alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 5, 2011

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | Investment     | State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street International Holdings, both of Boston, Massachusetts, seek prior notice pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K to invest in two private limited companies located in New Delhi, India and the United Kingdom in excess of the aggregate investment limits. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-2084.

#### State ex rel. Strothers v. Cleveland Parking Violations Bur.

In Mandamus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      21.1**








Dynex
      Capital, Inc.


List
      of
      Consolidated Entities


As
      of
      December 31, 2005














Dynex
      Commercial Services, Inc.


Dynex
      Securities, Inc.


GLS
      Capital Services, Inc.


GLS
      Development, Inc.


SMFC
      Funding Corporation


MSC
      I
      L.P.


Issued
      Holdings Capital Corporation


Commercial
      Capital Access One, Inc.


Resource
      Finance Co. One


Resource
      Finance Co. Two


ND
      Holding Co.


MERIT
      Securities Corporation


Financial
      Asset Securitization, Inc.


GLS
      Capital, Inc.


GLS
      Properties, LLC


Allegheny
      Commercial Properties I, LLC


Allegheny
      Income Properties I, LLC


Allegheny
      Special Properties, LLC


GLS
      Capital Services - Marlborough, Inc.


SHF
      Corp.

















**NOTE:**
            All
                companies were incorporated in Virginia except for GLS Properties,
                LLC,
                Allegheny Commercial Properties I, LLC, Allegheny Income Properties
                I,
                LLC, and Allegheny Special Properties, LLC
                (Pennsylvania).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 19, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|NEW CENTURY BANK  | CIC         | Jay Sidhu, Mohnton, PA, to purchase up to 13%  of the voting shares of New Century Bank, Phoenixville, PA. | Newspaper:10/05/2009Federal Register:10/05/2009
|Newspaper:        | 10/05/2009 
|Federal Register: | 10/05/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2810 Lower Tribunal No. 22CF0 1 1827AOR

_____________________________ Q UAVARI K HIRY C UMMINGS , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Alison Kerestes , Judge.

A pril 23, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

TRAVER
, C

. J. , and NARDELLA and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINA L UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
§ 78.40-10 No smoking permitted. ( a ) The master shall have appropriate “No Smoking” signs posted and shall take all necessary precautions to prevent smoking or carrying of lighted or smoldering cigars, cigarettes, etc., in the deck area assigned to automobiles or other vehicles.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 188.10-77 Vessel.

Where the word “vessel” is used in this subchapter, it shall be considered to include all inspected and certificated oceanographic research vessels as listed in Column 7 of Table 188.05-1(a).

[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1113, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 77-081, 46 FR 56204, Nov. 16, 1981]
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’sknowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: August 8, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:August 8, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 10.81 Improper disclosure.

Any officer or employee of the Department who by virtue of his or her employment or official position, has possession of, or access to, agency records which contain individually identifiable information the disclosure of which is prohibited by this part and who knowing that disclosure of the specific material is so prohibited, willfully discloses the material in any manner to any person or agency not entitled to receive it, is guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(1).
#### CLIFTON et al. v. McSHANE.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 19, 1912.)

No. 1,991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.

H. N. Atkinson (H. & A. R. Mas*1020terson, D. F. Rowe, F. B. Stanley, and A. L. Davis, on the brief), for appellants.

Stuart R. Smith and Leon Sonfield (Smith, Crawford & Sonfield, on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

When the complainant below dismissed his bill, the defendants were not in court with any proper cross-bill or other proper proceedings which they were entitled to have retained in court for further hearing. The decree appealed from is affirmed.
#### B. L. Jones v. The State.

*No. 322.*

*Decided February 3.*

1. Keeping Open on Election Day.—The law expressly prohibits the opening of saloons “ during any portion of the day on which an election is held.” Penal Code, art. 178.

*2.*Same—“Day,” Definition of.—A day means twenty-four hours, and begins at midnight and continues to the succeeding midnight, within the purview of this statute.

3. Same—Ignorance of Law.—Ignorance of a law can not be pleaded in justification of its violation.

Appeal from the County Court of Wichita. Tried below before Hon. W. P. Skeen, County Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted by information, jointly with one McPherson, for keeping open a saloon or bar room on the 27th day of December, 1892, a day upon which a special election was being held. At the trial McPherson was acquitted, and defendant convicted, his punishment being affixed at a pecuniary fine of Si 00.

The evidence shows that the saloon was opened at about 6 o’clock p. m., on the evening of the election. It was proved for the defense by Davis, the city marshal, that the mayor of the city had told him to tell the saloon keepers “they could open on this election day, as the polls were closed, and as it was a city election. I so informed them, and they opened.”

*534No brief on file for appellant.

*JR. L. Henry,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The information charges appellant with having opened and kept open his saloon in the city of Wichita Falls on a certain day in which an election was held in said city. The information correctly charged the offense under the first clause of article 178 of the Penal Code.

The saloon was opened at 9 o’clock at night of the day on which the election was held. Defendant sought to justify on the ground that an officer informed him “that it would be no violation to open the saloon within the corporate limits after the election had closed.” This did not constitute a mistake of fact. The law expressly prohibits the opening of saloons “during any portion of the day on which an election is held.” A day means twenty-four hours, and begins at midnight and continues till the succeeding midnight, within the purview of this statute.

Ignorance of the law can not be pleaded in justification of its violation.

The charge was correct, the special charges were properly refused, the evidence supports the conviction, and the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Judges all present and concurring.
§ 1.27a Delegations to the Career Deputy General Counsel. The career Deputy General Counsel is delegated authority to: ( a ) Serve as the Department's Designated Agency Ethics Official in accordance with 5 CFR 2638.202;
( b ) Serve as the Department's Dispute Resolution Specialist pursuant to section 3(b) of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-320, 5 U.S.C. App.; and
( c ) Serve as the Department's Chief FOIA Officer under 5 U.S.C. 552(j).
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 25, 2011

----

Bank Holding Companies            Bank of Montreal, Toronto, Canada, and its subsidiaries, Harris Financial Corp., Chicago, Illinois; Harris Bankcorp, Inc.; and Mike Merger Sub, LLC -- application to acquire Marshall & Ilsley Corporation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; M&I  Marshall & Ilsley Bank; M&I Bank of Mayville, Mayville; M&I Bank FSB, Las Vegas, Nevada; and other nonbanking subsidiaries of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation.            -Approved, June 20, 2011                        United Bankshares, Inc., Charleston, West Virginia, and UBC Holding Company, Inc. -- to acquire Centra Financial Holdings, Inc., Morgantown, and its subsidiary bank, Centra Bank, Inc.            -Approved, June 20, 2011            Regulations and Policies            Internet Banking Authentication -- interagency supplemental supervisory guidance on customer authentication for Internet banking.            -Approved, June 11, 2011            (A/C)          
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

OFFICE OFTHE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR



## 16 DEC 

### 1991

TheHonorable Fife Syrnington Governor of Arizona 1700West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Dear Governor Symington:
Thepurpose of this letter is to notify you.that, pursuant to section 179(a)(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act) as amended in 1990,the United States Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) is making a finding today that the Stateof Arizona has failed tosubmit 

### a required PM,, (particulate matter 10micrometers or less in size) State implementationplan (SIP) for the Douglas and Nogales PM,, nonattainment areas. The deadline for submittal of these PM,, SIPSwas November 15, 1991.
There is evidence that the PM!, air quality in these areas is impacted by emissions from Mexico. We arecurrently working with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to quantify the impact of emissions from Mexico andspecialfunding for this effort should be available in the near future. Though there areprovisions in the Act that address international border areas, the Statemust demonstrate through the SIP process that Douglas and Nogales would attain the federal standards by the applicable attainment date if it were not for pollutant transport across United States borders.
If within 18months of this letter the Stateof Arizona does not correct the failure to submit that triggered this findingby submitting 

### a PM,, SIPfor Douglas and Nogales, then EPAwill be mandated to use its authorityunder section 179and 110(m)of the amended Act to impose atleast one sanction identified in section 179(b) onthese two nonattainment areas. If the failure to submit is not corrected within 24 months of this letter, EPAwill again be mandated to impose the second sanction identified in section 179(b). These sanctions include prohibition of highway funding and emission offsets of at least 2 to 1. In addition, section 110(c)of the amended Act provides that EPA promulgate a Federal implementation plan (FIP) no later than 2years after a finding of failure to submit.

Prinred on Recycled PaperI want to assure you that EPA will not impose any sanctions orpromulgate a FIP in response to this finding until after the State of Arizona and others have had an opportunity to comment on anupcoming Federal Register notice proposing sanctions and FIPs.
I want to emphasize that this finding solely concernswhether a plan has or has not been submitted to EPA. TheEPA takes its-responsibilityto administer the Act in a fair andjust manner very seriously and this finding is an exercise of that responsibility. I look forward to working closely with your staff to ensure that the Act's requirements are met in a timely and effective manner and, if at all possible, without adverse consequences. If you have any questions concerningthis finding your staffmay contact David P. Howekamp, Director of the Air and Toxics Division. Sincerely,

Daniel W. McGovern Regional Administrator

cc: Edward 

### Z. Fox Director, ADEQ Nancy Wrona

Assistant Director for Air Quality, ADEQ
#### § 308.524 Application for cancellation of Open Cargo Policy, Form MA-304.

The standard form of application for cancellation of an Open Cargo Policy Form MA-304 may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SEAN ANDRE WILSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-135, CA-97-1294-JFM) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Andre Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilson , Nos. CR-90-135; CA-97-1294-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1544 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1544

    To prohibit the formation of private paramilitary organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 1995

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the formation of private paramilitary organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Domestic Insurgency Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. PARAMILITARY ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 115 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 2392. Paramilitary organizations
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly participates in a paramilitary organization 
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, 
or both.
    ``(b) As used in this section, the term `paramilitary organization' 
means two or more individuals acting together, organized in a military 
or paramilitary structure, who knowingly--
            ``(1) possess firearms, explosives, incendiary devices, or 
        other weapons or techniques capable of causing injury or death 
        to individuals; or
            ``(2) provide or participate in training in the use of any 
        such weapons or techniques;
with the intention that such weapons or techniques be used unlawfully 
to oppose the authority of the United States or of any State or for any 
other unlawful purpose.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 115 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``2392. Paramilitary organizations.''.
                                 <all>
```