alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

               List of Mutual Risk Management Ltd. Subsidiaries

             Subsidiary                                 Jurisdiction of 
                                                         Organization

Commonwealth Risk Services (Europe) Limited              United Kingdom

Commonwealth Risk Services (West) Ltd.                     California

Commonwealth Risk Services, Inc.                          Pennsylvania

CFM Insurance Managers Ltd                                  Bermuda

Hamilton Management Ltd.                                   Wisconsin

IPC Group of America, Ltd.                                Pennsylvania

Legion Finance Corporation                                  Missouri

Legion Insurance Company                                  Pennsylvania

Legion Management Corporation                               Oklahoma

MRM Hancock Limited                                      United Kingdom

Mutual Coyle Hamilton Managers Limited                      Ireland

Mutual Finance Ltd.                                         Bermuda

Mutual Group Ltd.                                           Delaware

Mutual Holdings (U.S.) Ltd.                                 Delaware

Mutual Holdings Ltd.                                        Bermuda

Mutual Indemnity (Barbados) Ltd.                            Barbados

Mutual Indemnity (Dublin) Ltd.                              Ireland

Mutual Indemnity (U.S.) Ltd.                                Bermuda

Mutual Indemnity Ltd.                                       Bermuda

Mutual Risk Management (Barbados) Ltd.                      Barbados

Mutual Risk Management (Cayman) Ltd.                         Cayman

Park International Limited                                  Bermuda

Professional Underwriters Corp                              Delaware

Legion Indemnity Company                                    Illinois

SBU Insurance Agency , Inc                                  Delaware

Hemisphere Management Limited                               Bermuda

MRMFinancialServices Limited                                Bermuda
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 30, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 35.40-18 Water spray systems—TB/ALL. ( a ) Water spray system apparatus shall be marked: “WATER SPRAY SYSTEM,” as appropriate, in not less than 2-inch red letters.
( b ) The control valve, and its control if located remotely, shall be distinctly marked to indicate the compartment protected.
#### § 195.06-1 Lifesaving appliances and arrangements.

All lifesaving appliances and arrangements shall be in accordance with the requirements for special purpose vessels in subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25312, May 20, 1996]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending August 9, 2008

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|NBRS FINANCIAL BANK | * Branch       | NBRS Financial Bank, Rising Sun, Maryland, proposes to establish a branch located at 20 Craigtown Road, Port Deposit, Maryland. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | Not available 
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable
|STELLARONE BANK     | * Branch       | StellarOne Bank, Christiansburg, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 4109 Plank Road, Fredericksburg, Virginia.         | Newspaper:08/22/2008Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:          | 08/22/2008    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ZACHARY TAYLOR, #597646,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 15-CV-12433-DT

RANDALL HAAS, ET AL.,

Defendants. / 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R Grand pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on December 30, 2015, the

magistrate judge recommended that this court grant the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #

23] , Dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and deny as moot MDOC’s Motion for

Summary Judgement [Dkt. # 17]. A consent to the voluntary dismissal was filed by the

MDOC Defendants on December 28, 2015. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28

U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1

Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this

Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

“Report and Recommendation”, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt.# 23] is GRANTED, the

complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. # 17] is DENIED AS MOOT.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to

independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

2:15-cv-12433-RHC-DRG Doc # 26 Filed 01/12/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 99
Dated: January 12, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or

pro se parties on this date, January 12, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2

2:15-cv-12433-RHC-DRG Doc # 26 Filed 01/12/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 100
# C_2012258EN.01000702.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus, Finland) — Execution of a European arrest warrant in respect of Melvin West

(Case C-192/12 PPU) (1)

1

(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant and surrender procedures between Member States - European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of execution of a custodial sentence - Article 28 - Subsequent surrender - ‘Chain’ of European arrest warrants - Execution of a third European arrest warrant in respect of the same person - Concept of ‘executing Member State’ - Consent to surrender - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure)

2012/C 258/11

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Melvin West

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Korkein oikeus — Interpretation of Article 28(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — Arrest warrant for the execution of a custodial sentence — Concept of ‘executing Member State’ in the case of subsequent surrender — National of Member State A surrendered by that Member State to Member State B for the execution of a term of imprisonment and then, after the end of that term, by Member State B to Member State C for the execution of a term of imprisonment in that State — Request by Member State D to Member State C, under an arrest warrant, for the person concerned to be surrendered to Member State D for the execution of a sentence of imprisonment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 28(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, where a person has been subject to more than one surrender between Member States pursuant to successive European arrest warrants, the subsequent surrender of that person to a Member State other than the Member State having last surrendered him is subject to the consent only of the Member State which carried out that last surrender.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
§ 502.70 Procedure for dispositive motions. ( a ) A dispositive motion as defined in § 502.69(g) of this subpart must include a concise statement of the legal basis of the motion with citation to legal authority and a statement of material facts with exhibits as appropriate.
( b ) A response to a dispositive motion must be served and filed within 15 days after the date of service of the motion. The response must include a concise statement of the legal basis of the response with citation to legal authority and specific responses to any statements of material facts with exhibits as appropriate.
( c ) A reply to the response to a dispositive motion may be filed within 7 days after the date of service of the response to the motion. A reply may not raise new grounds for relief or present matters that do not relate to the response and must not reargue points made in the opening motion.
( d ) The non-moving party may not file any further reply unless requested by the Commission or presiding officer, or upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
( e ) *Page limits.* Neither the motion nor the response may exceed 30 pages, excluding exhibits or appendices, without leave of the presiding officer. A reply may not exceed 15 pages. [Rule 70.]
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-111966, 333-81876, 333-103241 and 333-32225) of Digital Video
Systems, Inc. and the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file
Nos. 333-65598, 333-103243, and 333-39211) of Digital Video Systems, Inc. of our report dated March
29, 2004 relating to the December 31, 2003 and 2002 financial statements and financial statement
schedules included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP

Palo Alto, California
                   April 15, 2005

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending December 30, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 32.55-5 Ventilation of tank vessels constructed between November 10, 1936, and July 1, 1951—TB/ALL. ( a ) On tank vessels, the construction or conversion of which was started on or after November 10, 1936, and prior to July 1, 1951, all enclosed parts of the vessel, other than cargo, fuel, and water tanks and cofferdams, shall be provided with efficient means of ventilation.
( b ) Pumprooms and compartments containing machinery where sources of vapor ignition are normally present shall be ventilated in such a way as to remove vapors from points near the floor level or the bilges. Effective steam or air actuated gas ejectors or blowers or ventilators fitted with heads for natural ventilation, will be approved for this purpose. (See § 32.65-20 for other requirements concerning pumprooms.)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


           We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Transition Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-10411 and
File No. 333-10413) of our report dated November 15, 1996, on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of Transition Systems, Inc. as of September
30, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, and
September 24, 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.







Boston, Massachusetts                 COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
December 18, 1996
#### § 502.7 Documents in foreign languages.

Every document, exhibit, or other paper written in a language other than English and filed with the Commission or offered in evidence in any proceeding before the Commission under this part or in response to any rule or order of the Commission pursuant to this part, shall be filed or offered in the language in which it is written and shall be accompanied by an English translation thereof duly verified under oath to be an accurate translation. [Rule 7.]
#### Casendania Sanford and Livonia Smith, *Respondents, v.*Thurman D. Ellithorp and Pascal D. Ellithorp, *Appellants, Impleaded,*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Osborn, J.
#### § 201.24 Suspension or disbarment.

The Administration may, in its discretion, deny admission to, suspend, or disbar any person from practice before the Administration who it finds does not possess the requisite qualifications to represent others or is lacking in character, integrity, or to have engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct. Disrespectful, disorderly, or contumacious language or contemptuous conduct at any hearing before the Administration or a presiding officer shall constitute grounds for immediate exclusion from said hearing by the Presiding Officer. Any person who has been admitted to practice before the Administration may be disbarred from such practice only after he has been afforded an opportunity to be heard.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 12, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Group Management Corp
(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Lamar Sinkfield, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lamar Sinkfield
    ---------------------------
    Lamar Sinkfield
    Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2003
SUPREME COURT.

#### Sarah Brown agt. Joseph Cromien *et al.*

*Special Term,*

*October,*1875.

*District courts, New Tm'h—forcible entry and detainer.*

The district courts of the city of New York have no jurisdiction to entertain proceedings for forcible entry and detainer.

Van Vorst, *J.*

— The district courts have no jurisdiction to entertain proceedings for forcible entry and detainer.

Chapter 344 of the Laws of 1857 is an act to reduce the several acts relating to the district courts in the city of' New York into one act. Section 77 describes the duties of the justices of the district courts, and the authority they may exercise.

They are authorized to perform the duties and exercise all the powers and authority specified in certain provisions of the Revised Statutes, to which particular reference is made.

. Whilst they may exercise authority in respect to “ summary proceedings ” to secure the possession of land in- other cases, provided for in article 2, title 2, chapter 8 of the Revised Statutes, no authority is given with respect to proceedings under article 1, which relates to proceedings in respect to forcible entry and detainer.

When we consider the nature and scope of the act of 1857, and the details into which it enters with respect to these courts and the justices thereof, and their powers and duties, we must’ conclude that the omission in respect to proceedings for forcible entry and detainer was designed, and that the former laws on the subject were repealed.

*193For the exercise of power in respect to forcible entry and detainer would be inconsistent with the act of 1857, which professes to reorganize these courts and define their duties, as well as the powers of the justices thereof.

To the extent, therefore, of prohibiting the bringing of these proceedings before the justice in question, the prayer of the complaint should be granted.

But the other ruling asked for cannot well be granted, as the plaintiff is not remediless at law. ■ The summary proceedings may be reviewed by *dertiorari.*

To any new proceedings before another tribunal having jurisdiction the plaintiff may interpose any legal ground of resistance in his favor. The defendant Liddy is shown to be responsible, and the remedy which the plaintiff has invoked by action against him will secure her under the covenants in the law.

There should be judgment for the plaintiff to the extent above indicated.