31646 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices 

which the information collection 

calculations are based have not 

changed, the information collection 

burden hours have changed based on 

new information available to the 

Department. As stated above, the 

estimated total burden hours has been 

reduced from 8753 to 3418. 

ICR 2105–0551, ‘‘Reporting 

Requirements for Disability-Related 

Complaints’’

(1) Requirement to read, record and 

categorize each disability related 

complaint from a passenger or on behalf 

of a passenger. 

Respondents: Certificated U.S. air 

carriers and foreign air carriers 

operating to and from the United States 

that conduct passenger-carrying service 

with large aircraft. 

Estimated Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 0 minutes to 875 hours a 

year for each respondent (time to record 

and categorize one complaint [15 

minutes] multiplied by the number of 

complaints respondents receive [0 

complaint a year to 3,500 annual 

complaints a year]. The number of 

complaints received by carriers varies 

greatly. In 2003, we estimated that 

carriers would receive anywhere from 1 

complaint a year to 4,000 annual 

complaints a year. Based on data 

provided by carriers in 2004, 2005, and 

2006, we believe that a range of 0 to 

3500 annual complaints a year is more 

accurate. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 3238 

hours for all respondents (time to record 

and categorize one complaint [15 

minutes] multiplied by the total number 

of complaints for all respondents 

[12,952]). In 2003, we estimated that the 

total number of complaints for all 

respondents would be 33,050. Based on 

a review of the data provided by 

carriers, it appears that our 2003 

estimate was too high. Carriers received 

a total of 11,508 complaints in 2004, a 

total of 13,584 complaints in 2005, and 

a total of 13,764 complaints in 2006 for 

an average of 12,952 annual complaints. 

Frequency: 0 to 3,000 complaints per 

year for each respondent (Some carriers 

may not receive any complaint in a 

given year while some of the larger 

operators could receive 3,000 annual 

complaints). 

(2) Requirement to submit a report to 

DOT summarizing the disability-related 

complaint data (key-punching webbased matrix report). 

Respondents: Certificated U.S. air 

carriers and foreign air carriers 

operating to and from the United States 

that conduct passenger-carrying service 

with large aircraft. 

Estimated Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 30 minutes a year for each 

respondent to type in the 169 items 

(matrix consists of 13 disabilities and 13 

service problems). 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 80 

hours for all respondents (annual 

burden [30 minutes] multiplied by the 

total number respondents [160]). In 

2003, we estimated the total number of 

respondents to be anywhere from 295 to 

370. However, based on the number of 

carriers that reported data in 2004, 2005 

and 2006 as well as the carriers that did 

not but should have submitted such 

data, we now believe that the total 

number of respondents is approximately 

160. 

Frequency: 1 report to DOT per year 

for each respondent. 

Estimated Number of Responses: 160 

(frequency of report [1 per year] 

multiplied by the total number of 

respondents [160]. 

(3) Requirement to retain 

correspondence and record of action 

taken on all disability-related 

complaints for three years. 

Respondents: Foreign air carriers 

operating to and from the United States 

that conduct passenger carrying service 

with large aircraft. 

Estimated Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 1 hour a year for each 

respondent. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 100 

hours for all respondents (annual 

burden [1 hour] multiplied by the total 

number respondents [100]. In 2003, we 

estimated that the total number of 

foreign air carriers that would be 

required to submit an annual report to 

DOT would be 231 to 306. However, we 

have found that not all of the foreign air 

carriers that have authority to fly into 

the U.S. actually do so. It appears that 

the total number of foreign air carriers 

that would be covered is approximately 

100. 

Frequency: 0 to 300 complaints per 

year for each respondent. The data 

provided by foreign air carriers 

operating to and from the United States 

that conduct passenger carrying service 

with large aircraft demonstrates that that 

number of complaints received by such 

carriers varies greatly from a low of 0 to 

a high of almost 300. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of 

the Department’s estimate of the burden 

of the proposed information collection; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

As noted earlier, OST published a 

Federal Register notice with a 60 day 

comment period for this ICR on 

Thursday, March 1, 2007 (72 FR 9385). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 30, 

2007, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 

part 1. 

Rosalind A. Knapp, 

Acting General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. E7–11094 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge 

(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Monthly notice of PFC 

approvals and disapprovals. 

In May 2007, there were seven 

applications approved. This notice also 

includes information on four 

applications, one approved in February 

2007 and the other three approved in 

April 2007, inadvertently left off the 

February 2007 and April 2007 notices, 

respectively. Additionally, 12 approved 

amendments to previously approved 

applications are listed. 

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monty 

notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals 

and disapprovals under the provisions 

of the Aviation Safety and Capacity 

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the 

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 

1990) (Pub. L. No. 101–508) and Part 

158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(14 CFR Part 158). This notice is 

published pursuant to paragraph d of 

§ 158.29. 

PFC Applications Approved 

Public Agency: City of Little Rock, 

Arkansas. 

Application Number: 07–06–C–00–

LIT. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $21,763,270. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: May 1, 

2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

January 1, 2011. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices 31647 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Little Rock 

National Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

In-line baggage system. 

Improve airport drainage—phase II. 

Taxiway in-pavement edge and 

centerline lights. 

Interactive employee training system. 

Friction testing vehicle. 

Terminal planning documents. 

Brief Description of Project Partially 

Approved for Collection and Use: 

Passenger loading bridge acquisition 

and replacement. 

Determination: The acquisition of a 

loading bridge for gate No. 8 is not 

approved. The public agency did not 

provide adequate information to 

confirm that it could meet the 

requirements of Part 158, Assurance No. 

8 for this loading bridge. 

Decision Date: February 27, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Glenn Boles, Arkansas/Oklahoma 

Airports Development Office, (817) 222–

5661. 

Public Agency: County of Houghton, 

Calumet, Michigan. 

Application Number: 07–11–C–00–

CMX. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $464,744. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

November 2, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

February 1, 2013. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: None 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Vegetation removal to reduce wildlife 

habitat. 

Air service grant for airport security. 

FAA navigational aids. 

Rehabilitate taxiway B. 

Snow removal equipment 

procurement (motor grader). 

Terminal study, cost benefit analysis. 

Master plan study airport layout plan 

update. 

Pavement management program 

report. 

Rehabilitate/relocate airport entrance 

road. 

Snow removal equipment 

procurement (material spreader). 

PFC preparation reimbursement. 

PFC audit reimbursement. 

Firearm procurement. 

Fire inspection program. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection: Remove sewage lagoons. 

Decision Date: April 12, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Jason Watt, Detroit Airports District 

Office, (734) 239–2906. 

Public Agency: County of Gogebic, 

Ironwood, Michigan. 

Application Number: 07–02–C–00–

IWD. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $133,060. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: June 1, 

2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

February 1, 2017. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Charter and air taxi 

operators. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Gogebic—

Iron County Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Airport layout plan. 

Environmental assessment and 

preliminary design engineering. 

Security fencing. 

Environmental assessment and 

preliminary design engineering for 

crosswind runway phase 2 and 

wildlife study. 

Acquire snow removal equipment. 

Passenger parking lot. 

Acquire meter friction tester, wind 

cones, and fire suits. 

Acquire and install 12,000-gallon Jet 

A fuel tank. 

Decision Date: April 27, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Jason Watt, Detroit Airports District 

Office, (734) 229–2906. 

Public Agency: John Murtha 

Johnstown—Cambria County Airport 

Authority, Johnstown, Pennsylvania. 

Application Number: 07–05–C–00–

JST. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $132,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: July 1, 

2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

April 1, 2010. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Nonscheduled/on 

demand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at 

Johnstown—Cambria County Airport. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use: Terminal 

building construction. 

Decision Date: April 30, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: Lori 

Ledebohm, Harrisburg Airports District 

Office, (717) 730–2835. 

Public Agency: City of Hailey and 

County of Blaine, Hailey, Idaho. 

Application Number: 07–06–C–00–

SUN. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $691,368. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

December 1, 2009. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial 

operators. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Friedman 

Memorial Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Runway safety area improvements. 

Runway 13/31 reconstruction. 

Environmental Impact statement 

(phase 1) for replacement airport. 

Security enhancements. 

PFC administrative costs for 

application 05–05. 

PFC administrative costs for 

application 07–06. 

Decision Date: May 3, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Suzanne Lee-Pang, Seattle Airports 

District Office, (425) 227–2654. 

Public Agency: City of Naples Airport 

Authority, Naples, Florida. 

Application Number: 07–05–C–00–

APF. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: Not applicable. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $92,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

Decision uses excess PFC revenue—no 

new collections authorized. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

Not applicable. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Rehabilitate taxiway B (design). 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
31648 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices 

Decision Date: May 8, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Susan Moore, Orlando Airports District 

Office, (407) 812–6331, extension 120. 

Public Agency: Metropolitan 

Nashville Airport Authority, Nashville, 

Tennessee. 

Application Number: 07–13–C–00–

BNA. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $19,250,588. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: June 1, 

2011. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

November 1, 2011. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Nashville 

International Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Security checkpoint (design and 

construction). 

Terminal renovation. 

Reconstruct taxiway Bravo south 

(design). 

Reconstruct taxiway Alpha south 

(design). 

Outbound baggage conveyor system 

(design and construction). 

Access control system replacement 

(design and construction). 

Construct 2L/20R runway safety area. 

Pavement management and 

modification of standards 

identification study. 

Runway weather information system. 

Construct 2R/20L runway safety area. 

Land acquisition for Elm Hill Pike. 

Aircraft flight track monitoring 

system. 

Decision Date: May 10, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Peggy Kelley, Memphis Airports District 

Office, (901) 322–8186. 

Public Agency: Airport Authority of 

Washoe County, Reno, Nevada. 

Application Number: 07–10–C–00–

RNO. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $32,878,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

December 1, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

December 1, 2010. 

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required 

To Collect PFC’s: (1) Nonscheduled/on 

demand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31; and (2) commuter or small 

certificated air carriers filing Form 

T–100. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that each proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Reno/ 

Tahoe International Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use at a $4.50 PFC 

Level: 

Jet bridge equipment upgrade. 

South air cargo ramp—phase 1. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use at a $3.00 PFC 

Level: Concourse elbow build out phase 

II. 

Brief Description of Project Partially 

Approved for Collection and Use at 

$3.00 PFC Level: Acquire replacement 

snow removal equipment. 

Decision Date: May 11, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Ronald Biaco, San Francisco Airports 

District Office, (650) 876–2778, 

extension 626. 

Public Agency: Metropolitan Topeka 

Airport Authority, Topeka, Kansas. 

Application Number: 07–01–C–00–

FOE. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $823,720. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

March 1, 2023. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Overlay ramp north of terminal. 

Auxiliary generator. 

Airfield signage. 

Snow removal equipment. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

equipment. 

Runway 13/31 rehabilitation. 

Airport master plan update. 

Foreign object debris sweeper. 

Taxiways A, B, C, and D 

rehabilitation. 

PFC application and administration 

fees. 

Decision Date: May 18, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Jeffrey Deitering, Central Region 

Airports Division, (816) 329–2637. 

Public Agency: City and Borough of 

Sitka, Alaska. 

Application Number: 07–01–C–00–

SIT. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $1,100,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: July 1, 

2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

June 1, 2012 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: Rehabilitate 

terminal building. 

Decision Date: May 21, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: John 

Lovett, Alaska Region Airports Division, 

(907) 271–5446. 

Public Agency: Niagara Frontier 

Transportation Authority, Buffalo, New 

York. 

Application Number: 07–06–C–00–

BUF. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $75,389,056. 

Charge Effective Date for $3.00 

Collections: October 1, 2005. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date for 

$4.50 Collections: August 1, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

August 1, 2011. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Buffalo 

Niagara International Airport (BUF). 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at BUF and Use at BUF 

at a $4.50 PFC Level: 

Purchase safety equipment—aircraft 

rescue and firefighting/emergency 

response vehicles. 

Design and construction, extension 

and rehabilitation of runway 5/23. 

Design and construction, extension 

and rehabilitation of taxiway A. 

Automatic baggage system. 

Design and construction of a water 

quality treatment and improvement 

system. 

Design and implement noise 

mitigation measures. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at BUF and Use at BUF 

at a $3.00 PFC Level: 

Relocation of security checkpoints. 

Runway 14/32 safety improvements 

and relocate remote fuel dispensing 

facility. 

Passenger movement equipment. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices 31649 

Upgrade security badging system. 

PFC planning and program 

administration. 

Series 1999 debt service—east 

concourse terminal extension and 

apron expansion, and east access 

improvements. 

Design and construction, extension of 

runway 14/32. 

Design and construction, extension, 

widening, and rehabilitation of 

taxiway D. 

Design and construction, overhead 

canopies for pedestrian walkways. 

Purchase of surface friction testing 

equipment. 

Internal perimeter road extension. 

PFC planning and program 

administration. 

Brief Description of Project Partially 

Approved for Collection at BUF and Use 

at BUF at a $3.00 PFC Level: 

Procurement of security equipment—

vehicles. 

Determination: Two K–9 vehicles and 

a ‘‘captain’s vehicle’’ were found to be 

ineligible because the public agency did 

not provide documentation that the 

Transportation Security Administration 

had concurred that these vehicles were 

a part of the minimum amount of 

equipment needed to meet the approved 

security plan. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection at BUF and Use at BUF 

and at Niagara Falls International 

Airport at a $3.00 PFC Level: Purchase 

snow removal equipment. 

Brief Description of Disapproved 

Project: PFC planning and program 

administration. 

Determination: The public agency 

included this project as a part of an 

amendment request. However, this 

project was not included in the original 

decision and a public agency cannot 

add a new project by amendment. 

Decision Date: May 25, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Larry A’Hearn, New York Airports 

District Office, (516) 227–3810. 

Amendment to PFC Approvals 

Amendment No. 

City, state 

Amendment 

approved 

date 

Original 

approved net 

PFC revenue 

Amended 

approved net 

PFC revenue 

Original 

estimated 

charge 

exp. date 

Amended 

estimated 

charge 

exp. date 

01–08–C–02–CMX .......................................................................

Hancock, MI ................................................................................. 04/12/07 $254,644 $268,191 10/01/05 10/01/05 

04–03–C–01–HGR .......................................................................

Hagerstown, MD .......................................................................... 04/25/07 415,188 108,124 12/01/07 12/01/07 

*03–05–C–01–MBS .....................................................................

Saginaw, MI ................................................................................. 04/30/07 1,378,794 1,378,794 08/01/09 04/01/08 

99–03–C–01–CIC ........................................................................

Chico, CA ..................................................................................... 05/08/07 89,300 25,000 02/01/01 02/01/01 

04–08–C–02–RNO .......................................................................

Reno, NV ..................................................................................... 05/08/07 21,749,000 26,712,865 08/01/07 08/01/07 

95–01–C–02–EAU .......................................................................

Eau Claire, WI .............................................................................. 05/08/07 757,028 708,253 09/01/05 01/01/06 

05–05–C–02–SJU ........................................................................

San Juan, PR .............................................................................. 05/15/07 334,635,482 352,632,482 05/01/27 11/01/28 

96–01–C–02–TRI .........................................................................

Bristol, TN .................................................................................... 05/16/07 5,859,025 5,273,873 11/01/05 11/01/05 

97–03–C–01–MSN .......................................................................

Madison, WI ................................................................................. 05/17/07 2,305,000 2,340,000 12/01/99 12/01/99 

98–04–C–02–JST ........................................................................

Johnstown, PA ............................................................................. 05/18/07 628,121 496,121 10/01/06 01/01/07 

97–03–C–06–DFW ......................................................................

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX .................................................................. 05/18/07 121,412,427 114,679,598 04/01/01 04/01/01 

*99–02–C–01–TRI .......................................................................

Bristo, TN ..................................................................................... 05/24/07 5,829,873 5,247,633 08/01/13 03/01/12 

Note: The amendments denoted by an 

asterisk (*) include a change to the PFC level 

charged from $3.00 per enplaned passenger 

to $4.50 per enplaned passenger. For 

Saginaw, MI and Bristol, TN, this change is 

effective on July 1, 2007. 

Issued in Washington, DC on June 4, 2007. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Facility Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 07–2833 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Environmental Impact Statement; Maui 

County, HI 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), Hawaii 

Department of Transportation (HDOT). 

ACTION: Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) is issuing this 

notice to advise the public that an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

will be prepared to evaluate alternatives 

that would improve the roadway 

capacity, safety, and reliability of 

Honoapiilani Highway between Maalaea 

and Launiupoko on the west side of the 

island of Maui. This section of highway 

is the main travel way for people and 

goods between West Maui and the rest 

of the island. 

The EIS will be prepared in 

accordance with regulations 

implementing the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as 

well as provisions of the recently 

enacted Safe, Accountable, Flexible, 

Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A 

Legacy of Users (SAFETEA–LU). The 

purpose of this Notice of intent is to 

alert interested parties regarding the 

plan to prepare the EIS, to provide 

information on the nature of the 

proposed project, to invite participation 

in the EIS process, including comments 

on the scope of the EIS proposed in this 

notice, and to announce that a public 

scoping meeting will be conducted. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES