alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 26, 2009

|Filer                                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE INTERNATIONAL INC. | Investment     | Key Equipment Finance International, Superior, Colorado,("KEFI") to make a portfolio investment of $1.5 million in Key Equipment Finance Taiwan Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China("KEFT")pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                               | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CORTLAND SVG & BKG CO, CORTLAND, OHIO | 846619 | 09/14/2009 | 12/21/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 3, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 36339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3259]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 3, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 36339]]

                Executive Order 13437 of June 28, 2007

                
Waiver Under the Trade Act of 1974 With Respect 
                to Turkmenistan

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including sections 402(c)(2) and (d) of the 
                Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the ``Act'')(19 U.S.C. 
                2432(c)(2) and (d)), and having made the report to the 
                Congress set forth in section 402(c)(2), I hereby waive 
                the application of subsections (a) and (b) of section 
                402 of the Act with respect to Turkmenistan.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    June 28, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-3259
Filed 7-2-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
#### § 72.15-5 Structural fire protection.

See § 72.05-50 for ventilation requirements pertaining to structural fire protection.

[CGD 72-104R, 37 FR 14233, July 18, 1972]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 12, 2011

|Filer              | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------ | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|F.N.B. CORPORATION | * 4c8       | F.N.B. Corporation, Hermitage, Pennsylvania to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Parkvale Financial Corporation, Monroeville, Pennsylvania, and thereby indirectly acquire Parkvale Savings Bank, Monroeville, Pennsylavania | Newspaper:12/05/2011Federal Register:12/05/2011
|Newspaper:         | 12/05/2011 
|Federal Register:  | 12/05/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 42.05-50 New vessel. ( a ) As used in this part 42, for a vessel engaged on international voyages or on domestic voyages by sea, the term *new vessel* means a vessel, the keel of which is laid, or which is at a similar stage of construction, on or after July 21, 1968. (See § 42.05-30 for definition of an existing vessel.) ( 1 ) This definition applies to all vessels of countries signatory to or acceding to the 1966 Convention prior to April 21, 1968, and to vessels of countries not adhering to an applicable Convention as indicated in Article 16(4) of the 1966 Convention.
( 2 ) For countries which accede to the 1966 Convention after April 21, 1968, a *new vessel* (foreign) shall be one whose keel is constructively laid 3 months or more after such date.
( b ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) As used in part 44 of this subchapter, for a vessel marked with load lines for special service on a coastwise or interisland voyage, the term *new vessel* means one whose keel is laid on or after September 28, 1937. (See § 44.01-20 of this subchapter.)
( e ) As used in part 45 of this subchapter, for a vessel engaged solely on Great Lakes voyages, the term *new vessel* means one whose keel is laid on or after August 27, 1936. (See § 45.01-10 of this subchapter.)
( f ) As used in part 46 of this subchapter, for a passenger vessel marked with subdivision load lines, the term *new vessel* means a vessel whose keel is laid or is converted to such service on or after May 26, 1965. (See § 46.05-25 of this subchapter.)
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10051, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGD 80-120, 47 FR 5722, Feb. 8, 1982]
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.33-15 Transfers. A cargo authorized under § 98.33-3 of this part may not be transferred to or from a portable tank or IBC authorized under § 98.33-5 of this part unless the following requirements are met: ( a ) *Cargo pumps* comply with § 98.30-14 of this part;
( b ) *Ground connection* complies with § 98.30-15 of this part;
( c ) *Leakage containment* complies with § 98.30-17 of this part;
( d ) *Qualification of person in charge* complies with § 98.30-18 of this part;
( e ) *Supervision of person in charge* complies with § 98.30-19 of this part;
( f ) *Transfers, general,* comply with § 98.30-23 of this part;
( g ) *Connections* comply with § 98.30-27 of this part;
( h ) Pumping of incompatible products complies with § 98.30-29 of this part;
( i ) Conditions for pumping comply with § 98.30-31 of this part; and
( j ) *Carriage of NLSs* complies with § 98.30-16 of this part.
[CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37412, Sept. 11, 1990; 55 FR 47477, Nov. 14, 1990; USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54788, Sept. 6, 2013]
#### Mary J. Butler, *Appellant, v.*Allen Bloomfield and others, *Respondents*.

Decree reversed so far as it affects Mary J. Butler, and petition dismissed as to her, with costs below and of this court against petitioners. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Bockes, J., not acting.
Exhibit 10.9

 

	

    	
626   305 5900 | Phone

 

626   305 0350 | Fax
    
	
 
    
	
111   W. Lemon Ave.
    
	
Monrovia,   CA 91016
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
www.xencor.com
    


 

November 18, 2010

 

Bruce Carter

 

Re:  Amendment No. 1 to Board Agreement

 

Dear Dr. Carter:

 

Reference is made to the letter agreement (the “Agreement”) dated September 23, 2009 between you and Xencor, Inc. (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

 

The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

 

1.                                      Service.  You will serve as Chairman of the Board pursuant to the terms of Section 1.1(b)(iv) of that certain Second Amended and Restated Voting, Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement dated October 12, 2007 by and among the Company and the Stockholders named therein, as amended (the “Voting Agreement”).  Your service will continue until your resignation or removal as Chairman or as a member of the Board.  You may resign as Chairman or as a member of the Board at any time, and you may be removed (with or without cause) as Chairman of the Board at any time by action of the Board or as a member of the Board by the holders of a majority of the Common Stock then outstanding in accordance with Section 1.1(b)(iv) of the Voting Agreement.

 

2.                                      The first sentence of Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

 

For so long as you continue to serve as Chairman, the Company will pay you an annual cash retainer of $50,000, payable monthly in arrears in accordance with the Company’s normal payment practices for each year of your service as a member of the Board.

 

1











 

3.                                      Except as amended above, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

If the foregoing is acceptable, please sign and return one copy to the undersigned at your earliest convenience.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Very   truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Bassil Dahiyat
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Bassil   Dahiyat, Ph.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Xencor, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed   to and Accepted:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Bruce Carter
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Bruce Carter
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated:
    	
18   Nov. 2010
*Wednesday, February 3, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

97-2211.

#### Tongren v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 95-656-GA-AIR. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., not participating.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1723

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the National Labor

Relations Board to assert jurisdiction in a labor dispute which occurs

on Johnston Atoll, an unincorporated territory of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the

National Labor Relations Board to assert jurisdiction

in a labor dispute which occurs on Johnston Atoll, an

unincorporated territory of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL LABOR RELA4 TIONS BOARD.

5 Paragraph (1) of section 14(c) of the National Labor

6 Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 164(c)(1)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking the period after ‘‘1959’’; and

8 (2) by inserting the following:
2

HR 1723 IH

1 ‘‘: Provided further, That the Board shall not decline to

2 assert jurisdiction over a labor dispute which occurs on

3 Johnston Atoll, an unicorporated territory of the United

4 States.’’.

Æ
§ 69.19 Remeasurement. ( a ) If a vessel that is already measured is to undergo a structural alteration, a change to its service, or if the use of its space is to be changed, a remeasurement may be required. For vessels measured under a Formal Measurement System, owners must report immediately to an authorized measurement organization any intent to structurally alter the vessel or to change its service or the use of its space. The measurement organization advises the owner if remeasurement is necessary. For all other vessels, owners must report the intent to structurally alter the vessel to Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC-4), for a remeasurement determination. Remeasurement is initiated by completing and submitting, where applicable, the appropriate application for measurement services. Spaces not affected by the alteration or change need not be remeasured.
( b ) Remeasurement must also be performed as follows: ( 1 ) When there is a perceived error in the application of this part, the vessel owner should contact the responsible measurement organization, or Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC-4), as appropriate. Remeasurement is performed to the extent necessary to verify and correct the error.
( 2 ) At the vessel owner's option, to reflect the latest tonnage measurement rules and associated interpretations under this part.
( c ) For vessels measured under a Formal Measurement System, if a remeasurement or adjustment of tonnage is required, the authorized measurement organization will issue a new tonnage certificate. For all other vessels, Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC-4) will take action, as appropriate.
( d ) A vessel of less than 79 feet in overall length measured under a Formal Measurement System may be remeasured at the owner's request under the Simplified Regulatory Measurement System.
[USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18719, Mar. 31, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.33-5 Portable tanks and IBCs authorized. ( a ) The cargoes authorized under § 98.33-3 may be transferred to and from portable tanks to which this subpart applies if the portable tanks have: ( 1 ) A minimum design pressure of 9 psig.
( 2 ) Pressure-relief devices that may be frangible pressure-relief devices (rupture disks), and that do not open at less than 3 psig.
( b ) The cargoes authorized under § 98.33-3 may be transferred to and from IBCs to which this subpart applies if the IBCs meet the requirements in § 98.30-6.
[CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37412, Sept. 11, 1990; 55 FR 47477, Nov. 14, 1990; USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54788, Sept. 6, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                      
                                                            
<ARTICLE>   5                                               
                                                            
<S>                             <C>                         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997  
<CASH>                                             475,236  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                      199,802 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,000  
<INVENTORY>                                        531,197  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,268,412  
<PP&E>                                              50,916  
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,415,735  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              470,467  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<COMMON>                                               394 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,415,735  
<SALES>                                          2,395,844  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,395,844  
<CGS>                                            1,611,975  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,611,975  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   846,212  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,975  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (55,325) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       (55,325) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .04 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04 
                                                            
                                                            

</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/28

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
#### ELEANOR VINCENT and MARY J. BELL, Appellants and Contestants, *v.*DAVID McMASTER, as Executor, etc., of HUGH S. DUNN, Deceased, Respondent and Proponent.

*Evidence*— the *declaration of an attorney who drew a will, made in order to induce a witness to sign it*— when *admissible on the hearing of an application for its*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon the verdict óf a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried. The trial was had upon the reversal by the General Term, of a decree of the surrogate of Westchester county, admitting to probate the last will and testament of Hugh S. Dunn, deceased. Upon the trial the court refused to allow one of the witnesses of the will, Dr. Crump, to testify as to a conversation had by him with Mr. Shiel, who drew the will, in a room adjoining the bedroom of the testator.

The court at General Term said: “ The conversation between Mr. Shiel and Dr. Crump was improperly excluded, although it did not take place in the presence of the alleged testator. The inquiry involved the capacity of the testator to make a will, which was denied, and the question whether the testator made the will without undue influence being exerted upon him. It appeared that the will was drawn and its formal execution directed by Mr. Shiel, who was an attorney. Dr. Crump was the physician in charge of the alleged testator, who died some five or six days thereafter. He at first declined to witness the will, Shiel thereupon called him out of the room, and told him that he only, by signing the will as a witness, attested the formal execution, and not the capacity of the alleged testator.

*99“ It was not a question of agency in Shiel to bind the deceased. It was a part of the transaction ; it was more. The will gave all the property, some $14,000, to McMaster, a stranger, and made him sole trustee. Assuming the testator to be capable to make a will 'and to have employed Shiel to prepare it, the case would be a clear one of agency to bind the deceased. This is the claim of the executor. The contestants do not claim this agency; they say the deceased was deprived of his reason. The inquiry is widened beyond mere agency — Shiel was an actor in the subject of inquiry. It was his declaration thus engaged, to a witness to the will, and it was a declaration made whereby he induced him to sign his name as a witness to the will that was rejected. It was rejected although the contestants avowed their ability and intention to prove that Shiel and McMaster were acting in concert, .and that Shiel was the agent of McMaster.” ,

• *Thomas H. Hartwell*and *S. Chittenden,*for the appellants.

■ *Martin J.*Keogh, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Parnard, P. J.;

Gilbert, J., concurred; Dyicman •T„ dissented.

Yerdict, judgment and motion- denying new trial reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States of America,

File No. 15-cr-20351

Plaintiff,

Hon. Sean F. Cox

Vs. United States District Judge

D-03 – HATEM ATAYA, MD,

Defendant.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF CO-COUNSEL

TO: The Clerk of the Court and

DOJ Trial Counsel Matthew C. Thuesen

Please enter my Appearance as Co-Counsel in behalf of D-03 – HATEM ATAYA, MD, in the 

above captioned mater.

BURDICK LAW, P.C.

By: /s/ James W. Burdick 

James W. Burdick (P-11397)

Counsel for JAVED AKHTAR

1760 South Telegraph Road, Suite 300

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0183

Ph: (248) 335-5000; Fax: (248) 253-9620

jwb@jwburdicklaw.com

Dated: July 12, 2015

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 70 Filed 07/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 167
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on July 12, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing Notice of 

Appearance of Co-Counsel with the Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Michigan, using the ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

DOJ Trial Counsel Matthew C. Thuesen, 

As well as to all other counsel of record.

Respectfully submitted,

BURDICK LAW, P.C.

By: /s/ James W. Burdick 

James W. Burdick (P-11397)

Attorney for Defendant Javed Akhtar

1760 South Telegraph Road, Suite 300

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0183

Ph: (248) 335-5000; Fax: (248) 253-9620

jwb@jwburdicklaw.com

Dated: July 12, 2015

C:\DATA FILES\W.P. DOCS\ATAYA, HETEM - FED CRIM - 2015\NOTICE OF APPEARANCE.DOCX

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 70 Filed 07/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 168
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

#### § 107.213 Judicial review.

A party to a proceeding under § 107.203(a) may seek review of a determination of the Chief Counsel by filing a petition, within 60 days after the determination becomes final, in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia or in the Court of Appeals for the United States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal place of business.

[71 FR 30068, May 25, 2006]