alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.05-5 Specific application noted in text. ( a ) At the beginning of the various parts, subparts, and sections, a more specific application is generally given for the particular portion of the text involved. This application sets forth the types, sizes, or services of vessels to which the text pertains, and in many cases limits the application of the text to vessels contracted for before or after a specific date. As used in this subchapter, the term *vessels contracted for* includes not only the contracting for the construction of a vessel, but also the contracting for a material alteration to a vessel, the contracting for the conversion of a vessel to a passenger vessel, and the changing of service or route of a vessel if such change increases or modifies the general requirements for the vessel or increases the hazards to which it might be subjected.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 110 (Friday, June 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 31856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International--Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 9, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International--Standards 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards developing activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of 
current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between February 
2007 and May 2007, designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM 
Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at 
http:///www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 13, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17582).
    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., 
General Counsel, at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 
telephone 610-832-9597, e-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#681c070a1a010d0628091b1c0546071a0f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c18030e1e0509022c0d1f180142031e0b">[email protected]</span></a>.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-2855 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending April 25, 2009

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                
|--------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|DIME MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY | * 3A1         | Application filed by Dime Mutual Holding Company, Norwich, Connecticut to become a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting shares of Dime Bank, Norwich, Connecticut, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 18, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 2384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2007-28314.                

*Date Filed:*                     May 23, 2007.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     Mail Vote 540 Adoption, Expected Resolution 002kk, (Memo 0666) Intended effective date: 1 July 2007.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2007-28347.                

*Date Filed:*                     May 25, 2007.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     Mail vote 539—Resolution 010t, TC12 North Atlantic-Middle East, except between U.S.A. and Jordan, Special Passenger Amending Resolution, From Israel (IL) to North Atlantic, (Memo 0273) Intended effective date: 1 June 2007.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 07-2891 Filed 6-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-M
**ArkansasAdvisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights**

| **Katherine      P. Mitchell, *Chairperson***Little Rock                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Mary      Lu Baker**West Memphis
**Andre      Guerrero***Little Rock
**Doris      M. Both**Royal        
**Rabbi      Eugene H. Levy**Little Rock
**Elijah      Coleman**Pine Bluff
**Alvin      Lopez***Rogers
**D.      Nathan Coulter**Little Rock
**Jerome      E. Ngundue**Little Rock
**Harold      J. Evans***Little Rock
**Danielle      D. Strickman**Fayetteville
**Father      R. Scott-Friend**Little Rock
**Beverly      J. Divers-White**Little Rock
* Not a member at the time of thefact-finding meeting

 

**Acknowledgments**

TheArkansas Advisory Committee wishes to thank the staff of the Commission�sCentral Regional Office for its help in the preparation of this report. Theproject was the principal assignment of Farella E. Robinson, civil rightsanalyst, with support from Jo Ann Daniels. Editorial services were provided by Dawn Sweet, editor, RegionalPrograms. The project was carried out under the overall supervision of Melvin L.Jenkins, director, Central Regional Office.   |
Order filed March 31, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00244-CR

____________

MARQUIS DIAMOND, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1371877

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On December 1, 2014, appellant filed a motion to abate this appeal and 

direct the trial court to sign and file findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and 

conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, 

even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. art. 38.22 ' 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 

The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate 
the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1987). On December 4, 2014, we granted the motion and issued an order abating 

the appeal and directing the trial court to make and file findings of fact and 

conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings and conclusions filed with 

the clerk of this Court on or before January 9, 2015.

The supplemental record containing the trial court’s findings and 

conclusions was not filed as requested. On January 27, 2015, the clerk of this court 

sent a letter to the trial court requesting that the supplemental record be filed with 

this court at the earliest possible date. The supplemental record has not been filed, 

and no response to this court’s letter has been received. Accordingly, we issue the 

following order. 

The trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and 

conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings and conclusions filed with 

the clerk of this court on or before April 30, 2015.

The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this 

court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket 

when the supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and 

recommendations is filed in this court. The court also will consider an appropriate 

motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. Appellant’s brief shall be due 

30 days after the appeal is reinstated.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Michael Thoben, III, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/ E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III                          |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   |
| **E. Michael Thoben, III**                          |   |
| **Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer** |   |
| **March 28, 2003**                                  |   |
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.171-25 Production testing. ( a ) Immersion suit production testing is conducted under the procedures in this section and subpart 159.007 of this chapter.
( b ) One out of every 100 immersion suits produced must be tested as prescribed in § 160.171-17(g) and must be given a complete visual examination. The suit must be selected at random from a production lot of 100 suits and tested by or under the supervision of the independent laboratory. A suit fails this test if— ( 1 ) The measured buoyancy of the suit differs by more than 10% from the measured buoyancy of the suit tested for approval,
( 2 ) The adjusted buoyancy of the suit calculated using the buoyancy loss factor determined during approval testing is less than that required in § 160.171-11(a)(1), or
( 3 ) The visual examination shows that the suit does not conform to the approved design.
( c ) If the suit fails to pass the test as prescribed in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section, 10 additional suits from the same lot must be selected at random and subjected to the test. If a defect in the suit is detected upon visual examination, 10 additional suits from the same lot must be selected at random and examined for the defect.
( d ) If one or more of the 10 suits fails to pass the test or examination, each suit in the lot must be tested or examined for the defect for which the lot was rejected. Only suits that pass the test or that are free of defects may be sold as Coast Guard approved.
( e ) The manufacturer must ensure that the quality control procedure described in the test plans previously submitted for approval under § 159.005-9(a)(5)(iii) is followed.
Figure 160.171(e)(1)(i). Water can for insulation test
Figure 160.171-17(e)(1)(v). Insulation Test Assembly
EXHIBIT 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                              (Interlink Form 10-K)


          The undersigned, an officer and/or director of Interlink Electronics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint
E. Michael Thoben, III the undersigned's true and lawful attorney and agent, to
do any and all acts and things and execute in the undersigned's name as an
officer or director of the Company the Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and
all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said
attorneys and agents and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and may exercise, all
powers conferred.

          Dated: March 26, 1999.


                                       GEORGE GU
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       George Gu


                                       EUGENE F. HOVANEC
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Eugene F. Hovanec


                                       MERRITT M. LUTZ
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Merritt M. Lutz


                                       CAROLYN MACDOUGALL
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Carolyn MacDougall
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interlink Electronics, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 033-93066,333-39371, 333-53870 and 333-107174) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-112034) on Form S-3 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of InterlinkElectronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

June 2, 2004
#### § 25.25-7 Marking.

The lifesaving equipment required by this subpart must be legibly marked as specified in subchapter Q of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of FirstCity Financial Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, James T. Sartain, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, that:  (1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 31, 2009
  /s/   JAMES T. SARTAINJames T. SartainPresident and Chief Executive
  Officer(Principal Executive Officer)   The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 555.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) *Common carrier, marine terminal operator, ocean transportation intermediary, ocean common carrier, person, shipper, shippers' association,* and *United States* have the meanings given each such term, respectively, in section 3 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40102);
( b ) *Foreign carrier* means an ocean common carrier a majority of whose vessels are documented under the laws of a country other than the United States;
( c ) *Maritime services* means port-to-port carriage of cargo by the vessels operated by ocean common carriers;
( d ) *Maritime-related services* means intermodal operations, terminal operations, cargo solicitation, agency services, ocean transportation intermediary services and operations, and all other activities and services integral to total transportation systems of ocean common carriers and their foreign domiciled affiliates on their own and others' behalf;
( e ) *United States carrier* means an ocean common carrier which operates vessels documented under the laws of the United States;
( f ) *United States oceanborne trade* means the carriage of cargo between the United States and a foreign country, whether direct or indirect, by an ocean common carrier;
( g ) *Voyage* means an inbound or outbound movement between a foreign country and the United States by a vessel engaged in the United States oceanborne trade. Each inbound or outbound movement constitutes a separate voyage.
[54 FR 11533, Mar. 21, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 8010, Feb. 18, 1999; 74 FR 50733, Oct. 1, 2009]