alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          98,357                  94,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,023                   3,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   200                     867
<PP&E>                                       1,379,078               2,681,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,550,658               2,681,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          260,533                  48,708
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,290,125               2,632,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,550,658               2,681,594
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               873,377                   6,750
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,781                  60,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,760                     724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                781,836                (54,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            781,836                (54,066)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   781,836                (54,066)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 111 (Monday, June 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 32128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting.

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcholism Special Emphasis Panel, Epigenetic Mechanisms in the 
Neurobiology of Alcohol Tolerance and Dependence. (RFA-AA-07-011 & 
AA-07-012).
    Date: July 16, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, RM 3041, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8f8f98978c9ead808c8481c3838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd9d9cec1dac8fbd6dad2d795d5d2d395dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 1, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2872 Filed 6-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.30 Federal Disaster Relief]
[Page 380]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.30  federal disaster relief

  On motion of Mr. EMERSON, by unanimous consent, the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure was discharged from further 
consideration of the following concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 39):

       Whereas catastrophic natural disasters are occurring with 
     greater frequency, a trend that is likely to continue for 
     several decades according to prominent scientists;
       Whereas the Federal Government has responded to disasters 
     by appropriating relief funds, which provide only short-term 
     assistance to victims but long-term burdens to tax-payers; 
     and
       Whereas the increasing reliance on Federal disaster relief 
     has overshadowed the need to perform more comprehensive 
     disaster planning and rely on private insurance for 
     protection against disaster risks: Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that--
       (1) persons who live in areas at high risk to natural 
     disasters should assume more responsibility for their actions 
     by insuring against such risks in order to minimize the 
     rising cost of Federal disaster relief;
       (2) sensible, cost-effective disaster mitigation programs 
     should be encouraged and enhanced at the State and local 
     level;
       (3) insurers should create a privately funded pooling 
     mechanism for the spreading of disaster risk in order to 
     encourage the continued availability and affordability of 
     private insurance in all parts of the Nation; and
       (4) a fundamental overhaul of Federal disaster policies 
     should be undertaken to reduce costs to tax-payers and 
     encourage more effective partnerships between the private 
     sector and government at all levels in anticipation of future 
     catastrophes.

  When said concurrent resolution was considered and agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said concurrent resolution was 
agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
concurrent resolution.
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                      Aura Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                      -----------------------------------
                                        



          Aura Systems, Inc.
          Aura Ceramics, Inc.
          Aura Designs, Ltd.
          Aura Medical Systems, Inc.
          Aura Realty, Inc.
          AuraSound, Inc.
          AuraTech, Inc.
          Audio-MYS Corporation
          Dreamworks Holdings, Ltd.
          Electrotec, Inc.
          Electrotec-AudioLease, Ltd.
          Linaeum Corporation
          MYS America, Inc.
          MYS Corporation
          Mystical Audio, Inc.
          MYS USA, Inc.
          NewCom,. Inc.
          Phillips Sound Labs, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 34015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Monday, June 25, 2007.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 15, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-3053 Filed 6-15-07; 4:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 64.23 Gasket and lining. Each gasket and lining must be made of material that is— ( a ) Chemically compatible with the product for which the tank is approved; and
( b ) Resistant to deterioration from the product for which the tank is approved.
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 10-5, PageID.155 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 10-5, PageID.156 Filed 04/06/15 Page 2 of 2
#### The State ex rel. Smith, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 369.]

(No. 96-1948

Submitted October 12, 1998

Decided January 20, 1999.)

*Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss*and *Scott A. Bravi,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *William J. McDonald,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*370*Michael Matuska,*Assistant City Attorney, for appellee city of Columbus.

*Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy*and *Marc J. Jaffy,*urging reversal for *amici curiae,*Ohio AFL-CIO, Ohio Association of Professional Firefighters, and Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

*Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Robert A. Minor*and *Robin R. Obetz,*urging affirmance for *amici curiae,*Ohio Manufacturers’ Association and Ohio Self-Insurers’ Association.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the relator’s writ of mandamus is granted. This matter is returned to the Industrial Commission to calculate temporary total disability.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
•Argued June 20,

affirmed July 9, 1918.

#### LISENBY *v.*LISENBY.

(173 Pac. 888.)

From Multnomah: George W. Stapleton, Judge.

Department 1.

The plaintiff sued for and was granted a decree of divorce. The defendant was given the custody of the two children, one of whom is now about *á*years of age and the other is now about 2 years of age. The father was directed to pay $30 per month to the mother for the maintenance of the children. The defendant did not ask for any affirmative relief but her answer contained only a general denial and a prayer for the dismissal of the suit. The plaintiff was satisfied with the decree but the defendant appealed.

Afeirmed.

For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by *Mr. Samuel*W. *Stark.*

*274For respondent there was a brief and an oral argument by *Mr. Charles E. Lenon.*

HARRIS, J. —

No useful purpose could possibly be accomplished by a detailed recital of the unhappy conditions which brought about the separation of the plaintiff and defendant. An examination of the record cannot but impress the reader that the plaintiff is a patient husband, kind father and a hard-working man; that the defendant is a good mother and a virtuous woman; and that in all likelihood harmony rather than discord would have prevailed had the parties lived alone and in a home of their own instead of attempting to live under the same roof with relatives, well meaning though they were. The trial court made an earnest attempt to effect a reconciliation. The plaintiff was willing to act upon the court’s suggestions, but when the defendant refused, the court chose the only alternative and granted the plaintiff a decree of divorce. Neither party was allowed costs. It is enough to say that the entire record has been examined and that, on the facts disclosed by the record, the plaintiff was entitled to a decree of divorce. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, but without costs to either party in this court. Aeeirmed.

McBride, C. J., Bean and Burnett, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending August 15, 2009

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                  
|---------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|ALCAR LLC              | * 3A1          | Alcar, LLC, New York, New York, to become a bank holding company by acquiring at least 90 percent of the voting shares, or otherwise control, of Darien Rowayton Bank, Darien, Connecticut, pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of BHC Act and Section 225.15 of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:08/31/2009Federal Register:09/08/2009        
|Newspaper:             | 08/31/2009    
|Federal Register:      | 09/08/2009    
|CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL | Investment     | CLS Bank International, New York, New York, requests specific consent pursuant to Section 211.9(g) of Regulation K, to make an investment in CLS Aggregation Services LLC, a joint venture that is 51 percent owned by CLS Bank International.                         | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | Not applicable
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending April 24, 2010

----

Testimony and Statements            Lehman Brothers -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on Financial Services on the lessons from the failure of Lehman Brothers.            -Published, April 20, 2010            Regulations and Policies            Home Mortgage Disclosure -- to hold four public hearings on potential revisions to Regulation C, which implements the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta on July 15; the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on August 5; the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago on September 16; and the Board in Washington, D.C. on September 24, 2010.            -Announced, April 23, 2010            Enforcement            Ameri-National Corporation, Overland Park, Kansas -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.            -Announced, April 20, 2010                        The Bank of Currituck, Moyock, North Carolina -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks.            -Announced, April 22, 2010                        First National Financial Services, Inc., Elk River, Minnesota -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.            -Announced, April 19, 2010                        Heritage Bank, Topeka, Kansas -- prompt corrective action directive dated March 26, 2009, terminated April 13, 2010.            -Announced, April 21, 2010                        PB Financial Group, Inc., Denver, Colorado, and Premier Bank -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order by the Board and the Colorado Division of Banking.            -Announced, April 22, 2010            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### CHARLES STRATER, Jr., AND CHARLES PETERSON, PROSECUTORS, v. THE BOROUGH OF RUNNEMEDE AND THE POLICE COMMISSION OF THE BOROUGH OF RUNNEMEDE, ETC., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided November 7, 1929.

Before Justices Teen chard, Lloyd and Case.

Eor the prosecutors, *Carl Kisselman.*

Eor the respondent borough of Runnemede, *T. Harry Rowland.*

Eor the respondent police commission of the borough of Runnemede, *Walter S. Keown.*

*988Per Curiam.

The prosecutors of this rule were dismissed from their positions as police officers in the borough of Eunnemede and 'the present rule requires the borough to show cause why its-action therein should not be reviewed by *certiorari.*

Examination of the evidence taken on the rule seems to establish that as to Peterson the writ should be denied, but-granted as -to the prosecutor Strater.

Prom the proofs it appears that the officers were directed by the mayor of Eunnemede to proceed to Haddonfield for the identification of a prisoner, and while so proceeding across the White Horse pike the borough car in which they were riding was struck by another car and badly damaged. The-proofs further established that the car was being driven by Peterson at a high rate of speed without warning of its approach to the crossing. The charge against the prosecutors-was “gross negligence and willful destruction of borough property, to wit, one borough automobile.”

We think the charge as against Peterson was amply sustained and that he was properly dismissed. To drive an automobile at night across the White Horse pike, the chief artery of travel between Philadelphia and Camden and Atlantic City, at high speed and without warning, constituted the grossest negligence and exhibited unfitness to hold the office of policeman.

Peterson, being the driver of the car, was properly dismissed. Strater, however, was a passive occupant of the car in nowise responsible for its operation. There is exhibited in the case against him no evidence of negligence, willful, gross or otherwise. As our view is that the dismissal of Strater was illegal he should be restored to duty. The evidence upon the merits having been fully taken under the rule the formal issuance of the writ as to him may become unnecessary. If otherwise, the rule will be made absolute in his case. The rule granted as to Peterson will be discharged.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 21, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2009 (April 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 56.25-5 Flanges.

Each flange must conform to the design requirements of either the applicable standards of table 2 to § 56.60-1, or of those of Appendix 2 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2). Plate flanges must meet the requirements of § 56.30-10(b)(5). Flanges may be integral or may be attached to pipe by threading, welding, brazing, or other means within the applicable standards specified in table 2 to § 56.60-1.

[CGD 77-140, 54 FR 40605, Oct. 2, 1989, as amended by USCG-2002-13058, 67 FR 61278, Sept. 30, 2002; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]