alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Cheniere Energy, Inc.


 Exhibit 4.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
  
 CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. 
  
 2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 Increasing Number of Shares Subject to the Plan 
  
 WHEREAS, Cheniere Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of
authorized shares thereunder from 1,000,000 to 4,000,000; 
  
 NOW
THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended, effective as of December 15, 2004, as follows: 
  
 Section 1.2 of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows: 
  
 Shares Subject to the Plan 
  
 The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock, $.003 par value per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) that may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 4,000,000. No more than 500,000 shares of Common Stock
shall be issued to any one Participant in any one calendar year. Notwithstanding the above, however, in the event that at any time after the Effective Date the outstanding shares of Common Stock are changed into or exchanged for a different number
or kind of shares or other securities of the Company by reason of a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares or the like, the aggregate number and class of securities available
under the Plan shall be ratably adjusted by the Committee (as defined below), whose determination shall be final and binding upon the Company and all other interested persons. In the event the number of shares to be delivered upon the exercise or
payment of any Award granted under the Plan is reduced for any reason whatsoever or in the event any Award granted under the Plan can no longer under any circumstances be exercised or paid, the number of shares no longer subject to such Award shall
thereupon be released from such Award and shall thereafter be available under the Plan for the grant of additional Awards. Shares issued pursuant to the Plan (i) may be treasury shares, authorized but unissued shares or, if applicable, shares
acquired in the open market and (ii) shall be fully paid and nonassessable. 
  
 This amendment only amends Section 1.2 of the Plan and does not further amend any other provisions of the Plan.
<PAGE> 1

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A



     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
            For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an
          exhibit the Annual Servicing Report of Company's
          Independent Public Accountants.


                  Commission File No. 0-21979

              HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1996-1
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)


                   HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
                    (Administrator of the Trust)
       (Exact name as specified in Administrator's charter)



            DELAWARE                      36-3670374
(State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of Administrator)    Identification Number of
                                   Registrant)


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Administrator)


Administrator's telephone number including area code (847)564-5000


<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

                         SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
report to be signed on behalf of the Household Consumer Loan Trust
1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                             HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Administrator of and on behalf of the

                          HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 8, 2000       By: /s/John W. Blenke
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary










<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3

                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants Annual Servicing
              Report dated March 28, 2000.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul D. Meyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL D. MEYER                    
|Paul D. Meyer                        
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|June 2, 2004
#### Emeline F. Tooker, Respondent, *v.*Joseph S. Winston, *Appel*lant.

Judgment modified as directed in opinion. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.,

and by Brady, J., dissenting.
§ 67.163 Renewal of endorsement. ( a ) *Requirement for renewal of endorsement.* Endorsements on Certificates of Documentation are valid for 1 year, except for Recreational Endorsements on Certificates of Documentation, which are valid for 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 years. However, a Certificate of Documentation with a Recreational Endorsement and a Commercial Endorsement will only be valid for 1 year. Prior to the expiration of an endorsement, the owner of a vessel, which is not exempt from the requirement for documentation under paragraph (c) of § 67.9, must apply for renewal of the endorsement(s) by complying with paragraph (b) of this section. The owner of a vessel exempt from the requirement for documentation under paragraph (c) of § 67.9 must either: ( 1 ) Apply for renewal of the endorsement by complying with paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) Place the Certificate of Documentation on deposit in accordance with § 67.165.
( b ) *Renewal application.* The owner of a vessel must apply for renewal of each endorsement by executing a Vessel Renewal Notification, Application for Renewal (CG-1280) certifying that the information contained in the Certificate of Documentation and any endorsement(s) thereon remains accurate, and that the Certificate has not been lost, mutilated, or wrongfully withheld. The completed CG-1280 must be sent to the Director, National Vessel Documentation Center.
( c ) *Requirement for renewal of recreational endorsements.* A Certificate of Documentation for a recreational vessel and the renewal of such a certificate will be effective for 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 years for such a Certificate of Documentation for such vessel or the renewal thereof.
Note:
Renewal of endorsements on a Certificate of Documentation may be denied if the vessel owner is the subject of an outstanding civil penalty assessed by the Coast Guard.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31604, June 15, 1995; USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52191, Sept. 30, 1998; USCG-2016-0531, 82 FR 43864, Sept. 20, 2017; USCG-2020-0215, 86 FR 5031, Jan. 19, 2021; USCG-2023-0305, 88 FR 77901, Nov. 14, 2023]
98-1760.

#### Johnson v. Russell.

Warren App. No. CA98-06-069. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Warren County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due October 26,1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
§ 502.53 Participation in rulemaking. ( a ) Interested persons will be afforded an opportunity to participate in rulemaking through submission of written data, views, or arguments, with or without opportunity for oral presentation. No replies to the written submissions will be allowed unless, because of the nature of the proceeding, the Commission indicates that replies would be necessary or desirable for the formulation of a just and reasonable rule, except that, where the proposed rules are such as are required by statute to be made on the record after opportunity for a hearing, such hearing shall be conducted pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557, and the procedure shall be the same as stated in subpart L of this part. In the event that replies or succeeding rounds of comments are permitted, copies shall be served on all prior participants in the proceeding. A list of participants may be obtained from the Secretary of the Commission.
( b ) In those rulemaking proceedings in which respondents are named, interested persons who wish to participate shall file a petition to intervene in accordance with the provisions of § 502.72 [Rule 53.]
( c ) Where a formal hearing is held in a rulemaking proceeding, interested persons will be afforded an opportunity to participate through submission of relevant, material, reliable, and probative written evidence properly verified, except that such evidence submitted by persons not present at the hearing will not be made a part of the record if objected to by any party on the ground that the person who submits the evidence is not present for cross-examination.
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 55 FR 28399, July 11, 1990; 78 FR 45071, July 26, 2013; 81 FR 93835, Dec. 22, 2016]
§ 54.20-2 Fabrication for hazardous materials (replaces UW-2(a)). ( a ) Pressure vessels containing hazardous materials as defined in § 150.115 of this subchapter must be of the class and construction required by subchapters D, I, or O of this chapter, or, when not specified, of a class determined by the Commandant.
( b ) Class III pressure vessels must not be used for the storage or stowage of hazardous materials unless there is specific authorization in subchapters D, I, or O of this chapter.
[CGD 77-147, 47 FR 21810, May 20, 1982]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 9, 2009

|Filer                                   | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS GUARANTY FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC         | Interagency Notice of Change in Bank Control submitted by the John M. St. Clair, Jr. Trust, Irvine, KY (Kathy Dale Samples, Trustee) of its intent to retain control of 100% of the outstanding voting shares of Citizens Guaranty Financial Corporation, Irvine, KY which controls Citizens Guaranty Bank, Richmond, KY. | Newspaper:05/21/2009Federal Register:05/14/2009
|Newspaper:                              | 05/21/2009 
|Federal Register:                       | 05/14/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 1, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending January 17, 2009

|Filer                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|STANDARD CHARTERED BANK | FBSEA          | Standard Chartered Bank, London, United Kingdom  to establish a representative office in Houston, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:              | Not available 
|Federal Register:       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.2










CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the
undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to
such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.












Dated:
      November 4, 2009
            /s/ Jeffery
  StricklandJeffery
      StricklandChief
      Financial Officer










The foregoing certification is made
solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not for any other
purpose.




























23
# C_2011347EN.01003401.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/34

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Eurofer v Commission

(Case T-381/11 R)

(Interim relief - Environment - Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC - Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision - Application for interim measures - Admissibility - Urgency)

2011/C 347/60

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending May 17, 2008

|Filer                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|STANDARD CHARTERED BANK | FBSEA          | Standard Chartered Bank, London, England, to establish representative offices in Atlanta, Georgia, Miami, Florida, and San Francisco and San Diego, California pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(2)(i)(B)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:              | Not available 
|Federal Register:       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000016214-FEB-201109:52 AM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DARRYL BULLARD, 

 

Petitioner, Case No. 1:15-cv-12370 

 Hon. Thomas L. Ludington 

v. 

 

RANDALL HASS, 

Respondent. 

___________________________________/ 

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 

PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

 Petitioner Darryl Bullard, a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on July 1, 2015. ECF No. 1. On June 10, 2016, the Court issued an 

opinion and order denying Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, denying a certificate 

of appealability, and – having determined that any appeal would be frivolous – denying 

Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 15. 

 Petitioner has now filed an application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. ECF No. 

18. This Court has already determined that Petitioner is not entitled to proceed in this fashion 

because any appeal of the Court’s order would be frivolous. Petitioner has not stated any grounds 

sufficient to reconsider that prior determination. L.R. 7.1(h)(1). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Bullard’s application to appeal in forma 

pauperis, ECF No. 18, is DENIED. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: July 13, 2016 

 

1:15-cv-12370-TLL-RSW Doc # 20 Filed 07/13/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2288
- 2 - 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on July 13, 2016. 

 s/Julie Owens 

 JULIE OWENS, Case Manager 

 Acting in the absence of Michael Sian 

1:15-cv-12370-TLL-RSW Doc # 20 Filed 07/13/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2289