alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mo. Pb -0397-te

ORIGINAL M A^ tr

MO. iM-iM-nmnq-CR

..NO. lH-|H-OC^\0-C-finECEiVED|N

T i\ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_Ln ~LYve_

r \ c a v JUN102015 L_e>uci cA A^pejoAb

-too fric AbglAcoste,Clerk

hOurVcocvt>x Ov^V\c\ aK "\e>c6

cOt AV\oob\on — ^—

WO. \V7160k

MO, \2>T~7 00"7

Hoss^-xt? OiorAqj/TcxosS FILED IN

* — —COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

THt STML & TEXAS *"*-***

Poo Sc

Kout^oewT* i/ooa

•TVcA—4cgy ipa<°nVs Qeque ^A-i*A
^n>"^ V, W c^£ w(T^ °syv^*^ ^ m>3W w

1
\ <\e^r\\%r\c^Vx\ OK ~AW^ VccrWjS

Puc^o^V \<3 ^€JLC APR. P. kfc.Mco, <*. Cov^plt-Vc- V,eAO^r \Vve^ x~x<XNiVNe:5^> o^v cA\ \^\creitrAeA po.rV\'eS \S» p-cov Idled

~\V'\ ^cWcxn^c- hsSVbWV ^;sWA- l\VW^ cA Vn cA

/a^cAVo^Y Or Cr\^>c\ ^e^<WV'

^bOT^

C-our\^-e\ -£cw AooeWc^Y

-Jq-'CncC^cn-n 3o\^-\5cm-\ — Pro CP£- \'\\\aam

\rxo\ ^o^-ac: WocN.i;^ OOcAVcxgcll
~~TdAf. Q^v CorAcxyVs

\cAA<»,. oC C_o>r\WrA;S

X^Ae.K o\ cxo\\\o-\\\^b) „••-*•*«.*.„.•... oi^V/

Corou^Ab Arac ^e.v\ £,U3 0 „ Aa 0 a A

O^AW-W^ ^ ^Kex> W£cAeA

+o Vv<n^ \WOt \W V\e\ couA AA *vA cbo^i Ws difbexeAio^

^ ^vo^Va a^M-mg evidence eA OcVrcoeoLfs otte nSef,

D.uo .oLA 5J\ tlex.O^.App.l^^ c^A evidence- oA exWneouS

0\Ae,vVb^ A\vA Ai^cAWynV l^jjC^ r\C\fl?r Co Av/.cAM <i>£ \AAaWVo?

DA \;W_ Ac^A^AVx CojcV o^ c^eucAf> err hjVxca VV -U\WA

-ro C\<sA ^^ NWAcxcA e^.A AA oo\ c.Y>oi><2_ \Vs A\t>cjreVvoA Vaui

VoV^S P^re/i 9bs\V\ve. TAe^\^\cjcA\o^ fSuWvcexA £i,;^ct "

d\sj)\\<L V\\b Vc^Anotncxnu cA 9t5&\>o\ii mxAcWx XAe^YAu, rebono^e.

<^ooNo\ o^-A vas\o*\ Ovo^Wv^ UTMAec /\c\\c\<£. 37.07 T.C.C.P ujVvcVx LtJrxM V\oWW. tW Woce&S \o oAxvAc U-^ouwvkeA OcoAuAoxcA

VjxA \\vt V-oo*-WAVv CooA ot o^\^\s fxi- uo\\e.v\\\ AV\\cc\ •\<^ \\<>A \\vo\ \\>fi_ \<r\A ^A^e AA ^0A Cjc*\s»\A£jt- W e~>j iAex\c&

o>\ dxW^eooh o$t<-xN*v»_ vr\ Ou^sWwg, C\.0£yeA\cvA- Y}£jCauSe_Ahe. AAa£. — Vvexjex- *v\cAe_ W d&db\^ ojiAUr \Ws-c. '-^Jc^^ Su^iccaA-<£*/rclencc.« •• /

c> c» »

\X1

to

• *!• <i. a ua t, 2, n> a a, 31 « .t. a. t> 1L^-

r-^ . O <P *<
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, March 14, 1995 (44), Para 44.11 Minor Boundary Adjustments and Park Amendments]
[Page 376]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.44.11  minor boundary adjustments and park amendments

  Mr. HANSEN moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 694) 
entitled the ``Minor Boundary Adjustments and Miscellaneous Park 
Amendments Act of 1995''; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mr. HANSEN and Mr. 
RICHARDSON, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. RICHARDSON demanded that the vote be taken by the yeas and nays, 
which demand was supported by one-fifth of the Members present, so the 
yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 3, 2009

|Filer                           | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|MID AMERICA BANKING CORPORATION | CIC         | Notice by Leon Dale Loveall, individually, and acting in concert with Marlese Loveall, both of Columbia, Missouri, to gain control of Mid America Banking Corporation, Columbia, Missouri. | Newspaper:12/31/2008Federal Register:01/21/2009
|Newspaper:                      | 12/31/2008 
|Federal Register:               | 01/21/2009 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 9, 2006

|Filer                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|1895 MHC              | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by 1895 MHC and 1895 Corp., both of Worcester, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Bay State Savings Bank, Worcester, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1) and 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/05/2007
|Newspaper:            | Not available
|Federal Register:     | 01/05/2007   
|DANVERS BANCORP, INC. | * 3A3         | Danvers Bancorp, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts to acquire BankMalden, A Co-operative Bank, Malden, Massachusetts pursuant to section 3(a)(3) of the BHC Act.                                                                                                                                                                  | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/05/2007
|Newspaper:            | Not available
|Federal Register:     | 01/05/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000701288
<NAME>                        Atrion Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          85
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,487
<PP&E>                                          36,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,167
<BONDS>                                         8,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        342
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,460
<SALES>                                         38,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,487
<CGS>                                           23,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                    589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                  129
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,998
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.93



</TABLE>
§ 45.153 Through-hull piping: General. ( a ) All through-hull pipes required by this subpart must be made of steel or material equivalent to the hull in strength and fatigue resistance.
( b ) All valves used as shell fittings and all shell fittings on which such valves are mounted must be made of steel, or bronze or other ductile material approved by the Commandant.
**Exhibit 4.L**

[LETTERHEAD] 

March 31, 2010 

Bank ofAmerica, N.A., as Agent 

Mail Code: CA5-701-05-19 

1455 Market Street,5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94103 

Attention:Robert J. Rittelmeyer 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time totime, the “Credit Agreement”), dated as of June 1, 2005, among Mentor Graphics Corporation, an Oregon corporation (the “Borrower”), the Banks party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Agent (the“Agent”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this letter have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Credit Agreement. 

Pursuant to Section 2.05 of the Credit Agreement, the Borrower hereby elects, solely upon the occurrence of the Closing Date underthat certain Credit Agreement for a $20 million term loan facility, dated on or about April 6, 2010, by and among Borrower, the Agent, and the other financial institutions party thereto, to reduce the Commitments under the Credit Agreement fromOne Hundred Forty Million Dollars ($140,000,000.00) to One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000.00). 

[Signature Page Follows]

Sincerely,Mentor Graphics Corporation, an Oregon corporationBy: /s/ ETHAN MANUELName: Ethan ManuelTitle: Treasurer
# C_2012217EN.01000603.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/6

---

Action brought on 25 April 2012 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-193/12)

2012/C 217/12

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Simon and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to designate as vulnerable zones a number of zones characterised by the presence of surface and groundwater bodies which are, or may be, affected by excessive nitrate content and/or eutrophication, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) and (4) of and Annex I to Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to designate as vulnerable zones a number of zones characterised by the presence of surface and groundwater bodies which are, or may be, affected by excessive nitrate content and/or eutrophication, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) and (4) of and Annex I to Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, (1)

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission complains that when the defendant carried out a revision of the vulnerable zones in 2007, its designation of those zones was not comprehensive, as it ought to have been under Article 3(1) and (4) of and Annex I to Directive 91/676/EEC.

The Commission complains in particular that the French authorities failed to designate 10 additional vulnerable zones and did not provide any specific information that might justify that omission.

---

(1)  OJ 1991 L 375, p. 1.

1

---
§ 541.6 Contents of invoice. ( a ) *Identifying information.* A demurrage or detention invoice must be accurate and contain sufficient information to enable the billed party to identify the container(s) to which the charges apply and at a minimum must include: ( 1 ) The Bill of Lading number(s);
( 2 ) The container number(s);
( 3 ) For imports, the port(s) of discharge; and
( 4 ) The basis for why the billed party is the proper party of interest and thus liable for the charge.
( b ) *Timing information.* A demurrage or detention invoice must be accurate and contain sufficient information to enable the billed party to identify the relevant time for which the charges apply and the applicable due date for invoiced charges and at a minimum must include: ( 1 ) The invoice date;
( 2 ) The invoice due date;
( 3 ) The allowed free time in days;
( 4 ) The start date of free time;
( 5 ) The end date of free time;
( 6 ) For imports, the container availability date;
( 7 ) For exports, the earliest return date; and
( 8 ) The specific date(s) for which demurrage and/or detention were charged.
( c ) *Rate information.* A demurrage or detention invoice must be accurate and contain sufficient information to enable the billed party to identify the amount due and readily ascertain how that amount was calculated and must include at a minimum: ( 1 ) The total amount due;
( 2 ) The applicable detention or demurrage rule (*e.g.,* the tariff name and rule number, terminal schedule, applicable service contract number and section, or applicable negotiated arrangement) on which the daily rate is based; and
( 3 ) The specific rate or rates per the applicable tariff rule or service contract.
( d ) *Dispute information.* A demurrage or detention invoice must be accurate and contain sufficient information to enable the billed party to readily identify a contact to whom they may direct questions or concerns related to the invoice and understand the process to request fee mitigation, refund, or waiver, and at a minimum must include: ( 1 ) The email, telephone number, or other appropriate contact information for questions or request for fee mitigation, refund, or waiver;
( 2 ) Digital means, such as a URL address, QR code, or digital watermark, that directs the billed party to a publicly accessible website that provides a detailed description of information or documentation that the billed party must provide to successfully request fee mitigation, refund, or waiver; and
( 3 ) Defined timeframes that comply with the billing practices in this part, during which the billed party must request a fee mitigation, refund, or waiver and within which the billing party will resolve such requests.
( e ) *Certifications.* A demurrage or detention invoice must be accurate and contain statements from the billing party that: ( 1 ) The charges are consistent with any of the Federal Maritime Commission's rules related to demurrage and detention, including, but not limited to, this part and 46 CFR 545.5; and
( 2 ) The billing party's performance did not cause or contribute to the underlying invoiced charges.
[89 FR 14363, Feb. 26, 2024]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending January 12, 2008

----

EnforcementSouthern Bank of Commerce, Paragould, Arkansas  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and the Arkansas State Bank Department.					-Announced, January 8, 2008 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: January 17, 2008
#### Hannah E. Hutchins, *Appellant, v.*Orrin B. Hutchins, *Respondent*.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J., and by Learned, P. J., dissenting.
EXHIBIT 99.18

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai, Mineral Reserves and Resources and Governance  Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated March 6, 2015 for the Inkai property; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated February 9, 2015 for the Inkai property,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the
Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement
(No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statements (Nos. 333-181577 and 333-200678) on Form
F-10.

Sincerely,



|                |  |                                                                      
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bryan Soliz
|Name:           |  | Bryan Soliz, P. Geo.                                                 
|Title:          |  | Principal Geologist,
Mineral Resources Management,
Cameco Corporation

Date: March 6, 2015
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending November 22, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2009 (January 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Elias Smith, *as Superintendent, etc., Plaintiff, v.*Hiram W. Brundage and others, *Defendants.*

Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals denied.
§ 56.10-1 Selection and limitations of piping components (replaces 105 through 108). ( a ) Pipe, tubing, pipe joining fittings, and piping system components, must meet material and standard requirements of subpart 56.60 and must meet the certification requirements of part 50 of this subchapter.
( b ) The requirements in this subpart and in subparts 56.15 through 56.25 must be met instead of those in 105 through 108 in ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2); however, certain requirements are marked “reproduced.”
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9978, June 17, 1970; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65175, Oct. 31, 2008]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Koertner, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

May 14,
2009

/s/ WILLIAM A. KOERTNER Chief Executive Officer and President


---