alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Michael L. Sarina, Chief Financial Officer of
      Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





|1. | The
              Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
              2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
              "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
              of the
              Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







**In
      Witness Whereof** ,
      the
      undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 11th day of August
      2006.








/s/
                Michael L. Sarina
              Michael
                L. Sarina
              Chief
                Financial Officer
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, March 13, 1995 (43), Para 43.1 Designation of Speaker Pro Tempore]
[Page 374]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.43.1  designation of speaker pro tempore

  The House was called to order by the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. JONES, 
who laid before the House the following communication:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                   March 13, 1995.
       I hereby designate the Honorable Walter B. Jones, Jr. to 
     act as Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                    Newt Gingrich,
                          Speaker of the House of Representatives.
```
#### § 32.75-15 Electric bonding and grounding for tanks—TB/ALL.

All independent cargo tanks in wood hull tank vessels shall be electrically bonded together with stranded copper cable of not less than No. 4B and S gage and one end of this cable shall be grounded to a copper or brass plate of not less than 2 square feet in area and one-sixteenth inch in thickness and this plate shall be securely fastened to the hull, on the outside, at a point where it shall be covered by water when the tank vessel is unloaded.
#### § 308.543 Cancellation.

Facultative war risk insurance is not subject to cancellation by the Assured unless the goods are not shipped within thirty (30) days following the effective date of binding, and then only if the policy is returned for cancellation.
#### William C. Ruger *et al., Respondents, v.*James J. Belden *et al.,*Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

*Per Curiam*.

Action for attorney’s services. The services were rendered in several different actions or proceedings, running through a period of six years. According to the affidavits on the part of the plaintiffs and the pleadings, the services were rendered under several separate retainers, and' the Special Term is deemed to have so held. The value of the services is put in issue by the pleadings, and the trial will involve the examination of a large number of items of service, with a view of determining the value of each. We think the action is referable.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August12, 2010   /s/ Teresa A. Herbert* Teresa A. Herbert Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Astrata Group  Incorporated
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Martin Euler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of
my  knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule  15d-14(b)  and 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to Astrata Group
Incorporated and will be retained by Astrata Group Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  October 17, 2005

                                                 /S/ MARTIN EULER
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name: Martin Euler
                                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 7 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

EDDIE JOE BUSH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MIKE VETRANO, JANE CRUZ, and

DAVID LINAM, Washington State

Officials,

 Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-1115

(D.C. 99-Z-177)

(District of Colorado)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

 

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BALDOCK , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
2

Plaintiff-Appellant Eddie Joe Bush filed a pro se civil rights complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a number of violations of his civil rights

by Colorado State Prison officials. However, the magistrate judge determined

that the complaint was deficient for failing to submit a Prisoner’s Motion and

Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The magistrate,

therefore, issued an order directing Mr. Bush to submit the proper documentation

required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) & (2). The order warned that if Mr. Bush

failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days, the action would be dismissed

without prejudice. 

Mr. Bush submitted an uncertified copy of his prisoner trust fund account

statement. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(2) requires a certified copy of the trust fund

account statement, or institutional equivalent. Therefore, on March 5, 1999, the

district court dismissed his claim without prejudice. The district court further

denied Mr. Bush’s motion and affidavit for leave to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis, finding that the appeal was not taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3). 

Mr. Bush has filed a motion in this court to proceed in forma pauperis for

this appeal, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), arguing that the uncertified

account statement he submitted was “the equivalent of certified.” Aplt’s Br. at 3. 

There is no equivalent of certification. The statute clearly requires a certified
3

copy. Mr. Bush’s appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke

v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989) (a claim is frivolous if the factual

contentions supporting it are “clearly baseless,” or if it relies on an “indisputably

meritless legal theory”). 

Accordingly, we DENY Mr. Bush leave to file in forma pauperis and

DISMISS his appeal. The dismissal of this frivolous appeal is a strike for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Jennings v. Natrona County Detention Ctr.

Med. Facility , 175 F.3d 775, 1999 WL 248634, at * 4 (10th Cir.1999). 

Entered for the Court,

Robert H. Henry

Circuit Judge
#### Joseph Quin, *Respondent, v.*The City of Buffalo, *Appellant*.

Motion for reargument denied.
§ 46.10-20 Application for the assignment and renewal of subdivision load lines. ( a ) Application for assignment and renewal of subdivision load lines and certification thereof shall be made in writing to the Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16769, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10077, July 12, 1968; CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34534, Sept. 7, 1988; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60147, Sept. 30, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-463, The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: DoD Task Force on the Future of Military Health 
Care, a Subcommittee of the Defense Health Board.
    Dates: February 6, 2007.
    Times: 1 p.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Location: National Transportation Safety Board Conference Center, 
429 L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC 20594.
    Agenda: The purpose of the meeting is to obtain, review, and 
evaluate information related to the Future of Military Health Care Task 
Force's congressionally-directed task to examine matters relating to 
the future of military health care. The Task Force members will receive 
briefings on topics related to the delivery of military health care. 
Additional information and meeting registration is available online at 
the Defense Health Board Web site, http://www.ha.osd.mil/dhb.
    Due to the Task Force co-chairs' decision to accelerate the next 
meeting of the Task Force, the Committee Management Office for the 
Department of Defense has authorized a waiver to the fifteen day 
notification requirement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colonel Christine Bader, Executive 
Secretary, Defense Health Board, Skyline One, 5205 Leesburg Pike, Suite 
810, Falls Church, VA 22041, (703) 681-3279, ext. 109. http://www.ha.osd.mil/dhb.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The session on February 6, 2007 will be open 
to the public in accordance with Section 552b(b) of Title 5, U.S.C., 
specifically subparagraph (1) thereof and Title 5, U.S.C., appendix 1, 
subsection 0(d). Open sessions of the meeting will be limited by spaced 
accommodations. Any interested person may attend, appear before or file 
statements with the Task Force at the time and in the manner permitted 
by the Task Force.

    Dated: January 18, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-277 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned officer of National Penn Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended  June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




Date:
            August
      8, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
      Michael R. ReinhardName:
            Michael
      R. ReinhardTitle:
            Treasurer
      and Chief Financial
Officer





The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not for any other
purpose.








42
#### In re Disqualification of Jackson. Kistler *v.*Kistler.

[Cite as *In re Disqualification of Jackson*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1233.]

(No. 98-AP-147

Decided December 29, 1998.)

*1234Moyer, C.J.

This affidavit of disqualification filed by defendant Victor Nial Kistler seeks the disqualification of Judge S. Farrell Jackson from further proceedings regarding the above-captioned case.

I note that this is the third affidavit of disqualification filed by affiant in this case since March 1998. The two previous affidavits (98-AP-039 and 98-AP-128) were found not well taken and were denied. In addition, affiant filed a motion for reconsideration in 98-AP-128, which was overruled, and has submitted numerous letters relative to his claim of bias and prejudice against Judge Jackson.

In his most recent filing, affiant alleges “[n]ew serious abuses by the Judge” and attaches two letters in support of his claim. Affiant’s allegations are nothing more than a restatement of the claims made in his prior affidavits and numerous communications with this court, all of which relate to legal rulings made by Judge Jackson and the quality of legal representation received by affiant. As stated in previous rulings, these allegations do not support a finding of bias, prejudice, or other disqualifying interest. Accordingly, this affidavit of disqualification is found not well taken and is denied. The case shall proceed before Judge Jackson.

Affiant is reminded that “[t]he statutory right to seek disqualification of a judge is an extraordinary remedy not to be invoked in a frivolous manner [and] * * * the filing of repeated affidavits of disqualification can result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions.” (Citations omitted.) See *In re Disqualification of Millard*(1992), 74 Ohio St.3d 1235, 1236, 657 N.E.2d 1343, 1344. While affiant legitimately may question the legal rulings made by Judge Jackson in the underlying case, the appropriate forum to raise this question is appellate review and not the filing of repeated affidavits of disqualification and other communications with the Supreme Court. Affiant may be liable for sanctions should he file another affidavit of disqualification that raises issues more appropriately addressed in another forum.
----

| Attest:               | By:    | /s/ Stephen J.      Benedetti                                                                 |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Its:   | Executive Vice President, Chief      Operating                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| /s/ Alison G. Griffin |   | Officer and Chief Financial      Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHNNIE STANLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY BARBARA

MCQUADE,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 15-cv-12269

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (document no. 8)

On June 22, 2015, Plaintiff Johnnie Stanley, a pro se prisoner, filed a complaint

against the above-named Defendants, claiming violations of criminal procedure and his

Sixth Amendment rights. Compl., ECF No. 1. The Court referred the case to Magistrate

Judge Patricia T. Morris on July 29. Order, ECF No. 5. On July 30, Stanley was granted

permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Orders, ECF Nos. 6, 7.

Magistrate Judge Morris issued her Report and Recommendation on August 14. The

report noted that Stanley has had three civil actions dismissed for failing to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted. Rep. at 3, ECF No. 8. Accordingly, under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g), the Court must deny Stanley the privilege of proceeding without prepayment of

fees, and require payment of the filing fee.

Under Civil Rule 72(b), each party had fourteen days from the date of service to file

any written objections to the recommended disposition. Neither party has filed any

objections. De novo review of the magistrate judge’s findings is therefore not required. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2)–(3) (mandating de novo review only if the parties “serve and file

2:15-cv-12269-SJM-PTM Doc # 12 Filed 09/01/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 204
specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations”). The Court has

reviewed the file and the Report, and finds that the magistrate judge’s analysis is proper.

Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report’s findings and conclusions, and will enter an

appropriate judgment.

ORDER

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation (document no. 8) is ADOPTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must pay the entire filing fee by September

30, 2015, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III 

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge

Dated: September 1, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on September 1, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-12269-SJM-PTM Doc # 12 Filed 09/01/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 205
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               9
<CIK>                               0000826491
<NAME>                             FIRST GEORGIA HOLDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           2,543
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,352
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,181
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        110,432
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,742
<DEPOSITS>                                     106,528
<SHORT-TERM>                                       192
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,859
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,948
<COMMON>                                         1,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 132,742
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,872
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  507
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   248
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,626
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,346
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,407
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,219
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      214
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,049
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,135
<LOANS-PAST>                                       129
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   983
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      278
<RECOVERIES>                                        85
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1004
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1004
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>