alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60209 Summary Calendar

HILTON DEWITT HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GLENN WHITE, in his official capacity as District Attorney of the Eighth Circuit district, and individually, ET AL., Defendants, GLENN WHITE, in his official capacity as District Attorney of the Eighth Circuit District, and individually, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-329-PS

- - - - - - - - - - November 25, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hilton Dewitt Holmes, Mississippi prisoner #79891, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights action on the grounds of prosecutorial immunity and claim preclusion. HolmesNo. 96-60209 - 2 - contends that Mississippi District Attorney Glenn White conspired to defraud him of his property in a state forfeiture proceeding, that the forfeiture was a violation of his right to protection from double jeopardy, and that White coerced him into pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit capital murder. Holmes has abandoned any claims against Forrest County and USF&G by failing to brief them. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Holmes asserts for the first time a violation of his right to protection against double jeopardy. Holmes has not shown error, plain or otherwise relating to his double-jeopardy claim. Robertson v. Plano City of Tex. , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995); see United States v. Ursery , 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2149 (1996)(civil forfeitures are not criminal and do not constitute "punishment”; the Government may bring a parallel criminal action and an in rem civil forfeiture proceeding without violating double jeopardy). We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find no error in the decision of the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the same reasons advanced by the district court. Holmes v. White , No. 2:95-CV-329-PS (S.D. Miss. Feb. 14, 1996).
AFFIRMED.No. 96-60209 - 3 -
§ 540.8 Denial, revocation, suspension, or modification. ( a ) Prior to the denial, revocation, suspension, or modification of a Certificate (Performance), the Commission shall notify the applicant of its intention to deny, revoke, suspend, or modify and shall include with the notice the reason(s) for such action. If the applicant, within 20 days after the receipt of such notice, requests a hearing to show that the evidence of financial responsibility filed with the Commission does meet the rules of this subpart, such hearing shall be granted by the Commission. Regardless of a hearing, a Certificate (Performance) shall become null and void upon cancellation or termination of the surety bond, evidence of insurance, guaranty, or escrow account.
( b ) A Certificate (Performance) may be denied, revoked, suspended, or modified for any of the following reasons: ( 1 ) Making any willfully false statement to the Commission in connection with an application for a Certificate (Performance);
( 2 ) Circumstances whereby the party does not qualify as financially responsible in accordance with the requirements of the Commission;
( 3 ) Failure to comply with or respond to lawful inquiries, requests for information, rules, regulations, or orders of the Commission pursuant to the rules of this subpart.
( c ) If the applicant, within 20 days after notice of the proposed denial, revocation, suspension, or modification under paragraph (b) of this section, requests a hearing to show that such denial, revocation, suspension, or modification should not take place, such hearing shall be granted by the Commission.
[49 FR 36313, Sept. 14, 1984, as amended at 78 FR 13278, Feb. 27, 2013]
§ 54.05-15 Weldment toughness tests—procedure qualifications. ( a ) Plate for which Charpy V-notch impact testing is required in the parent material and for which V-notch minima are specified must similarly have welding procedures qualified for toughness by Charpy V-notch testing. For these tests, the test plates must be oriented with their final rolling direction parallel to the weld axis (*i.e.,* so that transverse impact specimens result), and with the V-notch normal to the plate surface. The sample weld joint preparation must be the same as that used in production. The number of test specimens and the location of their notches must be as shown in Figure 1 to § 54.05-15(a) and as described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section. ( 1 ) Three specimens with the notch centered in the weld metal.
( 2 ) Three specimens with the notch centered on the fusion line between parent plate and weld. (The fusion line may be identified by etching the specimen with a mild reagent.)
( 3 ) Three specimens with the notch centered in the heat affected zone, 1 mm from the fusion line.
( 4 ) Same as paragraph (a)(3) of this section, but 3 mm from the fusion line.
( 5 ) Same as paragraph (a)(3) of this section, but 5 mm from the fusion line. Figure 1 to § 54.05-15(a)—Charpy V-Notch Specimen Removal Details
( b ) Plate materials for which Charpy V-notch minimums are not specified, or for which a Charpy V-notch correlation with NDT is not known, and which are themselves tested for toughness by the drop-weight procedure, must have welding procedures similarly qualified by the drop-weight test. For such qualifications, two drop-weight specimens are to be tested, with the notch positioned directly above and parallel to the centerline of the weld.
( c ) Piping welding toughness tests must be qualified, by making Charpy V-notch impact tests as prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) Materials which are specially approved based on toughness criteria or tests, other than those discussed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, must have welding procedures tested and qualified for toughness as deemed appropriate and necessary by the Commandant.
( e ) In the case of stainless steels, weld procedure toughness tests may be limited to weld metal only if this is all that is required by § 54.25-15.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 23, 2008

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                
|--------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION | 4c8* 4c8      | Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of Countrywide Financial Corporation, Calabasas, California, and thereby indirectly acquire 100% of the voting securities of Countrywide Bank, FSB, Alexandria, Virginia, and thereby engage in the business of operating a savings association. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2008 (April 1, 2008 - June 30, 2008)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.30-23 Requirements for transfer; general. No person may transfer a product to or from a portable tank or IBC unless— ( a ) The vessel's moorings are strong enough to hold in all expected conditions of surge, current, and weather and are long enough to allow adjustment for changes in draft, drift, and tide during the transfer operation;
( b ) Transfer hoses or loading arms are long enough to allow the vessel to move the limits of its mooring without placing strain on the hose, loading arm, or transfer piping system;
( c ) Each transfer hose is supported in a manner that prevents strain on its coupling;
( d ) Each part of the transfer system necessary to allow the flow of the product is lined up for the transfer;
( e ) Each transfer hose has no loose covers, kinks, bulges, soft spots, and no gouges, cuts, or slashes that penetrate the hose reinforcement;
( f ) Each coupling meets the requirements of § 98.30-27;
( g ) Each scupper or drain in a discharge containment system is closed;
( h ) The person in charge of the transfer operations on the transferring vessel or facility and the person in charge of the transfer operations on the receiving vessel or facility have held a conference, to ensure that each person in charge understands— ( 1 ) The identity of the product to be transferred;
( 2 ) The sequence of transfer operations;
( 3 ) The transfer rate;
( 4 ) The name or title and location of each person participating in the transfer operation;
( 5 ) Particulars of the transferring and receiving systems;
( 6 ) Critical stages of the transfer operations;
( 7 ) Federal, state, and local rules that apply to the transfer of dangerous articles and combustible liquids;
( 8 ) Emergency procedures;
( 9 ) Discharge containment procedures;
( 10 ) Discharge reporting procedures;
( 11 ) Watch or shift arrangement; and
( 12 ) Transfer shutdown procedures;
( i ) The person in charge of the transfer operations on the transferring vessel or facility and the person in charge of transfer operations on the receiving vessel or facility agree to begin the transfer operations; and
( j ) Each person in charge required in this subpart is present.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 8, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|HIGHLAND BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3          | Highland Bancshares, Saint Michael, Minnesota, to acquire 100 percent of Ridgedale State Bank, Minnetonka, Minnesota.                                            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/28/2007     
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | 12/28/2007    
|SECURITY NATIONAL BANK    | Member         | Security National Bank, Durand, Wisconsin, to be known as Security Financial Bank, Durand, Wisconsin, proposes to become a member of the Federal Reserve System. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not applicable
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

The National Eye Institute will host an Ocular Epidemiology Program Planning Panel Meeting to discuss research needs and opportunities in ocular epidemiology. The meeting will be open to the public.

The thoughts and input from this meeting will be given by the panel members individually and incorporated into a report that will be given to the National Eye Institute.

*Name of Panel:*                         Ocular Epidemiology Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 24-25, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To discuss the Ocular Epidemiology Research.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, (7400 Wisconsin Avenue), Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mr. Michael Davis, Associate Director for Science Policy and Legislation, National Eye Institute, Bldg. 31; Room 6A25, 31 Center Drive MSC 2510, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-4308.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Any interested person may file written comments with the panel by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 8, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2425  Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 16, 1995 (46), Para 46.9 Call in Committee]
[Page 395]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.46.9  call in committee

  Mr. BEUREUTER, Chairman, announced that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, finding itself without a quorum, directed 
the Members to record their presence by electronic device, and the 
following-named Members responded--
```
|   |   | /s/ Clark      Wilson                 |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Clark    Wilson                            |   |
|   |   | President and Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   |   | Principal Executive      Officer           |   |
|   |   | May 7,      2009                           |   |

|   |   | /s/ Cindy      Hammes       |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Cindy      Hammes                |   |
|   |   | Principal Financial      Officer |   |
|   |   | May 7,      2009                 |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations of Computer Network
Technology Corporation as of and for the nine months ending September 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         10,083 
<SECURITIES>                                   18,269 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                      704
<INVENTORY>                                    12,087 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               62,232       
<PP&E>                                         31,492      
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,765    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 81,042      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,020    
<BONDS>                                           747  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          223 
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,052       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   81,042         
<SALES>                                        46,042          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,253          
<CGS>                                          14,450          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,124          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,243<F1>       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 39       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (170)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (62)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (108)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (108) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.00) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.00) 
<FN>

<F1> Amount presented represents engineering and development expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending July 17, 2010

|Filer                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CITIZENS BANKSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Prior change in control notice filed by Mark Van Smith, Savannah, Georgia, to acquire up to an additional 7.2 percent of the outstanding shares of First Citizens Bankshares, and its subsidiary, First Citizens Bank, both of Glennville, Georgia. Total pro forma ownership will not exceed 20.6 percent. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                      | Not available
|Federal Register:               | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 90.10-9 Coast Guard District Commander.

This term means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant to command all Coast Guard activities within the officer's district, which include the inspection, enforcement, and administration of Subtitle II of Title 46, U.S. Code, Title 46 and Title 33 U.S. Code, and regulations issued under these statutes.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51205, Sept. 30, 1997]