alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2980

_____________________________

JOHN BARNER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

August 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., and GAY, SHONNA YOUNG,

ASSOCIATE JUDGE, concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

John Barner, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 97.25-1 Improper use prohibited. ( a ) No person shall flash or cause to be flashed the rays of a searchlight or other blinding light onto the bridge or into the pilothouse of any vessel under way.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 21, 2012

|Filer                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BISCAYNE BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Prior change in control notice filed by George Michael Schweitzer, Miami, Florida, to acquire up to 1.26 percent of the outstanding shares of Biscayne Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, Biscayne Bank, both of Coconut Grove, Florida. Total pro forma ownership will equal 12.85 percent. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/25/2012
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 01/25/2012   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending September 3, 2011

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                    | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|ANSON B&TC, WADESBORO, NORTH CAROLINA     | 802174  | 05/09/2011 | 08/17/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|BANK OF STANLY, ALBEMARLE, NORTH CAROLINA | 590220  | 05/09/2011 | 08/18/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|CFG CMNTY BK, TOWSON, MARYLAND            | 2471239 | 05/16/2011 | 08/17/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|FOUR OAKS B&TC, FOUR OAKS, NORTH CAROLINA | 292524  | 04/25/2011 | 08/04/2011     | S         | Large Bank 
|JOHN MARSHALL BK, FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA  | 3419416 | 04/25/2011 | 08/03/2011     | S         | Small Bank 
|RBC BK USA, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA       | 1494240 | 06/21/2010 | 08/08/2011     | S         | Large Bank 
|VALLEY BK, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA              | 2303086 | 05/02/2011 | 08/18/2011     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Edward Harbison *v.*William Peters.—

Motion denied. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2018

No. 04

- 16

- 00721

- CV

402 LONE STAR PROPERTY, LLC and Craig Otto

,

Appellants

v.

Barry L. BRADFORD

, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08653

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellants ’ motion for rehearing and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of February, 2 018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
§ 1104.14 Protective orders to maintain confidentiality. ( a ) *Segregation of confidential material.* A party submitting materials which it believes are entitled to be kept confidential and not made part of the public docket should submit these materials as a separate package, clearly marked on the outside “Confidential materials subject to a request for a protective order.” When confidential documents are filed, redacted versions must also be filed.
( b ) *Requests for protective orders.* A request that materials submitted to the Board be kept confidential should be submitted as a separate pleading and clearly headed “Motion for protective order.”
( c ) *Requests for protective orders in stand-alone cost and simplified standards cases.* A motion for protective order in stand-alone cost and simplified standards cases shall specify that evidentiary submissions will designate confidential material within single braces (*i.e.,* {X}), highly confidential material within double braces (*i.e.,* {{Y}}), and sensitive security information within triple braces (*i.e.,* {{{Z}}}). In stand-alone cost cases, the motion for protective order shall be filed together with the notice pursuant to 49 CFR 1111.1.
[48 FR 44827, Sept. 30, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 52711, Oct. 8, 1996; 81 FR 8853, Feb. 23, 2016; 82 FR 57378, Dec. 5, 2017]
#### The State ex rel. Kriner, Appellant, *v.*LTV Steel Company et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Kriner v. LTV Steel Co.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 223.]

(No. 97-1183

Submitted October 27, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A.,*and *Rachel B. Jaffy,*for appellant.

*Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman, L.P.A.,*and *Joseph R. Young, Jr.,*for appellee LTV Steel Co.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Michael A. Vanderhorst,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J.,.dissents.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 28, 1995 (51), Para 51.31 Leave of Absence]
[Page 510]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.51.31  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to Mr. UNDERWOOD, 
for today and balance of the week.
  And then,
```
§ 1017.10 Procedures for administrative offset. ( a ) Debts will be collected in one lump sum where possible. If the employee is financially unable to pay in one lump sum, collection shall be made in installments.
( b ) Debts shall be collected by deduction at officially established pay intervals from an employee's current pay account, unless alternative arrangements for repayment are made.
( c ) Installment deductions will be made over a period not greater than the anticipated period of employment. The size of installment deductions must bear a reasonable relationship to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. The deduction for the pay intervals for any period shall not exceed 15 percent of disposable pay, unless the employee has agreed in writing to a deduction of a greater amount.
( d ) Unliquidated debts may be offset against any financial payment due to a separated employee (including, but not limited to, final salary payment or lump-sum payment for leave).
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1778

To prohibit the Department of the Interior from expending any funds for

a mid-Atlantic coast offshore oil and gas lease sale.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1995

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. ROSE,

Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. TORRICELLI, Ms. DELAURO, and

Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To prohibit the Department of the Interior from expending

any funds for a mid-Atlantic coast offshore oil and gas

lease sale.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS

4 FOR MID-ATLANTIC OIL AND GAS LEASE

5 SALE.

6 The Secretary of the Interior shall not expend any

7 funds for the preparation of, or conduct of, preleasing and

8 leasing activities (including calls for information, tract se9 lection, notices of sale, receipt of bids, and award of
2

•HR 1778 IH

1 leases) with respect to an oil and gas lease sale on any

2 lands of the outer Continental Shelf between the seaward

3 boundary between the States of Connecticut and Rhode

4 Island and the seaward boundary between the States of

5 North Carolina and South Carolina.

Æ
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  1.
	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Wilson Holdings, Inc.;2.
	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
	The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and5.
	The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 31, 2006 /s/ Daniel AllenDaniel AllenVice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
!

 "#$% & '(   &&!

))	*+ ,-!. /0""1   ( 

! -  222%3456%789:7;<8%=:> ( '!'

?@#A"/AB# &

& C@#A"/A ?







 7=78<1,"B"#



D4EF?:G<:

9H: 6E3?:G<:

"0BB:;<I258<5;G4=I2EJ,74<50B

:7<IK45D6,-49I4=EG/0BL



G5@MNOPQRSSTUVSSWOXORYZW[\XZPR]^_`XZa

 !E85:%#A9>A##LBL



5E;-;%?:G<:,



IE>5b55G9:G<E9<56bJc76=5;E4G2I:d;584656:>5;<I5Eb:>5;5K5;5G9569E85%



c76=5;E4G4GK:;35635<IE<4<IE8b55Gb;:7=I<<:I48E<<5G<4:G<IE<2I4D5I5d;584656

:>5;<I59E85,I5:2G568<:9e4G DD8<E<5!:;d%48:2G5;8I4d:K8<:9eG54<I5;EKK59<56G:;

43dE9<56I48659484:G8:G<I59E85%:25>5;,IE6I5eG:2G:KI48:2G5;8I4d:K8<:9e4G<I5

9:;d:;E<4:GE<<I5<435,4<2:7D6IE>5;5f74;56;5978ED7G65;<I5!:65:K!:G679<K:;<I5G4<56

<E<58c76=58,EG6<I78,c76=5;E4G64;59<56<IE<G:<4KJ<I5dE;<458:K<I548875%



 6>48:;Jd4G4:GL#,K;:3<I5c76494ED!:GK5;5G95!:658:K!:G679<!:334<<55,

d;:>4658<I5K:DD:24G==746EG95K:;E66;5884G=648f7ED4K49E<4:G<IE<48G:<6489:>5;567G<4DEK<5;

Eg76=5IE8dE;<494dE<564GE9E85@



h ig76=58I:7D66489D:85<:<I5dE;<458<I5KE9<8b5E;4G=:G648f7ED4K49E<4:GE8

8::GE8<I:85KE9<8E;5D5E;G565>5G<I:7=I<IE<3EJ:997;EK<5;5G<;J:KE

659484:G%I5dE;<4583EJ<I5G65<5;34G52IE<;5D45K<I5J3EJ855eEG6E9:7;<

j24<I:7<<I5648f7ED4K456g76=5k24DD659465<I5D5=ED9:G85f75G95,4KEGJ,E;484G=

K;:3<I5dE;<494dE<4:G:K<I5648f7ED4K456g76=54G<I55G<5;56659484:G%



 D<I:7=I 6>48:;Jd4G4:GL#9:G<53dDE<58648f7ED4K49E<4:GEK<5;E!:7;<:K dd5ED8

:;EDE;=735G<,<I5!:334<<555ldDE4G56mh8i434DE;9:G8465;E<4:G2:7D6EddDJ2I5GEg76=35G<

2E85G<5;564GE648<;49<9:7;<bJEg76=5EG64<48DE<5;D5E;G56<IE<<I5g76=52E8648f7ED4K456%n

Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 22, PageID.184 Filed 08/06/21 Page 1 of 2
	





	
 

		 ! "#$%&##		

'	"	(" 	#&	&##)	#	*+		

		 "(( !,	"-(
!&	&##

		(./)		#	  #	0#	+	

	(		#	%!	(	+!		#	%+

+"1
2"	"	(	+##%	%"3 	+

(( ./

0#"

4*/5		6

!	

Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 22, PageID.185 Filed 08/06/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 505.4 Notification procedures. Before collecting any debt through administrative offset, a notice of intent to offset shall be sent to the debtor by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the most current address that is available to the Commission. The notice shall provide: ( a ) A description of the nature and amount of the debt and the intention of the Commission to collect the debt through administrative offset;
( b ) An opportunity to inspect and copy the records of the Commission with respect to the debt;
( c ) An opportunity for review within the Commission of the determination of the Commission with respect to the debt; and
( d ) An opportunity to enter into a written agreement for the repayment of the amount of the debt.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ALLEN FEINGOLD,

Petitioner

v.

JOSEPH AVERSA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 331 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 4, 2010

|Filer             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST BANK CORP   | * 3A3       | First Bank Corp, Fort Smith, Arkansas, to acquire 9.99 percent of Bankshares of Fayetteville, Inc., Fayetteville, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of Fayetteville, Fayetteville, Arkansas. | Newspaper:09/25/2010Federal Register:10/01/2010
|Newspaper:        | 09/25/2010 
|Federal Register: | 10/01/2010 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending December 12, 2009

----

EnforcementFirst Mariner Bancorp, Baltimore, Maryland  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.					-Announced, December 11, 2009 					Pierce County Bancorp, Tacoma, Washington, and Pierce Commercial Bank  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order by the Board and the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions.					-Announced, December 7, 2009 					River Valley Bancorp, Inc., Davenport, Iowa  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.					-Announced, December 8, 2009 					

FormsForms  -- initial Board review to implement the Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms (FR 2034).					-Proposed, December 8, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: December 17, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JESUS ANGEL LOPEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 50150

D.C. No. 8:18

- cr

- 00033

- JLS

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2020 * *

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Angel Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty

- plea conviction s and aggregate 152

- month sentence for possession with

intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(i);

posse ssion of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime , in violation of 18

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 50150

U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i); and being a felon in possession of a firearm and

ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

. Pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

We have provided Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answ ering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 535.901 Failure to file.

Any person operating under an agreement, involving activities subject to the Act pursuant to sections 4 and 5(a) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 40301(a)-(c) and 40302) and this part and not exempted pursuant to section 16 of the Act (46 U.S.C. 40103) or excluded from filing by the Act, that has not been filed and that has not become effective pursuant to the Act and this part is in violation of the Act and this part and is subject to the civil penalties set forth in section 13(a) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 41107).

[69 FR 64414, Nov. 4, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 50729, Oct. 1, 2009]