alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BMVIT ' II/L 2 (Luftfahrtsbeziehungen ) Postanschrift : Postfac h 201,100 0 Wie n BDroanschrift : RadetzkystraS e 2 , 1030 Wie n E-Mail : I2@bmvitgv.a t GZ . BMVIT-40.005/0005-li/L2/201 1 DVR:000017 5 Pau l Gretc h Director . Offic e o fInternationa l Aviatio n Offic e o fth e Assistan t Secretaryfo r Aviatio n an d Internationa l Affair s U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Paul.Gretchtatdot.go v CC : nicole.paier@globaljetaustria.con n Dea rMr . Gretch . 

# mu mO F M:-;;^CRTATiO N J-" i OHEHA'nO N 

# bm

© ; i " 3 - 1 n - u 0 •"'«>^:' «

Vienna , 3 0 Septembe r201 1

Wit h referenc e t o th e intention s o fth e Austria n designate d carrie r Globa l Je t Austri a Gmb H (Not e Verba l ofth e Embass yo fAustri a date d IS" ' o fNovembe r2006 ) accordin g t o th e provision s o fth e bilatera l ai rservice s agreemen t (Ai rService s Agreemen t betwee n th e Austria n Federa l Governmen t an d th e Governmen t o fth e Unite d State s o fAmerica , don e a t Vienn a o n 16" " o fMarc h 1989 , a s amended ) t o conduc t non-schedule d (charter ) ai rservice s to/fro m th e Unite d State s base d o n fifth , sixt h o rsevent h freedo m traffi cright s an d referrin g t o th e designatio n o fth e sai d airlin e th e Austri a Civi l Aviatio n Authorit yhereb yconfirm s tha t simila rrequest s submitte d b yth e U.S . carrier s wil l b e treate d o n th e basi s o freciprocity . Sincerel yYours . Antoni a Hatle r Actin g Director , Ai rTranspor t Affair s Federa l Ministryo fTransport , Innovatio n an d Technolog y Civi l Aviatio n Authorit y
§ 67.19 Coastwise endorsement. ( a ) A coastwise endorsement entitles a vessel to employment in unrestricted coastwise trade, dredging, towing, and any other employment for which a registry or fishery endorsement is not required.
( b ) If eligible for documentation and not restricted from coastwise trade by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, the following vessels are eligible for a coastwise endorsement: ( 1 ) Vessels built in the United States (§ 67.97);
( 2 ) Forfeited vessels (§ 67.131);
( 3 ) Vessels granted coastwise trading privileges by special legislation (§ 67.132);
( 4 ) Wrecked vessels (§ 67.133);
( 5 ) Captured vessels (§ 67.134); and
( 6 ) Vessels purchased, chartered, or leased from the Secretary of Transportation by persons who are citizens of the United States (46 U.S.C. 57109).
( c ) A vessel otherwise eligible for a coastwise endorsement under paragraph (b) of this section permanently loses that eligibility if: ( 1 ) It is thereafter sold in whole or in part to an owner: ( i ) Not a citizen as defined in subpart C of this part, or
( ii ) Not a person permitted to document vessels pursuant to 46 CFR part 68;
( 2 ) It is thereafter registered under the laws of a foreign country;
( 3 ) It undergoes rebuilding as defined in § 67.177 outside of the United States; or
( 4 ) It is a crude oil tanker of 20,000 deadweight tons or above, and after October 17, 1978, has segregated ballast tanks, a crude oil washing system, or an inert gas system installed outside of the United States as defined in § 67.3.
( d ) A vessel otherwise eligible for a coastwise endorsement under paragraph (b) of this section loses that eligibility during any period in which it is: ( 1 ) Owned by a corporation which does not meet the citizenship requirements of § 67.39(c);
( 2 ) Owned by a partnership which does not meet the citizenship requirements of § 67.35(c); or
( 3 ) Mortgaged to a person not identified in § 67.233(b).
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 94-008, 59 FR 49846, Sept. 30, 1994; CGD 94-040, 61 FR 17815, Apr. 22, 1996; USCG-2002-13058, 67 FR 61278, Sept. 30, 2002; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49230, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2016-0531, 82 FR 43863, Sept. 20, 2017]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 12 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006 at 71 FR 37694.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named company under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds was terminated effective May 24, 2007. Federal bond-approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2006 Revision, to reflect this change.

                    With respect to any bonds currently in force with the above listed company, bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted from this                           ( print page 31128)                        company, and bonds that are continuous in nature should not be renewed.                

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: May 24, 2007.

Vivian L. Cooper,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 07-2780 Filed 6-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 15-20382

Plaintiff,

v Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

PAUL NICOLETTI, M.J. Mona K. Mazoub

Defendant.

_____________________________

DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE OPINION

Defendant moved for discovery under FRCrP 16 and Brady of information

regarding three federal government investigations of mortgage wrongdoing at the

“victim” Fifth Third Bank during the run up to the financial crisis. The motion was

referred to the magistrate, who issued an Opinion and Order that the motion be denied. 

R 38. Defendant timely filed objections. R 39. The government filed a Response, R

42.

In its Response, the government correctly notes that the Sixth Circuit Pattern

Criminal Jury Instructions on fraud offenses contain a “person of ordinary prudence,”

or objective, standard. The government also concedes that there is a circuit split on

the issue, which it maintains has not been resolved by the Supreme Court. For

example, the pattern criminal jury instructions of the Fifth Circuit, Instruction 2.58A

and B, and of the Tenth Circuit, Instruction 2.58, use the definition from the Supreme 

1

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 43 Filed 01/23/17 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 494
Court decisions in Neder and Gaudin, that “a false statement is material if it has a

natural tendency to influence, or [is] capable of influencing, the decision of the

decisionmaking body to which it was addressed,” and do not reference a

hypothetically perfectly reasonable lender.

Defendant maintains the objective standard cannot be reconciled with Supreme

Court precedent holding that materiality requires a look at the decision maker. With

all respect to the Sixth Circuit, it does not have the prerogative to re-write Supreme

Court jurisprudence. While there may be a circuit split, that is simply due to some

circuits not following binding precedent.

For all the above reasons, Defendant requests that the Court grant Defendant’s

motion for discovery of the results of the government investigations of Fifth Third.

Dated: January 23, 2017 s/John Minock 

Attorney for Defendant

339 E. Liberty Street, Suite 200

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

734-668-2200; fax: 734-668-0416

jminock@cramerminock.com

2

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 43 Filed 01/23/17 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 495
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 15-20382

Plaintiff,

v Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

PAUL NICOLETTI, M.J. Mona K. Mazoub

Defendant.

_____________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 23, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing

document with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the attorneys of record.

s/John Minock 

3

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 43 Filed 01/23/17 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 496
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Automotive Body Parts

Association,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:15−cv−10137−LJM−SDD

Hon. Laurie J. Michelson

Ford Global Technologies, LLC,

Defendant(s),

NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a telephonic conference has been scheduled before

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti as follows:

• STATUS CONFERENCE: December 19, 2016 at 09:30 AM

 The conference shall be initiated by either party with opposing Counsel on the phone..

 If possible, please refrain from the use of cell phones. If a party wishes to be called at a

number other than the one listed on the docket, please give that information to the party

initiating the call.

 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: CONTINUATION of Settlement Conference.

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/M Williams 

Case Manager

Dated: December 6, 2016

2:15-cv-10137-LJM-SDD Doc # 41 Filed 12/05/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 766
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Foreignconsular offices in the United States.**
 
2006:Summer | Fall-Winter
2007 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:S 1.69/2:
Item Number:0863 (online) | 0863-A-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000483666
 
August 20, 2018
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Grayling Hofer, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 1, 2006  /s/ Grayling Hofer Grayling Hofer Chief Accounting Officer Principal Financial Officer
§ 502.148 Use of discovery procedures directed to Commission staff personnel. ( a ) Discovery procedures described in §§ 502.142 through 502.147, directed to Commission staff personnel must be permitted and must be governed by the procedures set forth in those sections except as modified by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. All notices to take depositions, written interrogatories, requests for production of documents and other things, requests for admissions, and any motions in connection with the foregoing, must be served on the Secretary of the Commission.
( b ) The General Counsel must designate an attorney to represent any Commission staff personnel to whom any discovery requests or motions are directed. The attorney so designated must not thereafter participate in the Commission's decision-making process concerning any issue in the proceeding.
( c ) Rulings of the presiding officer issued under paragraph (a) of this section must become final rulings of the Commission unless an appeal is filed within 10 days after date of issuance of such rulings or unless the Commission on its own motion reverses, modifies, or stays such rulings within 20 days of their issuance. Replies to appeals may be filed within 10 days. No motion for leave to appeal is necessary in such instances and no ruling of the presiding officer must be effective until 20 days from date of issuance unless the Commission otherwise directs. [Rule 208.]
[77 FR 61529, Oct. 10, 2012. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016; 81 FR 93837, Dec. 22, 2016]
|  |  |
|--|--|

| About            NCPC

            Commission Meeting Information

What's            New

Planning            Initiatives

Commission            Actions

Publications            & Press Releases

Information            for            Submitting Agencies

Home

  Publications &      Press Releases
Press      Releases � Publications

 
       
    Extending the Legacy
    This    document has been divided into 12 smaller files to promote ease of viewing.     Files on this page are in PDF format and require Adobe    Acrobat Reader 5.0.

AcknowledgmentsIntroduction    Chapter 1: A Framework for Change    Chapter 2: Building on the Past    Chapter 3: Unifying the City and the Core    Chapter 4: Museums, Memorials, and the Federal Workplace    Chapter 5: Waterfronts and Open Spaces    Chapter 6: Transportation    Chapter 7: Hometown and Region    Chapter 8: ImplementationConclusion and Planning PoliciesMap of Key Locations

         
Top of Page

 

401 9th Street, NW � North Lobby,      Suite 500 � Washington, D.C.      20576 � area map      Phone: (202) 482-7200 � Fax: (202) 482-7272 � Email:[email protected]accessibility � privacy, freedom of      information & disclosure�FAIR      Act�site      map

                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.2  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT This Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement (this Amendment), by and between Independence Holding Company, a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Mr. Scott M. Wood, an individual resident in the State of Arizona (Executive), is made as of August 7, 2007. Recitals A. Executive is employed by the Company as its Co-Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President, in accordance with the terms of that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2006, by and between the Company and Executive, as amended by agreements dated, respectively, as of June 15, 2006 and March 14, 2007 (collectively, and as so amended, the Existing Agreement). B. The parties hereto intend to amend the Existing Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. Terms and Conditions In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, along with other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 1. Amendment.Section 3(a) of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the term Three Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($325,000) with the term Three Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand Dollars ($364,000). 2. Retroactive Effect.The Company shallgive effect to this Amendment, retroactive to July 1, 2007. 3. Other Provisions.  Except as set forth above, all other provisions of the Existing Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 4. General Provisions.Each of the provisions of Sections 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the Existing Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference into this Amendment and applies equally with respect to this Amendment.  Except for the Existing Agreement and documents referenced therein, this Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and, upon its effectiveness, shall supersede any and all prior agreements, both oral and written, between Executive and the Company (or any of the Companys affiliates) with respect to such subject matter. [Signature page follows.]   1  Exhibit 10.2  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above. Independence Holding Company,Mr. Scott M. Wood,a Delaware corporationan individual resident in the State of ArizonaBy: /s/ Roy T.K. Thung/s/ Scott M. WoodTitle: Chief Executive Officer and President   2
# C_2012151EN.01001901.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Giurgiu (Romania) lodged on 6 March 2012 — SC Volksbank România S.A. v Comisariatul Județean pentru Protecția Consumatorilor Giurgiu

(Case C-123/12)

2012/C 151/33

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Giurgiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Volksbank România S.A.

Applicant:

Defendant: Comisariatul Județean pentru Protecția Consumatorilor Giurgiu

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 4(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that ‘main subject matter of the contract’ and ‘price’, as referred to in that provision, cover the elements which make up the consideration to which a credit institution is entitled by virtue of a consumer credit agreement, that is to say, the annual percentage rate of charge under a credit agreement, formed in particular by the interest rate, whether fixed or variable, bank commissions, and the other fees included and defined in the agreement? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 4(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that ‘main subject matter of the contract’ and ‘price’, as referred to in that provision, cover the elements which make up the consideration to which a credit institution is entitled by virtue of a consumer credit agreement, that is to say, the annual percentage rate of charge under a credit agreement, formed in particular by the interest rate, whether fixed or variable, bank commissions, and the other fees included and defined in the agreement?

1

| 2. | Can Article 4(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC be interpreted as permitting a Member State which has transposed that provision into national law to allow steps to be taken, in the exercise of judicial power, to check whether contractual terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract and the adequacy of the price are unfair? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can Article 4(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC be interpreted as permitting a Member State which has transposed that provision into national law to allow steps to be taken, in the exercise of judicial power, to check whether contractual terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract and the adequacy of the price are unfair?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

1

---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.11    
    


 
 
  IHS INC.
  2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
  
    2004 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD    
    


        Unless defined in this Restricted Stock Award (this "Award Document"), capitalized terms will have the same
meanings ascribed to them in the IHS Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the "Plan"). 



        Pursuant
to Section 8 of the Plan, you have been granted restricted Shares on the following terms and subject to the provisions of the Plan, which is incorporated by reference. In
the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Plan and this Award Document, the provisions of the Plan will prevail. 


Participant:  



Total Number of Shares Granted:  


Fair Market Value per Share:  


Total Fair Market Value of Award:  


Grant Date:  


Vesting Schedule:


        By
your signature and the signature of the Company's representative below, you and the Company agree that these Shares are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the
Plan and the terms and conditions set forth in the attached as Exhibit A. 



	
RECIPIENT	
 	

 	
 	
IHS INC.
	

    
	
 	

 	
 	

By:	

    

	    
 Print Name	 	 	 	Title:	    














QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.11


IHS INC. 2004 LONG–TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 2004 FORM OF RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 20, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us