alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DECISIONONE HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE YEAR THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000000000
<NAME> 0
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,877
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,869
<INVENTORY>                                     34,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,635
<PP&E>                                          70,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 623,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   623,105
<SALES>                                        785,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               785,950
<CGS>                                          581,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  581,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,849
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



I, Paul D. Meyer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 5, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL D. MEYER                    
|Paul D. Meyer                        
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending April 12, 2008

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|CARPENTER FUND MANAGER GP, LLC | * 3A1          | Carpenter Fund Manager GP, LLC, Carpenter Fund Management, LLC, and Carpenter Community Bancfund-A, L.P., all of Irvine, California, to become bank holding companies by acquiring 24.3 percent of Mission Community Bancorp, and thereby its subsidiary, Mission Community Bank, both of San Luis Obispo, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/02/2008     
|Newspaper:                     | Not available 
|Federal Register:              | 05/02/2008    
|Oak Valley Bancorp             | 3A1            | Oak Valley Bancorp to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Oak Valley Community Bank, both of Oakdale,California.                                                                                                                                                                                 | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Dismissed; Opinion Filed July 31, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00515
- CV BUILD
- INFINITY.COM, LLC D/B/A INFINITY C ONSTRUCTION , Appellant V. SCOTT AND ELIZABETH WOODARD , Appellees On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 05680 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Myers By letter dated June 11, 2 018, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal as the clerk’s record does not reflect a final judgment has been entered. See Lehman v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (subject to few, mostly statutory exceptions, appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals from judgments and orders that dispose of all parties and claims). The record reflects appellees sued appellant for breach of contract, breach of warranty, violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, fraud, conversion, failure to provide certain statutory notices under the property code, and attorney’s fees. The tria l court granted summary judgment on appellees’ claims for breach of contract and attorney’s fees but denied summary judgment on the rest of the claims. Subsequently, appellees filed a notice non

- suiting the remaining claims. The record, however, does not reflect the trial court signed an order dismissing– 2

–

those claims, and without a dismissal order, the case is not final and appealable. See Davidoff v. GX Tech. Corp. , 134 S.W.3d 514, 515 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2004, order) (per curiam) (“Because
the trial court has not signed an order dismissing GX’s non

- suited counterclaims, the record does not contain a final, appealable judgment.”). In our letter questioning our jurisdiction, we directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our concerns no later than June 21, 2018 and to have a supplemental clerk’s record filed if the response was based on documents not contained in the clerk’s record. We also cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. S ee T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a),(c). To date, appellant has not filed the requested letter brief or had a supplemental clerk’s record filed demonstrating our jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.3(a),(c).

18 0515F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BUILD

- INFINITY.COM, LLC D/B/A INFINITY CONSTRUCTION, Appellant No. 05

- 18

- 00515

- CV V. SCOTT AND ELIZABETH WOODARD, Appellees On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 05680. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices Lang and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER appellees Scott and Elizabeth Woodard recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Build

- Infinity.com, LLC d/b/a Infinity Construction.
Judgment entered this 31 st day of July, 2018.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending April 8, 2006

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|MIZRAHI TEFAHOT BANK LTD. | FBSEA          | Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd. (the "Bank"), Ramat-Gan, Israel, is applying to the Board, under Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K, to establish a branch in New York, New York by relocating the Bank's Los Angeles, California FDIC-insured branch.  

In addition, the Bank is applying to the Board, under Section 211.24(a)(1), to establish a representative office in Los Angeles, California, which will serve as a liaison office with the Bank's remaining California-based customers. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 61.40-10 Test procedure details. ( a ) Test procedure documents must be in a step-by-step or checkoff list format. Each test instruction must specify equipment status, apparatus necessary to perform the tests, safety precautions, safety control and alarm setpoints, the procedure to be followed, and the expected test result.
( b ) Test techniques must not simulate monitored system conditions by mis-adjustment, artificial signals, improper wiring, tampering, or revision of the system unless the test would damage equipment or endanger personnel. In the latter case, the use of a synthesized signal or condition applied to the sensor is acceptable if test equipment is maintained in good working order and is periodically calibrated to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Other test techniques must be approved by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center.
[CGD 80-064, 49 FR 32193, Aug. 13, 1984, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50463, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50728, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49229, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59778, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48924, Aug. 18, 2014]
#### § 308.408 Right of Maritime Administrator to change rate of premium.

The Maritime Administrator, acting for the Secretary of Transportation, shall have the right to change the rate of premium at any time, and unless the revised rate of premium is accepted in writing by the Assured within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the Assured of notice of the revised rate, the policy shall become null and void and of no effect as of midnight, Standard Time, at the location of the shipyard on the fifteenth (15th) day after receipt of said notice. Premium at the revised rate shall be payable for the fifteen (15) day period during which the insurance remained in force unless the Assured, within such period, dispatches notice to MARAD by fax, certified mail or courier of his refusal to accept such revised rate of premium, in which event premium at the revised rate shall be payable for that portion of the fifteen (15) day period prior to dispatch of such notice. Upon the dispatch of such notice of non-acceptance the insurance shall terminate.
§ 502.145 Interrogatories to parties. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) *Number.* Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the presiding officer, a party may serve on any other party no more than 50 written interrogatories, including all discrete subparts. Leave to serve additional interrogatories may be granted to the extent consistent with § 502.141(e)(2).
( 2 ) *Scope.* An interrogatory may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under § 502.141(e) and (f). An interrogatory is not objectionable merely because it asks for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the presiding officer may order that the interrogatory need not be answered until designated discovery is complete, or until a prehearing conference or some other time.
( b ) *Answers and objections.* ( 1 ) *Responding party.* The interrogatories must be answered: ( i ) By the party to whom they are directed; or
( ii ) If that party is a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or a governmental agency, by any officer or representative, who must furnish the information available to the party.
( 2 ) *Time to respond.* The responding party must serve its answers and any objections within 30 days after being served with the interrogatories. A shorter or longer time may be stipulated to as provided in § 502.141(l) of this subpart or be ordered by the presiding officer.
( 3 ) *Answering each interrogatory.* Each interrogatory must, to the extent it is not objected to, be answered separately and fully in writing under oath.
( 4 ) *Objections.* The grounds for objecting to an interrogatory must be stated with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the presiding officer, for good cause, excuses the failure.
( 5 ) *Signature.* The person who makes the answers must sign them, and the attorney who objects must sign any objections.
( c ) *Use.* An answer to an interrogatory may be used to the extent allowed by the rules in this part.
( d ) *Option to produce business records.* If the answer to an interrogatory may be determined by examining, auditing, compiling, abstracting, or summarizing a party's business records (including electronically stored information), and if the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer will be substantially the same for either party, the responding party may answer by: ( 1 ) Specifying the records that must be reviewed, in sufficient detail to enable the interrogating party to locate and identify them as readily as the responding party could; and
( 2 ) Giving the interrogating party a reasonable opportunity to examine and audit the records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or summaries. [Rule 205.]
[77 FR 61529, Oct. 10, 2012. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016; 81 FR 93837, Dec. 22, 2016]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, J. Bryan Baker, certify that:  (1)
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of FirstCity Financial Corporation;(2)
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;(3)
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;(4)
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: April 29, 2005
    /s/ J. Bryan BakerChief Financial Officer