# Appendix F

Excerpts from Connecticut’s 2 005 Draft Periodic Emission

Inventory (PEI) for Ozone and Carbon Monoxide

• Mobile Source: Aircraft Emission s (2005 PEI Section 3.4 excerpt)

• Mobile Source: Locomotive Emissi ons (2005 PEI Section 3.6 excerpt)

• Area Source: Residential, Commercial and Industrial Fuel Use (2005 PEI

Section 4.5 excerpt)

# F - 1 

# 3.4 AIRCRAFT

Aircraft emissions were calculated using dive rse databases along with other sources of

information. 2005 CT DOT activity reports and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) activity

reports from the largest airports (those with FAA control towers) were considered where

possible. However, Connecticut survey data collected using the form shown in Attachment F-1

generally provided aircraft specific LTOs and were considered to be of higher quality than other

data sources. The airports in Connecticut having control towers are as follows.

• Bradley International Airport

• Danbury Municipal Airport

• Groton-New London Airport

• Hartford-Brainard Airport • Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport

• Tweed-New Haven Airport

• Waterbury-Oxford Airport

Table 3.4-1 provides a comparison between the Federal Aviation Administration’s Terminal

Area Forecast (TAF) Data and available survey da ta. The Terminal Area Forecast System is the

official forecast of aviation activ ity at FAA facilities, which incl udes historical data (years 2004

and earlier) and future forecasts fo r the active airports in the Nati onal Plan of Integrated Airport

System (NPIAS). This includes FAA towered ai rports, federally contracted towered airports,

non-federal towered airports, and many non-towered airports. Airports that provided survey

responses that had significantly different activity than reported in TAF were contacted to confirm

appropriate LTO counts were used in the emissions estimates.

The Bureau used the FAA's Emission and Disp ersion Modeling System (EDMS) version 4.5

software package to estimate emissions. In ma ny cases the EDMS assigned a default engine to

each type of aircraft, and each engine carried defa ult emission factors. Fo r exact survey response

aircraft matches, the EDMS defaults were used. In other cases, research was required to assign

the appropriate engine to the survey response. It is important to note that the engine assignment

and not the specific aircraft m odel that defines the emission factors for each operating mode,

multi-engine aircraft generate pollution at a proportional rate to the number of engines.

Because of the correlation between temperature and pollution production, an effort was made to

seasonally adjust the LTOs at each airport. A nnual, summer (Ozone season) and winter (CO

season) aircraft specific LTO data were obtained from survey results. This enabled the Bureau to

calculate seasonal emissions directly for th ese airports. Connecticut Department of

Transportation inputs were obtained for airports that did not supply seasonal LTO information.

Seasonal adjustments were calculated for hosp ital and non-hospital helic opters and for fixed

wing aircraft. Non-hospital helicop ters and aircraft had increased activity during the summer

and lowest activity in the winter, while hospit al helicopter LTOs appr oximated uniform activity

year round.

The emission rates for aircraft vary at different stages (or modes) of each LTO cycle. The four

LTO modes are Taxi/Idle-out/in, Ta keoff, Climb out, and Approach. Each mode occurs for a

fixed length of time depending on the category of ai rcraft (i.e., jumbo jet, helicopter, turboprop,

etc.). The emission estimates used default tim e-in-mode values provided by the EDMS model.

The EPA default assignment of 26 minutes for Taxi/Idle-out/in was applied to all airports,

including Bradley Intern ational Airport.

# F - 2 

# Table 3.4-2A and 3.4-2B show how the aircraft make and model su rvey results reported to DEP

were matched to the EDMS aircraft/engine model assignments. Table 3.4-2A shows a

consolidation of survey responses into a single common aircraft make model, while Table 3.4-2B

shows composite emission factors of pounds of po llutant per LTO. Table 3.4-2B also shows the

reported survey LTO count for the stated airc raft makes and models. LTO’s were apportioned

when more than one EDMS aircraft/engine m odel combination was assigned to the survey

aircraft make and model. Individual su rveys and web-based sources, such as

www.en.wikipedia.org

, www.risingup.com and www.airliners.net , were used and EDMS

aircraft/engine emission estimates were review ed to ensure reasonable assignments for the

subject survey data.

When available, the default EDMS engine for th e aircraft was used fo r the survey response.

Otherwise, a weighted assignment of engines wa s used. A good example showing this situation

is the aircraft model “ERJ-135” model survey re sponse, which was applied equally to ten engine

types having similar but not identical emission factors listed for the EDMS 4.5 “Embraer ERJ

135/140” aircraft.

Reviewing the table for more extreme examples , it is possible to assess a range of emission

factors assigned to the survey re sults. Looking at the links to the EDMS opti ons available for the

survey response of “Beechjet” in the Table 3 .4-2 of the 2002 Periodic Emissions Inventory

Document, it was possible to see that both th e Beechjet 400 and the Beechjet 400A are two

engine airplanes assigned an EDMS engine model of “JT15D-5 (A & B)” with identical emission

factors. Given that both options provide identi cal results, the percentage of LTOs assigned to

each model would have no impact on calculated emissions, therefore in the processing of 2005

data the entries were co mbined to a single “Beechjet 400” lis ting. Consolidation of these similar

survey responses are shown in Table 3.4-2A. The consolidation of numerous survey response

aircraft make and models into a reduced set of aircraft make and models served to limit the size

of Table 3.4-2B and to clarify interpretation of some of the input s. For example the “Christian

Eagle” was interpreted to be the “Christen Eagle” as the existence of a “Christian Eagle” could

not be demonstrated. In contrast to airplane makes and models having the same emissions, a

single aircraft could use many di fferent engines having very di fferent emission factors. The

survey response of “C-135” pres ents an example of a single ai rcraft having a large range of

emission factors. The survey response of “C-135 ” presents the largest ra nge of emission factors

for linked EDMS airplane makes and models due in part to it being a fou r-engine airplane. The

minimum CO emission factor for “C-135” is 46.451 lb CO/ LTO for the “CFM56-2A SERIES”

engine, while the maximum CO emission fact or for “C-135” is 281.75 lb CO/ LTO for the

“TF33-P-100” engine. In this “C-135” case, the percent applied for each link has an impact to

calculated emissions. 6% was applied to the la rgest emission factor, while the balance of the

percent applied to various emission factors that were lower than the maximum emission factor

yielding a composite emission fact or of 143.86 lb CO / LTO for “C- 135”. Clearly, the emission

factor could vary from 46.451 lb CO/ LTO to 281.75 lb CO/ LTO depending upon the engines

used on the “C-135” performing the LTOs. This largest range of emissi on factors was selected

to illustrate the widest possible difference in emission factors for the purpose of illustrating how

the use of different engines on an airplane can in fluence the emission factor. This difference is

extreme as the next widest range of emission factor s was less than half the range of this “C-135”

# F - 3 

# example. The two examples presented above illu strate that different EDMS assignments choices

available for airplanes may or may not impact emission factors linked to a survey response.

Table 3.4-2B shows the range of emission factors linked to airc raft make and model groups

extracted from survey responses. Table 3.4-2A is not limited to showing aircraft survey

responses having similar emissions. Some c onsolidations in Table 3.4-2A combine engines

having different emission factor s that were derived on a simila r percentage population weighting

system, the “Robinson R-22 Helicopter” would serv e as such an example, while other entries

serve to clarify th e interpretation of the surv ey input based on EDMS 4.5 or information obtained

from web searches.

Table 3.4-2B also shows that the emission factor varies with engine model and number of

engines on the airplane. When the number of engines cannot explain a difference in the

presented emission factors for an engine model, it is usually due to the aircraft having different

time-in-mode values. This is most pronounced when the same engine is used on helicopters and

fixed wing aircraft.

Survey inputs that indicated an aircraft or airc raft engine combination th at were not included in

EDMS 4.5 were either added as a user defined aircraft or matche d to a best available EDMS 4.5

entry or weighted combination ED MS 4.5 entries. User Defined ai rcraft can be identified in

Table 3.4-2B as startin g with two asterisks (i.e. **). **LifeStar (BK-117), **Robinson R-44,

**Sikorsky S76, and **UH-1H Helic opter were User Defined airc raft added to the standard

EDMS 4.5 aircraft options. The number of engine (s) and the associated engine are listed in

Table 3.4-2B for these us er defined aircraft.

Emissions were calculated using a methodology consistent with the 1992 Procedures for

Emission Inventory Preparation Document 4 

# . The EDMS program returned emission estimates

for each mode of operation. Internally, EDMS Mode 1 corresponds to approach, Mode 2

corresponds to climb out, Mode 3 corresponds to takeoff, and Mode 4 corresponds to idle. The

emissions for each mode were combined to obta in a composite emission factor for each LTO,

which when multiplied by the number of LTOs for a given period yields emission results for that

period. The LTO seasonal adjustments and unit c onversions were factored in the following

equation.

Where:

E ij 

# = Total emissions of pollutant i, in pounds per day or tons per year,

produced by aircraft type j for all LTO cycles

LTO j 

# = Annual Landing and Take-Off Cycles fo r aircraft type j. (If summer or

winter emissions were sought, seasonal LTO Cycles for aircraft type j

were used when known or seasonal LTO Cycles for aircraft type j were

calculated from seasonal adjustment f actors when not directly available

from survey data.)

TIM jk



# = Time in mode for mode k, in minutes, for aircraft type j 

# CF/P / e N x EI x1000/ FF x TIM x LTO = E j ijk jk jk j ij

# F - 4 

# FF jk



# = Fuel flow for mode k, in pounds of fuel per minute, for each engine used

on aircraft type j.

EI ijk 

# = Emission index for pollutant i, in pounds of pollutant per thousand pounds

of fuel, in mode k for aircraft type j

1000 = 1000 pounds of fuel per thousand pounds of fuel conversion factor to

balance the units of the equation (i.e. FF jk



# is in units of pounds of fuel per

minute and E ijk 

# is in units of pounds of po llutant per thousand pounds of

fuel, dividing by 1000 lbs/thousand pounds of fuel balances the units of

the equation).

Ne j 

# = Number of engines us ed on aircraft type j

P = Period which is 1 year if calculati ng annual emissions or is the number of

days in Ozone or CO season if calculating a daily emission rate.

CF = Conversion factor for balanci ng units when annual emissions are

calculated, which is 2000 for annua l calculations and 1 for seasonal

calculations. The units for the equation are pounds per day for seasonal

input, but are not tons per year for annual input. Consequently, it is

necessary to divide by 2000 pounds per ton to obtain the desired annual

units of tons per year.

A sample calculation for CO emissions from Gu lfstream II aircraft LTOs at Igor I. Sikorsky

Memorial Airport in Fairfiel d County during the ozone season in 2005 was selected as an

example, since it is powered by two engines (engine model is a Rolls Royce series SPEY

MK511-8), which was included in Table 5-4 of the procedures document. This calculation

cannot be matched to an output in Table 3.4-3, since Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport has

numerous other aircraft traffic. However, a discussion and information comparing the 1992

Procedures Document and EDMS emission results is presented to illustrate how the EMDS

methodology is consistent with the 1992 Procedures.

TIM jk



# for a Gulfstream II jet can be obtained fr om Commercial Carrier Jumbo, long and medium

range jet row of the 1992 Procedures fo r Emission Inventory Preparation Document 4 

# Table 5-1

or via EDMS table AIR_CAT row XCJX and is al so shown on the Engine Emissions Tab of the

EDMS Aircraft Operations & Assignments Form ). The Parameters needed to calculate

emissions were obtained from the 1992 Procedur es Document and EDMS and presented below.

This exercise confirmed consistency between EDMS and the 1992 Procedures Document for the

SPEY MK511-8 aircraft engine.

# F - 5 

# Mode EDMS

4.2

Mode

Number Time

in

Mode

(Min) 1992

Procedures

Document

Fuel Flow

(lb/min) EDMS 4.2 Fuel

Flow

converted

from metric

units from

EDMS Table

ENG_EI 1992

Procedures

Document

CO

Emission

Rate

(lb/1000 lb) EDMS 4.2

CO

Emission

Rate

From Table

ENG_EI

Takeoff 3 0.7 117.86 lb/min 117.86 lb/min 0.12 0.12

Climb out 2 2.2 96.03 lb/min 96.03 lb/min 0.63 0.63

Approach 1 4.0 36.77 lb/min 36.77 lb/min 2.65 2.65

Idle 4 26 16.80 lb/min 16.80 lb/min 31.77 31.77

A sample calculation for CO emissions from Gu lfstream II LTOs at Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial

Airport in Fairfield County during the ozone season in 2005 follows.

E i

j 

# = 500 x [ ( 0.7 x 117.86 /1000 x 0.12 x 2) takeoff

+ ( 2.2 x 96.03 /1000 x 0.63 x 2) climb out

+ ( 4.0 x 36.77 /1000 x 2.65 x 2) approach

+ ( 26 x 16.80 /1000 x 31.77 x 2)] /91 taxi/idle

E i

j 

# = 500 x [ 28.820 ] / 91 All modes combined

Table 3.4-2B presents EDMS composite LTO emi ssion factors. The EDMS composite LTO CO

emission factor for the Gulfstream II is 28.814 lb per LTO, which comp ares well with the 28.820

lb per LTO composite emission factor calculat ed above for all modes combined. EDMS was

developed after 1992 and contains more engines and aircraft that contained in the 1992

Procedures Document. 

# CO day lbs

= E ij 

# 35.158

# TABLE 3.4-1



# Comparison of TAF Database Airports Activity versus Survey Data

(Sorted by TAF Database Activity in Descending Order)

F - 6 

# FAA

Location ID Airport Name TAF

2005 LTO

Estimate 2005

Survey

Response



# BDL Bradley INTL Airport 78,580 78,985

HFD Hartford Brainard 54,981 45,500

DXR Danbury Municipal Airport 39,183 36,596

BDR Igor Sikorsky Memorial 34,741 33,712

HVN Tweed-New Haven 34,029 34,157

GON Groton New London 31,004 28,942

4B8 Robertson Field 29,600 29,550

OXC Waterbury Oxford 28,145 27,823

IJD Windham 15,345 9,025

SNC (1) Chester 10,400 2,410

5B3 Danielson 10,232 12,170

MMK Meriden Markham Municipal 9,014 10,024

22B (2) Mountain Meadow Airstrip 6,530 18

4B9 Simsbury 4,726 5,795

N04 Griswold 1,568 9,914

(1) Chester Airport was previously desi gnated 3B9 but is now designated SNC.

(2) Mountain Meadows Airport closed prio r to 2005 and was not contained in 2005 FAA

listings or web based references other than the TAF database. Mountain Meadows was not

licensed for activity in 2005 and is no longer open to ai rcraft other than helicopters.

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 7 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Adam Jets Jets Adam Jet

Aeronca 7AC Aeronca Champ

Mononca 7AC

AH1 Helicopter Helicopter AH1

Avanti Jets Jets Avanti

Aviat A1 Husky Aviat A1A

Aviat Aircraft Inc Husky A-1A

Aviat Aircraft Inc Husky A-1B

B-727-200 B-727-200A

B-727-200C

B-727-200H

B-727-2SH

B-737-200

Beech B19 Sport BEECHCRAFT BB19 MUSKETEER SPORT (1P)

Beech Bonanza Beech 35

Beech A-36

Beech A36 IO-520

Beech BE-33A

Beech BE35 Bonanza

Beech Bonanza 35

Beech Bonanza U35A

Beech C-33A IO-520

Beech F33A

Beech V-35B

BEECHCRAFT B36T BONANZA (1T)

BEECHCRAFT BE33 DEBONAIR/BONANZA (1P)

BEECHCRAFT BE35 BONANZA (1P)

BEECHCRAFT BE36 BONANZA (1P)

Beechcraft Bonanza

Bonanza’s

Beech King Air 100 BE-99

Beech King Air 100 (PT6A-28)

BEECHCRAFT BE10 KING AIR (2T)

BEECHCRAFT BE99 AIRLINER (2T)

BEECHCRAFT BE9L KING AIR (2T)

BEECHCRAFT BE9T KING AIR (2T)

Beechcraft Kingair F-90

Beech King Air 200 Beech King Air 200 (PT6A-41)

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 8 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Beech King Air 300 Beech King Air 300 (PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG)

BEECHCRAFT BE30 SUPER KING AIR (2T+)

Beech King Air 350 BEECHCRAFT B350 SUPER KING AIR (2T+)

Beech King Air B200 Beech B200 King Air

BEECHCRAFT BE20 SUPER KING AIR (2T+)

Beech Queen Air BEECHCRAFT BE65 QUEEN AIR (2P)

BEECHCRAFT BE70 QUEEN AIR (2P)

BEECHCRAFT BE80 QUEEN AIR (2P)

BEECHCRAFT BE88 QUEEN AIR (2P)

Beechcraft 18 BEECHCRAFT BE18 TWIN BEECH (2P)

Beechcraft D 18

Beechcraft 1900 Beech 1900

BEECHCRAFT B190 1900 (2T)

Beechcraft Baron Barons

BE-58

Beech B-55

Beech Baron

Beech Baron BE55

Beech BE55

Beech E_55

BEECHCRAFT BE55 BARON (2P)

BEECHCRAFT BE56 TURBO BARON (2P)

BEECHCRAFT BE58 BARON (2P)

Beechcraft T-6 Texan BEECHCRAFT T6 0 (1P)

T-6

Beechjet 400 BEECHCRAFT BE40 BEECHJET (2J+)

Beechjet

Beechjet 400 (JT15D-5 (A & B))

Bell 206 Helicopter Bell 206 (250B17B)

Bell 206 B III

Bell 407 Helicopter

Bell Jet Ranger (Rolls-Royce C-20 Engine)

Helicopter Bell 206

HELO

Jet Ranger Helicopter

Single Engine Turbine Heli copter / Bell Jet Ranger

Bellanca Citabria Bellanca 17-30

Bellanca Jets Jets Bellanca

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 9 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Bombardier Global Express Bombardier Global Ex

C 130 Military Jets Jets C 130 Military

Cessna 150 Cessna 140A. Cessna 150 or O-200 equivalent

Cessna 150 (O-200)

Cessna 150H

Cessna 150K

Cessna C-150

CESSNA C150 150 (1P)

Cessna Cessna 150

Piper Cub, Cessna 150 and other 80-125HP

engines

Cessna 152 Cessna 152 O-235

CESSNA C152 152 (1P)

Cessna Cessna 152

Cessna 170 Cessna 170A

Cessna 170B

Cessna 170B 80C

Cessna 170B 88C

CESSNA C170 170 (1P)

Cessna Cessna 170B

Cessna 172 C172

Cessna C-172

Cessna Cessna 172

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO320) Cessna 172 or Piper PA-28 (IO-320-D1AD)

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO-320-D1AD)

Cessna 172 Skyhawk or Piper PA-28 (IO-320)

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO360-B) Cessna 172 RG IO-320

CESSNA C72R CUTLAS (1P)

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (O320) CESSNA 172 - 150 HP LYCOMING

Cessna 172 H

Cessna 172 R&P O-320

Cessna 172, Grumman AA-5b, Piper Cherokee

140 or O-320 Eng Equivalent

Cessna 172B

Cessna 172I

Cessna 172M

Cessna Cessna 172B

Cessna 180 Cessna 180B OBF

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 10 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Cessna 185

CESSNA C180 SKYWAGON (1P)

CESSNA C185 SKYWAGON (1P)

Cessna 182 Cessna 182, Lancair, RV 8 and Bonanza 200-300

HP Engines

Cessna 182-J

Cessna 182Q

Cessna 182RG

CESSNA C82R SKYLANE (1P)

Cessna Skylane

CESSNA 188 CESSNA C188 WAGON (1P)

Cessna 195 Cessna C-195

CESSNA 205 CESSNA C205 205 (1P)

Cessna 206 Skywagon C206

CESSNA C206 SKYWAGON/STATION AIR (1P)

CESSNA 207 CESSNA C207 SKYWAGON/STATION AIR (1P)

Cessna 208 Caravan C-208B

Cesna Caravan

CESSNA C208 CARAVAN/CARGOMASTER (1T)

Cessna Caravan

Cessna 210 CESSNA C210 CENTURIAN (1P)

Cessna Centurion 11 210

CESSNA 310 CESSNA C310 310 (2P)

CESSNA 335 CESSNA C335 335 (2P)

CESSNA 340 CESSNA C340 340 (2P)

CESSNA 404 CESSNA C404 TITAN (2P)

Cessna 414 Cessna 414 TISO-520

CESSNA C414 CHANCELLOR (2P)

CESSNA 425 CORSAIR CESSNA C425 CORSAIR/CONQUEST (2T)

CESSNA C441

CONQUEST CESSNA C441 CONQUEST (2T)

CESSNA SKYMASTER CESSNA C336 SKYMASTER (2P)

CESSNA C337 SKYMASTER (2P)

Cessna T337 Cessna T337 (IO-360-B)

CH-46 Helicopter He licopter CH46

CH-47 Helicopter He licopter CH-47

Challenger Jets Jets Challenger

Cherokee six Piper Saratoga

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 11 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

PIPER P32R LANCE / SARATOGA (1P)

Piper Saratoga T10-540

Single Engine naturally as pirated similar to Piper

Saratoga

Cherokee six or TIO-540

Eq Cessna 172, Cherokee six , TIO-540-J2B2 Eq.

Cherokee six (IO-520/IO-540)

Cherokee Six, Comanche, Mooney M20R or TIO540-J2B2 Eng Eq.

Piper PA32R

Piper Cherokee 6

PIPER P32T TURBO LANCE (1P)

PIPER PA32 CHEROKEE SIX / SARATOGA (1P)

Christen Eagle Christian Eagle

Christen Eagle II Experimental Christian Eagle II

Cirrus SR20 CIRRUS SR20 SR-20 (1P)

Cirrus SR22 CIRRUS SR22 SR-22 (1P)

Citation Jets (Various) Jets Citation (Various)

Comanche Comanche (IO-520/IO-540)

Piper PA 24-250

Piper PA-24 Commanche

PIPER PA24 COMANCHE (1P)

CRJ 701 CRJ-701

Dash 7 / Global Express /

etc. Jets Jets Dash 7 / Global Express / etc.

DHC2 Beaver BEAVER DHC-2 - 450 HP PRATT&WHITNEY

DHC-2 Bealer 450 Hp

Dornier Jets Jets Dornier

Embraer Jets (various) Jets Embraer (various)

ERJ-170 ERJ 170

Falcon 10 Jets Falcon 10

Falcon 20 FA20

Falcon 50 Falcon 50 (3 engine)

Grumman AA 5-A Grumman AA 5-A

Grumman AA 5-B Grumman AA 5-B

Gulfstream II Gulf Stream G II

Gulfstream III Gu lf Stream G III

Gulfstream IV Gulf Stream G IV

Gulf Stream GIV

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 12 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Gulfstream IV-V Gulfstream GIV-V

Gulfstream Jets (Various) Je ts Gulfstream (Various)

Gulfstream V Gulf Stream G V

H-60 Black Hawk H-60

Helicopter UH-60

Helicopter Various Experimental

UH-60A

UH-60D

H-65 Helicopter Helicopter H-65

Hawker 700 or Falcon 50

like Jets Jet Aircraft like Hawker 700 or Falcon 50

Hawker Jets Jets Hawker

Hughes Helicopter 500C Hugh’s Helicopter 500C

Husky Jets Jets Husky

IO-360-B Eng. Eq. Beech C-23, Sundowner, Cessna 172 Skyhawk,

Mooney M20, Piper Cher okee 180 or IO-360-B

Eng. Eq.

Piper Archer

Piper Archer II

Piper 180

Piper 181

Piper 200R

Piper Archer

Piper Cherokee 180

Lear Jets (Various) Jets Lear (Various)

Learjet 35 LR-35

Learjet 35/36 LR-35/36

Learjet 35A LR-35A

Learjet 35B LR-35B

Learjet 60 LR-60

LifeStar American Eurocopter BK-117

BK117 Eurocopter

BK-117 Helicopter

Life Star Helicopter

Lifestar Helicopter

MBB BK-117

Maule Cessna Maule

Maule 180-210-225

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 13 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Maule MT-7-235

Maule MTA

Maule Jets Jets Maul

Mooney M-20 Mooney M20

Mooney M-20C

Mooney Single Engine

Mooney w Textron Engi ne Textron Mooney

Not Listed Hot Air Ballon Take-offs

Navajo (Twin Engine TIO540-J2B2) Navajo (IO-520/IO-540)

Navajo (twin TIO-540-J2B2)

O-320 Eng Eq. Cessna 172 Skyhawk, Grumman AA-5b, Piper

Cherokee 140 or O-320 Eng Eq.

Piper PA 140 Cherokee

Piper PA140 Cherokee

Piper Cherokee 140

P-337P Skymaster (Twin

Engine TSIO-360C) P-337P Skymaster (TSIO-360C)

Pilatus Jets Jets Pilatus

Piper Aztec Aztec (TIO-540-J2B2)

Piper Aztech

PIPER PA27 AZTEC (2P)

Piper Cheyenne PIPER PAY1 CHEYENNE 1 (2T)

Twin Engine Turbine Piper Cheyenne

Piper Cub Piper J-5A Cub

Piper J3-Cub

Piper Cubs

Piper J-3

Piper J3 Cub

Piper J-3 Cub

PIPER PA-11 - 85 HP CONTINENTAL

PIPER PA11 CUB SPECIAL (1P)

Piper PA12

PIPER PA12 SUPER CRUISER (1P)

Piper PA 28-140 Piper PA 28-140

Piper PA 28-161 Piper PA 28-161

Piper PA-18 Supercub PA-18 Supercub 180 Hp

PIPER PA18 SUPER CUB (1P)

PIPER PA-18-180 - 180 HP LYCOMING

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 14 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Piper PA-25 Pawnee Piper PA25

PIPER PA25 PAWNEE (1P)

Piper PA-31T Cheyenne PA-31T Cheyenne

PA-31T Cheyenne (PT6A-28)

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne PA-42 Cheyenne (PT6A-41)

PIPER PA46 MALIBU PIPER PA 46 NMALIBU / MIRAGE (1P)

Piper Seneca Piper PA-34-200

Piper Seneca

PIPER PA34 SENECA (2P)

Piper Warrior Piper Warrior IO-320

Piper Warrior PA-28

Pit Special Jets Jets Pit Special

Robinson R-22 Helicopter Helicopter Robinson R22

R-22 (Helicopter)

Robinson R22

Robinson R-22

Robinson R22 (IO-320-D1AD)

Robinson R22 (IO-360-B)

Robinson R22 (O-320)

Robinson R22 / Sikorski S52

Robinson R-22-R44

Helicopter Robinson Helicopter R22-R44

Robinson R-44 Helicopter Helicopter R44

Robinson Helicopter R-44 Clipper II

Robinson R-44

SAAB 340 SF340

Saberliner 75A Jets Sabreliner

Saberliner

SH-33 Helicopter He licopter SH-33

Sikorsky S-76 Helicopter Helicopter Sikorsky SK 76

Other at JSD Heliport

S-76

S76 Helicopter

Sikorski S-76C+

Sikorsky 76B (S-76B)

Sikorsky S76

Sikorsky S-76

Sikorsky S76 (PT6B-36A)

# TABLE 3.4-2A



# Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order)

F - 15 

# Modified Aircraft Make

Model

Listed in Table 3.4-2 Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before

Modification (Note that only modified names

are listed)

Sikorsky S76 C+

Sikorsky S76 Helicopter

Sikorsky S76B

Sikorsky S-76B N61CP/N22CP Sikorsky S-92

Sikorsky S-76C+

Sikorsky S-92 Helicopter S-92

Sikorsky S-92

Socata TBM 700 Jets TBM

TBM

Stinson Voyager Stinson

Stinson Vorage

Taylor Craft Tailor craft

Tcraft

Twin Comanche PIPER PA30 TWIN COMANCHEE (2P)

Twin Comanche (IO-320-D1AD)

UH-1 Helicopter Helicopter UH-1

Hughie Helicopter

UH-1H Helicopter UH-1H

Ultralights Assorted Ultralights

Ultra Lights

Ultralight

Ultralights, Mixed

Ultralites

West Wind Jets West WindTABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 16Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx328JET1012100Dornier 328JETPW306B21.257 12.546.57330 Shorts14100Shorts 330PT6A-45R23.968 0.6831.19500 Citation (JT15D-1A & 1B)53100500 CitationJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.573550 Citation (JT15D-4 (B,C,D))94100550 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926552 Citation (JT15D-4 (B,C,D))63100552 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926A-10A Thunderbolt II1433100A-10A Thunderbolt IITF34-GE-100-100A236.442 8.841 1.455A-30075350A300-600CF6-80C2A5F227.139 2.116 56.41610A300-B4CF6-80C2A5 (revised)261.597 14.33 56.1310A300-B4JT9D-59A287.964 22.00 54.58610A300-B4-605RCF6-80C2A5228.065 2.469 55.7115A300-600FCF6-80E1A4 Low Emis224.67 1.742 66.2495A300BCF6-80C2A5228.065 2.469 55.7115A300-B4-100CF6-50C2230.269 3.792 52.4045A300-B4-200CF6-50C2230.269 3.792 52.404A-300-600557100A300-600CF6-80C2A5F227.139 2.116 56.416A-300B427790A300-B4CF6-80C2A5228.065 2.469 55.7115A300-600CF6-80C2A5F227.139 2.116 56.4165A300-B4JT9D-59A287.964 22.00 54.586A-310394100A310CF6-80A3232.628 8.003 52.36A3192696100A319CFM56-5B6/P219.93 4.365 18.651A319/A320150A319CFM56-5B6/P219.93 4.365 18.65150A320V2527-A5212.17 0.154 23.722A3202587100A320V2527-A5212.17 0.154 23.722A321888100A321CFM56-5B3/P216.667 3.417 36.861A5355F1 / Eurocopter34100**Sikorsky S76PT6A-36 2 0.705 0.044 1.036Adam Jets140100500 CitationJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.573Aeronca9060Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 17Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx15Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04415Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02210Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Aeronca 7AC202100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Aeronca 7EC91100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Aeronca Chief50100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Aerospatial 320-B500100ATR42PW12025.00403.285Agusta SPA/A109E1100Galaxy (IAI) G200PW306A21.257 11.70 3.086AH1 Helicopter7025AH-1J CobraT400-CP-40020.573 0.044 1.74225AH-1S CobraT53-L-11D24.745.445 1.30125AH-1S CobraT53-L-1324.746.349 1.30125AH-1W Super CobraT700-GE-401 -401C24.365 0.243 2.006All(Mostly Single Engine)150040Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02225Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04420Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06613Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.0222AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022American Champion Aircraft 8K CAB15560Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044Avanti Jets70100500 CitationJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.573Aviat A1 Husky191100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066B-7271834B727-100JT8D-9A321.429 5.159 23.082B-7271833B727-100CTAY 651 (Transply)344.577 5.004 19.77533B727-200JT8D-15319.533 3.086 27.403B-727-20096480B727-200JT8D-15319.533 3.086 27.40310B727-200FJT8D-15319.533 3.086 27.4035B727-200REJT8D-217C328.065027.888TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 18Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx5B727-200RFJT8D-217C328.065027.888B-737-3005293100B737-300CFM56-3-B1228.748 2.006 15.873B-737-400919100B737-400CFM56-3B-2226.411 1.609 18.563B-737-500769100B737-500CFM56-3C-1224.67 1.367 21.208B-737-7005287100B737-700CFM56-7B22217.637 2.094 20.084B-737-8001235100B737-800CFM56-7B26215.587 1.742 27.095B-757533235B757-200PW2037224.67 2.293 35.80335B757-200FRB211-535E4217.791 0.529 51.6325B757-300PW2040223.038 2.072 44.0485B757-300PW2043222.664 1.962 47.7745B757-300RB211-535E4 PHASE 5227.007 0.419 33.0255B757-300RB211-535E4B225.618 0.243 39.3755B757-300RB211-535E4B old com216.909 0.419 65.2355B757-300RB211-535E4B PHASE5225.618 0.243 39.375B-757-200PF917100B757-200FRB211-535E4217.791 0.529 51.632B-76724018B767-200ERCF6-80A2232.628 8.003 52.3618B767-300CF6-80A2232.628 8.003 52.3618B767-300ERPW4060231.879 2.866 62.1718B767-300FCF6-80C2B7F227.183 2.359 54.76318B767-400ERCF6-80C2B8FA227.271 2.359 54.6755B767-200CF6-80C2A5 (revised)261.597 14.33 56.135B767-200CF6-80E1A4 Low Emis224.67 1.742 66.249B767-20015135B767-200ERCF6-80A2232.628 8.003 52.3620B767-200CF6-80E1A4 Low Emis224.67 1.742 66.24915B767-200CF6-80CB42262.567 14.90 49.4515B767-200CF6-80C2A5 (revised)261.597 14.33 56.1315B767-200CF6-80E1A3259.437 16.6084.9B-767-30017134B767-300CF6-80A2232.628 8.003 52.36TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 19Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx33B767-300ERPW4060231.879 2.866 62.1733B767-300FCF6-80C2B7F227.183 2.359 54.763B-767-300E45100B767-300ERPW4060231.879 2.866 62.17Beech A36 Turbine156100Beech King Air 100PT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.838Beech B19 Sport161100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Beech Bonanza6434100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Beech King Air427320Beech King Air 100PT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.83820Beech King Air 200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.77220Beech King Air 300PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94820Beech King Air 350PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94810Beech King Air 90PT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.83810Beech King Air B200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.772Beech King Air 100658100Beech King Air 100PT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.838Beech King Air 200293100Beech King Air 200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.772Beech King Air 300363100Beech King Air 300PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.948Beech King Air 35070100Beech King Air 350PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.948Beech King Air B200215100Beech King Air B200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.772Beech Queen Air1570100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Beech Sundowner, Cessna 172, Mooney, or IO360-B E3982100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.170.2650.066Beechcraft 18144100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Beechcraft 1900274075BH-1900PT6A-67D213.228 4.343 1.14625BH-1900CPT6A-65B211.067 3.571 1.014Beechcraft Baron6457100NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022BEECHCRAFT BE17 TRAVELER/STAGGERWING (1P)70100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.4841.1240.022BEECHCRAFT BE23MUSKETEER/SUNDOWNER (1P)7050Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.170.2650.066TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 20Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx50Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.050.3090.022BEECHCRAFT BE24 MUSKETEERSUPER/SIERRA (1P)70100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.170.2650.066BEECHCRAFT BE60 DUKE (2P)70100NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022BEECHCRAFT BE76 DUCHESS (2P)70100Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.11BEECHCRAFT BE77 SKIPPER (1P)7075Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02225Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022BEECHCRAFT BE95 TRAVEL AIR (2P)70100Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.11Beechcraft Sundowner91100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022BEECHCRAFT T34P MENTOR (1P)7075Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02225Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022BEECHCRAFT T34T TURBOMENTOR (1T)70100Equator P-550 TurboPT6A-2710.926 0.066 0.441Beechcraft T-6 Texan70100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Beechjet 400727100Beechjet 400JT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.926Bell 206 Helicopter5141100Bell 206250B17B11.367 0.198 0.198Bellanca Citabria14134Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02233Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02233Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Bellanca Jets70100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Boeing A75N191100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Bombardier Challenger 30026520CL600CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.49120 CL600SALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.51320CL601-3ACF34-3A214.617 1.433 2.60120CL601-3RCF34-3A214.617 1.433 2.60120CL604CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.491Bombardier Challenger 60026520CL600CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.49120 CL600SALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.513TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 21Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx20CL601-3ACF34-3A214.617 1.433 2.60120CL601-3RCF34-3A214.617 1.433 2.60120CL604CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.491Bombardier Global Express2942100Bombardier Global ExBR700-710A2-20218.6950.7512.28C 130 Military Jets7017C-130 HERCULEST56 series I410.296 1.698 15.96117C-130 HERCULEST56-A-1547.981 3.858 20.0417C-130 HERCULEST56 series III412.037 1.962 19.24617C-130 HERCULES501D22A449.097 21.82 11.04516C-130 HERCULEST56-A-949.414 3.616 15.58716C-130 HERCULEST56-A-16432.893 22.46 10.428C Citation (JT15D-4 (B,C,D))53100C CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926C-135147C-135TF33-P-5&94195.19 199.829.0357C-135J57-P-224128.52 116.126.4557C-135F108-CF-100460.892 2.072 31.2627C-135F103-GE-100 & 1014192.3375.88139.376C-135BTF33-P-74274.78 270.927.0076C-135BF108-CF-100460.892 2.072 31.2626C-135BTF33-P-1004281.75 282.826.1256C-135BTF33-P-102&102A4194.22 198.2256C-135BTF33-P-3/1034156.88 160.022.956C-135BTF33-P3/5/74144.91 155.728.3516C-135BTF33-P-5&94195.19 199.829.0356C-135FRTF33-P-5&94195.19 199.829.0356C-135FRF108-CF-100460.892 2.072 31.2626C-135FRCFM56-2B-1458.952 3.704 38.1186C-135FRCFM56-2A SERIES446.451 2.381 44.5776C-135FRCFM56-2B454.52 3.329 38.537C-150-172-182 Piper 53 PA 28 Stearman PT17 75030Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 22Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxMaule F25Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02215Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04415Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02215Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066C-171034C-17APW2041454.609 5.732110.6933C-17AF117-PW-100448.436 5.467103.9233C-17APW2040446.562 4.189 97.488Canadair Challenger50097CL600CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.4912CL600SALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.5131CL600ALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.513Canadair CL-600/CRT-200120097CL600CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.4912CL600SALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.5131CL600ALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.513Cessna 14020100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Cessna 15012835100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Cessna 152382175Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02225Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Cessna 170819100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Cessna 1721743234Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02233Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04433Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO-320)4087100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO-360-B)6474100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Cessna 172 Skyhawk (O-320)25961100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Cessna 172, Piper Warrior and other 150-180HPLyco365034Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02233Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06633Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 23Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxCessna 180975100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Cessna 1827713100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CESSNA 188140100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Cessna 192Q 9HA10100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Cessna 19590100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CESSNA 20570100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Cessna 206 Skywagon150100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CESSNA 207140100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Cessna 208 Caravan4297100Cessna 208 CaravanPT6A-11410.992 0.066 0.419Cessna 210785100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CESSNA 31070100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022CESSNA 33570100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022CESSNA 34070100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022CESSNA 40470100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Cessna 414670100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Cessna 421 GTISO-5201900100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022CESSNA 425 CORSAIR7020King Air B200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.77220PA-31T CheyennePT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.83820PA-42 CheyennePT6A-41216.38 14.83 0.79420Shorts 360PT6A-65AR210.318 3.064 1.32320Shorts 360PT6A-65R210.428 3.131 1.257Cessna 5501000100550 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926CESSNA C172 SKYHAWK/CUTLASS (1P)28050Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06625Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04425Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022CESSNA C175 SKYLARK (1P)140100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022CESSNA C177 CARDINAL (1P)140100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Cessna C-177RG90100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 24Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxCESSNA C402 UTILILINER/BUSINESSLINER(2P)70100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.2710.022CESSNA C421 GOLDEN EAGLE (2P)70100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022CESSNA C441 CONQUEST70100Cessna 441 Conquest2TPE331-822.094 0.154 1.301CESSNA C77R CARDINAL (1P)140100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Cessna Citation26526551 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.92625552 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.92625552 CitationJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.9266Citation SovereignPW308C213.361.942.8886Citation UltraJT15D-5C225.243 20.01 0.8166Citation VIITFE731-329.083 1.764 1.7426CITATION XAE3007C (Type 1)27.077 1.389 2.161Cessna Citation - Bravo265100Citation BravoJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926Cessna Citation 5001000100500 CitationJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.573Cessna Citation CJ#265100CITATION XAE3007C (Type 1)27.077 1.389 2.161Cessna Citation Excel1265100Citation SovereignPW308C213.361.942.888Cessna Citation V-X500100560 Citation VJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.926Cessna Citation XL26550560 Citation VJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.92650CITATION XAE3007C (Type 1)27.077 1.389 2.161Cessna Skyhawk 172/182600050Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02250Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CESSNA SKYMASTER70100P-337P SkymasterTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.132Cessna T3371957100Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.11Cessna’s 150-152-172-175-182-195100020Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04420Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 25Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxCessna’s 180-206-210-Caravans35075Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02225Cessna 208 CaravanPT6A-11410.992 0.066 0.419CH-46 Helicopter70100H-46E SEA KNIGHTT58-GE-16213.073 3.329 1.698CH-47 Helicopter56180H-53J Pave LowT64-GE-100212.963 4.519 4.80620AH-1S CobraT53-L-1324.746.349 1.301CH-47D2280H-53J Pave LowT64-GE-100212.963 4.519 4.80620AH-1S CobraT53-L-1324.746.349 1.301Challenger Jets7020CL600CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.49120 CL600SALF 502L-2215.212 2.315 2.51320CL601-3ACF34-3A214.617 1.433 2.60120CL601-3RCF34-3A214.617 1.433 2.60120CL604CF34-3B216.094 1.676 2.491Challengers, Citations32450CITATION XAE3007C (Type 1)27.077 1.389 2.16125Citation VIITFE731-329.083 1.764 1.74225S550 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926Cherokee six1317100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Cherokee six or TIO-540 Eq2406100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Chinock C-47D18493H-53D Sea StallionT64-GE-41327.542.734 7.1657H-60 Black HawkT700-GE-70024.634.277 2.227Chinook Helicopter480H-53J Pave LowT64-GE-100212.963 4.519 4.80620AH-1S CobraT53-L-1324.746.349 1.301Chipmunk1100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Christen Eagle5050Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02250Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Christen Eagle II90100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Cirrus SR20140100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Cirrus SR22231100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CITATION I (JT15D-1A & 1B)132100CITATION IJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.573TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 26Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxCitation Jets (Various)8415500 CitationJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.5735550 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265551 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265552 CitationJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.9265552 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265560 Citation VJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.9265C CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265Citation BravoJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265CITATION IJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.5735CITATION I SPJT15D-1A & 1B221.87 8.598 0.5735CITATION IIJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265CITATION II SPJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265CITATION SIIJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.9265Citation SovereignPW308C213.361.942.8885Citation UltraJT15D-5C225.243 20.01 0.8165Citation UltraJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.9264CITATION T-47AJT15D-4 (B,C,D)220.1728.41.4554CITATION VJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.9264Citation VIITFE731-329.083 1.764 1.7424CITATION XAE3007C (Type 1)27.077 1.389 2.1614S550 CitationJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926Citation SII JT-15-D700100CITATION SIIJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926CITATION V (JT15D-5 (A & B))63100CITATION VJT15D-5 (A & B)225.375 26.14 0.926Comanche2054100ComancheTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022CRJ 2003278100REG'L JET 200CF34-3B216.226 1.698 4.762CRJ 701785100Bombardier CRJ700CF34-8C1212.522 0.066 9.348Dash 7 / Global Express / etc. Jets140250Bombardier Global ExBR700-710A2-20218.6950.7512.2850Dash 7PT6A-5045.908 0.7942.91TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 27Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxDash 886725Dash 8-100PW120A25.00403.13125Dash 8-200PW123D23.46104.76225Dash 8-300PW12323.43905.11525Dash 8-400PW12323.43905.115Dassault Falcon 20050050Falcon 20CF700-2D266.624 7.694 0.81650Falcon 2000EXPW308C213.361.942.888Dassault Falcon 50, 200, 900, 200025025Falcon 100TFE731-2210.3843.661.27925Falcon 20CF700-2D266.624 7.694 0.81625Falcon 2000EXPW308C213.361.942.88825Falcon 50TFE731-3313.603 2.646 2.579DC10-101475DC10-10CF6-6K3102.4742.15 76.78710 DC10-10FCF6-6D3102.4742.15 76.7875DC10-10CCF6-6K2399.649 40.65 83.0045DC10-10CCF6-6K3102.4742.15 76.7875DC10-10CCF6-6D3102.4742.15 76.787DC10-30774DC10-30CF6-50C2345.393 5.732 78.5952DC10-30CCF6-50C2345.393 5.732 78.5952DC10-30CCF6-50C2 non-LEFN3142.7955.86 94.2262DC10-30CCF6-50C2R345.525 5.666 73.5242DC10-30CCF6-50C2R non-LEFN3142.7457.91 88.8462DC10-30CCF6-50CA345.525 5.666 73.5242DC10-30CCF6-50E1345.393 5.732 78.5952DC10-30CCF6-50E2345.393 5.732 78.5952DC10-30CCF6-50E2 (non-LEFN)3142.7955.86 94.2262DC10-30CCF6-50E2B345.129 5.688 82.5632DC10-30CCF6-50C non-LEFN3142.7457.91 88.8462DC10-30CF SeriesCF6-50C2345.393 5.732 78.5952DC10-30ERCF6-50C2B345.129 5.688 82.563TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 28Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx2DC10-30FCF6-50C2345.393 5.732 78.595DC8-71F18334DC8-71FCFM56-2B-1458.0043.6634.43633DC8-71FCFM56-2A SERIES445.636 2.337 40.32333DC8-71FCFM56-2B453.638 3.263 34.701DC8-73F8134DC8-73FCFM56-2B-1458.0043.6634.43633DC8-73FCFM56-2A SERIES445.636 2.337 40.32333DC8-73FCFM56-2B453.638 3.263 34.701DC-922120DC9-15FJT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.48420DC9-20JT8D-11239.617 11.86 16.4915DC9-10JT8D-7214.043 4.012 14.4845DC9-10JT8D-7A214.043 4.012 14.4845DC9-10JT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.4845DC9-10JT8D-7series OldCom235.913 11.17 13.585DC9-10CJT8D-7214.043 4.012 14.4845DC9-10CJT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.4845DC9-10CJT8D-7A214.043 4.012 14.4845DC9-10CJT8D-7series OldCom235.913 11.17 13.584DC9-10FJT8D-7series OldCom235.913 11.17 13.584DC9-10FJT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.4844DC9-10FJT8D-7A214.043 4.012 14.4844DC9-10FJT8D-7214.043 4.012 14.4844DC9-10FJT8D-9series OldCom235.362 10.86 14.859DC9-31350DC9-30JT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.48450DC9-30FJT8D-9A214.308 3.417 15.41DC9-31A650DC9-30JT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.48450DC9-30FJT8D-9A214.308 3.417 15.41DC9-3220950DC9-30JT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.48450DC9-30FJT8D-9A214.308 3.417 15.41TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 29Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxDC9-333450DC9-30JT8D-7B214.043 4.012 14.48450DC9-30FJT8D-9A214.308 3.417 15.41DeHavilland Dash 8-1002190100Dash 8-100PW120A25.00403.131DHC2 Beaver212100ComancheTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022DIAMOND DA42 TWINSTAR (1P)140100Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.11DIAMOND DV10 DIAMONDSTAR (1P)140100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066DIAMOND DV20 KATANA (1P)140100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022DIAMOND GA7 COUGAR (2P)70100Twin ComancheIO-320-D1AD221.517 0.419 0.088Dornier Jets7080Dornier 328JETPW306B21.257 12.546.5720Canadair Reg-700CF34-8C1212.522 0.066 9.348EMB-1458350Embraer ERJ 145LRAE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.79825Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A26.46 1.086.925Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A1E213.316 1.213 6.614Embraer Jets (various)2808Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A1E213.316 1.213 6.6148Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A26.46 1.086.98Embraer ERJ 145LRAE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.7987Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 2)210.207 1.742 6.4377Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/328.135 1.455 6.0197Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 3)212.875 1.2575.497Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 1)28.223 1.455 6.3717Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 2)210.5161.726.97Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 3)213.625 1.301 5.8647Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.7986Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 3)213.735 1.345 5.4456Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 2)210.957 1.874 6.2836Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 1)28.642 1.698 5.7985Embraer ERJ 170CF34-8E5A128.907 0.088 10.6924Embraer ERJ 170CF34-8E529.127 0.088 9.811TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 30Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxERJ-135101810Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 2)210.207 1.742 6.43710Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 3)213.735 1.345 5.44510Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 2)210.957 1.874 6.28310Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 1)28.642 1.698 5.79810Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 3)213.625 1.301 5.86410Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 2)210.5161.726.910Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 3)212.875 1.2575.4910Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.79810Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/328.135 1.455 6.01910Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 1)28.223 1.455 6.371ERJ-14034510Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 3)212.875 1.2575.4910Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 3)213.735 1.345 5.44510Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 2)210.957 1.874 6.28310Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A3 (Type 1)28.642 1.698 5.79810Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 3)213.625 1.301 5.86410Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 2)210.5161.726.910Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 2)210.207 1.742 6.43710Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.79810Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1/328.135 1.455 6.01910Embraer ERJ 135/140AE3007A1P (Type 1)28.223 1.455 6.371ERJ-145698234Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A26.46 1.086.933Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A1E213.316 1.213 6.61433Embraer ERJ 145LRAE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.798ERJ-170161650Embraer ERJ 170CF34-8E529.127 0.088 9.81150Embraer ERJ 170CF34-8E5A128.907 0.088 10.692Experimental Exp. Zodiac91100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Experimental Glassair III90100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Experimental GlassAir RG180100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 31Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxExperimental RV 69050Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06650Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Experimental Sonerai II90100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Extra EA - 30045100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022F15/16425F-15F100-PW-100234.965 9.149 19.70925F-15F100-PW-100 (w/AB)241.756 9.149 19.15825F-16F100-PW-100117.483 4.586 9.83325F-16F100-PW-100 (w/AB)120.856 4.586 9.568Fairchild 2420100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Falcon 10335100Falcon 100TFE731-2210.3843.661.279Falcon 20269100Falcon 20CF700-2D266.624 7.694 0.816Falcon 20001056100Falcon 2000EXPW308C213.361.942.888Falcon 502103100Falcon 50TFE731-3313.603 2.646 2.579Falcon 900927100Falcon 2000EXPW308C213.361.942.888Fleet 115100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Grumman A-5A91100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Grumman AA 5-A91100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Grumman AA 5-B91100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Grumman AA-591100Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Grumman Tiger2891100Rockwell CommanderIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Gulfstream II765100Gulfstream IISPEY MK511-8228.814 3.549 16.336Gulfstream II or III323950Gulfstream IISPEY MK511-8228.814 3.549 16.33650Gulfstream IIISPEY MK511-8228.814 3.549 16.336Gulfstream III965100Gulfstream IIISPEY MK511-8228.814 3.549 16.336Gulfstream IV6212100Gulfstream IVTAY Mk611-8219.555 3.197 12.412Gulfstream IV-V50050Gulfstream IVTAY Mk611-8219.555 3.197 12.41250Gulfstream VBR700-710A1-10 GulfV218.585 0.728 12.302Gulfstream Jets (Various)14016Gulfstream IRDa7236.1129.480.882TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 32Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx16Gulfstream IISPEY MK511-8228.814 3.549 16.33616Gulfstream IIISPEY MK511-8228.814 3.549 16.33616Gulfstream IVTAY Mk611-8219.555 3.197 12.41216Gulfstream VBR700-710A1-10 GulfV218.585 0.728 12.30210Gulfstream G350/G450TAY 611-8C221.3190.865.22510Gulfstream G550BR700-710C4-11218.629 1.389 6.085Gulfstream V3497100Gulfstream VBR700-710A1-10 GulfV218.585 0.728 12.302H-352100H-3 SEA KINGT58-GE-8F215.895 9.744 1.455H531220H-53D Sea StallionT64-GE-41327.542.734 7.16520H-53D Sea StallionT64-GE-415211.313.777.56220H-53D Sea StallionT64-GE-6B210.759 2.624 5.44520H-53E StallionT64-GE-100319.445 6.746 7.23120H-53J Pave LowT64-GE-100212.963 4.519 4.806H-60 Black Hawk2954100H-60 Black HawkT700-GE-70024.634.277 2.227H-65 Helicopter70100SH-60B SeahawkT700-GE-401 -401C24.365 0.243 2.006Hawker 400265100Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Hawker 700793100Citation VIITFE731-329.083 1.764 1.742Hawker 700 or Falcon 50 like Jets25100Falcon 50TFE731-3313.603 2.646 2.579Hawker 8001322100Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Hawker 800XP265100Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Hawker Jets14060Citation VIITFE731-329.083 1.764 1.74240Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Hawker XP265100Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Hawkers, Navajos32450Citation VIITFE731-329.083 1.764 1.74225Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.73425NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Hughes Helicopter 500C15050Bell 206250B17B11.367 0.198 0.19850OH-6 Cayuse250B17B12.249 0.4190.22TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 33Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxHusky Jets70100KC-135BJT3D-7 SERIES4268.63 242.528.528IAI Westwind486100IAI WestwindTFE731-329.083 1.764 1.742IAI WW 24300100IAI WestwindTFE731-329.083 1.764 1.742IO-360-B Eng. Eq.12391100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066Kaman H-43 Helicopter72100UH-1N IroquoisT400-CP-40010.309 0.022 0.882Kaman K-1200 Helicopter120100AH-1S CobraT53-L-1324.746.349 1.301Kaman SH-2 Helicopter20050H-2 SEASPRITET58-GE-8F215.895 9.744 1.45550H-2 Super SeaspriteT700-GE-401 -401C24.365 0.243 2.006Lear 45265100Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.279Lear Jets (Various)56170Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.27915Dornier 328JETPW306B21.257 12.546.5715Learjet 24DCJ610-6275.089 8.422 0.772Learjet 24, 31, 45, 55, 60180070Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.27915Dornier 328JETPW306B21.257 12.546.5715Learjet 24DCJ610-6275.089 8.422 0.772Learjet 3590100Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.279Learjet 35/365466100Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.279Learjet 35/36 (TFE 731-2-2B)287100Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.279Learjet 35A46100Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.279Learjet 35B198100Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.279Learjet 60102100Dornier 328JETPW306B21.257 12.546.57Learjet Lear 35-6010075Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.27925Dornier 328JETPW306B21.257 12.546.57LifeStar3224100**LifeStar (BK-117)PT6A-36 2 0.705 0.044 1.036LUSCOMB 8A - 65 HP CONTINENTAL64100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Maule39180Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02210Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06610Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 34Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxMaule Jets70100Air Tractor AT602PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG14.740.728 0.485Maule M-4-220C91100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Maule M7 Turbine (Jet A)30100Air Tractor AT602PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG14.740.728 0.485MD-80483415MD-80JT8D-209215.35.049 22.37715MD-80JT8D-219217.725020.28314MD-80JT8D-217C218.739018.58514MD-80JT8D-219 old comb214.264 4.586 26.91814MD-80JT8D-217 (old comb)214.242 4.497 26.36714MD-80JT8D-217216.27020.19414MD-80JT8D-217A216.27020.194Military Helicopters15036H-60 Black HawkT700-GE-70024.634.277 2.22713H-3 SEA KINGT58-GE-8F215.895 9.744 1.45513SH-3E Sea KingT58-GE-5215.36.967 2.22712H-53J Pave LowT64-GE-100212.963 4.519 4.8067AH-1J CobraT400-CP-40020.573 0.044 1.7427AH-1S CobraT53-L-11D24.745.445 1.3016UH-1N IroquoisT400-CP-40010.309 0.022 0.8823H-2 SEASPRITET58-GE-8F215.895 9.744 1.4553H-2 Super SeaspriteT700-GE-401 -401C24.365 0.243 2.006Misc25020Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04420Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022MOONEY ERCO AIRCOUPE (1P)70100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Mooney Exec.91100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066MOONEY M10 CADET (1P)140100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Mooney M-20336260Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 35Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx20Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022MOONEY M20P ALLEGRO/EAGLE/RANGER(1P)14050Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06650Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Mooney M20R91100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022MOONEY M20T ENCORE/BRAVO (1P)14050Cessna 172 SkyhawkTSIO-360C117.681 0.794 0.06650Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Mooney w Textron Engine240034Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06633Cessna 172 SkyhawkTSIO-360C117.681 0.794 0.06633ComancheTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022MU-300 (JT15D-4 (B,C,D))94100MU-300JT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926Multi Engine Piston93820AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.02220Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.1120NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.02220Twin ComancheIO-320-D1AD221.517 0.419 0.0888FT337PTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.1326337H SkymasterTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.1326P-337P SkymasterTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.132Multi Engine Turbine33010ATR42PW12025.00403.28510ATR42-500PW127E23.63805.02710Beech King Air 200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.77210Beech King Air 300PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94810Beech King Air 350PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94810DHC-8-300PW12323.43905.1158Dash 7PT6A-5045.908 0.7942.915BH-1900PT6A-67D213.228 4.343 1.1465Cessna 441 Conquest2TPE331-822.094 0.154 1.3015Fokker 50PW125-B23.68204.938TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 36Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx5PA-31T CheyennePT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.8385PA-42 CheyennePT6A-41216.38 14.83 0.7945Shorts 330PT6A-45R23.968 0.6831.192Vickers 953 VanguardTYNE474.34 13.97 8.157N2S3 Stearman 220 Hp50076Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06624Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Navajo (Twin Engine TIO-540-J2B2)2081100NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022NAVY N-3-N - 220 HP WRIGHT6476Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06624Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022O-320 Eng Eq.832100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Other M&M (SEL-Piston)172526Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02222Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04420Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02210Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.0222Cessna 172 SkyhawkTSIO-360C117.681 0.794 0.066Other Small BDR Aircraft (assume O-320)86215Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06615Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02210337H SkymasterTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.13210ATR42-500PW127E23.63805.02710AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.02210Beech King Air 300PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94810Cessna 208 CaravanPT6A-11410.992 0.066 0.41910Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.1110Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022P-337P Skymaster (Twin Engine TSIO-360C)86100P-337P SkymasterTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.132Piaggio30066BH-1900PT6A-67D213.228 4.343 1.14634AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 37Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxPilatus Jets140100Air Tractor AT602PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG14.740.728 0.485Pilatus PC-12300100Air Tractor AT602PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG14.740.728 0.485Pilatus PC-12/45727100Air Tractor AT602PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG14.740.728 0.485Piper9150Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04450Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper 1401000100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022PIPER AEST AEROSTAR (2P)70100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Piper Arrow509190Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.0665Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.0225Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044Piper Aztec2273100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Piper Cherokee759234Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02233Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04433Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper Cheyenne44050PA-31T CheyennePT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.83850PA-42 CheyennePT6A-41216.38 14.83 0.794Piper Chieftain91100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Piper Cub708100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Piper Dakota91100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Piper J3C-6560100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Piper Mojave300100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Piper Navajo500100NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022PIPER P28A ARCHER / CADET / CHEROKEE /WARRIOR (1P)224250Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06650Piper PA-28O-320116.050.3090.022PIPER P28B CHEROKEE / CHARGER /PATHFINDER / DAKOTA (1P)224950Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06624Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.7370.1980.04424Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 38Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx2Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022PIPER P28R ARROW (1P)561100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066PIPER P28T TURBO ARROW (1P)280100Cessna 172 SkyhawkTSIO-360C117.681 0.794 0.066PIPER P46T MALIBU / MERIDIAN (1T)140100400A HustlerPT6A-4118.179 7.385 0.419Piper PA 28-1409150Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04450Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA 28-16191100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022PIPER PA16 CLIPPER (1P)7058Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02242Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA186100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022PIPER PA-18 - 150 HP LYCOMING64100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-18 Supercub34257Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06643Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-18-150900100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022PIPER PA20 PACER (1P)7060Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02240Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022PIPER PA22 TRI-PACER/CARRIBBEAN/COLT(1P)70100Piper PA-28O-320116.050.3090.022PIPER PA23 APACHE (2P)70100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Piper PA-25 Pawnee320100ComancheTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Piper PA-2830150Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04450Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-28 (IO-320-D1AD)3063100Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044Piper PA-28 (O-320)3063100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-28 Warrior9150Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04450Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-28-15191100Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-28R20091100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 39Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxPIPER PA31 NAVAJO / CHEIFTAN / MOHAVE(2P)140100NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.2710.022Piper PA-31-350930100NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Piper PA-31T Cheyenne300100PA-31T CheyennePT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.838Piper PA-32R180100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022PIPER PA38 TOMAHAWK (1P)14080Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper PA-42 Cheyenne300100PA-42 CheyennePT6A-41216.38 14.83 0.794PIPER PA44 SEMINOLE (2P)140100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066PIPER PA46 MALIBU140100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Piper Seneca2340100Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.11Piper Warrior1400050Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04450Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Piper’s Cherokee-Arrow-Clipper100030Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02230Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04420Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Pit Special Jets7025Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02225Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06625Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02225Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Powered Para Gliders3000100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Raytheon Hawker800100Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Raytheon Hawker 125-800A/XP-1000A250100Hawker HorizonPW308A211.993 2.161 2.734Robinson R-22 Helicopter3711534Robinson R22IO-360-B113.14 0.176 0.06633Robinson R22O-320115.565 0.243 0.02233Robinson R22IO-320-D1AD112.324 0.154 0.044Robinson R-22-R44 Helicopter15050**Robinson R-44TIO-540-J2B2 1 52.58 0.772 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 40Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx50Robinson R22IO-320-D1AD112.324 0.154 0.044Robinson R-44 Helicopter167100**Robinson R-44TIO-540-J2B2 1 52.58 0.772 0.022Rockwell Commander (O-320)2256100Rockwell CommanderO-320116.05 0.309 0.022RV4-625050Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06650Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.022SAAB 3401527100SF-340-ACT7-524.145 0.617 1.499Saberliner 75A1070100Saberliner 75ACF700-2D266.624 7.694 0.816Schweizer Aircraft Corp Rotor Craft1234Robinson R22IO-360-B113.14 0.176 0.06633Bell 206250B17B11.367 0.198 0.19833Robinson R22O-320115.565 0.243 0.022Searay Experimental250100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022SH-33 Helicopter70100H-53D Sea StallionT64-GE-415211.313.777.562Sikorsky S-61 Helicopter100050H-3 SEA KINGT58-GE-8F215.895 9.744 1.45550SH-3E Sea KingT58-GE-5215.36.967 2.227Sikorsky S-76 Helicopter7160100**Sikorsky S76PT6A-36 2 0.705 0.044 1.036Sikorsky S-92 Helicopter721100H-53D Sea StallionT64-GE-415211.313.777.562Silvaire Luscombe 8F91100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Single Engine919440Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04410Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.0225Cessna 208 CaravanPT6A-11410.992 0.066 0.4195Equator P-550 TurboPT6A-2710.926 0.066 0.441Single Engine BeechcraftBonanza/Sierra/Musketeer50030Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04430Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06630Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02210Cessna 172 SkyhawkTSIO-360C117.681 0.794 0.066Single Engine Cessna 152/172/18260020Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 41Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx20Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04420Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Single Engine Helicopters50030Bell 206250B17B11.367 0.198 0.19815Robinson R22IO-320-D1AD112.324 0.154 0.04415Robinson R22IO-360-B113.14 0.176 0.06615Robinson R22O-320115.565 0.243 0.02215Robinson R22TSIO-360C119.445 0.353 0.06610**Robinson R-44TIO-540-J2B2 1 52.58 0.772 0.022Single Engine Piper Cherokee Series47534Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02233Piper PA-28IO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.04433Piper PA-28O-320116.05 0.309 0.022Single Engine Piston29228Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.02225Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.0445Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.0222Cessna 172 SkyhawkTSIO-360C117.681 0.794 0.066Small Twin Engine Aircraft10060AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.02238Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.112337H SkymasterTSIO-360C235.384 1.631 0.132SN601 Corvette (JT15D-4 (B,C,D))26100SN601 CorvetteJT15D-4 (B,C,D)218.327.760.926Socata TBM 7002353100Air Tractor AT602PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG14.740.728 0.485Socata Tobago (IO-360-B)2256100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066SPARTAN 7W - 450 HP PRATT&WHITNEY64100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022Stinson Voyager1270Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06630Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 42Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOxTaylor Craft275100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Turbine powered helicopters mostly Black Hawks125100H-60 Black HawkT700-GE-70024.634.277 2.227Turboprops like Beech King Air10010ATR42PW12025.00403.28510Beech King Air 100PT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.83810Beech King Air 200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.77210Beech King Air 300PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94810Beech King Air 350PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG29.481.455 0.94810Beech King Air 90PT6A-2821.852 0.132 0.83810Beech King Air B200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.77210Cessna 208 CaravanPT6A-11410.992 0.066 0.41910King Air 200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.77210King Air B200PT6A-41216.336 14.81 0.772Twin Comanche1013100Twin ComancheIO-320-D1AD221.517 0.419 0.088Twin engine aircraft Beech Baron and Piper Aztec150100AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.022Twin Engine Piper Aztec / Seneca / Navajo37534NavajoTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.02233AztecTIO-540-J2B22106.992.271 0.02233Cessna T337IO-360-B224.317 0.4850.11UH-1 Helicopter150100UH-1N IroquoisT400-CP-40010.309 0.022 0.882UH-1H Helicopter6100**UH-1H HelicopterT53-L-13 1 2.381 3.175 0.661Ultralights3245100Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.022Unassigned Itinerant AC/AT Flights BDL105030B757-200PW2037224.67 2.293 35.80330Learjet 35/36TFE 731-2-2B210.3843.661.27914Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A26.46 1.086.913Embraer ERJ 145AE3007A1E213.316 1.213 6.61413Embraer ERJ 145LRAE3007A1/3 (Type 1)28.621.676 5.798Various Experimental Jets GON280100A-10A Thunderbolt IITF34-GE-100-100A236.442 8.841 1.455Various other single engineaircraft N41 Waterbury200020Cessna 150O-20019.193 0.265 0.02220Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-320-D1AD110.737 0.198 0.044TABLE 3.4-2B2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Engine(Sorted by Aircraft Model perSurvey, Percent Applied, EDMSAircraft and EDMS Engine)F - 43Aircraft Make Model SummaryAnnualLTOsPercentApplied EDMS Aircraft EDMS EngineNo ofEnginesEmission Factor(pounds per 100 LTOs)CO VOC NOx20Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.06620Cessna 172 SkyhawkO-320116.05 0.309 0.02220Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022WACO CTO - 350 HP WRIGHT64100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022WACO YKC-S - 300 HP JACOBS64100Cherokee sixTIO-540-J2B2153.484 1.124 0.022West Wind7034IAI WestwindTFE731-329.083 1.764 1.74233Westwind 1TFE731-329.083 1.764 1.74233Westwind 2TFE731-329.083 1.764 1.742Whelan RV-8 SP300100Cessna 172 SkyhawkIO-360-B112.17 0.265 0.066TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 44County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Fairfield CountyBridgeport Hospital Heliport320.00.00.10.10.00.00.0Canal Street Heliport340.00.10.20.00.00.00.0Capt. Cove Sea/Heliport50.00.00.10.00.00.00.0Danbury Hospital Heliport310.00.00.00.10.00.00.0Danbury Municipal Airport36,596135.43,043.812.22,078.421.8494.32.0Flying Ridge Airstrip120.01.60.01.60.00.10.0General Electric Co. Heliport5220.10.81.20.80.00.20.3Greenwich Hospital90.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial33,712176.82,802.3127.41,906.132.0444.623.3Norwalk Hospital Heliport110.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Sikorsky Bridgeport Heliport100.00.10.10.00.00.00.0Sikorsky Helipad2,89334.153.929.643.85.48.74.9St Vincent's Medical Center120.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Stamford Hospital30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0USSC Heliport10.10.00.00.00.00.00.0Fairfield County Total73,883 346.5 5,902.9 171.0 4,031.0 59.2 948.1 30.6Hartford CountyAvon LifeStar EmergencySite90.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Bancroft Airport500.314.70.014.70.01.30.0Berlin LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 45County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Blanchette Heliport160.16.90.02.30.00.40.0Bradley International Airport78,985555.14,674.73,494.94,233.397.8819.5622.2Bristol Hospital Heliport120.00.00.10.00.00.00.0Bristol LifeStar EmergencySite70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Burlington LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Canton LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Clark Hill Heliport450.16.80.00.00.00.30.0East Granby LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0East Windsor LifeStar70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Enfield LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Farmington LifeStarEmergency80.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Glastonbury LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Granby LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Green Acres Airstrip1560.10.70.30.70.00.10.1Hartford Hospital Helipad1,6460.23.75.42.80.00.60.9Hartford LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Hartford-Brainard Airport45,500250.05,001.368.61,594.428.0552.36.6TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 46County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Hartland LifeStarEmergency Site20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Kaman Heliport3924.15.71.33.60.91.30.3Laurie Field200.13.80.01.30.00.30.0Manchester LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Marlborough LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Middlesex MarlboroughClinic160.00.00.10.00.00.00.0Mountain Meadows Airport180.02.90.01.40.00.30.0N B G H Heliport70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Newington LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Otis Elevator Co. Heliport2320.00.40.50.40.00.10.1Plainville LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Rentschler Heliport1120.00.20.30.20.00.00.1Roberts Farm Airport500.14.30.02.90.00.30.0Robertson Field29,55086.72,487.113.71,338.514.0364.42.4Salmon River Airfield5553.2151.40.1103.30.211.60.0Simsbury LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Simsbury Tri-Town Airport5,79510.0471.30.8212.41.360.90.1Skylark's Air Park15,15046.92,207.12.9441.44.3200.80.3South Meadows Heliport500.01.40.00.80.00.30.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 47County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)South Windsor LifeStar20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Southington LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0St. Francis Hospital Heliport860.00.10.20.20.00.00.0Stones Ranch200.50.90.30.90.00.10.0Suffield LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0UCONN Med HurlbrinkHeliport190.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Ultimate Heliport20.00.60.00.60.00.10.0Veterans Home & Hospital40.10.10.00.10.00.00.0West Hartford LifeStar10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Hartford County Total178,551957.815,046.33,590.27,956.2146.62,015.3633.1Litchfield CountyBarkhamsted LifeStarEmergency70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Candlelight Farms Airport1,0353.6167.00.416.60.210.40.0Candlelight Farms Heliport400.00.20.30.10.00.00.0Charlotte Hungerford770.00.20.30.10.00.00.0Docktors Field10.00.30.00.00.00.00.0Good Hill Farm700.313.20.06.50.01.20.0Goshen LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Harwinton LifeStar10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 48County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)EmergencyKent LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Litchfield LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Long View Landing Airport2040.415.20.114.90.12.70.0New Hartford LifeStar90.00.00.00.00.00.00.0New Milford Hospital440.00.10.10.10.00.00.0New Milford LifeStarEmergency60.00.00.00.00.00.00.0North Canaan Airport1,8004.5219.10.33.20.419.90.0North Canaan LifeStar20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Plymouth LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Roxbury LifeStarEmergency Site10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Salisbury LifeStarEmergency Site20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Seavair's Landing Airport1500.314.00.03.40.01.20.0Sharon Hospital Heliport280.00.10.10.10.00.00.0Sharon LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Shingle Mill Heliport200.00.90.02.10.00.10.0Thomaston LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Torrington LifeStar20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 49County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)EmergencyWarren LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Washington LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Waterbury-Plymouth Airport2,9806.8323.30.651.90.734.10.1Whelan Farms Airport9001.567.90.114.40.27.80.0Winchester LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Wings Ago Airstrip30.01.30.00.00.00.10.0Winsted Medical Center90.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Litchfield County Total7,412 17.4 823.0 2.5 113.4 1.6 77.6 0.3Middlesex CountyAetna @ MiddletownHeliport100.00.10.10.00.00.00.0Bemer Heliport120.00.20.00.00.00.00.0Chester Airport2,4109.5250.81.097.11.331.80.1Chester LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Clinton LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Cromwell LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Deep River LifeStar10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 50County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)EmergencyDevil's Hopyard Field2501.566.60.031.60.14.50.0Durham LifeStar EmergencySite80.00.00.00.00.00.00.0East Haddam LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0East Hampton LifeStar80.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Essex LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Fetske Water Strip30.00.30.00.00.00.00.0Goodspeed Airport &Seaplane1,5002.098.10.224.50.211.20.0Haddam LifeStar EmergencySite70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Killingworth LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Maplewood Farm Airport600.13.00.01.00.00.30.0Middlefield LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Middlesex Hospital300.00.10.10.00.00.00.0Middlesex Medical Center370.00.10.10.10.00.00.0Middletown LifeStarEmergency140.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Old Saybrook LifeStar70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Portland LifeStar EmergencySite50.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 51County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Westbrook LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Middlesex County Total4,378 13.1 419.4 1.8 154.5 1.6 47.7 0.2New Haven CountyBristol-Myers Squibb Co.3090.10.91.40.50.00.10.2Griswold Airport9,91414.9596.11.5155.21.768.40.2Hummingbird Heliport1,0000.43.21.91.00.10.50.3Meriden - WallingfordHospital220.00.10.10.00.00.00.0Meriden LifeStar EmergencySite50.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Meriden-Markham Municpal10,02413.8524.64.5363.22.491.80.8Middlebury LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Milford Hospital30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Oxford LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Southbury LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0St. Mary's Hospital Heliport190.00.10.10.00.00.00.0St. Raphael Heliport60.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Tweed-New Haven Airport34,157103.92,312.869.81,590.115.4339.910.3U.S. Surgical RooftopHeliport20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 52County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Wallingford LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Waterbury Hospital Center140.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Waterbury-Oxford Airport27,823138.51,802.5301.71,188.623.2294.451.9Yale New Haven Shoreline10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Yale-New Haven Hospital2480.00.50.70.50.00.10.1New Haven County Total83,552271.55,240.8381.93,299.242.8795.363.8New London CountyBackus Hospital Heliport5030.11.11.50.80.00.20.3Camp Rell300.71.10.41.10.10.10.0Colchester Heliport20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Colchester LifeStarEmergency60.00.00.00.00.00.00.0East Lyme LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Gallup Farm Airport210.13.40.00.10.00.20.0Global Development Facility2760.00.30.50.50.00.10.1Griswold LifeStarEmergency Site10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Groton LifeStar EmergencySite70.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Groton-New London Airport28,942240.12,505.9103.81,565.335.3369.215.2Lawrence & MemorialHospital470.00.00.00.10.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 53County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Lebanon LifeStarEmergency Site20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Ledyard LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Lyme LifeStar EmergencySite10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Mile Creek Airport600.417.60.011.60.01.60.0MPTN Heliport500.00.10.20.10.00.00.0New London LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Old Lyme LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Salem LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Ski's Landing Area60.01.80.01.80.00.20.0Spruce Airport350.13.70.00.80.00.20.0Stonington LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Waterford LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0New London County Total30,009 241.5 2,535.2 106.6 1,582.2 35.4 371.7 15.8Tolland CountyAndover LifeStarEmergency Site10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 54County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Bolton LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Columbia LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Coventry LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Ellington Airport38,22527.31,792.86.91,209.94.0270.40.9Ellington LifeStarEmergency90.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Hebron LifeStar EmergencySite40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Heckler Field1240.15.00.00.00.00.60.0Johnson Memorial Hospital260.00.00.10.10.00.00.0Mansfield LifeStarEmergency80.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Rockville General Hospital160.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Somers LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Stafford LifeStar EmergencySite90.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Tolland LifeStar EmergencySite110.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Valley Farms Airport300.02.20.00.00.00.20.0Vernon LifeStar EmergencySite50.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Willington LifeStar40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 55County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)EmergencyWindward Heights Airstrip50.00.50.00.00.00.00.0Wysocki Airport110.00.00.01.20.00.30.0Tolland County Total38,50027.51,800.77.11,211.34.0271.51.0Windham CountyAshford LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Brooklyn LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0BUELL FARM1200.28.10.00.00.00.60.0Canterbury LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Chaplin LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Danielson Airport12,17029.61,421.04.091.02.197.20.2Day Kimball Hospital470.00.10.20.10.00.00.0Eastford LifeStar EmergencySite20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Hampton LifeStarEmergency20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Killingly LifeStarEmergency Site20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Plainfield LifeStarEmergency30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0TABLE 3.4-3SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILYEMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity)F - 56County / Airport NameAnnualLTOSUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)WINTERDAILY COEMISSIONS(LBS/DAY)ANNUAL EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR)VOC(LBS/DAY)CO(LBS/DAY)NOx(LBS/DAY)VOC(TONS/YR)CO(TONS/YR)NOx(TONS/YR)Putnam LifeStar EmergencySite30.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Scotland LifeStarEmergency Site20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Thompson LifeStarEmergency40.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Toutant Airport50.01.20.00.00.00.10.0Westford Airstrip30.00.30.00.00.00.00.0Windham Airport9,02513.8449.43.0133.81.853.00.4Windham CommunityMemorial620.00.10.20.00.00.00.0Windham LifeStarEmergency50.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Woodstock Airport7501.672.40.136.20.28.20.0Woodstock LifeStarEmergency10.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Windham County Total22,216 45.3 1,952.8 7.7 261.1 4.1 159.2 0.8State Total438,5011,920.633,721.14,268.718,609.0295.34,686.3745.5

# F - 57 

# 3.6 LOCOMOTIVES

Locomotive emissions were determined follo wing guidance contained in the Procedures

Document. Table 3.6-7 presents an estimate for the VOC, NO

x 

# , and CO produced by

locomotives activities for a typical ozone s eason day and annually. Table 3.6-7 also

presents an estimate for the CO produced by lo comotives activities fo r a winter day.

Thirteen companies operated locomotives in 2005:

• 

# Amtrak

• 

# Branford Steam Railroad

• 

# Central New England Railroad

• 

# Connecticut Southern Railroad

• 

# CSX Transportation, Inc.

• 

# Housatonic Railroad Company

• 

# Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company

• 

# Naugatuck Railroad Company

• 

# New England Central Railroad, Inc.

• 

# Providence and Worcester Railroad Company

• 

# Shoreline East Railway

• 

# Springfield Terminal Railway Company (now called Pan Am Railway)

• 

# Valley Railroad Company

CSX Transportation, Inc. is the only Cla ss I company providing freight service within

Connecticut.

Branford Steam Railroad, Central New England Railroad, Connecticut Southern

Railroad, Housatonic Railroad Company, New England Central Railroad, Inc.,

Providence and Worcester Railroad Company, and Springfield Terminal Railway (aka

Pan Am Railway) Company are Class II and II I companies that provide freight service

within Connecticut. Naugatuck Railroad Company and Valley Railroad Company are

tourist attractions that were classified with the same designations as these Class II and III

companies. These two tourist attractions onl y account for 0.4% of the locomotive diesel

fuel usage and are not a significant influence in emissions or in the seasonal distribution

of emissions.

Amtrak, Shoreline East Railway and the Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company

provide commuter and passenger service fo r Connecticut. Amtrak Line Haul

Locomotives are classified under SCC 22-85-002-008 “Line Haul Locomotives

Passenger (Diesel)”, while Shoreline East Railway and the Metro-North Commuter

Railroad Company are classified under 22-85-002-009 “Line Haul Locomotives

Commuter Lines (Diesel)”. While Shoreline Ea st Railway is a subsidiary of Amtrak, the

Shoreline East Railway functions primarily as a commuter line.

Table 3.6-1 provides a tabulation of track mile age usage by diesel line haul locomotives.

The track mileage assignments previously used in apporti oning the locomotive emissions

in 1999 and 2002 Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Pe riodic Emissions Inventories were

# F - 58 

# used with one exception. Hartford County track mileage for CSX Transportation, Inc

was changed from 33.75 to 0 miles. Amtrak ’s Track 10 listed on Reference 15 was

interpreted as showing track rights for both Connecticut Southern Railroad and CSX

Transportation, Inc; consequently CSX Trans portation, Inc had track miles in Hartford

County. Reference 16 indicated that CSX Trans portation, Inc did not ha ve track rights in

Hartford County. CSX Transportation, Inc confirmed that track mileage should only be

applied to Fairfield and New Haven Counties.

Each company that operates locomotives in Connecticut provided an estimate for the

amount of fuel consumed in 2005 in the st ate. Amtrak, Branford Steam Railroad,

Connecticut Southern Railroa d, CSX Railroad, Metro-North Railroad, Springfield

Terminal Railway (aka Pan Am Railway) Comp any and Valley Railroad were the only

railroad companies that reported switchyard activity. Naugatuck Railroad Company data

was not available at the time of this draf t, so 2002 activity data was used calculate

emissions. Total locomotive diesel fuel usage for 2005 was estimated at 4,878,977

gallons based on Connecticut DEP survey results. The Energy Information

Administration (EIA) Fuel Oil and Kerosene Sales 8 

# Table 23 estimates total railroad

distillate fuel use for transportation a nd heating at 3,715,000 gallons. While these

numbers are differ (i.e. energy information numbers are 24% lower than the survey data),

locomotive fuel usage survey results are c onsidered to provide a better estimate of

locomotive diesel fuel usage, especially cons idering Connecticut’s size and the ability for

out of state railroads to refuel outside of Connecticut (i.e. Pr ovidence and Worcester

Railroad Company, CSX Tran sportation, Inc, and Spri ngfield Terminal Railway

Company). See Table 23 of Reference 8 for fu rther information related to transportation

related distillate diesel fuel sales.

The Valley Railroad Company is the only locomotive company in Connecticut that

reported using a coal fired lo comotive. In 2005, Valley Railroad Company used 303 tons

of Pocahontas brand anthracite coal, and 3,056 gallons of diesel fuel, all in Middlesex

County.

The amount of fuel consumed by line haul locomotives in each county annually was

apportioned by track mileage by the following equation (see Tables 3.6-1 and 3.6-2):

Where:

Q = amount of fuel consumed by line haul or switchyard locomotives

by company in each county (gal)

QCT = amount of fuel consumed by line haul or switchyard locomotives

by company in Connecticut (gal)

TMZ = miles of track used by each company in each county (miles)

TMCT = miles of track used by each company in Connecticut (miles) 

# TMCT TMZQCT =Q ×

# F - 59 

# A sample calculation for the quantity of dies el fuel consumed for line haul use by MetroNorth Railroad in New Haven County is:

Q 

# = 567,725 gallons of diesel fuel consumed in New Haven County

The emission factors for both diesel-powered line haul locomotives and diesel-powered

switchyard locomotives were taken from Table 3 of the Technical Highlights

Document 12 

# . Since the Technical Highlights document presented an emission factor for

total hydrocarbons (THC or HC), the value for the Diesel Engine Type was presented in

that Table for Conversion Factors for Hydrocarbon Emission Results in EPA’s

Conversion Factors for Hydrocarbon Emission Components 13 

# was used to convert the

emission factor to provide a VOC emission factor (i.e. 1.053 VOC/THC times the THC

based emission factor yields a VOC emission factor). The emission factors for coal

powered locomotives were obtained from Ta ble 1.2-1 in Compilation of Air Pollution

Emission Factors (AP-42) 10



# .

Locomotives were assumed to operate 5 da ys per week 52 weeks of the year, with

uniform activity throughout the year (i.e. typi cal summer and winter daily emissions are

identical). The seasonal adjustment factor for uniform activity is 0.25 for all four

seasons. The equation used to calculate daily emissions for this category is as follows:

Where:

E = county daily emissions from locomotives (lbs./day)

Q = amount of fuel consumed by locomotives by county

EF = emission factor (lbs./gal)

SF = seasonal adjustment factor (%/100)

DAYS = activity days per week (5 days)

13 = 52 weeks per year divided by 4 seasons is 13 weeks per season

A sample calculation for the VOC emissions from Metro-North line haul locomotives in

New Haven County is:

E = 48.0 lb. VOC per day

Calculated emissions are presen ted in Tables 3.6-4, 3.6-5, 3.6-6, 3.6-7 and 3.6-8. 

# 51.2 6 27.06 1,075,446 =Q ×

13DAYS SFEFQ =E

× × ×



# 135 0.25 0.022 567,725

=E

× × ×

# Table 3.6-1

2005 DIESEL LINE HAUL LOCO MOTIVES TRACK MILEAGE

IN EACH COUNTY BY COMPANY

F - 60 

# Railroad

Company

Name Track Rights for Each Connecticut County Railroa

d Total

for

State Fairfiel

d Hartfor

d Litchfiel

d Middlese

x New

Haven New

London Tollan

d Windha

m

Amtrak 0.00 33.90 0.00 11.60 38.90 33.90 0.00 0.00 118.30

Branford

Steam

Railroad 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5.00

Central

New

England

Railroad 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.75

Connectic

ut

Southern

Railroad 0 39 0 0 19 0 0 0 58.00

CSX

Railroad 39.38 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 69.38

Housatoni

c Railroad

Company 36 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 82.00

MetroNorth

Commuter

Railroad

Company 24.2 0 0 0 27.06 0 0 0 51.26

Naugatuc

k Railroad

Company 0 0 15.5 0 4.1 0 0 0 19.60

New

England

Central

Railroad,

Inc 0 0 0 0 0 23 23.2 7 53.20

Providenc

e and

Worcester

Railroad

Company 72.4 0 0 17.1 58.2 73.5 0 46.2 267.40

Shoreline

East

Railway 0 0 0 10 21.8 0 0 0 31.80

# Table 3.6-1

2005 DIESEL LINE HAUL LOCO MOTIVES TRACK MILEAGE

IN EACH COUNTY BY COMPANY

F - 61 

# Springfield

Terminal

Railway

Company 0 18.4 24.1 0 28.5 0 0 0 71.00

Valley

Railroad

Company 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 13.00

All

Railroads 171.9

8 95.05 85.60 51.70 232.5

6 130.40 23.20 53.20 843.69

# Table 3.6-2

2005 GALLONS OF DIESEL FU EL USE FOR LINE HAUL

LOCOMOTIVES BY COMPANY AND COUNTY APPORTIONED

BASED ON TRACK RIGHT MILAGE IN EACH COUNTY

F - 62 

# Railroad

Company Fairfiel

d Hartfor

d Litchfiel

d Middlese

x New

Haven New

Londo

n Tollan

d Windha

m Railroad

State

Total

Amtrak 362,77

6 124,136 416,283 362,77

6 1,265,97

1

Branford

Steam

Railroad 29,358 29,358

Central

New

England

Railroad 28,214 28,214

Connectic

ut

Southern

Railroad 174,47

8 85,002 259,480

CSX

Railroad 146,41

5 111,555 257,970

Housatoni

c Railroad

Company 62,512 79,876 142,387

MetroNorth

Commuter

Railroad

Company 507,72

1 567,725 1,075,44

6

Naugatuc

k Railroad

Company 11,307 2,991 14,298

New

England

Central

Railroad,

Inc 74,007 74,65

0 22,524 171,181

Providenc

e and

Worcester

Railroad

Company 130,60

8 30,848 104,991 132,59

2 83,344 482,382

Shoreline

East

Railway 252,229 549,858 802,087

# Table 3.6-2

2005 GALLONS OF DIESEL FU EL USE FOR LINE HAUL

LOCOMOTIVES BY COMPANY AND COUNTY APPORTIONED

BASED ON TRACK RIGHT MILAGE IN EACH COUNTY

F - 63 

# Springfiel

d Terminal

Railway

Company 3,537 4,633 5,479 13,650

Valley

Railroad

Company 2,636 2,636

Line Haul

Total 847,25

6 569,00

5 95,816 409,848 1,873,2

42 569,37

5 74,65

0 105,86

7 4,545,06

0

# F - 64 

# Table 3.6-3

2005 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL USED BE EACH COMPANY

FOR SWITCHYARD LOCOMO TIVES IN EACH COUNTY

County Fairfield Hartford Middlesex New Haven Railroad

State Total

Amtrak 0 0 0 75,679 75,679

Branford Steam Railroad 0 0 0 16,148 16,148

Connecticut Southern

Railroad 0 93,027 0 0 93,027

CSX Railroad 14,032 0 0 14,032 28,065

Metro-North Commuter

Railroad Company 97,179 0 0 0 97,179

Springfield Terminal

Railway Company 0 11,700 0 11,700 23,400

Valley Railroad Company 0 0 420 0 420

Total Switchyard 111,211 104,727 420 117,559 333,917



# TABLE 3.6-4

2005 SUMMARY OF DIESEL LINE HA UL LOCOMOTIVES EMISSIONS

BY COUNTY

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS)

County CO

(lbs/day) VOC

(lbs/day) NOx

(lbs/day)

Fairfield 191.10 75.65 1,939.69

Hartford 128.34 50.80 1,302.67

Litchfield 21.61 8.56 219.36

Middlesex 92.44 36.59 938.30

New Haven 422.50 167.25 4,288.56

New London 128.42 50.84 1,303.51

Tolland 16.84 6.67 170.90

Windham 23.88 9.45 242.37

State Total 1,025.12 405.81 10,405.36

# F - 65 

# TABLE 3.6-5

2005 SUMMARY OF DIESEL POWERED SWITCHYARD

LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS BY COUNTY

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS)

County CO

(lbs/day) VOC

(lbs/day) NOx

(lbs/day)

Fairfield 35.93 20.85 341.36

Hartford 33.83 19.64 321.45

Middlesex 0.14 0.08 1.29

New Haven 37.98 22.04 360.84

STATE TOTAL 107.87 62.61 1,024.95



# TABLE 3.6-6

2005 SUMMARY OF COAL POWERE D LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS)

CO VOC NOx

County (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day)

Middlesex 104.89 20.98 3.50

STATE TOTAL 104.89 20.98 3.50



# TABLE 3.6-7

2005 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS

FROM LOCOMOTIVES

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS)

County Daily CO

(lbs/day) Daily VOC

(lbs/day) Daily NOx

(lbs/day) Annual CO

(tons/year) Annual VOC

(tons/year) Annual NOx

(tons/year)

Fairfield 227.02 96.50 2,281.05 29.51 12.54 296.54

Hartford 162.17 70.44 1,624.12 21.08 9.16 211.14

Litchfield 21.61 8.56 219.36 2.81 1.11 28.52

Middlesex 197.46 57.65 943. 08 25.67 7.49 122.60

New Haven 460.48 189.30 4,649.40 59.86 24.61 604.42

New London 128.42 50.84 1,303.51 16.69 6.61 169.46

Tolland 16.84 6.67 170.90 2.19 0.87 22.22

Windham 23.88 9.45 242.37 3.10 1.23 31.51

TOTAL 1,237.88 489.40 11,433.80 160.92 63.62 1,486.39

# F - 66 

# TABLE 3.6-8

2005 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS

FROM LOCOMOTIVES BY USE AND COUNTY

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS)



# Locomotive Use /

County Daily

CO

(lbs/day) Daily

VOC

(lbs/day) Daily

NOx

(lbs/day) Annual

CO

(tons/year) Annual

VOC

(tons/year) Annual

NOx

(tons/year)

Commuter Rail

Fairfield 146 64 1,461 19 8.3 190

Hartford 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Litchfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Middlesex 57 23 577 7 2.9 75

New Haven 252 100 2,559 33 13.0 333

New London 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Commuter Rail Total: 455 186 4,597 59 24.2 598



# Passenger Rail

Fairfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Hartford 82 32 831 11 4.2 108

Litchfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Middlesex 28 11 284 4 1.4 37

New Haven 118 51 1,185 15 6.7 154

New London 82 32 831 11 4.2 108

Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0



# Passenger Rail

Total: 310 127 3,131 40 16.5 407

Entertainment Rail



# Fairfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Hartford 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Litchfield (*) 3 (*) 1 (*) 26 0 0.1 3

Middlesex (*) 106 (*) 21 (*) 11 14 2.8 1

New Haven (*) 1 (*) 0 (*) 7 0 0.0 1

New London 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Entertainment Rail

Total: (*) 109 (*) 23 (*) 44 14 2.9 6

# F - 67 

# TABLE 3.6-8 (Continued)

2005 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS

FROM LOCOMOTIVES BY USE AND COUNTY

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS)



# Locomotive Use /

County Daily

CO

(lbs/day) Daily

VOC

(lbs/day) Daily

NOx

(lbs/day) Annual

CO

(tons/year) Annual

VOC

(tons/year) Annual

NOx

(tons/year)

Freight Class I



# Fairfield 38 16 378 5 2.0 49

Hartford 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Litchfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Middlesex 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

New Haven 30 13 298 4 1.6 39

New London 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Freight Class I

Total: 67 28 677 9 3.7 88

Freight Class II /

III



# Fairfield 44 17 442 6 2.2 57

Hartford 80 38 794 10 4.9 103

Litchfield 19 8 193 2 1.0 25

Middlesex 7 3 71 1 0.4 9

New Haven 60 25 600 8 3.3 78

New London 47 18 473 6 2.4 61

Tolland 17 7 171 2 0.9 22

Windham 24 9 242 3 1.2 32

Freight Class II /

III Total 297 125 2,986 39 16.3 388

STATE TOTAL 1,238 489 11,434 161 63.6 1,486

(*) Daily estimates for Entertainment contribution are based on the uniform activity assumption stated in

the analytic method description. The activity of the Entertainment Rail does not conform to this

assumption, but is a very small contributor to railroa d emissions. Annual estimates for the Entertainment

Rail contribution reflect activity and usage; however accurate daily estimates for Entertainment Rail

contribution would require additional efforts that are not required to support a periodic emissions inventory.

Daily summer and daily winter CO are essentially equal due to similar activity and emission factors for

locomotives.

# F - 68 

# 3.7 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 3



# 1. 1990 Base Year Ozone and CO Emissions Inventory SIP , The Bureau of Air Management,

Department of Environmental Protection, State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, November 1993



# 2. User's Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2 Mobile Source Emission Factor Model

, Document EPA420-R-03-010, US EPA, OTAQ, January 2002



# 3. Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation , Document

EPA420-R-04-013, US EPA, OAR/OTAQ, August, 2004



# 4. Procedures for Emission Inventory Pr eparation, Volume IV: MOBILE Sources , US EPA,

OAQPS, 1992



# 5. 1999 RFG Survey , Fuels & Energy Division, US EPA, April 1997



# 6. Airport Activity Statistics of Certificated Route Air Carriers CY 1995 , Federal Aviation

Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC



# 7. Part 1 Waterborne Commerce of the United States - 2005 , Document Number IWR-WCUS-05-

1, U.S. Department of Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia. For sale by: District

Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, Lousiana

70160 available on the web at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc/wcsc/pdf/wcusatl05.pdf



# 8. Energy Information Administration http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/main_ct.html or

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_pub lications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/foks_

historical.html (for multiple years) or for 2005 go to

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/da ta_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/h

istorical/2005/foks_2005.html



# 9. Procedures for Emission Inventory Pr eparation, Volume IV: MOBILE Sources , US EPA,

OAQPS, July 1989



# 10. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (AP-42) , Fifth Edition, with supplements A, B,

C, D, E, and F, US EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, May 1998



# 11. Fuels & Energy Division, US EPA: RFG Property and Performance Averages for Hartford, CT

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/properf/hart-ct.htm ; RFG Property and Performance

Averages for CT – remainder http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/properf/ct-remain.htm ;

and RFG Property and Performance Averages for NY-NJ-Long Is.-CT

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/properf/ny-nj-ct.htm (2005 Values presented on the page

as of January 3, 2008)



# 12. Technical Highlights Emission Factors for Locomotives , US EPA, OMS, December 1997,

Document Number EPA420-F-97-051



# 13. Conversion Factors for Hydrocarbon Emission Components , US EPA, OTAQ, May 2003,

Document Number EPA420-P-03-002



# 14. Diesel Fuel Sulfur Inputs for the Model used in the 2004 Nonroad diesel Engine Final Rule,

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2004/sulfur.txt



# 15. 2007 Connecticut Rail Transportation Ownership and Service, Connecticut Dept. of

Transportation Bureau of Public Transportation Office of Rail as of October 2006.



# 16. Federal Railroad Administration Geographic Link off http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/23

website obtaining http://fragis.frasafety.net/GISFRASafety/default.aspx then zoomed to

Connecticut

# ATTACHMENT F1

Sample Airport Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 69 

# July 19, 2006

«Contact», «Title»

«AirportName»

«ContactAddr1»

«ContactAddr2»

Dear «Contact»,

The Connecticut Department of Environmental Pr otection (DEP) Bureau of Air Management is

conducting a survey of airports ope rating in the state to determine the impact of fine particulate

(PM2.5), hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxide emissions on the air quality in

Connecticut. Aircraft operati ons are a small contributor to Connecticut ground level ozone

concentrations but Federal guidelines maintain th at states must include airport activity in our

emission inventories. The DEP requests your coop eration in providing the following information:



# ♦ Update airport contact information and provide seasonal and yearly Landing and

Takeoff (LTO) cycles for the calendar year 2005 (An aircraft la nding then taking off

would be one LTO) for the various type(s) of aircraft (i.e., Beech 18, Cessna 150)

using your runways.



# ♦ Hospitals and emergency service providers are requested to brea kout LTO counts into

two groups, those going to another airport or hospital and those going to an accident

scene. This will allow the DEP to account for the LTO at the accident scene while

avoiding any double counting that would have resulted at the other airport or hospital.

Unless otherwise identified in the survey response, all accident scene LTOs will be

assumed to be within the sa me county as the hospital.



# ♦ If aircraft specific LTO estimates are unavail able, a list of the predominant type(s) of

aircraft using your runways with an estimati on of percentages activity for each type of

aircraft can be used with estimated LTO totals.

The DEP is aware this data is usually not kept in detail, but rough estimat es are acceptable here.

The DEP would appreciate your response to the enclosed survey by September 14, 2006 . Your

response to this survey will help in prep aring the 2005 PM2.5, Ozone and Carbon Monoxide

Emissions Inventory.

Your immediate response to this survey is very important. If you would like an a lternative survey

format (i.e. hardcopy via mail or fax or an electr onic form) or if you have any questions, I can be

contacted at (860) 424-3385 or by E-mail at Steven .Potter@po.state.ct.us. Thank you in advance

for your time and cooperation.

Sincerely,

Steven Potter

Air Pollution Control Engineer II, Mobile Source Inventory

# ATTACHMENT F1

Sample Airport Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 70 

# Connecticut Airport Activity Survey

CT Department of Environmental Protection

79 Elm Street, 5th Floor 

# ♦ Hartford, CT 06106 

# ♦ 860-424-3385 

# ♦ 860-424-4063 (fax)

Please complete or correct the following information and return by September 14, 2006

Airport Name:

Location of Airport/Heliport:

Connecticut Aircraft specific data for 2005



# Aircraft (Make & Model) Annual LTOs

(12 month total) Jun., Jul., and

Aug. LTOs Jan., Feb., and

Dec. LTOs

Name (print): Title:

Telephone: Email:



# This information can be E-mailed to me at Steven .Potter@po.state.ct.us or faxed to 860-424-4063.

Optional Notes, Comments or Clarifications:

# Sample Locomotive Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 71 

# January 4, 2006

«Contact_Person», «Title»

«RailroadCo»

«Address»

«City», «State» «PostalCode»

Dear «Contact_Person»:

The Connecticut Department of Environmental Pr otection (DEP) Bureau of Air Management is

conducting a survey of companies operating locomotiv es in the state to determine the impact of

hydrocarbon emissions on the air quality in Connect icut. The DEP requests your cooperation in

providing the following information:



# ♦ Diesel fuel and/or coal use by Yard Locomotives in Connecticut in 2002.



# ♦ Diesel fuel and/or coal use by Line Haul Locomotives in Connecticut in 2002.



# Or if 

# Connecticut specific information is unavailable :



# ♦ Gross ton-miles traffic dens ity in Connecticut in 2002.



# ♦ Gross ton-miles traffic density system wide in 2002.



# ♦ Diesel fuel and/or coal use by Line Haul Locomotives system wide in 2002.

Please also include the following track mileage information:



# ♦ Miles of track used by diesel and/or coal Yard Locomotives.



# ♦ Miles of track used by diesel and/or coal Line Haul Locomotives

Please keep in mind this fuel-related question is for the entire year. The DEP would appreciate

your response to the enclos ed survey by March 31, 2006 . Your response to this survey will help in

preparing the 2002 Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Emissions Inventory.

Your immediate response to this survey is very important. If you have any questions, I can be

contacted at (860) 424-3385 or by E-mail at Stev en.Potter@po.state.ct.us. Thank you in advance

for your time and cooperation.

Sincerely,

Steven Potter

Air Pollution Control Engin eer, Mobile Source Inventory

# Sample Locomotive Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 72 

# CT Department of Environmental Protection

79 Elm Street, 5th Floor ♦ Hartford, CT 06106 ♦ 860-424-3385 ♦ 860-424-4063 fax

Please complete the fo llowing information and return by March 31, 2003

Railroad Co. Name ______________________________________________

Total track mileage of Line Haul locomotives for 2002 ________________

Total track mileage of Swit chyard locomotives for 2002 ________________

Location of Switchyard(s) _________________________________________



# Connecticut specific information for 2002

Diesel fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives____________________________________________

Coal fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives ____________________________________________

Diesel fuel use by Yard Locomotives ____________________________________________

Coal fuel use by Yard Locomotives _____________________________________________

If Connecticut specific information is not available, then complete information below.



# Connecticut and system wide information for 2002

Gross ton-miles traffic de nsity in CT _____________________________________________

Gross ton-miles traffic density systemwide ____________________________________

Diesel fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives systemwide _________________________________

Coal fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives system wide_________________________________

Name (Print) __________________________ Title _________________________

Telephone ___________________________ E-mail_________________________

This information can be E-mailed to me at Stev en.Potter@po.state.ct.us or faxed to 860-424-4063.

# F - 73 

# 4.5 SMALL STATIONARY SOURCE FUEL USE

Small stationary source fuel use is divided into three cat egories: residential, commercial/institutional,

and industrial. This source category includes small boi lers, furnaces, heaters, and other heating units too

small to be considered point sources. The area s ource fuel use for each fuel type is determined by

subtracting the annual point source fu el use from the annual state total fuel use. The emissions are

estimated by multiplying the quantity of fuel consumed by the appropriate emission factor. The

emission factors used in these calc ulations are from AP-42. The tota l fuel consumed for each category

and fuel type was calculated usi ng data obtained from the Energy In formation Administration, which

publishes the State Energy Data Reports. Data for 2005 consumption of residual and distillate oil were

available, however, 2005 data were not available for natural gas, liquid propane gas, and coal use.

Instead 2004 data were used for natural gas, liquid propane gas and coal consumption and assumed to be

representative of 2005 consumption.



# 4.5.1 Residential Fuel Use

For residential fuel use, the fuel was apportioned to the counties relative to the number of housing units

in a county. The number of housing units in each county we re obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau

and are listed on Table 4.5.1-1. Housing data were not available for 2005 since it was not a census year.

It was assumed that the number of housing units in 2000 is representative of housing in 2005.

According to the Energy Information Administratio n: 557,893 thousand gallons of distillate oil

(including kerosene) were used in 2005; and 44, 000 million cubic feet of natural gas, 72,408 thousand

gallons of liquid propane gas, and 0 tons of anthracite coal were used in 2004.

Coal is used for space heating. Emissions resulting fr om burning coal occur only in the winter. Oil,

natural gas, and liquid propane gas are used for space heating and the heating of water. Natural gas and

liquid propane gas may also be used for appliances such as, ovens and clothes dryers. Therefore,

emissions resulting from burning these fuels occur a ll year. Summertime emissions result from such

things as heating water, cooking and clothes drying. To estimate summertime fuel use the DEP relied

on the Energy Information Administration (EIA) da ta, which lists the amount of each fuel type

consumed by end use and census region 9 

# . The end uses were broken out into 4 different categories; all

uses, space heating, water heating, and appliances. There were 4 different census regions; Northeast,

Midwest, South and West. Consumption data fo r Northeast Region was used and assumed to be

representative of Connec ticut households’ relative fuel consumption between space heating, and water

heating and appliances. These data were found in Tables 1, 2 and 3 of their website at

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/b yfuels/2001/byfuels_2001.html. The mo st recent data available was

for 2001. According to the EIA data, 4,166 million gallons of oil were consumed for all residential uses

in the Northeast, of which 900 million gallons were us ed for water heating. Therefore it is estimated

that 22% of household oil used was for water heating. A similar calculation was done for liquid propane

gas and natural gas. It was determined that 49% and 28% of liquid propane gas and natural gas,

respectively were used for the heating of water and th e running of appliances. It was assumed that the

residential combustion of oil, natural gas and liquid propane gas takes place seven days a week

throughout the year. There are no residential sources in the Point Source Inventory.

# F - 74 

# Summertime emissions resulting from burning coal are set equal to zero. The emissions resulting from

burning oil, natural gas, and liqui d propane gas on a typical ozone su mmer day are calculated using the

following equation:

Where:

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expresse d in pounds per day

EF = emission factor fo r the pollutant and fuel type

Q = State total annual re sidential fuel used expressed in units compatible with the

emission factor

ADJ = 22%, 28% and 49% of oil, natural gas and liquid propane gas were used for

heating water and/or applianc es, respectively. No coal was used for heating water

and/or appliances

H = housing units for fuel type in a county(Table 4.5.1-1)

HT = State total housing units for fuel type (Table 4.5.1-1)

365 = 365 days per year, unit conversion factor

A sample CO calculation for oil use on a t ypical summer day in Hartford County is:

E = 361.93 lbs. CO per day

To determine the CO emissions resulting from burning a fuel other than wood on a typical winter day,

the typical daily CO emissions resulting from heati ng water (the same as typi cal ozone summer day CO

emissions as calculated above) are added to the typical winter daily CO emissions resulting from space

heating.

According to the Local C limatological Data of NOAA 16 

# , the heating degree-days (HDD) measured at

Bradley Airport in 2005 was 6,185. For the 90-day winter period (J anuary, February and December)

there were 3,387 -degree days at Bradley Airport in 2005 16 

# , or 54.76 percent of the yearly total.

Therefore, it is assumed that 54.76 percent of the fuel used for space heating is consumed in January,

February, and December. As stated above, all coal use is for space heating. Twenty-two percent, 28%

and 49% of oil, natural gas, and liquid propane ga s, respectively, were us ed for hot water and/or

appliances. Therefore, the remaining 78%, 72% and 51% of oil, natural gas, and liquid propane gas,

respectively were used for space heating. 

# HT x 365 H x ADJ x Q x EF = E

434,682365 905,14622.0 557,89305



# x x x x . = E

# F - 75 

# The CO emissions resulting from burning a fuel ot her than wood on a typical winter day are calculated

using the following equation:

Where:

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day

EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type 5



# Q = State total annual re sidential fuel used expressed in units compatible with the

emission factor 9



# ADJ = 22%, 28% and 49% of oil, natura l gas and liquid propane gas were used for

heating water and/or applianc es, respectively. No coal was used for heating water

and/or appliances

H = housing units for fuel type in a county (Table 4.5.1-1)

0. 5476 = 54.76% of fuel used for space h eating in January, February, and December

365 = 365 days per year, unit conversion factor

90 = 90 days in January, Februa ry, and December, un it conversion factor

HT = State total housing units fo r fuel type (sum from Table 4.5.1-1)

A sample CO calculation for oil use on a t ypical winter day in Hartford County is:

E = 3,211.72 lbs. CO per day 

# HT x 90 0.5 x H x ADJ)( x Q x EF

+ HT x 365 H x ADJ x Q x EF = E 476 1

−

434,682 476 905,1462 557,893

434,682 905,1462 557,893

x 90 0.5 x x )0.2(1 x x 5.0

+ x 365 x 0.2 x x 5.0 = E −

# F - 76 

# Table 4.5.1-1

Summary of Household Residential Fuel Use

No. of No. of Gas No. of Oil No. of LPG No. of Coal

County Household Household Household Household Household



# Fairfield 339,466 104,967 162,898 6,737 164

Hartford 353,022 135,763 146,905 7,522 384

Litchfield 79,267 8,892 46,349 1,902 136

Middlesex 67,285 6,074 40,271 1,942 56

New Haven 340,732 103,904 157,016 6,450 253

New London 110,674 10,411 65,677 3,335 231

Tolland 51,570 3,753 34,897 1,545 118

Windham 43,959 3,786 28,421 1,659 77

State Total 1,385,975 377,550 682,434 31,092 1,419F - 77Table 4.5.1-2Summary of Emissions from Residential Fuel Use of Natural GasGas Daily Daily Daily Winter AnnualAnnualAnnualNo. of(mil cu.COVOCNOxCOCOVOCNOxCountyHouseholdsft/year)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield104,96712,232.9375.3751.61882.112,518.97244.6633.64574.95Hartford135,76315,821.9485.5066.761,140.913,258.00316.4443.51743.63Litchfield8,8921,036.331.804.3774.73213.3920.732.8548.71Middlesex6,074707.921.722.9951.04145.7614.161.9533.27New Haven103,90412,109.1371.5751.09873.182,493.46242.1833.30569.13New London10,4111,213.337.235.1287.49249.8424.273.3457.03Tolland3,753437.413.421.8531.5490.068.751.2020.56Windham3,786441.213.541.8631.8290.868.821.2120.74State Total377,55044,000.01,350.14185.643,172.829,060.34880.00121.002,068.00F - 78Table 4.5.1-3Summary of Emissions from Residential Fuel Use of #2 Fuel Oil#2 Oil Daily Daily Daily Winter AnnualAnnualAnnualNo. of(1,000COVOCNOxCOCOVOCNOxCountyHouseholdsgal/year)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield162,898133,169.9401.3357.231,444.803,561.37332.9247.481,198.53Hartford146,905120,095.5361.9351.611,302.953,211.72300.2442.811,080.86Litchfield46,34937,890.5114.1916.28411.091,013.3194.7313.51341.01Middlesex40,27132,921.799.2214.15357.18880.4382.3011.74296.30New Haven157,016128,361.3386.8455.161,392.633,432.77320.9045.761,155.25New London65,67753,691.3161.8123.07582.511,435.87134.2319.14483.22Tolland34,89728,528.585.9812.26309.51762.9471.3210.17256.76Windham28,42123,234.370.029.99252.08621.3658.098.28209.11State Total682,434557,893.01,681.32239.766,052.7614,919.751,394.73198.895,021.04F - 79Table 4.5.1-4Summary of Emissions from Residential Fuel Use of Liquid Propane GasLPG Daily Daily Daily WinterAnnualAnnualAnnualNo. of(1,000COVOCNOxCOCOVOCNOxCountyHouseholdsgal/year)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield6,73715,689.340.0211.37294.87132.5214.904.24109.83Hartford7,52217,517.544.6812.70329.23147.9616.644.73122.62Litchfield1,9024,429.411.303.2183.2537.414.211.2031.01Middlesex1,9424,522.611.543.2885.0038.204.301.2231.66New Haven6,45015,021.038.3110.89282.31126.8714.274.06105.15New London3,3357,766.619.815.63145.9765.607.382.1054.37Tolland1,5453,598.09.182.6167.6230.393.420.9725.19Windham1,6593,863.59.852.8072.6132.633.671.0427.04State Total31,09272,408.0184.6952.491,360.87611.6068.7919.55506.86

# F - 80 

# 4.5.2 Commercial/Institutional Fuel Use

For commercial/institutional fuel use, statewide annua l fuel was apportioned to the counties relative to

the number of non-manufacturing employees in a c ounty. The number of non-manufacturing employees

by county in 2005 was obtained from the Connecticut Labor Depa rtment, Employment Security

Division 12 

# and is listed in Table 4.5.2-1. Similar to residential fuel use th e statewide annual fuel use data

for commercial/institutional operations were obtaine d from the Energy Information Administration.

According to the Energy Administration: 14,690 t housand gallons of residua l oil; and 120,939 thousand

gallons of distillate oil (including kerosene) were used in 2005; and 36,000 million cubic feet of natural

gas, 12,768 thousand gallons of liquid propane gas, and 4,000 tons of an thracite coal were consumed in

2004.

A computer search of the 2005 Po int Source Inventory was used to determine the total statewide

commercial/institutional fuel use that was accounted for in the Point Source Inventory. The fuel use by

commercial/institutional sources already accounted fo r in the Point Source Inventory was subtracted

from the total commercial/institutional fuel use to avoid being double count ed. The fuel used by

commercial/institutional sources from the Point Sour ce Inventory is as follows: residual oil, 1,544

thousand gallons; distillate oil, 5,199 thousand ga llons; natural gas, 4,630 million cubic feet; liquid

propane, 22 thousand gallons; a nd anthracite coal, zero.

In this category, coal would only be used for space hea ting, a wintertime activity. As in the residential

fuel use category, the emissions resu lting from burning oil, natural ga s, and liquid propane gas occur all

year. Data are not available to calculate the amount of annual fuel used for purposes other than space

heating as it was in the residential fuel use category. Therefore, the seasonal adjustment factors listed on

Table 5.8-1 in the EPA Procedures document were us ed. The seasonal adjustment factor for the summer

ozone season is 0.6 and the seasonal adjustment f actor for the winter CO season is 1.4. Activities

requiring the use of these fuels can take place seven days a week.

The annual fuel used in a county is calculated for each type of fu el using the following equation:

NMET NME x PT) (QT = Q

−

# F - 81 

# Where:

Q = annual county fuel use expressed in the same units as QT

QT = state total annua l commercial/institutional fuel used

PT = state annual co mmercial/institutional fu el use from Point Source

Inventory in same units as QT

NME = number of non-manufacturing employees in a county 12



# NMET = number of non- manufacturing employees in the state 12



# A sample calculation for distillate oil use in Hartford County is:

389,482,1 426,445 199,5939,120 x ) ( = Q

−

Q = 34,777.4 x 1,000 gallons

Summertime emissions resulting from burning coal were set equal to zero. Emissions resulting from

burning oil, natural gas, and liqui d propane gas on a typical ozone su mmer day and a typical CO winter

day are calculated using the following equation:

Where:

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day

EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type 5



# Q = annual county fuel used expressed in un its compatible with EF

ADJ = seasonal adjustment f actor which 0.6 for ozone season and 1.4 for CO season

365 = 365 days per year, unit conversion factor

A sample CO calculation for a typical ozone summer da y for distillate oil use in Hartford County is:



# 365 60.04.777,340.5 x x = E

E = 285.84 lbs. CO per day 365 ADJ x Q x EF = E

# F - 82 

# A sample CO calculation for a typical winter day for distillate oil use in Hartford County is:

E = 666.96 lbs. CO per day



# 4.5.3 Industrial Fuel Use

For industrial fuel use, statewide annual fuel was apportioned to the counties relative to the number of

manufacturing employees in a county. The number of manufacturing employees in 2005 by county were

obtained from the Connecticut Labor Depa rtment, Employment Security Division 12 

# and is listed on

Table 4.5.3-1. Similar to residential and commercial fuel use the statewide annual fuel use data were

obtained from the Energy Informati on Administration. According to the Energy Administration: 45,599

thousand gallons of residual oil; and 23,920 thousand gallo ns of distillate oil (i ncluding kerosene) were

used in 2005; and 21,000 million cubic feet of natu ral gas, 41,874 thousand gallons of liquid propane

gas, and 0 tons of anthracite coal consumed in 2004.

A computer search of the 2005 Po int Source Inventory was used to determine the total statewide

industrial fuel use that was accounted for in the Po int Source Inventory. The fuel use by industrial

sources already accounted for in the Point Source Inve ntory must be subtracted from the total industrial

fuel use. The total fuel use by i ndustrial sources from the Point Sour ce Inventory is as follows: residual

oil, 43,896 thousand gallons; distillate oil, 4,515 gallons; natural gas, 13,583 million cubic feet; liquid

propane gas, 269 thousand gallons; anthracite coal, 84 tons.

The industrial sector uses fuel primarily to provide process heat. Space heating requirements consume a

quantity of fuel that is not significant. Therefore, the fuel use by industrial s ources is uniform

throughout the year. Activities re quiring the use of these fuels can take place six days a week.

The annual fuel used in a county is calculated for each type of fu el using the following equation:

Where:

Q = annual county fuel use expressed in the same units as QT

QT = stat e total annual industrial fuel used

PT = state annual industrial fuel use from Point Source inventory in same units as QT

ME = number of manufacturing employees in a county from Table 4.5.3-1

MET = number of manufacturing em ployees in the state su m from Table 4.5.3-1

A sample calculation for distillate oil use in Fairfield County is: 365 4.14.777,340.5 x x = E

M E T ME x PT) (QT = Q

−

# F - 83 

# Q = 4,251.9 x 1,000 gallons

The emissions resulting from fuel use by industrial sources on a typica l ozone summer day and a typical

CO winter day are calculated using the following equation:

Where:

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day

EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type 5



# Q = annual county fuel used expr essed in units compatible with EF

6 = 6 activity days per week, unit conversion factor

52 = 52 weeks per year, unit conversion factor

A sample CO calculation for distillate oil use in Fairfield County is:

E = 68.14 lbs. CO per day 316,197 235,43 515,4920,23 x ) ( = Q

−

52 x 6 Q x EF = E

526 9.251,40.5

x x = EF - 84Table4.5.2-1Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Natural GasNon-Mfg.EmployeesArea GasDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxWinter COAnnual COAnnual VOC Annual NOxCountyby County(mil ft3/yr)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield391,2118,278.7285.7977.571,360.88666.8386.9323.59413.94Hartford445,4269,426.0325.3988.321,549.48759.2498.9726.86471.30Litchfield53,7921,138.339.3010.67187.1291.6911.953.2456.92Middlesex60,8731,288.244.4712.07211.76103.7613.533.6764.41New Haven345,8787,319.4252.6768.581,203.19589.5676.8520.86365.97New London116,0112,455.084.7523.00403.56197.7425.787.00122.75Tolland37,163786.427.157.37129.2863.358.262.2439.32Windham32,035677.923.406.35111.4454.607.121.9333.90State Total1,482,38931,370.01,082.91293.935,156.702,526.78329.3989.401,568.50F - 85Table4.5.2-2Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Residual (#6) OilNon-Mfg.EmployeesArea #6 OilDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxWinter COAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(1000 gal)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield391,2113,469.328.516.44313.6666.538.671.9695.41Hartford445,4263,950.132.477.34357.1375.759.882.23108.63Litchfield53,792477.03.920.8943.139.151.190.2713.12Middlesex60,873539.84.441.0048.8110.351.350.3114.85New Haven345,8783,067.325.215.70277.3258.827.671.7384.35New London116,0111,028.88.461.9193.0119.732.570.5828.29Tolland37,163329.62.710.6129.806.320.820.199.06Windham32,035284.12.330.5325.685.450.710.167.81State Total1,482,38913,146.0108.0524.421,188.54252.1132.877.43361.52F - 86Table 4.5.2-3Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Liquid Propane GasNon-Mfg.EmployeesArea LPGDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxWinter COAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(1000 gal)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield391,2113,363.710.512.9977.4124.513.200.9123.55Hartford445,4263,829.911.963.4088.1427.913.641.0326.81Litchfield53,792462.51.440.4110.643.370.440.123.24Middlesex60,873523.41.630.4612.053.810.500.143.66New Haven345,8782,974.09.292.6468.4421.672.830.8020.82New London116,011997.53.120.8922.967.270.950.276.98Tolland37,163319.51.000.287.352.330.300.092.24Windham32,035275.40.860.246.342.010.260.071.93State Total1,482,38912,746.039.8111.31293.3392.8912.113.4489.22F - 87Table 4.5.2-4Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using CoalNon- Mfg.EmployeesArea CoalWinter DayAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(tons)CO (lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield391,2111,055.6364.4247.505.281.58Hartford445,4261,201.9414.9354.096.011.80Litchfield53,792145.150.116.530.730.22Middlesex60,873164.356.707.390.820.25New Haven345,878933.3322.2042.004.671.40New London116,011313.0108.0714.091.570.47Tolland37,163100.334.624.510.500.15Windham32,03586.429.843.890.430.13State Total1,482,3894,000.01,380.89180.0020.006.00F - 88Table 4.5.2-5Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Distillate (#2) OilNon-Mfg.EmployeesArea #2 OilDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxWinter COAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(1000 gal)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield391,21130,544.5251.0525.611,004.20585.7876.367.79305.44Hartford445,42634,777.4285.8429.161,143.36666.9686.948.87347.77Litchfield53,7924,199.934.523.52138.0880.5510.501.0742.00Middlesex60,8734,752.839.063.98156.2591.1511.881.2147.53New Haven345,87827,005.0221.9622.64887.83517.9067.516.89270.05New London116,0119,057.874.457.59297.79173.7122.642.3190.58Tolland37,1632,901.623.852.4395.3955.657.250.7429.02Windham32,0352,501.220.562.1082.2347.976.250.6425.01State Total1,482,389115,740.0951.2997.033,805.142,219.67289.3529.511,157.40F - 89Table 4.5.3-1Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using #2 OilArea Ind.Mfg. Employees#2 OilDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(1000 gal)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield43,2354,251.968.142.73272.5610.630.4342.52Hartford59,8835,889.294.383.78377.5114.720.5958.89Litchfield11,4371,124.818.030.7272.102.810.1111.25Middlesex10,8141,063.517.040.6868.172.660.1110.64New Haven43,6334,291.168.772.75275.0710.730.4342.91New London17,6911,739.827.881.12111.534.350.1717.40Tolland3,518346.05.540.2222.180.860.033.46Windham7,105698.711.200.4544.791.750.076.99State Total197,31619,405.0310.9812.441,243.9148.511.94194.05F - 90Table 4.5.3-2Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using Liquid Propane GasArea Ind.Mfg. EmployeesLPGDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(1000 gal)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield43,2359,116.393.5015.78555.1614.592.4686.60Hartford59,88312,626.6129.5021.85768.9320.203.41119.95Litchfield11,4372,411.524.734.17146.863.860.6522.91Middlesex10,8142,280.223.393.95138.863.650.6221.66New Haven43,6339,200.294.3615.92560.2714.722.4887.40New London17,6913,730.238.266.46227.165.971.0135.44Tolland3,518741.87.611.2845.171.190.207.05Windham7,1051,498.115.372.5991.232.400.4014.23State Total197,31641,605.0426.7272.012,533.6466.5711.23395.25F - 91Table 4.5.3-3Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using Natural GasMfg. EmployeesArea Ind. GasDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby County(mil ft3/yr)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield43,2351,625.2109.3929.69520.8917.064.6381.26Hartford59,8832,251.0151.5141.12721.4623.646.42112.55Litchfield11,437429.928.947.85137.794.511.2321.50Middlesex10,814406.527.367.43130.294.271.1620.32New Haven43,6331,640.1110.3929.96525.6917.224.6782.01New London17,691665.044.7612.15213.146.981.9033.25Tolland3,518132.28.902.4242.381.390.386.61Windham7,105267.117.984.8885.602.800.7613.35State Total197,3167,417.0499.22135.502,377.2477.8821.14370.85F - 92Table 4.5.3-4Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using Residual OilArea Ind.Mfg. Employees#2 OilDaily CODaily VOCDaily NOxAnnual COAnnual VOCAnnual NOxCountyby Zone(10^3 gal)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(lbs/day)(tons/year)(tons/year)(tons/year)Fairfield43,235373.25.980.4865.780.930.0710.26Hartford59,883516.88.280.6691.111.290.1014.21Litchfield11,43798.71.580.1317.400.250.022.71Middlesex10,81493.31.500.1216.450.230.022.57New Haven43,633376.66.040.4866.390.940.0810.36New London17,691152.72.450.2026.920.380.034.20Tolland3,51830.40.490.045.350.080.010.83Windham7,10561.30.980.0810.810.150.011.69State Total197,3161,703.027.292.18300.214.260.3446.83

# F - 9 3 

# 4.7 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 4

1. Connecticut Population and Housing Characteristics, 1990 Census Complete Count Data and

1999 population data, Connecticut State Data Center, Office of Policy and Management, From

OPM’s website, October 2000.

2. State of Connecticut Department of Revenue Services, Excise Tax Subdivision, 92 Farmington

Ave., Hartford, CT 06105.

3. Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, Ab atement of Air Pollution. Section 221-174 of the

Connecticut General Statutes.

4.. Petroleum Product Vendor Registration Progr am FY90, Office of Policy and Management,

Energy Division, State of Connecticut, 1992.

5. Compilation of Air Pollu tion Emission Factors (AP-42) , Fifth Edition, with supplements A, B, C,

D, E, and F, US EPA, OAQPS, Re search Triangle Park, NC, May 1998.

6. User's Guide to MOBILE 6.1 and 6. 2 Mobile Source Emission Factor Model , Document

EPA420-R-03-010, US EPA, OMS, August 2003.

7. 1990 Base Year Ozone And Ca rbon Monoxide Emissions Inventory , Department of

Environmental Protection, State of C onnecticut, Hartford, CT. November 1993.

8. Department of Transportation, St ate of Connecticut, Wethersfield, CT.

9. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey: Household Energy Consumption and

Expenditures Tables , Energy Information Administration, EI 30, 1000 Independence Avenue,

SW, Washington, DC 20585

10. Procedures for the Preparation of Emission Inventories for Carbon M onoxide and Precursors of

Ozone , Vol. 1, US EPA, OAQPS, May 1991.

11. Fax from Bill Cronin, Federal Aviation Admini stration, New England Re gion, Boston, MA, June

1998.

12. Connecticut Labor Department, Employment Security Division, Office of Research and

Information, State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, 96.

13. Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operati on, Department of Transportation, State of

Connecticut, August 1997.

# F - 9 4 

# 14. Acres of Farmland by Town in 1996, Fred Schm ura, Office of Policy and Management, State of

Connecticut, May 1998.

15. Surface Impoundment Modeling System (SIMS) Version 2.0 User's Manual , OAQPS, US EPA,

Research Triangle Park, NC, Sept. 1990.

16. Local Climatological Data Monthly Summary , Bradley Field, Hartford & LaGuardia Airport,

New York, US Department of Commerce, NOAA, 1996.

17. Pesticides Industry Sales And Us age: 1992 and 1993 Market Estimates, Document

733-K-94-001, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 1994.

18. Connecticut Housing Production and Permit Authorized Construction, 1990 , Connecticut

Department of Housing, 1990.

19. Summary of Social, Economic , and Housing Characteristics , Bureau of Census, U.S. Department

of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1991.

20. Residential Use of Wood fuel in Connecticut , RPM Systems Inc., New Haven, CT, Oct 1991.

21. The Climate of Connecticut , State Geological and Natural History Survey, Joseph J. Brumbach,

Bulletin #99, 1968.

22. Bakery Production and Marketing Magazine , June.

23. Solid Waste Management Plan State of Connecticut , Connecticut Department of Environmental

Protection, 1983.

24. Study of Stage I Rule Effectiveness in Connecticut , Connecticut Department of Environmental

Protection, Debra Tedford, 1995.

25. Telephone Conversation with De nnis Greci, Connecticut Depa rtment of Environmental

Protection, Bureau of Water Prot ection and Land Reuse, July, 1997.

26. Description of Establishment of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Inventory , Connecticut

Department of Environmental Prot ection, Scott Koschwitz, June 1998.

27. Telephone Conversation with Pat Mitchell, Hu dson Company, Providence, RI June 1998.

28. EIIP Area Sources Preferre d and Alternative Methods , US EPA OAQPS, July 1997.

29. Email from Bradford Robinson To Chris Mulca hy, Connecticut Department of Environmental

Protection, Bureau of Materials Management and Compliance Assurance, October 4, 2000

# F - 9 5 

# 30. Report MA28F-Paint and Allied Products , U.S. Census Bureau, De partment of Commerce,

Washington D.C.

31. Highway Statistics for 2001, Federal Highway Administra tion, U.S. Department of

Transportation, Washington, D.C.

32. Data Needs and Availability for Wild Land Fire Emission Inventories- Short-term Improvements

to the Wild Land Fire Component of the National Emission Inventory , EC/R Incorporated,

Chapel Hill, NC

33. MARAMA Control Analysis and Documentatio n for Residential W ood Combustion in the

MANE-VU Region , prepared by James E. Houck and Brian N. Eagle, OMNI Environmental

Services, Inc., 5465 SW Western Ave nue, Suite G, Beaverton, Oregon 97005

34. MANE-VU Residential Wood Burning Combustion Emission Inventory , prepared by E.H.

Pechan & Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 1345, 6245 Pleasant Valley Road, El Dorado, CA 95623

35. Solvent Mass Balance Approach For Estimating VOC Emissions From Eleven Nonpoint Solvent

Source Categories , EC/R Incorporated, Chapel Hill, NC.

36. Control Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules,

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 5528-B Hempstead Way, Springfield, VA 22151.

37. Notice of Public Meeting to Cons ider the Approval of California ’s Portable Gasoline-Container

Emissions Inventory, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, September 1999 (MSC

99-25).

38. Portable Fuel Containers, Area Source Calcul ation Methodology Sheets for the 2002 Periodic

Emission Inventory , New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, NJ.

39. Email from Dana Placzek To Chris Mulcahy, Connecticut Department of Labor, Office of

Research, January 16, 2007.

40. Estimating Emissions Associated with Portable Fuel Containers (PFCs) , United States

Environmental Protection Agency, February 2007.

41. Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupi ed Housing Units: 2005 American Community

Survey , United States Census Bureau Website.

42. 2002 National Emission Inventory Version 3 , United States Environm ental Protection Agency,

September 2007.