alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the “ Company”) on Form 10-KSB for theperiod ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned, constituting thechief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Mega Group, Inc.,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of their knowledge:

 
|   | (1) |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) |   | The information presented  in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|                |   | MEGA GROUP, INC. |
|---------------------|--------|------------------|
|                |   |             |   |
|                |   |             |   |
|                |   | By:              | /s/    JOHN H. BROWN, |
|                |   |             | **John H. Brown****Chief Executive  Officer** |
|                |   |             |   |
| Date: March 7, 2003 |   |             |   |
|                |   |             |   |
|                |   | MEGA GROUP, INC. |
|                |   |             |   |
|                |   |             |   |
|                |   | By:              | /s/    MERRITT C. BROWN |
|                |   |             | **Merritt C. Brown,****Chief Financial  Officer** |
|                |   |             |   |
| Date: March 7, 2003 |   |             |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION         I, William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer of Collegiate Pacific Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Collegiate Pacific Inc.for the annual period ended June 30, 2005; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;and   (c) disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this Report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: September 19, 2005                                             /s/ William R. Estill   William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,652-01

EX PARTE DAVID ROBERT STEINER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 722-A-CR IN THE 63RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM TERRELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

murder and one count of aggravated assault and was sentenced to imprisonment for thirty years on

the murder counts and twenty years on the aggravated assault count. He did not appeal his

convictions.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because the plea

agreement cannot be followed. The trial court held a live evidentiary hearing, made findings of fact
2

and conclusions of law, and recommended that we deny relief. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Huerta, 692

S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we

held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal

recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a second evidentiary hearing and Applicant is not represented

by counsel, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If he is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether it

believes Applicant’s convictions should be set aside under Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1985). The trial court shall also direct the District Clerk to forward a copy of the

reporter’s record of the evidentiary hearing held on April 23, 2015. The trial court shall also make

any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
3

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: July 1, 2015

Do not publish
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 30, 1995 (53), Para 53.5 Waiving Points of Order Against the Conference Report on H.R. 831]
[Page 519]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.53.5  waiving points of order against the conference report on h.r. 
          831

  Mr. QUILLEN, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 121):

       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be 
     in order to consider the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 831) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
     permanently extend the deduction for the health insurance 
     costs of self-employed individuals, to repeal the provision 
     permitting nonrecognition of gain on sales and exchanges 
     effectuating policies of the Federal Communications 
     Commission, and for other purposes. All points of order 
     against the conference report and against its consideration 
     are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
     read.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  Mr. QUILLEN moved the previous question on the resolution to its 
adoption or rejection.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House now order the previous question?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. GOODLATTE, announced that the yeas had 
it.
  Mr. FROST objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

224

When there appeared

Nays

201
```
#### Erie Railroad Company, Appellant, *v.*John Williams, as Commissioner of Labor of the State of New York, Respondent.

*Erie R. R. Co.*v. *Williams,*136 App. Div. 902, affirmed.

(Argued February 28, 1910;

decided June 14, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 11, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from instituting any action or proceeding against the plaintiff for the recovery of penalties for violations of the provisions of the Labor Law requiring railroad corporations to pay their employees semi-monthly in cash.

*George F. Oroutt*and *George F. Brownell*for appellant.

*Edward li.*O’Malley, *Attorney-General (Edioard H. Letohworth*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.*v. *Williams*(199 N. Y. 108).

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
| Skip Nav                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   SFA Library - Archive SFA Publications - Regulation Compilation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| **Regulations Compilations:**Compilations of all SFA related regulations were produced at the end of each calendar year through 1998.Beginning in 1999, we created quarterly compilations.The quarterly compilations reflect only those Parts of the Regulations that have been updated by final regulations, since the last update.FSA has discontinued producing the regulation compilations.

For current regulations, please visit GPO's eCFR site at:http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/34cfrv3_01.html#600
- As Of 06/01/2000
- As Of 12/31/1999
- As Of 09/30/1999
- As Of 06/30/1999
- As Of 12/31/1998
- As Of 12/31/1997
- As Of 09/30/1996
- As Of 06/30/1995
- As Of 12/01/1994
- By Regulation Compilation Part |
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS14628 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
98-2500.

#### State ex rel. Rentz v. Ramsey.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss of Donald Ramsey and on motion to dismiss of Judge Erich O’Brien. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2401 

To increase public safety and reduce the threat to domestic security by 

including persons who may be prevented from boarding an aircraft in 

the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2009 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York (for herself and Mr. ISRAEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase public safety and reduce the threat to domestic 

security by including persons who may be prevented from 

boarding an aircraft in the National Instant Criminal 

Background Check System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Fly, No Buy Act 

5 of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2401 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF PERSONS WHO MAY BE PREVENTED 

2 FROM BOARDING AN AIRCRAFT IN THE NA3 TIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND 

4 CHECK SYSTEM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 103(f) of the Brady 

6 Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 922 note) 

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘, notwithstanding any regulation 

8 prescribed under section 40119(b) of title 49, United 

9 States Code’’ before the period. 

10 (b) TRANSFER OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF FIREARM

11 TO SUCH PERSONS.—Section 922(d) of title 18, United 

12 States Code, is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

14 (8); 

15 (2) by striking the period at the end of para16 graph (9) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

17 (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol18 lowing: 

19 ‘‘(10) is an individual who is required, under 

20 regulations prescribed under section 114(h) of title 

21 49, United States Code, to be prevented from board22 ing an aircraft.’’. 

23 (c) SHIPMENT, TRANSPORT, POSSESSION, OR RE24 CEIPT OF FIREARM BY SUCH PERSONS.—Section 922(g) 

25 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2401 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

2 (8); 

3 (2) by striking the comma at the end of para4 graph (9) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(10) who is an individual who is required, 

8 under regulations prescribed under section 114(h) of 

9 title 49, United States Code, to be prevented from 

10 boarding an aircraft,’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending March 12, 2011

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BBJ INCORPORATED  | CIC            | Notification by Russell W. Blaha, Ord, Nebraska, to acquire control of BBJ, Inc., parent of First National Bank in Ord, both in Ord, Nebraska.                          | Newspaper:03/24/2011Federal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:        | 03/24/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not available 
|FIRSTBANK         | * 18C* Branch  | FirstBank, Lakewood, Colorado, to merge with FirstBank of Arizona, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, and to operate under the charter and title of FirstBank, Lakewood, Colorado. | Newspaper:03/31/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 03/31/2011    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 56.20-5 Marking (modifies 107.2).

Marking must be in accordance with MSS SP-25 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2).

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

y1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141180

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141180 COA: 296415 Genesee CC: 90-042684-FC BARRY CARLTON CLARDY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 21, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
     Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30870, 333-36140, 333-83282,333-10037, 333-111458 and 333-111459)of Therma-Wave, Inc. of our report dated June 27, 2005 relating to the consolidated financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
§ 58.30-10 Hydraulic fluid. ( a ) The requirements of this section are applicable to all fluid power transmission and control systems installed on vessels subject to inspection.
( b ) The fluid used in hydraulic power transmission systems must have a flashpoint of not less than 200 °F for pressures below 150 psig and 315 °F for pressures 150 psig and above, as determined by ASTM D92 (incorporated by reference, see § 58.03-1), Cleveland “Open Cup” test method.
( c ) The chemical and physical properties of the hydraulic fluid must be suitable for use with any materials in the system or components thereof.
( d ) The hydraulic fluid must be suitable for operation of the hydraulic system through the entire temperature range to which it may be subjected in service.
( e ) The recommendations of the system component manufacturers must be considered in the selection and use of hydraulic fluid.
#### § 525.4 OMB control number assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Commission has received Office of Management and Budget approval for this collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended. In accordance with that Act, agencies are required to display a currently valid control number. In this regard, the valid control number for this collection of information is 3072-0061.
#### § 1018.24 Contact with the debtor's employing agency.

If a debtor is employed by the Federal government or is a member of the military establishment or the Coast Guard, and collection by offset cannot be accomplished in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5514, the Board shall contact the employing agency to arrange with the debtor for payment of the indebtedness by allotment or otherwise.