alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2516]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Structural Safety of Department of Veterans 
Affairs Facilities; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Structural Safety of Department of Veterans 
Affairs Facilities will be held on June 14-15, 2007, in Room 4442, 
Export Import Bank, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. The June 
14 session will be from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., and the June 15 session 
will be from 8:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on matters of structural safety in the construction and 
remodeling of VA facilities and to recommend standards for use by VA in 
the construction and alteration of its facilities.
    On June 14, the Committee will review developments in the fields of 
fire safety issues and structural design as they relate to seismic and 
other natural hazards, impact on the safety of buildings. On June 15, 
the Committee will receive appropriate briefings and presentations on 
current seismic, natural hazards and fire safety issues that are 
particularly relevant to facilities owned and leased by the Department. 
The Committee will also discuss appropriate structural and fire safety 
recommendations for inclusion in VA's standards.
    No time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the 
public. However, the Committee will accept written statements. 
Statements should be sent to Krishna K. Banga, Senior Structural 
Engineer, Facilities Quality Service, Office of Construction & 
Facilities Management (00CFM1A), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Those wishing to attend 
should contact Mr. Banga at (202) 565-9370.

    Dated: May 15, 2007.

    By direction of the Secretary.
 E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-2516 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-07-M
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 4.9 
  



 
  
 Adherex Technologies Inc.

 Stock Option Plan 
 Stock Option Agreement 
 Appendix “A” 
  
 December 30, 2003 
  
 William P. Peters, M.D., Ph.D., MBA 
 10000 Crystal Cove 
 Chapel Hill, NC 27517 
  
 Dear Bill: 
  
 This is to advise you that you have
been granted an option (the “Option”) to purchase 3,500,000 Common Shares at a price of $0.45 per share under the Adherex Technologies Inc. Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). 
  
 This Option expires seven years following the date of grant, which appears in the upper right
hand corner of this notice, subject to other conditions of the Plan. 
  
 Subject
to such expiry and the other provisions of the Plan, this Option is exercisable in such amounts and at any time on or after: 
  
 1,166,667 shares on December 30, 2003, 
 1,166,667 shares on December 30, 2004, 
 1,166,666 shares on December 30, 2005. 
  
 Please refer to the Plan explanatory document for any additional information regarding the
exercise of your Option and completion of the Option Exercise Form. Please execute a copy of this grant where indicated below and deliver it to Scott Murray, Adherex Technologies Inc., 2300 Englert Drive, Suite G, Durham, NC 27713 to acknowledge
your acceptance of the terms hereof. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,
  
 ADHEREX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

		
	By:	 	/S/    SCOTT
MURRAY        
	 	 	 Scott Murray,
 Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary


  
 I have read, understood and accept the
vesting provisions above and each of the terms and conditions described in a document called Adherex Technologies Inc. Stock Option Plan and accept the foregoing grant of options on such basis. 
  

			
	Dated the 29 day of November, 2004.
	
	/S/    WILLIAM P.
PETERS        
	Signature
254 P.2d 410

#### In re CARRIE. CARRIE v. CARRIE et al.

No. 7923.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 3, 1953.

*504Anderson & Kaufman, Boise, for appellant.

Elam & Burke, Boise, for respondents.

KEETON, Justice.

Claimant, a minor, sought to recover compensation under the provisions of the-Workmen’s Compensation Law, I.C. § 72— 101 et seq., due to the death of her father. The board heard the evidence and entered an order denying compensation and dismissing the proceedings.

Deceased was employed installing congoleum tile in a bathroom and trimming-with metal strippings. He was last seen, alive about 6:00 P. M. on May 12, 1949, and his body, clad in work clothes, was discovered in the motel where he had been working about 7:30 P. M.

The board found that the primary cause-of deceased’s death was coronary thrombosis or occlusion; and further that at the time of deceased’s death he was not actually-engaged at work; had just returned to his. lodgings from his evening meal; and concluded compensation should be denied.

*505Deceased had a history of previous heart ■ailments and was doctored for angina pectoris in 1944.

The finding of the board that there was no accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, or any violence to the physical structure of the body which caused the death is fully supported by the evidence.

Appellant contends that the work being performed by the deceased was of an arduous, hard nature, and thus brought on the heart attack.

To constitute an accident within the Workmen’s Compensation Act there must be an untoward, unforeseen or unexpected event or series of events causing injury. Hard work, if it was, does not constitute such an accident. Walters v. City of Wieser, 66 Idaho, 615, 164 P.2d 593.

The heart ailment or condition suffered by the deceased was not caused by an industrial accident, nor was there any violence to the physical structure of the body.

Death is not in itself an “accident” within the statutory definition in Workmen’s Compensation Act, though often the result of accident.

Employers’ liability compensation is not meant or intended as life or health insurance but is purely accident and occupational disease insurance. Wade v. Pacific Coast Elevator Co., 64 Idaho 176, 129 P.2d 894.

We find no error. Order is affirmed, Costs to respondents,

PORTER, C. J., GIVENS and TAYL0R, JJ., and LOWE, D.J., concur,
##### 



Exhibit 23.4

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Partners
MinnTex Investment Partners LP:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Numbers 333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and 33-09485) on Forms S-3
and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated February 13,
2004, with respect to the balance sheets of MinnTex Investment Partners LP as
of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations,
changes in partners capital, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2003 and the period March 11, 2002 (date of inception) through December 31,
2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K
of FirstCity Financial Corporation.

KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending February 27, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location             | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CITIZENS B&TC, BIG TIMBER, MONTANA | 657758 | 09/28/2009 | 02/04/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 80.10 Applicability. Except as exempted in § 80.20, this part applies to— ( a ) Owners, operators, agents, or any persons selling passage on a foreign or domestic vessel of one hundred gross tons or over having berth or stateroom accommodations for fifty or more passengers and embarking passengers at a United States port for a coastwise or an international voyage; and (b) owners, operators, agents, and other persons involved in the publishing and distribution of promotional material in or over any medium of communication within the United States offering passage or soliciting passengers for an ocean voyage anywhere in the world, by a vessel of one hundred gross tons or over having berth or stateroom accommodations for fifty or more passengers, regardless of whether passengers are embarked at United States ports for said voyage.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 79-180, 48 FR 7456, Feb. 22, 1983]
#### In the Matter of James L. Barclay to vacate an Assessment.

Order reversed; petition denied,'with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
#### Gray v. Fifield.

Absence from the state will not prevent the statute of limitations from running, when the defendant was in a position to receive notice from a summons left at his domicile in this state.

Assumpsit, to recover the balance of the defendant’s promissory-note, dated January 10, 1870, upon which there are endorsed several partial payments, the last being dated August 8, 1872. Plea, the general issue, with a brief statement of the statute of limitations. Facts found by a referee.

At the date of the note the defendant resided in this state, and has continued to reside here to the present time, except as hereafter stated. In November or December, 1874, he broke up housekeeping in Laconia, his wife going to her father’s in Franklin with their goods and furniture, and the defendant to Massachusetts, where he was employed by different parties until May, 1875. While so employed, he went home to his family in Franklin as often as once in three or four weeks, and sometimes as often as once in two or three weeks. During his absence, his wife and child, about two years of age, occupied a kitchen and sleeping-room in her father’s house, her goods, except what she used, being stored in the attic. She lived apart from her father’s family, and did her own work, her husband contributing to her support. After his return fr.om Massachusetts in May, 1875, they procured another tenement and kept house, living in Franklin until January, 1878, and in Manchester since that time.

The referee found for the defendant.

*Andrews,*for the plaintiff.

*.Foote,*for the defendant.

Smith, J.

The referee was warranted in finding that the defendant was in a position to receive notice of a suit from a summons left at his home in Franklin. Not only his legal domicile, but his place of abode, within the meaning of the statute, was in this state. *Gilman*v. *Cutts,*23 N. H. 376, *385*— S. *C.,*27 N. H. 348, 358; *Ward*v. *Cole,*32 N. H. 452; *Brown*v. *Rollins,*44 N. H. 446.

*Judgment for the defendant.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (STERLING
WEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,158
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              99
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,096
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,730
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,656
<LOANS>                                         69,032
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,646
<DEPOSITS>                                      89,306
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,107
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,686
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,453)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  98,646
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,787
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  346
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   574
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,707
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,876
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,920
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,787
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      265
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    556
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.36
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,180
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,510
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      510
<RECOVERIES>                                        22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,285
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 97.37-42 Markings for lifesaving appliances, instructions to passengers, and stowage locations.

Lifesaving appliances, instructions to passengers, and stowage locations must be marked in accordance with subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25289, May 20, 1996]
2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FAISAL G. KHALAF, Ph.D., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

a Delaware corporation, 

BENNIE FOWLER and 

JAY ZHOU, jointly and severally, 

Defendants. 

Case No: 15-cv-12604 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

/ 

JUDGMENT 

 Pursuant to the opinion and judgment issued by the Sixth Circuit on August 

31, 2020 and the mandate issued on October 8, 2020; 

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is hereby entered for 

Defendants and against Plaintiff. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 17, 2021 

 

Case 2:15-cv-12604-MFL-DRG ECF No. 161, PageID.7446 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 2
3 

APPROVED: 

KIENBAUM HARDY VIVIANO 

 PELTON & FORREST, P.L.C. 

BY: /s/William B. Forrest III 

 Elizabeth P. Hardy (P37426) 

 William B. Forrest III (P60311) 

 Thomas J. Davis (P78626) 

Attorneys for Defendants 

280 N. Old Woodward Ave., Suite 400 

Birmingham, Michigan 48009 

(248) 645-0000 

ehardy@khvpf.com 

wforrest@khvpf.com 

tdavis@khvpf.com 

APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: 

STERLING ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

By: /s/Carol A. Laughbaum (with permission) 

 Carol A. Laughbaum (P41711) 

 Raymond J. Sterling (P34456) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway 

Suite 250 

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 

(248) 644-1500 

claughbaum@sterlingattorneys.com 

rsterling@sterlingattorneys.com 

403164 

Case 2:15-cv-12604-MFL-DRG ECF No. 161, PageID.7447 Filed 02/17/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marco A. Martinez, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

September 16,
2008

/s/MARCO A. MARTINEZ Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending May 30, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
###### Editorial Note on Part 8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49224, Sept. 25, 2009.

#### § 8.510 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Civil penalty* means a final assessment under the provisions of 33 CFR part 1, subpart 1.07 or part 20 of this chapter.

*Coast Guard SIP Advisor* means the Coast Guard marine inspector assigned by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), to assist in the development of an action plan.

*Company* means the owner of the vessel or any other organization or person, such as the manager or the bareboat charterer, who operates a vessel under the SIP.

*Company Action Plan (CAP)* means the document describing a company's organization, policies, and responsibilities required for participation in the SIP.

*Company SIP Agent* means the individual who is responsible for the Company Action Plan and the Vessel Action Plan development and implementation and who has the authority to bind the company to the terms of these plans.

*Correction Report* means a document which sets out specific vessel deficiencies and is used to record their correction by the company.

*Documented deficiency* means an incident documented in a Coast Guard record in which the condition of a vessel, its equipment, or its operation was not in compliance with Coast Guard regulations.

*Examination Checklist* means any document or form approved in the VAP, that may be used by company employees to record the periodic examinations required by the VAP.

*Inspection Criteria References (ICR)* means the individual pages in the VAP that list each item on the vessel required by regulation to be periodically inspected.

*Inspection Schedule and Verification (ISV)* means the document that lists the items to be inspected and the intervals for their inspection, and on which is recorded the completion of required examinations and tests conducted by designated company employees.

*Prototype SIP plan* means the SIP plans developed for a company or vessel participating in a Coast Guard District-or OCMI-endorsed SIP before August 18, 1998.

*Reportable casualty* means a marine casualty or accident required to be reported under 46 CFR part 4, subpart 4.05 of this chapter.

*Streamlined Inspection Program (SIP)* means the alternative inspection program set out in this subpart.

*Vessel Action Plan (VAP)* means the document that prescribes procedures for maintenance, examination, and inspection of a vessel enrolled in the SIP.
#### § 174.185 Intact stability.

(a) Each OSV must be shown by design calculations to meet, under each condition of loading and operation, the minimal requirements for metacentric height (GM) in § 170.170 of this chapter, and in either § 170.173 of this chapter or paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.

(b) The area under each righting arm curve must be at least 0.08 meter-radians (15 foot-degrees) up to the smallest of the following angles:

(1) The angle of maximum righting arm;

(2) The downflooding angle; or

(3) 40 degrees.

(c) The downflooding angle must not be less than 20 degrees.

(d) The righting arm curve must be positive to at least 40 degrees.

(e) The freeboard at the stern must be equal to the freeboard calculated to comply with subchapter E of this chapter or to the value taken from Table 174.185, whichever is less.

(f) For paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section, at each angle of heel an OSV's righting arm may be calculated considering either—

(1) The vessel is permitted to trim free until the trimming moment is zero; or

(2) The vessel does not trim as it heels.

(g) For the purpose of paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section, the method of calculating righting arms chosen must be the same for all calculations.

| LBP in meters (feet) | Freeboard at stern in millimeters (inches) |
| --- | --- |
| Less than 20 (65) | 300 (12) |
| 20 (65) but less than 30 (100) | 380 (15) |
| 30 (100) but less than 40 (130) | 400 (18) |
| 40 (130) but less than 50 (155) | 500 (20) |
| 50 (155) but less than 60 (190) | 560 (22) |
| 60 (190) but less than 70 (230) | 610 (24) |
| 70 (230) and greater | 660 (26) |

Table 174.185—Minimal Freeboard at the Stern