alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended June 30, 2010

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-10884

 

**SHELTER PROPERTIESIV**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
§ 10.61 General exemptions. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with regard to the Investigations Division; and the Federal Aviation Administrator, with regard to the FAA's Investigative Record System (DOT/FAA 815) may exempt from any part of the Act and this part except subsections (b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i) of the Act, and implementing §§ 10.35, 10.23(a) and (b), 10.21(d)(1) through (6), 10.81, 10.83, and 10.85 of this chapter, any systems of records, or portions thereof, which they maintain which consist wholly of; ( 1 ) Information compiled for the purpose of identifying individual criminal offenders and alleged offenders and consisting only of identifying data and notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and probation status;
( 2 ) Information compiled for the purpose of a criminal investigation, including reports of informants and investigators, and associated with an identifiable individual; or
( 3 ) Reports identifiable to an individual compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the criminal laws from arrest or indictment through release from supervision.
( b ) The requirements (including general notice) of sections 553(b)(1), (2) and (3), and (c) and (e) of title 5, United States Code, will be met by publication in appendix A to this part, which must, at a minimum, specify: ( 1 ) The name of the system; and
( 2 ) The specific provisions of the Act from which the system is to be exempted and the reasons therefor.
( c ) Any decision to exempt a system of records under this section is subject to concurrence by the General Counsel.
( d ) Any person may petition the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of part 5 of this title, to institute a rulemaking proceeding for the amendment or repeal of any exemptions established under this section.
[45 FR 8993, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 67697, Dec. 22, 1993; 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008]
NUMBER 13-21-00336-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

DAVID EUGENE WHITE, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 453rd District Court 

of Hays County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant David Eugene White perfected his appeal from his conviction for his third 

or more driving while intoxicated offense in cause number CR-20-0864-E in the 453rd 

District Court of Hays County, Texas.

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 49.04(b), 

1 This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin by order of 

the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (granting the supreme court the authority 

to transfer cases from one court of appeals to another at any time that there is “good cause” for the transfer).
2

49.09(b)(2).

During the pendency of this appeal, a motion to permanently abate the appeal was

filed on behalf of White. Attached to the motion is a public information disclosure sheet 

relating that White passed away on June 21, 2022. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 

§ 552.029(8). “If the appellant in a criminal case dies after an appeal is perfected but

before the appellate court issues the mandate, the appeal will be permanently abated.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2); see Garcia v. State, 840 S.W.2d 957, 958 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1992) (per curiam) (“The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal 

deprives . . . the court of appeals of jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, we hereby grant the 

motion filed on behalf of White and order this appeal permanently ABATED.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed on the

26th day of January, 2023.
§ 535.307 Agreements between or among wholly-owned subsidiaries and/or their parent—exemption. ( a ) An agreement between or among wholly-owned subsidiaries and/or their parent means an agreement under section 4 of the Act (46 U.S.C. 40301(a)-(c)) between or among an ocean common carrier or marine terminal operator subject to the Act and any one or more ocean common carriers or marine terminal operators which are ultimately owned 100 percent by that ocean common carrier or marine terminal operator, or an agreement between or among such wholly-owned carriers or terminal operators.
( b ) All agreements between or among wholly-owned subsidiaries and/or their parent are exempt from the filing requirements of the Act and this part.
( c ) Ocean common carriers are exempt from section 10(c) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 41105) to the extent that the concerted activities proscribed by that section result solely from agreements between or among wholly-owned subsidiaries and/or their parent.
( d ) The filing fee for optional filing of these agreements is provided in § 535.401(g).
[69 FR 64414, Nov. 4, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 50728, Oct. 1, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 515
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 515 appear at 67 FR 39860, June 11, 2002, and 70 FR 7669, Feb. 15, 2005.

§ 515.5 Forms and fees. ( a ) *Forms.* License Application Form FMC-18 is found at the Commission's website *www.fmc.gov* for completion on-line by applicants and licensees. Foreign-based Unlicensed NVOCC Registration/Renewal Form FMC-65 and financial responsibility Forms FMC-48, FMC-67, FMC-68, FMC-69 may be obtained from the Commission's website at *www.fmc.gov ,* from the Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, or from any of the Commission's Area Representatives.
( b ) *Filing of license application forms.* All application forms are to be filed electronically.
( c ) *Fees.* ( 1 ) ( i ) All fees shall be paid by: ( A ) Money order, certified, cashier's, or personal check payable to the order of the “Federal Maritime Commission;”
( B ) *Pay.gov;*
( C ) The Automated Clearing House system; or
( D ) By other means authorized by the Director of the Commission's Office of Budget and Finance.
( ii ) Applications or registrations shall be rejected unless the applicable fee and any bank charges assessed against the Commission are received by the Commission within ten (10) business days after submission of the application or registration. In any instance where an application has been processed in whole or in part, the fee will not be refunded.
( 2 ) Fees under this part shall be as follows: ( i ) Application for new OTI license as required by § 515.12(a): Filing $1,304.
( ii ) Application for change to OTI license or license transfer as required by § 515.20(a) and (b): Filing $943.
[80 FR 68732, Nov. 5, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 59144, Aug. 29, 2016; 83 FR 50294, Oct. 5, 2018; 84 FR 62467, Nov. 15, 2019; 88 FR 16898, Mar. 21, 2023]
§ 95.60-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels other than motorboats.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending April 4, 2009

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|BEARTOOTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1          | Beartooth Financial Corporation, Billings, Montana to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Beartooth Bank, Billings, Montana.                                                                                                                 | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/10/2009    
|Newspaper:                      | Not available 
|Federal Register:               | 04/10/2009    
|MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION  | 4c8            | Mackinac Financial Corporation, Manistique, Michigan, proposes to acquire 10% of Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC, Troy, Michigan, and thereby indirectly engage in financial and investment advisory activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                         | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|AMERICAN ST BK OF PIERRE, PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA | 600651 | 12/01/2008 | 03/23/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 26, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.220 Recognition of a classification society. ( a ) A classification society must be recognized by the Commandant before it may receive statutory authority delegated by the Coast Guard.
( b ) In order to become recognized, a classification society must meet the requirements of § 8.230.
( c ) A classification society found to meet the criteria for recognition will be notified in writing by the Commandant.
( d ) If the Coast Guard determines that a classification society does not meet the criteria for recognition, the Coast Guard will provide the reason for this determination.
( e ) A classification society may reapply for recognition upon correction of the deficiencies identified by the Coast Guard.
45.0 Industrial Cleaning Solvents. (2010 revision, draft 1) 11/29/1994 mm/dd/20 I0 45.1 Applicability. 45.1.1 The provisionsof45.0 of this regulation apply to all Sources that use organic solvents for the purpose ofcleaning. The provisions of45.3, 45.4, and 45.5 of this regulation do not apply to the following sources: 

### ***** 45.1.1.4 Any source that H5e5-emits less than 4,540 kilograms (five tons) of volatile organic compounds eleaning seh'ent per year from all cleaning activitiesat the facilitv. *****
#### Miller et *al.*v. Purchase *et ux.*

By Section 2590, Comp. Laws, which provides that “either husband or wife may enter into any engagement or transaction with the other, or with any other person, respecting property, which either might, if unmarried,” a married woman is authorized to execute a promissory note with her husband; and she is liable thereon, though the note is given for the individual debt of the husband.

(Syllabus by the Court.

Opinion filed April 3, 1894.)

Appeal from circuit court, Marshall county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge.

Action on a promissory note by John G. Miller *&*Co. against Herbert S. Purchase and Rhoda Purchase, his wife. The action was dismissed as to Rhoda Purchase, and plaintiffs appeal.

Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Turner & McCoy (William JE. Church, of Counsel),*for appellants.

*James*Wells, for respondents.

Corson, P. J.

This was an action upon a promissory note executed by the defendants as makers. The defendants answered and the material part of the answer as to the defendant Rhoda Purchase is as follows: “The defendant Rhoda Purchase alleges, as a separate defense, that she is not liable on said 'note for the reason that she is a married woman; that the defendants are husband and wife, and at the time of the execution of said note were living together, as such, at Newark, S. D.; that the consideration for said note was a pre-existing debt of the defendant Herbert S. Purchase; that no-part of the *233consideration for said note inured for the benefit of the defendant Rhoda Purchase, or her separate estate; and that by signing said note she did not thereby intend to bind her separate estate.” The court found the facts substantially as alleged in the paragraph of the answer quoted, and therefrom stated his conclusions of law as follows: “Second. The said note, as to Rhoda Purchase is void, and of no force and effect; and it is ordered that, this action, as to her, be dismissed, and that she have judgment of dismissal, and for her costs and disbursements.” Upon these findings and conclusions of law, judgment was rendered dismissing the action as to the defendant Rhoda Purchase.

The only question presented is, did the court err in his conclusion of law, and in dismissing the action as to the defendant Rhoda Purchase? This case, as to the pleadings, findings of fact! conclusions of law, and judgment, is substantially the same as was that in the case of Mortgage Co. v. Bradley, 55 N. W. 1108 (recently decided by this court), and must be ruled by the decision in that case. As that case was decided upon a very full consideration, we do not deem it necessary to again discuss the question decided therein. We shall therefor make substantially the same order that was made in that case. The judgment of the circuit court in favor of the defendant Rhoda Purchase is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to the said court to modify the second conclusion of law to make it conform to this opinion, and to'enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and against the said Rhoda Purchase.
#### § 61.15-1 Scope.

In conducting hydrostatic tests on piping, the required test pressure must be maintained for a sufficient length of time to permit an inspection to be made of all joints and connections. The setting of the relief valve or safety valve will be considered as establishing the maximum allowable working pressure of the system.

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18890, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48050, Sept. 18, 1995]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1728

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to undertake the necessary feasibility

studies regarding the establishment of certain new units of the National

Park System in the State of Hawaii.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to undertake the

necessary feasibility studies regarding the establishment

of certain new units of the National Park System in

the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STUDIES OF POTENTIAL NATIONAL PARK SYS4 TEM UNITS IN HAWAII.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act6 ing through the Director of the National Park Service,

7 shall undertake feasibility studies regarding the establish-
2

HR 1728 IH

1 ment of National Park System units in the following areas

2 in the State of Hawaii:

3 (1) Island of Maui: The shoreline area known

4 as ‘‘North Beach’’, immediately north of the present

5 resort hotels at Kaanapali Beach, in the Lahaina

6 district in the area extending from the beach inland

7 to the main highway.

8 (2) Island of Lanai: The mountaintop area

9 known as ‘‘Hale’’ in the central part of the island.

10 (3) Island of Kauai: The shoreline area from

11 ‘‘Anini Beach’’ to ‘‘Makua Tunnels’’ on the north

12 coast of this island.

13 (4) Island of Molokai: The ‘‘Halawa Valley’’ on

14 the eastern end of the island, including its shoreline,

15 cove and lookout/access roadway.

16 (b) KALAUPAPA SETTLEMENT BOUNDARIES.—The

17 studies conducted under this section shall include a study

18 of the feasibility of extending the present National His19 toric Park boundaries at Kalaupapa Settlement eastward

20 to Halawa Valley along the island’s north shore.

21 (c) REPORT.—A report containing the results of the

22 studies under this section shall be submitted to the Con23 gress promptly upon completion.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Skeletal Biology Structure and Regeneration Study Section, June 3, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 5, 2007, 5 p.m. The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 9, 2007, 72 FR 26411-26412.                

The meeting will be held June 4, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 5, 2007, 5 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 14, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2485 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M