# C_2013344EN.01003602.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/36

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — European Commission v Guido Strack

(Case C-579/12 RX-II) (1)

1

(Review of the judgment of the General Court in Case T-268/11 P - Civil service - Commission decision refusing to carry over paid annual leave not taken by an official during the reference period because of long term sick leave - Article 1e(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 4 of Annex V to those Regulations - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 7 - Right to paid annual leave - Principle of the social law of the European Union - Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Effect on the unity and consistency of European Union law)

2013/C 344/63

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Guido Strack

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Review of the judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2012 in Case T-268/11 P Commission v Strack

Commission

Strack

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Appeal Chamber) of 8 November 2012 in Case T-268/11 P Commission v Strack adversely affects the unity and consistency of European Union law inasmuch as the General Court, as an appeal court, disregarding the right to paid annual leave as a principle of the social law of the European Union also expressly affirmed by Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, referred to by Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, as interpreted by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union:






  — | interpreted Article 1e(2) of the Staff Regulations to the effect that it does not include the requirements relating to the organisation of working time contained in Directive 2003/88, in particular, paid annual leave, and |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Appeal Chamber) of 8 November 2012 in Case T-268/11 P Commission v Strack adversely affects the unity and consistency of European Union law inasmuch as the General Court, as an appeal court, disregarding the right to paid annual leave as a principle of the social law of the European Union also expressly affirmed by Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, referred to by Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, as interpreted by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union:

—

interpreted Article 1e(2) of the Staff Regulations to the effect that it does not include the requirements relating to the organisation of working time contained in Directive 2003/88, in particular, paid annual leave, and

| — | consequently, interpreted Article 4 of Annex V to those regulations as implying that the right to carry over annual leave exceeding the limit laid down in that provision may be granted only where the official has been unable to take leave for reasons connected with his activity as an official and the duties he has thus been required to perform. |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, interpreted Article 4 of Annex V to those regulations as implying that the right to carry over annual leave exceeding the limit laid down in that provision may be granted only where the official has been unable to take leave for reasons connected with his activity as an official and the duties he has thus been required to perform.

| 2. | Sets aside that judgment of the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets aside that judgment of the General Court of the European Union.

| 3. | Dismisses the appeal brought by the European Commission against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 15 March 2011 in Case F-120/07 Strack v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the appeal brought by the European Commission against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 15 March 2011 in Case F-120/07 Strack v Commission.

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs which Mr Strack incurred both in the review proceedings and in the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs which Mr Strack incurred both in the review proceedings and in the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union.

| 5. | Declares that the Council of the European Union and the European Commission shall bear their own costs incurred in the review proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Declares that the Council of the European Union and the European Commission shall bear their own costs incurred in the review proceedings.

| 6. | Declares that the European Commission shall bear its own costs incurred in the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Declares that the European Commission shall bear its own costs incurred in the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.

1

---