# .. STATE OFWASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OFECOLOGY
1N THEMATTER OF APPROVING A 

### NEW CONTAMJNANTSOURCEFOR 

### ffiP,lNC.

TO: RayMcGaugh, PlantManager 

### ffiP, inc.**~P.O.** Box 4239 Pasco, W A 99301 ) ) ) ORDER No. 02AQER-5074

TheIBP, inc. (IBP) Pasco facility requested an emission limitation in a submittal 

### dated December 21, 2001. Theplantis locatedin the Wallula serious particulate non-attainment area. and any facility within the area withpotential to emitparticulate emissions aboVe 70tonsperyearis

. considered a major source. The facility currentlyhas a potential toemit in excess of70 tons per year ofparticulate. Toremain below Title V threshold levelstheIBPfac1litj/has .tequested production limits on blooddrying, inedible rendering, andediblerendering, and has proposed a particulate limit**below~70** tons per year. Since the area maybere-designated within several 

### years, it is anticipated thatIBPmayrequest a change toparticulate emissions limitations from 70to I00 · tons

### per

### year.
IBP has identifiedprocess equipment that was installed atthefacility without Notice of Construction (NOC) approval, and_has submittedNOC applications forthe equipment. Air pollution control has been 

### proposed for facility 

### process equipment. IBP

### will install a new venturi scrubber, a new spraychamberscrubber, a new packed bed scrubber, and a new cyclone. IBP will rebuild and modifythe existingpacked bed scrubberand repiace the existing venturi scrubber.
The AQPissued NOC approval 

### OrderNo. DE 94AQ-E159 on July 28, 1994for theinstallation of theDuskedryer and the7tb inediblerendering linecooker. IBP reported that theDuske dryer did notmeetthe emission limitation as specifiedin theNOC approval, andproposes to install a venturi scrubber with a wetcyclonefilterto control particulateemissions. This approval orderboth rescinds and sueercedesNOC approval OrderNo. DE94AQ-E159.
The purpc)se ofthis NOC approval orderis to: I. Require a particulate emission limitation below 70tons peryear. 2. Rescind and supercede NOC approval OrderNo. DE 94AQ-E159 for the Duske dryer and 7tb inedible rendering line cooker. 3. Issue an approval orderfor emission controls andprocess equipment that were not originally permitted under state 

### airquality regulations.
In relation to the above, the Department ofEcology, State ofWashington, pursuant to RCW

. 70.94.152,RCW 70.94.153, andWAC 173-400-110, makes the foJJowing determinations:
1. The proposed project ifconstructed and operated as herein required wiJJ be in accordance with applicable rules andregulations as set forth in Chapters 173-400WAC and 173-460 WAC, and facility operation will not resultin violations to ambient air quality standards.1- IBP, 

### inc. Order No. 02AQER·5074 Page 2 of 10 December 6, 2002


### 2. The proposed project ifconstructed and operated as required will provide all known, available, and**~asonable** 

### methods ofemission control, i.e., best**availabl~** 

### control technology (BACT).


### I. FINDINGS: 1. LAWS AND REGULATIONS
The proposal by ffiP to operate a beefprocessing facility that includes blood drying, edible and inedible rendering, and associated processes shall comply with all requirements in: ·. 1.1 Chapter70.94 Revised Code ofWashington (RCW), Washington Clean Air Act. 1.2 Chapter 173-400 Washington Administrative Code (WAC), General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources.

.. 1.3 Chapter 173-460 WAC, Controls for New Sources ofToxic AirPollutants. Specifically, the ffiP proposal to install new sources ofair pollution is regulated under:
1.4 WAC 173-400-110, New source review (NSR). 1.5 WAC 173-400-112, Requirements for sources in**U:onattainme~t** 

### areas. 1.6 WAC 173-460-040, New source review.**Al~** 

### state and federal regulations, statutes, and laws referenced in this order are the 

### current version upon the date ofissuance ofthis Order. · 2. ESTIMATED EMISSIONS
ffiP currentlyoperates a beefprocessing facility and proposes to permit existing processing equipmentand add new airpollution controls. Operation ofthe processingequipment with restricted annual production rates and air pollution controls as contained in this Order has the potential to prodqce the foUowing estimated annual particulate emissions:

TABLE 1: ESTIMATED EMISSIONS AND CONTROLEQUIPMENT · # 

### Emission points 

### PM10* Control equipment 1 Control equipment 2 2.1 Raw blood tank 1.24 

### Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.2 Blood centrifuge Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.3 Dry Blood cyclone separators· Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.4 Blood dryerroom air 1 Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.5 Blood dryer room air 2 Packed bed 1 na 2.6 Inediblecookers 1-7 Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.7 Flotation centrifuge Spray chamber filter Packed bed 

### 1 2.8 Hides centrifuge Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.9 Flotation skimming tank Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 

### .



# I

# .. IBP. inc. Page 3 of 10 

### Order No. 02AQER-5074 December 6, 2002 

### 2.10 Flotation room air 1 Spray chamber filter Packed bed 

### 1 2.11 Flotation room air 2 · Packed bed 1 na 2.12 

### Hides fleshing tank Spray chamber filter Packed bed 1 2.13 Inedible rotex screen 3.97 Cyclone & Venturi 1 Packed bed2 2.14 Inedible hammermilJ Cyclone & Venturi 1 Packed bed 2
!J 

### 2.15 MiHingroom air Packedbed2 na 2.16 Flotation celJ tanks Venturi 1. Packed bed 2 2.17 Dupps pressors Venturi 1 Packed bed2 2.18 Grease centrifuge Venturi 1 Packed bed2 2.19 Inedible rendering room 1 Venturi 1 Packed bed 2 2.20 Inedible rendering room 2 Packed bed 2 na 2.21 Duske dryer 4.10 Venturi 2

. Wetcytlone filter 2.22 Edible rotex screen 2.47 na na 2.23 Inedible silo 0.53 na na 2.24 Packaging vacuum pumps 0.61 SmogHogESP na 2.25 Lo Pro

### roof airlock 0.61 na na 2.26 Lo Pro 

### storage bins 0.24 na na · 2.27 Boilers 2.83 na 

### . na 2.28 Back-up fire pump• 0.09 na na 2.29 Spinal vacuum pump 0.16 na na 2.30 Sani-vacs 0.48 na na 2.31 Heaters 1.08 na na 2.32 Propane only heaters 0.13 na na 2.33 Steam pasteurization cabinet. 1.01 na na 2.34 Post-pasteurization acid cab 0.12 na na 2.35 PEC cabinet 1.67 na na 2.36 Carcass wash acid cabinet 0.79 na na 2.37 Blood silo 0.10 dust bag filter na Total PM 10 

### emissions 22.23 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 2.38 Gel Bone truck Joadout 0.22 tpy estimated 2.39 Inedible rail loadout 0.42 tpy estimated 2.40 Inedible truck loadout 1.34 tpy**estimat~**
.. 

# .I

## ' IDP, 

### inc. Page4 of lO 

### Order: No. 02AQER.:.5074 December 6, 2002 2.41 Bloodtruckloadout 0.26 tpy

### estimated 2.42 Paved roads 0.35 tpy estimated 2.43 Salt rail loadout 8.06 tpy estimated *All particulate 1s constdered PM10 and 1s measured m tons per year. Process emtsstons only counted towards total emissions, fugitive emissions estimated but not counted in total. 

### 3. BACT Washington Administrative Code 173-400-112(2)(b) requires the use ofBest Available Control Technology (BACT) to control emissions ofcriteria pollutants. Table 1 identifies each process component and work area that will exhaust to air pollution control equipment at the facility. Information on the air pollution control equipment that constitutes BACT is provided below. 3.1 Packed bed scrubber 1 controls particulate emis.sions and odors from rendering, blood, and hide processing areas, and exhausts to the ambient air. Spray chamberfilter is used upstream ofpacked bed 

### scrubber 1 to reduce particulate emission concentrations to tpe packed bed. Packed bed 

### scrubbers 1 and 2 both use a water based liquor utilizingeither a 10% solution of sodilDJl hypochlorite to 

### oxidize odorants and a 50% 

### solution ofsodium hydroxide (caustic) to maintain a pHofgreater than 8, orchlorine dioxide to maintain a chlorine residual ofgreater than 25 ppmw, and art exhaust air stream temperature ofless than 120° F. Scrubber liquoris re- . circulated, and makeup water and chemicals are added to maintain volume and operating · specifications. 3.2 Packed bed scrubber 2 (rebuilt) controls particulate emissions andodors from rendering, blood, and hide areas, andexhausts to the ambient air. Venturi scrubber 1 is used upstream of packed bed 

### scrubber 2 to**JFC~uce** 

### particulate emission concentrations to the system. The Cyclone is used upstreamofthe venturi scrubberto control particulate emission concentrations from the Inedible Rotex Screen and the Inedible Hammennill. 3.3 The SmogHog is used to control oil that

# is discharged from eleven (11) Beach Russ vacuum · pumps that are used to evacuate the chambers in the cryovac packaging machines. The Smog Hog consists ofa reuseable aluminum mesh filter, an ioni'zer section that contains tungsten wires, a collecting cell**~ith** 

### parallel aluminum plates, and an aluminum mesh after filter. 3.4The Duske dryer is vented to venturi scrubber 2 and wetcyclone filter to control particulate. The Duske dryer exhaust air will 

### vary between 16,000 and 20,000 scfm. Plant air will be.

### used to balance the flow at 20,000 scfm to venturi scrubber 2 and cool the Duske dryer exhaust gases. Immediately downstream from venturi scrubber 2 is second stage 26,000 scfm wet cyclone filter. Plant air will be 

### used to supplement the venturi scrubber exhaust to the wet · cyclone filter. TABLE 2: BESTAVAIT...ABLE CONTROLTECHNOLOGYFOR PARTICULATE ; # 

### Control equipment Air flow Liquor flow Delta P Control effie. 3.1 Packed bed 

### scrubber 1 42,000 scfm >400gpm <5"WC 95%@ SCPControl, Inc RAS-42 >25 ppm Cl 0.5 urn* pH>8 Spray chamber filter 24,000 scfm >250 gpm <3" 

## we 95%@ St;P Col'\trot,Inc SC-24 l.um 

# ' '·,::; ''

# ,... ffiP, inc. Page 5 of 10 OrderNo. 02AOER-5074 December 6, 2002 3.2 Packed- bed scrubber 2 75,000 scfm >700 gpm <5"

## we 95%@ SCP Control, Inc RAS-75 >25 ppmCI 0.5um pH>8 Venturi scrubber I 10,000 scfm >40gpm >4"WC 95%@ SCP Control, Inc VS-10 Sum Cyclone, high efficiency 2,000 scfm na >5"WC 85%@ SCP Control, Inc CS-2.0 Sum 3.3 Smog Hog SH 50 PE-S-T 2500 to5400 electrostatic precipitator 95% United Air Specialists, Inc scfm
3.4 Duske Dryer VentUri 20,000scfm >80gpm >5

.. WC 95%@ scrubber2 

### Sum SCP Control, Inc VS-20 '

.- 

### " "- DuskeDryerWet Cyclone 26,000scfm >200gpm <3"WC 95%@ filter 0.5um ' 

### . SCP Control,**IncWCF~26** 

## * urn used as the abbreviation for mtcrometer ornncron



# ... ··lfiWJ't' {)peHtieft eftft8 JJf9GIS& B'fuipHHJRl i"eRQfild

### iA tJH& 9f4eF

### tlJiiJ R9l 

### Fesy.)t in aJB9i8At airEjt*llity emis1ioas oftoxie airpollutants (TAP) above acceptak-le 11ource**imp~~:t** le'I•Js**~as** 

### cgataiABd iA Chii}Mr 1'78 490WA€:. 

### 5. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS 5.1 Equipment substitutions orreplacements shall bereported to Ecology in writing prior to installation. A NOC application will be required ifequipment substitution orreplacement results in an increase in production rate oran increase in any airpollutantemission rates. 5.2 The air f)ow for each individual piece ofequipment andprocess area that is routed to an air pollution control device has been identified in-the NOC application.· Any increase in airflow above rates identified in this approval Order shall be reported to Ecology fn

_ writing prior to modification. 5.3 Particulate emissionsfrom the Duske dryer airpo1lution control exhaust stack were modeled usingTSCREEN, an United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved screeningmodel. A particulate matter emission concentration of0.010 grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf) for the scrubberexhaust stack was modeled and found to be well below the limits contained in Chapter 173-470WAC. It is assumed that the impacts from particulate matter generated bypacked bed scrubbers I and 2 are comparable to the Duske dryer scrubber. Cumulative particulate impacts ofthese three pollution control devices remain below state ambient air quality standards. 

### THEREFORE, IT IS 

### ORDERED that the project as described in said Notice of Construction and more specifically detailed in plans, specifications and other information submitted to the Department of Ecology in reference thereto, is approved for construction, installation and operation, provided the following conditions are met:

# I·

. , ffiP, inc. Page 6of 10 December 6, 2002 Order No. 02AQER-5074 II. APPROVAL CONDITIONS: 

### 1. OPERATING LIMITATIONS 1.1 mP has requested voluntary operating limitations under WAC 173-400-091 to restrict particulate emissions below 70 tons per year. The Wallula serious non-attainment area may be redesignated. At that time IDP may request a change to particulate emissions limitations from 70 to 100 tons per year. Rend(!ring and blood drying operations will be limited by restricting finished product throughput and hours ofoperation as follows:

TABLE 3: OPERATINGLIMITATION 1.1 Operation Hourly Limit Annual Limit Comments 1.1.1 Blood drying 1600 lbs/hr 5990 tons/yr 10% moisture product 1.1.2 Edible rendering 13,200 lbs/hr 49,421 tons/yr Gel bone 

# .. 1.1.3 Inedible rendering 6114lbslhr 22,891 tons/yr Lo pro, crax, tallow 1.1.4 Blood drying & rendering na 7488 hrs/yr na

1.2 Each emission unit will be controlled by the air pollution equipll'\ent specified in J'able 1 unde.r the nnding.

. . . 1.3 Air pollution control equipment will be required to operate underthe specificationsas listed inTable 2 underthe findings. ·· 1.4 All process and fugitive emission points contained in this approval order shall comply

· with the applicable requirements contained in 

### 1. Laws and Regulations underthe

findings. 

### 2.

. GENERAL PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PerformanceTesting

- Within 270 days afterissuance ofthis Approval OrderffiP shall conductilii.tial performance 40 CFR 60 Appendix A Method 5 andMethod 202 particulate testing andMethod 9 visible emission testing for the Duske Dryerexhaust and provide a written 

### report within 45 days. 2.3 Throughput duringTesting . - During testing the Duske dryer shall be operated at or near rated finish productcapacity. Failure to test at or'nearrated finish productcapacity will result in operational limits placed on the Duske dryer based on the production rate during the initial perfoimance testing. 2.4 PerformanceTestPlan Submittal - A test plan that includes a description ofthe reference test methods shall be submitted for Ecology's approval at least 30 days prior to any performance testing. 2.5 Testing

### Logistics

- The permittee shall provide sampling ports, safe sampling platforms, safe access to sampling platforms, and. utilities for sampling and testing. 2.7 Baseline Operating Parameters

- During testing, the following facility baseline operating parameters shall be recorded: 2.7.1 Duske dryer production rate. 2

..7.2 Duske dryer venturi and wet cyclone filter differential pressures. 2.7.3

## ~us~e**dryer.J~u~** and

## w~t**cyclo~ tilt~:** **~~~~r- ~ow**  r•..ffiP, inc. Order No. 02AQER-5074 

### 3. EMISSION LIMITS & 

### TEST METHODS Page 7 of 10 December 6, 2002

3.1 The particulate matter (PM1o) Method 5 and Method 202 concentration from the packed bed scrubber 1, packed bed scrubber 2, Smog hog, and wet cyclone filter exhaust stack shall be less than orequal to 

### 0.010 grains of

### PM1oper 

### dry standard cubic foot. The baseline operating parameters recorded during the initial performance testing for the wet cyclone filter will be used to establish operating parameters for the airpollution control

1 systems. 3.2 Visible emissions shall be no more than 

### 10% opacity 

### as measured by 

### 40 CFR 60 Appendix A Method 9 from any process emission point at the facility. Visjble emissions from fugitive dust sources shall not leave the property boundaries. 

### 3.3 Od6r frem 

### paelred eeEI 

### sembbeFS 1 aREI2 

### e:d!aYst gases shall be 

### sentFel1eEll:Jy using a wawr9as8d 

### Jiquor uulizing eitber 

### a 10% solutio:A of sodium b)q)OCbloJ.:ite to oxidia8 

### elileFaRts and a 

### 5Q% sol\IUQR of&odium**bydl:o;~~;ide (~au&ti~)**  to**mai~~ai:A** aFJ of**S~Cater** tban S, 

### or**~blorine** dioxide to maintain a cbloJ.:ine residual ofgreater tban 

### 25 ppmw, 

### and m exba:Yst air swam tempeAtw:e ofless 

### than 129° R 3. 

### TES1' METHODS & 

### EMISSION LIMITS .• POaUTANT 

### LIMIT TESTMETHOD NOTES 3.1.1 PM1o Fronthalf 0.010 gr/dscf EPA MethodS Filterable PM1o 3.1.2 PM1o Backhalf EPA Method 202 Condensable PM10 3.2.1 Visible emissions 10% opacity EPAMetho(l9 na 3.3.1 Odor na na Operating limits



### 4. 

### O&MMANUAL A site-specific O&M manual shall be developed and followed for the non-fugitive process emission points contained in this approval order. The O&M manual shall include information on all airpollution1controls, monitoring equipment, and any otherequipment that has the potential to affect emissions to the annosphere. Manufacturer's specifications and operating instructions should be included in the O&M manual. The O&M manual shall be updated to reflect 

### any modifications ofthe facility orits operating procedures. The O&M manual shall at a minimum include:
4.1 Normal operating parameters for the process and air pollution control equipment, including the most recent baseline operating parameters as identified during perfonnance testing. 4.2 A maintenance schedule for process and air pollution control equipment. 4.3 Recordkeeping requirements for process and air pollution control equipment as contained in Approval Condition 5, MONITORING and RECORDKEEPING. 4.4 A description ofthe mon_itoring instrumentation.

. 4.5 Quality assurance procedures for maintaining accuracy ofthe monitoring equipment.
IBP shall provide written notification to Ecology ofO&M manuaJ completion within 90 days

. after installation ofall the control systems identified in this approval Order.IBP, inc. Order No. 02AQER-5074
5. MONITORING and RECORDKEEPING Page 8 of 10 December 6, 2002

Monitoring instrumentation shall be installed and maintained for accuracy for the air pollution control equipment listed in Table 2. At a minimum, monitors shall include differential pressure and scrubber liquor flow rates as applicable for all air pollution control equipment. Packed bed scn.tbber I and 2·1iquor shall be monitored for temperature, pH (hydrogen ion activity), and oxidation reduction activity. All monitoring equipment shall be described in the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) manual. Specific records shall be kept on-site and made available for inspection by Ecologyupon request. The records shall be readily accessible, compiled in an organized manner and cover a minimum ofthe most recent 60-months. The records to be kept shall include the following: 5.1 Annual production records to verify that operating rates remain at orbelow the -restrictions contained in Table 

### 3 ofthis approval order. "' 5.2 Air pollution control parameters shall berecorded, including djff.erential pressure and scrubber liquorflow rates as applicable for all airpollution control equipment contained in this approval order. These parameters shall be recorded at least twice per shift during plant operations. 

### 5.3 Packed bed scrubber liquorparameters for both packed bed S<frubber 

### 1 and 

### 2 shall be continuouslymonitored. The scrubber liquor shall be monitored by a temperature gauge, hydrogen ion activity (pH) probe, and oxidation**reduc~on** activity probe (ORP). 5.4 Nature and details ofany upset condition orothersituation (date/time, duration, cause, etc.) that results in the facility being operated while the air pollution control

. equipmentwas not functioning properly, including upsets in scrubber liquor parameters. 

### 5.5 All performance testing results and reports. 

### 5.6. O&M manual and maintenance records. 

### 6. REPORTING 

# ' All reports and notifications shall be sent within 30 days following the end ofthe calendaryear unless otherwise noted below to:

6.1 6.2 Air Quality Program Washington State Department ofEcology 4601 N. Monroe Spokane, W A 99205-1295 Annual production 

### rates as required in APPROVAL CONDmON 5.1. Annual emission invent9ry as required by the Ecology Air Quality Program Registration Program. Note: The information requested under 6.1 and 6.2 may be combined and submitted in a single report. 6.3 The results ofany performance testing shall be sent to the above address no later than 45 days following such testing. 

# ! t 

# 1

# I I 

# I IBP, inc. 

### Order No. 02AQER-5074 

### 7. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Page 9 

### of 10 December 6, 2002 

### Fugitive dust control measures have not been prescribed in this order. Failure to maintain adequate fugitive dust control wiJJ result in Ecology requiring a fugitive dust control plan (FDCP) for all fugitive dust sources at the facility. 

### 8. GENERAL CONDITIONS 8.1 Visible Emissions

- No visible emissions shall be 

### allowed beyond the property line. 8.2 • Discontinuing Operations

- This approval shall become void ifoperation ofthe facility is discmitinued for a period ofeighteen (18) months. 8.3 Compliance AssuranceAccess

- Access to the source by EPA orEcology shall be 

### allowed for the purposes ofcompliance assurance inspections. Failure to allow access is grounds forrevocation ofthis Approval Order approving the NOC application. 8.4 Availability ofApproval Order and O&MManual

- Legible copies ofthis Approval Order approving the NOC applications and the O&M manual shall be available to employees in direct operation ofthe facility and its associated airpoJlutiori controls and be available for review upon request byEcology. 8.5 Equipment Operation

- Operation ofthe facility and its associated air pollution controls shBil be 

### conducted in compliance with all data and specifications submitted as part ofthe 

### NOCapplication and in accordance with the O&M manual, unless otherwise approved in'writingbyEcology. Emissions that result from failbre to follow the requirements ofthe O&Mmanual ormanufactu!er's instructions will be 

### considered proof that the 

### facility was not properly operated and/01" maintained. 8.6 · Obligations under OtherLaws orRegulations

- Nothingin this Approval Ordershall be

### construed to relieve mP ofits obligations under any local, state orfederal laws or regulations. 8.7 Fees

- PerWAC 173-400-116, this Approval Orderand related regulatoryrequirements have a fee associated forreview and issuance. This Approval Order is effective upon Ecology's receipt any required fees. All plans, speciftcations, and otherinformation submitted to the Department ofEcology relative to this project and further documents and any further authorizations orapprovals or denials in relation thereto shall be 

### kept at the

### Eastern Regional Office ofthe Department of

### Ecologyinthe

"Air Quality Controlled Source" files and by such action shall be incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Nothing in this approval shall be construed as obviating compliance with any requirement oflaw other than those imposed pursuant to the Washington Clean Air Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
A three-month testing and break-in period is allowed, after any part orportion ofthis project becomes operational, to make any changes or adjustments required to comply with applicable rules and regulations pertaining to airquality and conditions ofoperation imposed herein. Thereafter, any violation ofsuch rules and regulations orofthe terms ofthis approval shall be 

### subject to the sanctions provided in Chapter70.94 RCW.

# I. mP, inc. Page 10 

### of 10 Order No. 02AQER-5074 December 6, 2002 

### Authorization may be modified, suspended, orrevoked in whole orpart for cause including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Violation ofany terms orconditions ofthis**auth~rization;** 

### 2. Obtaining this authorization by misrepresentation orfailure to disclose fully all relevant facts.
The provisions ofthis authorization are severable and, ifany provisions ofthis authorization, or applicatio11 ofany provisions ofthis authorization to any circwnstance. is held invalid, the application ofsuch provision to their circumstances, and the remainder ofthis authorization, shall not be affected thereby. Anyperson feeling aggrieved by this ORDER may obtain review thereofby application, within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofthis ORDER to 

### the Pollution Control Hearings Board, P.O. Box 40903, Olympia, W A 98504-0903. Concurrently, a copy ofthe application must

## pe sent to the Department ofEcology, P.O. Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600 and to the Department of Ecology, 4601 N. Monroe, Suite 202, Spokane, WA 99205-1295. These procedures are consistent with the provisions ofChapter

### 43.21B RCW and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder.

DA

### 1ED at Spokane, Washington, this 6th day ofDecember, 

### 2002.

PREPARED BY:

# ..Q~~ Gregory S. Flibbert, Unit Manager 

### Air Quality

# Program DeP,fU1ment ofEcology