alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

HASKELL G. GREER, et al., 

 

 Case No. 15-12444 

 Plaintiffs, HON. JUDITH E. LEVY 

 v Mag. Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford 

 

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

SEIKALY, STEWART & BENNETT, P.C.

Jeffrey T. Stewart (P24138) 

30445 Northwestern Highway, Suite 250 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

(248) 785-0102 

jts@sslawpc.com 

 

ELIZABETH A. DOWNEY, P.C. 

Elizabeth A. Downey (P37036) 

30445 Northwestern Highway, Suite 250 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

(248) 539-7407 

attylizdowney@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 JAMES W. MCGINNIS, P.C. 

 James W. McGinnis (P29323) 

 985 E. Jefferson Ave., Ste. 100 

 Detroit, MI 48207 

 (313) 446-9582 

 

 Counsel for Defendants 

 

 

 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE DISTRIBUTION OF 

SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to: 

Case 5:15-cv-12444-JEL-EAS ECF No. 98, PageID.1974 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 3
1. approve the allocation of settlement proceeds as to the minor 

Plaintiff, Kailaa Greer, and, 

2. upon such approval, to dismiss the case with prejudice and without 

costs for the reason that an amicable settlement has been reached 

on all claims. 

A hearing was held on February 13, 2019, at which appeared counsel for the 

parties and Haskell Greer, the Court-appointed Conservator for the minor, Kailaa 

Greer. The Court was fully advised of the particulars of the settlement and the 

proposed distribution to the plaintiffs. The Court notes that the allocation to the 

minor child is the highest of all the individual allocations and more than twice as 

high as the average allocation among the adults. The Court finds the allocation to 

the minor to be fair and reasonable in the circumstances and approves that 

allocation. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 

1. the distribution of proceeds to the plaintiffs as presented to the Court 

is approved; 

2. the distribution to the minor shall be made into a restricted account 

according to the conservatorship orders already entered in the Oakland County 

Probate Court; 

Case 5:15-cv-12444-JEL-EAS ECF No. 98, PageID.1975 Filed 02/13/19 Page 2 of 3
3. the case is HEREBY DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as 

to all claims and all parties pursuant to the settlement agreement and release 

between the parties. 

Dated: February 13, 2019 s/Judith E. Levy 

 JUDITH E. LEVY 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:15-cv-12444-JEL-EAS ECF No. 98, PageID.1976 Filed 02/13/19 Page 3 of 3
Order entered November 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01002-CV

VALPAK DIRECT MARKETING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant

V.

COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-03570-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 19, 2018 unopposed motion to supplement its

brief. Appellant explains in its motion that, at a status hearing on October 15, 2018, the trial 

court made a ruling that moots the arguments made in sections IV, V, VI, and VII of its original 

brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent that we ORDER appellant to file an amended brief 

by November 30, 2018.

Also before the Court is appellee’s November 16, 2018 unopposed second motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief. In light of the fact that appellant will file an amended brief, we 

GRANT the motion and extend the time to December 20, 2018. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, W. Glen Ibbott, certify that:

 

1.                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of QLT Inc.; and

 

2.                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 30, 2015

 
| /s/   W. Glen Ibbott                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W.   Glen Ibbott                               |   |
| Interim   Chief Financial Officer              |   |
| (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
** Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, J. Bryan Baker, certify that:

 
| (1)    |   | I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of  FirstCity Financial Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    |   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by  this report; and |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (3)    |   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.                         |

 

 
| Date: July 31, 2008 |   | /s/  J. BRYAN BAKER                      |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | J. Bryan Baker                                     |
|                     |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|                     |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                      |

 

----
§ 502.221 Appeal from ruling of presiding officer other than orders of dismissal in whole or in part. ( a ) Rulings of the presiding officer may not be appealed prior to or during the course of the hearing, or subsequent thereto, if the proceeding is still before him or her, except where the presiding officer finds it necessary to allow an appeal to the Commission to prevent substantial delay, expense, or detriment to the public interest, or undue prejudice to a party.
( b ) Any party seeking to appeal must file a motion for leave to appeal no later than fifteen (15) days after written service or oral notice of the ruling in question, unless the presiding officer, for good cause shown, enlarges or shortens the time. Any such motion must contain the grounds for leave to appeal and the appeal itself.
( c ) Replies to the motion for leave to appeal and the appeal may be filed within fifteen (15) days after date of service thereof, unless the presiding officer, for good cause shown, enlarges or shortens the time. If the motion is granted, the presiding officer must certify the appeal to the Commission.
( d ) Unless otherwise provided, the certification of the appeal will not operate as a stay of the proceeding before the presiding officer.
( e ) The provisions of § 502.10 do not apply to this section. [Rule 221.]
[81 FR 93839, Dec. 22, 2016]
#### § 502.281 Investigational policy.

The Commission has extensive regulatory duties under the various acts it is charged with administering. The conduct of investigations is essential to the proper exercise of the Commission's regulatory duties. It is the purpose of this subpart to establish procedures for the conduct of such investigations which will insure protection of the public interest in the proper and effective administration of the law. The Commission encourages voluntary cooperation in its investigations where such can be effected without delay or without prejudice to the public interest. The Commission may, in any matter under investigation, invoke any or all of the compulsory processes authorized by law. [Rule 281.]
p.1 

OAR Box 1772 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

28) IV-E-3 

Docket Number: 

A-86-03 

Printed 12/2/2008 9:45:11 AM Sheet 28 of 117 
P.2 

J*** 0 •".« , 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND FIADIATION 

! ! 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting With Small Business Administration 

FROM: William W. Damico, Chemical Engineer 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

£-••=> 

TO: 

THRU: 

Docket A-86-03 

John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager/ 

Standards Development and Support Branch*7 

On October 23, 1989, representatives of the Environmental 

Protection Agency met with representatives of the Small Business 

Administration (SBA) to discuss the impacts of the proposed 

diesel fuel regulations on small entities, particularly small 

petroleum marketers. The EPA was represented by Willard Smith 

of OPPE and William Damico, Chemical Engineer and John Anderson, 

Senior Project Manager of OMS/ECTD/SDSB. Doris Freedman, Kevin 

Bromberg, and Frank Swain, all of the Office of Advocacy, 

represented SBA. In addition, Robert Burt of Meridian Research, 

Inc. (a contractor) attended the meeting at the reguest of SBA. 

Mr. Anderson first gave a summary of the proposed rule and 

then reviewed the options which had been suggested by SBA for 

reducing small marketer impacts. Once our difficulties with 

these options had been explained, SBA appeared to agree that 

none of them represented a viable solution to the small 

marketers' difficulties. Discussions then turned to EPA's plans 

to study the impacts of the regulations on small marketers. We 

laid out our plans for a contractor study of the impacts of the 

proposed regulations. SBA expressed the hope that the study and 

the rulemaking would be done with informed judgment and 

sensitivity to small marketer concerns. We agreed to solicit 

SBA comments on our statement of work before undertaking the 

study. 

1324w 

jn j_ j _ E. r_ 

H i JAN I I 1990 IIH 

EPA AIR DOCKET
*Monday, November 16, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

98-1274.

#### Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Certified State Law Question, No. C2980227. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. On November 12, 1998, petitioner filed a reply brief that was due November 2,1998, under S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that petitioner’s reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.
§ 46.10-5 Load line requirements for subdivision. ( a ) The load line requirements of parts 42, 44, 45 of this subchapter as applicable to the passenger vessel and her service, shall be complied with before a passenger vessel will be marked with and certificated as to subdivision load lines.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16769, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10077, July 12, 1968]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marco A. Martinez, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

May 9,
2011

/s/ MARCO A. MARTINEZ Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---
# C_2012109EN.01001203.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/12

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 February 2012 — Dagher v Council

(Case T-218/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Application for interim measures - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 109/28

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Habib Roland Dagher (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: J.-Y. Dupeux and F. Dressen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Firstly, application for an order that the Council and the Italian Republic issue a visa to the applicant; secondly, application for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2005 L 28, p. 32) and Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2010 L 28, p. 60); and, thirdly, a claim for damages in compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the application for interim measures.

| 2. | The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

---
#### Adaline Wright, Respondent, *v.*Isabella S. Conger, *Appellant,*Impleaded, *etc.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Koertner, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

November 8,
2010

/s/ WILLIAM A. KOERTNER Chief Executive Officer and President


---
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 

Sectioll 6(a)(3)(E) ofE 0. 12866 requires agencies to identify for the public. ill 

a complete, clear, and simple manner, those changes in a regulatory action 

made at the suggestion or recommendation of the Office of information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Managemellt and Budget. Place a copy of 

this form in the docket and ill the project folder. 

Title of Rulemaking: Re·Registration and Renewal of Aircraft Registration 

Regulatory Identification Number: 2120·A189 

OIRA did not review the rulemaking document. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, but did not 

suggest or recommend any changes. 

X OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, and we have 

documented the changes we made at OlRA's suggestion or 

recommendation in an attachment to this sheet. 

nalys, 
Changes made in Regulatory Action at OMB's suggestion : 

I. An executive summary and summary costs benefit table were added to the preamble of 

the mlemaking document. 

2. Minor edits for clarification were made including adding a web address for the Registry. 

3. Changed final rule to renect that OMB has not approved the infonnation collection. 

OMS has only assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0729. 

2
§ 67.237 Requirements for assignments of mortgages. An assignment of mortgage presented for filing and recording must: ( a ) Be signed by or on behalf of each assignor; and
( b ) Recite the following: ( 1 ) The name and address of each assignor and the interest in the mortgage held by the assignor(s); and
( 2 ) The name and address of each assignee and the interest in the mortgage granted to the assignee(s).
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000131 30-MAY-2017 07:56 AM
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.08.015.005 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __1

_

Project Name: Airport Deicing

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: July 27, 2011 Time:

Company Name: Albany International Airport Contact Name: Mark Sobe r, Chief Process Operator

Phone No.: 518-242-2387

Name: Call conducted by Mark Briggs, ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT : Additional Informatio n on ALB AFB System Opera tion to Control Influent COD Load to Treatment

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Mark Briggs of ERG spoke with Mark Sober at Alba ny International Airport on July 27, 2011. Mark Sober confirmed that they adjust flow into the Anaerobic Fl uidized Bed (AFB) system on a daily basis to adjust COD loadings. Albany conducts a COD analysis on the in fluent to treatment da ily and based on the COD concentration adjust flow to stay within the desi gn loading. Sometimes Albany also does a COD analysis during the 2 nd shift to make finer adjustments if needed. According to Mark Sober, the design COD loading range for the AFB system is large (approximately 6 kg/m3 up to 25 kg/m3) so it is not difficult for them to stay within the design loading range . He said there have been times when the influent COD concentration was very low so they had to pump lots of wa ter into the system to maintain the minimum loading, however this was planned for in the design of the system so there is plen ty of hydraulic capacity and it has not been an issue.

With regard to an increase in effluent COD concentrati on when the loading increases, Mark Sober indicated that is not the case and someone must be looking at the Albany data incorrectly. He said if the system is designed correctly, like Albany, then increases in influent loading will not cause effluent concen trations to in crease. If Albany needs to do a large increase in loading for some reason, they switch a valve and put the system into series mode rather than parallel a nd the second reactor acts as a polishing system and effluent concentrations remain constant. He felt that AFBs at airports such as Akron that are treating deicing stormwater may be experiencing performance problems possibly due to design issues, not the technology.

Mark Sober said that the Al bany system feeds from thr ee equalization (EQ) tanks. They measure COD in each EQ tank and then can plan which tank they will put a new storm in to provide more equalization. The system operators also decide which tanks to pump from to maintain their system loading. He said the tanks do a good job at concentration equalization and they have not had to do a “pump down” for an anticipated storm.
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 AMENDMENT No. 4 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
PURCHASE AGREEMENT DCT-021/03
    WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Additional Aircraft delivery schedule:
   Additional
    
    Contractual DeliveryAircraft #
    
    Month
    
    Block #26**
    
    **27
    
    **28
    
    **
    
    **29
    
    **30
    
    **31**
    
    **32
    
    **33
    
    **
    
    **34
    
    **35
    
    **
 
 **
    
    Confidential Treatment Requested  Page 1 of 4




---



##### 



Additional
    
    Contractual DeliveryAircraft #
    
    Month
    
    Block #36**
    
    **37
    
    **38
    
    **
    
    **39
    
    **40
    
    **41**
    
    **42
    
    **43
    
    **
    
    **44
    
    **45
    
    **46**
    
    **47
    
    **48
    
    **
    
    **49
    
    **50
    
    **51**
    
    **52
    
    **53
    
    **
    
    **53
    
    **55
    
    **56**
    
    **
    
    **57
    
    **
   2. Option Aircraft delivery schedule:
   Option Aircraft
 OptionAircraft #
    
    Contractual Delivery Month1
    
    **2
    
    **3
    
    **4
    
    **5
    
    **6
    
    **
 
 **
    
    Confidential Treatment Requested  Page 2 of 4




---



##### 



OptionAircraft #
    
    Contractual Delivery Month7
    
    **8
    
    **9
    
    **10
    
    **11
    
    **12
    
    **13
    
    **14
    
    **15
    
    **16
    
    **17
    
    **18
    
    **19
    
    **20
    
    **
 3. Coat Closet in first class cabin
  4. Aircraft Basic Price
   EMBRAER 190 Initial Aircraft**
    
    US$ **EMBRAER 190 Initial Aircraft**
    
    US$ **EMBRAER 190 Additional Aircraft
    
    US$**
  5. Miscellaneous
  
 **
    
    Confidential Treatment Requested  Page 3 of 4




---



##### 



EMBRAER  Empresa
Brasileira de 
Aeronáutica S.A.
    
    
    
    US Airways Group, Inc.By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Mauro Kern Junior

Mauro Kern Junior
    
    
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Thomas T. Weir

Thomas T. WeirTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Vice President and TreasurerBy:
    
    /s/ Jose Luis D. Molina
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    March 14, 2008Name:
    
    Jose Luis D. Molina
    
    
    
    Place:
    
    Tempe, Arizona, USATitle:
    
    Vice President ContractsDate:
    
    March 14, 2008Place:
    
    S. Jose Dos Campos, BrazilWitness:
Name:
    
    /s/ Julieta Diederichsen

Julieta Diederichsen
    
    
    
    Witness:
Name:
    
    /s/ David Lin

David Lin
 
  Page 4 of 4