alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6

                       Agreement to Extend Expiration Date

This agreement is entered into for the sole purpose of extending the expiration
date as outlined in Paragraph 3 of the Option Agreements entered into by Green
Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. as Optionee and Alberta A. Bryan by Duane Hilger,
Power-of-Attorney, Optionor.

This agreement covers two option agreements - one signed November 12, 2004,
covering 22 acres in Section 25, Township 69 North, Range 40 West of the 5th
P.M., and an option agreement dated October 20, 2004, covering 66.6 acres
located in Section 25, Township 690 North, Range 40 West of the 5th P.M., both
in Fremont County, Iowa.

By agreement of both the optionor and the optionee, and in consideration of
$10.00, the expiration date is changed to read "November 30, 2005."

All other terms of the original option agreement remain in effect and in force.

Optionee:                                   Optionor:


/s/ Gary Thien                              /s/ Alberta A. Bryan by Duane Hilger
---------------------------                 ------------------------------------
Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc.         Alberta A. Bryan
By Gary Thien, Vice-president               By Duane Hilger, Power-of-Attorney
1-12-05                                     1-17-05
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1577 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1577

             For the relief of the estate of Irwin Rutman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 1995

 Ms. Molinari introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of the estate of Irwin Rutman.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DESIGNATION.

    For purposes of part L of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796 et seq.), relating to benefits 
for survivors of public safety officers, Irwin Rutman of Staten Island, 
New York, shall be deemed to have been a public safety officer on 
October 29, 1990, and his family shall be entitled to death benefits 
under such part.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made under section 1 
may be paid to or received by any attorney or agent for services 
rendered in connection with the payment. Any person who violates the 
provisions of this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall 
be subject to a fine in the amount provided under title 18, United 
States Code.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of section 1 shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 20, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 5621 North Classen Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. | Newspaper:06/24/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 06/24/2009    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending February 28, 2009

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|QUALITY BANKSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Gary and Mary Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, Wade and Marilyn Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, Keith and Brenda Ihry, Hope, North Dakota, and Reed Ihry, Devils Lake, North Dakota, as a group acting in concert, to acquire control of Quality Bankshares, Inc., Fingal, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of Quality Bank, Fingal, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/16/2009
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | 03/16/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                      | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST PREMIER BK, SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA | 374653 | 10/29/2007 | 02/06/2009     | S         | Int Sm Bank
|VALLEY BK OF HELENA, HELENA, MONTANA        | 648055 | 10/27/2008 | 02/18/2009     | O         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



Exhibit 21


SUBSIDIARIES




| |   |                                                           
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Audio Innovations, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation          
|
| |  | MB Quart Shanghai, Inc., an Arizona corporation           
|
| |  | Rockford (Europe) Elektronik Vertriebs GmbH, a German GmbH
|
| |  | Rockford Foreign Sales Corporation, a Barbados corporation
|
| |  | Rockford Sales.Com, Inc., an Arizona corporation          
|
| |  | Rockford Singapore Corporation, an Arizona corporation
§ 177.800 General requirements. ( a ) All passenger accommodations must be arranged and equipped to provide for the safety of the passengers in consideration of the route, modes of operation, and speed of the vessel.
( b ) The height of ceilings in a passenger accommodation space, including aisles and passageways, must be at least 1,880 millimeters (74 inches), but may be reduced at the sides of a space to allow the camber, wiring, ventilation ducts, and piping.
( c ) A passenger accommodation space must be maintained to minimize fire and safety hazards and to preserve sanitary conditions. Aisles must be kept clear of obstructions.
( d ) A passenger accommodation space must not contain: ( 1 ) Electrical generation equipment or transformers, high temperature parts, pipelines, rotating assemblies, or any other item that could injure a passenger, unless such an item is adequately shielded or isolated; and
( 2 ) A control for operating the vessel, unless the control is so protected and located that operation of the vessel by a crew member will not be impeded by a passenger during normal or emergency operations.
( e ) The deck above a passenger accommodation space must be located above the deepest load waterline.
( f ) A variation from a requirement of this subpart may be authorized by the cognizant OCMI for an unusual arrangement or design provided there is no significant reduction of space, accessibility, safety, or sanitation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1395
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               64
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    16
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (10)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (10)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation



### Mr: John 

### B. Troost 3650 Fairland Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90043 Dear Mr. Troost: GENERAL COUNSEL April 27, 2015 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Thank you for your letter to Secretary Foxxregarding Access Services' petition for rulemaking to amend the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Americans with Disabilities Actregulations concerning the calculation ofparatransit fees. The Secretary has asked meto respond onhis behalf. The Department is committed to ensuring nondiscriminatory access to transportation for individuals with disabilities. Paratransit service, like thatprovided by Access Services, is essential to connectpeople withtheir communities, so the Department works hardto ensure that both users ofthe system and companies providing services are treated fairly under our regulations. We are currentlyreviewing and processing Access Services' petition for rulemaking in accordance with the Department's regulations onpetitions for rulemaking (49 C.F.R. 

### § 5.11- 5.13). For your reference, your letter and my response have beenplaced inDocketNo. DOTOST 

### -2015-0075, which has been created for all information relating to this matter. I hope this information is helpful to you. Sincerely,

Kathryn 

### B. Thomson
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Interlink Electronics, Inc. 

Camarillo, California 

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-112034) and Form S-8 (Nos. 033-93066, 333-39371, 333-53870, 333-107174, 333-117831 and 333-127763) of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our reports dated April 5, 2007, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively account for the Branded and OEM businesses as discontinued operations as described in Note 3 (the 2006 and 2005 financial statementsbefore the effects of the adjustments described in Note 3 are not presented separately herein), which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report dated April 5,2007 also contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

Signed BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

April 5, 2007
§ 68.100 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) This subpart contains requirements for the documentation of U.S.-built vessels in the coastwise trade that were granted special rights under the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Action of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-293).
( b ) This subpart applies to— ( 1 ) A vessel under a demise charter that was eligible for, and received, a document with a coastwise endorsement under § 67.19 of this chapter and 46 U.S.C. 12106(e) before August 9, 2004;
( 2 ) A barge deemed eligible under 46 U.S.C. 12106(e) and 12110(b) to operate in coastwise trade without being documented before August 9, 2004; and
( 3 ) A replacement vessel of a similar size and function for any vessel under paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this section.
( c ) Except for vessels under paragraph (d) of this section, this subpart applies to a certificate of documentation, or renewal of one, endorsed with a coastwise endorsement for a vessel under 46 U.S.C. 12106(e) or a replacement vessel of a similar size and function that was issued before August 9, 2004, as long as the vessel is owned by the person named in the certificate, or by a subsidiary or affiliate of that person, and the controlling interest in the owner has not been transferred to a person that was not an affiliate of the owner as of August 9, 2004.
( d ) With respect to offshore supply vessels with a certificate of documentation endorsed with a coastwise endorsement as of August 9, 2004, this subpart applies until August 9, 2007. On and after August 9, 2007, subpart C of this part applies to these vessels.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1583

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum

wage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 1995

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase

the minimum wage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor

5 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended

6 to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec8 tion, not less than $4.75 an hour;’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the 3rd
2

•HR 1583 IH

1 month beginning after the date of the enactment of this

2 Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,523
<SECURITIES>                                     2,899
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,577
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         951,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                 209,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 918,605  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        768,272  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                      6,102 
<COMMON>                                           133 
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,037 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   918,605 
<SALES>                                         28,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,491
<CGS>                                           24,839 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,193 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,805)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.24)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1533 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for 
                    escaping from a Federal prison.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for 
                    escaping from a Federal prison.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 751(a) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ``five'' and 
inserting ``10''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Cuyahoga County Bar Association *v.*Petrancek.

[Cite as *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Petrancek*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 153.]

(No. 98-759

Submitted June 10, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*154
      *Lenore Kleinman*and *Howard A. Schulman,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. On occasions where there has been prior discipline, disbarment is appropriate when the lawyer knowingly violates the terms of the prior disciplinary order and that violation causes actual or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession. We adopt the panel’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Albany Atlanta Brussels Denver 

# McKenna Long &:

# AldridgeLLP
1676 International Drive • Penthouse Mclean, VA 22102 Northern Virginia Orange County Rancho Santa Fe San Diego Los Angeles Tel: 703.336
.8800 mckennalong.com San Francisco Miami Seoul New York Washington, DC MARK E. MCKINNON 703.336.8708 EMAIL ADDRESS mmckinnon@mckennalong

.com

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 April24, 2015

Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemption 11156 Issued to Total Safety US, Inc. Pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA-2014-0610) Dear Gentlemen: Total Safety US, Inc. ("Total Safety") was issued Exemption No. 11156 on January 29, 2015 (hereinafter "the Exemption"), allowing commercial operation of UAS to conduct flare stack inspections for the oil, natural gas, petro-chemical, and pipeline industries. Total Safety requests that the FAA grant an amendment to this exemption to permit the broad collection of aerial data
. At the time the Exemption was granted, the FAA had a policy oflimiting flights of UAS to specific use cases. For Total Safety, the operative language limits flight to flare stackinspections. Shortly afterthe Exemptionwas granted, the FAA changedits policy and nowgrantsbroader authorityto exemptionholders to engagein "aerial data collection." See,

**~Exemption** 11241 issuedto Phoenix Air UNMANNED. Total Safety requests that the instant Petition for Amendment be granted and that the paragraph entitled "The FAA's Decision" on page 17 be revised to simply refer to "aerial data collection." Total Safety further requests that the language in the paragraph limiting flights to specific use cases be removed. Similarly, Total Safetyrequests that all references to limiting flights to flare stack inspections inthe introductory paragraph ofthe Exemption be removed. Total Safety will use this broadened authority to engage in general aerial data collection in furtherance ofits business activities and will provide a wide range ofservicesApril24, 2015 Page2 including industrial and energyinfrastructure inspection, aerial surveying, marketing, incident response and remediation, and other related purposes. These services will be provided in accordance with all of the conditions and limitations set forth in the Exemption. Total Safety does not seek any modification or alteration ofthe procedures and practices found acceptable by the FAA in the Exemption. For the same reasons, good cause exists to waive the requirement that this Petition for Amendmentbepublishedinthe FederalRegister. Finally, Total Safetybelievesthat granting this Petition for Amendmentis inthe public interestbecause itharmonizes the scope ofTotal Safety's UAS activities with current FAA policy. Ifyou have any questions orneed any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours,
ark E. McKinnon Counsel for Total Safety US, Inc.