alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis                           ( print page 35058)                        Panel, July 18, 2007, 8 a.m. to July 18, 2007, 6 p.m., Hilton Crystal City, 2399 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 15, 2007, FR 07-2972.                

The meeting location was changed from Hilton Crystal City to State Plaza Hotel, Washington, DC. The rest of the information remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 20, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-3118 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MGI PHARMA, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Hawley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James C. HawleyJames C. HawleySenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33789-33790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Submission of OMB Review; Comments Request

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the Agency has prepared an 
information collection

[[Page 33790]]

request for OMB review and approval and has requested public review and 
comment on the submission. Comments are being solicited on the need for 
the information; the accuracy of the Agency's burden estimate; the 
quality, practical utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and on ways to minimize the reporting burden, including 
automated collection techniques and uses of other forms of technology. 
The proposed form under review, OMB control number 3420-0015, is 
summarized below.

DATES: Comments must be received within 60 calendar-days of publication 
of this Notice.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form and the request for review 
prepared for submission to OMB may be obtained from the Agency 
Submitting Officer. Comments on the form should be submitted to the 
Agency Submitting Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Agency Submitting Officer: Essie 
Bryant, Records Management Officer, Overseas Private Investment 
Corporation, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20527; (202) 
336-8563.

Summary of Form Under Review

    Type of Request: Revised Form.
    Title: Application for Financing.
    Form Number: OPIC-115.
    Frequency of Use: One per investor, per project.
    Type of Respondents: Business or other institution (except farms); 
individuals.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies or citizens 
investing overseas.
    Reporting Hours: 3.15 hours per project.
    Number of Responses: 150 per year.
    Federal Cost: $21,975.
    Authority for Information Collection: Section 231 and 234(b) and 
(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The OPIC 115 form is the principal 
document used by OPIC to determine the investor's and the project's 
eligibility for debt financing, assess the environmental impact and 
developmental effects of the project, measure the economic effects for 
the United States and the host country economy, and collect information 
for underwriting and worker rights analysis.

    June 14, 2007.
John Crowley, III,
Senior Administrative Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 07-3006 Filed 6-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7372
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus GARY DIXON; STATE OF NORTH CAROL INA; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LYNN PHILLIPS; MICHAEL EASLEY, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-108-5-F) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: July 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Although we note that the district court did not specifically address Appellant'sclaim that his probation revocation was based on perjured testimony, it was not an abuse of discretion to dismiss this allegation of a "vague, conclusory or palpably incredible nature" without a hearing. See Raines v. United States , 423 F.2d 526, 531 (4th Cir. 1970) (quoting Machibroda v. United States , 368 U.S. 487, 495 (1962)). With regard to the three remaining claims, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the r easoning of the district court. Tucker v. Dixon , No. CA-94-108-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 69.23 Fees.

Measurement organizations are authorized to charge a fee for measurement services. Information on fees is available directly from the organizations.

[CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 67.75 Transfers by sale or donation subsequent to documentation. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, transfers of vessel title must be evidenced by a bill of sale which meets the criteria for filing and recording set forth in subpart P of this part. Except as otherwise provided in subpart O of this part, each bill of sale must be accompanied by a declaration of citizenship from the new owner, executed on the appropriate Maritime Administration form described in § 67.211.
( b ) The bill of sale form used may be form CG-1340 or form CG-1356, as appropriate.
( c ) An applicant for documentation who cannot produce required title evidence in the form of an instrument eligible for filing and recording in accordance with subpart P of this part may apply for a waiver of that requirement in accordance with the provisions of § 67.89.
# C_2013225EN.01008301.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/83

---

Order of the General Court of 27 May 2013 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-45/11) (1)

1

2013/C 225/186

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
§ 71.50-3 Drydock examination, internal structural examination, underwater survey, and alternate hull exam intervals. ( a ) If your vessel is operated on international voyages, it must undergo a drydock and internal structural examination once every 12 months unless it has been approved to undergo an underwater survey per § 71.50-5 of this part.
( b ) If your vessel is operated on other than international voyages and does not meet the conditions in paragraphs (c) through (f) of this section, it must undergo a drydock and internal structural examination as follows unless it has been approved to undergo an underwater survey per § 71.50-5 of this part: ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, vessels that operate in salt water must undergo two drydock and two internal structural examinations within any five year period. No more than three years may elapse between any two examinations.
( 2 ) Vessels 20 years of age or older that operate in salt water and accommodate overnight passengers must undergo drydock and internal structural examinations at intervals not to exceed 18 months.
( 3 ) Vessels that operate in fresh water at least six months in every 12 month period since the last drydock examination must undergo drydock and internal structural examinations at intervals not to exceed five years.
( c ) Vessels with wooden hulls must undergo two drydock and two internal structural examinations within any five year period regardless of the type of water in which they operate. No more than three years may elapse between any two examinations.
( d ) If, during an internal structural examination, damage or deterioration to the hull plating or structural members is discovered, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require the vessel to be drydocked or otherwise taken out of service to further assess the extent of the damage and to effect permanent repairs.
( e ) Each vessel which has not met the applicable examination schedules in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section because it is on a voyage, must undergo the required examinations upon completion of the voyage.
( f ) For a vessel that is eligible per § 71.50-17 and the owner opts for an alternate hull examination with the underwater survey portion conducted exclusively by divers, the vessel must undergo two alternate hull exams and two internal structural exams within any five-year period. If a vessel completes a satisfactory alternate hull exam, with the underwater survey portion conducted predominantly by an approved underwater ROV, the vessel must undergo one alternate hull and one internal structural exam, within any five-year period. The vessel may undergo a drydock exam to satisfy any of the required alternate hull exams.
( g ) The Commandant (CG-CVC) may authorize extensions to the examination intervals specified in paragraph (a) through (c) of this section.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39652, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended by CGD 84-024, 53 FR 32231, Aug. 24, 1988; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50463, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50729, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21076, Apr. 29, 2002; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49231, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59779, Oct. 1, 2012]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 7, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TORRANCE JONES, a/k/a Tube,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-79-BO)

Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: May 21, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Torrance Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

May 28, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on June 4, 1998. Pursuant to Rule 4(b)(1) of

the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, it is the date that the

order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective

date of the district court’s decision.

2

PER CURIAM:

Torrance Jones filed an untimely notice of appeal from the

district court’s denial of his post-judgment motion to correct an

alleged error in the transcript of his criminal trial. A defendant

in a criminal action is accorded ten days from entry of the

judgment or order being appealed within which to file a notice of

appeal in the district court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); cf.

United States v. Kress, 944 F.2d 155, 161 (3d Cir. 1991) (applying

ten-day appeal period to district court’s order denying Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35 motion). The district court may extend this appeal

period only upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause. An

extension of time may not exceed thirty days from the expiration of

the time otherwise prescribed. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4).

The district court entered its order on June 4, 1998;* Jones’

notice of appeal was given to prison officials for mailing, and

thus deemed filed, on September 9, 1998. Jones failed to file a

timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
3

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated August 15, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Collegiate Pacific Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Collegiate Pacific Inc. on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-64471 and File No. 333-34294)
and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-59878).

                                                       /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas


October 28, 2003
§ 71.01-20 Expired certificate. ( a ) Nothing in this subpart shall prevent a vessel upon a regularly established line from a port in the United States to a port of a foreign country not contiguous to the United States whose certificate of inspection expires at sea or while said vessel is in a foreign port or a port of Hawaii from lawfully completing her voyage without the valid certificate of inspection or temporary certificate required by this subpart: *Provided,* That the voyage shall be completed within 30 days after the expiration of the certificate of inspection. No such vessel shall depart if its certificate of inspection will expire within 15 days of the date of sailing.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 124 (Thursday, June 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 35547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds--Termination; GE 
Reinsurance Corporation

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 14 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificate 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named company under 31 
U.S.C. 9305 to quality as acceptable surety on Federal bonds has been 
terminated. The above-named company merged with and into Swiss 
Reinsurance America Corporation effective January 1, 2007. The 
surviving corporation of the merger activity is Swiss Reinsurance 
America Corporation, a New York domiciled corporation. Federal bond-
approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the 
Treasury Department Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision, to 
reflect this change.
    In the event bond-approving officers have questions relating to 
bonds issued by the above-named company that has merged with and into 
Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation, they should contact Swiss 
Reinsurance America Corporation at (914) 828-8184.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: June 15, 2007.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 07-3176 Filed 6-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to
Annual Report of Merriman Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, D. Jonathan Merriman and William J. Febbo, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: April 30, 2013 |                             | 
|-------------------- | --------------------------- | 
|                     |                             | 
|                     | /s/ D. Jonathan Merriman    | 
|                     | D. Jonathan Merriman        | 
|                     | Chief Executive Officer     | 
|                     |                             | 
|                     | /s/ William J. Febbo        | 
|                     | William J. Febbo            | 
|                     | Principal Financial Officer |
EX-10.29.1



 Exhibit 10.29.1 
  

 
 



 
 27 August 2013 

VIA EMAIL 
 Mr.
Terry Hungle 
 Chief Financial Officer 
 Mavenir Systems, Inc.

 1651 N Glenville, Suite 201 
 Richardson, TX 75081 

 

	Re:	Reseller OEM Agreement, dated 28 October 2008 (the “Agreement”) 

 Dear Terry: 

Pursuant to Section 14.1 of the above referenced Agreement, please accept this letter as Cisco Systems, Inc. sixty (60) day written notification to Mavenir
Systems, Inc. to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one year term, through 28 October 2014. 
 If you should have any questions or concerns
regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ Dennis Fiore

	Dennis Fiore
	 Manager, Product Management
 MITG

	Cisco Systems, Inc.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1716

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to assure that the operations of

the Forest Service are free of racial, sexual, and ethnic discrimination,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1995

Mr. HERGER (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. COOLEY, and Mr. INGLIS of

South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to assure that the

operations of the Forest Service are free of racial, sexual,

and ethnic discrimination, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forest Service Em5 ployment Opportunity Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE FOREST

7 SERVICE.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture is

9 directed to take such steps as are necessary to assure that
2

•HR 1716 IH

1 the operations of the Forest Service are free of racial,

2 gender-based, and ethnic discrimination. Such steps shall

3 include—

4 (1) assuring that employment is not offered to

5 persons based on their race, sex, or national origin;

6 (2) assuring that employment is not conditioned

7 on political or ideological commitments;

8 (3) assuring compliance with the requirements

9 of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and

10 (4) such other steps as are necessary to prevent

11 any preferences in employment, contracting, or oth12 erwise, from being extended by the Forest Service on

13 the basis of race, sex, or national origin.

14 (b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date

15 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture

16 shall report to Congress on the steps taken to implement

17 this section, and their effectiveness.

Æ