Filed: March 28, 2013 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1410

(5-CA-36213; 5-CA-36214; 5-CA-36216; 

5-CA-36306; 5-CA-36225)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner,

v.

ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC.; ECI OF WASHINGTON, LLC, alter 

egos,

Respondents,

ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL 24 APPRENTICESHIP FUND; ASBESTOS 

WORKERS LOCAL 24 PENSION FUND; ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL 24 

MEDICAL FUND,

Intervenors.

O R D E R

The Court amends its opinion filed March 28, 2013, as 

follows:

On the cover sheet, agency information section, “On 

Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Labor Relations 

Authority” is corrected to read “On Application for Enforcement 

of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board”

For the Court – By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1410

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner,

v.

ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC.; ECI OF WASHINGTON, LLC, alter 

egos,

Respondents,

ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL 24 APPRENTICESHIP FUND; ASBESTOS 

WORKERS LOCAL 24 PENSION FUND; ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL 24 

MEDICAL FUND,

Intervenors.

On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor 

Relations Board. (NLRB-1 5-CA-36213; 5-CA-36214; 5-CA-36216; 5-

CA-36306; 5-CA-36225)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition granted by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Lafe E. Solomon, 

Acting General Counsel, Celeste J. Mattina, Deputy General 

Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda 

Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Gregoire Sauter, 
2

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for 

Petitioner. Kenneth C. Gauvey, OFFIT KURMAN, P.A., Owings 

Mills, Maryland, for Respondent. John R. Mooney, Andrew K. Lin, 

MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, P.C., Washington, D.C., 

for Intervenors.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) seeks 

enforcement of a Board order against Engineering Contractors, 

Inc. (“Respondent”). The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) 

concluded that Respondent violated § 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of 

the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. 

§ 158(a)(1), (3), (5) (2006), and ordered remedial measures. 

The Board adopted the ALJ’s recommended order in full. 

Respondent opposes the Board’s petition for 

enforcement, contending that the remedies ordered by the ALJ 

were overreaching and impermissibly punitive. We conclude that 

we lack jurisdiction to consider Respondent’s contentions

because Respondent failed to raise its objections to the 

remedies ordered in the proceedings before the Board. See 29 

U.S.C. § 160(e) (2006) (“No objection that has not been urged 

before the Board . . . shall be considered by the court, unless 

the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused 

because of extraordinary circumstances.”); Woelke & Romero 

Framing, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 456 U.S. 645, 665 (1982) (barring 

from judicial review issues not raised before Board); 

N.L.R.B. v. Daniel Constr. Co., 731 F.2d 191, 198 (4th Cir. 

1984) (same). 
4

Accordingly, we grant the Board’s motion to submit the 

case on briefs and the petition for enforcement. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION GRANTED