alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 124 (Thursday, June 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Bankers Insurance 
Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------N
otice.

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 16 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: Bankers Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i> 33162). 
Business Address: P.O. Box 15707, St. Petersburg Florida 33733. Phone: 
(727) 823-4000 xtn 4908. Underwriting Limitation b/:$4,364,000. Surety 
Licenses c/: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IN, IA, KS, 
LA, MD, MS, MO, MT, NV, NC, OH, PA, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WV, WY. 
Incorporated in: Florida.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
HIghway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: June 20, 2007.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 07-3177 Filed 6-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending February 13, 2010

|Filer                                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------------ | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST NATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC | * 3A1       | First National Management Group, LLC, Greenwood Village, Colorado, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of at least 93 percent of the voting shares of Amoret Bancshares, Inc., parent of BC National Banks, both in Butler, Missouri.        | Newspaper:02/07/2010Federal Register:02/05/2010
|Newspaper:                           | 02/07/2010 
|Federal Register:                    | 02/05/2010 
|FIRST NORTON CORPORATION             | CIC         | Notification by Verlyn Joseph Herman, Jr., and Aaron Joseph Herman, both of Norton, Kansas, as members of a family group acting in concert, to retain control of First Norton Corporation, parent of First Security Bank & Trust Company, both of Norton, Kansas. | Newspaper:02/18/2010Federal Register:02/09/2010
|Newspaper:                           | 02/18/2010 
|Federal Register:                    | 02/09/2010 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 67.91 Passage of title pursuant to operation of State law. When title to a documented vessel has passed by operation of State law for reasons other than those specified in this subpart, such passage must be established by: ( a ) A copy of the statute permitting transfer of title to the vessel and setting forth procedures to be followed in disposing of the vessel;
( b ) An affidavit from the party acting against the vessel, setting forth the basis for selling the vessel, and the steps taken to comply with the requirements of the statute under which title passes;
( c ) Evidence of substantial compliance with the relevant statute(s); and
( d ) A bill of sale which meets the criteria for filing and recording set forth in subpart P of this part from the acting party as agent for the owner(s) of record.
Note:
State law authorizing a marina to dispose of abandoned vessels is an example of passage of title by operation of law contemplated by § 67.91.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending May 9, 2009

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CASTLE CREEK CAPITAL III LLC | * 3A3         | Castle Creek Capital Partners III LP, Castle Creek Capital III LLC, Eggemeyer Capital LLC, Ruh Capital LLC, and Legions IV Advisory Corp., all of Rancho Santa Fe, California, to acquire up to 19.9 percent of Guaranty Bancorp, and thereby indirectly its subsidiary, Guaranty Bank and Trust Company, both of Denver, Colorado. | Newspaper:06/11/2009Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | 06/11/2009   
|Federal Register:            | Not available
|SAEHAN BANCORP               | CIC           | Notice by Don Rhee, Bok Kyung Rhee, and the Rhee Family Trust, all of Los Angeles, California, to acquire additional voting shares of Saehan Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Saehan Bank, both of Los Angeles, California.                                                                      | Newspaper:05/19/2009Federal Register:05/08/2009   
|Newspaper:                   | 05/19/2009   
|Federal Register:            | 05/08/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-1694.

#### Pace v. Granecki.

Wood App. No. WD-97-053. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 1412, 701 N.E.2d 1021. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.

Resnick, J., not participating.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0342

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM007AD

747-21-2550 IN 01 --- 9/4/14

747-21-2544 --- 1/15/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1677

To waive the time limitation specified by law for the award of certain military

decorations in order to allow the posthumous award of the congressional

medal of honor to Doris Miller for actions while a member of the

Navy during World War II.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1995

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr.

MONTGOMERY, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

CLYBURN, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. JACKSON-LEE, Mr.

WILSON, Mr. LAUGHLIN, Mr. EVANS, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr.

HOUGHTON, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. TOWNS, Mr.

UNDERWOOD, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. TUCKER, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. METCALF, Mr. ENGEL, Mr.

CLAY, Mr. BONIOR, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. DELLUMS, and Mr.

HASTINGS of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To waive the time limitation specified by law for the award

of certain military decorations in order to allow the posthumous award of the congressional medal of honor to

Doris Miller for actions while a member of the Navy

during World War II.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the time limitations specified in section 6248(a) of
2

•HR 1677 IH

1 title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect

2 to the posthumous award of the congressional medal of

3 honor under section 6241 of such title to Doris Miller

4 (service number 356–12–35) for acts of heroism during

5 World War II while a member of the United States Navy.

Æ
§ 32.56-1 Application—T/ALL. ( a ) This subpart applies to all tankships that have a keel laying date on or after January 1, 1975.
( b ) Vessels meeting the structural fire protection requirements of SOLAS, Chapter II-2, Regulations 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11 (incorporated by reference, see § 32.01-1), may be considered equivalent to the provisions of this subpart.
[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3844, Jan. 26, 1976, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51198, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48248, July 22, 2016]
§ 560.1 Purpose; general provisions. ( a ) ( 1 ) It is the purpose of this part to enumerate certain conditions resulting from the action of a common carrier, acting alone or in concert with any person, or a foreign government, which unduly impair the access of a vessel documented under the laws of the United States whether liner, bulk, tramp or other vessel, (hereinafter “U.S. flag vessel”) to ocean trade between foreign ports, which includes intermodal movements, and to establish procedures by which the owner or operator of a U.S. flag vessel (hereinafter “U.S. flag carrier”) may petition the Federal Maritime Commission for relief under the authority of section 13(b)(6)of the Shipping Act of 1984 (“the Act”) (46 U.S.C. 41108(d)).
( 2 ) It is the further purpose of this part to indicate the general circumstances under which the authority granted to the Commission under section 13(b)(6) (46 U.S.C. 41108(d)) may be invoked, and the nature of the subsequent actions contemplated by the Commission.
( 3 ) This part also furthers the goals of the Act with respect to encouraging the development of an economically sound and efficient U.S. flag liner fleet as stated in section 2 of the Act (46 U.S.C. 40101).
( b ) ( 1 ) This part implements the statutory notice and hearing requirement and ensures that due process is afforded to all affected parties. At the same time, it allows for flexibility in structuring proceedings so that the Commission may act expeditiously whenever harm to a U.S. flag carrier resulting from impaired access to cross trades has been demonstrated or is imminent.
( 2 ) The provisions of part 502 of this chapter (Rules of Practice and Procedure) shall not apply to this part except for those provisions governing *ex parte* communications (§ 502.11 of this chapter) and service of documents and copies of documents (§§ 502.114(b) and 502.118 of this chapter), and except as the Commission may otherwise determine by order.
( c ) The condition of unduly impaired access will be found only where a U.S. flag carrier is commercially able to enter a trade in which its access is being unduly impaired, or is reasonably expected to be impaired, or where actual participation in a trade by a U.S. flag carrier is being restricted for reasons other than its commercial ability or competitiveness.
( d ) In examining conditions in a trade between foreign ports, and in considering appropriate action, the Commission will give due regard to U.S. maritime policy and U.S. Government shipping arrangements with other nations, as well as the degree of reciprocal access afforded in U.S. foreign trades to the carriers of the countries against whom Commission action is contemplated.
[49 FR 45406, Nov. 15, 1984, as amended at 55 FR 28400, July 11, 1990; 64 FR 8009, Feb. 18, 1999; 74 FR 50734, Oct. 1, 2009]
§ 52.05-45 Circumferential joints in pipes, tubes, and headers (modifies PW-41). ( a ) Circumferential welded joints of pipes, tubes and headers must be as required by PW-41 of Section I of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 52.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) (Modifies PW-41.1.) Circumferential welded joints in pipes, tubes, and headers of pipe material must be nondestructively examined as required by § 56.95-10 of this subchapter and PW-41 of Section I of the ASME BPVC.
( c ) (Modifies PW-41.5.) Butt-welded connections must be provided whenever radiography is required by § 56.95-10 of this subchapter for the piping system in which the connection is to be made. When radiography is not required, welded socket or sleeve type joints meeting the requirements of PW-41.5 of Section I of the ASME BPVC may be provided.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18815, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9434, Mar. 8, 1985; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65161, Oct. 31, 2008]
# C_2011179EN.01002101.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/21

---

Action brought on 31 March 2011 — AV v Commission

(Case F-4/11)

2011/C 179/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AV (Cadrezzate, Italy) (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of decisions to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union and not to grant him entitlement to the invalidity allowance.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Commission of 12 October 2010 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decisions of 12 April 2010 to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (CEOS) and 16 April 2010 not to grant him entitlement to an invalidity allowance; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Commission of 12 October 2010 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decisions of 12 April 2010 to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (CEOS) and 16 April 2010 not to grant him entitlement to an invalidity allowance;

| — | As necessary, annul the decisions of 12 April 2010 to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the CEOS and 16 April 2010 not to grant him entitlement to an invalidity allowance; |
| --- | --- |

—

As necessary, annul the decisions of 12 April 2010 to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the CEOS and 16 April 2010 not to grant him entitlement to an invalidity allowance;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
On appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed September 21,

reconsideration granted; opinion (136 Or App 239, 902 P2d 110) modified and adhered to as modified October 18, 1995,

petition for review denied January 23, 1996 (322 Or 489)

#### CRITERION INTERESTS, INC., an Oregon corporation, and the Conservation Fund, a Maryland non-profit corporation, *Respondents, v.*THE DESCHUTES CLUB, an Oregon non-profit corporation, *Appellant.*

(CC90-92; CA A81541)

903 P2d 421

Thomas H. Tongue, G. Kenneth Shiroishi, and Dunn, Carney, Allen, Higgins & Tongue, for motion.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Haselton, Judges.

DEITS, P. J.

*314DEITS, P. J.

Defendant moves for reconsideration of our opinion. 136 Or App 239, 902 P2d 110 (1995). Among its arguments is that our statement that “[defendant does not assert that the deed is not an integrated writing,” *id.*at 245 n 4, is factually inaccurate. The statement does not precisely capture our intended meaning. We correct it to read: “Defendant makes no argument that the deed is not an integrated writing, except an implicit argument that depends for its success on the correctness of other arguments that defendant makes.”

We have considered and reject the other contentions in the motion.

Reconsideration granted; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp
Realty Fund III Financial Statement for the nine months ended September 30, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         814,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               516,788
<PP&E>                                      30,001,842<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,952,198<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,413,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          677,686
<BONDS>                                     19,578,227<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (6,832,451)<F4>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,413,462
<SALES>                                      4,942,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,942,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,903,401<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,303,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (264,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (264,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (264,390)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes apartment complexes of $29,482,258 and deferred expenses of
$519,584.
<F2>Includes depreciation of $17,796,589 and amortization of deferred expenses
of $155,609.
<F3>Represents mortgage note payable.
<F4>Represents total equity of general partners ($304,418) and limited partners
($6,528,033).
<F5>Includes operating expenses of $2,149,610, real estate taxes of $383,335
and depreciation/amortization of $1,370,456.
<F6>Net loss allocated ($2,644) to general partners and ($261,746) to limited
partners for the nine months ended 9/30/96.  Average net loss ($10.05) per
unit for 25,000 units outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, March 10, 1995 (42), Para 42.18 Adjournment]
[Page 373]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.42.18  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. FOX, pursuant to the special order heretofore agreed 
to, at 2 o'clock and 35 minutes p.m., the House adjourned until 2 
o'clock p.m. on Monday, March 13, 1995.
```