alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1721

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for programs regarding

ovarian cancer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for

programs regarding ovarian cancer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ovarian Cancer

5 Research and Information Amendments of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH ON OVARIAN CANCER.

7 Section 417B(b)(2) of the Public Health Service Act,

8 as added by section 403 of Public Law 103–43, is

9 amended—
2

HR 1721 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘CANCERS.—For the purpose

2 of’’ and all that follows through ‘‘417,’’ and insert3 ing the following: ‘‘CANCERS.—

4 ‘‘(A) For the purpose of carrying out sec5 tion 417(d),’’; and

6 (2) by adding at the end the following subpara7 graph:

8 ‘‘(B)(i) For the purpose of carrying out re9 search under section 417(d) on ovarian cancer,

10 there are authorized to be appropriated

11 $90,000,000 for fiscal year 1996, and such

12 sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal

13 years 1997 and 1998. With respect to such pur14 pose, such authorizations of appropriations are

15 in addition to the authorizations of appropria16 tions established in subparagraph (A) and in

17 subsection (a).

18 ‘‘(ii) Of the amounts appropriated under

19 clause (i), the Director of the Institute shall re20 serve 50 percent for research described in such

21 clause that does not involve treatment or clini22 cal trials, and 50 percent for research described

23 in such clause that does involve treatment and

24 clinical trials.
3

HR 1721 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) In expending the amounts reserved

2 under clause (ii), the Director of the Institute

3 shall ensure that 1 or more programs of re4 search on ovarian cancer are carried out under

5 the programs designated by the Director as the

6 Specialized Programs of Research Excellence.’’.

7 SEC. 3. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ON OVAR8 IAN CANCER.

9 Section 417(d)(4) of the Public Health Service Act,

10 as added by section 401 of Public Law 103–43, is amend11 ed by striking ‘‘section 413; and’’ and inserting the follow12 ing: ‘‘section 413, which programs shall include programs

13 on ovarian cancer that (subject to changes in the applica14 ble facts) provide information and education regarding—

15 ‘‘(A) screening procedures for such cancer,

16 including the fact that there is not a procedure

17 that reliably provides for the early detection of

18 such cancer;

19 ‘‘(B) the fact that there may be a genetic

20 basis to such cancer;

21 ‘‘(C) factors indicating a substantial risk

22 of such cancer; and

23 ‘‘(D) the various treatments for such can24 cer and the extent to which the treatments are

25 effective; and’’.
4

HR 1721 IH

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act takes effect October 1, 1995, or upon the

3 date of the enactment of this Act, whichever occurs later.

Æ
Exhibit  32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the quarterly report
of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and


2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
November 14. 2010





By
              /s/ L.S. Smith.L.S.
      Smith, Chairman of the Board,Chief
      Executive Officer and
Secretary





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### § 69.211 Treatment of novel type vessels.

Refer questions regarding the application of the tonnage measurement rules under this subpart to novel type vessels to the Commandant.

[USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18734, Mar. 31, 2016]
98-473.

#### BSW Dev. Group v. Dayton.

Montgomery App. No. 15186. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 338, 699 N.E.2d 1271. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1759 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1759

 To ensure that any person who served aboard the vessel HMT Queen Mary 
and who was awarded the American Theater Campaign Ribbon for service in 
World War II is able to obtain a replacement for that ribbon if it has 
            been lost, destroyed, or rendered unfit for use.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1995

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that any person who served aboard the vessel HMT Queen Mary 
and who was awarded the American Theater Campaign Ribbon for service in 
World War II is able to obtain a replacement for that ribbon if it has 
            been lost, destroyed, or rendered unfit for use.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN AMERICAN THEATER CAMPAIGN RIBBONS.

    (a) Replacement Ribbons.--The Secretary of the Army, pursuant to 
section 3751 of title 10, United States Code, may replace any World War 
II decoration known as the American Theater Campaign Ribbon that was 
awarded to a person listed in the order described in subsection (b).
     (b) Ribbons Properly Awarded.--Any person listed in the document 
titled ``General Order Number 1'', issued by the Third Auxiliary 
Surgical Group, APO 647, United States Army, dated February 1, 1943, 
shall be considered to have been properly awarded the American Theater 
Campaign Ribbon for service during World War II.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1.101 Delegations to the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Administrator. The Administrator of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation is delegated authority to: ( a ) Carry out the functions vested in the Secretary by sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of section 2 of the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471) [33 U.S.C. 1223-1225, 1227, and 1231-1232] as they relate to the operation of the Saint Lawrence Seaway.
( b ) Carry out the functions vested in the Secretary by section 5 and section 8(a) of the International Bridge Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-434, 86 Stat. 731) [33 U.S.C. 535c and 535e(a)] as it relates to the Saint Lawrence River.
( c ) Carry out the functions vested in the Secretary by section 3(d) of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships [33 U.S.C. 1902e] as it relates to ships owned or operated by the Corporation when engaged in noncommercial service.
The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2471

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Northern District of Iowa.

Craig Freisinger, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 2, 1998

 Filed: October 15, 1998 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Craig Freisinger appeals the sentence the district court imposed on him after

1

revoking his supervised release, on the basis that his sentence exceeds the suggested

range of imprisonment calculated by the court under U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES

MANUAL § 7B1.4(a), p.s. (1997).
-2-

We reject Freisinger’s challenge. The Chapter 7 policy statements are “merely

advisory,” the sentence does not exceed the limit imposed by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3),

and the district court properly considered Freisinger’s need for drug treatment. See

Unites States v. Carr, 66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); United States v.

Jones, 973 F.2d 605, 607 (8th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 24, 2011

|Filer                          | Filing Type                      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------ | -------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|CHEVIOT MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY | * SLHC Formation* MHC Conversion | Cheviot Mutual Company, Cheviot, Ohio proposes to convert to stock form and merge with Cheviot Financial Corp.,Cheviot, Ohio, which proposes to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Cheviot Savings Bank, Cheviot, Ohio | Newspaper:10/15/2011Federal Register:10/17/2011    
|Newspaper:                     | 10/15/2011                      
|Federal Register:              | 10/17/2011                      
|CROGHAN COLONIAL BANK, THE     | * 18C                            | Application by The Croghan Colonial Bank, Fremont, Ohio, to purchase and assume certain assets and liabilities of four branch offices of The Home Savings and Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio                                                            | Newspaper:10/14/2011Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | 10/14/2011                      
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable                  

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 13, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending September 6, 2008

----

Banks, ForeignChina Investment Corporation and Central SAFE Investments Limited, Beijing, People's Republic of  China  -- requests for exemptions from the requirements of the Bank Holding Company Act.					-Granted, August 4, 2008 					(AC)

EnforcementSunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia  -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition against Roslyn Y. Terry, a former employee and institution-affiliated party.					-Announced, September 4, 2008 					

PersonnelDivision of Information Technology  -- appointment of Glenn S. Eskow as assistant director.					-Announced, September 2, 2008 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: September 11, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 110
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 70 FR 56090, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 110.50 Disbursement of grant funds. ( a ) *Pre-award costs.* ( 1 ) PHMSA expects the recipient to be fully aware that pre-award costs result in borrowing against future support and that such borrowing must not impair the recipient's ability to accomplish the activities in the approved period of performance.
( 2 ) A recipient may, at its own risk, incur pre-award costs to cover costs up to 90 days before the beginning date of the initial period of performance.
( 3 ) The incurrence of pre-award costs in anticipation of a competitive or non-competitive grant imposes no obligation on PHMSA under any circumstances, including in the event of: ( i ) The absence of appropriations;
( ii ) A grant is not subsequently being made; or
( iii ) A grant being made for a lesser amount than the recipient anticipated.
( b ) Payments may not be made for activities not approved in the grant agreement. If a recipient seeks additional grant funds, the supplemental amendment request will be evaluated on the basis of needs, performance, and availability of grant funds. An existing grant is not a commitment of future funding.
[84 FR 4000, Feb. 14, 2019]
#### Towle *v.*Lawrence.

In an action for damages for withholding property from, or not conveying property to, the plaintiff, a tender of the property or part of it, or a conveyance of it or part of it, to the plaintiff, may be allowed at the trial in mitigation of damages, when such a course is reasonable.

Case, for deceit in a sale of land conveyed by the defendant to the plaintiff. In the negotiation, the easterly line of the land was incorrectly pointed out by the defendant, whose land did not extend so far east, by a few inches, as the line he pointed out. It was claimed by the plaintiff that the defendant’s erroneous representation of the location of the line was fraudulent, and by the defendant, that it was not fraudulent; that he believed the line was where he said it was. During the trial, the defendant offered, in mitigation of damages, his deed to the plaintiff of a part of the land for non-conveyance of which the suit was brought. The plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show that the proffered deed would convey nothing, because the defendant had not the title. The court excluded the deed, and the defendant excepted. Verdict for the plaintiff.

Hatch, for the defendant.

*Marston Hastman*and Prink, for the plaintiff.

Doe, C. J.

The deed could have been received in mitigation of damages, and deposited with the clerk for the plaintiff on his refusal to accept it, if such a course would have been reasonable. *Colby*v. Reed, 99 U. S. 560, 566. If the defendant had acquired title to the strip of land a few inches wide, or a part of it, it might be of no value to him, and of great value to the plaintiff: and the plaintiff could not justly compel the defendant to pay full damages, and suffer a great and irreparable loss, which could be obviated by *502a conveyance of his title to the plaintiff in mitigation of damages. But the facts were such that the court found it unreasonable to allow the proposed conveyance.

*Judgment on the*verdict.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 1.46 Office of Public Affairs.

The Director of Public Affairs is the principal advisor to the Secretary and Secretarial Officers on public affairs issues and the final authority on public affairs issues within the Department. The Office of Public Affairs prepares news releases and supporting media materials, and maintains a new media presence. The Office also provides information to the Secretary on opinions and reactions of the public and news media on programs and transportation issues. The Office of Public Affairs is responsible for the supervision, coordination, and review of the activities of the public affairs offices within the Operating Administrations. The Director of Public Affairs participates with each Administrator in the hiring decisions (other than in the Federal Aviation Administration) and performance reviews of all of the Operating Administrations' Directors of Public Affairs.

[82 FR 19193, Apr. 26, 2017]
§ 58.30-15 Pipe, tubing, valves, fittings, pumps, and motors. ( a ) The requirements of this section are applicable to those hydraulic and pneumatic systems listed in § 58.30-1.
( b ) Materials used in the manufacture of tubing, pipes, valves, flanges, and fittings must be selected from those specifications that appear in table 1 to § 56.60-1 or table 1 to § 56.60-2; or they may be selected from the material specifications of Section I or Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (both incorporated by reference; see § 58.03-1). Materials designated by other specifications must be evaluated on the basis of physical and chemical properties. To assure these properties, the specifications must specify and require such physical and chemical testing as considered necessary by the Commandant. All tubing and pipe materials must be suitable for handling the hydraulic fluid used and must be of such chemical and physical properties as to remain ductile at the lowest operating temperature.
( c ) Bolting must meet the requirements of § 56.25-20 of this subchapter except that regular hexagon bolts conforming to SAE J429, grades 2 through 8 (incorporated by reference, see § 58.03-1), or ASTM A193 (incorporated by reference, see § 58.03-1) may be used in sizes not exceeding 1.5 inches.
( d ) The maximum allowable working pressure and minimum thickness must be calculated as required by § 56.07-10(e) of this subchapter.
( e ) All flared, flareless and compression type joints must be in accordance with § 56.30-25 of this subchapter.
( f ) Fluid power motors and pumps installed on vessels subject to inspection must be certified by the manufacturer as suitable for the intended use. Such suitability must be demonstrated by operational tests conducted aboard the vessel which must be witnessed by a marine inspector.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 8/7 /14 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013

- 0602 FROM: Michael Gordon , EPA Region 3 SUBJECT: 8/7/14 Meeting with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection

and Division of Energy Regarding Proposed C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and the West Virginia Division of Energy on August 7 , 2014 to d iscuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.
**ATTENDEES** Erika Wilson , Office of Atmospheric Programs Denise Mulholland , Office of Atmospheric Programs Kevin Culligan , Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Erich Eschmann , Office of Atmospheric Programs Lora Strine, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Lisa Connor, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Nathan Topham , Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emily L inn , Air Protection Division Mike Gordon, Air Protection Division Matt Clouse , Office of Atmospheric Programs Chris Sherry , Office of Atmospheric Programs David Solomon , Office of Air Qualit y Planning and Standards Joe Bry son , Office of Atmospheric Programs Fred Durham, WVDEP James Mason, WVDEP Laura Crowder, WVDEP Renu Chakrabarty , WVDEP Scott Driver, WVDEP Casey Randolph, WVDOE
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries as of March 3, 2008
 Subsidiary Name
    
    Place of Incorporation
    
    Percent Ownership1075 First Global Associates, LLC
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    100%7601 Trade Port Drive, LLC
    
    Kentucky
    
    100%935 HQ Associates, LLC
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    100%935 KOP Associates, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    100%ASFD, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%E-Dialog UK Limited
    
    England and Wales
    
    100%E-Dialog, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%GSI Commerce Call Center, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    100%GSI Commerce Solutions International, S.L.
    
    Spain
    
    100%GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc.
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    100%GSI Commerce South, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%GSI Equipment, Inc.
    
    New York
    
    100%GSI Legacy Holdings, Inc.
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    100%GSI Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    Luxembourg
    
    100%Online Direct, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%Promotions Distributor Services Corporation
    
    California
    
    100%Zendor/GSI Commerce Limited
    
    England and Wales
    
    100%