Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31127 

EIS process, the purpose and need, 

alternatives, and anticipated impact 

issues are available from The T. See 

ADDRESSES above. 

II. Description of the Study Area and 

Project Purpose and Need 

The study area for the EIS evaluation 

is the travelshed from southwest Fort 

Worth, through downtown Fort Worth, 

to DFW Airport, which is a distance of 

approximately 36 miles. The purpose of 

the proposed action is to improve 

mobility between and among activity 

centers in the corridor, provide 

multimodal solutions for mobility in the 

corridor that help mitigate congestion 

and improve air quality, and provide a 

transportation solution that interacts 

seamlessly and efficiently with other 

transportation systems in the region. 

FTA and The T seek comment on the 

project’s purpose and need. More details 

are available in the scoping information 

packet. See ADDRESSES above. 

The relationships of concurrent 

projects, such as the State Highway (SH) 

121 Southwest Parkway (currently in 

final design) being conducted by the 

Texas Department of Transportation 

(TxDOT) and the North Texas Tollway 

Authority (NTTA); the Interstate 

Highway 35 West (I–35W also 

commonly referred to as IH 35W) 

Corridor Improvement Study (CIS) by 

TxDOT; the Loop 820 East Corridor 

Environmental Assessment (EA); the 

SH–121/SH–183 (Airport Freeway) CIS; 

the SH–114/SH–121 (DFW Connector) 

CIS; the Loop 820 Northeast Corridor 

CIS; and others, will also be considered 

in the EIS process. 

III. Alternatives To Be Considered 

The alternatives evaluated in the EIS 

will include, but not be limited to, the 

preliminary Locally Preferred 

Alternative (LPA) developed in the AA 

and adopted by The T’s Executive 

Committee in November 2006. This 

alternative consists of regional rail using 

portions of the FWWR, UPRR, BNSF, 

and DART-owned Cotton Belt rail 

alignments between southwest Fort 

Worth and the north entrance to DFW 

Airport. Feeder bus improvements are 

also included as part of the 

recommended LPA. Eleven stations 

were proposed on the alignment during 

the AA: Altamesa Boulevard/Dirks 

Road; I–20 and Granbury Road; Berry/ 

Texas Christian University (TCU); 

Medical Center; Texas and Pacific (T&P) 

Terminal (existing); the Fort Worth 

Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) 

(existing); Stockyards/23rd; Beach 

Street; Grapevine/Main Street; DFW 

Airport—North; and DFW Airport—

Terminal A/B. 

The EIS will examine these and other 

reasonable alternatives that emerge from 

the scoping process. The EIS will also 

evaluate the appropriate end-of-line and 

associated facilities and connections 

with the Trinity Railway Express (TRE) 

and a potential future connection with 

the DART light rail system at DFW 

Airport. As part of the evaluation, 

station locations, rail vehicle storage 

and maintenance facilities, and other 

ancillary facilities, such as stormwater 

management systems, will be identified 

and studied as appropriate. 

The EIS will also evaluate the future 

No-Build Alternative and a TSM 

Alternative. Other alternatives may be 

added as a result of scoping and agency 

coordination efforts. 

IV. Probable Impacts for Analysis 

The EIS evaluation will analyze 

social, economic, and environmental 

impacts of the alternatives. Major issues 

to be evaluated include air quality, 

noise and vibration, aesthetics, 

community cohesion impacts, and 

possible disruption of neighborhoods, 

businesses and commercial activities. 

The impact areas and level of detail 

addressed in the EIS will be consistent 

with the requirements of SAFETEA–LU 

Section 6002 and the FTA/Federal 

Highway Administration environmental 

regulation (Environmental Impact and 

Related Procedures, 23 CFR 771 and 40 

CFR 1500–1508) and other 

environmental and related regulations. 

Among other factors, the EIS will 

evaluate: 

• Transportation service including 

future corridor capacity; 

• Transit ridership and costs; 

• Traffic movements and changes and 

associated impacts to local facilities; 

• Community impacts such as land 

use, displacements, noise and vibration, 

neighborhood compatibility and 

aesthetics; and 

• Resource impacts including impacts 

to historic and archeological resources, 

parklands, cultural resource impacts, 

environmental justice, and natural 

resource impacts including air quality, 

wetlands, water quality, wildlife, and 

vegetation. 

The proposed impact assessment and 

evaluation will take into account both 

positive and negative impacts, direct 

and indirect impacts, short-term (during 

the construction period) and long-term 

impacts, and site-specific as well as 

corridor-wide and cumulative impacts. 

Mitigation measures will be considered 

for any adverse environmental impacts 

identified. Other potential impacts may 

be added as a result of scoping and 

agency coordination efforts. 

V. Anticipated Federal Approvals 

In accordance with FTA policy, FTA 

and The T will coordinate compliance 

with all applicable Federal 

environmental laws, regulations, and 

executive orders during the NEPA 

process. Federal approvals anticipated 

to be required for implementing the 

recommended preliminary Locally 

Preferred Alternative include: 

• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’

Section 404 Permit in accordance with 

the Clean Water Act; 

• Trinity Corridor Development 

Certificate Permit in accordance with 

North Central Texas Council of 

Governments’ (NCTCOG’s) Trinity River 

Common Vision Program; 

• Section 4(f) evaluation in 

accordance with 49 USC 303; and 

• Section 106 review in accordance 

with the National Historic Preservation 

Act. 

Issued on: May 30, 2007. 

Robert C. Patrick, 

Regional Administrator, Federal Transit 

Administration, Fort Worth, Texas. 

[FR Doc. E7–10762 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–57–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Fiscal Service 

Surety Companies Acceptable on 

Federal Bonds Termination; American 

International Insurance Company of 

Puerto Rico 

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, 

Fiscal Service, Department of the 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 12 to 

the Treasury Department Circular 570, 

2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006 

at 71 FR 37694. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–6850. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the Certificate of 

Authority issued by the Treasury to the 

above-named company under 31 U.S.C. 

9305 to qualify as an acceptable surety 

on Federal bonds was terminated 

effective May 24, 2007. Federal bondapproving officials should annotate 

their reference copies of the Treasury 

Department Circular 570 (‘‘Circular’’), 

2006 Revision, to reflect this change. 

With respect to any bonds currently 

in force with the above listed company, 

bond-approving officers may let such 

bonds run to expiration and need not 

secure new bonds. However, no new 

bonds should be accepted from this 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
31128 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 

company, and bonds that are 

continuous in nature should not be 

renewed. 

The Circular may be viewed and 

downloaded through the internet at 

http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. 

Questions concerning this notice may 

be directed to the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, Financial Management 

Service, Financial Accounting and 

Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 

3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, 

Hyattsville, MD 20782. 

Dated: May 24, 2007. 

Vivian L. Cooper, 

Director, Financial Accounting and Services 

Division, Financial Management Service. 

[FR Doc. 07–2780 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–35–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Fiscal Service 

Surety Companies Acceptable on 

Federal Bonds—Terminations: The 

Buckeye Union Insurance Company, 

The Fidelity and Casualty Company of 

New York; Firemen’s Insurance 

Company of Newark, NJ 

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, 

Fiscal Service, Department of the 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 11 to 

the Treasury Department Circular 570, 

2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, 

at 71 FR 37694. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the Certificates of 

Authority issued by the Treasury to the 

above-named companies under 31 

U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as acceptable 

sureties on Federal bonds have been 

terminated. The above-named 

companies merged with and into The 

Continental Insurance Company 

effective December 31, 2006. The 

surviving corporation of the merger 

activity is The Continental Insurance 

Company, a Pennsylvania domiciled 

corporation. Federal bond-approving 

officials should annotate their reference 

copies of the Treasury Department 

Circular 570 (‘‘Circular’’), 2006 

Revision, to reflect these changes. 

In the event bond-approving officers 

have questions relating to bonds issued 

by the above-named companies that 

have merged with and into The 

Continental Insurance Company, they 

should contact The Continental 

Insurance Company at (877) 262–2727. 

The Circular may be viewed and 

downloaded through the internet at 

http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. 

Questions concerning this notice may 

be directed to the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, Financial Management 

Service, Financial Accounting and 

Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 

3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, 

Hyattsville, MD 20782. 

Dated: May 24, 2007. 

Vivian L. Cooper, 

Director, Financial Accounting and Services 

Division, Financial Management Service. 

[FR Doc. 07–2779 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–35–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Fiscal Service 

Surety Companies Acceptable on 

Federal Bonds: Change in State of 

Incorporation; the Continental 

Insurance Company 

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, 

Fiscal Service, Department of the 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 10 to 

the Treasury Department Circular 570, 

2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, 

at 71 FR 37694. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–6850. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Continental Insurance Company has 

redomesticated from the state of South 

Carolina to the state of Pennsylvania, 

effective October 1, 2006. 

Federal bond-approving officers 

should annotate their reference copies 

of the Treasury Department Circular 570 

(‘‘Circular’’), 2006 revision, to reflect 

this change. 

The Circular may be viewed and 

downloaded through the Internet at 

http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. 

Questions concerning this notice may 

be directed to the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, Financial Management 

Service, Funds Management Division, 

Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 

Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 

20782. 

Dated: May 24, 2007. 

Vivian L. Cooper, 

Director, Financial Accounting and Services 

Division, Financial Management Service. 

[FR Doc. 07–2778 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–35–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 8825 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is 

soliciting comments concerning Form 

8825, Rental Real Estate Income and 

Expenses of a Partnership or an S 

Corporation. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before August 6, 2007 to 

be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue 

Service, room 6516, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the form and instructions 

should be directed to Carolyn N. Brown 

at Internal Revenue Service, room 6516, 

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20224, or at (202) 622–

6688, or through the Internet at 

Carolyn.N.Brown@irs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Rental Real Estate Income and 

Expenses of a Partnership or an S 

Corporation. 

OMB Number: 1545–1186. 

Form Number: Form 8825. 

Abstract: Partnerships and S 

corporations file Form 8825 with either 

Form 1065 or Form 1120S to report 

income and deductible expenses from 

rental real estate activities, including 

net income or loss from rental real estate 

activities that flow through from 

partnerships, estate, or trusts. The IRS 

uses the information on the form to 

verify that partnerships and S 

corporations have correctly reported 

their income and expenses from rental 

real estate property. 

Current Actions: There are no changes 

being made to the form at this time. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES