alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Michigan

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:15−cv−10261−JCO−MKM

Hon. John Corbett O'Meara

Melissa Lebowitz,

Defendant.

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Melissa Lebowitz

 A lawsuit has been filed against you.

 Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) - or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) - you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney,

whose name and address are:

Timothy J. Frost

20300 W. 12 Mile Road

Suite 201

Southfield, MI

48076

If you fail to respond, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You

also must file your answer or motion with the court.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT By: s/ D. Worth 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Date of Issuance: January 23, 2015

Case 5:15-cv-10261-JCO-MKM ECF No. 2, PageID.7 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

Summons and Complaint Return of Service

Case No. 5:15−cv−10261−JCO−MKM

Hon. John Corbett O'Meara

A copy of the Summons and Complaint has been served in the manner indicated below:

Name of Defendant Served: Melissa Lebowitz

Date of Service:

Method of Service

Personally served at this address:

Left copies at defendant's usual place of abode with (name of person):

Other (specify):

Returned unexecuted (reason):

Service Fees: Travel $ Service $ Total $ 

Declaration of Server

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Return of Service is true and correct.

Name of Server:

Signature of Server:

Date:

Server's Address:

Case 5:15-cv-10261-JCO-MKM ECF No. 2, PageID.8 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2
§ 58.20-25 Tests. ( a ) All pressure vessels, compressors, piping, and direct expansion cooling coils must be leak tested after installation to their design pressures, hydrostatically or pneumatically.
( b ) No pneumatic tests in refrigeration systems aboard ships must be made at pressures exceeding the design pressure of the part of the system being tested. Pneumatic tests may be made with the refrigerant in the system. If the refrigerant has been removed, oil-pumped dry nitrogen or bone-dry carbon dioxide with a detectable amount of the refrigerant added should be used as a testing medium. (Carbon dioxide should not be used to leak test an ammonia system.) In no case should air, oxygen, any flammable gas or any flammable mixture of gases be used for testing.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 210 ) ll-K-(I)-2 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55 AM Sheet 210 of 325P. 2 

# h\r,g "-K-CI)-2 3 DISCUSSIO N

PAPE RO N ANALYTICA L CAPABILITIE S T O EVALUAT E TH E INDUSTRIAL BOILE RNSPS . EEA , Inc . Februar y 1 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-2 3
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
The Board of Directors
FirstCity Financial Corporation:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation of our report dated February 13,
1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of FirstCity Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1995 annual report on
Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation.
 
                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Ft. Worth, Texas
March 25, 1996
 
                                       64
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 11, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 64.87 Purpose.

Each cargo-handling system required to satisfy § 98.30-25 or § 98.33-13 of this chapter must meet the requirements of this subpart.

[CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37410, Sept. 11, 1990]
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                  TO THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION,
                     OF LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

      Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), does hereby amend the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation.

     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies  that this  amendment  to the  Restated
Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation  has been  duly  adopted  in
accordance with Section 242 of the DGCL.

     FIRST:  That the Restated  Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation
be amended as follows:

     "FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is Safety-Kleen Corp."

     SECOND:  That such amendment has been duly adopted by the affirmative  vote
of the holders of a majority of the stock  entitled to vote in  accordance  with
the  provisions  of Section 242 of the General  Corporation  Law of the State of
Delaware.

     THIRD:  That the  effective  time of this  Certificate  of Amendment to the
Restated  Certificate of Incorporation  shall be at the close of business on the
date filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     THE  UNDERSIGNED,  being the President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Corporation,   for  the  purpose  of  amending  the  Restated   Certificate   of
Incorporation of the Corporation  pursuant to the DGCL, does make this amendment
to  the  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of  the  Corporation,  hereby
declaring  and  certifying  that  this is my act and deed and the  facts  herein
stated are true, and accordingly I have hereunto set my hand as of this 25th day
of November, 1998.

                                      LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

                                      By:  /s/ Kenneth W. Winger
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth W. Winger
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

/s/ Henry H. Taylor
-------------------
Henry H. Taylor
Secretary


                                       1
§ 69.209 Gross and net register tonnages. ( a ) *Gross register tonnage.* ( 1 ) Except as in paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(5) of this section, the gross register tonnage of a vessel designed for sailing is one-half of the product of its overall length, overall breadth, and overall depth (LBD) divided by one hundred (i.e., 0.50 LBD/100), and the gross register tonnage of a vessel not designed for sailing is 0.67 LBD/100.
( 2 ) The gross tonnage of a vessel with a hull that approximates in shape a rectangular geometric solid (barge-shape) is 0.84 LBD/100.
( 3 ) The gross tonnage of a multi-hull vessel is the sum of all the hulls as calculated under this section.
( 4 ) If the volume of the principal deck structure of a vessel is as large as, or larger than, the volume of the vessel's hull, the volume of the principal deck structure in tons of 100 cubic feet is added to the tonnage of the hull to establish the vessel's gross tonnage. The volume of the principal deck structure of a vessel is determined by the product of its average dimensions.
( 5 ) If the overall depth of a vessel designed for sailing includes the keel, only 75 percent of that depth is used for gross tonnage calculations.
( b ) *Net register tonnage.* ( 1 ) For a vessel having propelling machinery in its hull— ( i ) The net register tonnage is 90 percent of its gross register tonnage, if it is a vessel designed for sailing; or
( ii ) The net register tonnage is 80 percent of its gross register tonnage, if it is not a vessel designed for sailing.
( 2 ) For a vessel having no propelling machinery in its hull, the net register tonnage is the same as its gross register tonnage.
( c ) *Certification of measurement.* For a vessel that is documented as a vessel of the United States under part 67 of this chapter, the vessel's Certificate of Documentation serves as evidence of measurement under this subpart. For all other vessels, a completed Application for Simplified Measurement (form CG-5397) serves as evidence of the tonnage measurement under this part.
[CGD 87-015b, 54 FR 37657, Sept. 12, 1989, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2011-0522, 81 FR 18734, Mar. 31, 2016]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63304

)

Under Contract No. FA4855-18-D-0002

 T.O. FA4855-20-F-0013

)

)

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: John C. Dulske, Esq.

Bonnie Kirkland, Esq.

Carrie Gorner, Esq.

 Dykema Gossett PLLC

 San Antonio, TX

APPEARANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

 Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board’s 

docket with prejudice.

Dated: June 24, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63304, Appeal of Diversified 

Maintenance Systems, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 24, 2022 

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 388.3 Application and fee. ( a ) An owner of a vessel may choose either of two methods to apply for an administrative waiver of the coastwise trade laws of the United States for an eligible vessel to carry no more than twelve passengers for hire. ( 1 ) The application form contained on MARAD's Web site at *http://www.marad.dot.gov* may be submitted electronically with credit card or Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) payment of the $500 application fee.
( 2 ) Alternatively, applicants may send written applications to Small Passenger Vessel Waiver Applications, Office of Cargo Preference, MAR-730, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590. Written applications need not be in any particular format, but must be signed, be accompanied by a check made out to the order of “Maritime Administration,” and contain the following information: ( i ) Name of vessel and owner for which waiver is requested and the vessel's official number.
( ii ) Size, capacity and tonnage of vessel (state whether tonnage is measured pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 14502, or otherwise, and if otherwise, how measured).
( iii ) Intended use for vessel, including geographic region of intended operation and trade.
( iv ) Date and place of construction and (if applicable) rebuilding. (If applicant is unable to document the origin of the vessel, foreign construction will be assumed).
( v ) Name, address, and telephone number of the vessel owner.
( vi ) A statement on the impact this waiver will have on other commercial passenger vessel operators, including a statement describing the operations of existing operators.
( vii ) A statement on the impact this waiver will have on U.S. shipyards.
( viii ) A statement that the applicant represents that the foregoing information is true to the best of the applicant's knowledge.
( b ) MARAD may ask additional questions of the applicant as part of the application review.
[69 FR 51772, Aug. 23, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 66797, Nov. 3, 2005; 75 FR 28206, May 20, 2010]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 65 4 . TONY L. W ARE et a l . v . C.R. ASSET GROUP, LLC.

Th e cas e ori g i n at ed as a d i s p o s s es s o ry act i o n i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

, b u t was l at er

t ran s ferred t o s u p eri o r co u rt b ecau s e o f t h e d efen d an t s To n y L. W are an d Reg i n al d

W are’ s i n cl u s i o n o f a co un t ercl ai m fo r eq u i t ab le rel i ef. Th e t ri al co u rt s u bs eq u en t l y

g ran t ed t h e p l a i n t i ff C.R. As s et Gro u p , LLC a w ri t o f po s s es s i o n ag ai n s t t h e

d efen d an t s fo r fai l i n g t o p ay ren t i n t o t h e reg i st ry

. Th e t ri al co u rt

, h o wev er, d i d n ot

ru l e o n t h e p art i es ’ rem ai n i ng cl ai m s

. Th e d efen d an ts t h e n f il ed th is d i rect ap p eal

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. A s a g en eral ru l e, a ri g h t o f d i rect ap p eal l i es fro m a fi n al ju dg m e n t ; t h a t i s , wh ere t h e cas e i s n o l on g er p en d i n g b el o w. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 ( a ) ( 1 )

. Here, t h e

act i on rem ai n s p en di n g i n th e s u p eri o r co u rt

. Becau s e t he o rd er was n ot fi n al

, t h e

d e f e n d a n t s were req ui red to co m p l y wi t h t h e i n terl o cu t o ry ap p eal pro ced u res o f

O C G A § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ) i n o rd er to o b t ai n ap p el l at e rev i ew. See Pa ce Co n s tr

. Co r p

. v. June 13, 2018No r t hp a r

k As so c., 2 1 5 Ga. Ap p. 4 3 8

, 4 39 (4 5 0 SE2 d 8 2 8 ) ( 1 9 9 4 )

. W e t h u s l ack

ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s id er t h i s d i rect ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/13/2018
P D, R

ORIGINAL ,^7^

' !, A^/

/HtSdVpUJ d. fpVUL*?

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MAY 04 2015

COURT OFCfliMINft. APPEALS

Abel Acosta, Clerk MAy 0l m
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending January 16, 2010

|Filer                                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Navarra | FBSEA          | Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Navarra, Pamplona (Navarra), Spain, to establish a representative office in Washington, D.C. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                   | Not available 
|Federal Register:                            | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 10.26





i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


AMENDMENT 3 TO THE EMPLOYMENT


AND
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT BETWEEN


i2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. AND ROMESH WADHWANI





This Amendment 3 (Amendment 3) effective as of January 1, 2002 (Effective Date), is made to the Employment and Non-Compete Agreement (Agreement) dated June 9th 2000 between i2
Technologies, Inc. (subsequently assigned to i2 Technologies US, Inc. Company) and Romesh Wadhwani (Employee).





|1. |  | The parties acknowledge that Employee has remained an employee of Company beyond the term of the Agreement, as amended by Amendment 2 thereto.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the Employment Term such that Employees employment will automatically terminate on June 30, 2002, with quarterly
extensions thereafter by mutual written agreement.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|3. |  | In the event of any conflict between this Amendment 3 and the Agreement, this Amendment 3 shall supercede. Except as expressly modified hereby, Amendments 1 and 2 to the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ ROBERT C. DONOHOO

/s/ ROMESH WADHWANIFor Company:  Robert C. Donohoo Vice President & General Counsel

Romesh Wadhwani
#### § 1.44 Office of Intelligence, Security and Emergency Response.

The Director of the Office of Intelligence, Security and Emergency Response is responsible for the development, coordination, and execution of plans and procedures for the Department to balance transportation security requirements with the safety, mobility and economic needs of the Nation through effective intelligence, security, preparedness and emergency response programs. The Director is the Department's principal Emergency Coordinator for the implementation of these programs.
§ 97.34-25 Additional requirements for hybrid work vests. ( a ) In addition to the other requirements in this subpart, commercial hybrid PFD's must be— ( 1 ) Used, stowed, and maintained in accordance with the procedures set out in the manual required for these devices by § 160.077-29 of this chapter and any limitation(s) marked on them; and
( 2 ) Of the same or similar design and have the same method of operation as each other hybrid PFD carried on board.
[CGD 78-174A, 51 FR 4350, Feb. 4, 1986]
SCWC

- 1 9

- 0000882

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK,

AS TRUSTEE, (CWABS 2006

- ABC1), Respondent/ Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v s

.
DALE ALLEN WARD; MELANIE RENEE WARD, Petitioners/ Defendants

- Appellants,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF

HAWAI ʻ I ; SUSAN JILL HOOVER; ISLAND PROPERTY INVESTMENTS; DESCHUTES RIVER PROPERTIES; PIILANI HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., S OLELY AS NOMINEE FOR ENCORE CREDIT CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ,

Respondents/ Defendants

- Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 9

- 0000 882 ; Civil No. 2CC 16 1000 209 (3) )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner s / Defendants

- Appellants Dale Allen Ward and

Melanie Renee Ward’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed

on August 1, 2022 , is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, September 6, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd. W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000882 06-SEP-2022 01:50 PM Dkt. 5 ODAC