Glen-Gery Corporation

Technical Services / Research

433 South Pottsville Pike

Shoemakersville, PA 19555

(610) 562-3076

Fax: (610) 562-2084

http://www.glengerybrick.com

October 05, 2012

CERTIFIED MAIL NO.: 7008 1140 0004 6638 3858

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Division of Source Testing and Monitoring

400 Market Street

12th Floor Rachael Carson State Office Building

Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468

RE: Stack Testing Results for the Glen-Gery Corporation, York PA Plant

Title V Permit No: 67-05045

York County, Spring Garden Township

To Whom It May Concern,

Per Section D.I condition #004 and Section D.II condition #009 of the Title V Operating 

Permit No: 67-05045, the Glen-Gery Corporations York Plant is required to conduct 

performance testing for particulates, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and opacity 

from its No. 2 Tunnel Kiln (source ID: 102) every five years. The most recent required 

stack testing was conducted on August 30, 2012. Enclosed please find three (3) copies of 

the emission test report prepared by Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Testing was conducted 

while operating source 102 at maximum production level for the Red Matt and 213

products. The Glen-Gery Corporation has reviewed the enclosed report and agrees with 

the following findings.

Pollutant Emission 

Rate/Concentration Permit Limit ComplianceStatus

Hydrogen 

Chloride (HCl) 0.01 lb./ton product 0.26 lb./ton product Compliant

Hydrogen 

Fluoride (HF) 0.035 lb./ton product 0.057 lb./ton product Compliant

Filterable 

Particulate 

Matter (PM)

0.23 lb./ton product 0.42 lb./ton product Compliant

Opacity 0% 0% Compliant
Please contact me at (610) 562-3076 if you have any questions or comments concerning 

this test report.

Sincerely,

Glen-Gery Corporation

Mike Krzyzanowski

Technical Services Manager

Enclosure

cc: Mike Lighty

John Vrobel
Compliance Stack Emission

Test Report

Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and

Hydrofluoric Acid Reduction Efficiency and

Filterable Particulate Matter and Visible

Emissions

Natural Gas-Fired Tunnel Kiln No. 2

(Source ID: 102)

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 and 26A

Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

York, Pennsylvania

Date Conducted: August 30, 2012

Job Number: 120805

Prepared by:

PO Box 41156

Cleveland OH 44141-0156

Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471)

Report Date: September 27, 2012
 Superior Quality

Emission Testing.

 Valid Results

 Guaranteed.

P.O. Box 41156 Cleveland, Ohio 44141

1-800-EPA-AIR1 www.aircomp.com

testing@aircomp.com

September 27, 2012

Mike Krzyzanowski

Director of Research/Development

Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

433 South Pottsville Pike

Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555

Dear Mike:

The following report provides the results of the compliance emission testing conducted on

August 30, 2012. These results are a product of the application of the U.S. EPA Stationary

Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A that were in effect at the

time of this test.

Please mail one copy of this report along with any other supportive process operating data

collected during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover

letter (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome of this test. Additionally,

you may address, preferably in a timetable format, any obligations or implications that might

be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because of the result of this test.

Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about these test results.

On behalf of Air Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the

opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work

with you again on any additional future testing projects.

Sincerely,

Robert J. Lisy, Jr.

Technical Manager
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Source Name: Kiln No. 2

Source ID Number: 102

Control Device: DLA

Sampling Location: Inlet Duct Exhaust Stack

Product Throughput Rate (ton/hr)* 12.81

Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.27 0.15

Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 4.1 0.4

Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) - 0.01

Permit Limit - Hydrogen Chloride (lb/ton-product) - 0.26

Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No) - Yes

Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) - 0.035

Permit Limit - Hydrogen Fluoride (lb/ton-product) - 0.057

Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No) - Yes

Filterable Particulate Matter Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) - 0.23

Permit Limit - Filterable Particulate Matter (lb/ton-product) - 0.42

Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No) - Yes

Maximum Six-Minute Average of Visible Emissions (%-opacity) - 0

Permit Limit - Visible Emissions (%-opacity) - 0

Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No) - Yes

PA DEP Title V Permit No. 67-05045 67-05045

* Production data was supplied by Glen-Gery Corporation personnel.

Test Results Summary

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Table of Contents

Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2

1.1 Summary of Test Program 2

1.2 Key Personnel 2

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 - 4

2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3

2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 3

2.3 Presentation of Results 4

3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 7 - 8

3.1 Process Description and Operation 7

3.2 Control Equipment Description 7

3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 7 - 8

3.4 Process Sampling Location 8

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 12 - 13

4.1 Test Methods 12 - 13

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 13

5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 15

5.1 QA Audits 15

5.2 QA/QC Problems 15

6.0 APPENDIX 19

Production and Process Data

Laboratory Results

Field Data Sheets

Calibrations and Certifications

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Summary of Test Program

Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant, located in York, Pennsylvania, contracted Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

of Cleveland, Ohio, to conduct compliance stack emission testing for their Natural Gas-Fired Tunnel Kiln No.

2 (Source ID: 102). Testing was performed to satisfy the emissions testing requirements pursuant to GlenGery's Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) Operating Permit No. 67-05045 and

the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Brick and Structural Clay

Products Manufacturing, 40 CFR Part 63 - Subpart JJJJJ. The testing was performed on August 30, 2012.

Simultaneous sampling was performed at the Kiln No. 2 Dry Limestone Adsorber (DLA) Inlet Duct and at the

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the hydrochloric acid (HCl) and hydrofluoric acid (HF) reduction

efficiency (RE) of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2. Sampling was also performed at the Kiln No. 2 DLA

Exhaust Stack to determine the emissions of filterable particulate matter (PM). Testing was conducted while

Kiln No. 2 operated at Maximum Production Level. During this test, emissions from Kiln No. 2 were

controlled by a DLA.

In addition to the sampling noted above, opacity readings were taken at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to

determine Visible Emissions (VEs) (as percent opacity). Readings were taken while the kiln operated at

Maximum Production Level.

The test methods that were conducted during this test were EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 26A.

1.2 Key Personnel

The key personnel who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were:

Mike Krzyzanowski, Environmental Manager, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-562-3076

Rajdeep Bhangu, Air Quality Program, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, 717-772-2304

William Borst, Air Quality Program, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, 717-390-2360

Tyson Houchin QSTI, Operations Director, Air Compliance Testing, Inc., 800-372-2471

Brian Isom QI, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc., 800-372-2471

Sin Hoi Chiew QI, Reporting Engineer, Air Compliance Testing, Inc., 800-372-2471

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS

2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix

The purpose of this test was to determine the HCl and HF REs associated with the DLA of Kiln No. 2 during

operations at Maximum Production Levels. The purpose of this test was also to determine the emissions of

filterable PM and the percent opacity of VEs at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack while the kiln operated at

Maximum Production Level. Testing was performed to satisfy the emissions testing requirements pursuant to

Glen-Gery's PA DEP Operating Permit No. 67-05045 and 40 CFR Part 63 - Subpart JJJJJ.

The specific test objectives for this test were to:

Simultaneously measure the concentrations of HCl and HF at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct and the

concentrations of HCl, HF, and filterable PM at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack.

Simultaneously measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Kiln No. 2

DLA Inlet Duct and Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack.

Utilize the above variables to determine the HCl and HF REs of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2 and the

emissions of filterable PM at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack while Kiln No. 2 operated at Maximum

Production Level.

Determine the VEs (as %-opacity) at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack while Kiln No. 2 operated at

Maximum Production Level.

Table 2.1 presents the sampling and analytical matrix log for this test.

2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems

No field test changes or problems occurred during the performance of this test that would bias the accuracy of

the results of this test.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

2.3 Presentation of Results

Single sampling trains were utilized during each run at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct and at the Kiln No. 2

DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the HCl and HF REs of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2 and at the Kiln

No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the emissions of filterable PM. These sampling trains measured the

stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentrations of HCl and HF. In

addition, the sampling train at the exhaust was used to measure the stack gas concentration of filterable PM.

Table 2.2 displays the HCl and HF REs of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2 and the emissions of filterable

PM measured at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack.

Table 2.2 also displays the maximum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust

Stack.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

EPA TEST METHODS UTILIZED

Date

Run

No. Sampling Location

8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30

9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14

11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56

8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:13 8:13 - 9:30

9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 10:54 9:53 - 11:14

11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:59 - 12:59 11:39 - 12:56

All times are Eastern Daylight Time.

Table 2.1 - Sampling and Analytical Matrix

72 72 72 60 72

72

60 72

60

3

8/29/2012 1 Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

8/29/2012 2 Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

8/29/2012 3 Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

8/29/2012 1

8/29/2012 2

M3 M4

72

8/29/2012

M1/M2

(Flow)

Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

M5

(%H (Filterable PM) 2O)

72

Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

M26A

(HCl and HF)

Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

M9

Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

72

72 72

-

72

72 72

-

72

72

Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

(VEs)

Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

-

(Dry Mol. Wt.)

-

72 72 72

72 72

-

72 72 72

72 72

72

-

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Product Throughput Rate (ton/hr)* - - - - 12.81 12.81 12.81 12.81

HCl Reduction Efficiency (%) - - - - 36.16 47.84 42.47 42.16

HF Reduction Efficiency (%) - - - - 88.74 89.70 89.29 89.24

Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) - - - - 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012

Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.24 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration (ppmvd) 3.15 4.00 3.62 3.59 2.15 2.11 2.18 2.15

Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) - - - - 0.035 0.035 0.033 0.035

Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3.99 4.37 4.00 4.12 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.44

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration (ppmvd) 94.8 109.4 98.4 100.9 11.4 11.4 11.0 11.3

Filterable Particulate Matter Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) - - - - 0.202 0.246 0.235 0.228

Filterable Particulate Matter Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) - - - - 2.59 3.15 3.01 2.92

Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration (grains/dscf) - - - - 0.024 0.029 0.028 0.027

Maximum Six-Minute Average of Visible Emissions (%-opacity) - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (acfm) 23,214 22,051 22,600 22,621 21,926 21,813 21,517 21,752

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (scfm) 14,939 14,329 14,559 14,609 14,101 14,113 13,911 14,042

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (dscfm) 13,517 12,839 13,062 13,139 12,687 12,695 12,471 12,618

Stack Gas Average Velocity (fpm) 1,882 1,788 1,833 1,834 1,812 1,803 1,778 1,798

Stack Gas Average Static Pressure (in-H2O) -1.00 -1.00 -1.10 -1.03 -0.21 -0.23 -0.20 -0.21

Stack Gas Average Temperature (°F) 350 343 349 347 351 346 347 348

Stack Gas Percent by Volume Moisture (%H2O) 9.52 10.40 10.28 10.07 10.03 10.05 10.35 10.14

Measured Stack Inner Diameter (in)† 47.3 x 47.8 47.3 x 47.8 47.3 x 47.8 47.3 x 47.8 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1

Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%CO2

) 3.00 2.67 2.50 2.72 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50

Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%O2

) 15.50 15.50 14.83 15.28 15.00 15.00 15.33 15.11

Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%N2

) 81.50 81.83 82.67 82.00 82.50 82.50 82.17 82.39

* Production data was supplied by Glen-Gery Corporation personnel.

† The Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape.

Table 2.2 - Emission Results

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 6 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS

3.1 Process Description and Operation

Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant operates two natural gas-fired tunnel kilns. The kilns produce brick of

various sizes and colors. Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102) has been fitted with a dry limestone absorber (DLA)

system manufactured by Hellmich to control Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride emissions. Kiln No. 2

was in operation during the performance of this test.

Figure 3.1 depicts the process schematic.

3.2 Control Equipment Description

During this test emissions from the Kiln No. 2 were controlled by the DLA and the bypass damper was closed.

The DLA system is comprised of a limestone cascade absorber equipped with a limestone silo located atop the

DLA and an extraction system to provide crushed limestone to the cascade absorber tower. Exhaust gas from

the kiln is passed through the absorber to the crushed limestone which is slowly extracted from the base of the

absorber. The absorber is equipped with a peeling drum that mechanically removes the reacted layer from the

crushed limestone. The "peeled" limestone is pneumatically conveyed from the peeling drum back to the

limestone feed bin, located on top of the absorber. The reacted layer that has been peeled from the limestone is

discharged via gravity to a hopper for disposal.

3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations

3.3.1 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

The Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 47.3-inches and 47.8-

inches. The duct was oriented in the horizontal plane and was accessed from a permanent platform. Two (2)

4.0-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1,

Section 11.1.1 criteria. On the day of the test, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow.

An average yaw angle of 7.67o was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1,

Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate,

dry molecular weight, moisture content, HCl, and HF concentration determinations.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 7 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

3.3.2 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

The Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack was cicular in shape with a measured inner diameter of 47.1-inches. The

stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a permanent platform. Two (2) 3.7-inch I.D.

sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1

criteria. On the day of the test, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw

angle of 6.25o was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2

criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular

weight, moisture content, total filterable PM, HCl, and HF concentration determinations.

Figures 3.2 and 3.3 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized.

3.4 Process Sampling Location

Process sampling was completed by Glen-Gery as part of their QA/QC program and included raw material

sampling at the pug mill as well as Fire Check Key testing in the kiln. In addition, 1⁄2 brick was removed from

cars after the drier/prior to kiln entry as well as at kiln exit for purposes of mass balance testing if results of the

stack test did not indicate compliance. Results from the QA/QC testing were unavailable at the time of this

report.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 8 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Figure 3.1 - Tunnel Kiln Process Schematic

Tunnel Kiln

EPA Methods

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A

sampling location

Atmosphere

Green Brick

from Dryers

Natural Gas

Fired Brick

Cascade

Adsorber

LS Feed

Silo

Peeling

Drum

Extraction

Screw

Recycle LS

DLA

Bypass

Damper

Closed

Reacted LS to

Covered Bins

EPA Methods

1, 2, 3, 4, and 26A

sampling location

Limestone

From Trucks

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 9 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Figure 3.2 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct Traverse Point Location Drawing

(2) 4.0"

Sampling Ports

Located 90°

Apart

100.0"

2.89 Equivalent

Diameters Downstream

From Disturbance

85.0"

1.78 Equivalent

Diameters Upstream

From Disturbance

47.3" x 47.8" I.D.

Elliptical Stack

47.3" I.D.

Port 2

Port 1

6.0"

8

7 9

10

11

5 12

4 6

3

2

1

6.5"

% of Duct Depth

Distance From

Inside Wall (in.)

Port 1

1.0

3.2

5.6

8.4

11.8

16.8

30.5

35.5

38.9

41.7

44.1

46.3

Point

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

2.1

6.7

11.8

17.7

25.0

35.6

64.4

75.0

82.3

88.2

93.3

97.9

1.0

3.2

5.6

8.5

12.0

17.0

30.8

35.9

39.3

42.2

44.6

46.8

Distance From

Inside Wall (in.)

Port 2

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 10 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Figure 3.3 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing

47.1" I.D.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 11 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

4.1 Test Methods

4.1.1 EPA Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source

Principle: To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate

from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in a known direction is

selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then

located within each of these equal areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined

in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S)

Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of the

average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method was utilized in its

entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight

Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab

sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is

analyzed for percent CO2, percent O2, and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight

determination a Fyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the

procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases

Principle: A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample

stream and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per

the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Filterable PM only)

Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber

filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ± 14°C (248 ± 25°F) or such other temperature as

specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at

or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. This

method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

4.1.6 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources

Principle: The opacity of emissions from stationary sources is determined visually by a qualified observer.

This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 12 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

4.1.7 EPA Method 26A: Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary SourcesIsokinetic Method

Principle: This method is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride

(HCl), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X2) [chlorine (Cl2) and bromine

(Br2)] from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore

particularly suited for sampling at sources, such as those controlled by wet scrubbers, emitting acid particulate

matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the

procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

The sampling train utilized during this testing project is depicted in Figure 4.1.

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data

Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant personnel utilizing their typical record

keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the

conclusion of this test event. The process data is located in Table 2.2 and in the Appendix.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 13 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Figure 4.1 - EPA Method 5/26A Sampling Train Schematic

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 14 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES

5.1 QA Audits

Tables 5.1 - 5.3 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test.

All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements of their

respective methods as is shown in Tables 5.1.1 - 5.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below

the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable.

Table 5.3 displays the laboratory QA results for EPA Method 26A. The HCl spike recovery of 97% was

within the normal range of 75% to 125%. All samples were analyzed in duplicate.

Charles Giffels was certified on April 11, 2012 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The certification expires in

six months from the issue date.

For quality assurance, the observer obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting

background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to his back. Readings were taken every 15 seconds

and made to the nearest 5% opacity.

5.2 QA/QC Problems

No QA/QC problems occurred during this test event.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 15 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

Method 26A Sampling Train Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm) 0.003 / 0.000 0.003 / 0.001 0.001 / 0.001

Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate (cfm) < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes

Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 42.091 38.434 40.569

Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 36.00 36.00 36.00

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes

Percent of Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 100.5 96.6 100.2

Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

Method 5/26A Sampling Train Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm) 0.003 / 0.000 0.003 / 0.000 0.002 / 0.002

Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate (cfm) < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes

Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 59.713 59.612 57.707

Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 50.00 50.00 50.00

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes

Percent of Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 103.1 101.8 101.4

Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes

Table 5.1 - Sample Train Audit Results Table

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 16 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct - Method 26A

Pre-Test Dry Gas

Meter Calibration

Factor

(Y)

Average Post-Test

Dry Gas Meter

Calibration Check

Value

(Yqa)

Post Test Dry Gas

Meter Calibration

Check Value

Difference From

Pre-Test

Calibration Factor

(%)

Applicable Method

Allowable

Difference

(%) Acceptable

0.9876 1.0021 1.47% 5.00% Yes

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack - Method 5/26A

Pre-Test Dry Gas

Meter Calibration

Factor

(Y)

Average Post-Test

Dry Gas Meter

Calibration Check

Value

(Yqa)

Post Test Dry Gas

Meter Calibration

Check Value

Difference From

Pre-Test

Calibration Factor

(%)

Applicable Method

Allowable

Difference

(%) Acceptable

0.9897 0.9864 -0.34% 5.00% Yes

Table 5.2 - Dry Gas Meter Audit Results Table

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 17 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

HCl

Spike Recovery (%) 97.0

Acceptable per Applicable Method (Yes / No)

(Expected Range 75% - 125%) Yes

Table 5.3 - EPA Method 26A Laboratory Recovery Analysis Results Table

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 18 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

6.0 APPENDIX

Appendix attached.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 19 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805
APPENDIX

to

Compliance Stack Emission Test Report

Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and

Hydrofluoric Acid Reduction Efficiency

and Filterable Particulate Matter and

Visible Emissions

Natural Gas-Fired Tunnel Kiln No. 2

(Source ID: 102)

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 and 26A

Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

York, Pennsylvania

Date Conducted: August 30, 2012

Job Number: 120805

Prepared by:

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

PO Box 41156

Cleveland OH 44141-0156

Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471)

Report Date: September 27, 2012
Appendix Contents

1-PROCESS DATA

Process Operational Data

2-LABORATORY DATA

Laboratory Results

3-FIELD DATA

A B Excel Test Data

A B Excel Method Specific Data

A B Excel Run Data

A B Example Calculation

Test Log (CEMS Methods)

Main Method Field Data Sheets

A B Isokinetic Field Data Sheets

A B EPA Method 9 Field Data

A B EPA Method 4 and ALT-008 Moisture Recovery

A B EPA Method 3 Fyrite/Orsat Field Data

A B EPA Method 3 Dry Molecular Weight Calculation

EPA Method 2 Flow Data Sheets

A B EPA Method 1 Cyclonic Flow

A B EPA Method 1 Preliminary Field Data

4-CALIBRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

ANALYZER CALIBRATIONS

Analyzer Calibration Error

Analyzer System Bias and System Drift

EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS / CALIBRATIONS

Probe Nozzle Inspections

Pre-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Inspections

Post-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Inspections

Pre-Test Thermocouple System Audit

Post-Test Thermocouple Check

10-Minute Cals

Pre-Test Meter Box Leak Check

Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice Calibration

Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration

Post-Test dry Gas Meter ALT-009 Leak Check

Post-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice and Console Calibration

Post-Test Mini Meter / Orifice and Console Calibration

EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATIONS / HISTORY

Dry Gas Meter Calibration History

Aneroid Barometer/ DPG Calibration History

Acetone Residuals History

Calibration Gas Certifications

Calibration Gas Diluter Certifications

Quartz or Glass Fiber Filter Certification

True Primary Flow Standard

Reference Meter Calibration

Micromanometer Certificate

: Thermocouple Certificate of Calibration

Lake Balance (Method 4 and ALT-008)

Lake Balance Report for H64 (Gravimetrics)

VE Azimuth Tables

VE Declination

VE Certificates

Intent to Test Notification / Test Protocol

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. -0-Appendix Content - 120805

Document Control No.: RPT-APP-001B

Revised: February 20, 2012
Location Run #'s Date

Push Rate

(Min.)

Pieces

Per Car

Weight/Brick

(lbs)

Throughput

(Tons/Hr)

Actual

Throughput

(Tons/Hr)

Max.

Throughput

(Tons/Hr)

% of Max. Product Ty

1980 3.8 10.75 Extruded Co

288 5 2.06 Extruded So

Source

min/hour of

extraction

Kiln #2 11.22

1, 2, 3 12.90 99.3%

Type and Grade of Limestone:

OldCastle Industrial Minerals - #1 Coarse Product

Screened CaCO3limestone

Extraction Rates:

York Plant Stack Test Process Data - August 30, 2012

Kiln #2 8/30/2012 21 12.81







Your P.O. #: 120805 

Your Project #: 120805 

Attention: Tate Strickler

Air Compliance Testing Inc.

P.O. Box 41156

Cleveland, OH

USA 4414-0156

Report Date: 2012/09/20

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B2D7195

Received: 2012/09/06, 13:10

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 7

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. 7 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 7 N/A 2012/09/13 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

Clayton Johnson, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8
Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805

Report Date: 2012/09/20

Your P.O. #: 120805

EPA M26A HYDROGEN HALIDES AND HALOGENS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID O T 3 6 3 0 O T 3 6 3 1 O T 3 6 3 2

Sampling Date 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 2012/08/30

11:01 10:05 11:50

 U n i t s BLANK-120805-M26A/BH1 RDL 1-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL QC Batch

Sulfuric Acid Volume ml 396 1 432 1 466 1 2969455

Miscellaneous Parameters

Hydrochloric Acid ug <200 200 5700 200 6600 200 2969477

Hydrofluoric Acid ug <200 200 94000 1000 99000 2000 2969477

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID O T 3 6 3 2 O T 3 6 3 3 O T 3 6 3 4

Sampling Date 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 2012/08/30

11:50 13:38 10:20

 U n i t s 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL 3-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL 1-120805B-M26A/BH1 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Sulfuric Acid Volume ml 1 427 1 467 1 2969455

Miscellaneous Parameters

Hydrochloric Acid ug 6600 200 6300 200 5500 200 2969477

Hydrofluoric Acid ug 100000 2000 94000 1000 16000 200 2969477

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID O T 3 6 3 5 O T 3 6 3 6

Sampling Date 2012/08/30 2012/08/30

12:11 13:22

 U n i t s 2-120805B-M26A/BH1 3-120805B-M26A/BH1 RDL QC Batch

Sulfuric Acid Volume ml 463 448 1 2969455

Miscellaneous Parameters

Hydrochloric Acid ug 5400 5400 200 2969477

Hydrofluoric Acid ug 16000 15000 200 2969477

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805

Report Date: 2012/09/20

Your P.O. #: 120805

Test Summary

Maxxam ID OT3630 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID BLANK-120805-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Maxxam ID OT3631 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 1-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Maxxam ID OT3632 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Maxxam ID OT3632 D u p Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Maxxam ID OT3633 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 3-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Maxxam ID OT3634 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 1-120805B-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Page 3 of 8
Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805

Report Date: 2012/09/20

Your P.O. #: 120805

Test Summary

Maxxam ID OT3635 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 2-120805B-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Maxxam ID OT3636 Collected 2012/08/30

Sample ID 3-120805B-M26A/BH1 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Page 4 of 8
Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805

Report Date: 2012/09/20

Your P.O. #: 120805

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Attention: Tate Strickler 

Client Project #: 120805

P.O. #: 120805

Site Location: 

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB2D7195

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2969477 A_S Matrix Spike

(OT3632) Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 102 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 107 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 101 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 103 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 <200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 <200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 0.6 % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 8
Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

Frank Mo, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager 

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 7 of 8
Page 8 of 8
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct

TEST DATA

Number of Test Runs 3

Traverse Points 24

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 (circular) (in) 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 (circular) (in) 47.8 47.8 47.8 47.8

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Barometric Pressure at Ground Level (Pbar) (in Hg) 29.64 29.64 29.64 29.64

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft) 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00

Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 630.804 672.964 713.989

Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 673.975 713.903 757.775

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma) 0.9876 0.9876 0.9876 0.9876

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@) 1.876 1.876 1.876 1.876

Total Sampling Run Time (Theta) (min) 72 72 72 72

Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the Impingers (g) 81.7 86.4 89.3 85.8

Weight of Water Vapor Collected in Silica Gel (g) 12.2 8.2 9.3 9.9

Air Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (%-dry) 3.00 2.67 2.50 2.72

Air Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 15.50 15.50 14.83 15.28

Air Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 81.50 81.83 82.67 82.00

Average Pitot Rotation Angle Port Number 1 9.5

Port Number 2 5.8

Test Run Start Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 8:13 8/30/2012 9:53 8/30/2012 11:39

Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 9:30 8/30/2012 11:14 8/30/2012 12:56

DETAILED RESULTS

Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 12.332 12.332 12.332 12.332

Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 29.63 29.63 29.63 29.63

Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (lb/lb-mole) 29.10 29.05 28.99 29.05

Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (lb/lb-mole) 28.04 27.90 27.86 27.93

Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 29.55 29.55 29.54 29.55

Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H2O) -1.00 -1.00 -1.10 -1.03

Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 350.4 342.5 349.3 347.4

Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (°R) 810.4 802.5 809.3 807.4

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/sec) 31.37 29.80 30.54 30.57

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 1,882 1,788 1,833 1,834

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 23,214 22,051 22,600 22,621

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (scfm) 14,939 14,329 14,559 14,609

Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) (dscfm) 13,517 12,839 13,062 13,139

Percent by Volume Moisture as measured in Stack Gas (%H2O) 9.52 10.40 10.28 10.07

Test Results

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) (dscf) 42.091 38.434 40.569 40.365

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.585 0.534 0.563 0.561

Predicted 1-Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 35.076 32.029 33.807 33.637

Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1-bw/100) 0.905 0.896 0.897 0.899

Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H2O) 0.1963 0.1800 0.1863 0.1875

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.4418 0.4206 0.4290 0.4305

Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H2O) 1.1504 1.0771 1.1492 1.1256

Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 71.333 91.708 99.125 87.389

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) (°R) 531.333 551.708 559.125 547.389

Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) (acf) 43.171 40.939 43.786 42.632

Post-Test Calibration (Yqa) 0.9845 1.0247 0.9970 1.0021

Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference (%) 0.31 -3.75 -0.96 -1.47

SAMPLING QA

Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (dscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020

Current Sampling Rate Status OK OK OK

Probe Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 0.312 0.312

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate (% I) 100.5 96.6 100.2

In Field Isokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD

Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H2O 0 0 0

Sensitivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.013 1.014 1.014

Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes / No) ? YES YES YES

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 1 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS

 Point

Count Run #

 Run

Time

(min)

Pitot Delta

P (in

H2O)

Square

Root of

Delta P

Orifice

Delta H

(in H2O)

DGM

Temp

OUT (°F)

Average

DGM

Temp (°F)

Stack

Pressure

(in H2O)

Stack

Temp (°F)

1 1 0 0.22 0.469 1.30 63 63.00 -1 356

2 1 3 0.22 0.469 1.30 63 63.00 356

3 1 6 0.22 0.469 1.30 63 63.00 357

4 1 9 0.24 0.490 1.50 64 64.00 356

5 1 12 0.21 0.458 1.30 65 65.00 354

6 1 15 0.21 0.458 1.30 66 66.00 353

7 1 18 0.18 0.424 1.00 67 67.00 352

8 1 21 0.18 0.424 1.00 68 68.00 350

9 1 24 0.20 0.447 1.20 68 68.00 350

10 1 27 0.20 0.447 1.20 69 69.00 348

11 1 30 0.20 0.447 1.20 70 70.00 349

12 1 33 0.16 0.400 0.93 71 71.00 340

13 1 36 0.23 0.480 1.30 72 72.00 342

14 1 39 0.23 0.480 1.30 73 73.00 342

15 1 42 0.23 0.480 1.30 74 74.00 345

16 1 45 0.22 0.469 1.30 75 75.00 348

17 1 48 0.20 0.447 1.20 76 76.00 349

18 1 51 0.20 0.447 1.20 77 77.00 350

19 1 54 0.18 0.424 1.00 77 77.00 350

20 1 57 0.18 0.424 1.00 78 78.00 350

21 1 60 0.15 0.387 0.87 78 78.00 355

22 1 63 0.15 0.387 0.87 78 78.00 353

23 1 66 0.15 0.387 0.87 78 78.00 353

24 1 69 0.15 0.387 0.87 79 79.00 351

25 2 0 0.23 0.480 1.30 84 84.00 -1 345

26 2 3 0.23 0.480 1.30 85 85.00 345

27 2 6 0.23 0.480 1.30 86 86.00 346

28 2 9 0.23 0.480 1.30 89 89.00 352

29 2 12 0.22 0.469 1.30 89 89.00 354

30 2 15 0.20 0.447 1.16 90 90.00 352

31 2 18 0.13 0.361 0.75 91 91.00 350

32 2 21 0.12 0.346 0.70 91 91.00 352

33 2 24 0.12 0.346 0.70 92 92.00 353

34 2 27 0.12 0.346 0.70 92 92.00 355

35 2 30 0.11 0.332 0.64 92 92.00 235

36 2 33 0.09 0.300 0.52 92 92.00 270

37 2 36 0.20 0.447 1.24 91 91.00 353

38 2 39 0.24 0.490 1.49 92 92.00 352

39 2 42 0.22 0.469 1.36 93 93.00 357

40 2 45 0.22 0.469 1.36 93 93.00 359

41 2 48 0.21 0.458 1.30 94 94.00 356

42 2 51 0.17 0.412 1.05 94 94.00 356

43 2 54 0.15 0.387 0.93 94 94.00 355

44 2 57 0.17 0.412 1.05 94 94.00 350

45 2 60 0.20 0.447 1.24 92 92.00 354

46 2 63 0.18 0.424 1.12 96 96.00 346

47 2 66 0.17 0.412 1.05 97 97.00 344

48 2 69 0.16 0.400 0.99 98 98.00 330

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 2 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS

 Point

Count Run #

 Run

Time

(min)

Pitot Delta

P (in

H2O)

Square

Root of

Delta P

Orifice

Delta H

(in H2O)

DGM

Temp

OUT (°F)

Average

DGM

Temp (°F)

Stack

Pressure

(in H2O)

Stack

Temp (°F)

49 3 0 0.22 0.469 1.36 96 96.00 -1.1 356

50 3 3 0.22 0.469 1.40 97 97.00 352

51 3 6 0.25 0.500 1.50 97 97.00 356

52 3 9 0.21 0.458 1.30 98 98.00 357

53 3 12 0.21 0.458 1.30 98 98.00 355

54 3 15 0.18 0.424 1.10 99 99.00 358

55 3 18 0.18 0.424 1.10 99 99.00 355

56 3 21 0.18 0.424 1.10 100 100.00 350

57 3 24 0.18 0.424 1.10 100 100.00 344

58 3 27 0.21 0.458 1.30 100 100.00 340

59 3 30 0.22 0.469 1.40 100 100.00 346

60 3 33 0.17 0.412 1.05 100 100.00 342

61 3 36 0.21 0.458 1.30 98 98.00 347

62 3 39 0.21 0.458 1.30 99 99.00 345

63 3 42 0.24 0.490 1.48 99 99.00 344

64 3 45 0.22 0.469 1.35 99 99.00 348

65 3 48 0.21 0.458 1.29 100 100.00 348

66 3 51 0.19 0.436 1.17 100 100.00 346

67 3 54 0.12 0.346 0.74 100 100.00 346

68 3 57 0.12 0.346 0.74 100 100.00 350

69 3 60 0.12 0.346 0.74 100 100.00 349

70 3 63 0.14 0.374 0.86 100 100.00 351

71 3 66 0.13 0.361 0.80 100 100.00 350

72 3 69 0.13 0.361 0.80 100 100.00 349

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 3 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct TEST DATA

DETAILED RESULTS

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Emission Results:

Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.24 0.29 0.27 0.27

Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3.99 4.37 4.00 4.12

LAB RESULTS HCL

Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

HCl Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHCl) (ml) 432.0 466.0 427.0 441.7

HCl Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 13.2 14.2 14.8 14.0

HCl Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HCl Total Mass in sample, (mHCl) (mg) 5.70 6.60 6.30 6.20

Stack Gas Concentration

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) 1.192 1.088 1.149 1.143

HCl Concentration, dry basis (ConcHCl) (mg/dscm) 4.78 6.06 5.48 5.44

HCl Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 3.15 4.00 3.62 3.59

HCl Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 2.85 3.58 3.25 3.23

LAB RESULTS HF

Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

HF Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHF) (ml) 432.0 466.0 427.0 441.7

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 217.6 212.4 220.1 216.7

HF Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) (mg) 94.00 99.00 94.00 95.67

Stack Gas Concentration

HF Concentration, dry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 78.87 90.96 81.83 83.88

HF Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 94.82 109.37 98.38 100.86

HF Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 85.80 98.00 88.27 90.69

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 4 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 26A Nomenclature and

Sample Calculations

Run No. - 1

Constants

CO2Fwt= 44.0 in wg= 0.073529 NO2Fwt= 46.01 HClFwt= 36.46

O2Fwt= 32.0 gr= 0.000142857 COFwt= 28.01 SO2Fwt= 64.06

CON2Fwt= 28.0 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu H2SO4Fwt= 98.08 Cl2Fwt= 70.91

H2OFwt= 18.0 CFwt= 12.011 Tstd= 528 Pstd= 29.92

PFwt= 44.0962 HFFwt= 20.006

Stack Variables

Cp = 0.84 pitot tube coefficient (dimensionless)

Pbar = 29.64 in. Hg barometric pressure

Ebox = 0 ft elevation difference between ground level and meter box

Esam = 15 ft elevation difference between ground level and sampling ports

J 0.9876 gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensionless)

T 72.0 min net run time (minutes)

Vlc = 93.9 g total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g)

%CO2 = 3.00 % percent CO2 by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless)

%O2 = 15.50 % percent O2 by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless)

%N2 = 81.50 % percent N2 by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless)

A = 12.3315 ft2

stack cross-sectional area

Pg = -1.00 in. H2O flue gas static pressure

Tsavg = 810.38 R average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg °F)

SQ'Pavg = 0.44 in. wg average square root 'P

'H = 1.15 in. wg average pressure differential of orifice meter

Tm = 531.33 R dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F)

Vm = 43.17 ft3

volume of metered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet)

Calculated Stack Variables

Barometric pressure at sampling location

NOTE: Barometric pressure recorded at ground level

Psam =Pbar - [ ( Esam / 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ]

Psam = 29.64 - ( ( 15.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 )

Psam = 29.63 in. Hg

Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf)

Vmstd = J * Vm * [ Pbar - ( [ ( Ebox / 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ] + ( 'H / 13.6 ) ) / Pstd ] * ( Tstd / Tm )

Vmstd = 0.9876 * 43.171 * ( ( 29.64 - ( ( 0.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) + ( 1.1504 / 13.6 ) ) / 29.92 ) * ( 528.0 / 531.333 )

Vmstd = 42.091 ft3

Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 °F, scf)

Vwstd = ( 0.04715 ft3

/g ) * Vlc

Vwstd = ( 0.04715 * 93.9 )

Vwstd = 4.4 ft3

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 5 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct

Percent moisture by volume as measured in flue gas

%H2O (Measured) = 100 * [ Vwstd / ( Vwstd + Vmstd ) ]

%H2O (Measured) = 100 * ( 4.427 / ( 4.427 + 42.091 ) )

%H2O (Measured) = 9.52

%H2O (Saturated) = ( 100 / Psam ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( Tsavg + 390.86 - 460 ) ) )

%H2O (Saturated) = ( 100 / 29.551471 ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( 810.375000 + 390.86 - 460 ) ) )

%H2O (Saturated) = 952.91

%H2O = 9.52

Absolute flue gas pressure

Ps =Psam + ( Pg / 13.6 )

Ps = 29.63 + ( -1.00 / 13.6 )

Ps = 29.55 in. Hg

Dry mole fraction of flue gas (dimensionless)

Mfd = 1 - ( %H2O / 100 )

Mfd = 1 - ( 9.52 / 100 )

Mfd = 0.905

Dry molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

Md = [ ( %CO2 / 100 ) * 44.0 ] + [ ( %O2 / 100 ) * 32.0 ] + [ ( ( 100 - %CO2 - %O2 ) / 100 ) * 28.0 ]

Md = ( ( 3.00 / 100 ) * 44.0 ) + ( ( 15.50 / 100 ) * 32.0 ) + ( ( ( 100 - 3.00 - 15.50 ) / 100 ) * 28.0 )

Md = 29.10 lb/lb-mole

Md = 29.10

Wet molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

Ms = Md * Mfd + ( H2OFwt * ( %H2O / 100 ) )

Ms = 29.100 * 0.905 + 18.00 * ( 9.52 / 100 )

Ms = 28.04 lb/lb-mole

Average flue gas velocity (ft/sec)

vs = 85.49 * Cp * ( SQ'Pavg ) * ( Tavg / ( Ps

 * Ms ) )0.5

vs = 85.49 * 0.84 * ( 0.4418 ) * ( 810.38 / ( 29.551 * 28.044 ) ) ^ 0.5

vs = 31.37 ft/sec

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 6 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 6 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Inlet Duct

Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at actual conditions (acfm)

Qaw =vs * A * 60 sec/min

Qaw = 31.374 * 12.332 * 60

Qaw = 23,214 ft3

/min

Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (scfm)

Qsdw =vs * A * ( Tstd / Tsavg ) * ( Ps / Pstd ) * 60 sec/min

Qsdw = 31.374 * 12.332 * ( 528.0 / 810.375 ) * ( 29.551 / 29.92 ) * 60

Qsdw = 14,939 ft3

/min

Dry volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (dscfm)

Qsd =Mfd * vs * A * ( Tstd / Tsavg ) * ( Ps / Pstd ) * 60 sec/min

Qsd = 0.905 * 31.3744 * 12.3315 * ( 528.0 / 810.375 ) * ( 29.551 / 29.92 ) * 60

Qsd = 13,517 ft3

/min

Isokinetic Calculations

Percent isokinetic of sampling rate (%)

%I = ( Pstd / Tstd ) * ( Tsavg / Ps

 ) * [ Vmstd / ( vs * Mfd * T * S * ( Dn

 / 2 )2 ) ]

%I = ((((29.92 / 528.0) * (810.375 / 29.551)) * (42.091 / (31.3744 * 0.905 * 72.0 * (()3.141593 * (0.312 / 2) ^ 2) / 144))) / 60) * 100

%I = 100.5 %

Method 26A Calculations

HCl concentration (ppmvd)

HClppmvd = 3.15 ppmvd

HCl mass emission rate (lb/hr)

MERHCl = ( 60 min/hr * HCl ppmvd * HClFwt * lb * Qsd ) / ( 385.3 ft3

 * 106 )

MERHCl = 60 * 3.155 * 36.46 * 13,517 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 )

MERHCl = 0.242 lb/hr

HF concentration (ppmvd)

HFppmvd = 94.82 ppmvd

HF mass emission rate (lb/hr)

MERHF = ( 60 min/hr * HF ppmvd * HFFwt * lb * Qsd ) / ( 385.3 ft3 * 106

 )

MERHF = 60 * 94.822 * 20.01 * 13,517 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 )

MERHF = 3.99 lb/hr

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 7 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805A

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 7 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 8 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 9 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 10 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 11 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 12 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 13 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 14 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 15 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 16 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 17 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 18 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 19 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 20 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack

TEST DATA

Number of Test Runs 3

Traverse Points 12

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 (circular) (in) 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 (circular) (in) 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Barometric Pressure at Ground Level (Pbar) (in Hg) 29.64 29.64 29.64 29.64

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft) 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00

Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 265.519 326.146 388.723

Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 326.023 388.601 449.705

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma) 0.9897 0.9897 0.9897 0.9897

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@) 2.135 2.135 2.135 2.135

Total Sampling Run Time (Theta) (min) 72 72 72 72

Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the Impingers (g) 123.3 121.5 123.2 122.7

Weight of Water Vapor Collected in Silica Gel (g) 17.9 19.7 18.1 18.6

Air Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (%-dry) 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50

Air Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 15.00 15.00 15.33 15.11

Air Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 82.50 82.50 82.17 82.39

Average Pitot Rotation Angle Port Number 1 5.7

Port Number 2 6.8

Test Run Start Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 8:13 8/30/2012 9:53 8/30/2012 11:39

Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 9:30 8/30/2012 11:14 8/30/2012 12:56

DETAILED RESULTS

Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 12.100 12.100 12.100 12.100

Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 29.58 29.58 29.58 29.58

Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (lb/lb-mole) 29.00 29.00 29.01 29.00

Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (lb/lb-mole) 27.90 27.89 27.87 27.89

Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 29.56 29.56 29.57 29.56

Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H2O) -0.21 -0.23 -0.20 -0.21

Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 351.3 346.3 347.0 348.2

Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (°R) 811.3 806.3 807.0 808.2

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/sec) 30.20 30.05 29.64 29.96

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 1,812 1,803 1,778 1,798

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 21,926 21,813 21,517 21,752

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (scfm) 14,101 14,113 13,911 14,042

Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) (dscfm) 12,687 12,695 12,471 12,618

Percent by Volume Moisture as measured in Stack Gas (%H2O) 10.03 10.05 10.35 10.14

Test Results

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) (dscf) 59.713 59.612 57.707 59.011

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.829 0.828 0.801 0.820

Predicted 1-Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 49.761 49.677 48.089 49.176

Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1-bw/100) 0.900 0.900 0.896 0.899

Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H2O) 0.1808 0.1800 0.1750 0.1786

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.4241 0.4231 0.4171 0.4214

Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H2O) 2.6083 2.6500 2.5500 2.6028

Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 67.833 85.833 90.417 81.361

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) (°R) 527.833 545.833 550.417 541.361

Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) (acf) 60.504 62.455 60.982 61.314

Post-Test Calibration (Yqa) 0.9882 0.9812 0.9898 0.9864

Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference (%) 0.15 0.86 -0.01 0.34

SAMPLING QA

Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (dscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020

Probe Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.375 0.377 0.375

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate (% I) 103.1 101.8 101.4

In Field Isokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD

Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H2O 0 0 0

Sensitivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.014 1.014 1.014

Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes / No) ? YES YES YES

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 21 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS Exhaust Stack

 Point

Count Run #

 Run

Time

(min)

Pitot Delta

P (in

H2O)

Square

Root of

Delta P

Orifice

Delta H

(in H2O)

DGM

Temp

OUT (°F)

Average

DGM

Temp (°F)

Stack

Pressure

(in H2O)

Stack

Temp (°F)

1 1 0 0.20 0.447 2.90 65 65.00 -0.21 357

2 1 6 0.20 0.447 2.90 65 65.00 356

3 1 12 0.20 0.447 2.90 66 66.00 356

4 1 18 0.21 0.458 3.00 66 66.00 353

5 1 24 0.15 0.387 2.20 67 67.00 350

6 1 30 0.15 0.387 2.20 68 68.00 347

7 1 36 0.15 0.387 2.10 67 67.00 345

8 1 42 0.21 0.458 3.00 68 68.00 348

9 1 48 0.21 0.458 3.00 69 69.00 349

10 1 54 0.19 0.436 2.70 70 70.00 350

11 1 60 0.15 0.387 2.20 71 71.00 353

12 1 66 0.15 0.387 2.20 72 72.00 351

13 2 0 0.14 0.374 2.00 82 82.00 -0.23 346

14 2 6 0.14 0.374 2.00 83 83.00 346

15 2 12 0.20 0.447 2.90 84 84.00 346

16 2 18 0.20 0.447 2.90 85 85.00 348

17 2 24 0.20 0.447 3.00 85 85.00 348

18 2 30 0.15 0.387 2.30 86 86.00 347

19 2 36 0.18 0.424 2.80 86 86.00 346

20 2 42 0.20 0.447 2.90 87 87.00 345

21 2 48 0.20 0.447 2.90 87 87.00 346

22 2 54 0.20 0.447 2.90 88 88.00 346

23 2 60 0.20 0.447 2.90 88 88.00 347

24 2 66 0.15 0.387 2.30 89 89.00 345

25 3 0 0.15 0.387 2.20 88 88.00 -0.2 344

26 3 6 0.15 0.387 2.20 88 88.00 350

27 3 12 0.21 0.458 3.10 89 89.00 351

28 3 18 0.21 0.458 3.10 90 90.00 353

29 3 24 0.16 0.400 2.30 92 92.00 350

30 3 30 0.16 0.400 2.30 92 92.00 343

31 3 36 0.20 0.447 2.90 90 90.00 345

32 3 42 0.20 0.447 2.90 90 90.00 346

33 3 48 0.20 0.447 2.90 91 91.00 345

34 3 54 0.18 0.424 2.60 91 91.00 346

35 3 60 0.15 0.387 2.20 92 92.00 346

36 3 66 0.13 0.361 1.90 92 92.00 345

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 22 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack TEST DATA

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Particulate Weight in Probe Rinse (mg) 46.40 47.50 44.20 46.03

Particulate Weight in Filter Catch (mg) 45.90 64.30 61.10 57.10

DETAILED RESULTS

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Emission Results

Filterable Particulate Matter Emission Rate (lb/hr) 2.594 3.149 3.010 2.918

Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration (grains/dscf) 0.0239 0.0289 0.0282 0.0270

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 23 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack TEST DATA

DETAILED RESULTS

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Emission Results:

Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.155 0.152 0.154 0.154

Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.450 0.451 0.429 0.443

LAB RESULTS HCL

Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

HCl Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHCl) (ml) 467.0 463.0 448.0 459.3

HCl Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 11.8 11.7 12.1 11.8

HCl Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HCl Total Mass in sample, (mHCl) (mg) 5.50 5.40 5.40 5.43

Stack Gas Concentration

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) 1.691 1.688 1.634 1.671

HCl Concentration, dry basis (ConcHCl) (mg/dscm) 3.25 3.20 3.30 3.25

HCl Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 2.15 2.11 2.18 2.15

HCl Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 1.93 1.90 1.95 1.93

LAB RESULTS HF

Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

HF Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHF) (ml) 467.0 463.0 448.0 459.3

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 34.3 34.6 33.5 34.1

HF Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) (mg) 16.00 16.00 15.00 15.67

Stack Gas Concentration

HF Concentration, dry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 9.46 9.48 9.18 9.37

HF Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 11.38 11.40 11.04 11.27

HF Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 10.24 10.25 9.89 10.13

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 24 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A Nomenclature and

Sample Calculations

Run No. - 1

Constants

CO2Fwt= 44.0 in wg= 0.073529 NO2Fwt= 46.01 HClFwt= 36.46

O2Fwt= 32.0 gr= 0.000142857 COFwt= 28.01 SO2Fwt= 64.06

CON2Fwt= 28.0 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu H2SO4Fwt= 98.08 Cl2Fwt= 70.91

H2OFwt= 18.0 CFwt= 12.011 Tstd= 528 Pstd= 29.92

PFwt= 44.0962 HFFwt= 20.006

Stack Variables

Cp = 0.84 pitot tube coefficient (dimensionless)

Pbar = 29.64 in. Hg barometric pressure

Ebox = 5 ft elevation difference between ground level and meter box

Esam = 60 ft elevation difference between ground level and sampling ports

J 0.9897 gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensionless)

T 72.0 min net run time (minutes)

Vlc = 141.2 g total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g)

%CO2 = 2.50 % percent CO2 by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless)

%O2 = 15.00 % percent O2 by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless)

%N2 = 82.50 % percent N2 by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless)

A = 12.0995 ft2

stack cross-sectional area

Pg = -0.21 in. H2O flue gas static pressure

Tsavg = 811.25 R average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg °F)

SQ'Pavg = 0.42 in. wg average square root 'P

'H = 2.61 in. wg average pressure differential of orifice meter

Tm = 527.83 R dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F)

Vm = 60.50 ft3

volume of metered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet)

Calculated Stack Variables

Barometric pressure at sampling location

NOTE: Barometric pressure recorded at ground level

Psam =Pbar - [ ( Esam / 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ]

Psam = 29.64 - ( ( 60.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 )

Psam = 29.58 in. Hg

Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf)

Vmstd = J * Vm * [ Pbar - ( [ ( Ebox / 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ] + ( 'H / 13.6 ) ) / Pstd ] * ( Tstd / Tm )

Vmstd = 0.9897 * 60.504 * ( ( 29.64 - ( ( 5.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) + ( 2.6083 / 13.6 ) ) / 29.92 ) * ( 528.0 / 527.833 )

Vmstd = 59.713 ft3

Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 °F, scf)

Vwstd = ( 0.04715 ft3

/g ) * Vlc

Vwstd = ( 0.04715 * 141.2 )

Vwstd = 6.7 ft3

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 25 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack

Percent moisture by volume as measured in flue gas

%H2O (Measured) = 100 * [ Vwstd / ( Vwstd + Vmstd ) ]

%H2O (Measured) = 100 * ( 6.658 / ( 6.658 + 59.713 ) )

%H2O (Measured) = 10.03

%H2O (Saturated) = ( 100 / Psam ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( Tsavg + 390.86 - 460 ) ) )

%H2O (Saturated) = ( 100 / 29.564559 ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( 811.250000 + 390.86 - 460 ) ) )

%H2O (Saturated) = 963.52

%H2O = 10.03

Absolute flue gas pressure

Ps =Psam + ( Pg / 13.6 )

Ps = 29.58 + ( -0.21 / 13.6 )

Ps = 29.56 in. Hg

Dry mole fraction of flue gas (dimensionless)

Mfd = 1 - ( %H2O / 100 )

Mfd = 1 - ( 10.03 / 100 )

Mfd = 0.900

Dry molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

Md = [ ( %CO2 / 100 ) * 44.0 ] + [ ( %O2 / 100 ) * 32.0 ] + [ ( ( 100 - %CO2 - %O2 ) / 100 ) * 28.0 ]

Md = ( ( 2.50 / 100 ) * 44.0 ) + ( ( 15.00 / 100 ) * 32.0 ) + ( ( ( 100 - 2.50 - 15.00 ) / 100 ) * 28.0 )

Md = 29.00 lb/lb-mole

Md = 29.00

Wet molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

Ms = Md * Mfd + ( H2OFwt * ( %H2O / 100 ) )

Ms = 29.000 * 0.900 + 18.00 * ( 10.03 / 100 )

Ms = 27.90 lb/lb-mole

Average flue gas velocity (ft/sec)

vs = 85.49 * Cp * ( SQ'Pavg ) * ( Tavg / ( Ps

 * Ms ) )0.5

vs = 85.49 * 0.84 * ( 0.4241 ) * ( 811.25 / ( 29.565 * 27.897 ) ) ^ 0.5

vs = 30.20 ft/sec

Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at actual conditions (acfm)

Qaw =vs * A * 60 sec/min

Qaw = 30.203 * 12.100 * 60

Qaw = 21,926 ft3

/min

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 6 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 26 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack

Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (scfm)

Qsdw =vs * A * ( Tstd / Tsavg ) * ( Ps / Pstd ) * 60 sec/min

Qsdw = 30.203 * 12.100 * ( 528.0 / 811.250 ) * ( 29.565 / 29.92 ) * 60

Qsdw = 14,101 ft3

/min

Dry volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (dscfm)

Qsd =Mfd * vs * A * ( Tstd / Tsavg ) * ( Ps / Pstd ) * 60 sec/min

Qsd = 0.900 * 30.2026 * 12.0995 * ( 528.0 / 811.250 ) * ( 29.565 / 29.92 ) * 60

Qsd = 12,687 ft3

/min

Isokinetic Calculations

Percent isokinetic of sampling rate (%)

%I = ( Pstd / Tstd ) * ( Tsavg / Ps

 ) * [ Vmstd / ( vs * Mfd * T * S * ( Dn

 / 2 )2 ) ]

%I = ((((29.92 / 528.0) * (811.250 / 29.565)) * (59.713 / (30.2026 * 0.900 * 72.0 * (()3.141593 * (0.375 / 2) ^ 2) / 144))) / 60) * 100

%I = 103.1 %

Method 5 Calculations

Filterable PM total catch weight (mg)

mgquan = 92.30 mg

Filterable PM concentration (grains/dscf)

Cgrcm = 0.154322 * mgquan / Vmstd

Cgrcm = 0.0154322 * 92.30 / 59.713

Cgrcm = 0.0239 gr/ft3

Filterable PM mass emission rate (lb/hr)

EMRlbhr = ( mgquan / Vmstd ) * Qsd * ( 60 / 453592 )

EMRlbhr = 92.30 / 59.713 * 12,687 * ( 60 / 453592 )

EMRlbhr = 2.59 lb/hr

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 7 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 27 of 41
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant

Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA

Exhaust Stack

Method 26A Calculations

HCl concentration (ppmvd)

HClppmvd = 2.15 ppmvd

HCl mass emission rate (lb/hr)

MERHCl = ( 60 min/hr * HCl ppmvd * HClFwt * lb * Qsd ) / ( 385.3 ft3

 * 106 )

MERHCl = 60 * 2.146 * 36.46 * 12,687 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 )

MERHCl = 0.155 lb/hr

HF concentration (ppmvd)

HFppmvd = 11.38 ppmvd

HF mass emission rate (lb/hr)

MERHF = ( 60 min/hr * HF ppmvd * HFFwt * lb * Qsd ) / ( 385.3 ft3 * 106

 )

MERHF = 60 * 11.377 * 20.01 * 12,687 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 )

MERHF = 0.45 lb/hr

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 8 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 28 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 29 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 30 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 31 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 32 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 33 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 34 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 35 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 36 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 37 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 38 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 39 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 40 of 41
APPENDIX - Field Data - Page 41 of 41


Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PIT-801

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq 2.0

DqDq 0.0

E1 E

qE q 2.0

E

qEq 3.0

E2

J 2.00

T 0.00

A 0.836

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.029

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") 0.000

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.418

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.418

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 97.20

W (t 3.0") 3.000

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X

Dn

X / Dn (t 1.5)

Y (t 3.0")

Z t 0.75" 1.000

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120608AC

Done By: PB / Date: 7/12/2012 08:28
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PIT-810

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq -1.0

DqDq -3.0

E1 E

qE q 0.0

E

qEq -2.0

E2

J -1.00

T -3.00

A 0.918

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") -0.016

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") -0.048

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.459

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.459

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 97.70

W (t 3.0") 3.200

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X

Dn

X / Dn (t 1.5)

Y (t 3.0")

Z t 0.75" 1.000

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 082412

Done By: PB / Date: 8/24/2012 16:53
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number T-PRB-607

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq 0.0

DqDq 2.0

E1 E

qE q 1.0

E

qEq 1.0

E2

J 2.00

T 1.00

A 0.938

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.033

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") 0.016

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.469

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.469

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 62.60

W (t 3.0")

-or- AA (t 2.0") 2.200

X 1.320

Dn 0.493

X / Dn (t 1.5) 2.677

Y (t 3.0") 3.600

Z t 0.75" 1.120

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120615A

Done By: WD / Date: 7/23/2012 12:16
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PRB-612

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq 0.0

DqDq 0.0

E1 E

qE q 0.0

E

qEq -2.0

E2

J 0.00

T -1.00

A 0.912

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.000

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") -0.016

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.456

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.456

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 68.60

W (t 3.0")

-or- AA (t 2.0") 2.600

X 0.400

Dn 0.190

X / Dn (t 1.5) 2.105

Y (t 3.0") 9.600

Z t 0.75"

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120824A

Done By: PB / Date: 8/24/2012 12:32
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PRB-615

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq 0.0

DqDq 0.0

E1 E

qE q 0.0

E

qEq -2.0

E2

J -2.00

T -1.00

A 1.100

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") -0.038

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") -0.019

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.550

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.550

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 69.50

W (t 3.0")

-or- AA (t 2.0") 2.900

X 0.500

Dn 0.190

X / Dn (t 1.5) 2.632

Y (t 3.0") 11.000

Z t 0.75"

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120824A

Done By: PB / Date: 8/24/2012 12:30
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PIT-801

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq 1.0

DqDq 1.0

E1 E

qE q 0.0

E

qEq 4.0

E2

J -3.00

T -2.00

A 0.828

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") -0.043

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") -0.029

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.414

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.414

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 97.30

W (t 3.0") 3.000

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X

Dn

X / Dn (t 1.5)

Y (t 3.0")

Z t 0.75" 0.900

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120805A

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 11:22
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PIT-810

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq -1.0

DqDq -1.0

E1 E

qE q -2.0

E

qEq 0.0

E2

J 0.00

T -2.00

A 0.892

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.000

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") -0.031

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.446

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.446

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 97.40

W (t 3.0") 3.000

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X

Dn

X / Dn (t 1.5)

Y (t 3.0")

Z t 0.75" 0.800

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 090712

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 10:35
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PRB-607

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq 0.0

DqDq 0.0

E1 E

qE q 0.0

E

qEq -2.0

E2

J 3.00

T 0.00

A 0.934

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.049

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") 0.000

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.467

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.467

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 62.50

W (t 3.0") 6.800

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X 0.900

Dn 0.460

X / Dn (t 1.5) 1.957

Y (t 3.0") 3.400

Z t 0.75" 1.000

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120805A

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 11:26
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PRB-612

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq -1.0

DqDq 0.0

E1 E

qE q -2.0

E

qEq 0.0

E2

J 1.00

T 1.00

A 0.928

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.016

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") 0.016

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.464

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.464

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 62.80

W (t 3.0") 7.000

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X 1.000

Dn 0.460

X / Dn (t 1.5) 2.174

Y (t 3.0") 3.100

Z t 0.75" 1.300

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120805B

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 10:42
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection

Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D Probe / Pitot Number PRB-615

Level and Perpendicular

D No Obstructions

No Damage

D

qDq -1.0

DqDq -1.0

E1 E

qE q -2.0

E

qEq 2.0

E2

J 2.00

T 0.00

A 0.908

T z= A tan J (< 0.125") 0.032

w= A tan T (< 0.03125") 0.000

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 0.375

PA (1.05Dt < PA < 1.5Dt) 0.454

J PB (1.05Dt

 < PB < 1.5Dt) 0.454

PA = PB ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z.

Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements

Effective Length (in.) 62.70

W (t 3.0") 7.000

-or- AA (t 2.0")

X 1.000

Dn 0.460

X / Dn (t 1.5) 2.174

Y (t 3.0") 3.100

Z t 0.75" 1.700

Degree indicating level position for determining D1 and D2.

Degree indicating level position for determining T.

B

A

Dt

3.0 in.

0.75 in.

Dn

x

z

W

Dt

Y 3.0 in.

PA

PB

B

A

A

Dt

Dn

x

AA 2.0 in.

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls)

Job Number: 120805B

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 10:41
Reference Thermometer I.D. :

Temperature Readout I.D.:

Umbilical Cord I.D. :

Umbilical Cord I.D. :

Umbilical Cord I.D. :

Probe/Pitot Thermocouple ID

Filter Exit ID

Umbilical Adapter ID

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Ref. Thermometer Temp (oF)

Stack Thermocouple Temp (oF)

Meterbox Temp IN (oF)

Meterbox Temp OUT (oF)

Filter Exit Temp (oF)

Impinger Exit Temp (oF)

Thermocouple Simulator Setting

(

o

F)

Stack Temp

(

o

F)

Filter Exit

Temp (oF)

Impinger Exit

Temp (oF)

Method 4 Thermocouple System Audit

Tolerance Ranges

Sample Train Thermocouple Audit

Meterbox Thermocouple Audit

Air Compliance Testing Inc.

T-THR-010

T-MTB- 006

T-UMC- 106

T-UMC- 303

T-PRB- 615

T-FXT- 023

T-UMA- 016

612

T-FXTT-UMA- 016

T-FXTT-UMA83

84

85

84

83

83

80

84

81

84

48

98

199

300

401

602

805

1006

1499

48

97

199

300

48

98

082712

PB/SHC 08/27/12
Reference Thermometer I.D. :

Temperature Readout I.D.:

Umbilical Cord I.D. :

Umbilical Cord I.D. :

Umbilical Cord I.D. :

Probe/Pitot Thermocouple ID

Filter Exit ID

Umbilical Adapter ID

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Ref. Thermometer Temp (oF)

Stack Thermocouple Temp (oF)

Meterbox Temp IN (oF)

Meterbox Temp OUT (oF)

Filter Exit Temp (oF)

Impinger Exit Temp (oF)

Thermocouple Simulator Setting

(

o

F)

Stack Temp

(

o

F)

Filter Exit

Temp (oF)

Impinger Exit

Temp (oF)

Method 4 Thermocouple System Audit

Tolerance Ranges

Sample Train Thermocouple Audit

Meterbox Thermocouple Audit

Air Compliance Testing Inc.

T-THR-013

T-MTB- 012

T-UMC- 105

T-UMCT-PRB- 607

T-FXTT-UMA- 030T-FXTT-UMAT-FXTT-UMA84

85

85

84

49

98

200

300

398

598

799

999

1500

49

98

200

300

49

98

082712

PB/SHC 08/27/12
Method 2 Post-Test Thermocouple Check

ALT-011 Post-Test Stack Thermocouple System Check Procedure

Reference Thermometer Serial # 11000622

Reference Thermometer ID T-THR-013

In-Field Temperature Display / Meter Box I.D. MTB-006

Umbilical Cord I.D. UMC-305

Umbilical Cord I.D. UMC-106

Umbilical Cord I.D.

Continuity Check Performed

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4

Probe I.D. PRB-615 PRB-612 PRB-615

Reference Thermometer Ambient Readout (°F) 81.0 81.0 81.0

Stack Temperature Thermocouple Ambient Readout (°F) 80.0 83.0 80.0

Temperature Difference (must be ±2°F) 1.0 -2.0 1.0

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (120805B1-Post-Test Thermocouple Check) 9/20/2012

Job Number: 120805B

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 11:36
Method 2 Post-Test Thermocouple Check

ALT-011 Post-Test Stack Thermocouple System Check Procedure

Reference Thermometer Serial # 11000062

Reference Thermometer ID T-THR-010

In-Field Temperature Display / Meter Box I.D. MTB-012

Umbilical Cord I.D. UMC-105

Umbilical Cord I.D.

Umbilical Cord I.D.

Continuity Check Performed

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4

Probe I.D. PRB-607

Reference Thermometer Ambient Readout (°F) 92.0

Stack Temperature Thermocouple Ambient Readout (°F) 94.0

Temperature Difference (must be ±2°F) -2.0

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (120805A1-Post-Test Thermocouple Check) 9/20/2012

Job Number: 120805A

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 11:33






Method 4 Meter Box Pre-Test Leak Check Calibration

Remove the front panel from the meter box

Disconnect the fan

Hook up the proper pump to the meter box

Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves

Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box

Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper

Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom)

Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice

Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off

Hold for one minute

No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected

Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Reassemble meter box

Plug in capped swagelok stem at sample inlet

Start pump, bringing system vacuum to at least 15 in. Hg

Note DGM reading, start timer

Observe DGM for one minute

No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected

Check oil wick position (should be 1/4" above the black O-ring)

Check pump oil level (should be at fill line)

Meter Box Number MTB- 006

Pump Number PMP- 006

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (080812-Meter Box Pre-Test Leak Check) 8/13/2012

Job Number: 080812

Done By: PB / Date: 8/8/2012 10:41
Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calc Calibration

Meter Box I.D: T - MTB - 006 Standard Meter

Meter Box Serial Number: Calibrated By: Apex Instruments Inc.

Standard Meter I.D: T - DGM - 006 Calibration Date: February 16, 2012

Temp Sensor I.D: T - THR - DGM MTB-006 Gamma: 0.9977

Barometer I.D: T DPG- 006 Serial Number: 1512377

Meter Box Level?

REMOVE CAPS FROM STANDARD METER

Run 1

Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures

'H: 1.00 in.H20 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box

Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 293.425 702.276 (min) In Out In Out

P Bar: 28.78 in.Hg End 12.0 299.810 708.710 4 87.0 87.0 88.0

Net 12.0 6.385 6.434 8 87.0 87.0 89.0

(>5.0 dcf) 12 87.0 88.0 89.0

Avg.

Run 2

Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures

'H: 2.00 in.H20 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box

Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 300.813 709.720 (min) In Out In Out

P Bar: 28.78 in.Hg End 12.0 309.647 718.640 4 70.0 70.0 73.0

Net 12.0 8.834 8.920 8 70.0 70.0 74.0

(>5.0 dcf) 12 70.0 71.0 75.0

Avg.

Run 3

Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures

'H: 3.00 in.H20 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box

Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 310.600 719.596 (min) In Out In Out

P Bar: 28.78 in.Hg End 12.0 321.475 730.594 4 70.0 71.0 75.0

Net 12.0 10.875 10.998 8 70.0 71.0 76.0

(>5.0 dcf) 12 70.0 71.0 76.0

Avg.

'H: 'H@ J

AVG. * Adjust and recalculate if J does

not equal 1.00 ± 0.02

2.135 0.9897

70.17 74.00

70.50 75.67

2.149

2.124

0.9902

0.9886

87.17 88.67

0.9903

905013

1

2

3

2.133

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (080812-Pre-Test Meter Calc) 8/13/2012

Job Number: 080812

Done By: PB / Date: 8/8/2012 10:41
Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration

Run

No.

Calibration

Meter

Correction

Factor (Yc)

Barometric

Press. (Pb)

(in.Hg)

Delta H

(in w.g.)

Meter Box

Volume

(Vd)

(cu.ft.)

Average

Meter Box

Temperature

(Tm) (F)

Standard

Meter

Volume

(Vc)

(cu.ft.)

Standard

Meter

Temperature

(Tc) (F)

Time

(min.) Gamma (Y)

Tolerance

(plus or

minus

0.02)

Delta

H@

Tolerance

(plus or

minus 0.2)

1 0.9977 28.78 1.000 6.434 88.67 6.385 87.17 12 0.9903 0.000611 2.133 -0.003

2 0.9977 28.78 2.000 8.920 74.00 8.834 70.17 12 0.9902 0.000491 2.149 0.014

3 0.9977 28.78 3.000 10.998 75.67 10.875 70.50 12 0.9886 -0.001102 2.124 -0.012

PASS PASS

Average 0.9897 PASS 2.135

Pump

Number T-PMP- 006

Meter Box

Number T-MTB- 006

Reference

Meter

Number T-DGM- 006

Add Values to 30 Day Calibration History

Add Values to Dry Gas Meter Calibration History

Tag Meter Box

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (080812-Pre-Test Meter Console) 8/13/2012

Job Number: 080812

Done By: PB / Date: 8/8/2012 10:41
Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calculation Orifice Calibration Data

Remove the front panel from the meter box

Disconnect the fan

Hook up the proper pump to the meter box

Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves

Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box

Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper

Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom)

Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice

Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off

Hold for one minute

No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected

Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Reassemble meter box

Plug in capped swagelok stem at sample inlet

Start pump, bringing system vacuum to at least 15 in. Hg

Note DGM reading, start timer

Observe DGM for one minute

No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected

Check oil wick position (should be 1/4" above the black O-ring)

Check pump oil level (should be at fill line)

Meter Box Number MTB- 012

Pump Number PMP- 009

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (071312-Meter Box Pre-Test Leak Check) 7/17/2012

Job Number: 071312

Done By: JL / Date: 7/13/2012 15:53
Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calculation Orifice Calibration Data

Meter Box I.D: T - MTB - 012 Standard Meter

Meter Box Serial Number: Calibrated By: Apex Instruments Inc.

Standard Meter I.D: T - DGM - 006 Calibration Date: February 16, 2012

Temp Sensor I.D: T - THR - DGM mtb-012 Gamma: 0.9977

Barometer I.D: T DPG- 010 Serial Number: 1512377

Meter Box Level?

REMOVE CAPS FROM STANDARD METER

Run 1

Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures

'H: 1.00 in.H20 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box

Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 131.070 626.340 (min) In Out In Out

P Bar: 28.52 in.Hg End 12.0 137.898 633.105 4 79.0 78.0 78.0 78.0

Net 12.0 6.828 6.765 8 79.0 78.0 79.0 79.0

(>5.0 dcf) 12 79.0 78.0 80.0 80.0

Avg.

Run 2

Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures

'H: 2.00 in.H20 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box

Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 138.426 633.635 (min) In Out In Out

P Bar: 28.52 in.Hg End 12.0 147.978 643.328 4 79.0 79.0 81.0 81.0

Net 12.0 9.552 9.693 8 79.0 79.0 82.0 82.0

(>5.0 dcf) 12 80.0 79.0 83.0 83.0

Avg.

Run 3

Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures

'H: 3.00 in.H20 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box

Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 148.683 644.049 (min) In Out In Out

P Bar: 28.52 in.Hg End 12.0 160.398 656.046 4 79.0 80.0 83.0 83.0

Net 12.0 11.715 11.997 8 79.0 80.0 84.0 84.0

(>5.0 dcf) 12 79.0 80.0 84.0 84.0

Avg.

'H: 'H@ J

AVG. * Adjust and recalculate if J does

not equal 1.00 ± 0.02

1

2

3

1.856

78.50 79.00

1.0053

1.876 0.9876

79.17 82.00

79.50 83.67

1.890

1.882

0.9833

0.9742

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (071312-Pre-Test Meter Calc) 7/17/2012

Job Number: 071312

Done By: JL / Date: 7/13/2012 15:53
Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calculation Orifice Calibration Data

Run

No.

Calibration

Meter

Correction

Factor (Yc)

Barometric

Press. (Pb)

(in.Hg)

Delta H

(in w.g.)

Meter Box

Volume

(Vd)

(cu.ft.)

Average

Meter Box

Temperature

(Tm) (F)

Standard

Meter

Volume

(Vc)

(cu.ft.)

Standard

Meter

Temperature

(Tc) (F)

Time

(min.) Gamma (Y)

Tolerance

(plus or

minus

0.02)

Delta

H@

Tolerance

(plus or

minus 0.2)

1 0.9977 28.52 1.000 6.765 79.00 6.828 78.50 12 1.0053 0.017716 1.856 -0.020

2 0.9977 28.52 2.000 9.693 82.00 9.552 79.17 12 0.9833 -0.004335 1.890 0.015

3 0.9977 28.52 3.000 11.997 83.67 11.715 79.50 12 0.9742 -0.013381 1.882 0.006

PASS PASS

Average 0.9876 PASS 1.876

Pump

Number T-PMP- 009

Meter Box

Number T-MTB- 012

Reference

Meter

Number T-DGM- 010

Add Values to 30 Day Calibration History

Add Values to Dry Gas Meter Calibration History

Tag Meter Box

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (071312-Pre-Test Meter Console) 7/17/2012

Job Number: 071312

Done By: JL / Date: 7/13/2012 15:53
ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check

NOTE: Do not perform leak check if meter failed ALT-009 requirements.

Remove the front panel from the meter box

Disconnect the fan

Hook up the proper pump to the meter box

Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves

Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box

Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper

Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom)

Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice

Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off

Hold for one minute

No leakage should occur.

Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Reassemble meter box

Meter Box Number MTB- 006

Pump Number PMP- 006

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (120805B-ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check) 9/12/2012

Job Number: 120805B

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 14:06
ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check

NOTE: Do not perform leak check if meter failed ALT-009 requirements.

Remove the front panel from the meter box

Disconnect the fan

Hook up the proper pump to the meter box

Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves

Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box

Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper

Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom)

Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice

Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off

Hold for one minute

No leakage should occur.

Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter

Reassemble meter box

Meter Box Number MTB- 012

Pump Number PMP- 012

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

 (120805A-ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check) 9/20/2012

Job Number: 120805A

Done By: PB / Date: 9/7/2012 11:31
Method 4 DGM Calibration History

Standard Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta Average

Type Date Meter H H@ H H@ H H@ Gamma Delta By

Serial # H@

PRE 1/9/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.911 2.00 1.941 3.00 1.944 1.0008 1.932 PB

POST 1/12/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.17 1.954 1.17 1.948 1.17 1.945 1.0183 1.949 MC

PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.861 2.00 1.898 3.00 1.876 1.0142 1.878 MC

PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 002 1.00 1.817 2.00 1.859 3.00 1.831 1.0025 1.836 MC

PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.533 2.00 1.613 3.00 1.616 1.0007 1.587 MC

PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 015 1.00 2.068 2.00 2.097 3.00 2.117 1.0049 2.094 MC

PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.738 2.00 1.762 3.00 1.825 0.9895 1.775 MC

PRE 1/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.840 2.00 2.034 3.00 1.959 1.0061 1.944 MC

PRE 1/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 2.051 2.00 2.133 3.00 2.123 0.9974 2.102 MC

PRE 2/14/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 001 1.00 1.982 2.00 1.916 3.00 1.864 0.9966 1.921 KL

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.771 2.00 1.858 3.00 1.820 1.0029 1.817 MC

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.770 2.00 1.820 3.00 1.797 1.0088 1.796 MC

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.813 2.00 1.835 3.00 1.732 1.0106 1.793 MC

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.926 2.00 1.969 3.00 1.871 1.0116 1.922 MC

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 1.996 2.00 2.120 3.00 2.085 1.0053 2.067 MC

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 015 1.00 2.109 2.00 2.138 3.00 2.115 1.0194 2.121 MC

PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.738 2.00 1.762 3.00 1.825 0.9895 1.775 MC

PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 002 1.00 1.837 2.00 1.876 3.00 1.818 1.0063 1.844 MC

PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.756 2.00 1.822 3.00 1.814 0.9958 1.797 MC

PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 018 1.00 1.916 2.00 1.915 3.00 1.893 1.0010 1.908 MC

PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 017 1.00 1.869 2.00 1.878 3.00 1.845 0.9939 1.864 MC

PRE 3/28/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.865 2.00 1.834 3.00 1.807 1.0020 1.836 PB

PRE 4/27/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 015 1.00 2.002 2.00 2.187 3.00 2.139 0.9921 2.109 PB

POST 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.587 1.00 1.586 1.00 1.582 1.0223 1.585 KL

POST 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.915 1.00 1.909 1.00 1.912 1.0370 1.912 KL

PRE 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.621 2.00 1.686 3.00 1.648 0.9941 1.652 KL

PRE 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.895 2.00 1.942 3.00 1.923 0.9983 1.920 KL

PRE 5/11/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.886 2.00 1.821 3.00 1.806 1.0190 1.838 JL

POST 5/12/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.50 1.732 1.50 1.695 1.50 1.759 0.9914 1.729 BI

PRE 5/17/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 019 1.00 1.940 2.00 1.890 3.00 1.883 1.0122 1.905 PB

PRE 6/1/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.954 2.00 1.997 3.00 2.010 1.0065 1.978 PB

PRE 6/8/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 2.080 2.00 2.158 3.00 2.154 0.9931 2.131 PB

PRE 6/12/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 018 1.00 1.912 2.00 1.958 3.00 1.921 1.0056 1.930 MC

PRE 6/28/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.766 2.00 1.830 3.00 1.811 1.0091 1.802 PB

PRE 7/13/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.856 2.00 1.890 3.00 1.882 0.9876 1.876 JL

PRE 7/13/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.930 2.00 1.933 3.00 1.896 1.0048 1.920 JL

PRE 7/26/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.548 2.00 1.640 3.00 1.669 0.9950 1.619 PB

PRE 7/26/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.959 2.00 2.028 3.00 1.980 1.0127 1.989 PB

PRE 8/8/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 2.133 2.00 2.149 3.00 2.124 0.9897 2.135 PB

PRE 8/10/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 019 1.00 1.914 2.00 1.838 3.00 1.857 1.0057 1.870 PB

PRE 8/10/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 018 1.00 1.929 2.00 1.909 3.00 1.878 1.0054 1.905 PB

PRE 8/10/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 017 1.00 1.883 2.00 1.908 3.00 1.856 0.9956 1.882 PB

PRE 8/24/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.756 2.00 1.818 3.00 1.796 0.9940 1.790 PB

PRE 9/17/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.880 2.00 1.945 3.00 1.915 0.9811 1.913 PB

PRE 9/18/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.903 2.00 1.897 3.00 1.852 0.9858 1.884 PB

POST 9/17/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.50 1.942 1.50 1.940 3.00 1.927 0.9911 1.936 PB

Meter

Box #

4A - OH - Electronic Calibration HistoryDGM CaliHist
Digital Pressure Gauge Calibration History

(mm Hg) (mm Hg) (mm Hg) (<2mm Hg) (oF)

Date Mercury Barometer DPG Difference PASS/FAIL By whom Adjusted? Temp.

10/27/2011 T-DPG- 009 726 727 -1 PASS KL YES 68

10/28/2011 T-DPG- 005 736 736 0 PASS KL NO 66

11/4/2011 T-DPG- 006 736 735 1 PASS MC NO 67

11/4/2011 T-DPG- 007 736 737 -1 PASS MC NO 67

11/4/2011 T-DPG- 008 736 735 1 PASS MC NO 67

11/4/2011 T-DPG- 010 736 736 0 PASS MC NO 67

11/21/2011 T-DPG- 010 736 736 0 PASS KL NO 64

11/21/2011 T-DPG- 005 744 744 0 PASS BI NO 65

12/23/2011 T-DPG- 006 743 743 0 PASS MC NO 60

12/29/2011 T-DPG- 006 726 726 0 PASS KL NO 64

12/29/2011 T-DPG- 005 726 726 0 PASS KL NO 64

1/5/2012 T-DPG- 010 731 731 0 PASS PB NO 66

1/5/2012 T-DPG- 009 731 732 1 PASS PB NO 66

1/9/2012 T-DPG- 005 736 737 1 PASS PB NO 68

2/20/2012 T-DPG- 005 740 740 0 PASS KL NO 66

3/1/2012 T-DPG- 005 728 729 1 PASS MC NO 66

3/1/2012 T-DPG- 006 728 727 -1 PASS MC NO 66

3/21/2012 T-DPG- 010 728 727 -1 PASS MC NO 70

4/3/2012 T-DPG- 010 731 732 PASS PB NO 64.2

4/3/2012 T-DPG- 009 731 731 PASS PB NO 64.2

4/3/2012 T-DPG- 005 731 732 PASS PB N0 64.2

4/6/2012 T-DPG- 006 740 742 2 PASS KL YES 68

4/25/2012 T-DPG- 010 725 726 -1 PASS BI NO 60

5/4/2012 T-DPG- 005 731 730 -1 PASS KL NO 68

5/4/2012 T-DPG- 010 731 730 -1 PASS KL NO 68

5/7/2012 T-DPG- 006 728 728 0 PASS KL NO 68

6/28/2012 T-DPG- 010 723.93 723 0.93 PASS PB NO 90

7/25/2012 T-DPG- 009 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 78

8/8/2012 T-DPG- 005 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 76.2

8/8/2012 T-DPG- 006 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 76.2

8/9/2012 T-DPG- 008 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 77.7

9/4/2012 T-DPG- 008 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.5

9/4/2012 T-DPG- 005 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 77.5

9/4/2012 T-DPG- 006 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.5

9/7/2012 T-DPG- 005 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 77.2

9/7/2012 T-DPG- 006 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.2

9/7/2012 T-DPG- 008 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.2

9/7/2012 T-DPG- 009 729 728 -1 PASS PB NO 77.2

9/14/2012 T-DPG- 005 734 734 0 PASS PB NO 75.3

9/14/2012 T-DPG- 006 734 734 0 PASS PB NO 75.3

Digital Pressure

Gauge ID#

4A - OH - Electronic Calibration HistoryDPG CaliHist
Method 5 Acetone Residuals History

VOL RESIDUAL VOL RESIDUAL VOL RESIDUAL

DATE (ml) (g/ml) DATE (ml) (g/ml) DATE (ml) (g/ml)

10/09/09 200 0.0000008 11/05/10 200 0.0000000 12/19/11 200 0.0000000

10/12/09 200 0.0000015 11/13/10 200 0.0000000 12/23/11 200 0.0000000

10/14/09 200 0.0000000 11/15/10 200 0.0000000 12/29/11 200 0.0000030

10/14/09 200 0.0000005 11/23/10 200 0.0000000 12/29/11 200 0.0000050

10/20/09 200 0.0000005 11/26/10 200 0.0000005 12/29/11 200 0.0000000

10/20/09 200 0.0000008 12/10/10 200 0.0000000 01/18/12 200 0.0000000

10/26/09 200 0.0000079 12/13/10 200 0.0000000 01/19/12 200 0.0000025

11/04/09 200 0.0000010 12/17/10 200 0.0000018 01/31/12 200 0.0000005

11/30/09 200 0.0000000 01/06/11 200 0.0000003 02/03/12 200 0.0000000

11/30/09 200 0.0000000 01/07/11 200 0.0000075 02/29/12 200 0.0000079

12/02/09 200 0.0000000 01/27/11 200 0.0000018 03/08/12 200 0.0000035

01/04/10 200 0.0000010 01/28/11 200 0.0000000 03/16/12 200 0.0000100

01/05/10 200 0.0000000 01/28/11 200 0.0000010 03/26/12 200 0.0000060

01/11/10 200 0.0000000 01/28/11 200 0.0000020 03/26/12 200 0.0000065

01/15/10 250 0.0000002 02/18/11 200 0.0000000 03/30/12 200 0.0000079

01/20/10 200 0.0000030 02/28/11 200 0.0000000 04/03/12 200 0.0000079

02/02/10 200 0.0000010 03/06/11 200 0.0000013 04/05/12 200 0.0000079

02/11/10 200 0.0000060 03/06/11 200 0.0000008 04/11/12 150 0.0000079

02/11/10 200 0.0000050 03/16/11 200 0.0000008 04/17/12 200 0.0000079

02/12/10 200 0.0000000 03/23/11 200 0.0000000 04/27/12 100 0.0000079

02/17/10 220 0.0000016 04/01/11 200 0.0000079 04/28/12 100 0.0000000

03/02/10 200 0.0000027 04/01/11 200 0.0000048 05/01/12 200 0.0000079

03/02/10 200 0.0000000 04/08/11 200 0.0000000 05/02/12 200 0.0000079

03/29/10 300 0.0000012 04/22/11 200 0.0000015 05/04/12 200 0.0000079

04/16/10 200 0.0000070 04/23/11 200 0.0000058 05/05/12 200 0.0000023

04/16/10 200 0.0000005 04/24/11 200 0.0000000 05/13/12 200 0.0000000

04/16/10 200 0.0000000 04/29/11 200 0.0000010 05/20/12 100 0.0000790

04/20/10 200 0.0000013 05/08/11 200 0.0000005 05/24/12 100 0.0000270

04/22/10 200 0.0000018 05/15/11 200 0.0000068 06/08/12 200 0.0000040

05/12/10 200 0.0000018 05/20/11 200 0.0000005 06/14/12 200 0.0000079

05/24/10 200 0.0000070 05/21/11 200 0.0000010 07/02/12 200 0.0000079

05/24/10 200 0.0000079 06/04/11 200 0.0000079 07/05/12 200 0.0000079

05/25/10 100 0.0000079 06/06/11 200 0.0000043 07/20/12 200 0.0000048

06/04/10 100 0.0000050 06/10/11 200 0.0000005 07/20/12 200 0.0000050

06/16/10 200 0.0000025 06/24/11 200 0.0000079 07/21/12 200 0.0000050

06/29/10 200 0.0000033 07/07/11 200 0.0000079 08/01/12 200 0.0000079

07/29/10 200 0.0000018 07/16/11 200 0.0000079 08/09/12 100 0.0000060

07/29/10 200 0.0000033 08/08/11 200 0.0000045 08/09/12 200 0.0000000

08/11/10 200 0.0000010 08/09/11 200 0.0000020 08/10/12 200 0.0000000

08/12/10 200 0.0000079 08/24/11 200 0.0000079 08/17/12 400 0.0000018

08/20/10 200 0.0000043 09/12/11 200 0.0000005 08/24/12 150 0.0000013

08/21/10 200 0.0000079 09/26/11 200 0.0000018 08/26/12 200 0.0000060

08/31/10 200 0.0000079 09/28/11 200 0.0000020 09/04/12 200 0.0000045

08/31/10 200 0.0000010 09/29/11 200 0.0000005 09/04/12 200 0.0000079

09/01/10 200 0.0000079 09/29/11 200 0.0000015

09/01/10 200 0.0000063 09/26/11 200 0.0000000

09/12/10 200 0.0000065 10/05/11 200 0.0000030

09/21/10 200 0.0000079 10/05/11 200 0.0000028

09/22/10 200 0.0000079 10/05/11 200 0.0000025

10/01/10 200 0.0000079 10/22/11 200 0.0000015

10/06/10 200 0.0000000 10/26/11 200 0.0000038

10/14/10 200 0.0000015 10/26/11 200 0.0000013

10/14/10 200 0.0000015 11/07/11 100 0.0000000

10/15/10 200 0.0000053 11/21/11 200 0.0000005

10/22/10 200 0.0000000 11/21/11 200 0.0000000

10/24/10 200 0.0000025 11/23/11 200 0.0000015

10/29/10 200 0.0000000 12/14/11 200 0.0000000

11/02/10 200 0.0000000 12/18/11 200 0.0000000
Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

Filter Specifications










Astronomical Applications Dept.

U.S. Naval Observatory

Washington, DC 20392-5420

YORK, PENNSYLVANIA

 o , o ,

W 76 44, N39 58

Altitude and Azimuth of the Sun

Aug 30, 2012

Eastern Standard Time

 Altitude Azimuth

 (E of N)

 h m o o

04:40 -10.6 68.9

04:50 -8.8 70.7

05:00 -7.0 72.3

05:10 -5.2 74.0

05:20 -3.3 75.7

05:30 -1.4 77.3

05:40 0.9 78.9

05:50 2.6 80.5

06:00 4.4 82.1

06:10 6.2 83.7

06:20 8.1 85.3

06:30 10.0 86.8

06:40 11.9 88.4

06:50 13.8 90.0

07:00 15.7 91.7

07:10 17.6 93.3

07:20 19.5 94.9

07:30 21.4 96.6

07:40 23.3 98.3

07:50 25.2 100.1

08:00 27.1 101.9

08:10 29.0 103.7

08:20 30.8 105.6

08:30 32.6 107.5

08:40 34.5 109.5

08:50 36.2 111.6

09:00 38.0 113.8

09:10 39.7 116.1

09:20 41.4 118.4

09:30 43.1 120.9

09:40 44.7 123.5

09:50 46.3 126.2

10:00 47.8 129.1

10:10 49.3 132.1

10:20 50.7 135.3

10:30 52.0 138.6

10:40 53.2 142.2

10:50 54.3 145.9

11:00 55.3 149.8

11:10 56.2 153.9

11:20 57.0 158.1

11:30 57.6 162.6

11:40 58.1 167.1

Altitude/Azimuth Table for One Day Page 1 of 2

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/aa_altazw.pl 9/20/2012
11:50 58.5 171.8

12:00 58.7 176.5

12:10 58.7 181.3

12:20 58.6 186.0

12:30 58.3 190.7

12:40 57.9 195.3

12:50 57.3 199.8

13:00 56.6 204.1

13:10 55.7 208.3

13:20 54.8 212.3

13:30 53.7 216.1

13:40 52.5 219.7

13:50 51.2 223.1

14:00 49.9 226.4

14:10 48.5 229.5

14:20 47.0 232.4

14:30 45.4 235.2

14:40 43.8 237.8

14:50 42.2 240.4

15:00 40.5 242.8

15:10 38.8 245.1

15:20 37.0 247.3

15:30 35.2 249.4

15:40 33.4 251.4

15:50 31.6 253.4

16:00 29.7 255.3

16:10 27.9 257.2

16:20 26.0 259.0

16:30 24.1 260.7

16:40 22.2 262.5

16:50 20.3 264.2

17:00 18.4 265.8

17:10 16.5 267.5

17:20 14.6 269.1

17:30 12.7 270.7

17:40 10.8 272.3

17:50 8.9 273.9

18:00 7.0 275.4

18:10 5.1 277.0

18:20 3.3 278.6

18:30 1.5 280.2

18:40 -0.1 281.8

18:50 -2.6 283.4

19:00 -4.4 285.1

19:10 -6.3 286.7

19:20 -8.1 288.4

19:30 -9.9 290.1

19:40 -11.7 291.8

Back to form

Altitude/Azimuth Table for One Day Page 2 of 2

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/aa_altazw.pl 9/20/2012
Copyrighted page(s) removed. Copyrighted 

material is not available in Regulations.gov since 

it may not be reproduced without consent of the 

copyright holder. 

Removed pages can be viewed at the USEPA 

Docket Center, Public Reading Room. 

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW 

Room 3334 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: 202-566-1744 

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov

PO Box 41156 • Cleveland OH 44141

800-EPA-AIR1 • 440-230-1100

July 16, 2012

Mr. Rick Millard

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

909 Elmerton Avenue

Harrisburg, PA 17110

Subject: Glen-Gery Corporation – York, PA

(Title V Permit 67-05045 – Spring Garden Township, York County)

Pretest Procedural Protocol for August 30, 2012 Kiln Test Event

Dear Mr. Millard:

Enclosed please find a copy of this Pretest Procedural Protocol completed by Air Compliance

Testing, Inc. for the Glen-Gery Corporation. Facility located in York, PA. Please note that the

following entries address the specific sections as found in the PA DEP Source Testing Manual

(Revision 8).

A date of August 30, 2012 has been selected as the test day. Run No.1’s start time is targeted for

8:00 am. If this test’s start time changes, Air Compliance Testing or facility personnel will contact

you in advance to notify you of the new starting time.

2.1.1.1

Glen-Gery Corporation

1090 E. Boundary Avenue

York, PA 17403

Attn: Mr. Mike Krzyzanowski

Environmental Manager

Phone: 610-562-3076

2.1.1.2

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

Mr. Sin Hoi Chiew

Project Manger

PO Box 41156

Cleveland, OH 44141-0156

(800) 372-2471
PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 2 July 17, 2012

2.1.1.3

The laboratory analysis required for EPA Method 5 will be completed by Air Compliance Testing,

Inc. and the analysis for EPA Method 26A will be performed by Maxxam Analytics Inc. located in

Coopersburg, PA.

2.1.1.4

A process description is as follows:

The Glen-Gery York facility operates two natural gas-fired tunnel kilns. The kilns produce brick

of various sizes and colors. Kiln 2 (Unit ID 102) is fitted with a dry limestone absorber (DLA)

system to control hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

The DLA system is comprised of a limestone cascade absorber equipped with a limestone silo

located atop the DLA. Exhaust gases from the kiln pass through the absorber. The absorber is

equipped with a peeling drum that mechanically removes the reacted layer from the crushed

limestone. The “peeled” limestone is pneumatically conveyed from the peeling drum back to the

limestone feed bin, located on top of the absorber. The reacted layer that has been peeled from the

limestone is discharged via gravity to a hopper for disposal. A block diagram depicting the kiln and

DLA arrangements is attached.

2.1.1.5

Tunnel Kiln

EPA Methods

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A

sampling location

Green Brick

from Dryers

Natural Gas

Fired Brick

Cascade

Adsorber

LS Feed

Silo

Peeling

Drum

Extraction

Screw

DLA

Bypass

Damper

Closed

Reacted LS to

Covered Bins

EPA Methods

1, 2, 3, 4, and 26A

sampling location

Limestone

From Trucks

2.1.1.6

NA

2.1.1.7

Title V Permit 67-05045 – Spring Garden Township, York County

2.1.1.8

The purpose of the testing is to satisfy the requirements of Source ID 102, Section D.II.009.
PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 3 July 17, 2012

2.1.1.9

To the best of our knowledge, this Pretest Procedural Protocol contains all the testing requirements

specified in applicable state and federal regulations, operating permits and plan approvals.

2.1.1.10

During this test kiln 2 will be operated the fastest process rate possible for the product

manufactured.

2.1.1.11

Process data will be collected using the plant's internal record keeping program.

2.1.1.12

The table below summarizes the pollutants, sampling methodology, and any method variations that

will be utilized during this compliance test event.

Emission Unit Pollutant(s) to

be Tested

EPA Test Method(s) Total Time for

Test Runs

Number of

Sampling Runs

Kiln No. 2 Total Front-half

Particulate

Matter (PM)

5 (currently

promulgated versions)

90 – 120

minutes

3

Kiln No. 2 Hydrochloric

Acid and

Hydrofluoric

Acid

26A (currently

promulgated versions)

90 – 120

minutes

3

2.1.1.13

Please see the appendix of this test plan for the sample train schematics that will be utilized during

this test event.

2.1.1.14

Kiln No. 2 Inlet Duct Traverse Point Schematic
PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 4 July 17, 2012

120.0"

2.53 Equivalent Diameters

Upstream from

Disturbance

47.5" x 47.0" I.D.

Elliptical Stack

(2) 4.0" I.D.

Sampling Ports

Located 90°Apart

660.0"

13.89 Equivalent

Diameters Downstream

from Disturbance

47.5" I.D.

2.5"

Port 1

1 2 3 4 5 6

Port 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

2.5"

47.0" I.D.

Point

1

2

3

4

5

6

Distance From

Inside Wall (in.)

Port 1

2.1

6.9

14.1

33.4

40.6

45.4

% of Duct Depth

4.4

14.6

29.6

70.4

85.4

95.6

2.1

6.9

13.9

33.1

40.1

44.9

Distance From

Inside Wall (in.)

Port 2

Kiln No. 2 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Schematic

2.1.1.15

EPA Method 5 - The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the

filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water.

EPA Method 26A - Analysis will be performed within two weeks after their collection utilizing

an ion chromatograph with a conductivity detector for chlorine and fluorine ion separation and

quantization.

2.1.1.16

All of the calculations performed during this compliance test event will follow the most currently

promulgated EPA Method calculation algorithms.

2.1.1.17

See attached examples of the field data sheets that will be utilized during this test event.
PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 5 July 17, 2012

Thank you again for your careful consideration, and I am looking forward to working with you on

this upcoming compliance testing project.

Sincerely,

Mr. Tyson E. Houchin

Operations Director

Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

cc: Mr. Mike Krzyzanowski- Glen-Gery Corporation