alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-179]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-179

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

   August 1 (legislative day, July 31), 2001.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 217]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 217, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides that it will be in order at any 
time on the legislative day of Wednesday, September 5, 2001, 
for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 
rules. The rule also provides that the Speaker or his designee 
shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the 
designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to the 
resolution.

                                

```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 19, 2008

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Integrity Bancshares, Inc. | 3A1            | Integrity Bancshares, Inc., Camp Hill, PA, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Integrity Bank, Camp Hill, PA. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | Not applicable
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending October 10, 2009

----

EnforcementEurobancshares, Inc., San Juan, Puerto Rico  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.					-Announced, October 6, 2009 					San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield, California  -- issuance of a consent prompt corrective action directive against the bank.					-Announced, October 5, 2009 					Wellington State Bank, Wellington, Texas  -- issuance of a consent order of assesssment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, October 6, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility  -- (1) publication for comment of amendments to Regulation A (Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks) to establish criteria for determining the eligibility of credit rating agencies and their ratings for use in the TALF and (2) enhanced credit review procedures for TALF collateral.					-Announced, October 5, 2009 					Term Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $50 billion in 70-day credit on October 5, 2009.					-Announced, October 5, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: October 15, 2009
<PAGE>   1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
FirstCity Financial Corporation:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Numbers 333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and 333-09485) on Forms S-3
and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated February 12,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FirstCity Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report
appears in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of FirstCity
Financial Corporation.
 
                                            KPMG LLP
 
Fort Worth, Texas
March 31, 1999
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Partners
WAMCO Partnerships:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Numbers 333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623 and
333-09485) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our report dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the combined balance sheets of
the WAMCO Partnerships as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related combined statements of operations, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of FirstCity Financial Corporation. Our
report was unqualified and included an explanation paragraph that described the Company's adoption of Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements, as of December 31,
2006, as discussed in note 2 to the combined financial statements.

KPMG LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 17, 2008

---



QuickLinks
# C_2014448EN.01001701.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 November 2014 — Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) v Commission

(Case T-422/11) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of computer services for software development and maintenance, consultancy and assistance for different types of information technology applications - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Abnormally low tender - Article 139(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Choice of legal basis - Misuse of powers))

(2014/C 448/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) SA (Dommeldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by S. Delaude and D. Calciu, and subsequently by S. Delaude, acting as Agents, assisted by E. Petritsi, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 22 July 2011 not to accept the tenders submitted by the consortium formed by the applicant and another company for Lots Nos 1 and 3 in tendering procedure AO 10340, concerning the provision of computer services for software development and maintenance, consultancy and assistance for different types of information technology (OJ 2011/S 66-106099), and to award the framework contracts to other tenderers.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) SA to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) SA to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT 11

                   INDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY
                Computation of Per Share Earnings
             (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)


                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                MARCH 31,
                                              1999         1998
                                            -------------------
INCOME:
  Net income..............................$  2,443     $  2,491
                                           =======      =======
SHARES:
  Weighted average common
   shares outstanding.....................   7,361        7,430
                                           =======      =======
BASIC INCOME PER SHARE:
  Net income per share....................$    .33     $    .34
                                           =======      =======
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (A)
 USE OF PROCEEDS:
  Assumed exercise of options.............$  2,278     $  2,541
  Tax benefit from assumed exercise of
   options................................     846          823
  Repurchase of treasury stock at the
   average market price per share of
   $12.97 and $13.03, respectively........  (3,124)      (3,364)
                                           -------      -------
  Assumed balance to be invested..........$      -     $      -
                                           =======      =======
 SHARES:
  Weighted average shares outstanding.....   7,361        7,430
  Shares assumed issued for options.......     368          381
  Treasury stock assumed purchased........    (241)        (258)
                                           -------      ------- 
  Adjusted average shares outstanding.....   7,488        7,553
                                           =======      =======
DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE:
 Net income per share.....................$    .33     $    .33
                                           =======      =======  

(A)  Warrants were not assumed to be exercised as the effect
     would have been anti-dilutive.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending August 22, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2009 (October 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 70.01-15 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f) which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| § 71.10 | 1625-0032 |
| § 71.50-5 | 1625-0032 |
| § 78.17-22 | 1625-0064 |
| § 78.17-33 | 1625-0064 |

[49 FR 38120, Sept. 27, 1984, as amended by CGD 88-072, 53 FR 34297, Sept. 6, 1988; CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41822, Sept. 11, 1992; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58347, Sept. 30, 2004]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending July 28, 2007

|Filer                            | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|BLUE RIDGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1          | Blue Ridge Financial Corporation, Walhalla, South Carolina, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of Blue Ridge Bank of Walhalla, Walhalla, South Carolina. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                       | Not available 
|Federal Register:                | Not available 
|TRUPOINT BANK                    | * Branch       | TruPoint Bank, Grundy, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 1320 Governor George C. Perry Highway, Pounding Mill, Virginia.                                       | Newspaper:08/03/2007Federal Register:Not applicable  
|Newspaper:                       | 08/03/2007    
|Federal Register:                | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 110 (Friday, June 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 31807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2882]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:45-2:45 p.m.

Place: RFE/RL Broadcast Center, Room 546, Prague, Czech Republic.

Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

Contact Person for More Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

    Dated: June 5, 2007.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-2882 Filed 6-6-07; 12:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
#### Hampton v. Rider.

(Decided May 20, 1919.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

Appeal and Error — Appeals—Time for Trial — Premature Submission — Practice.'—An appeal granted by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals does not stand for trial until the appellee has been summoned or has entered his appearance, and where a case has been submitted before either of these things has been done, the submission is premature and the order of • submission will be set aside and the case continued.

JOS. SOLINGER and O’NEAL *&*O’NEAL for appellant.

ELMER C. UNDERWOOD for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Setting aside the order of submission and continuing the case.

*335This appeal was granted by the clerk of this court. Appellee was summoned but the process was returned “Not executed.” Though he never entered his appearance and no furthér steps were taken to bring' him before the court, the case was submitted. An appeal granted by the clerk of this court does not stand for trial until the appellee has been summoned or has entered his appearance. Section 753, Civil Code. It follows that the submission was premature.

Wherefore, the order of submission is set aside and the case continued.
# C_2012032EN.01002901.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/29

---

Action brought on 15 November 2011 — Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Lepiarz v OHIM — Henkel (SUPER GLUE)

(Case T-591/11)

2012/C 32/59

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Jarosław Lepiarz Alicja sp. j. (Jaworzno, Republic of Poland) (represented by: M. Konieczyński, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Henkel Corp. (Gulph Mills, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 September 2011 in Case R 1147/2010-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 September 2011 in Case R 1147/2010-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of representation in the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of representation in the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Lepiarz

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative trade mark depicting a tube in the colours white, black, grey and yellow and containing the word element ‘SUPER GLUE’, for goods in Classes 1 and 16 — Community trade mark application No 7 262 405

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Henkel Corp.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark No 377 517‘SUPERGLUE’ registered in Benelux, for goods in Classes 1 and 16

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition partially upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) as regards establishment of the similarity of the trade marks and of the likelihood of confusion on the part of consumers

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---