alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US Airways, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), W. Douglas Parker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Derek J. Kerr, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1)     The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)     The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ W. Douglas
Parker

Name:  W. Douglas Parker 
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 22, 2009 /s/ Derek J.
Kerr

Name:  Derek J. Kerr 
Title:  Chief Financial Officer 
Date:  April 22,
2009 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 64.63 Minimum emergency venting capacity.

(a) The total emergency venting capacity (*Q*) of the relief devices of an uninsulated MPT must be in accordance with table 1 to [§ 64.63](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-64.63) or the following formula based upon the pressure relief device operating at a pressure not to exceed the test pressure:

Formula 1 to Paragraph (a)

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER12JN24.018/ER12JN24.018_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER12JN24.018/ER12JN24.018_original_size.png)

Where:

*Q* = Minimum required rate of discharge in cubic feet per minute of free air at standard conditions (60 °F and 14.7 psia).

*M* = Molecular weight of the product, or 86.7.

*T* = Temperature, degrees Rankine (460° + temperature in °F of gas at relieving temperature), or 710 °R.

*A* = Total external surface area of the tank compartment in square feet.

*L* = Latent heat of the product being vaporized at relieving conditions in Btu per pound, or 144 Btu per pound.

*Z* = Compressibility factor of the gas at relieving conditions, or 1.0.

*C* = Constant based on relation of specific heats, equal to 315.

(b) The total emergency venting capacity (*Q*) of an insulated portable tank may have a reduction if—

(1) It is shown to the Coast Guard that the insulation reduces the heat transmission to the tank;

(2) The present reduction of the emergency venting capacity (*Q*) is limited to the percent reduction of the heat transmission to the tank or 50 percent, whichever is less; and

(3) The insulation is sheathed.

Table 1 to [§ 64.63](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-64.63)—Minimum Emergency Venting Capacity in Cubic Feet: Free Air/Hour

[14.7 lb/in2 a and 60 °F]

| Exposed area square feet1 | Cubic feet free air per hour | Exposed area square feet1 | Cubic feet free air per hour |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20 | 27,600 | 275 | 237,000 |
| 30 | 38,500 | 300 | 256,000 |
| 40 | 48,600 | 350 | 289,500 |
| 50 | 58,600 | 400 | 322,100 |
| 60 | 67,700 | 450 | 355,900 |
| 70 | 77,000 | 500 | 391,000 |
| 80 | 85,500 | 550 | 417,500 |
| 90 | 94,800 | 600 | 450,000 |
| 100 | 104,000 | 650 | 479,000 |
| 120 | 121,000 | 700 | 512,000 |
| 140 | 136,200 | 750 | 540,000 |
| 160 | 152,100 | 800 | 569,000 |
| 180 | 168,200 | 850 | 597,000 |
| 200 | 184,000 | 900 | 621,000 |
| 225 | 199,000 | 950 | 656,000 |
| 250 | 219,500 | 1,000 | 685,000 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Interpolate for intermediate sizes. | | | |

[CGD 73-172, [39 FR 22950](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/39-FR-22950), June 25, 1974, as amended by CGD 84-043, [55 FR 37410](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-37410), Sept. 11, 1990; [55 FR 47477](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-47477), Nov. 14, 1990; USCG-2020-0634, [89 FR 50199](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-50199), June 12, 2024]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24-F



                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints DOUGLAS D. BURKETT, PH.D. and BRADLEY C. ANDERSON, and each of them,
his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2002, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Special Power of Attorney has been executed as
of November 13, 2002.

                                          /s/ MICHAEL S. LESSER
                                          -----------------------
                                              MICHAEL S. LESSER
ALEX JEAN

- GILLES

,
Appellant,

v.

DYCK

- O'NEAL, INC.

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1040

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Virginia Norton , Judge

.

Eric C. Roberson of Eric C. Roberson, P.A., Jacksonville , for Appellant.

Susan B. Morrison and Lauren E. Wages of Law Office of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L., Tampa , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON

, ROWE

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Colin M. Cohen, certify that:



|(1) |  | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of Aviall, Inc.;
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |    
|--------------------- |  | ---
|Date: August 21, 2003 |  | By:
|                      |  |    



6
#### § 30.10-65 Tank barge—B/ALL.

The term *tank barge* means a nonself-propelled tank vessel.

[CGD 79-116, 62 FR 25135, May 8, 1997]
# C_2013225EN.01006501.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/65

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2013 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-2/11) (1)

1

(EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred in connection with the POSEI measure (financial years 2005, 2006 and 2007))

2013/C 225/144

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo and J. Saraiva de Almeida, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and P. Rossi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/668/EU of 4 November 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2010 L 288, p. 24), in so far as it applies a financial correction to the Portuguese Republic in connection with the POSEI measure in respect of the 2005 to 2007 financial years, for a total amount of EUR 743 251,25.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2010/668/EU of 4 November 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2010 L 288, p. 24), in so far as it applies to the Portuguese Republic a financial correction in connection with the POSEI measure in respect of the 2006 and 2007 financial years; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2010/668/EU of 4 November 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2010 L 288, p. 24), in so far as it applies to the Portuguese Republic a financial correction in connection with the POSEI measure in respect of the 2006 and 2007 financial years;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.

1

---
FMC Reading Room

          - ** Proceedings
          - ** Documents

### Search Proceedings

select

| Number | Title |
|--------|-------|

*-- ALL --*

                  - -- ALL --
                  - Dockets
                  - Petition
                  - Notice of Inquiry
                  - Fact Finding
                  - Special Permission
                  - Special Investigation

*-- ALL --*

                  - -- ALL --
                  - No
                  - Yes
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1.   | The                Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June                30,                2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the                "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operation                of the                Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**In      Witness Whereof**

| /s/                H. Ravi Brar    H.                Ravi BrarChief                Financial Officer and Vice                President of Human Resources  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
Submitted on record and briefs April 18,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration October 25, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Robbie W. Worthen, Deceased, Claimant. Dorothy WORTHEN, Personal Representative for the Estate of Robbie W. Worthen, *Petitioner, v.*LUMBERMEN’S UNDERWRITING ALLIANCE, INC. *Respondent.*

(WCB TP-93011; CA A83303)

904 P2d 1091

G. Jefferson Campbell, Jr., filed the brief for petitioner.

Kenneth L. Kleinsmith and Meyers, Radler, Replogle & Bohy filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Worthen v. Lumbermen’s Underwriting (A84846),*137 Or App 368, 904 P2d 1088 (1995).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANAGEMENT LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826918
<NAME> MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           377,031
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 377,031
<CASH>                                          97,913
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             453,556
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          22,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,953,987
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                538,575
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            166,763
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           37,925
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                127,517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           385
<OTHER-SE>                                     246,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,953,987
<PREMIUMS>                                      62,530
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             19,695
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,083)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  83,510
<BENEFITS>                                      37,125
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     26,412
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            57,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,936
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0 
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Elias Howard, *as General Guardian, etc.,*Appellant, *v.*Phebe Stillwell and others, *Respondents.*

Order admitting to probate will of George Stillwell affirmed, witb costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Intent To Grant an Exclusive License of a U.S. Government-Owned 
Patent

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(l)(i), 
announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-
bearing, revocable license within the geographic area of the United 
States of America and its territories and possessions to U.S. Patent 
application 11/279,027, filed April 7, 2007 entitled ``Artillery Rocket 
Kinetic Energy Rod Warhead'', to General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical 
Systems with its principal place of business at 4565 Commercial Drive, 
Niceville, FL 32578.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering 
Command, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg 5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 
35898-5000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For licensing issues, Dr. Russ 
Alexander, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 876-
8743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One object of the present invention is to 
realize a highly accurate Kinetic Energy (KE) rod warhead. Another 
object is to provide an easily assembled KE rod warhead. Yet another 
object is to provide a warhead that removes the problems inherent with 
unexploded ordnance. These and other objects are provided by a warhead 
having a plurality of tier pack bulkheads arranged in a stacked 
formation around a center column to form a plurality of tier packs. A 
plurality of skin severance trays are connected to the plurality of 
tier pack bulkheads. A bulkhead collar and an aft bulkhead are 
connected to the center column with the plurality of tier packs being 
positioned between the bulkhead collar and the aft bulkhead. A 
plurality of holding trays, separated by dividers, is positioned within 
the plurality of tier packs, the holding trays being positioned between 
respective tier pack bulkheads. The holding trays are filled with KE 
rods.


Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer
[FR Doc. 07-2261 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7492

MARK ENGLISH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00571-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark English, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark English seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) 

(explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from

latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez, 565 U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th

Cir. R. 34(b). Because English’s informal brief does not challenge the dispositive 

timeliness determination by the district court, he has forfeited appellate review. See 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

p0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141007

EMMA McCREARY, Plaintiff,

v SC: 141007 AGC: 2455/05 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.