alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 8, 1995 (76), Para 76.5 Congressional Budget--FY 1996-FY 2002]
[Page 835]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.76.5  congressional budget--fy 1996-fy 2002

  On motion of Mr. KASICH, by unanimous consent, the concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) setting forth the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 
2000, 2001, and 2002; together with the amendment of the Senate thereto, 
was taken from the Speaker's table.
  When on motion of Mr. KASICH, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendment of the Senate and 
agree to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses thereon.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, June 8, 1995 (76), Para 76.6 Motion to Instruct Conferees--H. Con. Res. 67]
[Page 835]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.76.6  motion to instruct conferees--h. con. res. 67

  Mr. SABO moved that the managers on the part of the House at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on H. Con. Res. 
67, be instructed to agree to revenue levels (within the scope of the 
conference) that exclude the revenue effects of the Contract With 
America Tax Relief Act (H.R. 1215), and to insist on the House position 
regarding the Earned Income Tax Credit.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mr. SABO, the previous question was ordered on the motion 
to instruct the managers on the part of the House.
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House agree to said motion?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LaTOURETTE, announced that the nays had 
it.
  Mr. SABO objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  A quorum not being present,
  The roll was called under clause 4, rule XV, and the call was taken by 
electronic device.

Yeas

183

When there appeared

Nays

233
```
§ 57.01-1 Qualifications and production tests. ( a ) (Replaces QW 100 and QB 100.) The regulations in this part apply to the qualification of welding procedures, welders, and brazers, and to production tests for all types of manual and machine arc and gas welding and brazing processes.
( b ) (Modifies QW 305 and QB 305.) Operators of fully automatic welding and brazing machines are specifically exempt from performance qualification tests.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18872, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 74-102, 40 FR 27460, June 30, 1975]
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Jack                Rhian                                                 Jack                  Rhian President                  andChief                  Operating Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.**

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5


## APR 9 2013 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: WU-16J CERTIFIED MAIL 7009 1680 0000 7664 5539 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Kenneth K. Humphreys ChiefExecutive Officer FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc. 73 Central Park PlazaEast Jacksonville, Illinois 62650 Re: Completeness Review ofUnderground Injection Control (UIC) PermitApplications for Four Geologic Sequestration Wells; United States Environmental Protection Agency UIC Permit Nos. IL-137-6A-0001, -0002, -0003, & -0004 Dear Mr. Humphreys: On March15, 2013, we received from FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc_ permit applications for four carbon dioxide sequestration wells to be located in Morgan County, Illinois. Title 40 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations (40 CFR) Section 124.3(c) requires us to perform a completeness review within 30 days ofourreceipt ofthe application. We have reviewed the applications and determined that the application is incomplete becausethe following items are missing.
• Table 8.3 does not provide a list ofcontacts for States or Tribes identified to be withinthe area ofreview, as claimed in Table A_]_
• The qualifying financial responsibility instrument does notinclude a protective condition ofcoverage for cancellation due to failure to pay. The section referenced for this information in Table A.3, Section 9.4.2.6, does not exist inthe permit application_
• Persuantto 40 CFRPart 146, Subpart H, (e) (2 & 3) either a pump test or injectivity test mustbe conducted_ Table A.3 ofthe applications state that these tests are "NotPlanned_" We are proceeding with the evaluation ofthe informationprovided in the applications for technical soundness and compliance with applicable Underground Injection Control regulations. Ifadditional information is necessary to clarify, modify, or supplementthe informationyou provided, we will notify you_ When we determine that the information you provided is sufficient for permitting decisions, draft decisions will be made and a statement ofbasis for eachpermit will be prepared and supplied to you as well as the public for comment.lfyouhave any questions, please feel free to contactJanette E. Hansen ofmy staffat (312) 886-0241 or hansen.janettc@cpa.gov. Sincerely, j7,-.'\ 

# I.e ·:: 1

-- ):.. / Rebecca Harvey, Chief

/ 0 Y Underground Injection Control Branch

cc: StephenNightingale, Illinois EPA
SIP ADOPTION ORDPR 

The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) offered the public an opportunity to 

request a hearing and comment on the draft Infrastructure SIP Revision for the 2010 Nitrogen 

Dioxide, 2008 Ozone, and 1997, 2006, and 2012 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). We did not receive a request to hold a public hearing. We 

accepted comments from July 25, 2014, through August 27, 2014. The SIP Revision details 

Washington's capacity to implement, enforce, and maintain the 2010 NAAQS for nitrogen 

dioxide, 2008 NAAQS for ozone, and 1997, 2006, and 2012 NAAQS for fine particulate matter, 

and will revise the Washington State Implementation Plan. 

Ecology met all state and federal procedural requirements for public outreach by taking the 

following actions: 

• Published a legal notice in one newspaper on July 25, 2014. 

• Issued a news release on July 25, 2014. 

• Announced the public comment period and public hearing date on our online public 

involvement calendar. 

• Published notice on our website. 

• Provided an opportunity for the public to request a hearing by August 20, 2014. We did 

not receive a request for a hearing, so we did not hold one, as allowed by 40 CFR Section 

51.102 and WAC 173-400-171 "Public Involvement". 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the referenced document, constituting the revision, is approved 

and adopted by the Deparrtment of Ecology as part of the Washington State Implementation Plan. 

All provisions of the Washington State Implementation Plan inconsistent with the attached 

documents are superseded. 

~ .. 

Maia D. Bellon, Director 

Depariment of Ecology 

~ 

~ Dat
§ 78.33-1 Repairs of boiler and pressure vessels. ( a ) Before making any repairs to boilers or unfired pressure vessels, the chief engineer shall submit a report covering the nature of the repairs to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, at or nearest the port where the repairs are to be made.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 308.522 Collateral deposit fund, letter of transmittal, Form MA-302.

The standard form of letter of transmittal for use in establishing a collateral deposit fund may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   Information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date   | November 5,  2010 |   |           /s/  T. Randy Stevens    |
|--------|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   |   | T.  Randy Stevens, Chief Executive Officer                                           |
|   |                   |   |                                                                                 |
|   |                   |   |                                                                                 |
| Date   | November 5,  2010 |   |           /s/  Patricia P. Bearden |
|   |                   |   | Patricia  P. Bearden, Assistant Treasurer (principal financial officer)              |

 

----
#### § 71.20-15 Scope of inspections.

The initial inspection, which may consist of a series of inspections during the construction of a vessel, shall include a complete inspection of the structure, including the outside of the vessel's bottom, the machinery, unfired pressure vessels, equipment and the inside and outside of the boilers. The inspection shall be such as to insure that the arrangements, material, and scantlings of the structure, boilers and other pressure vessels and their appurtenances, piping, main and auxiliary machinery, electrical installations, lifesaving appliances, fire-detecting and extinguishing equipment, pilot boarding equipment, pollution prevention equipment and other equipment fully comply with the applicable regulations for such vessel and are in accordance with approved plans, and determine that the vessel is in possession of a valid certificate issued by the Federal Communications Commission, if any. The inspection shall be such as to ensure that the workmanship of all parts of the vessel and its equipment is in all respects satisfactory and that the vessel is provided with lights, means of making sound signals, and distress signals as required by applicable statutes and regulations.

[CGFR 68-32, 33 FR 5715, Apr. 12, 1968, as amended by CGD 82-036, 48 FR 654, Jan. 6, 1983; CGD 79-032, 49 FR 25455, June 21, 1984; CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48051, Sept. 18, 1995]
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02079**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02079\02079_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02079\02079_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02079\02079_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02079\02079_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02079\02079_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02079\Certification Statement Plant ID 02079.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_CLIFFSIDE A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Cliffside A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Cliffside C2-31a.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Cliffside C2-31b.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Cliffside C2-31c.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Cliffside D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Cliffside FGD WWTS Description.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\02079_Unit 5 Cost Estimate.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02079\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Duke Energy_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\CLIFFSIDE F5-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02079\Supplemental Documents\CLIFFSIDE G3-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                          10,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                       272
<INVENTORY>                                     24,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,514
<PP&E>                                          25,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,396
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,326)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,049
<SALES>                                         74,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,316
<CGS>                                           33,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,049)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
Olympia Address: PO Box 40442 Olympi a, WA 98504-0442 April 3, 2014 

## Washington State Senate Senator Doug Ericksen 42nd Legislative District

DennisMcLerran, Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, W A 98101 Dear Mr. McLerran, (360) 786-7682 FAX: (360) 786-1323 E-mail: Doug.Ericksen@leg.wa.gov

As you know, Washington's Department ofEcology is revisingthe human health criteria for the state's surface water quality standards. The new water quality standards will be the basis for a wide range ofregulatory decisions that affect all Washington residents. Therefore, I am seekingto assure thatthe criteria, which will be reviewed by EPA, is supported by sound scientific analysis and that it will not harm the state's economic vitality. One particular concern is cancerrisk. Your review ofthe state'sproposed criteria will include consideration ofthe appropriate cancer risk for Washington. I understandthat your agency's policies establish a generally acceptable cancerrisk range, typically falling between 10-6 and 10-4 risk level. EPA guidance also provides thatthe agency will afford flexibility for states to adopt cancer risk levels that best suitthe state's goals for use ofits surface waters. Unfortunately, a recent conversation with officials and stakeholders has revealed some uncertainty surrounding EPA's review ofcancerrisk. Irespectfully seek a response from your agency that outlines the review process that the state's proposed criteria will undergo, and I specifically would like to know what your agency considers to be an appropriate cancerrisk level for Washington.

() RecycledPage two I also seekyour input as to the state's options for setting a cancerrisk level
-- i.e. whetherthe criteriamay be based on a risk level chosen from a generally acceptable range, whetherEPA expects Washington to adopt a risk level of 10-6, or whether other options are available. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely,



# ~ **~~**

**~** Senate Energy, Environment

and Telecommunications Committee cc: Senator Rodney Tom Senator Mark Schoesler Senator Sharon Brown Senator BarbaraBailey
§ 1016.307 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or agency counsel or on his or her own initiative, the adjudicative officer may order further proceedings when necessary.
( b ) A request that the adjudicative officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
[46 FR 61660, Dec. 18, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 26380, June 23, 1989]
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending September 11, 2010

----

Banks, Foreign            Banco Davivienda, S.A., Bogota, Colombia -- to establish a branch in Miami, Florida, through the conversion of its Edge corporation subsidiary, Bancafe International.            -Approved, September 7, 2010            Forms            Forms -- to conduct the Interchange Transaction Fees Surveys (FR 3062).            -Approved, September 7, 2010            Monetary and Financial Policy            Term Deposit Facility -- authorization of ongoing small-value offerings of term deposits under the TDF.            -Approved, September 7, 2010            Personnel            Division of Research and Statistics -- appointment of Eric Engen, Michael Kiley, and Robin Prager as deputy associate directors and Arthur Kennickell and Jeffrey Campione as assistant directors.            -Announced, September 7, 2010            Enforcement            Bank of the Eastern Shore, Cambridge, Maryland -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the State of Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation.            -Announced, September 7, 2010                        First Community Holding Company, Hammond, Louisiana -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions.            -Announced, September 9, 2010                        Mountain West Financial Corp., Helena, Montana -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.            -Announced, September 7, 2010                        Pacific Mercantile Bancorp, Costa Mesa, California, and Pacific Mercantile Bank -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.            -Announced, September 7, 2010            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### In the Matter of the Application of Francis Swift.

Order denying writ of *certiorari*affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

■ Opinion by

Gilbert, J.;

Dykman; J., not sitting.
May 27, 2015

Mr. Charles Ayers

4912 Shoreline Circle Sanford, FL 32771

Dear Mr. Charles Ayers:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 14, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0998), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 97.34-1 Application. ( a ) Provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels inspected and certificated in accordance with this subchapter.
#### Thomas D. Adams and another, *Assignees, etc., Appellants, v.*Abram Stern and others, *Respondents.*

— Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 16, 1995 (67), Para 67.25 Submission of Conference Report--H.R. 1158]
[Page 747]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.67.25  submission of conference report--h.r. 1158

  Mr. LIVINGSTON submitted a conference report (Rept. No. 104-124) on 
the bill (H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
additional disaster assistance and making rescissions for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes; together with a 
statement thereon, for printing in the Record under the rule.
```