alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 31336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Alcohol, Puberty, and Adolescent 
Brain Development.
    Date: July 24, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#177575626d7664577a767e7b39797e7f39707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1d1d0a051e0c3f121e16135111161751181009">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2798 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00428

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22

- 6164

- 367

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Cur iam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### M.S., A 

### C HILD2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On February 26, 2024, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as
the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of pro secution unless , within ten days, appellant filed with

the court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay a l l costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam

Delivered : March 21, 2024
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC15

- 563

____________

JONATHAN LENEIL GODWIN
,

Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent.

[June 9, 2016]

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Second

District Court of Appeal in Godwin v. State , 160 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015),

based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After

further consideration, we conclude t hat jurisdiction was improvidently granted.

Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING W ILL BE ALLOWED.- 2

-

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal

- Direct
Conflict of Decisions

Second District

- Case No. 2D13

- 2117

( Hillsborough County)

Jorge A

. Pérez Santiago of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Miami, Flo rida ; and Peter D. Webster of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida; John M. K lawikofsky, Bureau Chief, Jason Michael Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Peter N. Koclanes, A ssistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,

for Respondent
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE
                             CAPITAL RE CORPORATION
                         1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS, Capital Re Corporation (the "Corporation") maintains the Capital
Re Corporation 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), originally
effective as of February 26, 1997;

     WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to allow the grant of
awards relating to shares available for grant under the 1992 Stock Option Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

I.   The Section 4 is amended in its entirety to read as follows, effective as
of March 10, 1999:

     The stock that may be issued pursuant to Options granted under the Plan
shall be Stock, which shares may be treasury shares or authorized but unissued
shares. The number of shares of Stock that may be issued pursuant to Options
granted under the Plan shall not exceed in the aggregate (i) 2,000,000 shares of
Stock, which number of shares is subject to adjustment as provided in Section 19
hereof, (ii) any shares of Stock available for future awards under the 1992
Stock Option Plan as of the Effective Date, and (iii) any shares of Stock that
are represented by awards granted under the 1992 Stock Plan, or other option
plan of the Corporation, which are forfeited, expire or are canceled without
delivery of shares of Stock or which result in the forfeiture of shares of Stock
back to the Company. If any Option expires, terminates or is terminated for any
reason prior to exercise in full, the shares of Stock that were subject to the
unexercised portion of such Option shall be available for future Options granted
under the Plan.

                                     * * * *

     In all respects not amended, the Plan is confirmed and ratified.

     In Witness Whereof, Whereof the Corporation has caused this Amendment to be
executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer on this 10th day of March
1999.

                                        CAPITAL RE CORPORATION

                                        By:   /s/ Alan S. Roseman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                        Title: EVP General Counsel & Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      30,695,937
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         544,989
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            14,700,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 52,684,570
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      40,292,992
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        39,614,937
<LOANS>                                     94,105,992
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,242,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             239,705,614
<DEPOSITS>                                 217,348,691
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,272,633
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,895,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,300
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,177,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             239,705,614
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,262,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,491,641
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               265,009
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,019,044
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             801,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             920,810
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,098,234
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,144,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                321,635
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     321,635
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   189,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.25
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,220,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   361,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               283,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,253,031
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  146,611
<RECOVERIES>                                    75,715
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,242,135
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,021,270
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        220,865
        

</TABLE>
#### § 78.95-1 General.

A qualified person in charge of a transfer of liquid cargo in bulk shall be designated in accordance with subpart C of 33 CFR part 155.

[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17157, Apr. 4, 1995]
§ 64.2 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters at: Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593-7509; phone (202) 372-1375; email *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov*. The material may be obtained from: *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),* Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990; 800-843-2763; *CustomerCare@asme.org*; *www.asme.org*. ( a ) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1, Pressure Vessels, 1989, with Addenda issued December 31, 1989 (“Section VIII of the ASME BPVC”); IBR approved for §§ 64.5(d); 64.11(a); 64.13; 64.21; 64.25(b); 64.31.
( b ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50199, June 12, 2024]
§ 90.10-40 Offshore supply vessels. ( a ) An offshore supply vessel is a vessel that is propelled by machinery other than steam, that is of 15 gross tons or more, and that regularly carries goods, supplies or equipment in support of exploration, exploitation, or production of offshore mineral or energy resources.
( b ) An existing offshore supply vessel is one that is— ( 1 ) Of at least 15 GRT but less than 500 GRT (6,000 GT ITC if GRT is not assigned) as defined in § 125.160 of this chapter, contracted for, or the keel of which was laid, before March 15, 1996; or
( 2 ) Of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) as defined in § 125.160 of this chapter, contracted for, or the keel of which was laid, before August 18, 2014.
( c ) A new offshore supply vessel is one— ( 1 ) That is of at least 15 GRT but less than 500 GRT (6,000 GT ITC if GRT is not assigned) as defined in § 125.160 of this chapter, and was contracted for, or the keel of which was laid, on or after March 15, 1996;
( 2 ) That is of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) as defined in § 125.160 of this chapter, and was contracted for, or the keel of which was laid, on or after August 18, 2014; or
( 3 ) That underwent a major conversion initiated on or after March 15, 1996.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49321, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48925, Aug. 18, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# Time and Date:

9 a.m. (CST), January 25, 2007. Fogelman Conference Center, University of Memphis, 330 DeLoach Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38152. 

# Status:

Open. 

## Agenda 

### Old Business 

Approval of minutes of November 30, 2006, Board Meeting. 

### New Business

1. President's Report. 

2. Chairman's Report. 

A. Board Committee membership appointments. 

3. Report of the Finance, Strategy, and Rates Committee. 

A. Two-Part Real Time Pricing Arrangements for a directly served customer. 

4. Report of the Operations, Environment, and Safety Committee. 

A. TVA Board Practice on delegation of authority on capital expenditures. 

B. TVA Board Practice on approval of fuels, power trading, and related contracts. 

5. Report of the Audit and Ethics Committee. 

6. Report of the Corporate Governance Committee. 

A. Appointment of assistant secretaries. 

7. Information Item. 

A. Board approved framework for settlement of Johns Manville class action lawsuit, which is subject to court approval. 

# For more information:

Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's Washington Office (202) 898-2999. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902. 

January 18, 2007. 

Maureen H. Dunn, 

General Counsel and Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 07-286 Filed 1-19-07; 12:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
Editorial Note on Part 98
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 98.25-10 Design and construction of cargo tanks. ( a ) The cargo tanks shall meet the requirements for Class I, I-L, II, or II-L welded pressure vessels and shall be fabricated, inspected, and tested in accordance with the applicable requirements of part 54 of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) Unlagged cargo tanks subject to atmospheric temperatures shall be designed for a pressure of not less than 250 pounds per square inch gage.
( c ) Where unrefrigerated cargo tanks are lagged as required by §§ 98.25-30 and 98.25-60, the tanks shall be designed for a pressure of not less than 215 pounds per square inch gage.
( d ) Refrigerated cargo tanks, in which the temperature of the liquid ammonia is maintained below the normal atmospheric temperatures, shall be designed for a pressure of not less than the vapor pressure corresponding to the temperature of the liquid at which the system is to be maintained, plus 25 pounds per square inch gage.
( e ) Each tank shall be provided with not less than a 15′′ × 18′′ diameter manhole, fitted with a cover located above the maximum liquid level and as close as possible to the top of the tank. Where access trunks are fitted to tanks, the diameter of the trunks shall be not less than 30 inches.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 17022, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18902, Dec. 18, 1968]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1607 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1607

  To provide for the conveyance of El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, 
selected for closure under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act 
                 of 1990, to Orange County, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1995

  Mr. Royce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, 
selected for closure under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act 
                 of 1990, to Orange County, California.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, EL TORO MARINE CORPS AIR STATION, ORANGE 
              COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--Notwithstanding section 2905 of the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX 
of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) governing the disposal of 
property at military installations to be closed under that Act, the 
Secretary of Defense shall convey to Orange County, California, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real 
property and facilities of El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, 
California.
    (b) Time for Conveyance.--The Secretary shall complete the 
conveyance required by subsection (a) not later than the date of the 
closure of El Toro Marine Corps Air Station.
    (c) Consideration.--The conveyance required by subsection (a) shall 
be made without consideration.
    (d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall 
be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of 
the survey shall be borne by the Secretary.
    (e) Environmental Restoration.--Section 120(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 
U.S.C. 9620(h)) shall apply to the conveyance of property under 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 98

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 98 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49232, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 98.30-29 Piping incompatible products.

No person may pipe a portable tank or IBC with another tank that contains a chemically incompatible product.

[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22954, June 25, 1974, as amended by USCG-2011-0088, 78 FR 54787, Sept. 6, 2013]
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE DIS TRICT OF COLUM BIA

ELE CTRONIC F RONTIER F OUNDATION, P laintif f, v. Civil Action No. 07-0656 (JD B) UNITED STAT ES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendan t.
ORDER Be fore the Court is [ 40] t he De partment of Justice' s motion for summary judgme nt. The Electronic Fr ontier F oundation has indicate d that it does not oppose that motion, with one exception. See Pl.'s Mem. in Supp. of Cross-Motion for Summ. J . (" Pl.'s Mem." ) [Docket Entry 43], at 1. That exception is t he De partment' s "c ontinued withholding of Intellige nce O versig ht Boa rd Case Numbers" under e x emption two of the F ree dom of Information Ac t, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)( 2). I d. The F oundation cross-move s for pa rtial summary

judgme nt on that issue. But the Depa rtment is not withholdi ng Intellige nce O versig ht Boa rd Case Numbers under

exemption two. Indeed, in its own motion for summary judgme nt, the Depa

rtment asser

ted that it was no longe r withholding the Case Number s at all, and would be rele asing that information to the Foundation. See Def

.' s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J . [Docket Entry 40], at 17 n.12. And 1
In its cross-motion for summary judgme nt, the Foundation indicated that it believed the 1 Depa rtment of Just ice' s decision to rele ase the Intellige nce O versig ht Boa rd Case Numbers extended to all documents, not only those " contained in the r epre sentative sample of documents desig nated by

the par ties." Pl.' s Mem. at 4. The D epar tment concur

red in this assessment. See Def .' s Reply in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J . [Docket Entry 45], at 2; see also Bonne r v. De p' t of State, 928 F.2d 1148, 1152 ( D.C. Cir. 1991) (docume nts in a repr esentative sample " count notthe Depa

rtment has now done so. See De f.' s Status R eport [Docket Entry 49], at 1 ("DO J here by repor ts that it has completed this review a nd rele ased to plaintiff Ele ctronic F rontier F oundation . . . [I ntellige nce O versig ht Boa rd] Case Numbers . . . ." ). B eca use the De partment voluntarily ag ree d to relea se the Case Numbers be fore the Founda tion filed its cross-motion for par tial summary judgme nt reque sting the same ac tion, there is no basis on which the grant the Foundation's c ross-motion. Accor dingly , it is hereby ORDERED that the Depa rtment of Just ice' s motion for summary judgme nt is GR ANTED ; it is further ORDERED that the Elec tronic F rontier F oundation' s cross-motion for pa rtial summary judgme nt is DENIED as m oot ; and it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSE D
. SO ORDERED. /s/ J ohn D. B ates J OHN D. B ATES United States District J udg e Dated: May

25, 2010

simply for themse lves, but for pre sumably simil ar non- sample docume nts stil l withheld")
. -2-