alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

# Time and Date:

May 21, 2007, 11 a.m. to 2 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. 

# Place:

This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the toll free number and pass code needed to participate in this meeting by telephone. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565. 

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

William A. Quade, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Enforcement and Program Delivery. 

[FR Doc. 07-2181 Filed 4-30-07; 12:49 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 2

- 00 970

- CR

Style: Hector Leal Rodriguez v. The State of Texas , Appellee

Type of motion s : Motion for rehearing filed August 17, 2015

Part y filing motion s : Appell ant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justice s Keyes

, Bland, and Massengale

.

Date: Octo ber 15 , 201 5
SERVED: APRIL 30, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RUGBY AVIATION 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0642 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014NM010021) has been a~signed 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on ~:_.~,!.t.ached ·serv)e List. --···· 

( ,_ 6-2/G~-- --- ie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Ju e 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation .4-dministration 

800 IndependenceiAvenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC *591 

Attention: He . ing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

. Wi bur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

President : 

Rugby Aviation, ~.L. C., Respondent 

4167 Mitchell Waf 

Bellingham, W A ~8226 

J.C. Becker, Respqndent's Counsel 

PO Box 13253 ! 

Mill Creek, WA 9~082-1253 

TEL: 425-280-20p4 

Email: jcb@lojcbrcom 

Robert Spitzer, Cdl'mplainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation 'i~dministration 

Northwest Mount¥n Region (ANM-7) 

1601 Lind A venu~ Southwest 

Renton, WA 9805!7 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAJ<:425-227-1007 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Riphard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearing~, M-20 

U.S. Department qfTransportation 

1200 New Jersey{\venue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5~21 Staff Assistant 

FAJ<: 202-366-7$36 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0642 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was byiU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adrninistrat,on, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention:! Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

I 

2
#### BENJAMIN BARON, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT.

Submitted May 17, 1929

*Decided*June 21, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

Eor the appellant, *Maurice G. Brigadier.*

For the appellee, *Benjamin Baron, pro se.*

Per Curiam.

The suit arises out of a collision between the defendant’s truck and an automobile belonging to the plaintiff which was *566parked. Of tlie four grounds of appeal the first three relate to the admission of evidence and the fourth is that the court erred in refusing a nonsuit.

No question was raised about the negligence of the driver of the. truck.. The fundamental question in the case was whether the city as a municipal corporation was liable for that negligence; the plaintiff’s claim, that such liability existed, was predicated on the proposition that the truck was a truck of the Bayonne water department, and that as in most other cases the city operated its water plant and sold water to customers at a price intended to cover expenses and perhaps •produce a- profit. It ivas in evidence that the city sold water to outside manufacturing plants in addition to its own citizens, and that would ordinarily be enough to bring it within the principle laid down in such cases as *Olesiewicz*v. *City of Camden,*100 *N. J. L.*336,; and the very recent case of *Harper*v. *East Orange,*6 *N. J. Adv. R.*1539, in which the water department of that city was involved.

The defendant undertook to show that as a matter of fact the city did not make any profit on its sales of water but actually made a loss. These questions were excluded as immaterial and properly so, as that is not the legitimate test of liability.

The "judgment will be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting location and time.

# SUMMARY:

This notice lists the location and time of the first meeting of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jack Wells, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Transportation, 202-366-9224,                         *jack.wells@dot.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    By                     **Federal Register**                     Notice dated March 12, 2007, the U.S. Department of Transportation the “Department”) issued a notice of intent to form the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (the “Financing Commission”), in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”) (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (“SAFETEA-LU”) (Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144). Section 11142(a) of SAFETEA-LU established the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and charged it to analyze future highway and transit needs and the finances of the Highway Trust Fund and to make recommendations regarding alternative approaches to financing transportation infrastructure.                

## Notice of Meeting Location and Time

The Department has set April 25, 2007, as the date for the inaugural Financing Commission meeting. The meeting will take place from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Oklahoma City Memorial Room (Room 2230) in the Department's headquarters building, located at 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.

Issued on April 6, 2007.

Jack Wells,

Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Transportation, Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 07-1808  Filed 4-6-07; 3:01 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



|(a) |  | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of a date within
the 90-day period prior to the filing of this report, an evaluation of the
effectiveness of Cameco Corporations disclosure controls and procedures
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the United
States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) was carried
out by Cameco Corporations Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief
Financial Officer (CFO). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have
concluded that as of such date Cameco Corporations disclosure controls
and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by Cameco Corporation in reports that it files or submits under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in United States Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) |  | Changes in Internal Controls. Subsequent to the completion of their
evaluation, there have been no significant changes in Cameco Corporations
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the
internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 30, 2008

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|RICHWOOD BANKING COMPANY, INC., THE | Premises       | The Richwood Banking Company, Richwood, Ohio, seeks retroactive approval to exceed the limitation on investment in bank premises proscribed by section 24A of the Federal Reserve Act | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Jesse Briggs *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, and two other cases in favor of other plaintiffs against the same defendant.

—Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied in each case, without costs.

Smith, P. J., not sitting.
#### § 50.10-5 Coast Guard District Commander or District Commander.

The term *Coast Guard District Commander* or *District Commander* means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant to command all Coast Guard activities within his district, which include the inspections, enforcement, and administration of Subtitle II, Title 46, U.S. Code, Title 46 and Title 33 U.S. Code, and regulations under these statutes.

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18808, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51200, Sept. 30, 1997]
```

[House Document 107-73]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

107th Congress, 1st Session - - -- - - - - - - - House Document 107-73

 
    U.S. TRADE AND INVESTMENT POLICY TOWARD SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA AND 
       IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   THE 2001 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT ON U.S. TRADE AND 
 INVESTMENT POLICY TOWARD SUB-SAHARAN/AFRICA AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 
                   AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT

    May 22, 2001.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    As required by section 106 of title I of the Trade and 
Development Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-200), I transmit 
herewith the 2001 Comprehensive Report of the President on U.S. 
Trade and Investment Policy toward Sub-Saharan Africa and 
Implementation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, May 18, 2001.
    
    

```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARNELL FIELDS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF DETROIT POLICE OFFICER

JESSICA JOHNS, and CITY OF DETROIT

POLICE OFFICER DARRELL

LIGHTFOOT,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 15-12319

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [34] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [28]

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation. (Dkt. 34.) Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint

based on Plaintiff’s failure to produce Court-ordered discovery. The Magistrate Judge

recommends denying the motion and neither party has filed objections. Being fully advised

in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report

and Recommendation, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court hereby

ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. It is further

ordered that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

S/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: April 14, 2016

2:15-cv-12319-NGE-DRG Doc # 40 Filed 04/14/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 390
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on April 14, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Carol J. Bethel 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-12319-NGE-DRG Doc # 40 Filed 04/14/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 391
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

I, D. Jonathan Merriman, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of MCF Corporation; 

 

2.  Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c)  Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based onour evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

a)  Allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 3, 2008

|Filer                | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|-------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|LANDMARK BANCORP INC | 3A1* 18C       | Landmark Bancorp, Inc., Pittston,PA, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Landmark Community Bank, Pittston, PA. | Newspaper:05/28/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:           | 05/28/2008    
|Federal Register:    | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 99.5
 Contractual Cash Obligations
 Due inLess Than
    
    Due in
    
    Due inAs at December 31, 2009
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    1  3
    
    4  5
    
    Due After(Cdn$ millions)
    
    Total
    
    Year
    
    Years
    
    Years
    
    5 YrsLong-term debt
    
    
    794
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    794BPLP capital lease 1
    
    
    170
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    28
    
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    96Interest on long-term debt
    
    
    358
    
    
    
    42
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    146Interest on BPLP capital lease 1
    
    
    67
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    16Provision for reclamation
    
    
    495
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    449Other liabilities
    
    
    249
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    248Unconditional purchase commitments
1, 2
    
    
    879
    
    
    
    140
    
    
    
    334
    
    
    
    370
    
    
    
    35Total contractual cash obligations
    
    
    3,012
    
    
    
    220
    
    
    
    486
    
    
    
    522
    
    
    
    1,784
 
 1
    
    Denominated in US dollars, converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2009
rate of Cdn$1.0466.2
    
    Virtually all of Cameco Corporations purchase commitments are under
long-term, fixed-price arrangements. Commercial Commitments
 As at December 31, 2009(Cdn$ millions)
    
    Total amounts committedStandby letters of credit 1
    
    
    592BPLP guarantees 2
    
    
    87Total commercial commitments
    
    
    679
 
 1
    
    The standby letters of credit maturing in 2010 were issued with a one-year term
and will be automatically renewed on a year-by-year basis until the underlying obligations are
resolved. These obligations are primarily the decommissioning and reclamation of Cameco
Corporations mining and conversion facilities. As such, the letters of credit are expected
to remain outstanding well into the future.2
    
    At December 31, 2009, Cameco Corporations total commitment for financial
assurances given on behalf of BPLP was estimated to be Cdn$87 million. Refer to note 26 in
the 2009 consolidated audited financial statements.