alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 128 (Thursday, July 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 36758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3239]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds--Terminations: 
Factory Mutual Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i>21482), Affiliated FM 
Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i>10014)

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 17 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificates 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named companies under 
31 U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds were 
terminated effective August 17, 2006. Federal bond-approving officials 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Department 
Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision to reflect this change.
    With respect to any bonds currently in force with these companies, 
bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration and need 
not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted from 
these companies, and bonds that are continuous in nature should not be 
renewed.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: June 22, 2007.
Rose M. Miller,
Acting Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service
[FR Doc. 07-3239 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending August 1, 2009

----

EnforcementAmerican Bancorporation, St. Paul, Minnesota, and American Bank of St. Paul  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.					-Announced, July 30, 2009 					Bank Hapoalim, B.M., Tel Aviv, Israel, and its Aventura, Florida, branch  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Atlanta and the Florida Office of Financial Regulation.					-Announced, July 28, 2009 					Buckeye Bancshares, Inc., Lorain, Ohio, and Buckeye Community Bank  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions.					-Announced, July 30, 2009 					Centennial Bankshares, Inc., Ogden, Utah  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, July 27, 2009 					The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., Montgomery, Alabama  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order against Colonial.					-Announced, July 27, 2009 					Middleburg Bank, Middleburg, Virginia  -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition against Ronnie A. Jenkins, a former vice president, loan officer, and institution-affiliated party of the bank.					-Announced, July 30, 2009 					Sunrise Bank, Cocoa Beach, Florida  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation.					-Announced, July 29, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $125 billion in 28-day credit on July 27, 2009.					-Announced, July 27, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulation Z (Truth in Lending)  -- final�amendments to revise the disclosure requirements for private education�loans consistent with provisions of the Higher Education Opportunity Act.					-Approved, July 27, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: August 6, 2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 9, 2010

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST REGION BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Mr. William Lee Hale and the William Lee Hale Trust, both of Bland, Virginia, acting in concert to retain control 20.86% of the voting shares of First Regions Bancshares, Inc., Richlands, Virginia. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                         | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF THE EASTERN SHORE, CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND | 904425  | 05/17/2010 | 08/30/2010     | S         | Small Bank 
|LOGAN B&TC, LOGAN, WEST VIRGINIA               | 164331  | 06/07/2010 | 09/21/2010     | S         | Small Bank 
|STELLARONE BK, CHRISTIANSBURG, VIRGINIA        | 1009420 | 04/12/2010 | 09/02/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 9, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50125 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JASON RAY MARMINO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-79-4

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jason Ray Marmino appeals his conviction by a jury of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict him and that the district court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of his prior wrongful acts under F ED . R. E VID . 404(b) because such evidence related onlyNo. 03-50125 -2- to his character and that its prejudicial effect substantially outweighed its probative value under F ED . R. E VID . 403. Marmino has not shown that the testimony regarding his prior involvement with activities related to the manufacture of methamphetamine was not probative on the issue of his intent to join the conspiracy or that the admission of this testimony was improperly prejudicial under Rule 403. See United States v. Beechum , 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence of Marmino’s prior wrongful acts. See United States v. Roberts , 619 F.2d 379, 383-84 (5th Cir. 1980) The jury reasonably could infer from the evidence of Marmino’s presence in the motel room, his actions during the weekend in question, his prior drug-related activities, and his prior associations with some of the co-conspirators that he knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. See United States v. Broussard , 80 F.3d 1030-32 (5th Cir. 1996). Thus, viewing the evidence and all inferences drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, the jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Marmino committed the charged offense. See id. Accordingly, Marmino’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Nam TaiElectronics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her and his knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: November 16, 2012
Release dates | 
    Full version (25 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 13, 2010

---





## Monetary and Financial Policy

|
|

## Personnel

|
|

## Enforcement

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

## 

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
§ 7.35 Sandy Hook, NJ to Cape May, NJ. ( a ) A line drawn from Shark River Inlet North Breakwater Light “2” to Shark River Inlet South Breakwater Light “1”.
( b ) A line drawn from Manasquan Inlet North Breakwater Light to Manasquan Inlet South Breakwater Light.
( c ) A line drawn along the submerged Barnegat Inlet North Breakwater to Barnegat Inlet North Breakwater Light “2”; thence to Barnegat Inlet Light “5”; thence along the submerged Barnegat Inlet South Breakwater to shore.
( d ) A line drawn from the seaward tangent of Long Beach Island to the seaward tangent of Pullen Island across Beach Haven and Little Egg Inlets.
( e ) A line drawn from the seaward tangent of Pullen Island to the seaward tangent of Brigantine Island across Brigantine Inlet.
( f ) A line drawn from the seaward extremity of Absecon Inlet North Jetty to Atlantic City Light.
( g ) A line drawn from the southernmost point of Longport at latitude 39°18.2′ N. longitude 74°32.2′ W. to the northeasternmost point of Ocean City at latitude 39°17.6′ N. longitude 74°33.1′ W. across Great Egg Harbor Inlet.
( h ) A line drawn parallel with the general trend of the seaward, highwater shoreline across Corson Inlet.
( i ) A line formed by the centerline of the Townsend Inlet Highway Bridge.
( j ) A line formed by the shoreline of Seven Mile Beach and Hereford Inlet Light.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-69,315-04

EX P ARTE BRANDON EARL CROCK ER, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 241-0571-20-B IN THE 241 DISTRICT COURT st F ROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uil t y to evading arr est and was sentenc ed to thirty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary beca use trial counsel, among other things, failed to investiga te, failed to hire expert witnesses, failed to challeng e hear say testimony , failed to introduce exculpatory statements, and failed to investiga te his competen cy d u e to a COVI D-19 infec tion. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent , 393 S.W .3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M .2

P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s cla im. I n developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f t he trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s p er formanc e was defic ient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s allege d defic ient perf

ormanc e. The trial c ourt may make a ny other finding s and conclusions that it de ems appropr iate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laims. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, o rders, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

25, 2023 Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), each of
the undersigned officers of GSI Commerce, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|March 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Rubin   
|               |  |     |  | Michael G. Rubin       
|               |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|               |  |    
|March 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael R. Conn    
|               |  |     |  | Michael R. Conn        
|               |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 11.122 Use of Federal funds.

Federal funds administered by a Federal department or agency may not be expended for research involving human subjects unless the requirements of this policy have been satisfied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 98

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 98.31-5 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each offshore supply vessel contracted for, or the keel of which was laid, before March 15, 1996, that is oceangoing as defined in 33 CFR 151.05(j) and that carries noxious liquid substances (NLSs) as defined in § 153.2 of this chapter in bulk, including carriage in portable tanks.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending May 8, 2010

----

Regulations and Policies            Term Deposit Facility (TDF) -- authorization of up to five small-value offerings of term deposits in coming months and of a basic structure for the small-value TDF offerings.            -Approved, May 7, 2010            Enforcement            AliKat Investments, Inc., Gurnee, Illinois, and Northside Community Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking.            -Announced, May 6, 2010                        Bank of Commerce Holdings, Inc., Sarasota, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.            -Announced, May 7, 2010                        Lake County Bank, St. Ignatius, Montana -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and the Montana Division of Banking and Financial Institutions.            -Announced, May 3, 2010                        Legacy Bancorp, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Legacy Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the State of Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, May 5, 2010                        The Northwestern Bank, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and the State of Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, May 4, 2010                        Paradise Bank, Boca Raton, Florida -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation.            -Announced, May 3, 2010                        The South Financial Group, Greenville, South Carolina -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.            -Announced, May 7, 2010                        Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, and its New York, New York, branch -- written agreement dated January 22, 2007, terminated May 6, 2010.            -Announced, May 6, 2010                        Tower Financial Corporation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, and Tower Bank & Trust Company -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, May 5, 2010            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand eligibility for commissary

benefits for persons qualified for certain retired pay but under age 60.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand eligibility

for commissary benefits for persons qualified for certain

retired pay but under age 60.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMMISSARY

4 BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN PERSONS.

5 Section 1064 of title 10, United States Code, is

6 amended by striking out ‘‘for 12 days each calendar year’’

7 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘on the same basis as a per8 son who is eligible for such retired pay’’.

Æ
#### § 1.80 Overview.

This subpart sets forth the key responsibilities of the Operating Administrations, and the delegations of authority from the Secretary of Transportation to the Administrators.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 121 (Monday, June 25, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 34975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3138]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 121 / Monday, June 25, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 34975]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2007-21 of June 1, 2007

                
Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem 
                Embassy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 
                1995 (Public Law 104-45) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that it is necessary to protect the national 
                security interests of the United States to suspend for 
                a period of 6 months the limitations set forth in 
                sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act. My Administration 
                remains committed to beginning the process of moving 
                our Embassy to Jerusalem.

                You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress, accompanied by a report 
                in accordance with section 7(a) of the Act, and to 
                publish the determination in the Federal Register.

                This suspension shall take effect after transmission of 
                this determination and report to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 1, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-3138
Filed 6-22-07; 9:57 am]
Billing code 4710-10