alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending June 21, 2008

|Filer                 | Filing Type        | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CBT CORPORATION, INC. | * 18C* Branch* 3A3 | CBT Corporation, Inc., which owns Citizens Bank & Trust Company, both of Big Timber, Montana,  to acquire 100% of The Continental National Bank of Harlowton, Harlowton, Montana. Citizens Bank & Trust Company to merge with The Continental National Bank of Harlowton and incident thereto establish branch facilities to be located at 32 North Central Avenue, Harlowton, and 121 East 1st Avenue, Ryegate, Montana. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/03/2008
|Newspaper:            | Not available     
|Federal Register:     | 07/03/2008        

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 327.41 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this subpart: ( a ) *Accrual date.* The day on which the alleged wrongful act or omission results in injury or damage for which a claim is made.
( b ) *Claim.* A written notification of an incident, signed by the claimant, describing the incident and explaining why the United States is liable. The claim shall be accompanied by a demand for the payment of a sum certain of money, with a statement as to how that sum certain was calculated and all documents supporting the amount claimed. Where damages for medical injuries are made, the doctor's statement relating the injuries to the accident should be attached as well as medical release forms for each treating physician, hospital, and medical care provider.
#### Dayton Bar Association *v.*Millonig.

[Cite as *Dayton Bar Assn. v. Millonig*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 403.]

(No. 98-1798

Submitted October 28, 1998

Decided January 20, 1999.)

*404
      *Casper & Casper*and *Patrick W. Allen,*for relator.

*Arthur F. Millonig, Jr., pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusion that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) by failing to file the tax returns.

*405Because respondent was originally charged with a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and had notice and an opportunity to make his defense, relator’s subsequent withdrawal of the charge did not preclude the panel and the board from finding that respondent’s stipulated misconduct violated this Disciplinary Rule. We consequently distinguish *Disciplinary Counsel v. Simecek*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 320, 699 N.E.2d 933, in which we held that after the record was closed, the board could not find disciplinary violations that were not originally charged.

We also agree with the board regarding the appropriate sanction. Unlike *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh*(1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190-191, 658 N.E.2d 237, 240, where we held that a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) requires an actual suspension from the practice of law, there is no evidence in this case that respondent ever lied to his clients or any court. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. Failure to file income tax returns, whether or not tax is due, is a serious violation that deserves more than a public reprimand. Therefore, I would suspend respondent for one year, and would stay that suspension on the condition that during this stay no disciplinary complaints are certified to the board by a probable cause panel.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: April 7, 2011 Conference Call with Sena tor Snowe’s Office and Katahdin Paper

on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On April 7, 2011, EPA participants were sche duled to call members of Senator Olympia Snowe’s office and Katahdin Paper to discuss their issues and concerns with the final rule entitled, “Identification of Non- Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as

the 2011 NHSM Final Rule.

During that conference call, atte ndees expressed concerns with the rule’s characterization of several NHSMs and potential impacts to the Katahdin Paper company.

EPA asked clarifying questions rega rding the information presented.

Expected or Invite d Meeting Attendants: Members of Senator Olympia Snow’s Office Representatives from Katahdin Paper Jim Berlow, EPA Randy Deitz, EPA George Faison, EPA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-20457 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

D1, DWAYNE DUPREE, 

 Defendant. 

________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS 

IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE AND REQUEST FOR 

AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ECF #69) 

Before the Court is Defendant Dwayne Dupree’s “Motion to Suppress 

Identification Evidence and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing” (the “Motion to 

Suppress”). (ECF #69.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Suppress 

is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record at the conclusion of the hearing 

held on July 27, 2016. 

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: July 27, 2016 

 

2:15-cr-20457-MFL-APP Doc # 74 Filed 07/27/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 219
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on July 27, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cr-20457-MFL-APP Doc # 74 Filed 07/27/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 220
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending February 21, 2009

|Filer                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|JANESVILLE HOLDING COMPANY | CIC           | Notice by Michael John Finley, Janesville, Minnesota, to gain control of Janesville Holding Company and thereby indirectly gain control of Janesville State Bank, both of Janesville, Minnesota.                                                                                                                                                       | Newspaper:03/04/2009Federal Register:03/11/2009      
|Newspaper:                 | 03/04/2009   
|Federal Register:          | 03/11/2009   
|QUALITY BANKSHARES, INC.   | CIC           | Gary and Mary Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, Wade and Marilyn Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, Keith and Brenda Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, and Reed Ihry, Devils Lake, North Dakota, as a group acting in concert, to acquire control of Quality Bankshares, Inc., Fingal, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of Quality Bank, Fingal, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                 | Not available
|Federal Register:          | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2009 (April 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’sknowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: September 6, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: September 6, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 310.8 Leave. ( a ) *Enrolled before April 1, 1982.* Limitations on cadet leave, without loss of Federal student subsistence, with the specific limits to be set at the discretion of the Superintendent on an academic year basis, are: ( 1 ) If hospitalized, sick at home, or confined in the sick bay, leave shall not exceed four (4) months.
( 2 ) For an emergency due to the serious illness, injury or death of a very near relative, leave shall not exceed seven (7) days.
( 3 ) Annual leave shall not exceed thirty (30) days.
( 4 ) Christmas and Easter leave shall not exceed a total of twelve (12) days, and leave may be granted for all legal holidays—Federal and state. This leave is in addition to that granted in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( 5 ) Leave in addition to that provided in paragraphs (a) (3) and (4) of this section may be granted only if approved in advance by the Supervisor, upon direct request by the Superintendent.
( b ) *Enrolled on or after April 1, 1982.* Midshipmen will be granted leave without loss of incentive payments as follows: ( 1 ) Medical leave, as authorized by the school, not to exceed four (4) months.
( 2 ) Christmas and Easter leave and all legal holidays—Federal and state—as authorized by the school. This leave is in addition to that granted in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
( 3 ) Excused absences, as authorized by the school, not to exceed thirty (30) days per academic year. All unauthorized leave and all excused absences in excess of thirty (30) days will result in loss of incentive payments. Midshipmen receiving student incentive payments may be granted leaves of absence without pay, as approved by the Superintendent, for periods not to exceed one (1) academic year at a time. Midshipmen in a pay status will only be granted a leave of absence if they continue to meet all requirements for graduation in this part, including age requirements.
[48 FR 24081, May 31, 1983]
§ 56.75-30 Pipe joining details. ( a ) *Silver brazing.* ( 1 ) Circumferential pipe joints may be either of the socket or butt type. When butt joints are employed the edges to be joined must be cut or machined square and the edges must be held closely together to insure a satisfactory joint.
( b ) *Copper-alloy brazing.* ( 1 ) Copper-alloy brazing may be employed to join pipe, valves, and fittings. Circumferential joints may be either of the butt or socket type. Where butt joints are employed, the included angle must be not less than 90° where the wall thickness is three-sixteenths of an inch or greater. The annular clearance of socket joints must be held to small clearances.
( 2 ) Copper pipe fabricated with longitudinal joints for pressures not exceeding that permitted by the regulations in this subchapter may have butt, lapped, or scarfed joints. If of the latter type, the kerf of the material must be not less than 60°.
( c ) *Brazing, general.* ( 1 ) Heat must be applied evenly and uniformly to all parts of the joint in order to prevent local overheating.
( 2 ) The members to be joined must be held firmly in place until the brazing alloy has set so as to prevent any strain on the joint until the brazing alloy has thoroughly solidified. The brazing must be done by placing the flux and brazing material on one side of the joint and applying heat until the brazing material flows entirely through the lap and shows uniformly along the seam on the other side of the joint. Sufficient flux must be used to cause the brazing material to appear promptly after reaching the brazing temperature.
§ 503.69 Fees. ( a ) *General.* The following Commission services are available, with respect to requests made under the provisions of this subpart, for which fees will be charged as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section: ( 1 ) Copying records/documents.
( 2 ) Certification of copies of documents.
( b ) *Fees for services.* The fees set forth below provide for documents to be mailed with ordinary first-class postage prepaid. If a copy is to be transmitted by registered, certified, air, or special delivery mail, postage therefor will be added to the basic fee. Also, if special handling or packaging is required, costs thereof will be added to the basic fee. ( 1 ) The copying of records and documents will be available at the rate of ten cents per page (one side), limited to size 81 ⁄ 4′′ x 14′′ or smaller.
( 2 ) The certification and validation (with Federal Maritime Commission seal) of documents filed with or issued by the Commission will be available at $107 for each certification.
( c ) *Payment of fees and charges.* The fees charged for special services may be paid by check, draft, or postal money order, payable to the Federal Maritime Commission.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 59171, Nov. 16, 1994; 81 FR 59144, Aug. 29, 2016; 88 FR 16898, March 21, 2023; 88 FR 41040, June 23, 2023]
Exhibit 99.1

                                Certification of
                           Chief Executive Officer of
                          Universal Money Centers, Inc.

      I, David S.  Bonsal,  Chief  Executive  Officer of  Universal
Money Centers,  Inc., hereby certify,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

      (a)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the year ended April 30,
           2003, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
           requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
           of 1934, as amended; and

      (b)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
           the quarter ended April 30, 2003, which accompanies this
           certification, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
           financial condition and results of operations of Universal Money
           Centers, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Universal Money Centers, Inc. and will be retained by Universal
Money Centers, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Dated:  June 16, 2003.

                                            /s/ David S. Bonsal
                                            -------------------------
                                            David S. Bonsal
                                            Chief Executive Officer
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

MARCH 29, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED102182 MICHAEL M. PENNELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

2. ED102481 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RALPH H. CATO, APP

3. ED102856 MARIO HAWKINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

4. ED102904 M.C., APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES

5. ED102908 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DERRICK BARNES, APP

6. ED102979 JOHN DONLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

7. ED103205 EDMUND VOGEL, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                 UGI CORPORATION
                        SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

      The table below shows the components of director compensation effective
October 1, 2003. A director who is an officer or employee of the Registrant or
its subsidiaries is not compensated for service on the Board of Directors or on
any Committee of the Board.

                             DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  CASH             EQUITY
                                               COMPONENT        COMPONENT (1)
                                               ---------        ----------
<S>                                            <C>         <C>
Annual retainer                                 $52,000    1,275 Stock Units


                                                           4,250 Options for the
                                                           purchase of shares of
                                                           common stock of the
                                                           Registrant.

Annual retainer for Audit Committee Members     $57,000               --

Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair       $62,000               --
</TABLE>

(1)   Stock Units and Options are granted under the UGI Corporation 2004 Omnibus
      Equity Compensation Plan
#### § 61.05-20 Boiler safety valves.

Each safety valve for a drum, superheater, or reheater of a boiler must be tested at the interval specified by table 1 to § 61.05-10.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51202, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 340.8 Priorities for materials and production. ( a ) Vessel operators, port authorities and container and chassis suppliers may request priority ratings to obtain production materials and services necessary to comply with orders issued under this regulation. Requests for priority rating authority must be made through and sponsored by the Maritime Administrator, in accordance with the Defense Priorities and Allocation System (15 CFR part 330 *et seq.* (49 FR 30412, July 30, 1984)) and Departmental policies governing supporting resources support.
( b ) Vessel operators, port authorities and container and chassis suppliers may request priority ratings to obtain fuels necessary to comply with orders issued under this regulation. Requests for priority ratings will be made in accordance with regulations issued by the Department.