alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Zila, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley C. Anderson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Bradley C. Anderson
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT.

#### George M. Olcott, assignee, agt. John George Maclean *et al.*

*Barikrwpi—foreign creditor.*

A bankrupt cannot prefer a foreign creditor in violation of the provisions of the United States bankrupt act.

*Special*Term,

February, 1874.

Van Bbunt, *J.*

— There is no doubt that the bankrupt laws do not operate beyond the limits of the United States, but the question raised by the demurrer in this case is, can a bankrupt in the United States, in fraud of its provisions in the United States, transfer property to an alien creditor. It makes no difference in this proposition that the contract of purchase was made abroad and to be performed abroad, because the goods had been delivered to the bankrupt and they were his property, and in the United States, and as much so as if he had paid for them. There was no way in which the defendants could have recovered these goods from the bankrupt, because he had not paid for them, if he had .not chosen to part with them. Therefore the proposition is, can a bankrupt prefer a foreign creditor in violation of the provisions the bankrupt act ? I do not think that such a doctrine can be sustained. If the courts of this country obtain jurisdiction of the foreign creditor, they may make him amenable to our laws. The bankrupt law could not be enforced as to an alien beyond the territorial limits of the United States, but for a violation of its provisions within the *456United States; if the courts obtain jurisdiction of the violators of the law, they may enforce its provisions, although they be aliens.

The act complained of was done in the United States, the parties infringing the provisions of the law are brought to answer before a court in the United States, and for all transactions in the United States they, although aliens, are amenable to its laws.

The case of *Cook*agt. Whipple, in the court of appeals, seems to hold that state courts have the power to enforce these provisions of the bankrupt act.

The demurrer must be sustained. Defendants may amend answer on payment of costs.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 12, 2005

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Congressional Bancshares, Inc. | 3A1            | Congressional Bancshares, Inc., Potomac, Maryland, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of Congressional Bank, Potomac, Maryland. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6518 GLADSTONE NEYSMITH, a/k/a Fitzroy G. Blake, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-706) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glads tone Neysmith, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberley Ann Whittle, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Neysmith v. Angelone , No. CA-96-706 (E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ELAINA THOMAS, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11165 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF #1) AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF #2) 

AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (ECF #3) AS MOOT 

 In this action, Plaintiff Elaina Thomas, proceeding pro se, alleges that the 

Michigan Department of Human Services “is illegally removing innocent children prior 

to going to court, using pre-stamp[ed] court order[s].” (See the “Complaint,” ECF #1 at 

1.) Plaintiff has filed numerous lawsuits in this District, all of which have been dismissed 

as frivolous and/or for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Thomas v. 

Havenwyck Hosp., No. 12-14693, 2012 WL 5438951 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012); Thomas 

v. Kingswood Hosp., No. 12-14695, 2012 WL 5447971 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012); 

Thomas v. Bibbs, No. 12-14545, Dkt. #3 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012); Thomas v. Reeder, 

No. 12-14744, Dkt. #3 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 6, 2012); Thomas v. Plymouth Educ. Ctr., No. 

12-14689, Dkt. #3 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2012). See also Thomas v. Dept. of Human Svcs., 

No. 14-50840, Dkt. #2 (E.D. Mich. June 27, 2014) (noting that all of Plaintiff’s prior 

complaints in this Court have been dismissed). 

2:15-cv-11165-MFL-DRG Doc # 6 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 127
2 

Like her prior complaints, this action appears to be frivolous. Nonetheless, the 

Court declines to address the merits of Plaintiff’s claim because Plaintiff is enjoined from 

filing any pleadings in this Court without first obtaining leave. See Thomas v. Bailey, 

No. 12-14558, Dkt. #9 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012) (Friedman, J.) (“Elaina Thomas is 

enjoined from filing any further correspondence or pleadings ... without first obtaining 

permission from this Court and providing proof of permission to the Clerk of the 

Court.”). Plaintiff did not obtain the Court’s permission to file her Complaint. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF #1) is 

DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed 

In Forma Pauperis (ECF #2) Application for Appointment of Counsel (ECF #3) are 

DENIED AS MOOT. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 1, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or 

counsel of record on May 1, 2015, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-11165-MFL-DRG Doc # 6 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 128
EXHIBIT 32.2  UNITED
PAN-EUROPE COMMUNICATIONS N.V.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of
United Pan-Europe Communications N.V. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), we, John F. Riordan and Charles H.R.
Bracken, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, each certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:  (1)The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   August
14, 2003  By:
  /s/ Charles H.R. BrackenCharles H.R. BrackenChief Financial Officer
fs1a1ex10iv_quartet.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 


 



QUARTET MERGER CORP.


777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor


New York, New York 10017







_______________, 2013












Crescendo Advisors II, LLC


777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor


New York, New York 10017







Ladies and Gentlemen:







This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Quartet Merger Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Crescendo Advisors II, LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10017 (or any successor location).  In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Crescendo Advisors II, LLC the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.  Crescendo Advisors II, LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 




	 	 
Very truly yours,







QUARTET MERGER CORP.


	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:









 




	 
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:







CRESCENDO ADVISORS II, LLC

	 
	 	 	 
	
By: 

	 	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:
§ 502.407 Authority of the arbitrator. An arbitrator to whom a dispute is referred may— ( a ) Regulate the course of and conduct arbitral hearings;
( b ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( c ) Compel the attendance of witnesses and production of evidence at the hearing under the provisions of 9 U.S.C. 7 only to the extent the Commission is otherwise authorized by law to do so; and
( d ) Make awards.
# C_2013225EN.01005904.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/59

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Paris — France) — Société Reggiani SpA Illuminazione v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

(Case C-618/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/130

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending July 4, 2009

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------ | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|VAN FINANCIAL CORP | * 3A1         | Van Financial Corp., Breda, Iowa, to become a bank holding company by acquiring at least 80 percent of Breda Savings Bank, Breda, Iowa. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/10/2009
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | 07/10/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending February 3, 2007

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|CUMBERLAND VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC            | Notice by Jerry D. Greer to gain control of Cumberland Valley Financial Corporation, London, Kentucky, and indirectly gain control of Cumberland Valley National Bank & Trust                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                              | Not available 
|Federal Register:                       | Not available 
|FIRST NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION    | CIC            | Notice by Jerry D. Greer and Garth Rex Greer to gain control of, First National Financial Corporation, Manchester, Kentucky, and indirectly gain control of First National Bank, Manchester, Kentucky | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                              | Not available 
|Federal Register:                       | Not available 
|STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, THE       | * 18C* Branch  | Application by The State Bank and Trust Company, Defiance, OH to merge with The Exchange Bank, Luckey, OH pursuant to Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.                             | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                              | Not available 
|Federal Register:                       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 64.45 Securing devices. An MPT or its framework must have sufficient number of positive action securing devices, including hooks, lugs, or padeyes, to attach the unit to the vessel so that— ( a ) The stress does not exceed the standard contained in § 64.15; and
( b ) Additional lashing is not needed.
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 1 of 22 Pg ID 66
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 2 of 22 Pg ID 67
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 3 of 22 Pg ID 68
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 4 of 22 Pg ID 69
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 5 of 22 Pg ID 70
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 6 of 22 Pg ID 71
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 7 of 22 Pg ID 72
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 8 of 22 Pg ID 73
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 9 of 22 Pg ID 74
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 10 of 22 Pg ID 75
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 11 of 22 Pg ID 76
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 12 of 22 Pg ID 77
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 13 of 22 Pg ID 78
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 14 of 22 Pg ID 79
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 15 of 22 Pg ID 80
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 16 of 22 Pg ID 81
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 17 of 22 Pg ID 82
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 18 of 22 Pg ID 83
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 19 of 22 Pg ID 84
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 20 of 22 Pg ID 85
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 21 of 22 Pg ID 86
2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/08/15 Pg 22 of 22 Pg ID 87
§ 188.05-3 New vessels and existing vessels for the purpose of application of regulations in this subchapter. ( a ) *New vessels.* In this application of the regulations in this subchapter, a new vessel is meant to be one, the construction of which is contracted for on or after March 1, 1968, or the major alteration of a vessel is contracted for on or after March 1, 1968, or the conversion of any vessel not previously inspected and certificated by the Coast Guard which is contracted for on or after March 1, 1968.
( b ) *Existing vessels.* In the application of the regulations in this subchapter an existing vessel is meant to be one which is holding a valid certificate of inspection as an oceanographic research vessel on March 1, 1968.
( c ) *Other vessels.* When it is desired to have a vessel, which has been used in trade or for recreational purposes, initially inspected and certificated as an oceanographic research vessel on or after March 1, 1968, such vessel shall be subject to all the requirements governing a vessel contracted for on or after March 1, 1968. However, if such vessel has a current certificate of inspection as a passenger, tank, cargo, or miscellaneous vessel, the Commandant may authorize its inspection and certification under this subchapter as a vessel contracted for prior to March 1, 1968, subject to those requirements necessitated by change in service.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1113, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 77-081, 46 FR 56204, Nov. 16, 1981]
EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-50404) of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our report dated September 22, 2003 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern), which appears on page F-2 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003.





GELFOND HOCHSTADT PANGBURN, P.C.


Denver, Colorado

September 26, 2003


<PAGE>