alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 9, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Boyd *v.*Webster.

A creditor, having a balance of the account of a former partnership, of which he had been a member, against the defendant, and continuing in his own name, with the defendant’s knowledge and consent, the same account, may, in the absence of direction by the defendant, apply subsequent payments and credits in satisfaction of the partnership indebtedness.

Assumpsit, for the balance of an account (reported in 58 N. H. 336). The business of the several firms with the defendant was by one continuous account, without rests or settlement. He understood this, and did not object. When the plaintiff succeeded to the business of Boyd, Corey, Ahl & Co., the defendant was indebted to that firm, and now objects that payments since made and credits given cannot be applied to that indebtedness. A part of the defendant’s business with Boyd, Corey & Co., of which firm the plaintiff is the surviving partner, was receiving materials to be-manufactured and returning the goods when made. The balance of account against the defendant was for money and notes furnished by the latter firm in excess of what was required for manufacturing the materials. The defendant claims that this cannot be recovered in assumpsit.

*90Barnard, for the defendant.

*Butler,*for the plaintiff.

Allen, J.

The defendant being liable to the plaintiff fox the amount of his indebtedness to Boyd, Corey, Ahl & Co. *(Boyd*v. *Webster, 58*N. H. 336, 337), the plaintiff, continuing the same account in his own name and in the same business, with the knowledge and without objection of the defendant, might, unless the defendant otherwise directed, apply payments made to himself to the satisfaction of any items of the continuous account, which included the first partnership debt. *Hilton*v. *Burley,*2 N. H. 196; *Morse*v. *Woods,*5 N. H. 301; *Sawyer*v. *Tappan,*14 N. H. 352; *Caldwell*v. *Wentworth, id.*431; *Carpenter*v. *Groin,*19 N. H. 482.

The balance found against the defendant being for money and notes furnished in excess, of what was required for manufacturing the materials, these must have been accounted for at the prices charged in the account, and no question can be made of the plaintiff’s right to recover the balance of the account in assumpsit.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending January 2, 2010

----

EnforcementAMB Financial Services Corporation, Bainbridge Island, Washington  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, December 28, 2009 					Johnson Holdings, Inc., Ramsey, Minnesota, and East Central Holding Company, Inc.  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.					-Announced, December 30, 2009 					Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., Melrose Park, Illinois, and Midwest Bank and Trust Company, Elmwood Park  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Division of Banking.					-Announced, December 30, 2009 					Sterling Financial Corporation, Spokane, Washington  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, December 31, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: January 7, 2010
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 5, 2009

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. | 4c8            | Independent Community Bancorp, Inc., Frankfort, Kentucky, to engage in lending and servicing activities.                                                                   | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable
|WESTBRIDGE BANCSHARES, INC.         | * 3A1          | WestBridge Bancshares, Inc., Chesterfield, Missouri, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of WestBridge Bank & Trust Company, Chesterfield, Missouri. | Newspaper:12/25/2009Federal Register:12/28/2009        
|Newspaper:                          | 12/25/2009    
|Federal Register:                   | 12/28/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                    | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST ST BK OF RED BUD, RED BUD, ILLINOIS | 356949 | 08/24/2009 | 12/01/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 7, 2009

----

Bank Holding CompaniesSouthern BancShares (N.C.), Inc., Mount Olive, North Carolina  -- to increase its ownership up to 9.9 percent of the voting shares of ECB Bancorp, Inc., Engelhard, and its subsidiary bank, The East Carolina Bank.					-Approved, March 6, 2009 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to revise without extension the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C) and Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Bank Holding Companies (FRY-9SP).					-Approved, March 6, 2009 					

MembershipICE US Trust LLC, New York, New York  -- to become a member of the Federal Reserve System, in connection with ICE's planned operation as a central counterparty and clearinghouse for certain credit default swaps.					-Approved, March 4, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyAmerican International Group, Inc., New York, New York  -- authorization for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to take certain actions relating to its Revolving Credit Facility for AIG as part of a restructuring by the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve of the government's assistance to help stabilize the company.					-Approved, March 1, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulation Z (Truth in Lending)  -- publication for comment of�amendments to�revise the disclosure requirements for private student loans consistent with recent statutory changes under the Higher Education Opportunity�Act of 2008.					-Approved, March 6, 2009 					

Testimony And StatementsAmerican International Group, Inc.  -- statement by Vice Chairman Kohn before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the role of the Federal Reserve in stabilizing AIG.					-Published, March 5, 2009 					The Economy and the Federal Budget  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the Senate Committee on the Budget on current economic and financial conditions and the federal budget.					-Published, March 3, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 12, 2009
§ 56.15-10 Special purpose fittings. ( a ) Special purpose fittings made in accordance with the applicable standards listed in table 2 to § 56.60-1 of this part and of materials complying with subpart 56.60, may be used within the material, size, pressure, and temperature limitations of those standards and within any further limitations specified in this subchapter.
( b ) Nonstandard special purpose fittings must meet the requirements of §§ 56.30-25, 56.30-40, 56.35-10, or 56.35-15, as applicable.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 42546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17570]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Funding Availability for the Small Business 
Transportation Resource Center Program

AGENCY: Department of Transportation (DOT), Office of the Secretary of 
Transportation (OST), Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business 
Utilization (OSDBU).

ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability; Extension of closing and award 
dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action extends the closing and award dates for a Notice 
of Funding Availability for the Small Business Transportation Resource 
Center that was published on June 15, 2012, 77 FR 36034. USDOT OSDBU is 
extending the closing date to allow eligible entities time to 
adequately submit a proposal.

DATES: The submission period for the Notice of Funding Availability 
published on June 15, 2012 closing on July 16, 2012 is extended until 
July 31, 2012, 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Also, the notice of award 
for the competed region on or before August 13, 2012 is extended until 
August 16, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Proposals must be electronically submitted to OSDBU via 
email at SBTRC@dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning 
this notice, contact Ms. Patricia Martin, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W56-462, Washington, DC, 20590. Telephone: 
1-800-532-1169. Email: patricia.martin@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the June 15, 2012 document (Notice No. 
USDOT-OST-OSDBU-SBTRC2012-10; Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0092), the 
Department of Transportation (DOT), Office of the Secretary (OST), 
Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) 
announces the opportunity for; (1) Business centered community-based 
organizations; (2) transportation-related trade associations; (3) 
colleges and universities; (4) community colleges or; (5) chambers of 
commerce, registered with the Internal Revenue Service as 501 C(6) or 
501 C(3) tax-exempt organizations, to compete for participation in 
OSDBU's Small Business Transportation Resource Center (SBTRC) program 
in the Central Region.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 12, 2012.
Brandon Neal,
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2012-17570 Filed 7-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.20-5 When made.

(a) The original inspection will only be made upon the written application of the owner or builder of the vessel to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, on Form CG-3752, Application for Inspection of U.S. Vessel, at or nearest the port where the vessel is located.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                SUBSIDIARIES OF NEWBRIDGE NETWORKS CORPORATION

The names of certain other subsidiaries, which considered in the aggregate would
not constitute a significant subsidiary, have been omitted.

                                                            Jurisdiction
Name of                                                     of Incorporation
Subsidiary                                                  or Organization
----------                                                  ---------------
Newbridge Networks Inc.                                     Delaware
Newbridge Networks Limited                                  England and Wales
Newbridge Networks Services SL                              United Kingdom
Newbridge Networks (Asia) Limited                           Hong Kong
Transistemas S.A.                                           Argentina
Newbridge Networks Telecomunicacoes Ltda.                   Brazil
Newbridge Networks de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                  Mexico
Newbridge Networks S.A.                                     France
Newbridge Networks (Middle East) WLL                        Bahrain
Nihon Newbridge Networks Corporation                        Japan
Newbridge Networks (Australia) Pty. Ltd                     Australia
Newbridge Networks Korea Ltd.                               Korea
Newbridge Networks Venezuela, S.A.                          Venezuela
Newbridge Networks GmbH                                     Germany
Newbridge Networks Ireland                                  Ireland
Newbridge Networks (Pty) Ltd                                South Africa
Newbridge (Barbados) Corporation                            Barbados
Newbridge Networks S.p.A.                                   Italy
Newbridge Networks GmbH (Austria)                           Austria
Coasin Chile S.A.                                           Chile
Acacia Limited                                              Barbados
Newbridge Networks (APL) L. BHD                             Malaysia
Newbridge Networks SDN. BHD.                                Malaysia
Newbridge Networks A/S                                      Denmark
Newbridge Networks AB                                       Sweden
Newbridge Networks S.L.                                     Spain
Newbridge Networks Benelux S.A.                             Belgium
Newbridge Networks B.V.                                     Netherlands

                                   Page 229
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1278

DEREK JARVIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 09-1675

DEREK JARVIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 09-1681

DEREK JARVIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 
ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 09-1718

DEREK JARVIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge; 

Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:07-cv-03385-DKC) 

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009 

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Derek Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, ISLER, DARE, 

RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Derek Jarvis seeks to appeal various orders in civil 

action: the denial of his motion to compel discovery, the denial 

of his motion for stay, the denial of his motion to recuse the 

district judge, and the order granting Defendant’s motion to 

compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders Jarvis seeks to appeal are 

neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral 

orders. Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss the 

appeal as this Court lacks jurisdiction. We also deny Jarvis’ 

motion for default judgment and for stay pending appeal and 

Appellee’s motion for sanctions and motion for an extension of 

time to respond to Jarvis’ motion for default judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### William H. Abell and another, *Respondents, v.*The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10400

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ruben Hernandez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-65-1

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Ruben Hernandez, federal prisoner # 36963-177, appeals the district 

court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). He argues that the court erred by relying on a guidelines 

policy statement and by ignoring evidence of his postsentencing 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10400 Document: 00516482930 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2022
No. 22-10400

2

rehabilitation. Our review of the district court’s ruling is for an abuse of 

discretion. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). 

Hernandez also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal, 

which motion is GRANTED.

In deciding a prisoner’s own motion for compassionate release, 

district courts are bound only by § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and the sentencing 

factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388, 393 

(5th Cir. 2021). Hernandez fails to show that the district court disregarded 

this authority, which it expressly acknowledged in its order. Moreover, even 

if the district court improperly limited its inquiry into whether Hernandez 

presented extraordinary and compelling reasons for his request, its separate 

determination that the § 3553(a) factors weighed against a reduced sentence 

suffices to support its decision. See Ward v. United States, 11 F.4th 354, 360-

62 (5th Cir. 2021); Chambliss, 948 F.3d at 693-94.

Contrary to Hernandez’s assertions, the district court’s ruling reflects 

that the court considered his arguments but concluded nonetheless that the 

§ 3553(a) factors weighed against granting relief. Hernandez fails to 

demonstrate that the court abused its discretion in reaching this conclusion, 

and his mere disagreement with it “is not a sufficient ground for reversal.” 

Chambliss, 948 F.3d at 694. We are also not persuaded by his attempt to show 

an abuse of discretion based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Pepper v. 

United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011). 

Accordingly, the district court’s ruling is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-10400 Document: 00516482930 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2022