alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10.5

 

 FURTHER AMENDMENT
 

 to POLICY PURCHASE AGREEMENT entered March 15. 2012 (As amended April 27, 2012)
 

 In reference to the Policy Purchase Agreement by and between Universal Settlements International Inc. (“USI”) and Crown Alliance Capital Limited (“CACL”) (together, the “parties”) as noted above, section 18 of said agreement headed “Termination Date” is hereby further amended to extend termination date to October 31, 2013.
 

 In addition, the parties have agreed that with the material delay in placing the Funding Cost into escrow as set out in section 1 of above noted agreement, and the material extensions to the Termination date, the parties agreed that in the event of any early maturities, section 1(c) of the above agreement headed Early Maturities, is amended to provide that the purchase price of any policy where there is an early maturity shall be paid to USI out of the maturity proceeds first, with the balance of the maturity proceeds after payment of the policy purchase price to USI to be shared equally between the parties.
 

 	 	
	 USI:
	 By: /s/ J. Panos

	  
	 J. Panos, President

	  
	 Universal Settlements International Inc.

	  
	 5500 North Service Road, Suite 703

	  
	 Burlington

	  
	 Ontario, L7L 6W6

	  
	  

	 Purchaser
	 BY: /s/ L. Fusco

	  
	 L. Fusco, President

	  
	 Crown Alliance Capital Limited

	  
	 2895 Drew Road, Suite 217

	  
	 Mississauga

	  
	 Ontario L4T DA4
§ 78.47-11 Carbon dioxide warning signs. Each entrance to a space storing carbon dioxide cylinders, a space protected by carbon dioxide systems, or any space into which carbon dioxide might migrate must be conspicuously marked as follows: ( a ) Spaces storing carbon dioxide—“CARBON DIOXIDE GAS CAN CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. VENTILATE THE AREA BEFORE ENTERING. A HIGH CONCENTRATION CAN OCCUR IN THIS AREA AND CAN CAUSE SUFFOCATION.”.
( b ) Spaces protected by carbon dioxide—“CARBON DIOXIDE GAS CAN CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. WHEN ALARM OPERATES OR WINTERGREEN SCENT IS DETECTED, DO NOT ENTER UNTIL VENTILATED. LOCK OUT SYSTEM WHEN SERVICING.” The reference to wintergreen scent may be omitted for carbon dioxide systems not required to have odorizing units and not equipped with such units.
( c ) Spaces into which carbon dioxide might migrate—“CARBON DIOXIDE GAS CAN CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. DISCHARGE INTO NEARBY SPACE CAN COLLECT HERE. WHEN ALARM OPERATES OR WINTERGREEN SCENT IS DETECTED VACATE IMMEDIATELY.” The reference to wintergreen scent may be omitted for carbon dioxide systems not required to have odorizing units and not equipped with such units.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33877, June 7, 2012]
#### The State ex rel. Baisden, Appellant, *v.*Grimes Aerospace Corporation et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Baisden v. Grimes Aerospace Corp.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 218.]

(No. 96-2217

Submitted October 27, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*219
      *Michael J. Muldoon,*for appellant.

*Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur*and *Brian D. Hall,*for appellee Grimes Aerospace Company.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Gerald H. Waterman,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1633 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1633

To amend chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code, to make technical 
corrections in the employment and reemployment rights of members of the 
              uniformed services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1995

Ms. Waters (for herself, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Mascara, and 
  Mr. Evans) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code, to make technical 
corrections in the employment and reemployment rights of members of the 
              uniformed services, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 4317(a)(1)(A) of chapter 43 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by striking out ``paragraphs (2) and (3)'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``subparagraph (B)''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT FOR RESERVISTS.

    (a) CSRS.--(1) Section 8331(13) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by striking out ``that occurs on or after August 1, 1990''.
    (2) Section 8334(j)(1)(B) of such title is amended by striking out 
``occurs on or after August 1, 1990,'' and inserting in lieu thereof a 
comma.
    (b) FERS.--(1) Section 8401(31) of such title is amended by 
striking out ``that occurs on or after August 1, 1990''.
    (2) Section 8422(e)(1)(B) of such title is amended by striking out 
``occurs on or after August 1, 1990,'' and inserting in lieu thereof a 
comma.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 386.3 Preservation of property.

Prohibited actions against property on the Academy grounds are improper disposal of rubbish; theft of or damage to property; throwing articles from an Academy building; and climbing on statues, fountains or any part of a building.
§ 69.17 Application for measurement services. ( a ) The vessel owner is responsible for having the vessel measured or remeasured under this part. Applications for Formal Measurement may be obtained from any measurement organization and, once completed, are submitted to the authorized measurement organization that will perform the measurement services. Applications for Simplified Measurement may be obtained from the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC-4) and, once completed, are submitted or retained as described in § 69.205. The contents of the application are described in this part under the requirements for each system.
( b ) Applications for measurement under more than one system may be combined.
( c ) For vessels under construction, the application should be submitted before the vessel is advanced in construction. Usually, this means as soon as the decks are laid, holds cleared of encumbrances, engines installed, and accommodations partitioned.
[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18719, Mar. 31, 2016]
#### § 96.35-1 Application.

This subpart, except § 96.35-90, applies to each vessel that is on an international voyage and is contracted for on or after November 23, 1992. Each vessel that is on an international voyage and is contracted for before November 23, 1992, must satisfy § 96.35-90.

[CGD 86-036, 57 FR 48325, Oct. 23, 1992]
§ 169.840 Verification of vessel compliance with applicable stability requirements. ( a ) After loading and prior to departure and at all other times necessary to assure the safety of the vessel, the master shall determine that the vessel complies with all applicable stability requirements in the vessel's trim and stability book, stability letter, Certificate of Inspection, and Load Line Certificate, as the case may be, and then enter an attestation statement of the verification in the log book. The vessel may not depart until it is in compliance with these requirements.
( b ) When determining compliance with applicable stability requirements the vessel's draft, trim, and stability must be determined as necessary and any stability calculations made in support of the determination must be retained on board the vessel for the duration of the voyage.
[CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41825, Sept. 11, 1992]
§ 10.23 Accounting of disclosures. Each operating administration, the Office of Inspector General, and the Office of the Secretary, with respect to each system of records under its control: ( a ) Except for disclosures made under § 10.35(a) (1) or (2) of this part, keep an accurate accounting of: ( 1 ) The date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record to any person or to another agency made under § 10.33; and
( 2 ) The name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure is made;
( b ) Retains the accounting made under paragraph (a) of this section for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, after the disclosure for which the accounting is made;
( c ) Except for disclosures made under § 10.33(a)(7) of this part, makes the accounting made under paragraph (a)(1) of this section available to the individual named in the record at his request; and
( d ) Informs any person or other agency about any correction or notation of dispute made by the agency in accordance with § 10.45 of any record that has been disclosed to the person or agency if an accounting of the disclosure was made.
[45 FR 8993, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended at 62 FR 23667, May 1, 1997]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 10, 2009

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP | 4c8            | Notification by Middlefield Banc Corp., Middlefield, Ohio to engage de novo in activities permissible pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act and 225.28(b)(1) and (b)(2)of the Board's Regulation Y | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:10/20/2009
|Newspaper:            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:     | 10/20/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, March 10, 1995 (42), Para 42.15 Hour of Meeting]
[Pages 372-373]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.42.15  hour of meeting

  On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That when the House adjourns on Monday, March 13, 1995, it 
adjourn to meet at 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, for ``morning 
hour'' debates.

[[Page 373]]
```
Presidential Documents

18103 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 69 

Wednesday, April 11, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of March 23, 2007 

Assignment of Functions Under Section 530 of the Foreign 

Relations Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, 

and Section 2(b)(4) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, 

as Amended 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the 

United States Code, I hereby assign to you: 

(1)the functions of the President under section 530 of the Foreign Relations 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236) 

(22 U.S.C. 2429a–2); and 

(2)the functions of the President under section 2(b)(4) of the Export-Import 

Bank Act of 1945, as amended (12 U.S.C. 635). 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

[FR Doc. 07–1822 

Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.2



                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and
         2)       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated: November 5, 2003                    By /s/ John Benson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                            John Benson, Chief Financial Officer
                                            and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

MARK CHOMOS, 

Plaintiff, 

 

v. Case No. 15-10103 

WOODHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND TERMINATING AS MOOT 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 

 Defendants Lieutenant Toth and Detective Brust1 filed a motion for summary 

judgment in this civil rights action on April 13, 2017. (Dkt. # 157.) Plaintiff Mark Chomos 

did not file a response to the motion, and indicated in a separate filing that he did not 

oppose the summary judgment motion. (See Dkt. # 161.) On May 25, 2017, Magistrate 

Judge David R. Grand, to whom all pretrial matters have been referred pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1983, filed a report and recommendation that summary judgment be granted. 

(Dkt. # 163.) Shortly after, on May 30, the parties submitted a stipulated motion to 

dismiss Defendants with prejudice. (Dkt. # 165.) As a result, the report and 

recommendation is moot, as is the underlying summary judgment motion. Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the stipulated motion to dismiss Defendants Toth and Brust 

(Dkt. # 165) is GRANTED. As agreed in the motion, the dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation (Dkt. # 163) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. 

 

1 Full names for Defendants do not appear in the pleadings. Detective Brust was 

incorrectly pled as “Burst.” (Dkt. # 163, Pg. ID 3436.) 
2 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the underlying summary judgment motion (Dkt. 

# 157) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. 

s/Robert H. Cleland / 

ROBERT H. CLELAND 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 7, 2017 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record 

on this date, June 7, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

s/Lisa Wagner / 

 Case Manager and Deputy Clerk 

 (810) 292-6522 

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\15-10103.CHOMOS.dismiss.defendants.terminate.R&R.TLH.docx
#### State *v.*Drake.

Under the General Laws (1878) the state has no right peremptorily to challenge a juror.

Indictment eor Perjury. The state was permitted peremptorily to challenge a juror, and the respondent excepted. Verdict, guilty.

Marston, for the respondent.

*Solicitor*and *Page,*for the state.

Bingham, J.

Prior to the passage of *c.*2,213, Laws of 1859, a party had no right to claim that his cause should be tried by any particular jury, or to insist that any particular juror should be retained, merely because there was no legal ground for challenging him. *Watson*v. *Walker,*33 N. H. 131, 144; *Walker*v. *Kennison,*34 N. H. 259. That act provided that a jury should be empanelled to try each cause, and prescribed the manner in which it should be empanelled. That mode, in a modified form, is retained in the General Laws. It must be strictly followed, and no juror can be set aside by the court, except upon challenge for a cause which the law recognizes as sufficient. *Watson*v. *Walker, supra.*The right to two peremptory challenges was given to the state by *s.*1, *c.*2,350, Laws of 1860, wdiich was reenacted in Gen. St., *c.*243, s. 9; but that provision, omitted from the General Laws, is no longer in force. *Corey*v. *Bath,*35 N. H. 540.

*Verdict set aside.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
                  CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
 
 Contour Medical, Inc.
 St. Petersburg, Florida
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
 Statement of Contour Medical, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated August
 18, 1995, except for the stock split discussed in Note 10 which is as of
 March 15, 1996, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
 Contour Medical, Inc.
 and subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
 the year ended June 30, 1996.
 
 
                                     /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                     BDO Seidman, LLP
 
 Orlando, Florida
 September 27, 1996
#### Robert R. Westover, *as Executor, etc., Respondent, v.*The Ætna Life Insurance Company, *Appellant.*

■ — ■ New trial denied, order affirmed and judgment made absolute. Opinion by

Barker, J.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) by American MedicalAlert Corp. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Richard Rallo |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Richard Rallo                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

**A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAmerican Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American Medical AlertCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.**

 

1

----
Coastal Impingement

Percentile

Region % Value Range Count

West Coast 5% 5,800 0-5% 1

10% 8,600 >5-10% -

25% 17,000 >10-25% 1

50% 100,000 >25-50% 1

75% 270,000 >50-75% 1

90% 870,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Northeastern Coastal 5% 2,900 0-5% 1

10% 5,400 >5-10% 1

25% 9,200 >10-25% 2

50% 20,000 >25-50% 4

75% 140,000 >50-75% 4

90% 6,300,000 >75-90% 2

>90% 2

Mid-Atlantic Coastal 5% 4,000 0-5% 1

10% 5,100 >5-10% -

25% 34,000 >10-25% 1

50% 150,000 >25-50% 2

75% 170,000 >50-75% 1

90% 260,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Southern Coastal and Gulf 5% 7,000 0-5% 1

10% 8,100 >5-10% -

25% 17,000 >10-25% 1

50% 77,000 >25-50% 2

75% 240,000 >50-75% 1

 Facilities Within a 

Specified 

Percentile Range 

75% 240,000 >50-75% 1

90% 760,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

All Coastal Facilities 5% 2,900 0-5% 3

10% 3,100 >5-10% 2

25% 8,900 >10-25% 6

50% 26,000 >25-50% 10

75% 180,000 >50-75% 9

90% 590,000 >75-90% 5

>90% 4
Freshwater Impingement

Percentile

Region % Value Range Count

Great Lakes 5% 1,800 0-5% 2

10% 3,100 >5-10% 1

25% 19,000 >10-25% 3

50% 360,000 >25-50% 5

75% 2,800,000 >50-75% 5

90% 24,000,000 >75-90% 3

>90% 3

Southeastern Reservoirs 5% 8,600 0-5% 1

10% 9,200 >5-10% -

25% 27,000 >10-25% 1

50% 53,000 >25-50% 2

75% 180,000 >50-75% 1

90% 190,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Midwestern Reservoirs 5% 660 0-5% 1

10% 1,100 >5-10% -

25% 13,000 >10-25% 2

50% 120,000 >25-50% 2

75% 330,000 >50-75% 2

90% 2,100,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Southwestern Cooling Lakes 5% 3,200 0-5% 1

10% 5,200 >5-10% -

25% 10,000 >10-25% 2

50% 42,000 >25-50% 2

 Facilities Within a 

Specified 

Percentile Range 

50% 42,000 >25-50% 2

75% 220,000 >50-75% 2

90% 320,000 >75-90% 2

>90% 1

Large Rivers 5% 420 0-5% 3

10% 1,200 >5-10% 2

25% 6,100 >10-25% 8

50% 52,000 >25-50% 12

75% 170,000 >50-75% 12

90% 860,000 >75-90% 7

>90% 5

Small Rivers 5% 700 0-5% 2

10% 990 >5-10% 1

25% 4,500 >10-25% 5

50% 42,000 >25-50% 7

75% 290,000 >50-75% 7

90% 1,100,000 >75-90% 4

>90% 3

All Freshwater Facilities 5% 740 0-5% 7

10% 1,300 >5-10% 6

25% 7,300 >10-25% 19

50% 56,000 >25-50% 31

75% 280,000 >50-75% 31

90% 1,800,000 >75-90% 19

>90% 13
All Facilities Combined

Percentile

Collection Type % Value Range Count

Impingement 5% 1,045 0-5% 10

10% 1,772 >5-10% 8

25% 8,079 >10-25% 25

50% 59,318 >25-50% 41

75% 262,602 >50-75% 40

90% 1,622,137 >75-90% 24

100% >90% 17

Entrainment 5% 578,749 0-5% 5

10% 1,384,028 >5-10% 4

25% 10,414,685 >10-25% 13

50% 60,063,200 >25-50% 21

75% 553,971,320 >50-75% 22

90% 3,057,658,526 >75-90% 13

100% >90% 11

 Facilities Within a 

Specified 

Percentile Range