alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Peter Limeri, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of PRG-Schultz International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       By: /s/ PETER LIMERI         Peter LimeriMarch 21 , 2007   *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer*    *(Principal Financial Officer)*
#### The State ex rel. Shelton et al., Appellants, *v.*Firemen & Policemen’s Death Benefit Fund et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Shelton v. Firemen & Policemen’s Death Benefit Fund*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 1242.]

(No. 98-66

Submitted December 16, 1998

Decided February 10, 1999.)

*Baumgartner & O’Toole, L.P.A.,*and *Daniel D. Mason,*for appellants.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Darius N. Kandawalla,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

The appeal is dismissed, *sua sponte,*as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 1, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK  | * 18C* Branch  | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to merge with Fifth Third Bank, Grand Rapids, MI and incident thereto establish branches.                    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|FIFTH THIRD BANK  | * 18C* Branch  | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to merge with Fifth Third Bank, National Association, Nashville, TN and incident thereto establish branches. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 111 (Monday, June 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 32099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing a Partially Open Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, June 13, 2007. The closed portion of 
the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status: The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. 
The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matter to be Considered at the Open Portion: Final Rule: Financial 
Interests for Appointive Directors.

Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion: Periodic Update of 
Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.

Contact Person for More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa8d939696938989ba9c929c98d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82f5ebeeeeebf1f1c2e4eae4e0ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 6, 2007.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Neil R. Crowley,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-2890 Filed 6-6-07; 4:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 197.436 Liveboating. ( a ) During liveboating operations, the person-in-charge shall insure that— ( 1 ) Diving is not conducted in seas that impede station-keeping ability of the vessel;
( 2 ) Liveboating operations are not conducted— ( i ) From 1 hour after sunset to 1 hour before sunrise; or
( ii ) During periods of restricted visibility;
( 3 ) The propellers of the vessel are stopped before the diver enters or exits the water; and
( 4 ) A boat is ready to be launched with crew in the event of an emergency.
( b ) As used in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, *restricted visibility* means any condition in which vessel navigational visibility is restricted by fog, mist, falling snow, heavy rainstorms, sandstorms or any other similar causes.
( c ) During liveboating operations, the diving supervisor shall insure that— ( 1 ) Diving is not conducted at depths greater than 220 fsw;
( 2 ) Diving is not conducted in seas that impede diver mobility or work function;
( 3 ) A means is used to prevent the diver's hose from entangling in the propellers of the vessel;
( 4 ) Each diver carries a reserve breathing gas supply;
( 5 ) A standby diver is available while a diver is in the water;
( 6 ) Diving is not conducted with in-water decompression times greater than 120 minutes; and
( 7 ) The person-in-charge is notified before a diver enters or exits the water.
#### State *v.*Dearborn.

Any fact is relevant, on the question of a prisoner’s guilt, which supplies a motive for the criminal act charged.

Indictment, for obstructing the Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad. As tending to prove a motive, the state, against the *349exception of the defendant, were permitted to show that the defendant had been twice arrested on criminal charges at the instance and on the complaint of the Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad, once about four years and once about a year before the act charged in the indictment. The defendant was convicted and sentenced, and this bill of exceptions allowed.

*Pike 8f Parsons,*for the defendant.

*Solicitor,*for the state.

Foster, J.

When there is a question whether any act was ■done by any person, any fact is relevant to the issue which supplies a motive for such an act. Steph. Dig. Ev., Art. 7. The question is, whether A murdered B. The facts, that at the instigation of A, B murdered C twenty-five years before B’s murder, and that A at or before that time used expressions showing malice against C, are deemed to be relevant, as showing a motive on A’s part to murder B. *Rex*v. *Clewes,*4 Car. & P. 221. The question is, whether A burned a certain building. The fact that A had excessive insurance upon the building is relevant, as showing that A had a motive to destroy it. *State*v. *Cohn,*9 Nev. 179; *Com.*v. *McCarthy,*119 Mass. 354;-see, also, *State*v. *Lapage,*57 N. H. 245, 294. 295. These are common illustrations of what must be regarded as an elementary proposition.

It is undoubtedly true that a motive is never required to be shown in order to establish the fact of a person’s guilt, “ because the motives of men are so various as to defy calculation ” (Steph. Or. L. 88); but it is also true that the absence of any apparent motive is always a fact in favor of the accused. What could have been his motive? is a question the pertinency of which will never be a matter of dispute; and so the existence of a motive becomes an important element in a chain of presumptive proof. Best Prin. Ev. 571, 572. The influences of good or ill will are constantly considered in estimating the probability of the guilt of a person charged with a malicious act. The absence or presence of motive renders the alleged fact less or more probable. In the present case, evidence tending to show a motive stimulated by revenge was clearly admissible.

*Exception overruled.*

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Partners
WAMCO Partnerships:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Numbers 333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and
333-09485) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated July 20, 2007, with respect to the combined balance sheets of
the WAMCO Partnerships as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related combined statements of operations, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation. Our
report was unqualified and included an explanation paragraph that described the Company's adoption of Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements, as of December 31,
2006, as discussed in Note 1 to the combined financial statements.

KPMG
LLP

Dallas,
Texas
July 20, 2007

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11

EXHIBIT 1 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

(in thousands, except per share amounts,
adjusted for 3-for-2 stock split declared January 21, 1997)


                                             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                           ------------------------------------
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                   1996        1995        1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computation Required by Regulation S-K
 and for Statement of Income (Note 1):

Net income ..............................  $    7,127  $   12,493  $    2,255

Weighted average number of common and 
  common equivalent shares outstanding:
  Common shares .........................   6,810,215   6,603,885   6,647,252
  Dilutive effect of stock option shares
   (Note 2) .............................      19,017      22,667      37,404
                                           ------------------------------------
  Total common and 
    common equivalent shares ............   6,829,232   6,626,552   6,684,656

Earnings per share - primary ............  $     1.05  $     1.89  $     0.34
                                           ====================================





                                             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                           ------------------------------------
FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE               1996        1995        1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computation Required by Regulation S-K
 and for Statement of Income (Note 1):

Net income ..............................  $    7,127  $   12,493  $    2,255

Weighted average number of common and 
  common equivalent shares outstanding:
  Common shares .........................   6,810,215   6,603,885   6,647,252
  Dilutive effect of stock option shares
   (Note 2) .............................      19,017      24,624      42,147
                                           ------------------------------------
  Total common and 
    common equivalent shares ............   6,829,232   6,628,509   6,689,399

Earnings per share - fully diluted ......  $     1.05  $     1.89  $     0.34
                                           ====================================



Note 1: See the Consolidated Statements of Income for Earnings per share 
        computations on page 5 of the Corporation's 1996 Annual Report to 
        Stockholders contained herein as Exhibit 2.

Note 2: The dilutive effect of common share equivalents was determined by 
        the treasury stock method.  See Note 11 in Notes to 
        Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 15 and 16 of the 
        Corporation's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders contained herein 
        as Exhibit 2.
#### Edward Brousseau, *Respondent, v.*George S. Shultz, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs, without prejudice to. defendant’s right to apply for leave to answer on terms. Mem. by

Boardman, J.
# Q 0(K i

U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Novembe r

12 , 200 9 WilliamElder , Esq . Hogan & Hartso n Columbi aSquar e 55 5 ThirteenthSt. , N W Washington , D C 2000 4 (fa x no . 202-637-5910 ) J . Ernes t Baird , Esq . Dary l M . Williams , Esq . Baird , William s & Greer , LL P 6225N . 24" ^ Street , Suit e 12 5 Phoenix , AZ8501 6 (fa x no . 602-271-9308 ) Re ; Valle y Aviatio n Services , v . Cit y o f Glendal e FA A Docke t

No . 16-09-0 6 Dea r Messrs . Elde r

an dWilliams : C 5

- ' J C D

Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("FAA" ) receive dth e Valle y Aviatio n Services ' writte n reques t fo r a3 0 day extensio n o f

tim e i n whic ht o file aRebutta l t o th e Complainant' s Reply . Base do n counsel' s representatio n tha t ther e i s n o oppositio n t o th e reques t an dbase dupo n goo d caus e show n o f

further tim e require dt o revie w lat e fileddeposition s i n arelate dmatter , th e FA A hereb y grant s th e reques t for a n extensio n unti l Decembe r 11 , 2009 . Sincerel y I'mon dVeatc h Attorney , Airport

Law (AGC-610 ) Airport an dEnvironmenta l La w Divisio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Roo m900- E Washington , D.C . 2059 1 (202 ) 267-319 9 (office ) (202 ) 267-967 6 (direct ) (202 ) 267-576 9 (fax )
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2300]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on May 
10, 2007, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> April 12, 2007 (Open and Closed).

B. New Business--Reports

    <bullet> FCS Young, Beginning, and Small Farmer Mission 
Performance--2006 Results.
    <bullet> Mission-Related Investments--2006 Annual Report.
    <bullet> OE Quarterly Report.

Closed Session*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> OE Supervisory Activities.

    Dated: May 4, 2007.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 07-2300 Filed 5-4-07; 1:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
§ 4.06-1 Responsibilities of the marine employer. ( a ) At the time of occurrence of a marine casualty, a discharge of oil into the navigable waters of the United States, a discharge of a hazardous substance into the navigable waters of the United States, or a release of a hazardous substance into the environment of the United States, the marine employer shall make a timely, good faith determination as to whether the occurrence currently is, or is likely to become, a serious marine incident.
( b ) When a marine employer determines that a casualty or incident is, or is likely to become, a serious marine incident, the marine employer shall take all practicable steps to have each individual engaged or employed on board the vessel who is directly involved in the incident chemically tested for evidence of drug and alcohol use as required in this part.
( c ) The marine employer determines which individuals are directly involved in a serious marine incident (SMI). A law enforcement officer may determine that additional individuals are directly involved in the SMI. In these cases, the marine employer must take all practical steps to have these additional individuals tested according to this part.
( d ) The requirements of this subpart do not prevent personnel who are required to be tested from performing duties in the aftermath of an SMI when their performance is necessary to respond to safety concerns directly related to the incident.
( e ) The marine employer shall ensure that all individuals engaged or employed on board a vessel are fully indoctrinated in the requirements of this subpart, and that appropriate vessel personnel are trained as necessary in the practical applications of these requirements.
[CGD 86-067, 53 FR 47078, Nov. 21, 1988, as amended by USCG-2000-7759, 66 FR 42967, Aug. 16, 2001; USCG-2001-8773, 70 FR 75960, Dec. 22, 2005]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40981

LARRY D. McINNIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ERASMO E. BRAVO ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-345

- - - - - - - - - - April 7, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry D. McInnis, Texas prisoner #651075, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on his appeal from the district court’s order assessing the district-court filing fees required by the Prison Litigation Act of 1995, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). His motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. McInnis paid an initial partial district-court filing fee of more than the district court ordered him to pay. His appeal fromNo. 96-40981 - 2 - the district court’s order therefore is moot, and we lack jurisdiction to consider his contention that the district court’s order was erroneous. Rocky v. King , 900 F.2d 864, 866-67 (5th Cir. 1990). APPEAL DISMISSED.