alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending January 10, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | Actions under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Actions under delegated authority

## Actions taken during the week ending April 4, 2009

----

Bank Branches, DomesticRichmondMiddleburg Bank, Middleburg, Virginia  -- to establish a branch at Scott Thomas Building, 5372 Discovery Park Boulevard, Williamsburg.					-Withdrawn, March 30, 2009 					ChicagoMidwest Bank of Western Illinois, Monmouth, Illinois  -- to establish a branch at North 6th Street and Highway 34, Monmouth.					-Approved, April 2, 2009 					

Bank Holding CompaniesDirector, BS&RInvestors Bancorp, MHC, Short Hills, New Jersey, and Investors Bancorp, Inc.  -- relief from certain commitments.					-Granted, April 1, 2009 					Kansas CityLas Vegas Bancorporation, Inc., Las Vegas, New Mexico  -- to retain its interest in Bethlehem Financial Corporation, Belen, and its subsidiary bank, My Bank.					-Approved, April 1, 2009 					

Extensions Of TimeClevelandFifth Third Bank, Grand Rapids, Michigan  -- extension to July 31, 2009, to establish a branch at 680 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois.					-Granted, April 3, 2009 					San FranciscoWilshire Bancorp, Inc., Los Angeles, California  -- extension of the processing period to May 4, 2009, for a notice to retain control of Wilshire and its subsidiary bank, Wilshire State Bank, Los Angeles, and a related request for a determination of qualified family partnership status.					-Granted, April 3, 2009 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | Actions under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: April 9, 2009
Document may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act 

Http:// www.epa/pesticide/foia but access is restricted to entities not 

engaged in the production sale or distribution of pesticides outside the 

United States
#### The State ex rel. Toledo Hospital, Appellee, *v.*Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, et al. Appellees; Kanary, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 228.]

(No. 96-1656

Submitted October 27, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*Marshall & Melhom*and *David L. O’Connell,*for appellee Toledo Hospital.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Reeve W. Kelsey,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Adminstrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission.

*Dorothy B. McCrory & Associates, Christopher S. Clark*and *Kurt M. Young,*for appellant John E. Kanary.

*229The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. Because I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, I respectfully dissent.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### § 67.95 Requirement for determination.

Evidence that a vessel was built in the United States must be on file for any vessel for which a coastwise or fishery endorsement is sought, unless the vessel is otherwise qualified for those endorsements under subpart J of this part.

[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49230, Sept. 25, 2009]
#### § 32.70-1 Application—TB/ALL.

All steel hull tank vessels, the construction or conversion of which was started prior to November 10, 1936, shall conform to the requirements in this subpart.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending October 18, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2014380EN.01000601.xml

| 27.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/6

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Gold East Paper and Gold Huasheng Paper v Council

(Case T-443/11) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of coated fine paper originating in China - Market economy treatment - Time-limit for adopting the MET decision - Diligent and impartial examination - Rights of the defence - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Burden of proof - Injury - Determination of the profit margin - Definition of the product concerned - Community industry - Causal link))

2014/C 380/07

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd (Jiangsu, China), and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd (Jiangsu) (represented by: V. Akritidis, Y. Melin and F. Crespo, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted initially by G. Berrisch, A. Polcyn, lawyers, and by N. Chesaites, Barrister, and subsequently by B. O’Connor, Solicitor, and by S. Gubel, lawyer)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents), Cepifine AISBL (Brussels, Belgium), Sappi Europe SA (Brussels), Burgo Group SpA (Altavilla Vicentina, Italy), and Lecta SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Ruessmann and W. Berg, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 of 6 May 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2011 L 128, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union, Cepifine AISBL, Sappi Europe SA, Burgo Group SpA and Lecta SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union, Cepifine AISBL, Sappi Europe SA, Burgo Group SpA and Lecta SA;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 115 (Friday, June 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 33237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; EARDA.
    Date: July 10, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5720363b3b2434173a363e3b79393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f485e53534c5c7f525e56531151565711585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864. 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: June 8, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2962 Filed 6-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEVLON CHAMBERS,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-cv-10654

v.

Hon. Mark A. Goldsmith

TRI-DIM FILTER CORPORATION,

Defendant.

GOLD STAR LAW, P.C.

CAITLIN E. MALHIOT (P76606)

MAIA E. JOHNSON (P40533)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

2701 Troy Center Dr., Ste. 400

Troy, MI 48084

(248) 275-5200

cmalhiot@goldstarlaw.com

mjohnson@goldstarlaw.com

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Devlon Chambers, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses this action without 

prejudice.

For the Plaintiff:

GOLD STAR LAW, P.C.

/s/ Caitlin E. Malhiot x

Caitlin E. Malhiot P76606

2701 Troy Center Dr., Ste. 400

Troy, MI 48084

(248) 275-5200

Date: March 25, 2015 cmalhiot@goldstarlaw.com

2:15-cv-10654-MAG-RSW Doc # 4 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 12
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Kristen Key, certify that on March 25, 2015 I served the foregoing to the 

Defendant by USPS First Class Mail, with the envelope addressed to:

Tri-Dim Filter Corporation

30600 Telegraph Rd., Ste. 2345

Bingham Farms, MI 48025

X /s/ Kristen Keyx

Kristen Key

Paralegal

Gold Star Law, P.C.

2:15-cv-10654-MAG-RSW Doc # 4 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 13
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00169

- CV

IN RE JOHN PAUL JENKINS

Original Proceeding

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- 1730

- 4

DISSENTING M EMORANDUM OPINION

Because I would summarily deny the petition for writ of mandamus, I respectfully

dissent.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Dissenting o pinion delivered and filed September 8 , 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY SIMKINS,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-12731

v. Honorable Sean F. Cox

 Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

COMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER TO CORRECT DEFICIENCY

Plaintiff Anthony Simkins filed a complaint in this Court on July 27, 2015,

seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Defendant Commissioner denying

Social Security Disability benefits. Plaintiff is proceeding without an attorney.

Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee of $400.00, nor has he filed an application

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), which would excuse him from prepaying the filing fee. In addition, although more than 120 days have passed since the

complaint was filed, the Defendant Commissioner has not been served. The

complaint is therefore subject to dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), as well as for

failure to pay the filing fee or ask for IFP status.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days of the date of this Order,

-1-

2:15-cv-12731-SFC-RSW Doc # 4 Filed 01/04/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 10
the Plaintiff must either pay the entire filing fee of $450.00, OR submit a signed

application to proceed without payment of the fee, and for service by the United

States Marshals. An application form is included with this Order. 

If Plaintiff does not comply with this Order, I will recommend that his

complaint be dismissed.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE

Date: January 4, 2016

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record

on January 4, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/C. Ciesla 

Case Manager 

-2-

2:15-cv-12731-SFC-RSW Doc # 4 Filed 01/04/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 11
#### John Lee *v.*Bridget Delahanty and others.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.,

Dykman, J., not sitting.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2992324-NOV-201010:11 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000701288
<NAME>                        Atrion Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    90
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                          8,684
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                           10,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      20,105
<PP&E>                                35,874
<DEPRECIATION>                         9,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        65,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  5,085
<BONDS>                               10,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 342
<OTHER-SE>                            42,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          65,516
<SALES>                               26,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      26,027
<CGS>                                 15,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         15,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       8,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,573
<INCOME-TAX>                             402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,171
<DISCONTINUED>                            99
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,270
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.58



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

§ 2.10-5 Exemptions. ( a ) Vessels owned or operated by a non-profit organization may be exempted from payment of the fees required by this subpart, only if the vessel is used exclusively for one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Training youth in boating, seamanship, or navigation skills;
( 2 ) Educating youth in a course of marine environmental studies;
( 3 ) Providing excursions for persons with disabilities as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [42 U.S.C. 12102(2)]; or
( 4 ) Providing medical services.
( b ) Vessels owned or operated by the Federal government or the government of any State or political subdivision thereunder may be exempted from the fees required by this subpart provided the vessel is used exclusively for one or more of the purposes listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The term *used exclusively* in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section does not preclude: ( 1 ) The carriage of adult volunteers or crew, or
( 2 ) The vessel's use for fundraising activities without regard to the age of the participants aboard the vessel, provided revenues raised are for the operation and maintenance of the vessel and that such fundraising activities do not exceed one day of fundraising for each month of the vessel's operating season.
( d ) Vessel owners or operators may submit a written request for exemption to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, of the Marine Inspection Zone in which the vessel normally operates. The exemption request must provide the vessel name, the vessel identification number, and evidence that the organization and the vessel meet the criteria set forth in this section. The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection will endorse and forward the request to Commandant (CG-DCO-83) for decision.
[CGD 96-067, 62 FR 19232, Apr. 21, 1997, as amended by CGD 96-067, 63 FR 59474, Nov. 4, 1998; USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60001, Sept. 29, 2010]
#### § 69.21 Right of appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal therefrom in accordance with subpart 1.03 of this chapter.

[CGD 88-033, 54 FR 50380, Dec. 6, 1989]
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Lacey, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Lacey*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 16.]

*17(No. 97-2319

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*R. Larry Schneider,*Union County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Rick Rodger,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1592

To require the Postmaster General to redraw ZIP code boundaries to coincide

with community boundaries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 1995

Mr. MCKEON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To require the Postmaster General to redraw ZIP code

boundaries to coincide with community boundaries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDRAWING OF ZIP CODE BOUNDARIES TO CO4 INCIDE WITH COMMUNITY BOUNDARIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Postmaster General

7 shall establish procedures to provide that boundaries de8 limiting any area included within any particular ZIP code

9 do not cross the boundary of any community.
2

•HR 1592 IH

1 (b) LIMITATION.—For purposes of subsection (a),

2 areas having the same 1st 5 ZIP code digits shall be con3 sidered to have the same ZIP code.

4 SEC 2. DEFINITIONS.

5 For purposes of this Act:

6 (1) COMMUNITY.—The term ‘‘community’’

7 means a political subdivision of a unit of general

8 local government, as determined by the unit of gen9 eral local government.

10 (2) UNIT OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT.—

11 The term ‘‘unit of general local government’’ means

12 any city, county, town, township, village, or other

13 general purpose political subdivision as established

14 by a State.

Æ
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending June 24, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|COMANCHE NATIONAL CORPORATION | * 3A3       | Comanche National Corporation, Comanche, Texas, and Comanche National Corporation of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, to acquire 100 percent The First National Bank of Santo, Santo, Texas. | Newspaper:07/17/2006Federal Register:07/14/2006
|Newspaper:                    | 07/17/2006 
|Federal Register:             | 07/14/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us