alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James T. Sartain, certify that:

 
| (1)    |   | I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of  FirstCity Financial Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    |   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by  this report; and |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (3)    |   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.                         |

 

 
| Date: July 31, 2008 |   | /s/  JAMES T. SARTAIN        |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |   | James T. Sartain                       |
|                          |   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|                          |   | (Principal Executive Officer)          |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 16 (Thursday, January 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International--Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 14, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International--
Standards (``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided 
an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities 
originating between September 2006 and December 2006, designated as 
Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief 
description of each, is available at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
28, 2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 20, 2006 (71 FR 34644).
    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., 
General Counsel, at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 
telephone 610-832-9597, e-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14607b76667d717a54756760793a7b6673"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb9f848999828e85ab8a989f86c584998c">[email protected]</span></a>.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-317 Filed 1-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Lundy, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Lundy*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 279.]

(No. 98-1579

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided January 6, 1999.)

*Stephanie Tubbs Jones,*Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Patrick J. McCarthy,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit  32.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Benson, Chief Financial Officer of the
company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      January 29, 2010By
                  /s/ John BensonJohn
      Benson, Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Fund III
Financial Statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         586,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,547<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               891,476
<PP&E>                                      31,994,943<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,757,596)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,789,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          607,644
<BONDS>                                     18,829,979<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (7,648,107)<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,789,516
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,674,940<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,987,655<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,254,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   432,967<F8>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F8>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F8>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables grouped in "Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets" on the
Balance Sheet.
<F2>Includes apartment complexes of $31,475,359 and deferred expenses of $519,584.
<F3>Includes depreciation of $21,510,208 and amortization of deferred expenses of
$247,388.
<F4>Represents mortgage note payable.
<F5>Represents total deficit of the General Partners ($330,429) and the Limited
Partners ($7,317,678).
<F6>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F7>Includes operating expenses of $2,242,830, real estate taxes of $416,842 and
depreciation and amortization of $1,327,983.
<F8>Net Income allocated $4,330 to General Partners and $428,637 to Limited
Partners.  Net Income of $16.45 per unit on 25,000 units outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 23, 1995 (49), Para 49.14 Adjournment]
[Page 480]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.49.14  adjournment

  On motion of Mr. HAYWORTH, at 12 o'clock midnight, the House 
adjourned.
```
§ 72.20-50 Heating and cooling. ( a ) All manned spaces must be adequately heated and cooled in a manner suitable to the purpose of the space.
( b ) The heating and cooling system for accommodations must be capable of maintaining a temperature of 21 °C (70 °F) under normal operating conditions without curtailing ventilation.
( c ) Radiators and other heating apparatus must be so placed and shielded, where necessary, to avoid risk of fire, danger or discomfort to the occupants. Pipes leading to radiators or heating apparatus must be insulated where those pipes create a hazard to persons occupying the space.
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT A Fifth Third Bancorp Subsidiaries

EXHIBIT B National Information Center, A repository of financial date and

institution characteristics collected by the Federal Reserve System

re: Fifth Third Bancorp

Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 99-1, PageID.1006 Filed 09/20/18 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 15, 2010

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|TOWER BANCORP INC. | * 3A5         | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/09/2010
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 04/09/2010   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Columbus Bar Association *v.*James.

[Cite as *Columbus Bar Assn. v. James*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 379.]

(No. 98-1228

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided January 13, 1999.)

*381
      *Bruce A. Campbell, Kathaleen B. Schulte*and *Lance Tibbies,*for relator.

*Aaron N. James, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent’s personal behavior before several judges calls into question his fitness to practice law. He has a history of substance abuse, has pled guilty to a felony charge for possession of cocaine, and has failed to attend scheduled court hearings and obey instructions from trial courts. He has also neglected his clients’ interests and failed to seek their lawful objectives. Finally, he has failed to cooperate in disciplinary investigations of his misconduct.

We believe that these violations of the Disciplinary Rules and the Rules for the Government of the Bar warrant a more severe discipline than indefinite suspension. These are not isolated instances. Respondent’s pattern of conduct has ill-served his clients who have been prejudiced due to his failure to appear at hearings. To effect the goal of a speedy trial for everyone, trial judges must be able to rely on the representations of the attorneys who appear before them. Cf. *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 534, 537, 687 N.E.2d 678, 681. Respondent has failed in his duty as a member of the bar and is no longer entitled to be listed on the rolls of those permitted to practice law in Ohio.

Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would indefinitely suspend respondent.

Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William C. Brown, Executive V.P. and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William C. BrownWilliam C. BrownExecutive V.P. and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 5, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 5, 2007

|Filer                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|NORTHUMBERLAND BANCORP | CIC           | J. Donald Steele, Jr., and Joanne K. Steele, Lewisburg, PA to purchase up to 35% of Northumberland Bancorp, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/21/2007
|Newspaper:             | Not available
|Federal Register:      | 05/21/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1701

To cancel the Space Station project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 1995

Mr. ROEMER (for himself, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr.

SHAYS, Mr. KLECZKA, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. YATES, Mr. INGLIS of South

Carolina, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. UPTON, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mrs.

MALONEY, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. DANNER,

Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Science

A BILL

To cancel the Space Station project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CANCELLATION.

4 The Space Station project is hereby cancelled.

5 SEC. 2. REPORT ON TERMINATION COSTS.

6 Within 1 month after the date of enactment of this

7 Act, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and

8 Space Administration shall submit to the Congress a re9 port itemizing the funding required for carrying out the

10 cancellation of the Space Station project. Such report shall
2

•HR 1701 IH

1 include details of the purposes for which such funds are

2 needed, and any requests for funding in addition to

3 amounts authorized by this Act that may be required.

4 SEC. 3. REPORT ON TOTAL SPACE STATION COSTS.

5 Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act,

6 the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space

7 Administration shall submit to the Congress a report de8 tailing all Federal expenditures relating to the Space Sta9 tion from October 1, 1982, through the final cancellation

10 of the program.

11 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

12 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Ad13 ministrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin14 istration $500,000,000 for costs associated with carrying

15 out section 1 of this Act.

Æ
§ 64.77 Inspection and test. For the handling and stowage requirements in § 98.30-3 of this chapter, each MPT must pass the following inspections and tests conducted by the owner or the owner's representative: ( a ) Pressure relief and vacuum relief devices must be inspected one time or more during each 12 month period of service in accordance with § 64.79.
( b ) An MPT must be inspected during the 30 months before any month in which it is in service in accordance with § 64.81.
( c ) An MPT must pass a hydrostatic test in accordance with § 64.83 during the 60 months before any month in which it is in service.
( d ) After each welded repair, an MPT must pass a hydrostatic test in accordance with § 64.83.
[CGD 73-172, 39 FR 22950, June 25, 1974, as amended by CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37410, Sept. 11, 1990]
Exhibit  32.2



                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DGSE  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and
         2)       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated: August 10, 2006                    By  /s/ John Benson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Benson, Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ROBERT QUINTONE CRUMMIE, 

 

 Petitioner, Civil No. 2:15-CV-12723 

 HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS 

v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

CATHERINE BAUMAN, 

 

 Respondent, 

___________________________________/ 

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT 

OF COUNSEL AND THE MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING ORDER 

 Robert Quintone Crummie, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition was denied with prejudice. 

 Petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel and a related motion for a 

scheduling order, asking for time to allow appointed counsel to file additional pleadings. 

For the reasons that follow, the motions are DENIED. 

 There is no constitutional right to counsel in habeas proceedings. Cobas v. Burgess, 

306 F. 3d 441, 444 (6th Cir. 2002). Petitioner’s habeas claims lack merit; the motion for 

the appointment of counsel and the related motion for a scheduling order are denied. See 

Lemeshko v. Wrona, 325 F. Supp. 2d 778, 788 (E.D. Mich. 2004). 

IT IS ORDERED That: 

The motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF 20) and the motion for a 

scheduling order (ECF 21) are DENIED. 

 s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

 HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS 

Dated: 7/30/19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
§ 64.35 Bottom filling or discharge connection. If an MPT is designed with a filling or discharge connection in the bottom, the connection must be fitted with a bolted blank flange, threaded cap, or similar device to protect against leakage of the product, and a manually operated valve that is located— ( a ) Inside the tank and operated outside the tank; or
( b ) Outside the tank but as close to it as practicable.
**Exhibit
32.1**
  **Certification
Pursuant to**
 **Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Henry R. Carabelli, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge:
 
 1.
    The
      Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
      2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
      "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 2.
    The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 **In
Witness Whereof** , the
undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 16th day of May
2005.
 
 
 /s/Henry
      R.Carabelli
      Henry
      R. Carabelli
      President
      and Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal
      Executive Officer)