alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 11.0

               Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings



South Jersey Financial Corporation, Inc.
Computation of Per Share Earnings


                                           For the Three Months Ended     
                                     -------------------------------------
                                       March 31,         March 31,        
                                       1999                1998           
                                     -------------     -------------------
                                             (Dollars in thousands)       
                                                                         
Net (loss) income                     $   (1,146)       $          597    
                                     =============     ===================
                                                                         
Average shares outstanding              3,490,061              Na          
                                     =============     ===================
                                                                         
Earnings per share (1)                    $(0.40)              Na          
                                     =============     ===================




(1) Earnings per share, basic and diluted, are the same for the three months
    ended March 31, 1999 and represent data since becoming a public company on
    February 12, 1999.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending November 17, 2007

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|-------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF FAYETTE COUNTY THE | * Branch       | The Bank of Fayette County, Moscow, Tennessee to establish a branch facility to be located at the corner of Highway 64 and Chickasaw Ridge Drive, Oakland, Tennessee.    | Newspaper:11/30/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 11/30/2007    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable
|RUSSELLVILLE BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1          | Russellville Bancorp, Inc., Russellville, Missouri, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Community Bank of Russellville, Russellville, Missouri. | Newspaper:12/10/2007Federal Register:12/11/2007    
|Newspaper:                 | 12/10/2007    
|Federal Register:          | 12/11/2007    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 64.25 Cross section. A tank must have a cross section design that is— ( a ) Circular; or
( b ) Other than circular and stress analyzed experimentally by the method contained in UG-101 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 64.2).
[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50199, June 12, 2024]
Exhibit 99.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the filing of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter  Ended March 31, 2003 (the  "Report")  by American  Medical  Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


                                            /s/ Howard M. Siegel
                                            -----------------------
                                            Howard M. Siegel
                                            Chief Executive Officer

    A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED  TO  AMERICAN  MEDICAL  ALERT  CORP.  AND WILL BE  RETAINED BY AMERICAN
MEDICAL ALERT CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



                                      -25-
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1448 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1448

     To amend the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 to require that 
 determinations regarding status as an Indian child and as a member of 
an Indian tribe be prospective from the date of birth of the child and 
      of tribal membership of the member, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 1995

    Ms. Pryce (for herself, Mr. Solomon, and Mr. Burton of Indiana) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 to require that 
 determinations regarding status as an Indian child and as a member of 
an Indian tribe be prospective from the date of birth of the child and 
      of tribal membership of the member, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

    (a) Indian Child.--Paragraph (4) of section 4 of the Indian Child 
Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1903) is amended by inserting ``at the 
time of the child's birth'' after ``Indian tribe'' the third place it 
appears.
    (b) Member of an Indian Tribe.--Section 4 of such Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (11);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (12) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) `Member of an Indian tribe' means a person who is on 
        the membership roll (or otherwise considered a member under 
        consistently applied policies and practices) of the Indian 
        tribe and, if over the age of eighteen before first becoming a 
        member of the Indian tribe, became such a member only upon the 
        person's written consent.''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF TRIBAL MEMBERSHIP NOT PERMITTED.

    Section 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 
1911) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) For the purposes of any child custody proceeding involving an 
Indian child, membership in an Indian tribe shall be effective from the 
actual date of admission to membership in the Indian tribe and shall 
not be given retroactive effect.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to any 
child custody proceeding in which a final decree has not been entered 
as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Security Education Board. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VII of Public Law 102-183, as amended.

# DATES:

June 26, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge, Shenandoah Room AB, 1800 North Fort Meyer Drive, Arlington, VA 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Kevin Gormley, Program Officer, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210,                               ( print page 31299)                            Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. Electronic mail address:                         *Gormleyk@nau.edu.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Security Education Board Members meeting is open to public. The public is afforded the opportunity to submit written statements associated with NSEP.

Dated: May 30, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-2803 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 42.09-25 Initial or periodic survey requirements for all vessels. ( a ) Before a survey may be completed, the vessel shall be placed in a drydock or hauled out. The surveyor shall be given complete access to all parts of the vessel to ensure that the vessel complies with all applicable requirements.
( b ) The surveyor shall examine on all vessels the items, etc., listed in this paragraph to determine if in satisfactory condition and meeting applicable requirements in this subchapter. ( 1 ) Cargo hatch coamings, covers, beams and supports, gaskets, clamps, locking bars, tarpaulins, battens, cleats and wedges of hatches on exposed freeboard, quarter and superstructure decks, and elsewhere as may be necessary.
( 2 ) Structure of the vessel, coamings, closures, and all means of protection provided for openings, such as for ventilators, companionways, machinery casings, fiddleys, funnels, enclosed superstructures on the freeboard deck (and their end bulkheads) or equivalent protective deck houses, openings in the freeboard and superstructure decks, and significant openings at higher levels in the vessel.
( 3 ) Transverse watertight subdivision bulkheads, as fitted, including any openings therein and closures for such openings. They shall be examined throughout their vertical and transverse extent.
( 4 ) All air-pipe outlets, their closures, all scuppers, and all sanitary discharges in the vessel's sides, including nonreturn valves installed.
( 5 ) The main and auxiliary sea inlets and discharges in the machinery space, and elsewhere if existent, and the valves and controls for these items.
( 6 ) All gangways, cargo ports, and airports, including dead covers or other similar openings in the vessel's sides and their closures.
( 7 ) All guardrails, bulwarks, gangways, and freeing port shutters, including securing devices, and bars.
( 8 ) All eye plates or similar fittings for timber (or other) deck-cargo lashings, including the lashings, sockets for uprights and protective devices as may be necessary for ventilators and steering arrangements.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10056, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9013, June 5, 1969]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 25, 2008

|Filer                    | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------ | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|KIRKSVILLE BANCORP, INC. | CIC         | Notice by Douglas and Theresa Kelly, Kirksville, Missouri; Ray E. Cahalan Family Trust with Theresa Kelly and Jacquline Niedergerke as co-trustees, Kirksville, Missouri; Gary Kelly, Aspen, Colorado; and William and Kathleen Moffett, Golden, Colorado, as a group acting in concert to retain control of Kirksville Bancorp, Inc., Kirksville, Missouri. | Newspaper:11/10/2008Federal Register:11/04/2008
|Newspaper:               | 11/10/2008 
|Federal Register:        | 11/04/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cr-20313 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

MARCELL WILLIAM SCHOCKO, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On August 24, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on August 24, 

2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 15, is ADOPTED. 

1:15-cr-20313-TLL-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 09/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 75
 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 14, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: September 23, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on September 23, 2015. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20313-TLL-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 09/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 76
§ 34.17-1 Application—T/ALL. ( a ) Where a fixed foam extinguishing system is installed, the provisions of this subpart with the exception of § 34.17-90, shall apply to all installations contracted for on or after January 1, 1962.
( b ) Installations contracted for prior to January 1, 1962, shall meet the requirements of § 34.17-90.
#### FREDERICK E. KOCH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDLAND ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided June 28, 1929.

Before Justices Pakkek, Black and Bodine.

For the plaintiff-respondent, *Feder ■& Rinzler.*

For the defendants-appellants, *Max E. Thiem*and *Mackay & Mackay.*

*590Per Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Third Judicial District Court of Bergen county to recover the sum of $192.50.

The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment of nonsuit, as to the township of Midland, a dismissal of the action as against the board of health, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Frederick E. Koch, for the sum of $175 against the defendant Max H. Thiem. The defendant Max H. Thiem appeals and files four specifications of the determinations, with which he is dissatisfied in point-of law. The basis of the court’s decision, as set out in the state of the case, settled by the court and sent up with the appeal, is as follows: “On July 20th, 1926, the plaintiff and defendant Max H. Thiem talked about the emergency that existed, whereby some three hundred families were without water due to the orders of the state and local boards of health, and at the conversation the defendant told the plaintiff he would be given the same consideration as Augusta Thiem would be given if he would allow his pipes to be donnected with the water supply of Augusta Thiem [which was $1.25 per month]. To this the plaintiff agreed. Albert Snyder, a witness, corroborated the plaintiff’s testimony as to this conversation between the plaintiff and defendant Max H. Thiem. The pipe lines of the plaintiff were connected with the water supply of said Augusta Thiem, and water was supplied by these means to at least seventy houses for two months.”

From this evidence the court concluded there was sufficient evidence to prove that a contract existed between the plaintiff and the defendant Max H. Thiem, whereby the plaintiff agreed to allow his pipes to be used, and that the plaintiff would be paid $1.25 per month, &c. We concur in the conclusion reached by the trial court. This covers all the points involved in the case. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed, with costs. ,
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated Medical
Management, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2005


                                    /s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00557

- CR

Rafael CASTILLO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR2162

Honorable Jennifer Peña

, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 21 , 2024.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice