alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - May

2012

**Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 5/7/12 5/14/12 5/21/12 5/28/12 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units**  **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 2.89 1.85 0.551 1.58

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ LOD = limit of detection = 0.0283 ug/L LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 5/14/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 5/14/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 09000064810e6d84.xls:Sheet1 8/21/2012 2:11 PM
# C_2011139EN.01002401.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/24

---

Action brought on 11 March 2011 — TMS Trademark-Schutzrechtsverwertungsgesellschaft v OHIM

(Case T-152/11)

2011/C 139/45

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TMS Trademark-Schutzrechtsverwertungsgesellschaft mbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: B. Hein and M.-H. Hoffmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Comercial Jacinto Parera, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 December 2010 in Case R 449/2009-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 December 2010 in Case R 449/2009-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred during the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred during the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Figurative mark ‘MAD’ for goods in Class 25.

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Comercial Jacinto Parera, SA.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection in part of the claim.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 15 and Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) and of Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2968/95, (2) in that the Board of Appeal should not have reached the conclusion on the basis of the documents submitted as proof of use that the figurative mark ‘MAD’ is in genuine use for ‘items of clothing’.

Pleas in law:

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).

2

---
§ 58.30-25 Accumulators. ( a ) An accumulator is an unfired pressure vessel in which energy is stored under high pressure in the form of a gas or a gas and hydraulic fluid. Accumulators must meet the applicable requirements in part 54 of this subchapter.
( b ) If the accumulator is of the gas and fluid type, suitable separators must be provided between the two media, if their mixture would be dangerous, or would result in contamination of the hydraulic fluid and loss of gas through absorption.
( c ) Each accumulator which may be isolated, must be protected on the gas and fluid sides by relief valves set to relieve at pressures not exceeding the maximum allowable working pressures. When an accumulator forms an integral part of systems having relief valves, the accumulator need not have individual relief valves.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR-73,771-05

KEVIN TERRELL TATUM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1042008-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. 

Tatum v. State,No. 01-06-01190-CR (Tex. App—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 29, 2008)(not designated

for publication). 

Applicant filed his initial habeas application with the Harris County District Clerk on

September 10, 2009. On September 5, 2013, before this Court received the application, Applicant
2

filed a “Motion for Leave to Supplement Writ with Annexed Affidavit” with the Harris County

District Clerk. In the supplement, Applicant raised one ground of actual innocence and attached an

affidavit from an eyewitness. Applicant did not file this supplement on the form, which is required

for it to be properly filed and considered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.1(a); 73.2. 

This Court received Applicant’s application on October 27, 2014 and denied relief without

a written order on March 19, 2014. Though the supplemental ground was appropriately filed in the

trial court, it was not presented on the 11.07 form. This rendered the -05 habeas application noncompliant with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Therefore, we now withdraw the denial of Applicant’s -05 application, reconsider the case

on our own motion, and dismiss the -05 application as non-compliant. Applicant is free to file

another writ application that is compliant with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

Filed: April 15, 2015

Do not publish
<PAGE>
 
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Capital Re Corporation, a Delaware insurance holding company;

Credit Re Corporation, a Maryland corporation;

Capital Re LLC, a Turks and Caicos limited life company;

Capital Reinsurance Company, a Maryland domiciled insurance company;

Capital Credit Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company;

Capital Mortgage Reinsurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company;

Capital Title Reinsurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company;

KRE Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company

Capital Re Management Corporation, a New York reinsurance intermediary

Capital Re (UK) Holdings

CRC Capital, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of England

RGB Holdings, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of England

RGB Underwriting Services, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
 England

RGB Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
 England

C.I. de Rougemont Group Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
 England

C.I. de Rougemont & Co. Ltd., a corporation established under the Laws of
 England

ACE Capital Re Managers Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled managing general agency

ACE Capital Re Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled insurance company

Lenders Mortgage Alliance Company LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 9, 1995 (41), Para 41.29 Order of Business--Printing of Amendments--H.R. 1158 and H.R. 1159]
[Page 364]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.41.29  order of business--printing of amendments--h.r. 1158 and 
          h.r. 1159

  On motion of Mr. SOLOMON, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That it may be in order for Members to have until 5 o'clock 
p.m., Monday, March 13, 1995, to submit amendments for printing in the 
Congressional Record on the bill (H.R. 1158) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for additional disaster assistance and 
making recissions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for 
other purposes, and the bill (H.R. 1159) making supplemental 
appropriations and rescissions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1995, and for other purposes.
```
31058 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 

ACCOMMODATIONS: Anyone who needs 

an interpreter or other accommodation 

should notify the Corporation’s contact 

person by 5 p.m. on Monday, June 11, 

2007. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Rachel Needle, Office of the CEO, 

Corporation for National and 

Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 

10205, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 

606–6742. Fax (202) 606–3460. TDD: 

(202) 606–3472. E-mail: 

rneedle@cns.gov. 

Dated: May 31, 2007. 

Frank R. Trinity, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07–2808 Filed 6–1–07; 1:34 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 07–25] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 07–25 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: May 29, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31059 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.000</GPH>
31060 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.001</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Notices 31061 

[FR Doc. 07–2776 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 07–33] 

36b(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 07–33 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: May 29, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN05JN07.002</GPH>
#### § 4.05-20 Report of accident to aid to navigation.

Whenever a vessel collides with a buoy, or other aid to navigation under the jurisdiction of the Coast Guard, or is connected with any such collision, it shall be the duty of the person in charge of such vessel to report the accident to the nearest Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. No report on Form CG-2692 is required unless one or more of the results listed in § 4.05-1 occur.

[CGD 74-119, 39 FR 33317, Sept. 17, 1974, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34533, Sept. 7, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 287

#### Editorial Note:

The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

#### § 287.21 Period for construction of certain vessels.

A new vessel constructed otherwise than under the provisions of Title V of the Act, and not purchased from the Administration must, within six months from the date of the construction contract, or within the period of any extension, be completed to the extent of not less than 5 percent as estimated by the Administration and certified by it to the Secretary of the Treasury. In case of a contract covering more than one vessel it will be sufficient if one of the vessels is 5 percent completed within the six months' period from the date of the contract or within the period of any extension, and so certified. All construction must be completed with reasonable dispatch as determined by the Administration. If, for causes within the control of the taxpayer, the entire construction is not completed with reasonable dispatch, the Administration will so certify to the Secretary of the Treasury. For the effect of such certification, see § 287.23.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000700815
<NAME> GOLDEN MAPLE MINING AND LEACHING COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,711
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        (197,541)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,013
<OTHER-SE>                                    (249,843)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,711
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (16)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (16)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (16)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independence Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 9, 2007   /s/ Roy T.K. Thung* Roy T. K. Thung Chief Executive Officer and President   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
The Attorney General of Texas 

July 10, 1980 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Honorable H. S. Harris, Jr. 

Chairman 

Texas Industrial Accident Board 

200 East Riverside Drive 

Austin, Texas 78704 

Opinion No. BW-211 

Re: Responsibilities of the Texas 

State Library in storage of records 

Dear Mr. Harris: 

You have requested our opinion regarding the duty of the Texas State 

Library in the storage of records. Article 5441d, V.T.C.S., denominates the 

Director of the Records Management Division of the Texas State Library & 

Archives Commission as the “Records Preservation Office.” Sections 4, 5. 

He is required to preserve certain “essential records,” among them: 

(2)... Records to protect the rights and interests 

of individuals, or to establish and affirm the powers 

and &ties of government in the resumption of 

operation after a disaster. 

Section 7. The originating sgency has the responsibility for determining 

which of its records shall be deemed “essential,” in accordance with the 

statutory guidelines. Section 9. When such a designation has been made, the 

Records Preservation Officer must store at least one copy of the record, or 

its preservation duplicate, “in the safest possible location . . . [and1 in a 

place other than the legally designated or customary record storage 

location.” Section 12. If he chooses to preserve the records in the form of 

preservation duplicates, he must comply with the requirements of section 10 

of article 5441d 

The statute, while clearly directing the Records Preservation Officer 

to perform certain acts in the preservation and storage of records, does not 

establish a deadline for earryirg out those instructions, so a reasonable time 

period is contemplated. 

P. 676 
Honorable H. S. Harris, Jr. - Page Two (NW-211) 

SUMMARY 

Article 5441d, V.T.C.S., requires the Records Preservation 

Officer described therein to store at least one copy or 

“preservation duplicate” of any record determined to be 

“essential” by the originating agency. 

A= 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

TED L. HARTLEY 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Rick Gilpin 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Eva Loutzenhiser 

Bruce Youngblood 

p. 677
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 30021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 26, 2007, 12 p.m. to 
June 26, 2007, 1:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on May 21, 2007, 72 FR 28515-28517.
    The meeting title has been change to ``CIHB Member Special Emphasis 
Panel''. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: May 22, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2668 Filed 5-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CompuMed, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. McLaughlin,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   John G. McLaughlin          |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| John   G. McLaughlin              |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| February  11, 2003                     |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000800

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

YOLANDA NUNEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

RICHARD MCGOUGH, et al., Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 16-1-619(KKH))

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the "Stipulation for Dismissal

with Prejudice of Appeal" (Stipulation), filed April 14, 2020, by

Defendants-Appellees Richard McGough and Polani, Inc., the papers

in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the parties

stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own

attorneys' fees and costs; (2) the Stipulation is dated and

signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal;

(3) the appeal was docketed after the parties filed the

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000800

30-APR-2020

10:05 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Stipulation; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai)i Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is

approved, and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The

parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 30, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

2