alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.33-20 Operation and installation. ( a ) The system must be so arranged and installed that the presence of smoke in any of the protected spaces will automatically be indicated visually to an observer directly in front of the detection cabinet. The visible notice must automatically indicate the zone in which the smoke originated. The detection cabinet must normally be located in the pilothouse or fire control station. On vessels greater than 5,000 gross tons, there must also be an automatic audible alarm in the wheelhouse together with an auxiliary audible alarm in the engine room.
( b ) If the detection cabinet is not located in the pilothouse or fire control station, it must be located in convenient proximity to the valve control station of the extinguishing system. In this case, there must be in the pilothouse or fire control station automatic visual alarms, one for each zone in which an alarm may originate, as well as an automatic audible alarm. There must also be an auxiliary audible alarm in the engine room. For installations contracted for on or after January 1, 1962, where detection cabinets are not located in the pilothouse or an adjacent fire control station having direct access to the pilothouse, an efficient means of direct communication must be provided between the pilothouse and the stations where the detection cabinets are located.
( c ) No exhaust from the detection cabinet may be discharged in the vicinity of the cabinet to permit the detection of fire by odor. Instead, the exhaust must be directed to the outside. Vessels must comply with this requirement not later than July 22, 2021.
( d ) The smoke detection system must be used for no other purpose except that it may be incorporated with the fire extinguishing system to the spaces covered by the smoke detection system.
( e ) The accumulators, detection cabinet, interconnecting valves with the fire extinguishing system, alarms, and indicating devices must be of an approved type.
( f ) All wiring and electrical circuits and equipment must meet the applicable requirements of subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.
( g ) A framed chart or diagram must be installed adjacent to the detection cabinet and auxiliary panel indicating the location of the various zones and giving instructions for the operation, maintenance, and testing of the system. The chart at the cabinet location or a separate card or booklet to be kept near the chart, must have tabulated spaces for the date and signature of the licensed officer of the vessel who must witness or conduct the periodic tests.
( h ) The audible smoke detection alarms must be identified as required by § 78.47-13 of this subchapter.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16940, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48259, July 22, 2016]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: September 14, 2018 

 

Mr. David J. Weaver 

U.S. District Court 

for the Eastern District of Michigan 

231 W. Lafayette Boulevard 

Fifth Floor Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse 

Detroit, MI 48226-0000 

 Re: Case No. 17-1998, Monica Rogers v. Henry Ford Health System

Originating Case No. : 2:15-cv-12312 

Dear Clerk, 

 Enclosed is a copy of the mandate filed in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Cheryl Borkowski 

Case Manager 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7035 

cc: Ms. Barbara Eckert Buchanan 

 Mr. Terrence J. Miglio 

 Ms. Anne Noel Occhialino 

 Mr. Gerald D. Wahl 

Enclosure 

 

Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 75, PageID.2314 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 2 Case: 17-1998 Document: 38 Filed: 09/14/2018 Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

 

________________ 

 No: 17-1998 

________________

 

 Filed: September 14, 2018 

MONICA J. ROGERS 

 Plaintiff - Appellant 

v. 

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM 

 Defendant - Appellee 

 

MANDATE 

 Pursuant to the court's disposition that was filed 07/31/2018 the mandate for this case hereby 

issues today. 

 

COSTS: None 

Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 75, PageID.2315 Filed 09/14/18 Page 2 of 2 Case: 17-1998 Document: 38 Filed: 09/14/2018 Page: 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            5812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5812
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              957
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           180
<OTHER-SE>                                        4675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
§ 34.20-20 Discharge outlets—T/ALL. ( a ) Discharge outlets shall be of an approved type.
( b ) At least one mounted foam appliance shall be provided for each station that is required in § 34.20-15(c).
( c ) The number of hand-held appliances provided shall be at least equal to the number of hose outlets at the two foam stations having the most hose outlets. Hand-held appliances shall be stowed in a well marked, readily accessible position that cannot be isolated by a fire involving the cargo tanks.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16694, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 72-138, 39 FR 7790, Feb. 28, 1974]
EPA-420-B-11-001

 January 2011

Diesel Fuel Dates for the State of Alaska

Urban AK (areas served by the FAHS)

HW- 

• pre-2006: HS/uncontrolled

• 2006: 6/1/06- refiners to 15; 9/1/06- pipelines & terminals to 15; 10/15/06- retail & WPC to 

15

NRLM- 

• pre-2007: HS/uncontrolled

• 2007: 6/1/07- refiners to 500; 8/1/07- pipelines & terminals to 500; 10/1/07- retail & WPC to 

500; 12/1/07- in-use, farm & construction tanks to 500 (note- urban AK is on same 

downstream schedule as NE/MA) 

• 2010: 6/1/10- refiners to 15 NR; 8/1/10- pipelines & terminals to 15 NR; 10/1/10- retail & 

WPC to 15 NR; 12/1/10- in-use, farm & construction tanks to 15 NR

• 2012: 6/1/12- refiners to 15 LM; 8/1/12- pipelines & terminals to 15 LM; 10/1/12- retail & 

WPC to 15 LM; 12/1/12- in-use, farm & construction tanks to 15 LM

** Urban AK is on the same schedule as the main HW & NR diesel programs (except they're on the 

same downstream schedule as the NE/MA for NRLM in 2007); permanently exempt from dye & 

marker requirements **

Rural AK

HW- 

• pre-2010: HS/uncontrolled

• 2010: 6/1/10- refiners to 15 HW; 8/1/10- pipelines & terminals to 15 HW; 10/1/10- retail & 

WPC to 15 HW; 12/1/10- in-use, farm & construction tanks to 15 HW

NRLM- 

• pre-2010: HS/uncontrolled

• 2010: 6/1/10- refiners to 15 NRLM; 8/1/10- pipelines & terminals to 15 NRLM; 10/1/10- retail 

& WPC to 15 NRLM; 12/1/10- in-use, farm & construction tanks to 15 NRLM

** Downstream transition dates are same for HW & NRLM in rural AK; permanent exemption from dye 

& marker requirements **

General Note- credit & transmix fuel cannot be used in any area of AK; small refiner fuel can be used 

with approval (and only if properly labeled and segregated)
Order entered August 29, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00073-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF IRA E. TOBOLOWSKY, DECEASED

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17620

ORDER

Before the Court is the Estate of Ira E. Tobolowsky’s August 26, 2019 motion for 

extension of time to file its opening brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER the 

brief be filed no later than September 27, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 91.01-15 Temporary certificate.

(a) If necessary to prevent delay of the vessel, a temporary certificate of inspection, Form CG-854, shall be issued pending the issuance and delivery of the regular certificate of inspection. Such temporary certificate shall be carried in the same manner as the regular certificate and shall in all ways be considered the same as the regular certificate of inspection which it represents.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 155 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 155

To increase opportunities for veterans held as prisoners-of-war during 
  the Vietnam era to participate in Department of Defense procurement 
                                actions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase opportunities for veterans held as prisoners-of-war during 
  the Vietnam era to participate in Department of Defense procurement 
                                actions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``Procurement Opportunities for 
Vietnam POWs Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED PARTICIPATION BY VETERANS IN DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) Former Vietnam-Era POWs To Be Eligible for SDB Program.--For 
purposes of section 2323(a)(1)(A) of title 10, United States Code, an 
individual who was held as a prisoner of war during the Vietnam era 
shall be deemed to be a socially and economically disadvantaged 
individual.
    (b) Implementation.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the 
regulations prescribed under section 2323 of title 10, United States 
Code (and such other regulations as may be necessary) in order to take 
into account the provisions of subsection (a) with respect to fiscal 
years 1996 and 1997.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 502.207 Stipulations.

The parties may, and are encouraged to, stipulate any facts involved in the proceeding and include them in the record with the consent of the presiding officer. A stipulation may be admitted even if all parties do not agree, provided that any party who does not agree to the stipulation has the right to cross-examine and offer rebuttal evidence. [Rule 207.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on National Guard and Reserves in the GWOT will meet in closed session on February 5-6, 2007; at the Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess the consequences for force structure, morale, and mission capability of deployments of members of the National Guard and the Reserves in the course of the global war on terrorism that are lengthy, frequent, or both.In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public.

      ( print page 3116)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e mail at                         *clifton.phillips@osd.mil,*                         or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

Dated: January 18, 2007.

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-274 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### In the Matter of Henry Livingston.

Motion to amend notice of appeal denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Edward Hannon and Michael Cavanagh, *as Taxpayers, etc., Respondents, v.*John Magill, *as Police Commissioner, etc.,.*Appellant.

Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party, on the ground that the question has become merely abstract.
David Moody, Manager 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-3090 

Dear Dr. Moody: 

 During the week of June 19, 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

performed inspections of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) waste management and storage 

operations (EPA-WIPP-6.06-20a), waste emplacement (EPA-WIPP-6.06-20c) and the 

monitoring program (EPA-WIPP-6.06-20b). These inspections were performed under the 

authority of 40 CFR 194.21 and 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart A. 

As a result of the inspection, EPA determined that the activities related to emissions 

monitoring during waste management and storage continue to comply with the requirements of 

40 CFR Part 191, Subpart A. EPA also determined that DOE continues to adequately monitor 

the ten parameters that are important to the long-term containment of waste, as identified in 

EPA’s 1998 Certification Decision and 2006 Recertification Decision. EPA’s inspection also 

determined that waste is being appropriately emplaced in the repository and that the amount of 

magnesium oxide (MgO) is adequately calculated and tracked. In the emplacement inspection 

report and in the 2006 Recertification Decision, EPA noted that DOE needs to better understand 

the uncertainty range for the amount of cellulose, plastic and rubber material in repository. EPA 

will continue to work with DOE on this issue. 

 

 Copies of the enclosed inspection reports will be placed in the EPA public dockets. If 

you have any questions regarding the enclosed reports, please call Chuck Byrum at (214) 665-

7555. 

 Sincerely, 

 Juan Reyes, Director 

 Radiation Protection Division 

Enclosure 

 

cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

 Russ Patterson, DOE/CBFO Daryl Mercer, DOE/CBFO 

 Steve Casey, DOE/CBFO Steve Zappe, NMED 

 EPA Docket 

bcc: WIPP Team (w/o enclosures) 

ORIA:RPD:TPEAKE:mt:09/08/06:6608J:X343-9765
#### § 7.90 St. Johns River, FL.

A line drawn from the southeasternmost extremity of Little Talbot (Spike) Island to latitude 30°23.8′ N. longitude 81°20.3′ W. (St. Johns Lighted Whistle Buoy “2 STJ”); thence to St. Johns Light.
§ 76.10-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 76.10-90, shall apply to all fire main installations contracted for on or after May 26, 1965. Installations contracted for prior to May 26, 1965, shall meet the requirements of § 76.10-90.
( b ) [Reserved]
## Cangre.55 of Oe vArliteb *tato ^?au5e of ^.^pre5clitatibeg U t 

### 1a g 

### laiit g 

### toii, DC 20515--4320 JC]AMIN C11S1'FiC) 20ui f)r. ii9it i,Ttvns COMMIf7C1 ON n(iMl:D [SI RVIC't^:S (:OMMMCC: ON POtil=1C;N nPf=RIRS, wnsruWa fora Otf ICt . l l J Ctni,.iN fitiw ' r C)r bi;E 13wi W,^:,iiurrx,rora, t7C 70G1^i Ittr1202i225 3:?^6 Fnx:17U2i2J5 1916 01SMI(a GtPLLa. 4715 Piir-.nla0+tKYeUu7¢ RGn[i, Suirr 512 Snti AN'ror,if>, tX 78;3251 Tl^.t: (210V 948-6216 F'nx:121Q1g'79--0i31



### October 31'', 2013

'The I-Ionorable Gina McCarthy I;nvironmental }'rotection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave Rm 300 WJC South I t 0I A Washington, DC 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy: Recently, a number ofmy colleagues in the Ilouse of Representatives wrote to you regarding the need for adjustments to the Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS). I would like to add my voice to this issue and request that t11e I?nvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) consider using its existing authority to adjust the 2014 RFS volumes in oi • der to protect consumcrs. As you know, the RFS was initially enacted in the Energy 1'olicy Aet of 2005, and later expanded undcr tile I:nergy and Independence Security Act of 2007. 'I'he RFS rcquires transportation ftiel sold in the United States to eontain annually increasing volumes of renewable fucl, eurrently set at 18.15 billion gallons in 2014. While the objectives of the RFS -- development ol' alternative fuels to achieve energy independenee while reducing carbon dioxide emissions — were well-intentioned, many objective observers now recognize that sevcral key prernises underlying thc RPS are no longer valid. For example, domestic demand for transportation fuels has not met expected projections, and the requisite brcakthroughs in alternative fuels production have not reached commercial scale. 'I'liese two factors, combined with increasing ethanol marldates, are quickly leading us to what experts have referred to its the }:10 "blendwall" — the point at which our transportation fuel supply is saturated with the maximum amount of' ethanol that current vehicles, engines and infi•astrticture can safely accoinmodate. In addition to the safety and finaneial concerns, this could mean inereases in gasoline prices for consumers. Aside from the pressing concerns associated with the E10 blendwall issue, many in the environmental and farming communities continuc to express eoncerns about volatile corn pi•iees,rising lii-ecyele emissions, and wetland/grassland eonversion issues due to the dramatic

expansion of corn ethanol. Taking all of these concerns into account, I would respectfully request that your agency use the existing statutory authorities to adjust the 2014 RFS volumes to avoid potentially negative iinpacts on our environment and economy, and maintain our progress toward the development ol' commcrcially available renewable energy sources. I'hank you for your consideration of this request, and for your continued leadership on thcse

lssues.

5ted erely, 

# (^ uin Castro States Congressman (TX-20)
§ 34.25-10 Controls—T/ALL. ( a ) There shall be one control valve for the operation of the system located in an accessible position outside the space protected. The control shall be located as convenient as practicable to one of the main escapes from the space protected, and shall be marked as required by § 35.40-18 of this subchapter. It shall not be necessary to start the pumps from the control space.
( b ) Complete, but simple instructions for the operation of the system shall be located in a conspicuous place at or near the controls.
( c ) The valve to the space protected shall be marked as required by § 35.40-18 of this subchapter.
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

**AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR TO THE AVIALL, INC.**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED 1998 DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN**

 

This Amendment Number Four to the Aviall, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Directors Stock Plan (this “Amendment”), dated as of June 14, 2005 is made and entered into by Aviall, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Aviall, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Directors Stock Plan (the“Plan”). 

 

**RECITALS**

 

WHEREAS, Section XI of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the“Board”) may amend the Plan and the Board desired to obtain stockholder approval of the proposal to amend the Plan; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Board submitted a proposal to amend the Plan to the Company’s stockholders at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company’s stockholders approved the proposal to amend the Plan; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section XI of the Plan, the Companyhereby amends the Plan as follows: 

 

1. Paragraph C of Section IV of the Plan ishereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2006, by deleting the first sentence of said paragraph in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 

 

C. Stock Grants—Each participating Director who has made an election to participate in the Plan pursuant to Paragraph Bof this Section IV shall be eligible to receive annually, on January 26th of each calendar year, or if such date in any year is not a New York Stock Exchange trading day, the next New York Stock Exchange trading day (the “Grant Date”),following such election, in lieu of such Director’s annual retainer for service as a director of the Company (the “Annual Retainer”) a grant of Common Stock. 

 

2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment and Amendment Nos. One, Two and Three to the Aviall, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998Directors Stock Plan, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the provisions thereof. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.