alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 15-20420 

 v. 

 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

ZACHARY PUTKOVICH, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On September 17, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a 

plea hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on that 

same day, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 15) is ADOPTED. 

1:15-cr-20420-TLL-PTM Doc # 18 Filed 10/06/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 93
 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 14) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: October 6, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on October 6, 2015. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20420-TLL-PTM Doc # 18 Filed 10/06/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 94
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of earnings and consolidated
statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-K for the period
ending April 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.7319
<CASH>                                         197,007
<SECURITIES>                                   136,897
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,572
<INVENTORY>                                    159,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               944,928
<PP&E>                                         622,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                 328,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,496,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       351,388
<OTHER-SE>                                     775,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,496,703
<SALES>                                      1,376,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          507,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,105,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                279,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,718
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            156,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   156,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.90
        




</TABLE>
§ 541.8 Requests for fee mitigation, refund, or waiver. ( a ) The billing party must allow the billed party at least thirty (30) calendar days from the invoice issuance date to request mitigation, refund, or waiver of fees from the billing party.
( b ) If a billing party receives a fee mitigation, refund, or waiver request from a billed party, the billing party must attempt to resolve the request within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving such a request or at a later date as agreed upon by both parties.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 30, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
To: 'Susan Kurland Page 3 of 4 2012-05-09 16:55:48 EDT 

K&.L!GATES 

IL y I 0 /.\ Cj: D 2 

May 9, 2012 

Honorable Susan L Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International 

Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations (M-JO,Room Wl2-l40) 

West Building Ground Floor 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

K&L Gates LLP From: Clune, Rosemarie 

K&L Gi!I.BS UY 

11i01 K 5tr·eet NW 

Washington, DC 21JOGi': 1600 

r 202.71'8.9000 www.klg;-;tcs.Gorn 

Jonathan Blank 

D 202.661.6250 

F 202.77R.9100 

jonathan.hlunk@klgat~s.com 

RE: Letter of May 7, 2012 from Counsel for VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc 

Dear Secretary Kurland: 

On May 7, 2012 Counsel for VTH Cougar Helicopters, Inc wrote you concerning the sale of 

certain assets of VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc. In that letter he requested that the Department 

stay further proceedings in Docket DOT -OST020 12-0022 pursuantto VJH Cougar's Motion 

of April 2, 2012 to Stay Proceedings in that docket. 

PHI Helicopters filed its Answer to the Motion to Stay, opposing the Stay, on Aprill2, 2012. 

After an investigation covering four years, and over 7 months after: the Department notified 

VIH Cougar of its intention to take action against their non-citizen operations if not divested 

within 30 days, VIH Cougar continues to play for time while operating unlawfully. 

We believe that the Department should. continue with the proceedings to their logical 

conclusion, the withdrawal ofVIH Cougar's certification. However, ifthe Department does 

consider new ownership s1ructures for VIH Cougar that result in new owners for the existing 

Certificates, the transfer of ownership should be subject to full transparency and public 

vetting of the ownership structure. There is no reason to give VIHAG and VIH Cougar any 

ability to continue to hide the ownership ofthose certificates from full public scrutiny. Any 

proposed sale that inclndes certificate authority should be made pmt of the existing Docket 

and the public given the opportunity to examine the structure. 

DC-96220 1 R v l 
To: 'Susan Kurland Page 4 of 4 

K&LIGATES 

Honorable Susan L. Kurland 

May 9, 2012 

Page 2 

cc: 

David M. Nadler 

David Y. Yang 

Andrew E. Smith 

DICK..';TEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1825 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Telephone: (202) 420-2200 

Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 

nadlerd@dicksteinshapiro. com 

yangd@dicksteinshapiro. com 

smitha@dicksteinshapiro. com 

2012-05-09 16:55:48 EDT 

Counsel to VIR Cougar Helicopters, Inc. 

K&L Gates LLP From: Clune, Rosemarie
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending July 31, 2010

|Filer                                    | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC. | CIC         | Jeffrey T. Valcourt, JNV Limited Partnership, II, and JNV Limited Partnership, III, all of Arlington, Vrginia, acting in concert to control 33.77% of the voting shares of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., Vienna, Virginia. | Newspaper:08/08/2010Federal Register:08/11/2010
|Newspaper:                               | 08/08/2010 
|Federal Register:                        | 08/11/2010 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
(Am e n d e d Ma y 3 , 2 0 0 2 )(Am e n d e d Ma y 3 , 2 0 0 2 )
##### 



Exhibit
4.50
 CONFIDENTIAL
 
 Attn:
    
    Mr. John Farina;
Ms. Connie Sit;
Mr. Gawain Chan;
  Ref: BANKING FACILITY
  Borrower
    
    :
    
    Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited(CHINESE CHARACTERS)Lender:
    
    :
    
    HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited, Shenzhen Branch.Security
    
    :
    
    Previous:
Corporate Guarantee for USD10,000,000.- from Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.,
supported by board resolution.New:
Corporate Guarantee for USD10,000,000.- from Nam Tai Electronic &
Electrical Products Limited to be supported by board resolution.
    1




---



##### 



For and on behalf of
    
    Accepted byHSBC Bank (China) Company Limited
    
    Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen)Shenzhen Branch
    
    Company Limited(CHINESE CHARACTERS)
 [Chop in Chinese]/s/ Fay Zhou
    
    /s/ [signature illegible]Faye Zhou
    
    Authorised Signature(s) & ChopVice President
    
    Date:Commercial Banking
 Barry YiuBarry YiuSenior Vice PresidentCommercial Banking
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         105,771
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    187,512
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,396
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            29,331
<LOANS>                                        851,354
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,739,687<F1>
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,064,623
<SHORT-TERM>                                    87,953
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            224,340
<LONG-TERM>                                    211,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,562
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,727,643<F1>
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,554
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,495
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 8,629
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,678
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,956
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           18,722
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,525
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  57
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,633<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,551
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,551
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,187
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.48
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,961
<LOANS-PAST>                                       233
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 8,271
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,336
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,333
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,338
<RECOVERIES>                                       198
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,718
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              1,200
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            518
<FN>
<F1>Difference is minority interest in consolidated subsidiary of $12,044.
<F2>Does not include $434 of minority interest in net income of consolidated
subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 58.60-11 Analyses, plans, diagrams and specifications: Submission. ( a ) Each industrial system must be analyzed by a registered professional engineer to certify that the system has been designed in accordance with applicable standards.
( b ) The certification must— ( 1 ) Appear on all diagrams and analyses; and
( 2 ) Be submitted under § 50.20-5 of this chapter.
( c ) Standards or specifications for non-pressurized, mechanical or structural systems, and components such as derricks, drawworks, and rotary tables which comply with standards or specifications not referenced in this subchapter must be referenced on the plans or in the specifications of the unit.
§ 67.211 Requirement for citizenship declaration. ( a ) Instruments in the nature of a bill of sale or deed of gift, mortgages, and assignments of mortgages conveying an interest in a documented vessel are ineligible for filing and recording unless accompanied by a declaration of citizenship, except as provided in paragraph (c) and (d) of this section.
( b ) Citizenship declarations must be executed on the form prescribed by the Maritime Administration in 46 CFR part 221. These forms are available from the National Vessel Documentation Center and from the Vessel Transfer and Disposal Officer (MAR-745.1), Maritime Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) The requirement for presentation of a citizenship declaration does not apply to a transaction conveying an interest in a vessel: ( 1 ) Described in 46 CFR 221.11(b)(1) (i) through (iv);
( 2 ) To a person making application for documentation; or
( 3 ) To an entity of the Federal Government of the United States or of a State or political subdivision thereof, or a corporate entity which is an agency of any such government or political subdivision.
( d ) The requirement for presentation of a citizenship declaration is waived when the instrument(s) presented for filing effects a transfer for which: ( 1 ) The Maritime Administration has given general approval in 46 CFR part 221; or
( 2 ) Written approval of the Maritime Administrator has been obtained in accordance with 46 CFR part 221.
( e ) If the transfer of interest is one which requires written approval of the Maritime Administrator in accordance with rules in 46 CFR part 221, evidence of that approval must be presented for filing with the instrument effecting the transfer of interest.
Note:
If the grantee(s) of an ownership interest in a vessel described in paragraphs (c)(1) or (d) of this section do(es) not make application for documentation, a declaration of citizenship may be required in order to ensure that the vessel so conveyed retains any coastwise privileges to which it may be entitled.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31605, June 15, 1995; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49230, Sept. 25, 2009]
#### § 1016.109 Awards against other agencies.

If an applicant is entitled to an award because it prevails over another agency of the United States that participates in a proceeding before this agency and takes a position that is not substantially justified, the award or an appropriate portion of the award shall be made against that agency.
#### § 1018.53 Finality of a compromise.

An offer of compromise must be in writing and signed by the debtor. An offer of compromise which is accepted by the Board is final and conclusive on the debtor and on all officials, agencies and courts of the United States, unless obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, the presentation of a false claim, or mutual mistake of fact.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.23 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 420]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.23  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private bills and resolutions were 
introduced and severally referred as follows:

           By Mr. BONIOR:
       H.R. 1286. A bill to authorize the Secretary of 
     Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with 
     appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade 
     for the vessel Gilbraltar; to the Committee on Transportation 
     and Infrastructure.
           By Mr. MINETA:
       H.R. 1287. A bill for the relief of Nguyen Quy An and 
     Nguyen Ngoc Kim Quy; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MARK HOWARD

, §

§ No. 649, 2014

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, §

§ Court Below

– Superior Court

v. § of the State of Delaware

, in

§ and for New Castle County

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§ Cr. ID No. 0611014197

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 14 , 2015

Decided: October 21 , 2015

Before V ALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

On t his 21 st day of October 2015, the Court after careful consideration of the

parties’ briefs and oral argument on appeal, find s it evident that the final judgment

of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons

assigned by the Superior Court in its well

- reasoned October 27, 2014

Memorandum Opinion and Order

.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 15, 2011

---





## Advisory Councils

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: In the Interest R. M. B and G. R. B., children v. Department of Family and Protective Services Appellate case number: 01 - 14 - 00495 - CV 01 - 14 - 00499 - CV Trial court c ase number: 2013 - 02934J Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County These are related appeals filed by each of the parents of the minor children. We previously granted an extension for the appellant in 01 - 14 - 00499 - CV until September 8, 2014 to fi le appellant’s brief. We are now in receipt of a request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief in 01 - 14 - 00495 - CV. To the extent possible, we would like for the briefing schedules in each of these appeals to remain the same. Therefore, we grant, in part, the request for extension filed on September 2, 2014 in cause number 01 - 14 - 00495 - CV. The deadline for each appellant to file a brief in these appeals is now September 12, 2014. Due the 180 day deadline for the Court to bring these cases to reso lution, no further extensions of the September 12, 2014 deadline will be considered. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court Date: September 4, 2014