alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 45.191 Pre-departure requirements. Before beginning each voyage, the towing vessel master must conduct the following: ( a ) *Weather forecast.* Determine the marine weather forecast along the planned route, and contact the dock operator at the destination port to get an update on local weather conditions.
( b ) *Inspection.* Inspect each barge of the tow to ensure that they meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) A valid load line certificate, if required, is on board;
( 2 ) The barge is not loaded deeper than permitted;
( 3 ) The deck and side shell plating are free of visible holes, fractures, or serious indentations, as well as damage that would be considered in excess of normal wear;
( 4 ) The cargo box side and end coamings are watertight;
( 5 ) All hatch and manhole dogs are in working condition, and all covers are closed and secured watertight;
( 6 ) All voids are free of excess water; and
( 7 ) Precautions have been taken to prevent shifting of cargo.
( c ) *Verifications.* On voyages north of St. Joseph, the towing vessel master must contact a mooring/docking facility in St. Joseph, Holland, Grand Haven, and Muskegon to verify that sufficient space is available to accommodate the tow. The tow cannot venture onto Lake Michigan without confirmed space available.
( d ) *Log entries.* Before getting underway, the towing vessel master must note in the logbook that the pre-departure barge inspections, verification of mooring/docking space availability, and weather forecast checks were performed, and record the freeboards of each barge.
[USCG-1998-4623, 67 FR 19690, Apr. 23, 2002, as amended at 75 FR 70604, Nov. 18, 2010; 75 FR 78928, Dec. 17, 2010; 76 FR 32327, June 6, 2011]
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0599 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NE

- 19

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet 

### Inspect LPT shaft and CVT Support Assy

. 8.0 $ 680.00 $ 680.00 71 $48,280.00 

### Replace CVT Support Assy

. $ 0.00 $3,080 $ 3,080.00 71 $218,680.00 Replace LPT shaft $ 0.00 $126,900 $ 126,900.00 2 $253,800.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### T he known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $520,760 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### Note 1: Assumes 50% of 359 suspect disks are still in service; also assumes 50% of 180 disks in active service are in US engines; therefore, approximately 90 disks will require FPI and EC inspections and an average of one disk will be rejected and will require a replacement

### Note 2: Assumes an average of two re

- inspections by FPIand EC before the disk is retired. One disk will be removed from service for the entire re

- inspection cycle of 89 and 88 engines respectively

. Note 3: Cost does not include engine di sassembl y, inspection, and consumables incurred during normal periodic hot section engine inspection. Cost does not include consumables during unscheduled engine removals.
**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action ”? YES * NO
* Explanati on: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO E xplanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanati on 

### :
#### Addie M. Smith, *Respondent, v.*Louis H. Cramer, *as Receiver of Taxes, etc.,*and others, *Appellants*.

Judgment modified by declaring tax of 1819 unauthorized and illegal, and setting aside sale and enjoining conveyance. As modified affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
§ 54.20-1 Scope (modifies UW-1 through UW-65). ( a ) Pressure vessels and vessel parts that are fabricated by welding must be as required by paragraphs UW-1 through UW-65 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this subchapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65170, Oct. 31, 2008]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BNY Mellon,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 5:14−cv−14526−JCO−MJH

Hon. John Corbett O'Meara

Usir N. El Bey [E−Filer],

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF REMAND

TO: 36TH DISTRICT COURT

 Enclosed are certified copies of the Order of Remand and this Court's docket sheet.

 Please acknowledge receipt of these documents by returning a time−stamped copy of this

Notice to:

Clerk's Office

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

231 W. Lafayette Boulevard, 5th Floor

Detroit, Michigan 48226

(313) 234−5005

Certification

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/ D. Peruski 

Deputy Clerk

Dated: January 20, 2015

5:14-cv-14526-JCO-MJH Doc # 27 Filed 01/20/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 910
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending December 3, 2005

|Filer                                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|UNITED BANCORPORATION OF WYOMING, INC. | * 3A3         | United Bancorporation of Wyoming, Inc., Jackson, Wyoming, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of First National Bank Holding Company, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank of Pinedale, both in Pinedale, Wyoming. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/30/2005
|Newspaper:                             | Not available
|Federal Register:                      | 12/30/2005   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: Rahul Pendse [rpendse@trinityconsultants.com]

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:31 PM

To: Fortin, Kelly

Cc: Land, Eva; Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com; 

Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com; Dougie.Robertson@deepwater.com

Subject: Anadarko DEWT Slide

Attachments: DRAFT EGOM Discoverer Spirit PSD Title V Permit Application Meeting 

02-07-13 V4.pdf

Kelly,

On behalf of Anadarko team, I would like to thank you and other EPA team members for the opportunity 

to meet and discuss the permit application and questions related to currently active permit. Per our 

discussion, please find DEWT system related slide attached herewith. Red colored strike-though items 

represent the parameters DEWT is not set up to monitor. Also, we would like to propose a phone call to 

discuss contents of DEWT system technical memorandum to provide rationale for Anadarko's request. 

Please advise whether you will be available for a phone call in the next week. Thanks again and we will 

keep you posted with the status of other action items we are currently working on. Have a good week.

Best Regards,

Rahul Pendse

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rahul Pendse│Managing Consultant│rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

Trinity Consultants│301 Main Street, Suite 900 │Baton Rouge, LA 70825

Office: 225-346-4003 │Fax: 225-346-4032│Cell: (714) 454-0518

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
§ 502.52 Notice of proposed rulemaking. ( a ) General notice of proposed rulemaking, including the information specified in § 502.61(c), shall be published in the Federal Register, unless all persons subject thereto are named and, either are personally served, or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law.
( b ) Except where notice or hearing is required by statute, paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice of the Commission, or when the Commission for good cause finds (and incorporates the findings and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. [Rule 52]
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 78 FR 45071, July 26, 2013; 81 FR 93835, Dec. 22, 2016]
CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OF Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of
-------------------------------------------------------------------
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 1992 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.
----------------------------------------------------------------

I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer of Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. hereby certify that to my
knowledge, Consolidated Medical Management's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the financial
statements contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of Consolidated Medical
Management, Inc.


Date:  November 15, 2004          /s/  Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.

                                  Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.,
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  Consolidated Medical Management


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,551
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         115,907
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,461
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          25,333
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,484
<LOANS>                                        122,325
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,190
<DEPOSITS>                                     133,017
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,544
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,134
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           873
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 166,190
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,871
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    57
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,256
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 612
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,979
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      230
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,748
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.79
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        82
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    60
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    142
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,669
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      175
<RECOVERIES>                                       100
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,824
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,198
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            626


</TABLE>
### Re: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 2007-0531-0677) 5 attachments David Brooks to: Paul Campanella 11/27/2012 10:34 AM Cc: John Schaeffer, Kathy Calvo, Marcus Aguilar, Mark Townsend Hi Paul, Attached is our contractor's report. The acute fish and Daphnia studies are adequate to satisfy the C1 test rule requirement. We have reviewed this report and it is acceptable.

68479-98-1_Final HPV2 DA_11.05.2012.docx 

### The following data gap remains for test rule-required endpoints: reproductive toxicity (i.e., p renatal developmental toxicity) and developmental toxicity . We have agreed to waive the requirement for reproductive toxicity testing (see pages 2, 129 and 130) , p rovided that Albemarle Corporation and Lonza Inc supply an adequate prenatal developmental toxicity test as specified by OPPTS 870.3700.
Dave
David Brooks Risk Assessment Division (7403M) High Production Volume Chemical Branch EPA East Room 6308 N (202) 564-8603

Paul Campanella 09/06/2012 12:32:39 PM David, Please submit the attached documents fo...
From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US To: David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US, Kathy Calvo/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/06/2012 12:32 PM Subject: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 2007-0531-0677) 5 attachments David, Please submit the attached documents for review. Thanks
[attachment "Albemarle C1 48hr Acute Daphnia.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "Albemarle C1 96hr Static Acute Fathead.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing Branch Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashin g ton, D.C. 202-564-8091
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

David St. Ann, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Todd McLean, et al., 

Defendants. 

________________________________/

Case No. 15-cv-11770 

Judith E. Levy 

United States District Judge 

Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti 

SECOND AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

PATTI’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [58] 

 On January 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti issued a 

Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 58) recommending that the Court 

grant in part and deny in part defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment. (Dkt. 48.) Magistrate Judge Patti recommends that the 

Court dismiss with prejudice plaintiff’s claims regarding a 

constitutional right to a particular security classification, dismiss 

without prejudice plaintiff’s claims against defendant Buczek for failure 

to exhaust his administrative remedies, and not dismiss plaintiff’s 
2 

claims for retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 

(Dkt. 58 at 17-18.) 

 The parties were required to file specific written objections within 

14 days of service, or by January 17, 2018. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. 

Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). On January 25, 2018, plaintiff filed an objection to 

the dismissal without prejudice of his claims against defendant Buczek. 

(Dkt. 61.) Although dated January 16, 2018, the objection was not 

mailed until January 22, 2018 (Dkt. 61 at 21), and is therefore 

untimely. The Court also notes that plaintiff’s claims against Buczek 

will be denied without prejudice, and so plaintiff may assert those 

claims in another lawsuit if he can show he has exhausted his 

administrative remedies. 

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation, and concurs in the reasoning and result. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that: 

The Court’s prior adoption of the Report and Recommendation 

(Dkt. 60) is WITHDRAWN; 

 The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 
3 

 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 48) is GRANTED 

IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 

 Plaintiff’s claims asserting a constitutional right to a particular 

security classification are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 

 Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Buczek are DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 

 Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation and intentional infliction of 

emotional distress are NOT DISMISSED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 29, 2018 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s 

ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 29, 2018. 

s/Shawna Burns 

SHAWNA BURNS 

Case Manager
2:15-cv-12363-GAD-SDD Doc # 23 Filed 11/16/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 234
2:15-cv-12363-GAD-SDD Doc # 23 Filed 11/16/15 Pg 2 of 6 Pg ID 235
2:15-cv-12363-GAD-SDD Doc # 23 Filed 11/16/15 Pg 3 of 6 Pg ID 236
2:15-cv-12363-GAD-SDD Doc # 23 Filed 11/16/15 Pg 4 of 6 Pg ID 237
2:15-cv-12363-GAD-SDD Doc # 23 Filed 11/16/15 Pg 5 of 6 Pg ID 238
2:15-cv-12363-GAD-SDD Doc # 23 Filed 11/16/15 Pg 6 of 6 Pg ID 239
Argued and submitted January 26,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration March 6, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Kerry T. Grewell, Claimant. Kerry T. GREWELL, *Petitioner, v.*HARRIS TRANSPORT CO. and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(94-07439; CA A88409)

912 P2d 432

Meagan A. Flynn argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Pozzi Wilson Atchison.

Steven R. Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Phillips v. Hammond,*139 Or App 506, 912 P2d 430 (1996); *Carroll v. Boise Cascade Corp.,*138 Or App 610, 910 P2d 1111 (1996).
§ 50.01-10 Purpose of regulations. ( a ) The purpose of the regulations in this subchapter is to set forth minimum requirements for marine engineering details for various types of vessels in accordance with the intent of title 52 of the Revised Statutes and acts amendatory thereof or supplemental thereto as well as to implement various international conventions for safety of life at sea and other treaties, which contain requirements affecting marine engineering. The regulations in this subchapter have the force of law.
( b ) All marine engineering details, such as boilers, pressure vessels, main and auxiliary machinery, piping, valves, and fittings, must be designed, constructed, and installed in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, except when specifically modified by the regulations in another subchapter in this chapter for a particular type of vessel or where a specific installation may be required or permitted.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18808, Dec. 18, 1968, CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48049, Sept. 18, 1995; USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50092, June 12, 2024]