alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. at December 31, 1997, and its statement of
income for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10K of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         846,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  333,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                   295,580
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      21,942,429
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,844,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,309,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,152,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,309,888
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,341,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  720,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,794
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,720,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,720,668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,720,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Henry Secker v. The State.

*No. 6747.*

*Decided April 23.*

Using Violent and Abusive Language, etc.—Evidence. — The information, based upon article 495a of the Penal Code, charged that the accused, on May 4, 1889, used concerning Mrs. F. C. Johnson the abusive language, “You dirty bitch!” By separate information the wife of the accused was charged with using concerning Mrs. F. C. Johnson, on the same day, the abusive language, “You dirty old slut!” On the trial the defendant offered his wife as a witness in his behalf, but upon the objection that she was charged in a separate information with the same offense she was rejected by the court as an incompetent witness. *Held,*error. The informations charged the same statutory offense, but not the same transaction.

Appeal from the County Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. JE. G. Bower, County Judge.

The opinion discloses the case. The penalty assessed against the appellant was a fine of ten dollars.

*W. T. Strange,*for appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged by information brought under article 495a, Penal Code, with using violent, abusive language of and concerning one Mrs. F. C. Johnson, calculated to provoke a breach of the peace. He was charged to have used towards her the language, “You dirty bitch,” and the offense was alleged to have been committed on the 4th day of May, 1889.

A similar information was separately filed against Mrs. Henry Seeker, wife of appellant, charging her with a like offense, also committed on the 4th day of May, 1889; but the language charged to have been .used by Mrs. Henry Secker towards Mrs. F. C. Johnson was “You dirty old slut.”

*480On the trial of this appellant he proposed to introduce his wife, Mrs.' Henry Seeker, as a witness in his behalf, when it was objected by the prosecution that she was an incompetent witness because she was under prosecution for the same offense, though by a different information. This objection was sustained by the court, and the witness Avas not allowed to-testify, to which ruling appellant duly saved a bill of exceptions. We are of opinion the court erred in the ruling. The offenses charged against the parties were not the same. The words charged against the parties were not identical, and there is nothing identifying the transactions as the same save the name of the injured party and the date of the alleged offenses. Though both parties are charged with the same statutory offense,, they are, not charged with the same transaction.

Judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



Certification of President



I, Wm. Lee Popham, President, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Admiral Financial Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: September 12, 2011



/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham, President
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending August 15, 2009

|Filer                                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|WARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P. | CIC           | Notice pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978 by Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P., and Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P., and their controlling affiliates, with respect to an additional investment in Webster Financial Corporation. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                            | Not available
|Federal Register:                     | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
First Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
  

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of February 1, 2005, by and between NATURAL ALTERNATIVES
INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as
of May 1, 2004, as amended from time to time (“Credit Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section 5.2. is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following substituted therefor: 
  
 “SECTION 5.2. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. Make any additional investment in fixed assets in excess of an
aggregate of $8,000,000.00 for fiscal year 2005.” 
  
 2.
Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this
Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document. 
  
 3. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there
exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would constitute any such Event of Default. 
  

 -1- 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year
first written above. 
  

							
	 	 	 WELLS FARGO BANK,

	 NATURAL ALTERNATIVES
 INTERNATIONAL,
INC.
	 	    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Randy Weaver

	 	By:	 	 /s/ Bernie Palmer


	Title:	 	PRESIDENT	 	 	 	 Bernie Palmer
 Vice President

				
	By:	 	 /s/ John Reaves

	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	CFO	 	 	 	 

  

 -2-
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 134 (Friday, July 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38600-38601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the 
Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of 
the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-67776, dated 
October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as 
amended most recently at 72 FR 35491-35492, dated June 28, 2007) is 
amended to reflect the establishment of the Extramural Research Program 
Office within the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and 
Health Promotion, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
    Section C-B, Organization and Functions, is hereby amended as 
follows: After the functional statement for the Program Services Branch 
(CUC13), Office of the Director (CUC1), National Center for Chronic 
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (CUC), insert the following:
    Extramural Research Program Office (CUC18). The Extramural Research 
Program Office (ERPO) plans, develops,

[[Page 38601]]

coordinates, and evaluates extramural research activities in 
cooperation with centers, divisions, and offices within the 
Coordinating Center for Health Promotion. In carrying out its mission, 
the ERPO: (1) Coordinates, monitors, and directs the extramural 
research program which is designed to address center priorities; (2) 
provides scientific leadership in the processes supporting extramural 
research of the center; (3) works with National Centers to prepare and 
promote initiatives to stimulate extramural research in relevant 
priority areas; (4) coordinates and conducts in-depth external peer 
review and secondary program relevance review of extramural research 
applications by use of consultant expert panels; (5) makes 
recommendations to the center directors on award selections on the 
basis of secondary reviews; (6) staff members serve as the program 
officials and work with CDC grants management officers, and the 
Procurement and Grants Office to implement and monitor the scientific, 
technical, and administrative aspects of awards; (7) facilitates 
scientific collaborations between external and internal investigators; 
(8) evaluates extramural research progress and impact and disseminates 
findings; and (9) assists Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, in 
developing extramural research policies and oversees the implementation 
of those policies within the center.

    Dated: June 28, 2007.
William H. Gimson,
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC).
[FR Doc. 07-3427 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
#### § 97.95-1 General.

A qualified person in charge of a transfer of liquid cargo in bulk shall be designated in accordance with subpart C of 33 CFR part 155.

[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17157, Apr. 4, 1995]
§ 71.20-10 Plans. ( a ) Before application for inspection is made and before construction is started, the owner or builder shall have plans indicating the proposed arrangement and construction of the vessel approved by the Commandant. The procedure for submitting plans and the list of plans to be supplied is set forth in subpart 71.65.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 1004.2 Misrouting, adjustment of claims.

Carriers should adjust claims for damages resulting from misrouting. Where a carrier admits responsibility for billing, forwarding, or diverting a shipment over a higher rated route than that directed by the shipper or otherwise available, the misrouting carrier should refund the difference to the shipper (or reimburse the delivering carrier, as the case may be). Where the misrouting carrier alleges justification for using the higher rated route, the Board may, at its discretion and upon appropriate petition, determine or express an advisory opinion on the lawfulness of such routing. This interpretation must not be used to evade or defeat tariff rates or to meet the rate of a competing carrier or route, nor to relieve a shipper from responsibility for routing instruction. Damages caused by misrouting are not overcharges.
##### 



Exhibit 10.3.1
 AMENDMENT TO  CONSULTING AGREEMENT
 THIS AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT Amendment th INTERSTATE
BAKERIES CORPORATION, INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION AND INTERSTATE BRANDS WEST CORPORATION Companies CHARLES A. SULLIVAN Sullivan
 WHEREAS Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 VII. Compensation
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ James R. ElsesserJames R. ElsesserChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ James R. ElsesserJames R. ElsesserChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Charles A. SullivanCharles A. Sullivan, an Individual
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  J OE L EWIS B ROWN ,

Petitioner-Appellant,
v. No. 01-7951



# 
R ONALD J. A NGELONE ,

Respondent-Appellee. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge.

(CA-01-778) Submitted: March 13, 2002 Decided: February 10, 2003 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Joe Lewis Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:Joe Lewis Brown appeals the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely because it was filed beyond the one-year limitation period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (2000). Because the district court sua sponte dismissed Brown’s § 2254 petition as untimely without affording him notice or an opportunity to be heard and because it is not indisputably clear from the district court record that the petition is untimely and cannot be salvaged by equitable tolling principles or any of the circumstances enumerated in § 2244(d)(1), we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s order, and remand to the district court for additional proceedings consistent with Hill v. Braxton , 277 F.3d 701 (4th Cir. 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED 2 B ROWN v. A NGELONE
```

[House Report 107-87]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-87

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

June 5, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 156]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 156, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides that the following bills and 
resolutions may be considered under suspension of the rules at 
any time on the legislative day of Wednesday, June 6, 2001:
    (1) The bill (H.R. 1000) to adjust the boundary of the 
William Howard Taft National Historic Site in the State of 
Ohio, to authorize an exchange of land in connection with the 
historic site, and for other purposes;
    (2) The bill (H.R. 37) to amend the National Trails System 
Act to update the feasibility and suitability studies of 4 
national historic trails and provide for possible additions to 
such trails;
    (3) The bill (H.R. 640) to adjust the boundaries of Santa 
Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, and for other 
purposes;
    (4) The bill (H.R. 1661) to extend indefinitely the 
authority of the States of Washington, Oregon, and California 
to manage a Dungeness crab fishery until the effective date of 
a fishery management plan for the fishery under the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act;
    (5) The bill (H.R. 1209) to amend the Immigration and 
Nationality Act to determine whether an alien is a child, for 
purposes of classification as an immediate relative, based on 
the age of the alien on the date the classification petition 
with respect to the alien is filed, and for other purposes;
    (6) The bill (H.R. 1914) to extend for 4 additional months 
the period for which chapter 12 of title 11 of the United 
States Code is reenacted; and
    (7) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 150) expressing 
the sense of Congress that Erik Weihenmayer's achievement of 
becoming the first blind person to climb Mount Everest 
demonstrates the abilities and potential of all blind people 
and other individuals with disabilities.

                                  

```