alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 45 0 . LOUI S EUGENE ABRAM v . THE STATE.

A ju ry fo u n d Lo u i s Eu g en e Ab ram g ui l t y o f ch i l d m o les t at i o n, s tat u to ry rap e,

an d o t her cri m es

, an d h e was s en t en ced o n M ay 16 , 2 0 1 6

. He fi l ed a t i m el y m o t i o n

fo r n ew t ri al , wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed o n J ul y 2 8

, 2 0 20

. A b ram fi l ed a n o t i ce o f

ap p eal o n Au g u st 3 1 , 2 0 2 0

. Ho wev er, we l ack ju ri s d ict i o n

.

To b e t i m el y

, a n o ti ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l e d w i t h i n 30 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e

ap p eal ab l e o rd er. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 ( a )

. Th e p ro p er an d ti m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f

ap p eal i s an ab s o l u te req u i rem en t to co n fer j u ri s d i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Co u ch v.

Un i ted Pa per wo r ker s In t l

. Un i o n

, 2 2 4 Ga. Ap p. 72 1

, 7 2 1 (4 8 2 SE2 d 7 0 4 ) (1 9 9 7 ).

Ab ram ’ s n o t i ce o f ap p eal was u n t i m el y fi l ed 3 4 day s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e s eek s

t o ap p eal

. Acco rd i n g l y

, h i s no t i ce o f ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

, an d t h i s cas e i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

Becau s e Ab ram i s rep res en t ed b y co un s el

, h e i s i n fo rm ed o f t h e fo l l o wi n g in

acco rd an ce wi th Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e

, 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2 (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 95 ): Th i s ap p eal

h as b een d i s m i s sed b ecau s e o f y o u r co u n s el ’ s fai l ure t o fi l e a ti m el y n o ti ce o f ap p eal

.

If y o u s t i l l wi s h t o a p p e a l

, yo u m ay req u es t th e t ri al co u rt t o gran t an o u t -o f-t i m e

ap p eal

. If t he t ri al co u rt g ran t s an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

, y o u wi ll hav e 3 0 d ay s fro m t h at

g ran t i n wh i ch t o i n s t i g at e an ap p eal

. If t h e tri al co u rt d en i es y o u r req u es t fo r an o u t

o f-t im e ap p eal

, y o u m ay ap p eal t h at den i al b y fi l i n g a no t i ce of ap p eal wi t h i n 3 0 day s

o f t h e den ial

. If y o u n o l o n g e r wi s h t o ap p eal y o u r co n v i ct i o n, y o u n eed n o t d o

an y t h i n g el s e. Th e Cl erk o f Co u rt i s DIRECTED t o s en d a co p y o f t h is o rd er t o December 11, 2020Ab ram an d t o A bram ’ s at to rn ey

, an d t h e l at ter is al s o D IRECTED t o s en d a co p y to

Ab ram

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/11/2020
## us. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Admin istration

May 6 , 20 1 6 Evan Mortenson Certification Manager, Air Tractor Inc. P.O. Box 485 Olney, Texas 76374 Dear Mr. Mortenson, 800 Independence A v e . . S W Washington
. DC
. 20 59 1

This is in response to your April29 , 2016 letter requesting an extension ofthe comment period for this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled, Revision ofAirworthiness Standards for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes (Docket FAA20 15-1621 ). The NPRM comment period closes on May 13, 2016. We believe sufficient time exists for interested persons to submit comments, and as of May 4, 2016, have received over 17 comments. Therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration does not find it in the best interest of the public to extend the comment period. Your request for an extension of the comment period is denied. However, as stated in 14 Code of Federal Regulations§ 11.45, we will consider comments filed late if at all possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We have placed this response with your request in the rulemaking docket. Sincerely, 

# w

Director, Office ofRulemaking
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 2, 1995 (60), Para 60.33 Petitions, Etc.]
[Page 631]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.60.33  petitions, etc.

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII, petitions and papers were laid on the 
Clerk's desk and referred as follows:

       6. By the SPEAKER: Petition of the Common Council, city of 
     Buffalo, NY, relative to the funding reductions for the 
     Summer Youth Program; to the Committee on Appropriations.
       7. Also, petition of the Common Council, city of Buffalo, 
     NY, relative to the funding reductions to public housing; to 
     the Committee on Appropriations.
       8. Also, petition of the Common Council, city of Buffalo, 
     NY, relative to the funding reductions to the community 
     schools anticrime funds; to the Committee on Appropriations.
       9. Also, petition of the Common Council, city of Buffalo, 
     NY, relative to the funding reduction to the 20th community 
     development block grant funds; to the Committee on 
     Appropriations.
       10. Also, petition of the Common Council, city of Buffalo, 
     NY, relative to the funding reduction to the Home Energy 
     Assistance Program; to the Committee on Appropriations.
       11. Also, petition of the Common Council, city of Buffalo, 
     NY, relative to the funding reduction for Buffalo's lead 
     abatement grant; to the Committee on Appropriations.
       12. Also, petition of the comptroller of the city of New 
     York, NY, relative to a proposal outlining the peace bond 
     program and the creation of an Ireland Development Bank; to 
     the Committee on Banking and Financial Services.
       13. Also, petition of the Legislature of Rockland County, 
     NY, relative to the Summer Youth Employment Program funding; 
     to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.
       14. Also, petition of the Alexandria City Council, 
     Alexandria, VA, relative to a constitutional amendment 
     regarding the desecration of the American flag; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
       15. Also, petition of the National Association of Attorneys 
     General, Washington, DC, relative to vertical restraints 
     guidelines; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       16. Also, petition of the National Association of Attorneys 
     General, Washington, DC, relative to Department of Justice 
     memorandum of understanding on affirmative civil rights 
     enforcement; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       17. Also, petition of John Jamian, State representative, 
     Lansing, MI, relative to the 10th amendment to the U.S. 
     Constitution; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       18. Also, petition of the common council, city of Syracuse, 
     NY, relative to the Historic Homeownership Assistance Act; to 
     the Committee on Ways and Means.
       19. Also, petition of the National Association of Attorneys 
     General, Washington, DC, relative to opposing the national 
     lottery proposed by the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe of Idaho; 
     jointly, to the Committees on the Judiciary and Resources.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1775

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the restoration

of the prior law formula for the inclusion in gross income of social

security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1995

Mr. NADLER (for himself, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. MALONEY, and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

for the restoration of the prior law formula for the

inclusion in gross income of social security and tier 1

railroad retirement benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1775 IH

1 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF PRIOR LAW FORMULA FOR

2 INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME OF SOCIAL SE3 CURITY AND TIER 1 RAILROAD RETIREMENT

4 BENEFITS.

5 (a) RESTORATION OF PRIOR LAW INCLUSION FOR6 MULA.—Subsection (a) of section 86 of the Internal Reve7 nue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income for the taxable

9 year of any taxpayer described in subsection (b) (notwith10 standing section 207 of the Social Security Act) includes

11 social security benefits in an amount equal to the lesser

12 of—

13 ‘‘(1) one-half of the social security benefits re14 ceived during the taxable year, or

15 ‘‘(2) one-half of the excess described in sub16 section (b)(1).’’

17 (b) REPEAL OF ADJUSTED BASE AMOUNT.—Sub18 section (c) of section 86 of such Code is amended to read

19 as follows:

20 ‘‘(c) BASE AMOUNT.—For purposes of this section,

21 the term ‘base amount’ means—

22 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sub23 section, $25,000,

24 ‘‘(2) $32,000 in the case of a joint return, and

25 ‘‘(3) zero in the case of a taxpayer who—
3

•HR 1775 IH

1 ‘‘(A) is married as of the close of the tax2 able year (within the meaning of section 7703)

3 but does not file a joint return for such year,

4 and

5 ‘‘(B) does not live apart from his spouse at

6 all times during the taxable year.’’

7 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (A)

8 of section 871(a)(3) of such Code is amended by striking

9 ‘‘85 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the

12 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, June 14, 1995 (79), Para 79.28 Reported Bills Sequentially Referred]
[Page 914]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.79.28  reported bills sequentially referred

  Under clause 5 of rule X, bills and reports were delivered to the 
Clerk for printing, and bills referred as follows:

       Mr. COMBEST: Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 
     H.R. 1655. A bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
     1996 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of 
     the U.S. Government, the community management account, and 
     the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability 
     System, and for other purposes, with an amendment; referred 
     to the Committee on National Security for a period ending not 
     later than June 23, 1995, for consideration of such 
     provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee pursuant to clause 1(k), rule 
     X. (Rept. No. 104-138, Pt. 1). Ordered to be printed.
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, May 9, 1995 (62), Para 62.24 Leave of Absence]
[Page 652]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.62.24  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. ROGERS, for today and balance of the week; and
  To Miss COLLINS of Michigan, for today.
  And then,
```
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending July 23, 2011

----

Bank Branches, DomesticAtlanta          United Legacy Bank, Winter Park, Florida -- to establish a branch at 401 South Semoran Boulevard, Winter Park, and 425 US Highway 17-92 South, Longwood.            -Approved, July 22, 2011            Change in Bank ControlKansas City          Native American Bancorporation Co., Denver, Colorado -- change in bank control of Native American and its subsidiary bank, Native American Bank, National Association, Denver.            -Permitted, July 20, 2011            St. Louis          Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc., Rogers, Arkansas -- change in bank control of Pinnacle and its subsidiary bank, Pinnacle Bank, Rogers.            -Permitted, July 20, 2011            San Francisco          Syringa Bancorp, Boise, Idaho -- change in bank control of Syringa and its subsidiary bank, Syringa Bank, Boise.            -Permitted, July 19, 2011            Extensions of TimeChair, Committee on Bank Supervision          American Express Company, New York, New York -- extension to January 1, 2015, of the first-floor-period start date under the advanced approaches risk-based capital rule for bank holding companies.            -Granted, July 21, 2011            Cleveland          PNC Bank, National Association, Wilmington, Delaware -- extension to December 31, 2011, to establish an agreement corporation subsidiary, Harris Williams UK Holdings, LLC, Richmond, Virginia.            -Granted, July 22, 2011            MembershipRichmond          Great State Bank, Wilkesboro, North Carolina -- to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.            -Approved, July 20, 2011            St. Louis          The Union Bank of Mena, Mena, Arkansas -- to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.            -Approved, July 21, 2011            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.3




Basin Exploration, Inc.
370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3400
Denver, Colorado 80202


Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby authorize the reference to the following report prepared by Ryder
Scott Company in a Registration Statement on Forms S-3 and S-8 and in any
prospectus contained therein of filed by Basin Exploraton, Inc. with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission:

     1.   Estimated Future Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold
          and Royalty Interests (SEC Parameters) as of January 1, 1998.

     We further consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts"
in such Registration Statement and prospectuses, as such Registration Statement
may be amended.




                                                /s/  RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                     PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Houston, Texas
March 26, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-75801, 333-77211 and 333-85324 of MicroFinancial Incorporated each on Form
S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-122020 of MicroFinancial Incorporated
on Form S-3 of our report dated March 30, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of MicroFinancial Incorporated for the year ended December 31,
2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 30, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) The undersigned officers of Wilson Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge: 1.
	The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Clark WilsonClark WilsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2006/s/ Daniel AllenDaniel AllenVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Interlink Global Corporation (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bill
Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:April 28, 2008


                                      By: Bill Rodriguez
                                      Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1719 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1719

 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to limit farm program payments 
    to producers who earn less than $100,000 annually from off-farm 
                                sources.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1995

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to limit farm program payments 
    to producers who earn less than $100,000 annually from off-farm 
                                sources.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCOME LIMITATIONS ON RECEIPT OF FARM PROGRAM PAYMENTS.

    (a) Income Limitations on Receipt of Payments.--Section 1001 of the 
Food Security Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. 1308) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(8) Adjusted gross income limitation.--(A) A person who has an 
adjusted gross income of $100,000 or more from off-farm sources 
annually shall not be eligible to receive deficiency payments and land 
diversion payments described in paragraph (1) or other payments 
described in paragraph (2)(B).
    ``(B) For purposes of this paragraph:
            ``(i) The term `adjusted gross income' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 (26 U.S.C. 62).
            ``(ii) The term `off-farm sources' means sources of income 
        for a person unrelated to the production and sale of a 
        agricultural commodity by the person. Such term shall not 
        include interest or dividend income resulting from savings 
        derived from revenues from the production and sale of a 
        agricultural commodity.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to crop years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7919

ROBERT L. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE DEEDS, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-1088-R)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Because we find that no amendment to Appellant's complaint

could cure the defects in his case, the district court's order is

a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers

Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint* and denying his

motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Smith v. Deeds, No. CA-95-1088-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1995;

Oct. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary of Defense 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices. 

      ( print page 35975)    

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 0900, Friday, July 27, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey, CA. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203, 703-741-0300. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Department in planning and managing an effective and economical research and development program in the area of electron devices. 

The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on benefits to national defense. These reviews may form the basis for research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities, or in government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics, and electronic materials. 

In accordance with section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public. 

Dated: June 26, 2007. 

C. R. Choate, 

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison OFficer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 07-3210 Filed 6-29-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M