18492 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Notices 

eliminate duties on between 175,000 

and 250,000 metric tons, raw value, of 

sugar goods of Mexico that are classified 

in the tariff items listed below. Duties 

on these goods would be eliminated on 

October 1, 2007. Section 201(b) of the 

North American Free Trade Agreement 

Implementation Act (Act) authorizes the 

President, subject to the consultation 

and layover requirements in section 

103(a) of the Act, to proclaim such 

modifications as the United States may 

agree to with Mexico or Canada 

regarding the staging of any duty 

treatment set forth in Annex 302.2 of the 

NAFTA. Section 103(a) requires the 

President to obtain advice regarding the 

proposed action from the Commission. 

The USTR requested that the 

Commission provide advice as to the 

probable economic effect on domestic 

industries producing like or directly 

competitive articles, workers in these 

industries, and on consumers of the 

affected goods, of eliminating the U.S. 

tariff under the NAFTA on between 

175,000 and 250,000 metric tons, raw 

value, of sugar goods of Mexico falling 

under the following Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule subheadings: (1) 1701.11.50 

(raw cane sugar); (2) 1701.12.50 (raw 

beet sugar); (3) 1701.91.30 (refined 

sugar, containing added coloring); (4) 

1701.99.50 (other refined sugar); (5) 

1702.90.20 (other sugar and syrups, 

containing 6 percent or less soluble nonsugar solids); and (6) 2106.90.46 (sugar 

syrups, containing added coloring). 

As requested, the Commission will 

provide its advice to the USTR by June 

15, 2007. USTR has classified as 

Confidential the sections of the report 

that analyze probable economic effects, 

as well as other information that would 

reveal any aspect of the probable 

economic effects advice. USTR also 

requested that the Commission issue, as 

soon as possible after June 15, a public 

version of its report with any 

confidential business information 

deleted. Accordingly, the Commission 

will issue a public version of the report 

as soon as possible after June 15 and 

completion of USTR’s review for 

classification purposes. The public 

version of the report will not include 

any sections of the report or information 

that USTR has classified as 

Confidential, or any information that the 

Commission considers to be 

confidential business information. 

Written Submissions: In lieu of a 

public hearing, interested parties are 

invited to submit written statements 

concerning the matters to be addressed 

by the Commission in this investigation. 

Submissions should be addressed to the 

Secretary, United States International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. To be assured of 

consideration by the Commission, 

written statements should be submitted 

to the Commission at the earliest 

practical date and should be received no 

later than the close of business on May 

4, 2007. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of § 201.8 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 

201.8 of the rules requires that a signed 

original (or copy designated as an 

original) and fourteen (14) copies of 

each document be filed. In the event 

that confidential treatment of the 

document is requested, at least four (4) 

additional copies must be filed, from 

which the confidential business 

information must be deleted (see the 

following paragraph for further 

information regarding confidential 

business information). The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by § 201.8 of the rules 

(see Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/handbook_on_ 

electronic_filing.pdf. Persons with 

questions regarding electronic filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205–

2000 or edis@usitc.gov). 

Any submissions that contain 

confidential business information must 

also conform with the requirements of 

§ 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.6). 

Section 201.6 of the rules requires that 

the cover of the document and the 

individual pages be clearly marked as to 

whether they are the ‘‘confidential’’ or 

‘‘nonconfidential’’ version, and that the 

confidential business information be 

clearly identified by means of brackets. 

All written submissions, except for 

confidential business information, will 

be made available in the Office of the 

Secretary to the Commission for 

inspection by interested parties. 

The Commission may include some or 

all of the confidential business 

information submitted in the course of 

this investigation in the report it sends 

to the USTR and the President. 

However, the Commission will not 

publish such confidential business 

information in the public version of its 

report in a manner that would reveal the 

operations of the firm supplying the 

information. 

Issued: April 6, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–6904 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response 

Compensation and Liability Act 

In accordance with Department of 

Justice policy, notice is hereby given 

that on March 29, 2007, a proposed 

consent decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) in 

United States v. Masterwear 

Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 05–

cv–00373, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Southern 

District of Indiana. 

The Consent Decree would resolve 

claims for unreimbursed past response 

costs and projected future response 

costs incurred by the United States 

related to the ongoing removal action at 

the Masterwear Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) 

in Martinsville, Indiana. Under the 

Consent Decree, the five defendants 

(James A. Reed, Linda Lou Mull Reed, 

Masterwear Corporation, William J. 

Cure, and Elizabeth J. Cure) named in 

the United States’ complaint would pay 

a total of $380,000 in past costs and 

estimated future costs, based on 

agreements with their insurance 

companies (the insurance companies are 

not signatories to the proposed Consent 

Decree but have private agreements with 

the defendants to make the payments). 

The settlement would provide EPA with 

complete reimbursement for past and 

projected future costs relating to the 

removal action. The defendants will 

remain responsible under a Unilateral 

Administrative Order dated April 22, 

2004 for completing the removal work at 

the Site, which they also intend to 

finance with funds from their insurance 

companies. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environmental and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box No. 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to United States v. 

Masterwear Corporation et al., Civil 

Action No. 05–cv–00373, D.J. Ref. 90–

11–3–08498. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, 10 West Market Street, Suite 

2100, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, and 

at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 W. Jackson 

Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604–4590. During 

the public comment period, the Consent 

Decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Notices 18493 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 761, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044–7611, 

or by faxing or e-mailing a request to 

Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$8.75 (35 pages at 25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury. 

William D. Brighton, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–1814 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Notice of Charter Renewal 

In accordance with the provisions of 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 

Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 

and Title 41, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Section 101–6.1015, with 

the concurrence of the Attorney 

General, I have determined that the 

continuance of the Criminal Justice 

Information Services (CJIS) Advisory 

Policy Board (APB) is in the public 

interest. In connection with the 

performance of duties imposed upon the 

FBI by law, I hereby give notice of the 

renewal of the APB Charter, effective 

February 23, 2007. 

The APB provides me with general 

policy recommendations with respect to 

the philosophy, concept, and 

operational principles of the various 

criminal justice information systems 

managed by the FBI’s CJIS Division. 

The APB includes representatives 

from state and local criminal justice 

agencies; members of the judicial, 

prosecutorial, and correctional sectors 

of the criminal justice community, as 

well as one individual representing a 

national security agency; a 

representative of federal agencies 

participating in the CJIS Systems; and 

representatives of criminal justice 

professional associations (i.e., the 

American Probation and Parole 

Association; American Society of Crime 

Laboratory Directors, Inc.; International 

Association of Chiefs of Police; National 

District Attorneys’ Association; National 

Sheriffs’ Association; Major Cities 

Chiefs’ Association; Major County 

Sheriffs’ Association; and a 

representative from a national 

professional association representing 

the courts or court administrators 

nominated by the Conference of Chief 

Justices). The Attorney General has 

granted me the authority to appoint all 

members to the APB. 

The APB functions solely as an 

advisory body in compliance with the 

provisions of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act. The Charter has been 

filed in accordance with the provisions 

of the Act. 

Dated: April 2, 2007. 

Robert S. Mueller, III, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 07–1818 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–M 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Office 

Notice of Roundtable on the World 

Intellectual Property Organization 

(WIPO) Treaty On the Protection of the 

Rights of Broadcasting Organizations 

AGENCY: United States Copyright Office, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Notice announcing public 

forum. 

SUMMARY: The United States Copyright 

Office and the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) announce a 

public roundtable discussion 

concerning the work at the World 

Intellectual Property Organization 

(WIPO) in the Standing Committee on 

Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) on 

a proposed Treaty on the Protection of 

the Rights of Broadcasting 

Organizations. Members of the public 

are invited to attend and observe the 

roundtable, or to participate in the 

roundtable discussion, on the topics 

outlined in the supplementary 

information section of this notice. 

DATES: The roundtable will be held on 

Wednesday, May 9, 2007, beginning at 

2 p.m. and ending at 4 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The roundtable will be held 

in the Mumford Room at the James 

Madison Memorial Building, 6th Floor, 

Library of Congress, 101 Independence 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. 

Persons wishing to attend and observe 

or participate in the roundtable are 

required to submit requests to observe 

the roundtable or participate, preferably 

by electronic mail through the Internet 

to sking@loc.gov. Alternatively, you 

may submit requests by facsimile at 

202–707–8366 or via regular mail to: 

U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright GC/ 

I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Southwest Station, 

Washington, DC 20024, marked to the 

attention of Simone King. Please be 

aware that delivery of mail (U.S. Postal 

Service and private carrier) sent to the 

U.S. Copyright Office is subject to delay. 

Therefore, it is strongly suggested that 

any request to observe or participate be 

made via e–mail or fax. Requests to 

observe the roundtable or to participate 

as a member of the roundtable must 

indicate the following information: 

1. The name of the person, including 

whether it is your intention to observe 

the roundtable or to participate as a 

member of the roundtable; 

2. The organization or organizations 

represented by that person, if any; 

3. Contact information (address, 

telephone, and e–mail); 

4. Information on the specific focus or 

interest of the observer or participant (or 

his or her organization) and any 

questions or issues you would like to 

raise. 

The deadline for receipt of requests to 

observe or participate in the roundtable 

is 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 4, 2007. If 

we receive so many requests that we 

reach the room’s capacity, attendance 

will be granted in the order the requests 

were received. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Simone King by telephone at 202–707–

5516, by facsimile at 202–707–8366, by 

electronic mail at sking@loc.gov, or by 

mail addressed to the U.S. Copyright 

Office, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 

70400, Southwest Station, Washington, 

DC 20024, marked to the attention of 

Simone King. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

For the past eight years and since the 

first meeting of the Standing Committee 

on Copyright and Related Rights in 

November 1998, WIPO has been 

addressing the topic of updating the 

protection of the rights of broadcasting 

organizations. Although broadcasters’

rights are protected under some existing 

international agreements, such as under 

the 1961 Convention for the Protection 

of Performers, Producers of Phonograms 

and Broadcasting Organizations 

(however, the United States is not a 

party to that treaty) and the World Trade 

Organization’s Agreement on Trade–

Related Aspects of Intellectual Property 

Rights, there has been increasing 

concern that changes in technology and 

the opening up of much of the world to 

commercial broadcasting, have made 

the protection provided in those 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES