alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J-A15039-20

J-A15040-20

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee

 v.

MATTHEW EARLY,

 Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 2159 EDA 2019

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered October 25, 2018

in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0000769-2013

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee

 v.

MATTHEW EARLY,

 Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 2160 EDA 2019

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered October 25, 2018

in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0000771-2013

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., KING, J. and STRASSBURGER, J.*

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J. Filed: August 13, 2020

I join the Majority’s memorandum, excepting the Majority’s holding

that Appellant has not made a plausible claim of innocence. See Majority 

Memorandum at 11-13.
J-A15039-20

J-A15040-20

- 2 -

There is a plausible claim of innocence because 1) the affidavits of 

probable cause stated that the victims had identified Appellant’s brother as 

the shooter in the photo arrays, and 2) Appellant claims the surveillance 

video depicts the shorter of the two individuals, the brother, was the shooter 

and Appellant is taller.

However, I concur because withdrawal of Appellant’s pleas would work 

substantial prejudice to the Commonwealth based on Commonwealth’s loss 

of contact with one victim and three other witnesses.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending June 19, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT 31.2**Certification:I, John Benson, Certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DGSE Companies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the Company and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterlyreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and  c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation asof the Evaluation Date; 5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely            affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company’s auditorsany material weakness in internal controls; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls; and 6. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actionwith regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.         Date: August 14, 2007     /s/ John Benson  - Chief Financial Officer
§ 56.30-35 Gasketed mechanical couplings. ( a ) This section applied to pipe fittings that form a seal by compressing a resilient gasket onto the pipe joint primarily by threaded fasteners and where joint creep is only restricted by such means as machined grooves, centering pins, or welded clips. Fittings to which this section applies must be designed, constructed, tested, and marked in accordance with ASTM F1476 and ASTM F1548 (both incorporated by reference, see § 56.01-2). Previously approved fittings may be retained to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) Gasketed mechanical couplings may be used within the service limitations of pressure, temperature and vibration recommended by the manufacturer, except that gasketed mechanical couplings must not be used in— ( 1 ) Any location where leakage, undetected flooding, or impingement of liquid on vital equipment may occur; or
( 2 ) In tanks where the liquid conveyed in the piping system is not chemically compatible with the liquid in the tank.
( c ) Gasketed mechanical couplings must not be used as expansion joints. Positive restraints must be included, where necessary, to prevent the coupling from creeping on the pipe and uncovering the joint. Bite-type devices are generally not accepted for this purpose. Machined grooves, centering pins, and welded clips are considered positive means of protection against creep.
[CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26001, May 23, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67180, Dec. 1, 1999]
Order entered November 20, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01002
- CV
VALPAK DIRECT MARKET ING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant
V. COLONIAL SAVINGS, F. A., Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 03570
- 2018



### O RDER
B efore the Court is appellant’s November 19, 2018 unoppose d motion to supplement its brief. Appellant explains in its motion that, at a stat us hearing on October 15, 2018, the trial court made a ruling that moots the arguments made in sections IV, V, VI, and VII of its original brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent that we ORDER appellant to file an amended brief by November 30, 2018

. Als o before the Court is appellee’s November 16, 2018 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. In light of the fact that appellant will file an amended brief, we GRANT the motion and extend the time to December 20, 2018

. /s/ ADA B ROWN JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Del Norte County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on June 26, 2007 in Crescent City, California. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the project submission and selection process for Title II proposals submitted under Public Law 106-393, H.R. 2389, the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, also called the “Payments to States” Act.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on July 2, 2006, from 6 to 8:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Del Norte County Unified School District Board Room, 301 West Washington, Crescent City, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Ranieri, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501. Phone: (707) 441-3673. e-mail:                         *jranier@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Individuals, community-based organization, tribes and government agencies will present the Title II project proposals submitted to the RAC. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the committee at that time.

Dated: June 18, 2007.

William D. Metz,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-3062  Filed 6-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

|Date: July 20, 2007 |  | /s/ J. BRYAN BAKERJ. Bryan Baker Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, March 13, 1995 (43), Para 43.2 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 374]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.43.2  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. JONES, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Friday, March 10, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

SUSAN L. KLEIN

v. Record No. 0739-95-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM JAMES L. KLEIN NOVEMBER 14, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY William R. Shelton, Judge (Dana L. Gay; Duty, Duty & Gay, on brief), for appellant. No brief for appellee.

Susan L. Klein (wife) appeals the decision of the circuit court awarding her a divorce from James L. Klein (husband) on no-fault grounds. Wife contends that the trial court erred in not granting the divorce on the grounds of husband's adultery and/or desertion. Upon reviewing the record and opening brief, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. The trial court received evidence through depositions. A divorce decree based upon depositions is "'presumed correct and will not be overturned if supported by substantial, competent and

credible evidence.'" Collier v. Collier , 2 Va. App. 125, 127, 341 S.E.2d 827, 828 (1986) (citation omitted). Based upon that evidence, the court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 grant a divorce on the grounds of adultery. Husband and wife both admitted that the parties had marital problems and had discussed getting a divorce prior to the final separation. Husband testified that he and wife had agreed to separate in June 1993. While wife alleged that husband had an adulterous relationship prior to the final separation, husband denied any pre-separation adultery. Moreover, even where dual grounds for divorce exist, the trial judge "can use his sound discretion to select the appropriate grounds upon which he will grant the divorce."

Zinkhan v. Zinkhan , 2 Va. App. 200, 210, 342 S.E.2d 658, 663 (1986). The trial judge is not "compelled 'to give precedence to one proven ground of divorce over another.'" Williams v.

Williams , 14 Va. App. 217, 220, 415 S.E.2d 252, 253 (1992) (citation omitted). The evidence established that the parties lived separate and apart for more than one year. Therefore, the trial court's decision was supported by substantial, credible and competent evidence. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in granting a divorce on no-fault grounds rather than on the basis of husband's alleged adultery or desertion. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily

affirmed.

Affirmed.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending March 7, 2009

|Filer                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                                  
|--------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|OHIO VALLEY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | Premises       | Ohio Valley Financial Group, Inc., Henderson, Kentucky, to increase its investment in bank premises in the amount of $115,963. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable
|TOWN & COUNTRY BANK               | Member         | Town & Country Bank, Salem, Missouri, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                        | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

THE SECURITY REPRESENTED HEREBY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED UNDER ANY APPLICABLE STATE
SECURITIES LAW AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE ASSIGNED EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH ACT AND THE REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR
PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM SUCH REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION. 
 VINCE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING, LLC. 

PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	 $[        ]
	  	 [            ], 2013

(the “Date of Issuance”)


 For value received, Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
“Maker”), hereby promises to pay immediately to the order of Kellwood, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Payee”), the principal amount of $[        ].
Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Transfer Agreement (as defined below). 

This promissory note (this “Note”) is issued in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by that
certain Transfer Agreement (the “Transfer Agreement”), dated as of [            ], 2013, by and between Maker and Payee, pursuant to which the Maker will acquire the Equity
Interests from Payee as of the Closing. Immediately upon the cash payment in full of all amounts due to Payee under this Note, this Note shall be surrendered to the Maker and marked “cancelled”. 

In the event the Maker fails to pay any amounts due hereunder (in accordance with Section 6.01(a) of the Transfer Agreement) immediately
on the date of issuance, the Maker shall pay to the holder hereof, in addition to the amounts due hereunder, all costs of collection or enforcement of this Note, including reasonable attorneys fees. 

The Maker, and its successors and assigns, hereby waive diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and
nonpayment of this Note, and expressly agree that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be extended from time to time and that the holder hereof may accept security for this Note or release security for this Note, all without in any way affecting
the liability of the Maker hereunder. 
 This Note shall be governed by the internal laws, not the laws of conflicts, of the State of
Delaware. 

*        *        *       
 * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has executed and delivered this Note on the Date of Issuance. 

 

			
	VINCE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING, LLC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:
	Its:


 Signature Page to Promissory Note of Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC.
§ 76.23-20 Piping. ( a ) All piping, valves, and fittings shall meet the applicable requirements of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) All piping, valves, and fittings of ferrous materials shall be protected inside and outside against corrosion unless specifically approved by the Commandant.
( c ) All piping, valves, fittings, and sprinkler heads shall be securely supported, and where necessary, protected against injury.
( d ) Drains and dirt traps shall be fitted where necessary to prevent the accumulation of dirt or moisture.
( e ) Piping shall be used for no other purpose.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 21, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were                           ( print page 3417)                        filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Keithley Instruments, Inc., Solon, OH; and PLX Technology, Sunnyvale, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Mapsuka Industries Co., Ltd., Taipei, TAIWAN has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on march 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 5, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67642).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-319  Filed 1-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Security Warehousing Company, Appellant, *v.*The American Exchange National Bank, Respondent.

*Security Warehousing Co.*v. *American Exchange Nat. Bank,*132 App. Div. 925, affirmed.

(Argued October 10, 1910;

decided October 25, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division, of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered-May 14, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action for conversion.

*Samuel II. Ordway*for appellant.

*Benjamin N. Cardozo*and *Edgar J. Nathan*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-ray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.