alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending April 11, 2009

|Filer                                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|JONAH BANKSHARES                     | * 3A1         | Jonah Bankshares, Casper, Wyoming, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Jonah Bank, Casper, Wyoming.                     | Newspaper:05/01/2009Federal Register:05/01/2009   
|Newspaper:                           | 05/01/2009   
|Federal Register:                    | 05/01/2009   
|UNIVERSITY NATIONAL BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Notice submitted by Martin C. Bicknell, Bucyrus, Kansas, to acquire control of University National Bancshares, Inc., parent of University National Bank, both in Pittsburg, Kansas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/16/2009
|Newspaper:                           | Not available
|Federal Register:                    | 04/16/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 503.48 Policy and services available. Pursuant to policies established by Congress, the Government's costs for services provided to identifiable persons are to be recovered by the payment of fees (Independent Offices Appropriations Act, 31 U.S.C. 9701 and Freedom of Information Reform Act of 1986, October 27, 1986, 5 U.S.C. 552). Except as otherwise noted, it is the general policy of the Commission not to waive or reduce service and filing fees contained in this chapter. In extraordinary situations, the Commission will accept requests for waivers or fee reductions. Such requests are to be made to the Secretary of the Commission at the time of the information request or the filing of documents and must demonstrate that the waiver or reduction of a fee is in the best interest of the public, or that payment of a fee would impose an undue hardship. The Secretary will notify the requestor of the decision to grant or deny the request for waiver or reduction. ( a ) Upon request, the following services are available upon the payment of the fees hereinafter prescribed; except that no fees shall be assessed for search, duplication or review in connection with requests for single copies of materials described in §§ 503.11 and 503.21: ( 1 ) Records/documents search.
( 2 ) Duplication of records/documents.
( 3 ) Review of records/documents.
( 4 ) Certification of copies of records/documents.
( b ) Fees shall also be assessed for the following services provided by the Commission: ( 1 ) Placing one's name, as an interested party, on the mailing list of a docketed proceeding.
( 2 ) Processing nonattorney applications to practice before the Commission.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 13682, Apr. 24, 1987; 59 FR 59170, Nov. 16, 1994; 63 FR 50535, Sept. 22, 1998. Redesignated at 79 FR 24351, Apr. 30, 2014]
# C_2012118EN.01001601.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti Kostituzzjonali (Malta) lodged on 10 February 2012 — Vodafone Malta Limited and Mobisle Communications Limited vs L-Avukat Ġenerali, Il-Kontrollur tad-Dwana, Il-Ministru tal-Finanzi, and L-Awtorità ta’ Malta dwar il-Komunikazzjoni

(Case C-71/12)

2012/C 118/25

Language of the case: Maltese

Referring court

Referring court

Qorti Kostituzzjonali

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Vodafone Malta Limited, Mobisle Communications Limited

Applicants:

Defendants: L-Avukat Ġenerali, Il-Kontrollur tad-Dwana, Il-Ministru tal-Finanzi, L-Awtorità ta’ Malta dwar il-Komunikazzjoni

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Do the provisions of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), and in particular its Articles 12 and/or 13, prohibit the Member States from imposing a fiscal burden on mobile telecommunications operators (‘the operators’) that is:

| (a) | a duty, called an excise duty, introduced through national legislation; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a duty, called an excise duty, introduced through national legislation;

| (b) | calculated as a percentage on the charges levied by mobile telephony operators on their users for the services provided to them by these operators, with the exception of those services exempted by law; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

calculated as a percentage on the charges levied by mobile telephony operators on their users for the services provided to them by these operators, with the exception of those services exempted by law;

| (c) | paid to the mobile telephony operators by their users on an individual basis, and this amount is subsequently passed on to the Comptroller of Customs by all operators offering mobile telephony services, which amount is payable only by the operators and not by other undertakings, including those providing other electronic communications networks and services? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

paid to the mobile telephony operators by their users on an individual basis, and this amount is subsequently passed on to the Comptroller of Customs by all operators offering mobile telephony services, which amount is payable only by the operators and not by other undertakings, including those providing other electronic communications networks and services?

---
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Rimmer, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Rimmer*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 48.]

(No. 98-1092

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Gregory A. White,*Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Lisa A. Locke Graves,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Carl E. Rimmer, pro se.*

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 50.20-25 Calculations. ( a ) Calculations must be forwarded with plans submitted for approval and must clearly substantiate compliance with this subchapter. Care must be taken to identify sources of equations, factors and other information upon which the calculations are based.
( b ) The results of the calculations, such as the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP), test pressure, and safety device settings, must be clearly identified.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 101 (Friday, May 25, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 29427-29428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2654]



[[Page 29425]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2007-19 of May 10, 2007--Unexpected 
Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related to Somalia, Sudan, Chad, 
Other Parts of Africa, and the West Bank and Gaza


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 101 / Friday, May 25, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 29427]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-19 of May 10, 2007

                
Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs 
                Related to Somalia, Sudan, Chad, Other Parts of Africa, 
                and the West Bank and Gaza

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                the laws of the United States, including sections 2 and 
                4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 
                1962 (the ``Act''), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 
                2603) and section 301 of title 3, United States Code:

(1) I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is 
important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, in 
an amount not to exceed $29.5 million from the United States Emergency 
Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting 
unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by 
contributions to international, governmental, and non-governmental 
organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of 
Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to: 
(a) humanitarian needs resulting from conflicts in Somalia, Sudan, and 
Chad, (b) breaks in the food pipeline for refugees in Africa, and in the 
West Bank and Gaza; and

(2) the functions of the President in relation to this memorandum under 
section 2(d) of the Act, and of establishing terms and conditions under 
section 2(c)(1) of the Act, are assigned to you, and you may further assign 
such functions to any of your subordinates.

[[Page 29428]]

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 10, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-2654
Filed 5-24-07; 9:10 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29987-29992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2637]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-30]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)( 1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of

[[Page 29988]]

Representatives, Transmittal 07-30 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: May 22, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY07.004


[[Page 29989]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY07.005


[[Page 29990]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY07.006


[[Page 29991]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY07.007


[[Page 29992]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY07.008

[FR Doc. 07-2637 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
EXHIBIT 11

                    INDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY
                  Computation of Per Share Earnings
              (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                             THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                   JUNE 30,             JUNE 30,
                                2000       1999       2000      1999

INCOME:
  Net income................$  3,457  $   2,712   $  5,815  $  5,155

SHARES:
  Weighted average common
   shares outstanding.......   7,180      7,308      7,180     7,335

BASIC INCOME PER SHARE:
 Net income per share.......$    .48   $    .37   $    .81  $    .70

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (A)
 USE OF PROCEEDS:
  Assumed exercise of
   options..................$  2,750   $  2,427   $  1,434  $  3,341
  Tax benefit from assumed
   exercise of options......     440        664        425       743
  Repurchase of treasury
   stock at the average
   market price per share of
   $11.81, $11.93, $11.67
   and $12.45, respectively.  (3,190)    (3,091)    (1,859)   (4,084)
  Assumed balance to be
   invested.................$      -  $       -   $      -  $      -

SHARES:
 Weighted average shares
  outstanding...............   7,180      7,308      7,180     7,335
 Shares assumed issued
  for options...............     342        367        230       444
 Treasury stock assumed
  purchased.................    (270)      (259)      (159)     (328)
 Adjusted average shares
  outstanding...............   7,252      7,416      7,251     7,451

DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE:
 Net income per share.......$    .48  $     .37   $    .80  $    .69

(A)  Warrants were not assumed to be exercised as the effect would
     have been anti-dilutive.
August 6, 2015

The Honorable Gina McCarthy The Honorable Mark R. Rosekind, PHD

Environmental Protection Agency National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20460 Washington, DC 20590

RE: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and 

Vehicles - Phase 2 Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827 & NHTSA-2014-0132

As a county-wide elected official in one of the largest counties in the nation, I strongly support the EPA’s 

proposal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty trucks. The trucking industry is a vital 

aspect of our economy and crucial to the work done by local governments. My office uses heavy-duty 

trucks to deliver and retrieve election equipment and materials to nearly 1,700 locations each election 

cycle. I want these trucks to be as efficient as possible both because more efficient trucks save taxpayer 

dollars, and also because I want our government to be working aggressively to reduce the greenhouse 

gas emissions that are driving climate change.

As a government official I have already seen the way that climate change will strain government 

resources and create economic instability. Due to heavy flooding in 2013, Cook County and 98 Illinois 

towns and the Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago were sued by Illinois Farmer’s Insurance 

Company for failing to properly update their infrastructure to mitigate the increase in heavy downpours 

that are a result of climate change. While these lawsuits were eventually dropped, this is just one 

example of the way climate change will exacerbate local government’s ability to find enough money to 

meet their communities’ needs. Norfolk Virginia is already struggling with coastal flooding; Alaska is 

engulfed in forest fires; California is struggling to find enough water to keep the state moving forward. 

Government has a role in helping these communities endure and rebuild; government also has a 

responsibility to help limit the greenhouse gases that are driving these problems.

Fortunately, transitioning to a less carbon intensive economy has real economic benefits and this 

proposal is a perfect example. Creating more fuel efficient trucks will save money over the long haul as 

the upfront costs of building better trucks will be quickly recouped by a reduction in fuel costs. In the 

end we will have a more competitive trucking industry, a cleaner environment and a less expensive

election process in Cook County.

Sincerely.

David Orr

Cook County Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gregory T. Barnum, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Computer NetworkTechnology Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.   Date: May 28, 2004   /s/ GREGORY T. BARNUM   Gregory T. Barnum Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                NAME UNDER WHICH SUBSIDIARY
SUBSIDIARIES                        STATE OR JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION               DOES BUSINESS
------------                        --------------------------------------      ---------------------------
<S>                                 <C>                                         <C>
Zila Pharmaceuticals, Inc.          Nevada                                      Zila Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Bio-Dental Technologies             California                                  Bio-Dental Technologies    
 Corporation                                                                     Corporation

Cygnus Imaging, Inc.                Arizona                                     Cygnus Imaging, Inc.

Zila Ltd.                           United Kingdom                              Zila Ltd.

Zila International, Inc.            Arizona                                     Zila International, Inc.

*Ryker Dental of Kentucky, Inc.     Kentucky                                    The Supply House; Zila Dental
                                                                                  Supply

*Integrated Dental Technologies,    California                                  Integrated Dental Technologies,
  Inc.                                                                            Inc.
 
Zila Acquisition Corp.              Arizona                                     Zila Acquisition Corp.

Zila Acquisition Corp.              Delaware                                    Zila Acquisition Corp.

Oxycal Laboratories, Inc.           Arizona                                     Oxycal Laboratories, Inc.

**Inter-Cal Corporation             Arizona                                     Inter-Cal Corp.
  
**Oxycal Exports, Inc.              U.S. Virgin Islands                         Oxycal Exports Inc.
</TABLE>

*  wholly owned subsidiary of Bio Dental Technologies Corporation
** wholly owned subsidiary of Oxycal Laboratories, Inc.
§ 52.01-55 Maximum allowable working pressure. ( a ) The piping system, machinery, and appurtenances must meet the requirements of this subchapter for the boiler maximum allowable working pressure. Only the Commandant may grant an increase in pressure.
( b ) When an existing boiler is replaced by a new boiler designed to operate at pressures in excess of the pressure indicated on the certificate of inspection for the previous boiler, an analysis of the complete system must be made, including machinery and piping, to insure its compatibility with the increased steam pressure. The maximum allowable working pressure on the certificate of inspection must be based on the results of this analysis.