alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending May 15, 2010

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|CONNECTICUT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, THE | * Branch       | Application by Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, 58 State House Square, Hartford, Connecticut, to establish a de novo branch office at 114 Woodland Street, Hartford, Connecticut, pursuant to section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act and section 208.6 of Regulation H.          | Newspaper:05/07/2010Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:                            | 05/07/2010    
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable
|New England Bancorp, Inc.             | 3A1            | Notification by New England Bancorp, Inc., Hyannis, Massachusetts, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Bank of Cape Cod, Hyannis, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(5)(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended and section 225.17 of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAMIAN STEPLIGHT , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:01

- cr
- 00264

- LMB

- 4 )

Submitted : December 18 , 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Damian Steplight, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Damian Steplight appeals the district court ’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (20 12 ) motion . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Steplight , No. 1:01

- cr
- 00264

- LMB

- 4 (E.D. Va. July 3, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0498

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM212AD

747-53A2784 --- 8/27/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### Sawyer *v.*Wood.

Whether a writ was made by a deputy sheriff in violation of s. 21, c. 216 of the General Laws, presents a question of fact, *to*be determined at the trial term.

Motion, by Elizabeth P. Gill, who appears as a subsequent attaching creditor, to dismiss the action because the writ was made by a deputy sheriff. Facts found by a referee.

March 25, 1879, the plaintiff went to the office of N. Butler, an attorney, to get him to make a writ of attachment against the defendant. Not finding Mr. Butler, and after consulting with John C. Pearson, a deputy sheriff, the plaintiff requested one Choate and Pearson to find Charles Butler, a son of N. Butler, and see if he could not make the writ. Charles said he thought he could make the writ if he could get into his father’s office. At that time, and for about a year and a half previous, Charles was in the employ of his father, assisting him to some extent in his office, writing insurance policies and copying legal documents. During this time he had had some expedience in making ordinary writs in assumpsit under his father’s direction, but he had never studied law.

Having made an entrance into his father’s office, Charles sat *348down at a table to make the writ. Pearson made several suggestions to him in regard to filling out the blank; and it was doubtful whether he would have got the writ right in all particulars without the aid of Pearson’s suggestions. The plaintiff understood that he was employing N. Butler to make his writ, and that Charles was acting for and in the name of his father, and by his authority. Pearson and Charles also so understood it. As soon as N. Butler learned what had been done, he ratified it all, and entered the action in court.

From the foregoing facts the referee found, as a matter of fact, that the writ in question was made for the plaintiff by N. Butler, and not by Pearson, and denied said Gill’s motion to dismiss the action.

*Mug ridge*and *Leach*Stevens, for subsequent attaching creditor.

Butler, for the plaintiff.

Foster, J.

Section 21, *e.*216, G. L., provides that “ any writ * * * made by a deputy sheriff * * * for another person, shall be void.” The object of the statute was to guard against abuses that might follow from allowing the same person to exercise the powers of a sheriff and an attorney at the same time. *Osgood*v. Norris, 21 N. H. 435; *Smith*v. Saxton, 6 Pick. 483; *Clarke*v. Lyman, 10 Pick. 45.

But the question before the referee in this case was, whether the plaintiff’s writ was made by an attorney or by a deputy sheriff. There was evidence tending to show that Charles Butler, in writing the writ, acted as the agent or servant of his father. No exception was taken to any of the evidence; and the referee having decided the question of fact in favor of the plaintiff, there is no question of law in the case. *Cummings*v. *Center Harbor,*57 N. H. 17.

*Motion*denied.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### Mackenzie et al., Appellants, v. The Hallack Paint, Oil and Glass Company, Appellee.

Pbacticb.

Where the questions presented for review are only those of fact, and there is evidence to support the finding, the judgment will not be disturbed.

*Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.*

Mr. Ezra Keeler, for appellants.

Mr. J. Warner Mills, for appellee.

Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The action was brought by appellee to recover the balance due on an open account between the parties for goods sold to appellants by the appellee at various times from April to December, 1890. The plaintiff claimed something over $2,000 as due and unpaid, which was denied by the answer, admitting $876.35 to be due, and that amount only.

The questions to be determined were purely those of fact— an accounting and the finding the amount due. The case was tried to the court, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,860.17.

No question of law is presented by the errors assigned,— they are to the effect that the court erred in its finding of the facts, principally in failing to allow certain credits claimed by the defendants. The evidence was very conflicting and con*157tradictory — it appears to have been simply a question as to which set of witnesses was worthy of credit. The court gave credit to those of the plaintiff. It is urged in argument that the court misunderstood the facts, and that through such misunderstanding defendants failed to get credits admitted to have been received — to a large amount; that the credits were indorsed upon notes and that such notes and the book account were for the same indebtedness. We cannot determine from the evidence that such was the fact. It seems impossible that such a blunder could occur with the defendants represented by counsel, and had it occurred, the court, even after its finding — -had attention been called to it — would unquestionably have corrected the error. The attention of the court should have been called to it by a motion for a new trial, but none appears to have been made.

Where the evidence is contradictory and there was evidence to support the finding, and the questions presented for review are only those of fact, the judgment will not be disturbed. This rule has been so often stated and reiterated, both in the supreme court and in this, that no citation of decisions is necessary.

The judgment of the district court must be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
§ 95.15-40 Pressure relief. ( a ) Where necessary, relatively tight compartments such as refrigeration spaces, paint lockers, etc., shall be provided with suitable means for relieving excessive pressure accumulating within the compartment when the carbon dioxide is injected.
###### Editorial Note on Part 515

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 515 appear at 67 FR 39860, June 11, 2002, and 70 FR 7669, Feb. 15, 2005.

#### § 515.26 Termination of financial responsibility.

No license or registration shall remain in effect unless valid proof of a financial responsibility instrument is maintained on file with the Commission. Upon receipt of notice of termination of such financial responsibility, the Commission shall notify the concerned licensee, registrant, or registrant's legal agent in the United States, by email, mail, courier, or other method reasonably calculated to provide actual notice, at its last known email address or address, that the Commission shall, without hearing or other proceeding, revoke the license or terminate the registration as of the termination date of the financial responsibility instrument, unless the licensee or registrant shall have submitted valid replacement proof of financial responsibility before such termination date. Replacement financial responsibility must bear an effective date no later than the termination date of the expiring financial responsibility instrument.

[84 FR 62468, Nov. 15, 2019]
#### § 67.521 Application for new vessel determination.

An application fee is charged for a new vessel determination in accordance with subpart M of this part.
#### § 380.3 Processing of application.

All applications under section 805(a) shall be referred to the Chief, Office of Government Aid, Maritime Administration, for consideration and such further action as may be appropriate.
§ 71.05-15 Posting. ( a ) The permit shall be carried in a manner similar to that described in § 71.01-5 for a certificate of inspection.
( b ) [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending April 18, 2009

----

Bank Holding CompaniesThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., New York, New York, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA  -- modifications of the Board's regulatory reporting requirements for bank holding companies and state member banks.					-Partially granted, February 20, 2009 					(AC)

Banks, State MemberICE US Trust LLC, New York, New York  -- interim exemption to permit current participating members of ICE Trust to apply a 20 percent risk weight to claims on ICE Trust.					-Granted, April 14, 2009 					

EnforcementBeverly Hills Bancorp Inc., Calabasas, California; WFC Inc.; and Wilshire Acquisitions Corporation  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the State of California Department of Financial Institutions.					-Announced, April 16, 2009 					Community First Bank, Prineville, Oregon  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services.					-Announced, April 14, 2009 					Silverton Financial Services, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.					-Announced, April 13, 2009 					TFC Holding Company, Alhambra, California  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, April 15, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: April 23, 2009
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2522 

AN ACT 

To raise the ceiling on the Federal share of the cost of 

the Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling 

Project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2522 EH

1 That section 1631(d) of the Reclamation Wastewater and 

2 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h– 

3 13(d)) is amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph 

5 (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) In the case of the Calleguas Municipal Water 

8 District Recycling Project authorized by section 1616, the 

9 Federal share of the cost of the Project may not exceed 

10 the sum determined by adding— 

11 ‘‘(A) the amount that applies to the Project 

12 under paragraph (1); and 

13 ‘‘(B) $40,000,000.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2522 

AN ACT 

To raise the ceiling on the Federal share of the cost 

cling Project, and for other purposes. of the Calleguas Municipal Water District Recy-
§ 4.06-15 Accessibility of chemical testing devices. ( a ) *Alcohol testing.* ( 1 ) The marine employer must have a sufficient number of alcohol testing devices readily accessible on board the vessel to determine the presence of alcohol in the system of each individual who was directly involved in the SMI.
( 2 ) All alcohol testing devices used to meet the requirements of this part must be currently listed on either the Conforming Products List (CPL) titled “Modal Specifications for Devices To Measure Breath Alcohol” or “Conforming Products List of Screening Devices To Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids,” which are published periodically in the Federal Register by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
( 3 ) The alcohol testing devices need not be carried on board each vessel if obtaining the devices and conducting the required alcohol tests can be accomplished within 2 hours from the time of occurrence of the SMI.
( b ) *Drug testing.* ( 1 ) The marine employer must have a sufficient number of urine-specimen collection and shipping kits meeting the requirements of 49 CFR part 40 that are readily accessible for use following SMIs.
( 2 ) The specimen collection and shipping kits need not be carried on board each vessel if obtaining the kits and collecting the specimen can be completed within 32 hours from the time of the occurrence of the SMI.
[USCG-2001-8773, 70 FR 75961, Dec. 22, 2005]
###### Editorial Note on Part 110

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

#### § 110.120 Deviation from this part.

Recipients may request a deviation from the non-statutory provisions of this part. The Associate Administrator will respond to such requests in writing. If appropriate, the decision will be included in the grant agreement. Request for deviations from this part must be submitted electronically to the Grants Chief at *HMEP.Grants@dot.gov*.

[84 FR 4000, Feb. 14, 2019]
98-2190.

#### State v. Crawford.

Lake App. No. 97-L-245. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF EAT AT JOE'S, LTD. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS, EQUITY ABD CASHFLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                         (2)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 96.30-1 Application. ( a ) This subpart, except § 96.30-90, applies to each vessel that is contracted for on or after November 23, 1992, and is equipped with any refrigeration unit using— ( 1 ) Ammonia to refrigerate any space with a volume of more than 20 cubic feet; or
( 2 ) Fluorocarbons to refrigerate any space with a volume of more than 1000 cubic feet.
( b ) Each vessel that is contracted for before November 23, 1992, must satisfy § 96.30-90 if it is equipped with any refrigeration unit using— ( 1 ) Ammonia to refrigerate any space with a volume of more than 20 cubic feet; or
( 2 ) Fluorocarbons to refrigerate any space with a volume of more than 1000 cubic feet.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vyta Corp
      for
      the year ended June 30, 2007, I, Paul H. Metzinger, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer of Vyta Corp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
      knowledge, that:





(1)           such
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vyta Corp for the year ended June 30, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vyta Corp for
      the
      year ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Vyta Corp.





Date:  October 15,
      2007





/s/Paul
                H. MetzingerPaul
                H. Metzinger,Acting
                Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Vyta Corp and will be retained by Vyta Corp and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending February 12, 2011

----

Testimony and Statements            Economic Outlook and Monetary and Fiscal Policy -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on the Budget on the economic outlook, monetary policy, and issues related to the federal budget.            -Published, February 9, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Regulation Y -- publication for comment of proposed rules to establish criteria for determining whether a company is "predominantly engaged in financial activities" and to define the terms "significant nonbank financial company" and "significant bank holding company," in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Announced, February 8, 2011                        Regulation Y -- final rule to implement the conformance period during which banking entities and nonbank financial companies supervised by the Board must bring their activities and investments into compliance with the prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and relationships with hedge funds and private equity funds imposed by the so-called Volcker Rule in the Dodd-Frank Act.            -Announced, February 9, 2011            Enforcement            BankVest, Inc., Castle Rock, Colorado -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.            -Announced, February 8, 2011                        Community Banks of Colorado, Greenwood Village, Colorado -- issuance of a prompt corrective action directive with the consent of the bank.            -Announced, February 10, 2011                        Financial Services of St. Croix Falls, Inc., St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.            -Announced, February 10, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received: