alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 26, 2010

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|Standard Financial Corp. | * 3A1         | Standard Financial Corp., Murrysville, Pennsylvania, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting shares of Standard Bank, PaSB, Murrysville, Pennsylvania | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/19/2010
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | 07/19/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|OTTOVILLE BK CO, OTTOVILLE, OHIO | 443625 | 03/15/2010 | 06/16/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending December 19, 2009

|Filer                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANCO DE SABADELL, S.A. | 4c8            | Banco de Sabadell, S.A., Sabadell, Spain, to engage de novo in securities brokerage and riskless-principal activities, through its newly-established subsidiary, Sabadell Securities USA, Inc., Miami, Florida. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:01/05/2010
|Newspaper:              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:       | 01/05/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending January 2, 2010

|Filer                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST NIAGARA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | * 3A1         | First Niagara Financial Group, Inc., Buffalo, New York, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Harleysville National Corporation and Harleysville National Bank and Trust Company, both of Harleysville, Pennsylvania. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                   | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Closed Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Space Industrial Base 
will meet in closed session on January 30-31, 2007; at Science 
Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA. This meeting is to assess the future direction of space 
requirements and identify the industrial base to meet the Nation's 
future requirements.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess the health 
of the U.S. space industrial base and determine if there is any adverse 
impact from export controls, in particular, on the health of lower-tier 
contractors; anticipate future space requirements and the shape of the 
space industrial base required to achieve the anticipated capabilities; 
and recommend improvements to current policies and processes, where 
applicable, while also identifying policies and processes that can 
shape the space industrial base to deliver future capabilities.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#284b44414e5c474606584041444441585b68475b4c06454144"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0566696c63716a6b2b756d6c69696c7576456a76612b686c69">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.
    Due to scheduling and work burden difficulties, there is 
insufficient time to provide timely notice required by Section 10(a) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 102-3.150(b) of the 
GSA Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR part 
102-3.150(b), which further requires publication at least 15 calendar 
days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: January 18, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-276 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2003-1427, 2008-1378, -1400

ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON,

and FINK & JOHNSON,

Sanctioned Parties-Appellants,

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Florida in case no. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Alexander S. Orenshteyn moves for leave to file dictionary excerpts as a

supplemental appendix, with the two excerpts attached to his motion as Exhibits A and

B. Citrix Systems, Inc. opposes. The court considers whether to treat Orenshteyn's

submission as a motion for judicial notice.

Because the dictionary excerpts were not before the district court, they are not

part of the record on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(a). Nevertheless, we conclude
that the dictionary excerpts may be judicially noticed. However, the relevance of the

materials is left to the discretion of the merits panel.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted to the extent that the court takes judicial notice of

the dictionary excerpts.

A copy of Exhibits A and B of Orenshteyn's motion and this order shall be

transmitted to the merits panel assigned to decide this case.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 18 2009	

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Alexander S. Orenshteyn

Douglas J. Kline, Esq.

David Fink, Esq.

s17

06VRTP§1 LS F

THE EDERAlitUIT OR

MAY 18 2009

.11th i1ORwj

CLERK

2003-1427 et al.	2
§ 76.15-50 Lockout valves. ( a ) A lockout valve must be provided on any carbon dioxide extinguishing system protecting a space over 6,000 cubic feet in volume and installed or altered after July 9, 2013. “Altered” means modified or refurbished beyond the maintenance required by the manufacturer's design, installation, operation and maintenance manual.
( b ) The lockout valve must be a manually operated valve located in the discharge manifold prior to the stop valve or selector valves. When in the closed position, the lockout valve must provide complete isolation of the system from the protected space or spaces, making it impossible for carbon dioxide to discharge in the event of equipment failure during maintenance.
( c ) The lockout valve design or locking mechanism must make it obvious whether the valve is open or closed.
( d ) A valve is considered a lockout valve if it has a hasp or other means of attachment to which, or through which, a lock can be affixed, or it has a locking mechanism built into it.
( e ) The master or person-in-charge must ensure that the valve is locked open at all times, except while maintenance is being performed on the extinguishing system, when the valve must be locked in the closed position.
( f ) Lockout valves added to existing systems must be approved by the Commandant as part of the installed system.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33876, June 7, 2012]
§ 1016.105 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award, it must have stood in an adversary relationship to the position taken by agency counsel, and it must have prevailed on one or more of the issues raised by agency counsel. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(B). The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in Subpart B.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2 million at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated;
( 2 ) Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization whose net worth does not exceed $7 million and which had no more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated;
( 3 ) Any organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)), may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association.
( c ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis. Independent contractors under lease to motor carriers are not employees of the carriers under these rules. Also, agents for motor common carriers of household goods are not employees of their respective principal carriers.
( e ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant or any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest, will be considered an affiliate for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( f ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
[46 FR 61660, Dec. 18, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 26379, June 23, 1989; 81 FR 8851, Feb. 23, 2016]
#### § 95.30-1 Application.

Automatic sprinkler systems must comply with Chapter 25 of NFPA 13 (incorporated by reference, see § 95.01-2).

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48263, July 22, 2016]
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOVER SADDLERY, INC.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2008
    /s/  Stephen L. DayStephen L.  DayPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 1018.8 Subdivision of claims.

The Board shall consider a debtor's liability arising from a particular transaction or contract as a single claim in determining whether the claim is less than the monetary limitation for the purpose of compromising, suspending, or terminating action. A claim may not be subdivided to avoid the monetary limitation established by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a)(2) and § 1018.5 of this part.

[58 FR 7749, Feb. 9, 1993, as amended at 81 FR 8851, Feb. 23, 2016]
§ 1018.93 Notice requirement before offset. A request for reduction of an IRS tax refund will be made only after the Board makes a determination that an amount is owed and past-due and provides the debtor with 60 days written notice. The Board's notice of intention to collect by IRS tax refund offset (Notice of intent) will state: ( a ) The amount of the debt;
( b ) That unless the debt is repaid within 60 days from the date of the Board's Notice of Intent, the Board intends to collect the debt by requesting that the IRS reduce any amount payable to the debtor as Federal Income tax refunds an amount equal to amount of the debt including all accumulated interest and other charges;
( c ) That the debtor has the right to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past-due or legally enforceable; and
( d ) A mailing address for forwarding any written correspondence and a contact name and phone number for any questions.
##### 



Exhibit 10.36 COMPENSATION FOR OUTSIDE BOARD MEMBERS
(As approved by the Compensation Committee & Board 3/25/04) Proposed Attend in
    
    
    Attend byNow
    
    
    Person
    
    
    PhoneAnnual Retainer (Base)
    
    $
    15,000
    
    
    $
    15,000Committee Chairman (extra)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,500Committee Secretary (extra)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,500Regular Meeting Fee
    
    $
    1,000
    
    
    
    2,500
    
    
    $
    1,500Spec. Committee or Board mtg(if separate from regular BOD mtg)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,500
    
    
    
    500
 Options Granted Upon Joining BOD
    
    
    20,000Option Grants yearly thereafter
    
    
    10,000
 Total likely Board Compensation (calculated) Min
    
    
    MaxBase Retainer
    
    $
    15,000
    
    
    $
    15,000Committee Chairman or Secretary (extra)
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    2,500Meeting fees (4 to 6 x $2,500)
    
    
    10,000
    
    
    
    15,000Committee meetings (1 to 4 x $1,500)
    
    
    1,500
    
    
    
    6,000Special BOD or Committee Meetings (2)
    
    
    1,000
    
    
    
    3,000$
    27,500
    
    
    $
    41,500
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 68 FR 5576, Feb. 4, 2003.

§ 356.23 Restrictive loan covenants approved for use by lenders. ( a ) We approve the following standard loan covenants, which may restrict the activities of the borrower without the lender's consent and which may be included in loan agreements or other documents between an owner of a Fishing Industry Vessel and an unrelated lender that is using an approved Mortgage Trustee to hold the mortgage and debt instrument for the benefit of the lender and that is not exempted under § 356.19(d) from MARAD review of its loan and mortgage covenants, so long as the lender's consent is not unreasonably withheld: ( 1 ) Borrower cannot sell part or all of its assets;
( 2 ) Borrower cannot merge, consolidate, reorganize, dissolve, or liquidate;
( 3 ) Borrower cannot undertake new borrowing or contingent liabilities;
( 4 ) Borrower cannot insure, guaranty or become otherwise liable for debt obligations of any other entity, Person, etc.;
( 5 ) Borrower cannot Charter or lease a vessel that is collateral for the loan;
( 6 ) Borrower cannot incur liens, except any permitted liens that may be set forth in the loan or other financing documents;
( 7 ) Borrower must limit its investments to marketable investments guaranteed by the United States or a State, or commercial paper with the highest rating of a generally recognized rating service;
( 8 ) Borrower cannot make structural alterations or any other major alteration to the vessel;
( 9 ) Borrower, if in arrears in its debt obligations to the lender, cannot make dividend payments on its capital stock; and,
( 10 ) Borrower, if in arrears in its debt obligations to the lender, cannot make excessive contributions to pension plans, make payment of employee bonuses, or make excessive contributions to stock option plans, or provide other major fringe benefits in terms of dollar amount to its employees, officers, and directors, such as loans, etc.
( b ) The mortgage may not include covenants that allow the Mortgagee to operate the vessel except as provided for in § 356.25.
[65 FR 44877, July 19, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 5581, Feb. 4, 2003]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, April 4, 1995 (55), Para 55.25 Leave of Absence]
[Page 533]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.55.25  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. McDADE, for today;
  To Mr. TORRES, for today; and
  To Mr. RUSH, for April 3 and today.
  And then,
```