alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Interlink Electronics, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 033-93066, 333-39371, 333-53870 and 333-107174) on Form S-8and the registration statement (No. 333-112034) on Form S-3 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2003, relating to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), andcash flows of Interlink Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Interlink Electronics, Inc. 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 28, 2005
# Comments of Sempra Energy regarding EPA Methane Whi te Papers

Sent on behalf of Scott Crider, Vice President, Federal Government Affairs, Sempra Energy June 16, 2014 To: U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Sta ndards Submitted via electronic mail: oilandgas.whitepapers@epa.gov Re: Oil and Natural Gas Air Pollution Standards Whi te Papers on Methane and VOC Emissions technical comments Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, South ern California Gas Company and Sempra U.S. Gas and Power, 1 respectfully submit the attached comment letter and charge question responses. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the EPAOffice of Air Quality Planning and Standards White Papers on Methane and VOC Emissions. We are pleased to have the opportunity to offer inp ut on this important subject. Should you have any q uestions on the attached document, please contact Scott Crid er at scrider@sempra.com or 202­662­1704. Kind Regards, Kellen Kellen C. Gill, CPA Sempra Energy ' Office: (619) 696­2972  Mailing Address: Sempra Energy, 101 Ash Street, HQ 1 0H, San Diego, CA 92101 ' Mobile: (619) 820­7534 Electronic Correspondence: KGill@sempra.com
1 Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, LLC is not the same compan y as the California utilities San Diego Gas & Elect ric Company (SDG&E) or Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, LLC is not regulated by the California Public Utilities Commis sion.



### C. <KGill@Sempra.com> Kellen Gill, Mon 6/16/2014 5:46 PM
To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Crider, Scott B <SCrider@sempra.com>; 

###  1 attachment Sempra Energy - Comments on EPA methane white papers .pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 Comments of Sempra Energy regarding EPA Methane Whi...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/**  **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
§ 56.80-15 Heat treatment of bends and formed components. ( a ) Carbon-steel piping that has been heated to at least 1,650 °F (898 °C) for bending or other forming requires no subsequent heat treatment.
( b ) Ferritic alloy steel piping which has been heated for bending or other forming operations must receive a stress relieving treatment, a full anneal, or a normalize and temper treatment, as specified by the design specification before welding.
( c ) Cold bending and forming of carbon steel having a wall thickness of three-fourths of an inch and heavier, and all ferritic-alloy pipe in nominal pipe sizes of 4 inches and larger, or one-half-inch wall thickness or heavier, will require a stress-relieving treatment.
( d ) Cold bending of carbon-steel and ferritic-alloy steel pipe in sizes and wall thicknesses less than specified in 129.3.3 of ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2) may be used without a postheat treatment.
( e ) For other materials the heat treatment of bends and formed components must be such as to ensure pipe properties that are consistent with the original pipe specification.
( f ) All scale must be removed from heat treated pipe prior to installation.
( g ) Austenitic stainless-steel pipe that has been heated for bending or other forming may be used in the “as-bent” condition unless the design specification requires post-bending heat treatment.
[CGFR 68-62, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9979, June 17, 1970; CGD 73-254, 40 FR 40166, Sept. 2, 1975; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65185, Oct. 31, 2008]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending April 14, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0000700764
<NAME>        New Environmental Technologies Corporation

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              34
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      34
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2620
<OTHER-SE>                                      (31820)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        34
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.550 Plan review and revisions. ( a ) Mandatory reviews and revisions. The CAP and VAP(s) must be reviewed and revised as follows: ( 1 ) Every 2 years after the plan approval date, the company shall review the CAP and update all information required by § 8.530.
( 2 ) Every 5 years after the plan approval date, the Coast Guard SIP Advisor and the Company SIP Agent will review the VAP.
( 3 ) If a reportable casualty occurs, the cognizant OCMI will review the portions of the VAP related to equipment, training, personnel, and systems involved in the casualty and determine whether revisions to the VAP are appropriate.
( 4 ) When statutes or regulations change, the appropriate sections of the CAP and VAP(s) will be revised.
( b ) *Discretionary reviews and revisions.* The CAP and VAP(s) may be reviewed and revised by the company at any time. The revisions must be submitted to the cognizant OCMI for approval.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6583
RICHARD WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JULIAN L. WALTERS; MICHAEL G. HARDING; TIMOTHY V. CUMMINGS; DANNY R. BEACHUM; CLYDE LEAR; JAMES C. CALDWELL, Chief; CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-95-581-2-23) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr., STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order entering judgment for Defendants in accordance with a jury's verdict returned in this42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action alleging excessive use of force during the execution of a lawful search warrant. We have reviewed the record and other materials before us and find no reversible error. The parties' versions of events were contradictory. We will notdisturb the jury's credibility determination in favor of Defendants, nor will we weigh the evidence anew. See United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT - ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

Pursuant to the provisions of Section  16-10-a-1002 of the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act, this  "Corporation"  adopts the following Articles of Amendment
to its Articles of Incorporation:

1. The name of the Corporation is Mammoth Resources, Inc.

2. The following  Article of the Articles of Incorporation is amended to read as
follows:

Article I is replaced with the following:

The name of the corporation is hereby changed to:

Symphony Telecom International, Inc.

3. The date of adoption of this Amendment was March 23, 2000.

4. The foregoing was voted upon with unanimous  (100%)  approval of the Board of
Directors, without the need for shareholder approval.

5. The effective time and date of these articles of amendment  shall be the date
and time of filing with the State of Utah. Executed on March 23, 2000.

Signatures:  /s/ Daniel Cullen, President
             -----------------------------
                 Daniel Cullen, President

            /s/  Gilles Trahan, Secretary
            ------------------------------
                 Gilles Trahan, Secretary
#### Ernest Ludwig, *Respondent, v.*Rose Fox and David Fox, *Appellants.*

— J udgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
§ 72.01-10 Vessels using fuel having a flashpoint of 110 degrees F. or lower. ( a ) Where liquid fuel having a flashpoint of 110 degrees F. or lower is carried for main or auxiliary machinery or for starting purposes, such machinery and fuel tanks shall be in separate vapor tight compartments separating each from the other and from the remainder of the vessel.
( b ) [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000828737
<NAME>                        WELLS ALUMINUM CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         8,239
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 31,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                     469
<INVENTORY>                                   23,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              64,846
<PP&E>                                        66,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                35,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               133,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         26,819
<BONDS>                                      105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           7
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  133,413
<SALES>                                       246,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              246,194
<CGS>                                         205,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 226,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 8,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,897
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>
#### § 502.103 [Reserved]
§ 71.50-29 Hull examination reports. ( a ) If you use only divers for the underwater survey portion of the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE), you must provide the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), with a written hull examination report. This report must include thickness gauging results, bearing clearances, a copy of the audio and video recordings, and any other information that will help the OCMI evaluate your vessel for a credit hull exam. The third party examiner must sign the report and confirm the validity of its contents.
( b ) If you use an underwater ROV as the predominant means to examine the vessel's underwater hull plating, you must provide the OCMI with a report in the format that is accepted by the OCMI, per § 71.50-27(b) of this part.
( c ) The OCMI will evaluate the hull examination report and grant a credit hull exam if satisfied with the condition of the vessel. If approved and you exclusively use divers to examine the hull plating, you may receive a credit hull exam up to 36 months. (Underwater examinations are required twice every 5 years). If approved and you use an underwater ROV as the predominant means to examine the underwater hull plating, you may receive a credit hull exam up to 60 months (5 years).
( d ) At least 60 days prior to each scheduled underwater exam, the owner may request a waiver from the OCMI if: ( 1 ) A satisfactory exam has been completed within the last three years;
( 2 ) The conditions during the last exam allowed at least 80 percent of the bottom surface to be viewed and recorded; and
( 3 ) The results of the last exam indicated that an extended interval is safe and reasonable.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21078, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended by USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47382, Aug. 5, 2004]
98-2145.

#### Kohrman, Jackson & Krantz, P.L.L. v. Fraiberg.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73276. This cause is pending before the court as a disez-etionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending May 2, 2009

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS NATIONAL CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Citizens National Corporation, Wisner, Nebraska to acquire up to an additional 2 percent for a total of 32.7 percent of the voting shares of Republic Corporation, parent of United Republic Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/29/2009
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 05/29/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-1929.

#### State v. Schultz.

Hamilton App. No. C-970954. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause consolidated with 98-1779, *supra.*

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, May 12, 1995 (65), Para 65.10 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 696-697]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.65.10  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. LARGENT:

       Page 232, strike lines 13 through 17 and insert the 
     following:
       ``(7) $2,250,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;
       ``(8) $2,300,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;
       ``(9) $2,300,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;
       ``(10) $2,300,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; and
       ``(11) $2,300,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.''.
       Page 232, strike line 18 and all that follows through line 
     20 on page 234.

[[Page 697]]

       Conform the table of contents of the bill accordingly.
       Page 32, line 6, strike ``$3,000,000,000'' and insert 
     ``2,250,000,000''.

It was decided in the

Yeas

209

affirmative

Nays

192
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 16, 2010

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIRST REGION BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Mr. William Lee Hale and the William Lee Hale Trust, both of Bland, Virginia, acting in concert to retain control 20.86% of the voting shares of First Regions Bancshares, Inc., Richlands, Virginia. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                     | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------ | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMUNITY BK OF TRI-CTY, WALDORF, MARYLAND | 697978  | 06/28/2010 | 09/30/2010     | S         | Large Bank 
|MONARCH BK, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA           | 2718345 | 05/10/2010 | 10/06/2010     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company to Acquire Lands of George E. Mumford *et al*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Haight, J.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 4.1

     SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01, PAR VALUE, OF THE COMPANY


[CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF COLLEGIATE PACIFIC INC.-STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA]


   COMMON STOCK                                                   COMMON STOCK

      NUMBER                                                         NUMBER
   CP                       

                            COLLEGIATE PACIFIC INC.
        INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
                                                                 


                                          See reverse for certain definitions
                                                                

   THIS CERTIFIES THAT




   is the owner and registered holder of


FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF $.01 OF

=========================== COLLEGIATE PACIFIC INC. ===========================
transferable only on the books of the corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly 
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer 
Agent and registered by the Registrar.

   WITNESS the facsimile seal and facsimile signatures of its duly authorized 
officers.


Dated:
                                     [SEAL]
                     COLLEGIATE PACIFIC INC. CORPORATE SEAL
                                      1987
                                  PENNSYLVANIA


                    SECRETARY                                PRESIDENT
                                                             AUTHORIZED OFFICER

                                   CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER AND TRUST COMPANY
                                                                 TRANSFER AGENT
                                                                  AND REGISTRAR