alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 141 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 141

To amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to eliminate the discretion of 
  the court in connection with the denial of certain Federal benefits 
               upon conviction of certain drug offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to eliminate the discretion of 
  the court in connection with the denial of certain Federal benefits 
               upon conviction of certain drug offenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Benefit Suspension Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF BENEFITS.

    Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``at the discretion of the court,'' 
                each place it appears;
                    (B) by striking ``any or'' each place it appears; 
                and
                    (C) by striking ``up to'' each place it appears; 
                and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), by striking 
                ``and at the discretion of the court--'' and all that 
                follows through the end of such subparagraph, and 
                inserting ``be ineligible for any Federal benefits for 
                one year; and''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (1)(B)--
                            (i) by striking ``up to'';
                            (ii) by striking ``as determined by the 
                        court''; and
                            (iii) by striking ``The court shall 
                        continue'' and all that follows through ``under 
                        clause (i).''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012032EN.01003901.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/39

---

Action brought on 2 December 2011 — BSH v OHIM (ecodoor)

(Case T-625/11)

2012/C 32/77

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by S. Biagosch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 September 2011 in Case R 340/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 September 2011 in Case R 340/2011-1;

| — | Order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ecoDoor’ for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the Community mark concerned is distinctive and not purely descriptive.

Pleas in law:

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2023

- 3179

_____________________________
D OMONIC D AISEE R OBINSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

F LORIDA F INANCIAL S ERVICES , R ISK M ANAGEMENT , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction.

February 21, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
B ILBREY , T ANENBAUM , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Domonic Daisee Robinson
, pro se, Petitioner

. No appearance for Respondent.
Order entered September 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00214
- CR
ANTHONY TERRENCE SMI TH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. F12
- 71255
- V



### O RDER Appellant’s brief was originally due May 29, 2014. On August 4, 2014, this Court adopted the trial court’s findings that appellant is indigent and desires to pursue the appeal and that counsel William Barr represent ed to the trial court that appellant’s brief would be filed by August 18, 2014. We ordered that appellant’s brief be filed by August 18, 2014. We further warned counsel William Barr that if the brief was not filed by that date, we would order him removed as appellant’s attorney and would order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. To date, Mr. Barr has neither filed appellant’s brief nor communicated with the Court regarding the appeal. Accordingly, we ORDER William Barr removed as appellant’s appointed attorney of
record.We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal

and to transmit a supplemental record containing the order appointing new counsel to this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Lawrence Mitchell, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all parties.
We ABATE the appeal to allow t he trial court to comply with this order. The appeal will be reinstated fifteen days from the date of this order or when the order appointing new counsel is received.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### § 58.60-9 Industrial systems: Design.

Each system under this subpart must be designed and analyzed in accordance with the principles of API RP 14C (incorporated by reference, see § 58.03-1).

[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50183, June 12, 2024]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

R.L.S. Rental Company, Inc,. dlb/a Mizzou Aviation



### v. City of Joplin, Missouri Complainant, FAA Docket No . 16-13-06

Respondent.


### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by w h ich the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to Apri l 1, 2016
. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

r ir cting Director, Office ofAi port Compl iance and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 3. 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension ofTime addressed to: Counsel for Complainant: Shelley A. Ewalt McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jer icho, NY 11753 Respondent: Mr. Peter Edwards 602 South Main Street Joplin , MO 64801 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-6 J 0 FAA Airport Comp li ance and Field Operations , AC0-1 00

C l audia Roberts Office of Airport Compl iance

and Management Analysis
§ 54.25-8 Radiography (modifies UW-11(a), UCS-57, UNF-57, UHA-33, and UHT-57). ( a ) Full radiography is required for all Class I and Class I-L vessels regardless of thickness. (Refer to table 2 to § 54.01-5 for applicable requirements.)
( b ) Class II-L vessels must be spot radiographed. The exemption provided in UW-11(c) of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) does not apply. (Refer to table 2 to § 54.01-5 for applicable requirements.)
( c ) Each butt-welded joint in a Class II or III pressure vessel cargo tank must be spot radiographed, in accordance with UW-52, regardless of diameter or thickness, and each weld intersection or crossing must be radiographed for a distance of at least 10 thicknesses from the intersection.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50964, Dec. 11, 1989; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65170, Oct. 31, 2008]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Southwest Washington Province Advisory Committee will meet on Friday, July 13, 2007, at the Gifford Pinchot National Forest Headquarters, 10600 NE 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m.

The purpose of the meeting is to share information and receive feedback on: Special Forest Products on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest; Update on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest's Flood Damage; and to share information among Committee members.

All Southwest Washington Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The “open forum” provides an opportunity for the public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory Committee. The “open forum” is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Interested speakers will need to register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written comments on Committee business at any time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Strebig, Public Affairs Officer, at (360) 891-5005, or write Forest Headquarters Office: Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 10600 NE 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

      ( print page 32058)    
Dated: June 4, 2007.

Claire Lavendel,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-2881 Filed 6-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 62.20-5 Self-certification. ( a ) The designer or manufacturer of an automated system must certify to the Coast Guard, in writing, that the automation is designed to meet the environmental design standards of § 62.25-30. Plan review, shipboard testing, or independent testing to these standards is not required.
( b ) [Reserved]
Note 1 to § 62.20-5 :
Self-certification should normally accompany plan submittal.
[EXHIBIT 32.1]

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10K of
Admiral Financial Corp. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, Wm. Lee
Popham, Chairman, CEO and CFO of Admiral Financial Corp. hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
that:

1.  Such Annual Report on Form 10K for the period ended June 30, 2007,
    fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10K for the
    period ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
    the financial condition and results of operations of Admiral Financial
    Corp.


Date:   September 28, 2007             By:   /s/  Wm. Lee Popham
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Wm. Lee Popham, Chairman,
                                          CEO and CFO
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

Michael D. McLachlan, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Ann Arbor Credit Bureau, Collection 

Division, Inc. 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:15-cv-11675-LJM-APP 

Hon. Laurie J. Michelson 

Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the 

parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree, that the abovecaptioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The parties further 

agree that each side shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Dated: February 16, 2016 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys 

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on February 16, 2016. 

 s/Jane Johnson 

Case Manager to 

 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 
2

Stipulated and Agreed: 

/s/ Brian P. Parker (w/consent) 

Brian P. Parker (P48617) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

2000 Town Center, Ste. 1900 

Southfield, MI 48075 

Tel: (248) 642-6268 

brianparker@collectionstopper.com

/s/ Charity A. Olson 

Charity A. Olson (P68295) 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2723 S. State St., Ste. 150 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

Tel: (734) 222-5179 

colson@olsonlawpc.com

Dated: February 12, 2016
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

Dated: June 9, 2009 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: June 9, 2009 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John H. Hollis and J. Lloyd Abbot, *Respondents, v.*Edwin D. Chadick, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
§ 196.30-5 Accidents to machinery. ( a ) In the event of an accident to a boiler, unfired pressure vessel, or machinery tending to render the further use of the item unsafe until repairs are made, or if by ordinary wear such items become unsafe, a report shall be made by the Chief Engineer immediately to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, or if at sea, immediately upon arrival at port.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 13, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending May 31, 2008

|Filer                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|MENARD BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Notice by Carolyn V. Kothmann, Menard, Texas, Carl G. Kothmann, Menard, Texas, Benny F. Kothmann, Menard, Texas, Dora L. Wright, Menard, Texas, Stanley C. Kothmann, Southlake, Texas, LaVerne C. Kothmann, Menard, Texas, and Kaddo F. Kothmann, Garden City, Texas, to acquire an interest in Menard Bancshares, Inc., Menard, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire Menard National Bank, Menard, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/12/2008
|Newspaper:              | Not available
|Federal Register:       | 06/12/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2522 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2522

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To raise the ceiling on the Federal share of the cost of the Calleguas 
  Municipal Water District Recycling Project, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 
That section 1631(d) of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-13(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraphs (2) and (3)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) In the case of the Calleguas Municipal Water District 
Recycling Project authorized by section 1616, the Federal share of the 
cost of the Project may not exceed the sum determined by adding--
            ``(A) the amount that applies to the Project under 
        paragraph (1); and
            ``(B) $40,000,000.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```