alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24G
 
                           SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints JOSEPH HINES and CLARENCE J. BAUDHUIN, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 1997, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.
 
DATED: October 7, 1997
 
                                              /s/  CURTIS M. ROCCA III
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                   CURTIS M. ROCCA III
STATE OF ARIZONA
                               ss.
County of Maricopa
 
     On this 7th day of October, 1997, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally appeared CURTIS M. ROCCA III, known to me to be the person whose name
is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the
same for the purposes therein contained.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
 
                                                 /s/  JANICE BACKUS
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Notary Public
 
My commission expires:
 
October 23, 1997
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 15, 1995 (80), Para 80.25 Memorials]
[Page 1009]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.80.25  memorials

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       112. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the State of Colorado, relative to the 
     reauthorization of the Conservation Program Improvements Act; 
     to the Committee on Agriculture.
       113. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, relative to maintaining the 
     status quo at Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA; to the Committee on 
     National Security.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29522-29523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Population Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: June 21-22, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#097e6865657a6a496468606527676061276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd8a9c91918e9ebd909c9491d3939495d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Maternal Employment, The Economy 
and Family.
    Date: June 22, 2007.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.

[[Page 29523]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#245345484857476449454d480a4a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2057414c4c5343604d41494c0e4e49480e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2618 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[107th Congress Public Law 7]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ007.107]

Public Law 107-7
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2305 Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, as the ``Ronald W. Reagan 
Post Office of West Melbourne, Florida''. <<NOTE: Apr. 12, 2001 -  [H.R. 
                                 395]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2305 
Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Ronald W. Reagan Post Office of West Melbourne, Florida''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald W. Reagan Post Office 
of West Melbourne, Florida''.

    Approved April 12, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 395:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Feb. 6, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARIO GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-30187

D.C. No. 2:06-CR-00096-LRS-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010 ** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and NR SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Mario Garcia appeals from his the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-30187

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia’s counsel has

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro

se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Garcia’s request

for new counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending March 14, 2009

|Filer              | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------ | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|RMB HOLDINGS, INC. | * 3A3       | RMB Holdings, LLC, along with ATB Management, LLC, both of Birmingham, Alabama, to acquire up to 30 percent of the outstanding shares of Americus Financial Services, Inc., and its subsidiary, Red Mountain Bank, N.A., both of Birmingham, Alabama. | Newspaper:03/29/2009Federal Register:03/30/2009
|Newspaper:         | 03/29/2009 
|Federal Register:  | 03/30/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2012065EN.01002502.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/25

---

Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-140/11)

2012/C 65/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Ph.-E. Partsch, E. Raimond, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Director General of OLAF issuing a final invitation to the applicant to be heard in an internal enquiry and stating that a final report on the enquiry was to be adopted on the basis only of the information gathered and analysed unilaterally by OLAF if the applicant did not comply with that invitation and the letter rejecting the applicant’s claim

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 28 October 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 28 October 2011;

| — | Annul the decision of 2 December 2011 ruling on the claim of 21 November 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 2 December 2011 ruling on the claim of 21 November 2011;

| — | Award the applicant the sum of EUR 7 000 in respect of compensatory damages; |
| --- | --- |

—

Award the applicant the sum of EUR 7 000 in respect of compensatory damages;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
##### 



- 1 - Exhibit
4.33
 THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
 BETWEEN
 (1)
    
    J.I.C. TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED, a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands whose
registered office is at Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive, P.O. Box 2681, Grand Cayman, KY1-1111,
Cayman Islands (the Vendor); and(2)
    
    NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC., a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands whose
registered office is at McNamara Chambers, P.O. Box 3342, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin
Islands (the Purchaser).
 WHEREAS:-
 (A)
    
    The Vendor and the Purchaser entered into an agreement (the Jetup Acquisition Agreement) on
24 September 2007 whereby the Vendor agreed to sell and the Purchaser agreed to purchase 91%
interest in Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
(CHINESE CHARACTERS) legally and
beneficially owned by the Vendor subject to and upon the terms and conditions of the Jetup
Acquisition Agreement.(B)
    
    The parties now wish to enter into this Agreement to add one additional condition precedent
to the acquisition of the Sale Interest pursuant to the Jetup Acquisition Agreement.
 NOW IT IS AGREED
 1.
    
    INTERPRETATION1.01
    
    This Supplemental Agreement shall supplement and be read in conjunction with the Jetup
Acquisition Agreement; however where any provision in this Supplemental Agreement is
inconsistent with any provision in the Jetup Acquisition Agreement, this Supplemental
Agreement shall prevail.1.02
    
    In this Supplemental Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires:-
 (a)
    
    definitions shall have the same meaning as provided for in the Jetup
Acquisition Agreement; and(b)
    
    any reference to a Clause or to Appendix or to a Recital is a reference
respectively to a clause, appendix or recital of this Supplemental Agreement.(c)
    
    the Namtek Acquisition Agreement shall mean an agreement of even date
entered into between the Vendor and NTEEP whereby NTEEP agreed to sell and the Vendor
agreed to purchase the entire interest in (i) Kabushiki Kaisha Namtek Japan; and (ii)
Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd., subject to and upon the terms and conditons of the Namtek
Acquisition Agreement.




---



##### 



- 2 - 
 2.
    
    ADDITIONAL CONDITIONIn addition to the Conditions under Clause 3.01 of the Jetup Acquisition Agreement, the
Completion shall be conditional upon completion of the Namtek Acquisition Agreement
becoming unconditional in all respects (save in respect of any condition relating to
completion of the Jetup Acquisition Agreement as supplemented and amended by this
Supplemental Agreement).
  SIGNED by
    
    
    ))
    
    
    /s/ [signature illegible]for and on behalf of
    
    
    )J.I.C. TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
    
    
    )LIMITED
    
    
    )in the presence of: /s/ [signature illegible]
 SIGNED by
    
    
    ))
    
    
    /s/ Koo Ming Kownfor and on behalf of
    
    
    )NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.
    
    
    )in the presence of: /s/ [signature illegible]
    
    
    )
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 20, 2008

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|LIBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS | Member         | Liberty Bank, Jonesboro, Arkansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                                                                                   | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | Not applicable
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable
|MIDLAND STATES BANK      | * 18C* Branch  | Midland States Bank, Effingham, Illinois, to purchase the assets and assume the liabilities of two branches of Peoples National Bank, N.A., Mount Vernon, Illinois, and to retain the acquired facilities as branches. | Newspaper:10/16/2008Federal Register:Not applicable    
|Newspaper:               | 10/16/2008    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location              | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|EXCHANGE BK NE MO, KAHOKA, MISSOURI | 2747466 | 06/16/2008 | 09/05/2008     | S         | Small Bank 
|LEGACY BK & TR CO, PLATO, MISSOURI  | 397755  | 06/02/2008 | 08/22/2008     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 7.40 Delaware Bay and tributaries.

A line drawn from Cape May Inlet East Jetty Light to latitude 38°55.8′ N. longitude 74°51.4′ W. (Cape May Harbor Inlet Lighted Bell Buoy “2CM”); thence to latitude 38°48.9′ N. longitude 75°02.3′ W. (Delaware Bay Entrance Channel Lighted Buoy “8”); thence to the northernmost extremity of Cape Henlopen.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00467

- CR

DWANA CONNER A/K/A S WANNA

CONNER APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JU DGMENT

----------

We have considered “ Appellant ’ s Motion To Withdraw Appeal. ” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this mo tion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 31, 2013
#### § 92.20-45 Lighting.

Each berth must have a light.
#### S. J. Bullard et al. v. The State.

*No. 237.*

*Decided January 20.*

Bail Bond—Scire Facias—Impossible Date.—Where a bail bond was forfeited and judgment nisi rendered at the July Term of court, and scire facias issued to the sureties on the ‘20th day of July, requiring them to appear and answer on the third Monday of said month, which was the 18th of July, a day .already passed: *Held,*that the citation being for an impossible date, a judgment by default at a subsequent term of court was void for want of proper service.

Writ of Error from the County Court of Ellis. Tried below before Hon. B. McDaniel.

At the July Term of the County Court of Ellis County the appearance bond of Claude Bullard for §100 was forfeited, and judgment nisi rendered. Appellants, S. J. Bullard and F. Hapson, were sureties on said bond. The scire facias for these sureties, which was attested July 20, 1892, commanded appellants to appear and answer on the third Monday in July, which was the 18th day of July, a date already past at the time of the issuance of the writ of scire facias.

At the October Term, 1892, the sureties failing to appear and answer, judgment final by default was rendered against them, and it is from this judgment they prosecute this their writ of error.

M. *B. Templeton,*for plaintiffs in error.

The court erred in rendering judgment by default against appellants, no appearance having been made, because the citation herein commanded them to appear at an impossible date, and at a date prior to the time of its issuance, and at a time when there was no court; in this, said citation was issued July 20, 1892, and commanded them to appear on the third Monday in July, 1892, which was the 18th day of July, 1892. 1 W. *&*W. C. C., sec. 520.

*519*R. L.*Henry, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The bail bond herein was forfeited at the July Term of the court. Citation issued to the sureties on the 20th day of the same month, requiring them to appear and answer on the third Monday thereof, which was the 18th day of the month. Judgment final, by default, was subsequently entered at the October Term.

The citation required appearance at an impossible date, two days before its attestation and issuance. It should have required the sureties to appear at the following term of the court. 1 W. *&*W. C. C., sec. 520; Willson's Crim. Proc., sec. 2017.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
#### § 57.05-4 Welder qualification by procedure tests.

Qualification tests of welders may be omitted for welders who weld satisfactory procedure qualification test assemblies as required by subpart 57.03.