alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 21, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2010 (January 1, 2010 - March 31, 2010)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 29, 1995 (52), Para 52.8 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 513-514]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.52.8  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment in the nature of a substitute 
submitted by Mr. PETERSON of Florida:

[[Page 514]]

       Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the 
     following:

                              ``Article --

       ``Section 1. No person who has been elected to the Senate 
     two times shall be eligible for election or appointment to 
     the Senate. No person who has been elected to the House of 
     Representative six times shall be eligible for election to 
     the House of Representatives.
       ``Section 2. Election as a Senator or Representative before 
     this Article is ratified shall be taken into account for 
     purposes of section 1. Any State limitation on service for 
     Members of Congress from that State, whether enacted before, 
     on, or after the date of the ratification of this Article 
     shall be valid, if such limitation does not exceed the 
     limitation set forth in section 1.''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

135

negative

Nays

297
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 16th meeting of the American Health Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

June 5, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​chroniccare/​*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Workgroup will discuss barriers to availability of care in the virtual setting. The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​chroniccare/​cc_​instruct.html*

Dated: April 30, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-2275 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
us. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

May 6, 2016 

Evan Mortenson 

Certification Manager, Air Tractor Inc. 

P.O. Box 485 

Olney, Texas 76374 

Dear Mr. Mortenson, 

800 Independence Ave .. S W 

Washington. DC. 20591 

This is in response to your April29, 2016 letter requesting an extension of the comment 

period for this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled, Revision of Airworthiness 

Standards for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes (Docket FAA20 15-1621 ). The NPRM comment period closes on May 13, 2016. We believe sufficient time 

exists for interested persons to submit comments, and as of May 4, 2016, have received over 

17 comments. Therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration does not find it in the best 

interest of the public to extend the comment period. Your request for an extension of the 

comment period is denied. However, as stated in 14 Code of Federal Regulations§ 11.45, we 

will consider comments filed late if at all possible to do so without incurring expense or 

delay. 

We have placed this response with your request in the rulemaking docket. 

Sincerely, 

w 

Director, Office ofRulemaking
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 129 (Friday, July 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 37032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Exploratory and Developmental 
Alcohol Research Center Review FRA 07-001.
    Date: July 24-25, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIAAAA, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3037, Rockville, MD 
20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Inst. on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3037, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-3037, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c8a3a9bcbaa1a6a988a5a9a1a4e6a6a1a0e6afa7be"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e9e3f6f0ebece3c2efe3ebeeacecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-3298 Filed 7-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147, 333-53667,333-85791, 333-36478, 333-40038, 333-43838, 333-67868, 333-85884, and 333-109314 of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form S-8, the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to registration statements Nos. 333-31342 and333-96341 and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to registration statement No. 333-59106 of the Company on Form S-3 and registration statement No. 333-49180 of the Company on Form S-3 of our report dated March 12, 2004 (which expresses anunqualified opinion), appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K/A of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 17, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 2, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending March 21, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 6, 2011

|Filer                                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|COMMERCIAL AND SAVINGS BANK OF MILLERSBURG, OHIO, THE | * 18C          | The Commercial & Savings Bank, Millersburg, Ohio to purchase assets and assume liablities of two branches of Premier Bank & Trust, N.A., Wooster, Ohio.                               | Newspaper:08/15/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                            | 08/15/2011    
|Federal Register:                                     | Not applicable
|PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., THE               | * 3A3          | Application by PNC Financial Services Group, Pittsburgh PA and PNC Bancorp, Wilmington, DE to acquire RBC Bank USA, Raleigh, NC pursuant to section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act | Newspaper:09/02/2011Federal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                                            | 09/02/2011    
|Federal Register:                                     | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location          | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|HOCKING VALLEY BK, ATHENS, OHIO | 230610 | 04/11/2011 | 07/12/2011     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit  32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to

18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:

     3)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     4)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 11, 2005                  By /s/ John Benson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Benson, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1242.51 Dismantling retired property and depreciation (accounts XX-27-39 and 62-27-00).

Separate common expenses in proportion to the separation of common repair and maintenance expenses associated with the particular common property depreciated and/or dismantled.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARTIN BOOKER, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-12345 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER BURNETT, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_____________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT (ECF #32) AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FACILITATE 

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (the 

“Motion”) (ECF #32), which was filed and served on June 17, 2016. The Court held 

a hearing on the Motion on October 11, 2016. For the reasons stated on the record 

at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion (ECF #32) is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that parties shall facilitate within 60 days. Pending 

the outcome of facilitation, all dates in the Scheduling Order (ECF #24) are held in 

abeyance. If the case does not settle, the Court will issue an updated schedule. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: October 11, 2016 

2:15-cv-12345-MFL-MKM Doc # 38 Filed 10/11/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 582
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on October 11, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-12345-MFL-MKM Doc # 38 Filed 10/11/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 583
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners XI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: August 13, 2008  
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: August 13, 2008  



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### The Poughkeepsie National Bank, Respondent, *v.*Frank Hasbrouck, *as*Trustee,. etc., *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
#### ADAM WILLHART, PLAINTIFF, v. MORTIMER FORT, DEFENDANT.

Decided February 21, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Katzenbach.

For the rule, *George L. Record.*

Contra, *John ~W. Palmer.*

Per Curiam.

This is an automobile accident case. The plaintiff was traveling south through Washington street, Newark, on his way -to Elizabeth, at about ten o’clock in the evening of June loth, 1926. It was a rainy night. He testified that when he reached Clinton avenue he observed approaching from his left another car, going west on that avenue, and which was then about five hundred feet away from the intersection; that when he got about half-way across Clinton avenue he was run into by that car, which was owned by the defendant and was being driven by him. The defense was that the accident was the result of the negligence of the plaintiff and not of the defendant.

The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the jury awarding him $4,500. The defendant thereupon applied for and received a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, upon the ground that it was against the weight of the evidence upon the question of negligence, and that it was excessive.

*192The only question argued before us is the alleged excessiveness of the verdict. The plaintiff was the proprietor of an automobile garage. His testimony was that for a period of three weeks after the accident he was unable to do any work at all; that after the expiration of this period he was and still is unable to do any of the heavy work which his business requires; that, for this reason, he was compelled to lose a good many customers, causing a large falling off of his business and of the earnings resulting therefrom. Dr. Brothers, who was a member of the medical staff of St. Barnabas Hospital, in the city of Newark, testifies that, from his personal examination of the plaintiff, including an inspection of X-ray plates, he found that the plaintiff had a dislocation fracture at the outer end of the right collar-bone, which destroyed to some extent the muscular power which would naturally be in his right hand; in other words, that it partly destroyed his grip; that there was an injury to the left elbow, which caused a slipping of the tendons underneath; that there was some injury to the left tibia, and that there was also soreness of the left ribs and muscles and of parts of the abdomen directly thereunder. He further testified that these injuries, in his opinion, were permanent. The jury evidently accepted the doctor’s testimony as an accurate description of thé injuries received by the plaintiff as the result of this collision. This they had a right to do, and, having done so, we cannot say that the verdict, which was awarded as compensation for those injuries and which approximately amounted to $4,000 (the excess being compensation for damage done to the plaintiff’s car and his doctor’s bill), is excessive.'

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL DORMAN, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-12552 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST 

TO EXCLUDE PUNITIVE DAMAGES 

Defendant Clinton Township has requested that the Court bar Plaintiffs from 

seeking an award of punitive damages at trial under either 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or the 

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The parties thereafter filed 

several supplemental briefs on this issue. (See Supp. Brs., ECF Nos. 163, 165, 167, 

170, 171, 173, 174.) On July 11, 2022, the Court held an on-the-record status 

conference to discuss the punitive damages issue. For the reasons explained on the 

record during that conference, the Township’s request is GRANTED. Absent 

further order of the Court, Plaintiffs shall not mention punitive damages at trial, and 

they shall not be permitted to seek an award of punitive damages from the jury. 

It is further ordered that for the reasons explained on the record during the 

status conference, the July 12, 2022, trial in this matter is ADJOURNED. 

Case 2:15-cv-12552-MFL-DRG ECF No. 175, PageID.6130 Filed 07/11/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

Finally, Plaintiffs may file a motion asking the Court to certify its punitive 

damages ruling for an interlocutory appeal by no later than August 8, 2022. The 

Township may file a response by no later than September 6, 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: July 11, 2022 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on July 11, 2022, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:15-cv-12552-MFL-DRG ECF No. 175, PageID.6131 Filed 07/11/22 Page 2 of 2
.'i ,,.

{Hffl ,,i

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 9-3, PageID.114 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 1