alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 98

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 98.30-3 Definitions.

*IBC* means an intermediate bulk container as defined in 49 CFR 171.8.

*IM 101 portable tank and IM 102 portable tank* means a portable tank constructed and approved by PMSA and manufactured on or before January 1, 2003, that meets the requirements for continued use under 49 CFR 173.32.

*IMO Type 1 portable tank* means a portable tank constructed in accordance with International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code (2012 Edition), that meets the definition of an IMO Type 1 portable tank under Section 4.2.0.1 of the IMDG Code (incorporated by reference, see § 98.30-2), and that meets the provisions for continued use under the IMDG Code.

*IMO Type 2 portable tank* means a portable tank constructed in accordance with the IMDG Code, that meets the definition of an IMO Type 2 portable tank under Section 4.2.0.1 of the IMDG Code (incorporated by reference, see § 98.30-2), and that meets the provisions for continued use under the IMDG Code.

*MPT* means a marine portable tank that was inspected and stamped by the Coast Guard on or before September 30, 1992, and that meets the applicable requirements in this part and part 64 of this chapter.

*UN portable tank* means a portable tank constructed in accordance with 49 CFR 178.274 and 178.275, and approved in accordance with 49 CFR 173.32 and 178.273.

[USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54785, Sept. 6, 2013]
See the purl for GPO32347 for older copies of this serial.
#### § 1103.35 Partnership or professional corporation names and titles.

In the formation of a partnership or professional corporation among practitioners care should be taken to avoid any misleading name or representation which would create a false impression as to the position or privileges of a member not duly authorized to practice. No person should be held as a practitioner who is not duly qualified under § 1103.2 or § 1103.3 of these rules. No person who is not duly admitted to practice should be held out in a way which will give the impression that he is so admitted. No false or assumed or trade name should be used to disguise the practitioner or his partnership or professional corporation.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Social security, working while disabled,a guide to plans for achieving self-support.
 
1997 | 1999 | 2004 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:SSA 1.8:W 89/2/
Item Number:0517-C
CGP System Number:000593717
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 23, 2017********
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending May 9, 2009

----

Bank Holding CompaniesAllied Irish Banks, p.l.c., Dublin, Ireland; M&T Bank Corporation, Buffalo, New York; and First Empire State Holding Company  -- to acquire Provident Bankshares Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland, and thereby acquire Provident Bank of Maryland; and for Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, to merge with Provident Bank of Maryland and thereby establish branches.					-Approved, May 8, 2009 					

EnforcementBay National Corporation, Lutherville, Maryland  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.					-Announced, May 6, 2009 					Cache Valley Banking Company, Logan, Utah, and Cache Valley Bank  -- cease and desist order dated March 20, 2007, terminated April 28, 2009.					-Announced, May 6, 2009 					Hometown Bancshares, Inc., Carthage, Missouri  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.					-Announced, May 4, 2009 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend without revision the Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Real Estate Appraisal Standards for Federally Related Transactions Pursuant to Regulations H and Y (FR H-4); Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Changes in Foreign Investments (Made Pursuant to Regulation K) (FR 2064); Request for Proposal (RFP) and Request for Price Quotations (RFPQ); and Notice Requirements in Connection with Regulation W (Reg W).					-Approved, May 5, 2009 					Forms  -- initial Board review to extend without revision the reporting and disclosure requirements of Regulation P (Privacy of Consumer Financial Information).					-Proposed, May 7, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $150 billion in 28-day credit on May 4, 2009.					-Announced, May 4, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulation Z (Truth in Lending)  -- final�amendments to revise disclosure requirements for mortgage loans, consistent with recent statutory changes made by the Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act.					-Approved, May 7, 2009 					

Testimony And StatementsEconomic Outlook  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress on recent economic developments and current conditions in financial markets.					-Published, May 5, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: May 14, 2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending May 2, 2009

|Filer                            | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST LEROY BANCORPORATION, INC. | CIC           | Notice by Donna L. Hanson, LeRoy, Minnesota, to acquire and retain 25 percent or more of the shares of First LeRoy Bancorporation, Inc., LeRoy, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of First State Bank Minnesota, LeRoy, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/20/2009
|Newspaper:                       | Not available
|Federal Register:                | 05/20/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.27 H.R. 517--Unfinished Business]
[Page 380]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.27  h.r. 517--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 517) to amend title V of Public Law 
96-550, designating the Chaco Culture Archeological Protection Sites, 
and for other purposes.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

409

affirmative

Nays

7
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 11.01

                    CAPITAL RE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
          EXHIBIT 11 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                (Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)
                                          
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                        -----------------------------------
                                          1997          1996          1995
                                        ----------------------------------- 
<S>                                     <C>           <C>           <C> 
Net Income                              $70,052       $56,524       $45,527
 
Basic weighted average
      common shares outstanding          15,873        15,656        14,788
 
Potentially dilutive employee
      stock options                         380           290           126
                                        ----------------------------------- 
Diluted weighted average
     common shares outstanding           16,253        15,946        14,914
                                        =================================== 
 
Basic earnings per share                $  4.41       $  3.61       $  3.08
                                        =================================== 
 
Diluted earnings per share              $  4.31       $  3.54       $  3.05
                                        =================================== 
</TABLE>
#### Simon J. Keator, *Respondent, v.*Flavius Smith and William H. Smith, *Appellants*.

Judgment modified by deducting $158.18, as of date of judgment, and as modified affirmed without costs in this court. Opinion by

Landon, J.
§ 64.81 30-month inspection of an MPT. ( a ) The 30-month inspection of an MPT required in § 64.77(b) must include— ( 1 ) An internal and external examination for— ( i ) Corrosion;
( ii ) Cracking of base material; and
( iii ) Weld defects; and
( 2 ) A visual inspection for defective parts and a manual operation of the gauging device, remote operating mechanism, and each valve, except the pressure relief device.
( b ) If the tank passes the inspection required in paragraph (a) of this section, the owner or his representative may stencil the date of the inspection on the MPT near the metal identification plate that is required in § 64.53 in durable and legible letters that are 11 ⁄ 4 inch in height or larger.
98-2369.

#### State v. Walker.

Hamilton App. No. C-970647. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.4 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 699]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.4  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FUNDERBURK, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Friday, May 12, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
§ 1.3 Exercise of authority. ( a ) In exercising powers and performing duties delegated by this part or redelegated pursuant thereto, officials of the Department of Transportation are governed by applicable laws, Executive Orders and regulations and by policies, objectives, plans, standards, procedures, and limitations as may be issued from time to time by or on behalf of the Secretary, or, with respect to matters under their jurisdictions, by or on behalf of the Deputy Secretary, the Under Secretary, the General Counsel, an Assistant Secretary, the Inspector General, or an Administrator. This includes, wherever specified, the requirement for advance notice to, prior coordination with, or prior approval by an authority other than that of the official proposing to act.
( b ) Subject to the reservations of authority to the Secretary of Transportation in § 1.21, the Deputy Secretary, the Under Secretary, the General Counsel, the Assistant Secretaries, the Inspector General, and the Administrators exercise the powers and perform the duties delegated to them under this part.
( c ) For delegations of authority vested in the Secretary by Executive Order 13526 (see also Executive Orders 12958 and 12065) originally to classify documents as secret and confidential, see § 8.11 of this subtitle. Previous delegations of authority to Department of Transportation officials to originally classify information as secret and confidential are hereby rescinded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the consolidated balance sheet and income statement of Computer Network 
Technology Corporation as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     11,465,451
<SECURITIES>                               24,267,412 
<RECEIVABLES>                              20,190,081 
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,044,306 
<INVENTORY>                                10,796,611 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           68,663,698       
<PP&E>                                     23,391,570      
<DEPRECIATION>                             15,272,309    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             84,657,022      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      18,765,287    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                      233,610 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                 64,273,125       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               84,657,022         
<SALES>                                    55,354,674          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           71,879,286          
<CGS>                                      19,147,669          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              31,845,268          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           10,002,482<F1>       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             24,668       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,506,342       
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,230,000      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,276,342      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                2,276,342 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .10 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .10 
<FN>

<F1> Amount presented represents engineering and development expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7377

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FLOYD RAYMOND LOOKER, a/k/a Ray,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00043-FPS-1; 1:99-cv00181-FPS)

Submitted: March 14, 2011 Decided: April 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Raymond Looker, Appellant Pro Se. David Earl Godwin, 

Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Raymond Looker, Jr. seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motion to amend his previously denied 

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Looker has not made the requisite showing. A 

district court may only grant a post-judgment motion to amend if 

the court has vacated the underlying judgment pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 59(e) or 60(b). Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 427-

48 (4th Cir. 2006) (en banc). Here, the district court did not 
3

vacate the underlying judgment, a judgment that this court 

declined to overrule on appeal. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                          MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1996                1995           1994

                                                             (in thousands except share and per share amounts)

<S>                                                         <C>                  <C>            <C> 
Income Available to Common Shareholders                            $37,032            $30,164        $24,973
                                                            ===============      =============  =============

Weighted Average Common Shares
     Common shares outstanding                                  18,183,435         17,719,718     17,369,590
                                                            ---------------      -------------  -------------

     Common share equivalents associated with options,
       warrants and Redeemable Common Shares :
        Options                                                  2,051,157          1,821,247      1,598,963
        Redeemable Common Shares                                   468,584            468,584        468,584
                                                            ---------------      -------------  -------------
                                                                 2,519,741          2,289,831      2,067,547

     Common Shares purchased with proceeds from
      options and warrants exercised                            (1,553,543)        (1,435,991)    (1,414,837)
                                                            ---------------      -------------  -------------
                                                                   966,198            853,840        652,709
                                                            ---------------      -------------  -------------


     Total Weighted Average Common Shares                       19,149,633         18,573,558     18,022,300
                                                            ===============      =============  =============

Earnings Per Common Share
   Net income available to common shareholders                       $1.93              $1.62          $1.39
                                                            ===============      =============  =============

</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

1, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: June 23, 2015 , Remarks on Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

during Panel of Maine Public Health Professionals
**SUMMARY** On June 23, 2015, a panel of Maine public health professionals responded to the Surgeon General’s statement on climate change. C ynthia Greene provided remarks that included the proposed Clean Power Pl an for Existing Power Plants

. **SPEAKERS** Dr. Douglas Couper, Martin's Point Health Care, American Lung Association Rachel Kaprielian, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dr. Ton y Owens, emergency room ph ys ician Cy nthia Greene, U.S. Environmental P rotection Agency Tina Pettingill, Executive Director of the Maine Public Health Association Dr. Lani Graham, family

phy sician and former state medical director **ATTENDEES:** Approximately

20 people attended this event including a representative from Senator King ’s office. Attendance was not taken by EPA Attachments.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00441

- CV

IN RE Jaime LUEVANO

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 24, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 There is no underlying proceeding in this case. However, relator seeks relief against the 81st Judicial District

Court, Wilson County, Texas, the Honorable Donna Rayes presiding, and the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson

County, the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding.