T hi s di s pos i t i on i s not ap p ro p ri at e fo r p u b l i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by N i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

Th e p a n e l u n a n i mo u s l y c o n c l ude s t hi s c a s e i s s ui t a bl e f or de c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T
UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. T HE OD OR E J OH N K AC Z YN S KI , AK A FC, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10495 D . C. N o . 2 : 9 6
- c r - 0 0 2 5 9
- G EBG G H -1
ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E
. B urr e l l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J ul y12, 2011 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , C A N B Y , an d H A W K IN S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. In a p r i orapp e a l , w e a f f i rme d the di s tr i c tc ou rt ’ s pr op os e d p l a n f oraj ud i c i al
sa l e of c ertain it em s bel on gi ng t o T heod ore K ac zy nski and rem anded for further p r o c e e d in g s . U

ni ted Stat es v. Kaczy nski , 551 F . 3d 1120 ( 9th C i r . 2009)
. F ol l ow i ng 

# FI LED JU L 18 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he di s tr i c tc ourti ns t e a d or de r e d tha t the gove rnm e nt s houl d m a i nt a i n ac opy 1 o f K a c z y n s k i’s w r itin g s f o ro n e y e a rf

r o m th e d a te it s u p p lie s ac o m p le te c o p y to K a c z y n s k i’s d e s ig n e e , a n a lte rn a tiv e p la n p r o p o s e d b yK a c z y n s k i. 2 re m and, K ac zy nski no w appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderof S ept em ber 1 7 , 2 0 1 0 , w h ic h c la r if

ie d h o w s u c h s a le w o u ld b e c o n d u c te d
. K a c z y n s k i c la im s h is d e s ig n e e s h o u ld h a v e n in e tyd ay s p r io rto th e s a le o f h is
o r ig in a l w r itin g s to e x a m in e th e c o p ie s o f h is w r itin g s p r o v id e d b yth e g o v e rn m e n t. 1 W e t a ke j udi c i a l not i c e tha tthe i nt e rne tsal e o f K ac z y ns ki ’ s be l ongi ngs ha s a l r e a dy
o c c u rr e d . B o b E g e lk o , A u c t i o n R a is e s $ 2 3 2 , 2 4 6f o rA t ta c k V i c t i ms , S. F. C HR ON I CLE , Ju n e 4 , 2 0 1 1 , atC 1 . T h u s, w e are u n ab l e t o g ran tK aczyn sk i th e rel i ef h e req u est s; a n d th is c la im is r e n d e r e d m o o t. Se e Sandi dge v . State of W as hi ngton , 813 F . 2d 1025, 1025 ( 9th C i r . 1987) ( “ A c a s e i s m ooti f the r ev i ew i n g courtc a n no l onge rgr a nt
e f f e c tiv e r e lie f

.” )
. K a c z y n s k i f

u rth e rr e q u e s ts th a t th e g o v e rn m e n t b e o r d e r e d to p r o v id e h im w ith
a c om pl et e c o p y o f n o t o nl y hi s ow n w ri t i ng s, bu tof any w ri t i ng s by others w hi ch
w er e sei ze d fr om hi s M on t ana cabi n. T hi s request l ac ks any l egal basi s and appears to b e f o u n d e d o n am is r e a d in g o f o u r p r io ro p in io n . O u rp r io ro p in io n a d d r e s s e d o n ly
w h eth er th e fo rced sal e o f K a c zyn sk i ’ s p erso n al w ri t i n g s v i o l at ed th e F i rst A m endm en t. 55 1 F . 3d at11 23 -29. In concl ud i ng i tdi d n ot , w e e xp l ai ned that K a c z y ns ki ’ s abi l i ty t o c om m uni c a t e hi s thought s w a s noti m pa i r e d bythe l os s of theT he U ni t e d S t a t e s ’ pe ndi ng M ot i on f orS um m a ryA f

f i rm a nc e a nd O ppos i t i on 2 to A p p e lla n t’s M o tio n f o rS ta y is d e n ie d a s m o o t.

3 or i gi na l s , a nd not e d i n pa s s i ng tha tth e d i stri ctc ourtha d a l r e a dyor de r e d the gove rnm e ntt o pr ovi de K a c z y ns ki ( thr o u g h h i s de s i gna t e d r e c i pi e nt ) w i th c opi e s of
a n y p a g e h e h a d n o t a lr e a d y r e c e iv e d in le g ib le f o rm . I d. a t1127. W e w e r e not i m pos i ng ane w an d br oa de rr e qui r e m e nton the gove rnm e nt , butm e r e l yr e s t a t i ng w h a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt h a d a lr e a d yr e q u ir e d o f it. I d. ( quot i ng U

ni ted Stat es v. Kaczy nski , 4 4 6 F . S u p p . 2 d 1 1 4 6 , 1 1 5 4 n . 1 2 (E . D . C al. 2 0 0 6 )) . T h e d istrict co u rt’s
r e f us a l t o pr ovi de c opi e s of the s e i z e d w r i t i ngs of

othe r s the r e f

or e di d notvi ol a t e our d ir e c tiv e o n r e m a n d
. A FFI R M ED . 2