Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      Independence Institute v. FEC (District court)

FEC Record: Litigation*Independence Institute v. FEC* (District court)October 8, 2014 On October 6, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a suit brought by the Independence Institute that challenged the statutory provisions governing electioneering communications. The plaintiff claimed the definition of electioneering
    communication is overbroad and the associated disclosure requirements are unconstitutionally burdensome. The court found the plaintiff’s claims to be clearly foreclosed by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in *Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission*,
    and ordered that judgment be entered for the Commission and dismissed the case. **Background**
     On September 2, 2014, the Independence Institute, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization in Colorado, asked for a three-judge court to hear its challenge to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act’s (BCRA) regulation of electioneering communications. BCRA
    defines an “electioneering communication” as any broadcast, cable or satellite communication that refers to a clearly identified federal candidate, is made within 30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general, special or runoff election, and
    is targeted to the relevant electorate. 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(3)(A)(i) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §434(f)(3)(A)(i)). The statute also requires certain disclosures concerning the sources and financing of electioneering communications. 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(1),
    (2)(A) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §434(f)(1), (2)(A)). Under the Commission’s regulations, when a corporation makes disbursements for an electioneering communication aggregating more than $10,000 per year, it must file a report with the Commission, which
    includes disclosure of the names and addresses of all contributors who contributed more than $1,000 to the corporation for the purpose of furthering electioneering communications. 11 CFR 104.20(c)(9). In its suit, the Independence Institute said it planned to run a 60-second radio ad within 60 days of the general election that would mention a federal candidate. While the group planned to raise funds specifically for this advertisement, it did not wish
    to disclose its donors. The plaintiff asked the court to declare BCRA’s definition of electioneering communication (52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(3)(A)(i)) and associated reporting requirements at 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(1)-(2) overbroad as applied to its proposed advertisements. **Court Decision**
     In the interest of expediting the case, both parties agreed that the court would consider plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction as a motion for summary judgment and accordingly issue a final decision on the merits of the case in deciding
    that motion. The court found the plaintiff’s case to be foreclosed by clear Supreme Court precedent, principally by *Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission*. The court denied the plaintiff’s requests for a three-judge court and a preliminary
    injunction, ordered that judgment be entered for the Commission, and dismissed the case in its entirety. In its 2010 *Citizens United* decision, the Supreme Court invalidated the prohibition on corporate and union expenditures, but upheld BCRA’s disclosure requirements for electioneering communications. The Independence Institute claimed the disclosure
    requirements are overbroad as applied to its proposed radio ad because the advertisement is genuine issue advocacy as opposed to express advocacy or its functional equivalent. The district court explained that the *Citizens United* decision
    rejected the notion that disclosure requirements must be limited to express advocacy or its functional equivalent, and concluded that that holding encompasses the facts in this case. The Independence Institute also tried to distinguish its ad from an ad at issue in *Citizens United*, which had a pejorative tone when speaking about a federal candidate. The court found this argument unconvincing, stating that the decision in
    *Citizens United* does not suggest that the pejorative nature of Citizens United’s advertisement was in any way important to the Supreme Court’s conclusion regarding the constitutionality of the disclosure requirements. On October 8, 2014, the Independence Institute filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia: Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK **Resources:** *Independence Institute v. FEC* litigation page
    Memorandum opinion of district dourt [PDF]
 Author
          Isaac BakerCommunications Specialist


Read next: Updated list of federal PAC acronyms and abbreviations
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms