alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

Criminal No. 15-cr-20382 

v. 

HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

D-1 PAUL NICOLETTI, 

Defendant. 

 / 

STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS 

TO MAGISTRATE’S ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY MOTION (Doc.#38) 

The parties, through BARBARA L. McQUADE, U.S. Attorney, and Craig 

A. Weier, Assistant U.S. Attorney, for the United States, and John R. Minock for 

D-1 PAUL NICOLETTI, hereby stipulate to permit the government to respond to 

Defendant’s Objections to Magistrate’s Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for 

Discovery (Doc. #38) on or before January 13, 2017. The government’s response 

to this non-dispositive motion is now due by December 30, 2016 (Doc.#40: 

Stipulation and Order). The parties also stipulate that the Reply, if any, shall be 

filed on or before hall be filed on or before January 23, 2017. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BARBARA L. McQUADE 

United States Attorney 

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 41 Filed 12/29/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 479
s/CRAIG A. WEIER (P33261) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Phone: (313) 226-9678 

 E-Mail: craig.weier@usdoj.gov 

s/JOHN R. MINOCK 

Attorney for D-1 Paul Nicoletti 

Cramer, Minock & Sweeney PLC 

339 E Liberty St, Ste 200 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(734) 668-2200 

 jminock@cramerminock.com 

 December 22, 2016 

SO ORDERED. 

S/Victoria A. Roberts 

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: December 29, 2016 

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 41 Filed 12/29/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 480
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Wednesday May 23, 2007. 

The business of the Board requires that this meeting be held with less than one week's advance notice to the public, and no earlier announcement of the meeting was practicable.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1.  Staff Resource Planning Issues.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 18, 2007. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-2571 Filed 5-18-07; 3:02 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                             |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Date:  March      16, 2009 | /s/      Thomas B. Akin          |
|                                 | Thomas      B. Akin              |
|                                 | Principal      Executive Officer |
|                                 |                             |
| Date:  March      16, 2009 | /s/      Stephen J. Benedetti    |
|                                 | Stephen      J. Benedetti        |
|                                 | Principal      Financial Officer |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON LEE BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 328 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and Motion to Remand are DENIED.
Cite as 2017 Ark. 131



## S UPREME COURT OF ARKANS AS

IN RE ARKANSAS B OARD OF LAW EXAMINERS Opinion Delivered April 13, 2017

PER CU R I AM
Ernest Sanders of Lit t le Rock is appoint ed to t he B oard of Law E xam iners for a sixye a r t e r m c o n c luding on April 13, 2023. Mr. Sanders will be an at -large m em ber and replaces Melissa McJunkins “Missy” Duke of Lit t l e Rock whose t erm has concluded. The court ext e nds it s sincere appreciat i on t o Mr. Sanders for accept ing appoint m ent
t o t his im port ant board. The court also expresses it s grat i t ude t o Ms. Duke f or her dedicat ed service t o t he board.
#### EASTERN TIRE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. HARRY GOUKLER, RESPONDENT.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided July 3, 1929.

Before Justices Tkenchaed, Kalisci-i and Lloyd.

Eor the appellant, *Irving J. Rosenberg.*

Eor the respondent, *Robert Peacoch.*

Pee Cueiam.

This was an action to recover the amount of a cheek, given by defendant, for $440. The case was heard by the judge of the District Court, without a jury.

*627The plaintiff proved that it took the cheek on the day it bore date, partly in payment of tires, and party for cash; that on presentation the check was not paid. The defendant’s contention was illegality in the contract; this illegality consisting of the fact that it was given for the purchase of liquors. The trial judge, deeming this a good defense, rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.

In thus ruling we think there was error. "Under the proofs plaintiff was a holder in due course *(Rice*v. Barrington, 75 *N. J. L.*806), and as such was entitled to recover the amount of the check. Assuming that the evidence offered'by the defendant established that a sale of intoxicating liquors was the consideration for which the check was given, this was not a defense against a *tona fide*holder, whatever the effect of the illegal consideration might bo as between the immediate parties. *Pamph. L.*1902, *p.*593, § 57; 8 *C. J.*767, 768.

The judgment is reversed.
Executive Officer Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
 NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC. 
  
 EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS PLAN 
  
 As part of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors annual incentive cash bonus
awards for executive officers of the Company. 
  
 The amount of
the bonus awards is generally determined for each executive officer based on the following business objectives, as applied to that officer’s business unit, and such officer’s contribution to achieving those objectives: 
  

	 	•	 	earnings per share growth; 

  

	 	•	 	operating growth, including the volume of loans originated and profit from fee income business units; 

  

	 	•	 	financial strength of the organization; and 

  

	 	•	 	development and implementation of strategic plan. 

  
 The specific objectives for each executive officer may be included in his or her employment agreement or agreed upon with the Compensation Committee on an
annual basis. Bonuses awarded are paid in cash in the year after they are earned unless deferred by the officer pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6151

COREY DESEAN HOOD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-944-5-BO)

Submitted: April 20, 2001 Decided: June 12, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey DeSean Hood, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Corey DeSean Hood appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error in its conclusion that Hood has failed to satisfy his burden

of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) is an

inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his

detention. See § 2255 ¶ 5; Jeffers v. Chandler, 234 F.3d 277, 280

(5th Cir. 2000). However, we modify the district court’s order to

reflect a dismissal without prejudice, in order to allow Hood to

refile his petition at such time as he is able to make such a

demonstration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending September 8, 2007

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|HERITAGE STATE BANK | * Branch       | Heritage State Bank, Lawrenceville, Illinois, to establish a branch facility to be located at Route 1 and Highway 68, Haubstadt, Indiana. | Newspaper:09/13/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 09/13/2007    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 24, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for  Quarter of 2009 ()

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Christopher Delaney, Respondent, *v.*The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburgh Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barker, J.
§ 46.01-15 Application of regulations. ( a ) The regulations in this part establish subdivision load lines required on passenger vessels engaged in foreign voyages, as well as on passenger vessels of 150 gross tons or over engaged in coastwise or Great Lakes voyages.
( b ) When engaged in voyages subject to this part, no passenger vessel required to be marked with subdivision load lines shall depart from or arrive at any port or place under the jurisdiction of the United States, nor shall such United States vessel operate on the high seas nor the Great Lakes, unless such vessel has been marked with subdivision load lines in accordance with the regulations in this part, has on board a valid certificate certifying to the correctness of the location of such subdivision load line marks, and is otherwise in compliance with the applicable requirements of law and regulations in this part.
( c ) No passenger vessel of the United States of 150 gross tons or over and subject to 46 U.S.C. 5101-5116, shall engage in coastwise voyages or voyages on the Great Lakes unless such vessel has been marked with subdivision load lines in accordance with the regulations in this part and has on board a valid certificate certifying to the correctness of the location of such subdivision load line marks.
( d ) No foreign passenger vessel belonging to a country that has ratified or acceded to the applicable International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea shall arrive or depart from any port or place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and no foreign passenger vessel subject to 46 U.S.C. 5101-5116, shall arrive or depart from any port or place under the jurisdiction of the United States, including ports on the Great Lakes, unless that vessel has been marked with subdivision load lines in accordance with the regulations in this part and has on board a valid certificate certifying to the correctness of the location of such subdivision load line marks.
( e ) Subdivision load lines shall be marked on both sides of passenger vessels where determined and in a manner described in subpart 46.15 as applicable to the vessel's service. The subdivision load line certificates shall be in accordance with §§ 46.10-30 and 46.10-35.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16769, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 80-120, 47 FR 5723, Feb. 8, 1982; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51044, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52190, Sept. 30, 1998]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending November 10, 2007

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                              
|---------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|METRO BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A1          | Metro Bancshares, Inc., Douglasville, Georgia, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Metro Bank, both of Douglasville, Georgia ( in organization).                                                             | Newspaper:11/29/2007Federal Register:12/03/2007    
|Newspaper:             | 11/29/2007    
|Federal Register:      | 12/03/2007    
|SUNTRUST BANK          | * Branch       | SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia, to establish a branch located at 3521 N. Elm Street, Greensboro, North Carolina, to be known as the Lake Jeanette Office.                                                                                                      | Newspaper:11/20/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | 11/20/2007    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable
|SUNTRUST BANK          | * Branch       | SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia, to establish branches in the following locations: 11104 Bloomingdale Avenue, Riverview, Florida, to be known as the Winthrop Office; and 500 N. Miramar Avenue, Indiatlantic, Florida, to be known as the Indiatlantic Office. | Newspaper:11/22/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | 11/22/2007    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41143

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

COSME REJINALDO GONZALEZ, also known as Luis, also known asPancho,

also known as Francisco, also known as El Gorroso, also known as Mike Jones,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-42-9

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Cosme Rejinaldo Gonzalez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Gonzalez has not filed a response, but we have received his pro se

request for a stay; a stay is not warranted in this case. We have reviewed

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 31, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41143 Document: 00512326729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2013
No. 12-41143

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41143 Document: 00512326729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/31/2013
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 8, 2006                                   /s/ Emile A. Battat
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Emile A. Battat
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


     The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and not for any other purpose.

                                       21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 15-20382 

Plaintiff, 

v Hon. Victoria A. Roberts 

PAUL NICOLETTI, 

Defendant. 

_____________________________ 

STIPULATION

It is hereby agreed between the parties that the time for Defendant to file a 

response to the government motion to preclude evidence and arguments, R 48, be 

extended three days, to March 10, 2017 at the request of defense counsel. 

s/AUSA Craig Weier s/John Minock 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the above stipulation, 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Defendant to file a response to the 

government motion to preclude evidence and arguments, R 48, is extended three 

days, to March 10, 2017. 

 S/Victoria A. Roberts 

Hon. Victoria J. Roberts 

United States District Judge 

Dated: March 8, 2017 

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 54 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 559