alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending April 14, 2012

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location          | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|PEOPLES B&TC CO, TROY, MISSOURI | 909055 | 12/05/2011 | 03/29/2012     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## NO. 12

- 0 9

- 00 2 96

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BENJAMIN VASQUEZ

, ' APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, APPELLEE ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Prior to commencement of oral argument, counsel for Appellant and counsel for the State

filed two agreed motions. One motion requested the withdrawal of Appellant’s notice of appeal,

and the other requested that the trial court’s judgment be reversed with out regard to the merits and

the case remanded to the trial court. At oral argument, the court announced that Appellant’s

motion to withdraw his notice of appeal was granted and that the remaining motion was moot.

Because Appellant’s motion to withdra w his notice of appeal has been granted, the appeal

is dismissed . All pending motions are overruled as moot.

Opinion delivered February 18 , 2011.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1550 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1550

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel CAROLYN.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 1995

 Mr. Hilleary introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel CAROLYN.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel CAROLYN (Tennessee 
State registration number TN1765C).
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles M. Krich, *Respondent, v.*The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.

■ — Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs, upon opinion in preceding case, as stipulated.
#### William I. Chase and another, *Appellants, v.*Nelson Chase and others, *Appellants.*Henry Newman, *Purchaser, Respon*dent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 8, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location              | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CENTENNIAL BK, CONWAY, ARKANSAS     | 456045 | 05/09/2011 | 09/23/2011     | S         | Large Bank 
|KING SOUTHERN BK, CHAPLIN, KENTUCKY | 909541 | 04/18/2011 | 09/27/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|WARREN B&TC, WARREN, ARKANSAS       | 748441 | 06/06/2011 | 09/09/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

____________________________

No. 99-14875

____________________________

D.C. Docket No. 99-00142-CV-4

DANIEL A. WELZEL,

 Debtor.

---------------------------------------------------

ADVOCATE REALTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

KENNETH L. ROYAL,

 Plaintiff,

versus

DANIEL A. WELZEL, 

 Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________

No. 99-14876

______________________________

D. C. Docket No. 99-00145-CV-4

DANIEL A. WELZEL,

 Debtor.

------------------------------------------------

ADVOCATE REALTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

KENNETH L. ROYAL,

 Plaintiff,
versus

DANIEL A. WELZEL, 

 Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Georgia

-------------------------------------

(Opinion June 29, 2001, 245 F.3d 1283, 11th Cir., 2001)

(August 7, 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK,

CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON Circuit Judges.*

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in

favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. 

The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

 

*Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this

matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending February 9, 2008

|Filer               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|UCBH HOLDINGS, INC. | * 3A3         | UCBH Holdings, Inc., San Francisco, California, to acquire up to 6.52 percent of First American International Corporation, and thereby indirectly its subsidiary, First American International Bank, both of Brooklyn, New York. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/22/2008
|Newspaper:          | Not available
|Federal Register:   | 02/22/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 1, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Dickinson, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Dickinson*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 13.]

(No. 97-2317

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*R. Larry Schneider,*Union County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Rick Rodger,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1032
BIN LIN, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (No. A70-505-315) Submitted: May 25, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bin Lin, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Bin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. SeeINS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. SeeIn re: Lin , No. A70-505-315 (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 1.98 The Research and Innovative Technology Administration. Is responsible for: ( a ) Coordinating, facilitating, and reviewing the Department's research and development programs and activities, except as related to NHTSA;
( b ) After consultation with Operating Administration and OST offices, making recommendations to the Secretary on all Operating Administration and OST research budgets;
( c ) Providing leadership on technical, navigation, communication, and systems engineering activities, and spectrum management on behalf of the civil and civilian PNT communities;
( d ) Directing and administering university transportation research grants;
( e ) In coordination with FHWA, NHTSA, and FMCSA, conducting vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure research;
( f ) Advancing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) research and deployment of real-time multi-modal travel information for travelers, carriers, and public agencies;
( g ) Providing oversight of the activities of the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, the ITS Joint Program Office, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, and the Transportation Safety Institute; and
( h ) Providing technical support to advance the mission of the Secretary's Safety Council.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


 <ARTICLE> 5
 <LEGEND>
 This Schedule contains summary financial
 information extracted from the financial
 statements contained in the body of the
 accompanying Form 10-K and is qualified in its
 entirety by reference to such financial
 statements.
 </LEGEND>
 <MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
        
 <S>                           <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
 <PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
 <CASH>                        11,441
 <SECURITIES>                  53,617
 <RECEIVABLES>                 0
 <ALLOWANCES>                  0
 <INVENTORY>                   107,637
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
 <PP&E>                        0
 <DEPRECIATION>                0
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                227,213
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
 <BONDS>                       96,671
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         53,617
 <PREFERRED>                   0
 <COMMON>                      49
 <OTHER-SE>                    74,164
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  227,213
 <SALES>                       70,940
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>              112,899
 <CGS>                         51,430
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                 51,430
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>              26,176
 <LOSS-PROVISION>              2,029
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>            13,872
 <INCOME-PRETAX>               19,392
 <INCOME-TAX>                  (16,013)
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>           35,405
 <DISCONTINUED>                0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>               0
 <CHANGES>                     0
 <NET-INCOME>                  27,696
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                 5.63
 <EPS-DILUTED>                 5.63
         


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1410 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1410

 To amend the Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994 to prohibit 
                 the contracting out of certain duties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1995

  Ms. Norton (for herself and Mrs. Morella) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and 
                               Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994 to prohibit 
                 the contracting out of certain duties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF SERVICE CONTRACTS.

    Section 5(g) of the Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994 
(Public Law 103-226; 108 Stat. 117) is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``The President'' and inserting in lieu 
        thereof ``(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        President''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) The duties and responsibilities of an individual who 
separates from Government service in order to receive a voluntary 
separation incentive payment under section 3 may not be performed, in 
whole or in part, by any person under contract with the United 
States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending May 1, 2010

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|Soteria Financial Group, Inc. | * 3A1         | Soteria Financial Group, Inc., Henderson, Kentucky, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The Bank of Henderson, Inc., Henderson, Kentucky. | Newspaper:05/22/2010Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | 05/22/2010   
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1

FIRST FARMERS ANDMERCHANTS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Farmers and MerchantsCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date       November 9,  2006                             /s/ T.  Randy Stevens                                                                                                                                                                             |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 T. Randy Stevens, Chief Executive Officer |

| Date       November 9,  2006                                         /s/  Patricia P. Moody                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Patricia P. Moody,  Assistant Treasurer (principal financial                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|             officer and principal accounting officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
#### § 1103.31 Responsibility for litigation.

The practitioner bears the responsibility for advising as to questionable transactions, bringing questionable proceedings, or urging questionable defenses. Client's instructions cannot be used as an excuse for questionable practices.