alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending November 7, 2009

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                              
|-------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK                | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1720 South University, Little Rock, Arkansas.                                                                      | Newspaper:11/11/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 11/11/2009    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable
|BANK OF FAYETTE COUNTY THE | * Branch       | The Bank of Fayette County, Moscow, Tennessee, to establish a branch facility to be located at 574 Mulberry, Selmer, Tennessee.                                                                         | Newspaper:11/12/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 11/12/2009    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable
|PORTER BANCORP, INC.       | * 3A3          | Porter Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky, to acquire 100 percent of Citizens First Corporation, Bowling Green, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens First Bank, Bowling Green, Kentucky. | Newspaper:11/29/2009Federal Register:11/30/2009    
|Newspaper:                 | 11/29/2009    
|Federal Register:          | 11/30/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Load Range

Percent RMA OE and Replacement 

Shipments for Year 2008 

Medium & Wide Base Truck Tires

F 5% 

G 64% 

H 23% 

J 3% 

L 5% 

M & N Less than 1%
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00004-CV

BILLIE MURPHY TREMBLE, SHARON TREMBLE DONALDSON, 

SELIA TREMBLE SHAWKEY, WILMER FORREST TREMBLE, JR., 

THE ESTATE OF WILMER FORREST TREMBLE, SR., Appellants

V.

LUMINANT MINING COMPANY LLC, 

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES, Appellees

On Appeal from the 4th District Court

Rusk County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-390

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

On May 28, 2015, we suspended and abated this appeal pursuant to Rule 8.2 of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure after receiving notice that Appellee Luminant Mining Company 

LLC (Luminant) had voluntarily filed a bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court 

for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). Luminant has moved to reinstate this appeal

after obtaining an order from the Bankruptcy Court lifting the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay, 

to the extent it applied, and otherwise granting its permission for the appeal to proceed. Luminant 

attached a copy of the Bankruptcy Court’s order to its motion.

We (1) find that Luminant has satisfied the conditions precedent to reinstatement 

established by Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, (2) grant Luminant’s motion

to reinstate this appeal, and (3) reinstate the appeal on our docket. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2, 8.3. 

The appellants’ brief, which was received, but not filed, prior to the suspension of this appeal, will 

be filed on the same date as, but after, this order is issued. The appellee’s brief is due thirty days 

from the date of this order, or on or before November 30, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 27, 2015
Exhibit 12.1

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                          |  |                |   |  |         |   |  |       |  |       |  |       
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ----- |  | ----- |  | ------
|                                          |  | Fiscal Year   
|                                          |  | 2002           |   |  | 2003    |   |  | 2004  |  | 2005  |  | 2006  
|                                          |  | (in thousands)
|Total earnings (losses) and fixed charges |  | (28,706        | ) |  | (11,156 | ) |  | 1,316 |  | 6,769 |  | 14,565
|Fixed charges                             |  | 2,103          |   |  | 731     |   |  | 1,653 |  | 3,749 |  | 4,860 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)    |  | n/a            |   |  | n/a     |   |  | n/a   |  | 1.81  |  | 3.00  



|(1) | For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, total earnings consist of pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before adjustment for minority interests
in consolidated subsidiaries and loss from equity investees plus fixed charges minus minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense,
amortization of debt issuance costs and that portion of rent expense that we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges by $30.8 million, $11.9 million and $0.3 million for the fiscal years 2002,
2003 and 2004, respectively.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the filing by Santeon Group, Inc. (the "Company") of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.
  Date: March 26, 2012
 /s/ Ashraf M. RofailName:  Ashraf M. RofailTitle:  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
March 10, 2015

Mr. Christian Amico 1985 Riviera Drive, 103 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464

Dear Mr. Amico:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we cannot proce ss your request and what you s hould do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your March 5, 2015, exemption re quest into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 0557), but we are unable to proces s your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, March 13, 1995 (43), Para 43.6 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 375]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.43.6  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. CLINGER: Committee of Conference. Conference report on 
     S. 1. An act to curb the practice of imposing unfunded 
     Federal mandates on States and local governments; to 
     strengthen the partnership between the Federal Government and 
     State, local and tribal governments; to end the imposition, 
     in the absence of full consideration by Congress, of Federal 
     mandates on State, local, and tribal governments without 
     adequate funding, in a manner that may displace other 
     essential governmental priorities; and to ensure that the 
     Federal Government pays the costs incurred by those 
     governments in complying with certain requirements under 
     Federal statutes and regulations; and for other purposes 
     (Rept. No. 104-76). Ordered to be printed.
```
#### In the Matter of the Will of David Hendricks, *Deceased*.

Decree of surrogate admitting will to probate affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 17, 1995 (68), Para 68.4 Order of Business--Consideration of S.4]
[Page 749]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.68.4  order of business--consideration of s.4

  On motion of Mr. CLINGER, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That it may be in order hereafter to consider in the House a 
motion to take from the Speaker's table the bill of the Senate (S. 4) to 
grant the power to the President to reduce budget authority, and for 
other purposes, to strike all after the enacting clause of the Senate 
bill, and to insert the text of H.R. 2, as passed by the House; that the 
motion be debatable for not to exceed one hour, to be equally divided 
and controlled among the Chairman and Ranking Minority Members of the 
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and the Committee on Rules; 
and that the previous question be ordered on the motion to final 
adoption without intervening motion except for one motion to commit.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending July 2, 2011

|Filer                            | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FNB HOLDCO, INC.                 | * 3A1          | FNB Holdco, Inc., to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Flowers National Bank, both in Cainsville, Missouri. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                       | Not available 
|Federal Register:                | Not available 
|UNION STATE BANK OF EVEREST, THE | * 18C* Branch  | The Union State Bank of Everest, Everest, Kansas, to merge with The Bank of McLouth, McLouth, Kansas, and incident thereto, to establish a branch.                     | Newspaper:07/16/2011Federal Register:Not applicable  
|Newspaper:                       | 07/16/2011    
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1.   | The                Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June                30,                2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the                "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operation                of the                Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**In      Witness Whereof**

| /s/Henry                R.CarabelliHenry                R. CarabelliPresident                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending May 1, 2010

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF ERATH HOLDING COMPANY | 3A1            | Bank of Erath Holding Company, notice to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Bank of Erath, both of Erath, Louisiana. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | Not applicable
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.25 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 700]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.25  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. ARCHER: Committee on Ways and Means. H.R. 1590. A bill 
     to require the Trustees of the Medicare trust funds to report 
     recommendations on resolving projected financial imbalance in 
     Medicare trust funds (Rept. No. 104-119, Pt. 1). Ordered to 
     be printed.
       Mr. KASICH: Committee on the Budget. House Concurrent 
     Resolution 67. Resolution setting forth the congressional 
     budget for the U.S. Government for fiscal years, 1996, 1997, 
     1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 (Rept. No. 104-120). 
     Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union.
```
§ 95.05-3 Sample extraction smoke detection systems. ( a ) For vessels contracted for on or after January 18, 2017, a sample extraction smoke detection system must be installed in accordance with chapter 10 of the FSS Code (incorporated by reference, see § 95.01-2).
( b ) Periodically, the FSS Code defers to “the Administration.” For U.S. flag vessels, “the Administration” is the United States Coast Guard. The following requirements are provided for the provisions of Chapter 10 that defer to the Administration: ( 1 ) For sequential scanning systems under FSS Code, chapter 10, paragraph 2.1.2, a satisfactory overall response time will be achieved by limiting the maximum allowable interval to 2 minutes.
( 2 ) Under the FSS Code, chapter 10, paragraph 2.2.2, fans of sufficient capacity to provide a satisfactory overall response time will signal an alarm within 3 minutes upon introduction of smoke at the most remote accumulator on a vehicle deck and within 5 minutes upon introduction of smoke at the most remote accumulator in container and general cargo holds.
( 3 ) Means provided to isolate smoke accumulators from liquid or refrigerated cargoes must be to the satisfaction of the Commanding Officer of the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center.
( 4 ) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in FSS Code chapter 10, periodic testing of sample extraction smoke detection systems must be conducted as part of the annual inspection and include inspection of all piping, valves, controls and alarms, and by introduction of smoke into the accumulators.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48263, July 22, 2016]
#### § 1104.6 Timely filing required.

Documents must be received for filing at the Board's offices in Washington, DC within the time limits set for filing. The date of receipt at the Board, and not the date of deposit in the mail, determines the timeliness of filing. However, if a document is mailed by United States express mail, postmarked at least one day prior to the due date, it will be accepted as timely. Other express mail, received by the private express mail carrier at least one day prior to the due date, also will be accepted as timely filed. The term express mail means that the carrier or delivery service offers next day delivery to Washington, DC. If the e-filing option is chosen (for those pleadings and documents that are appropriate for e-filing, as determined by reference to the information on the Board's Web site), then the e-filed pleading or document is timely filed if the e-filing process is completed before 11:59 p.m. eastern time on the due date.

[47 FR 49554, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996; 69 FR 18499, Apr. 8, 2004; 81 FR 8853, Feb. 23, 2016]
#### § 72.25-15 Passenger accommodations for excursion boats, ferryboats, and passenger barges.

(a) Except as specifically excluded by this section, separate public toilet spaces shall be provided for male and female passengers with at least the minimum equipment in each based upon the number of passengers permitted to be carried as set forth in table [72.25-15(a)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-72.25-15#p-72.25-15(a)).

Table [72.25-15](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-72.25-15)(a)

| Number of passengers | | Toilets | Washbasins |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Over | Not over |
| | 100 | 1 | 1 |
| 100 | 300 | 2 | 1 |
| 300 | 500 | 3 | 2 |
| 500 | 1,000 | 4 | 2 |
| 1,000 | 1,500 | 5 | 3 |
| 1,500 | 2,000 | 6 | 3 |
| 2,000 | 2,500 | 7 | 4 |
| 2,500 | 3,000 | 8 | 4 |
| 3,000 | 3,500 | 9 | 5 |
| 3,500 | 4,000 | 10 | 5 |
| 4,000 | | (1) | (1) |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Additional facilities by extrapolation. | | | |

(b) In the men's spaces, urinals may be substituted for toilets, provided at least one-half the required toilets are fitted.

(c) On ferryboats and barges having a short run, passenger toilet facilities need not be fitted.