alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ei 

U.S. Department of 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Transportation Washington, DC 20590 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF lATA AGREEMENT(S) 

This serves as official notice of the Department's approval and grant of antitrust immunity to the 

docketed lATA agreement(s) listed below^ during the weekly period ending January 28, 2011. 

Approval of any individual lATA agreement is subject, where applicable, to any conditions 

previously imposed by the Department. 

DOCKET NUMBER DATE FILED DATE APPROVED 

OST-2011-0014 01/25/11 01/28/11 

U.S. and Foreign Agreement 

Action taken by: 

Paul L. Gretch 

Director, Office of International Aviation 

by authority assigned imder 14 CFR 385 

An electronic version of this document is available 

on the World Wide Web at 

http://dms.dot.gOv//reports/reports_aviation.asp
2:15-cr-20311-PDB-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 344
2:15-cr-20311-PDB-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 2 of 6 Pg ID 345
2:15-cr-20311-PDB-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 3 of 6 Pg ID 346
2:15-cr-20311-PDB-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 4 of 6 Pg ID 347
2:15-cr-20311-PDB-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 5 of 6 Pg ID 348
2:15-cr-20311-PDB-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 6 of 6 Pg ID 349
#### § 78.47-5 General alarm contact makers.

Each general alarm contact maker must be marked in accordance with the requirements in subchapter J (Electrical Engineering Regulations) of this chapter.

[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15232, Apr. 4, 1982]
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 26, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00563-CV

D & R ENTERPRISE, INC., Appellant

V.

SCF RC FUNDING IV, LLC; ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY 

TRUST, LLC (A/K/A) SCF REALTY CAPITAL LLC AND MESA 

FORTUNE, INC.; US ASSETS ACQUISITIONS, LLC D/B/A US ASSETS, 

LLC; US ASSETS, INC.; JEFFEREY LOVE A/K/A JEFF LOVE; DAVID 

FETTNER; AND GREG SEIBERT, Appellees

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-47415

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from three interlocutory orders signed June 24, 2022; June 28, 

2022; and July 13, 2022 respectively dismissing claims pleaded against appellee 

David Fettner, denying a request to dismiss affirmative defenses pled by David 

Fettner; and denying reconsideration of the first two orders. No final judgment is in 
2

the appellate record, and the interlocutory orders lack any apparent basis for being 

immediately appealable. Although the record reflects appellant sought permission 

from the trial court to take an immediate interlocutory appeal from those three orders 

pursuant to Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 51.014(d) and Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 28.3, there is no written order in the record in which the trial 

court grants permission for any such appeal. Such an order is required for this court 

to be able to exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. See Hebert v. JJT Constr., 438 

S.W.3d 139, 142 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.).

On January 9, 2023, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was 

subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction unless any party 

demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). The parties 

filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1673

To achieve budgetary savings by terminating certain Department of Defense

programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1995

Ms. FURSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on National Security

A BILL

To achieve budgetary savings by terminating certain

Department of Defense programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF

4 DEFENSE PROGRAMS.

5 No funds may be appropriated to the Department of

6 Defense for any fiscal year after fiscal year 1995 for re7 search, development, test, and evaluation, for procurement

8 or for military construction for any of the following pro9 grams:

10 (1) The Army Comanche helicopter program.
2

•HR 1673 IH

1 (2) The Navy F/A–18E/F fighter and attack

2 aircraft program.

3 (3) The Navy New Attack Submarine program.

4 (4) The Marine Corps V–22 Osprey aircraft

5 program.

6 (5) The Air Force F–22 fighter aircraft pro7 gram.

8 (6) The MILSTAR communications satellite

9 program.

10 (7) Any ballistic missile defense program car11 ried out through the Ballistic Missile Defense Orga12 nization (or any successor organization within the

13 Office of the Secretary of Defense).

Æ
Description Of Registrant's Director Compensation Arrangement



 Exhibit 10.15 
  
 Description of Director Compensation Arrangement 
  
 Members of the Board of Directors of SWS Group, Inc. who are non-employee directors, other than the Chairman of the Board, receive an annual
retainer of $17,000 paid on a quarterly basis, $1,000 for attendance at each regular quarterly Board meeting and $500 for attendance at each special Board meeting and committee meeting. Committee chairmen receive $750 per committee meeting. The
Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $145,000 paid on a biweekly basis and other compensation, aggregating approximately $15,000 per year, which includes the use of a car and club membership dues. SWS Group, Inc. also reimburses
directors for expenses relating to attendance at meetings. Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive grants under the SWS Group, Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Plan. Employee directors of SWS Group, Inc. receive no additional compensation for
serving as directors.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II,
      L.P.
      (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman Historic
      Corporation, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.









/s/
      Richard Paul
      Richman


Richard
      Paul Richman


Chief
      Executive Officer of Wilder


Richman
      Historic Corporation,


General
      Partner of the Registrant


June
      22,
      2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                               <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0                       0
<PP&E>                                      0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  59,899                       0
<BONDS>                                     0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0                       0
<COMMON>                               16,278                       0
<OTHER-SE>                            (76,177)                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                0                       0
<SALES>                                     0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0                       0
<CGS>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,746                   1,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,746)                 (1,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                       0
<CHANGES>                                   0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,746)                 (1,746)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.00)                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.00)                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
#### George W. McNish *v.*Carrie A. Bowers.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
§ 385.61 Grant and cooperative agreements: Special provisions. ( a ) MarAd has adopted two format matrices, one for grant agreements and one for cooperative agreements, to accommodate the variables inherent in undertaking a project with a particular recipient. These variables include, for example, identity of the recipient, scope of work, schedule of performance and obligations assumed by both parties.
( b ) The format matrices are available on request from the Awards Officer, and a copy of each is included in the information kit provided to all potential recipients of financial assistance.[1]
( c ) MarAd will adapt the appropriate format matrix to the extent deemed necessary when drafting the particular agreement to be executed by MarAd and a recipient of financial assistance for a specific project.
Footnotes -
385.61
[1] An informational copy of both format matrices accompany this regulation as filed in the Office of the Federal Register.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT ANDERSON,

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-11727

Plaintiff,

 DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID M. LAWSON

v.

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN

KEVIN ALLEN JUTZY, M.D.,

RAUL TUMADA, P.A., BADAWI

ABELLATIF, M.D., and ANGELA

VATRINO,

Defendants.

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

Plaintiff, a pro se prison inmate, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §

1983. Before the Court is his motion to appoint counsel [Doc. #46].

Unlike criminal cases, there is no constitutional or statutory right to the appointment

of counsel in civil cases. Rather, the Court requests members of the bar to assist in 

appropriate cases. In Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-606 (6 Cir. 1993), the Sixth th

Circuit noted that “[a]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is not a constitutional right. It is

a privilege that is justified only by exceptional circumstances.” (Internal quotations and

citations omitted).

-1-

Case 2:15-cv-11727-DML-RSW ECF No. 57, PageID.364 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 2
In this case, all Defendants except Kevin Allen Jutzy (who has not been served) have

been dismissed, and as to Dr. Jutzy, I have filed a Report and Recommendation that he be

dismissed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) because he has not been timely served. There is no basis

to appoint pro bono counsel.

Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel [Doc. #46] is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: July 25, 2017

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on July 25, 2017, that I electronically filed the foregoing paper

with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered

electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to non-registered ECF

participants on July 25, 2017.

s/Carolyn Ciesla 

Case Manager to 

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

-2-

Case 2:15-cv-11727-DML-RSW ECF No. 57, PageID.365 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 2
#### § 203.4 Replies.

Within ten (10) days after the date for filing answers, the applicant may file a reply specifically addressed to the issues raised in the answers and to oppose the grant to any petitioner of leave to intervene.
§ 381.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Cargo Preference Act of 1954* means section 901(b) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 U.S.C. 1241(b)).
( b ) *Cargoes subject to the Cargo Preference Act of 1954,* include equipment, material or commodities: ( 1 ) Procured, contracted for or otherwise obtained within or outside the United States for the account of the United States;
( 2 ) Furnished within or outside the United States to or for the account of any foreign nation without provision for reimbursement;
( 3 ) Furnished within or outside the United States for the account of any foreign nation in connection with which the United States advances funds or credits or guarantees the convertability of foreign currencies.
( 4 ) Procured, contracted for, or otherwise obtained within or outside of the United States with advance of funds, loans or guaranties made by or on behalf of the United States.
( c ) *Department or agency having responsibility under the Cargo Preference Act of 1954* means any department or agency of the Federal Government, administering a program that involves the transportation on ocean vessels of cargoes subject to the Cargo Preference Act of 1954. At present, these agencies include: ( 1 ) Department of State.
( 2 ) Department of Agriculture.
( 3 ) Department of Defense.
( 4 ) Post Office Department.
( 5 ) General Services Administration.
( 6 ) Export-Import Bank of the United States.
( 7 ) National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
( 8 ) Inter-American Development Bank.
( 9 ) U.S. Information Agency.
( 10 ) Department of Interior.
( 11 ) Department of Commerce.
( 12 ) Department of Treasury.
( 13 ) Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
( 14 ) Department of Housing and Urban Development.
( 15 ) Department of Transportation.
( 16 ) Atomic Energy Commission.
( 17 ) Tennessee Valley Authority.
( 18 ) Veterans Administration.
( 19 ) Smithsonian Institution.
( 20 ) Library of Congress.
( d ) *Liner parcel* means any cargo, dry or liquid, normally carried under berth terms by common carriers in ocean trades.
(Reorganization Plans No. 21 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1273) and No. 7 of 1961 (75 Stat. 840) as amended by Pub. L. 91-469 (84 Stat. 1036) and Department of Commerce Organization Order 10-8 (38 FR 19707, July 23, 1973))
[G.O. 103, 36 FR 6894, Apr. 10, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 1, 36 FR 10739, June 2, 1971; 36 FR 19367, Oct. 5, 1971; 42 FR 57126; Nov. 1, 1977]
§ 502.94 Petitions—general and fee. ( a ) Except when submitted in connection with a formal proceeding, all claims for relief or other affirmative action by the Commission, including appeals from Commission staff action, except as otherwise provided in this part, must be by written petition, which must state clearly and concisely the petitioner's grounds of interest in the subject matter, the facts relied upon and the relief sought, must cite by appropriate reference the statutory provisions or other authority relied upon for relief, must be served upon all parties named therein, and must conform otherwise to the requirements of subpart H of this part. Responses thereto must conform to the requirements of § 502.67.
( b ) Petitions must be accompanied by remittance of a $450 filing fee. [Rule 94.]
[77 FR 61524, Oct. 10, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 59143, Aug. 29, 2016. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 50294, Oct. 5, 2018; 85 FR 72578, Nov. 13, 2020; 88 FR 16897, Mar. 21, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1574 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1574

  To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude certain bank 
               products from the definition of a deposit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 1995

Mrs. Roukema (for herself, Mr. McCollum, Mr. Vento, and Mr. Kanjorski) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude certain bank 
               products from the definition of a deposit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bank Insurance Fund and Depositor 
Protection Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DEPOSIT.

    Section 3(l)(5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S. C. 
1813(l)(5) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) any liability of an insured depository 
                institution that arises under an annuity contract, the 
                income of which is tax deferred under section 72 of the 
                Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to any liability of an 
insured depository that arises under an annuity contract issued on or 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: September 4, 2008 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Mentor Graphics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: September 4, 2008 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mentor Graphics Corporation and will be retained by Mentor Graphics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 502.224 Separation of functions.

The separation of functions as required by 5 U.S.C. 554(d) shall be observed in proceedings under subparts A to Q inclusive, of this part. [Rule 224.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,916
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     724,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,070
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,274
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               214,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (210,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (210,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (308,858)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (487,092)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.045)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.045)
        

</TABLE>