alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 95.15-50 Lockout valves. ( a ) A lockout valve must be provided on any carbon dioxide extinguishing system protecting a space over 6,000 cubic feet in volume and installed or altered after July 9, 2013. “Altered” means modified or refurbished beyond the maintenance required by the manufacturer's design, installation, operation and maintenance manual.
( b ) The lockout valve must be a manually operated valve located in the discharge manifold prior to the stop valve or selector valves. When in the closed position, the lockout valve must provide complete isolation of the system from the protected space or spaces, making it impossible for carbon dioxide to discharge in the event of equipment failure during maintenance.
( c ) The lockout valve design or locking mechanism must make it obvious whether the valve is open or closed.
( d ) A valve is considered a lockout valve if it has a hasp or other means of attachment to which, or through which, a lock can be affixed, or it has a locking mechanism built into it.
( e ) The master or person-in-charge must ensure that the valve is locked open at all times, except while maintenance is being performed on the extinguishing system, when the valve must be locked in the closed position.
( f ) Lockout valves added to existing systems must be approved by the Commandant as part of the installed system.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33878, June 7, 2012]
Exhibit 23.1



      Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
      ---------------------------------------------------



We have issued our report dated September 6, 2002,
accompanying the consolidated financial statements included
in the annual report of Novo Networks, Inc. (the Company,
(formerly eVentures Group, Inc.) on Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2002.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the registration statements of
Novo Networks, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-43032).




/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 25, 2002
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending August 22, 2009

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Investment     | Bank of America, N.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, through its Edge Corporation, BankAmerica International Finance Corporation, San Francisco, California, and FIA Card Services, N.A., Wilmington, Deleware, to make an indirect investment in MBNA Europe Bank Limited, Chester, England. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BCBANK, PHILIPPI, WEST VIRGINIA       | 829032  | 04/13/2009 | 07/16/2009     | S         | Small Bank 
|PAGE VALLEY BK, LURAY, VIRGINIA       | 233527  | 03/30/2009 | 07/01/2009     | O         | Small Bank 
|UNITED BK, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA          | 365325  | 02/02/2009 | 08/03/2009     | S         | Large Bank 
|UNITED BK, PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA | 1010930 | 02/02/2009 | 08/03/2009     | S         | Large Bank 
|VALLEY BK, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA          | 2303086 | 04/20/2009 | 07/30/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2009 (October 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The State ex rel. Paster, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *Stale ex rel. Paster v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 362.]

(No. 97-2696

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided January 20, 1999.)

*363
      *Dean G. Reinhard Co., L.P.A.,*and *Charles Zamora,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cheryl J. Nester,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Habash, Reasoner & Frazier, Stephen J. Habash*and *Pamela S. Krivda,*for appellee The- Electric Connection.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 92.05-15 Segregation of spaces containing the emergency source of electric power. ( a ) The provisions of this section shall apply to all vessels contracted for on or after October 1, 1958.
( b ) When a compartment containing the emergency source of electric power, or vital components thereof, adjoins a space containing either the ship's service generators or machinery necessary for the operation of the ship's service generators, all common bulkheads and/or decks shall be protected by approved “structural insulation” or other approved material. This protection shall be such as to be capable of preventing an excessive temperature rise in the space containing the emergency source of electric power, or vital components thereof, for a period of at least one hour in the event of fire in the adjoining space. Bulkheads or decks meeting Class A-60 requirements, as defined by § 72.05-10 of Subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter, will be considered as meeting the requirements of this paragraph.
§ 92.20-10 Location of crew spaces. ( a ) Crew quarters must not be located farther forward in the vessel than a vertical plane located at 5 percent of the vessel's length abaft the forward side of the stem at the designed summer load water line. However, for vessels in other than ocean or coastwise service, this distance need not exceed 8.5 meters (28 feet). For the purposes of this paragraph, the vessel's length must be as defined in § 43.15-1 of subchapter E (Load Lines) of this chapter. Unless approved by the Commandant, no section of the deck head of the crew spaces may be below the deepest load line.
( b ) There must be no direct communication, except through solid, close fitted doors, or hatches between crew spaces and chain lockers, or machinery spaces.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1574 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1574

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude certain bank 
               products from the definition of a deposit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bank Insurance Fund and Depositor 
Protection Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DEPOSIT.

    Section 3(l)(5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S. C. 
1813(l)(5) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) any liability of an insured depository 
                institution that arises under an annuity contract, the 
                income of which is tax deferred under section 72 of the 
                Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to any liability of an 
insured depository that arises under an annuity contract issued on or 
after the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.570 Interim approval of prototype SIP company or vessel plans. ( a ) A company operating under an approved prototype SIP company or vessel plan must apply in writing by November 1, 1998, to the cognizant OCMI for approval to continue operating under the plans while revisions are developed to bring the prototype SIP company or vessel plan into conformance with this subpart. The OCMI may approve the request for a period of up to 3 years.
( b ) A company that does not request approval as required by paragraph (a) of this section or does not obtain approval to continue operating under a prototype SIP company or vessel plan by February 1, 1999, may no longer operate under the plans and will be inspected in accordance with the requirements of 46 CFR part 2, subpart 2.01 of this chapter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States of America,

Plaintiff/Respondent,

v. Criminal Case No. 15-20262 

Civil Case No. 19-10239

Charles Albert Walker, Sean F. Cox

United States District Court Judge

Defendant/Petitioner.

______________________________/

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in an Opinion and Order issued on this date, IT IS ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED that the Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED and

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: August 30, 2019

Case 2:15-cr-20262-SFC-EAS ECF No. 103, PageID.625 Filed 08/30/19 Page 1 of 1
§ 401.431 Disputed charges. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76352 , Sept. 17, 2024.
( a ) Any rate or charge applied against any vessel, owner, or master thereof by a registered pilot which the owner or master disputes as a charge prohibited by § 401.430, may be appealed to the Director for an advisory opinion as to whether such rate or charge is a prohibited charge.
( b ) The appeal shall be in writing and set forth the amounts and description of the rates and charges disputed. The appeal must be supported by evidence that a reasonable attempt has been made to resolve the matter between the parties and that a bona fide controversy exists.
( c ) The respondent shall be furnished a copy of the appeal and be notified by the appellant that the matter has been appealed for an advisory opinion.
( d ) The respondent shall be allowed a reasonable time, not less than twenty (20) days, in which to file with the Director and the appellant any data or arguments desired to be submitted in further defense of the disputed rates and charges.
( e ) The Administration shall consider all relevant matter presented and issue an advisory opinion which shall be accompanied by an express recital that all relevant material received has been considered. The advisory opinion shall set forth the rates and charges in dispute, a discussion of the facts and relevant material considered, and a statement of opinion.
( f ) When it is found that the disputed rates and charges, in the opinion of the Director, are charges prohibited by § 401.430, the respondent shall have a reasonable time, but not more than thirty (30) days in which to refund moneys, adjust invoices, and otherwise conform to the advisory opinion.
( g ) Failure or refusal to comply with the advisory opinion within the time allowed may form a basis for a determination that there is a violation of the Great Lakes Pilotage Regulations subject to the provisions of § 401.500.
[29 FR 10467, July 28, 1964, as amended at 32 FR 14221, Oct. 13, 1967; 61 FR 5721, Feb. 14, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-27-1996
<CASH>                                           6,341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                       318
<INVENTORY>                                     12,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,339
<PP&E>                                          13,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,402
<SALES>                                         26,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,865
<CGS>                                           12,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Case No. DA 23**  **- 0716**  RODNEY BRANDT and HEIDI BRANDT, MARSHALL FLADAGER and NEVA FLADAGER, and LARRY LAUTARET and RENA LAUTARET,

Plaintiffs/Counter
- Defendants/ Appellees/Cross
- Appellants ,

- vs R&R MOUNTAIN ESCAPES, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company,

Defendant

/Counterclaimant/ Appellant /Cross
- Appellee
. **ORDER GRANTING**

**SECOND UNOPPOSED**  **MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE OPENING BRIE**  **F**

Appellant R&R Mountain Escapes, LLC has filed a Second Unopposed Motion for Extension to File Opening Brief. Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that she has contacted counsel for Appellees and they do not object to this Motion. For good cause appearing, **IT IS ORDERED** that Appellant’s Motion f or Extension to File its Opening Brief is **GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED**  that Appellant shall have up to and including April 5 , 202 4 , to file its opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2024

02/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0716
Finamore, Robert (OST) 

From: Christophe Hubert [CHubert@dasnair.ch] '• •'- •XTT'TIP M 

Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:17AM '^^ '-nl/\l..J!\ ,_ 

To: Finamore, Robert(OST) ' :-::l).UlU;\^ 

Cc: Gaelle Boidin 

Subject: RE: Application of Dasnair for DOT Authority .^;i : TJ n o r:': [j 3 

Attachments: officialDOTapplicationpoint8.pdf 

Good morning i^r Finamore, 

I've talk with my boss about the baerer shares and he told me that no individual or entity holds 5% or more of shares 

Therefore, I've modified the application and send you the modified page. Do you need the whole application with the 

correction or one page is ok ? 

Thanks again for your help and cooperation. 

Best regards 

Christophe 

D e: Robert.Finamore@dot.Qov rmailto:Robert.Finamore(Q)dot.Qovl 

Envoye : vendredi 14 Janvier 2011 16:51 

A : Christophe Hubert 

Objet: Application of Dasnair for DOT Authority 

Hello Christophe, 

We've received the application of Dasnair for exemption/permit authority to serve the United States. It has been posted 

(you can use the link to view) and the 21 -day public answer period has begun. 

http://www.requlations.gov/#!docketDetail:dct=FR+PR+N+O+SR;rpp=10;so=DESC:sb=postedDate:po=0;D=DOT-OST2011-0010 

After initial review of the application, we've determined that more information is required with respect to the ownership of 

the carrier. You can file the information as a supplement to the original application. 

First, the application states that Mr. Gerard Limat hold 60% of the carrier's capital stock but no citizenship information is 

provided for him. 

Also, the application states that the remaining 40% is held by bearer shares. If any individual or entity holds 5% or more 

of shares, please provide those names and citizenship as well. If no individual or entity holds 5% or more of shares, 

please state so. 

Regards, 

Bob 

Robert J. Finamore 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of International Aviation, X-45 

Phone: (202)366-2405 

Fax: (202) 366-3694 
8. Ownership and Control of Applicant 

Dasnair is a Swiss company. 60% of the capital stock is owned by 

Mr Gerard Limat, a Swiss citizen and 40% of the capital stock is owned by bearer 

shares (no individual or entity holds 5% or more of shares). 

9. Homeland Government and Other Relationships 

Dasnair is a privately owned company and does not receive or expect to receive 

any financial assistance from the Swiss Government. Neither Dasnair nor its owners, 

officers, directors or managers holds any interest in a U.S. carrier or any other entity 

engaged in the business of aeronautics. 

10. History of Operations 

Dasnair is a privately held Swiss company headquartered in Geneva. It provides a 

global range of services in the areas of charter and management of business aircraft. 

The company was founded in 2001 by Mr Gerald Limat, the executive director. The 

initial aim was to manage a Falcon 900 EX which belonged to Mr Serge Dassault. 

In 2002, Dasnair obtained an AOC that allows operating as commercial 

operations. 

Dasnair has currently a team of 46 persons with a fleet of three aircrafts: one Falcon 

2000 LX and two Falcon 7X.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

OTIS NELSON, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-11775 

 Hon. Laurie J. Michelson 

 vs. Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION 

SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia 

Corporation; EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, an 

Ohio Corporation; TRANS UNION, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company; and 

FIRST PREMIER BANK, a foreign corporation; 

 Defendants. 

________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT, EQUIFAX INFORMATION 

SERVICES, LLC, ONLY, WITH PREJUDICE 

 Plaintiff and Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”), through their 

counsel, stipulate and agree that all claims herein between Plaintiff and Equifax 

have been settled and that Defendant Equifax should be dismissed with prejudice 

and without costs or fees awarded to either party. 

/s/ Gary D. Nitzkin /s/ Jordan S. Bolton 

GARY D. NITZKIN (P41155) JORDAN S. BOLTON (P66309) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

22142 West Nine Mile Road 500 Woodward Ave., Ste. 3500 

Southfield, MI 48033 Detroit, MI 48226 

(248) 353-2882 (313) 965-8300 

email – gnitzkin@creditor-law.com email – jbolton@clarkhill.com 

Case 2:15-cv-11775-LJM-MKM ECF No. 12 filed 06/08/15 PageID.112 Page 1 of 3
2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

OTIS NELSON, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-11775 

 Hon. Laurie J. Michelson 

 vs. Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION 

SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia 

Corporation; EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, an 

Ohio Corporation; TRANS UNION, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company; and 

FIRST PREMIER BANK, a foreign corporation; 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COST 

 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, Equifax Information 

Services, LLC, only, is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost to any 

party. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 8, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-11775-LJM-MKM ECF No. 12 filed 06/08/15 PageID.113 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys 

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on June 8, 2015. 

 s/Jane Johnson 

Case Manager to 

 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

 

Case 2:15-cv-11775-LJM-MKM ECF No. 12 filed 06/08/15 PageID.114 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 28, 2007, 1 p.m. to June 28, 2007, 3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 11, 2007, 72 FR 32129-32131.                

The meeting will be held July 23, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 15, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3076 Filed 6-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M