alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Video Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas Spanier, Chief Executive Officer, and
Douglas T. Watson, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.		The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.		The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.

/s/ Thomas Spanier				                   Thomas Spanier
                   Chief Executive Officer
                   (Principal Executive Officer)
   April 15, 2005

/s/ Douglas T. Watson				                   Douglas T. Watson
                   Chief Financial Officer
                   (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
                   April 15, 2005

---
§ 46.05-1 Passenger vessel. ( a ) For the purpose of the regulations in this part, a vessel is a passenger vessel if: ( 1 ) Engaged on an international voyage by sea, it carries or is authorized to carry more than 12 passengers; or,
( 2 ) Engaged on a coastwise voyage by sea or a voyage on the Great Lakes, it carries or is authorized to carry more than 16 persons in addition to the crew.
EXHIBIT 32.
COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Each of the undersigned, Thomas G. Hudson and Gregory T. Barnum, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of ComputerNetwork Technology Corporation (the “Company”), individually and not jointlyhas executed this Certification in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2004 (the “Report”).
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:
 • the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 • the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Certification asof the 9th day of December, 2004.         /s/ Thomas G. Hudson   Thomas G. Hudson   Chief Executive Officer       /s/ Gregory T. Barnum   Gregory T. Barnum   Chief Financial Officer   
A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHERDOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THATAPPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENTREQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGYCORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ANDFURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON ITS WRITTEN REQUEST.
33
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.23 H.R. 562--Unfinished Business]
[Page 378]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.23  h.r. 562--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced the further unfinished business to be the motion to suspend 
the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 562) to modify the boundaries of 
Walnut Canyon National Monument in the State of Arizona; as amended.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

371

affirmative

Nays

49
```
Argued April 3,

affirmed April 9, 1918.

#### HENDRY *v.*HENDRY.

(171 Pac. 1051.)

Divorce — Decree Based on Contradictory Testimony.

1. As trial judge who had witnesses before him was better able to appraise the value of the testimony than the court on appeal, decree in divorce suit will be affirmed, where court on appeal is of opinion that evidence sustains decree.

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge.

Department 2. This is a suit for divorce. There was a decree for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. John J. Fitzgerald*and *Messrs. Johnson & Logan,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Fitzgerald.*

For respondent there was a brief over the name of *Messrs. Seton & Strahan,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Waldemar Seton.*

McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.
§ 67.107 System of measurement; evidence. ( a ) The gross and net tonnage and dimensions of a vessel for purposes of this part are determined in accordance with 46 CFR part 69.
( b ) A certificate of measurement issued by an authorized official is the only acceptable evidence of the gross and net tonnage of a vessel measured in accordance with subpart B, C, or D of 46 CFR part 69. A certificate of measurement is not issued for vessels measured under subpart E of 46 CFR part 69 since the gross and net tonnage are determined as part of the documentation process.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1003, as amended by USCG-2001-10224, 66 FR 48620, Sept. 21, 2001]
Exhibit
31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I Marvin
D. Rosen, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report of Fusion Telecommunications International,
Inc.
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared:
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 ****Dated: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Marvin S.
      RosenMarvin S. RosenChairman
      of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
#### BELLA CHAUSMER, APPELLANT, v. HERMAN ARONS, RESPONDENT.

Argued January 16, 1929

Decided July 3, 1929.

Before Justices Trenchard, Kalisch and Lloyd.

Eor the appellant, *Joseph Zemel.*

Eor the respondent, *Fast & Fast.*

*613Pee Curiam.

This was an action by a landlord to recover three months’ rent of premises on Springfield avenue, in Newark. There was judgment by the court for one month’s rent only, amounting to $175, and from this judgment the plaintiff appeals.

From an agreed state of the case it appears that the tenancy was under a lease from August 5th, 1925, to August 31st, 1928, at the rental of $175 per month. The tenant paid the rent for the month of May, 1928, but refused to pay for June, July and August, 1928. The reason for this refusal was that on June 5th there was a fire which resulted in a partial destruction of the building on the leased premises. On June 6th plaintiff learned of the fire and made immediate offer to repair. The defendant, not having come to an agreement with his insurance carriers as to his damages, refused to permit the plaintiff to make the repairs until the early part of August, when permission was given and the repairs were begun and completed bjr September 1st. The defendant claimed abatement of the rent for the time necessary to make the repairs, and the plaintiff claimed that there should be no abatement. The lease contained this clause:

“That the tenant shall, in case of fire, give immediate notice thereof to the landlord, who shall thereupon cause the damage to be repaired forthwith; but if the premises be so damaged that the landlord shall decide to rebuild, the term shall cease and the accrued rent be paid up to the time of the fire.”

While the lease calls for the immediate report of the fire and repair of the property, it contains no stipulations for suspension of the rent and in no event could the tenant refuse permission to make the repairs and then complain that they were not made.

Nor does section 31 of the Landlord and Tenant act *(Comp. Stab., p.*3078), which provides that “whenever any building or buildings erected on leased premises shall be injured by fire, without the fault of the lessee, the landlord shall repair the same as speedily as possible, or in default thereof the *614rent shall cease until such time as such building or buildings shall be put in repair/’ aid the defendant. This statute only modifies the common law under which the tenant was liable absolutely for the rent by requiring that the landlord shall repair the damage as speedily as possible and relieves from payment of rent only on the landlord’s failure to repair when the fire shall be without the fault of the tenant. Here there was no failure to repair "as speedily as possible” (the tenant having refused permission), nor, as was essential, did the defendant meet the burden imposed on him to prove that the fire was without his fault. *Colonial Land Co.*v. Asmus, 77 *Atl. Rep.*1022.

The judgment is reversed'.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0498 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM212AD
747 - 53A2784 --- 8/27/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket **MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Dec 3 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System West Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Addendum of aircraft for operation under approved Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA - 2015 - 1848 (Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11of the Federal Aviation Regulations ) Dear Sir or Madam: WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. (WinTec) respectfully requests an Addendum for the DJ I S1000 and the 3DR-Aero to our previously approved exemption. WinTec will adhere to the same rules and regulation as previousl y approved for Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA - 2015 - 1848 . Reference approved exemptions : DJIS1000: Exemption No. 11467, Regulatory Docket No . FAA - 2015 - 0261 3DR-AERO: Exemption No. 11617, Regulatory Docket No . FAA - 2015 - 0549 **Appendix A: Manufacturer Small Unmanned Aerial System Information**

Joseph T. (Todd) Madison, Chief Pilot WinTec Arrowmaker MadisonT@arrowmaker.com, (813) 805 - 2714**Appendix A:** 

# DJI S1000

# 3DR **- Aero** 

**Specifications:** Autopilot: 3DR Pixhawk V2.4.5 Firmware: ArduPlane 3.1.1 GPS: 3DR u - blox GPS with Compass (LEA - 6H module, 5 Hz update) Telemetry radio: 3DR Radio v2 (915 mHz or 433 mHz) Motors: Tiger Motor AT2820 - 7 830 kVFrame: Fixed wing

Propellers: Gemfan 11x7 Battery: 4S 6000 mAh 35C lithium polymer Aircraft weight (with battery): 6.8 lbs (3 kg) Aircraft dimensions: 74 in (188 cm ) wingspan, 51 in (129 cm) length Case dimensions: 60.75 in x 14.5 in x 15.5 in (154 cm x 37 cm x 39 cm) Payload capacity: 1.1 lbs (500 g) Radio range: .6 miles* (1 km) Flight time: 40 min* Maximum operational wind speed: 25 mph (11 m/s) Landing accuracy: 6.5 ft latitude x 131 ft longitude (2 m x 40 m) Recommended flight speed: 33 mph (15 m/s) Camera: Canon SX260 12.1 megapixel Camera software: 3DR EAI 1.0 Area coverage (single flight): 250 acres* (1 km2 ) Orthomosaic accuracy: 3 - 16 ft (1 - 5 m) Ground sampling distance: 2 inches per pixel* (5 cm per pixel) Image processing software: Pix4Dmapper LT 3DR Edition (Windows only) *Figures reflect estimated values at ideal operating conditions. Envi ronmental conditions can affect l ight tim e, range, area coverage, and ground sampling distance.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 21, 2009

|Filer                       | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP. | 4c8            | Farmers National Banc Corp, Canfield, Ohio, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Butler Wick Trust Company, Youngstown, Ohio, and thereby engage in general trust activities | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                  | Not applicable
|Federal Register:           | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2009 (April 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1



10.02

                      July 20, 1999

                                                      PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

                      Mr. Michael Forster
                      #400 - 601 W. Cordova Street
                      Vancouver, B.C.   V6B 1G1

                      Dear Michael:

                      Re:    Management Consulting Agreement

                      The purpose of this letter is to make you an offer of
                      Management Consulting on the following terms and
                      conditions:

                      1)     Position: President, COO, and Director

                      2)     Salary:$140,000 USD per annum

                      3)     Term: This Management Consulting agreement is for a
                             period of two years, ending August 31, 2001.

                      4)     Stock Options: Smartsources.com will grant 150,000
                             company options at the allowable price as dictated
                             by rules of the NASD and SEC.

                      5)     Termination: In the event you wish to terminate
                             this agreement, you will provide the Company with
                             reasonable notice. In the event that the Company
                             wishes to terminate this agreement, it shall be
                             obligated to provide you with not less than eight
                             months notice or pay in lieu thereof.

                      6)     Position Review: Smartsources.com will review the
                             performance and contribution of Michael Forster in
                             the first 6 months of this contract and if the
                             performance is deemed positive will update the
                             position to CEO.


<PAGE>   2



                      Page 2

                      7)     Conditions Precedent: The obligations of both
                             parties to this agreement will be subject to the
                             following:

                      -    The Company will receive $2,000,000 million USD in
                           interim financing as currently contemplated.

                      -    Michael Forster will stay as a director of Mercury
                           for a period of time.

                      -    Michael Forster receives nomination to the
                           Smartsources.com Board of Directors as soon as
                           possible.

                      If you are in agreement with the term and conditions set
                      out in this letter, please sign and return a copy to us.

                      We look forward to continue our relationship with you at
                      Smartsources.com.

                      Sincerely,

                      SMARTSOURCES.COM

                      /s/ Nathan Nifco
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DIRECTOR
                      ---------------------------------



                      ---------------------------------
                      MICHAEL J. FORSTER
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32624-32627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2919]



[[Page 32624]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-23]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-165 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-23 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: June 7, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 32625]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JN07.041


[[Page 32626]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JN07.042


[[Page 32627]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JN07.043

[FR Doc. 07-2919 Filed 6-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C