alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013129EN.01000301.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/3

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto — Portugal) — Sindicato dos Bancários do Norte, Sindicato dos Bancários do Centro, Sindicato dos Bancários do Sul e Ilhas, Luís Miguel Rodrigues Teixeira de Melo v BPN — Banco Português de Negócios SA

(Case C-128/12) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - National legislation establishing salary reductions for certain public sector workers - Failure to implement European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)

2013/C 129/04

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Sindicato dos Bancários do Norte, Sindicato dos Bancários do Centro, Sindicato dos Bancários do Sul e Ilhas, Luís Miguel Rodrigues Teixeira de Melo

Applicants:

Defendant: BPN — Banco Português de Negócios SA

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto — Interpretation of Articles 20, 21(1) and 31(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1) — Observance of the principles of equality and non-discrimination and of the right to fair and just working conditions — National legislation providing for salary reductions for certain public sector workers

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction with regard to the request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto (Portugal), made by decision of 6 January 2012.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 26.5.2012.

1

---
#### § 502.136 Enforcement.

In the event of failure to comply with any subpoena or order issued in connection therewith, the Commission may seek enforcement as provided in § 502.150(b). [Rule 136.]

[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 76 FR 10262, Feb. 24, 2011; 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016]
2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 1 of 16    Pg ID 1

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 2 of 16    Pg ID 2

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 3 of 16    Pg ID 3

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 4 of 16    Pg ID 4

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 5 of 16    Pg ID 5

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 6 of 16    Pg ID 6

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 7 of 16    Pg ID 7

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 8 of 16    Pg ID 8

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 9 of 16    Pg ID 9

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 10 of 16    Pg ID 10

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 11 of 16    Pg ID 11

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 12 of 16    Pg ID 12

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 13 of 16    Pg ID 13

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 14 of 16    Pg ID 14

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 15 of 16    Pg ID 15

2:15-cv-12455-GAD-EAS   Doc # 1   Filed 07/10/15   Pg 16 of 16    Pg ID 16
#### § 502.115 Service in rulemaking and petition proceedings.

Service on all prior participants in a rulemaking or a petition proceeding must be shown when submitting comments or replies beyond the initial round, including those involving disposition of petitions for rulemaking (Rule 51), petitions for declaratory order (Rule 75), petitions general (Rule 76), notices of proposed rulemaking (Rule 52), proceedings under section 19 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920, (46 U.S.C. 42101) (Part 550), and proceedings under section 13(b)(6) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U. S.C. 41108(d)) (Part 560). A list of all participants may be obtained from the Secretary of the Commission.

[80 FR 57306, Sept. 23, 2015]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0252 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEVIN EARL MORRIS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 1, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 25 2023

09/25/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0252
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                    906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  the  undersigned  officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d),  as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and that the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 6, 2006                     /s/ Jeffery Strickland
                                            ----------------------
                                            Jeffery Strickland
                                            Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and
not for any other purpose.
§ 32.40-60 Crew accommodations on tankships of less than 100 gross tons and manned tank barges—TB/ALL. ( a ) The crew accommodations on all tankships of less than 100 gross tons and all manned tank barges must have sufficient size and equipment, and be adequately constructed to provide for the protection of the crew in manner practicable for the size, facilities, and service of the tank vessel.
( b ) The crew accommodations must be consistent with the principles underlying the requirements for crew accommodations of tankships of 100 gross tons or more.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
The Board of DirectorsPowerCerv Corporation
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-3960, 333-50621 and333-90827) pertaining to the PowerCerv Corporation 1995 StockOption Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-90825) pertaining toStock Option Agreements of our report dated January 20,2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of PowerCerv Corporation included in the Annual Report(Form 10K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.
         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Tampa, FloridaMarch 27, 2000
52
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40819

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LIONEL SANCHEZ-CAMACHO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-765-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lionel SanchezCamacho has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Camacho has filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Sanchez-Camacho’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 7, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40819 Document: 00515374675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2020
No. 19-40819

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-40819 Document: 00515374675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2020
#### § 53.05-3 Materials (modifies HG-401.2).

Materials for valves must be in accordance with HG-401.2 of Section IV of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 53.01-1) except that nonmetallic materials may be used only for gaskets and packing.

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65164, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 502.43 Substitution of parties.

The Commission or presiding officer may order an appropriate substitution of parties in the event of a party's death, incompetence, transfer of its interest, or other appropriate circumstance. [Rule 43]

[78 FR 45071, July 26, 2013]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 21, 2008

|Filer                  | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FIRST SECURITY BANCORP | * 3A3       | First Security Bancorp, Searcy, Arkansas, to acquire 100 percent of Union Bancshares of Benton, Inc., Benton, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire The Union Bank of Benton, Benton, Arkansas. | Newspaper:07/17/2008Federal Register:07/14/2008
|Newspaper:             | 07/17/2008 
|Federal Register:      | 07/14/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                        | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|CITIZENS B&TC, VAN BUREN, ARKANSAS            | 192147  | 01/07/2008 | 04/23/2008     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|CITIZENS BK, HARTFORD, KENTUCKY               | 535641  | 03/10/2008 | 06/14/2008     | S         | Small Bank 
|CITIZENS BK, BATESVILLE, ARKANSAS             | 856748  | 01/14/2008 | 04/25/2008     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|FIRST SECURITY BK OF CONWAY, CONWAY, ARKANSAS | 1890374 | 02/11/2008 | 05/26/2008     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|PATRIOT BK, MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE             | 3120646 | 02/25/2008 | 06/04/2008     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,058,674      
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,711     
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         104,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,212,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          564,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,732     
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,632,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,212,884
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,820
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               643,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               522,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (957,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (957,626)         
<DISCONTINUED>                                 614,096
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (343,530)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Argued and submitted September 18,

reversed and remanded October 25, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Helen K. Lara, Claimant. MORSE BROTHERS, INC. and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Petitioners, *v.*Helen K. LARA, *Respondent.*

(WCB 93-12770; CA A86955)

904 P2d 200

Paul L. Roess argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Charles J. Cheek argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cheek & Tiscornia.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).
Exhibit 31.1



I, E. Michael Thoben, III, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 2, 2004



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III                     
|E. Michael Thoben, III                         
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 8, 2008

|Filer                                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., THE | * 3A5* 3A3    | Application by The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to acquire National City Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/02/2008
|Newspaper:                              | Not available
|Federal Register:                       | 12/02/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2012209EN.01000401.xml

| 14.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Bydgoszczy (Poland), lodged on 23 April 2012 — Emerging Markets Series of DFA Investment Trust Company v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy

(Case C-190/12)

2012/C 209/05

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Bydgoszczy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Emerging Markets Series of DFA Investment Trust Company

Applicant:

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 56(1) EC (now Article 63 TFEU) apply to an assessment of the permissibility of the application by a Member State of provisions of national law which draw a distinction between the legal situation of taxable persons in such a way that they grant, as part of a general tax exemption, an exemption from flat-rate corporation tax on dividends received by investment funds established in a Member State of the European Union but do not provide for such an exemption for an investment fund which is resident for tax purposes in the USA? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 56(1) EC (now Article 63 TFEU) apply to an assessment of the permissibility of the application by a Member State of provisions of national law which draw a distinction between the legal situation of taxable persons in such a way that they grant, as part of a general tax exemption, an exemption from flat-rate corporation tax on dividends received by investment funds established in a Member State of the European Union but do not provide for such an exemption for an investment fund which is resident for tax purposes in the USA?

| 2. | Can the difference between the treatment of funds established in a non-member country and that of funds established in a Member State of the European Union, as provided for in national law with regard to the exemption relating to corporation tax, be regarded as legally justified in the light of Article 58(1)(a) EC, in conjunction with Article 58(3) EC (now Article 65(1)(a) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 65(3) TFEU)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can the difference between the treatment of funds established in a non-member country and that of funds established in a Member State of the European Union, as provided for in national law with regard to the exemption relating to corporation tax, be regarded as legally justified in the light of Article 58(1)(a) EC, in conjunction with Article 58(3) EC (now Article 65(1)(a) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 65(3) TFEU)?

---
2:15-cv-11691-MAG-RSW Doc # 10 Filed 06/29/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 51
2:15-cv-11691-MAG-RSW Doc # 10 Filed 06/29/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 52
2:15-cv-11691-MAG-RSW Doc # 10 Filed 06/29/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 53