alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 29, 2011

|Filer                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BISCAYNE BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | After-the-fact change in control notice filed by Thomas Dunlap Lumpkin II, and Peyton White Lumpkin, Pinecrest, Florida, to retain 10.51 percent of the outstanding shares of Biscayne Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, Biscayne Bank, both of Coconut Grove, Florida. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/11/2011
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 02/11/2011   
|PEOPLES BANCSHARES, INC.  | * 3A1         | Peoples Bancshares, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of People Bank, both of  Mendenhall, Mississippi.                                                                                                                 | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/28/2011
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 02/28/2011   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending March 26, 2011

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANCO FINANCIERO Y DE AHORROS, S.A. | FBSEA          | Banco Financiero y de Ahorros, S.A., Valencia, Spain (formerly New Bank), to establish a branch to be located in Miami, Florida. | Newspaper:04/11/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 04/11/2011    
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable
|IBERIABANK                          | * 18C* Branch  | IBERIABANK, Lafayette, Louisiana, to merge with Omni Bank, Metairie, Louisiana.                                                  | Newspaper:04/19/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 04/19/2011    
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 76.23-1 Application. ( a ) Where a manual sprinkling system is installed, the provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 76.23-90, shall apply to all installations contracted for on or after November 19, 1952. Installations contracted for prior to November 19, 1952, shall meet the requirements of § 76.23-90.
( b ) [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,078,440
<SECURITIES>                                   000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   000
<INVENTORY>                                    000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               000
<PP&E>                                         000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,918,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          86,700
<BONDS>                                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          000
<PREFERRED>                                    000
<COMMON>                                       000
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,831,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,918,467
<SALES>                                        000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               713,166
<CGS>                                          000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               231,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                482,048
<INCOME-TAX>                                   000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            482,048
<DISCONTINUED>                                 000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                000
<CHANGES>                                      000
<NET-INCOME>                                   482,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .23
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending May 21, 2011

---





## Personnel

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 1 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the cita tion of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 2 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion ma y contain computer-generated errors or other 3 deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 4 filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 30,243 9 MICHAEL STRUBHAR, 10 Defendant-Appellant, 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 12 Stephen Bridgforth, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 M. Anne Kelley, Assistant Attorney General 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 for Appellee 18 Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender 19 Aric G. Elsenheimer, Assi stant Appellate Defender 20 Las Cruces, NM 21 for Appellant 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 23 FRY, Chief Judge. 24 Defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence on one count of forgery 25 entered after Defendant file d a conditional guilty plea [RP 177], reserving the right to 262 appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We issued a calendar notice 1 proposing to reverse because the forgery charge should have been brought in a 2 previous prosecution. The State has responded by informing us that it will not be 3 filing a memorandum in opposition. We therefore reverse the district court. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 10

11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 12
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8554
MITCHELL M. GARIONI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director; EDWARD C. MORRIS,Deputy Director; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Administrator; LONNIE SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center; J. H. LYLE, Lieutenant, Augusta Correctional Center Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-808-R) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 23, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Mitchell M. Garioni, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's report recommendingdismissal of this action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We also deny Appellant's motion for the preparation of a transcript at government's expense. See 28 U.S.C. 753(f) (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
*The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1076

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Allen J. Vopalka, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 12, 2000

Filed: May 18, 2000 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Following his conditional guilty plea to a drug charge, Allen J. Vopalka appeals

the district court's refusal to grant Vopalka's motion to suppress the search warrant.

Vopalka also contends the district court improperly calculated the drug quantity

attributable to him. Discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no

useful purpose. We have carefully considered Vopalka's contentions and find them to
-2-

be without merit. First, the affidavit and application for the search warrant establish

probable cause for issuance of the warrant. Second, the district court's drug quantity

findings are not clearly erroneous. We thus affirm Vopalka's conviction and sentence.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Frank Jiang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Great China International Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 11, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Frank Jiang
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  | Frank Jiang Chief Executive
Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.20-10 Plans.

(a) Before application for inspection is made, and before construction is started, the owner or builder shall have plans approved by the Commandant indicating the proposed arrangement and construction of the vessel. The procedure for submitting plans and the list of plans to be supplied is set forth in subpart 91.55.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 30, 1995 (53), Para 53.18 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 522]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.53.18  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. WALKER: Committee on Science. H.R. 655. A bill to 
     authorize the hydrogen research, development, and 
     demonstration programs of the Department of Energy, and for 
     other purposes; with amendments (Rept. No. 104-95). Referred 
     to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
     Union.
       Mr. CLINGER: Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. 
     H.R. 1345. A bill to eliminate budget deficits and management 
     inefficiencies in the government of the District of Columbia 
     through the establishment of the District of Columbia 
     Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority, 
     and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-96). Referred to the 
     Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-3185

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Delbert Clay Feezell

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

 ____________

 Submitted: May 2, 2019

Filed: May 7, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Delbert Clay Feezell directly appeals the within-Guidelines sentence the district

court1

 imposed after he pleaded guilty to receiving and distributing child pornography. 

1

The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

Western District of Missouri.
His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively

unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we find no basis to disturb the district court’s sentence. 

See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (stating

that sentences are reviewed under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and

discussing substantive reasonableness); United States v. St. Claire, 831 F.3d 1039,

1043 (8th Cir. 2016) (noting that a within-Guidelines sentence is accorded a

presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal); see also United States v.

Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (finding that, where a defendant “explicitly

and voluntarily” exposed himself to a specific sentence, a direct challenge to the

sentence was foreclosed).

 

Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant

counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending March 12, 2011

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|IBERIABANK            | * Branch       | IBERIABANK, Lafayette, Louisiana, to establish the following branches: 613 Montgomery Highway, Vestavia Hills, Alabama; and 1315 Indiantown Road, Jupiter, Florida. | Newspaper:03/18/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | 03/18/2011    
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable
|TECHE HOLDING COMPANY | * 3A1          | Teche Holding Company, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Teche Federal Bank, both of New Iberia, Louisiana.    | Newspaper:04/01/2011Federal Register:04/04/2011    
|Newspaper:            | 04/01/2011    
|Federal Register:     | 04/04/2011    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 8, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us