alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 504.9 Information required by the Commission. ( a ) Upon request, a person filing a complaint, protest, petition or agreement requesting Commission action shall submit, no later than ten (10) days from the date of the request, a statement setting forth, in detail, the impact of the requested Commission action on the quality of the human environment, if such requested action will: ( 1 ) Alter cargo routing patterns between ports or change modes of transportation;
( 2 ) Change rates or services for recyclables;
( 3 ) Change the type, capacity or number of vessels employed in a specific trade; or
( 4 ) Alter terminal or port facilities.
( b ) The statement submitted shall, to the fullest extent possible, include: ( 1 ) The probable impact of the requested Commission action on the environment (*e.g.,* the use of energy or natural resources, the effect on air, noise, or water pollution), compared to the environmental impact created by existing uses in the area affected by it;
( 2 ) Any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the Commission were to take or adopt the requested action; and
( 3 ) Any alternatives to the requested Commission action.
( c ) If environmental impacts, either adverse or beneficial, are alleged, they should be sufficiently identified and quantified to permit meaningful review. Individuals may contact the Secretary of the Federal Maritime Commission for informal assistance in preparing this statement. The Commission shall independently evaluate the information submitted and shall be responsible for assuring its accuracy if used by it in the preparation of an environmental assessment or EIS.
( d ) In all cases, the Secretary may request every common carrier by water, or marine terminal operator, or any officer, agent or employee thereof, as well as all parties to proceedings before the Commission, to submit, within ten (10) days of such request, all material information necessary to comply with NEPA and this part. Information not produced in response to an informal request may be obtained by the Commission pursuant to section 15 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40104).
[49 FR 44415, Nov. 6, 1984; 49 FR 47395, Dec. 4, 1984, as amended at 64 FR 23550, May 3, 1999; 74 FR 50718, Oct. 1, 2009]
§ 61.35-3 Required tests and checks. ( a ) Tests and checks must include the following: ( 1 ) *Safety (Programming) controls.* Safety controls must control and cycle the unit in the proper manner and sequence. Proper prepurge, ignition, postpurge, and modulation must be verified. All time intervals must be verified.
( 2 ) *Flame safeguard.* The flame safeguard system must be tested by causing flame and ignition failures. Operation of the audible alarm and visible indicator must be verified. The shutdown times must be verified.
( 3 ) *Fuel supply controls.* Satisfactory shutdown operation of the two fuel control solenoid valves must be verified. No visible leakage from the valves into the burner(s) must be verified.
( 4 ) *Fuel oil pressure limit control.* A safety shutdown must be initiated by lowering the fuel oil pressure below the value required for safe combustion. System shutdown and the need for manual reset prior to automatic startup must be verified.
( 5 ) *Fuel oil temperature limit control.* (Units designed to burn heavy fuel oil.) A safety shutdown must be initiated by lowering the fuel oil temperature below the designed temperature. System shutdown and the need for manual reset prior to automatic startup must be verified.
( 6 ) *Combustion controls.* Smooth and stable operation of the combustion controls must be verified.
( 7 ) *Draft limit control.* The draft loss interlock switch must be tested to ensure proper operation. The draft limit control must cause burner shutdown and prevent startup when an inadequate air volume is supplied to the burner(s).
( 8 ) *Limit controls.* Shutdown caused by the limit controls must be verified.
( 9 ) *Water level controls.* Water level controls must be tested by slowly lowering the water level in the boiler. Each operating water level control must be individually tested. The upper low water cutoff and the lower low water cutoff must each be tested. The audible alarm and visible indicator associated with the lower low water cutoff must be tested. The manual reset device must be tested after the lower low water cutoff has been activated.
( 10 ) *Feed water flow controls.* The feed water flow limit device (found on steam boilers and water heaters without water level controls) must be tested by interrupting the feed water supply. Manual reset must be required prior to restarting the boiler.
( 11 ) *Low voltage test.* The fuel supply to the burners must automatically shut off when the supply voltage is lowered.
( 12 ) *Switches.* All switches must be tested to verify satisfactory operation.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 88-057, 55 FR 24237, June 15, 1990, as amended by USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50189, June 12, 2024]
Argued and submitted February 6,

affirmed September 27, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*DANIEL McGREW, *Respondent.*

(66989; CA A83930)

902 P2d 139

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*145PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged by information in district court with stalking, committed from September through November 1993, in violation of ORS 163.732, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court dismissed the case on defendant’s pretrial demurrer, ruling that the stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague. *See State v. Norris-Romine/Finley,*134 Or App 204, 894 P2d 1221 (1995). The district court lacked jurisdiction over the charges. *State v. Rudder,*133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367, *mod State v. Rudder/Webb,*137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995).

Affirmed.
§ 502.75 Opportunity for informal settlement. ( a ) Parties are encouraged to make use of all the procedures of this part that are designed to simplify or avoid formal litigation, and to assist the parties in reaching settlements whenever it appears that a particular procedure would be helpful.
( b ) Where time, the nature of the proceeding, and the public interest permit, all interested parties will have the opportunity for the submission and consideration of facts, argument, offers of settlement, or proposal of adjustment, without prejudice to the rights of the parties.
( c ) No settlement offer, or proposal will be admissible in evidence over the objection of any party in any hearing on the matter.
( d ) As soon as practicable after the commencement of any proceeding, the presiding officer will direct the parties or their representatives to consider the use of alternative dispute resolution, including but not limited to mediation, and may direct the parties or their representatives to consult with the Federal Maritime Commission Alternative Dispute Resolution Specialist about the feasibility of alternative dispute resolution.
( e ) Any party may request that a mediator or other neutral be appointed to assist the parties in reaching a settlement. If such a request or suggestion is made and is not opposed, the presiding officer will appoint a mediator or other neutral who is acceptable to all parties, coordinating with the Federal Maritime Commission Alternative Dispute Resolution Specialist. The mediator or other neutral will convene and conduct one or more mediation or other sessions with the parties and will inform the presiding officer, within the time prescribed by the presiding officer, whether the dispute resolution proceeding resulted in a resolution or not, and may make recommendations as to future proceedings. If settlement is reached, it will be submitted to the presiding officer who will issue an appropriate decision or ruling. All such dispute resolution proceedings are subject to the provisions of subpart U of this part.
( f ) Any party may request that a settlement judge be appointed to assist the parties in reaching a settlement. If such a request or suggestion is made and is not opposed, the presiding officer will advise the Chief Administrative Law Judge who may appoint a settlement judge who is acceptable to all parties. The settlement judge will convene and preside over conferences and settlement negotiations and will report to the presiding officer within the time prescribed by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, on the results of settlement discussions with appropriate recommendations as to future proceedings. If settlement is reached, it must be submitted to the presiding officer who will issue an appropriate decision or ruling. [Rule 75.]
[81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31095-31096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2820]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Agenda

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Thursday, June 14, 2007.

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The two items are open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    7896 Pipeline Accident Brief and Safety Recommendation Letters--
Anhydrous Ammonia Pipeline Rupture Near Kingman, Kansas, October 27, 
2004.

[[Page 31096]]

    7856 A Marine Accident Report--Fire Aboard Construction Barge 
Athena 106, West Cote Blanche Bay, Louisiana, October 12, 2006.

News Media Contact

    Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, June 8, 2007.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: June 1, 2007.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-2820 Filed 6-1-07; 3:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-07-M
I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated Medical
Management, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 22, 2006


/s/Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.
-----------------------
Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.
Acting Chief Accounting Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending June 28, 2008

|Filer                              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|HERITAGE BANCORP, INC.             | * 3A1          | Heritage Bancorp, Inc., Pearland, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Red River Financial Corporation, Detroit, Texas, and indirectly acquire Community National Bank, Detroit, Texas. | Newspaper:07/28/2008Federal Register:07/22/2008       
|Newspaper:                         | 07/28/2008    
|Federal Register:                  | 07/22/2008    
|LONE STAR STATE BANK OF WEST TEXAS | * 18C* Branch  | Lone Star State Bank of West Texas, Lubbock, Texas, to merge with First Bank of Brownfield, Brownfield, Texas, and establish a branch at 2599 74th Street, Lubbock, Texas 79423.                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | Not available 
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 69.171 When the tonnage mark is considered submerged. For the purpose of this subpart, a tonnage mark is considered submerged when— ( a ) In salt or brackish water, the upper edge of the tonnage mark is submerged; and
( b ) In fresh or tropical water, the upper edge of the line for fresh and tropical waters is submerged.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending September 27, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 7.150 Canadian (BC) and United States (AK) Borders to Cape Spencer, AK. ( a ) A line drawn from the northeasternmost extremity of Point Mansfield, Sitklan Island 040° true to the mainland.
( b ) A line drawn from the southeasternmost extremity of Island Point, Sitklan Island to the southernmost extremity of Garnet Point, Kanagunut Island; thence to Lord Rock Light; thence to Barren Island Light; thence to Cape Chacon Light; thence to Cape Muzon Light.
( c ) A line drawn from Point Cornwallis Light to Cape Bartolome Light; thence to Cape Edgecumbe Light; thence to the westernmost extremity of Cape Cross.
( d ) A line drawn from Surge Bay Entrance Light to Cape Spencer Light.
#### § 61.20-15 Tailshaft examination.

The rules in §§ 61.20-15 through 61.20-23 apply only to vessels in ocean and coastwise service. Each examination, inspection and test prescribed by these sections must be conducted in the presence of a marine inspector.

[CGD 78-153, 45 FR 52388, Aug. 7, 1980]
Eonarable GeoPge B. Qwqqmrd 

Caaptroller of Publlo ;Zcoouts 

Austin, Texss. 

,,’ 

/ 

i 

E4ar Sir: oplnicul 340. o-5028 

R81 Oarrrrtruafion or th* t8Tm 

%a~I4ipal tama* ‘a0 11846 

in sea. 2, Art. 73361, 

V. A. G. 9. 
!
**Exhibit 11
 

INDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY

Computation of Per Share Earnings

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

								** **THREE MONTHS ENDED **MARCH 31, **2001 **2000**INCOME:  
 Net income
$
4,061 
$
2,358   **SHARES:  
 Weighted average common shares outstanding 
7,878  
7,898   **BASIC INCOME PER SHARE:  
 Net income per share
$
.52 
$
.30   **DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (A)   **USE OF PROCEEDS:  
 Assumed exercise of options
$
6,242 
$
1,435
 Tax benefit from assumed exercise of options
850 
414
 Repurchase of treasury stock at the average market  
  price per share of $13.29 and $10.48, respectively 
(7,092)  
(1,849)
 Assumed balance to be invested
$
- 
$
-   **SHARES:  
 Weighted average shares outstanding
7,878 
7,898
 Shares assumed issued for options
658 
253
 Treasury stock assumed purchased 
(534)  
(176)
 Adjusted average shares outstanding 
8,002  
7,975   **DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE:  
 Net income per share
$
.51 
$
.30**(A)  Warrants were not assumed to be exercised as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.************************
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending February 2, 2008

----

Bank Holding CompaniesFirst National Bank Group, Inc., Edinburg, Texas  -- to acquire shares of Southside Bancshares, Incorporated, Tyler, and thereby acquire its subsidiaries, Southside Bank and Fort Worth National Bank, Fort Worth. 					-Approved, February 1, 2008 					

Discount RatesDiscount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 4 percent to 3-1/2 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Kansas City, and San Francisco.					-Approved, January 30, 2008 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 4 percent to 3-1/2 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond, Minneapolis, and Dallas.					-Approved, January 31, 2008 					

EnforcementUnited Bancshares, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  -- written agreement dated February 23, 2000, terminated January 22, 2008.					-Announced, January 28, 2008 					

PersonnelDivision of Banking Supervision and Regulation  -- appointment of Norah Barger as Deputy Director; Adrienne Haden as Assistant Director; and Tim Clark and Nida Davis as Senior Advisors.					-Approved, January 31, 2008 					Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems  -- appointment of Jeff Stehm as Associate Director; Lisa Hoskins and Gregory Evans as Deputy Associate Directors; Susan Foley and Leonard Tanis as Assistant Directors; and Jack Walton, II as Senior Advisor, effective March 2, 2008.					-Approved, February 1, 2008 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: February 7, 2008
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending December 27, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|COMMUNITY BANK    | * Branch       | Community Bank, Granbury, Texas, establish a branch to be located at 1300 South University Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76107. | Newspaper:12/17/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 12/17/2008    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us