alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Francis Bruecher, *Appellant, v.*The Village of Port Chester, *Respondent.*

Judgment reversed,' with costs. Opinion by

Brady, J.,

and by Davis, P. J., dissenting.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interlink Electronics, Inc.: 

 

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 033-93066, 333-39371, 333-53870 and 333-107174) on FormS-8 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-112034) on Form S-3 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our reports dated March 25, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Interlink Electronics, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting, which included an adverse opinion as to the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 30, 2005
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1451

To provide authority for the extension of nondiscriminatory (most-favorednation) trade treatment to Cambodia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself and Mr. HAMILTON) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide authority for the extension of nondiscriminatory

(most-favored-nation) trade treatment to Cambodia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREAT4 MENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored7 nation treatment) applies to the products of Cambodia.

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—General Note 3(b)

9 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

10 is amended by striking ‘‘Kampuchea’’.
2

HR 1451 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 Section 1(a) and the amendment made by section

3 1(b) apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn

4 from warehouse for consumption when an agreement be5 tween the United States of America and the Kingdom of

6 Cambodia on trade relations and intellectual property

7 rights protection enters into force.

8 SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL AND PRESIDENTIAL REVIEW OF

9 HUMAN RIGHTS.

10 (a) If Congress mandates such action through legisla11 tion the President shall revoke most-favored-nation for

12 Cambodia, otherwise.

13 (b) The President of the United States may suspend

14 most-favored-nation treatment for Cambodia if they fail

15 to meet a standard set by the President.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Joshua Aldridge, 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

City of Warren, Colin McCabe, and 

Kimberly Teolis, in their official 

and individual capacities, 

Defendant(s).

________________________________/ 

Case No. 15-cv-12366 

Hon. Judith E. Levy 

Mag. Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22] 

 For the reasons stated on the record on January 12, 2016, 

defendants’ motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. 

Furthermore, and also for the reasons stated on the record, defendants 

may file a motion pursuant to Rule 11 by January 26, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 14, 2016 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS ECF No. 30, PageID.245 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s 

ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 14, 2016. 

s/Felicia M. Moses 

FELICIA M. MOSES 

Case Manager 

Case 5:15-cv-12366-JEL-EAS ECF No. 30, PageID.246 Filed 01/14/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,686
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             792
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,960
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     25,920
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,824
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,824
<LOANS>                                         80,682
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,923
<DEPOSITS>                                     131,303
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                912
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,147
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 140,923
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,007
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   240
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,589
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 865
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 865
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,724
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    483
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         483
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.68
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,815
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,566
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,638
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,638
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 37 38 39 40 41 

## ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/04 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
# C_2014009EN.01001401.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Feldkirch — Austria) — Armin Maletic, Marianne Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH, TUI Österreich GmbH

(Case C-478/12) (1)

1

(Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 16(1) - Contract for travel concluded between a consumer domiciled in one Member State and a travel agency established in another Member State - Supplier of services used by the travel agency established in the Member State where the consumer is domiciled - Right of a consumer to bring an action against two undertakings before the court for the place of his domicile)

2014/C 9/20

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesgericht Feldkirch

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Armin Maletic, Marianne Maletic

Applicant:

Defendant: lastminute.com GmbH, TUI Österreich GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Landesgericht Feldkirch — Interpretation of Article 16(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Jurisdiction in respect of contracts entered into by consumers — All-inclusive travel contract concluded between a consumer and a company — Situation in which the company is established in a Member State other than that of the consumer and has recourse, for the purpose of performing that contract, to a company which is established in the Member State of the consumer — Whether the consumer is entitled to bring proceedings, before the court of his place of residence, against those two companies

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of ‘other party to the contract’ laid down in Article 16(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, that it also covers the contracting partner of the operator with which the consumer concluded that contract and which has its registered office in the Member State in which the consumer is domiciled.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 15, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,930
<INVENTORY>                                     55,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,236
<PP&E>                                         194,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,621
<BONDS>                                         37,089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,486
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   373,568
<SALES>                                        249,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               249,715
<CGS>                                          208,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending March 4, 2006

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK | * Branch       | Farmers & Merchants Bank, Timbreville, Virginia proposes to establish a branch at #1 East Luray Shopping Center, East Main Street, Luray, Virginia. | Newspaper:03/16/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 03/16/2006    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 9, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10440

Conference Calendar

 

TRACEY DEMARK GARRETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHUCK NORRIS, also known as Carlos Ray Norris; 

AARON NORRIS; BOB GORKIN; MORRIS BROTHERS; CLERANCE GILYARD,

ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CV-1566-D

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tracey Garrett, federal prisoner no. 31079-077, appeals the

dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A of

his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Garrett

alleged that actor Chuck Norris and numerous employees of the

television show “Walker, Texas Ranger” violated his civil rights

by acting as federal law enforcement officers, arresting and
No. 02-10440

-2-

harassing him on camera, and causing humiliating photographs of

him to be published in People magazine. 

Garrett’s action is time-barred and was properly dismissed

as frivolous. See Gonzales v. Wyatt, 157 F.3d 1016, 1019-20

(5th Cir. 1998). In addition, Garrett’s attempts to argue on

appeal for tolling the limitation period or beginning it at a

later date lack any arguable merit. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The district court’s dismissal and the dismissal of this

appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for the purposes of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383,

385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Garrett that once he

accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis

in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated

unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.
§ 42.13-1 Assumptions. ( a ) The regulations in this part are based on the assumption that the nature and stowage of the cargo, ballast, etc., are such as will secure sufficient stability of the vessel and avoid excessive structural stress.
( b ) The regulations in this part are also based on the assumption that, where there are other international requirements relating to stability or subdivision applicable to vessels, these requirements have been met.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10058, July 12, 1968]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<CIK>                     0000700721
<NAME>                    AMERICAN MEDICAL ALERT CORP.

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   981,019
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,089,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                             60,000
<INVENTORY>                                           1,869,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      5,350,380
<PP&E>                                                5,080,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       10,741,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   657,613
<BONDS>                                                 152,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 64,218
<OTHER-SE>                                            9,515,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         10,741,727
<SALES>                                                 158,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      4,455,682
<CGS>                                                   151,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,594,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        9,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         861,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                            371,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            490,072
<EPS-BASIC>                                               .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .08


</TABLE>
§ 46.01-1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the regulations in this part is to set forth uniform minimum requirements applicable to passenger vessels required to have subdivision load lines. These requirements deal with the following: ( 1 ) Load line requirements applicable before a passenger vessel will be marked with and certificated as to subdivision load lines.
( 2 ) Assigning, marking, and recording of subdivision load lines.
( 3 ) Administration of subdivision load lines.
( 4 ) Application of requirements to passenger vessels.
#### § 201.156 Requests for extension of time for filing briefs.

Requests for extension of time within which to file briefs shall conform to the requirements of § 201.53. Except for good cause shown, such requests shall be filed and served not later than five (5) days before the expiration of the time fixed for the filing of briefs.