alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 29, 2007

|Filer                                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|CORTLAND SAVINGS AND BANKING COMPANY, THE | * Branch       | Cortland Savings and Banking Company, Corland, OH to establish a branch at 15561 West High Street, Middlefield, OH.                                                                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                | Not available 
|Federal Register:                         | Not applicable
|FC BANC CORP                              | CIC            | Notice of Change in Bank Control,Robert Duane Hord (and Hord control group) to acquire in excess of 10 percent of the outstanding shares of FC Banc Corp., Bucyrus, Ohio                                  | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                                | Not available 
|Federal Register:                         | Not available 
|MILTON BANCORP, INC.                      | * 3A5          | Milton Bancorp, Inc., Wellston, Ohio, to acquire 100 percent of Community First Financial Bancorp, Inc., New Holland, Ohio, and thereby acquire The First National Bank of New Holland, New Holland, Ohio | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/04/2008    
|Newspaper:                                | Not available 
|Federal Register:                         | 01/04/2008    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Taylor, Appellant, v. Derry, Appellee.

1. Peactice — Notice op Motion.

Written notice of motions is required in all cases except those made during the progress of a trial.

2. Same.

Notice of a motion for extension of time within which to tender a bill of exceptions is jurisdictional, and an *ex parte*order extending time in such a case is void.

3. Same — Bill op Exceptions.

A .bill of exceptions which was not tendered until after the expiration of the time originally allowed for that purpose is no part of the record, notwithstanding it was tendered within the time allowed by a subsequent order obtained without notice.

4. Appellate Peactice.

A jurisdictional question may he raised for the first time in the appellate court.

*Appeal from the County Court of Arapahoe County.*

Messrs. Coe & Carpenter, for appellant.

Mr. William R. Barbour and Mr. William M. Maguire, for appellee.

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On the 18th day of May, 1892, William Derry, plaintiff *110below, recovered judgment against the defendant,-Charles E. Taylor, for $105. On the same day defendant prayed an appeal to this court, which was allowed, and sixty days given him within which to prepare and tender his bill of exceptions. On the 8th day of July, 1892, upon defendant’s motion, the court made an order extending this time thirty additional days. It appears from the record that no notice of the motion was given to the plaintiff or his attorney, and that the order was made *exfarte.*Section 372 of the Civil Code provides that written notice of motions shall be required in all cases, except those made during the progress of a trial. The sections following fix the time of notice before the hearing, and prescribe the manner of its service.

These code requirements are jurisdictional. Except upon proper notice, the court was without power to make the order; and, having been made *ex*parte, it is void. *Mallan v. Higenbotham,*10 Colo. 264; *Troth v. Crow,*1 Colo. App. 453.

The bill of exceptions was not tendered until the 8th day of August, 1892, long after the expiration of the time originally allowed for that purpose. The order, being void, did not operate to extend the time ; and the bill of exceptions is, therefore, improperly in the record. A motion in the court below to vacate the order was unnecessary. A jurisdictional question may be raised for the first time in the appellate court.

The case was commenced before a justice of the peace. There are no written pleadings to apprise us of the nature of the plaintiff’s demand. The bill of exceptions cannot be considered ; and as, therefore, none of the evidence in the case is before us,.we are bound by the presumption that the judgment is correct, and it is accordingly affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
DOVER SADDLERY, INC. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Stephen L. Day                              |  |  |  | /s/ David R. Pearce          
|                                                |  | 
|Stephen L. Day                                  |  |  |  | David R. Pearce              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                |  | 
|Date: June 5, 2013                              |  |  |  | Date: June 5, 2013
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 22, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2009 (October 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Argued and submitted October 6,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration November 8, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Rito N. Nunez, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION/ SENECA SAWMILL COMPANY, *Petitioner, v.*Rito N. NUNEZ and Liberty Northwest Insurance Company/ Seneca Sawmill Company, *Respondents.*

(91-10770, 91-17477, 91-16978, 91-17476; CA A78443)

904 P2d 657

Alexander Libman argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Liberty Northwest Insurance Company and Seneca Sawmill Company.

G. Duff Bloom waived appearance for respondent Rito N. Nunez.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Or Laws 1995, ch 332, § 37; *SAIF v. Drews,*318 Or 1, 860 P2d 254 (1993).
#### Alfred Curry, *Respondent, v.*John W. Adams, Appellant.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.34 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1158]
[Page 381]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.34  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1158

  Mr. DREIER, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-78) the resolution (H. Res. 115) providing for the consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
additional disaster assistance and making rescissions for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
```
#### § 59.10-30 Seal welding.

Where leaks occur in riveted joints or connections, they must be carefully investigated to determine the cause. Such leaks may be made tight by seal welding the edge, if accepted by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
#### Cheek, Respondent, *v.*Industrial Powder Coatings, Inc. et al., Petitioners.

[Cite as *Cheek v. Indus. Powder Coatings, Inc.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 534.]

(No. 97-1962

Submitted February 10, 1999

Decided March 10, 1999.)

*Reese M. Wineman,*for respondent.

*Ziegler, Metzger & Miller L.L.P., Stephen M. Bales*and *John E. Redeker,*for petitioners.

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII, the United States District Court certified the question of “Whether an individual employee, not otherwise deemed to be an ‘employer’ under the statute, may be individually liable for alleged violations of the employment discrimination provisions of the Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Rev.Code §§ 4112.01(A)(2), 4112.02(A) & 4112.99?”

Our response is in the affirmative. See *Genaro v. Gent. Transport, Inc.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I disagree with the majority for the reasons set out in the dissenting opinions in *Genaro v. Cent. Transport, Inc.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782. I would hold that the General Assembly intended R.C. Chapter 4112 to impose liability only on employers, not on an employer’s managers or supervisors. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 24, 2007

----

EnforcementCache Valley Banking Company, Logan, Utah, and Cache Valley Bank  -- issuance of a cease and desist order, and termination of the written agreement issued April 19, 2004, with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Utah State Department of Financial Institutions. 					-Announced, March 23, 2007 					North Valley Bank, Zanesville, Ohio  -- written agreement with the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions and the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.					-Announced, March 22, 2007 					

FormsInformation Collection  -- final Board review to revise without extension the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C), Financial Statements of U.S. Nonbank Subsidiaries of U.S. Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-11), and Financial Statements of Foreign Subsidiaries of U.S. Banking Organizations (FR 2314).					-Approved, March 19, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsMortgage Markets  -- statement by Roger T. Cole, Director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.					-Published, March 22, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 29, 2007
Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 09:24 PM

From: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/31/2010 05:23 PM

Subject: Question on the 1000 foot requirement for open clinker piles.

Dear Courtney:

This is in response to your question on open clinker piles in your comments.

(See attached file: In the SCAQMD regulation.docx)

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov

### In the SCAQMD regulation, there are different requirements

for active vs. inactive open clinker piles. An inactive pile is

one that had not been disturbed for 30 consecutive days. In

addition, the ACAQMD rule has different requirements for clinker

piles that are 1,000 feet or less form the facility propertyline. This 1000 foot criterion was a mutually agreed number

among the stakeholders (both industry and environmental groups)

involved in developing the regulation. 1 

### Given the lack of

additional data, we saw no reason to change this criterion.

More information on this rule is available at

http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/gb_cal95.html

.

1 

### Telecon with Tuyet-Le Pham, South Coast Air Quality Management

District. June 29, 2010.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2022

TYRONE SIMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge.

(CA-01-317-5-22BD)

Submitted: March 18, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Gist, THE GIST LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellant. Eric C. Schweitzer, Catherine B. Templeton, OGLETREE,

DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Sims appeals the district court’s order awarding

summary judgment to his former employer on his racial

discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Sims v. Albemarle

Corp., No. CA-01-317-5-22BD (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                    COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

                                MGI PHARMA, INC.

                                  (unaudited)



The following information is required in computations of basic and diluted loss
per common share for each period:



                           Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                                 June 30,                    June 30,
                        --------------------------  --------------------------
                            1998          1997          1998          1997
                        ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------


Loss:
 Net loss                $   (70,875) $  (822,780)  $  (167,922)  $(1,358,583)


Common shares:
 Adjusted weighted
   shares
     outstanding (a)      14,325,735   14,099,459    14,268,708    14,094,447



Loss per common share:
 Net loss                $     (0.00)  $    (0.06)  $     (0.01)  $     (0.10)

(a) Basic and diluted loss per share amounts are identical as the effect of
potential common shares is antidilutive.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m., Friday, June 8, 2007.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-2529 Filed 5-17-07; 11:21 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
98-1166.

#### State v. Robb.

Franklin App. Nos. 95APA08-1003 and 95APA08-1008. On motion for appointment of counsel. Motion referred to the court of appeals for appointment of counsel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR NOONEY  REAL  PROPERTY  INVESTORS-FOUR,  L.P.  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000700720
<NAME>NOONEY REAL PROPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P.
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                                    418,071
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             129,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          564,148
<PP&E>                                                 14,875,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                          7,718,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         11,622,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     389,992
<BONDS>                                                12,846,170
<COMMON>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                              1,685,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           11,622,352
<SALES>                                                   848,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          848,737
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          558,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        287,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             2,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2,371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. District Court

Eastern District of Michigan

PDF FILE WITH AUDIO FILE ATTACHMENT

2:15−cr−20382

USA v. Nicoletti

Office : 2 Detroit

Case Type : cr

Case Number : 2:15−cr−20382

Case Title : USA v. Nicoletti

Session Date/Time : 09/18/2015

Audio File Name : Nicoletti_20150918−1316_01d0f21435d28080.mp3

Audio File Size : 3.8 MB

Audio Run Time : Time unavailable

Help Using This File :

An audio file is embedded as an attachment in this PDF document. To listen to the file, click the Attachments tab

or the Paper Clip icon. Select the Audio File and click Open.

MPEG Layer−3 audio coding technology from Fraunhofer IIS and Thomson.

This digital recording is a copy of a court proceeding and is provided as a convenience to the public.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C.Â§ 753 (b) "[n]o transcripts of the proceedings of the court shall be

considered official exept those made from the records certified by the reporter or other individual

designated to produce the record."

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 09/18/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 14