alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commercial Jewelry Company *v.*Basilio Dente.

January Term, 1910.

Present: Rowell, C. J., Munson, Watson, Haselton, and Powers, JJ.

Opinion filed April 4, 1910.

*Practice in Supreme Court*— Record—Piling—Special *Orders of Court*— Nature *and Effect.*

An order made by the Supreme Court that tbe excepting party, who is not ready when his case is reached, shall file the printed case and his brief within a specified time, and in default thereof that judgment shall be affirmed, is within the power of the Court, is in the nature of a special rule of Court made pursuant to statute, and therefore, amounts to a law, and should be enforced as such.

General Assumpsit to recover payment of two drafts accepted by defendant. Trial by court at the March Term, 1909, Washington County, *Sail,*J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant excepted.

*R. A. Soar*for the defendant.

*E. R. Da/ois*for the plaintiff.

Per Curiam :

This case was'brought here by the defendant. When it was reached, he was not ready, and at his request, it was left with the Court, under an order granting leave to the ex-ceptant to file the printed case and his brief within a time specified, and providing that judgment should be affirmed in case he failed to comply with the order. He did not comply.

There is reason to believe that the real force and effect of such an order as was made in this case are not fully appreciated by the members of the bar. We take this opportunity, therefore, to make the matter plain. Orders of this bind are of the nature of special rules of Court, which when made pursuant to statute have all the force of law. *Taft*v. *Taft,*82 Vt. 64, 71 Atl. 831. They are made to expedite proceedings, and should *351be respected by the bar and enforced by the court. Otherwise practice becomes confused and unsatisfactory. That the order in question was within the power of the court is well established. *Pillger*v. *Strassman,*119 Cal. 691, 52 Pac. 40; *Sutton*v. *Jones,*9 Colo. App. 36, 47 Pac. 400; *Myers*v. *Jeffersonville,*144 Ind. 567, 40 N. E. 796; *Brashears*v. *Ventus,*(Ky.) 43 S. W. 405; *Plymouth Clo. Ho.*v. *Seymour,*74 Minn. 425, 77 N. W. 239.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 25, 2010

|Filer                                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|WARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P. | CIC           | Warburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P., New York, NY, to acquire up to 19.7% of National Penn Bancshares, Inc, Boyertown, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/08/2010
|Newspaper:                            | Not available
|Federal Register:                     | 12/08/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1012.3 Public notice. ( a ) Unless a majority of the Board determines that such information is exempt from disclosure under the Act, public notice of the scheduling of a meeting will be given by filing a copy of the notice with the Clearance Clerk of the Board for posting and for service on all parties of record in any proceeding which is the subject of the meeting or any other person who has requested notice with respect to meetings of the Board, and by submitting a copy of the notice for publication in the Federal Register.
( b ) Public notice of a scheduled meeting will contain: ( 1 ) The date, time, place, and subject matter of the meeting.
( 2 ) Whether it is open to the public.
( 3 ) If the meeting or any portion of the meeting is not open to the public, an explanation of the action taken in closing the meeting or portion of the meeting, together with a list of those expected to attend the meeting and their affiliations.
( 4 ) If a vote is taken on the question of whether to close a meeting or a portion of a meeting to the public, a statement of the vote or position of each Board Member eligible to participate in that vote. If such a vote is taken, public notice of its result will be posted within one working day following completion of the voting. If the result of the vote is to close the meeting or a portion of the meeting, an explanation of that action will be included in the notice to be issued within one working day following completion of the voting. The public notice otherwise required by this subparagraph may be withheld if the Board finds that such information is exempt from disclosure under the Act.
( 5 ) The name and telephone number of the Board official designated to respond to requests for information about the meeting.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) of this section, public notice will be given at least one week before the date upon which a meeting is scheduled.
( d ) If a majority of the Board Members eligible to participate in the conduct or disposition of the matter which is the subject of a meeting determines, by recorded vote, that Board business requires that a meeting be called on less than one week's notice, the meeting may be called on short notice, and public notice will be posted and published at the earliest practicable time.
( e ) Changes in the scheduling of a meeting which has been the subject of a public notice will also be made the subject of a public notice, which will be posted at the earliest practicable time. Changes in, or additions to a conference agenda or in the open or closed status of a meeting will be made only if a majority of the Board Members eligible to participate in the conduct or disposition of the matter which is the subject of the meeting determines, by recorded vote, that the Board's business requires such change and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible. In such a case, the public notice of the change, will show the vote of each Board Member on the change.
[42 FR 13796, Mar. 11, 1977, as amended at 64 FR 53267, Oct. 1, 1999; 74 FR 52905, Oct. 15, 2009; 81 FR 8851, Feb. 23, 2016; 84 FR 12943, Apr. 3, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

#### § 107.111 Withdrawal.

An application may be withdrawn at any time before a decision to grant or deny it is made. Withdrawal of an application does not authorize the removal of any related records from the PHMSA dockets or files. Applications that are eligible for confidential treatment under § 105.30 will remain confidential after the application is withdrawn. The duration of this confidential treatment for trade secrets and commercial or financial information is indefinite, unless the party requesting the confidential treatment of the materials notifies the Associate Administrator that the confidential treatment is no longer required.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 4, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type             | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANCORP       | * 18C* 4c8* Branch* 3A3 | Fifth Third Bancorp, Cincinnati, Ohio, to acquire 100 percent of R-G Crown Bank, FSB, Casselberry, Florida, pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act                                                                                                                                                                          | Newspaper:09/02/2007Federal Register:08/06/2007      
|Newspaper:                | 09/02/2007             
|Federal Register:         | 08/06/2007             
|HOMETOWN BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5                   | Hometown Bancshares, Inc. Middlebourne, West Virginia to acquire First Community Bancorp, Inc., St. Marys, West Virginia, pursuant to section 3(a)(5) of the BHCA.  First National Bank of St. Marys, St. Marys, West Virginia will be merged with and into Union Bank, Inc., Hometown's subsidiary bank located in Middlebourne, West Virginia. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                | Not available          
|Federal Register:         | Not available          

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.17 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 4]
[Page 419]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.17  providing for the consideration of h.r. 4

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-85) the resolution (H. Res. 119) providing for the further 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 4) to restore the American family, 
reduce illegitimacy, control welfare spending, and reduce welfare 
dependence.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
98-2265.

#### State v. Wilberger.

Cuyahoga App. No. 74775. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
§ 67.259 Requirements for amendments to notice of claim of lien. An amendment to notice of claim of lien presented for filing and recording must: ( a ) Be signed by or on behalf of each original claimant or last assignee of record; and
( b ) Recite the nature of the change being effected by the instrument.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58281, Sept. 29, 2014; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 61262, Oct. 10, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 105
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 105 appear at 70 FR 56087, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 105.55 Refusal to obey a subpoena. ( a ) *Quashing or modifying a subpoena.* If you receive a subpoena, you can ask PHMSA to overturn (“quash”) or modify the subpoena within 10 days after the subpoena is served on you. Your request must briefly explain the reasons you are asking for the subpoena to be quashed or modified. PHMSA may then do the following: ( 1 ) Deny your request.
( 2 ) Quash or modify the subpoena.
( 3 ) Grant your request on the condition that you satisfy certain specified requirements.
( b ) *Failure to obey.* If you disobey a subpoena, PHMSA may ask the Attorney General to seek help from the United States District Court for the appropriate District to compel you, after notice, to appear before PHMSA and give testimony, produce subpoenaed documents or physical evidence, or both.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending June 4, 2011

|Filer                                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|KEYSTONE INVESTMENT, INC.                 | CIC           | Notification by Teresa L. Keslar, Beatrice, Nebraska, to acquire control of Keystone Investment, Inc., parent of Bank of Keystone, both in Keystone, Nebraska.                                                                                      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/21/2011
|Newspaper:                                | Not available
|Federal Register:                         | 06/21/2011   
|STATE BANK EMPLOYEES STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN | CIC           | Notification by Stanley D. Ostmeyer, Quinter, Kansas, to become trustee of the State Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Hoxie, Kansas, and thereby acquire control of Prairie State Bancshares, Inc., parent of State Bank, both in Hoxie, Kansas. | Newspaper:06/08/2011Federal Register:05/24/2011   
|Newspaper:                                | 06/08/2011   
|Federal Register:                         | 05/24/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 1013.2 The irrevocability of the trust. ( a ) The trust and the nomination of the trustee during the term of the trust should be irrevocable.
( b ) The trust should remain in effect until certain events, specified in the trust, occur. For example, the trust might remain in effect until ( 1 ) all the deposited stock is sold to a person not affiliated with the settlor or
( 2 ) the trustee receives a Board decision authorizing the settlor to acquire control of the carrier or authorizing the release of the securities for any reason.
( c ) The settlor should not be able to control the events terminating the trust except by filing with this Board an application to control the carrier whose stock is held in trust.
( d ) The trust agreement should contain provisions to ensure that no violations of 49 U.S.C. 11323 will result from termination of the trust.
[44 FR 59909, Oct. 17, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 8851, Feb. 23, 2016]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending January 10, 2009

----

Advisory CouncilsConsumer Advisory Council  -- appointment of ten new members and designation of Edna Sawady as chair and Michael D. Calhoun as vice chair for 2009.					-Announced, January 7, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyMoney Market Investor Funding Facility (MMIFF)  -- revisions to expand the set of eligible investors to include certain U.S.-based securities lenders, government investment pools, and other investment funds and to adjust several economic parameters of the MMIFF. 					-Announced, January 7, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesCommunity Reinvestment Act  -- final interagency guidance in the form of questions and answers regarding the Community Reinvestment Act, and publication for comment of new and revised questions and answers.  					-Approved, December 17, 2008 					(AC)

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: January 15, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 114 (Thursday, June 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 32835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) and Kootenai National 
Forest's Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on 
Thursday, June 28, 2007 at 6 p.m. at the Forest Supervisor's Office in 
Libby, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the 
public.

DATES: June 28, 2007

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor's Office, 1101 US Hwy 2 West, Libby, 
Montana

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Edgmon, Committee Coordinator, 
Kootenai National Forest at (406) 283-7764, or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#284a4d4c4f454746684e5b064e4d4c065d5b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83e1e6e7e4eeecedc3e5f0ade5e6e7adf6f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics include: funding for fiscal 
year 2008, review of approved project proposals, election of chair and 
co-chair, and receiving public comment. If the meeting date or location 
is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including 
the Daily Interlake based in Kalispell, Montana.

    Dated: June 8, 2007.
Paul Bradford,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-2936 Filed 6-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00441-CV

IN RE Jaime LUEVANO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 24, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 There is no underlying proceeding in this case. However, relator seeks relief against the 81st Judicial District 

Court, Wilson County, Texas, the Honorable Donna Rayes presiding, and the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson 

County, the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Western Balkans

On June 26, 2001, by Executive Order 13219, I declared a national emergency with respect to the Western Balkans pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions of persons engaged in, or assisting, sponsoring, or supporting (i) extremist violence in the Republic of Macedonia and elsewhere in the Western Balkans region, or (ii) acts obstructing implementation of the Dayton Accords in Bosnia or United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of June 10, 1999, in Kosovo. I subsequently amended that order in Executive Order 13304 of May 28, 2003. 

Because the actions of persons threatening the peace and international stabilization efforts in the Western Balkans continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on June 26, 2001, and the measures adopted on that date and thereafter to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond June 26, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the Western Balkans. 

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 07-3143

Billing code 3195-01-P