alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp
Realty Fund III Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         637,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,382<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               940,019
<PP&E>                                      32,464,918<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                            (22,647,626)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,431,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          583,962
<BONDS>                                     18,621,037<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (7,773,709)<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,431,290
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,905,176<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,305,696<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             411,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,295<F8>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F8>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F8>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables grouped in "Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets"
on the Balance Sheet.
<F2>Includes apartment complexes of $31,945,334 and deferred expenses of $519,584.
<F3>Includes depreciation of $22,377,293 and amortization of deferred expenses
of $270,333.
<F4>Represents mortgage note payable.
<F5>Represents total deficit of the General Partners ($331,685) and the
Limited Partners ($7,442,024).
<F6>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F7>Includes operating expenses of $755,088, real estate taxes of $139,111
and depreciation and amortization of $411,497.
<F8>Net Income allocated $1,883 to General Partners and $186,412 to Limited
Partners.  Net Income of $7.16 per unit on 25,000 units outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | Actions under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending August 8, 2009

----

Bank Branches, DomesticAtlantaCentral State Bank, Calera, Alabama  -- to establish a branch at 71 Limestone Parkway, Calera.					-Approved, August 6, 2009 					DallasComerica Bank, Dallas, Texas  -- to establish branches at 2200 South Gilbert Road, Chandler, Arizona, and 1831 North Pebble Creek Parkway, Goodyear.					-Approved, August 4, 2009 					

Bank Holding CompaniesDallasA.N.B. Holding Company, Ltd., Terrell, Texas  -- to acquire additional shares of The ANB Corporation, Terrell, and indirectly acquire additional shares in its subsidiaries, The American National Bank; Lakeside Bancshares, Inc., Rockwall; and Lakeside National Bank.					-Approved, August 7, 2009 					New YorkHaven Bancorp, MHC, Hoboken, New Jersey, and Haven Bancorp, Inc.  -- to acquire Haven Savings Bank, Hoboken.					-Approved, August 7, 2009 					Kansas CityTri Valley Bancshares, Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska  -- to become a bank holding company and to acquire Tri-Valley Bank, Talmage.					-Withdrawn, August 7, 2009 					

Bank PremisesRichmondBenchmark Community Bank, Kenbridge, Virginia  -- to increase its investment in bank premises.					-Approved, August 6, 2009 					

Change In Bank ControlAtlantaHeritage First Bancshares, Inc., Rome, Georgia  -- change in bank control of Heritage First and its subsidiary banks, Heritage First Bank, Rome, and Heritage First Bank, Orange Beach, Alabama.					-Permitted, August 4, 2009 					San FranciscoState Bank Corp., Lake Havasu City, Arizona  -- to retain control of State Bank Corp. and its subsidiary bank, Mohave State Bank, Lake Havasu City.					-Permitted, August 6, 2009 					

International OperationsNew YorkBanco Popular de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico  -- to establish BP Sirenusa International, LLC as an agreement corporation.					-Withdrawn, August 6, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | Actions under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: August 13, 2009
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Roy T.K. Thung, certify that: 

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Independence Holding Company; 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

August 13, 2004 

/s/   Roy T. K. Thung

 President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of War; Notice of 
Availability of Report

    In compliance with section 13 of Public Law 92-463 (Federal 
Advisory Committee Act) notice is hereby given that a report of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Advisory Committee on Former 
Prisoners of War has been issued. The report summarizes activities and 
recommendations of the Committee on matters relative to VA programs and 
policies affecting former prisoners of war veterans. It is available 
for public inspection at two locations.

Mr. Richard Yarnall, Federal Advisory Committee Desk, Library of 
Congress, Anglo-American Acquisition Division, Government Documents 
Section, Room LM-B42, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington DC 
20540-4172;

 and

Department of Veterans Affairs, Compensation of Pension Service, Room 
645F (21), 1800 G Street, NW., Washington DC 20006.

    Dated: January 17, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-278 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
98-2247.

#### Duhart v. Mohr.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua*sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 32.16-1 Navigation bridge visibility-T/ALL. Each tankship which is 100 meters (328 feet) or more in length and contracted for on or after September 7, 1990, must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The field of vision from the navigation bridge, whether the vessel is in a laden or unladen condition, must be such that: ( 1 ) From the conning position, the view of the sea surface is not obscured forward of the bow by more than the lesser of two ship lengths or 500 meters (1,640 feet) from dead ahead to 10 degrees on either side of the vessel. Within this arc of visibility any blind sector caused by cargo, cargo gear, or other permanent obstruction must not exceed 5 degrees.
( 2 ) From the conning position, the horizontal field of vision extends over an arc from at least 22.5 degrees abaft the beam on one side of the vessel, through dead ahead, to at least 22.5 degrees abaft the beam on the other side of the vessel. Blind sectors forward of the beam caused by cargo, cargo gear, or other permanent obstruction must not exceed 10 degrees each, nor total more than 20 degrees, including any blind sector within the arc of visibility described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) From each bridge wing, the field of vision extends over an arc from at least 45 degrees on the opposite bow, through dead ahead, to at least dead astern.
( 4 ) From the main steering position, the field of vision extends over an arc from dead ahead to at least 60 degrees on either side of the vessel.
( 5 ) From each bridge wing, the respective side of the vessel is visible forward and aft.
( b ) Windows fitted on the navigation bridge must be arranged so that: ( 1 ) Framing between windows is kept to a minimum and is not installed immediately in front of any work station.
( 2 ) Front windows are inclined from the vertical plane, top out, at an angle of not less than 10 degrees and not more than 25 degrees;
( 3 ) The height of the lower edge of the front windows is limited to prevent any obstruction of the forward view previously described in this section; and
( 4 ) The height of the upper edge of the front windows allows a forward view of the horizon at the conning position, for a person with a height of eye of 1.8 meters (71 inches), when the vessel is at a forward pitch angle of 20 degrees.
( c ) Polarized or tinted windows must not be fitted.
[CGD 85-099, 55 FR 32247, Aug. 8, 1990]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 154

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide the penalty of death

for certain murders of State and local correctional officers by incarcerated persons, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide the penalty of death for certain murders of State and local

correctional officers by incarcerated persons, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Correction Officer Pro5 tection Act’’.
2

•HR 154 IH

1 SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 51 (relating to homicide)

3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at

4 the end the following:

5 ‘‘§ 1122. Murder of State and local correctional offi6 cers by prisoners

7 ‘‘(a) Whoever, being incarcerated pursuant to a con8 viction for crime, kills an individual who is a State or local

9 correctional officer—

10 ‘‘(1) while such individual is engaged in carry11 ing out official duties as such officer;

12 ‘‘(2) because of the nature of the official duties

13 of such officer; or

14 ‘‘(3) because of such individual’s being such an

15 officer;

16 shall be subject to the penalty of death, if the killing is

17 a first degree murder, and subject to the penalties pro18 vided in sections 1111 and 1112 of this title in any other

19 case.

20 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

21 ‘‘(1) the term ‘State or local correctional offi22 cer’ means any person who is a State or local officer

23 or employee, as such term is defined in section 1501

24 of title 5, and who in the course of official duty per25 forms corrections-related or law enforcement func26 tions; and
3

•HR 154 IH

1 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State or local government’ in2 cludes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and

3 any other territory and possession of the United

4 States.’’.

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

6 at the beginning of chapter 51 of title 18, United States

7 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘1122. Murder of State and local correctional officers by prisoners.’’.

Æ
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Ashley Quintero, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Ashley Quintero, appellant pro se.Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Village of Briarcliff Manor, Westchester County (Howard T. Code, J.), rendered October 18, 2017. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, convicted defendant of failing to stop at a stop sign.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1172 (a), which provides that "every driver of a vehicle approaching a stop sign shall stop at a clearly marked stop line." Defendant contends that she did, in fact, stop at the stop line and that it was impossible for the police officer who issued her the ticket to see the stop line from where he claims to have observed her.</p><p>In conducting an independent review of the weight of the evidence (<i>see</i> CPL 470.15 [5]; <a href="../2007/2007_09814.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342</a> [2007]), we accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, observe their demeanor, and assess their credibility (<a href="../2006/2006_08641.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Lane</i>, 7 NY3d 888</a>, 890 [2006]; <i>People v Mateo</i>, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; <i>People v Bleakley</i>, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). As defendant gave a different account of <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>the events from that presented by the complaining police officer, the issue presented was primarily one of credibility. Upon our review of the record, we find that the judgment convicting defendant of failing to stop at a stop sign was not against the weight of the evidence (<i>see People v Yeroushalmi</i>, 47 Misc 3d 154[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50821[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2015]).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>RUDERMAN, J.P., TOLBERT and EMERSON, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: August 08, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CompuMed, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. McLaughlin,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  John G.  McLaughlin         |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| John  G.  McLaughlin             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August  13, 2002                      |

 

----
Argued and submitted October 23,

reversed and remanded December 13, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Ana J. Calles, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Los Chiles, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*Ana J. CALLES, *Respondent.*

(93-07622; CA A86199)

907 P2d 1136

Julene M. Quinn argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General.

Donald M. Hooton argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Schneider, Hooton.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

LEESON, J.

*271LEESON, J.

Employer and SAIF seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding claimant attorney fees pursuant to ORS 656.382(1) for employer’s unreasonable resistance to the payment of compensation through the issuance of a premature notice of ineligibility for vocational assistance. Because of the legislature’s amendment of the pertinent statutes, we conclude that the case must be remanded to the Board for further proceedings.

ORS 656.382(1) was amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332, section 42b. As amended, the statute expressly excludes from the Board’s authority the power to award attorney fees under that section in a case involving a dispute over vocational assistance benefits heard by the director. In a separate provision, section 42(d)(5), the legislature provided:

> “Notwithstanding any other provision in ORS 656.382 or 656.386, an Administrative Law Judge or the Workers’ Compensation Board may not award penalties or attorney fees for matters arising under the review jurisdiction of the director.”

Under section 50 of the bill, ORS 656.704(3) was amended to provide that disputes arising under ORS 656.340, regarding vocational benefits, are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the director. As we held in *Volk v. American West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995), the amendments are applicable to all cases pending in litigation or on appeal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the Board for reconsideration in the light of the amendments.

Reversed and remanded.
§ 71.25-40 Sanitary inspection. ( a ) At each annual inspection the passenger and crew quarters, toilet and washing spaces, galleys, serving pantries, lockers, etc., shall be examined by the inspector to be assured that they are in a sanitary condition.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFREY TODD KNUDSON,

Plaintiff, No. 14-14854

v. District Judge George Caram Steeh

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY,

ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on July 10, 2018,

Defendants’ Motion for an Order Directing Plaintiff to Appear for a Mental Examination

[Doc. #123] is GRANTED.

Plaintiff Jeffrey Todd Knudson will appear for an independent medical

examination by Dr. Eduardo Montoya, on a date and time to be mutually agreed upon by

the parties.

Plaintiff is not entitled to any further advance disclosure of the specific tests that

Dr. Montoya intends to employ during the examination. No persons other than Mr.

Knudson, Dr. Montoya, and Dr. Montoya’s staff may be present in the examination room

during testing, and the examination will not be recorded. Following the completion of

testing, Plaintiff is entitled to receive Dr. Montoya’s report and conclusions, as well as

Dr. Montoya’s raw test data and any other factual information that he relies on in forming

his conclusions.

-1-
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2018 s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on July 17, 2018 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with

the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered

electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to non-registered ECF

participants on July 17, 2018.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla 

Case Manager for the 

Honorable R. Steven Whalen 

-2-
#### Darley Randall, *Respondent, v.*The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 46.15-5 Engineering requirements. ( a ) Bilge and ballast systems, piping, inlets and discharges, ash chutes, astern power, and auxiliary steering shall be in accordance with the provisions of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.