alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 503.11 Materials to be published. The Commission shall separately state and concurrently publish the following materials in the Federal Register or on its public Web site (*www.fmc.gov*) for the guidance of the public: ( a ) Descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which the officers from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may secure information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions.
( b ) Statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available.
( c ) Rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations.
( d ) Substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency.
( e ) Every amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 64 FR 23547, May 3, 1999; 80 FR 52640, Sept. 1, 2015]
#### In the Matter of Juan R. M. Hernandez.

• Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
HOMER LAMAR TUCKER

,

Appellant,

v.

A.I.G INSURANCE, & E/C

SERVICING AGENT

,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CAS E NO. 1D 16

- 2050

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings, Office of the

Judges of Compensation Claims, West Palm Beach District Office.

Mary A. D'Ambrosio , Jud ge

.

Homer Lamar Tucker, pro se

, Appellant.

Hinda Klein and Brian L. Ellison of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-21082

Summary Calendar

_____________________

CULLEN CENTER BANK & TRUST,

Plaintiff,

versus

INVESTMENT CHOICES CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendants.

DOV ANVI KAMINETZKY,

Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-95-4403)

_______________________________________________________

October 24, 1996

Before REAVLEY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

The order of contempt and commitment, dated December 1,

1995, is affirmed for the following reasons.

Dov Kaminetzky and his company, Investment Choices, were

liable to Cullen Bank for obligations due for a car wash

operation. Kaminetzky filed frivolous claims against the

successor to Cullen Bank, and many others, because of the

liabilities of the car wash and other operations. When the

district court dismissed those claims, it entered on March 16,

1995 an order enjoining Kaminetzky from filing any action raising

an issue alleged in the prior cases without first obtaining

judicial approval. The court’s order put Kaminetzky on notice

that a violation could be punished by criminal contempt.

On September 7, 1995, Kaminetzky filed a notice of removal

in federal court, seeking to remove a state court suit between

him and Cullen Bank wherein the Bank sought to recover an

obligation owed because of the car wash operation. No judicial

approval was sought or obtained for this filing, itself

frivolous.

The district judge gave Kaminetzky notice that he would be

ordered to appear and show cause why he should not be held in

contempt for violation of the March 16 order, which order the

judge read to Kaminetzky.

The hearing was held on December 1, 1995, at which time,

after hearing testimony from Kaminetzky and argument by his

attorney, the court found Kaminetzky to have committed a knowing
3

and willful violation of the March 16 order and remended him to

imprisonment for 48 hours.

Kaminetzky argues that he had inadequate notice of his

violation and of the criminal contempt hearing. The evidence

reflects no uncertainty about the proceeding and about the

violation. The court’s findings are supported and its order is

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Dora Friedman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harris Friedman, Deceased, Respondent, for an Order Directing Thomas J. O’Neill, an Attorney, Appellant, to Turn over Certain Moneys.

*Matter of Friedman,*136 App. Div. 750, affirmed.

(Argued June 1, 1910;

decided June 17, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 4, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the appellant to pay certain moneys to the petitioner.

*M. L. MalevinsJcy*and *Thomas J. O'Weill*for appellant.

*Maurice Wagler*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Cpncur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
#### § 78.07-1 Notice and reporting of casualty and voyage records.

The requirements for providing notice and reporting of marine casualties and for retaining voyage records are contained in part 4 of this chapter.

[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47535, Dec. 14, 1987]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending April 3, 2010

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PALM BANCORP, INC. | CIC           | Prior change in control notice filed by Marty E. Adams, Salineville, Ohio; Kevin T. Thompson, Saint Augustine, Florida; and John S. Loeber, Travelers Rest, South Carolina; to acquire control of Palm Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiary bank, The Palm Bank, both of Tampa, Florida. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/09/2010
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 02/09/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location     | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FLORIDA BK, TAMPA, FLORIDA | 704737 | 10/19/2009 | 03/04/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 09/28/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 33
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending August 14, 2010

|Filer                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|ANCHOR BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | Anchor Bancorp, Inc., Lacey, Washington, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Anchor Mutual Savings Bank, Aberdeen, Washington, upon conversion from a mutual savings bank to a stock savings bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/15/2010
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 04/15/2010   
|RBB BANCORP          | * 3A1         | RBB Bancorp, Los Angeles, California, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Royal Business Bank, Los Angeles, California.                                                                            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/10/2010
|Newspaper:           | Not available
|Federal Register:    | 09/10/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
BEFORE THE COMMISSION OF FIVE JUDGES APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Jonathan P. Hein

Case No. 98-2388

REVISED INTERIM ORDER

Due to a clerical error at the Supreme Court that caused complainant’s counsel to receive untimely notice of the five-judge commission’s order dated December 18, 1998, the commission hereby orders that the complainant’s attorney file his requested attorney fees and accompanying affidavit in accordance with DR 2-106 no later than January 21, 1999. The attorney fees are to be itemized by date, time, and service performed with the hourly rate charged, and the affidavit of the complainant’s attorney shall address each of the items stated in DR 2 — 106(B). On or before January 28, 1999, the respondent may file a response 'to the complainant’s affidavit. The complainant’s affidavit and the respondent’s reply shall be filed in the manner set forth in the Supreme Court’s order of November 16,1998 with a copy served on opposing counsel or the opposing party if not represented by counsel.

The five-judge commission will determine the reasonableness and necessity of the attorney’s fees and deposition costs requested by complainant based on the pleadings before the commission at that time. Thereafter, the final order of the five-judge commission shall issue pursuant to Rule II, Section 5(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio.

*1467Date: January 19,1999

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION.

Richard A. Dove Secretary of the Commission
#### § 78.12-1 Posting of stability letter.

If a stability letter is issued under § 170.120 of this chapter, it must be posted under glass or other suitable transparent material in the pilothouse of the vessel.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51007, Nov. 4, 1983]
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 67 FR 61011, Sept. 27, 2002, 70 FR 56089, Sept. 23, 2005, and 70 FR 73159, Dec. 9, 2005.

§ 107.125 Appeal. ( a ) A person who requested reconsideration under § 107.123 and is denied the relief requested may appeal to the Administrator. The appeal must— ( 1 ) Be in writing or by electronic means and filed within 30 days of receipt of the Associate Administrator's decision on reconsideration;
( 2 ) State in detail any alleged errors of fact and law;
( 3 ) Enclose any additional information needed to support the appeal; and
( 4 ) State in detail the modification of the final decision sought.
( b ) The Administrator, if necessary to avoid a risk of significant harm to persons or property, may declare the Associate Administrator's action effective pending a decision on appeal.
( c ) The Administrator grants or denies, in whole or in part, the relief requested and informs the appellant in writing or by electronic means of the decision. The Administrator's decision is the final administrative action.
[Amdt. 107-38, 61 FR 21095, May 9, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 463, Jan. 5, 2011; 85 FR 83374, Dec. 21, 2020]
§ 44.01-10 Approval by Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, of special service. ( a ) Subject to the conditions contained in this part, the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, has determined that load lines at variance from the position fixed by the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, but not above the actual line of safety, may be assigned steam colliers, barges, or self-propelled barges (separately by class) for certain specifically limited coastwise voyages between ports of the continental United States or between islands of a group over which the United States has jurisdiction.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16755, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10076, July 12, 1968]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 21, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NEEDHAM BK, NEEDHAM, MASSACHUSETTS | 339773 | 10/20/2008 | 02/23/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.420 Classification society authorization to participate in the Alternate Compliance Program. ( a ) The Commandant may authorize a recognized classification society to participate in the ACP. Authorization will be based on a satisfactory review of: ( 1 ) Applicable class rules; and
( 2 ) Applicable classification society procedures.
( b ) Authorization for a recognized classification society to participate in the ACP will require development of a U.S. supplement to the society's class rules that meets the requirements of § 8.430 of this part, which must be accepted by the Coast Guard.
( c ) A recognized classification society: ( 1 ) Will be eligible to receive authorization to participate in the ACP only after the Coast Guard has delegated to it the authority to issue the following certificates: ( i ) International Load Line Certificate;
( ii ) International Tonnage Certificate;
( iii ) Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate;
( iv ) Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate; and
( v ) International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate; and
( 2 ) Must have performed a delegated function related to general vessel safety assessment, as defined in § 8.100 of this part, for a two-year period.
( d ) If, after this two-year period, the Coast Guard finds that the recognized classification society has not demonstrated the necessary satisfactory performance or lacks adequate experience, the recognized classification society will not be eligible to participate in the ACP. The Coast Guard will provide the reason for this determination to the recognized classification society. A classification society may appeal the decision of the Coast Guard concerning recognition to the Commandant in writing in accordance with 46 CFR 1.03-15(h)(4).
( e ) The Coast Guard will enter into a written agreement with a recognized classification society authorized to participate in the ACP. This agreement will define the scope, terms, conditions and requirements of the necessary delegation. Conditions of this agreement are presented in § 8.130.
[CGD 95-010, 62 FR 67532, Dec. 24, 1997, as amended by USCG 2004-19823, 74 FR 20419, May 4, 2009]
#### The State ex rel. Filkill, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Filkill v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 111.]

(No. 98-744

Submitted October 12, 1998

Decided December 9, 1998.)

' *Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Michael A. Vanderhorst,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and enter judgment pursuant to *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
___________ No. 95-2709

___________ Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation, * * Appellant, * *

v. * * Commissioner of Internal Revenue,* * Appellee. * _________________________________* * Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation, * Inc., Transferee, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United * States Tax Court * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Commissioner of Internal Revenue,* * Appellee. * _________________________________* * Twentieth Century Holiness * Tabernacle, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal Revenue,* * Appellee. * _________________________________* * Music Square Church, Inc., * Transferee, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal Revenue,* * Appellee. *

### The Honorable David Laro, United States Tax Court Judge. 1



### 2 __________________________ Submitted: March 12, 1996 Filed: July 12, 1996

__________________________
Before MAGILL, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

__________________________

PER CURIAM.

The Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation, Inc., Twentieth Century Ho liness Tabernac le, and Music Square Church, Inc., appeal the tax court's 1 decisions granting the Commissioner's motions for summary judgment. Havin g carefully reviewed the record and the parties' b riefs, we conclude that no

error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
98-1894.

#### State v. Fields.

Hamilton App. No. C-930638. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





1.  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Group Holdings, Inc. fka, Oasis Online Technologies Corp., a Minnesota company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q A/1 for the Quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending June 12, 2010

|Filer                            | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|MidCoast Community Bancorp, Inc. | 3A1            | MidCoast Community Bancorp, Inc., Wilmington, DE, to become a bank holding company in connection with the reorganization of MidCoast Community Bank, Wilmington, DE, merging with and into Interim MidCoast Community Bank, Wilmington, DE. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                       | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable
|TOWER BANCORP INC.               | * 3A5          | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA.                                                                                                                                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/09/2010     
|Newspaper:                       | Not available 
|Federal Register:                | 04/09/2010    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us