UNITED STATES
                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        WASHINGTON, DC.  20549
                               FORM 10-K/A
                            (Amendment No. 3)


(Mark One)
[X]  ANNUAL  REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE  SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended         December 31, 2001
                         ---------------------------------------------
                                  or
[   ]  TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT TO SECTION  13  OR  15(d)  OF  THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________ to _________________

Commission file number                33-19811
                       -----------------------------------------------

                     DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
        (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     Pennsylvania                                        23-2492210
-------------------------------                    -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                    (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                     Identification No.)

                1521 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA  19102
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code    (215) 557-9800
                                                    ------------------

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:   NONE
                                                            ----------

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: 25,461 Units
                                                            ------------

                 Units of Limited Partnership Interest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                           (Title of Class)

Indicate  by  check  mark whether the registrant  (1)  has  filed  all
reports  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934 during the preceding 12 months  (or  for  such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and  (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past  90
days.                                            Yes   X      No
                                                     -----       -----

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant  to
Item  405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will  not  be
contained  to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive  proxy
or  information statements incorporated by reference in  Part  III  of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

Aggregate  market  value  of  Units  held  by  non-affiliates  of  the
Registrant:                                           Not Applicable *
                                                      ----------------
*Securities not quoted in any trading market to Registrant's knowlege.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes ___ No_X_


<PAGE>


                           EXPLANATORY NOTE
                           ----------------

Diversified  Historic Investors VI (the "Registrant")  is  filing
this  Amendment No. 3 to its Amendment No. 2 which was filed with
the  Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 9, 2006,
concerning  its  Annual Report on Form 10-K for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2001.

This Amendment No. 3 is being filed for the purpose of correcting
a  typographical  error in our independent  Registered  Certified
Public   Accounting  Firm's  report  to  state  the  Registrant's
financial statements are audited in accordance with the  auditing
standards  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United
States of America).

We  have not updated the information contained herein for  events
occurring  subsequent to March 9, 2006, the filing  date  of  the
Original Filing.

<PAGE>



                             PART I
                             ------

Item 1.      Business
             --------

          a. General Development of Business

              Diversified Historic Investors VI ("Registrant") is
a  limited partnership formed in 1988 under Pennsylvania law.  As
of  December 31, 2001, Registrant had outstanding 25,461 units of
limited partnership interest (the "Units").

              Registrant is presently in its operating stage.  It
originally owned eight properties or interests therein.  Interest
in  two  properties  have been lost through  foreclosure  and  an
interest in a third property has been reduced substantially.  See
Item  2. Properties, for a description thereof.  For a discussion
of  the  operations  of  the Registrant, see  Part  II.  Item  7.
Management's  Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and
Results of Operations.

               The   following   is  a  summary  of   significant
transactions involving the Registrant's interests:

          b. Financial Information about Industry Segments

             The Registrant operates in one industry segment.

          c. Narrative Description of Business

             Registrant is in the business of operating, holding,
selling,  exchanging  and  otherwise dealing  in  and  with  real
properties containing improvements which are "Certified  Historic
Structures," as such term is defined in the Internal Revenue Code
(the "Code"), or which are eligible for designation as such,  for
use  as apartments, offices, hotels and commercial spaces, or any
combination thereof, or low income housing eligible for  the  tax
credit provided by Section 42 of the Code, and such other uses as
the Registrant's general partner may deem appropriate.

             Since the Registrant's inception, all the properties
acquired either by the Registrant, or the subsidiary partnerships
in  which  it  has  an  interest,  have  been  rehabilitated  and
certified  as historic structures and have received  the  related
investment  tax credit.  In addition, four properties  (Roseland,
Mater Dolorosa, Strehlow Terrace and Saunders Apartments) are low-
income  housing structures which qualify for, have received,  and
will  continue to receive, the low income tax credits.   Each  of
the  properties  currently owned are held for rental  operations.
At  this  time  it  is anticipated that all the  properties  will
continue  to  be  held for this purpose.  At such  time  as  real
property  values begin to increase to a point where they  can  be
sold  at  a  price  which is sufficient to repay  the  underlying
indebtedness,  the  Registrant will  re-evaluate  its  investment
strategy regarding the properties.

              As of December 31, 2001, Registrant owned interests
in  six  properties, located in Nebraska (three), Virginia (one),
Pennsylvania   (one),  and  Louisiana  (one).   In   total,   the
properties  contain  100 apartment units, 149  condominium  units
used   as  rental  units,  and  42,772  square  feet  ("sf")   of
commercial/retail space.  As of December 31,  2001,  219  of  the
apartment and condominium units were under lease (88%) at monthly
rental rates ranging from $246 to $1,550.  In addition, 44,115 sf
of commercial/retail space was under lease (100%) at annual rates
ranging  from  $7.12 to $24.14 per sf.  Rental of the  apartments
and  commercial  space is not expected to  be  seasonal.   For  a
further discussion of the properties, see Item 2. Properties.

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

               On    June  30,  2002,  the  Registrant  sold  its
investment  in Saunders Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds  of
the sale were used to pay the accrued expenses of the Registrant.

              The  Registrant is affected by and subject  to  the
general  competitive conditions of the residential and commercial
real  estate  industry.   As a result of  the  overbuilding  that
occurred in the 1980's, the competition for both residential  and
commercial  tenants in the local markets where  the  Registrant's
properties  are  located is generally strong.   In  each  of  the
markets,   there  are  several  similar  historically   certified
rehabilitated buildings.  Two of the properties held  for  rental
are   market-rate  properties  and  are  located  in  Alexandria,
Virginia,  and  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  At these  properties
the  Registrant  is forced to keep its rent levels  competitively
low  in  order  to  maintain moderate to high  occupancy  levels.
Management  of  each  of these properties makes  frequent  market
analyses  in order to set rent levels.  When occupancy nears  the
97-99% range, management considers raising the rents by more than
a  normal cost of living increase. If occupancy falls below  85%,
management considers lowering rents.  Four of the properties held
for  rental are low-income housing structures located  in  Omaha,
Nebraska,  and  New  Orleans, Louisiana.  These  properties  have
fixed  rental  rates  and face competition for  low  to  moderate
income  tenants  from other low income properties  in  the  area.
However, there is no organization which holds a dominant position
in the residential housing or commercial leasing market in any of
the  geographic  areas in which the Registrant's  properties  are
located.

              Registrant has no employees.  The management of the
Registrant's properties are overseen by Brandywine Construction &
Management, Inc. ("BCMI"), a real estate management firm.

           d.  Financial Information About Foreign  and  Domestic
Operations and Export Sales

              See  Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.


Item 2.      Properties
             ----------

           As of December 31, 2001, Registrant owned interests in
five  partnerships  that each owns one property  and  a  minority
interest in an additional partnership that owns one property.   A
summary description of each property is given below.

            a.  Firehouse  Square  -  consists  of  31,507sf   of
commercial space at 902-910 King Street in Alexandria,  Virginia.
In  December  1988, Registrant was admitted, with a  90%  general
partner   interest,  to  Firehouse  Square  General   Partnership
("FSGP"),  a  Virginia general partnership, for  a  cash  capital
contribution of $1,750,000.  FSGP acquired and rehabilitated  the
property  for $5,660,000 ($151.51 per sf), funded by  the  equity
contribution and a mortgage note payable of $4,207,000.  On  June
1,  1993,  the  first mortgage was modified.  The  terms  of  the
modification  included  the addition of all  accrued  and  unpaid
interest ($218,728) to the principal balance and revision of  the
payment terms.  The lender also advanced $40,711 for real  estate
taxes  and $33,627 for tenant improvements.  Monthly payments  of
interest  to  the new note holder were to be made  in  an  amount
equal  to  net  operating income.  The note accrued  interest  at
prime  plus  1/2%.  On November 16, 1994, the new first  mortgage
holder  foreclosed  upon its mortgage.  By "credit  bidding"  its
mortgage,  the  mortgage holder became the successful  bidder  at
sale.   The first mortgage holder sold its successful  bid  to  a
partnership known as 901 King Street Associates ("KSA").  KSA  is
a  general partnership owned 90% by the Registrant.  The  selling
price  of the mortgage was the amount that the mortgage had  been
immediately  prior  to  foreclosure.  The  obligation  has  terms
materially the same as the original mortgage loan and is  secured
by  a  new mortgage on the property.  Therefore, after the  sale,
the  Registrant's  interest in the property was  unchanged.   The
principal  balance  of  the mortgage at  December  31,  1997  was
$4,304,188.  The note accrued interest at prime plus 1/2% and the
entire principal balance was due October 1998.  In June 1995, the
Registrant refinanced $900,000 of the first mortgage.  This  loan
bore  interest  at 9.75%, was payable in monthly installments  of
principal  and interest of $8,021 and was due in June  2005.   In
November  1998,  both  mortgages  were  refinanced.   The   first
mortgage  was  refinanced with a $1,937,000  mortgage  (principal
balance  of $1,849,227 at December 31, 2001) which bears interest
at  7.08%,  is  payable in monthly installments of principal  and
interest  of  $13,789 and is due in November  2008.   The  second
mortgage  was  refinanced with a $4,330,107  mortgage  (principal
balance  of $4,367,913 at December 31, 2001) which bears interest
at  7%, is due in December 2008 with monthly payments of interest
to  be made in an amount equal to net operating income.  Proceeds
from  the  refinancing of the first mortgage were used to  reduce
the second mortgage principal.

              In  September 2002, the mortgages were  refinanced.
The  principal  balance of the first mortgage  was  increased  to
$3,520,000  and the net proceeds were used to reduce  the  second
mortgage.   In  exchange for a 20% ownership interest  in  and  a
preferred  return from KSA, the second mortgage holder  converted
the  balance  of its outstanding debt to equity.  The  new  first
mortgage bears interest at  6.75 % and is due March 1, 2013.

             The property is managed by BCMI.  As of December 31,
2001,  all  31,507 sf of space were under lease (100%) at  annual
rates ranging from $7.56 to $22.18 per sf.  The occupancy for the
previous  four years was 100% for 2000, 1999, and 1998,  and  94%
for  1997.  The average annual rent was $7.34 to $21.53 for 2000,
and  $7.12  to  $20.89 for 1999,1998, and 1997. There  are  three
tenants  who  each  occupy ten percent or more  of  the  rentable
square  footage.   They operate principally as  a  law  firm,  an
architectural  firm  and  a computer  company.   All  leases  are
operating  leases  and the minimum future  rentals  on  the  non-
cancelable leases as of December 31, 2001 are $538,505.
              The  following is a table showing commercial  lease
expirations at Firehouse Square for the next five years.

                                        Total
                                        annual    % of gross
                          Total sf      rental      annual
              Number of      of       covered by    rental
               Leases     expiring     expiring      from
     Year     expiring     leases       leases     property
     ----     ---------   --------    ----------  ----------
     2002         4        13,227      $216,570     43%
     2003         5        14,286      $244,805     45%
     2004         0             0      $      0      0%
     2005         1         1,344      $ 28,224      4%
     2006         1         2,650      $ 48,906      8%



              For  tax  purposes, this property has  a  basis  of
$4,227,405 and is depreciated using the straight-line method with
a  useful  life  of 39 years.  The annual real estate  taxes  are
$39,710.  It  is the opinion of the management of the  Registrant
that the property is adequately covered by insurance.

           b. Roseland - consists of 17 low-income apartments and
3,000  sf  of  retail space at 4932 South 24th  Street  in  South
Omaha,  Nebraska.  In July 1988, Registrant was admitted  with  a
98% general partner interest and a 1% limited partner interest to
Roseland  Redevelopment  Partners  ("RRP"),  a  Nebraska  limited
partnership,  for a cash capital contribution of  $700,000.   RRP
acquired  and  rehabilitated the property for $1,680,000  ($70.29
per  sf),  funded  by  the equity contribution  and  three  notes
payable.   The  first  note payable of $500,000  is  non-interest
bearing with principal due upon sale of the property; the  second
note  payable  of $63,313 bore interest at 9.16%,  with  interest
adjusting every three years based on the three-year Treasury Bill
rate   plus   250  basis  points,  was  payable  in   semi-annual
installments of principal and interest of $4,856 and was  due  in
November  2001.  The  third note payable of  $370,000  (principal
balance of $323,279 at December 31, 2001) bears interest  at  8%,
is  payable in monthly installments of principal and interest  of
$3,083 and is due in August 2006.

              The  property is managed by an independent property
management  firm.   On December 31, 2001, 15 of  the  units  were
leased  (71%) at monthly rents of $151 to $475 and  3,000  sf  of
commercial  space (100%) was leased at annual rents ranging  from
$3.00 to $8.00 per sf.  All residential leases are renewable, one-
year  leases.   The occupancy for the residential units  for  the
previous four years was 80% for 2000, 80% for 1999, 82% for 1998,
and   92%   for  1997.   The  monthly  rental  range   has   been
approximately the same since 1995.  The commercial space has been
100%  occupied since 1995.  The range for annual rents  has  been
$3.00 to $8.00 for 2000, $3.13 to $5.00 per sf for 1999 and 1998,
and  $3.13  to  $5.50 per sf for 1997.  There is one  tenant  who
occupies ten percent or more of the rentable square footage.   It
principally   functions  as  a  tax  counseling  provider.    All
commercial  leases  are operating leases and the  minimum  future
rentals  on the noncancelable leases as of December 31, 2001  are
$4,800.

              The  following is a table showing commercial  lease
expirations at Roseland for the next five years:

                                        Total
                                        annual
                          Total sf      rental
              Number of      of       covered by  % of gross
               Leases     expiring     expiring     annual
     Year     expiring     leases       leases      rental
     ----     ---------   --------    ----------  ----------
     2002         0             0             0      0%
     2003         1           600        $4,800      7%
     2004         0             0             0      0
     2005         0             0             0      0
     2006         0             0             0      0

              For  tax  purposes, this property has  a  basis  of
$1,715,564 and is depreciated using the straight-line method with
a  useful  life of 27.5 years.  The annual real estate taxes  are
$1,268.  It  is  the opinion of the management of the  Registrant
that the property is adequately covered by insurance.

           c.  Mater  Dolorosa Apartments - consists  of  68  low
income apartments located at 1265 South Carrollton Avenue in  New
Orleans, Louisiana.  In July 1988, Registrant was admitted with a
90%  general  partnership  interest  to  Mater  Dolorosa  General
Partnership  ("MDGP") a Pennsylvania general partnership,  for  a
cash contribution of $1,519,000.  MDGP acquired and rehabilitated
the property for $3,149,000 ($59.39 per sf), funded by the equity
contribution and a note payable of $1,790,000.  The note  payable
bears  interest  at 8.5%, is payable in monthly  installments  of
principal  and  interest of $17,627, and is  due  in  April  2005
(principal balance at December 31, 2001 of $446,261).

              The  property  is managed by a property  management
firm which is an affiliate of the Registrant's co-general partner
of MDGP.  At December 31, 2001, 66 of the units were rented (97%)
at monthly rents of $530 to $625.  All leases are renewable, one-
year  leases.  The occupancy for the previous four years was 100%
for 2000, 97% for 1999, 1998, and 1997.  The monthly rental range
was  $519  to $621 in 2000, and has been approximately  the  same
since  1995.   For tax purposes, this property  has  a  basis  of
$2,803,265 and is depreciated using the straight-line method with
a  useful  life of 27.5 years.  The annual real estate taxes  are
$5,541.  There is no one tenant who occupies ten percent or  more
of  the  building.   It is the opinion of the management  of  the
Registrant that the property is adequately covered by insurance.

           d.  Strehlow Terrace Apartments - consists of  70  low
income  apartment units located at 2024 North 16th Street, Omaha,
Nebraska.   In January 1989, Registrant was admitted with  a  98%
general  partner interest to Strehlow Terrace Apartments  Limited
Partnership ("STALP"), a Nebraska limited partnership, for a cash
capital   contribution  of  $2,250,000.    STALP   acquired   and
rehabilitated the property for $5,817,000 ($52.02 per sf)  funded
by  the equity contribution and three mortgage loans.  The  first
loan,   financed  through  the  Governmental  National   Mortgage
Association  ("GNMA")  is for $1,789,000  (principal  balance  at
December  31, 2001 of $1,775,053), bears interest at 10-1/4%,  is
payable  in  monthly installments of principal  and  interest  of
$15,540,  and  is due in 2030.  In August 1993,  six  units  were
damaged  by  a  fire at Strehlow Terrace.  Due to  the  financial
difficulties caused by the fire, STALP fell behind on its monthly
debt  service by several months.  Although the property was  able
to  reduce  the  arrearage by 50% and commenced regular,  monthly
payments  by May 1994, the loan was declared in default  and  was
assigned  by  GNMA  to the Federal Housing Administration/Housing
and  Urban  Development ("FHA/HUD") on  June  24,  1994.   As  of
December 31, 2001, workout opportunities with HUD continue to  be
suspended.  The other two loans were made by the City  of  Omaha.
One,  in the amount of $1,700,000, bears interest at 1%, and  the
other,  in  the amount of $75,000, is non-interest bearing.   The
principal and applicable interest on both City of Omaha loans  is
due  upon the sale of the property or in the year 2030, whichever
is earlier.

              The  property is managed by an independent property
management firm.  On December 31, 2001, 47 of the apartments were
leased  (67%)  at monthly rents ranging from $200 to  $577.   All
leases  are  renewable, one-year leases.  The occupancy  for  the
previous four years was 89% for 2000, 98% for 1999, 97% for 1998,
and   97%   for  1997.   The  monthly  rental  range   has   been
approximately  the  same  since 1995.   For  tax  purposes,  this
property  has a basis of $4,886,283 and is depreciated using  the
straight-line  method  with a useful life  of  27.5  years.   The
annual real estate taxes are $14,982. No one tenant occupies  ten
percent  of  more  of  the building.  It is the  opinion  of  the
management  of  the  Registrant that the property  is  adequately
covered by insurance.

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

          e. Canal House - consists of 71 residential condominium
units and 8,341sf of commercial condominium space located at 4250-
4312  Main  Street,  Manayunk, Pennsylvania.  In  February  1989,
Registrant  was  admitted  to  Canal  House  Historic  Associates
("CHHA"), a Pennsylvania limited partnership, with a 99%  general
partner  interest for a cash contribution of $6,000,000.   During
1990,   Registrant  made  an  additional  cash  contribution   of
$200,000.  The 1% limited partnership interest is also controlled
by  Registrant;  it  is held by a Pennsylvania corporation  whose
stock  is  owned by Registrant.  CHHA acquired and  rehabilitated
the  property for $9,700,000 ($94.41 per sf) which was funded  by
the equity contribution and a loan of $4,000,000 with interest at
7.75% and monthly principal and interest payments (based on a 30-
year  amortization  schedule).  In October 1995,  the  Registrant
ceased  making  debt  service payments.  The  loan  was  sold  in
December 1995.  The Registrant entered into an agreement with the
new  holder  of  the  note (principal balance  of  $1,520,117  at
December  31, 2001) whereby the maturity of the loan was extended
to  December 2002 and monthly payments of interest are to be made
to  the  new  note  holder in an amount equal  to  net  operating
income.   In April 1996, the Registrant refinanced $3,216,000  of
the  first  mortgage.  This new loan was a first  mortgage  which
bore  interest  at  8.75%,  payable in  monthly  installments  of
principal and interest of $25,300 and was due in April 2003.   In
September 1998, the second mortgage lender advanced the  property
$3,907,200  to  repay the first mortgage with  the  intention  of
refinancing  the first mortgage at a lower interest  rate.   This
refinancing  was  completed in January  1999  with  a  $4,000,000
mortgage  loan  which  bears interest at  7.22%,  is  payable  in
monthly payments of principal and interest of $27,206 and is  due
in January 2009.

              The  property is managed by BCMI. At  December  31,
2001,  69  of  the residential units were under  lease  (97%)  at
monthly rents of $725 to $1,695, and 7,306 sf of commercial space
was  under  lease (88%) at annual rents ranging  from  $22.80  to
$26.87  per  sf.  All residential leases are renewable,  one-year
leases.  The occupancy for the residential units for the previous
four years was 96% for 2000, 93% for 1999, 92% for 1998, and  94%
for  1997.   The monthly rental range has been approximately  the
same since 1995.  The occupancy for the commercial space was 100%
for 2000, 1999, and 1998, and 90% for 1997.  The range for annual
rents  was  $22.47 to $23.22 for 2000, $7.12 to $20.89 for  1999,
$19.00 to $24.14 per sf for 1998, and $19.00 to $23.11 per sf for
1997.  There are no tenants who occupy ten percent or more of the
rentable square footage.  All leases are operating leases and the
minimum future rentals on the noncancelable leases as of December
31, 2001 are $183,341.
              The  following is a table showing commercial  lease
expirations at Canal House for the next five years.

                                         Total
                                        annual
                          Total sf      rental
              Number of      of       covered by  % of gross
               Leases     expiring     expiring     annual
     Year     expiring     leases       leases      rental
     ----     ---------   --------    ----------  ----------
     2002         1          850       $ 19,740       2%
     2003         0            0              0       0
     2004         0            0              0       0
     2005         1        2,426       $ 55,313       5%
     2006         1        4,030       $108,288      11%


              For  tax  purposes, this property has  a  basis  of
$8,488,548 and is depreciated using the straight-line method with
a  useful  life of 27.5 years.  The annual real estate taxes  are
$93,268.  It  is the opinion of the management of the  Registrant
that the property is adequately covered by insurance.

          f.   Saunders  Apartments - consists of  23  low-income
apartments   at  415  North  41st  Avenue  in  Omaha,   Nebraska.
Registrant  acquired  a 99% joint venture  interest  in  Saunders
Apartments Joint Venture ("SAJV"), a Nebraska Joint Venture,  for
a  cash  capital  contribution of $875,000.   SAJV  acquired  and
rehabilitated the property for $1,815,000 ($79.96 per sf), funded
by  the  equity contribution and a mortgage payable of  $675,000.
The note was retired with $285,000 advanced from Registrant's co-
general   partner,  and  a  mortgage  note  payable  of  $395,000
(principal  balance  at  December 31,  2001  of  $266,415).   The
mortgage  note  bears interest at 10.87%, is payable  in  monthly
installments of $3,723 and matured in May 1997.  On June 1,  1993
an  amended  and  restated joint venture  agreement  was  reached
whereby the Registrant's interest was reduced to a 30% interest.

              The  property is managed by an independent property
management  firm.  As of December 31, 2001, 23 units  were  under
lease (96%) with rents ranging from $385 to $430.  All leases are
renewable, one-year leases.  The occupancy for the previous  four
years was 96% for 2000, 100% for 1999, 100% for 1998, and 93% for
1997.   The monthly rental range has been approximately the  same
since  1995.   For tax purposes, this property  has  a  basis  of
$2,010,482 and is depreciated using the straight-line method with
a  useful  life of 27.5 years.  The annual real estate taxes  are
$7,923.  No  one  tenant  occupies ten percent  or  more  of  the
building.   It is the opinion of the management of the Registrant
that the property is adequately covered by insurance.

               On    June  30,  2002,  the  Registrant  sold  its
investment  in Saunders Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds  of
the sale were used to pay the accrued expenses of the Registrant.


Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
         -----------------

         a. To the best of its knowledge, Registrant is not party
to,  nor  are  any of its properties the subject of, any  pending
material legal proceedings.


Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
          ---------------------------------------------------

          No matter was submitted during the fiscal years covered
by this report to a vote of security holders.



                             PART II
                             -------

Item  5.    Market  for  Registrant's Common Equity  and  Related
            Stockholder Matters
            -----------------------------------------------------

         a. There is no established public trading market for the
Units.   Registrant  does not anticipate  any  such  market  will
develop.   Trading  in  the units occurs solely  through  private
transactions.  The Registrant is not aware of the prices at which
trades occur.  Registrant's records indicate that 203 units  were
sold or exchanged of record in 2001.

          b.  As  of  December 31, 2001, there were 2,827  record
holders of Units.

          c.   Registrant did not declare any cash dividends in 2001
or 2000.


Item 6.   Selected Financial Data
          -----------------------

         The  following selected financial data are for the  five
years  ended  December 31, 2001.  This data  should  be  read  in
conjunction  with the consolidated financial statements  included
elsewhere  herein.  This data is not covered by  the  independent
auditors' report.

                    2001        2000       1999        1998         1997
                    ----        ----       ----        ----         ----
Rental income $ 2,434,782 $ 2,445,698 $ 2,373,232 $ 2,295,927  $ 2,332,312

Interest income     4,681       6,966       3,677       2,783          949
Net loss        1,395,838   1,338,104   1,650,894   2,447,292    2,016,133
Net loss
 per Unit           54.27       52.03       64.19       95.16        78.40
Total assets
 (net of depre-
 ciation and
 amortization) 15,571,065  16,646,793  17,740,808  18,878,736   19,709,306
Debt obliga-
 tions         16,616,789  16,857,962  17,077,741  17,161,190   15,451,686

Note:  See Part II, Item 7.3 Results of Operations for a
discussion of factors which materially affect the comparability
of the information reflected in the above table.


Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of
          Financial Condition and Results of Operations
          ---------------------------------------------

          (1)  Liquidity

               At   December  31,  2001,  Registrant  had   total
unrestricted cash of $38,973.  Cash generated from operations  is
used  primarily to fund operating expenses and debt service.   If
cash  flow proves to be insufficient, the Registrant will attempt
to negotiate loan modifications with the various lenders in order
to  remain  current  on all obligations.  The Registrant  is  not
aware of any additional sources of liquidity.

              As  of December 31, 2001, Registrant had restricted
cash  of  $294,265 consisting primarily of funds held as security
deposits,   replacement  reserves  and  escrows  for  taxes   and
insurance.   As a consequence of these restrictions  as  to  use,
Registrant does not deem these funds to be a source of liquidity.

               In   recent  years  the  Registrant  has  realized
significant  losses, including the foreclosure of two  properties
and a substantial reduction of interest in a third property.   At
the  present time, all remaining properties are able to pay their
operating  expenses  and  debt  service  including  two  of   the
properties where the mortgages are cash-flow mortgages, requiring
all available cash after payment of operating expenses to be paid
to  the  first  mortgage  holder.   None  of  the  properties  is
currently  producing a material amount of revenues in  excess  of
operating  expenses and debt service.  Therefore, it is  unlikely
that  any  cash will be available to the Registrant  to  pay  its
general and administrative expenses.

             It is the Registrant's intention to continue to hold
the  properties  until they can no longer meet the  debt  service
requirements  and the properties are foreclosed,  or  the  market
value  of the properties increases to a point where they  can  be
sold  at  a  price  which is sufficient to repay  the  underlying
indebtedness (principal plus accrued interest).


             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing
and Urban Development, the guarantor of the first mortgage, on
April 30, 2002.

              On   June 30, 2002, the Registrant's investment  in
Saunders  Apartments was sold for $25,000.  The proceeds  of  the
sale were used to pay the accrued expenses of the Registrant.

          (2)  Capital Resources

               Any  capital  expenditures  needed  are  generally
replacement  items and are funded out of cash from operations  or
replacement reserves, if any.  The Registrant is not aware of any
factors which would cause historical capital expenditures  levels
not  to  be indicative of capital requirements in the future  and
accordingly,  does  not  believe that  it  will  have  to  commit
material  resources  to capital investments for  the  foreseeable
future.

          (3)  Results of Operations

              During  2001,  Registrant incurred a  net  loss  of
$1,395,838  ($54.27 per limited partnership unit) compared  to  a
net  loss of $1,338,104 ($52.03 per limited partnership unit)  in
2000 and a net loss of $1,650,894 ($64.84 per limited partnership
unit) in 1999.

              Rental income increased from $2,373,232 in 1999  to
$2,445,698  in  2000 and decreased to $2,434,782  in  2001.   The
decrease  from  2000  to  2001 is due to a  decrease  in  average
occupancy  at  Strehlow, partially offset by an increase  in  the
average  rental  rates at Canal House and Firehouse  Square.  The
increase  from  1999  to 2000 is due to an  increase  in  average
occupancy at Canal House and Mater Dolorosa, partially offset  by
a decrease in average occupancy at Roseland and Strehlow.

              Rental operations expense increased from $1,123,015
in  1999  to  $1,192,754 in 2000 and to $1,247,800 in  2001.  The
increase  from 2000 to 2001 is due to an increase in  maintenance
expense at Canal House, Mater Dolorosa, and Roseland, an increase
in utilities expense at Strehlow and Roseland, and an increase in
insurance  expense  at   Canal House  and  Mater  Dolorosa.   The
increase  from  1999 to 2000 is due increases in accounting  fees
and  commissions  expense  at Canal  House,  wages  and  salaries
expense at Mater Dolorosa and Strehlow and maintenance expense at
Firehouse  Square, partially offset by a decrease in  maintenance
expense at Strehlow.

              Interest expense decreased from $1,411,077 in  1999
to  $1,398,919 in 2000 and to $1,397,720 in 2001.   The  decrease
from  2000 to 2001 and from 1999 to 2000 is due to a decrease  in
the principal balance on which interest is calculated.

             Depreciation and amortization expense decreased from
$1,229,432  in  1999  to  $1,178,867 in  2000  and  increased  to
$1,190,197 in 2001.  The decrease from 1999 to 2000 is due to the
full amortization of loan costs at Canal House in 1999.

              In  2001,  losses  of $1,293,000 were  incurred  at
Registrant's properties compared to losses of $ 1,227,000 in 2000
and    $1,301,000   in   1999.    A   discussion   of    property
operations/activities follows:

              In  2001, Registrant incurred a loss of $86,000  at
Roseland, including $69,000 of depreciation expense, compared  to
a  loss of $79,000, including $70,000 of depreciation expense, in
2000  and  a  loss of $77,000 including, $71,000 of  depreciation
expense,  in  1999.   Since  Roseland is  a  low  income  housing
property, rents are fixed in relation to specified income levels.
As  a  result,  similar  to Mater Dolorosa and  Strehlow  Terrace
discussed  below, the property experiences high occupancy  levels
but rental income remains low.  The increase in loss from 2000 to
2001  is  due to an increase in utilities expense and maintenance
expense.  The increase in utilities expense is due to an increase
in electricity expense and the increase in maintenance expense is
due  to  an  increase  in  apartment preparation  expenses.   The
increase  in  the loss from 1999 to 2000 is due to a decrease  in
rental  income and an increase in maintenance expense,  partially
offset  by  a decrease in legal and accounting expense and  wages
and salaries expense.

              In 2001, Registrant incurred a loss of $460,000  at
Firehouse   Square,  including  $276,000  of   depreciation   and
amortization  expense, compared to a loss of $499,000,  including
$268,000 of depreciation and amortization expense, in 2000 and  a
loss   of  $480,000,  including  $261,000  of  depreciation   and
amortization expense in 1999.  The decrease in loss from 2000  to
2001 is due to an increase in rental income, partially offset  by
an increase in depreciation and interest expense. The increase in
rental income is due to an increase in average rental rates.  The
increase  in  loss  from 1999 to 2000 is due to  an  increase  in
rental  and  interest income, partially offset by an increase  in
maintenance expense. The increase in rental income is due  to  an
increase in average occupancy and the increase in interest income
is  due  to  interest  earned on a lender  reserve  balance.  The
increase  in  maintenance  expense  is  due  to  an  increase  in
maintenance service and plumbing and electrical expense.

              In 2001, Registrant recognized income of $16,000 at
Mater  Dolorosa,  including  depreciation  expense  of  $126,000,
compared to income of $21,000, including depreciation expense, of
$126,000  in  2000  and a loss of $9,000, including  depreciation
expense,  of  $127,000 in 1999.  Since Mater Dolorosa  is  a  low
income housing property, rents are fixed in relation to specified
income  levels.   As a result, similar to Roseland  and  Strehlow
Terrace,  the  property  experiences high  occupancy  levels  but
rental  income remains low.  The decrease in income from 2000  to
2001  is  due to an increase in insurance expense and maintenance
expense.  The  increase  in maintenance  expense  is  due  to  an
increase in repairs expense. The increase in income from 1999  to
2000 is due to an increase in rental income, partially offset  by
an  increase in operating expenses. The increase in rental income
is  due  to  an increase in occupancy. The increase in  operating
expenses is due to an increase in utilities expense and wages and
salaries  expense, partially offset by a decrease in  maintenance
expense and real estate tax expense.

              In 2001, Registrant incurred a loss of $449,000  at
Strehlow  Terrace Apartments, including depreciation  expense  of
242,000,  compared to a loss of $325,000, including  $240,000  of
depreciation  expense, in 2000 and a loss of $306,000,  including
$239,000 of depreciation expense, in 1999.  Since Strehlow  is  a
low  income  housing  property, rents are fixed  in  relation  to
specified  income levels.  As a result, similar  to  Registrant's
other  low-income  properties,  the  property  experiences   high
occupancy levels but rental income remains low.  The increase  in
loss  from  2000  to  2001  is due to an  increase  in  operating
expenses and a decrease in rental income. The decrease in  rental
income is due to a decrease in average occupancy and the increase
in  operating expense is due to an increase in utilities  expense
and  management fees. The increase in loss from 1999 to  2000  is
due  to  a decrease in rental income and an increase in operating
expenses.  The decrease in rental income is due to a decrease  in
average occupancy and the increase in operating expenses  is  due
to  an  increase in legal fees.  Legal fees increased due to  HUD
foreclosure proceedings.

              Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed  by  the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

              In 2001, Registrant incurred a loss of $314,000  at
Canal  House, including $400,000 of depreciation and amortization
expense compared to a loss of $344,000 including depreciation and
amortization expense of $396,000 in 2000 and a loss  of  $447,000
including  depreciation and amortization expense of  $455,000  in
1999.   The  decrease in loss from 2000 to  2001  is  due  to  an
increase  in  rental income, partially offset by an  increase  in
operating  expense. The increase in rental income is  due  to  an
increase  in  average rental rates and the increase in  operating
expense  is due to an increase in commission's expense  and  real
estate tax expense. The decrease in loss from 1999 to 2000 is due
to  an  increase in rental income and a decrease in  amortization
expense,  partially offset by an increase in operating  expenses.
The  increase in rental income is due to an increase  in  average
occupancy and the decrease in amortization expense is due to  the
full  amortization  of  loan  costs  in  1999.  The  increase  in
operating  expenses is due to an increase in commissions  expense
and  accounting  expense,  due  to  the  accrual  of  prior  year
accounting fees.

             Summary of Equity Method Investments

              In  2001, Registrant incurred a loss of $11,000  at
Saunders Apartments compared to a loss of $20,000 in 2000  and  a
loss  of $19,000 in 1999.  The decrease in loss from 2000 to 2001
is  due  to  an  increase  in rental income  and  a  decrease  in
maintenance expense. The increase in rental income is due  to  an
increase in occupancy and the decrease in maintenance expense  is
due  to  a decrease in apartment preparation expenses and repairs
expense.  The  increase in loss from 1999 to 2000 is  due  to  an
increase  in  maintenance  expense. The increase  in  maintenance
expense  is  due to an increase in cleaning service  and  repairs
expense.

               On    June  30,  2002,  the  Registrant  sold  its
investment  in Saunders Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds  of
the   sale  were  used  to  pay  the  accrued  expenses  of   the
partnership.


Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
         About Market Risk
         ------------------------------------------

           All  of our assets and liabilities are denominated  in
U.S.  dollars,  and  as  a result, we do  not  have  exposure  to
currency exchange risks.

          We do not engage in any interest rate, foreign currency
exchange rate or commodity price-hedging transactions, and  as  a
result, we do not have exposure to derivatives risk.


Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
          -------------------------------------------

          Registrant is not required to furnish the supplementary
financial information referred to in Item 302 of Regulations S-K.


<PAGE>


Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm
-----------------------------------------------------------------

To the Partners of Diversified Historic Investors VI
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


We  have  audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet  of
Diversified   Historic  Investors  VI  (a  Pennsylvania   limited
partnership)  and subsidiaries as of December 31,  2001  and  the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and
cash   flows  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2001.   These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility  of  the
Partnership's  management.  Our responsibility is to  express  an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.  We did
not audit the financial statements of Strehlow Terrace Apartments
Limited Partnership, which reflect total assets of $3,103,198  as
of  December 31, 2001 and total revenues of $262,574 for the year
then  ended.   In  addition,  we  did  not  audit  the  financial
statements  of  Mater Dolorosa General Partnership which  reflect
assets  of $1,509,658 as of December 31, 2001 and total  revenues
of  $426,567  for  the  year then ended.  Those  statements  were
audited  by  other auditors whose reports have been furnished  to
us,  and  our  opinion,  insofar as it  relates  to  the  amounts
included  Strehlow  Terrace Apartments  Limited  Partnership  and
Mater  Dolorosa  General  Partnership, is  based  solely  on  the
reports of the other auditors.

We  have conducted our audit in accordance with standards of  the
Public  Company  Accounting Oversight  Board  (United  States  of
America).  These standards require that we plan and  perform  the
audit   to   obtain  reasonable  assurance  about   whether   the
consolidated   financial  statements   are   free   of   material
misstatement.   An  audit includes examining, on  a  test  basis,
evidence   supporting  the  amounts  and   disclosures   in   the
consolidated  financial  statements.   An  audit  also   includes
assessing   the   accounting  principles  used  and   significant
estimates  made by management, as well as evaluating the  overall
financial  statement  presentation.  We believe  that  our  audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  based on our audits and the reports  of  other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present  fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of  Diversified Historic Investors VI as of December 31, 2001 and
the  results  of  operations and cash flows for  the  year  ended
December  31,  2001  in  conformity  with  accounting  principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.  The Schedule
of  Real  Estate  and  Accumulated Depreciation  on  page  38  is
presented for the purposes of additional analysis and  is  not  a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information
has  been  subjected to the auditing procedures  applied  in  the
audit  of  the  consolidated financial  statements  and,  in  our
opinion,  which  insofar  as  it  relates  to  Strehlow   Terrace
Apartments   Limited  Partnership  and  Mater  Dolorosa   General
Partnership  is  based  on  the report of  other  auditors,  such
information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the partnership will continue as a going concern.  In recent
years,  the  partnership  has incurred  significant  losses  from
operations,  which raise substantial doubt about its  ability  to
continue  as a going concern, which is detailed in NOTE  C.   The
financial  statements do not include any adjustments  that  might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.




/s/Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, New York
February 14, 2006

<PAGE>



                  Independent Auditor's Report
                  ----------------------------

To the Partners of Diversified Historic Investors VI


We  have  audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet  of
Diversified   Historic  Investors  VI  (a  Pennsylvania   limited
partnership)  and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000  and  1999
and  the  related statements of operations, changes in  partners'
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999
and  1998.   These  consolidated  financial  statements  are  the
responsibility    of   the   Partnership's    management.     Our
responsibility  is  to  express an  opinion  on  these  financial
statements  based on our audit.  We did not audit  the  financial
statements  of  Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited  Partnership,
which  reflect  total assets of $3,336,607 and $3,571,480  as  of
December  31,  2000 and 1999 and total revenues of  $364,615  and
$367,606,  respectively, for the years then ended.  In  addition,
we  did  not  audit  the financial statements of  Mater  Dolorosa
General  Partnership  which  reflect  assets  of  $1,625,365  and
$1,740,784 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and total revenues of
$429,229  and $417,626, respectively, for the years  then  ended.
Those  statements  were audited by other auditors  whose  reports
have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates
to  the  amounts  included  Strehlow Terrace  Apartments  Limited
Partnership  and  Mater  Dolorosa General Partnership,  is  based
solely on the reports of the other auditors.

We  conducted  our  audit in accordance with  auditing  standards
generally  accepted  in  the United  States  of  America.   These
standards  require that we plan and perform the audit  to  obtain
reasonable  assurance  about whether the  consolidated  financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit  includes
examining,  on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts  and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.   An  audit
also  includes  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and
significant  estimates made by management, as well as  evaluating
the  overall  financial statement presentation.  We believe  that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  based on our audits and the reports  of  other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present  fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of  Diversified Historic Investors VI as of December 31, 2000 and
1999,  and the results of operations and cash flows for the years
ended  December  31,  2000,  1999 and  1998  in  conformity  with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States  of
America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.  The Schedule
of  Real  Estate  and  Accumulated Depreciation  on  page  35  is
presented for the purposes of additional analysis and  is  not  a
required   part   of   the  basic  financial  statements.    Such
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audit of the consolidated financial statements and, in our
opinion,  which  insofar  as  it  relates  to  Strehlow   Terrace
Apartments   Limited  Partnership  and  Mater  Dolorosa   General
Partnership  is  based  on  the report of  other  auditors,  such
information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the partnership will continue as a going concern.  In recent
years,  the  partnership  has incurred  significant  losses  from
operations,  which raise substantial doubt about its  ability  to
continue  as  a going concern.  The financial statements  do  not
include  any  adjustments that might result from the  outcome  of
this uncertainty.




Gross, Kreger & Passio, L.L.C.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 1, 2001

<PAGE>

                  Independent Auditor's Report
                  ----------------------------

To the Partners of
Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership

We  have  audited  the accompanying balance  sheets  of  Strehlow
Terrace  Apartments  Limited  Partnership,  (a  Nebraska  limited
partnership), FHA Project No. 103-94006, as of December 31,  2001
and  2000,  and  the related statements of operations,  partners'
deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements   are   the   responsibility  of   the   Partnership's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits in accordance with auditing  standards
generally  accepted  in the United States of America,  Government
Auditing  Standards,  issued by the Comptroller  General  of  the
United States, and the Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD
Programs  (the  Guide) issued by the Department  of  Housing  and
Urban  Development,  Office  of  the  Inspector  General.   Those
standards  and  that guide require that we plan and  perform  the
audit  to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit  includes
examining,  on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts  and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.   An  audit
also  includes  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and
significant  estimates made by management, as well as  evaluating
the  overall  financial statement presentation.  We believe  that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the  financial statements  referred  to  above
present  fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of  Strehlow  Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership at  December
31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes  in
partners'  deficit and cash flows for the years  then  ended,  in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming
that  the  Partnership  will continue as  a  going  concern.   As
discussed  in Note F to the financial statements, the Partnership
has  incurred significant losses since its formation  to  operate
Strehlow  Terrace Apartments beginning in 1990.  The  Partnership
has  experienced a deficiency in cash flows resulting in past due
mortgage  principal, interest and escrow payments.  In  addition,
work-out  opportunities with the Department of Housing and  Urban
Development  (HUD) have been suspended.  These  conditions  raise
substantial  doubt  about its ability  to  continue  as  a  going
concern.  Management's plans in regard to these matters are  also
described in Note F.  The financial statements do not include any
adjustments   that  might  result  from  the  outcome   of   this
uncertainty.

In   accordance  with  Government  Auditing  Standards  and   the
Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD Programs, we have also
issued  a report dated May 28, 2002 on our consideration  of  the
Partnership's  internal control structure and reports  dated  May
28,  2002 on its compliance with specific requirements applicable
to Fair Housing and Non-discrimination, and specific requirements
applicable to its major HUD program and its non-major HUD program
transactions.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
financial   statements  taken  as  a  whole.   The  supplementary
information is presented for the purposes of additional  analysis
and  is  not  a required part of the basic financial  statements.
Such  information  has been subjected to the auditing  procedures
applied  in the audits of the basic financial statements and,  in
our  opinion,  is  fairly  stated in  all  material  respects  in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

Blackman & Associates, P.C.
Omaha, Nebraska
May 28, 2002
<PAGE>


                  Independent Auditor's Report
                  ----------------------------

To the Partners of
Mater Dolorosa General Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mater Dolorosa
General  Partnership,  for December 31, 2001  and  2000  and  the
related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows
for  the  years then ended.  These financial statements  are  the
responsibility    of   the   partnership's    management.     Our
responsibility  is  to express an opinion on  these  consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits in accordance with auditing  standards
generally  accepted  in  the United  States  of  America.   Those
standards  require that we plan and perform the audits to  obtain
reasonable  assurance about whether the financial statements  are
free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test  basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures  in
the  consolidated financial statements.  An audit  also  includes
assessing   the   accounting  principles  used  and   significant
estimates  made by management, as well as evaluating the  overall
financial  statement presentation.  We believe  that  our  audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the  financial statements  referred  to  above
present  fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Mater Dolorosa General Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and
2000,  and  the results of its operations and its cash flows  for
the  years  then  ended  in  conformity with  generally  accepted
accounting principles.

Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Metairie, Louisiana
February 20, 2002

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

              INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
              ------------------------------------------

                   AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
                   ---------------------------------





Consolidated financial statements:                           Page
                                                             ----

     Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2001 and     24
2000

     Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years      25
Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999

     Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners'          26
Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999

     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years      27
Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999

     Notes to consolidated financial statements             28-36


Financial statement schedules:

     Schedule XI - Real Estate and Accumulated               38
Depreciation

     Notes to Schedule XI                                    49





All  other  schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or   the  required  information  is  shown  in  the  consolidated
financial statements or notes thereto.

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                      ---------------------------
                      December 31, 2001 and 2000

                                Assets
                                ------

                                              2001           2000
                                              ----           ----

Cash and cash equivalents               $    38,973   $    46,215
Restricted cash                             305,995       365,806
Accounts receivable                          54,382        38,636
Investment in affiliate                           0       (48,006)
Other assets (net of accumulated
 amortization of $819,993 and $751,489)     394,824       388,146
                                        -----------   -----------
                                            794,174       790,797
                                        -----------   -----------
Rental properties at cost:
 Land                                       950,238       950,238
 Buildings and improvements              27,280,952    27,373,551
 Furniture and fixtures                     970,440       776,142
                                        -----------   -----------
                                         29,201,630    29,099,931
Less - accumulated depreciation         (14,365,627)  (13,243,935)
                                        -----------   -----------
                                         14,836,003    15,855,996
                                        -----------   -----------
         Total                          $15,630,177   $16,646,793
                                        ===========   ===========


                 Liabilities and Partners' Equity
                 --------------------------------

Liabilities:
 Debt obligations                       $16,616,789   $16,857,962
 Accounts payable:
  Trade                                   1,423,037     1,321,939
  Taxes                                      21,780        20,465
  Related parties                           481,605       446,202
  Other                                      87,830        10,824
 Interest payable                         2,022,602     1,618,641
 Tenant security deposits                   134,442       168,550
 Advances                                    35,720             0
                                        -----------   -----------
         Total liabilities               20,823,805    20,444,583
Partners' deficit                        (5,193,628)   (3,797,790)
                                        -----------   -----------
         Total                          $15,630,177   $16,646,793
                                        ===========   ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>



                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                 -------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

                                      2001         2000         1999
                                      ----         ----         ----

Revenues:
 Rental income                    $2,434,782  $2,445,698    $2,373,232
 Other income                         11,523           0        10,670
 Interest income                       4,681       6,966         3,677
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
         Total revenues            2,450,986   2,452,664     2,387,579
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
Costs and expenses:
  Rental operations                1,247,800   1,192,754     1,123,015
  General and administrative               0           0       256,142
  Interest                         1,397,720   1,398,919     1,411,077
  Depreciation and amortization    1,190,197   1,178,867     1,229,432
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
         Total costs and expenses  3,835,717   3,770,540     4,019,666
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------

Loss before equity in affiliate   (1,384,731) (1,317,876)   (1,632,087)
Equity in net loss of affiliate      (11,107)    (20,228)      (18,807)
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
Net loss                         ($1,395,838)($1,338,104)  ($1,650,894)
                                  ==========  ==========    ==========

Net loss per limited partnership
 unit:
 Loss before equity in affiliate ($    53.84) ($   51.24)  ($    63.46)
 Equity in net loss of affiliate       (0.43)      (0.79)        (0.73)
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
                                 ($    54.27)($    52.03)  ($    64.19)
                                  ==========  ==========    ==========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>




                    DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                    ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' EQUITY
        ------------------------------------------------------
         For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999


                                      Dover
                                    Historic
                                    Advisors     Limited
                                     VI (I)    Partners (2)    Total
                                    --------   ------------    -----

Percentage participation in
 profit or loss                       1%           99%          100%
                                      ==           ===          ====

Balance at December 31, 1997      ($194,274)  $1,832,774     $1,638,500
Net loss                            (24,473)  (2,422,819)    (2,447,292)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 1998       (218,747)    (590,045)      (808,792)
Net loss                            (16,509)  (1,634,385)    (1,650,894)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 1999       (235,256)  (2,224,430)    (2,459,686)
Net loss                            (13,381)  (1,324,723)    (1,338,104)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 2000       (248,637)  (3,549,153)    (3,797,790)
Net loss                            (13,958)  (1,381,880)    (1,395,838)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 2001      ($262,595) ($4,931,033)   ($5,193,628)
                                   ========   ==========     ==========


 (1) General Partner.

 (2)  25,461  limited partnership units outstanding at  December  31,
      2001, 2000, and 1999.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>

                    DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                    ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                 -------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999


                                          2001      2000         1999
                                          ----      ----         ----

Cash flows from operating
 activities:
 Net loss                           ($1,395,838) ($1,338,104)($1,650,894)
 Adjustments to reconcile net
  loss to net cash provided by
  operating activities:
 Depreciation and amortization        1,190,197   1,178,867    1,229,432
 Equity in loss of affiliate             11,107      20,228       18,807
 Changes in assets and liabilities:
  Decrease (increase) in
   restricted cash                       59,811        (175)     (84,734)
  (Increase in accounts receivable      (15,746)          0            0
  (Increase) decrease in other assets   (75,183)     (9,447)      12,374
  Increase in investment in affiliates  (48,006)          0            0
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - trade                       65,899      (1,237)     241,400
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - taxes                        1,315       1,668       (1,695)
  Increase in accounts payable -
   related party                         47,674      29,693       19,980
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - other                       88,827     (40,283)      24,068
  Increase in interest payable          403,961     443,163      304,836
  (Decrease) increase in tenant
   security deposits                    (34,108)     30,866        7,826
  Increase in advances                   35,720           0            0
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
      Net cash provided by
       operating activities             335,630     315,239      121,400
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
 Capital improvements                  (101,699)    (89,844)     (25,416)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
      Net cash used in
       investing activities            (101,699)    (89,844)     (25,416)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------

Cash flows from financing activities:
 Proceeds from debt financing                 0           0       25,416
 Principal payments                    (241,173)   (219,779)    (108,865)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
      Net cash used in
       financing activities            (241,173)   (219,779)     (83,449)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
(Decrease) increase in cash and
 cash equivalents                        (7,242)      5,616       12,535
Cash and cash equivalents at
 beginning of year                       46,215      40,599       28,064
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end
 of year                             $   38,973   $  46,215   $   40,599
                                     ==========   =========   ==========

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information:
  Cash paid during the year for      $1,397,720  $1,398,919   $1,106,241
interest

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>



                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

              NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
              ------------------------------------------


NOTE A - ORGANIZATION
---------------------

Diversified Historic Investors VI (the "Partnership"), a  limited
partnership, was formed in January 1988 to acquire, rehabilitate,
renovate,  manage, operate, hold, sell, exchange,  and  otherwise
deal  in  and with real properties containing improvements  which
are  "certified historic structures" as defined in  the  Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), or which are eligible for  the
tax  credit  provided by Section 42 of the Code, and  such  other
uses  as Dover Historic Advisors VI (the "General Partner") deems
appropriate, and to engage in any and all activities  related  or
incidental   thereto.    Rehabilitations   undertaken   by    the
Partnership  were done with a view to obtaining certification  of
expenditures  therefor as "qualified rehabilitation expenditures"
as defined in the Code.


NOTE B - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
---------------------------------------

A  summary  of  the significant accounting policies  consistently
applied  in  the  preparation  of the  accompanying  consolidated
financial statements follows:

1.   Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the
Partnership  and  five  subsidiary partnerships  ("Ventures")  in
which the Partnership has controlling interests, with appropriate
elimination  of inter-partnership transactions and balances.   In
addition, the Partnership owns a minority interest of 30% in  one
partnership,  which  it  accounts  for  on  the  equity   method.
Allocations  of  income and loss to the minority  owners  of  the
Ventures  will  be  made until and unless the  cumulative  losses
applicable   to  the  minority  interests  exceed  the   minority
interests in the equity capital of the Ventures.  These financial
statements  reflect all adjustments (consisting  only  of  normal
recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of the Partnership's
General  partner,  are  necessary for a  fair  statement  of  the
results for those years.

2.   Depreciation

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over  the
estimated useful lives of the assets.  Buildings and improvements
are  depreciated  over 25 years and furniture and  fixtures  over
five years.

3.   Net Loss Per Partnership Unit

The  net  loss  per  limited partnership unit  is  based  on  the
weighted  average number of limited partnership units outstanding
(25,461 units in 2001, 2000 and 1999).
4.   Costs of Issuance

Costs  incurred  in  connection with the  offering  and  sale  of
limited  partnership units were charged against partners'  equity
as incurred.

5.   Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid instruments purchased
with a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents.

6.   Income Taxes

Income  taxes  or credits resulting from earnings or  losses  are
payable   by   or  accrue  to  the  benefits  of  the   partners;
accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes in these
financial statements.

6.   Restricted Cash

Restricted  cash  includes  amounts  held  for  tenant   security
deposits and real estate tax reserves.

7.   Revenue Recognition

Revenues  are  recognized  when rental  payments  are  due  on  a
straight-line  basis.  Rental payments received  in  advance  are
deferred until earned.

8.   Rental Properties

Rental properties are stated at cost.  A provision for impairment
of value is recorded when a decline in the value of a property is
determined to be other than temporary as a result of one or  more
of  the following: (1) a property is offered for sale at a  price
below  its current carrying value, (2) a property has significant
balloon  payments  due within the foreseeable  future  which  the
Partnership  does not have the resources to meet, and anticipates
it  will  be  unable  to  obtain replacement  financing  or  debt
modification  sufficient  to allow it to  continue  to  hold  the
property  over  a reasonable period of time, (3) a  property  has
been,   and  is  expected  to  continue,  generating  significant
operating deficits and the Partnership is unable or unwilling  to
sustain  such deficit results of operations, and has been  unable
to,   or   anticipates  it  will  be  unable  to,   obtain   debt
modification, financing or refinancing sufficient to allow it  to
continue to hold the property for a reasonable period of time or,
(4)  a  property's  value  has  declined  based  on  management's
expectations  with respect to projected future  operational  cash
flows and prevailing economic conditions.  An impairment loss  is
indicated  when  the  undiscounted sum of estimated  future  cash
flows  from  an  asset, including estimated sales  proceeds,  and
assuming a reasonable period of ownership up to 5 years, is  less
than  the carrying amount of the asset.  The impairment  loss  is
measured  as the difference between the estimated fair value  and
the  carrying  amount of the asset. In the absence of  the  above
circumstances,  properties and improvements are stated  at  cost.
An  analysis is done on an annual basis at December  31  of  each
year.

9.   Use of Estimates

The  preparation  of the financial statements in conformity  with
generally  accepted accounting principles requires management  to
make  estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts  reported
in  the  financial  statements and  accompanying  notes.   Actual
results could differ from those estimates.


NOTE C - GOING CONCERN
----------------------

The accompanying statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis,  which  contemplates the realization  of  assets  and  the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  As
shown  in  the consolidated financial statements during the  year
ended  December  31,  2001,  the  Company  incurred  losses  from
continuing operations of $1,395,838. The current Company's  total
liabilities  exceeded  its  total  assets  by  $5,193,628.  These
factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable
to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

The Company's existence is dependent upon management's ability to
develp  profitable operations and resolve its liquidity problems.
The  Company  is  also currently negotiating flexibility  in  its
payments  with its various lenders, but there can be no assurance
the   Company  will  be  successful  in  these  discussions.  The
accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments  that might result should the Company  be  unable  to
continue as a going concern.


NOTE D - LEASES
---------------

The  Partnership's leases with commercial tenants are  classified
as  operating leases.  Leases are generally for a period of three
to  five  years and provide for a fixed base rent plus contingent
rents  based  on level of sales and sharing of certain  operating
costs.

Minimum  future  commercial rentals on  operating  leases  as  of
December 31, 2001 are as follows:

                 2002     $677,763
                 2003      353,370
                 2004      247,655
                 2005      208,465
                 2006       70,446


NOTE E - PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
------------------------------

The  significant terms of the amended and restated  Agreement  of
Limited  Partnership (the "Agreement"), as  they  relate  to  the
financial statements, follow:

1.   Capital Contributions

The  partnership offered investors limited partnership  units  at
$1,000  per  unit;  the minimum purchase per investor  was  three
units.   A  total of 25,461 limited partnership units  was  sold.
After  payment  of  costs  of issuance as  provided  for  in  the
Agreement  and  the  withdrawal of the initial  limited  partner,
initial  partnership  capital  net  of  costs  of  issuance   was
$22,181,070  from  limited partners and $9,900 from  the  General
Partner.

2.   Distributions from Operations

The  Agreement  provides that, beginning with  the  date  of  the
admission  of  subscribers as limited partners, all distributable
cash from operations (as defined) will be distributed 99% to  the
limited partners and 1% to the General Partner.  After cash flows
from  operations  are positive, the General  Partner  shall  also
receive  4%  of such cash flows exclusive of interest  earned  on
investments.

All  distributable  cash  from  sales  or  dispositions  will  be
distributed to the limited partners up to their adjusted invested
capital plus an amount equal to the sum of the greater of an 8.5%
cumulative,  non-compounded annual return on the  average  after-
credit invested capital or a 6% cumulative, non-compounded annual
return  on the average adjusted invested capital, plus  an  early
investor   incentive,   less  amounts   previously   distributed;
thereafter,  after  receipt  by  the  General  Partner   or   its
affiliates  of  any  accrued  but unpaid  real  estate  brokerage
commissions, the balance will be distributed 85% to  the  limited
partners  and 15% to the General Partner.  Terms used  throughout
this paragraph are as defined under the Agreement.

3.   Allocation of Net Income and Net Losses from Operations

Net income and net loss (as defined) will be allocated 99% to the
limited  partners  and  1% to the General  Partner  with  certain
exceptions as defined in the Agreement.

The  Agreement  provides that the fiscal year of the  Partnership
will be the calendar year and that the Partnership shall continue
until  December  31,  2038,  unless sooner  terminated  upon  the
occurrence of certain events.


NOTE F - ACQUISITION
--------------------

The Partnership acquired one property and five general or limited
partnership interests in Ventures during the period from  January
7,  1988  to  December  1988, and one  general  and  one  limited
partnership interest in Ventures in 1989, as discussed below.

In  July  1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a 98%  general
partner  and a 1% limited partner interest, to a Nebraska limited
partnership  which  owns a building located in  Omaha,  Nebraska,
consisting of 17 apartment units, for a cash capital contribution
of $700,000.  In addition, $128,284 in acquisition costs relating
to  the  investment  were capitalized as part  of  buildings  and
improvements.

In  July  1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a 90%  general
partner interest, to a Louisiana general partnership which owns a
building  located  in New Orleans, Louisiana,  consisting  of  68
apartment  units, for a cash capital contribution of  $1,519,000.
In  addition,  $241,173  of acquisition  costs  relating  to  the
investment   were   capitalized  as   part   of   buildings   and
improvements.  During 1990, as permanent financing was  obtained,
$60,000  of  the  capital  contribution  was  returned   to   the
Partnership.

In  December  1988, the Partnership acquired a 99% joint  venture
interest  in  a  Nebraska joint venture  which  owns  a  building
located in Omaha, Nebraska, consisting of 23 apartment units, for
a  cash  capital contribution of $875,000.  In addition, $153,940
in  acquisition costs relating to the investment were capitalized
as  part of buildings and improvements.  These capitalized  costs
have  been removed from the balance sheet.  Pursuant to the  June
1993   Amended   and  Restated  Joint  Venture   Agreement,   the
Partnership's interest was reduced to 30%.

In  December  1988,  the Partnership was  admitted,  with  a  97%
general  partner  and a 1% limited partner interest,  to  a  West
Virginia  limited partnership which owned a building  located  in
Huntington, West Virginia, consisting of 53 apartment  units  and
41,590  square  feet of commercial space, for a  general  partner
cash  capital contribution of $1,470,000 and limited partner cash
capital  contribution  of  $10,000.   In  addition,  $492,609  of
acquisition costs relating to the investment were capitalized  as
part of building and improvements.  The lender foreclosed on  the
property in October 1994.

In  December  1988,  the Partnership was  admitted,  with  a  90%
general partner interest, to a Virginia general partnership which
owns  a  building located in Alexandria, Virginia, consisting  of
32,544  square  feet  of commercial space,  for  a  cash  capital
contribution of $1,750,000.  In addition, $436,164 in acquisition
costs relating to the investment have been capitalized as part of
buildings  and  improvements.  In 1990, the Partnership  made  an
additional cash contribution of $196,621 pursuant to an agreement
with the co-general partner.

In  December 1988, the Partnership purchased 78 condominium units
and  6,700  square  feet  of commercial space  located  in  North
Carolina  for  $5,042,000.  In addition, $774,258 of  acquisition
costs  relating  to  the  property were capitalized  as  part  of
buildings  and improvements.  On January 21, 1994,  the  property
was  transferred to a Pennsylvania limited partnership  in  which
the  partnership  owns a 99% interest.  On March  14,  1997,  the
Registrant  was  declared in default on the  first  mortgage  for
failure to make the minimum monthly payment.  On March 31,  1997,
a  settlement  agreement was reached whereby the  Registrant  has
agreed  to  relinquish its partnership interests in  the  limited
partnership in lieu of foreclosure.

In January 1989, the Partnership was admitted, with a 98% general
partner interest, to a Nebraska general partnership which owns  a
building  located in Omaha, Nebraska, consisting of 70 apartments
units,  for  a  cash  capital  contribution  of  $2,250,000.   In
addition,   $448,993  of  acquisition  costs  relating   to   the
investment   were   capitalized  as   part   of   buildings   and
improvements.

In  February  1989,  the Partnership was  admitted,  with  a  99%
general  partner interest, to a Pennsylvania limited  partnership
which   owns   a  building  located  in  Manayunk,  Pennsylvania,
consisting  of  73  apartment units  and  8,471  square  feet  of
commercial  space,  for  a  total cash  capital  contribution  of
$6,000,000,  less funds advanced prior to admittance  ($2,431,552
at  December  31,  1988).  In addition, $664,509  of  acquisition
costs  relating  to the investment were capitalized  as  part  of
buildings   and  improvements.   The  building  was  subsequently
converted to a condominium, with the Partnership retaining  title
to  all  property.  During 1990, the Partnership made  additional
cash contributions of $220,000.


NOTE G - DEBT OBLIGATIONS
-------------------------

Debt obligations were as follows:                  December 31,
                                                 2000        2001
                                                 ----        ----

Note   payable,   non-interest   bearing;    $  500,000 $  500,000
principal  due  upon  sale  of  property;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.


Note payable, interest at 7.75% and 9.16%             0      8,784
at  December 31, 1999 and 1998,  adjusted
every  three years, based upon the three-
year  Treasury Bill rate plus  250  basis
points,     payable    in     semi-annual
installments of principal and interest of
$4,856  (payment adjusted  in  accordance
with  interest  rate  changes);  due   in
November 2001; collateralized by  related
rental property.

Note   payable,  interest  at  7.75%   at      323,279     331,957
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively;
payable   in   monthly  installments   of
principal and interest of $3,083; due  in
August  2006; collateralized  by  related
rental property.

Note  payable, interest at 8.5%;  payable     612,116     764,501
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of $17,627; due in April  2005;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Mortgage  loan, interest accrues  at  7%;    4,367,913    4,367,913
interest  only  payable  monthly  to  the
extent  of net operating income;  due  in
December  2008;  collateralized  by   the
related rental property

Mortgage loan, interest at 7.08%; payable    1,849,227    1,880,725
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of  $21,471;  due  in  November
2008;   collateralized  by  the   related
rental property.

Note  payable, non-interest bearing;  due      75,000        75,000
upon sale of property; collateralized  by
related rental property.

Note payable, interest at 10.25%; payable   1,775,053     1,775,053
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of $15,540; due in March  2030;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Note payable, interest at 1% accruing  to   1,700,000     1,700,000
principal; unpaid principal and  interest
are  due  upon  sale of  property  or  in
January  2030; collateralized by  related
rental property.

Note  payable, interest at 18%;  interest   1,520,117     1,520,117
only payable monthly to the extent of net
operating  income;  due  December   2002;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property. (A)

Note payable, interest at 7.22%; interest
only  payable  monthly in the  amount  of
$27,206; due January 2009; collateralized
by related rental property.                    3,894,084   3,933,912
                                             ----------- -----------

                                             $16,616,789 $16,857,962
                                             =========== ===========

The  Company  is in violations with certain loan convenants  with
some  of the underlying mortgages. Hence all mortgages/notes have
been classified as short term.

Maturities  of  debt obligation at December  31,  2001,  were  as
follows:

          Year ending December 31,
          ------------------------

                 2002              $ 1,520,117
                 2003                        0
                 2004                        0
                 2005                  612,116
                 2006                  323,279
                 Thereafter         14,161,277
                                   -----------
                                   $16,616,789
                                   ===========


NOTE H - RELATED PARTIES
------------------------

In  June  1998,  the  General Partner  advanced  the  Partnership
$77,975   to   pay   certain  outstanding  liabilities   of   the
Partnership.   The advance is non-interest bearing  and  will  be
paid out of available cash flow.

Included  in  Accounts  Payable - Related Party  is  $378,630  at
December  31, 2001 owed to the co - general partner, by three  of
the  Partnership's Ventures, for additional amounts advanced  for
working  capital needs.  These advances are non-interest  bearing
and will be paid out of available cash flow.

Included  in  Accounts  Payable - Related  Party  is  $25,000  at
December  31,  2001 owed to the general partner, by  two  of  the
Partnership's  Ventures,  for  additional  amounts  advanced  for
working  capital needs.  These advances are non-interest  bearing
and will be paid out of available cash flow.



NOTE I - INCOME TAX BASIS RECONCILIATION
----------------------------------------

Certain  items  enter into the determination of  the  results  of
operations  in  different  time periods for  financial  reporting
("book")   purposes   and  for  income  tax   ("tax")   purposes.
Reconciliations of net loss and partners' equity follow:

                                      For the Years Ended December 31,

                                        2001        2000        1999
                                        ----        ----        ----

Net loss - book                  ($1,395,838)  ($1,338,104)($1,650,894)
Excess of tax under book
 depreciation                        405,107       283,161     458,619
Interest                             114,148       103,804      94,398
Loss on foreclosure                        0             0           0
Gain on sale                               0             0           0
Administrative expenses                    0             0           0
Other timing differences               3,492        20,228      18,807
Minority interest - tax only          95,976        86,705     218,951
                                  ----------    ----------  ----------
Net loss - tax                   ($  777,115)  ($  844,206)($  860,119)
                                  ==========    ==========  ==========


Partners' equity - book          ($5,193,628)  ($3,797,789)($2,459,686)
Costs of issuance                  3,279,930     3,279,930   3,279,930
Cumulative tax under book loss     6,805,198     6,186,474   5,692,577
Investment credit recapture            9,900         9,900       9,900
Rehabilitation credit               (251,117)     (251,117)   (251,117)
                                  ----------    ----------  ----------
Partner's equity - tax            $4,650,283    $5,427,398  $6,271,604
                                  ==========    ==========  ==========



NOTE J- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
-------------------------

Strehlow  Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the Department  of
Housing  and  Urban  Development,  the  guarantor  of  the  first
mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

On   June  30,  2002,  the  partnership sold  its  investment  in
Saunders  Apartments  for $25,000.

<PAGE>




                       SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION



<PAGE>
                  DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   --------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)



          SCHEDULE XI - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
                                DECEMBER 31, 2001
          ------------------------------------------------------

                                                      Costs
                                                   Capitalized
                                                   Subsequent
                            Initial Cost to            to
                            Partnership (b)        Acquisition
                            ---------------        -----------


                                         Buildings
                                            and              Date of
                 Encumbrances            Improve-  Improve-   Contr.   Date
Description (a)      (e)       Land (b)   ments      ments     (a)   Acquired
---------------  ------------  --------  --------- --------  ------- --------
17 unit apartments
and 3,000 square
feet of retail
space in Omaha, NE $  823,279 $10,000  $ 1,774,986 $   61,868  1988    7/88

68 unit apartments
in New Orleans, LA    612,116    -       2,948,634    471,015  1988    7/88

32,500 square feet
of
commercial space in
Alexandria, VA      6,217,140 540,238    5,014,827  1,336,272  1988   12/88

70 apartment units
in Omaha, NE        3,550,053    -         448,993  5,979,828  1989    1/89

71 unit apartments
and 8,500 square
feet of
commercial space in
Manayunk, PA        5,414,201  400,000     664,508    9,550,461 1989   2/89
                  ----------- -------- -----------  -----------
                  $16,616,789 $950,238 $10,851,948  $17,399,444
                  =========== ======== ===========  ===========

                             Gross Amount at which Carried at
                                    December 31, 2001
                             --------------------------------


                               Buildings                Accumu-
                                  and                    lated
                                Improv-      Total       Depr.
Description (a)       Land       ments      (c) (d)     (d) (e)
--------------        ----     ---------    -------    --------
17 unit apartments
and 3,000 square
feet of retail
space in Omaha, NE  $ 10,000  $ 1,836,854 $ 1,846,854  $  917,938

68 unit apartments
in New Orleans, LA      -       3,419,649   3,419,649   1,741,527

32,500 square feet
of
commercial space in
Alexandria, VA      540,238     6,351,099   6,891,337   2,960,130

70 apartment units
in Omaha, NE           -        6,428,821   6,428,821   2,676,791

71 unit apartments
and 8,500 square
feet of
commercial space in
Manayunk, PA       400,000     10,214,969  10,614,969   4,885,111
                  --------    ----------- -----------  ----------
                  $950,238    $28,251,392 $29,201,630 $13,181,497
                  ========    =========== =========== ===========

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                      NOTES TO SCHEDULE XI

                        DECEMBER 31, 2001

(A)  All  properties are certified historic structures as defined
     in  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  of  1986.   The  "date  of
     construction" refers to the period in which such  properties
     were rehabilitated.

(B)  Represents costs of a parcel of land with historic  building
     located    thereon.    Amounts   do    not    include    any
     development/rehabilitation  costs  incurred  pursuant  to  a
     turnkey development agreement entered into when the property
     was purchased.

(C)  The  cost  of  real estate owned at December 31,  2001,  for
     Federal  income tax purposes was approximately  $24,696,289.
     The  depreciable  basis of the building and improvements  of
     the  properties  has  been reduced for  Federal  income  tax
     purposes by the historic rehabilitation credit.

(D)  Reconciliation of real estate:

                                        2001       2000        1999
                                        ----       ----        ----
Balance at beginning of year      $29,099,931 $29,010,088 $28,984,672
Additions during this year:
  Improvements                        101,699      89,843      25,416
Deductions during the year:
  Retirements                               0           0           0
                                  ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of year            $29,201,630 $29,099,931 $29,010,088
                                  =========== =========== ===========

Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:
                                        2001       2000        1999
                                        ----       ----        ----
Balance at beginning of year       13,234,935 $12,134,403 $11,038,617
Depreciation expense for the year   1,121,692   1,109,532   1,095,786
Retirements                                 0           0           0
                                  ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of year            $14,356,627 $13,243,935 $12,134,403
                                  =========== =========== ===========

(D)  See  Note  E  to  the consolidated financial statements  for
     further information.

(E)  See  Note  B  to  the consolidated financial statements  for
     depreciation method and lives.


Item  9.    Changes  in  and disagreements  with  Accountants  on
            Accounting and Financial Disclosure
            -----------------------------------------------------

          None.


Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
          -----------------------

          We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed  to          ensure  that  information  required  to  be
disclosed  in  our Securities Exchange Act of  1934   reports  is
recorded,  processed,  summarized and reported  within  the  time
periods   specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and  that  such
information   is   accumulated  and       communicated   to   our
management,   including   our   managing   partner's    principal
executive   officer   and   principal   financial   officer,   as
appropriate,  to  allow  timely  decisions   regarding   required
disclosure.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure  controls
and   procedures, our management recognized that any controls and
procedures,  no  matter    how well designed  and  operated,  can
provide  only  reasonable assurance of achieving     the  desired
control  objectives, and our management necessarily was  required
to   apply    its   judgment  in  evaluating   the   cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and   procedures.

           Under   the  supervision  of  our  managing  partner's
principal executive officer and    principal financial officer we
have  carried  out  an  evaluation of the  effectiveness  of  our
adopted disclosure controls and procedures as of the end  of  the
period covered by this   report.  Based upon that evaluation, our
managing  partner's president and treasurer   concluded that  our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

          There  have been no significant changes in our internal
controls  over financial  reporting that has materially affected,
or  is  reasonably likely to materially affect, our      internal
control  over  financial reporting during our most recent  fiscal
quarter.

<PAGE>


                            PART III
                            --------

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant
          ----------------------------------------------

          a.  Identification of Directors -  Registrant  has  no
directors.

          b. Identification of Executive Officers

              The  General  Partner of the  Registrant  is  Dover
Historic   Advisors   VI   (DoHA-VI),  a   Pennsylvania   general
partnership.  The partners of DoHA-VI are as follows:


                                  Term of
Name            Age  Position     Office      Period Served
----            ---  --------     -------     -------------

SWDHA, Inc.      --  Partner in   No fixed     Since May 1997
                     DoHA-VI      term

EPK, Inc.        --  Partner in   No fixed     Since May 1997
                     DoHA-VI      term


              For further description of DoHA - VI, see paragraph
e.  of  this  Item.   There  is no arrangement  or  understanding
between  either person named above and any other person  pursuant
to which any person was or is to be selected as an officer.

           c.  Identification  of Certain Significant  Employees.
Registrant  has no employees.  Its administrative and operational
functions  are carried out by property management and partnership
administration firm engaged by the Registrant.

           d.   Family  Relationships.   There  is   no   family
relationship between or among the executive officers  and/or  any
person  nominated or chosen by Registrant to become an  executive
officer.

           e.    Business  Experience.  DoHA-VI  is   a   general
partnership  formed in 1987.  The General Partner is  responsible
for  management and control of Registrant's affairs and will have
general   responsibility   and  authority   in   conducting   its
operations.   The  General Partner may retain its  affiliates  to
manage certain of the Properties.

         On May 13, 1997, SWDHA, Inc. replaced Gerald Katzoff and
EPK,  Inc.  replaced DHP, Inc. as partners of  DoHA-VI.   Spencer
Wertheimer, the President and Sole Director of SWDHA, Inc., is an
attorney  with  extensive experience in  real  estate  activities
ventures.

          EPK,  Inc.  is  a Delaware corporation formed  for  the
purpose  of managing properties or interests therein.  EPK,  Inc.
is  a wholly-owned subsidiary of D, LTD, an entity formed in 1985
to act as the holding company for various corporations engaged in
the   development   and  management  of  historically   certified
properties and conventional real estate as well as a provider  of
financial  (non-banking) services.  EPK, Inc. is an affiliate  of
DoHA-VI.

          The  officers and directors of EPK, Inc. are  described
below.

          Spencer  Wertheimer  was  appointed  May  13,  1997  as
President,  Treasurer  and  Sole  Director  of  EPK,  Inc.    Mr.
Wertheimer  is  an  attorney with extensive  experience  in  real
estate activities ventures.

          Donna M. Zanghi (age 43) was appointed on May 13,  1997
as  Vice  President  and  Secretary  of  EPK,  Inc.   Ms.  Zanghi
previously served as Secretary and Treasurer of DHP, Inc.   since
June  14,  1993 and as a Director and Secretary/Treasurer  of  D,
LTD.   She was associated with DHP, Inc. and its affiliates since
1984  except for the period from December 1986 to June  1989  and
the period from November 1, 1992 to June 14, 1993.

          Michele F. Rudoi (age 35) was appointed on May 13, 1997
as  Assistant Secretary of EPK, Inc.  Ms. Rudoi previously served
as  Assistant Secretary and Director of both D, LTD and DHP, Inc.
since January 27, 1993.


Item 11.  Executive Compensation
          ----------------------

           a. Cash Compensation - During 2001, Registrant paid no
cash  compensation to DoHA-VI, any partner therein or any  person
named in paragraph c. of Item 10.

           b. Compensation Pursuant to Plans - Registrant has  no
plan  pursuant  to  which compensation was  paid  or  distributed
during  2001,  or  is proposed to be paid or distributed  in  the
future,  to DoHA-VI, any partner therein, or any person named  in
paragraph c. of Item 10 of this report.

          c. Other Compensation - No compensation not referred to
in  paragraph  a.  or  paragraph b. of  this  Item  was  paid  or
distributed during 2001 to DoHA-VI, any partner therein,  or  any
person named in paragraph c. of Item 10.

          d.  Compensation  of  Directors -  Registrant  has  no
directors.

          e.  Termination  of Employment and Change  of  Control
Arrangement -
Registrant has no compensatory plan or arrangement, with  respect
to  any  individual,  which  results  or  will  result  from  the
resignation  or retirement of any individual, or any  termination
of  such individual's employment with Registrant or from a change
in  control  of  Registrant  or  a change  in  such  individual's
responsibilities following such a change in control.

Item  12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial  Owners  and
            Management
            -----------------------------------------------------

          a. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners - No
person is known to Registrant to be the beneficial owner of  more
than five percent of the issued and outstanding Units.

          b. Security Ownership of Management - None.

          c. Changes in Control - Registrant does not know of any
arrangement,  the  operation of which may at  a  subsequent  date
result in a change in control of Registrant.


Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
          ----------------------------------------------

           a.  Pursuant  to  Registrant's  Amended  and  Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership, DoHA-VI is entitled to  10%  of
Registrant's  distributable cash from operations  in  each  year.
There  was  no  such share allocable to DoHA-VI for fiscal  years
1997 through 2000.

           b. Certain Business Relationships - Registrant has  no
directors.   For a description of business relationships  between
Registrant  and certain affiliated persons, see paragraph  a.  of
this Item.

          c. Indebtedness of Management - No executive officer or
significant employee of Registrant, Registrant's general  partner
(or  any  employee thereof), or any affiliate of any such person,
is or has at any time been indebted to Registrant.

<PAGE>


                             PART IV
                             -------

Item 14. (A)     Exhibits,  Financial  Statement  Schedules   and
                 Reports on Form 8-K.

                 1.   Financial Statements:

                      a.   Consolidated  Balance  Sheets   at
                  December 31, 2001 and 2000

                      b.   Consolidated Statements of Operations
                 for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

                      c.   Consolidated Statements of Changes in
                 Partners'  Equity for the Years  Ended  December
                 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.

                      d.   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                 for  the Years Ended December 31, 2001 2000  and
                 1999.

                      e.   Notes  to  consolidated  financial
                 statements.


                 2.   Financial statement schedules:

                      a.   Schedule  XI  -  Real  Estate  and
                 Accumulated Depreciation

                      b.   Notes to Schedule XI


                3.   Exhibits:

                 Document         (a)    Exhibit  Number
                 --------         ----------------------

                 3                 Registrant's   Amended   and
                                   Restated   Certificate    of
                                   Limited   Partnership    and
                                   Agreement     of     Limited
                                   Partnership,      previously
                                   filed  as  part of Amendment
                                   No.    2   of   Registrant's
                                   Registration  Statement   on
                                   Form  S-11, are incorporated
                                   herein by reference.

               21                  Subsidiaries     of      the
                                   Registrant  are  listed   in
                                   Item  2. Properties of  this
                                   Form 10-K.

               31                  General   Partners   Opinion
                                   Certification

               32                  Certification Pursuant to 18
                                   U.S.C.   Section  1350,   As
                                   Adopted  Pursuant to Section
                                   906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley
                                   Act of 2002

                (b)  Reports on Form 8-K:

                 On June 27, 2005 the Registrant filed
                 Form  8-K reporting information under items 4.01
                 and  4.02  for  the period ending  December  31,
                 2001 and 2002.

               (c) Exhibits: See Item 14 (A) (3) above

<PAGE>

                           SIGNATURES
                           ----------

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of  the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has  duly  caused
this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf  by  the  undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.



Date: October 10, 2006     DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
      ----------------     ---------------------------------
                           By: Dover Historic Advisors VI, its
                               general partner

                               By: EPK, Inc., managing partner

                                   By: /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
                                       ----------------------
                                       SPENCER WERTHEIMER
                                       President (principal
                                       executive  officer,
                                       principal financial
                                       officer)




     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: October 10, 2006     DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
      ----------------     ---------------------------------
                           By: Dover Historic Advisors VI, its
                               general partner

                               By: EPK, Inc., managing partner

                                   By: /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
                                       ----------------------
                                       SPENCER WERTHEIMER
                                       President (principal
                                       executive  officer,
                                       principal financial
                                       officer)


<PAGE>