alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                               <C>                      <C>           <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS               RESTATED         RESTATED
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998      DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1998      MAR-31-1997       MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                68,367           62,345            49,869
<SECURITIES>                               0                0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                        366,759          337,441           271,811
<ALLOWANCES>                           4,295            4,831             4,719
<INVENTORY>                                0                0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     438,305          401,586           321,308
<PP&E>                               124,543          114,485            99,662
<DEPRECIATION>                        60,912           54,626            45,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       642,461          582,847           480,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                302,332          295,415           240,542
<BONDS>                               30,925           14,969            82,826
<COMMON>                                 348              342               279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                0                0                 0
<OTHER-SE>                           334,300          283,057           166,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         642,461          582,847           480,925
<SALES>                                    0                0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     372,376          351,155           294,787
<CGS>                                      0                0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        254,523          238,724           201,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      67,126           64,126            52,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         403              360               290
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       324              383             1,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       15,568           13,773            10,077
<INCOME-TAX>                           5,838            5,234             3,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    9,730            8,539             6,147
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0                0                 0
<CHANGES>                                  0                0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           9,730            8,539             6,147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .28              .25               .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .28              .25               .21
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Stephanie Zoanni v. Lamuel David Hogan

Appellate case number: 01-17-00394-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-34811

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

This appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution on May 1, 2018 for failure to file 

appellant’s brief. On May 16, 2018, appellant’s counsel filed a motion for rehearing, asking the 

court to grant rehearing and reinstate the appeal. Counsel claimed that he would be filing the 

brief, but no brief was tendered with the motion.

If appellant’s brief is tendered, the court will consider granting rehearing. Accordingly, 

we request a response from appellee to the motion for rehearing filed on May 16, 2018. The 

response is due within 15 days of the date of this order. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jennifer Caughey

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 22, 2018
Order filed September 15, 2017

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-17-00252-CV

__________

MARK ADAMS; WATERLOO MEDICAL LABS, LLC; ASHTON 

KOUZBARI; AND STRATEGIC MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC, 

Appellants

V.

LANDON NORTHCUTT; DIVERSIFIED SALES, LLC; STAR 

HOSPITAL SOLUTIONS, LLC; AND GO NET, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV34582

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal from two orders in which the trial court granted a 

temporary injunction without notice to Appellants, Appellants have filed in this court 

an emergency motion. In their motion, Appellants ask that we dissolve or stay the
2

two orders issued by the trial court and also that we stay all proceedings below. We 

grant the motion in part.

We note that the trial court’s orders are not merely temporary restraining 

orders, but are temporary injunctions. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 680, 681. “No temporary 

injunction shall be issued without notice to the adverse party.” TEX. R. CIV. P. 681. 

We also note that a hearing is scheduled to be held in the trial court on September 18, 

2017, and that two of the trial court’s stated purposes for the hearing are (1) to 

determine whether a temporary injunction should be granted and (2) to rule on 

Appellants’ motion to reconsider and to dissolve the temporary injunction. We 

express no opinion regarding the merits of Appellees’ request for a temporary 

injunction; however, we note that Rule 29.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure provides that we may, in this accelerated appeal, review any “further 

appealable interlocutory order concerning the same subject matter.”

We grant Appellants’ emergency motion with respect to Appellants’ request

to stay the injunctive orders issued by the trial court on August 25, 2017, and 

September 8, 2017. The emergency motion is denied with respect to Appellants’ 

request to stay all proceedings in the trial court. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE 

ANN. § 51.014(a)(4), (b) (West Supp. 2016); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 29.1.

PER CURIAM

September 15, 2017

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
EXHIBIT 99.8

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
Cameco Corporation

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:



| |  | our auditors report dated February 8, 2012 on the consolidated financial statements of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation),
which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for
the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information,
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 8, 2012 in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 8, 2012 on the Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2011,
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

each of which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Corporation
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, and registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Saskatoon, Canada

February 24, 2012
§ 298.25 Excess interest or other consideration. We shall not execute Guarantees if any agreement in the Documentation directly or indirectly provides for: ( a ) The payment to an Obligee of interest, or other compensation for services which have not been performed, in a manner that such compensation or payment is being provided as interest in excess of the rate approved by us; or
( b ) Grants of security to an Obligee in addition to the Guarantees.
clA^a 

Commerce and Industry Association of New Jersey 

South 61 Paramus Road, Macl<-Cali Centre IV, Paramus, New Jersey 07652 

201-368-2100 Fax 201-368-3438 www.cianj.org 

ACTIO N 

SI 0-1^00225-060 

CONTROL NO. 

—^-j 

J __ , 

' 7 ' ' i 

CD CD 

February 17,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation ••" ' ~ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Ailocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I support the Continental Airlines application to provide daily nonstop service between New York/Newark and Tokyo 

Haneda airport. New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to begin later this year, is made possible by the wide 

ranging open skies agreement with Japan achieved by your Department. I applaud your efforts on the historic open 

skies agreement and now urge you to select Continental to provide service connecting the U.S.'s financial and 

commercial center at New York/Newark with Tokyo's central/downtown airport. 

Liberty - Haneda service would provide a critical link between two of the world's largest economies and will help boost 

trade and commerce across the New York/Newark region and secondarily across the entire northeastern region of the 

U.S. Liberty airport is sun-ounded by the largest population per square mile in the country, which includes millions of 

Asian Americans. Additionally, recent studies show that for every flight added by Continental in the New York/Newari( 

region, the local economy benefits as employment is sustained, regional incomes are enhanced and trade expands. 

As Continental operates the only tme hub in the region that connects New York/Newari< and much of the U.S. to the 

worid. Continental is the right choice for new Haneda service as communities across the entire eastern U.S. will gain 

access to Haneda via connections at Liberty. Additionally, Continental Airiines has set itself apart as a strong airiine with 

a commitment to safety and excellence for customers. No doubt this should be taken into account when awarding any 

route to Haneda. 

Continental Airiines is committed to the Asian region and to nonstop Tokyo Haneda service. The New York/Newari< 

economy, millions of Americans on the U.S. east coast, the airiine's thousands of employees and hundreds of thousands 

of U.S. consumers will benefit from Continental's proposed service and will work together to make Liberty International 

Airport - Haneda service a real success. 

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda rights to Continental Airiines and my region of the U.S. 

Regards, 

/ y John Galandak, President 

He\N Jersey's business advocate for over 80 years.
§ 53.01-1 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters at: Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593-7509; phone (202) 372-1375; email *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov*. The material may be obtained from the following sources: ( a ) *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),* Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990; 800-843-2763; *CustomerCare@asme.org ;* *www.asme.org*. ( 1 ) ASME BPVC.I-2019, 2019 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section I, Rules for Construction of Power Boilers, 2019 Edition, issued July 1, 2019 (“Section I of the ASME BPVC”); IBR approved for § 53.01-10(e).
( 2 ) ASME BPVC.IV-2019, 2019 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IV, Rules for Construction of Heating Boilers, 2019 Edition, issued July 1, 2019 (“Section IV of the ASME BPVC”); IBR approved for §§ 53.01-3; 53.01-5; 53.01-10(a); 53.05-1(a); 53.05-2(a); 53.05-3; 53.05-5; 53.10-1; 53.10-3(a); 53.10-10; 53.10-15; 53.12-1(a).
( b ) *UL Solutions,* 333 Pfingston Road, Northbrook, IL 60062; 847-272-8800; *www.ul.com*. ( 1 ) UL 174, Standard for Safety, Household Electric Storage Tank Water Heaters, Eleventh Edition, dated April 29, 2004, including revisions through December 15, 2016 (“UL 174”); IBR approved for § 53.01-10(c).
( 2 ) UL 1453, Standard for Safety, Electric Booster and Commercial Storage Tank Water Heaters, Sixth Edition, dated March 29, 2016, including revisions through March 9, 2017 (“UL 1453”); IBR approved for § 53.01-10(c).
[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65163, Oct. 31, 2008, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49228, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59777, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60147, Sept. 30, 2013]
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2.08 OF THE VIRTUAL OPEN NETWORK ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION
1996 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN

      FURTHER   RESOLVED,   that  Section  2.08  of  the  Virtual  Open  Network
Environment  Corporation 1996 Incentive Stock Plan be, and it hereby is, amended
to read in its entirety as follows:

      COMMITTEE means a committee of the Board as may be appointed, from time to
      time, by the Board.  The Board may, from time to time,  appoint members of
      the  Committee  in  substitution  for those  members  who were  previously
      appointed and may fill vacancies,  however caused,  in the Committee.  The
      Committee shall be composed of at least two directors of the Company, each
      of whom  is a  "non-employee  director"  as  defined  in  Rule  16b-3,  as
      promulgated  by the SEC under the Exchange Act, and an "outside  director"
      within the meaning of Section  162(m).  The Committee shall have the power
      and authority to administer  the Plan in accordance  with Article III. If,
      however,   at  least  two  of  the   Company's   directors  are  not  both
      "non-employee  directors"  and  "outside  directors,"  the  Plan  shall be
      administered  by the Board and the term  "Committee"  as used herein shall
      mean the Board.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") by American Medical Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.





/s/ Richard RalloRichard RalloChief
      Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American
Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending October 14, 2006

----

Bank Holding CompaniesGrupo Financiero Banorte, S.A. de C.V., Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A., Institucion de Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero Banorte, and Banorte USA Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware  -- to become bank holding companies and to acquire 70 percent of the shares of INB Financial Corp., McAllen, Texas, and thereby acquire control of its subsidiaries, INB Delaware Corp., Wilmington, Delaware, and Inter National Bank, McAllen, Texas; and elections by Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Banorte, Banorte USA Corporation, INB Financial Corp., and INB Delaware Corp. to become financial holding companies.					-Approved, October 13, 2006 					National City Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio  -- to acquire Harbor Florida Bancshares, Inc., Fort Pierce, Florida, and its subsidiaries, Harbor Federal Savings Bank and Appraisal Analysis, Inc., and thereby engage in appraisal services for real estate and personal property.					-Approved, October 13, 2006 					

EnforcementGold Bank, Leawood, Kansas  -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of civil money penalty against John Price, a former senior vice president.					-Announced, October 12, 2006 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulation D  -- final rule implementing the annual adjustment of the low reserve tranche, reserve requirement exemption amount, deposit reporting cutoff level, and reduced reporting limit for 2007 (Docket No. R-1268).					-Approved, October 10, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: October 19, 2006
SUPREME COURT.

#### State of Tennessee agt. Theodore M. Davis *et al.*

*Special Term¿*

*February*1874.

*Power of a president and cashier of a bank to pledge its assets.*

Although a cashier and a president of a bank may, in the ordinary course of business, without the action of the board of directors, dispose of the negotiable securities of the bank, yet they have not.the power to pledge its assets for the payment of an antecedent debt. •

Van Brunt, J.

No cause of action has been made out against the defendants Fairbanks, Hatch and Chittenden, and the complaint must be dismissed as to them.

The defendant Davis is undoubtedly liable to account for the proceeds of all collaterals which he undertook to collect and apply to the payment of the plaintiff’s claim, and this is founded upon the fact that he received these assets and voluntarily assumed their collection, and he thereby made himself the agent of the bank of Memphis.

But as to the money paid by the estate of Lowenthal, I think a different rule must prevail. Davis received that money as agent of the Bank of the Metropolis, although he knew that the claim against the Lowenthal estate had been attempted to be assigned to the Bank of Memphis by the cashier of the Bank of the Metropolis at the time he received this money. Although a cashier and president of a bank may, in the ordinary course of business, without the action of the board of directors, dispose.of the negotiable securities of a bank, yet they have not the power to pledge its assets *448for the payment of an antecedent debt. This is entirely beyond the scope of the duties of a cashier, as he might, by this means, dispose of all the assets of the corporation, thus usurping powers which the board of directors alone can exercise *(Hoyt*agt. Thompson, 5 *Seld.,*320). Hutchinson, the cashier, therefore, had no power to make the pledge he did to the bank of Memphis, and those securities which came into Davis’ hands as agent for the Bank of the Metropolis, he had a right to regard as though there never had been any attempt to pledge them, the attempted pledge being void.

Judgment must therefore be rendered in favor of defendants Fairbanks, Hatch and Chittenden, and against defendant Davis, for those securities which he received and agreed to collect and account for to the Bank of Memphis.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, March 9, 1995 (41), Para 41.33 Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions]
[Page 364]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.41.33  reports of committees on public bills and resolutions

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

       Mr. YOUNG of Alaska: Committee on Resources. H.R. 402. A 
     bill to amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, and 
     for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-73). Referred to the 
     Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 3, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us