UNITED STATES
                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        WASHINGTON, DC.  20549
                               FORM 10-K/A
                            (Amendment No. 2)


(Mark One)
[X]  ANNUAL  REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE  SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended         December 31, 2001
                         ---------------------------------------------
                                  or
[   ]  TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT TO SECTION  13  OR  15(d)  OF  THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________ to _________________

Commission file number                33-19811
                       -----------------------------------------------

                     DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
        (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     Pennsylvania                                        23-2492210
-------------------------------                    -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                    (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                     Identification No.)

                1521 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA  19102
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code    (215) 557-9800
                                                    ------------------

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:   NONE
                                                            ----------

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: 25,461 Units
                                                            ------------

                 Units of Limited Partnership Interest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                           (Title of Class)

Indicate  by  check  mark whether the registrant  (1)  has  filed  all
reports  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934 during the preceding 12 months  (or  for  such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and  (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past  90
days.                                            Yes   X      No
                                                     -----       -----

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant  to
Item  405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will  not  be
contained  to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive  proxy
or  information statements incorporated by reference in  Part  III  of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

Aggregate  market  value  of  Units  held  by  non-affiliates  of  the
Registrant:                                           Not Applicable *
                                                      ----------------
*Securities not quoted in any trading market to Registrant's knowlege.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes ___ No_X_


<PAGE>


                           EXPLANATORY NOTE
                           ----------------

Diversified  Historic Investors VI (the "Registrant") is  filing  this
Amendment  No.  2  to  its Amendment No. 1 which was  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC")  on  August  17,  2005,
concerning its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December
31, 2001, which was initially filed with the SEC on July 21, 2004. The
purpose  of the amendments are in response to a notification from  the
SEC's  Division of Corporate Finance on February 23, 2005  identifying
that,  at  the time the original Form 10-K was filed, the Registrant's
former  certifying accountant, Gross, Kreger & Passio, L.L.C.  ("Gross
Kreger"),  had not registered with the Public Company Oversight  Board
("PCAOB") as required under Section 102 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

As  reported  on the Registrant's Form 8-K under Item 4.02  which  was
filed  with  the SEC on June 27, 2005, Gross Kreger's non-registration
with  the PCAOB had resulted in the reports being classified as  "non-
compliant."   Accordingly,  the  consolidated   financial   statements
contained therein should no longer be relied upon. The Registrant  had
filed unaudited reports on August 17, 2005.

The  SEC has informed the Registrant that, because of the deficiencies
in  the 2001 audit report, this annual report does not comply with the
U.S. Securities laws and SEC rules.  This matter has been referred  to
the SEC's Division of Enforcement.



                         MATERIAL CONSEQUENCES
                         ---------------------

As  a result of the deficiencies in the originally filed annual report
described  above and the SEC's review and possible enforcement  action
related  to  the  annual  report, the Registrant  may  be  subject  to
liability  for  failure to comply with U.S. Securities  laws  and  SEC
rules  in an enforcement action by the SEC.  The Registrant is  unable
at  this time to predict what if any action the SEC might take but any
such  actions  could result in monetary penalties  and  actions  taken
against the Registrant's General Partner.  Any of the foregoing  could
have a material adverse impact on the Registrant.

<PAGE>



                            COMPLIANCE PLAN
                            ---------------

The  Registrant's  General Partner has taken the  following  steps  to
bring this annual report into full compliance with the SEC rules:

       .  Engage Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP, an accounting
          firm registered with the PCAOB to perform an audit on the
          Registrant's 2001 consolidated financial statements.

       .  The Registrant intends to make its annual report fully compliant
          with SEC rules and promptly thereafter will file another
          amendment to this annual report with the SEC

The   Registrant   has  successfully  followed  its  compliance   plan
described  above.   By  filing this Amendment No.  2,  the  Registrant
fully complies with the SEC requirements.


<PAGE>


                                PART I
                                ------

Item 1.      Business
             --------

          a. General Development of Business

              Diversified  Historic Investors VI ("Registrant")  is  a
limited  partnership  formed in 1988 under Pennsylvania  law.   As  of
December 31, 2001, Registrant had outstanding 25,461 units of  limited
partnership interest (the "Units").

              Registrant  is  presently in its  operating  stage.   It
originally  owned eight properties or interests therein.  Interest  in
two properties have been lost through foreclosure and an interest in a
third   property  has  been  reduced  substantially.   See   Item   2.
Properties,  for  a  description thereof.  For  a  discussion  of  the
operations  of  the  Registrant, see Part  II.  Item  7.  Management's
Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results   of
Operations.

              The  following is a summary of significant  transactions
involving the Registrant's interests:

          b. Financial Information about Industry Segments

             The Registrant operates in one industry segment.

          c. Narrative Description of Business

              Registrant  is  in  the business of operating,  holding,
selling,  exchanging and otherwise dealing in and with real properties
containing improvements which are "Certified Historic Structures,"  as
such  term  is defined in the Internal Revenue Code (the  "Code"),  or
which  are  eligible for designation as such, for use  as  apartments,
offices, hotels and commercial spaces, or any combination thereof,  or
low income housing eligible for the tax credit provided by Section  42
of  the  Code, and such other uses as the Registrant's general partner
may deem appropriate.

              Since  the  Registrant's inception, all  the  properties
acquired  either by the Registrant, or the subsidiary partnerships  in
which  it  has  an interest, have been rehabilitated and certified  as
historic  structures  and  have received the  related  investment  tax
credit.   In  addition,  four  properties (Roseland,  Mater  Dolorosa,
Strehlow  Terrace  and  Saunders Apartments)  are  low-income  housing
structures  which  qualify for, have received, and  will  continue  to
receive, the low income tax credits.  Each of the properties currently
owned  are held for rental operations.  At this time it is anticipated
that all the properties will continue to be held for this purpose.  At
such  time as real property values begin to increase to a point  where
they  can  be  sold  at  a  price which is  sufficient  to  repay  the
underlying   indebtedness,  the  Registrant   will   re-evaluate   its
investment strategy regarding the properties.

              As  of December 31, 2001, Registrant owned interests  in
six   properties,   located  in  Nebraska  (three),  Virginia   (one),
Pennsylvania  (one),  and Louisiana (one).  In total,  the  properties
contain  100  apartment units, 149 condominium units  used  as  rental
units,  and 42,772 square feet ("sf") of commercial/retail space.   As
of  December 31, 2001, 219 of the apartment and condominium units were
under lease (88%) at monthly rental rates ranging from $246 to $1,550.
In  addition,  44,115 sf of commercial/retail space  was  under  lease
(100%) at annual rates ranging from $7.12 to $24.14 per sf.  Rental of
the  apartments and commercial space is not expected to  be  seasonal.
For a further discussion of the properties, see Item 2. Properties.

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay the accrued expenses of the Registrant.

              The Registrant is affected by and subject to the general
competitive  conditions of the residential and commercial real  estate
industry.   As  a  result of the overbuilding  that  occurred  in  the
1980's, the competition for both residential and commercial tenants in
the  local  markets where the Registrant's properties are  located  is
generally  strong.  In each of the markets, there are several  similar
historically certified rehabilitated buildings.  Two of the properties
held  for  rental  are  market-rate  properties  and  are  located  in
Alexandria,  Virginia,  and  Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania.   At   these
properties   the  Registrant  is  forced  to  keep  its  rent   levels
competitively  low  in order to maintain moderate  to  high  occupancy
levels.  Management of each of these properties makes frequent  market
analyses in order to set rent levels.  When occupancy nears the 97-99%
range,  management considers raising the rents by more than  a  normal
cost  of  living  increase. If occupancy falls below  85%,  management
considers lowering rents.  Four of the properties held for rental  are
low-income  housing  structures located in Omaha,  Nebraska,  and  New
Orleans, Louisiana.  These properties have fixed rental rates and face
competition for low to moderate income tenants from other  low  income
properties in the area.  However, there is no organization which holds
a  dominant position in the residential housing or commercial  leasing
market  in  any  of  the  geographic areas in which  the  Registrant's
properties are located.

              Registrant  has  no employees.  The  management  of  the
Registrant's  properties  are overseen by  Brandywine  Construction  &
Management, Inc. ("BCMI"), a real estate management firm.

            d.   Financial  Information  About  Foreign  and  Domestic
Operations and Export Sales

             See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 2.      Properties
             ----------

           As of December 31, 2001, Registrant owned interests in five
partnerships that each owns one property and a minority interest in an
additional  partnership that owns one property.  A summary description
of each property is given below.

           a.  Firehouse  Square - consists of 31,507sf of  commercial
space  at  902-910 King Street in Alexandria, Virginia.   In  December
1988, Registrant was admitted, with a 90% general partner interest, to
Firehouse  Square  General Partnership ("FSGP"),  a  Virginia  general
partnership,  for  a  cash capital contribution of  $1,750,000.   FSGP
acquired  and  rehabilitated the property for $5,660,000 ($151.51  per
sf), funded by the equity contribution and a mortgage note payable  of
$4,207,000.   On June 1, 1993, the first mortgage was  modified.   The
terms  of  the modification included the addition of all  accrued  and
unpaid  interest ($218,728) to the principal balance and  revision  of
the  payment terms.  The lender also advanced $40,711 for real  estate
taxes  and  $33,627  for  tenant improvements.   Monthly  payments  of
interest to the new note holder were to be made in an amount equal  to
net  operating income.  The note accrued interest at prime plus  1/2%.
On  November  16, 1994, the new first mortgage holder foreclosed  upon
its  mortgage.  By "credit bidding" its mortgage, the mortgage  holder
became the successful bidder at sale.  The first mortgage holder  sold
its  successful  bid  to  a  partnership  known  as  901  King  Street
Associates  ("KSA").  KSA is a general partnership owned  90%  by  the
Registrant.  The selling price of the mortgage was the amount that the
mortgage  had  been immediately prior to foreclosure.  The  obligation
has  terms  materially the same as the original mortgage loan  and  is
secured by a new mortgage on the property.  Therefore, after the sale,
the   Registrant's  interest  in  the  property  was  unchanged.   The
principal balance of the mortgage at December 31, 1997 was $4,304,188.
The  note accrued interest at prime plus 1/2% and the entire principal
balance was due October 1998.  In June 1995, the Registrant refinanced
$900,000 of the first mortgage. This loan bore interest at 9.75%,  was
payable  in monthly installments of principal and interest  of  $8,021
and  was  due  in  June 2005.  In November 1998, both  mortgages  were
refinanced.   The  first  mortgage was refinanced  with  a  $1,937,000
mortgage (principal balance of $1,849,227 at December 31, 2001)  which
bears  interest  at  7.08%,  is payable  in  monthly  installments  of
principal  and interest of $13,789 and is due in November  2008.   The
second  mortgage was refinanced with a $4,330,107 mortgage  (principal
balance  of  $4,367,913 at December 31, 2001) which bears interest  at
7%,  is due in December 2008 with monthly payments of interest  to  be
made  in  an amount equal to net operating income.  Proceeds from  the
refinancing  of  the  first mortgage were used to  reduce  the  second
mortgage principal.

              In  September 2002, the mortgages were refinanced.   The
principal  balance of the first mortgage was increased  to  $3,520,000
and  the  net  proceeds were used to reduce the second  mortgage.   In
exchange  for a 20% ownership interest in and a preferred return  from
KSA,  the  second  mortgage  holder  converted  the  balance  of   its
outstanding debt to equity.  The new first mortgage bears interest  at
6.75 % and is due March 1, 2013.

              The  property  is managed by BCMI.  As of  December  31,
2001,  all 31,507 sf of space were under lease (100%) at annual  rates
ranging  from $7.56 to $22.18 per sf.  The occupancy for the  previous
four  years was 100% for 2000, 1999, and 1998, and 94% for 1997.   The
average annual rent was $7.34 to $21.53 for 2000, and $7.12 to  $20.89
for  1999,1998, and 1997. There are three tenants who each occupy  ten
percent  or  more  of  the  rentable  square  footage.   They  operate
principally  as  a  law firm, an architectural  firm  and  a  computer
company.   All  leases  are operating leases and  the  minimum  future
rentals  on  the  non-cancelable leases as of December  31,  2001  are
$538,505.
              The  following  is  a  table  showing  commercial  lease
expirations at Firehouse Square for the next five years.

                                        Total
                                        annual    % of gross
                          Total sf      rental      annual
              Number of      of       covered by    rental
               Leases     expiring     expiring      from
     Year     expiring     leases       leases     property
     ----     ---------   --------    ----------  ----------
     2002         4        13,227      $216,570     43%
     2003         5        14,286      $244,805     45%
     2004         0             0      $      0      0%
     2005         1         1,344      $ 28,224      4%
     2006         1         2,650      $ 48,906      8%


             For tax purposes, this property has a basis of $4,227,405
and  is depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful  life
of  39  years.  The annual real estate taxes are $39,710.  It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

          b. Roseland - consists of 17 low-income apartments and 3,000
sf of retail space at 4932 South 24th Street in South Omaha, Nebraska.
In  July  1988,  Registrant was admitted with a  98%  general  partner
interest  and  a 1% limited partner interest to Roseland Redevelopment
Partners  ("RRP"), a Nebraska limited partnership, for a cash  capital
contribution of $700,000.  RRP acquired and rehabilitated the property
for  $1,680,000 ($70.29 per sf), funded by the equity contribution and
three  notes  payable.  The first note payable  of  $500,000  is  non-
interest  bearing  with principal due upon sale of the  property;  the
second  note payable of $63,313 bore interest at 9.16%, with  interest
adjusting every three years based on the three-year Treasury Bill rate
plus  250  basis  points, was payable in semi-annual  installments  of
principal  and  interest of $4,856 and was due in November  2001.  The
third  note  payable  of $370,000 (principal balance  of  $323,279  at
December  31,  2001)  bears  interest at 8%,  is  payable  in  monthly
installments of principal and interest of $3,083 and is due in  August
2006.

              The  property  is  managed by  an  independent  property
management  firm.  On December 31, 2001, 15 of the units  were  leased
(71%)  at  monthly  rents of $151 to $475 and 3,000 sf  of  commercial
space  (100%) was leased at annual rents ranging from $3.00  to  $8.00
per  sf.  All residential leases are renewable, one-year leases.   The
occupancy  for the residential units for the previous four  years  was
80%  for  2000,  80% for 1999, 82% for 1998, and 92%  for  1997.   The
monthly rental range has been approximately the same since 1995.   The
commercial  space has been 100% occupied since 1995.   The  range  for
annual  rents has been $3.00 to $8.00 for 2000, $3.13 to $5.00 per  sf
for  1999 and 1998, and $3.13 to $5.50 per sf for 1997.  There is  one
tenant  who  occupies  ten  percent or more  of  the  rentable  square
footage.  It principally functions as a tax counseling provider.   All
commercial leases are operating leases and the minimum future  rentals
on the noncancelable leases as of December 31, 2001 are $4,800.

              The  following  is  a  table  showing  commercial  lease
expirations at Roseland for the next five years:

                                        Total
                                        annual
                          Total sf      rental
              Number of      of       covered by  % of gross
               Leases     expiring     expiring     annual
     Year     expiring     leases       leases      rental
     ----     ---------   --------    ----------  ----------
     2002         0             0             0      0%
     2003         1           600        $4,800      7%
     2004         0             0             0      0
     2005         0             0             0      0
     2006         0             0             0      0

             For tax purposes, this property has a basis of $1,715,564
and  is depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful  life
of  27.5  years.  The annual real estate taxes are $1,268. It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

           c.  Mater  Dolorosa Apartments - consists of 68 low  income
apartments  located at 1265 South Carrollton Avenue  in  New  Orleans,
Louisiana.   In July 1988, Registrant was admitted with a 90%  general
partnership interest to Mater Dolorosa General Partnership ("MDGP")  a
Pennsylvania   general  partnership,  for  a  cash   contribution   of
$1,519,000.    MDGP  acquired  and  rehabilitated  the  property   for
$3,149,000  ($59.39 per sf), funded by the equity contribution  and  a
note  payable of $1,790,000.  The note payable bears interest at 8.5%,
is  payable  in  monthly  installments of principal  and  interest  of
$17,627,  and is due in April 2005 (principal balance at December  31,
2001 of $446,261).

              The  property  is managed by a property management  firm
which  is an affiliate of the Registrant's co-general partner of MDGP.
At  December  31, 2001, 66 of the units were rented (97%)  at  monthly
rents  of  $530  to $625.  All leases are renewable, one-year  leases.
The  occupancy for the previous four years was 100% for 2000, 97%  for
1999,  1998, and 1997.  The monthly rental range was $519 to  $621  in
2000,  and  has  been  approximately the same  since  1995.   For  tax
purposes,  this property has a basis of $2,803,265 and is  depreciated
using the straight-line method with a useful life of 27.5 years.   The
annual  real  estate  taxes are $5,541. There is  no  one  tenant  who
occupies  ten percent or more of the building.  It is the  opinion  of
the  management  of  the  Registrant that the property  is  adequately
covered by insurance.

           d.  Strehlow Terrace Apartments - consists of 70 low income
apartment  units  located at 2024 North 16th Street, Omaha,  Nebraska.
In  January  1989, Registrant was admitted with a 98% general  partner
interest to Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership ("STALP"),
a  Nebraska  limited partnership, for a cash capital  contribution  of
$2,250,000.   STALP  acquired  and  rehabilitated  the  property   for
$5,817,000 ($52.02 per sf) funded by the equity contribution and three
mortgage  loans.   The first loan, financed through  the  Governmental
National  Mortgage  Association ("GNMA") is for $1,789,000  (principal
balance  at  December 31, 2001 of $1,775,053), bears interest  at  10-
1/4%, is payable in monthly installments of principal and interest  of
$15,540,  and is due in 2030.  In August 1993, six units were  damaged
by  a  fire  at  Strehlow Terrace.  Due to the financial  difficulties
caused  by the fire, STALP fell behind on its monthly debt service  by
several  months.   Although  the  property  was  able  to  reduce  the
arrearage by 50% and commenced regular, monthly payments by May  1994,
the  loan  was  declared in default and was assigned by  GNMA  to  the
Federal   Housing   Administration/Housing   and   Urban   Development
("FHA/HUD")  on  June  24,  1994.  As of December  31,  2001,  workout
opportunities with HUD continue to be suspended.  The other two  loans
were  made  by  the City of Omaha.  One, in the amount of  $1,700,000,
bears interest at 1%, and the other, in the amount of $75,000, is non-
interest bearing.  The principal and applicable interest on both  City
of  Omaha  loans is due upon the sale of the property or in  the  year
2030, whichever is earlier.

              The  property  is  managed by  an  independent  property
management  firm.   On  December 31, 2001, 47 of the  apartments  were
leased  (67%) at monthly rents ranging from $200 to $577.  All  leases
are  renewable, one-year leases.  The occupancy for the previous  four
years was 89% for 2000, 98% for 1999, 97% for 1998,  and 97% for 1997.
The  monthly rental range has been approximately the same since  1995.
For  tax  purposes,  this property has a basis of  $4,886,283  and  is
depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful life of  27.5
years.   The  annual  real  estate taxes are $14,982.  No  one  tenant
occupies  ten percent of more of the building.  It is the  opinion  of
the  management  of  the  Registrant that the property  is  adequately
covered by insurance.

             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

           e.  Canal  House  - consists of 71 residential  condominium
units and 8,341sf of commercial condominium space located at 4250-4312
Main Street, Manayunk, Pennsylvania.  In February 1989, Registrant was
admitted  to  Canal House Historic Associates ("CHHA"), a Pennsylvania
limited  partnership, with a 99% general partner interest for  a  cash
contribution   of  $6,000,000.   During  1990,  Registrant   made   an
additional  cash contribution of $200,000.  The 1% limited partnership
interest  is  also  controlled  by  Registrant;  it  is  held   by   a
Pennsylvania  corporation whose stock is owned  by  Registrant.   CHHA
acquired and rehabilitated the property for $9,700,000 ($94.41 per sf)
which  was  funded by the equity contribution and a loan of $4,000,000
with  interest  at  7.75% and monthly principal and interest  payments
(based  on  a  30-year amortization schedule).  In October  1995,  the
Registrant ceased making debt service payments.  The loan was sold  in
December 1995.  The Registrant entered into an agreement with the  new
holder  of  the note (principal balance of $1,520,117 at December  31,
2001)  whereby the maturity of the loan was extended to December  2002
and monthly payments of interest are to be made to the new note holder
in  an  amount  equal  to net operating income.  In  April  1996,  the
Registrant refinanced $3,216,000 of the first mortgage.  This new loan
was  a first mortgage which bore interest at 8.75%, payable in monthly
installments of principal and interest of $25,300 and was due in April
2003.   In  September  1998, the second mortgage lender  advanced  the
property $3,907,200 to repay the first mortgage with the intention  of
refinancing  the  first  mortgage at  a  lower  interest  rate.   This
refinancing  was completed in January 1999 with a $4,000,000  mortgage
loan which bears interest at 7.22%, is payable in monthly payments  of
principal and interest of $27,206 and is due in January 2009.

             The property is managed by BCMI. At December 31, 2001, 69
of  the  residential units were under lease (97%) at monthly rents  of
$725 to $1,695, and 7,306 sf of commercial space was under lease (88%)
at annual rents ranging from $22.80 to $26.87 per sf.  All residential
leases   are  renewable,  one-year  leases.  The  occupancy  for   the
residential  units for the previous four years was 96% for  2000,  93%
for  1999,  92% for 1998, and 94% for 1997.  The monthly rental  range
has  been  approximately the same since 1995.  The occupancy  for  the
commercial space was 100% for 2000, 1999, and 1998, and 90% for  1997.
The  range  for annual rents was $22.47 to $23.22 for 2000,  $7.12  to
$20.89  for  1999,  $19.00 to $24.14 per sf for 1998,  and  $19.00  to
$23.11  per sf for 1997.  There are no tenants who occupy ten  percent
or  more  of  the rentable square footage.  All leases  are  operating
leases  and the minimum future rentals on the noncancelable leases  as
of December 31, 2001 are $183,341.

              The  following  is  a  table  showing  commercial  lease
expirations at Canal House for the next five years.

                                         Total
                                        annual
                          Total sf      rental
              Number of      of       covered by  % of gross
               Leases     expiring     expiring     annual
     Year     expiring     leases       leases      rental
     ----     ---------   --------    ----------  ----------
     2002         1          850       $ 19,740       2%
     2003         0            0              0       0
     2004         0            0              0       0
     2005         1        2,426       $ 55,313       5%
     2006         1        4,030       $108,288      11%


             For tax purposes, this property has a basis of $8,488,548
and  is depreciated using the straight-line method with a useful  life
of  27.5 years.  The annual real estate taxes are $93,268. It  is  the
opinion  of  the  management of the Registrant that  the  property  is
adequately covered by insurance.

           f.    Saunders  Apartments  -  consists  of  23  low-income
apartments  at  415 North 41st Avenue in Omaha, Nebraska.   Registrant
acquired  a  99%  joint venture interest in Saunders Apartments  Joint
Venture  ("SAJV"),  a  Nebraska Joint  Venture,  for  a  cash  capital
contribution  of  $875,000.   SAJV  acquired  and  rehabilitated   the
property  for  $1,815,000  ($79.96  per  sf),  funded  by  the  equity
contribution and a mortgage payable of $675,000.  The note was retired
with  $285,000  advanced from Registrant's co-general partner,  and  a
mortgage  note payable of $395,000 (principal balance at December  31,
2001  of  $266,415).  The mortgage note bears interest at  10.87%,  is
payable in monthly installments of $3,723 and matured in May 1997.  On
June  1,  1993  an  amended and restated joint venture  agreement  was
reached  whereby  the  Registrant's interest  was  reduced  to  a  30%
interest.

              The  property  is  managed by  an  independent  property
management  firm.  As of December 31, 2001, 23 units were under  lease
(96%) with rents ranging from $385 to $430.  All leases are renewable,
one-year  leases.  The occupancy for the previous four years  was  96%
for 2000, 100% for 1999, 100% for 1998, and 93% for 1997.  The monthly
rental  range  has been approximately the same since  1995.   For  tax
purposes,  this property has a basis of $2,010,482 and is  depreciated
using the straight-line method with a useful life of 27.5 years.   The
annual  real  estate  taxes are $7,923. No  one  tenant  occupies  ten
percent  or more of the building.  It is the opinion of the management
of   the  Registrant  that  the  property  is  adequately  covered  by
insurance.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay the accrued expenses of the Registrant.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
         -----------------

          a. To the best of its knowledge, Registrant is not party to,
nor  are  any  of its properties the subject of, any pending  material
legal proceedings.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

          No  matter was submitted during the fiscal years covered  by
this report to a vote of security holders.


<PAGE>
                                PART II
                                -------

Item   5.     Market  for  Registrant's  Common  Equity  and   Related
              Stockholder Matters
              --------------------------------------------------------

          a.  There  is no established public trading market  for  the
Units.   Registrant does not anticipate any such market will  develop.
Trading in the units occurs solely through private transactions.   The
Registrant  is  not  aware  of  the  prices  at  which  trades  occur.
Registrant's records indicate that 203 units were sold or exchanged of
record in 2001.

          b.  As of December 31, 2001, there were 2,827 record holders
of Units.

          c.  Registrant did not declare any cash dividends in 2001 or 2000.


Item 6.   Selected Financial Data
          -----------------------

         The  following selected financial data are for the five years
ended December 31, 2001.  This data should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.  This
data is not covered by the independent auditors' report.

                    2001        2000       1999        1998         1997
                    ----        ----       ----        ----         ----
Rental income $ 2,434,782 $ 2,445,698 $ 2,373,232 $ 2,295,927  $ 2,332,312

Interest income     4,681       6,966       3,677       2,783          949
Net loss        1,395,838   1,338,104   1,650,894   2,447,292    2,016,133
Net loss
 per Unit           54.27       52.03       64.19       95.16        78.40
Total assets
 (net of depre-
 ciation and
 amortization) 15,571,065  16,646,793  17,740,808  18,878,736   19,709,306
Debt obliga-
 tions         16,616,789  16,857,962  17,077,741  17,161,190   15,451,686

Note:  See Part II, Item 7.3 Results of Operations for a discussion of
factors which materially affect the comparability of the information
reflected in the above table.


Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of
          Financial Condition and Results of Operations
          ---------------------------------------------

          (1)  Liquidity

              At  December 31, 2001, Registrant had total unrestricted
cash of $38,973.  Cash generated from operations is used primarily  to
fund  operating expenses and debt service.  If cash flow proves to  be
insufficient,   the   Registrant  will  attempt  to   negotiate   loan
modifications with the various lenders in order to remain  current  on
all  obligations.   The  Registrant is not  aware  of  any  additional
sources of liquidity.

              As  of December 31, 2001, Registrant had restricted cash
of  $294,265 consisting primarily of funds held as security  deposits,
replacement  reserves  and  escrows for taxes  and  insurance.   As  a
consequence of these restrictions as to use, Registrant does not  deem
these funds to be a source of liquidity.

              In  recent years the Registrant has realized significant
losses,  including the foreclosure of two properties and a substantial
reduction  of interest in a third property.  At the present time,  all
remaining properties are able to pay their operating expenses and debt
service including two of the properties where the mortgages are  cash-
flow  mortgages,  requiring  all  available  cash  after  payment   of
operating expenses to be paid to the first mortgage holder.   None  of
the properties is currently producing a material amount of revenues in
excess  of  operating  expenses and debt service.   Therefore,  it  is
unlikely that any cash will be available to the Registrant to pay  its
general and administrative expenses.

              It is the Registrant's intention to continue to hold the
properties until they can no longer meet the debt service requirements
and  the  properties  are  foreclosed, or  the  market  value  of  the
properties  increases to a point where they can be  sold  at  a  price
which  is  sufficient to repay the underlying indebtedness  (principal
plus accrued interest).


             Strehlow Terrace Apartments was foreclosed by the
Department of Housing
and Urban Development, the guarantor of the first mortgage, on April
30, 2002.

              On   June  30,  2002,  the  Registrant's  investment  in
Saunders  Apartments was sold for $25,000.  The proceeds of  the  sale
were used to pay the accrued expenses of the Registrant.

          (2)  Capital Resources

             Any capital expenditures needed are generally replacement
items  and  are  funded  out  of cash from operations  or  replacement
reserves,  if  any.  The Registrant is not aware of any factors  which
would   cause  historical  capital  expenditures  levels  not  to   be
indicative of capital requirements in the future and accordingly, does
not  believe that it will have to commit material resources to capital
investments for the foreseeable future.

          (3)  Results of Operations

             During 2001, Registrant incurred a net loss of $1,395,838
($54.27  per  limited partnership unit) compared  to  a  net  loss  of
$1,338,104  ($52.03 per limited partnership unit) in 2000  and  a  net
loss of $1,650,894 ($64.84 per limited partnership unit) in 1999.

              Rental  income  increased from  $2,373,232  in  1999  to
$2,445,698 in 2000 and decreased to $2,434,782 in 2001.  The  decrease
from  2000  to  2001  is  due to a decrease in  average  occupancy  at
Strehlow, partially offset by an increase in the average rental  rates
at Canal House and Firehouse Square. The increase from 1999 to 2000 is
due  to  an  increase in average occupancy at Canal  House  and  Mater
Dolorosa,  partially  offset by a decrease  in  average  occupancy  at
Roseland and Strehlow.

              Rental  operations expense increased from $1,123,015  in
1999  to  $1,192,754 in 2000 and to $1,247,800 in 2001.  The  increase
from  2000  to  2001 is due to an increase in maintenance  expense  at
Canal  House,  Mater Dolorosa, and Roseland, an increase in  utilities
expense at Strehlow and Roseland, and an increase in insurance expense
at  Canal House and Mater Dolorosa.  The increase from 1999 to 2000 is
due  increases  in  accounting fees and commissions expense  at  Canal
House,  wages and salaries expense at Mater Dolorosa and Strehlow  and
maintenance  expense  at  Firehouse  Square,  partially  offset  by  a
decrease in maintenance expense at Strehlow.

              Interest  expense decreased from $1,411,077 in  1999  to
$1,398,919 in 2000 and to $1,397,720 in 2001.  The decrease from  2000
to  2001  and from 1999 to 2000 is due to a decrease in the  principal
balance on which interest is calculated.

              Depreciation  and  amortization expense  decreased  from
$1,229,432  in 1999 to $1,178,867 in 2000 and increased to  $1,190,197
in  2001.   The  decrease  from  1999 to  2000  is  due  to  the  full
amortization of loan costs at Canal House in 1999.

               In   2001,  losses  of  $1,293,000  were  incurred   at
Registrant's properties compared to losses of $ 1,227,000 in 2000  and
$1,301,000  in  1999.   A discussion of property operations/activities
follows:

              In  2001,  Registrant  incurred a  loss  of  $86,000  at
Roseland,  including $69,000 of depreciation expense,  compared  to  a
loss  of  $79,000, including $70,000 of depreciation expense, in  2000
and  a loss of $77,000 including, $71,000 of depreciation expense,  in
1999.   Since  Roseland is a low income housing  property,  rents  are
fixed in relation to specified income levels.  As a result, similar to
Mater  Dolorosa  and  Strehlow Terrace discussed below,  the  property
experiences high occupancy levels but rental income remains low.   The
increase  in loss from 2000 to 2001 is due to an increase in utilities
expense and maintenance expense. The increase in utilities expense  is
due  to  an  increase  in  electricity expense  and  the  increase  in
maintenance  expense  is due to an increase in  apartment  preparation
expenses.   The increase in the loss from 1999 to 2000  is  due  to  a
decrease  in  rental  income and an increase in  maintenance  expense,
partially  offset  by a decrease in legal and accounting  expense  and
wages and salaries expense.

              In  2001,  Registrant incurred a  loss  of  $460,000  at
Firehouse  Square, including $276,000 of depreciation and amortization
expense,  compared  to  a  loss  of $499,000,  including  $268,000  of
depreciation and amortization expense, in 2000 and a loss of $480,000,
including $261,000 of depreciation and amortization expense  in  1999.
The decrease in loss from 2000 to 2001 is due to an increase in rental
income,  partially offset by an increase in depreciation and  interest
expense.  The  increase  in rental income is due  to  an  increase  in
average rental rates.  The increase in loss from 1999 to 2000  is  due
to  an increase in rental and interest income, partially offset by  an
increase in maintenance expense. The increase in rental income is  due
to  an  increase  in  average occupancy and the increase  in  interest
income  is  due  to interest earned on a lender reserve  balance.  The
increase  in  maintenance expense is due to an increase in maintenance
service and plumbing and electrical expense.

             In 2001, Registrant recognized income of $16,000 at Mater
Dolorosa,  including  depreciation expense of  $126,000,  compared  to
income of $21,000, including depreciation expense, of $126,000 in 2000
and  a loss of $9,000, including depreciation expense, of $127,000  in
1999.   Since  Mater Dolorosa is a low income housing property,  rents
are  fixed  in  relation to specified income  levels.   As  a  result,
similar  to  Roseland  and Strehlow Terrace, the property  experiences
high occupancy levels but rental income remains low.  The decrease  in
income  from  2000 to 2001 is due to an increase in insurance  expense
and maintenance expense. The increase in maintenance expense is due to
an  increase in repairs expense. The increase in income from  1999  to
2000  is due to an increase in rental income, partially offset  by  an
increase in operating expenses. The increase in rental income  is  due
to an increase in occupancy. The increase in operating expenses is due
to  an  increase in utilities expense and wages and salaries  expense,
partially offset by a decrease in maintenance expense and real  estate
tax expense.

              In  2001,  Registrant incurred a  loss  of  $449,000  at
Strehlow   Terrace  Apartments,  including  depreciation  expense   of
242,000,  compared  to  a  loss  of $325,000,  including  $240,000  of
depreciation  expense,  in  2000 and a  loss  of  $306,000,  including
$239,000  of depreciation expense, in 1999.  Since Strehlow is  a  low
income  housing  property, rents are fixed in  relation  to  specified
income  levels.  As a result, similar to Registrant's other low-income
properties, the property experiences high occupancy levels but  rental
income remains low.  The increase in loss from 2000 to 2001 is due  to
an increase in operating expenses and a decrease in rental income. The
decrease  in  rental income is due to a decrease in average  occupancy
and  the  increase  in  operating expense is due  to  an  increase  in
utilities expense and management fees. The increase in loss from  1999
to  2000  is  due  to a decrease in rental income and an  increase  in
operating expenses. The decrease in rental income is due to a decrease
in  average occupancy and the increase in operating expenses is due to
an   increase  in  legal  fees.   Legal  fees  increased  due  to  HUD
foreclosure proceedings.

               Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments  was  foreclosed  by  the
Department  of  Housing and Urban Development, the  guarantor  of  the
first mortgage, on April 30, 2002.

              In 2001, Registrant incurred a loss of $314,000 at Canal
House,  including  $400,000 of depreciation and  amortization  expense
compared to a loss of $344,000 including depreciation and amortization
expense  of  $396,000  in  2000  and  a  loss  of  $447,000  including
depreciation  and  amortization expense  of  $455,000  in  1999.   The
decrease  in  loss from 2000 to 2001 is due to an increase  in  rental
income,  partially  offset by an increase in  operating  expense.  The
increase  in  rental income is due to an increase  in  average  rental
rates  and the increase in operating expense is due to an increase  in
commission's expense and real estate tax expense. The decrease in loss
from  1999  to  2000  is due to an increase in  rental  income  and  a
decrease  in amortization expense, partially offset by an increase  in
operating  expenses.  The  increase in rental  income  is  due  to  an
increase in average occupancy and the decrease in amortization expense
is due to the full amortization of loan costs in 1999. The increase in
operating  expenses is due to an increase in commissions  expense  and
accounting expense, due to the accrual of prior year accounting fees.

             Summary of Equity Method Investments

              In  2001,  Registrant  incurred a  loss  of  $11,000  at
Saunders Apartments compared to a loss of $20,000 in 2000 and  a  loss
of  $19,000 in 1999.  The decrease in loss from 2000 to 2001 is due to
an  increase  in rental income and a decrease in maintenance  expense.
The  increase in rental income is due to an increase in occupancy  and
the  decrease in maintenance expense is due to a decrease in apartment
preparation  expenses and repairs expense. The increase in  loss  from
1999  to  2000  is  due  to  an increase in maintenance  expense.  The
increase  in  maintenance expense is due to an  increase  in  cleaning
service and repairs expense.

              On  June 30, 2002, the Registrant sold its investment in
Saunders  Apartments for $25,000.  The proceeds of the sale were  used
to pay the accrued expenses of the partnership.


Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
          ----------------------------------------------------------

           All  of our assets and liabilities are denominated in  U.S.
dollars, and as a result, we do not have exposure to currency exchange
risks.

           We  do  not  engage in any interest rate, foreign  currency
exchange  rate  or  commodity price-hedging  transactions,  and  as  a
result, we do not have exposure to derivatives risk.


Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
          -------------------------------------------

           Registrant  is  not required to furnish  the  supplementary
financial information referred to in Item 302 of Regulations S-K.

<PAGE>


                     Independent Auditor's Report
                     ----------------------------

To the Partners of Diversified Historic Investors VI


We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of
Diversified Historic Investors VI (a Pennsylvania limited partnership)
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and the related statements of
operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for  the  years
ended  December 31, 2001. These consolidated financial statements  are
the    responsibility   of   the   Partnership's   management.     Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial  statements
based  on  our  audit.  We did not audit the financial  statements  of
Strehlow  Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership, which reflect  total
assets  of  $3,103,198 as of December 31, 2001 and total  revenues  of
$262,574  for the year then ended.  In addition, we did not audit  the
financial  statements  of  Mater Dolorosa  General  Partnership  which
reflect  assets  of  $1,509,658 as of  December  31,  2001  and  total
revenues  of $426,567 for the year then ended.  Those statements  were
audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and
our  opinion,  insofar as it relates to the amounts included  Strehlow
Terrace  Apartments  Limited Partnership and  Mater  Dolorosa  General
Partnership, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted  in  the  United States of America.  These standards  require
that  we  plan  and  perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance
about  whether  the  consolidated financial  statements  are  free  of
material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test  basis,
evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures in  the  consolidated
financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors,
the  consolidated  financial  statements  referred  to  above  present
fairly,   in   all  material  respects,  the  financial  position   of
Diversified  Historic Investors VI as of December  31,  2001  and  the
results  of operations and cash flows for the year ended December  31,
2001  in  conformity with accounting principles generally accepted  in
the United States of America.

Our  audits  were made for the purpose of forming an  opinion  on  the
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.  The  Schedule  of
Real  Estate and Accumulated Depreciation on page 39 is presented  for
the  purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the
basic  financial statements.  Such information has been  subjected  to
the  auditing  procedures  applied in the audit  of  the  consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, which insofar as it  relates
to  Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership and Mater Dolorosa
General  Partnership  is based on the report of other  auditors,  such
information  is fairly stated in all material respects in relation  to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the  partnership will continue as a going concern.  In  recent  years,
the partnership has incurred significant losses from operations, which
raise  substantial  doubt about its ability to  continue  as  a  going
concern, which is detailed in NOTE C.  The financial statements do not
include  any  adjustments that might result from the outcome  of  this
uncertainty.

Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2006

<PAGE>

                     Independent Auditor's Report
                     ----------------------------

To the Partners of Diversified Historic Investors VI


We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of
Diversified Historic Investors VI (a Pennsylvania limited partnership)
and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2000 and 1999  and  the  related
statements  of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash  flows
for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2000,  1999  and  1998.   These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of  the
Partnership's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on  these  financial statements based on our audit.  We did not  audit
the  financial  statements  of  Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments  Limited
Partnership,  which reflect total assets of $3,336,607 and  $3,571,480
as  of  December 31, 2000 and 1999 and total revenues of $364,615  and
$367,606, respectively, for the years then ended.  In addition, we did
not   audit  the  financial  statements  of  Mater  Dolorosa   General
Partnership  which reflect assets of $1,625,365 and $1,740,784  as  of
December  31,  2000  and  1999  and total  revenues  of  $429,229  and
$417,626,  respectively, for the years then ended.   Those  statements
were  audited  by other auditors whose reports have been furnished  to
us,  and  our  opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts  included
Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments Limited Partnership and  Mater  Dolorosa
General  Partnership,  is based solely on the  reports  of  the  other
auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted  in  the  United States of America.  These standards  require
that  we  plan  and  perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance
about  whether  the  consolidated financial  statements  are  free  of
material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test  basis,
evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures in  the  consolidated
financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors,
the  consolidated  financial  statements  referred  to  above  present
fairly,   in   all  material  respects,  the  financial  position   of
Diversified  Historic Investors VI as of December 31, 2000  and  1999,
and  the  results  of operations and cash flows for  the  years  ended
December  31,  2000,  1999  and  1998 in  conformity  with  accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our  audits  were made for the purpose of forming an  opinion  on  the
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.  The  Schedule  of
Real  Estate and Accumulated Depreciation on page 35 is presented  for
the  purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the
basic  financial statements.  Such information has been  subjected  to
the  auditing  procedures  applied in the audit  of  the  consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, which insofar as it  relates
to  Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership and Mater Dolorosa
General  Partnership  is based on the report of other  auditors,  such
information  is fairly stated in all material respects in relation  to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the  partnership will continue as a going concern.  In  recent  years,
the partnership has incurred significant losses from operations, which
raise  substantial  doubt about its ability to  continue  as  a  going
concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.




Gross, Kreger & Passio, L.L.C.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 1, 2001

<PAGE>

                     Independent Auditor's Report
                     ----------------------------

To the Partners of
Strehlow Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership

We  have  audited the accompanying balance sheets of Strehlow  Terrace
Apartments Limited Partnership, (a Nebraska limited partnership),  FHA
Project  No.  103-94006, as of December 31, 2001  and  2000,  and  the
related  statements of operations, partners' deficit, and  cash  flows
for   the  years  then  ended.  These  financial  statements  are  the
responsibility of the Partnership's management.  Our responsibility is
to  express  an  opinion on these financial statements  based  on  our
audits.

We   conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards
generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America,  Government
Auditing  Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of  the  United
States,  and  the Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD  Programs
(the Guide) issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Office  of  the  Inspector General.  Those standards  and  that  guide
require  that  we  plan  and perform the audit  to  obtain  reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence
supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated  financial
statements.    An   audit  also  includes  assessing  the   accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion, the financial statements referred to  above  present
fairly,  in all material respects, the financial position of  Strehlow
Terrace Apartments Limited Partnership at December 31, 2001 and  2000,
and  the  results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit  and
cash  flows  for  the years then ended, in conformity  with  generally
accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the  Partnership  will continue as a going concern.  As  discussed  in
Note  F  to  the  financial statements, the Partnership  has  incurred
significant  losses  since its formation to operate  Strehlow  Terrace
Apartments  beginning  in  1990.  The Partnership  has  experienced  a
deficiency  in  cash  flows resulting in past due mortgage  principal,
interest  and  escrow  payments.  In addition, work-out  opportunities
with  the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have  been
suspended.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard to these
matters are also described in Note F.  The financial statements do not
include  any  adjustments that might result from the outcome  of  this
uncertainty.

In  accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated
Audit  Guide for Audits of HUD Programs, we have also issued a  report
dated  May 28, 2002 on our consideration of the Partnership's internal
control  structure  and reports dated May 28, 2002 on  its  compliance
with  specific  requirements  applicable  to  Fair  Housing  and  Non-
discrimination, and specific requirements applicable to its major  HUD
program and its non-major HUD program transactions.

Our  audits  were made for the purpose of forming an  opinion  on  the
financial  statements taken as a whole.  The supplementary information
is  presented  for the purposes of additional analysis and  is  not  a
required part of the basic financial statements.  Such information has
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the
basic  financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly  stated  in
all  material  respects in relation to the basic financial  statements
taken as a whole.

Blackman & Associates, P.C.
Omaha, Nebraska
May 28, 2002

<PAGE>


                     Independent Auditor's Report
                     ----------------------------

To the Partners of
Mater Dolorosa General Partnership

We  have  audited  the accompanying balance sheets of  Mater  Dolorosa
General  Partnership, for December 31, 2001 and 2000 and  the  related
statements  of  operations, partners' equity and cash  flows  for  the
years  then  ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility
of  the partnership's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  these  consolidated financial  statements  based  on  our
audits.

We   conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards
generally  accepted in the United States of America.  Those  standards
require  that  we  plan  and perform the audits to  obtain  reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence
supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated  financial
statements.    An   audit  also  includes  assessing  the   accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as  well
as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.   We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion, the financial statements referred to  above  present
fairly,  in  all  material respects, the financial position  of  Mater
Dolorosa General Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then  ended
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Metairie, Louisiana
February 20, 2002

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

              INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
              ------------------------------------------

                   AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
                   ---------------------------------



Consolidated financial statements:                      Page
                                                        ----

     Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2001
     and 2000                                             25

     Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years
     Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999              26

     Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners'
     Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000,
     and 1999                                             27

     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years
     Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999              28

     Notes to consolidated financial statements         29-36


Financial statement schedules:

     Schedule XI - Real Estate and Accumulated
     Depreciation                                         39

     Notes to Schedule XI                                 40





All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements
or notes thereto.


<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                      ---------------------------
                      December 31, 2001 and 2000

                                Assets
                                ------

                                              2001           2000
                                              ----           ----

Cash and cash equivalents               $    38,973   $    46,215
Restricted cash                             305,995       365,806
Accounts receivable                          54,382        38,636
Investment in affiliate                           0       (48,006)
Other assets (net of accumulated
 amortization of $819,993 and $751,489)     394,824       388,146
                                        -----------   -----------
                                            794,174       790,797
                                        -----------   -----------
Rental properties at cost:
 Land                                       950,238       950,238
 Buildings and improvements              27,280,952    27,373,551
 Furniture and fixtures                     970,440       776,142
                                        -----------   -----------
                                         29,201,630    29,099,931
Less - accumulated depreciation         (14,365,627)  (13,243,935)
                                        -----------   -----------
                                         14,836,003    15,855,996
                                        -----------   -----------
         Total                          $15,630,177   $16,646,793
                                        ===========   ===========


                 Liabilities and Partners' Equity
                 --------------------------------

Liabilities:
 Debt obligations                       $16,616,789   $16,857,962
 Accounts payable:
  Trade                                   1,423,037     1,321,939
  Taxes                                      21,780        20,465
  Related parties                           481,605       446,202
  Other                                      87,830        10,824
 Interest payable                         2,022,602     1,618,641
 Tenant security deposits                   134,442       168,550
 Advances                                    35,720             0
                                        -----------   -----------
         Total liabilities               20,823,805    20,444,583
Partners' deficit                        (5,193,628)   (3,797,790)
                                        -----------   -----------
         Total                          $15,630,177   $16,646,793
                                        ===========   ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>



                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                 -------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

                                      2001         2000         1999
                                      ----         ----         ----

Revenues:
 Rental income                    $2,434,782  $2,445,698    $2,373,232
 Other income                         11,523           0        10,670
 Interest income                       4,681       6,966         3,677
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
         Total revenues            2,450,986   2,452,664     2,387,579
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
Costs and expenses:
  Rental operations                1,247,800   1,192,754     1,123,015
  General and administrative               0           0       256,142
  Interest                         1,397,720   1,398,919     1,411,077
  Depreciation and amortization    1,190,197   1,178,867     1,229,432
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
         Total costs and expenses  3,835,717   3,770,540     4,019,666
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------

Loss before equity in affiliate   (1,384,731) (1,317,876)   (1,632,087)
Equity in net loss of affiliate      (11,107)    (20,228)      (18,807)
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
Net loss                         ($1,395,838)($1,338,104)  ($1,650,894)
                                  ==========  ==========    ==========

Net loss per limited partnership
 unit:
 Loss before equity in affiliate ($    53.84) ($   51.24)  ($    63.46)
 Equity in net loss of affiliate       (0.43)      (0.79)        (0.73)
                                  ----------  ----------    ----------
                                 ($    54.27)($    52.03)  ($    64.19)
                                  ==========  ==========    ==========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>




                    DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                    ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' EQUITY
        ------------------------------------------------------
         For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999


                                      Dover
                                    Historic
                                    Advisors     Limited
                                     VI (I)    Partners (2)    Total
                                    --------   ------------    -----

Percentage participation in
 profit or loss                       1%           99%          100%
                                      ==           ===          ====

Balance at December 31, 1997      ($194,274)  $1,832,774     $1,638,500
Net loss                            (24,473)  (2,422,819)    (2,447,292)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 1998       (218,747)    (590,045)      (808,792)
Net loss                            (16,509)  (1,634,385)    (1,650,894)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 1999       (235,256)  (2,224,430)    (2,459,686)
Net loss                            (13,381)  (1,324,723)    (1,338,104)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 2000       (248,637)  (3,549,153)    (3,797,790)
Net loss                            (13,958)  (1,381,880)    (1,395,838)
                                   --------   ----------     ----------
Balance at December 31, 2001      ($262,595) ($4,931,033)   ($5,193,628)
                                   ========   ==========     ==========


 (1) General Partner.

 (2)  25,461  limited partnership units outstanding at  December  31,
      2001, 2000, and 1999.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>

                    DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                    ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                 -------------------------------------

         For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999


                                          2001      2000         1999
                                          ----      ----         ----

Cash flows from operating
 activities:
 Net loss                           ($1,395,838) ($1,338,104)($1,650,894)
 Adjustments to reconcile net
  loss to net cash provided by
  operating activities:
 Depreciation and amortization        1,190,197   1,178,867    1,229,432
 Equity in loss of affiliate             11,107      20,228       18,807
 Changes in assets and liabilities:
  Decrease (increase) in
   restricted cash                       59,811        (175)     (84,734)
  (Increase in accounts receivable      (15,746)          0            0
  (Increase) decrease in other assets   (75,183)     (9,447)      12,374
  Increase in investment in affiliates  (48,006)          0            0
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - trade                       65,899      (1,237)     241,400
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - taxes                        1,315       1,668       (1,695)
  Increase in accounts payable -
   related party                         47,674      29,693       19,980
  Increase (decrease) in accounts
   payable - other                       88,827     (40,283)      24,068
  Increase in interest payable          403,961     443,163      304,836
  (Decrease) increase in tenant
   security deposits                    (34,108)     30,866        7,826
  Increase in advances                   35,720           0            0
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
      Net cash provided by
       operating activities             335,630     315,239      121,400
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
 Capital improvements                  (101,699)    (89,844)     (25,416)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
      Net cash used in
       investing activities            (101,699)    (89,844)     (25,416)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------

Cash flows from financing activities:
 Proceeds from debt financing                 0           0       25,416
 Principal payments                    (241,173)   (219,779)    (108,865)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
      Net cash used in
       financing activities            (241,173)   (219,779)     (83,449)
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
(Decrease) increase in cash and
 cash equivalents                        (7,242)      5,616       12,535
Cash and cash equivalents at
 beginning of year                       46,215      40,599       28,064
                                     ----------   ---------   ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end
 of year                             $   38,973   $  46,215   $   40,599
                                     ==========   =========   ==========

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information:
  Cash paid during the year for      $1,397,720  $1,398,919   $1,106,241
interest

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

<PAGE>



                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

              NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
              ------------------------------------------

NOTE A - ORGANIZATION
---------------------

Diversified  Historic  Investors  VI (the  "Partnership"),  a  limited
partnership,  was  formed  in January 1988 to  acquire,  rehabilitate,
renovate, manage, operate, hold, sell, exchange, and otherwise deal in
and  with real properties containing improvements which are "certified
historic structures" as defined in the Internal Revenue Code  of  1986
(the  "Code"),  or which are eligible for the tax credit  provided  by
Section 42 of the Code, and such other uses as Dover Historic Advisors
VI (the "General Partner") deems appropriate, and to engage in any and
all   activities   related  or  incidental  thereto.   Rehabilitations
undertaken  by  the  Partnership were done with a  view  to  obtaining
certification  of  expenditures therefor as "qualified  rehabilitation
expenditures" as defined in the Code.


NOTE B - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
---------------------------------------

A  summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied
in   the   preparation  of  the  accompanying  consolidated  financial
statements follows:

1.   Principles of Consolidation

The  accompanying  financial statements include the  accounts  of  the
Partnership and five subsidiary partnerships ("Ventures") in which the
Partnership has controlling interests, with appropriate elimination of
inter-partnership  transactions  and  balances.   In   addition,   the
Partnership owns a minority interest of 30% in one partnership,  which
it  accounts for on the equity method.  Allocations of income and loss
to  the  minority owners of the Ventures will be made until and unless
the  cumulative losses applicable to the minority interests exceed the
minority  interests  in  the equity capital of  the  Ventures.   These
financial  statements  reflect  all adjustments  (consisting  only  of
normal   recurring  adjustments)  which,  in  the   opinion   of   the
Partnership's General partner, are necessary for a fair  statement  of
the results for those years.

2.   Depreciation

Depreciation  is  computed  using the straight-line  method  over  the
estimated useful lives of the assets.  Buildings and improvements  are
depreciated over 25 years and furniture and fixtures over five years.

3.   Net Loss Per Partnership Unit

The  net  loss  per limited partnership unit is based on the  weighted
average number of limited partnership units outstanding (25,461  units
in 2001, 2000 and 1999).

4.   Costs of Issuance

Costs  incurred  in connection with the offering and sale  of  limited
partnership units were charged against partners' equity as incurred.

5.   Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with
a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents.

6.   Income Taxes

Income  taxes or credits resulting from earnings or losses are payable
by  or  accrue  to  the  benefits  of the  partners;  accordingly,  no
provision   has  been  made  for  income  taxes  in  these   financial
statements.

7.   Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes amounts held for tenant security deposits and
real estate tax reserves.

8.   Revenue Recognition

Revenues  are recognized when rental payments are due on  a  straight-
line  basis.   Rental payments received in advance are deferred  until
earned.

9.   Rental Properties

Rental  properties are stated at cost.  A provision for impairment  of
value  is  recorded  when  a decline in the value  of  a  property  is
determined  to be other than temporary as a result of one or  more  of
the following: (1) a property is offered for sale at a price below its
current  carrying  value,  (2)  a  property  has  significant  balloon
payments due within the foreseeable future which the Partnership  does
not  have the resources to meet, and anticipates it will be unable  to
obtain replacement financing or debt modification sufficient to  allow
it  to continue to hold the property over a reasonable period of time,
(3)  a  property  has  been, and is expected to  continue,  generating
significant  operating  deficits and  the  Partnership  is  unable  or
unwilling to sustain such deficit results of operations, and has  been
unable  to,  or  anticipates  it  will  be  unable  to,  obtain   debt
modification,  financing  or refinancing sufficient  to  allow  it  to
continue to hold the property for a reasonable period of time or,  (4)
a  property's  value  has declined based on management's  expectations
with respect to projected future operational cash flows and prevailing
economic  conditions.   An  impairment  loss  is  indicated  when  the
undiscounted  sum  of  estimated future  cash  flows  from  an  asset,
including  estimated sales proceeds, and assuming a reasonable  period
of  ownership up to 5 years, is less than the carrying amount  of  the
asset.  The impairment loss is measured as the difference between  the
estimated  fair  value and the carrying amount of the  asset.  In  the
absence  of  the above circumstances, properties and improvements  are
stated at cost.  An analysis is done on an annual basis at December 31
of each year.

10.  Use of Estimates

The  preparation  of  the  financial  statements  in  conformity  with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management  to  make
estimates  and  assumptions that affect the amounts  reported  in  the
financial  statements  and accompanying notes.  Actual  results  could
differ from those estimates.


NOTE C - GOING CONCERN
----------------------

The  accompanying  statements have been prepared on  a  going  concern
basis,   which  contemplates  the  realization  of  assets   and   the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown
in  the  consolidated  financial  statements  during  the  year  ended
December  31,  2001,  the  Company  incurred  losses  from  continuing
operations  of  $1,395,838.  The current Company's  total  liabilities
exceeded  its  total assets by $5,193,628. These factors among  others
may  indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as  a  going
concern for a reasonable period of time.

The  Company's  existence  is dependent upon management's  ability  to
develp  profitable operations and resolve its liquidity problems.  The
Company is also currently negotiating flexibility in its payments with
its various lenders, but there can be no assurance the Company will be
successful   in  these  discussions.  The  accompanying   consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might  result
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE D - LEASES
---------------

The  Partnership's  leases with commercial tenants are  classified  as
operating leases.  Leases are generally for a period of three to  five
years and provide for a fixed base rent plus contingent rents based on
level of sales and sharing of certain operating costs.

Minimum  future commercial rentals on operating leases as of  December
31, 2001 are as follows:

                 2002     $677,763
                 2003      353,370
                 2004      247,655
                 2005      208,465
                 2006       70,446


NOTE E - PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
------------------------------

The significant terms of the amended and restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership  (the  "Agreement"),  as  they  relate  to  the  financial
statements, follow:

1.   Capital Contributions

The  partnership offered investors limited partnership units at $1,000
per  unit; the minimum purchase per investor was three units.  A total
of  25,461 limited partnership units was sold.  After payment of costs
of issuance as provided for in the Agreement and the withdrawal of the
initial  limited partner, initial partnership capital net of costs  of
issuance  was  $22,181,070 from limited partners and $9,900  from  the
General Partner.

2.   Distributions from Operations

The  Agreement provides that, beginning with the date of the admission
of  subscribers  as  limited  partners, all  distributable  cash  from
operations  (as  defined)  will  be distributed  99%  to  the  limited
partners  and  1%  to  the General Partner.   After  cash  flows  from
operations are positive, the General Partner shall also receive 4%  of
such cash flows exclusive of interest earned on investments.

All  distributable cash from sales or dispositions will be distributed
to  the limited partners up to their adjusted invested capital plus an
amount  equal  to  the sum of the greater of an 8.5% cumulative,  non-
compounded annual return on the average after-credit invested  capital
or  a  6%  cumulative,  non-compounded annual return  on  the  average
adjusted  invested  capital, plus an early  investor  incentive,  less
amounts  previously  distributed; thereafter,  after  receipt  by  the
General  Partner  or  its affiliates of any accrued  but  unpaid  real
estate  brokerage commissions, the balance will be distributed 85%  to
the  limited  partners  and 15% to the General  Partner.   Terms  used
throughout this paragraph are as defined under the Agreement.

3.   Allocation of Net Income and Net Losses from Operations

Net  income  and net loss (as defined) will be allocated  99%  to  the
limited partners and 1% to the General Partner with certain exceptions
as defined in the Agreement.

The Agreement provides that the fiscal year of the Partnership will be
the  calendar  year  and  that the Partnership  shall  continue  until
December  31,  2038, unless sooner terminated upon the  occurrence  of
certain events.


NOTE F - ACQUISITION
--------------------

The  Partnership  acquired one property and five  general  or  limited
partnership  interests in Ventures during the period from  January  7,
1988  to  December  1988, and one general and one limited  partnership
interest in Ventures in 1989, as discussed below.

In July 1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a 98% general partner
and  a  1% limited partner interest, to a Nebraska limited partnership
which  owns  a building located in Omaha, Nebraska, consisting  of  17
apartment  units,  for a cash capital contribution  of  $700,000.   In
addition,  $128,284 in acquisition costs relating  to  the  investment
were capitalized as part of buildings and improvements.

In July 1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a 90% general partner
interest,  to  a Louisiana general partnership which owns  a  building
located  in New Orleans, Louisiana, consisting of 68 apartment  units,
for  a cash capital contribution of $1,519,000.  In addition, $241,173
of  acquisition  costs relating to the investment were capitalized  as
part  of  buildings  and  improvements.   During  1990,  as  permanent
financing  was  obtained,  $60,000 of  the  capital  contribution  was
returned to the Partnership.

In  December  1988,  the  Partnership acquired  a  99%  joint  venture
interest in a Nebraska joint venture which owns a building located  in
Omaha,  Nebraska, consisting of 23 apartment units, for a cash capital
contribution of $875,000.  In addition, $153,940 in acquisition  costs
relating  to the investment were capitalized as part of buildings  and
improvements.   These  capitalized costs have been  removed  from  the
balance  sheet.  Pursuant to the June 1993 Amended and Restated  Joint
Venture Agreement, the Partnership's interest was reduced to 30%.

In  December  1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a  97%  general
partner  and a 1% limited partner interest, to a West Virginia limited
partnership  which  owned  a  building  located  in  Huntington,  West
Virginia, consisting of 53 apartment units and 41,590 square  feet  of
commercial  space, for a general partner cash capital contribution  of
$1,470,000  and limited partner cash capital contribution of  $10,000.
In  addition, $492,609 of acquisition costs relating to the investment
were  capitalized  as part of building and improvements.   The  lender
foreclosed on the property in October 1994.

In  December  1988, the Partnership was admitted, with a  90%  general
partner  interest,  to  a Virginia general partnership  which  owns  a
building located in Alexandria, Virginia, consisting of 32,544  square
feet  of  commercial  space,  for  a  cash  capital  contribution   of
$1,750,000.   In addition, $436,164 in acquisition costs  relating  to
the  investment  have  been  capitalized  as  part  of  buildings  and
improvements.   In  1990,  the Partnership  made  an  additional  cash
contribution of $196,621 pursuant to an agreement with the  co-general
partner.

In  December 1988, the Partnership purchased 78 condominium units  and
6,700  square  feet of commercial space located in North Carolina  for
$5,042,000.   In addition, $774,258 of acquisition costs  relating  to
the  property  were capitalized as part of buildings and improvements.
On  January  21, 1994, the property was transferred to a  Pennsylvania
limited partnership in which the partnership owns a 99% interest.   On
March  14,  1997, the Registrant was declared in default on the  first
mortgage  for failure to make the minimum monthly payment.   On  March
31,  1997,  a settlement agreement was reached whereby the  Registrant
has  agreed  to  relinquish its partnership interests in  the  limited
partnership in lieu of foreclosure.

In  January  1989, the Partnership was admitted, with  a  98%  general
partner  interest,  to  a Nebraska general partnership  which  owns  a
building  located  in  Omaha, Nebraska, consisting  of  70  apartments
units,  for  a cash capital contribution of $2,250,000.  In  addition,
$448,993  of  acquisition  costs  relating  to  the  investment   were
capitalized as part of buildings and improvements.

In  February  1989, the Partnership was admitted, with a  99%  general
partner interest, to a Pennsylvania limited partnership which  owns  a
building located in Manayunk, Pennsylvania, consisting of 73 apartment
units  and  8,471 square feet of commercial space, for  a  total  cash
capital  contribution  of  $6,000,000, less funds  advanced  prior  to
admittance  ($2,431,552 at December 31, 1988).  In addition,  $664,509
of  acquisition  costs relating to the investment were capitalized  as
part  of  buildings and improvements.  The building  was  subsequently
converted  to a condominium, with the Partnership retaining  title  to
all  property.   During  1990, the Partnership  made  additional  cash
contributions of $220,000.


NOTE G - DEBT OBLIGATIONS
-------------------------

Debt obligations were as follows:                    December 31,
                                                  2001          2000
                                                  ----          ----

Note   payable,   non-interest   bearing;     $  500,000   $   500,000
principal  due  upon  sale  of  property;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Note payable, interest at 7.75% and 9.16%              0         8,784
at  December 31, 1999 and 1998,  adjusted
every  three years, based upon the three-
year  Treasury Bill rate plus  250  basis
points,     payable    in     semi-annual
installments of principal and interest of
$4,856  (payment adjusted  in  accordance
with  interest  rate  changes);  due   in
November 2001; collateralized by  related
rental property.

Note   payable,  interest  at  7.75%   at        323,279       331,957
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively;
payable   in   monthly  installments   of
principal and interest of $3,083; due  in
August  2006; collateralized  by  related
rental property.

Note  payable, interest at 8.5%;  payable        612,116       764,501
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of $17,627; due in April  2005;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Mortgage  loan, interest accrues  at  7%;      4,367,913     4,367,913
interest  only  payable  monthly  to  the
extent  of net operating income;  due  in
December  2008;  collateralized  by   the
related rental property

Mortgage loan, interest at 7.08%; payable      1,849,227     1,880,725
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of  $21,471;  due  in  November
2008;   collateralized  by  the   related
rental property.

Note  payable, non-interest bearing;  due         75,000       75,000
upon sale of property; collateralized  by
related rental property.

Note payable, interest at 10.25%; payable      1,775,053    1,775,053
in  monthly installments of principal and
interest  of $15,540; due in March  2030;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property.

Note payable, interest at 1% accruing  to      1,700,000    1,700,000
principal; unpaid principal and  interest
are  due  upon  sale of  property  or  in
January  2030; collateralized by  related
rental property.

Note  payable, interest at 18%;  interest      1,520,117    1,520,117
only payable monthly to the extent of net
operating  income;  due  December   2002;
collateralized    by    related    rental
property. (A)

Note payable, interest at 7.22%; interest
only  payable  monthly in the  amount  of
$27,206; due January 2009; collateralized
by related rental property.                    3,894,084    3,933,912
                                             -----------  -----------
                                             $16,616,789  $16,857,962
                                             ===========  ===========

The Company is in violations with certain loan convenants with some of
the   underlying  mortgages.  Hence  all  mortgages/notes  have   been
classified as short term.

Maturities of debt obligation at December 31, 2001, were as follows:

          Year ending December 31,
          ------------------------
                 2002              $ 1,520,117
                 2003                        0
                 2004                        0
                 2005                  612,116
                 2006                  323,279
                 Thereafter         14,161,277
                                   -----------
                                   $16,616,789
                                   ===========


NOTE H - RELATED PARTIES
------------------------

In  June 1998, the General Partner advanced the Partnership $77,975 to
pay  certain outstanding liabilities of the Partnership.  The  advance
is non-interest bearing and will be paid out of available cash flow.

Included  in Accounts Payable - Related Party is $378,630 at  December
31,  2001  owed  to  the  co  -  general  partner,  by  three  of  the
Partnership's  Ventures, for additional amounts advanced  for  working
capital  needs.  These advances are non-interest bearing and  will  be
paid out of available cash flow.

Included  in  Accounts Payable - Related Party is $25,000 at  December
31,  2001  owed  to  the general partner, by two of the  Partnership's
Ventures,  for additional amounts advanced for working capital  needs.
These  advances  are  non-interest bearing and will  be  paid  out  of
available cash flow.



NOTE I - INCOME TAX BASIS RECONCILIATION
----------------------------------------

Certain  items  enter  into  the  determination  of  the  results   of
operations in different time periods for financial reporting  ("book")
purposes and for income tax ("tax") purposes.  Reconciliations of  net
loss and partners' equity follow:

                                      For the Years Ended December 31,

                                        2001        2000        1999
                                        ----        ----        ----

Net loss - book                  ($1,395,838)  ($1,338,104)($1,650,894)
Excess of tax under book
 depreciation                        405,107       283,161     458,619
Interest                             114,148       103,804      94,398
Loss on foreclosure                        0             0           0
Gain on sale                               0             0           0
Administrative expenses                    0             0           0
Other timing differences               3,492        20,228      18,807
Minority interest - tax only          95,976        86,705     218,951
                                  ----------    ----------  ----------
Net loss - tax                   ($  777,115)  ($  844,206)($  860,119)
                                  ==========    ==========  ==========


Partners' equity - book          ($5,193,628)  ($3,797,789)($2,459,686)
Costs of issuance                  3,279,930     3,279,930   3,279,930
Cumulative tax under book loss     6,805,198     6,186,474   5,692,577
Investment credit recapture            9,900         9,900       9,900
Rehabilitation credit               (251,117)     (251,117)   (251,117)
                                  ----------    ----------  ----------
Partner's equity - tax            $4,650,283    $5,427,398  $6,271,604
                                  ==========    ==========  ==========



NOTE J- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
-------------------------

Strehlow  Terrace  Apartments  was foreclosed  by  the  Department  of
Housing and Urban Development, the guarantor of the first mortgage, on
April 30, 2002.

On   June  30,  2002, the partnership sold its investment in  Saunders
Apartments for $25,000.

<PAGE>


                       SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION



<PAGE>
                  DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   --------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)



          SCHEDULE XI - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
                                DECEMBER 31, 2001
          ------------------------------------------------------

                                                      Costs
                                                   Capitalized
                                                   Subsequent
                            Initial Cost to            to
                            Partnership (b)        Acquisition
                            ---------------        -----------


                                         Buildings
                                            and              Date of
                 Encumbrances            Improve-  Improve-   Contr.   Date
Description (a)      (e)       Land (b)   ments      ments     (a)   Acquired
---------------  ------------  --------  --------- --------  ------- --------
17 unit apartments
and 3,000 square
feet of retail
space in Omaha, NE $  823,279 $10,000  $ 1,774,986 $   61,868  1988    7/88

68 unit apartments
in New Orleans, LA    612,116    -       2,948,634    471,015  1988    7/88

32,500 square feet
of
commercial space in
Alexandria, VA      6,217,140 540,238    5,014,827  1,336,272  1988   12/88

70 apartment units
in Omaha, NE        3,550,053    -         448,993  5,979,828  1989    1/89

71 unit apartments
and 8,500 square
feet of
commercial space in
Manayunk, PA        5,414,201  400,000     664,508    9,550,461 1989   2/89
                  ----------- -------- -----------  -----------
                  $16,616,789 $950,238 $10,851,948  $17,399,444
                  =========== ======== ===========  ===========

                             Gross Amount at which Carried at
                                    December 31, 2001
                             --------------------------------


                               Buildings                Accumu-
                                  and                    lated
                                Improv-      Total       Depr.
Description (a)       Land       ments      (c) (d)     (d) (e)
--------------        ----     ---------    -------    --------
17 unit apartments
and 3,000 square
feet of retail
space in Omaha, NE  $ 10,000  $ 1,836,854 $ 1,846,854  $  917,938

68 unit apartments
in New Orleans, LA      -       3,419,649   3,419,649   1,741,527

32,500 square feet
of
commercial space in
Alexandria, VA      540,238     6,351,099   6,891,337   2,960,130

70 apartment units
in Omaha, NE           -        6,428,821   6,428,821   2,676,791

71 unit apartments
and 8,500 square
feet of
commercial space in
Manayunk, PA       400,000     10,214,969  10,614,969   4,885,111
                  --------    ----------- -----------  ----------
                  $950,238    $28,251,392 $29,201,630 $13,181,497
                  ========    =========== =========== ===========

<PAGE>

                   DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
                   ---------------------------------
                        (a limited partnership)

                         NOTES TO SCHEDULE XI

                           DECEMBER 31, 2001

(A)  All  properties are certified historic structures as  defined  in
     the  Internal  Revenue Code of 1986.  The "date of  construction"
     refers to the period in which such properties were rehabilitated.

(B)  Represents  costs  of  a  parcel of land with  historic  building
     located     thereon.     Amounts    do    not     include     any
     development/rehabilitation costs incurred pursuant to  a  turnkey
     development   agreement  entered  into  when  the  property   was
     purchased.

(C)  The  cost of real estate owned at December 31, 2001, for  Federal
     income   tax   purposes   was  approximately   $24,696,289.   The
     depreciable  basis  of  the  building  and  improvements  of  the
     properties  has been reduced for Federal income tax  purposes  by
     the historic rehabilitation credit.

(D)  Reconciliation of real estate:

                                        2001       2000        1999
                                        ----       ----        ----
Balance at beginning of year      $29,099,931 $29,010,088 $28,984,672
Additions during this year:
  Improvements                        101,699      89,843      25,416
Deductions during the year:
  Retirements                               0           0           0
                                  ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of year            $29,201,630 $29,099,931 $29,010,088
                                  =========== =========== ===========

Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:
                                        2001       2000        1999
                                        ----       ----        ----
Balance at beginning of year       13,234,935 $12,134,403 $11,038,617
Depreciation expense for the year   1,121,692   1,109,532   1,095,786
Retirements                                 0           0           0
                                  ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of year            $14,356,627 $13,243,935 $12,134,403
                                  =========== =========== ===========

(D)  See  Note E to the consolidated financial statements for  further
     information.

(E)  See   Note  B  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements   for
     depreciation method and lives.

<PAGE>

Item  9.   Changes in and disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
           and Financial Disclosure
           -----------------------------------------------------------

          None.


Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
          -----------------------

          We  maintain  disclosure controls and  procedures  that  are
designed  to         ensure that information required to be  disclosed
in   our  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934   reports  is  recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods   specified
in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and   communicated to our management, including our managing partner's
principal       executive officer and principal financial officer,  as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions  regarding required disclosure.
In    designing   and   evaluating   the   disclosure   controls   and
procedures,   our   management  recognized  that  any   controls   and
procedures,  no matter    how well designed and operated, can  provide
only   reasonable   assurance  of  achieving   the   desired   control
objectives,  and  our  management necessarily was  required  to  apply
its  judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of  possible
controls and   procedures.

          Under  the  supervision of our managing partner's  principal
executive  officer and    principal financial officer we have  carried
out  an  evaluation of the effectiveness of our     adopted disclosure
controls  and procedures as of the end of the period covered  by  this
report.   Based upon that evaluation, our managing partner's president
and  treasurer  concluded that our disclosure controls and  procedures
are effective.

          There  have  been  no significant changes  in  our  internal
controls over financial  reporting that has materially affected, or is
reasonably  likely  to materially affect, our  internal  control  over
financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter.


<PAGE>



                               PART III
                               --------

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant
          ----------------------------------------------

          a.  Identification  of  Directors  -  Registrant  has   no
directors.

          b. Identification of Executive Officers

              The  General Partner of the Registrant is Dover Historic
Advisors  VI  (DoHA-VI),  a  Pennsylvania  general  partnership.   The
partners of DoHA-VI are as follows:


                                  Term of
Name            Age  Position     Office      Period Served
----            ---  --------     -------     -------------

SWDHA, Inc.      --  Partner in   No fixed     Since May 1997
                     DoHA-VI      term

EPK, Inc.        --  Partner in   No fixed     Since May 1997
                     DoHA-VI      term


             For further description of DoHA - VI, see paragraph e. of
this  Item.   There is no arrangement or understanding between  either
person  named above and any other person pursuant to which any  person
was or is to be selected as an officer.

            c.   Identification  of  Certain  Significant   Employees.
Registrant  has  no  employees.   Its administrative  and  operational
functions  are  carried  out  by property management  and  partnership
administration firm engaged by the Registrant.

           d.  Family  Relationships.  There is no family relationship
between or among the executive officers and/or any person nominated or
chosen by Registrant to become an executive officer.

          e.   Business  Experience. DoHA-VI is a general  partnership
formed in 1987.  The General Partner is responsible for management and
control  of  Registrant's affairs and will have general responsibility
and  authority in conducting its operations.  The General Partner  may
retain its affiliates to manage certain of the Properties.

         On May 13, 1997, SWDHA, Inc. replaced Gerald Katzoff and EPK,
Inc.  replaced DHP, Inc. as partners of DoHA-VI.  Spencer  Wertheimer,
the  President  and Sole Director of SWDHA, Inc., is an attorney  with
extensive experience in real estate activities ventures.

         EPK, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed for the purpose of
managing properties or interests therein.  EPK, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary  of D, LTD, an entity formed in 1985 to act as the  holding
company  for  various  corporations engaged  in  the  development  and
management of historically certified properties and conventional  real
estate  as  well  as  a provider of financial (non-banking)  services.
EPK, Inc. is an affiliate of DoHA-VI.

         The officers and directors of EPK, Inc. are described below.

          Spencer  Wertheimer was appointed May 13, 1997 as President,
Treasurer  and  Sole  Director of EPK,  Inc.   Mr.  Wertheimer  is  an
attorney with extensive experience in real estate activities ventures.

          Donna  M. Zanghi (age 43) was appointed on May 13,  1997  as
Vice  President  and  Secretary of EPK, Inc.   Ms.  Zanghi  previously
served  as Secretary and Treasurer of DHP, Inc.  since June  14,  1993
and  as  a  Director  and Secretary/Treasurer  of  D,  LTD.   She  was
associated with DHP, Inc. and its affiliates since 1984 except for the
period from December 1986 to June 1989 and the period from November 1,
1992 to June 14, 1993.

          Michele F. Rudoi (age 35) was appointed on May 13,  1997  as
Assistant  Secretary  of  EPK, Inc.  Ms. Rudoi  previously  served  as
Assistant  Secretary and Director of both D, LTD and DHP,  Inc.  since
January 27, 1993.


Item 11.  Executive Compensation
          ----------------------

           a. Cash Compensation - During 2001, Registrant paid no cash
compensation  to DoHA-VI, any partner therein or any person  named  in
paragraph c. of Item 10.

           b.  Compensation Pursuant to Plans - Registrant has no plan
pursuant to which compensation was paid or distributed during 2001, or
is  proposed to be paid or distributed in the future, to DoHA-VI,  any
partner  therein, or any person named in paragraph c. of  Item  10  of
this report.

           c. Other Compensation - No compensation not referred to  in
paragraph  a.  or  paragraph b. of this Item was paid  or  distributed
during  2001 to DoHA-VI, any partner therein, or any person  named  in
paragraph c. of Item 10.

          d. Compensation of Directors - Registrant has no directors.

          e.   Termination  of  Employment  and  Change  of  Control
Arrangement -
Registrant  has no compensatory plan or arrangement, with  respect  to
any  individual, which results or will result from the resignation  or
retirement  of any individual, or any termination of such individual's
employment  with Registrant or from a change in control of  Registrant
or  a  change in such individual's responsibilities following  such  a
change in control.


Item  12.   Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners   and
            Management
            ----------------------------------------------------------

           a.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial  Owners  -  No
person is known to Registrant to be the beneficial owner of more  than
five percent of the issued and outstanding Units.

           b. Security Ownership of Management - None.

           c.  Changes  in Control - Registrant does not know  of  any
arrangement, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in
a change in control of Registrant.


Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
          ----------------------------------------------

           a.  Pursuant to Registrant's Amended and Restated Agreement
of  Limited  Partnership, DoHA-VI is entitled to 10%  of  Registrant's
distributable cash from operations in each year.  There  was  no  such
share allocable to DoHA-VI for fiscal years 1997 through 2000.

           b.  Certain  Business Relationships  -  Registrant  has  no
directors.   For  a  description  of  business  relationships  between
Registrant  and certain affiliated persons, see paragraph a.  of  this
Item.

           c.  Indebtedness  of Management - No executive  officer  or
significant  employee of Registrant, Registrant's general partner  (or
any  employee thereof), or any affiliate of any such person, is or has
at any time been indebted to Registrant.

<PAGE>


                                PART IV
                                -------

Item 14. (A)     Exhibits,  Financial Statement Schedules and  Reports
                 on Form 8-K.
                 -----------------------------------------------------

                 1.   Financial Statements:

                       a.    Consolidated Balance Sheets  at  December
                 31, 2001 and 2000

                       b.   Consolidated Statements of Operations for
                 the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

                       c.    Consolidated  Statements  of  Changes  in
                 Partners'  Equity  for the Years Ended  December  31,
                 2001, 2000 and 1999.

                       d.    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
                 the Years Ended December 31, 2001 2000 and 1999.

                       e.      Notes   to   consolidated   financial
                 statements.


                 2.   Financial statement schedules:

                       a.    Schedule XI - Real Estate and Accumulated
                 Depreciation

                       b.   Notes to Schedule XI

                 3.   Exhibits:

                (a) Exhibit Number Document
                    -------------- --------

                 3                 Registrant's   Amended   and
                                   Restated   Certificate    of
                                   Limited   Partnership    and
                                   Agreement     of     Limited
                                   Partnership,      previously
                                   filed  as  part of Amendment
                                   No.    2   of   Registrant's
                                   Registration  Statement   on
                                   Form  S-11, are incorporated
                                   herein by reference.

               21                  Subsidiaries     of      the
                                   Registrant  are  listed   in
                                   Item  2. Properties of  this
                                   Form 10-K.

               31                  General   Partners   Opinion
                                   Certification

               32                  Certification Pursuant to 18
                                   U.S.C.   Section  1350,   As
                                   Adopted  Pursuant to Section
                                   906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley
                                   Act of 2002

              (b)  Reports on Form 8-K:

                            On June 27, 2005 the Registrant filed Form
                 8-K  reporting information under items 4.01 and  4.02
                 for the period ending December 31, 2001 and 2002.

            (c) Exhibits: See Item 14 (A) (3) above


<PAGE>

                              SIGNATURES
                              ----------

      Pursuant  to  the requirements of Section 13  or  15(d)  of  the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly  caused  this
report  to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto  duly
authorized.

Date:  March 6, 2006       DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
       --------------
                           By: Dover Historic Advisors VI, its
                               general partner

                               By: EPK, Inc., managing partner

                                By: /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
                                    ----------------------
                                    SPENCER WERTHEIMER
                                    President (principal executive
                                    officer, principal financial
                                    officer)



     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 9, 2006       DIVERSIFIED HISTORIC INVESTORS VI
      -------------

                          By:  Dover Historic Advisors VI, its general
                               partner

                               By: EPK, Inc., managing partner

                                   By:  /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
                                        ----------------------
                                    SPENCER WERTHEIMER
                                    President (principal executive
                                    officer, principal financial
                                    officer)




<PAGE>