alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**MinnesotaAdvisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights**

| **Alan Weinblatt, *Chairperson***St. Paul

**Sonia M. Alvarez**      Minneapolis
**Terry      M. Louie**      Andover
**T. Jeff Bangsberg**      New Hope  
**John G. Morrow**      Cass Lake
**Lester Collins**        St. Paul
**Laverne Flentie      Orwoll**Rochester
**Geraldine L.      Kozlowski**Hermantown
**Neva R. Walker**      Minneapolis
**Thomas R.      Lawrence**      Bloomington
**Carol L.      Wirtschafter**      Minneapolis
**Acknowledgments**

TheMinnesota Advisory Committee wishes to acknowledge Harvey Stalwick, Ph.D.,professor of social work, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, for hisassistance in the design and coordination of the survey of households inMoorhead; as well as Amy Phillips, assistant professor of social work atMoorhead State University. The Committee also wishes to thank the followingstudent interns from Concordia College for their assistance in conducting thesurvey: Michelle Anderson, Michelle Messer, Molly Nefsted, Nancy Neihamer, ChrisSaby, Stacy Sieling, Dee Ann Simmons, Angela Stark, Tracy Thiel, and MelissaWarren. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 62.25-25 Programmable systems and devices. ( a ) Programmable control or alarm system logic must not be altered after Design Verification testing without the approval of the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI). (See subpart 61.40 of this subchapter, Design Verification Tests). Safety control or automatic alarm systems must be provided with means, acceptable to the cognizant OCMI, to make sure setpoints remain within the safe operating range of the equipment.
( b ) Operating programs for microprocessor-based or computer-based vital control, alarm, and monitoring systems must be stored in non-volatile memory and automatically operate on supply power resumption.
( c ) If a microprocessor-based or computer-based system serves both vital and non-vital systems, hardware and software priorities must favor the vital systems.
( d ) All required manuals, records, and instructions for automatic or remote control or monitoring systems must be readily available aboard the vessel.
[CGD 81-030, 53 FR 17838, May 18, 1988; 53 FR 19090, May 26, 1988; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58280, Sept. 29, 2014; USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50192, June 12, 2024]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending July 8, 2006

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|VALLEY COMMERCE BANCORP | CIC           | The Banc Funds Company, L.L.C., Banc Fund V L.P., Banc Fund VI L.P., and Banc Fund VII L.P., all of Chicago, Illinois, to acquire up to 24.9 percent of Valley Commerce Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire Valley Business Bank, both of Visalia, California. | Newspaper:07/20/2006Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:              | 07/20/2006   
|Federal Register:       | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Isaac H. Jones, *Respondent, v.*Oliver J. Jones and others, *Appellant*s.

Appeal withdrawn.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 14, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0645 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM052AD

737 -53A1214, R3 --- 1/19/11 737 -53A1214, R2 --- 5/24/01 737 -53A1214, R1 --- 6/22/00 737 -53A1214 --- 6/17/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have

no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the

basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on

the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that

Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-30346

Summary Calendar

ANITA GUILLORY, on behalf of Chastity Guillory

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(93-CV-1419)

(October 16, 1995)

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied Appellant Guillory’s

claim on behalf of her minor daughter for supplemental security

income benefits. Upon review, the district court granted summary

judgment in favor of the Commissioner. Guillory appeals. We

affirm.

Appellant argues that the ALJ and the district court applied
2

the incorrect legal standard and that their decision is not

supported by substantial evidence. Our careful review of the

record convinces that Appellant errs in both respects.

The legal standard for determining whether a child is disabled

requires a determination whether the child: 1) was engaged in

substantial gainful activity, 2) had a severe impairment, 3) had an

impairment that met or equaled an impairment listed in appendix 1

of 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, and 4) had an impairment of comparable

severity to an impairment that would disable an adult. Sec.

416.924(b). At the fourth step, an Individualized Functional

Assessment is performed to determine whether the child’s impairment

limits her ability to physically or mentally function in an ageappropriate manner. Sec. 416.924(f). The ALJ carried out these

steps with precision. He found the child was never employed, had

a severe impairment, did not meet the conditions of Secs. 112.05 or

112.11 or equivalent, made an individualized assessment of her

ability to function in the five specified domains and concluded

that she experienced a more than moderate impairment only in the

cognitive function area and thus was not disabled. The proper

legal standard was applied.

Evidence is sufficient to support this finding if it is

substantial, that is more than a scintilla. Anderson v. Sullivan,

887 F.2d 630, 633 (5th Cir. 1989). Our review of the record

demonstrates more than ample evidence.

AFFIRMED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending July 24, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST CMNTY BK, GLASGOW, MONTANA | 642857 | 02/01/2010 | 07/16/2010     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-1586.

#### State v. Murphy.

Franklin C.P. No. 97CR052877. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motions to supplement the record and to stay the briefing schedule,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions to supplement the record and to stay the briefing schedule be, and hereby are, denied.

Resnick, J., would order the video to be transcribed and deny the continuance.

Pfeifer, J., would grant the motion to supplement the record and deny the continuance.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending March 21, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                 | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|PRESIDIO BK, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA | 3398100 | 11/10/2008 | 03/03/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us