alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George II. Blackburn *v.*The State of Ohio.

Motion for the allowance of a writ of error.

It appears from the record in this case that, after the verdict of guilty was returned, the defendant filed his motion in writing for a new trial; but it docs not appear what disposition, if any, was made of the motion. Afterward, upon inquiry, the defendant stated to the court that he had nothing further to say why sentence should not be *555pronounced; and thereupon the court, without objection from tho defendant, proceeded to judgment and sentenced the defendant to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of years.

*Blackburn § Shay,*for the motion.

By the Court.

Tho judgment can not be reversed on the ground that the sentence was passed pending the motion for a new trial. Upon such a record it must be presumed that the motion for a new trial was abandoned before judgment. *Young*v. *The State,*6 Ohio, 435-437.

*Motion overruled.*
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of ourreport dated January 26, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of MicroFinancialIncorporated as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and2006 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements onForm S-8 (File Nos. 333-75801, 333-77211 and 333-85324) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-122020).   /s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd. Boston, Massachusetts
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24A
 
                           SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints CLARENCE J. BAUDHUIN, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1997, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by Zila, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and
all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits
thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to such attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes
as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that such
attorney-in-fact and agent, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
 
DATED: October 7, 1997
 
                                                  /s/  JOSEPH HINES
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                       JOSEPH HINES
STATE OF ARIZONA
                               ss.
County of Maricopa
 
     On this 7th day of October, 1997, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally appeared JOSEPH HINES, known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same
for the purposes therein contained.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
 
                                                 /s/  JANICE BACKUS
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Notary Public
 
My commission expires:
 
October 23, 1997
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending April 29, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### In re Disqualification of Martin. The State of Ohio *v.*Keenan.

[Cite as *In re Disqualification of Martin*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1228.]

(No. 98-AP-050

Decided April 30, 1998.)

Moyer, CJ.

This affidavit of disqualification was filed by Nancy J. Dameron, counsel for defendant Thomas Keenan, seeking the disqualification of Judge Steven E. Martin from further proceedings regarding the above-captioned case.

Affiant asserts that Judge Martin has ruled against the defense on every . motion filed in the underlying case, including several motions that were heard on April 23, 1998. Judge Martin disputes this assertion and states that he has ruled in favor of the defense on a number of evidentiary matters and matters related to the defendant’s bond. Regardless, disagreement or dissatisfaction with a judge’s rulings of law are not, without more, grounds for disqualification, see *In re Disqualification of Murphy*(1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 605, 522 N.E.2d 459, and there is no indication that Judge Martin’s rulings in the underlying case are the product of bias or prejudice against affiant or her client.

Affiant also alleges that Judge Martin personally dislikes her, but she fails to include any facts to substantiate this claim. R.C. 2701.03(B)(1) requires that an affiant include specific allegations on which a claim of disqualification is based and facts to support those allegations. Vague and unsubstantiated allegations, such *1229as those made by affiant, are insufficient to support a finding of bias or prejudice. See *In re Disqualification of Walker*(1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 606, 522 N.E.2d 460.

For these reasons, the affidavit of disqualification is found not well taken and is denied. The case shall proceed before Judge Martin.
§ 39.6005 Inspection prior to conducting gas-freeing operations—B/ALL. ( a ) The following inspections must be conducted by the barge person in charge prior to commencing gas-freeing operations, and show that— ( 1 ) Each part of the barge's vapor collection system is aligned to allow vapor to flow to a cleaning facility's vapor control system (VCS);
( 2 ) If a fluid displacement system is used to conduct gas-freeing operations— ( i ) The fluid supply line is connected to the fluid injection connection; and
( ii ) The maximum fluid injection rate is determined in accordance with 46 CFR 39.6007(c)(2);
( 3 ) The maximum stripping or gas-freeing rate is determined in accordance with 46 CFR 39.6003(c) or 39.6007(c), respectively, and adequate openings required by 46 CFR 39.6007(c)(1) are available and identified;
( 4 ) The pressure-sensing and pressure-indicating devices required by 33 CFR 154.2203 are connected as required by 46 CFR 39.6003(b);
( 5 ) The maximum and minimum operating pressures of the barge being cleaned are determined;
( 6 ) Unrepaired loose covers, kinks, bulges, gouges, cuts, slashes, soft spots, or any other defects which would permit the discharge of vapors through the vapor recovery hose material must be detected during inspection and repaired prior to operation;
( 7 ) The facility vapor connection is electrically insulated from the barge vapor connection and the fluid injection connection is electrically insulated from the fluid injection source, if fitted, in accordance with OCIMF ISGOTT section 17.5 (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 39.1005); and
( 8 ) All equipment is bonded in accordance with 46 CFR 39.6001(h).
#### Columbus Bar Association *v.*Emerson.

[Cite as *Columbus Bar Assn. v. Emerson*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 375.]

*376(No. 98-1744

Submitted September 29, 1998

Decided January 13, 1999.)

*378*Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease*and *Julie A. Davis; Schottensfein, Zox & Dunn*and *James E. Davidson;*and *Bruce A. Campbell,*for relator.

*Wesley C. Emerson, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s pattern of neglect and misrepresentation coupled with his cavalier attitude towards the disciplinary proceedings establishes his present unfitness to practice law in Ohio. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent from the majority’s decision to indefinitely suspend the respondent and would disbar the respondent. His problem, time after time, of obtaining retainers and utterly failing to do anything about the matter, or to return files and retainer upon discharge, is akin to theft. Respondent’s failure to cooperate in the disciplinary process or to present any mitigation evidence to explain his abusive course of conduct further supports that he is totally unfit to continue the practice of law in this state. Therefore, I would disbar the respondent.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 860
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 2 of 16 Pg ID 861
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 3 of 16 Pg ID 862
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 4 of 16 Pg ID 863
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 5 of 16 Pg ID 864
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 6 of 16 Pg ID 865
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 7 of 16 Pg ID 866
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 8 of 16 Pg ID 867
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 9 of 16 Pg ID 868
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 10 of 16 Pg ID 869
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 11 of 16 Pg ID 870
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 12 of 16 Pg ID 871
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 13 of 16 Pg ID 872
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 14 of 16 Pg ID 873
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 15 of 16 Pg ID 874
4:15-cv-12592-LVP-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 03/08/16 Pg 16 of 16 Pg ID 875
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00190

- CV

Chaliese Rippey and all other occupants

v.

Chase Home Finance, LLC §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 1 o f

Tarrant County (2010

- 087757

- 1 )

March 13, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment o f

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Chaliese Rippey pay all costs of this appeal, and

these cost s be paid from the cash deposit in lieu of bond made with the clerk of

the trial co urt for which let execution issue

. The clerk of the trial court shall

refund the remainder of this cash deposit in li eu of bond to Chaliese Rippey.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bob McCoy

___________________ Justice Bob McCoy
#### David B. Amos, *Respondent, v.*Stephen R. Bradley, *Appellan*t.

Order denying resettlement of order, and denying reargument affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
§ 57.06-1 Production test plate requirements. ( a ) Production test plates must be provided for Class I, Class I-L, Class II, and Class II-L pressure vessels are specified in this section.
( b ) Main power boilers must meet the test plate requirements for Class I pressure vessels.
( c ) Test plates are not required for heating boilers or Class III pressure vessels. Test plates are not required for main power boilers or pressure vessels constructed of P1 material as listed in QW/QB 422 of Section IX of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 57.02-1) whose welded joints are fully radiographed as required by part 52 or 54 of this subchapter as applicable except when toughness tests are required in accordance with § 57.06-5. When toughness tests are required, all prescribed production tests must be performed.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18872, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9980, June 17, 1970; CGD 72-206R, 38 FR 17229, June 29, 1973; CGD 74-102, 40 FR 27461, June 30, 1975; CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48050, Sept. 18, 1995]
#### § 327.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes rules and regulations pertaining to the filing of claims designated in § 327.3 and the administrative allowance, or disallowance (actual and presumed), of such claims, in whole or in part, filed by officers and members of crews (hereafter referred to as “seamen”) employed on vessels as employees of the United States through the National Shipping Authority (NSA), Maritime Administration (MarAd), or successor.
§ 565.10 Suspension procedures, period of suspension, and replacement rates. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Suspension prior to effective date.* Pending a determination as to their lawfulness in a prohibition proceeding as described in § 565.9, the Commission may suspend the rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations at any time before their effective date.
( 2 ) *Suspension after effective date.* In the case of rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations that have already become effective, the Commission may, upon the issuance of an order to show cause, suspend those rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations on not less than 30 days' notice to the controlled carrier.
( b ) *Period of suspension.* In any case, no period of suspension may be greater than 180 days.
( c ) *Implementation.* ( 1 ) Upon issuance of an order suspending a rate, charge, classification, rule or regulation in whole or in part, the Commission shall direct the controlled carrier to remove the suspended material from its tariff publication; or
( 2 ) if the matter subject to the suspension order is not covered by paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Commission shall set forth procedures in the order for implementing the suspension.
( 3 ) *Publication.* All orders of suspension shall be published in the Federal Register.
( d ) *Replacement rates.* Controlled carriers may publish in tariffs or file in service contracts rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations in lieu of the suspended matter (“replacement rates”). ( 1 ) *Effective date.* In the case of replacement rates which are published in tariffs and which are scheduled to become effective during a suspension period, may become effective immediately upon either their publication in tariffs or upon the effective date of the suspension, whichever is later.
( 2 ) *Rejection of replacement rates.* The Commission may reject the replacement rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations published in tariffs or filed in service contracts to take effect during the suspension period if they are unjust and unreasonable. In determining whether to reject replacement rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations, the Commission will consider whether they would result in total charges (i.e, rate plus applicable surcharges) that are lower than the lowest comparable charges effective for a common carrier, other than a controlled carrier, serving the same trade.
( 3 ) At the same time it announces replacement rates, the controlled carrier shall submit to the Secretary of the Commission, a letter identifying the specific competing common carrier's rates, charges, classification or rules resulting in total charges which are equal to or lower than its own.
§ 58.30-20 Fluid power hose and fittings. ( a ) The requirements of this section are applicable to those hydraulic and pneumatic systems listed in § 58.30-1.
( b ) Hose and fittings must meet the requirements of subpart 56.60 of this subchapter.
( c ) Hose assemblies may be installed between two points of relative motion but must not be subjected to torsional deflection (twisting) under any conditions of operation and must be limited, in general, to reasonable lengths required for flexibility. Special consideration may be given to the use of longer lengths of flexible hose where required for proper operation of machinery and components in the hydraulic system.
( d ) Sharp bends in hoses must be avoided.
§ 535.406 Modification of agreements. The requirements of this section apply to all agreements except marine terminal agreements and assessment agreements. ( a ) Agreement modifications shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of §§ 535.401, 535.402, and 535.403.
( b ) Agreement modifications shall be made by reprinting the entire page on which the matter being changed is published (“revised page”). The revised page shall indicate the consecutive denomination of the revision (*e.g.*, “1st Revised Page 7”). Additional material may be published on a new original page. New original pages inserted between existing effective pages shall be numbered with an alpha suffix (*e.g.*, a page inserted between page 7 and page 8 shall be numbered 7a).
( c ) Each revised page shall be accompanied by a duplicate page, submitted for illustrative purposes only, indicating the language being modified in the following manner: ( 1 ) Language being deleted or superseded shall be struck through; and,
( 2 ) New and initial or replacement language shall immediately follow the language being superseded and be underlined.
( d ) If a modification requires the relocation of the provisions of the agreement, such modification shall be accompanied by a revised Table of Contents page that shall indicate the new location of the provisions.
§ 35.07-5 Logbooks and records—TB/ALL. ( a ) The master or person in charge of a vessel that is required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook shall maintain the logbook on form CG-706. The official logbook is available free to masters of U.S.-flag vessels from the officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, as form CG-706B or CG-706C, depending on the number of persons employed in the crew. When the voyage is completed, the master or person in charge shall file the logbook with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) The master or person in charge of a vessel that is not required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook, shall maintain, on board, an unofficial logbook or record in any form desired for the purposes of making entries therein as required by law or regulations in this subchapter. Such logs or records are not filed with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, but must be kept available for review by a marine inspector for a period of 1 year after the date to which the records refer. Separate records of tests and inspections of fire fighting equipment must be maintained with the vessel's logs for the period of validity of the vessel's certificate of inspection.
[CGD 95-027, 61 FR 25999, May 23, 1996]
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form S-3 and  related  Prospectuses  (Registration  Nos.  333-67516,  333-40812,
333-34942, 333-69047, 333-43795 and 333-67625) of V-ONE Corporation, and on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-61330, 333-38918, 333-61909, 333-52909 and 333-17749)
of our report dated November 19, 2003, with respect to the financial  statements
and schedule of V-ONE  Corporation  included in this amended Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                    /s/ Aronson & Company


Rockville, Maryland

January 13, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles N.
Blitzer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                       /s/ Charles N. Blitzer
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Charles N. Blitzer
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       November 4, 2002
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 15, 1995 (45), Para 45.33 Senate Enrolled Bill Signed]
[Page 392]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.45.33  senate enrolled bill signed

  The SPEAKER announced his signature to an enrolled bill of the Senate 
of the following title:

       S. 377. An Act to amend a provision of part A of title IX 
     of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 
     relating to Indian education, to provide a technical 
     amendment, and for other purposes
```
Internal IUR Database

Data either directly from plants or pulled from enterprise system and summarized in excel

Import data from enterprise system (as products)

Manual conversion products to chemicals

Plant Data Inputs (Part II)

Processing and Use Inputs

Corporate Level (Part III)

Sum

Business EH&S representative coordinates obtaining information from business (marketing, sales, supply chain)

TSCA expertise totals all chemical imports

TSCA expertise puts data into codes needed for IUR Report

Notes: - Data must be validated by plant and business review - Development of software for internal collection of data and translating into form for submission significant IT project

IUR Data Collection Process

Changes needed for 2011 - ID substances subject to test rule; neevolume below 25,000 lbs. - Annual manufacture/import volumes 2 - Export volumes for chemicals;  - Volume used on site; - Note if substance is by-product used fo

Access other systems for imports not in enterprise systems 

D

a

t

a

V

a

li

da

t

i

on

Programm

electro

submiss

EPA 

- M
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Annual Report of CERBCO,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form  10-KSB/A  for the fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George
Wm. Erikson, the Chairman of the Company,  certify, pursuant to and for purposes
of  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/George Wm. Erikson
George Wm. Erikson
Chairman
October 11, 2002