alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1106

___________ Charles Pointer, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Parents for Fair Share, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 30, 2004 Filed: February 9, 2004

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Pointer brings this pro se appeal challenging the district court's dismissal of his discrimination action against Parents for Fair Share. After allowing Pointer to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), the district court dismissed his complaint prior to service, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court reasoned that the complaint was frivolous because of its similarity to Pointer's previous IFP complaint that had been dismissed as frivolous, and that the claims were barred by the principles of res judicata. Further, the district court certified that an appeal would not be taken-2- in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Pointer appeals. We have reviewed the record de novo, Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), and affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
#### § 5.501 General.

A hearing concerning the suspension or revocation of a merchant mariner's credential or endorsement is a formal adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551, *et seq.*). It is presided over by, and conducted under the exclusive control of, an ALJ in accordance with applicable requirements in the APA, the rules in this part, and the rules of administrative practice at 33 CFR part 20. The ALJ shall regulate and conduct the hearing so as to bring out all the relevant and material facts and to ensure a fair and impartial hearing.

[USCG-1998-3472, 64 FR 28075, May 24, 1999, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11215, Mar. 16, 2009]
#### § 56.50-57 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 287
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

§ 287.7 Circumstances permitting reimbursement from a construction reserve fund. ( a ) *Payments prior to establishment of fund.* If, prior to the establishment of a construction reserve fund under the regulations in this part, a taxpayer has made necessary payments under a contract which satisfies the provisions of the regulations in this part and section 511 of the Act for the construction or acquisition of a new vessel, such taxpayer may, if subsequently authorized to establish a construction reserve fund under the regulations in this part, draw against such fund as reimbursement for the amount, if any, of other funds which, with the approval or ratification of the Administration, the taxpayer used for making such necessary payments prior to the establishment of the fund.
( b ) *Payments subsequent to establishment of fund.* If, subsequent to the establishment of a construction reserve fund under the regulations in this part, the taxpayer has made necessary payments under a contract which satisfies the provisions of the regulations in this part and section 511 of the Act for the construction or acquisition of a new vessel, such taxpayer may draw against such fund as reimbursement for the amount, if any, of other funds which, with the approval or ratification of the Administration, the taxpayer had used for the purpose of making such necessary payments.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 7, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
98-2075.

#### State ex rel. Urban v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

In Prohibition. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 502.102 Enlargement or reduction of time to file documents. ( a ) Motions for enlargement or reduction of time for the filing of any pleading or other document, or in connection with the procedures of subpart L of this part, may be granted upon a showing of good cause. Motions must set forth the reasons for the request and be received at least seven (7) days before the scheduled filing date. Motions filed less than seven (7) days before the scheduled filing date may be considered where reasonable grounds are found for the failure to meet this requirement.
( b ) Motions submitted after the scheduled filing date will be considered a request to accept late filing and must be accompanied by the document. These motions will only be considered when exceptional circumstances are shown or as justice may require.
( c ) Motions and responses to motions filed under this section are subject to the requirements of §§ 502.69 and 502.71, except that responses to motions must be served and filed within five (5) days after the date of service of the motion. [Rule 102.]
DESCRIPTION OF INTERLINK ELECTRONICS, INC.
                 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

     Interlink  Electronics,  Inc. (the  "Company")  currently has one cash
bonus plan  covering the  executive  officers of the  Company.  Performance
objectives  for the Company as a whole are  determined  at the beginning of
each fiscal year during the annual  budgeting  process and are  approved by
the Board of Directors.  These performance objectives are established based
upon  competitive   conditions  and  general  economic  circumstances  then
prevailing in the industries in which the Company does business.

     Eligibility of an executive officer for a bonus is generally dependent
upon the  achievement of the  predetermined  performance  objectives of the
bonus plan.  Target  bonus  amounts  are  established  by the  Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors  (the  "Committee")  for each executive
officer at the  beginning  of each  fiscal  year,  as a  percentage  of the
executive officer's base salary. If the predetermined performance goals are
met, a preliminary bonus amount is calculated under the bonus formula up to
a maximum of the target  bonus  amount.  The final bonus  amount paid to an
eligible  executive  officer  is  determined  by the  Committee,  which has
discretion  to increase  or  decrease  the  formula-derived  figure  within
certain limits based upon the  Committee's  assessment of the  individual's
performance,  and to pay special bonuses in extraordinary  circumstances as
judged by the Committee.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2004                                 /s/ Emile A. Battat
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Emile A. Battat
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


     The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and not for any other purpose.

                                       20
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

|Date: March 14, 2006 |  | /s/ J. BRYAN BAKERJ. Bryan Baker Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

---



QuickLinks
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 13, 2009

|Filer                                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|Army and Air Force Mutual Aid Association | 4c8* 3A1      | Army and Air Force Mutual Aid Association, Ft. Myer, Virginia, and Armed Forces Bank Holding Company, Reston, Virginia, to become bank holding companies through the acquisition of 100% of the voting securities of Armed Forces Bank, National Association, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and Armed Forces Bank of California, National Association, San Diego, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/10/2009
|Newspaper:                                | Not available
|Federal Register:                         | 07/10/2009   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### McIntire, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*Carr.

A writ of error will, in general, be dismissed, when the plaintiff has an ample remedy, by motion at the trial term, for the correction of the error.

*208Writ or Error, to reverse a judgment rendered at the trial term against the plaintiff, as trustee of one R.', in the original action.

*Bingham*Mitchell, for the plaintiff.

*Barr Stevens,*for the defendant.

Smith, J.

According to the practice in this state, a p'arty who is aggrieved by a judgment rendered at the trial term, may at a subsequent term move to bring the action forward, and to vacate or modify the judgment. The remedy thus afforded is simple, expeditious, mexpensive, and, in general, ample. A resort to the cumbersome process of a writ of error is seldom necessary. In this case, if the plaintiff is entitled to any relief, he can have it on a motion to bring the original action forward at the trial term; and for that reason the writ of error is

*Dismissed.*

All concurred.
§ 502.302 Limitations of actions. ( a ) Claims alleging violations of the Shipping Act of 1984 must be filed within three years from the time the cause of action accrues.
( b ) A claim is deemed filed on the date it is received by the Commission. [Rule 302.]
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 64 FR 7812, Feb. 17, 1999]
#### Isaac Levy, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*The People of the State of New York, *Defendant in Error*.

Conviction affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patenable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel HH-91 SEP.                    

*Date:*                         June 27, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel and Executive Meeting Center, Bethesda, MD.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369,                         *igunzera@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 92.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 92.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 11, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2443 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 62.35-40 Fuel systems. ( a ) *Level alarms.* Where high or low fuel tank level alarms are required, they must be located to allow the operator adequate time to prevent an unsafe condition.
( b ) *Coal fuels.* ( 1 ) Controls and instrumentation for coal systems require special consideration by the Commandant.
( 2 ) Interlocks must be provided to ensure a safe transfer of machinery operation from one fuel to another.
( c ) *Automatic fuel heating.* Automatic fuel heating must meet section 4-9-3/15.1 of the ABS Marine Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference; see § 62.05-1).
( d ) *Overflow prevention.* Fuel oil day tanks, settlers, and similar fuel oil service tanks that are filled automatically or by remote control must be provided with a high-level alarm that annunciates in the machinery spaces and either an automatic safety trip control or an overflow arrangement.
[CGD 81-030, 53 FR 17838, May 18, 1988, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50463, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50728, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65190, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49229, Sept. 25, 2009]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

[Date]

[Name and Address of Director Recipient]

Dear [Name]:

This letter is intended to document an award to you of [    ] shares of
restricted TALX Corporation stock granted under the TALX Corporation Outside
Directors' Stock Option Plan by action of the Board of Directors on [Date].

Enclosed you will find a copy of the Plan with Amendment 1 and Amendment 2, and
an Offering Circular prepared for you which summarizes the Plan and your rights
with respect to the stock.

Because the stock vests over several years, we have instructed the Transfer
Agent to make a book entry to indicate your ownership. You will note that you
will receive dividends on the stock, and have the right to vote, and the
Transfer Agent has been so instructed. You will receive a "Form 1099-Div" for
the dividends.

Here are some other things to know about the award:

      -     The shares of stock are restricted and vest ratably over three
            years.

      -     Upon termination of service as a director, unvested shares of stock
            generally are forfeited with certain exceptions, including
            termination of service for death, disability or change of control.

      -     If service as a director is terminated due to death, disability or
            change of control, stock will NOT be forfeited, but will
            automatically vest.

      -     There is an income tax election which is available to grant
            recipients, which would cause tax gain to be realized at the time of
            the grant in exchange for capital gains treatment on later
            appreciation.

Of course, for a more detailed description you can review the Offering Circular
and the Plan. Please call if you have any questions.

                                                               Sincerely,

                                                               Thomas C. Werner
                                                               General Counsel
Exhibit 23 to
                                                                   Form 10-K

                            Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors and Stockholders

A. P. Green Industries, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement (No.
33-21012, 33-35475 and 33-38323) on Form S-8 of A. P. Green Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our report dated February 10, 1997, relating to the consolidated
statements  of  financial   position  of  A.  P.  Green  Industries,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1996 and 1995,  and the related  consolidated
statements  of earnings,  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the
years  in the  three-year  period  ended  December  31,  1996,  and the  related
schedule,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1996 annual  report on Form
10-K of A. P. Green Industries, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method
of accounting for postemployment benefits in 1994.


/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
March 26, 1997
#### William Kelly, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*The People of the State of New York, *Defendants in Error*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion

*Per Guriam.*
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 21


              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                       STATE OF
NAME                 INCORPORATION  DATE OF INCORPORATION    DOING BUSINESS AS
-------------------  -------------  ---------------------  ---------------------
<S>                  <C>            <C>                    <C>
NanoPierce Card      Germany        January 2000           NanoPierce Card
Technologies, GmbH                                         Technologies, GmbH
-------------------  -------------  ---------------------  ---------------------
NanoPierce           Nevada, USA    January 2002           NanoPierce Connection
Connection Systems,                                        Systems, Inc.
Inc.
-------------------  -------------  ---------------------  ---------------------
ExypnoTech, GmbH     Germany        February 2002          ExypnoTech, GmbH
-------------------  -------------  ---------------------  ---------------------
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
#### Martin McCarty, *Respondent, v.*Francis Bogardus, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
#### § 45.125 Crew passageways.

The vessel must have means for protection of the crew from boarding seas such as life lines, gangways, and underdeck passages to facilitate passing between their quarters and machinery spaces and other spaces essential to the operation of the ship.
*Thursday, November 12, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

98-2207.

#### In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Custodian of Records, Wallaby’s, Inc.

This cause is pending before the court on a motion for an order to show cause filed by movant, Ohio State Bar Association. On November 9,1998, respondent, Custodian of Records, Wallaby’s, Inc., filed a response to the motion for order to show cause which was due November 2, 1998. Whereas S.Ct-Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a document after the filing deadline has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that respondent’s response to the motion for order to show cause be, and hereby is stricken.