P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40957 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee v. J OS E GUA DA L UP E M AC HADO

- S AR M I ENT O , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 7: 07- C R - 981- 2 B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * J ose G u a d a l u p e M a ch a d o-S a rm i en to (M a ch a d o) ap p ea l s th e 8 0 -m on th sentence he receivedf ol l ow i n g h i s c on vi ct i on by ju ryof conspi racy t o i m port m o r e t han 50 kil o gr am s o f m ar ij uana , i n vi o l at i o n o f 21 U . S. C. § 9 63 , i m po r t i ng m o re th a n 5 0 k il o g ra m s o f m a riju a n a , inv io la tion of 2 1 U .S .C . § 9 5 2 (a), conspir acy t o possess w i t h t h e i n t en tt o di st ribu t e m ore th an 50 k i l ogram s of m a rij u a n a , i n viol a ti on of 2 1 U . S . C . § 84 6 , an dpo sse s s io n w i ththe i n ten t t o United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D November

2, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 40957

2 d i s t r ib u t e mo r e t h a n 5 0 k i l o g r a ms o f ma r ij u a n a , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 2 1 U. S . C. § 8 4 1 (a ). F o rt h e f

ir s t tim e o n a p p e a l, h e a r g u e s th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t e r r e din as se ss i ng an aggr avat i ng- r ol e e nhan c em entand thatthe s ent enc e i m pos ed w as u n reasona bl e. M ac hado di d notrec eive an aggr avat i ng- r ol e enhancem ent . Acc or di ngl y, h is cla im th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r te r r e dina s s e s s in gs u c h a n e n h a n c e m e n t is fa c tu a llyfr iv o lo u s . M a c h a d o ’ s n e w lyra is e dc h a lle n g e t o th e re a s o n a b le n e s s o f h is s e n te n c e is r e v ie w e d fo rp la in e r r o ro n ly . S e eUn ite dS ta te sv . Pe ltie r, 505 F. 3d 389, 391- 92 ( 5t h C i r . 2007) , ce r t. d e n ie d, 128 S . C t . 295 9 ( 200 8) . To d em on st rat e pl ai n err or, M a c h a d o m u s t s h o w afo r fe ite d e r r o r th a t is cle a ro ro b v io u s a n dth a t a ffe c ts h is s u b s ta n tia l rig h ts . P u cket tv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 129 S. Ct . 1 42 3, 1 42 9 ( 20 09 ) . I f he m a k e s s u c h a s h o w in g , th is co u r t h a s th e d is c r e tio n to co r r e c t t h e e r r o rb u t o n ly if its er i ous ly af

fec t s t he fai r nes s, i nt egr i t y, orpubl i cr eput at i on o f j udi c i al p r o c e e d in g s . I

d. M ach ad o ha s no tde m o ns t r at e d a ny e r r o r , pl ai n o ro t he r w i s e . Con t r ary t o hi s asser t i on , t h e sentenci n g t ran scri pt r ef l ect s th at th e di st ri ctcourt con sider edthe 18 U . S . C . § 35 5 3 (a) factors a n dpr ov i d edan ex p l a n a ti on f or it s s e n te n c e . M o r e o v e r , b e c a u s e th e co u r t im p o s e ds e n te n c e w ith in th e co r r e c tly c al c ul ated g u i de l i ne s r ang e , t hi s c o ur tw i l li nfe rpr o pe rc o ns i de r at i o n o f t he § 3 5 5 3 (a ) fa c to r s . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. Mares , 4 0 2 F .3d5 1 1 , 5 1 9 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 5 ). A dd i t i on al ly, t h e w i t h i n - gu i del i n es s en t en ce i m posedi s presum ed reason able. S ee Un i t ed Stat es v. A lon zo , 4 35 F . 3d5 51, 554 ( 5th C i r. 200 6) . M ach ad o’ s new cl ai m s th at th e sentence i s “ grossly di sproporti on ate t o [h i s] condu ct” an d “not ref l ect ive of

sentences f

or oth er defe n da n t s enga gedi n si m i l ar condu ct” are w ho l ly c o nc l us i o nal . To t he e xt e ntt hathi s argu m e nt s a r e b as e d o n t he erroneou s asser t i on t h at he rec eivedan aggrav ati n g- rol e en h an cem en t , t h ey a r g u m e n ts a r e fa c tu a llyfla w e da n dw ith o u t m e r it.N o. 08- 40957

3 T h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s j u dg m en ti s A F F IR M E D . Th e G overnm en t ’ s m ot i on for su m m a ryaff

i rm a n ce is D E N IE D as m oo t.