alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 502.602 Definitions. For the purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Assessment* means the imposition of a civil penalty by order of the Commission after a formal docketed proceeding.
( b ) *Commission* means the Federal Maritime Commission.
( c ) *Compromise* means the process whereby a civil penalty for a violation is agreed upon by the respondent and the Commission outside of a formal, docketed proceeding.
( d ) *Mitigation* means the reduction, in whole or in part, of the amount of a civil penalty.
( e ) *Person* includes individuals, corporations, partnerships, and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of the United States or of a foreign country.
( f ) *Respondent* means any person charged with a violation.
( g ) *Settlement* means the process whereby a civil penalty or other disposition of the case for a violation is agreed to in a formal, docketed proceeding instituted by order of the Commission.
( h ) *Violation* includes any violation of sections 19(f)(4), 19(g)(4) and 19(k) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. 42104(a), 42104(d), and 42108); any provision of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. 40101-41310); sections 2 and 3 of Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 44101-44106); and/or any order, rule or regulation (except for procedural rules and regulations contained in this part) issued or made by the Commission in the exercise of its powers, duties and functions under the Merchant Marine Act, 1920, the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended, or Public Law 89-777.
( i ) Words in the plural form shall include the singular and vice versa; and words importing the masculine gender shall include the feminine and vice versa. The terms “includes” and “including” do not exclude matters not listed but which are in the same general class. The word “and” includes “or”, except where specifically stated or where the context requires otherwise. [Rule 602.]
[49 FR 44418, Nov. 6, 1984. Redesignated at 58 FR 27211, May 7, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 7812, Feb. 17, 1999; 74 FR 50717, Oct. 1, 2009; 88 FR 16574, Mar. 20, 2023]
#### Thomas Cresap et al. v. The State.

*No. 6685.*

*Decided May 24.*

Indictment—Bail Bond—“Illegal Marking and Branding” of animals is not *eo nomine*an offense against the laws of this State, and am indictment to charge the offense as properly defined, or a bail or appearance bond to be valid under such a charge, must allege the constituent elements of the offense, to-wit, that the accused marked and branded any of the animals enumerated in the statute, the same “not being his own, and without the consent of the owner, and with intent to defraud.” The bail bond in this case described the offense as “illegally marking and branding one head of neat cattle.” *Held,*insufficient.

Appeal from the District Court of Kerr. Tried below before Hon. T. M. Paschal.

The opinion discloses the nature of the case. The amount of the bond ' and judgment was S300.

*Burney & Burnett,*for appellants.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

“Illegal marking and branding” is not an offense *eo*nomine-under our Code. The elements constituting such an offense are that the person shall mark and brand any of the enumerated animals, the animals “not being his own, and without the consent of the owner, and with intent to defraud.” Penal Code, art. 759.

An indictment under this article to be sufficient must allege these elements (The State v. Hall, 27 Texas, 333), and these allegations must he proved. Fossett v. The State, 11 Texas Ct. App., 40. An appearance or bail bond to answer an indictment charging this offense must also contain a description of the offense by its essential elements, since there is no offense of the kind *eo nomine.*Where an offense is not so defined, then it must be described by stating its essential elements so- that it will appear that a particular offense against the law is charged against the principal. Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 1794.

The bail bond which was forfeited in this case described the offense of which the principal stood charged as “illegally marking and branding one head of neat cattle.” It did not state the offense charged in the indictment, nor any offense under our law, and therefore no legal liability could attach under it.

The judgment is set aside, and because no legal forfeiture can be had upon said bond, a further prosecution of the case is dismissed. .

*Reversed and*dismissed.

Judges all present and concurring.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 17, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 56.80-5 Bending (modifies 129).

Pipe may be bent by any hot or cold method and to any radius that will result in a bend surface free of cracks, as determined by a method of inspection specified in the design, and substantially free of buckles. Such bends must meet the design requirements of 102.4.5 and 104.2.1 of ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2). This does not prohibit the use of bends designed as creased or corrugated. If doubt exists as to the wall thickness being adequate, Class I piping having diameters exceeding 4 inches must be nondestructively examined by the use of ultrasonics or other acceptable method. The nondestructive method must be employed where the design temperature exceeds 750 °F.

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9979, June 17, 1970; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65185, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 172.048 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*MARPOL 73/38* means the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating to that Convention.

[USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55574, Nov. 2, 2001]
-82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/04

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.50 N 76.81 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

★ ■

■ ■ ■

★

●

●

★ ●

● ● ●
§ 350.5 Replacement decorations. The following decorations that have been previously issued may be replaced at cost upon written request made to the Office of Maritime Labor, Training and Safety: ( a ) Distinguished Service Medal.
( b ) Meritorious Service Medal.
( c ) Mariner's Medal.
( d ) Gallant Ship Unit Citation Bar.
( e ) Presidential Testimonial Letter (no cost for replacement).
Re: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 

2007-0531-0677) 5 attachments 

David Brooks to: Paul Campanella 11/27/2012 10:34 AM

Cc: John Schaeffer, Kathy Calvo, Marcus Aguilar, Mark Townsend

Hi Paul,

Attached is our contractor's report. The acute fish and Daphnia studies are adequate to satisfy the C1 

test rule requirement. We have reviewed this report and it is acceptable. 

68479-98-1_Final HPV2 DA_11.05.2012.docx

The following data gap remains for test rule-required endpoints: reproductive toxicity (i.e., 

prenatal developmental toxicity) and developmental toxicity . We have agreed to waive the 

requirement for reproductive toxicity testing (see pages 2, 129 and 130) , provided that 

Albemarle Corporation and Lonza Inc supply an adequate prenatal developmental toxicity test as 

specified by OPPTS 870.3700.

Dave

David Brooks

Risk Assessment Division (7403M)

High Production Volume Chemical Branch

EPA East Room 6308N

(202) 564-8603

Paul Campanella David, Please submit the attached documents fo... 09/06/2012 12:32:39 PM

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US

To: David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US

Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US, Kathy 

Calvo/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/06/2012 12:32 PM

Subject: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 2007-0531-0677) 5 

attachments

David, Please submit the attached documents for review. Thanks

[attachment "Albemarle C1 48hr Acute Daphnia.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] 

[attachment "Albemarle C1 96hr Static Acute Fathead.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] 

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C.

202-564-8091
### p. 1 CBICControl Number 

# ARI~EMA OPPT-2006-0621 

# 356788
" Scanned&Processedin CIS by: PAULA David A. Kreh Global Supply Chain Director ^' 0 Fluoropolymers 4, O n 

## October 30, 2013 OPPT Document Control Office (DCO) Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0621 1201 Constitution Ave NW EPAEast Building Room6428 Washington, DC 20004 W 

## -n N



## Re: Arkema Inc

. 2012 update reporting for EPA 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program Dear Sir or Madame, Arkema Inc. herewith submits its 2012 update report on emissions and product content as part of EPA's 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program . Arkema is continuing to work to reduce emissions and product content of perfluorinated compounds consistent with the Stewardship Program . O z, 'C7 r, 'L4 n --tr7-n 

### GUM c~ ©



## This submission contains confidential business information and should be handled accordingly. S~ince~rely , DavidA . Kreh Global Supply Chain Director Fluoropolymers david.kreh(~r)arkema.com 610-205-7548



# COMPANY SANITIZED

Arkema Inc

. 9001" Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Tel . : 610-205-7548 david.kreh@arkema.com www .arkema.comC~S



## 0 

# ~ . a
y

V O a 

### O 

# 0 N 

## C 0 

# U V 

## 0 e^



## O

.~ ,~I~~yyyW



## 4-4 

# 0

0 

# a
0 U M_

0 N N ° U 

# 0

F 

## A 

# a

O F 

## U W 

## z u UD 0 

# Z Z Z 4~ 4~ > 0 . -cod

Ps CL 0 Q 0 tn 00 C) o CD 0 I:L~ I ~ I 

# Z m C~ 40

. CD CD

CD o 48 A A 

### 0 up + CD mu Cd

CD CD 2 w CL

z a co CD C) CD C) kf) W) Q 

### A cn CD 0 4 - I'd CD m rA 0 z 0 Cod R ;Lq 

# z
zcd

cr ej 7 El od 9 > 0 0 40, 48 . 0
rA 041 en m mm 7 ,.^ ~ + .pq 009 

### a' ;, ai °' ~ ~ 3 d d d ~ o 

# z ~.~' z z z 

# z on
o

. F H O F.
N p N 

### a p 

### a ° q 

### cu

x ~a 

### -~ O ~ p 

### w '" c °O "I0

3 ~ 5, " ^~ O O 

### c`' o ~ 0 3 N ' ~ ~ " ~ O a ~ ~` Q , O N ~' .. 

### . . O 

### ,-: a ~ A a a. o `~t ° b O j p p 

## c ° ° ° ° N 

## n n 

# x " p p p ey q F+ N

~ q, p

C F 4 

# a z z z ° z 2 TTT

i 

### p~ N 

### ~ C



### s, 3 Q4



### p "F~ O 7 Q $ Jp cN3

44 O w b 

## U ~ n 

## O ~ ° ~a

~

###  V N

° ° N 

### o p ~7y ~, y 

## ti ~ ~ 

## aw y



## o .

## ° obo d o ~ "'obo

~ o ~ ;.c ;~ °w ° o w°w b o i: o 

## o a U a ~a a w~ .a a. ~

,_, r~7 v~ O o p~ G' p o v,

o 

### i " 1 

### ~ m v 

# b b 5 , 

## O a ~ c ~ w a

° ~'

~ U 

## z

O V 

## a . O V~' V I O 'F ,0 o 

### ° .9 I ° q " O Frl 

# _o o~

~ 

# V U .I7 WJw 

# " q~ U °o

v 

# F ° °~ O °° ° o 

# U N 0 .5 

# O o 

# o ~~ z
'O k u 

### .k i ~o ~'q b y ~ "0 ~ 

# ~°e _q 0 eA ° a T '°yC e°'9 

# W 

# O"~° J' ~"-' N 0 

# r 'o o O . y M d " .U, N " ,}j ~ y U

~ e0 r. ~ b ~ p "~'v 

## ¢ ~ ° b .~ ~. o~'" . .N ..o $ .~ 3 o a q ~ a~ ~y ,b, ~ X'~ c a, d d d 0

~ ` . . o ~ o ~ w w w 

### " `°oC'° °' ~,°~a Qo w ~a ~e ~ x x

a~ v v m 

### a E n ,a° a-a'ovv ,~' v' U 7 7 7 ?



### 0 0 0 ~S. .F°, ,Y 3 N N N " ° y o w° Y ~ C o ~ a a O . O q q 'F > > > 04 .4 O C

.U

~ F_F,F w~ o U o

.~O > T
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CARMEN JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 15-12482 

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

STEPHANIE DAWKINS DAVIS

 / 

JUDGMENT 

All issues having been resolved by the Court’s Order [74] of January 22, 

2018, THIS CASE IS CLOSED. 

 Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 22nd day of January 2018. 

 

 DAVID J. WEAVER 

 CLERK OF THE COURT 

 BY: s/Michael E. Lang 

 Deputy Clerk 

 

Approved: 

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2:15-cv-12482-AJT-SDD Doc # 75 Filed 01/22/18 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 1794
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Craig Johnson, Vice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.            the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.            the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|   |   | /s/ Craig Johnson                                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Craig Johnson                                                    |
|   |   | Vice President,  Finance, Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary |
|   |   | (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer)                    |

November 14, 2007

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

“This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.”

 

----
#### § 401.640 Record for decision.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76353, Sept. 17, 2024.

The transcript of testimony and oral argument at the hearing, together with any exhibits received, shall be made part of the record for decision, and the record shall be available to the respondent or applicant on payment of costs thereof.

[29 FR 11595, Aug. 13, 1964. Redesignated at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, June 29, 1998]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 6, 2009

|Filer                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PINNACLE BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3         | Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc., Rogers, Arkansas, to acquire 100 percent of Central Bank, Little Rock, Arkansas.                                        | Newspaper:07/01/2009Federal Register:07/06/2009   
|Newspaper:                | 07/01/2009   
|Federal Register:         | 07/06/2009   
|SBW BANCSHARES, INC.      | * 3A1         | SBW Bancshares, Inc., Waterloo, Illinois, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of State Bank of Waterloo, Waterloo, Illinois. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/06/2009
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 07/06/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending March 28, 2009

|Filer                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK                       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 4400 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas.                                         | Newspaper:04/01/2009Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:                        | 04/01/2009    
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable
|ARVEST BANK                       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1102 North Massey Boulevard, Nixa, Missouri.                                      | Newspaper:04/09/2009Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:                        | 04/09/2009    
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable
|SOUTHERN BANCORP BANK OF ARKANSAS | * 18C* Branch  | Southern Bancorp Bank of Arkansas, Arkadelphia, Arkansas, to merge with Timberland Bank, El Dorado, Arkansas, and to retain the acquired facilities as branch offices. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00439

- CR

Bruce Lee KITTELSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas
Trial Court No. 18

- 2753

- CR

- C
Honorable Jessica Crawford , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED July 3, 2024.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Partners
Acquisition Partnerships:


              We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 and S-3 of First City Financial Corporation of our report
dated February 14, 1995, relating to the combined balance sheets of Acquisition
Partnerships as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related combined
statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report
appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K/A No. 2 of FirstCity
Finncial Corporation.


                                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Fort Worth, Texas
May 9, 1997
#### § 58.50-15 Alternate material for construction of independent fuel tanks.

Materials other than those specifically listed in table 1 to § 58.50-5(a)(2) and in table 1 to § 58.50-10(a)(2) may be used for fuel tank construction only if the tank design meets material and testing requirements approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG). Approved testing may be accomplished by any acceptable laboratory, or may be done by the fabricator if witnessed by a marine inspector.
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 The
undersigned officers of Green Builders, Inc., a Texas corporation (the
“Company”), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge:
  1.           The
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB /A of the Company
for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
  /s/ Clark
      WilsonClark
      WilsonPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerJanuary
      28, 2009
   /s/ Cindy
      HammesCindy
      HammesPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJanuary
      28, 2009
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.