alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CATHERINE ANN SKINNER,

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-12368

v. Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, David R. Grand

United States Magistrate Judge

Defendant.

_______________________/

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 15);

(2) GRANTING THE COMMISSIONER’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12);

(3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 11); and

(4) AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

On December 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and

Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)

in this action challenging the Commissioner’s final decision to deny Plaintiff’s application for

Disability Insurance Benefits. (ECF No. 15, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed the

Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and

E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11), GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (ECF No. 12), and AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 19, 2017

2:15-cv-12368-PDB-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 01/19/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 786
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 19, 2017.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-12368-PDB-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 01/19/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 787
#### § 550.401 Who may file.

Any person who has been harmed by, or who can reasonably expect harm from, existing or impending conditions unfavorable to shipping in the foreign trade of the United States, may file a petition for relief under the provisions of this part.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending September 16, 2006

----

Bank Holding CompaniesFirst National Bank Group, Inc., Edinburg, Texas  -- to acquire up to 9.9 percent of the shares of Southside Bancshares, Inc., Tyler.					-Approved, September 11, 2006 					Glacier Bancorp, Inc., Kalispell, Montana  -- to acquire Citizens Development Company, Billings, and its five subsidiary banks.					-Approved, September 14, 2006 					Passumpsic Bancorp, St. Johnsbury, Vermont  -- to merge with The Siwooganock Holding Company, Inc., Lancaster, New Hampshire, and acquire its subsidiary bank, The Siwooganock Bank, and its ownership interest in The Lancaster National Bank.					-Approved, September 14, 2006 					

EnforcementExchange Bank of Missouri, Fayette, Missouri  -- written agreement with the Missouri Division of Finance and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.					-Announced, September 11, 2006 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend without revision the Reporting and Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation P (Privacy of Consumer Financial Information) (Reg P).					-Approved, September 11, 2006 					

Testimony And StatementsBasel II and Commercial Real Estate  -- statement by Governor Bies before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit of the House Committee on Financial Services.					-Published, September 14, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: September 21, 2006
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4361 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4362 Filed 02/07/23 Page 2 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4363 Filed 02/07/23 Page 3 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4364 Filed 02/07/23 Page 4 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4365 Filed 02/07/23 Page 5 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4366 Filed 02/07/23 Page 6 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4367 Filed 02/07/23 Page 7 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4368 Filed 02/07/23 Page 8 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4369 Filed 02/07/23 Page 9 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4370 Filed 02/07/23 Page 10 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4371 Filed 02/07/23 Page 11 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4372 Filed 02/07/23 Page 12 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4373 Filed 02/07/23 Page 13 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4374 Filed 02/07/23 Page 14 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4375 Filed 02/07/23 Page 15 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4376 Filed 02/07/23 Page 16 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4377 Filed 02/07/23 Page 17 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4378 Filed 02/07/23 Page 18 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4379 Filed 02/07/23 Page 19 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4380 Filed 02/07/23 Page 20 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4381 Filed 02/07/23 Page 21 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4382 Filed 02/07/23 Page 22 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4383 Filed 02/07/23 Page 23 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4384 Filed 02/07/23 Page 24 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4385 Filed 02/07/23 Page 25 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4386 Filed 02/07/23 Page 26 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4387 Filed 02/07/23 Page 27 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4388 Filed 02/07/23 Page 28 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4389 Filed 02/07/23 Page 29 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4390 Filed 02/07/23 Page 30 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4391 Filed 02/07/23 Page 31 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4392 Filed 02/07/23 Page 32 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4393 Filed 02/07/23 Page 33 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4394 Filed 02/07/23 Page 34 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4395 Filed 02/07/23 Page 35 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4396 Filed 02/07/23 Page 36 of 37
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 264, PageID.4397 Filed 02/07/23 Page 37 of 37
#### The State ex rel. Morris, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Morris v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 114.]

(No. 98-745

Submitted October 12, 1998

Decided December 9, 1998.)

*Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*115
      *Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *C. Bradley Howenstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
    Interlink Electronics, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 11, 1999 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement No. 33-60380. It should be noted that we
have not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December
31, 1998 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                       Arthur Andersen LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 29, 1999
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
 AGREEMENT TO FURNISH DEBT INSTRUMENTS 
 Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of
Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Criteo S.A. (the “Company”) has not included as an exhibit to its registration statement on Form F-1 any instrument with respect to long-term debt if the
total amount of debt authorized by such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. 

 

	
	Criteo S.A.
	
	 /s/ Jean-Baptiste Rudelle

	Jean-Baptiste Rudelle
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	September 27, 2013
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Jurisdiction
                                                                    ------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
eVentures Holdings, LLC                                              Delaware
eVentures Latin America, Inc.                                        Delaware
AxisTel Communications, Inc.                                         Delaware
            Novo Networks Global Services, Inc.                      Delaware
            Novo Networks International Services, Inc.               Delaware
            Novo Networks Metro Services, Inc.                       Delaware
Novo Networks Operating Corp.                                        Delaware
e.Volve Technology Group, Inc.                                       Nevada
Internet Global Services, Inc                                        Texas
            Internet Streaming Video, Inc.                           Texas
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1588 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1588

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the treatment of 
        livestock sold on account of weather-related conditions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 1995

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the treatment of 
        livestock sold on account of weather-related conditions.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF LIVESTOCK SOLD ON ACCOUNT OF WEATHER-RELATED 
              CONDITIONS.

    (a) Deferral of Income Inclusion.--Subsection (e) of section 451 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for 
proceeds from livestock sold on account of drought) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``drought'' conditions, and that these 
        drought conditions'' in paragraph (1) and inserting ``drought, 
        flood, or other weather-related conditions, and that such 
        conditions''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, Flood, or Other Weather-Related 
        Conditions'' after ``Drought'' in the subsection heading.
    (b) Involuntary Conversions.--Subsection (e) of section 1033 of 
such Code (relating to livestock sold on account of drought) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, flood, or other weather-related 
        conditions'' before the period at the end thereof; and
            (2) by inserting ``, Flood, or Other Weather-Related 
        Conditions'' after ``Drought'' in the subsection heading.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales and exchanges after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2002                          /s/ Jeffery Strickland
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Jeffery Strickland
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C.ss.1350
and not for any other purpose.


                                       20
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Clinton, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Clinton*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 40.]

(No. 98-1395

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Kevin J. Baxter,*Erie County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Mary Ann Barylski,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that Ervin Clinton is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


REGIONAL AGENCY COOPERATION SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT


 


 


Party A: Grand Smooth Inc Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Party
A)


Party B: JC Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as
Party B)


 


 


This is due to the outbreak of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
in 2020. The epidemic is severe and spread to the whole world. The severe economic recession affects all levels, resulting in delays
in the business development of fish farm project. It also disrupted the original company's layout and expansion plan. After friendly
consultations between the two parties, some content changes were made to the agency authorization fee, and the following agreement
was reached as a supplementary contract. The remaining conditions are still based on the original contract (signed version on September
20, 2019), and both parties shall abide by them.


 


Article 1: Agency authorization


 


1. According to the original contract, Party B should pay the second
$1 million agency authorization fee to Party A before June 1, 2020. However, due to the COVID-19 epidemic, the two parties agreed
to defer the $1 million agency authorization fee of 2020 to 2021 after the agreement. And the remaining three USD 1 million agency
authorization payments are also deferred as follows:


 


a) The second payment of USD 1 million shall be paid before June
1, 2021


b) The third payment of USD 1 million shall be paid before June
1, 2022;


c) The fourth payment of USD 1 million shall be paid before June
1, 2023;


d) The final payment of USD 1 million shall be paid before June
1, 2024.


 


Article 2: Two copies of the supplementary contract of the agency
cooperation agreement in the region, signed and sealed by both parties to take effect, collected by Party A and Party B separately.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




    	1 



    	 



    

 


Party A: Grand Smooth Inc Ltd


Signature of person in charge: Yin-Chieh Cheng


Company number: 2128119


Phone: +85269985418


Address: Room B, 6th Floor, TEDA Commercial Building, 87 Wing Lok
Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong


 


 


Party B: JC Development Co., Ltd.


Signature of person in charge: Feng-Yeh Cheng


Unified Number: 54836040


Phone: +886226511568


Address: 3rd Floor, No. 8, Alley 3, Lane 214, Section 4, Chenggong
Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan


 


 


 


 


 


 




    	2 



    	 



    

 






    	3 



    	 



    





    	4
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40181

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MANUEL FLORES-OCHOA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-781-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Manuel FloresOchoa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Flores-Ochoa has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
# C_2014175EN.01001001.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Ehrmann AG v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV

(Case C-609/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer information and protection - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Nutrition and health claims made on foods - Labelling and presentation of those foods - Article 10(2) - Temporal application - Article 28(5) and (6) - Transitional measures))

2014/C 175/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ehrmann AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 10(1) and (2), 28(5) and 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 116/2010 of 9 February 2010 (OJ 2010 L 37, p. 16) — Health claims — Specific conditions — Temporal application

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 116/2010 of 9 February 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that the obligations to provide information laid down in Article 10(2) of that regulation were already in force in 2010 as regards health claims that were not prohibited on the basis of Article 10(1), read in conjunction with Article 28(5) and (6) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**49 KA 14-01058**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL HAND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

VALERIE G. GARDNER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PENN YAN (LORA J. TRYON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Yates County Court (W. Patrick Falvey, J.), rendered April 1, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted rape in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.35 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that the record establishes that County Court “conducted an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” ( People v Davis , 129 AD3d 1613, 1613, lv denied 26 NY3d 966 [internal quotation marks omitted]), and that “defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” ( People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256). Contrary to defendant’s further contentions, his “ ‘monosyllabic affirmative responses to questioning by [the c]ourt do not render his [waiver] unknowing and involuntary’ ” ( People v Harris , 94 AD3d 1484, 1485, lv denied 19 NY3d 961), and the court “was not required to specify during the colloquy which specific claims survive the waiver of the right to appeal” ( People v Rodriguez , 93 AD3d 1334, 1335, lv denied 19 NY3d 966; see People v Kosty , 122 AD3d 1408, 1408, lv denied 24 NY3d 1220). Defendant’s contention that “his plea was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary ‘because he did not recite the underlying facts of the crime but simply replied to [the c]ourt’s questions with monosyllabic responses is actually a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution,’ which is encompassed by the valid waiver of the right to appeal” ( People v Simcoe , 74 AD3d 1858, 1859, lv denied 15 NY3d 778). Finally, defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal**-2- 49 KA 14-01058** 
encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see Davis
, 129 AD3d at 1615; see generally Lopez , 6 NY3d at 255-256).

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court