alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 57.02-5 Filler metals. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, when filler metal is used in a welded fabrication that is required to meet the requirements of this part the filler metal must be one that has been approved by the American Bureau of Shipping.
( b ) In instances where a fabricator desires to use a filler metal which has not been approved by the American Bureau of Shipping the approval of the filler metal can be made by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection on the basis of the fabricator passing the weld procedure qualification tests as outlined in this part. This alternate means of approval applies to wire-gas and wire-flux combinations as well as to stick electrodes. Filler metal approvals given in this manner will extend only to the specific fabricator to whom they are granted.
[CGD 74-102, 40 FR 27460, June 30, 1975. Redesignated by CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35823, July 29, 1991]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24E
 
                           SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints JOSEPH HINES and CLARENCE J. BAUDHUIN, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 1997, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.
 
DATED: October 7, 1997
 
                                               /s/  MICHAEL S. LESSER
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                    MICHAEL S. LESSER
STATE OF ARIZONA
                               ss.
County of Maricopa
 
     On this 7th day of October, 1997, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally appeared MICHAEL S. LESSER, known to me to be the person whose name
is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the
same for the purposes therein contained.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
 
                                                 /s/  JANICE BACKUS
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Notary Public
 
My commission expires:
 
October 23, 1997
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The
Board of Directors FirstCity
Financial Corporation:  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-10345, 333-48671, 333-59333, 333-00623, 333-09485 and 333-124861) on Forms
S-3 and S-8 of FirstCity Financial Corporation, of our reports dated March 31,
2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of FirstCity Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which
reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
FirstCity Financial Corporation. Our reports refer to as of January 1,
2007, FirstCity Financial Corporations adoption of the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
and the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets  an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, and as of January 1,
2006, FirstCity Financial Corporations adoption of the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, and as of December 31, 2006, FirstCity Financial
Corporations adoption of the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year
Financial Statements, as discussed in note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements.  KPMG
LLP  Dallas,
Texas
March 31, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           172872
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         25538
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    172872
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                172872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (99283)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (99283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (99283)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Video
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Douglas T. Watson, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert Baker,
Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.		The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.		The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.



/s/ Douglas T. Watson				                   Douglas T. Watson
                   Chief Executive Officer
                   (Principal Executive Officer)

April 12, 2004

/s/ Robert Baker				                   Robert Baker
                   Chief Financial Officer
                   (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

April 12, 2004

---
Argued and submitted October 30, 1995,

affirmed January 3,

petition for review denied March 6, 1996 (322 Or 645)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*MICHAEL E. SIEGELBAUM, *Appellant.*

(DA 1014810; CA A88355)

909 P2d 886

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Phillips,*138 Or App 468, 909 P2d 882 (1996).
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NanoPierce
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2003, I, Kristi J. Kampmann,
Chief Financial Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for
          the  year ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  such  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
          NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2003, fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and
          results  of  operations  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.




                                      /s/Kristi J. Kampmann
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Kristi J. Kampmann,
                                        Chief Financial Officer


Date:      September  26,  2003



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
§ 67.123 Name and hailing port marking requirements. ( a ) For vessels other than those covered in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the name of the vessel must be marked on some clearly visible exterior part of the port and starboard bow and the stern of the vessel. The hailing port of the vessel must be marked on some clearly visible exterior part of the stern of the vessel.
( b ) *Vessels with square bow.* For vessels having a square bow, the name of the vessel must be marked on some clearly visible exterior part of the bow in a manner to avoid obliteration. The name and hailing port must be marked on some clearly visible exterior part of the stern.
( c ) *Recreational vessels.* For vessels documented exclusively for recreation, the name and hailing port must be marked together on some clearly visible exterior part of the hull.
( d ) The markings required by paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, which may be made by the use of any means and materials which result in durable markings, must be made in clearly legible letters of the Latin alphabet or Arabic or Roman numerals not less than four inches in height.
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
     Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
     that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
     30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
     that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


     Dated: August 8, 2006                     /s/ Jeffery Strickland
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Jeffery Strickland
                                               Chief Financial Officer




           The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C.
     ss. 1350 and not for any other purpose.


                                       23
Exhibit 23
                                                                to Form 10-K








                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                         -----------------------------

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
A.P. Green Industries, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
(No. 33-21012) on Form S-8 of A.P. Green Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of
our report dated February 9, 1996, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial position of A.P. Green Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended December 31, 1995, and the related schedule, which report appears
in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of A.P. Green Industries,
Inc.  Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for
postemployment benefits in 1994.

/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 26, 1996
§ 503.61 Conditions of disclosure. ( a ) Subject to the conditions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Commission shall not disclose any record which is contained in a system of records, by any means of communication, to any person or other agency who is not an individual to whom the record pertains.
( b ) Upon written request or with prior written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains, the Commission may disclose any such record to any person or other agency.
( c ) In the absence of a written consent from the individual to whom the record pertains, the Commission may disclose any such record, provided such disclosure is: ( 1 ) To those officers and employees of the Commission who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;
( 2 ) Required under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C 552);
( 3 ) For a routine use;
( 4 ) To the Bureau of Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity under the provisions of title 13 U.S.C.;
( 5 ) To a recipient who has provided the Commission with adequate advance written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;
( 6 ) To the National Archives of the United States, as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States government, or for evaluation by the Administrator of General Services or his designee to determine whether the record has such value;—
( 7 ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity authorized by law, provided the head of the agency or instrumentality has made a prior written request to the Secretary of the Commission specifying the particular record and the law enforcement activity for which it is sought;
( 8 ) To either House of Congress, and to the extent of a matter within its jurisdiction, any committee, subcommittee, or joint committee of Congress;
( 9 ) To the Comptroller General, or any authorized representative, thereof, in the course of the performance of the duties of the GAO; or
( 10 ) Under an order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984; 49 FR 47395, Dec. 4, 1984]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2528 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit period 

for certain open-loop biomass facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Mr. MEEK of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the credit period for certain open-loop biomass facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENDED CREDIT PERIOD FOR CERTAIN 

4 OPEN-LOOP BIOMASS FACILITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (ii) of section 45(b)(4)(B) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘5-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘10-year period’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2528 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to electricity produced 

3 and sold after December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 61.15-5 Steam piping. ( a ) Main steam piping must be subjected to a hydrostatic test equal to 1.25 times the maximum allowable working pressure at the same periods prescribed for boilers in § 61.05-10. The hydrostatic test must be applied from the boiler drum to the throttle valve. If the covering of the piping is not removed, the test pressure must be maintained on the piping for a period of ten minutes. If any evidence of moisture or leakage is detected, the covering must be removed, and the piping thoroughly examined.
( b ) All steam piping subject to pressure from the main boiler should be subjected to a hydrostatic test at a pressure of 1.25 times the maximum allowable working pressure of the boiler after every five years of service except as otherwise provided for in paragraph (a) of this section. Unless the covering of the piping is removed, the test pressure must be maintained on the piping for ten minutes. If any evidence of moisture or leakage is detected, the covering should be removed, and the piping thoroughly examined. No piping with a nominal size of 3 inches or less need be hydrostatically tested.
( c ) The setting of safety and relief valves installed in piping systems must be checked by the marine inspector at each inspection for certification for vessels whose Certificates of Inspection are renewed each year. For other vessels, the setting must be checked twice within any 5-year period, and no more than 3 years may elapse between any check and its immediate predecessor.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18890, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 73-248, 39 FR 30839, Aug. 26, 1974; CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24782, May 10, 1995; USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6500, Feb. 9, 2000]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-20457 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

DWAYNE DUPREE and 

SHAWN PEARSON, 

 Defendants. 

________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT 

SHAWN PEARSON’S MOTION TO STRIKE PROPOSED EXPERT 

TESTIMONY (ECF #93) 

On August 27, 2016, Defendant Shawn Pearson (“Pearson”) filed a motion 

to strike the proposed expert testimony of Government witness Joseph Jensen 

(“Jensen”) (the “Motion”). (See ECF #93.) In the alternative, Pearson asked the 

Court to adjourn the scheduled September 7, 2016, trial date to allow him to retain 

his own rebuttal expert. (See id.) The Court held a hearing on the Motion on 

September 6, 2016. 

For the reasons stated on the record at the September 6, 2016, hearing, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion (ECF #93) is GRANTED IN PART AND 

DENIED IN PART as follows. The Motion is DENIED to the extent that it seeks 

to exclude Jensen’s testimony on the grounds that the Government failed to 

2:15-cr-20457-MFL-APP Doc # 103 Filed 09/07/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 367
2

provide timely disclosure of Jensen’s anticipated testimony. The Motion is 

GRANTED to the extent it seeks an adjournment of the scheduled trial date to 

allow Pearson to retain his own rebuttal expert and to file a Daubert motion 

challenging Jensen’s proposed testimony. 

Counsel shall work together with the Court’s Case Manager to determine a 

date and time for a Daubert hearing with respect to Jensen’s testimony. Once a 

date and time for that hearing is determined, counsel shall file a stipulated order 

with the Court setting forth the briefing and hearing schedule for the Daubert 

motion. The stipulated order shall also memorialize the Speedy Trial Act waivers 

that were placed on the record on September 6, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 7, 2016 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on September 7, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cr-20457-MFL-APP Doc # 103 Filed 09/07/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 368