55032 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by November 13, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: August 20, 2015. 

Mark Hague, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 

as set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart R—Kansas 

■ 2. In § 52.870, the table in paragraph 

(e) is amended by adding entry (42) at 

the end of the table to read as follows: 

§ 52.870 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e)* * * 

EPA-APPROVED KANSAS NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of nonregulatory SIP provision Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

(42) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for the 

Attainment and Maintenance of National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards for Regional Haze (2014 

Five-Year Progress Report).

Statewide ......................... 3/10/15 9/14/15 [Insert Federal 

Register citation] 

[FR Doc. 2015–23074 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[EPA–R06–2015–0070 RCRA; FRL–9933– 

79–Region 6] 

Louisiana: Final Authorization of State 

Hazardous Waste Management 

Program Revision 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: Louisiana has applied to the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

for final authorization of the changes to 

its hazardous waste program under the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA). The EPA has determined 

that these changes satisfy all 

requirements needed to qualify for final 

authorization, and is authorizing the 

State’s changes through this direct final 

action. The EPA is publishing this rule 

to authorize the changes without a prior 

proposal because we believe this action 

is not controversial and do not expect 

comments that oppose it. Unless we 

receive written comments which oppose 

this authorization during the comment 

period, the decision to authorize 

Louisiana’s changes to its hazardous 

waste program will take effect. If we 

receive comments that oppose this 

action, we will publish a document in 

the Federal Register withdrawing this 

rule before it takes effect, and a separate 

document in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register will serve as a 

proposal to authorize the changes. 

DATES: This final authorization will 

become effective on November 13, 2015 

unless the EPA receives adverse written 

comment by October 14, 2015. If the 

EPA receives such comment, it will 

publish a timely withdrawal of this 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

and inform the public that this 

authorization will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit any comments 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06– 

RCRA–2015–0070, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov. 

3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Region 6, 

Regional Authorization Coordinator, 

State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD–O), 

Multimedia Planning and Permitting 

Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202–2733. 

4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver 

your comments to Alima Patterson, 

Region 6, Regional Authorization 

Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight 

Section (6PD–O), Multimedia Planning 

and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 

1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202– 

2733. 

Instructions: Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through 

regulations.gov, or email. Direct your 

comment to Docket No. EPA–R06– 

RCRA–2015–0070. The Federal 

regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means the EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 55033 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption, and be free of any 

defects or viruses. You can view and 

copy Louisiana’s application and 

associated publicly available materials 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday 

through Friday at the following 

locations: Louisiana Department of 

Environmental Quality, 602 N. Fifth 

Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70884– 

2178, phone number (225) 219–3559 

and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, phone 

number (214) 665–8533. Interested 

persons wanting to examine these 

documents should make an 

appointment with the office at least two 

weeks in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 

Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal 

Oversight Section (6PD–O), Multimedia 

Planning and Permitting Division, EPA 

Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 

Texas 75202–2733, (214) 665–8533) and 

Email address patterson.alima@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Why are revisions to State programs 

necessary? 

States which have received final 

authorization from the EPA under RCRA 

section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must 

maintain a hazardous waste program 

that is equivalent to, consistent with, 

and no less stringent than the Federal 

program. As the Federal program 

changes, States must change their 

programs and ask the EPA to authorize 

the changes. Changes to State programs 

may be necessary when Federal or State 

statutory or regulatory authority is 

modified or when certain other changes 

occur. 

Most commonly, States must change 

their programs because of changes to the 

EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 

through 268, 270, 273, and 279. 

B. What decisions have we made in this 

rule? 

We conclude that Louisiana’s 

application to revise its authorized 

program meets all of the statutory and 

regulatory requirements established by 

RCRA. Therefore, we grant Louisiana 

final authorization to operate its 

hazardous waste program with the 

changes described in the authorization 

application. Louisiana has 

responsibility for permitting treatment, 

storage, and disposal facilities within its 

borders (except in Indian Country) and 

for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA 

program described in its revised 

program application, subject to the 

limitations of the Hazardous and Solid 

Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). 

New Federal requirements and 

prohibitions imposed by Federal 

regulations that the EPA promulgates 

under the authority of HSWA take effect 

in authorized States before they are 

authorized for the requirements. Thus, 

the EPA will implement those 

requirements and prohibitions in 

Louisiana including issuing permits, 

until the State is granted authorization 

to do so. 

C. What is the effect of today’s 

authorization decision? 

The effect of this decision is that a 

facility in Louisiana subject to RCRA 

will now have to comply with the 

authorized State requirements instead of 

the equivalent Federal requirements in 

order to comply with RCRA. Louisiana 

has enforcement responsibilities under 

its State hazardous waste program for 

violations of such program, but the EPA 

retains its authority under RCRA 

sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, 

which include, among others, authority 

to: 

• Do inspections, and require 

monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports; 

• enforce RCRA requirements and 

suspend or revoke permits and 

• take enforcement actions after 

notice to and consultation with the 

State. 

This action does not impose 

additional requirements on the 

regulated community because the 

regulations for which Louisiana is being 

authorized by today’s action are already 

effective under State law, and are not 

changed by today’s action. 

D. Why wasn’t there a proposed rule 

before today’s rule? 

The EPA did not publish a proposal 

before today’s rule because we view this 

as a routine program change and do not 

expect comments that oppose this 

approval. We are providing an 

opportunity for public comment now. In 

addition to this rule, in the proposed 

rules section of today’s Federal Register 

we are publishing a separate document 

that proposes to authorize the State 

program changes. 

E. What happens if the EPA receives 

comments that oppose this action? 

If the EPA receives comments that 

oppose this authorization, we will 

withdraw this rule by publishing a 

document in the Federal Register before 

the rule becomes effective. The EPA will 

base any further decision on the 

authorization of the State program 

changes on the proposal mentioned in 

the previous paragraph. We will then 

address all public comments in a later 

final rule. You may not have another 

opportunity to comment. If you want to 

comment on this authorization, you 

must do so at this time. If we receive 

comments that oppose only the 

authorization of a particular change to 

the State hazardous waste program, we 

will withdraw only that part of this rule, 

but the authorization of the program 

changes that the comments do not 

oppose will become effective on the 

date specified above. The Federal 

Register withdrawal document will 

specify which part of the authorization 

will become effective, and which part is 

being withdrawn. 

F. For what has Louisiana previously 

been authorized? 

The State of Louisiana initially 

received final authorization on February 

7, 1985, (50 FR 3348), to implement its 

base Hazardous Waste Management 

Program. We granted authorization for 

changes to their program on November 

28, 1989 (54 FR 48889) effective January 

29, 1990; August 26, 1991 (56 FR 

41958), as corrected October 15, 1991 

(56 FR 51762) effective October 25, 

1991; November 7, 1994 (59 FR 55368) 

effective January 23, 1995 (Note: on 

January 23, 1995 (60 FR 4380), the EPA 

responded to public adverse comments 

and affirmed the effective date for the 

November 7, 1994 final rule. Then on 

April 11, 1995 (60 FR 18360), the EPA 

also made administrative corrections for 

the January 23, 1995 Federal Register 

document); December 23, 1994 (59 FR 

66200) effective March 8, 1995; October 

17, 1995 (60 FR 53704) effective January 

2, 1996; March 28, 1996 (61 FR 13777) 

effective June 11, 1996; December 29, 

1997 (62 FR 67572) effective March 16, 

1998; October 23, 1998 (63 FR 56830) 

effective December 22, 1998; August 25, 

1999 (64 FR 46302) effective October 25, 

1999; September 2, 1999 (64 FR 48099) 

effective November 1, 1999; February 

28, 2000 (65 FR 10411) effective April 

28, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR 23) 

effective March 5, 2001; December 9, 

2003 (68 FR 68526) effective February 9, 

2004; June 10, 2005 (70 FR 33852) 

effective August 9, 2005; November 13, 

2006 (71 FR 66116) effective January 12, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
55034 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

2007; August 16, 2007 (72 FR 45905) 

effective October 15, 2007; May 20, 2009 

(74 FR 23645) effective July 20, 2009; 

June 24, 2011(76 FR 122) effective 

August 23, 2011; and June 28, 2012 (77 

FR 38530) effective August 27, 2012. On 

October 31, 2014, Louisiana applied for 

approval of its program revisions for 

specific rules in RCRA Clusters XXI, 

XXII and XXIII, in accordance with 40 

CFR 271.21(b)(3). 

Since 1979 through the 

Environmental Affairs Act, Act 449 

enabled the Office of Environmental 

Affairs within the Louisiana Department 

of Natural Resources, as well as, the 

Environmental Control Commission to 

conduct an effective program designed 

to regulate those who generate, 

transport, treat, store, dispose or recycle 

hazardous waste. During the 1983 

Regular Session of the Louisiana 

Legislature, Act 97 was adopted, which 

amended and reenacted La. R. S. 

30:1051 et seq. as the Environmental 

Quality Act, renaming the 

Environmental Affairs Act (Act 1938 of 

1979). This Act created Louisiana 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(LDEQ), including provisions for new 

offices within this new Department of 

Environmental Quality. Act 97 also 

transferred the duties and 

responsibilities previously delegated to 

the Department of Natural Resources, 

Office of Environmental Affairs, to the 

new Department. The LDEQ has lead 

agency jurisdictional authority for 

administering the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 

Subtitle C program in Louisiana. Also, 

the LDEQ is designated to facilitate 

communication between the EPA and 

the State. During the 1999 Regular 

Session of Louisiana Legislature, Act 

303 revised the La. R. S. 30:2011 et seq., 

allowing LDEQ to reengineer the 

Department to perform more efficiently 

and to meet its strategic goals. 

G. What changes are we authorizing 

with today’s action? 

On October 31, 2014, Louisiana 

submitted a final complete program 

revision application, seeking 

authorization of their changes in 

accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We 

now make an immediate final decision, 

subject to receipt of written comments 

that oppose this action, that Louisiana’s 

hazardous waste program revision 

satisfies all of the requirements 

necessary to qualify for Final 

authorization. Therefore, we grant the 

State of Louisiana Final authorization 

for the following changes: The State of 

Louisiana’s program revisions consist of 

regulations which specifically govern 

Revision Checklists 227, 228, and 229 

from RCRA Clusters XXI, XXII, XXIII, 

respectively, as documented in this 

Federal Register: 

Description of Federal requirement 

(include checklist #, if relevant) 

Federal Register 

date and page 

(and/or RCRA statutory authority) 

Analogous State authority 

1. Revision of the Land Disposal 

Treatment Standards for Carbamate Wastes. (Checklist 227).

76 FR 34147–34157, June 13, 

2011.

Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 2013 edition. Section 2299 Appendix Table 2, 

Treatment Standards for Hazardous Waste, and Table 7, Universal 

Treatment Standards, effective September 20, 2013. 

2. Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule. 

(Checklist 228).

77 FR 22229–22232 April 13, 

2012.

Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 2010 edition and the March 2012 Supplement. 

Sections 4901.C.Table 2, Hazardous Wastes from Specific 

Sources, and 4139.B.2, effective March 20, 2012. 

3. Conditional Exclusions for Solvent Contaminated Wipes. 

(Checklist 229).

78 FR 46448–46485 July 31, 2013 Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 2013 edition and the July 2014 Supplement. Sections 109 No Free Liquids, 109.Solvent Contaminated wipe, 

109.Wipe, 105.D.1.w, and 105.D.2.q, effective July 20, 2014. 

H. Where are the revised State rules 

different from the Federal Rules? 

In this authorization of the State of 

Louisiana program revisions for the 

RCRA Cluster XXI, XXII, and XXIII 

rules, there are no provisions that are 

more stringent or broader in scope. 

I. Who handles permits after the 

authorization takes effect? 

Louisiana will issue permits for all 

the provisions for which it is authorized 

and will administer the permits it 

issues. The EPA will continue to 

administer any RCRA hazardous waste 

permits or portions of permits which we 

issued prior to the effective date of this 

authorization. We will not issue any 

more new permits or new portions of 

permits for the provisions listed in the 

Table in this document after the 

effective date of this authorization. The 

EPA will continue to implement and 

issue permits for HSWA requirements 

for which Louisiana is not yet 

authorized. 

J. How does today’s action affect Indian 

Country in Louisiana? 

Louisiana is not authorized to carry 

out its Hazardous Waste Program in 

Indian Country within the State. This 

authority remains with EPA. Therefore, 

this action has no effect in Indian 

Country. 

K. What is codification and is the EPA 

codifying Louisiana’s Hazardous Waste 

Program as authorized in this rule? 

Codification is the process of placing 

the State’s statutes and regulations that 

comprise the State’s authorized 

hazardous waste program into the CFR. 

We do this by referencing the 

authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 

272. We reserve the amendment of 40 

CFR part 272, subpart T for this 

authorization of Louisiana’s program 

changes until a later date. In this 

authorization application the EPA is not 

codifying the rules documented in this 

Federal Register notice. 

L. Administrative Requirements 

The Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) has exempted this action (RCRA 

State Authorization) from the 

requirements of Executive Order 12866 

(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 

13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). 

Therefore, this action is not subject to 

review by OMB. This action authorizes 

State requirements for the purpose of 

RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

State law. Accordingly, this action will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 55035 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action 

authorizes pre-existing requirements 

under State law and does not impose 

any additional enforceable duty beyond 

that required by State law, it does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4). For the same reason, 

this action also does not significantly or 

uniquely affect the communities of 

Tribal governments, as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000). This action will not 

have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999), because it merely 

authorizes State requirements as part of 

the State RCRA hazardous waste 

program without altering the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

RCRA. This action also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it is not 

economically significant and it does not 

make decisions based on environmental 

health or safety risks. This rule is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May 

22, 2001)) because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants 

a State’s application for authorization as 

long as the State meets the criteria 

required by RCRA. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for the 

EPA, when it reviews a State 

authorization application, to require the 

use of any particular voluntary 

consensus standard in place of another 

standard that otherwise satisfies the 

requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. As required by 

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 

FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing 

this rule, the EPA has taken the 

necessary steps to eliminate drafting 

errors and ambiguity, minimize 

potential litigation, and provide a clear 

legal standard for affected conduct. The 

EPA has complied with Executive Order 

12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by 

examining the takings implications of 

the rule in accordance with the 

‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental 

Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk 

and Avoidance of Unanticipated 

Takings’’ issued under the Executive 

Order. This rule does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. It’s main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

Because this rule authorizes pre-existing 

State rules which are at least equivalent 

to, and no less stringent than existing 

federal requirements, and impose no 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law, and there are no 

anticipated significant adverse human 

health or environmental effects, the rule 

is not subject to Executive Order 12898. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this 

document and other required 

information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. 

House of Representatives, and the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication in the 

Federal Register. A major rule cannot 

take effect until 60 days after it is 

published in the Federal Register. This 

action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined 

by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This action 

nevertheless will be effective November 

13, 2015. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Confidential business information, 

Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 

transportation, Indian lands, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: This action is issued under the 

authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and 

7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as 

amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). 

Dated: August 21, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2015–23073 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

49 CFR Part 577 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0048] 

RIN 2127–AL60 

Defect and Noncompliance Notification 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule amends 

NHTSA’s regulation requiring motor 

vehicle manufacturers and replacement 

equipment manufacturers to notify 

owners and purchasers of a defect or 

noncompliance in vehicles or 

equipment that they produced. The 

amendments in this final rule will 

clarify that a manufacturer of 

replacement equipment providing a 

defect or noncompliance notification 

pursuant to this regulation can inform 

the purchaser of the replacement 

equipment of the manufacturer’s intent 

to remedy the defect or noncompliance 

by refunding the purchase price of the 

replacement equipment. NHTSA is 

amending this regulation so that the 

regulation conforms to changes in the 

defect and noncompliance remedy 

provisions in the National Traffic and 

Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Safety Act) 

contained in the Moving Ahead for 

Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP– 

21). 

DATES: Effective date: This final rule is 

effective November 13, 2015. 

Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions 

for reconsideration of this final rule 

must be received not later than October 

29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Any petitions for 

reconsideration should refer to the 

docket number of this document and be 

submitted to: Administrator, National 

Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building, Ground Floor, Docket Room 

W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Healy, Office of Chief Counsel, 

NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Healy’s 

telephone number is (202) 366–2992. 

His fax number is (202) 493–3820. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES