alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6224

TERON H. JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN LEWIS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (5:18-cv-03469-MGL)

Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teron H. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Teron H. Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failure to comply with a court order directing 

him to pay the required filing fee or file an in forma pauperis application.

*

 We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson 

v. Lewis, No. 5:18-cv-03469-MGL (D.S.C. Jan. 22, 2019). We deny a certificate of 

appealability as unnecessary. See Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180 (2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

 * We conclude that the district court’s order is final and appealable because the 

defect identified by the district court must be cured by something more than an 

amendment to the allegations in the § 2254 petition. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid 

Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015).
Order entered May 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00546-CR

No. 05-13-00547-CR

EDGAR ALBERTO ROMO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 199-82866-2012, 199-81976-2011

ORDER

The State’s May 20, 2014 second motion for extension of time to file the State’s brief is 

GRANTED. The State’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on May 20, 2014 is DEEMED

timely filed on the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 21, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|CHESAPEAKE BANK   | Premises       | Chesapeake Bank, Kilmarnock, Virginia, to increase its investment in bank premises | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2009 (April 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,058,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,000
<INVENTORY>                                     60,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,461,000
<PP&E>                                       4,061,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,732,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,831,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          703,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    903,000
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,979,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,008,000
<SALES>                                      1,360,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,360,000
<CGS>                                          138,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,269,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,218,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,218,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,218,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains  summary financial  information extracted  from the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheets for POWERCOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES at
December 31,  1999  and  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  for
POWERCOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the year ended December 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  427,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               598,030
<PP&E>                                         398,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,732,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,130,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,876
<OTHER-SE>                                     593,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,732,824
<SALES>                                        442,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,268
<CGS>                                          349,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,024,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (71,767)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (901,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,076,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (103,462)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,076,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.015)








</TABLE>
§ 401.405 Pilotage rates and charges. ( a ) The hourly rate for pilotage service on— ( 1 ) The St. Lawrence River is $927;
( 2 ) Lake Ontario is $608;
( 3 ) Lake Erie is $597
( 4 ) The navigable waters from Southeast Shoal to Port Huron, MI is $667;
( 5 ) Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior is $430; and
( 6 ) The St. Mary's River is $836.
( b ) The pilotage charge is calculated by multiplying the hourly rate by the hours or fraction thereof (rounded to the nearest 15 minutes) that the registered pilot is on the bridge or available to the master of the vessel, multiplied by the weighting factor shown in § 401.400 of this part.
[USCG-2015-0497, 81 FR 11940, Mar. 7, 2016, as amended by USCG-2019-0736, 85 FR 20120, Apr. 9, 2020; USCG-2022-0370, 88 FR 12258, Feb. 27, 2023; USCG-2023-0438, 89 FR 9072, Feb. 9, 2024]
Description of Compensatory Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.21  
  
 DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS 
 BETWEEN VARIAN, INC. AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
  
 Each director (other than the Chairman of the Board) who is not a Company employee is paid an annual retainer fee of $30,000. Each non-employee director
is also paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each Board meeting attended by telephone and $1,500 for each Board committee meeting attended in person or by telephone. The non-employee director who chairs the Audit
Committee of the Board is paid an additional annual retainer fee of $15,000. The non-employee directors who chair the Compensation and the Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board are each paid an additional annual retainer fee of $7,500.
The non-employee Chairman of the Board is paid an annual retainer fee of $120,000 (in lieu of any other annual cash retainer, committee chair retainer and meeting attendance fees). 
  
 Under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not a Company employee receives upon initial appointment
or election to the Board a nonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and receives annually thereafter (for so long as he or she continues to serve a non-employee director) a nonqualified stock option to
acquire 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In lieu of these grants, the non-employee Chairman of the Board receives upon initial appointment as such a nonqualified stock option to acquire 50,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock. All such stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, are vested and exercisable beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year term. 
  
 Under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not a
Company employee is also granted annually (for so long as he or she continues to serve a non-employee director) stock units with an initial value equal to $25,000, based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.
The stock units vest and are paid upon termination of the director’s service on the Board of Directors, and are satisfied by issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock. 
  
 Directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the retainer, chairman or meeting fees described above,
shares of the Company’s common stock based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the fees would have been paid. 
  
 Each director is reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that such director and his or her spouse incurs attending Board meetings and
functions.
#### Edward B. Lord, *Administrator, etc.,*and others, *Respondents, v.*William Tiffany, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barker, J.
#### § 327.50 Statute of limitations for other admiralty claims and claim requirements.

A civil suit must be filed within the statute of limitations of the specific admiralty claim. The start date for such statute of limitations determinations shall be the Accrual Date.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                          DIGITAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC.

             STATEMENT REGARDING THE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                Year Ended    Three Months      Year Ended
                                                 March 31,   Ended March 31,   December 31,
                                                   1997           1996            1995
                                                ----------   ---------------   ------------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>             <C>
Net Loss                                         $(12,911)     $(1,361)        $(4,483)
                                                 ========      =======         =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding(1)       9,777        2,175           2,220

Common equivalent shares from common stock,
and preferred stock, and options and warrants 
to purchase common stock issued during
the twelve months prior to the Company's
initial public offering(1)                             --        1,991           1,991
                                                 --------      -------         -------

Shares used in computing net loss per share         9,777        4,166           4,211
                                                 ========      =======         =======
Net loss per share                               $  (1.32)     $ (0.33)        $ (1.06)
                                                 ========      =======         =======

Convertible preferred stock issued more than
12 months prior to the initial public
offering(1)                                                                      1,127
                                                                               -------
Pro forma weighted average shares                                                5,338
                                                                               =======
Pro forma net loss per share                                                   $ (0.84)
                                                                               =======
</TABLE> 
(1) excludes shares placed in escrow
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Exemption # 9532B
MIE 700 Order to Show Cause in Writing (Rev. 3/98)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DOROTHY MAE ROSS,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and

CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, LLC

Defendant(s).

/

CASE NUMBER: 15-11674

HONORABLE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF(S) TO

SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) respond in writing or otherwise show good cause on or before FEBRUARY

11, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed, for LACK OF PROGRESS in accordance to E.D. Mich. L.R.

41.2 AS TO DEFENDANT CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, LLC.

This order will serve as notice to the Plaintiff(s) as required by Fed.R.Civ.P 4(m) and E.D. Mich. L.R. 41.2.

DATED: February 4, 2016 s/Marianne O. Battani

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email

addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 4, 2016.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2:15-cv-11674-MOB-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 02/04/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 30
<PAGE>   1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-07625 pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, 1996 Equity
Incentive Plan, 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan and 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of Excite, Inc.) of our report dated January 29, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Excite, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
    


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, California
   
April 15, 1997
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 22, 2008

|Filer                             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|CORNERSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1       | Cornerstone Financial Corporation, Mount Laurel, NJ, to form a bank holding company by acquiring Cornerstone Bank, Mount Laurel, NJ. | Newspaper:12/15/2008Federal Register:12/12/2008
|Newspaper:                        | 12/15/2008 
|Federal Register:                 | 12/12/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|AMERICAN BK, ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA | 2580243 | 06/16/2008 | 11/11/2008     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2009 (January 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2545 

To provide a civil penalty for certain misrepresentations made to Congress, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. CAMPBELL, and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

A BILL 

To provide a civil penalty for certain misrepresentations 

made to Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Classified Information 

5 Accountability Act of 2009’’ or ‘‘CIA Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CIVIL PENALTY FOR CERTAIN MISREPRESENTA7 TION MADE TO CONGRESS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever, being a member of the 

9 intelligence community, knowingly and willfully— 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2545 IH

1 (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, 

2 scheme, or device a material fact; 

3 (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or 

4 fraudulent statement or representation; or 

5 (3) makes or uses any false writing or docu6 ment knowing the same to contain any materially 

7 false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; 

8 in any communication to a United States Senator or Rep9 resentative that involves classified material shall be liable 

10 for a civil penalty of not more than $10,000. 

11 (b) EMPLOYEE NOT TO BE INDEMNIFIED.—No 

12 United States agency or department may directly or indi13 rectly indemnify a person for that person’s liability under 

14 this section. 

15 (c) CONGRESSIONAL STANDING TO SUE.—A Senator 

16 or Representative who was a party to the communication 

17 with respect to which a violation of subsection (a) took 

18 place may in a civil action, recover the civil penalty pro19 vided by this section on behalf of the United States, to 

20 be deposited in the United States Treasury for public use. 

21 (d) IN CAMERA REVIEW OF CLASSIFIED INFORMA22 TION.—In a civil action under this section, the court shall 

23 conduct any review of classified information in camera. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 2545 IH

1 (e) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS NOT APPLICABLE.— 

2 A civil action under this section may be brought at any 

3 time without limitation. 

4 (f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

5 (1) the term ‘‘member of the intelligence com6 munity’’ means a person employed by the intel7 ligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the 

8 National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a(4)); 

9 and 

10 (2) the term ‘‘classified information’’ means 

11 any information or material that has been deter12 mined by the United States Government pursuant to 

13 an Executive order, statute, or regulation, to require 

14 protection against unauthorized disclosure for rea15 sons of national security. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5050]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada; 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting: Correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 24, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published 
a notice announcing a meeting of the Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board, Nevada to be held on March 9, 2011 (76 FR 
10343). This document makes several corrections to that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Rupp, Board Administrator, 232 
Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 657-
9088; Fax (702) 295-5300 or E-mail: ntscab@nv.doe.gov.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of February 24, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-4148, 
on page 10343, please make the following corrections:
    Under DATES, third column, first paragraph, the meeting date has 
been changed. The new date is March 16, 2011.
    Under ADDRESSES, third column, second paragraph, the meeting 
address has been changed. The new address is the Sun City Aliante 
Community Center, 7394 Aliante Parkway, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89084.
    Under Tentative Agenda, third column, there has been an additional 
topic added. The additional topic is DOE Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-
Level Radioactive Waste and GTCC-Like Waste (Draft EIS, DOE/EIS-0375D) 
Update.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on March 1, 2011.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-5050 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```