alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOHN VAN ROY, Respondent, *v.*CLARA MORRIS HARRIOTT, Appellant.

*Examination of a party before trial*— *the residence or office address of the applicant's attorney must be stated in the moving affidavits*— *Code of Civil Procedure, sec.*877.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term denying a motion to vacate an order requiring the defendant to appear and be exam- - ined as a witness at the instance of the plaintiff before trial.

The court at General Term said: “ By the affidavit upon which the order was made it appeared that an issue of fact had been joined in the action by the service of the defendant’s answer. But neither of the affidavits contained a statement of the residence or office address of the plaintiff’s attorney. The statement npon this subject was £ that defendant has appeared herein and that I, Albert Englehardt, of 291 Broadway, New York city, is her attorney.’ This was not a compliance with what has been positively required by subdivision 1, section 872 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to entitle a party to the examination of an adverse party as a witness before trial. The legislature have prescribed precisely what shall be done, and no difficulty whatever can stand in the way of complying with these requirements. Where that is not done no right to examine the adverse party in this manner will be made out. *(Bimham,*v. *Mercantile Mutual Ins. Go.,*6 Abb. N. C., 70.)

“ In *Beach*v. *Mayor, etc.*(14 Hun, 79), the affidavit npon which a like order was made was similarly defective, and it was held by the court to be insufficient to entitle the party to the examination. This authority is decisive against the order in this case. It was irregularly made, and it should be reversed with the usual costs and disbursements.”

*A. J.*Bittenhoeffer, for the appellant.

*O'Byrne & Stewctrt,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.;

Davis, P. J., concurred.

Present — Davis, P. J., and Daniels, ¿T.

Order reversed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



Certification of Principal Accounting Officer



I, Wm. Lee Popham, Principal Accounting Officer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Admiral Financial Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: September 14, 2011



/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham, Principal Accounting Officer
§ 95.613 Procurement standards. ( a ) *General.* Procurements of ADP equipment and services are subject to the procurement standards prescribed by part 75 regardless of any conditions for prior approval. The Department retains the authority to provide greater oversight including requiring a State to comply with § 75.328 if the Department determines that the State procurement process is an impediment to competition that could substantially impact project cost or risk of failure.
( b ) Those standards, as well as the requirement for prior approval, apply to ADP services and equipment acquired by a State or local agency, and the ADP services and equipment acquired by a State or local Central Data Processing facility primarily to support the Social Security Act programs covered by this subpart. Service agreements are exempt from these procurement standards.
[51 FR 45326, Dec. 18, 1986, as amended at 75 FR 66339, Oct. 28, 2010; 81 FR 3020, Jan. 20, 2016]
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 11, 2005                                 /s/ Jeffery Strickland
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Jeffery Strickland
                                                         Chief Financial Officer




     The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and not for any other purpose.



                                       19
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.21 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 419]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.21  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. ARCHER: Committee on Ways and Means. H.R. 1215. A bill 
     to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to strengthen the 
     American family and create jobs (Rept. No. 104-84). Referred 
     to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
     Union.
       Mr. SOLOMON: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 119. 
     Resolution providing for further consideration of the bill 
     (H.R. 4) to restore the American family, reduce illegitimacy, 
     control welfare spending, and reduce welfare dependence 
     (Rept. No. 104-85). Referred to the House Calendar.
```
# Assistance for the West Bank and Gaza

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 550(b) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (FOAA)(Public Law 109-102), as amended by the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234), sections 620K(e) and 620L(b)(4) of the Foreign Assistance Act, as added by the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-446), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby certify and report that:

With respect to the provision of assistance for the administrative and personal security costs of the Office of the President of the Palestinian Authority; for the activities of the President of the Palestinian Authority to promote democracy, peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the rule of law and to fulfill his duties as President, including, among other things, to maintain control of the management and security of border crossings and to foster the Middle East peace process; and, with respect to independent agencies:

it is in the national security interest of the United States to provide such assistance;

as the case may be, the President of the Palestinian Authority, the President's party, and independent agencies and any members thereof, including any individual or entity for which assistance is proposed to be provided, are not members of, appointed by, or effectively controlled by Hamas or any other foreign terrorist organization; and

such assistance provided hereunder will not be transferred or retransferred to any member of Hamas or other foreign terrorist organization or to any entity effectively controlled by Hamas or other foreign terrorist organization.

Accordingly, I hereby waive section 550(a) of the FOAA, as amended, and section 620K(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, with respect to such assistance, and authorize such assistance for the above purposes. 

Furthermore, I hereby determine that, with respect to assistance to nongovernmental organizations for the West Bank and Gaza other than assistance covered by paragraphs (b)(1), (2), and (3) of section 620L of the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, it is in the national security interest of the United States to provide such assistance as the Secretary of State deems appropriate, and assign to the Secretary of State the functions under section 620L(b)(4)(B) regarding the specific programs, projects, and activities to be carried out using such assistance.

I also hereby assign the functions of the President under section 550(b) and (c) of the FOAA, as amended and as carried forward under the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110-5), to the Secretary of State.

                        You are hereby authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and publish it in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 07-3137

Billing code 4710-10
§ 90.10-42 Tankerman. The following ratings are established in part 13 of this chapter. The terms for the ratings identify persons holding valid merchant mariners' documents for service in the ratings issued under that part: ( a ) Tankerman-PIC.
( b ) Tankerman-PIC (Barge).
( c ) Restricted Tankerman-PIC.
( d ) Restricted Tankerman-PIC (Barge)
( e ) Tankerman-Assistant.
( f ) Tankerman-Engineer.
[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17157, Apr. 4, 1995]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending April 25, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|SAEHAN BANCORP    | CIC           | Notice by Don Rhee, Bok Kyung Rhee, and the Rhee Family Trust, all of Los Angeles, California, to acquire additional voting shares of Saehan Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Saehan Bank, both of Los Angeles, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/08/2009
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | 05/08/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                 | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMUNITY FIRST BK, PRINEVILLE, OREGON | 843270 | 12/01/2008 | 04/01/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 5, 2009

|Filer                                             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|MASON NATIONAL BANK EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN | * 3A3       | Mason National Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Mason, Texas, to acquire additional shares up to 34.7 percent of Mason National Bancshares, Inc., Mason, Texas, and indirectly acquire The Mason National Bank, Mason, Texas. | Newspaper:09/26/2009Federal Register:09/30/2009
|Newspaper:                                        | 09/26/2009 
|Federal Register:                                 | 09/30/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|TEXAS COASTAL BK, PASADENA, TEXAS | 783965 | 04/20/2009 | 08/31/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 502.95 Proceedings involving assessment agreements. ( a ) In complaint proceedings involving assessment agreements filed under section 5(e) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40301(e), 40305), the Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment will specify a date before which the initial decision will be issued, which date will not be more than eight months from the date the complaint was filed.
( b ) Any party to a proceeding conducted under this section who desires to utilize the prehearing discovery procedures provided by subpart L of this part must commence doing so at the time it files its initial pleading, i.e., complaint, answer, or petition for leave to intervene. Discovery matters accompanying complaints must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for service pursuant to § 502.113. Answers or objections to discovery requests must be subject to the normal provisions set forth in subpart L.
( c ) Exceptions to the decision of the presiding officer, filed pursuant to § 502.227, must be filed and served no later than 15 days after date of service of the initial decision. Replies thereto must be filed and served no later than 15 days after date of service of exceptions. In the absence of exceptions, the decision of the presiding officer must be final within 30 days from the date of service, unless within that period, a determination to review is made in accordance with the procedures outlined in § 502.227. [Rule 77.]
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016]
#### § 90.10-25 Ocean.

Under this designation shall be included all vessels navigating the waters of any ocean or the Gulf of Mexico more than 20 nautical miles offshore.
Release dates |     Full version (23 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending October 9, 2010

----

Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend without revision the Report of Net Debit Cap (FR 2226) and to extend with revision the Statement of Purpose for an Extension of Credit by a Creditor (FR T-4), Statement of Purpose for an Extension of Credit Secured by Margin Stock (FR U-1), Statement of Purpose for an Extension of Credit Secured by Margin Stock by a Person Subject to Registration Under Regulation U (FR G-3), Registration Statement for Persons Who Extend Credit Secured by Margin Stock (Other Than Banks, Brokers, or Dealers) (FR G-1), Deregistration Statement for Persons Registered Pursuant to Regulation U (FR G-2), and Annual Report (FR G-4).            -Proposed, October 6, 2010            Enforcement            Financial Bancshares Company, Becker, Minnesota -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.            -Announced, October 5, 2010                        HomeStar Financial Group, Inc., Manteno, Illinois -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.            -Announced, October 5, 2010                        HSBC North America Holdings, Inc., New York, New York -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order.            -Announced, October 7, 2010                        Neighborhood Bank Corporation, Palatka, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, October 5, 2010                        NexTier Incorporated, Butler, Pennsylvania -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.            -Announced, October 7, 2010                        Valley Financial Corporation, Roanoke, Virginia, and Valley Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.            -Announced, October 7, 2010            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1652

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that individuals

who have attained age 591⁄2 may contribute to individual retirement

accounts without regard to their compensation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 1995

Mr. SHAYS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that individuals who have attained age 591⁄2 may contribute to individual retirement accounts without regard to

their compensation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IRA CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS ATTAINING AGE 591 4 ⁄2 DETERMINED WITHOUT

5 REGARD TO COMPENSATION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 219(b) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to maximum amount of
2

•HR 1652 IH

1 deduction) is amended by adding at the end the following

2 new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO

HAVE ATTAINED AGE 591 4 ⁄2.—In the case of an individual who attains age 591 5 ⁄2 before the close of such

6 individual’s taxable year, paragraphs (1)(B) and

7 (3)(B) shall be applied for such year and each tax8 able year thereafter, by substituting ‘the income’ for

9 ‘the compensation’ or ‘the compensation (as defined

10 in section 415(c)(3))’, respectively.’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

13 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6664

JEFFREY S. ADKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; EDWARD W. MURRAY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-93-215-R)

Submitted: August 10, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey S. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Quentin Harris,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey S. Adkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal

of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant permission

to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability,

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Adkins v. Attorney Gen., No. CA-93-215-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED