alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.    The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ RICK BERRYRick
      BerryChief
      Financial Officer





May 10,
2010





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 11, 2007, 7 a.m. to June 
11, 2007, 6 p.m., Holiday Inn Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20007 which was published in the Federal Register on May 
17, 2007, 72 FR 27831-27832.
    The meeting title has been changed to ``Small Business: Biomedical 
Devices and Bioengineering''. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: May 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2614 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed September 22, reconsideration allowed; opinion (136 Or App 222, 901 P2d 925) modified;

remanded to Board for reconsideration November 15, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Warren N. Bowen, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and University of Oregon, *Petitioners, v.*Warren N. BOWEN, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-15616; CA A77263)

905 P2d 1184

James L. Edmunson and Malagon, Moore, Johnson & Jensen, for motion.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

DEITS, P. J.

*600DEITS, P. J.

Claimant moves for reconsideration of our decision in *SAIF v. Bowen,*136 Or App 222, 901 P2d 925 (1995). He argues that our disposition of the case, remanding to the Board with instructions to dismiss, is in error. We allow the motion to reconsider.

Claimant asserts that our statement in the opinion that “[T]he issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board had jurisdiction to determine the appropriateness of proposed medical treatment for claimant” is in error. *Id.*at 224. Our statement of the issue was correct as far as it went. However, claimant is correct that there is a remaining question before the Board concerning this issue that we did not identify and that has not been directly resolved. That question is whether, under these circumstances, the Director’s exclusive authority to determine whether treatment is “appropriate” includes the authority to decide whether the condition requiring treatment is causally related to the compensable injury or whether the Board has jurisdiction to consider that question. Accordingly, our conclusion that the Board lacked jurisdiction was premature, and our remand to the Board should not have been with instructions to dismiss. Rather, the remand should be for reconsideration.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; remanded to Board for reconsideration.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000700815
<NAME> GOLDEN MAPLE MINING AND LEACHING COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        00
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,013
<OTHER-SE>                                    (85,155)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,701
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,701
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            2956
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2954
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           10325
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         122432
<ALLOWANCE>                                        955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  146915
<DEPOSITS>                                      121555
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2253
<LONG-TERM>                                      11192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2035
<OTHER-SE>                                        9881
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  146915
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  11369
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  700
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   108
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11794
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                5682
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6549
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5245
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       48
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1126
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1126
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.04
<LOANS-NON>                                       1951
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1975
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1004
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      209
<RECOVERIES>                                       113
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  955
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               955
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            546
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 75 (Thursday, April 19, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 19779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1984]



[[Page 19777]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Proclamation 8126--Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy at Virginia Tech


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 75 / Thursday, April 19, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 19779]]

                Proclamation 8126 of April 17, 2007

                
Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy at Virginia 
                Tech

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                Our Nation grieves with those who have lost loved ones 
                at Virginia Tech. We hold the victims in our hearts. We 
                lift them up in our prayers, and we ask a loving God to 
                comfort those who are suffering.

                As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless 
                acts of violence perpetrated on Monday, April 16, 2007, 
                by the authority vested in me as President of the 
                United States by the Constitution and the laws of the 
                United States of America, I hereby order that the flag 
                of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at 
                the White House and upon all public buildings and 
                grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and 
                on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the 
                District of Columbia and throughout the United States 
                and its Territories and possessions until sunset, 
                Sunday, April 22, 2007. I also direct that the flag 
                shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of 
                time at all United States embassies, legations, 
                consular offices, and other facilities abroad, 
                including all military facilities and naval vessels and 
                stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                seventeenth day of April, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 07-1984
Filed 4-18-07; 8:53 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.16
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Mining Properties  McArthur River, The Nuclear Business  Development
Projects  Cigar Lake and Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual
Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2009 dated March 31, 2010 for the
McArthur River/Key Lake and the Cigar Lake properties; and(b)
    
    under the heading Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31,
2009 dated February 23, 2010 for the McArthur River/Key Lake and the Cigar Lake
properties,
    /s/ Lorne SchwartzName:
    
    Lorne Schwartz, P. Eng.Title:
    
    Chief Metallurgist, Cameco CorporationDate:
    
    March 31, 2010
§ 520.11 Non-vessel-operating common carriers. ( a ) *Financial responsibility.* An ocean transportation intermediary that operates as a non-vessel-operating common carrier must state in its tariff publication: ( 1 ) That it has furnished the Commission proof of its financial responsibility in the manner and amount required by part 515 of this chapter;
( 2 ) The manner of its financial responsibility;
( 3 ) Whether it is relying on coverage provided by a group or association to which it is a member;
( 4 ) The name and address of the surety company, insurance company, or guarantor issuing the bond, insurance policy, or guaranty;
( 5 ) The number of its bond, insurance policy, or guaranty; and
( 6 ) Where applicable, the name and address of the group or association providing coverage.
( b ) *Agent for service.* Every NVOCC not in the United States must state the name and address of the person in the United States designated under part 515 of this chapter as its legal agent for service of process, including subpoenas. The NVOCC must also state that in any instance in which the designated legal agent cannot be served because of death, disability, or unavailability, the Commission's Secretary will be deemed to be its legal agent for service of process.
( c ) *Co-loading.* NVOCCs must address the following situations in their tariffs: ( 1 ) If two or more NVOCCs enter into an agreement which establishes a carrier-to-carrier relationship for the co-loading of cargo, then the existence of such agreement must be noted in the tariff. Carrier-to-carrier relationships apply to the co-loading of less than container loads of cargo only.
( 2 ) If two NVOCCs enter into a co-loading arrangement which results in a shipper-to-carrier relationship, the tendering NVOCC must describe its co-loading practices and specify its responsibility to pay any charges for the transportation of the cargo. A shipper-to-carrier relationship is presumed to exist where the receiving NVOCC issues a bill of lading to the tendering NVOCC for carriage of the co-loaded cargo. Shipper-to-carrier relationships may apply to the co-loading of full container loads or less than container loads of cargo.
( 3 ) An NVOCC which tenders cargo to another NVOCC for co-loading, whether under a shipper-to-carrier or carrier-to-carrier relationship, shall annotate each applicable bill of lading with the identity of any other NVOCC to which the shipment has been tendered for co-loading. Such annotation shall be shown on the face of the bill of lading in a clear and legible manner.
[89 FR 32, Jan. 2, 2024]
Confirmation of Company in connection with Tenth Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 CONFIRMATION 
  
 The undersigned OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (with its successors and assigns, the “Guarantor”),
has executed and delivered to NATIONAL CITY BANK, a national banking association (with its successors and assigns, “Bank”), the Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty Of Payment, dated as of July 15, 1999 (the
“Guaranty”), in respect of, among other matters, the Credit Agreement dated July 14, 1997 (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), between
Bank, ON Marine Services Company, a Delaware corporation (“ONMS”), and Oglebay Norton Marine Services Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“LLC”, and together with ONMS, collectively, “Borrowers”),
under which Bank agreed to make a term loan to Borrowers in the original principal amount of $17,000,000, subject to certain conditions and in accordance with the terms thereof. The Guaranty was made for the benefit of Borrowers to guarantee the
payment of the Subject Debt (as defined in the Guaranty) as and when the respective parts thereof become due. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of an executed copy of Amendment No. 10 to Credit Agreement dated as of the date hereof,
between Bank and Borrowers (the “Amendment”). The Guarantor hereby acknowledges and consents to the amendments to the Credit Agreement set forth in the Amendment, and hereby accepts and agrees to be bound by the terms of the
Credit Agreement as amended by the Amendment. The Guarantor further hereby (a) ratifies and confirms all of its obligations under the Guaranty notwithstanding the execution and delivery of the Amendment, (b) agrees that the Guaranty, and its
obligations thereunder, shall continue in full force and effect upon the effectiveness of the Amendment, and (c) agrees that all references in the Guaranty to the Credit Agreement shall include the Amendment. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Guarantor has caused this Confirmation to be
executed and delivered as of the 31st day of January, 2005. 
  

			
	 OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY 
                 as Guarantor

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Julie A. Boland


	Name:	 	Julie A. Boland
	Title:	 	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1492 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1492

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that service 
performed for an elementary or secondary school operated primarily for 
    religious purposes is exempt from the Federal unemployment tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 1995

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that service 
performed for an elementary or secondary school operated primarily for 
    religious purposes is exempt from the Federal unemployment tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 
3309(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption 
from unemployment tax) is amended by inserting before the semicolon at 
the end thereof the following: ``, or (C) an elementary or secondary 
school which is operated primarily for religious purposes, which is 
described in section 501(c)(3), and which is exempt from tax under 
section 501(a)''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to services 
performed after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of PowerCold Corp (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Simola , President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Francis L. Simola

--------------------------------------------------

Francis L. Simola, President and CEO

Date:  March 24, 2003
#### § 54.25-3 Steel plates (modifies UCS-6).

The steels listed in UCS-6(b) of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) will be allowed only in Class III pressure vessels (see table 2 to § 54.01-5(b)).

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65170, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### In the Matter of THE NEW YORK, WEST SHORE AND BUFFALO RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent, *v*. ANDREW S. LE FEVRE and Others, Appellants.

*Saüroad*company— *taking of land for*— *how the owner’s damages, where his land is separated Iry a highway, are to he determined.*

Appeal from the appraisal and report of commissioners appointed to ascertain and determine the compensation to be made to the owners of property sought to be taken by the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company.

The court at General Term said: “We have had occasion to examine recently the rules applicable to this class of cases, and do not think it necessary to discuss them now at any length.

“ The present is not a case of two city lots, separated by a street and used independently of each other.

*“*It is the case of a dwelling-house with some ten acres of land adjacent and occupied in connection, through which a turnpike road runs, dividing the land into two parts. In this case, therefore, the *538owner of the land was entitled to have the damages to the whole property estimated, including that on the west side of the turnpike. The land should have been treated as a whole, and the injury to it as a whole should have been assessed. To give the owner damages only for the injury to the part east of the turnpike would afford no fair or reasonable compensation. And in refusing to consider the injury to the land as a whole, including that west of the turnpike, the assessor did injustice to the owner.”

*Alton B.*Parker, for the appellants.

*F. I.*Westbrook, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Bockes and BoARDMAN, JJ.

Order reversed and assessment set aside; new assessment ordered by new commissioners, to be appointed by Special Term, with costs1 to appellants.