alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.178 Marking of stowage locations. ( a ) Containers, brackets, racks, and other similar stowage locations for lifesaving equipment must be marked with symbols in accordance with IMO Resolution A.760(18) indicating the device stowed in that location.
( b ) If more than one device is stowed in a location, the number of devices stowed must be indicated.
( c ) Survival craft should be numbered consecutively starting from the vessel's bow. Survival craft on the starboard side should be numbered with odd numerals and survival craft on the port side should be numbered with even numerals.
( d ) Each liferaft stowage location should be marked with the capacity of the liferaft stowed there.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1542

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984

to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 1995

Mr. LIPINSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor

Act of 1984 to modify the boundaries of the corridor,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF BOUNDARIES.

4 Section 104(b)(1) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal

5 National Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 461

6 note) is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(1) The corridor shall consist of the Joliet Army

8 Ammunition Plant in the State of Illinois and the areas

9 depicted on—
2

•HR 1542 IH

1 ‘‘(A) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michigan

2 Canal National Heritage Corridor’, dated May 1983

3 and numbered IMC–80,000;

4 ‘‘(B) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michigan

5 Canal National Heritage Corridor—Boundary Defi6 nition for portions of the Corridor East of Harlem

7 Avenue’, dated –––––––– and numbered ––––––––;

8 and

9 ‘‘(C) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michigan

10 Canal National Heritage Corridor—Boundary Defi11 nition for the Lake Renwick Zone’, dated –––––––

12 and numbered ––––––––,

13 each of which maps shall be on file and available for public

14 inspection in the offices of the Commission and in the of15 fices of the National Park Service.’’.

16 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF COMMISSION.

17 Section 111(a) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal Na18 tional Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 1456; 16

19 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking out ‘‘ten’’ and

20 inserting ‘‘20’’.

Æ
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

GREGORY EVERETT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 15-cv-11087 

v. 

 HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

TED WAHBY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________/ 

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED OCTOBER 14, 2015 (Dkt. 29); AND (2) GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 22) 

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti, issued on October 14, 2015 (Dkt. 29). In the R&R, the 

Magistrate Judge recommends granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 22). 

The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The failure to file a timely objection to an R&R constitutes a waiver of 

the right to further judicial review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not 

appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal 

conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those 

findings.”); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373-1374 (6th Cir. 1987) 

(failure to file objection to R&R “waived subsequent review of the matter”); Cephas v. Nash, 

328 F.3d 98, 1078 (2d Cir. 2003) (“As a rule, a party’s failure to object to any purported error or 

omission in a magistrate judge’s report waives further judicial review of the point.”); Lardie v. 

Birkett, 221 F. Supp. 2d 806, 807 (E.D. Mich. 2002) (“As to the parts of the report and 

recommendation to which no party has objected, the Court need not conduct a review by any 

2:15-cv-11087-MAG-APP Doc # 30 Filed 11/03/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 231
2 

standard.”). There is some authority that a district court is required to review the R&R for clear 

error, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Advisory Committee Note Subdivision (b) (“When no timely 

objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the 

record in order to accept the recommendation.”). Therefore, the Court has reviewed the R&R for 

clear error. On the face of the record, the Court finds no clear error and accepts the 

recommendation. 

Accordingly, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 22). 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 3, 2015 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

 Detroit, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

 United States District Judge 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and 

any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class 

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 3, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Case Manager 

2:15-cv-11087-MAG-APP Doc # 30 Filed 11/03/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 232
§ 58.10-10 Diesel engine installations. ( a ) The requirements of § 58.10-5 (a), (c), and (d) apply to diesel engine installations.
( b ) A diesel engine air intake on a mobile offshore drilling unit must not be in a classified location.
( c ) A diesel engine exhaust on a mobile offshore drilling unit must not discharge into a classified location.
Note 1 to § 58.10-10 :
Sections 108.171 to 108.175 of this chapter define classified locations for mobile offshore drilling units.
# C_2012080EN.01002602.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/26

---

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Ghost Brand v OHIM — Procter & Gamble International Operations (GHOST)

(Case T-298/11) (1)

1

2012/C 80/45

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
```

[Federal Register: March 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 58)]
[Notices]               
[Page 14652]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26mr10-109]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending March 13, 
2010

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, 
as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0060.
    Date Filed: March 8, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

 TC3 Within South West Pacific, between South Asian Subcontinent, South 
East Asia and South West Pacific (Memo 1364).
Intended effective date: for travel on/after: 1 June 2010.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0061.
    Date Filed: March 8, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

Mail Vote 628 Resolutions 010s, TC2 within Africa, Special Passenger 
Amending Resolution from Angola to Namibia (Memo 0199).
Intended effective date: 22 March 2010.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-6717 Filed 3-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
# C_2015016EN.01002801.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2014 — Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (ZENATO RIPASSA)

(Case T-153/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ZENATO RIPASSA - Earlier national word mark RIPASSO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2015/C 016/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Cantina Broglie 1 Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 December 2010 (Case R 183/2010-2) concerning opposition proceedings between the Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona and Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cantina Broglie 1 Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cantina Broglie 1 Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.

---
§ 502.321 Applicability of other rules of this part. ( a ) Except otherwise specifically provided in this subpart or in paragraph (b) of this section, the sections in subparts A through Q, inclusive, of this part do not apply to situations covered by this subpart.
( b ) The following sections in subparts A through Q apply to situations covered by this subpart: §§ 502.2(a) (Requirement for filing); 502.2(f)(1) (Email transmission of filings); 502.2(i) (Continuing obligation to provide contact information); 502.7 (Documents in foreign languages); 502.21-502.23 (Appearance, Authority for representation, Notice of appearance; substitution and withdrawal of representative); 502.43 (Substitution of parties); 502.253 (Interest in reparation proceedings); and 502.254 (Attorney fees in complaint proceedings). [Rule 321.]
[76 FR 10262, Feb. 24, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 10519, Mar. 1, 2016]
#### Valentine Cropsey, *Respondent, v.*Philetus R. Perry, *Appel*lant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CompuMed, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. McLaughlin,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CompuMed, Inc.and will be retained by CompuMed, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| /s/  John G. McLaughlin |
|------------------------------|

 

John  G. McLaughlin

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer (Principal Executive Officer)

August 4, 2003

 

 

----
Dear Mr. McArthur:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 2931 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make (s)

, model (s) , and type (s) (i.e.

, fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description (s) should include the maximum weight ( including payload)

. This information can be located in the aircraft manual (s).

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Secti on 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietar y) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/11/15 . I f we do not receive the information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

. Sincerely, /s/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
PUBLIC LAW 111–222—AUG. 6, 2010 124 STAT. 2379 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1053: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111–137 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

May 7, considered and passed Senate. 

July 21, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–222 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to extend the termination 

date. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM ACT. 

Section 4(f) of the National Law Enforcement Museum Act 

(Public Law 106–492) is amended by striking ‘‘10 years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘13 years’’. 

Approved August 6, 2010. 

114 Stat. 2212. 

Aug. 6, 2010 

[S. 1053] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 29, 2005



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO
98-2198.

#### State v. Talley.

Montgomery App. No. 16479. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due October 29,1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Scott, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Scott*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 22.]

*23(Nos. 98-967 and 98-1535

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*Judith M. Stevenson,*Franklin County Public Defender, and *John W. Keeling,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending March 3, 2007

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF THE COMMONWEALTH | * Branch       | Bank of the Commonwealth, Norfolk, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 562 Carotoke Highway, Moyock, North Carolina.     | Newspaper:03/10/2007Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:               | 03/10/2007    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable
|BANK OF THE COMMONWEALTH | * Branch       | Bank of the Commonwealth, Norfolk, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 1304 Greenbrier Parkway, Chesapeake, Virginia.    | Newspaper:03/10/2007Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:               | 03/10/2007    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable
|VIRGINIA BUSINESS BANK   | * Branch       | Virginia Business Bank, Richmond, Virginia, requests permission to provide a courier service to pick up deposits from customers. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 31.01-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG-4), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169, 617-770-3000, *http://www.nfpa.org*. ( 1 ) NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2010 Edition, effective December 5, 2009, IBR approved for § 31.10-18(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48247, July 22, 2016]
#### § 46.10-60 Control.

The Director, Field Operations (DFO) or the Coast Guard District Commander may detain a passenger vessel for a survey if there is reason to believe that such a vessel is proceeding on her journey in excess of the draft allowed by the regulations in this part as indicated by the vessel's load lines certified on the safety certificate, load line certificate, or otherwise. The Coast Guard District Commander may detain a passenger vessel if it is so loaded as to be manifestly unsafe to proceed to sea. Except as otherwise required by this section, § 42.07-60 of this subchapter applies to all passenger vessels assigned load lines under the load line acts and the regulations of this subchapter.

[USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59777, Oct. 1, 2012]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEON K. DANIELS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-1231

[June 24, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Sandra K. McSorley, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502000CF004762A.

Leon K. Daniels, Miami, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina 

Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for 

postconviction relief and remand this matter for further proceedings 

consistent with Falcon v. State, 40 Fla. L. Weekly S151 (Fla. Mar. 19, 

2015), and Horsley v. State, 160 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 2015).

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

      I, Tracey A. Welsh, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

      (i)   the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Dated: May 14, 2003
                                      /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Tracey A. Welsh
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Shores Bank Corporation and will be retained by Community
Shores Bank Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.








                                     - 30 -