alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT O F ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

GENERAL SERVICE FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND INCANDESCENT

REFLECTOR LAMPS

U.S. D epartment o f Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

9 a.m. ­ 5 p.m. ET, Room 1E­245

Purpose

Th e D epartment of Energy (DOE) will receive comments on the Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking (NOPR) and the proposed standards as stated in the notice. In addition,

DOE will present the methodology used for the NOPR analysis and example results. The

Department will present its plans for the remaining analysis—the analysis to support the

Final Rule—and will seek input from stakeholders on the methodologies, assumptions,

data sources and analysis results.

Agenda

9 :00­9:05 a m Welcome

Linda G raves

9:05­9:15 a m Opening Remarks, Introductions and Agenda Review

Doug B rookman

9:15­9:30 a m Rulemaking Overview

Linda G raves and Mimi Gupta

Overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE

uses to generate results for each analysis, and the issues on

which DOE would like input during today’s meeting.

9:30­10:00 a m Comments from Participants

Doug B rookman

Open f orum for participants to make a brief summary

statement and/or identify their key issues regarding the

NOPR analyses, methods, data, and results.

10:00­11:00 a m Scope of Coverage, Product Classes, and Engineering

Analysis

Mimi G upta and Conan O’Rourke

Summary p resentation and discussion regarding the

approach used and factors considered for the determination,

market and technology assessment, screening analysis, and

engineering analysis, and a characterization of the results.

111:00­11:15 am

11:15 a m­12:00 p m

12:00­1:00 p m

1:00­1:30 pm

1:30­ 2:15

2 :15­2:45

2 :45­3:15 p m

3:15­3:45 pm

3:45­4:30 p m

4:30 p m B reak

L ife­Cycle C ost Analysis

Diana B urk

Summary p resentation and discussion regarding the

approach used and factors considered for the life-cycle cost

and payback period analyses, and a characterization of the

results.

Break f or Lunch (on your own)

National I mpact Analysis

Mimi G upta

Summary p resentation and discussion regarding the

approach used and factors considered for the national

energy savings, net present value, and shipments analysis,

and a characterization of the results.

Trial S tandard Levels, Consumer Subgroup Analysis,

and Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Mimi G upta and Doug Rossin

Summary p resentation and discussion regarding trial

standard levels and the approach used and factors

considered for the manufacturer impact analysis.

Utility I mpact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact

Analysis

Lessly G oudarzi and Mimi Gupta

Summary p resentation and discussion regarding the

approach used and factors considered for the utility,

employment, environmental, and regulatory analyses.

Break

D iscussion o f Other Issues

Doug B rookman

Open f orum to discuss any remaining questions or issues

identified by participants.

Next S teps and Closing Remarks

Linda G raves Participants w ill discuss outstanding issues and concluding

remarks.

Adjourn

2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 12, 2011

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|NEXTIER INCORPORATED | CIC         | Notice of Change in Bank Control by the Snyder Control Group to acquire an additional 41.1 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Nextier, Inc., Butler, PA resulting in a 51.0 percent controlling ownership interest. | Newspaper:02/28/2011Federal Register:02/25/2011
|Newspaper:           | 02/28/2011 
|Federal Register:    | 02/25/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 42.09-45 Correction of deficiencies. ( a ) During and after any survey made by the assigning and issuing authority, those items, fittings, etc., which are found to be in an unsatisfactory condition by the surveyor shall be repaired or renewed in order to place the vessel in a satisfactory condition.
( b ) No load line certificate shall be issued, endorsed, extended, or reissued or delivered to a vessel subject to this subchapter until after unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected as required by paragraph (a) of this section.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10057, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9013, June 5, 1969]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending July 26, 2008

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|EMBASSY BANCORP, INC | * 3A1         | Embassy Bancorp, Inc., Bethlehem, PA, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Embassy Bank for the Lehigh Valley, Bethlehem, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Charley Barnes v. The State.

*No. 6586.*

*Decided June 1.*

1. Practice—Competency of a Witness.—A person charged, whether by the same or another indictment, with the offense on trial is not a competent witness for the accused.

2. Same—Evidence—Charge of the Court.—Proof of a theft contemporaneous with that on trial is competent for the State, but the charge of the court is erroneous unless it limits and restricts such proof to its proper and single function.

Appeal from the District Court of Wilbarger. Tried below before Hon. G. A. Brown.

The conviction in this case was for horse theft, and the penalty assessed was a term of eight years in the penitentiary. The disposition of the questions raised on appeal does not require a statement of the facts proved.

*30
      *Jo. Hall,*for appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

Boode Brookin, the witness offered by defendant, and whose competency as a witness was raised by objection on the part of the prosecution, was clearly incompetent, he being charged by another indictment with the theft of the same animal for the theft of which appellant was upon trial. The court did not err in rejecting him as a witness. Code Crim. Proc., art. 732; Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 2437; Wood v. The State, 26 Texas Ct. App., 490.

Evidence was adduced on the trial of the theft of several other animals at the same time and place as the one for which defendant was being prosecuted. Though this evidence was admissible and legitimate, it was nevertheless the imperative duty of the court in its charge to so limit and restrict such evidence to the purposes for which alone it was admissible, as that the jury might not use it improperly in considering it in connection with the defendant’s guilt of theft of the animal for which he was upon trial. Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 2344; Davis v. The State, 23 Texas Ct. App., 210; Wheeler v. The State, Id., 598; Cravey v. The State, Id., 677; Willis v. The State, 24 Texas Ct. App., 584; Reno v. The State, 25 Texas Ct. App., 102; Gentry v. The State, Id., 614.

The omission of the court to so limit and restrict this evidence is confessed as error by the Assistant Attorney-General, and the judgment for this omission is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JERRON J. DAVIS, 

 Petitioner, Case No. 15-cv-11528 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

DUNCAN MACLAREN, 

 Respondent. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER TO CLARIFY PETITION FOR 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF #1) 

 Petitioner Jerron J. Davis (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner at the Kinross 

Correctional Facility in Kincheloe, Michigan. On April 28, 2105, Petitioner, 

acting pro se, filed a document with the Clerk of this Court entitled “State Writ of 

Habeas Corpus” (the “Habeas Filing”). (See ECF #1.) Petitioner captioned the 

Habeas Filing as if it was to be filed in Michigan’s 50th Judicial Circuit Court in 

Chippewa County, Michigan. (See id. at 1, Pg. ID 1.) Petitioner, however, mailed 

the Habeas Filing to the Clerk of this Court at its Detroit office. (See ECF #1-1 at 

5-6, Pg. ID 55-56.) It is unclear whether Petitioner intended to file a federal 

petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or if he simply 

mailed his Habeas Filing to the wrong court. Clarifying Petitioner’s intent is 

important because the filing of a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

2:15-cv-11528-MFL-EAS Doc # 5 Filed 06/17/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 65
2

could potentially have adverse consequences for Petitioner should he attempt to 

file a future federal habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner clarify, in writing, 

whether he intended to file the Habeas Filing with this Court as a petition for a writ 

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or if he intended to file the Habeas 

Filing with a state court. Petitioner shall file this written clarification within 45 

days of the date of this Order. Petitioner shall mail and address the written 

clarification to the “Clerk of the Court – United States District Court Eastern 

District of Michigan” at the following address: 231 West Lafayette Blvd., Detroit, 

Michigan 48226. Petitioner shall include at the beginning of his written 

clarification the caption of this case, “Jerron J. Davis v. Duncan McLaren,” and the 

case number “15-11528.” 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 17, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on June 17, 2015, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-11528-MFL-EAS Doc # 5 Filed 06/17/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 66
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LEDELL HAMMOND,

Plaintiff, No. 15-12051

v. District Judge Paul D. Borman

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

CITY OF TROY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery and Production of Documents

[Doc. #11].

First, “[a] party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have

conferred as required by Rule 26(f)” of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thus,

Plaintiff’s request for discovery is premature.

Secondly, once discovery commences, requests for production of documents and

interrogatories are directed to the party from whom discovery is sought, under

Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 and 33, respectively, not to the Court.

-1-

2:15-cv-12051-PDB-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 06/17/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 58
For these reasons, Plaintiff’s motion [Doc. #11] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: June 17, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record

on June 17, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla 

Case Manager to the

Honorable R. Steven Whalen

-2-

2:15-cv-12051-PDB-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 06/17/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 59
###### Editorial Note on Part 8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 8.400 Purpose.

This subpart establishes an alternative to subpart 2.01 of this chapter for certification of United States vessels.
Exhibit 4.63
 Contract on Trade Finance Amount
   
 
  Article 1 Trade Finance Amount




---



##### 



Article 2 Varieties and Amount of Trade Finance Amount




---



##### 



Article 3 Effective Period of Trade Finance Amount
 
   Article 4 Interest and Fees




---



##### 



Article 5 Usage of Trade Finance Amount




---



##### 



Article 6 Legal Documents Related to the Contract
 1 and 2




---



##### 



Article 7 Rights and Obligations of Both Parties




---



##### 



Article 8 Liabilities for Breach of Contract and Remedial Measures for Situations
Jeopardizing Party Bs Creditors Right




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



Article 9 Other Provisions




---



##### 








---



##### 



One
  
    triplicate.
 None




---



##### 



Article 10 Deputy Bank
  Article 11 Statement Clauses
    (seal of Nam Tai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co.,
Ltd.)
 (signature of Wong Kuen Ling)




---



##### 



Contract on Trade Finance Amount Jie2008 Rong0184011R the Contract).
 Article 1 the Contract,
 Article 2 The application of Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary
Credits
 Uniform Customs and Practice for
Documentary Credits
 Article 3 The Issuance and Amendment of L/C
     
 Article 4 External Payment under the L/C




---



##### 



Article 5 Exemption of information delivery and translation
  the Contract.
  Article 6 Exemption of the behaviors of the instructed Party
    Article 7 Disputes on the Basic Contract or Fraud on L/C




---



##### 



the Contract.
 Article 8 Other Rights and Obligations of
Both Parties
    Article 9 Liabilities for Breach of Contract
  the Contract
 the Contract.
 the Contract the Contract,
  
      Article 10 Other Stipulations
 Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits




---



##### 



(Signature of Wong Kuen Ling)
 (Seal
of Nam Tai
 Electronic
(Shenzhen)
Co., Ltd.)




---



##### 



Contract on Trade Finance Amount the Contract).
 Article 1 the Contract,
 Article 2 Trust Receipt Loan
  Article 3 Repayment
          Article 4 Other rights and obligations of both parties




---



##### 








---



##### 



Article 5 Liabilities for Breach of Contract
 the Contract, the Contract, the Contract,
        the Contract.
  Article 6 Other stipulations




---



##### 



(Signature of Wong Kuen Ling)
 (Seal of Nam Tai
Electronic (Shenzhen)
Co., Ltd.)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, March 24, 1995 (50), Para 50.12 Adjournment]
[Page 504]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.50.12  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. UNDERWOOD, pursuant to the special order heretofore 
agreed to, at 4 o'clock and 1 minute p.m., the House adjourned until 
12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 28, 1995.
```
§ 7.85 St. Simons Island, GA to Little Talbot Island, FL. ( a ) A line drawn from latitude 31°04.1′ N. longitude 81°16.7′ W. (St. Simons Lighted Whistle Buoy “ST S”) to latitude 30°42.7′ N. longitude 81°19.0′ W. (St. Mary's Entrance Lighted Whistle Buoy “1”); thence to Amelia Island Light.
( b ) A line drawn from the southernmost extremity of Amelia Island to latitude 30°29.4′ N. longitude 81°22.9′ W. (Nassau Sound Approach Buoy “6A”); thence to the northeasternmost extremity of Little Talbot Island.
Union Calendar No. 117

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1536

[Report No. 104–225]

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend

Affairs.esthetist positions in the Department of Veteransmination of locality salaries for certain nurse anretary of Veterans Affairs with respect to deterfor two years an expiring authority of the SecAUGUST 2, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 117

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1536

[Report No. 104–225]

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend for two years an expiring

authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs with respect to determination of locality salaries for certain nurse anesthetist positions in the

Department of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 1995

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

AUGUST 2, 1995

Additional sponsors: Mr. STUMP, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BILIRAKIS,

Mr. STEARNS, Mr. BARR, Mr. COOLEY, Mr. EVANS, Mr. FILNER, Ms.

BROWN of Florida, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. FLANAGAN, and Mr.

QUINN

AUGUST 2, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend for two

years an expiring authority of the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs with respect to determination of locality salaries

for certain nurse anesthetist positions in the Department

of Veterans Affairs.
2

•HR 1536 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 7451(d)(3)(C)(iii) of title 38, United States

4 Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘April 1, 1995’’ and in5 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 1997’’.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 24, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for  Quarter of 2009 ()

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 62.01-3 Scope. ( a ) This part contains the minimum requirements for vessel automated vital systems. Specifically, this part contains— ( 1 ) In subpart 62.25, the general requirements for all vital system automation;
( 2 ) In subpart 62.30, the criteria used to evaluate the designed reliability and safety of all automated vital systems;
( 3 ) In subpart 62.35, the minimum additional equipment, configuration, and functional requirements necessary when certain vital systems are automated; and
( 4 ) In subpart 62.50, the minimum additional requirements when automated systems are provided to replace specific personnel or to reduce overall crew requirements.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 81-030, 53 FR 17838, May 18, 1988, as amended by USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50189, June 12, 2024]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending May 5, 2007

|Filer                      | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CHAIN BRIDGE BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1       | Chain Bridge Bancorp, Inc., McLean, Virginia, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting securities of Chain Bridge Bank, National Association, McLean, Virginia (in organization). | Newspaper:05/31/2007Federal Register:05/31/2007
|Newspaper:                 | 05/31/2007 
|Federal Register:          | 05/31/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us