this 
subsection) shall be liabilities of the Postal Service payable out of 
the Fund.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of enactment of this Act or October 1, 1995, whichever is 
later.
                                 <all>
```