alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          40,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      29,010,088
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,134,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,740,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,323,177
<BONDS>                                     17,077,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,459,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,740,808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,373,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,123,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,411,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,650,894)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,650,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,650,894)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (64.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EX-10.5



 






Exhibit 10.5




February 2, 2005




Jeffrey A. Eckmann

409 Orchard Park Drive

Bermuda Run, NC 27006




Dear Jeff:



     When signed in the space provided below, this document shall constitute an acceptance of an
amendment to your offer of employment letter dated July 29, 2004.



     Your offer of employment letter is hereby amended by adding the following explanatory language
regarding your eligibility for severance and the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP):




	 	•  	Following the termination of your active employment, projected to be August 31,
2006, you will be eligible to receive severance under the terms of a Special Severance
Benefits and Change of Control Protection agreement, subject to approval by the RAI
Board of Directors.
	 
	 	•  	If you are terminated from active employment under circumstances that make you
eligible for the terms of Special Severance Benefits and Change of Control Protections
agreement, any LTIP granted to you will be deemed to be fully vested on your last day
of active employment.





     Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this amendment by signing below and returning
it to Ann Johnston. A copy will be provided to you.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	 	 	/s/ Ann A. Johnston
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	Ann A. Johnston

Executive Vice President

Human Resources






	 	 	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and Accepted:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	     /s/ Jeffrey A. Eckmann
	 	 
	     Jeffrey A. Eckmann
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Date:      February 4, 2005
Exhibit
15.1





May 14,
2009





American
Medical Alert Corp.


Oceanside,
New York





We have
reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of
American Medical Alert Corp. and Subsidiaries for the fiscal periods ended March
31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, as indicated in our report dated May 14,
2009.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.





We are
aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, is incorporated by
reference in the following Registration Statements:





·
            Registration
      Statement No. 33-48385 on Form S-8;


·
            Registration
      Statement No. 33-91806 on Form S-8;


·
            Registration
      Statement No. 333-53029 on Form
S-8;


·
            Registration
      Statement No. 333-70626 on Form
S-8;


·
            Registration
      Statement No. 333-130811 on Form S-8;
and


·
            Registration
      Statement No. 333-88192 on Form
S-3.





We also
are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





/s/
Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP





Margolin,
Winer & Evens LLP


Garden
City, New York
#### James E. Delaney, *Appellant, v.*William C. Van Aulen, *Testamentary Trustee, etc., Respondent*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
From: Lee, Arthur

To: Heggs, Angela

Subject: FW: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Date: Monday, February 09, 2015 10:24:34 AM

-----Original Message-----

From: Lee, Arthur

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 2:33 PM

To: 'NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG'

Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Mr. Nash

The proposed rule requires extension cords within the scope of the rule to meet all applicable safety

characteristics outlined in the proposed rule. The absence of any one of the characteristics would make

the product a substantial product hazard. See 80 FR 5701.

I hope this answers your question. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Arthur Lee

US Consumer Product Safety Commission

Directorate for Engineering Sciences

Division of Electrical Engineering

5 Research Place

Rockville, MD 20850

301 987-2008

alee@cpsc.gov

-----Original Message-----

From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:30 PM

To: Lee, Arthur

Subject: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Good morning, sir!

I am seeking clarification to the proposed rule. Is the proposal for extension cords to have ALL 4 of the

readily observable characteristics or at least 1 characteristic? Your help in clearing this up is greatly

appreciated.

Thank you!

Shane Nash

Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC.

Air Force Safety Center

Kirtland AFB, NM

DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 14, 2009

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|RBancshares, Inc.           | * 3A1         | Rbancshares, Inc., Westerviile, Ohio to become a bank holding company by acquiring 80.10% of the outstanding voting shares of Ohio State Bancshares, Inc., Marion, Ohio and thereby indirectly acquire Ohio State Bank, Marion, Ohio pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act | Newspaper:12/02/2009Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                  | 12/02/2009   
|Federal Register:           | Not available
|The St, Henry Bancorp, Inc. | * 18C* 3A1    | Application by The St. Henry Bancorp, Inc., St. Henry, OH to become a bank holdinng company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of The St. Henry Bank, St. Henry, OH and application by The St. Henry Bank, St. Henry, OH to merge with SHB Interim Bank, St. Henry, OH.                      | Newspaper:12/04/2009Federal Register:12/08/2009   
|Newspaper:                  | 12/04/2009   
|Federal Register:           | 12/08/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending May 17, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

May 8,2009

 

CharlesT. Chrietzberg, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

i.                  that this annual  report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.               thatinformation contained in the annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)forthe year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations  of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/  Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Charles  T. Chrietzberg, Jr.      |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

----
§ 76.27-1 Application. ( a ) Where a fire detection and alarm system is installed, the provisions of this subpart, with the exception of §§ 76.27-80 and 76.27-90, apply to all installations contracted for on or after July 22, 2021. Installations contracted for on or after November 19, 1952, and prior to July 22, 2021 must meet the requirements of § 76.27-80. Installations contracted for prior to November 19, 1952, must meet the requirements of § 76.27-90.
( b ) The design, manufacture, installation, and operation of fire detection and alarm systems must be in accordance with either: ( 1 ) Sections 76.27-5 through 76.27-35; or
( 2 ) SOLAS Chapter II-2, Regulation 7 and FSS Code Chapter 9 (both incorporated by reference, see § 76.01-2) as detailed in § 76.27-70.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1612

To require the general application of the antitrust laws to major league

baseball, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1995

Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida, Mr.

OWENS, Mr. PARKER, Mr. MCKEON, and Mr. TRAFICANT) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require the general application of the antitrust laws to

major league baseball, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Major League Baseball

5 Antitrust Reform Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO PRO7 FESSIONAL MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL.

8 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

9 by adding at the end the following new section:
2

•HR 1612 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 27. (a) Subject to subsection (b), the antitrust

2 laws shall apply to the business of professional major

3 league baseball.

4 ‘‘(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to af5 fect—

6 ‘‘(1) the applicability or nonapplicability of the

7 antitrust laws to professional baseball’s amateur

8 draft, the minor league reserve clause, the Profes9 sional Baseball Agreement, or any other matter re10 lating to the minor leagues;

11 ‘‘(2) the applicability or nonapplicability of the

12 antitrust laws to any restraint by professional base13 ball on franchise relocation; or

14 ‘‘(3) the application of Public Law 87–331 (15

15 U.S.C. 1291 et seq.) (commonly known as the

16 Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961).’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FirstCity Financial Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 and S-3 of FirstCity Financial Corporation and subsidiaries of our report
dated February 8, 1995, relating to the consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows of J-Hawk Corporation and subsidiaries, the
predecessor entity of FirstCity Financial Corporation, for the year ended
December 31, 1994, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation and subsidiaries.


                                        JAYNES, REITMEIER, BOYD & THERRELL, P.C.
Waco, Texas
March 10, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
     Company's financial statements for the four months ended December 31,
     1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         23
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23
<PP&E>                                         320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (587)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (50)
        
<PAGE>


</TABLE>
§ 67.36 Trust. ( a ) For the purpose of obtaining a registry or recreational endorsement, a trust arrangement meets citizenship requirements if: ( 1 ) Each of its trustees is a citizen; and
( 2 ) Each beneficiary with an enforceable interest in the trust is a citizen.
( b ) For the purpose of obtaining a fishery endorsement, a trust arrangement meets citizenship requirements if: ( 1 ) It meets all the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) At least 75 percent of the equity interest in the trust, at each tier of the trust and in the aggregate, is owned by citizens.
( c ) For the purpose of obtaining a coastwise endorsement a trust arrangement meets citizenship requirements if: ( 1 ) It meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and at least 75 percent of the equity interest in the trust is owned by citizens; or
( 2 ) It meets the requirements of § 68.60 or § 68.105 of this chapter.
[CGD 94-008, 59 FR 49846, Sept. 30, 1994, as amended by USCG-1999-6095, 65 FR 76576, Dec. 7, 2000; USCG-2001-8825, 69 FR 5401, Feb. 4, 2004; USCG-2005-20258, 71 FR 61417, Oct. 18, 2006; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49230, Sept. 25, 2009]
§ 58.30-35 Testing. ( a ) All fluid power and control systems and components thereof must be tested as required by this section.
( b ) Accumulators constructed as pressure vessels under the provisions of part 54 of this subchapter must be tested and retested as required by parts 54 and 61 of this subchapter.
( c ) Fluid power and control systems and piping assemblies must be given an installation test as follows: ( 1 ) Fluid power and control systems and piping assemblies and associated equipment components, including hydraulic steering gear, in lieu of being tested at the time of installation, may be shop tested by the manufacturer to 1.5 times the maximum allowable pressure of the system. The required test pressure must be maintained for a sufficient amount of time to check all components for strength and porosity and to permit an inspection to be made of all connections.
( 2 ) Fluid power and control systems and associated hydraulic equipment components which have been tested in conformance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section and so certified by the manufacturer, may be tested after installation as a complete assembly by stalling the driven unit in a safe and satisfactory manner and by blowing the relief valves. Otherwise, these systems must be hydrostatically tested in the presence of a marine inspector at a pressure of 1.5 times the maximum allowable pressure.
( 3 ) Fluid power and control systems incorporating hydropneumatic accumulators containing rupture discs may be tested at the maximum allowable working pressure of the system in lieu of 1.5 times this value as prescribed in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section provided the accumulators have been previously tested in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section and welded or brazed piping joints are not employed in the system. If welded or brazed joints are employed, the system must be tested in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section except that the accumulators may be isolated from the remainder of the system.
( d ) Fluid power and control systems must be purged with an inert gas or with the working fluid and all trapped air bled from the system prior to any shipboard testing.
( e ) Fluid control systems, such as boiler combustion controls, containing components with internal parts, such as bellows or other sensing elements, which would be damaged by the test pressure prescribed in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section may be tested at the maximum allowable working pressure of the system. In addition, all fluid control systems may be tested using the system working fluid.
#### § 35.05-20 Physical condition of crew—TB/ALL.

No person shall be engaged as a member of the crew on a tank vessel if he is known by the employer to be physically or mentally incapable of performing the duties assigned him.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00089

- CV

R OGELIO R EGALADO

, Appellant

V

.

S ECURUS T ECHNOLOGIES

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 271st District Court

of Jack C ounty ( 21

- 11

- 118 )

May 11, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr