alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 565.8 Special permission.

Section 8(d) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40501(e)) authorizes the Commission, in its discretion and for good cause shown, to permit increases or decreases in rates, or the issuance of new or initial rates, on less than statutory notice under § 565.7. Section 9(c) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40703, 40704(a)) authorizes the Commission to permit a controlled carrier's rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations to become effective on less than 30 days' notice. The Commission may also in its discretion and for good cause shown, permit departures from the requirements of this part. The Commission will consider such requests for special permission by controlled carriers pursuant to its procedures set forth at 46 CFR part 520.

[64 FR 8010, Feb. 18, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 50735, Oct. 1, 2009]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

 ROBERT GUENTHER,     Petitioner     v.   ZAUCHA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERS,     Respondent     v.   XTREME SNOW REMOVAL AND ICE CONTROL,     Respondent 

No. 159 WAL 2015   Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
#### § 58.01-20 Machinery guards.

Gears, couplings, flywheels, and all rotating machinery capable of injuring personnel must be provided with adequate covers or guards.

[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50172, June 12, 2024]
§ 550.505 Failure to supply information. For failure to supply information ordered to be produced or compelled by subpoena in proceedings under this part, the Commission may— ( a ) After notice and an opportunity for hearing, suspend tariffs of a common carrier or that common carrier's right to use the tariffs of conferences of which it is a member; or
( b ) Assess a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each day that the information is not provided.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form S-3 (Registration Nos.  333-40812,  333-34942,  333-69047 and 333-43795) of
V-ONE Corporation and in the related  Prospectuses and on Form S-8 (Registration
Nos. 333-38918, 333-61909, 333-52909 and 333-17749) of our report dated February
9,  2001,  with  respect  to the  financial  statements  and  schedule  of V-ONE
Corporation  included  in this  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K) for the year  ended
December 31, 2000.

                                        /s/   Ernst & Young LLP



McLean, VA
March 30, 2001
Summary of Bonus Plan for Executives



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 SYMMETRICOM, INC. 
  
 SUMMARY OF CASH BONUS PLAN FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES 
  
 On December 23, 2004, the board of directors of Symmetricom, Inc. approved a cash bonus plan for senior executives for fiscal year 2005 (the
“Plan”). The Plan is not set forth in any formal document. Set forth below is a written description of the Plan: 
  
 Bonuses under the Plan may be from 0% to 150% of an employee’s base salary, and will be based upon a comparison of the company’s year over year
revenue growth and net income margins, each weighted equally, relative to a peer group of companies. Payments under the Plan will be made on a quarterly basis at the rate of 17.5% of the pro rated annual bonus amount for that period, and an
additional annual amount at the rate of 30% of the annual bonus amount. Payments under the Plan will be made within sixty days of the end of each fiscal quarter. An employee must be on the payroll for the last work day of the quarter to be eligible
to participate in the Plan for that quarter. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/ WILLIAM SLATER


	 	 	 William Slater
 Chief Financial Officer
#### § 4.03-30 Investigating officer.

An investigating officer is an officer or employee of the Coast Guard designated by the Commandant, District Commander or the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, for the purpose of making investigations of marine casualties and accidents or other matters pertaining to the conduct of seamen. An Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, is an investigating officer without further designation.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-206]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 23, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Part 703 of NCUAs Rules and Regulations, Pilot Program Request. 
Closed pursuant to Exemption (4).

For Further Information Contact: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-206 Filed 1-16-07; 1:44 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
§ 169.681 Disconnect switches and devices. ( a ) Externally operable switches or circuit breakers must be provided for motor and controller circuits and must open all ungrounded conductors of the circuit.
( b ) If the disconnect means is not within sight of the equipment that the circuit supplies, means must be provided for locking the disconnect device in the “open” position.
( c ) For circuits protected by fuses, the disconnect switch required for fuses in § 169.683(b) of this chapter is adequate for disconnecting the circuit from the supply.
( d ) The disconnect means may be in the same enclosure with motor controllers.
( e ) Disconnect means must be provided to open all conductors of generator and shore power cables.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986; 51 FR 10632, Mar. 28, 1986]
# C_2014159EN.01000501.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-428/12) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 34 TFEU and 36 TFEU - Measures of equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports - Complementary private goods transport - The first vehicle of the fleet of a company - Rules for obtaining the road transport authorisation - Road safety and environmental protection))

2014/C 159/06

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Marin and G. Wilms, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego and Centeno Huerta, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 34 TFEU and 36 TFEU — Granting of authorisations for motor vehicles — National legislation requiring, in order to obtain an ‘authorisation for private, own-account transport’, no more than five months to have elapsed since the first registration of the first heavy goods vehicle of an undertaking’s fleet

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | declares that by requiring, in Article 31 of Ministerial Decree FOM/734/2007 of 20 March 2007 implementing the Law on the Regulation of Inland Transport in respect of authorisations for the transport of goods by road for vehicles with a maximum authorised mass exceeding 3,5 tons, that, in order to obtain an authorisation for the private, own-account transport of goods, no more than five months must have elapsed since the first registration of the first vehicle of an undertaking’s fleet, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 34 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1)

declares that by requiring, in Article 31 of Ministerial Decree FOM/734/2007 of 20 March 2007 implementing the Law on the Regulation of Inland Transport in respect of authorisations for the transport of goods by road for vehicles with a maximum authorised mass exceeding 3,5 tons, that, in order to obtain an authorisation for the private, own-account transport of goods, no more than five months must have elapsed since the first registration of the first vehicle of an undertaking’s fleet, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 34 TFEU;

| 2) | orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 08.12.2012.

1

---
§ 56.50-40 Blowoff piping (replaces 122.1.4). ( a ) ( 1 ) The owner or operator of a vessel must follow the requirements for blowoff piping in this section instead of the requirements in 122.1.4 of ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2).
( 2 ) Where blowoff valves are connected to a common discharge from two or more boilers, a nonreturn valve must be provided in the line from each boiler to prevent accidental blowback in the event the boiler blowoff valve is left open.
( b ) Blowoff must be designed for not less than 125 percent of the maximum allowable working pressure of the boiler, or the maximum allowable working pressure of the boiler plus 225 psig, whichever is less. The value of allowable stress for design purposes must be selected as described in § 56.07-10(e) at a temperature not below that of saturated steam at the maximum allowable working pressure of the boiler.
( c ) Boiler blowoff piping which discharges above the lightest loadline of a vessel must be arranged so that the discharge is deflected downward.
( d ) Globe valves must not be used for blowoff service.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9978, June 17, 1970; CGD 73-254, 40 FR 40165, Sept. 2, 1975; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65178, Oct. 31, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Independence Holding Company Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       241,436,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  24,297,000
<MORTGAGE>                                      26,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             347,272,000
<CASH>                                       5,378,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         132,031,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      17,137,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             532,763,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            235,242,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         17,674,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                             111,648,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,720,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,146,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  98,713,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               532,763,000
<PREMIUMS>                                  61,372,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         19,757,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              95,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                               6,406,000
<BENEFITS>                                  47,648,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  4,380,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,660,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,985,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,675,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,675,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cameco Corporation (the Company)
on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Petroff,
Senior Vice-President, Finance & Administration & Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |     |  |                                                
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
| | By: |  | /s/ David M. Petroff                           
| |     |  |                                                
| |     |  | David M. Petroff                               
| |     |  | Senior Vice-President, Finance & Administration
| |     |  | & Chief Financial Officer                      

April 16, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending March 7, 2009

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANKERS BANK, THE   | * Branch       | The Bankers Bank, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to establish a branch at 1700 Redbud Boulevard, Suite 130, McKinney, Texas.                                                    | Newspaper:02/15/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 02/15/2009    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable
|CB BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A1          | CB Bancshares, Inc., Topeka, Kansas, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Citizens Bank of Weir, Weir, Kansas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/03/2009 
|Newspaper:          | Not available 
|Federal Register:   | 04/03/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 42.20-12 Conditions of equilibrium. The following conditions of equilibrium are regarded as satisfactory: ( a ) *Downflooding.* The final waterline after flooding, taking into account sinkage, heel, and trim, is below the lower edge of any opening through which progressive flooding can take place. Such openings include air pipes, ventilators, and openings which are closed by means of weathertight doors (even if they comply with § 42.15-10) or covers (even if they comply with § 42.15-30 or § 42.15-45(d)) but may exclude those openings closed by means of: ( 1 ) Manhole covers and flush scuttles which comply with § 42.15-40;
( 2 ) Cargo hatch covers which comply with § 42.09-5(b);
( 3 ) Hinged watertight doors in an approved position which are secured closed while at sea and so logged; and
( 4 ) Remotely operated sliding watertight doors, and side scuttles of the non-opening type which comply with § 42.15-65.
( b ) *Progressive flooding.* If pipes, ducts, or tunnels are situated within the assumed extent of damage penetration as defined in § 42.20-11 (a) and (b), progressive flooding cannot extend to compartments other than those assumed to be floodable in the calculation for each case of damage.
( c ) *Final angle of heel.* The angle of heel due to unsymmetrical flooding does not exceed 15 degrees. If no part of the deck is immersed, an angle of heel of up to 17 degrees may be accepted.
( d ) *Metacentric height.* The metacentric height of the damaged vessel, in the upright condition, is positive.
( e ) *Residual stability.* Through an angle of 20 degrees beyond its position of equilibrium, the vessel must meet the following conditions: ( 1 ) The righting arm must be positive.
( 2 ) The maximum righting arm must be at least 0.1 meter (4 inches).
( 3 ) The area under the righting arm curve within the 20 degree range must not be less than 0.0175 meter-radians (0.689 inch-radians).
( 4 ) Each submerged opening must be weathertight (e.g. a vent fitted with a ball check valve).
( f ) *Intermediate stages of flooding.* The Commandant is satisfied that the stability is sufficient during intermediate stages of flooding.
[CGD 79-153, 48 FR 38649, Aug. 25, 1983]
Filed 11/18/15 P. v. Navacarmona CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b) . This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

OSCAR NA VACARMONA
,
Defendant and Appellant. B2 6 2 356
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA099670 )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jesse I. Rodriguez , Judge. Affirmed.
Mark S. Givens , under appointment b y the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Respondent.

__________________________________On July 12, 2014, appellant was involved in a hit

- and

- run incident. He had

rear

- ended another vehicle, and then attempted to drive away. The other driver pursued him, and appellant drove into a cul

- de

- sac. He escaped the cul

- de

- sac by running into the other vehicle. Appellant was charged with one count of hit

- and

- run driving (Veh. Code, § 20002, subd. (a)), three counts of assaul t with a deadly weapon, a vehicle (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)), one count of misdemeanor drug possession, and one count of felony vandalism. As part of a plea bargain, o n December 16 , 2014, appellant pled no contest to the drug possession and felony v andalism charges. The remaining charges were dismissed. The trial court sentenced appellant to three

years in county jail for the felony vandalism , and imposed var ious fines and fees. Appellant also was ordered to pay $12,009.64 in victim restitution. Appellant filed

a t imely notice of appeal.
After examining the record, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief raising no issues, but asking this court to independently review the record on appeal pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441

- 4 42. (See Smith v.
Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 264.) On July 31, 2015 , we advised appellant he had 30 days within which to submit by brief or letter any contentions or argument
he wished this court to consider. No response was received.
This court has examined the entire record in accordance with People v.
Wende
, supra , 25 Cal.3d at pages 441

- 442 , and is satisfied appellant’ s attorney has fully complied with the responsibilities of counse l, and no arguable issues exist

. Accordingly, we affirm the ju dgment of conviction.DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.

MANELLA, J.

We concur:

EPSTEIN, P. J.

COLLINS, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 22, 2008

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK | * Branch       | Farmers & Merchants Bank, Timberville, Virginia, proposes to operate a courier service in Augusta County, and the cities of Staunton and Waynesboro, Virginia. | Newspaper:12/03/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 12/03/2008    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2009 (January 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us