alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 125 (Friday, June 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[No. USN-2007-0005]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by July 30, 
2007.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Candidate Application Procedures for 
the United States Naval Academy; USNA GRB 1110/11, 1110/12, 1110/14, 
1110/15. 1110/91, 1110/92 and 1531/34; OMB Number 0703-0036.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Number of Respondents: 14,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 14,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 4 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 56,000.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is necessary to 
determine the eligibility and evaluate overall competitive standing of 
candidates for appointment to the United States Naval Academy. An 
analysis of the information collected is made by the Admissions Board 
during the process in order to gauge the qualifications of individual 
candidates.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; Federal Government.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: June 22, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-3193 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 12, 2007

|Filer                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|NORTHUMBERLAND BANCORP | CIC           | J. Donald Steele, Jr., and Joanne K. Steele, Lewisburg, PA to purchase up to 35% of Northumberland Bancorp, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/21/2007
|Newspaper:             | Not available
|Federal Register:      | 05/21/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 99.2



                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to his
knowledge:

         1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and
         2)       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2002                 By   /s/ John Benson                  .
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Benson, Chief Financial Officer
                                            and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

# ACTION:

Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 253. This bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin Number 253 is being published in the                         **Federal Register**                         to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         June 1, 2007.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This document gives notice of revisions in per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 252. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the                     **Federal Register**                     now constitute the only notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:                

Dated: May 24, 2007.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

      ( print page 30560)          ( print page 30561)          ( print page 30562)          ( print page 30563)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M 

[FR Doc. 07-2704 Filed 5-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### § 78.57-1 All personnel must comply.

All licensed masters, officers, and certificated seamen on United States vessels shall strictly comply with routing instructions issued by competent naval authority.

[CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26005, May 23, 1996]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Kimala Perry,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Case No. 15-11748

Jo Ann Stores, Inc., Sean F. Cox

United States District Court Judge

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER OVERRULING 

OBJECTIONS TO RULE 68 OFFER OF JUDGMENT

This civil case was originally assigned to the Honorable Robert H. Cleland, but was

recently reassigned to the undersigned for trial. (See Docket Entry No. 53).

In an Order issued on August 9, 2016, Judge Cleland ordered that the trial and jury

selection in this action would commence on October 18, 2016. (Docket Entry No. 24).

On October 4, 2016, Defense Counsel filed and served a “Rule 68 Offer of Judgment,”

stating that Defendant offers “to allow judgment to be entered against it in the amount of FiftyThousand ($50,000), including costs and attorneys’ fees.” (Docket Entry No. 42).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]t least 14 days

before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an

offer to allow judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 68(a)

(emphasis added).

Here, the date set for trial was October 18, 2016. (Docket Entry No. 24). Pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, when the period of time is stated in days, as is the case with Rule 68, you

count days, not hours. Defendant served the Offer of Judgment on October 4, 2016 – which was

1

2:15-cv-11748-SFC-SDD Doc # 62 Filed 10/17/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 756
14 days prior to the scheduled trial date. The fact that Plaintiff’s Counsel may have not reviewed

the Offer of Judgment until the morning of October 5, 2016, does not render it untimely.

The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s Rule 68 Offer of

Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: October 17, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

October 17, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-11748-SFC-SDD Doc # 62 Filed 10/17/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 757
§ 78.47-37 Watertight doors. ( a ) All watertight doors in subdivision bulkheads shall be numbered conspicuously on both sides on an etched plate or equivalent in not less than 3 ⁄ 8 inch letters and figures “W. T. D. 1,” “2,” “3,” etc. If a stenciled or similar notice is used, the letters and figures shall be at least 1 inch high. If the construction is such that the number cannot be seen with the door in the open position, a similar number shall be placed on the frame or other location immediately adjacent to the door. All watertight door remote control stations shall be marked in the same manner, and in addition, the direction of operation of the lever or wheel to open and close the door shall be conspicuously marked.
( b ) Class 1 doors fitted in accordance with the requirements in § 170.255 of this chapter must additionally be marked “RECLOSE AFTER USE.”
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16955, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51008, Nov. 4, 1983; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58282, Sept. 29, 2014]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 21, 2009

|Filer                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|Patriot Financial Partners | CIC           | Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners, GP, LLC, Patriot Financial Managers, L.P., and Messrs. Ira M. Lubert, W. Kirk Wycoff and James J. Lynch, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to purchase up to 14.9 percent of Guaranty Bancorp, parent of Guaranty Bank and Trust Company, both in Denver, Colorado, through the acquisition of voting shares. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/03/2009
|Newspaper:                 | Not available
|Federal Register:          | 04/03/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Environmental Studies Program**  **Proposed Study for FY 201 3**  Formatting Guidance: We recommend study profiles be less than 2 pages . Please do not try to make this a detailed scope of work. If the study is selected f or further consideration, BOEM will prepare a more detailed scope of work. Please provide the following categories of information. **Region:** Alaska [Standard for all.] **Planning Area(s):** [e.g., Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, North Aleutian Basin as applicable.

See Fig.1 of the Plan.] **Title:** [Fill in concise title. ] **BOEM Information Need(s) to be Addressed:**  Provide brief and conclusive reason(s) why BOEM needs the information. For example, identify how the study relates to analysis under the National Enviro nmental Policy Act and/or specific BOEM decision(s), such as formulation of a mitigation measure. Please be as specific as possible. **Period of Performance:** FY 201 3

- 20 XX **Description:** Background : Please provide 1 to 2 paragraphs on relevant issues. Exp lain what information is required and provide pertinent background. Include details about whether this study ties in with other efforts, and if so, how. Include a description of the current status of information. That is, what is the level of adequacy of existing information, does any exist, does it need to be more geographically specific? Objectives : Clearly and succinctly state the objective(s) of the study. Explain what hypothesis will be tested or what questions will be answered by this study. W e encourage the use of lists (1, 2, 3, etc.) for multiple, related objectives. Methods : Provide brief detail on what information, techniques or methods are available that could be used. Explain how the objectives of the study will be accomplished.
**D ate information is required:**  Provide dates when products would be most useful, such as “Final r eport is needed by December 2015 .” If the product of the study is something additional to the scientific report (e.g. database, model, bibliography), explain i n this section.
#### § 386.13 Soliciting, vending, and debt collection.

Soliciting aims, or commercial soliciting and vending of all kinds, displaying or distributing commercial advertising, or collecting private debts is prohibited on Academy property. This prohibition does not apply to national or local drives for funds for charitable purposes, welfare, health, or other purposes as authorized by the “Manual on Fund Raising Within the Federal Service,” issued by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under Executive Order 10927 of March 18, 1961, and sponsored or approved by the Superintendent; and to commercial lessees and contractors authorized to sell goods or services.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 77 DB 2022 (No. 34 RST 2022)

:

LAURA LOUISE COOK : Attorney Registration No. 316814

: 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2022, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 7, 2022, is approved and it is ORDERED that

LAURA LOUISE COOK, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that he has 

the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to 

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PAUL J. HOWELL,

Plaintiff(s),

vs Case No: 15-12542

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES

LLC,

Defendant(s),

_______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties advised the Court that they have amicably resolved their

differences. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed. This Court retains

jurisdiction for the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement

agreement.

S/Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: 9/23/2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

9/23/2015

S/ Carol A. Pinegar 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:15-cv-12542-VAR-EAS ECF No. 7 filed 09/23/15 PageID.26 Page 1 of 1
#### William H. Homan, *Appellant, v.*George P. Byrne, *Respondent.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
#### § 69.151 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes measurement requirements for the assignment of either one gross and one net register tonnage or two gross and two net register tonnages to vessels under this subpart.

[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18731, Mar. 31, 2016]
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Walden C. Rhines, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mentor Graphics Corporation, the registrant;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | /s/ Walden C. Rhines   
|                      |  | Walden C. Rhines       
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Madison Cooper, *Respondent, v.*Thomas R. Langdon, *Appellant.*

Motion foi; leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.