alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                                                      ----------

                    COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

          Statement Re:  Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Common 
                          and Common Equivalent Share

                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                                    June 30,                      June 30,
                                              1997           1996           1997            1996
                                          -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
<S>                                       <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>
Net Income (Loss)                         $  (856,945)    $ 1,180,956    $  (480,426)    $ 1,200,104
                                          ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========
Primary Earnings (Loss) Per Share
---------------------------------
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                               22,820,378      23,201,993     23,131,544      23,118,114

Dilutive effect of outstanding common
 equivalent shares                                  -         606,779              -         508,654
                                          -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding      22,820,378      23,808,772     23,131,544      23,626,768
                                          ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========
Net income (loss) per common and common
 equivalent share                         $      (.04)    $       .05    $      (.02)    $       .05
                                          ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========

Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
----------------------------------------
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                               22,820,378      23,201,993     23,131,544      23,118,114

Dilutive effect of outstanding common
 equivalent shares                                  -         606,779              -         635,642
                                          -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding      22,820,378      23,808,772     23,131,544      23,753,756
                                          ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========
Net income (loss) per common and common
 equivalent share                         $      (.04)    $       .05    $      (.02)    $       .05
                                          ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to his
knowledge:

         1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and
         2)       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2002                By  /s/ L.S. Smith                     .
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           L.S. Smith, Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
  /s/ Cameron R. NelsonCameron R. NelsonVice President, Finance &
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
QLT Inc.
§ 327.43 Insurance and other subrogated claims. ( a ) The claims of an insured (subrogor) and an insurer (subrogee) for damages arising out of the same incident constitute a single claim.
( b ) An insured (subrogor) and an insurer (subrogee) may file a claim jointly or separately. If the insurer has fully reimbursed the insured, payment will only be made to the insurer. If separate claims are filed, the settlement will be made payable to each claimant to the extent of that claimant's undisputed interest. If joint claims are filed, the settlement will be sent to the insurer.
( c ) Each claimant shall include with a claim, a written disclosure concerning insurance coverage including: ( 1 ) The names and addresses of all insurers;
( 2 ) The kind and amount of insurance;
( 3 ) The policy number; and
( 4 ) Whether a claim has been or will be presented to an insurer, and, if so, the amount of that claim; and whether the insurer has paid the claim in whole or in part, or has indicated payment will be made.
( d ) Each subrogee shall substantiate an interest or right to file a claim by appropriate documentary evidence and shall support the claim as to liability and measure of damages in the same manner as required of any other claimant. Documentary evidence of payment to a subrogor does not constitute evidence of liability of the United States or conclusive evidence of the amount of damages. The Maritime Administration makes an independent determination on the issues of fact and law based upon the evidence of record.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending August 13, 2011

|Filer                          | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------ | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST BANCORP OF INDIANA, INC. | * 3A1       | First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc., Evansville, Indiana, to become a bank holding company through the conversion of First Federal Savings Bank, Evansville, Indiana, from a federally chartered savings bank to a state chartered commercial bank. | Newspaper:08/29/2011Federal Register:09/12/2011
|Newspaper:                     | 08/29/2011 
|Federal Register:              | 09/12/2011 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act),
each of the undersigned officers of Novo Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the Company), does hereby certify that: The Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, (the
Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
780(d)) and information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Steven W. CapleSteven W. CaplePresident(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Patrick G. MackeyPatrick G. MackeySenior Vice President(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 Dated: September 24, 2004 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the
Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document. The accompanying notes are
an integral part of this statement.
#### § 401.500 Penalties for violations.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76352, Sept. 17, 2024.

Any person, including a pilot, master, owner, or agent, who violates any provision of this part shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty as set forth in 46 U.S.C. 9308.

[CGD 88-111, 55 FR 17581, Apr. 25, 1990. Redesignated at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, June 29, 1998]
EXHIBIT 24-D
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes and appointsDouglas D. Burkett, Ph. D. and Andrew A. Stevens, and each of them severally,as his attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,to sign and file on his behalf individually and in each such capacity statedbelow, Zila, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31,2004, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, The NASDAQ Stock Market, and otherwise, as fully as such personcould do in person, hereby verifying and confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact, or their or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully door cause to be done by virtue hereof.     **Signatures** **Title** **Date** **Douglas D. Burkett, Ph. D.** President and Chief Executive Officerand a Director September 30, 2004**Principal Executive Officer**          **Andrew A. Stevens** Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer September 30, 2004**Principal Financial andAccounting Officer**         **Directors**          **Morris C. Aaron**   September 30 , 2004     **/s/ Leslie H. Green****Leslie H. Green**   September 30, 2004      **Christopher D. Johnson**   September 30, 2004      **Michael S. Lesser**   September 30, 2004      **John Edward Porter**   September 30, 2004      **S. Timothy Rose, D.D.S.**   September 30, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 8.250 Acceptance of standards and functions delegated under existing regulations. ( a ) Classification society class rules will only be accepted as equivalent to Coast Guard regulatory standards when that classification society has received authorization to conduct a related delegated function.
( b ) A recognized classification society may not conduct any delegated function under this title until it receives a separate written authorization from the Commandant to conduct that specific function.
§ 502.92 Exemption procedures—general. ( a ) *Authority.* The Commission, upon application or on its own motion, may by order or regulation exempt for the future any class of agreements between persons subject to the Shipping Act of 1984 or any specified activity of those persons from any requirement of the Act if the Commission finds that the exemption will not result in substantial reduction in competition or be detrimental to commerce. The Commission may attach conditions to any exemption and may, by order, revoke any exemption.
( b ) *Application for exemption.* Any person may petition the Commission for an exemption or revocation of an exemption of any class of agreements or an individual agreement or any specified activity pursuant to section 16 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40103). A petition for exemption must state the particular requirement of the Shipping Act of 1984 for which exemption is sought. The petition must also include a statement of the reasons why an exemption should be granted or revoked, must provide information relevant to any finding required by the Act and must comply with § 502.76. Where a petition for exemption of an individual agreement is made, the application must include a copy of the agreement. Unless a petition specifically requests an exemption by regulation, the Commission must evaluate the petition as a request for an exemption by order.
( c ) *Participation by interested persons.* No order or regulation of exemption or revocation of exemption may be issued unless opportunity for hearing has been afforded interested persons and departments and agencies of the United States.
( d ) Federal Register notice. Notice of any proposed exemption or revocation of exemption, whether upon petition or the Commission's own motion, must be published in the Federal Register. The notice must include when applicable: ( 1 ) A short title for the proposed exemption or the title of the existing exemption;
( 2 ) The identity of the party proposing the exemption or seeking revocation;
( 3 ) A concise summary of the agreement or class of agreements or specified activity for which exemption is sought, or the exemption which is to be revoked;
( 4 ) A statement that the petition and any accompanying information are available for inspection in the Commission's offices in Washington, DC; and
( 5 ) The final date for filing comments regarding the proposal. [Rule 74.]
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.13 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 584]
[Pages 699-700]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.13  providing for the consideration of h.r. 584

  Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 145):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 584) to direct the Secretary of the Interior 
     to convey a fish hatchery to the State of Iowa. The first 
     reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate 
     shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
     equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
     minority member of the Committee on Resources. After general 
     debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 
     five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. At the 
     conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
     Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
     such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
     question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
     amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
     motion except one motion to recommit.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Mrs. WALDHOLTZ, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to

[[Page 700]]

was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
         I, Michael J. Blumenfeld, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Collegiate Pacific Inc.certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the “Report”) ofCollegiate Pacific Inc. for the annual period ended June 30, 2004; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;
(c) disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this Report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: June 27, 2005                                     /s/ Michael J. Blumenfeld   Michael J. Blumenfeld, Chairman and Chief   Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7525

GREGORY K. CLINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHERYL DEAN RILEY, in her individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Omar Jawdat Aboulhosn, Magistrate Judge. (3:20-cv-00151-TEJ-OJA)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory K. Clinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory K. Clinton seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying Clinton’s

motion for appointment of counsel in his underlying civil action, filed pursuant to Bivens 

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Clinton seeks to 

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Miller v. 

Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We deny Clinton’s motions for summary judgment and to amend his appeal 

and correct the judgment. We further deny as moot Clinton’s motion to expedite and for 

release pending resolution of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 92.25-15 Guards in dangerous places. ( a ) Suitable hand covers, guards, or rails shall be installed in way of all exposed and dangerous places such as gears, machinery, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1348
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               39
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1348
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    61
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    86
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (25)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (25)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (25)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.66)


</TABLE>