alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending October 3, 2009

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|CAPGEN CAPITAL GROUP LLC | * 3A3          | CapGen Capital Group LLC, and CapGen Capital Group LP, both of New York, New York, to increase their investment in The BANKshares, Inc., Winter Park, Florida, and its subsidiary, BankFIRST, Winter Park, Florida, by 14.4% to a total of 36.2%. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/26/2009 
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | 10/26/2009    
|CECIL BANK               | * 18C* Branch  | Cecil Bank, Elkton, Maryland, to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the Bel Air, Maryland, branch of K Bank, Owings Mills, Maryland.                                                                                        | Newspaper:10/26/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 10/26/2009    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF MARION, MARION, VIRGINIA      | 858528 | 06/01/2009 | 09/21/2009     | S         | Large Bank 
|BANK OF MONROE, UNION, WEST VIRGINIA  | 849432 | 06/22/2009 | 09/23/2009     | O         | Small Bank 
|NORTHERN NECK ST BK, WARSAW, VIRGINIA | 550327 | 06/01/2009 | 09/03/2009     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 13, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 56.90-1 General.

The assembly of the various piping components, whether done in a shop or as field erection, must be done so that the completely erected piping conforms with the requirements of the regulations in this subchapter.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending May 16, 2009

|Filer                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|CASTLE CREEK CAPITAL III LLC | * 3A3          | Castle Creek Capital Partners III LP, Castle Creek Capital III LLC, Eggemeyer Capital LLC, Ruh Capital LLC, and Legions IV Advisory Corp., all of Rancho Santa Fe, California, to acquire up to 19.9 percent of Guaranty Bancorp, and thereby indirectly its subsidiary, Guaranty Bank and Trust Company, both of Denver, Colorado. | Newspaper:06/11/2009Federal Register:Not available    
|Newspaper:                   | 06/11/2009    
|Federal Register:            | Not available 
|HERITAGE BANK OF COMMERCE    | * 18C* Branch  | Heritage Bank of Commerce, San Jose, California, to purchase the assets and assume the liabilities of two branches of Wachovia Bank, N.A., Charlotte, North Carolina.                                                                                                                                                               | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                   | Not available 
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
SERVED: FEBRUARY 22, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATlONl^^'.y^^-'^^Anrn^ifK^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS • A-^^ti ^-i TM. - • 

WASHINGTON, DC 

ml rtB 72 P 3^ 2' 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ERJCK ALBERTO MEDINA 

FAA DOCKET NO [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA^2012-0027 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011WP230044) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Adniinistrativ^Law 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0027 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Erick Alberto Medina, Respondent 

All E. Elk Avenue 

Glendale,CA 91205 

FAX: 818-552-2895 ATTN: Susana 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AWP-7 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Ac/ministrative Lmv Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S^E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Scr\'ice was by U.S. Mail. For ser\'ice in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue. S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Wasliington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0138

____________________________________________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF )

)

JACQUILINE STEINMANN, ) 

)

Petitioner/Appellee, )

) ORDER FOR

) EXTENSION 

-and- ) 

) 

BRETT STEINMANN, )

)

Respondent/Appellant. )

UPON review of the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File

Opening Brief by counsel for the Respondent/Appellant herein and good cause 

appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time to file Appellant’s Opening 

Brief is extended to the 20th day of July, 2023.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

cc: Karl Knuchel

Christopher Gillette

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 20 2023

06/20/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0138
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, April 3, 1995 (54), Para 54.18 H. Res. 120--Unfinished Business]
[Page 526]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.54.18  h. res. 120--unfinished business

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, pursuant to 
clause 5, rule I, announced the further unfinished business to be the 
motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution (H. Res. 120) 
expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding American 
citizens held in Iraq; as amended.
  The question being put,
  Will the House suspend the rules and agree to said resolution, as 
amended?
  The vote was taken by electronic device.

It was decided in the

Yeas

399

affirmative

Nays

0
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00174-CV

In the Interest of J. R. M., a Child

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-FAM-4948-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant, although he is exempt from payment due to his inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 30, 2020
Exhibit 10.2



  
 Exhibit 10.2

  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 (this
“Amendment”) to THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated October 1, 2001, which was amended effective September 21, 2004 (the “Agreement”), by and between Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. (the
“Company”) and Stanley J. Olander (the “Executive”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS,
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code has recently become effective and guidance received under that Section permits plans to be amended to comply and/or terminated this year. The Executive and the Company desire to so amend the Agreement; and

  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14 of the Agreement, the
Agreement may be amended by the Company and the Executive; 
  
 NOW
THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby further amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section 8 is amended to include a subsection (d), which reads: “This Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the merger of the Company into a subsidiary of Colonial Properties Trust in 2005. In this event, the Company shall pay
the Executive in 2005 a lump sum amount equal to his salary (calculated in accordance with Section 3(a) hereof) for the remainder of the term of the Agreement. Thereafter, the Company shall have no further obligations to the Executive under this
Agreement.” 
  
 2. Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have their respective meanings as used in the Agreement. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment as of the date indicated below. 
  

					
	 CORNERSTONE REALTY INCOME TRUST, INC.
	 	 
			
	/s/ Glade M. Knight	 	 	 	Date: February 8, 2005
	 By: Glade M. Knight
	 	 	 	 
	 Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
	 	 	 	Date: February 8, 2005
	 Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending May 3, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF THE JAMES | * Branch       | Bank of the James, Lynchburg, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 1405 Ole Dominion Boulevard, Bedford, Virginia. | Newspaper:05/10/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 05/10/2008    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Independence Holding Company Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       229,015,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  24,863,000
<MORTGAGE>                                      26,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             327,842,000
<CASH>                                       4,107,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         129,030,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      15,137,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             503,429,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            219,134,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         19,724,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                              78,131,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,619,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,289,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 100,200,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               503,429,000
<PREMIUMS>                                  39,097,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         12,145,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             173,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,316,000
<BENEFITS>                                  29,065,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,491,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,218,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,063,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,155,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,155,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### SALEM GLASS WORKS v. MARGRET MULLER (IMPLEADED, ETC.).

Argued January 16, 1929

Decided October 14, 1929.

Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justice Pakicee.

Eor the plaintiff, *Harry B. Cooper.*

Eor the defendant, *Joseph Silverstein.*

Pee Cukiam.

The suit in its present aspects is against the alleged endorser of two trade acceptances in the hands of the plaintiff as a holder in due course. The only question argued is one of fact, and is whether the endorsements appearing to be those of the defendant, Margret Muller, are her proper endorsements. She is a woman over eighty years of age and, being sworn as a witness, denied the genuiness of her signature, and it was not claimed that it had been signed by anyone else with her authority. The witness Wentworth for the plaintiff testified with much particularity about visiting Mrs. Muller at her house and seeing her sign the two endorsements, using a pen and ink which her grandson, Eay Muller, according to Wentworth’s testimony, produced for that purpose. This is the only evidence before us of the genuiness of Mrs. Muller’s signature and it is flatly contradicted by her testimony. Eay Muller was not sworn by either party as a witness, no expert of any handwriting was called in, nor was any ordinary witness who claimed to be familiar with Mrs. Mul*874ler’s signature or with her handwriting. Mrs. Muller, at the suggestion of her counsel, made specimens of her writing at the trial which were put in evidence and which were used by the jury, but are not submitted to us, nor are the trade acceptances nor the photostatic copies thereof which seem to have been used at the trial. Under these circumstances we are clear that the verdict of the jury on this question of fact should not be disturbed, even though the court charged the jury (erroneously as it seems to us) that the burden was upon Mrs. Muller to show that her signature was fraudulent. The remarks of the court touching the age of the defendant and the possibility that the Court of Chancery should look over her interests, may have been superfluous and perhaps ill-advised; but in our judgment they are not a sufficient justification for setting aside this verdict.

The rule to show cause will therefore be discharged.
#### O’Sullivan, Appellant, *v.*Provident Bancorp, Inc. et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *O’Sullivan v. Provident Bancorp, Inc.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 1255.]

(No. 98-235

Submitted January 26, 1999

Decided March 3, 1999.)

*Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook, Robert E. Manley*and *Robert H. Mitchell,*for appellant.

*1256*Keating, Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L., James E. Burke, Daniel E. Izenson*and *Douglas L. Hensley,*for appellees.

The cause is dismissed, *sua sponte,*as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20627 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

D-3 MARCOS DELGADO, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On July 12, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on July 12, 

2016, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The failure to file objections waives any 

right to appeal the magistrate judge’s findings that Defendant was competent to enter a plea, and 

that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, without coercion, and with a basis in fact. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 88, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 87, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

1:14-cr-20627-TLL-PTM Doc # 95 Filed 07/28/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 373
Dated: July 28, 2016 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on July 28, 2016. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20627-TLL-PTM Doc # 95 Filed 07/28/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 374
#### In the Matter of Adelaide Clement.

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.