alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 52.25-20 Exhaust gas boilers.

Exhaust gas boilers with a maximum allowable working pressure greater than 103 kPa gage (15 psig) or an operating temperature greater than 454 °C (850 °F) must be designed, constructed, inspected, tested, and stamped in accordance with the applicable provisions in this part. The design temperature of parts exposed to the exhaust gas must be the maximum temperature that could normally be produced by the source of the exhaust gas. This temperature must be verified by testing or by the manufacturer of the engine or other equipment producing the exhaust. Automatic exhaust gas boiler control systems must be designed, constructed, tested, and inspected in accordance with § 63.25-7 of this subchapter.

[CGD 88-057, 55 FR 24236, June 15, 1990]
#### Gordon McKenzie and another, *Respondents, v.*Nicholas H. Decker, *Appellant.*

Judgment modified as directed in opinion. Opinion by

Brady, J.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

                                MGI PHARMA, INC.

                                   (unaudited)

The following information is required in computations of basic and diluted loss
per common share for each period:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                 September 30,                  September 30,
                         ---------------------------    ---------------------------
                             1998           1997            1998           1997
                         ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------
<S>                      <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>          
Net Income (Loss):       $    384,514   $   (136,842)   $    216,592   $ (1,495,425)

Common shares:
  Adjusted weighted
   shares outstanding:
     Basic                 14,452,288     14,135,191      14,330,574     14,108,178

     Assuming dilution     15,019,806     14,135,191      14,847,538     14,108,178

Net Income (Loss) per
  common share:
     Basic               $       0.03   $      (0.01)   $       0.02   $      (0.11)

     Assuming dilution   $       0.03   $      (0.01)   $       0.01   $      (0.11)
</TABLE>
§ 201.73 Joinder of proceedings. ( a ) Two or more matters which have been set for hearing by the Administration, and which involve similar issues, may be consolidated for the purpose of hearing. Such consolidation may, at the discretion of the Administration, or Presiding Officer after hearing has been ordered, be ordered upon petition of any party to said hearing or upon the initiative of the Administration.
( b ) A petition to consolidate shall be filed not later than the first prehearing conference in the proceeding with which consolidation is requested, and shall relate only to then pending applications. If made at such conference, the petition may be oral. A petition which is not timely filed shall be dismissed unless the petitioner shall clearly show good cause for the failure to file said petition on time. A petition which does not relate to an application pending at the time of or before a prehearing conference in a proceeding with which consolidation is requested, shall likewise be dismissed unless the petitioner shall clearly show good cause for a failure to file the application within the prescribed period.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DISTRICT

JENNIFER PELLOW as Personal

Representative of the Estate of Case No: 15-11765

NATHAN WESLEY PELLOW,

Hon. Terrance G. Berg

Plaintiff, Magistrate R. Steven Whalen

v.

KEVIN BARNHILL, SHANE MCKIBBEN,

ROBERT ROY, JOHN ADAMS, and 

DALE VAN HORN, Jointly and Severally,

Defendants.

_________________________________________________________________

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1 Autopsy Report

Exhibit 2 Police Report Excerpts

Exhibit 3 Gill Report

Exhibit 4 Photo of Barnhill

Exhibit 5 Photo of McKibben

Exhibit 6 Photo of Pellow’s back post-mortem

Exhibit 7 Photo of Jacobs

Exhibit 8 Partially redacted Gill Answers to Interrogatories and RTP

Exhibit 9 Declaration of Arthur Gill

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 34-1, PageID.382 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 2
Exhibit 10 Gill Employment Termination

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 34-1, PageID.383 Filed 01/09/17 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending May 23, 2009

|Filer                                                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST GRAYSON BANCSHARES, INC. EMPLOYEE'S STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST | * 3A5         | First Grayson Bancshares, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust and First Grayson Bancshares, Inc., both in McGregor, Texas, to acquire The Roxton Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, McGregor, Texas, and indirectly acquire through merger The Roxton Corporation, McGregor, Texas, and The First Bank, Roxton, Texas, Roxton, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/12/2009
|Newspaper:                                                      | Not available
|Federal Register:                                               | 06/12/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2009 (July 1, 2009 - September 30, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         125,230
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               115,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    208,097
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,263
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,554
<LOANS>                                        884,899
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,030,776<F1>
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,178,296
<SHORT-TERM>                                    87,775
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            275,993
<LONG-TERM>                                    322,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,623
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,017,433<F1>
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 60,737
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,961
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                30,597
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               102,295
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              27,368
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,542
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           58,753
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,650
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 157
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 64,355<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,233
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      28,233
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.33
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,199
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,259
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 8,185
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,424
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,333
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,592
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,127
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,518
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,900
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              1,300
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,318
<FN>
<F1>Difference is minority interest in consolidated subsidiary of $13,343.
<F2>Does not include $1,703 of minority interest in net income of consolidated
subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.7



  
 Exhibit 10.7

  
 February 8, 2005 
  
 Glade M. Knight 
 306 East Main Street 
 Richmond, Virginia 23219 
  

	 	Re:	Amendment to Stock Option Agreement 

  
 Dear Mr. Knight: 
  
 By signing below, you agree that the stock option agreement between you and Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc., dated July 23, 1999 (your
“Stock Option Agreement”), will terminate by means of your exercise of the options granted thereunder or the payment of cash to you pursuant to Section 8(b) in 2005. 
  
 This letter agreement will amend your Stock Option Agreement, a copy of which is annexed for your reference. 
  

			
	 CORNERSTONE REALTY INCOME TRUST, INC.

	
	/s/ Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
	 By:
	 	 Stanley J. Olander, Jr.

	 Title:
	 	 Chief Financial Officer



  

	
	 Accepted and Agreed:

	
	/s/ Glade M. Knight
	Glade M. Knight

  
 Date: February 8, 2005
Order entered December 20, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01118-CV

LV HIGHLAND CREDIT FEEDER FUND LLC, ET AL., Appellants

V.

HIGHLAND CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND, LP, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-08521

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ December 18, 2013 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a brief. Appellants shall file their brief on or before January 15, 2014.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11
                 NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         2005         2004
                                     ------------  -----------
           <S>                       <C>           <C>
           Net loss                  $  (997,616)  (1,558,083)
                                     ============  ===========

           Weighted average number
             of common shares
             outstanding              90,899,581   75,116,717

           Common equivalent shares
             representing shares
             issuable upon exercise
             of outstanding options
             and warrants                      -            -
                                     ------------  -----------
                                      90,899,581   75,116,717
                                     ============  ===========

           Net loss per share,
             basic and diluted
           Loss from continuing
             operations              $     (0.01)       (0.03)
                                     ============  ===========
           Income from discontinued
             operations                        -         0.01
                                     ============  ===========
           Net loss per share,
             basic and diluted       $     (0.01)       (0.02)
                                     ============  ===========
</TABLE>




Stock  options,  warrants  and convertible preferred stock are not considered in
the  calculations  for  those  periods  with  net  losses  as  the impact of the
potential  common  shares  (approximately  at  76,181,777  June  30,  2005  and
77,381,877  shares  at  June  30, 2004) would be to decrease net loss per share.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 (consolidated with Case No. 15-11624) 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. et al.

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER REQURING THE PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION 

SESSIONS WITH THE HONORABLE GERALD E. ROSEN 

 In this action, the parties have previously attended mediation sessions with 

the Honorable Gerald E. Rosen (Ret.), the former Chief Judge of this Court. The 

Court concludes that additional mediation sessions with Judge Rosen could be 

valuable in helping the parties settle this action. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HREBY ORDERED that the parties shall attend 

additional mediation sessions with the Honorable Gerald E. Rosen. The format, 

dates, and total number of mediation sessions shall be determined by Judge Rosen 

at his discretion (after consultation with the parties). The parties shall have 

appropriate business representative(s) with full settlement authority attend each 

mediation session. Finally, the participants in each mediation session shall be 
2 

approved in advance by Judge Rosen, after consultation with the parties, to ensure 

that appropriate representatives with full settlement authority attend each session. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 18, 2019 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on March 18, 2019, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
```

[House Report 107-98]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-98

======================================================================

 
     PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2052, THE SUDAN PEACE ACT

                                _______
                                

   June 12, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 162]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 162, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  Summary of Provisions of Resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2052, the 
Sudan Peace Act, under an open rule. The rule provides one hour 
of general debate divided equally between the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on International 
Relations.
    The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring three-
day availability of the committee report) against consideration 
of the bill, and provides that the bill shall be open to 
amendment by section.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the 
Congressional Record prior to their consideration may be 
accorded priority in recognition to offer their amendments if 
otherwise consistent with House rules. Finally, the rule 
provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                

```
§ 4.01-3 Reporting exclusion. ( a ) Vessels subject to 33 CFR 173.51 are excluded from the requirements of subpart 4.05.
( b ) Vessels which report diving accidents under 46 CFR 197.484 regarding deaths, or injuries which cause incapacitation for greater than 72 hours, are not required to give notice under § 4.05-1(a)(5) or § 4.05-1(a)(6).
( c ) Vessels are excluded from the requirements of § 4.05-1(a)(5) and (a)(6) with respect to the death or injury of shipyard or harbor workers when such accidents are not the result of either a vessel casualty (e.g., collision) or a vessel equipment casualty (e.g., cargo boom failure) and are subject to the reporting requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR 1904.
( d ) Except as provided in subpart 4.40, public vessels are excluded from the requirements of this part.
[CGD 76-170, 45 FR 77441, Nov. 24, 1980; 46 FR 19235, Mar. 30, 1981, as amended by CGD 76-170, 47 FR 39684, Sept. 9, 1982; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51195, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58458, Sept. 29, 2000]
Exhibit 10.3
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
LOAN AGREEMENT
 dated as of January 14, 2008,
 between
 US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.,
as Borrower
 and
 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent




---



##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LOAN AGREEMENT
 Borrower Citicorp Administrative Agent
 Loan Agreement
    ARTICLE I
 DEFINITIONS
 Definitions
 ARTICLE II
 AMENDMENTS TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT
 Exhibits
 ARTICLE III
 REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES
 Representations and Warranties




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 EFFECTIVENESS
 Effectiveness
 ARTICLE V
 MISCELLANEOUS
 Miscellaneous
   2




---



##### 



US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Thomas T. WeirName:
    Thomas T. WeirTitle:
    Vice President and Treasurer CITICORP NORTH AMERICA INC.
 By:
    /s/ William WashburnName:
    William WashburnTitle Director/Vice President  3
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interlink Electronics, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 033-93066, 333-39371, 333-53870 and 333-107174) on Form S-8and the registration statement (No. 333-112034) on Form S-3 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Interlink Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc.

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

June 1, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1366

DARRYL E. WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. TOWN OF ZEBULON; TOWN OF ZEBULON POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROBERT MATHENY; TIM HAYWORTH; MICHAEL MCGLOTHLIN; SCOTT FINCH, Defendants - Appellees,

and JOHN DOE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:06-cv-00218-BO)

Submitted: January 27, 2009 Decided: February 6, 2009

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Newell Gray, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Victoria A. Street, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: Darryl E. Wright appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2000), and North Carolina state law. This court reviews a district court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, drawing reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Doe v. Kidd , 501 F.3d 348, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), cert. denied , 128 S. Ct. 1483 (2008). Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); see Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Wright v. Town of Zebulon , No. 4:06-cv-00218-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Communication Disorders Review Committee, June 21, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 
22, 2007, 5 p.m., Wyndham Hotel, 101 W. Fayette Street, Baltimore, MD 
21202 which was published in the Federal Register on May 4, 2007, 72 FR 
25323.
    The meeting will be held June 20-21, 2007. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: May 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2615 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
98-2007.

#### Mortemore v. State.

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., not participating.
§ 503.87 Effect of provisions of this subpart on other subparts. ( a ) Nothing in this subpart shall limit or expand the ability of any person to seek access to agency records under subpart D (§§ 503.31 to 503.36) of this part except that the exceptions of § 503.86 shall govern requests to copy or inspect any portion of any transcript, electronic recordings or minutes required to be kept under this subpart.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart shall permit the withholding from any individual to whom a record pertains any record required by this subpart to be maintained by the agency which record is otherwise available to such an individual under the provisions of subpart H of this part.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984; 49 FR 47395, Dec. 4, 1984, as amended at 80 FR 52641, Sept. 1, 2015]