26258 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP—Continued 

State citation Title/subject 

State 

approval/ 

submittal date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Section 114.315 ............ Approved Test Methods .................. 8/22/12 5/6/13 [Insert FR page number where 

document begins]. 

Section 114.316 ............ Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements.8/22/12 5/6/13 [Insert FR page number where 

document begins]. 

Section 114.317 ............ Exemptions to Low Emission Diesel 

Requirements.

8/22/12 5/6/13 [Insert FR page number where 

document begins]. 

Section 114.318 ............ Alternative Emission Reduction 

Plan.

8/22/12 5/6/13 [Insert FR page number where 

document begins]. 

Section 114.319 ............ Affected Counties and Compliance 

Dates.

8/22/12 5/6/13 [Insert FR page number where 

document begins]. 

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–10546 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0650; FRL–9809–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Consent Decree Requirements 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an 

adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing 

the March 15, 2013, direct final rule 

approving a revision to the Indiana State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA will 

address the comment in a subsequent 

final action based upon the proposed 

rulemaking action, also published on 

March 15, 2013. EPA will not institute 

a second comment period on this action. 

DATES: The direct final rule published at 

78 FR 16412 on March 15, 2013, is 

withdrawn as of May 6, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam 

Portanova, Environmental Engineer, Air 

Permits Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 

(312) 886–3189, 

portanova.sam@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is 

withdrawing the March 15, 2013 (78 FR 

16412), direct final rule approving a 

revision to Indiana’s construction 

permit rule for sources subject to the 

state operating permit program 

regulations at 40 CFR Part 70. In the 

direct final rule, EPA stated that if 

adverse comments were received by 

April 15, 2013, the rule would be 

withdrawn and not take effect. On 

March 18, 2013, EPA received a 

comment, which it interprets as adverse 

and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the 

direct final rule. EPA will address the 

comment in a subsequent final action 

based upon the proposed rulemaking 

action, also published on March 15, 

2013 (78 FR 16449). EPA will not 

institute a second comment period on 

this action. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Sulfur oxides. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 22, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ Accordingly, the amendment to 40 

CFR 52.770 published in the Federal 

Register on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 

16412) on page 16414 is withdrawn as 

of May 6, 2013. 

[FR Doc. 2013–10690 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0394; EPA–R05– 

OAR–2012–0786; FRL–9786–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; 

Consumer Products and AIM Rules 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to 

the Illinois State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). This approval resolves the issues 

raised in the June 7, 2012, conditional 

approval of Illinois’ rules. EPA is also 

approving volatile organic compound 

(VOC) content limits and associated 

provisions for additional consumer 

products categories into the state’s SIP. 

Finally, EPA is approving language to 

clarify VOC limit applicability for 

architectural and industrial 

maintenance (AIM) coatings into the 

Illinois SIP. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective July 5, 2013, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by June 5, 

2013. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Nos. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2010–0394, EPA–R05–OAR– 

2012–0786, by one of the following 

methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 26259 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010– 

0394. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Anthony 

Maietta, Environmental Protection 

Specialist, at (312) 353–8777 before 

visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. Background 

II. Contents of Illinois’ Submittal 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

Consumer products encompass a wide 

array of sprays, gels, cleaners, 

adhesives, and other chemically 

formulated products that are purchased 

for personal or institutional use and that 

emit VOCs through their use, 

consumption, storage, disposal, 

destruction, or decomposition. AIM 

coatings are generally paints, varnishes, 

and other similar materials that are 

meant for use on external surfaces of 

buildings, pavements and other outside 

structures. On April 7, 2010, the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(IEPA) submitted a request for EPA to 

approve Part 223 of Title 35 of the 

Illinois Administrative Code (35 IAC 

Part 223), titled, ‘‘Standards and 

limitations for Organic Material 

Emissions for Area Sources’’, into the 

Illinois SIP. On June 7, 2012, EPA 

published a final action approving 

Illinois’ consumer products and AIM 

rules into the State’s SIP (77 FR 33659). 

In our June 7, 2012, rulemaking, we 

conditionally approved portions of 

IEPA’s submittal, based upon the State’s 

September 2, 2011, letter to EPA 

committing to correct the noted 

deficiencies by July 9, 2013. On 

September 14, 2012, IEPA submitted a 

revision to 35 IAC Part 223 correcting 

the paragraphs that EPA conditionally 

approved in our June 7, 2012, action. 

Illinois’ September 14, 2012, 

submittal requested that EPA approve 

VOC limits for additional categories of 

consumer products, as well as a 

compliance deadline and impurities 

provisions for these product categories. 

Illinois’ submittal also requested EPA to 

approve a revision to 35 IAC Part 223 

to clarify applicability of the AIM VOC 

limits. 

II. Contents of Illinois’ Submittal 

As noted above, on June 7, 2012, EPA 

conditionally approved four paragraphs 

of 35 IAC Part 223, noting deficiencies 

in the state rules. The four specific 

provisions containing these deficiencies 

were 35 IAC 223.205(6)(A), 35 IAC 

223.205(6)(B), 35 IAC 223.205(17)(A), 

and 35 IAC 223.205(17)(B). These 

paragraphs displayed incorrectly 

labeled high-volatility and mediumvolatility organic material limits. Based 

on our review of the September 14, 

2012, submittal, IEPA has corrected the 

deficiencies within the prescribed time 

frame. We are converting the 

conditional approval to full approval. 

IEPA also requested that EPA 

approve, into the Illinois SIP, 

adjustments to 35 IAC Part 223, as 

discussed below. 

35 IAC Part 223, ‘‘STANDARDS AND 

LIMITATIONS FOR ORGANIC 

MATERIAL EMISSIONS FOR AREA 

SOURCES’’ 

Subpart B: Consumer and Consumer 

Products 

IEPA added section 223.211 

‘‘Requirements for Adhesive Removers, 

Aerosol Adhesives, Contact Adhesives, 

Electrical Cleaners, Electronic Cleaners, 

Footwear or leather Care Products, 

General Purpose Degreasers, and Graffiti 

Removers’’ to the table of contents of 

Subpart B. The addition is approvable 

into the Illinois SIP. 

35 IAC Part 223.201, ‘‘Applicability’’ 

IEPA added the phrase ‘‘unless 

another date is specified’’ to the 

applicability of 35 IAC Part 223 because 

the new product categories added to this 

rule were added after the rule’s original 

applicability date. The new 

applicability date for the additional 

product categories (July 1, 2012) is 

specified in section 223.305 of the rule. 

This addition is approvable into the 

Illinois SIP. 

35 IAC Part 223.203, ‘‘Definitions for 

Subpart B’’ 

IEPA amended the definition of 

‘‘Existing Product’’ to remove the 

specific applicability date of July 1, 

2009, and added the phrase ‘‘the 

effective date in Section 223.205’’ in its 

place. This is an approvable amendment 

because both the July 1, 2009 (for 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
26260 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

product categories that were affected by 

the rule as approved by EPA at 77 FR 

33659), and July 1, 2012 (for product 

categories affected by IEPA’s latest 

amendments to the rule), effective dates 

are clearly stated in section 223.205 of 

Illinois’ rule. 

IEPA added the definition of ‘‘Vinyl/ 

Fabric/Leather/Polycarbonate Coating’’ 

to this section. The definition is 

consistent with the Ozone Transport 

Commission (OTC) model rule, and 

therefore, is approvable into the Illinois 

SIP. 

Section 223.205, ‘‘Standards’’ 

IEPA requested EPA to approve the 

addition of new product categories, 

VOC limits for the products in these 

categories, and their associated 

applicability date at 35 IAC Part 

223.205. IEPA amended the numeric 

order of the standards list in order to 

incorporate the new product categories. 

Specifically, the new product categories 

added to 35 IAC Part 223.205 (with 

subcategories listed in parenthesis) are: 

—Adhesive Removers (floor or wall 

covering, gasket or thread locking, 

general purpose, and specialty), 

—Anti-static Product, Non-Aerosol 

—Contact Adhesives (general purpose 

and special purpose), 

—Electrical Cleaner, 

—Electronic Cleaner, 

—Fabric Refresher (aerosol and nonaerosol), 

—Footwear or Leather Care Products 

(aerosol, solid, and other forms), 

—Graffiti Remover (aerosol and nonaerosol), 

—Hair Styling Products (aerosol and 

pump sprays, and all other forms), 

—Shaving Gel, and 

—Wood Cleaner (aerosol and nonaerosol). 

The VOC limits for these additional 

consumer products categories are at 

least as stringent as the VOC limits 

contained in EPA’s national consumer 

products rule (‘‘National Volatile 

Organic Compound Emission Limits for 

Consumer Products,’’ 40 CFR 59, 

subpart C), and mirror the VOC limits 

contained in the model consumer 

products rule created by the OTC. 

Therefore, these additions are 

approvable into the Illinois SIP. It 

should be noted that while Illinois is 

not an OTC member state, they have 

voluntarily chosen to adopt these VOC 

limits to create more consistency in 

regional and national markets for 

consumer products. 

Section 223.211, ‘‘Requirements for 

Adhesive Removers, Aerosol 

Adhesives, Contact Adhesives, 

Electrical Cleaners, Electronic Cleaners, 

Footwear or Leather Care Products, 

General Purpose Degreasers, and 

Graffiti Removers’’. 

This new section in Illinois’ rule 

prohibits the sale of the aforementioned 

products after July 1, 2012, if they 

contain methylene chloride, 

perchloroethylene, or trichloroethylene. 

This section also allows for the sale of 

the aforementioned products that may 

contain methylene chloride, 

perchloroethylene, or trichloroethylene, 

but only if the compounds are present 

as impurities in a combined amount 

equal to or less than 0.01 percent by 

weight. This section mirrors the OTC 

model rule, and is therefore approvable 

into the Illinois SIP. 

Subpart C: Architectural and Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings 

Section 223.305, ‘‘Applicability’’ 

IEPA amended paragraph (c) of this 

section to clarify that the volume of 

architectural coating in a container shall 

be considered the total volume of 

coating that is packaged as a unit for 

retail sale or for use by the consumer. 

This revision helps ensure that sellers of 

AIM coatings in Illinois comply with 

the VOC content limits contained in 35 

IAC Part 223. Because this amendment 

makes clear that a seller cannot simply 

sell multiple small containers of an AIM 

coating (where each container contains 

a volume less than the amount that 

would trigger compliance with an AIM 

VOC limit), it strengthens compliance 

with the rule, and is approvable into the 

Illinois SIP. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving a revision to the 

Illinois SIP, converting the June 7, 2012, 

conditional approved to full approval. 

EPA is also approving the requested 

amendments and additions to the 

Illinois SIP at 35 IAC Part 223 contained 

in Illinois’ September 14, 2012, 

submittal. We are publishing this action 

without prior proposal because we view 

this as a noncontroversial amendment 

and anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective July 5, 2013 without further 

notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by June 5, 

2013. If we receive such comments, we 

will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. If we do not receive any 

comments, this action will be effective 

July 5, 2013. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Clean Air Act and 

applicable Federal regulations. 42 

U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, 

in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 26261 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by July 5, 2013. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: February 13, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

§ 52.719 [Removed and reserved] 

■ 2. Remove and reserve § 52.719. 

■ 3. Section 52.720 is amended by 

revising paragraph (c)(191) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.720 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(191) On September 14, 2012, Illinois 

submitted an amendment to its State 

Implementation Plan at 35 Illinois 

Administrative Code Part 223, which 

adds new consumer product categories 

and VOC limits for these products in 

Subpart B, and amends Subpart C to 

clarify applicability. 35 IAC Part 223 

limits the amount of volatile organic 

compounds from consumer products 

and architectural and industrial 

maintenance coatings. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Illinois Administrative Code; Title 

35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle 

B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution 

Control Board; Subchapter c: Emission 

Standards and Limitation for Stationary 

Sources; Part 223: Standards and 

Limitations for Organic material 

Emissions for Area Sources, effective 

May 4, 2012. 

(B) Reserved. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–09301 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 51, 54, and 69 

[WC Docket No. 10–90, CC Docket No. 01– 

92, WC Docket No. 12–63, Transmittal Nos. 

41, 28, and 57; DA 13–564] 

Connect America Fund; Developing a 

Unified Intercarrier Compensation 

Regime 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission’s 

Wireline Competition Bureau clarifies 

and corrects certain provisions of the 

Commission’s rules in response to 

recent petitions and other requests for 

clarification or correction of the new 

rules adopted as part of Universal 

Service Fund intercarrier compensation 

transformation reforms and also grants a 

limited waiver of the Commission’s 

rules to address administrative concerns 

and rule inconsistencies. 

DATES: Effective June 5, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robin Cohn, Wireline Competition 

Bureau, Pricing Policy Division (202) 

418–1520 or (202) 418–0484 (TTY); or 

Christopher S. Koves, Wireline 

Competition Bureau, Pricing Policy 

Division, (202) 418–1520 or (202) 418– 

0484 (TTY). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Wireline Competition 

Bureau’s Order in WC Docket No. 10– 

90, CC Docket No. 01–92, WC Docket 

No. 12–63, Transmittal Nos. 41, 28, and 

57, DA 13–564, adopted and released on 

March 27, 2013. The full text of this 

document is available electronically via 

ECFS at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/or 

may be downloaded at http:// 

hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/ 

attachmatch/DA-13-564A1.pdf. The full 

text of this document is also available 

for public inspection during regular 

business hours in the FCC Reference 

Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY– 

A257, Washington, DC 20554. The 

complete text may be purchased from 

the Commission’s copy contractor, Best 

Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, (202) 488–5300 

(voice) or (202) 488–5563 (facsimile) or 

via email at fcc@bcpiweb.com. To 

request materials in accessible formats 

for people with disabilities (e.g. braille, 

large print, electronic files, audio 

format, etc.) or to request reasonable 

accommodations (e.g. accessible format 

documents, sign language interpreters, 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES