alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,419                  49,419
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        16,278                  16,278
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,697)                (65,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,240                   1,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,240)                 (1,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.00)                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
§ 272.31 Determination of penalty. Operators whose Eligible Vessels have undergone foreign repairs, which MARAD determines are non-emergency in nature, may be subject to a penalty in an amount equal to the total cost (exclusive of applicable U.S. Customs duties) of such foreign repairs and purchases, such penalty to be effected by a deduction from the Operator's total ODS otherwise accrued. The Director, Office of Ship Operating Assistance, shall notify the Operator by letter with respect to: ( a ) MARAD's determination of a penalty and the reasons therefore; and
( b ) Whether the determination is final or subject to the submission of additional information.
98-1265.

#### State v. Irby.

Hamilton App. No. C-960908. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESS EE AT NASHVILLE Februar y 5, 2002 Se ssion
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WI LLIAM R. STEVENS

Appeal fr

om the Court of Cr

iminal Appea

ls Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 98-A-825 Steve Dozier, Judge

No. M1999-02067-SC-DDT-DD - Filed May 14, 2002

A DOLPHO A. B IRCH , J R ., J., concurring and dissenting.

I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the defendant’s c onvictions. With regard to the imposition o f the dea th penalt y in this ca se, however, I c annot agr ee. Repe ate dly, I have expressed grave concerns a bout the comparative proportionality review protocol employed by the majority to impose the death penalty. See, e.g. , State v. Chal mers , 28 S.W. 3d 913 (Tenn. 2000)(Bir ch, J., c oncurri ng and diss enting); State v. Keen , 31 S.W.3d 196 (Tenn. 2000)(Birch, J.,
concurr in g and di ssenting) ; State v. Carruthers and Montgomery , 35 S.W.3d 516 (Tenn. 2000)(Birch, J., conc urring a nd dissent

ing); State v. Sim s , 45 S.W.3d 1 (Ten n. 2001)(B irch, J., concurring and disse

nting); Terry v. State , 46 S.W.3d 147 (Tenn. 2001)(Birch, J., concurring and dissenting); State v. Stout , 46 S.W.3d 689 (Tenn. 2001)(Bir ch, J., c oncurri ng and diss enting); State
v. Bane , 57 S.W.3d 41 1 (Tenn. 2001)(Bir ch, J., c oncurri ng and diss enting); State v. Godsey , 60 S.W.3d 759 (Tenn. 2001)(Birch, J., concurring and dissenting ); State v. McKinney , ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tenn. 2002)(Birch, J., concurring and disse nting); Statev. Dellinger and Sutton , ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tenn. 2002)(Birch, J., conc urring a nd dissent ing); see also State v. Bland , 958 S.W.2d 651 (Tenn. 1 99 7)(Birch, J., concurring and dissenting). As detailed in my prior dissents, I do not believe the Courtis properly ful filling i ts statutor y obligatio n to deter

mine whet

her “the sentenc e of dea

th is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similarcases.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13- 206(c)(1)(D) (2001). Because I have not detected any meaningful effort to address a nd rectify my concerns, I respectfully dissent from the imposition of the penalty of death in this case

.

___________________________________ ADOLPHO

A. BIRCH, J

R., JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties IV Limited Partnership 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000702174
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          60,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         23,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,884
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.64<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 58.60-5 Industrial systems: Locations. An industrial system under this subpart must not be in a space that is— ( a ) Concealed; or
( b ) Inaccessible to industrial personnel.
Submitted on record and briefs September 13,

affirmed in part and remanded for resentencing on unlawful use of a firearm conviction; reversed and remanded for new trial on manslaughter conviction October 25, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RASHEID McCALLISTER, *Appellant.*

(C9212-37432; CA A81843)

904 P2d 202

Garrett A. Richardson, Multnomah Defenders, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Landau, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*427PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree, ORS 163.118, and the sentence on his conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was jointly indicted with Michael LeWayne Taylor and, after a joint trial, defendant and Taylor were found guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and unlawful use of a weapon. In Taylor’s appeal, we held that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence, and we also remanded the unlawful use of a weapon conviction for resentencing. *State v.*Taylor, 133 Or App 503, 892 P2d 697, *on recons*134 Or App 501, 895 P2d 357 (1995).

Defendant raises the same claims of error and the state concedes that the same holding should apply. We agree.

Conviction for unlawful use of a weapon affirmed and remanded for resentencing; conviction for manslaughter reversed and remanded for new trial.
§ 1104.10 Rejection of a deficient document. ( a ) The Board may reject a document, submitted for filing if the Board finds that the document does not comply with the rules.
( b ) The Board may either return the material unfiled or tentatively accept the material for filing and advise the person tendering it of the deficiency and require that the deficiency be corrected.
[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996]
§ 72.10-20 No means for locking door. ( a ) No means shall be provided for locking doors giving access to either of the 2 required means of escape, except that crash doors or locking devices, capable of being easily forced in an emergency, may be employed provided a permanent and conspicuous notice to this effect is attached to both sides of the door. This paragraph shall not apply to outside doors to deckhouses where such doors are locked by key only and such key is under the control of one of the vessel's officers.
( b ) [Reserved]
# L AW 

# O FFICE OF 

# J OHN 

# M IETUS
, LLC 6701 D EMOCRACY B OULEVARD , S UITE 300 B ETHESDA , MD 20817

- 7500

J OHN R. M IETUS , J R

. (202) 747

- 5212 (240) 396

- 5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

February 1 9 , 2014

Ms. Lauralyn Remo Ms. Vanessa Balgobin Air Carrier Fitness Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Orange Air, LLC , Docket s OST

- 2011

- 0073/0074

Dear Ms. Remo and Ms. Balgobin :
Orange Air respectfully requests that the Department again waive condition 9 of the certificate issued to it by Order 2011

- 11

- 31, condition 10 of the certificate issued by Order 2012

- 1

- 31 , and 14 C.F.R. 204.7 so as to extend, through April 30, 2014, the time within which Orange Air must commence actual flight operations in order to ma intain its interstate and foreign certificate authority. Pursuant to a waiver granted by letter dated December 6, 2013, t he se provisions currently require Orange Air to commence actual flight operations no later than February 28, 2014

. The certification process is nearly complete; however, the Federal Aviation Administration and Orange Air will not be able to complete the process by that date.
Since the last waiver was granted, Orange Air and the FAA have completed the Aircraft Confo rmity Process and, based on the availability of FAA resources, have scheduled Orange Air’s proving flights for March 3

- 14, 2014. With this important step scheduled, their goal is to complete FAA certification as soon as possible thereafter.

0F 1 Orange Air r emains eager to begin operations once the certification process is complete.

1 / Jeff Hipps and Charley Beers remain the local FAA project and frontline managers, respectively, and can be reached at (407) 812

- 3032 and 812

- 3020, respectively.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending July 17, 2010

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF MILLBROOK | * 18C          | Bank of Millbrook, Millbrook, New York, requests approval to merge with The Stissing National Bank of Pine Plains, Pine Plain, New York, pursuant to Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance. Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location         | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ADIRONDACK BK, UTICA, NEW YORK | 101671 | 08/24/2009 | 07/06/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 27, 2010

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|TOWER BANCORP INC. | * 3A5         | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/09/2010
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 04/09/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3148]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environment Response, Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA'')

    Notice is hereby given that on June 12, 2007, a proposed consent 
decree in United States v. NCH Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 
98-5268 (SDW) and United States v. FMC Corporation, et al., Civil 
Action No. 01-0476 (JCL), was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the District of New Jersey.
    In these actions the United States sought recovery of response 
costs pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, for costs incurred related 
to the Higgins Farm Superfund Site in Franklin Township, New Jersery 
and the Higgins Disposal Superfund Site in Kingston, New Jersey. The 
consent decree requires Lisbeth Higgins to pay $1,323,831.80 in 
reimbursement of the United States' past and future response costs at 
the Higgins Farm and Higgins Disposal Sites and place agricultural 
easements on the Higgins Farm and Higgins Disposal properties to 
preserve the properties exclusively for agricultural or conservation 
use.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the consent 
decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to 
[email protected] or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 2044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. NCH Corporation, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-
1486/1 or United States v. FMC Corportation, et al., D.J. Ref 
90-11-3-1486/2.
    The consent decree may be exaimed at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, 970 Broad Street, Suite 700, Newark, NJ 07102 (contact 
Susan Steele) and at U.S. EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New York, New 
York 10007-1866 (contact Deborah Schwenk). During the public comment 
period, the consent decree may also be examined on the following 
Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decree.html. A copy of the consent decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request 
to Tonia Fleetwood ([email protected]), fax no. (202) 514-0097, 
phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the 
Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $14.25 
(25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, 
if by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent 
Decree Library at the stated address.

Ronald G. Gluck,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 07-3148 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*James Slattery, *Appellants, v.*The Commissioners of the Department of Fire and Buildings of the City of Brooklyn, *Respondents*.

Order affirming proceedings of commissioners and dismissing writ of *certiorari*reversed, with costs, and relator restored. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES LOSSIA, JR. and

ALEXANDRA PLAPCIANU,

individually and on behalf of

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 15-12540

vs.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.,

a/k/a FLAGSTAR BANK,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER THEREBY REQUIRING DISCOVERY

ON AMENDED INDIVIDUAL BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM [DOC. 26]

Plaintiffs James Lossia Jr. and Alexandra Plapcianu filed objections to the

magistrate judge’s order granting in part and denying in part defendant’s motion for

protective order and denying plaintiffs’ cross-motion to compel discovery. The court

held a telephone conference with the parties regarding this motion on March 22, 2016.

Now, therefore, the court grants plaintiffs’ objections to the magistrate judge’s order. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s order compelling discovery

on the individual claims applies to plaintiffs’ amended breach of contract claim which

was filed after the magistrate judge’s order was entered. 

It is so ordered.

Dated: March 30, 2016

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:15-cv-12540-GCS-DRG Doc # 29 Filed 03/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1235
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

March 30, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

 

 

2:15-cv-12540-GCS-DRG Doc # 29 Filed 03/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1236
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending November 6, 2010

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BIGFORK BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5         | Bigfork Bancshares, Inc., Bigfork, Minnesota, to acquire 100 percent of Kelliher Bancshares Inc., Kelliher, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens State Bank of Kelliher, Kelliher, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/29/2010
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | 11/29/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us