alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 8, 2006                                       /s/ Jeffery Strickland
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Jeffery Strickland
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



     The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and not for any other purpose.


                                       22
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer of Collegiate Pacific Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the “Report”) ofCollegiate Pacific Inc. for the annual period ended June 30, 2005; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on suchevaluation; and(c) disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this Report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 21, 2006     /s/ William R. Estill     William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1574

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude

certain bank products from the definition of a deposit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Insurance Fund

5 and Depositor Protection Act of 1995’’.
2

HR 1574 RFS

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DEPOSIT.

2 Section 3(l)(5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act

3 (12 U.S. C. 1813(l)(5) is amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

5 the end;

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period

7 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

8 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph:

10 ‘‘(C) any liability of an insured depository

11 institution that arises under an annuity con12 tract, the income of which is tax deferred under

13 section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code of

14 1986.’’.

15 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

16 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

17 any liability of an insured depository that arises under an

18 annuity contract issued on or after the date of enactment

19 of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 12,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Presidential Documents

32771 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 113 

Wednesday, June 13, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8156 of June 11, 2007 

Father’s Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Father’s Day, we reflect on the many ways that fathers contribute to 

the lives of their children with spoken words and unspoken kindness. 

Fathers are one of the most important influences in the lives of children, 

and their unconditional love is an indispensable anchor of certainty and 

strength. By placing their family’s well-being above their own, fathers provide 

children with an example of what it means to be a responsible person. 

Through unwavering devotion and daily sacrifice, fathers work to create 

an environment where children are protected and encouraged. Fathers instill 

in their children an understanding of right and wrong and help them to 

grow in confidence and character. These dedicated men strive to give their 

sons and daughters the necessary foundation to make good choices and 

lead lives of purpose. 

On Father’s Day and throughout the year, we honor the men who have 

taken on the great joy and responsibility of fatherhood, and we celebrate 

their extraordinary impact and influence. All Americans are especially grateful to the many fathers who are serving their country as members of the 

Armed Forces, and we lift them and their loved ones up in prayer. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, in accordance with a joint resolution of the Congress approved 

April 24, 1972, as amended (36 U.S.C. 109), do hereby proclaim June 17, 

2007, as Father’s Day. I encourage all Americans to express admiration 

and appreciation to fathers for their many contributions to our Nation’s 

children. I direct the appropriate officials of the Government to display 

the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on this day. 

I also call upon State and local governments and citizens to observe this 

day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
32772 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 13, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day 

of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2948 

Filed 6–12–07; 8:47 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32
                                                            ----------

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Diversified  Historic
Investors  VI on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,  2002  as
filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  hereof
(the "Report"), I, Spencer Wertheimer, President and Treasurer of  the
Company's managing partner, EPK, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects, the financial condition and results of  operations
of the Company.



Date: March 9, 2006                            /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      -------------                           -----------------------
                                        Name:  Spencer Wertheimer
                                        Title: President (principal
                                                executive officer,
                                                principal financial
                                                officer) of the
                                                registrant's managing
                                                partner, EPK, Inc.

<PAGE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WILLIAM H. ARMSTRONG,

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 

Respondent. 

____________________ 

2011-3015 

______________________

 

 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board 

in Case No. DC0752080188-M-1. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

KEVIN E. BYRNES, Grad, Logan & Klewans, P.C. of Falls 

Church, Virginia, argued for petitioner. 

CHRISTOPHER A. BOWEN, Trial Attorney, Commercial 

Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him 

on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, 

JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and KENNETH M. DINTZER, 

Assistant Director. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 November 21, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, April 4, 1995 (55), Para 55.17 Recorded Vote]
[Page 531]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.55.17  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendments en bloc submitted by Mr. DORNAN:

       Page 2, line 7, strike ``section 6'' and insert ``section 
     4''.
       Page 2, strike line 9 through line 12 and insert ``person 
     may not require or otherwise seek the response of a minor to 
     a survey or questionnaire''.
       Page 3, line 5, strike ``Any inquiry'' and insert ``Any 
     individual inquiry''.
       Page 3, beginning at line 19, strike sections 3 and 4 (and 
     redesignate the subsequent sections accordingly.)

It was decided in the

Yeas

131

negative

Nays

291
```
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Partners
MinnTex Investment Partners LP:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Numbers 333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and
33-09485) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the balance sheets of MinnTex
Investment Partners LP as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation.



Dallas,
Texas
March 16, 2006

---



QuickLinks
§ 76.23-15 Controls. ( a ) The controls for the system shall be outside the spaces protected, and shall not be located in such space as might be cut off or made inaccessible in the event of fire in any of the spaces protected. The control space shall be marked as required by § 78.47-18 of this subchapter. It shall not be necessary to start the pumps from the control space.
( b ) Distribution piping to the various zones shall be controlled from one station. Each branch line to the various zones shall be fitted with a stop valve which shall be marked as required by § 78.47-15 of this subchapter.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16940, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58347, Sept. 30, 2004]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 109 (Thursday, June 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31658-31659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Announcement of the Fall 2007 Unsolicited Grant Initiative; 
Effective October 1, 2007

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency announces its Unsolicited Grant Initiative, which 
offers support for research, education and training, and the 
dissemination of information on international peace and conflict 
resolution. The Unsolicited initiative is open to any project that 
falls within the Institute's broad mandate of international conflict 
resolution.
    Deadline: October 1, 2007; Application material available on 
request and at http://www.usip.org/grants.

[[Page 31659]]


DATES: Receipt of Application: October 1, 2007. Notification Date: 
March 31, 2008.

ADDRESSES: For application package: United States Institute of Peace 
Grant Program, 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-
3011, (202) 429-3842 (phone), (202) 833-1018 (fax), (202) 457-1719 
(TTY), e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2b5a0b3bca6a192a7a1bba2fcbda0b5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b3a6b5baa0a794a1a7bda4fabba6b3">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Grant Program, Unsolicited Grants, 
Phone (202) 429-3842, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9beabb8b7adaa99acaab0a9f7b6abbe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e28590838c9691a297918b92cc8d9085">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 4, 2007.
Michael Graham,
Vice President for Administration.
[FR Doc. 07-2832 Filed 6-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 550.503 Subpoenas.

In proceedings under this part, the Commission may by subpoena compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, documents, and other evidence.
**Exhibit 10.37**
**Employment Arrangements of Named Executive Officers**
     We have no current employment agreements with Messrs. Opsal, Renner or Shiau, three ofour named executive officers for fiscal year 2005. Mr. Shiau’s employment with the companyended in April 2005.
     Under their respective employment arrangements, the named executive officers currentlyreceive:
 **•** An annual base salary subject to review by the board and our president or chiefexecutive officer. Their base salaries as of May 1, 2005 were as follows:     **Name** **Base Salary** Jon Opsal $254,592 Brian Renner $190,000 
 **•** An annual bonus based upon our achievement of operating targets and the attainmentof individual goals by each named executive, each to be determined by the board and ourpresident or chief executive officer on an annual basis;  **•** Customary fringe benefits including automobile allowances, life insurance and acafeteria benefits plan; and  **•** Stock options as determined from time to time by our board of directors.
Due to a restructuring of our management in April 2005, Mr. Renner is no longer an executiveofficers of the company although he continues to be an employee.
     Certain of the stock option agreements with our named executive officers provide that in theevent of a change of control, the executive may be entitled to immediate vesting of his otherwiseunvested stock options.
**Employment Arrangement of Papken Der Torossian**
     Papken Der Torossian is an employee of the company and receives $200,000 a year for hisservices as Chairman of the Board. In lieu of providing Mr. Der Torossian medical insurancebenefits, the company reimburses him for the medical insurance premiums he pays. This amounttotaled $10,160 for the 2005 fiscal year.
     Our non-employee directors generally receive an initial stock option grant of 20,000 sharesand yearly grants of 10,000 shares, but Mr. Der Torossian received an initial stock option grant in2003 of 400,000 shares and a stock option grant in fiscal year 2005 of 100,000 shares.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GERALD DAMONE HOPPER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Senior District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-95-119-V) Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: May 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Damone Hopper, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michel Smith, David Culver Keesler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gerald Damone Hopper appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for an order to show cause why two prosecutors and a government witness should not be held in criminal contempt and denying his motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the recordand the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hopper leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hopper , No. CR-95-119-V (W.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION     I, Michael J. Blumenfeld, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) of CollegiatePacific Inc. for the annual period ended June 30, 2006;2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;(c) disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this Report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 27, 2006       /s/ Michael J. Blumenfeld     Michael J. Blumenfeld, Chairman and Chief    Executive Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending October 28, 2006

----

Banks, Nonmember, And Miscellaneous InstitutionsE*TRADE Bank, Arlington, Virginia  -- request for exemptions from section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.					-Granted, October 23, 2006 					

Board OperationsDivision of Banking Supervision and Regulation  -- appointment of Arthur W. Lindo as Deputy Associate Director and Robert T. Maahs as Assistant Director.					-Approved, October 26, 2006 					

EnforcementJ.P. Morgan Chase & Co., New York, New York  -- written agreement dated July 28, 2003, terminated October 26, 2006.					-Announced, October 27, 2006 					Prineville Bancorporation, Prineville, Oregon, and Community First Bank  -- written agreement dated December 20, 2004, terminated October 18, 2006.					-Announced, October 27, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: November 2, 2006