alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012303EN.01000802.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/8

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Abd Aziz Tam

(Case C-74/12) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - No description of the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 303/16

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Giudice di Pace di Revere

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

Abd Aziz Tam

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and of Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a third-country national who has entered or stayed in the country illegally — Admissibility of the criminal offence of illegal stay — Possibility of substituting the fine with an order for expulsion with immediate effect for a period of at least five years or with a home detention (‘permanenza domiciliare’) sentence — Obligations of the Member States during the period prescribed for the transposition of a directive

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy), by decision of 26 January 2012, is clearly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Cortina Ann Gater,

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 2:15-cv-10033-NGE-MJH

 Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

Russell Collection Agency,

Incorporated,

Defendant(s).

_____________________/

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

Plaintiff Cortina Ann Gater and Defendant Russell Collection Agency, 

Incorporated, through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, that the abovecaptioned action be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own 

attorney’s fees and costs.

Respectfully Submitted,

By:/s/ Stephen A. Thomas

Stephen A. Thomas (P43260)

Attorney for Plaintiff

645 Griswold St., Suite 1360

Detroit, MI 48226

Phone: (313) 965-2265

sthomas@313965bank.com

By: /s/ Charity A. Olson

Charity A. Olson (P68295)

OLSON LAW GROUP

Attorney for Defendant

2723 S. State St., Suite 150

Ann Arbor, MI 48104

T: (734) 222-5179

F: (866) 941-8712

colson@olsonlawpc.com

Case 2:15-cv-10033-NGE-MJH ECF No. 22 filed 04/15/16 PageID.208 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Cortina Ann Gater,

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 2:15-cv-10033-NGE-MJH

 Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

Russell Collection Agency,

Incorporated,

Defendant(s).

_____________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this matter is hereby DISMISSED with 

prejudice and with no award of costs or attorney’s fees to either party. 

SO ORDERED. 

Date: April 15, 2016 s/ Nancy G. Edmunds 

 U.S. District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-10033-NGE-MJH ECF No. 22 filed 04/15/16 PageID.209 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 7, 2008

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|OHIO HERITAGE BANK | * Branch       | Ohio Heritage Bank, Coshocton, OH to establish a branch at 1066 Hebron Road, Heath, OH. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | Not available 
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 308.528 Surety Bond A, Form MA-308.

The Standard Form of Surety Bond A, Form MA-308, which may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD, shall be used by an Assured who elects to post a surety bond as security for payment of the premiums pursuant to Clause 21 of the policy:
§ 67.239 Requirements for assumptions of mortgages. An assumption of mortgage presented for filing and recording must: ( a ) Be signed by or on behalf of each original mortgagor, each mortgagee, and each assuming party; and
( b ) Recite the following: ( 1 ) The name and address of each original mortgagor and the interest in the vessel mortgaged; and
( 2 ) The name and address of each assuming party and the interest in the mortgage assumed.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, March 10, 1995 (42), Para 42.19 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 373]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.42.19  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. THOMAS: Committee on House Oversight. House Resolution 
     107. Resolution providing amounts for the expenses of certain 
     committees of the House of Representatives in the 104th 
     Congress; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-74). Referred to 
     the House Calendar.
       Mr. GOODLING: Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities. H.R. 999. A bill to establish a single, 
     consolidated source of Federal child care funding; to 
     establish a program to provide block grants to States to 
     provide nutrition assistance to economically disadvantaged 
     individuals and families and to establish a program to 
     provide block grants to States to provide school-based food 
     services to students; to restrict alien eligibility for 
     certain education, training, and other programs; and for 
     other purposes; with an amendment (Rept. No. 104-75, Pt. 1). 
     Ordered to be printed.
```
#### Cuyahoga County Bar Association *v.*Clower.

[Cite as *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Clower*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 151.]

(No. 98-1301

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*152
      *John D. Sutula, Thomas E. Kocovsky, Jr.*and *Ellen S. Mandell,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We have reviewed the record in this matter, and we observe that we publicly reprimanded respondent in *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Clower*
      *153(1989), 41 Ohio St.3d 601, 533 N.E.2d 1058. We also note respondent’s complete failure to cooperate with this investigation and to rectify his clients’ complaints. Accordingly, we permanently disbar respondent from the practice of law and tax costs to him.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 381
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 2 of 9 Pg ID 382
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 3 of 9 Pg ID 383
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 4 of 9 Pg ID 384
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 5 of 9 Pg ID 385
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 6 of 9 Pg ID 386
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 7 of 9 Pg ID 387
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 8 of 9 Pg ID 388
2:15-cv-11169-PDB-APP Doc # 25 Filed 09/28/16 Pg 9 of 9 Pg ID 389
#### § 535.902 Falsification of reports.

Knowing falsification of any report required by the Act or this part, including knowing falsification of any item in any applicable agreement information and/or reporting requirements pursuant to subparts E and G of this part, is a violation of the rules of this part and is subject to the civil penalties set forth in section 13(a) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 41107) and may be subject to the criminal penalties provided for in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

[69 FR 64414, Nov. 4, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 50730, Oct. 1, 2009]
****HAITI UPDATE**

Donald E. Schulz

January 29, 1997

The views expressed in this report are those of the author and donot necessarily reflect the official policy or position of theDepartment of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S.Government.

**FOREWORD**

**
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending March 14, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GOLDEN SKY SYSTEMS, INC. AT MARCH
31, 1999 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001070669
<NAME> GOLDEN SKY SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (252)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,252
<PP&E>                                           9,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,983)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,074
<BONDS>                                        239,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,416
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,935)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Argued and submitted November 29, 1995,

affirmed January 3,

petition for review denied May 7, 1996 (323 Or 264)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*GARY RAYMOND KELLEY, *Appellant.*

(F93-020117C; CA A85385)

909 P2d 216

Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Ann F. Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Merrill,*135 Or App 408, 899 P2d 712, *rev allowed*322 Or 193 (1995).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,306
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               70
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,400
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,306
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,721)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.16 Welfare Reform]
[Pages 418-419]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.16  welfare reform

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DOOLITTLE, pursuant to House Resolution 
117 and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of 
the Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4) to restore the American fam

[[Page 419]]

ily, reduce illegitimacy, control welfare spending, and reduce welfare 
dependence.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. DOOLITTLE, by unanimous consent, 
designated Mr. LINDER as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole; and 
after some time spent therein,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. INGLIS, assumed the Chair.
  When Mr. LINDER, Chairman, reported that the Committee, having had 
under consideration said bill, had come to no resolution thereon.
```
§ 502.209 Prehearing conference. ( a ) ( 1 ) Prior to any hearing, the Commission or presiding officer may direct all interested parties, by written notice, to attend one or more prehearing conferences for the purpose of considering any settlement under § 502.91, formulating the issues in the proceeding, and determining other matters to aid in its disposition. In addition to any offers of settlement or proposals of adjustment, the following may be considered: ( i ) Simplification of the issues;
( ii ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings;
( iii ) The possibility of obtaining admissions of fact and of documents that will avoid unnecessary proof;
( iv ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( v ) The procedure to be used at the hearing;
( vi ) The distribution to the parties prior to the hearing of written testimony and exhibits;
( vii ) Consolidation of the examination of witnesses by counsel;
( viii ) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the proceeding.
( 2 ) Prior to the hearing, the presiding officer may require exchange of exhibits and any other material that may expedite the hearing. The presiding officer will assume the responsibility of accomplishing the purposes of the notice of prehearing conference so far as this may be possible without prejudice to the rights of any party.
( 3 ) The presiding officer will rule upon all matters presented for decision, orally upon the record when feasible, or by subsequent ruling in writing. If a party determines that a ruling made orally does not cover fully the issue presented, or is unclear, such party may file a motion requesting a further ruling within ten (10) days after receipt of the transcript.
( b ) In any proceeding under the rules in this part, the presiding officer hold an informal conference prior to the taking of testimony, or may recess the hearing for such a conference, with a view to carrying out the purposes of this section.
( c ) At any prehearing conference, consideration may be given to whether the use of alternative dispute resolution would be appropriate or useful for the disposition of the proceeding whether or not there has been previous consideration of such use. [Rule 209.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000701258
<NAME> SUPER 8 MOTELS NORTHWEST II
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         504,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               672,038
<PP&E>                                       6,052,734
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,695,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,061,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          404,202
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,061,492
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,867,033
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  800,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               948,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                933,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            933,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   933,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   207.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   207.48
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.
COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Each of the undersigned, Thomas G. Hudson and Gregory T. Barnum, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of ComputerNetwork Technology Corporation (the “Company”), individually and not jointlyhas executed this Certification in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004 (the “Report”).
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:
 • the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 • the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Certification asof the 7th day of September, 2004.    /s/ Thomas G. Hudson   Thomas G. Hudson Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Gregory T. Barnum   Gregory T. Barnum Chief Financial Officer
A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHERDOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THATAPPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENTREQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGYCORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ANDFURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON ITS WRITTEN REQUEST.