alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11185-11186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04231]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee; 
Meeting

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE), on February 17, 2015, 
published a notice of open meeting announcing an open meeting of the 
Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee. Due to 
member's availability, the meeting venue has been changed to a webinar 
and the date and time is now March 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m.-

[[Page 11186]]

5:30 p.m. As a result, the language is being corrected in this notice.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of February 17, 2015, in FR DOC. 2015-
03133, on page 8298, please make the following corrections:
    In the DATES heading, third column, second and third lines, replace 
text with ``Thursday, March 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m. (EDT).
    In the ADDRESSES heading, third column, fourth line, please remove 
``Marriott Wardman Park, 2660 Woodley Rd. NW., Washington, DC 20008'' 
and replace with ``Please register for the Biomass Research and 
Development Technical Advisory Committee meeting for March 5, 2015, 
1:30 p.m. at: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/6807084548871333889. After registering, you will receive a confirmation 
email containing information about joining the webinar.''

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 24, 2015.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-04231 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 7.5 Rules for establishing boundary lines. ( a ) For application of the Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Radiotelephone Act, 33 U.S.C. 1201 *et seq.,* the line is 12 nautical miles seaward of the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured.
( b ) Barges of 100 gross tons and over operating on the sheltered waters of British Columbia as defined in the United States-Canada treaty of 1933 (49 Stat. 2685, TS 869) are not required to be inspected as seagoing barges under 46 U.S.C. 3301.
( c ) Except as otherwise described in this part, Boundary Lines are lines drawn following the general trend of the seaward, highwater shorelines and lines continuing the general trend of the seaward, highwater shorelines across entrances to small bays, inlets and rivers.
[CGD 81-058, 50 FR 25230, June 18, 1985, as amended by USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42602, July 18, 2003]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 19, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 503.74 Procedures for closing a portion or portions of a meeting or a portion or portions of a series of meetings on agency initiated requests. ( a ) Any member of the agency, the Managing Director or the General Counsel of the agency may request that any portion or portions of a series of meetings be closed to public observation for any of the reasons provided in § 503.73 by submitting such request in writing to the Secretary of the agency in sufficient time to allow the Secretary to schedule a timely vote on the request pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Upon receipt of any request made under paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary of the agency shall schedule a time at which the members of the agency shall vote upon the request, which vote shall take place not later then eight (8) days prior to the scheduled meeting of the agency.
( c ) At the time the Secretary schedules a time for an agency vote as described in paragraph (b) of this section, he or she shall forward the request to the General Counsel of the agency who shall act upon such request as provided in § 503.77.
( d ) At the time schedule d by the Secretary as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the members of the agency, upon consideration of the request submitted under paragraph (a) of this section and consideration of the certified opinion of the General Counsel of the agency provided to the members under § 503.77, shall vote upon that request. That vote shall determine whether or not any portion or portions of a meeting may be closed to public observation for any of the reasons provided in § 503.73, and whether or not the public interest requires that the portion or portions of the meeting or meetings remain open, notwithstanding the applicability of any of the reasons provided in § 503.73 permitting the closing of any meeting to public observation.
( e ) In the case of a vote on a request under this section to close to public observation a portion or portions of a meeting, no such portion or portions of any meeting may be closed unless, by a vote on the issues described in paragraph (d) of this section, a majority of the entire membership of the agency shall vote to close such portion or portions of a meeting by recorded vote.
( f ) In the case of a vote on a request under this section to close to public observation a portion or portions of a series of meetings as defined in § 503.71, no such portion or portions of a series of meetings may be closed unless, by a vote on the issues described in paragraph (d) of this section, a majority of the entire membership of the agency shall vote to close such portion or portions of a series of meetings. A determination to close to public observation a portion or portions of a series of meetings may be accomplished by a single vote on each of the issues described in paragraph (d) of this section, provided that the vote of each member of the agency shall be recorded and the vote shall be cast by each member and not by proxy vote.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 55 FR 38330, Sept. 18, 1990]
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: December 5, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: December 5, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# National Archives andRecords Administration Office a/the Federal Register

MA'l 1 1 2007 Ms. Nancy Molitor Regulations Division (AGe-200) Office ofthe Chief Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Ms. Molitor: The matenallisled inthe attachment is approved fOrlocorporalion byreference in 14CFR Part 39. This approval IS contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date ofyour final rule. Ifyau wish to enforce some other edition ofthe pubhcation(s) approved, you must: 1. Publish notice ofthe change inthe Federal Register, and amend the Code ofFederal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that acopy ofthat edition IS on file atthe Office ofthe Federal Register; and 3. Notify me in writing ofthe change. Sincerely, 

## 'JtVt;vJ;" [N1/>0 f~YMONDA MOSLEY Director ofthe Federal Register Federal Register 

## Attomey:cz;t: Attachment

u.s. mail address: 8601 Adr.lphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001

Officc location: 800North Capitol Stt~et, NW, Suitc 700,WaBhington, DC 20002-4244 Federal Registcr web sites: http:/ jwwv•... archives,govjfederal-register and http:/ jw·ww.gpoaccess.gov! naraIncorporatioll byReference Docket No. FAA-2005-22288; Directorate Idemifier 2005-NM-132-AD; Amdr. 39-/5050; AD 2007-10-09
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2660 dated November 16. 2006 Docker No. FAA-2006-24696; DireClOrateIdemifier 2006-NM-038-AD; Amdt. 39-/5052; AD 2007-10-11

EMBRAER EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-28- 0028 Service Bulletin 145LEG-28-0030 dated November 7. 2005 dated April 19, 2006 Docket No. FAA-2007-2 7531; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-020-AD; Amdt. 39-15054; AD 2007-10-13
Apex Aircraft

Prillted jj] li2007 Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 040401 dated October 29, 2004

Page] of]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

Southern Division 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

QINGPING LIU and XIUPING XI, ) Case No. 2:15-cv-12123-GCS-APP 

 ) Hon. George Caram Steeh 

 Plaintiffs, ) Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

METRO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, ) 

and METRO PROPERTY GROUP, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

 The defendants, Metro Property Management, LLC, and Metro Property 

Group, LLC, have failed to appear, plead or otherwise defend in this action, and 

defaults were entered on August 25, 2015, and the Plaintiffs having filed a motion 

and supporting affidavit in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55; 

 A default judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiffs, Qingping Liu and 

Xiuping Xi, and against defendants, Metro Property Management, LLC, and 

2:15-cv-12123-GCS-APP Doc # 13 Filed 11/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 37
Metro Property Group, LLC in the amount of $93,067.00 plus interest on the 

judgment at the legal rate until the judgment is satisfied. 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

United States District Judge 

 

Dated: November 25, 2015 

2:15-cv-12123-GCS-APP Doc # 13 Filed 11/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 38
§ 501.13 Delegation to the Secretary. ( a ) Authority to approve applications for permission to practice before the Commission and to issue admission certificates to approved applicants.
( b ) Authority to extend the time to file exceptions or replies to exceptions, and the time for Commission review, relative to initial decisions of administrative law judges and decisions of Special Dockets Officers.
( c ) Authority to extend the time to file appeals or replies to appeals, and the time for Commission review, relative to dismissals of proceedings, in whole or in part, issued by administrative law judges.
( d ) Authority to establish and extend or reduce the time: ( 1 ) To file documents either in docketed proceedings or relative to petitions filed under part 502 of this chapter, which are pending before the Commission itself; and
( 2 ) To issue initial and final decisions under § 502.61 of this chapter.
( e ) Authority to prescribe a time limit for the submission of written comments with reference to agreements filed pursuant to 46 U.S.C. chapter 403.
( f ) Authority, in appropriate cases, to publish in the Federal Register notices of intent to prepare an environmental assessment and notices of finding of no significant impact.
( g ) Authority to prescribe a time limit less than ten days from the date published in the Federal Register for filing comments on notices of intent to prepare an environmental assessment and notice of finding of no significant impact and authority to prepare environmental assessments of no significant impact.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2014

No. 04-13-00911-CR

Terry Larance JACKSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10320

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 24, 2014, appellant’s attorney filed a “Motion for Leave to Withdraw as 

Appellate Counsel Due to a Conflict of Interest and Motion to Abate Appellate Deadline.” The 

appeal concerns a murder conviction. Counsel asserts that a conflict arises from the fact that 

both counsel and the personnel of the Bexar County Medical Examiner’s Office and Bexar 

County Crime Lab are employed by the very same county department: Judicial Services. 

Counsel asserts that both the Appellate Public Defender’s Office and the Bexar County Medical 

Examiner’s Office/Bexar County Crime Lab are under the “supervision” of the Judicial Services 

Director. In support of his motion, counsel cites to Rule 1.06 of the Disciplinary Rules. See

TEX. DISCIPLINARY RULES PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.06(b), reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN., 

tit. 2, subtit. G, app. A (West 2013). Rule 1.06 provides:

[A] lawyer shall not represent a person if the representation of that person:

(1) involves a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are 

materially and directly adverse to the interests of another client of the lawyer or 

the lawyer’s firm; or

(2) reasonably appears to be or become adversely limited by the lawyer’s or law 

firm’s responsibilities to another client or to a third person or by the lawyer’s or 

law firm’s own interests.

Based on the motion presented, counsel has not demonstrated that a conflict exists in this 

situation. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      32.1**




***Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer***





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. 1350)





In
      connection with the quarterly report of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and


2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                May 12, 2008By
            /s/
                L.S. SmithL.S.
                Smith, Chairman of the Board,Chief
                Executive Officer and Secretary





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
      separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 77 DB 202 2 (No. 34 RST 2022)

:

LAURA LOUISE COOK : Attorney Registration No. 316814

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of July

, 202 2 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinar y Board Member dated July 7 , 2022

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

LAURA LOUISE COOK

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that he has

the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the
                  President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Henry R. Carabelli certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
6. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
7. disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
8. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
9. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
10. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have  a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting



Date:  May 12, 2004

/s/ Henry R. Carabelli

_______________________________

Henry R. Carabelli

President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 15, 1995 (66), Para 66.3 After Recess--12:00 Noon]
[Page 699]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.66.3  after recess--12:00 noon

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FUNDERBURK, called the House to order.
```
#### Penniman *v.*Jones *& a.*

The provision of G. L., c. 228, s. 14, that no party shall he compelled to disclose the names of his witnesses, nor the manner of proving his case, does not excuse him from testifying to all he knows about the matter in issue.

Bill in Equity, for a settlement of partnership accounts. Facts found by a referee. The defendant, Jones, was called to the stand by the plaintiffs, and asked whether he had various conversations with them in relation to the subject-matter of this suit, — -if so, when, where, and what; whether he charged the firm greater sums than were due him, — if so, when, for what, and how much; whether he performed services for others than the firm, for which he received pay, — if so, when and what; and what price he paid for certain articles, and how much he charged the firm for them. Jones declined to answer, on the ground that his answers would tend to disclose the manner in which he proposed to prove his own case.

*Wadleigh $ Wallace*and *Burns,*for the plaintiff.

*Stevens Parker,*for Jones.

Bingham, J.

No party can be compelled, in testifying, to disclose the names of the witnesses by whom, or the manner in which, he proposes to prove his own case. G. L., *c.*228, *s. 14.*This provision, when first enacted, applied only to the taking of depositions. Laws of 1858, *c.*2090, *s.*1.” It was then construed not to excuse a party from testifying to what he knows about the matters in issue. *Eaton*v. *Farmer,*46 N. H. 200. The questions which Jones declined to answer called for material facts, apparently within his personal knowledge, and capable of being proved by his own testimony, without an infringement of his asserted privilege, and he should have answered. On this conclusion it is not necessary to consider whether the statute limits the examination of parties in chancery.

*Case discharged.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.