alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.09-35 Preferment of charges. ( a ) If in the course of an investigation by a Marine Board there appears probable cause for the preferment of charges against any licensed or certificated personnel, the Marine Board shall, either during or immediately following the investigation and before the witnesses have dispersed, apprise the District Commander of such evidence for possible action in accordance with part 5 of this subchapter, without waiting for the approval of the report by the Commandant. Such action or proceedings shall be independent and apart from any other action which may be later ordered by the Commandant or taken by other authorities.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

KAY PREE, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10999 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND 

TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT ISSUE OF WHETHER TO IMPOSE 

SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL 

On December 16, 2015, this Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to 

provide certain discovery responses within fourteen days. Plaintiff failed to 

comply with the order, and Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to make 

discovery. The Court held a telephonic hearing on the motion on February 3, 

2015. During the hearing, counsel for Plaintiff assured the Court that Plaintiff has 

now provided full responses as ordered by the Court. Despite the Court's serious 

concerns about the repeated failure of Plaintiff's counsel to comply with orders of 

this Court and with the rules governing practice in this Court, the Court DENIES 

the motion to dismiss. Under these circumstances, the remedy of dismissal would 

be too harsh to Plaintiff herself. However, the Court will reconsider whether to 

2:15-cv-10999-MFL-RSW Doc # 29 Filed 02/03/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 583
dismiss the action if, through later discovery, it is revealed that, contrary to the 

assurances of Plaintiff's counsel during the telephonic hearing, Plaintiff has not, as 

of this date, provided the full discovery responses ordered by the Court. Finally, 

the Court is taking under advisement and is continuing to consider whether to 

impose a monetary sanction against Plaintiff's counsel for failing to provide 

discovery and failing to comply with the Court's discovery orders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 3, 2016 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on February 3, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-10999-MFL-RSW Doc # 29 Filed 02/03/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 584
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel, Comparative Medicine SEP.                    

*Date:*                         June 12, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mohan Viswanathan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Center for Research Resources, or National Institutes of Health, 6705 Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy Plaza, Rom 1084, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0829,                         *viswanathanm@ncrr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 30, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2794 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:** Recent trends in U.S. services trade
1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016

 
SuDoc:ITC 1.15/3:
Item Number:0908-E-12(online)
CGP system Number:000535138
#### Kennett *v.*Durgin.

The owner or occupant of land, having the custody and control of another’s cattle kept by him, is liable for their trespasses upon land of an adjoining owner.

Trespass, *quare clausum.*The referee found that cattle whose owner lived in New York, and which were kept on the farm of the defendant, and under his care and management, broke into the plaintiff’s adjoining close, and there did damage amounting to *$12.*In the action of which this is a review, the plaintiff recovered judgment for $30, which was satisfied. The court ordered judgment on the report for the defendant for $18 damages and $18 costs. The defendant claimed that on these facts the action could not be maintained against him, and excepted.

*J. H.*Hobbs, for the plaintiff.

*Copeland*Edgerly, for the defendant.

Allen, J.

The owner of cattle kept on land of another, but remaining in his own care and control, is liable for their trespasses on land of a third person; but if the owner or occupant of the land has the custody, he and not the owner of the cattle is liable. *Tewksbury*v. Bucklin, 7 N. H. 518, 521; *Noyes*v. Colby, 30 N. H. 143, 153. The defendant owned and occupied the land where the cattle were kept, and had the care and control of them. He was not a mere servant of the owner, acting under his directions, but, as general agent, had charge of the cattle kept there, and was liable for their trespasses.

*561The judgment in the action before review having been satisfied by the statutes in force when the review was undertaken, the defendant was entitled to recover the amount of reduction of the former’s judgment and costs not exceeding the reduction.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Smith J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 42.05-47 Marine inspector or inspector.

These terms mean any person from the civilian or military branch of the Coast Guard assigned under the superintendence and direction of an Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, or any other person as may be designated for the performance of duties with respect to the inspection, enforcement, and administration of title 52, Revised Statutes, and acts amendatory thereof or supplemental thereto, and rules and regulations thereunder.

[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10051, July 12, 1968]
#### § 54.03-1 Scope.

The pressure vessels for low temperature operation must be as required by Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) as modified by this subpart.

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65167, Oct. 31, 2008]
Description of Goldstein Reimbursement Arrangement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Description of Goldstein Reimbursement Arrangement 
  
 On February 7, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Maxygen, Inc. approved a change in the compensation
arrangements of Elliot Goldstein, the Company’s Senior Vice President – Clinical Development and Danish Operations. The change in the arrangement has not been reduced to a formal document. The approval provides that Dr. Goldstein shall be
entitled to receive reimbursement of relocation expenses actually incurred by him in connection with his relocation from the United Kingdom to Denmark in 2003. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement is not to exceed 517,200 DKK (approximately
US$90,000) and is contingent upon Dr. Goldstein providing adequate evidence supporting such expenses and their connection with his relocation. The approval also provides, in addition to the reimbursement, gross up payments in an amount sufficient to
pay Dr. Goldstein’s taxes, actually incurred, in connection with the reimbursement payment and the gross up payment.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending September 13, 2008

----

EnforcementABN AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands  -- cease and desist order dated December 19, 2005, terminated September 10, 2008.					-Announced, September 12, 2008 					Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc., Newnan, Georgia, and Neighborhood Community Bank  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Banking Commissioner of the State of Georgia.					-Announced, September 10, 2008 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend with revision the Domestic Finance Company Report of Consolidated Assets and Liabilities (FR 2248), International Applications and Prior Notifications Under Subpart B of Regulation K (FR K-2), and Application for a Foreign Organization to Become a Bank Holding Company (FR Y-3F).					-Approved, September 10, 2008 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $25 billion in 84-day credit on September 8, 2008. 					-Announced, September 8, 2008 					Term Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $25 billion in 28-day credit on September 9, 2008.					-Announced, September 9, 2008 					

Regulations And PoliciesCapital Adequacy Guidelines  -- publication for comment of interagency amendments that would permit a banking organization to reduce the amount of its goodwill deduction from tier 1 capital by any associated deferred tax liability.					-Approved, September 12, 2008 					Privacy Act Records  -- publication for comment of notice of a new system of records in connection with implementation of the Board's Electronic Applications system (E-Apps) that allows banking institutions to submit regulatory applications, notices, and related materials electronically.					-Approved, September 11, 2008 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: September 19, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 154 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 154

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide the penalty of death 
    for certain murders of State and local correctional officers by 
             incarcerated persons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide the penalty of death 
    for certain murders of State and local correctional officers by 
             incarcerated persons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Correction Officer Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 51 (relating to homicide) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1122. Murder of State and local correctional officers by 
              prisoners
    ``(a) Whoever, being incarcerated pursuant to a conviction for 
crime, kills an individual who is a State or local correctional 
officer--
            ``(1) while such individual is engaged in carrying out 
        official duties as such officer;
            ``(2) because of the nature of the official duties of such 
        officer; or
            ``(3) because of such individual's being such an officer;
shall be subject to the penalty of death, if the killing is a first 
degree murder, and subject to the penalties provided in sections 1111 
and 1112 of this title in any other case.
    ``(b) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `State or local correctional officer' means 
        any person who is a State or local officer or employee, as such 
        term is defined in section 1501 of title 5, and who in the 
        course of official duty performs corrections-related or law 
        enforcement functions; and
            ``(2) the term `State or local government' includes the 
        District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory and 
        possession of the United States.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 51 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1122. Murder of State and local correctional officers by 
                            prisoners.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MARY ANN MCBRIDE; BRIAN 

STANLEY WITTMAN; and 

RALPH WILLIAMS,

Plaintiffs, 

v

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS; DANIEL H. 

HEYNS; THOMAS FINCO; 

RANDALL TREACHER; 

ANTHONY STEWART; JEFFREY 

WOODS; and CATHLEEN 

STODDARD,

Defendants.

NO. 2:15-cv-11222

HON. SEAN F. COX 

MAG. DAVID R. GRAND

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

A. Reed-Bey v. Pramstaller, 603 F.3d 322 (6th Cir. 2010)

B. Ellis v. Vadlamudi, 568 F. Supp. 2d 778 (E.D. Mich. 2008)

C. Mingus v. Butler, 591 F.3d 474 (6th Cir. 2010)

D. Paolone v. Altiere, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160415 (N.D. 

Ohio Nov. 8, 2012)

E. Lee v. Eller, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17920 (S.D. Ohio Feb.

12, 2014)

F. Zemedagegehu v. Arthur, 2015 WL 1930539 (E.D. Va. Apr.

28, 2015)

Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 23-1, PageID.287 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 21, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL
REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          3,701
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,448
<INVENTORY>                                    53,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              115,365
<PP&E>                                        213,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                106,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                357,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          46,797
<BONDS>                                        36,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        9,015
<OTHER-SE>                                    115,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  357,714
<SALES>                                       277,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              277,907
<CGS>                                         227,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 227,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,136
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             8,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    8,068
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .98
        



</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending February 14, 2009

----

EnforcementExchange Bank of Missouri, Fayette, Missouri  -- written agreement dated August 14, 2006, terminated January 30, 2009.					-Announced, February 9, 2009 					FirstCity Bancorp, Inc., Stockbridge, Georgia  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the Banking Commissioner of the State of Georgia.					-Announced, February 9, 2009 					Genoa Banking Company, Genoa, Ohio  -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, February 9, 2009 					

Monetary and Financial PolicyTerm Auction Facility  -- TAF auction in the amount of $150 billion in 28-day credit on February 9, 2009.					-Announced, February 9, 2009 					

PersonnelDivision of Information Technology  -- appointment of Wayne A. Edmondson as deputy director and Rajasekhar R. Yelisetty as assistant director.					-Approved, February 12, 2009 					

Testimony And StatementsFederal Reserve Credit Programs  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on Financial Services on Federal Reserve programs to strengthen credit markets and the economy.					-Published, February 10, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: February 19, 2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending May 10, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us