alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 71.50-17 Eligibility requirements for the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program for certain passenger vessels. ( a ) Your vessel may be eligible for the AHE Program if— ( 1 ) It is constructed of steel or aluminum;
( 2 ) It has an effective hull protection system;
( 3 ) It has operated exclusively in fresh water since its last drydock examination;
( 4 ) It operates in a reduced risk environment such as a river or the protected waters of a lake; and
( 5 ) It operates exclusively in shallow water or within 0.5 nautical miles from shore.
( b ) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (a), the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), will evaluate the following information when determining your vessel's eligibility for the AHE Program: ( 1 ) The overall condition of the vessel, based on its inspection history;
( 2 ) The vessel's history of hull casualties and hull-related deficiencies; and
( 3 ) The AHE Program application, as described in § 71.50-19 of this part.
( c ) When reviewing a vessel's eligibility for the AHE program, the OCMI may modify the standards given by paragraph (a)(5) of this section where it is considered safe and reasonable to do so. In making this determination, the OCMI will consider the vessel's overall condition, its history of safe operation, and any other factors that serve to mitigate overall safety risks.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21077, Apr. 29, 2002]
**Exhibit
      32.2**




***Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer***




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. 1350)





In
      connection with the quarterly report of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
      November 14, 2007




By
                /s/
                  John
                  BensonJohn Benson, Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
      separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 9, 2005





/s/ Teresa A. Herbert*

Teresa A. Herbert

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





25
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 124 (Thursday, June 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3169]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Confidentiality, 
Privacy, and Security Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 12th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security Workgroup 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: July 26, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/confidentiality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup Members will continue 
discussing the working hypothesis and evaluate the confidentiality, 
privacy, and security protections for participants in an electronic 
information exchange network at a local, state, regional, and 
nationwide level.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/cps_instruct.html.

    Dated: June 20, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-3169 Filed 6-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending May 23, 2009

|Filer                              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST AMERICA HOLDINGS CORPORATION | * 4c8         | First America Holdings Corporation, Osprey, Florida, to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding shares of MRCB Holdings, Inc., Palmetto, Florida, and thereby engage in operating a savings association. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/22/2009
|Newspaper:                         | Not available
|Federal Register:                  | 06/22/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|STERLING BK, LANTANA, FLORIDA | 147174 | 01/12/2009 | 05/07/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2009 (July 1, 2009 - September 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
CALL BY: 

CALL TO: David Enman

Organization: Nantero, Inc.

Date: 04/01/2015

Time: 10:00 AM

PMN: 15-0276 

Organization: 

Phone: 

Concerning what TSCA CBI?

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

Q1: Is there any point in the manufacturing/post-processing of the PMN 

where it is handled as a dry solid (not in dispersion or slurry)? | A1: 

The only point where raw nanotubes are handled are in the very first 

step of the process, where nanotubes are transferred in a glove box into 

liquid to make a dispersion [Note: the submission indicates that the 

raw materials in this step are for the raw nanotubes - not the final 

product].| //| Q2: Can you confirm that the spray coating enclosure 

described in Attachment 4 would be sufficient to prevent worker 

exposures?| A2: We currently do not use the spray coating process - we 

only use the spin coat, but wanted to have the option for spray coat. 

The coating process is contained in the "mini environment" under 

negative pressure, so all of the spray coating excess is expected to 

be pulled into the exhaust air. This is also necessary to maintain a 

uniform coating on the wafer. Also, the amount coated is very small - 3ml 

over a period of up to 60 seconds.
CALL BY: 

CALL TO: David Enman

Organization: Nantero, Inc.

Date: 03/27/2015

Time: 

PMN: 15-0276 

Organization: 

Phone: 

Concerning what TSCA CBI?

CBI: Yes

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

Q1: why are you claiming identical releases from the manufacturing sites 

that are not under your control.| A1: these sites will not be toll 

manufacturers but we will license the technolgoy to them and I think 

our agreement with them includes provisions related to the meida of 

release of wastes. This submission is similar to our previous 

submission.| | Q2: | A2: | | Q3: | A3: | | Q4: | A4:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-47760, 333-49363, 333-122186, 333-54060, 333-54062, 333-53982, 333-65694, 333-66650, 333-109043, 333-132523 and 333-132526 on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule of GSI Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-BasedPayment,” effective January 1, 2006) and our report dated March 11, 2007 relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GSICommerce, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2006. 

Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 11, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828186
<NAME> 88ALP.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         213,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               349,470
<PP&E>                                      10,059,560
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,287,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,121,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,060,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,121,722
<SALES>                                      1,195,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,207,369
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,541,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (334,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (334,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (334,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (25.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Lee, Arthur To: Heggs, Angela Subject: FW: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords Date: Monday, February 09, 2015 10:24:34 AM

-----Original Message----- From: Lee, Arthur Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 2:33 PM To: 'NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG' Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Mr. Nash The proposed rule requires extension cords within the scope of the rule to meet all applicable safety characteristics outlined in the proposed rule. The absence of any one of the characteristics would make the product a substantial product hazard. See 80 FR 5701. I hope this answers your question. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Arthur Lee US Consumer Product Safety Commission Directorate for Engineering Sciences Division of Electrical Engineering 5 Research Place Rockville, MD 20850 301 987-2008 alee@cpsc.gov

-----Original Message----- From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [ mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil ] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:30 PM To: Lee, Arthur Subject: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords Good morning, sir! I am seeking clarification to the proposed rule. Is the proposal for extension cords to have ALL 4 of the readily observable characteristics or at least 1 characteristic? Your help in clearing this up is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Shane Nash Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC. Air Force Safety Center Kirtland AFB, NM DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827
§ 92.15-15 Ventilation for crew quarters and, where provided, passenger spaces. ( a ) All living spaces shall be adequately ventilated in a manner suitable to the purpose of the space.
( b ) On vessels of 100 gross tons and over, except for such spaces as are so located that under all ordinary conditions of weather, windows, ports, skylights, etc., and doors to passageways can be kept open, all crew spaces shall be ventilated by a mechanical system, unless it can be shown that a natural system will provide adequate ventilation. However, vessels which trade regularly in the tropics shall, in general, be fitted with a mechanical ventilation system.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, M.K. JAMISON, T.P. BELSKY

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHRISTOPHER M. BOCCIA

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400078

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 5 November 2013.

Military Judge: LtCol C.M. Greer, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Marine Attack 

Squadron 223, Marine Aircraft Group 14, Cherry Point, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Col J.J. Murphy, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Charles D. Stimson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

26 June 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### §§ 507.131-507.139 [Reserved]
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |

|                   |
|-------------------|
|                   |  |  |  |
| 2.                | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company. |
|              |   |
| February 25, 2014 |   | /s/ Richard K. HoweRichard K. Howe, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer |
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, April 3, 1995 (54), Para 54.7 Message from the Senate]
[Page 524]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.54.7  message from the senate

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Hallen, one of its clerks, announced 
that the Senate has passed bills of the following titles, in which the 
concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 464. An Act to make the reporting deadlines for studies 
     conducted in Federal court demonstration districts consistent 
     with the deadlines for pilot districts, and for other 
     purposes; and
       S. 532. An Act to clarify the rules governing venue, and 
     for other purposes.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending October 24, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

TIMOTHY KEITH,

DIVISION ONE

Appellant, No. 70931-3-1

v.

AMANDA JAMISON

Respondent.

S wo

UNPUBLISHED OPINION £ TMo —< o-n -ti *"*';

FILED: MAY 182015 5 ^§°

sirPer Curiam — Timothy Keith, appearing pro se, appeals an order of .11 ^s

contempt imposing a sanction of $1,000 in attorney fees. He contends the order

should be reversed because the notice of hearing below did not comply with

SCLCR 6(d)(1)1 and he therefore "did not have proper time to respond" to the

motion for contempt. Assuming without deciding that the order is appealable as

a matter of right,2 Keith fails to demonstrate reversible error.

A violation of the notice requirements for motion hearings is grounds for

reversal only upon a showing of prejudice. O'Neill v. City of Shoreline, 183 Wn.

App. 15, 22, 332 P.3d 1099 (2014) (addressing CR 6(d)(1)); Zimnv v. Lovric. 59

Wn. App. 737, 740, 801 P.2d 259 (1990). Keith failed to demonstrate prejudice

or request a continuance below. He merely stated that he received notice of the

hearing "on Monday . . . , which only gave me four days [to prepare for the

hearing] and Ithought it had to be nine to fourteen days but I guess that's beside

1The rule provides in part: "Notes for the Motion Calendar shall be filed with the clerk of

the court and served on all parties at least nine (9) court days before the hearing."

2See In re Marriage of Waaner. 111 Wn. App. 9, 15-16, 44 P.3d 860 (2002) ("An

adjudication of contempt is appealable if it is a final order or judgment; i.e., the contumacy—the

party's willful resistance to the contempt order—is established, and the sanction is a coercive one

designed to compel compliance with the court's order.").
No. 70931-3-1/2

the point." Report of Proceedings (Aug. 30, 2013) at 7. For the first time on

appeal, Keith claims that he was prejudiced by the late notice.3 We need not

consider arguments made for the first time on appeal. RAP 2.5(a).

Affirmed.

FOR THE COURT:

3 He claims he "was up until 4:00 a.m. trying to put together his response which did not

contain any proper legal points and or arguments, just his story and or babbling of what took

place." Appellant's Br. at 1-2.
|                           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| 1.                        | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 of Inuvo, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                                                                                                  |  |  |
| 2.                        | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |  |                                                                                                  |  |  |
|                           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                  |  |  |
| Dated:  June 22, 2020 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  | /s/ Richard K. HoweRichard K. Howe, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer |  |  |