alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 54.10-20 Marking and stamping. ( a ) *Pressure vessels* (Replaces UG-116, except paragraph (k), and UG-118). Pressure vessels that are required by § 54.10-3 to be stamped with the Coast Guard Symbol must also be stamped with the following information: ( 1 ) Manufacturer's name and serial number.
( 2 ) Coast Guard number, see § 50.10-30 of this subchapter (only applicable to pressure vessels inspected as required by § 54.10-3(b)).
( 3 ) Coast Guard Symbol, which is affixed only by the marine inspector.
( 4 ) Maximum allowable working pressure __ kPa (__ psig) at __ °C (__ °F).
( 5 ) Class.
( 6 ) Minimum design metal temperature, if below −18 °C (0 °F).
( 7 ) Water capacity in liters (U.S. gallons), if a cargo-carrying pressure vessel.
( b ) *Multichambered pressure vessels* (Replaces UG-116(k)). In cases where more than one pressure vessel is involved in an integral construction, as with a heat exchanger, the manufacturer may elect to class the component pressure vessels differently. In such cases they must stamp the combined structures as required in paragraph (a) of this section with information for each pressure vessel. Where an item for stamping is identical for both vessels, as with name and address of manufacturer, it need not be duplicated. However, where differences exist, each value and the vessel to which it applies shall be clearly indicated.
( c ) *Stamping data* (Replaces UG-117). Except as noted in paragraph (d) of this section, the data must be stamped directly on the pressure vessel. The data must be legibly stamped and must not be obliterated during the service life of the pressure vessel. In the event that the portion of the pressure vessel upon which the data is stamped is to be insulated or otherwise covered, the data must be reproduced on a metal nameplate. This plate must be securely attached to the pressure vessel. The nameplate must be maintained in a legible condition such that it may be easily read. ( 1 ) Those parts of pressure vessels requiring Coast Guard shop inspection under this part which are furnished by other than the shop of the manufacturer responsible for the completed vessel must be stamped with the Coast Guard Symbol, the Marine Inspection Office identification letters (see § 50.10-30 of this subchapter) and the word “Part”, the manufacturer's name and serial number, and the design pressure.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Thin-walled vessels* (Modifies UG-119). In lieu of direct stamping on the pressure vessel, the information required by paragraph (a) of this section must be stamped on a nameplate permanently attached to the pressure vessel when the pressure vessel is constructed of— ( 1 ) Steel plate less than one-fourth inch thick; or
( 2 ) Nonferrous plate less than one-half inch thick.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9977, June 17, 1970; CGD 72-206R, 38 FR 17226, June 29, 1973; CGD 77-147, 47 FR 21810, May 20, 1982; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65170, Oct. 31, 2008]
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terri DuMoulin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date:  January 11, 2007By:/s/ Terri DuMoulinTerri DuMoulin
Principal Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interlink Electronics, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 033-93066, 333-39371 and333-53870) on Form S-8 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Interlink Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statementsof operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual  report on Form 10-K of Interlink Electronics, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California February 27, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1413 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1413

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
 Assistance Act to impose a limitation on State eligibility for major 
disaster and emergency assistance to ensure that States repay loans and 
                     advances made under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1995

   Mr. Peterson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
 Assistance Act to impose a limitation on State eligibility for major 
disaster and emergency assistance to ensure that States repay loans and 
                     advances made under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR MAJOR DISASTER AND EMERGENCY 
              ASSISTANCE.

    Title III of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5141-5164) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:

``SEC. 322. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSISTANCE.

    ``(a) In General.--A State shall not be eligible for assistance 
under this Act, other than essential assistance under section 402, if--
            ``(1) the State has received a loan or advance under 
        section 319 and the State is not in compliance with the 
        repayment terms of such loan or advance; and
            ``(2) the State has enacted, in the 2-year period preceding 
        the date of application for such assistance, laws that have 
        reduced or are likely to reduce annual tax revenues received by 
        the State by 1 percent or more.
    ``(b) Regulations.--The President shall issue regulations to carry 
out this section.
    ``(c) Applicability.--This section shall not preclude a State from 
receiving assistance under this Act for a major disaster or emergency 
occurring before the date of the enactment of this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-01-00193-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

OCTOBER 5, 2001

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A., A CHILD

 

FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

NO. 99-07-17,730; HON. DAVID L. GLEASON, PRESIDING

______________________________

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

 

Before QUINN, REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, appellant, has moved to

dismiss its appeal contending that it “has decided not to appeal this cause.” Without passing

on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal without prejudice. Having dismissed the appeal at

appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

 

Brian Quinn 

 Justice

Do not publish.
#### § 401.427 Charge on past due accounts.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76352, Sept. 17, 2024.

A charge of two percent (2%) per month shall be paid on the opening monthly balance on accounts remaining unpaid over thirty (30) days after the billing date.

[CGD 79-138, 45 FR 13078, Feb. 28, 1980. Redesignated at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, June 29, 1998]
#### The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York *v.*The National Broadway Bank.

—• Order reversed, without costs, and with leave to the respondents to accept the stipulation tendered and filed by the appellant within twenty days after service of the order to be-entered hereon, if they shall so elect.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, George L. Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ GEORGE L. BALL


George L. Ball


Chief Executive Officer







May 10, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 14, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                
|----------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|HIGHER ONE, INC   | 4c8* 3A1      | Higher One, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut - to become a bank holding company pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act in connection with the formation of Higher One Bank, New Haven, Connecticut. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00190-CV

Chaliese Rippey and all other occupants

v.

Chase Home Finance, LLC

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 1 of 

Tarrant County (2010-087757-1)

March 13, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Chaliese Rippey pay all costs of this appeal, and 

these costs be paid from the cash deposit in lieu of bond made with the clerk of 

the trial court for which let execution issue. The clerk of the trial court shall 

refund the remainder of this cash deposit in lieu of bond to Chaliese Rippey.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bob McCoy___________________

 Justice Bob McCoy
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors




     The non-employee directors of Endwave Corporation (the “Company”) will receive for fiscal year
2005 and thereafter, until changed by the Board of Directors, fees for service on the Company’s
Board of Directors as listed in the table below. The members of the Board of Directors are also
eligible for reimbursement for travel expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and
committee meetings in accordance with Company policy.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Board Membership Fees Payable to Non-Employee Directors	 	 	 	 
	Non-Employee Director Annual Retainer
	 	$	10,000	 
	Board Chair Annual Retainer
	 	$	10,000	 
	Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	 	$	10,000	 
	Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	 	$	5,000	 
	Nominating and Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	 	$	3,000	 
	Director Meeting Fee (in person)
	 	$	1,000	 
	Director Meeting Fee (telephonic)
	 	$	500	 
	Audit or Compensation Committee Meeting Fee (in person)
	 	$	1,000	 
	Audit or Compensation Committee Meeting Fee (telephonic)
	 	$	500	 






     Additionally, non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our 2000 Non-Employee
Directors’ Plan (the “Director Plan”). Pursuant to the Director Plan, all new non-employee
directors are automatically granted an option to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock upon their
election to our Board of Directors. All non-employee directors will also be granted an option to
purchase an additional 5,000 shares of Common Stock each year following the date of our annual
stockholders’ meeting. However, if any non-employee director has not served in that capacity for
the entire period since the preceding annual stockholders’ meeting, then the number of shares
subject to the annual grant will be reduced, pro rata, for each full quarter the person did not
serve during the previous period. All options issued under the Director Plan vest over four years
at the rate of 1/48th of the total grant per month after the issuance. All options under this plan
expire after ten years and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of
grant. Our directors are also eligible to participate in our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.



     On February 2, 2005, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Director Plan
providing that annual option grants (but not intial option grants) will vest over two years at the
rate of 1/24th of the total grant per month.



1
(YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION LOGO)

                                                       PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

                                                     INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE


TO:        Corporate Executive

FROM:

DATE:

RE:        Senior Management Incentive Plan (SMIP)


I am pleased to inform you that you have been approved by the Board of Directors
to participate in the Senior Management Incentive Plan (SMIP) portion of the
Company's Incentive Compensation Plan for fiscal year 2005. Please refer to the
Incentive Compensation Plan for more details on the plan description and
policies.

For the 2005 fiscal year, your incentive compensation will be based on the
following performance goals:

      1.    York International Earnings per Share (EPS)

      2.    York International Cash Flow

      3.    York International EBIT %


There are three levels of achievement for each goal. The achievement level will
be linearly pro-rated based on actual results.
<PAGE>
Goals and respective payout as a percentage of base salary is listed below ($ in
millions except EPS):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      WEIGHTING
                                THRESHOLD     TARGET    MAXIMUM        FACTOR
                                ---------     ------    -------        ------
<S>                             <C>           <C>       <C>           <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE
(EPS) for York International        $           $          $

Percent of Base
Salary to be paid                   %           %          %                %

CASH FLOW for York                  $           $          $
International

Percent of Base
Salary to be paid                   %           %          %                %

EBIT % for York
International                       %           %          %

Percent of Base
Salary to be paid                   %           %          %                %

Incentive Amount                    %           %          %
</TABLE>

Distribution of the amount earned under the SMIP will be made after the
Company's results for fiscal year 2005 have been audited. The actual timing,
amounts and individual distribution of those amounts are predicated upon actual
performance, and are ultimately approved by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. In the event of death, disability, retirement or
termination, other than for cause, payments will be prorated for the time of
employment. If you voluntarily leave the company or are terminated for cause
prior to the end of the year, any incentive payment will be forfeited.

Targets are confidential information and may not be communicated outside of the
Company, and should only be discussed internally on a need-to-know basis.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.136-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. ( a ) Fire doors submitted for type approval must be tested for non-combustibility under Annex 1, Part 5, and then tested for fire resistance under Annex 1, Part 3 of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.136-2). Adhesives used in the construction of fire doors need not be non-combustible, but they must be tested for low flame spread characteristics under Annex 1, Part 5 of the FTP Code and should be included in the approved door's follow-up program.
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx .*
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances, and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as a fire door.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire testing program, and must furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.
Director Cash Compensation Arrangement



 Exhibit 10.28 
  
 RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC. 
  
 OUTSIDE DIRECTOR CASH COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT 
  
 FOR SERVICES AS A NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR 
  
 Each non-employee director shall receive for his or her services as a Director of Rackable Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), annual cash compensation of
$20,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 The Chairperson of the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee, annual cash compensation of $10,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 The Chairperson of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as the
Chairperson of the Compensation Committee, annual cash compensation of $5,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 The Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, annual cash compensation of $5,000 per year, payable quarterly.
§ 502.241 Oral argument. ( a ) The Commission may hear oral argument either on its own motion or upon the written request of a party. If oral argument before the Commission is desired on exceptions to an initial or recommended decision, or on a motion, petition, or application, a request therefor shall be made in writing. Any party may make such a request irrespective of its filing exceptions under § 502.227. If a brief on exceptions is filed, the request for oral argument shall be incorporated in such brief. Requests for oral argument on any motion, petition, or application shall be made in the motion, petition, or application, or in the reply thereto. If the Commission determines to hear oral argument, a notice will be issued setting forth the order of presentation and the amount of time allotted to each party.
( b ) ( 1 ) Requests for oral argument will be granted or denied in the discretion of the Commission.
( 2 ) Parties requesting oral argument shall set forth the specific issues they propose to address at oral argument.
( c ) Those who appear before the Commission for oral argument shall confine their argument to points of controlling importance raised on exceptions or replies thereto. Where the facts of a case are adequately and accurately dealt with in the initial or recommended decision, parties should, as far as possible, address themselves in argument to the conclusions.
( d ) Effort should be made by parties taking the same position to agree in advance of the argument upon those persons who are to present their side of the case, and the names of such persons and the amount of time requested should be received by the Commission not later than ten (10) days before the date set for the argument. The fewer the number of persons making the argument the more effectively can the parties' interests be presented in the time allotted. [Rule 241.]
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 4144, Feb. 10, 1987]