alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending April 11, 2009

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|BEARTOOTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1          | Beartooth Financial Corporation, Billings, Montana to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Beartooth Bank, Billings, Montana.                                                                                                                 | Newspaper:04/08/2009Federal Register:04/10/2009    
|Newspaper:                      | 04/08/2009    
|Federal Register:               | 04/10/2009    
|MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION  | 4c8            | Mackinac Financial Corporation, Manistique, Michigan, proposes to acquire 10% of Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC, Troy, Michigan, and thereby indirectly engage in financial and investment advisory activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:04/27/2009
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | 04/27/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 1, 2007, 11 a.m. to June 1, 2007, 1 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 17, 2007, 72 FR 27828-27830.                

The meeting has been changed to a virtual meeting starting June 7, 2007, 11 a.m. to June 9, 2007, 11 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 21, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2624 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 101 (Friday, May 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Park of American Samoa; Federal Advisory Commission; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act that a meeting of the National Park of American Samoa Federal 
Advisory Commission will be held from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Saturday, 
July 14, 2007, at the National Park of American Samoa visitor center in 
Pago Plaza. The agenda for the meeting will include:
    Welcome and Introductions.
    Request for suggestions for exhibits for the visitor center.
    Request for review of wayside exhibit signs.
    Scoping for opening a trail from Upper Sauma Ridge to the Vatia 
Powerline Trail.
    Report on work that the park has been performing.
    Other Board issues.
    Public Comments on any park issue.
    The meeting is open to the public and the public is encouraged to 
make comments or ask questions. Minutes of the meeting will be 
available to the public after approval of the full Advisory Commission. 
For copies of the minutes, contact the National Park of American Samoa 
Superintendent at 684-633-7082, or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27697774667874525742554e49534249434249536749575409404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0947595a48565a7c796c7b60677d6c676d6c677d4967797a276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Roger Moder,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 07-2598 Filed 5-24-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Aura Systems, Inc. (the "Company")  on  Form 10-K/A for the period ended February 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David  A. Rescino,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  to  my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company  for the periods indicated.

 /s/ David A. Rescino  ------------------  David A. Rescino  Interim Chief Financial Officer  January 9, 2004
# C_2013108EN.01001002.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/10

---

Order of the Court of 17 January 2013 — Verenigde Douaneagenten BVv European Commission

(Case C-173/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 220(2) of the Customs Code - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Incorrect presentation of the facts - Import of raw cane sugar)

2013/C 108/20

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Verenigde Douaneagenten BV (represented by: S. Moolenaar, advocaat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Burggraaf and L. Keppenne, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2012 in Case T-32/11 Verenigde Douaneagenten v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed in part the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 finding that there should be post clearance recovery of import duties and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (REC 02/09)

Verenigde Douaneagenten

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Verenigde Douaneagenten BV are ordered to pay costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Verenigde Douaneagenten BV are ordered to pay costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
United States

Department of

Agriculture Forest

Service White Mountain

National Forest 71 White Mountain Drive

Campton , NH 032 23

Comm: (6 03) 536

- 6100

TTY: (603) 536

- 3665

Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper File Code: 2580

Date: February 18, 2011

Glenn Keith

Deputy Director

Department of Environmental Protection

Bureau of Waste Prevention

One Winter Street, 7th Floor

Boston, MA 02108

Dear Mr. Keith,

In January 2011, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts posted a notice seeking public comment

on Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s (MassDEP) revised draft Regional

Haze State Implementation Plan (RH SIP). The comments herein review the Best Available

Retrofit Technology (BART) component o f the RH SIP. The MassDEP BART describes your

proposal to improve regional haze impacts at mandatory Class I areas across your region. We

appreciate the opportunit y to work closely with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through the

initial evaluation, de velopment, and, now, subsequent review of this plan. Cooperative efforts

such as these ensure that, together, we will continue to make progress toward the Clean Air Act’s

goal of natural visibility conditions at our Class I wilderness areas and parks.

This letter acknowledges that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service

, has

received and conducted a substantive review of your proposed BART

. The Forest Service' s participation in Massachusetts’ administrative process does not waive any le gal defenses or

sovereignty rights it may have under the laws of the United States, including the Clean Air Act

and its implementing regulations. O nly the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can

make a final determination about the document's compl eteness

, and therefore, only the EPA has

the ability to approve the document.

From the perspective of a Federal Land Manager, I have attached the Department of Interior

comments and I concur with their response. I look forward to your response require d by 40 CFR

51.308(i)(3). For further information , please contact Ralph Perron

, Air Quality Specialist, at

(802) 222

- 1444

.Again, we appreciate the opportunity t o work closely with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

.

The Forest Service compliments you o n your hard work and dedication to significant

improvement in our nation's air quality values and visibility.

Sincerely,

/s/ Thomas G. Wagner

THOMAS G. WAGNER

Forest Supervisor

Enclosure

cc: Bret A Anderson

Thomas R Doan e

Ann Acheso n

Charles E Sam s

Anne Arnol d

Anne McWilliam s

Holly Salaze r

Patricia F Brewe r

Tim Alle n

Meredith Bond
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending July 22, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                  | * 3A3         | Western Alliance Bancorporation, Las Vegas, Nevada, to acquire 100 percent of Alta Alliance Bank (In Organization), Oakland, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:08/14/2006
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | 08/14/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 53.01-5 Scope (modifies HG-100). ( a ) The regulations in this part apply to steam heating boilers, hot water boilers (which include hot water heating boilers and hot water supply boilers), and to appurtenances thereto. The requirements in this part must be used in conjunction with Section IV of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 53.01-1). Table 1 to § 54.01-5 of this subchapter gives a breakdown by parts in this subchapter of the regulations governing various types of pressure vessels and boilers.
( b ) (Modifies HG-100.) The requirements of part HG of Section IV of the ASME BPVC must be used except as noted otherwise in this part.
[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65163, Oct. 31, 2008]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 6, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FVNB CORP.        | CIC            | Notice by Mr. Michael Scott Anderson, Dallas, Texas, to own an interest in FVNB Corp., Victoria, Texas, and indirectly acquire First Victoria National Bank, Victoria, Texas. | Newspaper:09/11/2008Federal Register:09/02/2008       
|Newspaper:        | 09/11/2008    
|Federal Register: | 09/02/2008    
|SOUTHWEST BANK    | * Branch       | Southwest Bank, Fort Worth, Texas, to establish a branch at 3707 Camp Bowie, Fort Worth, Texas 76107.                                                                         | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 530.91 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Commission has received OMB approval for this collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended. In accordance with that Act, agencies are required to display a currently valid control number. The valid control number for this collection of information is 3072-0065.
2:15-cv-12169-AC-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 06/15/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 161
#### Page *v.*Ramsdell.

In replevin for a chattel unlawfully detained, a plea of property raises the issue of title, which is not determined by a finding of wrongful detention.

Replevin, for a cow unlawfully detained. Plea of property in the defendant. The referee, to whom the case was submitted, found that the defendant wrongfully detained the cow.

*Barnard $*Barnard, for the plaintiff.

*Pike ft*Parsons, for the defendant.

*576Bingham, J.

Formerly replevin would not lie unless there had been an unlawful taking as well as detention. A plea of property raised the issue of title, and admitted the taking and detention. *Dame*v. Dame, 43 N. H. 39; *Carter*v. Piper, 57 N. H. 217, 219. Subsequently the action was extended to the case of unlawful detention simply, G. L., *c.*245, *s.*2; *Kittredge*v. *Holt,*55 N. H. 622. The effect of a plea of property cannot be different from what it formerly was. It' raises the issue of title, and admits the detention. The referee found that the defendant detained the cow. This had been admitted by the plea. Ownership was the only question in issue, and was not decided. 2 Gr. Ev., *s.*563. The case may be recommitted.

*Case discharged.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TIMIKA KEATHLEY, 

 Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-11888 

 v. DISTRICT JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN 

 

GRANGE INSURANCE MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, 

 

Defendant. 

____________________________/ 

 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL [8] AND GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL [16] 

 On June 30, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff Timika Keathley’s 

first and second Motions to Compel [8][16], at which the Court addressed the parties’ unresolved 

issues as stated in their March 7, 2016 and April 1, 2016 Joint Statements of Resolved and 

Unresolved Issues [20][25]. Also at the hearing, Defendant indicated its intent to withdraw its 

Motion to Extend the Deadline for Fact Discovery [21]. For the reasons stated on the record, IT 

IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s first Motion to Compel [8] is GRANTED IN PART AND 

DENIED IN PART as follows: 

a. Plaintiff’s first Motion to Compel, with regard to the unresolved issue of Defendant’s 

alleged failure to properly search for responsive documents, is GRANTED IN PART.

Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, Defendant will either file an affidavit stating that 

it has produced all responsive documents within its custody, possession, or control and 

that the production is complete, or augment its production to include all responsive 

documents. 

2:15-cv-11888-PDB-MKM Doc # 43 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2255
2 

b. Plaintiff’s first Motion to Compel, with regard to the second unresolved issue of 

Defendant’s improper assertion of privilege, is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s second Motion to Compel [16] with regard to 

the unresolved issue of Defendant’s refusal to provide the home addresses of certain current and 

former employees is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Within fourteen (14) 

days of this Order, Defendant will confirm and provide verification to Plaintiff that it has control 

over and will produce Jason May, Brian Maxwell, Erik Hobson, and Jeanne Strick for trial. If 

Defendant does not have the requisite control over any of these witnesses, Defendant will 

provide the contact information for each such witness to Plaintiff. 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), the parties have a period of fourteen 

days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as 

may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Dated: June 30, 2016 s/ Mona K. Majzoub 

 MONA K. MAJZOUB 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PROOF OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that a copy of this Order was served upon Counsel of Record on this date. 

Dated: June 30, 2016 s/ Lisa C. Bartlett 

 Case Manager 

2:15-cv-11888-PDB-MKM Doc # 43 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2256
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of UniversalAccess Global Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 14, 2004 | /S/ Randall R. Lay                           |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Name: Randall R. Lay                         |
|                           | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Goode, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Goode*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 15.]

(Nos. 98-934 and 98-960

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*David H. Bodiker,*Ohio Public Defender, and *Robert L. Lane,*Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellant.

*16The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.