February 22, 2015

Attn:

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Mark S. Foster

REQUEST S AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE

OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 9 1.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) &

(a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom

3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Mark S. Foster

532 Cromwell Ct.

Culpeper, VA 22701

540

- 718

- 0804

M sfcc0 1@msn.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS............................................ .......................................3

SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... .....4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER........................................... .........4

BACKGROUND................................................................................................................... .4

BASIS FOR PETITION.........................................................................................................5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.........................................................................6

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 1 4 C.F.R. FROM WHICH Mark S. FosterSEEKS EXEMPTION............................................................................................................7

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF Mark S. Foster SEEKS AND THE REASON Mark S. Foster

SEE KS THE RELIEF..............................................................10

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING Mark S. Foster ’ s REQUEST WOULD BE

IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ............................................................................................12

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION TO Mark S. Foster

WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY..............................................................14

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER...................25

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMAT ION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO

SUPPORT M ARK S. FOSTER’S REQUEST..................................................25

CONCLUSION................................................................................................................... ..2 5

APPENDICES......................................................................................... 26

3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

F AA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace SystemNOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Ve rtical Takeoff and Landing

4

SUMMARY

Mark Stuart Foster, hereafter referred to as “Mark ” , or “ Mark S. Foster ”

, seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F .R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a )(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) pur suant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Mark to operate an Unmanned Aircraft Syst em (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, residential and commercial real estate, civil landscapes and events over certain areas of the
United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Mark has for over tw e nty

- five years provided his clients (which include

private sector businesses and non

- profits, with expertise and knowledge construction, building, consulting, management and process control.

The objective of Mark and my Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) aerial operations is to provide a more affo rdable, high

- quality production system for a variety of govern mental, commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting

• Construction sites before and after

• Appraisals• Real

- estate marketing

• Economic development

• Civic landmarks

• Spe cial event coverage

• Private and governmental training

Mark has safely flown small RC electric quadcopters recreationally for approximately 2 years

without incident.

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3, UAS

Mark seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 system for

compensation or hire within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is vertical takeoff and landing

(VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic

tablet or smart phone systems. Th e DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of

approximately 2.8 lb. while having a diagonal dimension of 23.2”, a maximum speed of

approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying height of 400'. The DJI Phantom 3 is equipped

with four main rotors; driven by Li thium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

5

The DJI Phantom 3 that will be operated by Mark is registered in

accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft

Registration, and mark ed in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration

Marking.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Mark S. Foster , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA),

Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the

Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 3, UAS in the National Air space System

(NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a),91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operati ng area associated with the

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Mark ’s operation of DJI Phantom 3

UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21 , Subpart H.

Accordingly, Mark requests relief from Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements

for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness ce rtificate.

Mark submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent

level of safety will be ensured. Mark will use experienced personnel or

technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive mainten ance on the UAS using the

methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Ins truction Manual). Furthermore, Mark

will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges

and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested Mark to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in

Command (PIC) h olding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as

well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom UAS in a

manner consiste nt with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Mark seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft

airworthiness, because t he DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in

accordance with 14 C.F.R . Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Mark submits

that they will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition, prior to every

flight, by determining that the UAS are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e.,

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in acondition for safe flight.

6

Mark also seeks an exemp tion from the requirements of Section 91.121,

entitled Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a typical barometric

altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to

the PIC via Global Position ing System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry

data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This

altitude information, combined with Mark ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS wi thin visual line of sight, at or below 400 f eet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section
91.121.

Additionally, I, Mark S. Foster seek an exe mption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. I, Mark S. Foster, submit that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual fli ght rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approxim ately 23 minutes. Battery power indicators are also able to show exactly how much battery power is left, as well

as how much time is needed to return safely back to point of take off.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, I, Mark, will provide the following

information in support of its petition for exemption: A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

Mark S. Foster

532 Cromwell Ct.

Culpeper, VA 22701

540

- 718

- 0804

m sfcc0 1@msn.com

Mark S. Foster Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection

(b) , states the following:(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the

first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that

for at least 20 minutes.

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person ap proving the aircraft

for return to service.

(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and

each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller,

rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which

are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The curre nt inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the

last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft

and its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety

directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety

directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves

recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each

major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors,

propellers, and appliances.

10

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods

prescribed:

(1) The records specifi ed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained untilthe work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is

performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of

this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is

approved for return to service.

C. The Exten t Of Relief Mark S. Foster Seeks And The Reason Mark S. Foster Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief Mark S. Foster Seeks And The Reason Mark S. Foster Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b). Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges

and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a

private pilot or higher

level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medica l certificate, and who has met

certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for

compensation or hire.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a

private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any

business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, Mark S. Foster submits that an equivalent level of

safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS

unless that PIC has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirement s, demonstrating that the

PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the

operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency

maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate dis tances from people, vessels, vehicles and

structures.

Further, Mark S. Foster submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS,conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to Mark S.

Foster ’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or

hire.

11

2. Extent Of Relief Mark S. Foster Seeks And The Reason Mark S. Foster Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworth iness, is requested to the extent

required to allow Mark S. Foster to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in

airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the

operating documents (i.e., Mark S. Foster ’s Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual).

Mark S. Foster seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not

require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore,

Mark S. Foster will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy

condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly M aintenance

Log, and DJI Phantom 3) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in

condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief Mark S. Foster Seeks And The Reason Mark S. Foster Seeks Relief From
Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight

operations of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS

equipment, and a radio communicatio ns telemetry data link to downlink altitude information

from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any

altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet

above ground level (AGL), Mark S. Foster seeks the requested relief because the

DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local

barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight.

Considering the limited alti tude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is soughtto the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As

more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the D JI

Phantom 3 UAS are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which

automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight,

and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the he ads

- up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief Mark S. Foster Seeks And The Reason Mark S. Foster Seeks Relief From

Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is

requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules

(VFR), for a total duration of 23 minutes. Mark S. Foster seeks the requested

relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the

12

battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video

or still photo flight operations that Mark S. Foster proposes to conduct pursuant

to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, the DJI

Phantom 3 operating documents, and Mark S. Foster ’s proposed operating

limitations, ensure that The Mark S. Foster will safely operate the battery powered

DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under

visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief Mark S. Foster Seeks And The Reason Mark S. Foster Seeks Relief From

Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407 (a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Mark S. Foster requests relief from

these Sections because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require airworthiness certificates. As set

forth mor e fully below, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 foroperation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Mark S. Foster will

use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the

UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents

(i.e., Mark S. Foster Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log,

and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Mark S. Foster will

document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

D. The Reasons Why Granting Mark S. Foster ’s Request Would Be In The

Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Mark S. Foster to safely,

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of

construction sites, real estate, events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States.

Additionall y, use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce

pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Mark S.

Foster ’ s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized without

implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain ae rial imagery. By reducing the

13

amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use

of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise

and air pollution, as well as increa se the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion

around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3

UAS do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft

conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be

handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases offlight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated

during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power

and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable

environment ally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine

aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately

20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS, while reducing the

carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled

by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisiti ons, the substantial risk to life and

property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft

flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of

flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS (weighing

approximately 2.8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal dimension of 23.2

inches, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and

property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct

similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42

feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Pe rforming Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 UAS

Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are also an economical

alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial opera tions. As such, operation of

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will allow United States citizens like Mark S. Foster , to remain

competitive and contribute to growth of the U .S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of

aviation fuel and the Environ mental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatoryactions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new

and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI

Phantom 3 UAS is one such t echnology that not only allows companies greater operational

flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high

operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, persons such as Mark, can remain competitive and

profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will

ultimately contribute to growth of the U

. S. economy. Improv ed financial performance of U.S.

companies, thr ough commercial use of th e DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that

increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax

revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain

competitive both in t he United States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades,

Mark ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not

implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in

compliance with operating documents (i.e., Mark S. Foster ’s Aerial Operations

Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) which requires

property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance

with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14

C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Advers ely Affect Safety, Or

How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided

By The Rule From Which Mark S. Foster Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Meet The Conditions Of The FAA

Modernization and Refo rm Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with theunmanned aircraft and its operation, Mark S. Foster operation of the DJI

Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Secti on 333, and will not require an airworthiness

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets

forth requirements for considering whether a UAS wil l create a hazard to users of the NAS or the

public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the

following, in part:

(a) In General.

-- Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later

than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation

shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the

national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by

section 332 o f this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

15

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

--
(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size,

weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated

areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users

of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national

security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or

airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States

Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified

under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

-- If the Secretary determines under this section

that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace

system, the S ecretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of suchaircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Mark submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS

can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Sectio n 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the

characteristics of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the

specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.

The DJI P hantom 3 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise

pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

The technical sp ecifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User

Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS To Remain

Wit hin A Defined Operational Area. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning flight modes. A

complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided

at pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual attached hereto as Appendix A.

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point

Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3

seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the D JI Phantom 3 UAS does not reacquire control link data

from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the will return to the home

position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown.

16

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth at

pages 12 through 14 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 GCS a nd Its ’ Operation.

A complete description of the opera tion and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 GCS and flightcontrol software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual. DJI

Phantom 3 User Manual is attached hereto as Appendix A.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Is Limit ed To The Line Of Sight Of A

Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.

Mark S. Foster ’ s video production staff, comprising of only himself, to act as a pilot in

command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assis t him at all

times during flight time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating

Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, Mark proposes to commercially operate DJI

Phantom 3 UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain

areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following

aircraft described in the operat ing documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55

pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to

amend this grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for

the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground le vel

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a

special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be

in feet AGL.

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all

times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device

other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medicalcertificate

.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not

permitted.

17

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy

the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO

and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or

texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before

the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the fli ght. The

PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating

documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructi ons and is not

permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during

UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a

discrepancy exists between the co nditions and limitations contained in the grant of

exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and

limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed.

Otherwise, the operator must follo w the procedures as outlined in its operating

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised

documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated

and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of

exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the

basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for

amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80)may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating

documents

. 10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition

for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of

the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary mai ntenance has

been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground

Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and

alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component,

must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight

must make an ent ry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant

sections of the operating documents.

13. The operator must follow t he UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component,

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

18

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping

requirements, in accordance with the operating docum ents. Maintenance, inspection,

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the

aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished,

and the signature of the authorized person returning th e UAS to service.

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer

Safety Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective

action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third class

medical certificate.

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the

operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the

UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption,

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances

from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be

logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of

training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption.

However, tra ining operations may only be conducted during dedicated training

sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not

essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must

operate the UA with a ppropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14

C.F.R. § 91.119.

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1.

All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If

flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to

proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not

authorized.

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference poi nt as

denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement

with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in

accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of

agreement with t he airport management must be made available to the Administrator

upon request.

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.22. If t he UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined

location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in

accordance with the operating documents.

19

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies

in accordance with the operating documents.

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and

forecast weather conditions) there is enough p ower to fly at normal cruising speed to

the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the

operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance wit h airspace requirements

in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential

transponder requirements.

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. par t 47, and have identification ( Number)

markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must

be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation

and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission

(FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available

to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the U AS any time the UAS is operating.

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law

enforcement official upon request.29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation

operations and activities at all time s.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating

persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons),

vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator

must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under su ch protection. If a

situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are

within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the

owner/c ontroller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission

and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to

those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

20

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do

not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission

from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each

flight to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational are a as defined by the applicable COA must be reported

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.2 . Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b)

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Mark submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section

61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC wi ll be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom

3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner

consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Considering Mark ’s proposed area of operations, and the operating

limitations set forth

- above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge

requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the

airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Mark s ubmits that the

additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not

correlate to the ai rmanship skills neces sary for Mark ’s specific proposed flight operations.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150,

11153, 11156, 11158, 11 159, 11160, 11161).

Mark S. Foster will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless

that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3

UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is abl e to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3

UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers

and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. §

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those

21 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations

u nder the exempt ion). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffsand landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was

obtained in compliance w ith applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety

during Mark ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that

prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations

would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the

purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated

and logged, in a manner consiste nt with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a

UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor

UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have

accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make

and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the

FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e.

5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi

- rotor time and the

10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the

hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90

days (for currency purpose s). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- hour

requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in

the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also

finds that prior documen ted flight experience that was obtained in compliance with

applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and

experience

- building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to

accomplish the required flight ti me. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building

flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance

with 14 C.F.R 91.119.

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.Accordingly, Mark will ensure safe opera tions by not allowing any PIC

to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum

flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3

UAS in a manner consistent with the exemptio n, including evasive and emergency maneuvers

and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not

Adversely Affect Safety.

22

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to

every flight, Mark S. Foster will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an

airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating doc uments and as

stated in the conditions and limitations herein.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

1106 2, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150,

11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not

Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent l evel of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment

and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS f or

active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with

Mark ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet

AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Sec tion 91.121. The altitude information will be

generated by GPS equipment installed onbo ard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude

initiation point is automatically establis hed by the UAS at ground level. The FAA has previously

granted relief f

rom Section 91.121 sp ecific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all materialrespects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063,

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157,

11158, 11159, 11 160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not

Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R.

Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the te chnical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (2)

the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight

operations. Accordingly, Mark will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI

Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a

total duration of 23 minutes.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; the

limitations on the p roposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will

ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore,

safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings t o the PIC

at the GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at

approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery

power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land

automatically.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the

UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the

minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650.

Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in

circumst ances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110,

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).6. Reas ons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely

Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, Mark submi ts that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the

regulatory maintenance and alterat ion requirements established by Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.4 17(a) & (b) will be met because Mark will use

trained technicians to perform maintenance, alte rations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS

using the methods, techn iques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e ., Mark S.

Foster ’ s Aerial Operation s Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction

Manual). Furtherm ore, Mark will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI

Phantom 3 UAS.

Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescrib ed by the operating documents, Mark

will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and

91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are

attached hereto as Appendix A and B; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is

attached hereto as Appendix C.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Mark will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the

methods, tec hniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents.

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS

will be p erformed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained

utilizing the monthly maintenance log.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely

affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.

24In consideration of Mark ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating

documents, and the tec hnical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Mark S. Foster submits that

safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously

granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those

presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080,

11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160,

11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Mar k requests that

the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS,

which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of

safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a)

& (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a)

& (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of

conducting aerial video and phot ography over certain areas of the United States for

compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a

UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national

security; an d further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness

certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation

of the UAS in the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special condi tions pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

§ 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14

C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or

unusual design features of the aircraft. Sect ion 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the

following:If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller

because of a novel o r unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller,

he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special

conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to

establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may
prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS,

which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of

safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections

25

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and

91.417(a) & (b).

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The

Rules From Which Mark S. Foster Seeks Exemption:

Mark S. Foster seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R

Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Descript ion Of The Nature Of The Exemption Mark

Seeks:

This exemption will permit Mark to commercially operate an

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and

photography over certain area s of the United States.

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Mark ’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary o f Transportation to determine if certain UAS

may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Mark ’s request for exemption

may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set

forth above.

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a

hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and

further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification.

As discussed in detail above, Mark will operate the DJI Phantom 3

UAS safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or

otherwise pose a threat to national security.

CONCLUSION :

As set forth herein, Mark seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §

11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will

permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness

certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas

of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the

Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act o f 2012, while also

advancing the interests of the public, by allowing Mark to safely, efficiently, and economically

operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS.

26

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulatio ns and the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333 , Mark S. Foster respectfully

requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14

C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b) , 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI Phantom

3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain

areas of the United States.Dated: February 22

, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

Mark S. Foster

532 Cromwell Ct.

Culpeper, VA 22701

540

- 718

- 0804

M sfcc0 1@msn.com

Appendices:

A

– Link to DJI Phantom 3 Manual: Click on link b elow

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_M anual_v1.2_en.pdf

27