alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

Dated: December 5, 2008 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: December 5, 2008 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

         We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation   by  reference  into  the
Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (No.  333-50404 and No. 333-136832) of Vyta
Corp and subsidiaries (formerly known as NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.) of our
report  dated  October 14,  2008 (which  expresses  an  unqualified  opinion and
includes an explanatory  paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue
as a going  concern),  which  appears on page F-1 of this Annual  Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2008.


/s/GHP HORWATH, P.C.


Denver, Colorado
October 14, 2008
From: "Gordon, Norma" Norma.Gordon@lfr.com

Sent: 08/13/2008 04:13 PM

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Norm Davis" ndavis@morinbrick.com

Subject: EPA Information Collection Request for Brick and Structural Clay Products

Mr. Telander:

On behalf of Morin Brick Company (MBC), LFR is submitting the completed EPA information collection 

request (ICR) for their Auburn, Maine facility, in accordance with the June 9, 2008 letter from Mr. Peter 

Tsirigotis of EPA to Mr. Norman Davis of MBC. Attached is the ICR file (Excel workbook) as well as the 

requested attachments. The attachments include the cost estimate for the dry limestone adsorber 

(DLA) and a process flow diagram, as well as raw material test results for hydrogen fluorides and 

chlorides.

It is important to note that MBC's Auburn facility is not subject to the MACT. The DLA was installed 

because of State of Maine Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements.

Per our telephone conversation on July 13th, we have not completed the survey for MBC's former 

Gorham, Maine facility. As we discussed, the Gorham facility has been shut down since February 2005 

and MBC has no intention of re-starting operations at that site. In fact, the property is currently in the 

process of being sold, and the brick plant is expected to be demolished by the buyer.

MBC has made every effort to provide all available information as requested in the survey. The 

economic information on Form F is considered confidential business information. A hard copy of that 

data is being submitted separately.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

Sincerely,

Norma Gordon

Norma J. Gordon

Senior Associate

LFR

One Union Street, Suite 5

Portland, ME 04101

(207)774-3644 Direct Dial

(207)272-6825 Mobile

(207)774-3686 Facsimile

norma.gordon@lfr.com

Visit us at www.lfr.com

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the named addressee(s) and 

may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under 

applicable law.
If you are not a named addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or 

copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 

the original sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete this message, along with 

any attachments, from your computer. Thank you.

(See attached file: Morin Brick ICR 6-4-08.xls)(See attached file: Morin Brick - Plant Layout.pdf)

(See attached file: Morin Brick - DLA Cost Estimate.pdf)

(See attached file: Morin Brick - Chlorides Analysis.pdf)

(See attached file: Morin Brick - HF Analysis.pdf)
#### Ex parte Charles Shean.

Under the act of March 25,1875 (72 Ohio L. 105), entitled “an act to facilitate the administration of justice in Cuyahoga county,” a term of the Court of Common Pleas may he held in and for said county, commencing on the first Monday of September, 1875.

Motion for allowance of a writ of *habeas corpus.*

*Heisley $ Meisley,*for Shean.

By the Court.

As a general rule, this court will refer parties desiring the aid of this writ to the inferior courts of the state, or to the judges authorized to allow the same; and will take cognizance of such case only when special circumstances render it necessary to settle some important question. This case comes within the exception, as it involves the determination of the question whether, under existing legislation, the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county is authorized to hold a term commencing on the first Monday of September' next, concerning which grave doubts are said to have arisen in the minds of the judges and bar of that county.

The case made by Shean, in his application for the writ, shows that he is imprisoned in the jail of Cuyahoga county on a charge of robbery, and that he was committed to await trial upon default of giving bail in the sum of $2,000 for his appearance at the November term of said court, as required by the judge of the police court of the city of Cleveland, before whom he was examined.

*441The examination was had on the 7th day of June, 1875, and section 43 of the criminal code required the recognizance to bo taken for his appearance to answer the charge before the Court of Common Pleas on the first day of the term next thereafter to be holden.

The terms of the court for the year 1875 had been fixed by the judges, in pursuance of the act of April 16, 1867 (S. & S. 600), as follows, to wit: Commencing on 8th of February, 3d of May, and 1st of November. But subsequently, on the 25th day of March, 1875, the general assembly passed an act to take effect on the 1st of July, 1875, entitled “an act to facilitate the administration of justice in Cuyahoga county” (72 Ohio L. 105), the 4th section of which provides that “ the said Court of Common Pleas shall hold five terms in each year, which shall commence on the first Monday of January, March, May, September, and November.”

After a careful examination of all the provisions of this last-named act, we are of opinion that the provisions of the 4th section supersede the order of the judges theretofore made as to the terms of the court to be holden after the taking effect of the statute, and that terms of the Court of Common Pleas in said county may be legally held, under the statute, commencing on the first Monday of September and of November in the present year.

In view of the importance of this question, we have concluded to entertain the motion and allow the writ, to the end that the applicant may be admitted to bail for his appearance before the Court of Common Pleas on the first day of the September term, to answer said charge.

*Writ allowed.*
```

[House Report 107-86]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-86

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1699, COAST GUARD AUTHORIZATION ACT 
                                OF 2001

                                _______
                                

June 5, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 155]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 155, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1699, the 
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2001, under a modified open 
rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
    The rule provides that the bill be open for amendment at 
any point. The rule makes in order only those amendments 
printed in the Congressional Record and pro forma amendments 
for the purpose of debate. The rule further provides that each 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record may be offered 
only by the Member who caused it to be printed or his designee, 
and that each amendment shall be considered as read. The rule 
also provides one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Finally, section 2 of the rule provides that House 
Resolutions 130, 147, 149, and 150 are laid on the table.

                                  

```
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting Officer of
Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 1992 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer of Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. hereby certify that to my
knowledge, Consolidated Medical Management's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended September 30, 2005 complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements
contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of the operations of Consolidated Medical Management, Inc.



     Date: November 11,  2005               /s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.,
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Consolidated Medical Management
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          31,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  533,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    180,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 940,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        750,781
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           41,908
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   940,119
<SALES>                                         87,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,577
<CGS>                                           62,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,613
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,485)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,425
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.46
        

</TABLE>
December 11, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) 

Attendees: 

Eric Schaeffer, Environmental Integrity Project 

Whitney Ferrell, Environmental Integrity Project 

William Maxwell, EPA 

Paul Versace, EPA 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held regarding clarifying questions from Environmental Integrity Project on 

the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) reconsideration issues.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 21, 1995 (47), Para 47.19 Leave of Absence]
[Page 419]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.47.19  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to Mr. WALKER, for 
today.
  And then,
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1490

To expedite the naturalization of aliens who served with special guerrilla

units in Laos.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 7, 1995

Mr. VENTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To expedite the naturalization of aliens who served with

special guerrilla units in Laos.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hmong Veterans’ Nat5 uralization Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE REQUIREMENT

7 FOR CERTAIN ALIENS WHO SERVED WITH

8 SPECIAL GUERRILLA UNITS IN LAOS.

9 The requirement of paragraph (1) of section 312(a)

10 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
2

•HR 1490 IH

1 1423(a)) shall not apply to the naturalization of any per2 son who—

3 (1) served with a special guerrilla unit operat4 ing from a base in Laos in support of the United

5 States at any time during the period beginning Feb6 ruary 28, 1961, and ending September 18, 1978, or

7 (2) is the spouse or widow of a person described

8 in paragraph (1).

9 SEC. 3. NATURALIZATION THROUGH SERVICE IN A SPECIAL

10 GUERRILLA UNIT IN LAOS.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of subsection

12 (a) and subsection (b) (other than paragraph (3)) of sec13 tion 329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

14 1440) shall apply to an alien who served with a special

15 guerrilla unit operating from a base in Laos in support

16 of the United States at any time during the period begin17 ning February 28, 1961, and ending September 18, 1978,

18 in the same manner as they apply to an alien who has

19 served honorably in an active-duty status in the military

20 forces of the United States during the period of the Viet21 nam hostilities.

22 (b) PROOF.—The Immigration and Naturalization

23 Service shall verify an alien’s service with a guerrilla unit

24 described in subsection (a) through—
3

•HR 1490 IH

1 (1) review of refugee processing documentation

2 for the alien,

3 (2) the affidavit of the alien’s superior officer,

4 (3) original documents,

5 (4) two affidavits from persons who were also

6 serving with such a special guerrilla unit and who

7 personally knew of the alien’s service, or

8 (5) other appropriate proof.

9 The Service shall liberally construe the provisions of this

10 subsection to take into account the difficulties inherent in

11 proving service in such a guerrilla unit.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER M. JONES

Petitioner, Civil No. 4:15-cv-12239

 Hon. Terrence G. Berg

v. 

THOMAS WINN, 

Respondent.

 /

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [dkt. # 15],

DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, [dkt. # 16]

AND DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA

PAUPERIS [dkt. # 17]

This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed a pro se

petition for writ of habeas corpus. On October 31, 2016, the Court issued an Opinion

and Order denying the petition. The Opinion also specifically denied Petitioner a

certificate of appealability and permission to appeal in forma pauperis. Before the

Court are Petitioner’s application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and his

application for a certificate of appealability.

Local Rule 7.1(h) allows a party to file a motion for reconsideration. 

However, a motion for reconsideration which presents the same issues already

ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be

granted. Ford Motor Co. v. Greatdomains.com, Inc., 177 F. Supp. 2d 628, 632 (E.D.

Mich. 2001). The movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the

1

4:15-cv-12239-TGB-APP Doc # 19 Filed 01/04/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 987
court and the parties have been misled but also show that a different disposition of

the case must result from a correction thereof. A palpable defect is a defect that is

obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Witzke v. Hiller, 972 F. Supp. 426,

427 (E.D. Mich. 1997).

There is no palpable defect in the Court’s prior order. As the Court already

explained, to warrant a grant of a certificate of appealability, “[t]he petitioner must

demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the

constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).

Petitioner’s habeas claims do not meet this standard for the reasons explained in

the prior opinion. Furthermore, as previously explained, any appeal could not be

taken in good faith, so leave to appeal in forma pauperis is again denied. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). 

Petitioner’s pending motions are therefore DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Terrence G. Berg

TERRENCE G. BERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 4, 2017

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on January 4,

2017, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each party.

s/A. Chubb

Case Manager

2

4:15-cv-12239-TGB-APP Doc # 19 Filed 01/04/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 988
---





---



Today, the Board is considering an interagency proposal to revise the regulatory capital framework for large, complex U.S. banking organizations. The Federal Reserve has responsibilities both for the safety and soundness of our banking system and for overall financial stability and economic growth.  In this regard, experience has clearly demonstrated that both strong capital and strong risk management are important for maintaining bank safety and soundness and promoting financial stability. Given the increasing complexity of the activities at our largest banks, and the related risks of those activities, I fully support efforts to develop a more appropriately risk-sensitive capital framework for those institutions.  The current Basel I framework has become increasingly inadequate for capturing the risks at large, complex U.S. banking organizations.  Accordingly, I welcome this opportunity to consider the draft interagency proposal implementing the Basel II framework. At the same time, I recognize that the U.S. implementation of the Basel II framework raises a number of important issues.  We must be confident that the capital requirements determined in this framework will enhance safety and soundness of the banking system, and we need to ensure that the framework does not artificially distort the competitive playing field.  To help us achieve both of these objectives, the Federal Reserve welcomes any and all comments on the draft being released today. Governor Bies, I now turn to you, as oversight Governor for this initiative, for your introductory thoughts.


Basel II Capital Accord Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) and Supporting Board Documents  Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us  Last update: March 30, 2006
Order entered January 7, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01449
- CV
DOUGLAS HUNDERMAN AN D DOROTHY HUNDERMAN, Appellant s V. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, ET AL, Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 09043



### O RDER As directed to do so, appellants have filed written verification they have requested the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER de puty reporter Melissa Maxwell, whom the record
reflects re c or d ed the hearing that has been requested, to file the record no later than February 6,
2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Thu Bui, Offic i al Court Reporter for t he 101 st Judicial District Court; Ms. Maxwell; and, the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: September 7, 2006  /s/ Francis L. Simola Francis L. Simola Chairman, President and CEO
#### § 502.707 Intervention.

Intervention will ordinarily not be permitted. [Rule 707.]