32308 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 12, 2007 / Notices 

days from the date of receipt to file an 

appeal. 

Parties who do not file an appeal in 

accordance with the requirements of 43 

CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed 

to have waived their rights. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may 

be obtained from: Bureau of Land 

Management, Alaska State Office, 222 

West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 

Alaska 99513–7504. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Bureau of Land Management by phone 

at 907–271–5960, or by e-mail at 

ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov. Persons 

who use a telecommunication device 

(TTD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–

8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a 

week, to contact the Bureau of Land 

Management. 

Kara Marciniec, 

Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication 

II. 

[FR Doc. E7–11283 Filed 6–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[CO–922–07–1310-FI; COC63509] 

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of 

Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed 

reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 

lease. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 

U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 

3108.2–3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM) received a 

petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 

lease COC63509 from Beartooth Oil and 

Gas Company, for lands in Moffat 

County, Colorado. The petition was 

filed on time and was accompanied by 

all the rentals due since the date the 

lease terminated under the law. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bureau of Land Management, Milada 

Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch 

of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 303–

239–3767. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee 

has agreed to the amended lease terms 

for rentals and royalties at rates of 

$10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per 

year and 162⁄3 percent, respectively. The 

lessee has paid the required $500 

administrative fee and $163 to 

reimburse the Department for the cost of 

this Federal Register notice. The lessee 

has met all the requirements for 

reinstatement of the lease as set out in 

Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral 

Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 

188), and the Bureau of Land 

Management is proposing to reinstate 

lease COC63509 effective May 1, 2007, 

under the original terms and conditions 

of the lease and the increased rental and 

royalty rates cited above. 

Dated: June 6, 2007. 

Milada Krasilinec, 

Land Law Examiner. 

[FR Doc. E7–11282 Filed 6–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[NM–952–07–1420–BJ] 

Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; New 

Mexico 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The plats of survey described 

below are scheduled to be officially 

filed in the New Mexico State Office, 

Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe, 

New Mexico, (30) thirty calendar days 

from the date of this publication. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

New Mexico Principal Meridian, New 

Mexico 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and survey for Township 12 North, 

Range 12 East, accepted January 19, 2007, for 

Group 1047 New Mexico. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and survey for Township 13 North, 

Range 14 East, accepted January 29, 2007, for 

Group 1059 New Mexico. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey for Township 7 North, Range 3 East, 

accepted March 12, 2007, for Group 1039 

New Mexico. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and survey for Township 17 North, 

Range 8 East, accepted March 14, 2007, for 

Group 1050 New Mexico. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and survey for Township 17 North 

Range 9, East, accepted March 20, 2007, for 

Group 1058 New Mexico. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and subdivision of sections for 

Township 24 North, Range 9 East, accepted 

March 26, 2007, for Group 998 New Mexico. 

The plat in two sheets representing the 

dependent resurvey and subdivision of 

sections for Township 14 North, Range 18 

West, accepted April 30, 2007, for Group 

1038 New Mexico. 

The plat in representing the dependent 

resurvey and subdivision of sections for 

Township 3 North, Range 6 West, accepted 

March 30, 2007, for Group 1056 New Mexico. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey for Township 16 North, Range 5 

East, accepted May 14, 2007, for Group 1001 

New Mexico. 

The plat in four sheets, representing the 

dependent resurvey and survey for Township 

15 North, Range 6 East, accepted May 14, 

2007, for Group 1001 New Mexico. 

The plat in five sheets, representing the 

dependent resurvey and survey for Township 

15 North, Range 5 East, accepted May 14, 

2007, for Group 1001 New Mexico. 

Indian Meridian, Oklahoma 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and survey for Township 6 North, 

Range 5 West, accepted January 10, 2007, for 

Group 131 Oklahoma. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and subdivisions of sections for 

Township 22 North, Range 1 East, accepted 

March 21, 2007 for Group 141 Oklahoma. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey for Township 6 North, Range 5 

West, accepted January 10, 2007 for Group 

131 Oklahoma. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and subdivision of section 30 for 

Township 2 North, Range 14 West, accepted 

December 27, 2006, for Group 142 Oklahoma. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey and subdivision of sections for 

Township 8 North, Range 6 East, accepted 

February 8, 2007, for Group 108 Oklahoma. 

The supplemental plat of section 3, 

Township 5 South, Range 14 West, accepted 

January 18, 2007, Oklahoma. 

The supplemental plat of sections 4 and 9, 

Township 5 South, Range 14 West, accepted 

January 18, 2007, Oklahoma. 

The plat representing the dependent 

resurvey for Township 21 North, Range 9 

East, accepted September 26, 2006 for Group 

129 Oklahoma. 

The plat in two sheets, representing the 

dependent resurvey and survey for Township 

21 North, Range 8 East, accepted September 

28, 2006 for Group 129 Oklahoma. 

If a protest against a survey, as shown 

on any of the above plats is received 

prior to the date of official filing, the 

filing will be stayed pending 

consideration of the protest. A plat will 

not be officially filed until the day after 

all protests have been dismissed. 

A person or party who wishes to 

protest against any of these surveys 

must file a written protest with the New 

Mexico State Director, Bureau of Land 

Management, stating that they wish to 

protest. 

A statement of reasons for a protest 

may be filed with the notice of protest 

to the State Director, or the statement of 

reasons must be filed with the State 

Director within thirty days after the 

protest is filed. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

These plats will be available for 

inspection in the new Mexico State 

Office, Bureau of Land Management, 

and P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New 

Mexico, 87502–0115. Copies may be 

obtained from this office upon payment 

of $1.10 per sheet. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 12, 2007 / Notices 32309 

Dated: May 31, 2007. 

Robert A. Casias, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor, New Mexico. 

[FR Doc. 07–2896 Filed 6–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–FM–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

for the Marin Headlands-Fort Baker, 

Transportation Infrastructure and 

Management Plan, Golden Gate 

National Recreation Area, Marin 

County, CA; Notice of Availability 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, 42 U.S.C. 

4321–4347, January 1, 1970, as 

amended), and the Council on 

Environmental Quality Regulations (40 

CFR parts 1500 through 1508), the 

National Park Service, Department of 

the Interior, has prepared a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement for the 

Marin Headlands-Fort Baker 

Transportation Infrastructure and 

Management Plan. The project would 

provide greater access to and within the 

Marin Headlands and Fort Baker areas 

for a variety of users in a way that 

minimizes or avoids impacts to the rich 

natural diversity and cultural resources 

of these areas within Golden Gate 

National Recreation Area (GGNRA). 

Roadway infrastructure would be 

rehabilitated or reconstructed with noncharacter altering roadway widening, 

and parking facilities would be 

improved. Additional transit options 

would be provided to and within areas 

to improve access to visitor sites. 

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities would 

be improved through closure and 

rerouting of existing trails and 

construction of new trails. A successful 

project would meet the following goals: 

(1) Promote public transit, pedestrian, 

and bicycle travel to and within GGNRA 

to improve visitor experience and 

enhance environmental quality; (2) 

Rehabilitate the Marin Headlands-Fort 

Baker transportation road and trail 

infrastructure in a manner that protects 

resources and improves safety and 

circulation; (3) Reduce traffic congestion 

at key GGNRA locations and connecting 

roads. 

Proposal and Alternatives: As noted, 

this Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) describes and analyzes 

four alternatives. Alternative 1, the No 

Action Alternative, would not deviate 

from the existing management direction; 

it serves as an environmental baseline 

from which potential effects of the three 

‘‘action’’ alternatives may be compared. 

Alternative 2 would provide basic 

multi-modal access. Roadway 

infrastructure would be rehabilitated 

within the existing roadway width; 

parking facilities would be improved; 

transit service to the Marin Headlands 

would be expanded on weekends; and 

minor pedestrian and bicycle facility 

enhancements would be implemented 

to improve access to these GGNRA 

areas. Alternative 4 would provide 

maximum multi-modal access. Roadway 

infrastructure would be reconstructed 

throughout the study area, and parking 

facilities would be improved. Transit 

options would include the addition of 

connections to regional transit centers 

outside of GGNRA. Extensive pedestrian 

and bicycle facility enhancements 

would be implemented, including 

closure and rerouting of existing trails, 

construction of new trails, and road 

widening to allow for bicycle lane 

construction on nearly all major roads. 

Alternative 3 is the Agency Preferred 

alternative. Alternative 3 would provide 

enhanced multi-modal access. Roadway 

infrastructure would be rehabilitated or 

reconstructed with non-character 

altering roadway widening, and parking 

facilities would be improved. 

Additional transit options would be 

provided to and within the Marin 

Headlands and Fort Baker (MH/FB) 

areas to improve access. Pedestrian and 

bicycle facilities would be improved 

through closure and rerouting of 

existing trails and construction of new 

trails. Key project elements include the 

following: 

Roadways and Vehicular Circulation: 

At selected sites within the area of 

potential effect, roads and intersections 

will be modified to improve safety and 

operations. Modifications include 

widening the road widths from two to 

four feet to allow for the provision of 

Class 2 bicycle lanes or improved safety 

on Class 3 bike routes, and 

reconstructing intersections from a ‘‘Y’’

to a ‘‘T’’ configuration. In addition 

GGNRA would implement a wayfinding 

program and ‘‘intelligent transportation 

system’’ (ITS) technologies to improve 

visitor information and reduce traffic 

congestion at key locations. 

Parking Management and Fees: In 

many MH/FB locations parking areas 

would be reconfigured, delineated, and 

formalized, in order to improve parking 

operations, reduce congestion, better 

match parking supply with demand, 

and reduce natural resource impacts. A 

parking fee program would be 

implemented to provide enhanced 

transit service operations. 

Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements: 

Class 1 bicycle path and Class 2 bicycle 

lanes would be added in several 

locations, and extensive improvements 

to pedestrian trails would be 

implemented. A new bicycle/pedestrian 

trail would be constructed to provide a 

separate facility connecting Fort Baker 

to the bike lanes at Barry-Baker tunnel 

and the Marin Headlands. Rodeo Valley 

Trail would be widened with a 

hardened surface between Capehart 

Housing and Bunker Road at Rodeo 

Lagoon to provide a Class 1 bicycle path 

and hiking trail. The Coastal Trail 

would be rerouted from its current 

interior Rodeo Valley alignment to a 

more coastal alignment with spectacular 

views. 

Transit Services: Existing transit 

services in the MH/FB areas would be 

enhanced to improve access to and 

within these areas. The goal would be 

to provide transit access seven days a 

week by expanding MUNI and Golden 

Gate Transit service on existing routes, 

and by implementing additional park 

shuttle service. 

Car-Free Days and Special Events: A 

program of car-free days would be 

established on selected days on a trial 

basis; after review of the demonstration 

program, GGNRA may adjust the 

number of car-free days or the 

scheduled times and operations. This 

program would allow visitors to 

experience these areas with minimal 

vehicular traffic and would encourage 

visitors to use alternative modes of 

transportation to access and travel 

within GGNRA. 

Natural Resource Enhancements: 

Efforts to protect and enhance natural 

resources would include restoring the 

wetland community at the unpaved 

parking lot at Rodeo Beach; repairing 

gullies that have eroded due to past 

poor drainage along Conzelman 

roadway; and removing fill and 

restoring wetlands along Rodeo Lagoon/ 

Lake on selected portions of Smith and 

Bunker Roads. 

Scoping and Public Involvement: The 

Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS was 

published in the Federal Register on 

April 10, 2002. Early in the EIS scoping 

phase three public meetings were 

hosted in San Francisco, Marin City, 

and Oakland. The San Francisco 

meeting occurred on March 26, 2002 

during a meeting of the GGNRA 

Advisory Committee (approximately ten 

members of the public attended the 

meeting). The Marin City meeting 

occurred on April 10, 2002 at the 

Manzanita Community Center in Marin 

City (approximately 20 members of the 

public attended). The Oakland meeting 

occurred on April 11, 2002 at the 

Metropolitan Transportation 

Commission Auditorium in Oakland. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES