alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

					                                                

CERTIFICATION

I, Teresa A. Herbert, certify that: 

    1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independence Holding Company; 

    2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

    5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/*Teresa A. Herbert*	

Teresa A. Herbert

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
 

Date:
 

November 13, 2003
§ 7.125 Point Vincente, CA to Point Conception, CA. ( a ) A line drawn from Redondo Beach East Jetty Light “2” to Redondo Beach West Jetty Light “3”.
( b ) A line drawn from Marina Del Rey Light “4” to Marina Del Rey Breakwater South Light “1”. A line drawn from Marina Del Rey Breakwater North Light “2” to Marina Del Rey Light “3”.
( c ) A line drawn from Port Hueneme East Jetty Light “4” to Port Hueneme West Jetty Light “3”.
( d ) A line drawn from Channel Islands Harbor South Jetty Light “2” to Channel Islands Harbor Breakwater South Light “1”. A line drawn from Channel Islands Harbor Breakwater North Light to Channel Islands Harbor North Jetty Light “5”.
( e ) A line drawn from Ventura Marina South Jetty Light “6” to Ventura Marina Breakwater South Light “3”. A line drawn from Ventura Marina Breakwater North Light to Ventura Marina North Jetty Light “7”.
( f ) A line drawn from Santa Barbara Harbor Light “4” to latitude 34°24.1′ N. longitude 119°40.7′ W. (Santa Barbara Harbor Lighted Bell Buoy “1”); thence to Santa Barbara Harbor Breakwater Light.
#### Cincinnati Bar Association *v.*Roemer.

[Cite as *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Roemer*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 373.]

(No. 98-1794

Submitted October 28, 1998

Decided January 13, 1999.)

*375
      *Anita S. Cross*and *James J. Condit,*for relator.

*Douglas A. Roemer, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s neglect of his clients’ interests, his failure to promptly return unearned retainers, and his disregard of the disciplinary investigation warrant an indefinite suspension from the practice of law in Ohio. Cf. *Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 100, 694 N.E.2d 899; *Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Daniels*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 5, 693 N.E.2d 764. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with his reinstatement conditioned upon his making full restitution with interest at the judgment rate to Stull and Knepp of the retainers he received. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 4, 2009

|Filer                                   | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., THE | * 4c8       | Application by The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to acquire up to the lesser of $75 million or 5.4 percent of the common shares of First Niagara Financial Group, Lockport, New York (a thrift holding company), pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act | Newspaper:07/26/2009Federal Register:07/27/2009
|Newspaper:                              | 07/26/2009 
|Federal Register:                       | 07/27/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location         | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------ | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|MADISON BK, RICHMOND, KENTUCKY | 2552099 | 02/02/2009 | 06/18/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

Plaintiff, Criminal No. 15-20145 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

MICHAEL RAY GLESEN, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER TO SEAL 

The government having moved to seal Exhibit A and B to the Government's 

Notice of Filing Exhibits from Hearing and the Court being duly advised in the 

premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Exhibit A and B to the Government's 

Notice of Filing Exhibits from Hearing be sealed until further Order of the Court. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 24, 2021 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on March 24, 2021, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764 

Case 2:15-cr-20145-MFL-APP ECF No. 84, PageID.1552 Filed 03/24/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 67.215 Date and time of filing. ( a ) An instrument is deemed filed at the actual date and time at which the instrument is received by the National Vessel Documentation Center, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section. Any materials submitted to supplement an instrument after the instrument is filed are deemed part of the original filing and relate back to the date and time of that filing.
( b ) If filing of an instrument is subject to termination in accordance with § 67.217(a) and a new instrument is filed as a substitute for the original instrument, the filing of the original instrument will be terminated in accordance with § 67.217(c) and the substitute instrument will be considered a new filing. The substitute instrument will be deemed filed at the actual time and date it is received by the National Vessel Documentation Center.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993; 58 FR 65131, Dec. 13, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31605, June 15, 1995]
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interlink Electronics, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 033-93066,333-39371, 333-53870 and 333-107174) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-112034) on Form S-3 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of InterlinkElectronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

May 3, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending January 24, 2009

----

Bank Holding CompaniesBB&T Corporation, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and Branch Banking and Trust Company  -- request for an exemption from section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W to allow Branch Banking and Trust Company's securities affiliate, Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., Richmond, Virginia, to hold and receive payments on certain instruments that are backed by a liquidity facility provided by the bank and to allow the bank to purchase these instruments from the securities affiliate.					-Granted, January 8, 2009 					(AC)

Banks, State MemberThe Northern Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois  -- request for an exemption from section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W to purchase auction-rate securities from its parent company, Northern Trust Corporation, Chicago.					-Granted, January 9, 2009 					(AC)

EnforcementFirst Company, Cody, Wyoming  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.					-Announced, January 21, 2009 					

Regulations And PoliciesHomeownership Preservation Policy  -- establishment of a policy under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to require that, in the event of default of a discount window loan collateralized by residential mortgage assets, the Federal Reserve Banks take actions to prevent avoidable foreclosures in connection with such assets through sustainable loan modifications and other actions that are consistent with the Federal Reserve's obligation to maximize the net present value of the assets for the benefit of taxpayers, and voluntary application of the policy to the residential mortgage assets held by Maiden Lane LLC; Maiden Lane II, LLC; and Maiden Lane III, LLC.					-Approved, January 23, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: January 29, 2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 3, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|EAGLE B&TC, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS    | 123440 | 06/01/2009 | 09/03/2009     | S         | Small Bank 
|HEARTLAND CMNTY BK, BRYANT, ARKANSAS | 155777 | 06/08/2009 | 09/14/2009     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 16, 1995 (46), Para 46.6 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations]
[Page 394]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.46.6  emergency supplemental appropriations

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LINDER, pursuant to House Resolution 115 
and rule XXIII, declared the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
additional disaster assistance and making recissions for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.
  Mr. BEREUTER, Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, resumed the 
chair; and after some time spent therein,
```
Exhibit 15.1





May 17, 2010





American Medical Alert Corp.


Oceanside, New York





We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
unaudited interim financial information of
American Medical Alert Corp. and Subsidiaries for the fiscal periods ended March
31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, as indicated in our report dated May 17,
2010.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
onthat information.





We are aware that our report referred to above, which is
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, is incorporated by reference in the following Registration
Statements:





·
            Registration StatementNo. 33-48385 on Form
  S-8;


·
            Registration Statement No. 33-91806 on Form
      S-8;


·
            Registration Statement No. 333-53029 on Form
      S-8;


·
            Registration Statement No. 333-70626 on Form
      S-8;


·
            Registration Statement No. 333-130811 on Form S-8;
      and


·
            Registration Statement No. 333-88192 on Form
  S-3.





We also are aware that the aforementioned report,
pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not
considered a part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





/s/
Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP





Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP


Garden City, New York
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1642

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to

the products of Cambodia, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 1995

Mr. CRANE (for himself and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation

treatment) to the products of Cambodia, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) Cambodia is now under democratic rule

6 after 20 years of undemocratic regimes and civil

7 war, and is striving to rebuild its market economy;

8 (2) extension of unconditional most-favored-na9 tion treatment would assist Cambodia in developing
2

•HR 1642 IH

1 its economy based on free market principles and be2 coming competitive in the global marketplace;

3 (3) establishing normal commercial relations on

4 a reciprocal basis with Cambodia will promote

5 United States exports to the rapidly growing South6 east Asian region and expand opportunities for

7 United States business and investment in the Cam8 bodian economy; and

9 (4) expanding bilateral trade relations that in10 cludes a commercial agreement will promote further

11 progress by Cambodia on human rights and toward

12 adoption of regional and world trading rules and

13 principles.

14 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT

15 TO THE PRODUCTS OF CAMBODIA.

16 (a) HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE AMEND17 MENT.—General note 3(b) of the Harmonized Tariff

18 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

19 ‘‘Kampuchea’’.

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

22 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

23 the effective date of a notice published in the Federal Reg24 ister by the United States Trade Representative that a

25 trade agreement obligating reciprocal most-favored-nation
3

•HR 1642 IH

1 treatment between Cambodia and the United States has

2 entered into force.

3 SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

4 The President shall submit to the Congress, not later

5 than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this

6 Act, a report on the trade relations between the United

7 States and Cambodia pursuant to the trade agreement de8 scribed in section 2(b).

Æ
#### Toledo Bar Association *v.*Lockhart.

[Cite as *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Lockhart*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 7.]

(No. 98-401

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*8
      *Thomas J. Szyperski*and *M. Susan Swanson,*for relator.

*James D. Caruso,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s shoplifting violated DR 1-102(A)(4). *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 396, 700 N.E.2d 323.

*9In view of respondent’s attempts to rehabilitate herself, we adopt the recommendation of the panel. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years, with one year of that suspension stayed. Respondent will be placed on probation, and her reinstatement will be conditioned on her payment of all fines and other costs related to her actions. Upon completion of the suspension, she shall submit to a complete psychiatric examination by a physician of relator’s choice to determine whether she is emotionally fit to resume the practice of law. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Young, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, . JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.

John C. Young, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. In accordance with the recommendation of the board, I would indefinitely suspend the respondent.
§ 221.73 Initial Hearing Officer consideration. ( a ) When a case is received for action, the Hearing Officer shall examine the material submitted. If the Hearing Officer determines that there is insufficient evidence to proceed, or that there is any other reason which would make penalty action inappropriate, the Hearing Officer shall return the case to the Vessel Transfer Officer with a written statement of the reason. The Vessel Transfer Officer may close the case or investigate the matter further. If additional evidence supporting a violation is discovered, the Vessel Transfer Officer may resubmit the matter to the Hearing Officer.
( b ) If the Hearing Officer determines that there is reason to believe that a violation has been committed, the Hearing Officer notifies the Party in writing by registered or certified mail of— ( 1 ) The alleged violation and the applicable statute and regulations;
( 2 ) The maximum penalty that may be assessed for each violation;
( 3 ) The general nature of the procedure for assessing and collecting the penalty;
( 4 ) The amount of the penalty that appears to be appropriate, based on the material then available to the Hearing Officer;
( 5 ) The right to examine all the material in the case file and have a copy of all written documents provided upon requests; and
( 6 ) The right to request a hearing.
( c ) If at any time it appears that the addition of another Party to the proceedings is necessary or desirable, the Hearing Officer will provide the additional Party and the Party alleged to be in violation with notice as described above.
( d ) At any time during a proceeding, before the Hearing Officer issues a decision under § 221.89, the Hearing Officer and the Party may agree to a Settlement of the case.