alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending October 3, 2009

|Filer                            | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC         | Notice by Mr. Harmon A. Brown, Chicago, Illinois, to become independent trustee of the LCK 1993 Trust, LCK Dynasty Trust, LCK Legacy Trust, the Katz Millennium Trust, and LCK Trust #2, and therefore acquire control of First Community Bancshares, Inc., Killeen, Texas, and indirectly acquire FCBI Delaware Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, First National Bank Texas, Killeen, Texas, and Fort Hood National Bank, Fort Hood, Texas. | Newspaper:10/15/2009Federal Register:10/13/2009
|Newspaper:                       | 10/15/2009 
|Federal Register:                | 10/13/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location        | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMUNITY BK, GRANBURY, TEXAS | 268257 | 06/15/2009 | 09/28/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries as of March 9, 2009
 Subsidiary Name
    
    Place of Incorporation
    
    
    Percent Ownership1075 First Global Associates, LLC
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    
    100%7601 Trade Port Drive, LLC
    
    Kentucky
    
    
    100%935 HQ Associates, LLC
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    
    100%935 KOP Associates, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100%ASFD, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100%E-Dialog UK Limited
    
    England and Wales
    
    
    100%E-Dialog, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100%GSI Commerce Call Center, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    
    100%GSI Commerce Solutions International, S.L.
    
    Spain
    
    
    100%GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc.
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    
    100%GSI Commerce South, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100%GSI Equipment, Inc.
    
    New York
    
    
    100%GSI Interactive, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100%GSI Legacy Holdings, Inc.
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    
    100%GSI Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    Luxembourg
    
    
    100%KOP Promotions LLC
    
    Virginia
    
    
    100%Online Direct, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100%Promotions Distributor Services Corporation
    
    California
    
    
    100%Zendor/GSI Commerce Limited
    
    England and Wales
    
    
    100%
 1
§ 221.11 Required approvals. ( a ) Except as provided in section 12119 of title 46, United States Code, a Person may not, without the approval of the Maritime Administrator: ( 1 ) Sell, lease, charter, deliver, or in any manner Transfer to a Noncitizen, or agree (unless such agreement by its terms requires approval of the Maritime Administrator in order to effect such transfer), to sell, lease, charter, deliver, or in any manner Transfer to a Noncitizen, any interest in or control of a Documented Vessel owned by a Citizen of the United States or a vessel the last documentation of which was under the laws of the United States except as provided in this part; or
( 2 ) Place any Documented Vessel, or any vessel the last documentation of which was under the laws of the United States, under foreign registry or operate that vessel under the authority of a foreign country, except as provided in this part.
( b ) ( 1 ) The approvals required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not required for the following Documented Vessel types if the vessel has been operated exclusively and with *bona fides* for one or more of the following uses, under a Certificate of Documentation with an appropriate endorsement and no other, since initial documentation or renewal of its documentation following construction, conversion, or transfer from foreign registry, or, if it has not yet so operated, if the vessel has been designed and built and will be operated for one or more of the following uses: ( i ) A Fishing vessel;
( ii ) A Fish processing vessel;
( iii ) A Fish tender vessel; and
( iv ) A Pleasure vessel.
( 2 ) A vessel of a type specified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section will not be ineligible for the approval granted by this paragraph by reason of also holding or having held a Certificate of Documentation with a coastwise or registry endorsement, so long as any trading under that authority has been only incidental to the vessel's principal employment in the fisheries and directly related thereto.
[57 FR 23478, June 3, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 6880, Feb. 11, 1998; 78 FR 35771, June 14, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                     152,970,244             153,728,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,016,514              12,166,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,377,000               1,208,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           258,133,791             200,796,790
<PP&E>                                      19,933,487               6,596,831
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,462,257               2,636,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             874,642,068             317,235,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       90,425,567              53,734,492
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       967,071                 779,832
<OTHER-SE>                                 724,715,549             236,383,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               874,642,068             317,235,336
<SALES>                                    135,520,826              56,060,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           135,520,826              56,060,305
<CGS>                                       28,726,949              12,513,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              202,490,738              87,551,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,360,425                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (52,043,564)            (52,043,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (52,043,564)            (52,043,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (52,043,564)            (52,043,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.60)                  (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)                  (0.60)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2983

_____________________________
R OBERT E ARL H AYES ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Amended Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

May 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
The amended petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Robert Earl Hayes, pro se
, Petition er

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
§ 53.05-1 Safety valve requirements for steam boilers (modifies HG-400 and HG-401). ( a ) The pressure relief valve requirements and the safety valve requirements for steam boilers must be as indicated in HG-400 and HG-401 of Section IV of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 53.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) Each steam boiler must have at least one safety valve.
[CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9435, Mar. 8, 1985, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65163, Oct. 31, 2008]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 52 0 . J ENNI FER SHURLEY v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 1

, J e n n i fer Sh u rl ey was s en ten ced as a fi rs t o ffen d er t o fi ve y ears o n

p ro b at i o n fo r b u rg l ary

. In 2 0 1 5

, t h e t ri al co u rt rev o k ed h er pro b at i o n fo r t h e

co m m i s s io n o f a n e w fel o ny , ad ju d i cat ed her g u i l t y o n t h e 2 0 1 1 ch arg es , an d res en t en ced h er. Sh u rl ey fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal

. W e, h o w ev er, l ack ju ri s di ct io n

. Becau s e t h e un d erl y in g su b ject m at t er o f Sh u rl ey ’ s ap p eal i s t h e rev ocat i o n o f

h er fi rs t o ffen d er pro bat i o n , s h e was req ui red t o fi l e an ap p li cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal i n o rd er t o o b t ai n rev i ew i n t h is Co u rt . See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (5 ); Jo n es v.

S t a t e , 3 22 G a. Ap p

. 2 6 9 n. 2 (7 4 5 SE2 d 1 ) (2 0 1 3 ); Za m or a v. S t at e , 2 2 6 Ga. Ap p

. 1 0 5
(4 8 5 SE2 d 2 14 ) (1 9 9 7 ). Sh u rl ey ’ s f a i l u r e t o fi l e an ap p l icat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

a p p eal d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri sd i ct i o n t o co n si d er t h i s ap peal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED. See W

h it e v. S t a t e , 2 3 3 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 3 (5 05 SE2 d 2 2 8 ) (1 9 9 8 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/30/2015 April 30, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; EARDA.                     

*Date:*                         July 10, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898,                         *wallsc@mail.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864. Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS). 

Dated: June 8, 2007. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-2962 Filed 6-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 54.01-30 Loadings (modifies UG-22). ( a ) The loadings for pressure vessels must be as required by UG-22 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) In evaluating loadings for certain pressure vessel applications, the Commandant may require consideration of the following loads in addition to those listed in UG-22 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC: ( 1 ) Loading imposed by vessel's attitude in roll, list, pitch and trim.
( 2 ) Dynamic forces due to ship motions.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65167, Oct. 31, 2008]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


EXHIBIT 11.1 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The factors used in the earnings per share
computation follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              2002            2001
                                                              ----            ----
<S>                                                     <C>              <C>
Basic
Net income (loss)                                       $          209   $        180
                                                        ==============   ============

Weighted average common shares
Outstanding                                                  1,574,749      1,530,264

Basic earnings per common share                         $         0.13   $       0.12
                                                        ==============   ============

Diluted
Net income (loss)                                       $          209   $        180
                                                        ==============   ============

Weighted average common shares

Outstanding for basic earnings per
common share                                                 1,574,749      1,530,264
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of
 stock options and RRP shares                                   24,612         23,181
                                                        --------------   ------------

Average shares and dilutive potential
 common shares                                               1,599,361      1,553,445
                                                        ==============   ============

Diluted earnings per common share                       $          .13   $       0.11
                                                        ==============   ============

</TABLE>


Stock options for 8,000 shares of common stock were not considered in computing
diluted earnings per common share for 2001 because they were anti dilutive.
§ 61.35-1 General. ( a ) All automatic auxiliary boilers except fired thermal fluid heaters must be tested and inspected in accordance with this subpart and subpart 61.05.
( b ) Fired thermal fluid heaters must be tested and inspected in accordance with subpart 61.30.
( c ) All controls, safety devices, and other control system equipment must be tested and inspected to verify their proper design, construction, installation, and operation.
( d ) All tests must be performed after installation of the automatic auxiliary boiler and its control system(s) aboard the vessel.
( e ) As far as practicable, test techniques must not simulate monitored system conditions by misadjustment, artificial signals, improper wiring, tampering, or revision of the system tested. The use of a synthesized signal or condition applied to a sensor is acceptable if the required test equipment is maintained in good working order and is periodically calibrated. Proper operation and proper calibration of test equipment must be demonstrated to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
[CGD 88-057, 55 FR 24237, June 15, 1990, as amended by USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50189, June 12, 2024]
#### § 67.14 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(3) which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| Part 67 | 1625-0027 |
| Part 68 | 1625-0027 |

[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58346, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2016-0531, 82 FR 43863, Sept. 20, 2017]
#### Columbus Bar Association *v.*Taylor.

[Cite as *Columbus Bar Assn. v. Taylor*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 149.]

(No. 98-1242

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*150
      *William A. Good*and *Bruce A. Campbell,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We agree that respondent neglected his client’s probate case. Respondent agreed to represent the estate of Carryl Titus, a woman from whom he had rented lodging for many years and to whom he owed approximately one thousand dollars. Once retained, respondent failed to include this debt in the inventory of estate assets, a mistake he attributed to lack of expertise. Respondent also failed to timely file fiduciary accountings, for which the estate fiduciary was twice cited for contempt by the probate court. The estate suffered no fines or penalties for this neglect, but respondent was jailed for his delay. Respondent further failed to negotiate four checks written to pay credit card debts and taxes. He was eventually dismissed and replaced by another attorney.

We have recognized that “[njeglect of an entrusted matter warrants the sanction of suspension.” *Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 302, 303, 677 N.E.2d 1181, 1182. Thus, we also agree with the board’s decision to impose a one-year suspension for respondent’s neglect; however, we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition that respondent commits no other disciplinary infractions. We consider as mitigating the facts that respondent has hardly practiced at all since law school, accepting only a handful of friends’ domestic and criminal cases when he could not find other employment, and that he simply panicked when he found he did not know how to handle the Titus estate. His misconduct thus resulted purely from inexperience and a corresponding lack of confidence in his professional competence — not self-interest. Under these circumstances, we find an inevitable actual suspension unnecessary.

Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that respondent commits no other professional misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, E.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 35.07-1 Application—TB/ALL. ( a ) Except as specifically noted, the provisions of this subpart shall apply to all tank vessels.
|                                 | NATIONAL PENN BANCSHARES, INC.                              |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                        |
|                                 | By: /s/ Scott V. Fainor                                     |
|                                 | Name:   Scott V. Fainor                      |
|                                 | Title:      President and CEO |
|                                 |                                                        |
|                                 |                                                        |
|                                 | NATIONAL PENN BANK                                          |
|                                 |                                                        |
|                                 | By: /s/ Scott V. Fainor                                     |
|                                 | Name:  Scott V. Fainor                            |
|                                 | Title:     President and CEO       |
|                                 |                                                        |
| Witness:  /s/ Nancy Alaimo | /s/ H. Anderson Ellsworth                                   |
|                                 | H. Anderson Ellsworth                                       |

----