alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 19, 2007, 1 p.m. to June 19, 2007, 1:30 p.m., The Fairmont Washington, DC, 2401 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 21, 2007, 72 FR 28515-28517.                

The meeting was cancelled due to administration problems.

Dated: May 22, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2669  Filed 5-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRY LEE MOCK, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-14924 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

AMEND COMPLAINT AND ADD PARTIES 

 Plaintiff filed this action in state court on November 25, 2014, and 

Defendants removed the action to this Court on December 30, 2014. On January 

21, 2015, this Court entered a scheduling order giving Plaintiff until February 21, 

2015, to file an Amended Complaint without further leave from the Court. 

Plaintiff seeks to extend that date by 30 days. The Court denies the request. 

Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the Complaint if Plaintiff develops 

sufficient support for such a motion. At that time, the Court will evaluate whether 

to permit an amended pleading. The Court sees no basis to extend the originallyset deadline at this point. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to extend time to amend 

complaint and add parties is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's right, at a 

later point, to file a properly-supported and properly-formatted motion to amend. 

2:14-cv-14924-MFL-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 03/02/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 137
 2 

Any such motion shall strictly comply with the requirements of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 2, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on March 2, 2015, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113

2:14-cv-14924-MFL-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 03/02/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 138
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”), is made as of February 1, 2005, by and between MAYOR’S JEWELERS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
“EMPLOYER”) and THOMAS A. ANDRUSKEVICH, domiciled in New Jersey (the “EXECUTIVE”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the EMPLOYER and the EXECUTIVE are parties to that certain Amended Employment Agreement dated as of June 24, 2004 (the “Amended
Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which the EMPLOYER agreed to continue the employment of the EXECUTIVE upon the terms and conditions contained therein; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to confirm and document certain modifications and changes to the terms and conditions of
the Amended Employment Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing premises and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	4.	Amendment to Amended Employment Agreement 

  

	 	a.	The last sentence of Section 4.2 of the Amended Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

  
 4.2 The EMPLOYER shall pay the entire annual bonus (if any)
that is payable with respect to a fiscal year in a lump sum cash payment as soon as practicable after the Compensation Committee can determine whether the performance goals have been achieved based on the EMPLOYER’s audited financial results
for such year but no later than the earlier of two and one half months after such fiscal year end or the date on which the audited financial statements are completed and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  

	 	5.	Full Force and Effect. All of the provisions of the Amended Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect except as expressly modified by this Amendment.


  

	 	6.	Counterparts. The parties may sign this Amendment, which may be delivered by facsimile, in counterparts. Each signed counterpart will be an original; and all of them
constitute one and the same agreement. 

  
 NOW
THEREFORE, the parties have entered into this Amendment effective as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	EMPLOYER	 	EXECUTIVE
		
	 MAYOR’S JEWELERS, INC.
	 	 
		
	 /s/ Marc Weinstein

	 	 /s/ Thomas A. Andruskevich


	 By:
	 	 Marc Weinstein
	 
	 Its:
	 	 Senior Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer
	 	THOMAS A. ANDRUSKEVICH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains financial information extracted from Columbia
Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,377,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,672<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,898,745<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,898,745<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               799,291<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                532,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            532,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   532,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $31,672.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $489,738.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $82,257, accrued brokerage
commissions of $13,211, accrued management fees of $29,255, administrative
expenses payable of $78,867, accrued transaction fees and costs of
$977 and incentive fee payable of $75,961.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $585,978, net change
in unrealized of $123,762 and interest income of $89,551.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# UST Technical Compendium Category 2:

New/Upgraded UST Systems (NUS)
NOTE: QA documents referred to in some of the following responses may be outdated. Visit The EPA Quality System web site for the latest version of EPA's QA documents.

Question 14: What are the monitoring/inspection requirements when using the combination of internal lining and cathodic protection (CP) as a corrosion upgrade option? Answer: There are three scenar ios that might occur when using this corrosion upgrade option. They are: 1. Applying internal lining and CP at the same time. 2. Applying CP to an UST with an internal lining. 3. Applying an internal lining to an UST with CP. For all options, the CP system needs to be monitored in accordance with 40 CFR Part 280.31. Periodic inspections of the lined tank are not required if the integrity of the UST was ensured prior to the addition of CP. Because integrity assessment is part of the industry lining co des, this will be the case in scenarios 1 and 3, but not necessarily 2. For example, if CP is added to an UST that was lined 5 years ago, but the integrity of the UST was not ensured prior to adding the CP, then periodic inspections of the lined tank are required. [ December 4, 1995 memorandum to State and Regional Program Managers (PDF) (4 pp, 15K) ] 

## http://epa.gov/oust/compend/nus.htm
Exhibit 32.1

                    MAXUS REAL PROPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Maxus Real Property  Investors-Four,
L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, David L. Johnson,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Maxus
Capital  Corp.,  General  Partner of the  Partnership,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership  as of May 31,  2004  (the last date of the  period  covered  by the
Report).


/s/ David L. Johnson
-----------------------
David L. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Maxus Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership
July 1, 2004
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Nicholas et al., Appellants.

[Cite as *State v. Nicholas*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 20.]

(No. 98-1016

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*Timothy A. Oliver,*Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Carolyn A. Duvelius,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Gray & Duning*and *Donald E. Oda II,*for appellants.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 56.50-45 Circulating pumps. ( a ) A main circulating pump and emergency means for circulating water through the main condenser must be provided. The emergency means may consist of a connection from an independent power pump fitted between the main circulating pump and the condenser.
( b ) Independent sea suctions must be provided for the main circulating and the emergency circulating pumps.
( c ) A cross connection between the circulating pumps in the case of multiple units will be acceptable in lieu of an independent power pump connection.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41266 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ANTHONY GLOVER

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 146

- 2

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Glover has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Glover has filed a response and a request for appointment of new counsel . We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein , as well as Glover ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 27, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-41266 Document: 00514659695 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2018No. 17

- 41266

2 that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly

, Glover’s request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-41266 Document: 00514659695 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2018
# C_2012039EN.01001402.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/14

---

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 —  VE (*1) v Commission

(Case T-274/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Contractual agents - Expatriation allowance - Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Notion of habitual residence - Distortion of the facts - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)

(2012/C 39/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant(s): VE (*1) (represented by L. Vogel, lawyer)

Other party/parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 in Case F-28/10  VE (*1) v Commission [2011] ECR-SC I-A-I-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | VE (*1) will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

VE (*1) will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending February 16, 2008

|Filer               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|UCBH HOLDINGS, INC. | * 3A3         | UCBH Holdings, Inc., San Francisco, California, to acquire up to 6.52 percent of First American International Corporation, and thereby indirectly its subsidiary, First American International Bank, both of Brooklyn, New York. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/22/2008
|Newspaper:          | Not available
|Federal Register:   | 02/22/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location      | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|UNITED BK ID, DRIGGS, IDAHO | 3446766 | 09/24/2007 | 01/08/2008     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 15-20382

Plaintiff,

v Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

PAUL NICOLETTI,

Defendant.

_____________________________

EXHIBIT LIST

1. SIGTARP press release December 6, 2013

2. SEC Order 33-9490, December 4, 2013

3. United States Attorney SD NY Press Release, October 6, 2015

4. United States ex rei. George Mann, et al, v. Fifth Third Bancorp Settlement

Agreement, Exhibit 4

5. Wall Street Journal article re: Fifth Third settlement with Freddie Mac, 

November 25, 2013

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 28-1 Filed 08/05/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 91
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 1, 2006  /s/ Francis L. Simola Francis L. Simola Chairman, President and CEO
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24C
 
                           SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints JOSEPH HINES and CLARENCE J. BAUDHUIN, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 1997, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.
 
DATED: October 7, 1997
 
                                                  /s/  DOUGLAS AYER
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                       DOUGLAS AYER
STATE OF ARIZONA
                               ss.
County of Maricopa
 
     On this 7th day of October, 1997, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally appeared DOUGLAS AYER, known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same
for the purposes therein contained.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
 
                                                 /s/  JANICE BACKUS
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Notary Public
 
My commission expires:
 
October 23, 1997
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 28, 2009

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|CAPON VALLEY BANK | * Branch       | Capon Valley Bank, Wardensville, West Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 5511 S. Main Street, Stephens City, Virginia 22655. | Newspaper:03/07/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 03/07/2009    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us