alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Timothy  G.  Byrd,  Sr.,  certify  that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated Medical
Management,  Inc.;
2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:
a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;
b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):
a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record, process,
summarize  and  report  financial  data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and
b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the  date  of  our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

Date:  May  20,  2004

/s/  Timothy  G.  Byrd,  Sr.
----------------------------
Timothy  G.  Byrd,  Sr.
Chief  Executive  Officer


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANAGEMENT LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826918
<NAME>  MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>  U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       384,844
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                       0
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             384,844
<CASH>                                      90,997
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         453,556
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      22,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,977,610
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            538,575
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        166,763
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       37,925
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            129,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       396
<OTHER-SE>                                 247,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,977,610
<PREMIUMS>                                  62,530
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         19,759
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          (1,083)
<OTHER-INCOME>                              88,268
<BENEFITS>                                  37,125
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 26,412
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        61,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             44,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,003
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         36,438
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                36,333
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.85
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6847

WILLIAM F. JOHNSON; BRIAN S. MARTIN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-151-AM)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William F. Johnson, Brian S. Martin, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice their motion for a temporary restraining order. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Johnson v. Angelone, No. CA-96-151-AM (E.D. Va.

May 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 64.49 Labeling openings.

Each opening of a tank must be labeled to identify the function such as “suction”, “discharge”, “heating coil”.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 8, 2006

|Filer                                   | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION | * 3A5       | Franklin Financial Services Corporation, Chambersburg, PA, to acquire Fulton Bancshares Corporation, McConnellsburg, PA. | Newspaper:05/08/2006Federal Register:05/08/2006
|Newspaper:                              | 05/08/2006 
|Federal Register:                       | 05/08/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35057-35058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis

[[Page 35058]]

Panel, July 18, 2007, 8 a.m. to July 18, 2007, 6 p.m., Hilton Crystal 
City, 2399 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202 which was 
published in the Federal Register on June 15, 2007, FR 07-2972.
    The meeting location was changed from Hilton Crystal City to State 
Plaza Hotel, Washington, DC. The rest of the information remains the 
same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3118 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-110306 and333-126606 of QLT Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-2488, 333-12422, 333-100070and 333-120657 of QLT Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 27, 2008**,**relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule (which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standard No. 123(R) — “Share-Based Payment”) of QLT Inc. and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of QLT Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2007.**/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP***Independent Registered Chartered Accountants*Vancouver, Canada
Opinion filed May 2 1, 2009



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

____________ 

### No. 1 1- 07 -0 03 00 -CR

____ ____ __ AN THON Y C OLE F ONT AN A, Ap pellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the Cr im inal Dis tric t Court N o. 1

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1044837D

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The trial c ourt convicte d Anthony Cole Fontana , upon h i s plea of guilty , of ag g ravated ro bb e ry wi th a kn if e a nd fo un d th a t a

de a dly we a po n w a s u se d o r e xhibi te d. A p le a ba rg a in a g re e me nt w a s r e a c he d, and the tr ia l c ourt

or ig ina lly

a sse sse d h is p un ishme nt a t c on fi ne me nt fo r s ix y ear s in acc ordanc e with the plea ag ree ment. Howeve r, the trial c ourt g rante d appellant’ s motion for ne w trial as to punishment only . After a new punishment hearing , the trial court assessed punis hme nt at c on fi ne me nt f or fi ve y e ars . We a ff

ir m.2

I n h is s ole iss ue on

a pp e a l, a pp e lla nt c on te nd s th a t th e tr ia l c ourt a bu se d it s d isc retion in a sse ssi ng his punis hme nt. Ap pe lla nt argue s that the tr ia l c ourt on ly “ g a ve pa ssi ng noti ce t o [ hi s] signific ant bra in injury

problems.” Appe llant asserts that he w as, there fore , denied a fair trial and should have be en plac ed on def err ed adjudication and asks that thi s court re mand for ne w p u n i s h m e n t
. A p p e l l an td o e s n o tc h a l l e n g e h i s c o n v i c t i o no r h i s p l e a o f g u i l t y. T EX . P EN A L C ODE ANN . § 29.03 (Ve rnon 2003) de fines the of fense of ag g ravated robb ery and dec lare s it to be a first deg ree felony . T EX . P EN A L C ODE ANN . § 12.32 (Ve rnon 2003) pr ovides that a per son convicted of a first de g ree felony

offe nse shall be c onfined for life or for a term of not more than nine ty -nine y ear s but not less than five y ear s. An optional $10,000 fine is also authorized. The trial c ourt assesse d appellant’ s punishment at the minimum auth o ri z ed under the a pp lic a ble law a nd le ss t ha n the te rm s to wh ic h he ha d or ig ina lly a g re e d. A pe na lty a sse sse d w ith in the ra ng e of punishment esta

blished by

the leg islature will not be disturbed on appe al. Jack son v. St ate , 6 80 S.W. 2d

80 9 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 84 ); Brad fie ld v . S tat e , 4 2 S
. W
. 3 d

3 5 0 , 3 5 4 ( T e x. App.—Eastland 2001, pe t. ref’ d). The re cord be fore this court does not support appe llant’s contentions that he wa s d en i ed a fair tr ial. The issue is over ruled. The judg ment of the trial c ourt is affir med.
PER C URI AM May 21, 2009 Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S t r an g e , J.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2527 

To provide authority for certain debt refinancing with respect to financings 

approved under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Ms. MARKEY of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To provide authority for certain debt refinancing with respect 

to financings approved under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DEBT REFI4 NANCING. 

5 During the 2 year period beginning on the date of 

6 the enactment of this Act, any financing approved under 

7 title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 

8 U.S.C. 695 et seq.) may include debt refinancing relating 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2527 IH

1 to a conventional loan that is not guaranteed by the Small 

2 Business Administration, if— 

3 (1) the proceeds of the indebtedness were used 

4 to acquire land, including a building situated there5 on, to construct a building thereon, or to purchase 

6 equipment; 

7 (2) the existing indebtedness is collateralized by 

8 fixed assets; 

9 (3) the existing indebtedness was incurred for 

10 the benefit of the small business concern; 

11 (4) the financing under title V of the Small 

12 Business Investment Act of 1958 will be used only 

13 for refinancing existing indebtedness or costs relat14 ing to the project financed under such title; 

15 (5) the financing under such title will provide a 

16 substantial benefit to the borrower when prepayment 

17 penalties, financing fees, and other financing costs 

18 are accounted for; and 

19 (6) the financing under section 504 of such title 

20 will provide better terms or rate of interest than the 

21 existing indebtedness at the time of refinancing. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Brown, Executive V.P. and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William C. BrownWilliam C. BrownExecutive V.P., Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryMay 6, 2004
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


 95 Methodist Hill Drive Suite 500


Rochester New York 14623


585.239.9800 | 585.239.9806


 


October 7, 2013


 


Dear Northeast LCD Capital, LLC:


 


As you know, Northeast LCD Capital, LLC holds two Notes from
Caliber I.D.  in the original principal amounts of $7 million and $5 million.  To permit Caliber to raise its next financing
round, Northeast agrees to modify the Notes as follows:


 


		1.	Contingent only on Caliber raising $6 million in the contemplated offering, the outstanding principal and interest of the $5
million Note will be converted in the offering into Caliber’s common stock on the same terms as the shares that are sold
to other investors in the offering.



 


		2.	The maturity of the $7 million Note will be extended by 3 years, the interest rate will remain the same but interest will be
payable only on maturity, and the only events of default will be nonpayment at maturity or Caliber’s insolvency.



 


		3.	Upon the conversion of the $5 million Note, Caliber will issue to Northeast fully-vested warrants to purchase 150,000 shares
of common stock at an exercise price equal to the higher of $1.00 per share or the price at which shares are sold in the
offering.



 


This letter is intended to be binding.  To that end, the parties
agree to promptly modify the Notes accordingly.


 


Sincerely,


 


Caliber I.D.


 


	/s/	 







 


Agreed:


 


Northeast LCD Capital, LLC


 


	/s/
§ 565.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Controlled carrier* means an ocean common carrier that is, or whose operating assets are, directly or indirectly owned or controlled by a government. Ownership or control by a government shall be deemed to exist with respect to any ocean common carrier if: ( 1 ) A majority portion of the interest in the carrier is owned or controlled in any manner by that government, by any agency thereof, or by any public or private person controlled by that government; or
( 2 ) That government has the right to appoint or disapprove the appointment of a majority of the directors, the chief operating officer or the chief executive officer of the carrier.
( b ) *Effective date* has the same meaning it has in 46 CFR part 520.
Argued and submitted June 28,

reversed and remanded with instructions November 8, 1995,

petition for review denied April 2, 1996 (323 Or 114)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*MICHAEL DUANE MILLSPAUGH, *Respondent.*

(C9008-34492; CA A80971)

904 P2d 655

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate indictment. *State v. Conger,*319 Or 484, 878 P2d 1089 (1994).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 162

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent double-counting of 
 income in the conduct of needs analysis for student assistance under 
                               that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent double-counting of 
 income in the conduct of needs analysis for student assistance under 
                               that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREVENTION OF DOUBLE-COUNTING OF INCOME IN ASSET 
              COMPUTATIONS.

    (a) Pell Grant Program.--Section 411F(2) of the Higher Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a-6(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following: ``No property (or interest therein) shall be 
treated as an asset of an individual or family if that individual or 
family has obtained that property or interest with funds that are 
treated, for purposes of this subpart, as part of that individual's or 
family's effective family income.''.
    (b) Other Student Assistance Programs.--Section 480(g) of such Act 
(20 U.S.C. 1087vv(g)) is amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following: ``No property (or interest therein) shall be treated as part 
of the net worth of an individual or family if that individual or 
family has obtained that property or interest with funds that are 
treated, for purposes of this part, as part of that individual's or 
family's available income.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall be effective for academic 
years beginning after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```