alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending October 27, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CSB FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1       | CSB Financial Corporation, Miles, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Citizens State Bank, Miles, Texas. | Newspaper:11/17/2007Federal Register:11/23/2007
|Newspaper:                | 11/17/2007 
|Federal Register:         | 11/23/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 64.47 Type of relief devices. ( a ) An MPT with an internal capacity of more than 550 U.S. gallons must have one or more spring loaded relief valves. In addition, a rupture disc may be attached.
( b ) An MPT with an internal capacity of 550 U.S. gallons or less must have a rupture disc or a spring loaded relief valve.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
ZILA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
THREE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                         JULY 31,
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------
                                                       1996                1995                1994
<S>                                              <C>                 <C>                 <C>          
PRIMARY LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Computation for Statements of Operations -
    Net loss                                       $   (827,337)       $   (862,920)       $   (995,205)
                                                   ============        ============        ============ 

  Weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding                                     24,839,963          24,087,308          23,862,504
                                                   ------------        ------------        ------------ 

  Primary loss per common share                    $       (.03)       $       (.04)       $       (.04)
                                                   ============        ============        ============ 

FULLY DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Computation for Statements of Operations -
    Net loss                                       $   (862,920)       $   (862,920)       $   (995,205)
                                                   ============        ============        ============ 
    Weighted average number of common shares
       outstanding                                   24,839,963          24,087,308          23,862,504
                                                   ------------        ------------        ------------ 

  Fully diluted loss per common share              $       (.03)       $      (.04)        $      (.04)
                                                   ============        ============        ============ 
</TABLE>
Exhibit  32.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTIONS
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the quarterly report
of DGSE Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and


4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
May 14, 2009





By
                /s/ John Benson.John
      Benson, Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DGSE Companies, Inc. and will be retained by DGSE Companies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent No. US 7,222,903 B2 entitled “Spreader Bar Apparatus” issued May 29, 2007. This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Jeffrey DiTullio at U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone: (508) 233-4184 or e-mail:                         *Jeffrey.Ditullio@natick.army.mil*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07-2924 Filed 6-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1997
<CASH>                                             250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      974
<ALLOWANCES>                                       194
<INVENTORY>                                     16,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,081
<PP&E>                                          14,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,484
<SALES>                                         30,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,159
<CGS>                                           14,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    53
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,047)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
98-2139.

#### State v. Leslie.

Hamilton App. No. C-970686. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). See *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570. This cause is therefore dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marco A. Martinez, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

August 9,
2010

/s/ MARCO A. MARTINEZ Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---
§ 61.40-1 General. ( a ) All automatically or remotely controlled or monitored vital systems addressed by part 62 of this subchapter must be subjected to tests and inspections to evaluate the operation and reliability of controls, alarms, safety features, and interlocks. Test procedures must be submitted to the Coast Guard for approval.
( b ) Persons designated by the owner of the vessel must conduct all tests and the Design Verification and Periodic Safety tests must be witnessed by the Coast Guard.
( c ) Design Verification and Periodic Safety test procedure documents approved by the Coast Guard must be retained aboard the vessel.
[CGD 81-030, 53 FR 17837, May 18, 1988, as amended by USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50189, June 12, 2024]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 2, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1412 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1412

   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
develop and implement a system for determining and reporting the number 
 of individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing 
     services under contracts awarded by executive branch agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1995

  Ms. Norton (for herself and Mrs. Morella) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and 
                               Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
develop and implement a system for determining and reporting the number 
 of individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing 
     services under contracts awarded by executive branch agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AND REPORTING NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS 
              EMPLOYED IN PRIVATE SECTOR IN PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER 
              SERVICE CONTRACTS AWARDED BY EXECUTIVE AGENCIES.

    (a) System.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 
develop and begin implementing a system for determining the number of 
individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing 
services under service contracts awarded by agencies in the executive 
branch of the Federal Government.
    (b) Reports.--On the January 1st following implementation of the 
system required under subsection (a), and each January 1st thereafter, 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the 
Congress a report indicating--
            (1) the number of individuals employed by non-Federal 
        Government entities providing services under service contracts 
        awarded by agencies in the executive branch of the Federal 
        Government; and
            (2) the number of individuals employed by non-Federal 
        Government entities, in jobs comparable to those occupied by 
        career Federal employees, providing services under service 
        contracts awarded by agencies in the executive branch of the 
        Federal Government.
    (c) Service Contract Defined.--For the purpose of this section, the 
term ``service contract'' has the meaning given such term in part 37 of 
title 48, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
'O~jdtBF **THE** AmORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS**

: AUSTIN G..Aui 2MANN AllOlln GLllcuL Bmmrablo Coke 'batennon ~mern~r or T6~88 Awtla, Texts8 

### l38u Slrt ;

we have your reqlmltror 8n

Te8Obem8a0118gcl'read8:
Exhibit 3.1

Restated Certificate of Incorporation

[reflecting amendments through December3,  2003]

FIRST. The name of this corporation shall be:

 AURA SYSTEMS, INC.

SECOND. Its registered office in the State of [Delaware] is to be  located at 1424 Centre Road, in the City of Wilmington, county of New Castle  19805, and its registered agent at such address is CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY.

THIRD. The purpose of the corporation shall be:

To engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized  under the General Corporation law of Delaware.

FOURTH. The total number of shares of stock which this corporation  is authorized to issue is: Five Hundred Ten Million (510,000,000) shares of  the par value of $.005 each, amounting to Two Million Five Hundred Fifty Thousand  Dollars ($2,550,000,00), of which Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) shares  shall be Common Stock and Ten Million (10,000,000) shares shall be Preferred  Stock. The Preferred Stock shall have such designations, powers, preferences,  rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions permitted under the General  Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which the Board of Directors of the  corporation may fix by resolution.

FIFTH.  The name and mailing address of the incorporator is as  follows:

Jane S. Krayer

Corporation Service Company

1013 Centre Road

Wilmington, Delaware, 19805

SIXTH. The Board of Directors all have the power to adopt, amend  or repeal the by-laws.

SEVENTH. No director shall be personally liable to the Corporation  or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by  such director as a director. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a director  shall be liable to the extent provided by applicable law, (i) for breach of  the director's duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii)  for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct  or a knowing violation of law, (iii) pursuant to section 174 of the Delaware  General Corporation Law or (iv) for any transaction from which the director  derived an improper personal benefit. No amendment to or repeal of this Article  Seventh shall apply to or have any effect on the liability or alleged liability  of any director of the Corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions  of such director occurring prior to such amendment.
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Kraig.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraig*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1222.]

(No. 97-1285

Submitted December 2, 1998

Decided December 16, 1998.)

On Petition for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Jerry Bernarr Kraig. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report in this court on October 22, 1998, recommending that Jerry Bernarr Kraig be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. No objections to said Final Report were filed.

The court now considers its order of March 4, 1998, indefinitely suspending respondent, Jerry Bernarr Kraig, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2), with credit for time served under the interim suspension in *In re Kraig*(1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 1443, 654 N.E.2d 980. On consideration thereof and the Final Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the respondent, Jerry Bernarr Kraig, Attorney Registration No. 0012813, last known address in Cleveland, Ohio, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $707.65, less the deposit of $500, for a total balance due of $207.65, which costs shall be payable to this court on or before ninety days from the date of this order, by certified check or money order. It is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue as of ninety days from the date of this order, on the balance of unpaid board costs. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, respondent may be found in contempt and may be suspended, until costs, including any accrued interest, are paid in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see *Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraig*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 187, 690 N.E.2d 2.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 4.06-3 Requirements for alcohol and drug testing following a serious marine incident. When a marine employer determines that a casualty or incident is, or is likely to become, an SMI, the marine employer must ensure that the following alcohol and drug testing is conducted: ( a ) *Alcohol testing.* ( 1 ) Alcohol testing must be conducted on each individual engaged or employed on board the vessel who is directly involved in the SMI. ( i ) The alcohol testing of each individual must be conducted within 2 hours of when the SMI occurred, unless precluded by safety concerns directly related to the incident.
( ii ) If safety concerns directly related to the SMI prevent the alcohol testing from being conducted within 2 hours of the occurrence of the incident, then alcohol testing must be completed as soon as the safety concerns are addressed.
( iii ) Alcohol testing is not required to be conducted more than 8 hours after the occurrence of the SMI.
( 2 ) Alcohol-testing devices must be used according to the procedures specified by the manufacturer of the testing device and by this part.
( 3 ) If the alcohol testing required in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) of this section is not conducted, the marine employer must document on Forms CG-2692 and CG-2692B the reason why the testing was not conducted.
( 4 ) The marine employer may use alcohol-testing results from tests conducted by Coast Guard or local law enforcement personnel to satisfy the alcohol testing requirements of this part only if the alcohol testing meets all of the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Drug testing.* ( 1 ) Drug testing must be conducted on each individual engaged or employed on board the vessel who is directly involved in the SMI. ( i ) The collection of drug-test specimens of each individual must be conducted within 32 hours of when the SMI occurred, unless precluded by safety concerns directly related to the incident.
( ii ) If safety concerns directly related to the SMI prevent the collection of drug-test specimens from being conducted within 32 hours of the occurrence of the incident, then the collection of drug-test specimens must be conducted as soon as the safety concerns are addressed.
( 2 ) If the drug-test specimens required in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(ii) of this section were not collected, the marine employer must document on Forms CG-2692 and CG-2692B the reason why the specimens were not collected.
[USCG-2001-8773, 70 FR 75960, Dec. 22, 2005, as amended by USCG-2016-0748, 83 FR 11902, Mar. 19, 2018]