EXHIBIT B 

 

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.15 Page 1 of 17
From: matthew finston matthew.finston@yahoo.com

Subject: MMJ.TODAY

Date: May 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM

To: Christoffersent@gmail.com

In regards to your latest article,

This is a request to remove my name and any reference to my name from your website MMJ.TODAY that you claim association with. You and

your website have made false statements about me. You have falsely called me a criminal and a fraud. I have not been convicted of any crime

nor have committed any crime. A website that you have stated partial ownership of has claimed otherwise. The statements were made with

complete disregard of the truth. and had you asked seeking alpha whether or not my statements violated any disclosure rules you would have

found that they have not.

This is “defamation per se."

Defamation Per Se

Slander per se consists of any one of the following:

Statement charging an individual with a serious crime; Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429, 435 (1992).

Libel per se consists of

“[a]ny written or printed article . . . if it tends to expose the plaintiff to public contempt, ridicule, aversion or disgrace, or induce an evil opinion of

him in the minds of right-thinking persons, and to deprive him of their friendly intercourse in society.”Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.,

42 N.Y.2d 369, 379 (1977)

In your article, you claim that my statements are evidence of criminal stock bashing. Not only did I confirm with Seeking Alpha that I have

committed no wrong doing, another shareholder went ahead and first asked the SEC whether or not I have broken any laws.

". Each and every one of Finston’s articles published false information with the intent to damage and devalue

the Company’s stock price."

I emailed the managing editor at seeking alpha the following:

"I never shorted FITX but I did state publicly that it would have been nice if I could. Have I violated

any of Seeking Alpha’s disclosure rules? I didn’t think it was wrong to state a desire to make money

as it was clear the stock would inevitably lose in value.

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 8:35:09 PM 42438 Post # of 175204 

I am the same Matt Finston that said "I want to short FITX." I called my brokerage and tried shorting it

at .067, well before I wrote that most recent article on the company. Sadly, my brokerage said that to

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.16 Page 2 of 17
short just 4,000 shares, I had to put up $10,000 for the margin. 4,000 shares? You mean lock-up

$10,000 just to short $268, where my maximum profit would be $268? Yeah, I would love to short

FITX. Just not worth locking up $10,000.

Now If I could have shorted $10,000 worth of FITX at .067, that would've been nice. I could have

taken home $3800 in profit. But $101.84? I'll pass.

Any ideas on how to short this without the crazy margin requirements? Looking at interactive brokers.

any others?

I don’t understand why shareholders are making such a big deal about it. Perhaps they are unable to

separate wanting to profit from a stock’s change in value versus holding a grudge against the

company?"

Seeking alpha responded with the following:

No. That exceeds any requirement we have. You had no position and said so. I'd like to go long

10,000 shares of Apple, but I don't have the capital to do so. Saying that's my goal indicates my

bullishness on the company though, which is more valuable to readers.

In sum, you're good.

Thanks,

GBM

George B. Moriarty

Managing Editor, Opinion & Analysis

Seeking Alpha"

MMJ.TODAY has committed libel with the following. This is 100% false.

". Each and every one of Finston’s articles published false information with the intent to damage and devalue the Company’s stock price.”----

You claim the following "

"Matt Finston has engaged in obvious and admitted fraudulent conduct and willful misrepresentations with the

intent to manipulate the price of FITX and cause a loss of value to shareholder’s stock – as sellers or

purchasers. His fraudulent conduct satisfies all of the elements (identified above) necessary to constitute a

Rule 10b-5 violation. "

This is what the SEC wrote in response to a shareholder with a similar concern:

RE: Recent complaint by one Matthew Finston regarding CEN Biotech

Paggi, Terry A. (PaggiT@SEC.GOV)

Add to contacts

5/05/15

[Keep this message at the top of your inbox]

PaggiT@SEC.GOV

Opinions provided on internet blogs falls under the First Amendment of Free Speech. Where the line can be crossed is when someone uses a

media to their benefit in securities trading. An example would be if someone held many shares of a stock and spread a rumor online that

would cause others to buy the stock and drive the price up and the person would then sell the stock at the inflated price.

Also, Mr. Finston posting email communication that I sent him is not a violation of any laws. If you have any questions, please feel free to

contact me.

Regards,

__________________________________________________________________________________

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.17 Page 3 of 17
cid:image001.jpg@01CB7CFD.95FF0780

Terry A. Paggi, CFE, CAMS

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Enforcement

Chicago Regional Office

175 W. Jackson Blvd.

Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60604

'Tel: 312.353.1050

*E-mail: paggit@sec.gov

" Unbelievably, although we will not show the name and contact information for this SEC agent, Finston

actually published the name and personal contact info of this agent as well as showing screen shots of the

actual emails. Conduct that certainly violates SEC internal procedure. “

and as the SEC states:

"Mr. Finston posting email communication that I sent him is not a violation of any laws. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact

me."

And this laughable but also defamatory statement:

The article has also altered numerous statements that complete change the meaning. According to Masson v. New Yorker

Magazine, Inc. falsely attributing a statement is defamatory.

The article states: "On yet another occasion Finston states the following about FITX, “I’ll bash them all on

fb, twtr, I’ll write their names on the doors of ___________ if I have to. F—k these guys”.’

No. It wasn’t. It was quoting the following https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRq8lMXoAxE

I have publicly clarified this quote numerously yet it continues to be misquoted in order to ruin my character. This demonstrates gross

negligence of the truth and malicious intent.

The article has caused enough damage that Brady Farrell posted the following statement:

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.18 Page 4 of 17
Anyone who has read this article has now come to associate me with criminal activity.

This is a request to please cease and desist publishing defamatory statements about my person. As you have stated publicly that

MMJ.TODAY was your website, or at least you have shared ownership, that tells me you are taking responsibility for the statements that have

been published. This is the last time I will send an email to you, Taylor Christoffersen, directly. The next time you will hear from me will be

through an attorney. And the address on file is 1356 155Th, Olathe, KS 66062.

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.19 Page 5 of 17
From: matthew finston matthew.finston@yahoo.com

Subject: For your information

Date: May 25, 2015 at 3:32 AM

To: Editor@mmj.today

Cc: samcary777@gmail.com

The following has been posted on your website since May 10th. A similar email was sent to samcary777@gmail.com.

This is not a ‘final warning’ because you have already received that. This is for your records as well as to let you know that I will be filing a

lawsuit.

This is a request to remove my name and any reference to my name from your website MMJ.TODAY. You

and your website have made false statements about me. You have falsely called me a criminal and a fraud.

I have not been convicted of any crime nor have committed any crime. The statements were made with

complete disregard of the truth. and had you asked seeking alpha whether or not my statements violated

any disclosure rules you would have found that they have not. 

This is “defamation per se."

Defamation Per Se

Slander per se consists of any one of the following:

Statement charging an individual with a serious crime; Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429, 435 (1992).

Libel per se consists of

“[a]ny written or printed article . . . if it tends to expose the plaintif to public contempt, ridicule, aversion

or disgrace, or induce an evil opinion of him in the minds of right-thinking persons, and to deprive him of

their friendly intercourse in society.”Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 42 N.Y.2d 369, 379 (1977)

In your article, you claim that my statements are evidence of criminal stock bashing. Not only did I confirm

with Seeking Alpha that I have committed no wrong doing, another shareholder went ahead and first asked

the SEC whether or not I have broken any laws.

MMJ.TODAY States:

". Each and every one of Finston’s articles published false information with the intent to damage and

devalue the Company’s stock price."

I emailed the managing editor at seeking alpha the following:

"I never shorted FITX but I did state publicly that it would have been nice if I could. Have I violated any of

Seeking Alpha’s disclosure rules? I didn’t think it was wrong to state a desire to make money as it was clear

the stock would inevitably lose in value. 

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 8:35:09 PM 42438 Post # of 175204 

I am the same Matt Finston that said "I want to short FITX." I called my brokerage and tried shorting it at

.067, well before I wrote that most recent article on the company. Sadly, my brokerage said that to short

just 4,000 shares, I had to put up $10,000 for the margin. 4,000 shares? You mean lock-up $10,000 just

to short $268, where my maximum profit would be $268? Yeah, I would love to short FITX. Just not worth

locking up $10,000. 

Now If I could have shorted $10,000 worth of FITX at .067, that would've been nice. I could have taken

home $3800 in profit. But $101.84? I'll pass. 

Any ideas on how to short this without the crazy margin requirements? Looking at interactive brokers. any

others? 

I don’t understand why shareholders are making such a big deal about it. Perhaps they are unable to

separate wanting to profit from a stock’s change in value versus holding a grudge against the company?"

Seeking alpha responded with the following:

No. That exceeds any requirement we have. You had no position and said so. I'd like to go long 10,000

shares of Apple, but I don't have the capital to do so. Saying that's my goal indicates my bullishness on the

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.20 Page 6 of 17
shares of Apple, but I don't have the capital to do so. Saying that's my goal indicates my bullishness on the

company though, which is more valuable to readers. 

In sum, you're good. 

Thanks,

GBM

George B. Moriarty

Managing Editor, Opinion & Analysis

Seeking Alpha"

This demonstrates that MMJ.TODAY has grossly erred by stating the following 100% false statement:

". Each and every one of Finston’s articles published false information with the intent to damage and

devalue the Company’s stock price.”----

The article further falsely claims the following:

"Matt Finston has engaged in obvious and admitted fraudulent conduct and willful misrepresentations with

the intent to manipulate the price of FITX and cause a loss of value to shareholder’s stock – as sellers or

purchasers. His fraudulent conduct satisfies all of the elements (identified above) necessary to constitute a

Rule 10b-5 violation. "

This is what the SEC wrote in response to a shareholder with a similar concern: 

RE: Recent complaint by one Matthew Finston regarding CEN Biotech

Paggi, Terry A. (PaggiT@SEC.GOV)

Add to contacts

5/05/15

[Keep this message at the top of your inbox]

PaggiT@SEC.GOV

Opinions provided on internet blogs falls under the First Amendment of Free Speech. Where the line can be

crossed is when someone uses a media to their benefit in securities trading. An example would be if

someone held many shares of a stock and spread a rumor online that would cause others to buy the stock

and drive the price up and the person would then sell the stock at the inflated price.

Also, Mr. Finston posting email communication that I sent him is not a violation of any laws. If you have

any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

__________________________________________________________________________________

cid:image001.jpg@01CB7CFD.95FF0780

Terry A. Paggi, CFE, CAMS

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Enforcement

Chicago Regional Ofce

175 W. Jackson Blvd.

Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60604

'Tel: 312.353.1050

*E-mail: paggit@sec.gov

" Unbelievably, although we will not show the name and contact information for this SEC agent, Finston

actually published the name and personal contact info of this agent as well as showing screen shots of the

actual emails. Conduct that certainly violates SEC internal procedure. “

and as the SEC states:

"Mr. Finston posting email communication that I sent him is not a violation of any laws. If you have any

questions, please feel free to contact me."

And this laughable but also defamatory statement:

The article has also altered numerous statements that complete change the meaning. According to Masson

v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. falsely attributing a statement is defamatory.

The article states: "On yet another occasion Finston states the following about FITX, “I’ll bash them all on

fb, twtr, I’ll write their names on the doors of ___________ if I have to. F—k these guys”.’

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.21 Page 7 of 17
fb, twtr, I’ll write their names on the doors of ___________ if I have to. F—k these guys”.’

No. It wasn’t. It was quoting the following film https://www.youtube.com/watch?

The statement was directed at Chris Parry, Wolf of Weed St, and Matt Finston. It was a quote. And you have

skewed the interpretation of it even though I have made clear on numerous occasions that you have

grossly misconstrued the statements. 

Even though I have publicly clarified this quote numerously yet it continues to be misquoted in order to

ruin my character. This demonstrates gross negligence of the truth and malicious intent. 

The article has caused enough damage that Brady Farrell posted that my name and 

"Criminal is trending #2 on Bing!" 

Anyone who has read this article has now come to associate me with criminal activity.

You have falsely and maliciously called me a fraud. You have made numerous false statement that have

caused irreparable damage. These false statements were made with gross neglect of the truth in hopes of

destroying me, my name, and my future. They have brought harm to my family and has impinged on our

ability to make a living. 

I have proven with clear and indisputable evidence that your article makes numerous false claims of facts

and I will seek damages. The longer this is up, the greater the damage. 

I see no other resolution to this other than legal action.

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.22 Page 8 of 17
•

Matt Finston · NYU Gallatin School of Individualized Study

This is a request to remove my name and any reference to my name from your website 

MMJ.TODAY. You and your website have made false statements about me. You have falsely called 

me a criminal and a fraud. I have not been convicted of any crime nor have committed any crime. 

The statements were made with complete disregard of the truth. and had you asked seeking alpha 

whether or not my statements violated any disclosure rules you would have found that they have 

not.

This is “defamation per se."

Defamation Per Se

Slander per se consists of any one of the following:

Statement charging an individual with a serious crime; Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429, 435 

(1992).

Libel per se consists of

“[a]ny written or printed article . . . if it tends to expose the plaintiff to public contempt, ridicule, 

aversion or disgrace, or induce an evil opinion of him in the minds of right-thinking persons, and 

to deprive him of their friendly intercourse in society.”Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 42 

N.Y.2d 369, 379 (1977)

In your article, you claim that my statements are evidence of criminal stock bashing. Not only did I 

confirm with Seeking Alpha that I have committed no wrong doing, another shareholder went 

ahead and first asked the SEC whether or not I have broken any laws.

MMJ.TODAY States:

". Each and every one of Finston’s articles published false information with the intent to damage 

and devalue the Company’s stock price."

I emailed the managing editor at seeking alpha the following:

"I never shorted FITX but I did state publicly that it would have been nice if I could. Have I violated 

any of Seeking Alpha’s disclosure rules? I didn’t think it was wrong to state a desire to make 

money as it was clear the stock would inevitably lose in value.

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 8:35:09 PM 42438 Post # of 175204

I am the same Matt Finston that said "I want to short FITX." I called my brokerage and tried 

shorting it at .067, well before I wrote that most recent article on the company. Sadly, my 

brokerage said that to short just 4,000 shares, I had to put up $10,000 for the margin. 4,000 

shares? You mean lock-up $10,000 just to short $268, where my maximum profit would be $268? 

Yeah, I would love to short FITX. Just not worth locking up $10,000.

Now If I could have shorted $10,000 worth of FITX at .067, that would've been nice. I could have 

taken home $3800 in profit. But $101.84? I'll pass.

Any ideas on how to short this without the crazy margin requirements? Looking at interactive 

brokers. any others?

I don’t understand why shareholders are making such a big deal about it. Perhaps they are unable 

to separate wanting to profit from a stock’s change in value versus holding a grudge against the 

company?"

Seeking alpha responded with the following:

No. That exceeds any requirement we have. You had no position and said so. I'd like to go long 

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.23 Page 9 of 17
10,000 shares of Apple, but I don't have the capital to do so. Saying that's my goal indicates my 

bullishness on the company though, which is more valuable to readers.

In sum, you're good.

Thanks,

GBM

George B. Moriarty

Managing Editor, Opinion & Analysis

Seeking Alpha"

This demonstrates that MMJ.TODAY has grossly erred by stating the following 100% false 

statement:

". Each and every one of Finston’s articles published false information with the intent to damage 

and devalue the Company’s stock price.”----

The article further falsely claims the following:

"Matt Finston has engaged in obvious and admitted fraudulent conduct and willful 

misrepresentations with the intent to manipulate the price of FITX and cause a loss of value to 

shareholder’s stock – as sellers or purchasers. His fraudulent conduct satisfies all of the elements 

(identified above) necessary to constitute a Rule 10b-5 violation. "

This is what the SEC wrote in response to a shareholder with a similar concern:

RE: Recent complaint by one Matthew Finston regarding CEN Biotech

Paggi, Terry A. (PaggiT@SEC.GOV)

Add to contacts

5/05/15

[Keep this message at the top of your inbox]

PaggiT@SEC.GOV

Opinions provided on internet blogs falls under the First Amendment of Free Speech. Where the 

line can be crossed is when someone uses a media to their benefit in securities trading. An 

example would be if someone held many shares of a stock and spread a rumor online that would 

cause others to buy the stock and drive the price up and the person would then sell the stock at 

the inflated price.

Also, Mr. Finston posting email communication that I sent him is not a violation of any laws. If you 

have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

__________________________________________________________________________________

cid:image001.jpg@01CB7CFD.95FF0780

Terry A. Paggi, CFE, CAMS

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Enforcement

Chicago Regional Office

175 W. Jackson Blvd.

Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60604

'Tel: 312.353.1050

*E-mail: paggit@sec.gov

" Unbelievably, although we will not show the name and contact information for this SEC agent, 

Finston actually published the name and personal contact info of this agent as well as showing 

screen shots of the actual emails. Conduct that certainly violates SEC internal procedure. “

and as the SEC states:

"Mr. Finston posting email communication that I sent him is not a violation of any laws. If you have 

any questions, please feel free to contact me."

And this laughable but also defamatory statement:

The article has also altered numerous statements that complete change the meaning. According to 

Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. falsely attributing a statement is defamatory.

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.24 Page 10 of 17
The article states: "On yet another occasion Finston states the following about FITX, “I’ll bash them 

all on fb, twtr, I’ll write their names on the doors of ___________ if I have to. F—k these guys”.’

No. It wasn’t. It was quoting the following film https://www.youtube.com/watch?

The statement was directed at Chris Parry, Wolf of Weed St, and Matt Finston. It was a quote. And 

you have skewed the interpretation of it even though I have made clear on numerous occasions 

that you have grossly misconstrued the statements.

Even though I have publicly clarified this quote numerously yet it continues to be misquoted in 

order to ruin my character. This demonstrates gross negligence of the truth and malicious intent.

The article has caused enough damage that Brady Farrell posted that my name and

"Criminal is trending #2 on Bing!"

Anyone who has read this article has now come to associate me with criminal activity.

You have falsely and maliciously called me a fraud. You have made numerous false statement that 

have caused irreparable damage. These false statements were made with gross neglect of the 

truth in hopes of destroying me, my name, and my future. They have brought harm to my family 

and has impinged on our ability to make a living.

I have proven with clear and indisputable evidence that your article makes numerous false claims 

of facts and I will seek damages. The longer this is up, the greater the damage.

I see no other resolution to this other than legal action.

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 10 at 10:16am

o

Matt Finston · NYU Gallatin School of Individualized Study

so you didn't see this^^^^^???

Reply · Like · 1 · May 17 at 7:33am

•

Chris Warner · Northern Illinois University

And personally I appreciate people like Finston for shedding light and DD on corrupt companies!

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 10 at 8:01am

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.25 Page 11 of 17
•

Heyam C.Farrell · HFCC

Finston can't take a taste of his own Medicine !!

Karma is a Bitch isn't it Finston !!!!

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 9 at 10:40pm

•

Brian Kaufmann

Let's hope the shareholders voices will finally be heard!

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 9:16pm

•

Brady Farrell · Top Commenter · Phoenix, Arizona

Matt Finston and criminal is trending #2 on Bing!!

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 11:29pm

•

Robert Young · Follow · Works at Retired and having a ball.

Look at him run for the bathroom to CHANGE HIS UNDERWEAR

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 8:05pm

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.26 Page 12 of 17
•

Genghis Hill · Everything at Everywhere

This is good info. DoorMatt is done.

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 8:51pm

•

Ericstevenc Sven Cantares · Follow · Works at Self-Employed

Tawdry escepades sorry

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 10:05pm

•

Ericstevenc Sven Cantares · Follow · Works at Self-Employed

Never does it again......

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 9:19pm

•

Joey Strickland · Wingate University

Someone is in trouble.

Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · May 8 at 7:57pm

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.27 Page 13 of 17
•

Susan Barbee · Top Commenter · Owner at Self-Employed

Paulo Pincaro ,You seem to be at least somewhat objective. And I appreciate that.!

I have to ask you, Is this really your view on what has gone on with Cen Biotech? you made this 

comment.

"To me, it's pretty obvious that instead of actually seeking real answers for why the FITX grounds 

were never brought up to code in order to be re inspected and licensed, a bunch of naive 

investors have essentially started looking for the boogeyman. But guess what? Even if Matt is 

indicted (wouldn't it be considered libel to suggest that when you have no evidence of such an 

outcome forthcoming???), you still have to ask why months after the initial inspection, Bill didn't 

simply bring the building to code to satisfy the requirements as outlined in HC's initial evaluation. 

You still have no answers as to why during the last three months you ... See More

Reply · Like · Follow Post · Edited · May 11 at 10:55am

o

Susan Barbee · Top Commenter · Owner at Self-Employed

From The FAQ .

WHY WAS THE PRE-LICENSE INSPECTION REPORT MADE PUBLIC?

A known shareholder to the company did a Freedom of Information Act request, and received 

from the Privacy Commissioner under the Authority from Health Canada, the full inspection 

report. So as to not allow this shareholder sensitive inside information, CEN Biotech, Inc. 

immediately released the inspection report per their legal obligations to the SEC.

The press release states clearly: “As CEN Biotech Inc. continues in its effort to be transparent, it 

releases its Health Canada Pre-License inspection report.” The report can be viewed HERE. - The 

press release can be found HERE.

To address your concern around our inspection report being released; that report was never 

provided to us after inspection by Health Canada. A shareholder filed a Freedom of Informa... See 

More

Reply · Like · May 11 at 10:59am

•

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.28 Page 14 of 17
James Smiley

I guess the bashers dumped 9,000,000 shares in the final hour and caused the pps to decrease 

11%. Maybe not, insiders are making a nice profit on recently unrestricted shares.

Reply · Like · Follow Post · May 14 at 9:45pm

•

Paulo Pincaro · Follow · Top Commenter · Stock Broker at First Colonial Group

Few problems.

1: you have failed to prove anything he said was false

2: if there was an actual valid claim to be made, why would FITX not take any actual legal steps

3: people short and make their opinions all the time, just ask Bill Ackman... If we're at a point of 

completely disregarding first amendment rights, I think we've hit rock bottom. But as I said, there 

are many prominent cases of people shorting and making it public. The Soros pound short also 

comes to mind. There is nothing fraudulent about that any more than saying you're going long a 

stock and posting a positive opinion or fact.

To me, it's pretty obvious that instead of actually seeking real answers for why the FITX grounds 

were never brought up to code in order to be re inspected and licensed, a bunch of naive 

investors have essentially started looking for th... See More

Reply · Like · Follow Post · May 8 at 9:28pm

o

Paulo Pincaro · Follow · Top Commenter · Stock Broker at First Colonial Group

Ok I stand corrected there is a doc against the minister of health...

Reply · Like · 1 · May 8 at 9:34pm

o

Susan Barbee · Top Commenter · Owner at Self-Employed

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.29 Page 15 of 17
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/creative-edge-nutrition-inc-zoning-172646503.html

The Building was absolutely "up to Code" ZOning and the preinspection.

we would like to release the fact that Health Canada, as a result of their pre-license inspection on 

July 31, 2014 did state they were satisfied with our facility and were, in their words, "...the 

applicant (CEN BioTech Inc.) will be ready and able to meet the requirements of the MMPR 

provided the deficiencies addressed during the inspection debrief meeting were addressed...". We 

are happy to report to our shareholders that those deficiencies were immediately addressed and 

ask for your continued patience as Health Canada assesses that information given the tremendous 

workload they currently have with the vast array of applicants currently before them.

Nice to see you jump on board to Alan.!

Reply · Like · 1 · May 8 at 10:09pm

o

Paulo Pincaro · Follow · Top Commenter · Stock Broker at First Colonial Group

That's one way not to disprove anything I said. And for the record, I think Alan is an idiot (see: 

growlife). Stop being naive, start accepting the con job. If you were building a company in Canada, 

would you use the little excess capital you have to buy an apartment in Manhattan? If you cared 

for your shareholders, would you make up a story about having purchase orders from GNC and 

only PR that it fell through after it got blown up on twitter? This is not a company worth trusting, 

period. I think it's hilarious people are still even discussing it and haven't moved on. You say 

claims were false but can't point to a single one. What does that tell you?

Reply · Like · May 9 at 6:35am

View 2 more

•

Joe Pannu · Top Commenter · UC Davis

Its a investment... i dont think any person made money on these stocks other then people that 

were permoting lemons. Im not saying all companies are bad but 99.9% otc is pump and dump 

IMHO. IF you loss money in otc (OF THE COUNTER) PLEASE dont blame anyone but youself.

Reply · Like · Follow Post · May 10 at 6:41pm

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.30 Page 16 of 17
•

Chris Warner · Northern Illinois University

FITX is still moving? I thought it was dead. What do thy have going for it now that Health Canada 

shot it down? Sorry but it looks like all the "bashers" were right about this bs company!

Reply · Like · Follow Post · May 10 at 7:59am

•

Brady Farrell · Top Commenter · Phoenix, Arizona

Fantastic way to illustrate the potential criminal behavior by this punk. I warned him a long time 

ago as did many others, this is the big leagues not a classroom. Oh and Alan please go p*ss on 

the CEN property so you will be arrested for trespassing.

Reply · Like · Follow Post · May 8 at 10:52pm

Case 2:15-cv-12013-AJT-DRG ECF No. 1-3 filed 06/04/15 PageID.31 Page 17 of 17