alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014202EN.01000401.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Bolloré v European Commission

(Case C-414/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Cartels - Market in carbonless paper - Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary - Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement - Equal treatment - Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings - Reasonable period of time - Rights of the defence))

2014/C 202/04

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Bolloré (represented by: P. Gassenbach, C. Lemaire and O. de Juvigny, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and N. Coutrelis, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012 in Case T-372/10 Bolloré v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment or amendment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4160 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFUE and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/36.212 — Carbonless paper) — Decision taken following annulment of a first decision — Attribution of liability for the infringement to the parent company as direct perpetrator — Fine — Lawfulness of infringements and penalties — Equal treatment — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence

Bolloré

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Bolloré to pay the costs of the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bolloré to pay the costs of the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
§ 555.8 Action against foreign carriers. ( a ) Whenever, after notice and opportunity for comment or hearing, the Commission determines that the conditions specified in § 555.3 of this part exist, the Commission shall take such action as it considers necessary and appropriate against any foreign carrier which it identifies as a contributing cause to, or whose government is a contributing cause to, such conditions, in order to offset such conditions. Such action may include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Limitations on sailings to and from United States ports or on the amount or type of cargo carried;
( 2 ) Suspension, in whole or in part, of any or all tariffs or service contracts, including the right of an ocean common carrier to use any or all tariffs or service contracts of conferences in United States trades of which it is a member for such period as the Commission specifies;
( 3 ) Suspension, in whole or in part, of the right of an ocean common carrier to operate under any agreement filed with the Commission, including agreements authorizing preferential treatment at terminals, preferential terminal leases, space chartering, or pooling of cargo or revenues with other ocean common carriers;
( 4 ) Imposition of a charge, not to exceed $1,000,000 per voyage;
( 5 ) A request to the collector of customs at any port or place of destination in the United States to refuse the clearance required by section 4197 of the Revised Statutes(46 U.S.C. 60105), to any vessel of a foreign carrier that is identified by the Commission under this section;
( 6 ) A request to the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating to deny entry, for purposes of oceanborne trade, of any vessel of a foreign carrier that is identified by the Commission under this section to any port or place in the United States or the navigable waters of the United States, or to detain any such vessel at the port or place in the United States from which it is about to depart for any other port or place in the United States; and
( 7 ) Any other action the Commission finds necessary and appropriate to address adverse foreign shipping practices as described in § 555.3 of this part.
( b ) The Commission may consult with, seek the cooperation of, or make recommendations to other appropriate U.S. Government agencies prior to taking any action under this action.
( c ) Before any action against foreign carriers under this section becomes effective or a request under this section is made, the Commission's determination as to adverse conditions and its proposed actions and/or requests shall be submitted immediately to the President. Such actions will not become effective nor requests made if, within 10 days of receipt of the Commission's determination and proposal, the President disapproves it in writing, setting forth the reasons for the disapproval, if the President finds that disapproval is required for reasons of the national defense or the foreign policy of the United States.
[54 FR 11533, Mar. 21, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 8010, Feb. 18, 1999; 67 FR 39862, June 11, 2002; 74 FR 50733, Oct. 1, 2009]
#### Sides *v.*Portsmouth.

If a railroad, having the right to cross a highway, does not leave it reasonably safe, and a person is injured thereby, the town may be held liable.

Case, for damage to a traveller caused by a defective highway. The alleged defect was a hole at a railroad crossing. The defendant excepted to the refusal of the court to instruct the jury that it is not answerable for the mode of construction or condition of the railroad. Verdict for the plaintiff.

*Foster*and *Hatch,*for the defendant.

*Page*and *Frink,*for the plaintiff.

Bingham, J.

If a railroad company, acting under their charter, create an obstruction in a highway by which a traveller sustains damage, the town is ánswerable as if the same acts had been done by an individual. *Willey*v. *Portsmouth,*35 N. H. 313; *Elliot*v. *Concord,*27 N. H. *204; State*v. *Dover,*46 N. H. 452; *Bacon*v. *Boston,*3 Cush. 179; *Eyler*v. *Co. Com'rs,*49 Md. 257; *Watson*v. *Tripp,*11 R. I. 98.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

LYNDA LYNCH 

 Case No. 15-cv-12461 

 Plaintiff, Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

DEVON FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER APPROVING LAWSUIT RESOLUTION (ECF #22)

 On July 10, 2015, Plaintiff Lynda Lynch brought an action against 

Defendant Devon Facility Management, LLC, alleging violations of the Fair Labor 

Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (See Compl., ECF #1 at ¶ 27, Pg. 

ID 5.) On April 13, 2016, the Court entered an Order permitting the parties to file 

a proposed resolution of this lawsuit under seal for in camera review. (See ECF 

#21.) 

On April 14, 2016, the parties submitted a proposed resolution (the 

“Resolution”). (ECF #22.) To approve the Resolution, the Court must determine 

that the compromise is a fair, reasonable, and adequate resolution of a bona fide 

FLSA dispute. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 

2:15-cv-12461-MFL-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 04/15/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 98
2 

(11th Cir. 1982); see also Williams v. K&K Assisted Living, LLC, 2016 WL 

319596, at *1-2 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2016). 

 The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed Resolution of this action and 

finds that the Resolution reached by the parties is fair, reasonable, and adequate. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Resolution (ECF #22) is 

APPROVED. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 15, 2016 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on April 15, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113

 

2:15-cv-12461-MFL-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 04/15/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 99
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cr-20351

Hon. Sean F. Cox 

vs. 

U.S. District Court Judge 

D-04 – HATEM ATAYA, 

Defendant. 

STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS 

NOW COME current Co-Counsel for Defendant Hatem Ataya, Stephan A. Manko, and 

Substitute Counsel for Defendant Hatem Ataya, James W. Burdick, who hereby stipulate and 

agree to the substitution of James W. Burdick in the place and stead of Mr. Manko in this matter, 

and seek the Court’s approval of same. 

Respectfully submitted by: 

Stephan A. Manko Burdick Law, P.C. 

 /s/ Stephan A. Manko /s/ James W. Burdick 

Stephan A. Manko (P-49207) James W. Burdick (P-11397) 

Co-Counsel for Defendant Substitute Counsel for Defendant 

132 West Nepessing Street 1760 South Telegraph Road, Suite 300 

Lapeer, MI 48446 Ph: (248) 335-5000

(810) 664-6400 jwb@jwburdicklaw.com 

steve@sharkeylawbuilding.com 

Dated: July 20, 2015 

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 75 Filed 07/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 177
Page 2 of 2

Upon a reading and review of the above Stipulation, and this Court being fully advised in 

the premises, it is hereby Ordered that James W. Burdick be substituted in the place of Stephan 

Manko. 

So Ordered. 

Dated: July 21, 2015 s/ Sean F. Cox 

 Sean F. Cox 

 U. S. District Judge 

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 75 Filed 07/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 178
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

A.M.P., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-22 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 17, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michael J. Scionti, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Rachel Roebuck, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2470 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2470

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 19190 Cochran Boulevard FRNT in Port Charlotte, Florida, as the 
      ``Lieutenant Commander Roy H. Boehm Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COMMANDER ROY H. BOEHM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 19190 Cochran Boulevard FRNT in Port Charlotte, Florida, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Lieutenant Commander Roy H. 
Boehm Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Commander Roy H. Boehm Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2470

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 19190 Cochran Boulevard FRNT in Port Charlotte, Florida, as the 
      ``Lieutenant Commander Roy H. Boehm Post Office Building''.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 13, 2007

|Filer                                | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------------ | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ATB MANAGEMENT, LLC                  | * 3A1          | ATB Management, LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, to become a bank holding company by acquiring control of ATB Holdings, LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, and indirectly aquiring control of  Alabama Trust Bank, N.A., Sylacauga, Alabama. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/12/2007 
|Newspaper:                           | Not available 
|Federal Register:                    | 02/12/2007    
|FIRST CITIZENS FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A1          | First Citizens Financial Corporation, Dawsonville, Georgia, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of First Citizens Bank of Georgia, Dawsonville, Georgia (in organization).   | Newspaper:01/29/2007Federal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                           | 01/29/2007    
|Federal Register:                    | Not available 
|FIRST COMMERCIAL BANK OF FLORIDA     | * Branch       | First Commercial Bank of Florida, Orlando, Florida, to establish a branch located at 800 Deltona Boulevard, Deltona, Florida, to be known as the West Volusia Office.                                                        | Newspaper:01/19/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                           | 01/19/2007    
|Federal Register:                    | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



eVentures Group, Inc.
Jersey City, New Jersey


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the respective
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43032) of our report dated
September 1, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements of eVentures
Group, Inc. (the "Company") appearing in the Company's Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2000. We also consent to the reference to us under the caption
"Experts" in the Re-offer Prospectus.





/s/  BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

     BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



New York, New York
September 27, 2000
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending January 17, 2009

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|MANHATTAN BANKING CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Manhattan Banking Corporation, Manhattan, Kansas, to retain 5.380973 percent of the voting shares of Sonoran Bank, National Association, Phoenix, Arizona.      | Newspaper:01/15/2009Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | 01/15/2009   
|Federal Register:             | Not available
|MANHATTAN BANKING CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Manhattan Banking Corporation, Manhattan, Kansas, to retain 5.122296 percent of the voting shares of BOTS, Inc., parent of Vision Bank, both in Topeka, Kansas. | Newspaper:01/15/2009Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | 01/15/2009   
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”),
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W.
Hempstead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ David
W. Hempstead


David W.
Hempstead


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer


March 30,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 67.255 Restrictions on filing and recording.

A notice of claim of lien is not entitled to filing and recording unless the vessel against which the lien is claimed is covered by a preferred mortgage filed or recorded in accordance with subpart Q of this part or predecessor regulations thereto and which is outstanding at the time the lien is filed and recorded.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, ZEB1 OSR-D M1 Training Grants 
Review.
    Date: February 27, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: John Hayes, Scientific Review Administrator, 
6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 959, Democracy Two, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 451-3398, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e060f170b1d042e030f07024000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ef878e968a9c85af828e8683c1818687c1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.
David Clary,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-238 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 404.106 Ratemaking step 6: Project needed revenue.

The Director calculates each pilotage association's base projected needed revenue by adding the projected adjusted operating expenses from § 404.102 of this part, the total target pilot compensation from § 404.104 of this part, and the projected working capital fund from § 404.105 of this part.

[USCG-2015-0497, 81 FR 11941, Mar. 7, 2016, as amended by USCG-2019-0736, 85 FR 20120, Apr. 9, 2020]
#### § 163.003-3 ASTM standard.

The following standard of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is incorporated by reference into this subpart: ASTM D 1435-94, Standard Practice for Outdoor Weathering of Plastics. You may obtain this standard from the Society at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

[USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67185, Dec. 1, 1999]