alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 151

To amend chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the provision

prohibiting certain State and local employees from seeking elective office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, to

eliminate the provision prohibiting certain State and local

employees from seeking elective office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Em5 ployees Bill of Political Rights’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PROHIBITION.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1502(a) of title 5, United

8 States Code, is amended—

9 (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘or’’ after the

10 semicolon;
2

•HR 151 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in2 serting a period; and

3 (3) by striking paragraph (3).

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

5 (1) SECTION 1502 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES

6 CODE.—Section 1502 of title 5, United States Code,

7 is amended by striking subsection (c).

8 (2) SECTION 1503 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES

9 CODE.—

10 (A) REPEAL.—Section 1503 of title 5,

11 United States Code, is repealed.

12 (B) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relat13 ing to section 1503 in the table of sections for

14 chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, is re15 pealed.

Æ
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 4, 2008

|Filer                               | Filing Type      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|RICHWOOD BANKING COMPANY, INC., THE | Premises* Branch | Notice by The Richwood Banking Company, Richwood, OH to establish a branch at 4848 Napoleon Street, Huntsville, OH and request for permission to exceed its limit of investment in premises. | Newspaper:10/07/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 10/07/2008      
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable  

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|APPLE CREEK BKG CO, APPLE CREEK, OHIO | 213912  | 07/07/2008 | 09/19/2008     | S         | Small Bank 
|BUCKEYE CMNTY BK, LORAIN, OHIO        | 2836306 | 06/23/2008 | 09/26/2008     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31156-31157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2695]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that National Bald Eagle 
Management Guidelines are available to the public.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines can 
be obtained by writing to: Eliza Savage, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 4401 North Fairfax 
Drive, Mail Stop MBSP-4107, Arlington, VA 22203. The guidelines may 
also be obtained via the Internet at: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/baldeagle.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliza Savage, Division of Migratory 
Bird Management, (see ADDRESSES section); or via e-mail at: [email protected]; telephone: (703) 358-2329; or facsimile: (703) 358-
2217.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In anticipation of the possible removal of 
the bald eagle from the list of threatened species under the Endangered 
Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Service has developed 
National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land 
managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid disturbing bald 
eagles. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 
(Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the primary law protecting 
bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and 
provides a statutory definition of ``take'' that includes ``disturb.''
    The Service developed National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines, a 
draft of which was made available for public comment February 16, 2006 
(71 FR 8309). We received 86 comments on the guidelines, which we took 
into consideration in developing this final document. The guidelines 
provide the public information to help prevent disturbance of bald 
eagles and recommend additional non-binding practices that can benefit 
bald eagles.
    In addition to this notice, the Service is publishing three related 
documents elsewhere in today's Federal Register: a final rule, 
codifying the Eagle Act definition of ``disturb''; a notice of 
availability of the final environmental assessment for the definition 
of ``disturb''; and a proposed rule to codify additional take 
authorizations under the Eagle Act.

[[Page 31157]]

    Dated: May 16, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 07-2695 Filed 6-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.21
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Mining Properties  McArthur River and Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated March
27, 2009 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and(b)
    
    under the headings Our Mineral Reserves and Resources  Mineral Reserves and
Resources and Qualified Persons in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated February
16, 2009 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
    /s/ Leslie (Les) D. YesnikName:
    
    Leslie (Les) D. Yesnik, P. Eng.Title:
    
    General Manager, Key Lake operations, 
Cameco Corporation
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 2, 2010

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at Northwest Corner of Highway 277 & A Street, Elgin, Oklahoma. | Newspaper:01/15/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 01/15/2010    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-cr-20382

v.

HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

D-1 PAUL NICOLETTI,

Defendant.

 /

MOTION AND SUPPORTING

MEMORANDUM TO STRIKE PRO SE MOTIONS

The United States, through counsel, respectfully moves this Court 

to strike D-1 PAUL NICOLETTI’s [NICOLETTI] pro se filings: Doc. #80: 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Prosecutorial Misconduct 

and Grand Jury Abuse; Doc. #81: Defendant’s Brief in Support of Motion 

to Dismiss; and Doc. #82: Defendant’s Motion to Modify Order Setting 

Conditions of Release.

This Court set the tenth (and last) motion cut-off date for

February 20, 2018. (Doc. # 74:Order).1 The motions which are the 

subject of this Motion to Strike are therefore out of time. NICOLETTI 

 

1 Earlier Cut-Off Dates were: 10/9/15 (Doc. #10), 4/12/16 (Doc. #15), 

6/6/16 (Doc. #20), 7/20/16 (Doc. #23), 7/22/16 (Doc. #24), 8/5/16 (Doc. 

#25), 11/27/17 (Doc. #70), 12/11/17 (Doc. #71), and 12/13/17 (Doc. #72). 

Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 84 filed 06/25/18 PageID.817 Page 1 of 3
2

has, at all times since his arraignment on the indictment, been 

represented by competent counsel of record, and the government has 

stipulated to reschedule the motion cut-off date to accommodate the 

defense on each of those ten prior occasions. All of NICOLETTI’s 

motions should therefore have been filed on or before February 20, 2018.

Additionally, NICOLETTI still has competent counsel of record 

who has represented him in this case since May 10, 2017. Although he 

has recently filed a Motion to Withdrawal, it is inappropriate for any 

defendant to file motions pro se when s/he continues to be represented 

by counsel.

For all of these reasons, NICOLETTI’s motions, filed June 22, 

2018, or four months past the motion cut-off date, should not be 

considered by the Court, and should be stricken from the record. 

Respectfully submitted,

MATTHEW SCHNEIDER

United States Attorney

s/Craig A. Weier (P33261)

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 226-9678

Dated: June 25, 2018 E-Mail: craig.weier@usdoj.gov

Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 84 filed 06/25/18 PageID.818 Page 2 of 3
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-cr-20382

v.

HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

D-1 PAUL NICOLETTI,

Defendant.

 /

PROOF OF SERVICE

Craig A. Weier, on June 25, 2018, filed the foregoing Motion And 

Supporting Memorandum To Strike Pro Se Motions using the Court’s 

Electronic Court Filing System, which automatically provides notice and 

a copy of this pleading to counsel of record, Michael J. Harrison.

Respectfully submitted,

MATTHEW SCHNEIDER

United States Attorney

s/Craig A. Weier (P33261)

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 226-9678

E-Mail: craig.weier@usdoj.gov

Dated: June 25, 2018

Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 84 filed 06/25/18 PageID.819 Page 3 of 3
§ 565.5 Exceptions. All controlled carriers shall be subject to provisions of this part and section 9 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40701-40706) except those which meet the following exceptions: ( a ) When the vessels of the controlling state are entitled by a treaty of the United States to receive national or most-favored-nation treatment; or
( b ) When the controlled carrier operates in a trade served exclusively by controlled carriers.
[64 FR 8010, Feb. 18, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 50735, Oct. 1, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,417
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,943
<PP&E>                                          41,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,128
<BONDS>                                          8,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           228
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,645
<SALES>                                         29,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,058
<CGS>                                           23,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit  32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     3)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     4)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 16, 2005                  By /s/ John Benson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Benson, Chief Financial Officer
§ 76.15-40 Pressure relief. ( a ) Where necessary, relatively tight compartments such as refrigeration spaces, paint lockers, etc., shall be provided with suitable means for relieving excessive pressure accumulating within the compartment when the carbon dioxide is injected.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16940, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 66-33, 31 FR 15283, Dec. 6, 1966]
#### § 53.10-10 Certification by stamping.

Stamping of heating boilers must be as indicated in HG-530 of Section IV of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 53.01-1).

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65164, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 80.15 Ocean voyage.

An ocean voyage for the purposes of this part means:

A voyage on any body of water seaward of the low water mark such as an ocean or arm thereof, other major bodies of water such as seas, gulfs, and straits, except voyages exclusively within harbors and small coastal indentations.

[CGD 79-180, 48 FR 7456, Feb. 22, 1983]
#### § 315.1 Purpose.

This part summarizes the procedures governing the award and administration of Agency Agreements in the form of Service Agreements and Ship Manager Contracts entered into between the United States of America, acting by and through the Director, National Shipping Authority (NSA) of the Maritime Administration (MARAD), Department of Transportation, and Agents which will manage or otherwise conduct the business of one or more vessels owned, controlled or time-chartered by the United States, which vessel(s) may be assigned to Agents from time to time pursuant to the specific provisions of a Service Agreement or Ship Manager Contract.
§ 56.25-15 Gaskets (modifies 108.4). ( a ) Gaskets must be made of materials which are not injuriously affected by the fluid or by temperature.
( b ) Each gasket must conform to the design requirements of the applicable standards of table 2 to § 56.60-1.
( c ) Only metallic and suitable asbestos-free nonmetallic gaskets may be used on flat or raised face flanges if the expected normal operating pressure exceeds 720 psig or the operating temperature exceeds 750 °F.
( d ) The use of metal and nonmetallic gaskets is not limited as to pressure provided the gasket materials are suitable for the maximum fluid temperatures.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-035, 54 FR 36316, Sept. 1, 1989; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### Towne *v.*Rice.

The storage of a wagon by the vendee of the same, six days after the sale, in the barn of the vendor over night for convenience and security, held, under the circumstances of the case, not to be conclusive evidence of a secret and fraudulent trust in the sale.

*413Replevin, for a buggy wagon. Tho pleadings raised the issue whether the wagon at the time of the taking was the property of Israel F. Towne, or of Gardner Towne, the plaintiff. Facts found by a referee. Israel resided in Stoddard and Gardner in Hillsborough, and are brothers. Israel being about to *remove to*Massachusetts with his family, sold to Gardner a horse, harness, and the buggy wagon in question, for which he had no further use, and needed their value in money. Gardner took immediate, possession, putting the horse and harness in the barn of a neighbor, and the wagon under his own mill-shed, sixty rods from the dwelling of Israel. On the next day, or next but one, Israel’s wife hired the team of Gardner, and in company with her brother went to Ware, where she remained four or five days on a visit to another brother. The horse becoming disabled, she procured her brother’s horse and returned home, arriving just at night. The horse was put in Israel’s barn, and the wagon left outside. Gardner came in the evening and drew it into the barn, for his own convenience and the security of the wagon. Soon after, on the same evening, the defendant, who was a deputy sheriff, attached the wagon and took it away. Before attaching it he wras informed by Israel that he had sold it and got his pay. Israel made no use of the wagon after he sold it. The sale and purchase of the wagon were without fraudulent intent on the paid of both Israel and Gardner.

The court ordered judgment on the report for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted.

*Healey,*for the defendant.

*Pierce Sf Holman*and *Woodward,*for the plaintiff.

Smith, J.

Tho sale of the wagon was not fraudulent in fact or in law. The change of possession was such as usually follows a change of ownership. It was open, visible, and substantial, the wagon being immediately removed by the plaintiff to his own premises, and taken into his own exclusive possession. The subsequent hiring and use of the wagon by the vendor’s wife was not a hiring or use by the husband. Her possession of the wagon as the bailee for hire of the plaintiff was not the possession of the husband nor of his agent. It does not appear that upon her return from Ware she parted with1 the possession of the wagon, or put it into the possession of her husband. If the plaintiff’s storing it in the barn for his own convenience and the security of the wagon was placing it in the vendor’s possession, it was not such a possession by the vendor as under the circumstances shows that the sale was accompanied with a secret trust. Subsequent possession by the vendor is open to explanation, and the explanation in this case is satisfactory.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Clauk, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### Erwin Butterworth, *Appellant, v.*Mario Liebman, Respondent.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs.