alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 22, 2009

|Filer                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | * 3A5         | NB&T Financial Group, Inc., Wilmington, Ohio to acquire 100 percent of Community National Corporation, Franklin, Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire The Community National Bank, Frnaklin, Ohio pursuant to Section 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                 | Not available
|Federal Register:          | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2009 (October 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### John Voght & Co. *v.*James G. Ticknor.

Under ch. 188, sec. 22, Rev. Stats., the party giving notice to take depositions is liable to pay tho statute compensation for. the other party’s travel if no depositions are taken, although the party giving the notice acted in good faith, and expected to be able to procure the attendance of his witnesses, and used reasonable diligence to procure such attendance, and had no notice that they would not attend.

Under the same statute, “twenty-five cents amile'.for actual travel” each way, may he recovered.

Tins is an action on the case, founded upon section 22, page 486, of the Compiled Statutes. In a previous action between the same parties, now pending in this court, the defendant- gave the plaintiffs notice to take a deposition or depositions before a justice of the peace, at the office of one Mr. Trumble, in Jay, in the State of New York, on the 20th day of February, A. D. 1867, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon. It is admitted that the notice was properly made out and signed, and a copy thereof served upon the plaintiffs or their attorney, in accordance with the statute; that the attorney of the plaintiffs actually travelled four hundred miles, (i. e., two hundred miles each way,) to attend the taking of the deposition or depositions, and that the plaintiffs were not notified that the same would not be taken; and that defendant did not take any deposition or depositions at the time and place specified in the notice; that the counsel for plaintiffs appeared at the appointed time and place and waited one hour, or until 11 o’clock in the forenoon, for the depositions to be taken. It is also admitted that defendant acted in good faith in giving notice, and expected to be able to procure the attendance of his witnesses, and used reasonable diligence to procure such attendance, and had no notice that they would not attend; also, that the witnesses left their home for the purpose of giving their depositions agreeably to said notice, but after proceeding some fifteen miles, returned in consequence of the severity of the weather, and tlie illness of one of them, and did not appear on said 20th of February, at said. Trumble’s office.

*JMorris, Q. W. & JE. JD. Sand,*for plaintiffs.

*JBlaisdell*and *Hibbard,*for defendant.

Smith, J.

"If any party, after giving nance to the adverse party as aforesaid, shall neglect or refuse to take a deposition, such adverse party shall be entitled to recover twenty-five cents a mile for actual travel of himself or his attorney, to attend the -same, by action on the case, unless seasonably notified in writing, signed by the party giving such notice, that such deposition will not be taken.” Revised Statutes-, eh. 188, sec. 22.

Under the foregoing statement, of facts, this action can be maintained; and the plaintiffs are entitled to, recover for the travel of their attorney-each way.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 16, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK  | * Branch       | Fifth Thid Bank, Grand Rapids, MI to establish a branch at the southeast corner of State Route 54 and Grand Boulevard, New Port Richey, FL. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Howard Ives, *Respondent, v.*Henry B. Lockwood, *Appellant.*

Order reversed and motion granted, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-72,111-02

EX P ARTE DONALD RAY R ECTOR, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. WRIT12207 IN THE 196TH DIST RICT COURT

F ROM HUNT COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to manufa cture or delivery o f a co n trolled substance and was sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appea l his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary beca use trial counsel threa t en ed h i m with the pos sibili ty of l ife im prisonment. Applicant has alleg ed facts t hat, i f t rue, might entitle him to relief

. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent , 393 S.W .3d 781 (Tex. Crim. Ap p . 2013). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate for

um for findings of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court2

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s cla im. I n this response , trial counsel shall state whether he told Applicant he could be sentenc ed to life imprisonment, and if so, what this was based on. I n developing the re cord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court sha ll imm ediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall ensure the habea s rec ord is supplemented with co p i es o f t he plea paper work, admonishments, and a transcr ipt of the plea proce eding s. The tri al co u rt shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but f or counsel’s alleg ed defic ient perf ormanc e. The trial court shall also make fi ndings of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant had prior convictions that could have been used to enhanc e his punishment. The trial court may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claim. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and co n clusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: January

11, 2023 Do not publish
OFFER FOR THE SALE OF MILK
                           --------------------------

         On October 19, 2001 Mastellone Hermanos, S.A. ("MHSA") issue to Danone
S.A. ("Danone") an Offer for the Sale of Milk (the "Milk Offer"). Such Offer was
accepted by Danone.

         Under the Milk Offer, MHSA is irrevocably obliged to sell and Danone is
irrevocably obliged to purchase specified quantities of specified milk (the
"Milk"). The effective date of the Milk Offer is January 1, 2002. Danone's
rights under the Offer expire 4 years after the effective date. However, such
rights are automatically extended for periods of 2 years unless either MHSA or
Danone notifies the other party at least 180 days prior to the automatic renewal
date that MHSA or Danone wishes the arrangement.

         Under the Milk Offer, the specifications and particularities of the
Milk to be sold to Danone are identified. MHSA guarantees to Danone that the
Milk sold under the Milk Offer will meet such specifications, and that with all
the argentine federal, provincial and municipal rules and regulations. MHSA
shall deliver the Milk to Danone at Danone's plant in Longchamp, Province of
Buenos Aires, unless Danone specifies a new place of delivery.

         Under the Milk Offer MHSA is responsible for the quality of raw milk
until the milk arrives at the designated points of delivery. If MHSA does not
meet the requirements agreed, or does not supply the Milk to Danone in
accordance with the Milk Offer, MHSA shall pay Danone a fine of $20 per each
tone of Milk not delivered or Milk that does not meet such requirements.

         The estimated amount of Milk to be purchased by Danone is agreed
annually between Danone and MHSA. In addition, every month Danone shall submit
to MHSA a monthly requirement of Milk, specifying the amount of Milk needed each
week of such month. Likewise, each week Danone shall confirm -or modify- to MHSA
such requirement. If the amount of Milk purchased by Danone is less than the
amount requested, MHSA shall process the excess and converted into powder Milk
which shall be sold to Danone.

         Danone has agreed to pay MHSA a purchase at a formula that incorporates
the price to be paid to the dairy farmers, plus certain other fees for
transpiration, classification and coordination, plus certain costs of MHSA
incurred to purchase the Milk to the dairy farms, plus a commission of 1% over
the referred items, plus gross income tax. Furthermore, Danone must pay all
value added taxes. Danone. Interest charged shall be 6% over the 6 month LIBO
rate.

         If a Danone fails to pay MHSA for 20 consecutive days or for 60
alternate days, MHSA may rescind the Milk Offer or suspend performance of its
obligations until Danone pays all its outstanding debts. Finally, both the
Danone and MHSA have the right to rescind the Milk Offer if a party is insolvent
or the Commercial Assistance Agreements are cancelled.
EX-10.4






Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT NO. 2




TO




BRUSH ENGINEERED MATERIALS INC.




1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




(AS AMENDED MARCH 3, 1998)




Recitals




WHEREAS, Brush Engineered Materials Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Brush Engineered
Materials Inc. 1995 Stock incentive Plan (As Amended March 3, 1998) (the “Plan).



WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan further to add operating profit to the list
of Management Objectives (“Amendment No. 2”); and




WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved this Amendment No. 1.



Amendment




NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 1, effective as of February
1, 2005, as follows:



1. The enumerated list in the definition of “Management Objectives” in Section 2 of the Plan
is amended to read as follows:




(i) return on invested capital;



	 	 	 
	(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

	 	return on equity;

return on operating assets;

earnings per share;








(v) market value per share; and/or


(vi) operating profit.



2. Except as amended by Amendment No. 1, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
§ 56.80-10 Forming (reproduces 129.2). ( a ) Piping components may be formed (swaging, lapping, or upsetting of pipe ends, extrusion of necks, etc.) by any suitable hot or cold working method, providing such processes result in formed surfaces which are uniform and free of cracks or other defects, as determined by methods of inspection specified in the design.
( b ) [Reserved]
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19
 
                                April 10, 1997


                                                                         DIG 3-4


VIA FACSIMILE
-------------

Dr. Edmund Y. Sun
Digital Video Systems, Inc.
2710 Walsh Avenue
Santa Clara, California 95051


Dear Ed:
 
      This will confirm that my last day of service as the President of Digital
Video Systems will be April 14, 1997 but that I will be continuing as a Director
and Chairman of the Executive Committee OF DVS. (I am terminating my employment
as President of DVS pursuant to Section 6 of the Consulting and Employment
Agreement dated March 15, 1996 between DVS and myself, and DVS and I are waiving
the 60-day notice requirement of Section 6.)

      You and I have agreed, subject to approval by the Board of Directors of
DVS, that the options granted to me pursuant to Section 3 of the Consulting and
Employment Agreement shall vest as follows:

      (a) Options to purchase 187,500 shares shall vest and become exercisable
on May 6, 1997 for the term described in the options; provided that I continue
to serve as a director of DVS through at least May 8, 1997.
 
      (b) Options to purchase 162,500 shares shall vest and become exercisable
on a pro rata basis over 48 months for each full month of completed service by
me as a director of DVS after May 2, 1997 (the first vesting date covering
options for approximately 3,385 shares being June 7, 1997), with the options to
be exercisable for the term described in such options.
<PAGE>
 
Dr. Edmund Sun
April 10, 1997
Page 2



      (c) The remaining 400,000 options granted to me under Section 3 have been
cancelled effective as of March 26, 1997.

      (d) The options that will be cancelled pursuant to (c) above will be
allocated for cancellation pro rata between my options that are in the D.H.
Blair performance escrow (the "Escrow") and my options that are not in the
Escrow. Similarly, the options that will vest and become exercisable pursuant to
(a) and (b) above will be allocated pro rata between my options that are in the
Escrow and my options that are not in the Escrow.

      It has been a pleasure working with you as the President of DVS, and I 
look forward to continuing to work with you to make the Company a great success.


                                Very truly yours,
                                                  

                                Robert B. Pfannkuch


Acknowledged and Agreed to
Digital Video Systems, Incorporated


By:   ________________________
      Dr. Edmund Y. Sun
      Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James T. Riffe, Executive Vice President and Cashier of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James T. Riffe

James T. Riffe

Executive Vice President and Cashier

March 26, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1409 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1409

    To provide for funding for Federal employee pay adjustments and 
comparability payments through reductions in agency spending on service 
                    contracts for fiscal year 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1995

  Ms. Norton (for herself and Mrs. Morella) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and 
                               Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for funding for Federal employee pay adjustments and 
comparability payments through reductions in agency spending on service 
                    contracts for fiscal year 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEE PAY ADJUSTMENTS AND 
              COMPARABILITY PAYMENTS THROUGH REDUCTIONS IN AGENCY 
              SPENDING FOR SERVICE CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Of the funds provided in appropriation Acts for 
fiscal year 1996 to all departments, agencies, and instrumentalities in 
the executive branch of the Federal Government--
            (1) the total amount otherwise available for purposes of 
        entering into service contracts with private entities is hereby 
        reduced by $2,000,000,000; and
            (2) the total amount otherwise available for purposes of 
        pay schedule adjustments and locality-based comparability 
        payments under sections 5303 and 5304 of title 5, United States 
        Code, is hereby increased by such sum.
    (b) Allocation of Amounts.--The Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget shall allocate the reductions and increases 
required by subsection (a) among the appropriate accounts, and shall 
submit to the Congress a report setting forth such allocation.
    (c) Agency Certification.--Each department, agency, and 
instrumentality in the executive branch of the Federal Government shall 
submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, within 
90 days after the end of fiscal year 1996, a certification of 
compliance with subsection (a) in accordance with the allocations made 
pursuant to subsection (b). Not later than 120 days after the end of 
fiscal year 1996, the Director shall submit to the Congress a report 
setting forth the certifications of compliance received by the Director 
under this subsection.
    (d) Service Contracts.--For the purposes of this section the term 
``service contract'' has the meaning given such term in part 37 of 
title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

250 EAST FLAMINGO, LLC. 

et al., 

 Petitioners, 

 Case No. 2:15-mc-50702 

v. District Judge Paul D. Borman 

 Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

FRANK TADDEO, et al., 

 Respondents. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONERS TO PROVIDE STATUS OF 

SERVICE ON RESPONDENTS 

 Petitioners filed this miscellaneous action in the Eastern District of Michigan 

on May 14, 2015, seeking an order quashing the subpoenas served by Respondents 

in District of Nevada Case No. 2:12-cv-01110 for depositions of non-parties to 

occur in the Eastern District of Michigan. (DE 1.) On May 18, 2015, this matter 

was referred to me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(a). (DE 2.) 

 To date, the docket reflects that Respondents have not been served with 

notice of this action in the Eastern District of Michigan. Moreover, Petitioners’ 

motion does not contain a certificate of service. It is unclear to this Court whether 

Respondents have been served in this matter. In the interest of efficiency, 

2:15-mc-50702-PDB-APP Doc # 5 Filed 06/01/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 280
2

Petitioners are hereby ORDERED to provide the status of service over 

Respondents ON OR BEFORE JUNE 5, 2015. Petitioners should also indicate 

whether they intend to proceed with this matter in the Eastern District of Michigan. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 1, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on June 1, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

(313) 234-5200 

2:15-mc-50702-PDB-APP Doc # 5 Filed 06/01/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 281