alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 72.20-20 Sleeping accommodations. ( a ) Where practicable, each licensed officer shall be provided with a separate stateroom.
( b ) Sleeping accommodations for the crew must be divided into rooms, no one of which shall berth more than 4 persons.
( c ) Each room shall be of such size that there is at least 2.78 square meters (30 square feet) of deck area and a volume of at least 5.8 cubic meters (210 cubic feet) for each person accommodated. The clear head room shall be not less than 190 centimeters (75 inches). In measuring sleeping accommodations any furnishings contained therein for the use of the occupants are not to be deducted from the total volume or from the deck area.
( d ) Each person shall have a separate berth and not more than one berth may be placed above another. The berth must be composed of materials not likely to corrode. The overall size of a berth must not be less than 68 centimeters (27 inches) wide by 190 centimeters (75 inches) long, except by special permission of the Commandant. Where two tiers of berths are fitted, the bottom of the lower berth must not be less than 30 centimeters (12 inches) above the deck. The berths must not be obstructed by pipes, ventilating ducts, or other installations.
( e ) A locker must be provided for each person accommodated in a room.
NEW YORK COMMON PLEAS.

#### Margaret Krekeler agt. Henry W. Thaule *et al.*

*Special Term,*

*May,*1875.

Change of attorney&

An attorney cannot be changed without leave of the court or an order of a judge of the court.

He may be changed upon his own consent, but the consent must be filed on an order entered substituting in his place the new attorney, and notice of the order must be served upon the opposite party.

Daly, *C. J.*

An attorney cannot be changed without leave of the court or an order of a judge of the court (Mum*ford*agt. *Monay, Hop. R.,*369; *Anon., 7 Mad.,*50).

He may be changed upon his own consent, but the consent must be filed on an order entered substituting in his place the new attorney, and" notice of the order must be served upon the opposite party (Graham’s *Practice*[2d *ed.],*48; *Ryland*agt. *Noukes,*1 *Taunton,*342; *Robertson*agt. *McClellin,*1 *How. R.,*90; *Dalon*agt. *Lewis, 1 How.,*132).

Stemmier was the attorney for two of the defendants, > Thaule and Wessel. This consent did not authorize the entry of a rule substituting" Porter and Gould.

His consent was for the substitution of Porter and another. At all. events, it is at most doubtful if Porter and Gould were substituted, and the doubt' is one of weight in a judgment affecting real estate and the title acquired under it, for if not properly substituted their acts as attorneys are to be disregarded, as the opposite party is" bound to consider the former attorney as still employed (Jerome agt. *Bowan,*1 *Wend.,*393; *Graham’s Practice*[2d ed], 48).

*139It is doubtful, moreover, whether there has been any appearance for the other defendant. Porter and Gould served their notice of appearance as attorneys for the defendants, but there was no order of substitution as to the defendants who had appeared by Stemmier, and with respect to them all that appears to have been done was to file the consent. There was no service of appearance or retainer, under Rule 11, for the other defendant, nor any formal act which could be treated as a distinct and separate appearance for them *(Norton*agt. *Kayes,*4 *Denio,*245; *Cooley*agt. *Lawrence,*12 *How. P. R.,*176). The proper course would be to give leave to enter an order of substitution of Porter. Upon the consent filed the entry of an order upon Porter, consent substituting his firm, and the filing of a notice under Rule 11, and entry of an appearance by Porter and Gould for the defendants, which may be entered *nunc pro tunc*within five days after the entry of this order upon this motion, otherwise the motions have to be granted, with costs. If the rule is complied with no costs will be imposed on the defendants.
89-006

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–136

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 36, CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AUTHORIZING THE CONGRESS TO PROHIBIT

THE PHYSICAL DESECRATION OF THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12 (legislative day, JULY 11), 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 189]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 189, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint Resolution 36, Constitutional Amendment Authorizing the Congress to

Prohibit the Physical Desecration of the Flag of the United States,

under a modified closed rule. The rule provides two hours of debate

in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

The rule makes in order an amendment in the nature of a substitute, if offered by Representative Conyers or his designee, which

shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided between

the proponent and an opponent. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
§ 72.05-15 Ceilings, linings, trim, and decorations in accommodation spaces and safety areas. ( a ) Ceilings and linings and any furring incidental to their erection shall be of approved incombustible materials. Where such ceilings or linings are given credit for their insulating value in obtaining a bulkhead or deck classification they shall be of Class B-15 bulkhead panel material, and the construction shall be as required by § 72.05-10(j).
( b ) Bulkheads, linings, and ceilings may have a combustible veneer within a room not to exceed 2 ⁄ 28 of an inch in thickness. However, combustible veneers shall not be used in passageways or stairway enclosures, or in spaces specifically restricted by tables 72.05-10 (d) through (g).
( c ) The total volume of combustible face trim, moldings, and decorations, including veneers, in any compartment shall not exceed a volume equivalent to 1 ⁄ 10 inch veneer on the combined area of the walls of the compartment. Such trim, molding, or decorations shall not perform any structural function, and shall not be used in corridors or stairway enclosures.
( d ) Combustible veneers, trim, decorations, etc., shall not be used in or extend into hidden spaces such as behind linings or ceilings or in the matter of double bulkheads.
( e ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as prohibiting the covering of any surface with a reasonable number of coats of paint or with a Marine Finish meeting the requirements of subpart 164.012 of subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter. This includes corridors, stairway enclosures, and hidden spaces.
( f ) Partial bulkheads or decks used to subdivide a space for artistic treatment, privacy, etc., shall meet the requirements of Class C bulkheads.
§ 1152.10 System diagram map. ( a ) Each carrier shall prepare a diagram of its rail system on a map, designating all lines in its system by the categories established in paragraph (b) of this section. A Class III carrier shall either prepare the aforementioned map of its rail system or file only a narrative description of its lines that provides all of the information required in this subpart.
( b ) All lines in each carrier's rail system shall be separated into the following categories: ( 1 ) All lines or portions of lines which the carrier anticipates will be the subject of an abandonment or discontinuance application to be filed within the 3-year period following the date upon which the diagram or narrative, or any amended diagram or narrative, is filed with the Board;
( 2 ) All lines or portions of lines which are potentially subject to abandonment, defined as those which the carrier has under study and believes may be the subject of a future abandonment application because of either anticipated operating losses or excessive rehabilitation costs, as compared to potential revenues;
( 3 ) All lines or portions of lines for which an abandonment or discontinuance application is pending before the Board on the date upon which the diagram or narrative, or any amended diagram or narrative, is filed with the Board;
( 4 ) All lines or portions of lines which are being operated under the rail service continuation provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10904 (and former 49 U.S.C. 10905) on the date upon which the diagram or narrative, or any amended diagram or narrative, is filed with the Board; and
( 5 ) All other lines or portions of lines which the carrier owns and operates, directly or indirectly.
( c ) The system diagram map shall be color-coded to show the 5 categories of lines as follows: ( 1 ) Red shall designate those lines described in § 1152.10(b)(1);
( 2 ) Green shall designate those lines described in § 1152.10(b)(2);
( 3 ) Yellow shall designate those lines described in § 1152.10(b)(3);
( 4 ) Brown shall designate those lines described in § 1152.10(b)(4); and
( 5 ) Black or dark blue shall designate those lines described in § 1152.10(b)(5).
( d ) The system diagram map shall also identify, and shall be drawn to a scale sufficient to depict clearly, the location of: ( 1 ) All state boundary lines;
( 2 ) Boundaries of every county in which is situated a rail line owned or operated by the carrier which is listed in categories 1 thru 4 (§ 1152.10(b)(1) thru (4));
( 3 ) Every Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) any portion of which is located within 5 air miles of a rail line owned or operated by the carrier; and
( 4 ) Every city outside an SMSA which has a population of 5,000 or more persons (according to the latest published United States census reports) and which has any portion located within 5 air miles of a rail line owned or operated by the carrier. A series of interrelated maps may be used where the system serves a very large or congested area. An explanation of the interrelationship must be furnished.
#### John H. Miller, *Appellant, v.*Sarah A. Rodgers and others. —

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00172-CR

Richard Fredrick Denstitt

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

§

From the 97th District Court

of Montague County

(2011-0174M-CR)

July 2, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
§ 62.25-30 Environmental design standards. ( a ) All automation must be suitable for the marine environment and must be designed and constructed to operate indefinitely under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Ship motion and vibration described in Table 1 of section 4-9-9 of the ABS Marine Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference; see § 62.05-1); note that inclination requirements for fire and flooding safety systems are described in § 112.05-5(c) of this chapter.
( 2 ) Ambient air temperatures described in Table 1 of part 4-9-9/3 of the ABS Marine Vessel Rules.
( 3 ) Electrical voltage and frequency tolerances described in Table 1 of part 4-9-9 of the ABS Marine Vessel Rules.
( 4 ) Relative humidity of 0 to 95% at 45 °C.
( 5 ) Hydraulic and pneumatic pressure variations described in Table 1 of part 4-9-9 of the ABS Marine Vessel Rules. Note 1 to paragraph ( a
):
Considerations should include normal dynamic conditions that might exceed these values, such as switching, valve closure, power supply transfer, starting, and shutdown.
( b ) Low voltage electronics must be designed with due consideration for static discharge, electromagnetic interference, voltage transients, fungal growth, and contact corrosion.
[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50192, June 12, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Minority Programs Review Committee, MBRS Review Subcommittee B.                    

*Date:*                         July 16-17, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca H. Johnson, PhD, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2771,                         *Johnsonrh@nigms.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 19, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3123 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 515
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 515 appear at 67 FR 39860, June 11, 2002, and 70 FR 7669, Feb. 15, 2005.

§ 515.15 Denial of license. If the Commission determines, as a result of its investigation, that the applicant: ( a ) Does not possess the necessary experience or character to render intermediary services;
( b ) Has failed to respond to any lawful inquiry of the Commission; or
( c ) Has made any materially false or misleading statement to the Commission in connection with its application; then, a notice of intent to deny the application shall be sent to the applicant stating the reason(s) why the Commission intends to deny the application. The notice of intent to deny the application will provide, in detail, a statement of the facts supporting denial. An applicant may request a hearing on the proposed denial by submitting to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twenty (20) days of the date of the notice, a statement of reasons why the application should not be denied. Such hearing shall be provided pursuant to the procedures contained in § 515.17. Otherwise, the denial of the application will become effective and the applicant shall be so notified.
[64 FR 11171, Mar. 8, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 68734, Nov. 5, 2015]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, May 3, 1995 (61), Para 61.13 Private Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 634]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.61.13  private bills and resolutions

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       Ms. MOLINARI introduced a bill (H.R. 1577) for the relief 
     of the estate of Irwin Rutman; which was referred to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1772 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1772

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain interests 
 in the Waihee Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge 
                                Complex.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE OAHU 
              NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX.

    (a) Authority To Acquire.--The Secretary of the Interior may 
acquire, for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 
the area known as the Waihee Marsh, located on the northeast coast of 
the Island of Oahu, Hawaii, consisting of approximately 36 acres (as 
determined by the Secretary) along both sides of Kamehameha Highway.
    (b) Management of Acquired Interests.--Lands and interests acquired 
by the United States under this section shall be managed by the 
Secretary of the Interior as part of the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge 
Complex.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of S. Frederic Mills et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Mills Bros. *&*Company. In the Matter of the Accounting of Edward Harding, as Assignee of S. Frederic Mills et al., Respondent. Effingham Maynard et al., Appellants; Annie M. Mills, Respondent.

*Matter of Mills,*136 App. Div. 930, affirmed.

(Argued June 1, 1910;

decided June 17, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, entered January 21, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee appointed to take and state the accounts of the assignee herein.

*H. Snowden Marshall*and *Grenville T. Emmet*for appellants.

*William, Bell Wait, Jr.,*and *Henry Croftit White*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Hiscock and • Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 28, 1995 (51), Para 51.6 Messages from the President]
[Page 506]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.51.6  messages from the president

  Sundry messages in writing from the President of the United States 
were communicated to the House by Mr. Edwin Thomas, one of his 
secretaries.
```
Exhibit
4.57
 Volume I
(Nine Volumes in Total)




---



##### 



Contents
 PageVolume ISupplemental Agreement (I)
    
    


1-5Appendix I:
    
    Form of Tender
    
    

    6Volume II to VAppendix II:
    
    Correspondence delivered during
negotiation tendering for Mechanical and Electrical
Engineering (Details in Form of Tender)
    
    Stapled
separatelyVolume VI to IXAppendix III:
    
    Tendering and Bidding Documents for
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
    
    Stapled separatelyAppendix IV:
    
    Drawings Content
    
    Stapled separately
 
 i




---



##### 



Supplementary Agreement (I)
  Supplemental Agreement (I) of
 Main Contract
       (I)
    
    The Supplemental Agreement is affixed to the Main Contract entered into by and between the
Employer and the Main Contractor on 22nd January, 2008.
 (II)
    
    In respect of the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering of the Project which has been subject
to tendering and bidding, the Main Contractor has provided a unit price list for supply of
materials and a unit price list for installation (hereinafter referred to as Bills of
Quantities) to the Employer.
 (III)
    
    The Employer now intends to assign the Main Contractor to implement and complete the
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (hereinafter referred to as Supplemental Agreement
Work).
 
 1




---



##### 



Supplementary Agreement (I)
  (1)
    
    Total Price of Supplemental Agreement
  RMBParty A: Supply of materials
    
    
    72,338,000.00Party B: Mechanical and electrical installation
    
    
    8, 322,000.00Total
Price of Supplemental Agreement
    

RMB80,660,000.00
  (2)
    
    Scope of Works under the Supplemental Agreement Work
  (3)
    
    Construction Period
  (4)
    
    Insurance
  
 2




---



##### 



Supplementary Agreement (I)
 (5)
    
    Performance Bond
  (6)
    
    Compensation on Delay of the Construction Period
  (7)
    
    Warranty Fund and Warranty Fund Limit
  (8)
    
    Interpretation
  (9)
    
    Arbitration
  
 3




---



##### 



Supplementary Agreement (I)
 (10)
    
    Appendices
  Appendix (I):
    
    Form of TenderAppendix (II):
    
    Correspondence delivered during negotiation tendering for
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (Details in Form of Tender)Appendix (III):
    
    Tendering and Bidding Documents for Mechanical and Electrical
EngineeringAppendix (IV):
    
    Drawings Content
 
 4




---



##### 



Supplementary Agreement (I)
   Employer:
    
    Zastron Precision Flex (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.By Statutory
    
    
    
    Seal:Representative
    

(Signature)or AuthorizedRepresentative
    
    Date: 10th July, 2008(Seal ofBy the Witness
    
    
    
    Zastron Precision Flex (Wuxi)
Co., Ltd.)Date:               , 2008Main Contractor:
    
    Yixing Building Engineering & Installation Co., Ltd.By Statutory
    
    
    
    Seal:Representative
    

(Signature)or AuthorizedRepresentative
    
    Date: 10th July, 2008(Seal ofBy the Witness
    
    
    
    Yixing Building Engineering &(Signature)
    
    Installation Co., Ltd.)Date: 10th July, 2008
 
 5
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ LAGALE BROWN ROSTICK, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1599

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:23

- cv

- 00144

- DAT

, Judge David A. Tapp.

______________________
O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the ti me permitted by the rules, it is Case: 23-1599 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 09/19/2023R OSTICK V

. US 2

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

September 19, 2023 Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 19, 2023 Case: 23-1599 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 09/19/2023
#### Sarah F. Hunter, *Administratrix, Respondent, v.*Joseph J. Little and *another, Appellants.*

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.