alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03527

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### § 386.15 Distribution of handbills.

The distribution of materials such as pamphlets, handbills and flyers, and the displaying of placards or posting of materials on bulletin boards or elsewhere in or on Academy property shall be coordinated with the Head, Department of Public Safety and Security, of the Academy so as not to impede Academy employees in the performance of their duties or Midshipmen activities.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Partners
Acquisition Partnerships:


              We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 and S-3 of First City Financial Corporation of our report
dated February 14, 1995, relating to the combined balance sheets of Acquisition
Partnerships as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related combined
statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report
appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K/A No. 3 of FirstCity
Financial Corporation.


                                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Fort Worth, Texas
May 27, 1997
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 14, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Thomas Rodney Murphy,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 15-11723

Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Sean F. Cox

United States District Court Judge

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER 

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

DECEMBER 8, 2015 REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff filed this action in state court and it was removed to this Court. Thereafter,

Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss. This Court referred the Motion to Dismiss to Magistrate

Judge Mona Majzoub for issuance of a report and recommendation.

On December 8, 2015, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation

(Docket Entry No. 12) wherein she recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion to

Dismiss and dismiss this action but deny Defendant’s motion for costs and attorney fees.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the

magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id. 

No party has filed objections to the R&R and the time permitted for filing objections to

the R&R has passed.

1

2:15-cv-11246-SFC-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 01/06/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 245
The Court hereby ADOPTS the December 8, 2015 Report and Recommendation. IT IS

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that the Court

Dismisses this action. It is DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: January 6, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

January 6, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-11246-SFC-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 01/06/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 246
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 217 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acquire a parcel of land 

adjacent to Beaufort National Cemetery, Beaufort, South Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acquire a 

parcel of land adjacent to Beaufort National Cemetery, 

Beaufort, South Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACQUISITION OF LAND ADJACENT TO BEAU4 FORT NATIONAL CEMETERY. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE.—Subject to the 

6 availability of appropriations for such purpose, the Sec7 retary of Veterans Affairs shall acquire, in accordance 

8 with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, the parcel 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 217 IH

1 of land described in subsection (b) to be used for the ex2 pansion of the Beaufort National Cemetery, Beaufort, 

3 South Carolina. 

4 (b) PARCEL DESCRIBED.—The parcel of land de5 scribed in this subsection is a parcel of land consisting 

6 of approximately 4.9 acres located on 17th Street in Beau7 fort, South Carolina, as depicted on tax map number 120– 

8 1–238 dated May 4, 1998. 

9 (c) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT DONATION OF PARCEL

10 OF LAND.— 

11 (1) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Veterans 

12 Affairs may accept on behalf of the United States 

13 the gift of the parcel of land described in subsection 

14 (b). The Secretary shall have administrative jurisdic15 tion over such parcel, and shall use such parcel to 

16 expand the Beaufort National Cemetery, Beaufort, 

17 South Carolina. 

18 (2) INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF GIFT.—For 

19 purposes of Federal income, estate, and gift taxes, 

20 the land accepted under paragraph (1) shall be con21 sidered as a gift to the United States. 

22 (d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—As soon as practicable 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

24 of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a report on 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 217 IH

1 the acquisition of the parcel of land described in sub2 section (b). 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Energy Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2010 (the Report), I, Meetesh Patel, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





****

|Date: January 7, 2010 | By:/s/ Meetesh PatelMeetesh Patel   
President, Chief Executive Officer, 
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending July 28, 2007

----

Board OperationsDivision of Information Technology  -- appointment of Maureen Hannan as Director and Marianne Emerson as a Senior Adviser, effective August 5, 2007.					-Approved, July 20, 2007 					(AC)

EnforcementAsian Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Asian Financial Corporation  -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition and order of assessment of civil money penalty against Josephine Wang, a former institution-affiliated party.					-Announced, July 25, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsFair Lending and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act  -- statement by Sandra F. Braunstein, Director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, House Committee on Financial Services.					-Published, July 25, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: August 2, 2007
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
MicroFinancial Incorporated on Form S-8 (File No. 333-75801 and File No.
333-77211) of our report dated February 21, 2000, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of MicroFinancial Incorporated as of December
31, 1998 and 1999, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2000
Coastal Impingement

Percentile

Region % Value Range Count

West Coast 5% 5,800 0-5% 1

10% 8,600 >5-10%

-

25% 17,000 >10-25% 1

50% 100,000 >25-50% 1

75% 270,000 >50-75% 1

90% 870,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Northeastern Coastal 5% 2,900 0-5% 1

10% 5,400 >5-10% 1

25% 9,200 >10-25% 2

50% 20,000 >25-50% 4

75% 140,000 >50-75% 4

90% 6,300,000 >75-90% 2

>90% 2

Mid-Atlantic Coastal 5% 4,000 0-5% 1

10% 5,100 >5-10%

-

25% 34,000 >10-25% 1

50% 150,000 >25-50% 2

75% 170,000 >50-75% 1

90% 260,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Southern Coastal and Gulf 5% 7,000 0-5% 1

10% 8,100 >5-10%

-

25% 17,000 >10-25% 1

50% 77,000 >25-50% 2

75% 240,000 >50-75% 1

Facilities Within a

Specified

Percentile Range

75% 240,000 >50-75% 1

90% 760,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

All Coastal Facilities 5% 2,900 0-5% 3

10% 3,100 >5-10% 2

25% 8,900 >10-25% 6

50% 26,000 >25-50% 10

75% 180,000 >50-75% 9

90% 590,000 >75-90% 5

>90% 4Freshwater Impingement

Percentile

Region % Value Range Count

Great Lakes 5% 1,800 0-5% 2

10% 3,100 >5-10% 1

25% 19,000 >10-25% 3

50% 360,000 >25-50% 5

75% 2,800,000 >50-75% 5

90% 24,000,000 >75-90% 3

>90% 3

Southeastern Reservoirs 5% 8,600 0-5% 1

10% 9,200 >5-10%

-

25% 27,000 >10-25% 1

50% 53,000 >25-50% 2

75% 180,000 >50-75% 1

90% 190,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Midwestern Reservoirs 5% 660 0-5% 1

10% 1,100 >5-10%

-

25% 13,000 >10-25% 2

50% 120,000 >25-50% 2

75% 330,000 >50-75% 2

90% 2,100,000 >75-90% 1

>90% 1

Southwestern Cooling Lakes 5% 3,200 0-5% 1

10% 5,200 >5-10%

-

25% 10,000 >10-25% 2

50% 42,000 >25-50% 2

Facilities Within a

Specified

Percentile Range

50% 42,000 >25-50% 2

75% 220,000 >50-75% 2

90% 320,000 >75-90% 2

>90% 1

Large Rivers 5% 420 0-5% 3

10% 1,200 >5-10% 2

25% 6,100 >10-25% 8

50% 52,000 >25-50% 12

75% 170,000 >50-75% 12

90% 860,000 >75-90% 7

>90% 5

Small Rivers 5% 700 0-5% 2

10% 990 >5-10% 1

25% 4,500 >10-25% 5

50% 42,000 >25-50% 7

75% 290,000 >50-75% 7

90% 1,100,000 >75-90% 4

>90% 3

All Freshwater Facilities 5% 740 0-5% 7

10% 1,300 >5-10% 6

25% 7,300 >10-25% 19

50% 56,000 >25-50% 31

75% 280,000 >50-75% 31

90% 1,800,000 >75-90% 19

>90% 13All Facilities Combined

Percentile

Collection Type % Value Range Count

Impingement 5% 1,045 0-5% 10

10% 1,772 >5-10% 8

25% 8,079 >10-25% 25

50% 59,318 >25-50% 41

75% 262,602 >50-75% 40

90% 1,622,137 >75-90% 24

100% >90% 17

Entrainment 5% 578,749 0-5% 5

10% 1,384,028 >5-10% 4

25% 10,414,685 >10-25% 13

50% 60,063,200 >25-50% 21

75% 553,971,320 >50-75% 22

90% 3,057,658,526 >75-90% 13

100% >90% 11 Facilities Within a

Specified

Percentile Range
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending February 21, 2009

----

Bank Holding CompaniesWells Fargo & Company, San Francisco, California  -- request for temporary relief from the Board's risk-based and leverage capital guidelines, in connection with Wells Fargo's acquisition of Wachovia Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina.					-Granted, February 19, 2009 					

EnforcementCorus Bankshares, Inc., Chicago, Illinois  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.					-Announced, February 19, 2009 					Florida Community Banks, Inc., Immokalee, Florida  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.					-Announced, February 19, 2009 					Polk County Bancorporation, Inc., Johnston, Iowa  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.					-Announced, February 19, 2009 					Temecula Valley Bancorp, Inc., Temecula, California  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, February 19, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyMonetary Policy  -- Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.					-Authorized, February 19, 2009 					

Testimony And StatementsMonetary Policy  -- testimony by Chairman Bernanke before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on February 24 and before the House Committee on Financial Services on February 25, 2009, on the semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.					-Discussed, February 20, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: February 26, 2009
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

1

89–012 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–92

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BUDGET REQUESTS

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

JUNE 28, 2001.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered

to be printed

(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, June 27, 2001.

The SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

SIR: I ask the Congress to consider the enclosed requests for FY

2002 budget amendments for the Department of Defense (DoD).

These amendments would increase my proposed budget totals by

$18.4 billion in support of national defense priorities.

In this amended DoD budget request, I am proposing a total of

$328.9 billion in discretionary budget authority. This is $32.6 billion, or seven percent in real growth, above the FY 2001 enacted

level of $296.3 billion and $18.4 billion more than included in my

initial budget level of $310.5 billion.

The revised FY 2002 Budget begins to address severe shortfalls

in readiness, healthcare, operations, maintenance, and infrastructure that my Administration inherited and that are far worse than

originally understood. The amended budget’s increase of $18.4 billion helps remedy previously underfunded programs, reduces critical military shortfalls, funds realistic reestimates of previously understated costs, and supports modernization programs consistent

with the early results of Secretary Rumsfeld’s ongoing strategy review.

The amended budget carefully targets resources to improve military morale, bolster readiness, and transform defense capabilities.

It begins efforts to streamline and upgrade the deteriorating DoD

infrastructure, which will help boost morale and readiness, support

transformation, and ultimately save billions of dollars. And, it initiates several management reform initiatives to change the way DoD

conducts business.

The details of these requests are set forth in the enclosed letter

from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. I concur with his comments and observations.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH.

Enclosure.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109
###### Editorial Note on Part 287

#### Editorial Note:

The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

#### § 287.5 Tentative authorization to establish fund.

Where the time between the receipt by the Administration of the application for permission to establish a construction reserve fund and the date prior to which an amount received from the sale or loss of a vessel must be deposited to come within the scope of section 511 of the Act is insufficient to permit a determination of the eligibility of the applicant, the Administration may tentatively authorize the establishment of a construction reserve fund and the deposit of such amount therein. Such tentative authorization shall be subject to rescission by the Administration if subsequently it is determined that the applicant is not entitled to the benefits of section 511 of the Act, or has not complied with the statutory requirements. For example, a tentative authorization will be rescinded if the Administration ascertains that the applicant is not a citizen. Upon such determination, the fund shall be closed and all amounts on deposit therein shall be withdrawn.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,188
<PP&E>                                       4,133,496
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,608,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 580,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     580,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   580,626
<SALES>                                        195,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,832
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               596,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (398,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (398,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (398,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (40.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (40.34)
        

</TABLE>