- 667 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Kenneth Greer, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed July 2, 2021. No. S-20-639.

1. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. A jurisdictional question which does 

not involve a factual dispute is determined by an appellate court as a 

matter of law.

2. Sentences: Judges: Appeal and Error: Words and Phrases. A sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal 

in the absence of an abuse of discretion by the trial court. A judicial 

abuse of discretion exists only when the reasons or rulings of a trial 

judge are clearly untenable, unfairly depriving a litigant of a substantial 

right and denying a just result in matters submitted for disposition.

3. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. It is the power and duty of an appellate court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the matter before 

it, irrespective of whether the issue is raised by the parties.

4. ____: ____. An appeal is deemed perfected and the appellate court shall 

have jurisdiction of the cause when such notice of appeal has been filed 

and the required docket fee has been deposited in the office of the clerk 

of the district court.

5. Jurisdiction: Affidavits: Fees: Appeal and Error. In lieu of depositing the required docket fee, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2306 (Reissue 2016) 

allows a criminal defendant to request to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal, and, in this situation, a poverty affidavit serves as a substitute 

for the docket fee otherwise required upon appeal.

6. Jurisdiction: Affidavits: Appeal and Error. An in forma pauperis 

appeal is perfected when the appellant timely files a notice of appeal and 

a proper affidavit of poverty.

7. Sentences: Appeal and Error. When sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged on appeal to be excessive, the appellate court must 

determine whether the sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and any applicable legal principles.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

08/27/2021 08:09 AM CDT
- 668 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

8. Sentences. When imposing a sentence, a sentencing judge should consider the defendant’s (1) age, (2) mentality, (3) education and experience, (4) social and cultural background, (5) past criminal record or 

record of law-abiding conduct, and (6) motivation for the offense, as 

well as (7) the nature of the offense, and (8) the amount of violence 

involved in the commission of the crime.

9. ____. The sentencing court is not limited to any mathematically applied 

set of factors, but the appropriateness of the sentence is necessarily a 

subjective judgment that includes the sentencing judge’s observations 

of the defendant’s demeanor and attitude and all the facts and circumstances surrounding the defendant’s life.

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: 

Kimberly Miller Pankonin, Judge. Affirmed.

Thomas C. Riley, Douglas County Public Defender, and 

April M. Lucas for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph 

for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Freudenberg, J.

NATURE OF CASE

In an appeal from a second degree assault conviction, a 

question of appellate court jurisdiction arose with regard to 

the defendant’s second attempt to appeal after he dismissed 

his first attempt due to his failure to properly perfect it. In his 

appeal, the defendant challenges the district court’s sentence 

of 19 to 20 years’ imprisonment as excessive, asserting that 

the district court abused its discretion by failing to adequately 

consider all mitigating factors.

BACKGROUND

Plea and Conviction

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kenneth Greer pled no contest to second degree assault, a Class IIA felony, and the State 
- 669 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

dismissed the charge of driving under the influence (DUI) 

causing serious bodily injury, a Class IIIA felony. The State’s 

factual basis alleged that on November 6, 2019, Greer caused 

a collision and fled the scene at a high rate of speed. Greer 

struck another vehicle approximately two blocks away and then 

continued through a stop sign at a controlled intersection where 

he struck the rear of a van.

One of the passengers of the van was a 6-year-old girl who 

sustained traumatic head and spinal injuries. She was hospitalized and remained unresponsive for a period of time. In 

January 2020, the girl was admitted to a rehabilitation center, 

and at the time of the sentencing hearing on August 6, she 

remained partially paralyzed.

Based on the data from the airbag control module in Greer’s 

vehicle, he was traveling 67 miles per hour at the time of 

impact, which occurred in a 25-mile-per-hour speed zone. 

When officers arrived, Greer smelled of alcohol, had slurred 

speech, and failed a preliminary breath test. Pursuant to a 

search warrant, a blood draw was performed, and Greer’s 

blood alcohol content was .311 of a gram of alcohol per 100 

milliliters of his blood. After accepting Greer’s no contest plea, 

the court ordered that a presentence report (PSR) be prepared 

and continued the matter for sentencing.

Sentence

At the sentencing hearing, Greer’s counsel asked the court 

to fashion a sentence that took into consideration Greer’s age 

of 51 years; his medical condition of cirrhosis of the liver; his 

expression of remorse; his 11th grade education; and, while he 

denies it, his mental learning deficit.

Counsel acknowledged that this was Greer’s third DUI, 

but pointed out his prior convictions were not recent and 

the death of Greer’s brother played a role in his alcohol use. 

Defense counsel further stated that Greer took the plea without 

hesitation, taking responsibility for what he did. When Greer 

was asked if he wanted to say anything, he stated, “Yes. I’m 
- 670 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

very, very, sorry for the accident and for everything that I 

caused. But I apologize for that.”

The PSR sets forth the serious injuries suffered by the victim and indicates that the family continues to experience posttraumatic stress disorder. The mother of the injured child had to 

quit her job to care for her child, who is now a paraplegic and 

has already incurred $850,000 in ongoing medical expenses. 

Greer’s criminal history included two prior DUI convictions, 

a felony possession of cocaine conviction, and multiple traffic 

infractions. Greer’s criminal history also indicated that he did 

not satisfactorily complete probation two of the three times it 

had been granted to him. It was also noted that Greer’s driving privileges had been listed as revoked by the Department of 

Motor Vehicles since 2004, as a result of his second DUI.

Greer denied ever being diagnosed with a learning disability, but admitted that he was required to participate in special 

education programming at times and continues to experience 

educational difficulties. Greer reported that during his senior 

year of high school, he chose to drop out so he could work to 

financially help his mother because she was on her own raising him and his siblings. Greer reported that he had not held 

a regular job since 2005, when he ended his 16-year janitorial 

career at a university, and that he has survived on money he 

has earned by performing “odd jobs” for cash.

Greer reported having his first drink of alcohol at the age 

of 16 and described himself as a social level drinker with no 

“lifetime alcohol induced blackouts.” Despite his history of 

DUI arrests, Greer denied ever feeling he had problems with 

alcohol and stated he had decreased his drinking levels to 

two to three beers once per month. The PSR noted Greer’s 

reported blood alcohol content was .311 and that he told the 

accident investigator that he “blacked out” after consuming 

just two beers.

The PSR concluded that rehabilitative services of probation 

appear to be inappropriate due to Greer’s past performance 
- 671 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

on probation and to the fact that he is at a very high risk to 

reoffend. Greer showed a great deal of denial and minimization regarding the actual negative effect that alcohol has placed 

in his life and exhibited very little remorse for the injuries 

and financial stress he has caused. Ultimately, the PSR recommended that Greer’s case “be handled with a straight sentence 

of incarceration.”

At the sentencing hearing on August 6, 2020, the district 

court noted Greer’s prior criminal history and the probation 

officer’s perception that Greer showed no remorse. The court 

then set forth the long-term, life-altering effects on the minor 

victim and her family resulting from the choice Greer made to 

drink and drive. The court sentenced Greer to 19 to 20 years’ 

imprisonment, which sentence was memorialized in its order 

file stamped on August 7, 2020.

Multiple Appeals

Greer first filed a notice of appeal on August 24, 2020, 

along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis and an 

affidavit in support of the application. This appeal was docketed as case No. A-20-606. The notary stamp on the affidavit 

indicated that the notary’s commission had expired. On August 

28, the Nebraska Court of Appeals filed an order to show 

cause, ordering Greer to “provide . . . an affidavit attesting 

that the purported notary was a duly qualified notary public in 

the State of Nebraska at the time of the signing of [his] poverty affidavit.”

On September 2, 2020, Greer, along with the State, filed 

a stipulation to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, the Court of 

Appeals issued a mandate dated September 3, 2020, ordering 

the appeal be dismissed. The order on the mandate was filed 

September 11.

Meanwhile, Greer filed a second notice of appeal with the 

application to proceed in forma pauperis and a valid affidavit in support of the application on September 3, 2020. This 

appeal was docketed as case No. A-20-639.
- 672 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR

Greer assigns that the district court abused its discretion by 

imposing an excessive sentence because the district court failed 

to adequately consider mitigating factors.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

[1] A jurisdictional question which does not involve a factual dispute is determined by an appellate court as a matter 

of law. 1

[2] A sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not 

be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion 

by the trial court. 2 A judicial abuse of discretion exists only 

when the reasons or rulings of a trial judge are clearly untenable, unfairly depriving a litigant of a substantial right and 

denying a just result in matters submitted for disposition. 3

ANALYSIS

Jurisdiction

[3] It is the power and duty of an appellate court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the matter before it, irrespective of whether the issue is raised by the parties. 4 Citing 

L. J. Vontz Constr. Co. v. City of Alliance 5 and In re Estate of 

Marsh,

 6 the Court of Appeals requested that the parties brief 

the issue of whether the prior dismissal of case No. A-20-606—

without addressing its merits—acted as an affirmance of the 

judgment, which operated as res judicata in relation to the 

appeal in case No. A-20-639. Both parties believe this court 

has jurisdiction over this refiled appeal. We agree.

1 Porter v. Porter, ante p. 167, 959 N.W.2d 235 (2021).

2 State v. Gray, 307 Neb. 418, 949 N.W.2d 320 (2020).

3 Id.

4 Porter, supra note 1.

5 L. J. Vontz Constr. Co. v. City of Alliance, 243 Neb. 334, 500 N.W.2d 173 

(1993).

6 In re Estate of Marsh, 145 Neb. 559, 17 N.W.2d 471 (1945).
- 673 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

[4-6] Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1912 (Cum. Supp. 2020) governs appellate jurisdiction and sets out the requirements for an 

appeal to be perfected in the appellate court. Section 25-1912 

requires that a notice of appeal must be filed and the required 

docket fee deposited in the office of the clerk of the district in 

which a judgment and sentence upon conviction was rendered 

within 30 days after the entry of such judgment. An appeal is 

deemed perfected and the appellate court shall have jurisdiction of the cause when such notice of appeal has been filed and 

the required docket fee has been deposited in the office of the 

clerk of the district court. 7 In lieu of depositing the required 

docket fee, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2306 (Reissue 2016) allows 

a criminal defendant to request to proceed in forma pauperis 

on appeal, and, in this situation, a poverty affidavit serves 

as a substitute for the docket fee otherwise required upon 

appeal. 8 An in forma pauperis appeal is perfected when the 

appellant timely files a notice of appeal and a proper affidavit 

of poverty. 9

L. J. Vontz Constr. Co. and In re Estate of Marsh both 

state the general rule that the dismissal of an appeal from an 

appellate court without an examination of the case upon its 

merits operates as an affirmance of the judgment appealed 

or attempted to be appealed from. 10 But both of these cases 

are factually distinguishable from this matter. In both cases, 

the dismissed appeals were properly perfected prior to their 

dismissals. Here, Greer failed to perfect his first attempt to 

appeal due to an expired notary stamp on the affidavit accompanying Greer’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Therefore, in this case, appellate court jurisdiction had never 

been established.

7 State v. Melton, 308 Neb. 159, 953 N.W.2d 246 (2021). See § 25-1912(4).

8 Melton, supra note 7.

9 Id.

10 L. J. Vontz Constr. Co., supra note 5; In re Estate of Marsh, supra note 6.
- 674 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

Despite the absence of a properly perfected appeal, the parties stipulated that the appeal would be dismissed. Greer then 

properly perfected his second attempt to appeal within the 

30-day filing limitation established by § 25-1912.

Since Greer did not perfect his first appeal attempt, appellate 

jurisdiction was never established to allow the determination 

of any question relative to Greer’s appeal and nothing was 

presented for review. 11 For that reason, Greer’s first appeal 

was a procedural and legal nullity. As we have often stated in 

other contexts, “‘[n]othing comes from nothing.’” 12 Therefore, 

appellate jurisdiction was established when Greer properly perfected his second attempt to appeal.

Excessive Sentence

Greer alleges that the sentence of 19 to 20 years’ imprisonment imposed for his second degree assault conviction was 

excessive because the district court did not seriously or adequately consider all of the mitigating sentencing factors, specifically Greer’s age, education and experience, mentality, 

criminal history, and the circumstances of the offense. Greer 

argues that the district court did not tailor his sentences to fit 

him as the offender, but instead imposed the sentence to fit 

the crime.

[7] Greer’s conviction for second degree assault, a Class IIA 

felony, is punishable by no minimum and a maximum of 20 

years’ imprisonment. 13 When sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged on appeal to be excessive, the appellate 

court must determine whether the sentencing court abused 

its discretion in considering well-established factors and any 

applicable legal principles. 14

11 See State v. Miller, 240 Neb. 297, 481 N.W.2d 580 (1992).

12 Id. at 299, 481 N.W.2d at 581.

13 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (Cum. Supp. 2020).

14 Gray, supra note 2.
- 675 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

[8,9] When imposing a sentence, a sentencing judge should 

consider the defendant’s (1) age, (2) mentality, (3) education 

and experience, (4) social and cultural background, (5) past 

criminal record or record of law-abiding conduct, and (6) motivation for the offense, as well as (7) the nature of the offense, 

and (8) the amount of violence involved in the commission of 

the crime. 15 The sentencing court is not limited to any mathematically applied set of factors, but the appropriateness of the 

sentence is necessarily a subjective judgment that includes the 

sentencing judge’s observations of the defendant’s demeanor 

and attitude and all the facts and circumstances surrounding the 

defendant’s life. 16

We review the sentence imposed for an abuse of discretion. 17

A judicial abuse of discretion exists only when the reasons or 

rulings of a trial judge are clearly untenable, unfairly depriving 

a litigant of a substantial right and denying a just result in matters submitted for disposition. 18

Greer was 51 years old at the time of sentencing and had 

two prior DUI convictions. He had a poor history of performance while on probation and was operating his motor vehicle 

in violation of a court’s license revocation order at the time of 

the offense. Greer was driving with a blood alcohol content of 

.311 of a gram of alcohol per 100 milliliters of his blood and 

acknowledged to the probation officer that he was aware that 

he should not have been driving. Finally, while Greer perhaps 

showed some remorse for his actions, such remorse does not 

counteract the lifelong effects of Greer’s choice to drink and 

drive on his victim and her family.

The district court recognized the appropriate factors when 

imposing Greer’s sentence. The district court stated on the 

15 Id.

16 Id.

17 Id.

18 Id.
- 676 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. GREER

Cite as 309 Neb. 667

record that it considered the PSR, which included information 

for all of the factors to be considered by a sentencing court. 

Though it may be good practice for district courts to provide 

a record of their reasoning, we do not require the sentencing 

court to articulate on the record that it has considered each 

sentencing factor nor to make specific findings as to the facts 

pertaining to the factors or the weight given them. 19

Greer also argues that the sentence imposed fits only 

the crime and not the offender. We disagree. The sentence 

imposed properly reflected the seriousness of the crime committed, the long-lasting effect on the victim and her family, and 

Greer’s prior criminal record and performance on probation. 

Considering the totality of the circumstances, we cannot say 

that the district court’s sentence was untenable. We find the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a sentence of 19 to 20 years’ imprisonment in this matter.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s judgment is 

affirmed.

Affirmed.

19 See State v. McCulley, 305 Neb. 139, 939 N.W.2d 373 (2020).