alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Equicap, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Peter Wang, the President, certify
pursuant to 18 C.F.R. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the company.




Date:  September
21, 2009





By:
              /s/ Peter WangPresident





This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
C.F.R. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Act 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Equicap, Inc. and will be retained by Equicap, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit  32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 16, 2005                 By  s/ L.S. Smith
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           L.S. Smith, Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Iyanna Brown 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Fifth Third Financial Corporation, an 

Ohio corporation 

Defendant. 

________________________________/

Case No. 15-12385 

Hon. Judith E. Levy 

Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

This matter having come before this Court upon Stipulation 

of the parties and this Court being otherwise fully advised in the 

premises; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint against 

Defendant is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without 

costs to any party. 

Dated: November 24, 2015 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:15-cv-12385-JEL-RSW ECF No. 17 filed 11/24/15 PageID.80 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s 

ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 24, 2015. 

s/Felicia M. Moses 

FELICIA M. MOSES 

Case Manager 

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, by 

and through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are 

dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorney fees to any party. 

Dated: November 24, 2015 

Dated: November 24, 2015 

Respectfully submitted, 

WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP 

By: _/s/ Laura N. You___________

Attorneys for Fifth Third 

NITZKIN & ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ Gary D. Nitzkin (with 

permission)_________________

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 5:15-cv-12385-JEL-RSW ECF No. 17 filed 11/24/15 PageID.81 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending November 6, 2010

|Filer                      | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|Feliciana Bancshares, Inc. | * 3A1       | Feliciana Bancshares, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Feliciana Bank & Trust Company, both of Clinton, Louisiana. | Newspaper:12/05/2010Federal Register:12/06/2010
|Newspaper:                 | 12/05/2010 
|Federal Register:          | 12/06/2010 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Appendix C 

Hydrogen Chloride (HCL) Continuous Emission 

Monitoring System Supporting Documents 

 Version 1.0 

 November, 2005 
Table of Contents 

1. Performance Specification Z: Specifications and Test Procedures For Hydrogen 

Chloride (HCL) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems At Stationary Sources, 

Eli Lilly, November 2005. 

2. Procedure DD: Quality Control and Quality Assurance Requirements for 

Hydrogen Chloride (HCL) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems At 

Stationary Sources, Eli Lilly, November 2005.
#### § 96.35-15 Stowage.

The fireman's outfits must be stored in widely separated, accessible locations.

[CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977]
§ 54.15-13 Rupture disks (modifies UG-127). ( a ) Paragraph UG-127 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) provides for the use of rupture disks in series with spring loaded safety or relief valves.
( b ) For certain pressure vessels containing substances which may render a relief or safety valve inoperative, or where the installation of a valve is considered impractical, the Commandant may authorize or require the use of a rupture disk in parallel with or in lieu of a spring-loaded safety or relief valve. These rupture disks must: ( 1 ) Comply with the general provisions of § 54.15-5 except as noted otherwise in this section;
( 2 ) Have a capacity for discharge such that the volume of release is sufficient to prevent the internal pressure from exceeding 120 percent of the “maximum allowable working pressure” with the pressure vessel exposed to fire conditions (see § 54.15-25); and,
( 3 ) Operate at a pressure level which does not produce fatigue failure of the disk. The normal maximum operating pressure multiplied by 1.3 must not exceed the nominal disk burst pressure. (Notice that this restriction for protection of the rupture disk will usually require operation below the “maximum allowable working pressure” of the pressure vessel and therefore should be considered in design.)
( c ) All disks must be oriented so that if rupture occurs, the disk fragments and pressure vessel discharge will be directed away from operating personnel and vital machinery.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65170, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 5.67 Physician-patient privilege.

For the purpose of these proceedings, the physician-patient privilege does not exist between a physician and a respondent.
Exhibit  32.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June
30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, John Benson, Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      March 19, 2010By
              /s/ John BensonJohn
      Benson, Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending September 5, 2009

----

EnforcementFirst Bank & Trust Company, Lebanon, Virginia  -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, September 3, 2009 					Midwest Independent Bancshares, Inc., Jefferson City, Missouri, and Midwest Independent Bank  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.					-Announced, September 3, 2009 					Nebraska Bankers' Bank, Lincoln, Nebraska  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance.					-Announced, September 3, 2009 					Union Bank and Trust Company, Bowling Green, Virginia  -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, September 3, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: September 10, 2009
§ 1.4 Construction. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) “Federal Aviation Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.”
( b ) “Federal Highway Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration.”
( c ) “Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.”
( d ) “Federal Railroad Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration.”
( e ) “Federal Transit Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration.”
( f ) “Maritime Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Maritime Administration.”
( g ) “National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.”
( h ) “Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.”
( i ) “Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.”
#### § 540.91 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

This section displays the control numbers assigned to information collection requirements of the Commission in this part by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. The Commission intends that this section comply with the requirements of section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act, which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each agency information collection requirement:

| Section | Current OMB Control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 540.4 (Form FMC-131) | 3072-0012 |
| 540.5 | 3072-0011 |
| 540.6 | 3072-0011 |
| 540.8 | 3072-0011 |
| 540.9 | 3072-0011 |
| 540.23 (Form FMC-131) | 3072-0012 |
| 540.24 | 3072-0011 |
| 540.26 | 3072-0011 |
| 540.27 | 3072-0011 |
#### § 30.10-41 Lakes, bays, and sounds—TB/B.

Under this designation shall be included all tank vessels navigating the waters of any of the lakes, bays, or sounds other than the waters of the Great Lakes.
#### § 97.45-1 Master and chief engineer responsible.

It shall be the duty of the master and the chief engineer of any vessel to require that a steam pressure is not carried in excess of that allowed by the certificate of inspection, and to require that the safety valves, once set by the inspector, are in no way tampered with or made inoperable.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51207, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### State *v.*Elhenan Andrews.

May Term, 1909.

Present: Roweix, C. J., Munson, Watson, Haselton, and Powers, JJ.

Opinion filed July 2, 1909.

*Criminal Law*— Evidence—Privilege *of Witnesses*— Answers *Tending to Criminate.*

The privilege of refusing to answer a question on the ground that the answer will tend to criminate him is strictly personal to the witness, and can be asserted by no one else; and, while the court may instruct the witness as to his rights in this regard, it is error to protect him by excluding material evidence when he fails to assert his privilege.

Information for unlawfully furnishing intoxicating liquor. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1909, Washington County, *Stanton,*J., presiding. Verdict, guilty; and judgment thereon. The respondent excepted. The opinion states the case.

*M. M. Gordon*for the respondent.

It was manifest error to exclude the evidence in question on the ground that it might criminate the witness since he did not claim his privilege in that regard. 4 Wig. Ev. §2270; *Foster*v. *Pierce,*11 Cush. 437; *Com.*v. *Pratt,*126 Mass. 462; *Com.*v. *Trider,*143 Mass. 180; *State*v. *Foster,*23 N. H. 348; *Chamberlin*v. *Wilson,*12 Vt. 491; *Ex parte Senior Jr.,*32 L. R. A. 133. Moreover, the witness had waived his right to claim his privilege, by testifying on the subject in direct examination. *Chamberlin*v. *Wilson,*12 Vt. 491; *State*v. *Duncan,*78 Vt. 364; *In re Consolidated Rendering Co.,*80 Vt. 55.

*Benjamin Gates,*State’s Attorney, for the State.

Munson, J.

Mahoney, the State’s witness, testified that the respondent took a bottle of whiskey from his pocket and *315gave him a drink. It was the theory of the defence, and the testimony of the respondent when he took the stand, that the respondent had no liquor with him, and that Mahoney was the one who produced the whiskey and did the giving. Respondent’s counsel undertook in his cross-examination of Mahoney to get some admissions in line with this theory, but the State’s attorney objected to his inquiries on the ground that th§ witness was entitled to protection, and the court excluded the testimony as evidence that would tend to incriminate the witness. The witness made no claim of privilege.

It is not necessary to inquire what the situation would have been if the witness had claimed the privilege of silence on the ground that his answers would tend to criminate him. The respondent was entitled to the benefit of the proposed examination if the witness was willing to answer, even if there were legal grounds on which the witness might have refused to answer. The privilege, if it existed, was strictly personal, and could be asserted by no one but the witness. The court might properly have instructed the witness as to his privilege, but could not exclude evidence material to the defence for the protection of the witness unless the witness claimed protection. No claim of privilege having been made by the witness, the exclusion of the testimony was error.

*Exceptions*sustained, *judgment and sentence reversed and cause remanded.*
Editorial Note on Part 105
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 105 appear at 70 FR 56087, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 105.40 Designated agents for non-residents. ( a ) *General requirement.* If you are not a resident of the United States but are required by this subchapter or subchapter C of this chapter to designate a permanent resident of the United States to act as your agent and receive documents on your behalf, you must prepare a designation and file it with us.
( b ) *Agents.* An agent, also known as “agent for service of process”: ( 1 ) May be an individual, a firm, or a domestic corporation.
( 2 ) May represent any number of principals.
( 3 ) May not reassign responsibilities under a designation to another person.
( c ) *Preparing a designation.* Your designation must be written and dated, and it must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The section in the HMR that requires you to file a designation.
( 2 ) A certification that the designation is in the correct legal form required to make it valid and binding on you under the laws, corporate bylaws, and other requirements that apply to designations at the time and place you are making the designation.
( 3 ) Your full legal name, the principal name of your business, and your mailing address.
( 4 ) A statement that your designation will remain in effect until you withdraw or replace it.
( 5 ) The legal name and mailing address of your agent.
( 6 ) A declaration of acceptance signed by your agent.
( d ) Each designation must be submitted to: Approvals and Permits Division, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Attn: PHH-30, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001 or by electronic mail to: *specialpermits@dot.gov* or *approvals@dot.gov* as appropriate.
( e ) *Designations are binding.* You are bound by your designation of an agent, even if you did not follow all the requirements in this section, until we reject your designation.
[67 FR 42951, June 25, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 56088, Sept. 23, 2005; 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005; 72 FR 55682, Oct. 1, 2007; 75 FR 27211, May 14, 2010; 76 FR 56310, Sept. 13, 2011; 78 FR 15321, Mar. 11, 2013]
§ 535.705 Application for waiver. ( a ) Upon a showing of good cause, the Commission may waive any requirement of this subpart.
( b ) A request for such a waiver must be submitted and approved by the Commission in advance of the filing of the Monitoring Report or minutes to which the requested waiver would apply. Requests for a waiver shall be submitted in writing to the Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573-0001, and shall state and provide the following: ( 1 ) The specific requirements from which relief is sought;
( 2 ) The special circumstances requiring the requested relief;
( 3 ) Relevant trade and industry data and information to substantiate and support the special circumstances requiring the requested relief; and
( 4 ) Why granting the requested waiver will not substantially impair effective monitoring of the agreement.
( c ) The Commission may take into account the presence or absence of shipper complaints as well as the past compliance of the agreement parties with any reporting requirement under this part in considering an application for a waiver.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vyta Corp
for the year ended June 30, 2006, I, Kristi J. Kampmann, Chief Financial Officer
of  Vyta  Corp,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:

     (1)  such Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of Vyta Corp for the year ended
          June  30,  2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the information  contained  in  such  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of
          Vyta  Corp  for  the year ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.


                                        /s/Kristi  J.  Kampmann
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Kristi  J.  Kampmann,
                                          Chief  Financial  Officer


Date:     October  12,  2006


     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Vyta Corp and will be retained by Vyta Corp and furnished to
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending August 6, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us