alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011211EN.01003101.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/31

---

Action brought on 24 May 2011 — Video Research USA/OHMI (VR)

(Case T-267/11)

2011/C 211/65

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Video Research USA, Inc. (New York, U.S.A.) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 March 2011 in case R 1187/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 March 2011 in case R 1187/2010-2;

| — | Remit the case to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with a recommendation that restitutio in integrum be granted in respect of community trade mark application No 919324; |
| --- | --- |

—

Remit the case to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with a recommendation that restitutio in integrum be granted in respect of community trade mark application No 919324;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘VR’ — Community trade mark registration No 919324

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Trade Marks and Register Department: Rejected the request for restitutio in integrum and confirmed the cancellation of the Community trade mark registration No 919324

Decision of the Trade Marks and Register Department:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 81 of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in the application of this article and in its assessment of the facts in holding that the applicant’s representatives had failed to exercise due care in the circumstances.

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 22.01
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Capital Re Corporation, a Delaware insurance holding company;

Credit Re Corporation, a Maryland corporation;

Capital Re LLC, a Turks and Caicos limited life company;

Capital Reinsurance Company, a Maryland domiciled insurance company;

Capital Credit Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company;

Capital Mortgage Reinsurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company;

Capital Title Reinsurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company;

KRE Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company

Capital Re Management Corporation, a New York reinsurance intermediary

Capital Re (UK) Holdings

CRC Capital, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of England

RGB Holdings, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of England

RGB Underwriting Services, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
England

RGB Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
England

Capital Global Managers, Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled managing general agency

Capital Global Underwriters, Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company
#### Joseph A. Vose, *Appellant, v.*Charles F. Chickering and another, *Respondents.*

Judgment affirmed.
Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
        (logo)         Suite 1800                      Telephone: (501) 370-3600
                       111 Center Street               Facsimile: (501) 374-4809
                       Little Rock, Arkansas 72201     Facsimile: (501) 375-7817


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To LSI Financial Group:

We have examined  management's  assertion about LSI Financial Group's compliance
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
("USAP")  as of and for the  year  ended  December  31,  1996,  included  in the
accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for LSI Financial
Group's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's  assertion  about the entity's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about LSI Financial Group's compliance with
the minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other  procedures as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on LSI  Financial  Group's  compliance  with  the  minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that LSI Financial  Group complied with
the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 21, 1997



DELOITTE TOUCHE
TOHMATSU
INTERNATIONAL
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF PANNELL KERR FORSTER
                        -------------------------------
                                        


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Aura Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-1315, 33-75160, 333-
41509 and 333-46773) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-66982) of our report dated June
10, 1998, on our audits of the financial statements of Aura Systems, Inc. as of
February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997, and February 29, 1996, and for each of the
three years then ended, which report appears in the Form 10-K of Aura Systems,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998.



PANNELL KERR FORSTER
Los Angeles, California
June 10, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LYNN GOODE

, §

No. 08

- 1 2

- 00 130

- C V

Appellant, §

Appeal from the

v. §

394th District Court

TIMOTHY J. CROWLEY,

of Presidio County, Texas

§

Appellee. (TC# 7066)

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Lynn Goode, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) because the parties have settled all matters in dispute. We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. Pursuant to the parties ’ agreement, we assess costs against the party

incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

September 19, 2012

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.

McClure, C.J., not participating
Argued and submitted November 27,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 27, 1995

#### LARRY FLOYD WIMBER, *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, *Respondent.*

(CA A85374)

908 P2d 848

Steven H. Gorham argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Christine A. Chute, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Fernandez v. Board of Parole,*137 Or App 247, 904 P2d 1071 (1995).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>               0000701719
<NAME>              Dallas Gold and Silver Exchange, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                                        US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1
<CASH>                                                    181
<SECURITIES>                                            2,704
<RECEIVABLES>                                             143
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             1,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        4,655
<PP&E>                                                  1,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                            743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,623
<BONDS>                                                 1,530
<COMMON>                                                   42
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,795
<SALES>                                                 4,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,270
<CGS>                                                   3,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           3,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (754)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (264)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.11)
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **5 -**  **7456**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RAOUL LAFOND, a/k/a Chris Lafond, a/k/a Jim, a/k/a Jamaican Jim, a/k/a Derrick Burch, a/k/a Fletcher Busbee, a/k/a Ronald Elie, a/k/a Ronald Ely , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 6:96

- cr - 00212

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : January 28, 2016 Decided: February 19, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Att orneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI A M: Raoul Lafond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lafond , No. 6:96

- cr - 00212

- WO

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                              91
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    91
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      91
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        91
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3202)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3202)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending October 16, 2010

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|ANCHOR BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | Anchor Bancorp, Inc., Lacey, Washington, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Anchor Mutual Savings Bank, Aberdeen, Washington, upon conversion from a mutual savings bank to a stock savings bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/15/2010
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 04/15/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 2, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Shie, Appellant, *v.*Leonard, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Shie v. Leonard*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 160.]

(No. 98-1673

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided December 16, 1998.)

*David Zion Shie, pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Diane Mallory,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

In his propositions of law, Shie asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. In order to withstand dismissal, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus must conform to R.C. 2725.04 and state with particularity the extraordinary circumstances entitling the petitioner to the writ. *161
      *McBroom v. Russell*(1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 47, 48, 671 N.E.2d 10, 11. For the following reasons, Shie’s claims were insufficient to withstand dismissal.

First, as the court of appeals correctly held, the trial court had jurisdiction over Shie because he was charged, convicted, and sentenced for offenses that occurred when he was an adult. Shie’s plea of guilty constituted a complete admission of the charges for which he was convicted and sentenced. *State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio*(1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 422, 423, 662 N.E.2d 370, 372; Crim.R. 11(B)(1).

Second, Shie’s claim that the indictment charges were inaccurate because the rape count to which he pled guilty actually occurred before the dates specified attacks the validity or sufficiency of his indictment and is not cognizable in habeas corpus. *Thornton v. Russell*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 93, 94, 694 N.E.2d 464, 465.

Finally, Shie has or had adequate legal remedies such as a petition for postconviction relief and motion to withdraw his guilty plea to raise his contentions concerning the accuracy of the indictment and his innocence. Cf. *State ex rel. Tran v. McGrath*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 45, 47, 676 N.E.2d 108, 109.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 4, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 2, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### William F. Kidder, *Respondent, v.*John Bowne and others, *Executors, etc.,*-. Joseph Richardson, *Petitioner, etc., Appellant*.

Order reversed, without costs. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
----

----

Exhibit 10.53

----

----

|   | WEINGARTEN      REALTY INVESTORS |                                               |
|--------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |                                               |   |
|   | By:                              | /s/ Stephen      C. Richter                   |   |
|   |                             | Stephen      C. Richter                            |   |
|   | Its:                             | Executive      Vice Pres., Chief Financial Officer |   |

|   | RELIANCE      TRUST COMPANY |                        |
|--------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |                        |                        |   |
|   | By:                         | /s/ Kimberly      Lowe |   |
|   |                        | Kimberly      Lowe          |   |
|   | Its:                        | Vice      President         |   |
|   |                        |                        |   |

----

----