alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1643

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory

products of Bulgaria.treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1643

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Bulgaria.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND SUPPLE4 MENTAL ACTION.

5 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds

6 that Bulgaria—
2

•HR 1643 EH

1 (1) has received most-favored-nation treatment

2 since 1991 and has been found to be in full compli3 ance with the freedom of emigration requirements

4 under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 since 1993;

5 (2) has reversed many years of Communist dic6 tatorship and instituted a constitutional republic

7 ruled by a democratically elected government as well

8 as basic market-oriented reforms, including privat9 ization;

10 (3) is in the process of acceding to the General

11 Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the

12 World Trade Organization (WTO), and extension of

13 unconditional most-favored-nation treatment would

14 enable the United States to avail itself of all rights

15 under the GATT and the WTO with respect to Bul16 garia; and

17 (4) has demonstrated a strong desire to build

18 friendly relationships and to cooperate fully with the

19 United States on trade matters.

20 (b) SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION.—The Congress notes

21 that the United States Trade Representative intends to

22 negotiate with Bulgaria in order to preserve the commit23 ments of that country under the bilateral commercial

24 agreement in effect between that country and the United

25 States that are consistent with the GATT and the WTO.
3

•HR 1643 EH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF

2 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO BULGARIA.

3 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN4 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith5 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974

6 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

7 (1) determine that such title should no longer

8 apply to Bulgaria; and

9 (2) after making a determination under para10 graph (1) with respect to Bulgaria, proclaim the ex11 tension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most12 favored-nation treatment) to the products of that

13 country.

14 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

15 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub16 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod17 ucts of Bulgaria, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall

18 cease to apply to that country.

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
August 6, 2015

The Honorable Gina McCarthy The Honorable Mark R. Rosekind, PHD Environmental Protection Agency National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20460 Washington, DC 20590

RE: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Stand ards for Medium

- and Heavy

- Du t y Engines and Vehicles

- Phase 2 Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2014

- 0827 & NHTSA

- 2014

- 0132

As a c ounty

- wide elected official in one of the largest counties in the nation, I strongly support the EPA’s proposal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from heavy

- duty trucks. The trucking industry is a vital aspect of our economy and crucial to the work done by local governments. My office uses heavy

- duty trucks to deliver and retrieve election equipment and materials to nearly 1,700 locations each elect ion cycle . I want these trucks to be as e fficient as possible both because more efficient trucks save taxpayer dollars
, and also because I want our government to be working aggressively to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are driving climate change

. As a government official I have already seen the way that climate c hange will strain government resources and create economic instability. Due to heavy flooding in 2013 , Cook County and 98 Illinois
towns and the Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago were sued by Illinois Farmer’s Insu rance Company for failing to properly update their infrastructure to mitigate the increase in heavy downpours that are a result of climate change. While these lawsuit s were eventually dropped, this is just one example of the way climate change will exacer bate local government’s ability to find enough money to meet their communities’ needs

. Norfolk Virginia is already s truggling with coastal flooding ; Alaska is engulfed in forest fires ; California is struggling to find enough water to keep the state moving forward

. Government has a role in helping these co mmunities endure and rebuild; government also has a responsibility to help limit the greenhouse gases that are driving these problems.
Fortunately, transitioning to a less carbon intensive economy has re a l economic benefits and this proposal is a perfect example. Creating more fuel efficient trucks will save money over the long haul as the upfront cost s of building better trucks will be quickly recouped by a reduction in fuel costs. In the end we will have a more competitive trucking industry, a cleaner environment and a less expensive election process in Cook County.
Sincerely.

David Orr Cook County Clerk
# C_2014085EN.01000801.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck — Austria) — Siegfried Pohl v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG

(Case C-429/12) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 45 TFEU - Directive 2000/78/EC - Difference in treatment on grounds of age - Determination of the reference date for the purposes of advancement on the salary scale - Limitation period - Principle of effectiveness)

2014/C 85/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Siegfried Pohl

Applicant:

Defendant: ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck — Interpretation of Article 6(3) TEU, Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 45 TFEU and Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — Temporal scope — Period before accession — Remuneration of employees in the rail transport sector — National legislation and collective agreement excluding the taking into account of periods of employment completed before reaching the age of 18 for the purpose of determining remuneration — Taking into account of half of the employee’s periods of employment completed after reaching the age of 18, except in the case of professional experience acquired with a ‘quasi-public’ national undertaking or with the national railway company — Limitation period.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

European Union law, and, in particular, the principle of effectiveness, does not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, making the right of an employee to seek a reassessment of the periods of service which must be taken into account in order to fix the reference date for the purposes of advancement subject to a 30-year limitation period, which starts to run from the conclusion of the agreement on the basis of which that reference date was fixed or from the classification in an incorrect salary scale.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.

1

---
§ 58.60-1 Applicability. This subpart applies to the following industrial systems on board a mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU): ( a ) Cementing systems.
( b ) Circulation systems, including— ( 1 ) Pipes and pumps for mud;
( 2 ) Shale shakers;
( 3 ) Desanders; and
( 4 ) Degassers.
( c ) Blow out preventor control systems.
( d ) Riser and guideline tensioning systems.
( e ) Motion compensation systems.
( f ) Bulk material storage and handling systems.
( g ) Other pressurized systems designed for the MODU's industrial operations.
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hood, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the final condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    David D. HoodName:

David D. HoodTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer





November 14, 2002
PMN – R-9010 Environmental Exposure Summary

1 | Page Introduction The is submitting a PMN for a

Environmental Releases from Manufacturing

Refer to the Attachment A for information on en vironmental releases from the manufacturing of

the PMN substance.

EPIWIN Model

An EPIWIN model run has been conducted on the PMN chemical. used.

E-FAST Model

An E-FAST Model run was conducted on the PMN R-9010.

Biodegradation of PMN Substance The substance was tested for biodegradab ility using Test Method ASTM D5271-02.

Conclusion

PMN R-9010
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Kabani and Company****Certified Public Accountant****8700 Warner Avenue, Suite 280****Fountain Valley, CA 92708****(714) 849-1543**

Hamid Kabani,   C.P.A.

**Independent Auditor’s Consent**

To the Board of DirectorsVPN Communications Corporation

             I consent to the use of my report dated January 12, 2001 of the financial statements of VPN Communications Corporation, at September 30, 2000 and1999, in the filing of the 10-KSB, and the reference made to me therein.

|                                                                     |   |               |  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|--|
| /s/ KABANI & COMPANY                                            |   |     |  |
|   Fountain Valley, CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2001   |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 10, 2008

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|LANDMARK BANCORP INC | * 18C* 3A1  | Landmark Bancorp, Inc., Pittston,PA, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Landmark Community Bank, Pittston, PA. | Newspaper:05/28/2008Federal Register:06/06/2008
|Newspaper:           | 05/28/2008 
|Federal Register:    | 06/06/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
115 STAT. 24 PUBLIC LAW 107–13—JUNE 3, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 581:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–35 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

May 9, considered and passed House.

May 24, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–13

107th Congress An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to

use funds appropriated for wildland fire management in the Department of the

Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, to reimburse the United

States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to

facilitate the interagency cooperation required under the Endangered Species

Act of 1973 in connection with wildland fire management.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT FUNDS TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE WITH ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS.

The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture

may use funds appropriated for wildland fire management in the

Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations

Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–291; 114 Stat. 922), to reimburse the

United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine

Fisheries Service for the costs of carrying out their responsibilities

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et

seq.) to consult and conference, as required by section 7 of such

Act (16 U.S.C. 1536), in connection with wildland fire management

activities.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS; REQUIREMENT REGARDING NOTICE.

(a) PURCHASE OF AMERICAN-MADE EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS.—In the case of any equipment or products that may be

authorized to be purchased using funds provided under section

1, it is the sense of the Congress that entities receiving the funds

should, in expending the funds, purchase only American-made

equipment and products.

(b) NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS OF FUNDS.—In expending funds provided under section 1, the head of each Federal agency receiving

such funds shall provide to each recipient of the funds a notice

describing the statement made in subsection (a) by the Congress.

(c) NOTICE OF REPORT.—Any entity which receives funds under

section 1 shall report any expenditures on foreign-made items to

the Congress within 180 days of the expenditure.

Approved June 3, 2001.

Deadline.

June 3, 2001

[H.R. 581]
#### Douglass Boardman, *as Surviving Executor, etc., Respondent, v.*Edward Evans and another *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed on opinion of

Barker, J.,

at Special Term ;

Barker, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Relating to a Periodic Report
Containing Financial Statements

I, William J. Reuter, Chief Executive Officer, and Drew K. Hostetter, Chief Financial Officer, of
Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, based on our knowledge:

(1) The Companys periodic report
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q/A) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: As of March 21, 2006



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        | 
|/s/ William J. Reuter   |  | /s/ Drew K. Hostetter  
|William J. Reuter       |  | Drew K. Hostetter
#### ESTHER LEWIS, RESPONDENT, v. M. *&*V. MOTOR COMPANY AND ANTHONY MANZO, APPELLANTS. FRANKLIN LEWIS, RESPONDENT, v. M. & V. MOTOR COMPANY AND ANTHONY MANZO, APPELLANTS.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided July 3, 1929.

Before Justices Tkenchaed, Kalisch and Lloyd.

For the appellants, *Donohue & O’Brien.*

For the respondents, *Addison P. Rosenlcrans.*

Pee Cueiam.

These were automobile accident cases in which verdicts were awarded to the plaintiff Esther Lewis for personal injuries, and to her husband, Franklin Lewis, for loss of services and expense of curing her. The accident happened about eight-fifteen on the evening of October 21st, 1921', and was caused by the automobile driven by Franklin Lewis colliding with a bus of the defendant. Motions were made for direction of a verdict and refused. The defendant Manzo alone appeals, setting forth as ground for reversal that the court should have found for the defendants.

We think the cases, tried without a jury, presented questions of fact for the trial judge. The plaintiffs’ evidence showed that they were proceeding on their proper side of the road at approximately thirty miles an hour, and suddenly *639came upon the unlightecl remains of the defendant’s burned bus. The car collided with it, caught lire and was in turn destroyed. Both plaintiffs were injured.

The evidence of the defendant Manzo was that the bus caught fire about six-thirty o’clock in the evening; that he left it on the road to get a wrecking car; that he got back just about the time of the accident and that the bus was then still burning.

These conflicting proofs simpty raised an issue of fact for the trial judge. From these he could conclude that at the time of the accident the fire had gone out and that it was negligent for the driver to have left the burning bus without guard or light, knowing that when the fire ceased burning the bus would remain a menace to other users of the highway.

Whether the plaintiffs were guilty of negligence presented a fact question as to the plaintiff Franklin Lewis, and possibly as to Mrs. Lewis. Certainly the court could not say, as matter of law, that such negligence existed.

The judgments are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Aura Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K  (including Amendment No. 1) for the annual period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Melvin Gagerman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge:

|   |                                                                                                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |                                                                                                                  |

 

| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           |

 

|               |                                                                                                                                |               |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|               |                                                                                                                                |
|               |                                                                                                                                |               |
| Date: May 21, 2009 | By:                                                                                                                       | /s/Melvin Gagerman |
|               |  

Melvin GagermanChief Executive Officer, Chief

Financial Officer, Chief Accounting

Officer

 

 

 

  |
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Appellant,*for the Appointment of Commissioners to Examine the Proposed Route of the New York, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, in the Town of Erwin, *Respondents.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
§ 68.29 Citizenship requirements for limited coastwise endorsement. ( a ) Notwithstanding the citizenship requirements set out in part 67 of this chapter, a Certificate of Documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the limited purposes provided in § 68.33 may be issued to a vessel owned by— ( 1 ) A not-for-profit oil spill response cooperative if the vessel meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) A member or members of a not-for-profit oil spill response cooperative if the vessel meets the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) The vessel must be at least 50 percent owned by one or more of the following entities: ( 1 ) An individual who is a native-born, naturalized or derivative citizen of the United States or otherwise qualifies as a United States citizen.
( 2 ) A corporation incorporated under the laws of the United States or of a State where— ( i ) The president and, if the president is not the chief executive officer, the chief executive officer, by whatever title, is a citizen;
( ii ) The chairman of the board of directors is a citizen; and
( iii ) No more of the directors are non-citizens than a minority of the number necessary to constitute a quorum.
( 3 ) A partnership where all the general partners are citizens and at least 50 percent of the equity interest is owned by citizens.
( 4 ) An association or joint venture where all the members are citizens.
( 5 ) A trust where all the trustees and all the beneficiaries with an enforceable interest in the trust are citizens.
( c ) The vessel must be owned by a member or members of a not-for-profit oil spill response cooperative who dedicate the vessel to the use of a not-for-profit oil spill response cooperative.
( d ) A vessel which meets the criteria of this section is considered to be owned exclusively by citizens of the United States for the purposes of subsequent transfer and documentation under part 67 of this chapter.
[CGD 90-055, 57 FR 7642, Mar. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2005-20258, 71 FR 61418, Oct. 18, 2006]
Searched for **https://www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/docs/wp-solutions/2009-123_sp/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/docs/wp-solutions/2009-123_sp/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.