alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32(a)


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly
report of Axonyx Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Marvin S. Hausman, M.D, Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934;  and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

Marvin S. Hausman, M.D
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


May 14, 2004


A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,  acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of  this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 17, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PAUL M. HARRIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1923

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Polk County; William Sites, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 10, 2005



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Elkins, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Elkins*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 42.]

(No. 97-2321

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*R. Larry Schneider,*Union County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Rick Rodger,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.'
In the Missouri Court of Appeals 

Eastern District 

MARCH 18, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b). 

1. ED97497 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL PATTERSON, 

APP 

2. ED99735 RONALD BURSTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 

3. ED99758 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. RAYMOND TIMMERMEIER, 

APP 

4. ED99766 KEITH COSTELLO II, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 

5. ED99810 JOSEPH R. POTTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 

6. ED99859 BOBBIE MORRIS, APP V DES, RES 

7. ED100043 KIM E. GARDNER, APP V. CLAIRE GARDNER, RES 

8. ED100054 BLANCA SINGH, APP V. CLIENT SERVICES & DES, RES 

9. ED100093 CARTER WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 

10. ED100177 RITA CRAWFORD-GRAHAM, APP V. CONVERGYS & DES, 

RES 

11. ED100231 KEISHA WILLIAMS, APP V. DES, RES
#### § 501.1 Purpose.

This part describes the organization, functions, and the delegation of authority within, the Federal Maritime Commission (“Commission”).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               2,115
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    14,602
<PP&E>                                               1,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      16,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,601
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 2
<OTHER-SE>                                          13,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        16,264
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        91
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       42,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (44,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (42,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (44,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (2.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (2.69)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Hudson Insurance 
Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplemental No. 8 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following Company:
    Hudson Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i>25054). Business Address: 
17 State Street, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10004. Phone: (212) 978-2851. 
Underwriting Limitation b/: $11,542,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, 
AR, CA, CO, DE, DC, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, 
MT, NE, NV, NJ, NIM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WV, 
WI, WY. Incorporated IN: Delaware.

Federal-bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies 
of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision, to reflect 
this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificate are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 07-1954 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### Elizabeth Meltzer, *Executrix, etc., Respondent, v.*Edwin N. Doll, *Executor, etc., Appellant*.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Order of 5th December, 1881, allowing costs to plaintiff, affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Order of April 19, 1882, denying new trial upon ground of newly discovered evidence, affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Order denying motion to punish W. B. Lynes for contempt; appeal dismissed, with costs and disbursements for non-service of papers. Judge Cullen not sitting in the appeal from this order. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          25,869                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,465                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               316,334                       0
<PP&E>                                          18,009                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,464                   5,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,511                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,898                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,116                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,511                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,705                 178,108
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,759                  28,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,624)                (29,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (16,832)                (25,751)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,832)                (25,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
                

</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GtmAlm c. MANN 

-.- 

t&arch 20, 1939 

county haltor 

zarrison county 

Xerahall, Tsxes 

near sir: 

a... . 
xr . Chas. ii. Sartin, i.kroh 20, 193Q, Fag8 2 

. 

institution to whlci~ he he8 been oommitted. 

This Department hes preriosly held in a mmher of opinions with wklch we entirely oonaur, that the 

statutes do not provide or allow any rees or compensaffon 

to officers for their servioes in juvenile cases tried 

axid disposed of in the oounty court. 

You are mmpootfully advised that it 18 the 

opinion of thie Dapertaent that the aounty awumt lealy 

pay a constable a isa or a iae to any other offiaer ior 

l r r lo ea r ender ed ia juvo nlla a e na . 

Trusting that the above uumm8 your inqdry, 

woalw 

Vary truly your6 

ATTOlUUEYGEREBALOFTXA8 

~Alr:Aw 

APPROVELk
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending May 17, 2008

|Filer               | Filing Type        | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|EAGLE BANCORP, INC. | * 3A5* 18C* Branch | Eagle Bancorp, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation, Bethesda, Maryland and thereby indirectly acquire Fidelity & Trust Bank, Bethesda, Maryland. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/16/2008
|Newspaper:          | Not available     
|Federal Register:   | 06/16/2008        

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANDREW GROSS, III,

Petitioner,

v. CASE No. 15-CV-10637

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

ORDER OF TRANSFER

I.

This is a habeas case under to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is a federal prisoner

confined at the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana. He is serving a

120-month sentence following his guilty plea to one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 513

(counterfeit securities), which was entered in this district before another judge. See

United States of America v. Andrew Gross, Case No. 02-CR-80163-DT (amended

judgment of sentence filed on March 2, 2006). Petitioner challenges the validity of his

federal criminal conviction and sentence. He seeks release from custody and monetary

damages.1

 For the reasons that follow, the petition will be transferred to the federal

district court where Petitioner is incarcerated.

II.

A petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 must be filed in the district having jurisdiction

1

Petitioner has filed multiple post-judgment motions in his criminal case, including

motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which have been denied by the district court and/or

transferred to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

2:15-cv-10637-AC-MJH Doc # 3 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 27
over the petitioner’s custodian. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004); Braden

v. 30th Judicial Cir. Ct., 410 U.S. 484, 499-500 (1973); In re Hanserd, 123 F.3d 922,

925 (6th Cir. 1997). Petitioner is incarcerated in Terre Haute, Indiana. Thus, the Court

does not have jurisdiction to review the petition.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, the Court is authorized to transfer the petition to the

federal district court having jurisdiction over Petitioner’s custodian. Terre Haute, Indiana

is located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 94(b)(2). Thus, a transfer to

that federal court is appropraite. The Court makes no determination as to the

procedural or substantive merits of Petitioner's claims.

III.

Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division.

SO ORDERED.

 S/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 3, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, March 3, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Sakne Chami

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2

2:15-cv-10637-AC-MJH Doc # 3 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 28
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 8, 1995 (40), Para 40.18 Recorded Vote]
[Page 348]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.40.18  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendment submitted by Mr. BRYANT:

       Page 18, beginning on line 6, strike subsections (b) and 
     (c) and insert the following (and redesignate the succeeding 
     subsections accordingly):
       ``(b) Pleading Requirement.--In any action arising under 
     this title in which the plaintiff may recover money damages 
     only if it proves that the defendant acted with scienter, the 
     plaintiff must allege in its complaint facts suggesting that 
     the defendant acted with that state of mind.

Yeas

168

It was decided in the

Nays

255

negative

Answered present

1
```
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 133 filed 05/07/19 PageID.1281 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 133 filed 05/07/19 PageID.1282 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management 
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 13, 2007, from 1 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor), 
Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 
meeting. Note: Non-Government attendees to the meeting must go through 
security and be escorted to and from the conference room. Attendees 
with laptops will be required to register them at the security desk 
upon arrival and departure. Agenda items will be posted on 
www.rtca.org. Web-site.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 11, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-2515 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M