alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This article contains summary information extracted from the year ended
February 29, 2000 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000827830
<NAME>                        Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1.00
<CASH>                                             180,125
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   190,113
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,511,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              194,201
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,317,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,511,679
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    54,009
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       36,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (128,830)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    146,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       146,652
<EPS-BASIC>                                            181
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31061 

[FR Doc. 07–2776 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 07–33] 

36b(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 07–33 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: May 29, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.002</GPH>
31062 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.003</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31063 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.004</GPH>
31064 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.005</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31065 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.006</GPH>
31066 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.007</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31067 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.008</GPH>
31068 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 07–2777 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.009</GPH>
#### Henry R. Cassel and another, Respondents, *v.*Daniel C. Fisk and others, *Appellants*.

Order of Special Term reversed, with costs, and injunction vacated. Opinion by

Ingalls, J.
§ 42.09-5 All vessels—division into types. ( a ) For the purposes of this part, each vessel to which this part applies is either a Type “A” or a Type “B” vessel.
( b ) A Type “A” vessel is a vessel that— ( 1 ) Is designed to carry only liquid cargoes in bulk;
( 2 ) Has a high degree of watertight and structural integrity of the deck exposed to the weather, with only small openings to cargo compartments that are closed by watertight gasketed covers of steel or other material considered equivalent by the Commandant; and
( 3 ) Has a low permeability of loaded cargo compartments.
( c ) A Type “B” vessel is any vessel that is not a Type “A” vessel.
( d ) Requirements governing the assignment of freeboards for Types “A” and “B” vessels are in subparts 42.20 and 42.25 of this part.
[CGD 79-153, 48 FR 38647, Aug. 25, 1983]
# C_2014159EN.01000801.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 April 2014 — French Republic v European Commission

(Case C-559/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - State aid - Aid in the form of an implied, unlimited guarantee in favour of La Poste as a result of its status as a publicly-owned establishment - Existence of the guarantee - Presence of State resources - Advantage - Burden and standard of proof))

2014/C 159/10

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Gstalter and by J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2012 in Case T 154/10 France v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by the French Republic for the annulment of Commission Decision 2010/605/EU of 26 January 2010 on State aid C 56/07 (ex E 15/05) granted by France to La Poste (OJ 2010 L 274, p. 1) — Aid allegedly implemented by France in the form of an unlimited implied guarantee in favour of La Poste resulting from its status as a publicly owned industrial and commercial establishment — Establishment outside the scope of the ordinary law on administration and compulsory liquidation of firms in difficulty — Existence of an advantage — Existence of a transfer of State resources — Burden and standard of proof — Equiparation of the conditions under which State liability is incurred with a guarantee mechanism

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on date hereof (the Report), I, Mary K. Murray, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MARY K. MURRAY                               
|Mary K. Murray                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 17, 2004                                      



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 190.25-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart with the exception of § 190.25-90, apply to all vessels contracted for on or after July 1, 1969.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to July 1, 1969 shall meet the requirements of § 190.25-90.
[CGFR 69-72, 34 FR 17503, Oct. 29, 1969]
Case 2:15-cv-11315-AC-DRG ECF No. 5 filed 05/11/15 PageID.92 Page 1 of 1
Register.com, Inc.
                                575 Eighth Avenue
                               New York, NY 10018

                                February 6, 2005

Mr. James A. Mitarotonda
Barington Companies Equity Partners, L.P.
888 Seventh Avenue
New York NY 10019

Gentlemen:

          This letter is to memorialize our mutual understanding as to the
following matters, in light of the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors
of Register.com, Inc. (the "Company") at a meeting of the Company's Board of
Directors today:

1.   In the event that any of the following shall occur: (i) one new director of
     the Company is not recommended by the Nominating Committee (consisting of
     directors who presently are on such committee or, if one of such members is
     not able to so serve, Reggie Van Lee) and added to the Board by February
     15, 2005, (ii) a second new director is not recommended by the Nominating
     Committee (consisting of directors who presently are on such committee or,
     if one of such members is not able to so serve, Reggie Van Lee) and added
     to the Board by February 28, 2005, or (iii) a new Chief Executive Officer
     candidate has not been recommended by the Search Committee (consisting of
     directors who presently are on such committee) and approved by the Board by
     March 30, 2005 (to assume such position within 30 days thereof or such
     other date as the Board may unanimously decide), in each case in accordance
     with such Board resolutions, then the Company will set the date for the
     2005 annual meeting at no earlier than July 20, 2005.

2.   The Company agrees that the reference to 8% in Section 6 of the agreement
     between us dated as of June 9, 2003 shall be amended to be 15%, effective
     immediately.

          If this letter reflects our agreement, please sign in the space
indicated below and return a copy to me.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             REGISTER.COM, INC.


                                             By: /s/ Mitchell I. Quain
                                                 -------------------------------

Agreed:

BARINGTON COMPANIES
EQUITY PARTNERS, L.P.

     By:  Barington Companies Investors, LLC,
          its general partner

By: /s/ James A. Mitarotonda
    -----------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 9, 2011
/s/ Emile A. BattatEmile A. BattatChief Executive Officer
 
 
 The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not for any other purpose.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1585

To expand the boundary of the Modoc National Forest to include lands

presently owned by the Bank of California, N.A. Trustee, to facilitate

a land exchange with the Forest Service, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 1995

Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundary of the Modoc National Forest to

include lands presently owned by the Bank of California,

N.A. Trustee, to facilitate a land exchange with the

Forest Service, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modoc National Forest

5 Boundary Adjustment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:
2

HR 1585 IH

1 (1) Certain private lands presently owned by

2 the Bank of California, N.A. Trustee, are adjacent

3 to the Modoc National Forest and are logical exten4 sions of the forest.

5 (2) A boundary adjustment will facilitate a land

6 exchange which involves approximately 4,240 acres

7 of National Forest land and 11,804 acres of private

8 land, of which only 760 acres are outside the present

9 Modoc National Forest boundary.

10 (3) Bank of California, N.A. Trustee, and the

11 Forest Service are prepared to exchange these lands

12 under existing authority of the Secretary of Agri13 culture which will benefit both the private land14 owners and the United States by consolidating their

15 respective landownership patterns, providing reduced

16 costs for each party in implementing their land man17 agement objectives, providing increased recreation

18 opportunities and fishery habitat for the American

19 public, and providing commercial timber lands to the

20 private landowners.

21 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Modoc Na23 tional Forest is hereby modified to include and encompass

24 760 acres, more or less, on the following described lands:

25 Mount Diablo Meridian, Lassen County, California, T. 38
3

HR 1585 IH

N., R. 10 E., sec. 5, SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1 1 ⁄4; sec. 8,

E1⁄2NE1⁄4, NE1⁄4NW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SE1⁄4; sec. 16, W1 2 ⁄2; sec.

25, Lots 13, 14 and 15 (S1⁄2SW1⁄4, SW1⁄4SE1 3 ⁄4); T. 37

N., R. 11 E., sec. 20, NW1⁄4SE1 4 ⁄4.

5 (b) RULE FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION

6 FUND.—For the purposes of section 7 of the Land and

7 Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–

8 9), the boundary of the Modoc National Forest, as modi9 fied by this Act, shall be considered to be the boundary

10 of that National Forest as of January 1, 1965.

Æ
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 24, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for  Quarter of 2009 ()

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EVELYN WILKEWITZ,

Plaintiff, Case Number 15-12425

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT CONTROL, INC.,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties,

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: March 7, 2016

Stipulated to by:

s/ Travis L. Shackelford (w/consent)

Travis L. Shackelford (P68710)

Attorney for Plaintiff

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Tel: (248) 353-2882

travis@micreditlawyer.com

s/ Charity A. Olson

Charity A. Olson (P68295)

Attorneys for Defendant

2723 S. State St., Ste. 150

Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Tel: (734) 222-5179

colson@olsonlawpc.com

Case 2:15-cv-12425-DML-RSW ECF No. 11 filed 03/07/16 PageID.55 Page 1 of 2
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on March 7, 2016.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-

Case 2:15-cv-12425-DML-RSW ECF No. 11 filed 03/07/16 PageID.56 Page 2 of 2
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.6 Assistant Clerk]
[Page 416]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.6  assistant clerk

  The SPEAKER laid before the House the following communication, which 
was read as follows:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                   Washington, DC, March 16, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Under Clause 4 of Rule III of the Rules 
     of the U.S. House of Representatives, in addition to Ms. 
     Linda Nave, Deputy Clerk, I herewith designate Mr. Jeffrey 
     Trandahl, Assistant Clerk, to sign any and all papers and do 
     all other acts for me under the name of the Clerk of the 
     House which he would be authorized to do by virtue of this 
     designation, except such as are provided by statute, in case 
     of my temporary absence or disability.
       This designation shall remain in effect for the 104th 
     Congress or until modified by me.
       With great respect, I am
           Sincerely yours,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
                                                            Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 287
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

§ 287.26 Reports by taxpayers. ( a ) *Information required.* With each income tax return filed for a taxable year during any part of which a construction reserve fund is in existence the taxpayer shall submit a statement setting forth a detailed analysis of such fund. The statement, which need not be on any prescribed form, shall include the following information with respect to the construction reserve fund: ( 1 ) The actual balance in the fund at the beginning and end of the taxable year;
( 2 ) The date, amount, and source of each deposit during the taxable year;
( 3 ) If any deposit referred to in paragraph (a)(2) of this section consists of proceeds from the sale, or indemnification of loss, of a vessel or share thereof, the amounts of the unrecognized gain;
( 4 ) The date, amount, and purpose of each expenditure or withdrawal from the fund; and
( 5 ) The date and amount of each contract, under which deposited funds are deemed to be obligated during the taxable year, for the construction, reconstruction, reconditioning, or acquisition of new vessels, or for the liquidation of purchase-money indebtedness on such vessels, and the identification of such vessels.
( b ) *Records required.* Taxpayers shall keep such records and make such additional reports as the Commissioner of Internal Revenue or the Administration may require.
Note:
The records referred to in this section shall be retained for a period of six months beyond the termination or closing out of the reserve fund.
#### The National Park Bank of New York, *Appellant, v.*Leman B. Hotchkiss and others, *Respondents.*Same *v.*Same.

Judgment in each case affirmed, with bill of costs in one case only, and disbursements in both. Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Smith, P. J., takes no part in the decision.
#### JANE MEEKER, PLAINTIFF, v. PHOEBE HEDDEN JOHNSON ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October 13, 1928

Decided March 11, 1929.

Before Justices Trénchard, Kalisch and Lloyd.

For the rule, *Congleton, Stallman & Hoover.*

*Contra, Sorg, Duncan & Bailey (George B. Bailey,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

This case involves a collision between a motor car driven by defendant Phoebe Hedden Johnson and the plaintiff, who was a pedestrian on Main street in the city of East Orange.

*267The plaintiff had a verdict and the defendant Phoebe Hedden Johnson obtained this rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside.

The plaintiff’s proofs tended to show that the plaintiff, a mature woman, after doing some shopping on the north side of Main street, walked east along the Main street sidewalk to a point where Lincoln avenue intersects Main street but does not extend beyond the north side thereof. The accident occurre’d at five-thirty p. m. on November 13th, 1923. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that having reached the crosswalk of Main street, she looked both ways for traffic and saw no moving vehicles. She then started across the crosswalk of Main street and had got perhaps a little more than half way across when she was struck and injured by the automobile driven by the defendant.

This automobile of the defendants had been proceeding north on Lincoln avenue, and the driver wishing to make a turn west on Main street, instead of making a wide turn, made a short turn and so hit the plaintiff.

It seems to us, therefore, that if the plaintiff’s testimony is to be believed, she was justified in starting across the street at the time and in the manner that she did, and that it was open to the jury to find that the defendants’ negligence (in view of traffic regulations and plaintiff’s rights) caused the accident.

On the other hand, if defendants’ proof was to be believed, it might perhaps be said that defendant was not guilty of negligence, and that plaintiff’s contributory negligence was the cause of the injury.

In this state of the proof the only argument made before us is that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Our careful examination of the evidence results in the conclusion that we cannot say that the jury’s finding with respect to the negligence of the defendant and want of contributory negligence of the plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence.

The result is that the rule to show cause will be discharged.