alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending May 15, 2010

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|SMARTBANK         | * Branch       | SmartBank, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, to establish a branch located at 639 Dolly Parton Parkway, Sevierville, Tennessee. | Newspaper:05/21/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 05/21/2010    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



EXHIBIT 11 COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Statement Re: Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Basic and Diluted shares
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited) Weighted AverageNet Income (Loss)
    
    Shares Outstanding
    
    Per share AmountThree Months Ended October 31, 2004:Basic
    
    $
    (90,326
    )
    
    
    28,309
    
    
    $
    (3.19
    )Dilutive effect of employee
awards and options and convertible notes(1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Diluted
    
    $
    (90,326
    )
    
    
    28,309
    
    
    $
    (3.19
    )Three Months Ended October 31, 2003:Basic
    
    $
    237
    
    
    
    27,193
    
    
    $
    .01Dilutive effect of employee
awards and options and convertible notes
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,557
    
    
    
    Diluted
    
    $
    237
    
    
    
    28,750
    
    
    $
    .01Nine Months Ended October 31, 2004:Basic
    
    $
    (106,991
    )
    
    
    27,800
    
    
    $
    (3.85
    )Dilutive effect of employee
awards and options and convertible notes(1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Diluted
    
    $
    (106,991
    )
    
    
    27,800
    
    
    $
    (3.85
    )Nine Months Ended October 31, 2003:Basic
    
    $
    (27,667
    )
    
    
    27,047
    
    
    $
    (1.02
    )Dilutive effect of employee
awards and options and convertible notes(1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Diluted
    
    $
    (27,667
    )
    
    
    27,047
    
    
    $
    (1.02
    )
 (1) Potential dilutive securities, consisting of convertible notes,
outstanding stock options and shares issuable under the employee stock purchase
plan, are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share due to
their anti-dilutive effect. 30
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending July 8, 2006

----

Discount RatesDiscount and Advance Rates  -- increase in the primary credit rate from 6 percent to 6-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.					-Approved, July 6, 2006 					

EnforcementProgress Bancshares, Inc., Sullivan, Missouri, and Progress Bank of Missouri  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order.					-Announced, July 5, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: July 13, 2006
*Thursday, November 12, 1998*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-2194.

#### In re Motion to Quash of Bailey.

This cause is pending before the court on a motion to quash of Donald L. Bailey. Upon consideration of the motion-to quash subpoena *duces tecum*and on motion for stay of subpoena *duces tecum*pending decision on motion to quash,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to quash and motion for stay be, and hereby are, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the inclusion in Item 8 of this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Rockford Corporation of our report dated February 19, 2001 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of the
Company for each of the three years ended December 31, 2000.

         We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-48076) pertaining to the 1994 and 1997 Stock Option
Plans and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Rockford Corporation of our
report dated February 19, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule for each of the three years ended
December 31, 2000 included in Item 8 of this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Rockford Corporation.

                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
March 12, 2001
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2397 

To amend title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to require 

a plaintiff to provide a defendant with an opportunity to correct a 

violation of such title voluntarily before the plaintiff may commence 

a civil action, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2009 

Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act 

of 1990 to require a plaintiff to provide a defendant 

with an opportunity to correct a violation of such title 

voluntarily before the plaintiff may commence a civil 

action, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ADA Notification Act 

5 of 2009’’. 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2397 IH

1 SEC. 2. OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ALLEGED VIOLATION 

2 AS CONDITION ON COMMENCING CIVIL AC3 TION. 

4 Section 308(a) of the Americans with Disabilities Act 

5 of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12188(a)) is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ALLEGED VIO8 LATION.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A State or Federal 

10 court shall not have jurisdiction in a civil action 

11 that a plaintiff commences under paragraph 

12 (1), or under a State law that conditions a vio13 lation of any of its provisions on a violation of 

14 this title, unless— 

15 ‘‘(i) before filing a complaint alleging 

16 a violation of this title or such a State law, 

17 the plaintiff provides the defendant with a 

18 written notice of the alleged violation by 

19 registered mail; 

20 ‘‘(ii) the written notice identifies the 

21 facts that constitute the alleged violation, 

22 including the location where and the date 

23 on which the alleged violation occurred; 

24 ‘‘(iii) a remedial period of 90 days 

25 elapses after the date on which the plain26 tiff provides the written notice; 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2397 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) the written notice informs the 

2 defendant that the plaintiff is barred from 

3 filing the complaint until the end of the re4 medial period; and 

5 ‘‘(v) the complaint states that, as of 

6 the date on which the complaint is filed, 

7 the defendant has not corrected the alleged 

8 violation. 

9 ‘‘(B) EXTENSION OF REMEDIAL PERIOD.— 

10 The court may extend the remedial period by 

11 not more than 30 days if the defendant applies 

12 for such an extension.’’. 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Fortado.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1223.]

(No. 95-1665

Submitted and decided December 22, 1998.)

On Application for Termination of Probation.

On February 28, 1996, this court suspended respondent, Matthew Fortado, for two years, with one year to be stayed on conditions. On August 22, 1997, the court stayed the last year of his two-year suspension and placed him on probation for a period of one year on conditions. On August 24, 1998, respondent filed an application for termination of probation.

*1224The court comes now to consider its order of August 22, 1997, and finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(9).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Matthew Fortado, Attorney Registration No. 0010597, last known address in Akron, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier cases, see *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1518, 692 N.E.2d 1021; *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1232, 683 N.E.2d 782; and *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado*(1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 604, 660 N.E.2d 1154.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit  32.1



                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: April 26, 2004                    By /s/ L.S. Smith
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           L.S. Smith, Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
§ 78.37-3 Logbooks and records. ( a ) The master or person in charge of a vessel that is required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook shall maintain the logbook on form CG-706. When the voyage is completed, the master or person in charge shall file the logbook with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) The master or person in charge of a vessel that is not required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook, shall maintain, on board, an unofficial logbook or record in any form desired for the purposes of making entries therein as required by law or regulations in this subchapter. Such logs or records are not filed with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, but must be kept available for review by a marine inspector for a period of 1 year after the date to which the records refer. Separate records of tests and inspections of fire fighting equipment must be maintained with the vessel's logs for the period of validity of the vessel's certificate of inspection.
[CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26004, May 23, 1996]
[ EXHIBIT 10.2  -  PROMISSORY NOTE ]

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


James W Young


$  722.69                                                         June 30, 2004

1. PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST. Perfect Healthcare Corp. (the "COMPANY"), a Nevada
Corporation, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of James W
Young or holder ("PAYEE") in lawful money of the United States at the principal
office of the Company, the principal amount of Seven Hundred Twenty Two Dollars
and sixty nine cents ($ 722.69), together with simple interest at 4% per annum
on the date of this Note. Accrued interest shall be payable in cash at the time
the Company pays the principal amount of this Note. This Note is due and payable
on demand, which may be made at any time after the earlier of Dec. 31, 2005.

2. NO PAYMENT IF UNLAWFUL. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no
payment hereunder shall be required at any time that such payment would be
unlawful under any applicable law.

3. ATTORNEYS' FEES. If the indebtedness represented by this Note or any part
thereof is collected in bankruptcy, receivership or other judicial proceedings
or if this Note is placed in the hands of attorneys for collection after
default, Company agrees to pay, in addition to the principal and interest
payable hereunder, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Payee.

4. PREPAYMENT; TRANSFER This Note may be pre-paid by the Company at any time.
This Note may be transferred only with the written consent of the Company.

5. ACCELERATION. This Note shall become immediately due and payable if (i) the
Company commences any proceeding in bankruptcy or for dissolution, liquidation,
winding-up, or other relief under state or federal bankruptcy laws; or (ii) such
proceedings are commenced against the Company, or a receiver or trustee is
appointed for the Company or a substantial part of its property, and such
proceeding or appointment is not dismissed or discharged within 60 days after
its commencement.

6. WAIVERS. Company hereby waives presentment, demand for performance, notice of
non-performance, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor. No delay on
the part of Payee in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of
such right or any other right. This Note is being delivered in and shall be
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, without regard
to the conflicts of laws provisions thereof.


                                       Perfect Healthcare Corp.
                                       Date  June 30, 2004


                                       /s/ Antoine Jarjour
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       By:  Antoine Jarjour, President / CEO
                                       Perfect Healthcare Corp.
                                       4017 Colby Ave
                                       Everett,  WA  98201
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 5, 2009

|Filer               | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|S & T BANCORP, INC. | * 3A3       | S&T Bancorp, Inc., Indiana, PA to acquire up to 24.99 percent of Allegheny Valley Bancorp, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA and thereby indirectly acquire Allegheny Valley Bank of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA pursuant to Section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act. | Newspaper:12/28/2009Federal Register:12/28/2009
|Newspaper:          | 12/28/2009 
|Federal Register:   | 12/28/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-30544

DAVID H. CLIBURN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

POLICE JURY ASSOCIATION OF LOUISIANA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

January 15, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant David Cliburn filed an ERISA claim against Appellee

Police Jury Association of Louisiana, Inc. The suit was dismissed

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, on the grounds that

Cliburn sought participation in a “governmental plan” not covered

by the statute. S ee 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(32); 1003(b). Cliburn does

not appeal from this dis missal. Following dismissal, the Police

Jury Association requested attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses-2- g:\opin\98-30544.opn under a provision of ERISA which states: “In any action under this

subchapter (other than an action described in paragraph (2)) by a

participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary, the court in its discretion

may allow a reasonable attorney’s fee and costs of action to either

party.” 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1). The district court awarded to the

Police Jury Association $15,600.00 in fees and $533.33 in expenses.

Cliburn appeals from that award and argues, inter alia, that

subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.

District courts are vested with federal question jurisdiction

in “all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or

treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The district

court’s dismi ssal of Cliburn’s claims for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction is inconsistent with an award of fees and costs under

a statute which requires “any action under this subchapter.” In

dismissing Cliburn’s suit, the district court determined that there

was no ERISA “action.” Furthermore, given that ERISA is

inapplicable to Cliburn’s claim s, it is inconsistent to conclude

that either Cliburn or the Police Jury Association is “a

participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary” eligible to invoke

§ 1132(g)(1). Given that the district court lacked jurisdiction to

hear Cl iburn’s claims under ERISA, it logically follows that the

cou r t lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Police Jury

Association’s request for f ees, costs, and expenses under ERISA.

See, e.g.

, Laborers Local 938 Joint Health & Welfare Trust Fund v.-3- g:\opin\98-30544.opn B.R. Starnes Co.

, 827 F.2d 1454, 1458 (11th Cir. 198 7). We

therefore VACATE the district court’s award of fees and costs and

DISMISS this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
§ 67.243 Requirements for instruments subordinating mortgages. An instrument subordinating a mortgage presented for filing and recording must: ( a ) Be signed by or on behalf of each mortgagee whose mortgage is being subordinated; and
( b ) Recite the following: ( 1 ) The name and address of each mortgagee whose mortgage is being subordinated; and
( 2 ) The name and address of each party holding an interest in the instrument subordinating the mortgage.
§ 54.30-1 Scope. ( a ) Certain pressure vessels may be mechanically stress relieved in accordance with the requirements in this subpart.
( b ) [Reserved]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1571

To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to protect

elected and appointed judges against discrimination based on age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 1995

Ms. MOLINARI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of

1967 to protect elected and appointed judges against

discrimination based on age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 The last sentence of section 11(f) of the Age Dis5 crimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C.

6 630(f)) is amended in the penultimate sentence by insert7 ing ‘‘or persons elected or appointed to a judicial office’’

8 before the period.
2

•HR 1571 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

2 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub3 section (b), this Act shall take effect 1 year after the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

5 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

6 made by section 1 shall not apply with respect to conduct

7 occurring before the effective date of this Act.

Æ