alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                                                      ----------

                    COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

 Statement Re: Computation of Net Income Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                                    September 30,                 September 30,
                                                 1996           1995           1996           1995
                                              -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C> 
Net Income                                    $ 1,076,238    $   466,999    $ 2,276,342    $ 4,648,276
                                              ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Primary Earnings Per Share:
---------------------------
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                           23,352,275     22,839,990     23,196,271     22,599,576

Dilutive effect of outstanding common
  equivalent shares                               339,110        962,276        421,483      1,024,573
                                              -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding         23,691,385     23,802,266     23,617,754     23,624,149
                                              ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Net income per common and common
  equivalent share                                   $.05           $.02           $.10           $.20
                                              ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:
---------------------------------
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                           23,352,275     22,839,990     23,196,271     22,599,576

Dilutive effect of outstanding common
  equivalent shares                               339,110        962,276        422,714      1,104,877
                                              -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding         23,691,385     23,802,266     23,618,985     23,704,453
                                              ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Net income per common and common
  equivalent share                                   $.05           $.02           $.10           $.20
                                              ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE> 


                                        17
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending March 25, 2006

|Filer                     | Filing Type             | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|KENTUCKY BANCSHARES, INC. | 3A1* 3A3                | Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. to acquire Peoples Bancorp of Sandy Hook, KY and as a result merge Peoples Bank into Kentucky Bank.                                                                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/17/2006   
|Newspaper:                | Not available          
|Federal Register:         | 04/17/2006             
|SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | * 18C* 4c8* 5D3* Branch | Sky Financial Group, Inc., Bowling Green, Ohio, to acquire Waterfield Mortgage Company, Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana, and indirectly, its thrift subsidiary, Union Federal Bank of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                | Not available          
|Federal Register:         | Not available          

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
9130071.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

In Re: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

12-md-02311 

Honorable Marianne O. Battani 

In Re: SPARK PLUG CASES 2:15-cv-03003 

THIS RELATES TO: 

IFEOMA ADAMS, et al, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Denso Corporation, Denso International 

America, Inc., Denso Automotive Deutschland 

GmBH, NGK Spark Plug Co. Ltd., NGK Spark 

Plugs (U.S.A.), Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, and 

Robert Bosch LLC, 

 

 Defendants

Case No. 2:15-cv-11868 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Gregory P. Hansel of the law firm of Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, 

LLP hereby enters his appearance as counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interest parties in the abovecaptioned matter. 

Dated: September 2, 2015 /s/ Gregory P. Hansel 

 Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, LLP 

 One City Center, PO Box 9546 

 Portland, ME 04112 

 Tel. 207-791-3000 

 Fax 207-791-3111 

 ghansel@preti.com

One of the attorneys for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, 

Interested Parties 

 

2:15-cv-03003-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/02/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 256
9130071.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on September 2, 2015 I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk 

for the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to ECF-registered counsel. 

 /s/ Gregory P. Hansel 

 Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, LLP 

 One City Center, PO Box 9546 

 Portland, ME 04112 

 Tel. 207-791-3000 

 Fax 207-791-3111 

 ghansel@preti.com

One of the attorneys for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, 

Interested Parties 

2:15-cv-03003-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/02/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 257
#### Elizabeth M. Burnham et al., Respondents, *v.*Arthur W. Burnham, Appellant.

*Burnham*v. *Burnham,*132 App. Div. 937, affirmed.

(Argued October 18, 1910;

decided November 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment tif the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May *59311, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered, upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to set aside a deed of real property.

*James W. Verbeck*and *Horace F. McKnight*for appellant.

*Charles C. Lester*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Vann, Webneb, Willabd Bartlett, Hisoooic and Chase, JJ.
#### The State ex rel. Sowers, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Sowers v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 141.]

(No. 96-2159

Submitted October 28, 1998

Decided December 9, 1998.)

*142
      *Dean G. Reinhard Co., L.P.A.,*and *Charles Zamora,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Gerald H. Waterman,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Stewart Jaffy & Associates, Stewart R. Jaffy*and *Marc J. Jaffy,*urging reversal for *amici curiae,*Ohio Association of Professional Fire Fighters and Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

*Per Curiam.*

On authority of *State ex rel. Justus v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 364, 700 N.E.2d 1, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending August 1, 2009

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|ALLIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. | 4c8            | Alliance Bancshares, Inc., to engage through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cuyler Street, LLC, both of Dalton, Georgia, in making, acquiring, brokering loans, or other extensions of credit. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not applicable
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST CMRL BK OF FL, ORLANDO, FLORIDA | 2737029 | 03/16/2009 | 07/24/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 23, 1995 (49), Para 49.10 Recorded Vote]
[Page 437]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.49.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mrs. ROUKEMA:

       Page 387, after line 10, insert the following:

     SEC. 768. STATE LAW AUTHORIZING SUSPENSION OF LICENSES.

       Section 466(a) (42 U.S.C. 666(a)), as amended by sections 
     715, 717(a), and 723 of this Act, is amended by adding at the 
     end the following:
       ``(15) Authority to withhold or suspend licenses.--
     Procedures under which the State has (and uses in appropriate 
     cases) authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the 
     use of driver's licenses, professional and occupational 
     licenses, and recreational licenses of individuals owing 
     overdue support or failing, after receiving appropriate 
     notice, to comply with subpoenas or warrants relating to 
     paternity or child support proceedings.''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

426

affirmative

Nays

5
```
§ 72.10-15 Vertical ladders not acceptable. ( a ) Vertical ladders and deck scuttles shall not in general be considered satisfactory as one of the required means of escape. However, where it is demonstrated that the installation of a stairway would be impracticable, a vertical ladder may be used as the second means of escape.
( b ) [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending July 19, 2008

|Filer                                                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE | * 3A3          | The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and to acquire one thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York. | Newspaper:07/28/2008Federal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                                                   | 07/28/2008    
|Federal Register:                                            | Not available 
|ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY, THE                                | * Branch       | The Adirondack Trust Company, Saratoga Springs, New York, requests approval to establish a full service branch at 376 Bay Road, Queensbury, Warren County, New York. (RSSD #3797990)                                                                                               | Newspaper:07/11/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                                   | 07/11/2008    
|Federal Register:                                            | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 19, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 10.6
 
 AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 
 This Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement (the “Amendment”) is dated March 8, 2011, between National Penn Bancshares, Inc., a Pennsylvania business corporation (“National Penn”) and Sandra L. Bodnyk (the "Grantee").
 
 BACKGROUND
 
 1.           On February 1, 2010, National Penn granted to the Grantee an aggregate of 21,000 shares of common stock of National Penn (the “Restricted Stock”) pursuant to the National Penn Bancshares, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).
 
 2.           In connection with the Restricted Stock grant, National Penn and the Grantee entered into a certain Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 1, 2010 (the “Grant Agreement”), which provided applicable terms and conditions as set forth therein.
 
 3.           Pursuant to section 15.2 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of National Penn’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) or any successor committee designated by the Board to administer the Plan (the “Committee”) may amend or modify any outstanding awards (e.g., Restricted Stock) in any manner to the extent that the Committee would have had the authority to initially make such an award; including, removing transfer or vesting restrictions on such awards.  However, any proposed amendment shall not alter or impair an outstanding award in a materially adverse manner, unless the Committee receives consent of the award recipient.
 
 4.           National Penn and the Grantee now desire to amend the Grant Agreement as hereinafter set forth, which does not alter or impair the Restricted Stock in a materially adverse manner.
 
 AGREEMENT
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and each intending to be legally bound, National Penn and the Grantee agree to amend the Grant Agreement as follows:
 
 1.           Background.  The matters set forth in the “Background” section of this Amendment are incorporated by reference herein.
 
 2.           Amendment.  Section 2 is hereby amended to add the following as a new section 2(l):
 
 (l)           TARP Compliance Period.  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all restrictions shall lapse with respect to all of the shares of Restricted Stock (and such shares shall become fully vested) at such time when the Corporation repurchases 100% of its total senior preferred stock from the U.S. Department of Treasury purchased pursuant to TARP.
 
 3.           Ratification.  As amended hereby, the Grant Agreement is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
 
 4.           Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the domestic internal law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first above written.
 
 NATIONAL PENN BANCSHARES, INC.
GRANTEEBy: /s/ J. Ralph Borneman, Jr.

J. Ralph Borneman, Jr.

Chairman, Compensation Committee
/s/ Sandra L. Bodnyk

Sandra L. BodnykWitness: /s/ H. Anderson Ellsworth
Exhibit 10.13



 






Exhibit 10.13




Mylan
Laboratories Inc.

Arrangements
for Director Compensation

In Effect as of
February 9, 2005


In accordance with guidance
provided by the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in late November 2004, Mylan
Laboratories Inc. (the “Company”) is providing a written description
of the oral compensation arrangements that the Company currently has with its
Board of Directors (“Board”), which the SEC may deem to be material
definitive agreements with the directors.


Effective as of July 30,
2004, non-employee directors receive $50,000 per year in cash compensation for
their service on the Board. Prior to July 30, 2004, the annual retainer paid to
such persons was $36,000, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for
its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2004 Proxy Statement”).
In addition, Milan Puskar receives an additional $200,000 per year for his
service as Chairman (as disclosed in the 2004 Proxy Statement). Non-employee
directors are also reimbursed for actual expenses relating to meeting attendance
and, at the discretion of the full Board, are eligible to receive stock options
or other awards under the Company’s 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan (each as
disclosed in the 2004 Proxy Statement). In July 2004, an immediately-exercisable
option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $14.82
per share, was awarded to each of the non-employee directors, as reported in the
applicable Statements of Changes in Beneficial Ownership on Form 4 filed with
the SEC. Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any
consideration for their service on the Board.


On February 9, 2005, the Board approved the following arrangements:




	•	
Effective February 10, 2005, non-employee directors (other than Mr. Puskar) will
receive fees for each Board meeting they attend (other than any Board meeting held primarily
to consider board compensation matters). The fee is $1,500 for each meeting
attended in person and $1,000 for each meeting attended by phone.





	•	
Effective February 10, 2005, non-employee directors will receive fees for each
Board Committee meeting they attend (other than: (i) Committee meetings held in
conjunction with Board meetings; (ii) any Committee meetings held primarily to
consider board compensation matters; and (iii) meetings of the Finance Committee
or of the Executive Committee). The fee is $750 for each meeting attended in
person and $500 for each meeting attended by phone.





	•	
Effective January 1, 2005, the Chairperson of the Audit Committee will receive
an additional fee of $10,000 per year.





	•	
Effective January 1, 2005, the Chairpersons of the Compensation Committee, the
Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Compliance Committee each will
receive an additional fee of $5,000 per year.