1

Filed 11/20/13 P. v. Rice CA4/2 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION TWO 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

v. 

WILLIE TYRONE RICE, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 E058847 

 (Super.Ct.No. FWV16750) 

 OPINION 

 APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Michael A. Smith, 

Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice 

pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. 

Cindi B. Mishkin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant. 

 No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 
2

 Defendant and appellant Willie Tyrone Rice appeals from an order denying his 

petition for recall of his indeterminate life term under Penal Code section 1170.126, 

subdivision (f).1 We will affirm the order. 

I 

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 

On April 5, 1999, a jury found defendant guilty of inflicting corporal injury on a 

spouse. (§ 273.5, subd. (a).) In a bifurcated bench trial, the trial court found true the 

special allegation that defendant had suffered two prior serious and violent felony 

convictions (§§ 667, subd. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subd. (a)-(d)) for attempted murder 

(§§ 664/187) and robbery (§ 211). On May 13, 1999, after denying defendant’s motion 

to dismiss his prior strike convictions, the trial court sentenced defendant to a total term 

of 25 years to life in state prison under the three strikes law. 

On November 6, 2012, the electorate passed Proposition 36, also known as the 

“Three Strikes Reform Act.” Among other things, this ballot measure enacted section 

1170.126, which permits persons currently serving an indeterminate life term under the 

three strikes law to file a petition in the sentencing court to be resentenced to a 

determinate term as a second striker. (§ 1170.126, subd. (f).) If the trial court 

determines, in its discretion, that the defendant meets the criteria of section 1170.126, 

subdivision (e), the court may resentence the defendant. (§ 1170.126, subds. (f), (g).) 

 1 All future statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. 
3

On March 4, 2013, defendant filed in pro. per. a petition for resentencing under 

section 1170.126. The trial court denied the petition on May 2, 2013, due to defendant’s 

strike conviction for attempted murder, which made him ineligible for resentencing under 

section 1170.126, subdivision (e)(3). Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. 

III 

DISCUSSION 

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. After examination of the 

record, counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 

436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a 

summary of the facts, and one potential arguable issue: whether the trial court abused its 

discretion when it denied defendant’s petition for resentencing. 

Section 1170.126, applies exclusively to those “persons presently serving an 

indeterminate term of imprisonment pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of 

Section 667 or paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 1170.12, whose sentence under 

this act would not have been an indeterminate life sentence.” (§ 1170.126, subd. (a).) 

Section 1170.126 sets forth a procedure through which certain prisoners can petition the 

court for resentencing. Such a person may file a petition to recall his or her sentence and 

be sentenced as a second strike offender. (§ 1170.126, subd. (b).) An inmate is eligible 

for such resentencing if none of his or her commitment offenses constitute serious or 

violent felonies and none of enumerated factors disqualifying a defendant for 

resentencing under Proposition 36 apply. (§ 1170.126, subd. (e).) 
4

Section 1170.126, subdivision (e)(3), provides that an inmate is eligible for 

resentencing if “[t]he inmate has no prior convictions for any of the offenses appearing in 

clause (iv) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 667 or 

clause (iv) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 1170.12.” 

Defendant here has a prior conviction for attempted murder, an offense listed in sections 

667, subdivision (e)(C)(iv)(IV), and 1170.12, subdivision (c)(C)(iv)(IV). Defendant was 

therefore ineligible for resentencing under section 1170.126. 

 We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he 

has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we 

have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues. 

II 

DISPOSITION 

 The order is affirmed. 

 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

RAMIREZ 

 P. J. 

We concur: 

RICHLI 

 J. 

CODRINGTON 

 J.