alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tabular presentation



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 MERCURY GENERAL CORPORATION BOARD FEES 
 YEAR 2005 
  

							
	 	  	PRIOR FEES

	  	CURRENT FEES


	 Board of Directors Quarterly Retainer
	  	$	2,500	  	$	3,000
	 Board of Directors Per Meeting Fee
	  	$	2,500	  	$	3,000
			
	 Audit Committee Per Meeting Fee
	  	$	2,000	  	$	2,500
	 Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	 	none	  	$	1,500
			
	 Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Per Meeting Fee
	  	$	1,000	  	$	1,000
	 Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair Per Meeting Fee
	  	 	none	  	$	1,500
	 Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	 	none	  	$	1,500
			
	 Compensation Committee Per Meeting Fee
	  	$	500	  	$	500
	 Compensation Committee Chair Compensation
	  	$	100 per hour	  	$	150 per hour
#### CHALES J. TAYLOR, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY BERNER, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF MUTUAL MINERAL WATER WORKS, APPELLANT. SUSIE TAYLOR, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY BERNER, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF MUTUAL MINERAL WATER WORKS, APPELLANT.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided July 3, 1929.

Before Justices Tbenchabd, Kalisch and Lloyd.

For the appellant, *Samuel Harber.*

For the respondents, *Levitan, Levitan & Auerbach.*

Peb Cueiam.

The question presented on these appeals is whether the proofs established by the plaintiff in the trial below justified *598the application of the doctrine of res ipsa *loquitur.*The actions were to recover damages for injuries received t>3r Susie Taylor, one of the plaintiffs, from the explosion of a bottle containing vich3r, which had been sold and delivered to the plaintiff’s employer by the defendant-appellant. While not the manufacturer of the vichy, the defendant was engaged in the bottling business, and as part of such business had filled the bottle, which, on the occasion in question, exploded.

The plaintiff’s proofs established this and nothing more. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case the defendant moved for a nonsuit, and on the ground, among others, that there was no proof of negligence in the defendant or his servant. The motion was denied, and the defendant then offered proofs, tending to show that the bottle used was purchased from a reputable manufacturer, and that proper care was used in the bottling of its contents. At the conclusion of the entire case the defendant moved the court for the direction of a verdict in his favor. This also the court denied. From the judgments entered defendant appeals.

The grounds of appeal are that the rulings on these motions were erroneous, and that the charge to the jury was prejudicial to the defendant. It is sufficient to say with respect to the instructions, that no specific part of the charge was brought to the attention of the court by exception, and it is not, therefore, before us.

The refusal of the motions for nonsuit and the motions for the direction of verdicts for the defendant were properly refused. The defendant, as a bottler, was obliged to rise reasonable care in the filling of the bottle of vieh3r. With the exercise of reasonable care it is obvious that an explosition, such as here occurred, does not ordinarily result. This being true, we think the rule of *res ipsa loquitur*applied, and that it 'was permissible for the jury to infer from the occurrence of the explosion want of such reasonable care. The proofs presented by the defendant did not remove the cases from the consideration of that body. *Hughes*v. *Atlantic City Railroad,*85 *N. J. L. 212.*

The judgments are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.16

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F
(the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Development Project  Cigar Lake, Mineral Reserves and Resources and
Governance  Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 dated February 24, 2012 for the Cigar Lake property; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the heading Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year
ended December 31, 2011 dated February 9, 2012 for the Cigar Lake property,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical
Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock
Option Plan, and registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan.

Sincerely,



|                        |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Grant J. H. Goddard
|Name:                   |  | Grant J. H. Goddard, P. Eng.                                 
|Title:                  |  | Vice-President, Saskatchewan Mining North, Cameco Corporation
|                        | 
|Date:                   |  | February 24, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         111,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  658,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,670,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,345,000
<PP&E>                                       1,982,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,724,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,638,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,379,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       462,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,478,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,638,000
<SALES>                                      3,164,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,164,000
<CGS>                                        3,077,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,216,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,065,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,065,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,065,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                 <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-1993             JUN-30-1993
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-1992             JAN-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1993             MAR-31-1993
<CASH>                                        0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                  0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0                       0
<PP&E>                                        0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    21,471                  21,471
<BONDS>                                       0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                   0                       0
<COMMON>                                 16,278                  16,278
<OTHER-SE>                              (37,749)                (37,749)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  0                       0
<SALES>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0                       0
<CGS>                                         0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          5,240                   1,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0                       0
<CHANGES>                                     0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (5,240)                 (1,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.00)                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.00)                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) by American MedicalAlert Corp. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jack Rhian          |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Jack Rhian              |
|   | President and           |
|   | Chief Operating Officer |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by AmericanMedical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.**

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1431** 

KATHLEEN BLICK; HAROLD BLICK , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,
v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a/k/a N.A. Wells Fargo Bank; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as “ Trustee ” for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006

- WF1 Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006

- WF1; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC, as

“ Substitute Trustee ; ” BIERMAN, GEESING, WARD & WOOD, LLC, as

“ Attorneys for Equity Trustees, LLC , ” Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Charlottesville
. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00081

- NKM

- RSB )

Submitted : July 31, 2012 Decided: August 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ , and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Kathleen Blick , Harold Blick, Appellants Pro Se. John Curtis Lynch , Ethan G. Ostroff , TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP , Virginia Beach, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza , TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, McLean, Virginia ; Rob ert Ryan Michael , BIERMAN GEESING WARD & WOOD, LLC , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Kathleen Blick and Harold Blick appeal the district
court ’ s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their action to quiet title in real property
. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A ccordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , No. 3:11

- cv - 00081

- NKM

- RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2012)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        864,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               980,776
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               360,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                615,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            615,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   615,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
FirstCity Financial Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Numbers 333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and 33-09485) on Forms S-3
and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated February 13,
2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of FirstCity Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive
income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual
report on Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation. Our report refers to a
change in the presentation of preferred stock in 2003, a change in the
classification of gains associated with the early extinguishment of debt in
2002, and a change in the method of accounting for residual interests in
securitized financial assets in 2001.

KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2004
#### § 67.130 Submission of applications.

All applications made under this subpart and all subsequent filings to effect documentation, except as provided in § 67.133(b), must be submitted to the National Vessel Documentation Center.

[CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31604, June 15, 1995]
#### JERSEY PUBLISHING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RELATOR, v. JOHN McCUTCHEON, STATE COMPTROLLER, RESPONDENT.

Argued May 7, 1929

Decided May 22, 1929.

Before Justices Teenciiabd and Lloyd.

Por tlie relator, *John G. Flanigan*and *Crawford Jamison.*

For the respondent, *William A. Stevens,*attorney-general, and *Duane F. Minará,*assistant attorney-general.

Pee Cueiam.

The relator has presented, on notice, a petition and affidavits, and asks for a peremptory writ of *mandamus.*In such case ordinarily a peremptory writ should not be awarded, but an alternative writ at most. *State*v. *Elkinton,*30 *N. J. L.*337.

At the argument, in an informal wajr, the respondent caused to be laid before us by affidavit matters which it was contended constitute a sufficient reason for his refusal of the demand made upon him.

Inasmuch as the facts stated in the affidavit thus presented are not admitted by the relator, we think we are not permitted, in considering the application, to examine the matters set forth therein, but that an alternative writ should issue to the end that by formal return or other or further *516pleadings an issue may be raised and appropriate action thereon taken by the court; upon which determination the right of review may be preserved.

A rule- will be entered for an alternative writ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

|Date: July 20, 2007 |  | /s/ JAMES T. SARTAINJames T. Sartain Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Teresa A. Herbert, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Independence Holding Company; 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004 

/s/  Teresa A. Herbert

Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer