Use these links to rapidly review the documentFIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, DC 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009oro

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period
from                        to


Commission file number 033-19694



FirstCity Financial Corporation(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

76-0243729(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)6400 Imperial Drive, Waco, TX(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

76712(Zip Code)


(254) 761-2800(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which RegisteredCommon Stock, par value $.01

The NASDAQ Global Select Market


Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and
post such files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ý


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o    No ý

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 was $37,450,977 based on the closing
price of the common stock of $4.41 per share on such date as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

The
number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding at March 25, 2010 was 10,008,824.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates certain information by reference to the earlier filed of (i) an
amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or (ii) the definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.



---





Table of Contents



FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION  TABLE OF CONTENTS



PagePART IItem 1.

Business

5Item 1A.

Risk Factors

17Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

18Item 2.

Properties

18Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

18Item 4.

Reserved

19PART IIItem 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities

20Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

21Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

21Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

49Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

50Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure

127Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

127Item 9B.

Other Information

127PART IIIItem 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

129Item 11.

Executive Compensation

129Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters

129Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence

129Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

129PART IVItem 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

130Signatures

136


2

---





Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. In addition, we may make other written and oral communications from time to time that contain such statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are
forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expected financial position, future financial performance, overall trends, liquidity and capital needs, and other statements of
expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In this context, words such as
"anticipates," "believes," "expects," "estimates," "plans," "intends," "could," "should," "will," "may" and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and are not
historical facts.

These
forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions that affect our business, operating results and financial condition include, but are not limited
to:



3

---



Table of Contents



We
are also subject to other risks detailed herein or detailed from time-to-time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These listed risks
are not intended to be exhaustive and the order in which the risks appear is not intended as an indication of their relative weight or importance. We operate in continually changing business
environments, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. We cannot predict these new risk factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of these new risk factors on our business or the extent to
which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

You
are cautioned that our forward-looking statements could be wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which change over time. Actual results,
developments and outcomes may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, our forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement is made,
and we have no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements to reflect facts, circumstances, assumptions or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements
are made.

4

---





Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.Business.

General

FirstCity Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is a financial services company headquartered in Waco, Texas with offices
throughout the United States and Mexico and a presence in Europe and South America. When we refer to "FirstCity," "the Company," "we," "our" or "us" in this Form 10-K, we mean
FirstCity Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (consolidated). The Company engages in two major business segmentsPortfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution and Special Situations
Platform. The Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business has been the Company's core business segment since it commenced operations in 1986. In the Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution
business, the Company acquires portfolios of performing and non-performing loans and other assets, generally at a discount to their legal principal balances or appraised values, and
services and resolves such Portfolio Assets in an effort to maximize the present value of the ultimate cash recoveries. The Company engages in its Special Situations Platform business through its
majority ownership in a subsidiary that was formed in April 2007. Through its Special Situations Platform, the Company provides investment capital to privately-held middle-market companies
through flexible capital structuring arrangements to generate an attractive risk-adjusted return. These capital investments primarily take the form of senior and junior financing
arrangements, but also include direct equity investments, common equity warrants, distressed debt transactions, and leveraged buyouts.

The
Company became a publicly-held institution in July 1995 through its acquisition by merger of First City Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. ("FCBOT"), a former bank
holding company that had been engaged in a proceeding under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code since November 1992. As a result of the merger, the Company's common stock, $.01 par value per
share, became publicly held. In addition, as a result of the merger, the Company retained FCBOT's rights to approximately $597 million in net operating loss carryforwards, which the Company
uses to offset taxable income generated by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Access to Public Filings and Additional Information

FirstCity maintains an internet website at www.fcfc.com. Information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Stockholders of the Company and the public may access our periodic and current reports (including annual, quarterly and current reports on Form 10-K,
Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, respectively, and any amendments to those reports) as filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We make
this information available through the "Investors" section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with or furnish it to the SEC. This information
may be reviewed, downloaded and printed, free of charge, from our website at any time. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers, including the Company, that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

FirstCity
also provides public access to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the charters of the following committees of our Board of Directors: the Audit Committee, the
Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and committee charters may be viewed free of charge through the "Investors" link
of our website at www.fcfc.com.

Stockholders
of the Company and the public may obtain copies of any of these reports and documents free of charge by writing to: FirstCity Financial Corp., Attn: Investor Relations, 6400
Imperial Dr., Waco, Texas 76712.

5

---



Table of Contents

Overall Business Strategy

The Company has strategically aligned its operations into two major business segmentsthe Portfolio Asset Acquisition and
Resolution business and Special Situations Platform business. In the Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business, the Company acquires portfolios of performing and non-performing
loans and other assets (collectively, "Portfolio Assets" or "Portfolios"), generally at a discount to their legal principal balances or appraised values, and services and resolves such Portfolio
Assets in an effort to maximize the present value of the ultimate cash recoveries. FirstCity's entry into its Special Situations Platform business began in April 2007 with the formation of FirstCity
Denver Investment Corp. ("FirstCity Denver")a majority-owned subsidiary which was designed to provide the Company with another investment platform to leverage the skills and expertise of
management and other business partners by seeking out additional investment opportunities that align with the Company's overall business strategy. In the Special Situations Platform business,
FirstCity provides investment capital to privately-held middle-market companies through flexible capital structuring arrangements and focuses on restructurings, turnarounds, businesses
with robust market positions, and other special situations.

Although
we are operating in a challenging economic environment, both domestically and internationally, our primary objective remains to utilize the skills, experience and expertise of
our management and business partners by identifying, evaluating, pricing, acquiring, servicing and resolving Portfolio Assets to maximize ultimate cash collections; and to identify and invest capital
in middle-market investment opportunities that align with our overall business strategy. To enhance our
position in the specialty financial services industry, FirstCity's business strategies include the following:



6

---



Table of Contents

Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution Business Segment

In the Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business, the Company acquires Portfolio Assets, generally at a discount to their
legal principal balances or appraised values ("Face Value"), and services and resolves such Portfolio Assets in an effort to maximize the present value of the ultimate cash recoveries. The amounts
paid for the Portfolio Assets reflect FirstCity's determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to their underlying contractual terms.

The
Company began operating in the financial services business in 1986 as an acquirer of distressed assets from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Resolution Trust
Corporation. From its original office in Waco, Texas, with a staff of four professionals, the Company's asset acquisition and resolution business expanded to become a significant participant in the
financial services sector, an industry fueled by challenges experienced throughout the world. Through the years, the Company also began acquiring assets from healthy financial institutions interested
in eliminating non-performing assets from their portfolios.

FirstCity
acquires Portfolio Assets for its own account or through investment entities formed with one or more co-investors (each such entity, referred to as an "Acquisition
Partnership"). To date, FirstCity and the Acquisition Partnerships have acquired over $11.3 billion in Face Value of Portfolio Assets, with FirstCity's equity investment approximating
$880.2 million.



The purchase and resolution of underperforming and non-performing assets is an expanding industry that is driven by several
factors including:



Deteriorating
economic conditions in recent years have augmented the trend of financial institutions, government agencies and other sellers to package and sell asset portfolios to
investors (generally at a discount) as a means of disposing of non-performing loans or other surplus or non-strategic assets. Financial institutions are also selling
underperforming and non-performing assets to improve their regulatory capital positions (pursuant to state and federal regulations, commercial banks and insurance companies are generally
required to allocate more regulatory capital to underperforming and non-performing assets). Sales of such assets improve the seller's balance sheet (i.e. asset quality and capital
positions), reduce overhead costs, reduce staffing requirements, and avoid management and personnel distractions associated with the intensive and time-consuming task of resolving loans
and disposing of real estate.

More
recently, however, marketplace and legislative responses to the continued financial turmoil affecting the global banking systems and financial markets have resulted in a rise in the
number of financial institution consolidations and supply constraint caused by the sellers' reluctance to trade distressed assetswhich reduces the supply of distressed assets in the
marketplace. We believe, however, that as a result of the difficulty in servicing and resolving these underperforming and non-performing assets, and the desire of financial institutions,
government entities and other entities to

7

---



Table of Contents

shed
these assets for reasons described above, the supply of Portfolio Assets available for purchase will gradually increase over the coming years.



FirstCity acquires and manages Portfolio Assets, which are generally purchased at a discount to Face Value by FirstCity or through
Acquisition Partnerships. The Portfolio Assets are generally non-homogeneous assets, including loans of varying qualities that are unsecured or secured by diverse collateral types and real
estate. Some of the secured Portfolio Assets are loans for which resolution is tied primarily to the real estate securing the loan, while others may be collateralized business loans, the resolution of
which may be based either on real estate, business assets or other collateral cash flow.

FirstCity
seeks to resolve Portfolio Assets through (i) a negotiated settlement with the borrower in which the borrower pays all or a discounted amount of the loan,
(ii) conversion of the loan into a performing asset through extensive servicing efforts followed by either a sale of the loan to a third party or retention of the loan by FirstCity or the
Acquisition Partnerships, or (iii) foreclosure and sale of the collateral securing the loan.

FirstCity
has substantial experience acquiring, managing and resolving a wide variety of asset types and classes. As a result, it does not limit itself as to the types of Portfolio
Assets it will evaluate and purchase. FirstCity's willingness to acquire Portfolio Assets is generally determined by factors including the information that is available regarding the assets in a
Portfolio, the price at which the Portfolio can be acquired and the expected net cash flows from the resolution of such assets. FirstCity and the Acquisition Partnerships have acquired Portfolio
Assets in virtually all states throughout the U.S., and various countries in Europe and Latin America. FirstCity believes that its willingness to acquire non-homogeneous Portfolio Assets
without regard to geographic location provides it with an advantage over certain competitors that limit their activities to either a specific asset type or geographic location.

FirstCity
also seeks to capitalize on emerging opportunities in foreign countries in which the market for non-performing loans of the type generally purchased by FirstCity is
less efficient than the market for such assets in the United States. FirstCity has equity interests in European and Latin American servicing companies, and in conjunction with these servicing
entities, the Company actively pursues opportunities with the servicing entities' investors to purchase pools of Portfolio Assets in these regions.

The
following table presents selected data for the Portfolio Assets acquired by FirstCity:

Portfolio Assets Acquired

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Face Value

$
410,099

$
798,079Total purchase price

$
200,590

$
89,314Total invested

$
201,681

$
89,692FirstCity invested

$
147,654

$
72,307Total number of Portfolio Assets


776


417,207


8

---



Table of Contents

Portfolio Purchases by Region

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Purchase priceDomestic

$
200,590

$
64,394Europe





1,823Latin America





23,097Total

$
200,590

$
89,314FirstCity investedDomestic

$
147,654

$
64,408Europe





820Latin America





7,079Total

$
147,654

$
72,307


Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, the Company was involved in acquiring $14.1 million of Portfolio Assets with a Face Value of approximately
$22.3 millionof which FirstCity's investment share was $12.6 million.



FirstCity develops its Portfolio Asset opportunities through a variety of sources. Since the activities or contemplated activities of
expected sellers are generally publicized in industry publications and through other similar sources, FirstCity monitors such publications and similar sources. FirstCity also maintains relationships
with a variety of parties involved as sellers or as brokers or agents for sellers. Many of the brokers and agents concentrate by asset type and have become familiar with FirstCity's acquisition
criteria and periodically approach FirstCity with identified opportunities. In addition, business referrals from other investors in Acquisition Partnerships, repeat business from previous sellers,
focused marketing by FirstCity and the nationwide presence of FirstCity are important sources of business.

FirstCity
identifies investment opportunities in foreign markets in much the same manner as in the United States. In varying degrees of volume and efficiency, the markets of Europe and
Latin America all include sellers of non-performing assets. In some countries, such as Mexico, the government has taken a very active role in the management and orderly disposition of
these types of assets. FirstCity's established presence in Latin America and Europe provides a strong base for the identification, valuation, and acquisition of assets in those countries, as well as
in adjacent markets. FirstCity continues to identify partners who have contacts within various foreign markets and/or can assist in locating Portfolio Asset investment opportunities with FirstCity.



Prior to making an offer to acquire any Portfolio, FirstCity performs an extensive evaluation of the assets that comprise the
Portfolio. If, as is often the case, the Portfolio Assets are non-homogeneous, FirstCity evaluates all individual assets determined to be significant to the total of the proposed purchase.
If the Portfolio Assets are homogenous in nature, a sample of the assets comprising the Portfolio may be selected for evaluation. The evaluation of individual assets generally includes analyzing the
credit and collateral file or other due diligence information supplied by the seller. Based upon such seller-provided information, FirstCity undertakes additional evaluations of the asset, that, to
the extent permitted by the seller, include site visits to, and environmental reviews of the property

9

---



Table of Contents

securing
the loan or the asset proposed to be purchased. FirstCity also analyzes relevant local economic and market conditions based on information obtained from its prior experience in the market or
from other sources, such as local appraisers, real estate principals, realtors and brokers.

The
evaluation includes an analysis of an asset's projected cash flow and sources of repayment, including the availability of third party guarantees. FirstCity values loans (and other
assets included in a portfolio) on the basis of its estimate of the present value of estimated cash flow to be derived in the resolution process. Once the cash flow estimates for a proposed purchase
and the financing and partnership structure, if any, are finalized, FirstCity can complete the determination of its proposed purchase price for the targeted Portfolio Assets. Purchases are subject to
purchase and sale agreements between the seller and the purchasing affiliate of FirstCity.

The
analysis and underwriting procedure in foreign markets follows the same extensive diligence philosophy as that employed by the Company domestically. Additional risks are evaluated in
foreign markets, including economic factors (inflation or deflation), currency strength, short and long-term market stability and political concerns. These risks are evaluated and priced
into the cost of the acquisition.



After a Portfolio is acquired, FirstCity assigns the Portfolio Assets to account servicing officers who are independent of the
personnel that performed the due diligence evaluation in connection with the purchase of the Portfolio. Portfolio Assets are serviced either at the Company's headquarters or in one of FirstCity's
other offices. FirstCity may establish servicing operations in locations in close proximity to significant concentrations of Portfolio Assets. Such offices are reviewed for closing after the assets in
the geographic region surrounding the office are substantially resolved. The assigned account servicing officer develops a business plan and budget for each asset based upon an independent review of
the cash flow projections developed during the investment evaluation, physical inspections of assets or collateral underlying the related loans, evaluation of local market conditions and discussions
with the relevant borrower. Budgets are periodically reviewed and revised as necessary. FirstCity employs loan-tracking software and other operational systems that are generally similar to
systems used by commercial banks, but which have been enhanced to track both the collected and the projected cash flows from Portfolio Assets.

The
Company does not recognize capitalized servicing rights related to its Portfolio Assets because servicing is not contractually separated from the underlying assets by sale or
securitization of the assets with servicing retained or separate purchase or assumption of the servicing, and FirstCity does not have the risks and rewards of ownership of the servicing rights.
FirstCity services, in all material respects, the Portfolio Assets owned for its own account, the Portfolio Assets owned by the Acquisition Partnerships and, to a very limited extent, certain
Portfolio Assets owned by third parties. In connection with the Acquisition Partnerships in the United States, FirstCity generally earns a servicing fee, which is a percentage of gross cash
collections generated rather than a management fee based on the Face Value of the asset being serviced. The rate of servicing fee charged is generally a function of the average Face Value of the
assets within each pool being serviced (the larger the average Face Value of the assets in a Portfolio, the lower the fee percentage within the prescribed range), the type of assets and the level of
servicing required on each asset. For the Mexican Acquisition Partnerships, FirstCity earns a servicing fee based on costs of servicing plus a profit margin. The Company also has certain consulting
contracts with its Mexican investment entities pursuant to which the Company is entitled to additional compensation for servicing once a specified return to the investors has been achieved. The
Acquisition Partnerships in Europe and South America are serviced by various entities in which the Company maintains an equity interest in the servicing entities. In all cases, service fees are
recognized as they are earned in accordance with the servicing agreements.

10

---



Table of Contents



In connection with the Company's lending activities relative to U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") loan programs, the Company
recognizes servicing assets through the sale of originated or purchased loans when servicing rights are retained. The Company generally recognizes and measures at fair value purchased servicing rights
and servicing rights obtained from the sale of SBA loans previously originated or purchased. The Company subsequently measures the servicing assets by using the amortization method, which amortizes
servicing assets in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. The amortization of the servicing assets is analyzed periodically and is adjusted to reflect changes in
prepayment rates and other estimates.



Portfolio Assets are either acquired for the account of a FirstCity subsidiary or through the Acquisition Partnerships. Portfolio
Assets acquired directly by a FirstCity subsidiary may be funded with equity financing provided by a third party lender, loans made by
FirstCity to its subsidiaries, and/or other secured debt that is recourse only to the FirstCity subsidiary acquiring the Portfolio Assets. Portfolio Assets owned directly by an Acquisition Partnership
may be funded with equity contributions, loans made by a co-investor and/or FirstCity or one of its subsidiaries, financing provided by third parties, and/or other secured debt that is
recourse only to the Acquisition Partnership.

Each
domestic Acquisition Partnership is a separate legal entity, (generally a limited partnership, but may also take the form of a limited liability company, trust, corporation or other
type of legal business structure). FirstCity and an investor typically form a new special-purpose entity that owns the Acquisition Partnership. Generally, for a majority of the domestic
Acquisition Partnerships, FirstCity and another investor each have an effective 50% ownership interest in the domestic Acquisition Partnership.

In
foreign markets, FirstCity evaluates the establishment of the Acquisition Partnership ownership structures and in conjunction with its co-investors, performs significant
due diligence and planning on the tax, licensing, and other ownership issues of the particular country. As in the United States, each foreign Acquisition Partnership is a separate legal entity,
generally formed as the equivalent of a limited liability company or a liquidating trust. For the European and Latin American Acquisition Partnerships, FirstCity generally has an effective ownership
interest in the underlying entities ranging from 10%-50%.

When
Acquisition Partnerships are funded with acquisition financing, the debt is usually secured only by the assets of the individual entity, and are nonrecourse to the Company, its
co-investors and the other Acquisition Partnerships. FirstCity believes that this legal structure insulates the Company and the other Acquisition Partnerships from certain potential risks,
while permitting FirstCity to share in the economic benefits of each Acquisition Partnership.

Senior
secured acquisition financing by Bank of Scotland plc provides all of the financing for funding of purchase of Portfolio Assets by FH Partners LLC ("FH Partners"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity (see "Relationship with Bank of Scotland" below). Purchases of Portfolio Assets by other FirstCity subsidiaries may be financed by senior secured acquisition
financing provided by FirstCity or other lenders. Purchases of Portfolio Assets by Acquisition Partnerships may be financed by senior secured acquisition financing provided by FirstCity and/or other
investors or secured financing provided by other third party lenders. Senior acquisition financing is obtained at variable interest rates with negotiated spreads to the base rates. The terms of the
senior acquisition debt of the Acquisition Partnerships often allow, under certain conditions, distributions to equity partners before the debt is repaid in full.

11

---



Table of Contents

Prior
to maturity of any senior acquisition debt, the Acquisition Partnerships typically refinance the senior acquisition debt with long-term debt secured by the assets of
the partnership. Such long-term debt generally accrues interest at a lower rate than the senior acquisition debt, has collateral terms similar to the senior acquisition debt, and permits
distributions of excess cash flow generated by the Acquisition Partnership to the equity partners so long as the partnership is in compliance with applicable financial covenants.



Cargill, Inc., an international provider of food, agricultural and risk management products and services, and certain of its
affiliates, are investors in a majority of our domestic and European Acquisition Partnerships. Cargill, Inc. is generally regarded as one of the world's largest privately-held
corporations. Although management believes that our relationship with Cargill is excellent, there can be no assurance that such relationship will continue in the future. FirstCity is not dependent on
Cargill or its affiliates for future liquidity or funding.

American
International Group, Inc. ("AIG"), an international insurance organization, and certain of its affiliates are investors in a substantial majority of our Latin American
Acquisition Partnerships. Although management believes that our relationship with AIG is excellent, there can be no assurance that such relationship will continue in the future. The Company is not
dependent on AIG for future liquidity or funding.



FirstCity has a significant relationship with Bank of Scotland plc ("Bank of Scotland") and its subsidiaries. Since 1997, Bank
of Scotland and certain of its affiliates have provided credit facilities to FirstCity and its subsidiaries.

Bank
of Scotland provides FirstCity and its subsidiaries a loan facility under a revolving credit agreement to finance the senior debt and equity portion of portfolio and asset
purchases, provide for the issuance of letters of credit, and for working capital loans. The maximum available commitment under this revolving credit facility was $225.0 million at
December 31, 2009. This facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of FirstCity and certain of its subsidiaries, and guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's wholly-owned
subsidiaries.

FH
Partners has a $100.0 million revolving credit facility with Bank of Scotland to finance portfolio and asset purchases consummated by FH Partners. This facility is secured by
all assets of FH Partners and guaranteed by FirstCity and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

In
addition, FirstCity has a $25.0 million subordinated credit agreement with BoS(USA), Inc. ("BoS(USA)"), a subsidiary of Bank of Scotland, which may be used to finance
equity investments in new ventures, equity investments made in connection with portfolio and asset purchases and loans made by FirstCity and its subsidiaries to acquisition entities, provide for the
issuance of letters of credit, and for working capital loans. This credit agreement is guaranteed by substantially all of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of FirstCity and secured by substantially all of
the assets of FirstCity and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

In
connection with a previous financing arrangement, FirstCity issued a warrant to BoS(USA) to purchase 425,000 shares of the Company's voting common stock at $2.3125 per share. This
warrant also entitled BoS(USA) to additional warrants under certain specific situations to retain its ability to own approximately 4.86% of the Company's voting common stock. The warrant expired on
December 31, 2009 without being exercised.

Refer
to Notes 2 and 8 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional details and terms underlying the Company's loan facilities with the Bank of Scotland
and BoS(USA).

12

---



Table of Contents



Historically, FirstCity has leveraged its expertise in asset resolution and servicing by investing in a wide variety of asset types
across a broad geographic scope. FirstCity continues to follow this investment strategy and seeks expansion opportunities into new asset classes and geographic areas when it believes it can achieve
attractive risk adjusted returns. The following items are significant elements of FirstCity's business strategy in the portfolio acquisition and resolution business:



Special Situations Platform Business Segment

FirstCity's entry into its Special Situations Platform business began in 2007 with the formation of FirstCity Denvera
majority-owned subsidiary which was designed to provide the Company with another investment platform to leverage the skills and expertise of management and other business partners by seeking out
additional investment opportunities that align with the Company's overall business strategy. In the Special Situations Platform business, FirstCity Denver provides investment capital to
privately-held middle-market companies through flexible capital structuring arrangements. FirstCity Denver's primary investment objective is to generate both current income and capital
appreciation through debt and equity investments, and to generally structure the investments to be repaid or exited in 12 to 36 months. We invest primarily in U.S. middle-market companies,
where we believe the supply of primary capital is limited and the investment opportunities are most attractive.

Our
investment opportunities in middle-market companies target restructurings, turnarounds, businesses with robust market positions, and other special situations. The nature of our
capital investments primarily take the form of senior and junior financing arrangements, but also include direct equity investments, common equity warrants, distressed debt transactions, and leveraged
buyouts. The composition of our investments will change over time given our views on, among other factors, the economic and credit environments that impact our operations.

To
date, FirstCity Denver has been involved in middle-market transactions with total investment values approximating $71.1 million. In connection with these investments, FirstCity
Denver provided $43.9 million of investment capital to privately-held middle-market companies$34.3 million in the form of debt investments and
$9.6 million as equity investments. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, FirstCity Denver invested an additional $4.6 million in the form of debt investments.

13

---





Table of Contents



We believe the environment for investing in middle-market companies is attractive for the following reasons:



FirstCity Denver has established an extensive referral network comprised of investment bankers, private equity firms, trade
organizations, commercial bankers, attorneys, businesses and financial brokers. Our origination efforts include calling on and visiting these contacts and other middle-market intermediaries to
generate deal flow. In addition, we maintain an extensive database of middle-market professionals and participants, which enables us to monitor and evaluate the middle-market investing environment.
This database is used to help us assess whether we are penetrating our target markets and to accurately track terms and pricing. We expect that our ability to leverage these relationships and
transaction information will continue to result in the referral of investment opportunities to us.



FirstCity Denver chooses investments based on the investment experience of its professionals and a detailed investment analysis for
each investment opportunity. We selectively narrow prospective investment opportunities through a process designed to identify the most attractive opportunities. We follow a rigorous process based
on:



We
seek to identify companies that exhibit superior fundamental risk-reward profiles and strong defensible business franchises while focusing on the relative value of the
security in the company's capital structure.



If an investment opportunity merits pursuit, FirstCity Denver engages in an intensive due diligence process that involves extensive
research into the target company, its management, its industry, its

14

---



Table of Contents

growth
prospects, and its ability to withstand adverse conditions. Though each transaction involves a somewhat different approach, the due diligence steps that we generally undertake
include:



After
completion of the due diligence process, the investment team involved in the transaction prepares a written investment analysis. Senior management involved in the transaction
reviews the analysis, and if they are in favor of making the potential investment, the analysis is then presented to the investment committee for consideration. After an investment has been approved
by the investment committee, a more-extensive due diligence process is employed by the transaction team. Additional due diligence with respect to any investment may be conducted on our
behalf by attorneys, independent
accountants, and other third-party consultants and research firms prior to the closing of the investment, as appropriate on a case-by-case basis.



FirstCity Denver's investments in middle-market companies primarily take the form of first- and second-lien loans and
mezzanine debt. We tailor the terms of our debt investments to the facts and circumstances of the transaction and the prospective company, negotiating a structure that aims to protect our rights and
manage our risk while creating incentives for the company to achieve its business plan and improve its profitability.

For
first- and second-lien senior loans, we generally obtain security interests in the company's assets that will serve as collateral in support of repayment of loans. This
collateral may take the form of first- or second-priority liens on the assets of the company.

We
generally structure our mezzanine investments as subordinated loans that provide for relatively high, fixed interest rates that provide us with significant current income. These loans
typically have interest-only payments in the early months, with amortization of principal deferred to the later term of the loans. In addition, our mezzanine investments will generally be
collateralized by a subordinate lien on some or all of the assets of the company.

In
some cases, our debt investments may provide for a portion of the interest payable to be payment-in-kind interest. To the extent interest is
payment-in-kind, it will be payable through the increase of the principal amount of the loan by the amount of interest due on the then-outstanding aggregate
principal amount of the loan.

In
general, our debt investments include financial covenants and terms that require the company to reduce leverage over time, thereby enhancing credit quality. These methods may include,
among other

15

---



Table of Contents

things:
(i) maintenance leverage covenants; (ii) maintenance cash flow covenants; and (iii) indebtedness incurrence prohibitions. In addition, limitations on asset sales and
capital expenditures prevent a company from changing the nature of its business or capitalization without our consent.

Our
debt investments may include equity features, such as carried interests and warrants to obtain or buy a minority interest in the company. Carried equity interests and warrants that
we receive in connection with our debt investments may require only a nominal cost to obtain or exercise, and thus, as the middle-market company appreciates in value, we may achieve additional
investment returns from these equity interests. In addition, our equity investments occasionally take the form of direct control-oriented investments in connection with buyout transactions.



FirstCity Denver's investment activities are funded primarily by borrowings made on the Company's $225.0 million revolving
credit facility with Bank of Scotland and the $25.0 million subordinated credit agreement with BoS(USA). We intend to continue borrowing under these facilities to finance future capital
investments consummated by FirstCity Denver. Refer to Notes 2 and 8 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional details and terms underlying the Company's loan
facilities with the Bank of Scotland and BoS(USA).

Government Regulation

Certain aspects of the Company's business are subject to regulation under various domestic federal, state and local statutes and
regulations and various foreign laws and regulations that impose requirements and restrictions affecting, among other things, disclosures to obligors, the terms of secured transactions, collection,
repossession and claims handling procedures, multiple qualification and licensing requirements for conducting business in various jurisdictions, and other trade practices. Additional laws and
regulations, or amendment to existing laws and regulations, may be enacted that could impose additional restrictions on the servicing and collection of Portfolio Assets and other
receivableswhich in turn could adversely impact our ability to realize the carrying value of these assets.

Competition



The Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business is highly competitive. Some of the Company's principal competitors are
substantially larger and have considerably greater financial resources than the Company. As such, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available
to us. In addition, some competitors may be better-suited than the Company to acquire Portfolio Assets, to pursue new business opportunities, or to survive periods of industry consolidation.
Generally, there are three aspects of the distressed asset acquisition and resolution business: due diligence, Portfolio management, and servicing. The Company is a major participant in all three
arenas. In comparison, certain of our competitors have historically competed primarily as portfolio purchasers and have customarily engaged other parties to conduct due diligence on potential
purchases and to service acquired assets, and certain other competitors have historically competed primarily as servicing companies.

The
Company believes that its ability to acquire, service and resolve Portfolio Assets for its own account and through Acquisition Partnerships will be a significant component of the
Company's overall future growth. Portfolio Asset acquisitions are often based on competitive biddingwhich involves the risks of bidding too low (which generates no business) or bidding
too high (which could result in the purchase of a Portfolio at an economically unattractive price).

16

---



Table of Contents



The Company's primary competition to provide financing to middle-market companies includes public and private funds, commercial and
investment banks, commercial financing companies, insurance companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds. Many of our existing and potential
competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding
sources that are not available to us. In addition, some competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and
establish more relationships than us. We use industry information available to our investment management team to assess investment risks and determine appropriate pricing for our investments in
middle-market companies. Furthermore, we believe the relationships of our professionals enable us to learn about, and compete effectively for, investment opportunities with attractive middle-market
companies in the industries in which we seek to invest.

Employees

The Company had 365 employees as of December 31, 2009, including 97 employees attributable to a radio broadcast equipment
manufacturing company that FirstCity Denver acquired on December 11, 2009 (refer to Note 3 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional information on this
transaction). The Company had 265 employees at December 31, 2008. FirstCity believes that it has been successful in attracting quality employees and that employee relations are good.

Foreign Operations

We have investments in various Acquisition Partnerships and servicing entities in Europe and Latin America. Revenues outside of the
U.S. are a material part of our business, as they accounted for more than 16% of our consolidated revenues and equity in earnings of subsidiaries for each of the fiscal years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008. See Note 18 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for summarized information relating to the Company's foreign revenues.

The
Company has determined that the local currency is the functional currency for its operations outside the United States (primarily Europe and Latin America). We translate the results
for our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates from the designated functional currency to the U.S. dollar using average exchange rates during the relevant period, while we translate assets and
liabilities at the exchange rate in effect at the reporting date. Since our revenues in foreign operations are denominated in non-U.S. currencies, fluctuations in exchange rates relative
to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and assets. In addition, changes in exchange rates associated with U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities result
in foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

Since
we report our results of operations in U.S. dollars, changes in relative foreign currency valuations from our foreign operations may result in reductions in our reported revenues,
operating income and earnings, as well as a reduction in the carrying value of our foreign-related assets. Accordingly, if the values of local currencies in foreign countries in which certain of our
subsidiaries and affiliates conduct business depreciate relative to the U.S. dollar, we would expect our operating results in future periods, and the value of our assets held in local currencies, to
be adversely impacted.

Refer
to Note 18 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for financial information on our revenues and assets by geographic area.

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to
provide information required by this Item.

17

---



Table of Contents

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.Properties.

The Company occupies approximately 65,000 square feet of office space and 89,000 square feet of manufacturing plant facilities, all of
which is leased. The following is a list as of December 31, 2009 of the principal physical properties that are used by our significant business segments.

Location

Purpose

Business SegmentWaco, Texas

Corporate and Servicing Offices

Corporate and Portfolio Asset Acquisition and ResolutionGuadalajara, Mexico

Servicing Offices

Portfolio Asset Acquisition and ResolutionMexico City, Mexico

Servicing Offices

Portfolio Asset Acquisition and ResolutionDallas, Texas

Servicing Offices

Portfolio Asset Acquisition and ResolutionSao Paulo, Brazil

Servicing Offices

Portfolio Asset Acquisition and ResolutionGreenwood Village, Colorado

Servicing Offices

Special Situations PlatformQuincy, Illinois

Office and Manufacturing Facility

Special Situations Platform


The Company leases its principal executive offices and primary domestic servicing offices under a non-cancellable operating lease,
which expires December 31, 2011. All other office and facility leases of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries expire in various years through 2016. We believe that these facilities are
suitable and adequate for the business that we currently conduct. However, we periodically review our space requirements and may acquire new space to meet the needs of our business, or consolidate and
dispose of facilities that are no longer required.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

FirstCity and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates (including Acquisition Partnerships) are involved in various claims and legal
proceedings which are incidental to the ordinary course of our business. We initiate lawsuits against borrowers and are occasionally countersued by them in such actions. From time to time, other types
of lawsuits are brought against us. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of pending legal actions and proceedings, the Company cannot state with certainty the eventual outcome
of any such proceedings. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that liabilities, if any, arising from any ordinary
course proceeding will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, operations, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.



On January 19, 2005, Prudential Financial, Inc. ("Prudential") filed a petition in interpleader seeking to interplead
321,211 shares of Prudential common stock and any associated dividends arising from the demutualization of Prudential in December 2000. The shares of Prudential common stock related to group annuity
contracts purchased by First-City National Bank of Houston, as trustee of the First City Bancorporation Employee Retirement Trust (the "Trust") to fund obligations to participants in the
First City Bancorporation Employee Retirement Plan (the "Plan") in connection with termination of the Plan and the Trust in 1987. FirstCity, FCLT Loans Asset Corp. ("FCLT"), an alleged assignee of the
FirstCity Liquidating Trust, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association ("JP Morgan"), and First-City National Bank of Houston as trustee of the Trust were made defendants in
the suit as claimants to the Prudential common stock and dividends. An agreed order dated January 27, 2005, was entered by the Court providing that the Prudential common stock be transferred to
JP Morgan as record owner and that JP Morgan sell the stock. The January 27, 2005 order also provided that the proceeds from the sale be held by JP Morgan pending
resolution, by agreement or court order, of all conflicting claims to the proceeds. JP Morgan advised that the Prudential common

18

---



Table of Contents

stock
was sold on January 28, 2005 for total proceeds of approximately $17.5 million. JP Morgan also received funds in the amount of approximately $489,000, which were dividend
payments related to the Prudential common stock. JP Morgan filed a third party action naming Timothy J. Blair as a third party defendant with an alleged interest in the demutualization
proceeds. On October 1, 2005, the court certified a class represented by Mr. Blair.

Following
various court rulings and mediation proceedings, on September 25, 2009, FirstCity, FCLT and Mr. Blair, individually and as representative of a class of former
employee beneficiaries, entered into an Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement, subject to court approval, which provided for the settlement of the pending lawsuit related to the ownership of
demutualization proceeds from the sale of Prudential stock and dividends interpled by Prudential. The settlement provided for each party to receive one-third of the demutualization
proceeds, which totaled approximately $18.6 million at the time of settlement, net of approximately $0.3 million that JP Morgan will retain to pay fees, expenses and tax payments.
On December 22, 2009, the parties reached final settlement and FirstCity received approximately $6.1 million as its share of the settlement proceeds. The final settlement is
non-appealable, and each party released the other parties from all claims related to the lawsuit.



On March 20, 2007, Superior Funding, Inc., Wave Tec Pools, Inc. and Nations Pool Supply, Inc. (collectively
"Plaintiffs") filed a First Amended Petition adding FH Partners (formerly FH Partners, L.P.) and FirstCity Servicing Corporation, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, and
FirstCity Financial Corporation as defendants in a suit filed by Plaintiffs against State Bank and Cole Harmonson. FirstCity Financial Corporation was served with Plaintiff's Notice of Nonsuit Without
Prejudice in the suit on April 25, 2007. Grandview Homes, Inc. was subsequently added as an additional plaintiff. The Plaintiffs' claims relate to alleged breaches by FH Partners
and FirstCity Servicing Corporation in connection with a loan agreement related to a loan from State Bank to Plaintiffs that was purchased by FH Partners from State Bank on December 22,
2006. The Plaintiffs allege that they entered into a loan or line of credit with State Bank and that due to an error by State Bank the Plaintiffs borrowed more on the line of credit than was allowed
under the borrowing base which State Bank agreed would be cured if the Plaintiffs pledged additional property to secure the loans. Plaintiffs allege that State Bank, and subsequently
FH Partners, have refused to honor the agreement by State Bank concerning the pledge of the additional property. Plaintiffs allege that they have sustained actual damages of $165 million
as a result of the joint actions of State Bank, Cole Harmonson, FH Partners and FirstCity Servicing Corporation. The Plaintiffs additionally seek recovery of statutory penalties and attorney's
fees. Plaintiffs additionally assert that FH Partners and FirstCity were aware of State Bank's wrongful conduct and continued to engage in it and that the Plaintiffs were obligated to mitigate
their damages. On October 9, 2007, FH Partners filed a collection suit against the Plaintiffs and guarantors to recover the balance of the debt owed under the loans and to realize upon
the security interests securing the loans. On September 25, 2009, the Plaintiffs filed a non-suit without prejudice of FH Partners and FirstCity Servicing Corporation in the
original suit filed against State Bank and other parties. The claims in the original suit have been raised as counterclaims in the collection suit initiated by FH Partners. Trial has been set
in the collection suit for August 2, 2010. FirstCity does not have sufficient information to estimate any potential liability or probability of liability, but is unaware of any factual or legal
basis for liability. Given the magnitude of the Plaintiffs' wrongdoing and the lack of any evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of FirstCity or FH Partners, management believes that an
unfavorable outcome in the lender liability suit seems remote.

Item 4.Reserved.

19

---





Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The Company's common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol FCFC. The number of holders of record of
common stock on March 25, 2010 was approximately 694, as provided by American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, the Company's transfer agent. The following table displays the high and low sales
prices for the Company's common stock for the periods indicated:

2009

2008Market Price

Market PriceQuarter Ended

High

Low

High

LowMarch 31

$
5.92

$
0.88

$
9.02

$
5.55June 30


5.25


1.94


6.85


3.71September 30


8.75


4.44


6.85


2.78December 31


9.00


6.36


5.50


1.75


The
Company has never declared or paid a dividend on the common stock. The Company currently intends to retain future earnings to finance its growth and development and therefore does
not anticipate that it will declare or pay any dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to payment of dividends will be made at the discretion of the Board
of Directors of the Company and will depend upon the Company's operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and such other factors that the Board of
Directors deems relevant. Certain loan facilities to which the Company and its subsidiaries are parties contain restrictions relating to the payment of dividends and other distributions.

The
following table presents information about our purchases of our common shares during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009:

Month

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased(1)

Average
Price Paid
Per Share

Total Number
of Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs

Maximum Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or ProgramsOctober




$





$
November




$






December


35,363

$
7.44





Total


35,363

$
7.44




$



(1)Represents
the acquisition of 35,363 already-owned common shares that were tendered by Company employees to satisfy the prices attributable to stock option
exercises under FirstCity's equity compensation plans.


20

---





Table of Contents

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009 with respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Company's
equity compensation plans:

Plan Category

Number of Shares
to Be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options

Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options

Number of Shares
Remaining Available
for Future IssuanceEquity compensation plans approved by stockholders


921,400

$
7.10


103,500
(1)Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders








Total


921,400

$
7.10


103,500


(1)Issuable
shares of our common stock available under the Company's 2006 Stock Option and Award Plan.


At
the 2009 annual meeting of FirstCity stockholders held on November 13, 2009, the stockholders approved the 2010 Stock Option and Award Plan. This plan will enable the Company
to make stock awards up to a total of 300,000 common shares (net of shares cancelled and forfeited) in various forms and combinations including stock options, performance shares and restricted stock.
The 2010 Stock Option and Award Plan will become effective on April 1, 2010 (i.e. the shares were not available for issuance at December 31, 2009).

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to
provide information required by this Item.

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
(including the Notes thereto) included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

FirstCity is a financial services company that engages in two major business segmentsPortfolio Asset Acquisition and
Resolution and Special Situations Platform. The Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business has been the Company's core business segment since it commenced operations in 1986. In the Portfolio
Asset Acquisition and Resolution business, the Company acquires portfolios of performing and non-performing loans and other assets (collectively, "Portfolio Assets" or "Portfolios"),
generally at a discount to their legal principal balances or appraised values, and services and resolves such Portfolio Assets in an effort to maximize the present value of the ultimate cash
recoveries. Through its Special Situations Platform, the Company provides investment capital to privately-held middle-market companies through flexible capital structuring arrangements to
generate an attractive risk-adjusted return. These capital investments primarily take the form of senior and junior financing arrangements,
but also include direct equity investments, common equity warrants, distressed debt transactions, and leveraged buyouts.

The
declines in global economic conditions that began in 2008 continued through 2009. Despite the challenging economic environment, FirstCity recorded net income of $18.7 million,
or $1.83 per diluted share, in 2009 (compared to a net loss of $46.7 million, or ($4.55) per diluted share, in 2008). Revenue streams generated by the Company's earning assets and servicing
platform positively impacted

21

---



Table of Contents

earnings
in 2009as revenues increased to $79.8 million in 2009 compared to $45.2 million in 2008. The Company's revenues in 2009 included $53.8 million of gains and
income from Portfolio Assets; $7.1 million of interest income and gains from loans receivable; and $3.1 million of revenue attributable to our majority-owned railroad operations. The
Company's net earnings increase for the fiscal year ended 2009 compared to the fiscal year ended 2008 was also positively impacted by a $15.1 million decrease in net impairment provisions; a
$2.3 million increase in foreign currency transaction gains; an $18.0 million decrease in income tax expense; and $6.1 million of other income recorded by FirstCity in the fourth
quarter of 2009 in connection with the settlement of a lawsuit (refer to Note 21 of our 2009 consolidated financial statements).

Components
of FirstCity's results of operations for the fiscal years ended 2009 and 2008 are detailed below (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

Year Ended December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution

$
18,260

$
(21,834
)Special Situations Platform


1,756


1,888Operating contribution (loss)


20,016


(19,946
)Corporate overhead


(1,272
)

(26,729
)Net earnings (loss) attributable to FirstCity

$
18,744

$
(46,675
)Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

$
1.83

$
(4.55
)


In
2009, the Company was involved in acquiring $200.6 million of Portfolio Assets with a Face Value of approximately $410.1 millionof which FirstCity's
investment share was $147.7 million (all in the United States). In addition to its Portfolio Asset acquisitions in 2009, FirstCity invested $21.6 million in the form of SBA loan
originations and advances; $11.2 million the form of equity investments (European Acquisition Partnerships); and $1.1 million of other investments. FirstCity was also involved in
$20.0 million of debt and equity investments in 2009 under its Special Situations Platform ("FirstCity Denver")of which FirstCity's investment share was $12.4 million.
FirstCity's total investment level in 2009 was $193.9 million compared to $125.2 million in 2008. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, the Company was involved in acquiring
$14.1 million of Portfolio Assets with a face value of approximately $22.3 million (of which FirstCity's investment share was $12.6 million) and invested $10.9 million in
the form of debt and equity investments.

At
December 31, 2009, the carrying value of FirstCity's earning assets (primarily Portfolio Assets, equity investments, loans receivable, and entity-level earning assets)
approximated $366.2 millioncompared to $296.3 million a year ago. The global distribution of FirstCity's earning assets (at carrying value) at December 31, 2009
included $267.1 million in the United States; $57.9 million in Europe; and $41.2 million in Latin America.



The Company incurred $10.8 million of net impairment provisions in 2009 (including $5.5 million in the fourth quarter of
2009)comprised of $5.3 million of net provisions recorded to our consolidated loans and portfolios, and $5.5 million as our share of net impairment provisions recorded to
loans and portfolios held in our unconsolidated Acquisition Partnerships. The global distribution of the $10.8 million net impairment provisions recorded by the Company in 2009 includes
$9.3 million in the United States, $1.0 million in Latin America, and $0.5 million in Europe. These impairment provisions were attributed primarily to declines in values of loan
collateral and real estate assets in our domestic loans and portfolios. The impairment provisions were identified in connection with

22

---



Table of Contents

management's
quarterly evaluation of the collectability of the Company's Portfolio Assets and loans receivable. The process for evaluating and measuring impairment is critical to our financial
results, as it requires subjective and complex judgments due to the need to make estimates about the impact of matters that are uncertain. This process also requires estimates that are susceptible to
significant revision as more information becomes available. It remains unclear what impact the illiquid markets, real estate value declines and the overall economic slowdown will ultimately have on
our financial results. These conditions could adversely impact our business if borrowers cannot refinance their loans and/or continue to make paymentswhich in turn could lead to rising
loan defaults and foreclosures on loan collateral. Therefore, we cannot provide assurance that, in any particular period, we will not incur additional impairment provisions in the future.



The combined impact of foreign currency transactions from the Company's consolidated and unconsolidated foreign operations resulted in
a $47,000 foreign currency transaction gain in 2009 (compared to a combined impact of a $2.2 million foreign currency transaction loss in 2008). It remains unclear what impact that weakened
global economic conditions will have on our financial holdings and investments from our European and Latin American operations. As such, we
cannot provide assurance that, in any particular period, we will not incur foreign currency transaction losses in the future.



Despite substantial losses reported in the financial services sector over the past two years and continued weaknesses in U.S. and
global economies and financial markets, management remains positive on the outlook of the Company. Management believes that current market conditions should not hinder FirstCity's ability to expand
its business, and that distressed asset acquisition and middle-market transaction opportunities at attractive prices and returns are available. As mentioned above, FirstCity's investment level
increased to $193.9 million in 2009 from $125.2 million in 2008comprising a $68.7 million increase. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2009, the Company
has been involved in acquiring $14.1 million of Portfolio Assets with a Face Value of approximately $22.3 million (of which FirstCity's investment share was $12.6 million) and
invested $10.9 million in the form of debt and equity investments.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FirstCity entered into amendments to its existing loan facilities with Bank of Scotland and BoS(USA) (collectively, "Bank of Scotland") that
extended the maturity dates of the debt outstanding under these loan agreements to April 1, 2011. The credit amendments did not change the other primary terms and covenants of these loan
facilities.

FirstCity
is very cognizant of the current terms of its primary credit facilities, as amended, with Bank of Scotland and the distressed condition of the U.S. financial markets that
currently presents challenges for businesses in accessing liquidity. As such, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland continue negotiations relating to a long-term restructuring agreement that
would, among other things, extend the maturity date of this debt beyond April 1, 2011. The Company is in the process of negotiating a 3-year term loan that allows for repayment to
Bank of Scotland over time as cash flows from the underlying assets securing the loan facilities are realized. It is anticipated that the term loan would allow the Company to use its current liquidity
and certain levels of cash flow to fund its overhead expenses and future investments. FirstCity will continue to actively pursue alternative funding sources with other parties to provide equity and/or
debt financing to support the Company's future investment activities. There can be no assurances that FirstCity will close on a long-term restructuring agreement with Bank of Scotland for
its loan facilities on terms that are acceptable to the Company, or that FirstCity will be able to obtain alternative sources of funding on acceptable terms, if at all.

23

---



Table of Contents

Results of Operations

As a result of significant period-to-period fluctuations in our revenues and earnings,
period-to-period comparisons of the results of our operations may not be meaningful. The Company's financial results are impacted by many factors including, but not limited to,
general economic conditions; fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; fluctuations in the underlying values of real estate and other assets; the timing and ability to
collect and liquidate assets; increased competition from other market players in the industries in which we operate; and the availability, prices and terms for Portfolio Assets, middle-market
transactions and other investments in all of the Company's businesses. The Company's business and results of operations are also impacted by the availability of financing with terms acceptable to the
Company, and our access to capital markets. Such factors, individually or combined with other factors, may result in significant fluctuations in our reported operations and in the trading price of our
common stock.

Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008

Net earnings to common stockholders totaled $18.7 million in 2009 compared to net losses of $46.7 million in 2008. On a
per share basis, diluted net earnings to common stockholders were $1.83 in 2009 compared to diluted net losses per common share of ($4.55) in 2008.

Portfolio
Asset Acquisition and Resolution Business Segment

The
operating contribution from the Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution segment resulted in $18.3 million of operating income in 2009 compared to
$21.8 million of operating losses in 2008. FirstCity was involved in acquiring $200.6 million of Portfolio Assets in 2009 with an approximate Face Value of $410.1 million,
compared to its involvement in acquiring $89.3 million of Portfolio Assets in 2008 with an approximate Face Value of $798.1 million. In 2009, FirstCity's investment share in Portfolio
Asset acquisitions was $147.7 millionwith $144.7 million of investment acquired through consolidated Portfolios and $3.0 million of investment acquired through
Acquisition Partnerships. In 2008, FirstCity's investment share in Portfolio Asset acquisitions was $72.3 millionwhich was comprised of $70.2 million of investment acquired
through consolidated Portfolios and $2.1 million of investment acquired through Acquisition Partnerships. In 2009, FirstCity invested an additional $33.9 million in the form of SBA loan
originations and advances, direct equity investments, and other loan investmentscompared to $33.0 million of such additional investments in 2008.

24

---



Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the results of operations for the Company's Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business segment for 2009 and 2008:

Year ended December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution:Revenues:Servicing fees

$
9,130

$
10,813Income from Portfolio Assets


53,835


20,779Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale, net


1,327


227Interest income from SBA loans


1,251


1,606Interest income from loans receivableaffiliates


2,053


1,271Interest income from loans receivableother


414


696Other income


3,750


3,010Total revenues


71,760


38,402Expenses:Interest and fees on notes payable


13,639


15,816Salaries and benefits


14,794


14,870Provision for loan and impairment losses


4,232


17,173Asset-level expenses


5,944


5,433Occupancy, data processing and other


7,395


6,499Total expenses


46,004


59,791Equity in net loss of unconsolidated subsidiaries


(1,204
)

(724
)Gain on business combinations


1,455


Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests


(5,173
)

386Operating contribution (loss) before direct taxes

$
20,834

$
(21,727
)Operating contribution (loss), net of direct taxes

$
18,260

$
(21,834
)


Servicing fee revenues.Servicing fee revenues decreased to $9.1 million in 2009 from $10.8 million in 2008. Servicing fees
from
domestic Acquisition Partnerships totaled $2.3 million in 2009 compared to $2.4 million in 2008, while servicing fees from Latin American Acquisition Partnerships totaled
$6.9 million in 2009 compared to $8.4 million in 2008. Servicing fees from domestic Acquisition Partnerships are generally based on a percentage of the collections received from
Portfolio Assets held by these unconsolidated partnerships; whereas servicing fees from Latin American Acquisition Partnerships are generally based on the cost of servicing plus a profit margin. The
slight decline in servicing fees from domestic Acquisition Partnerships for 2009 in comparison to 2008 is attributable to a modest decline in domestic Portfolio Asset collections to
$30.1 million from $33.6 million for the respective periods. The decline in servicing fees from Latin American Acquisition Partnerships for 2009 in comparison to 2008 is attributable
primarily to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations during the respective periods that the fees were recorded.

Income from Portfolio Assets.Income from Portfolio Assets increased significantly to $53.8 million in 2009 compared to
$20.8 million
in 2008. FirstCity's average investment in consolidated Portfolio Assets increased significantly to $202.3 million for 2009 from $127.1 million for 2008. The large increase in income
from Portfolio Assets is attributed primarily to an increase in consolidated collections to $177.6 million in 2009 compared to $62.9 million in 2008 (due to FirstCity's increased
holdings in consolidated Portfolio Assets); and additional interest accretion recorded by the Company

25

---



Table of Contents

in
2009 as a result of its increased investment level in loan Portfolio Assets. Refer to Note 4 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for a summary of income from Portfolio
Assets.

Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale.The Company recorded $1.3 million of gains on the sales of SBA loans in 2009 with a
$22.5 million net basis in the loans sold, compared to $0.2 million of gains recorded in 2008 with a $5.1 million net basis in the loans sold. Gains on SBA loan sales reflect the
Company's participation in the SBA guaranteed loan program. Under the SBA 7(a) program, the SBA guarantees up to 90 percent of the principal on a qualifying loan. The Company generally sells
the guaranteed portions of originated loans into the secondary market and retains the unguaranteed portion for investment. The increased activity in 2009 is attributable to the return of investor
demand for SBA
loans as a result of certain federal government programs and initiatives that were implemented during the past year.

Interest income from SBA loans.Interest income from SBA loans decreased slightly to $1.3 million in 2009 compared to
$1.6 million in
2008. Even though FirstCity's average investment in SBA loans increased to $20.2 million for 2009 from $16.4 million for 2008, the decline in interest income is attributable to a steady
decline in market interest rates over the past two years (the Company's SBA loans are priced at variable market interest rates).

Interest income from loans receivableaffiliates.Interest income from loans receivableaffiliates increased to
$2.1 million for 2009 compared to $1.3 million for 2008. The increased income is attributed to FirstCity's average investment in loans receivableaffiliates growing to
$13.9 million for 2009 from $8.5 million for 2008.

Interest income from loans receivableother.Interest income from loans receivableother decreased to $0.4 million for
2009 from $0.7 million for 2008. The decline in interest income in 2009 compared to 2008 is attributable to FirstCity's increased holdings in 2009 of such loans accounted for under the cost
recovery method of accounting (i.e. non-accrual method). FirstCity's average investment in loans receivableother was $6.7 million in 2009, including
$3.1 million of such loans accounted for under the cost recovery method. FirstCity's average investment in loans receivableother was $5.6 million in 2008.

Other income.Other income for 2009 increased by $0.7 million in comparison to 2008 primarily due to $0.3 million of
additional
interest income recorded in 2009 on the Company's investment security (purchased in October 2008), and $0.6 million of additional due diligence income recorded in 2009 compared to 2008
(attributable to increased bidding and investment activity in 2009 compared to 2008).

Expenses.Operating expenses approximated $46.0 million in 2009 compared to $59.8 million in 2008. The following is a
discussion of the
major components of operating expenses:

Interest
and fees on notes payable totaled $13.6 million and $15.8 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. FirstCity's average outstanding debt increased to
$284.6 million for 2009 from $201.9 million for 2008primarily to finance its increased investment activity and to provide working capital to support future growth. However,
the Company's average cost of borrowings decreased to 4.8% in 2009 compared to 7.8% in 2008 due to a decline in market interest rates.

Salaries
and benefits remained relatively constant at $14.8 million in 2009 compared to $14.9 million in 2008. The total number of personnel within the Portfolio Asset
Acquisition and Resolution business segment was 210 and 214 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Net
provisions for loan and impairment losses on our consolidated Portfolio Assets and loans receivable totaled $4.2 million in 2009 (including $3.0 million of net
impairment provisions in the fourth quarter of 2009) compared to $17.2 million in 2008. The significant provisions recorded in 2008

26

---



Table of Contents

derived
from the then-developing adverse effects of the global economic crisis, resulting in net impairment provisions of $14.1 million recorded to the Company's consolidated
domestic loans; and $3.0 million of provisions recorded to domestic real estate properties. The $4.2 million of net impairment provisions in 2009 were attributed primarily to declines in
values of loan collateral and real estate assets in our domestic loans and Portfolios, which were comprised of $2.3 million recorded to our consolidated loans; and $1.9 million recorded
to real estate properties. The global distribution of the $4.2 million of net impairment provisions in 2009 includes $7.3 million in the United States; $0.1 million in Latin
America; and $3.2 million of net provision reversals in Europe. The impairment provisions were identified in connection with management's quarterly evaluation of the collectability of the
Company's Portfolio Assets and loans receivable. The process for evaluating and measuring impairment is critical to our financial results, as it requires subjective and complex judgments due to the
need to make estimates about the impact of matters that are uncertain. This process also requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. It
remains unclear what impact the illiquid markets, real estate value declines and the overall economic slowdown will ultimately have on our financial results. Therefore, we cannot provide assurance
that, in any particular period, we will not incur additional impairment provisions in the future.

Asset-level
expenses, which generally represent costs incurred by FirstCity to manage consolidated Portfolio Assets, support foreclosed properties and to protect its security interests
in loan collateral, increased to $5.9 million in 2009 from $5.4 million in 2008. The increase is attributed primarily to the Company's increased holdings in consolidated Portfolio Assets
(the Company's average investment in consolidated Portfolio Assets totaled $202.3 million for 2009 compared to $127.1 million for 2008).

Occupancy,
data processing and other expenses increased to $7.4 million for 2009 from $6.5 million in 2008. The increase is attributable primarily to additional amounts of
foreign currency exchange losses and third-party sub-servicing costs incurred on certain of our consolidated Portfolio Assets in 2009 compared to 2008.

Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries.Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries (Acquisition Partnership and
servicing
entities) increased to $1.2 million in losses for 2009 compared to $0.7 million in losses for 2008. Equity in losses of unconsolidated Acquisition Partnerships decreased to
$0.2 million in losses for 2009 from $1.0 million in earnings for 2008, and equity in losses of unconsolidated servicing entities decreased to $1.0 million in losses for 2009
compared to $1.7 million in losses for 2008. The following is a discussion of equity in earnings (loss) from FirstCity's Acquisition Partnerships by geographic region. Refer to Note 6 of
the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for a summary of revenues, earnings and equity in earnings (loss) of FirstCity's equity investments by region.





27

---



Table of Contents







28

---



Table of Contents



Gain on business combinations.In 2009, the Company recorded a $1.5 million gain attributable to a step acquisition transaction in
which the
Company acquired a controlling financial interest in certain French Acquisition Partnerships. The Company owned a noncontrolling equity interest in these entities prior to the transaction. Pursuant to
business combination accounting standards, the Company's previously-held noncontrolling interests in the French entities were remeasured to fair value on the acquisition date (May
2009)which resulted in the Company's recognition of the $1.5 million gain. Refer to Note 3 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional information
on this transaction.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.The amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased to
$5.2 million for 2009 from a net loss of $0.4 million for 2008. The increase is attributed primarily to a rise in net earnings from co-investments in portfolio purchases with
other investors through consolidated subsidiaries in 2009 compared to 2008. The Company's carrying value of noncontrolling interests on its consolidated balance sheets, which represents the equity in
consolidated subsidiaries not attributable to FirstCity, increased to $47.6 million at December 31, 2009 from $15.6 million at December 31, 2008.

Special
Situations Platform Business Segment

The
operating contribution from the Special Situations Platform business segment ("FirstCity Denver") totaled $1.8 million in 2009 compared to
$1.9 million in 2008. In 2009, FirstCity Denver was involved in domestic middle-market transactions with total investment values approximating $20.1 million. In connection with these
2009 investments, FirstCity Denver provided $12.4 million of investment capital to privately-held middle-market companiescomprised of $12.0 million in the form
of debt and $0.4 million as equity. In 2008, FirstCity Denver was involved in middle-market transactions with total investment values
approximating $28.8 million. In connection with these 2008 investments, FirstCity Denver provided $19.9 million of investment capital to privately-held middle-market
companiescomprised of $16.6 million in the form of debt and $3.3 million as equity.

29

---



Table of Contents

The
following is summary of the results of operations for the Company's Special Situations Platform business segment for 2009 and 2008:

Year ended December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Special Situations Platform:Revenues:Interest income from loans receivable

$
2,102

$
2,280Revenue from railroad operations


3,121


3,309Revenue from manufacturing operations, net


540


Other income


1,920


819Total revenues


7,683


6,408ExpensesRailroad Operations:Interest and fees on notes payable


150


154Salaries and benefits


1,019


1,031Other


1,088


1,245Total railroad expenses


2,257


2,430ExpensesManufacturing Operations:Salaries and benefits


195


Other


274


Total manufacturing expenses


469


ExpensesOther:Interest and fees on notes payable


464


275Salaries and benefits


1,032


853Provision for loan and impairment losses


1,034


581Other


1,917


1,082Total other expenses


4,447


2,791Total expenses


7,173


5,221Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries


940


952Gain on business combination


810


Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests


(386
)

(145
)Operating contribution before direct taxes

$
1,874

$
1,994Operating contribution, net of direct taxes

$
1,756

$
1,888


Interest income from loans receivable.Interest income from loans receivable decreased to $2.1 million in 2009 from
$2.3 million in
2008. The slight decline in interest income in 2009 compared to 2008 is attributable to FirstCity Denver's increased holdings in 2009 of such loans accounted for under the cost recovery method of
accounting (i.e. non-accrual method). FirstCity Denver's average investment in loans receivable was $20.0 million for 2009, including $2.5 million of such loans
accounted for under the cost recovery method. For 2008, FirstCity Denver's average investment in loans receivable was $15.1 million.

Revenue from railroad operations.Revenue from railroad operations represents revenue generated by FirstCity Denver's majority-owned
domestic
railroad company that was acquired in August 2007.

30

---



Table of Contents

Revenue
from railroad operations of $3.1 million for 2009 remained relatively constant in comparison to $3.3 million for 2008.

Revenue from manufacturing operations, net.Revenue from manufacturing operations in 2009 represents the net revenues generated by
FirstCity Denver's
majority-owned radio broadcast equipment manufacturing company that it acquired on December 11, 2009. This business's results of operations are recognized in FirstCity's consolidated results of
operations for the period December 11, 2009 (acquisition date) to December 31, 2009. Refer to Note 3 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional
information on this transaction.

Other income.Other income for 2009 increased by $1.1 million in comparison to 2008 primarily due to $1.2 million of gains
recognized
by FirstCity Denver's majority-owned railroad operation in 2009 in connection with a property and equipment sales.

ExpensesRailroad Operations.Total 2009 expenses attributable to FirstCity Denver's majority-owned railroad operations remained
relatively constant in comparison to 2008.

ExpensesOther.ExpensesOther in 2009 increased by $1.7 million in comparison to 2008 primarily due to
$0.5 million of additional net impairment provisions recorded in 2009 on a middle-market company debt investment. The impairment provision was identified in connection with management's regular
evaluation of the collectibility of the FirstCity Denver's loan investments. The process for evaluating and measuring impairment is critical to our financial results, as it requires subjective and
complex judgments due to the need to make estimates about the impact of matters that are uncertain; and estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
Other expenses for 2009 increased by $0.8 million in comparison to 2008 primarily due to additional operating expenses incurred in 2009 in connection with FirstCity Denver's consolidated
investments in a real estate property (acquired in June 2008) and a radio broadcast equipment manufacturing company (acquired in December 2009; see discussion above).

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries.Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries totaled $0.9 million
in 2009 and
$1.0 million in 2008which is comprised primarily of FirstCity Denver's equity earnings in its equity-method investments in a coal mine operation (for 2008 and 2009) and
ceramic-ware manufacturing entity (for 2009 only). In 2009, FirstCity Denver's equity in earnings attributable to the coal mine's operating income approximated $2.4 million;
however, FirstCity Denver's share of net earnings in the coal mine was offset partially by its share ($1.1 million) of a one-time charge incurred by the coal mine company in 2009 to
relinquish its future reclamation liability. FirstCity Denver's share of net earnings in the
ceramic-ware manufacturing entity was $0.2 million in 2009. Equity in net earnings for 2008 is attributable to FirstCity Denver's share of net earnings from its equity-method
investment in the coal mine operation.

Gain on business combinations.In December 2009, the Company acquired an 87.45% equity interest in a business involved in the radio
broadcast
equipment industry. The fair value of the acquired net assets of the business exceeded FirstCity Denver's purchase price by $0.8 millionwhich was recognized as a bargain purchase
gain under business combination accounting standards. Refer to Note 3 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional information on this transaction.

Other
Significant Items Affecting Operations

The
following items affect the Company's overall results of operations and are not directly allocated to the Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution or the
Special Situations Platform business segments discussed above.

31

---



Table of Contents

Income from lawsuit settlement.In December 2009, FirstCity recorded $6.1 million of other income in connection with the settlement
of a
lawsuit. Refer to Note 21 of our 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Corporate interest and overhead.Net corporate overhead expenses (excluding income tax expense) increased to $7.9 million in 2009
from
$6.7 million in 2008, primarily due to $1.1 million of additional salaries and benefits expense in 2009 compared to 2008.

Income taxes.Provision for income taxes was $2.2 million in 2009 compared to $20.2 million in 2008. Income tax expense in
2009
included $1.9 million of foreign income tax expense from the Company's investments and operations in Europe (attributable primarily to an increase in consolidated income in 2009 compared to
2008 from consolidated European entities as a result of the Company's equity acquisitions in such entitiessee Note 3 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements).
Income tax expense in 2008 includes a $20.1 million deferred tax expense recorded in connection with a full valuation allowance established by the Company for its deferred tax asset. The
valuation allowance was established due to the lack of objectively verifiable evidence regarding the
realization of our deferred tax asset in the foreseeable future. Refer to Note 13 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial statements for additional information on income taxes.

Portfolio Asset AcquisitionsPortfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution Business Segment

Revenues with respect to the Company's Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business segment consist primarily of
(i) income from Portfolio Assets and loans receivable; (ii) gains on the disposition and settlement of Portfolio Assets and other assets; and (iii) servicing fees from Acquisition
Partnerships for the performance of servicing activities related to the assets held in the Acquisition Partnerships. The Company also records equity in earnings of non-consolidated
Acquisition Partnerships and servicing entities accounted for under the equity-method of accounting.

In
2009, the Company invested $147.7 million in consolidated and unconsolidated Portfolio Assets acquired through Acquisition Partnerships and subsidiaries. Portfolio Asset
acquisitions by the Company over the last five years are summarized as follows:

Purchase
Price

FirstCity
Investment(Dollars in thousands)1st Quarter

$
70,238

$
64,9072nd Quarter


67,085


48,5593rd Quarter


48,659


21,0004th Quarter


14,608


13,188Total 2009


200,590


147,654Total 2008


89,314


72,307Total 2007


214,333


126,714Total 2006


296,990


144,048Total 2005


146,581


71,405


Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, the Company was involved in acquiring $14.1 million of Portfolio Assets with a Face Value of approximately
$22.3 millionof which FirstCity's investment share was $12.6 million.

The
table below provides a summary of our loan Portfolio Assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans are categorized based on the
common risk

32

---



Table of Contents

characteristics
that management generally uses for pooling purposes (when management elects to pool groups of purchased loans).

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Loan and Loan Pool TypePurchased Credit-Impaired LoansDomestic:Commercial real estate

$
138,485

$
87,701Business assets


26,983


19,689Other


3,906


1,078Latin America


10,545


11,141Europe


13,001


5,499UBN loan portfolio:Non-performing loans


60,929


62,208Performing loans


1,555


1,705Other


8,367


8,481Outstanding balance


263,771


197,502Allowance for loan losses


(65,825
)

(76,365
)Carrying amount, net

$
197,946

$
121,137


The
following table provides a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses related to our loan Portfolio Assets:

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

OtherDomestic(dollars in thousands)

Commercial
Real Estate

Business
Assets

Other

Latin
America

Europe

UBN

Other

TotalBeginning Balance, January 1, 2009

$
10,440

$
2,811

$
538

$
120

$


$
62,150

$
306

$
76,365Provisions


4,191


902


191


113


127





97


5,621Recoveries


(152
)

(236
)

(5
)







(3,367
)

(16
)

(3,776
)Charge offs


(8,565
)

(3,083
)

(334
)

(138
)




(3,587
)

(112
)

(15,819
)Translation adjustments











5


1


3,428





3,434Ending Balance, December 31, 2009

$
5,914

$
394

$
390

$
100

$
128

$
58,624

$
275

$
65,825


Due
to uncertainties related primarily to estimating the timing and/or amount of collections on Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans as a result of the current economic environment, the
Company's levels of such loans and loan pools accounted for on a non-accrual method of accounting (cost-recovery or cash basis) increased to $138.4 million at
December 31, 2009 from $28.9 million at December 31, 2008. Under U.S. GAAP, the interest method (i.e. accrual method) of accounting is not appropriate if management
does not have the ability to develop a reasonable expectation of both the timing and amount of future cash flows to be collected. Refer to Note 1 of the Company's 2009 consolidated financial
statements for additional information and accounting policies related to our Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans. The

33

---



Table of Contents

following
tables provide a summary of the Company's Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans by income-recognition method as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):

December 31, 2009Income-Accruing Loans

Non-Accrual LoansPurchased Credit-Impaired LoansOtherPurchased
Credit-
Impaired
LoansOther

Cash basis

Cost recovery
basis

Cash basis

Cost recovery
basis

Real Estate

TotalUnited States

$
42,385

$
5,323

$
42,125

$
78,165

$
2,770

$


$
26,438

$
197,206France





1,555





7,648





2,305





11,508Germany


5,225




















5,225Mexico











10,445











10,445Total

$
47,610

$
6,878

$
42,125

$
96,258

$
2,770

$
2,305

$
26,438

$
224,384




December 31, 2008Income-Accruing Loans

Non-Accrual LoansPurchased Credit-Impaired LoansOtherPurchased
Credit-
Impaired
LoansOther

Cash basis

Cost recovery
basis

Cash basis

Cost recovery
basis

Real Estate

TotalUnited States

$
76,795

$
4,839

$


$
17,884

$
3,336

$


$
27,076

$
129,930France





1,705











58





1,763Germany


5,499




















5,499Mexico











11,021











11,021Total

$
82,294

$
6,544

$


$
28,905

$
3,336

$
58

$
27,076

$
148,213


Middle-Market Company Capital InvestmentsSpecial Situations Platform Business Segment

Revenues with respect to the Company's Special Situations Platform business segment consist primarily of (i) interest and fee
income from loan investments; (ii) revenues from majority-owned operating entities; and (iii) equity in earnings of non-consolidated investments accounted for under the
equity-method of accounting.

In
2009, FirstCity Denver was involved in middle-market capital transactions with total investment values approximating $20.1 million. Investments by FirstCity Denver since its
inception in April 2007 are summarized below:

First City Denver's InvestmentTotal
Investment(Dollars in thousands)

Debt

Equity

TotalTotal 2009

$
20,058

$
12,023

$
392

$
12,415Total 2008


28,750


16,650


3,256


19,906Total 2007


22,314


5,630


5,900


11,530


Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, FirstCity Denver has invested $4.6 million in the form of a debt investment to a domestic middle-market privately-held
business.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company requires liquidity to fund its operations, Portfolio Asset acquisitions, investments in and advances to entities formed to
acquire Portfolios ("Acquisition Partnerships"), capital investments

34

---



Table of Contents

in
privately-held middle-market companies, other investments, repayments of bank borrowings and other debt, and working capital to support our growth. Historically, our primary sources of
liquidity have been funds generated from operations (primarily loan collections and service fees), equity distributions from the Acquisition Partnerships and other subsidiaries, interest and principal
payments on subordinated intercompany debt, dividends from the Company's subsidiaries, borrowings from credit facilities with external lenders, and other special-purpose short-term
borrowings.

Cash
generated from our operations and investments is dependent primarily upon our ability to collect on our consolidated Portfolio Assets (and Portfolio Assets in our Acquisition
Partnerships) and loan investments. Many factors, including general economic conditions, are essential to our ability to generate cash flows. Fluctuations in our collections, investment income, credit
availability, and adverse changes in other factors, could have a negative impact on our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to support our business. Despite recent credit market conditions, we
have continued to have access to liquidity in both our Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution and Special Situations Platform business segments through our credit facility commitments with our
external lenders.

We
believe that funds generated from collections from consolidated loan and real estate portfolios, loans receivable and other investments; fees generated from servicing assets; equity
distributions from existing Acquisition Partnerships and other equity investments; and sales of guaranteed portions of existing and originated SBA loanstogether with existing cash and
available borrowings under our existing credit agreementswill be sufficient to finance our current operations and support our growth during the next 12 months.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FirstCity entered into amendments to its existing loan facilities with Bank of Scotland and BoS(USA) (collectively, "Bank of Scotland") that
extended the maturity dates of the debt outstanding under these loan agreements to April 1, 2011. The credit amendments did not change the other primary terms and covenants of these loan
facilities.

FirstCity
is very cognizant of the current terms of its primary credit facilities, as amended, with Bank of Scotland and the distressed condition of the U.S. financial markets
that currently presents challenges for businesses in accessing liquidity. As such, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland continue negotiations relating
to a long-term restructuring agreement that would, among other things, extend the maturity date of this debt beyond April 1, 2011. The Company is in the process of negotiating a
3-year term loan that allows for repayment to Bank of Scotland over time as cash flows from the underlying assets securing the loan facilities are realized. It is anticipated that the term
loan would allow the Company to use its current liquidity and certain levels of cash flow to fund its overhead expenses and future investments. FirstCity will continue to actively pursue alternative
funding sources with other parties to provide equity and/or debt financing to support the Company's future investment activities. There can be no assurances that FirstCity will close on a
long-term restructuring agreement with Bank of Scotland for its loan facilities on terms that are acceptable to the Company, or that FirstCity will be able to obtain alternative sources of
funding on acceptable terms, if at all.



Our operating activities provided cash of $2.8 million and used cash of $21.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net cash provided by operations in 2009 was attributable primarily to $24.3 million of net earnings; $23.8 million of proceeds from sales
of SBA loans held for sale; $16.8 million of proceeds applied to income from Portfolio Assets; $7.4 million increase in other liabilities; and $9.4 million of non-cash
add-backs related to depreciation, amortization, and provisions for loan and impairment lossesoffset partially by $17.8 million of net principal advances on SBA loans
held for sale; $53.8 million of income accretion and gains on Portfolio Assets; and $4.5 million of gains attributable to SBA loan sales, property sales and business combination
transactions. In 2008, net cash used in operations was attributable primarily to a net loss

35

---



Table of Contents

of
$46.9 million; $20.8 million of income accretion and gains on Portfolio Assets; and $9.6 million of net principal advances on SBA loans held for saleoffset
partially by $5.3 million of proceeds from sales of SBA loans held for sale; $14.0 million of proceeds applied to income from Portfolio Assets; and $41.5 million of
non-cash add-backs related to provisions for loan and impairment losses ($17.8 million), deferred income tax expense ($20.1 million), an depreciation and
amortization ($3.6 million). The remaining changes in the periods were due primarily to net changes in other accounts related to our operating activities.

Our
investing activities used cash of $21.9 million in 2009 and $47.9 million in 2008. Net cash used in 2009 for investing activities was attributable primarily to
Portfolio Asset purchases of $25.6 million (net of principal collections); $8.6 million paid for business combinations; $2.6 million of property and equipment purchases; and
$5.7 million of contributions to unconsolidated subsidiariesoffset partially by $1.9 million of net principal collections on loan investments; $12.9 million of
distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries; $4.5 million of principal payments on an investment security; and $1.4 million of proceeds from sales of property. Net cash used in 2008
for investing activities was attributable primarily to Portfolio Asset purchases of $29.5 million (net of principal collections); $29.8 million of net principal advances on loan
investments; $3.1 million of
contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries; $6.5 million disbursed to purchase an investment security; and $1.6 million of property and equipment purchasesoffset partially
by $21.6 million of distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries and $1.3 million of principal payments on an investment security. The remaining changes in all periods were due
primarily to net changes in other accounts related to our investing activities.

Our
financing activities provided cash of $80.1 million in 2009 and $68.5 million in 2008. In 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was attributable primarily to
$59.3 million of net borrowings to finance our Portfolio Asset acquisitions and other investments and to provide working capital to support future growth; and $42.6 million of
contributions from noncontrolling interests primarily to acquire Portfolio Assets through consolidated subsidiariesoffset partially by $19.3 million of cash distributions to
noncontrolling interests and $2.8 million of cash paid to acquire additional equity in noncontrolling interests. In 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was attributable primarily to
$69.7 million of net borrowings to finance our Portfolio Asset acquisitions and other investments; and $4.8 million of contributions from noncontrolling interests primarily to acquire
Portfolio Assets through consolidated subsidiariesoffset partially by $4.9 million of common stock repurchases and $1.1 million of cash distributions to noncontrolling
interests. The remaining changes in all periods were due primarily to net changes in other accounts related to our financing activities.

Cash
paid for interest expense approximated $9.8 million and $12.9 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Substantially all of our interest expense was paid on our credit
facilities and other borrowings. FirstCity's average outstanding debt increased to $295.6 million for 2009 from $208.8 million for 2008, while the average cost of borrowings decreased to
4.8% in 2009 compared to 7.8% in 2008. The increase in the Company's debt level since 2008 is a result of increased net borrowings to finance the Company's investment transactions and to provide
working capital to accommodate its future growth and investment activities.



The following is an analysis of the cash flows related to FirstCity's majority-owned railroad operation for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

36

---



Table of Contents

The operating activities of the railroad subsidiary provided cash of $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009attributable
primarily to $1.9 million of net earnings and a $1.7 million increase in other liabilities; offset partially by $1.2 million of gains on sales of property and equipment. The
railroad subsidiary's investing activities used cash of $0.8 million for 2009. Net cash used by investing activities included $2.0 million of property and equipment purchases; offset by
$1.6 million of proceeds from property and equipment sales. The railroad subsidiary's financing activities used cash of $1.6 million for 2009attributable primarily to
providing $1.6 million of capital distributions to the equity owners and FirstCity (parent company) through principal repayments on a capital note (eliminated in consolidation).

The
railroad subsidiary's operating activities provided cash of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008attributable primarily to $0.7 million
of net earnings and a $0.2 million increase in other liabilities. The railroad subsidiary's investing activities used cash of $0.8 million for 2008 to purchase property and equipment. In
2008, the railroad subsidiary's financing activities included $3.5 million of net borrowings under a bank note payable; offset by $3.9 million of capital distributions to the equity
owners and FirstCity (parent company) through principal repayments on a capital note (eliminated in consolidation).



The following is a summary of FirstCity's primary external lending facilities that it uses to provide liquidity for equity and loan
investments, Portfolio Asset acquisitions, Acquisition Partnership investments, capital investments, and working capital:



FirstCity has a $225.0 million revolving acquisition facility with Bank of Scotland plc ("Bank of Scotland") that matures
on April 1, 2011 (as amended). The revolving loan facility is used to finance the senior debt and equity portion of Portfolio Asset purchases made by FirstCity and to provide for the issuance
of letters of credit and working capital loans. The obligations of FirstCity under this facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of FirstCity and its consolidated subsidiaries and
guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's consolidated subsidiaries. The primary terms and key covenants of this revolving credit facility, as amended, are as follows:



37

---



Table of Contents



At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with Bank of Scotland.

FirstCity
has $24.8 million in Euro-denominated debt on the $225.0 million revolving loan facility with Bank of Scotland described above for the purpose of
hedging a portion of the net equity investments in Europe. In general, the type of risk hedged relates to the foreign currency exposure of net investments in Europe caused by movements in Euro
exchange rates. The Company entered into the hedging relationship such that changes in the net investments being hedged are expected to be offset by corresponding changes in the values of the
Euro-denominated debt. Effectiveness of the hedging relationship is measured and designated at the beginning of each month by comparing the outstanding balance of the
Euro-denominated debt to the carrying value of the designated net equity investments. Net foreign currency translation gains included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
relating to the Euro-denominated debt was $4,000 for 2009 and $2.6 million for 2008.

On
March 30, 2009, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $225.0 million revolving loan facility to amend the definitions of "indebtedness" and
"tangible net worth" such that in the determination of "tangible net worth" and the computation of the ratio of "indebtedness to tangible net worth" for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2008 and thereafter, "tangible net worth" and "indebtedness" would be adjusted by deducting non-controlling interests in subsidiaries from liabilities and adding
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to equity (as provided by FASB's accounting and reporting guidance on non-controlling interests issued in December 2007) for fiscal
quarters ending after December 31, 2008. These amended definitions are included in the primary terms and key covenants outlined above.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $225.0 million revolving loan facility to extend the maturity date to
April 1, 2011. See the discussion above for additional information on this amendment.



FH Partners LLC ("FH Partners"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, has a $100.0 million revolving loan facility
with Bank of Scotland that provides financing for Portfolio Asset purchases by FH Partners. This revolving loan facility matures on April 1, 2011 (as amended), and is secured by all assets of
FH Partners and a guaranty by FirstCity and certain of its consolidated subsidiaries. The primary terms and key covenants of this $100.0 million revolving loan facility, as amended, are as
follows:



38

---



Table of Contents



At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with Bank of Scotland.

On
March 30, 2009, FH Partners and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $100.0 million revolving loan facility to amend the definitions of "indebtedness" and
"tangible net worth" such that in the determination of "tangible net worth" and the computation of the ratio of "indebtedness to tangible net worth" for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2008 and thereafter, "tangible net worth" and "indebtedness" would be adjusted by deducting non-controlling interests in subsidiaries from liabilities and adding
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to equity (as provided by FASB's accounting and reporting guidance on non-controlling interests issued in December 2007) for fiscal
quarters ending after December 31, 2008.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FH Partners and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $100.0 million revolving loan facility to extend the maturity date to
April 1, 2011. See the discussion above for additional information on this amendment.



FirstCity has a $25.0 million subordinated credit agreement with BoS(USA), a subsidiary of Bank of Scotland, which may be used
to finance equity investments in new
ventures, equity investments made in connection with Portfolio Asset purchases and loans made by FirstCity and its subsidiaries to acquisition entities, provide for the issuance of letters of credit,
and for working capital loans. This credit facility matures on April 1, 2011 (as amended), and is secured by substantially all of the assets of FirstCity and its consolidated subsidiaries and
guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's consolidated subsidiaries. The primary terms and key covenants of this $25.0 million loan facility, as amended, are as
follows:



39

---



Table of Contents



At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with BoS(USA).

In
connection with a previous financing arrangement, FirstCity issued a warrant to BoS(USA) to purchase 425,000 shares of the Company's voting common stock at $2.3125 per share. This
warrant also entitled BoS(USA) with additional warrants under certain specific situations to retain its ability to own approximately 4.86% of the Company's voting common stock. The warrant expired on
December 31, 2009 without being exercised.

On
March 30, 2009, FirstCity and BoS(USA) entered into an amendment to this $25.0 million subordinated credit agreement to amend the definitions of "indebtedness" and
"tangible net worth" such that in the determination of "tangible net worth" and the computation of the ratio of "indebtedness to tangible net worth" for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2008 and thereafter, "tangible net worth" and "indebtedness" would be adjusted by deducting non-controlling interests in subsidiaries from liabilities and adding
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to equity (as provided by FASB's accounting and reporting guidance on non-controlling interests issued in December 2007) for fiscal
quarters ending after December 31, 2008. These amended definitions are included in the primary terms and key covenants outlined above.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $25.0 million loan facility to extend the maturity date to April 1,
2011. See the discussion above for additional information on this amendment.



FirstCity Mexico SA de CV, a wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary of FirstCity, has a term note with Banco Santander, S.A.
with an unpaid principal balance of 142,240,000 Mexican pesos at December 31, 2009, which was equivalent to $11.0 million U.S. dollars on that date. The loan proceeds are used to pay
down the acquisition facility with the Bank of Scotland. Pursuant to the terms of the credit facility,

40

---



Table of Contents

FirstCity
Mexico SA de CV was required to provide a stand-by letter of credit from Bank of Scotland that would satisfy the loan balance upon demand. At December 31, 2009,
FirstCity had a letter of credit in the amount of $12.6 million from Bank of Scotland under the terms of FirstCity's revolving acquisition facility with Bank of Scotland. In the event that a
demand is made under the $12.6 million letter of credit, FirstCity is required to reimburse Bank of Scotland by making payment to Bank of Scotland for all amounts disbursed or to be disbursed
by Bank of Scotland under the letter of credit.



At December 31, 2009, American Business Lending, Inc. ("ABL"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, had
a $25.0 million revolving loan facility with Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, LLC ("WFCF"), for the purpose of financing and acquiring SBA loans. This credit facility matures in January 2012 and is secured by substantially all of ABL's assets. In
connection with this loan facility, FirstCity provides WFCF with an unconditional guaranty for all of ABL's obligations up to maximum of $5.0 million plus enforcement costs. The
primary terms and key covenants of the $25.0 million revolving loan facility, as amended, are as follows.



At
December 31, 2009, ABL was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with WFCF, except for the covenant
related to delinquent and defaulted loans. At the end of each month, ABL's ratio of delinquent and defaulted non-guaranteed loans should not exceed 8.0%
(ABL's measure under this condition was 9.5% at December 31, 2009). WFCF waived this covenant requirement of the agreement as of December 31, 2009.

41

---



Table of Contents

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of
operations and financial position in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company believes that the following discussion addresses the Company's most critical accounting policies, which are
those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company's consolidated financial position and results and require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result
of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.



A
substantial majority of the Company's Portfolio Assets include loans and loan portfolios with evidence of credit deterioration that were acquired after 2004
("Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans"). FirstCity accounts for these loans under FASB's accounting guidance (issued in December 2003) related to Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans. This guidance addresses
accounting differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor's initial investment in acquired loans if those differences are attributable, at least in
part, to credit
quality. The guidance also requires acquired loans with credit deterioration to be initially recorded at fair value and prohibits "carrying over" or the creation of valuation allowances in the initial
accounting of acquired loans that are within its scope. The excess cash flows expected at acquisition over the loan portfolio's purchase price is recorded as interest income over the life of the
portfolio.

The
amounts paid for Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans reflect the Company's determination that the loans have experienced deterioration in credit quality since origination and that it is
probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the underlying loans. At acquisition, the Company reviews the individual loans to determine whether
there is evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan's contractual terms. If
both conditions exist, the Company determines whether each such loan is to be accounted for individually or whether such loans will be assembled into static pools based on common risk characteristics
(primarily loan type and collateral). Static pools of individual loan accounts may be established and accounted for as a single economic unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss
provision. Once a static loan pool is established, individual accounts are generally not added to or removed from the pool (unless the Company sells, forecloses or writes-off the loan). At
acquisition, the Company determines the excess of the scheduled contractual payments over all cash flows expected to be collected for the loan or loan pool as an amount that should not be accreted
("nonaccretable difference"). The excess of the cash flows from the loan or loan pool expected to be collected at acquisition over the initial investment ("accretable difference") is recognized as
interest income over the remaining life of the loan or loan pool on a level-yield basis ("accretable yield"). The discount (i.e. the difference between the cost of each loan or static pool and
the related aggregate contractual receivable balance) is not recorded because the Company does not expect to fully collect each contractual receivable balance for the loan or loan pool. As a result,
these loans and loan pools are recorded at cost (which approximates fair value) at the time of acquisition.

The
Company accounts for Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans using either the interest method or a non-accrual method (through application of the cost-recovery or
cash basis method of accounting). Application of the interest method is dependent on management's ability to develop a reasonable expectation as to both the timing and amount of cash flows expected to
be collected. In the event the Company cannot develop or establish a reasonable expectation as to both the timing and amount of

42

---



Table of Contents

cash
flows expected to be collected, the Company uses the cost-recovery or cash basis method of accounting.

Interest method of accounting.Under the interest method, an effective interest rate, or IRR, is applied to the cost basis of the loan
or loan pool.
The excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows cannot be recognized as an adjustment of income or expense or on the balance sheet. The IRR that is calculated when the loan is
purchased remains constant as the basis for subsequent impairment testing (performed at least quarterly) and income recognition. Significant increases in actual, or
expected future cash flows, are used first to reverse any existing valuation allowance for that loan or loan pool; and any remaining increase may be recognized prospectively through an upward
adjustment of the IRR over the remaining life of the loan or loan pool. Any increase to the IRR then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing and income recognition. Subsequent decreases in
projected cash flows do not change the IRR, but are recognized as an impairment of the cost basis of the loan or loan pool (to maintain the then-current IRR), and are reflected in the
consolidated statements of operations through provisions charged to operations, with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting the loan or loan pool in the consolidated balance sheets. FirstCity
establishes valuation allowances for loans and loan pools acquired with credit deterioration to reflect only those losses incurred after acquisitionthat is, the cash flows expected at
acquisition that are no longer expected to be collected. Income from loans and loan pools accounted for under the interest method is accrued based on the IRR of each loan or loan pool applied to their
respective adjusted cost basis. Gross collections in excess of the interest accrual and impairments will reduce the carrying value of the loan or loan pool, while gross collections less than the
interest accrual will increase the carrying value. The IRR is calculated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using the Company's proprietary collection models.

Cost-recovery method of accounting.If the amount and timing of future cash collections on a loan are not reasonably estimable, the
Company accounts for such asset on the cost-recovery method. Under the cost-recovery method, no income is recognized until the Company has fully collected the cost of the loan,
or until such time as the Company considers the timing and amount of collections to be reasonably estimable and begins to recognize income based on the interest method as described above. At least
quarterly, the Company performs an evaluation to determine if the remaining amount that is probable of collection is less than the carrying value of the loan or loan pool, and if so, recognizes
impairment through provisions charged to operations. The cost-recovery accounting model is permitted by FASB's accounting guidance applicable to Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans.

Cash basis method of accounting.If only the amount of future cash collections on a loan is reasonably estimable, the Company accounts
for such asset
on an individual loan basis under the cash basis method of accounting. Under the cash basis method, no income is recognized unless collections are received during the period, or until such time as the
Company considers the timing of collections to be reasonably estimable and begins to recognize income based on the interest method as described above. Income is recognized for the difference between
the collections and a pro-rata portion of cost on a loan. Cost allocation is based on a proration of actual collections divided by total projected collections on the loan. Significant
increases in future cash flows may be recognized prospectively as income over the remaining life of the loan through increased amounts allocated to income when collections are subsequently received.
Subsequent decreases in projected cash flows will be recognized as impairment of the loan's cost basis to maintain a constant cost allocation based on initial projections. The cash basis method
accounting model is permitted by FASB's accounting guidance applicable to Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans.

43

---





Table of Contents



Loans
receivableSBA held for sale represent the portion of U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") loans acquired and originated by the Company
that are guaranteed by the SBA. These loans are recorded at the lower of aggregate cost or estimated fair value. The fair value of SBA loans held for sale is based primarily on what secondary markets
are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance through a charge to income. The carrying value of SBA loans
held for sale is net of premiums as well as deferred origination fees and costs. Premiums and net origination fees and costs are deferred and included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains
and losses upon sale. SBA loans are generally secured by the borrowing entities' assets such as accounts receivable, property and equipment, and other business assets. The Company generally sells the
guaranteed portion of each loan to a third party and retains the servicing rights. The difference between the proceeds received and the allocated carrying value of the loans sold are recognized as net
gains on sales of loans. The non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans is generally classified as held for investment.

Loans
receivable consisting of loans made to affiliated entities (including Acquisition Partnerships and other equity-method investees) and non-affiliated entities, and the
non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans, are classified by management as held for
investment. These loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and
unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Loan origination fees and costs, as well as purchase premiums and discounts, are amortized as level-yield adjustments over the respective loan
terms. Unamortized net fees, costs, premiums or discounts are recognized upon early repayment or sale of the loan. Repayment of the loans is generally dependent upon future cash flows of the
borrowers, future cash flows of the underlying collateral, and distributions made from affiliated entities. Interest is accrued when earned in accordance with the contractual terms of the loans.
Interest is recognized on an accrual basis at the applicable interest rate on the principal amount outstanding.

The
Company evaluates the need for impairment on loans receivable on an individual-loan basis at least quarterly by reviewing the collectibility of the loans in light of
various factors, as applicable, such as estimated future cash receipts of the borrower or underlying collateral, historical experience, estimated value of underlying collateral, prevailing economic
conditions, and industry concentrations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. We
consider a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, we determine it is probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan's contractual terms
(including scheduled interest payments). When management identifies a loan as impaired, we measure the impairment based on discounted future cash flows, except when the source of repayment is the
operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, we use the current fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. When a loan is determined
to be impaired, the Company generally ceases to accrue interest on the note and unpaid interest is reversed against interest income to the extent deemed by management to be uncollectible. When
ultimate collectibility of the impaired note is in doubt, all collections are generally applied to reduce the principal amount of such notes until the principal has been recovered, and collections
thereafter are recognized as interest income. Impairment losses are charged against an allowance account through provisions charged to operations in the period impairment is identified. Loans are
written-off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.



The
Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing

44

---



Table of Contents

assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on
the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically by
the Company based on the more-likely-than-not realization threshold criterion. In
the assessment, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other factors, the
nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, excess of appreciated asset value over the tax basis of net assets, the duration of statutory
carryforward periods, the Company's experience with utilizing available operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and tax planning strategies. This process involves significant management judgment
about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws between our projected operating performance, our actual results and other factors.

For
purposes of evaluating the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. At December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Company established a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets due to the lack of sufficient objective evidence regarding the realization of these assets in the foreseeable
future. Regardless of the deferred tax valuation allowance established at December 31, 2009, the Company continues to retain net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of
approximately $124.3 million available to offset future federal taxable income, if any, through the year 2027 (includes $68.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards that expire in
2010). To the extent that the Company generates taxable income in the future to utilize the tax benefits of the related deferred tax assets, subject to certain potential limitations, it may be able to
reduce its effective tax rate by reducing the valuation allowance.

We
believe that the accounting estimate for the valuation of deferred tax assets is a critical accounting estimate because judgment is required in assessing the likely future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. We base our estimate of deferred tax assets and liabilities on current tax laws and rates and, in certain
cases, business plans and other expectations about future outcomes. Changes in existing tax laws or rates could affect actual tax results and future business results, including further market
deterioration, may affect the amount of deferred tax liabilities or the valuation of deferred tax assets over time. Changes that are not anticipated in our current estimates could have a material
period-to-period impact on our financial position or results of operations.



The
Company uses estimates to determine future cash receipts from Portfolio Assets. These estimates of future cash receipts from Portfolio Assets are utilized
in four primary ways:



The
Company uses proprietary programs and collection models to manage the Portfolio Assets it owns and services. Each asset within a pool is analyzed by an account manager who is
responsible for analyzing the characteristics of each asset within a pool. The account manager projects future cash receipts and expenses related to each asset, the sum of which provides the total
estimated future cash

45

---



Table of Contents

receipts
related to a particular purchased asset pool. These estimates are routinely monitored by the Company to determine reasonableness of the estimates provided.



The
Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FirstCity, its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, and certain variable
interest entities. If we determine that we have a controlling financial interest in an entity, then we must consolidate the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the entity in our
consolidated financial statements. A controlling financial interest typically arises as a result of ownership of a majority of the voting interests of an entity. We may also have a controlling
financial interest in an entity through an arrangement that does not involve voting interests, such as a variable interest entity ("VIE"). In general, a VIE is an entity that has one or more of the
following characteristics (1) the entity has total equity at risk that is not sufficient to finance its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support from other
entities; (2) the group of equity owners does not have the ability to make significant decisions about the entity's activities; (3) the group of equity owners does not have the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive residual returns generated by its operations, or both; or (4) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations
to absorb the losses or the right to receive residual returns of the entity, or both, and substantially all of the entity's activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has
disproportionately few voting rights. If any of these characteristics is present, the entity is subject to a variable interests consolidation analysis, and
consolidation is based on variable interests, and not solely on ownership of the entity's outstanding voting stock. Variable interests are generally defined as contractual, ownership or other economic
interests in an entity that change with fluctuations in the entity's net asset value. The Company consolidates any VIE of which it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the enterprise
that absorbs a majority of expected losses or receives a majority of residual returns (if the losses or returns occur), or both. We are required to evaluate whether to consolidate a VIE when we first
become involved and upon subsequent reconsideration events (e.g., a purchase of additional equity interests). Generally, if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, then we initially record the
assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements at fair value.

The
Company does not consolidate equity investments in 20%- to 50%-owned entities that are not VIEs where the Company does not have an effective controlling interest, or equity
investments in 20%-to 50%-owned entities that are VIEs where the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Rather, such investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting since the
Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investees' operating and financial policies. The Company also accounts for its unconsolidated equity investments in less than
20%-owned entities under the equity method of accounting. FirstCity has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these entities, despite its
comparatively smaller ownership percentage, due primarily to its active participation in the policy-making process as well as its involvement in the daily management activities. These entities are
formed generally to share in the risks and rewards in developing new markets as well as to pool resources. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company's investment in these unconsolidated
entities is carried at the cost of acquisition, plus the Company's share of equity in undistributed earnings or losses since acquisition.

Effects of Newly Adopted Accounting Standards



In
December 2007, the FASB issued accounting and reporting guidance on business combinations in consolidated financial statements. The guidance on business
combinations establishes principal requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any non-controlling interest in the acquiree.

46

---



Table of Contents

This
guidance also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination, recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies,
and determining what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial impact of the business combination. We adopted this new guidance on
January 1, 2009 and prospectively applied this guidance to business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that amends the accounting requirements for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. This guidance amends the
applicable business combination accounting guidance that the FASB issued in December 2007. This amended guidance requires that pre-acquisition contingencies be recognized at fair value, if
fair value can be reasonably determined. If fair value cannot be reasonably determined, the guidance requires measurement based on the best estimate in accordance with contingency accounting guidance.
We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009 in connection with the adoption of the FASB's business combination guidance issued in December 2007 as discussed above.

In
December 2007, the FASB issued accounting and reporting guidance on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance defines noncontrolling interest as the
portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the parent. The new guidance requires the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent
(previously referred to as minority interest) to be clearly presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the parent's equity. The amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to any noncontrolling interest must be clearly presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. Changes in the parent's ownership interest while the
parent retains its controlling financial interest (greater than 50 percent ownership) are to be accounted for as equity transactions with no remeasurement to fair value. Upon a loss of control,
any gain or loss on the interest sold will be recognized in earnings. Additionally, any ownership interest retained will be re-measured at fair value on the date control is lost, with any
gain or loss recognized in earnings. The new guidance also requires companies to report a consolidated net income (loss) measure that includes the amount attributable to such noncontrolling interests.
We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009 and prospectively applied this guidance to all noncontrolling interests including those that arose prior to the adoption. However, as required, the
presentation and disclosure requirements of this guidance were applied retrospectively for all periods presented and impacted our consolidated financial statements as
follows:





In
2006, the FASB issued accounting guidance on fair value measurements that provides a common definition of fair value, establishes a market-based framework
or hierarchy for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance is applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and
liabilities to be measured at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued additional guidance that (1) deferred the effective date of the original guidance for one year for certain
non-financial assets and liabilities; and (2) removed certain leasing transactions from the scope of the original guidance. We adopted this new guidance for financial assets

47

---



Table of Contents

and
liabilities on January 1, 2008, and for non-financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that provides additional application guidance regarding fair value measurements. This guidance relates to determining fair value when
there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. This new guidance reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become
inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. We adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that establishes enhanced disclosures regarding fair value measurements. This guidance relates to fair value disclosures for financial instruments
that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair value. Prior to issuing this guidance, fair values for these assets and liabilities were disclosed only once a year. The new guidance
requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at
fair value. We adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In
August 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that clarifies existing guidance for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance provides clarification that in
circumstances in which a
quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: a valuation technique
that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or a quoted price for a similar liability when traded as an asset, or another valuation method that is consistent with
existing accounting guidance for fair value measurement principles. This new guidance also provides clarification that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required
to include a separate input or adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. We adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.



In
April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that is intended to bring consistency to the timing of impairment recognition, and provide improved
disclosures about the credit and non-credit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The measure of impairment that is credit-related is recognized in
earnings with the remaining amount recognized in comprehensive income. This guidance also requires increased and more-timely disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and
an aging of securities with unrealized losses. We adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.

In
March 2008, the FASB issued accounting guidance that expands disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. We adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2009
and applied the new requirements on a prospective basis. Accordingly, disclosures related to interim periods prior to the date of adoption have not been presented. As this guidance relates to
disclosures only, it had no impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

In
November 2008, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity-method investments. This guidance
clarifies the following: (1) the cost basis of a new equity-method investment should be determined using a cost-accumulation mode, which would continue the practice of including
transaction costs in the cost of investment and would exclude the value of contingent consideration; and (2) equity-method investments

48

---



Table of Contents

should
continue to be subject to other-than-temporary impairment analysis pursuant to existing accounting guidance. This guidance also provides guidance on gain recognition
when a portion of the investor's ownership is sold, how changes in classification from equity-method to cost-method should be treated, and certain other issues. We adopted this new
guidance on January 1, 2009 and applied the new requirements on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

Effect of Newly Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the FASB issued accounting guidance that amends existing guidance for fair value disclosures. This guidance requires
disclosures about items transferring into and out of Levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy; adding separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relative to
Level 3 measurements; and clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation. The Company will adopt this guidance for the first quarter of
2010, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which is effective beginning the first quarter of 2011. Since this
guidance is disclosure-only in nature, our adoption of the guidance will not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets. This guidance amends previous guidance by including: the elimination of the qualifying
special-purpose entity ("QSPE") concept; a new participating interest definition that must be met for transfers of portions of financial assets to be eligible for sale accounting; clarifications and
changes to the de-recognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale; and a change to the amount of recognized gain or loss on a transfer of financial assets accounted for
as a sale when beneficial interests are received by the transferor. Additionally, the guidance requires extensive new disclosures regarding an entity's involvement in a transfer of financial assets.
Finally, existing QSPEs (prior to the effective date of this new guidance) must be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance upon the
elimination of this concept. The Company will adopt the provisions of this new guidance effective January 1, 2010. Among other things, the Company is currently evaluating the effect adopting
this new guidance may have on the recognition of the sale of guaranteed portions of SBA loans. If the new guidance requires the Company to delay sale accounting treatment for a period of time expected
to be an accounting quarter in length, it may reduce loan sales gains recognized by the Company for the first quarter of 2010, as well as require the Company to initially account for the transfer as a
secured borrowing and establish a new asset and liability related to contractually-sold guaranteed loan portions.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on the consolidation of VIEs. This new guidance eliminates the exemption for QSPEs; revises previous guidance by replacing the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a VIE with a qualitative approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the entity's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive
benefits that could be significant to the entity; requires reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity
investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic
performance; and requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and additional disclosures about an enterprise's involvement in VIEs. The Company will adopt
the provisions of this new guidance effective January 1, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to
provide information required by this Item.

49

---





Table of Contents

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS        (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(See Note 1(r))ASSETSCash and cash equivalents

$
80,368

$
19,103Restricted cash


1,364


1,217Portfolio Assets:Loan portfolios, net of allowance for loan losses of $65,825 and $76,365, respectively


197,946


121,137Real estate held for sale


17,051


17,484Real estate held for investment, net


9,387


9,592Total Portfolio Assets


224,384


148,213Loans receivable:Loans receivableaffiliates, net of allowance for loan losses of $67 and $-0-, respectively


26,122


27,080Loans receivableSBA held for sale


821


4,901Loans receivableSBA held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses of $490 and $34, respectively


15,445


14,405Loans receivableother, net of allowance for loan losses of $-0- and $581, respectively


10,233


13,533Total loans receivable


52,621


59,919Investment security available for sale


1,836


5,251Equity investments


71,491


72,987Service fees receivable ($809 and $553 from affiliates, respectively)


850


626Servicing assetsSBA loans


1,056


722Other assets, net


31,104


20,899Total Assets

$
465,074

$
328,937LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLiabilities:Notes payable to banks

$
305,888

$
242,889Note payable to affiliate


7,838


8,658Other liabilities


26,077


11,515Total Liabilities


339,803


263,062Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)Stockholders' equity:Optional preferred stock (par value $.01 per share; 98,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding)





Common stock (par value $.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 11,483,824 and 11,331,937, respectively ; shares outstanding: 9,983,824
and 9,831,937, respectively)


115


113Treasury stock, at cost: 1,500,000 shares


(10,923
)

(10,923
)Paid in capital


103,326


101,875Accumulated deficit


(18,329
)

(37,073
)Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)


3,460


(3,726
)FirstCity Stockholders' Equity


77,649


50,266Noncontrolling interests


47,622


15,609Total Equity


125,271


65,875Total Liabilities and Equity

$
465,074

$
328,937


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

50

---





Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS        (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008Revenues:Servicing fees ($8,216 and $9,923 from affiliates, respectively)

$
9,130

$
10,813Income from Portfolio Assets


53,835


20,779Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale, net


1,327


227Interest income from SBA loans


1,251


1,606Interest income from loans receivableaffiliates


4,180


2,481Interest income from loans receivableother


389


1,766Revenue from railroad operations


3,121


3,309Other income


6,554


4,215Total revenues


79,787


45,196Expenses:Interest and fees on notes payable to banks


12,550


15,432Interest and fees on notes payable to affiliate


1,709


816Salaries and benefits


22,310


20,935Provision for loan and impairment losses


5,266


17,755Asset-level expenses


6,499


5,632Occupancy, data processing and other


13,089


11,566Total expenses


61,423


72,136Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries


(264
)

228Gain on business combinations


2,266


Income from lawsuit settlement


6,119


Earnings (loss) before income taxes


26,485


(26,712
)Income tax expense


(2,182
)

(20,204
)Net earnings (loss)


24,303


(46,916
)Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (See Note 1(r))


5,559


(241
)Net earnings (loss) attributable to FirstCity

$
18,744

$
(46,675
)Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
1.90

$
(4.55
)Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
1.83

$
(4.55
)


See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

51

---





Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)        (Dollars in thousands)

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008Net earnings (loss)

$
24,303

$
(46,916
)Other comprehensive income (loss):Net unrealized gain on security available for sale


2,803


40Foreign currency translation adjustments


5,634


(7,229
)Total other comprehensive income (loss)


8,437


(7,189
)Total comprehensive income (loss)


32,740


(54,105
)Less comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:Net (income) loss


(5,559
)

241Net unrealized gain on security available for sale


(339
)

Foreign currency translation adjustments


(912
)

1,617Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to FirstCity

$
25,930

$
(52,247
)


See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

52

---





Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        (Dollars in thousands)

FirstCity StockholdersCommon
Stock

Treasury
Stock

Paid in
Capital

Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Non-controlling
Interests
(See Note 1(r))

Total
EquityBalances, December 31, 2007

$
113

$
(5,978
)
$
101,240

$
9,602

$
1,846

$
3,209

$
110,032Net loss for 2008











(46,675
)




(241
)

(46,916
)Change in net unrealized gain on security available for sale














40





40Foreign currency translation adjustments














(5,612
)

(1,617
)

(7,229
)Exercise of common stock options








12











12Repurchase of common stock





(4,945
)













(4,945
)Stock option compensation expense








623











623Investments in majority-owned entities

















15,304


15,304Distributions to noncontrolling interests

















(1,056
)

(1,056
)Other increases in noncontrolling interests

















10


10Balances, December 31, 2008


113


(10,923
)

101,875


(37,073
)

(3,726
)

15,609


65,875Net earnings for 2009











18,744





5,559


24,303Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale














2,464


339


2,803Foreign currency translation adjustments














4,722


912


5,634Exercise of common stock options


2





307











309Stock option compensation expense








556











556Purchases of subsidiary shares in noncontrolling interests








588








(3,419
)

(2,831
)Investments in majority-owned entities

















47,866


47,866Distributions to noncontrolling interests

















(19,261
)

(19,261
)Other increases in noncontrolling interests

















17


17Balances, December 31, 2009

$
115

$
(10,923
)
$
103,326

$
(18,329
)
$
3,460

$
47,622

$
125,271


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

53

---





Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS        (Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended
December 31,2009

2008(See Note 1(r) and Note 1(t))Cash flows from operating activities:Net earnings (loss)

$
24,303

$
(46,916
)Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:Net principal advances on SBA loans held for sale


(17,826
)

(9,616
)Proceeds from the sale of SBA loans held for sale, net


23,835


5,310Proceeds applied to income on Portfolio Assets


16,752


13,995Income from Portfolio Assets


(53,835
)

(20,779
)Capitalized interest and costs on Portfolio Assets and loans receivable


(1,151
)

(981
)Provision for loan and impairment losses


5,266


17,755Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net


112


(46
)Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated subsidiaries


264


(228
)Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale, net


(1,327
)

(227
)Gain on sale of railroad property


(920
)

Gain on business combinations


(2,266
)

Depreciation and amortization


4,112


3,626Net premium amortization of loans receivable


(173
)

(293
)Stock option compensation expense


556


623Increase in restricted cash


(147
)

(708
)Decrease (increase) in service fees receivable


(245
)

216Increase in other assets


(1,947
)

(3,139
)Decrease in deferred tax benefit





20,101Increase (decrease) in other liabilities


7,397


(558
)Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities


2,760


(21,865
)Cash flows from investing activities:Purchases of property and equipment, net


(2,616
)

(1,595
)Proceeds from sale of railroad property


1,350


Cash paid for business combinations, net of cash acquired


(8,583
)

(300
)Net principal collections (advances) on loans receivable


3,726


(29,592
)Net principal advances on SBA loans held for investment


(1,794
)

(215
)Purchase of investment security available for sale





(6,500
)Net principal paydowns on investment security available for sale


4,490


1,289Purchases of Portfolio Assets


(186,487
)

(78,516
)Proceeds applied to principal on Portfolio Assets


160,874


49,041Contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries


(5,748
)

(3,102
)Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries


12,934


21,580Net cash used in investing activities


(21,854
)

(47,910
)Cash flows from financing activities:Borrowings under note payable to affiliate





10,779Borrowings under notes payable to banks


199,824


153,653Principal payments of notes payable to affiliates


(815
)

Principal payments of notes payable to banks, net


(138,046
)

(92,506
)Payments of debt issuance costs and loan fees


(1,684
)

(2,227
)Repurchase of common stock





(4,945
)Contributions from noncontrolling interests


42,552


4,824Distributions to noncontrolling interests


(19,261
)

(1,056
)Cash paid for subsidiary shares in noncontrolling interests


(2,793
)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock


309


12Net cash provided by financing activities


80,086


68,534Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents


273


(2,693
)Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


61,265


(3,934
)Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period


19,103


23,037Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$
80,368

$
19,103Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Cash paid during the period for:Interest

$
9,788

$
12,916Income taxes, net of refunds received

$
259

$
74


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

54

---





Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS        December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



FirstCity Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is a financial services company headquartered in Waco, Texas with offices
throughout the United States and Mexico and a presence in Europe and South America. When we refer to "FirstCity," "the Company," "we," "our" or "us" in this Form 10-K, we mean
FirstCity Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (consolidated).

The
Company engages in two major business segmentsPortfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution and Special Situations Platform. The Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution
business has been the Company's core business segment since it commenced operations in 1986. In the Portfolio
Asset Acquisition and Resolution business, the Company acquires portfolios of performing and non-performing loans and other assets (collectively, "Portfolio Assets" or "Portfolios"),
generally at a discount to their legal principal balances or appraised values, and services and resolves such Portfolio Assets in an effort to maximize the present value of the ultimate cash
recoveries. FirstCity acquires the Portfolio Assets for its own account or through investment entities formed with one or more other co-investors (each such entity, an "Acquisition
Partnership"). The Company engages in its Special Situations Platform business through its majority ownership in a subsidiary that was formed in April 2007. Through its Special Situations Platform,
the Company provides investment capital to privately-held middle-market companies through flexible capital structuring arrangements to generate an attractive risk-adjusted
return. These capital investments primarily take the form of senior and junior financing arrangements, but also include direct equity investments, common equity warrants, distressed debt transactions,
and leveraged buyouts. Refer to Note 18 for additional information on the Company's major business segments.



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the estimation of
future collections on Portfolio Assets used in the calculation of income from Portfolio Assets; valuation of the deferred tax asset and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes; valuation
of servicing assets, investment securities, real estate properties and loans receivable (including loans receivable held in securitization trusts); guarantee obligations and indemnifications; and
legal contingencies. These estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical
experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets; volatile financial,
real estate and foreign currency markets; and declines in business and consumer spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and
their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic
environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.

55

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)



The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FirstCity, its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries,
and certain variable interest entities. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts in prior-year financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications are not significant and have no impact on FirstCity's net earnings (loss), total assets or stockholders'
equity. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Board's ("FASB") guidance (issued in December 2007) that established new accounting and reporting standards for
noncontrolling (minority) interests in a subsidiary. Refer to Note 1(r) for more information.

If
we determine that we have a controlling financial interest in an entity, then we must consolidate the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the entity in our
consolidated financial statements. A controlling financial interest typically arises as a result of ownership of a majority of the voting interests of an entity. We may also have a controlling
financial interest in an entity through an arrangement that does not involve voting interests, such as a variable interest entity ("VIE"). In general, a VIE is an entity that has one or more of the
following characteristics (1) the entity has total equity at risk that is not sufficient to finance its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support from other
entities; (2) the group of equity owners does not have the ability to make significant decisions about the entity's activities; (3) the group of equity owners does not have the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive residual returns generated by its operations, or both; or (4) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations
to absorb the losses or the right to receive residual returns of the entity, or both, and substantially all of the entity's activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has
disproportionately few voting rights. If any of these characteristics is present, the entity is subject to a variable interests consolidation analysis, and consolidation is based on variable
interests, and not solely on ownership of the entity's outstanding voting stock. Variable interests are generally defined as contractual, ownership or other economic interests in an entity that change
with fluctuations in the entity's net asset value. The Company consolidates any VIE of which it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the enterprise that absorbs a majority of
expected losses or receives a majority of residual returns (if the losses or returns occur), or both. We are required to evaluate whether to consolidate a VIE when we first become involved and upon
subsequent reconsideration events (e.g., a purchase of additional equity interests). Generally, if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, then we initially record the assets, liabilities and
noncontrolling interests of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements at fair value. Refer to Note 19 for further information regarding the Company's investments in VIEs.

The
Company does not consolidate equity investments in 20%- to 50%-owned entities that are not VIEs where the Company does not have an effective controlling interest, or equity
investments in 20%-to 50%-owned entities that are VIEs where the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Rather, such investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting since the
Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investees' operating and financial policies. The Company also accounts for its unconsolidated equity investments in less than
20%-owned entities under the equity method of accounting. FirstCity has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these entities, despite its
comparatively smaller ownership percentage, due primarily to its active participation in the policy-making process as well as its

56

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

involvement
in the daily management activities. These entities are formed generally to share in the risks and rewards in developing new markets as well as to pool resources. Under the equity method of
accounting, the Company's investment in these unconsolidated entities is carried at the cost of acquisition, plus the Company's share of equity in undistributed earnings or losses since acquisition.

The
Company's ownership of unconsolidated equity investments at December 31, 2009 is summarized below:

Ownership
InterestAcquisition Partnerships:Domestic

20.0% - 50.0%Latin America

8.0% - 50.0%Europe

22.5% - 50.0%Operating and Servicing Entities:Domestic

39.5% - 49.0%Latin America

50.00%Europe

11.9% - 16.3%


The
Company's equity in earnings and losses from its unconsolidated foreign equity investments, except for certain of its unconsolidated European equity investments, are recorded on a
one-month delay due to the timing of FirstCity's receipt of those financial statements.

The
Company has loans receivable from certain Acquisition Partnerships and other unconsolidated equity investmentssee Note 5. In situations where the Company is not
required to advance additional funds to the Acquisition Partnership and previous losses have reduced the equity investment to zero, the Company continues to report its share of equity method losses in
its consolidated statements of operations to the extent of and as an adjustment to the adjusted basis of the related loan receivable.



For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash balances in various depository institutions that periodically exceed federally insured limits. Management
periodically evaluates the creditworthiness of such institutions.



Restricted cash includes monies due on loan-related remittances received by the Company and due to third parties.



The Company invests in performing and non-performing commercial and consumer loans, real estate and certain other assets
("Portfolio Assets" or "Portfolios"), and services and resolves such Portfolio Assets in an effort to maximize the present value of the ultimate cash recoveries. The Portfolio Assets are generally
non-homogeneous assets, including loans of varying qualities that are

57

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

secured
by diverse collateral types and real estate. Some Portfolio Assets are loans for which resolution is tied primarily to the real estate securing the loan, while others may be collateralized
business loans, the resolution of which may be based on the cash flows of the business or the underlying collateral.

The
following is a description of the classifications and related accounting policies for the Company's significant classes of Portfolio Assets:



Commencing
January 1, 2005, FirstCity adopted the FASB's accounting guidance (issued in December 2003) related to acquisitions of loans and loan
portfolios with evidence of credit deterioration ("Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans"). This guidance addresses accounting differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be
collected from an investor's initial investment in acquired loans if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to deterioration in credit quality. The guidance also requires acquired loans
with credit deterioration to be initially recorded at fair value and prohibits "carrying over" or the creation of valuation allowances in the initial accounting of acquired loans that are within its
scope. The excess cash flows expected at acquisition over the loan portfolio's purchase price is recorded as interest income over the life of the portfolio.

The
amounts paid for Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans reflect the Company's determination that the loans have experienced deterioration in credit quality since origination and that it is
probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the underlying loans. At acquisition, the Company reviews the individual loans to determine whether
there is evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan's contractual terms. If
both conditions exist, the Company determines whether each such loan is to be accounted for individually or whether such loans will be assembled into static pools based on common risk characteristics
(primarily loan type and collateral). Static pools of individual loan accounts may be established and accounted for as a single economic unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss
provision. Once a static loan pool is established, individual accounts are generally not added to or removed from the pool (unless the Company sells, forecloses or writes-off the loan). At
acquisition, the Company determines the excess of the scheduled contractual payments over all cash flows expected to be collected for the loan or loan pool as an amount that should not be accreted
("nonaccretable difference"). The excess of the cash flows from the loan or loan pool expected to be collected at acquisition over the initial investment ("accretable difference") is recognized as
interest income over the remaining life of the loan or loan pool on a level-yield basis ("accretable yield"). The discount (i.e. the difference between the cost of each loan or static pool and
the related aggregate contractual receivable balance) is not recorded because the Company does not expect to fully collect each contractual receivable balance for the loan or loan pool. As a result,
these loans and loan pools are recorded at cost (which approximates fair value) at the time of acquisition.

The
Company accounts for Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans using either the interest method or a non-accrual method (through application of the cost-recovery or
cash basis method of accounting). Application of the interest method is dependent on management's ability to develop a reasonable expectation as to both the timing and amount of cash flows expected to
be collected. In the event the

58

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Company
cannot develop or establish a reasonable expectation as to both the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected, the Company uses the cost-recovery or cash basis
method of accounting.

Interest method of accounting.Under the interest method, an effective interest rate, or IRR, is applied to the cost basis of the loan
or loan pool.
The excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows cannot be recognized as an adjustment of income or expense or on the balance sheet. The IRR that is calculated when the loan is
purchased remains constant as the basis for subsequent impairment testing (performed at least quarterly) and income recognition. Significant increases in actual, or expected future cash flows, are
used first to reverse any existing valuation allowance for that loan or loan pool; and any remaining increase may be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over the remaining
life of the loan or loan pool. Any increase to the IRR then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing and income recognition. Subsequent decreases in projected cash flows do not change the IRR,
but are recognized as an impairment of the cost basis of the loan or loan pool (to maintain the then-current IRR), and are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations through
provisions charged to operations, with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting the loan or loan pool in the consolidated balance sheets. FirstCity establishes valuation allowances for loans and
loan pools acquired with credit deterioration to reflect only those losses incurred after acquisitionthat is, the cash flows expected at acquisition that are no longer expected to be
collected. Income from loans and loan pools accounted for under the interest method is accrued based on the IRR of each loan or loan pool applied to their respective adjusted cost basis. Gross
collections in excess of the interest accrual and impairments will reduce the carrying value of the loan or loan pool, while gross collections less than the interest accrual will increase the carrying
value. The IRR is calculated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using the Company's proprietary collection models.

Cost-recovery method of accounting.If the amount and timing of future cash collections on a loan are not reasonably estimable, the
Company accounts for such asset on the cost-recovery method. Under the cost-recovery method, no income is recognized until the Company has fully collected the cost of the loan,
or until such time as the Company considers the timing and amount of collections to be reasonably estimable and begins to recognize income based on the interest method as described above. At least
quarterly, the Company performs an evaluation to determine if the remaining amount that is probable of collection is less than the carrying value of the loan or loan pool, and if so, recognizes
impairment through provisions charged to operations. The cost-recovery accounting model is permitted by FASB's accounting guidance applicable to Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans. The
carrying value of Purchased
Credit-Impaired Loans accounted for under the cost-recovery method approximated $96.3 million (including $12.7 million of loans pending management's post-purchase
evaluation) at December 31, 2009, and $20.7 million (including $4.2 million of loans pending management's post-purchase evaluation) at December 31, 2008.

Cash basis method of accounting.If only the amount of future cash collections on a loan is reasonably estimable, the Company accounts
for such asset
on an individual loan basis under the cash basis method of accounting. Under the cash basis method, no income is recognized unless collections are received during the period, or until such time as the
Company considers the timing of collections to be reasonably estimable and begins to recognize income based on the interest method as described

59

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

above.
Income is recognized for the difference between the collections and a pro-rata portion of cost on a loan. Cost allocation is based on a proration of actual collections divided by
total projected collections on the loan. Significant increases in future cash flows may be recognized prospectively as income over the remaining life of the loan through increased amounts allocated to
income when collections are subsequently received. Subsequent decreases in projected cash flows will be recognized as impairment of the loan's cost basis to maintain a constant cost allocation based
on initial projections. The cash basis method accounting model is permitted by FASB's accounting guidance applicable to Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans. Management implemented the cash basis method of
accounting for such eligible loans in 2009 as a result of increased uncertainty in the timing of future collections on recently-acquired loans (attributable primarily to the borrowers' inability to
obtain financing to refinance the loan). The carrying value of Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans accounted for under the cash basis method approximated $42.1 million at December 31, 2009.



In
September 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired an additional ownership interest in UBN, SA ("UBN") in a transaction that
was accounted for as a step-acquisition under FASB's business combination accounting guidance. As a result of the transaction, UBN became a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. As such,
FirstCity added UBN's loan portfolio to its consolidated balance sheet in September 2008. On the date of the acquisition, the amount of the loans and allowance for loan losses related to UBN's loan
portfolio approximated $69.1 million (including $67.3 million of non-performing loans) and $66.6 million, respectively.

The
allowance for loan losses on the UBN loan portfolio represents management's estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Management establishes
an allowance for loan losses through a provision charged to operations when a loan is determined to be impaired. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it
is probable the
Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when all possible means of
collection have been exhausted and the remaining balance due is deemed uncollectible. At least quarterly, management evaluates the need for an allowance on an individual-loan basis for the
UBN loan portfolio by considering information about specific borrower situations, legal collection proceedings, estimated collateral values, general economic conditions, and other factors. This
evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.



Loans
acquired without evidence of credit deterioration at acquisition for which FirstCity has the positive intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable
future are classified as held for investment and reported at their unpaid principal balance net of unamortized purchase discounts or premiums. Differences between the initial investment and the
related loan's principal amount at the purchase date are recognized as an adjustment of interest income over the life of the loan. Income on the loans is recognized under the interest method. Interest
accrual generally ceases when payments become 90 days contractually past due. A loan is impaired when based on current information and events it is probable the Company will be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan

60

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

agreement.
When a loan is determined to be impaired, management establishes an allowance for loan losses through a provision charged to operations. At least quarterly, management evaluates the need
for an allowance on an individual-loan basis by considering information about specific borrower situations, estimated collateral values, general economic conditions, and other factors.
Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management's judgment, should be charged-off. Loans are
written-off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.



Real
estate Portfolio Assets consist of real estate properties purchased from a variety of sellers or acquired through loan foreclosure. Rental income, net of
expenses, is generally recognized when received. The Company accounts for its real estate properties on an individual-asset basis as opposed to a pool basis. The following is a description of the
classifications and related accounting policies for the Company's various classes of real estate Portfolio Assets:



Real estate held for sale primarily includes real estate acquired through loan foreclosure. The Company classifies a property as held
for sale if (1) management commits to a plan to sell the property; (2) the Company actively markets the property in its current condition for a price that is reasonable in comparison to
its fair value; and (3) management considers the sale of such property within one year of the balance sheet date to be probable. Real estate held for sale is stated at the lower of cost or fair
value less estimated disposition costs. Real estate is not depreciated while it is classified as held for sale. Impairment losses are recorded if a property's fair value less estimated disposition
costs is less than its carrying amount, and charged to operations in the period the impairment is identified.

Real
estate held for investment generally includes acquired properties and is carried at cost less depreciation and amortization, as applicable. The Company classifies a property as held
for investment if the property is still under development and/or management does not expect the property to be sold within one year of the balance sheet date. The Company periodically reviews its
property held for investment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of property held for investment
is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the property. If the property is considered impaired, the impairment to
be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined by discounted cash flows or market comparisons.



Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are initially recorded at the lower of cost (i.e. the
underlying loan's carrying value) or estimated fair value less disposition costs at the date of foreclosureestablishing a new cost basis. The amount, if any, by which the carrying value
of the underlying loan exceeds the property's fair value less estimated disposition costs at the foreclosure date is charged as a loss against operations. Expenditures for repairs, maintenance, and
other holding costs are charged to operations as incurred.

61

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Real
estate properties acquired through a purchase transaction are initially recorded at the cost of the acquisition. The cost of acquired property includes the purchase price of the
property, legal fees, and certain other acquisition costs. Subsequent to acquisition, the Company capitalizes capital improvements and expenditures related to significant betterments and replacements,
including costs related to the development and improvement of the property for its intended use. Expenditures for repairs, maintenance, and other holding costs are charged to operations as incurred.

When
acquiring real estate with an existing building through a purchase transaction, the Company generally allocates the purchase price between land, land improvements, building, tenant
improvements, and intangible assets related to in-place leases based on their relative fair values. The fair values of acquired land and buildings are generally determined based on an
estimated discounted future cash flow model with lease-up assumptions as if the building was vacant upon acquisition, third-party valuations, and other relevant data. The fair value of
in-place leases includes the value of net lease intangibles for above- and below-market rents and tenant origination costs, determined on a lease-by-lease basis.
Amounts allocated to building and improvements are depreciated over their estimated remaining lives. Amounts allocated to tenant improvements, in-place lease assets and other lease-related
intangibles are amortized over the remaining life of the underlying leases. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, accumulated depreciation and amortization was not significant.



Gains on disposition of real estate are recognized upon the sale of the underlying property if the transaction qualifies for gain
recognition under the full accrual method, as prescribed by the FASB's accounting guidance on real estate sales transactions. If the transaction does not meet the criteria for the full accrual method
of profit recognition based on our assessment, we account for the sale based on an appropriate deferral method determined by the nature and extent of the buyer's investment and our continuing
involvement.



Loans receivableSBA held for sale represent the portion of U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") loans acquired and
originated by the Company that are guaranteed by the SBA. These loans are recorded at the lower of aggregate cost or estimated fair value. The fair value of SBA loans held for sale is based primarily
on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance through a charge to income. The
carrying value of SBA loans held for
sale is net of premiums as well as deferred origination fees and costs. Premiums and net origination fees and costs are deferred and included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains and losses
upon sale. SBA loans are generally secured by the borrowing entities' assets such as accounts receivable, property and equipment, and other business assets. The Company generally sells the guaranteed
portion of each loan to a third party and retains the servicing rights. The difference between the proceeds received and the allocated carrying value of the loans sold are recognized as net gains on
sales of loans. The non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans is generally classified as held for investment.

Loans
receivable consisting of loans made to affiliated entities (including Acquisition Partnerships and other equity-method investees) and non-affiliated entities, and the
non-guaranteed portion of SBA

62

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

loans,
are classified by management as held for investment. These loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized deferred
fees and costs on originated loans, and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Loan origination fees and costs, as well as purchase premiums and discounts, are amortized as level-yield
adjustments over the respective loan terms. Unamortized net fees, costs, premiums or discounts are recognized upon early repayment or sale of the loan. Repayment of the loans is generally dependent
upon future cash flows of the borrowers, future cash flows of the underlying collateral, and distributions made from affiliated entities. Interest is accrued when earned in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loans. Interest is recognized on an accrual basis at the applicable interest rate on the principal amount outstanding.

The
Company evaluates the need for impairment on loans receivable on an individual-loan basis at least quarterly by reviewing the collectibility of the loans in light of
various factors, as applicable, such as estimated future cash receipts of the borrower or underlying collateral, historical experience, estimated value of underlying collateral, prevailing economic
conditions, and industry concentrations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. We
consider a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, we determine it is probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan's contractual terms
(including scheduled interest payments). When management identifies a loan as impaired, we measure the impairment based on discounted future cash flows, except when the source of repayment is the
operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, we use the current fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. When a loan is determined
to be impaired, the Company generally ceases to accrue interest on the note and unpaid interest is reversed against interest income to the extent deemed by management to be uncollectible. When
ultimate collectibility of the impaired note is in doubt, all collections are generally applied to reduce the principal amount of such notes until the principal has been recovered, and collections
thereafter are recognized as interest income. Impairment losses are charged against an allowance account through provisions charged to operations in the period impairment is identified. Loans are
written-off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.



The Company has an investment security that consists of a purchased beneficial interest attributable to loans sold through a
securitization transaction. We classify and account for this security as available-for-sale and, accordingly, we measure the security at fair value on the consolidated balance
sheet, with unrealized gains and losses included in "Accumulated other comprehensive income." Fair value of the purchased residual interest is estimated based on the present value of expected
collections on the underlying receivables using an internal valuation model, incorporating market-based assumptions when such information is available. Additional information on the fair value
measurement is included in Note 17.

The
excess of all cash flows attributable to the beneficial interest estimated at the acquisition date over the initial investment amount (i.e. the accretable yield) is recognized
as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the interest method. The Company continues to estimate the

63

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

projected
cash flows over the life of the beneficial interest for the purposes of both recognizing interest income and evaluating impairment. Other-than-temporary is considered
to have occurred when the fair value of the security has declined below its amortized cost basis and if (1) we have the intent to sell the security; (2) it is more likely than not that
we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.



Property, equipment and leasehold improvements (reported in "Other assets" in the consolidated balance sheets) are carried at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation. Leasehold improvements
are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the improvements (or the terms of the underlying leases, if shorter). Generally, buildings and building
improvements are depreciated over 25 to 30 years; office equipment is depreciated over 3 to 10 years; depreciable rail property is depreciated over 25 years; machinery and
equipment are depreciated over 10 to 15 years; and leasehold improvements are amortized over 4 to 10 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense in the period incurred.
Expenditures for improvements and significant betterments that increase productive capacity or extend useful life are capitalized and depreciated over the useful lives of such assets. When property or
equipment is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet and any gain or loss is included in income.



The Company generally services Portfolio Assets acquired through its investment in an Acquisition Partnership. The Company does not
recognize capitalized servicing rights related to its Portfolio Assets owned by the Acquisition Partnerships because (1) servicing is not contractually separated from the underlying assets by
sale or securitization of the assets with servicing retained or separate purchase or assumption of the servicing; (2) consideration is not exchanged between the Company and the Acquisition
Partnerships for the servicing rights of the acquired Portfolio Assets; (3) the Company has ownership interests in the Acquisition Partnerships that own the Portfolio Assets it services; and
(4) the Company does not have the risks and rewards of ownership of servicing rights. The Company services, in all material respects, the Portfolio Assets owned for its own account, the
Portfolio Assets owned by the Acquisition Partnerships and, to a very limited extent, certain Portfolio Assets owned by third parties. In connection with the Acquisition Partnerships in the United
States, the Company generally earns a servicing fee, which is based on a percentage of gross cash collections generated from the Portfolio Assets. The rate of servicing fee charged is generally a
function of the average face value of the assets within each pool being serviced (the larger the average face value of the assets in a Portfolio, the lower the fee percentage within the prescribed
range), the type of assets and the level of servicing required for each asset. For the Mexican Acquisition Partnerships, the Company earns a servicing fee based on costs of servicing plus a profit
margin. The Acquisition Partnerships in Europe and South America are serviced by various entities in which the Company maintains an equity interest. In all cases, service fees are recognized when they
are earned in accordance with the servicing agreements.

64

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In
connection with the Company's SBA lending activities, the Company recognizes servicing assets through the sale of originated or purchased loans when servicing rights are retained. The
Company initially recognizes and measures at fair value purchased servicing rights and servicing rights obtained from the sale of SBA loans. The Company subsequently measures the servicing assets by
using the amortization method, which amortizes servicing assets in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. The amortization of the servicing assets is analyzed
periodically and is adjusted to reflect changes in prepayment rates and other estimates. See Note 7 for more information on servicing rights related to SBA loans.



The Company has servicing contracts with certain of its Acquisition Partnerships that entitle the Company to receive additional
compensation for servicing after a specified return to the investors has been achieved. The Company recognizes revenue related to these contracts when the investors receive the required level of
returns specified in the contracts and the Acquisition Partnerships receive cash in an amount greater than the required returns. There is no guarantee that the required level of returns to the
investors will be achieved or that any additional compensation to the Company related to the contracts will be realized. The Acquisition Partnerships record an accrued expense for these contingent
fees provided that these fees are probable and reasonably estimable.



The Company has determined that the local currency is the functional currency for its operations outside the United States (primarily
Europe and Latin America). We translate the results for our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates from the designated functional currency to the U.S. dollar using average exchange rates during the
relevant period, while we translate assets and liabilities at the exchange rate in effect at the reporting date. We report the resulting gains or losses from translating foreign currency financial
statements as a separate component of stockholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. An analysis of the changes in the cumulative adjustments for 2009 and 2008 follows
(dollars in thousands):

Balance, December 31, 2007

$
1,846Aggregate adjustment for the year resulting from translation adjustmentsand gains and losses on certain hedge transactions


(5,612
)Balance, December 31, 2008


(3,766
)Aggregate adjustment for the year resulting from translation adjustmentsand gains and losses on certain hedge transactions


4,722Balance, December 31, 2009

$
956


Increases
or decreases in expected functional currency cash flows upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction are recorded as foreign currency transaction gains or losses and
included in the Company's operations in the period in which the transaction is settled. Aggregate foreign currency transaction gains (losses) included in the consolidated statements of operations for
2009 and 2008 were ($112,000) and $46,000, respectively.

65

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In
general, monetary assets and liabilities designated in U.S. dollars give rise to foreign currency realized and unrealized transaction gains and losses, which we record in the
consolidated statement of operations as foreign currency transaction gains, net. However, we report the effects of changes in exchange rates associated with certain U.S. dollar-denominated
intercompany loans and advances to certain of our Latin American subsidiaries that are of a long-term investment nature (that is, settlement is not planned or anticipated in the
foreseeable future) as other comprehensive income or loss in our consolidated financial statements. We have determined that certain U.S. dollar-denominated intercompany loans and advances to our Latin
American subsidiaries are of a long-term investment nature.

The
net foreign currency translation gain included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) relating to the Company's Euro-denominated debt (see Note 2) was
$4,000 for 2009 and $2.6 million for 2008.



The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its 80% or greater owned subsidiaries. The Company records all
of the allocated federal income tax provision of the consolidated group in the parent corporation.

The
Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates, if any, would be recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. We reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax
assets through a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets is assessed periodically by the Company based on the more-likely-than-not realization threshold criterion. In this assessment, appropriate
consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other factors, the nature, frequency and severity
of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, excess of appreciated asset value over the tax basis of net assets, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, the Company's
experience with utilizing available operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and tax planning strategies. In making such assessments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be
objectively verified.

The
Company accounts for income tax uncertainty using a two-step approach whereby we recognize an income tax benefit if, based on the technical merits of a tax position, it
is more likely than not (a probability of greater than 50%) that the tax position would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority. We then recognize a tax benefit equal to the largest
amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement with the taxing authority, considering all information available at the reporting date. Once a financial statement
benefit for a tax position is

66

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

recorded,
we adjust it only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change. Interest and penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense.



Earnings (loss) per share ("EPS") is presented for both basic EPS and diluted EPS. We compute basic EPS by dividing net earnings (loss)
available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, plus the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents such as stock options and warrants. We exclude these common stock
equivalents from the computation of diluted EPS when the effect of inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Basic
and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share were computed as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Net earnings (loss)

$
24,303

$
(46,916
)Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests


5,559


(241
)Net earnings (loss) attributable to FirstCity

$
18,744

$
(46,675
)Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock (in thousands)


9,851


10,258Dilutive effect of:Warrants


231


Employee stock options


157


Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock and common stock equivalents


10,239


10,258Net earnings (loss) per share:Basic

$
1.90

$
(4.55
)Diluted

$
1.83

$
(4.55
)Dilutive shares excluded from above (in thousands):Warrants





233Employee stock options





174




The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the
asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the

67

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

carrying
value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of the asset exceeds its
fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market prices and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.



The Company measures the compensation cost of share-based awards using the estimated fair value of those awards on the grant date. We
recognize the compensation cost
as expense over the vesting period of the awards. See Note 12 for additional disclosure of the Company's share-based compensation.



The Company applies the provisions of FASB's accounting guidance for fair value measurements of financial and non-financial
assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring or non-recurring basis, as applicable. This guidance defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price).
This guidance also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. See Note 17 for additional information.



On
July 1, 2009, the FASB issued The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the "Codification") as the sole authoritative source of U.S. GAAP
for non-governmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The Codification was effective for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted the Codification for the quarter ending September 30, 2009. There was no impact to the Company's
consolidated financial statements as this change is disclosure-only in nature.



In
December 2007, the FASB issued accounting and reporting guidance on business combinations in consolidated financial statements. The guidance on business
combinations establishes principal requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. This guidance also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination, recognizing assets
acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, and determining what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial impact of the
business combination. We adopted this new guidance on January 1,

68

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

2009
and prospectively applied this guidance to business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that amends the accounting requirements for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. This guidance amends the
applicable business combination accounting guidance that the FASB issued in December 2007. This amended guidance requires that pre-acquisition contingencies be recognized at fair value, if
fair value can be reasonably determined. If fair value cannot be reasonably determined, the guidance requires measurement based on the best estimate in accordance with contingency accounting guidance.
We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009 in connection with the adoption of the FASB's business combination guidance issued in December 2007 as discussed above.

In
December 2007, the FASB issued accounting and reporting guidance on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance defines noncontrolling interest as the
portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the parent. The new guidance requires the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent
(previously referred to as minority interest) to be clearly presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the parent's equity. The amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to any noncontrolling interest must be clearly presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. Changes in the parent's ownership interest while the
parent retains its controlling financial interest (greater than 50 percent ownership) are to be accounted for as equity transactions with no remeasurement to fair value. Upon a loss of control,
any gain or loss on the interest sold will be recognized in earnings. Additionally, any ownership interest retained will be re-measured at fair value on the date control is lost, with any
gain or loss recognized in earnings. The new guidance also requires companies to report a consolidated net income (loss) measure that includes the amount attributable to such noncontrolling interests.
We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009 and prospectively applied this guidance to all noncontrolling interests including those that arose prior to the adoption. However, as required, the
presentation and disclosure requirements of this guidance were applied retrospectively for all periods presented and impacted our consolidated financial statements as
follows:





In
2006, the FASB issued accounting guidance on fair value measurements that provides a common definition of fair value, establishes a market-based framework
or hierarchy for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance is applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and
liabilities to be measured at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued additional guidance that (1) deferred the effective date of the original

69

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

guidance
for one year for certain non-financial assets and liabilities; and (2) removed certain leasing transactions from the scope of the original guidance. We adopted this new
guidance for financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008, and for non-financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have
a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 17 for additional information.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that provides additional application guidance regarding fair value measurements. This guidance relates to determining fair value when
there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. This new guidance reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become
inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. We adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 17 for additional information.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that establishes enhanced disclosures regarding fair value measurements. This guidance relates to fair value disclosures for financial instruments
that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair value. Prior to issuing this guidance, fair values for these assets and liabilities were disclosed only once a year. The new guidance
requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at
fair value. We adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See
Note 17 for additional information.

In
August 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that clarifies existing guidance for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance provides clarification that in
circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following
techniques: a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or a quoted price for a similar liability when traded as an asset, or another valuation
method that is consistent with existing accounting guidance for fair value measurement principles. This new guidance also provides clarification that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a
reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. We adopted this
guidance in the fourth quarter of 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.



In
March 2010, the FASB issued guidance that amends existing guidance (issued in May 2009) that established the general standards of accounting and disclosure
for subsequent events. Among other things, the new guidance eliminates the requirement for SEC filers, as defined in the guidance, to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. That change is effective immediately. SEC filers continue to be required to evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued. Although the new guidance
eliminates the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, it does not prohibit SEC filers from disclosing such date. The new guidance also
clarifies the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in reissued financial statements to apply only to

70

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

such
statements that have been restated to correct an error or to apply U.S. GAAP retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that is intended to bring consistency to the timing of impairment recognition, and provide improved disclosures about the credit and
non-credit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The measure of impairment that is credit-related is recognized in earnings with the remaining amount
recognized in comprehensive income. This guidance also requires increased and more-timely disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with
unrealized losses. We adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In
March 2008, the FASB issued accounting guidance that expands disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. We adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2009
and applied the new requirements on a prospective basis. Accordingly, disclosures related to interim periods prior to the date of adoption have not been presented. As this guidance relates to
disclosures only, it had no impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. See Note 11 for additional information.

In
November 2008, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity-method investments. This guidance
clarifies the following: (1) the cost basis of a new equity-method investment should be determined using a cost-accumulation mode, which would continue the practice of including
transaction costs in the cost of investment and would exclude the value of contingent consideration; and (2) equity-method investments should continue to be subject to
other-than-temporary impairment analysis pursuant to existing accounting guidance. This guidance also provides guidance on gain recognition when a portion of the investor's
ownership is sold, how changes in classification from equity-method to cost-method should be treated, and certain other issues. We adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2009 and
applied the new requirements on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.



In January 2010, the FASB issued accounting guidance that amends existing guidance for fair value disclosures. This guidance requires
disclosures about items transferring into and out of Levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy; adding separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relative to
Level 3 measurements; and clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation. The Company will adopt this guidance for the first quarter of
2010, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which is effective beginning the first quarter of 2011. Since this
guidance is disclosure-only in nature, our adoption of the guidance will not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets. This guidance amends previous guidance by including: the elimination of the qualifying
special-purpose entity ("QSPE") concept; a new participating interest definition that must be met for transfers of

71

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

portions
of financial assets to be eligible for sale accounting; clarifications and changes to the de-recognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale; and a change to the
amount of recognized gain or loss on a transfer of financial assets accounted for as a sale when beneficial interests are received by the transferor. Additionally, the guidance requires extensive new
disclosures regarding an entity's involvement in a transfer of financial assets. Finally, existing QSPEs (prior to the effective date of this new guidance) must be evaluated for consolidation by
reporting entities in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance upon the elimination of this concept. The Company will adopt the provisions of this new guidance effective January 1,
2010. Among other things, the Company is currently evaluating the effect adopting this new guidance may have on the recognition of the sale of guaranteed portions of SBA loans. If the new guidance
requires the Company to delay sale accounting treatment for a period of time expected to be an accounting quarter in length, it may reduce loan sales gains recognized by the Company for the first
quarter of 2010, as well as require the Company to initially account for the transfer as a secured borrowing and establish a new asset and liability related to contractually-sold
guaranteed loan portions.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on the consolidation of VIEs. This new guidance eliminates the exemption for QSPEs; revises previous guidance by replacing the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a VIE with a qualitative approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the entity's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive
benefits that could be significant to the entity; requires reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity
investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic
performance; and requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and additional disclosures about an enterprise's involvement in VIEs. The Company will adopt
the provisions of this new guidance effective January 1, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.



The Company determined that it has incorrectly reported certain amounts related to Portfolio Asset activities as "Cash flows from
operating activities" in our consolidated statements of cash flows for all reporting periods prior to September 30, 2009. Upon subsequent review, the Company determined that applicable
Portfolio Asset transactions, primarily purchases and principal collections, should be reported as "Cash flows from investing activities." In this
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for reasons described below, the Company is revising its consolidated statements of cash flows so that applicable Portfolio
Asset transactions are reported as "Cash flows from investing activities" instead of "Cash flows from operating activities" for the current and prior reporting period. All financial information
contained in this Form 10-K gives effect to these revisions. The revisions did not result in a change to the Company's previously-reported revenues, expenses, net earnings (loss),
cash and cash equivalents, or stockholders' equity.

72

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Company
management considered all of the relevant quantitative and qualitative factors related to the correction of the error under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 1N, Financial
StatementsConsidering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements("SAB 108"), and determined that the impact on previously-issued and current period consolidated financial statements was not material. Therefore, the Company is revising the prior period
consolidated statement of cash flows for the immaterial error in this Form 10-K and is not amending previously-filed reports.

The
following tables reconcile the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows from the previously-reported results to the revised results for the year ended December 31,
2008which includes, as applicable, the impact of reclassification on the change in reporting noncontrolling interests attributable to the Company's adoption of the FASB guidance that
established new accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interestssee Note 1(r):

Year Ended December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:Cash flows from operating activities (as reported)

$
(49,189
)Impact of revision on purchases of Portfolio Assets


78,516Impact of revision on proceeds applied to principal on Portfolio Assets


(49,041
)Impact of reclassification on change in reporting noncontrolling interestssee Note 1(r)


(2,151
)Cash flows from operating activities (as revised)

$
(21,865
)Cash flows from investing activities (as reported)

$
(18,435
)Impact of revision on purchases of Portfolio Assets


(78,516
)Impact of revision on proceeds applied to principal on Portfolio Assets


49,041Cash flows from investing activities (as revised)

$
(47,910
)


2. Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company requires liquidity to fund its operations, Portfolio Asset acquisitions, investments in and advances to Acquisition Partnerships, capital investments in
privately-held middle-market companies, other investments, repayments of bank borrowings and other debt, and working capital to support our growth. Historically, our primary sources of
liquidity have been funds generated from operations (Portfolio Asset collections, loan sales and service fees), equity distributions from Acquisition Partnerships and other subsidiaries, interest and
principal payments on subordinated intercompany debt, dividends from the Company's subsidiaries, borrowings from credit facilities with external lenders, and other special-purpose
short-term borrowings.

Cash
generated from our operations and investments is dependent primarily upon our ability to collect on our consolidated Portfolio Assets (and Portfolio Assets in our Acquisition
Partnerships) and

73

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

loan
investments. Many factors, including general economic conditions, are essential to our ability to generate cash flows. Fluctuations in our collections, investment income, credit availability, and
adverse changes in other factors could have a negative impact on our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to support our business. Despite the deterioration in general economic and credit market
conditions over the past two years, we continue to have access to liquidity to fund our Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business segment and Special Situations Platform business segment
through our credit facility commitments with external lenders. We believe that funds generated from our operations and investments (as described above)together with existing cash and
available borrowings under our existing credit agreementswill be sufficient to finance our current operations and support our growth at least through the next twelve months.

The
following is a summary of FirstCity's primary external lending facilities that it uses to provide liquidity for equity and loan investments, Portfolio Asset acquisitions, Acquisition
Partnership investments, capital investments, and working capital:



FirstCity has a $225.0 million revolving acquisition facility with Bank of Scotland plc ("Bank of Scotland") that matures
on April 1, 2011 (as amendedsee discussion below). The revolving loan facility is used to finance the senior debt and equity portion of Portfolio Asset purchases made by FirstCity
and to provide for the issuance of letters of credit and working capital loans. The obligations of FirstCity under this facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of FirstCity and its
consolidated subsidiaries and guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's consolidated subsidiaries. The primary terms and key covenants of this revolving credit facility, as amended, are as
follows:



74

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)



At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with Bank of Scotland.

FirstCity
has $24.8 million in Euro-denominated debt on the $225.0 million revolving loan facility with Bank of Scotland described above for the purpose of
hedging a portion of the net equity investments in Europe. In general, the type of risk hedged relates to the foreign currency exposure of net investments in Europe caused by movements in Euro
exchange rates. The Company entered into the hedging relationship such that changes in the net investments being hedged are expected to be offset by corresponding changes in the values of the
Euro-denominated debt. Effectiveness of the hedging relationship is measured and designated at the beginning of each month by comparing the outstanding balance of the
Euro-denominated debt to the carrying value of the designated net equity investments. Net foreign currency translation gains included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
relating to the Euro-denominated debt was $4,000 for 2009 and $2.6 million for 2008.

On
March 30, 2009, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $225.0 million revolving loan facility to amend the definitions of "indebtedness" and
"tangible net worth" such that in the determination of "tangible net worth" and the computation of the ratio of "indebtedness to tangible net worth" for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2008 and thereafter, "tangible net worth" and "indebtedness" would be adjusted by deducting non-controlling interests in subsidiaries from liabilities and adding
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to equity (as provided by FASB's accounting and reporting guidance on non-controlling interests issued in December 2007) for fiscal
quarters ending after December 31, 2008. These amended definitions are included in the primary terms and key covenants outlined above.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $225.0 million revolving loan facility to extend the maturity date to
April 1, 2011. The credit amendment did not change the other primary terms and covenants of this loan facility. In connection with this amendment, FirstCity paid a $0.5 million amendment
fee to Bank of Scotland.



FH Partners LLC ("FH Partners"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, has a $100.0 million revolving loan facility
with Bank of Scotland that provides financing for Portfolio Asset purchases by FH Partners. This revolving loan facility matures on April 1, 2011 (as amendedsee discussion below),
and is secured by all assets of FH Partners and a guaranty by FirstCity and certain of its consolidated

75

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

subsidiaries.
The primary terms and key covenants of this revolving loan facility, as amended, are as follows:



At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with Bank of Scotland.

On
March 30, 2009, FH Partners and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $100.0 million revolving loan facility to amend the definitions of "indebtedness" and
"tangible net worth" such that in the determination of "tangible net worth" and the computation of the ratio of "indebtedness to tangible net worth" for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2008 and thereafter, "tangible net worth" and "indebtedness" would be adjusted by deducting non-controlling interests in subsidiaries from liabilities and adding
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to equity (as provided by FASB's accounting and reporting guidance on non-controlling interests issued in December 2007) for fiscal
quarters ending after December 31, 2008.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FH Partners and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $100.0 million revolving loan facility to extend the maturity date to
April 1, 2011. The credit amendment did not change the other primary terms and covenants of this loan facility.



FirstCity has a $25.0 million subordinated credit agreement with BoS(USA), Inc. ("BoS(USA)"), a subsidiary of Bank of
Scotland, which may be used to finance equity investments in new ventures, equity investments made in connection with Portfolio Asset purchases and loans made by FirstCity and its subsidiaries to
acquisition entities, provide for the issuance of letters of credit, and for working capital loans. This credit facility matures on April 1, 2011 (as amendedsee discussion below),
and is

76

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

secured
by substantially all of the assets of FirstCity and its consolidated subsidiaries and guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's consolidated subsidiaries. The primary terms and key
covenants of this loan facility, as amended, are as follows:



At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with BoS(USA).

In
connection with a previous financing arrangement, FirstCity issued a warrant to BoS(USA) to purchase 425,000 shares of the Company's voting common stock at $2.3125 per share. This
warrant also entitled BoS(USA) with additional warrants under certain specific situations to retain its ability to own approximately 4.86% of the Company's voting common stock. The warrant expired on
December 31, 2009 without being exercised.

77

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

On
March 30, 2009, FirstCity and BoS(USA) entered into an amendment to this $25.0 million subordinated credit agreement to amend the definitions of "indebtedness" and
"tangible net worth" such that in the determination of "tangible net worth" and the computation of the ratio of "indebtedness to tangible net worth" for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2008 and thereafter, "tangible net worth" and "indebtedness" would be adjusted by deducting non-controlling interests in subsidiaries from liabilities and adding
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to equity (as provided by FASB's accounting and reporting guidance on non-controlling interests issued in December 2007) for fiscal
quarters ending after December 31, 2008. These amended definitions are included in the primary terms and key covenants outlined above.

On
and effective March 26, 2010, FirstCity and Bank of Scotland entered into an amendment to this $100.0 million revolving loan facility to extend the maturity date to
April 1, 2011. The credit amendment did not change the other primary terms and covenants of this loan facility.



FirstCity Mexico SA de CV, a wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary of FirstCity, has a term note with Banco Santander, S.A.
with an unpaid principal balance of 142,240,000 Mexican pesos at December 31, 2009, which was equivalent to $11.0 million U.S. dollars on that date. The loan proceeds are used to pay
down the acquisition facility with the Bank of Scotland. Pursuant to the terms of the credit facility, FirstCity Mexico SA de CV was required to provide a stand-by letter of credit
from Bank of Scotland that would satisfy the loan balance upon demand. At December 31, 2009, FirstCity had a letter of credit in the amount of $12.6 million from Bank of Scotland under
the terms of FirstCity's revolving acquisition facility with Bank of Scotland. In the event that a demand is made under the $12.6 million letter of credit, FirstCity is required to reimburse
Bank of Scotland by making payment to Bank of Scotland for all amounts disbursed or to be disbursed by Bank of Scotland under the letter of credit.



At December 31, 2009, American Business Lending, Inc. ("ABL"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, had
a $25.0 million revolving loan facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC ("WFCF"), for the purpose of financing and acquiring SBA loans. This credit facility matures in January 2012
and is secured by substantially all of ABL's assets. In connection with this loan facility, FirstCity provides WFCF with an unconditional guaranty for all of ABL's
obligations up to maximum of $5.0 million plus enforcement costs. The primary terms and key covenants of the $25.0 million revolving loan facility, as amended, are as follows.



78

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)



At
December 31, 2009, ABL was in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in the credit agreement or other agreements with WFCF, except for the covenant
related to delinquent and defaulted loans. At the end of each month, ABL's ratio of delinquent and defaulted non-guaranteed loans should not exceed 8.0%
(ABL's measure under this condition was 9.5% at December 31, 2009). WFCF waived this covenant requirement of the agreement as of December 31, 2009.

3. Business Acquisitions

The following is a summary of acquisitions completed by the Company in 2009 and 2008 that were accounted for as business combination transactions or noncontrolling interest purchases:



On December 11, 2009, the Company, through its majority-owned Special Situations Platform subsidiary, acquired 87.45% of the
common stock of BEI Holding Corporation ("BEI"). BEI engages principally in the design, production and sale of radio broadcasting equipment and software solutions. BEI is headquartered in Illinois and
has sales throughout North America, as well as Latin America, Europe, Asia and Africa. The results of BEI's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since
December 11, 2009, and are included in our Special Situations Platform business segment (see Note 18). The acquisition compliments the investment strategies of our Special Situations
Platform business segment and provides the Company with a majority ownership interest in a leading provider of mission-critical solutions for over-the-air and Internet radio.

79

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

The
following table summarizes the consideration transferred to acquire BEI and the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair values (amounts in
thousands):

At December 11, 2009 (acquisition date):Fair value of consideration transferred:Cash




$
6Recognized amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed:Cash

$
1,571Accounts receivable


2,565Inventory


3,323Property, plant and equipment


704Other tangible assets


196Intangible assets:Proprietary technology


1,030Trade name and trademarks


878Other


121Trade and other payables


(6,572
)Borrowings


(3,000
)Total identifiable net assets





816Bargain purchase gain




$
810


The
excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable assets was recognized as a bargain purchase gain and is included in "Gain on business combinations" on the
Company's statement of operations for 2009. The gain was largely driven by depressed market conditions in the radio broadcast industry, which allowed for an attractive acquisition price. BEI
contributed net revenues of $560,000 and earnings from operations of $71,000 to the Company for the period December 11, 2009 to December 31, 2009.

The
following table provides unaudited pro forma information of the Company as if the acquisition of BEI had occurred at the beginning of each period presented. This pro forma
information is not necessarily indicative either of the combined results of operations that actually would have been realized had the acquisition been consummated during the periods for which the pro
forma information is presented, or of future results.

UnauditedPro Forma Year Ended
December 31:(dollars in thousands)

2009

2008Revenue

$
101,913

$
80,427Net earnings (loss)


17,045


(47,459
)




In September 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired an additional 7.75% ownership interest in UBN (a French
Acquisition Partnership) for $1.5 million. As a result of

80

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

the
additional equity purchase, the Company's ownership interest in UBN increased to 53.5%, resulting in UBN becoming a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The transaction was accounted for as a
step acquisition, and accordingly, UBN's assets of $23.8 million (including $1.2 million in cash) and liabilities of $1.6 million were included in the Company's consolidated
balance sheet at the date of the step acquisition. The Company previously accounted for its investment in UBN under the equity method of accounting, and the carrying amount of the Company's 45.75%
equity interest in UBN at the time of the step acquisition approximated $10.2 million. UBN's results of operations since the step acquisition date have been included in the Company's
consolidated statements of operations.

In
May 2009, the Company, through a majority-owned subsidiary (UBN), acquired additional ownership interests (ranging from 55.0% to 95.0%) in sixteen French Acquisition Partnerships for
$7.8 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, the Company acquired a majority ownership interest (i.e. controlling
financial interest) in each of the sixteen French entitiesresulting in the entities becoming consolidated subsidiaries of the Company. Prior to this transaction, the Company, through a
wholly-owned subsidiary, owned a direct equity-method investment in nine of the French entities (the aggregate carrying value of the Company's equity-method investments in these nine French entities
approximated $0.5 million at the time of the transaction). In addition, prior to this transaction, the Company, through an equity-method investee, owned an indirect equity-method investment in
all of the French entities.

The
transaction was accounted for as a business combination, and accordingly, the French entities' assets (primarily non-performing loans) and liabilities and the
noncontrolling interests were measured at fair value on the acquisition date and included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the Portfolio Assets was measured using a
discounted cash flow model, employing a 20% market discount rate, based on the projected future cash flows of the underlying loan portfolios. In management's opinion, the market discount rate used in
the cash flow model reflects the rate of return a market participant would consider for this type of loan investment. The amounts attributable to the French entities that were included in the
Company's consolidated balance sheet on the acquisition date are as follows (in thousands):

Cash

$
766Portfolio Assets


12,912Other liabilities


766Noncontrolling interests (component of FirstCity's equity)


3,080


In
addition, pursuant to accounting provisions applicable to business combinations, the Company's previously-held direct equity-method investments in nine of the French
entities were remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date. The fair value of the Company's previously-held equity interests exceeded the aggregate carrying value of
$0.5 million by approximately $1.5 million. As such, the Company recognized a $1.5 million gain attributable to the remeasurement of its previously-held equity
interests on the acquisition date (included in "Business combination gains" on the Company's consolidated statement of operations for 2009).

81

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)



In June 2008, the Company, through its majority-owned Special Situations Platform subsidiary, acquired an 80% interest in
122-132 West Pierpont Avenue in Salt Lake City, Utah for approximately $2.2 million in cash. The property consists of office and retail buildings. The estimated fair value of the
primary assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition included $1.4 million for land; $6.1 million for buildings; $2.1 million for tenant improvements and
lease-related intangible assets; and $7.6 million for a note payable. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. The results of the property's operations since
the acquisition date have been included in the consolidated financial statements.



In May 2009, the Company purchased noncontrolling interests in two majority-owned subsidiaries (UBN and WAMCO 80) already
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company paid $2.8 million in cash for the purchased noncontrolling interests. On the respective acquisition dates, the Company's
carrying values of the purchased noncontrolling interests approximated $3.6 million. Under accounting provisions applicable to noncontrolling interest transactions, the Company accounted for
the purchased noncontrolling interests as equity transactions, and recognized the $0.8 million difference between the purchase prices and the carrying values of the noncontrolling interests
acquired as an increase to the Company's consolidated paid-in capital.

4. Portfolio Assets

Portfolio Assets are summarized as follows:

December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding
Balance

Allowance for
Loan Losses

Outstanding
Balance, netLoan Portfolios:Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

$
192,920

$
6,927

$
185,993Purchased performing loans


3,986


25


3,961UBN(1):Non-performing loans


60,929


58,624


2,305Performing loans


1,555





1,555Other


4,381


249


4,132Total

$
263,771

$
65,825

$
197,946


82

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

4. Portfolio Assets (Continued)



December 31, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding
Balance

Allowance for
Loan Losses

Outstanding
Balance, netLoan Portfolios:Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

$
125,108

$
13,909

$
111,199Purchased performing loans


2,757


40


2,717UBN(1):Non-performing loans


62,208


62,150


58Performing loans


1,705





1,705Other


5,724


266


5,458Total

$
197,502

$
76,365

$
121,137




December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Real Estate Portfolios:Real estate held for sale

$
17,051

$
17,484Real estate held for investment, net(2)


9,387


9,592Total

$
26,438

$
27,076


(1)Represents
a loan portfolio that was added to FirstCity's consolidated balance sheet in September 2008 in connection with its step-acquisition
of UBN (former equity-method investee). See Notes 1(f) and 3.(2)Includes
lease-related intangible balances (net) of approximately $0.8 million and $1.0 million at December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.


Certain
Portfolio Assets are pledged to secure a $100.0 million revolving loan facility between FH Partners and Bank of Scotland (see Note 2). In addition, certain
Portfolio Assets are pledged to secure notes payable of certain consolidated affiliates of FirstCity that are generally non-recourse to FirstCity or any affiliate other than the entity
that incurred the debt.

83

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

4. Portfolio Assets (Continued)

Income
from Portfolio Assets is summarized as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Loan PortfoliosPurchased Credit-Impaired Loans

$
50,750

$
16,733Purchased performing loans


299


450UBN


1,030


402Other


610


963Real Estate Portfolios


1,146


2,231Income from Portfolio Assets

$
53,835

$
20,779


During
2009, the Company recorded provisions for loan and impairment losses, net of recoveries, by a charge to income of $3.7 millionwhich is comprised of
$1.9 million of impairment charges on real estate portfolios and $1.8 million of provision for loan losses, net of recoveries. During 2008, the Company recorded provisions for loan and
impairment losses, net of recoveries, by a charge to income of $16.9 millionwhich is comprised of $2.9 million of impairment charges on real estate portfolios and
$14.0 million of provision for loan losses, net of recoveries.

Changes
in the allowance for loan losses on Portfolio Assets are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
(76,365
)
$
(1,723
)Provisions


(5,621
)

(14,832
)Recoveries


3,776


869Charge offs


15,819


3,151Increase due to UBN step acquisition





(66,576
)Translation adjustments


(3,434
)

2,746Ending Balance

$
(65,825
)
$
(76,365
)


Accretable
yield represents the amount of income the Company can expect to generate over the remaining life of its existing Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans based on estimated future cash
flows as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield primarily result from the Company's increase in its estimates of future cash flows.
Reclassifications to nonaccretable difference from accretable yield primarily results from the Company's decrease in its

84

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

4. Portfolio Assets (Continued)

estimates
of future cash flows. Changes in accretable yield related to the Company's Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
58,114

$
35,951Additions


23,077


24,809Accretion


(16,752
)

(13,995
)Reclassification from (to) nonaccretable difference


(3,316
)

19,057Disposals


(11,304
)

(2,588
)Transfer to non-accrual


(37,131
)

(3,444
)Translation adjustments


235


(1,676
)Ending Balance

$
12,923

$
58,114


For
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company adjusted the accretable yield schedules on certain loans to reflect the residual excess of the expected future cash flows over
their carrying values. The tabular presentation above for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes a $14.2 million increase to
"Reclassification from (to) nonaccretable difference." The adjustment to the underlying accretable yield schedule did not impact the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.

Purchased
Credit-Impaired Loans for 2009 and 2008 are summarized in the table below:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Face value at acquisition

$
342,658

$
193,394Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition, net of adjustments


256,460


98,667Basis in acquired loans at acquisition


184,231


73,858


85

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

5. Loans Receivable

The following is a composition of the Company's loans receivable by loan type and region:

December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Domestic:Commercial and industrial:Affiliates, net of allowance for loan losses of $67 and $-0-, respectively

$
13,177

$
12,794SBA, net of allowance for loan losses of $490 and $34, respectively


16,266


19,306Other, net of allowance for loan losses of $-0- and $581, respectively


1,402


2,732Real estate:Other


8,831


10,801Foreigncommercial and industrial:Affiliates


12,945


14,286Total loans, net

$
52,621

$
59,919


Loans receivableaffiliates

Loans receivableaffiliates, which are designated by management as held for investment, are summarized as follows:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding balance

$
24,757

$
25,747Allowance for loan losses


(67
)

Discounts, net


(237
)

Capitalized interest


1,669


1,333Carrying amount of loans, net

$
26,122

$
27,080


86

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

5. Loans Receivable (Continued)

A
summary of activity in loans receivableaffiliates follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
27,080

$
5,447Advances


9,008


24,950Payments received


(10,336
)

(3,837
)Capitalized interest


336


853Provision for loan impairment


(67
)

Discount accretion, net


37


Other noncash adjustments





(163
)Foreign exchange gains (losses)


64


(170
)Ending Balance

$
26,122

$
27,080


Loans
receivableaffiliates represent (1) advances to Acquisition Partnerships and other affiliates to acquire portfolios of performing and non-performing
commercial and consumer loans and other assets; and (2) senior debt financing arrangements with equity-method investees to provide capital for business expansion and operations. Loans
receivableaffiliates are generally secured by the underlying collateral that was acquired with the loan proceeds. Advances to affiliates to acquire loan portfolios are secured by the
underlying collateral of the individual notes within the portfolios, which is generally real estate; whereas advances to affiliates for capital investments and working capital are generally secured by
business assets (i.e. accounts receivable, inventory and equipment). The Company recorded $0.1 million of provisions for impairment on loans receivableaffiliates in 2009.

Loans receivableSBA held for sale

Loans receivableSBA held for sale are summarized as follows:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding balance

$
821

$
4,840Capitalized costs





61Carrying amount of loans, net

$
821

$
4,901


87

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

5. Loans Receivable (Continued)

Changes
in loans receivableSBA held for sale are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
4,901

$
133Originations and advances of loans


18,063


9,736Payments received


(237
)

(120
)Capitalized costs


342


153Loans sold, net


(22,248
)

(5,001
)Ending Balance

$
821

$
4,901


Loans
receivableSBA held for sale represent the portion of SBA loans acquired and originated by the Company that are guaranteed by the SBA. These loans are generally secured
by the borrowing entities' assets such as accounts, property and equipment, and other business assets. The Company recorded no write-downs of SBA loans held for sale below their cost in 2009 and 2008.

Loans receivableSBA held for investment, net

Loans receivableSBA held for investment are summarized as follows:

December 31, 2009

December 31, 2008(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding balance

$
17,072

$
15,509Allowance for loan losses


(490
)

(34
)Discounts, net


(1,245
)

(1,120
)Capitalized costs


108


50Carrying amount of loans, net

$
15,445

$
14,405


88

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

5. Loans Receivable (Continued)

Changes
in loans receivableSBA held for investment are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
14,405

$
14,234Originations and advances of loans


3,575


3,236Payments received


(1,848
)

(3,061
)Capitalized costs


59


46Allowance for loan losses


(456
)

117Discount accretion, net


(137
)

198Charge offs


(43
)

(365
)Transfers to other real estate owned


(110
)

Ending Balance

$
15,445

$
14,405


Loans
receivableSBA held for investment represent the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans purchased or originated by the Company. These loans are generally
secured by the borrowing entities' assets such as accounts, property and equipment, and other business assets. The Company recorded net impairment provisions on SBA loans held for investment of
$0.5 million in 2009 and $0.2 million in 2008.

Changes
in the allowance for loan losses on loans receivableSBA held for investment are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
(34
)
$
(151
)Provisions


(623
)

(268
)Recoveries


124


20Charge Offs


43


365Ending Balance

$
(490
)
$
(34
)


At
December 31, 2009, the Company's recorded investment in impaired and non-accrual loans receivableSBA held for investment totaled $1.0 million.
The average recorded investment in these impaired and non-accrual loans approximated $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, there
were $0.4 million of valuation allowances specifically related to these loans.

89

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

5. Loans Receivable (Continued)

Loans receivableother

Loans receivableother, which are designated by management as held for investment, are summarized as follows:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding balance

$
9,992

$
13,929Allowance for loan losses





(581
)Discounts, net


(7
)

(20
)Capitalized interest and costs


248


205Carrying amount of loans, net

$
10,233

$
13,533


Changes
in loans receivableother are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
13,533

$
5,995Advances


7,570


14,236Payments received


(9,969
)

(5,757
)Capitalized interest and costs


43


(313
)Allowance for loan losses


581


(581
)Discount accretion, net


13


12Charge-offs


(1,548
)

Foreign exchange gains (losses)


10


(59
)Ending Balance

$
10,233

$
13,533


Loans
receivableother include loans made to non-affiliated entities and are secured by the borrowing entities' assets such as accounts receivable, inventory,
property and equipment, and various other assets. The Company recorded net impairment provisions on loans receivableother of $1.0 million in 2009 and $0.6 million in 2008.

Changes
in the allowance for loan losses on loans receivableother are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
(581
)
$
Provisions


(967
)

(581
)Charge-offs


1,548


Ending Balance

$


$
(581
)


90

---





Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

5. Loans Receivable (Continued)

At
December 31, 2009, the Company's recorded investment in impaired and non-accrual loans receivableother totaled $8.9 million. The average
recorded investment in these impaired and non-accrual loans approximated $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, there were no
valuation allowances specifically related to these loans. In 2009, the Company recorded accrued interest income of $0.6 million on these impaired and non-accrual loans, and reversed
approximately $0.6 million of unpaid interest on these loans against interest income.

6. Equity Investments

The Company has equity investments in Acquisition Partnerships and their general partners, and investments in various servicing and operating entities, that are accounted for under the
equity method of accountingrefer to Note 1(c). The condensed combined financial position and results of operations of the Acquisition Partnerships (which include the domestic and
foreign Acquisition Partnerships and their general partners), and the servicing and operating entities, are summarized as follows:

Condensed Combined Balance Sheets

December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Acquisition Partnerships:Assets

$
282,999

$
297,805Liabilities

$
97,135

$
92,654Net equity


185,864


205,151$
282,999

$
297,805Servicing and operating entities:Assets

$
134,384

$
126,136Liabilities

$
79,375

$
77,182Net equity


55,009


48,954$
134,384

$
126,136Total:Assets

$
417,383

$
423,941Liabilities

$
176,510

$
169,836Net equity


240,873


254,105$
417,383

$
423,941Equity investment in Acquisition Partnerships

$
41,029

$
46,084Equity investment in servicing and operating entities


30,462


26,903$
71,491

$
72,987


91

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

6. Equity Investments (Continued)

Condensed Combined Summary of Operations

Year ended December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Acquisition Partnerships:Income from Portfolio Assets

$
37,584

$
86,612Other income


442


1,540Revenues


38,026


88,152Interest expense


4,715


10,517Service fees


11,172


23,011Provision for loan and impairment losses


18,090


21,132Asset-level expenses


7,447


12,321Other operating costs


5,022


10,996Foreign currency (gains) losses


(3,234
)

14,473Income tax expense (benefit) and other taxes


(197
)

1,785Expenses


43,015


94,235Equity in earnings of subsidiaries





1,567Net loss

$
(4,989
)
$
(4,516
)Servicing and operating entities:Income from Portfolio Assets

$
26,014

$
39,899Servicing fees


20,433


40,321Other income, net


31,581


29,490Total revenues


78,028


109,710Expenses


78,202


107,613Net earnings (loss)

$
(174
)
$
2,097Equity in earnings (loss) of Acquisition Partnerships

$
(193
)
$
962Equity in loss of servicing and operating entities


(71
)

(734
)$
(264
)
$
228


In
September 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired an additional 7.75% ownership interest in UBN (refer to Note 3). As a result of this additional equity
purchase, the Company's ownership interest in UBN increased to 53.5%, resulting in UBN converting from an equity-method investment to a consolidated subsidiary of the Company at the acquisition date.
The Company previously accounted for its investment in UBN under the equity method of accounting. As such, the assets, liabilities and equity of UBN are not included in the applicable balance sheet
tables above and below at December 31, 2008; and its results of operations from September 9, 2008 to December 31, 2008 are not included in the applicable earnings tables above and
below for the year ended December 31, 2008.

92

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

6. Equity Investments (Continued)

At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Acquisition Partnerships' total carrying value of loans accounted for under non-accrual methods of accounting
(i.e. cost-recovery or cash basis method) approximated $180.0 million and $136.2 million, respectively.

The
combined assets and equity (deficit) of the underlying Acquisition Partnerships and the servicing and operating entities, and the Company's equity investments in those unconsolidated
entities are summarized by geographic region below.

December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Assets:Domestic:Acquisition Partnerships

$
58,190

$
62,249Operating entities


31,481


19,787Latin America:Acquisition Partnerships


139,214


142,340Servicing entities


13,328


14,122Europe:Acquisition Partnerships


85,595


93,216Servicing entities


89,575


92,227$
417,383

$
423,941


93

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

6. Equity Investments (Continued)



December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Equity:Domestic:Acquisition Partnerships

$
36,696

$
29,614Operating entities


5,574


3,710Latin America:Acquisition Partnerships


115,768


128,416Servicing entities


427


1,970Europe:Acquisition Partnerships


33,400


47,121Servicing entities


49,008


43,274$
240,873

$
254,105Equity investment in Acquisition Partnerships, and Servicing and Operating entities:Domestic:Acquisition Partnerships

$
13,575

$
14,542Operating entities


1,659


953Latin America:Acquisition Partnerships


17,532


18,657Servicing entities


2,677


2,876Europe:Acquisition Partnerships


9,922


12,885Servicing entities


26,126


23,074$
71,491

$
72,987


94

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

6. Equity Investments (Continued)

Revenues
and earnings (losses) of the underlying Acquisition Partnerships and the servicing and operating entities, and the Company's share of equity in earnings (losses) of those
unconsolidated entities are summarized by geographic region below.

Year ended December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Revenues:Domestic:Acquisition Partnerships

$
9,624

$
10,915Operating entities


30,095


24,563Latin America:Acquisition Partnerships


11,908


36,055Servicing entities


10,064


18,470Europe:Acquisition Partnerships


16,494


41,182Servicing entities


37,869


66,677$
116,054

$
197,862Net earnings (loss):Domestic:Acquisition Partnerships

$
2,758

$
(3,535
)Operating entities


1,863


2,410Latin America:Acquisition Partnerships


(6,196
)

(19,533
)Servicing entities


(2,082
)

(1,104
)Europe:Acquisition Partnerships


(1,551
)

18,552Servicing entities


45


791$
(5,163
)
$
(2,419
)Equity in earnings (loss) of Acquisition Partnerships, and Servicing and Operating entities:Domestic:Acquisition Partnerships

$
1,233

$
(1,916
)Operating entities


940


953Latin America:Acquisition Partnerships


(828
)

(2,215
)Servicing entities


(1,041
)

(556
)Europe:Acquisition Partnerships


(598
)

5,093Servicing entities


30


(1,131
)$
(264
)
$
228


95

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

6. Equity Investments (Continued)

At
December 31, 2009, the Company had $24.8 million in Euro-denominated debt for the purpose of hedging a portion of the net equity investments in Europe. In
general, the type of risk hedged relates to the foreign currency exposure of net investments in Europe caused by movements in Euro exchange rates. The Company designated the hedging relationship such
that changes in the net investments being hedged are expected to be offset by corresponding changes in the values of the Euro-denominated debt. Effectiveness of the hedging relationship is
measured and designated at the beginning of each month by comparing the outstanding balance of the Euro-denominated debt to the carrying value of the designated net equity investments. Net
foreign currency translation gains included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) relating to the Euro-denominated debt was $4,000 for 2009 and $2.6 million for 2008.

7. Servicing AssetsSBA Loans

The Company recognizes servicing assets through the sale of originated or purchased SBA loans when the rights to service those loans are retained. Servicing rights purchased or resulting
from the sale of loans are initially recognized at fair value at the date of acquisition or transfer. The Company subsequently measures the carrying value of the servicing assets by using the
amortization method, which amortizes the servicing assets in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, and evaluates servicing assets for impairment based on fair value at
each reporting date. The Company evaluates the possible impairment of servicing assets based on the difference between the carrying amount and current fair value of the servicing assets. Impairment is
charged to servicing fees in the period recognized.

Changes
in the Company's amortized servicing assets are as follows:

Year ended December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Beginning Balance

$
785

$
885Servicing assets capitalized


543


95Servicing assets amortized


(213
)

(195
)Ending Balance

$
1,115

$
785Reserve for impairment of servicing assets:Beginning Balance

$
(63
)
$
(42
)Impairments


(49
)

(79
)Recoveries


53


58Ending Balance

$
(59
)
$
(63
)Ending Balance (net of reserve)

$
1,056

$
722Fair value of amortized servicing assets:Beginning balance

$
773

$
843Ending balance

$
1,162

$
773


96

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

7. Servicing AssetsSBA Loans (Continued)

The
Company relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its servicing assets. This model calculates estimated fair value of the servicing assets using
significant assumptions including a discount rate of 12.1%, prepayment speeds of 14.0% to 15.0% (depending on certain characteristics of the related loans), and weighted average lives of the
underlying assets ranging from 57 to 300 months and a combined weighted average life of 208 months. In the event future prepayments are significant or impairments are incurred, and
future expected cash flows are inadequate to cover the unamortized servicing assets, additional amortization or impairment charges would be recognized.

97

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

8. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following:

Notes payable to banks:

Interest Rate

Other Terms and Conditions

Outstanding
Borrowings
as of
December 31,
2009

Outstanding
Borrowings
as of
December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Bank of Scotland $225 million revolving loan facility:



Secured by substantially all assets of FirstCity and certain subsidiaries andUS Dollar denominated, Tranche 1

LIBOR-indexed (0.23125% at December 31, 2009) plus 2.5%

guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's consolidated subsidiaries,

$
157,500

$
96,380US Dollar denominated, Tranche 2

Prime (3.25% at December 31, 2008) plus 0.5%

matures April 2011 (as amended)





2,000Euro currency denominated

LIBOR-indexed (.43625% at December 31, 2009) plus 2.5%




24,824


32,125Bank of Scotland $100 million revolving loan facility

LIBOR-indexed (.23313% at December 31, 2009) plus 2.0%

Secured by all assets of FH Partners and guaranteed by FirstCity and certain of its consolidated subsidiaries, matures April 2011
(as amended)


58,506


68,015BoS(USA) $25 million subordinated credit agreement

LIBOR + 5.0%

Secured by substantially all assets of FirstCity and certain subsidiaries and guaranteed by substantially all of FirstCity's
consolidated subsidiaries, matures April 2011 (as amended)


25,000


7,488WFCF $25 million revolving loan facility

Alternate interest rates based on Wells Fargo base rate plus margin, LIBOR plus margin, or 7.5%

Secured by assets of ABL and guaranteed by FirstCity up to $5.0 million, matures January 2012


10,694


13,449Banco Santander term loan denominated in Mexican pesos

28-day Mexican index rate (TIIE) plus 2.0%

Secured by Bank of Scotland letter of credit, matures November 2010, commitment amount 142.2 million MXN


10,986


10,766Bank of America term loan

Greater of (prime or federal funds rate plus 0.5%) plus margin, or LIBOR plus margin

Secured by assets of FirstCity's consolidated railroad subsidiaries, matures March 2011


3,086


3,490Bank of America $1 million revolving loan facility

Greater of (prime or federal funds rate + 0.5%) plus margin, or LIBOR plus margin

Secured by assets of FirstCity's consolidated railroad subsidiaries, matures March 2011


395


Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust term loan

6.07% fixed

Secured by assets of Oregon Short Line Building, matures April 2016


7,452


7,556B.E.S.V. term loan

1-month Eurobor + 3.5%

Secured by UBN's beneficial interests in certain portfolio entities, matures May 2011


5,433


American Bank term loan

5.0% fixed

Secured by assets of FC Washington and guaranteed by FirstCity, matures May 2011


493


707Participations payable

9.9% - 23.2% imputed rates

Participation agreements on 10% - 33% of net cash flows received on portfolios


1,519


913305,888


242,889Note payable to affiliate:MCS Trust SA de CV term loan

20.0% fixed

Secured by assets of FC Acquisitions, SRL de CV, matures June 2020


7,838


8,658Total notes payable





$
313,726

$
251,547


98

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

8. Notes Payable (Continued)

Refer
to Note 2 for a description of the terms related to the Company's Senior Credit Facility, Acquisition Facility and Subordinated Credit Facility at December 31, 2009
and other matters concerning the Company's liquidity.

Under
terms of certain borrowings, the Company and its subsidiaries are required to maintain certain tangible net worth levels and debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios. The
terms also restrict future levels of debt. At December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. The aggregate principal maturities of notes payable (as amended) for the
five years ending December 31, 2012 are as follows: $11.6 million in 2010, $275.3 million in 2011, $10.7 million in 2012, $0.7 million in 2013, and
$15.4 million in 2015 and thereafter.

9. Stockholders' Equity

The Company's common stock shareholders are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of common stockholders. In order to preserve certain tax benefits
available to the Company, transactions involving stockholders holding or proposing to acquire more than 4.75% of outstanding common shares are prohibited unless the prior approval is obtained from the
Company's Board of Directors.

The
Company's Board of Directors may issue an additional series of optional preferred stock and designate the relative rights and preferences of the optional preferred stock when and if
issued. Such rights and preferences can include liquidation preferences, redemption rights, voting rights and dividends and shares can be issued in multiple series with different rights and
preferences. The Company has no current plans for the issuance of an additional series of optional preferred stock.

Under
a stock repurchase plan that was approved by the Board of Directors in 2006 (as amended in 2008), FirstCity was authorized to repurchase up to 1,500,000 shares of its common stock.
In 2008,
FirstCity completed the purchase of 1,500,000 common stock shares under this plan by acquiring 919,500 shares of its common stock on the open market for approximately $4.9 million.

In
connection with a previous financing arrangement, FirstCity issued a warrant to BoS(USA) to purchase 425,000 shares of the Company's voting common stock at $2.3125 per share. This
warrant also entitled BoS(USA) with additional warrants under certain specific situations to retain its ability to own approximately 4.86% of the Company's voting common stock. The warrant expired on
December 31, 2009 without being exercised.

99

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

10. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of the following as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments

$
956

$
(3,766
)Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale(1)


2,504


40Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

$
3,460

$
(3,726
)


(1)Includes
$1.4 million at December 31, 2009 attributable to FirstCity's proportionate share of net unrealized gains recorded by an investee
accounted for under the equity method of accounting.


11. Foreign Currency Exchange Risk Management

We use Euro-denominated debt as a non-derivative financial instrument to partially offset the Company's business exposure to foreign currency exchange risk
attributable to our net investments in Europe. Our focus is to manage the economic risks associated with our European subsidiaries, which are the foreign currency exchange risks that will ultimately
be realized when we exchange one currency for another. To help protect the Company's net investment in certain of its European subsidiary operations from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, management denominates a portion of the Euro-denominated debt in the same functional currency used by the European subsidiaries. At December 31, 2009, the Company carried
$24.8 million in Euro-denominated debt and designated the debt as a non-derivative hedge of its net investment in certain European subsidiaries. The Company designated
the hedging relationship such that changes in the net investments being hedged are expected to be naturally offset by corresponding changes in the value of the Euro-denominated debt. We
consider our investments in European subsidiaries to be denominated in a relatively stable currency and of a long-term nature.

The
effective portion of the net foreign investment hedge is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. Any
ineffective portion of the net foreign investment hedge is recognized in earnings as other income (expense) during the period of change. Effectiveness of the hedging relationship is measured and
designated at the beginning of each month by comparing the outstanding balance of the Euro-denominated debt to the carrying value of the designated net equity investments.

At
December 31, 2009, the carrying value and line item caption of the Company's non-derivative instrument was reported on the consolidated balance sheet as follows (in
thousands):

Non-Derivative
Instrument in
Net Investment
Hedging Relationship

Balance Sheet
Location

Carrying
ValueEuro-denominated debt

Notes payable to banks

$
24,824


100

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

11. Foreign Currency Exchange Risk Management (Continued)

The
effect of the non-derivative instrument qualifying and designated as a hedging instrument in net foreign investment hedges on the consolidated financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was as follows (in thousands):

Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI
(Effective Portion)



Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)Non-Derivative
Instrument in
Net Investment
Hedging Relationship

Year Ended
December 31,
2009

Year Ended
December 31,
2008

Location of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)

Year Ended
December 31,
2009

Year Ended
December 31,
2008Euro-denominated debt

$
4

$
2,629

Other income (expense)

$


$



12. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has two stock option and award plans for the primary benefit of its non-management directors and key employeesthe 2004 Stock Option and Award Plan
and the 2006 Stock Option and Award Plan. These plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and enable the Company to make stock awards up to a total of 800,000
common shares in various forms and combinations including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, performance-based awards and restricted stock. Shares subject to options granted under
these plans that terminate without being exercised will become available for grant.

In
addition, at the 2009 annual meeting of FirstCity stockholders held on November 13, 2009, the stockholders approved the 2010 Stock Option and Award Plan. This plan, which will
also be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, will enable the Company to make stock awards up to a total of 300,000 common shares (net of shares cancelled and
forfeited) in various forms and combinations including stock options, performance shares and restricted stock. The 2010 Stock Option and Award Plan will become effective on April 1, 2010.

At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company's stock-based compensation arrangements consisted of stock options only. The Company's stock option awards are generally granted with an
exercise price equal to the market price of FirstCity's common stock at the date of issuance. These stock option awards generally vest based on four years of continuous service from the date of grant
and have ten-year contractual terms. Certain stock options issued to non-employee directors are exercisable immediately.

Accounting
guidance on share-based payments requires companies to estimate the fair value of the awards on the date of the grant using an option-pricing model. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine fair value of its stock option awards. All options are amortized ratably over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the
vesting periods. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense only for those option shares that are expected to vest, based on the Company's historical experience and future expectations.
The Company recorded
share-based compensation expense of $0.6 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

101

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

12. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the grant date. The Company uses assumptions relating to expected life of
options granted, expected volatility and risk-free interest rate to determine the fair value of stock option awards. The expected life of options granted represents the period of time for
which the options are expected to be outstanding, taking into account the percentage of option exercises, the percentage of options that expire unexercised and the percentage of options outstanding.
The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock over the estimated expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the
U.S. Treasury rate with a maturity date corresponding to the stock options' expected life. The Company does not currently anticipate paying any cash dividends on its common stock. Consequently, the
Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the options-pricing model. The Company also estimates option forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures significantly differ from those estimates. To determine an expected forfeiture rate, the Company uses historical experience as a proxy for forfeitures.

The
following table sets forth the grant-date fair value of stock options awarded in 2009 and 2008 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the Company's underlying
weighted average assumptions.

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008Weighted average grant date fair value


$5.21 - $6.04

$
3.05Volatility


78% - 92
%

78
%Risk-free interest rate


2.5
%

3.73
%Expected life in years


7.8 - 10


5Dividend yield


Zero


Zero


102

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

12. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

A
summary of the Company's stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is presented below:

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value(in thousands)Outstanding at December 31, 2007


879,150

$
6.67Granted


30,000


4.69Exercised


(5,000
)

2.43Expired


(7,500
)

29.69Forfeited


(85,500
)

8.28Outstanding at December 31, 2008


811,150

$
6.24Granted


300,000


6.93Exercised


(187,250
)

3.05Expired





Forfeited


(2,500
)

9.85Outstanding at December 31, 2009


921,400

$
7.10


6.22

$
1,113Exercisable at December 31, 2008


703,237

$
5.69Exercisable at December 31, 2009


601,900

$
6.95


4.56

$
965


The
total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2009 and 2008 was $0.8 million and $13,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately
$1.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the stock option plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over
a weighted average period of 1.6 years.

A
summary of the status and changes of FirstCity's non-vested shares as of December 31, 2009, and changes during 2009 is presented below:

Shares

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNon-vested at January 1, 2009


107,913

$
7.06Granted


300,000

$
5.72Vested


(86,538
)
$
6.71Forfeited


(1,875
)
$
9.85Non-vested at December 31, 2009


319,500

$
5.89


103

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

13. Income Taxes

Income tax expense from continuing operations consists of:

Year Ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Federal and state current expense (benefit)

$
98

$
(164
)Federal deferred expense





20,101Foreign current expense


1,905


169Foreign deferred expense


179


98Total

$
2,182

$
20,204


The
actual income tax expense attributable to earnings from continuing operations differs from the expected tax expense (computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate of 35% to
earnings from continuing operations before income taxes, non-controlling interest and accounting change) as follows:

Year Ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Computed expected tax expense (benefit)

$
7,103

$
(9,349
)Reduction in income taxes resulting from:Expired net operating loss carryforward


29,963


Change in valuation allowance


(37,066
)

29,450Alternative minimum tax and state and foreign income tax


2,182


103$
2,182

$
20,204


104

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

13. Income Taxes (Continued)

The
following table displays the significant components of our deferred tax assets, deferred tax liabilities, and valuation allowance as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:

December 31,2009

2008(Dollars in thousands)Deferred tax assets (liabilities):Investments in Acquisition Partnerships, principally due to differences in basis for tax and financial reporting purposes

$
15,889

$
12,286Intangibles, principally due to differences in amortization


324


485Tax basis in fixed assets less than book basis


123


49Foreign non-repatriated earnings


(4,434
)

(5,208
)Other


(2,462
)

1,714Capital loss carryforwards


16,013


18,342Federal net operating loss carryforwards


43,520


78,371Net gross deferred tax assets


68,973


106,039Valuation allowance


(68,973
)

(106,039
)Net deferred tax assets

$


$



The
Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if,
based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed
periodically by the Company based on the more-likely-than-not realization threshold criterion. In the assessment, appropriate consideration is given to all positive
and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other factors, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses,
forecasts of future profitability, excess of appreciated asset value over the tax basis of net assets, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, the Company's experience with utilizing available
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and tax planning strategies. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based
on changes in tax laws between our projected operating performance, our actual results and other factors.

For
purposes of evaluating the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. At December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Company established a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets due to the lack of sufficient objective evidence regarding the realization of these assets in the foreseeable
future. Regardless of the deferred tax valuation allowance established at December 31, 2009, the Company continues to retain net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of
approximately $124 million available to offset future federal taxable income, if any, through the year 2027. To the extent that the Company

105

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

13. Income Taxes (Continued)

generates
taxable income in the future to utilize the tax benefits of the related deferred tax assets, subject to certain potential limitations, it may be able to reduce its effective tax rate by
reducing the valuation allowance. At December 31, 2009, the expiration dates of the Company's net operating loss carryforwards are as follows: $68.8 million in 2010; $0.2 million
in 2011; $5.8 million in 2012; and $49.5 million from 2018 through 2027.

On
October 1, 2007 the Entrepreneurial Tax of Unique Rate (referred to by its Spanish acronym, IETU or "Flat Tax") in Mexico was published. The Flat Tax law was effective on
January 1, 2008 and replaces the existing asset-based tax. The Flat Tax applies to a different tax base than the income tax and will be paid if the Flat Tax exceeds the income tax computed
under existing law. Under accounting guidance for income taxes, the effects of the Flat Tax should be reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The Flat Tax did not significantly impact the
Company's deferred tax assets recognized as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

The
Company accounts for income tax uncertainty using a two-step approach whereby we recognize an income tax benefit if, based on the technical merits of a tax position, it
is more likely than not (a probability of greater than 50%) that the tax position would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority. We then recognize a tax benefit equal to the largest
amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement with the taxing authority, considering all information available at the reporting date. Once a financial statement
benefit for a tax position is recorded, we adjust it only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change. The difference between the benefit recognized for a
position in accordance with this FIN 48 model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit ("UTB").

The
gross amount of UTBs on uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2009 approximated $299,000, which if recognized, would impact the Company's effective income tax rate. A
reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits for 2009 follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2007

$
579Payments and settlements


(2
)Lapse of statute of limitations


(228
)Balance at December 31, 2008


349Payments and settlements


(50
)Lapse of statute of limitations


Balance at December 31, 2009

$
299


The
Company records interest and penalties related to income tax uncertainties in the provision for income taxes. At December 31, 2009, interest and penalties of $92,000 are
included in "Other liabilities" as income taxes payable.

In
a letter dated March 26, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service notified FirstCity of the completion of its examination on the Company's 2004 federal income tax return. The
examination resulted in no changes to FirstCity's original tax return as filed. FirstCity currently files tax returns in approximately 35 states, and one of its consolidated subsidiaries is currently
being examined in two states for the year

106

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

13. Income Taxes (Continued)

2004.
Tax year 1994 and subsequent years are open to federal examination, and tax year 2005 and subsequent years are open to state examination.

14. Employee Benefit Plan

The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) employee profit sharing plan pursuant to which the Company matches employee contributions at a stated percentage of employee contributions
to a defined maximum. The Company's contributions to the 401(k) plan were $193,000 in 2009 and $184,000 in 2008.

15. Leases

The Company leases its corporate headquarters under a non-cancellable operating lease. The lease calls for monthly payments of $12,000 through its expiration in December
2011. Rental expense under this lease was $144,000 for 2009 and 2008. The Company also leases office space and equipment under operating leases expiring in various years prior to 2017. Rental expense
under these leases for 2009 and 2008 was $769,000 and $793,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the future minimum lease payments under all non-cancellable operating leases
are as follows: $885,000 in 2010; $732,000 in 2011; $404,000 in 2012; $254,000 in 2013; $188,000 in 2014; and $282,000 thereafter.

16. Consolidated Railroad Operations

The following table displays the amount of expenses attributable to the Company's consolidated railroad operations that are included in the total amounts reported for the corresponding
captions in the Company's consolidated statements of operations for 2009 and 2008:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Interest and fees on notes payable

$
150

$
154Salaries and benefits


1,019


1,031Occupancy, data processing and other


1,088


1,245Total operating expenses attributable to railroad operations

$
2,257

$
2,430


17. Fair Value



The
fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction
occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques
that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset

107

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

17. Fair Value (Continued)

or
liability. The accounting guidance on fair value measurements (see Note 1(r)) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques to measure fair value.
The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements
involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:



The
level of fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is most-significant to the fair value
measurement in its entirety.



At December 31, 2009, the only financial or non-financial item that the Company measures at fair value on a
recurring basis was its investment security available for sale (represents a beneficial interest attributable to loans sold through a securitization transaction that the Company purchased in 2008 for
$6.5 million). The Company measures fair value for this investment security using a discounted cash flow model based on assumptions and inputs that are corroborated by little or no observable
market data (Level 3 measurement). The Company uses this measurement technique because pricing information and market-participant assumptions for purchased beneficial interests in similar
securitization transactions are not readily accessible and frequently released to the public. At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the carrying value of the investment security
(at fair value) approximated $1.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively. The table below summarizes the changes to

108

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

17. Fair Value (Continued)

the
Level 3 asset measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:

Year Ended
December 31,(Dollars in thousands)

2009

2008Balance, beginning of period

$
5,251

$
Total net gains (losses) for the period included in:Net income (loss)





Other comprehensive income


1,075


40Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net


(4,490
)

5,211Net transfers into Level 3





Balance, end of period

$
1,836

$
5,251




The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain financial and non-financial assets at fair value on a
non-recurring basis. These adjustments to fair value generally result from write-downs of financial and non-financial assets as a result of impairment or application of
lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting. For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis that were still on the Company's
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 and 2008, the following table provides (1) the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment; (2) the carrying
values of the related assets; and (3) the decrease in value of the assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for which the fair value adjustment has been
included in the Company's operations relating to the assets held at period-end:

Total LossesCarrying Value at December 31, 2009Year Ended
December 31, 2009(Dollars in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

TotalPortfolio Assetsloans(1)

$


$


$
12,460

$
12,460

$
(1,301
)Loans receivableSBA held for investment(1)








829


829


(499
)Real estate held for sale(2)





7,231





7,231


(1,858
)$
(3,658
)


109

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

17. Fair Value (Continued)



Total LossesCarrying Value at December 31, 2008(3)Year Ended
December 31, 2008(Dollars in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

TotalPortfolio Assetsloans(1)

$


$


$
5,677

$
5,677

$
(2,148
)Loans receivableSBA held for investment(1)








140


140


(248
)Servicing assetsSBA loans








534


534


(21
)$
(2,417
)


(1)Represents
the carrying value and related losses of impaired loans that were measured for impairment using the estimated fair value of the collateral for
collateral-dependent loans. The carrying value of loans fully charged-off is zero.(2)Represents
the carrying value and related losses of foreclosed real estate properties that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial
classification as foreclosed assets.(3)Pursuant
to the Company's adoption of FASB's accounting guidance on fair value measurements in 2008, the Company did not apply the fair value measurement
provisions to non-recurring fair value measurements of non-financial Portfolio Assets (i.e. real estate held for sale) upon recognition of impairment charges on such
assets during 2008. In accordance with guidance, the Company applied the fair value measurement provisions to non-financial Portfolio Assets effective January 1, 2009. See
Note 1(r).


The
fair values of "Portfolio Assetsloans" and "Loans receivableSBA held for investment," as measured on a non-recurring basis, are based on
collateral valuations using observable and unobservable inputs, adjusted for various considerations such as market conditions, economic and competitive environment, and other assets with similar
characteristics (i.e. type, location, etc.) that, in management's opinion, reflect elements a market participant would consider. The Company classifies its fair value measurement techniques for
these assets as Level 3 inputs for the following reasons: (1) distressed asset transactions generally occur in inactive markets for which observable market prices are not readily
available (i.e. price quotations vary substantially over time and among market-makers, and pricing information is generally not released to the public); and (2) the Company's valuation
techniques that are most-significant to the fair value measurements are principally derived from assumptions and inputs that are corroborated by little or no observable market data.

The
fair value of "Real estate held for sale," as measured on a non-recurring basis, is generally based on collateral valuations using observable inputs.

We
attempt to base our fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is our policy to
maximize the use of observable inputs, when reasonably available and without undue cost, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements in accordance with the fair
value hierarchy. Fair value measurements for assets where there exists limited or no observable market data and, therefore, are based principally on our own estimates and assumptions, are often
calculated based on collateral valuations adjusted for the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset, and other such factors. Additionally, there may be inherent
weaknesses in any valuation

110

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

17. Fair Value (Continued)

technique,
and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, that could significantly affect the results of current or future values.



In
addition to the methods and assumptions we use to measure the fair value of financial instruments as discussed in the section above, we used the following
methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
The fair value estimates were based on pertinent information that was available to management as of the respective dates. The fair value estimates have not been revalued for purposes of these
financial statements since those dates and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented. Furthermore, because active markets do not exist for a
significant portion of the Company's financial instruments, management uses present value techniques and other valuation models to estimate the fair values of its financial instruments. These
valuation methods require considerable judgment, and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used. The amounts provided herein are
estimates of the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (i.e., not a forced transaction, such as a liquidation or
distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date. However, the calculated fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and,
in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the financial instrument. Accordingly, the estimates provided herein do not necessarily indicate amounts which could be realized in a current
exchange. The Company believes the imprecision of an estimate could be significant.

The
carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company's consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents:The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value at December 31, 2009 and
2008.

Loans Receivable Held-for-Sale:Loans held-for-sale (primarily SBA loans
held-for-sale) are carried on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is
generally based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics. The carrying amount of loans held-for-sale approximated fair value at
December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Loan Portfolio Assets and Loans Receivable:Estimated fair values of Portfolio Assetsloans and fixed-rate loans are
generally determined using a discounted cash flow model, adjusted by an amount for estimated losses, that employs market discount rates and other adjustments that would be expected to be made by a
market participant. The estimated fair value for variable-rate loans that re-price frequently is based on carrying values adjusted for estimated credit losses and other
adjustments that would be expected to be made by a market participant. The estimated fair value for impaired loans is generally based on collateral valuations using observable and unobservable inputs,
adjusted for various considerations that would be expected to be made by a market participant; or discounted cash flow

111

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

17. Fair Value (Continued)

models
that employ market discount rates and other adjustments that would be expected to be made by a market participant. Management estimates and assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows and
discount rates are judgmentally determined using available market and specific borrower information. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying amounts of Portfolio Assetsloans
and loans receivable (including accrued interest) approximated $253.0 million and $178.0 million, respectively, and the estimated fair values approximated $371.1 million and
$238.4 million, respectively.

Servicing Assets:The Company relies primarily on a combination of a discounted cash flow model of future net servicing income
and analysis of
current market data to estimate the fair value of its servicing assets. The key assumptions used to calculate estimated fair value of the servicing assets include prepayment speeds; discount rate; and
weighted average lives and interest rates of the underlying loans. The fair value estimate excludes the value of the servicing rights for loans sold in which the servicing rights have not been
capitalized. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying amount of servicing assets approximated fair value.

Notes Payable to Banks:Management believes the interest rates and terms on its debt obligations approximate the rates and terms
currently offered by
other lenders for similar debt instruments of comparable terms. As such, management believes that the carrying amount of notes payable approximates fair value at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Note Payable to Affiliate:Estimated fair value of the Company's note payable to affiliate (including related interest payable)
is determined at the
present value of future projected cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the risks inherent in those cash flows. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying amounts of note and interest
payable to affiliate were $10.3 million and $9.5 million, respectively, and the estimated fair values approximated $6.5 million and $6.2 million, respectively.

18. Segment Reporting

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company was engaged in two major business segmentsPortfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business and Special Situations
Platform business.

In
the Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution business, the Company acquires and resolves portfolios of performing and non-performing loans and other assets
(collectively, "Portfolio Assets" or "Portfolios"), which are generally acquired at a discount to their legal principal balance or appraised value. Purchases may be in the form of pools of assets or
single assets. The Portfolio Assets are generally aggregated, including loans of varying qualities that are secured or unsecured by diverse collateral types and real estate. Some Portfolio Assets are
loans for which resolution is linked primarily to the real estate securing the loan, while others may be collateralized business loans for which resolution may be based either on real estate, business
assets or other collateral cash flow. Portfolio Assets are acquired on behalf of the Company or its consolidated subsidiaries, and on behalf of domestic and foreign partnerships and other entities
("Acquisition
Partnerships") in which a partially-owned affiliate of the Company is the general partner and the Company and other investors are limited partners. The Company services, manages and ultimately
resolves or otherwise disposes of substantially all Portfolio Assets acquired by the Company, its Acquisition Partnerships, or other related entities. The Company services such assets until they are
collected or sold.

112

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

18. Segment Reporting (Continued)

The
Company engages in its Special Situations Platform business through its majority ownership interest in FirstCity Denver Investment Corp. ("FirstCity Denver"), which was formed in
April 2007. Through its Special Situations Platform business, the Company provides investment capital to privately-held middle-market companies through flexible capital structuring
arrangements. The nature of the capital investments primarily takes the form of senior and junior financing arrangements, but also include direct equity investments, common equity warrants, distressed
debt transactions, and leveraged buyouts. FirstCity Denver's primary investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments, and to
generally structure the investments to be repaid or exited in twelve to thirty-six months.

Operating
segment revenues and profitability, and a reconciliation to net earnings (loss) before deduction of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Portfolio Asset Acquisition and Resolution:Total revenues

$
71,760

$
38,402Operating contribution (loss), net of direct taxes


18,260


(21,834
)Special Situations Platform:Total revenues


7,683


6,408Operating contribution, net of direct taxes


1,756


1,888Total operating income (loss), net of direct taxes


20,016


(19,946
)Corporate Overhead:Income from lawsuit settlement


6,119


Salaries and benefits, occupancy, professional and other income and expenses, net


(7,901
)

(6,738
)Income tax benefit (expense)


510


(19,991
)Net earnings (loss) attributable to FirstCity

$
18,744

$
(46,675
)


Revenues
and equity in earnings of investments from the Special Situations Platform segment are all attributable to domestic operations. Revenues and equity in earnings of investments
from the

113

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

18. Segment Reporting (Continued)

Portfolio
Asset Acquisition and Resolution segment are attributable to domestic and foreign operations as summarized as follows:

Year ended
December 31,2009

2008(Dollars
in thousands)Domestic

$
57,542

$
21,462Latin America


10,445


10,158Europe


2,553


6,015Other


16


43Total

$
70,556

$
37,678


Total
assets for each of the segments and a reconciliation to total assets are as follows:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008(Dollars in thousands)Cash and cash equivalents

$
80,368

$
19,103Restricted cash


1,364


1,217Portfolio acquisition and resolution assets:Domestic


225,406


167,211Latin America


41,248


42,426Europe


57,888


48,612Other





228Special situations platform assets


41,688


37,786Other non-earning assets, net


17,112


12,354Total assets

$
465,074

$
328,937


19. Variable Interest Entities

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with entities that involve variable interests.
Variable interests are generally defined as contractual, ownership or other economic interests in an entity that change with fluctuations in the entity's net asset value. If certain characteristics
are present in these transactions, the entity is subject to a variable interests consolidation analysis, and consolidation is based on variable interests, and not solely on ownership of the entity's
outstanding voting stock. If an entity is determined to be a VIE, we determine if our variable interest causes us to be considered the primary beneficiary. We are the primary beneficiary and are
required to consolidate the entity if we absorb a majority of expected losses or receive a majority of residual returns (if the losses or returns occur), or both. In making the determination as to
whether we are the primary beneficiary, we evaluate the design of the entity, including the risks that cause variability, the purpose for which the entity was created, and the variability that the
entity was designed to create and pass along to its interest holders. When the primary beneficiary cannot be identified through qualitative analysis, we use internal cash flow models

114

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

19. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

to
compute and allocate expected losses or residual returns to each variable interest holder. The allocation of expected cash flows is based upon the relative contractual rights and preferences of
each interest holder in the VIE's capital structure.

In
order to determine if we are considered to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we first perform a qualitative analysis, which requires certain subjective decisions regarding our
assessments, including, but not limited to, the design of the entity, the variability that the entity was designed to create and pass along to its interest holders, the rights of the parties, and the
purpose of the arrangement. If we cannot conclude after qualitative analysis whether we are the primary beneficiary, we perform a quantitative analysis. Quantifying the variability of a VIE's assets
is complex and subjective, requiring analysis of a
significant number of possible future outcomes as well as probability of each outcome occurring. The result of each possible outcome is allocated to the parties holding interests in the VIE and, based
on the allocation, a calculation is performed to determine which party, if any, is the primary beneficiary.

The
following provides a summary for which the Company has entered into significant transactions with different types of VIEs:

Acquisition Partnership VIEsThe Company is involved with Acquisition Partnerships that were formed with one or more
investors to invest in Portfolio Assets. These Acquisition Partnership are typically financed through debt and/or equity provided by the investors (including FirstCity). Certain of these Acquisition
Partnerships are VIEs because generally they do not have sufficient equity to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support, or the investors do not have the ability to
make significant decisions about the Acquisition Partnership's activities. The voting interests for all but two of the Acquisition Partnership VIEs are either wholly-owned or majority-owned by
non-affiliated investors, and the Company is not the primary beneficiary of these minority-owned Acquisition Partnership VIEs as the majority of the variable interests are expected to
accrue to the other non-affiliated investors. The Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary for two Acquisition Partnership VIEs in which the Company owns a majority voting interest.
The investors and third-party creditors, including FirstCity, generally have recourse only to the extent of the assets held by the Acquisition Partnership VIEs. Certain third-party creditors have
recourse to FirstCity where we provide a guaranty to the Acquisition Partnership VIE. The Company does not generally provide financial support to any Acquisition Partnership VIE beyond that which is
contractually required.

Operating Entity VIEsThe Company has significant variable interests with various commercial enterprise entities
(attributable primarily to certain equity and debt investments made by FirstCity Denverour Special Situations Platform business). FirstCity provided financing in the form of debt and/or
equity to help finance the activities of the Operating Entity VIEs. These Operating Entities are VIEs because generally they do not have sufficient equity to finance their activities without
additional subordinated financial support. The voting interests for all but one of the Operating Entity VIEs are either wholly-owned or majority-owned by non-affiliated investors, and the
Company is not the primary beneficiary of these minority-owned Operating Entity VIEs as the majority of the variable interests are expected to accrue to other non-affiliated investors. The
Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary for one Operating Entity VIE in which the Company owns a majority voting interest. The investors and creditors, including FirstCity, generally have
recourse only to the extent of the assets held

115

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

19. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

by
the Operating Entity VIEs. The Company does not generally provide financial support to any Operating Entity VIE beyond that which is contractually required.

The
following table displays the carrying amount and classification of assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2009. We record third-party ownership in
these consolidated VIEs in "Noncontrolling interests" in our consolidated balance sheet.

Acquisition
Partnership VIEs

Operating
Entity VIEs(Dollars in thousands)Cash

$
13,860

$
1,324Portfolio Assets, net


48,993


Other assets


11


8,632Total assets of consolidated VIEs

$
62,864

$
9,956Total other liabilities of consolidated VIEs

$
844

$
6,069


The
following table summarizes the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities and the maximum loss exposure as of December 31, 2009 related to the Company's variable interests
in non-consolidated VIEs. The Company does not have any consolidated VIEs for which it holds a minority voting interest in the entity.

Assets on FirstCity's
Consolidated
Balance SheetFirstCity's
Maximum
Exposure
to Loss(1)Type of VIE

Loans
Receivable

Equity
Investment(Dollars in thousands)Acquisition Partnership VIEs

$
2,179

$
18,604

$
21,862Operating Entity VIEs


16,332


1,110


17,442Net assets acquired

$
18,511

$
19,714

$
39,304


(1)Includes
maximum exposure to loss attributable to FirstCity's debt guarantees provided for certain Acquisition Partnership VIEs.


116

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

20. Other Related Party Transactions

The Company has contracted with the Acquisition Partnerships and certain other related parties as a third-party loan servicer. Servicing fees and due diligence fees (included in other
income) derived from these affiliates approximated $8.2 million in 2009 and $9.9 million in 2008.

FirstCity
Servicing Corporation ("FCSC"), a wholly-owned affiliate of the Company, and MCS et Associates ("MCS"), an equity-method investee of the Company in which FCSC has an 11.89%
ownership interest, are parties to certain agreements to which FCSC provides consultation services and personnel to be employed by MCS to assist in developing and managing due diligence and servicing
systems. Pursuant to these agreements, MCS provides the supplied personnel with compensation, tax equalization payments, housing allowances, transportation allowance, and tax preparation. MCS also
pays consulting fees to FCSC and reimburses FCSC for travel, hotel, airfare, and meal expenses incurred related to the provision of the services. FirstCity recorded fees from MCS in other income of
$0.4 million in 2009 and 2008 each.

In
2008, through a series of related-party transactions, FC Acquisitions SRL de CV ("FC Acquisitions"), a majority-owned Mexican affiliate of FirstCity, acquired a loan portfolio in
Mexico. The final funding for this transaction resulted in a note payable to MCS Trust SA de CV ("MCS Trust") by FC Acquisitions, in addition to a note receivable from MCS Trust held by BMX
Holding III LLC ("BMX Holding III"), a majority-owned affiliate of FirstCity. The accounts of MCS Trust are consolidated by BMX Holding II, an equity-method investee of
FirstCity (FirstCity has an 8.0% ownership interest in BMX Holding II). All intercompany transfers approximated $8.7 million, and both notes carry an interest rate of 20.0%. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the note receivable held by BMX Holding III had a carrying amount of $7.8 million and $8.7 million, respectively (reported in "Loans
receivableaffiliates" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet), and accrued interest of $2.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively (reported in "Other assets, net" on
the Company's consolidated balance sheet). At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the note payable to MCS Trust had a carrying amount of $7.8 million and $8.7 million, respectively
(reported in "Notes payable to affiliate" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet), and accrued interest of $2.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively (reported in "Other
liabilities" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet). The terms and carrying amount of the note payable to MCS Trust are summarized in Note 8. Should the note payable be forgiven at some
future date, the corresponding note receivable would be forgiven as well.

The
Company owns 80% of FirstCity Denvera special situations investment platform that was formed for the purpose of investing primarily in middle-market private companies
through flexible capital structuring arrangements. The other 20% interest in FirstCity Denver is owned by Crestone Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company that is owned by Richard
Horrigan and Stephen Schmeltekopf. Mr. Horrigan, President of FirstCity Denver, and Mr. Schmeltekopf, Senior Vice President of FirstCity Denver, are also employees of FirstCity Denver
and have employment contracts with FirstCity Denver.

21. Commitments and Contingencies



FirstCity and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates (including Acquisition Partnerships) are involved in various claims and legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In view of

117

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

the
inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of pending legal actions and proceedings, the Company cannot state with certainty the eventual outcome of any such proceedings. Based on current
knowledge, management does not believe that liabilities, if any, arising from any single ordinary course proceeding will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition,
operations, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.



On January 19, 2005, Prudential Financial, Inc. ("Prudential") filed a petition in interpleader seeking to interplead
321,211 shares of Prudential common stock and any associated dividends arising from the demutualization of Prudential in December 2000. The shares of Prudential common stock related to group
annuity contracts purchased by First-City National Bank of Houston, as trustee of the First City Bancorporation Employee Retirement Trust (the "Trust") to fund obligations to participants
in the First City Bancorporation Employee Retirement Plan
(the "Plan") in connection with termination of the Plan and the Trust in 1987. FirstCity, FCLT Loans Asset Corp. ("FCLT"), an alleged assignee of the FirstCity Liquidating Trust,
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association ("JP Morgan"), and First-City National Bank of Houston as trustee of the Trust were made defendants in the suit as claimants to the
Prudential common stock and dividends. An agreed order dated January 27, 2005, was entered by the Court providing that the Prudential common stock be transferred to JP Morgan as record
owner and that JP Morgan sell the stock. The January 27, 2005 order also provided that the proceeds from the sale be held by JP Morgan pending resolution, by agreement or court
order, of all conflicting claims to the proceeds. JP Morgan advised that the Prudential common stock was sold on January 28, 2005 for total proceeds of approximately
$17.5 million. JP Morgan also received funds in the amount of approximately $489,000, which were dividend payments related to the Prudential common stock. JP Morgan filed a third
party action naming Timothy J. Blair as a third party defendant with an alleged interest in the demutualization proceeds. On October 1, 2005, the court certified a class represented by
Mr. Blair.

Following
various court rulings and mediation proceedings, on September 25, 2009, FirstCity, FCLT and Mr. Blair, individually and as representative of a class of former
employee beneficiaries, entered into an Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement, subject to court approval, which provided for the settlement of the pending lawsuit related to the ownership of
demutualization proceeds from the sale of Prudential stock and dividends interpled by Prudential. The settlement provided for each party to receive one-third of the demutualization
proceeds, which totaled approximately $18.6 million at the time of settlement, net of approximately $0.3 million that JP Morgan will retain to pay fees, expenses and tax payments.
On December 22, 2009, the parties reached final settlement and FirstCity received approximately $6.1 million as its share of the settlement proceeds. The final settlement is
non-appealable, and each party released the other parties from all claims related to the lawsuit.



On March 20, 2007, Superior Funding, Inc., Wave Tec Pools, Inc. and Nations Pool Supply, Inc. (collectively
"Plaintiffs") filed a First Amended Petition adding FH Partners (formerly FH Partners, L.P.) and FirstCity Servicing Corporation, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, and FirstCity
Financial Corporation as defendants in a suit filed by Plaintiffs against State Bank and Cole

118

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Harmonson.
FirstCity Financial Corporation was served with Plaintiff's Notice of Nonsuit Without Prejudice in the suit on April 25, 2007. Grandview Homes, Inc. was subsequently added as
an additional plaintiff. The Plaintiffs' claims relate to alleged breaches by FH Partners and FirstCity Servicing Corporation in connection with a loan agreement related to a loan from State Bank to
Plaintiffs that was purchased by FH Partners from State Bank on December 22, 2006. The Plaintiffs allege that they entered into a loan or line of credit with State Bank and that due to an error
by State Bank the Plaintiffs borrowed more on the line of credit than was allowed under the borrowing base which State Bank agreed would be cured if the Plaintiffs pledged additional property to
secure the loans. Plaintiffs
allege that State Bank, and subsequently FH Partners, have refused to honor the agreement by State Bank concerning the pledge of the additional property. Plaintiffs allege that they have sustained
actual damages of $165 million as a result of the joint actions of State Bank, Cole Harmonson, FH Partners and FirstCity Servicing Corporation. The Plaintiffs additionally seek recovery of
statutory penalties and attorney's fees. Plaintiffs additionally assert that FH Partners and FirstCity were aware of State Bank's wrongful conduct and continued to engage in it and that the Plaintiffs
were obligated to mitigate their damages. On October 9, 2007, FH Partners filed a collection suit against the Plaintiffs and guarantors to recover the balance of the debt owed under the loans
and to realize upon the security interests securing the loans. On September 25, 2009, the Plaintiffs filed a non-suit without prejudice of FH Partners and FirstCity Servicing
Corporation in the original suit filed against State Bank and other parties. The claims in the original suit have been raised as counterclaims in the collection suit initiated by FH Partners. Trial
has been set in the collection suit for August 2, 2010. FirstCity does not have sufficient information to estimate any potential liability or probability of liability, but is unaware of any
factual or legal basis for liability. Given the magnitude of the Plaintiffs' wrongdoing and the lack of any evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of FirstCity or FH Partners, management believes that
an unfavorable outcome in the lender liability suit seems remote.



On September 21, 2004, FirstCity, FirstCity Consumer Corporation ("Consumer Corp."), FirstCity Funding LP
("Funding LP") and FirstCity Funding GP ("Funding GP") entered into the a Securities Purchase Agreement to sell a 31% beneficial ownership interest in Drive and its general
partner, Drive GP LLC, to IFA-GP, IFA-LP and MG-LP (the "2004 Securities Purchase Agreement"). In the 2004 Securities Purchase Agreement, FirstCity,
Consumer Corp., Funding LP and Funding GP made various representations and warranties concerning (i) their respective organizations, (ii) their power and authority to enter
into the 2004 Securities Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein, (iii) the ownership of the limited partnership interests in Drive by Funding LP, (iv) the
ownership of membership interests in Drive-GP by Consumer Corp., and (iv) the capital structure of Funding LP. FirstCity, Consumer Corp., Funding LP and
Funding GP also agreed to indemnify BoS(USA), IFA-GP, IFA-LP and MG-LP from damages resulting from a breach of any representation or warranty contained in
the 2004 Securities Purchase Agreement or otherwise made by FirstCity, Consumer Corp. or Funding LP in connection with the transaction. The indemnity obligations under the 2004 Securities
Purchase Agreement survive for a maximum period of five (5) years from November 1, 2004. Neither FirstCity, Consumer Corp., Funding LP, nor Funding GP is required to make
any payments as a result of the indemnity provided under the 2004 Securities Purchase Agreement until the aggregate amount payable exceeds $250,000, and then only for the amount in

119

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

excess
of $250,000 in the aggregate; however certain representations and warranties are not subject to this $250,000 threshold. Under terms of the agreement, the indemnity obligation period expired on
November 1, 2009. No losses were incurred by FirstCity, Consumer Corp., Funding LP or Funding GP during the term of this indemnity obligation agreement.

On
August 8, 2006, an Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement was entered into by and among Bidmex Holding LLC ("Bidmex Holding"), as buyer, and Strategic Mexican Investment
Partners L.P. ("SMIP"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, and Cargill Financial Services International Inc. ("CFSI"), (collectively, the "Sellers"), as seller, and eleven U.S.
limited liability companies ("LLCs") which invested in Mexican portfolio acquisition entities ("SRLs") and the AIG entities as additional parties. In the Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, the
Sellers and the LLCs made various representations and warranties concerning (i) the existence and ownership of the LLCs and the related SRLs, (ii) the assets and liabilities of the LLCs,
(iii) taxes related to periods prior to August 8, 2006, and (iv) the operations of the LLCs and SRLs. The Sellers agreed to indemnify Bidmex Holding and AIG Entities from damages
resulting from a breach of any representation or warranty contained in the Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement on a several and not joint basis according to their respective ownership percentages in
each LLC as to any matter related to a particular LLC, or on the basis of 80% to CFSI and 20% to SMIP as to any matter that could not be identified to a particular LLC. The indemnity obligation under
the Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement survives for a period of the statute of limitations for matters related to taxes, existence and authority, capitalization and good standing of the LLCs and
SRLs and for a period of two years from August 8, 2006, the closing date with respect to all other representations and warranties. The Sellers are not required to make any payments as a result
of the indemnity provisions of the Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement until the aggregate amount payable under that agreement and the Asset Purchase Agreement exceeds $250,000; however, claims
related to taxes and fraud are not subject to this $250,000 threshold. The Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement limits the liability of the Sellers for indemnifiable losses under the Interest Purchase
and Sale Agreement and the Asset Purchase Agreement to the Aggregate Purchase Price (without duplication of amounts recovered pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement). At this time,
management does not believe that this potential obligation will have a material adverse impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Also
on August 8, 2006, Bidmex Holding entered into an Agreement for the Onerous Transfer of Loans and Litigious Rights (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") between and among
Residencial Oeste S. de R.L. de C.V., as seller (the "Asset Seller"), an affiliate of CFSI and SMIP, Residencial Oeste 2 S. de R.L. de C.V., as
purchaser (the "Asset Purchaser"), and CFSI, SMIP, and Bidmex Acquisition LLC, the parent of the Asset Purchaser, as additional parties. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides for the sale of
the loan portfolio owned by the Seller to the Purchaser for a purchase price of $10.1 million on the closing date, which purchase price is part of the Aggregate Purchase Price. In the Asset
Purchase Agreement, the Asset Seller and the Sellers made various representations and warranties concerning (i) the existence and ownership of the Seller, (ii) the ownership of the loan
portfolio, (iii) taxes related to periods arising prior to the closing date, and (iv) the existence of the loans comprising the loan portfolio and other matters related to the loan
portfolio. The Asset Seller agreed to indemnify the Asset Purchaser from damages resulting from a breach of any representation or warranty. The indemnity obligation under the Asset Purchase

120

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Agreement
survives for a period of the statute of limitations for matters related to existence and ownership of the Seller, ownership of the loans, and taxes for periods prior to August 8,
2006, and for a period of two years from August 8, 2006, with respect to all other representations and warranties. The Seller is not required to make any payments as a result of the indemnity
provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement until the aggregate amount payable under that Agreement exceeds $25,000; however, claims related to taxes and fraud are not subject to this $25,000
threshold. The Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement limits the liability of the Sellers for indemnifiable losses under the Asset
Purchase Agreement to the Aggregate Purchase Price. At this time, management does not believe that this potential obligation will have a material adverse impact on the Company's consolidated results
of operations, financial position or liquidity.



During the period from December 1998 to March 2005, FirstCity Mexico Inc. and SMIP, each wholly-owned subsidiaries
of FirstCity, and Cargill Financial Services International Inc. ("CFSI") and, in some instances, other investors, acquired 12 residential and commercial non-performing loan
portfolios from financial institutions in Mexico (the "Mexican Portfolios"). Each portfolio was acquired by a Mexican limited liability company (each a "Mexican SRL") that was owned by
a Delaware limited liability company formed by each investor group. On August 8, 2006, SMIP and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., American General Life Insurance Company
and American General Life and Accident Insurance Company, affiliates of AIG Global Asset Management Holdings Corp. (collectively the "AIG Entities") formed Bidmex Holding for the purpose of acquiring
the Mexican Portfolios by purchasing the interests of Cargill and SMIP in eleven of the Mexican limited liability companies (the "LLCs") and purchasing the loan portfolio of one of the Mexican limited
liability companies (the "Purchased Portfolio") for an aggregate purchase price of U.S. $119.3 million as of that date (the "Aggregate Purchase Price"). SMIP acquired 15% of the membership
interests in Bidmex Holding. A 9% interest acquired by SMIP is of equivalent standing to membership interests held by the AIG affiliates representing 85% of the membership interests. The remaining 6%
membership interest acquired by SMIP is subordinate to the other owners of interests in Bidmex Holding, who will receive the return of and a return on their contribution equivalent to an 9% internal
rate of return with respect to their interests prior to SMIP receiving the return of and a return on its capital contribution equivalent to a 9% internal rate of return with respect to its 6%
interest. At December 31, 2009, the carrying value of SMIP's membership interests in Bidmex Holding that is included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet approximated
$11.9 million ($5.5 million for the 9% membership interest and $6.4 million for the 6% membership interest).



In connection with the Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, Recuperación de Carteras Mexicanas,
S. de R.L. de C.V., as optionor ("RCM"), an affiliate of SMIP and CFSI, granted a put option to Bidmex Holding LLC, as optionee, pursuant to the terms of a Put Option
Agreement dated August 8, 2006 by and among RCM, Bidmex Holding LLC, Bidmex 6 LLC (the parent entity of RCM), CFSI and SMIP. RCM granted a put option to Bidmex Holding LLC
related to the purchase of any loan of Solución de Activos Residenciales, S. de R.L. de C.V. or Solución de Activos Comerciales,
S. de R.L. de C.V., each a Mexican SRL, pursuant to certain terms and conditions. Pursuant to the put

121

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

option
agreement, Bidmex Holding LLC delivered a notice to exercise the put option on March 31, 2008 for qualifying loans with a purchase price of approximately $635,000. In
January 2009, RCM, Bidmex Holding LLC, Bidmex 6 LLC, CFSI and SMIP entered into an agreement to terminate the put option agreement. Under terms of the termination
agreement, Residencial Oeste, S. de R.L. de C.V., an affiliate of SMIP and CFSI, purchased certain loans for approximately 1.4 million Mexican pesos (approximately $99,000) from
Bidmex Holding LLC in settlement of the put option claims and termination of the put option agreement.

Financial
Security Assurance Inc. ("FSA"), in its capacity as certificate insurer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, relating to the FirstCity Capital Home Equity Loan
Trust 1998-2 (the "Trust"), dated as of November 1, 1998 by and among FC Capital Corp., in its capacities as seller and master servicer, and The Bank of New York, in its capacity as
trustee, made demand on FC Capital Corp. to repurchase certain loans that were subject to repurchase due to fraud of third parties in connection with the origination of the loans. FC Capital Corp.
agreed to provide a letter of credit in the amount of the repurchase price for the loans in lieu of being required to purchase the loans from the Trust. FirstCity has obtained and delivered to FSA,
for the benefit of FC Capital Corp., an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $0.5 million from the Bank of Scotland. Pursuant to the agreement with FSA, FC Capital Corp. has the option
to purchase the loans for $0.5 million prior to a call under the letter of credit. In July 2009, FirstCity funded this $0.5 million letter of credit pursuant to a demand made by
FSA as a result of the line of credit issuer failing to maintain the long-term ratings as required under the agreement.



Fondo de Inversion Privado NPL Fund One ("PIF1"), an equity-method investment of FirstCity, has a credit facility with Banco Santander
Chile, S.A. with an unpaid principal balance of $10.5 million at December 31, 2009. PIF1 uses the credit facility to finance the purchases of
loan portfolios. Pursuant to terms of the credit facility, FirstCity was required to provide a stand-by letter of credit from Bank of Scotland that would satisfy the current loan balance
upon demand. At December 31, 2009, FirstCity had a letter of credit in the amount of $10.75 million from Bank of Scotland under the terms of FirstCity's revolving acquisition facility
with Bank of Scotland, with Banco Santander Chile, S.A. as the letter of credit beneficiary. In the event that a demand is made under the $10.75 million letter of credit, FirstCity would
be required to reimburse Bank of Scotland by making payment to Bank of Scotland for all amounts disbursed or to be disbursed by Bank of Scotland under the letter of credit.

On
November 29, 2006, FirstCity Mexico SA de CV, a Mexican affiliate of FirstCity, entered into a loan agreement with Banco Santander, S.A. that allows loans to be
made in Mexican pesos. At December 31, 2009, the Company had 142,240,000 in Mexican peso-denominated debt, which was equivalent to $11.0 million U.S. dollars. The proceeds
were used to pay down the acquisition facility with the Bank of Scotland. Pursuant to the terms of the credit facility, FirstCity Mexico SA de CV was required to provide a stand-by
letter of credit from Bank of Scotland that would satisfy the loan balance upon demand. At December 31, 2009, FirstCity had a letter of credit in the amount of $12.6 million from Bank of
Scotland under the terms of FirstCity's revolving acquisition facility with Bank of Scotland. In the event that a demand is made under the $12.6 million letter of credit, FirstCity

122

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

is
required to reimburse Bank of Scotland by making payment to Bank of Scotland for all amounts disbursed or to be disbursed by Bank of Scotland under the letter of credit.

ABL,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, has a $25.0 million revolving loan facility with WFCF (see Note 2). The obligations under this facility are secured by
substantially all of the assets of ABL, and FirstCity provides WFCF with an unconditional guaranty on ABL's obligations under the loan facility up to a maximum of $5.0 million
plus enforcement cost. At December 31, 2009, the balance of this loan facility was $10.7 million.

FirstCity
Commercial Corp. ("FirstCity Commercial"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstCity, provides guarantees to various financial institutions for financing associated investments
and operations of certain Acquisition Partnerships. The underlying financing arrangements of these Acquisitions Partnerships have various maturities ranging from July 2010 to
September 2012, and are secured primarily by certain real estate properties held by the Acquisition Partnerships. At December 31, 2009, FirstCity Commercial's maximum commitments under
these guaranty arrangements totaled $1.6 million, and the total unpaid debt obligations of these Acquisition Partnerships attributed to FirstCity Commercial's underlying guaranty approximated
$1.5 million.



The Company generally retains environmental consultants to conduct or update environmental assessments in connection with the Company's
foreclosed and acquired real estate properties. These environmental assessments have not revealed environmental conditions that the Company believes will have a material adverse effect on its
business, assets, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, and the Company is not otherwise aware of environmental conditions with respect to properties that the Company believes would
have such a material adverse effect. However, from time to time, environmental conditions at the Company's properties have required and may in the future require environmental testing and/or
regulatory filings, as well as remedial action. Liabilities for future remediation costs are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Other than for assessments, the timing and magnitude of these accruals generally are based on the completion of investigations or other studies or a commitment to a formal plan
of action.



At December 31, 2009, the estimated settlement value of the Company's non-controlling interests in consolidated
limited-life subsidiaries approximated $2.5 million. The Company's carrying value of the non-controlling interests recognized on the consolidated balance sheet related
to these limited-life subsidiaries approximated $0.8 million at December 31, 2009.



We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain of our
entities are under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years. We regularly assess the potential outcome of current and future examinations in each of the taxing
jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. We have only

123

---



Table of Contents

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

21. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

recorded
financial statement benefits for tax positions which we believe reflect the "more-likely-than-not" criteria incorporated in the FASB's authoritative guidance on
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and we have established income tax reserves in
accordance with this authoritative guidance where necessary. Once a financial statement benefit for a tax position is recorded or a tax reserve is established, we adjust it only when there is more
information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change. While we believe that the amount of the recorded financial statement benefits and tax reserves reflect the
more-likely-than-not criteria, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may result in a reduction to the tax benefits previously recorded on
the financial statements or may exceed the current income tax reserves in amounts that could be material.

22. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following are summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:

2009

2008First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)Revenues

$
15,681

$
20,661

$
18,731

$
24,714

$
9,504

$
11,489

$
12,689

$
11,514Expenses


14,280


13,897


14,310


18,936


15,759


20,875


16,434


19,068Equity in earnings of investments


(146
)

1,198


421


(1,737
)

2,840


3,008


2,170


(7,790
)Gain on business combinations





1,455





811











Income from lawsuit settlement











6,119











Income tax expense (benefit)


263


440


1,254


225


191


98


(44
)

19,959Net earnings


992


8,977


3,588


10,746


(3,606
)

(6,476
)

(1,531
)

(35,303
)Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests


348


1,231


1,588


2,392


(22
)

53


224


(496
)Net earnings (loss) to common stockholders


644


7,746


2,000


8,354


(3,584
)

(6,529
)

(1,755
)

(34,807
)Earnings (loss) from continuing operations per common shareBasic

$
0.07

$
0.79

$
0.20

$
0.84

$
(0.34
)
$
(0.63
)
$
(0.17
)
$
(3.53
)Diluted

$
0.07

$
0.76

$
0.19

$
0.80

$
(0.34
)
$
(0.63
)
$
(0.17
)
$
(3.53
)


124

---



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
FirstCity Financial Corporation:

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FirstCity Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FirstCity Financial Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009,
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), FirstCity Financial Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal ControlIntegrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 31, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

KPMG LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 31, 2010

125

---



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
FirstCity Financial Corporation:

We
have audited FirstCity Financial Corporation's (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). FirstCity
Financial Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In
our opinion FirstCity Financial Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established inInternal ControlIntegrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of FirstCity Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009, and our report dated March 31, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 31, 2010

126

---





Table of Contents

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls
and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

We
conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of
December 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

Under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal ControlIntegrated Frameworkissued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ("COSO") of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management has determined that, as of December 31, 2009, its internal control over financial
reporting was effective based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2009, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.There was no change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information.

The Company held its annual meeting of stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") on November 13, 2009. The following items for
business were considered at the Annual Meeting.

127

---



Table of Contents

(a)   Election of Directors

The following individuals were elected as directors to serve as members of the Company's Board of Directors until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until
their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. The number of votes cast for each nominee was as follows:

Nominee

Votes For

Votes WithheldRichard E. Bean


8,481,973


167,197C. Ivan Wilson


8,490,779


158,391James T. Sartain


8,478,288


170,882Dane Fulmer


8,490,779


158,391Robert E. Garrison II


8,455,630


193,540D. Michael Hunter


8,484,529


164,641F. Clayton Miller


8,481,973


167,197


(b)   Approval of Stock Option and Award Plan

A proposal to approve the Company's 2010 Stock Option and Award Plan was approved by the stockholders. The number of votes cast for or against and the number of
abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to this proposal is as follows: 4,523,315 votes for; 1,806,999 votes against; 501,640 abstentions; and 1,817,216 broker non-votes.

(c)   Ratification of Appointment of Auditors

A proposal to ratify the Board of Directors' appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors for 2009 was approved by the stockholders. The
number of votes cast for or against and the number of abstentions with respect to this proposal is as follows: 8,602,276 votes for; 18,651 votes against; and 28,243 abstentions.

128

---



Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by Item 10 of Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed
of (i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K or (ii) the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed within 120 days after the Company's year end for the year covered by this report.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 11 of Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed
of (i) an amendment to this annual report on
Form 10-K or (ii) the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within 120 days after the Company's year
end for the year covered by this report.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by Item 12 of Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed
of (i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K or (ii) the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed within 120 days after the Company's year end for the year covered by this report.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 13 of Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed
of (i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K or (ii) the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed within 120 days after the Company's year end for the year covered by this report.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 14 of Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed
of (i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K or (ii) the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed within 120 days after the Company's year end for the year covered by this report.

129

---





Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.



1.Financial Statements

The
consolidated financial statements of FirstCity are incorporated herein by reference to Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

2.Financial Statement Schedules

Financial
statement schedules have been omitted because the information is either not required, not applicable, or is included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data."

3.Exhibits

Exhibit
Number



Description of Exhibit2.1



Joint Plan of Reorganization by First City Bancorporation of Texas, Inc., Official Committee of Equity Security Holders and J-Hawk Corporation, with the Participation of Cargill Financial Services Corporation, Under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 392-39474-HCA-11 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 3, 1995 filed with the Commission on
July 18, 1995)2.2



Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 3, 1995, by and between First City Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. and J-Hawk Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 3, 1995 filed with the Commission on July 18, 1995)3.1



Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 3, 1995 filed with the Commission
on July 18, 1995)3.2



Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2005 filed with the Commission on
December 30, 2005)10.4



Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of September 21, 2004 by and among FirstCity Financial Corporation and certain affiliates of FirstCity and IFA Drive GP Holdings LLC, IFA Drive LP
Holdings LLC, Drive Management LP and certain affiliates of those persons. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated September 27, 2004)10.5



Revolving Credit Agreement, dated November 12, 2004, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 15, 2004)10.6



1995 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A of the Company's Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement, dated March 27, 1996)10.7



1996 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit C of the Company's Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement, dated March 27, 1996)10.8



2004 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Company's Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement, dated October 21, 2003)


130

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number



Description of Exhibit10.9



Revolving Credit Agreement, dated August 26, 2005, among FH Partners, L.P., as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated September 1, 2005)10.10



Guaranty Agreement, dated August 26, 2005, executed by FirstCity Financial Corporation, FirstCity Commercial Corporation, FirstCity Europe Corporation, FirstCity Holdings Corporation, FirstCity International
Corporation, FirstCity Mexico, Inc., and FirstCity Servicing Corporation for the benefit of Bank of Scotland, as agent, and lenders (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K dated September 1,
2005)10.12



Asset Purchase Agreement, dated June 30, 2006, by and among FirstCity Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries, FirstCity Business Lending Corporation and American Business Lending, Inc.; and AMRESCO SBA
Holdings, Inc. and NCS I, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 7, 2006)10.13



2006 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Company's Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement, dated June 26, 2006)10.14



Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 8, 2006, by and among Bidmex Holding, LLC, and Strategic Mexican Investment Partners, L.P. and Cargill Financial Services International, Inc. and
certain other parties (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 9, 2006)10.15



Put Option Agreement dated August 8, 2006, by and among Bidmex Holding, LLC, Recuperacion de Carteras Mexicanas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Bidmex 6, LLC, Strategic Mexican Investment Partners 2, L.P. and
Cargill Financial Services International, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 9, 2006)10.16



Guarantee dated August 8, 2006, executed by FirstCity Financial Corporation for the benefit of Bidmex Holding, LLC, Residencial Oeste 2 S. de R.L. de C.V., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg,
P.A., American General Life Insurance Company, and American General Life and Accident Insurance Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 9, 2006)10.17



Amendment No. 4 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated November 7, 2006)10.18



Management Employment Contract dated November 30, 2006, between FirstCity Business Lending Corporation, American Business Lending, Inc., and Charles P. Bell, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 7, 2006)10.20



Amendment No. 5 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2006, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 20, 2006)


131

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number



Description of Exhibit10.21



Loan Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2006 by and between American Business Lending, Inc., as Borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as lender (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
the Company's Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006)10.22



Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2007, by and between American Business Lending, Inc., as Borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as lender (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company's Form 10-K dated July 24, 2007)10.23



Amendment No. 9 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2007, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated August 10, 2007)10.24



Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, among FH Partners, L.P., as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated August 10, 2007)10.25



Amendment No. 2 to Loan Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2007, by and between American Business Lending, Inc., as Borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as lender (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated August 3, 2007)10.26



Amendment No. 10 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of August 22, 2007, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated August 28, 2007)10.27



Amendment No. 3 and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated August 22, 2007, among FH Partners, L.L.C., as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K dated August 28, 2007)10.28



Subordinated Delayed Draw Credit Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2007, among FirstCity Financial Corporation, as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and BoS(USA), Inc., as agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated September 10, 2007)10.34



Amendment and Consent No. 25 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2008, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as
Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2008)10.35



Amendment and Consent No. 12 to Subordinated Delayed Draw Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2008, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and
BoS(USA), Inc., as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2008)10.36



Amendment and Consent No. 6 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2008, among FH Partners, LLC, as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2008)


132

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number



Description of Exhibit10.37



Conditional Waiver Agreement Regarding Event of Default dated effective September 30, 2008, between American Business Lending, Inc., an affiliate of FirstCity, as borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as
lender (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 10, 2008)10.38



Conditional Waiver Under Loan Agreement dated November 10, 2008, between American Business Lending, Inc., an affiliate of FirstCity, as borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as lender (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.41 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 10, 2008)10.39



Amendment and Consent No. 27 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2008, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland,
as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008)10.40



Amendment and Consent No. 14 to Subordinated Delayed Draw Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2008, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and
BoS(USA), Inc., as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008)10.41



Amendment and Consent No. 7 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2008, among FH Partners, LLC, as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland, as Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008)10.42



Mediator's Proposal, dated November 20, 2008, among Michael S. Wilk, as mediator appointed by the Court of Appeals for the First District for the State of Texas, and agreed to by the FCLT Loans Asset Corporation,
FirstCity Financial Corporation, Timothy J. Blair, Class Representative of former employees of FirstCity Bancorporation of Texas, Inc., and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
the Company's Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008)10.43



Conditional Waiver Agreement Regarding Event of Default, dated and effective as of December 31, 2008, between American Business Lending, Inc., an affiliate of FirstCity, as borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill,
 Inc., as lender (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated February 4, 2009)10.44



Amendment No. 3 to Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2009, by and between American Business Lending, Inc., as Borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as Lender (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.44 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated May 12, 2009)10.45



Amended and Restated General Continuing Limited Guaranty, dated February 18, 2009, by FirstCity Financial Corporation, as Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as Lender (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.45 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated May 12, 2009)10.46



Separation Agreement, Release and Amendment to Award Agreements dated June 4, 2009, by and between Richard J. Vander Woude, FirstCity Servicing Corporation and FirstCity Financial Corporation (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated June 5, 2009)


133

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number



Description of Exhibit10.47



Retainer Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, by and between Richard J. Vander Woude, FirstCity Servicing Corporation and FirstCity Financial Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Company's Form 8-K dated June 5, 2009)10.48



Recommendation of Compensation Committee for a 2009 bonus plan for certain executive officers and two other employees (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated August 19,
2009)10.49



Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement, dated September 25, 2009, between FCLT Loans Asset Corporation, FirstCity Financial Corporation, and Timothy J. Blair, Class Representative of former employee
beneficiaries (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated September 30, 2009)10.50



2010 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Company's Schedule 14A, Definitive Proxy Statement, dated October 1, 2009, as amended by supplemental
Schedule 14A, Definitive Additional Materials, dated November 5, 2009)10.51



Amendment No. 4 to Loan Agreement, dated November 2, 2009, by and between American Business Lending, Inc., as Borrower, and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as Lender (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated November 10, 2009)10.52



Press release dated December 22, 2009, pursuant to Item 7.01, announcing the Company's receipt of final settlement proceeds pursuant to the Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement described in its release
dated September 30, 2009 and in Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009)10.53



Approval by the Company's Board of Directors of the Compensation Committee's recommendation for a 2010 bonus plan for certain executive officers of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
Form 8-K dated February 16, 2010)10.54



Amendment and Consent No. 33 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2010, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of
Scotland plc, as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated March 29, 2010)10.55



Amendment and Consent No. 20 to Subordinated Delayed Draw Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2010, among FirstCity Financial Corporation as Borrower and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and
BoS(USA), Inc., as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated March 29, 2010)10.56



Amendment and Consent No. 9 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2010, among FH Partners LLC, as Borrower, and the Lenders named therein, as Lenders, and Bank of Scotland plc, as
Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated March 29, 2010)21.1*



Subsidiaries of the Registrant23.1*



Consent of KPMG LLP31.1*



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


134

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number



Description of Exhibit31.2*



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1*



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.2*



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*Filed
herewith.


135

---





Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ JAMES T. SARTAIN James T. Sartain President and Chief Executive Officer


March 31,
2010

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date/s/ RICHARD E. BEAN Richard E. Bean

Chairman of the Board and Director

March 31, 2010/s/ JAMES T. SARTAIN James T. Sartain

President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

March 31, 2010/s/ J. BRYAN BAKER J. Bryan Baker

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March 31, 2010/s/ C. IVAN WILSON C. Ivan Wilson

Vice Chairman of the Board and Director

March 31, 2010/s/ DANE FULMER Dane Fulmer

Director

March 31, 2010/s/ ROBERT E. GARRISON, II Robert E. Garrison, II

Director

March 31, 2010/s/ D. MICHAEL HUNTER D. Michael Hunter

Director

March 31, 2010/s/ F. CLAY MILLER F. Clay Miller

Director

March 31, 2010


136

---