alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                     41,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,594
<PP&E>                                          79,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,793
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,742
<SALES>                                        129,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,974
<CGS>                                           55,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending February 12, 2011

|Filer                             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS BANCORP OF HICKMAN, INC. | CIC         | Notice by the Coffey Family control group, Hickman, Kentucky, to retain control of Citizens Bancorp of Hickman, Inc., Hickman, Kentucky. The Coffey Family control group consists of Avery Coffey, Carla Coffey, Briley N. Coffey, James Coffey, Harold P. Coffey, Jr., Jill Coffey, Brooke Coffey, James Benjamin Coffey, Jentrie Coffey, Sue Werner, all of Hickman, Kentucky; and Patsy Campbell, Fulton, Kentucky. | Newspaper:02/03/2011Federal Register:02/01/2011
|Newspaper:                        | 02/03/2011 
|Federal Register:                 | 02/01/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Bill Rodriguez certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Interlink Global
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.




Date: March 15, 2008


                          By: Bill Rodriguez
                          Chief Financial Officer



                                                                              31
DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

Operating Standards

Aerospective, LLC

Joseph Charron, Owner/Member

13 October 2015
Pre-Flight Tasks

1. Ensure written permission is obtained by property owners prior to flight

operations.

2. Conduct a pre-mission brief with visual observer and establish UAS

flight plan and objectives.

3. Contact property owner who has authorized UAS flight operation on

their property. 

4. Contact adjacent property owners and notify them of

impeding UAS flight operations.

5. Set out orange traffic cones on both sides of the subject property.

6. Set out flight operations flag.

Operating Standards

1. Conduct UAS flight operations ONLY during daylight hours and VFR 

conditions. Limit flight to 400 ft AGL or below, and observe all property and 

privacy rights.

2. Visual Safety Observer will monitor airspace for other aircraft and

surrounding area for potential hazards.

3. Visual Safety Observer has the right to terminate flight at any time if safety is

jeopardized.

Post-Operation Tasks

4. Power down all equipment and remove flight battery and propellers from 

UAS.

5. After flight operations are completed, notify property owners, secure

traffic cones and flight operations flag.
Dear Mr. Caskey:

We are reviewing your petition for amendment to your exemption (Docket No. FAA-2014-0908) 

in which you seek regulatory relief to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to perform roof 

inspections at night. 

Your letter of petition states, in part, “SkyPhilly is requesting only partial relief from limitation 

#15 and seeking permission to operate up to 4 hours after sunset. SkyPhilly will still maintain 

visual flight rules and only fly under VFR conditions.” However, your petition did not include a 

safety case or specific operating procedures on how you plan to maintain an equivalent level of 

safety at night. Examples include, but are not limited to, crew qualifications and responsibilities, 

safety mitigations to avoid a collision at night, aircraft lighting systems, emergency procedures, 

dark adaptation to night flight, supplemental illumination for filming area and/or the control 

station, and procedures to ensure the illumination does not degrade the dark adaptation of the 

pilot or visual observer.

A safety case is required for nighttime operations by Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 5, 

Section 3, Paragraph 16-5-3-7(I). The required components of a safety case and safety case 

format may be found in Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 7, Section 1, Paragraph 16-7-1-3.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/22/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50600 c/w

No. 97-50601 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTURO MOLINA-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC Nos. EP-96-CR-764-1 & EP-92-CR-115-6

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arturo Molina-Moreno (Molina) appeals the sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release, arguing that it is plainly unreasonable. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and conclude that the 24-month sentence imposed is not unreasonable given the mandates of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g), the maximum sentence of 24 months delineated by that statute, and the circumstances of the offense that generated the revocation. See United States v. Giddings , 37 F.3d 1091, 1092-93, (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 514 U.S. 1008 (1995); United States v.No. 97-50600 c/w 97-50601 -2- Headrick , 963 F.2d 777, 782 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Mathena , 23 F.3d 87, 93 n.13 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.
#### § 67.143 Restriction on withdrawal of application.

A vessel owner making application pursuant to § 67.141 may not withdraw that application without mortgagee consent if a mortgage has been filed against the vessel. Consent of the mortgagee is evidenced by filing a properly completed original Application, Consent, and Approval for Withdrawal of Application for Documentation or Exchange of Certificate of Documentation (form CG-4593).

[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993]
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000427

26-SEP-2018

07:54 AM
2:15-cv-11941-PDB-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 06/26/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 35
2:15-cv-11941-PDB-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 06/26/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 36
2:15-cv-11941-PDB-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 06/26/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 37
#### § 1018.71 Referral of a compromise offer.

The Board may refer a debtor's firm written offer of compromise which is substantial in amount to GAO or to DOJ if the Board is uncertain whether the offer should be accepted.
Exhibit
21.1








Dynex
Capital, Inc.


List of
Consolidated Entities


As of
December 31, 2007











Dynex
Commercial Services, Inc.


Dynex
Securities, Inc.


GLS
Capital Services, Inc.


GLS Development, Inc.


SMFC
Funding Corporation


MSC I
L.P.


Issued
Holdings Capital Corporation


Commercial Capital Access One,
Inc.


Resource Finance Co. One


Resource Finance Co. Two


ND Holding Co.


MERIT Securities
Corporation


Financial Asset Securitization,
Inc.


GLS Capital, Inc.


GLS Properties, LLC


Allegheny Commercial Properties I,
LLC


Allegheny Income Properties I,
LLC


Allegheny Special Properties,
LLC


GLS Capital Services - Marlborough,
Inc.


SHF Corp.

















NOTE:
            All
      companies were incorporated in Virginia except for GLS Properties, LLC,
      Allegheny Commercial Properties I, LLC, Allegheny Income Properties I,
      LLC, and Allegheny Special Properties, LLC
  (Pennsylvania).
§ 67.503 Application for exchange or replacement of a Certificate of Documentation. ( a ) An application fee is charged for exchange or the simultaneous exchange and replacement of a Certificate of Documentation in accordance with subpart K of this part. Only a single application fee will be assessed when two or more reasons for exchange occur simultaneously. If application is made for any trade endorsement, the applicable fee under § 67.511 will be charged in addition to the application fee for the exchange or replacement.
( b ) The application fee for exchange or replacement does not apply to: ( 1 ) Endorsement of a change in the owner's address;
( 2 ) Exchange or replacement solely by reason of clerical error on the part of a documentation officer; or
( 3 ) Deletion of a vessel from documentation.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.4


                             Selected Information
                     Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 1997-B
                          Through December 31, 1997
                 -------------------------------------------



<TABLE>
<Caption

       
                    Class A-1            Class A-2           Class A-3          Class A-4       Class B        Class C
                      5.748%               5.95%               6.05%              6.15%           6.40%          6.65%
                  Asset Backed         Asset Backed        Asset Backed       Asset Backed    Asset Backed   Asset Backed     
                     Notes                Notes               Notes              Notes           Notes       Certificates   
                ----------------     ----------------     --------------     -------------   -------------   ------------
<S>             <C>                  <C>                  <C>                <C>             <C>


Principal
Paid            $ 118,892,785.00     $         -          $          -     $          -      $          -    $          -

Interest   
Paid            $   3,229,174.01     $   2,885,750.00     $  3,887,125.00  $  1,452,975.78   $  748,008.00   $ 211,977.06


Total Servicing Fee Paid:            $   2,787,064.94

</TABLE>
**OGC-91-5**                      Published: Jul 01, 1991. Publicly Released: Jul 01, 1991.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This document is superseded by Principles of Federal Appropriations Law Second and Third Editions. GAO published a second edition of Volume I of its Principles of Federal Appropriations Law (commonly referred to as the Red Book). It includes a discussion of the statutes and regulations governing appropriations matters as well as references to significant issues rendered by the Comptroller General and the courts. The third edition of Volume I of Principles of Federal Appropriations Law (GAO-04-261SP) was prepared in January 2004.

## Full Report

Full Report (515 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Budget and Spending

AppropriationsFederal fundsFederal lawAppropriations lawExpenditure of fundsGovernment employeesTaxesLobbyingReal propertyBudget formulation
The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United Sta tes District Court for 1 the Northern District of Iowa.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2471

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Craig Freisinger, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 2, 1998 Filed: October 15, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Craig Freisinger appeals the sentence the district court imposed on him afte r 1 revoking his supervised release, on the basis that his sentence exceeds the suggested range of imprisonment calculated by the court under U.S. S ENTENCING G UIDELINE S M ANUAL § 7B1.4(a), p.s. (1997).-2-

We reject Freisinger’s challenge. The Chapter 7 policy statements are “merely advisory,” the sentence d oes not exceed the limit imposed by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and t he district court properly considered Freisinger’s need for drug treatment. Se e Unites States v. Carr , 66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); United States v. Jones , 973 F.2d 605, 607 (8th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 1016.202 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in § 1016.105(e) of this part) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates' assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this part. The adjudicative officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, an applicant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes that there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may file a motion to withhold the information from public disclosure. The burden is on the moving party to justify the confidentiality of the information.
[46 FR 61660, Dec. 18, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 26380, June 23, 1989; 81 FR 8851, Feb. 23, 2016]
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have issued our report dated March 30, 2010 on the 2009 consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Inuvo, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Inuvo, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-143299, effective December 28, 2007, File No. 333-137141, effective September 25, 2006 and File No. 333-134823, effective August 1, 2006) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-137666, effective September 29, 2006, and File No. 333-169158, effective September 2, 2010).





March 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Kirkland Russ Murphy & Tapp, P.A./s/ Kirkland Russ Murphy & Tapp, P.A.Clearwater, Florida