alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014261EN.01002301.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2014 — Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian v OHIM — Gulbenkian (GULBENKIAN)

(Case T-541/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark GULBENKIAN - Earlier well-known national mark, company name and national logos Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian - Relative grounds for refusal - Evidence of the existence of the earlier rights - Article 8(1)(b), (4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure))

2014/C 261/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, P. López Ronda and G. Macias Bonilla, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Micael Gulbenkian (Oeiras, Portugal) (represented by: J. Pimenta and A. Sebastião, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 July 2011 (Case R 1436/2010-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian and Mr Micael Gulbenkian.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian to pay the costs;

| 3) | Orders Mr Micael Gulbenkian to refund to the Court of Justice of the European Union the sum of EUR 1  807,48 in accordance with Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders Mr Micael Gulbenkian to refund to the Court of Justice of the European Union the sum of EUR 1  807,48 in accordance with Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.

1

---
#### §§ 507.104-507.109 [Reserved]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending January 3, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00043-CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

Allen Sena, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-GN-17-006148, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

We abate this cause pending the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of EBS 

Solutions, Inc. v. Hegar, No. 18-0503, on petition for review of this Court’s opinion in Hegar v. 

EBS Solutions, Inc., 549 S.W.3d 849 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018, pet. filed) (en banc). We direct 

appellants to notify this Court of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision by filing a letter with this 

Court within 30 days of that decision becoming final, though appellee may so inform the Court 

and the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

Upon reinstatement of the appeal, this Court will permit briefs, if needed,

addressing the effect of the supreme court’s decision in EBS according to the following schedule:

appellants’ supplemental brief will be due thirty days after the reinstatement, appellee’s 

supplemental brief will be due thirty days after the date on which appellants file their
2

supplemental brief, and appellants’ supplemental reply brief (if any) will be due twenty days 

after the date on which appellee files its supplemental brief. These supplemental briefs must not 

exceed 7,500 words if computer generated, and 25 pages if not. A party who perceives the need 

for additional brief length may request an expansion of its limits through established procedures. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i).

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Kelly

Abated

Filed: February 22, 2019
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending April 18, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### National Institute of Corrections

*Time and Date:*                     9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Monday, June 1, 2007, 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 12, 2007.                

*Place:*                     National Correctional, Training Academy & Information Center, 791 Chambers Road, Aurora, Colorado 80011, Tel: 303-365-4450.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

*Matters To Be Considered:*                     Tour of the new Academy & Information Center in Aurora, Colorado; Live Demonstration of Distance Learning; meeting the New Deputy Director Thomas Beauclair; Norval Morris Project; Agency Reports; Quarterly Report by Office of Justice Programs; U.S. Parole Commission; American Corrections Association; Federal Judicial Center.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Thomas Beauclair, Deputy Director, 202-307-3106, ext. 44254.                

Morris L. Thigpen,

Director.

[FR Doc. 07-2660 Filed 5-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
#### §§ 507.112-507.129 [Reserved]
Preliminary Regulatory Determinations 3 Nitrosamines References
Exhibit 28.3

                                     FORM 15


        Telco Communications, Inc. December 31, 1997 Form 10-KSB Page 23

<PAGE>


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 15

Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration under Section 12(g) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Suspension of Duty to File Reports Under
Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Commission File Number: 33-1933 3-D

Telco Communications, Inc. formerly  Cody Capital Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

4 Normandy Drive, Kenner LA 70065            (504) 466-7004
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant's principal executive offices)

Common Stock
(Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)

None
(Titles of all other classes of securities for which a duty to file reports
under section 13(a) or 15(d) remains)

Please place an X in the box(es) to designate the appropriate rule provision(s)
relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to file reports:

Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii)  [X]

Approximate  number of holders of record as of the certification or notice date:
268


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Name of
registrant as specified in charter) has caused this certification/notice to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.


DATE: January 27, 1998                                 BY:              /S/
                                                               William Stocker
                                                          special counsel


        Telco Communications, Inc. December 31, 1997 Form 10-KSB         Page 24
#### MARY WELCH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JOHN R. HOUGHTON ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided May 7, 1929.

Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.

Por the rule, *John A. Ijaird.*

*Contra, Arthur. C. Mullen.*

*501Pee Curiam.

This is a negligence action in which the plaintiffs below have verdicts as follows: Mary Welch, $1,200; Harry Welch, $300; Minnie Hiss, $5,000; John M. Hiss, for personal injuries, $200; for loss of services of his wife, $300, and for expenses for effecting a cure of his wile, &c., $1,000.

The single reason urged against these verdicts is that they are excessive and that they are not justified and warranted by the proofs.

We have reached a contrary conclusion and the rule to show cause will be discharged, with costs.
#### § 50.20-10 [Reserved]
#### Amos D. Fuller, *Respondent, v.*Tunis V. Collins, *Appellant*.

Judgment and order affirmed with costs.
Order filed February 28, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00478-CR

NO. 14-16-00479-CR

____________

MIGUEL ANGEL SAENZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 14CR3080 & 14CR3117

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire 

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); 

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 405th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before March 14, 2017; that the 
clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant 

is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that 

date.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.076-25 Approval testing. ( a ) To obtain approval of an inflatable PFD design, approval tests specified in UL 1180 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.076-11) and this section must be conducted or supervised by a recognized laboratory using PFDs that have been constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application for approval.
( b ) Each PFD design must pass the tests required by UL 1180 and this section.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Each PFD design must be visually examined for compliance with the construction and performance requirements of §§ 160.076-21 and 160.076-23 and UL 1180 and UL 1191 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.076-11).
( e ) *Additional tests.* The Commandant may prescribe additional tests for approval of novel or unique designs.
[CGD 94-110, 60 FR 32848, June 23, 1995, as amended by CGD 94-110, 61 FR 13946, Mar. 28, 1996; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58463, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2011-0076, 77 FR 19942, Apr. 3, 2012; USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56500, Sept. 22, 2014]
#### § 205.4 Finality of decisions.

The Administrator's decision will be the final administrative action on all audit appeals.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 111 (Monday, June 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 32129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Environmental Health Sciences Review 
Committee.
    Date: July 11-13, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Radisson Governor's Inn, I-40 at Davis Drive, Exit 
280, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Nat'l Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-24, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 
541-1307.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIFHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 31, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2877 Filed 6-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Robert H. Crandall. *Appellant, v.*The Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of the Town of Boonville, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 550.506 Enforcement of orders.

In proceedings under this part, when a person violates an order of the Commission or fails to comply with a subpoena, the Commission may seek enforcement by a United States district court having jurisdiction over the parties.
#### Cleveland Bar Association *v.*Rollins.

[Cite as *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Rollins*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 408.]

(No. 98-1307

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided January 27, 1999.)

*410
      *Daniel*W. *Hammer*and *Kevin M Magnuson,*for relator.

*J. Michael Drain,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam..*

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Neglect of legal matters and a failure to cooperate in the ensuing investigation have generally warranted an indefinite suspension. *Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 683 N.E.2d 1148, and cases cited therein; *Akron Bar Assn. v. Barnett*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 269, 685 N.E.2d 1230; *Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 100, 694 N.E.2d 899. In this case, mindful of the fact that respondent’s clients suffered little, if any, damage, we adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year.

Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

*411Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I would impose the sanction of indefinite suspension based on the recommendation of the relator.

As the board reported, “there is a pattern here of a total lapse of professional conduct. In each instance, there is an abdication of responsibility, and in each instance according to the Respondent, the fault always lay with someone or something else. The Panel, after a thorough review * * *, found reference after reference of carefully worded statements made by the Respondent confessing and/or avoiding his responsibility. The Panel was impressed with the elocution, but not impressed with the substance. * * * The Respondent’s statements in mitigation are at best lame excuses rather than valid reasons.”

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1600 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1600

             For the relief of Robert and Dorothy Shickle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 1995

   Mr. Wise introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of Robert and Dorothy Shickle.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM LIABILITY FOR ACCRUED INTEREST.

    Robert and Dorothy Shickle of Martinsburg, West Virginia, are 
relieved of liability to the United States for interest accrued on 
unpaid Federal income taxes for the taxable years ending December 31, 
1989 and December 31, 1990.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains financial information extracted from Columbia
Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety by references to such
financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,021,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,114<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,486,401<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,486,401<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,215,172<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               674,821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                540,351
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            540,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   540,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $28,295 and due from DWR of
$6,819.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $429,405.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $68,911, accrued brokerage
commissions of $15,597, accrued management fees of $27,897, administrative
expenses payable of $72,652 and accrued transaction fees and costs of
$1,239.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $888,100, net change
in unrealized of $63,429 and interest income of $263,643.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
wndm_ex101.htm



Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Amendment A


 







to


 







Manufacturer Exclusive Distributor Agreement


 







Between Wound Care Innovations, LLC and Academy Medical, LLC


 


Dated June, 2013


 



























Notwithstanding any other provisions in the above titled Agreement, Section 2.B is hereby amended to permit the resale of Products (as defined in Exhibit A of said Agreement) to Opus Health Solutions, Costa Mesa, CA for resale to any sovereign Indian Nation sited in the United States of America.


 







In Witness Whereof, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated by the signatures below.


 












Academy Medical, LLC


 


By: /s/ David Spinola


 


Printed: David Spinola


 


Title: Chief Financial Officer


 


Date: 8/7/2013


 







 


Wound Care Innovations, LLC


 







 


By:/s/ Robert H. Lutz, Jr.


 


Printed: Robert H. Lutz, Jr.


 


Title: Chief Executive Officer


 


Date: 8/6/2013