US. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

June 10, 2015 

Ms. Maureen Nutt 

Parent of Anna Nutt 

985 East Riverbend Street 

Superior, CO 80027 

Dear Ms. Nutt: 

Exemption No. 11781 

800 Independence Ave . S W 

Washington. 0 C 20591 

Regulatory Docket No. F AA-20 15-1090 

This letter is to infonn you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter posted to the docket on April21 , 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of your daughter Anna Nutt for an exemption from 

§ 121.311 (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Anna to exceed the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAA-approved 

child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child 

restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.)-registered aircraft. 

In Anna's case, since she is an adult, an exemption must also be granted from the requirement 

in § 121.311 (b) that the individual be a "child." However, the reasons for requesting this 

exemption do not differ materially from those presented by other petitioners, and the reasons 

stated by the FAA for granting other exemptions also apply to the situation you present. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register, because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Anna. 

AFS-15-1247-E 
2 

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption Nos. 7831 and 8264 (copies 

enclosed), the FAA f'ound that numerous persons with physical challenges had previously 

completed fli ghts using restraint systems. The use of these restraint systems addressed unique 

physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as 

descri bed in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition would not set any new 

precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that-

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed 

Grants of Exemption Nos. 7831 and 8264; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grants of Exemption Nos. 7831 

and 8264 also apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ I 06(1), 4011 3 and 4470 l, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, 1 hereby grant Anna Nutt an exemption from § 121.31 I (b). 

In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Anna is 

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311 (b) to the extent necessary 

to allow her to exceed the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAA-approved CRS 

during use aboard a U.S.-registered aircraft. 

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with Anna's parent or a caregiver 

accompanying her. Anna Nutt may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated 

behind her. In addition, Anna's parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and 

advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of 

each flight. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2020, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Si cere ~ '2~$ 

John Barbagallo 

De puty Director, Flight Sta ndards Service 

Enclosures