alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 72.40-5 Where rails required. ( a ) All passenger vessels shall have efficient guard rails or bulwarks on decks and bridges as follows: The height of rails or bulwarks shall be at least 391 ⁄ 2 inches from the deck. At the peripheries of the freeboard and superstructure decks and at the peripheries of all decks accessible to passengers, rails shall be in at least three courses including the top. The opening below the lowest course shall not be more than 9 inches. The courses shall not be more than 15 inches apart. In the case of ships with rounded gunwales the guard rail supports shall be placed on the flat of the deck. On other decks and bridges the rails shall be in at least two courses, including the top, approximately evenly spaced.
( b ) Where the height of the rails interferes with the business of the vessel, as in the case of a sport fishing vessel, other arrangements may be specifically approved by the Commandant. However, in general, the effective rail or bulwark height above the deck on which the passengers stand shall be at least 30 inches.
( c ) On the passenger decks of ferryboats, excursion vessels, and vessels of a similar type, the space below the top of the rail shall be fitted with suitable wire mesh or the equivalent. Depending upon the type of construction, the lower rail courses may not be required.
( d ) Where it can be shown to the satisfaction of the Commandant that a vessel is engaged exclusively in voyages of a sheltered nature, the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section may be relaxed.
[CGFR 69-72, 34 FR 17483, Oct. 29, 1969]
§ 63.15-5 Strainers. ( a ) Strainers must be installed in the fuel supply line. Each strainer must be self-cleaning, fitted with a bypass, or be capable of being cleaned without interrupting the fuel oil supply.
( b ) The strainer must not allow a quantity of air to be trapped inside which would affect the rate of fuel flow to the burner or reduce the effective area of the straining element.
( c ) The strainer must meet the requirements for strainers found in UL 296 (incorporated by reference, see § 63.05-1) and the requirements for fluid conditioner fittings found in § 56.15-5 of this subchapter.
[CGD 88-057, 55 FR 24238, June 15, 1990, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65191, Oct. 31, 2008]
§ 67.203 Restrictions on filing and recording. ( a ) No instrument will be accepted for filing unless the vessel to which it pertains is the subject of: ( 1 ) A valid Certificate of Documentation; or
( 2 ) An application for initial documentation, exchange of Certificate of Documentation, return to documentation, or for deletion from documentation, which is in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations, submitted to the National Vessel Documentation Center.
( b ) An instrument identified as eligible for filing and recording under § 67.200 may not be filed and recorded if it bears a material alteration.
( c ) An instrument identified as eligible for filing and recording under § 67.200 (a) or (b) may not be filed and recorded if any vendee or transferee under the instrument is not a citizen of the United States as defined in section 2 of the Shipping Act, 1916, (46 U.S.C. app. 802) unless the Maritime Administration has consented to the grant to a non-citizen made under the instrument.
( d ) The restriction imposed by paragraph (c) of this section does not apply to a bill of sale or deed of gift conveying an interest in a vessel which was neither documented nor last documented pursuant to these regulations or any predecessor regulations thereto at the time the instrument was executed, nor to an instrument conveying an interest in a vessel identified in § 67.11(b).
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31605, June 15, 1995; USCG-2016-0531, 82 FR 43864, Sept. 20, 2017]
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the
undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to
such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.









Dated: May 8,
      2009
            /s/ Jeffery
  StricklandJeffery
      StricklandChief
      Financial Officer













The foregoing certification is made
solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not for any other
purpose.
EXHIBIT 99.4
  % of
    
    
    
    
    
    
    % ofTotal
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total(Cdn$)
    
    2009
    
    
    Fees
    
    
    2008
    
    
    FeesAudit Fees:Cameco
    
    $
    1,756,900
    
    
    
    49.2
    %
    
    $
    1,388,760
    
    
    
    44.6
    %Centerra and other subsidiaries
    
    
    978,600
    
    
    
    27.4
    %
    
    
    1,197,276
    
    
    
    38.5
    %Total Audit Fees
    
    $
    2,735,500
    
    
    
    76.6
    %
    
    $
    2,586,036
    
    
    
    83.1
    %Audit-Related Fees:Cameco
    
    $
    219,800
    
    
    
    6.1
    %
    
    $
    98,200
    
    
    
    3.1
    %Centerra and other subsidiaries
    
    
    32,300
    
    
    
    0.9
    %
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Translation services
    
    
    424,000
    
    
    
    11.9
    %
    
    
    170,000
    
    
    
    5.5
    %Pensions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    15,000
    
    
    
    0.5
    %Total Audit-Related Fees
    
    $
    676,100
    
    
    
    18.9
    %
    
    $
    283,200
    
    
    
    9.1
    %Tax Fees:Compliance
    
    $
    40,000
    
    
    
    1.1
    %
    
    $
    121,500
    
    
    
    3.9
    %Planning and advice
    
    
    122,400
    
    
    
    3.4
    %
    
    
    122,300
    
    
    
    3.9
    %Total Tax Fees
    
    $
    162,400
    
    
    
    4.5
    %
    
    $
    243,800
    
    
    
    7.8
    %All Other Fees:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Fees:
    
    $
    3,574,000
    
    
    
    100.0
    %
    
    $
    3,113,036
    
    
    
    100.0
    %
 Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
#### § 69.51 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for measuring a vessel in order to comply with the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 (Convention), and 46 U.S.C. chapter 143.
§ 67.218 Optional filing of instruments in portable document format as attachments to electronic mail. ( a ) Any instrument identified as eligible for filing and recording under § 67.200 may be submitted in portable document format (.pdf) as an attachment to electronic mail (e-mail) for filing at the National Vessel Documentation Center. The e-mail address to be used for instrument filing may be obtained from the National Vessel Documentation Center Web site. If the instrument submitted for filing in .pdf format pertains to a vessel that is not a currently documented vessel, a completed Application for Initial Issue, Exchange, or Replacement Certificate of Documentation, or Return to Documentation (form CG-1258) or a letter application for deletion from documentation must already be on file with the National Vessel Documentation Center or must be submitted in .pdf format with the instrument being submitted in .pdf format for filing.
( b ) All instruments submitted for filing in .pdf format must be clearly legible, be submitted from 81 ⁄ 2 inch by 11 inch paper in not less than 10-point type size, and submitted as an attachment to e-mail.
( c ) The e-mail required by paragraph (b) should indicate: ( 1 ) The name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address of the person submitting the instrument for filing in .pdf format;
( 2 ) The number of pages submitted for filing in .pdf format; and
( 3 ) The name of the vessel, official number or hull identification number of the vessel(s), and the name(s) of the owner(s) of the vessel(s) to which the instrument relates.
( d ) The filing of any instrument submitted for filing in .pdf format is terminated and the instrument will be returned to the submitter if the instrument is subject to termination for any cause under § 67.217(a).
[USCG-2007-28098, 72 FR 42312, Aug. 2, 2007]
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Aviall, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2004 |  | /s/ Paul E. Fulchino                           
|                     |  |                                                
|                     |  | Paul E. Fulchino                               
|                     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|Date: April 27, 2004 |  | /s/ Colin M. Cohen                             
|                     |  |                                                
|                     |  | Colin M. Cohen                                 
|                     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing certification is being
furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending November 28, 2009

|Filer                 | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|DIAMOND BANCORP, INC. | * 4c8* 3A1  | Diamond Bancorp, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of DG Bancorp, Inc., Downers Grove, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire Downers Grove Natonal Bank, Downers Grove, Illinois, and, upon becoming a bank holding company, to continue to control 100 percent of the voting shares of Diamond Bank FSB, Schaumburg, Illinois, and thereby operate a savings association. | Newspaper:12/13/2009Federal Register:12/18/2009
|Newspaper:            | 12/13/2009 
|Federal Register:     | 12/18/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WINFRED MILNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 258 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00574-CR

Patricia Anne Phillips, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 57834, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02

(West Supp. 2005). The court adjudged her guilty and imposed a twelve-year prison sentence.

There was no plea bargain, and the court certified appellant’s right of appeal.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of her right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Patterson and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: February 24, 2006

Do Not Publish
98-2144.

#### State v. Weitbrecht.

Holmes App. No. 97CA588. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed September 15,1998:

“This matter is before this court upon appellant’s motion to certify a conflict. Certification is urged for the reason the judgment entered in this case on July 31,1998 is in conflict with judgments entered by the Eleventh District Court of Appeals in *State v. Stanford*([Sept. 23], 1996), Trumbull App. No. 95-T-5358, unreported [1996 WL 537856], and by the Twelfth District Court of Appeals in *State v. Garland (December*16, 1996), Fayette App. No. CA96-05-011, unreported [1996 WL 723715],

“Upon review, we find certification to the Supreme Court of Ohio is warranted. We hereby certify the following question:

“Does Ohio’s involuntary manslaughter statute [R.C. 2903.04(B) ] as applied to a minor misdemean- or traffic offense which results in a vehicular homicide violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 9, Article [I] of the Ohio Constitution.”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Transition Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-10411 and File
No. 333-10413) of our report, dated November 17, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Transition Systems, Inc. as of
September 30, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                           /s/ Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.

                                           Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 1997
#### § 403.100 Applicability of system of accounts and reports.

Each Association shall keep its books of account, records and memoranda, and make reports to the Director in accordance with the guidelines of the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. These guidelines are available by writing to the Director, Great Lakes Pilotage at the address listed in § 401.110(a)(9) of this chapter.

[60 FR 18369, Apr. 11, 1995. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998]
**Exhibit
      23.2**










**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**













We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-22859, 333-10783, 333-10587 and 333-35769 of Dynex Capital, Inc. on Form
      S-3
      and Registration Statement No. 333-32663 of Dynex Capital, Inc. on Form S-8
      of
      our report dated April 7, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of
      Dynex Capital, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2004.








**DELOITTE
      & TOUCHE LLP**





Princeton,
      New Jersey


March
      31,
      2006
§ 535.702 Agreements subject to Monitoring Report and alternative periodic reporting requirements. ( a ) Agreements subject to the Monitoring Report requirements of this subpart are: ( 1 ) An agreement that contains the authority to discuss or agree on capacity rationalization; or
( 2 ) Where the parties to an agreement hold a combined market share, based on cargo volume, of 35 percent or more in the entire U.S. inbound or outbound geographic scope of the agreement and the agreement contains any of the following authorities: ( i ) The discussion of, or agreement upon, whether on a binding basis under a common tariff or a non-binding basis, any kind of rate or charge;
( ii ) The establishment of a joint service;
( iii ) The pooling or division of cargo traffic, earnings, or revenues and/or losses; or
( iv ) The discussion of, or agreement on, any service contract matter.
( b ) The determination of an agreement's reporting obligation under § 535.702(a)(2) in the first instance shall be based on the market share data reported on the agreement's Information Form pursuant to § 535.503. Thereafter, at the beginning of each calendar year, the Bureau of Trade Analysis will notify the agreement parties of any changes in its reporting requirements based on market share data reported on the agreement's quarterly Monitoring Report for the previous second quarter (April-June).
( c ) The Commission may require, as necessary, that the parties to an agreement with market share below the 35 percent threshold, as identified and defined in § 535.702(a)(2), submit Monitoring Reports pursuant to § 535.703.
( d ) In addition to or instead of the Monitoring Report in § 535.703, the Commission may prescribe, as necessary, alternative periodic reporting requirements for parties to any agreement identified in § 535.201.
#### § 385.7 Issuance.

The MarAd assistance regulations are issued in the Code of Federal Regulations as Part 385, Chapter II, of Title 46, Shipping, after publication in the Federal Register. Copies of the MarAd assistance regulations in the Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
<PAGE>   1
                         SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints JOSEPH HINES and BRADLEY C. ANDERSON as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, for filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
together with any and all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to such attorney-in-fact and agent,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming that such attorney-in-fact and agent, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

     DATED:  October 29, 1999

                                             /s/ Kevin J. Tourek
                                             --------------------------
                                             KEVIN J. TOUREK

STATE OF ARIZONA    )
                    )
County of Maricopa  )

     On the 29th day of October, 1999, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally appeared KEVIN J. TOUREK, known to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same
for the purposes therein contained.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

                                             /s/ Janice L. Backus
                                             --------------------------
                                             Notary Public


My commission expires:
[seal of Janice L. Backus]

                                       EXHIBIT
                                        24-H