alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1464

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the Postal Service to

accept a change-of-address order from a commercial mail receiving agency

and to forward mail to the new address.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the Postal

Service to accept a change-of-address order from a commercial mail receiving agency and to forward mail to

the new address.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHANGE-OF-ADDRESS ORDER BY COMMERCIAL

4 MAIL RECEIVING AGENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 36 of title 39, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing:
2

•HR 1464 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3686. Change-of-address order by commercial mail

2 receiving agency

3 ‘‘Upon termination of an agency relationship between

4 an addressee and a commercial mail receiving agency, ei5 ther the addressee or the commercial mail receiving agency

6 may file a change-of-address order with the Postal Service.

7 The Postal Service shall forward to such addressee mail

8 which is marked for forwarding by the commercial mail

9 receiving agency in the same manner as, and subject to

10 the same terms and conditions as apply to, mail forwarded

11 directly by the Postal Service to such addressee.’’.

12 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents at

13 the beginning of chapter 36 of title 39, United States

14 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

15 section 3685 the following new item:

‘‘3686. Change-of-address order by commercial mail receiving agency.’’.

Æ
§ 42.09-50 Repairs or alterations to vessel after it has been surveyed. ( a ) After any survey of the vessel made under §§ 42.09-25 to 42.09-40, inclusive, as applicable, has been completed and deficiencies corrected as provided in § 42.09-45, no change shall be made in the vessel's structure, equipment, arrangement, material, or scantlings as covered by such survey, without the prior specific approval of the assigning and issuing authority.
( b ) To avoid a freeboard or other penalty, any vessel which undergoes repairs, alterations, or modifications, including outfitting related thereto, shall continue to comply with the applicable requirements consistent with the load line certificate held.
( c ) An existing vessel, which had a load line assigned under previous regulations which undergoes repairs, alterations, or modifications of a major character, shall meet the requirements for a new vessel in this part insofar as the assigning and issuing authority and the Commandant deem reasonable and practicable.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10057, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGD 80-120, 47 FR 5723, Feb. 8, 1982]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLORIA CRUZ RAUNO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70712

Agency No. A073-929-876

MEMORANDUM*

GLORIA CRUZ RAUNO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72238

Agency No. A073-929-876

GLORIA CRUZ RAUNO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

No. 07-72943

Agency No. A073-929-876

FILED

MAR 03 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 18, 2011

Pasadena, California

Before: ALARCÓN, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Gloria Cruz Rauno, a native and citizen of Guatemala, appeals a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture from

Guatemala. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and grant the petition.

Although deference is due to the agency’s credibility determinations, see

Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1041-42 (9th Cir. 2010), in this case the IJ’s

adverse credibility finding, which the BIA did not disturb, is not supported by

substantial evidence. With one exception, the inconsistencies identified are simply

not inconsistencies at all. Ruano’s statement at the border does differ from her

later statement to the asylum officer and IJ, but it cannot carry the day. See Singh

v. INS, 292 F.3d 1017, 1022-24 (9th Cir. 2002). The merits of Ruano’s application

are not before us, nor did the BIA rule on the merits. Therefore, we remand so that
the BIA may determine in the first instance Rauno’s eligibility for relief in light of

her credible testimony. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16 (2002) (per curiam).

GRANTED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 11, 2010

|Filer                            | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF TEXAS                    | Member         | Bank of Texas, Midland, Texas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                                                        | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                       | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable
|FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. | * 3A3          | First Financial Bankshares, Inc., Abilene, Texas, to acquire 100 percent of Sam Houston Financial Corp., Huntsville, Texas, and indirectly acquire First State Bank, Huntsville, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/11/2010     
|Newspaper:                       | Not available 
|Federal Register:                | 10/11/2010    
|STEELE HOLDINGS, INC.            | * 3A1          | Steele Holdings, Inc., Tyler, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of American State Bank, Arp, Texas.                                                      | Newspaper:09/13/2010Federal Register:09/16/2010        
|Newspaper:                       | 09/13/2010    
|Federal Register:                | 09/16/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 95.05-15 Hand portable fire extinguishers and semiportable fire extinguishing systems. ( a ) Approved hand portable fire extinguishers and semiportable fire extinguishing systems shall be installed on all vessels, other than unmanned barges and fishing vessels, as set forth in subpart 95.50.
Editorial Note on Part 515
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 515 appear at 67 FR 39860, June 11, 2002, and 70 FR 7669, Feb. 15, 2005.

§ 515.21 Financial responsibility requirements. ( a ) *Form and amount.* Except as otherwise provided in this part, no person may advertise, hold oneself out, or act as an ocean transportation intermediary unless that person furnishes a bond, proof of insurance, or other surety in a form and amount determined by the Commission to insure financial responsibility. The bond, insurance, or other surety covers the transportation-related activities of an ocean transportation intermediary. ( 1 ) Any person in the United States advertising, holding oneself out, or acting as an ocean freight forwarder as defined in § 515.2(m)(1) shall furnish evidence of financial responsibility in the amount of $50,000.
( 2 ) Any person in the United States advertising, holding oneself out, or acting as an NVOCC as defined in § 515.2(m)(2) shall furnish evidence of financial responsibility in the amount of $75,000.
( 3 ) Any registered NVOCC, as defined in § 515.2(r), shall furnish evidence of financial responsibility in the amount of $150,000. Such registered NVOCC shall be strictly responsible for the acts and omissions of its employees and agents, wherever they are located.
( b ) *Group financial responsibility.* When a group or association of ocean transportation intermediaries accepts liability for an ocean transportation intermediary's financial responsibility for such ocean transportation intermediary's transportation-related activities under the Act, the group or association of ocean transportation intermediaries shall file a group bond form, insurance form or guaranty form, clearly identifying each ocean transportation intermediary covered, before a covered ocean transportation intermediary may provide ocean transportation intermediary services. In such cases, a group or association must establish financial responsibility in an amount equal to the lesser of the amount required by paragraph (a) of this section for each member, or $3,000,000 in aggregate. A group or association of ocean transportation intermediaries may also file an optional bond rider as provided in § 515.25(b).
( c ) *Common trade name.* Where more than one person operates under a common trade name, separate proof of financial responsibility is required covering each corporation or person separately providing ocean transportation intermediary services.
( d ) *Federal military and civilian household goods.* Any person which exclusively transports used household goods and personal effects for the account of the Department of Defense, or for the account of the federal civilian executive agencies shipping under the International Household Goods Program administered by the General Services Administration, or both, is not subject to the requirements of subpart C of this part, but may be subject to other requirements, such as alternative surety bonding, imposed by the Department of Defense, or the General Services Administration.
[64 FR 11171, Mar. 8, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 17945, Apr. 6, 2004; 80 FR 68735, Nov. 5, 2015; 85 FR 9683, Feb. 20, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 121 (Monday, June 25, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 34977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3139]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 121 / Monday, June 25, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 34977]]


                Memorandum of June 12, 2007

                
Assignment of Certain Reporting Functions of the 
                John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 2007

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] Secretary of 
                Defense[, and the] Director of National Intelligence

                By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby assign to the Secretary of State the functions 
                of the President under sections 1211(b), 1213(b), and 
                1226(c) of the John Warner National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-
                364).

                In the performance of such functions, the Secretary of 
                State should coordinate with the Secretary of Defense 
                and the Director of National Intelligence, and the 
                heads of other departments and agencies, as 
                appropriate.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 12, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-3139
Filed 6-22-07; 9:57 am]
Billing code 4710-10
§ 67.217 Termination of filing and disposition of instruments. ( a ) The filing of an instrument is subject to termination if: ( 1 ) It is determined that the instrument cannot be recorded because the instrument itself is not in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations in this part;
( 2 ) The filing was not made in compliance with the requirements of § 67.213;
( 3 ) The Application for Initial Issue, Exchange, or Replacement of Certificate of Documentation; or Redocumentation (form CG-1258) submitted with the instrument(s) was not made in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations of this part;
( 4 ) The owner of the vessel submits an Application, Consent, and Approval for Withdrawal of Application for Documentation or Exchange of Certificate of Documentation (form CG-4593), with mortgagee consent, if applicable; or
( 5 ) Another instrument is filed evidencing satisfaction or release of the subject instrument and the subject instrument is one described in subpart Q of this part.
( b ) Ninety days prior to terminating the filing pursuant to a reason listed in paragraphs (a) (1), (2), or (3) of this section, the National Vessel Documentation Center will send written notice detailing the reasons the filing is subject to termination to the following person(s) and any agent known to be acting on behalf of the same: ( 1 ) The applicant for documentation, if a bill of sale, instrument in the nature of a bill of sale, or a deed of gift;
( 2 ) The mortgagee or assignee, if a mortgage or assignment or amendment thereof;
( 3 ) The claimant, if a notice of claim of lien; or
( 4 ) The lender first named in an interlender agreement affecting a mortgage, preferred mortgage, or related instrument.
( c ) If the reason(s) which subject the filing to termination remain uncorrected for a period of 90 days after the notice described in paragraph (b) of this section is sent, or upon receipt of the request for withdrawal described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, or satisfaction or release as described in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the instrument will be returned to either: ( 1 ) The applicant for documentation, if a bill of sale, instrument in the nature of a bill of sale, or a deed of gift;
( 2 ) The mortgagee or assignee, if a mortgage or assignment or amendment thereof;
( 3 ) The claimant, if a notice of claim of lien;
( 4 ) The lender first named in an interlender agreement affecting a mortgage, preferred mortgage, or related instrument; or
( 5 ) An agent for any appropriate party, provided that the agent has filed with the Coast Guard a writing bearing the original signature of the appropriate party(ies) clearly identifying the instrument(s) being returned and stating that the instrument(s) may be returned to the agent.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31605, June 15, 1995]
§ 72.05-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart apply to the following vessels: ( 1 ) All vessels of 100 gross tons or more.
( 2 ) All vessels with overnight accommodations for more than 150 passengers.
( 3 ) All vessels on an international voyage.
( b ) The provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 72.05-90, apply to all vessels noted in paragraph (a) of this section contracted for on or after May 26, 1965. Such vessels contracted for prior to May 26, 1965, must meet the requirements of § 72.05-90.
( c ) Vessels meeting the structural fire protection requirements of SOLAS, Chapter II-2, Regulations 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11 (incorporated by reference, see § 72.01-2), when combined with the stair requirements in § 72.05-20 may be considered equivalent to the provisions of this subpart.
( d ) Vessels regulated under subchapter K of this chapter which carry more than 600 passengers or with overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers must also meet the requirements for stairways, ladders and elevators in § 72.05-20 (see 46 CFR 116.438(a)).
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48252, July 22, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the filing of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter  Ended March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  by American  Medical  Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


                                                   /s/ Howard M. Siegel
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Howard M. Siegel
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  American  Medical  Alert  Corp.  and will be  retained by American
Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
NO. AP-76,051 MANUEL VELEZ § IN THE VS. § COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS STATE OF TEXAS § STATE OF TEXAS AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on N ovember 5, 2015, a copy of the State's motion to publish was served on : Rene Gonzalez, Assistant District Attorn ey, Cameron County, by e-service or email <rgonzalez1@co.cameron.tx.us>; Brian W. Stull, Attorney for Manuel Velez, by first class mail, return receipt requested # 7013 0600 0002 2111 7188, 201 W. Main St , Ste 402, Durham, N.C. 27701-3228; Mr. Stephen Doggett, Attorney for Louis Carlos Rodriguez, by e-service or email < office@doggett-law.com>; Ms. Lisa McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney, by e-service or email, <Lisa.McMinn@SPA.texas.gov>

/s/ Gail Kikawa McConnell Gail Kikawa McConnell

1 AP-76,051 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 11/5/2015 8:51:36 AM Accepted 11/5/2015 8:52:59 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
98-2210.

#### State ex rel. Vance v. Rockwell Internatl.

Franklin App. No. 97APD06-869. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the motion for stay filed by Rockwell International,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.
#### § 77.35-10 Fireman's outfit.

(a) Each fireman's outfit must consist of one self-contained breathing apparatus, one lifeline with a belt or a suitable harness, one flashlight, one flame safety lamp, one rigid helmet, boots and gloves, protective clothing, and one fire ax. In lieu of the flame safety lamp, vessels may carry an oxygen depletion meter which is listed by a Coast Guard recognized independent laboratory as intrinsically safe.

(b) The number of fireman's outfits required are as set forth in table [77.35-10(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-77.35-10#p-77.35-10(b)).

Table [77.35-10](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-77.35-10)(b)

| Gross tonnage | | Minimum number of fireman's outfits |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Over— | Not over— |
| | 10,000 | 2 |
| 10,000 | 20,000 | 3 |
| 20,000 | | 4 |

[CGFR 65-50, [30 FR 16953](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/30-FR-16953), Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 67-87, [32 FR 19181](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/32-FR-19181), Dec. 20, 1967; CGD 86-036, [57 FR 48325](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-48325), Oct. 23, 1992; CGD 95-028, [62 FR 51204](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-51204), Sept. 30, 1997]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES F. LONGNECKER, II,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 15-11705

Honorable John Corbett O’Meara

ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRAND’S

DECEMBER 28, 2015 ORDER

This matter came before the court on plaintiff Charles F. Longnecker, II's January 13, 2016

objections to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's December 28, 2015 order denying Plaintiff's

motion to award expenses. Defendant filed a response January 19, 2016. No oral argument was

heard.

The court, pursuant to Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(A), has reviewed the magistrate judge’s order, as well as Plaintiff's objections and

Defendant's response to those objections, and finds that the order is not clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand’s December 28, 2015 order

is AFFIRMED.

s/John Corbett O'Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: February 11, 2016

5:15-cv-11705-JCO-DRG Doc # 47 Filed 02/11/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 936
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record

on this date, February 11, 2016, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2

5:15-cv-11705-JCO-DRG Doc # 47 Filed 02/11/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 937
[Hillsborough,

June, 1880.]

#### Ring *v.*Holt.

*Burns,*for the plaintiff.

*Wallace,*for the defendant.

Report of a referee whose general finding for the plaintiff was apparently based on an inference of fact. No error, of law appearing, judgment was rendered on the report.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.