alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 57.06-3 Method of performing production testing. ( a ) Except as otherwise specified in this section a test plate must be attached to the shell plate on one end of the longitudinal joint of each vessel as shown in figure 1 to § 57.06-3(d), so that the edges of the test plate to be welded are a continuation of and duplication of the corresponding edges of the longitudinal joint. For attached test plates, the weld metal must be deposited in the test plate welding groove continuously with the weld metal deposited in the groove of the longitudinal joint. As an alternate method, the marine inspector may permit the use of separate test plates, provided the same welding process, procedure, and technique employed in the fabrication of the longitudinal joint are used in welding the test plates.
( b ) All test plates, whether attached to the shell or separate in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section, must be prepared from material of the same specification, thickness, and heat treatment and, for Class I-L and Class II-L vessels, the same heat as that of the vessel for which they are required. However, except when required to be from a specific heat, test plates may be prepared from material of a different product form, such as plate in lieu of a forging, provided the chemical composition is within the vessel material specification limits and the melting practice is the same.
( c ) Test plates are not required for welded nozzle attachments.
( d ) In the case of vessels having no longitudinal welded joints, at least one set of test plates must be welded for each vessel, using the circumferential joint process, procedure, and technique, except that the provisions of § 57.06-2(a) also apply for Classes I and I-L vessels, and that the provisions of § 57.06-2(a) and (c) also apply for Classes II and II-L vessels. Figure 1 to § 57.06-3(d)—(PW-53.2) Method of Forming Longitudinal Test Plates
( e ) Test plates must be made by the same welder producing the longitudinal and circumferential joints. If more than one welder is employed in the welding of the pressure vessel(s), the test plates must be made by the welder designated by the marine inspector. The test plates must be of the same thickness as the material being welded and must be of sufficient size to provide two specimens of each type required, except that in the case of pressure vessels having no longitudinal seams, the test plate need be only of sufficient length to provide one set of test specimens, and if a retest is necessary, an additional set of test plates may be welded separately.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re: Case No. 06-55754

GLENN RICHARD UNDERWOOD, Chapter 11

Debtor. Judge Thomas J. Tucker

 /

GLENN RICHARD UNDERWOOD, pro se,

Plaintiff,

v. Adv. Pro. No. 14-4966

PATRICIA SELENT, pro se, et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME 

FOR FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL

This adversary proceeding is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion entitled “Motion for

Request to Extend Time for Filing a Notice of Appeal Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(c)(2),”

filed on January 5, 2015 (Docket # 76, the “Motion”). The Motion requests an extension of time

to file a notice of appeal from the Court’s interlocutory order, filed on December 10, 2014,

which, among other things, dismissed Counts I, II, and III of Plaintiff’s complaint, with prejudice

(Docket # 65, the “December 10 Order”). The Court will deny the Motion because it was not

timely filed, and because the Motion does not demonstrate excusable neglect. 

Fed. R. Bankr P. 8002(a)(1) states: “Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), a

notice of appeal must be filed with the bankruptcy clerk within 14 days after entry of the

judgment, order, or decree being appealed.” 

Fed. R. Bankr P. 8002(d)(1) provides:

(1) When the time may be extended 

Except as provided in subdivision (d)(2), the bankruptcy court may

extend the time to file a notice of appeal upon a party’s motion that

is filed: 

4:15-cv-10155-LVP-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 01/26/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 17
 The Motion includes the following allegation, on page 2, in ¶ 4: “Plaintiff Underwood was 1

informed that the courts closed early on December 24, 2014.” The Motion does not say who informed

Plaintiff of this, but Plaintiff is incorrect about an early closing on December 24. The Bankruptcy Court

Clerk’s office in Detroit was open and available to accept documents for filing all day, until its normal

closing time (4:00 p.m.) on December 24, 2014.

2

(A) within the time prescribed by this rule; or 

(B) within 21 days after that time, if the party shows

excusable neglect. 

Under Fed. R. Bankr P. 8002(a)(1), the deadline to file a notice of appeal of the

December 10 Order was December 24, 2014. The Motion was not filed within the 14-day

1

period prescribed by the rule. Rather, the Motion was filed 12 days after the deadline expired. 

But because the Motion was filed within 21 days after the deadline, the Motion could be

considered timely, but if and only if Plaintiff has shown that the Motion was filed as late as it

was due to “excusable neglect.” 

The Court concludes that the Motion does not demonstrate excusable neglect for filing

the Motion after December 24, 2014, and as late as January 5, 2015, when it was filed.

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Docket # 76) is denied.

Signed on January 26, 2015 /s/ Thomas J. Tucker 

Thomas J. Tucker

United States Bankruptcy Judge

4:15-cv-10155-LVP-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 01/26/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 18
§ 58.05-1 Material, design, and construction. ( a ) The material, design, construction, workmanship, and arrangement of main propulsion machinery and of each auxiliary, directly connected to the engine and supplied as such, must be at least equivalent to the standards established by the ABS Marine Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference, see § 58.03-1), except as otherwise provided by this subchapter.
( b ) When main and auxiliary machinery is to be installed without classification society review, the builder must submit to the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, such drawings and particulars of the installation as are required by the ABS Marine Vessel Rules for similar installations on classed vessels.
[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50172, June 12, 2024]
p. 1 

CBIC Control Number 

ARI~EMA OPPT-2006-0621 356788 

" Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: PAULA 

David A. Kreh 

Global Supply Chain Director ^' 0 

Fluoropolymers 4, 

O 

n 

October 30, 2013 

OPPT Document Control Office (DCO) 

Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0621 

1201 Constitution Ave NW 

EPA East Building Room 6428 

Washington, DC 20004 

W 

-n 

N 

Re: Arkema Inc. 2012 update reporting for EPA 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program 

Dear Sir or Madame, 

Arkema Inc. herewith submits its 2012 update report on emissions and product content as part 

of EPA's 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program. Arkema is continuing to work to reduce 

emissions and product content of perfluorinated compounds consistent with the Stewardship 

Program . 

O z, 'C7 r, 

'L4 n 

--t r7-n 

GUM 

c~ © 

This submission contains confidential business information and should be handled accordingly. 

S~ince~rely , 

David A. Kreh 

Global Supply Chain Director 

Fluoropolymers 

david.kreh(~r)arkema .com 

610-205-7548 

COMPANY SANITIZED 

Arkema Inc. 

900 1" Avenue 

King of Prussia, PA 19406 

Tel. : 610-205-7548 

david.kreh@arkema.com 

www.arkema.com 
C~S 

0 ~. 

a 

y 

V 

O 

a 

O 

0 

N 

C 

0 

U 

V 0

e^ 

O 

.~ 

,~I~~yyyW 

4-4 0 

0 

a 

0 

U 

M_ 

0 

N 

N 

° 

U 0 

F 

A 

a 

O 

F 

U 

W 

z 

u 

UD 

0 

Z Z Z 

4~ 4~ > 0 . 

-cod 

Ps 

CL 0 Q 0 

tn 00 

C) 

o CD 

0 I:L~ I ~ I Z m 

C~ 40. 

CD CD 

CD o 

48 A A 

0 

up 

+ 

CD mu 

Cd 

CD 

CD 

2 

w CL 

z a 

co 

CD C) 

CD C) 

kf) W) Q A 

cn 

CD 0 4 - I'd 

CD 

m 

rA 

z 0 

0 Cod R 

;Lq 

z 

zcd 

cr 

ej 

7 El od 9 

> 

0 0 48. 40, 

0 

rA 041 en m m 
m 

7 

.pq ,.^~+ 

009 a';, ai 

°' ~ ~ 3 d d d ~ o 

z ~ .~' z z z z on 

o 

F H . O F. 

N 

p 

N  

a 

p 

a ° q cu 

x ~a 

-~ 

O ~ p 

w 

'" 

c °O "I0 3~ 5, " ^~ O 

O 

c`' o ~ 0 3 

~ O a N ' ~ ~ " ~ ~` Q , O 

N ~'.. . . 

O 

,-: a ~ A a 

a. o 

`~t O j p ° pb 

c ° ° ° ° 

N 

n n 

x 

p " 

p p 

ey 

q 

F+ N 

~ q, p 

C 

F 

4 a z z z ° 

z 2 TTTi p~ 

N 

~ 

C 

s, 3 Q4 p 

"F~ O 7 Q $ Jp cN3 

44 O w b 

U ~ n 

O ~ ° ~a 

~ 

 

V ° N ° N 

o 

~7y ~, y p 

ti 

~ ~ 

aw 

y 

o 

. 

obo ° 

d o ~ 

"'obo ; .c ~ ;~ o ~ 

°w ° o w °w b o i: o o ,_ a ,U a ~a a w ~ .a a. ~ 

r~7 

v~ 

O 

o 

p~ 

G' 

p 

o 

v, 

o i " 

1 

~ v m 

b b 5 , 

O a ~ 

c 

~ 

w 

a 

° 

~' 

~ 

U 

z 

O V 

. a 

O 

V~' V 

I 

O 'F ,0 

o 

° 

.9 I 

° q " O Frl 

_o o~~ V 

U .I7 

WJw 

" q~ U 

°o 

v F 

° °° °~ ° o O 

U 

N 

0 .5 

o O o ~~ z 

'O k 

u 

.k i 

~o ~'q b y ~ "0 ~ 

~°e 0 _q eA ° a T '°yC e°'9 W O0 "~° J' ~"-' N r 'o 

o O . y 

M d 

" .U, N U 

",}j ~ y 

~ e0 r. ~ b ~ p "~'v 

¢ ~ ° b .~ ~. 

o~'". .N..o 

$ .~ 3 

o a q ~ a~ ~y 

,b, ~ X '~ c a, d d d 0 

~ `. . o ~ o ~ w w w " `°oC'° °' ~,°~a ~a Qo w ~e ~ x x 

a~ v v 

m E a n ,a° a-a'ovv 

,~' v' U 7 7 7 ? 0 0 0 

~S. " ° y .F°, ,Y 3 N N N 

o w° Y ~ C o ~ a a O. O q q 'F 04 .4 O C

> > > .U w ~ o U o ~ F_F,F 

.~O 

> T
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BRADLEY A. ARNDT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:15-cv-11108 

v. District Judge Paul D. Borman 

 Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S REPLY DATE TO AUGUST 31, 

2016 

 Defendant filed its motion for summary judgment on May 2, 2016. (DE 75.) 

The matter was set for a hearing before Judge Borman on August 31, 2016. (DE 

76.) On May 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend his reply date until July 

25, 2016. (DE 77.) I granted Plaintiff’s motion on May 20, 2016 and noted that 

Defendant’s reply date would be similarly extended to August 9, 2016. (DE 80.) 

Thereafter, Defendant filed a request for a conference regarding the extension, 

explaining that counsel would be unavailable for most of August. (DE 81.) 

 The parties spoke with my law clerk on May 24, 2016, and agreed to extend 

the reply date to August 31, 2016, as long as the hearing on the motion could 

likewise be extended to a date in September. Accordingly, Defendant’s reply shall 

2:15-cv-11108-PDB-APP Doc # 82 Filed 05/25/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2319
2

be filed ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 31, 2016. As a result, Judge Borman will 

issue a revised order re-setting the hearing date to a time that is convenient to the 

Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 25, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on May 25, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/ Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-cv-11108-PDB-APP Doc # 82 Filed 05/25/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2320
- 1 - 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

SAMUEL R. JONES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 15-12527 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 

WAYNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 52) 

 This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment. On December 18, 2017, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford 

issued a report and recommendation recommending that defendants’ 

motion be granted and the Court dismiss a claim sua sponte. (Doc. 52). 

The court has reviewed the file, record, and magistrate judge’s report 

and recommendation. Objections to that report have not been filed by 

Jones within the established time period. The court accepts the report and 

recommendation. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation is accepted. 
- 2 - 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment is GRANTED. Jones’ unexhausted claims shall be DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jones’ claim of black mold in the 

shower be DISMISSED sua sponte. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 16, 2018 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

 GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on 

January 16, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also 

on Samuel R. Jones #364868, Earnest C. Brooks Correctional 

Facility, 2500 S. Sheridan Drive, Muskegon Heights, MI 49444. 

s/Barbara Radke 

Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Little, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

March 26, 2008
EXHIBIT 21LIST OF SUBSIDIARIESSapient Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australian company, wholly-owned)Sapient Canada Inc. (Ontario corporation, wholly-owned)Sapient Corporation Private Limited (India company, wholly-owned)Sapient GmbH (German company, wholly-owned)Sapient Government Services, Inc. (Delaware corporation, wholly-owned)Sapient Limited (UK limited liability company, wholly-owned)Sapient Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands company, wholly-owned)Sapient Sweden AB (Sweden company, wholly-owned)Sapient Securities Corporation (Massachusetts corporation, wholly-owned)Sapient Switzerland AG (Swedish company, wholly-owned)
§ 32.53-1 Application—T/ALL. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, this subpart applies to: ( 1 ) A U.S. crude oil tanker or product carrier of 100,000 DWT tons (metric) or more or combination carrier of 50,000 DWT tons (metric) or more, that has a keel laying date on or after January 1, 1975.
( 2 ) A new (as defined in 46 U.S.C. 3701) crude oil tanker or product carrier, or foreign flag crude oil tanker or product carrier of 20,000 DWT tons or more entering the navigable waters of the U.S.
( 3 ) A crude oil tanker that is equipped with a cargo tank cleaning system that uses crude oil washing.
( 4 ) An existing product carrier of 20,000 deadweight tons (metric) or more that has tank washing machines with a capacity of more than 60 cubic meters per hour after May 31, 1983.
( 5 ) Any other U.S. or foreign flag: ( i ) Crude oil tanker or product carrier of 70,000 deadweight tons (metric) and over after May 31, 1981;
( ii ) Crude oil tanker between 20,000 and 70,000 deadweight tons (metric) after May 31, 1983;
( iii ) Product carrier between 40,000 and 70,000 deadweight tons (metric) after May 31, 1983.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to vessels designed to carry only: ( 1 ) Liquefied gas cargo; or
( 2 ) Grade E cargo that is carried at a temperature lower than 5 °C below its flash point.
( c ) This part does not apply to vessels as stated in 46 U.S.C. 3702.
[CGD 77-057a, 44 FR 66501, Nov. 19, 1979, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51043, Sept. 30, 1997; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51198, Sept. 30, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTRIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,662
<SECURITIES>                                       673
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,233
<INVENTORY>                                     15,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,071
<PP&E>                                          47,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,509
<BONDS>                                          1,604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           234
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,192
<SALES>                                         52,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,769
<CGS>                                           17,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,093<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,483
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,483
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<FN>
<F1>Amount presented represents engineering and development expense.
<F2>Amount presented represents basic EPS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2498 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2498

 To designate the Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in 
  Chicago, Illinois, as the ``William O. Lipinski Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in 
  Chicago, Illinois, as the ``William O. Lipinski Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in Chicago, 
Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``William O. Lipinski 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William O. 
Lipinski Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT - ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT


Pursuant to the provisions of Section  16-10-a-1002 of the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act, this  "Corporation"  adopts the following Articles of Amendment
to its Articles of Incorporation:

1. The name of the Corporation is Mammoth Resources, Inc.

2. The following  Article of the Articles of Incorporation is amended to read as
follows:

Article I is replaced with the following:

The name of the corporation is hereby changed to:

Symphony Telecom International, Inc.

3. The date of adoption of this Amendment was March 23, 2000.

4. The foregoing was voted upon with unanimous  (100%)  approval of the Board of
Directors, without the need for shareholder approval.

5. The effective time and date of these articles of amendment  shall be the date
and time of filing with the State of Utah. Executed on March 23, 2000.

Signatures:  /s/ Daniel Cullen, President
             -----------------------------
                 Daniel Cullen, President

            /s/  Gilles Trahan, Secretary
            ------------------------------
                 Gilles Trahan, Secretary
MIE (Rev. 9/09) Order Re: Disqualification of Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

United States of America,

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 

v. Honorable

Defendant(s).

/

ORDER RE: DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, I hereby DISQUALIFY myself from the above-styled case.

IT IS ORDERED that in accordance with E.D. Mich. LCrR 57.10(c), this case be reassigned by blind draw

to another judge of this court.

Date:

U.S. District Judge

Pursuant to this order, this case is reassigned to Judge .

Case assignment credit will be given to the appropriate Judicial Officers.

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing Order was served upon the parties and/or counsel

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

Date:

Deputy Clerk

SHAHID TAHIR, WASEEM ALAM, HATEM

ATAYA, MANAWAR JAVED, MUHAMMAD TARIQ

15-20351

Victoria A. Roberts

June 24, 2015

Sean F. Cox

June 26, 2015 s/ S Schoenherr

s/Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 66 Filed 06/26/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 162
#### § 565.13 OMB control number assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Commission has received OMB approval for this collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended. In accordance with that Act, agencies are required to display a currently valid control number. The valid control number for this collection of information is 3072-0060.